HEMPHILL CARE CENTER

2000 WORTH ST, HEMPHILL, TX 75948 (409) 787-3342
For profit - Corporation 89 Beds GULF COAST LTC PARTNERS Data: November 2025 7 Immediate Jeopardy citations
Trust Grade
0/100
#729 of 1168 in TX
Last Inspection: September 2025

Inspected within the last 6 months. Data reflects current conditions.

Overview

Hemphill Care Center has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns about the quality of care provided. Ranking #729 out of 1168 facilities in Texas places it in the bottom half, and it is the second-ranked facility out of two in Sabine County, meaning there is only one local option that is better. While the facility's trend is improving, with issues decreasing from 10 in 2024 to 3 in 2025, it still has a concerning number of 29 total deficiencies, including serious incidents of resident abuse that were not adequately addressed. Staffing is a strength, with a rating of 4 out of 5 stars and a turnover rate of 41%, which is below the state average. However, the facility has incurred $60,212 in fines, which is higher than 77% of Texas facilities, suggesting ongoing compliance issues. Specific incidents included failures to protect residents from abuse, with one resident being punched and others being grabbed or hit, highlighting serious lapses in safety and care protocols.

Trust Score
F
0/100
In Texas
#729/1168
Bottom 38%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Getting Better
10 → 3 violations
Staff Stability
○ Average
41% turnover. Near Texas's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
Penalties
○ Average
$60,212 in fines. Higher than 59% of Texas facilities. Some compliance issues.
Skilled Nurses
✓ Good
Each resident gets 52 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than average for Texas. RNs are trained to catch health problems early.
Violations
⚠ Watch
29 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Overall Rating
★★★★☆
4.0
Staff Levels
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Care Quality
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2024: 10 issues
2025: 3 issues

The Good

  • 4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record
  • Staff turnover below average (41%)

    7 points below Texas average of 48%

Facility shows strength in staffing levels, fire safety.

The Bad

2-Star Overall Rating

Below Texas average (2.8)

Below average - review inspection findings carefully

Staff Turnover: 41%

Near Texas avg (46%)

Typical for the industry

Federal Fines: $60,212

Above median ($33,413)

Moderate penalties - review what triggered them

Chain: GULF COAST LTC PARTNERS

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

The Ugly 29 deficiencies on record

7 life-threatening 2 actual harm
Sept 2025 3 deficiencies 2 Harm
SERIOUS (G)

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 of 5 residents (Residents #1) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan to address the risk for developing pressure ulcers and the lack of interventions caused Resident #1 to experience a pressure ulcer to her left heel on 8/28/2025. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the necessary care and services. Findings included: Record review of a facility face sheet dated 9/20/2025 revealed Resident #1 was an [AGE] year-old female that admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of fracture to left lower leg. Record review of an admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 had a BIMS of 10 indicating moderately impaired cognition and was at risk for developing pressure ulcers. Record review of a Braden Scale for predicting pressure sore risk assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 was at risk for developing pressure ulcers. Record review of Resident #1's comprehensive care plan dated 8/20/2025 revealed Resident#1's care plan did not address her risk for developing pressure ulcers or that she had a splint in place to her left ankle. Record review of care area assessment (CAA) trigger report dated 8/20/2025 revealed Resident #1 needed a care plan to be developed to address pressure ulcer risks, and a care plan was not developed to address the problems/risks identified in the MDS assessment. Record review of a progress note dated 8/25/2025 from the NP G revealed Resident #1 had limited range of motion to the left leg and a splint was in place to the left lower extremity. Record review of order summary report dated 8/28/2025 revealed Resident #1 had an order to apply skin prep to unstageable to left heel every shift until area resolves or treatment changes. Record review of a skin assessment report dated 8/29/2025 revealed Resident #1 had a deep tissue injury to her left heel. Record review of a weekly skin assessment report dated 8/30/2025 revealed Resident #1 had black discoloration noted with skin intact to left heel. Review of wound care note dated 9/05/2025 by the wound care doctor revealed Resident #1 had a pressure injury to her left heel measuring 3 cm x 2.4 cm and to apply skin prep and offload wound. During an interview on 9/22/2025 at 12:19 pm LVN B said that when residents were admitted the nurse completed an initial baseline care plan, but the DON was responsible for completing the comprehensive care plans. She said a comprehensive care plan was a tool used by the nurses to know what care each resident needed. She said by not having an accurate and complete care plan it could cause a decline in resident health. During an interview on 9/22/2025 at 1:35 pm the DON said she was responsible for completing and updating the comprehensive care plan. She said Resident #1 should have had a comprehensive care plan that addressed her splint, skin breakdown risk and actual breakdown on her left heel. She said she completed the care plan but did not realize those items had not been identified. She said that by not having a comprehensive care plan resident care could be delayed. She said she was responsible for completing and updating the comprehensive care plan. She said Resident #1 should have had a comprehensive care plan that addressed her splint, breakdown risk and actual breakdown on her left heel. She said she completed the care plan but did not realize those items had not been identified. She said that by not having a comprehensive care plan resident care could be delayed. During an interview on 9/24/2025 at 11:00 am the Administrator said the DON was responsible for all care plans and she expected all residents to have a comprehensive care plan that identifies their CAA triggers and interventions were put in place. She said a resident at risk for pressure ulcers should have a care plan. She said by not accurately care planning residents were at risk for medical issues not being identified and addressed appropriately. She said going forward all residents' care plans would be addressed with the IDT and reviewed to ensure they were accurate. Record review of a facility policy titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered dated 2002 indicated, .A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. 7.The comprehensive, person-centered care plan: a. includes measurable objectives and timeframes; b. describes the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, including: (3) which professional services are responsible for each element of care; c. includes the resident's stated goals upon admission and desired outcomes; d. builds on the resident's strengths; and e. reflects currently recognized standards of practice for problem areas and conditions.
SERIOUS (G)

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Pressure Ulcer Prevention (Tag F0686)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure necessary treatment and services, consistent with professio...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing and prevent new pressure injuries from developing was provided for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for pressure injuries (Resident #1). 1. The facility did not ensure Resident #1 had orders and interventions in place related to an ankle splint to prevent pressure injuries on admission 8/07/2025.2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 did not develop a pressure related deep tissue injury on 8/28/2025. These failures could place residents at risk for new development or worsening of existing pressure injuries, pain, and decreased quality of life. Findings included: Record review of a facility face sheet dated 9/20/2025 revealed Resident #1 was an [AGE] year-old female that admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of fracture to left lower leg. Record review of an admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 had a BIMS of 10 indicating moderately impaired cognition and was at risk for developing pressure ulcers. Record review of a Braden Scale for predicting pressure sore risk assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 was at risk for developing pressure ulcers. Record review of Resident #1's comprehensive care plan dated 8/20/2025 revealed Resident#1's care plan did not address her risk for developing pressure ulcers or that she had a splint in place to her left ankle. Record review of Resident #1's consolidated order summary report dated 8/08/2025 revealed Resident #1 did not have in place any orders related to a splint to her left ankle. Record review of an admission assessment report dated 8/8/2025 revealed Resident #1 was admitted with a left ankle fracture, but the nurse did not address the splint to her ankle. Record review of a skin assessment report dated 8/8/2025 revealed no information related to a splint or device to Resident #1's ankle. Record review of a skin assessment report dated 8/29/2025 revealed Resident #1 had a deep tissue injury to her left heel. Record review of a history and physical note from the hospital dated 7/27/2025 revealed Resident #1 had a left ankle splint. Record review of a history and physical note dated 8/13/2025 from a local hospital revealed Resident #1 had a recently fractured left ankle and a splint was in place. Record review of a progress note dated 8/25/2025 from the NP G revealed Resident #1 had limited range of motion to the left leg and a splint was in place to the left lower extremity. Record review of order summary report dated 8/28/2025 revealed an order for Resident #1 to apply skin prep to unstageable to left heel every shift until area resolves or treatment changes. Review of wound care note dated 8/29/25 by the wound care doctor revealed Resident #1 was not assessed by the doctor for the deep tissue injury to her left heel. Record review of a weekly skin assessment report dated 8/30/2025 revealed Resident #1 had black discoloration noted with skin intact to left heel. Review of wound care note dated 9/05/2025 by the wound care doctor revealed Resident #1 had a pressure injury to her left heel measuring 3 cm x 2.4 cm and to apply skin prep and offload wound. During an interview on 9/21/25 at 10:21 am LVN D said Resident #1 had a splint on her left ankle that was to remain in place until she saw the doctor, but she could not recall any specific orders for the splint or if that information was documented anywhere in her admission note. She said she was not the nurse that admitted Resident #1. She said when a resident had a device it should be documented and there should be orders and interventions in place to prevent pressure ulcers. She said they did use pillows to offload but Resident #1 would kick them away. She said the nurses rounded with the wound care doctor and was not sure why he did not see her for the pressure injury on her heel on 8/29/2025 but they had treatment orders for skin prep already. She said that not having orders and interventions in place for any device or for residents at risk for pressure injuries could cause pressure ulcers to develop and a decline in health. Attempted call on 9/21/2025 at 10:34 am to admission nurse LVN C with no answer and message left. During an interview on 9/22/25 at 8:30 the Wound Care Doctor said he had seen Resident #1 a few times but couldn't recall how many times. He said he was treating a DTI to her heel that developed. He said she had a splint on her leg at one time but could not recall the date he was called about the heel. He said the facility notified him of any new areas and he assessed them on his weekly visits. He said the nurses often would call and get orders prior to his visit and then he would modify those orders if needed once he saw the resident. During an interview on 9/22/25 at 12:05 pm CNA F said she cared for residents that had ADL care issues and required assistance with positioning. She said residents that needed assistance, pillows and wedges were used to offload pressure. She said she cared for Resident #1, and she had a splint on her leg, and it couldn't be removed so they put her feet on pillows. She said if a resident was at risk for pressure sores, then they should have things in place to prevent those sores from developing. During an interview on 9/22/25 at 12:19 pm LVN B said Resident #1 was admitted to the facility with a splint in place to her left ankle. She said she could not recall any specific orders related to the splint but at some point, it was removed. She said there should have been a progress note regarding the splint. She said Resident #1 developed a DTI to her left heel but could not recall the date of the development. She said the area was dark purple, the skin was intact, and the order was for skin prep. She said she completed the readmission assessment on 8/15/2025 on Resident #1 when she returned from a hospital stay and the skin assessment should have addressed the splint and there should have been measures in place to prevent pressure ulcer development. She said that by not having thorough assessments, orders and interventions for residents at risk for pressure ulcers then ulcers can develop and affect the resident's well-being. During an interview on 9/22/25 at 1: 18 pm the ADON said skin assessments were completed weekly, on admission/readmission and as needed for new skin issues found. She said Resident #1 had a nonremovable splint on admission that should have been documented, and she was to see the orthopedic doctor but got sick and went to the hospital for a few days. She said when Resident #1 returned she contacted the orthopedic doctor the next week about the splint. She said they called her back to arrange an appointment and told her it was ok to remove the splint. She said when she removed the splint Resident #1 had a deep tissue injury to her left heel and redness to the side of her foot. She said the doctor and family were notified and an order for skin prep was started. She said the wound doctor saw her and assessed the areas and was assessing it weekly. She said his initial visit was 8/29/2025 and was not aware he did not address the heel wound. She said he addressed it the next week on 9/05/2025. She said she thought she charted all that information but must have forgotten. She said by not properly assessing and initiating interventions for residents at risk for pressure ulcers, pressure ulcers could develop. During an interview on 9/22/25 at 1:35 pm the DON said Resident #1 had a left ankle splint on admission and that splint was to remain in place until she returned for her follow up visit with the orthopedic. She said on admission the nurse should have called to receive orders related to the splint and she should have reviewed the admission to ensure all measures were in place. She said she did not recognize the wound care doctor did not assess the heel wound the following day after it was found but she had assessed it and put in a skin assessment. She said she made sure the wound doctor saw her on his next visit 9/05/2025. She said that devices were a cause of pressure injuries and there should have been measures in place to prevent pressure ulcers from developing. During a phone interview on 9/23/2025 at 3:59 pm LVN C said that she was the nurse that admitted Resident #1 on 8/07/2025. She said she did her assessments and Resident #1 had a splint in place to her left ankle. She said when she received report from the hospital that evening, she was told to leave the splint in place until the resident had her follow up visit. She said she could not get the resident entered in the facility charting program and forgot to chart the splint and orders in a progress note once she was in the system. She said that she charted Resident #1's skin color and pulses but no mention of the splint. She said the resident should have had orders and interventions in place for the splint because of her risk of developing pressure ulcers. She said care plans were completed by the DON. During an interview on 9/24/2025 at 9:25 am the orthopedic staff nurse said that when Resident #1 admitted to the facility she had a nonremovable splint to her left ankle and typically that splint stayed in place until their follow up with the orthopedic. She said the facility did not contact the office according to the records to receive post operation instructions for the splint. She said the facility did call later regarding removing the splint and orders were given and they saw the resident in the office on 9/03/2025. During an interview on 9/24/2025 at 11:00 am the Administrator said the DON and the ADON were responsible for ensuring that all residents have an accurate assessment, orders and interventions in place. She said that the facility also had a regional nurse that reviews the resident records. She said when a resident was admitted she expected the nurse to complete a complete and accurate assessment of that resident and identify any devices such as splints and risk for pressure ulcers. She said that by not doing that residents were at risk for developing pressure ulcers. She said going further the interdisciplinary team would discuss more depth each admission at morning meeting and identify any areas of concern that need to be addressed. Record review of a facility policy titled Pressure Ulcers/Skin Breakdown dated 2001 indicated, .1. The nursing staff and Attending Physician will assess and document an individual's significant risk factors for developing pressure sores; for example, immobility, recent weight loss, and a history of pressure ulcer(s). 2. In addition, the nurse shall describe and document/report the following: a. Full assessment of pressure sore including location, stage, length, width and depth, presence of exudates or necrotic tissue; c. Resident's mobility status; d. Current treatments, including support surfaces 3. The staff will examine the skin of a new admission for ulcerations or alterations in skin. Record review of a facility policy titled Skin assessment dated [DATE] indicated, .It is our policy to perform a full body skin assessment as part of our systematic approach to pressure injury prevention and management. 1.A full body, or head to toe, skin assessment will be conducted by a licensed or registered nurse upon admission/re-admission and weekly thereafter. The assessment may also be performed after a change of condition or after any newly identified pressure injury. 7. Documentation of skin assessment: a. Include date and time of the assessment, your name, and position title. b. Document observations (e.g. skin conditions, how the resident tolerated the procedure, etc).
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility were stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility were stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, and included the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date when applicable for 1 of 1 vaccine/medication storage refrigerators reviewed for labeling and storage. The facility failed to monitor and record temperatures of the refrigerator located in the medication room used for vaccine storage twice daily as required per the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines for vaccine storage when temperatures were logged for the refrigerator one time each day from September 1, 2025, until September 22, 2025. This failure could place residents who receive medications at risk of not receiving the intended therapeutic benefit of the medications.Findings included: During an observation and interview on 9/23/2025 at 8:45 AM 5 packages of ten injectable influenza vaccines were inside the medication room refrigerator. LVN B said the staff check and log the refrigerator once a day. LVN B said the nursing staff check the temperature and make sure it is between 35 to 40 degrees. Record Review of the medication refrigerator log for September 2025 indicated the refrigerator was monitored daily and a temperature was documented on the log within perimeters (36- and 46-degrees Fahrenheit), one time each day from September 1, 2025, until September 22, 2025. During an interview on 09/23/2025 at 1:30 PM The ADON said the facility had not been checking the temperature or logging as required by standards of care. The ADON said she would start checking the temperatures twice daily and logging as required. The ADON said not maintaining the correct temperature could diminish effectiveness. During an interview on 9/24/2025 at 9:00 AM the DON said the refrigerator was checked daily and the temperature was recorded on the log located on the refrigerator in the medication room. She said she was not aware that the temperature should be checked and logged twice daily if vaccines were stored in the refrigerator. She said that if the vaccine were not stored appropriately, they could lose potency and may not be effective. During an interview on 9/24/2025 at 9:15 AM the Administrator said the ADON and DON were responsible for medication storage, and she expected all requirements for storage of immunizations and medications to be followed. She said that if the vaccine were not stored appropriately, they could lose potency and may not be effective. Record Review of a policy and procedure titled Medication Storage in the Facility dated 2018 indicated, .The facility should check the refrigerator or freezer in which vaccines are stored, at least two times a day, per CDC Guidelines. Record Review of policy and procedure titled Medication Labeling and Storage dated 2001 indicated, .The facility stores all medications and biologicals in locked compartments under proper temperature, humidity and light controls. Only authorized personnel have access to keys. Record review of https://CDC.gov/vaccines/storage document accessed 9/23/2025 Indicated: Keep your storage units and vaccines within the appropriate temperature ranges. Store vaccines between 36- and 46-degrees Fahrenheit. Check and record storage unit min/max temperatures at the start of each workday. If your device does not display min/max temperatures, then check and record current temperature a minimum of 2 times (at start and end of workday).
Aug 2024 5 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Resident Rights (Tag F0550)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident was treated with respect, dignity...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident was treated with respect, dignity, and care for 1 of 12 residents (Resident # 27) observed for care in that: RA C failed to sit while feeding Resident #27 in the dining room on 8/12/2024. This failure could place residents at risk of not being treated with dignity and respect. Findings included: Record review of an admission Record dated 8/13/2024 for Resident #27 indicated he admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was [AGE] years old with diagnoses of quadriplegia (condition where both arms and legs are paralyzed) and dysphagia (difficulty eating). Record review of a Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #27 indicated he did not have any impairment in thinking with a BIMS score of 15. He was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living. Record review of a care plan dated 5/28/2024 and revised on 6/3/2024 for Resident #27 indicated he had an ADL self-care performance deficit with interventions for eating: required total assistance to eat. During an observation in the dining room on 8/12/2024 at 12:19 p.m., Resident #27 was observed sitting in a wheelchair at a table. His lunch tray was served, and RA C assisted him with seasoning and cutting up his food. She assisted Resident #27 with feeding and was standing the entire time. During an interview on 8/12/2024 at 12:40 p.m., RA C said she had been employed for 6 months and was contract staff for the therapy department. She said she assisted with mealtimes with some of the residents in the facility. She said she would observe how they ate and would assist with feeding if needed. She said she made sure if they were eating to check for swallowing issues. She said when she assisted Resident #27 with feeding, she liked to stand on the right side of him so she would not have to reach across him. She said no one ever told her to sit or stand while feeding. She said it bothered her hips to sit, so she preferred to stand. She said she had been a CNA for 12 years but did not remember having any training related to sitting while feeding a resident. During an interview on 8/13/2024 at 3:16 p.m., Resident #27 said RA C was not the one who usually assisted him with feeding. He said on occasions she assisted him with eating, but it was in the therapy room, and she would usually sit while doing so. He said it did not bother him if staff stood by him or not while feeding him. During an interview on 8/14/2024 at 9:40 a.m., the ADON said staff should be at eye level, sitting by residents when they are assisting them with feeding. She said she was not aware of the incident on 8/12/2024 in the dining room with RA C. She said RA C was contract staff hired through the therapy department and would start including them in the in-services that were conducted with the facility staff. She said she would probably feel embarrassed if someone was standing while feeding her. She said RA C had certain residents on her tasks to assist with feeding but most times she assisted them in the resident's room or in the therapy room. During an interview on 8/14/2024 at 9:45 a.m., the DON said she had been employed in her position since 4/1/2024. She said staff should be sitting down and never standing while feeding a resident. She said staff should take their time while feeding the residents. She said going forward they would continue to in-service staff and redirect if necessary. She said RA C had an in-service on 8/12/2024. During an interview 8/14/2024 at 10:15 a.m., the Administrator said she has been employed since November 2023 and received her license on Friday 8/9/2024. She said staff should be at eye level with residents when assisting with feeding, sitting down in front of them. She said the RA C was in-serviced on dignity and respect on 8/12/2024. She said going forward she would make sure staff knew the rules and regulations of how to perform in the dining room with meals and educated on dignity and respect to make sure everyone was aware of how to assist a resident in the dining room. She said the staff were in-serviced on 8/12/2024 and would continue to monitor. Record review of an in-service training dated 8/12/2024 on dignity and respect regarding resident dining indicated RA C was in attendance by her signature. Record review of a facility policy dated 2001 indicated, .All residents shall be treated with kindness, respect, and dignity
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' environment remained as free ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for accident hazards. (Resident #27) The facility failed to develop and implement a policy and procedure to properly handle the care of Hoyer lift slings including interventions to inspect the Hoyer sling for signs of damage before each use and not removing damaged slings from service for Resident #27. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of falls and injuries if damaged lift sling broke during mechanical lift transfers. The findings were: Record review of a facility face sheet dated 08/12/2024 indicated Resident #27 was a [AGE] year-old male that re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with quadriplegia (paralysis of all four limbs), and intracranial injury (brain damage) due to motor vehicle accident. Record review of a quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #27 had a BIMS score of 15 indicating intact cognition, impairment of all extremities, and dependent for all transfers. Record review of a comprehensive care plan revised 06/03/2024 indicated Resident #27 required two staff members for transfers. During an observation on 08/12/2024 at 12:30 AM, Resident #27 was sitting in a Geri-chair with a lift sling underneath his buttocks, the straps were faded in color, the blue strap was almost gray in color, the care tags were illegible, torn, crinkled, and [NAME]. During an observation and interview on 08/13/2024 at 09:45 AM, a lift sling in the linen storage closet was fraying with loose stitching and an area of the blue trim pulled apart when stretched by CNA D. CNA D was not aware the manufacturer recommended for them to be taken out of service if the sling had a change in color or the label was illegible, that it indicated it had been worn, bleached, or was compromised. She said she would remove the lift sling being used for Resident #27 because it was unsafe. CNA D said she had 4 residents that required a Hoyer lift for transfers in the facility. CNA D said that if a sling was not available on the hallway, she would go to the linen storage closet and retrieve one for use. CNA D said the resident could suffer an injury or could be scared to get up with a lift if they were dropped . CNA D said she had received training to remove lift slings if they are coming unsewn or had tears. During an interview and observation on 08/13/2024 at 09:55 AM, a lift sling in the linen storage closet had frays in the threading, [NAME] and the blue tab pulled apart from the sling. The DON removed the sling from the closet to discard it. The DON said she worked for the facility for almost 14 months, and she removes slings if they have holes, frays, or strings but she was not aware the manufacturer recommended for them to be taken out of service if the sling had a change in color or the label was illegible, that it indicated it had been worn, bleached, or was compromised. The DON said the resident could suffer an injury if the straps broke and it was all the staff's responsibility to remove defective slings from service. During an observation and interview on 08/13/24 at 3:00 PM, of the laundry area revealed there was one lift sling in the dryer. Laundry staff E worked at the facility for 4 months. Laundry staff E said she had received training to remove slings that have ravels on the edges, and threads that were pulling out. Laundry Staff E was not aware the manufacturer recommended for the Hoyer slings to be taken out of service if the sling had a change in color or the label was illegible, that it indicated it had been worn, bleached, or was compromised and she was not aware that some manufacturer's recommended only air drying. During an interview on 8/14/2024 at 9:40 AM, the Administrator said that lift slings are discarded according to the facility policy and manufacturer's suggested guidelines which is that the slings are discarded when the slings show signs of wear or any tears. The administrator said that the CNAs are to inspect the slings for any signs of rips or tears prior to using the sling. She said that the ADON also inspects the slings monthly and replaces any slings with signs of wear and tear with new slings. She said that moving forward staff will be inspecting for rips, tears, and fading. She said that residents are at risk for injury if a sling does not function properly. A record review of Full Body Slings- Medline, Instructions for use www.medline.com accessed 08/14/2024 reflected .Always inspect slings prior to each use. Signs of rips, tears, or frays indicate sling wear which is unsafe and could result in injury. Signs of color fading, bleached areas, or permanent wrinkles on the straps indicate improper laundering which is unsafe and could result in injury. Any slings with signs of wear or improper laundering should be immediately removed from use Sling maintenance best practices .Check condition before each use. If there is any fraying or visible wear and tear, do not use. Reusable slings should be replaced every six months. Follow care instructions on wash tag. If illegible, do not use. Keep at least two reusable slings per patient on hand-one available and one in the laundry. A record review of a facility policy for Lifting Machine, using a Mechanical dated July 2017 indicated .Sling Care: 3. Discard any worn, frayed or ripped slings. A record review of a facility assessment dated [DATE] indicated . Physical Equipment is checked monthly and as needed by maintenance department. Nursing department checks medical equipment before use.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0919 (Tag F0919)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to be equipped to allow residents to call for staff th...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to be equipped to allow residents to call for staff through a communication system which relayed the call directly to a centralized staff work area for 2 of 29 residents reviewed for call lights. (Resident #11 and Resident #21) The facility failed to ensure Resident #11 and Resident #21's emergency call light in the bathroom had a cord enabling it to be reachable from the floor. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving care and services to maintain highest level of well-being. Findings included: 1.Record review of a facility face sheet dated 08/13/2024 indicated Resident # 11 was an [AGE] year-old female that admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease (a disease that affects memory, thinking and interferes with daily life). Record review of a quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident # 11 had a BIMS of 99 indicating severe impaired cognition, and inability to answer questions. She required substantial assistance with toileting and is frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. Record review of a comprehensive care plan revised 08/13/2024 indicated needing limited assist with toileting and had frequent bowel and bladder incontinence. 2. Record review of a facility face sheet dated 08/13/2024 indicated Resident #21 was an [AGE] year-old female that admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease (a disease that affects memory, thinking and interferes with daily life). Record review of a quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident # 21 had a BIMS of 99 indicating severe cognitive impairment inability to answer questions and received substantial assistance with toileting. It indicated that Resident #21 was frequently incontinent of bladder but continent of bowel. Record review of a comprehensive care plan revised 06/10/2024 indicated Resident # 21 had intervention to take resident to the toilet at the same time every day for bowel continence. And that she had an ADL self-care performance deficit related to Alzheimer's disease and required assistance with bladder incontinence. During an observation and interview on 08/12/24 at 9:45 AM room [ROOM NUMBER], the bathroom call light had a string 2 inches long sticking out of the wall. Resident #21 was not interviewable. She smiled and shook head yes when spoken to. During an observation and interview on 08/12/24 at 10:00 AM room [ROOM NUMBER], the call light string in the bathroom does not reach the floor by 2 feet. Resident # 11 was not interviewable, she was unable to answer questions appropriately. During an interview on 08/14/24 at 09:30 AM with CNA F, she said that she had worked at the facility for 1 month, said that Resident #21 is able to go to the bathroom on her own. She said that staff will assist at times, but the resident will go to the bathroom independently. CNA F said that Resident #11 required assistance to go to the bathroom. CNA F said that if there is a missing or short call light string in the bathroom it is reported to the maintenance supervisor, and he fixes it immediately. CNA F said that if the call light string in the bathroom is too short then the resident would not be able to reach it to call staff for help and that would result in a delay in helping the resident. During an interview on 08/14/24 at 10:00 AM, the Administrator said that the direct care staff is responsible for identifying and reporting issues that include the call light cords. She said that she and the maintenance supervisor do daily rounds to identify environmental issues. She said that the staff can communicate any maintenance issues by putting a note in the maintenance notebook located at the nurse's station. She said that the maintenance supervisor checks the communication book daily. She stated that the call lights and cords are checked daily. She said that if the call light chord in the bathroom was not long enough that a resident would not be able to call for assist if they fall. During an interview on 08/14/24 at 10:30 AM, the maintenance supervisor said that housekeeping and direct care staff report any problems with the call light or missing call light strings. He said if there is a missing call light string in the bathroom, the staff is to report to maintenance immediately and the nurse is to be in the room with the resident until the string can be replaced. The maintenance supervisor said that he does daily rounds and checks the rooms for call light issues and any short or missing strings. He said that if the call light string in the bathroom is broken or too short then a resident that needs assistance is not able to alert the staff and get the help that he needs. Record review of a facility policy revised March 2021 Answering the call light Policy: .be sure the call light is within easy reach of the resident. And Report all defective call lights to the nurse supervisor promptly.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 3 of 8 residents (Resident #12, #19 and #27) reviewed for infection control. 1. Facility failed to ensure CNA B and LVN A did not place Resident #12's foley catheter drainage bag (bag that drains urine from bladder) on floor during a transfer on 8/12/24. 2. Facility failed to ensure RA C washed or sanitized her hands between serving/feeding Residents #19 and #27 on 8/12/24. These failures could place residents at risk for cross contamination and infection. Findings include: 1.Record review of a facility face sheet dated 8/12/24 for Resident #12 indicated that she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and subsequently readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including: chronic kidney disease (a gradual loss of kidney function that can lead to kidney failure), urinary tract infection, and urinary retention (a condition where you are unable to completely empty your bladder). Record review of a Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #12 indicated that she had a BIMS score of 11, which indicated that she had moderate cognitive impairment. She required substantial/maximal assistance with most all ADLs, and she had an indwelling catheter. Record review of a comprehensive care plan dated 3/15/24 for Resident #12 indicated that she had an indwelling foley catheter with an intervention to maintain drainage bag off the floor. Record review of a [NAME] dated 8/12/24 for Resident #12 indicated that under Bladder/Bowel section, intervention included .maintain the drainage bag off the floor . Record review of a physician order report dated 8/12/24 for Resident #12 indicated that she had the following order: .Foley Cath Care Q shift and PRN every shift . dated 8/11/23. During an observation and interview on 8/12/24 at 3:04 p.m., CNA B and LVN A were observed transferring Resident #12 from wheelchair to bed. During transfer, CNA B removed foley catheter drainage bag from wheelchair and placed it on the floor underneath chair. After transfer completed, CNA B picked bag up off floor and hung it on side of bed with bottom of bag still touching the floor. Before exiting room, this surveyor asked LVN A if there was anything wrong. She raised resident's bed and bag was no longer touching floor. When asked why the bag should not touch the floor, LVN A replied, Because the bladder won't empty? CNA B was asked if she knew why the bag should not be on the floor and she replied that she did not know. Both staff members said they had been trained on infection control. Record review of a Nurse Skills Checklist dated 7/9/24 for LVN A indicated that she had been trained on foley catheter care and infection control. Record review of a Nurse Aide Proficiency dated 7/9/24 for CNA B indicated that she had been trained on catheter care. 2.Record review of an admission Record dated 8/13/2024 for Resident #27 indicated he admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was [AGE] years old with diagnoses of quadriplegia (condition where both arms and legs are paralyzed) and dysphagia (difficulty eating). Record review of a Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #27 indicated he did not have any impairment in thinking with a BIMS score of 15. He was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living. Record review of a care plan dated 5/28/2024 and revised on 6/3/2024 for Resident #27 indicated he had an ADL self-care performance deficit with interventions for eating: required total assistance to eat. During an observation on 8/12/24 at 12:19 p.m, in the dining room, Resident #27 was observed in a wheelchair sitting at a table. His lunch tray was served, and RA C assisted him with seasoning and cutting up his food without washing or sanitizing her hands. 3.Record review of an admission Record dated 8/13/2024 for Resident #19 indicated she admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was [AGE] years old with diagnoses of Alzheimer's Disease (a brain disorder that slowly destroys memory and thinking skills), heart failure, and major depressive disorder (persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest). Record review of a Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #19 indicated she had severe impairment in thinking with a BIMS score of 5. She required partial/moderate assistance with eating. Record review of a care plan dated 6/5/2024 for Resident #19 indicated she had an ADL self-care performance deficit related to Alzheimer's Disease with interventions for eating that included: required one staff participation to eat. During an observation on 8/12/24 at 12:21 p.m. in the dining room, Resident #19 was moved to the table with Resident #27. RA C was assisting Resident #27 with eating. RA C did not wash or sanitize her hands and stood by Resident #19 and started cutting up her food and explained to Resident #19 what the foods were on the plate. RA C then proceeded to help Resident #27 with eating his meal and she did not wash or sanitize her hands after contact with Resident #19's utensils. During an interview on 8/12/24 at 12:40 p.m., RA C said she had been employed for 6 months and was contract staff for the therapy department. She said she assisted with mealtimes with residents #27 and #19. She said she would observe how they ate and would assist with feeding if needed. She said she made sure if they were eating to check for swallowing issues. She said she did not sanitize her hands before assisting Residents #19 and #27 and said she just did not think about it. She said there could be a risk for bacteria or viruses if staff did not wash or sanitize their hands. During an interview on 8/14/24 at 9:40 a.m., the ADON said she was not aware of the incident on 8/12/24 in the dining room with RA C. She said RA C was contract staff hired through the therapy department and would start including them in the in-services that were conducted with the facility staff. She said staff should wash or sanitize their hands before assisting with resident meals and in between residents. She said there was a risk for cross contamination. During an interview on 8/14/24 at 9:45 a.m., the DON said she had been employed in her position since 4/1/2024. She said staff should sanitize their hands before and after assisting with meals, and before changing to assist another resident. She said there was a risk for infections, germs, or cross contamination. She said going forward they would continue to in-service staff and redirect if necessary. She said RA C had an in-service on 8/12/2024 on hand hygiene. During an interview on 8/14/24 at 10:11 a.m.-10:15 a.m., the Administrator said she had been here in training since November and just received her license this past Friday 8/9/2024. She said having the foley bag on the floor could be an infection control risk or something could possibly crawl up the bag to the resident from the floor. She said going forward they will be holding in-services and training all staff on infection control and foley care. She said the risk to residents include infection or harm. She said RA C was in-serviced on hand hygiene and hands should be sanitized prior to assisting with meals, between each resident, and residents should have their hands sanitized as well. She said there was a risk for bacteria, infections, and diseases to be passed on from one resident to another. She said going forward she would make sure staff knew the rules and regulations of how to perform in the dining room with meals and make sure everyone was aware of how to assist a resident in the dining room. She said the staff were in-serviced on 8/12/2024 and would continue to monitor. Record review of a facility in-service training dated 8/12/2024 on hand hygiene indicated RA C was in attendance by her signature. During an interview on 8/14/24 at 10:25 a.m., the ADON said she was the infection preventionist and that the foley bag being on the floor could cause a resident to get an infection. She said going forward she would be training staff on proper placement of foley bags. Record review of a training transcript dated 8/12/24 for CNA B indicated that she had been trained on infection control and prevention on 4/26/24. Record review of a facility policy titled Handwashing/Hand Hygiene revised October 2023 indicated, .This facility considers hand hygiene the primary means to prevent the spread of healthcare associated infections. 2. All personnel are expected to adhere to hand hygiene policies and practices to help prevent the spread of infections to other personnel, residents, and visitors. Indications for Hand Hygiene: 1. Hand hygiene is indicated: a. Immediately before touching a resident; d. after touching a resident; e. after touching the resident's environment . Record review of a facility policy titled Catheter Care, Urinary dated 2001 and revised in September 2014 read .Be sure the catheter tubing and drainage bag are kept off the floor .
MINOR (C)

Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact

Staffing Information (Tag F0732)

Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure nurse staffing data was posted daily and readily accessible to residents and visitors with all required information fo...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure nurse staffing data was posted daily and readily accessible to residents and visitors with all required information for for 2 of 3 days reviewed (8/12/2024 and 8/13/2024) nurse staffing posting. The facility failed to post the daily staffing information in a prominent place on 8/12/2024 and 8/13/2024. This failure could place residents, families, and visitors at risk of not being informed of the census and number of staff working each day to provide care on all shifts. Findings: During an observation on 8/12/2024 at 9:15 a.m., there was no daily staffing posting in or around the front entrance or at the nurse station. During an observation on 8/12/2024 at 3:23 p.m., there was a daily staffing posting for the facility on the bulletin board down P-hall by the Administrator's office and the time clock (not in a central location, easily visible to all residents and visitors). The staff posting was dated 8/12/2024 and had all necessary information that included the daily census and number of staff. During an observation on 8/13/2024 at 8:50 a.m., there was a daily staffing posting for the facility on the bulletin board down P-hall by the Administrator's office and the time clock (not in a central location, easily visible to all residents and visitors). The staff posting was dated 8/13/2024 and had all necessary information that included the daily census and number of staff. During an interview on 8/13/2024 at 11:50 a.m., the ADON said she was responsible for completing the daily schedule, but the DON was responsible for putting out the staff posting daily on the bulletin board by the time clock. During an interview on 8/13/2024 at 1:35 p.m., the DON said she had been employed in her position since 4/1/2024 and the ADON was responsible for completing the daily staffing schedule. The DON said she would go into the system and validate the shift and could update it to reflect any changes that were necessary. She said she would print out the staff posting that showed how many staff were providing care in the facility along with the census and put in on the bulletin board by the time clock. She said she kept the previous postings in a binder. She said the weekend RNs would post them as well in the same location. She said the residents were aware of where to find the information. She said the Regional Nurse told her to post it there. She said she was not aware the staff posting had to be in a place that was visible where everyone could see it. She said the current location where the staff information was posted by the time clock and visitors would not be able to see it. She said residents or visitors may think there was not any licensed staff in the building if they did not know where the staff posting was located. During an interview on 8/13/2024 at 1:40 p.m., the Regional Nurse said the DON or ADON was responsible for posting the staffing daily and it should be posted by the front door. She said she was aware that the staff posting was by the time clock earlier that day and it should have been posted by the front door. During an interview on 8/14/2024 at 10:15 a.m., the Administrator said she had been employed since November 2023 and received her license on Friday 8/9/2024. She said the staff posting should be placed by the front entrance for everyone to see. She said it had always been placed by the bulletin board by the time clock prior to yesterday 8/13/2024. She said she was not aware that the staff posting had to be placed where people could see it until she was informed by the Regional Nurse on yesterday 8/13/2024. She said the staff posting location was changed and it was not visible to everyone who entered the facility prior to yesterday 8/13/2024. Record review of a facility policy titled Posting Direct Care Daily Staffing Numbers revised July 2016 indicated, .Our facility will post on a daily basis for each shift, the number of nursing personnel responsible for providing care to residents. 1. Within two (2) hours of the beginning of each shift, the number of Licensed Nurses (RN's, LPNs, and LVN's) and the number of unlicensed nursing personnel (CNA's) directly responsible for resident care will be posted in a prominent location (accessible to residents and visitors) and in a clear and readable format .
Jul 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0837 (Tag F0837)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the facility had an Administrator licensed by the state that was responsible for management of the facility for 1...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the facility had an Administrator licensed by the state that was responsible for management of the facility for 1 of 1 facility's reviewed for governing body. The facility failed to ensure the Assistant Administrator, who was acting as the facility Administrator, had an active Texas Administrator license. This deficient practice could result in the facility not being managed in a responsible manner, which could affect the health and safety of all residents. The findings included: During an observation, record review, and interview on 7/22/2024 at 8:45 AM, the Surveyor entered the facility and was approached by CNA A. Surveyor asked CNA A to notify the administrator of Surveyor entrance. The Surveyor was then approached by the Assistant Administrator who at that time introduced herself to the Surveyor as the administrator. The Surveyor was then led to the conference room where the entrance conference took place. After the entrance conference was held the Assistant Administrator was sent the entrance forms to complete and the Assistant Administrator went back to the Surveyor and told the Surveyor she was not the licensed administrator for the facility. The Assistant Administrator then said the Regional Director of Operations was the one who was licensed, and she was the administrator by proxy. The Assistant Administrator then filled out the entrance form and on the question of who the Administrator was she answered the Regional Director of Operations name back slash her name and proxy. During an interview on 7/23/24 at 11:09 AM, the ADON said she had worked at the facility since February 2023. The ADON was asked who the administrator of the facility was, and she gave the Assistant Administrators name. The ADON said the Regional Director of Operations would come to the building once a month or so. She said the last time the Regional Director of Operations was last at the building was sometime at the end of June or the beginning of July. The ADON said if there were any incidents in the facility that needed to be reported to the administrator, she would report them to the Assistant Administrator. During an interview on 7/23/24 at 1:30 PM the DON said she had worked at the facility since 4/01/2024. She said the Regional Director of Operations was the Corporate Administrator. The DON said the Assistant Administrator had finished school and just had to test to obtain her administrators license. She said if there were any incidents in the facility that needed to be reported to the administrator, she would report them to the Assistant Administrator, and did not know if the Assistant Administrator reported the incidents to the Regional Director of Operations or not. She said the Regional Director of Operations would come to the facility about once a month. During an interview on 7/23/2024 at 3:00 PM the Assistant Administrator said she had worked at the facility since November of 2023. She said she was hired at the facility in the middle of November 2023 and worked with the Previous Administrator under his license until November 30, 2023, which was his last day of employment. She said then on December 1st, 2023, she continued at the facility and worked as the administrator by proxy under the Regional Director of Operation's license who was the licensed administrator for the facility. She said the Regional Director of Operations had been the licensed administrator for the facility since 12/1/2023 to current. She said the Regional Director of Operations would come to the facility maybe 3 times a month, and the last time he was here was about 2 weeks ago. The Assistant Administrator said if there were any incidents that needed to be reported to the administrator, she would notify the Regional Director of Operations by phone. She said it was her fault the facility had not had a full-time administrator in 8 months because she was supposed to have her administrators license in December of 2023 and did not pass her test. She said she had now passed the first 2 portions of her test and was scheduled to take the final portion on 7/31/24. During an interview on 7/24/2024 at 12:15 PM the Regional Director of Operations said he had worked for the company for 18 years and his official title was Regional Director of Operations. He said he did not know why the Assistant Administrator had introduced herself to the Surveyor as the administrator because she was hired as the Assistant Administrator. He said he had not been the licensed administrator for the facility since December 1, 2023, when the Assistant Administrator was hired because he had been using his license in sister facilities. He said he could not remember the exact date but said he thought it was around February 2024 when he started using his administrator license for this facility. He said he knew the Assistant Administrator's test was scheduled for 7/31/2024 and said he would either have a licensed administrator at that time or would be advertising for one. He said he would be the licensed administrator for the facility starting on 7/29/2024. He said he knew the facility had deficient practice by not having a licensed administrator and knew it would be cited. During an interview on 7/24/2024 at 1:00 PM the Business Office Manager said she had worked at the facility since 11/8/2021. She said she did not keep up with who was the sitting licensed administrator for the building. She said hiring for all department heads was done at the corporate level. She said that once corporate had decided they were going to hire a department head they would reach out to her and ask that she run employee background check and employee misconduct checks on the employee. She said other than that she did not have anything to do with the hiring process for a department head. She said the Assistant Administrator's official job title was Assistant Administrator. She said she did not know who the licensed administrator for the facility was at that time. During an interview on 7/24/2024 at 1:24 PM the Corporate Clinical Director said he had worked for the company for about 10 ½ years. He said the Regional Director of Operations was the licensed administrator for the facility from 3/18/2024 to 6/19/2024. He said he had been at the facility 6 days in the month of June 2024 and had not seen the Regional Director of Operations. The Corporate Clinical Director said he was a licensed nursing home facility administrator but had never used his license for this facility. The Corporate Clinical Director said he was also an RN and worked strictly on the clinical side. He said it was the responsibility of the Assistant Administrator to notify the Regional Director of Operations of any incidents or allegations of abuse or neglect. The Corporate Clinical Director said he would report all incidents to him and he would also make sure the Regional Director of Operations was notified of any incidents or allegations that needed to be reported to the administrator. He said the Regional Director of Operations was always readily available for any administrator tasks if he was in the facility or via technology if he was not in the facility. Record review of facility employee list dated 7/22/2024 titled Employee Demographics revealed the Assistant Administrator was hired fulltime on 11/16/2023 with the job title of Administrator. Record review of facility New Hire Ticket undated revealed the Assistant Administrator was hired on 11/16/2023 with the Discipline/Job Title: Assistant Administrator. It also revealed that once the Assistant Administrator passed her exams she would be promoted to Administrator. Record review of facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement committee reports, and performance improvement plans dated 2/13/2024, 2/28/2024, 3/13/2024, 4/4/2024, 5/15/2024, 5/30/2024, 6/12/2024 revealed: the Assistant Administrator held all meetings signed as the administrator, the Regional Director of Operations did not attend any meetings. Record review of the facility's Assistant Administrator job description dated November 1, 1999, revealed: Position Summary: Under the direction of the Administrator, the Assistant Administrator leads and directs certain aspects of the facility operations in accordance with state and federal regulations, and facility policies and procedures. B. Administrative Responsibilities: 1. Assists the Administrator in managing facility operations . Summary of Qualifications: 2. Maintains a current, valid Texas Nursing Home Administrator's License. 4. Possesses strong knowledge regarding state, federal and local regulations as they pertain to long term care. Record review of the Facility Assessment Tool dated 6/03/2024 revealed: Persons (names/titles) involved in completing assessment listed under Administrator the Regional Director of Operations, the Assistant Administrator proxy. Record review of the facility policy titled Administrator with revised date of March 2021 revealed: Policy Statement: A licensed administrator is responsible for the day-to-day functions of the facility. Policy Interpretation and Implementation 1. The governing board of this facility has appointed an administrator who is duly licensed in accordance with current federal and state requirements. The administrator is responsible for, but not limited to: a. managing the day-to-day functions of the facility; i. maintaining his/her license on a current status as required by law and maintaining a copy of such license or registration on premises.
Jun 2024 2 deficiencies 2 IJ
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Deficiency F0557 (Tag F0557)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to be treated with respect and dignit...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to be treated with respect and dignity for 1 of 8 residents reviewed for resident rights. (Resident #1). The facility failed to ensure CNA A respected Resident #1's rights and dignity during her shower on 5/29/24. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The Immediate Jeopardy began on 5/29/24 and ended on 5/31/24. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. This failure could place residents at risk of becoming distressed and feeling disrespected. Findings included: Record review of an admission Record dated 6/4/24 indicated Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included lymphedema (a condition that results in swelling of the leg or arm. It occurs due to blockage in the lymphatic system which is part of the immune system), hypertension (high blood pressure), diabetes (a disease that occurs when blood glucose, also called blood sugar, is too high), and peripheral vascular disease (a disorder of the blood vessels outside the heart that affects blood flow to the limbs). Record review of the most recent MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #1 was able to make herself understood and was able to understand others. She had a BIMS score of 11, which indicated moderately impaired cognition. Resident #1 required partial to moderate assistance with showering (helper doing less than half the effort). Resident #1 had no physical, verbal, or other behavioral symptoms directed towards others Record review of a care plan with a revision date of 4/26/24 indicated Resident #1 had a self-care/mobility focus with a goal to maintain functional abilities. Interventions included, Resident #1 will maintain the ability to bathe self, including washing, rinsing, and drying self. The Resident requires assistance set up supervision with bathing/showering, as necessary. Resident #1 had bladder incontinence, with interventions to ensure Resident #1 had unobstructed pathway to the bathroom, and to monitor/document/report to physician possible medical causes of incontinence. Record Review of Resident #1's Nurses Progress Notes dated 5/29/24 at 11:23 a.m. and signed off by ADON indicated Resident #1 reportedly had an incontinent episode this morning which is unlike the resident. Resident was brought to shower per CNA A and resident was displaying weakness not able to wash self. Resident #1 is yelling/cursing at staff, crying, and not able to be consoled. This is not baseline for resident. Call placed to MD with new order for UA with C &S (urinalysis with culture and sensitivity). Will continue to monitor and assess as allowed. Record review of the facility's provider investigation report dated 6/2/24 indicated the following: date of incident 5/30/24 at 12:14 p.m. Resident #1 was independently ambulatory, interviewable and had the capacity to make informed decisions. Resident #1 had no history of combativeness, similar incidents, wandering, sexual misconduct, verbal aggression, or physical aggression. CNA A was named as the alleged perpetrator and had a history of similar allegations. The agency immediate response, Resident #1 was independent and did not want assistance in showering. Expressed to CNA A she did not want him in the shower room or in her room. Investigation findings were inconclusive. Agency action post investigation, The fact that there were two incidents that were involving CNA A, we determined that in the interest of the residents, it be best if we parted ways with CNA A. Record review of a Grievance/Complaint Report dated 4/7/24 indicated that Resident #2 had reported to a hospital case manager that CNA A was rough in the shower and when transferring her. Document indicated ADON was designated to take action on this concern. Date assigned was 4/8/24. Actions taken included Abuse and neglect in-service, for all staff and in-service CNA A on using a lighter touch when showering. Resolution of grievance/complaint included a written warning was done with CNA A regarding shower techniques, abuse, and neglect. Form signed off by Administrator/grievance officer. Record review of a Verbal Warning Record dated 4/8/24 indicated CNA A indicated ADON educated CNA A on lighter touch while in shower and also proper transfer techniques. Record review of an unnamed document provided by facility dated 4/9/24 indicated CNA A received sensitivity training on abuse and neglect (different forms of abuse), baths, attitude, transfers, and assignments. Document was signed by ADON, and CNA A. Record review of a Grievance/Complaint Report dated 5/30/24 indicated CNA A was neglecting Resident #1's rights to shower. Resident #1 expressed her feeling like her rights had been violated because CNA A would not allow her to independently bathe. Document indicated the ADON and DON were designated to take action on this concern. Date assigned was 5/30/24. Actions taken included in services on abuse and neglect, safe surveys done on residents under the care of CNA A and emotional monitoring done with Residents. Resolution of grievance/complaint included reporting incident to the State, in-services completed, safe surveys completed, emotional monitoring on Resident #1. CNA A was terminated. Document signed by Administrator/Grievance officer and dated 6/4/24. Record review of a witness statement from CNA A dated 5/30/24 indicated the following, On 5/29 resident was sitting on edge of bed and had an incontinent episode, large amount of urine on the floor. Resident was confused and weak and trembling. The DON notified me of the resident and told me to take resident to the shower. Resident usually bathes self but due to confusion and weakness she could not perform task herself. Resident never stated she felt uncomfortable with me performing shower. Resident kept saying she could do it herself but was falling over in the chair. Resident was upset that she had to have help in the shower and requested this CNA not to go in her room. On 5/30 I left Resident's tray on the cart at breakfast. Resident asked nurse where her tray was. I told nurse the resident requested me not to go in her room, so I left it on the food cart. Resident said she would get it herself. Record review of a witness statement from ADON dated 5/30/24 indicated the following, This nurse heard Resident #1 hollering and cussing in the hallway. Resident #1 was upset that CNA A had to help her in the shower. This nurse tried to talk to Resident #1 and let her know that for her safety in the shower she needed assistance due to new weakness. Resident #1 remains crying and yelling that she was told she could shower alone. This nurse let her know that she always needs to be accompanied by staff in case something happens. Resident becomes more agitated stating she has been lied to that she was told before she came she did not have to be accompanied. Resident exits room to therapy yelling you can all kiss my ass. Record review of an undated form titled Associate Separation Report indicated CNA A's date of hire was 2/23/23 and date of separation was 5/31/24. Reasons for separation included violating federal or state care standards, conduct or neglect of duties determined by management to be detrimental to the welfare of patients, resident, co-workers, the workplace of employer, and must follow all resident care guidelines including but not limited to on-time meals, care and medication and accurate detailed charting. Resident #1 forged a complaint against CNA A regarding her feeling like she was treated with disrespect. CNA A was assisting in resident shower and resident had a history of being independent in showers and she did not feel she needed assistance. The resident was found to have low blood sugar and a UTI, and was not at her baseline, so CNA A expressed that it was his obligation to assist due to her instability. Once the shower was complete, Resident #1 expressed her discontent that she was unable to shower by herself. The next day she lodged a complaint with the Ombudsman regarding CNA A and stated she felt abused. The investigation resulted in showing that abuse was found. Document was signed by Administrator. During an interview with the complainant on 6/3/24 at 4:52 p.m. she stated she had received a call on 5/30/24 sometime between midnight and 3:00 a.m. from LVN L, night shift nurse who told her that Resident #1 was upset over the way she was manhandled by CNA A during her shower on 5/29/24. Complainant stated she could hear Resident #1 in the background crying. Complainant stated she went into the facility on 5/31/24 to talk with Resident #1. Complainant stated Resident #1 told her she thought she had soiled her brief and asked CNA A to help her to the bathroom. CNA A told her get up you're going straight to the shower; I am not going to change you. Resident #1 told him she did not want to be in the shower by herself with a male, and CNA A told her you don't have a choice. Resident #1 stated CNA A kept telling her you're acting crazy, you are not making logical sense. Your blood sugar is low that is why you can't think. Resident #1 then told complainant CNA A forced her into the chair and took her to the shower. Resident #1 stood up and CNA A pushed her up against the shower wall and removed her blouse. Resident #1 told him No, stop, but CNA A continued to remove her blouse. CNA A then shoved Resident #1 down into the shower chair forcefully. Complainant stated Resident #1 told her she felt very afraid and intimidated by CNA A because he was so mean and angry with her. Complainant stated Resident #1 asked for her shampoo and CNA A told her no, you're going to use the shampoo I tell you to use. Resident #1 managed to get her own shampoo and get some in her hair. Complainant stated Resident #1 was very upset, and said she felt embarrassed, and felt that she was assaulted, and did not know what to do about it. Resident #1 told complainant that she refused to go the hospital because she was concerned, they would throw her out of the facility. Resident #1 stated that she liked being there but if they did not do something about that man, she would leave and go to another facility. During an interview on 6/4/24 at 11:50 a.m. Resident #1 stated she had lived in the facility since that last week of April 2024. Resident #1 stated she loved CNA A taking care of her, up until the date of the incident. Resident #1 stated she had been warned by other residents that he was mean and could turn on you real quick. Resident #1 stated that on 5/29/24 CNA A woke her up by slamming her breakfast tray on the table and yelling her name. Resident #1 stated that it startled her and she wet herself. Resident #1 stated she was a bit confused at the time because CNA A woke her up out of a dead sleep. Resident #1 stated CNA A asked her did you pee at church?, you're not yourself. Resident #1 stated CNA A kept getting louder and louder saying I wasn't myself over and over. Resident #1 stated she told CNA A to leave her alone. Resident #1 stated that before she moved into the facility it was a top priority for her to be able to shower herself. Resident #1 stated she called the facility prior to moving in and was told she could shower herself, and it was explained to her the shower room was a separate room in the facility. Resident #1 did not remember who she had talked with. Resident #1 stated she was very modest. Resident #1 stated that CNA A said, come on we're going to the shower, and that CNA A kept twisting me to get my clothes off, and I'm trying to stop him. Resident #1 stated CNA A told her, you are not yourself. Resident #1 stated I told him I'm not getting undressed in front of you, and CNA A continued to take her clothes off. Resident #1 stated he kept trying to get her to sit in a shower chair with a hole in the middle and kept pushing her into the chair. Resident #1 stated she asked CNA A to go behind the privacy curtain and CNA stated, No. This is my job, you want to wash your rosebud by yourself? Resident #1 stated that rosebud referred to her vagina. Resident #1 stated that CNA A kept forcing her to sit in the chair. CNA A put shampoo on her head and would not let her use her own shampoo. Resident #1 stated she unwrapped her Unna boots, (compression dressings made by wrapping layers of gauze around the leg and foot. It is often used to protect an ulcer or open wound. The compression of the dressing helps improve blood flow in your lower leg. Compression also helps decrease swelling and pain), and she begged CNA A to go behind the privacy screen again. Resident #1 stated, I felt like dirt. Resident #1 stated she had always showered by herself prior to this incident. Resident #1 stated she told CNA A you are hurting me. I'm humiliated please go behind the privacy screen. Resident #1 stated she kept repeating it and begged him to go behind the privacy screen, and CNA A did not go behind the screen. Resident #1 stated she did not feel comfortable in the shower chair and that it was slippery. Resident #1 stated CNA A stated, sit there, and stop acting like this. Resident #1 stated with all the commotion, no one came in to check on her. Resident #1 stated she had some bruises on her arms, but she got them while in the hospital, and said she had not seen any other bruises. Resident #1 stated that she was a bit disoriented when she woke up, but CNA A had startled her. I was confused when he kept asking if I peed myself at church. I don't know what he was talking about. Resident #1 said when CNA A brought her back to her room, he picked out some clothes for her to wear, and she told him she did not want to wear what he picked out, and he did not listen to her. Resident #1 stated, what really pissed me off was when we got back to my room, he took my wet towel and started mopping up the floor, like I had peed all over the place. It was a small spot. Resident #1 stated after she got dressed, the ADON came in her room, and said she wanted to talk to her while she was upset. Resident #1 stated the ADON was baby talking to her asking why are you mad, and why are your unna boots off? Are you upset because we care? Resident #1 stated the ADON told her we never told you that you could shower alone, and that there was not one resident in the facility that showers by themselves. Resident #1 stated she did not know why the ADON said that because she knew a lot of Residents that showered by themselves, and that she had showered by herself 3 times a week before this incident. Resident #1 stated that she asked the ADON to leave at that time, and the ADON replied, I still want to get to the bottom of why you are mad and why your unna boots are off. Resident #1 stated she told the ADON again she wanted her to leave, and the ADON stated she did not want to leave. Resident #1 stated she got up and went to the therapy department. Resident #1 stated she would take her unna boots off when she showered, a nurse would remove them, or she was capable of removing them herself. Resident #1 stated that one day, (did not know for sure what day it was), the Administrator came in and told her we need to talk. Resident #1 stated they went into her room and the Administrator said, CNA A is over enthusiastic and means well. Resident #1 stated the Administrator promised no one would go in the shower while she was in there. Resident #1 stated the Administrator apologized for the incident, and Resident #1 told her to keep CNA A away from me, I'm humiliated. Resident stated the next day at breakfast time, CNA A was standing by the food cart and said, she (meaning Resident #1) don't want anything to do with me, she can get the damn tray herself. Resident #1 stated she asked the Administrator if she was going to get to eat if no one was going to bring her tray. Resident #1 stated that after CNA A twisted her all around in the shower, she could not stand very well. Resident #1 stated the facility called an ambulance and she was taken to the hospital where she found out she had pneumonia and flu and spent 3 days in the hospital. Resident #1 stated that the left side still hurt after CNA A manhandled her from the front trying to pick her up and put her in the shower chair. Resident #1 stated yes I was fighting him as he was pulling my clothes off. I had a sports bra on which was hard to get off. Everything came off, I had no say in what came off. Resident began to cry stating, I hate a young male kid seeing this fat person, maybe he was used to it, but I wasn't. It was just too much. Resident #1 stated she had heard other residents talk about CNA A in the smoking area calling him an asshole. Resident #1 stated after she heard these comments she did not want to judge CNA A by what other people said, but wanted to make her own decision about him, and they were right. Resident #1 stated she had no issues before this incident and had no issues with him taking care of her. Resident #1 stated CNA A had also gotten into (verbal altercation) with the cook in the dining room in front of other residents. Resident #1 stated CNA A had also made Resident #3 cry twice. Resident#1 stated she loved living in the facility except for this incident. During an interview on 6/4/24 at 12:40 p.m. Resident #2 was lying in her bed. Resident #2 stated she had received care from CNA A. Resident #2 stated CNA A was yelling and was rough when moving me in bed. Resident #2 stated she did not remember when this occurred, and that she did not report it to anyone. During an interview on 6/4/24 at 12:50 p.m. Resident #3 was sitting outside in the smoking area. Resident #3 stated she had lived in the facility since December 2, 2023. Resident #3 stated CNA A was obnoxious and acted like a bully. Resident #3 stated CNA A talked very loud and had hurt her feelings a couple of times and made her cry. Resident #3 stated he mocked her in the hall in front of another employee. Resident #3 stated CNA A was a smart ass and very unprofessional, and it had gotten out of hand. Resident #3 stated CNA A was not very nice and was a smart ass bully. Resident #3 stated it was so bad, she checked herself out of the facility for a week and went to her family member's house just to get away. Resident #3 stated she checked out about 3 weeks after she had come to the facility, and then came back. Resident #3 stated CNA A hurt her feelings by making fun of her needing her medications. Resident #3 stated there was a day CNA A told her never raise your voice like that to me ever again yelling at the top of his lungs in front of all the smokers. Resident #3 did not remember all the details of the event. Resident #1 stated she did not report this to anyone but should have. During an interview on 6/4/24 at 1:24 p.m. MA B sated he had worked in the facility since November 2023. CMA B stated that CNA A was a hard worker, but horse-played (engaging in activities not related to task at hand) a lot. MA B sated CNA A was rude and arrogant to residents as well as other staff. MA B stated on the day of the incident with Resident #1, CNA A had called for help to stand her up. MA B stated Resident #1 had a look of disgust on her face like, I can't believe this is happening. Resident #1 told MA B that she was told by the facility that she could shower by herself. MA B stated Resident #1 had told CNA A to stand behind the privacy curtain, and he did not. Resident #1 was crying when she came out of the shower, and her face was red. Resident #1 stated CNA A had hurt her feelings. CMA B stated what ever happened in that shower room, CNA A never looked the same . CNA A could not make eye contact with Resident #1. MA B stated CNA A had no respect for his peers or for any woman. MA B stated CNA A had said things to other staff such as your mom is a whore, and you are a crack baby. MA B stated he told CNA A that he had victimized Resident #1. MA B stated that looking at Resident #1, he could see so many emotions in the lady's face. MA B stated he knew that CNA A had been banned from a lot of facilities around the area. MA B stated CNA A told him, I don't know if this job is for me. Every facility I go to I get fired. I don't know what I want to do. During an interview on 6/4/24 at 2:30 p.m. CNA E said he had worked with CNA A a few times. CNA E stated he personally had no problems with CNA A, but he had heard from some residents that CNA A was rough with them . CNA E stated the only resident he could remember was Resident #6. During an interview on 6/4/24 at 2:42 p.m. Resident #4 stated she had been in the facility for about a month. Resident #4 stated she had known CNA A for many years when he was working at another facility. Resident #4 stated she felt CNA A had caused a lot of problems in the facility. Resident #4 stated CNA A had inappropriately touched some ladies. Resident #4 stated Resident #1 was one of them. Resident #4 stated she could not remember any other names and that most of the ladies that he had touched had left the facility because of him. Resident #4 stated CNA A grabs the top and in the middle during showers. Resident #4 stated CNA A did not belong giving ladies showers, and Resident #1 was very upset. Resident #4 stated CNA A tried to do it with ladies because he can get away with it. CNA A has cursed at women and was very disrespectful. CNA A had never touched me as he knows better. Some ladies need help with their showers, but not by him. Resident #4 stated she showered by herself. During an interview on 6/6/24 at 10:55 a.m. Resident #5 stated that she showered by herself. Resident #5 stated CNA A acted like a child. Resident #5 stated she had never witnessed any abuse with him but wouldn't doubt it. Resident #5 stated CNA A was mean to other staff bullying them, and his mouth was always running and he talked very loud. Resident #5 stated she got mad at CNA A because every time she would be walking around in the facility, CNA A kept saying we're going to find you a boyfriend. He would say how bout that one, or that one, and kept pointing at different men. Resident #5 stated she asked him to please not do that as I was embarrassed. During an interview on 6/6/24 at 10:15 a.m. Rehab employee G stated CNA A did not have a good bedside manner. CNA A would joke a lot and did not realize it could hurt feelings. Rehab employee G stated she felt CNA A meant well and was always in a joking mood. Rehab employee G stated she had become close to Resident #1 and helped her get into the facility. Rehab employee G stated she told Resident #1 that therapy would always be a safe place for her to come to if she needed to. Rehab employee G stated Resident #1 told her CNA A had been rough in the shower, and that she was leaning forward in her chair and CNA A grabbed her around the chest area to sit her up, as he was afraid she was going to fall. Rehab employee G stated Resident #1 told her that CNA A put his arms across her chest to sit her up and hurt her ribs when pulling her back in the chair. Rehab employee G stated Resident #1 talked to her the day of the incident. Rehab employee G stated Resident #1 was hysterical when she came to the department, to the point they closed the door for her privacy. Rehab employee G stated Resident #1 was crying. Rehab employee G stated that Resident #1 stayed in the department for about 2 hours. Rehab employee G stated they let her lay down and gave her a heating pad for her back and applied Bio freeze to her shoulders. Rehab employee G stated the day after the incident Resident #1 had told her that CNA A would not bring her breakfast tray to her, and that she could get her own damn tray. Rehab employee G stated she had heard hearsay that CNA A had touched women prior to coming here, but it was just hearsay and she had never witnessed it. During an interview on 6/6/24 at 10:48 a.m. CNA H stated she had worked in the facility since 2012. CNA H said she would sometimes pick up a shift on CNA A's rotation but did not like to work with him. CNA H stated CNA A was different but could not explain how. CNA H stated she had never witnessed any abuse by CNA A. CNA H stated Resident #1 had always showered by herself. CNA H stated Resident #1 told her CNA A roughed her up and that she did not want him in the shower with her, and that he kept pulling her shirt off and pulled her sports bra down. During an interview on 6/6/24 at 11:24 a.m CNA I stated CNA A was very rude, and played too much to be in the field he is in. CNA I stated she had worked with CNA A in another facility and that he acted the same way. CNA I stated if a resident needed anything CNA A had an attitude and would be mouthy (verbally disrespectful). During an interview on 6/6/24 at 11:50 a.m. CNA K stated she had not worked with CNA A very often but that he was playful, arrogant, rude to coworkers and a smart butt. During an interview on 6/6/24 at 12:20 p.m. the DON stated she had worked in the facility since April 1 of this year. DON stated Resident #1 was under the impression that she could shower alone, and due to Resident #1's state of mind, all showers had to be supervised. DON stated Resident #1 had a fall on 5/31/24 and complained of rib pain the next day and did not want x-rays done. DON stated that when Resident #1 was in the shower with CNA A , when Resident #1 said stop, CNA A should have stopped. DON stated the Ombudsman came to visit that day and was told of the situation. During an interview on 6/6/24 at 1:00 p.m. the Administrator stated that when Resident #1 said stop, CNA A should have stopped. Administrator stated she did grievances and had not received any from any staff member regarding CNA A. Administrator stated she did not have a copy of the provider investigator report that was submitted with all training documentation. During an interview on 6/6/24 at 1:00 p.m. ADON stated she talked with Resident #1 the day of her incident with CNA A. ADON stated Resident #1 was crying and stating, I'm humiliated. ADON told Resident #1 she could not take a shower by herself. ADON stated Resident #1 did not want to speak with her and wanted her out of her room. ADON stated every resident is to have assistance in the shower, and she had instructed the staff about it. ADON said she spoke to CNA A after the incident and wrote up what had happened. DON stated CNA A said Resident #1 felt humiliated that he had to bath her, and CNA A told Resident #1 that for her safety he needed to be there. ADON stated that when Resident #1 said stop, he should have stopped. ADON stated she got a statement from CNA A on 5/30/24 and CNA A was sent home during the investigation and was terminated. ADON said she had not received any grievances from staff regarding CNA A. During an interview on 6/6/24 at 2:11 p.m. Resident #6 stated she had lived in the facility for 8 years. Resident #6 stated CNA A had provided care to her and was rough with her when helping her out of the bed. Resident #6 stated she told CNA A it hurt, and he said, so what. Resident #6 said she did not tell anyone, and when asked why Resident #6 stated, I don't know. Resident #6 stated CNA A had helped her with her showers, and never had a problem. Resident #6 stated she had heard CNA A say mean and hateful things. Resident #6 stated she did not remember who he was talking to at the time. On 6/6/24 at 2:21 p.m. and 4:11 p.m. two attempts were made to contact LVN L. No response was received to voicemail left. During an interview on 6/10/24 at 9:45 a.m. the DON stated she was working as a floor nurse on the day of Resident #1's incident on 5/29/24. DON stated she had talked with Resident #1 after the incident and said Resident #1 apologized for being so upset. Resident #1 stated she did not want CNA A in the shower with her. CNA A was out doing a transport at that time but was suspended as soon as he returned to the facility. DON stated she had not had any staff or resident come to her with any concerns with CNA A. DON stated she was not aware of any write-ups on CNA A since she had started working in the facility in April of this year. During an interview on 6/10/24 at 9:56 a.m. the ADON stated that on 5/29/24, she had gone to talk with Resident #1 after the incident. ADON stated Resident #1 was crying and would not talk with her. ADON stated she had looked at Resident #1's ribs, and there were no bruises. ADON stated the DON told her that she had sent CNA A to take Resident #1 to the shower after an incontinent episode. ADON stated Resident #1 was weak and needed assistance. ADON was asked if there were any specific documents she could provide regarding what was covered in the abuse trainings that were done or any documents that talked about what was discussed. ADON stated the abuse/neglect in-service was generic and covered the abuse policy. During a follow up interview on 6/10/24 at 10:16 a.m. Resident #1, stated that on the date of the incident with CNA A, she did not request that a female showered her, she just told CNA A you are not going into the shower with me. You are a kid and a male. Resident #1 stated she thought that was enough. Resident #1 stated CNA A stated, you're not yourself, you don't know what you are saying. Resident #1 stated she was so upset she did not remember if CNA A had helped wash her, but he must have washed some parts because he asked if I wanted to wash my own rosebud. Resident #1 stated she felt CNA A forced her to have that shower. Resident #1 stated she felt at peace now that CNA A was gone, and won't be doing this to anyone else, but I am not at peace after what happened and why it happened. Resident #1 stated, he made me feel so disgraced, and the more I think about it the madder I get. Resident #1 stated she did not feel bad that CNA A got fired. Resident #1 stated, at the time of the incident I kept thinking why isn't there a female in here. I was so busy thinking what is happening and why, I was not able to take the next step of getting him out of the shower. Everything happened so fast, and I was worried about getting covered up and getting him out. I told CNA A to stop and get out, over and over. Resident #1 stated she had chronic back pain and CNA A kept twisting and pulling under her arms and she thought he had broken her ribs which he didn't. Resident #1 stated CNA A lifted her from her rollator walker. (rollators have wheels on all legs, making them easier to push without lifting)to a shower chair, and she had always stood to take her showers. Resident #1 stated today was the first day I could take a shower. I was afraid to go into the shower since the incident. Resident #1 stated that she was a logical person, and knew it would not happen again, but it's kind of like PTSD. Resident #1 stated that she hated that she was still thinking about this incident and did not want to keep bringing it up. Resident #1 stated she felt that she can eventually put it out of her mind, and that it will just take a while. Resident #1 stated she was able to shower on this date by herself, and that two employees checked on her. Resident #1 stated it felt good to get a shower. Resident #1 stated, I know logically, CNA A is not here, but I still have thoughts of my shorts, underwear, shirt and sports bra all being removed by CNA A. Resident #1 stated she felt absolutely comfortable talking with the Administrator and DON if she felt she needed any counseling. Resident #1 stated, despite this incident, I am very happy to
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents the right to be free from abuse and/or neglect for...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents the right to be free from abuse and/or neglect for 1 of 8 residents reviewed for abuse and/or neglect. (Resident #1) The facility failed to prevent CNA A from verbally, physically and mentally abusing Resident #1 while giving Resident #1 a shower on 5/29/24. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The Immediate Jeopardy began on 5/29/24 and ended on 5/31/24. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. This failure could place residents at risk of emotional harm, abuse/neglect, humiliation, intimidation, fear, shame, agitation, degradation, and decreased quality of life. Findings included: Record review of an admission Record dated 6/4/24 indicated Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included lymphedema (a condition that results in swelling of the leg or arm. It occurs due to blockage in the lymphatic system which is part of the immune system), hypertension (high blood pressure), diabetes (a disease that occurs when blood glucose, also called blood sugar, is too high), and peripheral vascular disease (a disorder of the blood vessels outside the heart that affects blood flow to the limbs). Record review of the most recent MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #1 was able to make herself understood and was able to understand others. She had a BIMS score of 11, which indicated moderately impaired cognition. Resident #1 required partial to moderate assistance with showering (helper doing less than half the effort). Resident #1 had no physical, verbal, or other behavioral symptoms directed towards others. Record review of a care plan with a revision date of 4/26/24 indicated Resident #1 had a self-care/mobility focus with a goal to maintain functional abilities. Interventions included, Resident #1 will maintain the ability to bathe self, including washing, rinsing, and drying self. The Resident requires assistance set up supervision with bathing/showering, as necessary. Resident #1 had bladder incontinence, with interventions to ensure Resident #1 had unobstructed pathway to the bathroom, and to monitor/document/report to physician possible medical causes of incontinence. Record Review of Resident #1's Nurses Progress Notes dated 5/29/24 at 11:23 a.m. and signed off by ADON indicated Resident #1 reportedly had an incontinent episode this morning which is unlike the resident. Resident was brought to shower per CNA A and resident was displaying weakness not able to wash self. Resident #1 is yelling/cursing at staff, crying, and not able to be consoled. This is not baseline for resident. Call placed to MD with new order for UA with C &S (urinalysis with culture and sensitivity). Will continue to monitor and assess as allowed. Record review of the facility's provider investigation report dated 6/2/24 indicated the following: date of incident 5/30/24 at 12:14 p.m. Resident #1 was independently ambulatory, interviewable and had the capacity to make informed decisions. Resident #1 had no history of combativeness, similar incidents, wandering, sexual misconduct, verbal aggression, or physical aggression. CNA A was named as the alleged perpetrator and had a history of similar allegations. The agency immediate response, Resident #1 was independent and did not want assistance in showering. Expressed to CNA A she did not want him in the shower room or in her room. Investigation findings were inconclusive. Agency action post investigation, The fact that there were two incidents that were involving CNA A, we determined that in the interest of the residents, it be best if we parted ways with CNA A. Record review of a Grievance/Complaint Report dated 4/7/24 indicated that Resident #2 had reported to a hospital case manager that CNA A was rough in the shower and when transferring her. Document indicated ADON was designated to take action on this concern. Date assigned was 4/8/24. Actions taken included Abuse and neglect in-service, for all staff and in-service CNA A on using a lighter touch when showering. Resolution of grievance/complaint included a written warning was done with CNA A regarding shower techniques, abuse, and neglect. Form signed off by Administrator/grievance officer. Record review of a Verbal Warning Record dated 4/8/24 indicated CNA A indicated ADON educated CNA A on lighter touch while in shower and also proper transfer techniques. Record review of an unnamed document provided by facility dated 4/9/24 indicated CNA A received sensitivity training on abuse and neglect (different forms of abuse), baths, attitude, transfers, and assignments. Document was signed by ADON, and CNA A. Record review of a Grievance/Complaint Report dated 5/30/24 indicated CNA A was neglecting Resident #1's rights to shower. Resident #1 expressed her feeling like her rights had been violated because CNA A would not allow her to independently bathe. Document indicated the ADON and DON were designated to take action on this concern. Date assigned was 5/30/24. Actions taken included in services on abuse and neglect, safe surveys done on residents under the care of CNA A and emotional monitoring done with Residents. Resolution of grievance/complaint included reporting incident to the State, in-services completed, safe surveys completed, emotional monitoring on Resident #1. CNA A was terminated. Document signed by Administrator/Grievance officer and dated 6/4/24. Record review of a witness statement from CNA A dated 5/30/24 indicated the following, On 5/29 resident was sitting on edge of bed and had an incontinent episode, large amount of urine on the floor. Resident was confused and weak and trembling. The DON notified me of the resident and told me to take resident to the shower. Resident usually bathes self but due to confusion and weakness she could not perform task herself. Resident never stated she felt uncomfortable with me performing shower. Resident kept saying she could do it herself but was falling over in the chair. Resident was upset that she had to have help in the shower and requested this CNA not to go in her room. On 5/30 I left Resident's tray on the cart at breakfast. Resident asked nurse where her tray was. I told nurse the resident requested me not to go in her room, so I left it on the food cart. Resident said she would get it herself. Record review of a witness statement from ADON dated 5/30/24 indicated the following, This nurse heard Resident #1 hollering and cussing in the hallway. Resident #1 was upset that CNA A had to help her in the shower. This nurse tried to talk to Resident #1 and let her know that for her safety in the shower she needed assistance due to new weakness. Resident #1 remains crying and yelling that she was told she could shower alone. This nurse let her know that she always needs to be accompanied by staff in case something happens. Resident becomes more agitated stating she has been lied to that she was told before she came she did not have to be accompanied. Resident exits room to therapy yelling you can all kiss my ass. Record review of an undated form titled Associate Separation Report indicated CNA A's date of hire was 2/23/23 and date of separation was 5/31/24. Reasons for separation included violating federal or state care standards, conduct or neglect of duties determined by management to be detrimental to the welfare of patients, resident, co-workers, the workplace of employer, and must follow all resident care guidelines including but not limited to on-time meals, care and medication and accurate detailed charting. Resident #1 forged a complaint against CNA A regarding her feeling like she was treated with disrespect. CNA A was assisting in resident shower and resident had a history of being independent in showers and she did not feel she needed assistance. The resident was found to have low blood sugar and a UTI, and was not at her baseline, so CNA A expressed that it was his obligation to assist due to her instability. Once the shower was complete, Resident #1 expressed her discontent that she was unable to shower by herself. The next day she lodged a complaint with the Ombudsman regarding CNA A and stated she felt abused. The investigation resulted in showing that abuse was found. Document was signed by Administrator. Record review of an undated online training report indicated CNA A received training on preventing, recognizing, and reporting abuse on 2/26/23 when hired. During an interview with the complainant on 6/3/24 at 4:52 p.m. she stated she had received a call on 5/30/24 sometime between midnight and 3:00 a.m. from LVN L, night shift nurse who told her that Resident #1 was upset over the way she was manhandled by CNA A during her shower on 5/29/24. Complainant stated she could hear Resident #1 in the background crying. Complainant stated she went into the facility on 5/31/24 to talk with Resident #1. Complainant stated Resident #1 told her she thought she had soiled her brief and asked CNA A to help her to the bathroom. CNA A told her get up you're going straight to the shower; I am not going to change you. Resident #1 told him she did not want to be in the shower by herself with a male, and CNA A told her you don't have a choice. Resident #1 stated CNA A kept telling her you're acting crazy, you are not making logical sense. Your blood sugar is low that is why you can't think. Resident #1 then told complainant CNA A forced her into the chair and took her to the shower. Resident #1 stood up and CNA A pushed her up against the shower wall and removed her blouse. Resident #1 told him No, stop, but CNA A continued to remove her blouse. CNA A then shoved Resident #1 down into the shower chair forcefully. Complainant stated Resident #1 told her she felt very afraid and intimidated by CNA A because he was so mean and angry with her. Complainant stated Resident #1 asked for her shampoo and CNA A told her no, you're going to use the shampoo I tell you to use. Resident #1 managed to get her own shampoo and get some in her hair. Complainant stated Resident #1 was very upset, and said she felt embarrassed, and felt that she was assaulted, and did not know what to do about it. Resident #1 told complainant that she refused to go the hospital because she was concerned, they would throw her out of the facility. Resident #1 stated that she liked being there but if they did not do something about that man, she would leave and go to another facility. During an interview on 6/4/24 at 11:50 a.m. Resident #1 stated she had lived in the facility since that last week of April 2024. Resident #1 stated she loved CNA A taking care of her, up until the date of the incident. Resident #1 stated she had been warned by other residents that he was mean and could turn on you real quick. Resident #1 stated that on 5/29/24 CNA A woke her up by slamming her breakfast tray on the table and yelling her name. Resident #1 stated that it startled her and she wet herself. Resident #1 stated she was a bit confused at the time because CNA A woke her up out of a dead sleep. Resident #1 stated CNA A asked her did you pee at church?, you're not yourself. Resident #1 stated CNA A kept getting louder and louder saying I wasn't myself over and over. Resident #1 stated she told CNA A to leave her alone. Resident #1 stated that before she moved into the facility it was a top priority for her to be able to shower herself. Resident #1 stated she called the facility prior to moving in and was told she could shower herself, and it was explained to her the shower room was a separate room in the facility. Resident #1 did not remember who she had talked with. Resident #1 stated she was very modest. Resident #1 stated that CNA A said, come on we're going to the shower, and that CNA A kept twisting me to get my clothes off, and I'm trying to stop him. Resident #1 stated CNA A told her, you are not yourself. Resident #1 stated I told him I'm not getting undressed in front of you, and CNA A continued to take her clothes off. Resident #1 stated he kept trying to get her to sit in a shower chair with a hole in the middle and kept pushing her into the chair. Resident #1 stated she asked CNA A to go behind the privacy curtain and CNA stated, No. This is my job, you want to wash your rosebud by yourself? Resident #1 stated that rosebud referred to her vagina. Resident #1 stated that CNA A kept forcing her to sit in the chair. CNA A put shampoo on her head and would not let her use her own shampoo. Resident #1 stated she unwrapped her Unna boots, (compression dressings made by wrapping layers of gauze around the leg and foot. It is often used to protect an ulcer or open wound. The compression of the dressing helps improve blood flow in your lower leg. Compression also helps decrease swelling and pain), and she begged CNA A to go behind the privacy screen again. Resident #1 stated, I felt like dirt. Resident #1 stated she had always showered by herself prior to this incident. Resident #1 stated she told CNA A you are hurting me. I'm humiliated please go behind the privacy screen. Resident #1 stated she kept repeating it and begged him to go behind the privacy screen, and CNA A did not go behind the screen. Resident #1 stated she did not feel comfortable in the shower chair and that it was slippery. Resident #1 stated CNA A stated, sit there, and stop acting like this. Resident #1 stated with all the commotion, no one came in to check on her. Resident #1 stated she had some bruises on her arms, but she got them while in the hospital, and said she had not seen any other bruises. Resident #1 stated that she was a bit disoriented when she woke up, but CNA A had startled her. I was confused when he kept asking if I peed myself at church. I don't know what he was talking about. Resident #1 said when CNA A brought her back to her room, he picked out some clothes for her to wear, and she told him she did not want to wear what he picked out, and he did not listen to her. Resident #1 stated, what really pissed me off was when we got back to my room, he took my wet towel and started mopping up the floor, like I had peed all over the place. It was a small spot. Resident #1 stated after she got dressed, the ADON came in her room, and said she wanted to talk to her while she was upset. Resident #1 stated the ADON was baby talking to her asking why are you mad, and why are your unna boots off? Are you upset because we care? Resident #1 stated the ADON told her we never told you that you could shower alone, and that there was not one resident in the facility that showers by themselves. Resident #1 stated she did not know why the ADON said that because she knew a lot of Residents that showered by themselves, and that she had showered by herself 3 times a week before this incident. Resident #1 stated that she asked the ADON to leave at that time, and the ADON replied, I still want to get to the bottom of why you are mad and why your unna boots are off. Resident #1 stated she told the ADON again she wanted her to leave, and the ADON stated she did not want to leave. Resident #1 stated she got up and went to the therapy department. Resident #1 stated she would take her unna boots off when she showered, a nurse would remove them, or she was capable of removing them herself. Resident #1 stated that one day, (did not know for sure what day it was), the Administrator came in and told her we need to talk. Resident #1 stated they went into her room and the Administrator said, CNA A is over enthusiastic and means well. Resident #1 stated the Administrator promised no one would go in the shower while she was in there. Resident #1 stated the Administrator apologized for the incident, and Resident #1 told her to keep CNA A away from me, I'm humiliated. Resident stated the next day at breakfast time, CNA A was standing by the food cart and said, she (meaning Resident #1) don't want anything to do with me, she can get the damn tray herself. Resident #1 stated she asked the Administrator if she was going to get to eat if no one was going to bring her tray. Resident #1 stated that after CNA A twisted her all around in the shower, she could not stand very well. Resident #1 stated the facility called an ambulance and she was taken to the hospital where she found out she had pneumonia and flu and spent 3 days in the hospital. Resident #1 stated that the left side still hurt after CNA A manhandled her from the front trying to pick her up and put her in the shower chair. Resident #1 stated yes I was fighting him as he was pulling my clothes off. I had a sports bra on which was hard to get off. Everything came off, I had no say in what came off. Resident began to cry stating, I hate a young male kid seeing this fat person, maybe he was used to it, but I wasn't. It was just too much. Resident #1 stated she had heard other residents talk about CNA A in the smoking area calling him an asshole. Resident #1 stated after she heard these comments she did not want to judge CNA A by what other people said, but wanted to make her own decision about him, and they were right. Resident #1 stated she had no issues before this incident and had no issues with him taking care of her. Resident #1 stated CNA A had also gotten into it (verbal altercation) with the cook in the dining room in front of other residents. Resident #1 stated CNA A had also made Resident #3 cry twice. Resident#1 stated she loved living in the facility except for this incident. During an interview on 6/4/24 at 12:40 p.m. Resident #2 was lying in her bed. Resident #2 stated she had received care from CNA A. Resident #2 stated CNA A was yelling and was rough when moving me in bed. Resident #2 stated she did not remember when this occurred, and that she did not report it to anyone. During an interview on 6/4/24 at 12:50 p.m. Resident #3 was sitting outside in the smoking area. Resident #3 stated she had lived in the facility since December 2, 2023. Resident #3 stated CNA A was obnoxious and acted like a bully. Resident #3 stated CNA A talked very loud and had hurt her feelings a couple of times and made her cry. Resident #3 stated he mocked her in the hall in front of another employee. Resident #3 stated CNA A was a smart ass and very unprofessional, and it had gotten out of hand. Resident #3 stated CNA A was not very nice and was a smart ass bully. Resident #3 stated it was so bad, she checked herself out of the facility for a week and went to her family member's house just to get away. Resident #3 stated she checked out about 3 weeks after she had come to the facility, and then came back. Resident #3 stated CNA A hurt her feelings by making fun of her needing her medications. Resident #3 stated there was a day CNA A told her never raise your voice like that to me ever again yelling at the top of his lungs in front of all the smokers. Resident #3 did not remember all the details of the event. Resident #3 stated she did not report this to anyone but should have. During an interview on 6/4/24 at 1:24 p.m. MA B sated he had worked in the facility since November 2023. CMA B stated that CNA A was a hard worker, but horse-played (engaging in activities not related to task at hand) lot. MA B sated CNA A was rude and arrogant to residents as well as other staff. MA B stated on the day of the incident with Resident #1, CNA A had called for help to stand her up. MA B stated Resident #1 had a look of disgust on her face like, I can't believe this is happening. Resident #1 told MA B that she was told by the facility that she could shower by herself. MA B stated Resident #1 had told CNA A to stand behind the privacy curtain, and he did not. Resident #1 was crying when she came out of the shower, and her face was red. Resident #1 stated CNA A had hurt her feelings. MA B stated, whatever happened in that shower room, CNA A never looked the same ., and could not make eye contact with Resident #1. MA B stated CNA A had no respect for his peers or for any woman. MA B stated CNA A had said things to other staff such as your mom is a whore, and you are a crack baby. MA B stated he told CNA A that he had victimized Resident #1. MA B stated that looking at Resident #1, he could see so many emotions in the lady's face. MA B stated he knew that CNA A had been banned from a lot of facilities around the area. MA B stated CNA A told him, I don't know if this job is for me. Every facility I go to I get fired. I don't know what I want to do. During an interview on 6/4/24 at 2:30 p.m. CNA E said he had worked with CNA A a few times. CNA E stated he personally had no problems with CNA A, but he had heard from some residents that CNA A was rough with them. CNA E stated the only resident he could remember was Resident #6. During an interview on 6/4/24 at 2:42 p.m. Resident #4 stated she had been in the facility for about a month. Resident #4 stated she had known CNA A for many years when he was working at another facility. Resident #4 stated she felt CNA A had caused a lot of problems in the facility. Resident #4 stated CNA A had inappropriately touched some ladies . Resident #4 stated Resident #1 was one of them. Resident #4 stated she could not remember any other names and that most of the ladies that he had touched had left the facility because of him. Resident #4 stated CNA A grabs the top and in the middle during showers. Resident #4 stated CNA A did not belong giving ladies showers, and Resident #1 was very upset. Resident #4 stated CNA A tried to do it with ladies because he can get away with it. CNA A has cursed at women and was very disrespectful. CNA A had never touched me as he knows better. Some ladies need help with their showers, but not by him. Resident #4 stated she showered by herself. During an interview on 6/6/24 at 9:10 a.m. LVN F stated she had worked in the facility for 3 years. LVN F stated she was not working the day of Resident #1's incident, but that Resident #1 had told her CNA A had startled her on the morning of the incident waking her up, and that CNA A told her she had to go take a shower and she told him no, as she tried to keep her shirt down as he was pulling it off and hurt her ribs. LVN F stated CNA A had a tendency to blow up verbally and slam doors and had no problems getting in your face . During an interview on 6/6/24 at 10:55 a.m. Resident #5 stated that she showered by herself. Resident #5 stated CNA A acted like a child. Resident #5 stated she had never witnessed any abuse with him but wouldn't doubt it. Resident #5 stated CNA A was mean to other staff bullying them, and his mouth was always running and he talked very loud. Resident #5 stated she got mad at CNA A because every time she would be walking around in the facility, CNA A kept saying we're going to find you a boyfriend. He would say how bout that one, or that one, and kept pointing at different men. Resident #5 stated she asked him to please not do that as I was embarrassed. During an interview on 6/6/24 at 10:15 a.m. Rehab employee G stated CNA A did not have a good bedside manner. CNA A would joke a lot and did not realize it could hurt feelings. Rehab employee G stated she felt CNA A meant well and was always in a joking mood. Rehab employee G stated she had become close to Resident #1 and helped her get into the facility. Rehab employee G stated she told Resident #1 that therapy would always be a safe place for her to come to if she needed to. Rehab employee G stated Resident #1 told her CNA A had been rough in the shower, and that she was leaning forward in her chair and CNA A grabbed her around the chest area to sit her up, as he was afraid she was going to fall. Rehab employee G stated Resident #1 told her that CNA A put his arms across her chest to sit her up and hurt her ribs when pulling her back in the chair. Rehab employee G stated Resident #1 talked to her the day of the incident. Rehab employee G stated Resident #1 was hysterical when she came to the department, to the point they closed the door for her privacy. Rehab employee G stated Resident #1 was crying. Rehab employee G stated that Resident #1 stayed in the department for about 2 hours. Rehab employee G stated they let her lay down and gave her a heating pad for her back and applied Bio freeze to her shoulders. Rehab employee G stated the day after the incident Resident #1 had told her that CNA A would not bring her breakfast tray to her, and that she could get her own damn tray. Rehab employee G stated she had heard hearsay that CNA A had touched women prior to coming here, but it was just hearsay and she had never witnessed it. During an interview on 6/6/24 at 10:48 a.m. CNA H stated she had worked in the facility since 2012. CNA H said she would sometimes pick up a shift on CNA A's rotation but did not like to work with him. CNA H stated CNA A was different but could not explain how. CNA H stated she had never witnessed any abuse by CNA A. CNA H stated Resident #1 had always showered by herself. CNA H stated Resident #1 told her CNA A roughed her up and that she did not want him in the shower with her, and that he kept pulling her shirt off and pulled her sports bra down. During an interview on 6/6/24 at 11:50 a.m. CNA K stated she had not worked with CNA A very often but that he was playful, arrogant, rude to coworkers and a smart butt. During an interview on 6/6/24 at 12:20 p.m. the DON stated she had worked in the facility since April 1 of this year. DON stated Resident #1 was under the impression that she could shower alone, and due to Resident #1's state of mind, all showers had to be supervised. DON stated Resident #1 had a fall on 5/31/24 and complained of rib pain the next day and did not want x-rays done. DON stated that when Resident #1 was in the shower with CNA A , when Resident #1 said stop, CNA A should have stopped. DON stated the Ombudsman came to visit that day and was told of the situation. During an interview on 6/6/24 at 1:00 p.m. the Administrator stated that when Resident #1 said stop, CNA A should have stopped. Administrator stated she did grievances and had not received any from any staff member regarding CNA A. Administrator stated she did not have a copy of the provider investigator report that was submitted with all training documentation . During an interview on 6/6/24 at 1:00 p.m. ADON stated she talked with Resident #1 the day of her incident with CNA A. ADON stated Resident #1 was crying and stating, I'm humiliated. ADON told Resident #1 she could not take a shower by herself. ADON stated Resident #1 did not want to speak with her and wanted her out of her room. ADON stated every resident is to have assistance in the shower, and she had instructed the staff about it. ADON said she spoke to CNA A after the incident and wrote up what had happened. DON stated CNA A said Resident #1 felt humiliated that he had to bathe her, and CNA A told Resident #1 that for her safety he needed to be there. ADON stated that when Resident #1 said stop, he should have stopped. ADON stated she got a statement from CNA A on 5/30/24 and CNA A was sent home during the investigation and was terminated. ADON said she had not received any grievances from staff regarding CNA A. During an interview on 6/6/24 at 2:11 p.m. Resident #6 stated she had lived in the facility for 8 years. Resident #6 stated CNA A had provided care to her and was rough with her when helping her out of the bed. Resident #6 stated she told CNA A it hurt, and he said, so what. Resident #6 said she did not tell anyone, and when asked why Resident #6 stated, I don't know. Resident #6 stated CNA A had helped her with her showers, and never had a problem. Resident #6 stated she had heard CNA A say mean and hateful things. Resident #6 stated she did not remember who he was talking to at the time. On 6/6/24 at 2:21 p.m. and 4:11 p.m. two attempts were made to contact LVN L. No response was received to voicemail left. During an interview on 6/10/24 at 9:45 a.m. the DON stated she was working as a floor nurse on the day of Resident #1's incident on 5/29/24. DON stated she had talked with Resident #1 after the incident and said Resident #1 apologized for being so upset. Resident #1 stated she did not want CNA A in the shower with her. CNA A was out doing a transport at that time but was suspended as soon as he returned to the facility. DON stated she had not had any staff or resident come to her with any concerns with CNA A. DON stated she was not aware of any write-ups on CNA A since she had started working in the facility in April of this year. During an interview on 6/10/24 at 9:56 a.m. the ADON stated that on 5/29/24, she had gone to talk with Resident #1 after the incident. ADON stated Resident #1 was crying and would not talk with her. ADON stated she had looked at Resident #1's ribs, and there were no bruises. ADON stated the DON told her that she had sent CNA A to take Resident #1 to the shower after an incontinent episode. ADON stated Resident #1 was weak and needed assistance. ADON was asked if there were any specific documents she could provide regarding what was covered in the abuse trainings that were done or any documents that talked about what was discussed. ADON stated the Abuse/Neglect in-service was generic and covered the abuse policy. During a follow up interview on 6/10/24 at 10:16 a.m. Resident #1, stated that on the date of the incident with CNA A, she did not request that a female showered her, she just told CNA A you are not going into the shower with me. You are a kid and a male. Resident #1 stated she thought that was enough. Resident #1 stated CNA A stated, you're not yourself, you don't know what you are saying. Resident #1 stated she was so upset she did not remember if CNA A had helped wash her, but he must have washed some parts because he asked if I wanted to wash my own rosebud. Resident #1 stated she felt CNA A forced her to have that shower. Resident #1 stated she felt at peace now that CNA A was gone, and won't be doing this to anyone else, but I am not at peace after what happened and why it happened. Resident #1 stated, he made me feel so disgraced, and the more I think about it the madder I get. Resident #1 stated she did not feel bad that CNA A got fired. Resident #1 stated, at the time of the incident I kept thinking why isn't there a female in here. I was so busy thinking what is happening and why, I was not able to take the next step of getting him out of the shower. Everything happened so fast, and I was worried about getting covered up and getting him out. I told CNA A to stop and get out, over and over. Resident #1 stated she had chronic back pain and CNA A kept twisting and pulling under her arms and she thought he had broken her ribs which he didn't. Resident #1 stated CNA A lifted her from her rollator walker. (rollators have wheels on all legs, making them easier to push without lifting) to a shower chair, and she had always stood to take her showers. Resident #1 stated today was the first day I could take a shower. I was afraid to go into the shower since the incident. Resident #1 stated that she was a logical person, and knew it would not happen again, but it's kind of like PTSD . Resident #1 stated that she hated that she was still thinking about this incident and did not want to keep bringing it up. Resident #1 stated she felt that she can eventually put it out of her mind, and that it will just take a while. Resident #1 [TRUNCATED]
May 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision to ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents and hazards for 1 of 7 residents (Residents #1) reviewed for supervision. Resident #1 accessed the staff breakroom, obtained staff car keys, accessed staff's car, and drove off the premises on [DATE]. This failure places residents at risks for inadequate monitoring and supervision. Findings include: Review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated [DATE], revealed she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including cocaine abuse with cocaine-induced psychotic disorder with hallucinations, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, insomnia, fusion of spine, spinal stenosis (narrowing of spinal canal), cervical disc disorder with radiculopathy (compressed or irritated nerve in the neck), overactive bladder, urinary tract infection onset [DATE], chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (lung disease), and cerebral infarction (stroke). Review of Resident #1's Optional State Assessment MDS, dated [DATE], revealed she had a BIMS score of 11, indicating moderate cognitive impairment and supervision and setup help only for ADL assistance. MDS revealed she had a Mood total severity score of 00, and Behaviors score of 0, indicating no symptoms present for mood or behavior. Review of Resident #1's care plan, revised [DATE], revealed she had impaired cognitive function/dementia/ or impaired thought processes related to Dementia, delirium or an acute confusion episode related to inattention/disorganized thinking with a goal for resident to be free of signs and symptoms of delirium (changes in behavior, mood, cognitive function, communication, level of consciousness, restlessness). Care plan Interventions included to communicate with the resident/family/caregivers regarding residents' capabilities and needs, keep the resident's routine consistent and try to provide consistent care givers as much as possible in order to decrease confusion, provide medications to alleviate agitation as ordered, monitor/document side effects and effectiveness, and reorient the resident to person, place, time, situation as required. Review of Resident #1's current Texas driver's license revealed it was valid from [DATE] and expired on [DATE]. Review of facility sign out log revealed Resident #1 signed herself out on [DATE]. During an interview on [DATE] at 9:04 AM, the ADON said the administrator and DON was not working on [DATE] when Resident #1 stole a staff's car. The ADON said she was not aware of any recent elopement incidents and was aware of the incident when Resident #1 took LVN A's vehicle and left the facility and that she followed her when she drove off. The ADON said that Resident #1 was alert and oriented and did not remember the exact date it occurred. The ADON said that Resident #1 signed herself out of the facility and took LVN A's keys from her personal belongings stored in the breakroom. The ADON said she was in her car in the parking lot when she noticed LVN A's car leaving, so she called LVN A to ask where she was going. LVN A said she was in the facility and suspected that it had to have been Resident #1. The ADON said she followed Resident #1 in LVN A's car about 1/3 of a mile down the road and then she pulled her over and took her back to the facility. The ADON said Resident #1 told her she was going to get ice cream and appeared to be headed in the right direction. The ADON said the Assistant administrator was responsible for reporting incidents and that they agreed the incident was not reportable to HHSC since the resident signed herself out prior to leaving the facility and nothing happened. The ADON said residents are allowed to sign themselves out if they are deemed cognitive enough by the physician. The ADON said they did not report the incident to the police because Resident #1 only wanted ice cream and likes to play pranks and no harm was intended. The ADON said she did not consider Resident #1 as an elopement risk because she was alert and aware of what she was doing. The ADON said Resident #1 had a BIMS score of 11 on [DATE]. The ADON said following the incident staff were in-serviced on keeping personal items away from residents and Resident #1's family was notified. The ADON said Resident #1 had no additional incidents and that staff can lock their items in the lockers or medication room and store personal items out of reach for resident access. During an observation and interview on [DATE] at 9:45 a.m., Resident #1 said that the facility was treating her good and that they helped her when she needed it. Resident #1 said her family told her the facility was number one. Resident #1 said she enjoys being at this facility and only concern was that the ADON visited her yesterday and told her she was going to have to put her in the secure unit for her going down to talk to a resident in his room. Resident #1 then appeared agitated and said she did not want to be placed on the secure unit and begun ambulating independently in her room. Resident #1 continued to ambulate towards HHSC Investigator and appeared agitated. Resident #1 said she had no additional concerns and was apologetic for visit on her behalf. During an observation and interview on [DATE] at 9:53 a.m., LVN A said she had been employed at the facility since [DATE] and provides care for Resident #1. LVN A said she was not aware of any residents leaving the facility recently other than Resident #1 that happened over a month ago. LVN A said she was not sure what day Resident #1 stole her car but that she always stored her keys in her bag in the side pocket and that her bag was in the breakroom. LVN A said nursing staff was required to document any incidents/accidents and that she did not document due to her notifying the next up in the chain of command, the ADON, and since the resident was signed out when it happened. LVN A said Resident #1 took her keys out of her personal backpack stored in the staff breakroom and took her car without her permission sometime after lunch. LVN A said she saw Resident #1 with her keys and that she was a jokester and liked to play pranks and asked Resident #1 what she was doing with her keys and instructed her to put them back. LVN A said Resident #1 was always joking with everybody and didn't think twice about it and thought she was joking around. LVN A said she went down the hall and didn't see Resident #1 leave the facility when the ADON called her on the phone and asked where she was going and told her she was in the facility. LVN A said she parked where she could see her car and it clicked in her head that Resident #1 was not kidding so she told the ADON that it was Resident #1. After the incident, the ADON talked to Resident #1 and provided re-education that taking a staff's car was not acceptable and had an in-service about doing something different when storing our belongings out of residents reach. LVN A said she saw an aide pull up from her lunch break to help her get her car and the ADON got Resident #1 the ice cream she was wanting after she got her to pull over. LVN A said personal items are stored in the lockers with a lock or in the medication room and to not keep lanyards with keys in plain sight. LVN A said Resident #1 had no additional incidents, was doing good, and felt she was appropriately placed and did not need to be on the secure unit. LVN A said she has not noticed any personal items in plain sight from other staff and that her personal bag was located below the nurses station desk now because she just returned from hers son's award ceremony and did not have time to put it up, but that she normally locks it in the medication room. LVN A's backpack was located below nursing station desk. No keys were apparent in conspicuous view. Locks were placed on personal lockers and some lockers with employee names did not have a lock. LVN A said locks were available if needed but that she locks her items in the medication room. Breakroom had counter in locker area that was in conspicuous view from hallway and can be seen by residents in plain sight when door was open. During an interview on [DATE] at 10:06 a.m., CNA B said Resident #1 has not had any behavior of wanting to leave the facility and that no residents have left the facility unaware or eloped recently. CNA B said he was not here the day Resident #1 took staff keys. CNA B said he was aware of what happened with Resident #1. CNA B said following the incident, staff had an in-service over personal belongings to be stored in lockers with locks or in their personal cars. CNA B said he did not have a locker, but that locks were available if needed for lockers. CNA B said after the episode staff are taking more precautions on putting stuff up and there have been no similar incidents since then or Reisdnet #1 wanting to take a car and leave. CNA B said he felt like Resident #1 was appropriately placed and did not need to be on the secure unit. CNA B said Resident #1 leaves on Sunday for church and lets them know when her family arrives. During an phone interview on [DATE] at 10:51 a.m., the Ombudsman said she reported someone stealing a vehicle at this facility to HHSC and had concerns that the ADON said the resident signed herself out when it happened. The Ombudsman said she recieved three different stories on the incident and was aware that they store their purses at the nurses station in plain sight and within reach of residents. The Ombudsman said it was a concern that it was reported nobody saw her go to the breakroom or leave the facility. The Ombudsman said the facility never called to report the incident and received the information from out in the community and that that it happened two weeks ago and the DON and ADON said it happened months ago. The Ombudsman said she had concerns they did not report the incident even though they said she signed herself out because nobody asked her where she was going and it was unkown if she had a driver's license. The Ombudsman said she talked with the ADM, DON, and ADON about the concern on [DATE] over the phone. During a phone interview on [DATE] at 12:53 p.m., the Psychiatric Nurse Practioner said she was fairly new to Resident #1, but that she has seen her and was unaware of her leaving the facility or any elopement or attempted elopement events. The Psychiatric Nurse Practioner said she had no concerns with the care and services provided by the facility. During an interview on [DATE] at 12:58 p.m., the Assistant Administrator and ADON said residents are able to sign themselves out of the facility if they were alert and oriented. They said they were not sure when the incident happened with Resident #1, there was no grievance filed, and that it may not be an incident on the incident report since she was signed out of the facility. The ADON said an incident report was not completed because Resident #1 signed out and left the facility. The ADON said she talked with Resident #1 following the incident and reviewed unauthorized use of staff's car and that taking staff's keys was not appropriate and resident acknowledged and intervention appeared effective. The ADON said education was also provided to staff on storing personal items out of reach from residents locked in their lockers. The ADON said Resident #1's family was notified of what happened and that the doctor was not notified of the incident. The ADON said there was not anyone else notified of the incident aside from Resident #1's family. The ADON said if there was an incident, the nurse would be responsible for completing documentation and that it would be important for the doctor to be notified of an incident if a resident took a staff members car while signed out on pass if there was harm done or something had happened and that nothing bad happened to Resident #1. The Assistant Administrator said Resident #1 went in the breakroom and got the keys out of staff's backpack and the ADON was sitting in the parking lot and called the charge nurse to ask why she was leaving the building and the ADON intervened, the vehicle was pulled over, and the resident was taken to get the ice cream she was after. The ADON said Resident #1 was on psychiatric services after the incident and that it was unrelated to her taking LVN A's car. The ADON said she gave an in-service on personal items on [DATE] the same day the incident happened and that there have been no similar incidents. During an interview on [DATE] at 1:17 p.m., CNA C said she was employed at the facility for 7 to 8 years and felt residents were safe. CNA C said she was working the day Resident #1 left the facility in LVN A's car. CNA C said she was working down the hall and was informed by LVN A that Resident #1 took the keys to her car and left the facility. CNA C said Resident #1 did not tell her she was going to leave and was not sure if she told anyone she was going to leave. CNA C said Resident #1 has her days and that sometimes she is good and sometimes she is a firecracker and has agitatation. CNA C said when Resident #1 came back to the facility after taking LVN A's car she had no injuries. CNA C said residents are able to sign out on pass by themselves. CNA C said after the incident they had an in-service on personal items to be locked up or stored in the breakroom where residents cannot get to it. CNA C said she had no concerns with staff continuing to store personal items in plain sight of residents and that there were no similar incidents that occurred. During an phone interview on [DATE] at 2:00 p.m., the Attending Physicain said for most residents we have secure units and some are bed bound with a handful of patients at the facility for rehab or no other housing that have driven their own cars wthin the last 6 months. The Attending Physician said he was not notified of Resident #1 stealing a nurse's car and leaving the facility and that the resident was cognitive enough to sign herself out of the facility and felt it was more of a moral issue for a MD to possibly be aware of but not a necessity. The Attending Physician said he would probably not wish to be notified of the incident with Resident #1 taking a staff's car and that it may be more of an administrative issue with her stealing. Review of in-service, dated [DATE], revealed training was provided to nursing staff on personal item storage. Review of incident reports between February 2024 through [DATE] revealed no related incidents for Resident #1's behavior of stealing a nurse's car. Review of facility policy, titled Wandering and Elopements, revised [DATE], revealed the following: Policy Statement The facility will identify residents who are at risk of unsafe wandering and strive to prevent harm while maintaining the least restrictive environment for residents. Policy Interpretation and Implementation . 2. If an employee observes a resident leaving the premises, he/she should . c. Instruct another staff member to inform the Charge Nurse or Director of Nursing Services that a resident is attempting to leave or has left the premises . 4. When the resident returns to the facility, the Director of Nursing Services or Charge Nurse shall . e. Complete and file an incident report; and f. Document relevant information in the resident's medical record . Review of facility policy, titled Guidelines for Notifying Physicians of Clinical Problems, revised [DATE], revealed the following: Overview These guidelines are intended to help ensure that .2) all significant changes in resident/patient status are assessed and documented in the medical record . Non-Immediate Notification Situations . 2. The following signs: In general: Any substantial change in physical condition or functional status that is causing no more than minimal distress. For example, moderate behavioral disturbances that is only partially responsive to nonpharmacological interventions .
Apr 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Notification of Changes (Tag F0580)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to immediately inform the resident's responsible party whe...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to immediately inform the resident's responsible party when there was an accident involving the resident which resulted in injury or had the potential for requiring physician intervention for 2 of 8 residents (Resident #1, and Resident #2) reviewed for notification of change of condition. The facility failed to notify Resident #1's responsible party and physician when Resident #1 sustained a witnessed fall on 3/3/24 in her room when she was found sitting on the floor. The facility failed notify Resident #2's responsible party and physician when Resident #2 sustained a bruise to her right eye on 3/31/24 after hitting her face on the wall while being turned for incontinent care. This failure placed residents' caregivers at risk of not being aware of any changes in their conditions and could result in a delay in treatment and decline in residents' health and well-being. Findings included: 1. Record review of an admission Record for Resident #1 dated 3/21/2024 indicated she was a [AGE] year old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a recent readmission date of 1/30/24. Diagnoses included chronic kidney disease, (A condition characterized by a gradual loss of kidney function.), dementia, ( a term used to describe a group of symptoms affecting memory, thinking and social abilities), difficulty in walking and history of falling. Record review of an MDS for Resident #1 dated 2/6/24 indicated she had moderately impaired cognition and required moderate assistance with activities of daily living. Record review of an undated care plan for Resident #1 indicated she had a history of falls, with actual falls on 2/1/24, 3/3/24, and 3/5/24. Interventions included anticipate and meet the needs of the resident, be sure call light is within reach and encourage resident to use it, and physical therapy to evaluate and treat as ordered. Record review of an undated care plan for Resident #1 indicated she had impaired cognitive function or impaired thought processes. Interventions included communicate with the resident/family/caregivers regarding residents capabilities and needs. Record review of nurse progress notes for Resident #1 indicated the following: 3/3/24 11:45 p.m. Resident was hollering Can someone please come help me. Upon arrival to the room Resident was awake, alert sitting on floor in upward position near wheelchair. Resident states I missed the wheelchair and my bottom hit the floor, No change in normal behaviors noted at this time. Resident was assisted to wheelchair and then to bed for further assessment. Resident assessed for injuries; no injuries noted at this time. Signed by LVN A. Record review of a physician progress note dated 3/4/24 at 9:40 a.m. indicated the following; patient complains of back pain after having a fall a couple days ago. Signed by the PA. Record review of a witnessed fall incident report for Resident #1 dated 3/3/24 at 11:45 p.m. revealed no documentation indicating the physician or RP were notified of the fall. Signed by LVN A. Record Review of a radiology report dated 3/5/24 indicated that a lumbar spine x-ray was performed on Resident #1. X-ray conclusion indicated compression deformity at the L1 level (lumbar spine which consists of five vertebrae in the lower back ), age indeterminate. Record review of a grievance/complaint form dated 3/5/24 and signed by the ADON indicated Resident #1's family member stated family was not notified of fall on 3/3/24. Actions taken included in-service training on notification of families. 2. Record review of an admission Record for Resident #2 dated 4/1/2024 indicated she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a recent readmission date of 12/30/22. Diagnoses included cerebral infarction (stroke), Parkinson's disease (a progressive disorder that affects the nervous system and the parts of the body controlled by the nerves) with dyskinesia (uncontrolled, involuntary movements of the face, arms, or legs), vascular dementia (a condition caused by the lack of blood that carries oxygen and nutrients to a part of the brain. It causes problems with reasoning, planning, judgment, and memory), hairy cell leukemia (a cancer of the blood that starts in your bone marrow) in remission, psychotic disorder, and SLE (systemic lupus erythematosus-the most common type of lupus. SLE is an autoimmune disease in which the immune system attacks its own tissues, causing widespread inflammation and tissue damage in the affected organs). Record review of an MDS for Resident #2 dated 1/6/24 indicated she had severely impaired cognition and was totally dependent on staff assistance with activities of daily living. Record review of a care plan with a revision date of 2/7/24 for Resident #2 indicated she was prone to skin tears and bruising of unknown origin related to fragile skin and banging arms and hands on objects, tables, doors, etc. Interventions included all injuries will be monitored until resolved, notify charge nurse of any new bruising or skin tears. Notify physician and responsible party of any abnormal findings. Record review of nurse progress notes for Resident #2 indicated the following: 3/29/24 10:43 a.m. late entry. This nurse in residents room performing incontinent care on resident, while rolling resident over this nurse bumped resident right side of face on wall. No complaints of pain, no redness noted. No injuries noted. This nurse notified charge nurse to check for any delayed injuries. Signed by ADON. 3/31/24 5:00 p.m. this nurse was approached per family members of Resident #2 concerned with a bruise to right side of face. This nurse notified them that resident was being changed and the nurse had rolled her over hitting her head on the right side of wall and we are monitoring her to see if she had any delayed injuries. This nurse went and assessed resident. Resident #2 noted to have bruise to right side of eye red in color. Family also stated that Resident #2 had a bruise to left side of face and jaw was swollen. This nurse examined Resident #2's jaw but jaw is not swollen. Resident #2 able to move jaw up and down without difficulty, denies any pain or discomfort. Discoloration noted to left side of face per normal. This nurse spoke to RP to address concerns of other family members. RP stated that she was unaware of resident hitting head while being changes. This nurse explained that Resident #2 didn't have any injuries at the time, denied any pain, and that this nurse had been watching to make sure resident didn't have any delayed injuries. This nurse explained to RP that there was a bruise to the left side of Resident #2's face but the discoloration had always been there. RP agreed that resident has had that since her initial fall. ADON in facility to assess resident. Hospice enroute to facility. MD updated. Signed by LVN B 3/31/24 5:00 p.m. This nurse received call from LVN B. LVN B states Resident #2's family members are at the facility because resident is showing to have a bruise to right side of face under eye. This nurse reminds charge nurse of the other day when this nurse was performing incontinent care and this nurse asked to watch for delayed injuries. Charge nurse expressed understanding and said that she had went over that with the family but family was still having concerns. This nurse called and spoke to RP. RP stated that she understood that but she was not notified of this nurse accident during incontinent care. This nurse explained to RP that at the time there was no injuries or incident to report but bruises do not occur suddenly and usually take hours/overnight to appear. RP stated that the Resident #2's jaw looked swollen and appeared to have a bruise to left side of face. This nurse told RP that I was unaware of the bruise to left side of face or swollen jaw but I would get with the charge nurse. LVN B stated that the discoloration to Resident #2's face has always been there on the left side of face but her jaw did not appear swollen. This nurse came to facility on 3/31/24 at 5:30 p.m. to examine resident herself. Upon entering room resident had two visitors. Resident's family member stated they were waiting on a hospice nurse to come and examine the resident. This nurse assessed resident. No swelling noted to jaw. Resident #2 able to move up and down without pain or discomfort. Resident #2 does have a discoloration to the left side of face but nothing of abnormality. Even per face sheet picture there is discoloration to left side of face. Went over this with RP who stated that the discoloration on face had been there since an initial fall a few years ago. MD and Hospice made aware. Will continue to monitor and assess as allowed. Signed by ADON. Record review of a PA progress note for Resident #2 dated 4/2/24 at 8:57 a.m. Indicated the following: Resident #2 is a 71 year female with PMH of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, Vascular dementia, HTN, hyperlipidemia, and Hairy Cell Leukemia, Shingles and is lying in bed in normal state. She responds when talking to her and recognizes me but is confused and at baseline. No distress noted. No SOB, no fever, no vomiting, or diarrhea, does have chronic rash face, bilateral arms, and bilateral legs. Chronic rash of face and bilateral extremities secondary to Hairy Cell Leukemia, SLE and shingles. Assessment and Plan: 1. Chronic Rash: patient with chronic rash on face, and bilateral upper and lower extremities secondary to Hairy Cell Leukemia, Lupus, and Shingles. 2. SLE- has scarred patient from prior episodes of acute attacks this is evident by chronic appearing rash 3. Hairy Cell Leukemia- continue current meds as controlling however does have chronic rash per above due to this diagnosis Record review of an incident and accident report dated 3/31/24 at 11:45 p.m. indicated the following: This nurse had reported to charge nurse to monitor for bruising after this nurse was changing Resident #2 and rolled her over hitting Resident #2's right side of face on wall. Resident #2 later on showed a bruise under right side of eye Signed by ADON. During an interview on 3/21/24 at 2:15 p.m., the ADON stated that she had talked to Resident #1's family member on 3/5/24 regarding her concern of not being notified of the fall Resident #1 had on 3/3/24. The ADON stated she filled out a grievance report at that time. The ADON stated that LVN A did not call the family member or the physician. The ADON stated LVN A was counseled and in-service training on falls, and reporting were initiated. During an interview on 4/1/24 at 9:30 a.m., LVN C stated she had worked in the facility for 2 years. LVN C stated she worked on 3/5/24 when Resident #1 had a fall but was not working when she fell on 3/3/24. LVN C stated that when a resident had a fall, staff were to notify the administrator, DON, physician, and family. LVN C stated she called Resident #1's family member, and the physician, after Resident #1's fall on 3/5/24. During an interview on 4/1/24 at 9:45 a.m., the DOR stated she had worked in the facility since June of 2023. DOR stated that if a resident had a fall, a screen was done if the resident agreed. The DOR stated Resident #1 hated therapy. Resident #1 would come on service for a short period of time, then would refuse and want to be taken off services. The DOR stated February 20th was Resident #1's last day of receiving services and was then placed on restorative services. The DOR said Resident #1's safety awareness was lacking. The DOR stated she did not know if the breaks were locked at the time of the incident, but she had previously seen her transfer with them unlocked. During an interview on 4/1/24 at 9:45 a.m., the RA stated she had worked in the facility for 1 month. RA stated she would work with Resident #1 on brushing her hair and her teeth and transferring from the bed to the wheelchair. RA stated Resident #1 was safe to transfer on her own and was very independent. RA stated Resident #1 was alert and oriented with some confusion at times. RA stated Resident #1's bed was in the low position, but she was alert enough to raise and lower the bed. During an interview on 4/1/24 at 10:05 a.m., the CMA stated she had worked in the facility since December 2023. The CMA stated on 3/5/24 she was outside Resident #1's room and was going in to take her vitals and give her medications and found her on the floor. The CMA asked Resident #1 what happened, and Resident #1 stated she slid off the bed. The CMA said she did not see her fall and saw Resident #1 on the floor when she opened the door. CMA stated she could not remember if Resident #1 was calling out for help. During an interview on 4/1/24 at 4:57 p.m., LVN A stated she had worked in the facility since July 2023. LVN A stated she was working on 3/3/24 when Resident #1 was found on the floor around 11:45 p.m. LVN A stated she was walking down the hall making rounds and heard Resident #1 call for help. LVN A went into the room and Resident #1 was on the floor in a sitting position near the bathroom, and her wheelchair was behind her. LVN A stated she believed Resident #1 was coming from the bathroom and tried to get back into the wheelchair and it rolled out from under her. LVN A stated Resident #1 said she did not have any pain at that time. LVN A stated that around 4:00 a.m. on 3/4/24 Resident #1 complained of pain to her back and she gave her Tylenol, which was effective for her pain. LVN A stated she did not notify the doctor or the family. LVN A stated she did not call the doctor because Resident #1 did not hit her head and it was a witnessed fall. LVN A stated the DON was working with her and was aware of the fall. LVN A stated she was going to call the family, but it just slipped my mind. LVN A stated when a resident had a fall the family were to be notified and the doctor if there was a head injury. LVN A stated the physician was not notified. LVN A stated Resident #1 would transfer herself to the bathroom, and also had a bedside commode. Resident #1 did not use her call light to call for help when she needed it. LVN A stated the breaks on the wheelchair were not locked at the time of the incident, and she checked them and found them to be in working order. LVN A stated Resident #1's family should have been notified. During a phone interview on 4/1/24 at 11:15 a.m., the RP stated that on 3/31/24 Resident #2's family members were visiting and sent her a picture of Resident #2 with a black eye, and her jaw was swollen. The RP called the facility and told someone to go check on Resident #2. RP stated the ADON called her and told her she was changing Resident #2 and her face hit the wall, and she had asked the staff to notify her of any bruising. RP stated Hospice RN G went in and assessed Resident #2 and confirmed the black eye. RP stated Hospice RN G told her a wall could not do that bruising, her nose would have hit the wall. Hospice RN G told her there were other areas of bruising which were never reported to her. RP stated Hospice RN G told her the bruising was due to pressure on her legs, not her Lupus, it had to be due to pressure. During an interview on 4/1/24 at 10:55 a.m., the ADON stated that there was an incident on Friday 3/29/24 with Resident #2. The ADON stated she was providing incontinent care to Resident #2 and when she rolled Resident #2 over to her right side towards the wall, Resident #2's right side of her face hit the wall. The ADON stated there was no injury at the time, and she told the nurses to watch her for any delayed injuries. The ADON stated that a bruise showed up on Sunday 3/31/24 under Resident #2's right eye. Resident #2 had discoloration under her left eye, but that had been there for a long time. The ADON stated she was not working at the time but she came up to the facility on 3/31/24 to assess Resident #2 because a family member told the nurse on duty that they were worried about her jaw being swollen as well as the bruise under her eye. The ADON stated that when she assessed Resident #2 she did not notice any swelling to her jaw. The ADON stated the Hospice nurse came in to assess Resident #2 as well. The ADON stated Resident #2's RP was called at 6:40 p.m. on 3/31/24 and told about the bruising. During an observation of Resident #2 on 4/1/24 at 11:15 a.m., Resident #2 was noted to have a purplish brown bruise under her right eye and discoloration under her left eye. There was also a small spot of discoloration to the middle of her forehead. Resident #2 had discoloration to both of her forearms and on both of her legs from the knee to the calf area. The ADON demonstrated how she had pulled up the draw sheet while providing incontinent care on 3/29/24 to Resident #2 and stated she pulled too hard when turning Resident #2 over towards the wall. The ADON stated in talking with Resident #2's RP, her main concern was that she was not notified of the incident. The ADON stated that she did not call the RP on the day of the incident because there was no injury to report. The ADON stated that LVN B called her Sunday 3/31/24 at 4:00 PM to tell her of the bruising and that the family members were upset. During a telephone interview on 4/1/24 at 12:43 p.m., Hospice RN D stated that her last visit with Resident #2 was on 3/25/24. Stated Resident #2 had dark pigmentation spots to both upper extremities and both lower extremities. Stated Resident #2 had pigmentation spots to her forehead and under her left eye. Hospice RN D stated she did not notice any discoloration on her visit under Resident #2's right eye. During an interview on 4/1/24 at 1:05 p.m., CNA E stated she had worked in the facility for 2 years and worked the secured unit. CNA E stated Resident #2 came in with bruises/discoloration to her skin. CNA E stated she did not work the past weekend and did not know when the bruise under Resident #2's right eye appeared and did not remember seeing it when she last worked. During an interview on 4/1/24 at 1:10 p.m., CNA F stated said she had worked in the facility for 1 year and 4 months and worked the secured unit. CNA F stated Resident #2 came to the facility with discoloration to her arms and legs. CNA F stated she did not work the past weekend and was not sure when the bruise under Resident #2's right eye showed up. During an observation on 4/1/24 at 1:15 p.m., CNA E and CNA F rolled Resident #2 to her side. Observation of Resident #2's skin showed no bruising or discoloration to Resident #2's back , buttock area or posterior legs. During an interview on 4/1/24 at 1:25 p.m., the ADON stated that the nurse on duty was responsible for notifying the family and physician of any falls. The ADON stated she talked to Resident #1's family member on 3/5/24, as she was upset she had not been notified of Resident #1's fall on 3/3/24, and that was when she found out that the nurse had not notified the family member. The ADON stated that she filled out a grievance form at that time. ADON stated LVN A was working on 3/3/24, and did not notify the family, she thought she had notified the physician, and the previous DON who was in the facility working at the time was aware. The ADON stated she counseled LVN A on reporting information. The ADON stated this was a verbal counseling, and no paperwork was filled out except for the grievance when she talked to Resident #1's family. The ADON stated that the LVN A told her she honestly forgot to call. The ADON stated that LVN A should have called the family when Resident #1 fell on 3/3/24. During a phone interview on 4/1/24 at 2:10 p.m., the PA stated he was aware of the incident with Resident #2. The PA stated Resident #2 had discoloration to her skin since admission. The PA stated he did not suspect any type of abuse to Resident #2. The PA stated Resident #2 had Lupus, and that was the reason for the scaring/ discoloration to Resident #2's skin. During an interview on 4/1/24 at 2:15 p.m., LVN C stated that Resident #2 had discoloration to her left cheek under her eye, and that it had always been there since she was admitted , as well as the darkened areas to her arms and legs. LVN C stated she did not work the past weekend and this date was the first time she had seen the bruise to Resident #2's right eye. During an interview on 4/1/24 at 2:23 p.m., Hospice Nurse RN G stated Resident #2's family contacted the on call number on Sunday 3/31/24. Hospice Nurse RN G stated she was told that family members were visiting and noticed Resident #2 had a black eye and wanted a visit. Hospice Nurse RN G stated that the facility reported the black eye came from rolling her over. Hospice Nurse RN G stated Resident #2 resided on the dementia unit. Hospice Nurse RN G stated Resident #2 had a bruise to her right hand side of her face. Resident's left side of her face and her cheeks had discoloration. Hospice Nurse RN G stated she knew the Resident had Lupus, and knew she bruised easily. Hospice Nurse RN G stated I understand she has dementia. I worked in the ER for 14 years and I have seen it. The first thing the Resident asked when I went to assess her was if I was going to hurt her. Hospice Nurse RN G stated that her concern was if the Resident hit the wall, why did she not hit her nose?. Stated she knew that dementia residents were at high risk for abuse. Hospice Nurse RN G stated that when she spoke to the Resident #2's RP, she was concerned just from hearing her story. Hospice Nurse RN G stated the nurse (name unknown) said she reported the incident to the daughter, but the daughter was adamant she was not notified. During an interview on 4/2/24 at 9:30 a.m., the ADON stated that every fall required physician notification. On 4/2/24 at 10:20 a.m., an attempted phone interview with LVN B was made. Voicemail left. No response received. During an interview on 4/2/24 at 11:04 a.m., the Assistant Administrator stated she had worked in the facility since mid-November. The Assistant Administrator stated she was not aware of the incident with Resident #1 until Investigator came into the facility. The Assistant Administrator stated Resident #1's family and physician should have been notified, and after she learned of the incident in-service trainings were initiated. Assistant Administrator stated in regard to Resident #2, she knew that the ADON was very thorough in her patient care and had every intention of having Resident #2 monitored after her hitting the wall. The Assistant Administrator stated the ADON told staff to monitor the Resident which did not happen, and monitoring should have been documented. The Assistant Administrator stated that family of Resident #2 should have been notified of the incident when it happened so when the bruise developed the family would have already been alerted. The Assistant Administrator stated, we have rules to be followed. During an interview on 4/2/24 at 11:20 a.m., the ADON stated that at the time of Resident #2's incident, there was no injury and that was why she didn't call the family. The ADON stated that in looking back, Resident #2's family should have been called after the incident occurred. Record review of a facility policy titled Accidents and Incidents-Investigating and Reporting with a revised date of July 2017 indicated, .the following data shall be included on the Incident/Accident form, the date and time physician was notified, the time the person's family was notified and by whom .
Jul 2023 13 deficiencies 5 IJ (3 affecting multiple)
CRITICAL (J)

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Notification of Changes (Tag F0580)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately consult with the physician of a significant change in t...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately consult with the physician of a significant change in the resident's physical, mental, psychosocial status; or a need to alter treatment significantly for 1 (Resident #186) of 1 resident reviewed for notification of change. The facility failed to immediately consult with the resident's physician when Resident #186 had a significant decline in condition as evidenced by pupil changes and behavior changes, which resulted in his death. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was identified on 07/12/23 at 11:15 am. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 11:30 am. While the IJ was removed on 07/13/23, the facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of actual harm with a scope of isolated due to the facility's need to monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of their plan of removal and corrective actions. This failure could place residents at the risk of not receiving appropriate medical interventions timely and effectively, which could result in severe illness, hospitalization or even death. Findings include: Record review of facility face sheet dated 7/12/23 for Resident #186 indicated that he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with subsequent readmission on [DATE] with diagnoses including: right sided hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction (right sided weakness/paralysis due to a stroke), aphasia (problems speaking), dysphagia (trouble swallowing), and type 2 diabetes. Record review of a comprehensive MDS dated [DATE] for Resident #186 indicated that BIMS was not done due to resident being rarely/never understood. Also indicated that he required supervision of 1 person for transfers, and extensive assist of 1 person for toileting. Record review of physician orders dated 7/12/23 for Resident #186 indicated that resident was receiving Aspirin 81mg 1 tablet 1 time per day and Clopidogrel Bisulfate 75mg 1 tablet 1 time per day (medications that can thin the blood causing easy bleeding and increasing risk for internal bleeding). Record review of electronic medical record for Resident #186 indicated that he was a DNR and had been receiving hospice services since 11/2/2022 for diagnosis of CVA (stroke). Record review of incident report dated 1/16/23 for Resident #186 indicated that he had suffered an unwitnessed fall resulting in large gash above right eye and swelling and bruising to right eye. Record review of a care plan, undated, for Resident #186 indicated he was at risk for bleeding and injury associated with daily use of anti-platelet medications (Clopidogrel). Care plan also indicated that he had an actual fall on1/16/23 with injury and interventions included to monitor, document, and report to MD any signs/symptoms of pain, such as bruises, change in mental status, or agitation. Record review of a facility 24-hour report dated 7/12/23 for the dates of 1/16/23 through 1/17/23 indicated that resident had fallen on 1/16/23 and neurological assessments were initiated immediately after fall. 24-hour report indicated that Resident #186's neurological assessment on 1/16/23 at 5:41 pm his CGS was 15 indicating mild head injury. At 6:12 pm on 1/16/23, his score was a 10, indicating a moderate head injury. There was no documentation of physician notification regarding this decline. Record review of hospital paperwork in Resident #186's electronic medical record indicated that Resident #186 was admitted to ICU on 1/17/23 at 5:40 pm. Record review of progress note dated 1/19/23 indicated that Resident #186 readmitted to facility with diagnoses: right frontal intraparenchymal hemorrhage (a bleed that occurs within the brain parenchyma, the functional tissue in the brain); right temporal horn IVH (a bleeding into the brain's ventricular system, where the cerebrospinal fluid is produced and circulates through towards the subarachnoid space. It can result from physical trauma); bilateral subdural hematomas (a dangerous condition where blood collects under the skull, putting pressure on the brain and causing damage or death); left temporal horn IVH (a bleeding into the brain's ventricular system, where the cerebrospinal fluid is produced and circulates through towards the subarachnoid space. It can result from physical trauma). Record review of a progress note dated 1/21/23 for Resident #186 indicated that he passed away on 1/21/23 at 9:23 am. During an interview with DON on 7/11/23 at 4:00 pm, she said that she was not employed by this facility at that time but that she was employed by hospice services on 1/16/23. She said that she had started as the facility DON in February 2023. She said that she had come to the facility to assess Resident #186 on 1/16/23 and she noticed a change from his baseline, and he was unresponsive. She said that she was unable to reach a family member to see what they wanted to do, so she had him sent out to the emergency room. She said in cases where she could not reach family members regarding hospice residents, she would use nursing judgement and sent out for evaluation. She said that any resident that suffered a fall with possible head injury should be sent out for evaluation. During an interview with Resident #186's family member on 7/11/23 at 4:34 pm, she said that the facility did notify her of the fall on 1/16/23 and that she had told them to send him to the ER if they thought that he needed to go. She said that she was under the impression that the nurse would use her judgement to decide if he needed to go. She said that if she had known the severity of the situation, she would have insisted they send him out. She said that once he was in the ICU at the hospital, the doctors there told her that he had five brain bleeds and that there was nothing that they could do. She said that before the fall, he had been active and alert, he just was unable to speak due to a stroke. She said that she had him sent back to the nursing facility because the hospital said that they could not do anything for the bleeding on his brain. During an interview with physician office staff on 7/12/23 at 9:00 am, surveyor was informed the physician was not currently in office, but staff could take a message. Message left with return phone number for physician to call regarding incident on 1/16/23. No return call received from physician before exit from facility. During an interview with LVN L on 7/12/23 at 10:18 am, she said she had worked for the facility from November of 2022 to March of 2023. She said she had worked days in the unit and was working the day of the fall. She said she had been at the nurse's station and was notified by a CNA of the resident's fall. She said she did an assessment and took vital signs on Resident #186. She said around 3:30 pm, he was found laying on the floor and had been trying to get up on his own without assistance. She said that he fell in his room while ambulating unassisted, and he pointed to the bathroom to indicate he was trying to go to the bathroom. She said he had a gash on his forehead on the right side. She said she called the hospice nurse, and the DON at the time. She said the DON at that time came back to the unit and assessed the resident, cleaned his wound, and put steri-strips in place. She said he was not sent to the hospital. She said she was monitoring him every 30 minutes and the wound was still bleeding. She said she notified hospice again about the bleeding. She said she was doing neurological checks, checking pupils with her penlight, and checking his grips. She said his grips were strong. She said his pupils were not dilated; they were normal at 2mm. She said he was moving around a lot, acting restless, moaning, and groaning. She said she worked until 6 pm that evening. She said she had called and spoke to his wife and explained about the fall. She said their protocol was to notify hospice regarding incidents with any hospice residents and hospice would instruct on what to do. She said there were no in services done regarding the incident. During an interview with LVN C on 7/12/23 at 3:00 pm, she said she had called hospice the night that Resident #186 fell because she had wanted to send him to the emergency room because the wound continued to bleed, but hospice said that they were against sending him out unless the wife wanted to send him out. She said she spoke to the sister-in-law and notified her of his condition regarding the contusion and that it continued to bleed, but she said to just monitor him for now. She said she did not notify the physician because it was their policy to notify hospice for hospice residents. Record review of a facility policy titled Falls - Clinical Protocol dated 2001, with revision date of March, 2018, indicated .the nurse shall assess and document/report the following: .recent injury, especially fracture or head injury .neurological status . and .the physician will identify medical conditions .and the risk for significant complications of falls (for example .increased risk of bleeding in someone taking an anticoagulant) . and .The staff, along with the physician's guidance, will follow up on any fall with associated injury until the resident is stable and delayed complications such as .subdural hematoma have been ruled out or resolved . Record review of a facility policy titled Change in a Resident's Condition or Status dated 2001, with revision date of February 2021 indicated .the nurse will notify the resident's attending physician or physician on call when there has been a(an): .significant change in the resident's physical/emotional/mental condition . This was determined to be an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 07/12/23 at 11:15 am. The Administrator was notified. The Administrator was provided with the IJ template on 07/12/23 at 11:30 am. The facility's plan of removal was accepted on 7/13/23 at 9:05 am and included: 1) All nursing staff will be in serviced over physician notification regarding change in assessment per policy and procedure. Inservice to include: 2) Notification-Change of Condition - in service completed by RDC (regional director of clinical and/or nursing administration designee once trained. All abnormal findings including change of vital signs, change of mobility, change of mental status, and/or decline in ADL's must be reported to the Medical Director (regardless of hospice physician notification), Director of Nursing, Assistant Director of Nursing, Administrator, and Responsible Representative/Emergency Contact immediately. Notification to physician regarding fall with or without injury. Notification to physician regarding blood thinners as applicable on active orders or medications with anticoagulant similarities on active orders. To assess baseline, the Charge Nurse may utilize previous assessment and/or the comprehensive care plan in Point Click Care. Progress notes must reflect the changes observed, interventions, and notification. Neuro Checks - RDC regional director of clinical and/or nursing administration designee once trained. Post fall neuros must be conducted for 30 hours. ? Q 15 minutes for a duration of 1 hour ? Q 30 minutes for a duration of 1 hour ? Q 1 hour for a duration of 4 hours ? Q 4 hours for a duration of 24 hours All neuros MUST be completed for falls with head injury and unwitnessed fall. Abnormal findings will be reported to Medical Director (regardless of hospice physician notification), Director of Nursing, and Assistant Director of Nursing; and will be extended for an additional 24 hours to be monitored Q 4 hours (unless otherwise directed by physician). Review & Reporting - -in-service completed by RDC (regional director of clinical) on 8/12/23. The Administrator and DON, along with IDT will review each incident in the Stand Up meeting to determine possible cause, interventions, documentation, follow-up, and reporting status according to HHSC reporting guidelines. All residents have the potential to be affected by this alleged deficient practice. The Medical Director was initially made aware of the immediate jeopardy 7/12/23 and has been involved in the development of the plan to removal. These conversations are considered a part of the QA process. To monitor for compliance the Administrator and/or designee will review all Accident/Incident reports and follow up accordingly. The IDT will review and assess the Accident/Incident to determine what further actions if needed are necessary. Members of this meeting are to include the Administrator, Director of Nursing, Assistant Director of Nursing, MDS Coordinator, Social Worker, and Therapy Representative. In addition, designated members of the corporate staff will review all Accident/Incidents daily for 6 months and reevaluate the need for continued review. Any negative findings will be forwarded to the Administrator and the QA committee. This plan was initially implemented 7/12/23 and will be monitored through completion by corporate and regional staff. Plan of Removal completion date is 7/12/23 by 8:00 pm with continued follow up for oncoming staff. Verification of POR: Verified MDS and Corporate MDS completed a review of all residents fall assessments completed in the last quarter for current interventions and effectiveness with completion date 7/12/23 at 8:00 pm Staff interviews 7/13/23 10:45 am-2:50 pm completed with DON, ADON, and RN F were able to verbalize the Fall/Interventions/Documentation policy including neuro checks, documentation of incident, notification to physician, specific interventions, and monitoring or resident condition; Resident assessment and fall documentation policy and procedure; Neuro checks policy including must be conducted for 30 hours, Q 15 minutes for 1 hour, Q 30 minutes for 1 hour, Q 1 hour for 4 hours, and Q 4 hours for 24 hours, abnormal findings will be reported to physician (regardless of hospice notification), DON, ADON, and will be monitored for an extended 24 hours; Notification of Change in residents condition to be reported to physician; notification to physician regarding blood thinners/anticoagulants as applicable. Admin, DON, ADON verbalized review and reporting procedures for daily stand-up meetings. Verified Medical director was notified of IJ and participated in POR. 7/12/23 QA meeting held with medical director and IDT members. On 7/13/23 at 3:35 pm, the facility was informed the IJ was removed. However, the facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of actual harm that is not immediate with a scope of isolated due to the facility's need to monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of their plan of removal and corrective actions.
CRITICAL (J)

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance wit...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's choices for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #186), reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to promptly identify and intervene for an acute change in Resident #186 following a fall resulting in him being transported to the hospital with bilateral subdural hematomas, which resulted in his death. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was identified on 07/12/23 at 11:15 am. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 11:30 am. While the IJ was removed on 07/13/23, the facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of actual harm that is not immediate with a scope of isolated due to the facility's need to monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of their plan of removal and corrective actions. This failure could place residents at the risk of not receiving appropriate medical interventions timely and effectively, which could result in severe illness, hospitalization or even death. Findings include: Record review of facility face sheet dated 7/12/23 for Resident #186 indicated that he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with subsequent readmission on [DATE] with diagnoses including: right sided hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction (right sided weakness/paralysis due to a stroke), aphasia (problems speaking), dysphagia (trouble swallowing), and type 2 diabetes. Record review of a comprehensive MDS dated [DATE] for Resident #186 indicated that BIMS was not done due to resident being rarely/never understood. Also indicated that he required supervision of 1 person for transfers, and extensive assist of 1 person for toileting. Record review of physician orders dated 7/12/23 for Resident #186 indicated that resident was receiving Aspirin 81mg 1 tablet 1 time per day and Clopidogrel Bisulfate 75mg 1 tablet 1 time per day (medications that can thin the blood causing easy bleeding and increasing risk for internal bleeding). Record review of electronic medical record for Resident #186 indicated that he was a DNR and had been receiving hospice services since 11/2/2022 for diagnosis of CVA (stroke). Record review of incident report dated 1/16/23 for Resident #186 indicated that he had suffered an unwitnessed fall resulting in large gash above right eye and swelling and bruising to right eye. Record review of a care plan, undated, for Resident #186 indicated he was at risk for bleeding and injury associated with daily use of anti-platelet (blood-thinning) medications (Clopidogrel). Record review of a facility 24-hour report dated 7/12/23 for the dates of 1/16/23 through 1/17/23 indicated that resident had fallen on 1/16/23 and neurological assessments were initiated immediately after fall. 24-hour report indicated that Resident #186's neurological assessment on 1/16/23 at 5:41 pm his CGS was 15 indicating mild head injury. At 6:12 pm on 1/16/23, his score was a 10, indicating a moderate head injury. There was no documentation of physician notification regarding this decline. Resident remained in facility and received no interventions. Record review of hospital paperwork in Resident #186's electronic medical record indicated that Resident #186 was admitted to ICU on 1/17/23 at 5:40 pm. Record review of progress note dated 1/19/23 indicated that resident readmitted to facility with diagnoses: right frontal intraparenchymal hemorrhage (a bleed that occurs within the brain parenchyma, the functional tissue in the brain); right temporal horn IVH (a bleeding into the brain's ventricular system, where the cerebrospinal fluid is produced and circulates through towards the subarachnoid space. It can result from physical trauma); bilateral subdural hematomas (a dangerous condition where blood collects under the skull, putting pressure on the brain and causing damage or death); left temporal horn IVH (a bleeding into the brain's ventricular system, where the cerebrospinal fluid is produced and circulates through towards the subarachnoid space. It can result from physical trauma). Record review of a progress note dated 1/21/23 for Resident #186 indicated that he passed away on 1/21/23 at 9:23 am. During an interview with DON on 7/11/23 at 4:00 pm, she said that she was not employed by this facility at that time but that she was employed by hospice services on 1/16/23. She said she had started as the facility DON in February 2023. She said she had come to the facility to assess Resident #186 on 1/16/23 and she noticed a change from his baseline, and he was unresponsive. She said she was unable to reach a family member to see what they wanted to do, so she had him sent out to the emergency room. She said in cases where she could not reach family members regarding hospice residents, she would use nursing judgement and sent out for evaluation. She said that any resident that suffered a fall with possible head injury should be sent out for evaluation. During an interview with Resident #186's family member on 7/11/23 at 4:34 pm, she said that the facility did notify her of the fall on 1/16/23 and that she had told them to send him to the ER if they thought he needed to go. She said she was under the impression that the nurse would use her judgement to decide if he needed to go. She said if she had known the severity of the situation, she would have insisted they send him out. She said once he was in the ICU at the hospital, the doctors there told her that he had five brain bleeds and there was nothing they could do. She said before the fall, he had been active and alert, he just was unable to speak due to a stroke. She said she had him sent back to the nursing facility because the hospital said they could not do anything for the bleeding on his brain. During an interview with physician office staff on 7/12/23 at 9:00 am, surveyor was informed that physician was not currently in office, but staff could take a message. Message left with return phone number for physician to call regarding incident on 1/16/23. No return call received from physician before exit from facility. During an interview with LVN L on 7/12/23 at 10:18 am, she said she had worked for the facility from November of 2022 to March of 2023. She said she had worked days in the unit and was working the day of the fall. She said she had been at the nurse's station and was notified by a CNA of the resident's fall. She said she did an assessment and took vital signs on Resident #186. She said around 3:30 pm, he was found laying on the floor and had been trying to get up on his own without assistance. She said that he fell in his room while ambulating unassisted, and he pointed to the bathroom to indicate he was trying to go to the bathroom. She said he had a gash on his forehead on the right side. She said she called the hospice nurse, and the DON at the time. She said the DON at that time came back to the unit and assessed the resident, cleaned his wound, and put steri-strips in place. She said he was not sent to the hospital. She said she was monitoring him every 30 minutes and the wound was still bleeding. She said she notified hospice again about the bleeding. She said she was doing neurological checks, checking pupils with her penlight, and checking his grips. She said his grips were strong. She said his pupils were not dilated; they were normal at 2mm. She said he was moving around a lot, acting restless, moaning, and groaning. She said she worked until 6 pm that evening. She said she had called and spoke to his wife and explained about the fall. She said their protocol was to notify hospice regarding incidents with any hospice residents and hospice would instruct on what to do. She said there were no in services done regarding the incident. During an interview with LVN C on 7/12/23 at 3:00 pm, she said she had called the hospice the night Resident #186 fell because she had wanted to send him to the emergency room due to the wound continuing to bleed, but hospice said that they were against sending him out unless the wife wanted to send him out. She said she spoke to a family member and notified them of his condition regarding the contusion and that it continued to bleed, but she said to just monitor him for now. She said she did not notify the physician because it was their policy to just notify hospice for hospice residents. Record review of a facility policy titled Falls - Clinical Protocol dated 2001, with revision date of March, 2018, indicated .the nurse shall assess and document/report the following: .recent injury, especially fracture or head injury .neurological status . and .the physician will identify medical conditions .and the risk for significant complications of falls (for example .increased risk of bleeding in someone taking an anticoagulant) . and .The staff, along with the physician's guidance, will follow up on any fall with associated injury until the resident is stable and delayed complications such as .subdural hematoma have been ruled out or resolved . Record review of a facility policy titled Change in a Resident's Condition or Status dated 2001, with revision date of February 2021 indicated .the nurse will notify the resident's attending physician or physician on call when there has been a(an): .need to transfer the resident to a hospital/treatment center . This was determined to be an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 07/12/23 at 11:15 am. The Administrator was notified. The Administrator was provided with the IJ template on 07/12/23 at 11:30 am. On 7/13/23 at 3:35 pm, the facility was informed the IJ was removed. However, the facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of actual harm with a scope of isolated due to the facility's need to monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of their plan of removal and corrective actions. The facility's plan of removal was accepted on 7/13/23 at 9:05 am and included: 1) MDS and Corporate MDS completed a review all residents fall assessments completed in the last quarter for current interventions and effectiveness with completion date 7/12/23 at 8:00 pm. 2) The in-services are as follows completed by RDC (regional director of clinical) and/or administrative nursing designee once trained. Falls/Interventions/Documentation Neuro checks must follow any unwitnessed fall or evidence of head trauma. Documentation of incident must be charted in the incident report, and must contain investigation of cause of fall, interventions to prevent further falls, assessment summary including injuries, vitals, and initiation of neuros indicated. Notification to physician regarding fall with or without injury. Notification to physician regarding blood thinners as applicable on active orders or medications with anticoagulant similarities on active orders. Specific interventions will be determined by the Charge Nurse and IDT team. These interventions will be reviewed, and the Care plan will be updated to reflect changes by MDS Nurse. The Administrator and IDT will review each fall, possible cause, and interventions for effectiveness-and change accordingly if not effectual. Nurse to monitor and document resident response to interventions on the Incident Report, and the MDS Nurse will update the Care Plan. Changes to be reported to Medical Director, Director of Nursing, Assistant Director of Nursing, Administrator, and Responsible Representative/Emergency Contact. Intervention review occurs daily in the morning Stand Up Meeting; and weekly in Standards of Care (SOC) with IDT. Changes will be noted in the progress note by the nurse; as well as the Stands of Care document. Residents at risk for fall will be identified utilizing the Fall Risk Assessment tool in Point Click Care (PCC) that is completed after any fall occurs, and quarterly. Resident Assessment - in service completed by RDC (regional director of clinical) and/or nursing administration once trained After all incidents the licensed nurse will completely fill out the incident report to include all portions of areas completed: o Nursing Description o Resident Description if applicable o Description of immediate action taken o Injuries observed o Pain Assessment o Mental status, o Mobility status, o Environmental factors, o Predisposing physiological factors, o Witness statements if applicable, o Agencies and people notified o Fall nurses note, o Fall risk assessment, o Neuros if applicable, o Administration of blood thinners review o Complete set of Vital Signs in the fall nurse note o Administer first aid if applicable. Change of Condition All abnormal findings including change of vital signs, change of mobility, change of mental status, and/or decline in ADL's must be reported to the Medical Director, Director of Nursing, Assistant Director of Nursing, Administrator, and Responsible Representative/Emergency Contact immediately. To assess baseline, the Charge Nurse may utilize previous assessment and/or the comprehensive care plan in Point Click Care. Progress notes must reflect the changes observed, interventions, and notification. Neuro Checks Post fall neuros must be conducted for 30 hours. ? Q 15 minutes for a duration of 1 hour ? Q 30 minutes for a duration of 1 hour ? Q 1 hour for a duration of 4 hours ? Q 4 hours for a duration of 24 hours All neuros MUST be completed for falls with head injury and unwitnessed fall. Abnormal findings will be reported to Medical Director (regardless of hospice physician notification), Director of Nursing, and Assistant Director of Nursing; and will be extended for an additional 24 hours to be monitored Q 4 hours (unless otherwise directed by physician). Review & Reporting-in-service completed by RDC (regional director of clinical) on 8/12/23. The Administrator and DON, along with IDT will review each incident in the Stand-Up meeting to determine possible cause, interventions, documentation, follow-up, and reporting status according to HHSC reporting guidelines. All residents have the potential to be affected by this alleged deficient practice. The Medical Director was initially made aware of the immediate jeopardy 7/12/23 and has been involved in the development of the plan to removal. These conversations are considered a part of the QA process. To monitor for compliance the Administrator and/or designee will review all Accident/Incident reports and follow up accordingly. The IDT will review and assess the Accident/Incident to determine what further actions if needed are necessary. Members of this meeting are to include the Administrator, Director of Nursing, Assistant Director of Nursing, MDS Coordinator, Social Worker, and Therapy Representative. In addition, designated members of the corporate staff will review all Accident/Incidents daily for 6 months and reevaluate the need for continued review. Any negative findings will be forwarded to the Administrator and the QA committee. This plan was initially implemented 7/12/23 and will be monitored through completion by corporate and regional staff. Plan of Removal completion date is 7/12/23 8:00 pm with continued follow up for oncoming staff. Verification of POR: Verified MDS and Corporate MDS completed a review of all residents fall assessments completed in the last quarter for current interventions and effectiveness with completion date 7/12/23 at 8:00 pm Staff interviews 7/13/23 10:45 am-2:50 pm completed with DON, ADON, and RN F were able to verbalize the Fall/Interventions/Documentation policy including neuro checks, documentation of incident, notification to physician, specific interventions, and monitoring or resident condition; Resident assessment and fall documentation policy and procedure; Neuro checks policy including must be conducted for 30 hours, Q 15 minutes for 1 hour, Q 30 minutes for 1 hour, Q 1 hour for 4 hours, and Q 4 hours for 24 hours, abnormal findings will be reported to physician (regardless of hospice notification), DON, ADON, and will be monitored for an extended 24 hours; Notification of Change in residents condition to be reported to physician; notification to physician regarding blood thinners/anticoagulants as applicable. Admin, DON, ADON verbalized review and reporting procedures for daily stand-up meetings. Verified Medical director was notified of IJ and participated in POR. 7/12/23 QA meeting held with medical director and IDT members. On 7/13/23 at 3:35 pm, the facility was informed the IJ was removed. However, the facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of actual harm that is not immediate with a scope of isolated due to the facility's need to monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of their plan of removal and corrective actions.
CRITICAL (K) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for 4 of 10 resid...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for 4 of 10 residents (Resident #12, Resident #184, Resident #185, and Resident #186) reviewed for Resident Abuse. 1. The facility failed to protect Resident #185 from abuse by Resident #2. On 11/22/2022 Resident #185 wandered by Resident #2's door on the secured unit, and Resident #2 grabbed Resident #185's arm and struck her in the upper chest. 2. The facility failed to protect Resident #185 from abuse by Resident #2. On 12/05/2022 Resident #185 wandered into Resident #2's room on the secured unit, and Resident #2 punched Resident #185 in the face causing an abrasion to her left check . 3. The facility failed to protect Resident #186 from abuse by Resident #2. On 01/15/2023 Resident #2 grabbed and yanked Resident #186's arm backwards. 4. The facility failed to protect Resident # 184 from abuse by Resident #2. On 03/04/2023 Resident #2 hit Resident #184 with an open hand on the left side of his face . 5. The facility failed to protect Resident # 12 from abuse by Resident #2. On 03/09/2023 Resident #12 wandered by Resident #2's door on the secured unit. and Resident #2 grabbed Resident #12's right arm pulling her to the floor. 6. The facility failed to protect Resident # 184 from abuse by Resident #2. On 04/27/2023 Resident #184 wandered into Resident #2's room on the secured unit and Resident #2 hit Resident #184 in the mouth . An IJ (immediate jeopardy) was identified on 07/11/2023 at 4:13 PM. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 4:13 PM. While the IJ was removed on 07/13/2023 at 3:35 PM, the facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of actual harm that is not immediate with a scope of pattern due to the facility's need to monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of their plan of removal and corrective actions. These failures placed all residents at risk of physical harm, mental anguish, emotional distress, or death. Findings included: 1. Record review of facility face sheet dated 7/11/2023 indicated Resident #2 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of bipolar disorder (mood disorder), psychosis (mental disorder), and anxiety. Record review of comprehensive MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident #2 had a BIMS of 99 indicating Resident #2 was unable to complete interview. Section C for cognition indicated Resident #2 had disorganized thinking. Section E for behaviors indicated Resident #2 had verbal behaviors directed toward others and resident had wandered. Record review of care plan dated 05/08/2023 indicated Resident #2 required psychotropic medications for diagnosis of behavior management, bipolar disorder, and psychosis. Resident #2 had impaired cognitive function and dementia or impaired thought processes related to dementia and psychosis and required the secured unit due to risk of elopement and wandering. Resident #2 had physical behaviors towards residents and staff with interventions added on 03/04/2023 to separate from resident and redirect to room, 3/09/2023 Seroquel increased, and 4/27/2023 resident #2 was sent to a Behavioral Hospital for evaluation and treatment. Record review of physician orders dated 7/11/2023 indicated Resident #2 had order for behavior monitoring, lorazepam 1 mg by mouth as needed for anxiety and Seroquel 100mg by mouth at bedtime. Record review of facility incident report dated 11/23/2022 revealed a resident-to-resident altercation that occurred between Resident # 2 and Resident #185. Resident #185 wandered by Resident #2's door on the secured unit, and Resident #2 grabbed Resident #185's arm and struck her in the upper chest. Resident #185 was removed from area, the responsible parties, physician, and administrator was notified. Record review of facility progress note dated 11/22/2023 at 6:18 pm stated LVN P was called to Resident #2's room by the aide working on the unit and the aide reported Resident #185 was walking by Resident #2's room when he grabbed Resident #185's arm and hit her in the chest before the aide was able to intervene. The aide separated the resident's and nurse notified the administrator. The administrator said an incident report was not needed due to resident's mental status. Record review of a facility progress note dated 12/05/2022 at 3:14 pm LVN L stated Resident #185 entered Resident #2's room, stooped down towards his face and Resident#2 punched Resident #185 on the left side of the face. Resident #185 was redirected and continue to monitor for behaviors. Record review of incident report log from November 2022 to present date and no incident recorded on 12/05/2022 regarding incident between Resident #2 and Resident #185. Record review of incident report dated 01/15/2023 stated Resident #2 rolled up to Resident #186 at the dining table and Resident #2 pulled, twisted, and yanked Resident #186's right arm. CNA A attempted to separate the residents and Resident #2 punched CNA A in the jaw. Administrator and physician were notified. Record review facility progress note dated 01/15/2023 at 11:33 am LVN P stated upon entering the unit, was notified Resident #2 had attacked Resident #186 and CNA A. Record review of incident report dated 03/04/2023 stated Resident #2 hit Resident#184 with an open hand on the left side of the face. Residents were separated and head to toe assessment completed. DON, physician, and families notified. Record review of progress note dated 03/05/2023 at 2:54 am stated LVN C was notified by RA assigned to the unit; Resident #2 had hit Resident #184 with an open hand to the left side of the face when Resident #184 had gotten to close to Resident #2. RA was advised to do frequent monitoring and hallway checks. Record review of incident report dated 03/09/2023 stated Resident #2 grabbed Resident #12 by the right arm and pulled her to the floor in the hallway. Head to toe assessment complete, physician, DON, and families notified. Record review of progress note dated 03/09/2023 at 4:36 am stated LVN C was notified by RA assigned to the unit Resident #12 was on the floor. RA reported that Resident #2 was sitting in the hallway when Resident #12 attempted to wander into Resident #2's room. Resident #2 grabbed Resident #12 by the right forearm pulling her to the floor. Head to toe assessment completed with no injuries noted to Resident #12. Resident #2 was redirected into his room and assisted to bed. Record review of incident report dated 4/27/2023 stated Resident #2 hit Resident #184. Resident #2 was noted to have two skin tears on his right knuckle. The CNA assigned to the unit reports when she was coming up the hall she noticed Resident #184 was no longer at the dining table. She then heard Resident #2 yelling from his room and when she entered the Resident #2's room, Resident #184 was sitting in a chair and had blood coming from his mouth on the left side. Both residents separated, assessed for injuries, Resident #2 placed on every 15-minute checks and referral sent to a behavioral hospital. Physician, Administrator, DON and families notified. 2. Record review of facility face sheet dated 7/11/2023 indicated Resident #12 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility 9/19/2020 with the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. Record review of quarterly MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident #12 had a BIMS of 99 indicating Resident #12 was unable to complete the interview. Section E for behaviors indicated Resident #12 wandered daily. Record review of comprehensive care plan dated 4/25/2023 indicated Resident #12 required secured unit placement due to elopement risk and Resident #12 had potential to demonstrate physical behaviors with interventions to analyze what deescalates behavior and document and intervene before agitation escalates. Record review of incident report dated 03/09/2023 stated Resident #12 was grabbed by the right arm and pulled to the floor by Resident #2 in the hallway. Head to toe assessment complete, physician, DON, and families notified. Record review of progress note dated 03/09/2023 at 5:20 am stated LVN C was notified by RA assigned to the unit Resident #12 was on the floor. RA reported that Resident #12 attempted to wander into Resident #2's room. Resident #2 grabbed Resident #12 by the right forearm pulling her to the floor. Head to toe assessment completed with no injuries noted to Resident #12. 3.Record review of facility face sheet dated 7/12/2023 indicated Resident #184 was an [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. Record review of admission MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident #184 had a BIMS of 99 indicating Resident #184 was unable to complete the interview. Section E for behaviors indicated verbal behaviors directed towards others and wandered daily. Record review of comprehensive care plan dated 02/26/2023 indicated Resident # 184 had a potential to demonstrate physical behaviors with interventions to analyze triggers and what de-escalates behaviors and document and was an elopement risk requiring a secured unit. Record review of nurse progress note dated 3/05/2023 at 2:15 am stated LVN C was notified by RA assigned to the unit Resident #184 had been hit to the left side of the face with an open hand by Resident #2. CNA was advised to do frequent checks on Resident #184 and monitor the hallway. Responsible party, DON, ADON and physician notified. Record review of nurse progress note dated 4/28/2023 at 3:57 pm stated ADON was alerted by CNA assigned to the unit that Resident #2 had hit Resident #184. ADON entered the unit and Resident #184 was standing in the hall with the CNA and had a gash and blood to left side of his mouth. 4. Record review of facility face sheet dated 7/12/2023 indicated Resident #185 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. Record review of admission MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident #185 had a BIMS of 01 indicating severe cognitive deficit. Section E for behaviors indicated Resident # 185 had physical behavioral symptoms directed towards others and had wandered. Record review of comprehensive care plan dated 11/16/2022 indicated Resident #185 had potential for psychosocial problem and required secured unit and was an elopement risk for wandering. Record review of nurse progress note dated 11/23/22 at 8:28 pm stated on 11/22/2023 LVN P was notified by the aide working the secured unit that Resident #185 was attempting to wander into Resident #2's room. Resident #2 grabbed Resident #185 by the arm and struck her in the chest twice before the aide could stop him. One on one care being provided to keep resident from wandering back into Resident #2's room until Resident #185 can be transferred to an all-female secured unit on Monday 11/28/2022. Record review of electronic health record for Resident #185 indicated no documentation of one-on-one monitoring initiated after incident on 11/22/2022. Record review of nurse progress note dated 12/2/2023 at 5:08 pm LVN C stated Resident #185 was hit in the face by Resident #2 causing an abrasion to her left cheek. On review, the dates documented for the incident for Resident #185 and Resident #2 do not match. No record of incident report found in the electronic health record. 5. Record review of facility face sheet dated 7/12/2023 indicated Resident # 186 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of hemiplegia following cerebral infarction (paralysis following a stroke). Record review of admission MDS 12/12/2022 indicated Resident #186 had moderately impaired cognition requiring supervision and wandered. Record review of comprehensive care plan dated 12/20/2022 indicated Resident # 186 had a communication problem and to provide a safe environment. Record review of Resident #186's electronic health record with no documentation related to altercation with Resident #2 on 01/15/2023. During an observation on 07/10/23 at 09:12 am CNA A and CNA B were present on the secured unit that housed 10 residents. During an observation on 7/10/2023 at 12:10 pm Resident #2 was up in his wheelchair in his room eating lunch. Resident #2 propels self in wheelchair and resides in a private room. During an interview on 07/10/2023 at 12:15 pm CNA A stated she had worked at the facility for 8 months and primarily was assigned to the secured unit. She stated the residents on the unit need supervision as they wander and get into things. She stated Resident #2 had been at the facility a long time and had a history of being aggressive if other residents entered his space. She stated she tried to keep everyone else away from him. She stated there was an incident when Resident #2 pulled another resident's arm in the dining room and when she intervened Resident #2 hit her. She stated the nurse was notified and Resident #2 returned to his room. She stated she had training on caring for residents with behaviors and incidents or abuse as to be reported to the nurse and administrator. During an interview on 07/10/20023 at 12:40 pm CNA B stated she had worked at the facility almost 2 years and worked the secured unit. She stated that during the day there are 2 CNAs on the unit and the nurse comes on and off the unit throughout the day. She stated that the residents on the unit have behaviors and she had been trained on how to control outburst but it does not always work. She stated Resident #2 did have some issues a few months ago but in the last few months had been better. She stated as long as no one messes with him he was fine. She stated there had not been any special interventions for Resident #2 and she just tried to keep an eye on him and prevent the other residents from going around him. During an interview on 7/11/2023 at 10:11 AM the RA stated he had been employed at the facility for 3 months part time. He said when he worked he worked all over the facility. He stated Resident #2 was on the secured unit and stayed in a wheelchair usually in his doorway of his room. He stated the incident with Resident #2 and Resident #184 he had worked that night and witnessed the incident. He stated Resident #184 walked up to Resident #2's wheelchair and Resident #2 hit Resident #184 in the face. He said he reported to the nurse LVN C and immediately separated both residents. He stated LVN C told him to write a witness statement and she called the hospice nurse. He stated he stayed in the hallway in the secured unit and put Resident #184 back to bed. He stated Resident #184 was a wanderer and he did not go back into the room of Resident #2. He stated LVN C checked on Resident #184 but could not recall any in-services or other interventions following that incident. He stated the incident with Resident #2 and Resident #12 was witnessed by him. He stated Resident #2 was sitting in the doorway of his room and Resident #12 went into his room but by the time he made it there, Resident #2 had already grabbed her by the arm and she fell to her knees. He stated Resident #12 jumped back up and he called to the nurse station to notify LVN C. He stated LVN C came and provided first aide to Resident 12's arm because she had a skin tear. He stated he was instructed by the nurse to write out a witness statement but no other special instructions were given. He said he had received training on abuse/neglect. He stated Resident #2 liked to sit in the doorway of his room and did not like other residents going in his room. He stated he was told by facility staff prior to working on the secured unit to monitor Resident #2 to ensure no residents entered his room. He stated at the time of both incidents, he was the only staff on the secured unit. He stated both incidents occurred on the night shift and usually there was only 1 aide on the unit at night. He stated the nurse stayed at the nurse station outside of the unit and they would come to the unit about 2-3 times a night. Attempted phone interviews on 7/11/2023 with LVN C at 10:34 am and at 4:43 pm with no answer and voicemail messages were left for a return phone call. During an interview on 7/11/2023 at 11:01 am the DON stated she had started as the facility DON in February 2023. She stated that when she first started she was told that resident to resident altercations was not abuse if it occurred between residents on the secured unit that had cognitive delays and did not have to be investigated or reported to the state unless the other resident suffered a significant injury. She stated she had knowledge of the altercations regarding Resident #2 and the nurse had notified her with each incident but had missed that the altercations were abuse. She stated the administrator was aware and he did not treat the altercations as abuse either. She stated that with each incident the aide separated the residents, the nurse was notified, and the victim was assessed. She stated she knew the facilities policy on abuse and the process of investigation and reporting but with the incidents that occurred since she had been DON with Resident #2 were missed. She stated in April her regional nurse notified her that all resident-to-resident altercations were to be investigated, reported and followed through to prevent further abuse. She stated by not following the abuse program the risk to the residents could be significant. During an interview on 7/12/23 at 7:32 am CNA D stated she had been a CNA for 6 years and employed at the facility for 2 months. She stated she worked all units and shifts. She stated on the night shift there was only 1 CNA and the nurse came back and forth as needed. She stated if a resident-to-resident altercation occurred on her shift she would report it to the nurse and separate the residents. She stated she was aware of each resident and their moods and Resident #2 prefers to stay to himself and no one be in his space. She stated at night when she worked on the unit by herself, if she was in another resident's room, she just tried to listen for any noise indicating a resident had gotten up or needed help. She stated she had not had any issues with any residents on the unit since starting to work at the facility. During an interview on 7/12/2023 at 7:48 am Resident #2 stated he did not remember any incidents occurring between him and another resident. He stated he was not sure how long he had been at the facility but there were a lot of people who lived there. He stated if someone were to come in his room that would be just fine but if they messed with him or his stuff he was not sure what he would do. He stated he was not a mean person and tried to get along with everyone. He stated he stayed in his room and kept to himself. During an interview on 7/12/2023 at 7:53 am CNA E stated she had been a CNA for 21 years and employed at the facility 6 months. She stated she was not working during any of the incidents with Resident # 2. She stated when she was hired she had to go through a full training program on the facilities computer-based training program before she could start to work. She stated the training included signs of abuse, types of abuse and reporting abuse to the administrator. She stated there was training on behavior monitoring and if there was an altercation between residents that they were to be separated and monitored to make sure the incident did not occur again. She stated the nurse was informed and the nurse did a report. She stated when she had worked the unit there were 2 CNA's working during the day. She stated if she and the other CNA were busy she would ask the nurse to come to the unit and help supervise if it was needed. She stated that if residents are not properly supervised and the abuse program was not followed a resident could get hurt. During an interview on 07/12/2023 at 8:01 am RN F stated she was new to the facility as of 2 weeks but had worked in long term care for over 20 years. She stated abuse training was completed when she was hired through the facilities online training program. She stated resident to resident altercations are to be reported to the abuse coordinator. The residents were to be separated, the victim assessed, and the perpetrator should be monitored 1 on 1 if needed. She stated she worked the secured unit and was on and off the unit throughout her shift and as needed by the CNA. During an interview on 7/12/2023 at 9:44 am, the Psychiatrist stated that residents that received hospice services were not typically seen by psychiatric services, but he did follow them if it was requested by the doctor or hospice. He stated he did complete an evaluation on Resident #2 on 7/11/2023 and with coordination of the son was able to develop a past history and adjust his diagnosis. He stated he did a medication review and made some adjustments with dose times of his antipsychotic and anxiety medications. He stated he would continue to monitor for any symptoms and make other adjustments if needed. He stated the facility had put in place one on one monitoring to monitor for any negative outcomes to his interventions. He stated he was going to provide the facility staff with more in-depth training today 7/12/2023 on how to care for aggressive residents, behavior monitoring and interventions, pharmacological interventions, and regulations for abuse. During an interview on 7/12/2023 at 10:05 am, the Administrator stated he had been at the facility since mid-December 2022 and was aware of each incident regarding Resident #2. He stated he monitored all incidents that occurred in the facility through the morning meetings. He stated he did not recognize that the incidents were abuse and because of that did not follow the facility abuse program in all aspects. At the time he did not see any risk to the residents but looking back now he could see the risk of injury to the other residents on the unit. He stated going forward he would follow the abuse program. During a phone interview on 7/12/2023 at 3:08 pm, LVN C stated she had been employed at the facility about 9 months but no longer was working at the facility. She stated she remembered the incidents between Resident #2 and Resident #184 and Resident #12. She stated Resident #2 was territorial and the staff tried to keep other residents out of Resident #2's room but at times she and the aides were busy with other task and could not keep their eyes on him all the time. She stated when Resident #2 hit Resident #184 she was notified by the CNA working the hall and she assessed both residents and there were no injuries. She stated she called the doctor, DON and each residents responsible person and notified them of the incident but did not do any special monitoring. She stated when Resident #2 grabbed and pulled Resident #12 to the ground, the CNA got her that time as well. She stated she assessed each resident and called the doctor, DON, and each residents responsible person. She stated Resident #2 and Resident #12 were separated and no other special monitoring was done. She stated the nights she worked at the facility there was only 1 CNA on the secured unit and she would go to the unit if needed. She stated she knew the types of abuse and resident to resident altercations was abuse. She stated when she was hired she was trained on abuse and to report abuse to the DON or abuse coordinator. Record review of facility in-service sign in sheet dated 1/15/2023 indicated a training on abuse and neglect and on 3/6/2023 training on abuse and neglect, types, reporting, policy, and abuse coordinator. Record review of facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program dated April 2021 indicated, .Residents have the right to be free from abuse. 1. protect residents from abuse, 2. develop and implement policies and protocols to prevent and identify abuse, 3. ensure adequate staffing, 8. identify and investigate all possible incidents of abuse, 9. Investigate and report any allegations within timeframe required by federal requirements, 10. protect residents from any further harm. Record review of facility policy titled Protection of Residents During Abuse Investigations dated April 2021 indicated, .3. if the alleged abuse involves another resident, there may be restrictions on the accused resident's freedom to visit other resident rooms unattended, 5. The victim is evaluated for safety, measures are taken such as more supervision. Record review of facility policy titled Identifying Types of Abuse dated April 2021 indicated, .5. Physical abuse includes but is not limited to hitting, slapping, punching. Record review of facility policy titled Abuse and Neglect Clinical Protocol dated March 2018 indicated, .The staff will investigate alleged abuse, the facility management will institute measures to address the needs of residents and minimize the possibility of abuse, the management will address situations of suspected or identified abuse and report them in a timely manner, and the staff and physician will monitor individuals who have been abused to address any issues regarding their medical condition, mood and function. Record review of facility policy titled Coordinating/Implementing Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation indicated, .the administrator is responsible for the overall coordination and implementation of the facility's policies and procedures against abuse. 1. Policies are in place that: a. prohibit and prevent resident abuse, b. establish processes to investigate such allegations, 2. policies address the following as part of abuse: c. prevention, d. identification of violations, e. investigative processes, f. protection of residents during investigations, g. reporting of and response to investigations, 3. the administrator has the overall responsibility for the coordination and implementation for facility's policies and procedures. Record review of facility policy titled Resident-to-Resident Altercations dated September 2022 indicated, .1.facility staff monitor residents for aggressive behaviors towards other residents, 3. Occurrences of such incidents are promptly reported to the nurse supervisor, DON, and administrator. The administrator will report the incident in accordance with the criteria established under Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation - Reporting and Investigating, 4. If two residents are involved in an altercation staff: a. separate the residents b. identify what happened c. notify each resident's representative and the attending physician d. review the event with the DON e. consult the attending physician f. make changes to care plan if necessary g. document in the resident's clinical record h. consult psychiatric services as needed i. complete a report of Incident/Accident form j. report the incident, findings and corrective actions to appropriate agencies.5. Inquiries concerning resident-to resident altercations are referred to the DON or the administrator. Record review of facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or misappropriation - Reporting and Investigating dated April 2021 indicated .All reports of resident abuse are reported to local, state and federal agencies and thoroughly investigated by facility management. 1. Resident abuse must be reported immediately to the administrator and to other officials according to state law, 3. Immediately is defined as within 2 hours of allegation involving abuse, 6. Upon receiving any abuse allegation the administrator is responsible for determining what actions are needed for the protection of residents. The facility Administrator was notified on 07/11/2022 at 4:13 PM that an Immediate Jeopardy situation had been identified due to the above failures and the IJ template was given at that time. The facility's plan of removal was accepted on 07/13/2022 at 3:35 PM and included: The facility will in-service all staff on abuse policy and procedure. To include types of abuse, reporting abuse, prevention of abuse, resident protection during abuse allegations and incidents, and signs and symptoms of abuse. Staff will be trained in de-escalation techniques and interventions to prevent resident to resident altercations. The facility will assess all residents on the secured unit for changes in their behavior monitoring or notations of emotional distress. The facility will in-service all staff on providing an environment free of hazards. The facility will have psychiatric service provider in-service the DON/ADON/RDC (regional director of clinical) on de-escalation techniques and protecting residents to provide to all staff. The facility will in-service all staff on abuse policy-protection, protecting residents from abuse from residents with history of multiple physical incidents and recognizing patterns of behaviors. The facility will in-service any agency staff on all related in-services before being permitted to work. The facility will complete an elopement assessment on Resident #2 to ensure that the resident still needed a secure unit. Resident #2 will be placed on Q15 monitoring until psychiatric telehealth review could be achieved. Resident #2 will be assessed via psychiatric telehealth services and placed on 1:1 to initiate nursing assessment review of psychiatric medication changes regarding behavior changes or safety measures because of these changes. A 30-day discharge will be initiated due to IDT determination. The facility will assign 1:1 designated staff to Resident #2 x 3 days following psychiatric evaluation. The facility will adjust staffing with the day shift having 2 nurse aides assigned to the secured unit and night shift having 1 nurse aide and 1 nurse assigned to the secured unit. Facility will complete weekly QAPI review pertaining to abuse/neglect and accident and incidents. The RDO (regional director of operations) will complete an in-service with the administrator and DON regarding abuse policy and procedure for types of abuse, reporting and investigating according to facility policies. The facility administrator or designee will monitor and review all Accident/Incident reports and follow up accordingly. The IDT will review and assess each Accident/incident to determine any further actions needed. IDT members to include the administrator, DON, ADON, MDS coordinator, Social Worker, and therapy representative. The corporate staff will review all incident/accidents daily for 6 months and reevaluate the need for continued review. On 07/13/2023, the surveyors confirmed the facility implemented their plan of removal sufficiently to remove the Immediate Jeopardy by: During an observation on 7/12/2023 at 7:40 am Resident #2 was up in his wheelchair eating breakfast with a facility staff present in room for 1 on 1 monitoring. During an interview on 7/12/2023 at 7:43 am laundry aide O stated she worked at the facility in laundry but was asked to sit and provide 1 on 1 supervision to Resident #2 to prevent any altercations with other residents. During an observation on 7/12/23 at 3:10 pm 1:1 sitter present with Resident #2 in his room. During an observation on 7/13/23 at 7:25 am and 1:10 pm 1:1 sitter present with Resident #2. Staff interviews on 7/13/2023 10:45-2:50 pm completed with Administrator, DON, ADON, BOM, Activity Director, Housekeeping Supervisor, MDS coordinator, Maintenance supervisor, DM, dietary cook, CNA A, CNA E, CNA I, CNA N, Restorative aide, transportation aide, LVN J, LVN M, RN F, HSK K, and laundry aide H was able to verbalize the abuse policy and procedure, de-escalation techniques, interventions to prevent resident to resident altercations, providing environment free of hazards, protecting residents and recognizing patterns of behaviors. The DON and administrator verbalized abuse policy, reporting and investigating per facility policies, and agency staff permitted to work after in-services received. During a phone interview on 7/13/2023 at 2:35 pm LVN M stat[TRUNCATED]
CRITICAL (K) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Abuse Prevention Policies (Tag F0607)

Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to implement written policies and procedures that proh...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to implement written policies and procedures that prohibit abuse/neglect for 4 of 10 residents (Resident #12, Resident #184, Resident #185, and Resident #186) ) reviewed for incidents. The facility failed to implement their abuse policy and program to prevent abuse when Resident #2 abused Resident #12, Resident #184, Resident #185, and Resident #186. An IJ (immediate jeopardy) was identified on 07/11/2023 at 4:13 PM. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 4:13 PM. While the IJ was removed on 07/13/2023 at 3:35 PM, the facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of actual harm that is not immediate with a scope of pattern due to the facility's need to monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of their plan of removal and corrective actions. These deficient practices affected all residents and contributed to further abuse. Findings included: 1. Record review of facility face sheet dated 7/11/2023 indicated Resident #2 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of bipolar disorder (mood disorder), psychosis (mental disorder), and anxiety. Record review of comprehensive MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident #2 had a BIMS of 99 indicating Resident #2 was unable to complete interview. Section C for cognition indicated Resident #2 had disorganized thinking. Section E for behaviors indicated Resident #2 had verbal behaviors directed toward others and resident had wandered. Record review of care plan dated 05/08/2023 indicated Resident #2 required psychotropic medications for diagnosis of behavior management, bipolar disorder, and psychosis. Resident #2 had impaired cognitive function and dementia or impaired thought processes related to dementia and psychosis and required the secured unit due to risk of elopement and wandering. Resident #2 had physical behaviors towards residents and staff with interventions added on 03/04/2023 to separate from resident and redirect to room, 3/09/2023 Seroquel increased, and 4/27/2023 resident #2 was sent to a behavioral hospital for evaluation and treatment. Record review of physician orders dated 7/11/2023 indicated Resident #2 had order for behavior monitoring, lorazepam 1 mg by mouth as needed for anxiety and Seroquel 100mg by mouth at bedtime. Record review of facility incident report dated 11/23/2022 revealed a resident-to-resident altercation that occurred between Resident # 2 and Resident #185. Resident #185 wandered by Resident #2's door on the secured unit, and Resident #2 grabbed Resident #185's arm and struck her in the upper chest. Resident #185 was removed from area, the responsible parties, physician, and administrator was notified. Record review of facility progress note dated 11/22/2023 at 6:18 pm LVN P stated was called to Resident #2's room by the aide working on the unit and the aide reported Resident #185 was walking by Resident #2's room when he grabbed Resident #185's arm and hit her in the chest before the aide was able to intervene. The aide separated the resident's and nurse notified the administrator. The administrator said an incident report was not needed due to resident's mental status. Record review of a facility progress note dated 12/05/2022 at 3:14 pm LVN L stated Resident #185 entered Resident #2's room, stooped down towards his face and Resident#2 punched Resident #185 on the left side of the face. Resident #185 was redirected and continue to monitor for behaviors. Record review of incident report log and no incident recorded on 12/05/2022 regarding incident between Resident #2 and Resident #185. Record review of incident report dated 01/15/2023 stated Resident #2 rolled up to Resident #186 at the dining table and Resident #2 pulled, twisted, and yanked Resident #186's right arm. CNA A attempted to separate the residents and Resident #2 punched CNA A in the jaw. Administrator and physician were notified. Record review facility progress note dated 01/15/2023 at 11:33 am LVN P stated upon entering the unit, was notified Resident #2 had attacked Resident #186 and CNA A. Record review of incident report dated 03/04/2023 stated Resident #2 hit Resident#184 with an open hand on the left side of the face. Residents were separated and head to toe assessment completed. DON, physician, and families notified. Record review of progress note dated 03/05/2023 at 2:54 am LVN C stated was notified by RA assigned to the unit; Resident #2 had hit Resident #184 with an open hand to the left side of the face when Resident #184 had gotten to close to Resident #2. RA was advised to do frequent monitoring and hallway checks. Record review of incident report dated 03/09/2023 stated resident #2 grabbed Resident #12 by the right arm and pulled her to the floor in the hallway. Head to toe assessment complete, physician, DON, and families notified. Record review of progress note dated 03/09/2023 at 4:36 am LVN C stated notified by RA assigned to the unit resident #12 was on the floor. RA reported that Resident #2 was sitting in the hallway when Resident #12 attempted to wander into Resident #2's room. Resident #2 grabbed Resident #12 by the right forearm pulling her to the floor. Head to toe assessment completed with no injuries noted to Resident #12. Resident #2 was redirected into his room and assisted to bed. Record review of incident report dated 4/27/2023 stated Resident #2 hit Resident #184. Resident #2 was noted to have two skin tears on his right knuckle. The CNA assigned to the unit reports when she was coming up the hall she noticed Resident #184 was no longer at the dining table. She then heard Resident #2 yelling from his room and when she entered the Resident #2's room, Resident #184 was sitting in a chair and had blood coming from his mouth on the left side. Both residents separated, assessed for injuries, Resident #2 placed on every 15-minute checks and referral sent to Behavioral Hospital. Physician, Administrator, DON and families notified. 2. Record review of facility face sheet dated 7/11/2023 indicated Resident #12 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility 9/19/2020 with the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. Record review of quarterly MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident #12 had a BIMS of 99 indicating Resident #12 was unable to complete the interview. Section E for behaviors indicated Resident #12 wandered daily. Record review of comprehensive care plan dated 4/25/2023 indicated Resident #12 required secured unit placement due to elopement risk and Resident #12 had potential to demonstrate physical behaviors with interventions to analyze what deescalates behavior and document and intervene before agitation escalates. Record review of incident report dated 03/09/2023 stated resident #12 was grabbed by the right arm and pulled to the floor by Resident #2 in the hallway. Head to toe assessment complete, physician, DON, and families notified. Record review of progress note dated 03/09/2023 at 5:20 am LVN C stated was notified by RA assigned to the unit Resident #12 was on the floor. RA reported that Resident #12 attempted to wander into Resident #2's room. Resident #2 grabbed Resident #12 by the right forearm pulling her to the floor. Head to toe assessment completed with no injuries noted to Resident #12. 3.Record review of facility face sheet dated 7/12/2023 indicated Resident #184 was an [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. Record review of admission MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident #184 had a BIMS of 99 indicating Resident #184 was unable to complete the interview. Section E for behaviors indicated verbal behaviors directed towards others and wandered daily. Record review of comprehensive care plan dated 02/26/2023 indicated Resident # 184 had a potential to demonstrate physical behaviors with interventions to analyze triggers and what de-escalates behaviors and document and was an elopement risk requiring a secured unit. Record review of nurse progress note dated 3/05/2023 at 2:15 am LVN C stated was notified by RA assigned to the unit Resident #184 had been hit to the left side of the face with an open hand by Resident #2. RA was advised to do frequent checks on Resident #184 and monitor the hallway. Responsible pat, DON, ADON and physician notified. Record review of nurse progress note dated 4/28/2023 at 3:57 pm ADON stated on 4/27/2023 at 5:18 pm was alerted by CNA assigned to the unit that Resident #2 had hit Resident #184. Nurse entered the unit and Resident #184 was standing in the hall with the CNA and had a gash and blood to left side of his mouth. 4. Record review of facility face sheet dated 7/12/2023 indicated Resident #185 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. Record review of admission MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident #185 had a BIMS of 01 indicating severe cognitive deficit. Section E for behaviors indicated Resident # 185 had physical behavioral symptoms directed towards others and had wandered. Record review of comprehensive care plan dated 11/16/2022 indicated Resident #185 had potential for psychosocial problem and required secured unit and was an elopement risk for wandering. Record review of nurse progress note dated 11/23/22 at 8:28 pm LVN P stated on 11/22/2023 at 3:30 pm nurse was notified by the aide working the secured unit that Resident #185 was attempting to wander into Resident #2's room. Resident #2 grabbed Resident #185 by the arm and struck her in the chest twice before the aide could stop him. One on one care being provided to keep resident from wandering back into Resident #2's room until Resident #185 can be transferred to an all-female secured unit on Monday 11/28/2022. Record review of electronic health record for Resident #185 indicated no documentation of one-on-one monitoring initiated after incident on 11/22/2022. Record review of nurse progress note dated 12/2/2023 at 5:09 pm LVN Q indicated Resident #185 was hit in the face by Resident #2 causing an abrasion to her left cheek. On review, the dates documented for the incident for Resident #185 and Resident #2 do not match. No record of incident report found in the electronic health record. 5. Record review of facility face sheet dated 7/12/2023 indicated Resident # 186 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of hemiplegia following cerebral infarction (paralysis following a stroke). Record review of admission MDS 12/12/2022 indicated Resident #186 had moderately impaired cognition requiring supervision and wandered. Record review of comprehensive care plan dated 12/20/2022 indicated Resident # 186 had a communication problem and to provide a safe environment. Record review of Resident #186's electronic health record with no documentation related to altercation with Resident #2 on 01/15/2023. During an observation on 07/10/23 at 09:12 AM CNA A and CNA B were present on the secured unit that housed 10 residents. During an observation on 7/10/2023 at 12:10 pm Resident #2 was up in his wheelchair in his room eating lunch. Resident #2 propels self in wheelchair and resides in a private room. During an interview on 07/10/2023 at 12:15 pm CNA A stated she had worked at the facility for 8 months and primarily was assigned to the secured unit. She stated the residents on the unit need supervision as they wander and get into things. She stated Resident #2 had been at the facility a long time and had a history of being aggressive if other residents entered his space. She stated she tried to keep everyone else away from him. She stated there was an incident when Resident #2 pulled another resident's arm in the dining room and when she intervened Resident #2 hit her. She stated the nurse was notified and Resident #2 returned to his room. She stated she had training on caring for residents with behaviors and incidents or abuse as to be reported to the nurse and administrator. During an interview on 07/10/20023 at 12:40 pm CNA B stated she had worked at the facility almost 2 years and worked the secured unit. She stated that during the day there are 2 CNAs on the unit and the nurse comes on and off the unit throughout the day. She stated that the residents on the unit have behaviors and she had been trained on how to control outburst but it does not always work. She stated Resident #2 did have some issues a few months ago but in the last few months had been better. She stated as long as no one messes with him he is fine. She stated there had not been any special interventions for Resident #2 and she just tried to keep an eye on him and prevent the other residents from going around. During an interview on 7/11/2023 at 10:11 AM the RA stated he had been employed at the facility for 3 months part time. He said when he worked he worked all over the facility. He stated Resident #2 was on the secured unit and stayed in a wheelchair usually in his doorway of his room. He stated the incident with Resident #2 and Resident #184 he had worked that night and witnessed the incident. He stated Resident #184 walked up to Resident #2's wheelchair and Resident #2 hit resident #184 in the face. He said he reported to the nurse LVN C and immediately separated both residents. He stated LVN C told him to write a witness statement and she called the hospice nurse. He stated he stayed in the hallway in the secured unit and put Resident #184 back to bed. He stated Resident #184 was a wanderer and he did not go back into the room of Resident #2. He stated LVN C checked on Resident #184 but could not recall any in-services or other interventions following that incident. He stated the incident with Resident #2 and Resident #12 was witnessed by him. He stated Resident #2 was sitting in the doorway of his room and Resident #12 went into his room but by the time he made it there, Resident #2 had already grabbed her by the arm and she fell to her knees. He stated Resident #12 jumped back up and he called to the nurse station to notify LVN C. He stated LVNC came and provided first aide to Resident 12's arm because she had a skin tear. He stated he was instructed by the nurse to write out a witness statement but no other special instructions were given. He said he had received training on abuse/neglect. He stated Resident #2 liked to sit in the doorway of his room and did not like other residents going in his room. He stated he was told by facility staff prior to working on the secured unit to monitor Resident #2 to ensure no residents entered his room. He stated at the time of both incidents, he was the only staff on the secured unit. He stated both incidents occurred on the night shift and usually there was only 1 aide on the unit at night. He stated the nurse stayed at the nurse station outside of the unit and they would come to the unit about 2-3 times a night. A phone call was attempted to LVN C on 7/11/2023 at 10:34 am and 4:43 pm with no answer and voicemail left. During an interview on 7/11/2023 at 11:01 am the DON stated she had started as the facility DON in February 2023. She stated that when she first started she was told that resident to resident altercations was not abuse if it occurred between residents on the secured unit that had cognitive delays and did not have to be investigated or reported to the state unless the other resident suffered a significant injury. She stated she had knowledge of the altercations regarding Resident #2 and the nurse had notified her with each incident but had missed that the altercations were abuse. She stated the administrator was aware and he did not treat the altercations as abuse either. She stated that with each incident the aide separated the residents, the nurse was notified, and the victim was assessed. She stated she knew the facilities policy on abuse and the process of investigation and reporting but with the incidents that occurred since she had been DON with Resident #2 were missed. She stated in April her regional nurse notified her that all resident-to-resident altercations were to be investigated, reported and followed through to prevent further abuse. She stated by not following the abuse program the risk to the residents could be significant. During an interview on 7/12/23 at 7:32 am CNA D stated she had been a CNA 6 years and employed at the facility 2 months. She stated she worked all units and shifts. She stated on the night shift there was only 1 CNA and the nurse came back and forth as needed. She stated if a resident-to-resident altercation occurred on her shift she would report it to the nurse and separate the residents. She stated she was aware of each resident and their moods and Resident #2 prefers to stay to himself and no one be in his space. She stated at night when she worked on the unit by herself, if she was in another resident's room, she just tried to listen for any noise indicating a resident had gotten up or needed help. She stated she had not had any issues with any residents on the unit since starting to work at the facility. During an interview on 7/12/2023 at 7:48 am Resident #2 stated he did not remember any incidents occurring between him and another resident. He stated he was not sure how long he had been at the facility but there were a lot of people who lived there. He stated if someone were to come in his room that would be just fine but if they messed with him or his stuff he was not sure what he would do. He stated he was not a mean person and tried to get alone with everyone. He stated he stayed in his room and kept to himself. During an interview on 7/12/2023 at 7:53 am CNA E stated she had been a CNA for 21 years and employed at the facility 6 months. She stated she was not working during any of the incidents with Resident # 2. She stated when she was hired she had to go through a full training program through the facilities computer-based training program before she could start to work. She stated the training included signs of abuse, types of abuse and reporting abuse to the administrator. She stated there was training on behavior monitoring and if there was an altercation between residents that they were to be separated and monitored to make sure the incident did not occur again. She stated the nurse was informed and the nurse did a report. She stated when she had worked the unit there were 2 CNA's working during the day. She stated if she and the other CNA were busy she would ask the nurse to come to the unit and help supervise if it was needed. She stated that if residents are not properly supervised and the abuse program was not followed a resident could get hurt. During an interview on 07/12/2023 at 8:01 am RN F stated she was new to the facility as of 2 weeks but had worked in long term care for over 20 years. She stated abuse training was completed when she was hired through the facilities Relias training program. She stated resident to resident altercations are to be reported to the abuse coordinator. The residents were to be separated, the victim assessed, and the perpetrator should be monitored 1 on 1 if needed. She stated she worked the secured unit and was on and off the unit throughout her shift and as needed by the CNA. During an interview on 7/12/2023 at 9:44 am the psychiatrist stated that residents that receive hospice services are not typically seen by psychiatric services but he did follow them if it was requested by the doctor or hospice. He stated he did complete an evaluation on Resident #2 7/11/2023 and with coordination of the son was able to develop a past history and adjust his diagnosis. He stated he did a medication review and made some adjustments with dose times of his antipsychotic and anxiety medications. He stated he will continue to monitor for any symptoms and make other adjustments if needed. He stated the facility has put in place 1 on 1 monitoring to monitor for any negative outcomes to his interventions. He stated he was going to provide the facility staff with more in-depth training today 7/12/2023 on how to care for aggressive residents, behavior monitoring and interventions, pharmacological interventions, and regulations for abuse. During an interview on 7/12/2023 at 10:05 am the administrator stated he had been at the facility since mid-December 2022 and was aware of each incident regarding Resident #2. He stated he monitors all incidents that occur in the facility through the morning meeting. He stated he did not recognize that the incidents were abuse and because of that did not follow the facility abuse program in all aspects . At the time he did not see any risk to the residents but looking back now he could see the risk of injury to the other residents on the unit. He stated going forward he would follow the abuse program. During a phone interview on 7/12/2023 at 3:08 pm LVN C stated she had been employed at the facility about 9 months but no longer was working at the facility. She stated she remembered the incidents between Resident #2 and Resident #184 and Resident #12. She stated Resident #2 was territorial and the staff tried to keep other residents out of Resident #2's room but at times she and the aides were busy with other task and could not keep their eyes on him all the time. She stated when Resident #2 hit Resident #184 she was notified by the CNA working the hall and she assessed both residents and there were no injuries. She stated she called the doctor, DON and each residents responsible person and notified them of the incident but did not do any special monitoring. She stated when Resident #2 grabbed and pulled Resident #12 to the ground, the CNA got her that time as well. She stated she assessed each resident and called the doctor, DON, and each residents responsible person. She stated Resident #2 and Resident #12 were separated and no other special monitoring was done. She stated the nights she worked at the facility there was only 1 CNA on the secured unit and she would go to the unit if needed. She stated she knew the types of abuse and resident to resident altercations was abuse. She stated when she was hired she was trained on abuse and to report abuse to the DON or abuse coordinator. Record review of facility in-service sign in sheet dated 1/15/2023 indicated a training on abuse and neglect and on 3/6/2023 training on abuse and neglect, types, reporting, policy, and abuse coordinator. Record review of facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program dated indicated, .Residents have the right to be free from abuse. 1. protect residents from abuse, 2. develop and implement policies and protocols to prevent and identify abuse, 3. ensure adequate staffing, 8. identify and investigate all possible incidents of abuse, 9. Investigate and report any allegations within timeframe required by federal requirements, 10. protect residents from any further harm. Record review of facility policy titled Protection of Residents During Abuse Investigations dated April 2021 indicated, .3. if the alleged abuse involves another resident, there may be restrictions on the accused resident's freedom to visit other resident rooms unattended, 5. The victim is evaluated for safety, measures are taken such as more supervision. Record review of facility policy titled Identifying Types of Abuse dated April 2021 indicated, .5. Physical abuse includes but is not limited to hitting, slapping, punching. Record review of facility policy titled Abuse and Neglect Clinical Protocol dated March 2018 indicated, .The staff will investigate alleged abuse, the facility management will institute measures to address the needs of residents and minimize the possibility of abuse, the management will address situations of suspected or identified abuse and report them in a timely manner, and the staff and physician will monitor individuals who have been abused to address any issues regarding their medical condition, mood and function. Record review of facility policy titled Coordinating/Implementing Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation indicated, .the administrator is responsible for the overall coordination and implementation of the facility's policies and procedures against abuse. 1. Policies are in place that: a. prohibit and prevent resident abuse, b. establish processes to investigate such allegations, 2. policies address the following as part of abuse: c. prevention, d. identification of violations, e. investigative processes, f. protection of residents during investigations, g. reporting of and response to investigations, 3. the administrator has the overall responsibility for the coordination and implementation for facility's policies and procedures. Record review of facility policy titled Resident-to-Resident Altercations dated September 2022 indicated, .1.facility staff monitor residents for aggressive behaviors towards other residents, 3. Occurrences of such incidents are promptly reported to the nurse supervisor, DON, and administrator. The administrator will report the incident in accordance with the criteria established under Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation - Reporting and Investigating, 4. If two residents are involved in an altercation staff: a. separate the residents b. identify what happened c. notify each resident's representative and the attending physician d. review the event with the DON e. consult the attending physician f. make changes to care plan if necessary g. document in the resident's clinical record h. consult psychiatric services as needed i. complete a report of Incident/Accident form j. report the incident, findings and corrective actions to appropriate agencies.5. Inquiries concerning resident-to resident altercations are referred to the DON or the administrator. Record review of facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or misappropriation - Reporting and Investigating dated April 2021 indicated .All reports of resident abuse are reported to local, state and federal agencies and thoroughly investigated by facility management. 1. Resident abuse must be reported immediately to the administrator and to other officials according to state law, 3. Immediately is defined as within 2 hours of allegation involving abuse, 6. Upon receiving any abuse allegation the administrator is responsible for determining what actions are needed for the protection of residents. The facility Administrator was notified on 07/11/2022 at 4:13 PM that an Immediate Jeopardy situation had been identified due to the above failures and the IJ template was given at that time. The facility's plan of removal was accepted on 07/13/2022 at 03:35 PM and included: The facility will in-service all staff on abuse policy and procedure. To include types of abuse, reporting abuse, prevention of abuse, resident protection during abuse allegations and incidents, and signs and symptoms of abuse. Staff were trained in de-escalation techniques and interventions to prevent resident to resident altercations. The RDO will in-service facility administrator regarding reporting abuse and neglect according to Provider Letter 19-17 and federal regulations. The facility will assess all residents on the secured unit for changes in their behavior monitoring or notations of emotional distress. The RDO will in-service all administrative staff regarding reporting guidelines. The facility will in-service all staff on providing an environment free of hazards. The facility will have psychiatric service provider in-service the DON/ADON/RDC (regional director of clinical) on de-escalation techniques and protecting residents to provide to all staff. The facility will in-service any agency staff on all related in-services before being permitted to work. The facility will complete an elopement assessment on Resident #2 to ensure that the resident still needed a secure unit. Resident #2 will be placed on Q15 monitoring until psychiatric telehealth review could be achieved. Resident #2 will be assessed via psychiatric telehealth services and placed on 1:1 to initiate nursing assessment review of psychiatric medication changes regarding behavior changes or safety measures because of these changes. A 30-day discharge will be initiated due to IDT determination. The facility will assign 1:1 designated staff to Resident #2 x 3 days following psychiatric evaluation. The facility will adjust staffing with the day shift having 2 nurse aides assigned to the secured unit and night shift having 1 nurse aide and 1 nurse assigned to the secured unit. The RDC (regional director of clinical) will in-service all licensed nursing staff over accidents and incident policy and procedure including investigating and documentation of events per facility protocol. All IDT members will be in-serviced on 24-hour report required review during stand-up meeting. The administrator, DON and ADON will review every incident report during the stand-up to ensure investigation, interventions and documentation is appropriate for resident safety and resident needs as applicable to prevent re-occurrence and provide protection. The facility will complete weekly QAPI review pertaining to abuse/neglect and accident and incidents. The facility administrator or designee will monitor and review all Accident/Incident reports and follow up accordingly. The IDT will review and assess each Accident/incident to determine any further actions needed. IDT members to include the administrator, DON, ADON, MDS coordinator, Social Worker, and therapy representative. The corporate staff will review all incident/accidents daily for 6 months and reevaluate the need for continued review. On 07/13/2023, the surveyor confirmed the facility implemented their plan of removal sufficiently to remove the Immediate Jeopardy by: During an observation on 7/12/2023 at 7:40 am Resident #2 was up in his wheelchair eating breakfast with a facility staff present in room for 1 on 1 monitoring. During an interview on 7/12/2023 at 7:43 am laundry aide stated she worked at the facility in laundry but was asked to sit and provide 1 on 1 supervision to Resident #2 to prevent any altercations with other residents. During an observation on 7/12/23 at 3:10 pm 1:1 sitter present with Resident #2 in his room. During an observation on 7/13/23 at 7:25 am and 1:10 pm 1:1 sitter present with Resident #2 in his room. Staff interviews on 7/13/2023 10:45-2:50 pm completed with Administrator, DON, ADON, BOM, Activity Director, Housekeeping Supervisor, MDS coordinator, Maintenance supervisor, DM, dietary cook, CNA A, CNA E, CNA I, CNA N, Restorative aide, transportation aide, LVN J, LVN M, RN F, HSK K, and laundry aide H was able to verbalize the abuse policy and procedure, de-escalation techniques, interventions to prevent resident to resident altercations, providing environment free of hazards, protecting residents and recognizing patterns of behaviors. The DON and administrator verbalized abuse policy, reporting and investigating per facility policies, and agency staff permitted to work after in-services received. During a phone interview on 7/13/2023 at 2:35 pm LVN M stated she worked the night shift and verbalized 1 CNA and 1 nurse were to reside on the unit at night. LVN M stated the other LVN was to cover the secured unit if she were to need to come off unit for a break. Record review of Resident #2's electronic health record indicated Resident #2 had an updated elopement risk completed, Q15 min checks were completed from 7/11/2023 at 4:30 pm until 7:00 pm and was seen by psychiatrist for evaluation on 7/11/23. Resident #2's medications were adjusted and 1 on 1 started 7/11/2023 at 7:15 pm to evaluate changes in behaviors and safety x 3 days. 1 on 1 to complete 7/15/23 with a reevaluation. Record review of psychiatric note dated 7/11/2023 indicated Resident #2 was evaluated[TRUNCATED]
CRITICAL (K)

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Investigate Abuse (Tag F0610)

Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to thoroughly investigate and take measures to prevent fur...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to thoroughly investigate and take measures to prevent further potential abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment while the investigation is in process, and failed to ensure corrective action was taken for 4 of 10 residents (Resident #12, Resident #184, Resident #185, and Resident #186) reviewed for abuse. 1.The facility failed to investigate allegations of abuse and ensure corrective actions were in place when Resident #2 hit Resident #185 in the chest on 11/22/2022. 2.The facility failed to investigate allegations of abuse and ensure corrective actions were in place when Resident #2 hit Resident #185 in the face causing an abrasion to her cheek on 12/05/2022. 3.The facility failed to investigate allegations of abuse and ensure corrective actions were in place when Resident #2 grabbed and yanked Resident #186's arm backwards on 01/15/2023. 4.The facility failed to investigate allegations of abuse and ensure corrective actions were in place when Resident #2 hit Resident #184 with an open hand on the left side of his face on 03/04/2023. 5.The facility failed to investigate allegations of abuse and ensure corrective actions were in place when Resident #2 grabbed Resident #12's right arm pulling her to the floor on 03/09/2023. An IJ was identified on 07/11/2023 at 4:13 PM. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 4:13 PM. While the IJ was removed on 07/13/2023 at 3:35 PM, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of pattern and a severity level of actual harm that is not immediate with a scope of pattern due to the facility's need to monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of their plan of removal and corrective actions. These failures placed all residents at risk of increased abuse, major injury and decreased quality of life. Findings included: 1. Record review of facility face sheet dated 7/11/2023 indicated Resident #2 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of bipolar disorder (mood disorder), psychosis (mental disorder), and anxiety. Record review of comprehensive MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident #2 had a BIMS of 99 indicating Resident #2 was unable to complete interview. Section C for cognition indicated Resident #2 had disorganized thinking. Section E for behaviors indicated Resident #2 had verbal behaviors directed toward others and resident had wandered. Record review of care plan dated 05/08/2023 indicated Resident #2 required psychotropic medications for diagnosis of behavior management, bipolar disorder, and psychosis. Resident #2 had impaired cognitive function and dementia or impaired thought processes related to dementia and psychosis and required the secured unit due to risk of elopement and wandering. Resident #2 had physical behaviors towards residents and staff with interventions added on 03/04/2023 to separate from resident and redirect to room, 3/09/2023 Seroquel increased, and 4/27/2023 resident #2 was sent to a Behavioral Hospital for evaluation and treatment. Record review of physician orders dated 7/11/2023 indicated Resident #2 had order for behavior monitoring, lorazepam 1 mg by mouth as needed for anxiety and Seroquel 100mg by mouth at bedtime. Record review of facility incident report dated 11/23/2022 revealed a resident-to-resident altercation that occurred between Resident # 2 and Resident #185. Resident #185 wandered by Resident #2's door on the secured unit, and Resident #2 grabbed Resident #185's arm and struck her in the upper chest. Resident #185 was removed from area, the responsible parties, physician, and administrator was notified. Record review of facility progress note dated 11/22/2023 at 6:18 pm LVN P stated the nurse was called to Resident #2's room by the aide working on the unit and the aide reported Resident #185 was walking by Resident #2's room when he grabbed Resident #185's arm and hit her in the chest before the aide was able to intervene. The aide separated the resident's and nurse notified the administrator. The administrator said an incident report was not needed due to resident's mental status. Record review of a facility progress note dated 12/05/2022 at 3:14 pm LVN L stated Resident #185 entered Resident #2's room, stooped down towards his face and Resident#2 punched Resident #185 on the left side of the face. Resident #185 was redirected and continue to monitor for behaviors. Record review of incident report log and no incident recorded on 12/05/2022 regarding incident between Resident #2 and Resident #185. Record review of incident report dated 01/15/2023 stated Resident #2 rolled up to Resident #186 at the dining table and Resident #2 pulled, twisted, and yanked Resident #186's right arm. CNA A attempted to separate the residents and Resident #2 punched CNA A in the jaw. Administrator and physician were notified. Record review facility progress note dated 01/15/2023 at 11:33 am LVN P stated upon entering the unit, was notified Resident #2 had attacked Resident #186 and CNA A. Record review of incident report dated 03/04/2023 stated Resident #2 hit Resident#184 with an open hand on the left side of the face. Residents were separated and head to toe assessment completed. DON, physician, and families notified. Record review of progress note dated 03/05/2023 at 2:54 am LVN C stated nurse was notified by RA assigned to the unit; Resident #2 had hit Resident #184 with an open hand to the left side of the face when Resident #184 had gotten to close to Resident #2. RA was advised to do frequent monitoring and hallway checks. Record review of incident report dated 03/09/2023 stated resident #2 grabbed Resident #12 by the right arm and pulled her to the floor in the hallway. Head to toe assessment complete, physician, DON, and families notified. Record review of progress note dated 03/09/2023 at 4:36 am LVN C stated nurse was notified by RA assigned to the unit resident #12 was on the floor. RA reported that Resident #2 was sitting in the hallway when Resident #12 attempted to wander into Resident #2's room. Resident #2 grabbed Resident #12 by the right forearm pulling her to the floor. Head to toe assessment completed with no injuries noted to Resident #12. Resident #2 was redirected into his room and assisted to bed. 2. Record review of facility face sheet dated 7/11/2023 indicated Resident #12 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility 9/19/2020 with the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. Record review of quarterly MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident #12 had a BIMS of 99 indicating Resident #12 was unable to complete the interview. Section E for behaviors indicated Resident #12 wandered daily. Record review of comprehensive care plan dated 4/25/2023 indicated Resident #12 required secured unit placement due to elopement risk and Resident #12 had potential to demonstrate physical behaviors with interventions to analyze what deescalates behavior and document and intervene before agitation escalates. Record review of incident report dated 03/09/2023 stated resident #12 was grabbed by the right arm and pulled to the floor by Resident #2 in the hallway. Head to toe assessment complete, physician, DON, and families notified. Record review of progress note dated 03/09/2023 at 5:20 am LVN C stated nurse was notified by RA assigned to the unit Resident #12 was on the floor. RA reported that Resident #12 attempted to wander into Resident #2's room. Resident #2 grabbed Resident #12 by the right forearm pulling her to the floor. Head to toe assessment completed with no injuries noted to Resident #12. 3.Record review of facility face sheet dated 7/12/2023 indicated Resident #184 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. Record review of admission MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident #184 had a BIMS of 99 indicating Resident #184 was unable to complete the interview. Section E for behaviors indicated verbal behaviors directed towards others and wandered daily. Record review of comprehensive care plan dated 02/26/2023 indicated Resident # 184 had a potential to demonstrate physical behaviors with interventions to analyze triggers and what de-escalates behaviors and document and was an elopement risk requiring a secured unit. Record review of nurse progress note dated 3/05/2023 at 2:15 am LVN C stated nurse was notified by RA assigned to the unit Resident #184 had been hit to the left side of the face with an open hand by Resident #2. RA was advised to do frequent checks on Resident #184 and monitor the hallway. Responsible parties , DON, ADON and physician notified. 4. Record review of facility face sheet dated 7/12/2023 indicated Resident #185 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. Record review of admission MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident #185 had a BIMS of 01 indicating severe cognitive deficit. Section E for behaviors indicated Resident # 185 had physical behavioral symptoms directed towards others and had wandered. Record review of comprehensive care plan dated 11/16/2022 indicated Resident #185 had potential for psychosocial problem and required secured unit and was an elopement risk for wandering. Record review of nurse progress note dated 11/23/22 at 8:28 pm LVN P stated on 11/22/2023 nurse was notified by the aide working the secured unit that Resident #185 was attempting to wander into Resident #2's room. Resident #2 grabbed Resident #185 by the arm and struck her in the chest twice before the aide could stop him. One on one care being provided to keep resident from wandering back into Resident #2's room until Resident #185 can be transferred to an all-female secured unit on Monday 11/28/2022. Record review of electronic health record for Resident #185 indicated no documentation of one-on-one monitoring initiated after incident on 11/22/2022. Record review of nurse progress note dated 12/2/2023 at 5:09 pm LVN Q indicated Resident #185 was hit in the face by Resident #2 causing an abrasion to her left cheek. On review, the dates documented for the incident for Resident #185 and Resident #2 do not match. No record of incident report found in the electronic health record. 5. Record review of facility face sheet dated 7/12/2023 indicated Resident # 186 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of hemiplegia following cerebral infarction (paralysis following a stroke). Record review of admission MDS 12/12/2022 indicated Resident #186 had moderately impaired cognition requiring supervision and wandered. Record review of comprehensive care plan dated 12/20/2022 indicated Resident # 186 had a communication problem and to provide a safe environment. Record review of Resident #186's electronic health record with no documentation related to altercation with Resident #2 on 01/15/2023. During an observation on 07/10/23 at 09:12 AM CNA A and CNA B were present on the secured unit that housed 10 residents. During an observation on 7/10/2023 at 12:10 pm Resident #2 was up in his wheelchair in his room eating lunch. Resident #2 propels self in wheelchair and resides in a private room. During an interview on 07/10/2023 at 12:15 pm CNA A stated she had worked at the facility for 8 months and primarily was assigned to the secured unit. She stated the residents on the unit need supervision as they wander and get into things. She stated Resident #2 had been at the facility a long time and had a history of being aggressive if other residents entered his space. She stated she tried to keep everyone else away from him because of his behaviors. She stated there was an incident when Resident #2 pulled another resident's arm in the dining room and when she intervened Resident #2 hit her. She stated the nurse was notified and Resident #2 returned to his room. She stated she had training on caring for residents with behaviors and incidents or abuse as to be reported to the nurse and administrator. During an interview on 07/10/20023 at 12:40 pm CNA B stated she had worked at the facility almost 2 years and worked the secured unit. She stated that during the day there are 2 CNAs on the unit and the nurse comes on and off the unit throughout the day. She stated that the residents on the unit have behaviors and she had been trained on how to control outburst but it does not always work. She stated Resident #2 did have some issues a few months ago but in the last few months had been better. She stated as long as no one messes with him he is fine. She stated there had not been any special interventions for Resident #2 and she just tried to keep an eye on him and prevent the other residents from going around him. During an interview on 7/11/2023 at 10:11 AM the RA stated he had been employed at the facility for 3 months part time. He said when he worked he worked all over the facility. He stated Resident #2 was on the secured unit and stayed in a wheelchair usually in his doorway of his room. He stated the incident with Resident #2 and Resident #184 he had worked that night and witnessed the incident. He stated Resident #184 walked up to Resident #2's wheelchair and Resident #2 hit resident #184 in the face. He said he reported to the nurse LVN C and immediately separated both residents. He stated LVN C told him to write a witness statement and she called the hospice nurse. He stated he stayed in the hallway in the secured unit and put Resident #184 back to bed. He stated Resident #184 was a wanderer and he did not go back into the room of Resident #2. He stated LVN C checked on Resident #184 but could not recall any in-services or other interventions following that incident. He stated the incident with Resident #2 and Resident #12 was witnessed by him. He stated Resident #2 was sitting in the doorway of his room and Resident #12 went into his room but by the time he made it there, Resident #2 had already grabbed her by the arm and she fell to her knees. He stated Resident #12 jumped back up and he called to the nurse station to notify LVN C. He stated LVN C came and provided first aide to Resident 12's arm because she had a skin tear. He stated he was instructed by the nurse to write out a witness statement but no other special instructions were given to him regarding preventing Resident #2 from further harming any other resident on the unit. He said he had received training on abuse/neglect. He stated Resident #2 liked to sit in the doorway of his room and did not like other residents going in his room. He stated he was told by facility staff prior to working on the secured unit to monitor Resident #2 to ensure no residents entered his room. He stated at the time of both incidents, he was the only staff on the secured unit. He stated both incidents occurred on the night shift and usually there was only 1 aide on the unit at night. He stated the nurse stayed at the nurse station outside of the unit and they would come to the unit about 2-3 times a night. A phone call was attempted to LVN C on 7/11/2023 at 10:34 am and 4:43 pm with no answer and voicemail left. During an interview on 7/11/2023 at 11:01 am the DON stated she had started as the facility DON in February 2023. She stated that when she first started she was told that resident to resident altercations was not abuse if it occurred between residents on the secured unit that had cognitive delays and did not have to be investigated or reported to the state unless the other resident suffered a significant injury. She stated no actual measures or corrective actions had been in place to prevent Resident #2 for further harming the other residents on the unit until April when the regional nurse notified her that all resident-to-resident altercations are treated as abuse and had to be investigated. She stated the administrator was aware and he did not treat the altercations as abuse either. She stated that with each incident the aide separated the residents, the nurse was notified, and the victim was assessed. She stated she knew the facilities policy on abuse and the process of investigation and reporting but with the incidents that occurred before April 2023 the abuse policy was not followed. She stated by not following the abuse program the risk to the residents could be significant. During an interview on 7/12/23 at 7:32 am CNA D stated she had been a CNA 6 years and employed at the facility 2 months. She stated she worked all units and shifts. She stated on the night shift there was only 1 CNA and the nurse came back and forth as needed. She stated if a resident-to-resident altercation occurred on her shift she would report it to the nurse and separate the residents. She stated she was aware of each resident and their moods and Resident #2 prefers to stay to himself and no one be in his space. She stated at night when she worked on the unit by herself, if she was in another resident's room, she just tried to listen for any noise indicating a resident had gotten up or needed help. She stated she had not had any issues with any residents on the unit since starting to work at the facility. During an interview on 7/12/2023 at 7:48 am Resident #2 stated he did not remember any incidents occurring between him and another resident. He stated he was not sure how long he had been at the facility but there were a lot of people who lived there. He stated if someone were to come in his room that would be just fine but if they messed with him or his stuff he was not sure what he would do. He stated he was not a mean person and tried to get alone with everyone. He stated he stayed in his room and kept to himself. During an interview on 7/12/2023 at 7:53 am CNA E stated she had been a CNA for 21 years and employed at the facility 6 months. She stated she was not working during any of the incidents with Resident # 2. She stated when she was hired she had to go through a full training program on Relias before she could start to work. She stated the training included signs of abuse, types of abuse and reporting abuse to the administrator. She stated there was training on behavior monitoring and if there was an altercation between residents that they were to be separated and monitored to make sure the incident did not occur again. She stated the nurse was informed and the nurse did a report. She stated when she had worked the unit there were 2 CNA's working during the day. She stated if she and the other CNA were busy she would ask the nurse to come to the unit and help supervise if it was needed. She stated that if residents are not properly supervised and the abuse program was not followed a resident could get hurt. During an interview on 07/12/2023 at 8:01 am RN F stated she was new to the facility as of 2 weeks but had worked in long term care for over 20 years. She stated abuse training was completed when she was hired through the facilities Relias training program. She stated resident to resident altercations are to be reported to the abuse coordinator. The residents were to be separated, the victim assessed, and the perpetrator should be monitored 1 on 1 if needed. She stated she worked the secured unit and was on and off the unit throughout her shift and as needed by the CNA. During an interview on 7/12/2023 at 9:44 am the psychiatrist stated that residents that receive hospice services are not typically seen by psychiatric services but he did follow them if it was requested by the doctor or hospice. He stated he did complete an evaluation on Resident #2 7/11/2023 and with coordination of the son was able to develop a past history and adjust his diagnosis. He stated he did a medication review and made some adjustments with dose times of his antipsychotic and anxiety medications. He stated he will continue to monitor for any symptoms and make other adjustments if needed. He stated the facility has put in place 1 on 1 monitoring to monitor for any negative outcomes to his interventions. He stated he was going to provide the facility staff with more in-depth training today 7/12/2023 on how to care for aggressive residents, behavior monitoring and interventions, pharmacological interventions, and regulations for abuse. During an interview on 7/12/2023 at 10:05 am the administrator stated he had been at the facility since mid-December 2022 and was aware of each incident regarding Resident #2. He stated he monitors all incidents that occur in the facility through the morning meeting. He stated he did not recognize that the incidents were abuse and because of that did not follow the facility abuse program in all aspects. At the time he did not see any risk to the residents but looking back now he could see the risk of injury to the other residents on the unit. He stated going forward he would follow the abuse program. During a phone interview on 7/12/2023 at 3:08 pm LVN C stated she had been employed at the facility about 9 months but no longer was working at the facility. She stated she remembered the incidents between Resident #2 and Resident #184 and Resident #12. She stated Resident #2 was territorial and the staff tried to keep other residents out of Resident #2's room but at times she and the aides were busy with other task and could not keep their eyes on him all the time. She stated when Resident #2 hit Resident #184 she was notified by the CNA working the hall and she assessed both residents and there were no injuries. She stated she called the doctor, DON and each residents responsible person and notified them of the incident but did not do any special monitoring. She stated when Resident #2 grabbed and pulled Resident #12 to the ground, the CNA got her that time as well. She stated she assessed each resident and called the doctor, DON, and each residents responsible person. She stated Resident #2 and Resident #12 were separated and no other special monitoring was done. She stated the nights she worked at the facility there was only 1 CNA on the secured unit and she would go to the unit if needed. She stated she knew the types of abuse and resident to resident altercations was abuse. She stated when she was hired she was trained on abuse and to report abuse to the DON or abuse coordinator. Record review of facility in-service sign in sheet dated 1/15/2023 indicated a training on abuse and neglect and on 3/6/2023 training on abuse and neglect, types, reporting, policy, and abuse coordinator. Record review of facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program dated indicated, .Residents have the right to be free from abuse. 1. protect residents from abuse, 2. develop and implement policies and protocols to prevent and identify abuse, 3. ensure adequate staffing, 8. identify and investigate all possible incidents of abuse, 9. Investigate and report any allegations within timeframe required by federal requirements, 10. protect residents from any further harm. Record review of facility policy titled Protection of Residents During Abuse Investigations dated April 2021 indicated, .3. if the alleged abuse involves another resident, there may be restrictions on the accused resident's freedom to visit other resident rooms unattended, 5. The victim is evaluated for safety, measures are taken such as more supervision. Record review of facility policy titled Identifying Types of Abuse dated April 2021 indicated, .5. Physical abuse includes but is not limited to hitting, slapping, punching. Record review of facility policy titled Abuse and Neglect Clinical Protocol dated March 2018 indicated, .The staff will investigate alleged abuse, the facility management will institute measures to address the needs of residents and minimize the possibility of abuse, the management will address situations of suspected or identified abuse and report them in a timely manner, and the staff and physician will monitor individuals who have been abused to address any issues regarding their medical condition, mood and function. Record review of facility policy titled Coordinating/Implementing Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation indicated, .the administrator is responsible for the overall coordination and implementation of the facility's policies and procedures against abuse. 1. Policies are in place that: a. prohibit and prevent resident abuse, b. establish processes to investigate such allegations, 2. policies address the following as part of abuse: c. prevention, d. identification of violations, e. investigative processes, f. protection of residents during investigations, g. reporting of and response to investigations, 3. the administrator has the overall responsibility for the coordination and implementation for facility's policies and procedures. Record review of facility policy titled Resident-to-Resident Altercations dated September 2022 indicated, .1.facility staff monitor residents for aggressive behaviors towards other residents, 3. Occurrences of such incidents are promptly reported to the nurse supervisor, DON, and administrator. The administrator will report the incident in accordance with the criteria established under Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation - Reporting and Investigating, 4. If two residents are involved in an altercation staff: a. separate the residents b. identify what happened c. notify each resident's representative and the attending physician d. review the event with the DON e. consult the attending physician f. make changes to care plan if necessary g. document in the resident's clinical record h. consult psychiatric services as needed i. complete a report of Incident/Accident form j. report the incident, findings and corrective actions to appropriate agencies.5. Inquiries concerning resident-to resident altercations are referred to the DON or the administrator. Record review of facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or misappropriation - Reporting and Investigating dated April 2021 indicated .All reports of resident abuse are reported to local, state and federal agencies and thoroughly investigated by facility management. 1. Resident abuse must be reported immediately to the administrator and to other officials according to state law, 3. Immediately is defined as within 2 hours of allegation involving abuse, 6. Upon receiving any abuse allegation the administrator is responsible for determining what actions are needed for the protection of residents. The facility Administrator was notified on 07/11/2022 at 4:13 PM that an Immediate Jeopardy situation had been identified due to the above failures and the IJ template was given at that time. The facility's plan of removal was accepted on 07/13/2022 at 03:35 PM and included: The facility will in-service all staff on abuse policy and procedure. To include types of abuse, reporting abuse, prevention of abuse, resident protection during abuse allegations and incidents, and signs and symptoms of abuse. Staff were trained in de-escalation techniques and interventions to prevent resident to resident altercations. The facility will assess all residents on the secured unit for changes in their behavior monitoring or notations of emotional distress. The facility will in-service all staff on abuse policy-protection, protecting residents from abuse from residents with history of multiple physical incidents and recognizing patterns of behaviors. The facility will in-service any agency staff on all related in-services before being permitted to work. The facility will in-service all nursing staff over accident/incident policy and procedure including documentation of events per facility protocol with investigation and intervention review. All IDT members will be in-serviced on 24-hour report required review during stand-up meeting. The administrator, DON and ADON will review every incident report during the stand-up to ensure investigation, interventions and documentation is appropriate for resident safety and resident needs as applicable to prevent re-occurrence and provide protection. Facility will complete weekly QAPI review pertaining to abuse/neglect and accident and incidents. The RDO (regional director of operations) will complete an in-service with the administrator and DON regarding abuse policy and procedure for types of abuse, reporting and investigating according to facility policies. The facility administrator or designee will monitor and review all Accident/Incident reports and follow up accordingly. The IDT will review and assess each Accident/incident to determine any further actions needed. IDT members to include the administrator, DON, ADON, MDS coordinator, Social Worker, and therapy representative. The corporate staff will review all incident/accidents daily for 6 months and reevaluate the need for continued review. On 07/13/2023, the surveyor confirmed the facility implemented their plan of removal sufficiently to remove the Immediate Jeopardy by: Staff interviews on 7/13/2023 10:45-2:50 pm completed with Administrator, DON, ADON, BOM, Activity Director, Housekeeping Supervisor, MDS coordinator, Maintenance supervisor, DM, dietary cook, CNA A, CNA E, CNA I, CNA N, Restorative aide, transportation aide, LVN J, LVN M, RN F, HSK K, and laundry aide H was able to verbalize the abuse policy and procedure, de-escalation techniques, interventions to prevent resident to resident altercations, providing environment free of hazards, protecting residents and recognizing patterns of behaviors. The DON and administrator verbalized abuse policy, reporting and investigating per facility policies, and agency staff permitted to work after in-services received. Record review of in-service dated 7/11/2023 presented by DON revealed topic of Abuse/Neglect, resident to resident altercations and reporting, emotional assessments, abuse/neglect policy and procedures. The attendees included management staff, nurses, nurse aides, dietary staff, activity director, and BOM (business office manager). Record review of in-service dated 7/11/2023 and 7/12/2023 presented by RDO revealed topic of reporting and investigating incidents of abuse. The attendees included administrator, DON, management staff, nurses, CNA's, housekeeping, activity director, laundry staff, dietary staff, and maintenance. Record review of in-service dated 7/11/2023 and 7/12/2023 presented by RDO revealed topic of environment free of hazards, accident and incident policy, and investigating and documentation. The attendees included management staff, nurses, aides, dietary staff, laundry staff, activity director, housekeeping staff, and BOM. Record review of in-service dated 7/11/2023 and 7/12/2023 presented by RDC revealed topic of 24-hour report review during morning meeting. The attendees included IDT members. Record review of in-service dated 7/11/2023 and 7/12/2023 presented by RDO revealed topic of investigating and protecting residents from abuse. The attendees included administrator, DON, management staff, nurses, CNA's, housekeeping, activity director, laundry staff, dietary staff, and maintenance. Record review of in-service dated 7/12/2023 presented by RDC (regional director of clinical) revealed topic of incidents and accidents are to be reviewed daily. The attendees included DON, ADON, and administrator. Record review of communication note dated 7/11/2023 indicated the medical director was notified of IJ and participated in plan of removal. Record review of quality assurance meeting sign in sheet indicated meeting was held 7/12/2023 with the medical director and IDT (interdisciplinary team) members. Record review of electronic health record indicated 11 of 11 residents residing on the secured unit were assessed for changes in their behaviors and monitoring. On 07/13/2023 at 03:35 PM, the facility was informed the IJ was removed. However, the facility remained out of compliance at severity level of actual harm [TRUNCATED]
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0813 (Tag F0813)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain and ensure safe and sanitary storage of resi...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain and ensure safe and sanitary storage of residents' food items for 1 of 3 resident personal refrigerators reviewed for food safety (Resident #14). The facility failed to ensure the refrigerator for Resident #14 did not contain expired milk. This failure could place resident at risk for food borne illnesses. Findings include: Record review of Resident #14's face sheet dated 07/11/2023 revealed that he was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the most recent readmission of 07/09/2023 with diagnoses including: chronic kidney disease (kidney problems), urinary tract infection (infection in the bladder), basal cell carcinoma of skin (skin cancer). Record review of a Quarterly MDS Assessment for Resident #14 dated 07/03/2023 indicated a BIMS score of 12 meaning mild cognitive impairment. She requires extensive assistance with bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene. Supervision with locomotion and eating. Balance during transitions and walking indicated he was not steady, but able to stabilize without staff assistance and required a wheelchair mobility device. Record review of a care plan for Resident #1 dated 04/06/2023 Resident #14 requires supervision setup by staff participation to eat. During an observation and interview on 07/10/2023 at 09:57 AM, Resident #14 said she gets food and drinks from her personal refrigerator herself when she wants. Her personal refrigerator had a unopened 236ml boxed container for Dairy Pure 2% reduced fat milk with the expiration date of 07/02/2023, also a ¾ full half gallon of milk with the expiration date of 07/06/2023. When asked if staff checked her refrigerator, she said the staff cleans and takes care of the refrigerator for her. During an interview on 07/12/2023 at 08:30 am, the Administrator said housekeeping was responsible for cleaning out the resident refrigerators and making sure there is no expired food. He said he does not think there is a facility policy for personal refrigerators but will look. During an interview on 07/12/2023 at 08:30 am, the Housekeeping Supervisor said she has worked at the facility for 5 years, she said housekeeping has always been responsible for cleaning the personal refrigerators. She said she has a folder on her cleaning cart that has the refrigerator temperature logs. She said she was not sure how Resident #14's refrigerator was missed. She said the facility had cut housekeeping hours about 6 months ago, so she has 1 fulltime housekeeper, and she works on the floor cleaning. She said personal refrigerators are to be cleaned daily when the resident's room is cleaned. Record Review 07/13/23 08:24 AM of policy titled Refrigerated Storage revealed under dairy products: Milk, fluid-follow expiration date. Record Review 07/13/23 08:26 AM of policy titled Refrigerators and Freezers dated 2001 with a revised date of April 2006 revealed: 7. All food shall be appropriately dated to ensure proper rotation by expiration dates. Received dates (dates of delivery) will be marked on cases and on individual items removed from cases for storage. use by dates will be completed with expiration dates on all prepared food in refrigerators. Expiration dates on unopened food will be observed and use by dates indicated once food is opened. 8. Supervisors will be responsible for ensuring food items in pantry, refrigerators, and freezers are not expired or past perish dates. Supervisors should contact vendors or manufacturers when expiration dates are in question or to decipher codes. 9. Supervisors will inspect refrigerators and freezers monthly for gasket condition, fan condition, presence of rust, excess condensation, and any other damage or maintenance needs. Necessary repairs will be initiated immediately. Maintenance schedules per manufacturer guidelines will be scheduled and followed. 9. Refrigerators and freezers will be kept clean, free of debris, and mopped with sanitizing solution on a scheduled basis and more often as necessary. Record Review 07/13/23 08:48 AM of facility policy titled Nutritious Lifestyles potluck meals and foods from home dated 1/1/2018 revealed: Guidelines: 1. When outside foods are brought in to the facility by resident family or friends, it must be labeled to clearly distinguish it from the food purchased or prepared by the facility and stored separately from the facility's food by placing on a distinguished shelf, labeled bag, or in a bin labeled resident food with the resident name on the items. Foods must be dated with food safety guidelines followed.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitatio...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury for 4 of 10 residents (Resident #12, Resident #184, Resident #185, and Resident #186) reviewed for abuse and neglect. 1. On 11/22/2022 Resident #185 wandered by Resident #2's door on the secured unit, and Resident #2 grabbed Resident #185's arm and struck her in the upper chest. The incident was not reported to the state agency as required. 2. On 12/05/2022 Resident #185 wandered into Resident #2's room on the secured unit, and Resident #2 punched Resident #185 in the face causing an abrasion to her left check. The incident was not reported to the state agency as required. 3. On 01/15/2023 Resident #2 grabbed and yanked Resident #186's arm backwards. The incident was not reported to the state agency as required 4. On 03/04/2023 Resident #2 hit Resident #184 with an open hand on the left side of his face. The incident was not reported to the state agency as required 5. On 03/09/2023 Resident #12 wandered by Resident #2's door on the secured unit. and Resident #2 grabbed Resident #12's right arm pulling her to the floor. The incident was not reported to the state agency as required. This failure could place all residents at risk of emotional, physical, mental abuse and neglect. Findings included: 1. Record review of facility face sheet dated 7/11/2023 indicated Resident #2 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of bipolar disorder (mood disorder), psychosis (mental disorder), and anxiety. Record review of comprehensive MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident #2 had a BIMS of 99 indicating Resident #2 was unable to complete interview. Section C for cognition indicated Resident #2 had disorganized thinking. Section E for behaviors indicated Resident #2 had verbal behaviors directed toward others and resident had wandered. Record review of care plan dated 05/08/2023 indicated Resident #2 required psychotropic medications for diagnosis of behavior management, bipolar disorder, and psychosis. Resident #2 had impaired cognitive function and dementia or impaired thought processes related to dementia and psychosis and required the secured unit due to risk of elopement and wandering. Resident #2 had physical behaviors towards residents and staff with interventions added on 03/04/2023 to separate from resident and redirect to room, 3/09/2023 Seroquel increased, and 4/27/2023 resident #2 was sent to a Behavioral Hospital for evaluation and treatment. Record review of physician orders dated 7/11/2023 indicated Resident #2 had order for behavior monitoring, lorazepam 1 mg by mouth as needed for anxiety and Seroquel 100mg by mouth at bedtime. Record review of facility incident report dated 11/23/2022 revealed a resident-to-resident altercation that occurred between Resident # 2 and Resident #185. Resident #185 wandered by Resident #2's door on the secured unit, and Resident #2 grabbed Resident #185's arm and struck her in the upper chest. Resident #185 was removed from area, the responsible parties, physician, and administrator was notified. Record review of facility progress note dated 11/22/2023 LVN P stated the nurse was called to Resident #2's room by the aide working on the unit and the aide reported Resident #185 was walking by Resident #2's room when he grabbed Resident #185's arm and hit her in the chest before the aide was able to intervene. The aide separated the resident's and nurse notified the administrator. The administrator said an incident report was not needed due to resident's mental status. Record review of a facility progress note dated 12/05/2022 LVN L stated Resident #185 entered Resident #2's room, stooped down towards his face and Resident#2 punched Resident #185 on the left side of the face. Resident #185 was redirected and continue to monitor for behaviors. Record review of incident report log and no incident recorded on 12/05/2022 regarding incident between Resident #2 and Resident #185. Record review of incident report dated 01/15/2023 stated Resident #2 rolled up to Resident #186 at the dining table and Resident #2 pulled, twisted, and yanked Resident #186's right arm. CNA A attempted to separate the residents and Resident #2 punched CNA A in the jaw. Administrator and physician were notified. Record review facility progress note dated 01/15/2023 LVN P stated upon entering the unit, was notified Resident #2 had attacked Resident #186 and CNA A. Record review of incident report dated 03/04/2023 stated Resident #2 hit Resident#184 with an open hand on the left side of the face. Residents were separated and head to toe assessment completed. DON, physician, and families notified. Record review of progress note dated 03/05/2023 LVN C stated was notified by RA assigned to the unit; Resident #2 had hit Resident #184 with an open hand to the left side of the face when Resident #184 had gotten to close to Resident #2. RA was advised to do frequent monitoring and hallway checks. Record review of incident report dated 03/09/2023 stated resident #2 grabbed Resident #12 by the right arm and pulled her to the floor in the hallway. Head to toe assessment complete, physician, DON, and families notified. Record review of progress note dated 03/09/2023 LVN C stated was notified by RA assigned to the unit resident #12 was on the floor. RA reported that Resident #2 was sitting in the hallway when Resident #12 attempted to wander into Resident #2's room. Resident #2 grabbed Resident #12 by the right forearm pulling her to the floor. Head to toe assessment completed with no injuries noted to Resident #12. Resident #2 was redirected into his room and assisted to bed. 2. Record review of facility face sheet dated 7/11/2023 indicated Resident #12 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility 9/19/2020 with the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. Record review of quarterly MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident #12 had a BIMS of 99 indicating Resident #12 was unable to complete the interview. Section E for behaviors indicated Resident #12 wandered daily. Record review of comprehensive care plan dated 4/25/2023 indicated Resident #12 required secured unit placement due to elopement risk and Resident #12 had potential to demonstrate physical behaviors with interventions to analyze what deescalates behavior and document and intervene before agitation escalates. Record review of incident report dated 03/09/2023 stated resident #12 was grabbed by the right arm and pulled to the floor by Resident #2 in the hallway. Head to toe assessment complete, physician, DON, and families notified. Record review of progress note dated 03/09/2023 LVN C stated nurse was notified by RA assigned to the unit Resident #12 was on the floor. RA reported that Resident #12 attempted to wander into Resident #2's room. Resident #2 grabbed Resident #12 by the right forearm pulling her to the floor. Head to toe assessment completed with no injuries noted to Resident #12. 3.Record review of facility face sheet dated 7/12/2023 indicated Resident #184 was an [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. Record review of admission MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident #184 had a BIMS of 99 indicating Resident #184 was unable to complete the interview. Section E for behaviors indicated verbal behaviors directed towards others and wandered daily. Record review of comprehensive care plan dated 02/26/2023 indicated Resident # 184 had a potential to demonstrate physical behaviors with interventions to analyze triggers and what de-escalates behaviors and document and was an elopement risk requiring a secured unit. Record review of nurse progress note dated 3/05/2023 LVN C stated nurse was notified by RA assigned to the unit Resident #184 had been hit to the left side of the face with an open hand by Resident #2. RA was advised to do frequent checks on Resident #184 and monitor the hallway. Responsible parties , DON, ADON and physician notified. 4. Record review of facility face sheet dated 7/12/2023 indicated Resident #185 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. Record review of admission MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident #185 had a BIMS of 01 indicating severe cognitive deficit. Section E for behaviors indicated Resident # 185 had physical behavioral symptoms directed towards others and had wandered. Record review of comprehensive care plan dated 11/16/2022 indicated Resident #185 had potential for psychosocial problem and required secured unit and was an elopement risk for wandering. Record review of nurse progress note dated 11/23/22 LVN P stated on 11/22/2023 at 3:30 pm nurse was notified by the aide working the secured unit that Resident #185 was attempting to wander into Resident #2's room. Resident #2 grabbed Resident #185 by the arm and struck her in the chest twice before the aide could stop him. One on one care being provided to keep resident from wandering back into Resident #2's room until Resident #185 can be transferred to an all-female secured unit on Monday 11/28/2022. Record review of nurse progress note dated 12/2/2023 LVN Q indicated Resident #1185 was hit in the face by Resident #2 causing an abrasion to her left cheek. On review, the dates documented for the incident for Resident #185 and Resident #2 do not match. No record of incident report found in the electronic health record. 5. Record review of facility face sheet dated 7/12/2023 indicated Resident # 186 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of hemiplegia following cerebral infarction (paralysis following a stroke). Record review of admission MDS 12/12/2022 indicated Resident #186 had moderately impaired cognition requiring supervision and wandered. Record review of comprehensive care plan dated 12/20/2022 indicated Resident # 186 had a communication problem and to provide a safe environment. Record review of Resident #186's electronic health record with no documentation related to altercation with Resident #2 on 01/15/2023. During an observation on 07/10/23 at 09:12 am CNA A and CNA B were present on the secured unit that housed 10 residents. During an observation on 7/10/2023 at 12:10 pm Resident #2 was up in his wheelchair in his room eating lunch. Resident #2 propels self in wheelchair and resides in a private room. During an interview on 07/10/2023 at 12:15 pm CNA A stated she had worked at the facility for 8 months and primarily was assigned to the secured unit. She stated the residents on the unit need supervision as they wander and get into things. She stated Resident #2 had been at the facility a long time and had a history of being aggressive if other residents entered his space. She stated she tried to keep everyone else away from him. She stated there was an incident when Resident #2 pulled another resident's arm in the dining room and when she intervened Resident #2 hit her. She stated the nurse was notified and Resident #2 returned to his room. She stated she had training on caring for residents with behaviors and incidents or abuse as to be reported to the nurse and administrator. During an interview on 07/10/20023 at 12:40 pm CNA B stated she had worked at the facility almost 2 years and worked the secured unit. She stated that during the day there are 2 CNAs on the unit and the nurse comes on and off the unit throughout the day. She stated that the residents on the unit have behaviors and she had been trained on how to control outburst but it does not always work. She stated Resident #2 did have issues a few months ago but in the last few months had been better. She stated as long as no one messes with him he is fine. She stated there had not been any special interventions for Resident #2 and she just tried to keep an eye on him and prevent the other residents from going around him. During an interview on 7/11/2023 at 10:11 am the RA stated he had been employed at the facility for 3 months part time. He said when he worked he worked all over the facility. He stated Resident #2 was on the secured unit and stayed in a wheelchair usually in his doorway of his room. He stated the incident with Resident #2 and Resident #184 he had worked that night and witnessed the incident. He stated Resident #184 walked up to Resident #2's wheelchair and Resident #2 hit resident #184 in the face. He said he reported to the nurse LVN C and immediately separated both residents. He stated LVN C told him to write a witness statement and she called the hospice nurse. He stated he stayed in the hallway in the secured unit and put Resident #184 back to bed. He stated Resident #184 was a wanderer and he did not go back into the room of Resident #2. He stated LVN C checked on Resident #184 but could not recall any in-services or other interventions following that incident. He stated the incident with Resident #2 and Resident #12 was witnessed by him. He stated Resident #2 was sitting in the doorway of his room and Resident #12 went into his room but by the time he made it there, Resident #2 had already grabbed her by the arm and she fell to her knees. He stated Resident #12 jumped back up and he called to the nurse station to notify LVN C. He stated LVN C came and provided first aide to Resident 12's arm because she had a skin tear. He stated he was instructed by the nurse to write out a witness statement but no other special instructions were given. He said he had received training on abuse/neglect. He stated Resident #2 liked to sit in the doorway of his room and did not like other residents going in his room. He stated he was told by facility staff prior to working on the secured unit to monitor Resident #2 to ensure no residents entered his room. He stated at the time of both incidents, he was the only staff on the secured unit. He stated both incidents occurred on the night shift and usually there was only 1 aide on the unit at night. He stated the nurse stayed at the nurse station outside of the unit and they would come to the unit about 2-3 times a night. A phone call was attempted to LVN C on 7/11/2023 at 10:34 am and 4:43 pm with no answer and voicemail left. During an interview on 7/11/2023 at 11:01 am the DON stated she had started as the facility DON in February 2023. She stated that when she first started she was told that resident to resident altercations was not abuse if it occurred between residents on the secured unit that had cognitive delays and did not have to be investigated or reported to the state unless the other resident suffered a significant injury. She stated she had knowledge of the altercations regarding Resident #2 and the nurse had notified her with each incident but had missed that the altercations were abuse. She stated the administrator was aware and he did not treat the altercations as abuse either. She stated that with each incident the aide separated the residents, the nurse was notified, and the victim was assessed. She stated she knew the facilities policy on abuse and the process of investigation and reporting but with the incidents that occurred since she had been DON with Resident #2 were missed. She stated in April her regional nurse notified her that all resident-to-resident altercations were to be investigated, reported and followed through to prevent further abuse. She stated by not following the abuse program the risk to the residents could be significant. During an interview on 7/12/23 at 7:32 am CNA D stated she had been a CNA 6 years and employed at the facility 2 months. She stated she worked all units and shifts. She stated on the night shift there was only 1 CNA and the nurse came back and forth as needed. She stated if a resident-to-resident altercation occurred on her shift she would report it to the nurse and separate the residents. She stated she was aware of each resident and their moods and Resident #2 prefers to stay to himself and no one be in his space. She stated at night when she worked on the unit by herself, if she was in another resident's room, she just tried to listen for any noise indicating a resident had gotten up or needed help. She stated she had not had any issues with any residents on the unit since starting to work at the facility. During an interview on 7/12/2023 at 7:48 am Resident #2 stated he did not remember any incidents occurring between him and another resident. He stated he was not sure how long he had been at the facility but there were a lot of people who lived there. He stated if someone were to come in his room that would be just fine but if they messed with him or his stuff he was not sure what he would do. He stated he was not a mean person and tried to get alone with everyone. He stated he stayed in his room and kept to himself. During an interview on 7/12/2023 at 7:53 am CNA E stated she had been a CNA for 21 years and employed at the facility 6 months. She stated she was not working during any of the incidents with Resident # 2. She stated when she was hired she had to go through a full training program on Relias before she could start to work. She stated the training included signs of abuse, types of abuse and reporting abuse to the administrator. She stated there was training on behavior monitoring and if there was an altercation between residents that they were to be separated and monitored to make sure the incident did not occur again. She stated the nurse was informed and the nurse did a report. She stated when she had worked the unit there were 2 CNA's working during the day. She stated if she and the other CNA were busy she would ask the nurse to come to the unit and help supervise if it was needed. She stated that if residents are not properly supervised and the abuse program was not followed a resident could get hurt. During an interview on 07/12/2023 at 8:01 am RN F stated she was new to the facility as of 2 weeks but had worked in long term care for over 20 years. She stated abuse training was completed when she was hired through the facilities Relias training program. She stated resident to resident altercations are to be reported to the abuse coordinator. The residents were to be separated, the victim assessed, and the perpetrator should be monitored 1 on 1 if needed. She stated she worked the secured unit and was on and off the unit throughout her shift and as needed by the CNA. During an interview on 7/12/2023 at 10:05 am the administrator stated he had been at the facility since mid-December 2022 and was aware of each incident regarding Resident #2. He stated he monitors all incidents that occur in the facility through the morning meeting. He stated he did not recognize that the incidents were abuse and because of that did not follow the facility abuse program in all aspects including reporting to the state agency. At the time he did not see any risk to the residents but looking back now he could see the risk of injury to the other residents on the unit. He stated going forward he would follow the abuse program. During a phone interview on 7/12/2023 at 3:08 pm LVN C stated she had been employed at the facility about 9 months but no longer was working at the facility. She stated she remembered the incidents between Resident #2 and Resident #184 and Resident #12. She stated Resident #2 was territorial and the staff tried to keep other residents out of Resident #2's room but at times she and the aides were busy with other task and could not keep their eyes on him all the time. She stated when Resident #2 hit Resident #184 she was notified by the CNA working the hall and she assessed both residents and there were no injuries. She stated she called the doctor, DON and each residents responsible person and notified them of the incident but did not do any special monitoring. She stated when Resident #2 grabbed and pulled Resident #12 to the ground, the CNA got her that time as well. She stated she assessed each resident and called the doctor, DON, and each residents responsible person. She stated Resident #2 and Resident #12 were separated and no other special monitoring was done. She stated the nights she worked at the facility there was only 1 CNA on the secured unit and she would go to the unit if needed. She stated she knew the types of abuse and resident to resident altercations was abuse. She stated when she was hired she was trained on abuse and to report abuse to the DON or abuse coordinator. Record review of facility in-service sign in sheet dated 1/15/2023 indicated a training on abuse and neglect and on 3/6/2023 training on abuse and neglect, types, reporting, policy, and abuse coordinator. Record review of facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program dated indicated, .Residents have the right to be free from abuse. 1. protect residents from abuse, 2. develop and implement policies and protocols to prevent and identify abuse, 3. ensure adequate staffing, 8. identify and investigate all possible incidents of abuse, 9. Investigate and report any allegations within timeframe required by federal requirements, 10. protect residents from any further harm. Record review of facility policy titled Protection of Residents During Abuse Investigations dated April 2021 indicated, .3. if the alleged abuse involves another resident, there may be restrictions on the accused resident's freedom to visit other resident rooms unattended, 5. The victim is evaluated for safety, measures are taken such as more supervision. Record review of facility policy titled Identifying Types of Abuse dated April 2021 indicated, .5. Physical abuse includes but is not limited to hitting, slapping, punching. Record review of facility policy titled Abuse and Neglect Clinical Protocol dated March 2018 indicated, .The staff will investigate alleged abuse, the facility management will institute measures to address the needs of residents and minimize the possibility of abuse, the management will address situations of suspected or identified abuse and report them in a timely manner, and the staff and physician will monitor individuals who have been abused to address any issues regarding their medical condition, mood and function. Record review of facility policy titled Coordinating/Implementing Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation indicated, .the administrator is responsible for the overall coordination and implementation of the facility's policies and procedures against abuse. 1. Policies are in place that: a. prohibit and prevent resident abuse, b. establish processes to investigate such allegations, 2. policies address the following as part of abuse: c. prevention, d. identification of violations, e. investigative processes, f. protection of residents during investigations, g. reporting of and response to investigations, 3. the administrator has the overall responsibility for the coordination and implementation for facility's policies and procedures. Record review of facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or misappropriation - Reporting and Investigating dated April 2021 indicated .All reports of resident abuse are reported to local, state and federal agencies and thoroughly investigated by facility management. 1. Resident abuse must be reported immediately to the administrator and to other officials according to state law, 3. Immediately is defined as within 2 hours of allegation involving abuse, 6. Upon receiving any abuse allegation the administrator is responsible for determining what actions are needed for the protection of residents.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pharmacy Services (Tag F0755)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that assures the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing and administ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that assures the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing and administering of medications for 1 of 1 medication storage room reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to properly date tuberculin PPD (purified protein derivative) Mantoux testing solution in the medication storage refrigerator with an open date. The facility failed to remove 3 vials of Flucelvax from the medication storage room refrigerator that had expired on 06/30/2023. These failures could place residents who receive medications at risk of not receiving the intended therapeutic benefit of the medications. Findings included: During an observation on 07/10/23 at 10:30 AM with LVN G the medication room refrigerator had 1 vial of Tubersol PPD with no open date and instructions to dispose of 30 days after opening and 3 vials of Flucelvax (influenza vaccine) with expiration date of June 30, 2023. During an interview on 07/10/2023 at 10:45 am LVN G stated that Tuberculosis skin test and Influenza vaccines were given by the nurses and it was each nurses responsibility to check the expiration date on all medicine before it was given. She stated multi-use vials were to be dated and they were usually only good for 30 days. She stated she had received training on multi use vials use by dates. She stated the risk could be ineffective medication. During an interview on 07/10/2023 at 10:55 am the DON stated the nurses were responsible for monitoring the medication refrigerator, removing expired medications and dating all multiuse vials when opened. She stated the nurses have had training and there was a book they could reference on the medication cart. She stated it was her responsibility to provide oversight but had not gotten around to checking the medication storage room. She stated the risk could be ineffective medication. During an interview on 07/10/2023 at 11:15 am the administrator stated the DON and ADON were responsible for medication storage and removing expired medications for destruction. He stated he was not sure how long multiuse vials were good for but if a resident were to receive expired medications it could not work or make them sick. Record review of nurse tool undated and titled List of Medications with Shortened Expiration Dates indicated, Tubersol beyond use date, 30 days after opening. Record Review of policy and procedure titled Storage of medications indicated, .4.Discontinued, outdated, or deteriorated drugs or biologicals are returned to the dispensing pharmacy or destroyed .
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and co...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 6 residents (Resident # 1 and Resident #17) reviewed for infection control. LVN J failed to clean the scissors used to cut wound care dressings for Resident #1 and she stored the scissors in her pocket. CNA I failed to change her gloves when going from dirty to clean while providing incontinent care for Resident #17. These failures could place residents at risk of exposure to communicable diseases and infections. Findings included: 1. Record review of an admission Record for Resident #1 dated 7/13/2023 indicated he admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was [AGE] years old with diagnoses of paraplegia (paralyzed in lower half of body), COPD (a group of diseases that cause airflow blockage and breathing problems), and major depressive disorder (persistent depressed mood and loss of interest in life). Record review of a physician order dated 7/5/2023 for Resident #1 indicated an order to cleanse ulcer to right gluteal cleft (butt crack) with wound cleanser, pat dry with 4 x4's, apply Santyl (removes dead tissues from wounds) and collagen (dressing that contains proteins the promotes skin growth), apply zinc to peri-wound (tissue surrounds a wound) and cover with foam dressing daily until resolved or treatment changed one time a day. Record review of a Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #1 indicated he did not have any impairment in thinking with a BIMS score of 15. He did not have any unhealed pressure ulcers/injuries. Record review of a care plan undated for Resident #1 indicated he had actual skin impairment related to wound to sacrum (bone in the lower spine that forms part of the pelvis) with interventions to cleanse ulcer to right gluteal cleft with wound cleanser, pat dry with 4x4's, apply Santyl and collagen, apply zinc to peri-wound and cover with foam dressing. During an observation on 7/13/2023 at 9:00 AM, LVN J was in Resident #1's room. She removed the dressing from Resident #1's buttocks and placed in in the trash. She removed her gloves and placed them in the trash and went into the restroom and washed her hands. She applied gloves to both hands and cleaned Resident #1's gluteal area with the gauze soaked in wound cleanser and placed the gauze in the trash. She patted the area dry with dry gauze and placed the gauze in the trash. She removed her gloves and placed them in the trash and washed her hands. She applied gloves and removed a pair of scissors from her pocket and cut the collagen dressing and applied to the wound bed with Santyl ointment and zinc to peri-wound. She completed the care and exited the room. During an interview on 7/13/2023 at 9:20 AM, LVN J said she had been employed at the facility since January 2023 prn (as needed). She said she should have cleaned her scissors prior to providing wound care treatment and placed them on the over bed table with the wound supplies. She said she should not have kept her scissors in her pocket. She said she had training on infection control. She said equipment should be cleaned before and after resident use and residents could be at risk of infections. 2. Record review of an admission Record for Resident #17 dated 7/13/2023 indicated she admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was [AGE] years old with diagnoses of atherosclerotic heart disease (buildup of fats and cholesterol in the arteries), iron deficiency anemia (low red blood cells in the body which carry oxygen) and dementia (loss of thinking, remembering and reasoning that interferes with daily activities). Record review of a Quarterly MDS Assessment for Resident #17 dated 7/10/2023 indicated she was rarely/never understood and was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. Record review of a care plan for Resident #17 undated indicated she had an ADL self-care performance deficit related to dementia and was no longer able to toilet self. She needs total assist of one to toilet and for perineal hygiene. She had bowel and bladder continence related to cognitive factors with interventions to check the resident every two hours and as required for incontinence. During an observation on 7/13/2023 at 9:25 AM in Resident #17's room, CNA I and CNA E were present to provide incontinent care for Resident #17. CNA E positioned Resident #17 on her right side. CNA I removed wipes from the plastic bag and wiped Resident #17's rectal area with multiple wipes from front to back to remove fecal material until area was clean. CNA I removed the soiled brief and placed it in the trash. CNA I placed a clean under pad and then positioned a brief underneath Resident #17's buttocks without removing her dirty gloves. CNA I and CNA E repositioned Resident #17 on her back and secured the brief, linens pulled back up During an interview on 7/13/2023 at 9:40 AM, CNA I said she had been employed at the facility since 2019. She said she normally worked nights. She said during the incontinent care provided to Resident #17 she should have changed her gloves before she placed the clean brief and under pad. She said the facility did in-services with staff and trainings online that included infection control. She said she did not remember having a skills check off with staff who observed her perform incontinent care since she on hire. She said residents could be at risk of bacterial transfer if she did not change her gloves from dirty to clean. During an interview on 7/13/2023 at 9:45 AM, the ADON said she had been employed at the facility since January 30, 2023. She said she was responsible for training staff on infection control and completing competency check offs for the aides and nurses at the facility. She said the competency skills check offs were to be completed on hire and annually for staff. She said residents could be at risk of infection if staff did not change gloves when changing from dirty to clean. She said she could not find a competency skills check off for CNA I. She said she facility had a change in ownership a few months ago and was not sure where the skills check offs were stored. During an interview on 7/13/2023 at 1:50 PM, the DON said she had been employed at the facility as the DON since February 2023. She said staff should be washing their hands between glove changes or sanitizing their hands. She said equipment should be cleaned prior to each resident and before and after each use. She said residents could be at risk of infection. She said going forward staff would be in-serviced on proper technique on infection control. During an interview on 7/13/2023 at 2:00 PM, the Regional Nurse said CNA I should have changed her gloves going between clean and dirty. She said handwashing should be done prior to providing care to residents and between glove changes. She said a resident could be at risk for infection and cross contamination. Record review of a facility policy titled Cleaning and Disinfection of Resident-care Items and Equipment with a revised date of October 2018 indicated, .Resident-care equipment, including reusable and durable medical equipment will be cleaned and disinfected according to current CDC recommendations for disinfection, d. Reusable items are cleaned and disinfected or sterilized between residents (e.g., stethoscopes, durable medical equipment), 4. Reusable resident care equipment will be decontaminated and/or sterilized between residents according to manufacturers' instructions . Record review of a facility policy titled Handwashing/Hand Hygiene with a revised date of August 2019 indicated, .This facility considers hand hygiene the primary means to prevent the spread of infections. 2. All personnel shall follow the handwashing/hand hygiene procedures to help prevent the spread of infections to other personnel, residents, and visitors. 7. Use an alcohol-based hand rub containing at least 62% alcohol; or, alternatively, soap and water for the following situations: g. Before handling clean or soiled dressings, gauze pads, etc.; h. Before moving from a contaminate body site to a clean body site during resident care .
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0727 (Tag F0727)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to use the services of a registered nurse for at least eight consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week for 2 of 3 months reviewed. (February 2023...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to use the services of a registered nurse for at least eight consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week for 2 of 3 months reviewed. (February 2023 and March 2023) The facility did not have RN coverage for 1 day in February 2023. The facility did not have RN coverage for 3 days in March 2023. This failure could place residents at risk by leaving staff without supervisory coverage for RN specific nursing activities and for coordination of events such as an emergency care and disasters. Findings included: Record review of the RN punch detail hour report for February 2023 indicated there were no RN hours worked on the following date: 2/12/2023. Record review of the RN punch detail hour report for March 2023 indicated there were no RN hours worked on the following dates: 3/18/2023, 3/25/2203, and 3/26/2023. Record review of the CMS Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) report for the second quarter of 2023 (January 1, 2023, through March 31, 2023) indicated there were no RN hours for the following dates: 02/11 (SA); 02/12 (SU); 02/13 (MO) 03/16 (TH); 03/17 (FR); 03/18 (SA); 03/20 (MO); 03/21 (TU); 03/22 (WE); 03/23 (TH); 03/24 (FR); 03/25; (SA); 03/26 (SU); 03/27 (MO); 03/28 (TU); 03/29 (WE); 03/30 (TH); 03/31 (FR) During an interview on 7/11/2023 at 12:10 PM, the BOM said she had been employed at the facility since 11/8/2021. She said the ADON was responsible for staffing. She said the previous DON last day at the facility was on 1/28/2023 and the Regional Nurse was coming to the facility during that time. She said the current DON started at the facility as a weekend RN on 11/4/2022 and did not become the DON of the facility until the beginning of February 2023. She said the DON did not clock in or out when she worked. The BOM said she would enter in time of 8 hours on the days the DON worked in the payroll time system. During an interview on 7/12/2023 at 1:30 PM, the ADON said she had been employed at the facility since January 30, 2023. She said she was responsible for staffing. She said in February 2023 the facility had 2 RN's that worked the weekends and the DON at that time worked some weekends also. She said on 2/12/2023 the DON was scheduled on her calendar. She said in March 2023 the facility had a nurse who worked the weekends but did not have record of who was scheduled to work on 3/18/2023, 3/25/2203, and 3/26/2023. She said her schedules only indicated who was on call for those days and it was not a RN. During an interview on 7/13/2023 at 8:39 AM, the Accounts Payable Manager said the RN hours for the facilities was automatically entered into the PBJ reporting data. She said salaried RN hours were entered into the payroll system manually by the BOM, but she was not sure why the hours were not reported to the PBJ system. She said she was not aware of the missing RN hours for the second quarter. During an interview on 7/13/2023 at 2:00 PM, the Regional Nurse said the facility should have an RN in the facility 8 hours a day, 7 days a week. She said if there was not a RN scheduled, then she would come to the facility and if she was not available, she would get agency staff to cover the hours. She said the facility also had access to a RN via phone if needed. She said she could not think of any risk that could affect the residents by not having a RN in the facility daily. She said going forward she would have RN coverage daily and would have documentation for the RN's who cover the weekends. During an interview on 7/13/2023 at 4:35 PM, the Corporate Director of Nursing said there was a system error with how payroll was entering the hours for RN coverage and how it was being submitted to CMS. Record review of a facility policy dated June 2022 titled Electronic Staffing Data Submission Payroll-Based Journal indicated. Accuracy: Staffing information is required to be an accurate and complete submission of a facility's staffing records . Record review of a facility policy undated titled Staffing indicated, .Our facility provides sufficient numbers of staff with the skills and competency necessary to provide care and services for all residents in accordance with resident care plans and the facility assessment. An RN is available for coverage 8 hours a day, 7 days a week .
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitch...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen in that: The facility failed to ensure an opened items in the reach in refrigerators were labeled and dated correctly. The facility failed to ensure all food items were discarded by the expiration date. This deficient practice could place residents who ate food from the kitchen at risk for foodborne illness. The findings included: During an observation, in the main refrigerator, on 07/10/2023 at 09:00 a.m., revealed on the top shelf a clear plastic container with a green lid of au gratin potatoes with no label or date on main container or individual containers, on the top shelf clear container of condiments of mayonnaise and pickle relish in individual containers with no label or date, on top shelf a bottle of chocolate syrup with the expiration date of 05/2023, on the top shelf an open box of baking soda with a expiration date of 06/28/2023, on the second shelf a plastic grocery bag of personal employee items that contained pomegranate juice, jalapenos, cilantro, and garlic paste, on the bottom shelf two plastic zip lock bags that contained raw hamburger meat with no label, received or expiration date. During an observation, in the milk cooler, on 07/10/2023 at 09:00 a.m., revealed in one of the milk crates two 236ml Dairy Pure 2% reduced fat milk with the expiration date of 07/09/2023. During an Interview 07/10/23 09:50 AM the DM said she has worked here for 6 years and has never had any expired items. Said she is currently an administrator in training and the person who would be taking her place is on her way to the facility. Said she is ultimately responsible for the dietary department at this time. She said all food is to be labeled with the received date or expiration date. She said she does not know why the expired items were not pulled from the refrigerator and discarded. She said staff knows they are not supposed to have personal items in the facility refrigerators. She said the food in the clear container with the green lid is au gratin potatoes left over from Fridays dinner meal. Said the expired foods and personal food in the fridge puts the residents at risk for food borne illnesses and cross contamination. During an interview on 07/10/2023 at 5:29 p.m., the administrator said that he was checking the kitchen periodically however he was out of town last week and that is when the expired foods happened. He said everything in the refrigerator is supposed to be labeled and dated with no personal items in the fridge. He said the water that was leaking from the top of the fridge is coming from ice that had accumulated on the top of the fridge and is melting. He said the potential harm to resident is cross contamination and the possibility of food borne illnesses. During an interview 07/11/23 at 12:30 PM the Dietary aide said she was currently taking classes for her dietary managers certification and once it is complete, she will officially be the dietary manager in the kitchen. She said all items that are put in the fridge must be labeled and dated and no personal items are to be put in the fridge. She said if a resident was to consume expired foods it could cause the resident to become sick. She said personal items in the fridge is cross contamination and could also cause residents to become sick. Record Review 07/13/23 at 08:24 AM of policy titled Refrigerated Storage revealed under dairy products: Milk, fluid-follow expiration date. Record Review 07/13/23 08:26 AM of policy titled Refrigerators and Freezers dated 2001 with a revised date of April 2006 revealed: 7. All food shall be appropriately dated to ensure proper rotation by expiration dates. Received dates (dates of delivery) will be marked on cases and on individual items removed from cases for storage. use by dates will be completed with expiration dates on all prepared food in refrigerators. Expiration dates on unopened food will be observed and use by dates indicated once food is opened. 8. Supervisors will be responsible for ensuring food items in pantry, refrigerators, and freezers are not expired or past perish dates. Supervisors should contact vendors or manufacturers when expiration dates are in question or to decipher codes. 9. Supervisors will inspect refrigerators and freezers monthly for gasket condition, fan condition, presence of rust, excess condensation, and any other damage or maintenance needs. Necessary repairs will be initiated immediately. Maintenance schedules per manufacturer guidelines will be scheduled and followed. 9. Refrigerators and freezers will be kept clean, free of debris, and mopped with sanitizing solution on a scheduled basis and more often as necessary.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Room Equipment (Tag F0908)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain all mechanical, electrical, and patient care equipment in safe operating condition for 1 of 1 refrigerator in the ki...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain all mechanical, electrical, and patient care equipment in safe operating condition for 1 of 1 refrigerator in the kitchen reviewed for essential equipment. The facility did not ensure the refrigerator was in safe operating condition. The refrigerator had built up condensation in the top of the refrigerator that was melting and leaking water in food and storage containers within the refrigerator. This failure could place the residents at risk of food borne illnesses and not having safe operating equipment. Findings included: During an observation on 07/10/2023 at 09:00 AM the kitchen refrigerator was observed to have ice buildup in the top of the refrigerator that was melting and leaking into food and storage containers in the refrigerator. There was a clear plastic container half full of water with condiments mayonnaise and pickle relish containers floating. Water was standing on top of three containers of sour cream. Standing water was on top of the container of left over au gratin potatoes. During an interview on 07/10/23 at 09:50 AM the DM said she has worked here for 6 years. Said she told the maintenance man last week that the fridge was leaking and said there was a repair man that came, and they were currently waiting on the part to fix it. During an interview 07/10/23 at 10:15 AM the Maintenance man said the repair man came to work on the freezer and he also had them look at the fridge. He said they also cleaned the condenser to the fridge. During an interview 07/12/23 at 08:30 AM the administrator, he said the water that was leaking from the top of the fridge was coming from ice that had accumulated on the top of the fridge and is melting. He said the potential harm to resident is cross contamination and the possibility of food borne illnesses. Record review 07/10/23 10:15 AM of a work order estimate with [company name] Restaurant and chemical supply certified service center dated 6/13/23 said the following were reasons for the service call 1. 5/30/23 freezer was not the correct temp. 2. 6/2/23 Fans for the evaporator not working for the freezer. 3. 6/9/23 Freezer not at temp. Record Review 07/13/23 08:26 AM of policy titled Refrigerators and Freezers dated 2001 with a revised date of April 2006 revealed: 9. Supervisors will inspect refrigerators and freezers monthly for gasket condition, fan condition, presence of rust, excess condensation, and any other damage or maintenance needs. Necessary repairs will be initiated immediately. Maintenance schedules per manufacturer guidelines will be scheduled and followed. 9. Refrigerators and freezers will be kept clean, free of debris, and mopped with sanitizing solution on a scheduled basis and more often as necessary.
MINOR (C)

Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact

Staffing Data (Tag F0851)

Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, including information for agency and contract staff, b...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, including information for agency and contract staff, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data in a uniform format according to specifications established by CMS reviewed for administration (Fiscal year 2023 for the second quarter January 1, 2023, to March 31, 2022) The facility failed to submit accurate RN hours for: 02/11 (SA); 02/12 (SU); 02/13 (MO) 03/16 (TH); 03/17 (FR); 03/18 (SA); 03/20 (MO); 03/21 (TU); 03/22 (WE); 03/23 (TH); 03/24 (FR); 03/25; (SA); 03/26 (SU); 03/27 (MO); 03/28 (TU); 03/29 (WE); 03/30 (TH); 03/31 (FR) These failures could place residents at risk for personal needs not being identified and met. The findings included: Record review of the CMS PBJ report for the second quarter of 2023 (January 1, 2023, through March 31, 2023) indicated there was no RN hours for the following dates: 02/11 (SA); 02/12 (SU); 02/13 (MO) 03/16 (TH); 03/17 (FR); 03/18 (SA); 03/20 (MO); 03/21 (TU); 03/22 (WE); 03/23 (TH); 03/24 (FR); 03/25 (SA); 03/26 (SU); 03/27 (MO); 03/28 (TU); 03/29 (WE); 03/30 (TH); 03/31 (FR) Record review of a RN punch detail report for February and March 2023 indicated RN hours on 2/11/2023, 2/13/2023, 3/16/2023, 3/17/2023, 3/20/2023, 3/21/2023, 3/22/2023, 3/23/2023, 3/24/2023, 3/27/2023, 3/28/2023, 3/29/2023, 3/30/2023 and 3/31/2023. During an interview on 7/11/2023 at 12:10 PM, BOM said she had been employed at the facility since 11/8/2021. She said the previous DON last day at the facility was on 1/28/2023 and the Regional Nurse was coming to the facility during that time. She said the current DON started at the facility as a weekend RN on 11/4/2022 and did not become the DON of the facility until the beginning of February 2023. She said the DON did not clock in or out when they worked but she would enter in time of 8 hours on the days they worked. During an interview on 7/13/2023 at 8:39 AM, the Accounts Payable Manager said the RN hours for the facilities was automatically entered into the PBJ reporting data. She said salaried RN's hours were entered into the payroll system manually by the BOM but was not sure why the hours were not reported to the PBJ system and thought it could be how the BOM was coding the hours in the payroll system. She said she was not aware of the missing RN hours for the second quarter. During an interview on 7/13/2023 at 4:35 PM, the Corporate Director of Nursing said there was a system error with how payroll was entering the hours for RN coverage and how it was being submitted to CMS. He said going forward they were going to review the payroll hours reported with accounts payable every 7 days to ensure it was getting accurate information to be submitted to CMS. Record review of a facility policy dated June 2022 titled Electronic Staffing Data Submission Payroll-Based Journal indicated. Accuracy: Staffing information is required to be an accurate and complete submission of a facility's staffing records .
Jun 2023 3 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0657 (Tag F0657)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to review and revise the person-centered care plan to reflect the curr...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to review and revise the person-centered care plan to reflect the current condition for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's care plan reflected current resident code status. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving appropriate care to meet their current needs. Findings include: Record review of a face sheet for Resident #2 dated [DATE] indicated that he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including complete paraplegia (paralysis where function is impeded below the waist), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a chronic inflammatory lung disease that causes obstructed airflow from the lungs), depression, and hypertension. Record review of a quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #2 indicated that he had a BIMS score of 15, indicating that he was cognitively intact. Record review of electronic medical record for Resident #2 indicated that he had a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) code status, indicating that he did not wish to have CPR performed. Record review of physician orders dated [DATE] for Resident #2 indicated that he had the following order: Advanced Directive DNR dated [DATE]. Record review of care plan dated [DATE] for Resident #2 indicated that his code status was Full Code with goal stating Request for CPR to be initiated will be followed with last revision date of [DATE]. Previous care plan conferences were documented on [DATE] and [DATE]. Record review of electronic medical record for Resident #2 indicated that there was a signed copy of a DNR in his record dated [DATE]. During an interview on [DATE] at 1:45 pm, MDS nurse said that she was responsible for updating care plans and ensuring their accuracy. She said that she had taken the MDS position around December of 2022. She was unable to say how the code status section of his care plan had been missed but said that she did do quarterly care plan reviews. She said that section must have been overlooked. She said that going forward, she would ensure that she did a thorough and comprehensive care plan review to ensure that all care plans were accurate. She said that residents could be at risk for not receiving appropriate care without an accurate care plan. She said that Resident #2 could be at risk for having CPR initiated against his wishes. During an interview on [DATE] at 3:00 pm, the DON said that she was responsible for overseeing MDS nurse and care plans. She was unable to say why Resident #2's care plan had not been updated with current code status. She said that this could put him at risk of having CPR initiated when he has expressed his desire for DNR. Review of facility policy titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered dated 2001 with revision date of [DATE] indicated .The comprehensive, person-centered care plan will: .Reflect the resident's expressed wishes regarding care and treatment goals .
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored in locke...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments under proper temperature controls for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #3) reviewed for medications. The facility did not secure Resident #3's Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Suspension (treats allergy symptoms) in a locked compartment. This failure could placed residents at risk of harm by improper dosing and infection. Findings include: Record review of a face sheet for Resident #3 dated 6/20/23 indicated that she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic kidney disease (loss of kidney function), type 1 diabetes mellitus (an autoimmune reaction (the body attacks itself by mistake). This reaction stops your body from making insulin), congestive heart failure (A progressive heart disease that affects pumping action of the heart muscles), and iron deficiency anemia (too little iron in the body). Record review of a quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #3 indicated that she had a BIMS score of 12, which indicated that she had moderate cognitive impairment. Record review of care plan for Resident #3 dated 6/20/23 indicated that there was no care plan development for resident to self-administer medications. Record review of physician orders for Resident #3 dated 6/20/23 indicated that she had the following order: Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Suspension 50mcg/act 2 sprays in each nostril one time per day for allergies. There was no physician order for Resident #3 to self-administer this medication. During an observation on 06/20/23 at 10:42 am fluticasone 50mcg nasal spray was observed on Resident #3's overbed table. Resident was unable to say who left medication in room, saying that she did not want to get anyone in trouble. She would not answer questions regarding medication. Resident #3 picked up medication and self-administered nasal spray while surveyor in room. During an interview with GN A on 6/20/23 at 10:55 am, she said that she would never leave medication in the room and was unsure how it got there. During an interview on 6/20/23 at 11:00 am, both the Administrator and ADON said that medication should not have been left in the resident's room and that resident did not have documentation, orders, assessments, or approval to self-administer medications. During an interview on 6/20/23 at 2:45 pm, ADON said that the nurses would be administering Resident #3's medication from now on. She said that Resident #3 has no place to securely store her medications where they would be inaccessible to other residents that may wander into her room. This could place other residents at risk of ingesting medications. During an interview on 6/20/23 at 3:00 pm, the DON was unable to say how the medicine was left in Resident #3's room but that they did not allow nurses to leave medications for residents to self-administer alone without proper assessments and documentation. She said that she had begun to in-service staff on this and going forward expected her staff to follow policy. She said that other residents could possibly wander into Resident #3's room and pick up and ingest medication, and residents who were not deemed competent could be at risk of infection or improper dosing. During an interview on 6/20/23 at 3:15 pm, Administrator said that going forward, he would expect his staff to follow proper policy and procedures related to medication administration to protect all residents from harm. Record review of facility policy titled Administering Medications dated 2001 indicated: o .Only persons licensed or permitted by this State may prepare, administer or record the administration of medications (e.g., physicians, pharmacists, RNs, LPNs/LVNs, Certified Medication Aides, etc.) . Record review of facility policy titled Self-Administration of Medications dated 2001 with revision date of February 2021 indicated: o .Residents have the right to self-administer medications if the interdisciplinary team has determined that it is clinically appropriate and safe for the resident to do so . and; o .If it is deemed safe and appropriate for a resident to self-administer medications, this is documented in the medical record and the care plan .
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0919 (Tag F0919)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to be equipped to allow residents to call for staff thro...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to be equipped to allow residents to call for staff through a communication system which relays the call directly to a centralized staff work area for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for call lights. (Resident #1). The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's emergency call light in the bathroom would reach the floor. The call light cord for Resident #1 was wrapped and tied around the support bar. This failure could place residents at risk of injury, pain, hospitalization, and a diminished quality of life. Findings include: Record review of a face sheet dated 6/20/23 indicated that Resident #1 was an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including: Right femur fracture (hip fracture), history of falling, depression, and Alzheimer's disease. Record review of a Comprehensive MDS assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #1 indicated that she had a BIMS score of 5, indicating that she had severe cognitive impairment. MDS Section G, question G0110 1I indicated that resident required extensive assist of one person for toilet use. During an observation on 06/20/23 at 10:35 a.m., the emergency call light in room [ROOM NUMBER] (Resident #1's room) observed wrapped around the grab bar in the resident bathroom. During an interview on 6/20/23 at 11:30 am, ADON said that cord should not be wrapped around the bar because if the resident were to fall, she would be unable to pull the string for help. ADON attempted to unwrap the cord, but it was tied in a knot. She said she would have it fixed immediately. She said that the Resident #1 was always accompanied by a CNA when going to the bathroom. During an interview on 6/20/23 at 3:00 pm, DON said that she was unable to say how the call light got wrapped and tied around the grab bar. She said that the call lights in bathroom needed to be accessible because if a resident were to fall, they needed to be able to reach the string to call for help. During an interview on 6/20/23 at 3:15 pm, the Administrator said that call lights needed to be accessible always in case the resident needed assistance or if there were an emergency. He said going forward, he would expect his staff to follow proper policy and procedure. Record review of facility policy titled Answering the call light dated 2001 indicated .Be sure that the call light is plugged in and functioning at all times .
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • 41% turnover. Below Texas's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: 7 life-threatening violation(s), 2 harm violation(s), $60,212 in fines. Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 29 deficiencies on record, including 7 critical (life-threatening) violations. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
  • • $60,212 in fines. Extremely high, among the most fined facilities in Texas. Major compliance failures.
  • • Grade F (0/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: This facility has 7 Immediate Jeopardy findings. Serious concerns require careful evaluation.

About This Facility

What is Hemphill's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns HEMPHILL CARE CENTER an overall rating of 2 out of 5 stars, which is considered below average nationally. Within Texas, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.

How is Hemphill Staffed?

CMS rates HEMPHILL CARE CENTER's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 41%, compared to the Texas average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.

What Have Inspectors Found at Hemphill?

State health inspectors documented 29 deficiencies at HEMPHILL CARE CENTER during 2023 to 2025. These included: 7 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death), 2 that caused actual resident harm, 18 with potential for harm, and 2 minor or isolated issues. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.

Who Owns and Operates Hemphill?

HEMPHILL CARE CENTER is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by GULF COAST LTC PARTNERS, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 89 certified beds and approximately 34 residents (about 38% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in HEMPHILL, Texas.

How Does Hemphill Compare to Other Texas Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Texas, HEMPHILL CARE CENTER's overall rating (2 stars) is below the state average of 2.8, staff turnover (41%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (2 stars) is below the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Hemphill?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations.

Is Hemphill Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, HEMPHILL CARE CENTER has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 7 Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 2-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Texas. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.

Do Nurses at Hemphill Stick Around?

HEMPHILL CARE CENTER has a staff turnover rate of 41%, which is about average for Texas nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.

Was Hemphill Ever Fined?

HEMPHILL CARE CENTER has been fined $60,212 across 3 penalty actions. This is above the Texas average of $33,681. Fines in this range indicate compliance issues significant enough for CMS to impose meaningful financial consequences. Common causes include delayed correction of deficiencies, repeat violations, or care failures affecting resident safety. Families should ask facility leadership what changes have been made since these penalties.

Is Hemphill on Any Federal Watch List?

HEMPHILL CARE CENTER is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.