BOWDLE NURSING HOME
Inspected within the last 6 months. Data reflects current conditions.
Bowdle Nursing Home in South Dakota has a Trust Grade of B, which indicates it is a solid choice and generally good quality. It ranks #39 out of 95 facilities in the state, placing it in the top half, and it is the only option in Edmunds County. The facility is improving, with the number of reported issues decreasing from three in 2024 to two in 2025. Staffing is a mixed bag; while turnover is relatively low at 35%, the facility has less RN coverage than 97% of state facilities, which raises concerns about oversight. Notably, there have been incidents of insufficient RN coverage for several days, and issues with cleaning protocols for a whirlpool tub and food storage practices, suggesting some areas need attention.
- Trust Score
- B
- In South Dakota
- #39/95
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- 35% turnover. Near South Dakota's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most South Dakota facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 24 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for South Dakota. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ✓ Good
- Only 5 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
The Good
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover below average (35%)
13 points below South Dakota average of 48%
Facility shows strength in fire safety.
The Bad
Near South Dakota average (2.7)
Meets federal standards, typical of most facilities
11pts below South Dakota avg (46%)
Typical for the industry
The Ugly 5 deficiencies on record
Jul 2025
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and policy reviews the provider failed to ensure:*One of one whirlpool tub had been disinfected...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0727
(Tag F0727)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on payroll-based journal (PBJ) day review and interview, the provider failed to ensure eight hours of registered nurse (RN) coverage seven days per week for two consecutive quarters during July,...
Read full inspector narrative →
Feb 2024
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pharmacy Services
(Tag F0755)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and policy review the provider failed to ensure they had followed their policy for counting controlled medications in one of one medication storage room waiting for de...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
2. Review of the provider's Cleaning of Oxygen Equipment Policy #2021-04 effective 4/2001 revealed:
*D. Oxygen cannula, mask and tubing
1. Change oxygen cannula and mask once a week. Discard the dirty...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and policy review provider failed to ensure their food storage policy had been maintained by dating open food packages in one of one kitchens. Findings include:
1. Ini...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most South Dakota facilities.
- • Only 5 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
- • 35% turnover. Below South Dakota's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
- • No major red flags. Standard due diligence and a personal visit recommended.
About This Facility
What is Bowdle's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns BOWDLE NURSING HOME an overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars, which is considered average nationally. Within South Dakota, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This mid-range rating indicates the facility meets federal standards but may have areas for improvement.
How is Bowdle Staffed?
CMS rates BOWDLE NURSING HOME's staffing level at 1 out of 5 stars, which is much below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 35%, compared to the South Dakota average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Bowdle?
State health inspectors documented 5 deficiencies at BOWDLE NURSING HOME during 2024 to 2025. These included: 5 with potential for harm.
Who Owns and Operates Bowdle?
BOWDLE NURSING HOME is owned by a government entity. Government-operated facilities are typically run by state, county, or municipal agencies. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 32 certified beds and approximately 20 residents (about 62% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in BOWDLE, South Dakota.
How Does Bowdle Compare to Other South Dakota Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in South Dakota, BOWDLE NURSING HOME's overall rating (3 stars) is above the state average of 2.7, staff turnover (35%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Bowdle?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the below-average staffing rating.
Is Bowdle Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, BOWDLE NURSING HOME has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 3-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in South Dakota. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Bowdle Stick Around?
BOWDLE NURSING HOME has a staff turnover rate of 35%, which is about average for South Dakota nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Bowdle Ever Fined?
BOWDLE NURSING HOME has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Bowdle on Any Federal Watch List?
BOWDLE NURSING HOME is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.