ADAMSVILLE HEALTHCARE AND REHABILITATION CENTER
Inspected within the last 6 months. Data reflects current conditions.
Adamsville Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center has a Trust Grade of B, which indicates it is a good choice, solid but with room for improvement. It ranks #51 out of 298 facilities in Tennessee, placing it in the top half, and #2 out of 2 in McNairy County, meaning there is only one other local option available. The facility is showing an improving trend, with issues decreasing from four in 2021 to three in 2025. However, staffing is a mixed bag; while turnover is lower than average at 42%, it has a below-average staffing rating of 2 out of 5 stars, and there is less RN coverage than 86% of other facilities in Tennessee, which may impact resident care. Notably, there have been incidents of concern, including failures to ensure privacy during resident meetings and medication errors related to insulin administration, which can pose risks to residents' health. Overall, while Adamsville Healthcare has strengths in its rankings and a good trust grade, families should weigh these against the staffing challenges and specific incidents noted in inspections.
- Trust Score
- B
- In Tennessee
- #51/298
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- 42% turnover. Near Tennessee's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Tennessee facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 23 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Tennessee. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 17 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover below average (42%)
6 points below Tennessee average of 48%
Facility shows strength in quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
Near Tennessee avg (46%)
Typical for the industry
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 17 deficiencies on record
Aug 2021
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0760
(Tag F0760)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on review of the Geriatric Medication Handbook, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors when 1 of ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure opened medications were properly labeled and dated, external and internal medications were not stored together, and medications were n...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was distributed and served in a sanitary manner when 1 of 11 staff members (Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #2 ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0921)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide and maintain a sanitary and comfortable environment as evidenced by strong malodorous odors on 1 of 5 halls (200 Hall...
Read full inspector narrative →
Oct 2019
13 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to maintain or enhance resident dignity and respect when 5 of 23 (Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1, #4, #6, #7, and #9) faci...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0577
(Tag F0577)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the survey results were readily accessible for all residents residing in the facility. The facility had a census of 98...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0658
(Tag F0658)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, 1 of 2 nurses (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) # 4) fa...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to follow the physician's orders for wound care ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0725
(Tag F0725)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on medical record review, review of the facility staffing schedules and interview, it was determined the facility failed t...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0757
(Tag F0757)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on review of the PHYSICIANS' DESK REFERENCE 69th EDITION, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Unnecessary Medications
(Tag F0759)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, review of the JoVE Science Education Database Nursing Skills. Preparing and Administering Intramuscular ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0760
(Tag F0760)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on review of the 2018 Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. manufacturer's information, policy review, medical record...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were properly stored when 1 of 9 (500 Lower Hall Medication Cart) medication storage areas was unlocked an...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared and served under sanitary conditions as evidenced by a dirty hand-washing sink in the Kitche...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medical Records
(Tag F0842)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual, policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure practices to prevent th...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0565
(Tag F0565)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide privacy during 1 of 1 meeting with active Resident Council members.
The findings include:
Observations in the Sunroom on 10/15/19 at ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Tennessee facilities.
- • 42% turnover. Below Tennessee's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
- • 17 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
About This Facility
What is Adamsville Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns ADAMSVILLE HEALTHCARE AND REHABILITATION CENTER an overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars, which is considered above average nationally. Within Tennessee, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Adamsville Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center Staffed?
CMS rates ADAMSVILLE HEALTHCARE AND REHABILITATION CENTER's staffing level at 2 out of 5 stars, which is below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 42%, compared to the Tennessee average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Adamsville Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center?
State health inspectors documented 17 deficiencies at ADAMSVILLE HEALTHCARE AND REHABILITATION CENTER during 2019 to 2021. These included: 17 with potential for harm.
Who Owns and Operates Adamsville Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center?
ADAMSVILLE HEALTHCARE AND REHABILITATION CENTER is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by AHAVA HEALTHCARE, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 125 certified beds and approximately 83 residents (about 66% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in ADAMSVILLE, Tennessee.
How Does Adamsville Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center Compare to Other Tennessee Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Tennessee, ADAMSVILLE HEALTHCARE AND REHABILITATION CENTER's overall rating (4 stars) is above the state average of 2.8, staff turnover (42%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Adamsville Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the below-average staffing rating.
Is Adamsville Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, ADAMSVILLE HEALTHCARE AND REHABILITATION CENTER has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 4-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Tennessee. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Adamsville Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center Stick Around?
ADAMSVILLE HEALTHCARE AND REHABILITATION CENTER has a staff turnover rate of 42%, which is about average for Tennessee nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Adamsville Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center Ever Fined?
ADAMSVILLE HEALTHCARE AND REHABILITATION CENTER has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Adamsville Healthcare And Rehabilitation Center on Any Federal Watch List?
ADAMSVILLE HEALTHCARE AND REHABILITATION CENTER is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.