Lake Moultrie Nursing Home
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Lake Moultrie Nursing Home has a Trust Grade of D, indicating below-average performance with some concerns about care quality. It ranks #116 out of 186 facilities in South Carolina, placing it in the bottom half, but is #2 out of 4 in Berkeley County, meaning it has only one local competitor that is better. The facility is making improvements, as it reduced its issues from 5 in 2023 to 3 in 2025. Staffing is a strength here, with a rating of 4 out of 5 stars and a turnover rate of 25%, significantly lower than the state average, showing that staff tend to stay and develop relationships with residents. However, the nursing home has faced $19,097 in fines, which is concerning and suggests recurring compliance problems. On the downside, there have been serious incidents, including a failure to update a resident's code status, which could have put them at risk during a medical emergency. Additionally, a resident with cognitive impairment sustained a hip fracture due to inadequate fall prevention measures. These issues highlight the need for improvement in care practices despite some strengths in staffing.
- Trust Score
- D
- In South Carolina
- #116/186
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ✓ Good
- 25% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 23 points below South Carolina's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
- Penalties ⚠ Watch
- $19,097 in fines. Higher than 76% of South Carolina facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
- Skilled Nurses ○ Average
- Each resident gets 36 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for South Carolina. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
- Violations ○ Average
- 10 deficiencies on record. Average for a facility this size. Mostly minor or procedural issues.
The Good
-
4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
-
Low Staff Turnover (25%) · Staff stability means consistent care
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover is low (25%)
23 points below South Carolina average of 48%
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, staff retention, fire safety.
The Bad
Below South Carolina average (2.8)
Below average - review inspection findings carefully
Below median ($33,413)
Minor penalties assessed
The Ugly 10 deficiencies on record
Jan 2025
3 deficiencies
1 IJ
CRITICAL
(J)
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Deficiency F0578
(Tag F0578)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure physician orders matched the reside...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure bruising to the chest was reported...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to administer oxygen at the physician pre...
Read full inspector narrative →
Apr 2023
5 deficiencies
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, interview, facility document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to consistently for...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0584)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and facility policy review,the facility failed to ensure a wheelchair cushion was not torn, w...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
PASARR Coordination
(Tag F0644)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a new Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) w...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0645
(Tag F0645)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) was a...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pressure Ulcer Prevention
(Tag F0686)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the necessary treatme...
Read full inspector narrative →
Sept 2021
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on meal observations, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that staff washed their hands and/or used hand sanitizer between residents to prevent cross contaminat...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observations, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure to label opened items in the walk-in freezer; failed to discard food in the walk-in refrigerator by the use by date;...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • 25% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 23 points below South Carolina's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: 1 life-threatening violation(s), 1 harm violation(s). Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 10 deficiencies on record, including 1 critical (life-threatening) violation. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
- • $19,097 in fines. Above average for South Carolina. Some compliance problems on record.
- • Grade D (46/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Lake Moultrie Nursing Home's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns Lake Moultrie Nursing Home an overall rating of 2 out of 5 stars, which is considered below average nationally. Within South Carolina, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.
How is Lake Moultrie Nursing Home Staffed?
CMS rates Lake Moultrie Nursing Home's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 25%, compared to the South Carolina average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Lake Moultrie Nursing Home?
State health inspectors documented 10 deficiencies at Lake Moultrie Nursing Home during 2021 to 2025. These included: 1 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death), 1 that caused actual resident harm, and 8 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.
Who Owns and Operates Lake Moultrie Nursing Home?
Lake Moultrie Nursing Home is owned by a government entity. Government-operated facilities are typically run by state, county, or municipal agencies. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 88 certified beds and approximately 80 residents (about 91% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in Saint Stephen, South Carolina.
How Does Lake Moultrie Nursing Home Compare to Other South Carolina Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in South Carolina, Lake Moultrie Nursing Home's overall rating (2 stars) is below the state average of 2.8, staff turnover (25%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (2 stars) is below the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Lake Moultrie Nursing Home?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations.
Is Lake Moultrie Nursing Home Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, Lake Moultrie Nursing Home has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 1 Immediate Jeopardy citation (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 2-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in South Carolina. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.
Do Nurses at Lake Moultrie Nursing Home Stick Around?
Staff at Lake Moultrie Nursing Home tend to stick around. With a turnover rate of 25%, the facility is 21 percentage points below the South Carolina average of 46%. Low turnover is a positive sign. It means caregivers have time to learn each resident's needs, medications, and personal preferences. Consistent staff also notice subtle changes in a resident's condition more quickly. Registered Nurse turnover is also low at 18%, meaning experienced RNs are available to handle complex medical needs.
Was Lake Moultrie Nursing Home Ever Fined?
Lake Moultrie Nursing Home has been fined $19,097 across 2 penalty actions. This is below the South Carolina average of $33,270. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Lake Moultrie Nursing Home on Any Federal Watch List?
Lake Moultrie Nursing Home is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.