SIGNATURE HEALTHCARE OF SOUTH PITTSBURG REHAB & WE
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Signature Healthcare of South Pittsburg Rehab & Wellness has a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns and a poor overall reputation. Ranking #211 out of 298 facilities in Tennessee places it in the bottom half, while being #1 in Marion County suggests it is the only option in the area, which may limit choices for families. Unfortunately, the facility is worsening, with issues increasing from 4 in 2023 to 5 in 2024. Staffing is a relative strength with a 3/5 rating and a low turnover rate of 18%, indicating that staff are more stable than average, which is positive. However, there are serious concerns, including incidents where residents were physically abused by each other, leading to injuries, and concerning fines of $20,050, which are higher than 77% of similar facilities. Additionally, while the facility has good RN coverage, the overall performance remains below average, emphasizing the need for potential improvements in both safety and care quality.
- Trust Score
- F
- In Tennessee
- #211/298
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Worse
- Staff Stability ✓ Good
- 18% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 30 points below Tennessee's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
- Penalties ○ Average
- $20,050 in fines. Higher than 50% of Tennessee facilities. Some compliance issues.
- Skilled Nurses ○ Average
- Each resident gets 41 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for Tennessee. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 15 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Low Staff Turnover (18%) · Staff stability means consistent care
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover is low (18%)
30 points below Tennessee average of 48%
Facility shows strength in quality measures, staff retention, fire safety.
The Bad
Below Tennessee average (2.8)
Below average - review inspection findings carefully
Below median ($33,413)
Minor penalties assessed
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 15 deficiencies on record
Oct 2024
5 deficiencies
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Free from Abuse/Neglect
(Tag F0600)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, medical record review, facility investigation review, observation and interview, the facility f...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0584)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to provide a homelike ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual 3.0 review, medical record review, and interviews t...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observation, and interviews the facility failed to follow infection cont...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0602
(Tag F0602)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, medical record review, facility documentation review, resident financial statements review, and...
Read full inspector narrative →
Sept 2023
3 deficiencies
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Free from Abuse/Neglect
(Tag F0600)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on review of a facility policy, medical record review, review of a facility investigation, and interview the facility fail...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on review of a facility policy, facility investigations, medical record review, observation and interview, the facility fa...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0635
(Tag F0635)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observation and interview, the facility failed to obtain an admission Ph...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jan 2023
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0584)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain a safe, comfortable, and homelike environment for 1 reside...
Read full inspector narrative →
Dec 2021
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to maintain a falls inte...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0694
(Tag F0694)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide an appropriate set-up for intravenous...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on facility policy review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to separate resident and staff food items in 3 of 3 resident pantry rooms, failed to discard expired food in 3 of 3 res...
Read full inspector narrative →
Mar 2019
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, medical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to revise a comprehensiv...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0688
(Tag F0688)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on medical record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to ensure resident (#19) had a right hand wrist o...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0840
(Tag F0840)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on facility policy review, observation, and interview the facility failed to provide timely dental services for 1 resident...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "What safeguards are in place to prevent abuse and neglect?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • 18% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 30 points below Tennessee's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: Federal abuse finding, 2 harm violation(s). Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 15 deficiencies on record, including 2 serious (caused harm) violations. Ask about corrective actions taken.
- • $20,050 in fines. Higher than 94% of Tennessee facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
- • Grade F (33/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Signature Healthcare Of South Pittsburg Rehab & We's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns SIGNATURE HEALTHCARE OF SOUTH PITTSBURG REHAB & WE an overall rating of 2 out of 5 stars, which is considered below average nationally. Within Tennessee, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.
How is Signature Healthcare Of South Pittsburg Rehab & We Staffed?
CMS rates SIGNATURE HEALTHCARE OF SOUTH PITTSBURG REHAB & WE's staffing level at 3 out of 5 stars, which is average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 18%, compared to the Tennessee average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Signature Healthcare Of South Pittsburg Rehab & We?
State health inspectors documented 15 deficiencies at SIGNATURE HEALTHCARE OF SOUTH PITTSBURG REHAB & WE during 2019 to 2024. These included: 2 that caused actual resident harm and 13 with potential for harm. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.
Who Owns and Operates Signature Healthcare Of South Pittsburg Rehab & We?
SIGNATURE HEALTHCARE OF SOUTH PITTSBURG REHAB & WE is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by SIGNATURE HEALTHCARE, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 165 certified beds and approximately 73 residents (about 44% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in SOUTH PITTSBURG, Tennessee.
How Does Signature Healthcare Of South Pittsburg Rehab & We Compare to Other Tennessee Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Tennessee, SIGNATURE HEALTHCARE OF SOUTH PITTSBURG REHAB & WE's overall rating (2 stars) is below the state average of 2.8, staff turnover (18%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (2 stars) is below the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Signature Healthcare Of South Pittsburg Rehab & We?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What safeguards and monitoring systems are in place to protect residents from abuse or neglect?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the substantiated abuse finding on record.
Is Signature Healthcare Of South Pittsburg Rehab & We Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, SIGNATURE HEALTHCARE OF SOUTH PITTSBURG REHAB & WE has documented safety concerns. The facility has 1 substantiated abuse finding (meaning confirmed case of resident harm by staff or other residents). The facility has a 2-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Tennessee. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.
Do Nurses at Signature Healthcare Of South Pittsburg Rehab & We Stick Around?
Staff at SIGNATURE HEALTHCARE OF SOUTH PITTSBURG REHAB & WE tend to stick around. With a turnover rate of 18%, the facility is 27 percentage points below the Tennessee average of 46%. Low turnover is a positive sign. It means caregivers have time to learn each resident's needs, medications, and personal preferences. Consistent staff also notice subtle changes in a resident's condition more quickly.
Was Signature Healthcare Of South Pittsburg Rehab & We Ever Fined?
SIGNATURE HEALTHCARE OF SOUTH PITTSBURG REHAB & WE has been fined $20,050 across 2 penalty actions. This is below the Tennessee average of $33,279. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Signature Healthcare Of South Pittsburg Rehab & We on Any Federal Watch List?
SIGNATURE HEALTHCARE OF SOUTH PITTSBURG REHAB & WE is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.