Lila Doyle Post Acute
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Lila Doyle Post Acute in Seneca, South Carolina, has a Trust Grade of C+, indicating it is slightly above average but not exceptional. It ranks #43 out of 186 facilities in South Carolina, placing it in the top half, and is the best option in Oconee County. The facility is currently improving, having reduced its issues from seven in 2023 to none in 2025. Staffing is a concern with a turnover rate of 63%, which is significantly higher than the state average of 46%, and the facility has received $9,318 in fines, which is considered average for the area. However, there are notable weaknesses to consider. A critical incident involved a resident being sexually abused by a visitor, with staff failing to intervene promptly and adequately investigate the allegation. Another concern was that a resident was not treated with dignity while being assisted with eating. Overall, while there are strengths in quality measures, families should weigh the staffing challenges and serious incidents carefully when making their decision.
- Trust Score
- C+
- In South Carolina
- #43/186
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 63% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- $9,318 in fines. Lower than most South Carolina facilities. Relatively clean record.
- Skilled Nurses ○ Average
- Each resident gets 37 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for South Carolina. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
- Violations ○ Average
- 7 deficiencies on record. Average for a facility this size. Mostly minor or procedural issues.
The Good
-
5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
17pts above South Carolina avg (46%)
Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity
Below median ($33,413)
Minor penalties assessed
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
15 points above South Carolina average of 48%
The Ugly 7 deficiencies on record
Nov 2023
2 deficiencies
1 IJ
CRITICAL
(J)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Free from Abuse/Neglect
(Tag F0600)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
Based on interviews, record review, document review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident (R)2) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for abuse was not sexually abused by a visitor o...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Investigate Abuse
(Tag F0610)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on interviews, record review, document review, and policy review, the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation following an allegation of sexual abuse for 1 resident (Resident #2) of ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jul 2023
5 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to promote the dignit...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement the care plan for 1 (Resident (R)43) of 1 re...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident (R)135) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for nutr...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based upon observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident (R) 135) of 6 residents observed...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0883
(Tag F0883)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident (R)5) of 5 sampled r...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
- "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: 1 life-threatening violation(s). Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 7 deficiencies on record, including 1 critical (life-threatening) violation. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
- • 63% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
About This Facility
What is Lila Doyle Post Acute's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns Lila Doyle Post Acute an overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars, which is considered above average nationally. Within South Carolina, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Lila Doyle Post Acute Staffed?
CMS rates Lila Doyle Post Acute's staffing level at 3 out of 5 stars, which is average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 63%, which is 17 percentage points above the South Carolina average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs.
What Have Inspectors Found at Lila Doyle Post Acute?
State health inspectors documented 7 deficiencies at Lila Doyle Post Acute during 2023. These included: 1 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death) and 6 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.
Who Owns and Operates Lila Doyle Post Acute?
Lila Doyle Post Acute is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by THE ENSIGN GROUP, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 120 certified beds and approximately 86 residents (about 72% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in Seneca, South Carolina.
How Does Lila Doyle Post Acute Compare to Other South Carolina Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in South Carolina, Lila Doyle Post Acute's overall rating (4 stars) is above the state average of 2.9, staff turnover (63%) is significantly higher than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (3 stars) is at the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Lila Doyle Post Acute?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations and the facility's high staff turnover rate.
Is Lila Doyle Post Acute Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, Lila Doyle Post Acute has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 1 Immediate Jeopardy citation (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 4-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in South Carolina. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.
Do Nurses at Lila Doyle Post Acute Stick Around?
Staff turnover at Lila Doyle Post Acute is high. At 63%, the facility is 17 percentage points above the South Carolina average of 46%. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?
Was Lila Doyle Post Acute Ever Fined?
Lila Doyle Post Acute has been fined $9,318 across 1 penalty action. This is below the South Carolina average of $33,172. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Lila Doyle Post Acute on Any Federal Watch List?
Lila Doyle Post Acute is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.