AVANTARA LAKE NORDEN
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Avantara Lake Norden has a Trust Grade of B+, which means it's recommended and above average in quality. It ranks #1 out of 95 nursing homes in South Dakota, indicating it is among the best options in the state, and #1 out of 2 in Hamlin County, meaning there is only one other local facility. The facility is improving, having reduced issues from 3 in 2023 to 1 in 2025. Staffing is rated average at 3 out of 5 stars, with a turnover rate of 52%, which is on par with the state average. However, the facility has incurred $10,647 in fines, which is typical compared to other facilities. They also have average RN coverage, which is concerning as RNs play a crucial role in patient care. Specific incidents noted include a failure to implement proper care to prevent a resident's pressure ulcer and inadequate infection control practices in shower rooms, which could lead to safety issues. Overall, while there are some strengths, families should be aware of these weaknesses as they consider this nursing home for their loved ones.
- Trust Score
- B+
- In South Dakota
- #1/95
- Safety Record
- Moderate
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 52% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- $10,647 in fines. Lower than most South Dakota facilities. Relatively clean record.
- Skilled Nurses ✓ Good
- Each resident gets 42 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than average for South Dakota. RNs are trained to catch health problems early.
- Violations ✓ Good
- Only 4 deficiencies on record. Cleaner than most facilities. Minor issues only.
The Good
-
4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
Near South Dakota avg (46%)
Higher turnover may affect care consistency
Below median ($33,413)
Minor penalties assessed
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 4 deficiencies on record
Mar 2025
1 deficiency
MINOR
(B)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Minor procedural issue · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the provider failed to ensure resident care plans were updated to accurately reflect the residents' abilities to use call lights effe...
Read full inspector narrative →
Nov 2023
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0658
(Tag F0658)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the provider failed to ensure a Foley catheter change was completed per a phy...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and policy review the provider failed to ensure necessary infection control practices in one of two shower rooms that included:
*Maintenance of a plastic three drawer ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jan 2023
1 deficiency
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Pressure Ulcer Prevention
(Tag F0686)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the provider failed to put appropriate interventions in place for one of two sampled resident (289) to prevent a pressure ulcer from ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Grade B+ (83/100). Above average facility, better than most options in South Dakota.
- • 4 deficiencies on record, including 1 serious (caused harm) violation. Ask about corrective actions taken.
- • $10,647 in fines. Above average for South Dakota. Some compliance problems on record.
About This Facility
What is Avantara Lake Norden's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns AVANTARA LAKE NORDEN an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within South Dakota, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Avantara Lake Norden Staffed?
CMS rates AVANTARA LAKE NORDEN's staffing level at 3 out of 5 stars, which is average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 52%, compared to the South Dakota average of 46%.
What Have Inspectors Found at Avantara Lake Norden?
State health inspectors documented 4 deficiencies at AVANTARA LAKE NORDEN during 2023 to 2025. These included: 1 that caused actual resident harm, 2 with potential for harm, and 1 minor or isolated issues. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.
Who Owns and Operates Avantara Lake Norden?
AVANTARA LAKE NORDEN is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by LEGACY HEALTHCARE, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 48 certified beds and approximately 46 residents (about 96% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in LAKE NORDEN, South Dakota.
How Does Avantara Lake Norden Compare to Other South Dakota Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in South Dakota, AVANTARA LAKE NORDEN's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 2.7, staff turnover (52%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (5 stars) is much above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Avantara Lake Norden?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is Avantara Lake Norden Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, AVANTARA LAKE NORDEN has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in South Dakota. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Avantara Lake Norden Stick Around?
AVANTARA LAKE NORDEN has a staff turnover rate of 52%, which is 6 percentage points above the South Dakota average of 46%. Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Avantara Lake Norden Ever Fined?
AVANTARA LAKE NORDEN has been fined $10,647 across 1 penalty action. This is below the South Dakota average of $33,185. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Avantara Lake Norden on Any Federal Watch List?
AVANTARA LAKE NORDEN is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.