JUNIPER VILLAGE AT SPICEWOOD SUMMIT
Inspected within the last 6 months. Data reflects current conditions.
Juniper Village at Spicewood Summit has a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns about quality and safety within the facility. It ranks #496 out of 1,168 nursing homes in Texas, placing it in the top half, and #9 out of 27 in Travis County, meaning there are only a few local options that perform better. Unfortunately, the facility is worsening, with issues increasing from three in 2024 to five in 2025, and it has accumulated fines of $99,713, which is higher than 94% of Texas facilities, suggesting repeated compliance problems. Staffing is relatively strong with a rating of 4 out of 5 stars and RN coverage exceeding 94% of Texas facilities, although the staff turnover rate is 55%, which is average. Specific incidents of concern include a failure to ensure nursing staff were properly trained, which could put residents at risk for serious injury, and a leak in the dining area that compromised the comfort and safety of residents. Overall, while there are strengths in staffing and RN coverage, the facility faces serious concerns that families should consider.
- Trust Score
- F
- In Texas
- #496/1168
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Worse
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 55% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- $99,713 in fines. Lower than most Texas facilities. Relatively clean record.
- Skilled Nurses ✓ Good
- Each resident gets 65 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than 97% of Texas nursing homes. RNs are the most trained staff who catch health problems before they become serious.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 12 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, fire safety.
The Bad
Near Texas average (2.8)
Meets federal standards, typical of most facilities
Near Texas avg (46%)
Higher turnover may affect care consistency
Well above median ($33,413)
Moderate penalties - review what triggered them
The Ugly 12 deficiencies on record
May 2025
5 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pharmacy Services
(Tag F0755)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that drugs and biologicals used in the facility were stored properly for 1 (Nurse Cart) of 5 Medication carts reviewed...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0806
(Tag F0806)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received food that accommodated ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0584)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 1 of 1 dining room reviewed for envir...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 2 kitche...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Garbage Disposal
(Tag F0814)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to dispose of garbage and refuse properly for 2 of 2 dumpsters reviewed for garbage disposal.
The facility failed to ensure the ...
Read full inspector narrative →
May 2024
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible for 1 (Hall 100-A to 108A) of 3 halls reviewed for environmen...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Mar 2024
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for one of one kitchen rev...
Read full inspector narrative →
Oct 2023
2 deficiencies
2 IJ (2 affecting multiple)
CRITICAL
(K)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Deficiency F0726
(Tag F0726)
Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that licensed nurses had the specific competencies and skills...
Read full inspector narrative →
CRITICAL
(K)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Deficiency F0760
(Tag F0760)
Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free of any significant medication errors for ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jan 2023
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide residents respiratory care consistent with pr...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: 2 life-threatening violation(s), $99,713 in fines. Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 12 deficiencies on record, including 2 critical (life-threatening) violations. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
- • $99,713 in fines. Extremely high, among the most fined facilities in Texas. Major compliance failures.
- • Grade F (36/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Juniper Village At Spicewood Summit's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns JUNIPER VILLAGE AT SPICEWOOD SUMMIT an overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars, which is considered average nationally. Within Texas, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This mid-range rating indicates the facility meets federal standards but may have areas for improvement.
How is Juniper Village At Spicewood Summit Staffed?
CMS rates JUNIPER VILLAGE AT SPICEWOOD SUMMIT's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 55%, compared to the Texas average of 46%.
What Have Inspectors Found at Juniper Village At Spicewood Summit?
State health inspectors documented 12 deficiencies at JUNIPER VILLAGE AT SPICEWOOD SUMMIT during 2023 to 2025. These included: 2 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death) and 10 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.
Who Owns and Operates Juniper Village At Spicewood Summit?
JUNIPER VILLAGE AT SPICEWOOD SUMMIT is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 46 certified beds and approximately 25 residents (about 54% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in AUSTIN, Texas.
How Does Juniper Village At Spicewood Summit Compare to Other Texas Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Texas, JUNIPER VILLAGE AT SPICEWOOD SUMMIT's overall rating (3 stars) is above the state average of 2.8, staff turnover (55%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (3 stars) is at the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Juniper Village At Spicewood Summit?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations.
Is Juniper Village At Spicewood Summit Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, JUNIPER VILLAGE AT SPICEWOOD SUMMIT has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 2 Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 3-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Texas. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.
Do Nurses at Juniper Village At Spicewood Summit Stick Around?
JUNIPER VILLAGE AT SPICEWOOD SUMMIT has a staff turnover rate of 55%, which is 9 percentage points above the Texas average of 46%. Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Juniper Village At Spicewood Summit Ever Fined?
JUNIPER VILLAGE AT SPICEWOOD SUMMIT has been fined $99,713 across 1 penalty action. This is above the Texas average of $34,076. Fines in this range indicate compliance issues significant enough for CMS to impose meaningful financial consequences. Common causes include delayed correction of deficiencies, repeat violations, or care failures affecting resident safety. Families should ask facility leadership what changes have been made since these penalties.
Is Juniper Village At Spicewood Summit on Any Federal Watch List?
JUNIPER VILLAGE AT SPICEWOOD SUMMIT is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.