HOMESTEAD NURSING AND REHABILITATION OF BAIRD
Inspected within the last 6 months. Data reflects current conditions.
Homestead Nursing and Rehabilitation of Baird has a Trust Grade of B, indicating it is a good choice among nursing homes. It ranks #69 out of 1,168 facilities in Texas, placing it in the top half, but is #2 out of 2 in Callahan County, meaning there is only one other local option. The facility is improving, having reduced its issues from six in 2024 to three in 2025, though it still has some concerns regarding staffing with a turnover rate of 75%, significantly higher than the Texas average of 50%. While there have been no fines, which is a positive sign, specific incidents include the failure to provide adequate Registered Nurse coverage for at least eight consecutive hours daily, which could compromise residents' healthcare needs. Overall, the facility has strengths in its quality measures and health inspections, but the staffing issues raise important concerns for families considering this home.
- Trust Score
- B
- In Texas
- #69/1168
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 75% turnover. Very high, 27 points above average. Constant new faces learning your loved one's needs.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Texas facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ○ Average
- Each resident gets 40 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for Texas. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 13 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
29pts above Texas avg (46%)
Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
27 points above Texas average of 48%
The Ugly 13 deficiencies on record
May 2025
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive assessment accurately reflect...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centere...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0727
(Tag F0727)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on interviews and records review, the facility failed to provide the services of a registered nurse for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week for 5 (10/19/24, 10/20/24, 11/16/24, 11/...
Read full inspector narrative →
Apr 2024
6 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
MDS Data Transmission
(Tag F0640)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was electronically com...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident's person-centered comprehensive care plan was ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0661
(Tag F0661)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to complete discharge summaries that included a recapitulation of th...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a person-centered, comprehensive care plan fo...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to properly store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0727
(Tag F0727)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to utilize the services of a Registered Nurse for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, seven days a week for 75 of 183 days reviewed for RN Cov...
Read full inspector narrative →
May 2023
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(F)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0727
(Tag F0727)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to utilize the services of an RN for 8 consecutive hours 7 days a week and did not designate an RN as a Director of Nurses on a full-time ba...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(C)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Staffing Information
(Tag F0732)
Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to post on a daily basis information that included the facility name, current date, total number and actual hours worked by regis...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jan 2023
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0727
(Tag F0727)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to utilize the services of a RN for 8 consecutive hours 7 days a week and did not designate a RN as a DON on a full-time basis.
The facility...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the facility's ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Texas facilities.
- • 13 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
- • 75% turnover. Very high, 27 points above average. Constant new faces learning your loved one's needs.
About This Facility
What is Homestead Nursing And Rehabilitation Of Baird's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns HOMESTEAD NURSING AND REHABILITATION OF BAIRD an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Texas, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Homestead Nursing And Rehabilitation Of Baird Staffed?
CMS rates HOMESTEAD NURSING AND REHABILITATION OF BAIRD's staffing level at 2 out of 5 stars, which is below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 75%, which is 29 percentage points above the Texas average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs.
What Have Inspectors Found at Homestead Nursing And Rehabilitation Of Baird?
State health inspectors documented 13 deficiencies at HOMESTEAD NURSING AND REHABILITATION OF BAIRD during 2023 to 2025. These included: 12 with potential for harm and 1 minor or isolated issues.
Who Owns and Operates Homestead Nursing And Rehabilitation Of Baird?
HOMESTEAD NURSING AND REHABILITATION OF BAIRD is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by AVIR HEALTH GROUP, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 74 certified beds and approximately 30 residents (about 41% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in BAIRD, Texas.
How Does Homestead Nursing And Rehabilitation Of Baird Compare to Other Texas Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Texas, HOMESTEAD NURSING AND REHABILITATION OF BAIRD's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 2.8, staff turnover (75%) is significantly higher than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Homestead Nursing And Rehabilitation Of Baird?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's high staff turnover rate and the below-average staffing rating.
Is Homestead Nursing And Rehabilitation Of Baird Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, HOMESTEAD NURSING AND REHABILITATION OF BAIRD has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Texas. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Homestead Nursing And Rehabilitation Of Baird Stick Around?
Staff turnover at HOMESTEAD NURSING AND REHABILITATION OF BAIRD is high. At 75%, the facility is 29 percentage points above the Texas average of 46%. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?
Was Homestead Nursing And Rehabilitation Of Baird Ever Fined?
HOMESTEAD NURSING AND REHABILITATION OF BAIRD has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Homestead Nursing And Rehabilitation Of Baird on Any Federal Watch List?
HOMESTEAD NURSING AND REHABILITATION OF BAIRD is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.