Cheraw Healthcare
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Cheraw Healthcare has received a Trust Grade of D, indicating below-average performance with some significant concerns. Ranking #73 out of 186 facilities in South Carolina places it in the top half of the state, while being the only option in Chesterfield County means families have no better local alternatives. Unfortunately, the facility is experiencing a worsening trend, with issues increasing from 1 in 2023 to 6 in 2024. Staffing is a notable weakness, rated at 2 out of 5 stars, with a turnover rate of 48%, which is similar to the state average but still concerning. The facility has also incurred $187,205 in fines, which is alarming as it is higher than all other facilities in South Carolina, indicating potential compliance problems. In terms of care, there are critical incidents that raise red flags. One serious finding involved a staff member using physical restraint on a resident, which led to immediate action and the termination of that employee. Additionally, there were failures to remove expired medications from storage areas, and documentation errors regarding resident care plans were noted, which could impact patient safety. While the facility has some strengths, such as being proactive in addressing immediate concerns, these serious issues and the overall trust score suggest families should carefully consider their options.
- Trust Score
- D
- In South Carolina
- #73/186
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Worse
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 48% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- $187,205 in fines. Lower than most South Carolina facilities. Relatively clean record.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 20 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for South Carolina. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ○ Average
- 7 deficiencies on record. Average for a facility this size. Mostly minor or procedural issues.
The Good
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in fire safety.
The Bad
Near South Carolina average (2.8)
Meets federal standards, typical of most facilities
Near South Carolina avg (46%)
Higher turnover may affect care consistency
Well above median ($33,413)
Significant penalties indicating serious issues
The Ugly 7 deficiencies on record
Nov 2024
5 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0604
(Tag F0604)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on review of facility policy, record review, observation, and interviews, the facility failed to complete a restraint asse...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Tube Feeding
(Tag F0693)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on review of facility policy, observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)107 rec...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on review of facility policy, record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide respiratory care i...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0578
(Tag F0578)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 5. Review of R73's Face Sheet revealed R73 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including but not limited to: ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observations, review of facility policy, and interviews, the facility failed to remove expired medications and biologicals from 2 of 2 medication storage rooms.
Findings include:
Review of t...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jun 2024
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, record review, facility document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement an appropriate fall intervention to prevent the wheelchair from r...
Read full inspector narrative →
Apr 2023
1 deficiency
1 IJ
CRITICAL
(J)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Free from Abuse/Neglect
(Tag F0600)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on review of the facility policy, review of video evidence, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to protect ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: 1 life-threatening violation(s), $187,205 in fines. Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 7 deficiencies on record, including 1 critical (life-threatening) violation. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
- • $187,205 in fines. Extremely high, among the most fined facilities in South Carolina. Major compliance failures.
- • Grade D (43/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Cheraw Healthcare's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns Cheraw Healthcare an overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars, which is considered average nationally. Within South Carolina, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This mid-range rating indicates the facility meets federal standards but may have areas for improvement.
How is Cheraw Healthcare Staffed?
CMS rates Cheraw Healthcare's staffing level at 2 out of 5 stars, which is below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 48%, compared to the South Carolina average of 46%.
What Have Inspectors Found at Cheraw Healthcare?
State health inspectors documented 7 deficiencies at Cheraw Healthcare during 2023 to 2024. These included: 1 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death) and 6 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.
Who Owns and Operates Cheraw Healthcare?
Cheraw Healthcare is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 120 certified beds and approximately 111 residents (about 92% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in Cheraw, South Carolina.
How Does Cheraw Healthcare Compare to Other South Carolina Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in South Carolina, Cheraw Healthcare's overall rating (3 stars) is above the state average of 2.8, staff turnover (48%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (3 stars) is at the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Cheraw Healthcare?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations and the below-average staffing rating.
Is Cheraw Healthcare Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, Cheraw Healthcare has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 1 Immediate Jeopardy citation (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 3-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in South Carolina. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.
Do Nurses at Cheraw Healthcare Stick Around?
Cheraw Healthcare has a staff turnover rate of 48%, which is about average for South Carolina nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Cheraw Healthcare Ever Fined?
Cheraw Healthcare has been fined $187,205 across 1 penalty action. This is 5.4x the South Carolina average of $34,951. Fines at this level are uncommon and typically indicate a pattern of serious deficiencies, repeated violations, or failure to correct problems promptly. CMS reserves penalties of this magnitude for facilities that pose significant, documented risk to resident health or safety. Families should request specific documentation of what issues led to these fines and what systemic changes have been implemented.
Is Cheraw Healthcare on Any Federal Watch List?
Cheraw Healthcare is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.