Carlyle Senior Care of Fountain Inn
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Carlyle Senior Care of Fountain Inn has a Trust Grade of C, which means it is average, sitting in the middle of the pack among nursing homes. In South Carolina, it ranks #107 out of 186 facilities, placing it in the bottom half, and #12 out of 19 in Greenville County, indicating that only a few local options are better. The facility is currently worsening, as the number of reported issues increased from one in 2022 to six in 2024. Staffing is a notable weakness, with a poor rating of 1 out of 5 stars and a high turnover rate of 67%, well above the state average of 46%. While the facility has no fines on record, which is good, there have been concerning incidents such as staff failing to perform adequate hand hygiene, which could lead to infection risks, and issues with food storage and medication labeling, raising potential safety concerns for residents.
- Trust Score
- C
- In South Carolina
- #107/186
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Worse
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 67% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most South Carolina facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ○ Average
- Each resident gets 30 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for South Carolina. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
- Violations ○ Average
- 10 deficiencies on record. Average for a facility this size. Mostly minor or procedural issues.
The Good
-
4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
Below South Carolina average (2.8)
Below average - review inspection findings carefully
20pts above South Carolina avg (46%)
Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
19 points above South Carolina average of 48%
The Ugly 10 deficiencies on record
Sept 2024
6 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and facility policy the facility failed to offer/provide Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Unnecessary Medications
(Tag F0759)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on review of the facility policy, observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the medication e...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Staffing Data
(Tag F0851)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview, record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to accurately submit the Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) for Quarter Three (April 1st - June 1st), 2024 to reflect...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0868
(Tag F0868)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interview, facility policy, and federal regulation the facility failed to provide documentation that the Medical Director (MD) attended the quarterly Quality Assurance and Performance Improve...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on review of the facility policy, observation, and interviews, the facility failed to follow proper infection control practices to clean the glucometer for 1 of 1 resident (R) reviewed for gluco...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on review of the facility policy, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were free of expira...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jul 2022
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on review of facility policy, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff performed adequate hand hygiene for three of three survey days. Failure to perform adequate hand h...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jan 2021
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to adhere to Care Plan Interventions by not monitoring Side Effects and Mood/Behavior daily for psychotropic drug use for 1 ou...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, review of facility policy, and manufacturer ' s instructions, the facility failed to provide sa...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observations, staff interviews and review of facility policy, the facility failed to store, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most South Carolina facilities.
- • Grade C (55/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
- • 67% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
About This Facility
What is Carlyle Senior Care Of Fountain Inn's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns Carlyle Senior Care of Fountain Inn an overall rating of 2 out of 5 stars, which is considered below average nationally. Within South Carolina, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.
How is Carlyle Senior Care Of Fountain Inn Staffed?
CMS rates Carlyle Senior Care of Fountain Inn's staffing level at 1 out of 5 stars, which is much below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 67%, which is 20 percentage points above the South Carolina average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs. RN turnover specifically is 75%, which is notably high. RNs provide skilled clinical oversight, so turnover in this role can affect medical care quality.
What Have Inspectors Found at Carlyle Senior Care Of Fountain Inn?
State health inspectors documented 10 deficiencies at Carlyle Senior Care of Fountain Inn during 2021 to 2024. These included: 10 with potential for harm.
Who Owns and Operates Carlyle Senior Care Of Fountain Inn?
Carlyle Senior Care of Fountain Inn is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by CARLYLE SENIOR CARE, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 60 certified beds and approximately 56 residents (about 93% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in Fountain Inn, South Carolina.
How Does Carlyle Senior Care Of Fountain Inn Compare to Other South Carolina Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in South Carolina, Carlyle Senior Care of Fountain Inn's overall rating (2 stars) is below the state average of 2.8, staff turnover (67%) is significantly higher than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (3 stars) is at the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Carlyle Senior Care Of Fountain Inn?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's high staff turnover rate and the below-average staffing rating.
Is Carlyle Senior Care Of Fountain Inn Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, Carlyle Senior Care of Fountain Inn has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 2-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in South Carolina. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Carlyle Senior Care Of Fountain Inn Stick Around?
Staff turnover at Carlyle Senior Care of Fountain Inn is high. At 67%, the facility is 20 percentage points above the South Carolina average of 46%. Registered Nurse turnover is particularly concerning at 75%. RNs handle complex medical decisions and coordinate care — frequent RN changes can directly impact care quality. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?
Was Carlyle Senior Care Of Fountain Inn Ever Fined?
Carlyle Senior Care of Fountain Inn has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Carlyle Senior Care Of Fountain Inn on Any Federal Watch List?
Carlyle Senior Care of Fountain Inn is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.