Rehab Center of Cheraw

1150 State Road, Cheraw, SC 29520 (843) 537-2060
For profit - Limited Liability company 104 Beds FUNDAMENTAL HEALTHCARE Data: November 2025 2 Immediate Jeopardy citations
Trust Grade
0/100
Last Inspection: May 2025

Inspected within the last 6 months. Data reflects current conditions.

Overview

The Rehab Center of Cheraw has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns about the quality of care provided at this facility. It is ranked at the bottom of the list in both South Carolina and Chesterfield County, meaning there are no other facilities deemed worse in these locations. While the center has shown some improvement, reducing issues from 10 in 2024 to 2 in 2025, this is overshadowed by serious incidents, including a resident who suffered asphyxiation due to not receiving a proper therapeutic diet, and another resident who successfully eloped from the facility, raising serious safety concerns. Staffing is rated poorly, with a high turnover rate of 56%, and the facility has incurred $64,075 in fines, which is more than 88% of facilities in South Carolina. Additionally, there is less RN coverage than 85% of state facilities, which could put residents at risk for unnoticed health issues.

Trust Score
F
0/100
In South Carolina
#112/223
Top 50%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Getting Better
10 → 2 violations
Staff Stability
⚠ Watch
56% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
Penalties
○ Average
$64,075 in fines. Higher than 63% of South Carolina facilities. Some compliance issues.
Skilled Nurses
⚠ Watch
Each resident gets only 18 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for South Carolina. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
Violations
⚠ Watch
15 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
☆☆☆☆☆
0.0
Overall Rating
☆☆☆☆☆
0.0
Staff Levels
☆☆☆☆☆
0.0
Care Quality
☆☆☆☆☆
0.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2024: 10 issues
2025: 2 issues

The Good

  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in fire safety.

The Bad

Staff Turnover: 56%

10pts above South Carolina avg (46%)

Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity

Federal Fines: $64,075

Above median ($33,413)

Moderate penalties - review what triggered them

Chain: FUNDAMENTAL HEALTHCARE

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

Staff turnover is elevated (56%)

8 points above South Carolina average of 48%

The Ugly 15 deficiencies on record

2 life-threatening
May 2025 2 deficiencies 1 IJ
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Deficiency F0692 (Tag F0692)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on review of facility policy, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that 1 of 3 residents reviewed f...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on review of facility policy, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that 1 of 3 residents reviewed for nutrition, Resident (R)248, received a therapeutic diet consistent with the resident's clinical condition and the recommendations of the Speech Language Pathologist (SLP). Specifically, the facility did not implement a recommended mechanical soft diet for R248, with dysphagia and documented swallowing difficulties. As a result, the resident continued to receive regular textured food resulting in the resident suffering from asphyxiation and expiring in the facility. On 05/04/25 at 3:26 PM, the State Agency (SA) determined that the facility's non-compliance with one or more federal health, safety, and/or quality regulations has cause or was likely to cause serious harm, serious impairment or death. On 05/05/25 at 4:19 PM, the survey team provided the Administrator with a copy of the CMS Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) Template, informing the facility IJ existed as of 03/05/25. The IJ was related to 42 CFR 483.25- Nutritional and Hydration Status. On 05/05/25 at 5:45 PM, the facility provided an acceptable IJ Removal Plan. On 05/06/25, the survey team validated the facility's corrective actions and confirmed the facility identified and corrected the noncompliance. The SA is considering this IJ at Past Non-Compliance as of 04/25/25. An extended survey was conducted in conjunction with the Recertification/Complaint Survey for non-compliance at F692, constituting substandard quality of care. Findings Include: Review of facility policy titled Rehabilitation Services Policies and Procedures last revised 03/01/19, revealed, Screens will be conducted on all new admissions/readmission. Screens are also conducted on a quarterly and annual basis unless indicated. A Speech Language Pathologist will screen all patients/residents in facility at least every six months to assist in the determination of patient/resident need for ongoing use of feeding tube and/or to provide services to attempt to restore, if possible, normal eating skills and/or identify and manage related complications of feeding tube use. Under circumstances whereby a screening process is insufficient to determine above an SLP, and the order of physician, may conduct a formal evaluation to accomplish same. Review of the undated facility policy titled Mechanical Soft revealed, The mechanical soft diet is used to optimize nutritional intake for individuals who have difficulty chewing or swallowing. Clients who exhibit dental problems, missing teeth, no dentures, chewing or swallowing problems that may be diagnosed with oral pharyngeal dysphagia, and those with generalized weakness to help improve overall intake. Individuals with a wide variety of chewing and swallowing abilities as well as having a variance in alertness will benefit from this altered consistency diet. Foods to avoid: hot dogs; sausages (unless ground or finely chopped; chunky nut butter; fish with bones. Review of R248's Face Sheet revealed R248 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including but not limited to: Dementia, dysphagia and aphasia. Review of R248's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/14/25, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 99, indicating that the interview was unable to be completed. Further review revealed, R248 presented with the following signs and symptoms of a swallowing disorder: Holding food in mouth/cheeks or residual food in mouth after meals, coughing or choking during meals or when swallowing medications, and a nutritional approach of a Mechanically Altered Diet while a resident. R248 also required supervision or touching assistance when eating. Review of R248's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) revealed a diet order with a start date of 02/07/25, revealed, House, Nectar. Special Instructions: Fortified Mashed Potatoes lunch & dinner. Review of R248's SLP Evaluation and Plan of Treatment dated 03/05/25 and 04/10/25, revealed R248 was referred for services due to poor swallow safety and moderate confusion. R248 had recommendations for Mechanical Soft textures and Nectar thick liquids. Review of R248's Weekly SLP Evaluation and Plan of Treatments dated 03/11/25/, 3/17/25 and 04/01/25 - 04/09/25, revealed R248 had recommendations for Mechanical Soft textures and Nectar thick liquids. Review of the Week-at-a-Glance menu for 04/11/25, revealed, Chili Dog with cheese, seasoned French fries, seasoned corn, sherbet and a beverage of choice. Review of R248's Care Plan did not revealed a Care Plan or interventions related to R248's theraputic diet. Review of R248's Progress Note dated 02/21/25, revealed, She has expressive aphasia and requires mech altered meals/liquids for aspiration precautions. Review of R248's Progress Note dated 04/11/25, revealed, This nurse was notified by [CNA1] and [CNA3] that resident looked pale and asked me to assess resident. Resident was noted to be very pale with no respirations and no pulse. Resident was immediately lowered to the floor by staff from her wheelchair and this nurse initiated CPR while [CNA3] called 911. RN (residents nurse) entered the day room and took over CPR as this nurse began to gather residents paperwork and notify [residents emergency contact]. notified residents other family including the residents father. EMS arrived and continued life saving interventions in facility and in the ambulance. Interventions were unsuccessful. notified administrator, notified on call MD. Review of a South Carolina Pre-Hospital Care Report dated 04/11/25, revealed the following: Incident Information: [Local] Emergency Medical Services (EMS) agency was dispatched to Rehab Center of Cheraw at 5:33 PM for Unconscious/Fainting/Near-Fainting, patient evaluated, and care provided. Impression: Primary and secondary symptoms/impressions noted as cardiac arrest. Patient Care Report Narrative: A- [EMS1] dispatched for a female patient unconscious CPR in progress. Upon arrival on scene patient was found laying supine on the floor workers doing compressions. Facility stated that she was eatting [sic] and they come to check on her and found her not breahting [sic] no pluse [sic] and began chest compression stated she might have choked on a hotdog that she was eatting [sic]. Patient treatment is as documented. IGEL (device for securing and maintaining a patient's airway) Put in place after removing hotdog pieces from airway. Cardiac Arrest: Yes, Prior to EMS Arrival, Etiology (Cause): Respiratory/Asphyxia (Oxygen deprivation) Review of R248's Emergency Department (ED) progress note dated 04/11/25 at 6:16 PM, revealed, Per, EMS, presenting from [Facility] for cardiac arrest. Staff members reportedly had served [R248] a dinner tray, and about 3 to 4 minutes when they return to her room, found her slumped over, unresponsive and pulseless. EMS had performed 30 minutes of cardiac resuscitation prehospital, 4 rounds of epinephrine and placed an I-gel. They noticed chunks of hotdog in her airway that was obstructing, and they removed some prior. Under the medical decision making section the following was also revealed: Patient was intubated by me as I suspected foreign body/aspiration. I was able to remove a chunk of a hot dog from her left cheek, otherwise I did not visualize any additional foreign body or food products within the airway/covering her cords. Review of surveillance video footage provided by the facility, recorded on 04/11/25 at 5:24 PM, R248 can been seen in an empty day room, wheeling herself up to a table where she begins to eat her lunch. At approximately 5:31 PM, R248 is noted to be slumped over the back of her wheelchair non- responsive. A facility staff member is then seen walking up to R248, stands a few feet from her looks over then exits the room. At 5:32 PM, two additional staff members enter the day room and seen checking on the resident and places her on the floor. One minute later at 5:33 PM, CPR is begun and the video ends. During an interview on 05/05/25 at 11:02 AM, the Registered Dietitian (RD) stated, he visits the facility weekly. He will ask the floor nurses if there have been any changes with residents, he needs to be aware of. The RD also reviews speech therapy notes and if they make any recommendations, they go with them and follow the recommendations. The RD also states when changes are made to diet orders the floor supervisor will place those in the resident's records. The RD was unable to recall what diet R248 was on, or any recommendations made as he did not have the information available to review. During an interview on 05/05/25 at 12:03 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)1 and Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)1 stated, they are familiar with R248 and her care. They stated on the day of the incident R248 was in the north day room eating when CNA1 noticed that she was looking pale and went to get the nurse. LPN1 and other staff members removed her from the chair down to the floor and started CPR. LPN1 did a clean sweep of her mouth and food was present such as bread and portions of a hot dog. LPN1 states that she was aware that she had diagnoses of dysphagia, but she wasn't aware of any changes with her diet, she just knows that she was working with ST. They stated, supervision or touch assistance with meals means the residents are in a group setting to be monitored more closely. LPN1 stated the ST makes the recommendations to the nursing department, unit manager then staff on the floor and it's also conveyed on the meal ticket and R248 was on a regular diet always. During an interview on 05/05/25 at 12:21 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated she isn't aware of any foods they are restricted on certain diets. When a resident is on a house diet that's like a regular diet with no restrictions. When diet orders change, they follow diet communication slips. The nursing department and dietary manager can update diet orders. During an interview on 05/05/25 at 12:36 PM, CNA1 stated she is very familiar with R248's care. She also stated to her knowledge she isn't familiar with any residents who have difficulty swallowing, but normally sees residents who are packers, so their diet will change from regular to a mechanical or pureed diet. CNA1 states the ST communicates with the nurses and dietary staff when changes are needed via a communication slip and verbal order from ST. During an interview on 05/05/25 at 12:42 PM, the ST stated, R248 was admitted on a regular diet, but he was trying her out on a mechanical soft diet. R248 was not eating as much as she should with the regular diet. ST notes the texture for a resident with dysphagia depends on the resident, but the lowest level is pureed honey and highest is chopped easy chew. ST stated R248 had mild difficulty with chewing, and he was seeing her 5x a week for 8 weeks. ST noted dysphagia affected R248's eating and swallowing as she was chewing, spitting and spilling food out of her mouth. The ST further revealed when he completes a diet communication slip, he gives them both to dietary and the DON, and he also lets them know verbally. ST states if he turns in a diet communication slip for lunch, it is to be in effect at dinner. ST confirmed the discharge summary from his assessment on 4/10/25 had recommendations for soft mechanical textures and nectar thick liquids. On 05/05/25 at 5:45 PM the facility provided an acceptable IJ Removal Plan, identicating Past-Non- Compliance which included: Resident identified has diagnosis of dysphagia. Resident is no longer in the facility. Resident admitted on diet of regular textures and nectar thick liquids. Resident was picked up on speech caseload on 2/10/25 and 3/5/25 with a goal of consuming regular diet and th.in liquids. Resident was discharged from speech on 04/10/25 with recommendations for mechanically altered diet and thin liquids. New diet recommendation not communicated effectively by speech therapist to dietary or nursing departments. Investigation initiated and contracted therapy provider was notified. SLP will be suspended pending investigation. Regional therapist in house the week of 04-28-25 thru 05-02-25 for an additional audit of residents on current speech caseload. An audit of current resident's diet as well as most current speech recommendations will be completed by Interdisciplinary Team to identify any discrepancies on 4/25/25. Discrepancies identified were corrected with recommended speech diets, provider notified, and care plans updated on 04/25/25. Meal Tracker will also be audited on 04/25/25 to ensure ordered diets match the tray ticket. Discrepancies identified were corrected on 04/25/25. Licensed nurses and therapy department were re-educated starting on April 25/2025, regarding the expectation that any changes to diet are communicated within the IDT team via diet communication slip. SLP to complete diet communication slip, keep a copy, and give a copy to DOR, CDM, and Nurse Manager. Dietary Communication Slips will be reviewed in clinical morning meeting Monday-Friday. Administrator/designee will review 3 residents per week, according to MDS assessment per calendar, to validate ordered diet matches most current speech recommendation. Facility Administrator/designee will be responsible for the overall implementation and validation of this plan. Results of these reviews will be presented to the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement committee for review and recommendations for 3 months. Any concerns will be addresses at time. An Ad Hoc QAPI will be held on 4/25/25. Medical Director was notified of the incident and plan for improvement on 04/25/25. Allegation of Compliance: 04/25/25
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pharmacy Services (Tag F0755)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on review of the facility's policy, record review, pharmacy delivery manifests, and interviews, the facility failed to ens...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on review of the facility's policy, record review, pharmacy delivery manifests, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure medications were available and administered as ordered, for 1 of 1 resident (Residents (R)6), reviewed for pharmacy services. Specifically, R6 missed six scheduled doses of a controlled pain medication (Oxycodone), over a three-day period. Finding Include: Review of the facility policy titled Medication Management Program last revised 01/15/25 revealed, The Facility implements a Medication Management program to meet the pharmaceutical needs of patients and residents, according to established standards of practice and regulatory requirements .Administering the Medication Pass . 15. If a medication is unavailable, contact the pharmacy and document accordingly. Notify physician for possible alternatives available in e-kits at time of discovery. Review of R6's Face Sheet revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including but not limited to: pain, spondylosis with radiculopathy, parkinsonism and hemiplegia and hemiparesis. Review of R6's significant change in status Minimum Data Set Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/10/25, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 out of 15, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Review of R6's Physician Order Report dated 04/25 showed an active order, originally started on 03/20/24, for Oxycodone 10 milligrams (mg), four times daily (QID) with special instructions to notify MD [as needed] PRN. Review of the Pharmacy Delivery Manifest revealed the following deliveries of Oxycodone 10 mg: 1. 03/12/25, 4:10 AM - Two packs of 30 tablets. 2. 03/28/25, 4:19 AM - 28 tablet. 3. 04/13/25, 11:19 PM - Three packs of 30 tablets and one pack of 28 tablets. Review of a Controlled Drug Receipt/Record/Disposition Form dated 03/28/25, revealed, a total of 58 tablets of Oxycodone 10 mg were received. However, no medication administration was recorded from 04/11/25 at 12:00 AM to 04/14/25 at 12:00 AM. Review of R6's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for the period 04/01/25 - 04/30/25, revealed six missed doses of Oxycodone 10 mg from 04/11/25 through 04/14/25, with the following documentation noted: 1. 04/12/25 at 12:00 AM - Not given: Medication unavailable (noted on 04/11/25 at 11:28 PM). 2. 04/12/25 at 6:00 AM - Not given: Medication unavailable (noted on 04/12/25 at 5:44 AM). 3. 04/13/25 at 12:00 AM - Not given: Medication unavailable (noted on 04/12/25 at 11:21 PM). 4. 04/13/25 at 6:00 AM - Not given: Medication unavailable (noted on 04/13/25 at 5:34 AM). 5. 04/13/25 at 12:00 PM - Not given: Medication unavailable (noted on 04/13/25 at 12:20 PM). 6. 04/13/25 at 6:00 PM - Not given: Awaiting delivery from pharmacy (noted on 04/13/25 at 5:46 PM). Review of R6's Electronic Medical Record did not reveal documentation to indicate the facility staff attempted to obtain the medication through an emergency supply system, or that the pharmacy was notified. During an interview on 05/04/25 at 11:43 AM, R6 stated, I am scheduled to receive oxycodone every 6 hours due to pains in my legs, but on several occasions, I've gone without my pain medication. During an interview on 05/06/25 at 9:18 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)1 stated, All nurses are responsible for monitor medications and place orders for more if we notice that it is running low. When medication levels are low, we can initiate a refill directly in the MAR during medication passes. However, with narcotics, we typically remove the medication sticker and fax it to the pharmacy for a refill. During an interview on 05/06/25 at 9:31 AM, the Director of Nursing stated, When a narcotic medication runs out, a new prescription is required. The nurse currently passing medications should have contacted the pharmacy or physician if the medication was unavailable. All nurses have access to the Emergency (E-Kit), and they have been trained to use it in situations like this. Additionally, the nurses could have contacted the physician for an order for pain management or to replenish the medication from the E-Kit to control the resident's pain.
Oct 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain infection prevention and control practices designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain infection prevention and control practices designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. This was evidenced by medication administration observations of Resident (R)1 and R18. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Hand Hygiene/Handwashing dated 5/15/23 documented, Procedures: 1. Hand hygiene/hand washing is done: Before: A. Before patient/resident contact .After: .B. After patient/resident contact. C. After contact with a contaminated object or source where there is a concentration of microorganisms, such as, mucous membranes, non-intact skin, body fluids, blood or wounds .J. Contact with environmental surfaces in the immediate vicinity of patients/residents. Review of the facility policy titled, Blood Glucose Monitoring dated 5/5/23 documented, .If the manufacturer doesn't specify how the device should be cleaned and disinfected, then it shouldn't be shared. Review of the facility policy titled, Infection Prevention and Control Policies and Procedures dated 5/15/23 documented, Subject: Transmission Based/Standard Precautions, and Enhanced Barrier Precautions, Standard Precautions vs. Transmission Based Precautions .B. Personal Protective Equipment: determined by the nature of staff interaction, extent of anticipated blood, body fluid or pathogen exposure. Appropriate use of PPE includes but is not limited to: Gloves .4) Remove gloves promptly after use, before touching non-contaminated items and environmental surfaces, and before going to another patient/resident .E. Patient/Resident-Care Equipment .2) Verify that reusable equipment is cleaned, disinfected, and reprocessed appropriately. Review of R1's electronic medical records, revealed an admission date of 3/6/24, and diagnosis list that consisted of Type Two (2) Diabetes Mellitus with Diabetic Neuropathy, Acute Osteomyelitis unspecified femur, Acquired Absence of Right Leg Above the Knee, Cardiomyopathy among other conditions not listed. Resident #1 Physician's Orders showed an order for Insulin Aspart U-100 solution; per sliding scale to be given subcutaneously four (4) times a day. In an observation on 10/7/24 at 11:31 a.m. made during medication administration of R1, Registered Nurse (RN)1 was seen placing the gauze, an open alcohol swab, the glucometer and gloves on the seat of a chair in the resident's room, with no barrier underneath, while donning Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) gown after performing hand hygiene. Then RN1 put on gloves and gathered the supplies. Next RN #1 placed the same supplies on the resident's bed, wiped the resident's finger with the opened alcohol swab and performed the finger stick to check R1's blood glucose. The first attempt was unsuccessful, so RN1 wiped the resident's finger with the same swab and made a second attempt to collect a blood sample. After collecting the sample and getting the resident's blood glucose reading, RN1 took off her gloves and set them on the resident's bed, doffed the PPE gown, returned to their assigned medication cart and placed the glucometer inside without cleaning or disinfecting it. Review of R18's electronic medical records, revealed a current admission date of 9/1/21, and also the latest return admission date of 8/12/24 and diagnosis list that consisted of Type Two (2) Diabetes Mellitus without complications, Chronic Kidney Disease, Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Skin among other conditions not listed. R18's Physician's Orders showed an order for Humalog U- 100 solution Insulin: per sliding scale to be given subcutaneously three (3) times a day. An observation on 10/7/24 at 11:38 AM, made during medication administration of R18 revealed RN1 performed hand hygiene, walked into the resident's restroom to get a pair of gloves, and was seen placing the gauze, an open alcohol swab, the glucometer and gloves on the resident's bedside table with no barrier underneath. RN1 wiped the resident's finger with the opened alcohol swab and performed the finger stick to check R18's blood glucose. The first attempt was unsuccessful, so RN1 wiped the resident's finger with the same swab and made a second attempt to collect a blood sample. After collecting the sample and getting the resident's blood glucose reading, RN1 returned to their assigned medication cart and placed the glucometer inside without cleaning or disinfecting it. RN1 returned to R18's room to administer the resident's medication. RN1 performed hand hygiene, then touched the resident's restroom door, donned gloves, then with gloved hands touched the restroom door to close the door and administered insulin injection to R18. In an interview with RN1 on 10/7/24 at 11:45 AM, she stated that there was no reason why they placed the items down without a barrier underneath, only used one alcohol swab, or did not clean glucometer between residents. RN1 did state that they understood the reason for infection control, but felt that the facility layout made it difficult, saying, It's kind of hard here, I get it, but it is nit-picky. In an interview on 10/9/24 at 8:56 AM with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)1, the current unit nurse manager on they stated that the expectation was to improve on infection control, putting down barriers, hand sanitizer use, for the safety of residents and staff and to re-educate. In an interview on 10/9/24 at 9:17 AM with the Director of Nursing (DON) and the Administrator, the DON stated that the expectation was to do better, and that RN1 said that they knew better and should not have exhibited those behaviors. The Administrator stated that re-education with staff had already occurred.
Jun 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0760 (Tag F0760)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, interviews, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure 1 out of 3 residents was fr...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, interviews, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure 1 out of 3 residents was free from significant medication errors for 1 out of 30 days for the month April 2024. Resident (R)1 received Lyrica; 1 capsule by mouth, 1 time a day and Norco 325 milligrams (mg); 1 tablet, 2 times a day. R1's Controlled Drug Receipt/Record/Disposition Form revealed medication was pulled and reported not administered, which heightened the likelihood of a decline in medical conditions. Findings include: Review of facility's policy titled, Medication Management Program with a revision date of 05/05/23 documented under Administering Medication Pass (8) The authorized staff member or licensed nurse must identify the resident before administering any medication. Review of R1's Face Sheet revealed R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to;anxiety, dementia, chronic obstruction pulmonary disease and heart failure. Review of R1's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/15/24 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, indicating R1 is cognitively intact. Review of R1's Medication Administration History documented the following orders for April 22, 2024: Lyrica 25 mg; 1 time a day (10am) for muscle weakness; Hydrocodone-acetaminophen; twice a day (10:00AM and 9:00PM) for pain. Review of R1's Controlled Drug Receipt/Record/Disposition Form dated 04/08/24 for Pregabalin cap 25 mg, generic for Lyrica, documented on 04/22/24 signature signed off as administered by Registered Nurse (RN)1. Hydrocodone/APAP tab 325 mg generic for Norco, 1 tablet by mouth two times a day as needed for pain signature signed off on 04/22/24, as administered by RN1. Review of RN1's Suspension Pending Investigation dated 04/23/24 documented the suspension of RN1 for the allegation of medication administration errors. Review of RN1's Corrective Action Form dated 05/03/24 documented violation of facility policy action required: termination of RN1. In an interview on 06/03/24 at 11:24 AM in resident's room, R1 stated he remembered when he didn't get his medication. R1 stated the administration of medication on both halls are very strange because he is included on the South Hall, when he resides on the North Hall. In an interview on 06/03/24 at 1:37AM, RN1 stated she was running behind all day, she stated she was new to hall and the halls are split, it's confusing. RN1 stated when she got to R1, he was not in his room, and she thought he wanted dialysis. She stated she was working with a new orientee, and she had checked back several times. RN1stated when she was asked if R1 received his medications that day, she was honest and stated she hadn't given them to him. RN1 stated she told the truth. RN1 stated she had pulled the narcotic medications, but did not administer them. R1 stated she pulled and wasted the narcotic medications. RN1 stated to dispose, you must have two signatures. RN1 stated she had the new orientee to sign off the medication narcotic sheet witnessing she disposed of the medications. RN1 stated she could not remember the new orientee's name. In an interview on 06/03/24 at 2:28 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated that RN1 stated she disposed of meds. DON stated the disposition of the meds should be listed on the narcotic sheet with two signatures, one as a witness; but this was not done on R1's narcotic sheet. DON stated RN1 admitted to her she did not administer the medications on that day to R1. In an interview on 06/03/24 at 3:16 PM, Administrator stated she expects Nursing staff not to pull medications until the resident is standing in front of them.
Apr 2024 8 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on records reviews and interviews, the facility failed to implement the Comprehensive Plan of Care for Resident (R)24 rela...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on records reviews and interviews, the facility failed to implement the Comprehensive Plan of Care for Resident (R)24 related to a significant weight loss for 1 of 2 residents reviewed with a significant weight loss. The facility further failed to implement the Comprehensive Plan of Care related to the provision of activities of interest for R24 to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable-physical, mental and psychosocial well being for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for activities. Findings include: The facility admitted R24 on 01/31/24 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, depression, anxiety, bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. Review on 04/22/24 at 01:55 PM of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3 out of 15, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Review on 04/22/24 at 01:55 PM of the medical record for R24 revealed the following weights: On 02/01/24, R24 weighed 243.8 pounds. This was the weight on admission. On 02/05/24, R24 weighed 239.0 pounds. On 02/06/24, R24 weighed 237.6 pounds. On 02/13/24, R24 weighed 224.6 pounds. On 03/09/24, R24 weighed 215.8 pounds. On 03/11/24, R24 weighed 218.6 pounds. On 03/12/24, R24 weighed 215.6 pounds. On 03/19/24, R24 weighed 213.8 pounds. On 03/26/24, R24 weighed 213.8 pounds. On 04/02/24, R24 weighed 211.2 pounds. On 04/09/24, R25 weighed 215.0 pounds. Total weight loss from 01/31/24 until 04/09/24 is 28.8 pounds. Review on 04/22/24 at 02:10 PM of the Comprehensive Plan of Care revealed a nutritional status problem area and states: Resident is at risk for malnutrition. She is receiving a regular diet with thin liquids. The goal dated 02/01/24 reads: Resident will maintain nutritional status as evidenced by no significant weight change through next review. The interventions listed are: Encourage to dine in dining room as is appropriate, honor food preferences as feasible, monitor and encourage intakes of foods and fluids, offer alternates if intakes are less than adequate. Monitor weights, skin report, and labs per policy, offer snacks per policy, provide assistance with meals and snack if needed and provide diet as ordered by the physician. During an interview on 04/23/24 at 10:00 AM with the Registered Dietician (RD), he stated that he put in an order for a dietary supplement today. The RD was asked what interventions were put into place to prevent significant weight loss, and he stated, R24 was obese and sometimes weight loss is a good thing. The RD was asked how he found out about weight loss and he stated that he looks at the weights in the computer by just looking them up, but no one informs him of weight loss within the residents. During an interview on 04/23/24 at 12:05 PM with the Director of Nursing concerning the weight loss, she stated that her expectations were that staff would notify the physician and the RD. She stated that she will look at weights from time to time and staff do offer the resident snacks, eventhough there is no documentation to ensure the snacks are offered or consumed. Review on 04/22/24 at 3:18 PM of the activity attendance sheets for R24 revealed no one to one activities, and no activities documented for February 24 and only socialization for March 24. Review on 04/22/24 at 3:48 PM of the Comprehensive Plan of Care R24 revealed a problem area of activities and states: Resident is non-verbal and will be receiving one to one visits with documentation by activity staff in an effort to meet her physical, emotional, and intellectual needs. The goal states: Resident will actively participate in one on one visits with activity staff until next review. The interventions start date is 03/18/24 and include, staff will provide one to one pet therapy, staff will provide one to one religious visits, one on one music hour, and one to one reading. Staff will provide one on one socialization. Staff will observe and document her participation level during activities. Staff will provide one on one outdoor activities, staff will provide one to one beauty/barber as tolerated. Staff will provide manicures as tolerated and staff will provide monthly activity calendar. No documentation could be found in the medical record for R24 to ensure R24 was receiving the one to one activities. During an interview on 04/23/24 at 09:00 AM with the Activity Director, this surveyor had her to take a look at the activity attendance sheets she had provided to me for January, February and March 24. She stated this resident has been in and out of the hospital. I asked her about the Comprehensive Plan of Care which had a start date of 03/18/24 for one to ones, and she did provide a sheet from 04/01/24 through 04/22/24. She confirmed that no one to one activities as listed on the plan of care were provided to R24 and no activities were offered or documented in February '24.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to monitor behaviors and medication side effects for Res...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to monitor behaviors and medication side effects for Resident (R)60 and 20 for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Nursing Policies and Procedures Subject: Medication Management Program revision date 05/05/23 revealed, Policy: The Facility implements a Medication Management program to meet the pharmaceutical needs of patients and residents, according to established standards of practice and regulatory requirements. Scope and Roles: 3. Licensed nurses will evaluate, assess, monitor, document and report the effectiveness of the medication regimen that includes all medications and supplements prescribed to treat illness, disease process, or enhance the patient's/resident's quality of life. Guidelines for Implementing an Efficient Medication Pass: 1B. The facility will ensure the schedules for administering medications: 1) Maximize the effectiveness of the medications. 2) Prevent potential for significant medication interactions .Preparing for the Medication Pass 8. Documentation of medications administered is completed according to State and Federal requirements. The initials and verifying signature are generally required. Administering the Medication Pass 11. Immediately after administering the medication to the resident, the authorized staff or licensed nurse will return to the medication cart and document medication administration with initials on the MAR. If a medication is not administered, the authorized staff or licensed nurse must explain why it was not given. Review of R60's Face Sheet revealed R60 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to: acute respiratory failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus, major depressive disorder, and myocardial infarction. Review of R60's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/19/24 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, indicating R60 was cognitively intact. Review of R60's Care Plan with a start date of 11/05/2020 and target date 05/24/2024 documented, the problem: R60 .has potential for discomfort & adverse effects r/t [related to] use of antipsychotic & antidepressant medications. Documented goal: R60 .will be free of discomfort or adverse effects of antipsychotic & antidepressant use through next review. Documented approach revealed, Observe for muscle rigidity, increased temp, hypotension, dry mouth, sedation, tremors, tardive dyskinesia, increased confusion, change in LOC, sudden change in mood/behavior status. Additionally, the care plan documented, the problem: R60 .has potential for side effects r/t use of multiple rx [prescription]. Documented goal: R60 .will experience no drug related side effects. Documented approach revealed, Observe for inc confusions, insomnia, nervousness, tremors, changes in loc, dec appetite, wt loss. Additionally, the care plan documented, the problem: R60 .has hx [history] of verbally abusive behavioral symptoms. Documented goal: R60 .will have a decreased number of verbally abusive episodes through next review. Documented approach revealed, Assess whether the behavior endangers the resident and/or others. Intervene if necessary. The care plan had a start date of 03/15/21 and target date 05/24/24, documented the problem: R60 .has potential for difficulty falling asleep & [and] remaining asleep r/t [related to] dx [diagnosis] of Insomnia. Documented goal: R60 .will be comfortable as evidenced by verbalization of getting enough sleep most of the night through next review. Documented approach revealed, Meds as ordered per MD. Review of R60's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for 04/01/24 - 04/22/24 revealed an order for Behavior Monitoring twice daily: ANTIDEPRESSANT Drug ** DULOXETINE. CRYING/SADNESS. Special Instructions: INTERVENTIONS: A: Physical Needs Met B: Distraction C: Redirection D: Validation E: Activity Program F: Quiet Time/Rest G: Increased Observation H: Other I: No interventions needed OUTCOMES: 1. Improved, 2. Unchanged, W. Worsened Twice A Day 07:00 - 19:00, 19:00 - 07:00. The MAR also revealed an order for, Behavior Monitoring twice daily: ANTIPSYCHOTIC Drug Use **CRYING/SADNESS Special Instructions: INTERVENTIONS: A: Physical Needs Met B: Distraction C: Redirection D: Validation E: Activity Program F: Quiet Time/Rest G: Increased Observation H: Removal of Stressors J: Other K: No interventions needed OUTCOMES: 1. Improved, 2. Unchanged, Twice A Day 07:00 - 19:00, 19:00 - 07:00. The MAR also revealed an order for, Behavior Monitoring twice daily: HYPNOTIC Drug Use **MELATONIN. CHANGES IN SLEEP PATTERN. Special Instructions: INTERVENTIONS: A: Physical Needs Met B: Distraction C: Redirection D: Validation E: Activity Program F: Quiet Time/Rest G: Increased Observation H: Removal of Stressors J: Other K: No interventions needed OUTCOMES: 1. Improved, 2. Unchanged, Twice A Day 07:00 - 19:00, 19:00 - 07:00. The MAR also revealed an order for, Monitor for side effects twice daily: ANTIDEPRESSANTS Special Instructions: SIDE EFFECTS: 0. NONE 1. Dry Mouth 2. Blurred Vision 3. Constipation 4. Urinary Retention 5. Hypotension 6. Appetite Changes 7. Headache 8. Insomnia 9. Dyspepsia 10. Weight Changes 11. Suicidal ideations; Wishes of death; Attempts to harm self Twice A Day 07:00 - 19:00, 19:00 - 07:00. The MAR also revealed an order for, Monitor for side effects twice daily: ANTIPSYCHOTIC DRUG USE Special Instructions: SIDE EFFECT CODES: 0. NONE 1. Neck Stiffness 2. Confusion 3. Muscle Rigidity 4. Involuntary Movements 5. Drooling 6. Tremors 7. Restlessness 8. Sleep Disturbances 9. Dry Mouth 10. Blurred Vision 11. Constipation 12. Sedation Twice A Day 07:00 - 19:00, 19:00 - 07:00. The MAR also revealed an order for, Monitor for side effects twice daily: HYPNOTICS Special Instructions: SIDE EFFECT CODES: 0. NONE 1. Sedation 2. Dizziness 3. Confusion 4. Nightmares 5. Daytime Anxiety 6. Hallucinations 7. Fatigue 8. Headache 9. Sedation Twice A Day 07:00 - 19:00, 19:00 - 07:00. Review of R60's Physician Order with a start date of 02/13/24 documented, Behavior Monitoring twice daily: ANTIDEPRESSANT Drug ** DULOXETINE. CRYING/SADNESS. Special Instructions: INTERVENTIONS: A: Physical Needs Met B: Distraction C: Redirection D: Validation E: Activity Program F: Quiet Time/Rest G: Increased Observation H: Other I: No interventions needed OUTCOMES: 1. Improved, 2. Unchanged, W. Worsened Twice A Day 07:00 - 19:00, 19:00 - 07:00. The MAR also revealed an order for, Behavior Monitoring twice daily: ANTIPSYCHOTIC Drug Use **CRYING/SADNESS Special Instructions: INTERVENTIONS: A: Physical Needs Met B: Distraction C: Redirection D: Validation E: Activity Program F: Quiet Time/Rest G: Increased Observation H: Removal of Stressors J: Other K: No interventions needed OUTCOMES: 1. Improved, 2. Unchanged, Twice A Day 07:00 - 19:00, 19:00 - 07:00. The MAR also revealed an order for, Behavior Monitoring twice daily: HYPNOTIC Drug Use **MELATONIN. CHANGES IN SLEEP PATTERN. Special Instructions: INTERVENTIONS: A: Physical Needs Met B: Distraction C: Redirection D: Validation E: Activity Program F: Quiet Time/Rest G: Increased Observation H: Removal of Stressors J: Other K: No interventions needed OUTCOMES: 1. Improved, 2. Unchanged, Twice A Day 07:00 - 19:00, 19:00 - 07:00. The MAR also revealed an order for, Monitor for side effects twice daily: ANTIDEPRESSANTS Special Instructions: SIDE EFFECTS: 0. NONE 1. Dry Mouth 2. Blurred Vision 3. Constipation 4. Urinary Retention 5. Hypotension 6. Appetite Changes 7. Headache 8. Insomnia 9. Dyspepsia 10. Weight Changes 11. Suicidal ideations; Wishes of death; Attempts to harm self Twice A Day 07:00 - 19:00, 19:00 - 07:00. The MAR also revealed an order for, Monitor for side effects twice daily: ANTIPSYCHOTIC DRUG USE Special Instructions: SIDE EFFECT CODES: 0. NONE 1. Neck Stiffness 2. Confusion 3. Muscle Rigidity 4. Involuntary Movements 5. Drooling 6. Tremors 7. Restlessness 8. Sleep Disturbances 9. Dry Mouth 10. Blurred Vision 11. Constipation 12. Sedation Twice A Day 07:00 - 19:00, 19:00 - 07:00. The MAR also revealed an order for, Monitor for side effects twice daily: HYPNOTICS Special Instructions: SIDE EFFECT CODES: 0. NONE 1. Sedation 2. Dizziness 3. Confusion 4. Nightmares 5. Daytime Anxiety 6. Hallucinations 7. Fatigue 8. Headache 9. Sedation Twice A Day 07:00 - 19:00, 19:00 - 07:00. During an interview on 04/23/24 at 11:42 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated that her expectations are that physician orders are followed for medication administration. She reported that the facility ensures accuracy of documentation on the MAR by pulling a compliance report daily and either the DON or Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) addresses identified issues. Education is provided to staff. She stated that unfortunately they use a lot of agency nurses, which makes it challenging. During an interview on 04/23/24 at 4:34 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)1 verified that there was no documentation for behavior monitoring related to antidepressant use on 04/19/24 at the 7A-7P timeframe on the MAR, no documentation for side effect monitoring related to antipsychotic use on 04/19/24 at the 7A-7P and 7P-7A timeframes on the MAR, and no documentation for side effect monitoring related to hypnotic use on 04/19/24 at the 7A-7P timeframe on the MAR. LPN1 stated that the expectation is to have this documentation completed by the end of the shift. A review of the facility policy titled, Pharmacy Services Policies and Procedures- Medication Management, revised 04/01/2022, indicated the facility will ensure that each resident's entire drug/medication regimen is managed and monitored to promote or maintain the resident's highest practicable mental, physical, and psychosocial wellbeing. R20 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including but not limited to, schizoaffective disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, urinary tract infection, bipolar disorder, depressive episodes, and dementia. A review of R20's annual MDS with an ARD of 04/10/24, indicated R20 is ordered to take, but is not limited to, antipsychotic and antidepressant medications. A review of R20's care plan indicated a potential for discomfort & adverse effects related to the use of antipsychotic and antidepressant medications. A review of R20's care plan and progress notes did not reveal that R20 refused medications on 04/15/24 or 04/16/24. A review of R20's physician orders indicate Monitor for side effects every shift: Antipsychotic Drug Use with a start date of 07/13/2023, Monitor for side effects twice daily: Anticonvulsant with a start date of 07/26/2023, Monitor for side effects twice daily: Antidepressant with a start date of 07/13/2023. A review of R20's Behavior Monitoring Administration History, from 04/01/2024 until 04/23/2024, indicated that R20 did not receive Behavior Monitoring Every Shift: Antipsychotic Drug Use- Olanzapine, Behavior Monitoring twice daily: Anticonvulsant Drug- Depakote, Behavior Monitoring twice daily: Antidepressant- Trazadone/Paxil, Monitor for side effects every shift: Antipsychotic Drug Use, Monitor for side effects twice daily: Anticonvulsant, and Monitor for side effects twice daily: Antidepressants on 04/15/2024 during the day shift. During an interview on 04/23/24 at 03:00 PM, the DON expressed they expect nurses to document the MAR and TAR once completing a task ordered by the physician. The DON confirmed that there were several blanks on R20's TAR and MAR for April 2024, but was unsure why there were several blanks.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0692 (Tag F0692)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Review of R91's Face Sheet revealed R91 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to; seps...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Review of R91's Face Sheet revealed R91 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to; sepsis, mycosis, pain, dysphagia, muscle weakness, long term use of opiate analgesic, nausea, constipation, major depressive disorder, urinary tract infection, diabetes, anxiety disorder, unsteadiness, lack of coordination, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of R91's Quarterly MDS with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD ) of 03/18/24 revealed a BIMS score of 05 out of 15, indicating R91 has severe cognitive deficits. Review of R91's Nutrition note dated 04/09/24, revealed the Reason for Referral: Weight Review. Diet Order: Pureed with thin liquids. Supplements: Glucerna and Sugar free ice cream with lunch/dinner. Documented intake: Poor. Snacks provided appropriately, HS. Weight: 121.6 pounds (lbs)(4/7/24); 125 pounds (3/13/24); 142 pounds (1/23/24); 166 pounds (10/10/23). BMI: 19.04. Medications reviewed. Skin Integrity intact. Blood glucose values within target goal range X ~ 30 days. Nutrition Diagnosis: 1) Unintended weight loss related to intake as evidenced by significant decrease-CONTINUE. 2) Diet consistency difficulty related to chronic condition as evidenced by mechanically altered diet-CONTINUE. Summary: Poor intake continues, family providing Ensure - resident accepts well. Note GI referral due to persistent vomiting. Undesired weight loss continues. Recommendations/Plan: 1) Discontinue Glucerna 2) Add Ensure Plus or equivalent TID 3) RDN available PRN or when nutrition status changes; will follow as needed. 4) Weights as ordered. Goals: 1) Maintain a healthy weight status without further significant/severe change. 2) Maintain skin integrity. 3) Tolerate PO. Review R91's of Progress Note dated 03/19/24 documented, Nutrition Note. Reason for Referral: Quarterly Review and Weight Review. Diet Order: Pureed with thin liquids. Supplements: Glucerna with lunch/dinner. Documented intake: Poor. Snacks provided appropriately, HS. Weight: 125 pounds (3/13/24); 132 pounds (2/6/24); 150 pounds (12/5/23); 181.6 pounds (9/15/23). BMI: 19.58. Medications include Cyproheptadine, Omeprazole, Mirtazapine and Vitamin D. Skin Integrity intact. Blood glucose values within target goal range X ~ 30 days. Nutrition Diagnosis: 1) Unintended weight loss related to intake as evidenced by significant decrease-CONTINUE. 2) Diet consistency difficulty related to chronic condition as evidenced by mechanically altered diet. Summary: Diet downgraded 3/15/24, which may be contributing to continued poor intake-receiving 2 appetite stimulants (second added recently and to increase mg) and supplements to encourage intake. Undesired weight loss continues, although it has slowed recently. Skin intact. Blood glucose values within target goal range. Recommendations/Plan: 1) Continue plan of care. 2) RDN available PRN or when nutrition status changes; will follow as needed. 3) Weights as ordered. Goals: 1) Maintain a healthy weight status without further significant/severe decrease. 2) Maintain skin integrity. 3) Tolerate. No changes were made even after a steady weight loss and a noted -7.04 weight loss in March. Review of R91's weights on Electronic Medical System revealed for the past six months from November 2023 to April 24, he lost -23.62 lbs. R91's weights were recorded as follows: 04/07/24 - 121.6 lbs 03/13/24 -125 lbs. 02/06/24-132 lbs. 01/23/24-142 lbs. 12/05/23-150.0 lbs. 11/04/23-159.2 lbs. Review of R91's Intake report from 11/01/2023 to 04/23/24 documented minimum intake of meals and fluids. During an interview on 04/23/24 at 9:59 AM, the RD acknowledged R91's weight loss. He stated they added ensure and sugar free ice cream, but in March '24, the RD noted weight loss, but they did not make any additional revisions to address weight loss. During an interview on 04/23/24 at 12:11 PM, the DON stated, she expects staff to notify the Doctor and RD if there is a weight loss. She stated if she is aware of a noted weight loss, she will intervene. She stated she would let the doctor know and notify the RD. She stated she pulls weights often. She stated R91 has an upcoming appointment for digestive problems. Based on review of the facility policy titled,Weighing the Resident, records reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)24 and R91 received care and services to prevent significant weight loss or to decrease the likelihood of further weight loss for 2 of 2 residents reviewed with significant weight loss. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Weighing the Resident, states as the policy statement, Patient/Resident weights will be recorded and monitored at least monthly. Under the section on titled, Procedures states, 2. If the month-to-month weight shows more than a five-percent gain or loss, the patient/resident is reweighed in the presence of licensed personnel. 3. Record all weights per facility protocol. 4. If there is an actual 5% or more gain or loss in one month, notify the patient/resident/family, physician, and the Registered Dietician. Document this notification per facility protocol. 5. The facility Dietitian reviews the patient's/resident's nutritional status and makes recommendations for intervention if significant weight change is noted. 7. Update the plan of care with goals and approaches/interventions listed. 9. Unplanned and undesired weight variance will be evaluated for significance utilizing the following guidelines: 3% in one week; 5% in 30 days; 7.5% in 90 days; 10% in 180 days. The facility admitted R24 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, depression, anxiety, bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. Review on 04/22/24 at 01:55 PM of the admission minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3 out of 15, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Review on 04/22/24 at 01:55 PM of the medical record for R24 revealed the following weights: On 02/01/24, R24 weighed 243.8 pounds. This was the weight on admission. On 02/05/24,R24 weighed 239.0 pounds. On 02/06/24, R24 weighed 237.6 pounds. On 02/13/24, R24 weighed 224.6 pounds. On 03/09/24, R24 weighed 215.8 pounds. On 03/11/24, R24 weighed 218.6 pounds. On 03/12/24, R24 weighed 215.6 pounds. On 03/19/24, R24 weighed 213.8 pounds. On 03/26/24, R24 weighed 213.8 pounds. On 04/02/24, R24 weighed 211.2 pounds. On 04/09/24, R25 weighed 215.0 pounds. Total weight loss from 01/31/24 until 04/09/24 is 28.8 pounds. During an interview on 04/23/24 at 10:00 AM with the Registered Dietician (RD), he stated that he put in an order for a dietary supplement today. He went on to say that the resident had been in the hospital. He stated R24 was obese and sometimes weight loss is a good thing. I informed him that unless the physician orders a weight loss program then interventions should be put into place to ensure the residents do not have significant weight loss. I asked how he found out about weight loss and he stated that he looks at the weights in the computer by just looking them up. No one notifies him of weight loss. I also stated that a dietitian note had recommended a supplement but was not ordered. During an interview on 04/23/24 at 12:05 PM with the Director of Nursing (DON) concerning the weight loss, she stated that her expectations were that staff would notify the physician and the RD. She stated that she will look at weights from time to time. She stated that staff do offer the resident snacks, eventhough there is no documentation to ensure the snacks are offered or consumed.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0730 (Tag F0730)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on review of the facility policy, staffing documentation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that each Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) employed by the facility received the required n...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on review of the facility policy, staffing documentation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that each Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) employed by the facility received the required no less than 12 hours of in-service education based on their individual performance reviews and is calculated by their employment date with the facility during review of Sufficient and Competent Nurse Staffing. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Staff Education/Orientation Policies and Procedures, without a date or revision date listed. The policy states, The facility will provide orientation and training to fulfilling the organization's mission thus creating a culture that foster staff self development and continued learning. (1). Day 1: All new employees receive the general facility orientation program on day one of employment and it is completed with the designated member of the facility staff. (2). Day 2: Each new employee will receive their specific department orientation starting on day 2 and continue through to completion of the department specific orientation. Role and department specific orientation includes any state or local level requirements that are in addition to or more inclusive than federal requirements. (3). Individualized: The facility leadership has the discretion to increase the new employee's orientation if deemed necessary. (4). Annually: The employee completes the competency/performance evaluation(s) and educational requirements according to state specific regulation. Review on 04/23/24 at approximately 11:45 AM of the facility's CNA annual 12-hour in-service training based on performance reviews revealed less than the required 12 hours of training from the date of hire for CNAs. There was no documentation in the CNA's personnel files that verified the required training. There were 3 out of 5 CNAs who did not receive training in resident's rights, abuse, neglect, exploitation, and dementia training; CNA2 hire date 05/23/19, CNA3 hire date 02/01/23, and CNA5 hire date 03/10/23 revealed no training of the required areas. During an interview on 04/23/24 at approximately at 3:42 PM with the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed, to ensure the staff are competent and have the knowledge and skills to care for the residents, they attend an annual training and a skills check. If there are any concerns, we will provide additional training. DON stated staff are evaluated by the staff development coordinator to ensure competency levels. The DON confirmed the staff had not met their required hours.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Unnecessary Medications (Tag F0759)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Management Program with a revision date of 05/05/23 documented under Preparin...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Management Program with a revision date of 05/05/23 documented under Preparing for Medication Pass, Section Q (4), Authorized staff must understand: (D) The 8 Rights for administering medication: (4). The Right Time (6). The Right Charting (7). Medications are administered no more than one hour before to one hour after the designated medication pass time. Review of R5's Face Sheet revealed R5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to; chronic kidney disease, muscle weakness, peripheral vascular disease, lack of coordination, insomnia, diabetes, anxiety disorder, dementia, chronic obstruction pulmonary disease and heart failure. Review of R5's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD ) of 02/15/24 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, indicating R5 is cognitively intact. Review of R5's Medication Administration Record for March '24 revealed the following medication errors: Advair Diskus (fluticasone propion-salmeterol); two times daily (10am/9pm) for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary disease was charted late 25% for the month. Daily multi-vitamin (multivitamin) tablet; once daily (9am) for Vitamin D deficiency was charted late 12% for the month. Eliquis 5 milligrams (mg); 2 times daily (10am/9pm) for heart failure, charted late; 29% for the month. Folic Acid 1 mg; 1 time daily (10am) for Vitamin D deficiency; charted late; 12% for the month. Furosemide 40 mg; 2 times daily (10am/9pm) for renal dialysis; charted late; 25% for the month. Lyrica 25 mg; 1 time a day (10am) for muscle weakness; charted late; 19% for the month. Melatonin 3 mg; 1 time a day (9pm) for insomnia; charted late; 12% for the month. Metoprolol tartrate 25 mg; 2 times a daily (10am/9pm) for peripheral vascular disease; charted late; 25% for the month. Pantoprazole 20 mg; 2 times daily (10am/10pm) for gastro-esophageal reflux disease; charted late; 12% for the month. Paroxetine HCl 30 mg; 1 time daily (9pm) for anxiety; charted late; 12% for the month. PreserVision AREDS-2 (vit c,e-zn-coppr-lutein-zeaxan) capsule; 250-90-40-1 mg; 1 time daily (10am); charted late; 12% for the month. Pro-Stat AWC (amino acids-protein hydrolys) liquid; 17-100 gram-kcal/30 mL; 2 times a day(10am/9pm); charted late 9% for the month. Procardia XL 30 mg; 1 time daily (10am) for hyperparathyroidism; charted late 16% for the month. Ropinirole .25 mg; 1 time daily (9pm) for cramps (hyperparathyroidism); charted late 12% for the month. Sevelamer carbonate 800 mg; 3 times daily (10am/2pm/9pm) for chronic kidney disease; charted late 29% for the month. Tradjenta 5 mg; 1 time daily (10am) for Diabetes; charted late 16% for the month. Trazodone 50 mg; 1 time daily (9pm) for anxiety; charted late 12% for the month. Tums 200 mg; 1 time daily (10am) for dependence on renal dialysis; charted late 16% for the month. Vitamin C 500 mg; 1 time daily (10am) for chronic kidney disease; charted late 16% for the month. In an interview on 04/23/24 at 3:53 PM, Director of Nursing stated her expectations is for staff to administer medications within the one-hour window before and after scheduled times and document immediately thereafter. In an interview on 04/23/23 at 4:25 PM, Administrator stated she expects medication to be given within the time frame of medication administration or one hour before or after. Based on Staff Education/Orientation for administering Insulin via an Insulin Pen, record reviews, observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a medication administration error rate of less than 5 percent. The medication error rate was 10.71 percent (%). Additionally, R5's medications were administered and charted late for 22 out of 31 days in March '24. Findings Include: Review of the facility's Staff Education/Orientation Policies and Procedures, the nursing,Competency: Medication Administration-Insulin Pen, states under Priming The Pen, 1. Remove the outer needle cap and dial 2 units. 2. Point the pen up and press the plunger button to expel 2 units of insulin. 3. Repeat these steps as needed until a drop or stream of insulin appears at the needle tip. NOTE: A new pen may have to be primed up to 6 times before it will expel insulin. 4. Shake the insulin off the needle top. During an observation on 04/22/24 at 08:22 AM of medication administration revealed Registered Nurse (RN)1 administering Miralax 17 grams (g) to R84. RN1 measured the 17 grams and emptied it into a 5 ounce (oz.) cup and then added water. The Miralax is to be mixed in 6 to 8 ounces of a liquid for administration. RN1 was not available for interview. An observation on 04/23/24 at 08:30 AM of medication administration revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)1 administering Lantus Insulin via an Insulin Pen to R90. The resident was to receive 45 units. The insulin pen only had 42 units after the priming of the pen so LPN1 opened a second Lantus Pen for the resident. LPN1 took an alcohol wipe and cleaned the rubber stopper on the end of the pen, then applied the insulin needle. She dialed up the 2 units for priming the pen and did not remove the cover from the needle and held the pen horizontally and pushed the dose button to expel the 2 units used to prime the pen and then dialed up the 42 units for the dosage to be administered to the resident. LPN1 then opened the new Lantus Insulin Pen and cleaned the rubber stopper on the end of the pen and applied the needle leaving the needle covered and holding the pen horizontally she pushed the dose button to expel the 2 units she had dialed up to prime the pen. Then she dialed up the 3 units needed to make up the 45 units as ordered. LPN1 then went into the resident's room and administered the 45 units of insulin with the 2 pens. During an interview on 04/23/24 at 08:40 AM with LPN1, she confirmed that she had held the 2 pens with the needle covered horizontally and expelled the 2 units used to prime the pens. She could not confirm that she saw insulin come out of the needle. She stated that pharmacy had in-serviced the staff on the correct administration of insulin via a pen and they had demonstrated holding of the pen horizontally and not vertically.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on review of the facility policy titled Medication Storage, observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure expired medications were removed from and not stored with medications in us...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on review of the facility policy titled Medication Storage, observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure expired medications were removed from and not stored with medications in use for residents in 2 of 4 medication carts. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Medication Storage, states: 1. Medications and biological's are stored safely, securely and properly following manufacturer's recommendations or those of the supplier, The General Guidelines for Storage of Medication and Biological's, states under number 12. Outdated, contaminated, or deteriorated medications and those in containers that are cracked, soiled or without secure closures are immediately removed from stock, disposed of according to procedures for medication destruction, and reordered from the Pharmacy, if replacements are needed. An observation on 04/23/24 at 01:45 PM of the North Hall Medication Cart B revealed Famotidine 40 milligrams, 2 tabs, manufactured by Teva USA with Lot #7337102 was expired on 02/15/24. One Lispro Kwikpen manufactured by Lilly with Lot #D27056C was opened on 03/14/24 and expired on 04/11/24. One Novolog Flex Pen with Lot #NZF6H68 was opened on 03/25/24 and expired on 04/22/24. The expired medications were confirmed by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)2. An observation on 04/23/24 at 02:15 PM of the South Hall Medication Cart A revealed one pen of Toujeo with Lot #3F930A in use with no open date. LPN1 confirmed the medication did not have an open date and removed it from the medication cart.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0760 (Tag F0760)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Review of the facility policy titled Nursing Policies and Procedures Subject: Medication Management Program revision date 05/05/...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Review of the facility policy titled Nursing Policies and Procedures Subject: Medication Management Program revision date 05/05/23 revealed, Policy: The Facility implements a Medication Management program to meet the pharmaceutical needs of patients and residents, according to established standards of practice and regulatory requirements. Scope and Roles: 3. Licensed nurses will evaluate, assess, monitor, document and report the effectiveness of the medication regimen that includes all medications and supplements prescribed to treat illness, disease process, or enhance the patient's/resident's quality of life. Guidelines for Implementing an Efficient Medication Pass: 1B. The facility will ensure the schedules for administering medications: 1) Maximize the effectiveness of the medications. 2) Prevent potential for significant medication interactions .3D. Insulin daily orders, sliding scale orders, and blood glucose results are documented on the same page or screen. Preparing for the Medication Pass 8. Documentation of medications administered is completed according to State and Federal requirements. The initials and verifying signature are generally required. Administering the Medication Pass 11. Immediately after administering the medication to the resident, the authorized staff or licensed nurse will return to the medication cart and document medication administration with initials on the MAR. If a medication is not administered, the authorized staff or licensed nurse must explain why it was not given. Review of R60's Face Sheet revealed R60 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to: Acute respiratory failure, Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Diabetes mellitus due to underlying condition with diabetic neuropathy, Type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy, Major depressive disorder, Myocardial infarction, Ventricular tachycardia, Ischemic cardiomyopathy, Unspecified systolic (congestive) heart failure, and Peripheral vascular disease. Review of R60's admission MDS with an ARD of 02/19/24 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, indicating R60 was cognitively intact. Review of R60's Care Plan with a start date of 11/09/2022 and target date 05/24/24 documented, the problem: R60 .has a dx [diagnosis] of DM [diabetes mellitus] Type 2, potential for hypo [low]/hyper [high] Glycemia [glucose]. Documented goal: R60 will adhere to diet to aide in controlling glucose and HgbA1C; will not have any acute episodes of hypo/hyper glycemia episodes through. Documented approach revealed, Insulin to be administered per MD orders. Review of R60's MAR for 04/01/24 - 04/22/24 revealed an order for Lantus Solostar U-100 Insulin (insulin glargine) insulin pen; 100 unit/mL (3 mL); amt: 10 UNITS; subcutaneous Special Instructions: NOTIFY MD/NP PRN. At Bedtime 9:00 PM. The document revealed no documentation from 04/08/24 for administration at 9:00 PM, blood sugar value, route, site, or units. Review of R60's Physician Order with a start date of 02/13/24 documented, Lantus Solostar U-100 Insulin (insulin glargine) insulin pen; 100 unit/mL (3 mL); amt: 10 UNITS; subcutaneous Special Instructions: NOTIFY MD/NP PRN. At Bedtime 9:00 PM. During an interview on 04/23/24 at 11:42 AM, the DON stated that her expectations are that physician orders are followed for medication administration. She stated the process for medication administration would include reading the order, checking the order against the medication label when pulling it up or preparing the medication and then administering the medication to the resident. Documentation of the medication being administered would be expected after the resident has received the medication on the MAR. The DON revealed she expects that there would be documentation even if the medication was not given along with notification to the Medical Doctor (MD) and to the resident responsible party if medication is not given. She reported that the facility ensures accuracy of documentation on the MAR by pulling a compliance report daily and either the DON or Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) addresses identified issues. Education is provided to staff. She stated that unfortunately, they use a lot of agency nurses, which makes it challenging. The DON verified the missing documentation on the MAR for the Lantus insulin on 04/08/24. During an interview on 04/23/24 at 1:15 PM, contact information for the nurse working on 04/08/24 was requested. The DON stated that she would get the number but the nurse was from an agency and was not reliable in returning calls. During an interview on 04/23/24 at 3:21 PM, an attempted call was made to LPN4 but no answer was received and the mailbox was not set up to leave a message. Review of R5's Face Sheet revealed R5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to: Chronic kidney disease, dependence on renal dialysis, peripheral vascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heat failure, and type 2 diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy. Review of R5's MDS with an AED of 03/22/24 revealed a BIMS score of 15 out of 15, indicating R5 was cognitively intact. Review of R5's Care Plan with a start date of 08/27/20 and target date 05/17/24 documented, the problem as R5 .is at risk for potential cardiac problem r/t dx of HTN [hypertension], HLD [hyperlipidemia], Hyperkalemia [elevated potassium], CHF-stable [congestive heart failure]. Documented goal R5 .will have no alteration in cardiac output through next review. Documented approaches revealed, Meds per [by] MD [medical doctor] order, Observe for c/o [complaints of] chest congestion, cyanosis, or SOB [shortness of breath], s/s [signs and symptoms] of stroke (H/A, one sided weakness, facial drooping, etc.) and notify MD prn, V/S [vital signs] per protocol. Review of R5's MAR for 04/01/24-04/23/24 revealed no documentation from 04/22/24 at 10:00 AM or 9:00 PM for metoprolol tartrate tablet 25 mg amount to administer: ½; oral. Review of R5's Physician Order with a start date of 03/22/24 documented, an order for Furosemide tablet; 40 mg; amt: 40 mg; oral twice a day, metoprolol tartrate tablet; 25 mg; amt: ½; oral twice a day, Procardia XL (nifedipine) tablet extended release 24 hr; 30 mg; amt: 1: oral once a day. Additionally dialysis every T-Thur-Sat @ 6 AM obtain vital signs after dialysis and completed dialysis sheet once a day on Tue, Thur, Sat 11:00, dialysis every T-Thur-Sat @ 6 AM obtain vital signs after dialysis and completed dialysis sheet once a day on Tue, Thur, Sat 0500, dialysis every t-thurs-sat @ 5:30 AM heartline to transport resident. Pick-up time 0530 AM once a day on Tue, Thu, Sat 05:15, Perma cath to right chest. Monitor for s/s bleeding every shift. Notify MD/NP PRN every shift days 0700-1900, Nights 1900-0700. During an interview on 04/23/24 at 10:00 AM, R5 approached surveyor to show vital signs on the dialysis flowsheet taken at the facility prior to leaving which was 182/121 and at dialysis center 158/91. The resident reported that their blood pressure was high this morning because they did not receive blood pressure medication last night at 9:00 PM. When asked if the nurse was notified, the surveyor was informed that this had not been reported because they was in the bed. The surveyor immediately went to inform the ADON, who was on the medication cart of the reported situation and was told that they would check on it as the resident was assigned on the other cart not this one where the two were standing. The surveyor then spoke with LPN1 who had come out of a room while the surveyor was walking off the unit. LPN1 was standing at the other medication cart and was asked to check the orders for the resident. Upon review of the MAR on the computer screen it was observed that the resident had a nighttime blood pressure medication scheduled: Metoprolol Tartrate 25 mg tablet was scheduled for twice a day. On Monday, April 22, 24 at 10:00 AM and 9:00 PM, there were blanks observed on the MAR. During an interview on 04/23/24 at 11:42 AM, the DON stated expectations are that physician orders are followed. The process for medication administration would include reading the order, checking order against medication when pulling up and then administering to the resident. Documentation of the medication being administered would be expected. She expects that there would be documentation if medication was not given, that the MD be made aware along with the resident or responsible party be made aware if medication is not given. During an interview on 04/23/24 at 3:43 PM with LPN5 revealed that she came on shift at 11:00 PM and was not on duty when the 9:00 PM medication was due. She reported that the resident verbalized to her between 12:00 AM and 1:00 AM that the resident did not receive the scheduled blood pressure medication. This nurse stated she verified the order and observed that the MAR was blank and had not been signed by the previous nurse. LPN5 informed the resident that it was outside of the timeframe for it to be administered. The resident voiced a concern that there needed to be 6 hours for the medication to clear the blood stream before dialysis. This nurse reported the concern to LPN6 and stated that she was not sure what the proper next steps should have been although everyone working were agency nurses on last night. An attempted interview on 4/23/24 at 4:05 PM was made via telephone to LPN6 with no success. A review of the facility policy titled, Pharmacy Services Policies and Procedures- Medication Management, revised 04/01/2022, indicated the facility will ensure that each resident's entire drug/medication regimen is managed and monitored to promote or maintain the resident's highest practicable mental, physical, and psychosocial wellbeing. R20 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including but not limited to, schizoaffective disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, urinary tract infection, and dementia. A review of R20's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/10/24, indicated R20 is ordered to take, but is not limited to, antipsychotic and antidepressant medications. A review of R20's care plan indicated a potential for discomfort & adverse effects related to the use of antipsychotic and antidepressant medications. A review of R20's care plan and progress notes did not reveal that R20 refused medications on 04/15/24 or 04/16/24. A review of R20's physician orders indicate benztropine tablet with a start date of 07/13/23, Depakote ER tablet extended release 24 hr with a start date of 11/22/23, methenamine hippurate tablet with a start date of 12/14/23, olanzapine tablet with a start date of 03/12/24, trazodone tablet with a start date of 07/19/23, UTI-Stat liquid with a start date of 03/26/24. - blanks on 4/16/24 night shift. A review of R20's Behavior Monitoring Administration History, from 04/01/24 until 04/23/24, indicated that R20 did not receive benztropine tablet; 0.5 mg, Depakote ER (divalproex) tablet extended release 24 hr; 500 milligrams (mg), methenamine hippurate tablet; 1 gram, olanzapine tablet; 5 mg, trazodone tablet; 50 mg, UTI-Stat (cran-vitc-mannose-[NAME]-bromeln) liquid; 3,875 mg/30 mL, on 04/16/24 during the night shift. During an interview on 04/23/24 at 03:00 PM, The Director of Nursing (DON) expressed they expect nurses to document the Medication Administration Record (MAR) and Treatment Administration Record (TAR) once completing a task ordered by the physician. The DON confirmed that there were several blanks on R20's TAR and MAR for April 24, but could not give a reason why there were several blanks. Based on review of the policy, Staff Education/Orientation for administering Insulin via an Insulin Pen, record reviews, observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)90 received insulin via an insulin pen correctly. The facility further failed to ensure R60 received insulin as ordered, R5 received blood pressure medication as ordered and R20 received psychotropic and tremor medications as ordered and each resident was free from significant medication errors. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Staff Education/Orientation Policies and Procedures, the nursing, Competency: Medication Administration-Insulin Pen, states under Priming The Pen, 1. Remove the outer needle cap and dial 2 units. 2. Point the pen up and press the plunger button to expel 2 units of insulin. 3. Repeat these steps as needed until a drop or stream of insulin appears at the needle tip. NOTE: A new pen may have to be primed up to 6 times before it will expel insulin. 4. Shake the insulin off the needle top. An observation on 04/23/24 at 08:30 AM of medication administration revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)1 administering Lantus Insulin via an Insulin Pen. R90 was to receive 45 units. The insulin pen only had 42 units after the priming of the pen so the LPN opened a second Lantus Pen for the resident. The LPN took an alcohol wipe and cleaned the rubber stopper on the end of the pen, then applied the insulin needle. She dialed up the 2 units for priming the pen and did not remove the cover from the needle and held the pen horizontally and pushed the dose button to expel the 2 units used to prime the pen and then dialed up the 42 units for the dosage to be administered to the resident. The LPN then opened the new Lantus Insulin Pen and cleaned the rubber stopper on the end of the pen and applied the needle leaving the needle covered and holding the pen horizontally she pushed the dose button to expel the 2 units she had dialed up to prime the pen. Then she dialed up the 3 units needed to make up the 45 units as ordered. The LPN then went into the resident's room and administered the 45 units of insulin with the 2 pens. During an interview on 04/23/24 at 08:40 AM with LPN1, she confirmed that she had held the 2 pens with the needle covered horizontally and expelled the 2 units used to prime the pens. She could not confirm that she saw insulin come out of the needle. She stated that pharmacy had in-serviced the staff on the correct administration of insulin via a pen and they had demonstrated holding of the pen horizontally and not vertically.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on review of facility policy, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure foods stored in the refrigerator and the main kitchen preparatory area were labeled, dated, and free fro...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on review of facility policy, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure foods stored in the refrigerator and the main kitchen preparatory area were labeled, dated, and free from expiration. This failure had the potential to affect all 102 residents in the facility, who consumed food from the kitchen. Findings include: A review of the facility's policy titled, Nutrition Orientation and Competency Policy and Procedures on Food Storage with a complete revision date of 07/21/2023 stated If food is not stored properly, chances are that it will spoil quickly. Remember these pointers for storage. 1. -Follow the first in, first out (FIFO) rule. a. Always cover, label, and date leftovers that are to be stored. They should be date marked with the use-by date. 2. -Throw TCS leftovers out if not used within 3 days. On 04/21/24 at 10:27 AM, the following observations in the kitchen were made with and verified by the Dietary Manager (DM): Main refrigerator/Cooler-Two clear bags, both with 3 heads of lettuce with no open date or use-by date listed on the bag. All 6 heads of lettuce in the bags were brown with pink build-up surrounding the entire head of lettuce. Main refrigerator/Cooler-One black crate with 2 heads of lettuce with black/brown spots. No original packing, no open date or use-by date observed. Main refrigerator/Cooler-One-half of the head of lettuce, wrapped in saran wrap, with a brown/pink substance. No label was observed, and no open date or use-by date was observed. Main refrigerator/Cooler- One metal pan, approximately 6 inches deep, labeled Stewed Tom Use by date 04/20/24. On 04/21/24 at 10:39 AM observation of the main kitchen preparatory area revealed a brown cardboard box/case containing whole Idaho potatoes. 8 out of approximately 20 were rotten, containing black, grey, and green spots on potatoes. The potatoes were soft to the touch. An interview with the DM on 04/21/24 at 11:10 AM revealed I have been in this position since December 2023, about five months. DM stated, Staff is expected to check the coolers, freezers, and all other food storage areas for expired foods daily. DM stated, It's everyone's responsibility. Normally, her kitchen staff is to use the first in first out method. I am going to ensure that it is done and do another in-service on expired food. During an interview with the Director of Nursing on 04/23/24 at 3:40 PM revealed that her expectation of kitchen staff is to monitor items and dispose of items before they go bad. She stated she will talk to the kitchen staff about the monitoring and the removal of expired foods. An interview with the Administrator on 04/23/24 at 03:47 PM revealed My expectation of the kitchen is for all items to be labeled with open and use-by dates. Staff should label food as they go in and discard items that have expired to not compromise other foods.
Oct 2023 2 deficiencies 1 IJ
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on review of facility policy, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to properly supervise 1 of 1 resident to ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on review of facility policy, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to properly supervise 1 of 1 resident to prevent an elopement. Specifically, Resident (R)1 had a successful elopement from the facility on 09/22/23. On 10/03/23 at 4:55 PM, the State Agency (SA) determined that the facility's non-compliance with one or more federal health, safety, and/or quality regulations has caused or was likely to cause serious injury, serious harm, serious impairment, or death. On 10/03/23 at 4:59 PM, the Administrator was notified that the failure to properly supervise a resident, resulting in the resident successfully eloping from the facility constituted Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) at F689. On 10/03/23 at 4:59 PM, the survey team provided the Administrator with a copy of the CMS Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) Template and informed the facility IJ existed as of 09/22/23. The IJ was related to 42 CFR 483.25 - Quality of Care. On 10/04/23 at 11:59 AM, the facility provided an acceptable IJ Removal Plan. On 10/04/23, the survey team validated the facility's corrective actions and removed the IJ as of 10/04/23. The facility remained out of compliance at F689 at a lower scope and severity of D. An extended survey was conducted in conjunction with the Complaint Survey for non-compliance at F689, constituting substandard quality of care. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Elopement, with a revision date of 11/01/17 states, To safely and timely redirect patients/residents to a safe environment. A prompt investigation and search will be conducted if a patient/resident is considered missing. Document Requirements: Incident Report, Investigative Report, Nursing Notes should reflect an accurate and detailed account of situation and outcome. Social Services notes need to address emotional assessment and interventions. Missing Patient/Resident Profile and Notification Record. Review of R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed, R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including, but not limited to: vascular dementia, history of hallucinations, pain, mild anxiety and history of falling. Review of R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 09/15/23 revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 out of 15, indicating R1 was moderately cognitively impaired. Review of R1's Elopement assessment dated [DATE], indicated R1 was low risk for elopement. Review of R1's progress note dated 09/22/23 at 6:00 PM, states, Visitor noted resident exiting the front door. Resident assisted per staff back into the building without difficulty. Resident previously noted up in a wheel chair in the day room talking with other residents. Body audit completed, 15 minute checks in place. Resident redirected without difficulty, MD, RP and DON made aware. Review of the facility investigation (reportable) revealed , Resident noted exiting the front door and staff notified immediately. Two nurses and a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) went to assist resident back into the building. Resident noted to be walking towards parking area when staff arrived to him. Resident assisted into wheelchair and back into building without difficulty. Body audit completed with no skin deficits noted. Resident is alert and oriented as per usual. Fifteen minute checks initiated. Wanderguard ordered and to be placed on ankle to alert staff of any other attempts to exit the building. The resident's personal representative and the physician are made aware. During an interview on 10/03/23 at 1:05 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated, The nurse called and reported that a family member was leaving the facility and reported the resident in the parking lot just outside the front door. I think he walked out behind a visitor because you cannot open the front door without a code or you have to hold your hand on door and try to push it open for 30 seconds and then it will open. The DON stated that R1 did not have a wanderguard prior to his elopement due to the fact that an elopement assessment was completed prior to the elopement and he was found to be low risk for elopement. The DON was not present at the time of the elopement but stated that the alarm did not sound. The DON further stated that a family member that visits her family frequently saw him in the parking lot and notified us. A request was made to see the video surveillance of the parking lot for 09/22/23, but it was not provided. During an interview on 10/03/23 at 1:30 PM, the Administrator stated that she found out today that there was additional information that she was not aware of. During an interview on 10/03/23 at 2:50 PM, R8 stated that she was sitting in her room and happened to look out the window and saw a resident in the road. I thought to myself, he is going to get run over by a car. So I went up to a nurse that was talking to a family member and told them of a the resident in the road. During an interview on 10/03/23 at 3:02 PM, with the family member (FM) that found the resident in the street. The FM stated she was talking to the hospice nurse about her family members. And R8 came up to her and stated there was a resident outside in the road. The FM looked out the window and saw the resident across the street near the house at the end of the road. The FM stated she ran out there and the resident was unstable and she rested him against her knee to prevent him from falling, then a staff member yelled out to her to bring the resident back. The FM stated she yelled, No, someone bring a wheel chair. The FM further stated, there were several cars stopping to ask if assistance was needed and law enforcement came up. The FM did not know if there was a police report or not. The FM concluded that she pushed the resident back into the facility after he was in the wheel chair. During an interview on 10/03/23 at 3:58 PM, the Activity Director (AD), that is also a CNA, revealed on the day of the alleged incident she was notified by a resident that another resident was outside across the street. The AD went to the front and saw the resident, she then went and got a wheel chair and the AD along with the hospice nurse, went and got the resident and brought him back into the building. Another nurse was also at the scene. The AD stated once back in the building the resident stated that his chest hurt. The AD made sure the resident was put to bed and reported the incident to the nurses on duty. The AD further stated, that no one has spoken to her about the incident until today and no one has asked for a witness statement from her. On 10/03/23 and 10/04/23 multiple attempts were made to contact the nurses on duty and were unsuccessful. On 10/04/23 at 11:59 AM, the facility presented a Removal Plan which included the following: Resident #1 without injury and elopement risk evaluation repeated on 10/03/2023 with interventions in place per care plan. Residents in the facility had Elopement Risk Assessments repeated on 10/03/2023 with no concerns identified. Maintenance Director performed an audit on 10/03/2023 to validate facility exit alarms are functioning. No concerns identified at this time. The codes to the front entrance were changed on 10/04/2023. The double doors prior to entering the unit will be closed after 5:00 PM daily. Residents at risk of elopement have the potential to be affected. Elopement risk evaluations done in the past 90 days on current residents in the facility reviewed by nursing managers for accuracy on 10/04/2023. Residents identified a risk to be reviewed for appropriate interventions by 10/04/2023. Educate all facility staff on the expectation that if a door is noticed to be non-functioning to report to management immediately and post an employee at the door until otherwise indicated and redirected by a member of management and ensuring double doors entering the unit are to remain closed after PM. All facility staff will be reeducated on the Elopement process by 10/04/2023. All Licensed nurses will be re-educated on the elopement risk assessment process/accuracy and putting interventions in place based on the risks identified by the Director of Nursing by 10/04/2023. Any member of target audience not receiving this education by 10/4/2023 will receive prior to next scheduled shift. Facility Activity Report and 24 hour report will be reviewed Monday - Friday in clinical morning meeting to validate elopement assessments completed are accurate and interventions have been implemented accordingly. The Director of Nursing will randomly audit a minimum of 3 elopement assessments weekly for 4 weeks then monthly for 2 additional months to validate accuracy. The Maintenance Director will inspect facility doors 3 times weekly for 4 weeks then weekly for 2 additional months. The Facility Administrator will make rounds weekly for 4 weeks then monthly for 2 additional months with maintenance director to validate that doors are functioning properly. Ad hoc QAPI held on 10/03/2023. Medical Director was notified of the incident and plan for improvement on 10/03/2023. This process will be reviewed in QAPI for a minimum of 3 months. Allegation of Compliance date 10/04/2023.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Investigate Abuse (Tag F0610)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on review of facility policy, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an elopement fo...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on review of facility policy, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an elopement for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for elopement. Specifically, Resident (R)1 successfully eloped from the facility and was found down the street from the facility. Finding include: Review of the facility policy titled, Elopement with a revision date of 11/01/17, documented, Policy: . A prompt investigation and search will be conducted in a patient/resident is considered missing . Procedures: 11. Facilities Quality Assurance Committee investigates the incident and implements interventions to prevent reoccurrences. Document Requirements: Incident Report, Investigative Report, Nursing notes should reflect an accurate and detailed account of situation and outcome, Social Services notes need to address emotional assessment and interventions. Missing Patient/Resident Profile and Notification Record. Review of R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed, R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including, but not limited to: vascular dementia, history of hallucinations, pain, mild anxiety and history of falling. Review of R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 09/15/23 revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 out of 15, indicating R1 had moderately cognitively impaired. Review of R1's progress note dated 09/22/23 at 6:00 PM states, Visitor noted resident exiting the front door. Resident assisted per staff back into the building without difficulty. Resident previously noted up in a wheel chair in the day room talking with other residents. Body audit completed, 15 minute checks in place. Resident redirected without difficulty, MD, RP and DON made aware. Review of the facility reported incident revealed, Resident noted exiting the front door and staff notified immediately. Two nurses and a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) went to assist resident back into the building. Resident noted to be walking towards parking area when staff arrived to him. Resident assisted into wheelchair and back into building without difficulty. Body audit completed with no skin deficits noted. Resident is alert and oriented as per usual. Fifteen minute checks initiated. Wanderguard ordered and to be placed on ankle to alert staff of any other attempts to exit the building. The resident's personal representative and the physician are made aware. Further review revealed no employee statements and no investigation conducted by the facility. During an interview on 10/03/23 at 2:50 PM, Resident (R)8 stated that she was sitting in her room and happened to look out the window and saw a resident in the road. I thought to myself, he is going to get run over by a car. So I went up to a nurse that was talking to a family member and told them of a the resident in the road. During an interview on 10/03/23 at 3:02 PM, with the family member (FM) that found R1 in the street. FM stated she was talking to the hospice nurse about her family members. And R8 came up to her and stated there was a resident outside in the road. The FM stated she looked out the window and saw the resident across the street near the house at the end of the road. The FM ran out there and the resident was unstable and she rested him against her knee to prevent him from falling. The FM further stated a staff member yelled to her to bring the resident back and the FM yelled No, someone bring a wheel chair. The FM stated there were several cars stopping to ask if assistance was needed, and law enforcement came up. The FM stated she did not know if there was a police report or not. The FM concluded that she pushed the resident back into the facility after he was in the wheel chair. During an interview on 10/03/23 at 1:05 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated, The nurse called and reported that a family member was leaving the facility and reported the resident in the parking lot just outside the front door. I think he walked out behind a visitor because you cannot open the front door without a code or you have to hold your hand on the door and try to push it open for 30 seconds and then it will open. The DON was not present at the time of the elopement but stated that the alarm did not sound. The DON further stated that a family member that visits her family frequently saw him in the parking lot and notified us. A request was made to see the video surveillance of the parking lot on 09/22/23, but it was not provided.
Jun 2023 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on the facility policy titled, Activities of Daily Living, Optimal Function, review of medical records, and interviews, th...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on the facility policy titled, Activities of Daily Living, Optimal Function, review of medical records, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)2 received the care and services needed related to bathing for 1 of 1 residents reviewed that was dependent on staff for Activities of Daily Living. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Activities of Daily Living, Optimal Function, revealed under Policy: The facility provides care and services to ensure that a resident's abilities in activities of daily living do not diminish unless circumstances of the individuals clinical condition demonstrate that such diminution was unavoidable. The facility provides necessary care to all resident's that are unable to carry out activities of daily living on their own to ensure they maintain proper nutrition, grooming and hygiene. The facility admitted R2 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, dementia, cognitive communication deficit, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, sepsis, pain and protein calorie malnutrition. Review of R2's medical record revealed a shower schedule for Tuesdays, Thursdays and Saturdays. No documentation could be found to ensure R2 has received any showers at all. R2 was hospitalized on [DATE] and was discharged back to the facility on [DATE]. The documentation of baths revealed that R2 received a partial bath on 01/08/23. From 01/09/23 until discharge to the hospital on [DATE], there is no documentation to ensure R2 received any type of bath. There was no documentation of R2 refusing a bath during those 8 days. An interview on 01/20/23 at 01:25 PM with the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that there was no documentation to ensure R2 received a bath on any of the 8 consecutive days from 01/09/2023 until 01/16/2023 when R2 was discharged to the hospital. The DON confirmed that there was no documentation of any refusal of baths during those 8 days.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
  • "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: 2 life-threatening violation(s), Special Focus Facility, $64,075 in fines, Payment denial on record. Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 15 deficiencies on record, including 2 critical (life-threatening) violations. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
  • • $64,075 in fines. Extremely high, among the most fined facilities in South Carolina. Major compliance failures.
  • • Grade F (0/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: This facility is on CMS's Special Focus list for poor performance. Consider alternatives strongly.

About This Facility

What is Rehab Center Of Cheraw's CMS Rating?

Rehab Center of Cheraw does not currently have a CMS star rating on record.

How is Rehab Center Of Cheraw Staffed?

Staff turnover is 56%, which is 10 percentage points above the South Carolina average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs. RN turnover specifically is 59%, which is notably high. RNs provide skilled clinical oversight, so turnover in this role can affect medical care quality.

What Have Inspectors Found at Rehab Center Of Cheraw?

State health inspectors documented 15 deficiencies at Rehab Center of Cheraw during 2023 to 2025. These included: 2 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death) and 13 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.

Who Owns and Operates Rehab Center Of Cheraw?

Rehab Center of Cheraw is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by FUNDAMENTAL HEALTHCARE, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 104 certified beds and approximately 99 residents (about 95% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in Cheraw, South Carolina.

How Does Rehab Center Of Cheraw Compare to Other South Carolina Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in South Carolina, Rehab Center of Cheraw's staff turnover (56%) is significantly higher than the state average of 46%.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Rehab Center Of Cheraw?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations and the facility's high staff turnover rate.

Is Rehab Center Of Cheraw Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, Rehab Center of Cheraw has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 2 Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility is currently on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes nationwide). The facility has a 0-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in South Carolina. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.

Do Nurses at Rehab Center Of Cheraw Stick Around?

Staff turnover at Rehab Center of Cheraw is high. At 56%, the facility is 10 percentage points above the South Carolina average of 46%. Registered Nurse turnover is particularly concerning at 59%. RNs handle complex medical decisions and coordinate care — frequent RN changes can directly impact care quality. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?

Was Rehab Center Of Cheraw Ever Fined?

Rehab Center of Cheraw has been fined $64,075 across 4 penalty actions. This is above the South Carolina average of $33,720. Fines in this range indicate compliance issues significant enough for CMS to impose meaningful financial consequences. Common causes include delayed correction of deficiencies, repeat violations, or care failures affecting resident safety. Families should ask facility leadership what changes have been made since these penalties.

Is Rehab Center Of Cheraw on Any Federal Watch List?

Rehab Center of Cheraw is currently on the Special Focus Facility (SFF) watch list. This federal program identifies the roughly 1% of nursing homes nationally with the most serious and persistent quality problems. SFF facilities receive inspections roughly twice as often as typical nursing homes. Factors in this facility's record include 2 Immediate Jeopardy findings and $64,075 in federal fines. Facilities that fail to improve face escalating consequences, potentially including termination from Medicare and Medicaid. Families considering this facility should ask for documentation of recent improvements and what specific changes have been made since the designation.