CASS VALLEY HEALTHCARE CENTER

103 TEAKWOOD ST, CENTERVILLE, TX 75833 (903) 536-2596
For profit - Corporation 74 Beds NEXION HEALTH Data: November 2025 6 Immediate Jeopardy citations
Trust Grade
0/100
#433 of 1168 in TX
Last Inspection: August 2024

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Cass Valley Healthcare Center in Centerville, Texas, has a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns and poor overall performance. Ranking #433 out of 1,168 facilities in Texas places it in the top half, but it is the only nursing home in Leon County, meaning there are no local alternatives to compare with. The facility is improving, having reduced its issues from nine in 2024 to just one in 2025, but it still faces serious concerns, including $163,287 in fines, which is higher than 94% of Texas facilities, and a staffing turnover rate of 67%, well above the state average. Staffing is rated at 2 out of 5 stars, indicating below-average support, and there is less RN coverage than 87% of facilities in Texas, which could affect care quality. Recent inspections revealed critical issues, such as a failure to maintain proper infection control practices, leading to a risk of disease spread among residents, as well as incidents of physical abuse by staff, resulting in serious harm to residents. While the facility has some strengths, like a high rating for quality measures, these serious deficiencies raise significant concerns for families considering this home for their loved ones.

Trust Score
F
0/100
In Texas
#433/1168
Top 37%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Getting Better
9 → 1 violations
Staff Stability
⚠ Watch
67% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
Penalties
✓ Good
$163,287 in fines. Lower than most Texas facilities. Relatively clean record.
Skilled Nurses
⚠ Watch
Each resident gets only 19 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Texas. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
Violations
⚠ Watch
29 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★★★☆☆
3.0
Overall Rating
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Staff Levels
★★★★★
5.0
Care Quality
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2024: 9 issues
2025: 1 issues

The Good

  • 5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in quality measures, fire safety.

The Bad

3-Star Overall Rating

Near Texas average (2.8)

Meets federal standards, typical of most facilities

Staff Turnover: 67%

20pts above Texas avg (46%)

Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity

Federal Fines: $163,287

Well above median ($33,413)

Significant penalties indicating serious issues

Chain: NEXION HEALTH

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

Staff turnover is elevated (67%)

19 points above Texas average of 48%

The Ugly 29 deficiencies on record

6 life-threatening 1 actual harm
Jun 2025 1 deficiency 1 IJ
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure each residents' environment remained free of ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure each residents' environment remained free of accident hazards for one (Resident #1) of four residents reviewed for accidents and hazards. The facility failed to ensure CNA A did not unlock the wheels and move Resident #1's bed during peri care, causing Resident #1 to fall. This resulted in Resident #1 being sent to the hospital with fractures and lacerations. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) existed from 05/31/2025 - 06/02/2025. The IJ was determined to be at past noncompliance as the facility had implemented actions that corrected the deficient practice prior to the beginning of the investigation. This failure could result in residents experiencing accidents, injuries, and diminished quality of life. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 06/10/2025, reflected Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: history of falling ( person experienced past falls), muscle wasting and atrophy, not elsewhere classified (decrease in size and strength of muscle tissue), lack of coordination (the inability to smoothly and accurately control body movements), hypertensive heart disease without heart failure (the heart conditions caused by long-term high blood pressure- a condition where the force of blood against the artery walls is consistently too high, making the heart work harder to pump blood- that do not involve heart failure). Review of Resident #1's MDS Assessment, dated 05/28/2025, reflected Resident #1 was unable to complete brief interview for mental status. Resident #1 had poor short- and long-term memory recall. Her decision-making ability was severely impaired. She was dependent on staff for the following: eating, oral hygiene, toileting hygiene, showers, upper and lower dressing, personal hygiene, and transfers. She was incontinent of bowel and bladder. Review of Resident #1's Comprehensive Care Plan, revision date of 05/31/2025, reflected Resident #1 had an actual fall. Interventions: Bed mobility and toileting use two person assist. Inservice staff on amount of assist needed and update Kardex. Continue interventions on the at-risk plan. Monitor/document/report as needed to MD for signs and symptoms of pain, bruises, and change of mental status. New Onset of the following: confusion, sleepiness, inability to maintain posture, and agitation. Resident #1 had an ADL self-care performance deficit. She was dependent on staff for bed mobility, eating, toileting, oral hygiene, showers, dressing (upper and lower body), personal hygiene, and transfers. Review of Resident #1's hospital records, dated 05/31/2025, reflected Resident #1 was transferred to the emergency room at local hospital on [DATE]. She had x-rays and was assessed by medical doctors. Resident #1 was discharged back to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of right anterior superior iliac spine fracture (a break in the bony projection on the front and upper part of the right hip bone), forehead laceration (a jagged or irregular tear or cut in the skin or other soft body tissue), right elbow soft tissue foreign body (refers to the presence of an object, like a splinter, thorn or, metal, that has entered the skin and become embedded in the soft tissues) and right pulmonary nodule (a small, discrete spot or growth in the right lung that appears denser than the surrounding lung tissue). Review of written statement by CNA A reflected on 05/31/2025 at 9:50 AM, Resident #1 was lying in bed receiving peri care from CNA A. There was a lot of loose BM everywhere on the bed. CNA A began to provide peri-care to Resident #1. CNA A had cleaned Resident #1 on one side and needed to be on the side of the bed located against the wall. CNA A moved the bed away from the wall to have easy access to Resident #1. When CNA A was moving the bed, Resident #1 fell off the bed. CNA A confirmed there was loose stool on the alternating air mattress causing the air mattress to be slick. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) existed from 05/31/2025-06/02/2025. The IJ was determined to be at past noncompliance as the facility had implemented the following actions prior to investigation start: Review of facility's Inservice records, dated 05/31/2025, reflected all nursing staff received in-services on abuse/neglect policies and fall with injury protocol. Review of the facility's accident hazards/supervision devices quiz, completed on 05/31/2025 and was ongoing, reflected all nursing staff completed this quiz and passed. Review of the facility's safe peri care and bed mobility for high-risk resident's quiz, completed on 05/31/2025, reflected all nursing staff had completed the quiz and passed. Review of the facility's interviews with interviewable residents, dated 06/01/2025, reflected 9 residents had received care from CNA A and they all knew CNA A. The following was asked of the residents: 1. Do you know CNA A- Yes 2. Do you know who to report to if you had problems with any staff? - Yes. 3. Has CNA A provided you with care- Yes. 4. Do you feel safe when CNA A provided care for you? Yes 5. Do you feel safe at this facility? Yes Review of the facility's skin assessments, on 06/10/2025, of all Residents after the incident on 05/31/2025. There were no new skin concerns. Review of the facility's maintenance records, on 06/10/2025, reflected all beds were checked for any issues such as locking the bed or any malfunction of the beds. There were no concerns of all Residents beds. Review of Resident #1's medical records, on 06/10/2025, reflected Resident #1 was being monitored for signs of pain post-incident. There was no concerns of pain. Review of Resident #1's Kardex, on 06/10/2025, reflected peri care assistance was added to her Kardex on 05/30/2025. Review of the facility's investigation, on 06/10/2025, reflected all residents Kardex was updated on 05/30/2025 to reflect peri-care assistance. Review of CNA A's personnel record, on 06/10/2025, reflected she was suspended on 05/31/2025 until investigation was completed. CNA A returned to work on 06/06/2025. CNA A's misconduct was up to date and no concerns noted. Observation on 06/10/2025 at 9:05 AM, Resident #1 was lying in bed. She was not interviewable. Resident #1 was lying in bed. She was in a fetal position facing the wall. She made eye contact and did mumble. Resident did not exhibit signs of being in pain such as: grimacing, tense body posture, restlessness, moaning, etc. Resident #1's bed was in lowest position. Interview on 06/10/2025 at 9:18 AM, CNA B stated she did receive in-service on abuse and neglect within the past 2 weeks. She stated she did not recall the exact date. She stated examples of abuse was yelling at a resident, hitting a resident, or can be sexual abuse. CNA B stated neglect was when staff refused to give resident food, water and/or assist resident to the bathroom. CNA B stated she had been in-service on fall protocol. She stated never move a resident when they fall. She stated a nurse was required to assess the resident and give instructions to the CNA after she completed her assessment. CNA B stated she did take a quiz on falls and peri care. She stated she was reminded if a resident was a one person assist, to always ask for assistance if there was a safety issue. CNA B stated staff was never to move a bed during peri-care. She stated if a bed needed to be move this was expected to be completed prior to beginning peri-care and to ask another staff for assistance. CNA B stated peri care assistance was not on the Kardex until after the incident with Resident #1. Interview on 06/10/2205 at 9:40 AM, CNA C stated she had received in-service on abuse and neglect, fall protocol, and peri care end of May. She stated she did not recall the exact date; however, it was the last weekend of May 2025. She stated the following was types of neglect: refusing to give resident a shower, feeding a resident, give resident water, etc. CNA C stated abuse was when someone hit, cussed, or yelled at a resident. She stated she did take quizzes on falls and peri care. She stated she was a new CNA and she learned to always ask for assistance with a resident required one person assist, if there was any safety concerns. She stated she would never move a bed during peri-care. She stated if a bed needs to be moved to reach one side of the resident, the bed was expected to be moved prior to peri-care and it was always in good practice to have two staff in the room when moving a bed. CNA C stated assistance with peri-care was not on the Kardex until after the incident with Resident #1. Interview on 06/10/2025 at 10:58 AM, CNA D stated she was walking by Resident #1's room and opened the door to check on Resident #1. She stated CNA A was giving peri-care to Resident #1. CNA D stated Resident #1 was on her right side while lying in bed. She stated she exited the room and did not witness Resident #1 fall. She stated she was given quizzes on pericare and falls. CNA D stated she had been in-service on fall protocol and abuse/neglect. She stated abuse was when a staff kicked or yelled at a resident. She stated touching resident in private areas was also considered abuse. CNA D stated neglect was not changing a resident brief, not giving resident food, or not assisting a resident to the bathroom. She stated if a resident fell or was found on the floor only the nurse was trained to assess the resident. She stated the CNA was not to move the resident until the nurse completed all her assessments and gave directions to the CNA of what to do after the assessments. She stated when giving peri care the bed was to remain locked. She stated during the in-service the DON explained if a staff needed assistance for the staff to use call light and walkie talkies would be provided to the staff to use whenever they may need assistance with a resident. CNA D stated if a resident is a one person assist and a staff felt the resident may need more than one person the staff was expected to call for assistance. She stated peri care assistance was not on the Kardex prior to the incident with Resident #1. She stated after the incident with Resident #1 peri care assistance was on all residents Kardex. Interview on 06/10/2025 at 10:35 AM, CNA A stated she began peri-care and cleaning Resident #1 on 05/30/2025 around 9:30 AM. She stated there was a lot of feces and some of it was loose stools. She stated feces were all over the bed. CNA A stated Resident #1 was lying on her back. She stated she needed to be on the right side of Resident #1 to finish cleaning the feces off Resident #1. She stated she rolled Resident #1 to the right side of the bed facing the wall. CNA A stated after she rolled Resident #1 to the right side she walked to the end of the bed and unlocked the bed. CNA A stated she began to move the bed away from the wall and this is when Resident #1 fell off the bed. She stated Resident #1 fell between the bed and the wall. CNA A stated she was at the end of the bed and attempted to catch Resident #1 prior to her falling. CNA A stated she was trained not to move the bed during peri-care. She stated the training was prior to the incident, however, she did not recall the date. CNA A stated she was required to unlock the bed prior to peri care and ask for assistance if there was any issues with giving peri-care. CNA A stated Resident #1 peri care was not on the Kardex. She stated she had given care to Resident #1 several times and she was a one person assist with peri-care. She stated she did ask a nurse a few months ago and this was the nurse's instructions of peri care on Resident #1 being 1 person assist. CNA A did not recall the name of the nurse or the date she questioned Resident #1's peri care. She stated she was in-service on peri-care, fall protocol, abuse, and neglect, prior to her returning from her suspension. CNA A stated neglect was when a staff refused to change a resident dirty brief, refused to feed a resident, refused to give resident water, etc. She stated slapping, yelling, or cussing a resident was abuse. CNA A stated she learned to always ask for assistance when needing to move a bed and never to move a bed during peri-care. She stated only move a bed prior to peri-care and ensure another staff was in the room for any assistance. CNA A stated she was the only witness to the fall of Resident #1. Interview on 06/10/2025 at 2:17 PM, the Director of Nurses stated her expectations for peri care was for each CNA to gather their supplies before they enter a resident's room. She stated the CNAs were expected to position the resident in bed according to what type of peri-care is needed. The Director of Nurses stated the staff may raise the bed to the height level of the staff to provide peri-care. She sated the CNAs were expected to follow PPE guidance during peri-care. The Director of Nurses stated if the staff needed to unlock the bed, the CNA was expected to ensure the resident was stable in the bed. She stated the bed was to be moved prior to giving peri care and it was safe practice to have two staff in the room when moving a bed as a precaution. The Director of Nurses stated one staff would be on the left side of the bed and the other staff would be on the right side of the bed. She stated moving a bed when staff was at the foot of the bed was not best practice. She stated CNA A did not follow the correct protocol when moving the bed. The Director of Nurses stated CNA A was not to move the bed when standing at the foot of the bed and during peri-care. She stated the facility had purchased walkie-talkies for all staff to use when they may need assistance. The Director or Nurses stated she expected the walkie-talkies to be always with the staff and to use them when they are needing assistance with anything related to a resident care. She stated random checks was being completed with CNA A and the other CNAs during peri-care. The Director of Nurses stated the training and in servicing was ongoing. She stated they were beginning unannounced abuse drills, and this would be follow-up in QAPI. Interview on 06/10/2025 at 3:02 PM, the Administrator stated her expectations for peri-care was for staff to ask for assistance, if there was any question about safety concerns. She stated the bed was required to be locked during peri-care. The Administrator stated CNA A was not to move Resident #1's bed during peri-care. She stated if Resident #1's bed needed to be moved, CNA A was expected to move it prior to beginning peri-care. She stated moving Resident #1's bed when CNA A was standing at the end of the bed may have contributed to Resident #1's fall. The Administrator stated the facility's investigation was inconclusive. Facility Policy on Perineal Care, revised 04/16/2024, reflected The Purposes of this procedure are to provide cleanliness and comfort to the resident, to prevent infections and skin irritations, and to observe the resident's skin condition. Preparation: 1. Review the resident's care plan to assess for any special needs of the resident. 2. Assemble the equipment and supplies as needed. (note: Enhanced Barrier Precautions would be used during peri care if resident has any qualifying condition). Equipment and Supplies The following equipment and supplies will be necessary when performing this procedure: 1. Wash basin. 2. Towels 3. Washcloth 4. Soap (or other authorized cleansing agent) or cleaning wipes and 5. Trash bag and personal protective equipment (gowns, gloves, mask, etc., as needed) Steps in the Procedure 1. Place the equipment on the beside stand. Arrange the supplies so they can be easily reached. 2. Explain the procedure to resident. 3. Provide privacy. 4. Wash hands and apply gloves. Toilet resident if on the toileting program and or remove brief. 5. Place bed protector under resident's buttocks. 6. Position resident with legs apart (if possible) avoid unnecessary exposure. Use wet washcloth/ cleaning wipes and apply soap/peri wash. For a Female resident: a. Wet washcloth and apply soap or skin cleansing agent. b. Wash perineal area (between the anus and the vagina), wiping from front to back. (1) Separate labia (the fleshy folds of skin that make up the external female genitalia) and wash area downward from front to back (Note: if the resident has an indwelling catheter, gently wash the juncture tubing from the urethra (the tube that lets urine leave your bladder) down the catheter about three inches. Gently rinse and dry the area.) (2) Continue to wash the perineum moving from inside outward to the thighs. Rinse perineum thoroughly in the same directions, using fresh water and a clean washcloth. (3) Gently Dry perineum. c. Ask the resident to turn on her side with her top leg slightly bent, if able. d. Rinse wash cloth and apply soap or skin cleansing agent. e. Wash the rectal area thoroughly, wiping from the base of the labia towards and extending over the buttocks. f. Rinse and dry thoroughly. Facility Policy on Fall Prevention Program, reviewed on 06/10/2024, reflected a fall can be defined as: when a resident is found on the floor; a resident slides to the floor unassisted; a resident rolls off the bed/chair onto the floor, including bedside mat; and a resident fall off any apparatus/equipment used for transfers.
Dec 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0624 (Tag F0624)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide and document sufficient preparation and orientation to res...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide and document sufficient preparation and orientation to residents to ensure safe and orderly transfer or discharge from the facility for one (1) of one resident reviewed for transfer and discharge rights. (Resident #1) The facility failed to make arrangements for a safe discharge for Resident #1. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving care and services to meet their needs upon discharge. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's Face Sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted [DATE] with diagnoses of unspecified systolic congestive heart failure (the left ventricle loses its ability to contract normally. The heart can't pump with enough force to push enough blood into circulation), essential primary hypertension (abnormally high blood pressure that not caused by a medical condition), major depressive disorder (persistent low mood and loss of interest in activities that people enjoy), and insomnia (a sleep disorder that makes it hard to fall asleep, stay asleep, or get quality sleep). Review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] reflected a BIMS score of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment. Resident #1 required set up or clean up assistance in the areas of eating, oral hygiene, upper body dressing, and personal hygiene, Resident #1 required partial/moderate assistance in the areas of lower body dressing and shower/bathe self. Resident #1 required substantial/maximal assistance in the areas of toileting hygiene and putting on/taking off footwear. Review of Resident #1's care plan dated 12/10/24, revealed Resident #1 was care planned for the following: Resident #1 wished to be discharged to an apartment. Review of Resident #1's 30-day discharge letter dated 10/09/24, revealed Resident #1 was given the 30-day discharge letter on the same date (10/09/24) he was discharged to the psych facility. Review of Resident #1's Interdisciplinary Discharge Summary date 10/11/24, revealed Resident #1 was sent to the psychiatric facility for evaluation and treatment. During an interview on 12/10/24 at 1:20 p.m., the SW stated that the resident was having several behaviors such as putting the remote to the tv in his pants, threatening other residents, and forced his roommate to watch gay porn. The SW stated Resident #1's former roommate was discharged from the facility as well but provided the investigator his face sheet with a phone number attached. The SW stated that the facility got an Application for Emergency Apprehension and Detention warrant for Resident #1 to be seen at a psychiatric facility. The SW stated that Resident #1 was given his 30-day discharge notice on 10/09/24 with a discharge date of 11/09/24. SW stated Resident #1 discharged from the psychiatric facility to another facility on 10/30/24. The SW stated that she nor anyone else was involved in the process of assisting with finding a new facility for Resident #1 once he left the psychiatric facility. During an interview on 12/10/24 at 2:35 p.m., the BOM stated that she was not involved in the transfer process when Resident #1 was sent to the psychiatric facility. The BOM stated Resident #1 was aware that he was going to the psychiatric facility on 10/09/24. The BOM stated that she gave Resident #1 his 30-day discharge letter on 10/09/24 with a discharge date of 11/09/24. The BOM stated that she thought that the SW, the DON, and the ADM had placement for Resident #1 once he was discharged from the psychiatric facility. During an interview on 12/10/24 at 4:00 p.m., Resident #1 stated that he was doing fine and was safe at his new facility. Resident #1 stated that the psychiatric facility referred him to the new facility. Resident #1 stated that he was very happy and pleased at his new facility and expected to get his own apartment after discharge. During an interview on 12/10/24 at 4:30 p.m., the DON stated she was not working at the facility at the time of the incident. The DON stated that the facility should have coordinated a transfer for Resident #1 due to him coming from their facility. The DON stated that she was not sure who was responsible to assist with coordinating a safe transfer due to her being new at the facility. The DON stated the failure could affect the resident by not having a safe place to discharge after discharging from the psychiatric facility. During an interview on 12/10/24 at 4:55 p.m., the ADM stated that Resident #1 was sent to the psychiatric facility on her first day working at the facility. The ADM stated that she thought the facility and coordinated a facility for Resident #1 to go to after he left the psychiatric facility. The ADM stated she was not involved in the discharge process for Resident #1. The ADM stated that IDT team was responsible for discussing the needs to ensure a safe discharge/transfer occurs and the SW was responsible for coordination with the psychiatric facility about finding a new placement for the resident. The ADM stated the failure could have affect the resident by not having a safe discharge. Review of facility's Transfer or Discharge Notice policy dated Revised January 2023 reflected Residents and/or representatives are notified in writing, and in a language and format they understand, at least (30) days prior to a transfer or discharge. Policy, Interpretation, and Implementation 1. Transfers and discharge includes movement of a resident from a certified bed in the facility to a non-certified bed in another part of the facility, or to a non certified bed outside the facility. Transfer and discharge does not refer to movement to a bed within the same certified facility, Specifically: a. Transfer refers to the movement of a resident from a bed in one certified facility to a bed in another certified facility when the resident expects to return to the original facility; and b. Discharge refers to the movement of a resident from a bed in one certified facility to a bed in another certified facility or other location in the community, when return to the original facility is not expected. 3. Except as specified below, the resident and his or her representative are given a thirty (30) days advance written notice of the impending transfer or discharge from this facility. 4. Under the following circumstances, the notice is given as soon as is it practicable but before the transfer or discharge: a. The safety of individuals in the facility would be endangered; b. The health of individuals in the facility would be endangered; c. The resident's health improves sufficiently to allow a more immediate transfer or discharge; d. An immediate transfer or discharge is required by the resident's urgent medical needs; e. The resident has not resided in the facility for thirty (30) days.
Sept 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0584)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike envi...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for a clean and homelike environment. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's urinal was emptied appropriately on 09/04/24. This failure placed residents at risk of decreased feelings of self-worth and a diminished quality of life. Findings included: A record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 09/04/24 reflected a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1's diagnoses included personal history of traumatic brain injury (someone who had a previous traumatic brain injury), muscle wasting and atrophy (loss of muscle tissue), major depressive disorder (persistent low mood and loss of interest in activities that people enjoy), epileptic seizures (a sudden burst of electrical activity in the brain that cause symptoms such as jerking and shaking), primary essential hypertension (high blood pressure that doesn't have a known secondary cause), and muscle weakness (loss of muscle strength). A record review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 08/12/24, reflected Resident #1 had a BIMS score of 13, which indicated cognitively intact. Resident #1's Quarterly MDS Section GG Functional Abilities and Goals reflected that Resident #1 required substantial/maximal assistance in the area of toileting hygiene and partial moderate assistance in the areas of eating, oral hygiene, upper body dressing, lower body dressing, putting on/taking off footwear, and personal hygiene. A record review of Resident #1's care plan, dated 09/04/24, reflected Resident #1 was care planned for ADL self-care performance deficit r/t disease process TBI, limited physical mobility r/t TBI, and impaired cognitive function/dementia or impaired thought process r/t neurological symptoms. During an observation on 09/04/24 at 9:20am, Resident #1's urinal had yellowish liquid in it that appeared to be urine. During an observation on 09/04/24 at 11:28am, Resident #1's urinal appeared to have yellowish liquid in it that appeared to be urine. During an observation on 09/04/24 at 1248pm, Resident #1's urinal appeared to have yellowish liquid in it that appeared to be urine. During an observation on 09/04/24 at 2:42pm, Resident #1's urinal appeared to have yellowish liquid in it that appeared to be urine. During an interview on 09/04/24 at 9:20am, Resident #1 stated that the urinal had been on his nightstand for a long time. Resident #1 stated the CNAs only empty his urinal during the night shift. Resident #1 stated that his urinal was not emptied the night before. During an interview on 09/04/23 at 1:00pm, LVN A stated that CNAs should make rounds at least every two hours. LVN A stated that CNAs should be looking to see if a resident needs assistance, ensuring call lights were within reach, and making sure all residents were comfortable. LVN A stated that it's anyone's responsibility that walked into the resident's room to ensure that the urinal was emptied appropriately. LVN A stated that if a resident's urinal was not emptied appropriately then that would be a resident's rights issue, the resident's room would have a foul smell, or the resident could knock over the urinal creating a slippery floor. During an interview on 09/04/23 at 3:30pm, the DON stated that CNAs should ensure that the resident's urinals have been emptied when rounds were made. The DON stated anyone who entered the resident's room should ensure the resident's urinal was emptied appropriately. The DON stated if a resident's urinal was not emptied appropriately that would be a resident's right violation, and an infection control issue. During an interview on 09/04/23 at 4:00pm, the ADM stated that CNAs should ensure that the resident's urinals have been emptied when rounds were made. The ADM stated anyone who entered the resident's room should ensure the resident's urinal was emptied appropriately. The ADM stated if a resident's urinal was not emptied appropriately that would be a resident's right violation, there would be an odor from the urinal, and an infection control issue. Review of the facility's Bedpan/Urinal, Offering/Removing policy, revised February 2018, reflected, Purpose: The purpose of the procedure is to provide the resident with bedpan and/or a urinal assistance. Preparation 1. Review the resident's care plan to assess for any special needs of the resident. 2. Assemble the equipment and supplies as needed. General Guidelines 1. Check to see if the resident is on intake and output before discarding the urine and feces. 2. Do not allow the resident to sit on a bedpan for extended periods. This is not only uncomfortable to the resident, it also causes skin breakdown. 3. If the resident prefers to keep a urinal at his bedside, check if frequently. Empty and clean it as necessary.
Aug 2024 7 deficiencies 1 IJ
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for 1 (Resident...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for 1 (Resident #22) of 4 residents reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to prevent physical abuse against Resident #22 by CNA H as seen on video surveillance. The noncompliance was identified as PNC IJ. The IJ began on 07/04/2024 and ended on 07/05/2024. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. This failure placed the resident at risk of physical and psychological harm. Findings include: Observation of Resident #22's video surveillance revealed CNA H assaulting the resident on three occasions during the 6:00 PM to 6:00 AM shift on 07/04/2024. The video captured CNA H striking Resident #22 with an open hand and the strikes were clearly heard on the audio. Due to the angle of the camera, it was difficult to identify where exactly on his body Resident #22 was slapped, but it appeared to be on the right arm and the backside. No observable reaction was noted by Resident #22 in the videos. Review of Resident #22's face sheet reflected a [AGE] year old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and again on 12/22/2023 with diagnoses of Peripheral Vascular Disease (A circulatory condition in which narrowed blood vessels reduce blood flow to the limbs), Alzheimer's disease (a progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions), Cognitive Communication Deficit (may have trouble reasoning and making decision while communicating, have trouble responding in an appropriate manner), and Amnesia (memory loss). Review of Resident #22's comprehensive MDS, dated [DATE], reflected resident was rarely or never able to understand verbal communication, cognitive skills for daily decision making were severely impaired and the resident was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. Review of Resident #22's Care Plan, revised 06/12/2024, reflected resident had an electronic monitoring device in his room with consent signed, resident was moved to memory care wing, resident required staff assistance for meeting emotional, intellectual, physical and social needs related to dementia. Care Plan also reflected resident had potential to be physically aggressive with staff and would hit staff during incontinence brief change. Interventions included in-service staff on Abuse Prohibition Policy, analyze times of day, places, circumstances, triggers and what de-escalates behavior and document, and provide physical and verbal cues to alleviate anxiety. In an interview on 08/20/204 at 2:20 PM, the ADON stated the for Resident #22 came to the facility and showed the DON the video of CNA H abusing Resident #22. She stated CNA H was employed by the Staffing agency. She stated the facility agreed it was abuse and law enforcement put out a warrant for CNA H's arrest. In an interview on 08/21/2024 at 10:45 AM, Resident #22's RP (FM 1) stated that himself or FM 2 monitored the video surveillance camera in Resident #22's room daily. FM 1 stated the evening of the incident 07/04/2024 FM 2 reviewed the video and observed CNA H being rough and slapping the resident. FM 2 went to the facility and showed the DON the video. FM1 stated the DON at the time called in the incident to the state and FM 2 met with the sheriff's office and filed a report. FM 1 stated he believed the suspect had been arrested. He stated there was a lot of turnover with the administrator and DON but he felt the facility handled the investigation well. FM 1 stated he did not notice a change in Resident #22's behavior follwing the incident. Observations and interviews with Resident #4, Resident #6, and Resident #21 revealed none had concerns with abuse and all felt safe at the facility. Interviews with direct care staff revealed all were knowledgeable of abuse prohibition policy. In an interview 08/22/2024 at 3:51 PM, CNA C stated she received abuse training several times a year. She stated if she witnessed abuse she would report it to the administrator. In an interview on 08/22/2024 at 4:10 PM, LVN A stated she was trained on abuse in July. She stated if she witnessed abuse she would report it to the administrator immediately. In an interview on 08/22/2024 at 5:30 PM, the interim DON stated the staff are trained on Abuse Prohibition Policy annually and as needed. She stated that staff are screened for history of abuse before hire. In an interview on 08/22/2024 at 5:50 PM, the Administrator stated staff are trained on Abuse Prohibition Policy annually and after every reportable event. She stated they run abuse/neglect registry checks before hire for all new staff. Attempted interview with CNA H with no return communication. The Administrator and DON at the time of the incident are no longer employed at the facility. Review of reports received from the Staffing Agency reflected a background check was completed for CNA H on 03/13/2024, with clear status. Records also reflected CNA H was deactivated from the Staffing Agency platform as of 07/06/2024 and her account had been permanently disabled. Review of the facility investigation, dated 07/12/2024, reflected the Administrator at the time took the appropriate actions to ensure the safety of the residents after the incident and provided education for the staff. Behavior monitoring was conducted for all residents on the memory care unit for 72 hours, weekly random check-offs were implemented for staff members providing direct care, and Abuse/Neglect in-service and drills were conducted. The report further reflected CNA H was immediately, on 07/05/2024, reported to the Staffing Agency and taken off the facility schedule. A skin assessment was completed on Resident #22 and all other residents that received care from CNA H with no issues/injuries noted. Per facility report, Resident #22 continued same meal intake, sleep pattern and no increased behaviors following the incident. CNA H only worked that one shift at the facility and has been banned from working at any company facility. Facility investigation report reflected 5 direct care staff completed an abuse questionnaire on 07/11/2024, abuse drill evaluations were completed as well as an in-service on abuse policy. Review of the questionnaire reflected staff were aware of how and when to report abuse to the Abuse Prohibition Coordinator (Administrator). The abuse policy in-service, dated 07/05/2024, was signed by 49 employees. Review of the police report, dated 07/08/2024, reflected CNA H intentionally and knowingly caused physical contact with Resident #22, by striking the resident several times with an open hand and should have believed that the resident would regard the contact as offensive or provocative. Review of facility Abuse Prohibition Policy, dated 05/17/2024, reflected physical abuse defined as . slapping . and controlling behavior through corporal punishment. The policy reflected the facility would investigate alleged abuse and provide notification of information to the proper authorities according to state and federal regulations. It also reflected employees will receive training and reinforcement on all aspects of abuse program at the time of initial orientation, annually and through ongoing in -services. The noncompliance was identified as PNC IJ. The IJ began on 07/04/2024 and ended on 07/05/2024. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0558 (Tag F0558)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the communication system which allows resident...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the communication system which allows residents to call for staff assistance was within reach for 5 (Resident #4, Resident # 21, Resident # 31, Resident #26, and Resident #20) out of 17 residents reviewed for call system placement. The facility failed to ensure Resident #4, Resident #21, Resident #31, Resident #26 and Resident #20's call light was within reach. The failure could place residents at risk for being unable to call for assistance from staff. Findings include: Review of Resident #4's face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of hemiplegia (paralysis or severe weakness in one side of the body) and cerebral infarction (stroke). Review of Resident #4's Optional MDS, dated [DATE], reflected a BIMS score of 11 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. MDS further reflected resident required substantial assistance with sitting on side of bed and transferring to the toilet. Review of Resident #4's Care Plan, dated 05/13/2024, reflected resident requires staff assistance for meeting needs. Care plan reflected resident had an ADL self-care performance deficit and required extensive 2-person transfer and dependence for toileting needs. Interventions included to encourage resident to use call bell to call for assistance. Observation and interview on 08/20/2024 at 09:15 AM, revealed Resident #4 lying in bed by the window with the call bell hanging from the back wall out of the resident's reach. Resident #4 stated he did not know where the call bell was and shrugged his shoulders when asked further questions. 2. Review of Resident #21 face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of bipolar disorder (a disorder associated with episodes of mood swings ranging from depressive lows to manic highs), personal history of traumatic brain injury (brain dysfunction caused by an outside force, usually a violent blow to the head), an anxiety disorder (feelings of worry, anxiety or fear). Review of Resident #21's MDS, dated [DATE], reflected a BIMS score of 13 indicating resident was cognitively intact. MDS further reflected resident required moderate assistance with eating and substantial assistance with toileting. Review of Resident #21's Care Plan, dated 05/13/2024, reflected resident had an ADL self-care performance deficit and required assistance with transfers, eating and toileting. Interventions included to encourage resident to use call bell to call for assistance. Observation and interview on 08/20/2024 at 09:45 AM, revealed Resident #21 sitting in wheelchair alone in his room with call bell hanging against back wall and behind furniture. Resident #21 stated he did not know where the call bell was and that he never uses it. He stated he goes out of the room to get someone if he needs something. 3. Review of Resident #31's face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with readmission on [DATE] with diagnoses of nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage (bleeding in the brain that occurs without surgery or trauma), encephalopathy (brain disease that alters brain function), hemiplegia and hemiparesis (weakness and paralysis on one side of the body). Review of Resident #31's MDS, dated [DATE], reflected a BIMS score of 03 indicating severe cognitive impairment. MDS reflected resident was dependent on staff for toileting and hygiene needs. Review of Resident #31's care plan, dated 07/08/2024, reflected resident had an ADL self-care performance deficit and required assistance with transfers, eating and toileting. Interventions included to encourage resident to use call bell to call for assistance. Observation and interview on 08/20/2024 at 10:00 AM, revealed Resident #31 alone in the room, lying in bed with the call bell draped across the chair on the other side of the room. Resident # 31 was difficult to understand but stated he did not know about his call bell. 4. Review of Resident #26's face sheet reflected an [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of metabolic encephalopathy (brain dysfunction caused by a chemical imbalance in the blood from an underlying condition that affects metabolism), Alzheimer's disease (progressive disease that destroys memory and other mental functions), and transient cerebral ischemic attack (mini stroke). Review of Resident #26's MDS, dated [DATE], reflected a BIMS of 10 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. MDS indicated resident required moderate assistance with toileting and showering. Review of Resident #26's Care Plan, dated 07/09/2024, reflected resident had an ADL self-care performance deficit and required assistance with transfers, eating and toileting. Interventions included to encourage resident to use call bell to call for assistance. Observation and interview on 08/20/2024 at 10:15 AM, revealed Resident # 26 alone in room lying in bed by the window with the call bell across the room out of reach. Resident #26 stated he never has a call bell where he can reach it. 5. Review of Resident #20's face sheet reflected an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (progressive disease that destroys memory and other mental functions), Bipolar disorder (a disorder associated with episodes of mood swings ranging from depressive lows to manic highs), and Dementia (impairment of brain functions such as memory loss and judgement). Review of Resident #20's MDS, dated [DATE], reflected a BIMS of 04 indicating severe cognitive impairment. MDS reflected resident required supervision with toileting and shower. Review of Resident #20's Care Plan, dated 06/09/2024 reflected resident had an ADL self-care performance deficit and required assistance with toileting and supervision/setup with eating and transfers. Interventions included to encourage resident to use call bell to call for assistance. Observation on 08/2024 at 11:00 AM, revealed Resident #20 resting in bed with her call bell out of reach, hanging from back wall onto the floor. Resident was not interviewable. In an interview on 08/22/2024 at 3:51 PM, CNA C stated it was the nursing staff's responsibility to ensure the residents call bell was within reach or it could place the resident at risk for falls. She stated the nurses at the nurses station would only be able to hear some of the residents if they were to cry out for help. In an interview on 08/22/2024 at 4:10 PM, LVN A stated it was everyone's responsibility to ensure the call bells are within the residents reach and to tell the residents to call if they need anything. She stated a resident could fall while trying to get up and reach the call bell. She stated the nurses at the nurse station would only be able to hear some residents if they were to holler for help. In an interview on 08/22/2024 at 5:30 PM, Interim DON stated the call bells should be within reach at all times. She stated the staff have received in-services on call bells and she has started making rounds in the facility to monitor compliance. She stated when the call bell is not within reach it places the resident at risk for injury and not being able to get what they need. Review of in-service training, dated 03/27/2024, reflected call lights are everyone's responsibility and something anyone can help with. The training reflected the staff are to make sure call bells are within reach every time the staff enter and exit the room.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents unable to conduct activities of dail...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents unable to conduct activities of daily living (ADLs) received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 4 of 8 (Resident #12, Resident #18, Resident #25, and Resident #28) residents reviewed for ADL care. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident # 12, Resident #18, Resident #25, and Resident #28 nails were cleaned and did not have any rough edges. These failures placed residents at risk of a decline in their hygiene, loss of dignity and decreased quality of life. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident # 12's Face Sheet dated, 08/22/2024, reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications (high levels of blood glucose can damage the blood vessels and nerves that control the heart), lack of coordination (a problem with movement that can manifest in a variety of ways, such as difficulty with fine motor skills), anxiety disorder (worry endlessly over everyday issues such as health, money, family problems-even if the person realizes there's little cause for concern). Record review of Resident #12's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 07/19/2024, reflected the resident had a BIMS score of 07 indicated his cognition was severely impaired. Resident #12 required assistance with personal hygiene, dressing, transfers, and showers/bathing. Resident #12 had a behavior problem of picking at skin on his hand. Record review of Resident #12's Comprehensive Care Plan, dated 08/14/2024 reflected Resident #12 had an ADL self-care performance deficit. Intervention: Resident required assistance with personal hygiene, dressing, transfers, bed mobility, and toileting. Observation on 08/20/2023 at 10:50 AM, Resident # 12's nails was rough around the edges on his right hand. He also had blackish substance underneath his nails on his middle and ring fingers on his right hand. Resident was sitting in wheelchair in his room. There was an odor of feces on residents' fingers. In an interview on 08/20/3034 at 10:53 AM, Resident #12 stated he sometimes scratched his bottom at night and he got poop ( a word for feces) on my fingers. He stated he asked someone to clean it last night and the lady said she would come back and clean his fingers. Resident #12 said no one came back to his room. He did not respond to questions about his fingernails being rough around the edges. 2. Record review of Resident # 18's Face Sheet dated, 08/22/2024, reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] diagnoses of : type two diabetes mellitus without complications (high levels of blood glucose can damage the blood vessels and nerves that control the heart), muscle weakness- generalized (loss of muscle strength), combined forms of age-related cataract, bilateral ( when the lens in both eyes becomes cloudy from age, injury or disease), other lack of coordination (a problem with movement that can manifest in a variety of ways, such as difficulty with fine motor skills), hemiplegia , unspecified affecting left non dominant side ( left side paralysis- the loss ability to move). Record review of Resident #18's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 07/18/2024, reflected Resident #18 had a BIMS score of 10 indicated her cognition was moderately impaired. She required assistance from staff with personal hygiene, dressing, transfers, eating and bathing. Record review of Resident #18's Comprehensive Care Plan, dated 07/31/2024, reflected Resident #18 wished to have long fingernails. Intervention: keep fingernails smooth and clean. Monitor for any skin impairments related to long fingernails. Resident #18 makes poor safety choices. Intervention: Attempt to monitor Resident #18 in regard to safety choices that place resident at risk. Educate Resident #18 on risks associated with poor safety choices. Resident #18 had an ADL self-care performance deficit. Intervention: Resident #18 was dependent on staff for personal hygiene. Observation on 08/20/2024 at 11:15 AM, Resident #18 was in her room sitting in wheelchair. Resident #18 nails were approximately 1-2 inches long on both hands. Resident #18's left hand had nails on her ring finger, middle finger, and fore finger rough around the edges. In an interview on 08/202/2024 at 11:17 AM, Resident #18 stated she preferred her nails long but wanted her nails to be filed so they would not be so uneven and rough. She stated she always had a lot of pride in her fingernails and loved them long but did not prefer them to be unkept with not being filed. Resident #18 stated she was not able to file her nails any longer. She stated she asked someone on Saturday and on Sunday to file her nails and both of the ladies that worked at this facility told her that was not their job she would need to speak to the person who does activities she was the only staff that filed nails. Resident #18 stated she scratched her arm a little with one of her nails as she pointed to her right arm. Observed on 08/20/2024 at 11:19 AM, Resident #18's right arm and there was a small scratch, however, it was not a skin tear. 3. Record review of Resident #25's Face Sheet, dated 06/17/2024, reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] with a diagnoses of lack of coordination (a problem with movement that can manifest in a variety of ways, such as difficulty with fine motor skills), age-related physical debility ( frail patients often present with symptoms including weakness, fatigue, medical complexity, and reduced tolerance to medical and surgical interventions), muscle weakness (loss of muscle strength), muscle wasting and atrophy, not elsewhere classified, other site ( muscle atrophy - the wasting or thinning of muscle mass, muscle wasting- weakening, shrinking, and loss of muscle caused by disease or lack of use), and anxiety disorder due to known physiological condition ( when anxiety symptoms (startle easily and can't relax) are a direct result of a physical health problem). Record review of Resident #25's admission MDS Assessment, dated 06/21/2024, reflected Resident #25 had a BIMS score of 9 indicated Resident cognition was moderately impaired. He required assistance with personal hygiene, showers, dressing and toileting hygiene. Record review of Resident #25's Comprehensive Care Plan, dated 07/12/2024, reflected Resident #25 had an ADL self-care performance deficit. Intervention: Resident #25 required assistance with personal hygiene, toileting hygiene, showers, and dressing. Resident #25 was resistive to care related to anxiety (startle easily and can't relax) he will refuse turning and repositioning and repositioning to offload areas and therapy participation sometimes. Intervention: Allow Resident #25 to make decisions about treatment regimen, to provide sense of control. Resident #25 had a communication problem related to aphasia ( a language disorder that affects a person's ability to understand and express language, including reading and writing). Resident #25 had a mood problem anxiety related to disease process of CVA ( a medical conditions that occurs when blood flow to the brain is suddenly cut off - this diagnosis was not listed on the face sheet) Intervention: Monitor/record/ report to medical doctor as needed acute episode feelings or sadness; feelings of worthlessness or guilt or change in psychomotor (movement-oriented activities that require practice and involved characteristics such as coordination, strength, speed and flexibility). Observation on 08/20/2024 at 11:30 AM, Resident #25 was lying in bed. His nails were approximately three inches long on all fingers on both hands. All of his fingernails on the left hand were rough around the edges. His right hand had blackish substance of a bowel movement (the process of moving waste through the intestines after eating or drinking) odor. There was a blackish substance on the tips of his middle and forefinger on his right hand. Resident #25 had a blackish substance underneath his nails on his fore finger, middle finger, and ring finger of the right hand. Attempted interview on 08/20/2024 at 11:34 AM, Resident #25 did not want to be interviewed. Attempted interview on 08/20/2024 at 3:05 PM, Resident #25 did not want to be interviewed. 4. Record review of Resident # 28's Face Sheet, dated, 08/22/2024, reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications (high levels of blood glucose can damage the blood vessels and nerves that control the heart), lack of coordination (a problem with movement that can manifest in a variety of ways, such as difficulty with fine motor skills), muscle weakness (loss of muscle strength), muscle wasting and atrophy, not elsewhere classified, other site ( muscle atrophy - the wasting or thinning of muscle mass, muscle wasting- weakening, shrinking, and loss of muscle caused by disease or lack of use), unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, with anxiety ( a condition in which a person loses the ability to think and solve problems. Unspecified severity- a medical classification for dementia that does not have a specific diagnosis and does not have a specified severity. Anxiety with dementia- often related directly to worries about coping with the condition and what the future holds). Record review of Resident #28's admission MDS Assessment, dated 07/27/2024, reflected Resident #28 had a BIMS score of 6 indicated his cognitive status is severely impaired. He required assistance with bathing, dressing, personal hygiene, and transfers. Record review of Resident #28's Comprehensive Care Plan, dated 08/14/2024, reflected Resident #28 needed had an ADL self-care performance deficit. Intervention: Resident #25 required assistance with personal hygiene, toileting hygiene, showers, and dressing. Observation on 8/20/2024 at 1:03 PM, reflected Resident # 28 was sitting in his wheelchair in his room. He had approximately 2-3 inches of long nails on his right and left hand. Resident #28's forefinger nail had a sharp nail only in the corner of the finger on his left hand. Resident #28's ring finger, thumb, small finger, and middle fingernails on his left hand was rough around the edges. Resident #28 had a very long nail approximately 4 inches long on his right hand. Resident #28 right hand had a sharp nail and rough around the edges in the corner of his ring finger. His right-hand fingernails on his middle finger and fore finger had a blackish substance underneath these nails. There was an odor of bowel movement (the process of moving waste through the intestines after eating or drinking) odor. In an interview on 08/20/2024 at 1:06 PM Resident #28 stated when he nails gets long and he can not find anyone to cut his nails, he will bend his nails until they break. He stated that is why you see that sharp nails in the corners. Resident #28 also stated when he bends his nails they don't break smoothly and causes a sharp point on some of his nails. He stated if someone does not want to cut his nails he will do it himself. Resident #28 stated he was a diabetic (high levels of blood glucose can damage the blood vessels and nerves that control the heart), and he knew his nails may become infected if his nails was not cut properly. Resident #28 stated he did have to use the bathroom last night and did have poop (a slang word for feces- waste matter from the bowels after food had been digested) to come out his bottom. Resident #28 stated he did scratch his bottom and got poop on his hands and he tried to get most of it off his hand (he raised his right hand when he was discussing where the poop was located). In an interview on 08/22/2024 at 1:30 PM, ADON G stated if a resident had rough edges around the nail there was a possibility the resident may scratch themselves or someone else and develop a skin tear. She stated if a resident ingested blackish substance on their fingers or underneath their fingernails, there was a possibility the substance may be some type of bacteria. She stated a resident may develop a stomach illness with symptoms of diarrhea and vomiting. ADON G stated it was according to what the bacteria was to determine if a resident would become ill. ADON G stated the nurses completed all nail care for residents with a diagnosis of diabetes (high levels of blood glucose can damage the blood vessels and nerves that control the heart). She stated if a staff was not certain if they were to file someone nails the staff was expected to ask their nurse supervisor. ADON G stated all residents was expected to receive nail care during showers and as needed. She stated it was the nurse supervisor responsibility to monitor nail care. ADON G stated she would need to review the electronic medical record to determine if any residents refused nail care. In an interview on 08/22/2024 at 4:45 PM, CNA K stated the nurses completed all diabetic (high levels of blood glucose can damage the blood vessels and nerves that control the heart) fingernails and the CNAs were responsible for all other residents' nails. CNA K stated the CNAs were responsible to complete nail care such as trimming, filing, and cleaning the nails during showers and as needed. CNA K stated if a resident had blackish substance underneath their nails, it was probably some type of bacteria such as bowel movements (the process of moving waste through the intestines after eating or drinking). She stated if a resident swallowed bacteria it was a potential the resident may become ill and may develop major stomach problems such as diarrhea or vomiting. CNA K stated if a resident became severely ill the resident may need to be transferred to emergency room for more care. She stated she worked with Resident #12, Resident #18, Resident #25, and Resident #28. CNA K stated the only resident she knew resisted care was Resident #25. CNA K stated Resident #25 resisted being turned or repositioned she was not aware of him refusing nail care. and Resident #31, and she was not aware of them refusing nail care. She stated if a resident's nails were rough around the edges there was a possibility the resident may scratch themselves and develop a skin tear, or possibly scratch their eye and cause a tear on their eyeball. CNA K stated she had been in-service on nail care but did not remember the date of the in-service. In an interview on 08/22/2024 at 5:05 PM, CNA C stated the CNAs was responsible for cleaning, trimming, and filing all residents' nails except for the residents with diagnosis of diabetes (high levels of blood glucose can damage the blood vessels and nerves that control the heart) and the nurses was responsible for residents with diabetes. CNA C stated the nurses was responsible for all residents' nails with diagnosis of diabetes. CNA C stated if a resident had a rough nails or their nails were dirty, nail care was expected to be completed as needed. CNA C stated if a resident nails was rough around the edges there was a possibility a resident may scratch themselves or another resident. CNA C stated the scratch may develop into a skin tear. CNA C stated if there was a blackish substance on the residents' fingertips or underneath their nails and the resident swallowed the blackish substance there was a possibility a resident may become ill with stomach issues such as vomiting. She stated she worked at this facility as needed. CNA C also stated she had given care to Resident # 28, Resident #12, Resident #18, and Resident #25. She stated she was not aware of any of these residents refusing nail care. She stated she had been in-serviced on nail care but did not recall the date. In an interview on 08/22/2024 at 5:35 PM, LVN A stated the nurses and the CNAs were responsible for nail care. She stated the nurses were responsible to trim and clean all resident's nails with a diagnosis of diabetes (high levels of blood glucose can damage the blood vessels and nerves that control the heart). LVN A stated it was the CNAs responsibility to clean and trim all other residents' nails. She stated she was not aware of Resident #10, Resident #28, Resident #12 or Resident #25 refused nail care. She stated Resident # 25 would refuse to be turned or off load his heels but not nail care. LVN A stated if there was a blackish substance underneath the residents' nails, there was a possibility the substance had bacteria underneath the residents' nails. She stated if a resident swallowed the bacteria there was a possibility a resident may become extremely ill with stomach issues such as diarrhea and vomiting. LVN A stated if a resident scratched themselves with rough nails there was a potential a resident may develop a skin tear and there was a possibility the resident may scratch another resident and cause a skin tear on another resident. She stated she had been in-serviced on nail care but did not recall the date of the in-service.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0679 (Tag F0679)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed, based on the comprehensive assessment and care plan and ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed, based on the comprehensive assessment and care plan and the preferences of each resident, an ongoing program to support residents in their choice of activities, both facility sponsored, individual activities, independent activities, designed to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental and psychosocial well-being of each resident , encouraging both independence and interaction in the community for 3 of 8 residents ( Resident #10, Resident #19, and Resident #25) reviewed for activities. The facility failed to develop an activity program based on preferences of Resident #10, Resident #19, Resident #25 during the months of July to August 2024. These failures placed residents at risk of boredom, depression, increased behaviors, and diminished quality of life. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #10's Face Sheet, dated 08/22/2024, reflected an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with the diagnosis depression unspecified (used when a person's symptoms do not clearly align with a specific mental disorder or where there is insufficient information for a more definitive diagnosis), other secondary parkinsonism ( caused by brain injuries or brain disorders), and cognitive communication deficit (can effect both verbal and nonverbal communication, such as speaking, listening, reading, writing, and social interaction skills). Record review of Resident #10's Annual MDS Assessment, dated 01/30/2024, reflected Resident #10 was rarely/never understood. She had poor short (unable to recall after 5 minutes and long (unable to recall long past memories) term memory recall. Resident #10 does not have speech (absence of spoken words). Resident #10 activity preferences was listening to music and participating in religious activities or practices. Record review of Resident #10s Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 07/30/2024, reflected Resident #10 had poor short (unable to recall events after 5 minutes) and long-term memory recall (unable to recall past events). Resident #10 was rarely/ never understood or rarely/never understands others. Record review of Resident 10's Comprehensive Care Plan, dated 08/14/2024, reflected Resident #10 required staff assistance for meeting emotional, intellectual, physical, and social needs related to disease process and immobility. Intervention: Resident #10 needed in-room visits and activities. Record review of Resident #10's in room activity participation record in the electronic medical record reflected Resident #10 did not have any documentation of receiving in room activities or attending group activities. The record review was completed with the Activity Director M. She stated she did not have any participation records on Resident #10. Observation on 8/20/2024 at 10:31 AM. Resident #10 was sitting in the lobby asleep. Observation on 08/20/2024 at 4:00 PM, Resident #10 was in bed. Her door to her room was slightly opened. Resident #10 was awake there was no lights on in her room. Television was not on and did not observe any radio in her room which music was her favorite activity. Resident #10's room was dark and she was moving her eyes side to side. Resident had sad expression (forehead wrinkled and eyebrows were brought together -signs of sad expression). In an interview on 8/20/2024 at 4:05 AM, Resident #10 was not interview able. Observation on 08/21/2024 at 7:45 AM, Resident #10 was in bed. Her door to her room was slightly opened. Resident #10 was awake and there were no lights on in her room and no stimulation such as a radio in her room which is her favorite activity listening to music. Resident #10 did not have television on in room. In an interview on 8/21/2024 at 8:15 AM, Activity Director M stated she did not have any in room or group participation records for the month of July 2024 and August 2024 for Resident #10. She stated she would print all of the in-room participation records for the months of July 2024 and August 2024 In an interview on 08/21/2024 at 8:45 AM, Activity Director M stated after the activity in room participation records were printed Resident #10 did not have any in room or group participation records for the months of July 2024 or August 2024. She stated she did not know if she received in room activities or attended group activities during the months of July 2024 and August 2024. Activity Director M stated if a resident had a diagnosis of depression and was not physically able to do activities without assist from another person, there was a possibility Resident # 10 may become more depressed and may become very lonely. She stated Resident #10 quality of life may decrease. She stated Resident #10 does sit in the lobby but sleeps most of the time and she was not receiving any activities in the lobby. She stated it was her responsibility to ensure all residents received activities according to their past and current interest. 2. Record review of Resident #19's Face Sheet, dated 08/22/2024, reflected a 94- year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety (a condition in which a person loses the ability to think and solve problems. Unspecified severity- a medical classification for dementia that does not have a specific diagnosis and does not have a specified severity), major depressive disorder ( feelings of guilt or worthlessness, lack of energy, agitation ( unable to stay calm) and /or sleep disturbances), and unspecified glaucoma (a group of eye diseases that cause increased pressure in the eye, which can damage vision). Record review of Resident #19's admission MDS Assessment, dated 10/18/2024, reflected Resident #19 had a BIMS score of a 15 indicated her cognition was intact. Resident #19's activity preferences were the following: go outside and get fresh air when weather permitted, participate in religious services or practices, listen to music, reading such as: books, newspapers, and magazines. Participating in groups activities was not very important to Resident #19. Record review of Resident #19's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 07/17/2024, reflected Resident #19 had a BIMS score of 15 indicated her cognition was intact. Resident #19 had moderately impaired vision- not able to see newspaper headlines but can identify objects. She was assessed to feel down, depressed, or hopeless. Resident #19 also felt tired and bad about herself, had difficulty concentrating on things such as: reading or watching television. Record review of Resident #19's Comprehensive Care Plan, dated 07/31/2024, reflected Resident #19 required staff assistance for meeting emotional, intellectual, physical, and social needs related to immobility. Intervention Resident #19 needed in room visits and activities if unable to attend out of room events. Resident was resistive to care related to adjustment to nursing home and dementia (a condition in which a person loses the ability to think and solve problems). Resident #19 refused to get out of bed. Intervention: All Resident #10 to make decisions about treatment regime, to provide sense of control. Resident #19 had impaired cognitive function/dementia (a condition in which a person loses the ability to think and solve problems). Intervention: Reminisce with Resident #19 using photos of family and friends. Observation on 8/20/2024 at 11:30 AM, Resident #19 was in her room lying in bed. The door to her room was barely opened and she did not have television on and did not see a radio or other stimulation in her room. Resident #19 had sad expression on her face such as (forehead wrinkled, and eyebrows were brought together -signs of sad expression). Resident #19 was staring toward the ceiling. In an interview on 08/202/2024 at 11:33 AM, Resident #19 stated she was lonely and there was not anything for her to do except watch television and she was tired of television. She stated she did not receive in room visits or activities from anyone and she did not know what in room visits or in room activities was until now. Resident #19 stated she never heard of in room activities. Resident #19 stated she did not prefer to attend group activities it made her feel uncomfortable being around others in a group. She stated if someone would just bring her a radio or something for her to listen to music. Resident #19 stated she loved Gospel music and liked country music. She stated if there was gospel or country music on television she never knew about it or ever saw it on television. Resident #19 stated music was her favorite thing to do. She stated she never liked to read very much due to her vision. Resident #19 stated her neighbor had books on tape and her neighbor would listen to different types of books. Resident #19 stated she might enjoy listening to books but she would need to try it before she made decision if she liked to listen to books. Resident #19 stated no one had ever offered her anything to read and with her poor vision it would need to be very large print. Resident #19 stated she did like to go outside in the spring and fall sometimes. She stated she did not recall anyone assisting her to sit outside. Resident #19 stated that would be nice sometimes not every day or every week but maybe once or twice a month when weather was cooler. She stated she did like to listen to devotionals. She stated it would be nice if someone read the bible to her or a devotional to her once a week. Resident #19 stated there is never anything to do and no one comes by and will sit and talk to me. She stated do you think you can talk to someone and ask them if they would visit with me sometimes and bring me something to do instead of watching television all the time. In an interview on 08/21/2024 at 8:15 AM, Activity Director M stated Resident #19 was not on the in-room activity program. She stated she did not realize Resident #19 was not getting out of bed very often. The Activity Director M stated she did not have any participation records for Resident #19 during months of July 2024 and August 2024. She stated she had not been reminiscing using photos of Resident #19's family and friends. Activity Director M stated if Resident #19 did not want to attend group activities she needed to be receiving in room activities. Activity Director M stated she did not realize it was on Resident #19's care plan she was to receive in room activities reminiscing about family or friends' photos. She stated Resident #19 had a potential of becoming bored and depressed if she was not doing the activities she preferred or not doing any type of activities in her room. Activity Director M stated she had not been offering her large print books to read, books on tape or a radios. She stated if music, religious activities and going outside was her favorite activities these type of activities was expected to be provide to Resident #19. She stated it was her responsibility to ensure all residents received activities according to their past and current interest. 3. Record review of Resident #25's Face Sheet, dated 06/17/2024, reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] with a diagnoses of lack of coordination (a problem with movement that can manifest in a variety of ways, such as difficulty with fine motor skills), age-related physical debility ( frail patients often present with symptoms including weakness, fatigue, medical complexity, and reduced tolerance to medical and surgical interventions), muscle weakness (loss of muscle strength), muscle wasting and atrophy, not elsewhere classified, other site ( muscle atrophy - the wasting or thinning of muscle mass, muscle wasting- weakening, shrinking, and loss of muscle caused by disease or lack of use), and anxiety disorder due to known physiological condition ( when anxiety symptoms (startle easily and can't relax) are a direct result of a physical health problem). Record review of Resident #25's admission MDS Assessment, dated 06/21/2024, reflected Resident #25 had a BIMS score of 9 indicated Resident cognition was moderately impaired. Resident#25's activity preference was the following: have books, newspaper, and magazines to read, listen to music, watching news, go outside to get fresh air when the weather was good, and participating in religious services or practices. Record review of Resident #25's Comprehensive Care Plan, dated 07/12/2024, reflected Resident #25 had a mood problem anxiety related to disease process of CVA ( a medical conditions that occurs when blood flow to the brain is suddenly cut off - this diagnosis was not listed on the face sheet) Intervention: Monitor/record/ report to medical doctor as needed acute episode feelings or sadness; feelings of worthlessness or guilt or change in psychomotor (movement-oriented activities that require practice and involved characteristics such as coordination, strength, speed and flexibility). Resident # 25 had impaired cognitive function/dementia or impaired thought process (a condition in which a person loses the ability to think and solve problems). Intervention Reminisce with Resident #25 using photos of family and friends. Observation on 08/20/2024 at 11:30 AM, Resident #25 was lying in bed. The lights were off in his room and the door was slightly open leading into his room. He did not want to discuss anything about his nails. He made eye contact with Surveyor O when mentioned in room activities or in room visits. Resident #25 also clinched his mouth / jaw (sign of stress) when surveyor O mentioned if he received in room visits talking about pictures of his family and friends. Resident #25 did not have any stimulation in his room. Interview on 08/20/2024 at 11:34 AM, Resident #25 stated no when asked if he received activities or visits in his room showing him pictures of his family and friends. Resident #25 stated no when asked if he liked to do anything with a group of people. In an interview on 08/21/2024 at 8:15 AM, Activity Director M stated Resident #25 was on the in-room activity program due to Resident #25 did not attend group activities. She stated her schedule was to visit all in room residents Monday to Friday in the morning. Activity Director M stated according to Resident #25's participation records he only received two in room activities during the month of July 2024 and did not receive any in room activities during month of August 2024. She stated Resident #25 had a potential of becoming depressed, lonely and may have a decrease of quality of life. She stated she had not reminisced with Resident #25 with photos of his family and friends. She stated Resident #25 was expected to receive in room visits/ activities Monday thru Friday. Activity Director M stated she did not have any excuse why she did not visit Resident #25 to provide in room activities/ visits. She stated it was her responsibility to ensure all residents received activities according to their past and current interest. In an interview on 08/22/2024 at 2:05 PM, the Administrator stated all activities including in room visits was expected to be documented on the date the activity occurred with the residents. She stated if the Activity Director M did not document any activities, the activity did not occur with the resident or residents. The Administrator stated a resident may become depressed, lonely and have a diminish quality of life if they were not receiving activities of their preferences on a daily or weekly basis. She stated she had been in this facility approximately two weeks and would definitely be making observations of the activity programming. Record review of the Facility's Policy on Activity Programs, revised on 06/2018, reflected activity programs are designed to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. Activities offered are based on the comprehensive resident -centered assessment and the preferences of each resident. All activities are documented in the resident's medical record.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with profession standards for food safety for 1 of 1 kitchen revi...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with profession standards for food safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for food and safety and sanitation. 1. The facility failed to appropriately thaw frozen meant defrost on 08/20/2024. 2. The facility failed to store boxes of food off the floor, ensure the floor of the refrigerator was free of debris in the walk- in refrigerator on 08/20/2024. 3. The facility failed to ensure Dietary Aide P washed or sanitized her hands prior to placing new gloves on her hands when she was giving a resident some zip lock bags on 08/21/2024. These failures placed residents at risk for health complications and foodborne illness. Findings included: Observation on 08/20/2024 at 9:05 AM, there was approximately 10 pound of frozen hamburger meat in a clear plastic round tube shape located in a pot sitting in the kitchen sink. The hamburger meat was not thawed and more than half was frozen. There was not any running water over the frozen hamburger meat. There was approximately half of the frozen hamburger meat not submerge in the water. Only half of the hamburger meat was submerged in the water. In an interview on 08/20/2024 at 9:08 AM, Dietary Aide P stated all the hamburger meat was required to be in the water to be defrosted. She stated running water was also expected to be running over the hamburger meat while it was being defrosted. Dietary Aide P stated she forgot to run the water over the hamburger meat and place the hamburger meat in a larger pot. Dietary Aide P stated she was in a hurry and forgot. She stated if the hamburger meat was not defrosted properly there was a possibility the hamburger meat may be ruined from being defrosted at room temperature. She stated it was a possibility a resident may become ill with stomach issues if the resident ate ruined meat. 2. Observation on 08/20/2204 at 9:13 AM, there were four boxes of food stacked on top of one another located in the walk-in refrigerator floor. There were also some paper napkins on the floor and one was stuck to the surveyors shoe. In the corner of the walk-in refrigerator was some type of crumbled food. 3. Observation on 08/22/2024 at 11: 15 AM, Dietary Aide P removed gloves from her hand and placed them in garbage can. She did not wash or sanitize hands after removing the gloves. Dietary Aide P touched her clothes and picked up 2 new gloves from the glove container. She touched the outside of the gloves such as fourchettes (slender pieces of fabric or rubber that forms the sides of the finger). Dietary Aide P placed the gloves on her hands and picked up approximately 3 zip plastic bags and placed her fingers inside two of the plastic bags and gave it to a resident. Interview on 08/22/2024 at 11:20 AM, Dietary P stated she did touch her shirt after she removed her gloves. She stated she did not sanitize or wash her hands prior to placing new gloves on her hands. Dietary aide stated she did pick up the gloves where the fingers go inside the gloves. She stated she was expected to wash her hands prior to placing new gloves on her hands. Dietary Aide P stated she had been in-serviced on hand hygiene and wearing gloves when changing tasks or touching anything not sanitary. Interview on 08/22/2024 at 2:05 PM, the Administrator stated all boxes located in the walk-in refrigerator was expected to be on a crate or on the shelves. She stated no boxes was to be stored on the floor of the refrigerator. She stated the boxes may become damp and the food inside of the boxes had a potential of being wet or damp. She also stated it was a possibility of a safety hazard if the boxes were stacked on each other they could fall and injure a staff. The Administrator stated all frozen meat was required to be defrosted on a flat pan located in the refrigerator on the bottom shelf. She stated if the dietary staff was defrosting hamburger meat in the sink all of the hamburger meat was expected to be submerged in water with running water pouring over the frozen hamburger meat. She stated it was a possibility the meat may ruin if not defrosted correctly but there was a slight chance of this occurring when defrosting. The Administrator stated all staff was to wash and sanitize their hands when they removed gloves and prior to placing new gloves on their hands. She stated if the dietary aide P did not sanitize her hands and touched inside the zip plastic bags to give to a resident there was a possibility the bags could become cross contaminated. She stated there should not be any paper napkins on the floor in the walk-in refrigerator. The Administrator stated all areas of the kitchen including walk-in refrigerator was expected to be kept clean and organized. In an interview on 08/22/2024 at 3:45 PM, Dietary Manager L stated all meat was required to be defrosted either in the refrigerator on a flat pan located on the bottom shelf of the refrigerator or in the sink in a container with running water pouring over the meat. She stated the hamburger meat was to be submerged in the pot and be defrosted with running water over the entire hamburger meat. Dietary Manger L stated there was a possibility the portion of the hamburger meat not submerged in the water would not be defrosted correctly and may cause illness with a resident if the hamburger meat was ruined. She stated any time dietary staff removes their gloves they were expected to wash their hands immediately before doing any other type of task including placing new gloves on their hands. Dietary Manger L stated if Dietary Aide P touched the outside of the new gloves with her contaminated hands there was a possibility bacteria could cross contaminated inside of the plastic bags. She stated if the resident was placing food inside of those bags there was a potential where bacteria touch the food. Dietary Manger L stated if a resident ate contaminated food the resident may become sick with any type of stomach issues such as vomiting and diarrhea. She stated the boxes located in the walk-in refrigerator was not to be stored on the floor. She stated they were expected to be stored on pallets or on the shelves in the refrigerator. Dietary Manager L stated this had a potential of becoming a safety hazard due to the boxes was stacked on top of each other and if they feel a staff may become injured. She stated there should never been any type of napkins or paper on the floor in the walk-in refrigerator or anywhere in the kitchen. Dietary Manager L stated this was not sanitary. She stated there should never be any type of food on the refrigerator floor. She stated this was also not sanitary. Review of the facility policy on Food Preparation and Service, dated 10/2022, reflected Foods will not be thawed at room temperature. Thawing procedures include: a. Thawing in the refrigerator in a drip-proof container. b. Completely submerging the item in cold running water (70°F or below) that is running fast enough to agitate and remove loose ice particles. c. Thawing in a microwave oven and then cooking and serving immediately; or d. Thawing as part of a continuous cooking process Facility policy of Refrigerators and Freezers, dated 10/2022, reflected This facility will ensure safe refrigerator and freezer maintenance, temperatures, and sanitation, and will observe food expiration guidelines. Refrigerators and freezers will be kept clean, free of debris, and mopped with sanitizing solution on scheduled basis and more often as necessary. Facility policy on Preventing Foodborne Illness- Employee Hygiene and Sanitary Practices, reviewed 06/12/2024, reflected Food and nutrition services employees will follow appropriate hygiene and sanitary procedures to prevent the spread of foodborne illness. Employees must wash their hands during food preparation, as often as necessary to remove soil and contamination and to prevent cross contamination when changing tasks; and/or after engaging in other activities that contaminate the hands.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection and prevention co...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection and prevention control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 5 (Resident #1, Resident #11, Resident #28, Resident #4, and Resident #17) of 35 residents reviewed for infection control. 1. LVN B failed to clean the reusable blood pressure (BP) cuff between resident use. 2. LVN A failed to perform hand hygiene and clean the catheter tip before performing catheter irrigation for Resident #17's suprapubic catheter (a flexible tube that drains urine from the bladder through a small incision in the lower abdomen) 3. The facility failed to ensure LVN I sanitized or washed her hands after touching contaminated items when delivering meal trays to residents, when setting up Resident #1, Resident #11 and, Resident #28's meal trays and during feeding of Resident #11 on 08/20/2024. These failures could place residents at risk for cross contamination and infection. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #4's face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of hemiplegia (paralysis or severe weakness in one side of the body) and cerebral infarction (stroke). Review of Resident #4's Optional MDS, dated [DATE], reflected a BIMS score of 11 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #4's Care Plan reflected resident requires staff assistance for meeting needs and has hypertension requiring BP monitoring and medication. Observation during med pass on 08/21/2024 at 08:30 AM, revealed LVN B checked the vital signs for Resident #6 and placed the BP cuff back on the medication cart without cleaning it. She then used the BP cuff to take vital signs for Resident #4 without cleaning the cuff first. In an interview on 08/21/2024 at 08:36 AM, LVN B stated she should have cleaned the BP machine in between resident use but didn't. She stated it is policy to clean it before and after use because of the germs and risk for infection. 2. Review of Resident #17's face sheet reflected an [AGE] year old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and again on 09/02/2022 with diagnoses of incomplete quadriplegia ( paralysis that affects a person's limbs and body from the neck down), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a group of lung disease that blocks airflow and makes it difficult to breathe), and overactive bladder (a problem with bladder function that causes the sudden need to urinate). Review of Resident #17's care plan, dated 07/16/2024, reflected resident has a suprapubic catheter and foley care should be provided every shift and as needed. Review of Resident #17's orders, date 07/17/2024, reflected an order to flush the catheter with 120-180 milliliters of sterile water every other day. Observation on 08/21/2024 at 09:56 AM, during suprapubic catheter irrigation procedure for Resident #17 revealed LVN A sanitize her hands and don gloves and gown. She placed the irrigation tray and supplies on the bedside table, opened the kit and then disconnected the draining bag from Resident #17's catheter and handed it to the resident to hold. She then poured the sterile water into the container and drew up some in the syringe. She connected the syringe to the catheter without cleaning the catheter tip first. She then began attempting to flush the catheter. She was not able to flush the catheter and called for assistance. She then reconnected the old drainage bag to the catheter while waiting for assistance. In an interview on 08/21/2024 at 11:10 AM, LVN A stated she forgot to clean the catheter before and after she attempted irrigation and reconnected the old bag. She stated not cleaning her hands and the catheter before irrigation placed the resident at risk for bladder infection. In an interview on 08/22/2024 at 5:30 PM, the interim DON stated reusable medical equipment should be sanitized before every use to prevent the spread of infection. She stated she would expect staff to follow procedure for aseptic technique during catheter irrigation to prevent the spread of infection. In an interview on 08/22/2024 at 5:50 PM, the Administrator stated the BP cuff should be cleaned in between residents for infection control. She stated she is not a nurse but would expect staff to follow procedure for catheter flushing to prevent the resident from getting an infection. Review of facility policy for reusable medical equipment, dated 03/2023, reflected items that come in contact with intact skin but not mucous membranes, such as BP cuffs, should be cleaned and disinfected between residents. Review of facility policy for catheter care, dated March 2024, reflected staff should use aseptic technique when there is a break in the closed system and clean technique when handling the catheter, tubing, or drainage bag. The policy does not specifically address the procedure for catheter irrigation. 3. Observation on 09/20/2024 at 12:13 PM to 12:35 PM, reflected LVN I entered the dining room from the hall. She touched her clothes and moved her hair away from her face. LVN I began to speak to residents and touched the residents' clothes and wheelchair handles. She began to look at the meal trays on the meal tray cart. LVN I picked up one lid of a meal tray and touched the tines ( the pointed prongs that allow you to spear and pick up the food) of the fork of Resident #28's meal tray. LVN I delivered Resident #28's meal tray to him in the dining room and did not change his fork. LVN I returned to the meal tray cart and did not sanitize her hands. She had the meal tray and touched the dirty dishwasher doorknob to enter the dishwasher room and placed meal tray on top of dirty plates and the middle finger, forefinger and ring finger touched dirty dishes in the dishwasher room. She exited the dishwasher room and proceeded to the meal cart without sanitizing or washing her hands. She picked up a meal tray off the meal cart and delivered the meal tray to Resident #1. When LVN I sat the meal tray on the table in front of Resident #1 she opened the thickened liquid water and the top part of her middle finger and fore finger on her right hand touched inside the container and touched the thickened water. LVN J asked LVN I to go into the hall and sanitize her hands. LVN I did not go into the hall to sanitize her hands or attempt to wash her hands. LVN I continued to pass out meal trays. LVN I delivered Resident #11's meal tray to her. She touched resident's hand and her specialty chair. LVN I opened Resident #11's thickened liquid and her forefinger and middle finger touched the thickened liquid and when she removed the lid off of Resident #11's plate of food she touched the green beans. After setting up the meal tray LVN I sat in a chair to begin to feed Resident #11. LVN I was given hand sanitizer and did sanitize her hands prior to feeding Resident #11. During feeding Resident #11, LVN I touched with her fore finger, ring finger and middle finger on her right hand the following: the arms of the chair she was sitting in, touched her own clothes and touched Resident #11's Hoyer lift sling to reposition the sling in Resident #11's chair. She also touched Resident #11's right hand. LVN I did not re-sanitize or wash her hands. LVN I picked up Resident #11's napkin to wipe off Resident #11's mouth. When LVN I wiped Resident #11's mouth she touched the side of Resident #11's upper lip with her fore finger and middle finger on her right hand. LVN J was sanitizing her hands every time she touched the table, chair or any object may be considered contaminated. She was feeding Resident #3. In an interview on 08/20/2024 at 1:33 PM, LVN I stated she never sanitized her hands during the time she was passing out meal trays and setting up meal trays for the residents. LVN I stated she was expected to sanitize or wash her hands when passing out meal trays and when she was setting up meal trays for the residents. She stated she did not recall if she touched the tips of the fork, napkins, inside the thickened liquids container for Resident #1 and Resident #11. LVN I stated she did touch the door knob leading into the dishwashing room and she may have touched dirty dishes. She stated she did not recall touching her clothes, her hair, resident's wheelchair, or sling in Resident #11's specialty chair. She stated it was possible she did touch all of this but she was focused on delivering meal trays and feeding Resident #11 instead of what she was touching. LVN I stated it is impossible for staff to sanitize their hands if they touch anything may be contaminated. She stated the only time she sanitized her hands was when she sat on a chair to feed Resident #11. She stated she did touch arm of her chair; the sling Resident was sitting on in her specialty chair and possibly her own clothes. LVN I stated it is crazy to expect staff to sanitize their hands every time they touch an object that may be contaminated. She stated this was impossible. LVN I stated she did wipe Resident #11's mouth and she may have touched the side of her lip with her fingers. She stated if she had touched anything contaminated it was a possibility bacteria could cross contaminate onto the fluids, food, napkin, and Resident #11's mouth. LVN I stated she did not believe it was necessary to sanitize her hands every time she touched any type of object that may be contaminated. She stated staff would be sanitizing their hands every few seconds. LVN I stated she had been in-serviced on passing out meal trays and feeding the residents. She stated during in-service it was explained to wash or sanitize hands in between delivering meal trays to the residents and when feeding the residents. LVN I did not answer the question if a resident may become ill if they did ingest some type of bacteria that potentially transferred from her fingers or hands onto the resident's food or drink. In an interview on 08/20/2024 at 00:00, LVN J stated she did ask LVN I to sanitize her hands. She stated LVN I did not sanitize her hands when she was passing out meal trays and setting up meal trays for residents. LVN J stated all staff was expected to sanitize or wash hands during each meal tray delivered to a resident. LVN J stated all staff was to sanitize their hands when they touch their hair, clothes or any object that was considered contaminated. She stated they had been in-serviced on hand hygiene during dining room service. LVN J stated she did not recall the date of the in-service. She stated if a resident did swallow some type of bacteria the resident had a potential of becoming physically ill such as vomiting or diarrhea. In an interview on 08/22/2024 at 1:30 PM, ADON G stated all staff was expected to sanitize their hands prior to delivering meal trays and in between each meal tray delivered to a resident. She stated if staff touched any type of object such as doorknob, wheelchair, resident or staff clothes, hair, Hoyer sling, arms of a chair and/ or table, the staff was expected to sanitize or wash their hands after each contact with anything may be considered contaminated. ADON G stated if staff were not washing or sanitizing their hands during meal service and was touching residents' drinks, food or even plates it was a possibility bacteria may cross contaminate food, utensils such as fork and or the resident's plates. She stated if a resident ingested bacteria there was a possibility a resident may become sick with some type of food borne illness. She stated she had only been working at the facility about three weeks and she only knows about the in-services she had completed since she had been employed at this particular facility. In an interview with the Administrator on 8/22/2024 at 2:05 PM, she stated all staff was expected to wash or sanitize hands prior and in between each meal tray delivered to the residents. She stated the staff was expected to sanitize or wash hands whenever they became in contact with anything considered contaminated such as: hair, clothes, dirty dishes, wheelchair, arms of a chair, etc. The Administrator stated there was a potential a resident may develop a food borne illness if a resident's food or drink was cross contaminated by bacteria on a staff fingers or hands. She stated she began working at this facility approximately two weeks ago and she was trying to look at a lot of things and the in-services been given in the past she had not looked at the in-services at this time and could not answer if an in-service had been given on dining room hand hygiene. Review of facility policy for reusable medical equipment, dated 03/2023, reflected items that come in contact with intact skin but not mucous membranes, such as BP cuffs, should be cleaned and disinfected between residents. Review of facility policy for catheter care, dated March 2024, reflected staff should use aseptic technique when there is a break in the closed system and clean technique when handling the catheter, tubing, or drainage bag. The policy does not specifically address the procedure for catheter irrigation. Review of the Facility Policy of Hand Hygiene, revised on 10-2020 reflected This facility considers hand hygiene the primary means to prevent the spread of infections. All personnel shall be trained on the importance of hand hygiene in preventing the transmission of healthcare- associated infections. Use and alcohol-based hand rub containing at least 62 % alcohol; or , alternatively, soap and water for the following situations: 1. Before and after direct contact with residents. 2. After direct contact with a resident's intact skin.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0921)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff and the public for 5 residents (Reside...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff and the public for 5 residents (Resident #4, Resident #14, Resident #31, Resident # 9, and Resident #8) out of 10 resident rooms reviewed for environment. The facility failed to ensure walls and floors were clean and in good repair for Resident # 4, Resident #14, Resident #31, Resident #9, and Resident #8's room. This failure could affect all residents, staff, and the public by placing them at risk for diminished quality of life due to the lack of a well-kept environment. Findings include: Observation on 08/20/2024 at 03:10 PM in Resident # 4 and Resident # 14's room revealed large (approximately 2 ft) long holes in the wall behind Resident #14's bed. The bed was pushed up into the wall and there was a white powdery substance on the floor behind the bed. Observation in the room further revealed a cable outlet hanging from the wall next to the dresser. Behind Resident #4's bed there were holes in the wall, unable to see the size due to the bed. In an interview on 08/20/2024 at 03:10 PM, Resident # 4 stated he did not know about the holes behind the bed, but he knew about damaged wall where the cable outlet was. He stated it had been that way for a while. Resident #14 was not interview able. Observation on 08/20/2024 at 4:00 PM in Resident # 31's room revealed scratch marks and missing paint behind and next to the resident's bed. There was a brown substance on the floor and white debris on the floor. Observation on 08/20/2024 at 4:10 PM, in Resident # 8 and Resident #9's room revealed missing trim and paint under the windowsill with exposed drywall. Resident # 8's bed was up against the wall under the window with pillows and bedding by the damaged wall. Observation behind Resident #9's bed revealed the bed pushed up into the wall with damaged drywall and white debris/powder on the floor. In an interview on 08/20/2024 at 4:12 PM, Resident #9 stated she did not know about the holes behind her bed, but she knew they pushed the bed in the wall to get the door closed. In an interview on 08/22/2024 at 4:45 PM, Housekeeping supervisor D stated debris falls on the floor every time the bed hits the wall. She stated they do their best to keep the floors clean, but she needs assistance from the nursing staff to move the resident's bed out of the way because she cannot do it herself. She stated they clean the rooms and floors everyday and try to deep clean often. She stated they do not have a floor crew anymore and she does the best she can with the staff they do have. In an interview on 08/22/2024 at 5:00 PM, Maintenance supervisor E stated there have been damages to the walls since March of 2023. He stated he began working in the maintenance department in May of 2024 and started repairing the damaged walls using sheetrock that was previously ordered by someone else but realized it was the wrong material. He stated the administrator told him to hold off until they get the correct supplies. He stated the reason for the damaged walls was because there is no tolerance for door clearance if the bed is pulled away from the wall. He further stated the damaged walls were not homelike and could cause illness due to the drywall dust and could cause depression and make the residents feel unnoticed. He was not aware of the cable wire hanging from the wall and said he would take care of that immediately. In an interview on 08/22/2024 at 5:50 PM, the Administrator stated they were working on fixing the holes in the walls. She stated she contacted a maintenance person from another building to assist. She stated they plan to replace the drywall and place some type of bumper on the walls to prevent further damage. She stated she is unsure how long the holes have been there and did not realize how big they were. She stated maintenance was scheduled to come back this week but delayed due to the survey. She further stated the damaged walls could cause potential harm or risk to the resident from the drywall dust and possible pest problem from the holes. She stated the damages are not homelike. Regarding the dirty floors she stated she has spoken with housekeeping already and expects the floors to be cleaned every day. Review of facility Homelike Environment policy, dated February 2021, reflected residents are provided with a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment . the staff and management maximizes the characteristics of a homelike setting . including a clean, sanitary and orderly environment.
Dec 2023 1 deficiency 1 IJ (1 affecting multiple)
CRITICAL (K) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an Infection Prevention and Co...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an Infection Prevention and Control Program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of disease and infections for 19 out 19. residents (Residents #1 - #19). The facility failed to: 1. ensure staff donned/doffed PPE/outside/inside rooms for residents on transmission-based precautions. 2. ensure staff wore the proper PPE inside the rooms for residents on transmission-based precautions. 3. ensure the facility had the proper PPE outside the rooms for residents on transmission-based precautions. On 12/22/23 at 6:13 PM an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified. While the IJ was removed on 12/24/23 at 3:37 PM, the facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of actual harm that is not immediate to resident health or safety and a scope of pattern due to the facility continuing to monitor the implementation and effectiveness of their Plan of Removal. These failures could affect residents by placing them at risk for communicable diseases that could lead to infection and hospitalization. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's undated face sheet revealed resident is a [AGE] year-old Female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with unspecified dementia(mild memory disturbance), hypertensive heart, chronic kidney disease without heart failure (diseased kidneys are less able to help regulate blood pressure), and shortness of breath. Record review of Resident #2's undated face sheet revealed resident is a [AGE] year-old Male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia (memory loss), atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pe (heart forced to work harder than normal), and essential primary hypertension (abnormal high blood pressure). Record review of Resident #3's undated face sheet revealed resident is a [AGE] year-old Male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pe (heart forced to work harder than normal), acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (acute or chronic impairment of gas exchange between the lungs), and unspecified systolic congestive heart failure (heart failure that occurs in the heart's left ventricle). Record review of Resident #4's undated face sheet revealed resident is a [AGE] year-old Female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hypertensive heart disease without heart failure (a constellation of changes in the left ventricle, left atrium, and coronary arteries as a result of chronic blood pressure elevation), personal history of Covid-19, and major depressive disorder (sadness). Record review of Resident #5's undated face sheet revealed resident is a [AGE] year-old Male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including major depressive disorder (sadness), atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris (heart forced to work harder than normal), and unspecified systolic congestive heart failure (heart failure that occurs in the heart's left ventricle). Record review of Resident #6's undated face sheet revealed resident is a [AGE] year-old Male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including major depressive disorder (sadness), essential primary hypertension (abnormal high blood pressure), and anxiety disorder (pounding or racing heart). Record review of Resident #7's undated face sheet revealed resident is an [AGE] year-old Female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia (sadness) and Alzheimer's (brain disorder destroying memory and thinking skills). Record review of Resident #8's undated face sheet revealed resident is an [AGE] year-old Female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (airflow blockage and breathing-related problem), dementia (memory loss), and essential primary hypertension (abnormal high blood pressure). Record review of Resident #9's undated face sheet revealed resident is an [AGE] year-old Male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia (memory loss) paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (irregular rapid heartbeat causing poor blood flow), and essential primary hypertension (abnormal high blood pressure). Record review of Resident #10's undated face sheet revealed resident is a [AGE] year-old Female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris (heart forced to work harder than normal) acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (acute or chronic impairment of gas exchange between the lungs), and essential primary hypertension (abnormal high blood pressure). Record review of Resident #11's undated face sheet revealed resident is a [AGE] year-old Female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hypertensive heart disease without heart failure (a constellation of changes in the left ventricle, left atrium, and coronary arteries as a result of chronic blood pressure elevation), major depressive disorder(sadness), and peripheral vascular disease (narrowed blood vessels reducing blood flow of limbs). Record review of Resident #12's undated face sheet revealed resident is a [AGE] year-old Female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with mild cognitive impairment (early-stage memory loss), cerebral palsy (congenital disorder of movement, muscle tone, or posture), and cognitive communication deficit (difficulty with thinking and how someone uses language). Record review of Resident #13's undated face sheet revealed resident is a [AGE] year-old Female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including essential primary hypertension (abnormal high blood pressure), dementia (loss of memory), and major depressive disorder (sadness). Record review of Resident #14's undated face sheet revealed resident is a [AGE] year-old Female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia (loss of memory) diabetes (sugar in the blood high glucose), and cognitive communication deficit (difficulty with thinking and how someone uses language). Record review of Resident #15's undated face sheet revealed resident is a [AGE] year-old Female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia (memory loss), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (airflow block with difficulty breathing, and anxiety (feeling of worry). Record review of Resident #16's undated face sheet revealed resident is a [AGE] year-old Female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia (loss of memory), chronic kidney disease (unable to filter blood), and shortness of breath. Record review of Resident #17's undated face sheet revealed resident is an [AGE] year-old Male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (blocked airflow with difficulty breathing), diabetes (sugar in blood high glucose), and hypertension (pressure in blood vessels to high). Record review of Resident #18's undated face sheet revealed resident is a [AGE] year-old Female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including edema (swelling), essential primary hypertension (abnormal high blood pressure), and chronic kidney disease (not able to filter blood). Record review of Resident #19's undated face sheet revealed resident is a [AGE] year-old Male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hypertension (pressure in blood vessels to high), major depressive disorder (sadness), and chronic embolism (blockage of pulmonary arteries). Record review of the facility list of COVID positive residents revealed that Resident #1 through Resident #19 were positve for COVID on 12/12/23 through 12/19/23. In an observation on 12/22/23 between 11:50 PM and 12:00 PM staff were observed with no N-95 mask on assisting residents with room doors open. Observed staff with no faceshields assiting COVID positive residents. Observed staff going into COVID positive rooms with surgical masks and PPE gowns not placed on correctly with no face shields. Observed no N-95 mask worn by staff assisting residents with COVID. Observed COVID positive resident's doors were open along with non-COVID residents while staff was assisting in between residents. Observed no PPE set up at the doors of the COVID positive residents on Halls 1,2, and 3. In an interview with the Business Office Manager on 12/22/22 at 12:00 PM, she stated there were 18 residents positive for COVID-19 and the outbreak started on 12/12/23. There were no warm or hot halls and all the residents in the facility were in their rooms. The Business Office Manager stated the surgical mask was what staff had been wearing to care for the residents and the surgical mask was the only mask available to the staff. The Business Office Manager could not give a reason as to why the N-95 mask or face shields was not available to staff and that she was filling in to help since the interim Administrator, the DON, and the ADON were out sick. In an interview with CNA A on 12/22/22 at 12:18 PM, she stated on 12/08/23 the DON/ADON locked the COVID tests in the office as they did not want to test residents and follow the COVID guidelines of wearing masks and PPE. The residents were showing signs of illness and symptoms on 12/08/23 and the DON and the ADON were notified. CNA A stated the breakout of COVID began on 12/12/23 and there were currently 18 residents positive. CNA A stated during the outbreak PPE was not encouraged to be worn and some staff were seen not using masks or protective gear when the outbreak occurred. Staff had to redirect the COVID positive residents back into their rooms when they came out into the halls without masks. CNA A stated no staff in the building were wearing N-95 masks or face shields during the outbreak or while caring for residents. CNA A stated that there were no N-95 masks in the building and did not know why. CNA A stated she had not had any recent training on Infection Control or protocol to follow during the outbreak. In observations on 12/22/23 between 1:05 PM and 1:30 PM, the Rehab Director was passing out food trays on hall 5 to COVID positive and non-COVID positive residents without an N-95 mask, no face shield, PPE gown was not properly fastened, and without gloves. In an interview with The Rehab Director on 12/22/23 at 1:30 PM, stated the surgical mask that she was wearing was the only mask they had in the building. The Rehab Director stated the surgical mask was what she had been using to care for the residents with COVID. The Rehab Director could not give me a reason as to why there were not any N-95 masks, or face shields in the building or who the Infection Control Preventionist was. The Rehab Director stated she did not have face a shield on passing trays to Covid positive residents as there were not any in the building and she stated she used hand sanitizer when she came out of resident's rooms. The Rehab Director stated she had not had any recent training in infection control. In observations on 12/22/23 between 1:45 PM and 2:00 PM revealed LVN A without an N-95 mask, face shield, and PPE gown not properly fastened on hall 1 assisting COVID positive residents. In an interview with LVN A om 12/22/23 at 2:00 PM stated that she did not want to be named in fear of retaliation. LVN A stated it was known that COVID Positive residents were on the same hall as non-COVID residents. LVN A stated she had not had any training recently on COVID. LVN A stated the surgical mask that she was wearing was the only mask they had in the facility. There were no N-95 masks in the facility or face shields. The surgical mask is what she used when she cared for COVID positive residents. LVN A stated around December 8th, 2023 the DON and the ADON withheld COVID testing. The DON/ADON were aware that residents had become ill. LVN A stated she felt that the DON and the ADON did not want to deal with testing the residents. LVN A stated she observed staff not wearing PPE or surgical masks during the outbreak. LVN A stated that when she was given direction by the DON/ADON to test residents that was when she tested the residents. LVN A stated she last tested residents for COVID on 12-19-2023. 18 were positive on 12-19-2023. LVN A stated she did not know who the infection control preventionist was and she believed the COVID transmission came from not wearing the proper PPE during the outbreak. Attempted to interview on 12/22/23 between 2:44 PM and 3:29 the interim Administrator, the DON, and the ADON. The Business Office Manager stated they were all out sick. Left voice mail messages for a return call with no call returned while in the facility. In an interview with LVN B on 12/22/23 at 4:18 PM, she stated the surgical masks were what staff used to care for the residents. There were no N-95 masks and did not know the reason why there were not any in the facility with the outbreak. LVN B observed staff not wearing PPE properly. Residents with COVID were redirected back in their rooms when they came out in the halls. In an interview with The Regional Director on 12/22/23 at 4:47 PM, she stated that the facility followed the CDC guidelines along with the facility policy. The Regional Director stated she was on the road driving and unsure and unable to quote the policy on isolation of residents and the surgical masks being worn during the outbreak. The Regional Director stated the Infection Control Preventionist at the facility was the DON/ADON. Record review of the policy on hand hygiene dated (revised August 2019) revealed hand hygiene was the primary means of preventing the spread of infection. Hand hygiene should be done before and after direct contact with residents. Record review of the undated policy on donning and doffing revealed 1. Identify and gather the proper PPE to DONN 2. Perform hand hygiene using hand sanitizer 3. Put on isolation gown 4. Put on approved N-95 filtering facepiece respirator or higher 5. Put on face shield or goggles 6. Put on gloves 7 Health care professional may now enter patient room. To DOFF 1. Remove gloves 2. Remove gown, 3. Health care professionals may now exit patient room. 4. Perform hand hygiene 5. Remove face shield or goggles 6. Remove and discard respirator (or facemask if used instead of respirator) 7. Perform hand hygiene after removing the respirator/facemask. Record review of the policy on infection prevention and COVID-19 revised 09/15/23 revealed, an infection prevention and control program is established and maintained to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Source control healthcare personnel will wear recommended PPE when caring for those in transmission base precaution status regardless of community transmission rates or outbreak status. For all Quarantine and isolation rooms 1. Post signs on the door or wall outside the resident's room that clearly describe the type of precautions needed and require PPE. 2. All PPE is single use per room encounter 3. Make PPE, including facemasks, eye protection, gowns, and gloves, available immediately outside of the resident room [ROOM NUMBER]. Perform hand hygiene upon exiting patient room [ROOM NUMBER]. Minimize contact with Quarantine and Isolated residents by bundling time in the room, utilizing technology when feasible and applicable avoiding creating unnecessary isolation or unnecessary mobility limitations. This was determined to be an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 12/22/23 at 6:13 PM. The corporate nurse was notified. The corporate nurse was provided with the IJ template on 12/22/23 at 6:13 PM The following Plan of Removal submitted by the facility was accepted on 12/24/23 at 3:37 PM: Immediately on December 22, 2023, N-95 masks were brought to the facility and made available to all staff. All staff were given an N-95 mask and staff working confirmed to be wearing by Corporate Clinical Specialist (CCS). The staff were required to wear N-95 masks while providing care or working with COVID 19 residents. An order for additional masks was placed by Regional [NAME] President of Operations. The DON will be responsible for ordering PPE for the facility and tracking via par levels. PPE will be kept in a centralized storage room on hall 100 as of December 22, 2023, and ongoing. All staff will be inserviced on location of PPE on December 22, 2023. They will be inserviced before the start of their next shift. Immediately on December 22, 2023, the doors to the COVID rooms were closed. Corporate Clinical Specialist was responsible for ensuring doors were closed and completed on December 22, 2023 Immediately on December 22, 2023, the COVID 19 residents were moved from the non-COVID 19 residents. Corporate Clinical Specialist was responsible and completed on December 22, 2023. Immediately on December 22, 2023, CCS in-serviced the DON and the LNFA on Infection Control policy and procedures to include proper masks required for COVID 19 outbreak, PPE, and the protocol for closing of the doors for the COVID 19 positive residents. In-service was completed on December 22, 2023. The Medical Director was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy and the plan of removal by Corporate Clinical Specialist on December 22, 2023. The Medical Director did not have any further recommendations. On December 22, 2023, the CCS initiated in-services with the staff. In-services included the following: Infection control policy and procedures to include masking when in outbreak, PPE, and the protocol for closing of the doors for COVID 19 positive residents. The completion date for staff in-services and competency evaluations was December 22, 2023. Nursing staff will not be allowed to work until in-service has been completed. In-services was completed on December 22, 2023. The above training material which included the Infection Control policy and procedures to include proper masks required for COVID 19, PPE, location of PPE, and the protocol for closing of the doors for COVID 19 positive residents will be incorporated into the new hire nursing orientation by the CCS, effective December 22, 2023, and ongoing. PRN staff and agency staff will be trained by the DON/Designee prior to being allowed to work the floor. In order to monitor the current residents for potential risk, the DON/designee will monitor the facility COVID status daily and masking of employees starting December 22, 2023 and will continue for 90 days. The DON compliance will be monitored weekly by Corporate Clinical Specialist for 90 days. The facility QA Committee will meet weekly for the next eight weeks starting December 22, 2023, to review compliance with the plan of action. If no further concerns are noted, will continue to monitor as per routine facility QA Committee. POR monitoring . In an observation on 12/23/23 at 9:45 AM there was no hand sanitizer in the dispenser next to room [ROOM NUMBER] and the door marked storage. In an interview with LVN C on 12/23/23 at 10:10 AM, LVN C stated that there were only four COVID positive residents in the facility today. All other COVID positive residents came off isolation as of today. LVN C stated today was the 11th day from the date of a positive COVID test. In an interview with Resident #19 on 12/23/23 at 10:15 AM, she stated that staff used gloves, but he had not observed any hand sanitation or handwashing. Resident #19 stated that the facility should have taken COVID seriously a month ago and not just now. Resident #19 stated he had told, unnamed staff and titles unknown, that he wanted a booster and did not get one. Resident #19 stated that when he went to Wal-Mart pharmacy to pick up his glasses, thatwas when he received the COVID immunization. In an observation on 12/23/23 at 10:24 AM all staff were seen wearing N-95 masks. In an interview with ADON B on 12/23 23 at 11:26 AM, she stated there were approximately seven staff overall who had not been in-serviced on COVID policy/procedures, PPE, and hand hygiene at this time. ADON B stated the DON is in-servicing staff by phone from home and she did not have the exact number of staff left that needed to be in-serviced. Record review on 12/23/23 at 11:30 AM revealed in-service content and sign-in sheet, employee check-off sheets on hand hygiene, use of PPE, and the in-service post-test. In an interview with CNA B on 12/23/23 at 11:55 AM, she stated that she received the in-service training on PPE and hand hygiene. CNA B stated that the PPE were kept outside the COVID-19 positive resident's doors. CNA B was able to state who to notify when PPE runs low when caring for COVID residents. CNA B stated that she needed to wear an N-95 mask when caring for COVID positive residents. In an interview with LVN C on 12/23/23 at 11:56 AM, she stated she checked off on FaceTime video 12/22/23 for in-service on hand hygiene and the use of PPE with the DON. LVN C stated the facility had enough PPE and she knew who to notify when PPE was low. In an interview with Housekeeper A on 12/23/23 at 12:00 PM, she stated the facility had enough PPE and she was aware who to notify when supplies ran low. Housekeeper A stated she was in-serviced this morning on hand hygiene and applying PPE. Housekeeper A stated she had been trained to wear an N-95 mask when treating COVID positive rooms. In an interview with Housekeeper B on 12/23/23 at 12:05 PM, she stated that she was in-serviced this morning on hand hygiene and applying PPE. Housekeeper B stated she had the PPE necessary to clean COVID positive rooms. Housekeeper B stated she was trained to wear an N-95 mask when there were COVID positive residents in the facility. In an interview with ADON B on 12/23/23 at 12:15 PM, she stated she had confirmed that there were seven staff left to be in-serviced. ADON B stated messages had been left for those staff to indicate that they would not work again until they had been in-serviced. In an observation on 12/23/23 at 12:24 PM ADON B was able to show what the equipment was cleaned with. The equipment was cleaned with Micro-Kill one germicidal alcohol wipes. ADON B was able to show the supply of containers available. In an observation on 12/23/23 at 12:30 PM all hand sanitizers that were wall-mounted outside the doors of each room was found to be working with the exception of the one outside room [ROOM NUMBER] that was observed earlier. CNA B was observed using disinfecting wipes to wipe down the Hoyer lift. CNA B stated that the equipment was wiped down after use so that it was clean for the next resident. CNA B stated the disinfecting wipes were used to wipe down equipment on multiple residents. In an observation on 12/25/23 at 11:50 AM of PPE supply in the facility: 3 COVID Positive Rooms: There were plastic bins placed outside of the rooms filled with PPE. Inside of the rooms are biohazard boxes (one for trash and one for laundry). Storage Rooms: On Hall 100, there were 3 different storage rooms. One for PPE, one for the biohazard materials, and one for supplies. Positive Resident's Doors The doors were observed to be closed with bins located outside of the rooms stocked with PPE. Record review of the below In-service Training Reports and Sign-In Sheets for: 1) PPE - COVID - Droplet Precaution - 12/22/2023 2) Handwashing - Hand Sanitizer - 12/22/2023 3) COVID/Infection Control (COVID-19 Policy and Procedures) - 12/22/2023 4) Handwashing, PPE, and Infection Control Policy, Proper Masking During COVID - 12/22/2023 5) PPE - COVID+ Residents and location - 12/22/2023 6) COVID In-service: -N-95 masks must be worn at all times -Proper PPE when entering positive COVID residents' rooms -Remove PPE prior to leaving positive COVID residents' rooms -N-95 must be changed as well -Proper hand hygiene -Encourage all residents' doors to remain closed with Positive COVID status -Donning/Doffing -Proper wearing of PPE Training Material: Observed the Clinical Performance Evaluation Checklist: Handwashing completed and signed on 12/22/2023 and 12/23/2023. Each staff member received a satisfactory checkmark. In an interview with The Activities Director on 12/25/23 at 12:20 PM, she stated that she was contacted by phone on 12/22/23 and was in-serviced on COVID protocol. The Activities Director stated she was contacted by the DON and that she did not learn anything new it was a refresher to her. The Activities Director stated she had passed the quiz and when she worked with a COVID resident she used full PPE. The activities Director stated prior to the exit of the resident's room she doffed inside the room and disposed of all the PPE in the biohazard box. The Activities Director stated everyone that was positive should have been moved to one hall to control the spread. The Activities Director stated they should not have allowed a positive resident to remain in the room with their negative roommate. The Activities Director stated she was told to pull the curtain as that was going to protect the negative resident. In an interview with RN A on 12/25/23 at 12:35 PM, she stated she was in-serviced on handwashing policies and procedures. RN A stated you must separate positive residents from negative residents and wear N-95 masks whenever there is an outbreak. RN A stated she completed the in-service with the DON and completed a quiz. RN A stated she learned to put her gown, mask, face shield, and gloves on. In an interview with LVN D on 12/25/23 at 12:50 PM, she stated she was in-serviced on wearing N-95 masks at all times during a COVID outbreak. LVN D stated that residents cannot be commingled with positive and negative. LVN D stated the door must remain closed for all positive residents and PPE is kept outside of each room. LVN D stated handwashing and proper hand hygiene must be ongoing. LVN D stated you must Donn in full PPE prior to entering the room and Doff prior to exiting. In an interview with CNA C on 12/25/23 at 1:05 PM, she stated she was in-serviced on handwashing, properly wearing PPE, and Infection Control procedures. CNA C stated she completed the in-service with the DON. CNA C stated she did not learn anything new and that it was more of a refresher. CNA C stated although she already knew these things, they were not being implemented in the facility. In an interview with Housekeeper C on 12/25/23 at 1:15 PM, she stated prior to entering the resident's rooms she must suit up in full PPE. Housekeeper C stated she wiped down all high-touch areas in the rooms, especially the bedside tables. Housekeeper C stated before exiting the room she would unsuit and leave all the used PPE in the biohazard box. Housekeeper C stated she kept hand sanitizer on her cart at all times. Housekeeper C stated the in-service was a refresher for her. In an interview with The Dietary Manager on 12/25/23 at 1:30 PM, she stated she was in-serviced on separating positive residents from negative residents, proper PPE, handwashing, Infection Control, and COVID Protocol. The Dietaryy Manager stated she did not learn anything new and it was more of a reeducation for her. The Dietary Manager stated her in-service was completed by the DON. In an interview with the interim Administrator on 12/25/23 at 1:40 PM, she stated since the IJ was called they completed in-services for everyone and made sure N-95 masks were in the building. The interim Administrator stated they have completed a QAPI via phone. The interim Administrator stated they have completed a competency on handwashing, closing doors, proper isolation, and completed a 5-question Quiz. The interim Administrator stated they will monitor for the next 8 weeks to ensure everything is done correctly. The interim Administrator was informed the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was removed on 12/24/23 at 3:37 PM. The facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of actual harm to resident health or safety and a scope of pattern due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems that were put into place.
Oct 2023 6 deficiencies 2 IJ
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accord...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for one (Resident #1) of five residents reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to assess and obtain x-ray when Resident #1 began complaining acute pain and her knee/leg was broken in her left leg. The facility failed to order x-ray on 09/18/2023. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was identified and on 09/21/2023 and Immediate Jeopardy template was presented to the facility on [DATE] at 3:37 PM. While the IJ was removed on 09/23/2023 the facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of actual harm at a scope of isolation due to staff needing more time to monitor the plan of removal for effectiveness. This failure placed residents at risk for potential delay in medical intervention, uncontrolled pain, decline in health and a decreased quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 09/22/2023, revealed Resident #1 was an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses which included low back pain ( pain between the lower edge of the ribs), signs symptoms of musculoskeletal system ( mild to severe aches, low back pain, numbness, tingling, atrophy, and weakness), muscle weakness ( a lack of strength in the muscles), osteoporosis without current pathological fracture (generally caused by a fall from a standing height or lower and usually involves the spine, hip or wrist), lack of coordination (uncoordinated movement due to a muscle control problem that causes an inability to coordinate movements) left foot drop ( caused by weakness of the muscles involved in lifting the front part of the foot) and, abnormalities of gait and mobility (when a person is unable to walk in the usually way). Record review of Resident #1's Annual MDS assessment, dated 07/28/2023, reflected Resident #1 had a BIMS score of fifteen, which indicated the residents' cognition was intact. Resident did not reject care. Resident #1 was assessed to require extensive assistance by two staff members for transfers. She required extensive assistance by one staff for bed mobility and toileting. Resident #1 was also assessed to require limited assistance by one staff for personal hygiene. She was assessed require staff to stabilize her when moving from seated to standing position, moving on and off toilet, and surface-to-surface transfer. Resident #1 was on scheduled pain medication and PRN pain medication. She had frequent pain. Resident #1 did not exhibit any behaviors. Record review of Resident #1's Comprehensive Care Plan completed on 08/17/2023 reflected Resident #1 had an ADL self-care performance deficit. Interventions: resident required extensive assistance by two staff members. Resident #1 required extensive assistance by one staff members with bed mobility. Resident #1 was at risk for falls related to gait/balance problems. She had limited physical mobility. Resident had chronic pain related to osteoporosis (a condition when bone strength weakens) Interventions: anticipate the resident's need for pain relief and respond immediately to any complaint of pain. Identify and record previous pain history and management of that pain and impact of function. Identify previous response to analgesia including pain relief, side effects and impact on function. Monitor/ document for probable cause of each pian episode. Remove/limit causes where possible. Resident #1's further interventions were: Monitor/document for side effects of pain medication. Administer analgesia as per orders. Give ½ hour before treatments or care. Notify the physician if interventions are unsuccessful or if current complaint is a significant change from resident's experience of pain. Provide the resident and family with information about pain and options available for pain management. Discuss and resident preferences . Record review of Resident #1's nurses notes dated 09/18/2023 at 6:50 PM, reflected pain medication was given by mouth every four hours for pain. Resident #1 complained of left knee pain and requested pain medication. Record review of Resident #1's nurses notes dated 09/18/2023 at 8:10 PM, reflected the MD was notified of resident complain of pain to the left knee and left knee slightly swollen, awaiting return call. Record review of Resident #1's nurses notes dates 09/18/2023 at 9:14 PM, reflected the MD returned call and received an order for an x-ray to left knee. Record review of Resident #1's nurses notes dated 09/18/2023 at 11:41 PM, reflected pain medication was given by mouth every four hours as needed for pain. Resident #1 reported pain to knee. ( Did not specify which knee). Record review of Resident #1's nurses note dated 09/19/2023 at 1:05 AM, reflected the pain medication was effective and follow-up pain scale was zero Record review of Resident #1's nurses note dated 09/19/2023 at 4:15 AM, reflected the pain medication was given to the resident. Resident #1 complaining of pain in left knee and requested pain medication. Record review of Resident #1's nurses note dated 09/19/2023 at 8:09 AM, reflected report received from LVN A concerning Resident #1 had an order for left knee x-ray. LVN B notified the X-ray company and was informed x-ray company would be at the facility as soon as possible. Resident aware. Signed by LVN B Record review of Resident #1's nurses note dated 09/19/2023 at 10:05 AM, reflected Was the resident in pain? 0-no pain, 1-3 - mild, 4-6- moderate, 7-10- severe. Every shift follows MD orders. Resident #1 complained of pain to left knee. Record review of Resident #1's nurses notes dated 09/19/2023 at 10:06 AM, reflected pain medication administered. Give one tablet by mouth every four hours as needed for pain. Record review of Resident #1's nurses notes dated 09/ 19/2023 at 10:26 AM, reflected the X-Ray company was unable to do the x-ray at the facility for resident #1 left knee. Resident #1 will be transferred via EMS to a hospital for x-ray to left knee. Resident #1 aware and notified family. Record review of Resident #1's nurses notes dated 09/19/2023 at 10:44 AM, reflected EMS at the facility to transport resident to hospital. Record review of Resident #1's nurses notes dated 09/19/2023 at 10:47 AM , reflected the pain medication was ineffective and follow-up pain was a five. Resident #1 transferred to emergency room for evaluation and treatment. Record review of Resident #1's hospital records from the emergency room hospital A dated 09/19/2023 reflected Resident #1 was transferred by EMS with a complaint of knee pain. She was being transferred between the bed and wheelchair yesterday (09/18/2023) in the facility where she resided when her knee twisted and then became painful and swollen. EMS reported she was given 7.5 milligram of pain medication this AM (09/19/2023) for pain. The EMS did not know the time the pain medication was administered. admission: Urgent, admission Source: Nursing Home. Nursing Assessment: extremity lower. There was obvious swelling to the knee and there appeared to be slight angulation (two ends of the broken bone are at an angle to each other) of the leg. No bruising or open wounds noted to the knee. Record review of Resident #1's doctors notes from the emergency room Hospital A dated 09/19/2023 reflected Resident #1was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] from the nursing home where she resided. On 09/18/2023 Resident #1 was being rotated out of her wheelchair when the staff heard a popping noise from her left knee, and she had called out in pain. The staff noticed on 09/19/2023 the knee continued to be swollen and very painful for the patient when she was moving her knee. Resident #1 was transferred to emergency room for evaluation for possible knee dislocation or knee fracture or any injury. Resident #1was able to express that she felt a significant amount of pain when her left knee was mobilized. The x-ray result reflected Resident #1 had traumatic fracture of the distal femur ( where the bone flares out like an upside-down funnel). Record review of Resident #1's emergency room clinical course and plan reflected, Resident #1 had a distal femur fracture. The fracture was acutely comminuted fracture (a type of fracture where broken bones fracture into more than three separate pieces). Resident #1's pain was under control if the leg was immobile. Two rigid boards were placed on the side of the knee and an ace bandage was used to wrap around the knee for compression and stability. Resident #1 would be transferred to a hospital with orthopedics. Resident #1 required a higher level of care. Record review of Resident #1's emergency room history and physical from a hospital B dated 09/20/2023 reflected chief complaint of Resident #1: Left knee pain after hearing a pop, being lifted from wheelchair to bed. Resident #1 was transferred from the nursing home following left knee pain during the time when the staff were trying to transition her from her wheelchair to her bed. There was a popping noise and Resident #1 had immediate pain. Resident #1 was seen today (09/20/2023) in the hospital bed with her left leg splinted. Imaging studies reflected: X-ray of the left knee, two views reflected impression, acute mildly comminuted fracture of the distal femur medtadiaphysis (a type of fracture where broken bones fracture more than three separated places - medtadiaphysis is a term used to describe the combined region of a long bone and the shaft of the bone. Lesions that span both regions). Plan: to admit to surgical unit. Record review of Resident #1's pain assessments reflected there was only one pain assessment completed from 07/21/2023 through 09/19/2023. Record review of Resident #1's pain assessment dated [DATE] reflected Resident #1 had been in pain for the past five days. She frequently had pain. Resident #1 was assessed she had difficulty completing her day-to-day activities as related to her pain. Her pain was moderate. Resident #1 was on scheduled pain medication. Signed by MDS Coordinator. Record review of the Daily Nurses Schedule for 09/18/2023 for the 6:00 PM - 6:00 AM shift reflected LVN A was the only nurse in the facility. The staff did not have another nurse in the facility to report of Resident #1's pain and knee swelling. Observation on 09/20/2023 of Resident #1's electronic monitoring video supplied by family revealed on 09/18/2023 at 05:52 PM COTA/ Marketing Coordinator and PTA began to transfer Resident #1 from her wheelchair to her bed. Resident #1 was not yelling or complaining about pain. Resident #1 was transferred to her bed and as soon as she sat on the bed, she began to yell my knee is hurting my knee is broken. Observation on 09/20/2023 of Resident #1's electronic monitoring video supplied by family revealed on 09/18/2023 at 05:53 PM Resident #1 was yelling my knee is hurting and my leg broken. Resident #1 began to rub her left leg as she continued to yell. Observation on 09/20/2023 of Resident #1's electronic monitoring video supplied by family revealed on 09/18/2023 Resident #1 continued to yell when staff would touch her left leg or move her left leg. Resident would scream she was hurting. Observation on 09/20/2023 of Resident #1's electronic monitoring video supplied by family revealed on 09/18/2023 at 6:00 PM, Resident #1 stated you ( PTA) turned me around and Resident #1 was looking at PTA as she made this statement. The PTA stated, we did not mean to hurt you. Observation on 09/20/2023 of Resident #1's electronic monitoring video supplied by family revealed on 09/18/2023 at 7:58 PM, CNA H was in Resident #1 room she lifted Resident #1 left leg up and Resident # 1 began to scream, and CNA let the left leg fall onto the bed and began to exit Resident #1 room. CNA H was not providing care to Resident #1. Resident #1 was screaming the entire time she lifted her leg and when she lowered the left leg on the bed. Resident #1 was not yelling prior to CNA H picking up her leg. She stated as she was walking out Resident #1's room , you have that camera in your room, and you are acting all crazy. In an interview on 09/20/2023 at 2:41 PM the COTA/ Marketing Coordinator stated she heard Resident #1 yelling for help around 6:00 PM on 09/18/2023. She stated when she entered Resident #1 room approximately 6:05 PM Resident #1 was needing assistance to be transferred to bed from her recliner. She stated she explained to resident she needed to find a gait belt and get someone to help her with the transfer. The COTA/ Marketing Coordinator stated she asked the PTA C to assist her transferring Resident #1. She stated PTA assisted her with Resident #1's transfer from the recliner to wheelchair. She stated Resident #1 complained about back pain. COTA/Marketing Coordinator also stated Resident #1 wheelchair was positioned beside the bed to transfer onto her bed. She stated she was in front of the resident, and they placed the gait belt on resident and assisted her from the wheelchair and pivoted resident for her to sit on the bed. She stated resident was not yelling during the transfer, however, within a few seconds of resident sitting on the bed the resident began to yell my knee hurts. She stated Resident #1 repeated stating her knee hurts. COTA/ Marketing Coordinator stated she and the PTA C assisted resident to lie in bed in supine position and this is when she noticed Resident #1's knee begins to swell. She stated Resident #1 complained of her pain being at 10 on a pain scale of 0 being in no pain to 10 being in extreme pain. She stated the PTA stayed in the room and she left the room to report this to the LVN A approximately 6:30 PM She stated LVN A did not go to Resident #1's room to assess resident. She stated LVN A was at her nurses' cart preparing to administer medications. She stated she explained to LVN A Resident #1 was in extreme pain in her left knee and the knee was swelling. She stated she stayed at the facility until she knew Resident #1 was going to be seen by the nurse. She stated it was approximately 8:30 PM when the nurse entered Resident #1's room for the first time after reported to LVN A of Resident being in pain. She stated she did become frustrated with LVN A ignoring Resident #1 pain and knee swelling that she told her just give me the medicine and she will give it to her. She stated she could not stand to see Resident #1 in pain any longer and the nurse would not come to the Resident #1's room. The COTA/ Marketing coordinator stated she got the pain medication from the nurse and took it to Resident and gave the pain medication to Resident #1. She stated she reported to LVN A Resident #1 was complaining her leg/knee was broken and LVN A stated resident is always complaining about something hurting this was not anything new. The COTA/ Marketing Coordinator stated she was so upset because she stated she kept reporting to LVN A about Resident #1's condition with her left knee and she continued to ignore her. She also stated she called the Administrator on 09/18/2023 ( did not recall the time). She stated she informed the Administrator of Resident #1 had pain and swelling in the left knee. She stated the Administrator advised her to speak with the nurse and explain to the nurse to call the MD and have x-rays ordered. She stated she spoke with LVN A and explained the Administrator stated to call the MD and have x-rays ordered. She stated LVN A was organizing to pass out medications and began to pass medications and there was not an emergency occurring where she could not stop what she was doing and come to Resident #1's room. She stated she did not feel comfortable leaving Resident #1 on 09/18/2023 due to LVN A not coming to Resident #1's room to complete an assessment on her or giving her pain medication when Resident #1 was in pain more than an hour before LVN D gave me the pain medication to give to Resident #1. She stated she had to do something because Resident #1's left knee swelling was increasing, and the pain was getting a lot worse. She also stated LVN A stated Resident #1's left knee doesn't look any different than it has in the past. LVN A told COTA/Marketing Coordinator and PTA C to go home she had this and promised to take care of Resident # 1. The PT/Marketing Coordinator stated when she came on duty on 09/19/2023 the ambulance was in front of the facility transferring Resident #1 to the hospital for x-rays. She stated she saw Resident #1 being transferred to the ambulance. She stated she was shocked and could not believe LVN A allowed Resident #1 to remain in the facility that night without getting an x-ray or doing anything to ensure Resident #1 did not have any broken bones. She stated after she got home, she was afraid Resident #1 might have known she had a broken bone, and she may lie in the bed all night without any treatment. In an interview on 09/20/2023 at 8:11 PM Resident #1's family member stated he reviewed the video in Resident #1's room from his house. He stated on 09/18/2023 when the COTA and PTA transferred Resident #1 from the wheelchair to the bed Resident #1 began yelling as soon as she sat on the bed that her knee was hurting, and her leg was broken . He stated she was rubbing her left leg. He stated the COTA and PTA C assisted the resident in her bed and she continued to yell. He stated his concern was the staff allowed Resident #1 to lay in the bed until the next day in pain and complaining her leg was broken and they did not do anything but put an ice pack on her knee and put a small pillow under her left knee. He also stated everything was on the video of what occurred, and the facility failed to provide Resident #1 care when she was in extreme pain and complaining her leg was broken. In an interview on 09/21/2023 at 11:00 AM, attempted to contact LVN A and was unable to leave message. LVN A was in the facility when Resident #1 was in pain. In an interview on 09/21/2023 at 11:05 AM, attempted to contact CNA H and left voice message of name, agency, and phone number. CNA H was in Resident #1 room for a short time when Resident #1 was in pain on 09/18/2023 In an interview on 09/21/2023 at 11:10 AM, attempted to contact CNA I and left voice message of name, agency and phone number . CNA I was in the facility and was in Resident #1's room when she was in pain. In an interview on 09/21/2023 at 12:00 PM, PTA C stated the COTA/ Marketing Coordinator asked her to help her to transfer Resident #1 from her recliner to the wheelchair and then to the bed. She stated this occurred approximately 6:00 PM. She stated Resident #1 was transferred from the recliner to the wheelchair and Resident #1 complained about her back hurting after the transfer. She stated Resident #1 was assisted by the bed in her wheelchair to prepare for the transfer from the wheelchair to the bed. She stated once Resident #1 was in her wheelchair by the bed she was calm and quit complaining about her back hurting. PTA C stated the COTA/ Marketing Coordinator was in front of resident and placed the gait belt around the resident waist. She stated they began to transfer Resident #1 to the bed and as soon as they pivoted Resident #1 onto the bed, she began to yell my knee hurts. PTA C stated she assumed it was similar of her complaining about her pain in her back. She stated Resident #1 at some point stated her left leg was broken. PTA C also stated she realized this was a different type of pain than what she has complained in the past. She stated COTA/ Marketing Coordinator left the room to report to LVN A. She stated they kept waiting on pain medication or the nurse to come assess Resident #1 due to her knee continued to swell and was becoming larger. She stated Resident #1 would yell in pain when her leg was barely touched or moved. Resident #1 would rub her knee and below the knee onto her left leg and stated it was broken. PTA C stated LVN A would not come to Resident #1 room to give her pain medication or assess her. She stated the nurse gave COTA/ Marketing Coordinator the pain medication and the COTA/ Marketing Coordinator gave Resident #1 pain medication. PTA C stated she did not recall the time, but she thought it was around 7:00 PM. She stated LVN A entered Resident #1's room approximately 8:30 PM. She stated she was in the room while LVN A talked to Resident #1. PTA C stated LVN A looked at Resident #1's knee approximately 5 seconds and stated her knee is fine. PTA C stated LVN A did not assess Resident #1 or ask her if she hurting in other areas. She stated LVN A did not ask Resident #1 what her pain level was or if the pain medication was effective. She also stated LVN A did not realize PTA C was in the room. PTA C stated when LVN A saw her in the room she stated oh are you a family member I didn't know anyone was in the room. PTA C stated no I am not a family member I am a Physical Therapist Assistant at this facility, and I helped assist Resident #1 to be when she began complaining about her knee. PTA C stated LVN A did not ask her any questions about the transfer or anything about Resident #1. PTA C stated she informed LVN A that she and COTA/ Marketing Coordinator had been in the room with Resident #1 since around 6:00 PM after she began complaining about pain in left knee and stating her left leg was broken. She stated LVN A walked out of the room and stated she is fine she always complains about pain. She also stated LVN A was preparing to pass out medications and began to pass out meds to residents and there was not an emergency. LVN A could have stopped what she was doing and came to Resident #1's room. She also stated LVN A stated Resident #1's left knee does not look any different than it has in the past. LVN A told the COTA/Marketing Coordinator and the PTA C to go home she had this and promised to take care of Resident # 1. In an interview on 09/21/2023 at 2:45 PM the Administrator stated the COTA/ Marketing Coordinator contacted her on 09/18/2023 in the evening. She stated she did not recall the exact time. She stated was informed Resident #1 had pain and some swelling in her left knee. She stated she asked COTA/Marketing Coordinator to inform the nurse to contact the physician and have an x-ray ordered. The Administrator stated anytime a Resident complains of pain whether it is an old or new pain she expected a pain assessment to be completed. She stated LVN A was expected to assess Resident #1 and ask the staff questions and contact the DON with the information. She stated LVN A did not follow protocol of assessing Resident #1,completing a pain assessment, and asked questions reason Resident #1 knee began to swell and why Resident # 1 believed her leg was broken. The Administrator stated Resident #1 needed an x-ray on 09/18/2023 and if the x-ray company could not come to the facility, the nurse was expected to call MD and request for Resident #1 to be sent to the emergency room that night. She stated if Resident #1 was in pain and complaining of her left knee being broken on 09/18/2023, 911 needed to be called and EMS transfer her to the Emergency Room. She stated anytime a Resident complains of pain the nurse was expected to ask the resident where the pain was located , the level of the pain, and to document all this information in the nurses notes and complete a pain assessment. She stated if Resident #1 had a new pain after a transfer, the nurse was expected to ask the staff questions about the transfer, immediately do an assessment, and begin an incident report if needed. She stated the nurse was expected to contact the DON with the information and after she contacted the physician and call 911 to transfer Resident #1 to emergency room. The Administrator stated it was not best practice to have a resident in the facility from the night of 09/18/2023 until the morning of 09/19/2023 in pain with a possible left leg or knee fracture. She stated based on the information she learned today (09/21/2023) of Resident #1's new physical concerns she endured on 09/18/2023 Resident #1 was required to be assessed by a physician in the emergency room and have x-rays on her left leg and left knee as soon as possible on 09/18/2023. She stated the facility had protocols in place to ensure the residents were receiving the best care for their physical condition whether it was a new physical issue or an old physical issue. She stated the nursing staff on 09/18/2023 did not follow the facility's protocol and there was a system failure. She stated it was the DON's responsibility to monitor the nurses to ensure they were following protocol. In an interview on 09/22/2023 at 9:05 AM, LVN B stated Resident #1 did complain about pain frequently. LVN B stated if it was reported to the nurse that Resident #1 was in pain, she would have immediately assessed Resident #1. She stated LVN A did not follow proper protocol to ensure Resident #1 was receiving the medical care she needed the night of 09/18/2023. She stated Resident #1 needed to be transferred to the hospital on [DATE] . LVN B stated she was the oncoming nurse after LVN A. In an interview on 09/22/2023 at 9:55 AM, LVN F stated if any staff reported a resident was having a new pain and their knee was swelling, she stated she would immediately go to that resident's room and assess the resident. She stated she would complete a pain assessment and if resident were in severe pain and has stated her leg was broken, she would contact the MD immediately and if the MD did not return call within 5 minutes, she would immediately call 911. She stated if a nurse did not complete an assessment on the resident or ask the other staff questions of what might have caused the knee to swell, she did not follow proper protocol. LVN F stated nurse was expected to assess residents whenever there is a change of condition and a new pain in the knee with it swelling and the resident yelling her leg was broken that is a change of condition. She stated she did not give care very often to Resident #1, but she did know Resident #1 would yell when she was only in pain. She stated Resident #1 should not have stayed in the facility all night if she said her left leg was broken if her left knee was swelling, and she was in extreme pain . She stated Resident #1 needed to be transferred to the emergency room the night of 09/18/2023. She stated anytime a resident voices pain to a nurse, or another staff reports a resident was in pain the nurses was to complete pain assessment. She stated the nurse was required to ask resident where the pain is located and the pain level using the pain scale of zero - not having any pain and ten- having extreme pain. She stated a nurse was expected to document this in nurses notes when they administer pain medication and if a resident is in pain an assessment was required to be completed. She stated LVN A was expected to go immediately to Resident #1's room to complete an assessment and if Resident #1 was complaining about extreme pain and stated her leg/ knee was broken, Resident #1 needed to be sent to the emergency room immediately. In an interview on 09/22/2023 at 10:30 AM, the ADON stated anytime a Resident had pain whether a new pain or an ongoing pain the nurse was expected to assess the resident and complete a pain scale with the resident. ADON stated pain scale was when zero - no pain and ten- extreme pain. She stated any time a resident reported pain the nurse was to complete a pain assessment and document in the nurses notes where the pain is located and the pain scale. She stated Resident #1 only had one pain assessment completed and it was completed at the time of the MDS Assessment. She stated Resident #1 did complain about pain frequently, however, she expected the nurses to complete pain assessments each time the resident had a pain higher than a zero. She stated the nurses will document pain once a shift on the MAR, however, that does not indicate the resident did not have any pain that shift. The ADON stated there was a pain assessment in the electronic medical record and it was expected for the nurses to complete pain assessment each time a resident complained of being in pain. She stated there was a possibility something else may be occurring with the residents' physical condition and completing an assessment it will ensure the nurse will not be missing any other acute physical issues with the resident. She stated if LVN A had completed a pain assessment on Resident #1 she would have known the extent of the pain and Resident #1 needed to be transferred to the hospital immediately. She also stated if it was reported to LVN A Resident #1 was complaining of her leg being broken the nurse was expected to call 911 immediately, contact the physician and the family. She stated there was a failure in the facility's protocol regarding Resident #1's care on 09/18/2023. In an interview on 09/22/2023 at 1:36 PM, attempted to contact LVN A and was unable to leave message. LVN A was in the facility when Resident #1 was complaining of pain and her left knee hurting Review of Resident #1's Facility Policy on Pain Management Program dated 01/2023 reflected the facility will ensure that residents receive the treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive care plan, and the resident's choices, related to pain management. The facility will assess everyone for pain upon admission to the facility, at the quarterly review, whenever there is a significant change in condition, and when there is onset of new pain or worsening of existing pain. The facility will identify the characteristics of pain such as location, intensity, frequency, pattern , and severity. The facility will use a consistent approach and a standardized pain assessment instrument appropriate to the resident's cognitive level. The facility will evaluate how pain is affecting mood, activities of daily living, sleep, and the resident's quality of life, as well as how pain may be contributing to complications such as gait disturbances, social isolation, and falls. The interdisciplinary team will make attempts to determine root cause of the pain and collaborate with physician to conduct necessary diagnostics and evaluation to identify potential source of pain and determine plan of care. The Administrator and Director of Nurses was notified on 09/21/2023 at 3:37 PM than an Immediate Jeopardy had been identified due to the above failure and an IJ template was provided and POR was requested at this time. The following POR was accepted on 09/23/2023 at 7:38 AM: On 09/21/2023 an abbreviated survey was initiated at (facility). On 09/21/2023 the surveyor provided an Immediate Threat (IT) Template notification that the Regulatory Services has determined that the condition at the facility constitutes an immediate threat to resident health and safety. The notification of Immediate Threat states as follows: On 09/21/2023 an abbreviated survey was initiated at facility. On 09/21/2023 the surveyor provided an Immediate Threat (IT) Template notification that the Regulatory Services has determined that the condition at the facility constitutes an immediate threat to resident health and safety. The notification of Immediate Threat states as follows: F684: Quality of Care Quality of care is a fundamental principle that applies to all treatment and care provided to facility residents. Based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident, the facility must ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices. DON/Designee conducted pain assessment for all residents on September 21, 2023, to ensure that no other resident effected. Documents are in POR binder and uploaded to resident's chart. The facility will follow policy and procedure regarding assessment injuries and pain to protect individuals in similar circumstances. No other residents noted to have injuries. Action Taken: Immediately, on September 21, 2023, Corporate clinical specialist in serviced DON and ADM to include Quality of ca[TRUNCATED]
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate supervision to prevent accident...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for one of five residents (Resident #1) reviewed for injuries and supervision. The facility failed to ensure staff properly transferred Resident #1 from her wheelchair to her bed resulting in a fractured left leg causing severe pain. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was identified 4:37 PM and on 10/18/2023 at and Immediate Jeopardy template was presented to the facility on [DATE] at 4:39 PM. While the IJ was removed on 10/19/2023 at the facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of actual harm at a scope of isolation due to staff needing more time to monitor the plan of removal for effectiveness. This failure could result in residents experiencing accidents, injuries, unrelieved pain, and diminished quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 09/22/2023, revealed Resident #1 was an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses which included low back pain (pain between the lower edge of the ribs), signs symptoms of musculoskeletal system (mild to severe aches, low back pain, numbness, tingling, atrophy, and weakness), muscle weakness (a lack of strength in the muscles), osteoporosis without current pathological fracture (generally caused by a fall from a standing height or lower and usually involves the spine, hip or wrist), lack of coordination (uncoordinated movement due to a muscle control problem that causes an inability to coordinate movements), left foot drop (caused by weakness of the muscles involved in lifting the front part of the foot) and, abnormalities of gait and mobility (when a person is unable to walk in the usually way). Record review of Resident #1's Annual MDS assessment, dated 07/28/2023, reflected Resident #1 had a BIMS score of fifteen, which indicated the resident's cognition was intact. Resident #1 did not reject care. Resident #1 was assessed to require extensive assistance by two staff members for transfers. She required extensive assistance by one staff for bed mobility and toileting. Resident #1 was also assessed to require limited assistance by one staff for personal hygiene. She was assessed to require staff to stabilize her when moving from a seated to standing position, moving on and off the toilet, and surface-to-surface transfers. Resident #1 was on scheduled pain medication and PRN pain medication. She had frequent pain. Resident #1 did not exhibit any behaviors. Record review of Resident #1's Comprehensive Care Plan completed on 08/17/2023 reflected Resident #1 had an ADL self-care performance deficit. Interventions included that the resident required extensive assistance by two staff members with transfers. Resident #1 required extensive assistance by one staff member with bed mobility. Resident #1 was at risk for falls related to gait/balance problems. She had limited physical mobility. Resident had chronic pain related to osteoporosis (a condition when bone strength weakens) Interventions included to anticipate the resident's need for pain relief and respond immediately to any complaint of pain; identify and record previous pain history and management of that pain and impact of function; identify previous response to analgesia(treatment that prevents you from feeling pain while you are awake) including pain relief, side effects and impact on function; monitor/document for probable cause of each pian episode; and remove/limit causes where possible. Resident #1's further interventions were: monitor/document for side effects of pain medication; administer analgesia as per orders; give ½ hour before treatments or care; notify the physician if interventions are unsuccessful or if current complaint is a significant change from resident's experience of pain; provide the resident and family with information about pain and options available for pain management; and discuss and residents' preferences. Record review of Resident #1's nurses notes dated 09/19/2023 at 10:26 AM, reflected the x-Ray company was unable to do the x-ray at the facility for Resident #1's left knee. Resident #1 would be transferred via EMS to the hospital for an x-ray to her left knee. Resident #1 aware and the family was notified. Record review of Resident #1's nurses notes dated 09/19/2023 at 10:44 AM, reflected EMS was at the facility to transport the resident to hospital. Record review of Resident #1's nurses notes dated 09/19/2023 at 10:47 AM, reflected the pain medication was ineffective and follow-up pain was a five (moderately strong pain). Resident #1 was transferred to emergency room for evaluation and treatment. Record review of Resident #1's pain assessments reflected there was only one pain assessment completed from 07/21/2023 through 09/19/2023. Record review of Resident #1's pain assessment dated [DATE] reflected Resident #1 had been in pain for the past five days. She frequently had pain. Resident #1 was assessed she had difficulty completing her day-to-day activities as related to her pain. Her pain was moderate. Resident #1 was on scheduled pain medication. Signed by the MDS Coordinator. Record review of Resident #1's hospital records from the emergency room Hospital A dated 09/19/2023 reflected Resident #1 was transferred by EMS with a complaint of knee pain. She was being transferred between the bed and wheelchair yesterday (09/18/2023) in the facility where she resided when her knee twisted and then became painful and swollen. EMS reported she was given 7.5 milligram of pain medication this AM (09/19/2023) for pain. The EMS did not know the time the pain medication was administered. admission: Urgent, admission Source: Nursing Home. Nursing Assessment: extremity lower. There was obvious swelling to the knee and there appeared to be slight angulation (two ends of the broken bone are at an angle to each other) of the leg. No bruising or open wounds noted to the knee. Record review of Resident #1's doctors note from the emergency room Hospital A dated 09/19/2023 reflected Resident #1was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] from the nursing home where she resided. On 09/18/2023 Resident #1 was being rotated out of her wheelchair when the staff heard a popping noise from her left knee, and she had called out in pain. The staff noticed on 09/19/2023 the knee continued to be swollen and very painful for the patient when she was moving her knee. Resident #1 was transferred to emergency room for evaluation for possible knee dislocation or knee fracture or any injury. Resident #1was able to express that she felt a significant amount of pain when her left knee was mobilized. The x-ray result reflected Resident #1 had traumatic fracture of the distal femur (where the bone flares out like an upside-down funnel). Record review of Resident #1's emergency room clinical course and plan reflected, Resident #1 had a distal femur fracture. The fracture was acutely comminuted fracture (a type of fracture where broken bones fracture into more than three separate pieces). Resident #1's pain was under control if the leg was immobile. Two rigid boards were placed on the side of the knee and an ace bandage was used to wrap around the knee for compression and stability. Resident #1 would be transferred to a hospital with orthopedics. Resident #1 required a higher level of care. Record review of Resident #1's emergency room history and physical from a hospital B dated 09/20/2023 reflected chief complaint of Resident #1: Left knee pain after hearing a pop, being lifted from wheelchair to bed. Resident #1 was transferred from the nursing home following left knee pain during the time when the staff were trying to transition her from her wheelchair to her bed. There was a popping noise and Resident #1 had immediate pain. Resident #1 was seen today (09/20/2023) in the hospital bed with her left leg splinted. Imaging studies reflected: X-ray of the left knee, two views reflected impression, acute mildly comminuted fracture of the distal femur medtadiaphysis (a type of fracture where broken bones fracture more than three separated places - medtadiaphysis is a term used to describe the combined region of a long bone and the shaft of the bone. Lesions that span both regions). Plan: to admit to surgical unit. Observation on 09/20/2023 of Resident #1's electronic monitoring video supplied by the family revealed on 09/18/2023 revealed the following: - At 05:44 PM, the COTA/Marketing Coordinator stated to Resident #1 she had not transferred Resident #1 before and asked Resident #1 if she was able to help during transfers or did, she need a gait belt. The PT/Marketing Coordinator stated she was going to find a gait belt. -At 05:49 PM, the COTA/ Marketing Coordinator and PTA began transferring Resident #1 from the recliner to the wheelchair ( on 09/18/2023 PM). Resident #1 complained about her back hurting but was not yelling. -At 05:52 PM, the COTA/Marketing Coordinator and PTA began to transfer Resident #1 ( by 2 person assist with gait belt) from her wheelchair to her bed in PM. Resident #1 was not yelling or complaining about pain. PTA C was standing behind the wheelchair to the left when COTA/ Marketing Coordinator was standing in front of Resident #1. Resident #1 had her right hand on COTA / Marketing Coordinator upper left arm and her left hand on COTA/ Marketing Coordinator upper right arm. Resident was in wheelchair and the left side of resident was next to the bed. PTA C was standing behind the wheelchair. PTA C had her hand on Resident #1 upper back and continued to stand behind the wheelchair when COTA/Marketing Coordinator transferred Resident #1 from wheelchair to the bed. During the transfer PTA C did grab Resident #1's pants. PTA C was not to the side of resident or in front of resident where she could view Resident #1's left foot or assist with the left foot due to Resident #1 having left foot drop. - Observation on 09/20/2023 of Resident #1's electronic monitoring video supplied by family revealed on 09/18/2023 at 05:53 PM Resident #1 was yelling my knee is hurting and my leg broken. Resident #1 began to rub her left leg as she continued to yell. At 6:00 PM. Resident #1 stated to PTA that they turned her around and Resident #1 was looking at PTA as she made the statement. The PTA stated to Resident #1 they did not mean to hurt her. In an interview on 10/15/2023 at 10:40 AM, LVN D stated Resident #1 required 2 staff assist with a gait belt when Resident #1 was transferred. LVN D stated she had assisted Resident #1 with transfers from her wheelchair to her bed. She stated for a successful transfer with Resident #1 it was easier to place the wheelchair near the bed where there was enough room for one staff be between the bed and the wheelchair. She stated one staff would be on Resident #1's left side and one staff would be on Resident #1's right side. LVN D also stated the staff on the left side of Resident #1 would be observing her left foot to ensure it didn't drag on the floor or would hang on the wheelchair. LVN D stated it was best practice if the left foot (one had the foot drop) was not next to the bed when transferring Resident #1 and her right foot was positioned next to the bed during transfers. She stated if staff transferred Resident #1 this way the left foot would not get caught between the wheelchair and the bed. There were less of a chance the left foot would be injured during transfer She stated Resident #1's had a left foot drop and sometimes she would place the left foot on the floor, however, most of the time she would keep the left foot raised a few inches off the floor during transfer. She stated if no one was on the left side of Resident #1 it would be very difficult to monitor the left foot to ensure it didn't drag on floor or get caught on wheelchair. LVN D also stated this type of transfer was more efficient with Resident #1. She also stated the two staff would have one hand on the gait belt, and the two staff would transfer Resident #1 together with one staff on her left side ensured her left foot was not dragging and not touching the floor. She stated the left foot would be smooth turn with her right foot and it would be in sync at the same time. She stated Resident #1's hips and feet would go at the same time, and it would be a smooth transfer. She stated the most important information with Resident #1's transfer was to watch the left foot. LVN D stated Resident #1 always wore non-skid socks and did not have regular socks in her room. She stated she would have shoes on or her non-skid socks when out of bed and when she was in bed, she preferred to wear her non-skid socks. LVN D stated Resident #1 did have weight bearing on her right foot, however, did not have very much if any weight bearing on her left foot. LVN D stated if someone was behind Resident #1's wheelchair and someone was in front of Resident #1 it would be difficult for anyone to observe her left foot. She stated someone needed to be by the left foot to prevent it from dragging or hitting anything. She stated it was best if the left foot (one had the foot drop) was not next to the bed when transferring Resident #1 and her right foot was positioned next to the bed during transfers. She stated if staff transferred Resident #1 this way the left foot would not get caught between the wheelchair and the bed. There were less of a chance the left foot would be injured during transfer. In an interview on 10/15/2023 at 11:00 AM, CNA M stated she had transferred Resident #1 in the past. She stated she began working at the facility 07/12/2023. She stated she had been assigned to Resident #1 or have assisted other staff in transferring Resident #1 at least 4-5 times per week. CNA M stated Resident #1 had problems with her left foot. She stated she was not capable of placing her left foot on the floor but for a few seconds. She stated Resident #1 did not have but very little weight bearing on her right foot and none on her left foot when she assisted Resident #1 with transfers. CNA M stated Resident #1 was a two person gait belt transfer. She stated there was no issues in transferring Resident #1 when one staff stood on one side of Resident #1 and another staff stood on the other side of Resident #1. She stated the staff on the left side was the one observing the left foot to ensure the left foot did not hit anything or drag on the floor during the transfer. CNA M stated Resident #1 would sometimes put her left foot on the floor during transfer and this is when the staff would reposition her foot. She stated if staff left room between the wheelchair and the bed it was very easily for one staff to be on each side of Resident #1. CNA M also stated Resident #1 would put some weight on her right foot but not all the time when she was assisted to the standing position. She stated Resident #1 left foot required to be watched the entire time of transfers due to having left foot drop and she could put her foot down and not have any control of the left foot. She stated this is why having one person on each side of Resident #1 was very important with her transfer. CNA M stated the staff did most of the transfers with Resident #1. She also stated it would be very difficult to transfer Resident #1 with one staff standing in front of her and one staff behind the wheelchair and hold onto her shirt or pants. She stated who would be observing the left foot and reposition it if needed. She stated Resident #1 left foot needed to be watched during the entire transfer process and someone may need to reposition the foot if it was dragging on the floor or if it hit the wheelchair. She stated unless someone was on each side of Resident #1 no one would be able to reposition the left foot if it was dragging. In an interview on 10/15/2023 at 11:16 AM, TNA N stated she had been a TNA approximately 4 months. She stated she had assisted in transferring Resident #1. She stated Resident #1 left foot would drop and she could not use very much weight on the left foot. She stated she would place her right foot on the floor, however, was not able to use right foot very much. She stated Resident #1 was a two staff person assist using a gait belt. TNA N stated the staff was required to do most of the work when transferring Resident #1. She stated Resident #1 had a left foot drop and the staff needed to watch the left foot when transferring Resident #1. She stated Resident #1 would hold her foot up a few inches off the floor but sometimes would put her left foot down during transfer and this is when the staff on the left side could reposition the left foot. She stated during transfers of Resident #1 one staff always watched her left foot to prevent it from dropping and getting caught in the wheelchair or anything during the transfer. She stated resident was very fragile and everyone needed to be extremely careful when transferring Resident #1. She stated if staff was standing behind Resident #1 and staff in front of Resident #1 that would be very difficult to transfer her due to someone needed to be on her left side to watch the left foot. In an interview on 10/15/2023 at 11:31 AM, the MDS Coordinator/LVN stated Resident #1 required extensive assistance with two staff using a gait belt to transfer Resident #1. She stated Resident #1was minimal weight bearing on right foot when standing. She stated Resident #1 had a left foot drop and was not capable of placing full weight on her left foot. The MDS Coordinator stated when transferring Resident #1 the right foot was expected to be next to the bed. She also stated if the right foot was next to the bed and when staff transferred Resident #1 there was less chance of the left foot getting caught on the wheelchair or dropping her foot on the floor during transfer. She stated one staff needed to be on each side of Resident #1 to observe the left foot and reposition it during transfer if needed. MDS Coordinator stated she had not transferred Resident #1 or observed anyone transfer Resident #1. She stated based on Resident #1's physical condition she needed someone to observe the left foot during transfers. She also stated if a staff was behind Resident #1 and a staff was in front of Resident #1 it would be very difficult for staff to observe the left foot during transfer. She stated with Resident #1 she believed transferring her with one staff on each side of resident was the most efficient transfer. She also stated if a staff made a statement of never transferring Resident #1 and asked Resident #1 what type of transfer did she require, she stated she would assume the staff did not know how to transfer Resident #1. In an interview on 10/15/2023 at 11:45 AM,RN O stated she began working at the facility on 09/16/2023 and 09/17/2023. She stated Resident #1 did not complain of any type of pain in her left leg or left knee the entire weekend. She stated she had never transferred or observed Resident #1 being transferred. She stated she administered medication to Resident #1. She stated all staff should be familiar with what type of transfers each resident required before attempting to transfer a resident. RN O stated the staff was expected to view the electronic medical record to gather information on transfers. She stated it was not appropriate to ask a resident what type of transfer they required and ask if the resident needed a gait belt. She stated any resident may become confused at that time and may give the correct information. In an interview on 10/15/2023 at 12:10 PM, the ADON stated she did not know about Resident #1 weight bearing on either foot. She stated she knew she was receiving PT. The ADON looked at the electronic medical records and reviewed the Physician Orders and stated Resident #1 was not on PT she was on OT. She stated she had not observed any staff transferring Resident #1. She also stated Resident #1 was a two person assist during transfers. ADON stated she expected there be one staff on each side of Resident #1. She stated one staff needed to watch Resident #1's left foot to prevent the left foot from dragging. ADON stated Resident #1's right foot should be next to the bed. She stated during transfer the left foot would not become tangled on the wheelchair or anything else. ADON also stated the therapy department did proper transfers. ADON stated if a staff is in front of Resident #1 and a staff is behind Resident #1 wheelchair during a transfer this would not be considered a proper transfer. In an interview on 10/15/2023 at 2:50 PM, the Administrator stated the facility could not be held responsible for the actions of any employee if the employees did not perform their job correctly. She stated if the staff had been in serviced and received training the facility did all they were required to do, and the facility did nothing wrong. She stated the employees are the ones that needs to be corrected and not the facility. She stated the facility was not responsible for the employees' actions. The Administrator stated she was not clinical and did not know anything about transfers and what was required of transfers. She stated she was the administrator and not clinical whenever asked about the facilities protocol of transfers, injuries, and investigations of injuries. She stated that was clinical responsibility. In an interview on 10/18/2023 at 10:00 AM the Director of Rehabilitation stated Resident #1 was on her caseload for OT. She stated Resident #1's right leg was full weight bearing. She also stated Resident #1 was able to put weight on her left foot as tolerated during therapy sessions. She stated transferred Resident #1 without any other staff assisting her. She stated it was different when residents were in therapy than when the resident was being transferred by CNAs or Nurses. Rehab Coordinator stated she did attend care plans and had attended care plan on Resident #1 and did make suggestions. She stated anytime a staff made suggestions it was discussed as a group. Rehab Coordinator stated she was not required to follow Resident #1's care plan or any residents care plan. The therapy department was not a part of the facility. She stated she did not know what was written on Resident #1's care plan. Rehab Coordinator stated she did attend Resident #1's care plan meetings. She stated she did not know how to answer the question when asked if therapy was expected to follow the facilities care plans. Rehab Coordinator also stated the therapy department was expected to follow Resident #1's care plans. She stated any transfer with Mrs. Hill needed to be very observant during the entire transfer. She stated if a staff asked a resident how they are transferred and if the resident required a gait belt, she believed the staff did not know what type of transfer the resident required. She also stated Resident #1 could be transferred from the front and from the back of the wheelchair. She stated if Resident #1 left leg was dragging or got caught on something the person behind the wheelchair would need to move the wheelchair out of the way to reposition Resident #1's left leg. She also stated there was a possibility of an injury during a transfer with Resident #1 related to her being so fragile. In an interview on 10/18/2023 at 11:35 AM, the Director of Nurses (DON) stated Resident #1 required two staff assistance using a gait belt She stated Resident #1 was very fragile and had left foot drop. She stated during a transfer with Resident #1 her left foot was expected not to be next to the bed. She stated there needed to be enough room between the bed and wheelchair where one person would be on each side of Resident #1. The Director of Nurses stated one staff needed to observe Resident #1's left foot during the transfer to ensure Resident #1 did not drag or hit anything. She stated with the one staff observing the left foot the staff could reposition the left foot as needed or stop the transfer and assist resident to the wheelchair until Resident #1 was ready for the transfer. She stated if staff was behind the resident and staff in front of the resident, she would consider this a one person transfer. She stated with Resident #1 she needed someone to watch the left foot and be able to get to the left foot if it was dragging on the floor or was caught in the wheelchair or anything could happen and someone would need to immediately reposition the left foot She stated if staff was behind the wheelchair during the transfer it would be very difficult for that person to move the wheelchair to reposition Resident #1's left foot. Director of Nurses also stated all staff including therapy was expected to follow residents care plans. She stated therapy care was on the facilities care plans in the electronic medical records and they were expected to follow care plans. In an interview on 10/18/2023 at 2:17 PM, the MDS Coordinator/LVN stated the Therapy Coordinator had attended Resident #1's care plan meetings. She stated all staff in the facility including therapy was expected to follow facilities care plans. She stated she had not been informed of the Therapy Department not attending care plan meetings or follow what is documented on the resident's care plans including transfers. She also stated therapy department has their own interventions on resident problems. MDS Coordinator/ LVN stated the Therapy Coordinator attends care plan meetings and makes suggestions and the suggestions is discussed during the meetings with the interdisciplinary team. In an interview on 10/19/2023 at 10:50 AM, CNA P stated she was not working at this facility when Resident #1 was residing at the facility. She stated she had been a CNA since 1996 and received a lot of training on transfers. She stated she was never taught in all the years of being a CNA for one staff stand behind the wheelchair and a staff stand in front of a resident during a transfer. She stated if a staff is behind the wheelchair and resident had issues with their foot/ leg it would be difficult for the person behind the wheelchair to observe the foot/leg to ensure the leg/foot was not caught on wheelchair or anything during the transfer. CNA P stated the weaker foot needed to be away from the bed and the foot without any issues needed to be next to the bed. She stated that is how she was taught to transfer a resident with weakness or unable to have full weight bearing on a particular foot/ leg. In an interview on 10/19/2023 at 1:15 PM, the Administrator stated I am not answering any questions about transfers. I am not clinical and not responsible for training on transfers. She stated she was in serviced on 10/18/2023 of how to transfer residents using Hoyer lift, two person assist with gait belt and one person assist. She stated she would not answer any questions about transfers related to Resident #1. The administrator left the conference room before finishing the interview. Record review of the facility's policy on Gait Belt Transfer Techniques dated July 2017 reflected two person stand pivot transfer to be utilized when transferring residents who can bear weight through at least one lower extremity and require the assistance of two persons due to weakness, confusion, or weight: 1. Place the gait belt around the resident's waist securely. 2. Bring resident to upright position and to the edge of the surface where they are seated. 3. Place the transfer surfaces at a 45 degree angle to one another and secure breaks. 4. One person stands in the space between the wheelchair and the transfer surfaces ( to the side of the resident) 5. The other person stands in front of the resident to block the knees. 6. Reach around the resident and grasp the belt in the mid back area (avoid grasping on the side due to risk of injury) 7. Assure that the residents' feet are placed firmly on the floor. 8. Bring the resident forward close to your trunk and shift your weight backward while pulling/ guiding the resident up. 9. The person on the side will grasp onto the gait belt and guide the pelvis to the transfer surface. 10. Cue the resident to shift his/her weight and move the feet in small steps towards the transfer surface. 11. Guide/gently lower the resident on to the transfer surface. 12. If needed, the person on the side can move back on the surface while the person in front guides the knees. 13. Once the resident is seated/ positioned safely, remove the gait belt. The Administrator and Director of Nurses was notified on 10/18/2023 at 4:39 PM that an Immediate Jeopardy had been identified due to the above failure and an IJ template was provided. The POR was requested at this time. The following POR was accepted on 10/19/2023 at 10:40 AM and indicated the following: On 09/21/2023 an abbreviated survey was initiated at (facility). On 10/19/2023 at 4:39 PM the surveyor provided an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) Template notification that the Regulatory Services has determined that the condition at the facility constitutes an immediate threat to resident health and safety. The notification of Immediate Threat states as follows: On 09/21/2023 an abbreviated survey was initiated at facility. On 10/19/2023 the surveyor provided an Immediate Threat (IT) Template notification that the Regulatory Services has determined that the condition at the facility constitutes an immediate threat to resident health and safety. Investigate Accidents and Hazards applies treatment and care provided to facility residents. Based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident, the facility must ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices. Action Taken: Monitoring was completed from 10/19/2023 and was as follows: Immediately, the two employees who were reported to have improperly transfer on the video viewed by HHSC were suspended pending investigation. Immediately, on October 18, 2023, all residents plan of care were validated by assessing resident transfer status to ensure they are receiving proper transfer and assistance and Kardex reflects the appropriate level of care by Corporate Clinical Specialist Immediately, on October 18, 2023, Physical Therapist Area Director of Operations in serviced Director of Rehab, DON, and ADON on resident transfers to include policy and procedure for on one person , two person, and Hoyer transfers to follow resident plan of care for transfers and repositioning. In-service will include staff education regarding what to do in the event of an acute change of condition or injury during a transfer. Education to include escalation if the nurse does not respond including calling for alternate nurse, DON, Administrator, or 911 as needed. Training and competency validation by return demonstration for DOR/DON/ ADON was completed on 10/18/2023 by using the transfer, mobility, repositioning techniques checkoff. Training on resident transfers to include policy procedure on one person, two person, and Hoyer transfers staff education regarding what to do in the event of an acute change of condition or injury during a transfer. Education to include escalation if nurse does not respond including calling for alternate nurse, DON, ADM, or 911 as needed material will be incorporated into the new hire nursing orientation by DON/Designee effective October 18, 2023, and ongoing. DON/Designee will monitor compliance of resident transfers by performing observations and competency validation on 2 staff per week for 12 weeks, then every other week for 12 weeks. Thereafter, DON/Designee will monitor residents for safe transfers once [NAME][TRUNCATED]
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free from physical and verbal abuse for one ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free from physical and verbal abuse for one (Resident #1) of five residents reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was protected verbal abuse on 09/18/2023 when CNA H made a derogatory comment regarding Resident #1 within earshot of Resident #1 and failed to assess Resident #1's pain before adjusting her swollen leg. This failure could place residents at risk for injury, mental anguish, depression, intimidation, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included : Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 09/22/2023, revealed Resident #1 was an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses which included low back pain ( pain between the lower edge of the ribs), signs symptoms of musculoskeletal system ( mild to severe aches, low back pain, numbness, tingling, atrophy, and weakness), muscle weakness ( a lack of strength in the muscles), osteoporosis without current pathological fracture (generally caused by a fall from a standing height or lower and usually involves the spine, hip or wrist), lack of coordination (uncoordinated movement due to a muscle control problem that causes an inability to coordinate movements) left foot drop ( caused by weakness of the muscles involved in lifting the front part of the foot) and, abnormalities of gait and mobility (when a person is unable to walk in the usually way). Record review of Resident #1's Annual MDS assessment, dated 07/28/2023, reflected Resident #1 had a BIMS score of fifteen, which indicated the residents' cognition was intact. Resident did not reject care. Resident #1 was assessed to require extensive assistance by two staff members for transfers. She required extensive assistance by one staff for bed mobility and toileting. Resident #1 was also assessed to require limited assistance by one staff for personal hygiene. She was assessed require staff to stabilize her when moving from seated to standing position, moving on and off toilet, and surface-to-surface transfer. Resident #1 was on scheduled pain medication and PRN pain medication. She had frequent pain. Resident #1 did not exhibit any behaviors. Record review of Resident #1's Comprehensive Care Plan completed on 08/17/2023 reflected Resident #1 had an ADL self-care performance deficit. Interventions: resident required extensive assistance by two staff members. Resident #1 required extensive assistance by one staff members with bed mobility. Resident #1 was at risk for falls related to gait/balance problems. She had limited physical mobility. Resident had chronic pain related to osteoporosis (a condition when bone strength weakens) Interventions: anticipate the resident's need for pain relief and respond immediately to any complaint of pain. Identify and record previous pain history and management of that pain and impact of function. Identify previous response to analgesia including pain relief, side effects and impact on function. Monitor/ document for probable cause of each pian episode. Remove/limit causes where possible. Resident #1's further interventions were: Monitor/document for side effects of pain medication. Administer analgesia as per orders. Give ½ hour before treatments or care. Notify the physician if interventions are unsuccessful or if current complaint is a significant change from resident's experience of pain. Provide the resident and family with information about pain and options available for pain management. Discuss and record preferences. Record review of the Daily Nurses Schedule for 09/18/2023 for the 6:00 PM - 6:00 AM shift reflected LVN A was the only nurse in the facility. The staff did not have access to receive assistance for Resident #1 from another nurse. Observation on 09/20/2023 of Resident #1's electronic monitoring video supplied by family revealed on 09/18/2023 at 05:52 PM COTA/ Marketing Coordinator and PTA began to transfer Resident #1 from her wheelchair to her bed. Resident #1 was not yelling or complaining about pain. Resident #1 was transferred to her bed and as soon as she sat on the bed, she began to yell my knee is hurting my knee is broken. Observation on 09/20/2023 of Resident #1's electronic monitoring video supplied by family revealed on 09/18/2023 at 05:53 PM Resident #1 was yelling my knee is hurting and my leg broken. Resident #1 began to rub her left leg as she continued to yell. Observation on 09/20/2023 of Resident #1's electronic monitoring video supplied by family revealed on 09/18/2023 Resident #1 continued to yell when staff would touch her left leg or move her left leg. Resident would scream she was hurting. Observation on 09/20/2023 of Resident #1's electronic monitoring video supplied by family revealed on 09/18/2023 at 6:00 PM, Resident #1 stated you ( PTA) turned me around and Resident #1 was looking at PTA as she made this statement. The PTA stated, we did not mean to hurt you. Observation on 09/20/2023 of Resident #1's electronic monitoring video supplied by family revealed on 09/18/2023 at 7:58 PM, CNA H was in Resident #1's room. She lifted Resident #1's left leg up and Resident #1 began to scream. CNA H let Resident #1's the left leg fall onto the bed and began to exit Resident #1's room. CNA H was not providing care to Resident #1. Resident #1 was screaming the entire time CNA H lifted her leg and when Resident #1 lowered the left leg on the bed. Resident #1 was not yelling prior to CNA H picking up her leg. As she was walking out Resident #1's room she stated you are acting all crazy. In an interview on 09/20/2023 at 8:11 PM Resident #1's family stated he witnessed from the camera in Resident #1's room on 09/18/2023 at 5:51PM, staff breaking Resident #1's leg, Resident #1 complaining of pain and staff saying back to Resident #1 you know you are not hurt. You had complained about your back hurting before too and it was nothing. He stated staff did not call the family to notify them of the incident until 09/19/2023 and an ambulance was called to transfer Resident #1 to the hospital on [DATE]. He also stated a staff came into Resident #1's room on 09/18/2023 ( the staff was identified by the DON as CNA H) and staff picked up Resident #1's leg dropped it back on the bed and stated to Resident #1, she was not hurt. He stated in the video after staff (CNA H) began walking toward the door they stated to Resident #1 you are crazy . He also stated when the staff began to realize Resident #1 was in pain one of the staff turned the volume up on the television where it was difficult at times after these statements to hear what staff was saying. He also stated Resident #1 was in surgical unit at Hospital B and awaiting surgery. He stated Resident #1 was not available for interview. He did not want to show the video to administration except to identify the staff in the video. In an interview/observation on 09/21/2023 at 10:30 AM the Director of Nurses stated if Resident #1 were having severe pain in her left leg and CNA H picked up Resident #1's left leg and did not place the leg gently on the bed with Resident #1 yelling the entire time I would consider this physical abuse. She also stated if CNA H allegedly stated to Resident #1 you are crazy as CNA H was exiting the room this is verbal abuse. She stated staff had been in serviced on abuse and neglect numerous times. She stated this was abuse. The Director of Nurses was required to identify the staff in the video. Director of Nurses viewed the electronic monitoring video provided by the family on 09/21/2023 and observed CNA H pick up Resident #1's leg and lower it and heard CNA H state you are crazy as CNA H was exiting the room. The Director of Nurses stated this was verbal and physical abuse by CNA H. In an interview on 09/21/2023 at 11:00 AM, attempted to contact LVN A and was unable to leave message. LVN A was working the night of 09/18/2023. In an interview on 09/21/2023 at 11:05 AM, attempted to contact CNA H and left voice message of name, agency, and phone number. In an interview on 09/21/2023 at 11:10 AM, attempted to contact CNA I and left voice message of name, agency, and phone number . CNA I was in Resident #1's room when Resident #1 was complaining of pain. CNA I may have heard in the hall what CNA H stated to Resident #1. In an interview on 09/21/2023 at 2:45 PM the Administrator stated if Resident #1 was having severe pain in her left knee and left leg, and if CNA H was aware Resident #1 had pain and was not given care to Resident #1 and lifted her left leg up and resident yelling from pain and did not lay the left leg softly on the bed, she stated that would be considered abuse. She also stated if CNA H was exiting Resident #1's room and allegedly stated you are crazy, that was considered verbal abuse. The Administrator stated it was her, the DON, ADON and all staff's responsibility to monitor for any type of abuse and report it immediately to her, the DON, ADON or the staff's supervisor . In an interview on 09/20/2023 at 8:40 AM Med Aide E stated she had been in-serviced on abuse and neglect. She stated she did not recall the last time she was in-serviced. She also stated if a CNA picked up a resident's leg and was aware the resident had pain and swelling in the knee and pain in that leg and was not providing care, she stated if the resident were screaming when the CNA did that, she would consider that physical abuse. She stated if a CNA stated you are crazy as she was exiting a resident's room that would be verbal abuse. She stated the Administrator was abuse coordinator. In an interview on 09/22/2023 at 10:30 AM, the ADON stated if a CNA picked up Resident #1's leg and if they knew Resident #1 was in severe pain and her knee was swollen, that would be considered physical abuse. She also stated if a CNA was exiting Resident #1's room and allegedly made the statement you are crazy , that was verbal abuse. The ADON stated an abuse and neglect in-service was given recently, however, she did not recall the date. She stated the Administrator was the abuse coordinator. In an interview on 09/22/2023 at 1:36 PM, attempted to contact LVN A and was unable to leave message. LVN A was in the facility on the night of 09/18/2023 and needed to interview LVN A to determine if she heard what CNA H stated to Resident #1 or if she knew about CNA H picking up Resident #1's leg. In an interview on 09/22/2023 at 1:40 PM, attempted to contact CNA H and left voice message of name, agency, and phone number. In an interview on 09/22/2023 at 1:47 PM, attempted to contact CNA I and left voice message of name, agency, and phone number. CNA I was in the facility on 09/18/2023 and may have witnessed what CNA H stated from the hallway. Record review of the facility's policy for Prohibition of Abuse, Neglect and Misappropriation of Property dated 05/01/01 reflected each resident had the right to be free from abuse, mistreatment, neglect, corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, and financial abuse. Abuse means: the willful infliction of injury, withholding or misappropriating property or money, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish. Verbal abuse is defined as the use of , oral, written or gestured language that willfully includes disparaging or derogatory terms to residents or their families, or within their hearing distance regardless of their age, ability to comprehend, or disability.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Abuse Prevention Policies (Tag F0607)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to implement their written policies and procedures that p...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to implement their written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent the abuse/neglect of residents for one Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. The facility failed to implement their abuse/neglect policy when LVN A was notified of Resident #1's pain and the administrator was notified of the incident by the COTAand the administrator failed to investigate the injury per policy. This failure could place residents at risk of abuse, neglect, physical harm, pain, mental anguish, emotional distress, and serious harm. Findings include: Record review of Facility Policy on Prohibition of Abuse, Neglect and Misappropriation of Property dated 05/01/01 reflected each resident had the right to be free from abuse, mistreatment, neglect, corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, and financial abuse. The facility will investigate of alleged or suspected abuse, neglect, or misappropriation of property, and will provide notification of information to the proper authorities according to state and federal regulations. 1. Abuse means: the willful infliction of injury, withholding or misappropriating property or money, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish. 2. Verbal abuse is defined as the use of , oral, written, or gestured language that willfully includes disparaging or derogatory terms to residents or their families, or within their hearing distance regardless of their age, ability to comprehend, or disability. Staff responsibility to immediately report any violations or alleged violations. 3. Neglect: was defined as the failure to provide goods and services necessary to avoid physical harm, mental anguish, or mental illness. The facility will track all occurrences, trends or patterns that could potentially constitute abuse or neglect. All incidences of unknown origin will be investigated. Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 09/22/2023, revealed Resident #1 was an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses which included low back pain ( pain between the lower edge of the ribs), signs symptoms of musculoskeletal system ( mild to severe aches, low back pain, numbness, tingling, atrophy, and weakness), muscle weakness ( a lack of strength in the muscles), osteoporosis without current pathological fracture (generally caused by a fall from a standing height or lower and usually involves the spine, hip or wrist), lack of coordination (uncoordinated movement due to a muscle control problem that causes an inability to coordinate movements) left foot drop ( caused by weakness of the muscles involved in lifting the front part of the foot) and, abnormalities of gait and mobility (when a person is unable to walk in the usually way). Record review of Resident #1's Annual MDS assessment, dated 07/28/2023, reflected Resident #1 had a BIMS score of fifteen, which indicated the residents' cognition was intact. Resident did not reject care. Resident #1 was assessed to require extensive assistance by two staff members for transfers. She required extensive assistance by one staff for bed mobility and toileting. Resident #1 was also assessed to require limited assistance by one staff for personal hygiene. She was assessed require staff to stabilize her when moving from seated to standing position, moving on and off toilet, and surface-to-surface transfer. Resident #1 was on scheduled pain medication and PRN pain medication. She had frequent pain. Resident #1 did not exhibit any behaviors. Record review of Resident #1's Comprehensive Care Plan completed on 08/17/2023 reflected Resident #1 had an ADL self-care performance deficit. Interventions: resident required extensive assistance by two staff members. Resident #1 required extensive assistance by one staff members with bed mobility. Resident #1 was at risk for falls related to gait/balance problems. She had limited physical mobility. Resident had chronic pain related to osteoporosis (a condition when bone strength weakens) Interventions: anticipate the resident's need for pain relief and respond immediately to any complaint of pain. Identify and record previous pain history and management of that pain and impact of function. Identify previous response to analgesia including pain relief, side effects and impact on function. Monitor/ document for probable cause of each pian episode. Remove/limit causes where possible. Resident #1's further interventions were: Monitor/document for side effects of pain medication. Administer analgesia as per orders. Give ½ hour before treatments or care. Notify the physician if interventions are unsuccessful or if current complaint is a significant change from resident's experience of pain. Provide the resident and family with information about pain and options available for pain management. Discuss and record preferences. Record review of the Daily Nurses Schedule for 09/18/2023 for the 6:00 PM - 6:00 AM shift reflected LVN A was the only nurse in the facility. The staff did not have another nurse in the facility to report of Resident #1's pain. Record review of Resident #1's nurses notes dated 09/18/2023 at 6:50 PM, reflected pain medication was given by mouth every four hours for pain. Resident #1 complained of left knee pain and requested pain medication. Record review of Resident #1's nurses notes dated 09/18/2023 at 8:10 PM, reflected the MD was notified of resident's complaint of pain to the left knee and left knee was slightly swollen. Awaiting return call. Record review of Resident #1's nurses notes dates 09/18/2023 at 9:14 PM, reflected the MD returned call and ordered an x-ray to the left knee. Record review of Resident #1's nurses notes dated 09/18/2023 at 11:41 PM, reflected pain medication was given by mouth every four hours as needed for pain. Resident #1 reported pain to her knee. (Did not specify which knee). Record review of Resident #1's nurses note dated 09/19/2023 at 1:05 AM, reflected the pain medication was effective and follow-up pain scale was zero Record review of Resident #1's nurses note dated 09/19/2023 at 4:15 AM, reflected pain medication was given to the resident. Resident #1 was complaining of pain to her left knee and requested pain medication. Record review of Resident #1's nurses note dated 09/19/2023 at 8:09 AM, reflected report was received from LVN A concerning Resident #1 had an order for a left knee x-ray. LVN B notified the x-ray company and was informed the x-ray company would be at the facility as soon as possible. Resident aware. Signed by LVN B Record review of Resident #1's nurses note dated 09/19/2023 at 10:05 AM, reflected Was the resident in pain? 0-no pain, 1-3 - mild pain , 4-6- moderate pain , 7-10- severe pain. Every shift follows MD orders. Resident #1 complained of pain to left knee. Record review of Resident #1's nurses notes dated 09/19/2023 at 10:06 AM, reflected pain medication was administered. Give one tablet by mouth every four hours as needed for pain. Record review of Resident #1's nurses notes dated 09/19/2023 at 10:26 AM, reflected the x-Ray company was unable to do the x-ray at the facility for Resident #1's left knee. Resident #1 would be transferred via EMS to the hospital for an x-ray to her left knee. Resident #1 aware and the family was notified. Record review of Resident #1's nurses notes dated 09/19/2023 at 10:44 AM, reflected EMS was at the facility to transport the resident to hospital. Record review of Resident #1's nurses notes dated 09/19/2023 at 10:47 AM, reflected the pain medication was ineffective and follow-up pain was a five (moderately strong pain). Resident #1 was transferred to emergency room for evaluation and treatment. Record review of Resident #1's pain assessments reflected there was only one pain assessment completed from 07/21/2023 through 09/19/2023. Record review of Resident #1's pain assessment dated [DATE] reflected Resident #1 had been in pain for the past five days. She frequently had pain. Resident #1 was assessed she had difficulty completing her day-to-day activities as related to her pain. Her pain was moderate. Resident #1 was on scheduled pain medication. Signed by the MDS Coordinator. Record review of Resident #1's hospital records from the emergency room hospital A dated 09/19/2023 reflected Resident #1 was transferred by EMS with a complaint of knee pain. She was being transferred between the bed and wheelchair yesterday (09/18/2023) in the facility where she resided when her knee twisted and then became painful and swollen. EMS reported she was given 7.5 milligram of pain medication this AM (09/19/2023) for pain. The EMS did not know the time the pain medication was administered. admission: Urgent, admission Source: Nursing Home. Nursing Assessment: extremity lower. There was obvious swelling to the knee and there appeared to be slight angulation (two ends of the broken bone are at an angle to each other) of the leg. No bruising or open wounds noted to the knee. Record review of Resident #1's doctors notes from the emergency room Hospital A dated 09/19/2023 reflected Resident #1was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] from the nursing home where she resided. On 09/18/2023 Resident #1 was being rotated out of her wheelchair when the staff heard a popping noise from her left knee, and she had called out in pain. The staff noticed on 09/19/2023 the knee continued to be swollen and very painful for the patient when she was moving her knee. Resident #1 was transferred to emergency room for evaluation for possible knee dislocation or knee fracture or any injury. Resident #1was able to express that she felt a significant amount of pain when her left knee was mobilized. The x-ray result reflected Resident #1 had traumatic fracture of the distal femur (where the bone flares out like an upside-down funnel). Record review of Resident #1's emergency room clinical course and plan reflected, Resident #1 had a distal femur fracture. The fracture was acutely comminuted fracture (a type of fracture where broken bones fracture into more than three separate pieces). Resident #1's pain was under control if the leg was immobile. Two rigid boards were placed on the side of the knee and an ace bandage was used to wrap around the knee for compression and stability. Resident #1 would be transferred to a hospital with orthopedics. Resident #1 required a higher level of care. Record review of Resident #1's emergency room history and physical from a hospital B dated 09/20/2023 reflected chief complaint of Resident #1: Left knee pain after hearing a pop, being lifted from wheelchair to bed. Resident #1 was transferred from the nursing home following left knee pain during the time when the staff were trying to transition her from her wheelchair to her bed. There was a popping noise and Resident #1 had immediate pain. Resident #1 was seen today (09/20/2023) in the hospital bed with her left leg splinted. Imaging studies reflected: X-ray of the left knee, two views reflected impression, acute mildly comminuted fracture of the distal femur medtadiaphysis (a type of fracture where broken bones fracture more than three separated places - medtadiaphysis is a term used to describe the combined region of a long bone and the shaft of the bone. Lesions that span both regions). Plan: to admit to surgical unit. Observation on 09/20/2023 of Resident #1's electronic monitoring video supplied by family revealed on 09/18/2023 at 05:52 PM COTA/ Marketing Coordinator and PTA began to transfer Resident #1 from her wheelchair to her bed. Resident #1 was not yelling or complaining about pain. Resident #1 was transferred to her bed and as soon as she sat on the bed, she began to yell my knee is hurting my knee is broken. Observation on 09/20/2023 of Resident #1's electronic monitoring video supplied by family revealed on 09/18/2023 at 05:53 PM Resident #1 was yelling my knee is hurting and my leg broken. Resident #1 began to rub her left leg as she continued to yell. Observation on 09/20/2023 of Resident #1's electronic monitoring video supplied by family revealed on 09/18/2023 Resident #1 continued to yell when staff would touch her left leg or move her left leg. Resident would scream she was hurting. Observation on 09/20/2023 of Resident #1's electronic monitoring video supplied by family revealed on 09/18/2023 at 6:00 PM, Resident #1 stated you ( PTA) turned me around and Resident #1 was looking at PTA as she made this statement. The PTA stated, we did not mean to hurt you. Observation on 09/20/2023 of Resident #1's electronic monitoring video supplied by family revealed on 09/18/2023 at 7:58 PM, CNA H was in Resident #1 room she lifted Resident #1 left leg up and Resident # 1 began to scream, and CNA let the left leg fall onto the bed and began to exit Resident #1 room. CNA H was not providing care to Resident #1. Resident #1 was screaming the entire time she lifted her leg and when she lowered the left leg on the bed. Resident #1 was not yelling prior to CNA H picking up her leg. She stated as she was walking out Resident #1's room , you have that camera in your room, and you are acting all crazy. In an interview on 09/20/2023 at 8:11 PM Resident #1's family member stated he witnessed from the camera in Resident #1's room on 09/18/23 at 5:51 PM staff breaking Resident #1's leg, Resident #1 complaining of pain and staff saying back to Resident #1 you know you're not hurt. You've complained about your back hurting before too and it was nothing. He stated staff did not call the family to notify them of the incident until 9/19/2023 at 10:44 AM and an ambulance was called to take Resident #1 to the hospital on 9/19/2023 at 10:44 AM. He stated there was also video of a CNA checking Resident #1's leg, picking the broken leg up and dropping it back on the bed and telling Resident #1 she was not hurt. Resident #1's family member also stated in the video after CNA dropped Resident #1 leg and began toward the door the CNA stated to Resident #1 you are crazy. He also stated the facility did not do anything for Resident #1 except give her pain medication she was already receiving. He stated he did not believe this medication helped Resident #1 due to Resident #1 continued to be in pain. He also stated Resident #1 was neglected and she needed to be in the hospital for x-rays immediately when Resident #1 began to yell she was in pain and her leg was broken. He stated she would rub on her left leg and by her expression from the video footage he noticed she was in pain. He stated he did not view the videos until 09/19/2023 after family received a phone call Resident #1 was going to be transferred to the hospital. He stated if he had seen the videos from Resident #1's room on 09/18/2023 he would have drove two hours to ensure she was getting the treatment she needed and was sent to the hospital immediately. He stated that was a new pain for Resident #1 and she had not been complaining about her knee. He also stated it was a new symptom for her knee to swell. In an interview on 09/20/2023 at 2:41 PM the COTA/ Marketing Coordinator stated she reported to LVN A on 09/18/2023 from 6:00 PM, until approximately 09/18/2023 at 8:25 PM of Resident #1 complaining of pain in knee and left leg. She stated she also reported to LVN A that Resident #1 was making statements her knee was broken. She stated she explained to LVN A Resident #1 was in severe pain. She stated LVN A made the remark that that is normal for Resident #1, she was always complaining about being in pain and that was nothing new. The COTA/ Marketing Coordinator stated LVN A was informed of the information at approximately 6:10 PM and LVN A did not go to Resident #1's room until approximately 8:30 PM. She stated either she or the PTA was always in Resident #1's room from around 6:00 PM until 8:45 PM. She stated LVN A would not go to Resident #1's room to administer pain medication and the resident was in pain for at almost 2 hours. She stated she asked LVN A to give her the pain medication and she would administer it to Resident #1. She stated LVN A gave her the pain medication (narco) and she gave it to Resident #1. She stated she could not sit by and watch Resident #1 be in pain for an hour or more and the nurse refused to go to Resident #1's room due to believing Resident #1 was complaining for no reason. She stated it was difficult to even talk to LVN A due to her expressing no compassion towards Resident #1 and not wanting to assess her to determine if anything was wrong with Resident #1. She also stated she called the Administrator on 09/18/2023 ( did not recall the time). She stated she informed the Administrator of Resident #1's pain and swelling in the left knee. She stated the Administrator advised her to speak with the nurse and explain to the nurse to call the MD and have x-rays ordered. She stated she spoke with LVN A and explained the Administrator stated to call the MD and have x-rays ordered. She stated LVN A was organizing to pass out medications and began to pass medications and there was not an emergency occurring where she could not stop what she was doing to go to Resident #1's room. She stated she did not feel comfortable leaving Resident #1 on 09/18/2023 due to LVN A not going to Resident #1's room to complete an assessment or make any type of observation of why Resident #1 was in extreme pain. She stated Resident #1's left knee continued to become larger, and she was going to report Resident #1's condition approximately every 10 minutes and the nurse stated to the COTA/Marketing Coordinator that Resident #1 was ok, that is the way Resident #1 always was and there was not anything wrong with Resident #1. She stated around 8:30 PM LVN A entered Resident #1's room and stated Resident #1's left knee does not look any different than it has in the past. The COTA/Marketing Coordinator stated that LVN A informed her and PTA C to go home, she had this and promised to take care of Resident # 1. She stated LVN A did not assess Resident #1. The COTA/Marketing Coordinator stated when she came on duty on 09/19/2023 the ambulance was in front of the facility transferring Resident #1 to the hospital. She stated she was shocked and could not believe LVN A allowed Resident #1 to remain in the facility that night without getting an x-ray or doing anything to ensure Resident #1 did not have any broken bones. The COTA/Marketing Coordinator stated she did believe LVN A was neglecting Resident #1. She stated LVN A refused to go to Resident #1's room and complete an assessment approximately 2 hours after being informed of Resident #1's left knee/ leg pain and Resident #1 stating she thought her leg was broken. She stated she was upset, and the nurse ignored her whenever she reported anything about Resident #1. She stated LVN A neglected Resident #1 on 09/18/2023. In an interview on 09/20/2023 at 3:41 PM LVN D stated Resident #1 yelled out frequently. She stated when she was yelling, she was in pain. LVN D stated resident complains about her back hurting. She stated everyone knew Resident #1 yelled frequently when she was in pain. She stated there were times when she was speaking to Resident #1, and she was complaining/ yelling with pain, and she would administer her ordered pain medication without asking Resident #1 where she was hurting or her pain level. She stated she has not ever completed a pain assessment on Resident #1 but now she realized she was required to complete pain assessment and document in nurses notes about Resident #1's pain. She also stated the nurses was expected to ask where the pain was located and the pain level on a scale of zero-ten. She stated zero - no pain and ten- extreme pain. She stated due to Resident #1 complaining about pain all the time the nurses would give her the pain medication if it was scheduled and not ask her any questions. She stated if she had been working on the night of 09/18/2023 and Resident #1 was complaining about pain in her knee she would have given her pain medication and probably would not have asked any questions or completed any type of incident reports or pain assessments due to this was how Resident #1 she was always complained about pain. She stated this was her normal behavior. LVN D stated resident did not have any behavior problems. She stated she would yell but only when she was in pain. She stated Resident #1 was cooperative with staff and did not have any behavior issues. LVN D stated she has given care to Resident #1 numerous times. She stated it varied from week to week, but she was very familiar with Resident #1 physical condition, moods, and behaviors. She also stated when Resident #1 was in pain she did not assess the resident to determine if it was a new pain or pain from her back. She stated everyone in the facility was aware if Resident #1 was in pain she will yell, and we don't assess the pain very closely when giving pain medication. She stated we give her anti -anxiety medication to prevent her from yelling. She also stated she did not believe any assessment was required when she was yelling about pain in her knee. She stated she was not working on 09/18/2023 but she would not have completed a pain assessment on resident. She also stated if a nurse was informed by staff over an hour that Resident #1's knee had increased in size due to swelling, Resident #1 was yelling in pain and Resident #1 stated she thought she broke her leg/knee, a nurse was expected to go to that room immediately due to that was a new pain for Resident #1; and anytime a resident stated they thought their leg/knee was broken that was serious. She stated if a nurse did not visit Resident #1 immediately after allegedly being informed every 10 minutes of her change in physical condition, that would be considered neglect. She stated unless there was an emergency with another resident. She stated a nurse could not ignore when staff was concerned about a resident's physical condition, and they felt there was a major concern for resident's physical health. She stated if a nurse continued to refuse to go to Resident #1's room for almost 2 hours, they did neglect Resident #1. She stated if the staff did not know why Resident # 1's knee was swelling, very painful to touch and Resident #1 allegedly stating her leg was broken, that would be considered an injury of unknown origin and would need to be investigated. In an interview on 09/21/2023 at 11:00 AM, attempted to contact LVN A and was unable to leave message. LVN A was in the facility when Resident was in pain and complaining of her left knee hurting In an interview on 09/21/2023 at 12:00 PM, PTA C stated the COTA/ Marketing Coordinator asked her to help her to transfer Resident #1 from her recliner to the wheelchair and then to the bed. She stated this occurred approximately 6:00 PM. She stated Resident #1 was transferred from the recliner to the wheelchair and Resident #1 complained about her back hurting after the transfer. She stated Resident #1 was assisted by the bed in her wheelchair to prepare for the transfer from the wheelchair to the bed. She stated once Resident #1 was in her wheelchair by the bed she was calm and quit complaining about her back hurting. PTA C stated the COTA/ Marketing Coordinator was in front of resident and placed the gait belt around the resident waist. She stated they began to transfer Resident #1 to the bed and as soon as they pivoted Resident #1 onto the bed, she began to yell my knee hurts. PTA C stated she assumed it was similar of her complaining about her pain in her back. She stated Resident #1 at some point stated her left leg was broken. PTA C also stated she realized this was a different type of pain than what she has complained in the past. She stated COTA/ Marketing Coordinator left the room to report to LVN A. She stated they kept waiting on pain medication or the nurse to come assess Resident #1 due to her knee continued to swell and was becoming larger. She stated Resident #1 would yell in pain when her leg was barely touched or moved. Resident #1 would rub her knee and below the knee onto her left leg and stated it was broken. PTA C stated LVN A would not come to Resident #1 room to give her pain medication or assess her. She stated the nurse gave COTA/ Marketing Coordinator the pain medication and the COTA/ Marketing Coordinator gave Resident #1 pain medication. PTA C stated she did not recall the time, but she thought it was around 7:00 PM. She stated LVN A entered Resident #1's room approximately 8:30 PM. She stated she was in the room while LVN A talked to Resident #1. PTA C stated LVN A looked at Resident #1's knee approximately 5 seconds and stated her knee is fine. PTA C stated LVN A did not assess Resident #1 or ask her if she hurting in other areas. She stated LVN A did not ask Resident #1 what her pain level was or if the pain medication was effective. She also stated LVN A did not realize PTA C was in the room. PTA C stated when LVN A saw her in the room she stated oh are you a family member I didn't know anyone was in the room. PTA C stated no I am not a family member I am a Physical Therapist Assistant at this facility, and I helped assist Resident #1 to be when she began complaining about her knee. PTA C stated LVN A did not ask her any questions about the transfer or anything about Resident #1. PTA C stated she informed LVN A that she and COTA/ Marketing Coordinator had been in the room with Resident #1 since around 6:00 PM after she began complaining about pain in left knee and stating her left leg was broken. She stated LVN A walked out of the room and stated she is fine she always complains about pain. She also stated LVN A was preparing to pass out medications and began to pass out meds to residents and there was not an emergency. LVN A could have stopped what she was doing and came to Resident #1's room to complete an assessment. She stated if an assessment had been completed and LVN A would have went to Resident #1's room at approximately 6:10 PM she believed Resident #1 would have been sent to the hospital for evaluation that night. She stated she did believe LVN A was neglecting Resident #1. She stated the statements from LVN A was that Resident #1 was always like that and she was always complaining about something, and there was not anything wrong with her. She stated that was deliberate neglect from LVN A . In an interview on 09/21/2023 at 2:45 PM the Administrator stated the COTA/ Marketing Coordinator contacted her on 09/18/2023 in the evening. She stated she did not recall the exact time. She stated she was informed of Resident #1 had pain and some swelling in her left knee. She stated she asked COTA/Marketing Coordinator to inform the nurse to contact the physician and have an x-ray ordered. The Administrator stated anytime a Resident complains of pain whether it is an old or new pain she expected a pain assessment to be completed. She stated LVN A was expected to assess Resident #1 and ask the staff questions and contact the DON with the information. She stated LVN A did not follow protocol of assessing Resident #1,completing a pain assessment, and asked questions reason Resident #1 knee began to swell and why Resident # 1 believed her leg was broken. The Administrator stated Resident #1 needed an x-ray on 09/18/2023 and if the x-ray company could not come to the facility, the nurse was expected to call MD and request for Resident #1 to be sent to the emergency room that night. She stated if Resident #1 was in pain and complaining of her left knee being broken on 09/18/2023, 911 needed to be called and EMS transfer her to the Emergency Room. She stated anytime a Resident complains of pain the nurse was expected to ask the resident where the pain was located , the level of the pain, and to document all this information in the nurses notes and complete a pain assessment. She stated if Resident #1 had a new pain after a transfer, the nurse was expected to ask the staff questions about the transfer, immediately do an assessment, and begin an incident report if needed. She stated the nurse was expected to contact the DON with the information and after she contacted the physician and call 911 to transfer Resident #1 to emergency room. The Administrator stated it was not best practice to have a resident in the facility from the night of 09/18/2023 until the morning of 09/19/2023 in pain with a possible left leg or knee fracture. She stated based on the information she learned today (09/21/2023) of Resident #1's new physical concerns she endured on 09/18/2023 Resident #1 required to be assessed by a physician in the emergency room and have x-rays on her left leg and left knee as soon as possible on 09/18/2023. She stated the facility had protocols in place to ensure the residents was receiving the best care for their physical condition whether it was a new physical issue or an old physical issue. She stated the nursing staff on 09/18/2023 did not follow the facility's protocol and there was a system failure. She stated it was the DON's responsibility to monitor the nurses to ensure they were following protocol. She stated it was discussed in the morning meeting on 09/19/2023 about Resident #1's knee and leg. She stated it was discussed Resident #1 needed an X-Ray. She stated the staff was not interviewed and there was not any questioning of what happened to Resident #1's left knee or left leg. The Administrator stated after today ( 09/21/2023) she realized either she or the DON needed to complete an investigation of what happened with Resident #1. She stated if a nurse continued to refuse to assess a resident after being asked several times by the staff, she would consider that neglect. She also stated if a staff knew Resident #1 was in extreme pain in her left leg and they lifted the left leg in the air and did not gently place the left leg on the bed she would consider that abuse. She also stated if staff made a statement to Resident #1 as she was leaving the room that Resident #1 was crazy, she stated that was verbal abuse. She stated in the abuse and neglect policy and protocol it was clear what to do if anything was suspected and she stated they did not follow protocol to investigate what occurred with Resident #1 on 09/18/2023. The Administrator also stated if Resident #1 complained that her leg was broken, her knee continued to swell and she was in extreme pain within a few seconds after she was transferred from a wheelchair to the bed, there was a potential of an injury of unknown origin. She stated no one reported that to her. The Administrator did not see the electronic video given from family; however, she heard the video and the Administrator stated Resident #1 stated her leg was broken. In an interview on 09/22/2023 at 9:05 AM, LVN B stated Resident #1 did complain about pain frequently. LVN B stated if it was reported to the nurse of Resident #1 having pain and swelling in her left knee and Resident #1 believed her left knee or left leg was broken, LVN A did not follow proper protocol to ensure Resident #1 was receiving the medical care she needed the night of 09/18/2023. She stated Resident #1 needed to be transferred to the hospital on [DATE]. LVN B stated if staff continued to report to LVN A over an hour that Resident #1 was in pain, the swelling in left knee had increased in size and Resident #1 stated her leg/knee was broken, LVN A was expected to go to Resident #1's room immediately. She stated if LVN A continued to refuse to assess Resident #1 that would be considered neglect, unless there was an emergency with another resident. She stated if it was verified there was not an emergency every time staff was reporting the new physical condition Resident #1 was in , LVN A did neglect Resident #1. She also stated on Tuesday 09/19/2023 at approximately 9:00 AM in the staff meeting she reported Resident #1's knee was swollen, and she had been in pain. She stated she also informed the administrative staff in the morning meeting that the x-ray department may not be available to come to the facility until the afternoon. She stated the Administrator stated to call the physician and send Resident #1 to hospital[TRUNCATED]
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0697 (Tag F0697)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, observation, and record review the facility failed to ensure that pain management was provided to residents ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, observation, and record review the facility failed to ensure that pain management was provided to residents who require such services, consistent with professional standards of practice for one (Resident #1) of four residents reviewed for pain in that: The facility failed to properly assess or provide effective pain management to Resident #1 after a new onset of pain following the accidental fracture of her left tibia during a transfer from wheelchair to her bed. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the highest practicable care through resident assessments by recognizing and addressing the physical dysfunctions in an effective and timely manner to prevent residents from further harm, injury, or death Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 09/22/2023, revealed Resident #1 was an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses which included low back pain (pain between the lower edge of the ribs), signs symptoms of musculoskeletal system ( mild to severe aches, low back pain, numbness, tingling, atrophy, and weakness), muscle weakness ( a lack of strength in the muscles), osteoporosis without current pathological fracture (generally caused by a fall from a standing height or lower and usually involves the spine, hip or wrist), lack of coordination (uncoordinated movement due to a muscle control problem that causes an inability to coordinate movements), left foot drop ( caused by weakness of the muscles involved in lifting the front part of the foot) and, abnormalities of gait and mobility (when a person is unable to walk in the usually way). Record review of Resident #1's Annual MDS assessment, dated 07/28/2023, reflected Resident #1 had a BIMS score of fifteen, which indicated the resident's cognition was intact. Resident #1 did not reject care. Resident #1 was assessed to require extensive assistance by two staff members for transfers. She required extensive assistance by one staff for bed mobility and toileting. Resident #1 was also assessed to require limited assistance by one staff for personal hygiene. She was assessed to require staff to stabilize her when moving from a seated to standing position, moving on and off the toilet, and surface-to-surface transfers. Resident #1 was on scheduled pain medication and PRN pain medication. She had frequent pain. Resident #1 did not exhibit any behaviors. Record review of Resident #1's Comprehensive Care Plan completed on 08/17/2023 reflected Resident #1 had an ADL self-care performance deficit. Interventions included that the resident required extensive assistance by two staff members. Resident #1 required extensive assistance by one staff member with bed mobility. Resident #1 was at risk for falls related to gait/balance problems. She had limited physical mobility. Resident had chronic pain related to osteoporosis (a condition when bone strength weakens) Interventions included to anticipate the resident's need for pain relief and respond immediately to any complaint of pain; identify and record previous pain history and management of that pain and impact of function; identify previous response to analgesia (treatment that prevents you from feeling pain while you are awake) including pain relief, side effects and impact on function; monitor/document for probable cause of each pian episode; and remove/limit causes where possible. Resident #1's further interventions were: monitor/document for side effects of pain medication; administer analgesia as per orders; give ½ hour before treatments or care; notify the physician if interventions are unsuccessful or if current complaint is a significant change from resident's experience of pain; provide the resident and family with information about pain and options available for pain management; and discuss and residents' preferences . Record review of Resident #1's Physician Orders last reviewed on 07/31/2023 reflected Resident #1 had a physician order for Norco Oral Tablet 7.5-325 milligram give tablet by mouth every four hours as needed for pain. Record review of Resident #1's Physician Orders last reviewed on 07/31/2023 reflected Resident #1 had a physician order for Acetaminophen Extra Strength oral Tablet 500 mg by mouth every six hours as needed for pain. Record review of Resident #1's nurses notes dated 09/18/2023 at 6:50 PM, reflected pain medication was given by mouth every four hours for pain. Resident #1 complained of left knee pain and requested pain medication. Record review of Resident #1's nurses notes dated 09/18/2023 at 8:10 PM, reflected the MD was notified of resident's complaint of pain to the left knee and left knee was slightly swollen. Awaiting return call. Record review of Resident #1's nurses notes dates 09/18/2023 at 9:14 PM, reflected the MD returned call and ordered an x-ray to the left knee. Record review of Resident #1's nurses notes dated 09/18/2023 at 11:41 PM, reflected pain medication was given by mouth every four hours as needed for pain. Resident #1 reported pain to her knee. (Did not specify which knee). Record review of Resident #1's nurses note dated 09/19/2023 at 1:05 AM, reflected the pain medication was effective and follow-up pain scale was zero Record review of Resident #1's nurses note dated 09/19/2023 at 4:15 AM, reflected pain medication was given to the resident. Resident #1 was complaining of pain to her left knee and requested pain medication. Record review of Resident #1's nurses note dated 09/19/2023 at 8:09 AM, reflected report was received from LVN A concerning Resident #1 had an order for a left knee x-ray. LVN B notified the x-ray company and was informed the x-ray company would be at the facility as soon as possible. Resident aware. Signed by LVN B Record review of Resident #1's nurses note dated 09/19/2023 at 10:05 AM, reflected Was the resident in pain? 0-no pain, 1-3 - mild pain , 4-6- moderate pain , 7-10- severe pain. Every shift follows MD orders. Resident #1 complained of pain to left knee. Record review of Resident #1's nurses notes dated 09/19/2023 at 10:06 AM, reflected pain medication was administered. Give one tablet by mouth every four hours as needed for pain. Record review of Resident #1's nurses notes dated 09/ 19/2023 at 10:26 AM, reflected the x-Ray company was unable to do the x-ray at the facility for Resident #1's left knee. Resident #1 would be transferred via EMS to the hospital for an x-ray to her left knee. Resident #1 aware and the family was notified. Record review of Resident #1's nurses notes dated 09/19/2023 at 10:44 AM, reflected EMS was at the facility to transport the resident to hospital. Record review of Resident #1's nurses notes dated 09/19/2023 at 10:47 AM , reflected the pain medication was ineffective and follow-up pain was a five (moderately strong pain). Resident #1 was transferred to emergency room for evaluation and treatment. Record review of Resident #1's pain assessments reflected there was only one pain assessment completed from 07/21/2023 through 09/19/2023. Record review of Resident #1's pain assessment dated [DATE] reflected Resident #1 had been in pain for the past five days. She frequently had pain. Resident #1 was assessed she had difficulty completing her day-to-day activities as related to her pain. Her pain was moderate. Resident #1 was on scheduled pain medication. Signed by the MDS Coordinator. Record review of Resident #1's hospital records from the emergency room Hospital A dated 09/19/2023 reflected Resident #1 was transferred by EMS with a complaint of knee pain. She was being transferred between the bed and wheelchair yesterday (09/18/2023) in the facility where she resided when her knee twisted and then became painful and swollen. EMS reported she was given 7.5 milligram of pain medication this AM (09/19/2023) for pain. The EMS did not know the time the pain medication was administered. admission: Urgent, admission Source: Nursing Home. Nursing Assessment: extremity lower. There was obvious swelling to the knee and there appeared to be slight angulation (two ends of the broken bone are at an angle to each other) of the leg. No bruising or open wounds noted to the knee. Record review of Resident #1's doctors notes from the emergency room Hospital A dated 09/19/2023 reflected Resident #1was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] from the nursing home where she resided. On 09/18/2023 Resident #1 was being rotated out of her wheelchair when the staff heard a popping noise from her left knee, and she had called out in pain. The staff noticed on 09/19/2023 the knee continued to be swollen and very painful for the patient when she was moving her knee. Resident #1 was transferred to emergency room for evaluation for possible knee dislocation or knee fracture or any injury. Resident #1was able to express that she felt a significant amount of pain when her left knee was mobilized. The x-ray result reflected Resident #1 had traumatic fracture of the distal femur ( where the bone flares out like an upside-down funnel) Record review of Resident #1's emergency room clinical course and plan reflected, Resident #1 had a distal femur fracture. The fracture was acutely comminuted fracture (a type of fracture where broken bones fracture into more than three separate pieces). Resident #1's pain was under control if the leg was immobile. Two rigid boards were placed on the side of the knee and an ace bandage was used to wrap around the knee for compression and stability. Resident #1 would be transferred to a hospital with orthopedics. Resident #1 required a higher level of care. Record review of Resident #1's emergency room history and physical from a hospital B dated 09/20/2023 reflected chief complaint of Resident #1: Left knee pain after hearing a pop, being lifted from wheelchair to bed. Resident #1 was transferred from the nursing home following left knee pain during the time when the staff were trying to transition her from her wheelchair to her bed. There was a popping noise and Resident #1 had immediate pain. Resident #1 was seen today (09/20/2023) in the hospital bed with her left leg splinted. Imaging studies reflected: X-ray of the left knee, two views reflected impression, acute mildly comminuted fracture of the distal femur medtadiaphysis (a type of fracture where broken bones fracture more than three separated places - medtadiaphysis is a term used to describe the combined region of a long bone and the shaft of the bone. Lesions that span both regions). Plan: to admit to surgical unit. Record review of the Daily Nurses Schedule for 09/18/2023 for the 6:00 PM - 6:00 AM shift reflected LVN A was the only nurse in the facility. There was not another nurse the staff could report Resident #1 was in pain. LVN A was the only nurse on duty. Observation on 09/20/2023 of Resident #1's electronic monitoring video supplied by the family revealed on 09/18/2023 revealed the following: - At 05:44 PM, the COTA/Marketing Coordinator stated to Resident #1 she had not transferred Resident #1 before, and asked Resident #1 if she was able to help during transfers or did, she need a gait belt. The COTA/Marketing Coordinator stated she was going to find a gait belt. -At 05:49 PM, the COTA/ Marketing Coordinator and PTA began transferring Resident #1 from the recliner to the wheelchair ( on 09/18/2023 PM) Resident #1 complained about her back hurting but was not yelling. - At 05:52 PM, the COTA/Marketing Coordinator and PTA began to transfer Resident #1 ( by 2 person assist with gait belt) from her wheelchair to her bed in PM. Resident #1 was not yelling or complaining about pain. Resident #1 was transferred to her bed and as soon as she sat on the bed, she began to yell that her knee was hurting, and her knee was broken. - At 05:53 PM, Resident #1 began to rub her left leg as she continued to yell. Resident #1 continued to yell when staff would touch her left leg or move her left leg. Resident #1 would scream she was hurting. - At 6:00 PM. Resident #1 stated to PTA that they turned her around and Resident #1 was looking at PTA as she made the statement. The PTA stated to Resident #1 they did not mean to hurt her. In an interview on 09/20/2023 at 12:58 PM the Director of Nurses stated anytime a resident was requesting a pain medication or makes a statement they are in pain; prior to giving the pain medication the nurse was expected to ask the resident where the pain was located and to ask the resident on a scale of 0-10 with zero meaning no pain and ten being the highest pain level what was the resident's pain level was. She stated the nurse was expected to document that information in the nurses notes of where the pain was located and the pain scale. The Director of Nurses stated a pain assessment was required to be completed when a resident reported they were in pain. She also stated the nurse administering the pain medication was the nurse expected to complete the pain assessment. She stated there was only one pain assessment in Resident #1's electronic medical record. The Director of Nurses stated pain assessment was required whenever a resident complained about being in pain. She stated Resident #1 did yell al lot when she was in pain and was in pain al lot. She stated if Resident #1 complained about her left knee and leg hurting that was a new pain for Resident #1. She stated if Resident #1's left knee was swollen the nurse was expected to do a complete pain assessment and possibly incident report to determine if anything happened during the resident's transfer from the wheelchair to the bed. The Director of Nurses stated it was reported to her by the PT/ Marketing Coordinator on 09/19/2023 Resident #1 was yelling her left knee and left leg were hurting after she was transferred from the wheelchair to the bed. She stated the nurse was expected to gather information from the COTA/Marketing Coordinator and PTA who transferred Resident #1 and possibly needed an incident report completed and the nurse was required to completed a pain assessment or do some type of assessment of the resident. The Director of Nurses stated Resident #1 only yelled out when she was in pain. She stated she was not aware of any behavior problems Resident #1 had with staff or with anyone. She stated Resident #1 should have been transferred to the emergency room on [DATE] after the nurse received orders for the x-ray. She stated the x-ray company does not come to the facility if there is an x-ray needed any time after 5:00 PM and before 8:00 AM. She also stated the nurse was expected to complete a pain assessment or document in the nurses notes of Resident #1 complaining about her knee and the knee swelling. She stated the nurse on duty that night was responsible for documenting on Resident #1 on 09/18/2023. In an interview on 09/20/2023 at 2:41 PM the COTA/Marketing Coordinator stated she heard Resident #1 yelling for help around 6:00 PM on 09/18/2023. She stated when she entered Resident #1's room at approximately 6:05 PM Resident #1 was needing assistance to be transferred to her bed from her recliner. She stated she explained to the resident she needed to find a gait belt and get someone to help her with the transfer. The COTA / Marketing Coordinator stated she asked PTA C to assist her transferring Resident #1. She stated the PTA assisted her with Resident #1's transfer from the recliner to wheelchair. She stated Resident #1 complained about back pain. The COTA/Marketing Coordinator also stated Resident #1's wheelchair was positioned beside the bed to transfer onto her bed. She stated she was in front of the resident, and they placed the gait belt on the resident and assisted her from the wheelchair. They pivoted the resident for her to sit on the bed. She stated resident was not yelling during the transfer, however, within few seconds of the resident sitting on the bed the resident began to yell my knee hurts. She stated Resident #1 repeated stating her knee hurt. The COTA/ Marketing Coordinator stated she and PTA C assisted the resident to lie in bed in a supine position (resident is face up with their head resting on a pad positioner or pillow),and that was when she noticed Resident #1's knee began to swell. She stated Resident #1 complained of her pain being at 10 on a pain scale of zero being in no pain to ten being in extreme pain. She stated the PTA stayed in the room and she left the room to report that to the LVN A at approximately 6:30 PM. She stated LVN A did not go to Resident #1's room to assess the resident. She stated LVN A was at her nurses' cart preparing to administer medications. She stated she explained to LVN A Resident #1 was in extreme pain in her left knee and the knee was swelling. She stated she stayed at the facility until she knew Resident #1 was going to be seen by the nurse. She stated it was approximately 8:30 PM when the nurse entered Resident #1's room for the first time after she reported Resident #1's pain and swelling to LVN A. She stated she did become frustrated with LVN A ignoring Resident #1's pain and knee swelling that she told her just give Me the medicine and she will give it to her. She stated she could not stand to see Resident #1 in pain any longer and the nurse would not come to the Resident #1's room. The COTA/ Marketing Coordinator stated she got the pain medication from the nurse and took it to Resident #1 and gave the pain medication narco to Resident #1. She stated after numerous times of reporting to LVN A to go assess Resident #1, the LVN A stated the resident is always in pain that is not anything new. The COTA/ Marketing Coordinator stated she was so upset because she stated she kept reporting to LVN A about Resident #1's condition with her left knee and she continued to ignore her. She also stated she called the Administrator on 09/18/2023 ( did not recall the time). She stated she informed the Administrator Resident #1 had pain and swelling in the left knee. She stated the Administrator advised her to speak with the nurse and explain to the nurse to call the MD and have x-rays ordered. She stated she spoke with LVN A and explained the Administrator stated to call the MD and have x-rays ordered. She stated LVN A was organizing to pass out medications and began to pass medications and there was not an emergency occurring where she could not stop what she was doing and go to Resident #1's room. She stated she did not feel comfortable leaving Resident #1 on 09/18/2023 due to LVN A not going to Resident #1's room to complete an assessment on her or giving her pain medication when Resident #1 was in pain more than an hour before LVN A gave me the pain medication to give to Resident #1. She stated she had to do something because Resident #1's left knee swelling was increasing, and the pain was getting a lot worse. In an interview on 09/20/2023 at 3:41 PM LVN D stated Resident #1 yells out frequently. She stated when she is yelling, she is in pain. LVN D stated the resident complains about her back hurting. She stated everyone knew Resident #1 yelled frequently when she was in pain. She stated there were times when she was speaking to Resident #1, and she was complaining/ yelling with pain, and she would administer her ordered pain medication without asking Resident #1 where she was hurting or her pain level. She stated she has not ever completed a pain assessment on Resident #1 but now she realized she was required to complete a pain assessment and document in the nurses notes about Resident #1's pain. She also stated the nurses were expected to ask where the pain was located and the pain level on a scale of zero-ten. She stated zero was- no pain and ten was extreme pain. She stated due to Resident #1 complaining about pain all the time the nurses would give her the pain medication if it was scheduled and not ask her any questions. She stated if she had been working on the night of 09/18/2023 and Resident #1 was complaining about pain in her knee she would have given her pain medication and probably would not have asked any questions or completed any type of incident report or pain assessment due to Resident #1always complained about pain. She stated that was her normal behavior. LVN D stated the resident did not have any behavior problems. She stated she would yell but only when she was in pain. She stated Resident #1 was cooperative with staff and did not have any behavior issues. LVN D stated she has given care to Resident #1 numerous times. She stated it varied from week to week, but she was very familiar with Resident #1's physical condition, moods, and behaviors. LVN D stated Resident #1 will yell out when she is in pain. She stated she had severe back pain and had an MRI. She also stated when Resident #1 was in pain she did not assess the resident to determine if it was a new pain or pain from her back. She stated everyone knows if Resident #1 is in pain she will yell, and they do not assess the pain very closely when giving pain medication. She stated the nurses gives her anti -anxiety medication to prevent her from yelling. She also stated she did not believe any assessment was required when she was yelling about pain in her knee. She stated she was not working on 09/18/2023 but she would not have completed a pain assessment on resident. In an interview on 09/20/2023 at 8:11 PM Resident #1's family member stated he witnessed from the camera in Resident #1's room on 09/18/2023 at 5:51 PM, staff breaking Resident #1's leg, Resident #1 complaining of pain and staff saying back to Resident #1 you know you're not hurt. He stated the staff said to Resident #1 she complained about her back hurting before too and it was nothing. He stated staff did not call the family to notify them of the incident until 09/19/2023 and an ambulance was called to transfer Resident #1 to the hospital on [DATE]. He also stated when the staff began to realize Resident #1 was in pain one of the staff turned the volume up on the television where it was difficult at times after those statements to hear what staff was saying. On 09/21/2023 at 11:00 AM, attempted to contact LVN A and was unable to leave a message. On 09/21/2023 at 11:05 AM, attempted to contact CNA H and left a voice message . CNA H was in Resident #1's room for few minutes on 09/18/2023. In an interview on 09/21/2023 at 12:00 PM, PTA C stated the COTA/ Marketing Coordinator asked her to help her transfer Resident #1 from her recliner to the wheelchair and then to the bed. She stated that occurred 09/18/2023 approximately 6:00 PM. She stated Resident #1 was transferred from the recliner to the wheelchair and Resident #1 complained about her back hurting after the transfer. She stated Resident #1 was assisted by the bed in her wheelchair to prepare for the transfer from the wheelchair to the bed. She stated once Resident #1 was in her wheelchair by the bed she was calm and quit complaining about her back hurting. PTA C stated the COTA/ Marketing Coordinator was in front of the resident and placed the gait belt around the resident's waist. She stated they began to transfer Resident #1 to the bed and as soon as they pivoted Resident #1 onto the bed, she began to yell her knee hurt. PTA C stated she assumed it was similar of her complaining about her back pain. She stated at some point Resident #1 stated her left leg was broken. PTA C also stated she realized that was a different type of pain than what she has complained in the past. She stated the COTA/ Marketing Coordinator left the room to report to LVN A. She stated they kept waiting on pain medication or the nurse to assess Resident #1 due to her knee continuing to swell and becoming larger. She stated Resident #1 would yell in pain when her leg was barely touched or moved. Resident #1 would rub her knee and below the knee onto her left leg and stated it was broken. PTA C stated LVN A would not go to Resident #1's room to give her pain medication or assess her. She stated the nurse gave the PT/ Marketing Coordinator the pain medication and the COTA/ Marketing Coordinator gave Resident #1 the pain medication. PTA C stated she did not recall the time, but she thought it was around 7:00 PM. She stated LVN A entered Resident #1's room at approximately 8:30 PM. She stated she was in the room while LVN A talked to Resident #1. PTA C stated LVN A looked at Resident #1's knee for approximately 5 seconds and stated her knee is fine. PTA C stated LVN A did not assess Resident #1 or ask her if she was hurting in other areas. She stated LVN A did not ask Resident #1 what her pain level was or if the pain medication was effective. She also stated LVN A did not realize PTA C was in the room. PTA C stated when LVN A saw her in the room she stated oh are you a family member I did not know anyone was in the room. PTA C stated, no I am not a family member I am a Physical Therapist Assistant at this facility, and I helped assist Resident #1 to be when she began complaining about her knee. PTA C stated LVN A did not ask her any questions about the transfer or anything about Resident #1. PTA C stated she informed LVN A that she and the COTA/ Marketing Coordinator had been in the room with Resident #1 since around 6:00 PM after she began complaining about pain in her left knee and stating her left leg was broken. She stated LVN A walked out of the room and stated she is fine; she always complains about pain. She also stated LVN A was preparing to pass out medications and began to pass out meds to residents and there was not an emergency and LVN A could have stopped what she was doing and came to Resident #1's room. In an interview on 09/21/2023 at 2:45 PM the Administrator stated the COTA/ Marketing Coordinator contacted her on 09/18/2023 in the evening. She stated she did not recall the exact time. She stated she was informed Resident #1 had pain and some swelling in her left knee. She stated she asked the COTA/Marketing Coordinator to inform the nurse to contact the physician and request an x-ray to be ordered. The Administrator stated anytime a resident complained of pain whether it was an old or new pain she expected a pain assessment to be completed. She stated LVN A was expected to assess Resident #1 and ask the staff who was in Resident #1's room questions and contact the DON with the information. She stated LVN A did not follow protocol of assessing Resident #1, completing a pain assessment, and asked staff questions of how Resident #1 knee began to swell and why Resident # 1 believed her leg was broken. The Administrator stated Resident #1 needed an x-ray on 09/18/2023 and if the x-ray company could not come to the facility, the nurse was expected to call the MD and request for Resident #1 to be sent to the emergency room that night. She stated if Resident #1 was in pain and complaining of her left knee being broken on 09/18/2023, 911 needed to be called and EMS transfer her to the hospital. She stated anytime a resident complains of pain the nurse was expected to ask the resident where the pain was located , the level of the pain, and to document all that information in the nurses notes and complete a pain assessment. She stated if Resident #1 had new pain after a transfer, the nurse was expected to ask the staff questions about the transfer, immediately do an assessment, and begin an incident report (reviewed incident reports and did not observe any incident reports of this incident of Resident #1 on 09/18/2023) if needed. She stated the nurse was expected to contact the DON with the information and after she contacted the physician, then call 911 to transfer Resident #1 to emergency room. The Administrator stated it was not best practice to have a resident in the facility from the night of 09/18/2023 until the morning of 09/19/2023 in pain with a possible left leg or knee fracture. She stated it was the DON's responsibility to monitor the nurses to ensure they are following protocol. In an interview on 09/22/2023 at 8:40 AM Med Aide E stated she had given medications to Resident #1 except pain medications and her anxiety medications. She stated whenever Resident #1 has reported to her she was in pain she would inform the nurse. She stated Resident #1 did not exhibit any behavior problems; however, she would yell only when in pain. She stated other than yelling she was not aware of any behavior problems with Resident #1. She also stated if a resident had new pain and was complaining for hours of being in pain and had stated her leg or knee was broken, the resident needed to be transferred to emergency room immediately. Med Aide E stated Resident #1 was alert and oriented and was able to verbalize her pain, and the nurse needed to listen to Resident #1 and should know it could be serious and needed immediate medical attention in the hospital. She stated she would continue to ask the nurse to send a resident to hospital if the resident was complaining of knee pain, if the knee was swollen, and if resident stated her leg was broken. In an interview on 09/22/2023 at 9:05 AM, LVN B stated Resident #1 did complain about pain frequently. LVN B stated the resident did not have any behavior problems except for yelling when she was in pain. She stated whenever a resident complained about pain, the nurse was expected to ask where the pain was located and complete a pain scale assessment with zero indicated no pain and ten indicated extreme pain. She stated that was to be documented in the nurses notes at the time of administer the pain medication. LVN B also stated the nurse was expected to speak to the resident within 2 hours and determine if the pain medication was effective. She stated a pain assessment was required whenever a resident was in pain. She stated she had given medications to Resident #1 when she had been in pain. She also stated there should be more than one pain assessment completed on Resident #1 due to her having pain a lot. She stated a nurse giving the resident pain medication since she had been admitted should have completed a pain assessment on Resident #1. She stated the nurse would document the pain level on the MAR when they interact with a resident. LVN B stated, however, the resident may have pain during the shift and there was not a place on the MAR to document that pain. She stated when a resident had pain during the shift where the pain is located, and the pain level was required to be documented in the nurses notes prior to administering pain medication. She also stated if the pain was not a zero, a pain assessment was required to be completed. She stated she was surprised that only MDS Nurse completed a pain assessment. In an interview on 09/22/2023 at 9:55 AM, LVN F stated if any staff reported a resident was having a new pain and their knee was swelling, she would immediately go to that resident's room and assess the resident. She stated she would complete a pain assessment and if resident were in severe pain and has stated her leg was broken, she would contact the MD immediately and if the MD did not return call within 5 minutes, she would immediately call 911. She stated if a nurse did not complete an assessment on the resident or ask the other staff questions of what might have caused the knee to swell, she did not follow proper protocol. LVN F stated the nurse was expected to assess residents whenever there is a change of condition and a new pain in the knee with swelling and the resident yelling her leg was broken, that is a change of condition. She stated she did not give care very often to Resident #1, but she did know Resident #1 would yell when she was only in pain. She stated Resident #1 should not have stayed in the facility all night if she said her left leg was broken, if her left knee was swelling, and she was in extreme pain . She stated Resident #1 needed to be transferred to the emergency room the night of 09/18/2023. She stated anytime a resident voices pain to a nurse, or another staff reports a resident was in pain the nurse was to complete pain assessment. She stated the nurse was required to ask the resident where the pain is located and the pain level using the pain scale of zero which indicated no pain and a ten which indicated extreme pain. She s[TRUNCATED]
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0726 (Tag F0726)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that licensed nurses had the specific competencies and skills...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that licensed nurses had the specific competencies and skills sets necessary to care for residents' needs as identified through resident assessments and described in the plan of care for one of one resident (Resident #1) one of one nurses and one of one COTA reviewed for competent nursing staff. The facility failed to ensure nursing staff were properly trained and nursing staff failed to report to management when the nurse gave the COTA a pain pill to administer to Resident #1. This failure could place residents at risk for serious injury, serious harm, serious impairment, or death. The findings include: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 09/22/2023, revealed Resident #1 was an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses which included low back pain ( pain between the lower edge of the ribs), signs symptoms of musculoskeletal system ( mild to severe aches, low back pain, numbness, tingling, atrophy, and weakness), muscle weakness ( a lack of strength in the muscles), osteoporosis without current pathological fracture (generally caused by a fall from a standing height or lower and usually involves the spine, hip or wrist), lack of coordination (uncoordinated movement due to a muscle control problem that causes an inability to coordinate movements) left foot drop ( caused by weakness of the muscles involved in lifting the front part of the foot) and, abnormalities of gait and mobility (when a person is unable to walk in the usually way). Record review of Resident #1's Annual MDS assessment, dated 07/28/2023, reflected Resident #1 had a BIMS score of fifteen, which indicated the residents' cognition was intact. Resident did not reject care. Resident #1 was assessed to require extensive assistance by two staff members for transfers. She required extensive assistance by one staff for bed mobility and toileting. Resident #1 was also assessed to require limited assistance by one staff for personal hygiene. She was assessed require staff to stabilize her when moving from seated to standing position, moving on and off toilet, and surface-to-surface transfer. Resident #1 was on scheduled pain medication and PRN pain medication. She had frequent pain. Resident #1 did not exhibit any behaviors. Record review of Resident #1's Comprehensive Care Plan completed on 08/17/2023 reflected Resident #1 had an ADL self-care performance deficit. Interventions: resident required extensive assistance by two staff members with transfers. Resident #1 required extensive assistance by one staff members with bed mobility. Resident #1 was at risk for falls related to gait/balance problems. She had limited physical mobility. Resident had chronic pain related to osteoporosis (a condition when bone strength weakens) Interventions: anticipate the resident's need for pain relief and respond immediately to any complaint of pain. Identify and record previous pain history and management of that pain and impact of function. Identify previous response to analgesia including pain relief, side effects and impact on function. Monitor/ document for probable cause of each pian episode. Remove/limit causes where possible. Resident #1's further interventions were: Monitor/document for side effects of pain medication. Administer analgesia as per orders. Give ½ hour before treatments or care. Notify the physician if interventions are unsuccessful or if current complaint is a significant change from resident's experience of pain. Provide the resident and family with information about pain and options available for pain management. Discuss and resident preferences . Record Review of the video provided by the family member on 9/18/2023 reflected COTA/ Marketing Coordinator and PTA was in Resident #1's room. The COTA/ Marketing Coordinator exited Resident #1 room at 6:09 PM. PTA stayed in Resident #1 room and was talking to Resident #1. Resident #1 stated several times I think it is broken as she was rubbing her left leg. COTA/ Marketing Coordinator entered Resident #1's room and at 6:12 PM she began to open the small clear plastic pouch with medication been crushed and poured it into a medication cup. COTA/ Marketing Coordinator opened a small container of apple sauce and put apple sauce in the medication cup with the medication. COTA / Marketing Coordinator began to stir the medication in the cup and at 6:13 PM the PTA poured some more crushed medication into the cup. COTA /Marketing Coordinator asked Resident #1 if she wanted her medicine. She also asked Resident #1 if she wanted to take one big bite and at 6:13 PM COTA/ Marketing Coordinator gave Resident #1 her medication. COTA/Marketing Coordinator asked Resident #1 how long it took for her medicine to help her. Record review of Resident #1's medication administration record for the month of 09/2023 reflected on 09/18/2023 there was not any medication signed out by anyone around the time of 6:09 PM. The PRN medication was signed out be LVN A at 6:50 PM and at 11:41 PM. In an interview on 09/20/2023 at 2:41 PM, the COTA /Marketing Coordinator stated she reported to LVN A on 09/18/2023 from 6:00 PM, until approximately 09/18/2023 at 8:25 PM of Resident #1 complaining of pain in knee and left leg. She stated she also reported to LVN A that Resident #1 was making statements her knee was broken. She stated she explained to LVN A Resident #1 was in severe pain. She stated LVN A made the remark that that is normal for Resident #1, she was always complaining about being in pain and that was nothing new. The COTA/Marketing Coordinator stated LVN A was informed of the information at approximately 6:10 PM and LVN A did not go to Resident #1's room until approximately 8:30 PM. She stated either she or the PTA was always in Resident #1's room from around 6:00 PM until 8:45 PM. She stated LVN A would not go to Resident #1's room to administer pain medication and the resident was in pain for at almost 2 hours. She stated she asked LVN A to give her the pain medication and she would administer it to Resident #1. She stated LVN A gave her the pain medication (Norco) and she gave it to Resident #1. She stated she could not sit by and watch Resident #1 be in pain for an hour or more and the nurse refused to go to Resident #1's room due to believing Resident #1 was complaining for no reason. She stated it was difficult to even talk to LVN A due to her expressing no compassion towards Resident #1 and not wanting to assess her to determine if anything was wrong with Resident #1. She also stated she called the Administrator on 09/18/2023 (did not recall the time). She stated she informed the Administrator of Resident #1's pain and swelling in the left knee. She stated the Administrator advised her to speak with the nurse and explain to the nurse to call the MD and have x-rays ordered. She stated she spoke with LVN A and explained the Administrator stated to call the MD and have x-rays ordered. She stated LVN A was organizing to pass out medications and began to pass medications and there was not an emergency occurring where she could not stop what she was doing to go to Resident #1's room. She stated she did not feel comfortable leaving Resident #1 on 09/18/2023 due to LVN A not going to Resident #1's room to complete an assessment or make any type of observation of why Resident #1 was in extreme pain. She stated Resident #1's left knee continued to become larger, and she was going to report Resident #1's condition approximately every 10 minutes and the nurse stated to the COTA/Marketing Coordinator that Resident #1 was ok, that is the way Resident #1 always was and there was not anything wrong with Resident #1. She stated around 8:30 PM LVN A entered Resident #1's room and stated Resident #1's left knee does not look any different than it has in the past. The COTA/Marketing Coordinator stated that LVN A informed her and PTA C to go home, she had this and promised to take care of Resident # 1. She stated LVN A did not assess Resident #1. The COTA/Marketing Coordinator stated when she came on duty on 09/19/2023 the ambulance was in front of the facility transferring Resident #1 to the hospital. She stated she was shocked and could not believe LVN A allowed Resident #1 to remain in the facility that night without getting an x-ray or doing anything to ensure Resident #1 did not have any broken bones. The COTA/Marketing Coordinator stated she did believe LVN A was neglecting Resident #1. She stated LVN A refused to go to Resident #1's room and complete an assessment approximately 2 hours after being informed of Resident #1's left knee/leg pain and Resident #1 stating she thought her leg was broken. She stated she was upset, and the nurse ignored her whenever she reported anything about Resident #1. She stated LVN A neglected Resident #1 on 09/18/2023. In an interview on 09/21/2023 at 12:00 PM, PTA C stated the COTA/ Marketing Coordinator asked her to help her transfer Resident #1 from her recliner to the wheelchair and then to the bed. She stated that occurred 09/18/2023 approximately 6:00 PM. She stated Resident #1 was transferred from the recliner to the wheelchair and Resident #1 complained about her back hurting after the transfer. She stated Resident #1 was assisted by the bed in her wheelchair to prepare for the transfer from the wheelchair to the bed. She stated once Resident #1 was in her wheelchair by the bed she was calm and quit complaining about her back hurting. PTA C stated the COTA/ Marketing Coordinator was in front of the resident and placed the gait belt around the resident's waist. She stated they began to transfer Resident #1 to the bed and as soon as they pivoted Resident #1 onto the bed, she began to yell her knee hurt. PTA C stated she assumed it was similar of her complaining about her back pain. She stated at some point Resident #1 stated her left leg was broken. PTA C also stated she realized that was a different type of pain than what she has complained in the past. She stated the COTA/ Marketing Coordinator left the room to report to LVN A. She stated they kept waiting on pain medication or the nurse to assess Resident #1 due to her knee continuing to swell and becoming larger. She stated Resident #1 would yell in pain when her leg was barely touched or moved. Resident #1 would rub her knee and below the knee onto her left leg and stated it was broken. PTA C stated LVN A would not go to Resident #1's room to give her pain medication or assess her. She stated the nurse gave the COTA/ Marketing Coordinator the pain medication and the COTA/ Marketing Coordinator gave Resident #1 the pain medication. PTA C stated she did not recall the time, but she thought it was around 7:00 PM. She stated LVN A entered Resident #1's room at approximately 8:30 PM. She stated she was in the room while LVN A talked to Resident #1. PTA C stated LVN A looked at Resident #1's knee for approximately 5 seconds and stated her knee is fine. PTA C stated LVN A did not assess Resident #1 or ask her if she was hurting in other areas. She stated LVN A did not ask Resident #1 what her pain level was or if the pain medication was effective. She also stated LVN A did not realize PTA C was in the room. PTA C stated when LVN A saw her in the room she stated, oh are you a family member I did not know anyone was in the room. PTA C stated, no I am not a family member I am a Physical Therapist Assistant at this facility, and I helped assist Resident #1 to be when she began complaining about her knee PTA C stated LVN A did not ask her any questions about the transfer or anything about Resident #1. PTA C stated she informed LVN A that she and the COTA/ Marketing Coordinator had been in the room with Resident #1 since around 6:00 PM after she began complaining about pain in her left knee and stating her left leg was broken. She stated LVN A walked out of the room and stated she is fine; she always complains about pain. She also stated LVN A was preparing to pass out medications and began to pass out meds to residents and there was not an emergency and LVN A could have stopped what she was doing and came to Resident #1's room. 1. In an interview on 10/18/2023 at 11:35 AM, the Director of Nurses stated only a licensed nurse or a medication aide was the only staff to administer any type of medication to a resident. She stated a non-nurse staff would not know if she was administering the correct medication. She stated it was not the facilities protocol for a non-nurse to administer any medication. She stated a resident could choke and there were protocols to follow when administering medications such as: ensuring it is the correct person by viewing the resident picture on the medication administration record, the nurse required to check to ensure it was the correct medication, ensure it was given at the right time and it was the right dose. She stated if a non-nurse was giving the medication how did that person know the nurse completed all of these precautions prior to placing medicine in the cup and give the medication to the non-nurse. She stated this is not the facility protocol. In an interview on 10/19/2023 at 10:40 AM, Med Aide E stated she had been a Med Aide approximately 10 or 15 years and she stated she was taught in med-aide class it was not protocol for a med-aide or a nurse to give medication to a non -nurse staff to administer to a resident. She stated if a nurse or med-aide signs the medication administration form that the nurse or med-aide gave the medication and then give the medication to a non-nurse, a nurse or med-aide could lose their license. She stated anything could go wrong with a non -nurse administering any type of medication. Med Aide E stated how does the nurse knows the non -nursing staff will give it to the resident. She also stated there were certain residents required their medication be administered a certain way such as in pudding or may need extra water to ensure the resident swallowed the pill. She stated this was against nursing protocol and she would never allow anyone give medication she had put her initial on the medication administration record. She stated whoever signs the record they are responsible for the medication. Med-Aide E also stated if a nurse gave medication to a non-nurse staff the nurse was 100 percent wrong. She stated a resident could choke on the medication, may pocket the medication, and not swallow the medicine. She stated there was a cluster of mistakes possibly could occur with the resident. She also stated when administering medications, the nurse or med-aide was expected to look at the picture on the MAR prior to administering the medication. She stated she had been in serviced on medications on 10/19/2023 from the ADON. She stated the ADON discussed all medications was only to be administered by nurses and med-aides and if you are not a licensed nurse or medication- aide do not take any medications from the nurse or medication aide and administer the medication to a resident. In an interview on 10/19/2023 at 10:50 AM CNA P stated she received an in-service on medications from the ADON on 10/19/2023. She stated anyone who was not a nurse or medication -aide was not to give medicines to a resident or take medications from the nurse or med-aide. In an interview on 10/19/2023 at 11:15 AM, LVN D stated the ADON gave an in-service on 10/19/2023 about not giving medications to a non-nurse staff for them to administer medication to a resident. She stated it could be dangerous for the resident if a non-nurse gave a resident medication. She stated a resident could choke and how did the nurse know the staff would not take the medication themselves and not give it to the resident. She stated when she gives medications, she views the medical medication record and compares it to the medicine located in the package. She stated when she determined it was the correct medication, she would place the pills in a medicine cup. She stated after she completed this process with all the medicines a resident takes, she would compare the resident to the picture on the mar and then administer the medication. She stated if a resident required medications to be crushed, she would crush the medicines. She stated a resident receiving medication from a non-nurse may choke or have difficulty with swallowing med or may prefer to take the medication a certain way such as place the pill in a certain area in the resident's mouth. In an interview on 10/19/2023 at 1:00 PM the Administrator stated she as in serviced on medications by the Corporate Nurse she stated a non-nurse was not qualified to administer medications. She stated only nurses and med-aides were qualified to administer medications. When asked her the potential of what may happen to a resident or with the medication if a non-nurse administer medication to a resident, the Administrator stated she was no clinical and was not answering any questions about medications or the potential result of non-nurse giving medications. That would be a nursing question not an Administrator question. She stated again she was not clinical and don't know what a nurse was supposed to do when administering medications. I will have to refer to the facility policy and protocol I am not familiar with it at this time. When the Administrator was asked if she was not in serviced by the corporate nurse today, she stated I will not answer any questions. The administrator left the conference room and did not return for further interview. 2. In an interview on 10/19/2023 at 1:20 PM the ADON stated she stated gave in-service on 10/19/2023 to all staff about medications. She stated she in serviced all staff related to only licensed nurses and medication-aides were the only staff to administer any type of medication to a resident. She stated there was a possibility a resident could choke when given a medication and if a non-nurse was giving the medication there were several negative possibilities could happen to the resident. The ADON stated she could keep naming them, but she believed point was made of negative outcome with possible choking. She stated there were 5 rights on giving medications. She stated all nurses and med-aides was expected to follow the 5 rights: Right Person, Right Medication, Right Route, Right Time, Right Dosage The ADON stated when a nurse was administering medication it was expected for the nurse to view the resident picture in the medication administration record and to ensure when administering the medication, it was to the right person and had the right dose and medication. She stated as a nurse she would not expect a non-nurse to administer medications. She stated she did not have any idea how the non -nurse would know if she was giving the right medication. The ADON also stated she did not know why the nurse gave the medication to the non-nurse. She stated she was not aware of the knowledge the non-nurse had about medications. Record Review of the in-service on Medication Administration given by the ADON ( the in-service was not dated but was verified by the Administrator this was the in-service given to all the staff by the ADON. The in-service consists of the following: 1. All medications should only be administered by a licensed nurse or medication aide. 2. If you are not a licensed nurse or medication aide. Do not take medication from a licensed nurse or medication aide and administer the medication to a resident. Record Review of in-service on Medication Administration given by the Administrator and Corporate Clinical Specialist on 10/19/2023. A video was shown to all staff on medication administration training from the corporate you tube video. The video explained how to administer medication correctly. There were not any details about the video shared prior to exit. Record Review of in-service on medications not dated, however, it came from a binder dated January 2023 to June 2023. The in-service was on medications need to be given in a timely manner. Medication times are part of the five medication rights such as: 1. Right person 2. Right medication 3. Right time 4. Right route 5. Right dosage LVN A attended this in-service. Record Review of the facility policy on Administering Medications dated 04/2019 reflected the following: 1. Only persons licensed or permitted by this state to prepare, administer, and document the administration of medications may do so. 2. The individual administering medications verifies the resident's identity before giving the resident his/her medications. 3. The individual administering the medication checks the label three times to verify the right resident, right medication, right dosage, right time, and right method of administration before giving the medication. The individual administering the medication initials the resident's medication administration records in the resident's medical record: the date and time the medication was administered, the dosage, the route of the administration, any complaints or symptoms for which the drug was administered, any results achieved and when those results were observed and the signature and title of the person administering the drug.
Jul 2023 3 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement comprehensive care plans that includes measurable object...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement comprehensive care plans that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment. for one (Resident #27) of three residents reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to implement a comprehensive care plan for Resident #27. This failure could place residents at risk of not meeting their immediate needs, long term and or short-term goals, and and interventions. Findings included: Record review of Resident #27's admission MDS dated [DATE] revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Hemiplegia (paralysis) affecting the left side, Diabetes Mellitus (high blood sugar), and Hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol). With a BIMs of 15 (cognitively intact). Resident #27 is visually impaired, with verbal behavioral symptoms towards others, she requires limited to extensive assistance with ADLs, she requires set up and supervision during meals, and has occasional incontinence. Record review of Resident #27's Care Plans revealed there was a total of three care plans initiated on 6/20/23. The care plans available were the use of antidepressant (Sertraline), the use of antipsychotic (Keppra), and the use of anti-anxiety (Hydroxyzine). Further investigation revealed there were no person-centered comprehensive care plans available. Record review of Resident #27's Fall Scale Evaluation dated 6/11/23 revealed she was a high fall risk. Record review of Residents #27's care plans dated 6/20/23 revealed there was no short-term or long-term fall care plan was available. Interview with LVN E on 07/13/23 at 11:46 AM revealed the MDS nurse was the one responsible for doing the person-centered comprehensive care plans. MDS nurse does care plans for new admissions and updates them for short-term and long-term issues. She stated the charge nurses do not do any care plans; they only do the baseline care plan assessment upon admission. She stated that the risk of not having up to date care plans could be that the nurses would not know the right interventions for the residents, and they would not get adequate care. Interview with MDS F on 07/13/23 at 12:52 PM revealed MDS was responsible for completing all care plans with the help of the DON. She stated the DON opened the care plans on admission, and she completed them within 7 days of completing the MDS assessment. She stated she was responsible for both short term and long-term care plans. She stated the short-term care plans were updated during morning meetings and long-term care plans were updated with MDS assessments. She cannot recall any breakdown or issues with care plans being missed. Interview and record review with MDS F on 07/13/23 at 2:09 PM revealed Resident #27 did not have comprehensive care plans and there were only three medication care plans available. She stated there should be more care plans to include other areas for the residents such as medical care, behavioral care, activities, dietary, fall prevention, and they should be person centered, she was not sure how they were missed. She stated the risk of not having up to date care plans could lead to complications and further decline of the resident. To avoid missing care plans she stated she will bring her laptop to their morning meetings to assess any short-term and long-term changes of the residents and discuss with IDT. Record review of Resident #27's Care Plan dated 06/20/2023, revealed person-centered comprehensive care plans were initiated and created on 07/13/23. Comprehensive care plans were provided at the conclusion of the survey. Interview with ADON/Staffing Coordinator on 07/13/23 at 2:13 PM revealed MDS F and DON were responsible for care plans, which also included the comprehensive person-centered care plans. MDS F also was responsible to complete the short-term and long-term care plans. She stated the CNAs could see the interventions for the residents based on the [NAME]. She stated her expectation was that the care plans would be completed according to the facility policy. She also stated the risk for the care plans not being up to date would be the CNAs and nurses would not know how to properly care for the resident. Interview with CNA G on 07/13/23 at 2:18 PM revealed she would be able to see how to care for the residents by looking in the [NAME]. This is where she would be able to see if the resident had specific interventions like if they are a fall risk. Interview with DON on 07/13/23 at 2:22 PM revealed MDS nurse was responsible to complete short-term and long-term person-centered comprehensive care plans. She stated that she opened them on admission and MDS F completed them within 7 days of completing the MDS assessment. She stated her expectation was that the care plans should be documented within the patient chart that includes goals and interventions. Her expectation was that MDS F would update care plans quarterly and as needed. Missing care plans for Resident #27 would be reviewed along with all residents moving forward to ensure completion. Risks to residents of gaps in care plans would be they would not be cared for properly. Record review of policy titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered with a revision date of [DATE] revealed comprehensive, person-centered care plans will be developed within 7 days of the completion of the required comprehensive assessment (MDS). It also revealed that comprehensive, person-centered care plans that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the residents physical, psychosocial, and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0727 (Tag F0727)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to use the services of a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least eight cons...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to use the services of a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week in the facility for 9 (RN coverage days) of 101 days reviewed for RN coverage. The ADON/Staffing Coordinator failed to have an effective documentation and tracking system and was unaware of which RN's worked when she reviewed the schedule sheets and based on the timesheets, there was not 8 hours of RN Coverage on: 05/13/23, 05/14/23, 05/29/23, 06/11/23, 06/22/23, 07/06/23, 07/07/23, 07/09/23 and 07/10/23. These failures could place all residents at risk of not having an adequate amount of higher level nursing services which could result in a decline in the residents mental, physical and psycho-social well-being. Findings included: Record review of the facility's staff roster, undated indicated the facility had two RN Nurse Supervisors and one DON. Record review of the facility's 672 CMS form (Resident Census and Conditions of Residents) dated 07/13/23 revealed a census of 29 residents. Record review of the Facility's May Staff Schedule Sheet from 05/01/23 to 05/31/23 revealed no RN Coverage for 24 days: 05/01/23, 05/02/23, 05/03/23, 05/04/23, 05/05/23, 05/07/23, 05/08/23, 05/09/23, 05/10/23, 05/11/23, 05/12/23, 05/15/23, 05/16/23, 05/17/23, 05/18/23, 05/19/23, 05/22/23, 05/23/23, 05/24/23, 05/25/23, 05/26/23, 05/29/23, 05/30/23 and 05/31/23. Record review of the Facility's June Staff Schedule Sheet from 06/01/23 to 06/30/23 revealed no RN Coverage for 19 days: 06/01/23, 06/02/23, 06/05/23, 06/06/23, 06/07/23, 06/08/23, 06/12/23, 06/13/23, 06/14/23, 06/15/23, 06/18/23, 06/20/23, 06/21/23, 06/22/23, 06/26/23, 06/27/23, 06/28/23, 06/29/23 and 06/30/23. Record review of the Facility's July Staff Schedule Sheet from 07/01/23 to 07/13/23 revealed no RN Coverage for 9 days: 07/03/23, 07/04/23, 07/05/23, 07/06/23, 07/07/23, 07/10/23, 07/11/23, 07/12/23 and 07/13/23. A) Record review of RN A's time sheets 05/01/23 to 07/04/23, provided by the ADON/Staffing/ Coordinator revealed she worked 8 hours or more per day on 05/06/23, 05/07/23, 05/20/23, 05/21/23, 05/27/23, 05/28/23, 06/03/23, 06/04/23, 06/09/23, 06/10/23, 06/19/23, 06/23/23, 07/01/23, 07/02/23 and 07/04/23. Record review of the Facility's Staff Schedule Sheets for May 2023, June 2023 and July 2023 revealed RN A worked 05/06/23, 05/13/23, 05/14/23, 05/20/23, 05/21/23, 05/27/23, 05/28/23. 06/03/23, 06/04/23, 06/10/23, 06/11/23, 06/17/23, 06/19/23, 07/01/23 and 07/02/23. B) Record review of RN B's time sheet dated 06/01/23 to 06/30/23, provided by ADON/Staffing Coordinator revealed she worked 8 hours or more on 06/17/23, 06/24/23 and 06/25/23. Record review of the Facility's Staff Schedule sheets for May 2023, June 2023 and July 2023 undated revealed RN B worked 05/06/23, 06/24/23 and 06/25/23. C) Record review of the DON's time sheets dated from 06/20/23 to 07/13/23, provided by the ADON/Staffing Coordinator revealed she worked 8 hours or more on 06/20/23, 06/21/23, 06/26/23, 06/27/23, 06/28/23, 06/29/23, 06/30/23, 07/03/23, 07/05/23, 07/11/23. Review of the Facility's Staff Schedule sheets for June 2023 and July 2023 undated revealed the DON did not work any days in June 2023 or July 2023. Record review of the facility's Direct Care Staff Daily Assignment Sheet/Sign in Sheets from 06/22/23 to 07/11/23, provided by ADON/Staffing Coordinator revealed the DON worked 06/22/23, 07/05/23, 07/06/23, 07/07/23, 07/10/23, 07/11/23. D)Record review of the facility's May 2023, June 2023 and July 2023 Schedule Sheets revealed the Clinical RN Clinical Specialist worked on 06/09/23, 06/16/23, and 06/23/23. E) Record review of the Staffing Agency time sheets dated 05/03/23, 05/04/23, 05/05/23, 06/18/23 and 07/08/23 revealed Shift details .RN nurse's name . shift resolution: Resolved .Provider Worked Shift. In the top right hand corner. F) Record review of the Staffing Agency time sheet dated 07/09/23 revealed, Shift opening, Shift details .Specialty: Registered Nurse did not have a RN nurse's name on it and no shift resolution and it did not indicate a provider worked shift, in the top right hand corner. Record review of the CMS PBJ Staffing Data Report ([DATE] - March 31 2023) run date 07/06/2023 revealed this facility triggered for A One star rating, No RN hours and failed to have licensing nursing coverage 24 hours/day revealed Infraction Dates: No RN hours 01/01 (SU); 01/03 (TU); 01/04 (WE); 01/05 (TH); 01/06 (FR); 01/09 (MO); 01/10 (TU); 01/11 (WE); 01/12; (TH); 01/13 (FR); 01/14 (SA); 01/15 (SU); 01/16 (MO); 01/17 (TU); 01/18 (WE); 01/19 (TH); 01/20 (FR); 01/21 (SA); 01/23 (MO); 01/24 (TU); 01/25 (WE); 01/26 (TH); 01/27 (FR); 01/30 (MO); 02/01 (WE); 02/07 (TU); 02/08 (WE); 02/09 (TH); 02/10 (FR); 02/13 (MO); 02/14 (TU); 02/15 (WE); 02/16; (TH); 02/17 (FR); 02/18 (SA); 02/19 (SU); 02/20 (MO); 02/21 (TU); 02/22 (WE); 02/23 (TH); 02/24 (FR); 02/25 (SA); 02/26 (SU); 03/01 (WE); 03/02 (TH); 03/03 (FR); 03/06 (MO); 03/07 (TU); 03/08 (WE); 03/09 (TH); 03/10 (FR); 03/11; (SA); 03/12 (SU); 03/14 (TU); 03/15 (WE); 03/16 (TH); 03/17 (FR); 03/20 (MO); 03/21 (TU); 03/22 (WE); 03/23 (TH); 03/24 (FR); 03/27 (MO); 03/28 (TU); 03/29 (WE); 03/30 (TH); 03/31 (FR) .Failed to have Licensed Nursing Coverage 24 Hours/Day 01/01 (SU); 01/03 (TU); 01/06 (FR); 01/07 (SA); 01/11 (WE); 01/14 (SA); 01/15 (SU); 01/20 (FR); 01/21; (SA); 01/25 (WE); 01/30 (MO); 02/09 (TH); 02/17 (FR); 02/18 (SA); 02/19 (SU); 02/22 (WE);03/18 (SA) . Record review of the PBJ Staffing Summary Report for 2023 2nd Quarter (01/01/23 - 03/31/23) run date 07/11/23 provided by the Administrator revealed staffing hours: One Registered Nurse Director of nursing - 45.00 hours, two Registered Nurses - 153.11 hours . Interview on 07/11/23 at 4:00 pm, the ADON/Staffing Coordinator stated they used Agency staffing for RN coverage at times and said since being at this facility for the past three months, they always had RN coverage. She stated they had a DON and two RN weekend supervisors. She stated she was responsible for ensuring they had enough RN's for the weekends and the DON worked Monday - Friday. She stated RN A worked every weekend and if she could not work she asked RN B about working and if she could not, she contacted the Staffing Agency for RN coverage. She stated the staff had to contact her four hours before their shift to call off. She stated they did not have enough staff and needed three LVN's and one PRN RN Supervisor to work the weekends. She stated she could only go back to 04/01/23 for the timesheets because they had a CHOW on 04/01/23. She stated RN coverage was needed because the LVN's practice only went so far like they could not pronounce a death, sign off on care plans, do picc line dressings and if staff ever had a question they had an RN to go to. She stated for 05/13/23 and 5/14/23 she was not sure if RN A worked those days and thought maybe a Corporate RN came in and RN A was sent home. She stated she was not told by the Administrator or anyone else if an RN agency nurse worked those days. Interview on 07/13/23 at 10:75 am, RN A stated she had retired and was an RN nurse who worked at this facility PRN and usually worked two weekends/four days out of the month and the other RN B covered working the other two weekends. She stated she did not work too often. She stated on 05/13/23 she worked for 4 hours and did not work 05/14/23 and thought RN filled in for her. She stated she was not sure if she worked 6/11/23 - 06/18/23 but she worked on 06/19/23, 06/23/23, 07/01/23, 07/02/23 and 07/04/23. She stated RN's were needed to make critical decisions and supervise the staff to ensure the residents had quality of care and was within the state regulations. Interview on 07/13/23 at 3:55 pm, RN B worked here at times as a PRN RN nurse and last worked here a few weekends back and passed out meds in June 2023 and was not sure if she worked 6/11/23 but did not work May 2023. She stated she had not worked July 2023 and added she was a PRN RN and RN A worked more than she did at this facility. Interview on 07/13/23 at 12:33 pm, the ADON/Staffing Coordinator stated RN A worked 06/11/23 and 06/12/23 and said she was not sure why RN A missed punch sheet was not filled out all the way showing she worked 06/11/23. She stated on 5/13/23 RN A worked four hours and was not sure why and would have to get on the phone and talked to her. She stated the Corporate RN's sat in her office but did keep up with when they worked and had no documentation to prove they worked. She stated on 07/09/23 she was not able to confirm an agency nurse worked because there was no RN listed on the time sheet form. She stated RN A covered pretty much every weekend. Interview on 07/13/23 at 2:29 pm, the DON stated she started work at this facility on 06/20/23 and had to call off work on 6/22/23 and 6/23/23 because she got sick and week after that on 07/06/23 and 07/07/23 she took off from work because she had a family emergency. She stated she was pretty sure the facility had RN coverage as far as she knew. She stated they had two RN Supervisors and herself working at this facility and the designated RN supervisor for the weekends was RN A and RN B was the other RN who worked the other weekends. She stated they also used agency nurses for RN coverage at times and stated she was not aware of any inconsistencies with the RN timesheets and schedule sheets. She stated the ADON/staffing coordinator was responsible for ensuring they had sufficient RN coverage. She stated the facility needed 8 hours of RN coverage for supervision of the clinical staff, the LVN's and CNA's and was a state regulation. She stated they did not have a nurse waiver in place and stated if there was no RN at the facility no one would be able to pronounce a death, pull picc line, have a delegation of duties and supervision of the staff. She stated her expectations for RN coverage was to meet the standard for RN coverage. Interview on 07/13/23 at 2:50 pm, the Clinical RN Specialist stated they did not have any nursing waivers and this facility had a CHOW on April 1, 2023, and added they had proof of RN coverage at all times and if the facility did not have RN coverage in the building she or other Corporate RN's worked. She stated her and the other corporate RN hours did not sign the sign in sheets. She stated she was not sure why the Agency RN's name was not on the timesheet for 07/09/23 and thought the RN who worked had not logged in her time yet. She stated the ADON/Staffing Coordinator was good about letting her know when they needed to get an Agency RN and believed RN A worked the weekends but was not sure if she worked every weekend. She stated RN B worked but was not sure how often she worked here and the last time she worked here was last month. She stated they were trying to hire more RN's by posting on the job board Indeed. She stated the facility needed 8 hours RN coverage daily for overseeing the LVN's and making sure they were not doing anything out of their scope, communication with the Doctors and family members and took the DON duties on the weekends and to ensure everyone was being taken care of. She stated the RN's assisted with the resident's plan of care, removing picc lines, pronouncing death, changing out central lines and hub needles. She stated ADON/Staffing Coordinator tried to get the nursing schedule created a week in advance and if someone called off and she could not find a replacement she would let her know. She stated they had a policy that the staff must call the ADON/Staffing coordinator no later than two hours prior to starting their shift. She stated she was not aware of any inconsistencies between the time sheets and assignment sheets and added they had a good system with tracking the RN coverage hours. She stated the training was pending with new DON who just started working here 06/20/23 to assist with tracking the RN hours. She stated the DON called off one day Friday 6/23/23 she worked in the DON's place and thought that RN A worked 6/22/23 but was not sure, then the DON was off for a family emergency in July 2023 and think agency RN's worked in her place but was not sure. She stated the DON was responsible for ensuring they had RN coverage in the building and the administrator should follow-up to ensure it. She stated on 5/13/23 and 5/14/23 she was on vacation she did not work. She stated she had not done the orientation with the new DON so that they would have a better way of tracking and documenting to ensure they had RN coverages and was not sure why RN A timesheet on 06/11/23 was different from what was on the schedule sheet, then stated RN A had a mis-punch on 06/11/23 but was not able to provide a completed form with signatures from RN A and supervisor to confirm it. She stated when the RN's worked they needed to sign the schedule sheets also which was making it hard for them to determine who worked when. She stated RN A and DON had some issues with missed punches and could not provide proof they worked on certain days. She stated everyone had staffing challenges, but they figured it out and said she was getting ready to do an orientation training next week with the new DON who was going to do great here. Interview on 07/13/23 at 4:09 pm, the [NAME] President of Clinical Services stated she and the Corporate Representative reviewed the daily RN coverages to ensure there was 8 hours of RN coverage or more daily then submitted them with the other staffing data to CMS quarterly and said she was not aware of any RN coverage issues at this facility. Interview on 07/13/23 at 5:33 pm, the Administrator stated working at this facility since 12/01/22 and the facility did not have a nurse waiver. He stated he was not aware CMS had the facility listed with a one star rating because of not having enough RN hours since 10/01/22. He stated they had DON H in December 2022 until March 2023 and from March 2023 to April 2023 the facility had Acting DON D . He stated they did not have a fulltime DON from May 2023 to June 20, 2023, but the Clinical RN Specialist worked here at various times but was not sure of the actual days she worked and no documentation to confirm. He stated the facility was currently looking for a designated RN weekend supervisor to work the weekends because RN A and RN B work PRN weekends. He stated not being aware of any issues with the ADON/Staffing Coordinator not updating the schedule sheets if they changed and was not aware of any issues with her being able to keep track of the RN hours. He stated after review of RN A's timesheet dated 06/11/23 and schedule sheet 06/11/23 and was not really sure why there was inconsistencies with RN A's timesheets and schedule sheets. He stated the DON was responsible for ensuring the facility had RN coverage, the Administrator said they needed to find a better way to document on the assignment sheets for RN coverage. He stated the facility was not using RN Agency in December 2022 because the facility had RN coverage daily since he worked here and with the help of the Corporate RN's and agency staffing. He stated he had no proof the Corporate RN's worked at the facility because they were salaried and would talk to Corporate about getting the Corporate RN to sign their names on the assignment sheets. He stated the facility needed to create a better schedule sheet for better record keeping. He stated the staff were supposed to notify the ADON/Staffing Coordinator if they called off 4 hours prior to starting their shift so the ADON/Staffing Coordinator had to find the nursing coverage by first contacting the PRN RN's and if they could not work then get an agency staff and if that failed to find coverage she was supposed to call him so he could help. Interview on 07/13/23 at 6:11 pm, the Business Office Manager stated she worked here 12 years and said they have had a few DON's within the past year. She stated she was not really sure, but DON D was the acting DON from April 2023, and she stopped working here May 2023. She stated they had two RN Supervisors RN A and RN B and was not aware of any RN coverage issues and RN A worked as far as she knew was the main RN supervisor on the weekends. She stated RN B did not work too much and that they were currently looking for more RN's using the job posting board Indeed and used agency nursing staff. She stated she was not aware of any RN coverages issues from October 2022 to current. Record review of the facility's RN Position Description updated 04_2017 revealed, Job Summary: Registered nurses oversee the activities of the nursing staff. The RN is responsible for overseeing each patient's overall health and medical histories .RN's are also responsible for advanced activities such as starting intravenous infusions, administering oxygen, monitoring blood sugar levels and consulting with the supervising physicians . Record review of the facility's Staffing, Sufficient and competent Nursing policy revised 03-2023 revealed, Policy statement: Our facility provides sufficient numbers of nursing staff with the appropriate skills and competency necessary to provide nursing and related care and services for all residents in accordance with the resident care plan and the facility assessment .Sufficient Staff .A registered nurse provides services as least eight (8) consecutive hours every 24 hours, seven (7) days a week. RNs may be scheduled more than eight (8) hours depending on the acuity needs of the residents .
MINOR (C)

Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact

Staffing Data (Tag F0851)

Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on Interviews and record review the facility failed to electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staf...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on Interviews and record review the facility failed to electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information for the category of work for each person on direct care staff for 1 (facility) of 1 facility reviewed for PBJ Data submissions. The facility failed to ensure the PBJ staffing Data submitted to CMS was accurate on 05/15/23, which showed the facility had low levels of RN and DON staff hours for the 2nd quarter of the 2023 fiscal year. This failure could place residents at risk of not having adequate staffing coverage based on the facility's census which could result in inadequate care, decreased physical, mental and psycho-social well-being. The findings included: Record review of the facility's staff roster, undated indicated the facility had two RN Nurse Supervisors and one DON. Record review of the facility's 672 CMS form (Resident Census and Conditions of Residents) dated 07/13/23 revealed a census of 29 residents. Record review of the CMS PBJ Staffing Data Report ([DATE] - March 31 2023) run date 07/06/2023 revealed this facility triggered for A One star rating, No RN hours and failed to have licensing nursing coverage 24 hours/day revealed Infraction Dates: No RN hours 01/01 (SU); 01/03 (TU); 01/04 (WE); 01/05 (TH); 01/06 (FR); 01/09 (MO); 01/10 (TU); 01/11 (WE); 01/12; (TH); 01/13 (FR); 01/14 (SA); 01/15 (SU); 01/16 (MO); 01/17 (TU); 01/18 (WE); 01/19 (TH); 01/20 (FR); 01/21 (SA); 01/23 (MO); 01/24 (TU); 01/25 (WE); 01/26 (TH); 01/27 (FR); 01/30 (MO); 02/01 (WE); 02/07 (TU); 02/08 (WE); 02/09 (TH); 02/10 (FR); 02/13 (MO); 02/14 (TU); 02/15 (WE); 02/16; (TH); 02/17 (FR); 02/18 (SA); 02/19 (SU); 02/20 (MO); 02/21 (TU); 02/22 (WE); 02/23 (TH); 02/24 (FR); 02/25 (SA); 02/26 (SU); 03/01 (WE); 03/02 (TH); 03/03 (FR); 03/06 (MO); 03/07 (TU); 03/08 (WE); 03/09 (TH); 03/10 (FR); 03/11; (SA); 03/12 (SU); 03/14 (TU); 03/15 (WE); 03/16 (TH); 03/17 (FR); 03/20 (MO); 03/21 (TU); 03/22 (WE); 03/23 (TH); 03/24 (FR); 03/27 (MO); 03/28 (TU); 03/29 (WE); 03/30 (TH); 03/31 (FR) .Failed to have Licensed Nursing Coverage 24 Hours/Day 01/01 (SU); 01/03 (TU); 01/06 (FR); 01/07 (SA); 01/11 (WE); 01/14 (SA); 01/15 (SU); 01/20 (FR); 01/21; (SA); 01/25 (WE); 01/30 (MO); 02/09 (TH); 02/17 (FR); 02/18 (SA); 02/19 (SU); 02/22 (WE);03/18 (SA) . Record review of the PBJ Staffing Summary Report for 2023 2nd Quarter (01/01/23 - 03/31/23) run date 07/11/23 provided by the Administrator revealed staffing hours: One Registered Nurse Director of nursing - 45.00 hours, two Registered Nurses - 153.11 hours . Interview on 07/11/23 at 3:15 pm, the Administrator stated he was not sure who sent the PBJ reports to CMS but would find out. Interview on 07/13/23 at 2:50 pm, the Clinical RN Specialist stated this facility had a CHOW on April 1, 2023, and was not sure who did the PBJ submission reports to CMS but would find out. Interview on 07/13/23 at 4:09 pm, the [NAME] President of Clinical Services stated she was not aware of any current RN shortages and the facility had RN coverage 8 hours or more that she knew of. She stated she and the Corporate Representative were responsible for ensuring the PBJ data was submitted and accurate. She stated her and the Corporate Representative reviewed and uploaded the PBJ employee data and reviewed the daily RN coverages to ensure the facility had 8 RN hours or more of coverage then submitted the data to CMS. She stated not being aware of any issues with the accuracy of the PBJ Data submitted to CMS for the previous quarters and this facility's PBJ data was not due again until August 2023. She stated the previous owner should have submitted the PBJ reports accurately for the previous months and would have to check to see if they did. She stated she thought their Corporate Representative checked to see if the previous owner submitted the PBJ data and accurately and could not confirm because the corporate representative was currently on leave and would reach out to the previous facility owner and follow-up with the HHSC Surveyor. Interview on 07/13/23 at 5:33 pm, the Administrator stated not being aware of any issues with inaccurate PBJ data submissions which were completed at their corporate level. He stated he was not aware and not sure why this facility had a one star rating and did not have enough RN hours based on the previous PBJ reports. He provided the HHSC Surveyor the contact information for the previous owner's corporate person who did the PBJ transmissions. After review of the PBJ summary report for the 2nd quarter 2023, the Administrator stated he was not sure why the number of RN and DON hours worked were so low. Interview on 07/13/23 at 6:17 pm, Previous owner's PBJ Representative I stated she had not submitted PBJ Data submissions to CMS for this facility. Interview on 07/17/23 at 8:43 am, The [NAME] President of Clinical Services stated she had not looked at the (01/01/23 - 03/31/23) PBJ quarter and was not aware the facility currently had one star, no RN coverage and low nurse staffing ratings with CMS and was not surprised. She stated she did not have to review or validate those previous PBJ reports because of the CHOW effective 04/01/23. She stated she had no access to the previous PBJ reports until just recently. She stated when the staff hours for a quarter was 150 hours or less it triggered for one star and low staff ratings. Record review of the PBJ policy revised 3/2023 revealed, Policy: Staffing and census information will be reported electronically to CMS through the Payroll-Based Journal system in compliance with 6106 of the Affordable Care Act .9. Staffing information is collected daily and reported for each fiscal quarter .
May 2023 1 deficiency 1 Harm
SERIOUS (H) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

A resident was harmed · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on Observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for 1of 8 reside...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on Observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for 1of 8 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for Abuse. The facility failed to ensure Resident # 1 was free from Abuse, as a result Resident #1 was assaulted by Resident #2 on two different occasions and was injured. This failure placed all residents at risk for being assaulted by Resident # 2. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's face sheet reflected that he was a 62- year- old man, admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The face sheet reflected Resident # 1 had a diagnosis of Chronic Congestive heart failure (A chronic condition in which the heart doesn't pump blood as well as it should), Type 2 Diabetes with kidney complication ( a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar), Chronic Kidney disease (A loss of kidney function) , Obesity (A disorder involving excessive body fat that increases the risk of health problems), age related cataract (when the lens you're the eyes start to break down and clump together), partial traumatic amputation ( when some of the soft tissue still remains) at knee level, left lower leg. Review of Resident # 1's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE], reflected a BIMS score of 15 which indicated Resident # 1 had the cognitive ability to make his wants and needs known. Section G functional status of the MDS reflected Resident # 1 required extensive assistance with toileting, bathing, dressing and transfers. Review of Resident # 1's care plan dated 4/21/2023 reflected the following goal: Resident # 1 was at risk of loss of ROM (range of motion). Resident # 1 had the following goal: Resident # 1 will improve current level of function in ADL's. The plan had the following interventions 1. Bed mobility: Supervision x1 2. Transfer limited: Limited x1 3. Toileting: Extensive x1 4. Eating: Supervision with set up help 5. Staff assist with ROM (range of motion) daily when direct care is provided to help prevent loss Review of Resident # 2's face sheet reflected, a [AGE] year-old man, admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident # 2 had a diagnosis of Unspecified Dementia (A mental disorder in which a person loses the ability to think, remember, learn, make decisions, and sole problems) and Cognitive Communication deficit (difficulty with thinking and how someone uses language). Review of Resident # 2's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE] reflected a BIMS score of 99 which indicated the interview was not able to be completed. Section G functional status of the MDS reflected Resident #2 required extensive assistance with dressing, total dependence with bathing, eating and some assistance with walking at least 50 feet with turns. Review of Resident # 2's care plan dated 4/14/2023, focus Resident # 2 was evaluated as a wandering risk, decreased safety awareness, confusion, and wandering behavior. The care plan reflected the following goal. Resident # 2 will remain free of injuries associated with wandering behaviors. The plan had the following interventions: 1. Encourage to participate in activities of preference 2. Utilize a wander bracelet 3. Observe fore signs/symptoms of agitation, pacing, repetitive verbalizations of wanting to leave, restlessness 4. Provide re-orientation as needed 5. Check wander guard by nurse for placement and function if wander guard is removed replace or place on increased monitoring of resident's whereabouts Resident # 2care plan reflected the following focus: Resident #2 has potential to be physically aggressive/Dementia. Goal: Resident # 2 will demonstrate effective coping skills. The care plan had the following interventions: 1. Resident's triggers for physical aggression are loud noises. 2. Administer medication as ordered 3. Analyze times of day, places, circumstances, triggers 4. Provide physical and verbal cues to alleviate anxiety, give positive feedback 5. Family to provide sitters in the evenings to monitor resident 1:1 6. Monitor resident every 15 min. continuously 7. When resident becomes agitated: Intervene before agitation escalates 8. Guide from source of distress Resident # 2 care plan reflected the following focus: Resident # 2 has impaired cognitive function/dementia or impaired thought processes. Goal: To improve current level of cognitive function. The care plan has the following interventions: 1. Cue, orient, supervise as needed Record review of progress note dated 4/2/6/2023 by LVN reflected Resident # 1 was heard yelling help. The note reflected when the LVN got to Resident # 's room she found Resident # 1 hanging halfway off the right side of his bed and Resident # 2 standing at the foot of Resident # 1's bed. The LVN stated she assisted Resident # 1 back into his bed, and Resident # 1 was observed to have redness to the left side of his face. Resident # 1 stated Resident # 2 came into his room and when he asked him to leave, he started hitting him with both hands and with a closed fist. Record review of progress note dated 4/30/2023 by LPN reflected there was screaming heard coming from Resident #1's room. LPN stated someone yelled that two Resident's hitting each other. LPN stated when she arrived at Resident # 1's room she observed another staff already in the room that had Resident # 2 from behind and directed him out of Resident # 1's room. The LPN stated Resident # 1 was assessed to have a scratch to the right side of his chest next to an old surgery wound, redness to the back of the neck, his gown was torn from where Resident # 2 had pulled and grabbed Resident # 1, and he complained of pain however, did not want to go to the hospital. The note reflected Resident # 1 reported that Resident # 2 came into his room and punched him multiple times. The note reflected Resident # 1 wanted to call the police and file charges against Resident # 2. Record review of progress note dated 4/20/23 by LPN reflected Resident # 2 got behind another resident unknown in a wheelchair and gripped the back of the resident's chair. Resident # 2 was asked to let go of the resident's chair; Resident #2 became upset and gripped the chair tighter and started cursing and shaking his hand in the nurse's face. The note reflected Resident # 2 tried to hit the resident in the wheelchair. Observation on 5/15/2023 at 3:30pm, revealed Resident # 2 observed wandering the halls by the nurse's station. Resident was observed going into the nurse's station where they were working. Resident was redirected by staff at the time. Resident was not on 1:1 supervision. Resident # 2 was not able to be formally interviewed by surveyor as he did not have the cognitive ability to understand. Observation and interview conducted on 5/16/2023 at 11:00am, revealed Resident # 1's injuries. Resident # 1 had two scratches approximately 3inches long to his right leg, the skin was raised they appeared to be in the healing stage. Resident # 1 had a scratch to the center of his chest approximately 3 inches that was also in the healing stage. This scratch was on top of a previous surgery area on the chest. Resident # 1 stated the scratch to his chest hurt the most because the skin on his chest is thin from a previous surgery he had. Resident # 1 was observed with his left leg amputated. Resident # 1 reported he stayed in his room most of the time. During an interview on 5/16/2023 at 11:00am with Resident #1, revealed there was more than one incident. Resident # 1 stated 4/26/2023 was the first incident when Resident # 2 wandered into his room. He stated he told Resident # 2 to get out of his room and stated Resident # 2 started hitting him; he stated he yelled for help. Resident # 1 stated Resident # 2 almost pulled him to the ground when he was hitting him. Resident # 1 stated he spoke with the ADM and stated the ADM assured him that he would take care of the problem and would not allow the resident to come back into his room. Resident # 1 stated the next incident happened on 4/30/2023. He stated Resident # 2 wandered back into his room, and again he stated he told Resident #2 to get out of his room and Resident # 2 started hitting him again. Resident # 1 stated again he yelled for help and staff came to assist. Resident # 1 stated he has welts on his legs from where Resident # 2 was hitting him and Resident # 2 had scratched him on his arm and on his chest. Resident # 1 stated he asked that they call the police, he wanted to file charges against Resident # 2 for his injuries. Resident # 1 stated when he made his report to the police; the police spoke with the facility. Resident # 1 stated the police advised him that the facility advised of Resident # 2's diagnosis and that they would monitor him more closely. Resident # 1 stated Resident # 2 was supposed to be supervised however, he is not because he had been down his hall several times the next day with no supervision, and he doesn't want Resident # 2 hitting on him anymore. During a phone interview on 5/15/2023 at 8:42am a Facility visitor, revealed she had visited the facility on 4/30/2023 when the incident between Resident # 1 and Resident # 2 occurred. She stated she heard a resident yelling, and when she went to see what was going on she saw Resident # 2 shaking Resident #1 very aggressively. She stated she asked Resident # 2 if he would come out the room; She stated Resident # 2 grabbed Resident # 1 again and shook him she stated she called for help. The Facility visitor stated Resident # 2 would move all over the building and had caused problems with other residents, she stated she doesn't think he had the appropriate supervision. The Facility visitor stated Resident # 2 is strong and had grabbed her arm before in the past; So she knew how strong he was. Facility visitor stated Resident # 2 had gotten into with other residents and stated staff just sit behind the desk at the nurse's station. During an interview on 5/15/2023 at 11:55am with the ADON, revealed when the incident initially happened between Resident # 1 and Resident # 2, they tried to monitor Resident # 2 they did not start the 1:1 monitoring of Resident # 2 until the 2nd incident between them happened that's when Resident # 2 was placed on 1:1 supervision. ADON stated they had a care plan meeting the next day on 5/1/2023 and Resident # 2 was taken off the 1:1 monitoring the staff and family would monitor Resident # 2 movements throughout the day. Interview on 5/15/2023 at 1:30pm with LVN A, revealed Resident # 2 had a wander guard and they took turns monitoring the resident throughout the day. LVN A stated Resident # 2 was a wanderer and does wander into other resident's rooms. She stated Resident # 2 had shown aggressive behaviors when provoked by loud noises or if someone was physical with him first. Interview on 5/16/2023 at 11:30am with the other State agency worker, who revealed she had spoken with Resident # 1 earlier today and stated that he was afraid that Resident # 2 would come back in his room and start hitting him again. She stated that she advised Resident #1 that Resident # 2 was on 1:1 supervision. In an interview on 5/16/2023 at 1:15pm with CNA A, revealed she worked the day of the incident on 4/30/3034 between Resident #1 and Resident # 2. CNA A stated she worked on another hall that day and heard Resident # 1 yelling for Resident # 2 to get out of his room. She stated Resident # 2 got upset and started to swing at Resident # 1. CNA A stated Resident # 2 would often go into resident's rooms. She stated when Resident # 2 would get upset he would hit other residents and had hit staff before. CNA A stated they all tried to keep an eye on him and intervene before something happened. She stated Resident # 2 was on 15minute checks and everyone pitched in and monitored. An interview on 5/16/2023 at 1:30pm with the House- keeping staff, revealed he worked the day on the 1st incident on 4/26/2023 between Resident # 1 and Resident # 2. He stated the heard Resident # 1 screaming. He stated he proceeded to Resident # 1's along with another staff member and stated Resident # 2 was standing at the end of Resident # 1's bed, Resident #1 stated Resident # 2 was hitting and beating on him. House- keeping staff stated he walked Resident # 2 out of Resident # 1 's room and Resident # 2 was very agitated. House- keeping staff stated Resident # 2 had wandered into other resident's rooms and stated they will just tell him to get out and he will leave. An interview on 5/16/2023 at 3:30pm with the Activity Director, revealed she worked the day of the incident on 4/30/203. She stated she heard Resident #1 yelling for help and stated when she stood up she could see another staff had already approached Resident # 1's room. Activity Director stated when she made it down to Resident # 1's room she observed Resident # 1 hanging halfway off his bed almost to the floor. She stated she assisted Resident # 1 back up into his bed and stated he said, [Resident # 2] was hitting him. Activity director stated she also observed Resident # 1 left side of his face was red and Resident # 1 stated Resident # 2 had hit him in his face. A phone interview on 5/16/2023 at 4:00pm with Resident # 2's Family member revealed, that there were two incidents of physical aggression that recently took place with Resident # 2. He stated the facility provided 1:1 supervision, moved his room and adjusted his medication. Family member stated the facility asked if he could assist with the supervision but stated he was not able to assist due to his work schedule, so the facility was providing the 1:1 supervision. An interview on 5/16/2023 at 4:30pm with the DON, stated she started at facility about a week ago, she stated she expected staff would monitor all residents who are wanders to ensure their safety. She stated that she worked on a new training for staff to know what behaviors to look for and would intervene when residents get agitated before aggression occurred. The DON stated the 1:1 monitoring was the only intervention in place for Resident # 2, staff would monitor and redirect when needed. An interview on 5/16/2023 at 4:45pm with ADM, revealed it was his expectation that staff intervene during any resident-to-resident altercations. He stated staff should separate the residents and keep them safe. The ADM stated when their numbers increased, they would increase staff. He stated all staff had been trained on abuse/neglect and understand the expectation if they see or suspect abuse/ neglect. The ADM stated it is his expectation that staff would monitor any residents who wander throughout the day and try to keep them within line of sight. Record Review of policy report dated 4/30/2023, reflected the police responded to a simple assault at the facility. The report reflected that the facility would increase supervision of Resident # 2 by getting a sitter to provided 1:1 supervision throughout the day, and the facility would check to see if the wander guard alarm could be placed on the halls to alarm when he goes on certain halls of the facility. The report reflected Resident # 1 stated he just did not want Resident # 2 back him his room hitting on him. The report reflected the report was closed out due to Resident # 2's diagnosis and the facility put interventions in place. Record Review of 1:1 monitoring reflected monitoring was started on 4/26/2023 and ended on 5/1/2023. Record Review of the following in-services had been completed with staff: 5/8/2023- Interventions for Residents with agitation/behaviors 5/2/2023- 1:1 monitoring 4/27/2013- Resident # 2 behavior/agitation how to handle 4/27/2023- Resident to Resident altercation Review of QAPI - (Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement) dated Feb. 2023 - April 2023 focusing on Resident Centered culture. Record review of facility Abuse/Neglect policy dated 10/2022 stated the following: Each resident has the right to be free from abuse. Mistreatment, neglect, and corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion and financial abuse. The facility will prohibit neglect, mental or physical abuse including involuntary seclusion and the misappropriation of property or finances or residents. The facility Quality Assurance /Improvement committee will review the abuse policy to assure effectiveness
Jun 2022 8 deficiencies 1 IJ
CRITICAL (J)

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Deficiency F0692 (Tag F0692)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record reviews the facility failed to ensure that acceptable parameters of nutritional statu...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record reviews the facility failed to ensure that acceptable parameters of nutritional status were maintained for 1 of 13 residents (Resident #5) reviewed for diet orders. The facility failed to provide Resident #5 with the dietitian recommended and physician ordered diet on 05/24/2022 for the morning and noon meals. The staff indicated the resident had been receiving cereal for all three meals for about one year. The resident had a weight of 98 pounds (lbs.) in February 2022 and a current weight of 84 lbs. These failures resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation on 06/07/2022. While the IJ was removed on 06/09/2022, the facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of harm at a scope of isolated due to the need to complete in-service training and evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems. This failure could place residents with significant weight loss at risk for further weight loss and decline in health caused by malnutrition. Findings included: Review of Resident #5's face sheet dated 05/24/2022 reflected an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses of metabolic encephalopathy (is a broad category that describes abnormalities of the water, electrolytes, vitamins, and other chemicals that adversely affect brain function.), anxiety, nutritional anemia and severe protein-calorie malnutrition. Review of Resident #5's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected Resident #5 was assessed to have a BIMS score of 1, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. The resident required extensive assist with ADLs and supervision with eating. Resident #5 was assessed to have weight loss of 5% or more in the last month. Review of Resident #5's Comprehensive Care Plan reflected a problem with the start date of 04/14/2022 Resident #5 is on Terminal care with hospice. Further review of Resident #5's care plan reflected a problem dated 03/22/2022 Resident has diagnosis of severe protein-calorie nutrition with goal that resident will eat 75% of meal. Approaches included were a regular soft diet with thin liquids; add fortified foods to all meals, provide 180 ml of 2.0 house supplement three times daily, encourage oral intake of food and fluids, provide cueing and encouragement assistance for meals. Further review of Resident #5's care plan reflected a problem with ADL Functional/ Rehabilitation Potential dated 05/17/2022 , the approach indicated Resident #5 has short attention span and requires repeated cueing to eat. Review of Resident #5's Consolidated Physician orders dated 04/25/2022 through 05/25/2022 reflected the following dietary orders: -Give ice cream with lunch and supper dated 06/01/2020, -Regular mechanical soft diet with thin liquids add fortified foods to all meals dated 06/01/2020, -Double deserts with meals dated 03/19/2021, -Give 180mgl of 2.0 house supplement three times daily dated 03/19/202. Further review of Resident #5's physician orders reflected an order for hospice services dated 03/23/2022. Review of Resident #5's progress note dated 04/25/2022 by the RD indicated Summary: Res has significant weight loss of -15.2% x 193 days, res refused to be weighed last month but shows continued trend of weight loss -4.5% x 60 days, -5.2% x 95days. Resident remains on hospice care and is receiving multiple nutrition interventions to ensure resident enjoys meals. Res eats loves cheerio cereal, recommended 1. Honor resident food preferences and offer resident cheerios as alternative 2. Offer resident snacks 3. Continue ready care 2.0 180ml TID. Primary goal due to hospice care for resident to be comfortable and enjoy meals. RD will continue to monitor and follow up as needed. Observation on 05/24/2022 at 08:35 AM Resident #5 was in her room in bed. NA D was removing Resident #5's breakfast tray, the only food item on the tray was a bowl of cereal, no other food items or supplements were observed on the tray. In an interview on 05/24/2022 at 8:37 AM Resident #5 was asked if she was still hungry Resident #5 did not answer. There was no water noted at bedside. NA D was asked why Resident #5 did not had any water in her room today and NA D stated she gave her water yesterday and she gave Resident #5 milk this morning with breakfast. When asked if the milk was for the cereal she stated yes. NA D was asked if there was a reason Resident #5 could not have a pitcher of water in her room NA D stated Resident #5 spills it. Observation on 05/24/22 at 9:45 AM Resident #5 was in bed. MA K handed Resident #5 her medication which was added to her supplement (med pass 2.0 a protein supplement). Resident #5 drank all her supplement, stating repeatedly that is good. Observation on 05/24/22 at 12:05 PM Resident #5 was in her room eating in bed, the only food on the tray was a bowl of cereal. There were no supplements or other food was noted. Resident #5 was feeding herself, using the bowl to bring to her lips to eat the cereal. The only fluid on the meal tray was the milk for her cereal. In an interview on 05/25/2022 at 10:00 AM, the DM pulled Resident #5 diet card which indicated Resident #5 was to have a fortified meal plan and stated the staff told her not to put the food on her tray because she will not eat it. The DM stated if the resident had an order then the food should be on the tray. The DM stated she did not give Resident #5 the diet she had ordered because the staff told her not to. The DM stated she only gave Resident #5 cereal yesterday for breakfast and lunch. In an interview on 05/25/2022 at 10:10 AM the DON stated if the resident has a physician ordered food order it should be given to the resident as ordered. In an interview on 05/25/2022 at 10:21 AM, the RNC stated if a resident only eats cereal and was not eating the diet that was ordered it should be care planed and the physician notified. In an interview on 05/25/2022 at 10:54 AM, the RNC stated she investigated the issue with Resident #5 diet orders and stated the staff took it upon there selves to tell the kitchen not to send Resident #5 her food because they felt like she would not eat it. The RNC stated she in serviced the staff that it was not appropriate. Observation and Interview on 05/25/2022 at 11:48 AM Resident #5 was in room eating lunch. Resident #5 received her fortified food and was eating. Resident #5 stated it was good and drank all of her ice cream milk shake. Observation and Interview on 06/07/2022 PM at 1:15, Resident # 5 was in her room lying in bed. Her eyes were slightly open and stated she was sleeping. When asked what she like to eat, she stated I don't know. When asked what she had for lunch she stated, I don't remember. Resident stated she was tired and did not want to talk. Interview with LVN F on 06/07/2022 at 1:30 PM revealed Resident #5 has received only fruit loops and milk, in the past refusing other foods, which was why the resident received only fruit loops and milk on her tray. LVN F stated fruit loops are a mechanical soft diet, with no other explanation as to why dietary card was not followed or why other items were not on the tray. She stated that Resident receives multiple health shakes per day. Interview with CNA H on 06/07/2022 at 1:45 PM revealed she was familiar with Resident #5 and worked Resident #5's hallway. She was trained on ensuring the tray matched the dietary card. She stated she was aware Resident #5 only received fruit loops and milk and would often only consume fruit loops and milk three meals a day. She stated about a year ago, she noticed the dietary card did not match the meal so she took it to the kitchen and kitchen personnel told her that fruit loops and milk were the only items the resident ate so that's what she gets. She stated staff noticed last year the resident liked fruit loops and would eat them when refusing other meal items, over time fruit loops were on tray with meals and then just fruit loops with milk on tray. She stated facility staff all know resident only ate fruit loops and milk and was familiar the resident only received that on her tray. She stated she does not want to make waves so stopped notifying kitchen staff and nursing. She stated that she had not talked to any other staff regarding this situation. CNA H revealed when she entered the meal consumption percentage in the electronic health record, she based that on what was consumed from the tray, no matter if it were cereal and milk or cereal, milk, and a food item. CNA H also revealed there was no way to tell from past meal consumption records if Resident #5 received just cereal and milk or cereal, milk and other food. Interview with the DM on 06/07/2022 at 2:15 PM revealed she learned from the previous Dietary supervisor that Resident #5 only received fruit loops and milk on her tray. She stated if the kitchen was out of fruit loops and other menu items are put on Resident's tray, she will eat it. She said she knows that putting only fruit loops on the tray was not what was done for other residents, but she goes along with it so the nursing staff did not complain at her about it. She stated Resident #5 was the only resident who's diet differs from the dietary card. She stated she knows this was not accurate but it's always been done that way and has continued to do this as to not make waves. She stated the resident should have had a full meal and she didn't think it was right the resident was only getting fruit loops and milk. She stated she had no way to identify resident orders. She only finds out about orders by nurses slipping a piece of paper under the door to her office. She has requested access but was told by the Administrator that she doesn't need it. She stated she had to rely on nurses to tell her the orders and order changes . She stated she should have been looking at orders. She did not indicate whether or not she had notified her supervisors regarding her concerns. Interview with ADM on 06/07/2022 at 3:00 PM revealed the current DM was previously a cook who was promoted to the DM position after the previous one quit without notice. The ADM stated the DM had no training but was enrolled to attend training in August 2022. The ADM stated she quit working at this facility a while ago, and was recently rehired and was not aware t Resident #5 was only receiving cereal and milk. Her expectations are that residents are offered the meal on the menu with their food preferences. All dietary cards should match the food on the tray and be checked by kitchen staff before they leave the kitchen as well as by nursing staff to ensure accuracy. If trays do not match meal cards, the trays should be corrected. She stated the DM should have been given training by the previous employee but that she did not get that training. Interview with the MD on 06/07/2022 at 4:30 PM revealed he was not aware of changes to dietary orders for Resident #5 to only offer cereal and milk. The MD stated only eating fruit loops and milk could contribute to weight loss. The MD stated he was not in his office and did not have current access to Resident #5 medical file but did not think only eating fruit loops and milk would provide sufficient calories to sustain life. He stated he was not contacted regarding changing Resident #5's dietary orders and was not aware of Resident #5's refusal to be weighed. He was not able to state that malnutrition was a result of the cereal only diet. Interview with the RP for Resident #5 on 06/07/2022 at 4:45 PM revealed he was notified of weight loss but not the fact the resident was only receiving cereal and milk. He stated the resident would often refuse foods but loved sweets. He stated the facility had not discussed food options with him nor the fact that Resident #5 refused to be weighed. Observation of dinner service on 06/07/2022 at 4:58 PM revealed dietary cards did not match meal on plates. Dietary cards listed ground baked chicken and chicken gravy. Both meals had mechanically separated chicken in king ranch casserole. The meat was mechanically separated but not ground per the dietary card. Menu posted in the dining area dated 06/06/2022 revealed menu item was king ranch casserole. Resident #5 received full tray with fruit loops and milk in a separate bowl. Interview with the ADM on 06/07/2022 at 5:14 PM revealed she had no idea why both residents dietary card said baked chicken when both received king ranch casserole. She stated all Resident's dietary cards should have listed king ranch casserole. She said the baked chicken was in the casserole. She stated the facility system must have been malfunctioning and would call the facility parent company for more information and to correct the issue. Interview with ADM on 06/07/2022 at 6:00 PM revealed the DON should have been notified by nursing staff that Resident #5 was not receiving meals that matched her dietary card. She stated the DON was responsible for notifying family and physician for changes in orders, changes in condition and any other issues that occur with the resident. She stated she thought this had been done by the DON and was surprised the RP and MD were not aware of Resident #5 only receiving fruit loops and milk for some meals. Review of the facility policy Food and Nutrition Services dated 09/2021 reflected Each resident is provided with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs, taking into consideration the preferences of each resident .Food and nutrition services staff will inspect food trays to ensure that the correct meal is provided to each resident, the food appears palatable and attractive . The Administrator was notified on 6/7/2022 at 8:52 PM an IJ (Immediate Jeopardy) situation was identified due to the above failures and the IJ template was provided. On 06/09/2022 at 3:00 PM an interview with LVN C revealed she is knowledgeable of facility abuse prohibition procedures; checking Resident meal trays against meal tickets and sending back to the kitchen for correction if not matching; documenting accurate meals for each Resident with new tracking system; informing charge nurse of change in condition for residents; informing charge nurse if meal does not match meal ticket; use of supplements as ordered. On 06/09/2022 at 3:15 PM an interview with CNA H revealed she is knowledgeable of facility abuse prohibition procedures; checking Resident meal trays against meal tickets and sending back to the kitchen for correction if not matching; documenting accurate meals for each Resident with new tracking system; informing charge nurse of change in condition for residents; informing charge nurse if meal does not match meal ticket; use of supplements as ordered. On 06/09/2022 at 3:30 PM an interview with DA L revealed she is knowledgeable of facility abuse prohibition procedures; checking Resident meal trays against meal tickets and sending back to the kitchen for correction if not matching; if the trays don't match the tickets, they are to be remade. On 06/09/2022 at 3:40 PM an interview with [NAME] M revealed she is knowledgeable of facility abuse prohibition procedures; checking Resident meal trays against meal tickets and sending back to the kitchen for correction if not matching; if the trays don't match the tickets, they are to be remade. On 06/09/2022 at 4:15 PM an interview with LVN G revealed she is knowledgeable of facility abuse prohibition procedures; checking Resident meal trays against meal tickets and sending back to the kitchen for correction if not matching; documenting accurate meals for each Resident with new tracking system; informing charge nurse of change in condition for residents; informing charge nurse if meal does not match meal ticket; use of supplements as ordered. On 06/09/2022 at 4:30 PM an interview with DOR revealed she is knowledgeable of facility abuse prohibition procedures; checking Resident meal trays against meal tickets and sending back to the kitchen for correction if not matching; documenting accurate meals for each Resident with new tracking system; informing charge nurse of change in condition for residents; informing charge nurse if meal does not match meal ticket; use of supplements as ordered. On 06/09/2022 at 4:45 PM an interview with CNA K revealed she is knowledgeable of facility abuse prohibition procedures; checking Resident meal trays against meal tickets and sending back to the kitchen for correction if not matching; documenting accurate meals for each Resident with new tracking system; informing charge nurse of change in condition for residents; informing charge nurse if meal does not match meal ticket; use of supplements as ordered. The facility's plan of removal was accepted on 6/9/22 at 3:37 PM and included: Plan of Removal Please accept this Plan of Removal as a credible allegation of compliance for immediate jeopardy initiated on June 08th, 2022 for neglecting to obtain weights for residents and provide proper nutritional intervention. 27 residents had the potential to be affected by this deficient practice. 1. Action: To ensure identification of weight loss and risk for weight loss, center licensed nursing staff conducted and documented an audit of all center residents' current weight and diet orders reviewed with IDT to include registered dietician. If new weight loss is noted during weekly or monthly weights, the attending physician, registered dietician, and nursing management will be notified to obtain orders as indicated and a change of care plan will be initiated and ongoing. Actual weight loss and potential risk factors will be care planned to meet individual resident needs. The Clinical Standup & Standards of Care meeting is an ongoing meeting monitored by the Administrator and the Director of Nursing Completion Timeline: Beginning June 8th, 2022 and ending June 9th, 2022. Responsible: Administrator/DON/RNM/RD 2. Action: Nursing Administration to conduct education with licensed nursing staff regarding: 1) Notification of nursing management upon identification of resident change in weight to include. 2) Inspection and documentation of weekly weights times 4 weeks upon admission, as recommended by RD/IDT, and monthly weights for all stable residents. Beginning June 8th, 2022 licensed nurses (agency, PRN, new hires) who have not received the above stated education will be educated by Nursing Administration prior to providing resident direct care. The Clinical Standup & Standards of Care meeting is an ongoing meeting monitored by the Administrator and the Director of Nursing Completion Timeline: Beginning June 8th, 2022 and ending June 9th, 2022. Responsible: Director of Nursing and regional nurse manager 3. Action: Nursing Administration to conduct education with certified/temporary nursing assistants regarding notification of charge nurse upon identification of resident change in weight and/or meal intake percentage. Meal intake will be recorded based on the entire meal. Beginning June 8th, 2022, certified/temporary nursing assistants (agency, PRN, new hires) who have not received the above stated education will be educated by Nursing Administration prior to providing resident direct care. The Clinical Standup & Standards of Care meeting is an ongoing meeting monitored by the Administrator and the Director of Nursing Completion Timeline: Beginning June 8th, 2022 and ending June 9th, 2022. Responsible: Director of Nursing and Regional Nurse Manage 4. Nursing Administration began auditing the electronic medical record of each resident to ensure weekly/monthly weights are scheduled to be performed by a licensed nurse. The Clinical Standup & Standards of Care meeting is an ongoing meeting monitored by the Administrator and the Director of Nursing Completion Timeline: Beginning June 8th, 2022 and ending June 9th, 2022. Responsible: Director of Nursing and Regional Nurse Manager 5. Nursing Administration will conduct education with certified/temporary nursing assistants and licensed nurses regarding diet types, how to confirm with resident menu tray ticket, and for nursing staff to notify the Dietary Manager if diet does not match resident menu tray ticket. Beginning June 8th, 2022, certified/temporary nursing assistants, licensed nurses (agency, PRN, new hires) who have not received the above stated education will be educated by Nursing Administration prior to providing resident direct care. The Clinical Standup & Standards of Care meeting is an ongoing meeting monitored by the Administrator and the Director of Nursing Completion Timeline: Beginning June 8th, 2022 and ending June 9th, 2022. Responsible: Nursing Administration Administrator, Registered Dietitian, Director of Nursing 6. Nursing Administration will conduct education with Next Level Dietary Team regarding access to dietary orders in MatrixCare to compare diet orders in Next Level's Sno System, Registered Dietitian Recommendations are provided to Dietary Manager monthly by email, and dietary change communication form process is initiated on any dietary charges. Beginning June 8th 2022, Next Level Dietary Team (PRN, new hires) who have not received the above stated education will be educated by Nursing Administration prior to working in the Dietary Department. The Clinical Standup & Standards of Care meeting is an ongoing meeting monitored by the Administrator and the Director of Nursing and by RD during monthly Visits Completion Timeline: Beginning June 8th, 2022 and ending June 9th, 2022. Responsible: Director of Nursing, Next Level Area Manager and Registered Dietitian Action: Beginning on June 9, 2022 and for the Director of Nursing will utilize the Daily Clinical Meeting Process to validate charge nurse compliance with inspection, notification, and documentation of resident weights which are to be conducted upon admission and weekly and/or monthly thereafter. QAPI Committee will be notified of identified non-compliance. QAPI Committee will develop a Performance Improvement Plan to address identified non-compliance to include staff education and/or disciplinary action. These are ongoing processes to assist the Administrator and DON to manage clinical processes. Completion Timeline: Beginning June 9, 2022 and ending June 10, 2022. Responsible: Administrator, and Director of Nursing Action: Beginning on June 8th, 2022 a significant change assessment was opened Resident #5. Would only occur if another change in resident #5 medical condition Completion timeline: Opened June 8, 2022 with completion in seven days. Responsible: MDS coordinator, Director of nursing Action: Resident #5 care plan be updated to reflect interventions on June 8th, 2022, to reflect current status. Weekly IDT meeting/morning clinical meeting to include weekly weights. Weight on 6/8/22 87pounds. RD to assess additional supplements. Current supplements include fortified foods with comfort foods of the resident's choosing and supplement drink. This would on occur with another change in the resident's status. Completion timeline: Updated May 8, 2022. Responsible: MDS coordinator, Director of nursing Action: Labs to be ordered for Resident #5 on June 8th, 2022 Completion timeline: Ordered on June 8th, 2022, to be drawn June 8th, 2022. The results will be shared with the Medical Director and await any new orders Responsible: Director of Nursing, Physician Action: Change of Condition Resident #5 to be completed on June 8, 2022. Change of condition notification includes the physician. Will only occur if any change with the resident #5 medical condition Completion timeline: June 8th,2022 Responsible: Administrator, Director of Nursing. Action: Adhoc QAPI meeting with Dr [NAME] and IDT was completed at 11:15a.am. June 8, 2022. The purpose of the Ad hoc QPAI was to inform the Medical Director of the IJ Situation and to review Plan of Removal. Completion timeline: June 8th, 2022 Responsible: Administrator, Director of Nursing Action: Nursing administration to educate staff on procedure for tray card utilization and ensuring physician ordered diet is followed. Nursing staff to sign and submit tray card for all residents including Resident 5 to Director of Nursing following each mealtime 30 days. The intent is to monitor compliance with diet orders review by nursing for 30 days and kick to QAPI. If compliance is not met, monitoring of dietary orders will continue in the clinical standup and standards of care meeting. Completion timeline: June 9th,2022 Responsible: Administrator, Director of Nursing. The surveyor confirmed the facility implemented their plan of removal sufficiently to remove the IJ by: Observation of Resident #5 on 06/08/2022 11:30 AM revealed she was in dining room sitting in her wheelchair at a dining table. Resident had items matching the dietary card along with a bowl of fruit loops. Resident was observed to eat the cereal and milk with her spoon. Resident ambulated away from the table after eating several spoonsful of food. Resident was later seen ambulating in the hallway with a mug of purple liquid. Resident stated she ate dog shit for lunch. Interview with CRD on 06/08/2022 at 12:30 PM revealed she had been working with the facility since August of 2021. She stated the facility should have provided Resident #5 with a mechanical soft diet as written in the residents orders. She stated offering the resident just cereal milk was not acceptable and could lead to resident weight loss. She stated if the resident had food preferences, the facility was to provide Resident's preferences in addition to the ordered diet. She stated when residents are on hospice care the facility wanted to honor resident's food preferences and the primary goal of hospice care was to ensure the resident was comfortable but the facility must still offer meal along with alternative as preferred. She stated the resident received multiple supplements daily (180 ml of health shakes, 1680 calories and 60 grams of protein). She stated the DM should have been trained on how to change meal tickets to match the facility system and ensure the tray tickets matched the food on the resident trays. She stated she was not aware of how long the DM was without a manager to ensure proper training. She stated communication regarding the residents meal needs should be passed from nursing staff to kitchen staff, the kitchen staff ensure when trays go out for meals, and the meals match the dietary orders; and the nurses should also check trays to ensure the dietary card matches what was on the tray. She stated she was a consultant for the facility and reviewed diets and provided high risk Resident's diet recommendations once per month. She stated if she had known about Resident #5 only receiving cereal and milk, she would have spoken with the DM. She stated the DM was supposed to be following the recipes provided by facility parent company. Interview with the Clinic Manager on 06/08/2022 at 1:00 PM revealed Resident #5 was last seen by primary physician in February 2022. The Clinic manager stated the physician's note revealed the resident weighed 98 lbs. When informed of the Residents current weight of 84 lbs. she stated wow, that's pretty extreme. She stated the Hospice doctors and nurses should be ensuring Resident's care. She stated if there are current orders for Hospice, then the Resident's care falls under hospice and if no current orders are in place, care falls back to the facility medical director. Interview with DON on 06/09/2022 at 1:35 PM revealed she was not aware of the fruit loop and milk diet until the full book survey in May 2022. She stated her training was if Resident meal tray does not match the meal ticket, it was sent back to the kitchen. She stated this expectation extends to nurses and CNA's. She stated she had never observed this as she sometimes assists passing trays in the dining area. She stated this may have occurred after Resident's injury, when she was receiving meal trays in her room. She stated she could not recall how often she assisted in the dining room but assisted as needed. She stated none of the nursing staff told her Resident #5s tray sometimes was only cereal and milk. The DON said having only cereal and milk could lead to the resident not consuming enough calories and contributing to weight loss. The DON stated the kitchen staff should be getting nutritional orders from their computer system and they do not need access to Matrix. She stated she was not aware that the kitchen staff did not know how to get updates on resident orders for diets. She stated during morning meetings the kitchen staff should request knowledge of changes if they are unsure about a particular resident's diet. The DON was driving in her car during the interview and the interview ended due to the DON was having difficulty answering questions. On 06/09/2022, the Adm was informed the IJ was removed; however, the facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of harm at a scope of isolated due to the need to complete in-service training and evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to use the results of an assessment to develop, review and...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to use the results of an assessment to develop, review and revise a comprehensive care plan of each resident that included measurable objectives and timetables to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs for one of thirteen residents reviewed for care plans. (Resident #24) The facility failed to ensure Resident #24 comprehensive care plan was updated and reflected a revision of his plan of care after a significant change MDS assessment was completed on 05/04/2022 which indicated Resident #24 was placed on Hospice services. This deficient practice placed residents at risk of not having their individualized needs met in a timely manner and communicated to providers and could result in injury, a decline in physical well-being. Findings included: Review of Resident #24's face sheet dated 05/24/2022 reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with the following diagnoses Vascular dementia, Fracture of right ilium and anxiety disorder. Further review of Resident #24's face sheet reflected her payer source was hospice. Review of Resident #24's Consolidated Physician order report dated 04/23/2022 through 05/25/2022 reflected Resident #24 had an order dated 04/27/2022 admit to hospice. Review of Resident #24's Significant Change in Status MDS dated [DATE] reflected Resident #24 did not have a BIMS score conducted and was assessed to have severe cognitive impaired. Resident #24 was assessed to require dependent assist with ADLs. Further review of Resident #24's MDS reflected Resident #24 was assessed to have hospice care while a resident. Review of Resident #24's Comprehensive Care Plan reflected no plan of care for Resident #24's hospice status. Observation and interview on 05/23/2022 at 1:50 PM revealed Resident #24 in room in bed with family at bedside. Resident #24's FM stated Resident #24 had a fall at the facility and broke her pelvis. The FM stated she had no concerns about the fall but Resident #24 was not able to have surgery and Resident #24 was placed on hospice services for pain control. In an interview on 05/25/22 at 9:50 AM LVN G the MDS nurse stated she was in charge of developing comprehensive care plans after MDS assessments were completed. LVN G stated Resident #24 was on hospice. LVN G stated she did not care plan hospice for Resident #24 after doing her significant change MDS on 05/24/2022. LVN G further stated she just missed it. A policy for developing comprehensive care plans was not provided to Surveyor prior to exit on 05/25/2022.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activit...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received necessary services to maintain personal hygiene for one (Resident #5) of thirteen residents reviewed for grooming. The facility failed to provide trimming and nail care of Resident #5's fingernails which were long with a dark substance noted under her fingernails. This deficient practice placed residents who require staff assistance at risk of poor personal hygiene, a decline in their sense of well-being, level of satisfaction with life, and feeling of self-worth. Findings include: Review of Resident #5's face sheet dated 05/24/2022 reflected an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses metabolic encephalopathy (is a broad category that describes abnormalities of the water, electrolytes, vitamins, and other chemicals that adversely affect brain function.), anxiety, nutritional anemia and severe protein-calorie malnutrition. Review of Resident #5's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected Resident #5 was assessed to have a BIMS score of one indicating severe cognitive impairment. Resident was assessed to require extensive assist with ADLs and supervision with eating. Review of Resident #5's Comprehensive Care Plan reflected a problem dated 03/22/2022 ADL Functional/ Rehabilitation. Approaches included: clean and trim finger and toenails on bath/shower days. Observation on 05/24/22 at 9:45 AM Resident #5 in bed. MA K handed Resident #5 her medication which was added to her supplement (med pass 2.0 a protein supplement). Observation revealed Resident #5's fingernails were long and had a dark substance under her nails. MA K was asked who was responsible for Resident #5's nail care and she stated the CNA's. MA K agreed Resident #5's nails were long and dirty. MA K further stated Resident #5's nails should be short because she will scratch herself. In an interview on 05/25/2022 at 09:30 AM the ADON stated Resident #5's baths are done per hospice and nails should be done during bathing, but the floor CNAs are also responsible for nail care. In an interview on 05/25/22 at 09:35 AM CNA E stated Resident #5 is not combative during care and can drink water on own. CNA E stated the CNAs assigned to the hall should take care of Resident #5's fingernails and they should not be long and dirty. CNA E stated she did not know why Resident #5's nails were long and dirty, but she would take care of them. A policy on ADL assist and nail care was not provided to Surveyor prior to exit on 05/25/2022.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0679 (Tag F0679)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide an ongoing program to support residents in the...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide an ongoing program to support residents in their choice of activities, both facility-sponsored group and individual activities and independent activities, designed to meet the interest of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, encouraging both independence and interaction in the community for 1 (Resident #23) out of 13 residents reviewed for activities. The facility failed to provide activities for Resident #23 for the past four months. This failure could place residents at risk for not having activities to meet their interests or needs and a decline in their physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings included: Review of Resident #23 face sheet dated 05/24/2022 revealed Resident #23 to be a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of atrial fibrillation (an irregular, often rapid heart rate that commonly causes poor blood flow) blindness in both eyes, high blood pressure and osteoporosis (condition in which bones become weak and brittle). Review of Resident #23 quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #23 had a BIMS score of 15 which indicated intact cognition. Resident #23 required supervision and limited one person assistance for activities of daily living. Resident #23 required total assistance in mobility about the facility due to blindness. Review of Resident #23 Care Plan dated 05/23/2022 revealed Resident #23 did not have a care plan for activities. Resident #23 noted to have impaired vision related to blindness in bilateral eyes with a long-term goal of remaining physically safe and participating in social and self-care activities. Interventions included: -Assure the floor is free of glare, liquids and foreign objects -Keep call light in reach at times. -Orient Resident #23 when there had been new furniture placement or other changes in environment. -Provide Resident #23 an environment free of clutter. In an observation and interview on 05/24/2022 at 4:00 PM Resident #23 stated she has lived here since January and has been blind for almost 3 years. Resident #23 was observed sitting on the side of her bed and faced the door to her room with her tray table placed in front of her. Observation of a sign on the door to her room and above her bed read visually impaired resident - please knock and announce presence when entering the room. She stated she was still getting used to be being blind. She said she liked to eat in her room because she went one time to the dining room and had a pleasant time and then the man, she was eating with found out she was blind and would not eat with her again. When asked about leaving her room for social interaction and activity, she said she went to physical therapy Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays and went to listen to music on Tuesday and Thursdays. She said she went to church service on Sunday at the facility. She said there were no other activities offered that she could do due to her blindness. She said she could not participate in bingo or other games. She said sometimes someone will walk her outside and sit with her, but you must have a staff member to sit with you to go outside. She said she would like to go outside more, and her family will take her outside when they visit. She stated otherwise she stayed in her room by herself and the activity director did visit her a couple times per month. In an interview on 05/24/2022 at 2:18 PM REG RN stated after reviewing the care plan there was no care plannedactivities on Resident #23's care plan. She said activities should have been on the care plan. She stated every resident should have activities on their care plan. She stated the activity director kept written log of who attended which activities and what their preferences were for activities. In an interview on 05/24/2022 at 2:25 PM, DON s tated there were multiple activities for Resident #23 but did not know which activities she attended. She stated Resident #23 did stay in her room mainly and required assistance to navigate the facility. When asked which activities were offered for visually impaired residents, she said there were multiple activities they could participate in like music and exercise. She did not know whether Resident #23 attended these activities. She said the ACT DIR was responsible for the completion of activity assessment and updating the nurse in charge of completion of MDS assessments and care plans. She said she did not know why activities was not on Resident #23's care plan. In an interview on 05/24/2022 at 3:00 PM, ACT DIR stated she did not keep a written log of activities but took attendance at each activity and then documented in the resident's electronic medical record they attended the activity. She stated the records for Resident #23's activity attendance would be in her electronic medical record. She stated Resident #23 liked to go listen to music and church on Sunday. She stated she also did room visits with Resident #23. She said she completed activity assessments and the nurse in charge of MDS assessments and care plans updated the resident care plans. She said she frequently checks in with residents regarding their activity choices and if they requested a different or better activity for them, she would try to make the suggestion happen within reasonable limits. In an interview on 05/25/2022 at 9:45 AM ADMIN said activities at the facility included bingo, dominoes, games. When asked about activities for blind residents, she stated Resident #23 attended music and church. She stated the activity director and she spend time talking to her and completed in-room activities. She said Resident #23 liked to stay in her room and said they did try to take her outside when able to do so. She said they had offered to take her to other activities, and she refused. When asked if the activities she refused to attend were for visually impaired residents, she said no. When asked if someone would help her play bingo, she said no the facility had not attempted to assist residents during activities that required being able to see. In a follow-up interview on 05/25/2022 at 2:30 PM, ACT DIR stated she found her attendance logs. When asked about documentation for Resident #23's activities she said there was not any in her electronic medical record because it was not in the assigned tasks for documentation because it was not on her care plan for activities . She stated when activity was added to the care plan it generated the task in the EMR for documentation. She said she did not have Resident #23 on the attendance logs either. She stated she would need to find additional activities for Resident #23 that would allow for more social interaction and activities. She stated activities was added to Resident #23's care plan yesterday. She said she did not have the documentation of room visits with Resident #23 and said she visited her weekly in her room. There were no observations of Resident #23 outside of her room or that she was engaged in activities between the dates of 05/23/2022 - 05/25/2022. Review of Activities Calendar dated May 2022 revealed the following activities: 05/23/2022 - 9:00 AM Room visits 10:00 AM Chair Zumba 11:00 AM Yahtzee 05/24/2022 - 9:00 AM Room visits 10:00 AM Resident Council Meeting with state 11:00 AM Work with Our [NAME] Lutheran 05/25/2022- 9:00 AM Room visits 10:00 AM Bingo 11:00 AM Uno Review of Resident #23 Electronic Medical Record dated 01/13/2022 - 05/24/2022 did not reveal documentation related to activities. Review of Group Programs and Activities Calendar Policy dated April 2009 revealed group activities are available in this facility and an activities calendar is completed to inform residents, families and staff of the activity opportunities available. Residents are encouraged to participate in all group activities, especially those that are best suited for their interests and physical, mental, and emotional needs. Review of Individual Activities and Room Visit Program dated August 2006 revealed individual activities will be provided for those residents whose situation or condition prevents participation in other types of activities, and for those residents who do not wish to attend group activities. The policy further revealed the activities offered are reflective of the resident's individual activity interests, as identified in the Activity Assessment, progress notes and the residents comprehensive care plan. It is recommended that residents on a full room visit program receive at a minimum three room visits per week with an average of 10-15 minutes in length. Review of Activities Attendance Policy dated November 2021 revealed the activity department records activities attendance and participation of all residents. Attendance and participation was recorded for every resident in group and individual activities on a daily basis. Review of Activities Documentation Policy dated January 2020 revealed the activity director/coordinator was responsible for maintaining appropriate departmental documentation to include for each resident activity evaluation, attendance records, activities calendar, activity progress notes and individualized activities care plan.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Laboratory Services (Tag F0770)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide or obtain timely laboratory services to meet the needs of 1...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide or obtain timely laboratory services to meet the needs of 1 (Resident #10) of 3 residents reviewed for ordered laboratory services in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #10's complete metabolic panel laboratory order was completed per physician order in a timely manner. This deficient practice could place residents at risk for a delay in identifying or diagnosing a problem, adjusting medications, and ensuring treatment needs were identified and addressed. Findings included: Review of Resident #10 face sheet dated 05/25/2022 revealed Resident #10 to be a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of history of stroke with speech and language deficits, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), aphasia (inability to comprehend or formulate language), and apraxia (motor disorder caused by damage to the brain which causes difficulty with motor planning to perform tasks or movements). Review of Resident #10 Annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #10 to have unclear speech and was sometimes understood and usually understood others. Resident #10 was unable to complete the BIMS evaluation and the Staff Assessment for Mental Status revealed Resident #10 had a memory problem, but could remember her room location, staff names and faces and that she was in a nursing home. Resident #10 required total assistance with two people for activities of daily living. Review of Resident #10 Care Plan dated 03/22/2022 Resident #10 had a potential for complications related to diuretic medication usage with a goal of not exhibiting signs of side effects of complications secondary to diuretic use through next review date. Interventions included: -Administer diuretic Laxis 80 mg twice daily. -Monitor blood pressure every shift. -Monitor cardiovascular system and fluid status to determine effectiveness of diuretic therapy. -Monitor labs as ordered. -Obtain weight monthly and as needed. -Report signs and symptoms of low potassium levels. -Report signs of dehydration. Review of Resident #10 Pharmaceutical Review dated 03/24/22 revealed Resident #10 to have the following recommendation This resident is receiving Lasix without current lab work on the chart. Please consider ordering a BMP on the next lab day and repeat every 6-12 months to monitor therapy. Review of Resident #10 Physician orders dated 04/05/2022 revealed Resident #10 to have an order for a basic metabolic panel of labs. Review of Resident #10 Pharmaceutical Review dated 04/22/2022 Resident #10 recommended This resident is receiving Lasix without current lab work on the chart. Please consider ordering a BMP on the next lab day and repeat every 6-12 months to monitor therapy. Review of Resident #10 Lab Report dated 05/20/2022 revealed Resident #10 to have a complete metabolic lab panel resulted from lab draw completed on 05/20/2022. In an interview on 05/25/2022 at 1:45 PM the DON said labs for Resident #10 should have been completed within the week the physician ordered it and not a month and a half later. She said it was deficient practice to not immediately follow-up on the recommendation from the pharmacist review, obtain a physician order and complete the recommended lab draw. She said the pharmaceutical review should be sent within two days of receiving the report to the physician and then the changes or orders complete when received from the physician. She stated she was in charge of completing the pharmaceutical review follow-up and would ensure timely review and completion of recommendations. She said she started at the facility in April 2022 and the staff had not been monitoring the pharmacist review closely and she only recently realized the deficient practice. Review of Pharmacy Services - Role of the Consultant Pharmacist Policy dated April 2007 revealed the Consultant Pharmacist shall provide consultation on all aspects of pharmacy services in the facility to include helping to identify and evaluate medication-related issues. Review of Laboratory Guidelines Policy (undated) revealed lab work is ordered by physician for all medications that justify lab work for dosage scrutiny. Labs will be drawn per physician orders and routine labs will be drawn on routine lab visits.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0807 (Tag F0807)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident received and the facility provided...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident received and the facility provided drinks, including water and other liquids consistent with resident needs and preferences for one of thirteen residents reviewed for hydration. (Resident #5). The facility failed to ensure Resident #5 had fresh ice water available and in reach. This failure could lead to dehydration, urinary tract infections, and falls. Findings included: Review of Resident #5's face sheet dated 05/24/2022 reflected an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses metabolic encephalopathy (is a broad category that describes abnormalities of the water, electrolytes, vitamins, and other chemicals that adversely affect brain function.), anxiety, nutritional anemia and severe protein-calorie malnutrition. Review of Resident #5's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected Resident #5 was assessed to have a BIMS score of one indicating severe cognitive impairment. Resident was assessed to require extensive assist with ADLs and supervision with eating. Resident #5 was assessed to not have a swallowing disorder. Review of Resident #5's Consolidated Physician orders dated 04/25/2022 through 05/25/2022 reflected the following dietary orders give ice cream with lunch and supper dated 06/01/2020, Regular mechanical soft diet with thin liquids add fortified foods to all meals dated 06/01/2020, double deserts with meals dated 03/19/2021, Give 180mgl of 2.0 house supplement three times daily dated 03/19/202. Further review of Resident #5's physician orders reflected an order for hospice services dated 03/23/2022. Review of Resident #5's Comprehensive Care Plan reflected a problem dated 03/22/2022 Dehydration/ Fluid Maintenance, Resident #5 is at risk for dehydration related to recent decline and malnutrition, approaches included assist with fluids as needed, encourage fluids to 1500 cc/day offer a variety of fluids .Keep fluids accessible . Observation and interview on 05/23/2022 at 1:00 PM revealed Resident #5 in her room in bed. Resident #5 was in a low bed with a matt on the floor. Further observation revealed no water pitcher or fluids in room. Resident #5 skin and lips were dry. Resident #5 was asked if she was thirsty, she stated yes, she wanted some water. Observation on 05/23/2022 at 3:51 PM revealed Resident #5 in her room in bed and there was no water pitcher or fluids in the room. Observation on 05/24/2022 at 08:35 AM Resident #5 in room in bed. NA D was removing Resident #5's breakfast tray. Observation revealed the only food items on the tray was a bowl of cereal, no other food items, fluids, or supplements. In an interview on 05/24/2022 at 8:37 AM Resident #5 was asked if she was still hungry Resident #5 did not answer. No water was noted at bedside. NA D was asked why Resident #5 did not had any water in her room today or yesterday and NA D stated she gave her water yesterday and she gave Resident #5 milk this morning with breakfast. When asked if the milk was for the cereal she stated yes. NA D was asked if there was a reason Resident #5 could not have a pitcher of water in her room NA D stated Resident #5 spills it. Observation on 05/24/22 at 9:45 AM Resident #5 in bed. MA K handed Resident #5 her medication which was added to her supplement (med pass 2.0 a protein supplement). Resident #5 drank all her supplement, stating repeatedly that is good. Observation on 05/24/22 at 12:05 PM Resident #5 in room eating in bed only food on tray was a bowl of cereal. Resident #5 was feeding herself, using the bowl to bring to lips to eat the cereal. The only fluid on the meal tray was the milk for her cereal. In an interview on 05/25/2022 at 09:35 AM CNA E stated Resident #5 is not combative during care and can drink water on own. CNA E stated Resident #5's water should be close to her encase she wants to drink. In an interview on 05/25/2022 at 10:10 AM the DON stated all residents should always have fresh water available to them if allowed by physician orders. Observation on 05/25/2022 at 11:48 AM Resident #5 in room eating lunch stated it was good and drank all her ice cream milk shake. In an interview on 05/25/22 at 10:54 AM the RNC stated all residents should always have fluids within reach. Review of the facility's policy Hydration-Clinical Protocol dated 09/2017 reflected The physician and staff will help define the individual's current hydration status .will identify and repot signs and symptoms that might reflect existing fluid and electrolyte imbalance . The facility policy did not address providing fluids to residents.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0849 (Tag F0849)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record reviews the facility failed to ensure the hospice services met the professional standards and prin...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record reviews the facility failed to ensure the hospice services met the professional standards and principles that apply to individuals providing timely services in the facility for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #5) reviewed for hospice services in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #5 was seen weekly by a hospice RN per Resident #5's hospice plan of care. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #5 was seen three times per week by a hospice Aide per Resident #5's hospice plan of care. These failures could place residents receiving hospice services at risk of not having their health needs met causing a decline in health. Findings Included: Review of Resident #5's face sheet dated 05/24/2022 reflected an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of metabolic encephalopathy (is a broad category that describes abnormalities of the water, electrolytes, vitamins, and other chemicals that adversely affect brain function.), anxiety, nutritional anemia and severe protein-calorie malnutrition. Review of Resident #5's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected Resident #5 was had a BIMS score of one indicating severe cognitive impairment. The resident required extensive assist with ADLs and supervision with eating. Resident #5 was assessed to have weight loss of 5% or more in the last month. Review of Resident #5's Comprehensive Care Plan reflected a problem with the start date of 04/14/2022 Resident #5 is on Terminal care with hospice. Review of Resident #5's Hospice Care Plan dated 12/31/2021 revealed skilled nursing visits, Nurse Practitioner visits two times per week for 12 weeks and Nurse Aide visits three times per week for 13 weeks (03/27/2022 to 06/21/2022). Review of facility's hospice binder for Resident #5 revealed Resident #5 received Registered Nurse visits on 04/04/2022, 04/11/2022, 04/19/2022, 04/27/2022 and 05/01/2022. Resident #5 received Nurse Aide visits on 03/27/2022 and 05/21/2022. Interview with hospice Nurse Aide on 06/08/2022 at 1:30 PM revealed she assisted Resident #5 once per week. She stated she was at the facility on 06/04/22 and 05/27/22. She stated lived extremely far from the facility and she was not able to see the resident more than one time per week, despite Resident's current hospice orders. She stated when she came to the facility she signed in the hospice binder. She was not aware of the consequences to Resident if she did not come to the facility to see the resident more than once per week. She stated that facility staff would take care of the resident's needs if hospice Aide was not available. Interview with hospice Registered Nurse on 06/08/2022 at 2:00 PM revealed she did not see Resident #5 any longer. She stated RN was listed as the resident's nurse with last documentation of visit on 05/02/2022. She stated the resident was supposed to be seen by an RN once per week according to her current hospice order. She stated the facility nurses should have noticed the RN was not coming to see Resident #5 and notified the DON. She stated it was absolutely unacceptable that the facility did not notice the resident was not being seen to by hospice. She stated the minimum that a hospice nurse comes to a facility to see Residents in Hospice care was every two weeks. She stated that the residents not being seen by Hospice nurses as ordered could lead to a decline or change of condition. Interview with LVN C on 06/08/2022 at 4:00 PM revealed she did not know how often hospice nurses needed to come and see residents on hospice for care. She was not familiar with Resident #5's hospice plan and was did not mention the hospice logbook located at the nursing station. Interview with Registered Licensed Nurse on 06/08/2022 at 4:15 PM revealed RN visits for residents are based on the residents care plan and had no further information regarding how often residents on hospice should be seen by Hospice Nurses or the responsibilities of facility to ensure residents were seen by hospice nurses. Interview with CNA K on 06/08/2022 at 4:30 PM revealed the hospice RN's should visit residents once per week and aides 5 times per week. She stated this was logged in the resident's hospice book kept at the nursing station which was supposed to be checked by the DON. She said she wasn't sure if the DON was checking this documentation. She stated that lack of sufficient visits to the resident from Hospice Nurses and Aides could result in Resident not receiving needed services for necessary care. Interview with ADMIN on 06/09/2022 at 12:00 PM revealed she was not aware of Resident #5's Hospice care plan dated 12/31/2021. She said she was not aware Resident #5 was to receive weekly visits from an RN and tri weekly visits from the Aides. She stated she was going to contact the Hospice contracting company to determine why this was not happening. She stated the DON was responsible for ensuring that weekly visits were being tracked to ensure the resident was getting needed services. She stated she thought the DON was ensuring Resident #5 received all visits in resident's hospice care plan. Interview with DON on 06/09/2022 at 1:35 PM revealed when a resident was on hospice care, an RN should visit weekly and the hospice aides five times per week. She stated there was a binder for each Resident and the hospice Resident, and she has told the nursing staff on duty as well as the hospice agency partners that nursing staff should ensure hospice signs logbook when entering the facility and hospice must document in the binder Resident notes. When asked how she ensured that hospice RNs are coming to see Resident weekly, she stated its hospice's responsibility to ensure weekly RN visits. She stated she has not checked to ensure that the hospice RN and aides were coming to see Residents for care and was not aware Hospice was not coming per their care plan. She was not aware of what might happen if Resident was not getting care from hospice as ordered. She stated the facility would provide necessary care if hospice did not come. Review of facility's Hospice and Nursing Facility Services Agreement (no date) revealed the Nursing Facility shall provide hospice patients served in the community all necessary respite services, as outlined in the hospice plan of care specifically to maintain the hospice plan of care while the patient's caregiver is provided relief. Nursing facility shall ensure that such respite services are provided in accordance with the hospice POC, are ordered and prescribed by the applicable attending physician, and are rendered as specifically authorized by hospice.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Abuse Prevention Policies (Tag F0607)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their written policies and procedures that prohibit and ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse and neglect of residents for four of thirteen residents (Resident #25, Resident #14, Resident #16, and Resident #18) reviewed for abuse and neglect. A) The facility failed to implement a policy and process for immediately investigating and reporting allegations of abuse and neglect to HHSC for allegations of alleged physical abuse for Resident #25. B) The facility failed to implement their policy and process for immediately investigating and reporting allegations of abuse and neglect to HHSC for allegations of witnessed Resident to Resident physical abuse between Resident's #14 & #16 on 05/17/2022. C) The facility failed to implement their policy and process for immediately investigating and reporting allegations of abuse and neglect to HHSC when an injury of unknown origin was identified to Resident #18's left eye on 04/26/2022. This deficient practice could place residents at risk for abuse. Findings included: Review of the facility's Abuse Prevention Program dated June 2021 revealed the administrator is responsible for the overall coordination and implementation of our Center's abuse prevention program policies and procedures. To aid in abuse prevention, all personnel are to report any signs and symptoms of abuse/neglect to their supervisor and to the Abuse Prevention Coordinator immediately. All reports of resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property, mistreatment and/or injuries of unknown source (abuse) shall be promptly reported to local, state and federal agencies (as defined by current regulations) and thoroughly investigated by Center management. Findings of abuse investigations will also be reported. A) In an interview on 05/23/22 at 12:40 PM COOK A stated on 04/22/2022 she saw CNA J pulling Resident #25 by his shirt in the dining and she ran over to tell her you're choking him. She said Resident #25 had broccoli in his mouth and was swatting at CNA J to let go of his shirt while his face turned red, and it seemed like he could not breathe. She said CNA J said she was trying to keep Resident #25 from falling. She said to CNA J you were choking him and CNA J said she was not. She said CNA J should have had Resident #25 wheelchair leaned further back and he would not have been able to lean forward and almost fall out of his chair. She said they went on working and then CNA J came back to her later in that day and said, just to let you know I wasn't choking him. She said she reported the incident to the charge nurse and had not heard anything more about it. She said she wrote up a statement the next day and gave it to DM. She said CNA J continued to work at the facility until she resigned about two weeks ago. She said on 05/17/2022 the regional nurse consultant was at the facility and she asked her about whether anyone looked into the incident. She said REG RN said she had not heard anything about the incident. She said she was asked to write another statement and she did. She said she left the facility for the day at the end of her shift on 05/17/2022. She said DM called her at home and said she was not allowed to return to the building and that she had a choice to either resign or transfer to another building for making false allegations. She said ADMIN said she was making false allegations. She said this was her first day back at work because someone at the corporate office called her and after she explained what happened she was asked to return to work at the facility. She said she and the food service workers were employed by two separate companies. She said the facility contracts for food service with her company. She said for abuse/neglect reporting she was instructed to report to ADMIN. She said for human resource issues her boss was REG DIR. She said she did not understand why she was suspended and not allowed to return to work for reporting abuse. She said she did what was required and felt retaliated on by ADMIN. She said the dietary aide DA K witnessed the incident too and no one has ever spoken to her. She said she did not think Resident #25 had any injuries from the choking incident but was not sure if any investigation was completed by the facility. She said she did not think an investigation was done at all. She said she received training on abuse and neglect training on reporting abuse and neglect to the administrator and what counts as abuse and neglect. In an interview on 05/23/22 at 12:55 PM DM said COOK A was a cook and her mom. She said COOK A told her on 04/23/2022 what happened between Resident #25 and CNA J. She said COOK A wrote a statement and gave it to her. She said she was not aware of any investigation into the incident. She said they were to report any concerns of abuse/neglect to ADMIN. She said her mom told her she told the charge nurse about the incident the night before because ADMIN was not in the building the evening of 04/22/2022. She said on 05/17/2022 her mom had left at the end of her shift and her boss REG DIR told her to call COOK A and tell her she was not allowed to return to the building. She said REG DIR told her to tell her mom she could transfer to another building or resign for making false allegations. She said she quit and did not return the next day to work because of how unfair management was being towards them. She said she felt like they were retaliating on COOK A for making a report of abuse. She said she received training on identifying abuse and neglect and that she must report any concerns of abuse or neglect to the administrator. In an interview 05/23/22 at 1:03 PM DA K said she and COOK A were walking back to the dining room after walking residents to the front room for TV on 04/22/2022. She said CNA J was wheeling Resident #25 in his wheelchair and he leaned forward, and CNA J grabbed him by the back collar of his t-shirt and was choking him with his t-shirt. CNA J said she was keeping him from falling. She said CNA J should have leaned Resident #25's chair back to keep him from falling, not choked him with his t-shirt. She said she was not contacted to give her statement or asked what happened back in April 2022 or in the last week. She said Resident #25 told CMA M about it the next day. She said normally Resident #25 was belted in his wheelchair but wasn't that day maybe? She was not sure. She said if CNA J had leaned him back in wheelchair, he would not have been falling and she would not have had to choke him with his t-shirt. She said she received training on abuse reporting and prevention and to report any concerns to ADMIN. In an interview on 05/23/2022 at 1:13 PM CMA M said she arrived to work on 04/23/2022 and was told by COOK A that CNA J had choked Resident #25. She said COOK A told her to go ask Resident #25 about it. She said she asked Resident #25 about it and he replied to her she grabbed my shirt and then went to a party. She said Resident #25 was not very with it and did not say anyone choked him. She said she observed no injuries on him. She said she was not sure if the facility completed an investigation. She said if she thought a resident was being abused, she would report it to the charge nurse, and to the administrator the abuse coordinator. She said she questioned COOK A's allegations because she did not immediately report the incident from what she heard from other staff. She said she was not working the day of the incident. She said she did not know if COOK A reported it to the charge nurse the same day and the charge nurse was no longer working at the facility. In an interview on 05/23/22 at 1:23 PM, DON stated she started at this facility on 04/11/2022. She said she called up to the facility to check on something else on 04/23/2022 and the staff member that answered the telephone, she could not remember their name, told her have you heard kitchen staff said CNA J was choking a resident. She said she immediately ended the call and called ADMIN at home. She said it was the weekend and neither of them were working. She said she told ADMIN they needed to investigate it. She said ADMIN said she would call the facility. She said ADMIN called her back and said she spoke with the staff at the facility, COOK A and CNA J. She said ADMIN said she confronted COOK A and told DON the incident didn't happen. She said ADMIN told her the COOK A supposedly reported it to the charge nurse on 04/22/2022 and ADMIN questioned her (the charge nurse) and the charge nurse said it didn't happen. She said the next week after 04/23/22, she asked ADMIN about it again and ADMIN told her she fully investigated it and it didn't happen. DON said she completed an abuse/neglect inservice with the staff. She said COOK A gave her a note with the allegation at some point during the week and she asked ADMIN about the allegations again and again. ADMIN said it didn't happen and it had been fully investigated. She said ADMIN kept insisting that COOK A was lying. She said she checked on Resident #25 and he was okay and had no physical injuries. She said there was family drama between COOK A, ADMIN and DM. She said she had not seen or read any documentation or witness statements that documented the investigation by ADMIN. She said it was not reported to HHSC until last week. She said ADMIN told her again it was fully investigated and unconfirmed. She said CNA J the aide quit and was not terminated. She said she was not aware of any performance issues by CNA J before she quit. She said last week when the RNC was visiting, she went to check on something and returned to find DM and COOK A speaking with the RNC in her office. She said COOK A and DM were complaining of personal issues with ADMIN and reported the choking to RNC. She said the RNC called ADMIN and said you have to report this to HHSC. She said she overheard as they were feeding residents at dinner on 05/17/2022 that the kitchen staff were told they had to transfer or resign for making the allegations. She said she was not part of those conversations or decisions. She said ADMIN did confirm with CNA J at some point that the incident happened, and it was as a result of CNA J not tilting the wheelchair back as she reversed the wheelchair and Resident #25 was able to lean forward and almost fall out of his chair. She said CNA J stated she did grab Resident #25 by the back of the shirt collar to keep him from falling. She said CNA J said she was not choking him. DON said Resident #25 did not have a wheelchair seat belt . She said at some point before CNA J quit, they did do training with CNA J to teach her how to reverse the wheelchair so Resident #25 could not lean forward. She said there was no documentation in progress notes or otherwise of the incident until 05/17/22. She said she had not heard of DA witnessing the incident or spoken to DA K about it. In an observation and interview on 05/23/2022, Resident #25 was clean, well-groomed, and appropriately dressed while sitting in his bed. He did not have any marks or bruises to indicate abuse. When asked about his care and treatment at the facility, he did not respond. When asked about whether he felt safe, he said yes. In an interview on 05/23/22 at 2:07 PM, the RNC stated she was visiting the facility to assist DON with training when DM and COOK A started to complain to her about ADMIN. She stated they told her about the choking incident with Resident #25. She said this was the first time she heard about it. She said ADMIN was not at work that day on 05/17/2022. She said she called her at home and told her she needed to report it to HHSC. She said ADMIN said it was not reported as abuse but as a near fall, so she did not report it. She said ADMIN said she investigated it and found it not to be abuse. She said she told ADMIN that if someone has the perception of abuse and reports an abuse allegation, ADMIN had to report it. She said she did not see any documentation for an investigation, but ADMIN's office was locked, and she was not at work that day. She said did not think ADMIN was ignoring abuse because she said she thought it was not willful abuse, but an accident because the aide grabbed his shirt to keep him from falling. She said she did not know anything about COOK A being accused of making false allegations and being suspended. She said they would not allow retaliation for allegations of abuse. In an interview on 05/23/2022 at 2:43 PM ADMIN said she first heard about the choking incident from CNA K on 04/24/22. She said she called COOK A immediately and told her she should have reported it immediately. She CMA M told her CNA J choked Resident #25. ADMIN said she tried to call CNA J that day too but was unable to reach her. She said she spoke with COOK A who reported the whole story. She said they did an Inservice with all staff on 04/27/2022 on abuse and neglect. She said after speaking with all of the witnesses and CNA J she could confirm there was not abuse. ADMIN said she did not have documentation of the interviews or other documentation of the investigation as required by their facility policy. She did not report to HHSC because it was not confirmed abuse. ADMIN said when CMA M told her the ADMIN she said, I knew it was a lie. She said back when the foodservice company wanted to hire COOK A and DM to work at the facility, she did not want them hired because they are family members. She stated COOK A and DM like to start drama and cause problems. She said her aides have to walk on eggshells around them because they are afraid of being accused of abuse. She said she did not interview DA K because she was not aware that she was a witness. ADMIN said they just did an inservice and took no other steps in the investigation. ADMIN said CNA J did tell her that she (CNA J) did pull Resident #25's t-shirt to keep him from falling as COOK A said. It was not done with willful intent to abuse. She said then last week the RNC called her at home because her baby was sick and told her she needed to report it immediately because it alleged abuse. She said last Tuesday 05/17/2022 she called DM and COOK A's boss on 05/17/2022 and said she wanted them out of her building. ADMIN said her boss and DM's boss spoke and she was not sure what DM's boss relayed to them. She said she wanted them suspended for violating HIPAA because they told family members who did not work at the facility about the incident. She said she did not suspend DM or COOK last Tuesday 05/17/2022. She said CNA J quit on 05/11/2022 due to hostile work environment and being harassed by DM and COOK A over the situation. She said DM and COOK A were asked to return to the facility today by their bosses. She said the REG DIR was coming tomorrow to sign an agreement with them about their unprofessional behavior. She said she had not spoken with the charge nurse that COOK A reported the initial incident to because she was a travel nurse for their corporation and had not returned to work at the facility. She said did not know if COOK A reported the incident to the charge nurse that day on 05/22/2022. She said she did not know why COOK A would have wanted to get CNA J in trouble. She said she felt like DM and COOK A were out to get her because DM was written up after ADMIN reported to DM's boss that she was seen cursing in front of residents a couple of months ago. In an interview on 05/23/2022 at 3:12 PM, REG DIR for [Contract Food Service Company] stated she was contacted by ADMIN on 05/17/2022 regarding the allegations. She said she spoke with COOK A who reported she turned in a statement on 04/23/2022 to the DM regarding the incident. She said ADMIN said she spoke with people and got statements. She said ADMIN's boss and her boss spoke later in the day on 05/17/2022 and ADMIN's boss told her boss they would like COOK A removed from the building due to COOK A making false allegations. She said she informed DM of the need for COOK A to be moved to a different building or resign and DM resigned. She said she felt like ADMIN retaliated on COOK A and DM because she did not do her job when the original allegation was reported back in April 2022 and now ADMIN was in trouble for not investigating the allegation. She said ADMIN told her during the phone on 05/17/2022 that the incident did not occur and there was no abuse. She said it was later confirmed the incident did occur and CNA J did grab Resident #25's shirt to keep him from falling. She said the dietary staff were required to report concerns of abuse to the abuse coordinator at the building, not her. She said she did not speak with DA K regarding the incident. She stated after completing their investigation on their side for their company, they asked DM and COOK A to return to work because there was no false allegation. She said she would be coming to the building tomorrow to speak with DM and COOK A. In an interview on 05/24/2022 at 8:25 AM DM stated she and COOK A were upset because their boss REG DIR was on her way to write them up. She stated she did not understand why they were being punished for reporting the allegations of abuse. She stated she felt like they were being retaliated against for reporting and then when nothing was done, reporting higher up the chain of command. In an interview on 05/24/2022 at 9:05 AM the REG RN stated when asked why would an Inservice done by DON on 04/27/2022 be completed with all staff regarding the incident with Resident #25 if it was not an abuse allegation, she stated the ADMIN knew it was an abuse allegation regarding the incident on 04/22/2022. She stated that was not the impression she was given and apologized for the misunderstanding. She said she was under the impression the incident of the resident being choked with t-shirt by CNA J was an accident to keep him from falling and no abuse was alleged. She stated ADMIN should have completed a full investigation per their policy and had the required documentation as well as reporting the allegation to HHSC. She stated she was not aware the food service REG DIR was on her way to write up the kitchen staff for the false allegations. She stated she understood that could have the appearance of retaliation from the facility for the reporting and would ensure there was no disciplinary action for the kitchen staff. In an interview on 05/25/2022 at 4:10 PM REG DIR stated there was no disciplinary action for COOK A and DM. She stated she did complete an inservice regarding professional behavior but did not write them up. When asked if there would be any changes for dietary staff to report abuse or neglect,she said they did not have any changes for them to report future concerns of abuse/neglect. She said they could grab a witness or something if reporting an allegation to ADMIN. She said they would still report concerns to ADMIN, the abuse coordinator. In an interview on 05/25/2022 at 8:10 AM the REG RN said they established an alternate abuse coordinator for the facility and it's the DON. Kitchen staff stated they feel comfortable reporting to her (DON) in the future. She stated her contact information, and the regional vice president's contact information of the nursing facility will also be on all abuse/neglect reporting signs if a person had a concern that they felt was not being handled appropriately. Review of CNA J Written Statement dated 05/20/2022 revealed CNA J emailed her written statement to ADMIN and it read After dinner on April 22nd I was pushing [Resident #25] in his wheelchair from the dining room. As I was approaching the nurse's station, he dropped his feet causing him to go forward towards the floor. I grabbed his shirt to keep him from falling out of the chair. I told the nurse about this and she showed me his chair would lean back to prevent him doing that in the future. Review of Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation Inservice documentation dated 04/27/2022 revealed all staff were educated on the facility abuse and neglect policy. B) Review of Resident #14's face sheet dated 05/25/2022 reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses COVID-19 acute respiratory disease, epileptic seizures, history of traumatic brain injury, anxiety and depressive episodes. Review of Resident #14's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected Resident #14 was assessed to have a BIMS score of 10 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #14 was assessed to have mood indicators or feeling down, depressed, or hopeless two to six days a week and having trouble concentrating on things two to six days a week. Resident #14 was further assessed to not have behavior problems during the assessment period. Resident #14 was assessed to require extensive assistance with ADLs. Review of Resident #14's Comprehensive Care Plan reflected a problem with the start date of 05/18/2022 Psychotropic drug use: Resident receives antianxiety medication related to episodes of anxiety, doctor with senior psych increased buspirone 20 mg to BID (twice daily) on 05/17/2022. Approaches included Assess Resident #14 if behavioral/ mood symptoms present a danger to the resident and/or others. Intervene as needed. Further review of Resident #14's care plan reflected a problem with the start date of 03/11/2022 Behavioral Symptoms: Resident #14 sometimes is inappropriate verbally and has touched other residents in non-sexual way without resident's permission. Approaches included Remind Resident #14 of the consequences of inappropriate verbal and physical interactions and redirect Resident #14 when he is inappropriate. Observation and interview on 05/23/2022 at 12:20 PM revealed Resident #14 ambulating in hall in wheelchair. Resident #14 was pleasant and voiced no concerns. Review of Resident #14's nursing progress notes dated 05/17/2022 reflected an entry aggressive /combative behavior, Senior Psych services notified, Doctor is in center now visiting with resident. Review of Resident #14's Event Report dated 05/17/2022 reflected Argument between Resident #14 and Resident #16 in the lobby. Resident #14 was yelling at Resident #16. Was told to be quiet. Resident #16 got out of his chair that was across the lobby and walked up to Resident #14. Resident #14 bowed up and continued to talk to Resident #16. Resident #16 then threw a punch at Resident #14; This nurse did not see contact. Resident #14 then throw a punch at Resident #16. Did not make contact. Resident #16 was moved away from Resident #14. Resident #14 continued to yell at Resident #16. Review of Resident #14's Physician progress note dated 05/18/2022 reflected According to the nurses' he had an altercation yesterday with one of the other residents. When I questioned the patient Resident #14 says that he got punched because he provoked the other man repeatedly. He admits it was his fault. He tells me he is not hurt and that he did not try to hurt the other resident in return . Review of Resident #16's face sheet dated 05/25/2022 reflected a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with the following diagnoses dementia with behavioral disturbances, cognitive communication deficit and muscle weakness. Review of Resident #16's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected Resident #16 was assessed to have a BIMS score of 2 indicating severe cognitive impairment. Resident #16 was assessed to not have behaviors during the assessment period and was assessed to require limited assist with ADLs. Review of Resident #16's Comprehensive Care Plan identified a problem with the start date of 07/21/2021 Behavioral symptoms, Resident #16 hit another resident in the face after that resident provoked him on 05/17/2022. Approaches included always ask for help if resident becomes abusive/resistive, redirect resident as needed and remove from public area when behavior is unacceptable. In an interview during a group meeting on 05/24/2022 at 10:00 AM, Resident #14 stated another resident hit him and Resident #14 wanted to hit him back. Resident #14 said if it happens again, Resident #14 will hit him again in the chest. Resident #14 could not identify when it happened or which resident hit him. Observation and interview on 05/23/2022 at 1:00 PM revealed Resident #16 ambulating in hallway with guidance from staff. Resident #16 did not verbally respond to questions. Review of Resident #16's Nursing Progress Note dated 05/17/2022 reflected aggressive/ combative behavior; Psych services notified today of resident behavior, doctor with geri-psych is in the center now visiting with resident. Review of Resident #16's Event Report dated 05/17/2022 at 9:19 AM reflected Argument between Resident #14 and Resident #16 in the lobby. Resident #14 was yelling at Resident #16. Was told to be quiet. Resident #16 got out of his chair that was across the lobby and walked up to Resident #14. Resident #14 bowed up and continued to talk to Resident #16. Resident #16 then threw a punch at Resident #14; This nurse did not see contact. Resident #14 then throw a punch at Resident #16. Did not make contact. Resident #16 was moved away from Resident #14. Resident #14 continued to yell at Resident #16. Review of Resident #16's Physician progress note dated 05/18/2022 reflected There was an altercation according to staff that the patient had punched another resident after being provoked. The patient does not appear to have any injuries. Does not seem to remember the altercation . Review of the state reporting system TULIP reflected the resident-to-resident altercation between Resident #14 and Resident #16 was not reported to HHSC. An observation on 05/25/2022 at 9:30 AM reflected Resident #16 walked over to Resident #14 in his wheelchair and put his hands around Resident #14's neck and squeezed. Resident #14 began to yell and swing at Resident #16 and said, I am going to kill you. LVN C separated the two men and then another staff member moved Resident #14 away. LVN C walked Resident #16 back towards his room. An observation on 05/25/2022 at 9:50 AM reflected Resident #16 walked around the nurse's station to Resident #14 while Resident #14 made hand gestures at Resident #16. LVN C's back was turned, and surveyor alerted her to the two residents' close proximity. An observation on 05/25/2022 at 10:15 AM reflected Resident #16 standing in between Resident #14's legs while Resident #14 was seated in his wheelchair. Resident #16 was leaning over Resident #14 and Resident #14 had his arm raised in the air. Surveyor alerted nearby staff and they separated the two men. Review of Resident #14's nursing progress notes dated 05/25/2022 reflected Resident sitting in wheelchair and another resident walked over and put both hands around his neck. Resident then pulled his fist back and stated, I'm going to f**ing kill you. Resident then stood up out of wheelchair with fist back. Staff was able to get resident to sit back down in wheelchair. Resident was wheeled outside to calm down. Charge nurse, DON, administrator, PCP, and RP notified . Review of Resident #16's Nursing Progress Note dated 05/25/2022 reflected This nurse was at nurses' station and observed resident walk over to another male resident who was sitting in wheelchair, and place hands around his neck. The nurse was able to get the resident to remove his hands and walk him into the lobby, and resident stated, I am going to kill that son of a b**ch. Resident is now sitting in the recliner drinking water. Charge nurse, DON, administrator, PCP, and RP notified . In an interview on 05/25/2022 at 12:15 PM with the RNC and DON regarding the 05/17/2022 incident between Resident #14 and Resident #16 the DON stated she was told there was no physical contact between the residents. When the DON was asked why his care plan stated Resident #16 hit Resident #14, she stated the care plan was wrong. When asked why the physician progress note also stated that Resident #14 stated he was hit by Resident #16 she stated she did not see the progress note and if that is the case then the incident should have been further investigated and reported. The RNC stated that in light of the physician progress note the incident was an allegation of abuse since Resident #14 stated he was hit by Resident #16 and based on the facilities policy the incident should have been thoroughly investigated and reported to the state. C) Review of Resident #18's face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with the following diagnoses Parkinson's disease (A chronic and progressive movement disorder that initially causes tremor in one hand, stiffness or slowing of movement.) Bipolar disorder (A serious mental illness characterized by extreme mood swings. They can include extreme excitement episodes or extreme depressive feelings.) and Dementia. Review of Resident #18's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected Resident #18 was assessed to have a BIMS score of 3 indicating severe cognitive impairment. Resident #18 was assessed to not have behaviors. Resident #18 was assessed to require extensive to dependent assist with all ADLs. Review of Resident #18's Comprehensive Care Plan reflected a problem with the start date 05/16/2022 reflected Category: ADL Functional/ Rehabilitation Potential Resident #18 is unable to use ROM in BUE (bilateral upper extremities). Further review reflected a problem dated 04/27/2022 Impaired skin integrity as evidence by reddened area to left eye. Further review reflected a problem with the edited dated 04/29/2022 Resident #18 has episodes of resisting care .she will curse and call staff other names when they enter her room. Observation and interview on 05/23/2022 at 12:10 PM revealed Resident #18 in bed. Resident #18 did not respond to questions. Review of Resident #18's Consolidated Physician orders dated 04/25/2022 through 05/25/2022 reflected an order dated 04/26/2022 Left eye bruise apply cold compress on and off as tolerated x 24 hours, then hot alternating with cold next 48-72 hours as tolerated. Review of Resident #18's Nursing progress notes reflected an entry dated 04/26/2022 Called to residents' room by CNA making routine ADL care. CNA observed residents (L) eye and informed this nurse. Resident with new bruise (L) eye outer 3cm x 2cm purple red with skin intact to area. Resident able to look around without difficulty. Resident denies pain or discomfort. This nurse asked resident if she scratched her eye with her finger resident stated yes. Notified D.O.N., notified Dr. notified RP. Further review reflected an entry dated 04/28/2022 .bruise to left eye with no Swelling or complications noted, hot and cold compresses alternating, and resident takes off, total care, all needs met and anticipated by staff, monitor frequently as unable to use call light . 05/02/2022 .bruise to left eye healing . 05/05/2022 Resident sitting in up in bed. area of bruise to left eye . Review of Resident #18's Event Report dated 04/27/2022 reflected reddened area noted to residents left eye, upon assessment, resident participates in her own facial grooming, ADLs, she was noted rubbing/ scratching eyes with facial towel .No evidence to support abuse or neglect . In an interview and observation on 05/24/2022 at 10:30 AM Resident #18 was asked if she had ever had a black eye (eye no longer bruised, no bruising noted to resident) she stated yes, when asked if she scratched her eye she stated yes, when asked if someone hit her, she stated yes and when asked if she hit her face on something she stated yes. Observation on 05/2
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
  • "What safeguards are in place to prevent abuse and neglect?"
  • "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: Federal abuse finding, 6 life-threatening violation(s), 1 harm violation(s), $163,287 in fines. Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 29 deficiencies on record, including 6 critical (life-threatening) violations. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
  • • $163,287 in fines. Extremely high, among the most fined facilities in Texas. Major compliance failures.
  • • Grade F (0/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: This facility has a substantiated abuse finding. Extreme caution advised. Explore alternatives.

About This Facility

What is Cass Valley Healthcare Center's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns CASS VALLEY HEALTHCARE CENTER an overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars, which is considered average nationally. Within Texas, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This mid-range rating indicates the facility meets federal standards but may have areas for improvement.

How is Cass Valley Healthcare Center Staffed?

CMS rates CASS VALLEY HEALTHCARE CENTER's staffing level at 2 out of 5 stars, which is below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 67%, which is 20 percentage points above the Texas average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs. RN turnover specifically is 88%, which is notably high. RNs provide skilled clinical oversight, so turnover in this role can affect medical care quality.

What Have Inspectors Found at Cass Valley Healthcare Center?

State health inspectors documented 29 deficiencies at CASS VALLEY HEALTHCARE CENTER during 2022 to 2025. These included: 6 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death), 1 that caused actual resident harm, 21 with potential for harm, and 1 minor or isolated issues. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.

Who Owns and Operates Cass Valley Healthcare Center?

CASS VALLEY HEALTHCARE CENTER is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by NEXION HEALTH, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 74 certified beds and approximately 28 residents (about 38% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in CENTERVILLE, Texas.

How Does Cass Valley Healthcare Center Compare to Other Texas Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Texas, CASS VALLEY HEALTHCARE CENTER's overall rating (3 stars) is above the state average of 2.8, staff turnover (67%) is significantly higher than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (2 stars) is below the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Cass Valley Healthcare Center?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "What safeguards and monitoring systems are in place to protect residents from abuse or neglect?" "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations, the substantiated abuse finding on record, the facility's high staff turnover rate, and the below-average staffing rating.

Is Cass Valley Healthcare Center Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, CASS VALLEY HEALTHCARE CENTER has documented safety concerns. The facility has 1 substantiated abuse finding (meaning confirmed case of resident harm by staff or other residents). Inspectors have issued 6 Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 3-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Texas. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.

Do Nurses at Cass Valley Healthcare Center Stick Around?

Staff turnover at CASS VALLEY HEALTHCARE CENTER is high. At 67%, the facility is 20 percentage points above the Texas average of 46%. Registered Nurse turnover is particularly concerning at 88%. RNs handle complex medical decisions and coordinate care — frequent RN changes can directly impact care quality. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?

Was Cass Valley Healthcare Center Ever Fined?

CASS VALLEY HEALTHCARE CENTER has been fined $163,287 across 5 penalty actions. This is 4.7x the Texas average of $34,712. Fines at this level are uncommon and typically indicate a pattern of serious deficiencies, repeated violations, or failure to correct problems promptly. CMS reserves penalties of this magnitude for facilities that pose significant, documented risk to resident health or safety. Families should request specific documentation of what issues led to these fines and what systemic changes have been implemented.

Is Cass Valley Healthcare Center on Any Federal Watch List?

CASS VALLEY HEALTHCARE CENTER is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.