GALLAWAY HEALTH AND REHAB

435 OLD BROWNSVILLE RD, GALLAWAY, TN 38036 (901) 867-8575
For profit - Limited Liability company 104 Beds MISSION HEALTH COMMUNITIES Data: November 2025 9 Immediate Jeopardy citations
Trust Grade
0/100
#247 of 298 in TN
Last Inspection: June 2022

Over 2 years since last inspection. Current conditions may differ from available data.

Overview

Gallaway Health and Rehab has received a Trust Grade of F, which indicates a poor rating with significant concerns about care. It ranks #247 out of 298 facilities in Tennessee, placing it in the bottom half, and is the second to last option in Fayette County, meaning there is only one facility locally that is better. While the facility is improving, with a decrease in issues from 16 in 2022 to just 2 in 2025, it still faces serious challenges, including $216,298 in fines, which is higher than 98% of facilities in the state. Staffing is below average with a 58% turnover rate, and although RN coverage is rated as average, staffing overall does not seem to provide the stability needed. Critical incidents included neglect where a resident experienced a significant weight loss due to delayed care for a damaged feeding tube, and another case where a resident was left unattended, leading to a violent altercation with another resident. These issues highlight the facility's serious deficiencies alongside some signs of improvement.

Trust Score
F
0/100
In Tennessee
#247/298
Bottom 18%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Getting Better
16 → 2 violations
Staff Stability
⚠ Watch
58% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
Penalties
○ Average
$216,298 in fines. Higher than 69% of Tennessee facilities. Some compliance issues.
Skilled Nurses
⚠ Watch
Each resident gets only 29 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Tennessee. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
Violations
⚠ Watch
30 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Overall Rating
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Staff Levels
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Care Quality
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2022: 16 issues
2025: 2 issues

The Good

  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in fire safety.

The Bad

1-Star Overall Rating

Below Tennessee average (2.8)

Significant quality concerns identified by CMS

Staff Turnover: 58%

12pts above Tennessee avg (46%)

Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity

Federal Fines: $216,298

Well above median ($33,413)

Significant penalties indicating serious issues

Chain: MISSION HEALTH COMMUNITIES

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

Staff turnover is elevated (58%)

10 points above Tennessee average of 48%

The Ugly 30 deficiencies on record

9 life-threatening
Aug 2025 2 deficiencies 1 IJ
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, medical record review, email correspondence review, observation, and interview, the facility fa...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, medical record review, email correspondence review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from neglect for 3 of 14 (Resident #6, Resident #1, and Resident #12) sampled residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. Resident #6, a vulnerable, cognitively impaired, totally dependent resident who required enteral feeding (method of delivering nutrition directly into the gastrointestinal tract) for nutrition was reviewed for neglect. On 3/20/2025, the nurse documented Resident #6 had a tear on the side of the feeding port of the percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube which caused leakage of the feeding onto the bed. Resident #6 did not receive a new PEG tube until 4/7/2025, 19 days after the tear was found, which allowed for leakage of the enteral nutrition for 19 days. Resident #6's weight was 137 pounds (lbs.) on 3/14/2025 and decreased to 117 lbs. on 4/3/2025. Resident #6 sustained a severe weight loss of 14.59 percent (%) in 20 days which delayed healing on her current Stage 3 pressure ulcer/injury (a deep wound that involves full-thickness tissue loss) on the Left Ischial Tuberosity (the bony prominence on the posterior bottom left part of the pelvis). Resident #6 was noted to have a new in-house acquired blister on 4/8/2025, on her right lower back. On 4/16/2025 a new Stage 2 pressure ulcer/injury (partial thickness skin loss involving the epidermis and or dermis) to her coccyx was identified. On 4/30/2025, a new Deep Tissue Injury (DTI) (a pressure-related injury to the soft tissue under the skin) on her left heel was identified. The Registered Dietician confirmed the tear in the feeding tube contributed to Resident #6's severe weight loss Resident #1, a vulnerable, cognitively impaired resident who required 2-person, mechanical lift assistance for transfers sustained a left, distal femur fracture (a break in the lower part of the left thigh bone, just above the knee joint) when staff transferred her without the use of the mechanical lift on 7/4/2025. Resident #1 had a prior improper transfer without the use of the mechanical lift which resulted in a toe fracture (broken bone). The Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) found Resident #1 sitting in her wheelchair screaming with excruciating pain on 7/4/2025 and attempted to stand Resident #1 up to transfer her to the bed without notifying the nurse for evaluation of Resident #1's pain, which resulted in increased pain. The CNA then picked Resident #1 up and placed her in bed, without the use of the 2-person mechanical lift. The nurse's assessment completed after Resident #1 was placed in the bed revealed bruising and swelling of her left knee. An X-Ray was obtained which revealed Resident #1 had a left distal femur fracture. The facility's failures resulted in Immediate jeopardy for Resident #1 and Resident #6. The facility also neglected to maintain and provide the ordered enteral feeding as scheduled for Resident #12's continuous enteral feed on 8/20/2025. Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) (a situation in which the provider's noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation has caused, or is likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to a resident) was identified related to the facility's failure to provide necessary goods and services to Resident #1 and Resident #6. The Administrator and the Director of Nursing (DON) were notified of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) of F-600 on 8/14/2025 at 10:53 AM. An amended template for F-600 was given to the Administrator and the DON on 8/20/2025 at 11:53 AM, in the Conference Room. The facility was cited at F-600 at a scope and severity of J, which constitutes Substandard Quality of Care. A partial extended survey was conducted from 8/20/2025 through 8/22/2025. An acceptable Removal Plan, which removes the immediacy of the Jeopardy for F-600 was received on 8/22/2025. The Removal Plan was validated onsite by the surveyor on 8/22/2025 through audit review, medical record review, observation, review of education records, and staff interviews. The IJ began on 3/20/2025 and was removed on 8/23/2025. The facility's noncompliance at F-600 continues at a scope and severity of D for monitoring of the effectiveness of the corrective actions. The facility is required to submit a Plan of Correction. The findings include: 1.Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse Prevention Program F600, dated 8/2024 revealed, .Residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect.resulting physical harm, pain.Abuse also includes the deprivation by an individual, including a caretaker, of goods and services that are necessary to attain or maintain, physical, mental or psychological well-being.Neglect means the failure of the facility, its employees or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish or emotional distress.The facility administration and employees are committed to protecting residents from abuse by anyone including, but not necessarily limited to.facility staff.Identification of occurrences and patterns of potential mistreatment/abuse.The reporting and filing of accurate documents relative to incidents of abuse.The implementation of changes to prevent future occurrences of abuse.The current .components of the CMS [Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services] directed Abuse Condition of Participation .Reporting to the state is per state guidelines. Review of the undated policy titled, KARDEX, revealed .the KARDEX is a vital section that outlines each resident's individualized daily care plan. It provides detailed instructions on various aspects of care, including the resident's daily activities.includes information on the resident's mobility.specific safety needs.and transfer methods.It notes whether the resident can ambulate independently. Review of the facility policy titled, Assessing Falls and Their Causes Guidelines, dated 10/2024, revealed, .The purposes of this procedure are to provide guidelines for assessing a resident after a fall and to assist staff in identifying causes of the fall.Residents must be assessed in a timely manner for potential causes of falls.Relevant environmental issues should be addressed promptly.If a resident has just fallen.nursing staff will record.and evaluate for possible injuries to the head, neck, spine, and extremities.nursing staff will provide appropriate first aid.Documentation will include any observed signs or symptoms of pain, swelling, bruising.An incident report must be completed for residents falls. The incident report form should be completed by the nursing supervisor on duty at the time.no later than 24 hours after the fall occurs. Review of the facility policy titled, .Abuse Prevention Program, Recognizing Signs and Symptoms of Abuse/Neglect (Identification), dated 10/2024, revealed .Neglect occurs when the facility is aware of, or should have been aware of goods and services that a resident (s) requires but the facility fails to provide them to the resident (s), resulting in, or may result in, physical harm, pain.Signs of / Actual Physical Neglect.unexplained weight loss.Possible signs/symptoms.Inconsistent injury explanation. Review of the facility policy titled, .Comprehensive Care Plans, dated 3/2025, revealed .An individualized comprehensive person centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and time frames to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental cultural and psychological needs is developed for each resident.The comprehensive care plan is based on a thorough assessment that includes, but is not limited to, the MDS and physicians [physician's] orders. Assessments of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the resident and the resident's condition change.Each resident's comprehensive care plan is designed to.Incorporate identified problem areas.The Care Planning/Interdisciplinary Team is responsible for the periodic review and updating of care plans.At least quarterly.The IDT [Interdisciplinary Team] will outline services in the comprehensive care plan that meet professional standards of quality or accepted standards of clinical practice. Review of the facility policy titled, Enteral Nutrition ., dated 5/2025, revealed .Adequate nutritional support through enteral feeding will be provided to residents as ordered.A dietitian will assess residents who are receiving enteral feedings, and will make appropriate recommendations for interventions to enhance tolerance and nutritional adequacy of enteral feedings and to prevent complications associated with enteral feedings and to prevent complications associated with enteral feedings.Enteral feeding orders will be written to ensure consistent volume infusion. The following information will be included to ensure that the full volume will be infused, regardless of any interruption of feeding.Rate of infusion.Total calories per day.Total daily volume to be infused (number of ml (milliliter) per day).Central supply or Food Service Manager will be responsible for ordering all tube feeding supplies. Review of the facility policy titled, Wound Care Guidelines, dated 6/2025, revealed .The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for the care of wounds and to promote healing. Review of the facility policy titled, Exercise of Rights/Resident Rights ., dated 11/2024, revealed .Our residents have the right to a dignified existence.access to persons and services inside and outside the facility.Our residents have equal access to quality care.Treated with dignity means the resident will be assisted in maintaining and enhancing his or her self-esteem and self-worth.Staff shall treat cognitively impaired residents with dignity and sensitivity. Review of the facility policy titled, Change in a Resident's Condition or Status ., dated 10/2024, revealed .The facility staff shall promptly notify the resident, his or her Attending Physician, and resident representative of changes in the resident's medical.condition and/or status.The Nurse Supervisor/Charge Nurse will notify the resident's Attending Physician or On-Call Physician.A need to alter the resident's medical treatment significantly.A need to transfer the resident to a hospital/treatment center.There is change in the resident's level of care status. Review of the facility policy titled, Pressure Injury/Skin Breakdown-Clinical Guidelines, dated 6/2025, revealed .The nursing staff will complete an evaluation of the skin.Based upon need and the results of the evaluations the staff will implement interventions for the prevention and care of skin issues.Nutritional supplementation should be based on realistic appraisal of need and identification of medical conditions and factors that affect.weight.and overall nutritional balance. Review of the facility policy titled, Quality of Life-Activities of Daily Living ., dated 4/2025, revealed .The community environment and staff behaviors are directed toward assisting the resident in maintaining and/or achieving independent functioning, dignity and well-being.Residents whom are unable to carry out activities of daily living receive the necessary care and services to maintain good nutrition.Residents are provided with appropriate care.Utilize ADL [activities of daily living] reports, paper or electronic to assess ADL decline.Update care plan appropriately and interventions as needed. Review of the facility policy titled, Accidents and Incidents - Investigating and Reporting ., dated 10/2024, revealed .All accidents or incidents involving residents, employees.The Nurse Supervisor/Charge Nurse and/or the department director or supervisor shall promptly initiate and document investigation of the accident or incident.The following data, as applicable, shall be included.nature of the injury.circumstances surrounding the accident or incident.condition of the injured person.disposition of the injured.Any corrective action taken.The Director of Nursing.shall review and complete.The Administrator shall review. 2. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #6 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses which included Encephalopathy, Aphasia, Dysphagia, and Cognitive Communication Deficit. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated 3/2025, revealed Resident #6 had scheduled continuous enteral feed for Jevity (calorically dense, fiber-fortified nutrition that provides balanced nutrition for long term tube feeding) 1.5 at 55 milliliter (ml)/Hour via (by way of) PEG tube. Resident #6's enteral feed order revealed to turn off the pump at 11:00 AM and turn the pump back on at 1:00 PM. Review of the Weights and Vitals Summary revealed Resident #6 weighed 137 lbs. on 3/14/2025. Review of the Progress Notes for Resident #6 dated 3/20/2025, revealed .Peg [PEG] tube.needs to be replaced due to tear on the side at the port. Tape use [used] to secure the spike [the end of the tubing connected to the residents PEG tube] into the port. Review of the Skin & (and) Wound Evaluation for Resident #6 dated 3/24/2025, revealed a Stage 2 pressure ulcer to the Resident's Left Ischial Tuberosity which measured 2.0 centimeter (cm) in Length (l) by 2.5 cm width (w) by 0 depth (d) which equaled a total area of 3.7 cm2 (centimeter squared a unit used in the measurement of area). Review of the Weights and Vitals Summary revealed Resident #6 weighed 117 lbs. on 4/3/2025. Review of the Progress Notes for Resident #6 dated 4/3/2025, revealed .NP [Nurse Practitioner] spoke with this residents' RP [Resident's Responsible Party] regarding weight loss and slow decline in status. Review of Hospital #3's After Visit Summary dated 4/7/2025 revealed Resident #3's Peg tube was replaced. Review of the significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #6 had poor short term and long-term memory. Resident #6 was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living. Resident #6 had an unplanned weight loss during the assessment reference period. Resident #6 received all nutrition through her PEG tube. Resident #6's pressure ulcer declined from Stage 2 to a Stage 3. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #6 was diagnosed with Abnormal Weight loss and Protein-Calorie Malnutrition on 4/8/2025. Review of the MAR dated 4/2025, revealed Resident #6 had scheduled continuous enteral feed for Jevity 1.5 at 55 ml/hour via PEG tube from 4/1/2025 through 4/8/2025. Resident #6's enteral feed was changed on 4/8/2025 to Jevity 1.5 at 65 ml/hour via PEG tube. Resident #6's enteral feed order revealed to turn off pump at 11:00 AM and turn pump back on at 1:00 PM Review of the NP Progress Notes dated 4/8/2025, revealed .Follow up.Prior unintended weight loss of 20lbs [20 lbs] .Patient [Resident #6] was found to have a dysfunctional PEG tube and it has since been replaced. She has also been moved to a room closure [closer] to nursing station for closer monitoring.Abnormal weight loss: PEG tube replaced. Will continue to monitor intake and feeding schedule . Review of the Skin & Wound Evaluation for Resident #6 dated 4/8/2025, revealed a new in-house pressure ulcer on her right lower back measuring 1.0 cm (l) by 1.5 cm (w). Review of the Nutrition Note dated 4/8/2025, revealed .A nutritional assessment was completed on this date for [Named Resident #6]. Resident's current weight.117.2 - 4/4/2025.Resident has had a weight change over the last 30 days. weight down 20# [20 lbs.] in 30 days, 14.5 % loss significant. Resident's current diet order .NPO [nothing by mouth] .Resident has stage II [2] pressure injury [ulcer] .per most recent skin report.Resident has skin concern(s) per most recent skin report.Enteral regimen has been unchanged since January and weight had been stable with gradual gain noted. Prostate [liquid protein].was added in March. Multiple pressure wounds noted, new area noted today. Labs reviewed.Peg tube was replaced 4/7 [4/7/2025] d/t [due to] split in tube.Rec [recommendation] to increase enteral [feeding] to Jevity 1.5 @ [at] 65ml/hr [hour] x [times] 22 hours. Review of the Skin & Wound Evaluation for Resident #6 dated 4/9/2025, revealed the pressure ulcer to the Left Ischial Tuberosity had progressed to a Stage 3 area. The Stage 3 pressure area had increased in size to 2.9 cm (l) by 3.2 cm (w) by 1.3 cm (d) which equaled a total area of 7.1 cm2. Review of the Skin & Wound Evaluation for Resident #6 dated 4/16/2025, revealed a new in- house acquired Stage 2 pressure ulcer on the coccyx that measured 2.9 cm(l) by 6.3 cm (w) by 0.1 cm (d) which equaled a total area of 13.1 cm2. Review of the Order Summary Report for Resident #6 revealed, .May substitute feeding formula as needed. Jevity 1.2 for 1.5.active.4/26/2025. Review of the Skin & Wound Evaluation for Resident #6 dated 4/30/2025, revealed a new in-house acquired Deep Tissue Injury (intact skin that is purple or maroon in color, with a blood-filled blister or other evidence of damage) on the left heel that measured 3.8 cm (l) by 2.5 cm (w) by 0 cm (d) which equaled a total area of 7.1 cm2. Review of an email sent by the Director of Nursing to the Director of Food Hospitality and Nutrition dated 7/17/2025, revealed .I have had a third feeding pump to malfunction. I notified the manufacturer a few months ago. I sent two back. The issues I have found have been inaccurate history recordings and not infusing properly. A return email from [Named Supply Company Representative] dated 7/30/2025, revealed, .I'm doing a day trip.tomorrow. I can be at your facility between 10-10:30 to dive into the pump issue. During an interview on 8/15/2025 at 11:45 AM, CNA U stated, .[Named Resident #6 ] is total assist with everything.she doesn't eat by mouth she has a feeding tube.she has had weight loss.the tube would not stay connected and the feeding would be all over the bed.they [nursing staff] tried to say the resident was doing it but I don't think she is capable of doing that.the tube had a split in it so there was no suction to it.I had brought it to the nurses attention that it was going all over the bed.I know it went on for over a month. Call placed to Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) V (nurse who noted the tear in the PEG on 3/20/2025) on 8/15/2025 at 11:54 AM, left message for a return call. LPN V did not return the call. During a telephone interview on 8/18/2025 at 12:09 PM, Wound Care Nurse #2 stated, .[Named Resident #6] had a stage one [pressure ulcer] on admission to her coccyx.she started losing weight because the feeding would not stay connected.feeding would be on the bed, I would have to find a CNA to help me clean her up when I went to do wound care.about a month before the facility sent her out to get the tube fixed.a PRN [as needed] nurse documented that the tube had a slit in it and the tube was being taped.the Unit Manager was made aware.losing weight developing more wounds.the family came up there [to the facility] often they were very unsatisfied with her care and talked to the DON. During a telephone interview on 8/18/2025 at 12:23 PM, the Registered Dietician (RD) stated, .she [Resident #6] had a significant weight loss on my 4/8/2025 [referring to her progress note] review.20 lbs. in 30 days.she had her PEG tube replaced.and her weight started going up.the PEG tube had a split in the tube.it is possible formula was leaking out.I seen the split noted in the nurse note for 3/20/2025, so the PEG tube needed replaced.PEG was replaced on 4/7/2025.I don't know why it took that long.since the tube was replaced, her weight has improved.I don't remember no [a] formal meeting about her weight loss .prior to the significant weight loss, her weight had been pretty stable without any significant loss.4/8 [4/8/2025] note I do note a pressure wound and on 3/14/2025, I added a protein supplement for her. During an interview on 8/18/2025 at 1:30 PM, LPN S stated, .[Named Resident #6] had a split in her peg tube .I don't recall why it wasn't changed sooner .I think once they found out they got it fixed . During a telephone interview on 8/18/2025 at 2:03 PM, CNA T stated, .she [Resident #6] had some weight loss, yes .we were out of Jevity 1.5 we were going all over the building trying to find some .they gave her Glucerna [nutritional supplement for diabetics] .the Unit Manager poured the Glucerna in the Jevity bottle .I don't know when her peg tube was taped up .her brother is the one that brought it to everyone's attention, he took pictures of it . During an interview on 8/18/2025 at 3:10 PM, the Unit Manager stated, .they [RD/NP] assumed the weight loss was from the feeding and they changed her [Resident #6] feeding .[Named LPN V] never told anybody about the tear in the PEG tube .she forgot to say anything .[Family Member (FM) W] found the hole in her tube and the tape wrapped around it .he showed me .we got her sent out to get it [tube] replaced that same day .the order is on 4/7/2025 to send her out, I thought we sent her out before then .the DON reviews the nurses notes .[Named LPN V] taped it [slit in tube] up .it was never reported to me .[FM W] said it was leaking and it did have tape on it .it did have a hole in it .the slit was actually in the tube .from what I saw .[LPN V] was only one reported .I don't know how long it had been that way .the DON was told she [Resident #6] does have a slit in it [tube] and it had been leaking . During a telephone interview on 8/18/2025 at 3:50 PM, NP #1 stated, .the PEG tube, the fluid wasn't running through it .wasn't getting her [Resident #6] nutrition .I do recall that .she had a couple of issues with her tubing .I don't remember exactly .that was contributing to the weight loss .the machine [feeding pump] was beeping a lot .I don't know how long that went on .I don't recall the nurse that told me about it .there were a lot of wounds .the enteral feed was noted on the bed . During an interview on 8/18/2025 on 4:08 PM, FM W stated, .in October 2024 she [Resident #6] had one bed sore on her bottom, the wound nurse then healed it up .she kept getting bed sores .I walked in and found the tube leaking, feeding all over the bed .the cover was brown .I found it [slit in tube] in April it was taped up all around .they moved her closer to the desk .the [Named DON & Administrator] put her on 1 on 1 for a month .during that time she didn't have a bed sore or anything .they were switching her feedings around and I could tell because the feeding would be a different color when I came in .During the interview FM W showed this surveyor a picture dated 4/7/2025 at 10:32 AM of Resident #6's PEG tube which revealed a hole in the connection at the end of her tube. During an interview on 8/18/2025, at 5:15 PM, the MDS Coordinator was asked why Resident #6 had a significant change assessment completed on 4/8/2025. The MDS Coordinator stated, .due to weight loss .the reason was unknown until they [facility] done [did] an investigation .monitored the [Named feeding pump] pumps and ordered new ones .we had faulty pumps .labs [laboratory values checked] were done to look for an underlying cause .sent her out to get a new [feeding] tube it was leaking .I am not sure when the leaking started .they were unsure about the weight loss but thought that may have had something to do with it .she had a stage 2 pressure ulcer that declined to a stage 3 pressure ulcer . During an interview on 8/18/2025, at 5:24 PM, the DON was asked if the damaged feeding tube contributed to Resident #6's weight loss. The DON stated, .4/3 [2025] the Restorative CNA weighed her and it [Resident #6's weight] was 117 lbs .she did look thinner, we reweighed her again the weight was the same .I had been auditing the pumps .Friday we have PAR [Patient at Risk] days .I would audit the pump .the first time I saw the split was on 4/3/2025 .the nurses never notified me the PEG was leaking .she is a nurse why didn't she notify the physician, no need to call me .new PEG tube on 4/7 [2025] . The DON was asked if she observed the split on 4/3/2025, why did it take until 4/7/2025 for Resident #6 to get a new PEG tube. The DON stated, .we got her out as soon as we could . The DON was asked if a resident's PEG tube should have a hole/tear in it. The DON stated, .Absolutely not, it was so minute .one CNA had said it was leaking .where you connect the tubing .nothing about it not flushing that I recall .I missed it in the notes .4/3 [2025] was when I first knew .I did not think it contributed to her weight loss .it could leak some of her nutrition out but it was so minute . The DON was asked if a different enteral formula was ever used for Resident #6. The DON stated, .the Unit Manager was on the floor late one afternoon and she poured Jevity 1.2 in it .I got on to her about it .I think we got a doctor order to substitute with the other Jevity .I done [did] an investigation about this .because it was a large weight loss .the nurse put in the notes about the slit in the tubing 3/20/2025 . The DON was asked if the family had ever called her about the feeding color looking different. The DON stated, .he called me at midnight .the feeding came in late that night .4/25 [2025] we replaced the pumps, 4 times I had voiced a complaint to the company about them .[Named LPN V] did not report it [slit in the tube] to the oncoming nurse [on 3/20/2025] .4/3/2025 is when we knew .I will have to look at that on why she didn't go out right then .we got right on it . Observation in Resident #6's room on 8/19/2025 at 8:20 AM, revealed the Resident's enteral feed bottle of Jevity 1.5 was completely empty and the enteral tubing line was clear without any feeding in the line. During an interview on 8/19/2025 at 8:30 AM, RN F stated, .I normally catch it [referring to the enteral feed for Resident #6] in time . During an interview on 8/21/2025 at 10:30 AM, CNA U stated, .her wounds were smaller, but they became larger when she was losing weight . During an interview on 8/21/2025 at 4:50 PM, Regional Director of Clinical Services #1 was asked if the facility had an Intake and Output (I & O) for Resident #6. She stated, I will look. Regional Director of Clinical Services #1 came back to the surveyor and stated, .We didn't have an I & O for [Named Resident #6] . During an interview on 8/27/2025 at 11:12 AM, the Unit Manager reviewed the picture FM W had provided. The Unit Manager stated, .that is not the area where I seen [saw] the tape .I seen the tape around the tubing, around another hole in the tubing below that area . During a telephone interview on 8/27/2025 at 2:22 PM, the Medical Director (MD) was asked what a nurse should do if a resident has a tear in their feeding tube. The MD stated, .report it to us, send [the resident] to the ER [Emergency Room] . The MD was asked if Resident #6's weight loss was discussed in the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) meeting. The MD stated, .Yes, yes, right and we changed the tube to solve the problem . 3. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis which included Major Depressive Disorder, Hypertension, Dysphagia, Abnormalities of gait and mobility, Psychosis, and other lack of coordination. Review of the Physical Therapy evaluation and Plan of Treatment for Resident #1 dated 5/1/2025 revealed impaired physical mobility and total dependence with transfers. Review of the Annual MDS dated [DATE], revealed Resident #1 had a BIMS score of 6, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Resident #1 was dependent on staff for toileting, bathing, lower body dressing, sit to stand, chair/bed-to chair transfer, and walking 10 feet was not attempted. Resident #1's MDS did not reflect the use of a mechanical lift. Resident #1 had impairment to one side of her lower extremity. Resident #1 had no falls since the prior assessment. Review of the care plan revealed, .Focus.[Named Resident #1] has an ADL Self Care Performance Deficit r/t [related to] Stroke and Hemiplegia.Revision on: 05/05/2025.Interventions.TRANSFER: [Named Resident #1] requires times 2-person total Mechanical.lift with medium sling for transfers. Date Initiated: 05/08/2014 Revision on: 05/13/2025. Review of the Incident Description for Resident #1 dated 7/4/2025, revealed .10:00 [AM].Nursing Description.bruise noted on l [left] knee, pt [patient] reported pain when positioned to perform peri [perineal] care.Injury Type.Abrasion.Injury Location.Left Knee (front). Review of the facility investigation revealed a written statement completed by RN F dated 7/4/2025, which stated, .CNAs asked me to look at patient [Named Resident #1]. I walked to her room and she was yelling Ow it hurts. Swelling of left knee, light bruise noted on assessment. Pt repositioned w/[with] pillows under knee. Call [Named on call company].Hospice, DON, Manager. Review of the Radiology Results Report for Resident #1 dated7/5/2025, revealed .KNEE 1 OR 2 VIEWS.Reason for Study.PAIN IN LEFT KNEE.FINDINGS: There is a moderately displaced fracture of the distal femoral metaphysis [portion of the thigh bone located just below the knee joint] with adjacent soft tissue swelling.There are moderate degenerative changes. Bones are osteopenic. CONCLUSION: Fracture of the distal femur. Review of the MAR for Resident #1 dated 7/2025, revealed Morphine Sulfate Oral Solution 10 milligram (mg)/ 5 ml (milliliter) with a start date of 7/5/2025. The nurse noted a pain level of 10 on 7/5/2025 (pain scale 1-10 with 10 being the highest level of pain). Review of the care plan revealed, .Focus.Potential for pain R/T fx [fracture] left femur.Place overbed table away from resident's leg. Put water on bed side table with in reach.Date Initiated: 07/05/2025. Review of the facility investigation completed by the Administrator dated 7/5/2025, revealed, .DESCRIPTION OF INCIDENT.[Named Resident #1] responds to name. Disoriented to time, place, and situation. Long and short term memory are impaired. Communicates with simple words.Does not speak much. Requires assistance of one person to shower, dress, and have personal hygiene needs met.Requires assistance of two people to transfer by mechanical lift now. She did transfer with one person assist as she was able to stand and pivot.12 falls since her admission in 2014.On 7/4/25 [2025] at 10:01 AM, resident c/o [complained of pain] when staff was changing brief. [Named RN F] was summoned to the room to assess resident.observed edema to left knee.called the NP to report findings. New orders given for ice and pain medication.notified [Hospice #1].Hospice nurse enroute to the facility to assess resident at 10:20 [AM] on 7/5/24 [2024]. The x-ray results were received and it indicated a fracture of the left distal femur.She has had several fractures in the past. Left femur fracture with repair, exact date unknown.Upon observation of [Resident #1] in the bed as she was positioned the day the pain began, I, [Named DON], observed the over bed table next to her bed. The left knee was on the side of the bed next to the over bed table. The corner of the table lined up with the bruise and abrasion on her left knee. If a staff member pushed the table over her unaware that they hit her knee, it would hit her knee and possible [possibly] cause a fracture of the left femu
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a person-cen...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a person-centered care plan for 1 of 3 (Resident #3) sampled residents reviewed. The findings include: 1.Review of the undated facility policy titled, KARDEX revealed, .the KARDEX is a vital section that outlines each resident's individualized daily care plan. It provides detailed instructions on various aspects of care, including the resident's daily activities.includes information on the resident's mobility.specific safety needs.and transfer methods.It notes whether the resident can ambulate independently. Review of the facility policy titled, F 656, F 657, F 658 Comprehensive Care Plans, with an effective date of 3/2025 revealed, .An individualized comprehensive person centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and time frames to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental cultural and psychological needs is developed for each resident. Assessments of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the resident and the resident's condition change.Each resident's comprehensive care plan is designed to.Incorporate identified problem areas.The IDT [Interdisciplinary Team] will outline services in the comprehensive care plan that meet professional standards of quality or accepted standards of clinical practice. Review of the facility policy titled, Safe Lifting and Movement of Residents, with an effective date of 10/2024 revealed, .to protect the safety and well-being of staff and residents, and to promote quality care, this facility uses appropriate techniques and devices to lift and move residents.Manual lifting of residents shall be eliminated when feasible.Staff will document resident transferring and lifting needs in the care plan.assessment shall include.Resident's mobility.Weight-bearing ability.Cognitive status. 2.Review of the medical record revealed Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD- group of lung diseases that make it difficult to breathe), Dementia, History of falling, Drug Induced Subacute Dyskinesia (disorder that causes involuntary movements), and Anxiety. Review of the Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #3 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 5, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Resident #3 was coded 1 dependent for all Functional Abilities which included eating, bathing, dressing, hygiene, and toileting. Resident #3 was dependent for all bed mobility and transfers. Review of the comprehensive care plan for Resident #3 dated 4/27/2025 revealed, .risk for falls r/t [related/to] confusion.Interventions.Anticipate and meet [Named Resident #3]'s needs.requires activities that minimize the potential for falls while providing diversion and distraction.Due to increased alertness staff to check resident at end of shift.Move all furniture out of room. Leave bed and mattress only.[Named Resident #3] has potential for respiratory complications r/t Emphysema [lung disease that damages the lungs and makes it difficult to breathe]/ COPD.Interventions.Head of bed to be elevated.or out of bed upright in a chair during episodes of difficulty breathing.Monitor/document for anxiety [worry, nervousness, restlessness, sleep disturbances].[Named Resident #3] has potential.impairment to skin integrity r/t fragile skin, constant movement while awake.Interventions.Use caution during transfers and bed mobility.[Named Resident #3] has potential for acute/chronic pain r/t impaired physical status.Interventions.Monitor for and report to charge nurse s/s of pain-facial grimacing, moaning, groaning, resistive to movement. Review of the Skin and Wound Evaluation for Resident #3 dated 5/5/2025 revealed, .Skin Condition.Redness.Sacrum blanchable redness sacral area.no other new skin issues noted. Review of the Incident Report for Resident #3 dated 5/6/2025 at 8:50 AM revealed, .Bruise.CNA [Certified Nursing Assistant-] entered the room to provide care.observed bruises on the resident.front left lateral [outside] medial [inside] leg.inner [inside] left lateral [outside] knee.front left lateral leg.front of left lateral knee.front of the left lower leg.front of the right knee.right shin.right outer elbow.right shoulder.right cheek.left chin.left side of neck.left shoulder.left upper arm.left inner elbow.resident sent to ED [Emergency Department] for evaluation.police presence.Predisposing Physiological [related to the mind] Factors.Impaired Memory.Incontinent.Agitated/Anxious.Confused.Decreased safety awareness.Delusions.Hallucinations.Impulsive.Involuntary Movements.Receives Antipsychotics [Seroquel-rare, very low probability meaning most people will not experience the side effect of increased bruising].Predisposing Situation Factors.A cna [CNA BB] new to [Named Facility] assigned to resident last night [5/5/2025 to 5/6/2025]. Review of a Progress Note for Resident #3 dated 5/6/2025 at 9:58 AM revealed, .Resident [Resident #3] noted to have discoloration to right side of her face.Nodule noted right side forehead with discoloration.Under left chin dark blackish looking discoloration quarter size.both shoulders notes to have purplish [purple] discoloration, both arms.several new areas of discoloration.both tops of hands with new areas of discoloration.legs with new areas of discoloration. Behind right ear small new area of discoloration.order to send resident to ER [Emergency Room]. Review of the Incident Report for Resident #3 dated 5/6/2025 at 12:00 PM revealed, .Fall: Known Cause.Incident Description. [CNA BB] assigned to resident last night 7pm 7am [5/5/2025 to 5/6/2025] reported.resident was on her floor mattress multiple times last night.resident was on the floor multiple times last night up against the night stand, with her legs under the bed, lying on her side with face on floor.Resident with multiple bruising to body.[CNA BB] said she placed resident on the mat and in the bed multiple times last night. Review of CNA BB‘s handwritten signed statement dated 5/6/2025 revealed, .The going [CNA] gave me a walk through.on who does what, Incontinent or not.showed me when [where] the linen and garbage was.I checked on her [Resident #3].changed her.left the room. Later I heard her Really loud so I went Back in the Room she was hanging on the side of the Bed So I sled [slid] her down on the mat BC [because] I couldn't continue to put her Back in the Bed.I know I went In there at least 7-8 time [times] due to her loudness I went I [in] there one time she was on her side by the dressers I place her Back on the mat.me lifting on her trying to get her Back on the mat all night long.All night she was hollering .constantly moving all over the room off the mat.she have a bruise by her foot Is due to her Being on the mat. During an interview on 8/25/2025 at 4:24 PM the Director of Nursing (DON) stated .[Named CNA] said she picked up [Named Resident #3] 6 or 7 times during the night [5/5/2025-5/6/2025].[CNA] said she picked [Resident #3] up by putting her arms under [Resident #3's] arms and put her back on the bed or mattress on the floor beside the bed.that is how she got the bruises to her shoulders. The rest of the bruising came from falling off the low bed and bumping into things in the room while crawling around. The DON was asked if there was furniture in Resident #3's room. The DON responded, Yes, a bed, a bedside table and an over the bed table. The DON was asked if Resident #3 required a two person assist with mechanical lift for transfers. The DON responded, Yes. The DON reviewed Resident #3's comprehensive care plan and confirmed Resident #3 was care planned for falls with interventions which included move all furniture out of room, leave mattress and bed only. The DON also confirmed Resident #3 should have been care planned for two-person with mechanical lift transfer assistance and was not. During a telephone interview on 8/27/2025 at 9:35 AM, CNA BB stated 5/5/2025 was her first shift on the Memory Care Unit and she had no orientation other than paperwork/computer lessons on the job since being hired. CNA BB stated she did not get report on the residents at shift change and she did not know how to access the resident's care plan on the computer. CNA BB stated Resident #3 had fallen off the bed on to a cushioned mat several times during the night and also crawled around in the floor. CNA BB was asked if Resident #3 required a two-person assisted mechanical lift for transfers. CNA BB replied, .I really don't know what she required, I was told it was normal to leave her on the mat all night. CNA BB confirmed she pulled Resident #3 up and put her back on the bed multiple times without assistance and without using a mechanical lift. CNA BB was asked if she had reported Resident #3's falls to Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Y. She replied, .No, I figured she knew because she was sitting in the hall outside of her [Resident #3's] room all night.I figured it was something she [Resident #3] do [does] all the time, since the nurse didn't say anything. During an interview on 8/27/2025 at 6:16 PM the MDS Coordinator stated per facility policy residents who cannot bear weight require a two person assist with a mechanical lift. The MDS Coordinator reviewed Resident #3's comprehensive care plan and confirmed a care plan was not developed and implemented for transfer assistance. The MDS Coordinator stated Resident #3 was unable to bear weight and should have had a care plan for transfers using 2 person assist with the use of a mechanical lift.
Dec 2022 10 deficiencies 8 IJ
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, job description review, facility investigation review, medical record review, observation, and interview...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, job description review, facility investigation review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to be free from abuse and neglect for 6 of 15 sampled residents (Resident #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, and #14) reviewed for abuse. The facility's failure to ensure a resident's right to be free from abuse and neglect resulted in Immediate Jeopardy when the facility failed to assess and provide timely treatment for an injury of unknown origin that resulted in a fracture for Resident #5; and a fall that resulted in a fracture for #14; and failed to prevent, identify, and monitor Resident #1 resulting in multiple resident-to-resident altercations with Resident #2 and #3. The facility's failure to provide supervision and ensure a safe environment resulted in Immediate Jeopardy for Resident #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, and #14. Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) is a situation in which the provider's noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation has caused, or is likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to a resident. The Interim Administrator and Interim Director of Nursing (IDON) were notified of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) for F-600 on 11/21/2022 at 5:43 PM, in the Conference Room. The Interim Administrator and Regional Vice-President were notified of the second Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) for F-600 on 12/7/2022 at 5:31 PM. The facility was cited Immediate Jeopardy at F-600. The facility was cited F-600 at a scope and a severity of J, which is Substandard Quality of Care. A partial extended survey was conducted from 12/12/2022 through 12/13/2022. The Immediate Jeopardy existed from 8/19/2022 through 12/13/2022. An acceptable Removal Plan, which removed the immediacy of the jeopardy, was received on 12/13/2021 at 8:42 AM, and was validated onsite by the surveyors on 12/14/2022 through review of root cause analysis, in-services, audits, and staff interviews conducted. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, .Abuse Investigations ., revealed .Reports of resident abuse, neglect, and injuries of unknown source shall be promptly and thoroughly investigated by facility management. Should an incident or suspected incident of resident abuse .neglect or injury of unknown source be reported, the Administrator, or his/her designee will appoint a member of management to investigate the alleged incident .The individual conducting the investigation will, at a minimum .Review the completed documentation forms .Interview the person(s) reporting incident; Interview any witnesses to the incident; Interview the resident (as medically appropriate) .Interview the resident's roommate .Interview staff members (on all shifts) who have had contact with the resident during the period of the alleged incident .the QA [Quality Assurance] team should evaluate the following .a. Changes that may need to be made to prevent further occurrences; b. Defining how care will be changed or improved to protect residents; c. Immediate and ongoing training needs and staff competency as needed; d. Identification of staff member(s) whom will carry out a-c; e. Identification of QAPI [Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement] team member whom will monitor the above . Review of the facility's Charge Nurse JOB DESCRIPTION, dated 6/2021, revealed .Perform administrative duties such as the documenting of: nurses' notes, doctors' orders .reports, evaluations .charts, resident assessments and care plans .Report accidents and incidents when they occur, including all complaints and grievances made by residents and/or their families . Review of the facility's policy titled, .Abuse Prevention Program, Screening of Employees, dated 8/2022, revealed .The facility administration and employees are committed to protecting residents from abuse by anyone including, but not necessarily limited to: facility staff, other residents, consultants, volunteers .family members .friends, visitors, or any other individual . Review of the facility's policy titled, .Abuse Program: Training, Reporting and Response, Covered Individual Responsibilities, dated 10/2022, revealed .The facility, through the Administrator or their designee, will report alleged violations related to .neglect, or abuse, including injuries of unknown source .the results of all investigations to the proper authorities within prescribed time frames . Review of the facility's electronic health record (EHR) neurochecks protocol revealed neurochecks were to be completed every 15 minutes times (x) 4, every 30 minutes x 4, every 1 hour x 2, then every shift x 72 hours. 2. Review of the medical record, revealed Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Dementia, Diabetes, Osteoarthritis, Psychosis, Scoliosis, and Anxiety. Review of the significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #5 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment, and required extensive assistance for activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of the Nurse Practitioner Progress Note dated 8/20/2022 at 8:05 AM, revealed .notified by nurse .resident complains of pain in L [left] shoulder .Will get STAT [urgent] xray of L shoulder. If abnormal pt [patient] will need FTF [Face to face] . Review of the Nursing Note dated 8/20/2022 at 8:21 AM, revealed .This nurse [Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2] was called to resident's room by CNA [Certified Nursing Assistant #1] asking me to assess resident arm d/t [due to] complaints of pain. Upon entering room, this nurse observed resident lying in bed with L arm cradled to side of body. Resident [Resident #5] stated her arm was 'hurting real [really] bad' when asked where she was hurting resident stated her shoulder while guarding her L arm. Limited ROM [Range of motion] noted. When this nurse asked resident what happened she stated there was 'a girl that worked with them (referring to the CNA at bedside) that was real rough.' This nurse notified unit manager on duty, DON [Director of Nursing] and telehealth contacted at this time. Orders given to STAT x-ray L shoulder and notify telehealth with results. Review of the Nursing Note dated 8/20/2022 at 2:45 PM, [Named mobile X-ray company] in facility to complete ordered x-rays . Review of the Nursing Note dated 8/20/2022 at 9:12 PM, revealed .X ray result indicates left shoulder humeral fracture .Resident was transferred to [named hospital] at 9:20pm [9:20 PM] . Review of the Nursing Note dated 8/21/2022 at 4:45 AM, revealed .Return with injury to L humeral, swollen, warm to touch, sling placed. Follow up appointment with [named Orthopedic Clinic] .within a week . Observations in the resident's room on 11/17/2022 at 10:05 AM, 2:53 PM, and 11/21/2022 at 5:21 PM, revealed Resident #5 was lying in bed, her bed was against the wall on the right side, the call light was in reach, no side rails were present, no odors were noted, and the resident appeared thin and frail. Observation on 11/29/2022 at 9:17 AM, revealed Resident #5 was in bed, the head of her bed was raised, she was awake and alert, her call light was in reach. During an interview conducted on 12/5/2022 at 4:15 PM, CNA #1 was asked about Resident #5's incident. CNA #1 stated, I went in to dry [named Resident #5] she didn't say nothing when I flipped her toward the wall then I turned her back toward me she said 'oh' I asked her what's wrong. [Named Resident #5] said 'I'm hurting, my arm.' I asked her what happened to you she said 'that girl beat the [expletive] out of me' I ran out of the room for the nurse. I got [named LPN #1] and told him [named Resident #5] said her arm hurt that a girl beat the [expletive] out of her. So, we went into her room. He asked her and she told him the same thing. I said what you going to do before I leave. He said I'm going to order an x-ray. He said for me to go on home he would handle it. The next morning [8/20/2022] when I came in .I had the same section. I went in and asked [named Resident #5] how you doing today. She said her arm still hurt. I ran got the other nurse, [named LPN #2]. Told her to check on [name Resident #5] her arm still hurts. Told her [named LPN #1] was supposed to got an x-ray last night [8/19/2022]. [Named LPN #2] pulled the cover back, and she said, 'I think her arm is broke'. I told her about telling [named LPN #1] the night before [8/19/2022], and evidently didn't order the x-ray he said he was going to order. The left arm was purple in color at the upper arm. [Named LPN #2] went got 2 other nurses, and they came in the room. They said to get x-ray ordered. [Named Resident #5] stated the white girl beat her. She is sometimes oriented. She recognizes me and I talk with her regularly. This is the first time I ever heard her say something like this had happened. During an interview conducted on 12/6/2022 at 10:15 AM, LPN #2 was asked about the incident with Resident #5. LPN #2 stated, .I came in to work on 8/20/2022 at about 7:30. [Named CNA #1] came to me and stated she had reported to [named LPN #1] the night before [8/19/2022] that [named Resident #5] had been complaining of arm pain. The resident was still complaining the next morning of arm pain and [named CNA #1] came to get me. I assessed the resident's arm. I got [named LPN #6] to come assess resident's arm. Her arm had bruising at the bicep area of her arm, and the shoulder area didn't look right. We contacted telehealth and got an order for x-ray and notified the DON and Administrator. It was a STAT order for x-ray. They came and done the x-ray. We got a phone call and fax alert with the result of x-ray. I relayed the results to telehealth doctor, and they gave orders to send her [Resident #5] to the ER [Emergency Room]. I believe it was on my shift I sent her out to ER. She was complaining of pain . LPN #2 was asked if Resident #5 told her what happened to her arm. LPN #2 stated, [Named Resident #5] told me the 'big white, fat, bi*** shook' her. I wasn't here the day before [8/19/2022] .[Named CNA #4] does fit that description . During an interview conducted on 12/6/2022 at 10:49 AM, LPN #6 was asked about the incident with Resident #5. LPN #6 stated, [Named LPN #2] came got me and wanted me to look at her [Resident #5's] arm. Her left arm was bruised and didn't look right. I instructed to call [named former DON] and tell her it's an injury of unknown origin. [Named Resident #5] said 'that girl hurt my arm, she was stout as a bull, and she hurt my arm.' I told [named LPN #2] to call telehealth, family, and doctor, and let them know. They came and did X-ray .I know she did go to the hospital . During a telephone interview conducted on 12/8/2022 at 9:35 AM, CNA #4 was asked about the incident with Resident #5. CNA #4 confirmed the former DON called her about the bruising found on Resident #5. CNA #4 confirmed she was 1 of the 2 white CNAs and stated, .possibility I worked, I don't remember working with her that day . During a telephone interview conducted on 12/8/2022 at 12:40 PM, the former Administrator was asked about the incident with Resident #5. The former Administrator stated, I do remember that. An abuse incident should have been done. [Named Resident #5] described [Named CNA #4], but she didn't work with her in that time frame. The doctor had seen her on Wednesday, and she told us on Friday .I spoke with MD [Medical Doctor] and FNP [Family Nurse Practitioner] .and she didn't have any problem of pain. The person she described didn't work in that time frame. We looked at the schedule to see what staff worked .had diagnoses of fractures in past. We did see that she had comorbidities and we noted she had a turtleneck on. She could have been injured putting on that tight turtleneck. We concluded unsubstantiated abuse, but she had a fracture from manipulating her arm, instead of intentionally hurting her . During a telephone interview conducted on 12/14/2022 at 8:44 AM, LPN #1 was asked about the incident with Resident #5's injured arm. LPN #1 confirmed his statement dated 9/8/2022 was true, and that Resident #5 did not have any falls on his shift. LPN #1 stated, I was told by the nurse when I came on, that she [Resident #5] had a fracture per x-ray . Resident #5 first said she was in pain and alleged abuse by a staff member on 8/19/2022 at about 7:00 PM, to CNA #1. CNA #1 alleged she reported the allegation to LPN #1 that night. LPN #1 did not document an assessment of Resident #5, did not do an incident report, and did not report the allegation of abuse. CNA #1 reported the same to LPN #2 on 8/20/2022, about 12 hours later. Resident was given Tylenol for the pain on 8/20/2022 at 8:00 AM, an X-ray was obtained at 2:45 PM on 8/20/2022, and results showed left humerus fracture. Tylenol was given again at 8:39 PM on 8/20/2022, when Resident #5 was transferred out to a hospital for the fracture. Therefore, Resident #5 suffered with the fracture for over 24 hours with only two doses of Tylenol for pain before being sent out to the hospital. This resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy for neglect of Resident #5. 3. Review of the medical record, revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of Schizophrenia, Dementia with Behavioral Disturbance, Chronic Kidney Disease, Seizures, Malnutrition, and Chronic Hepatitis C. Review of the quarterly MDS dated [DATE], revealed Resident #1 had severely impaired cognition, physical behaviors directed towards others on 4-6 of 7 days, and verbal behaviors directed towards others on 1-3 of 7 days. Review of the Care Plan revised 9/9/2022, revealed .History of Exhibits violent angry outburst and behavior problems towards staff and other residents .Violent outburst on 2 other residents .Sent to [named hospital] and returned .Placed on One-on-one supervision/care . Review of the Nurses Note dated 9/20/2022 at 5:17 AM, revealed, .Res [Resident] did get up and wonder [wander] periodically and push on exit door handles. No one on one personnel avail [available] for res [resident] and staff safety. DON [Director of Nursing] notified . Review of the Nurses Note dated 9/21/2022 at 12:20 AM, revealed .No one on one personnel avail for res and staff safety .DON notified . Review of daily assignment sheets for 9/8/2022-12/2/2022 revealed the following: a. One (1) CNA [Certified Nursing Assistant] was assigned to the Gardens [secure locked unit] from 7:00 PM-7:00 AM, and no one was assigned to provide one on one supervision for Resident #1 on 9/8/2022, 9/10/2022, 9/15/2022, 9/22/2022, 9/24/2022, and 9/27/2022. b. Two (2) CNAs were assigned to the Gardens from 7:00 PM to 7:00 AM and no one was assigned to provide one on one supervision for Resident #1 on 9/9/2022, 9/11/2022, 9/14/2022, 9/16/2022, 9/19/2022, 9/23/2022, 9/25/2022, 9/26/2022, 10/2/2022, 10/14/2022, 10/23/2022, 10/24/2022, 11/11/2022, 11/12/2022, 11/15/2022, and 11/30/2022. c. No one was assigned to provide one on one supervision for Resident #1 from 3:00 PM-7:00 PM on 10/31/2022. d. No one was assigned to provide one on one supervision for Resident #1 from 7:00 AM-7:00 PM on 12/2/2022. Review of the Incident Report dated 11/10/2022 at 2:15 PM, revealed Resident #1 was observed lying on his back on the hallway floor and Resident #2 was on top of him. Resident #2 had his hands around Resident #1's throat. 4. Review of the medical record, revealed Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of Alzheimer's, Hypertension, Depression, and Dementia. Review of the quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #3 had a BIMS of 3, which indicated severe cognitive impairment, and no behaviors were coded. Review of a witness statement signed by CNA #5 and dated 9/7/2022, revealed CNA #5 was giving shift report to CNA #6 on 9/7/2022 at approximately 6:55 PM. Resident #3 walked toward Resident #1 who was sitting in a chair in the Day Room, Resident #1 reached up and struck Resident #3 with his closed fist on her left jaw. CNA #6 stepped in between the residents and CNA #5 took Resident #3 to a safe area. The CNAs reported the incident to LPN #3. Observation in the Day Room on 11/17/2022 at 10:21 AM, revealed Resident #3 was fully clothed, sat in a wheelchair, and watched television. Observation in the Resident's Room on 11/28/22 at 10:27 AM, revealed Resident #3 was in bed, her eyes were closed, and she appeared to be asleep. Observation in the Resident's Room on 12/6/22 at 2:56 PM, revealed Resident #3 was in bed, her head was covered with a wrap, and she was turned toward the wall. 6. Review of the medical record, revealed Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Alzheimer's Disease, Dementia, Hypertension, and Malnutrition. Review of the quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #4 had severe cognitive impairment. Review of an Incident Audit Report dated 9/7/2022, revealed .Incident Description .9/07/2022 [9/7/2022] .20:45 [8:45 PM] .Writer [LPN #3] standing at med [medication] cart passing medication when writer observed res [Resident #1] walking up behind res [Resident #4] .Res [Resident #1] struck res .[Resident #4] .in the rear right side of his neck with a closed fist. Writer immediately jumped in between the residents and redirected res .Resident #1] .away from res [Resident #4] .Writer walked down to his room and put cna [CNA] as one on one with res. [Resident #1]. Writer went back and assessed resident [Resident #4], Res [Resident #4] had no obvious signs of injury and made no faces of pain or any complaints . Observation in the Day Room on 11/17/22 at 10:23 AM, revealed Resident #4 was fully clothed, sat in a chair, and played with the drawstring of his pants. Observation on the Secure Unit hall on 11/29/22 at 9:14 AM, revealed Resident #4 was fully clothed, sat in a chair, his eyes were closed, and he appeared to be asleep. Observation in the Activity Room on 12/2/22 at 10:45 AM, revealed Resident #4 interacted with other residents. During an interview conducted on 11/17/2022 at 9:15 AM, the Interim Administrator confirmed staff was not providing one on one care for Resident #1 at the time of the incident on 11/10/2022. During an interview conducted on 11/17/2022 at 1:47 PM, CNA #2 confirmed she was scheduled to sit one on one with Resident #1 on 11/10/2022 from 7:00 AM-7:00 PM. CNA #2 was asked what time she arrived. CNA #2 stated, About 2 [2:00 PM] .I clocked in, put my belongings up in the breakroom in the Gardens, then used the restroom in the breakroom, and, literally, we heard the commotion . CNA #2 was asked if she saw anyone sitting outside Resident#1's room when she arrived. CNA #2 stated, No, there was no one out there . CNA #2 was asked if there were there any papers on the table. CNA #2 stated, No, it wasn't there. I had to ask for it [1:1 Monitoring Sheet] . CNA #2 was asked who was supposed to be sitting with him before she arrived. CNA #2 stated, That I'm not for sure .they knew I was running late and expected somebody to be there when I arrived .they always said that somebody needs to be with him .so I thought by me running late, they would have somebody there. CNA #2 was asked what she saw when she heard the commotion and came out of the break room. CNA #2 stated, [Named Resident #2] was on top of [named Resident #1] saying 'he hit me .he hit me in the back of my head' . CNA #2 was asked if she had ever seen Resident #1 be aggressive toward anyone. CNA #2 stated, Yes .He will get angry toward me to the point where I'm literally scared, and I have seen him get mean and holler at other residents or staff, and I did see him hit one of our other staff members before .it can be like a light switch. He will be sweet one second and then just flip. You never know when he will get in that mood . During an interview on 11/17/2022 at 2:20 PM, LPN #6 was asked who was sitting with Resident #1 when CNA #2 arrived on 11/10/2022. LPN #6 stated, No one, [named the Scheduler] said [named CNA #2] was going to be late .we had to just watch out for him .do the best we could. LPN #6 was asked if anyone was with him when the incident happened. LPN #6 stated, No . LPN #6 was asked if she asked the Scheduler when she realized CNA #2 was going to be late. LPN #6 stated, I did, I was like who is coming in .She said she was going to talk to .the Restorative Aide to come sit with him until CNA #2 came in. LPN #6 was asked if the Restorative Aide came to sit with him. LPN #6 stated, No. LPN #6 was asked if he was ever alone. LPN #6 stated, Yes ma'am. We would just check .he was sleeping, which made it easy for us to watch . LPN #6 was asked if she saw the altercation between Resident #1 and Resident #2. LPN #6 stated, No. During an interview on 11/17/2022 at 2:37 PM, the Nurse Practitioner (NP) was asked if Resident #1 was supposed to have someone with him at all times. The NP stated, Yes, he's on 1 on 1 supervision .it was my understanding that no one was actually assigned to him that day. They were having to more or less take turns watching him. I wasn't aware at the time .but there was no one assigned to him that day . During an interview conducted on 11/21/2022 at 2:43 PM, LPN #3 confirmed Resident #1 was placed on 1:1 monitoring on 9/8/2022 after 2 altercations with other residents. LPN #3 stated, .I said look this guy just can't keep walking around here hitting people . LPN #3 was asked if staff was provided to sit 1 on 1 with Resident #1 on 9/20/2022. LPN #3 confirmed no one was available to sit with Resident #1. LPN #3 stated, .That was like my last resort of asking them over and over again, and nobody was doing nothing . LPN #3 was asked what the DON said when she was notified. LPN #3 stated, She told me that she would get somebody, or she would call the staffing person .but nothing ever happened .I had one CNA I had to take off the floor. I had 2, I had 1 do the 1 on 1. One CNA would get a section and 1 on 1 [assigned to take care of the men and provide one on one care for Resident #1] and the other CNA had the women. LPN #3 was asked what if the CNA that was assigned to take care of the men and sit one on one with resident #1 had to take care of someone else. LPN #3 stated, The rationale was he was asleep through the night . LPN #3 was asked if there were other times when Resident #1 was left alone. LPN #3 stated, Oh yeah absolutely, when she was making rounds .I knew that still wasn't adequate, so that's why I started documenting . LPN #3 was asked if the same issue was present with no staff scheduled for 1 on 1 supervision for Resident #1 on 9/21/2022. LPN #3 stated, Yes ma'am, the same issue. Then what they started doing was, once they realized that I was documenting, they started scheduling 1 on 1 for my shift only .they brought somebody in. They did it right once I started documenting, so when I wasn't working or on the weekends .the only reason I know is because I picked up [weekend shifts] .you've got 2 CNAs on the hall .it's impossible, because that means she [the CNA providing 1 on one supervision for Resident #1] wouldn't have cared for anybody else. LPN #3 was asked if the facility provided any special education for providing 1 on 1 supervision for Resident #1. LPN #3 stated, No, it was just like they didn't want to do 1 on 1, but if they had to it was just like grab somebody and sit with him .with [Resident #1] you need somebody who understands his disability, his dementia, and triggers, and be proactive in stopping triggers .to keep him from becoming violent, if they had taken the time to do it right .they could've . LPN #3 was asked if it was safe for the other residents for Resident #1 to be left unsupervised. LPN #3 stated, Oh, absolutely not. During an interview conducted on 11/21/2022 at 3:54 PM, the Interim Administrator confirmed the 1:1 Monitoring sheets were incomplete. The Interim Administrator stated, .Originally, we thought she was sitting with him when technically, when she came to work, she put her stuff down and went to the bathroom, she had not technically gone to sit with him yet .basically what we failed to do was follow the resident's plan of care .we determined that the resident's POC [Plan of Care] was not followed per doctor's orders .resulted in physical altercation [with Resident #2] . During an interview conducted on 12/1/2022 at 12:00 PM, the Medical Director confirmed he was not aware there were days the facility did not have staff to provide 1 on 1 monitoring for Resident #1, and that Resident #1 always needed staff supervision. During a telephone interview on 12/1/2022 at 3:13 PM, the Regional Nurse Consultant (RNC) confirmed she was not part of the determination to place Resident #1 in 1 on 1 monitoring indefinitely. The RNC stated, .Have a task in POC [Point of Care CNA documentation system] which, to my understanding, they did not utilize .they were using paper .the 1 on 1 documentation .should have been in POC .I wasn't aware until sometime in October that he had been on 1 on 1 for this extended period of time . The RNC confirmed that she was not aware there were days the facility did not provide staff for 1 on 1 monitoring until 11/10/2022, when she saw the resident-to-resident incident submitted. The RNC stated, .that's not a resident-to-resident, that's a report under neglect, because he was care-planned for 1 on 1 .if there was a staffing issue .supposed to notify [named interim Administrator] and then [named IDON] to obtain a replacement . 5. Review of the closed medical record, revealed Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of Dementia with Psychotic Disturbance, Diabetes, Epilepsy, Schizoaffective Disorder, and Speech Disorder. Review of the annual MDS assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #2 had a BIMS of 11, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. Review of the Incident Report dated 8/21/2022, revealed Resident #2, who had highly impaired vision, ran over Resident #1's foot accidentally. Resident #1 hit [Resident #2] on the back of the head with his open hand. Review of the Incident Report dated 8/28/2022 at 6:56 PM, revealed Resident #1 was observed lying on the Day Room floor in a sleeping position with a scratch on the left side of his face. There was blood on the floor. Resident #2 was in his wheelchair, his lip was bloody, and he was holding onto Resident #1's arm, holding him on the floor. The altercation was unwitnessed and neither resident was able to tell staff what happened. Review of the Nursing Noted dated 11/10/2022 at 3;09 PM, revealed Resident #1 was observed lying on the floor, Resident #2 was on top of Resident #1 and had his hands around Resident #1's throat. Resident #2 was yelling He hit me in my head. During an interview conducted on 12/7/2022 at 9:03 AM, the MDS Coordinator was asked about the incident between Resident #1 and Resident #2. The MDS Coordinator confirmed the Care Plan for Resident #1 was not being followed for 1 on 1 monitoring, which resulted in an altercation between Resident #1 and Resident #2 on 11/10/2022. The facility failed to follow the Care Plan to monitor Resident #1 after the incident with Residents #3 and #4, and he later assaulted Resident #2. 6. Review of the closed medical record, revealed Resident #14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of COVID-19, Cerebral Infarction, Dementia, Alzheimer's Disease, Osteoporosis, Anxiety, and Vitamin D Deficiency. Review of the quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #14 had a BIMS of 4, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Review of the Nursing Note dated 10/27/2022 at 6:15 AM, revealed .[Named Resident #14] observed sitting on floor by his wheelchair .stated he was attempting to walk .Staff reeducated resident about att [attempting] to ambulate without asst [assistance] .DON [Director of Nursing] notified . Review of the fall Incident Report dated 10/27/2022, revealed Resident #14 sustained an unwitnessed fall with no injuries. Review of the fall investigation dated 10/27/2022, revealed the only neurochecks were completed on 10/27/2022 at 7:32 AM, 7:47 AM, and 8:02 AM. Neurocheck assessments were not completed for 72 hours per the facility's protocol for unwitnessed falls. Review of the Nursing Note dated 10/28/2022 at 7:07 AM, revealed .Therapy .went in res [resident's] rm [room] to perform exercise .Res complained of pain when therapy att [attempted] to get him up .advised oncoming nurse .MD [medical doctor] notified .bilat [bilateral] x-ray . Review of the telehealth Progress Notes dated 10/28/2022 at 1:48 PM, revealed .resident c/o [complained of] L hip pain .had a fall on 10/27/2022 at 0630 [6:30 AM] .Patient highly confused. Nurse states patient normally gets up to eat and do activities but refusing to get out of bed .decreased ROM to L hip .ASSESSMENT/DIAGNOSIS PLAN NOTES .Pain in left hip .STAT xray left hip 2 views . Review of the Physician's Order dated 10/29/2022, revealed a bilateral hip x-ray was ordered. The order was not entered into the electronic health record (EHR) as STAT and was not entered on the day the order was given [10/28/2022]. Review of the Nursing Note dated 10/29/2022 at 3:09 PM, revealed .[named mobile radiology company] completed hip xray. awaiting results at this time. Review of the Nursing Noted dated 10/31/2022 at 9:30 AM, showed the x-ray results revealed Resident #14 had a left hip fracture with moderate displacement. Facility notified the provider who gave an order to send the resident to the emergency room. Review of the Nursing Note dated 10/31/2022 at 10:25 AM, revealed Resident #14 was transferred to the emergency room for treatment of his left hip fracture [4 days after the fall]. During an interview conducted on 11/22/2022 at 12:16 PM, LPN #2 confirmed she worked 10/28/2022, the day following Resident #14's fall. LPN #2 stated, .Friday [10/28/2022] morning I come [came] back in to work and was told .he was complaining of pain and refusing to get up .[named LPN #3] said he had called telehealth .was just needing help getting the x-ray ordered through the mobile x-ray company .he said he needed help calling and we don't call, we do it all online .the password wasn't valid, and I couldn't log on to [named the mobile x-ray site] .when [named LPN #6] come [came] in, I asked her for the password, so we could get it ordered .[named LPN #6] took over the whole situation . During an interview conducted on 11/23/2022 at 9:39 AM, the Physical Therapist stated, .went in to do his [Resident #14] treatment, he had been able to sit, stand and transfer .he couldn't stand .because of pain .went and found [named LPN #3] .walked down with me and did assess him .[Resident #14] moaned and verbally complained about his left hip which was uncharacteristic of him .he would move his right side and say see no pain here, it's [pain] just right here .indicated his left upper leg . During an interview conducted on 12/1/2022 at 12:00 PM, the Medical Director confirmed that facility staff should fully follow physician's orders and should have followed up on R[TRUNCATED]
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, medical record review, review of daily assignment sheets, time detail reports, Safety Check Log (1:1 Mon...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, medical record review, review of daily assignment sheets, time detail reports, Safety Check Log (1:1 Monitoring logs), and interview, the facility failed to implement care plan interventions for 1:1 monitoring for 1 of 18 (Resident #1) sampled residents which resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy when Resident #1, a severely cognitively impaired resident with a history of aggression and physical altercations, was left unattended by staff on 11/10/2022 and struck another resident (Resident #2) in the head, initiating an altercation. Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) is a situation in which a provider's non-compliance with one or more requirements of participation has caused, or is likely to cause, severe injury, harm, impairment, or death to a resident. The Administrator was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 12/8/2022 at 10:07 AM, in the Conference Room. The facility was cited Immediate Jeopardy at F-656. The facility was cited at F-656 at a scope and severity of J. A partial extended survey was conducted from 12/12/2022 through 12/13/2022. The IJ was effective 8/19/2022 through 12/13/2022. An acceptable Removal Plan, which removed the immediacy of the jeopardy, was received on 12/13/2021 at 8:42 AM, and was validated onsite by the surveyors on 12/14/2022 through review of root cause analysis, in-services, audits, and staff interviews conducted. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Using the Care Plan, dated 5/2022 revealed, .The care plan shall be used in developing the resident's daily care routines and will be available to staff personnel who have responsibility for providing care or services to the resident . 2. Review of the medical record, revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Schizophrenia, Dementia with Mood Disturbance/Behavioral Disturbance/Psychotic Disturbance, Seizures, Hypertension, and Chronic Hepatitis C. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 had severely impaired cognition, physical behaviors directed towards others on 4-6 of 7 days and verbal behaviors directed towards others on 1-3 of 7 days. Review of the Care Plan dated 4/8/2022 revealed, .History of Exhibits violent angry outburst and behavior problems towards staff and other residents .9/8/22 Violent outburst on 2 other residents .Sent to [named hospital] and returned .Placed on One-on-one supervision/care .revised 9/9/2022 . Review of the telehealth Physician's Progress Note dated 9/7/2022 at 9:28 PM, revealed, .pt [patient - Resident #1] having severe psychosis. assaulted 2 other residents. agree w/ [with] RN [Registered Nurse] that patient should go under 48 hours psych [psychiatric] watch . Review of the Nurses Note dated 9/9/2022 at 2:03 AM revealed, Resident is on one on one [supervision] at this time. Review of the Nurses Note dated 9/20/2022 at 5:17 AM revealed, Res [Resident #1] sleep most of shift, no behaviors noted. Res did get up and wonder [wander] periodically and push on exit door handles. No one on one personnel avail [available] for res [resident] and staff safety. DON [Director of Nursing] notified . Review of the Nurses Note dated 9/21/2022 at 12:20 AM revealed, Res sleep most of shift, no behaviors noted. No one on one personnel avail for res and staff safety DON notified . Review of the daily assignment sheet dated 11/10/2022 revealed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #2 was assigned to work on the Garden's Hall (secure unit), where Resident #1 resided, from 7:00 AM -7:00 PM with 2 other CNAs. Review of time detail report dated 11/10/2022 revealed CNA #2 clocked in at 1:52 PM. Review of the Nurses Note dated 11/10/2022 at 2:49 PM revealed, .Resident observed laying in hallway floor on back with resident .[Resident #2] laying on top of him .while on floor resident .[Resident #2] was observed with hands around [named Resident #1] neck . There was no documentation Resident #1 was on 1:1 staff observations during this time. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #1 was transferred to the emergency room (ER) evaluation on 11/11/2022 and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Physician's Progress Note dated 11/15/2022 at 7:18 PM revealed, .readmitted after an altercation with another resident on last week. Resident was being attacked by another resident [Resident #2] after the other resident stated [named Resident#1] hit him on his head .He is being supervised by staff, as he has been on 1:1 supervision for some time due to his attacks towards other residents in the past . 3. Review of daily assignment sheets from 9/8/2022-12/2/2022 revealed the following: On 9/8/2022, 9/10/2022, 9/15/2022, 9/22/2022, 9/24/2022, and 9/27/2022 there was one (1) CNA assigned to the Gardens Hall (Secure Unit) from 7:00 PM-7:00 AM, and there was no staff assigned to be on 1:1 with Resident #1. On 9/9/2022, 9/11/2022, 9/14/2022, 9/16/2022, 9/19/2022, 9/23/2022, 9/25/2022, 9/26/2022, 10/2/2022, 10/14/2022, 10/23/2022, 10/24/2022, 11/11/2022, 11/12/2022, 11/15/2022, and 11/30/2022 there were 2 CNAs assigned to the Gardens Hall from 7:00 PM to 7:00 AM, and no staff was assigned to be on 1:1 with Resident #1. No staff was assigned to be on 1:1 with Resident #1 from 3:00 PM-7:00 PM on 10/31/2022. No staff was assigned to be on 1:1 with Resident #1 from 7:00 AM-7:00 PM on 12/2/2022. 4. Review of the 1:1 Monitoring Sheets dated 9/8/2022-11/21/2022, revealed there was no documentation Resident #1 was being observed 1:1 on the following dates: (a) On 9/17/2022, 9/21/2022, 9/23/2022, 9/24/2022, 9/25/2022, 9/26/2022, 11/6/2022, and 11/10/2022. (b) On 10/22/2022 and 10/24/2022 from 7:00 AM to 7:00 PM. (c) On 11/1/2022 from 3:00 AM through 7:00 AM. (d) On 11/5/2022 from 7:00 AM through 11:59 PM. 5. During an interview conducted on 11/17/2022 at 9:15 AM, the Interim Administrator confirmed staff were not providing 1:1 care to Resident #1 at the time of the incident on 11/10/2022. During an interview conducted on 11/17/2022 at 1:47 PM, CNA #2 confirmed she was scheduled to observe 1:1 with Resident #1 on 11/10/2022 from 7:00 AM-7:00 PM. CNA #2 was asked what time she arrived. CNA #2 stated, About 2 [2:00 PM] .I clocked in, put my belongings up in the break room in the Gardens [Secure Unit], then used the restroom in the break room and literally we heard the commotion . CNA #2 was asked did you see anyone sitting outside Resident #1's room when you arrived. CNA #2 stated, No there was no one out there .a chair and an overbed table. CNA #2 was asked were there any papers on the table. CNA #2 stated, No it wasn't there I had to ask for it [1:1 Monitoring Sheet] . CNA #2 was asked who was supposed to be sitting with him before you arrived. CNA #2 stated, That I'm not for sure .they knew I was running late and expected somebody to be there when I arrived .they always said that somebody needs to be with him .so I thought by me running late they would have somebody there. CNA #2 was asked when you heard the commotion and came out of the break room, what did you see. CNA #2 stated, [Resident #2] was on top of [Resident #1] saying he hit me, he hit in the back of my head . CNA #2 was asked if she ever saw Resident #1 be aggressive toward anyone. CNA #2 stated, Yes .He will get angry toward me to the point where I'm literally scared, and I have seen him get mean and holler at other residents or staff; and I did see him hit one of our other staff members before .it can be like a light switch. He will be sweet one second and then just flip. You never know when he will get in that mood . During an interview conducted on 11/17/2022 at 2:20 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #6 was asked who was sitting with Resident #1 when CNA #2 arrived on 11/10/2022. LPN #6 stated, No one, [named the Scheduler] said [CNA #2] was going to be late .we had to just watch out for him to do the best we could. LPN #6 was asked if anyone was with him when this incident happened. LPN #6 stated, No . LPN #6 was asked when she realized CNA #2 was going to be late, if she informed the Scheduler. LPN #6 stated, I did, I was like who is coming in .She said she was going to talk to .the Restorative Aide to come sit with him until CNA #2 came in. LPN #6 was asked if the Restorative Aide came. LPN #6 stated, No. LPN #6 was asked if Resident #1 was alone at times. LPN #6 stated, Yes ma'am, we would just check .he was sleeping which made it easy for us to watch . LPN #6 was asked if anyone saw the altercation between Resident #1 and Resident #2. LPN #6 stated, No. During an interview conducted on 11/17/2022 at 2:37 PM, the Nurse Practitioner (NP) was asked if Resident #1 was supposed to have someone with him at all times. The NP stated, Yes, he's on one to one supervision .it was my understanding that no one was actually assigned to him that day, they were having to more or less take turns watching him. I wasn't aware at the time, but when I came to break up the altercation, the older CNA said something about maybe we were changing shifts .when the on-coming is coming on, the one leaving shouldn't leave his side, and I educated them about that .but there was no one assigned to him that day . During an interview on 11/21/2022 at 9:44 AM, the Interim Director of Nursing (IDON) confirmed the 1:1 Monitoring sheet documentation was incomplete. The IDON stated, .They are very random, they are not complete .I just collected what we had .I put them in order .obviously I saw that was not being done correctly . During an interview on 11/21/2022 at 10:10 AM, the Scheduler was asked if CNA #2 called and told her she was going to be late on 11/10/2022. The Scheduler stated, She texted my phone and told me she would be late, something about court. I told the nurse .she's going to be late .I was on a cart working . The Scheduler was asked if she knew what time CNA #2 arrived. The Scheduler stated, No, ma'am, I don't have access .that day [named CNA #2] was one on one . The Scheduler was asked who was one on one with Resident #1 until CNA #2 arrived. The Scheduler stated, I can't answer that, because I was on a cart on this side. The Scheduler was asked if she told anyone that she would send the Restorative Aide around to sit one on one with Resident #1. The Scheduler stated, No, I did not .if I'm on a cart, I don't do anything dealing with the staffing part, the staffing is already done .I just know I told the nurse that morning she was going to be late. The Scheduler was asked what her plan was for one on one with Resident #1. The Scheduler stated, I always tell the nurse, there's a unit manager back there, and there's a nurse and we can all help out .that's the way it's supposed to be . The Scheduler was asked if she knew what time she was told that CNA #2 had not made it to work yet. The Scheduler stated, .I was thinking it was around 11, I was in the Dining Room . The Scheduler was asked if she notified anyone that nobody was 1:1 with Resident #1 at that point. The Scheduler stated, No ma'am. During an interview conducted on 11/21/2022 at 2:43 PM, LPN #3 confirmed Resident #1 was placed on 1:1 monitoring on 9/8/2022 after 2 altercations with other residents. LPN #3 stated, .I said look this guy just can't keep walking around here hitting people . LPN #3 was asked they did not provide you staff to sit 1:1 on 9/20/2022. LPN #3 stated, That's correct .that was like my last resort of asking them over and over again and nobody was doing nothing . LPN #3 was asked when you notified the DON, what did she tell you. LPN #3 stated, She told me that she would get somebody or she would call the staffing person .but nothing ever happened .I had one CNA, I had to take 1 off the floor. I had 2, I had one do the 1 on 1. One CNA would get a section and 1 on 1 [assigned to take care of the men and provide 1:1 supervision for Resident #1] and the other CNA had the women. LPN #3 was asked what if the CNA assigned to men and 1:1 for Resident #1 had to take care of somebody else. LPN #3 stated, The rationale was he was asleep through the night, but I was trying to tell them [didn't have 1:1 staff]. LPN #3 was asked were there times when Resident #1 was left alone. LPN #3 stated, Oh yeah absolutely, when she was making rounds .I knew that still wasn't adequate, so that's why I started documenting . LPN #3 was asked if on 9/21/2022 there was the same issue with no staff scheduled for 1 on 1. LPN #3 stated, Yes ma'am, the same issue. Then what they started doing was once they realized that I was documenting, they started scheduling 1 on 1 for my shift only .they brought somebody in. They did it right once I started documenting, so when I wasn't working or on the weekends .the only reason I know is because I picked up [weekend shifts] .you've got 2 CNAs on the hall .it's impossible because that means she wouldn't have cared for anybody else. LPN #3 was asked did the facility provide any special education for 1 on 1. LPN #3 stated, No, it was just like they didn't want to do 1 on 1 but if they had to it was just like grab somebody and sit with him .with [Resident #1] you need somebody who understands his disability, his dementia, and triggers, and be proactive in stopping triggers .to keep him from becoming violent, if they had taken the time to do it right .they could've . LPN #3 was asked was it safe for the other residents for Resident #1 to be left unsupervised. LPN #3 stated, Oh, absolutely not. During an interview conducted on 11/21/2022 at 3:54 PM, the Interim Administrator confirmed the 1:1 Monitoring sheets were incomplete. The Interim Administrator stated, .Originally, we thought she was sitting with him when technically when she came to work, she put her stuff down and went to the bathroom, she had not technically gone to sit with him yet .basically what we failed to do was follow the resident's plan of care .we determined that the resident's POC [Plan of Care] was not followed per doctor's orders .resulted in physical altercation [with Resident #2] . During an interview conducted on 11/22/2022 at 11:15 AM, LPN #4 confirmed she was working on 11/10/2022. LPN #4 was asked when she was made aware that there was not a staff member for 1:1 for Resident #1. LPN #4 stated, .I was in meetings, so I think it was at the care plan meeting I was made aware the aide hadn't made it in yet and the [Scheduler] was made aware, also the DON .it was told that they were going to get someone to cover the 1 on 1 .the nurse on the unit told me the [Scheduler] was going to send someone down to take care of the 1 on 1 .I had to take care of PAR [the Patients at Risk meeting]. LPN #4 was asked what time the care plan meeting started. LPN #4 stated, Right after morning meeting, don't know if we were done early or late .It [the altercation] happened during PAR and the nurse called me down there and told me what had took place, I left PAR . LPN #4 was asked if PAR took place right after the care plan meeting. LPN #4 stated, PAR happens at 1:30 [PM]. Care Plan depends on how many residents there are on care plan . LPN #4 was asked what she did when she arrived on the hall. LPN #4 stated, Trying to figure out why it occurred, and the aide that was supposed to be in 1 on 1 wasn't down there when it happened .They had me down there thinking she was sitting with him .I wasn't aware of that part .I was thinking she was down there sitting with him and had to get up and go to the restroom .I wasn't aware that she had just come in and put her stuff down . LPN #4 was asked as the Unit Manager should she have been aware no one was sitting 1:1. LPN #4 stated, Yes ma'am. LPN #4 was asked if Resident #1 should be left alone at any time. LPN #4 stated, No ma'am. During an interview conducted on 11/29/2022 at 1:38 PM, the former DON denied having been notified of not having staff to provide 1:1 monitoring for Resident #1 on 9/20/2022 and 9/21/2022. The former DON was asked how did you ensure staff were competent to provide care and 1:1 monitoring of a combative, aggressive resident. The former DON stated, We have a [computer] course on de-escalating patients and our log that they're checking on him to make sure and documenting where he is . The former DON was asked what training was provided to staff regarding how to complete or fill out the 1:1 Monitoring tool. The former DON stated, I think it's pretty self-explanatory . The former DON was asked did you monitor those tools to ensure they were completed. The former DON stated, Truly, honestly I left that to be on the nurses. The former DON was asked were you aware there was no coverage for 1:1 for Resident #1 on 11/10/2022. The former DON stated, No .I did not know about it until after the incident . During an interview conducted on 12/1/2022 at 3:13 PM, the Regional Nurse Consultant (RNC) was asked were you aware there were days Resident #1 did not have 1 on 1 monitoring. The RNC stated, Not until November 10th when I saw a resident to resident be submitted that [named the Interim Administrator] and I had a conversation .that's not a Resident to Resident, that's reportable under neglect because he was care planned for 1 on 1 .if there was a staffing issue .supposed to notify [named interim Administrator] and then [named IDON] to obtain a replacement . During an interview conducted on 12/5/2022 at 9:55 AM, the Interim Administrator confirmed they could not find any de-escalation training that was completed prior to 12/2/2022. During an interview conducted on 12/7/2022 at 9:03 AM, the MDS Coordinator confirmed Resident #1's care plan was updated to include 1:1 monitoring on 9/9/2022 and the care plan was not being followed on 11/10/2022 when the incident between Resident #1 and Resident #2 occurred. The MDS Coordinator was asked should the care plan be followed. The MDS Coordinator stated, Absolutely. The MDS Coordinator was asked should Resident #1 be on continuous 1:1 monitoring. The MDS Coordinator stated, Yes. Refer to F-689 The surveyors verified the removal plan by review of root cause analysis, in-services, audits, and staff interviews conducted: NP educated the 2 CNAs involved with Resident #1 on one-to-one supervision. Surveyors verified by interview. RNC in-serviced RN/IDON and LPN Nurse Manager on Abuse Prevention Program, Recognizing Signs and Symptoms of Abuse/Neglect (Identification) to include notification of Admin (Administrator)/DON when staffing changes occur with 1:1. Nursing staff educated not to leave 1:1 resident without staff replacement. Charge Nurses educated to new protocol for 1:1 and notification. Surveyors verified by review of in-service documentation and interview. DON/Nurse Manager in-serviced staff on Abuse Prevention Program, Recognizing Signs and Symptoms of Abuse/Neglect (Identification) to include notification of Admin/DON when staffing changes occur with 1:1. Nursing staff to be educated not to leave 1:1 resident without staff replacement. Charge Nurses educated to new protocol for 1:1 and notification. Surveyors verified by review of in-service documentation and interview. RNC in-serviced RN/IDON and LPN Nurse Manager on use of crisis intervention technics, tips on managing challenging behaviors, and redirecting a client with challenging behaviors. Surveyors verified by review of in-service documentation and interview. DON/Nurse Manager in-serviced staff on use of crisis intervention technics, tips on managing challenging behaviors, and redirecting a client with challenging behaviors. This training started on 11/23/22. Additional staff will be in-serviced prior to working their next shift. Surveyors verified by review of in-service documentation and interview. Charge Nurse will sign at the end of each shift to verify documentation is complete. Surveyors verified by review of documentation. Medical Records will collect and audit 1:1 sheets routinely and scan into the electric record. Surveyors verified by interview. All new behaviors will be reviewed Monday through Friday during clinical start up for redirection/appropriate intervention and discuss and provide education according to needs. Surveyors verified by interview. DON implemented protocol and placed at NS (Nurses Station). All one-on-one orders for supervision are placed as a doctor's order on POC/PCC MAR (Point of Care CNA Documentation/Point Click Care Medication Administration Record). Surveyors verified by review of protocol and interview. QAPI (Quality Assurance Performance Improvement) was conducted November 18, 2022, with IDT (Interdisciplinary Team) and Medical Provider representative and completed RCA [Root Cause Analysis]. Surveyors verified by review of QAPI minutes. New staff will be educated on 1:1 process, crisis intervention and behavioral training upon hire. Surveyors verified by interview. QAPI will be held again 12/8/22 with Governing Body to discuss deficiency, education, systemic changes, and monitoring moving forward. Surveyors verified by review of QAPI minutes. Audit of Staffing sheets to be done 3 times (x) a week to assess compliance of assignment(s) of 1:1 weekly x 4 weeks then 1 x weekly for 8 weeks. Results of the audits will be submitted to the QAPI Committee for review and recommendation(s). Surveyors verified by review of audits and interview. DON/Nurse Manager will audit staff knowledge regarding behavioral scenarios and how to respond. Choosing 2 staff members 3 times a week x 4 weeks then 2 staff members 1 time a week x 8 weeks. The results of those audits will be sent to QAPI for eval and review. Surveyors verified by review of audits and interview. The facility's noncompliance of F-656 continues at a scope and severity of D for monitoring the effectiveness of the corrective actions. The facility is required to submit a Plan of Correction.
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, job description review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, job description review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that residents were provided appropriate care and services to meet the residents' physical, mental and/or psychosocial needs in a timely manner for 2 of 18 sampled residents (Resident #5 and #14) reviewed for quality of care. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) when Resident #5 complained of pain and abuse by a staff member and no one addressed this abuse allegation and injury until the next day; and when staff failed to acknowledge and implement an immediate (STAT) physician's order, follow up on radiology results, transfer a resident to the hospital in a timely manner, and provide pain relief for Resident #14. The facility's failure to provide appropriate care and services resulted in Immediate Jeopardy for Resident #5 and #14. Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) is a situation in which the provider's noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation has caused, or is likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to a resident. The Interim Administrator and Regional Vice-President were notified of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) for F-684 on 12/7/2022 at 5:31 PM, in the Conference Room. The facility was cited Immediate Jeopardy at F-684. The facility was cited at F-684 at a scope and a severity of J, which is Substandard Quality of Care. A partial extended survey was conducted from 12/12/2022 through 12/13/2022. The Immediate Jeopardy existed from 8/19/2022 through 12/13/2022. An acceptable Removal Plan which removed the immediacy of the jeopardy was received on 12/13/2022 at 10:44 PM, and was validated onsite by the Surveyors on 12/14/2022, through review of root-cause analysis, in-services, audits and staff interview conducted. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Request for Diagnostic Services . dated 5/2022, revealed, All requests for diagnostic services must be ordered by a physician .Orders for diagnostic services will be promptly carried out as instructed by the physician's order .Emergency requests must be labeled .stat .to assure that prompt action is taken . Review of the facility's policy titled, .Pain Clinical Protocols and Guidelines dated 10/2022, revealed, .Pain management will be provided to residents who require such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's goals and preferences .Through established assessments, the nursing staff will identify individuals who have pain or who are at risk for having pain .This includes a review of each person's known diagnoses and conditions that commonly cause or predispose to pain .It also includes a review for any treatments that the resident currently is receiving for pain, including complementary treatments .The nursing staff will assess each individual for pain .whenever there is a significant change in condition, and when there is onset of new pain or worsening of existing pain .Through the assessment process, the nursing staff will attempt identify the nature (characteristics such as location, intensity, frequency, pattern, etc.) and severity of pain .Staff will assess pain using a consistent approach and a standardized pain assessment instrument appropriate to the resident's cognitive level .The staff will observe the resident (during rest and movement) for evidence of pain .grimacing while being repositioned .The nursing staff will identify any situations or interventions where an increase in the resident's pain may be anticipated .ambulation .repositioning .Confer with the attending practitioner to help identify the extent to which underlying causes of pain can be addressed or reversed .Obtain orders for appropriate tests .x-rays as needed .Obtain orders for appropriate pain medications based upon the resident's current situation .PRN [as needed] doses should be monitored at time of request .Monitoring .PRN pain management response will be recorded post each dose given . 2. Review of the facility's unsigned Charge Nurse JOB DESCRIPTION dated 6/2021, revealed, .Perform administrative duties such as the documenting of: nurses' notes, doctors' orders .reports, evaluations .charts, resident assessments and care plans .Report accidents and incidents when they occur, including all complaints and grievances made by residents and /or their families, and immediately report any time a resident is observed leaving campus . 3. Review of the medical record, revealed Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Dementia, Diabetes, Osteoarthritis, Psychosis, Scoliosis, and Anxiety. Review of Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1 witness statement dated 8/20/2022, revealed that she entered Resident #5's room to change her prior to shift change at approximately 7:00 PM on 8/19/2022, and when she turned Resident #5 back toward her the resident yelled out in pain. CNA #1 asked the resident what was wrong and the resident complained of left (L) arm pain. CNA #1 documented in her statement that she reported the complaint to LPN #1, and they both went to the resident's room. CNA #1 documented that when LPN #1 had Resident #5 lift her arm, she cursed him out. CNA #1 documented that LPN #1 told her he would call for an xray. Review of the significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #5 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment, and required extensive assistance for activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of the Nursing Note dated 8/20/2022 at 8:21 AM [over 13 hours after Resident #5 complained of left arm pain], revealed, This nurse [Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2] was called to resident's room by CNA [Certified Nursing Assistant #1] asking me to assess resident arm d/t [due to] complaints of pain. Upon entering room, this nurse observed resident lying in bed with L arm cradled to side of body. Resident stated her arm was hurting real bad when asked where she was hurting resident stated her shoulder while guarding her L arm. Limited ROM [Range of motion] noted. When this nurse asked resident what happened she stated there was 'a girl that worked with them (referring to the CNAs) that was real rough and yanking' on her. This nurse notified unit manager on duty, DON [Director of Nursing] and telehealth contacted at this time. Orders given to STAT x-ray L shoulder and notify telehealth with results. Review of the Nursing Note dated 8/20/2022 at 2:45 PM [over 19 hours after Resident #5 complained of left arm pain], [Named mobile X-ray company] in facility to complete ordered x-rays. Reported to on-coming nurse . Review of the Nursing Note dated 8/20/2022 at 8:39 PM [over 25 hours after Resident #5 complained of left arm pain], revealed, .PRN Administration .Effective Follow-up Pain Scale was: 0. There was no documentation a pain medication had been administered to Resident #5 on the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for this date and time. Review of the Discharge summary dated [DATE] at 9:20 PM, revealed, .X ray result indicates left shoulder humeral fracture .notified telehealth and got order to transfer resident to hospital for further evaluation .transferred to [named hospital] at 9:20pm [9:20 PM]. Resident #5 was transferred to a hospital for treatment of the left arm fracture over 26 hours after she complained of left arm pain. Review of a Nursing Note created on 8/22/2022 at 8:11 AM, for a late entry note for 8/20/2022 timed at 10:45 AM, revealed, Late Entry .Daily skilled note for [named Resident #5]. See nursing notes, Resident sent to ER [Emergency Room] for follow up to STAT x-ray ordered this shift . This Nurses' Note was created two days later, and Resident #5 did not go to the hospital until 8/20/2022 at 9:20 PM, approximately 26 hours after Resident #5 first complained of bad pain. Review of the Nursing Note dated 8/21/2022 at 4:45 AM, revealed, Return with injury to L humeral, swollen, warm to touch, sling placed . Review of the Nursing Note dated 8/21/2022 at 7:13 PM, revealed PRN [as needed Tylenol for pain medication] Administration was: Effective Follow-up Pain Scale was: 0. The August 2022 MAR did not document this Tylenol was given on 8/21/2022. Review of the Nursing Note created on 8/22/2022 at 7:32 AM, for a late entry note for 8/21/2022 revealed, Resident resting throughout shift PRN [as needed] Tylenol given for pain .Sling in place throughout shift . The August 2022 MAR did not document this Tylenol had been administered on this date and time. Review of the Nursing Note created on 8/22/2022 at 8:14 AM, for a late entry for 8/21/2022 at 10:55 AM, revealed .[Resident #5] resting in bed with no apparent distress noted at this time. vitals stable .Able to make wants and needs known This Nurses' Note was created 27 hours and 29 minutes after Resident #5 had been readmitted back to the facility. Review of the Nursing Note dated 8/22/2022 at 7:18 AM revealed, L humeral [upper arm], swollen, warm to touch, sling placed. Review of the Nursing Note dated 8/22/2022 at 7:24 PM, revealed, Resident left arm, swollen, warm to touch, sling intact. Tylenol given for pain . The August 2022 MAR did not document this Tylenol had been administered on this date and time. Review of the Nursing Note created on 8/22/2022 at 10:55 AM, for a late entry note for 8/22/2022 at 9:34 PM, revealed, .[Resident #5] resting in bed left arm in a sling R/T [related to] fractured arm . Review of the statement by LPN #1 dated 9/8/2022 revealed, I did not witness [Resident #5] falling, she has never fell on my shift. Patient had a fracture from X-ray report, I got a report from out going nurse and I transferred patient to [named Hospital]. She returned to facility next day in the morning. Observations in the resident's room on 11/17/2022 at 10:05 AM, 2:53 PM, and on 11/21/2022 at 5:21 PM revealed Resident #5 was lying in bed, her bed was against the wall on the right side, the call light was in reach, no side rails were present, no odors were noted, and the resident appeared thin and frail. Observation on 11/29/2022 at 9:17 AM revealed Resident #5 was in bed, the head of her bed was raised, she was awake and alert, her call light was in reach. During an interview on 12/2/2022 at 1:40 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2 was asked about the incident with Resident #5's injured arm. LPN #2 stated, I came into work, Saturday morning, the CNA [named Certified Nursing Assistant #1] came to me and stated Resident #5 reported pain in her shoulder. The CNA #1 said resident had complained the previous night and an X-ray was supposed to have been ordered. I went in to assess her. I could see something was going on with her shoulder. I ordered x-ray through [named mobile xray company]. They came that day I believe and did x-ray of her left upper arm. We got an alert sent to us that it was a fracture. I contacted telehealth again that it was a fracture, and they gave order to send her to ER. We contacted the DON let her know fractured. [Named LPN #6] was asked to assess [named Resident #1] also. She was sent back to facility with a brace on left arm with orders to follow up with ortho [orthopedic doctor]. She did do follow up with Ortho. Surgery was not recommended. We did get statements from CNAs. Social usually interviews the residents around the incident. During an interview conducted on 12/5/2022 at 4:15 PM, CNA #1 was asked about Resident #5's incident. CNA #1 stated, I went in to dry [Resident #5] she didn't say nothing when I flipped her toward the wall then I turned her back toward me she said 'oh' I asked her what's wrong. [Resident #5] said 'I'm hurting, my arm.' I asked her what happened to you she said 'that girl beat the [expletive] of me' I ran out of the room for the nurse. I got [LPN #1] and told him [Resident #5] said her arm hurt that a girl beat the [expletive] out of her. So, we went into her room. He asked her and she told him the same thing. I said [named LPN #1] what you going to do before I leave. He said I'm going to order an x-ray. He said for me to go on home he would handle it. The next morning when I came in .I had the same section. I went in and asked [ Resident #5] how you doing today. She said her arm still hurt. I ran got the other nurse, [named LPN #2]. Told her to check on [Resident #5] her arm still hurts. Told her [LPN #1] was supposed to got an x-ray last night. [LPN #2] pulled the cover back and she said, 'I think her arm is broke'. I told her about telling [LPN #1] the night before and evidently didn't order the x-ray he said he was going to order. The left arm was purple in color at the upper arm. [Named LPN #2] went, got 2 other nurses and they came in the room. They said to get x-ray ordered. This was Friday and they ordered the x-ray. [Named Resident #5] stated the white girl beat her. She is sometimes oriented. She recognizes me and I talk with her regularly. This is the first time I ever heard her say something like this had happened. During an interview conducted on 12/6/2022 at 10:15 AM, LPN #2 was asked about the incident with Resident #5. LPN #2 stated, .I came in to work on 8/20/2022 at about 7:30. [Named CNA #1] came to me and stated she had reported to [named LPN #1] the night before that [named Resident #5] had been complaining of arm pain and she told [named LPN #1]. The resident was still complaining the next morning of arm pain and [named CNA #1] came to get me. I assessed the resident's arm. I got [named LPN #6] to come assess resident's arm. Her arm had bruising at bicep area of her arm and shoulder area didn't look right. We contacted telehealth and got order for x-ray and notified the DON and Administrator. It was a STAT order for x-ray. They came and done x-ray. We got a phone call and fax alert with the result of x-ray. I relayed the results to telehealth doctor, and they gave order to send her to ER [Emergency Room]. I believe it was on my shift I sent her out to ER. She was complaining of pain . LPN #2 was asked if Resident #5 told her what happened to her arm. LPN #2 stated, [Named Resident #5] told me the 'big white, fat, [expletive] shook' her, a CNA. I wasn't here the day before. [CNA #4] does fit that description. The same Nurse [LPN #1] came in the next day on 8/20 [2022], and I believe she was in the hospital when [named LPN #1], he came in, and I told him she was there . During an interview conducted on 12/6/2022 at 10:49 AM, LPN #6 was asked about the incident with Resident #5. LPN #6 stated, [Named LPN #2] came got me and wanted me to look at her [Resident #5's] arm. Her left arm was bruised and didn't look right. I said you need to call [named former DON] and tell her it's an injury of unknown origin, [named Resident #5] said 'that girl hurt my arm, she was stout as a bull and she hurt my arm' I told [named LPN #2] to call telehealth, family and doctor let them know. They came and did x-ray .I know she did go to hospital .Telehealth gave order for the x-ray. Telehealth will give us pain medicine, they have before . During a telephone interview conducted on 12/8/2022 at 9:35 AM, CNA #4 was asked about the incident with Resident #5. CNA #4 stated, The former DON called me and said she had a bruise on her wrist. She said a white woman had hurt her arm. There are only 2 white CNAs, me and .Possibility, I worked, I don't remember working with her that day . During a telephone interview conducted on 12/8/2022 at 12:40 PM, the former Administrator was asked about the incident with Resident #5. The former Administrator stated, I do remember that. An abuse incident should have been done [named CNA #4] she described, but she didn't work with her in the time frame. The doctor had seen her on Wednesday, and she told us on Friday .I spoke with MD [Medical Doctor] and FNP [Family Nurse Practitioner] one had seen her, and she didn't have any problem of pain. The person she described didn't work in that time frame. We looked at schedule to see what staff worked. Had dx [diagnoses] of fractures in past. We did see that she had comorbidities and we noted she had a turtleneck on. She could have been injured putting on that tight turtleneck. We concluded, unsubstantiated abuse, but she had a fracture from manipulating her arm, instead of intentionally hurting her . During a telephone interview conducted on 12/14/2022 at 8:44 AM, LPN #1 was asked about the incident with Resident #5's injured arm. LPN #1 confirmed his statement was true, as the surveyor read the statement dated 9/8/2022. LPN #1 stated, I was told by the nurse when I came on, she had a fracture per x-ray. No complaint of pain on previous day, I work on Friday, Saturday, and Sunday .The CNA did not mention any arm pain. It was next day I came back, and I sent her out. I think I gave her Tylenol, before sending her out . Resident #5 first said she was in pain and alleged abuse by a staff member on 8/19/2022 at about 7:00 PM, to CNA #1. CNA #1 reported the allegation to LPN #1 that night. LPN #1 did not document an assessment of Resident #5, did not do an incident report, and did not report the allegation of abuse. CNA #1 reported the same to LPN #2 on 8/20/2022 about 12 hours later .X-ray was obtained at 2:45 PM on 8/20/2022 (over 19 hours after the first complaint of pain) results showed left humerus fracture (results obtained over 26 hours after first complaints of pain). Therefore, Resident #5 suffered with the fractured area for over 24 hours with only two doses of Tylenol for pain and then was sent out to the hospital. This resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy for neglect of Resident #5. 4. Review of the closed medical record, revealed Resident #14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of COVID-19, Cerebral Infarction, Dementia, Alzheimer's Disease, Osteoporosis, Anxiety, and Vitamin D Deficiency. Review of the quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #14 had a BIMS of 4, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. The medical record revealed Resident #14 sustained unwitnessed falls on 9/26/2022, 9/28/2022, 10/4/2022, 10/6/222, and 10/27/2022. There was no documentation that Neuro Check assessments were completed per the facility's fall protocol. Review of the Incident Report dated 9/26/2022 revealed Resident #14 was found on the floor beside his bed, and the Mental Status and Predisposing Factors sections of the Incident Report were not completed. Review of the fall investigation dated 9/26/2022 revealed Neuro Check assessments were not completed per the facility's protocol. Review of the Incident Report dated 9/28/2022 revealed Resident #14 was found on the floor beside his bed and the Mental Status section of the Incident Report was not completed. Review of the fall investigation dated 9/28/2022, revealed the Skin assessment and Neuro Check assessments were not completed per the facility's protocol for unwitnessed falls. Review of the Incident Report dated 10/4/2022 revealed Resident #14 sustained an unwitnessed fall on 10/4/2022, and the Mental Status and Predisposing Factors sections of the Incident Report were not completed. Review of the fall investigation dated 10/4/2022 revealed the Skin assessment and Neuro Check assessments were not completed per the facility's protocol for unwitnessed falls. Review of the Incident Report dated 10/6/2022, revealed Resident #14 was found sitting on the floor with his bedsheet wrapped around his legs. Review of the fall investigation dated 10/6/2022, revealed the Neuro Check assessments were not completed per the facility's protocol for unwitnessed falls. Review of the Nursing Note dated 10/27/2022 at 6:15 AM revealed, .Resident observed sitting on floor by his wheelchair .stated he was attempting to walk .Staff reeducated resident about att [attempting] to ambulate without asst [assistance] .DON [Director of Nursing] notified . Review of the Incident Report dated 10/27/2022, revealed Resident #14 sustained an unwitnessed fall, and the Mental Status and Predisposing Factors section of the Incident Report were not completed. Review of the Neuro Checks assessment dated [DATE], revealed neuro checks should be completed every 15 minutes times (x) 4, every 30 minutes x 4, every 1 hours x 2, then every shift for 72 hours. Review of the fall investigation dated 10/27/2022, revealed Neuro Check assessments were completed on 10/27/2022 at 7:32 AM, 7:47 AM and 8:02 AM. Neuro check assessments were not completed per the facility's protocol for unwitnessed falls. Review of the Nursing Note dated 10/28/2022 at 7:07 AM, revealed .Therapy .went in res [resident's] rm [room] to perform exercise .Res complained of pain when therapy att [attempted] to get him up .Writer came and did a physical asst [assessment] of residents left hip .did not observe hip to be swollen redden [reddened] or discolored of nature .advised oncoming nurse .MD [medical doctor] notified and bilat [bilateral] x-ray . Review of the telehealth Progress Notes dated 10/28/2022 at 1:48 PM, revealed, .resident c/o [complained of] L [left] hip pain .had a fall on 10/27/2022 at 0630 [6:30 AM] .Patient highly confused. Nurse states patient normally gets up to eat and do activities but refusing to get out of bed .decreased ROM [range of motion] to L hip .ASSESSMENT/DIAGNOSIS PLAN NOTES .Pain in left hip .STAT xray left hip 2 views . Review of the Physician's Order dated 10/29/2022 revealed a bilateral hip x-ray was ordered but was not entered into the electronic health record (EHR) as STAT until the day after the order was given. Review of the Nursing Note dated 10/29/2022 at 3:09 PM, revealed Resident #14's x-ray was completed, and the results were pending. Review of the Nursing Note dated 10/31/2022 at 9:30 AM, revealed the x-ray results were received and Resident #14 had a left subcapital hip fracture (fracture in the neck of the thighbone) with moderate displacement, the provider was made aware and gave an order to send the resident to the emergency room. Review of the Nursing Note dated 10/31/2022 at 10:25 AM, revealed Resident #14 was transported to the emergency room for treatment; 4 days after the unwitnessed fall, and 3 days after the resident complained of pain to the Physical Therapist and was unable to stand on his left leg. During an interview conducted on 11/22/2022 at 12:16 PM, LPN #2 confirmed she worked 10/28/2022, the day following Resident #14's fall. LPN #2 stated, .Friday [10/28/2022] morning I come [came] back in to work and was told .he was complaining of pain and refusing to get up .[named LPN #3] said he had called [named telephonic physician's group], notified the RP [responsible party] .was just needing help getting the x-ray ordered through the mobile x-ray company .he said he needed help calling, and we don't call, we do it all online .left the nurses' station to go to the other one to get our password to be able to do that .the password wasn't valid and I couldn't log on to [named the mobile x-ray site] .when [named LPN #6] come in I asked her for the password so we could get it ordered .[named LPN #6] took over the whole situation . During an interview conducted on 11/23/2022 at 9:39 AM, the Physical Therapist stated, .[On 10/28/2022] went in to do his [Resident #14] treatment, he had been able to sit, stand and transfer .he couldn't stand .because of pain .went and found [named LPN #3] .walked down with me and did assess him .moaned and verbally complained about his left hip which was uncharacteristic of him .he would move his right side and say see no pain here, it's [pain] just right here .indicated his left upper leg . The Physical Therapist confirmed LPN #3 said he was going to notify the physician and obtain an order for an x-ray. During an interview on 12/1/2022 at 12:00 PM, the Medical Director confirmed that facility staff should fully follow physician's orders and should have followed up on Resident 14's STAT x-ray, and not have waited until almost 2 days after the x-ray was obtained. During an interview conducted on 12/2/2022 at 1:28 PM, LPN #2 confirmed that she contacted the telephonic physician's group through a facetime visit and obtained an order for a bilateral hip x-ray. LPN #2 stated, .I let [named LPN #6] know .she facilitated that and ordered it through [named mobile x-ray company] . LPN #2 confirmed she was not sure if she told LPN #6 the bilateral hip x-ray order was supposed to be entered STAT. LPN #2 was asked when came in on 10/29/2022, did she receive in report that the x-rays had not yet been obtained. LPN #2 stated, Yes, [named LPN #10] said .they weren't going to be able to come out .but would be out first thing in the morning [10/29/2022] . LPN #2 was asked what she did next. LPN #2 stated, I administered prn [as needed] pain medication that I didn't document . LPN #2 confirmed that she did not attempt to contact the mobile radiology company, the nurse practitioner, or the doctor when the x-ray was not obtained STAT as ordered. During an interview on 12/5/2022 at 4:09 PM, LPN #4 confirmed the facility's protocol when a resident fell included a fall risk assessment, pain assessment, skin assessment, and if the fall was unwitnessed, neurochecks were required. LPN #4 confirmed every section of the Incident Report should be completed following a resident's fall. During an interview conducted on 12/6/2022 at 9:51 AM, LPN #2 was asked the facility's protocol for resident falls. LPN #2 stated, .That seems like it has changed some over the years, when I first started working it seems like we would complete a pain and skin assessment .seems like it is no longer required .when you ask upper management .I've done my incident report, I've contacted telehealth and ask what else I need to do .they say oh well that's fine . LPN #2 was asked who she meant by upper management and she stated, [Named former Director of Nursing (DON)]. LPN #2 was asked if there was a policy or protocol on falls that instructed staff which assessments should be completed. LPN #2 stated, I don't know. I would like to assume that there is somewhere, where I couldn't tell you. LPN #2 was asked was she was uncertain what protocol to follow when a resident falls. LPN #2 stated, Yes .because it may or may not change depending on our DON or Administrator at the time .we can never keep an Administrator or DON .typically the nurse it happens on should complete all of that .your neurochecks if it's unwitnessed .the nurse here when it happens is responsible for ensuring all of that is complete . LPN #2 was asked the protocol for an unwitnessed fall and stated, Incident report, neurochecks .you start under the assessment tab in the chart .will set up its own schedule you have to follow for 72 hours .the time frames are triggered but you have to trigger it [Neuro Check assessments] initially .a lot of times I try to do the pain assessment even though it may not be required right now. I know that it has been in the past . LPN #2 confirmed that the former DON told her the pain assessment was no longer required when a resident had fallen. LPN #2 confirmed that a pain assessment and skin assessment were required to be completed for each fall prior to the former DON's administration. LPN #2 confirmed that the facility's protocol for Neuro Check assessments should have been followed for Resident #14's unwitnessed falls that occurred on 9/26/2022, 9/28/2022, 10/4/2022, 10/6/2022, and 10/27/2022. Resident #14 fell multiple times, and the post fall protocol was not followed by staff. Then he had a fall on 10/27/2022, complained of pain on 10/28/2022, the xray was not completed STAT as ordered, and xrays results were not obtained until 10/31/2022, revealing a left hip fracture. Therefore, Resident #14 suffered with the untreated fractured hip for 4 days, when the facility failed to follow the fall protocol and plan of care. This resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy for Resident #14. The surveyors verified the Removal Plan through review of root-cause analysis, in-services, audits and staff interview conducted: Governing Body re-educated the DON of notification to Primary Care Physician (PCP) with changes of condition, review of 24/72 Hour Shift Report in Clinical Startup. Surveyors verified by review of in-services and interviews. Governing Body educated community Leadership and Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) on Clinical Start up to be conducted Monday thru Friday DON/Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON)/Staff Development Coordinator (SDC)/Unit Managers (UM). Incidents and changes of condition are to be identified and followed through until stabilized to include PCP and Responsible Party (RP) notification. Surveyors verified staff interviews and in-services. Governing Body/Administrator (Admin)/DON/SDC initiated education and on-going to licensed nurses on Shift Report, Notification of Change in Condition, to include new onset or worsening of pain, on Admission, Quarterly, and Significant Change. Training included licensed staff were educated that residents are to receive treatment and care within professional standards of practice, person-centered care to honor resident's choice. Example: A. An accident involving the resident which results in injury and has the potential for requiring physician intervention; B. A significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status, including a deterioration in health, mental, or psychosocial status in either life threatening conditions or clinical complications ; C. A need to alter the resident's medical treatment significantly; D. A need to transfer the resident to a hospital/treatment center; E. A discharge without proper medical authority; and/or F. Instructions to notify the physician of changes in the resident's condition. STAT orders should be followed within the 4 hour time frame, if provider cannot (lab, xray) perform, licensed nurse to notify provider of delay for further treatment orders. Surveyors verified by review of in-services and interviews. Governing body to educate community leadership and department heads/IDT to include Medical Director re: QAPI and Ad Hoc QAPI related to Quality of Care issues. Surveyors verified by review of QAPI minutes. Surveyors varied by review of QAPI minutes and staff interviews. DON/ADON/SDC/UM and licensed staff re-educated to utilize the PointClickCare Clinical Communication Portal to identify residents requiring follow up documentation, labs, xrays, appointments. Surveyors verified by review of in-services. DON/SDC/ICP/UM/HR will educate new licensed staff regarding Quality of Care concerns F684. Surveyors verified by review of new hire in services. QAPI will be held again 12/8/22 with Governing Body to discuss deficiency, education, systemic changes, and monitoring moving forward. Surveyors verified by review of QAPI minutes and forms for monitoring.
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, facility investigation review, review of time detail reports, review of daily assignment sheets, review ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, facility investigation review, review of time detail reports, review of daily assignment sheets, review of Safety Check logs, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a safe environment for 5 of 11 sampled residents (Resident #1, #2, #3, #4, and #14) reviewed for resident-to-resident altercations and accident hazards. The facility's failure to ensure a safe environment resulted in Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) when the facility failed to provide 1 on 1 supervision for Resident #1, a severely cognitively impaired resident with known combative and aggressive behaviors, which resulted in resident-to-resident altercations between resident #1 and Residents #2, #3, and #4 on 3 different occasions; and when the facility failed to follow their policy for post-fall assessments when Resident #14 sustained 4 falls with no completion of the post-fall assessments, and then sustained a 5th fall on 10/27/2022, which resulted in a left hip fracture. Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) is a situation in which the provider's noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation has caused, or is likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to a resident. The Interim Administrator and Interim Director of Nursing (IDON) were notified of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 11/21/2022 at 5:43 PM, in the Conference Room. The Interim Administrator and Regional [NAME] President were notified of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) for a second Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) for F-689 on 12/7/2022 at 5:32 PM, in the Conference Room. The facility was cited F-689 at a scope and severity of J, which is Substandard Quality of Care. A partial extended survey was conducted from 12/12/2022 through 12/13/2022. The IJ was effective from 8/19/2022 through 12/13/2022. An acceptable Removal Plan, which removes the immediacy of the jeopardy, was received on 12/13/2022 at 10:42 PM, and was validated onsite by the surveyors on 12/14/2022, through policy review, review of education records, and staff interviews. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Unmanageable Residents ., dated 8/2021, revealed .Each resident will be provided with a safe place of residence .Should a resident's behavior become abusive, hostile, assaultive, or unmanageable in any way that would jeopardize his or her safety or the safety of others, the Nurse Supervisor/Charge Nurse must immediately .Provide for the safety of all concerned .Complete documentation of the incident must be recorded in the resident's medical record and an incident report must be filed with the Administrator . Review of the facility's policy titled, Accidents, dated 8/2022, revealed .Our facility strives to make the environment as free from accident hazards as possible. Resident safety and supervision and assistance to prevent accidents are facility-wide priorities .Safety risks and environmental hazards are identified on an ongoing basis through a combination of employee training, employee monitoring, and reporting processes .and a facility-wide commitment to safety at all levels of the organization, including staff, residents, and families .Data will be utilized to the extent available to identify potential hazards, risks, and solutions related to safety issues within the community .staff shall monitor interventions to mitigate accident hazards in the facility and modify as necessary .Resident supervision is a core component of the systems approach to safety .type and frequency of resident supervision is determined by the individual resident's assessed needs and identified hazards in the environment .Resident to Resident Altercations .Review as potential abusive situation, including the identification of .willful .Assess for need for additional or adequate supervision based upon a history of aggressive behaviors which may disrupt or annoy others .repetitive behaviors .address potential underlying issues which may lead to such behavior .address community process for appropriate supervision including .adequate staffing levels for services to those with dementia or history of trauma .Providing safe supervision when required . Review of the facility's policy titled, .Assessing Falls and Their Causes ., dated 5/2022, revealed .If a resident has just fallen, or is found on the floor without witness to the event, nursing staff will record vital signs and evaluate for possible injuries to the head, neck, spine, and extremities .If there is evidence of a significant injury such as a fracture or bleeding, nursing staff will provide appropriate first aid .Once an assessment rules out significant injury, nursing staff will help the resident to a comfortable sitting, lying, or standing position, and then document relevant details .Attending Physician and family in an appropriate time frame .a fall results in a significant injury or condition change .Nursing staff will observe for delayed complications of a fall for approximately 48 hours after an observed or suspected fall, and will document findings in the medical record .Documentation will include any observed signs or symptoms of pain .deformity, and/or decreased mobility; and any changes in level of responsiveness/consciousness and overall function .An incident report must be completed for resident falls . Review of the facility's policy titled, .Behavior Assessment and Monitoring, dated 11/2022, revealed .Problematic behavior will be identified and managed appropriately .The staff will identify, document, and inform the physician about an individual's mental status, behavior, and cognition, including .changes in behavior .Management .The staff will identify and discuss with the practitioner situations where non-pharmacologic approaches are indicated, and will institute such measures to the extent possible . 2. Review of the medical record, revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of Schizophrenia, Dementia with Mood Disturbance/Behavioral Disturbance/Psychotic Disturbance, Chronic Kidney Disease, Conversion Disorder with Seizures, Hypertension, and Chronic Hepatitis C. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 00, which indicated severe cognitive impairment, exhibited wandering behaviors daily, and required extensive to total assistance of staff for all activities of daily living (ADLs) except eating, for which he required supervision with setup help only. A. Review of the Incident Report dated 8/21/2022, revealed .resident [Resident #1] foot accidentally ran over by another resident [Resident #2] who is blind .resident [Resident #1] .[hit] resident [Resident #2] in wheelchair on the back of the head with an open hand . Review of a Nursing Note dated 8/21/2022, revealed .resident [Resident #1] had hit another resident [Resident #2] softly on the head due to being run over by wheelchair. Resident [Resident #2] in wheelchair is blind and didn't see resident [Resident #1] . B. Review of an Incident Report dated 8/28/2022 at 6:56 PM, revealed .nurse was called to dayroom by CNA [Certified Nursing Assistant] stating there was blood on the floor. [Named Resident #1] was observed Lying on floor with hands under head in sleeping position. [Named Resident #2] was observed sitting in WC [wheelchair] with small amount of blood noted from lower lip. [Named Resident #1] had small scratch noted to face L [left] of nose. [Named Resident #1] was assisted to chair by nurse and [named Resident #2] was supervised in dayroom. Residents asked what happened and neither resident was able to say what happened .first aide administered .Abrasion .face . Review of the Staff Interview/Statement Sheet dated 8/28/2022, revealed .Upon come'n [coming] on shift I was looking for CNA to get report. When looking in the dayroom [named Resident #1] was on the floor, [named Resident #2] was in his wheelchair he had [named Resident #1] by the arm, I notify [notified] the nurse that [named Resident #1] was on the floor, and there was blood on the floor. The statement was signed by CNA #4. Review of the Weekly Skin Evaluation for Resident #1 dated 8/28/2022, revealed .small scratch observed to face to L [left] of nose . The facility was unable to provide any additional statements obtained from staff working that shift. The facility was unable to provide evidence that Resident #2 received testing after his possible exposure to a communicable disease following the incident with Resident #1, who has Chronic Hepatitis C. C. Review of the Incident Report dated 9/7/2022, revealed the report was incomplete and did not give any details regarding an incident that occurred between Resident #1 and Resident #3 on 9/7/2022. Review of a Staff Interview/Statement Sheet dated 9/7/2022, revealed .On September 7, 2022 at approximately 6:55 pm [PM] I [CNA #5] was giving end of shift report to [named CNA #6] when the resident [named Resident #3] walked in the direction of resident [named Resident #1]. [Named Resident #1] was sitting in the chair and immediately reach [reached] up with a closed fist and struck [named Resident #3] in the jaw .left side .[named CNA #6] stepped in between [named Resident #1] and [named Resident #3]. I took [named Resident #3] to a safe area. After making sure [named Resident #3] was in a safe area, we both reported the incident to the nurse [named LPN #3] . D. Review of an Incident Audit Report dated 9/7/2022, revealed .Incident Description .09/07/2022 .20:45 [8:45 PM] .Writer [LPN #3] standing at med [medication] cart passing medication when writer observed res [Resident #1] walking up behind res [Resident #4] .Res [Resident #1] struck res [Resident #4] .in the rear right side of his neck with a closed fist. Writer immediately jumped in between the residents and redirected res .[Resident #1] .away from res [Resident #4] .Writer walked down to his [Resident #1] room and put cna [CNA] as one on one with res. Writer went back and assessed resident [Resident #4], Res [Resident #4] had no obvious signs of injury and made no faces of pain or any complaints . Review of the quarterly MDS dated [DATE], revealed Resident #1 had a BIMS of 99, which indicated resident inability to complete the interview, physical behavioral symptoms toward others on 4-6 days, verbal behavioral symptoms toward others on 1-3 days, and behavioral symptoms toward himself on 1-3 days of the 7-day lookback period. Review of the Nursing Note dated 9/8/2022 at 9:00 AM, revealed .Resident [Resident #1] was transported to [named hospital] for a psychiatric evaluation r/t [related/to] physical altercation with another resident . Review of Resident #1's Care Plan revised 9/9/2022, revealed .Potential for injury to self or others r/t [related to] impaired mental and physical status and aggressiveness, combative and resistive behaviors .9/9/22 [2022] .One on one supervision and care . Review of the Nursing Note dated 9/9/2022 at 1:10 AM, revealed .Resident arrived back to facility. Review of the Safety Check Logs for Resident #1 beginning 9/7/2022 through 11/17/2022, revealed 1 on 1 monitoring documentation for following days were missing: a. 9/17/2022-all day b. 9/21/2022-all day c. 9/23/2022-all day d. 9/24/2022-all day e. 9/25/2022-all day f. 9/26/2022-all day g. 10/22/2022-from 7:00 AM through 7:00 PM h. 10/24/2022-from 7:00 AM through 7:00 PM i. 11/1/2022-from 3:00 AM through 7:00 AM j. 11/5/2022-from 7:00 AM through 11:59 PM k. 11/6/2022-all day l. 11/10/2022-all day Review of the outcome of the facility's investigation into the resident-to-resident altercations that occurred between Resident #1 and Resident #3, and Resident #1 and Resident #4, dated 9/15/2022, revealed .Our investigations outcome has revealed that [named Resident #1] needs indefinite 1:1 [1 on 1] monitoring . Review of the Nursing Note dated 9/20/2022 at 5:17 AM, revealed .Res [Resident #1] sleep [asleep] most of shift .Res did get up and wonder [wander] periodically and push on exit door handles. No one on one personnel avail [available] for res and staff safety. DON notified . Review of the Nursing Note dated 9/21/2022 at 12:20 AM, revealed Res [Resident #1] sleep most of shift, no behaviors noted .No one on one personnel avail for res and staff safety. DON notified . Review of the Care Plan revised 11/1/2022, revealed .Potential for injury to self or others r/t [related to] impaired mental and physical status and aggressiveness, combative and resistive behaviors . E. Review of the time punch detail dated 11/10/2022, revealed CNA #2 clocked in at 1:52 PM. Review of the Incident Report dated 11/10/2022 at 2:15 PM, revealed .Resident [Resident #1] observed laying [lying] in hallway floor on back with resident [Resident #2] .laying [lying] on top of him [Resident #1] .while on floor resident [Resident #2] was observed with hands around [named Resident #1] neck .Memory Impaired [checked] .Confused/Disoriented [checked] .Non compliance [checked] .Impulsive [checked] .Hallucinations [checked] .Decreased safety awareness [checked] .Delusions [checked] . Review of the Nurse Practitioner Progress Note dated 11/10/2022 at 3:02 PM, revealed .This writer heard what sounded like something that fell outside office door and upon inspection, resident [named Resident #2] .had his hands around another resident's neck [Resident #1] .[Resident #1] was lying on the floor and [named Resident #2] was .over him .[named Resident #2] stated shortly after that [named Resident #1] hit him on the back of his head .[named Resident #1] has been in supervision due to combative behaviors towards other residents and staff. He was not being monitored at the time of the incident and was in the hallway alone .Nurse .to initiate the process of transferring residents to Psychiatric facility for further evaluations due to behaviors above . Review of the Staff Interview/Statement Sheet dated 11/10/2022, revealed .I [CNA #3] was sitting in front of the dayroom charting when I heard the wheelchair hit the ground. I immediately went over there. I seen [saw] [named Resident #1] on the ground and [named Resident #2] hands were around his [Resident #1] neck hollering he pushed my chair, hit me in my head . The statement was signed by CNA #3. Review of the Staff Interview/Statement Sheet dated 11/10/2022, revealed .I [CNA #2] was just getting to work .putting my belongings up and used the restroom when I heard some fussing .came out the bathroom in the hall and there was [named Resident #2] on top of [named Resident #1] saying he [Resident #1] hit me [Resident #2] . The statement was signed by CNA #2. Review of the Staff Interview/Statement Sheet dated 11/10/2022, revealed .I [CNA #8] was in the breakroom having lunch when I heard a noise in the hallway. I went to see what was going on that is when I noticed [named Resident #2] on [named Resident #1]. [Named Resident #2] was saying that [named Resident #1] had hit him on the back of his head. [Named Resident #2] wheelchair had turned over . The statement was signed by CNA #8. Review of the daily assignment sheet for the secure unit dated 11/10/2022, revealed the staff assigned for 7:00 AM through 7:00 PM on the unit were LPN #6, CNA #2, CNA #3, and CNA #8. At the time the resident-to-resident altercation occurred only LPN #6 was at the Nurses' Station, and CNA #3 was on the unit. CNA #2 and CNA #8 were in the breakroom. No staff member was 1 on 1 with Resident #1. Review of the Physician's Order dated 11/22/2022, revealed .Ensure resident [Resident #1] is receiving 1:1 supervision .Review safety check log to ensure documentation completed as ordered . Review of the laboratory results dated [DATE], revealed Resident #1 was positive for Hepatitis C. Observation in the Resident #1's room on 11/17/2022 at 10:25 AM, revealed Resident #1 lay on top of the bed, was fully clothed, wore nonskid socks, and a staff member provided 1 on 1 monitoring. Observation in the secure unit on 11/21/2022 at 11:09 AM, revealed Resident #1 walked with 1 on 1 staff member, dressed in a gown, pants, and nonskid socks. Observation in the secure unit Day Room on 11/29/20221 at 9:16 AM, revealed Resident #1 sat in a chair, was fully clothed, his left foot was bare and he had a nonskid sock on his right foot. Staff was present for 1 on 1 monitoring. 3. Review of the closed medical record, revealed Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of Diabetes, Dementia with Psychotic Disturbance, Schizoaffective Disorder-Bipolar Type, Hypertension, Epilepsy, Chronic Kidney Disease, Depression, and Mixed Receptive-Expressive Language Disorder. Review of the annual MDS dated [DATE], revealed Resident #2 had a BIMS of 11, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment, with delusions and wandering behaviors on 3 days of the 7-day lookback period, highly impaired vision, and required extensive to total staff assistance for ADLS. Review of the Nursing Note dated 8/21/2022, revealed .resident was hit on the back of the head by other resident [Resident #1] due to accidentally running over his feet in wheelchair. Resident had no pain and just asked who did it. Resident [Residents] was [were] separated and both are calm . Review of the Nursing Note dated 8/28/2022, revealed .This nurse alerted by CNA there was blood in dayroom floor. Upon entering room this nurse observed resident [Resident #2] sitting in WC [wheelchair] with small amount of blood observed on bottom lip. [Named Resident #1] was observed lying on the floor with hands under head in sleeping position witheyes [with eyes] closed, small scratch noted on face to L [left] of nose. Residents separated and supervised at this time . Review of the Weekly Skin Evaluation dated 8/28/2022, revealed .small laceration noted to bottom lip with small amount of blood observed . Review of the quarterly MDS dated [DATE], revealed Resident #2 had a BIMS score of 10, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment, with no behaviors, highly impaired vision, and required extensive staff assistance for ADLs. Review of the Nursing Note dated 11/10/2022, revealed .Resident [Resident #2] observed laying [lying] in hallway on top of resident .[Resident #1] with hands around [Resident #1] neck. Resident noted yelling .he [Resident #1] .hit me in my head . Review of the Nursing Note dated 11/11/2022 at 5:42 PM, revealed Resident #2 was transferred to a psychiatric facility for evaluation. 4. Review of the medical record, revealed Resident #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of Alzheimer's Disease, Hypertension, Depression, and Dementia. Review of the quarterly MDS dated [DATE], revealed Resident had a BIMS of 3, which indicated severe cognitive impairment with no behaviors. Review of the Nursing Note dated 9/7/2022 at 8:33 PM, revealed .Reported by staff this resident [Resident #3] .was observed walking in dayroom towards resident [Resident #1] .as he was sitting in chair. Resident [Resident #1] .was observed hitting resident [Resident #3] in face with closed fist in left jaw .immediately separated. Resident [Resident #3] noted with redness to left side of face .new order given to send to [named hospital] for CT (computed tomography) scan . Review of the Head CT and the Maxillofacial CT dated 9/8/2022, revealed Resident #3 had no acute abnormalities. Review of Nursing Note dated 9/8/2022 at 8:17 AM, revealed .[Resident #3] returned to facility . Observation in the Day Room on 11/17/2022 at 10:21 AM, 11/21/2022 at 11:07 AM, 11/28/2022 at 4:17 PM, and 11/30/2022 at 9:39 AM, revealed Resident #3 sat in her wheelchair, was fully clothed, wore nonskid socks, and watched television (TV) with other residents present. Observation in the resident's room on 11/28/2022 at 10:27 AM, 12/2/2022 at 3:46 PM, and 12/5/2022 at 10:46 AM, revealed Resident #3 was in bed, her eyes were closed, and she appeared to be sleeping. 5. Review of the medical record, revealed Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of Alzheimer's Disease, Dementia with Behavioral Disturbance, Hypertension, and Protein-Calorie Malnutrition. Review of the quarterly MDS dated [DATE], revealed Resident #4 had a BIMS of 99, which indicated resident inability to complete the interview, with physical behavioral symptoms toward others on 1-3 days and rejection of care behaviors on 4-6 days of the 7-day lookback period, and daily wandering behaviors. Review of the Nursing Note dated 9/7/2022 at 8:42 PM, revealed .Writer standing at med cart passing medication when writer observed res [Resident #1] walking up behind res [Resident #4] .Res [Resident #1] struck res [Resident #4] .in the rear right side of his neck with a closed fist. Writer immediately jumped in between the residents and redirected res [Resident #1] .away from res [Resident #4] .Writer walked down to his room and put cna [CNA] as one on one with res [Resident #1]. Writer went back and assessed resident [Resident #4] .no obvious signs of injury and made no faces of pain or any complaints . Observation in the Day Room on 11/17/2022 at 10:25 AM, revealed Resident #4 sat in a chair, was fully clothed, and played with his pants drawstring. Other residents were present. Observation in the Dining Room on 11/21/2022 at 11:03 AM, revealed Resident #4 sat in a chair, was fully clothed, wore a hat, and nonskid socks. Other residents were present. Observation in the Secure Unit Hallway on 11/29/2022 at 9:14 AM, revealed Resident #4 sat in a chair, he was fully clothed, wore nonskid socks, his eyes were closed, and he appeared to be asleep. During an interview conducted on 11/17/2022 at 1:47 PM, CNA #2 confirmed she was scheduled to supervise Resident #1 on 11/10/2022. CNA #2 stated, When I called my supervisor to let her know I was running late .she said I would be in the Gardens [secure unit] with him . CNA #2 confirmed she arrived to work at about 2:00 PM. CNA #2 stated, .clocked in, put my belongings up in the breakroom .used the restroom in the breakroom, and we literally heard the commotion .run [ran] straight out the door .[named Resident #2] was on top of [named Resident #1] saying he [Resident #1] hit me in the back of the head .he [Resident #2] was just protecting himself .[named Nurse Practitioner] was already at the scene .we proceeded to separate them .let our charge nurse know . CNA #2 stated, He will get angry toward me to the point where I'm literally scared, and I have seen him get mean and holler at other residents or staff .I did see him hit one of our other staff members before .like a light switch he will be sweet one second and then just flip, you never know when he will get in that mood . During an interview conducted on 11/17/2022 at 2:12 PM, CNA #8 confirmed she worked the secure unit on 11/10/2022, and no one was assigned to provide 1 on 1 monitoring to Resident #1 until CNA #2 came in around 2:00 PM. During an interview conducted on 11/17/2022 at 2:20 PM, LPN #6 stated, .never know when he's [Resident #1] going to strike out .he hit me .out of the blue . LPN #6 was asked about the resident-to-resident altercation between Resident #1 and Resident #3. LPN #6 stated, .she would walk and cry, she was walking towards him crying, and he hit her. We put a CNA with him, and as they were walking him to go to his room .[named Resident #4] was in his doorway and out of nowhere he punched him in the back for no reason .he will be laughing or singing us a song, then the next minute he does it [hits someone], and it's not a light tap. It's hard for his weight . LPN #6 confirmed she was the Charge Nurse on 11/10/2022, she was at the Nurses' Station when the altercation occurred, and no one was providing 1 on 1 continuous monitoring of Resident #1. LPN #6 stated, .[named CNA #2] had talked to [named the Scheduler], and she said [named CNA #2] was going to be late .we just had to watch out for him as best we could . LPN #6 was asked if she asked for help when she found out CNA #2 would be late. LPN #6 stated, I did, I was like who is coming in .she [Scheduler] said she was going to talk to CNA #1 .to come sit with him until CNA #2 came in . LPN #6 confirmed CNA #1 never came to sit with Resident #1. LPN #6 was asked if Resident #1 was left alone at times. LPN #6 stated, Yes .we would just check [on him] . LPN #6 confirmed no one saw the resident-to-resident altercation between Resident #1 and Resident #2. LPN #6 was asked if Resident #2 was aggressive. LPN #6 stated, No, he's never .I mean he hallucinates and talks to voices, but for him to hit somebody, no .he's blind so he doesn't know who [named Resident #1] is, he can't see him .he's never hit anybody .this is like the 2nd incident between those two . During an interview conducted on 11/17/2022 at 2:37 PM, the Nurse Practitioner confirmed she was the first one on the scene when Resident #1 and Resident #3 had the resident-to-resident altercation on 11/10/2022. The Nurse Practitioner stated, .sitting here at my desk heard some commotion outside the door, sounded like something fell .[named Resident #2] had [named Resident #1] on the floor with his hands around his neck, the wheelchair he [Resident #2] gets around in had been turned over .he was mumbling something .has a speech impediment .but when he finally calmed down and got him back to his chair, he said 'he [Resident #1] hit me on my head .I'm tired of him hitting me' .got [named Resident #1] up and back to his room. Apparently, he had been unsupervised .he was in the hallway by himself .there was no one assigned to him that day . During a telephone interview conducted on 11/18/2022 at 10:59 AM, the Interim Administrator confirmed that Resident #1 had been left unsupervised the morning of 11/10/2022. The Administrator stated, .They did not have a specified person, the CNAs were tag teaming .he technically did not have a quote unquote person for that shift .just wasn't as efficient in making sure he was covered as it should have been . During an interview conducted on 11/21/2022 at 9:37 AM, the Interim Administrator confirmed she started shadowing the former Administrator on 11/7/2022 for half a day, then returned to the facility on [DATE] for the rest of the week. The Interim Administrator stated, I wasn't in the system .let them handle it [the resident-to-resident altercation between Resident #1 and Resident #2] .I was aware of it the day of .both of us [the Former Administrator and the Interim Administrator] were in the office together . During an interview conducted on 11/21/2022 at 9:44 AM, the Interim DON (IDON) presented the 1 on 1 monitoring documentation and stated, .incomplete documentation is here .these are all we have . The IDON was asked if the facility investigation included the incomplete 1 on 1 monitoring documentation. The IDON stated, Not that I'm aware of, I had to go pull them. The IDON was asked if they were all dated. The IDON stated, They are very random .they are not complete .I just collected what we had .obviously saw that was not being done correctly . The IDON confirmed each page should have been dated and signed by the staff completing the documentation. During an interview conducted on 11/21/2022 at 10:10 AM, the Scheduler confirmed that on the day shift there were 3 CNAs scheduled for the secure unit and that included a CNA for 1 on 1 with Resident #1. The Scheduler confirmed that the nurse on the secure unit would make the assignments for the CNAs and designate 1 CNA for 1 on 1 monitoring. The Scheduler confirmed that CNA #2 texted her and told her she would be late on 11/10/2022. The Scheduler confirmed that she told LPN #6 that CNA #2 said she was going to be late. The Scheduler stated, .I was on a cart working . The Scheduler was asked what her plan was for 1 on 1 monitoring on 11/10/2022, when she learned CNA #2 was going to be late. The Scheduler stated, .There's a Unit Manager back there, and there's a nurse, and we can all help out .that's the way it's supposed to be . The Scheduler stated, .Truthfully, I would say the 1 on 1 is not working .he is walking then hits a resident out of the blue .he could end up hurting one of them really bad not meaning to . During a telephone interview conducted on 11/21/2022 at 2:43 PM, LPN #3 confirmed that he was working on 9/7/2022, when the resident-to-resident altercations occurred between Resident #1 and Resident #3, and Resident #1 and Resident #4. LPN #3 stated, .It was right at shift change .one right after the other . LPN #3 confirmed Resident #1 was not in 1 on 1 at the time of the altercations, but was placed in 1 on 1 monitoring following the two altercations that occurred that day [9/7/2022]. LPN #3 stated, It wasn't decided to put him in 1 on 1 until we had to wait so long on him to be transported .I said look this guy can't just keep walking around here hitting people .they said they didn't have the staff . LPN #3 was asked about his documentation stating there was not staff to provide 1 on 1 monitoring of Resident #1. LPN #3 stated, That's correct .that was like my last resort of asking them over and over again and nobody was doing nothing [anything] . LPN #3 was asked if the former DON was aware. LPN #3 stated, She told me she would get somebody, or she would call the staffing person .but nothing ever happened . LPN #3 confirmed that when only 2 CNA's were scheduled, they assigned 1 CNA to the men and 1 CNA to the women, and the CNA assigned to the men was the one who would also provide 1 on 1 monitoring for Resident #1. LPN #3 stated, The rationale was he [Resident #1] was asleep through the night . LPN #3 was asked if there were times Resident #1 was left unsupervised. LPN #3 stated, Oh yeah, absolutely when she was making rounds .it's impossible, because that means she wouldn't have cared for anybody else .I knew that still wasn't adequate, so that's why I started documenting . LPN #3 was asked if it was safe for the other residents for Resident #1 to be left unsupervised. LPN #1 stated, Oh, absolutely not. During an interview conducted on 11/22/2022 at 11:15 AM, LPN #4 was asked how she as the Unit Manager insured the 1 on 1 monitoring documentation was completed. LPN #4 stated, I just went down there and kept checking to be sure they were doing the sheets .made sure [named former DON] was getting the sheets and they were aware . LPN #4 confirmed there were 6 Safety Check Logs that weren't dated, and she could not tell for which days they were documented. LPN #4 confirmed that she was unaware there was not a CNA available to provide 1 on 1 monitoring of Resident #1 on 11/10/2022 until after the altercation occurred between Resident #1 and Resident #2. LPN #4 stated, .I didn't even know the aide had come to work as late as she had .it happened during PAR [Patient At Risk meeting], and the nurse called me down there and told me what had took [taken] place .trying to figure out why it occurred .notified [named LPN #6] that anytime anyone needs to go to the bathroom .they need to find someone to relieve t[TRUNCATED]
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Deficiency F0726 (Tag F0726)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, job description review, staff personnel file review, Safety Check Logs, medical record review, observati...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, job description review, staff personnel file review, Safety Check Logs, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff were competent and proficient in practice to assure resident safety, to maintain residents' highest practicable well-being, to timely assess and report injuries of unknown origin, to supervise an aggressive and combative resident, to follow STAT (urgent, immediate or rush) physician orders, to follow up on radiology results, to administer pain medication, and to timely transfer residents to the hospital. The failure of the facility to ensure competent nursing staff resulted in Immediate Jeopardy for 4 of 18 sampled residents (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #5, and Resident #14) reviewed for abuse and accident hazards. Resident #1, a vulnerable resident with severe cognitive impairment, who displayed combative and aggressive behaviors and was care planned for 1 on 1 monitoring, was left unsupervised and had an altercation with Resident #2, who had moderately impaired cognition. Resident #5, who had moderate cognitive impairment, alleged abuse and complained of left upper arm and shoulder pain, the allegation of abuse was not reported until the following day, the injury of unknown origin was not assessed timely, and pain medication was not administered timely. Resident #5 had an oblique left proximal humerus fracture. Resident #14, who had severe cognitive impairment, complained of left leg and hip pain approximately 24 hours following a fall, STAT physician orders for radiology were not followed, the radiology results were not followed up on timely, pain medication was not administered, and the resident was not transferred to the hospital until 72 hours later. Resident #14 had a left Subcapital hip fracture. Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) is a situation in which the provider's noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation has caused, or is likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to a resident. The Interim Administrator and Regional Vice-President were notified of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 12/7/2022 at 5:33 PM, in the Conference Room. The facility was cited Immediate Jeopardy at F-726. The facility was cited F-726 at a scope and severity of J. A partial extended survey was conducted from 12/12/2022 through 12/13/2022. The Immediate Jeopardy was effective from 8/19/2022 through 12/13/2022. An acceptable Removal Plan, which removes the immediacy of the jeopardy, was received on 12/13/2022 at 10:43 PM, and was validated onsite by the surveyors on 12/14/2022, through policy review, review of education records, review of audit tools, and staff interviews. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Administering Pain Medications, dated 4/2021 revealed, .The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for assessing the resident's level of pain prior to administering analgesic pain medications .Be familiar with the physiologic and behavioral (non-verbal) signs of pain .Verbal expressions such as groaning, crying, screaming .Facial expressions such as grimacing, frowning, clenching of the jaw .Limitations in his or her level of activity due to the presence of pain .Guarding, rubbing or favoring a particular part of the body .Acute pain should be assessed every 30 to 60 minutes after the onset and reassessed as indicated after analgesic relief is obtained .The pain assessment consists of gathering both subjective and objective data .Conduct a pain assessment as indicated. The initial assessment is comprehensive and should follow the facility pain assessment procedure .Conduct an abbreviated pain assessment if there has been no change of condition since the previous assessment .Whether pain has improved or worsened since the last assessment .The general condition of the resident .Verbal and non-verbal signs of pain .Evaluate and document the effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions .Administer pain medications as ordered .Document the following in the resident's medical record .results of the pain assessment .medication .dose .route of administration .and .results of the medication . Review of the facility's policy titled Staff Competency ., dated 5/2022 revealed, .Nursing staff will demonstrate competency in skills and techniques necessary to care for the resident's needs, as identified through resident assessments and resulting plans of care .In-service training classes are conducted to provide employees with information concerning their position, methods and procedures to follow when implementing assigned duties, and to provide up-to-date information that will assist the employee, as well as the facility, in providing quality health care .At a minimum there should be competency demonstrated, at the appropriate staff level on the following topics .Abuse, neglect and exploitation policies and procedures .Dementia management .infection control .Person Centered Care .Effective Communication .Basic nursing skills .Pain Management .Identification of changes in condition .Staff competency in change of condition will be provided for RN [Registered Nurse], LPN [Licensed Practical Nurse], and Nurse Aides (CNA), which includes an understanding of how to identify, report and intervene based upon licensure category . Review of the facility's policy titled .Abuse Investigations . dated 5/2022 revealed, .Reports of resident abuse, neglect, and injuries of unknown source shall be promptly and thoroughly investigated by facility management. Should an incident or suspected incident of resident abuse .neglect or injury of unknown source be reported, the Administrator .will appoint a member of management to investigate the alleged incident .The individual conducting the investigation will, at a minimum .Review the resident's medical record to determine events leading up to the incident .Interview the person(s) reporting incident; Interview any witnesses to the incident .Interview the resident .as medically appropriate .Interview staff members .on all shifts .who have had contact with the resident during the period of the alleged incident .Review all events leading up to the alleged incident .Post validated allegations of abuse, the QA [Quality Assurance] team should evaluate the following .Immediate and ongoing training needs and staff competency as needed . Review of the facility's policy titled .Abuse Prevention Program, Investigation . dated 8/2022 revealed, .Reports of resident abuse, neglect and injuries of unknown sources shall be promptly and thoroughly investigated by facility management .Post validated allegations of abuse, the QA [Quality Assurance] team should evaluate the following .Changes that may need to be made to prevent further occurrences .Defining how care will be changed or improved to protect residents .Immediate and ongoing training needs and staff competency as needed . Review of the facility's policy titled .Pain Clinical Protocols and Guidelines dated 10/2022 revealed, .Pain management will be provided to residents who require such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's goals and preferences .Through established assessments, the nursing staff will identify individuals who have pain or who are at risk for having pain .This includes a review of each person's known diagnoses and conditions that commonly cause or predispose to pain .It also includes a review for any treatments that the resident currently is receiving for pain .The nursing staff will assess each individual for pain .whenever there is a significant change in condition, and when there is onset of new pain or worsening of existing pain .Through the assessment process, the nursing staff will attempt to identify the nature .characteristics such as location, intensity, frequency, pattern .and severity of pain .Staff will assess pain using a consistent approach and a standardized pain assessment instrument appropriate to the resident's cognitive level .The staff will observe the resident .during rest and movement .for evidence of pain .grimacing while being repositioned .The nursing staff will identify any situations or interventions where an increase in the resident's pain may be anticipated .ambulation .repositioning .Confer with the attending practitioner to help identify the extent to which underlying causes of pain can be addressed or reversed .Obtain orders for appropriate tests .x-rays as needed .Obtain orders for appropriate pain medications based upon the resident's current situation .PRN [as needed] doses should be monitored at time of request .Monitoring .PRN pain management response will be recorded post each dose given . 2. Review of the facility's Job Description, dated 8/2018 revealed, .Director of Nursing .Coordinates all departments relating to nursing. Accountable for all .training, and education of all nursing employees .Evaluates resident records to assure accuracy .residents are receiving optimal nursing care .Monitors lab, x-ray .services .Coordinates and delegates nursing orientations and on-going education for all nursing staff .Participates in in-service education .Responsible for supervising direction of resident care .Responsible for 24-hour supervisory nursing coverage of the care center by preparing schedules for nursing supervisors .Coordinates and delegates nursing coverage to appropriate personnel as necessary .Report accidents and incidents when they occur, including all complaints and grievances made by residents and/or families .Attend and participate in orientation programs, ongoing training and educational classes .Perform assigned tasks in accordance with facility policies and procedures .Must be able to communicate with all employees and give supervision and management direction .Thorough knowledge of state and federal regulations regarding long term care .Can demonstrate sound judgement, dependability, and good teamwork and communication skills . Review of the facility's Charge Nurse .JOB DESCRIPTION, dated 6/2021 revealed .Perform administrative duties such as the documenting of .nurses' notes, doctors' orders .reports, evaluations .charts, resident assessments and care plans .Report accidents and incidents when they occur, including all complaints and grievances made by residents and /or their families . 3. Review of the medical record, revealed Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Dementia, Diabetes, Osteoarthritis, Psychosis, Scoliosis, and Anxiety. Review of the significant change Minimum Date Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #5 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 8, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment, and required extensive assistance for activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of the Nursing Note dated 8/20/2022 at 8:00 AM revealed Resident #5 was administered Tylenol 1000 milligrams (mg) for her complaint of pain in her arm and shoulder by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2. There was no documentation LPN #2 conducted a follow-up pain assessment within 30 or 60 minutes following the PRN pain medication per the facility's policy. Review of the Nursing Note dated 8/20/2022 at 8:21 AM revealed CNA #1 asked LPN #2 to come to Resident #5's room to assess the resident's arm after she complained of pain to CNA #1. Resident #5 cradled her left arm to her side, stated that her arm and shoulder hurt real bad, and had limited range of motion (ROM). LPN #2 notified the Unit Manager, former DON, and telehealth, who ordered a STAT x-ray of Resident #5's left shoulder. Review of the CNA #1's witness statement dated 8/20/2022, CNA #1 documented, .I went in to dry [named Resident #5] turn her to the wall first, she didn't say anything turn [turned] her back toward myself, she hollow [hollered] out. I said what's wrong, she said Baby, my arm hurts. [I] Immediately went and found [named LPN #1], [LPN #1] was in the back Dining Room eating. I told him [Resident #5] said somebody jump on her then I told him she said her arm was hurting, so he got up and me and him went to her room. He check [checked] her arm, told her to lift her arm, she started cussing him out. I said what you gonna [going to] do, he said I'm gonna call for xray, so I left . Review of the Staff Interview/Statement Sheet dated 8/20/2022, revealed .This writer [LPN #1] did head to toe assessment on patient [Resident #5] .on 8/19/2022 resident denies pain and was able to raise extremities. No visible injuries noted . The statement was signed by LPN #1. Review of the Physician's Order dated 8/20/2022 at 8:29 AM revealed a STAT order for xrays of Resident #5's left shoulder, humerus, and elbow. Review of the Nursing Note dated 8/20/2022 at 2:45 PM revealed the mobile x-ray company completed the ordered x-rays on Resident #5 six (6) hours and 40 minutes following the time of the STAT physician's order. Review of the Radiology Report dated 8/20/2022 at 4:28 PM revealed Resident #5 had an oblique proximal humerus fracture. Resident #5 was not sent to the hospital for the oblique left proximal humerus fracture until 8/20/2022 at approximately 9:30 PM, over 26 hours after she first complained of severe pain in her arm and shoulder. The facility's hospital Transfer Form was dated 7/30/2022 at 9:30 PM. Review of the Nursing Note dated 8/21/2022 at 4:45 AM revealed Resident #5 returned to the facility with a sling in place to her left arm. Her left upper arm was swollen and warm to the touch. Review of the Nursing Note dated 8/21/2022 at 2:26 PM revealed .[Resident #5] resting throughout shift PRN Tylenol given for pain .Sling in place throughout shift . Review of the Nursing Note dated 8/21/2022 at 7:13 PM revealed .PRN Administration was: Effective Follow-up Pain Scale was: 0 . Review of the Nursing Note dated 8/22/2022 at 7:24 AM revealed .Resident left arm, swollen, warm to touch, sling intact. Tylenol given for pain . Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated 8/1/2022 through 8/31/2022 revealed Tylenol was only documented as administered to Resident #5 on 8/20/2022 at 8:00 AM and 8/21/2022 at 5:25 AM for the month of August. Tylenol was not documented on the MAR as administered on 8/21/2022 at 2:26 PM or on 8/22/2022 at 7:24 AM. Observations in the Resident #5's room on 11/17/2022 at 10:05 AM, at 2:53 PM, and on 11/21/2022 at 5:21 PM revealed Resident #5 was lying in bed, her bed was against the wall on the right side, the call light was in reach, no side rails were present, no odors were noted, and the resident appeared thin and frail. Observation on 11/29/2022 at 9:17 AM revealed Resident #5 was in bed, the head of her bed was raised, she was awake and alert, her call light was in reach. During an interview conducted on 12/5/2022 at 4:15 PM, CNA #1 confirmed that she worked the 7:00 AM to 7:00 PM shift on 8/19/2022, and when she went in to change Resident #5 shortly before shift change at 7:00 PM, the resident complained of left upper arm and shoulder pain. CNA #1 stated, .I asked her what happened to you, she said, 'that girl beat the shit out of me,' I ran out of the room for the nurse. CNA #1 confirmed that she got LPN #1 and told him what Resident #5 said and they both went into the resident's room. CNA #1 stated, .[Resident #5] told him the same thing .[LPN #1] said 'I'm going to order an x-ray' . CNA #1 confirmed that when she came in on the following morning 8/20/2022 she had the same section of rooms and when she checked on Resident #5 the resident told her that her arm still hurt. CNA #1 stated, .I ran, got the other nurse [named LPN #2] .told her to check on [named Resident #5's] arm .Told her LPN #1 was supposed to got [have gotten] an xray last night . CNA #1 confirmed that she and LPN #2 went to the resident's room and when LPN #2 pulled back the cover she [LPN #2] said she thought the resident's arm was broken. CNA #1 stated, .told her about telling [named LPN #1] the night before and evidently [he] didn't order the x-ray he said he was going to order . CNA #1 confirmed Resident #5's upper arm was purple in color. During an interview on 12/6/2022 at 10:15 AM, LPN #2 was asked about Resident #5's injury of unknown origin. LPN #2 confirmed that on 8/20/2022 at about 7:30 AM, CNA #1 told her that she had reported to LPN #1 the night before that Resident #5 had complained of left arm pain and still complained of pain that morning. LPN #2 stated, .I assessed the resident's arm .got [named LPN #6] to come assess the resident's arm. LPN #2 confirmed that Resident #5 had bruising at the bicep area of her arm and the shoulder area didn't look right. LPN #2 stated, We contacted telehealth and got order for x-ray and notified the DON and Administrator. It was a stat order . During an interview on 12/6/2022 at 1:44 PM, the Administrator was asked about the Transfer Form for Resident #5 which was dated 7/31/2022 at 9:30 PM. The Administrator stated, It [the Transfer Form] self-populates the same date on the next Transfer Form you do. He [LPN #1] did not insert the correct date. It [date of transfer] was 8/20/2022 . During a telephone interview on 12/14/2022 at 8:44 AM, LPN #1 confirmed his written statement from 8/20/2022. LPN #1 stated, .[Resident #5] No complaint of pain on [the] previous day [8/19/2022]. LPN #1 denied that CNA #1 reported to him that Resident #5 had arm pain. LPN #1 stated, .I sent her out [to the hospital]. I think I gave her Tylenol, before sending her out . Resident #5 sustained an injury of unknown origin on 8/19/2022 and complained of pain at approximately 7:00 PM. The nurse was notified of the resident's complaint and did not notify the physician or nurse practitioner of the resident's change in status or obtain an order for an xray, and did not notify the Administrator of the allegation of abuse. The injury of unknown origin was not followed up on by staff until 8/20/2022, the STAT order was not obtained until 6 hours and 40 minutes after it was given, and the resident was not transferred to the hospital until 25 hours after she first complained of pain. Resident #5 sustained an oblique left proximal humerus fracture and received only 1 dose of Tylenol for pain management within the 25 hours following her complaint. The facility's failure to ensure staff were competent to assure resident safety and to maintain residents' highest practicable well-being resulted in Immediate Jeopardy for Resident #5 when staff did not timely assess an injury of unknown origin, did not follow STAT physician's order for radiology, did not transfer Resident #5 to the hospital in a timely manner, and did not provide adequate pain control to a resident who suffered a fractured humerus. 4. Review of the medical record, revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Schizophrenia, Dementia with Behavioral Disturbance/Psychotic Disturbance, Chronic Kidney Disease, Hypertension, and Chronic Hepatitis C. Review of the Staff Interview/Statement Sheet dated 9/7/2022 revealed CNA #5 was giving shift report to CNA #6 when Resident #3 walked toward Resident #1 who was sitting in a chair. Resident #1 reached up and struck Resident #3 in the left jaw with his closed fist. CNA #6 stepped between the residents, CNA #5 took Resident #3 to a safe area, and the CNAs reported the incident to LPN #3. Review of the Nursing Note dated 9/7/2022 at 8:17 PM revealed LPN #3 was at the medication cart when he observed Resident #1 walk up behind Resident #4 and strike him in the rear right side of his neck with a closed fist. LPN #3 immediately redirected Resident #1 away from Resident #4, put a CNA 1 on 1 with Resident #1, then assessed Resident #4. Resident #4 had no obvious signs of injury and made no faces of pain or had any complaints. Review of the Incident Report dated 9/7/2022 revealed the Incident Report was incomplete and did not provide any details regarding the incident that occurred between Resident #1 and Resident #3 on 9/7/2022. Review of the Nursing Note dated 9/7/2022 at 8:17 PM revealed LPN #3 was at the medication cart when he observed Resident #1 walk up behind Resident #4 and strike him in the rear right side of his neck with a closed fist. LPN #3 immediately redirected Resident #1 away from Resident #4, put a CNA 1 on 1 with Resident #1, then assessed Resident #4. Resident #4 had no obvious signs of injury and made no faces of pain or had any complaints. Review of the Care Plan with a revision date of 9/8/2022 revealed Resident #1 had violent outbursts, altercations with 2 other residents, and was transferred to the hospital for a psychiatric evaluation. Review of the quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 had severe cognitive impairment, physical behavioral symptoms toward others on 4-6 days, verbal behavioral symptoms toward others on 1-3 days, and behavioral symptoms not directed toward others on 1-3 days of the 7-day look back period. Review of the Care Plan revised 9/9/2022 revealed Resident #1 had been placed in 1 on 1 supervision as an intervention for hitting other residents. Review of the outcome of the facility's investigation of the altercations that occurred on 9/7/2022 between Resident #1 and #3, and Resident #1 and #4 dated 9/15/2022, revealed facility staff determined Resident #1 should be placed in indefinite 1 on 1 monitoring until more appropriate placement could be found for him. Review of the Safety Check Log for the 1 on 1 monitoring documentation for Resident #1 revealed missing documentation for 8 full days which included 9/17/2022, 9/21/2022, 9/23/2022-9/26/2022, 11/6/2022, and 11/10/2022, and 4 partial days which included 10/22/2022 and 10/24/2022 from 7:00 AM through 7:00 PM, 11/1/2022 from 3:00 AM through 7:00 AM, and 11/5/2022 from 7:00 AM through 11:59 PM. Review of the Nursing Notes dated 9/20/2022 at 5:17 AM and 9/21/2022 at 12:20 AM revealed there was no staff available for 1 on 1 monitoring of Resident #1, and the former DON was notified. Review of the daily staffing assignment sheet dated 11/10/2022, revealed CNA #2 was scheduled from 7:00 AM to 7:00 PM. Review of the time punch detail report dated 11/10/2022, revealed CNA #2 clocked in at 1:52 PM. Review of the Incident Report dated 11/10/2022 at 2:15 PM revealed Resident #1 was found lying on the hallway floor and Resident #2 was on top of him with his hands around Resident #1's throat. Review of CNA #2's Staff Interview/Statement Sheet dated 11/10/2022 revealed she had just arrived at work, put her belongings away, and used the restroom when she heard a commotion in the hallway. CNA #2 confirmed that she observed Resident #1 on the floor in the hallway and Resident #2 was on top of Resident #1, stating that Resident #1 hit him. Review of the Progress Note dated 11/10/2022 at 3:02 PM revealed the Nurse Practitioner heard a noise outside of her office door, went out to inspect, and found Resident #1 lying on his back in the hallway with Resident #2 on top of him. Resident #2's hands were around Resident #1's throat. Resident #2 stated that Resident #1 hit him in the back of the head. The Nurse Practitioner documented that Resident #1, who was supposed to be in 1 on 1 staff supervision, was not being supervised at the time and was in the hallway alone when the incident occurred. Review of the daily assignment sheet for the secure unit dated 11/10/2022, revealed there were 4 staff members scheduled for the 7:00 AM through 7:00 PM shift, LPN #6, CNA #2, CNA #3, and CNA #8. At the time the resident-to-resident altercation occurred LPN #6 was at the Nurses' Station and only CNA #3 was on the hall. CNA #2 and CNA #8 were in the Breakroom. There was no staff member present to provide 1 on 1 monitoring of Resident #1. 5. Review of the closed medical record revealed Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Diabetes, Dementia with Psychotic Disturbance, Schizoaffective Disorder-Bipolar Type, Hypertension, Chronic Kidney Disease, Depression, and Mixed Receptive-Expressive Language Disorder. Review of the annual MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #2 had a BIMS of 11, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment, with delusions and wandering behaviors on 3 days of the 7-day look back period, highly impaired vision, and required extensive to total staff assistance for ADLs. Review of the Nursing Note dated 8/21/2022 revealed, .resident was hit on the back of the head by other resident [Resident #1] due to accidentally running over his feet in wheelchair. Resident had no pain and just asked who did it. Resident was separated and both are calm . Review of the quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #2 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status of 10, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment, with no behaviors, highly impaired vision, and required extensive staff assistance for ADLs. Review of the Nursing Note dated 11/10/2022 revealed, .[Resident #2] observed laying in hallway on top of [Resident #1] .with hands around [Resident #1] neck. [Resident #2] noted yelling .[Resident #1] hit me in my head . Review of the Nursing Note dated 11/11/2022 at 5:42 PM revealed Resident #2 was transferred to a psych facility for evaluation. During an interview conducted on 11/17/2022 at 9:15 AM, the Interim Administrator confirmed that Resident #1 was supposed to be in 1 on 1 monitoring on 11/10/2022, was left unsupervised, and that's when the altercation between Resident #1 and Resident #2 occurred. During an interview conducted on 11/17/2022 at 1:31 PM, CNA #8 confirmed she was working on 11/10/2022, but was on her lunch break when the altercation between Resident #1 and Resident #2 occurred. CNA #8 was asked who was on the hall with the residents. CNA #8 stated, A nurse was in the break room with me, he came out with me, I think it was another CNA [named CNA #4], I can't think who else was out there . CNA #8 stated, I noticed [named Resident #2] was on top of [named Resident #1], he [Resident #2] was hollering [named Resident #1] had hit him on the back of the head . CNA #8 confirmed she was very familiar with Resident #2. CNA #8 was asked to describe Resident #2's temperament. CNA #8 stated, He will not bother you unless you provoke him. During an interview conducted on 11/17/2022 at 1:47 PM, CNA #2 confirmed that she was running late on 11/10/2022, and did not arrive at the facility until approximately 2:00 PM. CNA #2 was asked what education or training the facility provided for monitoring a combative or aggressive resident. CNA #2 stated, .just to make sure we watched him and prevent any other incidents between him and any other resident . CNA #2 confirmed they had abuse inservices but no specific training or education regarding de-escalation or handling a combative resident. CNA #2 confirmed that when she arrived on the secure unit and went to the break room there was not a staff member sitting outside of Resident #1's room. CNA #2 was asked were there 1:1 monitoring documentation papers on the over bed table. CNA #2 stated, No, it wasn't there I had to ask for it . CNA #2 confirmed the facility staff had told her Resident #1 was never to be left alone, at any time. CNA #2 was asked was anyone in the hall when she entered the break room. CNA #2 stated, .[Named Resident #2] was in his wheelchair at the opposite end . CNA #2 was asked how long she thought she was in the break room. CNA #2 stated, I would say about 5 minutes .went in and put my stuff up, used the bathroom and washed my hands, heard the commotion and run straight out the door .[named LPN #5] .and [named CNA #8] .was on break. We all heard the commotion . CNA #2 confirmed Resident #2 was on top of Resident #1 and Resident #2 was saying he hit me in the back of the head when she arrived in the hallway. During an interview conducted on 11/17/2022 at 2:20 PM, LPN #6 confirmed she was the Charge Nurse and worked the secure unit on 11/10/2022. LPN #6 was asked where she was when the incident between Resident #1 and Resident #2 occurred. LPN #6 stated, I was at the Nurses' desk charting . LPN #6 confirmed that CNA #2 had only been on the hall for 10-15 minutes when the incident occurred and that no one was sitting with Resident #1. LPN #6 stated, .We had to just watch out for him to do the best we could . During an interview conducted on 11/21/2022 at 10:10 AM, the Scheduler confirmed that she had to sit 1 on 1 with Resident #1 at times, when they needed help. The Scheduler was asked did the facility provide any training or inservices on how to handle a resident in 1 on 1 monitoring. The Scheduler stated, No, not that I remember . During a telephone interview conducted on 11/21/2022 at 11:59 AM, LPN #3 confirmed that he worked the secure unit on the 7:00 PM through 7:00 AM shift, and there were several times the facility did not provide him with enough staff to provide 1 on 1 supervision of Resident #1. LPN #3 stated, .They said they didn't have the staff . LPN #3 confirmed the Unit Manager told him they did not have enough staff. LPN #3 was asked did the facility provide staff any special education for 1 on 1 monitoring. LPN #3 stated, No .it was just like grab somebody and sit with him .with [named Resident #1] you need somebody who understands his disability, his dementia, and triggers, and be proactive in stopping triggers .to keep him from becoming violent .if they had taken the time to do it [1 on 1 monitoring] right .they could've .[I] sat down with the DON and talked to her about it .I guess I just [expletive] her off .to me that was paramount . During a telephone interview on 11/23/2022 at 9:56 AM, CNA #3 confirmed that she worked the secure unit on 11/10/2022, when the incident occurred between Resident #1 and #2, that she was not scheduled to provide 1 on 1 monitoring of Resident #1 that day, that she was the only CNA on the hall at the time the incident occurred, and that she did not witness the incident. CNA #3 was asked did the facility provide education to staff on how to provide 1 on 1 monitoring. CNA #3 stated, I don't think so, I use my own judgement . During an interview conducted on 11/23/2022 at 11:38 AM, the Interim DON (IDON) stated, .No .there was no education provided [1 on 1 monitoring education] . The IDON was asked should education for 1 on 1 monitoring and how to complete the Safety Check Log have been provided. The IDON stated, Yes .there was obviously no protocol . During a telephone interview on 11/29/2022 at 4:30 PM, the former DON was asked how she ensured staff was competent to provide 1 on 1 monitoring of a combative and aggressive resident. The former DON stated, We have a [named computer] course on de-escalating patients and our log that they're checking on him to make sure and documenting . The former DON confirmed the de-escalation training would be found in the computer system. The former DON was asked what training was provided to staff regarding how to complete the Safety Check Log. The former DON stated, I think it's pretty self-explanatory . The former DON denied knowledge of missing dates, gaps in time, and missing signatures on the Safety Check Logs for Resident #1's 1 on 1 monitoring. During an interview conducted on 12/5/2022 at 9:55 AM, the Inter[TRUNCATED]
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Administration (Tag F0835)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

Based on policy review, job description review, and interview, Administration failed to provide oversight to ensure systems and processes were developed and consistently followed, failed to provide ov...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on policy review, job description review, and interview, Administration failed to provide oversight to ensure systems and processes were developed and consistently followed, failed to provide oversight of nursing staff, failed to identify the root cause of concerns identified in the facility, and failed to ensure systems and processes were developed and consistently followed by facility staff. Administration failed to provide oversight that established and implemented policies and procedures to ensure residents were free from verbal, physical, and sexual abuse. Administration failed to provide oversight that established and implemented policies and procedures to ensure residents' Care Plans were followed to ensure safety measures were in place for a resident with a history of aggressive and combative behaviors. Administration failed to provide oversight that established and implemented policies and procedures to ensure facility staff investigated abuse allegations thoroughly. Administration failed to provide oversight that established and implemented policies and procedures to ensure abuse allegations were reported timely to all respective entities. Administration failed to provide oversight that established and implemented policies and procedures to ensure the facility had sufficient numbers of competent staff to provide care and services to residents and to follow doctor's orders. Administration failed to provide oversight that established and implemented policies and procedures to ensure care was provided for Resident #5 who had arm fracture pain and Resident #14 who had hip fracture pain. These failures resulted in Immediate Jeopardy for Resident #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, and #14. Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) is a situation in which the provider's noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation has caused, or is likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to a resident. The Interim Administrator and the Interim Director of Nursing (IDON) were notified of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) for F-600 and F-689 on 11/21/2022 at 5:43 PM, in the Conference Room. The Interim Administrator and Regional [NAME] President were notified of the Immediate Jeopardy for F-684 and a second F-600 on 12/7/2022 at 5:31 PM, in the Conference Room. The Interim Administrator and Regional [NAME] President were notified of the Immediate Jeopardy for a second F-689 on 12/7/2022 at 5:32 PM, in the Conference Room. The Interim Administrator and Regional [NAME] President were notified of the Immediate Jeopardy for F-726 and F880 on 12/7/2022 at 5:33 PM, in the Conference Room. The Interim Administrator was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy for F-656 on 12/8/2022 at 10:07 AM, in the Conference Room. The Interim Administrator was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy for F-835 and F-867 on 12/13/2022 at 3:44 PM, in the Conference Room. The facility was cited Immediate Jeopardy at F-600, F-656, F-684, F-689, F-726, F-835, F-837, and F-880. The facility was cited at F-600, F-684, F-689 at a scope and severity of J which is Substandard Quality of Care. An partial extended survey was conducted from 12/12/2022 through 12/13/2022. A Removal Plan which removed the immediacy of the jeopardy was accepted on 12/13/2022 at 10:45 PM, and was validated onsite by the surveyors on 12/14/2022 through review of inservice education, root cause analysis review, review of audit tools, review of QAPI minutes, Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) meeting minutes, and staff interviews on all shifts. The facility's noncompliance at F-835 continues at a scope and severity of D for monitoring of the effectiveness of the corrective actions. The facility is required to submit a Plan of Correction for each deficiency. The findings include: Review of the facility's .Job Description, dated 8/2018, revealed .Director of Nursing .Coordinates all departments relating to nursing. Accountable for all functions, activities, training, and education of all nursing employees .Evaluates resident records to assure accuracy, care plans are current and complete and residents are receiving optimal nursing care .Monitors lab, x-ray .services .Works with administration in interpreting, maintaining, updating, and executing personnel policies, facility manuals and job descriptions .Coordinates and delegates nursing orientations and on-going education for all nursing staff .Participates in in-service education .Responsible for supervising direction of resident care .Responsible for 24-hour supervisory nursing coverage of the care center be preparing schedules for nursing supervisors .Coordinates and delegates nursing coverage to appropriate personnel as necessary .Report accidents and incidents when they occur, including all complaints and grievances made by residents and/or families, and immediately report any time a resident is observed leaving campus .Attend and participate in orientation programs, ongoing training and educational classes .Perform assigned tasks in accordance with facility policies and procedures .Must be able to communicate with all employees and give supervision and management direction .Thorough knowledge of state and federal regulations regarding long term care .Can demonstrate sound judgement, dependability, and good teamwork and communication skills . Review of the facility's Administrator Job Description dated 5/2021, revealed .Supervises, plans, develops, monitors and maintains appropriate standards of care throughout all departments in the nursing home. Manages staff at the facility .Supervise and promote guidance and support to department heads .Meet standard staffing goals and ensure state licensure and certification standards are met .Recruit, employ, and ensure adequate training of personnel in the facility .implement procedures and controls necessary to provide quality resident care .Recognize and respond to changes in residents conditions and report observations to nursing/medical staff .Determine staffing needs of the facility .Develop and improve staff competency through training .Direct various committees of the facility, such as care plan, infection control .quality assessment and assurance .Monitor procedures to assure compliance with the guidelines of state and federal regulations and facility policy .Review, resolve and report complaints and grievances made by residents, families .Develop and authorize the development of established universal precautions and isolation procedures, and review and monitor compliance by staff .Monitor the workplace for possible health and safety hazards .Audit documentation for errors to inconsistencies and make necessary corrections or document reasons for corrections not made . Review of the facility's policy titled, Facility Policies and Procedures dated 5/2022, revealed .To ensure that our facility's operational policies and procedures are maintained on a current basis, the Quality Assurance and Assessment Committee will review our operational policies and procedures and resident care policies .Affected staff will be informed of changes in our policies and procedures. Appropriate in-service training will be conducted when changes in resident care and/or other policies and procedures are introduced . During an interview conducted on 11/21/2022 at 9:44 AM, the IDON confirmed that she became the IDON on 11/14/2022. THE IDON stated, .[My] background is cleaning up nursing homes .not to leave until everything is back in compliance . The IDON provided the Safety Check Logs [1:1 monitoring forms] for Resident #1 and stated, .Incomplete documentation is here, these are all we have. The IDON confirmed that the 1:1 documentation was not included in the facility's investigation of the resident-to-resident altercation between Resident #1 and #2. The IDON confirmed there were dates missing from several of the forms. The IDON stated, They are very random, they are not complete .I just collected what we had .put them in order .obviously saw that [1:1 monitoring documentation] was not being done correctly . During an interview conducted on 11/22/2022 at 10:10 AM, the Interim Administrator stated, .We knew as a whole there was a problem .recognized when we had a morning meeting on Friday [11/11/2022] that 1 on 1 didn't happen in the morning .that was the day the former Administrator and the former DON was leaving .I came in on Monday [11/14/2022] .went back to Alabama on Tuesday [11/15/2022] and wasn't able to get back in the building until 1:30 on Wednesday [11/16/2022] .Thursday [11/17/2022 when the survey team entered the facility] was going to be my first day in the building to tie it all up and bring it all together . During an interview conducted on 11/22/2022 at 11:15 AM, LPN #4 confirmed she was the Unit Manager of the secure unit and that she was aware of LPN #3's documentation on 9/20/2022 and 9/21/2022 that staff were not available for 1 on 1 monitoring. LPN #4 stated, I was aware .and they [Administration] knew that. LPN #4 stated, .Several times I reached out over the weekend [to the former DON] with no response .things weren't getting taken care of .they [former Administrator and former DON] knew they was [were] leaving .at that point nothing mattered I would go in with my concerns . LPN #4 was asked were they aware of the times there was not staff for 1 on 1 monitoring. LPN #4 stated, Yes .they were absolutely aware, and they did nothing to try to get the Staffing Coordinator [Scheduler] to bring in extra people, none of that . During an interview conducted on 11/23/2022 at 11:38 AM, the IDON confirmed no documentation was found that de-escalation education, education on providing 1 on 1 monitoring of a combative and aggressive resident, or education on how to accurately complete the 1 on 1 monitoring form was completed. During a telephone interview conducted on 11/29/2022 at 4:30 PM, the former DON confirmed she became DON in July of 2022. The DON was asked if the Medical Director was made aware that there were times there was not enough staff to provide 1 on 1 monitoring of Resident #1. The DON stated, I don't think so. During an interview conducted on 12/1/2022 at 12:00 PM, the Medical Director confirmed he was never made aware that sometimes the facility did not have enough staff to provide 1 on 1 monitoring of Resident #1. The Medical Director confirmed that he was not made aware of the altercation that occurred on 8/28/2022 between Resident #1 and #2, and Resident #2's possible exposure to a communicable disease. During a telephone interview conducted on 12/1/2022 at 3:13 PM, the Regional Nurse Consultant (RNC) stated, .the 1 on 1 documentation, it should have been in POC [Point of Care, the place where the Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) document in the electronic health record (EHR)] .I wasn't aware until sometime in October that he [Resident #1] had been in 1 on 1 for this extended period of time . The RNC confirmed she was not aware that there were gaps, missed days, and missing times in the Safety Check Log (1:1 monitoring form). The RNC was asked if anyone followed up on the Safety Check Logs. The RNC stated, I know on one of my rounds I noticed there were several sheets on a clipboard, addressed with [named former DON] that those needed to be pulled and scanned into PCC [facility's electronic health record] . The RNC confirmed the former DON was supposed to follow up with the mobile radiology company to address the delay in treatment for Resident #14's hip fracture but did not know if the former DON actually did so. The RNC stated, .The communication between me and [named the former DON] was not good .always felt like she thought she knew more than I did . During an interview conducted on 12/1/2022 at 9:53 AM, the Interim Administrator stated, I talked to [named RNC] .They did an Ad Hoc [impromptu Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI)] meeting following Resident #14's delay in treatment] .the [former] DON that was here .sitting at her laptop typing notes, there's no notes in Abaqis [Quality Management System] .she's [RNC] going to recreate what they talked about to see what that looks like because they [former Administrator and former DON] screwed up .that STAT order didn't get communicated across the board . During an interview conducted on 12/2/2022 at 1:28 PM, LPN #2 confirmed there was an issue with obtaining STAT radiology services on the weekends. LPN #2 was asked did she make the former Administrator and former DON aware of the problems with radiology. LPN #2 stated, Yes .[they did] absolutely nothing . During an interview conducted on 12/12/2022 at 2:38 PM, the Interim Administrator confirmed that she was finishing the investigation on Resident #12 because the former Administrator and former DON did not conduct a thorough investigation into Resident #12's allegation of abuse. The Administration failed to maintain oversight, establish, and implement policies and procedures to ensure allegations of abuse are thoroughly investigated, and reported. Refer to F-600. The Administration failed to maintain oversight, establish, and implement policies and procedures to ensure adequate staffing. Refer to F-726. The Administration failed to maintain oversight, establish and implement policies and procedures to ensure behavior monitoring for residents. Refer to F-656, F-684, F-689, and F-867. The Administration failed to maintain oversight, establish, and implement policies and procedures to ensure an effective QAPI program was in established in the facility. Refer to F-867. The surveyors verified the Removal Plan through review of inservice education, root cause analysis review, review of audit tools, review of QAPI minutes, Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) meeting minutes, and staff interviews on all shifts: RVP (Regional [NAME] President) reviewed job description with current Admin (Administrator). Governing Body to provide education to new leadership (Admin/DON) for Clinical Startup. Educate and encourage community to utilize PCC (Electronic Health Record) to highest ability to include Clinical Communications portal to communicate resident needs/follow-up. Educate Admin/DON re: safe environment, following physician orders to include STAT (urgent) orders, addressing communicable disease, residents requiring 1:1 monitoring, and following resident's plans of care. The surveyors verified by staff interviews and review of in-services. Educate new clinical leaders for Clinical Startup on hire and as needed. The surveyors verified by review of the in-services, orientation training, and interviews. Educate leadership, Admin/DON, to follow up with Relias (Computer training system) training and new hire Onboarding to ensure training in complete prior to providing direct care. The surveyors verified by review of orientation training program and interviews. QAPI plan and Facility Assessment to be completed annually in December and updated as needed (reviewed quarterly) to assess educational needs. Surveyors verified by review of QAPI minutes and interviews. DON/Staff Development Coordinator (SDC) /Unit Manager (UM) to review 24/72 hour report and follow up with individual licensed staff for documentation improvement to include: safe environment, following physician orders to include STAT, addressing communicable disease, residents requiring 1:1 monitoring. Surveyors verified by review of audits and staff interviews on all shifts. Admin/DON will submit self-reports to Governing Body for review, recommendation, and guidance within 5 days post incident. The surveyors verified by interviews and review of facility self-reports. Admin/DON work will Mission Education Department for assistance in training. The surveyors verified by review of in-services and interviews. Community to work with Home Office for assistance in recruitment of staff. Surveyors verified by interviews. Admin/DON to be on weekly call with Governing Body to discuss issues/concerns and status of regulatory compliance with recent IJs. Surveyors verified by review of call logs and interviews. The facility's noncompliance of F-835 continues at a scope and severity of D for monitoring the effectiveness of the corrective actions. The facility is required to submit a Plan of Correction.
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

QAPI Program (Tag F0867)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

Based on job description review, policy review, document review, medical record review, and interview, the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to ensure an effective QAPI...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on job description review, policy review, document review, medical record review, and interview, the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to ensure an effective QAPI program that identified opportunities for improvement related to resident safety, infection control and competent staffing, and failed to implement performance improvement activities in order to provide a safe environment for residents, prevent the spread of infections and communicable disease, and ensure systems and processes were in place and were consistently followed by staff and administration, and ensure competent staff that practiced in accordance with standards of practice and facility guidelines and followed resident care plan interventions for safety. The QAPI committee failed to provide oversight that established and implemented policies and procedures to assure the facility was administered in a manner to use its resources effectively and efficiently. The QAPI committee program failed to identify the root cause of injuries of unknown origin. The facility failed to ensure cognitively impaired residents (Resident #5 and #14) were properly assessed and treatment was provided following accidents and injuries of unknown origin resulting in a fracture to Resident #14 's hip and a fracture to Resident #5's arm. The QAPI committee failed to provide oversight that established and implemented policies and procedures to ensure that a resident (Resident #2) was properly assessed and monitored following an incident of exposure to a communicable disease and the incident was reported to the Health Department. The QAPI committee failed to provide oversight that established and implemented policies and procedures to ensure that a resident (Resident #1), a cognitively impaired resident with a history of aggressive and combative behaviors, received 1 on 1 monitoring for safety as indicated on his Care Plan. Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) is a situation in which the provider's noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation has caused, or is likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to a resident. The Interim Administrator and Interim Director of Nursing (IDON) were notified of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) for F-600 and F-689 on 11/21/2022 at 5:43 PM, in the Conference Room. The Interim Administrator and Regional [NAME] President were notified of the Immediate Jeopardy for F-684 and a second F-600 on 12/7/2022 at 5:31 PM, in the Conference Room. The Interim Administrator and Regional [NAME] President were notified of the Immediate Jeopardy for a second F-689 on 12/7/2022 at 5:32 PM, in the Conference Room. The Interim Administrator and Regional [NAME] President were notified of the Immediate Jeopardy for F-726 and F880 on 12/7/2022 at 5:33 PM, in the Conference Room. The Interim Administrator was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy for F-656 on 12/8/2022 at 10:07 AM, in the Conference Room. The Interim Administrator was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy for F-835 and F-867 on 12/13/2022 at 3:44 PM, in the Conference Room. The facility was cited Immediate Jeopardy at F-600, F-656, F-684, F-689, F726, F-835, F-837, F-867 and F-880 at a severity of J. The facility was cited at F-600 at scope and severity of J, which is Substandard Quality of Care. The facility was cited at F-684 at scope and severity of J, which is Substandard Quality of Care. The facility was cited at F-689 at scope and severity of J, which is Substandard Quality of Care. The Immediate Jeopardy existed from 8/19/2022 through 12/13/2022. A Removal Plan which removed the immediacy of the jeopardy was accepted on 12/13/2022 at 10:45 PM, and was validated onsite by the surveyors on 12/14/2022 through review of inservice education, root cause analysis review, review of audit tools, review of QAPI minutes, Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) meeting minutes, and staff interviews on all shifts. The findings include: The facility's policy titled, QAPI Committee, Program Feedback, Data Systems and Monitoring . revised 10/2022, revealed .This facility shall establish and maintain a Quality Assessment and Assurance Committee (QAPI) that oversees the identification and handling of quality issues. The facility shall establish a system for program feedback, data collection systems, and monitoring, including adverse events .The primary goals of the Quality Assessment and Assurance Committee are .To oversee facility systems and processes related to improving quality of care and services .To promote consistent facility systems and processes and appropriate practices in resident care .To help identify negative outcomes relative to resident care and resolve them appropriately .To coordinate the development, implementation, monitoring, and evaluation of action plans to achieve specified quality goals .To coordinate and facilitate communication regarding the delivery of quality resident care .The committee will meet monthly at an appointed time .The Infection Preventionist shall report on the Infection Prevention and Control Program, include all Health-care associated Infections (HAI's) on a regular basis .The committee will oversee the development and implementation of actions to correct quality concerns and promote overall quality of care and services in the facility .Examples of actions that may be implemented to help address quality issues may include .Adverse Event review including, systematic identification, analysis which lead to corrective action .Educational training programs .Staffing changes .Sources may include .EHR [Electronic Health Records] .Incident Reports .Complaints .If a medical error or adverse event has occurred, initiate feedback and learning throughout the facility by .Education of the staff .The committee shall advise the administration of the need for policy and procedural changes and, as appropriate, monitor to ensure that such changes as implemented . Review of the facility's policy titled, Facility Policies and Procedures dated 5/2022, revealed .To ensure that our facility's operational policies and procedures are maintained on a current basis, the Quality Assurance and Assessment Committee will review our operational policies and procedures and resident care policies .Affected staff will be informed of changes in our policies and procedures. Appropriate in-service training will be conducted when changes in resident care and/or other policies and procedures are introduced . Review of the facility's Administrator Job Description dated 5/2021, revealed .Supervises, plans, develops, monitors and maintains appropriate standards of care throughout all departments in the nursing home. Manages staff at the facility .Supervise and promote guidance and support to department heads .Meet standard staffing goals and ensure state licensure and certification standards are met .Recruit, employ, and ensure adequate training of personnel in the facility .implement procedures and controls necessary to provide quality resident care .Recognize and respond to changes in residents conditions and report observations to nursing/medical staff .Determine staffing needs of the facility .Develop and improve staff competency through training .Direct various committees of the facility, such as care plan, infection control .quality assessment and assurance .Monitor procedures to assure compliance with the guidelines of state and federal regulations and facility policy .Review, resolve and report complaints and grievances made by residents, families .Develop and authorize the development of established universal precautions and isolation procedures, and review and monitor compliance by staff .Monitor the workplace for possible health and safety hazards .Audit documentation for errors to inconsistencies and make necessary corrections or document reasons for corrections not made . Review of the facility's .Job Description, dated 8/2018, revealed .Director of Nursing .Coordinates all departments relating to nursing. Accountable for all functions, activities, training, and education of all nursing employees .Evaluates resident records to assure accuracy, care plans are current and complete and residents are receiving optimal nursing care .Monitors lab, x-ray .services .Works with administration in interpreting, maintaining, updating, and executing personnel policies, facility manuals and job descriptions .Coordinates and delegates nursing orientations and on-going education for all nursing staff .Participates in in-service education .Responsible for supervising direction of resident care .Responsible for 24-hour supervisory nursing coverage of the care center by preparing schedules for nursing supervisors .Coordinates and delegates nursing coverage to appropriate personnel as necessary .Report accidents and incidents when they occur, including all complaints and grievances made by residents and/or families .Attend and participate in orientation programs, ongoing training and educational classes .Perform assigned tasks in accordance with facility policies and procedures .Must be able to communicate with all employees and give supervision and management direction .Thorough knowledge of state and federal regulations regarding long term care .Can demonstrate sound judgement, dependability, and good teamwork and communication skills . Review of the QAPI Immediate Action Plan dated 12/11/2022, revealed, QA Committee not completing AdHO [AdHoc (Impromptu)] [symbol for and] RCA [Root Cause Analysis] as indicated .What are the implications of not taking action .High Risk - Actual harm has occurred .Educate Dept [Department] Heads Re [Related to] QA, RCA, Adhoc .Educate staff about QAPI [symbol for and] how to get data to QAPI .Governing body to support/educate leadership . During a telephone interview conducted on 11/29/2022 at 4:30 PM, the former DON confirmed an Ad Hoc QAPI meeting was not conducted following the resident to resident altercation that occurred between Resident #1 and #2 on 11/10/2022, and the facility's inability to provide staff for 1 on 1 monitoring of Resident #1. During an interview conducted on 12/1/2022 at 12:00 PM, the Medical Director confirmed that a QAPI meeting was not conducted following the resident to resident altercation between Resident #1 and #2 that occurred on 11/10/2022. During a telephone interview conducted on 12/7/2022 at 4:14 PM, the former DON confirmed the incident where Resident #2 had possible exposure to a communicable disease was not taken to the monthly QAPI and an Ad Hoc QAPI meeting was not conducted following the incident. The former DON stated, I didn't know we were supposed to [take the incident to QAPI] . During an interview completed on 12/13/2022 at 12:42 PM, the Interim Administrator was asked how often do you have QA. The Interim Administrator stated, Monthly .in looking at the notes, one month was missed but I prefer monthly . The Interim Administrator was asked who attends the QA meetings. The Interim Administrator stated, Department heads .and the Medical Director and/or the Nurse Practitioner. The Interim Administrator was asked what topics were discussed in QA. The Interim Administrator stated, Each department has their things they bring, the DON looks at wounds, med errors .Infection Control nurse looks at that .nursing talks about weight loss, skin, nursing related, Dietary talks about diets, food preferences, Social .any discharges and reports to the Ombudsman, Activities covers volunteers, and resident council .MDS brings reports and we look at the Quality Measures .we are setting up to do our own inhouse surveys of staff, residents, families .any PIPS [Performance Improvement Plans], and follow up on those . The Interim Administrator was asked do you discuss falls, incidents, and accidents. The Interim Administrator stated, Yes ma'am .that would fall under the DON. The Interim Administrator was asked what would prompt an Ad Hoc meeting. The Interim Administrator stated, The IJs prompted an Ad Hoc meeting .It depends on the extent of the concerns .if a concern is brought up and it's something we feel like the whole team needs to be aware of, we would do it .if a concern that just addresses 1 department, I would probably just make that department aware . The Interim Administrator was asked would you do an Ad Hoc for incidents of abuse. The Interim Administrator stated, I typically haven't in the past, but now I'm second guessing myself .If I feel like if I could investigate it and get a good handle on it, I probably wouldn't .certainly if something substantiated, it would probably be more relevant .what we did with these .behavior related, I've asked my care plan team .talked to CNAs, asked them to go back and do another care plan meeting and reevaluate our interventions, expect our interventions to be more patient related .have put them in there in a way so the CNAs can pull them up and know the interventions . The Interim Administrator was asked if incidents, injuries of unknown origin, and allegations of Abuse were discussed in QA. The Interim Administrator stated, All reportables will be discussed in there .anything from the meeting before .the way QAPI works like December, you're really addressing all of November's stuff. The Interim Administrator was asked when a problem was brought before QA and a plan was put in place, who monitored to make sure the plan was effective, how often was it monitored, and if it was not effective, what do you do next. The Interim Administrator stated, Whoever would monitor would be based on the department the plan is addressed by .that dept head that particular concerns is related to .how often is often determined how that PIP is written .then as an Interim Administrator I would look at each person's PIP and discussing is this working or not working, and do we need to implement something different. The Interim Administrator was asked if the facility had an effective QA program. The Interim Administrator stated, I think the program is effective, so yes .I think it could be utilized more effectively, and that's what I'm hoping to be able to do . The Interim Administrator was asked do you think that QAPI program was being utilized adequately. The Interim Administrator stated, No ma'am . The Interim Administrator was asked who was ultimately responsible for the QAPI program. The Interim Administrator stated, .Me . The Interim Administrator was asked who was ultimately responsible for the safety of the residents. The Interim Administrator stated, Me. The QAPI committee failed to maintain oversight, establish and implement policies and procedures to provide adequate supervision of residents and to properly assess and provide treatment for injuries and reports of pain. Refer to F-600 The QAPI committee failed to maintain oversight, establish, and implement policies and procedures to ensure staff maintained residents' safety by following their plan of care for safety interventions related to aggressive behaviors. Refer to F-656 The QAPI committee failed to maintain oversight, establish, and implement policies and procedures to ensure the facility provided care to residents in accordance with professional standards of practice. Refer to F-684 The QAPI committee failed to maintain oversight, establish, and implement policies and procedures to ensure incidents of resident to resident abuse and accidents were prevented, residents were monitored, and care and treatment was provided timely. Refer to F-689. The QAPI committee failed to maintain oversight, establish, and implement policies and procedures to ensure nursing staff were competent and proficient in practice to assure resident safety, to maintain residents' highest practicable well-being. Refer to F-726. The QAPI Committee failed to maintain oversight, failed to establish and implement policies and procedures, failed to ensure the Administration consistently followed policies and procedures, failed to provide oversight of nursing staff, failed to identify the root cause of concerns identified in the facility, and failed to ensure systems and processes were developed and consistently followed by facility staff. Refer to F-835. The QAPI committee failed to maintain oversight, establish, and implement policies and procedures to ensure residents were properly tested after exposure to Hepatitis C, a communicable disease, and failed to ensure the exposure was reported to the Health Department. Refer to F-880.
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on the Center for Disease Control (CDC)'s Hepatitis C Questions and Answers for the Public, policy review, medical record ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on the Center for Disease Control (CDC)'s Hepatitis C Questions and Answers for the Public, policy review, medical record review, review of facility emails, and interview, the facility failed to prevent the potential spread of infection and communicable disease for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #2) reviewed. This failure resulted in Immediate Jeopardy when a Hepatitis C-positive resident (Resident #1) was involved in an altercation with another resident (Resident #2), and both residents were bleeding, which exposed staff and Resident #2 to potential contact with Hepatitis C-contaminated blood, when the facility failed to test Resident #2 for Hepatitis C following the exposure, and when the facility failed to report the exposure to the Health Department. Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) is a situation in which a provider's non-compliance with one or more requirements of participation has caused, or is likely to cause, severe injury, harm, impairment, or death to a resident. The Administrator and the Regional [NAME] President were notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 12/7/2022 at 5:33 PM, in the Conference Room. The facility was cited Immediate Jeopardy at F-880. The facility was cited at F-880 at a scope and severity of J. The IJ was effective on 8/19/2022 through 12/13/2022. A partial extended survey was conducted 12/12/2022 through 12/13/2022. An acceptable Removal Plan, which removed the immediacy of the jeopardy, was received on 12/13/2021 at 10:43 PM, and was validated onsite by the surveyors on 12/14/2022 through review of root cause analysis, in-services, audits, and staff interviews conducted. The findings include: 1. Review of the CDC's Hepatitis C Questions and Answers for the Public, dated 7/ 28/2020, revealed .The hepatitis C virus is usually spread when someone comes into contact with blood from an infected person .You should get tested for hepatitis C if you .Have been exposed to blood from a person who has hepatitis C . 2. Review of the facility's policy titled, Exposure Reporting and Investigating, dated 5/2022, revealed Employee exposure incidents to blood .or other potentially infectious materials must be reported to the community management as soon as practical after such incident occurs . Review of the facility's policy titled, Exposure Reports ., dated 5/2022, revealed An occupational exposure report shall be completed for all known employee exposures to blood and/or body fluids .Release of such information will only be on a need-to-know basis .For example, to the Administrator, Director of Nursing Services .and government officials, as required by law . Review of the facility's policy titled, Infection Prevention and Control Program . dated 10/2022, revealed The community Infection Prevention and Control Program is designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. The program covers all residents, staff .and others who provide care and services to residents on behalf of the facility .The Infection Control Committee is established to provide the oversight of the program .The Infection Control Committee shall oversee the internal community system for the preventing, identifying, reporting, investigating and controlling of infections and communicable diseases for all staff .and other individuals providing services .The program establishes facility-wide systems for the prevention, identification, reporting, investigation and control of infections and communicable diseases of residents, staff, and visitors .The community program will follow accepted national standards, e.g. [for example] CDC .Components of the program will include .Surveillance system .Reporting requirements .Environmental cleaning .Recording system .The Infection Control Committee may include .Administrator .Director of Nursing .Infection Control Coordinator .The Infection Preventionist will report monthly to the QAPI [Quality Assurance Performance Improvement] Committee . 3. Review of the medical record, revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Schizophrenia, Dementia with Mood Disturbance/Behavioral Disturbance/Psychotic Disturbance, Seizures, Hypertension and Chronic Hepatitis C. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed Resident #1 had severely impaired cognition, physical behaviors directed towards others on 4-6 of 7 days and verbal behaviors directed towards others on 1-3 of 7 days. Review of the Care Plan dated 4/8/2022, revealed .has mood and behavioral problems .displayed as combative behavior towards other resident and staff, agitation, anxiety or restlessness r/t [related to] impaired mental status .has potential for complications r/t hepatitis C . Review of the Nurses Note dated 8/28/2022 at 9:24 PM, revealed .This nurse was notified by CNA [Certified Nursing Assistant] that there was blood on dayroom floor. Upon entering dayroom this nurse observed [named Resident #1] lying on the floor with hands under head in sleeping position with eyes closed. small scratch noted on face to L [Left] side of nose. [Named Resident #2] was sitting in WC [wheelchair] with small amount of blood coming from bottom lip. [Named Resident #1] was assisted into chair in hallway by nurse and [named Resident #2] was supervised in dayroom . 4. Review of the medical record, revealed Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of Diabetes, Dementia with Psychotic Disturbance, Schizoaffective Disorder-Bipolar Type, Depression, and Speech Disturbances. Review of the quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #2 had moderately impaired cognition, was rarely or never understood by and rarely or never understood others, and had highly impaired vision. Review of the Nurses Note dated 8/28/2022 at 10:01 AM, revealed .This nurse alerted by CNA there was blood in dayroom floor. Upon entering room this nurse observed resident sitting in WC with small amount of blood observed on bottom lip. [Named Resident #1] was observed lying on the floor with hands under head in sleeping position with eyes closed, small scratch noted on face to L of nose. Residents separated and supervised at this time . The facility was unable to provide documentation Resident #2 was tested for Hepatitis C following the incident with Resident #1 on 8/28/2022. Review of an email provided by the facility dated 9/4/2022 at 12:02 PM, from the Infection Preventionist to the DON, revealed .Just wanted to follow up with you regarding the incident on the Gardens, notifications and order status for infection control purposes. The DON replied to the email that she had notified the Nurse Practitioner (NP), and the nurses on the floor should have ordered labs on both residents. Review of an email provided by the facility revealed the Infection Preventionist emailed the DON again on 9/5/2022 to report she had not seen any labs related to the incident or a progress note from the NP. The DON replied, I'll look into it. The facility was unable to provide documentation the possible communicable disease transmission was reported to the local health department. During an interview conducted on 11/28/2022 at 2:48 PM, the Infection Preventionist was asked what precautions should be taken for a Resident with Chronic Hepatitis C. The Infection Preventionist stated, Standard Precautions .make sure any blood, if blood is ever drawn, whether it be from lab or an incident, that all precaution and testing is completed, even of staff. The Infection Preventionist was asked if she recalled the incident on August 28th. The Infection Preventionist stated, .I can't recall that one specifically . The Infection Preventionist was asked if she knew if any precautions were completed. The Infection Preventionist stated, .it was not a witnessed incident, there was no explanation as to the source of the injuries, neither party could say what happened .I remember we did discuss assessing hands for breaks in the skin to see if that contact and transferal which there was none .I did not have access to the lab company that we used at that time, but labs were ordered. What all was included I could not tell you off the top of my head .They were supposed to have the same matching lab sets .I want to say [named the former Director of Nursing (DON)] was going to talk to .our Nurse Practitioner, but I can't say for sure .the Nurse Practitioner was supposed to do a follow-up assessment on both residents, post incident assessment and get the orders for the labs . During an interview conducted on 11/28/2022 at 3:45 PM, the Infection Preventionist confirmed no labs to assess for Hepatitis C were collected from Resident #2 following the 8/28/2022 incident. The Infection Preventionist was asked if the DON responded to the email. The Infection Preventionist stated, I didn't see anything, and I should have continued to press her. That's on me. The Infection Preventionist was asked if this incident should have been followed. The Infection Preventionist stated, Absolutely, and the risk of blood being involved. The Infection Preventionist was asked what process should be followed following an exposure to Hepatitis C. The Infection Preventionist stated, We notify our Nurse Practitioner, get the standard lab orders .with his [Resident #1] diagnosis, a hepatitis panel on both residents just to make sure, and just on this incident, I would have asked if she wanted to include RPR [Rapid Plasma [NAME]] .labs as well, anything that could be transmitted via blood especially with the situation being highly suspect, with not having a witness, and having 2 residents that can't tell you what happened . During an interview conducted on 11/29/2022 at 10:01 AM, the Nurse Practitioner (NP) was asked if she recalled the incident on 8/28/2022 involving Resident #1 and #2. The NP stated, I do not remember that .[the nurse] notified Telehealth but didn't notify me . The NP was asked what protocol should be followed when an incident such as this occurred when the resident was Hepatitis C-positive. The NP stated, They should have done a panel for the other resident, should have been taken like as risk management, the whole shebang with blood on the floor, protocol that goes with that .we don't know if there was any contact .protocol as with HIV [Human Immunodeficiency Virus] any blood really .telehealth should have given them those orders as well .even if it's a day I'm off, they're supposed to notify me .if I'm not physically here, they're supposed to notify me .they [the facility] should know that . During a telephone interview conducted on 11/29/2022 at 2:32 PM, CNA #4 was asked to describe the incident between Resident #1 and Resident #2 on 8/28/2022. CNA #4 stated, Coming on shift, they tell us we have to do a walk through .I see [Resident #1] on the floor and the blood on the floor .Right as you come in the room, maybe an inch inside the door .I wasn't sure who's blood but said .He's on the floor .and went and got the nurse and she came and did her assessment. CNA #4 was asked did you see blood on his [Resident #1] face or a scratch or anything. CNA #4 stated, No ma'am, I didn't really know where the blood was coming from. I just knew there was blood on the floor .then [Resident #2] was like in his chair talking about he had to do what he had to do to protect himself .[Resident #2's] wheelchair was facing [Resident #1]. [Resident #2] was knelt forward and he had his hand holding him [Resident #1] down . During a telephone interview conducted on 11/29/2022 at 1:39 PM, the former DON was asked if she recalled the incident on 8/28/2022 involving Resident #1 and #2. The former DON stated, Vaguely, yes . The former DON was asked if labs were collected after that incident. The former DON stated, I don't know. I do know that typically we will call telehealth or the Nurse Practitioner to let them know of an incident .I don't know if telehealth or the NP ordered any labs. The former DON was asked if she was aware Resident #1 was Hepatitis C-positive. The former DON stated, No [adamantly stated] . The former DON was asked what protocol should have been followed considering there was blood on the floor and on both residents, and Resident #1 was Hepatitis C-positive. The former DON stated, Honestly had I known he was Hep [hepatitis] C-positive, even if the physician didn't ask for labs, I would have gotten labs on [named Resident #2]. I would have wanted serial labs .No, I had no idea. The former DON was unable to recall the emails sent by the Infection Preventionist. The former DON was asked if she spoke with the NP regarding this incident. The former DON stated, I'm pretty sure I told her what happened .I typically did, and if we needed anything, I would call [named the NP] or inform her in the morning meeting .if she would have ordered labs, I would have checked with the nurses to see if they were drawn or resulted . During an interview conducted on 11/30/2022 at 9:40 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #6 was asked what protocol should have been followed after the incident on 8/28/2022 involving Resident #1 and Resident #2. LPN #6 stated, Should notify the doctor of the incident and let him know of his [Resident #1] diagnosis, and both of them should have been tested . During an interview conducted on 12/1/2022 at 12:00 PM, the Medical Director was asked if he was notified of the incident that occurred between Resident #1 and #2 on 8/28/2022. The Medical Director stated, No. The Medical Director was asked if a resident had Chronic Hepatitis C, should there be a particular protocol followed by facility staff after possible blood exposure. The Medical Director stated, If it's open wound, yes .check the other resident, labs and screening for other and STD [sexually transmitted diseases]. During an interview conducted on 12/5/2022 at 1:52 PM, the Infection Preventionist was asked what things were reportable to the Health Department. The Infection Preventionist confirmed the potential exposure to Hepatitis C should have been reported to the Health Department. 5. The surveyors verified the Removal Plan through review of root cause analysis, in-services, audits, and conducting staff interviews. Governing Body will educate community leaders, Administrator (Admin) and Director of Nursing, regarding Unmanageable Residents F742 and F743, Lab and Diagnostic Test Results - Clinical Guidelines, and admission of Residents with Communicable Disease F880. Surveyors verified by review of in-services and interviews. Governing Body/Admin/DON/Staff Development Coordinator (SDC) will educate licensed nurses to Unmanageable Residents F742 and F743, Lab and Diagnostic Test Results - Clinical Guidelines, and admission of Residents with Communicable Disease F880. Surveyors verified by review of in-services and interviews. DON/SDC/Infection Preventionist (ICP)/Unit Manager (UM) will educate new licensed staff regarding Unmanageable Residents F742 and F743, Lab and Diagnostic Test Results - Clinical Guidelines, and admission of Residents with Communicable Disease F880. Surveyors verified by interviews. The Interdisciplinary Team will review the 24 Hour Report and resident altercations through the Clinical Startup Process Monday through Friday to assess need for laboratory related to communicable disease and infections. Surveyors verified by interviews. Residents are screened on admission and during change of condition for potential communicable diseases as we follow our policy of admission of Residents with Communicable Disease F 880, if resident is noted to have flu or COVID, etc. with change of condition, resident is isolated based on necessary precautions and if there is a roommate, roommate is quarantined and tested as indicated until known infection status. Surveyors verified by interviews. Residents with communicable diseases are tracked by The Infection Control Nurse or designee will maintain a log of residents with current evidence of infection or colonization due to multidrug-resistant organisms, including Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)/Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci (VRE)/Clostridioides difficile (C. Diff). When considering room assignments the log will be checked to prevent placing a resident with MRSA/VRE/C. Diff infection or colonization with a resident at risk of infection. Surveyors verified by interviews. Residents that have been or could be exposed to a communicable disease will be quarantined and have appropriate testing as indicated. Surveyors verified by interviews. DON/IDON/SDC/UM will assess residents with communicable diseases and infections for potential exposures and appropriate follow up 3 x week for 4 weeks, then 1 x week for 8 weeks. Results of the audits will be submitted to the Quality Assurance Committee for review and recommendations. Surveyors verified by interviews. The facility's noncompliance of F-880 continues at a scope and severity of D for monitoring the effectiveness of the corrective actions. The facility is required to submit a Plan of Correction.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, medical record review, review of facility investigations and interview the facility failed to ensure all...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, medical record review, review of facility investigations and interview the facility failed to ensure allegations of abuse were reported timely for 2 of 16 (Resident #5 and #13) sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Reporting Suspected Cases and/or Incidents of Rape . dated 5/2022, revealed .All suspected cases or incidents of rape musts be reported immediately to the Administrator and Director of Nursing . Review of the facility's policy titled, .Abuse Program: Training, Reporting and Response Covered Individual Responsibilities dated 10/2022, revealed .The facility .will report alleged violations related to mistreatment, exploitation, neglect or abuse including injury of unknown source .to the proper authorities within prescribed time frames .Upon hire and annually, covered individuals will be notified of their obligations to report suspicions of crimes per above .Repeat the training when covered individuals indicate they do not understand their reporting responsibilities .Examples of crimes that should be reported immediately to the Administrator .Rape .Assault and battery .Sexual abuse . 2. Review of the medical record, revealed Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Dementia, Diabetes, Osteoarthritis, Psychosis, and Anxiety. Review of the significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #5 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment and required extensive assistance for activities of daily living (ADLs). Review of the Progress Note dated 8/20/2022 at 8:05 AM, revealed .notified by nurse: 'resident complains of pain in L shoulder .Will get STAT [urgent] xray of L [left] shoulder. If abnormal pt [patient] will need FTF [Face to face]. Review of the Nursing Note dated 8/20/2022 at 8:21 AM, revealed This nurse was called to residents room by CNA [Certified Nursing Assistant #1] asking me to assess resident arm d/t [due to] complaints of pain. Upon entering room, this nurse observed resident lying in bed with L arm cradled to side of body. Resident stated her arm was 'hurting real bad' when asked where she was hurting resident stated her shoulder while guarding her L arm. Limited ROM [Range of motion] noted. When this nurse asked resident what happened she stated there was 'a girl that worked with them (referring to the CNA at bedside) that was real rough and yanking' on her. This nurse notified unit manager on duty, DON [Director of Nursing] and telehealth contacted at this time. Orders given to STAT x-ray L shoulder and notify telehealth with results. Review of the Nursing Note dated 8/20/2022 at 9:12 PM revealed X ray result indicates left shoulder humeral fracture . During an interview conducted on 12/5/2022 at 4:15 PM, CNA #1 was asked about Resident #5 incident. CNA #1 stated, I went in to dry [named Resident #5] .she said 'oh' I asked her what's wrong. [Named Resident #5] said 'I'm hurting, my arm .that girl beat the [expletive] out of me' I ran out of the room for the nurse. I got [named LPN #1] .she told him the same thing .He said for me to go on home he would handle it. The next morning when I came in and I had the same section .[named Resident #5] said her arm still hurt. I ran got .[named LPN #2] .[Named LPN #2] pulled the cover back and she said, 'I think her arm is broke' . During an interview on 12/6/2022 at 10:15 AM, LPN #2 was asked about the incident with Resident #5. LPN #2 confirmed CNA #1 reported Resident #5's arm pain on 8/20/2022 at about 7:30 AM. LPN #2 was asked if Resident #5 told her what happened to her arm. LPN #2 stated, [Named Resident #5] told me the 'big white, fat, [expletive] shook' her. I wasn't here the day before . 3. Review of the medical record revealed, Resident #13 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of Dementia, Cognitive Communication Deficit, Hypertension and Chronic Kidney Disease. Review of the quarterly MDS dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS score of 9, indicating moderate cognitive impairment, limited assistance was provided by staff with transfers, mobility on the unit, and dressing, and extensive assistance was provided by staff with mobility off the unit. Review of the Care Plan dated 3/12/2021, revealed .impaired cognitive function/impaired thought processes r/t [related to] BIMS score in moderately impaired range and diagnosis of unspecified dementia and age-related cognitive decline. She has difficulty with memory recall and periods of confusion and throughout the day. HX [History]: periods of confusion with increased anxiety [.] Hx of making statements about being raped and someone getting her drunk with liquor .11/30/2022 psych [psychiatric] eval .12/01/22 Medication review with medication adjustment . Review of the Nurses Note dated 11/28/2022 at 1:58 AM, revealed Resident was confused, anxious, and wandering the 105 hallway at approx [approximately] 7:15 pm. She stated, 'somebody got me drunk and put me in a room, they tried to rape me and all of them went back to my house, they keep filling me up with liquor, and I had to douche 3 times afterwards'. Resident became nauseous. She spit up x [times] 2 a scant amount of clear fluid. She stated that she felt no pain at this time. She did mention that she was afraid but could not mention what she was afraid of .Resident took her medication and went to bed at approx. 8:00 pm with no further occurrences. No complications noted at this time. Will continue to monitor for any changes. Review of a Nurses Note dated 11/30/2022 at 1:59 PM, revealed This nurse at 1135am [11:35 AM] along with 100 hall charge nurse and nurse manager completed a head-to-toe skin assessment on resident at this time. Skin pink/pale, warm/dry with no bruising, redness or s/s [signs and symptoms] of trauma witnessed to peri area, trunk or ext [extremities] x 4. No c/o [complaints of] pain or discomfort voiced, witnessed or reported. Skin intact with numerous moles, random sizes over complete body. As placing clothing back in place with assist the res [resident] asked, 'Did I do something wrong, is there something wrong with me?' This nurse voiced to res that we do complete head to toe skin assessments on everyone weekly to make sure nothing we can't see ourselves gets missed. This nurse then asked res if anything was wrong or had happened recently, she would like to talk about. Res voiced 'everything has been okay of course except 20 years ago when I was at the hospital, you know for the surgery when they took part of my brain for the surgery when they raped me.' This nurse then asked if she had any sexual trauma since then and res voiced 'no that was a long time ago when they raped me at the hospital, I guess they call it that because that's the only bad thing that happens to women is rape, isn't it?' . Review of a facility investigation initiated 11/30/2022, revealed .On 11/30/2022 around 11:50 am [AM] [named Regional Nurse Consultant] was reviewing resident charts and saw the above note on [named Resident #13] written by [named Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #7] on 11/28/22 .[Named Regional [NAME] President (RVP)] contacted [LPN #7] who confirmed her nursing note. Then [named RVP] gave [named LPN #7] a 1:1 [one on one] in-service on identifying and reporting abuse . On 11/30/2022 at 12:00 PM, the Administrator notified surveyors of an allegation of abuse on 11/28/2022 that was discovered during a chart review. The Administrator confirmed staff did not report the incident when it occurred. During a telephone interview conducted on 12/6/2022 at 2:39 PM, LPN #7 confirmed she wrote the nurses note regarding the allegation of sexual abuse by Resident #13 on 11/28/2022. LPN #7 was asked what was her mental and behavioral status prior to the allegation. LPN #7 stated, She was confused. I had worked with her before and she appeared to be at her baseline .I was reading her chart and assumed she had behaviors in the past and so she was having a behavior. Like delusions. I knew she had not been out of the building so nobody took her to her house . LPN #7 was asked did you report the behavior to anyone. LPN #7 stated, Yes, I told my relief that she was having some behaviors earlier but that she [was better]. I gave report on her in shift report. LPN #7 was asked did you write it on a 24 hour report book. LPN #7 stated, I don't know if they had one .I was contract and it was the end of my contract . LPN #7 was asked were you in-serviced on abuse when you were hired. LPN #7 stated, I did an in-service on abuse on [named computer training program]. LPN #7 was asked were you in-serviced on abuse following this incident. LPN #7 stated, They called me .I was just contract and my contract has ended, it was just a 6 week assignment. LPN #7 confirmed she is no longer working at the facility. Review of LPN #7's employee file revealed she signed a 6 week contract on 10/6/2022 and her last day worked was 11/28/2022. During an interview on 12/7/2022 at 9:20 AM, the MDS Coordinator confirmed that allegations of abuse should be reported to administration immediately. During an interview on 12/7/2022 at 4:56 PM, LPN #8 confirmed she relieved LPN #7 on 11/29/2022 and LPN #7 did not report Resident #13's allegation of being gotten drunk and raped when giving report to her on 11/29/2022. During an interview on 12/8/2022 at 9:36 AM, the Administrator was asked did you do any in-services on reporting abuse following the incident. The Administrator stated, We did a 1:1 with the nurse . The Administrator confirmed no other staff in-services on reporting abuse were given related to the allegation by Resident #13.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Investigate Abuse (Tag F0610)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, medical record review, review of facility investigations, and interview, the facility failed to complete...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, medical record review, review of facility investigations, and interview, the facility failed to complete thorough investigations of abuse for 4 of 16 (Residents #1, #4, #12 and #13) sampled residents reviewed for abuse. The findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled .Abuse Prevention Program, Investigation ., dated 8/2022, revealed .Reports of resident abuse, neglect and injuries of unknown sources shall be promptly and thoroughly investigated by facility management .The individual conducting the investigation will, as a minimum: a. Review the completed documentation forms; b. Review the resident's medical record to determine events leading up to the incident; c. Interview the person(s) reporting the incident; d. Interview any witness to the incident; e. Interview the resident (as medically appropriate); f. Interview staff members (on all shifts) who have had contact with the resident during the period of the alleged incident; g. interview the resident's roommate, family members and visitors as able or as appropriate to the situation; h. Review all events leading up to the alleged incident .Witness reports will be obtained in writing. Witnesses will required to sign and date such reports .Post validated allegations of abuse, the QA [Quality Assurance] team should evaluate the following: a. Changes that may need to be made to prevent further occurrences; b. Defining how care will be changed or improved to protect residents; c. Immediate and ongoing training needs and staff competency as needed . 2. Review of the medical record, revealed Resident #1 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Schizophrenia, Dementia with Behavioral Disturbance/Psychotic Disturbance, Chronic Kidney Disease, Hypertension, and Chronic Hepatitis C. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed Resident #1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 00, which indicated severe cognitive impairment, and exhibited wandering behaviors daily. Review of the Nursing Note dated 9/7/2022 at 8:42 PM, revealed .Writer [Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #3) standing at med cart passing medication when writer observed res [Resident #1] walking up behind res .[Resident #4]. Res [Resident #1] struck res [Resident #4] .in the rear right side of his neck with a closed fist. Writer immediately jumped in between the residents and redirected res [Resident #1] .away from res [Resident #4] .Writer walked down to his room and put cna [Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)] as one on one with res [Resident #1]. Writer went back and assessed resident [Resident #4] .no obvious signs of injury and made no faces of pain or any complaints . 3. Review of the medical record, revealed Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Alzheimer's Disease, Dementia with Behavioral Disturbance, Hypertension, and Protein-Calorie Malnutrition. Review of the quarterly MDS dated [DATE], revealed Resident #4 had a BIMS of 99, which indicated severe cognitive impairment, with physical behavioral symptoms toward others on 1-3 days and rejection of care behaviors on 4-6 days of the 7-day lookback period, and daily wandering behaviors. Review of the facility's investigation dated 9/7/2022, revealed there were no witness statements obtained for the resident to resident altercation that occurred between Resident #1 and #4. During an interview conducted on 12/12/2022 at 10:34 AM, the Interim Administrator presented the facility's investigation on the resident to resident altercation that occurred between Resident #1 and #2 on 9/7/2022, and stated, I've asked staff to recreate their statements .anybody who was here .his [Resident #1's altercations] stuff was altogether, they were overlapping .so I pulled it out and this is all I've been able to create . The Interim Administrator confirmed there were no witness statements in the facility's investigation, and according to the facility's Abuse policy, witness statements should be obtained following a resident to resident altercation. 3. Review of the medical record, revealed Resident #12 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of Hemiplegia, Cerebrovascular Disease, Diabetes, Depression, and Hypertension. Review of the quarterly MDS dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS of 15, indicating intact cognition. Review of the Care Plan dated 2/18/22, revealed .10/22/2022 refusing showers .has behavior of making false accusations against staff and other residents Examples-forgetting about smoking and ADL care .Hx [History] verbally abusing others at smoke break .Hx refusing care . Review of the facility investigation dated 9/1/2022, revealed .[named Resident #12] .stated that she used her call light a number of times then the CNA [named CNA #7] told her that they were not going to play those games with her tonight .took her glasses off and didn't give them back .asked cna [CNA] to tell nurse that she wanted her medicine, the cna [CNA] exclaimed that 'you ain't the queen of Sheba and she'll get to you when she can' .moved the call light out of her reach . The investigation included statements from 3 day shift and 2 night shift staff, Resident #12, and 7 other residents. The investigation did not include statements from CNA #7, LPN #9 (the nurse working the evening of 8/31/2022), or the Scheduler (who was suspended for the incident). During an interview on 12/7/2022 at 4:14 PM, the former DON confirmed Resident #12 reported the allegation of abuse to her. The former DON stated, I questioned the CNA [CNA #7], she was suspended for 3 days and we had a heart to heart about customer service and how you talk to residents .The nurse did not report it to me. She [the Scheduler] was also suspended . The former DON was asked did you get statements from the CNA (CNA #7) and the nurse (the Scheduler). The former DON stated, I believe so .[named Social Services Assistant (SSA)] usually in charge of getting the statements together. The CNA stated she did .tell her that we have other patients but she denied taking her call light away and taking her glasses away. The nurse was suspended for 1 shift and the CNA was suspended for 3. The former DON was asked was the incident taken to QAPI [Quality Assurance Performance Improvement]. The former DON stated, No ma'am . LPN #9 was actually the nurse who worked the night of the incident, the Scheduler, who did not work that night was suspended, and the DON never acknowledged that she talked to LPN #9 about the incident. During a telephone interview conducted on 12/07/2022 at 9:20 PM, CNA #7 was asked to recall the incident with Resident #12. CNA #7 stated, .I had already put her to bed and set her up the way she likes. She likes everything a certain way. I was in another resident's room and went out to get something and her [Resident #12] light was on again. I went in and turned off the light and told her 'I am helping someone else right now. I will come back. I have other people who want to be put to bed too. CNA #7 was asked did you take her call light away. CNA #7 stated No. I put her glasses, her call light, all her stuff right where she likes it .I took care of her the rest of the night and we didn't have any problems. CNA #7 confirmed she was suspended pending the investigation but was allowed to return to work and is no longer assigned to Resident #12. CNA #7 confirmed LPN #9 was the nurse working the night of the incident. During an interview on 12/8/2022 at 8:39 AM, the SSA was asked who gets witness statements following an incident or allegation of abuse. The SSA stated, If they [the Administrator and DON] don't get them, I get them. The SSA was asked how do you know who to get statements from. The SSA stated, Normally we get statements from people who have an 8 BIMS or above, and get statements from staff who worked the day before and the day of, on that hall . The SSA was asked do you get statements from Nurses. The SSA stated, They usually do theirs on an incident report .If they witness it they do [write a statement], but usually it's on the incident report. I usually get statements from whoever [named former Administrator] tell me to . The SSA was asked did you get statements on the incident related to (Resident #12) and (CNA #7). The SSA stated, The only thing I got was the resident's statements and the CNAs that were here. She [CNA #7] was on vacation. [Named former Administrator] got her statement. The SSA was asked did the former Administrator get a statement from the nurse also. The SSA stated, I'm not sure . During an interview on 12/8/2022 at 12:39 PM, the former Administrator was asked what is the process for a staff-to-resident abuse allegation. The former Administrator stated, .if we have a staff-to-resident we had to make sure the resident was safe .we had to identify that person and make sure the resident and other residents are safe .get them [staff] out of the building. Interviewing people that worked in the last 24 hours. Interviewed residents on that assignment to see if anyone else had anything happen . The former Administrator was asked who did you get statements from. The former Administrator stated, Anyone who worked around that person, anyone that worked that unit, the shift before . The former Administrator was asked do you recall an incident involving Resident #12 and a CNA. The former Administrator stated, Yes . The former Administrator was asked who interviewed the CNA. The former Administrator stated, . I would need the folder to see if I did it or if [named SSA] did it. She [CNA #7] was like 'I didn't mean anything by that' . The former Administrator was asked did you interview the Nurse. The former Administrator stated, [Named the Scheduler] knew that [named Resident #12] was offended by what [named CNA #7] said .when I got those details, they both had to be suspended . The former Administrator was asked did you get a statement from the nurse. The Administrator stated, I know I didn't talk to [named the Scheduler]. Usually if it's a nurse that needs to be talked to, its by her supervisor. To interview it could have been [named the SSA] or the [former] DON, for disciplinary action it would have been the [former] DON. The former Administrator was asked did you have an Ad Hoc [impromptu] QAPI meeting related to this. The former Administrator stated, I'm sure not .I believe with [CNA #7] we thought it was isolated . The former Administrator confirmed the witness statements and investigation documents were kept in a red folder usually initiated by nursing and completed by the SSA. The former Administrator was asked what kind of training did (the SSA) have to do these red folders. The former Administrator stated, I sat down with her and went through . The former Administrator was asked who was responsible for making sure the investigation was complete. The former Administrator stated, She [the SSA] would do the folder and I would review. She, [the former DON], and I would review it. But essentially she [the SSA] would do it and I would review it and put it in the file cabinet . During a telephone interview on 12/12/2022 at 2:04 PM, LPN #9 was asked if she recalled the incident between Resident #12 and CNA #7. LPN #9 stated, I was standing in the hallway right outside the door when the CNA walked in. The CNA did not take away her call light. I was getting her meds [medications] ready and I went in right after the CNA left. She did not take her call light away, she had it in the bed with her. The CNA was in the room answering her call light and told the resident [Resident #12] she was assisting another resident and would be back. LPN #9 was asked if she wrote a statement about the incident. LPN #9 stated, No, they never even contacted me. I heard they had another nurse [named the Scheduler] on suspension. I don't know why they suspended her, it was only for 1 day, but she wasn't even in the building. LPN #9 denied hearing the CNA make any derogatory comments to Resident #12. LPN #9 stated, She [Resident #12] is the type that gets mad if you don't do exactly what you want her to do. She told me she was going to get her [CNA #7] fired . During an interview on 12/12/2022 at 2:19 PM, the Interim Administrator confirmed there was no statement from or documentation in the red folder related to the Nurse who took care of Resident #12 on 8/31/2022. During an interview on 12/12/2022 at 2:39 PM, the Interim Administrator entered the conference room and stated I'm finishing the investigation on [Resident #12]. They didn't get anybody's statements that were directly related to the incident. During an interview on 12/12/2022 at 3:24 PM, the Scheduler confirmed she was suspended for 1 shift related to the incident related to Resident #12 and CNA #7. The Scheduler stated, [Named former DON] .called me, left a message on my phone, and told me they had to suspend me for a day because I didn't report an allegation by [Resident #12] .I told them I did my own investigation and told them it was [named LPN #9] and the [former] Administrator stated 'We had to show that we did something so we suspended you'. The scheduler was asked were you asked to write a statement. The scheduler stated, No ma'am. During an interview on 12/12/2022 at 3:48 PM, the Interim Administrator confirmed the investigation on Resident #12 should have been completed when the incident happened. Review of the medical record, revealed, Resident #13 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of Dementia, Cognitive Communication Deficit, Hypertension and Chronic Kidney Disease. Review of the quarterly MDS dated , 10/7/2022, revealed a BIMS score of 9, indicating moderate cognitive impairment, limited assistance was provided by staff with transfers, mobility on the unit, and dressing, and extensive assistance was provided by staff with mobility off the unit. Review of the Care Plan dated 3/12/2021, revealed .impaired cognitive function/impaired thought processes r/t [related to] BIMS score in moderately impaired range and diagnosis of unspecified dementia and age-related cognitive decline. She has difficulty with memory recall and periods of confusion and throughout the day. HX [History]: periods of confusion with increased anxiety [.] Hx of making statements about being raped and someone getting her drunk with liquor .11/30/2022 psych eval .12/01/22 Medication review with medication adjustment . Review of a Nurses Note dated 11/28/2022 at 1:58 AM, revealed Resident was confused, anxious, and wandering the 105 hallway at approx [approximately] 7:15 pm. She stated, somebody got me drunk and put me in a room, they tried to rape me and all of them went back to my house, they keep filling me up with liquor, and I had to douche 3 times afterwards. Resident became nauseous. She spit up x [times] 2 a scant amount of clear fluid. She stated that she felt no pain at this time. She did mention that she was afraid but could not mention what she was afraid of .Resident took her medication and went to bed at approx. 8:00 pm with no further occurrences. No complications noted at this time. Will continue to monitor for any changes. Review of a Nurses Note dated 11/30/2022 at 1:59 PM, revealed This nurse at 1135am [11:35 AM] along with 100 hall charge nurse and nurse manager completed a head-to-toe skin assessment on resident at this time. Skin pink/pale, warm/dry with no bruising, redness or s/s [signs and symptoms] of trauma witnessed to peri area, trunk or ext [extremities] x 4. No c/o pain or discomfort voiced, witnessed or reported. Skin intact with numerous moles, random sizes over complete body. As placing clothing back in place with assist the res [resident] asked, Did I do something wrong, is there something wrong with me? This nurse voiced to res that we do complete head to toe skin assessments on everyone weekly to make sure nothing we can't see ourselves gets missed. This nurse then asked res if anything was wrong or had happened recently, she would like to talk about. Res voiced everything has been okay of course except 20 years ago when I was at the hospital, you know for the surgery when they took part of my brain for the surgery when they raped me. This nurse then asked if she had any sexual trauma since then and res voiced no that was a long time ago when they raped me at the hospital, I guess they call it that because that's the only bad thing that happens to women is rape, isn't it . Review of a facility investigation initiated 11/30/2022, revealed .On 11/30/2022 around 11:50 am [AM] [named Regional Nurse Consultant] was reviewing resident charts and saw the above note on [named Resident #13] written by [named Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #7] on 11/28/22 .[Named Regional [NAME] President (RVP)] contacted [LPN #7] who confirmed her nursing note. Then [named RVP] gave [named LPN #7] a 1:1 [one on one] in-service on identifying and reporting abuse . The investigation included statements from the Interim Administrator, the RVP, the Social Services Director, the Activities Director and the Nurses who assessed Resident #13 on 11/30/2022. Review of the statement given by the RVP dated 11/30/2022 revealed I .spoke with [named LPN #7] .She was caring for [named Resident #13] on 11/28/2022, and she reported that she was rapped [raped] and that they give her a lot of alcohol. [Named LPN #7] said she seemed confused, but she was in her room and was safe. Other than the interview included in the RVP's statement, no statements from staff who worked on 11/28/2022 or other residents were included in the investigation. During an interview on 12/5/2022 at 2:46 PM, the Administrator was asking if there was any additional paperwork related to the investigation of Resident #13's allegation. The Administrator stated, I believe that's everything. During an interview on 12/5/2022 at 4:02 PM, the Social Services Director (SSD) was asked who notified you of the allegation involving Resident #13. The SSD stated, The Administrator. The SSD confirmed she attempted to interview Resident #13 on 11/30/2022 when she was notified of the incident. The SSD was asked did you interview the roommate and ask her if anything had happened. The SSD stated, No, we didn't interview the roommate. The SSD was asked did you interview any other residents. The SSD stated, No. The SSD was asked do you usually interview other residents as part of an investigation. The SSD stated, We do. The SSD was asked, do you know why no other residents were interviewed this time. The SSD stated, I don't. During a telephone interview conducted on 12/6/2022 at 2:39 PM, LPN #7 confirmed she wrote the nurses note regarding the allegation of sexual abuse by Resident #13 on 11/28/2022. LPN #7 was asked what her mental and behavioral status was prior to the allegation. LPN #7 stated, She was confused. I had worked with her before, and she appeared to be at her baseline .I was reading her chart and assumed she had behaviors in the past and so she was having a behavior. Like delusions. I knew she had not been out of the building so nobody took her to her house . LPN #7 was asked did you report the behavior to anyone. LPN #7 stated, Yes, I told my relief that she was having some behaviors earlier but that she [was better]. I gave report on her in shift report. LPN #7 was asked did you write it on a 24 hour report book. LPN #7 stated, I don't know if they had one .I was contract, and it was the end of my contract . LPN #7 was asked were you in-serviced on abuse when you were hired. LPN #7 stated, I did an in service on abuse on [named computer training program]. LPN #7 was asked were you in-serviced on abuse following this incident. LPN #7 stated, They called me .I was just contract and my contract has ended, it was just a 6 week assignment. LPN #7 confirmed she is no longer working at the facility. During an interview on 12/8/2022 at 9:36 AM, the Interim Administrator was asked do you usually get statements from staff and residents during an abuse allegation. The Interim Administrator stated, Yes. The Interim Administrator was asked did you get statements from residents related to this allegation (Resident #13). The Interim Administrator stated, I didn't feel like we needed them with the information we had. The Interim Administrator was asked did you do any in-services related to not reporting the incident. The Interim Administrator stated, We did a 1:1 with the nurse . On 12/12/2022 at 10:43 AM, the Administrator brought a folder into the conference room and stated Here is the [named Resident #13] folder .we did additional interviews. Review of the folder revealed 10 residents were interviewed on 12/9/2022 including Resident #13's roommate. During an interview on 12/13/2022 at 12:43 PM the Interim Administrator was asked what a thorough investigation included. The Interim Administrator stated, So, when its reported to me we want to make sure everybody was safe, then I ask them to get statements, they call the family, call the doctor .then I come in , I send in a report to the state and I go ahead and print the face sheet, get the BIMS, get the care plans, they always do pain assessments, skin assessments .look at labs, try to go down every avenue as to how the incident can occur. Call the police and get a case number. Sometimes I call the ombudsman, I haven't done that as much here .interview residents if there are interviewable residents .come together as a team .If there is a possibility of a fracture you want to make sure that is addressed timely. Then if we need to, we will do an ad hoc meeting and we take any of it and all of it to QAPI. Then I do the summary and send that to state . The Interim Administrator was asked do you feel like the investigations completed by the former Administration were completely and thoroughly investigated. The Interim Administrator stated, No, I don't. The Interim Administrator was asked who would you get statements from. The Interim Administrator stated, Certainly anyone who was directly related to the incident, and I try to get statements from the day before . The Interim Administrator was asked who is ultimately responsible for making sure allegations are investigated thoroughly and timely. The Interim Administrator stated, The Administrator. In my findings, she [the former Administrator] passed it off to other people, but I just don't see that as good practice. Ultimately the buck stops with me.
Jun 2022 6 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Investigate Abuse (Tag F0610)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, facility investigation review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to timely and t...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, facility investigation review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to timely and thoroughly investigate an incident of resident-to-resident abuse for 2 of 7 sampled residents (Resident #11 and #32) reviewed for abuse. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse Investigations, revised 11/2017, revealed .Reports of resident abuse .shall be promptly and thoroughly investigated by facility management .The individual conducting the investigation will, as a minimum .Review the completed documented forms .Interview any witnesses to the incident .Interview staff members (on all shifts) who have had contact with the resident during the period of the alleged incident .Interview the resident's roommate .Witness reports will be obtained in writing . Review of the medical record, revealed Resident #11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Schizophrenia, Dementia, and Psychotic Disorder Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #11 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10, indicating he was moderately impaired. Review of the medical record, revealed Resident #32 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of Parkinson Disease, Legal Blindness, Hypertension, and Hyperlipidemia. Review of the annual MDS dated [DATE], revealed Resident #32 had BIMS of 11, indicating he was moderately impaired and had wandering behaviors. Review of the Progress Note dated 5/25/2022, revealed .Resident [#32] heard yelling out random people names .When this nurse asked if resident needed anything or any help .resident [#32] began yelling and cursing .Resident [#32] continued to be agitated and began to argue with roommate [Resident #11] .yelling at roommate .Roommate immediately removed from room .DON [Director of Nursing] notified of situation .NP [Nurse Practitioner] to be notified . The facility's investigation of the allegation of resident-to-resident abuse by Resident #32 did not include a completed Incident Report, interviews from residents, and interviews/statements from all staff members working on the morning of the incident. The Investigation did not include 1 on 1 monitoring of Resident #32 (the aggressor). During a telephone interview on 6/8/2022 at 9:41 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #5 confirmed she did not complete an Incident Report, did not complete a witness statement, and did not have all staff members on that shift complete a witness statement. During an interview on 6/8/2022 at 10:40 AM, the Interim Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed there was no documentation of 1 on 1 observation of Resident #32 and no written witness statements from staff members. During an interview on 6/8/2022 at 11:03 AM, the Administrator confirmed the facility did not complete a thorough investigation of the resident-to-resident altercation. The Administrator confirmed there was no Incident Report completed, no witness statements completed, and no documentation of 1 on 1 monitoring for Resident #32. During an interview on 6/8/2022 at 5:09 PM, the Unit Manager was asked what the process was for a resident-to-resident incident. The Unit manager stated .we complete an Incident Report .document what happened .what was done .and who you notified .if there is a witnesses .have all staff on the unit write a witness statement .separate the resident .the aggressor is placed on 1 on 1 observation .document the 1 on 1 observations on the safety check log .
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive Care Plan for Demen...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive Care Plan for Dementia for 2 of 4 sampled residents (Resident #10 and #62) reviewed. The findings include: The facility's policy titled, Care Plans - Comprehensive, revised 11/2017, revealed .And individualized comprehensive person centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and time frames to meet the resident medical, nursing, mental and psychological needs is developed for each resident . Review of the medical record, revealed Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Dementia, Atrial Fibrillation, Dysphagia, and Major Depressive Disorder. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed Resident #10 had Non-Alzheimer's Dementia. Review of the Care Plan dated 2/28/2022, revealed there was no comprehensive Care Plan for Dementia. Review of the medical record, revealed Resident #62 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Peripheral Vascular Disease, Dementia, and Hypertension Review of the admission MDS dated [DATE], revealed Resident #62 had a BIMS score of 2, indicating he was severely cognitively impaired and had Non-Alzheimer's Dementia. Review of the Care Plan dated 5/1/2022, revealed there was no comprehensive Care Plan for Dementia. During an interview on 6/8/2022 at 2:39 PM, the Social Services Director confirmed Resident #10 and Resident #62 did not have a comprehensive Care Plan for Dementia.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0661 (Tag F0661)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the completion of a discharge summar...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the completion of a discharge summary that included a recapitulation of the resident's stay, the disposition status of the resident at the time of discharge, and a post discharge plan of care for 1 of 1 sampled residents (Resident #388) reviewed for discharge. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Discharge Summary and Plan, revealed .When a resident's discharge is anticipated, a discharge summary and post-discharged plan will be developed .The discharge summary will include a recapitulation of the resident's stay at this facility and a final summary of the resident's status at the time of discharge .The recapitulation will include .diagnoses, Course of illness, treatment or therapy, Pertinent lab, radiology and consultation results, reconciliation of all pre-discharge medications with the resident's post discharge medications .a final summary paragraph . Review of the medical record, revealed Resident #388 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Disruption of Wound, Amputation of Left Great Toe, Peripheral Vascular Disease, and Pressure Ulcer of Right Buttocks. Review of a Physician's Order dated 1/21/2022, revealed .Discharge home . Review of a Social Services Note dated 1/28/2022, revealed the patient representative was in the facility and informed staff she would be taking resident home on 1/29/2022 at 2:00 PM, transporting the resident in a private vehicle and the resident would be living with her and receiving Hospice and Home Health services. Review of a Transfer Note dated 1/29/2022, revealed .residents family picked up resident at 4:50 PM .in suv (Sport Utility Vehicle) . Review of the medical record, revealed the facility failed to complete a discharge summary to recapitulate the resident's stay at the facility, his disposition, and post discharge plan of care. During an interview on 6/8/2022 at 11:30 AM, the Interim Director of Nursing (DON) was asked who should complete the discharge summary when a resident is discharged home. The Interim DON stated, .Well that is something we just discovered we will need to work on .
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 4 nurses (Licensed...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 4 nurses (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #7) followed policies and procedures for the administration of medication through a Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) tube for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #65) observed and the facility failed to ensure Physician Orders for lab were followed for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #9) reviewed for lab services. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Administering Medication Through an Enteral Tube, revised 2/2018, revealed .The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for the safe administration of medications through an enteral tube .Dilute powdered, crushed, or split (capsule) medications at the bedside . Review of the medical record, revealed Resident #65 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Parkinson's Disease, Schizophrenia, Gastrostomy, and Depression. Review of the Physician's Orders dated 6/7/2022, revealed .Cephalexin Capsule 500 MG [milligrams] Give 1 capsule via [by way of] PEG-Tube four times a day .for 10 Days . Review of the Physician's Orders dated 5/31/2022, revealed .Zyprexa Tablet 5 MG .Give 1 tablet .two times a day . Observation at the 300 Hall Medication Cart on 6/8/2022 at 9:30 AM, revealed LPN #7 sanitized her hands, crushed the Zyprexa tablet, placed it in a plastic medication cup, then opened the Cephalexin capsule and put the granular in a medication cup. LPN #7 entered Resident #65's room, washed her hands, donned clean gloves and began to administer the medication via PEG tube. LPN #7 flushed the PEG tube with 30 milliliters (ml) of water, poured the crushed Zyprexa into the peg tube, then flushed the PEG tube with 30 ml of water. LPN #7 poured the Cephalexin into the PEG tube, then flushed the PEG tube with 30 ml of water, reconnected the enteral feeding, disposed of the trash, sanitized her hands, and exited the room. LPN #7 did not to dilute each medication with 5-10 ml of water prior to administering the medications through the PEG tube. During an interview on 6/9/2022 at 10:04 AM, the Interim Director of Nursing (DON) was asked if medications should be diluted before they are administered through a PEG tube. The DON stated, Of course .supposed to be with 10 milliliters of water or it will clog the tube . During an interview on 6/9/2022 at 11:04 AM, LPN #7 confirmed she should have diluted both medications before administering them through the PEG tube. Review of the medical record, revealed Resident #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Alzheimer's Disease, Dysphagia, Protein-Calorie Malnutrition, and Diabetes. Review of the Registered Dietician note dated 4/21/2022, revealed .weight is down 1.4 pounds x [times] 1 week .Last week added magic cup to lunch trays daily. Today recommending MD [Medical Doctor] review for weight loss .requesting full lab work-up to include CMP [Complete Metabolic Panel] .for continued weight decline . Review of the Physician's Orders dated 4/22/2022, revealed .CBC [Complete Blood Count] [is a set of medical laboratory test that provide information about the cells in a person's blood] .CMP [is a blood sample that measures 14 different substances in your blood] . Review of the medical record, revealed a CBC and CMP were not collected until 5/22/2022. During an interview on 6/9/2022 at 9:24 AM, the Interim Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed the CBC and CMP were not performed until 5/22/2022, and stated, .no excuse lab was not done in April .no excuse .
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Notification of Changes (Tag F0580)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to notify the Physician and patie...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to notify the Physician and patient representative for an allegation of abuse for 1 of 7 sampled residents (Resident #11) reviewed for abuse and the facility failed to notify patient representatives of changes in pressure ulcer status for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #36 and Resident #388) reviewed for pressure ulcers/injuries. The findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Reporting of Abuse Allegations, revised 11/2017, revealed .All suspected violations and all substantiated incidents of abuse .Should a suspected violation or substantiated incident of mistreatment, neglect, injuries of an unknown source, or abuse (including resident to resident abuse .) be reported, the facility Administrator, or his/her designee, will promptly notify the following persons (verbally or written) of such incident .The State Licensing/recertification agency .The resident's Attending Physician .The facility Medical Director . Review of the facility's policy titled, Change in a Resident's Condition or Status, revised 11/2017, revealed .The facility staff shall promptly notify the resident, his or her Attending Physician, and resident representative of changes in the resident's medical/mental condition and/or status .A representative of the community will notify the resident, and the resident representative when .There is a change in the resident's level of care status . Review of the facility's policy titled, Guidelines for Notifying Physicians of Clinical Problems, revised 4/2007, revealed .medical care problems are communicated to the medical staff in a timely, efficient, and effective manner . Review of the medical record, revealed Resident #11 was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnoses of Schizophrenia, Dementia, and Psychotics Disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed Resident #11 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10, which indicated he was moderately cognitively impaired. Review of the Progress Note dated 5/25/2022, revealed .Resident [#32] heard yelling out random people names .When this nurse asked if resident needed anything or any help .resident [#32] began yelling and cursing .Resident [#32] continued to be agitated and began to argue with roommate [Resident #11] .yelling at roommate .Roommate immediately removed from room .DON [Director of Nursing] notified of situation .NP [Nurse Practitioner] to be notified . The facility's investigation of the allegation of resident-to-resident abuse did not include notification of Resident #11's family or Physician. During an interview on 6/7/2022 at 10:02 AM, the Social Services Director confirmed that the Physician and the family should be notified where there is a resident-to-resident altercation. The Social Services Director confirmed she did not notify Resident #11's family or Physician of the resident-to-resident altercation. During an interview on 6/8/2022 at 5:09 PM, the Unit Manager and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #4 confirmed that Resident #11's Physician and family should have been notified. During an interview on 6/9/2022 at 11:52 AM, the Nurse Practitioner (NP) confirmed the staff did not notify her of the resident-to-resident incident. Review of the medical record, revealed Resident #36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Protein-Calorie Malnutrition, Dementia, and Unstageable Pressure Ulcer Left Heel. Review of the quarterly MDS dated [DATE] and the quarterly MDS dated [DATE], revealed Resident #36 had a BIMS score of 8, which indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired and had 1 unstageable pressure ulcer. Review of the facility's Weekly Pressure Injury sheet dated 4/21/2022, revealed .1.1x1.8x0.6 .unstageable .improving . Review of the facility's Weekly Pressure Injury sheets dated 4/25/2022, revealed the pressure injury was now a Stage 4 and was improving. There was no documentation that the patient representative was notified of the wound status. Review of the facility's Weekly Pressure Injury sheet dated 5/16/2022, revealed .5/16/2022 .0.3x0.4x0.3 .stage 4 .improving .Notified Family .3/28/2022 . Review of the facility's Weekly Pressure Injury sheet dated 5/31/2022, revealed .5/31/2022 .0.4x0.7x0.7 .stage 4 .declined .Notified Family .3/28/2022 . There was no documentation that the patient representative was notified of the wound status. Observation in the resident's room on 6/8/2022 at 3:12 PM, revealed the Treatment Nurse removed the dressing to the Resident #36's left heel and revealed an open wound. During an interview on 6/8/2022 at 3:34 PM, the Treatment Nurse confirmed that patient representatives should be notified when there is a change in a resident's wound condition and when the Physician changes the treatment orders. The Treatment Nurse confirmed the family should have been notified when Resident #36's wound had a change in status on 4/25/2022 and 5/31/2022. The Treatment Nurse confirmed that she was behind on her documentation and that all families were notified and given wound updates on 5/25/2022. Review of the medical record, revealed Resident #388 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Disruption of Wound, Amputation of Left Great Toe, Peripheral Vascular Disease, and Pressure Ulcer of Right Buttocks. Review of the admission MDS dated [DATE], revealed Resident #388 had a BIMS of 14, indicating the resident was cognitively intact and had diagnoses of Amputation Left Great Toes, and a Stage 2 Pressure Ulcer Buttocks. Review of the facility's Weekly Pressure Injury Sheet dated 1/24/2022, revealed the following: a.L Heel .Previous Measure .4.0 x 3.0 x 0.1 .Current Measure 4.1 x 6.4 x 0.1 .100% Eschar .Declined .Notified Family .1/11/2022 . b.R Heel .Previous Measure .3.9 x 3.6 x 0.1 .Current Measure .6.8 x 7.6 x 0.1 .100 % Eschar .Declined .Notified Family .1/11/2022 . c.L Out (Outer) Mid Foot .Previous Measure .2.6 x 1.9 x 0.1 .Current Measure .6.8 x 2.0 x 0.1 .100% Eschar .Declined .Notified Family .1/11/2022 . d. L Foot Great Toe .Previous Measure .4.4 x 2.4 x 1.3 .Current Measure .4.4 x 2.7 x 2.2 .80% Slough 20% Gra [Granulation] .Declined .Notified Family 1/11/2022 . There was no documentation the family was notified of the decline in status of the pressure injuries on 1/24/2022. During an interview on 6/8/2022 at 1:30 PM, the Interim Director of Nursing (DON) was asked when a patient representative should be informed of a resident's wound status. The Interim DON stated, .well what I expect them to do is let them [representative] know when they [pressure injuries] are found and when they heal . During an interview on 6/8/2022 at 3:42 PM, the Treatment Nurse was asked should the patient representative be notified of any changes in the wound and/or treatments. The Treatment Nurse stated, Yes, they should .
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines, policy review, review of Employee Screening logs and employee time sheets, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines, policy review, review of Employee Screening logs and employee time sheets, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure practices to maintain the spread of infection were maintained when 14 of 47 staff (Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1, #2, #3, and #4, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1, #2, and #3, Housekeeper #1, #2, and #3 and Dietary Aide #1, #2, #3 and #4) failed to complete screening for the prevention and detection of COVID-19 prior to working on 2 of 2 days (5/25/2022 and 5/28/2022) reviewed and when 1 of 4 nurses (LPN #7) failed to properly clean and store enteral feeding syringes after use for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #65 and #75) observed. This had the potential to affect the 90 residents residing in the facility. The findings include: Review of the CDC document titled, Interim Infection Prevention and Control Recommendations for Healthcare Personnel During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic, updated 2/2/2022, revealed .Recommended routine infection prevention and control (IPC) practices during the COVID-19 pandemic .Establish a process to identify anyone entering the facility, regardless of their vaccination status .options could include (but are not limited to) : individual screening on arrival at the facility . Review of the facility's policy titled, E-007 Emergency Plan: COVID -19 Screening, Staff and Visitors, revised 1/2022, revealed .Staff will be screened at the point of entry into the community .Employees and visitors will be screened for signs and symptoms of COVID-19 and denied entry if they exhibit any signs and symptoms . Review of the facility policy titled, Cleaning and Disinfection of Resident-Care Items and Equipment, revised 7/2020, revealed .Reusable Items are cleaned and disinfected or sterilized between residents . Review of the Employee Screening logs and employee time sheets revealed the following employees worked on the following days and failed to screen for signs and symptoms of COVID-19: a. 5/25/2022-CNA #1, #2, #3 and #4, LPN #1 and #2, Housekeeper #1, #2, and #3 and Dietary Aide #1, #2 and #3. b. 5/28/2022-CNA #4, LPN #3, and Dietary Aide #4. During an interview on 6/9/2022 at 10:13 AM, the Interim Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed staff should screen on arrival to work. The Interim DON stated, .Staff and Visitors .everyone who comes in the door should be screened . During an interview on 6/9/2022 at 12:23 PM, the Staff Development Coordinator/Infection Preventionist Nurse confirmed she was unable to locate COVID -19 screenings for CNA #1, #2, #3 and #4, LPN #1 and #2, Housekeeper #1, #2, and #3 and Dietary Aide #1, #2 and #3 on 5/25/2022 and for CNA #4, LPN #3, and Dietary Aide #4 on 5/28/2022. Observation in the resident's room on 6/8/2022 at 9:30 AM, revealed LPN #7 removed an enteral feeding syringe from a plastic bag, checked placement of an enteral feeding tube, and used the enteral feeding syringe to administer medications to Resident #65 through an enteral feeding tube. LPN #7 entered the bathroom, removed the enteral feeding syringe plunger from the barrel, rinsed the plunger and barrel with water, and used a paper towel to wipe off the plunger and the outside of the barrel. LPN #7 then returned the plunger into the barrel and placed the enteral feeding syringe in the plastic bag and placed the plastic bag on the enteral feeding pole at Resident #65's bedside. LPN #7 failed to completely dry the plunger and barrel before reconnecting them and storing the enteral feeding syringe in the plastic bag. Observation in the resident's room on 6/8/2022 at 4:40 PM, revealed during medication administration LPN #7 removed an enteral feeding syringe from a plastic bag on the bedside table, checked placement of an enteral feeding tube, and used the enteral feeding syringe to administer medications to Resident #75. LPN #7 entered the bathroom, removed the enteral feeding syringe plunger from the barrel, rinsed the plunger and barrel, placed them back in the plastic bag, and returned the plastic bag to Resident #75's bedside table. LPN #7 failed to completely dry the plunger and barrel before reconnecting them and storing the enteral feeding syringe in the plastic bag. During an interview on 6/9/2022 at 11:04 AM, LPN #7 was asked how she should have let the plunger dry before placing it back in the plastic bag. LPN #7 stated, .got to air dry .
Jun 2019 7 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the safety of a residen...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the safety of a resident during transfer for 1 of 6 (Resident #35) sampled residents reviewed for accidents. The findings include: 1. The facility's Lifting Machine, Using a Portable policy with a revision date of October 2010 documented, .Preparation .Review the resident's care plan to assess for any special needs of the resident .General Guidelines .The portable lift can be used by one nursing assistant if the resident can participate in the lifting procedures. If not, two (2) nursing assistants will be required to perform the procedure .Documentation .The following information should be recorded in the resident's medical record .Any problems .related to the procedure .Report other information in accordance with facility policy and professional standards of practice . The facility's Fall and Fall Risk, Managing policy with a revision date of November 2017 documented, .Fall Definition .Unintentionally coming to rest on the ground, floor, or other lower level . 2. Medical record review revealed Resident #35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Contracture of Bilateral Knees, Generalized Muscle Weakness, Lack of Coordination, History of Falling, and Dementia. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severe cognition impairment, walking did not occur, required extensive assistance using 2-plus persons for transfers, had functional limitation in range of motion to bilateral lower extremities, moving from seated to standing position did not occur, and was not steady with surface-to-surface transfers. The care plan dated 10/12/18, and last reviewed 6/20/19, documented, .at risk for falls .d/t [due to] impaired mental [status], medications, and physical status Interventions .Provide a mechanical lift for all transfers with the support of 2 staff members. Date Initiated: 06/13/2019 .TRANSFER: Requires staff participation .requires extensive weight bearing assist for all transfers . The interventions that were in place on the care plan prior to the fall on 6/12/19 did not document 1 or 2 persons to assist with transfers. The Progress Notes documented, .6/12/2019 .Nursing Note .Reported by staff that residents [resident's] legs gave out while being transferred using standup lift on the previous shift .swelling to upper left chest region with bruising to the left axilla . The hospital emergency room history and physical dated 6/12/19 documented, .presents with .LEFT ARM, SHOULDER AND LEFT CHEST PAIN, SWELLING AND BRUISING .Musculoskeletal: Proximal upper extremity: Left, anterior, shoulder, arm, tenderness, swelling, erythema, ecchymosis .CT [Computed Tomography] Chest W/ [with] Contrast .10 cm [centimeter] hyperdense lesion along the left pectoralis musculature, with surrounding edema, most compatible with hematoma . The resident required no aggressive treatment and returned to the facility on 6/12/19. The Progress Notes documented, .6/23/2019 .Nursing Note .chest on left side remains swollen and fluid filled . Observations in Resident #35's room on 6/27/19 at 4:15 PM revealed bruising to Resident #35's chest area and the rib cage, and slight swelling to the left shoulder and axilla area. Interview with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #3 on 6/26/19 at 2:00 PM in the Conference Room, revealed CNA #3 was asked how many staff members should be used when transferring a resident with the stand-up lift. CNA #3 stated, Always a 2-person. They always tell us to never use the lift alone. Interview with CNA #4 on 6/26/19 at 2:59 PM, in the Conference Room, revealed CNA #4 was asked what happened while she was transferring Resident #35 using a stand-up lift. CNA #4 stated, I used the stand-up lift to transfer him from the chair to the bed. He did not stand up completely .I put the stand up lift in front of him, hooked him up, and he held on .I raised the lift up, and when he came up in the air, his feet wasn't on the bottom of the lift .a pad goes around him and it hooks about his waist. The other part of the pad hooks around the lift. Part of the pad goes up under his arms .I yelled out in the hall for help, and [Named CNA #2] came to help .he [Resident #35] was hooked on the lift and sitting on the side of the bed I lowered the lift and unhooked him and he was on the side of the bed he never complained pain CNA #4 was asked if she reported the incident to anyone. CNA #4 stated, No . Interview with CNA #2 on 6/26/19 at 3:13 PM in the Conference Room, revealed CNA #2 was asked about the incident with Resident #35 and the use of the lift. CNA #2 stated, When [CNA #4] called for me to come in there and help her, he was like down on the floor already, his legs were on the floor . CNA #2 was asked if Resident #35 could stand. CNA #2 stated, No. I been working with him a long time and I never use the stand up lift. We just transfer him .2-person transfer. CNA #2 was asked if anyone else was in the room helping CNA #4 with him when she attempted to use the stand up lift. CNA #2 stated, No, ma'am, just her. Interview with CNA #2 on 6/26/19 at 3:23 PM across from the 100 Hall Nurses' Station, revealed CNA #2 pointed to the stand-up lift base, and stated, He was like down on the base of the lift .his knees. His arms were like coming through the pad. He was still trying to hold on .We were just trying to keep him from falling and get him on the bed .If they ain't weight bearing, we are not supposed to use it. If they don't have the strength in his legs, it's not safe . Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2 on 6/27/19 at 3:55 PM in the Conference Room, revealed LPN #2 was asked what happened during the incident with the lift with Resident #35. LPN #2 stated, I think they were transferring him from chair to bed . LPN #2 was asked how many staff members should be used to transfer a resident using the lift. LPN #2 stated, 2 persons with all lifts. LPN #2 was asked if only 1 CNA should transfer a resident using the lift alone. LPN #2 stated, No ma'am.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Garbage Disposal (Tag F0814)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on policy review, observation, and interview the facility failed to ensure that waste was disposed of properly for 1 of 1 dumpster observed. The findings include: The facility's Food-Related Gar...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on policy review, observation, and interview the facility failed to ensure that waste was disposed of properly for 1 of 1 dumpster observed. The findings include: The facility's Food-Related Garbage and Rubbish Disposal policy dated November 2017, documented .Outside dumpsters .will be kept closed and free of surrounding litter . Observations of the dumpster on 6/26/19 at 7:56 AM revealed trash on the ground completely surrounding the dumpster. The trash included old used disposable gloves. Observations of the dumpster on 6/26/19 at 6:30 PM revealed the doors of the dumpster partially open with trash bags sticking out and trash, including more than 12 used disposable gloves, scattered on the ground surrounding the dumpster. Observations of the dumpster on 6/27/19 at 7:36 AM revealed the doors of the dumpster partially open with trash bags sticking out and trash scattered around the dumpster. Interview and observation with the Dietary Manager (DM) on 6/27/19 at 7:58 AM in the dumpster area, revealed trash bags sticking out of the dumpster and trash on the ground around the dumpster. The DM was asked if trash should be lying on the ground around the dumpster. The DM stated, No Ma'am. The DM was asked if trash bags should be sticking out of the dumpster. The DM stated, No Ma'am.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0865 (Tag F0865)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation and interview the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to ensure an effective QAPI program, failed to recognize an ongoing environmental concern, and ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation and interview the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee failed to ensure an effective QAPI program, failed to recognize an ongoing environmental concern, and failed to provide effective housekeeping and maintenance services to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable environment. The QAPI committee failed to identify the root cause of the concerns, develop appropriate plans of action, and ensure systems and processes were in place to address the concern. The failure of the QAPI Committee to ensure the facility implemented and provide effective housekeeping services and maintenance services to maintain a sanitary, orderly and comfortable environment for 44 of 57 (101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 117, 118, 119, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 128, 130, 219, 220, 221, 225, 226, 227, 228, 230, 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 241, 244, 245, 246, and 247) resident rooms observed resulted in Substandard Quality of Care. The Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON) were notified of the Substandard Quality of Care on 6/26/19 at 5:15 PM in the Conference Room. The facility was cited F584-F at a scope and severity of Substandard Quality of Care. An extended survey was conducted on 6/26/19. The noncompliance continues at F584-F for monitoring of effectiveness of the corrective actions. The findings include: Interview with the Housekeeping District Manager on 6/26/19 at 11:20 AM, in the Conference Room, revealed the Housekeeping District Manager stated he took over this facility in May. The Housekeeping District Manager was asked what problems he had identified in May. He stated, .build up on the floors .walls, dirt build up .cleaning schedules weren't being followed, no systems in place .the quality control inspection was not being followed . Interview with the Administrator on 6/26/19 at 5:15 PM in the Conference Room, revealed the Administrator had been in the administrative position since October 2018. The Administrator was asked what problems he had identified in October. He stated, Flooring, roof, rooms, it was dirty .problems were here for years .rooms were in bad shape .they still look bad, roof has to get fixed .flooring .don't even like to look at it, we know it's got to come out . Interview with the Maintenance Supervisor on 6/27/19 at 9:41 AM, in the Conference Room, revealed the Maintenance Supervisor was asked what problems he had identified in the building. He stated, .we have a lot of issues with the roof, the ceiling, with them being wet .we've got pinholes everywhere [in the copper water lines in the ceiling] .the bathroom wall situation, that's from moisture .old floors .wall damage . Telephone interview with the Corporate Director of Plant Operations on 6/27/19 at 11:02 AM, revealed the Corporate Director of Plant Operations was asked what environmental problems he had identified in the building. The Corporate Director of Plant Operations stated he assumed his position in January and further stated, .We came down to look at .copper lines .had multiple saddle repair [pipe] clamps .pipe over the nurse's station had a number of saddle clamp repairs. We made the conclusion that the pipe was reaching its end and deteriorating. The Corporate Director of Plant Operations was asked when he was made aware of the problems and he stated, .the Maintenance Director told me about it in February .it wasn't a dire issue in February . The Corporate Director of Plant Operations was asked who monitors the work provided by the contracted Housekeeping Services. The Corporate Director of Plant Operations stated, .What I understand was that the Administrator will walk around and grade them and make adjustments from there. The Corporate Director of Plant Operations was asked how Corporate ensures the Administrator was monitoring the housekeeping services. The Corporate Director of Plant Operations stated, I don't have an answer for that. Interview with the Administrator on 6/27/19 at 1:51 PM, in the Administrator Office, revealed the Administrator was asked what he had identified as a concern in QA. The Administrator stated, .I had a plan in January for new floors but it got stopped .they have had a lot of turn over .lots of things didn't get done . 1. The QAPI Committee failed to identify and correct concerns to provide effective housekeeping and maintenance services to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable environment for 44 of 57 (101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 117, 118, 119, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 128, 130, 219, 220, 221, 225, 226, 227, 228, 230, 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 241, 244, 245, 246, and 247) resident rooms observed which resulted in Substandard Quality of Care. Refer to F584. 2. The Facility's QAPI committee failed to develop and implement appropriate plans of action to ensure a sanitary and comfortable environment for 44 of 57 (101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 117, 118, 119, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 128, 130, 219, 220, 221, 225, 226, 227, 228, 230, 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 241, 244, 245, 246, and 247) resident rooms observed which resulted in Substandard Quality of Care. Refer to F584.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure practices to prevent th...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure practices to prevent the potential spread of infection were maintained when 3 of 3 (Wound Care Nurse, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #5, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1) staff members failed to perform proper hand hygiene during 3 of 3 (Resident #7, #21, and #41) observations of provision of care and dirty linens were left on the bathroom floor in 1 of 3 (100 Hall Central Bath) shower rooms and 1 of 42 (room [ROOM NUMBER]) resident room bathrooms. The findings include: 1. The facility's Handwashing/Hand Hygiene policy with a revision date of April 2010 documented, .This facility considers hand hygiene the primary means to prevent the spread of infections .Employees must wash their hands .Before and after direct contact with residents .After removing gloves .The use of gloves does not replace handwashing/hand hygiene . 2. Medical record review revealed Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Hypertension, Contractures, Dementia with Behavioral Disturbance, Anemia, Pressure Ulcer of Right Hip, Pressure Ulcer of Left Buttock, and Anxiety. Observation in Resident #7's room on 6/20/19 at 11:05 AM revealed the Wound Care Nurse performing a dressing change on Resident #7 with the assistance of CNA #5. The Wound Care Nurse removed the dressing from the Stage 3 (full thickness skin loss) pressure ulcer on the left gluteal fold, cleaned the open wound with wound cleanser, patted the wound dry, applied skin prep and Calazime Skin Protectant around the wound using the same gloved hands. The Wound Care Nurse then removed her gloves and donned clean gloves without performing hand hygiene, and applied a clean dressing over the wound. The Wound Care Nurse did not perform hand hygiene and change gloves between cleaning the wound and applying a clean treatment to the wound. The Wound Care Nurse did not perform hand hygiene after removal of her gloves and before donning clean gloves. Continued observation revealed CNA #5 pushed the edge of Resident #7's brief down, and revealed a small amount of feces oozing from the brief and onto CNA #5's glove. CNA #5 then pressed down the edges of the clean dressing with the same gloved hand without changing the soiled glove. The Wound Care Nurse then removed a dressing from the Stage 3 pressure ulcer to the right hip, cleaned the wound with wound cleanser, patted the wound dry, applied skin prep and Calazime Skin Protectant around the wound edges using the same gloves. The Wound Care Nurse did not perform hand hygiene and change gloves between cleaning the wound and applying a clean treatment to the wound. 3. Medical record review revealed Resident #41 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of Osteomyelitis, Dysphagia, Adult Failure to Thrive, Parkinson's Disease, Protein Calorie Malnutrition, and Dysphagia. Observation in Resident's #41's room on 6/20/19 at 1:00 PM revealed the Wound Care Nurse performing a dressing change on Resident #41. The Wound Care Nurse cleaned the sacral wound, removed her gloves, and donned new gloves without performing hand hygiene. The Wound Care Nurse cleaned the left hip wound, washed her hands, donned a new pair of gloves, and placed Alginate into the wound bed using a cotton swab. The Wound Care Nurse then covered the left hip with a clean dressing and removed her gloves. The Wound Care Nurse did not perform hand hygiene. The Wound Care Nurse covered Resident #41 with a blanket, picked up the bed remote, and raised the head of the bed without performing hand hygiene. The Wound Care Nurse used her bare hands to partially remove Resident #41's left sock, went to the medication cart, picked up a hand held mirror, looked at the bottom of Resident #41's heel, and then placed a new glove on her right hand, without performing hand hygiene. The Wound Care Nurse picked up the wound barrier and placed it into the biohazard bag, and removed her glove and donned clean gloves without performing hand hygiene after removal of the gloves. The Wound Care Nurse then removed Resident's cover again, turned Resident #41 to her left side, removed the right hip dressing and applied a new cover dressing over the right hip wound. The Wound Care Nurse removed her gloves and covered the resident with a blanket using her bare hands without performing hand hygiene. The Wound Care Nurse failed to wash her hands between glove changes, between dirty and clean dressings, and before direct contact with the resident. 4. Medical record review revealed Resident #21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of Diabetes, Heart Failure, Alzheimer's, Dementia, Anxiety, Depression, Hypertension, Peripheral Vascular Disease, Osteoarthritis, and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Observations in Resident #21's room on 6/25/19 at 2:04 PM revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 cleaned Resident #21's buttock area with disposable wipes, changed gloves without performing hand hygiene, and then applied Calazime Skin Protectant cream to the coccyx/sacrum/buttocks areas. LPN #1 then cleaned the scrotum and groin area with disposable wipes and applied Calazime Skin Protectant cream to these areas using the same gloved hands. LPN #1 assisted Resident #21 to reposition himself in bed, repositioned the 3 pillows behind his head, and used his bed remote to raise his head of bed, still wearing the same gloves. LPN #1 then removed her gloves and performed hand hygiene at the sink in Resident #21's room. LPN #1 turned off the faucet with the same paper towel she used to dry her hands. Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 6/27/19 at 11:34 AM in the conference room, revealed the DON was asked if a resident had a soiled brief on, should the staff change the brief before performing wound care. The DON stated, Yes ma'am. The DON was asked when the nurse should perform hand hygiene during wound care. The DON stated, Before beginning, before gloves, when changing gloves in between, and at the end of wound care. The DON was asked when staff should perform hand hygiene during perineal care. The DON stated, Before beginning, before putting gloves on, after removal of soiled items. They should wash hands and put on new gloves and wash again after they take them off. 5. Observations in room [ROOM NUMBER]'s bathroom on 6/24/19 at 9:41 AM revealed a dirty, crumpled towel and washcloth on the floor beside the toilet. Observations in the 100 Hall Shower Room on 6/25/19 at 8:06 AM revealed dirty, wet towels on the floor. Interview with CNA #6 on 6/24/19 at 9:42 AM in room [ROOM NUMBER]'s bathroom, revealed CNA #6 was asked if the dirty towel and washcloth should be on the bathroom floor. CNA #6 stated, No ma'am, they shouldn't .
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0921)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 2 (100 Hall Dayroom) dayrooms, 2 of 2 (100 Hall and 200 Hall) halls, and 3 of 3 (100 hall Central Shower, Secure Unit Women's Sho...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 2 (100 Hall Dayroom) dayrooms, 2 of 2 (100 Hall and 200 Hall) halls, and 3 of 3 (100 hall Central Shower, Secure Unit Women's Shower, and Secure Unit Men's Shower) shower rooms were clean and sanitary. The findings include: 1. Observations in the 100 Hall Dayroom on 6/24/19 at 9:12 AM, 11:39 AM, 2:49 PM, 6/25/19 at 8:04 AM, and 3:38 PM, and on 6/26/19 at 7:46 AM revealed black streaks on the floor, brown debris, stains and scattered debris on the floor. The windows were cloudy and smeared with a grayish white substance between the dayroom and the nurses' station. Interview with the Housekeeping District Manager on 6/27/19 at 10:16 AM in the Conference Room, revealed the Housekeeping District Manager was asked if the common areas and dayrooms should be kept clean and sanitary. The Housekeeping District Manager stated, Yes. 2. Observations in the 100 Hall on 6/24/19 at 7:55 AM, 9:10 AM, 11:45 AM, 2:23 PM, 6/25/19 at 8:01 AM, 3:25 PM, and on 6/26/19 at 7:46 AM revealed brown debris, brownish-black stained areas, and scattered debris throughout the entire hall. Interview with the Housekeeping District Manager on 6/25/19 at 3:33 PM in the 100 Hall, revealed the Housekeeping District Manager was asked if the 100 Hall was clean and sanitary. The Housekeeping District Manager confirmed the hall was not clean. 3. Observations in the 200 Hall beginning on 6/24/19 at 7:54 AM, 2:23 PM, and on 6/25/19 at 2:15 PM and 4:15 PM revealed brown debris, clear red stained areas, a sticky clear brown substance, and scattered debris on the floor. Interview with the Housekeeping District Manager on 6/25/19 at 4:36 PM in the 200 Hall, revealed the Housekeeping District Manager was asked if the 200 Hall was clean and sanitary. The Housekeeping District Manager confirmed the 200 Hall was not clean and sanitary and stated, We replaced the Housekeeping Supervisor and the Regional Supervisor within the last 3 to 4 weeks because of the condition of this building. 4. Observations in the 100 Hall Central Shower on 6/24/19 at 9:51 AM, 6/25/19 at 8:06 AM, 2:30 PM, and 4:33 PM revealed broken tile, missing shower curtains in the shower stalls, dark black substance in the corners of the shower stall to the right, a discolored nonskid strip and a spider web in the corner of the left shower stall, a dripping shower head in the back left shower stall. There was a large amount of dark greenish black build-up on the tiles and in the grout of the shower wall, extending down to a large area of dark greenish black substance on the floor of the shower, below the shower head, and the shower had rusty shower fixtures. Interview with the Maintenance Supervisor, Housekeeping District Manager, and the Administrator on 6/25/19 at 4:35 PM in the 100 Hall Central Shower, revealed the Maintenance Supervisor was asked if broken tile should be present. He stated, No. The Housekeeping District Manager confirmed the showers were not clean. The Housekeeping District Manager was asked if a large amount of dark greenish black build-up on the tiles below the shower head and in the grout of the shower wall extending down to the floor of the shower should be present in the showers. The Housekeeping District Manager stated, No. The Housekeeping District Manager confirmed the nonskid strip was not clean and needed to be replaced. The Housekeeping District Manager confirmed the shower curtains were missing and needed to be replaced. The Maintenance Supervisor and the Administrator confirmed that the fixtures should be replaced. Interview with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #7 on 6/26/19 at 1:56 PM in the Conference Room, revealed CNA #7 was asked if the 100 Hall Central Shower Room was clean. She confirmed she had been concerned about the back left shower stall. She stated, .look like mold .all around the edges of the shower room floor. I have noticed some tiles missing. I think they know about it . Interview with CNA #4 on 6/26/19 at 2:59 PM in the Conference Room, revealed CNA #4 was asked if the 100 Hall Central Shower was clean and sanitary. She confirmed it was not clean and stated, It's clean maybe once a week, then that shower stall [back left] has mildew or mold in the floor, and it's been there since I been here 2 years. It's like a dark green black color, it's like what it looks like in the ceiling where the mold is throughout the halls. Maintenance knows. 5. Observations in the Secure Unit Women's Shower Room on 6/25/19 at 5:52 PM, and on 6/26/19 at 11:10 AM revealed a brown round formed substance in the shower, a musty odor, and a non-functioning light. 6. Observations in the 200 Hall Men's Shower Room on 6/25/19 at 5:52 PM, and on 6/26/19 at 11:14 AM revealed broken tile, a black substance in the grout and in the corners of the shower stall, and the walls had broken and missing tile. Interview with Housekeeper #1 on 6/27/19 at 8:19 AM in the Conference Room, revealed Housekeeper #1 was asked if the greenish black substance in the corners, on the tiles and on the floor of the showers should be present. Housekeeper #1 stated, No, Ma'am .it's been there a long time . Telephone interview with the Director of Plant Operations on 6/27/19 at 11:20 AM, revealed the Director of Plant Operations was asked if residents have the right to shower in a shower room that is clean and in good repair. The Director of Plant Operations stated, Absolutely.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0584)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on Service Agreement review, policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide effective housekeep...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on Service Agreement review, policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide effective housekeeping services and maintenance services to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable environment as evidenced by missing ceiling tiles, missing grout in tiles, brown debris and brownish and black build-up on the floors and in corners of rooms, unpainted, exposed plaster, brownish build-up on window ledges, blinds, and air conditioners, air conditioners with missing pieces, discolored grout in bathrooms, worn linoleum floors exposing subflooring, gray areas on ceiling tiles, unclean, broken and rust colered resident equipment, unclean exhaust fans, brown substance and stains in sinks and on commodes, holes in walls, loose and broken tiles and base boards, bulging and crumbling dry wall, odors, gouged and scratched walls, peeling paint; corroded faucets, missing covers on lights, an improperly hanging door, and mismatched floor tiles in 44 of 57 (101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 117, 118, 119, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 128, 130, 219, 220, 221, 225, 226, 227, 228, 230, 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 241, 244, 245, 246, and 247) resident rooms observed. The facility's failure to provide effective housekeeping services and maintenance services to maintain a sanitary, orderly and comfortable environment resulted in Substandard Quality of Care. The Extended Survey was conducted on 6/26/19. The findings include: 1. The facility's HOUSEKEEPING/LAUNDRY SERVICE AGREEMENT dated January 1, 2011 and signed 1/6/11 and 1/10/11, documented, .[Named Corporation] will provide .Monthly unit inspections and regular District Manager visits . The (Named Corporation) Housekeeping Procedures policy with a revision date of 6/2016, documented .BATHROOM CLEANING .Dust mop. Pick up trash .Sanitize sinks .Sanitize commode, tank, bowl and base. Use brush for inside of bowl .Spot clean - Walls .Damp mop .Clean vents .DAILY PATIENT ROOM CLEANING .With a cloth & [and] disinfectant wipe all horizontal (flat) surfaces .spot clean all vertical surfaces .Use dust mop and gather all trash and debris .Damp mop floor .Every room to be cleaned is that resident's home .COMPLETE ROOM CLEANING .Every room must be Deep Cleaned at least 1x [time]/[per] month . 2. Observations on the 100 Hall on 6/24/19 beginning at 4:42 PM, 6/25/19 beginning at 8:22 AM, 1:50 PM, and 3:20 PM revealed the following: a. room [ROOM NUMBER] - A missing ceiling tile, missing grout around the edge of the floor tile in the bathroom, a black substance in the corners of the room, and unpainted, exposed plaster. Interview with the Administrator, Housekeeping District Manager, and the Maintenance Supervisor on 6/25/19 at 3:22 PM in room [ROOM NUMBER], revealed the Maintenance Supervisor confirmed the missing ceiling tile and the missing grout around the edge of the floor tile in the bathroom. The Maintenance Supervisor looked at the unpainted, exposed plaster and stated, Needs some paint. The Housekeeping District Manager was asked if the black substance should be present in the corners of the room. He stated, No, Ma'am . b. room [ROOM NUMBER] - [NAME] debris on the floor in the corner behind the door, pictures in the floor behind the first bed, brown build-up in the air conditioner, plastic pieces of the air conditioner unit were missing, and the flooring was worn away exposing some of the subflooring next to the wall in the room, and a black substance in the grout in the bathroom. Interview with the Administrator, Housekeeping District Manager, and the Maintenance Supervisor on 6/25/19 at 3:24 PM in room [ROOM NUMBER], revealed the Housekeeping District Manager confirmed the floor was not clean. The Maintenance Supervisor was asked if the air conditioner was clean and in good repair. The Maintenance Supervisor stated, Part of this is broken off .no. The Maintenance Supervisor was asked if the black substance in the grout and the exposed subflooring should be present. The Maintenance Supervisor stated, No. c. room [ROOM NUMBER] - Areas in the linoleum were worn, exposing the subflooring, and a sticky film was covering the floor. Interview with the Administrator, Housekeeping District Manager, and the Maintenance Supervisor on 6/25/19 at 3:26 PM in room [ROOM NUMBER], revealed the Housekeeping District Manager was asked if the floor was clean and in good repair. He stated, No, it's old and torn. The Administrator was asked if the linoleum should be worn exposing the subflooring. He stated, No. d. room [ROOM NUMBER] - Worn areas in the linoleum that exposed a large amount of the subflooring, and brown build-up on the blinds and the air conditioner. Interview with the Administrator, Housekeeping District Manager, and the Maintenance Supervisor on 6/25/19 at 3:29 PM in room [ROOM NUMBER], revealed the Housekeeping District Manager was asked if the blinds and the floor were clean and in good repair. The Housekeeping District Manager confirmed the blinds were not clean and stated, Those are holes in the linoleum. The Maintenance Supervisor was asked if the air conditioner was clean and in good repair. The Maintenance Supervisor stated, No. e. room [ROOM NUMBER] - [NAME] debris behind the door and in the corners of the room. f. room [ROOM NUMBER] - [NAME] debris in the corners of the room. g. room [ROOM NUMBER] - A brown build-up on the air conditioner, a gray discoloration on the ceiling tile in the bathroom, a broken armrest on a raised toilet seat in the bathroom, and a thick layer of blue masking tape covering the bathroom door handle. Interview with the Administrator, Housekeeping District Manager, and the Maintenance Supervisor on 6/25/19 at 3:35 PM in room [ROOM NUMBER], revealed the Maintenance Supervisor confirmed the air conditioner was not clean and confirmed the gray discoloration on the ceiling in the bathroom. The Maintenance Supervisor was asked if residents should use broken raised toilet seats. The Maintenance Supervisor stated, No. The Maintenance Supervisor removed the layers of blue masking tape and stated, .that shouldn't be there . h. room [ROOM NUMBER] - A brown build-up on the air conditioner, and a rectangular piece of wood lying on the floor behind the resident's bed. Interview with the Administrator, Housekeeping District Manager, and the Maintenance Supervisor on 6/25/19 at 3:37 PM, in room [ROOM NUMBER], revealed the Maintenance Supervisor confirmed the air conditioner was not clean. The Maintenance Supervisor was asked why a wooden board was lying on the floor behind the resident's bed. The Maintenance Supervisor stated, To keep them from knocking the bed into the wall. i. room [ROOM NUMBER] - [NAME] debris on the window ledge, brown build-up on the air conditioner, a bracket missing from the air conditioner unit with wires exposed. The commode tank was covered with an incomparable lid that did not properly fit over the tank, exposing the tank, and debris on the exhaust fan in the bathroom Interview with the Administrator, Housekeeping District Manager, and the Maintenance Supervisor on 6/25/19 at 3:39 PM, in room [ROOM NUMBER], revealed the Housekeeping District Manager confirmed the floor was not clean. The Maintenance Supervisor was asked if the air conditioner was clean and in good repair. The Maintenance Supervisor stated, No .it needs to be bolted to the wall. The Maintenance Supervisor confirmed the commode tank lid was not the appropriate size, and confirmed the exhaust fan was not clean. j. room [ROOM NUMBER] - [NAME] debris on the floor throughout the room. k. room [ROOM NUMBER] - [NAME] debris along the baseboard throughout the room. l. room [ROOM NUMBER] - Scattered brown debris on the floor and in the corners, a call light and call light cord were covered in a brown substance. The vinyl baseboard was missing and the dry wall was exposed and rough with pieces of dry wall in the floor. Interview with the Administrator, Housekeeping District Manager, and the Maintenance Supervisor on 6/25/19 at 3:43 PM in room [ROOM NUMBER], revealed the Housekeeping District Manager confirmed the floor was not clean. The Housekeeping Manager was asked if the call light was clean. The Housekeeping District Manager stated, No. The Maintenance Supervisor was asked if there should be missing vinyl cove base molding and crumbling dry wall. The Maintenance Supervisor stated, No. m. room [ROOM NUMBER] - Rust colored build-up on the overbed table, and scattered brown debris on the floor and in the corners of the room. n. room [ROOM NUMBER] - Rust colored build-up on the overbed table, and scattered brown debris on the floor throughout the room. o. room [ROOM NUMBER] - Scattered brown debris on the floor throughout the room. p. room [ROOM NUMBER] - [NAME] debris scattered on the floor throughout the room, brown spots on the floor in front of the closet, a dead fly, and brown debris on the window ledge. Interview with the Administrator, Housekeeping District Manager, and the Maintenance Supervisor on 6/25/19 at 3:46 PM in room [ROOM NUMBER], the Housekeeping District Manager was asked if the floor and window ledge were clean. The Housekeeping District Manager stated, No. q. room [ROOM NUMBER] - The base of an overbed table had brown build-up, brown stains in the toilet, and a hole in the wall in the bathroom where a paper towel holder previously had been on the wall. Interview with the Administrator, Housekeeping District Manager, and the Maintenance Supervisor on 6/25/19 at 3:48 PM in room [ROOM NUMBER], revealed the Housekeeping District Manager was asked if the overbed table base should be not be clean and if there should be brown stains in the toilet. The Housekeeping District Manager stated, No. The Administrator looked at the hole in the bathroom wall and stated, Who did that? Gees! r. room [ROOM NUMBER] - Grayish-black areas on the floor throughout the room s. room [ROOM NUMBER] - Grayish-black areas on the floor throughout the room near the bed, peeling paint and damaged exposed drywall on the wall behind the first bed, a large, round, gray area on the ceiling, brown stains in the toilet, a corroded sink faucet, and a black substance scattered on the bathroom floor. Interview with the Administrator, Housekeeping District Manager, and the Maintenance Supervisor on 6/25/19 at 3:55 PM in room [ROOM NUMBER], revealed the Housekeeping District Manager confirmed the floors in the room and bathroom were not clean and confirmed the brown stains in the toilet. The Maintenance Supervisor confirmed the large, round, gray area on the ceiling and looked at the sink faucet and stated, It is corroded. The Maintenance Supervisor was asked if the peeling paint and damaged exposed drywall were acceptable. The Maintenance Supervisor stated, No. t. room [ROOM NUMBER] - [NAME] build-up on the air conditioner and the vented front of the air conditioner was loose. There were large, round, gray areas on 2 bulging ceiling tiles with in the bathroom, a musty smell in the bathroom, a large area of bulging dry wall behind the commode, and no cover on the bathroom light, exposing a bare light bulb. Interview with the Administrator, Housekeeping District Manager, and the Maintenance Supervisor on 6/25/19 at 4:07 PM in room [ROOM NUMBER], revealed the Maintenance Supervisor was asked if the air conditioner was clean and in good repair. The Maintenance Supervisor stated, No. The Housekeeping District Manager walked in the bathroom and stated, .smells musty. The Maintenance Supervisor confirmed the bulging ceiling tiles on the bathroom ceiling tiles and the bulging dry wall and stated, It has been wet at one time. The Maintenance Supervisor confirmed there should be a cover over the light bulb. u. room [ROOM NUMBER] - The linoleum floor near the first bed was worn exposing a large area of subfloor. There were brown substances on the floor throughout the room, a brown build-up on the air conditioner, and a loose screw lying on the window ledge. Interview with the Administrator, Housekeeping District Manager, and the Maintenance Supervisor on 6/25/19 at 4:05 PM in room [ROOM NUMBER], revealed the Housekeeping District Manager was asked if the floor was clean and in good repair. The Housekeeping District Manager stated, No. The Maintenance Supervisor confirmed the air conditioner was not clean and looked at the screw and stated, .doesn't need to be there. v. room [ROOM NUMBER] - areas of a brownish substance on the floor throughout the room, an odor in the room, large, round, gray areas on the ceiling tile, and dry wall bulging up on the wall beside the commode. Interview with the Administrator, Housekeeping District Manager, and the Maintenance Supervisor on 6/25/19 at 3:52 PM in room [ROOM NUMBER], revealed the Housekeeping District Manager confirmed the floor was not clean. The Maintenance Supervisor stated, It doesn't smell very clean. The Maintenance Supervisor confirmed the gray areas on the ceiling tile and the dry wall bulging up beside the toilet and stated, It's been wet. The Administrator touched the wall and confirmed it felt damp. w. room [ROOM NUMBER] - Areas of a brown build-up on the floor throughout the room and a dried, red substance on the floor near the bed, a brown build-up on the blinds and on the air conditioner and plastic parts of the air conditioning unit missing. There was veneer missing down the front right side of the 3 drawer bedside chest, no cover on the bathroom light, exposing a bare light bulb, and a corroded sink faucet. Interview with the Administrator, Housekeeping District Manager, and the Maintenance Supervisor on 6/25/19 at 4:02 PM in room [ROOM NUMBER], revealed the Housekeeping District Manager confirmed the floor and the blinds were not clean. The Maintenance Supervisor was asked if the air conditioner was clean and in good repair. The Maintenance Supervisor stated, No. The Maintenance Supervisor was asked if the 3 drawer chest was in good repair. The Maintenance Supervisor said, No. The Maintenance Supervisor confirmed that a cover was needed over the bathroom light bulb and confirmed the sink faucet was corroded. x. room [ROOM NUMBER] - Areas of brown build-up on the floor throughout the room and on the air conditioner and the air conditioning unit was not securely attached to the wall. The drywall was bulging on the wall to the right of the bathroom commode. Interview with the Administrator, Housekeeping District Manager, and the Maintenance Supervisor on 6/25/19 at 3:57 PM in room [ROOM NUMBER], revealed the Housekeeping District Manager confirmed the floor was not clean. The Maintenance Supervisor confirmed the drywall was bulging and stated, [It was due to] a leaky roof. The Maintenance Supervisor was asked if the air conditioner was clean and in good repair. The Maintenance Supervisor stated, No, and confirmed it should be securely attached to the wall. y. room [ROOM NUMBER] - A metal office chair with the back rest of the chair missing, and the seat was torn with jagged edges of material, exposing the inner foam. Interview with the Administrator, Housekeeping District Manager, and the Maintenance Supervisor on 6/25/19 at 3:59 PM in room [ROOM NUMBER], revealed the Administrator looked at the chair and stated, It should be thrown out. z. room [ROOM NUMBER] - Areas of brown build-up on the floor mats in the room and brown build-up on the air conditioner. There were plastic pieces missing from the air conditioning unit, 2 holes in the wall above the bed, and the dry wall was bulging beside the air conditioner. Interview with the Administrator, Housekeeping District Manager, and the Maintenance Supervisor on 6/25/19 at 4:09 PM in room [ROOM NUMBER], revealed the Housekeeping District Manager was asked if the floor mats were clean. The Housekeeping District Manager stated, I don't think so . The Maintenance Director was asked if the air conditioner was clean and in good repair. The Maintenance Director stated, No. The Maintenance Director was asked if the dry wall should be bulging next to the air conditioner and should there be holes in the wall. The Maintenance Director stated, No. 3. Observations on the 200 Hall on 6/24/19 beginning at 9:20 AM and 4:22 PM, and on 6/25/19 beginning at 8:02 AM and 4:43 PM revealed the following: a. room [ROOM NUMBER] - Yellowish brown stains in the sink. Interview with the Administrator, Housekeeping District Manager, and the Maintenance Supervisor on 6/25/19 at 4:45 PM in room [ROOM NUMBER], revealed the Housekeeping District Manager was asked if there should be stains in the sink. The Housekeeping District Manager stated, No . b. room [ROOM NUMBER] - Areas of brown build-up on the floor throughout the room. c. room [ROOM NUMBER] - Areas of brown build-up on the floor throughout the room, a dried white substance on the mirror, and a brown substance smeared on the commode. Interview with the Administrator, Housekeeping District Manager, and the Maintenance Supervisor on 6/25/19 at 4:50 PM in room [ROOM NUMBER], revealed the Housekeeping District Manager was asked if the mirror and commode were clean. He stated, No. The Housekeeping District Manager was asked if the floor was clean. He stated, .wax build-up. j. room [ROOM NUMBER] - [NAME] build-up on the blinds and the air conditioner. The commode seat was loose and falling off the commode in the bathroom. k. room [ROOM NUMBER] - [NAME] build-up on the air conditioner. The entire front vented section of the air conditioning unit was missing exposing the inner contents of the air conditioner, and brown build-up on the blinds. Interview with the Administrator, Housekeeping District Manager, and the Maintenance Supervisor on 6/25/19 at 5:15 PM in room [ROOM NUMBER], revealed the Maintenance Supervisor was asked if the air conditioner was clean and in good repair. The Maintenance Supervisor stated, No. The Housekeeping District Manager confirmed the blinds were not clean. l. room [ROOM NUMBER] -Areas of brown build-up on the floor throughout the room, brown build-up on the blinds, broken blinds, brown build-up on the window ledge and on the air conditioner. Interview with the Administrator, Housekeeping District Manager, and the Maintenance Supervisor on 6/25/19 at 5:17 PM in room [ROOM NUMBER], revealed the Housekeeping District Manager confirmed the floor, blinds, and window ledge were not clean. The Housekeeping District Manager was asked if the blinds were in good repair. He stated, No, they are broken. The Maintenance Supervisor confirmed the air conditioner was not clean. m. room [ROOM NUMBER] - An exposed pipe under the sink that was wrapped in bright orange foam and black duct tape, 2 broken tiles lying under the sink on the floor, brown build-up on the blinds, and broken blinds on the windows. Interview with the Administrator, Housekeeping District Manager, and the Maintenance Supervisor on 6/25/19 at 5:21 PM in room [ROOM NUMBER], revealed the Maintenance Supervisor was asked if there should be exposed pipe under the sink covered in bright orange foam and black duct tape. The Maintenance Supervisor stated, No. The Maintenance Supervisor was asked if tiles should be falling off the wall and lying on the floor. The Maintenance Supervisor stated, No. The Housekeeping District Manager was asked if the blinds were clean and in good repair. The Housekeeping District Manager stated, No. n. room [ROOM NUMBER] - Areas of a brown substance on the floor throughout the room, brown build-up on the blinds and on the air conditioner, and plastic parts of the air conditioning unit were missing. Interview with the Administrator, Housekeeping District Manager, and the Maintenance Supervisor on 6/25/19 at 5:27 PM in room [ROOM NUMBER], revealed the Housekeeping District Manager confirmed the floor and blinds were not clean. The Maintenance Supervisor was asked if the air conditioner was clean and in good repair. The Maintenance Supervisor stated, No. o. room [ROOM NUMBER] - Areas of a brown substance on the floor throughout the room, brown build-up on the window ledge and on the air conditioner, and the floor tiles did not match. Interview with the Administrator, Housekeeping District Manager, and the Maintenance Supervisor on 6/25/19 at 5:30 PM in room [ROOM NUMBER], revealed the Housekeeping District Manager confirmed the floor and window ledge were not clean. The Administrator confirmed the floor tiles did not match and stated, It's not homelike. p. room [ROOM NUMBER] - A strong odor in the room, brown build-up on the air conditioner and plastic parts of the air conditioning unit were missing. Interview with the Administrator, Housekeeping District Manager, and the Maintenance Supervisor on 6/25/19 at 5:30 PM in room [ROOM NUMBER], revealed the Housekeeping District Manager stated, Smells like urine in here. The Maintenance Supervisor was asked if the air conditioner was clean and in good repair. The Maintenance Supervisor stated, No. q. room [ROOM NUMBER] - Peeling paint and broken, bulging drywall between the bathroom and sink. r. room [ROOM NUMBER] - The drywall in the bathroom was bulging. There was a brown stain on the wall next to the toilet. The tile was separating from the wall in the bathroom, and there were stains in the commode. Interview with the Administrator, Housekeeping District Manager, and the Maintenance Supervisor on 6/25/19 at 5:00 PM in room [ROOM NUMBER], revealed the Maintenance Supervisor was asked if there should be bulging dry wall, stained walls, and tiles separating from the wall. The Maintenance Supervisor stated, No. The Housekeeping District Manager confirmed the commode was not clean. s. room [ROOM NUMBER] - There was a hole approximately the circumference of an empty toilet paper roll above the toilet in the bathroom that was covered with a toilet paper roll to hide the insulation. Interview with the Administrator, Housekeeping District Manager, and the Maintenance Supervisor on 6/25/19 at 5:05 PM in room [ROOM NUMBER], revealed the Maintenance Supervisor was asked if there should be a hole in the bathroom wall, exposing insulation, with a toilet paper roll covering it. The Maintenance Supervisor stated, No. t. room [ROOM NUMBER] - Areas of a brown substance on the floor throughout the room, several tiles separating from the base of the bathroom wall near the floor, and dry wall bulging in the bathroom. u. room [ROOM NUMBER] - The entry door was scraping the floor when opened or closed, making it difficult to open and close the door. Interview with the Administrator, Housekeeping District Manager, and the Maintenance Supervisor on 6/25/19 at 5:10 PM in room [ROOM NUMBER], revealed the Administrator confirmed the door needed to be readjusted. v. room [ROOM NUMBER] - [NAME] stains in the commode, brown build-up in the bathroom sink. Interview with the Administrator, Housekeeping District Manager, and the Maintenance Supervisor on 6/25/19 at 4:55 PM in room [ROOM NUMBER], revealed the Housekeeping District Manager was asked if there should be brown stains in the toilet and brown build-up in the bathroom sink. The Housekeeping District Manager stated, No. w. room [ROOM NUMBER] - Areas of a brown substance on the floor throughout the room and in the corners of the room, brown build-up on the blinds, a brown stain in the sink, several loose tiles in the bathroom floor, and large brown stains on the ceiling tiles. Interview with the Administrator, Housekeeping District Manager, and the Maintenance Supervisor on 6/25/19 at 5:30 PM in room [ROOM NUMBER], revealed the Housekeeping District Manager confirmed the floor and corners were not clean, and the sink was stained. The Maintenance Supervisor was asked if there should be large brown stains on the ceiling tiles. The Maintenance Supervisor stated, No. x. room [ROOM NUMBER] - There was brown build-up on the air conditioner. The bathroom sink faucet was rusted, and there was a brown stain in the commode. Interview with the Administrator, Housekeeping District Manager, and the Maintenance Supervisor on 6/25/19 at 5:32 PM in room [ROOM NUMBER], revealed the Maintenance Supervisor confirmed the air conditioner was not clean. The Maintenance Supervisor was asked if the faucet should be rusted. He stated, No. The Housekeeping District Manager was asked if the toilet should have brown stains. The Housekeeping District Manager stated, No. 3. Interview with the Housekeeping District Manager on 6/26/19 at 11:20 AM, in the Conference Room, revealed the Housekeeping District Manager stated he took over this facility in May. The Housekeeping District Manager was asked what problems he had identified in May. He stated, .build up on the floors .walls, dirt build up .cleaning schedules weren't being followed, no systems in place .the quality control inspection was not being followed . Interview with the Administrator on 6/26/19 at 5:15 PM, in the Conference Room, revealed the Administrator stated that he had been in the administrative position since October 2018. The Administrator was asked what problems he had identified in October. He stated, Flooring, roof, rooms, it was dirty .problems were here for years .rooms were in bad shape .they still look bad, roof has to get fixed .flooring .don't even like to look at it, we know it's got to come out . The Administrator was asked why these problems have not been addressed. The Administrator stated, .corporate .approval process . Interview with the Maintenance Supervisor on 6/27/19 at 9:41 AM, in the Conference Room, revealed the Maintenance Supervisor was asked what problems he had identified in the building. He stated, .we have a lot of issues with the roof, the ceiling, with them being wet .we've got pinholes everywhere [in the copper water lines in the ceiling] .the bathroom wall situation, that's from moisture .old floors .wall damage . Telephone interview with the Corporate Director of Plant Operations on 6/27/19 at 11:02 AM, the Corporate Director of Plant Operations was asked what environmental problems he had identified in the building. The Corporate Director of Plant Operations said that he started his position in January and stated, .We came down to look at .copper lines .had multiple saddle repair [pipe repair] clamps .pipe over the nurse station had a number of saddle clamp repairs, we made the conclusion that the pipe was reaching its end and deteriorating. The Corporate Director of Plant Operations was asked when he was made aware of problems. He stated, .the Maintenance Director told me about it in February .it [referring to the leaking pipes] wasn't a dire issue in February . The Corporate Director of Plant Operations was asked who monitors the work provided by the contracted Housekeeping Services. The Corporate Director of Plant Operations stated, .What I understand was that the Administrator will walk around and grade them and make adjustments from there. The Corporate Director of Plant Operations was asked how Corporate ensures the Administrator is doing that. The Corporate Director of Plant Operations stated, I don't have an answer for that. The Corporate Director of Plant Operations stated, I've been there twice. The Corporate Director of Plant Operations was asked if he noticed problems with housekeeping on those visits. The Corporate Director of Plant Operations stated, .didn't notice .
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on policy review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, and served under sanitary conditions as evidenced by a dirty bowl stacked in clean bowls, ch...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on policy review, observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, and served under sanitary conditions as evidenced by a dirty bowl stacked in clean bowls, chipped plates, a dirty ice machine, a mound of ice in the walk-in freezer, a dirty freezer floor, staff allowing dirty dishes to come in contact with clean dishes, wet nesting of dishes [stacking of wet items, such as pans and dishes], staff touched clean dishes with dirty gloves, and staff stored personal food in a resident nutrition refrigerator. The facility had a census of 93 with 91 of those residents receiving a meal tray from the kitchen. The findings include: 1. The facility's Sanitization policy revised 2017, documented, .The food service area shall be maintained in a clean sanitary manner .Utensils, counters, shelves and equipment shall be kept clean, maintained in good repair and shall be free from breaks, corrosions, open seams, cracks and chipped areas that may affect their use or proper cleaning .Plastic-ware, china and glassware that cannot be sanitized or are hazardous because of chips, cracks or loss of glaze shall be discarded . The facility's undated AM Shift Cleaning Schedule documented, .Check dishes for wet nesting .Ice Machines .sanitize interior . The facility's Refrigerators and Freezers policy dated 2017 documented, .This facility will ensure safe refrigerator and freezer maintenance, temperatures, and sanitation .Refrigerators and freezers will be kept clean, free of debris, and mopped with sanitizing solution on a scheduled basis and more often as necessary . The facility's Dishwashing Machine Use policy revised 2017 documented, .Wash hands before and after running dishwashing machine .when leaving the dirty end of the machine going to the clean end of the machine .frequently during the process .After running items through entire cycle, allow to air-dry . The facility's Handwashing/Hand Hygiene policy revised April 2010, documented, .This facility considers hand hygiene the primary means to prevent the spread of infections .Employees must wash their hands .s. after handling soiled equipment or utensils .u. After removing gloves or aprons . 2. Observations in the kitchen on 6/24/19 at 8:45 AM, revealed the following: a. A bowl containing black specks and a dead insect and 5 saucers with black specks stored with the clean dishes b. 2 broken, chipped dinner plates stored with other dinner plates Interview with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) on 6/24/19 at 8:48 AM, in the kitchen, revealed the CDM was asked if dishes with black specks and a dead insect on them should be stored with the clean dishes. The CDM stated, No, Ma'am. Interview with the CDM on 6/26/19 at 8:59 AM in the kitchen, revealed the CDM was asked if broken, chipped plates should be stored with clean plates. She stated, No . 3. Observations in the kitchen on 6/24/19 at 8:50 AM and 1:28 PM, on 6/25/19 at 11:59 AM, and on 6/26/19 at 8:00 AM, revealed the following: a. The ice machine had a pink slimy substance across the bottom of the white plastic overhang dripping into the ice. b. There was a mound of ice in the walk-in freezer and freezer floor had an orange and blue frozen substance. Interview with the CDM on 6/26/19 at 8:02 AM, in the kitchen, revealed the CDM used a towel to confirm the pink slimy substance in the ice machine. The CDM was asked if the pink slimy substance should be present. The CDM stated, No. The CDM was asked if ice should be piled in the freezer floor. The CDM stated, No, Ma'am. The CDM was asked if the freezer floor should be kept clean at all times. She stated, Yes. 4. Observations in the kitchen on 6/24/19 at 10:00 AM, revealed Dishwasher Staff #1 used a rack of dirty dishes to push a rack of clean dishes out of the dishwasher. Dishwasher Staff #1 repeated this action 3 times and did not wash her hands. Interview with the CDM on 6/26/19 8:05 AM, in the kitchen, revealed the CDM was asked if a rack of dirty dishes should be used to push a rack of clean dishes out of the dishwasher. The CDM stated, No, Ma'am. 5. Observations in the kitchen on 6/24/19 at 1:28 PM, revealed the following: a. There were 14 wet plate covers stacked together on a counter in the kitchen. b. There were 5 wet plate covers stacked together on the clean counter in the dishwashing area. Observations in the kitchen on 6/25/19 at 12:01 PM, revealed 17 small bowls stacked together wet on the clean dish cart Interview with the CDM on 6/25/19 at 12:03 PM, in the kitchen, revealed the CDM confirmed the 17 bowls should not be stacked together wet. 6. Observations in the kitchen on 6/26/19 at 9:09 AM, revealed Dishwasher Staff #1 was wearing gloves in the dishwashing area and handled her personal cell phone. Dishwasher Staff #1 stated, I spilled milk on my phone. Dishwasher Staff #1 had milk on her uniform and gloves. Dishwasher Staff #1 wiped her hands on her uniform and began to handle the clean dishes with the same gloves used to clean the personal cell phone. Interview with the CDM on 6/27/19 at 8:07 AM in the hall outside the kitchen, revealed the CDM was asked if dishwasher staff should touch a personal cell phone, wipe her hands on her uniform while wearing the gloves, and then touch the clean dishes. The CDM stated, No . 7. Observations in the Secure Unit Nutrition Room on 6/26/19 at 9:36 AM, revealed an unlabeled jar containing an unknown beige creamy substance in the residents' nutrition refrigerator. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1 entered the Nutrition Room and stated, That's my food. Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 on 6/26/19 at 9:38 AM, in the Secure Unit Nutrition Room, revealed LPN #1 was asked if an employee should store their personal food in the residents' nutrition refrigerator. LPN #1 stated, This is only for resident nutrition. Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 6/27/19 at 11:36 AM in the Conference Room, revealed the DON was asked if staff should store their food in the residents' nutrition refrigerator. The DON stated, No, Ma'am.
Sept 2018 5 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Notification of Changes (Tag F0580)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to notify the physician of blood glucose (bloo...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to notify the physician of blood glucose (blood sugar) results for 1 of 5 (Resident #46) sampled residents. The findings include: 1. The Obtaining a Fingerstick Glucose Level policy with a revision date of October 2010 documented, .The person performing this procedure should .Report results promptly to .the Attending Physician . 2. Medical record review revealed Resident #46 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Parkinson's Disease and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. The Medication Administration Record (MAR) for the month July, August, and September 2018 documented, .Insulin Lispro Solution .Inject as per sliding scale .>[greater than] 349, give 6 units and call physician . The MAR documented the following blood glucose results: a. 390 on 7/26/18 at 4:00 PM b. 496 on 7/28/18 at 4:00 PM c. 356 on 7/30/18 at 4:00 PM d. 350 on 8/28/18 at 7:30 AM e. 350 on 8/29/18 at 11:00 AM f. 352 on 8/30/18 at 7:30 AM and 350 at 4:00 PM g. 508 on 8/31/18 at 7:30 AM h. 370 on 9/1/18 at 4:00 PM and 9:00 PM i. 370 on 9/2 /18 at 4:00 PM k. 509 on 9/3/18 at 7:30 AM and 469 at 11:00 AM Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 9/6/18 at 4:45 PM, in the DON office, the DON was asked if the physician had been notified of the blood glucose results above 349, the DON confirmed the physician had not been notified.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Incontinence Care (Tag F0690)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide care and services to m...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide care and services to maintain an indwelling urinary catheter when nursing staff failed to keep the drainage bag off the floor for 1 of 2 (Resident #93) sampled residents reviewed for indwelling urinary catheters. The findings include: The facility's Indwelling Urinary Catheters . policy with a revision date of 11/17, documented, .Be sure the catheter tubing and drainage bag are kept off the floor . Medical record review revealed Resident #93 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Neuromuscular Dysfunction of Bladder, Hypertension, and Hyperlipidemia. The physician's orders dated 8/7/18 documented, .Indwelling (foley) catheter .16ff [french]/10cc [cubic centimeters] . Observations in Resident #93's room on 9/4/18 at 9:05 AM, 2:23 PM, and 3:13 PM, revealed Resident #93 seated in a wheelchair with the indwelling catheter drainage bag hanging underneath the chair and touching the floor. Observation in the dining room on 9/4/18 at 12:17 PM, revealed Resident #93 seated in a wheelchair with the indwelling catheter drainage bag hanging underneath the chair and touching the floor. Observation in Resident #93's room on 9/5/18 5:01 PM, revealed Resident #93 lying in bed with the indwelling catheter drainage bag hanging on the bedside and touching the floor. Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 on 9/5/18 at 5:03 PM in Resident #93's room, LPN #1 confirmed the urinary catheter drainage bag was touching the floor. LPN #1 was asked if the drainage bag should be touching the floor and LPN #1 stated, No ma'am. Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 9/6/18 at 4:07 PM, in the conference room, the DON was asked if it the indwelling urinary catheter drainage bag should be touching the floor. The DON stated, No ma'am .
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Tube Feeding (Tag F0693)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to follow physician orders relate...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to follow physician orders related to an enteral feeding for 1 of 1 (Resident #52) sampled resident reviewed for enteral feeding. The findings include: The facility's Enteral Nutrition . policy with a revision date of 11/16, documented, .Enteral feeding orders will be written to ensure consistent volume infusion .Fluids to be provided (beyond free fluid in product) will be calculated by the Dietician and referred to the Physician for an order . Medical record review revealed Resident #52 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Adult Failure to Thrive, Gastrostomy Status, Dementia, and Diabetes. The significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 6, which indicated severe cognitive impairment, required staff assistance for all activities of daily living, received tube feedings, and received 51 percent or more calories and 501 cubic centimeters (cc) or more fluid intake from tube feeding. The physician's orders dated 8/13/18 documented, .H2O [Water] flush 60 cc/hr [hour] . Observations in Resident #52's room on 9/4/18 at 9:13 AM, and 9/5/18 at 5:10 PM, revealed Resident #52 lying in bed with Glucerna 1.5 infusing per the percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube via pump at 65 cc/hr with the water flush rate set to 0 cc/hr. Observations in Resident #52's room on 9/4/18 at 5:32 PM, revealed Resident #52 in bed with Glucerna 1.5 infusing per PEG via pump at 65 cc/hr with the water flush rate set to 55 cc/hr. Observations in Resident #52's room on 9/5/18 at 9:12 AM, revealed Resident #52 seated in her wheelchair at the bedside with Glucerna 1.5 infusing per PEG via pump at 65 cc/hr with water flush rate set to 0 cc/hr. Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1, on 9/5/18 at 5:15 PM in Resident #52's room, LPN #1 was asked if the water flush rate was correct. LPN #1 confirmed the water flush rate should be set to 60 cc/hr. Interview with the Registered Dietician (RD), on 9/6/18 at 12:58 PM in the conference room, the RD was asked what Resident #52's water flush rate should be. The RD stated, .I recommended her flush at 60 cc/hr. The RD was asked if she expected the nursing staff to follow her recommendations for water flushes. The RD stated, Yes ma'am. Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 9/6/18 at 4:07 PM in the conference room, the DON was asked if it was acceptable for the nursing staff not to follow the physician's orders for the water flush rate. The DON stated, No ma'am.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 4 (Licensed Practi...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 4 (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2) nurses properly disposed of a topical medication patch during medication administration, and failed to ensure medications were not stored past their expiration dates in 1 of 6 (100 Medication Room) medication storage areas. The findings include: 1. The facility's Discarding and Destroying Medications . policy with a revision date of 6/12, documented, .Ointments, creams, and other like substances may be discarded into the trash receptacle in the medication room .Expired medications will be disposed of per state or contracted pharmacy guidelines . 2. Medical record review revealed Resident #199 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Dementia, Pneumonia, Seizures, and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. The physician's order dated 8/31/18 documented, .Rivastigmine Patch 24 Hour [medication patch used to treat dementia] 9.5 MG [milligrams]/24HR [hours] Apply 1 patch transdermally [to the skin] one time a day for dementia . Observations in Resident #199's room on 9/5/18 at 11:39 AM, revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #2 removed the old Rivastigmine patch from Resident #199's left upper arm, and disposed of it inside her gloves in the trash receptacle in Resident #199's room. Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 9/6/18 at 4:07 PM in the conference room, the DON was asked how nurses should dispose of used transdermal patches. The DON stated, Normally they put them in a sharps box . The DON was asked if nurses should dispose of used medication patches in the regular trash in a resident's room. The DON stated, No ma'am. 3. Observations in the 100 Medication Room on 9/5/18 at 12:10 PM, revealed the locked narcotic emergency box had an expiration date of 7/31/18. LPN #3 opened the emergency narcotics box, and revealed 2 zolpidem 5 mg tablets [sedation/hypnotic medication] with an expiration date of 7/31/18, and 1 lorazepam 0.5 mg tablet [anxiety medication] with an expiration date of 8/31/18. Interview with LPN #3 on 9/5/18 at 12:12 PM, in the 100 Medication Room, LPN #3 confirmed the emergency narcotics box contained 2 expired zolpidem tablets and 1 expired lorazepam tablet. Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 9/6/18 at 4:07 PM in the conference room, the DON was asked if it was acceptable to have expired medications in the medication rooms. The DON stated, No ma'am.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observations and interview, the facility failed to ensure personal care items were stored in a sanitary manner in 2 of 42 (shared bathroom of Resident #12, 15, and 87, and shared bathroom of ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations and interview, the facility failed to ensure personal care items were stored in a sanitary manner in 2 of 42 (shared bathroom of Resident #12, 15, and 87, and shared bathroom of Resident # 51 and 60) bathrooms. The findings include: The facility was unable to provide a policy for storage of personal care items. Observations made in the shared bathroom of Residents #12, 15, and 87 on 9/4/18 at 9:12 AM, revealed an uncovered, unlabeled bath basin on top of the toilet, an unlabeled bottle of shampoo/body wash on the sink, an unlabeled tube of toothpaste and an unlabeled toothbrush on top of the soap dispenser. Observations made in the shared bathroom of Residents #12, 15, and 87 on 9/4/18 at 3:01 PM, revealed an unlabeled bath basin in an unlabeled plastic bag with the unlabeled shampoo/body wash inside on the top of the toilet, an unlabeled tube of tooth paste and an unlabeled toothbrush remained on top of the soap dispenser. Observations made in the shared bathroom of Residents #12, 15, and 87 on 9/5/18 at 9:08 AM, and on 9/6/18 at 7:57 AM, revealed the unlabeled bath basin in an unlabeled plastic bag, with the unlabeled shampoo/body wash inside, sitting on the top of the toilet. Interview with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1 on 9/4/18 at 4:18 PM in the shared bathroom of Residents #12, 15, and 87, CNA #1 was unable to confirm which resident the personal care items belonged to. CNA #1 stated, .none of them [residents sharing the bathroom] do their own ADLs [Activities of Daily Living] . Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 on 9/6/18 at 7:57 AM in the shared bathroom of Residents #12, 15, and 87, LPN #1 confirmed that personal care items should be placed in a labeled plastic bag and stored in the resident's bedside table when not in use. LPN #1 confirmed the bath basin and body wash were not stored correctly. LPN #1 stated, .It's an infection control issue . 2. Observations made in the bathroom of Residents #51 and 60 on 9/4/18 at 9:15 AM, and 3:03 PM, revealed 2 unlabeled bottles of shampoo/body wash on the sink, an unlabeled urine stained collection device on the back of the toilet, and 2 unlabeled graduated cylinders the floor behind the toilet. Interview with CNA #1 on 9/4/18 at 4:20 PM, in Resident #51 and 60's bathroom, CNA #1 was unable to confirm to which resident the urine collection device or the graduated cylinders belonged. CNA #1 stated, .Those are used to catch urine if they have a lab test .the nurse would put them in the room then throw them away after they get the urine .I'm not sure why they are still there .
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
  • "What safeguards are in place to prevent abuse and neglect?"
  • "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: Federal abuse finding, 9 life-threatening violation(s), $216,298 in fines, Payment denial on record. Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 30 deficiencies on record, including 9 critical (life-threatening) violations. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
  • • $216,298 in fines. Extremely high, among the most fined facilities in Tennessee. Major compliance failures.
  • • Grade F (0/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: This facility has a substantiated abuse finding. Extreme caution advised. Explore alternatives.

About This Facility

What is Gallaway Health And Rehab's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns GALLAWAY HEALTH AND REHAB an overall rating of 1 out of 5 stars, which is considered much below average nationally. Within Tennessee, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.

How is Gallaway Health And Rehab Staffed?

CMS rates GALLAWAY HEALTH AND REHAB's staffing level at 2 out of 5 stars, which is below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 58%, which is 12 percentage points above the Tennessee average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs.

What Have Inspectors Found at Gallaway Health And Rehab?

State health inspectors documented 30 deficiencies at GALLAWAY HEALTH AND REHAB during 2018 to 2025. These included: 9 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death) and 21 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.

Who Owns and Operates Gallaway Health And Rehab?

GALLAWAY HEALTH AND REHAB is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by MISSION HEALTH COMMUNITIES, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 104 certified beds and approximately 90 residents (about 87% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in GALLAWAY, Tennessee.

How Does Gallaway Health And Rehab Compare to Other Tennessee Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Tennessee, GALLAWAY HEALTH AND REHAB's overall rating (1 stars) is below the state average of 2.8, staff turnover (58%) is significantly higher than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (1 stars) is much below the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Gallaway Health And Rehab?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "What safeguards and monitoring systems are in place to protect residents from abuse or neglect?" "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations, the substantiated abuse finding on record, the facility's high staff turnover rate, and the below-average staffing rating.

Is Gallaway Health And Rehab Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, GALLAWAY HEALTH AND REHAB has documented safety concerns. The facility has 1 substantiated abuse finding (meaning confirmed case of resident harm by staff or other residents). Inspectors have issued 9 Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 1-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Tennessee. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.

Do Nurses at Gallaway Health And Rehab Stick Around?

Staff turnover at GALLAWAY HEALTH AND REHAB is high. At 58%, the facility is 12 percentage points above the Tennessee average of 46%. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?

Was Gallaway Health And Rehab Ever Fined?

GALLAWAY HEALTH AND REHAB has been fined $216,298 across 1 penalty action. This is 6.1x the Tennessee average of $35,242. Fines at this level are uncommon and typically indicate a pattern of serious deficiencies, repeated violations, or failure to correct problems promptly. CMS reserves penalties of this magnitude for facilities that pose significant, documented risk to resident health or safety. Families should request specific documentation of what issues led to these fines and what systemic changes have been implemented.

Is Gallaway Health And Rehab on Any Federal Watch List?

GALLAWAY HEALTH AND REHAB is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.