WINDCREST HEALTH & REHABILITATION

6050 HOSPITAL DR, ABILENE, TX 79606 (325) 692-1533
Government - Hospital district 120 Beds ADVANCED HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS Data: November 2025
Trust Grade
75/100
#171 of 1168 in TX
Last Inspection: March 2025

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Windcrest Health & Rehabilitation has a Trust Grade of B, which means it is a good choice among nursing homes. It ranks #171 out of 1,168 facilities in Texas, placing it in the top half of the state, and #2 out of 12 in Taylor County, indicating only one other local option is better. The facility is on an improving trend, having reduced its issues from 6 in 2024 to 2 in 2025. Staffing is average here with a rating of 3 out of 5 stars and a turnover rate of 41%, which is below the Texas average of 50%. However, the facility has faced some concerning incidents, including a serious medication error for one resident and failures in following care plans, which could impact residents' health. Additionally, they had a food safety issue that could pose a risk of foodborne illness. Overall, while there are strengths in staffing stability and RN coverage, families should be aware of the specific care shortcomings.

Trust Score
B
75/100
In Texas
#171/1168
Top 14%
Safety Record
Moderate
Needs review
Inspections
Getting Better
6 → 2 violations
Staff Stability
○ Average
41% turnover. Near Texas's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
Penalties
⚠ Watch
$26,364 in fines. Higher than 77% of Texas facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
Skilled Nurses
○ Average
Each resident gets 30 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for Texas. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
Violations
○ Average
9 deficiencies on record. Average for a facility this size. Mostly minor or procedural issues.
★★★★★
5.0
Overall Rating
★★★☆☆
3.0
Staff Levels
★★★★★
5.0
Care Quality
★★★★☆
4.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2024: 6 issues
2025: 2 issues

The Good

  • 5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record
  • Staff turnover below average (41%)

    7 points below Texas average of 48%

Facility shows strength in quality measures, fire safety.

The Bad

Staff Turnover: 41%

Near Texas avg (46%)

Typical for the industry

Federal Fines: $26,364

Below median ($33,413)

Moderate penalties - review what triggered them

Chain: ADVANCED HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

The Ugly 9 deficiencies on record

2 actual harm
Mar 2025 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 3 residents (Resident #50 and Resident #48) and 1 of 2 staff (LVN A) reviewed for blood glucose monitoring. The facility failed to ensure that LVN A cleaned the glucometer (capillary-blood sampling devices) after using it for Resident #50 and before using it for Resident #48. This failure could place residents at risk for cross contamination, infections, and a decrease in quality of life. Findings included: Resident #50 Review of Resident #50's electronic Face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of diabetes, pelvis fractures, and heart failure. Review of Resident #50's admission MDS dated [DATE], revealed: BIMS of 10 which indicated moderately impaired cognition. Further review of the MDS Section I Active Diagnoses: Type 2 Diabetes. Review of Resident #50's electronic Comprehensive Care plan initiated on 03/07/25, revealed: Focus: Resident has a diagnosis of diabetes and is at risk for unstable blood sugars. Goal: Will remain free from the signs and symptoms of hyper/hypoglycemia. Interventions: Monitor blood sugar as ordered by physician. Review of Resident #50's electronic physicians orders revealed: Fasting Blood Sugar via glucometer before meals and at bedtime, start date 02/27/2025. Resident #48 Review of Resident #48's electronic Face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of diabetes, influenza, and pneumonia. Review of Resident #48's admission MDS dated [DATE], revealed: BIMS of 12 which indicated moderately impaired cognition. Further review of the MDS Section I Active Diagnoses: Type 2 Diabetes and Pneumonia. Review of Resident #48's electronic Comprehensive Care plan revised on 03/10/25, revealed: Focus: Resident has a diagnosis of diabetes and is at risk for unstable blood sugars. Goal: Will remain free from the signs and symptoms of hyper/hypoglycemia. Interventions: Monitor blood sugar as ordered by physician. Review of Resident #48's electronic physicians orders revealed: Fasting Blood Sugar via glucometer before meals and at bedtime, start date 03/03/2025. During an observation on 03/10/25 at 11:35 AM, blood sugar was being taken by LVN A for Resident #50. LVN A did not wash hands but donned gloves and removed glucometer from the drawer of the medication cart. LVN A did not clean glucometer and entered Resident #50's room. LVN A laid glucometer on Resident #50's bedside table without sanitizing or cleaning the table. LVN A obtain blood sugar reading and returned to medication cart laying glucometer down on the cart without cleaning it. LVN A removed gloves and sanitized her hands. LVN A went to the dining room and brought Resident #48 to her room to perform blood sugar check. LVN A donned gloves and grabbed uncleaned glucometer off the medication cart and entered Residents #48's room. LVN A laid glucometer on Resident #48's bedside table without cleaning the table. LVN A obtained blood sugar reading and returned to medication cart and placed glucometer in the drawer without cleaning it. During an interview on 03/10/25 at 11:55 AM, LVN A stated the glucometer should have been cleaned prior to and after each use. She stated she should not have gone from one resident to another without cleaning in between. LVN A stated she had been trained and she knew the proper procedure. She stated she just was nervous with being watched. LVN A stated this failure could lead to spreading infection. During an interview on 03/12/25 at 10:15 AM, the DON stated glucometers must be cleaned prior to each use and after each use and must be let set to dry. She stated glucometers should have never been used for more than one resident without being cleaned prior to using on the next resident. She stated the nurses were trained on this in their yearly competencies regarding infection control. She stated not cleaning glucometers could lead to cross contamination leading to infection. During an interview on 03/12/25 at 10:50 AM, the Administrator stated it was her expectation for the facility staff to follow all infection control procedures. The Administrator stated nurses performed competencies when hired and yearly and they were trained on infection control and glucometers. She stated ultimately it was the DON's responsibility to ensure nursing staff followed infection control procedures. She stated this could lead to cross contamination resulting in infection. Review of LVN A's personnel file revealed she was current and up to date with all training. Review of the facility document titled, 802 Resident Matrix, printed 03/10/25, revealed no residents in the facility had any bloodborne pathogens. Review of facility policy titled, Glucometer Devices, dated 06/08/2021, revealed in part: Anticipated Outcome: Blood glucose testing and monitoring will be performed according to physicians' orders. The disinfection of capillary-blood sampling devices will be performed in a manner to prevent transmission of bloodborne diseases to residents and employees. Process: 1. The facility will ensure blood glucometers will be cleaned and disinfected after each use and according to manufactures instructions for multi-resident use or single use.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure that all drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled and stored in accordance with professional standards...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure that all drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled and stored in accordance with professional standards for 2 of 3 medication carts (medication cart for Unit #1 and medication cart for Unit #2) reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure Resident #33, and Resident #71's natural tears eye drops were labeled with an open date on the medication cart for Unit #1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #12, and Resident #81's natural tears eye drops were labeled with an open date on the medication cart for Unit #2. These failures could affect residents prescribed medications in the facility and place them at risk for not receiving the correct medications, medication misuse, or receiving expired medications. Findings Included: During an observation on 03/10/25 at 10:00 AM, the medication cart for Unit #1 contained 2 bottles of natural tears eye drops with no open date for Resident #33 and Resident #71. During an observation on 03/10/25 at 10:10 AM, the medication cart for the Unit #2 contained 2 bottles of natural tears eye drops with no open date for Resident #12 and Resident #81. During an interview on 03/10/25 at 3:00 PM, LVN B stated all medications in multiuse vials should have been dated when opened. She stated she thought eye drops where good for 90 days after opening date. She stated it was the nurse's responsibility to date the medication when opened and to check the date prior to administering the medication. She stated not putting the open date could lead to residents receiving expired medications. During an interview on 03/12/25 at 10:15 AM, the DON stated eye drops and all multi use vials should have been dated when opened. She stated this should have been done by the nurse who opened the medication and should be checked each time the medication was administered. She stated not dating the medication could lead to the resident receiving expired medications. She stated the pharmacy did random medication cart checks but ultimately it was the nurse's responsibility to ensure all medications that require dating were dated. During an interview on 03/12/25 at 10:50 AM, the Administrator stated it was her expectation for the facility staff to follow medication storage and labeling procedures. She stated it was the nurse's responsibility to label medications when they were opened. She stated this could lead to residents receiving expired medications. Review of facility policy titled, Over-the counter Medications, dated 09/21/2021, revealed in part: Policy: The facility may maintain a supply of over-the-counter medications supplied by the facility as allowed by state regulations. Procedure . 3. For multi-use eye drops, verify expiration date on the product. The product should be dated when opened and is valid for 28 days .
Feb 2024 6 deficiencies 2 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accor...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #77) reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to follow physician's order for daily weights for Resident #77 for 01/26/2024 and 01/27/2024. These failures could place residents at risk for decreased level of functioning and quality of life. Findings included: Review of Resident #77's electronic face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include: Sepsis, Pneumonia, respiratory failure, and congestive heart failure. Review of Resident #77's admission MDS dated [DATE], revealed: Section C: Cognitive Patterns a BIMS score of 14 indicated no cognitive impairment. Further review revealed: Section K: Weight 200.4 lbs Review of Resident #77's Comprehensive Care Plan initiated 01/22/2024, revealed: Focus: The resident has congestive heart failure. Goal: The resident will be free from complications related to CHF through the review date. Interventions: Monitor/document/report to MD PRN any s/sx of CHF: dependent edema of legs and feet .weight monitoring per physician's orders. Review of Resident #77's electronic physicians' orders revealed: Daily weight every day shift for edema for 7 days. Notify physician of weight of 3lbs or grater in 24 hours with a date of 01/26/2024. Review on 01/26/2024 of Resident #77's electronic record revealed no evidence of a weight obtained. Review on 01/27/2024 of Resident #77's electronic record revealed no evidence of a weight obtained. Review on 01/28/2024 of Resident #77's electronic record revealed weight of 206.4 lbs. Review on 01/29/2024 of Resident #77's electronic record revealed weight of 209.8 lbs. Review on 01/30/2024 of Resident #77's electronic record revealed weight of 210.1 lbs. Review of Resident #77's electronic progress note, dated 01/30/2024 at 9:15 am signed by LVN I, revealed: CHF clinic contacted again to f/u on resident's edema. Spoke with office and informed them of edema to BLE and weight gain. Also requested all notes from previous visits. Office to notify provider and appointment scheduled for 1/31/24 @ 0930. Review of Resident #77's electronic progress note, dated 01/31/2024 at 11:47 am signed by LVN I, revealed: Resident attended appointment with CHF clinic today for f/u d/t BLE edema. Weight gain was noted by provider. 3-4+ edema present to BLE. Labs performed at appointment. Orders given by provider for the following: stop Lasix, start torsemide 20mg PO BID. Family member was present at appointment and aware. Review of Resident #77's CHF Clinic Patient Summary, date 01/31/2024, revealed: The patient is seen today as emergent work-in appointment. Her weight is up 7 lbs. from the last appointment one week ago. She has 3 to 4+ edema to lower legs bilaterally with weeping from the legs. She was seen in trauma center for cellulitis and was started on antibiotics. She is in a wheelchair. The patient feels like Lasix is no longer effective in keeping her swelling controlled. The patient was given 40 milliequivalents of potassium. She was also given 80 milligrams of IV Lasix for her weight gain and heart failure symptoms. During an observation and interview on 01/29/24 at 12:13 PM, revealed Resident #77 sitting in recliner and resident family member sitting on her bed. Resident #77's legs were swollen, red, and not elevated. No signs or symptoms of respiratory acute distress noted. Resident denied pain or any shortness of breath. Resident #77's family member stated Resident #77 had a history of problems with swelling and fluid overload. During an observation and interview on 01/31/24 at 2:00 PM, Resident #77 was up in wheelchair just returning from her visit the CHF clinic. No signs or symptoms of respiratory acute distress noted. Resident denied pain or any shortness of breath. Resident stated she received liquid Lasix for her swelling and that she was going to pee all night. During an interview on 01/31/24 at 03:00 PM, the DON stated stated she was ultimately responsible for monitoring and ensuring that all physicians orders were followed. During interview on 01/31/2024 at 8:00pm, DON and Administrator stated the facility did not have a policy for following physician's orders.
SERIOUS (H) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Deficiency F0760 (Tag F0760)

A resident was harmed · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent significant medication error for 1 of 33 resi...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent significant medication error for 1 of 33 residents (Resident #77) reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to follow physician's order by not administering Lasix 20mg (diuretic medication to reduce swelling) as needed every 24 hours for Resident #77. These failures could place residents at risk for decreased level of functioning and quality of life. Findings included: Review of Resident #77's electronic face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include: Sepsis, Pneumonia, respiratory failure, and congestive heart failure. Review of Resident #77's admission MDS dated [DATE], revealed: Section C: Cognitive Patterns a BIMS score of 14' indicated no cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #77's Comprehensive Care Plan initiated 01/22/2024, revealed: Focus: The resident has congestive heart failure. Goal: The resident will be free from complications related to CHF through the review date. Interventions: Monitor/document/report to MD PRN any s/sx of CHF: dependent edema of legs and feet .weight monitoring per physician's orders. Review of Resident #77's electronic physicians' orders revealed: Start date 01/19/2024, Discontinued 01/31/2024: Furosemide (Lasix) oral tablet 20 MG give 1 tablet every 24 hours as needed for swelling Start date 02/01/2024: 1500mL Fluid Restriction: Med Pass Fluids: Up to 600mL. Total AM: 240mL. Afternoon: 120mL. PM: 240mL. Meal Fluids: Up to 600mL. Total Breakfast: 120mL. Lunch: 240mL. Supper 240mL. Free Fluids: 300mL Start date 01/27/2024: Daily Weights Start date 02/02/2024: Edema Bilateral Legs: Monitor every Shift from increase edema or dressing rolling down. 1. Cleanse bilateral Les with dermal wound cleanser. 2. Apply Webril and Tubigrip D from base of toes to just below knees. 3. Change dressings PRN. Start date 01/31/2024: Torsemide Oral Table 20mg Give tablet by mouth two times a day. Review of Resident #77's Admit Evaluation, dated 01/19/2024 completed by RN D, revealed: 3+ edema (swelling) to bilateral lower extremities with discoloration. Review of Resident #77's electronic progress notes revealed: 01/19/2024 at 4:30pm signed by RN D: 3+ edema to bilateral lower extremities with discoloration. 01/20/2024 at 07:14 pm signed by RN E: +2 to +3 edema to BLE and Fluid restriction 1500 cc. 01/21/2024 at 03:47 am signed by RN F: the resident has mild pitting edema. 01/22/2024 at 04:53 pm signed by RN D: resident noted to have an increase in edema this shift to BLE. The resident has deep pitting, the indentation remains for a short time, looks swollen to. 01/23/2024 at 04:57 pm signed RN D: resident noted to have an increase in edema this shift to BLE; Resident requested to be laid in bed. Legs elevated. The resident has deep pitting, the indentation remains for a short time, looks swollen to. 01/24/2024 at 02:52 am signed by RN G: The resident has deep pitting, the indentation remains for a short time, looks swollen to. +2 to +3 edema to BLE; Fluid restriction 1500 cc. 01/25/2024 at 02:53 am signed by RN F: The resident has moderate pitting edema; indentation subsides rapidly to. Further review of electronic progress notes revealed no evidence of notifying the physician. 01/26/2024 at 03:07 pm signed by LVN H: The resident has moderate pitting edema; indentation subsides rapidly to. Resident continues to have increased edema to BLE. Continues to monitor resident for c/o pain to site, continue to provide PRN Lasix per orders for edema. Continue to encourage resident to elevate extremities. Resident dangles legs a majority of the day, unless resting in bed. Resident is aware of edema and our concerns. Lab results in review of physician at this time. Residents' family expresses concern about edema. Resident has history of diuretic secretion disorder. Nurse Practitioner in facility assessed resident this shift. Awaiting response. 01/26/2024 at 03:55 pm signed by LVN I: Edema present to BLE, 3+. Receives Lasix 20mg QD PRN for edema. Residents' family member expresses concern regarding edema and Lasix and would like to have Lasix scheduled daily. Nurse Practitioner aware of family members concerns and is reviewing. Placed on daily weights at this time x7 days. 01/26/24 at 4:27 PM signed by Nurse Practitioner: Resident #77 is lying in bed, alert, and smiling. She states that she does have some slight pain to her legs. Nursing staff reports edema to bilateral lower legs that causes the patient some discomfort with ROM and with transfers. Pitting Edema 3+ pitting edema noted to bilateral lower extremities. No s/sx of cellulitis noted at this time. Will advise to obtain daily weight X7 days and notify provider of >3 lb. wt. gain noted. Follow up in one week. 01/27/2024 at 01:33 pm signed by RN E: Upon daily assessment, resident's BLE noted at +4 edema to BLE with erythema and purple discoloration from feet to knees with erythema and edema moving up the inner and outer bilateral thighs. BLE warm and sensitive. Resident received new order for Lasix. Resident was to lay down with BLE elevated and Lasix administered. Will re-evaluate in 2-hours to re-assess for worsening erythema, warmth, and/or pain. Family member notified via phone with no questions or concerns at this time. 01/27/2024 at 05:57 pm signed by RN E: Resident's BLE re-assessed, and edema and purple discoloration improved and found to be erythematous, warm, and painful with erythema traveling up the inner and outer bilateral thighs. Physician notified and gave new order to send to ER to evaluate for possible cellulitis to the BLE. Resident is sitting up in bed, alert & oriented to baseline without confusion or distress at this time. Pain to BLE rated 4/10 and tender to touch. Family member notified via phone and requested resident be sent to hospital and will meet her there shortly. 01/28/2024 at 05:38 am signed by RN G: Resident returned from ER with new order for Clindamycin 300 mg TID for cellulitis and was initial dosed. Monitor edema. Daily weight. Monitor for s/sx of adverse reaction noted. Monitor for increased redness. Edema continues. Monitor weight No s/sx of adverse reaction noted. Redness continues. Edema continues to be + 3 Encouraged to elevate legs. Weight 206.4lbs 01/28/2024 at 06:28 pm signed by RN J: Resident came back from hospital this morning with new order of Clindamycin 300mg oral capsule TID due to cellulitis. Resident still has +3 Edema in both extremities. Encourage leg elevation to relieve edema. 01/29/2024 at 12:33 pm signed by LVN K: Resident continues to have increased edema to BLE. Continue to monitor resident for c/o pain to site, continue to provide PRN Lasix per orders for edema. Continue to encourage resident to elevate extremities. Resident dangles legs a majority of the day, unless resting in bed. Resident aware of edema and our concerns. Increasing edema to BLE. 01/29/2024 at 1:23 pm signed by LVN I: CHF clinic contacted regarding resident's edema to BLE. Continues with 3-4+ edema to BLE. Discoloration is present and resident is currently being treated for cellulitis with doxycycline. Resident does have mild discomfort when legs are palpated. Sits up in wheelchair most of day with legs extended with footrests per her choice. Current diuretic orders include Lasix 20mg QD PRN for edema. Significant weight gain is noted since admission r/t fluid. CHF clinic contacted to notify Provider and obtain recommendations. 01/30/2024 at 9:15 am signed by LVN I: CHF clinic contacted again to f/u on resident's edema. Spoke with office and informed them of edema to BLE and weight gain. Also requested all notes from previous visits. Office to notify provider and appointment scheduled for 1/31/24 @ 0930. 01/31/2024 at 11:47 am signed by LVN I: Resident attended appointment with CHF clinic today for f/u d/t BLE edema. Weight gain was noted by provider. 3-4+ edema present to BLE. Labs performed at appointment. Orders given by provider for the following: stop Lasix, start torsemide 20mg PO BID. Family member was present at appointment and aware. Review of Resident #77's electronic MAR revealed: 01/20/2024: order for Furosemide 20mg Give 1 tablet by mouth every 24 hours as needed for edema and no evidence of administration 01/21/2024 at 10:23am Furosemide 20mg was administered 01/22/2024: order for Furosemide 20mg Give 1 tablet by mouth every 24 hours as needed for edema and no evidence of administration 01/23/2024: order for Furosemide 20mg Give 1 tablet by mouth every 24 hours as needed for edema and no evidence of administration 01/24/2024: order for Furosemide 20mg Give 1 tablet by mouth every 24 hours as needed for edema and no evidence of administration 01/25/2024: order for Lasix and no evidence of administration 01/26/2024: order for Furosemide 20mg Give 1 tablet by mouth every 24 hours as needed for edema and no evidence of administration 01/27/2024 at 11:06am: Furosemide 20mg was administered 01/28/2024: order for Furosemide 20mg Give 1 tablet by mouth every 24 hours as needed for edema and no evidence of administration 01/29/2024 at 12:21 pm: Furosemide 20mg was administered 01/30/2024: order for Furosemide 20mg Give 1 tablet by mouth every 24 hours as needed for edema and no evidence of administration Review of ER Discharge note dated 01/28/2024 revealed discharged with antibiotic Clindamycin 300mg three times a day for cellulitis. Review of Resident #77's CHF Clinic Patient Summary, date 01/31/2024, revealed: The patient is seen today as emergent work-in appointment. Her weight is up 7 lbs. from the last appointment one week ago. She has 3 to 4+ edema to lower legs bilaterally with weeping from the legs. She was seen in trauma center for cellulitis and was started on antibiotics. She is in a wheelchair. The patient feels like Lasix is no longer effective in keeping her swelling controlled. The patient was given 40 milliequivalents of potassium. She was also given 80 milligrams of IV Lasix for her weight gain and heart failure symptoms. During an observation and interview on 01/29/24 at 12:13 PM, revealed Resident #77 sitting in recliner and resident family member sitting on her bed. Resident #77's legs were swollen, red, and not elevated. No signs or symptoms of respiratory or acute distress noted. Resident denied pain or any shortness of breath. Resident #77's family member stated Resident #77 had a history of problems with swelling and fluid overload. She stated Resident #77 was sent to the emergency room on [DATE] and was diagnosed with cellulitis (infection of the legs). During an observation and interview on 01/31/24 at 2:00 PM, Resident #77 was up in wheelchair just returning from her visit the CHF clinic No signs or symptoms of respiratory or acute distress noted. Resident denied pain or any shortness of breath. Resident stated she received liquid Lasix for her swelling and that she was going to pee all night. During an interview on 01/31/24 at 03:00 PM, the DON stated all residents with PRN Lasix orders should have also had an order for edema monitoring. She stated Lasix should have been given every day that Resident #77 had edema documented and the physician should have been notified each time. The DON stated not giving the Lasix could have caused the cellulitis and could have prevented the fluid overload and the need for IV Lasix. The DON stated it was a system failure that led to the Lasix not being administered as needed. She stated she was ultimately responsible for monitoring and ensuring that all physicians orders were followed. During an interview on 01/31/24 at 03:30 PM, LVN H stated she was aware that Resident #77 had PRN Lasix orders. She stated she did not give the Lasix because Resident #77 did not tolerate it well. She stated the Nurse Practitioner did not want the Lasix given. LVN H stated she had discussed the edema and Lasix order with the Nurse Practitioner but had not documented the conversation. Attempted interview with RN-D on 01/31/2024 at 1:31 pm via phone call with no answer. Voice mail left with no return call. Attempted interview with RN-D on 02/14/2024 at 11:30 am via phone call with no answer. Voice mail left with no return call. Attempted interview with RN-E on 01/31/2024 at 1:33pm via phone call with no answer. Voice mail left with no return call. Attempted interview with RN-E on 02/14/2024 at 11:32 am via phone call with no answer. Voice mail left with no return call. Attempted interview with RN-F on 01/31/2024 at 1:35pm via phone call with no answer. Voice mail left with no return call. Attempted interview with RN-F on 02/14/2024 at 11:37 am via phone call with no answer. Voice mail left with no return call. Attempted interview with RN-G on 01/31/2024 at 1:45pm via phone call with no answer. Voice mail left with no return call. Attempted interview with RN-G on 02/14/2024 at 11:42 am via phone call with no answer. Voice mail left with no return call. Attempted interview with physician on 01/31/2024 at 3:50 PM via phone call with no answer. Voice mail left with no return call. Attempted interview with physician on 02/14/2024 at 11:12 AM via phone call with no answer. Voice mail left with no return call. During an interview on 01/31/24 at 04:00 PM, Resident #77's Nurse Practitioner stated she had seen Resident #77 on 01/26/24 and she had 3+ edema but no signs of cellulitis at that time. She stated she did not order Lasix to be routinely given because she was monitoring her prior labs. Nurse Practitioner stated she had not told any staff not to give the Lasix as needed per physicians' orders. She stated her expectation was for it to be given daily if needed and to be notified. She stated she had never been contacted or notified of Resident #77's edema other than on 01/26/2024 when she visited the facility. Nurse Practitioner stated not administering Lasix as needed could have led to the cellulitis and the fluid overload. During a follow up interview on 02/14/2024 at 12:10pm, Resident #77's Nurse Practitioner stated was concerned about routine Lasix bottoming out the resident's sodium and potassium levels. She stated that the risk of low sodium and potassium levels outweighed the resident's edema because the resident was not in acute distress nor had shortness of breath. The Nurse Practitioner stated that low sodium and potassium levels can lead to cardiac issues such as cardiac arrhythmias. The Nurse Practitioner also stated that the resident was an established patient with the local CHF clinic and when consulting with the resident's physician, the plan of care was to monitor and allow the CHF clinic to address the edema. She stated the facility was able to get the resident an earlier appointment. She stated again that the resident was never in acute distress nor had shortness of breath; therefore, she did not have a concern about the Furosemide being administered. During interview on 01/31/2024 at 8:00pm, DON and Administrator stated the facility did not have a policy for following physician's orders. Review of Center for Disease Control and Prevention website accessed on 02/15/2024 at https://www.cdc.gov/groupastrep/diseases-public/Cellulitis.html revealed: Cellulitis is a common bacterial skin infection that causes redness, swelling, and pain in the infected area of the skin. Review of the Food and Drug Administration website accessed on 02/15/2024 at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2010/016273s061lbl.pdf revealed: WARNING: Lasix (furosemide) is a potent diuretic which, if given in excessive amounts, can lead to a profound diuresis with water and electrolyte depletion. Therefore, careful medical supervision is required, and dose and dose schedule must be adjusted to the individual patient's needs. Lasix is indicated in adults and pediatric patients for the treatment of edema associated with congestive heart failure. Review of the Food and Drug Administration website accessed on 02/15/2024 at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2010/020136s023lbl.pdf revealed: Demadex (torsemide) is a diuretic.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that the resident environment remained as free of accident ha...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible for one (Resident #20) of three residents reviewed for accident hazards. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #20's fall matt was placed beside her bed as ordered by physician. This failure could put residents at increased risk for accidents and injury. Findings include: Review of Resident #20's Face Sheet revealed an [AGE] year-old female initially admitted on [DATE] with a recent admission date of 12/15/2023. Resident #20's medical diagnoses included psychotic disorder with hallucinations, blood clots in the legs, back pain, difficulty walking, right shoulder pain, weakness, night terrors, and impaired cognition. Review of Resident #20's Annual MDS dated [DATE] revealed in Section C - C0500. BIMS Summary Score a BIMS score of 00 indicating the resident was unable to complete the interview. Review of Resident #20's Comprehensive Care Plan initiated 04/18/2018 and reviewed/revised12/27/2023 revealed the following focused areas: *Falls: Resident has the potential for falls related to cognitive impairment, antihypertensive drug use, Psychoactive drug use, Gait/balance problems, Fall Risk Score >10 and night terrors. An Intervention for the focus on falls included using an Alarm when in bed due to poor safety awareness, *Fall Risk Screening upon admission and quarterly to identify risk factors, An intervention was to Keep bed in lowest position when not providing care, Review of Resident #20's physician orders reviewed on 1/31/2024 revealed: Low bed with mat to prevent injuries. Ensue placement of mat beside the bed and furniture away from bed. Every shift for Resident safety. During an observation on 01/30/2024 at 1:24 PM Resident #20 was lying in her bed sleeping, fall mat was not beside the bed. Resident #20's fall mat was observed propped against the opposite wall in her room. During an interview on 01/31/2024 at 02:45 PM LVN L stated Resident #20 was supposed to have floor mat beside her bed when she was laid in her bed. LVN L stated Resident #20 tried to get out of bed and could have hurt herself if the mat was not next to bed. LVN L stated if she had rolled out of bed, she could have hurt herself, if the mat was not in place. LVN L stated CNA and nurse were responsible to ensure the mat was placed back next to bed. LVN L did not have a reason for the failure, she stated the mattress was in room so it should have been put back beside her bed. During an interview on 01/31/2024 at 3:45 PM the DON stated if residents were ordered to have a fall mat they should have had a fall mat beside the bed any time they were in bed. The DON stated nurses and aides were responsible to ensure the fall mats were in place before leaving the resident's room. The DON stated not having the fall mats in place could have caused residents to be injured. The DON stated the failure of not placing the fall mat beside resident's bed could have been staff gotten busy and forgot to replace the fall mat at the bedside. During exit conference on 01/31/2024 at 8:00 PM the DON and ADMN stated they did not have any other policies to provide.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the comprehensive assessment for 2 (Resident #2 and Resident #20) of 4 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan that addressed bed and chair alarms for Resident #2. The facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan that addressed a chair alarm for Resident #20. These failures could place residents at risk for falls and/or injury, negatively impact the resident's quality of life, as well as the quality of care and services received. Findings included: 1.Review of Resident #2's face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] with medical diagnoses of fracture of the pelvic bone, dementia, type 2 diabetes, heart disease, and osteoporosis. Review of Resident #2's admission MDS dated [DATE] revealed in Section C - C0500. BIMS Summary Score a BIMS score of 9 out of 15 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #2's Comprehensive Care Plan dated 12/06/2023 revealed a focus problem of Falls: Resident has the potential for falls related to recent fall with pubic fx and impaired cognition with poor safety awareness. Interventions for the focus on falls included: Educate the resident/family/caregivers about safety measures and what to do if a fall occurs, Encourage socialization and activity attendance as tolerated, Encourage the resident to participate in activities that promote exercise, physical activity for strengthening and improved mobility., Fall Risk Screening upon admission and quarterly to identify risk factors. and Place the resident's call light is within reach and encourage the resident to use it for assistance as needed. During an observation on 01/30/24 at 09:20 AM, Resident #2 was sitting in a wheelchair in his room. A pressure pad alarm was noted on his bed and a magnetic pull cord chair alarm was attached to the wheelchair and clipped on the resident. Resident #2 stated when he tried to stand the alarm lets the staff know he needs help. 2.Review of Resident #20's Face Sheet revealed an [AGE] year-old female initially admitted on [DATE] with a recent admission date of 12/15/2023. Resident #20's medical diagnoses included kidney disease, psychotic disorder with hallucinations, Type 2 diabetes, blood clots in the legs, back pain, difficulty walking, right shoulder pain, difficulty with swallowing, weakness, night terrors, high cholesterol, heart failure, heartburn, and impaired cognition. Review of Resident #20's Annual MDS dated [DATE] revealed in Section C - C0500. BIMS Summary Score a BIMS score of 00 indicating the resident was unable to complete the interview. Review of Resident #20's Comprehensive Care Plan initiated 04/18/2018 and reviewed/revised12/27/2023 revealed a focus problem of Falls: Resident has the potential for falls related to cognitive impairment, antihypertensive drug use, Psychoactive drug use, Gait/balance problems, Fall Risk Score >10 and night terrors. Interventions for the focus on falls included: Alarm when in bed due to poor safety awareness, Anticipate and meet the resident's needs. Place items frequently used by the resident within easy reach when in the room. Educate the resident/family/caregivers about safety reminders and what to do if a fall occurs, Encourage socialization and activity attendance as tolerated, Encourage the resident to participate in activities that promote exercise, physical activity for strengthening and improved mobility, Ensure that the resident is wearing appropriate footwear when ambulating or mobilizing in wheelchair, Fall Risk Screening upon admission and quarterly to identify risk factors, Keep bed in lowest position when not providing care, Place the resident's call light is within reach and encourage the resident to use it for assistance as needed, Review information on past falls and attempt to determine cause of falls, Record possible root causes. Alter or remove any potential causes if possible. Educate resident/family/caregivers/IDT as to causes, and Therapy for strengthening. During an observation on 01/29/24 at 03:25 PM, Resident #20 was self-propelling her wheelchair in the day room. A magnetic pull cord chair alarm was attached to the wheelchair and clipped on the resident. During an interview on 01/31/24 at 11:37 AM, the DON stated Resident #20 had a bed and chair alarm due to her tendency to lean in her chair and the alarm notified staff that the resident needed to be repositioned. The DON stated she was not sure if the facility had a policy to address justifying the use of an alarm. The DON was unable to recall requirements for placing an alarm. During an interview on 01/31/24 at 01:15 PM, the DON stated resident with alarms should have a provider order, an assessment should be completed, and the care plan updated to include the alarm(s). During an interview on 01/31/24 at 02:45 PM, LVN L stated residents on the unit had chair alarms to notify staff that residents were getting up and give them time to get to the resident to prevent the falling. She stated residents with alarms had a history of multiple falls, were assessed for alarms and orders were written and the care plan would be updated. LVN L stated she did not feel residents were being restrained, that it was more a safety issue. During an interview on 01/31/24 at 03:25 PM, with the DON and ADON, the ADON stated a provider order was not required to place bed or chair alarms. The DON stated her expectations when bed and/or chair alarms were placed, an assessment was done first. Once an assessment indicated a need for a bed and/or chair alarm, the care plan was updated, and a monitoring plan was put in place. The DON was not able to state a reason why the failure occurred. Review of the facility policy titled Comprehensive Care Plans dated 02/10/21 revealed It is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident consistent with resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment.
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen's revi...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen's reviewed for meal service. Facility kitchen staff failed to discard food after handles touched with bare hands fell into pureed bread pan and roll bin during meal service. These failures could place residents at risk of food borne illness that ate from the kitchen. Findings included: During an observation on 01/29/2024 at 12:33 p.m., [NAME] A picked up scoop handle that was lying in puree bread halfway through meal pass and removed . [NAME] A asked [NAME] B to bring clean scoop over to steam table. [NAME] B brought back a clean scoop and placed into puree bread. [NAME] A started serving pureed bread to two of the pureed meal trays. The pureed bread was taken off the steam table by [NAME] A only after being asked if the food was okay to be served. During an interview on 01/29/2024 at 12:37 p.m., [NAME] A denied knowing that handle of scoop had dropped into ready to serve pureed bread, she stated if the handle had touched pureed bread, then all the pureed bread needed to be removed and replaced. She stated the effect not removing pureed bread after contamination would be that residents could get sick. During an observation and interview on 01/29/2024 at 12:42 p.m., [NAME] B dropped end of tongs into bread roll container and began to serve bread again until, [NAME] B was asked if bread was still able to be served. After one roll was served, [NAME] B took container with rolls off food dispensing area and replaced with new tongs and bread sticks. [NAME] B stated I thought it was empty container when asked why she continued to serve pureed bread after contamination. [NAME] B stated that food should not be served after handle dropping into food bin. During an interview on 01/29/2024 at 1:23 p.m., the DM stated her expectation would be to discard all food once handle fell into it. She stated after handle fell into food it would be contaminated. She stated she did not know why [NAME] A and [NAME] B did not replace food when it had been contaminated with handles. She stated she was responsible for monitoring dietary during meals to make sure that cross contamination did not occur. She stated the effect serving food that handle had fallen in could lead to residents becoming sick. During an interview on 01/30/2024 at 12:59 p.m., the ADMN stated her expectation would be that food would not be served after handle dropped into food. She stated it would be different if staff wore gloves. She stated the DM and herself were responsible for supervising meal passed intermittently. She stated the effect of continuing to serve food after handle fell into it could cause residents to get sick. Review of policy titled Food Safety and Sanitation Plan origination date 9/2005 and revision date on 11/2017 revealed Nursing home residents risk serous complication from food borne illness as a result of their compromised health status. Unsafe food handling practices present a potential source of pathogen exposure for residents. Sanitary conditions must be present in health care food service settings to promote safe food handling .Cross contamination means the transfer of harmful substances or disease-causing microorganisms to food by hands, food contact surfaces, sponges, cloth towels, or utensils which are not cleaned after touching raw food and then touching ready-to-eat foods .
MINOR (C) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact

Staffing Information (Tag F0732)

Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents

Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure staffing information was posted in a prominent place readily accessible to residents and visitors that included: The total number ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure staffing information was posted in a prominent place readily accessible to residents and visitors that included: The total number and the actual hours worked by the registered nurses, licensed practical nurses or licensed vocational nurses and certified nurse aides directly responsible for resident care per shift for 1 of 3 days reviewed. The facility failed to ensure the daily staffing information was posted in a prominent location on 01/30/2024. This failure could place residents, their families, and visitors at risk of not knowing how many staff are currently working to provide care on all shifts. Findings Included: During an observation on 01/30/2024 at 9:12 a.m., daily staffing posted in hallways for previous date of 01/29/2024. During an observation on 01/30/2024 at 3:31 p.m., daily staffing posted in hallways for previous date of 01/29/2024. During an interview on 01/31/2024 at 11:36 a.m., the ADMN stated LVN C was responsible for making sure daily staffing was posted. During an interview on 01/31/2024 at 1:41 p.m., LVN C stated she was responsible for posting staffing daily. She voiced that on 01/30/2024 she had to work on Unit 3 performing direct care and had forgotten to post staffing that day. LVN C stated the effect of not posting daily would be that the resident and family members would not be notified of staffing numbers for that day. She stated that they may not be comforted that their loved ones were taken care of without those numbers. During an interview on 01/31/2024 at 2:26 p.m., the ADMN stated that DON was responsible for monitoring that daily staffing was posted. During an interview on 01/31/2024 at 2:38 p.m., the DON stated it was her responsibility to monitor that daily staffing was posted daily. She stated that LVN C having to fill in on Unit 3 was why it was not posted on 01/30/2024. The DON stated no negative outcome would come of daily staffing not being posted because their residents' and families of the residents new the facility and loved them. Review of policy titled nurse staffing posting guidelines dated 11/04/2017 revealed: It is the policy of this facility to make staffing information readily available in a readable format to residents and visitors at any given time . The nurse staffing information will be posted on a daily basis and will contain the following information: Facility name, The current date, Facility's current resident census, The total number and the actual hours worked by the following categories of licensed and unlicensed staff directly responsible for resident care per shift .registered nurses .licensed vocational nurses .certified nurse aides .the facility will post the nurse staffing data at the beginning of each shift.
Nov 2022 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and con...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections reviewed for 1 of 4 staff (CNA A) reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure staff (CNA A) wore face coverings correctly while providing direct care services. This failure could place the residents at risk of infection. Findings included: During observation on 11/28/22 between 11:00 AM and 11:30 AM on Unit 3, CNA A was observed walking around unit with her nose and mouth uncovered with a surgical mask under her chin. CNA A was observed pushing residents in wheelchairs, standing shoulder to shoulder with residents assisting them walking, bending over talking with residents, and delivering resident's drinks and snacks. During observation on 11/28/22 between 3:00 PM and 3:30 PM on Unit 3, CNA A was observed walking around unit with her nose and mouth uncovered with a mask under her chin. CNA A was observed pushing residents in wheelchairs, standing shoulder to shoulder with residents assisting them walking, patted resident on back, bending over talking with residents, and delivering resident's drinks. During an interview on 11/28/2022 at 3:30 PM, CNA A stated she should have been wearing her mask covering her mouth and nose. CNA A stated she was congested and was not able to breathe. CNA A stated that it was important to wear mask appropriately to prevent spread of COVID, and not wearing mask covering mouth and nose could have caused residents to get sick. CNA A stated she had screened herself before entering the building. During an interview on 11/30/22 at 2:50PM, the DON stated her expectation was that staff follow the rules and mask should be worn covering both their nose and mouth. The DON stated the Community Transmission levels were high, which indicated all staff and visitors needed to wear a mask while in the building. The DON stated the reason for the failure of CNA A not properly wearing a mask was due to the employee having such difficulty in breathing with allergies and congestion, she really was not paying attention to the fact that her mask was not covering her nose and mouth while around the residents. The DON stated the potential for harm for the residents could have been that if she would have had Covid and not allergies, then she could have spread the Covid virus to the residents. Record review of CNA A's employee file revealed that CNA A completed Infection Control training on 11/11/2022. Record review of the facility policy titled Coronavirus Surveillance dated 10/24/2022 revealed, Facemask [NAME] be used by everyone (including staff and visitors), if community Transmission levels are high, when they are in areas of the healthcare facility where they could encounter residents. Review of the CDC website https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker accessed on 11/30/2022 revealed the Community Transmission level for [NAME] County was high. Review of the CDC website https://cdc.gov/coronavirus accessed on 11/30/2022 revealed, When putting on a facemask, clean your hands put on our facemask so it fully covers your mouth and nose.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • 41% turnover. Below Texas's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
Concerns
  • • 9 deficiencies on record, including 2 serious (caused harm) violations. Ask about corrective actions taken.
  • • $26,364 in fines. Higher than 94% of Texas facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
Bottom line: Generally positive indicators. Standard due diligence and a personal visit recommended.

About This Facility

What is Windcrest Health & Rehabilitation's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns WINDCREST HEALTH & REHABILITATION an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Texas, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.

How is Windcrest Health & Rehabilitation Staffed?

CMS rates WINDCREST HEALTH & REHABILITATION's staffing level at 3 out of 5 stars, which is average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 41%, compared to the Texas average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.

What Have Inspectors Found at Windcrest Health & Rehabilitation?

State health inspectors documented 9 deficiencies at WINDCREST HEALTH & REHABILITATION during 2022 to 2025. These included: 2 that caused actual resident harm, 6 with potential for harm, and 1 minor or isolated issues. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.

Who Owns and Operates Windcrest Health & Rehabilitation?

WINDCREST HEALTH & REHABILITATION is owned by a government entity. Government-operated facilities are typically run by state, county, or municipal agencies. The facility is operated by ADVANCED HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 120 certified beds and approximately 106 residents (about 88% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in ABILENE, Texas.

How Does Windcrest Health & Rehabilitation Compare to Other Texas Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Texas, WINDCREST HEALTH & REHABILITATION's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 2.8, staff turnover (41%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Windcrest Health & Rehabilitation?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"

Is Windcrest Health & Rehabilitation Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, WINDCREST HEALTH & REHABILITATION has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Texas. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.

Do Nurses at Windcrest Health & Rehabilitation Stick Around?

WINDCREST HEALTH & REHABILITATION has a staff turnover rate of 41%, which is about average for Texas nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.

Was Windcrest Health & Rehabilitation Ever Fined?

WINDCREST HEALTH & REHABILITATION has been fined $26,364 across 1 penalty action. This is below the Texas average of $33,343. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.

Is Windcrest Health & Rehabilitation on Any Federal Watch List?

WINDCREST HEALTH & REHABILITATION is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.