COVINGTON POST ACUTE
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Covington Post Acute in Covington, Tennessee, has a Trust Grade of B, indicating it is a good choice among nursing homes. It ranks #115 out of 298 facilities in the state, placing it in the top half, and is the best option among the two facilities in Tipton County. The facility is improving, with reported issues decreasing from five in 2021 to three in 2024. Staffing is a concern, rated 2 out of 5 stars, but with a low turnover rate of 27%, which is significantly better than the state average of 48%. While there have been no fines, recent inspections revealed several issues, including staff failing to properly wear protective equipment when serving food, expired food items in the kitchen, and inadequate sanitation in resident bathrooms. Families should weigh these strengths and weaknesses when considering Covington Post Acute for their loved ones.
- Trust Score
- B
- In Tennessee
- #115/298
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ✓ Good
- 27% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 21 points below Tennessee's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Tennessee facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ○ Average
- Each resident gets 34 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for Tennessee. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
- Violations ○ Average
- 8 deficiencies on record. Average for a facility this size. Mostly minor or procedural issues.
The Good
-
4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Low Staff Turnover (27%) · Staff stability means consistent care
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover is low (27%)
21 points below Tennessee average of 48%
Facility shows strength in quality measures, staff retention, fire safety.
The Bad
Near Tennessee average (2.8)
Meets federal standards, typical of most facilities
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 8 deficiencies on record
Nov 2024
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure practices to prevent th...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on policy review, observation, kitchen sanitation logs, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, and served under sanitary conditions when opened, undated, and ex...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0921)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jul 2021
5 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to maintain or enhance resident dignity and respect when 1 of 14 staff members (Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #2) failed to ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0582
(Tag F0582)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on resident trust account procedure manual, medical record review, review of resident trust funds, and interview, the faci...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Amended 8/10/2021
Based on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure opened medications were properly labeled and dated, external and internal medications were not store...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the mandatory personnel attended the...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was stored and distributed in a manner to prevent the spread of infection when 3 of 14 staff members (Certified N...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Tennessee facilities.
- • 27% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 21 points below Tennessee's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
- • No major red flags. Standard due diligence and a personal visit recommended.
About This Facility
What is Covington Post Acute's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns COVINGTON POST ACUTE an overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars, which is considered average nationally. Within Tennessee, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This mid-range rating indicates the facility meets federal standards but may have areas for improvement.
How is Covington Post Acute Staffed?
CMS rates COVINGTON POST ACUTE's staffing level at 2 out of 5 stars, which is below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 27%, compared to the Tennessee average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Covington Post Acute?
State health inspectors documented 8 deficiencies at COVINGTON POST ACUTE during 2021 to 2024. These included: 8 with potential for harm.
Who Owns and Operates Covington Post Acute?
COVINGTON POST ACUTE is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by LINKS HEALTHCARE GROUP, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 98 certified beds and approximately 77 residents (about 79% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in COVINGTON, Tennessee.
How Does Covington Post Acute Compare to Other Tennessee Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Tennessee, COVINGTON POST ACUTE's overall rating (3 stars) is above the state average of 2.8, staff turnover (27%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (3 stars) is at the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Covington Post Acute?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the below-average staffing rating.
Is Covington Post Acute Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, COVINGTON POST ACUTE has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 3-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Tennessee. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Covington Post Acute Stick Around?
Staff at COVINGTON POST ACUTE tend to stick around. With a turnover rate of 27%, the facility is 19 percentage points below the Tennessee average of 46%. Low turnover is a positive sign. It means caregivers have time to learn each resident's needs, medications, and personal preferences. Consistent staff also notice subtle changes in a resident's condition more quickly.
Was Covington Post Acute Ever Fined?
COVINGTON POST ACUTE has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Covington Post Acute on Any Federal Watch List?
COVINGTON POST ACUTE is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.