Brookview Healthcare Center

510 Thompson Street, Gaffney, SC 29340 (864) 489-3101
For profit - Limited Liability company 132 Beds Independent Data: November 2025 4 Immediate Jeopardy citations
Trust Grade
0/100
#144 of 186 in SC
Last Inspection: August 2024

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Brookview Healthcare Center in Gaffney, South Carolina, received a Trust Grade of F, indicating poor conditions and significant concerns. It ranks #144 out of 186 facilities in the state, placing it in the bottom half of South Carolina nursing homes, and is the least favorable option in Cherokee County. The facility's trend is stable, with four issues reported consistently over the last two years. Staffing is a concern, with a rating of 2 out of 5 stars and a turnover rate of 53%, which is average but still raises questions about staff consistency. Additionally, the center has incurred $42,172 in fines, which is higher than 81% of facilities in the state, signaling potential compliance issues. RN coverage is also lacking, as it is lower than 84% of state facilities, which can impact the quality of care. Specific incidents include a failure to prevent a resident from eloping, which posed a significant safety risk, and a serious case of sexual abuse where one resident inappropriately touched another, observed by staff. While the facility has made efforts to address these issues, families should weigh these significant concerns against any strengths when considering care for their loved ones.

Trust Score
F
0/100
In South Carolina
#144/186
Bottom 23%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Holding Steady
4 → 4 violations
Staff Stability
⚠ Watch
53% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
Penalties
✓ Good
$42,172 in fines. Lower than most South Carolina facilities. Relatively clean record.
Skilled Nurses
⚠ Watch
Each resident gets only 18 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for South Carolina. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
Violations
○ Average
9 deficiencies on record. Average for a facility this size. Mostly minor or procedural issues.
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Overall Rating
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Staff Levels
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Care Quality
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2024: 4 issues
2025: 4 issues

The Good

  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in fire safety.

The Bad

1-Star Overall Rating

Below South Carolina average (2.8)

Significant quality concerns identified by CMS

Staff Turnover: 53%

Near South Carolina avg (46%)

Higher turnover may affect care consistency

Federal Fines: $42,172

Above median ($33,413)

Moderate penalties - review what triggered them

The Ugly 9 deficiencies on record

4 life-threatening
Sept 2025 1 deficiency 1 IJ
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on review of facility policy, record review, interview and observation, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)4 was pr...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on review of facility policy, record review, interview and observation, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)4 was provided appropriate supervision to prevent an elopement from the facility for 1 of 3 resident reviewed.On 09/05/25 at 11:21 AM, the surveyor provided the Administrator with a copy of the CMS Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) Template, informing the facility IJ existed as of 09/03/25. The IJ was related to 42 CFR 483.25 - Freedom from Accidents Hazards/Supervision/Devices.On 09/05/25, the facility provided an acceptable IJ Removal Plan. On 09/05/25, the survey team validated the facility's corrective actions and determined the facility put forth due diligence in addressing the non-compliance. The SA is considering this IJ at Past Non-compliance as of 09/04/25.An Extended Survey was conducted in conjunction with the Complaint Survey for noncompliance at F689, constituting substandard quality of care.Review of the facility policy titled Elopement Response Guidelines with an effective date 05/01/06 states, It is the responsibility of all staff to provide a safe environment for all residents. The following guidelines will be followed in the event that a resident is missing. Responding to an actual elopement: 1. It is the responsibility of all staff, regardless of the department they work in, to respond to activated door alarms and to return residents to their unit . 3. When a resident is determined to be missing: Note the time that the resident is/was determined missing. The staff members assigned to the unit where the resident resides will verify that the resident has not been signed out. Staff members will do a thorough search to locate the resident. If the resident is not located, proceed with the following: The Charge Nurse will notify the Director of Nursing that a resident is missing. Staff members from other departments will search the entire facility and grounds. Prior to beginning the search, the resident's photograph will be viewed by all staff involved in the search.Review of R4's Face Sheet revealed R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to other seizures (History of), vascular dementia, moderate, with anxiety (History of), and dementia.Review of R4's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 09/05/25 revealed the assessment is in process.Review of R4's Care Plan with a start date of 08/30/25 revealed, Resident has disorganized thinking or incoherent (rambling or irrelecant conversation, unclear or illogical flow of ideas, or unpredictable switching from subject to subject) R/T [related to] dementia diagnosis. This Care Plan directed staff to, Orient to person, place, and time as appropiate [sic]. Protect from injuring self and others during delirious state. provide a quiet, well-lit, calm environment. Surround resident with familiar objects. Remove potentially dangerous objects from environment. Further review of the Care Plan dated 08/30/25 revealed, Resident has socially inappropriate/disruptive behavioral symptoms as evidenced by: verbal and physical threats to staff. This Care Plan directed staff to, Avoid over-stimulation (e.g., noise, crowding, other physically aggressive residents). Maintain a calm environment and approach to the resident.Review of a document titled Addressing Decisional Capacity, signed by the Attending Physician on 09/02/25 revealed, This patient DOES NOT meet all the criteria for decisional capacity, therefor is not able to make healthcare decisions for self . Further review of this document revealed, Criteria not met: Oriented to person place time, Understands the nature of his/her illness, Ability to understand that decisions need to be made, Ability to communicate a decision, Ability to under and use information logically to reach a decision, Ability to be realistic in decision making .Review of R4's Progress Notes, revealed the following notes:08/30/25 at 10:30 AM Resident arrived via stretcher . Resident exit seeking.08/30/25 at 7:07 PM Resident continues to exit seek.08/31/25 at 11:02 AM Resident up this am ambulating . Continues to exit seek pushing on doors.09/01/25 at 2:00 PM Resident continues to exit seek.09/01/25 at 5:57 PM . Noted exit seeking and has made door alarm go off in dining room and long peach hall door .09/01/25 at 6:24 PM Resident attempting to leave this nurse was trying to redirect resident.09/03/25 at 9:00 PM Recorded as late entry on 09/04/25 at 1:59 PM During Shift change this nurse and day shift nurse was counting NARCS. 7P-7a CNA asked where [R4], her resident was. Another CNA spoke up and said she is on Peach unit sitting on the couch. The 7P- 7a CNA went to Peach. Resident was not there. All staff from all units began looking tor [sic] [R4] around 7:15-7:17pm. As the staff was outside looking for the resident [R4]. The kitchen lady pulled up with [R4]. she reported she had seen her at [local grocery store]. She was able to bring her back to the facility in her car .During an interview on 09/04/25 at 2:45 PM, Dietary 1 stated, I have worked here for three years now. I clocked out at 7:20 PM yesterday. I called my daughter to pick me up from work. I told her to bring my wallet with her so I could go to [local grocery store]. As soon as we pulled up at [local grocery store, I saw [R4] standing in front of [local grocery store] holding a bag of chicken. She was standing partially in the road. It was a good thing she didn't get hit by a car. She told me she was there because she had to go pick up her kids. I returned her to the facility. When we arrived, [Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN1)] came out to get her with the other staff.During an interview on 09/04/25 at 2:54 PM, LPN2 stated, I was coming on to my shift. I work 7P to 7A, the nurse before me left early. I counted the narcotics with the other nurse, and as we were counting, I heard the [Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)1] asking where is my resident. The other CNA said she is on Peach, sitting on the couch. Then she ask again where is my resident. We continued to finish counting the Narcotics. Then we proceed to look for [R4]. We first looked in the building, we didn't see her. When went outside to look for her, we saw the kitchen lady bringing her back to the facility. The kitchen lady told us [R4] was at [local grocery store]. The [local grocery store] is 1.3 miles from [the facility]. [R4] had a little bag of chicken. I wasn't sure if she was given the chicken or if the kitchen lady gave her the chicken. We had a time getting her back in the building. The CNAs are supposed to walk around with each other and get report. Some of the younger CNAs do not round on the residents with the off going CNAs. It is a requirement here at this facility to do rounds at the end of the shift. [R4] is not oriented. She is oriented to self. When she gets out the door all of her orientation seems to come back. We asked her how she got out of the building and she said she went out with a group of Black people. We immediately placed her on 15-minute checks. She then darted to the side door on Dogwood. Those doors, if you lean on them, the door will open up. She sat in the chair and cussed at us. I proceeded to give her medications, then she calmed down. The DON came in to get our statements.During an interview on 09/04/25 at 3:21 PM, Registered Nurse (RN)1 stated, I was called around 7:20 PM by [LPN1] who stated, The resident got out of the building, and they were looking for the resident. They said they were looking for her for about 10 minutes. That is when the lady from the kitchen pulled up and told us she found her at the [local grocery store]. I asked her if she had any injuries and to do a full body audit. Then I called the Administrator. The resident was placed on 15-minute checks. The staff was educated on abuse/neglect and elopement. We are still educating the staff. They called the SC House Calls our on-call group. Staff did not report any issues with the door. She left out of the Dogwood main entrance door. Unsure how she got out of the door. We are still investigating.During an observation on 09/04/25 at 3:33 PM, the surveyor looked at the front door to the Dogwood unit. This surveyor observed a coded keypad on the door. The entry was a double-door exit to get outside. If you hold the lever on the door for 15 seconds, after the countdown down the door opens. A sign on the door states push until alarm sounds door will open in 15 seconds. The audio alarm which was a beeping noise was minimal. The alert sound was not loud.During an interview on 09/04/25 at 3:35 PM, R4 stated, It is so many doors here I am unsure which door I went out of. I got out good and came back good. I should have gone home. I went to get me something to eat. When I came back they told me to go back to my room, and they were going to get someone to come get me, but no one answered. I am here at the hospital. I have never been in this place. R4 continued to tell this surveyor she is going to get her medicine.During an interview on 09/04/24 at 4:04 PM, CNA1 stated, I look for my people when I come on shift. I pulled up in the parking lot at 6:40 PM. I clocked in at 6:44 PM. I looked at a few rooms and I realized [R4] wasn't in the room. I asked where she was and they said she was on Peach. I walked the long way around through the Dogwood unit. I went back to the desk and asked where is [R4]. She is not in the cafeteria. This is when we found out she wasn't in the building. It was about 7:00 PM or 7:05 PM. That is when I told them she wasn't in the building. We looked in every room, in all of the showers and outside. While we were looking for her, one of the ladies in the kitchen was at [local grocery store] and they brought her back to the facility. She was fighting to come back in the building, but she came back in with me. She was still shaking the doors and trying to get out of the building all night. After she returned, I did 15-minute checks all night. [CNA2] was the CNA who had her for first shift. She told me she was on Peach. That wasn't the first time she tried to get out of the building. She had been admitted for at least 5 to 6 days. Our doors tell you when you can exit after attempting to go out. If you hold it for 15 seconds, they will open. The doors also speaks out loud to tell you when to exit. I was very upset that I couldn't find my resident. She told us she followed a group of Black people out. She was in her street clothes. She doesn't look like a resident unless you know her. She is constantly getting out of the door. She has gotten out before and made it to the parking lot. They don't do a walk-through for the report because a lot of CNAs are pulling double shifts. Shift report consist of the CNAs telling you at the desk that this person is doing this or that. Some of the CNAs don't tell you anything. I've been here for at least a year. The end of shift report was not explained to us in detail in orientation. She is not the only resident who gets out. The re-education I have received was on the elopement process.During an interview on 09/04/25 at 4:41 PM, CNA2 stated, I got a phone call about the last time I saw [R4]. It was around 6:15 PM and 6:30 PM. She had been exit seeking all day. We told her she can't go out, and she cussed us out. I redirected her to the dining area at Peach. She went to the dining hall. She was sitting in a Geri chair. The CNA that came in at 7:00 PM asked me had I seen [R4]. I told her where I last saw her. We walked together looking for her. We called the MD [Medical Director] around 7ish. We went outside looking, and that is when we saw one of our kitchen staff pull up outside with her in the car with a bag of chicken. We assumed she followed someone out of the door. I know she has dementia. She told us I let myself out. I am unsure if she seen the code because we didn't hear any alarms. This incident happened at shift change, so you would think someone would have seen her in the parking lot. She is a very smart lady. The doors have a sign on it that states to hold for 15 seconds, then it will open. We received her from the parking lot and assisted her up the hill. She was fussing at us. She sat in a chair by the door when she returned. She was insisting she needed to go pick up her children. Once she calmed down we slide her away from the door. We notified the DON. [Local grocery store] is about 1.3 miles from here. Today, when I returned I was re-educated on abuse/neglect and elopement. The DON went over the steps of elopement.During an interview on 09/04/25 at 4:54 PM, the Administrator stated, The DON called me to let me know what happened. I came to the facility to do the reportable. We had the resident on 15-minute checks. We did a body audit. There were no injuries. The DON received statements to get a timeline to start the reportable. The Abuse/Neglect in-service was started and she is continuing exit seek today. We have the alarms on scheduled checks. We had someone come out and access all of the doors. The signs are on the door, but I don't think we can take the signs off the door for regulations concerns. I know a dementia resident can read the door. She is on the 15-minute checks currently. The family has not been here to see her yet. The family lives in Rock Hill and [NAME]. I think she was exit seeking because she is not from here. The family is looking to move her closer to home. We have cameras in the parking lot. The only thing we can see on the camera is she exited out of the front door of the Dogwood unit. She walked in the parking lot and around the circle. After that we did not see anything else.During an interview on 09/04/25 at 5:07 PM, the Maintenance Director stated, The video is only outside. We can't see what she did to exit. We don't have many residents who exit a lot. The staff are able to redirect if the resident attempts to open the door to exit. I checked that door and the other doors to check functionality. I pushed on the door to make sure the alarm would go off. We checked the doors weekly. Amplified Electronic is the last company we had check the doors last month. The only door that was loose was the door by the kitchen near the vending machines. I tighten the door. During an interview on 09/05/25 at 12:13 PM, LPN3 stated, The facility does not utilize the Wandergurad system, but there are alarms on the door that will go off when opened. If the handle is held down for about 10 seconds, the door will open. LPN3 finally stated that the alarms are not always able to be heard from a resident's room, but can be heard if you are in the hallway. On 09/05/25, the facility provided an acceptable IJ Removal Plan, which included the following:The immediate action taken for the deficient practice include the following:A body audit was completed on Resident #4 upon return to the facility. No injuries were noted.Resident was immediately placed on 15 minute checks.Staff in service on elopement prevention and CMS guidelines were conducted beginning 09/03/2025 and completed on 09/04/2025.Head count conducted for the entire facility following the elopement. All residents accounted for.Maintenance director checked all doors throughout the building. All doors were noted to be functioning properly.The facility recognizes that all residents have the potential to be affected by this deficient practice. Measures put into place to ensure this deficient practice does not reoccur includes the following:A professional contractor was contacted on 09/04/2025 to complete a facility-wide inspection of all door alarms and perform any necessary corrective work. Scheduled to be completed on 09/09/2025.As part of this inspection, the contractor will also evaluate and adjust alarm volume upward, as needed, to ensure maximum audibility throughout the facility.Elopement risk assessments completed on admission, quarterly and with significant changes.Elopement drill conducted on 09/05/2025.All new hires receive dementia management training. The nursing department receives further education on dementia/wandering residents annually and as needed throughout the year.Monitors to be put in place to ensure the deficient practice does not reoccur include:Door alarm inspections will be increased to daily from weekly by the maintenance staff.Inservice to be provided to staff regarding any issues with the doors/alarms must be reported directly to the Director of Nursing or the Administrator.The facility has set the TELS system, used to document completion of the monitoring, to alert the administrator via email and mobile application that the task was completed.The administrator will take findings to QAPI committee monthly for three months and quarterly thereafter until the issue is deemed to require no further issue.The facility alleges that we were in compliance on 09/04/2025.
Feb 2025 2 deficiencies 1 IJ
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on review of the facility policy, record review, and interview, the facility failed to protect 1 of 1 resident from sexual...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on review of the facility policy, record review, and interview, the facility failed to protect 1 of 1 resident from sexual abuse. Specifically, Resident (R)2 wandered into R1's room and inappropriately touched R1, this was observed by two staff members. Based on the Reasonable Person Approach, R1 had the potential to suffer severe psychosocial harm. On 02/27/25 at 6:21 PM, the State Agency (SA) determined that the facility's non-compliance with one or more federal health, safety, and/or quality regulations has caused or was likely to cause serious injury, serious harm, serious impairment, or death. On 02/27/25 at 6:21 PM, the Administrator and the Director of Nursing were notified that the failure to protect a resident from sexual abuse constituted Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) at F600. On 02/27/25 at 6:21 PM, the survey team provided the Administrator with a copy of the CMS Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) Template and informed the facility IJ existed as of 02/04/25. The IJ was related to 42 CFR 483.12 - Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation. On 02/28/25 at 1:25 PM, the facility provided an acceptable IJ Removal Plan. On 02/28/25 at 2:16 PM, the survey team validated the facility's corrective actions and removed the IJ. The facility remained out of compliance at F600 at a lower scope and severity of D. An extended survey was conducted due to non-compliance at F600, constituting substandard quality of care. Findings include: Review of the undated facility policy titled Abuse and Neglect Prohibition, documented, .each resident has the right to be free from mistreatment, neglect, abuse, involuntary seclusion, and misappropriation of property . Sexual Abuse - Includes, but is not limited to sexual harassment, sexual coercion, sexual assault . Prevention 2.) Facility supervisors will immediately correct and intervene in reported or identified situations in which abuse, neglect or misappropriation of resident property is at risk for occurring. Review of R1's Face Sheet revealed R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including, but not limited to: schizoaffective disorder, dementia, with other behavioral disturbance, epilepsy, and anxiety. Review of R1's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/29/24, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 4 out of 15, indicating R1 had severe cognitive impairment. Review of R2's Face Sheet revealed R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including, but not limited to: restlessness and agitation, psychotic disorder with hallucinations due to known physiological condition, Schizoaffective disorder, and Parkinsonism. Review of R2's Quarterly MDS with ARD of 01/17/25, revealed a BIMS score of 10 out of 15, indicating R2 had moderate cognitive impairment. Review of R2's Quarterly Elopement Evaluation dated 01/13/25 at 9:05 AM, documented R2 is ambulatory and/or Independent in wheelchair locomotion. R2 is cognitively impaired, has poor decision-making skills, and/or pertinent diagnosis. R2 has a history of wandering. Resident is at risk for elopement. Review of R2's Progress Note dated 02/04/25 at 1:07 AM, documented, Resident noted being physically aggressive with staff and other residents. Resident noted going into resident's room, pulling off the covers from resident, and screaming at different resident. Resident became physically and verbally combative with staff with staff was attempting to redirect resident. DON notified. EMS called for transport to ER for psych eval. Nursing Review of R1's Progress Note dated 02/05/25 at 11:23 AM, documented, LOA: Per daughter's (RP) request, res transported to CMC ER for exam. Res awake and alert. No s/sx of pain or distress noted. Nursing During a phone interview with R1's Representative (RP) on 02/27/25 at 10:28 AM, revealed that on 02/05/25, between 10:30 AM and 11:00 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) contacted R1's RP via phone and said on Monday night 02/03/24, going into 02/04/25, a male resident went missing and staff couldn't find him. When facility staff started looking for him, they heard water running from R1's room, and staff went in the room, and found the male resident. R2 was completely naked, and was actively trying to get R1's brief off. The facility staff intervened and removed him from her room. R1's RP stated the DON told her staff assessed the female resident that night, and the next morning, and she didn't have any trauma related to the event. R1's RP stated R1 has severe dementia, and will say yes as her only form of communication, and is non-ambulatory. Staff told her (R1's RP) they didn't think that it was a big enough deal and since they didn't find anything, it was not a reportable offense. The DON told the RP the male resident was sent to the psych ward. R1's RP stated, It killed me when I got the call, I requested them to send my mom to the hospital, because their assessments were not thorough enough in my opinion. R1's RP further stated that R1 went out to the hospital, no abrasions to the body or vaginal area. Police told her that R2 was interviewed and admitted to the police that R2 put it in but not all the way, not enough to make babies. I called the ombudsman, and she gave me the department's information to file a complaint. During an interview with the Attorney General Council for the [Local Hospital] Healthcare System via phone on 02/27/25 at 1:55 PM, revealed that the internet is down and they would not be able to send the hospital information until the internet is available. However, the Attorney General Council revealed R1's HPI (history of present illness) revealed given concerns of potential sexual consult. Review of R1's HPI dated 02/05/25, documented, [R1] is a 77 y.o. a female who presents to the emergency department today given concerns over a potential sexual assault. History somewhat limited as patient does have a history of dementia, I am told by EMS that her care facility reported to the family that another individual with dementia may have exposed himself and had been on top her two days ago, the family had requested that she be transferred to the emergency department for further assessment. She does not have any acute complaints I am told she is mentating at baseline and does again have a known history of dementia, she will intermittently participate in the history and physical exam, and has not had any recent falls or other difficulties. ED Course Notes: SANE (Sexual Assault Nursing Examiners) has completed their evaluation, and was also able to discuss with the daughter. It sounds that the perpetrator of this event is actually not demented, but rather is a known schizophrenic. As a result SANE will contact the police department and has filed appropriate reports, we will continue to maintain patient safety until disposition can be made and we will discuss with the nursing facility prior to any plans to discharge home it sounds that this individual is also not currently at the facility so she would have a safe place to go. Police have evaluated the situation and appropriate reports filed per SANE team, patient safe to return to her care facility. Spoke with nurse at Brookview. She states the report she was given is that the event occurred at 2 am Tuesday morning. The male dementia patient at Brookview was lost for about 10 minutes. The male patient was found fully naked on top of [R1]. [R1] was also naked other than a diaper when found. Nurse states [R1's] diaper was pulled to the side and male was attempting to take it off. Nurse states unsure if there was penetration. Bed Confined-Unable to ambulate, unable to get out of bed without assistance, unable to safely sit up in a wheelchair. Review of R2's HPI dated 02/04/25, documented, PT to ED via EMS from Brookview. Facility states pt had Aggressive behaviors. Pt is pleasant in triage. [R2] is a 56 y.o male sent from Brookview with aggressive behavior. According to EMS, the patient was being aggressive towards other occupants at the facility. Patients denies this and state he just want to smoke. Unable to perform ROS (Review of Symptoms), Psychiatric disorder. Additional MDM and Provider Notes: [AGE] year-old male brought in by EMS from Brookstone for reported aggressive behavior towards other occupants of the facility. Patient has no knowledge of this and has very tangential thoughts. He has no complaints. CBC showed no leukocytosis, mild anemia. CMP shows reassuring electrolytes, normal renal function and liver function. UDS negative. Ethanol undetectable. Urinalysis not suggestive of a urinary tract infection. Awaiting telepsychiatrist recommendations. Patient signed out to the day team. Spoke with case management regarding the patient no longer being accepted at BrookView due to sexual assault against another [NAME] of BrookView. Case management will look at the patient for placement, however, the patient will not be able to have placement at a facility with pending charges. Dr.notified. Review of an Employee Statement Form written by Certified Nursing Aide (CNA)1 dated 02/04/25 at 1:00 AM stated, On 2/4/2025 at 1AM, I noticed [R2] was missing from the nurse's desk for a few minutes. I got up, I went to his room and he was not in his room. I went to Dogwood, I asked the staff if they had seen [R2], and they stated they heard him playing the piano in the dining room. [Registered Nurse (RN)2] got up, we went to the courtyard, and he was not in the courtyard. We went to the dining room, he was not in the dining room. We looked outside of the dining room, called his name, and he was not outside of the dining room. We came down the hall, I told [Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)1] that i could not find [R2]. I went into 150 thinking he may have gone in there to look for a radio. I heard [RN2] say he was in 157. I walked back up the hall into 157, I saw [R2] putting on his shirt, and [LPN1] walked in at that time. [RN1] told [LPN1] about what was happening. I walked with [R2] back to the nurse's desk on the peach and waited on EMS to come and get him. Review of the Employee Statement Form written by LPN1 on 02/04/25 at 1:00 AM, documented, On 2/4/25 at around 1 AM, [R2] was sitting at the nurse's desk on the couch. [R2] got up and walked down the hall. [CNA1] asked if [R2] was still sitting on the couch. This nurse said no, he walked down the hall. [CNA1] went to find the resident. [CNA1] walked over on the Dogwood unit and asked the Dogwood staff if the resident had walked by, and Dogwood staff said not recently. Dogwood staff went with [CNA1] to help locate the resident. [CNA1] came back to Peach nursing desk and informed this nurse and another cna that [R2] was not located in the initial search. This nurse and [CNA2] went to Peach Short Hall, looking in rooms, the kitchen, and the laundry room. While walking back to the peach unit, this nurse heard [RN2] talking while coming on to peach unit via long hall. Staff was noted in room [ROOM NUMBER]. Particularly 157A in [R1's] room. This nurse noted [R2] standing beside of 157A'a bed with no pants on. [R2] was yelling at staff and being aggressive. [RN1] explained she saw [R2] on top of [R1] when she entered the room then [R2] got up and got dressed. This nurse took [R2] to the nurses desk. This nurse notified the DON and called EMS to transport resident to the hospital. [CNA] stayed with [R2] while this nurse went back to 157A's room to assess [R1]. [R1] was laying in bed on back. Upon inspection, resident noted to have brief intact, still adhered to both sides. The brief was pulled up the front, with the brief creating a thong like appearance, within the labia majoria. This nurse removed the brief. No redness, injuries, or bruising noted to the vulva or vagina area. Resident denied pain to that area. EMS arrived and escorted [R2] to ER. During an interview, via phone, with LPN1 on 02/27/25 at 2:24 PM, LPN1 confirmed her statement. LPN1 stated she is familiar with both residents. LPN1 stated she spoke to the DON, she and another nurse, and since her brief was intact, they didn't believe she was penetrated, or sexually assaulted which is why she was not sent to the hospital. LPN1 stated she spoke to the DON first, and informed she would take care of it all the following morning. LPN1 stated she did not notify R1's family. LPN1 stated the assessments were visual. No documentation was filled out. Typically it should have been done on paper, and filled out to its entirety. Review of an undated Employee Statement Form written by RN1, states, I was sitting at Dogwood desk working when [CNA1] from peach asked if I saw [R2]. I told her not in the last little bit, but I heard him playing the piano about 15 minutes ago. I went to help [CNA] look for the resident. After looking on Dogwood and in the dining room, the cna went to see if the other staff had seen the resident. Upon walking onto Peach Unit, I heard water running in 157 and knew neither resident could turn it on. When I opened the door the water in the sink was on and about to over flow. I then saw [R2] naked on top of [R1] 157A. I told him to get off of her right now. [R1] was laying flat in bed with cover pulled off, Gown pulled up and brief slightly pulled to the side. At this time, other staff was in the room. This nurse asked [R1] if she was okay and she just looked at me and finally said yes. [LPN1] took [R2] out of the room to the desk. [LPN1] then called DON and EMS. Attempt to interview, via phone, CNA1 on 02/27/25 at 1:05 PM, was unsuccessful and unable to leave a voicemail. Attempt to interview, via phone, RN1 on 02/27/25 at 3:19 PM, was unsuccessful. During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 02/27/25 at 12:19 PM, the DON she is aware of a situation between two residents, R1 and R2. LPN1 called her on 02/04/25 at 1 AM stating R2 walked out of [LPN] and [CNA's] sight and they got up and started looking for him down the hall. They walked around the building to ensure he didn't make it out of the building. Dogwood nurse, located him in R1's room, completely naked, on top of female resident. Female residents covers were pushed back, brief still on. The DON stated LPN1 yelled at him to get off her, and yelled for back up, and another nurse came in to assist the RN. LPN1 told me she assessed the resident. There was no evidence that he penetrated her. No redness, no discharge, no bruises. Female resident has dementia, and is not cognitive enough to say what would have happened to her. Male resident has psychosis issues, he had behavioral issues, however, not sexual, physical and verbal. The DON stated she hadn't had any issues with R2. The DON stated it was her decision to not send R1 to the hospital because R1 did not have redness, or injury. The DON stated her fear was that if R2 tried to do it and wasn't successful, he would try that with somebody else and didn't want him back at the facility. The DON stated R1's niece, who is a nurse in the facility and works on that unit messaged her on the following night, it was on 02/04/24, and she found out upon getting the report. She asked me if R1's daughter had been notified, and the nurse confirmed she hadn't called. The DON stated she would notify her the following day on 02/05/25. The DON further stated on 02/05/25, she called the daughter and apologized in regards to her not being notified the day it happened. The DON told the daughter, R2 walked in R1's room, had gotten in bed with R1, and her brief was still on. The DON stated R1's daughter requested R1 to be sent out. The DON stated she told the daughter that she was assessed twice by facility staff and there were no injuries and that the male resident was sent out that night. The daughter still wanted her mother to get sent out. During an interview with the Administrator on 02/27/25 at 3:40 PM, revealed she is familiar with both residents. The Administrator stated the DON told her that R2 went into R1 room. R2 wandered off from LPN1's sight and ended up in R1's room. R2 was found naked, at R1's bedside. The Administrator stated he was removed from the room. R2 was sent out to the hospital for further evaluation. R1 did not go, there was no indication it occurred. She was fine. She didn't remember anything having happened. On 02/28/25 at 1:25 PM, the facility provided an acceptable IJ Removal Plan, which included the following: - Resident #2 was sent to the Hospital Psychiatric Unit. - Resident #1 was checked for any signs and symptoms of abuse. She was sent to hospital for further evaluation. - Resident #1 did not recall the incident occurring. - All staff will receive additional training on Sexual Abuse by the Staff Development Coordinator starting 2/28/25 and will be completed by March 3, 2025. - The DON was provided with additional training on reportable incidents by the Administrator on 02/27/25. - The Administrator will be notified in addition to the Director of Nursing of all unusual occurrences involving two residents. - All staff will be educated to the update of this procedure by the Staff Development starting 02/28/25 and will be completed by March 3, 2025. - All incident reports will be brought to the Morning Meeting for review. - The Administrator will monitor these incidents to ensure that any resident/resident incidents were reported to her. Administrator will take findings of this monitoring tool to the QAPI committee monthly for three months and quarterly thereafter until the issue is deemed to require no further review. The facility alleges that we were in compliance on 02/28/25.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on review of the facility policy, record review, and interview, the facility failed to report to the State Survey Agency (...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on review of the facility policy, record review, and interview, the facility failed to report to the State Survey Agency (SSA) an alleged incident involving sexual abuse, that occurred on 02/04/25. Findings include: Review of the undated facility policy titled Abuse and Neglect Prohibition, documented, Prevention 2.) Facility supervisors will immediately correct and intervene in reported or identified situations in which abuse, neglect or misappropriation of resident property is at risk for occurring. The facility will report allegations and substantiated occurrences of abuse, neglect and misappropriation of resident property to the state agency and law enforcement officials designated by state law. The facility will report to the company management and legal departments in accordance with company reporting procedures. The facility will report any occurrences of abuse by registered or certified staff to the State Board as required by state law. Policies and facility procedure will be analyzed and modified as necessary by the QA&A Committee so as to meet the full intent of the law. Review of R1's HPI (History of Present Illness) dated 02/05/25, documented, [R1] is a 77 y.o. a female who presents to the emergency department today given concerns over a potential sexual assault. History somewhat limited as patient does have a history of dementia, I am told by EMS that her care facility reported to the family that another individual with dementia may have exposed himself and had been on top her two days ago, the family had requested that she be transferred to the emergency department for further assessment . Review of R2's HPI dated 02/04/25, documented, PT to ED via EMS from Brookview. Facility states pt had Aggressive behaviors. Spoke with case management regarding the patient no longer being accepted at BrookView due to sexual assault against another [NAME] of BrookView. Review of the Employee Statement Form written by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)1 on 02/04/25 at 1:00 AM, documented, On 2/4/25 at around 1 AM, . Staff was noted in room [ROOM NUMBER]. Particularly 157A in [R1's] room. This nurse noted [R2] standing beside of 157A'a bed with no pants on. [Registered Nurse (RN)1] explained she saw [R2] on top of [R1] when she entered the room then [R2] got up and got dressed. This nurse notified the DON and called EMS to transport resident to the hospital. [R1] was laying in bed on back. Upon inspection, resident noted to have brief intact, still adhered to both sides. The brief was pulled up the front, with the brief creating a thong like appearance, within the labia majoria. This nurse removed the brief. No redness, injuries, or bruising noted to the vulva or vagina area. Resident denied pain to that area. EMS arrived and escorted [R2] to ER. Review of an undated Employee Statement Form written by RN1, documented, Upon walking onto Peach Unit, I heard water running in 157 and knew neither resident could turn it on. When I opened the door the water in the sink was on and about to over flow. I then saw [R2] naked on top of [R1]. I told him to get off of her right now. [R1] was laying flat in bed with cover pulled off, gown pulled up and brief slightly pulled to the side. [LPN1] then called the DON and EMS. During a phone interview with the Ombudsman on 02/27/25 at 10:34 AM, revealed she is aware of the complaint involving Resident R1 and R2. The Ombudsman stated that R1's daughter had contacted her to make a complaint and told her that the police were investigating the complaint. The Ombudsman stated she could not recall the exact date; however, it was February 2025. The Ombudsman stated she came to the facility on [DATE], and no one at the facility reported anything to her regarding the incident that occurred between R1 and R2. The Ombudsman also stated she gave R1's daughter the department's information to submit an online submission. During a phone interview with R1's Representative (RP) on 02/27/25 at 10:28 AM, revealed that on 02/05/25, between 10:30 AM and 11:00 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) contacted R1's RP via phone and said on Monday night 02/03/24, going into 02/04/25, R2 was completely naked, and was actively trying to get R1's brief off. The facility staff intervened and removed him from her room. Staff told her (R1's RP) they didn't think that it was a big enough deal and since they didn't find anything, it was not a reportable offense. During an interview, via phone, with LPN1 on 02/27/25 at 2:24 PM, LPN1 confirmed her statement. LPN1 stated she spoke to the DON, she and another nurse, and since her brief was intact, they didn't believe she was penetrated, or sexually assaulted which is why she was not sent to the hospital. LPN1 stated she spoke to the DON first, and informed she would take care of it all the following morning. LPN1 stated she did not notify R1's family. During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 02/27/25 at 12:19 PM, the DON stated she is aware of a situation between two residents, R1 and R2. LPN1 called her on 02/04/25 at 1:00 AM, stating RN1 located R2 in R1's room, completely naked, on top of the female resident. The female residents covers were pushed back, brief still on. There was no evidence that he penetrated her, no redness, no discharge, no bruises. The DON stated on 02/05/25, she called the daughter and apologized in regards to her not being notified the day it happened. During an interview with the Administrator on 02/27/25 at 3:40 PM, the Administrator stated the DON told her that R2 went into R1 rooms, R2 was found naked, at R1's bedside. The Administrator stated the DON is responsible for reporting, and this incident should have been reported, and is unsure as to why the DON did not.
Jan 2025 1 deficiency 1 IJ
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on review of the facility policy, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide appropriate supervision to...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on review of the facility policy, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide appropriate supervision to prevent Resident (R)1's elopement from the facility. Resident (R)1 had a successful elopement from the facility on 01/25/2025 and was without supervision for a period of time. R1 was last seen ambulating in the hall around 6:00 PM by a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA). Approximately around 7:00 PM, CNA1 noticed that R1 was not in her room and alerted a nurse. The unit and facility was searched, R1 was not found to not be on the premises. R1 obtained a ride from college students located at the neighboring apartment and went to her friend's house. R1 was returned to the facility by local police with a bruise to her right eye, right hand, and right arm. On 01/29/2025 at approximately 5:34 PM, the State Agency (SA) determined that the facility's non-compliance with one or more federal health, safety, and/or quality regulations has caused or was likely to cause serious injury, serious harm, serious impairment, or death. On 01/29/2025 at 5:52 PM, the Administrator was notified that the allegation of elopement for R1 constituted Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) at F689 and the IJ template was presented. On 01/29/2025 at 7:07 PM, the facility provided acceptable plans of removal for the IJs. Review of the facility's removal plan and verification of implementation determined the facility had corrected their own deficiency, related to the IJ being identified as Past-noncompliance. An extended survey was completed on 01/31/2025 due to the failure constituting substandard quality of care. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Elopement Response Guidelines, effective date 05/01/2006 stated, It is the responsibility of all staff to provide a safe environment for all residents. Review of R1's Face Sheet revealed R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including but not limited to: generalized anxiety disorder, vascular dementia, and unspecified dementia with other behavioral disturbance. Review of R1's Elopement Evaluation dated 01/23/2025 revealed R1 had no elopement risk factors, and an elopement care plan was not required. Review of R1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date of 11/02/2024 revealed R1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, indicating no cognitive impairment. Further review of the MDS revealed there were no wandering behaviors exhibited. Review of R1's Progress Note dated 01/25/2025 at 9:00 PM revealed, Resident noted to be upset about a dress that belonged to another resident. Resident was last seen by this nurse on the peach unit around 5:30 pm - 6:00 pm talking to staff. At 7:00 pm, certified nursing assistant (CNA) alerted staff that she was unable to find resident. Staff immediately searched all rooms and the entire facility. Upon searching staff noticed resident's walker on the hill, next to apartment buildings. While staff continued to search, some college students stated they had seen the resident and gave her a ride to her preferred address. Resident's family was updated throughout the process. Director of Nursing (DON) and administrator notified. DON notified provider staff. Review of R1's Progress Note dated 01/25/2025 at 9:41 PM revealed Resident returned to facility in the custody of local police authorities. Resident returned with bruising around eye, bruising noted to back of right hand and right forearm, and a kerlix wrapped around her left forearm. DON present during this time and is aware. DON walked resident to her room and spoke with resident outside of her room in the hallway prior to leaving facility for the night. Resident took her medications whole without difficulty, vital signs stable. No complaints of pain or discomfort noted. Notified responsible party of patient return. Review of Blue Ridge Palmetto Elopement Event Sheet dated 01/25/2025 revealed, Resident left the facility. Contributing factors: Dementia and Anxiety Disorder. Yes, was selected to there being recent events, trauma, new diagnosis, or other stressors/losses. Description given; resident was upset about a dress that does not belong to her. During an interview on 01/29/2025 at 1:17 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)1 revealed, I am familiar with the incident. It was my first time on that unit. As I walked in and getting report, the oncoming CNA did rounds and noticed that the resident was not there. The day shift nurse was still there, and we were in the middle of report. We started searching for the resident. We went in all the rooms on the unit, then the facility. We walked outside and the nurse noted the walker on the hill going toward the apartments. The nurse notified every one of her rollator. Staff member went and knocked on doors and ended speaking with college students. They said we seen her out here and we gave her a ride. She told them where she wanted to go. The college kids took her to the address. When she got there the occupants of the house let the resident in and they left. I went back into the facility to see that the police and the Director of Nursing (DON) was in the facility. When the resident returned, she had bruising on her right hand and right arm. She had an eye that was bruised, and kerlix wrapped on the left arm. I assessed what I seen and the DON walked her to her room. The resident was rowdy about an incident that happened prior to her leaving. She was upset and wanted to leave because of it. It was about a dress, but she was going on about other things. The DON is the person who calmed her down and we assisted her to bed. During an interview on 01/29/2025 at 1:55 PM, the DON revealed, Yes, I am familiar with the incident. I received a phone call saying they were unable to find R1. They checked the unit and facility. Code Dr Hunt (the elopement code) was started, and a nurse found her walker that was on the hill towards the apartment building. The police were already notified. I went to the Magnolia unit then to the apartments. A girl stated that an elderly lady came to her door and said her car broke down. Police officer was there and got the address and went to the address given. Resident had on Sketchers tennis shoes, a long sleeve shirt, a sweater, and a pocketbook, upon her return. She never had signs of elopement and we never had an issue prior to the dispute about a dress. She stated, She did not want to be here anymore, and her daughter told her to leave this place then. R1 was last seen around 6 PM and she returned to the facility at 9:15 PM. We changed the wander guards because of the door will alarm. If they hold the door, it will open, but it will alarm. During an interview on 01/29/2025 at 2:17 PM, CNA1 revealed, I came in and I started picking up trays. I went to her (R1) room, and I seen that it was dark, and her tray was not touched. I asked the nurse where R1 was located. I was told that she was in her room. I checked the rooms on the floor. We did a Dr. Hunt, she was not in the facility, so we went outside and searched. It was cold that day. The last CNA to see her was around 6 pm. We found her walker on the hill going up towards the college apartments. I spoke with the college kids, and they told me that she asked them for help to go to (a friend's house). They gave her a ride to her friend's home. We got the address to where she was. It took the sheriff a while to bring her back. She was determined not to return, and she stated that if she gets another chance she will not come back. There is a problem with the door lock on the Peach Unit. It has been reported, and they told me that it has been checked by maintenance. I told them that it is a problem and that is where she got out at. During an interview on 01/29/2025 at 2:31 PM, R1 revealed, I left the facility because I went to the section to play some games. People steal here and I asked a good friend to watch my purse. They keep stealing my food, my clothes and my money. I told the three nurses at the nurse's station. A man punched the door code, and I went out. The only reason they knew to find me was because of my daughter. It was dark and my way was lit by the moon. I went up the hill to not be seen by the people at this facility. I tried to push the rollator up the hill but could not, so I tried to pick it up and I hit my eye. I left because they do nothing for you. I did not see anyone and then I seen a man. I asked him to take me to my girlfriend's house. He got another boy and girl, and they told me they go to Limestone College. They drove me to my girlfriend's house. I will not answer the question if I will try to leave again. The facility's plan of removal included the following: The immediate action taken for this deficient practice include the following: -A body audit was done on Resident #1 upon return to the facility. -Resident was placed on 15 minute checks. -Emotional support was provided to resident by the Director of Nursing. -Inservice was completed 1/25/25-1/26/25 to all staff by the Staff Development Coordinator and Director of Nursing on CMS guidelines regarding elopement. -Maintenance staff checked and recorded that all doors on units with residents who are at risk for elopement were found to be in working order. Facility recognizes that all residents have the potential to be affected by this deficient practice. Measures put into place to ensure that this deficient practice does not reoccur include the following: -A professional contractor was brought into the building to inspect all alarms and provide any work required if issues were found. -The facility requested a quote from the contractor to upgrade all door monitoring alarms in the facility. Monitors to be put in place to ensure the deficient practice does not reoccur include: -Door alarms inspections were increased from weekly to daily by the maintenance staff. -Inservice will be provided to staff regarding any issues with the doors/alarms must be reported directly to the Director of Nursing or Administrator. -The facility has set the TELS system, used to document the completion of the monitoring, to alert the administrator via e-mail and mobile application that the task was completed. Administrator will take findings of this monitoring tool to the QAPI committee monthly for three months and quarterly thereafter until the issue is deemed to require no further review. The facility alleges compliance on 1/26/2025.
Aug 2024 3 deficiencies 1 IJ (1 facility-wide)
CRITICAL (L)

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Someone could have died · This affected most or all residents

⚠️ Facility-wide issue

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** On 08/15/24, the facility provided an acceptable IJ Removal Plan which included the following: Inservice was completed on 08/13/...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** On 08/15/24, the facility provided an acceptable IJ Removal Plan which included the following: Inservice was completed on 08/13/24, to 100% of the dietary staff by the Staff Development Coordinator on CMS guidelines. Refrigerator temperatures are to be maintained at 41F. Freezer temperatures are to be maintained at 0F. Temperatures are to be recorded: first shift, midday, and end of second shift. If any temperatures do not fall within guidelines, the supervisor is to be notified and use emergency food supply. Do not use food from equipment that does not meet regulatory temperature. A new refrigerator and freezer temperature log were created, specific instructions were placed on the logs regarding required temperature and actions to take if temperature does not meet regulation. 100% present of staff were in-serviced under the new temperature log on 08/13/24. New logs were implemented on 08/13/24. Facility recognizes that all residents have the potential to be affected by this deficient practice. Measures put into place to ensure that this deficient practice does not occur again include the following: education to dietary staff on proper storage and maintenance of food will be provided upon hire and annually. Dietary staff will be required to complete an annual competency on these requirements. Education was provided to staff on taking food temperatures prior to servicing and recording with every meal. Unannounced observations of temperature logs will be conducted by the Administrator, Dietary Manager, and Registered Dietician. Dietary Manager was re-educated on 08/13/24 on the maintenance system which identifies maintenance needs in all departments. Monitors to be put in place to ensure the deficient practice does not reoccur include new temperature logs were created and implemented. Re-education on the maintenance system and unannounced observations. The Dietary Manager will be informed of any adverse findings, re-education will be provided. Results of these audits will be brought to the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee monthly for the next months and quarterly thereafter until the issue is deemed to require no further review. Other actions taken include: A contracted refrigeration repair service was called to the facility and repairs were provided on 08/12/24 and 08/13/24. All refrigeration equipment in the facility was checked by contracted refrigeration technician. All food in the effected freezer and refrigerator was discarded. Emergency food supplies were utilized until the new refrigerator was installed and brought to proper temperature. Temporary refrigerator was purchased and installed on 08/13/24. The facility obtained new perishable food and placed them in the new refrigerator until food supplies are delivered from distributor on 08/14/24. Based on observation, interview, review of facility policy, and review of the Centers of Disease Control (CDC) recommendation for Food Safety, the facility failed to ensure that food items were properly stored and maintained below 41 Degrees Fahrenheit (F) to reduce the potential of foodborne illnesses. The facility further failed to ensure that monitoring of kitchen equipment (refrigerators and freezer) was completed accurately for 1 of 1 kitchen. On 08/13/24 at 1:30 PM, the Administrator was notified that the failure to ensure food items were properly stored and maintained below 41 Degrees Fahrenheit (F) and the failure to ensure the monitoring of kitchen equipment was completed accurately constituted Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) at F812. On 08/13/24 at 1:30 PM, the survey team provided the Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON) with a copy of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) Template and informed the facility IJ existed as of 08/09/24. The IJ was related to §483.60 - Food and Nutrition Services. On 08/15/24, the facility provided an acceptable IJ Removal Plan. On 08/15/24 at 11:50 AM, the survey team validated the facility's corrective actions and removed the IJ as of 08/15/24. The facility remained out of compliance at a scope and severity level of F. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Food Storage revealed, Sufficient storage facilities are provided to keep foods safe, wholesome, and appetizing. Food is stored, prepared, and by methods designed to prevent contamination. Procedures include, Temperature for refrigerators should be 41 degrees F and below. They must be recorded daily. Every refrigerator must be equipped with an internal thermometer. Cooked foods must be stored above raw foods to prevent contamination. Freezer temperatures: Temperatures for freezer be 0 degrees or below and must be recorded daily. Holding temperature for frozen foods is 0 degrees or below. Frozen meats must be defrosted in a refrigerator on tray on a lower shelf. Every freezer must be equipped with an internal thermometer, even if equipped with an external thermometer. Chemicals must be clearly labeled, kept in original containers when possible, and kept in a locked area away from food. Review of the facility policy titled Hair Restraints revealed, Hair restraints shall be worn by all Dining Services staff when in food production, dishwashing areas or when serving food from the steam table. Procedures include, Staff shall wear restraints in all food production, dishwashing and serving areas. Hair restraints, hats, and or bear guards shall be used to prevent hair from contacting exposed food. Facial hair is discouraged, any facial hair that is longer than the eyebrow shall require coverage with a beard guard in the production and dishwashing areas. Review of the facility policy titled Refrigerator and Freezer Temperatures revealed, A food item is selected, and the temperature is taken. If this is the first check of the day, and the food item(s) are below 41 F and cannot be validated to have been below 41 F for less than four hours, the food is discarded. If this is a visual check during normal operating hours, and the food is below 41 F the staff member will validate if it has been in the danger zone for four or less the product is moved to another refrigerator/freezer and monitored to cool to proper temperature within four hours. If the food is below 41F the unit will be emptied and the food stuff transferred to another refrigerator/freezer and the unit locked out/tagged out per facility policy. Food stuff will be transferred back into the refrigerator/freezer until it is repaired and returned to service or until the temperature reaches and maintains the appropriate temperature. Review of the Centers of Disease Control (CDC) recommendation for Food Safety revealed, CDC Steps to Food Safety . Prevention Steps and Strategies dated April 29, 2024 revealed, Chill: refrigerate promptly. Bacteria can multiply rapidly if left at room temperature or in the Danger Zone between 40°F and 140°F. Never leave perishable food out for more than 2 hours (or 1 hour if exposed to temperatures above 90°F). Keep your refrigerator at 40°F or below and your freezer at 0°F or below and know when to throw food out before it spoils. If your refrigerator doesn't have a built-in thermometer, keep an appliance thermometer inside it to check the temperature. Package warm or hot food into several clean, shallow containers and then refrigerate. It is okay to put small portions of hot food in the refrigerator since they will chill faster. Refrigerate perishable food (meat, seafood, dairy, cut fruit, some vegetables, and cooked leftovers) within 2 hours. If the food is exposed to temperatures above 90°F, like a hot car or picnic, refrigerate it within 1 hour. Thaw frozen food safely in the refrigerator, in cold water, or in the microwave. Never thaw food on the counter because bacteria multiply quickly in the parts of the food that reach room temperature. During an initial tour of the kitchen on 08/12/24 at 10:43 AM, the dry food storage revealed the following: 1-108 oz (once) dented can of corn beef hash. 1-105 oz dented can of sliced carrots. 1-92 oz box of instant mashed potatoes on the floor. 14 boxes of [NAME] oatmeal with a best by date of 07/27/24. 1-25 lb (pound) box of premium parboiled rice opened, with no open date and not sealed. 2-10 lb boxes of lasagna noodles open, not sealed or labeled with an open date. 2-10 lb bags of penne pasta open and not labeled. 1-16 oz box of raisins opened and not sealed. 5-16 oz boxes of raisins with a best by date of 08/09/23. 2-10 lb packages of spaghetti noodles opened, not sealed, and not labeled. 1 package of 5 burrito wraps opened with no open date and not sealed. Sugar bin not labeled and no scoop. During an observation and interview with the Dietary Manager (DM) on 08/12/24 at 10:50 AM, the walk-in refrigerator revealed the internal thermometer temperature reading at 60 F. Further observation revealed the refrigerator ceiling fans motor cover has ice accumulated on its surface and was actively defrosting, with a black substance coating the pipes connected to the fan. The DM revealed that the veggie walk-in refrigerator had been down but came back up today. The DM states that they receive deliveries three times a week and staff check for outdated items in the refrigerator once a week. During an observation on 08/12/24 at 10:55 AM, of the walk-in refrigerator revealed the following food items that were expired/not properly labeled and or stored: 2-5 lb containers of cottage cheese with a best by date of 07/29/24. 1-5 lb container of cottage cheese with best by date of 07/01/24. 2-10 lb boxes of macaroni salad with a use by date of 08/11/24. 7 prepared bowls of salad not dated. During an observation on 08/12/24 at 11:37 AM, of the meat freezer, revealed a puddle of water on the floor and approximately 40 boxes of food items actively defrosting, with some boxes having water damage and dripping with water. Further observation revealed the following food items were not properly stored 3 bags of garlic bread opened with no open date. 4-4 lb bags of sweet peas not properly stored. 2-5 lb bags of white diced chicken meat not properly stored. Further observation of the meat freezer revealed the internal thermometer was unreadable, the outside digital thermometer displayed an error code (APn6). The temperature log for the meat freezer for 08/12/24 documented, -3 F. During an interview with the DM and Maintenance Manager on 08/12/24 at 11:55 AM, revealed the first shift cook checked the meat freezer temperature when she arrived this morning. There were no issues with the temperature. The DM further explained that there is more food in the meat freezer due to the veggie freezer being down and that there is never usually any water on the floor. During the interview the Maintenance Manager stated, I think they had the door open for a long period of time. During an observation and interview on 08/12/24, during the lunch meal prep, revealed Kitchen Staff (KS)1 prepping food without a beard restraint. KS1 stated that male staff are expected to wear beard restraints when prepping food. KS1 put on a beard guard after the interview. During a follow up interview with the DM on 08/12/24, revealed that staff members are expected to cover all hair, including facial hair. During an observation on 08/12/24 at 1:00 PM, the stand-up freezer revealed an internal thermometer temperature of 52 F and the external thermometer gauge reading at 43 F. During an observation on 08/12/24 at 1:01 PM, the ice cream freezer revealed an internal thermometer temperature of 52 F and the external thermometer gauge reading at 43 F. During an observation on 08/12/24 at 1:10 PM, the walk-in cooler revealed the internal thermometer reading at 50 F and the external thermometer gauge reading at 43 F. Review of the temperature log for the meat walk-in freezer for August 2024, revealed the following: 08/12/24 the morning/AM temperature was documented at -3 F. 08/01/24 - 08/12/24 the afternoon/PM logs were incomplete. Review of the temperature log of the stand-up freezer for August 2024, revealed missing initials for morning/AM temperature checks on 08/07/24 - 08/12/24. Review of the temperature log for the ice cream freezer for August 2024, revealed the following: 08/09/24 - 08/12/24 missing morning/AM documentation. Review of the temperature log for the veggie freezer for August 2024, revealed the following: 08/01/24 no morning documentation; afternoon/PM (DOWN). 08/02/24 no documentation. 08/03/24 no morning documentation; afternoon/PM (DOWN) 08/04/24 no afternoon/PM documentation. 08/07/24 no morning/AM documentation. 08/08/24 no documentation. 08/09/24 no morning documentation; afternoon (DOWN). During an interview on 08/12/24 at 1:51 PM, the DM revealed there were no issues with neither the refrigerator nor freezers this morning. The DM continued to explain that when there is an issue, kitchen staff notifies them immediately and they call maintenance. During an interview on 08/12/24 at 1:55 PM, the 2nd Shift [NAME] revealed today's dinner will be a cold plate with deli sandwiches, macaroni salad and cucumber salad with an alternative of patty melts, scallop potatoes, and carrots. The 2nd Shift [NAME] stated they only had to prepare the sandwiches, patty melts and scallop potatoes. The 2nd Shift [NAME] further stated the macaroni salad and cucumber salad were prepared yesterday, we usually prepare those items a day in advance. The 2nd Shift [NAME] concluded temperatures for the refrigerators and freezers were already completed when they arrived to work today and they check them and document them daily at night before the they leave. During an interview on 08/12/24 at 1:59 PM, the Maintenance Director revealed they were unaware of any issues with the refrigerator/freezer, and there were no issues earlier this morning. During an observation on 08/12/24 at 2:11 PM, revealed the walk-in cooler internal thermometer reading at 55 F. During this observation, a green sanitizing bucket was observed next to a container of sliced cucumbers and boiled eggs. Additionally, there was a moist towel above the container storing boiled eggs. During an observation on 08/12/24 at 2:22 PM, revealed the stand-up freezer internal thermometer temperature at 30 F. The vegetable freezer revealed an internal thermometer temperature of 30 F. During a phone interview on 08/12/24 at 2:32 PM, the 1st Shift [NAME] stated, I check freezer and refrigerator temperatures when I use them. The 1st Shift [NAME] further stated the freezer on the porch wasn ' t' freezing well and staff noticed the issue on Friday [08/09/24], they had to throw away a few wet boxes because they were defrosting in the freezer. The 1st shift [NAME] recalled throwing away food yesterday [08/11/24], due to the defrosting food items. The 1st Shift [NAME] concluded they notified the DM about the freezers and was told that it was reported to Maintenance Staff. During a phone interview with the Registered Dietician (RD) on 08/12/24 at 2:56 PM, revealed the RD was made aware of the kitchen equipment (cooler/freezer) not reaching an adequate temperature of 41 F or below. The RD stated that she recommended the facility use the emergency food supply for the dinner meal to ensure foods will be stored/served at the appropriate temperature. During an observation and interview with the DM on 08/12/24 at 3:22 PM, revealed the kitchen staff plan to serve cold items as planned since cold items were prepared prior to the refrigerator/freezers malfunction. Additionally, the DM revealed the cold food items have been placed into the veggie cooler to cool down. The DM stated that the menu for the dinner meal is deli sandwiches, macaroni salad, cucumber salad, scallop potatoes, carrots, and bean salad. The DM stated the macaroni salad and cucumber salad were prepared in advance, and the carrots and bean salad were from the canned goods/emergency supply. The concluded tomorrow's meal (08/13/24) would be changed due to the lack of working equipment and that the food items would come from the facilities emergency supply. During an observation of the walk-in cooler, where the macaroni salad and cucumber salad were stored, revealed the internal thermometer temperature of 55 F. During an interview on 08/12/24 at 4:08 PM, the Administrator revealed they were made aware of the issues in the kitchen related to the refrigerators and freezer today. The Administrator stated that the cold items that were prepared yesterday such as the macaroni salad and cucumber salad would be served tonight since they were prepared before the appliances malfunctioned and that the facility would serve food from their emergency supply tomorrow, until the temporary portable freezers were delivered to the facility by their food vendor. During an observation on 08/12/24 at 4:32 PM, of the 2nd Shift [NAME] conducting holding temperature checks of the dinner meal, revealed the following: Pasta Salad Puree - 46 F. Deli Meat Puree - 45 F. Macaroni Salad - 68 F. Deli Sandwiches - 58 F. Cucumber Salad - 62 F. All items were discarded after observation. During an interview with the 2nd Shift [NAME] on 08/12/24 at 4:35 PM, the 2nd Shift [NAME] revealed the cold items were prepared the day before and had been sitting in the walk-in cooler all day and was moved into the stand-up refrigerator about an hour ago. During an observation on 08/12/24 at 4:39 PM, revealed the stand-up refrigerator had an internal thermometer temperature of 50 F. During an observation on 08/12/24 at 4:50 PM, revealed the meat freezer had an internal thermometer temperature of 30 F. During an observation on 08/12/24 at 4:51 PM, revealed the stand-up refrigerator had an internal thermometer temperature of 50 F, and the external thermometer gauge reading was 45 F. During an observation on 08/12/24 at 4:53 PM, revealed the walk-in refrigerator had an internal temperature of 52 F. And the veggie freezer revealed an internal thermometer temperature of 20 F. During an observation and interview on 08/12/24 at 5:00 PM, the Administrator was informing them (kitchen staff) the food that was planned for the dinner meal no longer meet the requirements of being served safely according to the CDC standards and federal regulation. The Administrator stated the kitchen staff will not serve that meal and will prepare a different meal using their emergency food supply. During an interview on 08/12/24 at an unspecified time, Resident (R)220 stated, The food is awful, for example the toast is rubbery and scrambled eggs are nasty. I was recently (within the last week but unsure of which day) given spoiled milk and it wasn't expired but the taste and smell was disgusting. R220 further stated that they spoke with someone from the kitchen related to the food and substitutions, and for a few days the food improved. Now, they are serving foods that don't match his preferences. Review of R220's Face Sheet revealed R220 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including but not limited to: muscle weakness, pain, and lack of coordination. Review of R220's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date of 08/09/24, revealed R220 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 which indicates R220 is cognitively intact. During an interview on 08/12/24 at an unspecified time, R37 revealed their lunch and dinner meal is always served cold. R37 further stated at times they are not able to identify what they are being served and calls it mystery meat. Review of R37's Face Sheet revealed R37 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including but not limited to: dementia without behaviors, muscle weakness, and type 2 diabetes. Review of R37's Quarterly MDS with an ARD of 07/17/24, revealed R37 has a BIMS score of 14 out of 15, which indicates she is cognitively intact. During an observation and record review on 08/13/24 at 9:30 AM, revealed the meat freezer external thermometer was malfunctioning, displaying an error code APn6, the internal thermometer reading was 10 F. Review of the August 2024 Meat Freezer Temperature Log for 08/13/24, revealed a documented temperature of -3 F with no initials for who documented the log. During an observation and record review on 08/13/24 at 9:53 AM, revealed the walk-in refrigerator's internal thermometer temperature reading at 50 F and the external thermometer gauge reading at -40 F. Review of the Walk-In Refrigerator August 2024 Temperature Log, revealed no documentation for the morning log on 08/13/24. During an observation and record review on 08/13/24 at 9:54 AM, revealed the stand-up refrigerator had no food items at this time, the internal thermometer temperature read at 70 F. Review of the August 2024 Stand-Up Refrigerator Temperature Log revealed the log for 08/14/24 was 42 F. During an interview on 08/13/24 at 9:55 AM, the DM revealed the temperature for the stand-up refrigerator was reading 50 F this morning. The DM states she was notified by the first shift cook, who came in at 5:00 AM, of the temperature of the refrigerator when she (DM) came in at 7:00 AM. The DM revealed the food that was in the stand-up refrigerator was moved to a refrigerator on one of the halls and what couldn't fit was discarded. The DM explained the residents were served bacon, sausage and eggs which were pulled from the stand-up refrigerator, along with oatmeal and grits that came from the dry storage for breakfast. During an interview on 08/13/24 at 10:00 AM, the 1st Shift [NAME] revealed for breakfast the residents were served bacon, sausage, eggs, grits, and oatmeal. The 1st Shift [NAME] stated the bacon, and sausage were pulled from the stand-up refrigerator and the eggs came from the walk-in refrigerator. The 1st Shift [NAME] stated the temperatures for the freezers should be -3 F and the refrigerators should be 40 F, I think. The 1st Shift [NAME] further explained, I write down the temperatures that are shown on the outside of the freezers and refrigerators. The 1st Shift [NAME] confirmed that they documented the temperature for the meat freezer this morning was -3 F and the temperature for the stand- up refrigerator was 42 F. When asked if the stand-up refrigerator's temperature was reading 42 F, was that temperature too high to use the food from that refrigerator, the 1st Shift [NAME] responded, No, I don't think it was too high. During an interview with the DM on 08/13/24 at 10:07 AM, revealed the temperatures for the freezers should be below zero and the refrigerator temperatures should be below 40 F or 41 F. The DM further stated that the food from the stand- up refrigerator was moved as fast as possible to a refrigerator on the unit and the rest was thrown away if it couldn't fit. The DM stated for lunch today they will be using the emergency supply and they used liquid eggs and that the food needed for today's breakfast was pulled from the walk-in refrigerator the night before to make it more convenient for the cook to start their prep when they come in. When asked if the food from the stand-up refrigerator, which had a temperature of 42 F, should have been used to serve the residents, the DM replied, probably not. During an observation on 08/13/24 at 11:27 AM, the 1st Shift [NAME] and DM, during the lunch meal temperature observation, revealed the following items not at the appropriate temperature and were discarded: Milk - 44 F. Cranberry Juice - 47 F. Mighty Shake (nourishment drink) - 46 F. Further observation and interview with the DM revealed that those drinks were pulled from the walk-in cooler. During observation of the walk-in cooler, the internal thermometer temperature had a reading of 55 F. The DM confirmed that the temperature in the refrigerator was higher than recommended. During an observation and interview on 08/13/24 at 12:00 PM, of the refrigerator in the Therapy Room on the Peach Unit revealed the food that was moved earlier from the stand-up refrigerator in the kitchen. Further observation revealed a pan of scrambled eggs, 1 pan of sausage, 1 pan labeled pureed bacon, 1 pan labeled pureed meat, and a bag of salad mix. The DM revealed that deliveries are received on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. An order was placed on Monday and a delivery will come on Wednesday, they will place an order on Wednesday to replenish the emergency supply. The internal temperature of the Therapy Room Refrigerator was at 41 F, there was no documentation related to daily logs of the temperature for this refrigerator. During an interview on 08/13/24 at 1:25 PM, the 1st Shift [NAME] revealed they documented the temperatures for the refrigerators and freezers by reading the external thermometer. During the interview the survey team asked how they were able document the temperature of the meat freezer due to the error code and they stated that they were unsure. During an observation on 08/14/24 at 11:20 AM, of the lunch meal temperature check revealed the temperature of the toss salad was 71 F, and was discarded after observation. During an observation and interview on 08/14/24 at 5:50 PM, revealed the walk-in cooler had an internal thermometer temperature of 47.5 F. The DM confirmed the current temperature of the walk-in cooler was out of compliance. The DM further stated the food in the walk-in cooler was delivered earlier in the morning and the food would have to be discarded. During an observation on 08/14/24 at 6:00 PM, the Administrator was informing the kitchen staff that the Immediate Jeopardy is still on-going due to the non-compliance in the kitchen because of improper temperatures in the walk-in cooler. The Administrator further informed the kitchen staff the shipment that arrived earlier would have to be discard. During an observation and interview on 08/15/24 at 11:46 AM, the Walk-In Cooler, Meat Freezer, and Stand- Up Refrigerator (all malfunctioning) were empty. The Veggie Freezer read 0 F. Observation of the Temporary Refrigerator revealed an internal temperature of 40 F (observation during lunch time and staff using this fridge to prep). The DM revealed that all food being prepped is coming from the Temporary Refrigerator and Veggie Freezer.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0727 (Tag F0727)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have appropriate Registered Nurse (RN) staffing for 8 hours a day, for 3 of 6 days reviewed Findings include: Review of facility daily sche...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have appropriate Registered Nurse (RN) staffing for 8 hours a day, for 3 of 6 days reviewed Findings include: Review of facility daily schedule for 01/17/24, revealed the facility did not have a registered nurse in the facility for 8 consecutive hours. Review of facility Patient Per Day Posting for 01/17/24, revealed the facility did not have a registered nurse in the facility for 8 consecutive hours. Review of facility daily schedule for 02/10/24, revealed the facility did not have a registered nurse in the facility for 8 consecutive hours. Review of facility Patient Per Day Posting for 02/10/24, revealed the facility did not have a registered nurse in the facility for 8 consecutive hours. Review of facility daily schedule for 02/24/24, the facility did not have a registered nurse in the facility for 8 consecutive hours. Review of facility Patient Per Day Posting for 02/24/24, the facility did not have a registered nurse in the facility for 8 consecutive hours. During an interview on 08/15/24 at 3:59 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) revealed that the facility does not have a policy related to staffing and that they follow the federal regulation. During an interview on 8/15/24 at 4:21 PM, the DON and Staffing Coordinator revealed it is expected to have 8 hours of RN coverage every day. The DON and Staffing Coordinator revealed that the facility did not have an RN for 8 consecutive hours for the following days: 01/27/24, 02/10/24 and 02/24/24.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0813 (Tag F0813)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide a policy related to the handling of or monitoring of outside food bought into the facility, for 1 of 1 main kitchen. Findings incl...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide a policy related to the handling of or monitoring of outside food bought into the facility, for 1 of 1 main kitchen. Findings include: During an interview on 08/14/24 at 11:27 AM, the Dietary Manager (DM) revealed the facility does not have a policy related to personal food. During an interview on 08/14/24 at 2:35 PM, the Administrator revealed there is no policy related to monitoring outside food coming into the facility.
Mar 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0602 (Tag F0602)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on review of the facility policy, record review, and interview, the facility failed to prohibit misappropriation of proper...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on review of the facility policy, record review, and interview, the facility failed to prohibit misappropriation of property for 2 of 2 residents ((R)3 and R4) related to missing medications. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Medication Administration: General Guidelines (Revised 04/10/2019) stated, Medications are administered as prescribed, in accordance with good nursing principles and practices and only by persons legally authorized to do. Personnel authorized to administer medications do so only after they have familiarized themselves with the medication. Review of R3's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including, but not limited to; anxiety, pain, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and gastro-esophageal reflux disease. Review of R3's Physician Orders revealed an order for, Hydrocodone-acetaminophen 7.5-325 mg (milligrams); take 1 tablet twice a day for severe pain. During an interview on 03/11/24 at 2:16 PM, R3 stated, I did not get my medicine on 11/27/23. I am unsure of the type of medication, but I was in a lot of pain from my sciatic nerve. She stated this was the only time she recalls not getting her medication. During record review for 03/11/24 at 2:30 PM, review of the Controlled Drug Record for R3 showed HYDROco/APAP Tab 7.5-325 mg 1 tab by mouth twice daily as needed. The medications were signed for on the following dates: 11/22/23 at 0900, 1700 (5 PM)- 1 tablet removed with unrecognized signatures 11/24/23 at 0800- 1 tablet removed, unrecognized signature 11/25/23 at 1900 (7 PM)- 1 tablet removed, unrecognized signature 11/26/23 at 1300 (1 PM)- 1 tablet removed Agency Nurse signature Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed there was no administration of the medication. Review of R4's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to; left femur fracture, muscle weakness, and left hip pain. Review of R4's Physician Orders revealed an order for, Hydrocodone-acetaminophen-Schedule II tablet; 7.5-325 mg; amount 1 tablet oral every 8 hours. During an interview on 3/11/24 at 2:20 PM, R4 stated I was in pain and did not receive medicine on 11/27/23. She said this was the only time she recalls not getting her meds. Review of the CDR for R4 revealed, HYDROco/APAP Tab 7.5-325mg 1 tab by mouth every 8 hours for 30 days. The medications were signed for on the following dates: 11/25/23 at 0800- 1 tablet removed, unrecognized signature 11/25/23 at 4 PM- 1 tablet removed, unrecognized signature 11/26/23 at 1200- 1 tablet removed, unrecognized signature 11/26/23 at 0800-1 tablet removed, Agency Nurse signature 11/26/23 at 1600 (4 PM)-1 tablet removed, Agency Nurse signature Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed there was no administration of the medication. During an interview on 3/11/24 at 3:11 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated, The cart count was correct per the third shift nurse. The third shift nurse saw that medications were signed out crazy. The medications were signed out with dates off and the signatures didn't match. During a phone interview on 3/11/24 at 3:46 PM, an attempt was made to contact the alleged Nurse through the staffing agency. Per the Regional [NAME] President of the staffing agency, she stated We are unable to give out that information. I can pass it up to get permission. She stated to send additional information via email.
Jul 2022 1 deficiency
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to: 1. ensure foods stored in the freezer and dry storage were labeled, dated, and resealed closed when opened; 2. e...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to: 1. ensure foods stored in the freezer and dry storage were labeled, dated, and resealed closed when opened; 2. ensure cleanliness of dishes was maintained and all pans and dishes were air dried before stacking the items; 3. ensure equipment was in working order; and 4. ensure the correct size spoons and ladles were used for portion sizes. These failures had the potential to affect 71 out of 73 residents in the facility who consumed food from the kitchen. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy, Sanitizing Flatware, not dated, revealed The following procedure will be used to sanitize flatware .After washing, allow to air dry. Review of the facility's policy, Pot and Pan Washing, not dated, revealed Pots and pans must be air dried .Dish towels must never be used. The following observations in the kitchen were made with and verified by [NAME] 2 and/or the Dietary Manager (DM). 1. On 07/06/22 at 9:30 AM, the dry storage room contained one large plastic bin of salt that was not sealed closed. The following items were not labeled and dated: one bag of gravy mix, one chocolate cake mix, and a plastic sugar bin. A bin that contained food thickener was dated 05/21/21. The freezer contained one bag of waffles, one bag of biscuits, one bag of pork patties, and one bag of chicken that was not labeled, dated, or sealed closed. The opened bags of food all contained ice from being left open. The refrigerator had a container of pureed strawberries with a date of 06/02/22 and a deli salad container with no label and/or date. 2. On 07/06/22 at 9:30 AM, there were five wet loaf pans, and seven wet bowls observed stacked together. The lids used to cover the plate warmers were dirty with food debris. Observation and interview on 07/08/22 at 12:16 PM revealed Dietary Aide (DA) 2 collecting clean bowls and using her fingers to hold multiple bowls at one time. DA2's fingers were touching the inside of the bowls, and she did not have on gloves. Continued observation revealed DA2 drinking a cold drink that was located on a shelf under the tray line. When asked if she was supposed to have a drink in the kitchen while working on the tray line, she stated she was hot. Observation was made of DA2 using a cloth to dry a serving spoon. The DM instructed DA2 to wash the spoon again. 3. On 07/06/22 at 9:30 AM, the last compartment on the steam table was not working, so staff added boiling water to the compartment to keep the food hot. The plate warmer was not turned on. Observation and interview on 07/08/22 at 11:55 AM, revealed [NAME] 1 taking the temperature of the Brussel sprouts while on the stove with an open flame. When asked if this is how she usually temps the food, [NAME] 1 stated No. 4. Continued observation on 07/08/22 at 11:55 AM revealed five ladles and spoons that had been gathered for use in the food line were the incorrect size for proper portion sizes. When [NAME] 1 was asked what the serving size should be used, she did not know so the DM obtained the correct serving spoon or ladle to use. During an interview on 07/08/22 at 12:26 PM, the DM had no comment about the observations. Interview with the Administrator on 07/08/22 at 4:23 PM revealed that she stated, My expectations are that the regulations are to be followed. There is no excuse.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
  • "What safeguards are in place to prevent abuse and neglect?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: Federal abuse finding, 4 life-threatening violation(s), Special Focus Facility, $42,172 in fines. Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 9 deficiencies on record, including 4 critical (life-threatening) violations. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
  • • $42,172 in fines. Higher than 94% of South Carolina facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
  • • Grade F (0/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: This facility has a substantiated abuse finding. Extreme caution advised. Explore alternatives.

About This Facility

What is Brookview Healthcare Center's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns Brookview Healthcare Center an overall rating of 1 out of 5 stars, which is considered much below average nationally. Within South Carolina, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.

How is Brookview Healthcare Center Staffed?

CMS rates Brookview Healthcare Center's staffing level at 2 out of 5 stars, which is below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 53%, compared to the South Carolina average of 46%.

What Have Inspectors Found at Brookview Healthcare Center?

State health inspectors documented 9 deficiencies at Brookview Healthcare Center during 2022 to 2025. These included: 4 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death) and 5 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.

Who Owns and Operates Brookview Healthcare Center?

Brookview Healthcare Center is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 132 certified beds and approximately 106 residents (about 80% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in Gaffney, South Carolina.

How Does Brookview Healthcare Center Compare to Other South Carolina Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in South Carolina, Brookview Healthcare Center's overall rating (1 stars) is below the state average of 2.8, staff turnover (53%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (1 stars) is much below the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Brookview Healthcare Center?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "What safeguards and monitoring systems are in place to protect residents from abuse or neglect?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations, the substantiated abuse finding on record, and the below-average staffing rating.

Is Brookview Healthcare Center Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, Brookview Healthcare Center has documented safety concerns. The facility has 1 substantiated abuse finding (meaning confirmed case of resident harm by staff or other residents). Inspectors have issued 4 Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility is currently on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes nationwide). The facility has a 1-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in South Carolina. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.

Do Nurses at Brookview Healthcare Center Stick Around?

Brookview Healthcare Center has a staff turnover rate of 53%, which is 7 percentage points above the South Carolina average of 46%. Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.

Was Brookview Healthcare Center Ever Fined?

Brookview Healthcare Center has been fined $42,172 across 3 penalty actions. The South Carolina average is $33,501. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.

Is Brookview Healthcare Center on Any Federal Watch List?

Brookview Healthcare Center is currently an SFF Candidate, meaning CMS has identified it as potentially qualifying for the Special Focus Facility watch list. SFF Candidates have a history of serious deficiencies but haven't yet reached the threshold for full SFF designation. The facility is being monitored more closely — if problems continue, it may be added to the official watch list. Families should ask what the facility is doing to address the issues that led to this status.