Bremond Nursing and Rehabilitation Center

211 N Main, Bremond, TX 76629 (254) 746-7666
Government - Hospital district 82 Beds FUNDAMENTAL HEALTHCARE Data: November 2025 2 Immediate Jeopardy citations
Trust Grade
16/100
#661 of 1168 in TX
Last Inspection: August 2025

Inspected within the last 6 months. Data reflects current conditions.

Overview

Bremond Nursing and Rehabilitation Center has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns about the facility's quality and care. Ranked #661 out of 1168 nursing homes in Texas, it sits in the bottom half of the state, and as #3 of 3 in Robertson County, it is the least favorable option locally. The facility is showing some improvement, decreasing issues from 10 in 2024 to 7 in 2025, but still has critical areas of concern. Staffing is average with a 3/5 star rating, but turnover is high at 56%, which could affect continuity of care. Serious incidents include a resident who eloped from the facility and fractured a hip, as well as another resident who was not provided adequate support during a transfer, risking mobility decline. While there are some strengths, such as a good quality measures rating of 4/5 stars, the high number of deficiencies, including critical issues, raises important questions for families considering this home.

Trust Score
F
16/100
In Texas
#661/1168
Bottom 44%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Getting Better
10 → 7 violations
Staff Stability
⚠ Watch
56% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
Penalties
✓ Good
$48,392 in fines. Lower than most Texas facilities. Relatively clean record.
Skilled Nurses
⚠ Watch
Each resident gets only 22 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Texas. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
Violations
⚠ Watch
25 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Overall Rating
★★★☆☆
3.0
Staff Levels
★★★★☆
4.0
Care Quality
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2024: 10 issues
2025: 7 issues

The Good

  • 4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in quality measures, fire safety.

The Bad

2-Star Overall Rating

Below Texas average (2.8)

Below average - review inspection findings carefully

Staff Turnover: 56%

Near Texas avg (46%)

Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity

Federal Fines: $48,392

Above median ($33,413)

Moderate penalties - review what triggered them

Chain: FUNDAMENTAL HEALTHCARE

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

Staff turnover is elevated (56%)

8 points above Texas average of 48%

The Ugly 25 deficiencies on record

2 life-threatening
Aug 2025 6 deficiencies 1 IJ
CRITICAL (J)

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Deficiency F0676 (Tag F0676)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, observation and record review the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services for 1 of 11 (Re...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, observation and record review the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services for 1 of 11 (Resident #8) residents reviewed for transfer status. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #8, who was a 2 person assist in May 2025 and was changed to a mechanical transfer on 8/14/2025, did not suffer a decline in mobility. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 8/15/2025. The IJ template was provided to the facility on 8/15/2025 at 4:45PM. While the IJ was removed on 8/16/2025, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of pattern and a severity level of no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that was not immediate jeopardy due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems. This failure put residents at risk for decline in activities of daily living, decreased mobility, and serious harm. Findings included: Review of Resident # 8's Face sheet on 8/12/2025 reflected an [AGE] year-old, female admitted to the facility 12/13/2023 with a diagnosis of vascular dementia (dementia caused by problems with the blood vessels in the brain), unspecified abnormalities of gait and mobility (difficulties with walking), and hypertension (high blood pressure). Review of Reentry MDS for Resident #8 dated 2/17/2025 reflected a BIMS score of 15 (indicating no cognitive impairment). Resident #8's ability to move from Lying to Sitting, ability to move from sit to stand, and Toilet transfer is listed as partial/moderate assist. There are no categories of mobility for which Resident #8 had refused to be assessed. Speech Therapy, Physical Therapy, and Occupational Therapy sections reflected 0 minutes for each category for the period prior to last MDS. Restorative Program reflected 0 minutes of restorative therapy for the period prior to last MDS. Review of Reentry MDS for Resident #8 dated 05/22/2025 reflected a BIMS score of 15 (indicating no cognitive impairment). Resident #8's ability to move from Lying to Sitting, ability to move from sit to stand, and Toilet transfer is listed as partial/moderate assist. There are no categories of mobility for which Resident #8 had refused to be assessed. Speech Therapy, Physical Therapy, and Occupational Therapy sections reflected 0 minutes for each category for the period prior to last MDS. Restorative Program reflected 0 minutes of restorative therapy for the period prior to last MDS. Review of Orders for Resident #8 reviewed on 8/13/2025 reflected no order for mechanical lift transfer. Review of Care plan for Resident #8 in EMR (electronic medical record) reflected no problems or interventions related to mobility risks or transfers. Review of Paper Care Plan for Resident #8 reflected a Problem Area, Problem Start Date: 09/20/2024, Category: ADLs Functional Status/Rehabilitation Potential, [Resident #8's] ability to (ADL: e.g., transfer, walk in room, walk in corridor, dress, eat, toilet, maintain personal hygiene) has deteriorated R/T disease process Edited: 05/22/2025 Edited By: [ADON]. Approach section listed, Follow PT/OT/ST recommendations. Edited: 05/22/2025 Edited By: [ADON], Provide assistance for ADL as needed. Edited: 05/22/2025 Edited By: [ADON], Transfer extensive assist 1-2 Edited: 05/22/2025 Edited By: [ADON], and Report any further deterioration in status to physician. Edited: 05/22/2025 Edited By: [ADON]. Problem Area started on 04/29/2024, revised by ADON on 05/22/2025 reflected: [Resident #8] is at risk for skin impairment, age related, impaired mobility. The Approaches listed for the problem area reflected, PT/OT to evaluate for rehab potential. Edited: 05/22/2025 Edited by: ADON. Problem area dated 02/20/2024, Revised 07/25/2025 and Edited by Activity Director, reflected: [Resident #8] also enjoys going outside to feed the cat. In the related Approach area, it reflected, Staff will encourage, assist, or plan out of door activities for fresh air weather permitting. Edited: 05/22/2025 Edited by: ADON and Staff will encourage or assist involvement in social groups of interest such as bible study, current events, trivia. Problem area dated 2/26/2024, edited by ADON on 5/22/2025, reflected Category: Cognitive Loss/Dementia [Resident #8] appears to have recall deficit as evidenced by: Periods of paranoia, making false accusations then denies making them, lack of acceptance or understanding of safety issue related to her living environment, Poor decision making. Goal for this problem area reflected a long-term goal target date of 8/22/2025, reflected [Resident #8] will understand helpful reminders, will have needs met by staff as identified or anticipated, will have minimal negative emotional distress related to cognitive issues. As evidenced by documentation in the medical record. Edited: 5/22/2025 Edited By: ADON. Related approaches dated 5/22/2025 reflected, Continue to assess periodically for changes in cognition; adjust approaches to offer more assistance as needed. Review of Resident #8's Progress Notes in Paper Chart since 5/9/2025 -8/4/2025, reflected there were no notes indicating the resident was out of bed, nor are there any notes indicating refusals to get out of bed. There are no notes indicating a refusal of Physical or Occupational therapy during this time frame. Review of Physician Assessment for Resident #8 dated 7/12/2025 signed by Medical Director reflected fatigue, WC mobility, and weakness were chosen to describe Resident #8's general condition and extremities. There were handwritten notes reflecting, Pt. refuses BP meds and noncompliance with medications. There were no further notes regarding mobility or refusals of care. Review of Resident #8's most recent Occupational Therapy Discharge Summary prior to start of survey, for dates of service from 11/15/2024 to 11/18/2024, reflected, Discharge Recommendations: DC to this LTC facility under care of nursing. Restorative Program Established/Trained= Not indicated at this time Functional Maintenance Program Established/Trained=Not indicated at this time. Document was signed by OT F. Review of Resident #8's Summary of Occupational Therapy Daily skilled services signed by OT F dated 11/18/24 reflected, Pt (patient) declined to get out of bed, but finally agreed to work in the bed with therapy. Therapist went to pt's room x3 (three times) in order to get pt to participate. Once pt finally did agree to do therapy she was actually very cooperative and did everything requested of her. Pt education on the importance of movement/getting out of bed due to having pneumonia. Review of Physical Therapy Summary of Daily Skilled Services dated 11/18/2024 and signed by PT H, reflected, Patient requiring encouragement in order to participate proceeding to perform LE/UE (Lower Extremity/Upper Extremity) therex (therapeutic exercise) in all tolerable planes working on str (strength), endurance/ROM (range of motion) w cuing and breaks taken throughout session PRN (as needed).Review of Resident #8's Occupational Therapy Evaluation and Plan of Treatment dated 8/14/2025 and signed by OT G reflected, Personal Hygiene= Substantial/maximal assistance and Transfers section reflected, Recommended use of [mechanical] lift for all transfers. In the section labelled Reason for Therapy there is a note reflecting the following: Reason for Skilled Services: Patient requires skilled OT (occupational therapy) services to assess safety and Independence with ADLs (activities of daily living), develop and instruct on compensatory strategies, develop and instruct in exercise program, increase safety awareness, facilitate sitting tolerance and postural control, provision of pain management techniques, provision of modalities and strengthening, increase functional activity tolerance, and develop and instruct on adaptation techniques in order to enhance patient's quality of life by improving ability to return to prior level of skill performance. Review of Summary of Daily Skilled Services dated 8/14/2025 signed by OT G, the Response to Tx (treatment) section reflected Response to Session Interventions: actively participates with skilled interventions. Interview with Resident #8 on 8/12/25 at 9:41AM she stated I don't know when the last time I got up. Last time there were two people. Maybe seven days ago. She stated that she could not remember doing any therapy in the facility. She stated that she walked in the facility using a cane and now could no longer get out of bed. Observation of two person transfer on 8/13/2025 at 2:30PM with CNA A and CNA B revealed Resident #8 was lying in bed attempting to sit up. CNA A and CNA B watched Resident #8 attempt to sit up and did not offer assistance. Resident #8 stated that she was not able to sit up or stand on her own. She stated that she needed help. CNA A and CNA B did not assist after requests from resident. After 15 minutes of attempting to sit from a lying position, she refused to attempt any longer and requested to go stay in bed. She stated, I used to be able to sit and stand, but I can't anymore. No gait belt was observed in the room or in possession of the CNAs for the transfer and they were later found to be unable to properly apply a gait belt. In an interview with LVN D on 8/13/2025 at 2:47PM reflected that Resident #8 was known to be a two-person transfer. He stated that for a normal two-person transfer, if a person was struggling to sit up, the staff would assist the resident to a sitting position. In an interview with LVN C on 8/14/25 at 6:10AM she stated she had worked at the facility full time since September or October of 2024. She stated that she currently worked primarily night shifts but worked days and nights previously. She stated that Resident #8 was almost a mechanical lift now. She stated she knows Resident #8 was able to stand in May, but now she cannot. She stated she was transferring mostly by herself from the bed to the wheelchair and back at the beginning of the year with little assistance from staff. She stated that she could recall last seeing her transfer in March with little assistance from staff. She stated the last time she saw her transfer was around May with assist of two staff, where they had to physically assist her to sit up, which was not normal previously. She stated that she told dayshift at that time that the resident had shown a decline. She could not recall the date. She stated the resident refuses to get up at times. She stated that Resident #8 used to get up to feed the cats. She stated that refusals should be documented in the chart. She stated that residents have the right to refuse, but that staff should be building a relationship with the resident and try to find out the source of the refusals. She stated that residents should receive ongoing education and encouragement from staff with refusals of care. She stated that not getting out of bed can result in a decline in mobility. She stated that improper transfers can result in injuries.In an interview with CNA A on 8/14/25 at 8:45AM, she stated in the transfer with Resident #8 on 8/13/25 she should have assisted her to sit up. She denied having a gait belt for the transfer. She stated she does not use a gait belt on anyone in the facility during transfers. She stated she did not assist the resident with the transfer on 8/13/2025 because she was nervous. She stated it has been more than 3 months and less than 6 months since she's seen Resident #8 up out of bed. She stated the resident refuses to get out of bed a lot. She stated she does inform the nurse. She stated that the level of struggle she saw on 8/13/2025 from Resident #8 attempting to sit up for a transfer was new. She stated in the past, Resident #8 could help more. She stated the resident refuses a lot to get out of bed. She stated she does inform the nurse when the resident refuses. She stated that not providing assistance with transfers for residents that require assistance, can lead to residents feeling discouraged. She stated that if residents do not get out of bed they can lose their strength and ability to get out of bed. In an interview with CNA B on 8/14/2025 at 9:28AM, she said she worked at the facility for about a month. She said she had assisted Resident #8 out of bed with two people approximately two weeks ago. She stated she has seen the resident up, probably twice since she started working at the facility. She stated that she let her take her time to do some and then assisted when her when she needed it. She stated at that time she was not able to stand for the transfer. She stated they did get her in the wheelchair with two people. She stated each person stood on one side of the resident. She stated they then put their arm under her arm, and with the other hand, held on to the resident's pants. She stated that Resident #8 was able to sit up on her own two weeks prior during the transfer. She stated the resident refuses at times. She stated that not providing assistance with transfers for those residents that need it, can lead to resident' potentially giving up and possibly not wanting to try to get up. She stated that if residents do not get out of bed when they are able, they might lose their ability to get out of bed. In an interview with ADON on 8/14/2025 at 7:07AM, she stated that Resident #8 was a two-person transfer. She stated that she frequently refuses therapy. She stated there are no therapy notes for 2025. She stated she would print the last three therapy assessments for review by surveyor. She stated that there was no documentation of refusals of therapy in resident records for nursing in the last 3 months or therapy services documentation in 2025. She stated the Care Plan for the resident included being resistive to care at times, but did not include refusals of therapy. She stated she was not sure if the physical or occupational therapist spoke directly to the resident regarding her therapy opportunities and the risks of not participating in rehabilitative services. She stated that the Resident #8 refused therapy to her after her most recent hospitalization at the end of May, but that she did not document the refusal. In an interview with OT G on 8/14/2025 at 11:40AM, she stated that she worked with a different company than the previous therapists at the facility. She stated she started in the facility as a PRN (As needed) Occupational Therapist when the new company took over at the beginning of the month. She stated that she met Resident #8 on the morning of 8/14/2025. She stated that she reviewed her records. She stated that after speaking with Resident #8, she is going to recommend a mechanical lift for her transfers. She stated she has never seen it documented who has a gait belt in the facility, but if you are standing and moving them, they should have a gait belt on unless they are independent transfers or a mechanical lift is used for transfer. She stated that during transfers staff can hurt the resident's shoulders, cause shearing, or staff could drop them without a gait belt or with improper use of gait belt. She was not sure if Resident #8 was a mechanical lift prior to this assessment but stated that if a resident was screened previously as partial assist and then they are later screened as requiring a mechanical lift, that it would be considered a change in condition for the resident. In an interview with RNC on 8/14/2025 at 12:04 PM, she stated that she had been in the facility for 8 days, since the change of ownership. She stated that she was functioning as the Director of Nursing prior to the DON taking on her role at the facility. She stated that there was not a DON prior to the change of ownership, which would make the ADON responsible for supplies and resident care prior to 8/5/2025. She stated that the current owners use a different therapy company than was used previously by the facility. She stated that all residents who were not independent or mechanical lift transfers should have a gait belt on for transfers. She stated that if a resident was reaching and trying to sit up during a transfer that she would assist them with sitting position. She stated that if a resident made an effort to transfer, she would assist them with the rest of the transfer. She stated that Resident #8 should be assessed quarterly by therapy services. She stated that if there are any signs of decline, residents should be evaluated by therapy and treated per their recommendations. She stated that their responsibility as a facility is to maintain or improve status of residents, unless the situation can be helped. She stated that if a resident screens as needing a mechanical lift, when their previous recommendation was for partial assistance with transfers, that it would indicate a change in condition. She stated that if we are not assisting a resident to get out of bed, they can decline. She stated that residents do have the right to refuse care. She stated that she expected staff to encourage residents to get out of bed, to educate them regarding the consequences of not getting out of bed, to get family involved if applicable, and to perform passive range of motion if they continue to refuse to help prevent a decline in mobility. She stated that staff should try to find the source of why the resident is refusing care and address their underlying concerns. In an interview with Resident #8 on 8/14/2025 at 1:05PM she stated that she feels unhopeful when she attempts to transfer. She stated that she trusts one male staff member to transfer her. Resident observed lying in bed during the interview. In a phone interview with facility NP on 8/15/2025 at 12:04PM, she stated that she does not know of any degenerative conditions for Resident #8 that would make a decline in mobility unavoidable. She stated that the resident has some conditions which could cause pain, but that the resident nor the facility has reported an increase in pain. She stated that Resident #8 cannot transfer or stand without assistance from staff. She stated that to her knowledge, the resident could stand briefly to be assisted to the wheelchair. She stated that a new order for a mechanical lift would constitute a change in condition regarding the mobility status for Resident #8. She stated that she knows the resident to refuse care and transfers at times. She stated that she last observed the resident get up with staff assistance of 3-4 staff, gait belt, and walker on 5/23/25 when she ordered a urine culture for the resident. She stated that the extra staff present during the transfer where there to assist with collecting the urine sample. She stated that she knows Resident #8 to be a 2-person transfer. She stated that she saw a note from the morning stating that Resident #8 is now a mechanical lift transfer. She stated that when a resident is refusing to get out of bed, they should be evaluated to see if there is a change in condition. She stated that when a resident is refusing, the facility needs to ensure they are doing what they can and that it isn't just easier for staff not to get her up. She stated that not getting out of bed could contribute to a decline in mobility. She stated that not using a gait belt or using gait belts in properly could result in a fall or injuries to the resident. She stated it was a fundamental skill for a CNA and anyone who transfers residents to know how to use a gait belt. She stated she could not recall any injuries with transfers that would have warranted a gait belt. In an interview with ADON on 8/15/2025 at 1:50PM, she stated she could not believe she did not notice that Resident #8 had not been out of bed. She stated she was not aware that Resident had a change in mobility prior to the OT assessment on 8/14/2025. She stated that she could not recall seeing Resident #8 out of bed in the last few weeks. She stated that she was responsible for monitoring resident care and ensuring appropriate care was provided to Resident #8 at the time of the decline. She stated she was responsible for updating care plans at this time also. She stated that gait belt should be included in the care plan for residents that require a gait belt with transfers. She stated that she informed the physician and psychiatry about Resident #8's refusals of care in the past. She stated that she doesn't know exactly why the resident would refuse to get up recently. She stated that in the past she has given reasons like that she does not want to be forced to do things and that she does not want to put on a show for anyone. She did not recall when she stated this, but stated it was not directly related to a recent occurrence. She stated that Resident #8 does not have any family to her knowledge. She stated that Resident #8 is her own responsible party. She stated that staff try to encourage her to get out of bed with things that she likes. She stated that the facility tried to put her on skilled services when she got back from a hospital stay on 6/29/2025, but the resident refused at that time. She stated she does not have any documentation in the resident records to state that she was evaluated and subsequently refused offer of therapy. Observation of Resident #8 on 8/15/2025 at 1:56PM revealed the resident sleeping in her bed. In a follow up interview with RNC on 8/15/2025 at 2:54PM she stated that there was no evidence that an IDT meet was done related to her refusals of care. In a follow up interview with ADON on 8/15/2025 at 2:54PM she stated that there was no QAPI meeting in which Resident #8's refusals of care were discussed. In an interview with the ADMIN on 8/15/25 at 3:43 PM, he stated that he wanted everyone in the building to thrive. He stated everyone who wants to be up out of bed, should be allowed or assisted as needed to get up. He stated that therapy has a role in assisting with mobility needs of the residents. He stated all refusals should be documented. He stated the impact of not getting a resident out of bed could result in weakness. He stated that he would defer to nursing for specifics in the causes of a decline in mobility. He stated refusals for care and therapy should be care planned. He stated that after a few times of refusing, staff should notify the doctor or the NP. He stated that the facility does have to honor a resident's right to refuse. He stated it is the facility's obligation to talk to them and try to find out why they are refusing. He stated they usually have multiple staff attempt to talk to a resident about refusals of care. He stated that psychiatry services can occasionally assist with refusals of care. He stated that he was responsible for ordering the supplies for this facility. He stated there is a supply list at the nurses' station where staff can add needed supplies. He stated he made orders every Tuesday based on the list. He stated he was not aware there was a lack of gait belts available for resident use. He stated he was not aware that gait belts were not being used with residents. He stated that not using a gait belt could cause a fall or injuries, including discomfort to the residents. He stated his expectation was that residents who need gait belts should have them. Review of facility policy on Safe Resident Handling/Transfers (no date) reflected, All residents require safe handling when transferred to prevent or minimize the risk for injury to themselves and the employees that assist them.Staff will be educated on the use of safe handling/transfer practices to include use of mechanical lift devices upon hire, annually and as the need arises or changes in equipment occur.Staff members are expected to maintain compliance with safe handling/transfer practices. Failure to maintain compliance may lead to disciplinary action up to and including termination of employment.Review of Facility ADL policy (no date) stated: The facility will, based on the resident's comprehensive assessment and consistent with the resident's needs and choices, ensure a resident's abilities in ADLs do not deteriorate unless deterioration is unavoidable. Care and services will be provided for the following activities of daily living: Bathing, dressing, grooming and oral care; Transfer and ambulation; Toileting; Eating to include meals and snacks; and Using speech, language or other functional communication systems.Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: Conditions which may demonstrate unavoidable decline in ADLs include: Natural progression of the resident's disease state with known functional decline. Deterioration of the resident's physical condition associated with the onset of an acute physical or mental disability while receiving care to restore or maintain functional abilities. Refusal of care and treatment by the resident or his/her representative to maintain functional abilities after efforts by the facility to inform and educate about the benefits/risks of the proposed care and treatment; counsel and/or offer alternatives to the resident or representative.The facility will maintain individual objectives of the care plan and periodic review and evaluation. The ADMIN was notified of Immediate Jeopardy on 08/15/2025 at 4:35 PM and the need for a Plan of Removal. The Plan of Removal was accepted on 08/16/2025 at 11:18 AM and was as follows: On 8/12/2025 a recertification survey was initiated at facility. On 08/15/2025 the surveyor provided an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) Template for SNF notification that the Regulatory Services has determined that the condition at the facility constitutes an immediate threat to resident health and safety. Notification of the Immediate Jeopardy states as follows: F-676 - Activities of Daily Living (F676 The facility failed to ensure provide the necessary care and services to ensure that a resident's abilities in activities of daily living do not diminish unless circumstances of the individual's clinical condition demonstrate that such diminution was unavoidable. This includes the facility ensuring that: S483.24(a)(1) A resident is given the appropriate treatment and services to maintain or improve his or her ability to carry out the activities of daily living to include mobility and transfers. Mobility Decline) 1. Immediate Actions Taken for Those Residents IdentifiedAction: Resident #8 immediately evaluated by nursing staff. Care plan updated to reflect current mobility status, interventions to maintain or improve function, and therapy recommendations. Resident requires a mechanical lift. Order placed in Point Click Care (PCC) for mechanical lift transfers. Physical Therapy referral placed in PCC for evaluation and treatment. Person(s) Responsible: Director of Nursing (DON), Assistant Director of Nursing, and Regional Nurse Consultant, and/or DesigneeDate: 08/15/2025 by noon Action: Facility-wide audit of all residents with transfer needs conducted to ensure correct transfer methods are documented, appropriate equipment is available at point of care, and no additional residents have experienced an undocumented decline. If equipment is not available, the DON/Designee will initiate an urgent order through the facility's contracted vendor, provide interim safe transfer methods, and ensure staff are trained on the temporary intervention until the equipment is in place. Any identified changes were addressed immediately through therapy referral and care plan updates. No changes identified.Person(s) Responsible: Director of Nursing (DON), Assistant Director of Nursing, and Regional Nurse Consultant, and/or DesigneeDate: 08/15/2025 by noon Action: All licensed nurses, CNAs, and therapy staff educated on Safe Resident Handling/Transfers policy, proper gait belt use, and immediate reporting of mobility declines to the DON and/or ADON. Competency validation with return demonstration completed prior to resident care. Staff members will be educated prior to working their next shift. Staff who are not present will receive education via the telephone and complete the competency with return demonstration prior to working their next shift. All new hires and agency staff will receive education and competency evaluation with return demonstration prior to providing resident care. Person(s) Responsible: Director of Nursing (DON), Assistant Director of Nursing, and Regional Nurse Consultant, and/or Designee Date: 08/17/2025 by noon 2. How the Facility Identified Other Possibly Affected Residents: Action: 100% audit of all residents requiring assistance with transfers conducted to ensure accuracy of transfer status, care plans, and availability of required equipment. No other residents identified.Person(s) Responsible: Director of Nursing (DON), Assistant Director of Nursing, and Regional Nurse Consultant, and/or Designee Date: 08/15/2025 3. Measures Put into Place/System Changes to remove the immediacy, and what date these actions occurred: Action: Policy on Safe Resident Handling/Transfers reviewed with no changes made. Staff members will be educated on policy prior to working their next shift. Staff who are not present will receive education via the telephone and will sign the in-service sheet prior to working their next shift. All new hires and agency staff will receive education prior to providing resident care.Person(s) Responsible: VP of Clinical Operations, Director of Nursing (DON), Assistant Director of Nursing, and Regional Nurse Consultant, and/or DesigneeDate: 08/15/2025 policy reviewed08/17/2025 by noon for education of all staffAction: Change in Condition Protocol reviewed with no changes made. Staff members will be educated on policy prior to working their next shift. Staff who are not present will receive education via the telephone and will sign the in-service sheet prior to working their next shift. All new hires and agency staff will receive education prior to providing resident care.Person(s) Responsible: VP of Clinical Operations, Director of Nursing (DON), Assistant Director of Nursing, and Regional Nurse Consultant, and/or DesigneeDate: 08/15/2025 policy reviewed08/17/2025 by noon for education of all staff 4. How the Corrective Actions Will be Monitored/Ensure Comprehension, by whom and for how long: Action: All licensed nurses, CNAs, and therapy staff received immediate education on Safe Resident Handling/Transfers policy, including proper use of gait belts and mechanical lifts, and the requirement to report any resident mobility changes to nursing leadership. Staff completed a competency validation with return demonstration prior to providing further resident care. Staff not on-site were educated via telephone and completed competency validation prior to their next scheduled shift. All agency and new hire staff will receive the same education and competency validation prior to resident care assignment. Person(s) Responsible: DON, ADON, and/or DesigneeDate: 08/17/2025 by noon for education of all staffAction: DON/designee will conduct a minimum of 5 random transfer observations per shift for 4 weeks to ensure: proper transfer method is being used per care plan and gait belts/mechanical lifts are available and used appropriately. Results documented on Transfer Audit Log; noncompliance addressed immediately with re-education.Person(s) Responsible: DON, ADON, and/or DesigneeDate: Ongoing x 60 days Action: Interdisciplinary team will review all audit results in QAPI weekly for 8 weeks, then monthly for 4 months. Any identified trends will result in additional training.Person(s) Responsible: Administrator, DON, Rehab DirectorDate: Ongoing QAPI-Action: Medical Director notified of the deficient practice/IJ and Plan of Removal.Person(s) Responsible: DON, Administrator, and/or DesigneeDate: 08/14/2025 Monitoring facility's plan of removal was completed on 8/16/2025 as follows: Review of Resident #8's Occupational Therapy Evaluation and Plan of Treatment dated 8/14/2025 and signed by OT G, reflected that Resident #8 was evaluated on 8/14/2025 by nursing staff and occupational therapist. Resident #8's Care plan was updated on 8/14/2025 to reflect mechanical lift transfer and related care. Resident #8's Physician orders updated on 8/15/2025 to reflect mechanical lift transfer. There is a physician order for PT/OT (physical therapy/occupational therapy) to Evaluate and Treat dated 8/15/2025. In an interview with RNC on 08/16/2025 at 1:00PM, she stated that Resident #8 was transferred to hospital on 8/15/2025 at 8:08AM for sore throat and cough. She was not available for interview at that time. In an interview with ADON on 8/16/2025 at 1:53PM, she stated that the Facility-wide 100% audit of all residents with transfer [
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activiti...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for two of eight residents (Resident #2 and Resident #7) reviewed for ADL care. The facility failed to ensure Resident # 2 and Resident #7's nails were cleaned and did not have any rough edges on 08/12/2025. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving services or care, diminished quality of life, and decreased self-esteem. Findings included: Record review of Resident #2's face sheet , dated 08/13/2025, reflected an [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included unspecified dementia ,unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety ( a group of diseases and illnesses that affect your thinking, memory, and reasoning without behaviors), blindness right eye , low vision left eye ( lack of vision - it interferes with daily activities), and muscle weakness ( decreased ability to move, lift, or hold objects). Record review of Resident #2's Annual MDS, dated [DATE], reflected the resident had a BIMS score of 5, which indicated his cognition was severely impaired. Resident #2 required supervision or touching assistance with the following: personal hygiene, showers, upper and lower body dressing and, toileting hygiene. Record review of Resident# 2's Comprehensive Care Plan, revised on 05/08/2025, reflected Resident #2 ‘s ability to maintain personal hygiene has deteriorated. Intervention: Resident #2 required assistance with ADLs. Record review of Resident #2's nurses notes and there was not any refusal of nail care documented from 08/01/2025 thru 08/12/2025. Observation and interview on 08/12/2025 at 11:01 AM, revealed Resident #2 was in his room lying in bed. He had a blackish/ brownish substance underneath the middle and ring fingernails on his right hand. Resident # 2's middle fingernail on his right hand was uneven around the edges. Resident #2 was not interviewable. Record review of Resident #7's face sheet, dated 08/13/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old- male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included unspecified lack of coordination (the inability to smoothly and precisely control bodily movements), dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic, mood and anxiety ( a group of diseases and illnesses that affect your thinking, memory, and reasoning without behaviors), and muscle weakness (decreased ability to move, lift, or hold objects). Record review of Resident #7's Annual MDS, dated [DATE], reflected the resident rarely/never understood. He had poor short- and long-term memory recall. His decision-making ability was severely impaired. Resident #7 required supervision and touching assistance with the following: personal hygiene, lower/ upper body dressing and, oral hygiene. He required partial to moderate assistance- (Helper does less than half the effort) with the following: Showers and toileting. Record review of Resident #7's Comprehensive Care Plan, dated 06/16/2025, reflected Resident # 7 was at risk for deterioration in ADLs (bed mobility, transfers, personal hygiene, dressing, eating, walking and locomotion). Provide assistance for ADLs as needed. Record review of Resident #7's nurses notes and there was not any refusal of nail care documented from 08/01/2025 thru 08/12/2025. Observation and interview on 08/12/2025 at 10:15 AM, revealed Resident #7 was in his room lying in bed. He had a blackish/ brownish substance underneath the middle ring and fore fingernails on his right hand. Resident #2's ring and middle fingernail on her right hand were uneven around the edges. He was not interviewable. In an interview on 08/13/2025 at 2:31 PM, LVN D stated the nurses were responsible for residents with diagnosis of diabetes with nail care such as trimming, cleaning, filing. He stated the CNAs were responsible for all other residents' nail care. LVN D stated if a resident had brownish/blackish substance underneath their nails and if a resident swallowed the substance there was a possibility a resident may become ill, such as stomach problems nausea and vomiting. He stated she would need to ask staff questions for the reason nail care was not completed on Resident #2 and Resident #7. LVN D stated no one reported to him that Resident #2 or Resident #7 refused nail care. He stated anytime a resident refused care it was documented in the nurses' notes. In an interview on 08/13/2025 at 2:45 PM, CNA H stated the CNA s were responsible for cleaning, trimming, and filing all residents' nails except for the residents with a diagnosis of diabetes (a disease occurs when blood sugar is too high). She stated the nurses were responsible for all the residents' nails with a diagnosis of diabetes. CNA H stated the residents' nails were usually cleaned on Sundays, their shower days and as needed. She stated if there was a blackish substance on the residents' fingertips or underneath their nails and the resident swallowed the blackish substance there was a possibility a resident may become ill, such as vomiting and diarrhea. CNA H stated she was in-serviced on cleaning, filing, and trimming residents' nails but she did not recall the date. She stated she had given care to Resident # 2 and Resident #7, and they did not refuse nail care. In an interview on 08/13/2025 at 2:58 PM, CNA I stated the CNAs were responsible for cleaning, trimming, and filing all residents' nails except for the residents with a diagnosis of diabetes. She stated the nurses were responsible for all the residents' nails with a diagnosis of diabetes. CNA, I stated the residents' nails were usually cleaned on Sundays, their shower days and as needed. She stated if there was a blackish substance on the residents' fingertips or underneath their nails and the resident swallowed the blackish substance there was a possibility a resident may become ill, such as nausea and diarrhea. CNA I stated she was in-serviced on cleaning, filing, and trimming residents' nails but she did not recall the date. She stated she had given care to Resident # 2 and Resident # 7, and they did not refuse nail care. CNA I stated she did not know the last time these residents' nails were trimmed or cleaned she would need to check the medical records. In an interview on 07/31/25 at 10:20 AM, the ADON stated if a resident ingested the blackish substance on their fingers or underneath their fingernails, there was a possibility the substance may be some type of bacteria, however it would be difficult to determine if the blackish/ brownish substance was bacteria. She stated it was a possibility a resident may become ill with stomach issues such as vomiting and nausea if they ingested the blackish/ brownish substance. She stated the CNAs were responsible for all residents' nails such as cleaning, trimming, and filing except for the residents with diabetes. She stated for any resident with a diagnosis of diabetes the nurse was responsible for these residents' fingernails. The ADON stated the nurse supervisor was responsible for monitoring CNAs giving ADL care which included nail care, and the ADON and DON was responsible for monitoring the nurse supervisors. Record review of the facility's Policy on Nail Care, not dated, reflected The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for the provision of care to a resident's nails for good grooming and health. Routine cleaning and inspection of nails will be provided during ADL care on an ongoing basis. Routine nail care, to include trimming and filing, will be provided on a regular schedule. Nail care will be provided between scheduled occasions as the need arises. Nails should be kept smooth to avoid skin injury.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0679 (Tag F0679)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide, based on the comprehensive assessment and care...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide, based on the comprehensive assessment and care plan and the preferences of each resident, an ongoing activities program to support residents in their choice of activities, both facility sponsored group and individual activities, and independent activities, designed to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, encouraging both independence and interaction in the community for one of five residents ( Resident # 3) reviewed for activities. The facility failed to provide Resident #3 in room activities on the dates of 07/03/2025 thru 08/11/2025. This failure could place residents at risk for boredom, depression, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident# 3's face sheet, dated 08/14/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #3 had diagnoses which included depression, unspecified ( a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), generalized anxiety disorder ( a mental health disorder that produces fear, worry, and a constant feeling of being overwhelmed), and unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety ( a condition where individuals experience cognitive decline consistent memory loss, impaired thinking, etc. without behaviors). Record review of Resident#3's Annual MDS Assessment, dated 10/02/2024, reflected Resident #3 had a BIMS score of 0, which indicated her cognition was severely impaired. Resident #3 was not capable of responding to questions of her activity preferences. Record review of Resident #3's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 05/31/2025, reflected Resident #3 was rarely/never understood. The staff completed Resident #3 cognitive assessment. Resident #3 decision making ability was severely impaired (never/rarely make decisions). She had poor short- and long-term memory recall. Record review of Resident #3's Comprehensive Care Plan reflected (problem created on 08/15/2022) Resident #3 was dependent on staff for meeting emotional, intellectual, physical, and social needed related to Alzheimer's (a brain disorder that slowly destroys memory and thinking skills, and eventually, the ability to carry out the simplest tasks). Resident #3 care plan (revised on 08/13/2025) reflected Resident required personalized engagement to support psychosocial wellbeing. Resident #3 will participate in at least one 1:1 activity of choice a minimum of two times per week to enhance social interaction and emotional wellness. Monitor for changes in engagement levels and adjust the type of timing of 1:1 activities as needed. Record Review of the Activity In Room Participation record for the months of July 2025 and August 2025 reflected Resident #3 did not receive in room visits from 07/03/2025 thru 08/11/2025. Observation and interview on 08/12/2025 at 10:05 AM Resident was in her room lying in bed. Resident # 3's television was not on and there was not any stimulation in resident's room. Resident #3 was not interviewable. Interview on 08/14/2025 at 8:30 AM, the Activity Director stated Resident #3 did not receive in room activities from 07/03/2025 thru 08/11/2025. The Activity Director stated she was expected to ensure all residents received activities based on their preferences and their physical abilities. She stated if residents were not coming out of their room, the residents were to be provided in room activities. The Activity Director stated she provided in room activities at least twice a week. She stated there was not an excuse why Resident #3 did not receive in room visits. The Activity Director stated if a resident was not receiving activities on a consistent basis there was a potential a resident may become bored, depressed, or have a decline in their quality of life. Interview on 08/14/2025 at 10:45 AM, the Administrator stated he expected in room activities be provided to the residents needing these types of activities. He stated if a resident was not receiving in room activities there was a possibility a resident may become depressed, bored and isolated. He stated the Activity Director was responsible for all activities in the facility. He stated the Administrator would be responsible for monitoring the Activity Director. Record review of the facility's Activity Policy, dated not dated, reflected It is the policy of this facility to provide an ongoing program to support residents in their choice of activities based on their comprehensive assessment, care plan, and preferences. Facility-sponsored group, individual, and independent activities will be designed to meet the interests of each resident, as well as support their physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Activities will encourage both independence and interaction within the community. Activities may be conducted in different ways: one-to-one programs, person appropriate- activities relevant to the specific needs, interests, culture, background, etc. for the resident.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and con...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections and follow accepted national standards for one of five residents reviewed for infection control practices. (Resident #48). The facility failed to ensure that staff wore a gown during medication administration via g-tube (a tube inserted into the stomach) on 08/13/2025 for Resident #27 when the resident was on isolation precautions ordered 08/12/2025. There was no Enhanced Barrier Precaution signage on the door nor PPE (personal protective equipment) inside or outside of Resident 27's room. This failure could place the residents, staff and visitors risk for cross contamination. Findings included: Review of Resident #27's Face sheet dated 8/13/2025 reflected a [AGE] year-old, male admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Cerebral Infarction (a temporary lapse of blood flow to the brain), Neurosyphilis (sexually transmitted infection that affects the brain and spinal cord causing cognitive changes), and Hypertension (high blood pressure). Review of Resident #27's orders reflected an order dated 8/12/2025 for Enhanced Barrier Precautions: Resident requires enhanced barrier precautions. Wear PPE per facility protocol.[BH1] [EM2] Review of Resident #27's Care Plan reflected a Focus Area stating, Resident requires Enhanced Barrier Precautions due to colonization or infection with a multidrug resistant organism (MDRO) or is at high risk per CDC criteria r/t g tube Date Initiated: 08/12/2025. Related Interventions/Tasks reflected, [NAME] gown and gloves before high-contact resident care activities (e.g., dressing, bathing, toileting, device care, wound care), Date Initiated: 08/12/2025, Maintain a supply of gowns and gloves inside or outside the room for ease of access, Date Initiated: 08/12/2025, and Place signage outside of residents room indicating Enhanced Barrier Precautions are in use (do not include specific diagnosis), Date Initiated: 08/12/2025. Observation of medication administration with LVN D on 08/13/2025 at 7:59AM[BH3] [EM4] , revealed LVN D did not wear a gown while administering medications via G-tube for Resident #27. There was no Enhanced Barrier Precaution signage on the door. There was no PPE (personal protective equipment) inside or outside of the room. In an interview with LVN D on 8/13/2025 at 8:30AM, he stated that Resident #27 should be on enhanced barrier precautions. He stated that he should have worn a gown during medication administration with a g-tube. He stated it was the responsibility of nurses and CNAs to initiate EBP for newly admitted residents. He stated that the potential impact to the resident of not wearing a gown with medication administration via g-tube could lead to infections. In an interview with ADON on 8/13/2025 at 8:39AM, she stated her expectation was that staff use gowns and gloves when providing direct care to a resident or handling the medical device for a resident, as indicated by the guidelines for enhance barrier precautions, for those residents who require it. She stated that enhance barrier precautions should be followed with g-tube medication administration. She stated it was the responsibility of nursing staff and nursing administration to implement EBP for a new resident. She stated that she printed the signs and thought they were being posted and PPE was set out by staff. She stated the potential impact to the resident of not following the guidelines is possible exposure to infection for the resident receiving care and potentially spread infection to other residents in the facility. In an interview with RNC on 8/14/2025 at 12:04PM, she stated that the was the current Infection Preventionist for the facility. She stated that she asked the newly hired DON and ADON to put the EBP sign on the door for Resident #27. She stated that she did not go back to check that it was done. She stated that Resident #27 should be on EBP for his g-tube. She stated that the potential impact to the resident of not using a gown and gloves during medication administration is the potential for cross contamination. In an interview with NP on 8/15/2025 at 12:04AM, she stated that she expected the facility to follow the guidelines for enhance barrier precautions, when appropriate. She stated the potential impact to the residents of not following the guidelines could be exposure to infection, actual infection, or issues with the device. In an interview with ADMIN on 8/15/2025 at 3:43PM, he stated that residents with g-tubes should be on enhanced barrier precautions. He stated his expectation was that staff follow the guidelines while providing care and giving medications to residents with enhance barrier precautions. Requested facility policy for Medication Administration and Enhanced Barrier precautions via email on 08/13/2025 at 09:45AM. No policy or related policy was provided before exit. Review of the CDC[BH5] guidelines for Enhanced Barrier Precautions in Nursing Homes dated 05/20/2024 reflected, EBP are indicated for residents with any of the following: Wounds and/or indwelling medical devices even if the resident is not known to be infected or colonized with a MDRO.Indwelling medical device examples include central lines, urinary catheters, feeding tubes, and tracheostomies. A peripheral intravenous line (not a peripherally inserted central catheter) is not considered an indwelling medical device for the purpose of EBP. EBP should be used for any residents who meet the above criteria, wherever they reside in the facility.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure that resident environment remained as free fro...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure that resident environment remained as free from accident hazards as is possible, by not providing adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 4 of 11 residents (Resident #18, Resident #23, Resident #5, and Resident #3) reviewed for safe transfers. 1. The facility failed to ensure two staff members transferred Resident #18 via mechanical lift which resulted in Resident #18 suffering a skin tear due to being transferred by one staff member on 6/04/2025. 2. The facility failed to ensure CNA A and CNA B knew how to competently use transfer assistive device (gait belt) when performing a transfer from recliner to wheelchair for Resident #5 on 8/13/2025. 3. The facility failed to ensure that staff used any assistive devices (gait belt) when standing Resident #23 at the bedside resulting in a fall on 6/05/2025. 4. The facility failed to ensure that staff used any transfer assistive devices (gait belt) when transferring Resident #3 between bed and geri-chair. This failure could place residents at risk for serious injury, fracture, or death. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #18's Face sheet dated 9/18/2020 reflected a [AGE] year-old, male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included muscle wasting atrophy right and left shoulder (muscles shrinking and becoming weaker), rheumatoid arthritis (a chronic disease where the immune system attacks the joints), abnormalities of gait (abnormal way of walking) , contracture to right and left knee (condition where muscles, tendons, ligaments, or skin shorten and stiffen), and muscle wasting and atrophy of lower leg (muscles shrinking and becoming weaker). Review of Resident #18's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] reflected a BIMS score of 15 (no cognitive impairment). In Section GG- Functional Abilities section GG0170. Mobility, Resident #18 is coded as dependent on staff for Chair/bed-to-chair transfers and, Not attempted due to medication condition or safety concerns for sit to stand transfer. Review of Resident #18's Paper Care Plan reflected a Problem area stating, Problem Start Date: 06/05/2025 Category: ADLs Functional Status/Rehabilitation Potential Resident presents with mobility limitations and requires [mechanical lift] for transfers Created: 06/05/2025 Created by: [ADON]. Related Goal area reflected, Long Term Goal Target Date: 09/05/2025 Staff will safely transfer resident utilizing a [mechanical lift] Created: 06/05/2025 Created by: [ADON]. Problem initiated for, Category: ADLs Functional Status/Rehabilitation Potential [Resident #18] requires assistance with ADL's d/t impaired mobility and incontinence of bowel and bladder. Edited by: 05/08/2025 Edited by: [ADON] with a related Approach stating, Transfer: Total with 1-2 person assist (utilize a [mechanical lift]) Wheelchair for mobility; gel cushion to wheelchair Edited: 05/08/2025 Edited by: [ADON] Review of orders dated 8/15/2025 for Resident #18 reflected an order dated 08/14/2025 reflecting, [Mechanical Lift] transfer for safety and non-weight bearing status. Review of Facility Incident/Accident Investigation Worksheet dated 6/05/2025 reflected an incident involving Resident #18 on 6/04/2025 at 11:30AM. The section titled, Describe Exactly What Happened reflected, Resident reports during transfer mech (mechanical) lift [with]sling, sling rubbed against arm causing S/T [with] minimal bleeding. No other injuries were found. [Resident] alert and oriented. No swelling or bruising noted. Under the Witness section of the form CNA A is listed as the only witness. The Follow up/steps to prevent reoccurrence and person(s) responsible: section reflected a note stating, Inservice staff proper use of lift +sling during transfer. Signature on form is illegible. Review of Inservice initiated by ADON and dated 6/5/2025 reflected, 2. When using the [mechanical] lift-please make sure sling is positioned appropriately so that it is not causing skin tears. Never use a [mechanical] lift without 2 people. Inservice signed by all staff. Review of Paper Progress Note reflected an entry on 6/4/25 stating, Resident report during transfer using mech (mechanical) lift + sling, his arm rubbed against skin causing S/T to rt (right) [lower] forearm, minimal bleeding, area was cleaned [with] wound cleanser. TAO (triple antibiotic ointment) + light dressing applied, no other injuries noted. Review of Skin Assessment for Resident #18 dated 6/4/2025 reflected a note stating, S/T (skin tear) to L (left) upper arm + R (right) lower forearm. The signature is illegible with LVN after the name. Review of staff competencies for [Mechanical] lift/Transfer prior to start of survey on 08/12/2025 reflected 7 total staff, including nurses and nurse aides, had met the Standards of Practice outlined on the form. Review of Employee List provided by facility on 8/12/25 reflected 18 total nurses and nurse aides employed at the facility on that day. 2. Review of Resident #5's Face sheet dated 8/15/2025 reflected a [AGE] year-old, female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included muscle wasting atrophy right and left shoulder (muscles shrinking and becoming weaker), dementia, unsteadiness on feet, anxiety disorder (intense and excessive worry or fear), and cerebral infarction (a temporary lapse of blood flow to the brain). Review of Resident #5's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] reflected a BIMS score of 6 (severe cognitive impairment). In Section GG - Functional Abilities, the coding reflected that Resident #5 is dependent on staff to move from sitting to standing position and to transfer from a bed to a chair or wheelchair. Review of Resident #5's Orders dated 8/15/2025 reflected an order dated 8/14/2025 for, [Mechanical Lift] for all transfer due to non-weight bearing status. Review of Resident #5's Care Plan in EMR (electronic medical record) reflected a Focus area stating, I am at risk for falls related to unsteady gait, history of falls, muscle weakness, cognitive impairment, medication side effects, poor vision, or incontinence. Date Initiated: 08/08/2025. The related Interventions/Tasks area reflected, I will be assisted with walking, transfers, or toileting as needed, based on my current ability. Date Initiated: 08/08/2025. Review of Resident #5's Paper Care Plan reflected a Problem area stating, Problem Start Date: 09/12/2024, Category: ADLs Functional Status/Rehabilitation Potential [Resident #5's] ability to ___ (ADL: e.g., transfer, walk in room, walk in corridor, dress, eat, toilet, maintain personal hygiene) has deteriorated R/T advanced age. Edited: 05/29/2025 Edited By: [ADON]. The related Goal area reflected, Long Term Goal Target Date: 08/29/2025 Resident will not further deteriorate in ADL Edited: 05/29/2025 Edited By: [ADON]. The related Approach area reflected, Approach Start Date: 05/29/2025 Follow PT/OT/ST recommendations. Edited: 05/29/2025 Edited By: [ADON] and Approach Start Date: 05/29/2025 Provide assistance for ADL's as indicated Edited: 05/29/2025 Edited By: [ADON]. Observation of two-person transfer of Resident #5 on 08/13/2025 at 03:17 PM with OT G, CNA A, and CNA B revealed Resident #5 sitting in recliner in her room. OTA G had two gait belts in hand. She stated that she would leave the gait belts with the aides and exit the room for the transfer. CNA A and CNA B raised the recliner chair and placed the wheelchair next to the recliner. Both aides stood in front of the resident and each attempted to apply the gait belt to Resident #5. Neither CNA A or CNA B could properly apply the gait belt. CNA A stated, I am going to be honest, I usually do it without a gait belt. It has been a minute since I used a gait belt. We usually do it with two people, one on each side, without a gait belt. Resident #5 requested twice for CNA B to move the belt below her breasts because it was painful. CNA B moved the gait belt slightly lower and continued to try to secure the belt properly. After 15 minutes, Resident #5 declined to continue with the transfer. Resident #5 stated she was tired. CNA B stated, I will go down to therapy and let them train me. In an interview with OT G on 8/13/2025 at 03:37PM, she stated that the facility asked her to train the two CNA's prior to the transfer with Resident #5, but there was not time for her to do it before the surveyor arrived to observe the transfer. She stated that she was a PRN (as needed/temporary) therapist for the facility. She stated that she started on 08/01/2025 when the new company took ownership. She stated that the new ownership no longer contracted with the previous rehabilitation company used by the facility. She stated that at other facilities it was her experience that staff would be trained on transfers when they were hired at the facility. She stated there was no therapy director or physical therapist at the facility currently. 3. Review of Resident #23's Facesheet dated 8/15/2025 reflected an [AGE] year-old, female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included dementia, muscle wasting atrophy right and left shoulder (muscles shrinking and becoming weaker), myocardial infarction (lapse of blood flow to the heart), abnormalities of gait and mobility, abnormalities of gait (abnormal way of walking), and history of falling. Review of Resident #23's Annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected a BIMS score of 14 (no cognitive impairment). In Section GG - Functional Abilities, the coding reflected the resident requires, Supervision or touching assistance with all transfer types, indicating staff assisting the resident would provide verbal cues and/or touching/steadying and/or contact guard assistance as needed as the resident completes activity. Review of Resident #23's Orders dated 8/15/2025 reflected no orders related to mobility assistance required or any assistive devices required for transfers. Review of Resident #23's Paper Care Plan reflected a Problem area stating, Problem Start Date: 11/08/2023 Category: Falls [Resident #23] is at risk for falling R/T [] immobility,[X] muscle weakness, [] Diabetes, [X] COPD,[X] chronic pain, [X] anemia, [] dizziness, [X]vision problems, [] hearing problems,[X]incontinence , [X] neuropathy, []dehydration, [] decreased cognition. 6-5-2025- Resident had a fall while attempting to stand without assistance. 6-8-2025 Fall while at son's home while attempting to toilet self. Edited: 06/10/2025 Edited By: [ADON]. In the related Goal area it stated, Short Term Goal Date: 09/04/2025 [Resident #23] will remain free from injury. Edited: 06/04/2025 Edited By:[ADON]. In the related Approach area it stated, Approach Start Date: 06/06/2025 Assist resident with standing Created: 06/06/2025 Created By: [ADON]. Review of Patient/Resident Incident/Accident Investigation Worksheet reflected a fall without injury for Resident #23 on 06/05/2025 at 11:15AM. In the Describe Exactly What Happened field, it stated, The patient was attempting to stand up for wkly (weekly) skin assessment, lost her balance and was eased down to the floor. No bruising or injuries noted or reported. The statement is signed by RN. In the section for Follow up/steps taken to prevent reoccurrence and person(s) responsible: it stated, Patient can only stand with assistance. Administrative staff signature is illegible. The signature is dated 6/06/2025. Review of Fall Investigation Worksheet for fall on 6/05/2025 for Resident #23 reflected RN as the only witness to the fall. The statement of witness reflected, The patient verbalized she could stand with my assistance for me to complete her wkly skin assessment. She began losing her balance and was eased to the floor by this nurse. For Neuromuscular/Functional section of the form, it indicated Resident #23 has lower extremity weakness. The recommendations field stated, The patient should not attempt to stand up for skin assessment. She can be assessed better in bed. The form was filled out by RN. 4. Review of Resident #3's Face sheet dated 8/14/2025 reflected a [AGE] year-old, female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included dementia, contracture (shortening of muscles, tendons, skin, and nearby soft tissues that causes the joints to shorten and become very stiff) of muscle in lower leg and upper arm, muscle weakness, and pain.Review of Resident #3's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] reflected that resident was rarely or never understood and BIMS assessment was not able to be conducted to assess cognition. Section GG for Functional Abilities indicated Resident #3 had impairment to both legs, she was totally dependent on staff for all self-care and transfer types, and she is unable to use a wheelchair, walker, or cane. Review of Resident #3's Paper Care Plan reflected a Problem area stating, Problem Start Date: 06/26/2024 [Resident #23's] ability to (ADL: e.g., transfer, walk in room, walk in corridor, dress, eat, toilet, maintain personal hygiene) has deteriorated R/T Hospice End of Live Care Edited: 06/02/2025 Edited By: [ADON]. The related Approach area stated, Approach Start Date: 06/02/2025 Provide assistance for all ADL's. Edited: 06/02/2025 Edited By: [ADON], Approach Start Date: 06/02/2025 She uses Geri Chair for positioning Edited: 06/02/2025 Edited By: [ADON], Approach Start Date: 06/02/2025 Transfer extensive assist 1-2 Edited: 06/02/2025 Edited By: [ADON] Review of Resident #3's Orders on 8/15/2025 reflected an order dated 08/14/2025 for, [Mechanical Lift] Transfer due to non-weight bearing status. There are no other orders listed indicating Resident #3's related to mobility status or transfer equipment prior to 8/14/2025. The last weight for Resident #3 visible on the order screen reflected a weight of 102.2 lbs on 8/04/2025. Review of Resident #3's Occupational Therapy Evaluation and Plan of Treatment dated for Start of Care on 1/06/2025 and signed by OT F, reflected a Behaviors section indicating, Patient Behaviors: Confused, yet participative. Range of motion to both arms and legs are listed as impaired. Standing ability and sitting ability are listed as, unable. The documents do not indicate any necessary transfer devices or the number of staff required for transfers. It does not describe an appropriate transfer technique for the resident in the notes. Review of Resident #3's Physical Therapy Evaluation and Plan of Treatment dated for Start of Care on 1/6/2025 and signed by PT H, reflected the range of motion to both arms and legs are listed as impaired. Standing ability and sitting ability are listed as, unable. For the section labelled Transfers, it stated Patient requires assistance, however, will not currently address in treatment plan. In an interview with LVN C on 8/14/2025 at 5:50AM, she stated that there were two aides in the building. She stated that the aides present were both She stated that Resident #3 was a two person transfer but was already up in the Geri-chair for the day. She stated she would inform staff that surveyor wanted to observe two-person transfer. Observation of Resident #3 on 08/14/2025 at 6:00AM reflected Resident #3 lying in Geri-chair, eyes closed, well-groomed with blanket placed over her up to her lower chest. In a follow-up interview with LVN C on 08/14/2025 at 6:10AM, she stated that she transfers Resident #3 required two staff. She stated the resident is not classified as needing a mechanical lift. She stated that when she transfers Resident #3, one person stands in front of the resident and one person is behind the resident. She stated the resident is non-weight-bearing. She stated the person behind the resident would normally hold the chair steady during the transfer. She stated the resident is smaller in size, so the person not holding the chair will raise the head of the bed to sit her up, they would then place their arms under the resident's arms and lift her from the bed over to the chair. She stated the second person doesn't usually touch the resident. She stated that they do not use a gait belt with the transfer for Resident #3. She stated that for a bigger resident, one person would be on each side of the resident. She stated the staff would each then place one of their arms under the resident's arm, then assist them to either stand at the bedside or perform an assisted pivot transfer to a wheelchair. She stated she worked at the facility full-time since September or October of 2024. She stated that there was a gait belt in the breakroom now. She stated that it was not safe for staff to transfer a resident by carrying them under their arms. She stated they did it because of Resident #3's size. She stated Resident #3 was not classified as a mechanical lift transfer. She stated she knew of one resident who needed a gait belt and stated that the resident was able to stand on her own. She stated that she has not seen staff use a gait belt recently. She could not recall a specific date or time she last saw staff use a gait belt. She stated, I'm not there in the room to see the transfers usually. She stated that she usually has two CNA‘s on night shift with her. She stated there was an aide assigned to the secure unit and the second aide was helping with the rest of the residents not on the secure unit. She stated that both aides working with her that night were agency staff. She stated that when the aides are ready to transfer the two person assists and residents requiring mechanical lifts in the mornings, she will usually watch the secure unit while the aides work together to assist with residents care. She stated that she sometimes helps with ADL care. She stated that not using proper transfer equipment can result in a fall and injuries. She stated that gait belt use was a fundamental skill for a CNA. She stated that improper use of a gait belt can cause injuries depending on the placement, including skin tears. LVN C demonstrated proper use of a gate belt. In an interview with CNA E on 08/14/2025 at 6:27AM, she stated that she was employed by an agency to work shifts at the facility. She stated that she picks up shifts at the facility when she can because it is closer to her home. She stated that they do not get people up overnight usually and she was familiar with three residents that were two person transfers. She stated that Resident #3 and Resident #5 were two-person transfers. She stated Resident #3 did not require a mechanical lift. She stated that she is not heavy, but she does require two people to lift her to the chair. She stated that each staff member stands on either side of the resident and puts their arms under one side of the resident's arms and they lift the resident together to the Geri-chair. She stated that they do not use any transfer devices or equipment for the transfer for Resident #3. She stated that Resident #3 cannot assist with standing. She stated that people who cannot stand at all during the transfer usually use a mechanical lift. She stated that she does not know the residents well. She stated that she does not check the care plans or the chart to find out the transfer status of a resident. She stated that she usually asks the facility CNA's or the charge nurse how to transfer a resident. She stated they always have regular staff or a nurse available on the shift. She denied receiving any transfer training from the facility prior to starting there. She stated that she has never been trained to do a two person transfer where she was told to lift a resident who cannot stand from under their shoulder without any transfer equipment. She stated it was not safe to lift a resident for a transfer. She stated that transferring a resident without a gait belt by lifting them under their arms was something she learned to do at work. She stated that she never lifts a resident who cannot stand on their own by herself. She stated that the potential impact to the resident was that it could, hurt her. She stated that Resident #3 is, real fragile. She stated, It is a bad habit. She stated she was knowledgeable about how to use a gait belt. She stated, I only use it when they are able to stand some on their own. She stated that in other facilities gait belts are usually in the resident's rooms in the nightstand or in a basket at the bedside. She stated she believed they would be in the same place in this facility. CNA E was able to demonstrate proper application of a gait belt. She was unable to locate a gait belt in the room for Resident #5. Resident stated that she did not believe there was a belt like that in her room. She stated that gait belt use was a fundamental skill for a CNA. She stated that with improper use of a gait belt, a resident could be hurt or sustain a rib fracture if it was too tight and if it was too loose, the gait belt could hurt a resident under their arms and cause shearing to their skin or be useless in assisting with the transfer. She was unable to recall other staff members using a gait belt with a resident in the facility. She stated, I don't think anyone uses a gait belt for transfers here. In an interview with ADON on 8/14/2025 at 7:07AM, she stated that Resident #5 was a two-person transfer. She stated that Resident #3 was a 1-2-person transfer. She stated that Resident #3 was full weight bearing status to her knowledge. She stated that the last physical therapy discharge note did not state the weight bearing status of Resident #3 or transfer requirements. She stated that there is a note from occupational therapy assessment dated [DATE] to 2/06/2025 stating Resident #3 is unable to stand. The notes state that she requires assistance with transfers but does not indicate how the transfer should be performed. She stated that she would provide the most recent therapy notes from the previous rehabilitation company the facility contracted with. She stated that the care plans should be pretty accurate regarding transfer status. She denied knowledge of any falls with transfers. In an interview with Resident #18 on 8/14/2025 at 6:50AM, he stated that he transfers with a mechanical lift. He stated that he has not had any problems that he can recall. He stated that the staff usually only use one person for the lift transfer. He stated he believed he only needed one person to perform the transfer. In an interview with CNA E on 8/14/2025 at 07:06AM, she stated that a mechanical lift transfer should only be performed with two staff. She stated that Resident #18 was a mechanical lift transfer. She stated that she has never performed a mechanical lift transfer on her own. In a follow up interview with Resident #18 on 8/14/2025 at 8:36AM, he stated that he did recall an incident in early June 2025 where he received a skin tear during a mechanical lift transfer. He stated that he did not remember how many people were operating the mechanical lift during the transfer. In an interview with CNA A on 8/14/2025 at 8:45AM, she stated she had worked at the facility for 14 years. She stated that she did recall the mechanical lift transfer with skin tear incident on 6/04/2025 for Resident #18. She stated that she got him dressed, put the mechanical lift blanket under him, and got him up in the lift. She stated, I was pulling him back in the chair when my nails scraped his elbow. She stated there were no other witnesses to the event. She stated that she performed the mechanical lift transfer with Resident #18 on 6/4/25 by herself. She stated that she should have used two people for the transfer. She stated that she knew that she needed two people. She stated that she could not find the other CNA on staff that day. She stated that she should have asked the nurse to help her and she did not. She stated that she was not trained by facility on mechanical lifts. She stated that the potential risk to patient with a one-person mechanical lift transfer is that a resident could fall out of the lift. She stated that for a normal two-person transfer, she would ensure privacy for the resident. She stated she would normally sit the bed up to help if the resident needed assistance sitting. She stated they did not do that the day before. She stated it was because she was nervous. She stated that she would normally assist a resident to sit if they needed it. She stated she didn't know anyone in the building who needed a gate belt. She stated the gate belt use and transfer skills were an important skill for a CNA to have. She stated the transfers without the proper equipment can put the resident at risk of hurting themselves.In an interview with CNA B on 08/14/2025 at 9:28 AM, she said she worked at the facility for about a month. She stated she had no transfer training or gate belt training on hire. She stated that for a normal two-person transfer, staff stand on either side of the patient. She stated one person near the shoulder. She stated one person should stand near the resident's legs. Then they swing the resident together to set their shoulders up and their feet down and in a sitting position. She stated that if they are unable to sit up on their own, she would assist them. She stated each person would then stand on one side of the resident. She stated the staff would put one of their arms under the resident's arm on each side, and staff would use the other hand to hold onto the resident's pants to assist them to a standing position and either pivot to the destination or walk a few steps and sit down. She stated that she has not used a gait belt on anyone in the facility. She stated she does not know of any residents that need a gait belt in the facility. She stated it's been about four months since she used a gait belt. She stated that she was not able to apply the gait belt on Resident #5 on 8/13/2025 during the observation. She stated that knowledge of how to use a gait belt and perform transfers was an important skill for CNA. She stated that she asks the nurses to know what the ability level and transfer status of the residents in the facility. She stated she does sometimes checks the care plans to find out information about resident information and transfers. She stated that CNA A has worked at the facility for a long time and she asked her how to do the transfers for the residents. She stated she would ask the nurse to find out who needs a gait belt after the interview. She stated that improper transfers can cause a fall. She stated that improper use of a gait belt can cause a fall. She stated that the resident can also be injured by improper positioning of a gait belt. She stated that she was trained by the occupational therapist on 8/13/2025. In a follow up interview with OT G on 08/14/2025 at 11:40AM, she stated that she was not sure how many residents were 1 person, 2 person, or mechanical lift transfers in the facility. She stated that she had never seen a list of residents who required gait belts for transfers. She stated that anyone who is not independent or using a mechanical lift for transfers, should have a gait belt on during transfers. She stated that she would use a mechanical lift to transfer a resident who is unable to bear weight on their legs. She stated that Resident #3 is non-weight bearing. She stated that she just met Resident #3 on the morning of 8/14/2025. She would use a mechanical lift to transfer her. She stated that she would not recommend a one person transfer for Resident #3. She stated that she would never lift a resident from under their arms to perform a transfer. She stated that transfer recommendations from therapy staff should be in a therapy evaluation or in the care plan. She stated sometimes care plan updates do not happen immediately after a change. She stated that lifting a resident for a transfer from under their shoulders could result in a shoulder injury. She stated that improper transfers can also result in shearing injuries or falls. She stated that she was not sure how long Resident #3 had been unable to bear weight. She stated she would check the records. She stated staff should never use a mechanical lift with one person only. She stated that the potential risk to resident is injury. She stated her role was to evaluate and assess patients for their occupational performance, functional mobility, and ADL performance. In an interview with RNC on 8/14/2025 at 12:04PM, she stated that she started in the building as the acting Director of Nursing on 8/04/2025. She stated that the new company took over the building on 08/01/2025. She stated that the new Director of Nursing started on 8/11/2025, but she had not been through the training for the position and would not be familiar with the residents or corporate policies at that time. She stated her role was as Clinical Support when the Director of Nursing assumes her role in the facility. She stated that anytime staff transfer a resident they should use a gait belt. She stated she asked the ADMIN to order 30 gait belts on 08/13/2025 when staff were unable to find a gait belt outside of the two utilized by the therapy team. She stated that staff should not have to provide that. She stated that the facility should provide gait belts for residents that need them. She stated it would have been the responsibility of the previous Director of Nursing to ensure that gait belts were available. She stated that in the absence of a DON, the ADON would be responsible for gait belts. She stated she did not have time to do a mock survey or evaluate that part of the facility prior to survey entrance. She stated that staff would not use a gait belt if a resident refused the gait belt, if they were a mechanical lift transfer, or if they transferred independently. She stated that transfers without a gait belt, when one is indicated, put residents at risk for skin tears, bruising, and falls. She stated that improper use of a gait belt can cause injury to a resident. She stated it was a fundamental skill for a CNA to be able to use a gait belt for transfers. She stated she started a competency packet with transfers for the facility staff when she realized there was a problem. She stated that staff should never transfer a resident in a mechanical lift with one person. She stated that the risk to the residents of only having one staff member perform a mechanical lift transfer is injury. She stated that she was not aware of any incidents of staff using a mechanical lift with one person. She stated that she would work with therapy to start trainings for mechanical lift proficiencies with the direct care staff. She stated that for a normal two person transfer without a mechanical lift, staff would raise the head of the bed slightly, and each staff member would support either the shoulders or the legs, as assist the resident to sit. She stated that staff would then apply a gait belt, allow the resident to sit at the bedside for a moment, and ensure that the wheelchair is locked. She stated that staff would then stand to the right and left of the resident and use the gait belt and assist the resident to stand. She stated that she requested OT G to evaluate the transfers of several of the residents. She stated that staff should never lift a resident from under their arms during transfers. She stated that if a resident is non-weight bearing, they should automatically be listed as a mechanical lift transfer for the safety of the resident and the staff. She stated that movement from a partial to moderate assist to a mechanical lift transfer would indicate a decline in status. She stated that it was the responsibility of the facility to improve the status of the residents, but some situations cannot be helped. In an interview with ADON on 8/14/2025 at 2:59PM, she stated that she started at the facility in December of 2025 as MDS Coordinator/ADON. She stated that when the previous DON of the facility left in December, she had been on call for all nursing related concerns or reportables. She stated that she worked on the investigation involving Resident #18 on 6/04/2025. She stated that when she interviewed Resident #18 he stated that the fabric of the sling pulled on his skin causing the skin tear. She stated that staff should always use two people for mechanical lift transfers. She stated that the risk to the resident of only using one staff for a mechanical lift transfer is injury. She stated, You just don't do it without two people. She stated that she was not aware that there was only one person in the mechanical lift transfer on 6/04/2025. She stated that she did not know if she assumed that there were two people present for the transfer or if she [TRUNCA
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for one of one kitchen revi...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for one of one kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation. 1. The facility failed to ensure Dietary Aide K wear a beard guard when standing over clean dishes in the dishwashing room on 08/12/2025. 2. The facility failed to ensure Dietary [NAME] M used proper hand hygiene during food preparation on 08/13/2025. These failures could place residents who ate food from the kitchen at risk for foodborne illness.Findings included: 1.Observation on 04/22/2025 at 9:10 AM, Dietary Aide K was not wearing a beard guard when standing in the dishwasher room over clean dishes. His beard growth was approximately 8 inches. Interview on 08/12/2025 at 9:15 AM, Dietary Aide K stated he was expected to wear a beard guard anytime he was in the kitchen area. He stated if hair fell onto plates and the hair transferred to residents' food there was a possibility a resident may become ill with some type of stomach issues (when asked what type of stomach issues he did not respond to the question). He stated germs was located on hair. Dietary Aide K stated he had been in-service on wearing beard guards. He stated it was in February 2025 or March 2025. He did not recall the exact date. 2. Observation on 08/13/25 at 7:25 AM, Dietary [NAME] L was wearing gloves when preparing puree food. She touched the right side of her shirt with her right hand. Dietary [NAME] L touched the bacon without changing her gloves. She picked up the bacon with her right hand and placed the bacon on a baking pan. Interview on 08/13/25 at 12:50 PM, Dietary [NAME] L stated she did not change her gloves after she touched her clothes. She stated she did touch pick up the bacon and place it on pan with her right hand. Dietary [NAME] L stated she did contaminate the bacon. She stated if a resident ate contaminated food there was a possibility the resident may become ill with stomach issues such as vomiting, diarrhea and nausea. She stated she had been in-service on hand hygiene and to change gloves anytime you touch anything contaminated. She stated her clothes would be considered contaminated. She stated she had been in-service on hand hygiene but did not remember the date of the in-service. Interview on 08/14/25 at 8:30 AM Dietary Manager stated hair nets or cap and beard guard on facial hair was present are required for all staff while in the kitchen. Dietary Manager stated it could negatively affect a resident if hair restraints are not worn by a resident receiving food with hair in it. Dietary Manager stated it was her responsibility to ensure beard restraints were worn by the male staff in the kitchen. Dietary Manager did not answer why dietary aide did not properly wear a beard guard while in the kitchen even though he had facial hair. She stated all staff was to wash hands after touching anything no Interview on 08/14/25 at 12:30 PM the Administrator stated his expectation was that beard restraints were to be worn by all staff in the kitchen. The Administrator stated if beard restraints are not worn there was a possibility a hair may fall into food. He stated there was a possibility if a resident ingested a hair the resident may become ill with some type of stomach issues. The Administrator stated he expected gloves to be changed, hands washed anytime staff touch contaminated items. He stated clothes would be considered contaminated. He stated there was a possibility if there was a hair or bacteria in food, a resident may develop a food borne illness. The Administrator stated the Dietary Manger was responsible for all protocols in the kitchen and he was responsible to monitor the Dietary Manager. Record review of the facility's Policy on Dietary Employee Personal Hygiene, not dated, reflected It is the policy of this facility to utilize the following as guidelines for employee personal hygiene to prevent contamination of food by foodservice employees. Gloves are to be worn and changed appropriately to reduce the spread of infection. All dietary staff must wear hair restraints (hairnet, hat and/or beard restraint) to prevent hair from contacting food.
Apr 2025 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Transfer Notice (Tag F0623)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident's Ombudsman of the transfer or discharge and t...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident's Ombudsman of the transfer or discharge and the reasons for the move in writing and in a language and manner they understood for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for Discharge Rights. The facility failed to notify Resident #1's Ombudsman in writing of the transfer/discharge of the resident to a behavioral hospital, the reason for the transfer/discharge, and the right to appeal. This failure could affect the residents at the facility by placing them at risk of being discharged and not having access to available advocacy services, discharge/transfer options, and appeal processes. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's undated Face Sheet reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female with an initial admission date of 08/06/2024. Resident #1 was discharged to a behavioral hospital on [DATE] with a warrant for emergency detention. Resident #1's diagnoses was Unspecified Dementia, (mental decline without a specific underlying diagnosis) unspecified severity, with psychosis disturbance (group of mental health disturbances characterized by a loss of touch with reality, leading to abnormal thoughts, perceptions and behaviors), Major Depressive Disorder (serious mental health disorder characterized by persistent feelings of sadness, hopelessness, and loss of interest or pleasure in activities), and Generalized Anxiety Disorder (severe ongoing anxiety that interferes with daily activities). Review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected she had a BIMS score of 5 indicating severe cognitive impairment. Review of an Application for Emergency Apprehension and Detention dated 01/25/2025 and signed by the ADM reflected Resident #1 has been having very poor and combative behavior. She has been disturbing the peace of the community in the nursing facility. Review of a Notice of Discharge or Transfer dated 02/24/2025 for Resident #1 and e-mailed to her Guardian on 02/24/2025 reflected she was being discharged from the facility. The document did not include the correct name of the Ombudsman and no address was provided. Review of the Warrant for Emergency Detention for Resident #1 dated 3/25/2025 reflected there was reasonable cause to believe that the person evidences mental illness; that the person evidences substantial risk of serious harm to the person or others; that the risk of harm is imminent unless the person is immediately restrained; and that necessary restraint cannot be accomplished without emergency detention. In a telephone interview on 04/01/2025 at 10:53 AM, the Ombudsman stated she did not receive a copy of the discharge notification for Resident #1 of the facility's intent to discharge. In an interview on 04/02/2025 at 11:53 AM, the ADM stated I didn't send a written notice to the Ombudsman of the discharge for Resident #1. I sent one to the guardian. I should have sent a written notice to the Ombudsman, but I tried to reach her by phone twice. In an interview on 04/02/2025 at 12:37 PM, the DON stated the facility follows CMS policy, and it was a learning process. She provided a copy of the admission, transfer and discharge rights that she said the facility was supposed to follow. She stated she had started a training for employees. Review of a document dated 3/31/2025 and provided by the DON on 04/02/2025 revealed Title 42-Public Health, Chapter IV- Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Department of Health and Human Services, Subchapter G- Standards and Certifications, part 483- requirements for States and Long-Term care Facilities. Transfer and Discharge- Facility requirements- (3) Notice before transfer. Before a facility transfers or discharges a resident, the facility must (1) Notify the resident and the resident's representative of the transfer or discharge and the reasons for the move in writing and in a language and manner they understand. The facility must send a copy of the notice to a representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman. No documentation was provided by the ADM at the time of exit from the facility of a written notice of discharge to Resident #1's Ombudsman.
Jun 2024 9 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents unable to conduct activities of daily...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents unable to conduct activities of daily living (ADLs) received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for two of six residents (Resident # 15 and Resident #18). 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident # 15's nails were cleaned and did not have any rough edges. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident # 18's facial hair was removed and nails were cleaned. These failures could place residents at risk for poor hygiene, dignity issues, and decreased quality of life. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #15's Face Sheet dated, 06/27/2024, reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of rheumatoid arthritis unspecified site (a chronic inflammatory disorder that can affect more than just your joints), unspecified lack of coordination ( uncoordinated movement is due to a muscle control problem that causes an inability to coordinate movements), age- related physical debility ( generalized weakness, exhaustion, poor balance, and decreased physical activity), muscle weakness ( lack of muscle strength), and chronic pain syndrome ( long standing pain that persists beyond the usual recovery period or occurs along with a chronic health condition, such as arthritis. It may affect people to the point that they can't work, eat properly, and/ or take part in physical activity). Record review of Resident #15's Annual MDS Assessment, dated 05/02/2024, reflected the resident had a BIMS score of 12 reflected his cognition was moderately impaired. Resident # 15 did not reject care. Resident #18 was assessed to require assistance with personal hygiene, toileting, dressing, bathing, and transfers. Resident #15 had diagnosis of arthritis (joint inflammation) and muscle weakness (lack of muscle strength). Record review of Resident #15's Comprehensive Care Plan, dated 05/15/2024, reflected Resident #15 preferred bed baths. Intervention: Staff will offer shower/ bed bath three times weekly. Staff will educate Resident #15 about proper hygiene. Resident #15 had rheumatoid arthritis and was at risk for decreased in ADLs and increased joint pain. Intervention: monitor for increased joint pain- give meds/ treatment per order - assess for signs of relief of pain. Resident #15 required assistance with ADLs. Interventions: Resident #15 required assistance with bathing, dressing, toileting, transfers, and eating. Record review of Resident #15's Treatment Administration Record (TAR) dated 06/01/2024 - 06/31/2024 reflected Resident #15 did not refuse nail care. Record review of Resident #15's nurses notes from 05/01/2024 thru 06/26/2024 Resident #15 did not refuse nail care. Observation on 06/25/2024 at 10:21 AM Resident # 15 was in his room sitting in wheelchair watching television. Resident #15 had blackish hard substance underneath the forefinger and middle fingernails on his right hand. His middle and ring fingernails was rough around the edges. There was an odor of bowels on his right hand. In an interview on 06/25/2024 at 10: 24 AM Resident #15 stated he tried to clean his nails but he was not physically able to clean his own nails or trim his nails. He stated some of his nails was rough and needed to be smoothed but he was not able to do this and he would try but he was afraid he would get his nails infected if he tried. Resident #15 also stated he needed assistance with his nails and all his care. He stated someone came in yesterday (06/24/2024) to trim his nails and they said his nails did not need to be trimmed. He asked the staff to file his nails and the staff stated they did not file nails all they did was trim nails. He stated his nails were dirty yesterday afternoon after the staff left the room. He stated the person never returned to his room and he did not ask anyone else to assist him. He stated if she stated it was not their job to file the nails he was not going to ask anyone else. Resident #15 did not recall the person's name. Resident #15 stated he has not refused any nail care from staff. 2. Record review of Resident #18's Face Sheet dated, 06/26/2024, reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of unspecified dementia (affects memory, thinking and social abilities), contracture of muscles, unspecified upper arm (occurs when your muscles, tendons, joints, or other tissues or shorten causing a deformity and can cause loss of movement in the joint), muscle weakness (lack of muscle strength). Record review of Resident #18's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 04/01/2024, reflected the resident had a BIMS score of 0 indicated her cognition was severely impaired. Resident #18 did not reject care. She was assessed to be dependent on staff for ADLs such as: eating, oral hygiene, toileting hygiene, personal hygiene, showers, lower body dressing and all transfers except sit to lying and lying to sitting on side of bed. Record review of Resident #18's Comprehensive Care Plan, dated 03/07/2024, reflected Resident #18 had a diagnosis of dementia (affects memory, thinking and social abilities) with expected decline in cognitive impairment over a period of time as a natural progression of the disease. Intervention: document decline in cognitive status. Resident #18 was identified needed assistance with ADLs (the type of ADLs was not specified). Record review of Resident #18's Treatment Administration Record (TAR) dated 06/01/2024 - 06/31/2024 reflected Resident #18 did not refuse nail care. Record review of Resident #18's nurses notes from 05/01/2024 thru 06/26/2024 Resident #18 did not refuse nail care. Observation on 06/25/2024 at 10:36 AM Resident #18 was sitting in her Geri chair listening to music. She had slightly curled facial hair approximately 2-3 inches long on the left side of her face near her mouth. Resident #18 had blackish hard substance underneath her nails on her middle and ring finger on the right hand. She also had hard blackish and her ring and fore finger on her left hand. In an interview on 06/25/2024 at 10:39 AM Resident #18 was not interview able. She did not respond verbally or with gestures to any questions. In an interview on 06/27/2024 at 11:00 AM the DON stated it was a joint effort between the CNAs and the nurses to complete nail care on the residents. She stated the nurses was responsible for residents with diagnosis of diabetes ( a disease in which the body's ability to produce or respond to the hormone insulin was impaired). The Director of Nurses stated nail care was scheduled by the TAR and when residents received showers. She also stated nail care was also expected to be completed as needed. She stated if a resident had blackish substance underneath their nails the substance may be dirt and not bacteria. She stated no one knows if it was bacteria underneath the residents' fingernails. The DON stated if the scent was feces was noticed underneath residents' fingernails there was a potential this may be bacteria. She stated it was a possibility a resident may become physically ill such as vomiting or diarrhea if they ingested bacteria from feces. She also stated if a resident had rough fingernails there was a possibility the resident may scratch themselves and develop a skin tear. The DON stated she did not believe women having facial hair was a dignity issue or any type of issue. She stated if a resident was not able to communicate verbally if they wanted facial hair she did not believe this was an issue for the female resident to have facial hair. She stated if there was any refusal of nail care it would be documented in the nurses notes or on the TAR. In an interview on 06/27/2024 at 11:20 AM LVN A stated the nurses and CNAs were responsible for nail care. She stated the nurses was responsible to trim and clean all resident's nails with a diagnosis of diabetes. LVN A stated it was the CNAs responsibility to clean and trim all other residents' nails. She stated the nurses checked the diabetic nails weekly and the CNAs reported to the nurses if any diabetic nails needed to be cleaned or trimmed. LVN also stated the nurse would document on the TAR (Treatment Administrator Record) and/ or nurses notes if any resident refused nail care. She stated if there was a blackish substance underneath the residents' nails, there was a possibility the substance may had bacteria underneath the residents' nails. She also stated if a resident swallowed the bacteria there was a possibility a resident may become extremely ill with stomach issues such as diarrhea. She stated if a resident scratched themselves with rough nails there was a potential a resident may develop a skin tear. LVN A stated she was not aware of anyone refusing nail care; however, she would need to refer to the TAR to know for certain if Resident # 15 or Resident #18 refused nail care. In an interview on 06/27/2024 at 11:30 AM CNA E stated the nurses completed all diabetic fingernails and the CNAs was responsible for all other residents' nails. She stated the CNAs was responsible to complete nail care such as trimming, filing, and cleaning the nails. She stated the staff was very busy and it was difficult to complete nail care on residents except when the resident was in the shower. CNA E also stated if a resident's nails needed to be cleaned, trimmed, or filed and it was not their shower day there were times the staff was not able to clean, trim or file the residents' nails. CNA E stated there were also times the nursing staff may have time to do one of the nail tasks but not all three tasks such as filing, cleaning, and trimming. She stated if a resident had blackish substance underneath their nails it was usually from their bowels. She stated if a resident swallowed some of their bowels the resident may become ill with sores in their mouth, yeast infections in their mouth, get E. coli (a bacteria that is commonly found in the lower intestine of warm-blooded organisms) and may develop major stomach problems such as diarrhea. She stated she worked with Resident #15 and Resident #18 and she was not aware of them refusing nail care. She stated if a resident's nails were rough there was a possibility the resident may scratch themselves and develop a skin tear or possibly scratch their eye and cause a tear on their eyeball. Record review of the Facility Policy on ADLs dated, 05/05/2023, reflected Activities of daily living (ADLs), refer to tasks related to personal care including, grooming, dressing, oral hygiene, transfer, bed mobility, eating, bathing and communication system. POLICY: The Facility provides care and services to ensure that a resident's abilities in activities of daily living do not diminish unless circumstances of the individual's clinical condition demonstrate that such diminution was unavoidable. The Facility provides necessary care to all residents that are unable to carry out activities of daily living on their own to ensure they maintain proper nutrition, grooming, and hygiene. *
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision a...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for one of five residents reviewed for accidents and hazards. (Resident #1). The facility failed to ensure CNA E followed Resident #1's care plan for the use of a mechanical lift for all transfers with two staff assist and failed to follow the manufacture instructions for use which resulted in Resident #1 receiving an improper and potentially dangers transfer. These failures placed residents at risk of injuries, hospitalization, or diminished quality of care. Finding Include: Review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 06/26/2024 reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with the following diagnoses Cerebral palsy (A group of disorders that affect movement, muscle tone, balance, and posture.), Anxiety Disorder (Fear characterized by behavioral disturbances.), Abnormal posture, and Contractures (A permanent tightening of the muscles, tendons, skin, and surrounding tissues that causes the joints to shorten and stiffen and a decrease in ROM). Review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected Resident #1 was assessed to have a BIMS score of 15 indicating she was cognitively intact. Resident #1 was further assessed to have functional limitation in range of motion in her bilateral upper and lower extremities. Resident #1 was further assessed to be dependent on staff for transfers. Review of Resident #1's comprehensive care plan reflected a problem dated 04/21/2021 that was revised on 04/15/2024 Resident #1 requires assistance with ADLs related to impaired cognition, impaired mobility and incontinence of bowel and bladder related to cerebral palsy. Approaches included: Transfers total assist with 2 person assist utilizing a Hoyer lift. Review of Resident #1's consolidated physician orders reflected an order dated 01/09/2019 Transfer with assist of Hoyer lift. Observation on 06/26/2024 at 1:26 PM revealed CNA E outside of Resident #1's room preparing to provide care. CNA E went to get the Hoyer lift. CNA E entered Resident #1's room alone with the Hoyer lift. Resident #1 was sitting in a specialized wheelchair and was observed to have contractures (a permanent tightening of the muscles, tendons, skin and surrounding tissues that causes the joints to shorten and stiffen) to her neck, spine, bilateral arms, and legs. Resident #1 had abnormal posture and was leaning to her right side. CNA E She positioned the mechanical lift around Resident #1's wheelchair and hooked the sling to the Hoyer lift. Without locking the wheels on the mechanical lift, she lifted Resident #1 and maneuvered the mechanical lift to the bed. CNA E then closed the legs locked the mechanical and lowered Resident #1 to the bed. In an interview on 06/26/2024 at 1:45 PM CNA E stated she was trained to use two people for mechanical lift transfers. CNA E stated she performed the transfer alone because she thought the other aide was coming to help and when she did not come; she went ahead with the transfer. CNA E stated she should have waited on the other aide for safety reasons CNA E further stated the wheels on the mechanical lift were supposed to be locked when lifting the resident. In an interview on 06/26/2024 at 1:53 PM the DON stated it was her expectation for two people be present for mechanical lift transfers for safety reasons. In an interview on 06/26/2024 at 3:27 PM Resident #1 stated the staff usually used two people to transfer her with the Hoyer but sometimes they only use one. Resident #1 stated she had not been injured during any transfers and felt safe. Review of the facility's policy Mechanical Lifts: General Guidelines dated 05/05/2023 reflected Prepare the environment by 1) Securing the appropriate number of caregivers. In most cases, a minimum of 2 people is required to operate the lift and handle the patient or resident . Review of the Hoyer lift manufacturer instruction manual dated 2024 reflected .Safety Precautions . ALWAYS lock the wheels when lifting .
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0757 (Tag F0757)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure, based on the comprehensive assessment of a r...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure, based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident, residents who had not used psychotropic drugs were not given these drugs unless the medication was necessary to treat a specific condition as diagnosed and documented in the clinical record for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #21) reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility failed to ensure Resident #21 had behavior and side effect monitoring for his prescribed antidepressant medications Fluoxetine and Trazadone and his antipsychotic medication Abilify. These failures could place president at risk of receiving unnecessary psychotropic medications with possible medication side effects, adverse consequences, and decreased quality of life. Findings included: Review of Resident #21's face sheet dated 06/26/2024 reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses Alzheimer's Disease (A type of brain disorder that causes problems with memory, thinking and behavior. This is a gradually progressive condition.), Dementia (A group of symptoms that affects memory, thinking and interferes with daily life.), and Major Depressive disorder (A mental condition characterized by a persistently depressed mood and long-term loss of pleasure or interest in life, often with other symptoms such as disturbed sleep, feelings of guilt or inadequacy, and suicidal thoughts.) Review of Resident #21's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected Resident #21 was assessed to have a BIMS score of 8 indicate moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #21 was assessed to have inattention, disorganized thinking and altered levels of consciousness that fluctuates. Resident #21 was further assessed to have verbal behaviors one to three days a week. Review of Resident #21's comprehensive care plan reflected a problem dated 06/25/2024 Psychotropic drug use Resident #21 is at risk for adverse consequences related to receiving antipsychotic medication for treatment of Psychosis related to Alzheimer's/Dementia. Approaches included Assess/record effectiveness of drug treatment. Monitor and report signs of sedation, anticholinergic and/or extrapyramidal symptoms Monitor resident's behavior and response to medication .Quantitatively and objectively document the resident's behavior. Review of Resident #21's consolidated physician orders reflected the following orders: *Fluoxetine 40mg oral once daily dated 03/22/2024 , *Trazodone 100 mg oral at bedtime dated 03/22/2024, *Abilify 5mg once daily dated 03/22/2024, *Behavior monitoring twice daily for antidepressant drug Fluoxetine and trazodone dated 03/04/2022, *Monitor side effected twice daily for the antidepressant medication dated 03/04/2024, *Behavior monitoring twice daily antipsychotic drug use Abilify dated 03/04/2024, and *Monitor side effects of the antipsychotic medication Ability twice daily dated 03/04/2024. Observation on 06/25/2024 at 12:05 PM revealed Resident #21 was in dining room eating his lunch. Resident #21 was noted to be shaking when feeding himself. No behaviors were observed. Review of Resident #21's Consultant Pharmacist's Medication Regimen review dated 04/17/2024 reflected Please order BEHAVIOR MONITORING for TRAZODONE, ABILIFY . Review of Resident #21's MAR dated 05/01/2024 through 05/31/2024 reflected orders were not completed on the following dates: 1) Behavior monitoring twice daily: antidepressant drug Fluoxetine *05/01/2024, *05/06/2024, *05/10/2024 through 05/12/2024, *05/18/2024 through 05/21/2024, and *05/24/2024 through 05/31/2024. 2) Behavior monitoring twice daily: antidepressant drug Trazadone. *05/01/2024, *05/06/2024, *05/10/2024 through 05/12/2024, *05/18/2024 through 05/21/2024, and *05/24/2024 through 05/31/2024. 3) Monitor for side effects twice daily Antidepressants. *05/01/2024, *05/02/2024, *05/10/2024 through 05/13/2024, *05/17/2024 through 05/21/2024, and *05/24/2024 through 05/31/2024. 4) Behavior monitoring twice daily: Antipsychotic drug Abilify. *05/01/2024, *05/01/2024, *05/06/2024, *05/10/2024 through 05/13/2024, *05/17/2024 through 05/21/2024, and *05/24/2024 through 05/31/2024. 5) Monitor for side effects twice daily Antipsychotic drug use Abilify . *05/01/2024, *05/02/2024, *05/06/2024, *05/07/2024, *05/10/2024 through 05/14/2024, *05/17/2024 through 05/21/2024, and *05/24/2024 through 05/31/2024. In an interview on 06/26/2024 at 4:00 PM LVN A stated residents on psychotropic medications such as antidepressants and antipsychotics should be monitored for behaviors and medication side effects every shift. She stated sometimes it gets missed. In an interview on 06/27/2024 at 10:01 AM the DON stated she expected staff to document and check for psychotropic medications such as antidepressants and antipsychotics side effects and behaviors. She stated moving forward she would have to monitor the MARs to make sure the monitoring is being done. Review of the facility's policy Medication Management Program dated 07/13/2021 reflected The Facility implements a Medication Management program to meet the pharmaceutical needs of patients and residents, according to established standards of practice and regulatory requirements . Licensed nurses will evaluate, assess, monitor, document and report the effectiveness of the medication regimen that includes all medications and supplements prescribed to treat illness, disease process, or enhance the patient's/resident's quality of life . 1) Reduce Unnecessary and Supplementary Medications . b) Review medication regimen to discontinue unnecessary drugs.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Medication Errors (Tag F0758)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record reviews the facility failed to ensure PRN orders for psychotropic drugs were limited to 14 days, e...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record reviews the facility failed to ensure PRN orders for psychotropic drugs were limited to 14 days, except if the attending physician or prescribing practitioner believes that it is appropriate for the PRN order to be extended beyond 14 days, for one of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Residents #21) The facility failed to ensure Resident #21's PRN order for Haldol dated 05/06/2024 had a stop date transcribed onto the MAR to ensure the medication did not extend beyond 14 days causing Resident #21 to receive 7 doses beyond the physician ordered stop date of 05/20/2024. This deficient practice placed residents with PRN psychotropic drugs at risk for side effects of psychotropic drugs which include nausea, drowsiness, dizziness, confusion, constipation, diarrhea, and delirium and placed residents at risk for receiving unnecessary medications. Findings included: Review of Resident #21's face sheet dated 06/26/2024 reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses Alzheimer's Disease (A type of brain disorder that causes problems with memory, thinking and behavior. This is a gradually progressive condition.), Dementia (A group of symptoms that affects memory, thinking and interferes with daily life.), and Major Depressive disorder (A mental condition characterized by a persistently depressed mood and long-term loss of pleasure or interest in life, often with other symptoms such as disturbed sleep, feelings of guilt or inadequacy, and suicidal thoughts.) Review of Resident #21's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected Resident #21 was assessed to have a BIMS score of 8 indicate moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #21 was assessed to have inattention, disorganized thinking and altered levels of consciousness that fluctuates. Resident #21 was further assessed to have verbal behaviors one to three days a week. Review of Resident #21's comprehensive care plan reflected a problem dated 06/25/2024 Psychotropic drug use Resident #21 is at risk for adverse consequences related to receiving antipsychotic medication for treatment of Psychosis related to Alzheimer's/Dementia. Approaches included Assess/record effectiveness of drug treatment. Monitor and report signs of sedation, anticholinergic and/or extrapyramidal symptoms Monitor resident's behavior and response to medication .Quantitatively and objectively document the resident's behavior. Review of Resident #21's consolidated physician orders reflected the following orders: *dated 05/06/2024 Haloperidol 0.5mg one tab every 8 hours as needed for aggression. The order had a stop date of 05/07/2024. *dated 05/07/2024 for Haloperidol 0.5mg one tab every 8 hours as needed for aggression with a stop date of 05/20/2024. Review of Resident #21's MAR dated 05/01/2024 through 05/31/2024 reflected an entry for haloperidol 0.5mg one tab by mouth every eight hours as needed for aggression. No stop date was indicated on the MAR for the medication. The haloperidol was signed as given past the medication stop date on six occasions: 05/23/2024 through05/26/2024, 05/28/2024 and 05/30/2024. In an interview on 06/26/2024 at 4:00 PM LVN A stated Resident #21's order for Haldol was only supposed to be for 14 days but when it was put on the MAR no end date was indicated so we continued to use the medication as needed. In an interview on 06/27/2024 at 9:38 AM the DON stated she got the clarification for Resident #21's order for Haldol since on 05/06/2024 the order did not include a stop date so on 05/07/2024 it was clarified to have a stop date of 05/2024. The DON stated she put the order into the computer to include the stop date. She stated she did not print a new MAR she stated the nurses have access to the MARs in the computer. The DON stated they do not use the computer MARs to pass medications since they still use paper. The DON stated the change was on the change screen (24-hour report) and the nurses can see that. She stated there were a lot of steps done to prevent the error, but it occurred anyway Its Ridiculous In an interview on 06/27/2024 at 9:45 AM LVN A stated any order change does show up on the change screen but if the MARs with changes are not printed out the changes could be missed. LVN A stated that was why Resident 21's Haldol was given past the discontinuation date. Review of the facility's policy Medication Management Program dated 07/13/2021 reflected The Facility implements a Medication Management program to meet the pharmaceutical needs of patients and residents, according to established standards of practice and regulatory requirements . Licensed nurses will evaluate, assess, monitor, document and report the effectiveness of the medication regimen that includes all medications and supplements prescribed to treat illness, disease process, or enhance the patient's/resident's quality of life . 1) Reduce Unnecessary and Supplementary Medications . b) Review medication regimen to discontinue unnecessary drugs.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0801 (Tag F0801)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to employ staff with the appropriate competencies and skill sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition services for one of one ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to employ staff with the appropriate competencies and skill sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition services for one of one kitchen staff (Dietary manager) reviewed for qualified dietary staff. The facility failed to ensure the Dietary Manger completed an approved dietary manager training course. This failure could place the residents at risk for the spread of food borne illness and residents not having their nutritional needs met. Findings included: Record review of the personnel file for the Dietary Manager reflected she had not completed the certified Dietary Manager course. She had a date of hire of 03/04/2019. Interview on 06/26/2024 at 11:00 AM the Dietary Manager stated she began taking classes online approximately 3 years ago and she did finish her classes but did not take the test. She stated she did not have any proof of her passing classes online or when she signed up for the dietary manager courses. She stated she was not a certified Dietary Manger and she was not working under Registered Dietician license or a Certified Dietary Manager License. She stated she did have her food handler certificate and that was the only food service certificate she had at this time. She also stated she did not report to anyone that she did not have her certified dietary manager license and no one asked to see it until now. She stated she thought with her experience as a cook over 20 years and working the kitchen had justified her not being a qualified Dietary Manager. Interview via telephone on 06/26/2024 at 11:51 AM The Registered Dietician Consultant stated the Dietary Manager was not working under her license. She stated she thought the Dietary Manager had her certificate. She stated if she did not finish the Dietary Manger Course online she was not qualified to be a Dietary Manager. Interview on 06/27/2024 at 12:30 PM the Administrator stated he was not aware that the Dietary Manager did not have her certification/ license. He stated he had been in the facility for three weeks and was focusing on the nursing department and then he was going to focus on the dietary department. He stated he would be working on this issue. He stated all license of department heads was expected to be in their personnel records. He stated a registered dietician comes in and does the documentation. A request for the policy of dietary manager qualifications was made and was not provided at time of exit.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0804 (Tag F0804)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to prepare puree food by methods that conserve nutritive value, flavor, and appearance for one of one kitchen. The facility fai...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to prepare puree food by methods that conserve nutritive value, flavor, and appearance for one of one kitchen. The facility failed to provide puree recipes for the Dietary Manager to follow when preparing puree food. This failure could affect residents on puree diet at risk of receiving inadequate diet that could affect their health. Findings included: Observation on 06/26/2024 7:10 to 7:40 AM, Dietary Manager began to pureed eggs. She placed the eggs into the pureed blender and began to puree the eggs. She did not measure the eggs or have a recipe to follow. Observation of Dietary Manger pureed bacon The bacon was not the same size. One piece of bacon was shorter. The Dietary Manger place bread into the pureed blender and added water to the bread without measuring the water. She did not measure any food she pureed. Interview on 06/26/2024 at 7:50 AM, Dietary Manger stated she was required to use juice such as orange or apple juice when she pureed bread but she always used water. When asked where her recipes were to pureed food, she stated she did not have any recipes and did not follow recipes when pureed food. She stated she always used her judgement on how much food to place into the food blender. She stated she had been cooking approximately 20 years and she knew how much food to use without measuring the food or follow a recipe. She stated she did not need a recipe. She exited the kitchen and entered her office to search if she did have recipes. The Dietary Manager stated she did not have the spring/ summer recipes to follow and she did not know how to get the recipes. Interview via telephone on 06/26/2024 at 11:51 AM the Registered Dietician Consultant stated all recipes was online and everyone had access to these recipes. She stated she had shown the Dietary Manager how to access these recipes. She stated all cooks including the cooks with years of experience was expected to follow the recipes especially when they are pureeing food. She also stated it was very important to use the correct measurements. The Registered Dietician Consultant stated if the correct measurements were not used the consistency of the pureed food may not be correct. She stated water was never to be used in any foods when adding liquid during the puree process. She stated it was best practice to use broth, milk, or butter. She did not respond when asked what may happen to the pureed food if water was used as the liquid during the pureed process. Interview on 06/27/2024 at 11:15 AM the Administrator stated the dietary manager had been working as a cook for a very long time and she knew what she was doing when she prepared pureed food or any type of food. He stated he did not agree with guessing how much food to be added when the dietary manager pureed the food when being observed on Tuesday (06/26/2024). He stated he was not going to answer if it was ok not to follow a resident when pureeing food. The Administrator stated when an employee had been pureeing food repetitive every day it became repetition and they knew how to measure the food without a recipe and knew what size scoop to use with all foods. He stated if a cook pureed food all the time they would have it memorized and would be able to correct the pureed food if it did not look right without using a recipe. Record review of the Facility Policy on Nutrition Policies and Procedures revised on 08/01/2020 reflected prepare puree foods as per recipe.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0883 (Tag F0883)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident's medical records included documentation that indi...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident's medical records included documentation that indicated the resident, or their responsible party, received education of the benefits, and potential side effects, of the influenza or pneumococcal immunization, receipt of the influenza or pneumococcal immunization, or residents did not receive the influenza or pneumococcal immunization due to medical contraindication, or refusal, for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations. (Resident #8) The facility failed to document in Resident #8's medical records for having had received education, whether by self or with responsible party, of the benefits, and potential side effects, of the influenza immunization and receipt of the of the pneumococcal immunization or having had not received the pneumococcal immunization due to medical contraindication or refusal. This failure could place residents at risk of contracting a viral illness, influenza and pneumococcal, or being informed of the benefits/risk which could cause respiratory complications and potential adverse health outcomes. Findings include: Review of Resident #8's face sheet dated 06/27/2024 reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with the following diagnoses Dementia (A group of symptoms that affects memory, thinking and interferes with daily life.), Cerebral infarction (the pathologic process that results in an area of necrotic tissue in the brain. It is caused by disrupted blood supply (ischemia) and restricted oxygen supply (hypoxia).) , and acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (is a life-threatening condition where the lungs cannot provide enough oxygen to the body or remove enough carbon dioxide.). Review of Resident #8's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected Resident #8 was assessed to have a BIMS score of 6 indicating severe cognitive impairment. Resident #8 was further assessed to have been offered the influenza and pneumococcal vaccine and declined. Review of Resident #8's comprehensive care plan reflected no entries regarding immunization status. Review of Resident #8's consolidated physician orders reflected the following orders: *dated 03/10/2022 Last Pneumonia vaccine received. *dated 03/10/2022 May administer influenza vaccine annually. Review of Resident #8's immunization records in the EMR reflected no pneumonia vaccine record. Further review reflected an entry for influenza vaccine dated 09/29/2023 indicating the vaccine was not administered related resident refused based on conscientious objection. Under the section if education provided to resident/family or POA the facility checked 'no' on the form. In an interview on 06/27/2024 at 12:38 PM the RNC stated immunizations should be done and verified on admission. She stated if consent was not given then the facility should provide education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of the immunization. In an interview on 06/27/2024 at 12:45 PM the DON stated immunization should be done and verify on admission and consent and history should be done at that time. She stated immunizations were done by the MDS coordinator but since she was not at the facility anymore and the immunizations for Resident #8 got missed. The DON stated moving forward she would make sure residents immunization history was recorded for what vaccines were administered and make sure if residents or family's refuse vaccines that education was provided. Review of the facility's policy Immunization Recommendations for Patients, Residents and Health care Workers dated 07/15/2021 reflected The facility complies with current immunization and vaccination recommendations and requirements (where required), for patients, residents, and staff.1. Prior to offering or providing immunizations, applicable medical screening and evaluation will be provided. This screening may be done by a licensed health care provider, such as a physician. 2. Immunizations will not be given if determined to be medically contraindicated . One-time informed consent can be part of the admission process for influenza, pneumococcal, and other vaccines eliminating the need for annual consent except in states where annual consent is required. The facility will track all staff and resident vaccination status for all vaccines. Resident vaccination status will be documented in their medical record and include: Education provided to the resident or resident representative regarding the benefits and potential risks associated with the vaccines .
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0887 (Tag F0887)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record reviews, the facility failed to implement their policy to ensure the residents, or their responsib...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record reviews, the facility failed to implement their policy to ensure the residents, or their responsible party, received education of the benefits and risks, or potential side effects of Covid-19 immunizations, receipt of Covid-19 immunizations, or the residents did not receive the Covid-19 immunizations, due to medical contraindication, or refusal, for 1 of 5 residents who were reviewed for immunizations. (Resident #7) The facility failed to document in Resident #7's medical records for having had received education, whether by self or with their responsible party, of the benefits and risk, and potential side effects, of the Covid-19 immunization, receipt of the of the Covid-19 immunization, or having had not received the Covid-19 immunization due to medical contraindication or refusal. This failure could place residents at risk of not being informed of complications and potential adverse health outcomes. Findings include: Review of Resident #7's face sheet dated 06/27/2024 reflected an [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with the following diagnoses Anemia (Deficiency of healthy red blood cells in blood. Red blood cells are essential to carry oxygen to all parts of the body.) , Dementia (A group of symptoms that affects memory, thinking and interferes with daily life.) and right femur fracture. Review of Resident #7's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected Resident #4 was assessed to have a BIMS score of 1 indicating severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #7's comprehensive care plan reflected no entries regarding immunization status. Review of Resident #7's consolidated physician orders reflected no entries regarding immunizations. Review of Resident #7's immunization records in the EMR on 06/26/2024 reflected no entry regarding COVID-19 Vaccination. In an interview on 06/27/2024 at 12:38 PM the RNC stated immunizations should be done and verified on admission. She stated if consent was not given then the facility should provide education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of the immunization. In an interview on 06/27/2024 at 12:45 PM the DON stated immunization should be done and verify on admission and consent and history should be done at that time. She stated immunizations were done by the MDS coordinator but since she was not at the facility anymore and the immunizations for Resident #7 got missed. The DON stated moving forward she would make sure residents immunization history was recorded for what vaccines were administered and make sure if residents or family's refuse vaccines that education was provided. Review of the facility's policy Immunization Recommendations for Patients, Residents and Health care Workers dated 07/15/2021 reflected The facility complies with current immunization and vaccination recommendations and requirements (where required), for patients, residents, and staff.1. Prior to offering or providing immunizations, applicable medical screening and evaluation will be provided. This screening may be done by a licensed health care provider, such as a physician. 2. Immunizations will not be given if determined to be medically contraindicated . One-time informed consent can be part of the admission process for influenza, pneumococcal, and other vaccines eliminating the need for annual consent except in states where annual consent is required. The facility will track all staff and resident vaccination status for all vaccines. Resident vaccination status will be documented in their medical record and include: Education provided to the resident or resident representative regarding the benefits and potential risks associated with the vaccines .
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food accordan...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food accordance with professional standards for food service of one of one kitchen reviewed for food storage, meal prep and sanitation. 1. The facility failed to seal, label and date partially frozen chicken cubes and a personal cell phone on the food prep table. 2. The facility failed to ensure dietary staff practiced proper hand hygiene and glove use. 3. The facility failed to follow recipes when preparing pureed food. 4. The facility failed to ensure regional maintenance director and a contractor wore hair nets and a beard net when entered the kitchen, the dietary staff appropriately wore a hair net, and nursing staff wore a hair net when in the kitchen. These failures could place residents at risk for health complications and foodborne illnesses. Findings included: 1. Observation on 06/25/2024 from 9:06 AM to 9:16 AM there was an open clear plastic bag not labeled or dated of partially frozen cubed chicken on the food prep table. A cell phone was lying on the food prep table near a pot and the open bag of the partially frozen cubed chicken. In an interview on 06/25/2024 at 9:17 AM the Dietary Manager stated she had been away from the food prep area for several minutes. She stated the cubed chicken was pre-cooked. She also stated the plastic bag the chicken was stored in was not to be left opened and should have been closed until the time she was going to cook the chicken. She stated anything could fall into the bag of chicken. The Dietary Manager stated if there were flies in the kitchen the fly could fall into the open bag of chicken and fly out of the bag without the dietary staff knowledge which would contaminate the chicken cubed chicken. She also stated she was not a nurse and did not know if a resident would become ill if ingested contaminated chicken. Observation on 06/25/2024 at 9:22 AM Dietary Manager removed the cell phone from the kitchen area. She did not sanitize the food prep area and placed ladles where the cell phone was lying on the food prep area. Observation on 06/25/2024 at 9:45 AM Dietary Manager picked up one of the ladles laying on the area where cell phone was laying. She placed the ladle in the pot on the stove where dumplings were being prepared. In an interview on 06/25/2024 at 9:48 AM Dietary Manager stated she did place ladles where the cell phone was lying on the food prep table. She stated she removed the cell phone from the food prep table and did not sanitize the food prep area where the cell phone was located. Dietary Manager stated there was a potential the ladles may be contaminated after touching surface where the cell phone was lying on the food prep table. She stated cell phones are not sanitary and was considered contaminated. She also stated there was a possibility the bacteria from the cell phone could have cross contaminated the ladles. She stated she was not a nurse and does not know if a resident may become physically ill if the ladle had germs on it and was in the pot where food was being prepared. She stated she was expected to sanitize the food prep area after she removed the cell phone. She also stated the food prep area where the phone was located was not considered sanitized. Observation on 06/26/2024 from 7:10 AM to 7:25 Dietary Manager was preparing pureed food. She touched her shirt, her hair covering and the oven door handle. She did not wash or sanitize her hands and touched the outside of the fourchettes (where you place your fingers into a glove) on both gloves. She donned the gloves and touched inside the scoop. This portion of the scoop was used to hold the scramble eggs she obtained from the silver container on the steam table and she place the eggs in a white plastic container. Her middle finger and her fore finger on her right hand did touch top of the eggs when she was placing the scrambled eggs into the pureed blender. The Dietary Manager pureed the eggs and carried the pureed blender to the dishwashing room to clean before using it to puree other foods. She did not remove her gloves and before she entered the dishwashing room she touched the top of garbage can to throw away a napkin. The Dietary Manager proceeded to clean the pureed blender. She touched several surfaces on the dishwasher. She returned to the food prep area and did not change her gloves and touched part of the bacon she placed in the pureed blender. Interview on 06/26/2024 at 7:25 AM the Dietary Manager stated she did not wash or sanitize her hands prior to placing gloves on her hands when she pureed the eggs. She stated she did touch her shirt and she was in a hurry and did not know if she touched the eggs. She also stated she did touch the inside part of the scoop where eggs were placed after she dipped the scoop inside the scramble eggs on the steam table. The Dietary Manager stated it was possible she touched the garbage can lid when she discarded paper towel. She also stated she did not remove her gloves while she was in the dishwasher room and she did return to the kitchen and she did touch part of one piece of bacon without changing her gloves. She stated she was expected to change her gloves, wash hands and place new gloves on and she did not do this between tasks. She also stated there was a possibility germs or bacteria was on her gloves and she could have contaminated the containers, the scoop, and the food. She stated she was not a nurse and did not know if a resident may become ill if the ate any contaminated food. Observation on 06/26/2024 at 7:30 AM Dietary Aide B donned gloves without washing his hands and touched the lid of garbage can to throw away napkin. He touched inside of clean plates. Interview on 06/26/2024 at 7:32 AM Dietary Aide B stated he had been informed to always wash his hands before wearing gloves. He stated it was difficult to wash his hands and then wear gloves due to being difficult to attempting to place the gloves onto his hands. He stated he did not know if not washing his hands would contaminate the gloves. He did not respond to any further questions about hand sanitation, wearing gloves and touching clean plates with potential contaminated gloves. Observation on 06/26/2024 at 7:33 AM the Dietary Manager removed her gloves and placed new gloves on without washing or sanitizing her hands. She touched the fourchettes of the gloves when she donned the gloves. She touched the bread with her gloved hands and place the bread in the pureed container. After she pureed the bread and placed the bread in a silver container on the steam table, she went to her office and looked for recipes. She touched 3 manuals in her office, picked up a pen and wrote something on a sheet of paper, touched her desk, moved her personal phone on her desk and touched a cup on her desk. She was wearing the same gloves. The Dietary Manager returned to the kitchen area with the same gloves on her hands and she picked up the food thermometer and touched the part of the thermometer used to place into the food to check the temperature of the food. Interview on 06/26/2024 at 7:50 AM The Dietary Manager stated she realized she did not remove her gloves and wash her hands after she had begun touching the outside of the gloves when she was placing the gloves on her hands. She stated she knew she had already made a mistake earlier and she would probably be written out for not washing her hands or changing her gloves earlier and she thought if she was already getting written out she would just continue since she made the same mistake again. She stated she was required to change her gloves in between tasks and wash her hands prior to placing new gloves on her hands. She stated she did touch the bread without changing her gloves. She also stated when was in her office she touched the manuals, pen, paper, her cell phone on her desk and probably touched the cup on her desk. She stated she did enter the kitchen without changing her gloves and touched the part of the thermometer she placed in the food to obtain a temperature of the food. She stated she was expected to change her gloves and wash her hands after she left her office and before she obtained temperature of the food. She stated she had already made mistake of not changing her gloves and she was not thinking clearly. Interview via telephone on 06/26/2024 at 11:51 AM The Registered Dietician Consultant stated anyone enters the kitchen area was required to wear a hair net. If a male had facial hair the male was required to wear a beard net. She stated this included anyone working in other departments such as nursing and any contractors entered the kitchen. She stated hair could fall onto food, food prep areas and clean dishes. She did not respond to any other questions if someone was not wearing a hair net in the kitchen. Observation on 06/27/2024 at 10:38 AM Dietary Aide C gave Regional Maintenance Director a hair net and beard net. Dietary Aide C was wearing gloves and his middle finger and fore finger on his right hand touched the Regional Maintenance Director palm on his right hand. Dietary Aide C touched his own shirt and touched the door handle of the kitchen door. He exited the main area of the kitchen and entered the dishwashing room and touched the following clean silverware without changing his gloves: the tines (area of the fork where food is placed prior to eating the food) of six clean forks, touched inside the scoop where food is placed in a spoon of four spoons, and touched the top of four knives. Interview on 06/27/2024 at 10:41 AM Dietary Aide C stated his fingers inside his gloves did touch the Regional Maintenance Director hand. He also stated he did not change his gloves and did touch the part of the fork and spoon where residents would put the food on the fork and spoon to put the food in their mouths. He also stated he did touch the tip of the forks and there was a possibility the silverware may have germs on them from his gloves. He stated if a resident did eat some germs they may become sick with stomach problems may have diarrhea. Observation and interview on 06/26/2024from 7:30 to 7:32 AM Dietary Aide B was standing near clean plates his hair net was not covering all of his hair. There was approximately 6-8 inches of hair on the side and the back of his head not covered. Dietary Aide B stated there was a possibility hair may fall onto the plates. He stated his hair was not completely covered with the hair net. He stated he was not a nurse and did not know what possibly may happen to a resident if hair was on resident plate or food and the resident ate the hair. Observation on 06/26/2024 at 8:07 AM, CNA D entered the kitchen area without wearing a hair net. She was standing five to six feet inside the kitchen. CNA D was within approximately less than one foot next to uncovered plates of food for residents eating in their rooms. Her hair was shoulder length. In an interview on 06/26/2024 at 8:12 AM CNA D stated she was standing inside the kitchen and was standing over plates of food uncovered. She stated she was standing near the food prep area. She also stated she was expected to wear a hair net anytime anyone entered the kitchen. She stated she had been in-serviced on wearing hair nets when nursing staff entered the kitchen. CNA D stated there was a possibility her hair could have fallen onto the food as she was standing over the plate of food that was going down the hall on a hall cart. CNA D stated hair was considered contaminated and a resident may become ill if there was hair on their food and the resident ate the hair. She also stated the resident may become physically ill with vomiting or diarrhea from the bacteria from the hair. Interview on 06/27/2024 at 8:40 AM the Administrator stated he would provide all dietary staff personnel records and their check off list of training. The Dietary Manager personnel record was the only dietary personnel record provided. Observation on 06/27/2024 at 9:55 AM a Contractor entered the kitchen and he had approximately 8 inches of facial hair around his chin. He was not wearing a hair net or beard net. He was standing in the food prep area of the kitchen. Interview on 06/27/2024 at 9:58 AM the Contractor stated he was aware of wearing a hair net and beard net when he entered the kitchen and he stated he frequently made deliveries to this kitchen throughout the month. He stated he forgot to place the hair net and beard net on when he entered the kitchen. He stated he knew this was a rule and he did not follow the rules. He stated there was a possibility hair could fall onto surfaces in the kitchen. The contractor did not respond to any further questions about hair being contaminated or the importance of wearing hair net and beard net. Interview on 06/27/2024 at 10:02 AM The Dietary Manager stated the contractor had been explained to wear hair net and beard net when he entered the kitchen. She stated there was a possibility he could have contaminated the food being prepared when standing near the food prep table. She stated there were hair net and beard net accessible at the door when entering the kitchen. Requested in-services on the following: hand sanitizing/ wearing gloves, pureed food, follow recipes, and wearing hair nets/ beard nets, label/ dating food, keeping containers of food closed until ready to use, and storing personal items on the food prep tables. These in-services were not provided at time of exit. Observation on 06/27/2024 at 10:30 AM there were beard nets and hair nets stored at the entrances to the kitchen. The Regional Maintenance Director was standing by the food prep table in the kitchen area without wearing a hair net or beard net. There were containers of food on the food prep table where he was standing. Interview on 06/27/2024 at 10:35 AM the Regional Maintenance Director stated he did know to wear a hair net and beard net when he entered the kitchen. He stated this was standard protocol in every kitchen in a nursing home. He stated he was standing near the food prep table and there was food where he was standing. He also stated it was a possibility hair may fall into the food. He stated he was not a nurse and did not know what would happen to a resident if they ate food with hair on the food. Interview on 06/27/2024 at 11:15 AM the Administrator stated any staff including contractors that entered the kitchen was expected to wear hair nets and if needed a beard net. He stated there was a possibility of hair falling on food prep surfaces, plates and /or foods. He stated he was not a nurse and did not know what may happen to a resident if the resident ingested hair. He stated hair may or may not be contaminated it was according to the individual. He stated all dietary staff was expected to wear gloves when in the kitchen. The Administrator also stated he did expect the dietary staff to change their gloves in between tasks or when touch any contaminated item. He stated the staff was expected to wash hands prior to placing gloves on their hands. The Administrator did not answer any questions about if the dietary staff was wearing contaminated gloves and touched food, plates, silverware, or any food containers. He stated the staff personal items including cell phone was not to be placed on the food prep table. He stated if it was on the food prep table he did expect the table to be sanitized. The administrator did not respond to the question if the food prep table was not sanitized and food was being prepared on that table if the there was a possibility of cross contamination. Requested in-services from the dietary department such as: hand sanitizing/ wearing gloves, pureed food, follow recipes, and wearing hair nets/ beard nets, label/ dating food, keeping containers of food closed until ready to use, and storing personal items on the food prep tables. These in-services were not provided prior to exit. Record review request via email on 06/26/2024 at 5:32 PM reflected in-services given to dietary staff prior to 06/24/2024 was requested on the policies requested such as: 1. Following Recipes 2. Employee personal items where food was being prepared. 3. Hand Hygiene and wearing gloves. 4. Hair nets and beard nets. 5. Label, dating and storage of foods 6. Copy of the kitchen cleaning schedule These was not provided at the time of exit. Record review of the facilities Nutrition Policies and Procedures revised on 06/20/2203 reflected appropriate hair restraints such as hats, hair covers or nets, and beard restraints [NAME] involved in food production activities. Hand hygiene is the most important component for preventing the spread of infection. Proper hand washing technique will be used when hand washing is indicated. Wash hands before putting on gloves, when changing into a fresh pair of gloves, and immediately after removing gloves. Before handling food. After contact with soiled or contaminated articles. Antimicrobial gel cannot be used in the kitchen during food preparation. Review of the Food and Drug Administration Food Code, dated 2022, reflected, .3-302.12 Food Storage Containers, Identified with Common Name of Food .3-305.11 Food Storage.(B) .refrigerated, ready-to eat time/temperature control for safety food prepared and packaged by a food processing plant shall be clearly marked, at the time the original container is opened in a food establishment and if the food is held for more than 24 hours, to indicate the date or day by which the food shall be consumed on the premises, sold, or discarded, based on the temperature and time combinations specified in (A) of this section and: (1) The day the original container is opened in the food establishment shall be counted as Day 1; and (2) The day or date marked by the food establishment may not exceed a manufacturer's use-by date if the manufacturer determined the use-by date based on food safety
Jan 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that included measurable objectives and timetables to meet a resident's medical and nursing needs for one (Resident #1) of four residents reviewed for care plans, in that: The facility failed to develop a care plan for Resident #1's sacrum (a shield shaped bony structure that is located at the base of the lumbar vertebrae and that is connected to the pelvis) stage four pressure ulcer and the care plan did not address his non-compliance with treatment. This failure could place residents at risk for not having their individual care needs met, errors in providing care, poor wound healing/worsening wound condition. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's Face Sheet dated 1/4/2024 reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with the following diagnoses Adult failure to thrive (older adult has a loss of appetite, eats and drinks less than usual, and is less active than normal), Osteomyelitis of vertebrae (painful bone infection that develops from bacteria or fungi, is itself rare), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (chronic condition in which a patient's lungs are susceptible to infections and moreover, the infections show exaggerated symptoms in the patients. Hence there is higher risk of morbidity and mortality in the patients suffering from COPD (as compared to normal people), and chronic respiratory failure (when the lungs cannot get enough oxygen into the blood or eliminate enough carbon dioxide from the body). Review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] reflected Resident #1 was assessed to have a BIMS score of 13 indicating cognition was intact. Resident #1 was assessed to be dependent on staff for ADL assistance. Resident #1 was assessed to have unhealed pressure ulcer and a wound infection. Resident #1 was on routine pain medications. Review of Resident #1's Comprehensive Care Plan dated from 12/04/2023 to 01/04/2024 reflected a focus area revised on 12/21/2023 Resident #1 had pain. Resident #1 had COPD. Resident #1 was assessed for intolerance related to imbalance between supply oxygenation needs. Resident #1 pressure ulcer to the sacrum was not assessed on the current care plan dated 12/21/2023. Review of Resident #1's Consolidated Physician orders dated from 12/04/2023 to 01/04/2024 reflected an order dated 09/26/2023 reflected daily wound treatment: Stage 3; clean with NS/NC; pat dry: apply skin prep to wound edges; apply honey alginate calcium to wound bed; cover with foam silicone bordered dressing QD (every day) and PRN (as needed). Order was d/c (discharged ) on 12/07/2023. Review of Resident #1's Consolidated Physician Orders dated from 12/04/2023 to 01/04/2024 reflected an order dated 11/08/2023 with an end date of 11/23/2023 reflected daily wound treatment: special instructions: alginate calcium apply once daily for 15 days. Foam silicone bdr (do not know acronym for bdr) and faced apply once daily for 15 days once a day. Review of Resident #1's Consolidated Physician Orders dated from 12/04/2023 to 01/04/2024 reflected an order dated 12/07/2023 reflected daily wound treatment to sacrum. Superabsorbent gelling fiber pad apply once daily for 16 days; Sodium hypochlorite gel (anasept) apply once daily for 30 days. Order was d/c on 01/05/2024. Review of Resident #1's Consolidated Physician Orders dated from 12/04/2023 to 01/04/2024 reflected an order dated 12/29/2023. Daily wound treatment: sacrum; negative pressure wound therapy apply three times per week for 30 days: 125 mm hg, black or green foam in wound bed, bridge to either hip. Change TIW the bone in the wound bed just slightly larger than the wound cavity. End date 01/30/2024. *Review on 01/19/2023 of Resident #1's Care Plan Conference Summary reflected the issue of non-compliance with repositioning was discussed with family and family offered support for encouraging the resident. Review on 01/19/2024 of Resident #1's Care Plan reflected no interventions to address resident's non-compliant with treatment. In an interview on 01/04/2023 at 3:30 PM the ADON stated the facility was trying to update all the documents into the new electronic medical records. She stated all the documents related to Resident #1 were reviewed by her and she thought the pressure ulcer was on the care plan. She stated it was her responsibility to complete care plans and she did not know why the wound for Resident #1 was not on the care plan. She stated all medical, emotional, behavior issues with a resident were expected to be on the care plan. The ADON stated the care plan was how all staff knew what type of care a resident has been identified by the interdisciplinary team. She stated there was a possibility a resident may not receive the appropriate care during their stay at the facility. In an interview on 01/04/2024 at 4:00 PM the Administrator stated the ADON was responsible for care plans and he did not understand why Resident #1's wound was not on the care plan. He stated he did not know what to say about the care plans. He stated all residents' medical needs were expected to be on the care plan. He stated the resident may not get the care needed. In an interview on 01/04/2024 at 4:10 PM requested a care plan policy from the Administrator and it was not provided at the time of exit.
Apr 2023 7 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of a...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible for one of two smoking areas (Smoking Area 1)observed for hazards The facility Smoking Area 1 had a plastic trash can in use and no useable metal trash cans, and there was a splintered board on the seat of one of the porch swings in the area. These failures placed residents at risk of burns and lacerations to the skin. Findings included: Observation on 04/25/23 at 04:10 PM revealed six residents in Smoking Area 1 smoking under the supervision of the AD. There was a tall plastic trashcan with a push door on the lid in the center of the smoking area. There were multiple spots indicating the size and shape of the lit end of cigarettes and some burn marks on the lip of the lid in front of the push door. One resident put his cigarette out on the lip in front of the push door. This did not create a melted area, but it did create a small burn mark. There was a red, push lidded, metal wastebasket against a fence several feet from the resident smoking area with a long broom handle sitting in it. Within the bin of the wastebasket was visible a large clump of [NAME] seeds, some fungus which had grown there, and the rusted-out metal bottom of the can. Further observation revealed two freestanding wooden porch swings in this smoking area, and one of them had a cracked slat with sharp splintered wood sticking out in the area where the back of an average-sized person's knee would rest if she/he were seated in the swing. During an interview on 04/26/23 at 03:50 PM, the MAINT stated he had not set up the smoking area but did build the porch swings and did not know one had a cracked slat. He stated he could fix it right away. The MAINT stated the cracked slat on the porch swing could have injured a resident. During an observation and interview on 04/26/23 at 04:02 PM, the ADM stated he was not aware the trashcan used in the smoking area was plastic. After observing the smoking area and the melt and burn marks in the trash can lid, he stated that was a fire and burn hazard and could be corrected immediately. The ADM observed the cracked wooden slat on the porch swing and stated that was an injury hazard. When asked how he monitored for safety in the smoking area, he stated he did rounds on the building but could not remember when he had last observed the smoking area. The ADM stated the AD was primarily responsible for the resident smoking area. During an interview on 04/27/23 at 02:59 PM, the AD stated she did not know who had brought the plastic trash can into the smoking area, but it was not her. The AD stated the ADM had taken the trash can away and told her there were burn marks on it. The AD stated she had not received training on what was required in the resident smoking area. She stated she did not notice the broken seat board on the porch swing. The AD stated people occasionally use that swing, but nearly all the residents were in wheelchairs, and she could not think of any residents who used it. Review of the National Fire Prevention Association 101 federal tag 702 reflected the following: (6) Metal containers with self-closing cover devices into which ashtrays can be emptied shall be readily available to all areas where smoking is permitted.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Respiratory Care (Tag F0695)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure respiratory care was provided consistent with ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure respiratory care was provided consistent with professional standards of practice for one of one residents (Resident #2) reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's oxygen tubing was dated with the date it was changed. This failure could place all residents who use respiratory equipment at risk for respiratory infections. Findings included: Record review of Resident #2's undated Face Sheet reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (a group of lung disease that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe), and Shortness of breath, and Conduct Disorder (group of behavioral and emotional problems characterized by a disregard for others). Record review of Resident #2's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] reflected she had a BIMS score of 3 indicating severe cognitive impairment. Observation on 04/25/2023 at 9:19 AM of Resident #2's oxygen tubing revealed it was not dated. Observation and Interview on 04/25/2023 at 9:30 AM LVN A observed Resident #2's oxygen tubing and stated it was supposed to be changed out every Tuesday. She stated, I'm not sure what the policy is but I date it [tubing]. Interview on 04/27/2023 at 1:18 PM the IDON stated the company wide practice was to change the oxygen tubing weekly and by not changing the tubing weekly it could grow bacteria and the resident could end up with an infection. Interview on 04/2720/23 at 10:15 AM the ADM stated oxygen tubing should be dated so they would know it was clean and not contaminated. He stated did not know potential outcome to the resident if the oxygen was not changed out weekly. Record review of a facility's Policy and Procedure dated 04/01/2022 and titled Oxygen Therapy General Policy reflected label tubing and humidifier with date, time and practitioner initials.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure, in accordance with State and Federal laws, all...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure, in accordance with State and Federal laws, all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments under proper temperature controls and permitted only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for one of one medication carts and one of one loose pill reviewed for medication storage. 1. The facility failed to ensure the medications for Resident #2 were placed inside of the medication cart when the nurse left the cart for 12 minutes. 2. The facility failed to secure Resident #16's Oxcarbazepine after it fell on the floor. This failure could place residents at risk of ingesting unprescribed medications resulting in adverse health consequences. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #2's undated Face Sheet reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Parkinson's Disease (a disorder of the central nervous system that affects movement, often including tremors), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (a group of lung disease that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe), Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus without complications (a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar ), Anorexia (an eating disorder causing people to obsess about weight and what they eat), Shortness of breath, and Conduct Disorder (group of behavioral and emotional problems characterized by a disregard for others). Observation on 04/26/2023 at 7:03 AM of a medication pass for Resident #2 by LVN A revealed she left a bottle of Vitamin D3, and inhalers Incuse Ellipta and Breo Ellipta on top of the medication cart while she went to retrieve additional medications out of the medication storage room. LVN A returned to the medication cart at 7:15 AM. LVN A then went into Resident #2's room to administer medications and left the bottle of Vitamin D3 on top of the medication cart. Interview on 04/26/2023 07.26 AM LVN A stated by leaving medications on top of the cart, someone could have come by and taken or ingested them. She stated the potential side effect of ingesting the medications could be an allergic reaction. She stated the inhalers could burn their mouth. Interview on 04/27/2023 at 10:00 AM the IDON stated medications should always be locked inside of the carts and if left out, anyone could get ahold of them and take them. Interview on 04/27/2023 at 10:15 AM the ADM his expectations would be for the nurse to place mediations inside of the cart and lock it. He stated it was a big problem as the residents could come along and ingest the meds. I'm not a clinician so I do not know the potential risk of taking them. Record review of a facility's Policy and Procedure dated 07/13/2021 titled Medication Management Programs reflected medications, chemicals or other dangerous articles are not to be left on top of the cart. 2. Record review of Resident #16's undated Face Sheet reflected he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Bi-Polar Disorder (a disorder associated with episodes of mood swings ranging from depressive lows to manic highs), need for assistance with personal care, Nightmare Disorder (pattern of repeated frightening and vivid dreams that affects quality of life) Major Depressive Disorder (mental health disorder characterized by persistently depressed mood or loss of interest in activities, causing significant impairment in daily life) Schizoaffective Disorder (chronic mental health disorder characterized by hallucinations or delusions and symptoms of a mood disorder such as mania [highs] or depression [lows]), non-pressure chronic ulcer (sore) of lower leg, and Neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder (lack of bladder control due to a brain, spinal cord or nerve problem). Record review of Resident #16's Care Plan dated 04/25/2023 reflected he had a pressure ulcer located on his left lateral ankle and he was to receive treatments as ordered. Record review of Resident #16's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] reflected he had a BIMS score of 14 indicating intact cognitive status. Record review of the physician orders for Resident #16 reflected an order dated 01/13/23 for Oxcarbazepine/oxcarbazepine 300 mg one time per day. Observation on 04/27/23 at 09:08 AM revealed a yellow medication tablet on the floor outside the dining room door. The DON was notified and retrieved the tablet. During an interview on 04/27/23 at 10:00 AM, the IDON stated she had investigated the yellow tablet and discovered it was Oxcarbazepine prescribed to Resident #16. The IDON stated she had spoken to LVN A, who had administered Resident #16's medication that morning, and she stated she did not know what happened or how the pill ended up on the floor. The IDON stated LVN A claimed to have administered Oxcarbazepine to Resident #16 that morning as ordered. The IDON stated Resident #16 had told her immediately without her sharing any details that LVN A had dropped the pill during his medication administration that morning and had given him another one. During an interview on 04/27/23 at 12:38 PM, LVN A stated she administered Resident #16's Oxcarbazepine as ordered and did not know what had happened with the tablet that had been found on the floor. She denied dropping a tablet or any other occurrence that could have resulted in an unsecured medication. She stated Resident #16 was taking the Oxcarbazepine for his depression and had no mood swings or adverse effects, because he had received his medication. When asked how she could be sure he received his Oxcarbazepine if it was found on the floor, she stated she did not know, but he had received it. LVN A stated she had watched him take his medications and had not walked away. LVN A stated a potential negative impact of the Oxcarbazepine being on the floor was that another resident could have picked it up and ingested it. Review of a Mayo Clinic webpage found at Oxcarbazepine (Oral Route) Side Effects - Mayo Clinic and titled Oxcarbazepine (Oral Route) Side Effects reflected the following: More common Change in vision change in walking or balance clumsiness or unsteadiness cough crying dizziness double vision false sense of well-being feeling of constant movement of self or surroundings fever mental depression sensation of spinning sneezing sore throat uncontrolled back-and-forth or rolling eye movements Less common Agitation awkwardness bloody or cloudy urine blurred vision bruising confusion about identity, place, and time decreased urination difficulty with focusing the eyes dizziness, faintness, or lightheadedness when getting up suddenly from a lying or sitting position fast or irregular heartbeat frequent falls frequent urge to urinate headache hoarseness increased thirst loss of consciousness memory loss muscle cramps pain or burning while urinating pain or tenderness around the eyes or cheekbones problems with coordination shaking or trembling of the arms, legs, hands, and feet seizures skin rash stuffy or runny nose tightness in the chest trouble with walking troubled breathing unusual feelings unusual tiredness or weakness
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment, and t...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment, and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections, for one of one staff (LVN A) observed for infection control practices. 1. LVN A used a contaminated glove to touch and administer Resident #10's medications. 2. LVN A failed to sanitize her hands and replace her gloves prior to performing wound care for Resident #5. These failures could place residents who require assistance with medication administration and wound care at risk for healthcare associated cross-contamination and infections. Findings include: 1. Observation on 04/26/2023 at 7:35 AM of a medication pass for Resident #10 by LVN A who placed gloves on her hands then touched the medication administration record, keys, and medication cart drawers. LVN A then picked up a pill cup and her contaminated gloved finger was placed inside the cup it. She placed Prozac 20 Tizanidine 2mg, Divalproex DR 125 mg, and Zinc 50 mg in the cup with her contaminated gloves. She wiped her sweaty brow with her gloved right hand then administered the medications to Resident #10. Interview on 04/26/2023 at 7:52 AM, LVN A stated it was an infection control issue for her to touch Resident #10's medications with her unclean gloved hand. 2 Observation on 04/26/2023 at 9:55 AM LVN A washed her hands, gloved, then went into Resident #5's room to perform wound care. LVN A then went back to the treatment cart in the hall, opened a drawer with her gloved hands and retrieved items. Without cleaning her hands or changing gloves, LVN A cleansed Resident #5's wound with gauze and wound cleanser, placed hydrogel dry dressings and wrapped the wound with a gauze wrap. Interview on 04/26/2023 at 10:10 AM LVN A stated not washing her hands and changing her gloves prior to performing wound care was an infection control issue. Interview on 04/27/2023 at 10:00 AM the IDON stated if contaminated gloves that have touched other surfaces touch the medications, then they are transferring bacteria to the medications and contaminating them. She stated if the residents ingest the contaminated medications, it could make them sick. Interview on 04/27/2023 at 10:15 AM the ADM stated his expectations would be contaminated gloves should not touch the pills or the inside of the pill cup. He stated the pills could be contaminated and it could cause an illness. Record review of a facility's Policy and Procedure dated 07/13/2021 titled Medication Management Programs reflected Administering the Medication pass 1. Wash hands.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Resident Rights (Tag F0550)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to treat each resident with dignity and respect and care...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to treat each resident with dignity and respect and care for residents in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for three of four residents (Resident #16, Resident #5, and Resident #10) reviewed for dignity. 1. Resident #16's door and curtain were left open while he received wound care to his ankle. 2. Resident #5's wound care was performed with the door to the hallway open and the privacy curtain was not pulled. 3. Resident #10's wound care was performed with the privacy curtain partially closed, exposing his buttock and leg to anyone passing by in the hallway. These failures placed residents at risk for an undignified existence due to exposure of body parts during medical treatments. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #16's undated Face Sheet reflected he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of need for assistance with personal care, Major Depressive Disorder (mental health disorder characterized by persistently depressed mood or loss of interest in activities, causing significant impairment in daily life), non-pressure chronic ulcer (sore) of lower leg. Record review of Resident #16's Care Plan dated 04/25/2023 reflected he had a pressure ulcer located on his left lateral ankle and he was to receive treatments as ordered. Record review of Resident #16's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] reflected he had a BIMS score of 14 indicating intact cognitive status. Observation on 04/25/2023 at 10:06 AM of LVN A performing wound care to Resident #16's left ankle revealed the door to the hallway was left wide open during entire wound care procedure and the curtain was not closed. Numerous staff and residents passed though the hallway during the procedure. 2. Record review of Resident #5's undated Face Sheet reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Vascular Dementia (brain damage caused by multiple strokes), Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with other circulatory complications (a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar, if high blood sugar is too high it damages blood vessels), unspecified sequelae (a condition which is the consequence of a previous illness or injury) of Cerebral Infarction (brain stroke), and Peripheral Vascular Disease (circulatory condition in which narrowed blood vessels reduce blood flow to the limbs). Record review of Resident #5's Physician orders dated 04/14/2023 reflected to non-pressure wound right posterior (bask) ankle full thickness. Float heels in bed and off load wound. [keep heels off bed to reduce pressure to wound]. Record review of Resident #5's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] reflected she had a BIMS score of 15 indicating intact cognitive status. Observation on 04/26/2023 at 9:55 AM of LVN A performing wound care for Resident #5 revealed the door to the hallway was left open and the curtain was not closed during the entire procedure. Numerous staff and residents passed though the hallway during the procedure. 3. Record review of Resident #10's undated Face Sheet reflected he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of age-related physical debility (state of general weakness), and unspecified open wound of right buttock. Record review of Resident #10's Care Plan dated 12/13/2022 reflected he had a pressure ulcer/injury to the right gluteus (buttock). Record review of Resident #10's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] reflected he had a BIMS score of 15 indicating intact cognitive status. Observation on 04/26/2023 at 10:26 AM of LVN A performing wound care for Resident #10's right buttock revealed the curtain was partially pulled back. Surveyor walked to door and was able to observe the residents exposed buttock and leg. Interview on 04/26/2023 at 10:44 AM LVN A stated regarding Resident #16, #5, and #10's wound care, leaving the curtains and doors open during wound care was a HIPAA violation and violated the resident's privacy. Interview on 04/27/2023 at 9:15 AM CNA B stated the curtains and door should be closed for respect and dignity for the residents while providing care. Interview on 04/27/2023 at 9:32 AM CNA C stated staff should always pull the curtains and close the doors for resident privacy. She stated not closing the curtains and doors was a dignity issue. Interview on 04/27/2023 at 10:00 AM the IDON stated, Staff should always provide privacy while giving care and no one should have visual access to their naked bodies at any time and it was a dignity issue. Interview on 04/27/2023 at 10:15 AM the ADM stated his expectations would be for all staff to close doors during patient care. He stated leaving the leaving the doors open during care could be embarrassing to the residents. Review of a facility Policy and Procedure dated 10/01/2023 and titled Patient/Resident Rights reflected The facility treats each resident with respect and dignity.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordan...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for one of one kitchen reviewed for food storage, preparation, and service. 1. The facility dishwasher was out of sanitizer and still being used to wash dishes. 2. The CK/DM failed to sanitize the puree bowl between puree dishes and used unsanitized tongs to handle sausage during the puree process. 3. There was no system in place to accurately monitor holding temperatures for the pureed foods. These failures placed residents at risk of food-borne illness. Findings included: 1. Observation on 04/26/23 at 12:26 PM revealed an Autochlor A5 Water Saver dishwasher (chemically sanitizing dishwasher) in the facility kitchen. When a wash/rinse cycle of the machine was conducted with a plastic coffee cup, the available chemical test strips did not indicate any presence of chlorine or other disinfecting fluid. DA D ran the dishwasher again and tried detecting chemical in the water on the surface of the coffee cup again, and no presence of chemical resulted. During an interview on 04/26/23 at 12:30 PM, DA A stated he tested the chemical content of the dishwasher daily and had done so earlier that morning before breakfast. DA A stated he logged the results of his tests on a paper form hanging on the wall behind the dishwasher. DA A stated the chemical must have run out on the dishwasher. He stated the chemical content should have registered at 50 ppm. During an interview on 04/26/23 at 12:40 PM, the ADM stated the chemical sanitizer had run out in the dishwasher, and he had just ensured an order was put in for more. He stated the facility would revert to disposable dishes until the chemical sanitizer was restored to the dishes. The ADM stated the residents had already been served lunch and were eating, and there was no way to guarantee they did not eat on dishes that had not been properly sanitized. Review of the log hanging behind the dishwasher reflected an entry for 04/26/23 with a checkmark next to it and no further information. Review of the 2022 FDA Food Code reflected the following: 4-204.117 Warewashing Machines, Automatic Dispensing of Detergents and Sanitizers. The presence of adequate detergents and sanitizers is necessary to effect clean and sanitized utensils and equipment. The automatic dispensing of these chemical agents, plus a method such as a flow indicator, flashing light, buzzer, or visible open air delivery system that alerts the operator that the chemicals are no longer being dispensed, ensures that utensils are subjected to an efficacious cleaning and sanitizing regimen. 2. Observation on 04/25/23 at 11:04 AM revealed the CK/DM pureed one scoopful of broccoli in a food processor, rinsed the processor bowl under running water in a sink next to the preparation area without using any soap or sanitizing solution, poured the pureed broccoli into a small chafing dish, and pureed rice with milk in the food processor bowl. She then rinsed the food processor bowl in the nearby sink without using soap or sanitizer, poured the pureed rice into a small chafing dish, and pureed whole pinto beans. The CK/DM then poured the pinto beans into a small chafing dish and rinsed the food processor bowl in the same sink. There were still beans visible on the inside of the food processor. She then retrieved a chafing dish filled with Polish sausage from the cook area and pulled a pair of metal tongs out of the bottom of the sink where she had been pouring and rinsing the food processor bowl and retrieved a sausage link with the tongs. She proceeded to puree the sausage in the food processor bowl. During an interview on 04/25/23 at 11:10 AM, CK/DM stated her last supervisor said she did not even have to rinse the food processor bowl in between pureeing different food items, but she did not like to leave food in there, so she rinsed some of it out. The CK/DM stated she was not a certified dietary manager and had been going to school to become certified, but she had to take over the dietary manager position when the last one quit, and she had not been able to attend her classes, because she was working so hard as the CK and DM. The CK/DM stated the town the facility was in was very small, and there were no options for dietary manager or cook applying for the jobs. Review of the 2022 FDA Food Code reflected the following: The 3 compartment requirement allows for proper execution of the 3-step manual warewashing procedure. If properly used, the 3 compartments reduce the chance of contaminating the sanitizing water and therefore diluting the strength and efficacy of the chemical sanitizer that may be used. Alternative manual warewashing equipment, allowed under certain circumstances and conditions, must provide for accomplishment of the same 3 steps: 1. Application of cleaners and the removal of soil; 2. Removal of any abrasive and removal or dilution of cleaning chemicals; and 3. Sanitization. Refer also to the public health reason for § 4-603.16. 3. Observation on 04/25/23 at 11:48 AM revealed the CK/DM attempted to take the temperature of the pureed sausage, but there was too little food depth to measure with only one serving of each dish in each chafing dish. The CK/DM stated she did not have a way to measure the temperature of the pureed food and did not know she needed to do so. When asked if she did not regularly or daily take the holding temperature of the pureed foods, she stated she normally did that later on but did not clarify what that meant. Review of the 2022 FDA Food Code reflected the following: Hot Holding In a January 2001 report, the National Advisory Committee on Microbiological Criteria for Foods (NACMCF) recommended that the minimum hot holding temperature specified in the Food Code: FDA believes that maintaining food at a temperature of 57°C (135°F) or greater during hot holding is sufficient to prevent the growth of pathogens and is therefore an effective measure in the prevention of foodborne illness. During an interview and record review on 04/27/23 at 08:44 AM, the LD stated she came to the facility in person once a month, and all her other duties were remote. The LD stated the company that owns the facility placed the responsibility for most of the kitchen inspections/sanitation reports with the dietary manager and administrator positions, but she did conduct her own kitchen inspection when she came to the building from a brief checklist. The LD stated the ADM did a weekly kitchen inspection, and the CK/DM was in there daily, so they were primarily responsible for any issues with kitchen sanitation. The LD stated some of the checklist items were marked N/A because the facility was so small and old they did not have the items. The checklist she worked from had the following items listed that were applicable to the facility: -pot washing and dishwashing -food temperature log -no cross contamination during cooking -clean dishes air drying with no wet items in racks. The LD stated she did not routinely check the chemical dishwasher but left that up to the CK/DM, who needed to be ensuring it was done daily. The LD stated she would usually watch the CK/DM make the puree to make sure she was using the right thinner, but she had not noticed anything [NAME] with sanitation during purees. The LD stated the facility just had one small food processor and only one resident on a puree diet, so they did not cook food in big batches. The LD stated this made it difficult to measure the temperatures on the steam table. The LD stated she did not really know how to solve that problem, because the pureed foods did have to be maintained at the same 135 degrees as the other foods. The LD stated the food processor bowl should have been washed and sanitized in between dishes. The LD stated, since they prepared these foods in such small batches, they could not send the bowl through the dishwasher, but needed to wash it in soapy water by hands and sanitize in the approved sanitizing sink with a chlorine bleach component. The LD stated she did not know the protocol they had developed, but the food processor bowl needed to be washed and sanitized. The LD stated when the previous dietary manager left, the facility promoted the CK/DM while she was still working on her dietary manager certificate. The LD stated some of the instances of noncompliance in the kitchen were probably due to the CK/DM not having her full education as a food and nutrition services manager. The LD stated the CK/DM was not a certified dietary manager and had not worked more than two years as a food and nutrition services manager. The dietitian stated the potential result for all the identified failures in the kitchen could have been an outbreak of food-borne illness among the resident population. A copy of the most recent kitchen sanitation checklist was requested from the LD but not received prior to the end of survey. During an interview on 04/27/23 at 02:15 PM, the ADM stated he monitored the kitchen by conducting weekly kitchen inspections and documented them on a checklist. The ADM stated he had not observed any of the issues noted during his inspections. The ADM stated the CK/DM was not a certified dietary manager. He stated she had started the class to become certified, and prior to the ADM taking his position, the previous administrator had cut staff in the kitchen. The ADM stated that resulted in the CK/DM having to take over the kitchen. The ADM stated he had the CK/DM call the certification school the day prior, and she learned she would have to start the classes over again. The ADM stated the failures identified in the kitchen could result in food borne illness for the residents. The ADM stated he would provide his completed kitchen inspection sheets but had not provided them prior to exit. Review of facility's policy, titled Food Safety, and dated 08/01/20 did not include any policy related to holding temperatures, dishwasher operation, or cookware sanitization.
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0801 (Tag F0801)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutritio...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service for one of two kitchen staff (CK/DM) reviewed for sufficient staff. The dietary manager (CK/DM) at the facility did not have a dietary manager certificate. This failure placed residents at risk of unsatisfying food and food borne illness. Findings included: Observations on 04/25/23 at 9:30 AM, 04/25/23 at 11:04 AM, 04/26/23 at 12:40 PM, and 04/27/23 at 08:30 AM revealed CK/DM was working in the kitchen preparing the noon meal. DA D went in and out of the kitchen, retrieving and washing breakfast dishes. During an interview on 04/27/23 at 08:44 AM, the LD stated she did not work fuill time at the facility and only visited onsite once a month. The LD stated she was aware the CK/DM was not certified, and that the CK/DM had stepped into the dietary manager role when the previous dietary manager quit. During an interview on 04/27/23 at 01:52 PM, the CK/DM stated she had worked at the facility in the kitchen since 2017, and when the previous dietary manager quit, she took over the job of kitchen manager. The CK/DM stated she was the only daytime cook and acted as a dietary aide as well. She stated she was not certified, because she worked too much to finish the classes. She stated she was still planning to finish certification but had not been able to. The CK/DM stated the ADM had not provided any training for her about what to do in the kitchen, but the LD did provide some training. During an interview on 04/27/23 at 02:15 PM, the ADM stated he had not known until that day (04/27/23) the CK/DM was not a certified dietary manager. The ADM stated he had started in his position the week before Christmas (December 2022) and had not been told the CK/DM was still uncertified and had not asked. He stated the CK/DM had started the class to become certified, and prior to the ADM taking his position, the previous administrator had cut staff in the kitchen. The ADM stated that resulted in the CK/DM having to take over the kitchen. The ADM stated he had the CK/DM call the certification school the day prior (04/26/23), and she learned she would have to start the classes over again. The ADM stated failures identified in the kitchen could be related to the CK/DM not having her full education, and these could result in food borne illness for the residents. Policy on certified dietary manager was requested but not provided prior to exit.
Mar 2023 1 deficiency 1 IJ
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and devices to prevent ac...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents and supervision. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 eloped from the facility on 2/28//2023 and fractured his right hip, that required surgery to treat. Resident #1 was found 2 ½ blocks away from the facility on the ground, he had fallen and was unable to get up. This failure resulted in an identification of an (IJ) Immediate Jeopardy on 3/1/2023 at 6:06 p.m. The (IJ) Immediate Jeopardy template was provided to the ADM on 3/1/2023 at 6:06pm. While the (IJ) Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 3/3/2023 at 4:40 p.m., the facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of actual harm that was not Immediate Jeopardy and a scope of isolated because the facility was still monitoring the effectiveness of their Plan of Removal. This failure could place all residents that are elopement risk and refuse to wear a wander guard at risk for accidents, harm, and/or death. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 3/2/2023, reflected a 64- year- old man, admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 was diagnosed with Parkinson's disease (a disease of the central nervous system that affects movements), unspecified psychosis (inadequate information to make the diagnosis of a specific psychotic disorder) not due to a substance or known physiological condition, Insomnia ( a common sleep disorder that can make it hard to fall asleep), Paranoid schizophrenia ( a psychological disorder where the lines are blurred between what is real and what isn't), delusional disorder(a belief or altered reality that is persistently held despite evidence or agreement to the contrary) and heart failure (A chronic condition in which the heart doesn't pump blood as well as it should). Review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] reflected a BIMS score of 5 (indicates the resident does not have the cognitive ability to understand). The MDS also reflected Resident # 1 is ambulatory with no assistance. Review of MAR dated 2/1/2023-2/282023, reflected the following orders: Resident to reside on secure unit for personal safety - start 12/29/2020 open ended 9/1/2022- Resident may have trial integration off unit into general population- open ended 9/1/2022- May have wander guard -open ended Record review of Resident #1's care plan dated 2/28/2023, reflected the following: Problem: Resident has been observed to leave the grounds within the past week without notifying staff despite reminders. Interventions: Explain to resident the policy and procedure for leaving the facility and review periodically for continued need for secure placement. The care plan did not reflect any updates of interventions in place for Resident #1 for the period of 9/1/2022 when Resident #1 came off the secure unit through 2/28/2023. Record review of Risk elopement assessments for Resident #1 reflected the following: -12/19/2017 Resident #1 was identified as risk for elopement, -9/19/2021 was not an elopement risk, with no interventions, -11/15/2022 Resident #1 was not an elopement risk, with no interventions, -5/21/2022 reflected it was unknown if Resident # 1 was an elopement risk and to remain on secure unit for safety, and. -2/23/2023 reflected Resident #1 was not a risk for elopement with the following interventions: Frequent monitoring how often not noted, keep behavior logs, review medications, utilizations of sign in/sign out logs, recreational activities, and music. Record review of facility progress notes dated 6/2/2022- 2/28/2023 for Resident #1 reflected, no monitoring notes, no behavioral log, no sign in or out sheets used by Resident #1, or any notes regarding activities or music. There was one progress note dated 2/28/2023 regarding Resident #1's refusal to wear the wander guard. In an interview on 3/1/2023 at 11:10 a.m., the hospital staff reported Resident #1 was brought into the hospital by EMS. She stated it was reported Resident #1 was found on the street trying to get up. The hospital staff stated Resident # 1 had a fractured right hip and was scheduled for surgery later in the day. She stated Resident # 1 was hallucinating and having delusional thoughts since he was admitted . In an interview on 3/1/2023 with concerned citizen stated approximately 5:25am he and his son noticed Resident # 1 had fallen and was trying to get up. He stated they called 911 for assistance, he stated Resident #1 reported that he tripped over the curb and hurt his hip. In an interview on 3/1/2023 at 12:29 p.m., LE stated EMS contacted them to come to the scene on 3/1/2023 around 5:45 a.m., LE stated they spoke with Resident #1 he was able to tell them the facility he came from, that he had fallen and was unable to get up. LE reported, Resident #1 was transported to the hospital due to his injury he sustained from falling. LE stated they went to facility and asked if anyone was missing? LE reported the staff they spoke to was not aware that anyone was missing at the time, LE stated they informed the facility of Resident #1 name and advised that he was transported to the hospital for further medical treatment. Review of Police call for service report dated 2/28/2023, reflected the facility was notified at approximately 5:50am asking if they were missing anyone from the facility. LVN A, reported that she was not aware that anyone was missing at the time. LVN A was advised that Resident # 1 had been injured and was transported to the hospital. In an interview on 3/1/2023 at 10:02 a.m., LVN A stated she was the nurse on duty last night, she stated they work 12 hours shifts 6pm to 6am. She stated Resident #1 has insomnia and walked all night looking for cigarettes. She stated she last saw Resident #1 at approximately 5:10 a.m. walking down the hall, when she was going to check on another resident who had pushed their call light. She stated she was contacted by the local police department at about 5:45 a.m. asking if they were missing anyone. She stated she was not aware that Resident #1 was missing and stated he must have gone out one of the back doors that does not have alarms. She stated Resident #1 had never attempted to elope from the facility. LVN A stated Resident #1 was found 2 ½ blocks from the facility, stated he was headed to the post office to return some counterfeit money. LVN A stated when she looked, it appeared that she had some money missing from her purse she had behind the nurse's station. LVN A stated she immediately contacted the hospital so that she could provide any information they needed for Resident #1, she stated she then made all other notifications to the ADM, DON, and Resident #1's guardian. In an interview on 3/1/2023 at 11:19 a.m., Resident #1's Guardian stated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] on the secure unit due to being an elopement risk. She stated he had previous elopements at previous placements and had attempted from this facility. Resident #1's Guardian stated she was notified by the facility that the secure unit would be shut down. She stated the facility completed another risk assessment for elopement and indicated Resident #1 was no longer at risk for elopement. Resident #1's Guardian stated Resident #1 was very familiar with the back doors at facility, she stated he often would go out the door when she visited as he was able to go in and out the doors as he pleased. Resident #1's Guardian stated she believed the facility shut down the secure unit due to staffing and census issues. Resident #1's Guardian stated Resident #1 refused to wear the wander guard bracelet and was unaware of any other interventions in place. She stated she was not aware of Resident #1 trying to elope since he initially admitted . Resident #1's Guardian stated she was also concerned that the incident happened at 5:45 a.m., but she did not get contacted about the incident until sometime after 7:00 a.m. In an interview on 3/1/2023 at 1:30 p.m. the DON stated LVN A who was on duty that night, contacted her around 6:39 a.m. She stated LVN A reported that the police were just at the facility asking if they had a resident missing. The DON stated LVN A was not aware Resident #1 was missing at the time when she was contacted by the police. The DON stated she advised LVN A to make all notifications, she also stated that LVN A stated Resident #1 must have gone out one of the back doors because they do not lock or alarm. The DON stated none of the doors at the facility alarm when opened unless the resident has on a wander guard bracelet. The DON stated the other residents who are an elopement risk have on a wander guard bracelet and if they get within 10 feet of any of the doors the alarms will sound. The DON stated when she started at the facility in October 2022, Resident #1 was already off the secure unit, she stated he had never tried to elope before this time. The DON was asked about previous care plans and interventions for Resident #1 because he refused to wear the wander guard bracelet, she was not able to locate any documents. The DON was not able to locate any documentation regarding Resident #1's behaviors, monitoring of Resident #1, or any sign-in/or out sheets. In an interview on 3/1/2023 at 4:30 p.m., the ADM stated all residents who have been identified as elopement risk wear a wander guard bracelet, he stated Resident #1 refused to wear his wander guard. The ADM stated he was not aware that Resident #1 tried to elope from the facility in the past he stated it must have been before he started at the facility. The ADM stated all residents have the right to be safe and it is his expectation that all residents are safe in the facility. The ADM stated the alarms on the doors alarm if the resident was wearing a wander guard and they come within 10 feet of any of the doors. The ADM stated they opened back up the secure unit on 2/28/2023. Observation and test on 3/1/2023 of all doors in facility, reflected all doors are able to be opened without any alarms going off coming in or going out the doors. The door where staff believe Resident #1 went out leads out to the side parking lot on the south end of the building. The facility is located 2 blocks from an active railroad and busy street with blinking yellow light for traffic going through. Observation on 3/1/2023 at 3:30pm of secure unit with code required secured doors. Observed two residents residing on the secure unit and staff working on the unit. Reviewed facility Abuse/Neglect policy undated reflected: Neglect is the failure of the facility, its employees or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish or emotional distress. Reviewed facility Elopement Risk Assessment policy dated 11/01/2017 reflected the following: All residents are assessed on admission for elopement risk utilizing an elopement risk form. All residents are re-assessed for elopement potential by the MDS nurse /social worker or designee periodically throughout a resident's stay and with a significant change. Interventions will be added to the resident's care plan after analyzing the information obtained. The baseline care plan will identify if a resident is admitted as an elopement risk on admission. Reviewed QAPI - (Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement) held quarterly dated-September 2022- February 2023 to address elopement. An (IJ) Immediate Jeopardy was identified on 3/1/2023 at 6:06 p.m., due to the above failures. The ADM was notified on 3/1/2023. The ADM was provided with the (IJ) Immediate Jeopardy template on 3/1/2023 at 6:06pm, and a Plan of Removal (POR) was requested. A Plan of Removal was accepted on 3/3/2023 at 1:56 p.m. and reads as follows: Plan of Removal Immediate Plan of Removal Identified resident is not currently in the facility: Residents at risk of elopement have the potential to be affected. Elopement risk evaluations done in the past 90 days on current residents in facility reviewed by nursing managers for accuracy on 2/28/23. Any not completed in past 90 days or found to be inaccurate were completed by the Director of Nursing on 3/1/23. Identified residents at risk reviewed using the Elopement Risk Assessment for interventions on 2/28/23, by the Director of Nursing and any issues identified were corrected appropriately at the time of discovery. Care plans were updated to reflect the interventions by the Nurse Assessment Coordinator on 2/28/23. Licensed nurses will be re-educated on Abuse/Neglect, the elopement risk assessment process/accuracy and putting interventions in place based on the risks identified. This includes intervening if the resident verbalizes the desire to leave the facility or threatens to leave the facility or refuses to wear a wander guard. Licensed nurses will also be re-educated on documenting in progress notes, adding to the 24-hour report and updating care plans with changes of condition This education will be initiated on 2/28/23 by the Director of Nursing and completed by 3/2/23. The Director of Nursing will monitor for compliance. Any member of target audience not receiving by 3/2/23 will receive prior to next scheduled shift. This education will be presented in the new hire orientation and for any agency staff by the Director of Nursing/charge nurse. New admissions, readmissions and quarterly assessments will be reviewed in morning meeting beginning 3/2/23 Monday thru Friday as part of the clinical morning meeting process to review Elopement risks assessments for accuracy and interventions validated if indicated. The 24-hour report will be reviewed by the Director of Nursing/Assistant Director of Nursing for any documentation that may suggest a resident is expressing desires to leave the facility, if identified, interventions for safety will be implemented and care plan updated. The Medical Director was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 3/1/23. Ad Hoc QAPI was held by the administrator on 3/1/23 to discuss the contents of this plan. The administrator will oversee the compliance of this plan. Monitoring of Plan or Removal on 3/2/2023 was as follows: Interview on 3/2/2023 at 3:00 p.m., with hospital staff reported Resident #1 remains in the hospital in recovery from surgery. Hospital staff reported that Resident #1 has refused care by pulling out his picc line and still had delusional thoughts. Resident # 1 is scheduled to return to the facility once released from the hospital. Reviewed elopement risk assessments dated 3/1/2023 completed and updated for Resident #2 and Resident #3, reflected both are at risk for wandering, elopement risk, and will reside on secure unit for their safety and wear a wander guard bracelet. Observation conducted on 3/2/2023 at 3:30 p.m., of Resident #2 and Resident #3, on the secure unit. Resident #2 and Resident #3 appeared to be resting, they did not appear to be in any pain or distress. Resident # 2 and Resident # 3 was observed wearing their wander guard bracelets. In an interview on 3/2/2023 at 2:10 p.m., LVN B stated she completed the elopement drill and has been in-serviced on the policy, procedures and steps to take when there is a missing resident. LVN B stated she had also been in -serviced on abuse/ neglect, elopement, and documentation. She reported the ADM is the abuse/neglect coordinator. In an interview on 3/2/2023 at 2:20 p.m., LVN C stated she participated in the elopement drill today. She reported being in-serviced on abuse/neglect, elopement, and resident documentation. She stated she understood the process when they have a resident missing, she stated she contacts the ADM immediately if she suspected abuse/ neglect, and that she understood the importance of charting on residents. In an interview on 3/2/2023 at 2:30 p.m., LVN D stated she worked the morning of the incident. She stated she worked on 3/1/2023 from 6am to 6pm she was coming on shift when LE came to facility and asked LVN A if they had a resident missing. LVN D stated LVN A was not aware that Resident #1 was missing. She stated whenever, she worked the 6pm to 6am shift she knows she have to walk all night and check on Resident #1 because he walks all through the night. She stated when she worked, she would have to know where all her residents are at all times for safety of the residents. LVN D stated she had participated in the elopement drill at facility and knows that steps to take when they have a resident missing. She stated she had also been in-serviced on abuse/neglect and documentation. In an interview on 3/2/2023 at 2:40 p.m., CNA B stated she participated in the elopement drill today. CNA B stated they learned the code to call code white if they have a missing resident and they step to take to start the search process. She stated she had been trained on abuse/ neglect and documentation, she stated the ADM is the abuse/neglect coordinator and they needed to report immediately when they see or suspect abuse/neglect. In an interview on 3/2/2023 at 2:50 p.m. CNA C stated she participated in the elopement drill today. CNA C stated they learned the code to call code white if they have a missing resident and to start the search process. She stated she had been trained on abuse/ neglect and documentation, she stated the ADM is the abuse/neglect coordinator and they needed report immediately. In an interview on 3/2/2023 at 3:10 p.m., DON stated she and most of the staff have been trained on the elopement drill and what to do when they have a missing resident. She stated any staff that have not been trained are either PRN (as needed) staff or staff that only worked in the summer. DON stated the rest of the staff even agency staff as they come to work have been trained over the elopement process, abuse/neglect, and documentation. In an interview on 3/2/2023 at 3:20 p.m., the ADM stated all staff have been trained on the elopement process. He stated all staff participated in the elopement drill skills test on what to do if they have a missing resident. He stated it is his responsibility to ensure that all the residents in the facility are safe. ADM stated they are also looking at other ways to ensure the safety of the residents while maintain their independence. In an interview on 3/3/2023 at 3:40p.m., the ADM, stated on 3/1/2023 he verbally advised the MD of the IJ (Immediate Jeopardy) concerns identified. Record review of the AdHoc (for particular reason) QAPI(Quality assurance performance improvement) dated 3/1/2023 to address IJ(Immediate Jeopardy). Monitoring completed on 3/3/2023 as follows: Resident # 1 remains in hospital, Resident # 1 is scheduled to return to the facility once released from the hospital Observation made on 3/3/2023 at 4:10 p.m., of Resident # 2 and Resident # 3 on secure unit, no concerns noted during observation. Review of elopement assessments dated 2/28/2023, reflected all residents in facility were re-assessed for elopement risk. Two residents identified for secure unit /wander guard. These residents are currently on secure unit. Review of care plan dated 2/28/2023 for Resident #1 and Resident # 2 with current interventions: 1. Monitor for placement Q shift 2. Monitor for proper functioning 24 hours a day 3. Monitor resident in facility and document attempts to elope out of facility 4. Assess quarterly for continued use of wander guard 5. Explain to resident the policy and procedures for leaving the facility 6. Resident will reside on the secure unit for safety 7. Offer daily activities to address resident's interest 8. Review periodically for continued need for secure placement 3/3/2023 Review of in-services completed: all nursing staff verified completion except one PRN staff. 3/2/2023- Documentation Expectations 3/2/2023- Resident refusal of wander guard / immediate reporting to charge nurse 2/28/2023- Safety 2/28/2023- Elopement Drill / Policy and procedure 2/28/2023- Abuse/Neglect 2/28/2023- Elopement, Care plans, New admissions, elopement risk assessment and Quarterly assessments Record review of in-service sheet dated 2/28/2023 reflected 2 CNA's who work PRN had not completed the training. One nursing staff who only works in the summer had not received the training. In an interview on 3/3/2023 at 4:15pm with BOM (business office manager), stated they have not had any new admissions, readmissions. On 3/3/2023 at 4:40 p.m., the ADM was informed the (IJ)immediate Jeopardy was removed. However, the facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy and a scope of isolated due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
  • "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: 2 life-threatening violation(s), $48,392 in fines. Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 25 deficiencies on record, including 2 critical (life-threatening) violations. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
  • • $48,392 in fines. Higher than 94% of Texas facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
  • • Grade F (16/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: Trust Score of 16/100 indicates significant concerns. Thoroughly evaluate alternatives.

About This Facility

What is Bremond Nursing And Rehabilitation Center's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns Bremond Nursing and Rehabilitation Center an overall rating of 2 out of 5 stars, which is considered below average nationally. Within Texas, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.

How is Bremond Nursing And Rehabilitation Center Staffed?

CMS rates Bremond Nursing and Rehabilitation Center's staffing level at 3 out of 5 stars, which is average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 56%, which is 10 percentage points above the Texas average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs. RN turnover specifically is 60%, which is notably high. RNs provide skilled clinical oversight, so turnover in this role can affect medical care quality.

What Have Inspectors Found at Bremond Nursing And Rehabilitation Center?

State health inspectors documented 25 deficiencies at Bremond Nursing and Rehabilitation Center during 2023 to 2025. These included: 2 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death) and 23 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.

Who Owns and Operates Bremond Nursing And Rehabilitation Center?

Bremond Nursing and Rehabilitation Center is owned by a government entity. Government-operated facilities are typically run by state, county, or municipal agencies. The facility is operated by FUNDAMENTAL HEALTHCARE, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 82 certified beds and approximately 23 residents (about 28% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in Bremond, Texas.

How Does Bremond Nursing And Rehabilitation Center Compare to Other Texas Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Texas, Bremond Nursing and Rehabilitation Center's overall rating (2 stars) is below the state average of 2.8, staff turnover (56%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (2 stars) is below the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Bremond Nursing And Rehabilitation Center?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations and the facility's high staff turnover rate.

Is Bremond Nursing And Rehabilitation Center Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, Bremond Nursing and Rehabilitation Center has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 2 Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 2-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Texas. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.

Do Nurses at Bremond Nursing And Rehabilitation Center Stick Around?

Staff turnover at Bremond Nursing and Rehabilitation Center is high. At 56%, the facility is 10 percentage points above the Texas average of 46%. Registered Nurse turnover is particularly concerning at 60%. RNs handle complex medical decisions and coordinate care — frequent RN changes can directly impact care quality. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?

Was Bremond Nursing And Rehabilitation Center Ever Fined?

Bremond Nursing and Rehabilitation Center has been fined $48,392 across 2 penalty actions. The Texas average is $33,563. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.

Is Bremond Nursing And Rehabilitation Center on Any Federal Watch List?

Bremond Nursing and Rehabilitation Center is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.