SERIOUS
(G)
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Free from Abuse/Neglect
(Tag F0600)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure physician services to provide order...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure physician services to provide orders for immediate care and needs for one (R)356 of three reviewed for injuries of unknown origin in a total sample of 35 residents, as evidenced by failing to assess and identify the cause of increased pain and swelling after an unwitnessed fall. R356 sustained an unwitnessed fall on 10/06/21 resulting in increasing pain and edema to the right leg and the facility medical director (R356's attending physician) failed to obtain an x-ray for six days after receiving negative doppler (ultrasonography used to evaluate the direction and pattern of blood flow) results ruling out a deep vein thrombosis (DVT; type of blood clot). The failure to ensure the resident received proper and adequate care resulted in harm.
Findings include:
Review of electronic medical record (EMR) revealed, under tab, Face Sheet, revealed R356 was admitted to facility on 07/10/19 with multiples diagnoses to included paraplegia and dementia.
Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 09/11/21 located in the EMR MDS tab revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of nine out of 15, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The assessment documented R356 required extensive assistance from two or more staff members for bed mobility and was totally dependent on staff for transfers, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene.
Review of the facility-provided document titled, Care Plan with a revision date of 10/06/21 revealed a Problem/Need of, At risk for injury/falls related to Dementia, L3 Spinal cord injury, paraplegia, vitamin D deficiency, psychotropic med [medication] use, bowel incontinence .incontinence of bladder .resident places self on floor and refuses to allow staff to assist him up. Throws his legs over side of bed . Approaches listed on the care plan included but were not limited to observe routinely, offer time out of bed, bed in low position, fall mat to bedside, monitor for behaviors including placing self on floor, ensure resident is positioned in middle of bed, offer snack, encourage to call for assistance, offer early morning get up, bed alarm, check placement and function of bed alarm every shift, keep personal items in reach, and offer weighted blanket.
Review of facility-provided paper document titled Departmental Notes, revealed a note dated 10/06/21 documented R356 sustained an unwitnessed fall and was assessed by the nurse. R356 was sitting on the floor with his back against the bed. When asked how he got on the floor he reported he wanted to get off the bed. Neurological assessments were initiated and within normal limits. The note documented, PROM [passive range of motion] completed to BLE [bilateral lower extremities] and no complaints of pain or deformities noted. Res [resident] able to move both arms WNL [within normal limits]. Resident offered to get in the chair but stated he wanted to go back to bed. MD [Medical Director (R356's attending physician)] notified. Weighted blanket applied.
The facility-provided paper document titled PHYSICIAN'S TELEPHONE ORDERS, dated 10/07/21, revealed Tramadol [narcotic analgesic] 50 mg po [by mouth] TID [three times a day] prn (pain) .venous us [ultrasound] RLE [right lower extremity] (rule out DVT) [deep vein thrombus] swelling.
Review of facility-provided paper document titled Departmental Notes, revealed a note dated 10/07/21 which documented R356's right leg was observed to be swollen. An order was received for a doppler to right leg and to begin tramadol (type of pain medication). The note documented tramadol was effective to control R356's pain.
Review of facility-provided paper document titled Departmental Notes, revealed a note dated 10/08/21 which documented a new order transport R356 to obtain the doppler due to the mobile radiology company not available at this time. A follow up note dated 10/08/21 revealed when transportation arrived to the facility the resident refused to go. The note stated, RN [Registered Nurse] was on floor and attempted to convince him, but he would not be swayed. RN and this nurse compared bilat [bilateral] lower legs; determined there was no color or size difference. No fever to Right lower leg [sic]. RN called Admin [facility administrator] and it was determined risk of xport [sic; transport] would outweigh benefit at this time . The original order for the mobile radiology group to come to facility and obtain ordered doppler was still scheduled. The physician was notified.
Review of facility-provided paper document titled Departmental Notes, revealed a note dated 10/12/21 revealed R356 reported his leg was extremely painful. The note also documented edema was noted from the knee up and his skin was described as shiny and tight from the ankle up .The resident did not eat his dinner, stated his stomach would not let him.
Review of the facility-provided document titled, DOPPLER REPORT dated 10/12/21 revealed, Conclusion: No evidence of right lower extremity deep venous thrombosis [DVT], and was electronically signed by the by the interpreting physician at 5:37 PM.
Review of facility-provided paper document titled Departmental Notes, revealed a note dated 10/13/21 which documented the physician was notified of the doppler results and no new orders were received.
Review of facility-provided paper document titled Departmental Notes, revealed a note dated 10/14/21 which documented R356 was displaying behaviors of attempting to hang his legs off the side of the bed, was yelling and screaming, refused to allow staff to complete a body audit, and staff were unsuccessful in repositioning him even after several attempts. The nurse notified the supervisor. The notes lacked evidence of any additional orders provided by the physician.
Review of facility-provided paper document titled Departmental Notes, revealed a note dated 10/15/21 which documented R356 had increased pain and edema to his right leg. The hospice Certified Nursing Aide (CNA) reported difficulty completing activities of daily living with the resident due to his pain. The resident did not eat the breakfast or lunch meal. A new order was received to change R356's pain medication. The note lacked evidence that R356 was assessed by the physician due to the increase pain and swelling and no evidence that any new diagnostic orders were received.
The facility-provided paper document titled NURSE'S MEDICATION NOTES, revealed PRN Tramadol was administered to R356 eight times from 10/07/21-10/15/21 with effective results.
Review of facility-provided paper document titled Departmental Notes, revealed a note dated 10/17/21 which documented R356 was making multiple attempts to throw his legs over the side of the bed. The note also documented his right leg edema continued and staff identified the right leg was warmer than the left with a reddened area. The note documented the physician was notified but lacked evidence that the physician completed an assessment or provided any new orders.
Review of facility-provided paper document titled Departmental Notes, revealed a note dated 10/18/21 at 12:00 PM which showed a new order to obtain a stat x-ray of R356's right leg was received due to right leg swelling. A note dated 10/18/21 at 2:00 PM documented R356 continued to complain of pain. A note dated 10/18/21 at 3:36 PM revealed the ordered x-ray was completed and were reviewed by the physician. The note documented new orders were received but did not indicate what the order stated. A note date 10/18/21 at 4:04 PM documented R356 was transported to the hospital. A note dated 10/18/21 at 8:47 PM documented, LE [late entry]: 4:15pm X-ray results of right pelvis and right femur received: Results of right pelvis: right hip degenerative changes. No acute osseous [bone] abnormality. Results right femur - acute distal femur fracture. MD notified. [sic]
The facility-provided paper document titled NURSE'S MEDICATION NOTES, revealed PRN Norco was administered to R356 six times from 10/15/21-10/18/21 with effective results.
During an interview that was conducted on 01/11/22 at 4:45 PM, DON (Director of Nursing) confirmed R356 sustained an unwitnessed fall on 10/06/21. She confirmed a doppler was obtained on 10/12/21 with negative results for a DVT, the resident continued to display pain and swelling, and an x-ray was not ordered until 10/18/21.
During an interview that was conducted on 01/12/22 at 10:25 AM, CNA15 reported she worked with R356 in October 2021. She recalled that his leg was swollen, he complained of pain, and he had a decline in his ability to assist with bed mobility prior to transferring to the hospital. CNA15 also recalled he was eating less during that time and nursing staff was aware of the edema in his leg.
An interview was conducted on 1/12/22 at 11:30 AM with a family member of R356's. They confirmed they were notified he had an unwitnessed fall in early October 2021 and that he passed away at the hospital shortly after going there stating, his organs shut down because of blood loss.
During an interview on 01/12/22 at 01:09 PM Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)7 reported staff were aware of R356's right leg edema that developed following his fall on 10/06/21. She confirmed the physician was made aware of the resident's increased pain and edema.
An interview was conducted on 01/12/22 at 1:48 PM, Unit Leader (UL)3 verified a diagnostic X-ray would be indicated for a resident with complaints of right leg pain and signs of swelling following an unwitnessed fall. UL3 confirmed diagnosis/treatment (x-ray) conducted/performed eleven days after a resident complained of pain and swelling following an unwitnessed fall would be considered a delay in diagnosis/treatment.
An interview was conducted on 01/12/22 at 2:40 PM with the Medical Director (R356's attending physician). The MD did not recall being notified by facility staff of R356's increased pain following the 10/06/21 unwitnessed fall and said she reviewed this case multiple times. The MD reported the facility's nursing documentation was inconsistent. The MD said the resident received a surgery that she would not have recommended which she felt lead to his decline. She said she had not expected the x-ray would reveal a fracture and felt it was possible the fracture was caused by one of his numerous previous falls or possibly a hairline fracture worsened over time.
During a follow-up interview on 01/12/22 at 3:47 PM the MD confirmed a doppler of the right leg was completed on 10/12/21, showed negative results, and the x-ray was not ordered until 10/18/21. The MD reported that she assessed R356 on the unit but did not complete a progress note every time. She said she was never given the impression by the nursing staff that something was horribly wrong with the resident. She further stated that when she looked at the whole scenario, she suspected that R356 had a hairline fracture that may not have been seen on a previous x-ray and that the edema she saw during this timeframe was not impressively different. When asked why there was a delay in ordering an x-ray after receiving the negative doppler results she said, You treat the symptoms. She further explained that R356's edema continued so that is why she ordered the x-ray, however, a DVT could be caused by a broken bone and immobility. The MD felt R356 sustained a more significant fall on 09/28/21 for which an x-ray was completed of his knee and showed no fracture. She went on to say that she was not informed R356 was having extreme pain because if she were, she would have examined him. The MD felt one could speculate about the cause of the fracture, but she could not know for sure. She said for someone to break the strongest bone in the body it would have to be some sort of fall and she believed the more likely cause of the fracture was his history of multiple falls.
A phone interview was conducted on 01/13/22 at 10:57 AM with the MD. She reported she ordered the doppler on 10/07/21 because R356's leg was edematous and wanted to rule out a DVT. The MD confirmed the doppler was negative for a DVT and the resident still had swelling. She explained there was no underlying cause for the swelling but that swelling can be caused by soft tissue injuries as well. The MD said she got an x-ray of his knee after he fell on [DATE], which did show the top of the femur without any fracture.
Copies of any physician progress notes for the month of October 2021 were requested from the physician during the 01/12/22 at 3:47 PM interview, however none were provided by the end of the survey.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on review of facility policy, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one resident (R) 155 was treate...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on review of facility policy, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure one resident (R) 155 was treated with respect and dignity by facility staff.
Findings include:
Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse dated 11/2019 indicated, .each resident has the right to be free from abuse .abuse is defined as the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish. Willful: the individual must have acted deliberately, not that the individual must have intended to inflict injury or harm. The policy defined physical abuse as, includes but is not limited to: hitting, slapping, pinching, and kicking. The definition of verbal abuse included, the use of oral, written or gestured language that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms to residents or their families or within their hearing distance, regardless of their age, ability to comprehend or disability.
The Summary Report of Facility Investigation from the 12/20/21 Five Day Follow Up DHEC Report noted the Director of Nursing (DON) received a report from a Certified Nurse Aide (CNA)22 that alleged CNA21 used profanity in front of R155. R155 reported he was upset, cursed at CNA21, and she cursed back at him. CNA21 denied swearing at R155 but did admit to refusing to change his shirt when asked.
The facility provided a folder containing their investigation which included an Investigative Statement/Interview from CNA22 dated 12/20/21. Review of the interview with CNA22, who reported the abuse, indicated the following regarding CNA21 and R155: CNA21 requested assistance with providing care for R155, because he was complaining about 1st shift not changing him. When we went into the room, resident was agitated that he was not changed earlier. I usually let the resident vent and then change them. [CNA21] came in and pointed her finger in his face and said, I'm your tech note [sic] her. Then stated that I'm picking and like to pick with the resident while they are mad. [CNA21] said three times, do you want to sit in your shit. I don't think the resident understood what she was saying. Then she said do you want to sit in your BM [bowel movement]. The resident balled up his fist at [CNA21] and then [CNA21] balled her fist and put it in his face. I got between them and told her to be quiet. She continued to instigate the resident. She said I'm not going to hit him; I am just picking. At one time, [CNA21] shoved him on his arm. I was on the other side of the bed and caught him. [While assisting to change the resident following an episode of incontinence] She was digging in his butt and he told her that is was hurting him. Resident told her you are being a bitch. [CNA21] said no you are being a bitch. After we finished changing the resident, he asked to have his shirt changed. [CNA21] said no I'm not going to change or do anything else for you. CNA22 found another staff member and they assisted R155 to change his shirt. CNA22 then reported the incident to a charge nurse. A staff member then approached her and asked questions about what had occurred. CNA22 also reported that the resident told CNA21 if I had legs, I would kick your ass. She said, haha I have legs and you don't. [sic]
Review of an Investigative Statement/Interview included in the facility-provided investigation folder, taken by Unit Lead (UL) 2 on 12/20/21 after the alleged incident indicated R155 said CNA21, told him she didn't want to hear that shit. When asked what else CNA21 said R155 said, never mind.
Review of an interview, included in the facility's investigation, with R155 conducted by the DON on 12/20/21 indicated R155 said, the tech that looks like [NAME] Mouse came in here and got into my face. We had words .I think she called me a dumb ass, but I don't remember .Yes, she changed my brief. At one time she was rubbing so hard that it hurt. I told her that it hurt. The DON asked R155 if CNA21 stopped rubbing him when he said it hurt and he could not remember.
Review of R155's undated Face Sheet found in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Face Sheet tab, revealed R155 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including double amputation below the knee, chronic pain, major depressive disorder, Type 2 diabetes, dementia without behaviors, and anxiety disorder.
Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/25/21 indicated a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 out of 15 which meant R155 had moderate cognitive impairment. The assessment documented R155 required extensive physical assistance from one staff member for bed mobility, dressing, and personal hygiene, and R155 was totally dependent on staff assistance for transfers and toilet use. The MDS also documented R155 had no behaviors.
Review of R155's Care Plan dated 09/30/21 located in the EMR under the Care Plan tab indicated he had numerous mood and behavior problems (i.e. verbal abuse, combativeness, anxiety, cursing etc.) secondary to Dementia. R155's interventions included, but were not limited to, approach resident in calm, reassuring manner. Observe for episode of inappropriate behavior and redirect .Provide for safety of resident and those near resident during periods of combativeness. Additionally, R155's care plan dated 07/13/21 indicated he was non-factual in relating happenings and situations between self and other residents/staff and conversations. Interventions included, assure resident of staff concern .encourage resident to be factual when relating situations and redirect resident when not.
During an interview on 01/10/22 at 2:47 PM, R155 said he recalled an incident with a female CNA and thought she cussed at him but could not recall the words. He said he told UL2 about the incident and she, straightened it all out. He said he had not seen the CNA since he talked to UL2. R155 could not recall the CNA's name and had not seen her since. He said he felt safe in the facility and was not concerned about anyone hurting him.
During an interview on 01/11/22 at 3:03 PM, UL2 said CNA22 reported to her that CNA21 had cursed at R155. UL2 said she spoke with the resident, and he did not go into many details but said CNA21 cursed. UL2 said R155 did not mention any physical abuse. UL2 said she was unaware of any issues between CNA21 and CNA22. UL2 also said she had no complaints regarding the accused, CNA21, in the past. UL2 said R155 did have confusion and his reports could be misleading at times. UL2 said it was CNA22 who initially reported the abuse, not the resident.
During an interview on 01/11/22 at 3:10 PM, the DON said she was notified by UL2 that CNA21 was rough with R155 and said some curse words in front of him. The DON said CNA21 was suspended pending the investigation and then terminated for her unprofessional conduct. The DON said when she interviewed R155 he could not remember exactly what happened. She said CNA21 and CNA22 gave different accounts of the incident. The DON acknowledged R155 told two staff on separate occasions that CNA21 used curse words at him or in front of him. The DON also confirmed R155 said CNA21 hurt him while rubbing too hard during incontinence care. She said she felt it was one CNA's word versus the other. The DON said because there were variations in R155's account of the incident, as well as the involved CNAs, she was unable to prove the abuse occurred as reported, but the end result was to terminate CNA21 to protect the residents. The DON acknowledged it was not R155 who made the allegation of abuse against CNA21.
During an interview on 01/12/22 at 10:28 AM, the Administrator said CNA22 was an agency staff who made an allegation of abuse against CNA21 regarding R155. She said R155 was not a good historian and often confabulates stories. The Administrator said from what she understood of the investigation, R155 could not remember the accused CNA swearing at him. The Administrator said CNA21 admitted to behaving unprofessionally so they terminated her. She said the facility did not terminate CNA21 for abuse because of varying stories from the staff and resident made it difficult to determine what actually occurred. The Administrator said R155 did not have a history of making false accusations of abuse and she confirmed it was not R155 who made this allegation against CNA21. Although the Administrator acknowledged R155's two different statements regarding CNA21 cursing at him and one statement regarding hurting him during incontinence care, she said R155 did not convince me it happened exactly the way it was reported. The Administrator said there was no indication of any issues between the two CNAs that would cause one to make a false accusation against the other. The Administrator said regardless of whether abuse was substantiated or not, the outcome was the same, CNA21 was terminated.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0658
(Tag F0658)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to accurately transcribe a physician telephone order regarding a medication for one Resident (R)25 of ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to accurately transcribe a physician telephone order regarding a medication for one Resident (R)25 of eight residents observed during medication administration. The sample included 35 residents.
Findings include:
Review of the Pharmacy Policy and Procedure Manual - Pharmacy Services, with an effective date of 07/01/2017, revealed new orders may be received verbally by the nurse on duty for transcription. If verbally received, the nurse writes down the complete order and then reads the information back to the prescriber for confirmation. The order is transcribed onto the Resident's Medication Administration Record (MAR) by the nurse.
Observation of medication administration on Hallway D with Registered Nurse (RN)6, on 01/12/22 at 7:50 AM, revealed the Medication Administration Record (MAR) of R25, located in a binder on top of the medication cart, contained an order for Augmentin (type of antibiotic medication) that failed to include the dosage of the medication. RN6 confirmed this information was missing. RN6 reported medication orders should be accurately transcribed from the physician's medication order to the MAR to include the name of the medication, the dosage, the route, and administration time.
Record review of R25's paper chart located in the chart room on the D Hallway revealed a physician's telephone order behind the physicians order tab dated 01/11/22 for Augmentin 875 milligrams (mg) one tablet by mouth (po) twice daily (BID) for five days for the diagnosis of urinary tract infection (UTI).
During an interview on 01/12/22 at 2:15 PM, RN5 stated a medication order should be transcribed to the MAR exactly as written by the physician, and it should include the name of the medication, the dosage of the medication, route, administration time/frequency of administration, and number of days the medication should be administered.
An interview with the Unit Leader (UL)3 of the D Hallway on 01/12/22 at 10:00 AM revealed it was her expectation that nursing staff accurately transcribe all physician medication orders to the MAR to include the name of the medication, the dosage, route, and timing of the administration of the medication. UL3 continued to relate all the orders were double checked by the nurse on the evening shift. UL3 confirmed the order for R25's Augmentin was not accurately transcribed on the MAR.
An interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 01/12/22 at 2:21 PM revealed it was her expectation that nursing staff accurately transcribe all physician orders, especially medication orders, to include the name of the medication, the dosage, and the route of the medication. The DON related it was her understanding each unit had a backup system where the evening nurse checked all the new orders written on the day shift to ensure accuracy. The DON confirmed the evening nurse did not identify the medication transcription error on R25's MAR.
An interview with the Administrator on 01/12/22 at 4:23 PM revealed it was her expectation that nursing staff follow the expected guidelines regarding the transcription of medication orders. She continued to relate that the facility had built in checks and balances in the system to catch medication transcription errors. The administrator confirmed the order for R25's antibiotic failed to include the dosage when transcribed to the MAR.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0685
(Tag F0685)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents receive assistance with hearing aids to maintain hearing abilities for one (Resident...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents receive assistance with hearing aids to maintain hearing abilities for one (Resident (R)70) of three reviewed for communication/sensory in a total sample of 35 residents.
Findings include:
Review of the facility policy titled, Hearing Aid, with a revision date of October 2012, revealed, A resident requiring a hearing aid will be assisted in the placement, maintenance, care and storage of the hearing aid .Purpose: To maintain the resident's hearing and enhance the quality of life .Procedure: Placement: 1. Check the battery .
During an interview on 01/11/22, at 10:10 AM, R70 revealed a concern regarding the care and maintenance of his hearing aid equipment. The interview was challenging to conduct due to the resident not being able to hear accurately with out the use of hearing aids. The resident related the batteries had not been working for several weeks and the resident had asked the staff for assistance and new hearing aid batteries, however the resident had not received new batteries. The resident stated being without the use of hearing aids for several weeks had affected the ability to communicate and interact with family, peers, and staff at the facility.
Review of R70's Face Sheet located in the paper chart kept in the chart room on the D Hallway revealed an admission date of 11/25/20.
Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/13/21 revealed R70 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, indicating intact cognition. The assessment also documented R70 had minimal hearing difficulties with the use of hearing aids.
An interview conducted with Registered Nurse (RN)5 on 01/12/22 at 2:15 PM revealed the facility did take care of R70's hearing aids and the batteries should have been checked and replaced.
An interview conducted with Unit Leader (UL)3 on 01/10/22 at 10:30 AM, revealed it was the policy of the facility to assist the resident with the care of their hearing aids.
An interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 01/12/22 at 2:21 PM revealed it was her expectation that all the nursing staff follow the Hearing Aid policy and assist the residents with the care of their hearing aids.
An interview with the Administrator on 01/12/22 at 4:23 PM revealed that it was her expectation that the facility followed their policy regarding the care of the resident hearing aids. She reported she was aware of the importance of properly functioning hearing aids to improve the quality of life for the residents.
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0804
(Tag F0804)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, observation, interview, and review of Resident Council Minutes the facility failed to provide meals of a...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, observation, interview, and review of Resident Council Minutes the facility failed to provide meals of an appetizing temperature for the residents receiving room trays on three of four units per complaints received through resident council and five of five (Resident (R)6, R155, R35, R110, R147) reviewed for food in a total sample of 35 residents.
Findings include:
1. Review of Resident Council minutes dated 10/12/21 revealed in part, Residents asked if both food tray carts must be on the unit before trays can be distributed? Council members suggest that trays be distributed from the first cart to arrive while the kitchen is finishing up trays on the second cart. This way, food trays would be served sooner as they leave the kitchen. Right now, residents report that staff wait until both carts are on the unit and then begin passing all the trays. Council advised the matter would be discussed with the Dietary Manager and the unit nursing managers for follow up. The form lacked documentation of a response from facility staff related to the food concerns voiced by the residents.
2. Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) under the face sheet tab revealed R35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Parkinson's Disease.
Review of phys [physician] order tab of the EMR revealed an order dated 07/18/19 showing R35 received a regular diet, utilized built-up utensils for meals, and directed staff to avoid providing R35 with rice and peanuts.
Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 10/23/21 revealed R35 required setup help only for meals. The MDS further revealed resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating resident was cognitively intact.
During an interview with R35 on 01/11/22 at 10:16 AM revealed R35 was the President of Resident Council. R35 reported one of the major complaints during Resident Council meetings was half the time they serve food, the food is cold, especially when you're eating in your room .staff tell Resident Council that they are addressing issues, but nothing ever changes .major complaint is food, either too soft or too cold.
3. Review of the EMR under the Face Sheet tab revealed R6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of traumatic brain injury, drug induced psychosis secondary to parkinsonism, Parkinson's disease, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and major depressive disorder.
Review of R6's EMR under the Physician's Orders tab indicated an order for regular diet dated 06/25/19.
Review of R6's quarterly MDS with an ARD of 10/09/21 indicated the resident was cognitively intact as evidenced by a BIMS score of 15 out of 15.
During an interview on 01/11/22 at 9:22 AM, R6 stated by the time his food tray was delivered to his room the food was cold. R6 said that he must go to the dining room to eat if he wanted hot food. R6 stated when the facility delivered meals in Styrofoam food containers they placed a clear plastic top over the container, but the food still arrived cold. R6 said the blue plate covers currently used by the facility did not keep the food warm. R6 stated being served cold food had been occurring for years and it was not something that started due to issues related to the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic. R6 confirmed he had brought this issue to the attention of facility management.
4. Review of the EMR face sheet tab revealed R110 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].
Review of diet order in the EMR, under phys order tab, revealed R110 had an order for regular diet with allergy to oysters and clams.
Review of quarterly MDS with ARD date 12/04/21, revealed R110 was able to eat independently with no help or staff oversight required. The MDS further revealed resident had a BIMS score of 15 indicating resident was cognitively intact.
During an interview on 01/10/22 at approximately 10:00 AM, R110 reported, food is terrible .for the past one to two years unfit for human consumption .poor quality, getting second and third cuts on meats .frequently undercooked and breakfast served room temperature.
5. Review of R147's EMR under the Dx [diagnosis] tab indicated he was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including hemiplegia and stage 4 kidney disease.
Review of R147's quarterly MDS with an ARD of 12/25/21 revealed R147 had a BIMS score of seven out of 15, which indicated severe cognitive impairment.
During an interview on 01/10/22 at 10:48 AM R147 said the food served at the facility did not taste very good. He also said it was not served hot and was rarely served warm. R147 said he ate his meals in his room.
6. Review of R155's EMR under the Dx [diagnosis] tab indicated he was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including type II diabetes and double below the knee amputations.
Review of R155's quarterly MDS with an ARD of 12/25/21 revealed R155 had a BIMS score of 10 out of 15, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment.
During an interview on 01/10/22 at 2:51 PM R155 said, the food is horrible, and the food temperature is always cold. R155 said the meal trays on B hall were always cold and not on time.
7. Observation of meal service temping of the steam table completed by Dietary Staff 24 in the kitchen on 01/11/22 at 5:00 PM revealed results were as follows:
beef hamburger patty equaled (=)178 degrees Fahrenheit;
tater tots = 145 degrees Fahrenheit;
vegetables = 174 degrees Fahrenheit;
mechanical chopped beef = 168 degrees Fahrenheit;
pureed meat = 184 degrees Fahrenheit;
pureed potatoes = 168 degrees Fahrenheit;
pureed vegetables = 167 degrees Fahrenheit;
alternative starch, rice = 167 degrees Fahrenheit;
alternative vegetable, carrots = 173 degrees Fahrenheit;
alternative meat, chicken = 143 degrees Fahrenheit; and
gravy = 160 degrees Fahrenheit.
The number of kitchen staff working on the dinner food line were: four employees on the tray line and two employees serving. The blue plate holders (top and bottom covers for each plate) were being used but were not being heated. Carafes of coffee and pitchers of tea were placed on top of the carts for delivery. Test trays for A, B and D Halls were requested.
During an observation on 01/11/22 at 5:35 PM a tray cart came on Hall A and two Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) began passing trays to resident rooms. At 6:35 PM the trays were passed to all the residents and Unit Clerk (UC) 1 brought a test tray to the nurses' station. The test tray consisted of a burger patty with cheese served on white bread, a mixture of bell peppers and onions and tater tots. The food items were tasted by UC1, and she said the burger was lukewarm and could be warmer. She also said the peppers and onions were too cool and the tater tots were too hard. This tray was also tested by a surveyor who confirmed UC1's conclusion that the burger patty, onion and peppers, and tater tots were not at an appetizing temperature.
Observation on 01/11/22 at 5:35 PM, revealed meal trays started being served to Hall B at by CNA19 and CNA16. The last tray on the cart was provided to the surveyor as a test tray, at approximately 6:25 PM. The test tray included two slices of bread with a hamburger patty, one slice of cheese, green pepper and onion mixture, tater tots, and bowl of pears on the side. The hamburger, cheese, and bread were cool to the touch; the green peppers and onion mixture was lukewarm and overcooked; and the tater tots were hard and room temperature. Registered Nurse (RN)20 was present at 6:25 PM and confirmed the bread, meat and cheese were served cool to touch, vegetable was lukewarm and overcooked, tater tots were room temperature and hard.
Observation on 01/11/22 at 5:55 PM in the kitchen revealed the first insulated food cart for the Hall D was loaded by 5:55 PM and the second cart by 6:02 PM, with both carts arriving to the Hall at 6:04 PM. Observation on Hall D at 6:05 PM revealed two CNAs began delivering trays and were then assisted by two nurses. The last tray was delivered at 6:25 PM. Immediately following the last resident tray being delivered, a test tray from the cart was carried to the nurses' station (located in the center of Hall D) and the temperatures of the food items were taken. Temperature results were as follows:
Beef hamburger patty = 128 degrees Fahrenheit;
tater tots = 99 degrees Fahrenheit; and
vegetables = 107 degrees Fahrenheit. The food items were then tasted by a surveyor, which revealed the hamburger patty was warm, the vegetables were cool, and the tater tots were cold.
An interview was conducted during dinner service on 01/12/22 at 5:50 PM with the Director of Dietary. When asked why the blue plate holders were not being heated, the DD stated the heating element stopped working on 01/10/22 (Monday) and she submitted a work order to have it repaired on the same day. The DD provided one of the China plates off the line so the surveyor could feel that it was warm to the touch. The DD stated serving a patty melt sandwich for this meal slowed down the meal service process due to there being a couple of extra steps to plate each sandwich. The DD explained on 12/10/21 the facility management made the decision all meals would be served on China plates only (no Styrofoam containers except for the COVID-19 hall) in an attempt for the meals to be warmer by the time they reach the residents. The DD confirmed the kitchen staff delivered the food carts to the resident halls but did not assist with tray delivery.
During an interview on 1/13/22 at 10:45 AM with the Administrator, she stated she was aware of residents' complaints of the food being cold by the time it reached their rooms. The Administrator stated due to COVID-19 infection control issues there were periods of time when meals were delivered in Styrofoam containers which made it difficult to keep the food hot. The Administrator stated another issue that forced the use of Styrofoam containers, was the dish machine began working intermittently during August of 2020. The Administrator said after much back and forth between several agencies and numerous repairs the dish machine was replaced during October 2020. The Administrator explained the facility had tried several solutions to resolve the cold meals issue: Encouraging residents to eat their meals in the small dining rooms on their hall (most residents refused), Changing the order meal trays were delivered in (those residents that need more assistance with eating versus those that are independent), Purchasing smaller meal delivery carts (found to be cost prohibitive), Using clear plastic covers over the Styrofoam containers (was not effective), and Re-opening the large dining room for communal dining (seating one resident per a four person table). The Administrator stated the cold meal issue had been addressed in Quality Assessment Performance Improvement (QAPI). The Administrator stated a company was at the facility this morning to repair the Temp-Rite (the machine that heats the blue plate holders) and the repair company determined several of the heating elements were not functioning.
During an interview on 01/13/22 at 12:05 PM with the Director of Nursing (DON), who is over the QAPI program, she stated the cold meal issue was not included in the current QAPI plan.
On 01/13/22 at 11:00 AM the Surveyor requested, from the Administrator, a facility policy regarding meal delivery/temperature, but one was not received prior to exit.
-
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to follow food safety requirements by not labeling and dating food items, keeping the refrigerator clean and removing i...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to follow food safety requirements by not labeling and dating food items, keeping the refrigerator clean and removing items from the refrigerator by their use by date. This practice had the possibility of negatively affecting all residents in the facility.
Findings include:
Review of the facility's policy titled, Food Storage dated 2006 stated, Policy: Sufficient storage facilities are provided to keep foods safe, wholesome and appetizing. Food is stored, prepared, and transported at an appropriate temperature and by methods designed to prevent contamination .14. All refrigerator units are kept clean .at all times. 15. Refrigeration: .e. All foods should be covered, labeled and dated .
During observation of the kitchen on 01/10/22 at 9:15 AM with the Director of Dietary (DD) present, revealed the walk-in cooler contained a rolling cart with 14 pitchers of tea which lacked a label and date. When the DD removed the rolling cart, a puddle of a reddish/pink tinted clear liquid was revealed on the floor under a storage rack full of paper boxes containing food. Upon further inspection, one of the boxes closest to the reddish/pink tinted clear liquid contained thawing turkeys. The DD confirmed there was a reddish/pinkish tinted clear liquid on the floor. The DD stated staff should have placed a pan under the turkeys to keep the juice contained. Continued observation of the kitchen with the DD present revealed the smaller walk-in cooler (cooler #3) contained seven pre-made sandwich halves wrapped in plastic wrap sitting in a black bin on a storage shelf. The sandwiches included three ham sandwiches with a use by date of 01/09/22 and four turkey sandwiches with a use by date of 01/04/22. The DD confirmed the sandwiches were out of date and removed them from the refrigerator. Also, on the storage shelf, was a Ziploc plastic bag dated 01/06/22, which contained half an egg salad sandwich wrapped in plastic wrap, two packaged snacks, and a bottled water. The DD stated the bag was used as a snack for residents going to dialysis and the bagged items (sandwich) had a three-day use period. The DD removed the Ziploc bag from the refrigerator.
During an interview on 01/12/22 at 10:45 AM with the DD, she stated her kitchen staff were aware of and had received education regarding labeling/dating of items in the refrigerator, removing out of date items from the refrigerator, and proper containment of juices of thawing meat.