SIGNATURE HEALTHCARE OF MONTEAGLE REHAB & WELLNESS
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Signature Healthcare of Monteagle Rehab & Wellness has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns about the quality of care provided. Ranking #208 out of 298 facilities in Tennessee places this nursing home in the bottom half, and it is the only option available in Grundy County. The facility has been worsening, with the number of issues increasing from 1 in 2023 to 8 in 2024. Staffing is a major concern, with a poor rating of 1 out of 5 stars and a troubling turnover rate of 68%, far exceeding the state average of 48%. Additionally, the home has faced $39,507 in fines, which is higher than 82% of Tennessee facilities, highlighting compliance issues. There have been serious incidents of resident-to-resident abuse, where one resident was struck with a water pitcher, causing injury, and another was harmed when a resident twisted her wrist. The facility also failed to accurately post daily staffing information, which can impact transparency and trust in the care provided. While there are strengths in quality measures, overall, families should be cautious when considering this facility given the troubling trends and serious allegations.
- Trust Score
- F
- In Tennessee
- #208/298
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Worse
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 68% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
- Penalties ○ Average
- $39,507 in fines. Higher than 59% of Tennessee facilities. Some compliance issues.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 12 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Tennessee. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 14 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
Below Tennessee average (2.8)
Below average - review inspection findings carefully
22pts above Tennessee avg (46%)
Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity
Above median ($33,413)
Moderate penalties - review what triggered them
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
20 points above Tennessee average of 48%
The Ugly 14 deficiencies on record
Jul 2024
8 deficiencies
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Free from Abuse/Neglect
(Tag F0600)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, medical record review, facility investigation review, and interviews, the facility failed to pr...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0558
(Tag F0558)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on medical record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the call light was within reach and ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0584)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Review of the medical record revealed Resident #74 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Dementia, Cog...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-cen...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on medical record review, observation, and interviews, the facility failed to follow a physician's order for 1 resident (R...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to post signage at the...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Staffing Information
(Tag F0732)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on facility policy review, observation and interviews, the facility failed to post accurate daily staffing information for 7 days of 1 of 1 days observed for staff posting.
The findings include:...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on facility policy review, observations, and interviews the facility failed to maintain kitchen equipment in a sanitary condition and failed to discard expired food which had the potential to af...
Read full inspector narrative →
Aug 2023
1 deficiency
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Free from Abuse/Neglect
(Tag F0600)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on review of facility policy, medical record review, review of a facility investigation, observation, and interview the fa...
Read full inspector narrative →
Aug 2021
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0658
(Tag F0658)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0727
(Tag F0727)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on review of the facility's nursing staff schedules, time clock punches, and interviews, the facility failed to provide the services of a Registered Nurse (RN) for the minimum requirement of 8 h...
Read full inspector narrative →
May 2019
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, medical record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide evaluation and rationale f...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Menu Adequacy
(Tag F0803)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to follow the physician'...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to follow infection cont...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "What safeguards are in place to prevent abuse and neglect?"
- "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: Federal abuse finding, 2 harm violation(s), $39,507 in fines. Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 14 deficiencies on record, including 2 serious (caused harm) violations. Ask about corrective actions taken.
- • $39,507 in fines. Higher than 94% of Tennessee facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
- • Grade F (20/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Signature Healthcare Of Monteagle Rehab & Wellness's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns SIGNATURE HEALTHCARE OF MONTEAGLE REHAB & WELLNESS an overall rating of 2 out of 5 stars, which is considered below average nationally. Within Tennessee, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.
How is Signature Healthcare Of Monteagle Rehab & Wellness Staffed?
CMS rates SIGNATURE HEALTHCARE OF MONTEAGLE REHAB & WELLNESS's staffing level at 1 out of 5 stars, which is much below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 68%, which is 22 percentage points above the Tennessee average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs. RN turnover specifically is 56%, which is notably high. RNs provide skilled clinical oversight, so turnover in this role can affect medical care quality.
What Have Inspectors Found at Signature Healthcare Of Monteagle Rehab & Wellness?
State health inspectors documented 14 deficiencies at SIGNATURE HEALTHCARE OF MONTEAGLE REHAB & WELLNESS during 2019 to 2024. These included: 2 that caused actual resident harm and 12 with potential for harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.
Who Owns and Operates Signature Healthcare Of Monteagle Rehab & Wellness?
SIGNATURE HEALTHCARE OF MONTEAGLE REHAB & WELLNESS is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by SIGNATURE HEALTHCARE, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 150 certified beds and approximately 64 residents (about 43% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in MONTEAGLE, Tennessee.
How Does Signature Healthcare Of Monteagle Rehab & Wellness Compare to Other Tennessee Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Tennessee, SIGNATURE HEALTHCARE OF MONTEAGLE REHAB & WELLNESS's overall rating (2 stars) is below the state average of 2.8, staff turnover (68%) is significantly higher than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (2 stars) is below the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Signature Healthcare Of Monteagle Rehab & Wellness?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What safeguards and monitoring systems are in place to protect residents from abuse or neglect?" "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" These questions are particularly relevant given the substantiated abuse finding on record, the facility's high staff turnover rate, and the below-average staffing rating.
Is Signature Healthcare Of Monteagle Rehab & Wellness Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, SIGNATURE HEALTHCARE OF MONTEAGLE REHAB & WELLNESS has documented safety concerns. The facility has 1 substantiated abuse finding (meaning confirmed case of resident harm by staff or other residents). The facility has a 2-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Tennessee. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.
Do Nurses at Signature Healthcare Of Monteagle Rehab & Wellness Stick Around?
Staff turnover at SIGNATURE HEALTHCARE OF MONTEAGLE REHAB & WELLNESS is high. At 68%, the facility is 22 percentage points above the Tennessee average of 46%. Registered Nurse turnover is particularly concerning at 56%. RNs handle complex medical decisions and coordinate care — frequent RN changes can directly impact care quality. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?
Was Signature Healthcare Of Monteagle Rehab & Wellness Ever Fined?
SIGNATURE HEALTHCARE OF MONTEAGLE REHAB & WELLNESS has been fined $39,507 across 2 penalty actions. The Tennessee average is $33,474. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Signature Healthcare Of Monteagle Rehab & Wellness on Any Federal Watch List?
SIGNATURE HEALTHCARE OF MONTEAGLE REHAB & WELLNESS is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.