AVIR AT ARDEN WOOD

8810 LONG POINT DR, HOUSTON, TX 77055 (713) 468-7833
For profit - Limited Liability company 174 Beds Independent Data: November 2025 9 Immediate Jeopardy citations
Trust Grade
0/100
#918 of 1168 in TX
Last Inspection: March 2025

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Avir at Arden Wood has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns about the quality of care provided. It ranks #918 out of 1168 facilities in Texas, placing it in the bottom half, and #73 out of 95 in Harris County, suggesting that there are many better options nearby. The facility is showing signs of improvement, with the number of issues decreasing from 7 in 2024 to 6 in 2025. Staffing is a relative strength, with a rating of 4 out of 5 stars and a turnover rate of 38%, which is below the state average, meaning staff generally stay longer and are familiar with residents. However, the facility has incurred $107,493 in fines, which is concerning as it is higher than 75% of Texas facilities, hinting at ongoing compliance problems. Recent inspections revealed critical failures, including neglect of infection control protocols, which allowed 13 residents and several staff members to contract scabies due to inadequate measures. Additionally, the facility did not ensure that their infection preventionist had received the necessary training, further compromising residents' safety. While staffing levels are good, the serious issues related to infection control and neglect raise significant red flags for families considering this facility for their loved ones.

Trust Score
F
0/100
In Texas
#918/1168
Bottom 22%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Getting Better
7 → 6 violations
Staff Stability
○ Average
38% turnover. Near Texas's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
Penalties
✓ Good
$107,493 in fines. Lower than most Texas facilities. Relatively clean record.
Skilled Nurses
○ Average
Each resident gets 30 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for Texas. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
Violations
⚠ Watch
23 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Overall Rating
★★★★☆
4.0
Staff Levels
★★★★☆
4.0
Care Quality
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2024: 7 issues
2025: 6 issues

The Good

  • 4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
  • 4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record
  • Staff turnover below average (38%)

    10 points below Texas average of 48%

Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, fire safety.

The Bad

1-Star Overall Rating

Below Texas average (2.8)

Significant quality concerns identified by CMS

Staff Turnover: 38%

Near Texas avg (46%)

Typical for the industry

Federal Fines: $107,493

Well above median ($33,413)

Significant penalties indicating serious issues

The Ugly 23 deficiencies on record

9 life-threatening
Mar 2025 6 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

PASARR Coordination (Tag F0644)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to coordinate an assessment with the Preadmission Screening and Residen...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to coordinate an assessment with the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review program (PASRR) under Medicaid to the maximum extent practicable to avoid duplicative testing and effort for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #119) reviewed for PASRR services. The facility failed to submit a NFSS request for nursing facility specialized services in the LTC Online Portal for Resident #119's Specialized Pressure-Reducing Support Surface Mattress by a specific deadline of 12/04/2024 This failure could place residents with a positive PASRR evaluation at risk of not receiving specialized PASRR services which could contribute to a decline in physical, mental, psychosocial well-being and quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #119's face sheet dated 03/26/2025 revealed a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included Diabetes Type 2, Pain, Muscle Weakness, Major Depressive Disorder, Severe Intellectual Disabilities, Heart Failure, Pressure Ulcer, Disorder Of The Skin And Subcutaneous Tissue. Record review of Resident #119's PASRR records revealed her PE occurred on 09/27/2024. The IDT meeting to determine which services she needed was held on 11/06/2024. Record review of the PCSP form which summarizes and documents the IDT meeting with the Habilitation Coordinator to plan services reflected it was held on 11/06/2024. The plan was for Resident #119 to receive a Specialized Pressure-Reducing Support Surface Mattress. Interview on 03/27/2025 at 12:45p.m., with MDS A revealed there was initially an issue with Resident #119 having two social security numbers which delayed things. The initial social security number used on the PASRR forms was not the correct one and the process had to be repeated with the correct social security number. The meeting on 11/06/2024 was conducted without an issue. The DOR would be the one responsible for submitting the NFSS after the meeting. Interview on 03/27/2025 at 12:56p.m., with the DO revealed a tracking system of checking the NFSS submission status in the portal on a daily basis. Resident #119 had social security number issues because she had two identities. The initial NFSS had to be withdrawn, and the entire thing repeated and sent in again. A new PE and IDT meeting had to be completed. The DOR was aware that they have 20 business days to submit the NFSS after the IDT meeting. He reported he was not able to get the medical equipment supplier quote within the timeframe to submit the NFSS on time. The resident discharged in February 2025 so the mattress was never ordered and the NFSS was not submitted. Request was made on 3/28/2025 to the Administrator for the policy and procedures for PASRR. The policy provided was Detailed Item by Item Guide for Completing the PASRR Evaluation (PE), from Texas Health and Human Services, dated June 2023. The facility did not provide a written document of the facility's PASRR process. Record review of Companion Guide for Completing the Authorization Request for PASRR Nursing Facility Specialized Services (NFSS) from Texas Health and Human Services, Dated November 2023, revealed a nursing facility has 20 business days from the date of the initial IDT or a specialized services review meeting to initiate all PASRR NFSS recommended and agreed to at the meeting.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Resident #98 General 03/28/25 01:41 PM resident did not have upper parameter for blood sugar monitoring in MD orders, did call MD for clarification and had high blood sugar for consecutive days.

Read full inspector narrative →
Resident #98 General 03/28/25 01:41 PM resident did not have upper parameter for blood sugar monitoring in MD orders, did call MD for clarification and had high blood sugar for consecutive days.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0710 (Tag F0710)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure medical care of each resident was supervised by ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure medical care of each resident was supervised by a physician and a physician, physician assistant, nurse practitioner, or clinical nurse specialist provided orders for the resident's immediate care and needs for one of seven residents (Resident #98) reviewed for physician services . The facility failed to ensure Resident #98 had an order for blood sugar parameters for when to report blood glucose levels to the physician according to their policy. This failure placed residents at risk for potential lack of medical supervision by a physician. The findings were: Record review of Resident #98's face sheet dated 03/27/2025 reflected a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (the body cannot use insulin correctly and sugar builds up in the blood), chronic kidney disease (kidneys aren't working properly and are beginning to lose their function), hemiplegia (is a symptom that involves one-sided paralysis). Record review of Resident #98's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], reflected Resident #98 had a BIMS score that was 09 out of 15 which suggested moderate cognitive impairment. He had limited range of motion of upper and lower extremities and needed partial/moderate assistance with oral hygiene, needed substantial/maximal assistance with dressing, and was dependent with personal hygiene, toileting, bathing. Review of Resident #98's Care Plan date initiated 01/06/2025, Revision date 03/25/2025 revealed: Focus: Resident #98 has Diabetes Mellitus. Goal: The resident will have no complications related to diabetes through the review date. Intervention: Diabetes medication as ordered by doctor. Monitor/document for side effects and effectiveness. Monitor/document/report PRN any signs and symptoms of hypoglycemia : sweating, tremor, increased heart rate (tachycardia), nervousness, confusion, slurred speech, lack of coordination, staggering gait. Record review of Resident #98's physician order dated 01/01/2025 review report reflected: Insulin glargine Solution 100 unit/ml Inject 6 units subcutaneously one time a day for diabetes HOLD FOR BLOOD GLUCOSE<100. Record review of Resident #98's physician order dated 01/01/2025 review report reflected: Glucose Oral Tablet Chewable 4 gram give one tablet by day every 24 hours as needed for DM2 for low blood sugar < 70 . Record review of Blood Sugar Summary dated: 03/17/2025 23:09 blood sugar 178 mg/dl 03/17/2025 18:16 234.0 mg/dl 03/17/2025 07:28 blood sugar 330 mg/dl 03/17/2025 05:05 98.0 mg/dl 03/17/2025 00:23 112.0 mg/dl 03/18/2025 23:01 blood sugar 208 mg/dl 03/18/2025 18:00 blood sugar 324 mg/dl 03/18/2025 14:14 blood sugar 284 mg/dl 03/18/2025 07:27 blood sugar 284 mg/dl 03/18/2025 06:00 blood sugar 154 mg/dl 03/19/2025 07:13 blood sugar 254 mg/dl 03/19/2025 07:07 blood sugar 254 mg/dl 03/20/2025 10:35 blood sugar 148 mg/dl 03/21/2025 07:39 blood sugar 329 mg/dl 03/22/2025 08:12 blood sugar 302 mg/dl 03/23/2025 07:36 blood sugar 329 mg/dl 03/25/2025 18:28 blood sugar 315 mg/dl Record review of Resident #98's progress notes dated 03/17/2025-03/25/2025, reflected notification of high blood glucose was not reported to guardian or physician until 03/25/2025. In an observation on 03/25/25 at 09:38 AM with Resident #98. Tube feeding was present, and resident was sleeping, wearing gown. Resident appeared to be resting comfortably. Resident did not wake up during surveyor's conversation with roommate. Linens and resident appeared clean, no odors noted from bed. In an interview on 3/27/2025 at 3:00 pm with ADON #2, Resident #98 receives Lantus (insulin for diabetes) 8 units-daily. ADON #2 stated blood sugar between 200 mg/dl -250 mg/dl should be reported to the doctor. Blood sugar of 310 mg/dl was noted on 3/24/25 and ADON #2, stated there were no high blood sugar parameters ordered to report to the doctor or family. ADON #2 stated for blood sugar greater than 300 mg/dl the doctor should've been notified and perhaps a short acting insulin order could have been obtained. ADON #2 stated adverse effects of not reporting blood sugar of greater than 300 mg/dl are possible worsening of infection, and sepsis (a serious condition that occurs when the body has an extreme reaction to an infection). ADON #2 stated nurse LVN A and LVN C should have reported trending high blood sugar to herself, the doctor, and family. ADON #2 stated she does not recall if there were ever any high blood sugar parameters on the chart that needed to be reported to the doctor. In an interview on 3/28/2025 at 9:01 AM with the MD, she reported if she received a call regarding abnormal blood sugars she would act on it depending on the situation. The MD stated she only wants to be called regarding blood sugars below 70 mg/dl and above 400 mg/dl. The MD was asked about a resident who had a blood sugar in the 100 mg/dl range, and then had blood sugars greater than 300 mg/dl for several days. The MD said she would not anticipate any calls from the facility, this is her standard. The MD did not answer questions about nursing standard of care for reporting high blood sugar greater than 300 mg/dl. The MD reported for high blood sugar in a prerenal (a condition in which kidney dysfunction has occurred because of inadequate blood flow to the kidney tissue) resident, she would expect to see the blood sugar to excrete slower. MD reported she does receive verbal or written communication from the dietician regarding recommendations however attends IDT meetings with dietician and management. The MD stated that Resident # 98 was placed on continuous tube feed, was being treated for infection, and had completed antibiotic medication. She said she would anticipate blood sugar rising and only wanted to be notified of sugars below 70 mg/dl and greater than 400 mg/dl. In an interview on 3/28/2025 at 10:05 AM with LVN C. LVN C stated parameters for high and low blood sugars should be on the chart. LVN C stated when the high and low blood sugar parameters are on the chart she will follow them. LVN C stated she would call the MD for blood sugar orders if not on the chart. LVN C stated she should call the doctor if blood sugar was greater than 300 mg/dl. LVN C reported side effects of high blood sugar would be potential damage to organs and adverse effects would be sweating and agitation. LVN C reported if the resident is diabetic and prerenal more issues with the kidneys would be a potential side effect of high blood sugar. LVN C reported she was last in-serviced regarding insulin administration, monitoring, and reporting within the last week and during orientation. In an interview on 3/28/2025 at 10:40 AM with the DON, he stated high and low blood sugar parameters are typically on the chart and the facility needs to call the MD for orders if they are not on the chart. No call documented observed during the record review. The DON stated the MD meets with the IDT and informs the management of high and low blood sugar parameters. The DON then reports the high and low blood sugar parameters to the nurses. The DON did not answer questions regarding when a nurse should call a doctor if an unusual sugar for the resident is found, and there are no high and low blood sugar parameters on the chart. The DON stated the side effects of high blood sugar are thirst and altered mental status. The DON reported if blood sugars are high for several days, calling the MD is dependent on the resident. The DON stated low blood sugar in the elderly population is worse than high blood sugar. The DON reported if a resident has high blood sugar for several days, the resident may be a symptomatic however, it is dependent on their baseline. The DON reported a high blood sugar in a diabetic, who is prerenal could affect their kidneys. The DON reported there was an in-service for insulin monitoring and reporting yesterday and two months ago. The DON's expectations are nurses should report any radical changes in any blood sugars., The DON stated monitoring of blood sugars is being done daily and he would notify the doctor for any increased blood sugar readings. The DON is not sure if any of his nurses reported blood sugars of 300 mg/dl or higher in Resident# 98 in the past few days. In an interview on 3/28/2025 at 11:07 AM, with Dietitian the Dietitian stated she doesn't know if blood sugar parameters are on the chart. The Dietitian reported she looked at the charts monthly for blood sugars to see what the average range was. The Dietitian reported if she changed a supplement or tube feeding, she would monitor and assess during her next visit to see how the resident is being affected. The Dietician relied on nurses to notify her if there's a change in any type of blood sugars and how the resident is tolerating new changes. The Dietitian reported the ADA gives broad range of reporting to doctor for blood sugars, but is not specific to a resident, however, if a resident is completely out of their range she would anticipate changes to be reported to somebody. The Dietitian reported side effects of high blood sugar would be decreased circulation in the small blood vessels and possible damage to liver and kidneys. The Dietitian reported she does look through the chart to understand why critical values might be documented, and if not able to ascertain information in the chart, she would go to the DON. The Dietician stated she remembered changing the tube feeding product for Resident# 98 on 3/20/2025 and documented blood sugars could be potentially higher. The Dietician reported the blood sugars could be between 119 mg/dl and 330 mg/dl due to change of feeding over 22 hours. The Dietician stated she communicated with the MD when new orders are placed but would not recommend increase blood sugar monitoring as that would be an MD order. In an interview on 3/28/2025 at 11:23 AM, with LVN A stated there should be high and low blood sugar parameters on charts. LVN A stated she would call the MD if blood sugar was higher than 200 mg/dl, if there are no parameters for high blood sugar. LVN A stated side effects of high blood sugar are confusion, diabetic coma, cold clammy skin , and increased thirst. LVN A stated if high blood sugar persisted, it could affect major organs. LVN A stated a diabetic patient who is pre-renal could have further complications with kidneys. LVN A stated her last in-service regarding insulin monitoring and reporting was yesterday and approximately two months ago. LVN A stated she was not sure why she did not report blood sugars of 300 mg/dl for Resident# 98 to the DON or MD. Record review of Diabetes -Clinical Protocol. Treatment/Management #4. The physician will address complications such as dyslipidemia, coronary artery disease, neuropathy and nephropathy based on individual's overall condition, prognosis, function, and treatment preferences. Monitoring and Follow-Up. #1 The Physician will follow up on any acute episodes associated with significant sustained change in blood sugars or significant deterioration of previous glucose control and document resident status at subsequent visits until the acute situation it is resolved. #4 The physician will order desired parameters for monitoring and reporting information related to blood sugar management. #5 The staff will incorporate such parameters into the Medication Administration Record and Care Plan.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pharmacy Services (Tag F0755)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #6) reviewed for pharmacy services. -The facility failed to give Resident #6 medications as ordered by the physician on 3/25/2025. - The facility failed to maintain accurate records of controlled drugs when LVN B signed out a Lorazepam pill but did not administer it. This failure could place residents who receive medications at risk of not receiving the intended therapeutic benefit of the medications. Findings included: Record review of the admission Record for Resident #6 revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and originally admitted on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included drug induced Parkinsonism (appears like symptom of Parkinson's disease), COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) (a lung condition caused by damage to the airway), schizophrenia, anxiety, depression, and dementia. Record review of Resident #6's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 00 out of 15 indicating severe cognitive impairment. Section E - Behavior of the MDS revealed she had physical and verbal behavioral symptoms directed towards others. She had rejected care and wandering behavior. She required supervision by staff for all ADLs. Further review revealed she was receiving Antipsychotic, Antianxiety and Antidepressant medication. Record review of Resident #6's active physician order summary report dated 03/28/2025 revealed an order for Lorazepam 0.5 mg, give one tablet by mouth three times a day for agitation/anxiety, start date 10/14/2024. Record review of Resident #6's undated care plan revealed: Focus - Resident #6 wanders aimlessly r/t dementia and schizophrenia diagnosis. Resident #6 admitted to the secured/memory unit. Interventions included, monitor for fatigue and weight loss. Focus - Resident #6 had mood problems r/t anxiety, insomnia, and depression. Yells out in hall and sings loudly. Refuses care at times and refuses medications. 11/28/24 - she refused all medications. Interventions included, administer medications as ordered. Monitor for side effects and effectiveness. Focus - Resident had potential for behavior problems r/t diagnosis of schizophrenia, history of refusing care, taking items that don't belong to her and aggressiveness. Interventions included, administer medications as ordered. Focus - Resident #6 uses anti-anxiety medications Lorazepam r/t anxiety disorder. Interventions included: Administer Antidepressant medications as ordered by physician. Monitor/document side effects and effectiveness every shift. Record review of Resident #6's Medication Administration Report dated 03/28/2025 revealed Lorazepam 0.5 mg tablet ordered to be administered on 03/25/2025 at 8:00 PM was corrected to not given by LVN B. Interview and observation on 3/26/2025 at 6:15 AM of the medication cart in the back hall of the secured unit, revealed a Lorazepam 0.5mg blister pack for Resident #6 contained 34 tablets. The narcotic sign out sheet for Resident #6's Lorazepam 0.5mg tablets revealed on 3/25/2025 at 8:00 PM, LVN B signed out one tablet. The amount remaining was recorded as 33 tablets. LVN B stated the tablet was not popped out and she thought she popped it out before giving meds to Resident #6. She stated the missed dose of Lorazepam could affect the resident's behavior. LVN B stated she would write a medication error report and notify Resident #6's physician of the missed dose. Observation on 3/26/2025 at 7:00 AM, revealed Resident #6 was in the dining room of the secured unit with other residents. She was walking around, visiting with other residents, and talking in her language. In an interview on 3/26/2025 at 2:30 PM, the DON stated the nurse is responsible for the narcotic count and the first step of the day would be to count with the next shift. The DON stated any discrepancy should be noted at that time then they would have to find out why a narcotic was not given by checking the MAR and narcotic book. The DON stated he expected the nurses would notify the DON as soon as possible. He stated that each pill must be given the way the doctor ordered. The DON stated the doctor's orders for Lorazepam 0.5mg to be given three times a day was not followed at that time and LVN B missed it. The DON stated it could potentially affect Resident #6 negatively, but she slept through the night, so it did not affect her. He stated she had no anxiety, but the nurses still would need to be consistent to protect the resident. In an interview on 3/28/2025 at 10:00 AM, the DON stated that the basics of medication administration for nurses was the 5 rights: right resident, right medication, right dose, right route, and right time. He stated LVN B was probably not paying attention when dispensing the Lorazepam tablet from the blister pack. Record review of the facility's policy for General Guidelines for Medication Administration, revised on 08/2020 read in part: Medications are administered as prescribed in accordance with good nursing principles and practices and only by persons legally authorized to administer. Personnel authorized to administer medications do so only after they have been properly oriented to the facility's medication distribution system (procurement, storage, handling, and administration). The facility has sufficient staff and medication distribution system to ensure safe administration of medications without unnecessary interruptions 4. At a minimum, the 5 Rights - right resident, right drug, right dose, right route, and right time - should be applied to all medication administrations and reviewed at three steps in the process of preparation: (1) when medication is selected, (2) when the dose is removed from the container, and (3) after the dose is prepared and the medication is put away . Record review of the facility's policy for Controlled Substances, revised on 08/2020, read in part: Medications classified as controlled substances by the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) are subject to special handling, storage, disposal, and recordkeeping in the facility in accordance with state and federal laws and regulations .Procedures .4. Preparation of the dosage form occurs according to the medication administration policy. 5. Accurate inventory of all controlled medications is maintained at all times .
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to, in accordance with State and Federal laws, store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments under proper temperature co...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to, in accordance with State and Federal laws, store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments under proper temperature controls, and permit only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for 2 (Station 1 medication cart for the front hall and secured unit medication cart for the back hall) of 3 medication carts reviewed. The narcotic box in the medication cart for the back hall in the secured unit contained a pill card for Lorazepam 0.5 mg with a piece of tape over a torn protective seal. The narcotic box in the medication cart for station 1 front hall contained a pill card for Tramadol 50 mg and a pill card for Lorazepam 1mg with torn protective seals. The failures could place all residents at risk of not receiving the therapeutic benefit of medications, infection, adverse reactions to medications and drug diversion. Findings included: Interview and observation on 3/26/2025 at 6:15 AM of the medication cart for the back hall in the secured unit revealed it contained a pill card for Lorazepam 0.5mg. There were 7 tablets, and each tablet was individually sealed. The tablet in the 7th compartment had a torn seal that was closed with a piece of tape. LVN B stated it should not have been taped and the tablet should have been wasted instead. She stated she did not know who taped it or why it was taped. LVN B stated it could be the wrong pill and if given to the resident it could have a negative effect. Interview and observation on 3/26/2025 at 12:30 PM of the medication cart for the station 1 front hall revealed it contained 2 narcotic pill cards with torn protective seals. The Lorazepam 0.5mg pill card contained 23 tablets. Pill compartments #8 and #16 contained round, white tablets with torn seals. The Tramadol 50mg pill card contained 24 tablets. Pill compartment #5 contained a white, oblong tablet with a torn seal. LVN A stated the risks of having the torn seals was that the tablets could pop out, get lost and the resident would lose a pill from that stock. LVN A did not have an answer as to why the seals were torn. LVN A stated she would need to waste the tablets with another nurse. In an interview on 3/26/2025 at 2:30 PM, the DON stated the nurses count the narcotics at the end of every shift and the unit managers will check carts at a minimum once a week. He stated the charge nurses check the narcotics daily. The DON stated tape should not be used and expected the nurses to report torn seals immediately to the DON or manager. He stated this was the first time he had ever heard of tape being used. The DON stated once the backing is damaged, the pill could drop out. He stated the cards are factory sealed and it cannot be accounted for if a pill falls out. He stated the seal may prevent it from falling and anything could get inside the compartment if the seal is torn. He stated the residents must be protected from harm of an unknown pill and to avoid any problems the pills should be wasted if the back of the package was compromised. Record review of the narcotic log sheets for the Lorazepam 0.5mg and Tramadol 50mg in the Station 1 medication cart for the front hall revealed the count was correct. Record review of the facility's policy for Controlled Substances, revised on 08/2020, read in part: Medications classified as controlled substances by the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) are subject to special handling, storage, disposal, and recordkeeping in the facility in accordance with state and federal laws and regulations .Procedures . 3. All controlled substances, Schedule II-V, are stored and maintained in a locked cabinet or compartment .5. Accurate inventory of all controlled medications is maintained at all times .
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitche...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for dietary services, in that: The facility failed to ensure the ice machine was free from personal drink items (bottled water) within the stored ice. These failures could place residents at risk for food borne illness. The findings included: During an observation/interview on 03/25/2025 at 08:43 a.m., of the kitchen's initial tour, 1 of 1 ice machines contained a bottled water buried under the ice. Once identified, the Dietary Manager (DM) used the ice scooper and scooped out an 8oz bottle of water. The DM stated that the bottled water should not have been within the ice. He stated he was not aware of who placed the bottled water within the ice. He stated that the reason items were not to be within the ice was to prevent contaminated. Next to the ice machine was a cart full of various beverages all containing ice for the morning meal. He stated that he would inform maintenance to come empty and clean the ice machine immediately and he would report the occurrence to the Administrator (ADM). He stated there was no place in the kitchen area for staff to store food/beverages. He stated that staff do however have an employee breakroom where they were able to store food and drinks. He stated that he would provide a policy for properly storing food in the kitchen. During an interview on 03/25/2025 at 01:03 p.m., both the DM and the Corporate DM stated that they had performed in-services on keeping the ice machine free from items including personal drinks amongst the ice in the ice machine. The Corporate DM stated that maintenance had empty, cleaned, and sanitized the ice machine and she had informed the ADM that the in-service had been completed. She stated that any staff not on shift would have an in-service upon starting their shifts. The DM stated that negative outcomes of storing items in the ice would be contamination, that could compromise resident's immune systems and risk stomach infections. He stated that the kitchen staff had been informed that they were to store personal food and drink items in the employee breakroom, in lockers in the kitchen area, and if staff needed to keep a drink nearby for hydration, they could keep a drink in the DM's office on his desk. During an interview on 03/28/25 at 05:52 p.m., the ADM stated that it was her expectations that all individuals follow proper storage protocol and keep items whether they be personal or food service items in the proper designated place. She stated failure to follow protocols could result in the ice encountering items (bottled waters), the ice becoming non-usable, and requiring that the entire ice machine contents to be disposed of. She stated therefore that items not come into contact with any of the ice in the ice machine. Record review of in-service dated 03/25/2025 instructed by the Corporate DM reflected the in-service topic: Ice Machine and Summary of Subject Material Covered: Drinks Should Not Be Put in the Ice Machines. Record review of Policy titled Food: Safe Handling for Foods from Visitor revised dated 05/2017 revealed: Policy Statement Residents will be assisted in properly storing and safely consuming food brought into the facility for residents by visitors. Procedures 1. The facility staff will request that visitors bringing in food, and/or residents that receive food, must notify a member of the nursing or activities departments. 2. The responsible facility staff member will determine whether the food item is for immediate consumption or to be stored for later use. 3. When food items are for immediate consumption the responsible facility staff member will: . 4. When food items are intended for later consumption, the responsible facility staff member will: o Ensure that the food is stored separate or easily distinguishable from the facility food. o Ensure that foods are in a sealed container to prevent cross contamination. o Label foods with the resident name and the current date. o Determine if food items are shelf stable and whether they can be stored in the resident room or stored under refrigeration . Record review of policy titled Food Storage: Dry Food revised dated 05/2017 revealed: Policy Statement All dry goods will be appropriately stored will be appropriately stored in accordance with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Food Code .
Feb 2024 3 deficiencies 3 IJ (3 affecting multiple)
CRITICAL (K) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident was free from neglect for one (R...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident was free from neglect for one (Resident #1) of eight residents whose records were reviewed for abuse and neglect. The facility failed to supervise Resident #3 and Resident #2, which ended in an unwitnessed resident to resident altercation. Resident #3 was struck on the head with a trashcan and sustained a laceration and hematoma to the forehead which required a hospital visit. On 02/14/24 at 10:45 am an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified. While the IJ was removed on 02/17/24, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of pattern and a severity level of no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that was not an Immediate Jeopardy, due to the facility continuing to monitor the implementation and effectiveness their Plan of Removal. This failure affected 2 residents and could place 13 residents who require supervision inside the memory care unit at risk for abuse, neglect, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included: Resident #2 Record Review of Resident #2's face sheet revealed an eighty-four-year-old man who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His admitting diagnoses were schizoaffective disorder (a mental health condition including schizophrenia and mood disorder symptoms), generalized anxiety disorder, and hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol). Record review of Resident #2's care plan (completed 7/20/23, revised 01/15/24) revealed that he was incontinent, had a communication problem, had acute/chronic pain, and was a wanderer and elopement risk. No focus areas specified anything regarding resident behaviors. Record review of Resident #2's progress notes revealed the following: 07/26/23: Resident roommate is in dining room eating dinner. And Resident #2 is sitting on roommate bed eating his dinner. Writer explains to resident that's not his bed. Resident #2 states fuck this shit, I can stay in this bed, you can't tell me what the fuck to do! Staff redirects resident, but resident still refuses to go his own bed. Resident #2 states This is my place and all these beds is mine! Writer notifies Administrator of Resident #2 non-compliance to go his own bed. And Resident #2 is getting agitated with staff. Roommate moved to other room due to roommate Resident #2s refusal to go to his own bed. 09/04/23: Resident in Room and resident very territorial about his room. Even if resident just comes to his doorway. Resident begins to curse stating quotation I don't want any of you bitches coming in my room!. Staff has to redirect resident. Resident states to staff I'm going to kick all you mother fuckers ass!. Staff has to redirect resident. Staff was trying to pick up resident dinner tray from his room. And resident refused to allow staff in room. Resident sat stuff on floor in room, blocking staff from trying to pick up his finished dinner tray in room. Staff again redirected resident. Resident remained verbally combative towards staff. Staff will continue to redirect and monitor. 9/14/23: Staff has to redirect resident. Resident forgets what side room is on. Resident denies he lives here; staff again redirect their resident. Resident verbally combative towards staff and using profane language too; staff will continue to redirect and monitor. 10/04/23: Resident stayed in his room asleep all through the night. Earlier during change of shift walking rounds, observed resident blocked his door with bedside table and by opening the rest room door, puts a sling on the door making it difficult to open. He mentioned that he don't like other residents wandering into his room and that's why he wants the door closed. Staff encouraged resident not to put ant thing that will make it difficulty in opening the door for his own safety as well, staff will keep an eye on other residents as to not wander into his room and if by any chance, any resident wanders into his room, to use his call button to call on staff who will assist in getting unwelcomed resident out of his room of which he agreed to. 10/27/23: Other male resident from other room on station D wandered into room A. Resident #2 yelling at the resident to get out of his room. Staff intervenes to get other resident out of room. When resident #2 picks-up a plastic hanger and starts swinging the hanger towards the staff members only yelling you bitches get the fuck out my room! Writer explains to resident #2 of trying to get other resident out of his room, please be patient. Writer and staff continue to attempt to remove other resident from room. And resident #2 continues to swing plastic hanger toward staff members only referring to staff members as Bitches, Ugly [NAME]! Finally staff able to remove other resident from room and transfer back to their room. Resident #2 didn't exhibit any physical aggression of swinging hanger toward resident; physical aggression of swinging plastic hanger directed only towards staff members; will continue to monitor. 11/03/23: Staff reports that resident is much calmer but at a time has exhibited threatening behavior including cursing and swinging plastic hangers at staff during intervention with another resident. Met With resident who is alert, able to let staff know of his needs, talking in a very long time, requires assistance and cuing with ADL and encouragement to take his meds. Educated him to refrain from threatening with an object and he doesn't recall any verbal or physical behavior and sits in day area and participates in activities when encouraged. He is under the services of HCGP, message left related to his behavior and referral for further evaluation and treatment. Resident is under psych/ nurse practitioner care for medication and referral to senior psychology for psychological services and to manage plan. Resident to remain in memory care due to wandering risk, full code and LTC. No DC plan. Staff to approach in a calm and non-threatening monitor and redirect as needed. 11/15/23: resident refuses to take shower according to CNA. Resident frequently urinates on the floor in his room period no other behaviors noted. 11/17/23: resident refused to take shower/bath. Writer explained the importance of bathing but residents still refused. 11/20/23: resident refused morning medication despite writer explaining importance of them. Has tendency to spit out medication after putting them in his mouth. Resident currently in his room will continue to monitor. 01/14/24: staff report that Resident #2 was involved in a physical altercation with another resident and placed under behavioral and safety monitoring. The resident has a long history of mental disorders including paranoid schizophrenia and mood disorder but med intervention in progress. Due to his current behavior, he may need further evaluation for placing self and others in danger. Social workers spoke to behavioral staff to assess for possible inpatient eval and treatment for current signs of mental illness. Behavioral hospital accepted him for care. Nursing notified as accepting psychiatrist, accepting administrator to get transportation and transfer resident to behavioral hospital. Record review of the facility's self-reported incidents in the last 30 days revealed: 01/07/24 at 2pm: Resident #2 and another resident were tugging back and forth over piece of clothing that came from Resident #2's room, when Resident #2 stumbled backwards and hit his head on the door. Resident was admitted to the hospital with traumatic brain injury assault with brain bleed called subdural hemorrhage (bleeding between the brain and the skull) and subarachnoid hemorrhage (bleeding in the space between the brain and the surrounding membrane). 01/14/23 at 8:50 am: Upon investigation, it was discovered that there was blood leading from Resident #2's room where Resident #3 was found lying down. There was blood in Resident #2's room as well as on the side and bottom of his trash can. Resident #3 does wander into other rooms from time to time and Resident #2 does not want anyone in his room. Resident #3 was found in another room laying down on the floor bleeding and was struck in the face. Laceration (deep cut or tear in skin) to forehead with indentation and hematoma (injury where blood collects and pool under skin), swollen nose with discoloration, skin tear to left cheek, and right foot great toe skin tear. No fractures reported by hospital. In an interview on 01/26/24 at 10:48 am, Unit Manager stated that since she was promoted into the Unit Manager in November 2023, Resident #2 refused care and was sometimes aggressive with staff, but he was doing well before his most recently reported incident on 01/14/24. Resident #2 was mild mannered and could sometimes be easy to redirect. The unit manager was not aware if Resident #2 had any behavioral ticks and stated that he was in a room without a roommate by chance and not for any specific reason. In an interview on 01/26/24 at 10:53 am, the Unit Manager stated that the facility staff did care plan meetings everyday where they discuss the needs of different residents with the social worker, nurse, and therapist if they were in therapy. The Unit Manager explained that she was responsible for making acute (day to day changes/trends) to the care plan, while each dept head had their own sections for updates. When asked when was the last care plan meeting she attended, she stated that she could not recall attending one for the year of 2024. She explained that the facility had changes in management, and they were working on getting all care plans updated. The Unit manager also stated that the importance of a comprehensive care plan was to outline the care that residents need and to give the floor staff a path for how they were to care for residents. In an interview on 01/26/24 at 11:12 am with CNA A, she stated that Resident #2 was aggressive and thought the facility was his house. Sometimes he would have good days, but he often would get upset or triggered when people would enter his room. She explained that in the past he would try and kick his roommates out, so Resident #2 was now housed in a private room. In an interview on 01/26/24 at 12:48 pm, MDS A stated the Resident #2's care plan was not completed. She explained that she had opened his care plan to begin updates, but because he was sent out of the facility on 1/14/24 to a behavioral hospital, no one had signed or reviewed his plan of care. MDS A stated that the Unit Manager is responsible for updating the day-to-day changes in resident behaviors in the care plan. For quarterly care plans, MDS A stated that she liked to leave the care plan open for three months post the completion date so that each department head would have enough time to develop or revise the care plan. After the care plan had been revised, the social worker would reach out to the responsible party of the resident and schedule a care plan meeting in person or over the phone. MDS A explained that updates to the care plan are not her responsibility, but she was helping to get the facility up to date. Her priorities were MDS assessments, and she presented to the investigator her MDS assessments, which were last completed in November or December of 2023. Resident #3 Record Review of Resident #3's face sheet revealed a ninety-two-year-old woman admitted on [DATE]. Her admitting diagnoses were hypertension (high blood pressure), adult failure to thrive, dementia (memory loss), and cognitive communication deficit. Record review of Resident #3's care plan (revised 01/19/24) revealed that she had a diagnosis of insomnia, had a behavior problem of sitting on the floor with her legs crossed, and she was at risk for wandering related to cognitive communication deficit, dementia. Interventions for wandering included to distract resident with pleasant diversions, provide structured activities, reorientation, and identify pattern of wandering. Record review of Resident #3's progress notes revealed that on 12/30/23 and 01/05/24, resident had to be redirected more than once for wandering the unit common areas and into resident rooms. Record review of the facility's self-reported incident in the last 30 days revealed that on 01/14/23 at 8:50 am: Upon investigation, it was discovered that there was blood leading from Resident #2's room where Resident #3 was found lying down. There was blood in Resident #2's room as well as on the side and bottom of his trash can. Resident #3 does wander into other rooms from time to time and Resident #2 does not want anyone in his room. Resident #3 was found in another room laying down on the floor bleeding and was struck in the face. Laceration (deep cut or tear in skin) to forehead with indentation and hematoma (injury where blood collects and pool under skin), swollen nose with discoloration, skin tear to left cheek, and right foot great toe skin tear. No fractures reported by hospital. In an interview with Unit Manager on 01/26/24 at 10:53 am, she stated that Resident #3 was a wanderer with no history of aggression. Her room was located the opposite side of where she was found on 01/14/24. In an interview on 01/26/24 at 11:12 am with CNA A, she stated that Resident #2 was aggressive and thought the facility was his house. Sometimes he would have good days, but he often would get upset or triggered when people would enter his room. She explained that in the past he would try and kick his roommates out, so Resident #2 was now housed in a private room. She stated that on 01/14/24, Resident #2 was in his room waiting for breakfast and Resident #3 had wandered into his room while she was in a different resident's room, getting them up for breakfast. Resident #2 resided in the very last room on that hall, and he normally would eat his breakfast in solitude inside his room. CNA A said that she did see Resident #3 sitting on the floor of another resident's room (a care planned behavior), but she immediately did not do anything because she did not see any signs of distress and that is what she does. After she finished assisting another resident, she went down the hall to redirect Resident #3 and saw that she was bleeding from her head. She followed a trail of blood across the hall to Resident #2's room and saw that there was blood on the trash can. CNA A called the nurse and Resident #3 was assessed and sent out to the hospital for evaluation. Resident #2 was sent out that day to a behavioral health hospital for medication review and a psychiatric evaluation. The other nurses in the memory care unit did not see the incident and were passing morning medications at that time and no one heard any yells or noises from an altercation. Record review of the facility's policy titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person- Centered, revised March 2022, displayed: 1. The comprehensive, person-centered care plan: a. includes measurable objectives and time frames; b. describes the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, including: (1) services that would otherwise be provided for the above, but are not provided due to the resident exercising his or her rights, including the right to refuse treatment; (3) which professional services are responsible for each element of care; c. includes the resident's stated goals upon admission and desired outcomes; d. builds on the resident's strengths; and e. reflects currently recognized standards of practice for problem areas and conditions. 2. Care plan interventions are chosen only after data gathering, proper sequencing of events, careful consideration of the relationship between the resident's problem areas and their causes, and relevant clinical decision making. 3. When possible, interventions address the underlying source(s) of the problem area(s), not just symptoms or triggers. 4. Assessments of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the residents and the residents' conditions change. 5. The interdisciplinary team reviews and updates the care plan: a. when there has been a significant change in the resident's condition; b. when the desired outcome is not met; c. when the resident has been readmitted to the facility from a hospital stay; and d. at least quarterly, in conjunction with the required quarterly MDS assessment. 6. The resident has the right to refuse to participate in the development of his/her care plan and medical and nursing treatments. Such refusals are documented in the resident's clinical record in accordance with established policies. This was determined to be an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 02/14/24 at 10:45 am. The Admin and Corporate Nurse (CN) were notified. The Admin and Corporate Nurse (CN) were provided with the IJ template on 2/14/24 at approximately 10:45 am. The following POR (Plan of removal) submitted by the facility was accepted on 02/16/24 at 01:45 pm. The POR documented: The facility failed: to supervise resident #3 from wandering into resident #2 rooms where she was injured and had to be sent to the hospital. Immediate action: resident #3 discharged to the hospital and resident #2 was sent to Oceans behavioral hospital for evaluation and treatment 1-14-2024. Resident #3 has been discharged not to return discharged on 1-14-2024. Resident #2 is stable and has not had any further behaviors went to Oceans Behavioral hospital on 1-14-24 and returned on 1-26-2024. Audit on the memory care unit initiated on 2-14-2024 by the in house MDS nurse. 30 residents reside on the memory care unit. The corporate MDS nurse came in on 2/15/2024 to assist with the audit process. All residents on the memory care unit have potential to wander. 13 out of 30 residents identified actively wander in the unit. The care plans for these 13 residents were reviewed and updated. 2/16/2024 Staffing Ratios were reviewed to ensure the facility has adequate staffing ratios. Staffing Ratios for the Memory Care Unit-3 aides 2 nurses and 1 activity staff on unit for increased supervision. This is the normal staffing pattern on the memory Care unit. o 6-2 (3 aides and 2 nurses 1 activity) o 2-10 (3 aides 2 nurses, activity leaves at 6pm) o 10-6 (one nurse and 2 aides) 2/15/2024 Regional MDS coordinator in facility to assist with identifying residents with wandering behaviors to ensure appropriate care planning is in place and accurate. 2/15/2024 Review of the SOM 689 accidents hazards/supervision/devices/with the Clinical team on 2/16/2024 at 0900 the department heads and the clinical team reviewed on the big screen TV the 689 regulation to validate 2-15-2024. This will be accomplished by reading the regulation in full and the critical pathway for Accidents will be reviewed verbally as a team. This will ensure that we have all the elements of training covered in the Pathway and additional training needed if necessary. Medical Director was notified on 2/14/2024 of IJ 689 Follow up with the medical director on 2/15/2024 @ 8:15am on IJ status. AD Hoc QAPI to be held 2/16/2024 with F-689 and SOC update on IJ reviews. An in-service initiated by the memory care RN, ADON - for increased monitoring of wandering residents, in the dining areas, and common areas and re-direction of the resident. All staff on 100-200-and 300 halls were in-serviced because the staff at any given moment could float to another unit. Central Supply and medical records assigned to assist with daily rounding in the unit until all walkie talkies are in place 2-14-2024 to 2-16-2024. New Weekend Supervisor starting on 2/17/2024 to provide supervisory coverage of the buildings on the weekends, 16-hour shifts. Both ladies are already assigned ambassadors to the memory care unit. They round before the morning meeting. After the morning meeting After Lunch And before they leave for the day Both offices are located in the same vicinity of the memory care unit. Walkie talkies (ordered on 2/15/2024) to be delivered on 2/16/2024: to be used by the aides and the nurses to communicate with each other. when a resident wanders from the group setting, during rounds, in passing etc. so that the all staff will be able to keep closer monitoring on the wandering residents. 3 Walkie talkies are being charged for use on 2/15/204 and the other 5 are being delivered on 2/16/2024. Monitoring form initiated for rounds every hour to ensure that nurses can document that they are monitoring and rounding in the unit .at night the nurse will continue with the monitoring while the resident is asleep. 2/15/2024 we will continue the monitoring until we receive the equipment on 2/16/2024 and will continue the rounding until the staff is using the walkie talkies appropriately. CN completed the initial training with the nurses and aides on the use of the walkie talkies . 2 placed on 300 once sufficiently charged. Completion date of training will be completed on 2/16/2024. Following acceptance of the facility's Plan of Removal, the facility was monitored from 02/16/24 to 02/17/24. Monitoring of the plan of removal included: The surveyor confirmed the facility implemented their plan of removal sufficiently from 02/16/24 - 02/17/24 to remove the IJ by: Monitoring Day 1: 02/16/24 Record review of the care plans for residents on the MC unit who have the potential to wander (13) were updated and made available for care staff on PCC through the kiosk. Record review of the in-services conducted 02/13/24 on F-0656 Develop and Implement Comprehensive Care Plans displayed 14 of 14 management, nursing staff, and assistant nursing directors, the social worker, and therapy department heads were educated. Record review of Resident #2's care plan documented that Resident #2 had the potential to be physically aggressive related to history of harm to others and poor impulse control. Interventions included to utilize behavior interventions to manage episodic behaviors, engage calmy in conversation, guide away from source of distress, and intervene before agitation escalates. Care plan also stated the goal for Resident #2 would be no harming of himself or others through the review date. Care plan documented that the resident had the potential to be verbally aggressive and listed interventions such as assess and anticipate resident needs, allow time for the resident to express self and feelings towards the situation, and administer medications as needed. Resident #2 Care plan was updated on 2/12/24. Record review of Resident #2's MDS revealed that this assessment was updated on 01/31/24. In an interview with Resident #2 on 02/14/24 at 11:58am, he stated that he was doing alright and that he was feeling relaxed without any pain. He stated that he vaguely remembered an incident with another resident and a trash can but cannot remember exactly what happened. On 02/15/24 a set of 12 long range rechargeable walkie talkies with batteries were purchased from an online vendor. On 02/16/24, walkie talkies arrived at the facility, were charged, and placed within the MC Unit. Record review of an in-service titled Supervision was started on 02/16/24. This in-service covered reasons why residents wander, hourly rounds on residents and management, redirecting residents who wander, and the use of walkie talkies on the MC Unit. Record review of Resident #2 monitoring sheets displayed that resident was checked every 30 minutes. No new behaviors or changes noted. Record review of newly hired RN weekend supervisor, start date 02/17/24. Sex offender registry, EMR, and license verification report completed. Monitoring Day 2: 02/17/24 Record review of an in-service titled Supervision was completed on 02/17/24. Sign in sheets showed a total of 80 staff who provide direct care or nursing services. In an interview with CNA F on 02/17/24 at 5:30pm, she stated that she worked the 10pm- 6am shift. She was informed on how to use the walkie and the purpose was for staff to be able to monitor residents in the MC Unit who may wander. She explained that sometimes residents will wander because they are looking for family and you may be able to help with a phone call. If a resident is aggressive with another resident, she will intervene to ensure the safety of that resident. If a resident is showing aggression towards herself, she would walk away and reapproach later. In an interview with CNA G on 02/17/24 at 5:35 pm, she stated that she worked the 6pm-2am shift. She explained that a resident may wander because of hunger, or they may need to be changed. If she witnessed this behavior, she would try to redirect them or offer them a snack. She stated she normally worked on a hall without wandering residents, so if she noticed this behavior, she would chart it in PCC and immediately inform her charge nurse. In an interview with CNA H on 02/17/24 at 5:39 pm, she stated that she worked the 2pm- 10pm shift and that she was told to redirect and offer snacks to residents who wander. It was important to know where residents are at all times and wanderers have a wander band that goes off when they come too close the door. If she had a resident that started to walk around aimlessly, she would try to toilet them, offer snacks, and let her charge nurse know. Then she would chart it in PCC. In an interview with LVN B on 02/17/24 at 5:47 pm, she stated that she worked the 6am- 2pm shift. She explained that in the in-service, they talked about the locked unit and that staff was responsible to do checks on residents. They must have a person supervising the MC Unit and they will use the walkies to alert other people that the resident was walking around. The walkie talkies help staff better communicate with each other. In an interview with CNA I on 02/17/24 at 5:53 pm, she stated that she worked the 10pm- 6am shift. She explained that she normally worked the 10pm-2am shift. In the in-services given, she was informed that if she saw a resident wandering, she was to redirect and see if she could meet their needs. She explained that if she noticed a resident on her unit (non MC hall) began to wonder, she would tell her charge nurse immediately of the unusual behavior and chart it in the kiosk. In an interview with LVN C on 02/17/24 at 6:07 pm, she stated that she is a nurse in the MC unit who normally worked the 2pm-10pm shift. She stated that in the in-services, she was taught to redirect all residents who are seen wandering by offering them snacks, toileting, redirection, and assessing pain levels. In an interview with RN A on 02/15/24 at 6:12 pm, he stated that he worked the 2pm to 10pm shift. He explained that if staff saw somebody wondering, they investigate why, and see if they are hungry or want to be changed. Staff will check the diapers to see if they are wet, offer food and snacks, see if they are looking for someone to talk to, or try to find out what they want. The unit was given walkies that work by pushing the side button and talking. MC staff know that his cart is in front of the nurse's station on the MC Unit. If he left to go to another area, MC staff can walkie him. If the aid in the dining area saw a resident in the front room leaving out, all MC staff must acknowledge that that can hear the staff letting them know a resident was on the move and to keep eyes on them. In an interview with LVN D on 02/17/24 at 6:45 pm, she stated that she worked the 6am- 10:30pm shift on Saturday and Sundays. She stated that in the in-service given on 2/16/24, her takeaways were that wandering behaviors in a resident may be related to an underlying factor. Staff should check and see if they resident needs to be changed, offer snacks, monitor their whereabouts, then redirect them. She also explained that the behavior could also be as simple as the resident looking for someone to talk to. She also stated that the MC unit had walkie talkies now, which will help staff communicate on where the residents are and what they may need. In an interview with CNA J on 02/17/24 at 6:50 pm, she stated that she worked the 2pm-10pm shift. She was in serviced on residents who wander and informed to redirect them when this behavior is noticed. She explained that if a resident fights, staff should separate them and try to see if they would like to participate in an activity or if they would like a snack. Immediately after, this behavior should be reported to the nurse and updated on the [NAME] in PCC. The Corporate Nurse was informed the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was removed on 02/17/24 at 7:00 pm. The facility remained out of compliance at a scope of pattern and a severity level of no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that was not an Immediate Jeopardy, due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems that were put into place.
CRITICAL (K) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-center...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that included measurable objectives and time frames to meet residents' mental and psychosocial needs, for two (Resident #2 and #3) of eight residents reviewed for care plans. 1.) The facility failed to update Resident #2's care plan after he demonstrated a history of aggressive behaviors regarding resident care and his personal space to staff and residents. 2.) The facility failed to include that Resident #3 was a fall risk in the care plan. On 02/12/24 at 01:50 pm an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified. While the IJ was removed on 02/15/24, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of pattern and a severity level of no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that was not an Immediate Jeopardy, due to the facility continuing to monitor the implementation and effectiveness of their Plan of Removal. These failures could place residents at risk by not receiving appropriate treatment and services to meet their needs. Findings included: Resident #2 Record Review of Resident #2's face sheet revealed an eighty-four-year-old man who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His admitting diagnoses were schizoaffective disorder (a mental health condition including schizophrenia and mood disorder symptoms), generalized anxiety disorder, and hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol). Record review of Resident #2's care plan (completed 7/20/23, revised 01/15/24) revealed that he was incontinent, had a communication problem, had acute/chronic pain, and was a wanderer and an elopement risk. No focus areas specified anything regarding resident behaviors. Record Review of Resident #2's BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status test, used to get a quick snapshot of a residents cognitive status) revealed a score of 3.0 on a scale range from 1.0- 15.0. Record review of Resident #2's progress notes revealed the following: 07/26/23 documented by a nurse (name unknown): Resident roommate is in dining room eating dinner. And Resident #2 is sitting on roommate bed eating his dinner. Writer explains to resident that's not his bed. Resident #2 states fuck this shit, I can stay in this bed, you can't tell me what the fuck to do! Staff redirects resident, but resident still refuses to go his own bed. Resident #2 states This is my place and all these beds is mine! Writer notifies Administrator of Resident #2 non-compliance to go his own bed. And Resident #2 is getting agitated with staff. Roommate moved to other room due to roommate Resident #2s refusal to go to his own bed. 09/04/23 documented by a nurse (name unknown): Resident in Room and resident very territorial about his room. Even if resident just comes to his doorway. Resident begins to curse stating quotation I don't want any of you bitches coming in my room!. Staff has to redirect resident. Resident states to staff I'm going to kick all you mother fuckers ass!. Staff has to redirect resident. Staff was trying to pick up resident dinner tray from his room. And resident refused to allow staff in room. Resident sat stuff on floor in room, blocking staff from trying to pick up his finished dinner tray in room. Staff again redirected resident. Resident remained verbally combative towards staff. Staff will continue to redirect and monitor. 9/14/23 documented by a nurse (name unknown): Staff has to redirect resident. Resident forgets what side room is on. Resident denies he lives here; staff again redirect their resident. Resident verbally combative towards staff and using profane language too; staff will continue to redirect and monitor. 10/04/23 documented by a nurse (name unknown): Resident stayed in his room asleep all through the night. Earlier during change of shift walking rounds, observed resident blocked his door with bedside table and by opening the rest room door, puts a sling on the door making it difficult to open. He mentioned that he don't like other residents wandering into his room and that's why he wants the door closed. Staff encouraged resident not to put ant thing that will make it difficulty in opening the door for his own safety as well, staff will keep an eye on other residents as to not wander into his room and if by any chance, any resident wanders into his room, to use his call button to call on staff who will assist in getting unwelcomed resident out of his room of which he agreed to. 10/27/23 documented by a nurse (name unknown): Other male resident from other room on station D wandered into room A. Resident #2 yelling at the resident to get out of his room. Staff intervenes to get other resident out of room. When resident #2 picks-up a plastic hanger and starts swinging the hanger towards the staff members only yelling you bitches get the fuck out my room! Writer explains to resident #2 of trying to get other resident out of his room, please be patient. Writer and staff continue to attempt to remove other resident from room. And resident #2 continues to swing plastic hanger toward staff members only referring to staff members as Bitches, Ugly [NAME]! Finally staff able to remove other resident from room and transfer back to their room. Resident #2 didn't exhibit any physical aggression of swinging hanger toward resident; physical aggression of swinging plastic hanger directed only towards staff members; will continue to monitor. 11/03/23 documented by the Social Worker: Staff reports that resident is much calmer but at a time has exhibited threatening behavior including cursing and swinging plastic hangers at staff during intervention with another resident. Met with resident who is alert, able to let staff know of his needs, talking in a very long time, requires assistance and cuing with ADL and encouragement to take his meds. Educated him to refrain from threatening with an object and he doesn't recall any verbal or physical behavior and sits in day area and participates in activities when encouraged. He is under the services of guardianship program message left related to his behavior and referral for further evaluation and treatment. Resident is under psych/ nurse practitioner care for medication and referral to senior psychology for psychological services and to manage plan. Resident to remain in memory care due to wandering risk, full code and LTC. No DC plan. Staff to approach in a calm and non-threatening monitor and redirect as needed. 11/15/23 documented by a nurse (name unknown): resident refuses to take shower according to CNA. Resident frequently urinates on the floor in his room period no other behaviors noted. 11/17/23 documented by a nurse (name unknown): resident refused to take shower/bath. Writer explained the importance of bathing but residents still refused. 11/20/23 documented by a nurse (name unknown): resident refused morning medication despite writer explaining importance of them. Has tendency to spit out medication after putting them in his mouth. Resident currently in his room will continue to monitor. 01/14/24 documented by the Social Worker: staff report that Resident #2 was involved in a physical altercation with another resident and placed under behavioral and safety monitoring. The resident has a long history of mental disorders including paranoid schizophrenia and mood disorder but med intervention in progress. Due to his current behavior, he may need further evaluation for placing self and others in danger. Social workers spoke to behavioral staff to assess for possible inpatient eval and treatment for current signs of mental illness. Behavioral hospital accepted him for care. Nursing notified as accepting psychiatrist, accepting administrator to get transportation and transfer resident to behavioral hospital. Record review of the facility's self-reported incidents in the last 30 days revealed: 01/07/24 at 2pm: Resident #2 and another resident were tugging back and forth over a piece of clothing that came from Resident #2's room, when Resident #2 stumbled backwards and hit his head on the door. Resident #2 was admitted to the hospital with traumatic brain injury assault with brain bleed called subdural hemorrhage (bleeding between the brain and the skull) and subarachnoid hemorrhage (bleeding in the space between the brain and the surrounding membrane). 01/14/23 at 8:50 am: Upon investigation, it was discovered that there was blood leading from Resident #2's room where Resident #3 was found lying down. There was blood in Resident #2's room as well as on the side and bottom of his trash can. Resident #3 does wander into other rooms from time to time and Resident #2 does not want anyone in his room. Resident #3 was found in another room laying down on the floor bleeding and was struck in the face. Laceration (deep cut or tear in skin) to forehead with indentation and hematoma (injury where blood collects and pool under skin), swollen nose with discoloration, skin tear to left cheek, and right foot, great toe skin tear. No fractures reported by the hospital. Record review of Resident #2's psychiatric evaluation visit dated 01/03/24 revealed that there had been no changes in behaviors since his GDR of sertraline. Resident had been calm and no mood adjustments. In the care plan recommendations, it stated that the resident was not an acute danger to himself or others, but this may change due to psycho stressors and treatment compliance. Other recommendations included managing the resident's environment, utilizing behavior interventions for episodic behavior, and provide supportive encouragement to increase socialization. In an interview on 01/26/24 at 10:48 am, the Unit Manager stated that since she was promoted into the Unit Manager role in November 2023, Resident #2 refused care and was sometimes aggressive with staff, but he was doing well before his most recently reported incident on 01/14/24. Resident #2 was mild mannered and could sometimes be easy to redirect. The unit manager was not aware if Resident #2 had any behavioral ticks and stated that he was in a room without a roommate by chance and not for any specific reason. In an interview on 01/26/24 at 10:53 am, the Unit Manager stated that the facility staff did care plan meetings everyday where they discuss the needs of different residents with the social worker, nurses, and therapist if they were in therapy. The Unit Manager explained that she was responsible for making acute (day to day changes/trends) to the care plan, while each department head had their own sections for updates. She stated that she could not recall attending a care plan meeting for the year of 2024. She explained that the facility had changes in management, and they were working on getting all care plans updated. The Unit manager also stated that the importance of a comprehensive care plan was to outline the care that residents needed and to give the floor staff a path for how they were to care for residents. In an interview on 01/26/24 at 11:12 am with CNA A, she stated that Resident #2 was aggressive and thought the facility was his house. Sometimes he would have good days, but he often would get upset or triggered when people would enter his room. She explained that in the past he would try and kick his roommates out, so Resident #2's roommate was placed in a different room and he was now housed in a private room. In an interview on 01/26/24 at 12:48 pm, MDS A stated that Resident #2's care plan was not completed. She explained that she had opened his care plan to begin updates, but because he was sent out of the facility on 1/14/24 to a behavioral hospital, no one had signed or reviewed his plan of care. MDS A stated that the Unit Manager was responsible for updating the day-to-day changes in resident behaviors in the care plan. For quarterly care plans, MDS A stated that she liked to leave the care plan open for three months post the completion date so that each department head would have enough time to develop or revise the care plan. After the care plan had been revised, the social worker would reach out to the responsible party of the resident and schedule a care plan meeting in person or over the phone. MDS A explained that updates to the care plan were not her responsibility, but she was helping to get the facility up to date. Her priorities were MDS assessments, and she presented to the state investigator her MDS assessments, which were last completed in November or December of 2023. Resident #3 Record Review of Resident #3's face sheet revealed a ninety-two-year-old woman admitted on [DATE]. Her admitting diagnoses were hypertension (high blood pressure), adult failure to thrive, dementia (memory loss), and cognitive communication deficit. Record review of Resident #3's care plan (revised 01/19/24) revealed that she had diagnoses of insomnia, has a behavior problem of sitting on the floor with her legs crossed, and she was at risk for wandering related to cognitive communication deficit, dementia. No focus area was initiated for falls. Record review of Resident #3's Fall risk evaluation (ranged 1.0- 15.0) revealed the following: 1/14/2024 N Adv - Fall Risk Evaluation at Risk 10.0 12/28/2023 N Adv - Fall Risk Evaluation No risk 2.0 12/27/2023 N Adv - Fall Risk Evaluation at Risk 13.0 12/27/2023 N Adv - Fall Risk Evaluation at Risk 14.0 12/25/2023 N Adv - Fall Risk Evaluation at Risk 10.0 12/25/2023 N Adv - Fall Risk Evaluation at Risk 11.0 8/20/2023 N Adv - Fall Risk Evaluation at Risk 14.0 Record review of the facility's Incident and Accident Log from 08/24/23- 01/24/24 for Resident #3 revealed: Injury of Unknown Origin Cause Incidents 09/10/23 12/25/23 Other incidents 01/14/24 In an interview on 01/26/24 at 10:53 am with the Unit Manager, she stated that Resident #3 was a fall risk. In an interview on 01/26/24 at 11:22 am with CNA A, she stated that Resident #3 was a fall risk. In an interview on 01/26/24 at 10:53 am, the Unit Manager stated that the facility staff did care plan meetings everyday where they discuss the needs of different residents with the social worker, nurses, and therapist if they were in therapy. The Unit Manager explained that she was responsible for making acute (day to day changes/trends) to the care plan, while each department head had their own sections for updates. She stated that she could not recall attending a care plan meeting for the year of 2024. She explained that the facility had changes in management, and they were working on getting all care plans updated. Since the Unit Manager had gotten her promotion to this role in 11/2023, she had not noticed any behavior issues with Resident #2. The Unit manager stated that the importance of a comprehensive care plan was to outline the care that residents needed and to give the floor staff a path for how they were to care for residents. In an interview on 01/26/24 at 12:39 pm, MDS A stated that when she started at the facility in September 2023, that a lot of care plans had not been completed in some time due to a gap in employment. MDS A stated that the Unit Manager is responsible for updating the day-to-day changes in resident behaviors in the care plan. For quarterly care plans, MDS A stated that she liked to leave the care plan open for three months post the completion date so that each department head would have enough time to develop or revise the care plan. After the care plan had been revised, the social worker would reach out to the responsible party of the resident, and schedule a care plan meeting in person or over the phone. MDS A explained that updates to the care plan were not her responsibility, but she was helping to get the facility up to date. Her priorities were MDS assessments, and she presented to the state investigator her MDS assessments, which were last completed in November or December of 2023. In an interview on 01/26/24 at 3:38 pm with the Admin, she stated that she had been employed at the facility since December of 2023. She explained that she was aware that care plans were behind and that the facility had implemented a PIP to get back on track. The Unit Manager of each unit was responsible for updating the care plan with day-to-day changes while each department head was to update the other sections (activities, nursing, dietary, and therapy). She explained that the harm in not having updated care plans was that staff would not have special instructions to handle the needs of each resident. Record review of the facility's policy titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person- Centered, revised March 2022, displayed: 1. The comprehensive, person-centered care plan: a. includes measurable objectives and time frames; b. describes the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, including: (1) services that would otherwise be provided for the above, but are not provided due to the resident exercising his or her rights, including the right to refuse treatment; (3) which professional services are responsible for each element of care; c. includes the resident's stated goals upon admission and desired outcomes; d. builds on the resident's strengths; and e. reflects currently recognized standards of practice for problem areas and conditions. 2. Care plan interventions are chosen only after data gathering, proper sequencing of events, careful consideration of the relationship between the resident's problem areas and their causes, and relevant clinical decision making. 3. When possible, interventions address the underlying source(s) of the problem area(s), not just symptoms or triggers. 4. Assessments of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the residents and the residents' conditions change. 5. The interdisciplinary team reviews and updates the care plan: a. when there has been a significant change in the resident's condition; b. when the desired outcome is not met; c. when the resident has been readmitted to the facility from a hospital stay; and d. at least quarterly, in conjunction with the required quarterly MDS assessment. 6. The resident has the right to refuse to participate in the development of his/her care plan and medical and nursing treatments. Such refusals are documented in the resident's clinical record in accordance with established policies. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was determined on 02/12/24. The Admin and Corporate Nurse (CN) were notified. The Admin and Corporate Nurse (CN) were provided a template on 2/12/24 at approximately 1:50 pm. The following POR (Plan of removal) submitted by the facility was accepted on 02/14/24 at 10:53 am. The POR documented: The facility failed to care plan and implement interventions for Resident #2 who had behaviors. Immediate action: F0656- Develop and Implement Comprehensive Care Plans Resident #2 Care plan was updated on 2/12/2024. Audit initiated on 2-12-2024 of residents with behaviors to determine that their plan of care is accurate with interventions. The Nurse Managers, the MDS team, the social workers, the wound care nurse identified 33 care plans for residents with identified behaviors and are in the process of being reviewed. Completion 2/14/2024. The MDS team, ADON#1, ADON#2, ADON#3, the Wound Care Coordinator, the Social Worker, Activities, Dietary, and Therapy, were in-serviced on care planning and comprehensive person-centered care, baseline care plans, and review of the State operation Manual F656. 2-12-2023 Chief Nursing Officer. The floor nurses and the aides will be re-educated on the care plan process as well as how to access the resident care plan in PCC as well as the [NAME]. The charge nurse and the aides will be educated on how to notify the DON, the charge nurse, the unit manager, the MDS nurse for any information needed to be added or removed from the plan of care clinical management team. 2-14-2024 The DON/Designee will ensure that care plans are completed timely, the accuracy of the MDS is the responsibility of the person completing the MDS. Care plan will be updated quarterly and as needed with any acute changes prior to the next assessment period. Resident #2 has been readmitted , is stable, and has had no new behaviors. He had medication adjustments in the hospital and was seen by the Geri-med psych team when re-admitted . Resident #3 has been discharged . Medical Director was notified on 2/12/2024. The person-centered comprehensive care plan has been reviewed and updated to reflect Resident #2 current medical, physical, mental, and psychosocial needs and status as of February 12, 2024. An in-service for interdisciplinary team members for the regulatory requirement for developing and implementing comprehensive care plans cited under 42 CFR §483.21(b)(1) was completed on February 12, 2024, by Chief Nursing Officer. A performance improvement plan (PIP) for timely completion and review of care plans was initiated on November 21, 2023, with a target completion date of March 04, 2024. The facility team members are actively engaged in the PIP. As of February 12, 2024, the PIP is ongoing and on track. Following the acceptance of the facility's Plan of Removal, the facility was monitored from 02/14/24 to 02/15/24. Monitoring of the plan of removal included: The surveyor confirmed the facility implemented their plan of removal sufficiently from 02/14/24 - 02/15/24 to remove the IJ by: Monitoring Day 1: 02/14/24 Record review of care plans for 33 residents with behaviors were conducted. All care plans were updated by interdisciplinary teams and the MDS Nurse and MDS Coordinator. Record review of the PIP (Performance Improvement Plan) for timely completion and review of care plans (initiated on November 21, 2023) revealed a target completion date of 03/04/24 and was on track. Record review of the in-services conducted 02/13/24 on F-0656 Develop and Implement Comprehensive Care Plans displayed 14 of 14 management, nursing, and assistant nursing directors, the social worker, and therapy department heads were educated. Record review of the in-services conducted 02/13/24 titled How to access care plans for nurse and CNA's revealed 57 nurses and certified nurse aids were educated on how to log into PCC and review each resident's care plan when assisting with care and specified needs. Record review of Resident #2's care plan documented that Resident #2 had the potential to be physically aggressive related to history of harm to others and poor impulse control. Interventions included to utilize behavior interventions to manage episodic behaviors, engage calmly in conversation, guide away from source of distress, and intervene before agitation escalates. Care plan also stated the goal for Resident #2 would be no harming of himself or others through the review date. Care plan documented that the resident had the potential to be verbally aggressive and listed interventions such as assess and anticipate resident needs, allow time for the resident to express self and feelings towards the situation, and administer medications as needed. Resident #2 Care plan was updated on 2/12/24. Record review of Resident #2's MDS revealed that this assessment was updated on 01/31/24. In an interview with Resident #2 on 02/14/24 at 11:58 am, he stated that he was doing alright and that he was feeling relaxed without any pain. He stated that he vaguely remembered an incident with another resident and a trash can but cannot remember exactly what happened. In an interview with Nurse A on 02/14/24 at 12:03 pm, she stated that she worked in the MC Unit, and she was in-serviced on working with behavior management patients, when to review psychotropic medications, and on admission staff are to do the baseline care plans to monitor and see if Residents have any side effects or any behaviors that need to be addressed. If there is any type of new behavior, staff is to first contact the doctor or the psych nurse if it is a psych related issue. Staff will then do a progress note and we do a change in condition in PCC. She stated that nurses may to have get a new medication order from the doctor, then take it from there. If it is a new behavior that required a new intervention, every 15 minutes staff will do close monitoring of those behaviors. She explained that since Resident #2 has returned, he stays in his room, and has not had any behavior issues. He was prescribed Depakote and that has helped a lot. In an interview with LVN A on 02/14/24 at 12:20 pm in the MC unit, she stated that she had received an in-service on safety and aggressive behaviors. She was taught to redirect residents and calm them down. Anytime we see residents not doing what they were supposed to do, we would alert the DON. We know to let the DON know when the behaviors were a danger to the resident. We don't wait until it gets to the climax but if the behavior is escalating. Staff know to review the shift reports to monitor the progress notes. At the end of every shift, we have a report for each resident. We talk about it nurse to nurse and have the report. Then we just keep our eyes open. In an interview on 02/14/24 at 12:30pm in the MC Unit, she stated that in her in-service, she discussed resident behaviors, and they talked about each individual resident in the MC unit. She was asked to pull up the care plan from the kiosk and did so successfully. She stated that she will report any type of change in behavior pattern to her charge nurse immediately. These behaviors could range from a decline in eating or agitation. Day 2: 02/15/24 In an interview with ADON A on 02/15/24 at 12:45 pm revealed that she was in-serviced on updating acute changes in behaviors for all residents and making sure the interventions were followed through. If there were any changes with residents, care staff were to come to nursing managers directly and they can document it on the kiosk with PCC or on the written form kept at the nurse's station. She explained that she gave an in-service to the nurses and CNA's who were assigned to the 200-hall. This in-service covered how to access the resident care plans by using the kiosk and the facility's new Stop and Watch alert tab located on the kiosk which will allow staff to document any changes in behavior. In an interview on 02/15/24 at 12:52 pm with the WCN, she explained that in the most recent in-service, they went over the protocols for going through the care plans during morning meetings and when the doctor comes. During those meetings, staff will talk about what needs to be updated, if there were any changes in conditions, and make sure all updates re done daily. In an interview on 02/15/24 at 12:58 pm with the MDS Nurse and R-MDS Nurse, the following things were revealed: -Each section of the care plan will be done by the IDT team and they must sign off on it. The care plan is to be done after The MDS assessment. The MDS assessment comes directly from PCC. Once the MDS is completed, we roll it over in the care plan. Anything that is acute, or a change should be updated as it comes in. -All acute documentation should be timely and immediately. Updates should be addressed in the first few hours in the care plan. Interventions can be changed or taken away as needed. -Every week a weekly report will be sent out that goes to the Corporate Nurse, the ADON, and certain team members. R-MDS will pull a report for care plans due for that week or change in conditions from PCC. If past due, the report will be highlighted in red on the dashboard. This will allow all staff to go through and make sure they have their section cleared by the review date. This was started on 01/8/24 to help them focus on their needs for that week. -Once the MDS Coordinator and the MDS nurse receive the report, they communicate with the IDT team via email. The MDS Coordinator will open reviews for those residents and the IDT will go in and update that review. This system has become very effective in care plan completions and getting back on track. -The accuracy of care plans will be ensured during the reviews. Once it is signed, the care plan should reflect the most up to date version of the MDS. The care plan review on the MDS side will be done every 92 days, then they will open the care plan to be reviewed by the IDT staff. In an interview with the AD on 02/15/24 at 01:24 pm, she stated that she was shown how to view the care plan on the kiosk, and she was re-educated on putting more information on the care plan and how to enter it so that all care staff were able to view it on PCC at the kiosk. When there was a change in condition, she will report it to the charge nurse and tell it to the DON and the Admin. The AD stated that she reports both verbally and documents in the progress notes under that resident. She explained that she ensured her part was accurate because she goes through each resident on a list and reviewed their behaviors with the two other staff who work in activities. One activities member who provides direct care with residents was also present to provide firsthand information. In an interview on 02/15/24 with the MC Unit Manager, she stated that all staff were made aware of what their responsibilities were in regard to care planning, including antibiotic therapy, falls, behavior changes, and acute changes. Care plan meetings will be done daily. Staff know to notify the Unit Manager. This should also be notated in the nursing notes. In an interview on 02/15/24 started at 2:17 pm with CNA C, CNA D, CNA E, CNA F, CNA G, CNA H, and CNA I, each CNA was able to pull up resident care plans through PCC using the kiosk. The Corporate Nurse was informed the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was removed on 02/15/24 at 3:12 PM. The facility remained out of compliance at a scope of pattern and a severity level of no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that was not an Immediate Jeopardy, due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems that were put into place.
CRITICAL (K) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Deficiency F0657 (Tag F0657)

Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to review and revise the person-centered care planning for one (Residen...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to review and revise the person-centered care planning for one (Resident #2) of eight residents reviewed for care plan revision. 1. Resident #2's care plan had not been revised to include behavioral triggers and aggression. On 02/12/24 at 01:50 pm an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified. While the IJ was removed on 02/15/24, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of pattern and a severity level of no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that was not an Immediate Jeopardy, due to the facility continuing to monitor the implementation and effectiveness of their Plan of Removal. This failure could place residents at risk for decreased quality of care and quality of life. Findings included: Resident #2 Record Review of Resident #2's face sheet revealed an eighty-four-year-old man who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His admitting diagnoses were schizoaffective disorder (a mental health condition including schizophrenia and mood disorder symptoms), generalized anxiety disorder, and hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol). Record review of Resident #2's care plan (completed 7/20/23, revised 01/15/24) revealed that he was incontinent, had a communication problem, had acute/chronic pain, and was a wanderer and elopement risk. No focus areas specified anything regarding resident behaviors. Record Review of Resident #2's BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status test, used to get a quick snapshot of a residents cognitive status) revealed a score of 3.0 on a scale range from 1.0- 15.0. Record review of Resident #2's progress notes revealed the following: 07/26/23 documented by a nurse (name unknown): Resident roommate is in dining room eating dinner. And Resident #2 is sitting on roommate bed eating his dinner. Writer explains to resident that's not his bed. Resident #2 states fuck this shit, I can stay in this bed, you can't tell me what the fuck to do! Staff redirects resident, but resident still refuses to go his own bed. Resident #2 states This is my place and all these beds is mine! Writer notifies Administrator of Resident #2 non-compliance to go his own bed. And Resident #2 is getting agitated with staff. Roommate moved to other room due to roommate Resident #2s refusal to go to his own bed. 09/04/23 documented by a nurse (name unknown): Resident in Room and resident very territorial about his room. Even if resident just comes to his doorway. Resident begins to curse stating quotation I don't want any of you bitches coming in my room!. Staff has to redirect resident. Resident states to staff I'm going to kick all you mother fuckers ass!. Staff has to redirect resident. Staff was trying to pick up resident dinner tray from his room. And resident refused to allow staff in room. Resident sat stuff on floor in room, blocking staff from trying to pick up his finished dinner tray in room. Staff again redirected resident. Resident remained verbally combative towards staff. Staff will continue to redirect and monitor. 9/14/23 documented by a nurse (name unknown): Staff has to redirect resident. Resident forgets what side room is on. Resident denies he lives here; staff again redirect their resident. Resident verbally combative towards staff and using profane language too; staff will continue to redirect and monitor. 10/04/23 documented by a nurse (name unknown): Resident stayed in his room asleep all through the night. Earlier during change of shift walking rounds, observed resident blocked his door with bedside table and by opening the rest room door, puts a sling on the door making it difficult to open. He mentioned that he don't like other residents wandering into his room and that's why he wants the door closed. Staff encouraged resident not to put ant thing that will make it difficulty in opening the door for his own safety as well, staff will keep an eye on other residents as to not wander into his room and if by any chance, any resident wanders into his room, to use his call button to call on staff who will assist in getting unwelcomed resident out of his room of which he agreed to. 10/27/23 documented by a nurse (name unknown): Other male resident from other room on station D wandered into room A. Resident #2 yelling at the resident to get out of his room. Staff intervenes to get other resident out of room. When resident #2 picks-up a plastic hanger and starts swinging the hanger towards the staff members only yelling you bitches get the fuck out my room! Writer explains to resident #2 of trying to get other resident out of his room, please be patient. Writer and staff continue to attempt to remove other resident from room. And resident #2 continues to swing plastic hanger toward staff members only referring to staff members as Bitches, Ugly [NAME]! Finally staff able to remove other resident from room and transfer back to their room. Resident #2 didn't exhibit any physical aggression of swinging hanger toward resident; physical aggression of swinging plastic hanger directed only towards staff members; will continue to monitor. 11/03/23 documented by the Social Worker: Staff reports that resident is much calmer but at a time has exhibited threatening behavior including cursing and swinging plastic hangers at staff during intervention with another resident. Met with resident who is alert, able to let staff know of his needs, talking in a very long time, requires assistance and cuing with ADL and encouragement to take his meds. Educated him to refrain from threatening with an object and he doesn't recall any verbal or physical behavior and sits in day area and participates in activities when encouraged. He is under the services of guardianship program message left related to his behavior and referral for further evaluation and treatment. Resident is under psych/ nurse practitioner care for medication and referral to senior psychology for psychological services and to manage plan. Resident to remain in memory care due to wandering risk, full code and LTC. No DC plan. Staff to approach in a calm and non-threatening monitor and redirect as needed. 11/15/23 documented by a nurse (name unknown): resident refuses to take shower according to CNA. Resident frequently urinates on the floor in his room period no other behaviors noted. 11/17/23 documented by a nurse (name unknown): resident refused to take shower/bath. Writer explained the importance of bathing but residents still refused. 11/20/23 documented by a nurse (name unknown): resident refused morning medication despite writer explaining importance of them. Has tendency to spit out medication after putting them in his mouth. Resident currently in his room will continue to monitor. 01/14/24 documented by the Social Worker: staff report that Resident #2 was involved in a physical altercation with another resident and placed under behavioral and safety monitoring. The resident has a long history of mental disorders including paranoid schizophrenia and mood disorder but med intervention in progress. Due to his current behavior, he may need further evaluation for placing self and others in danger. Social workers spoke to behavioral staff to assess for possible inpatient eval and treatment for current signs of mental illness. Behavioral hospital accepted him for care. Nursing notified as accepting psychiatrist, accepting administrator to get transportation and transfer resident to behavioral hospital. Record review of the facility's self-reported incidents in the last 30 days revealed: 01/07/24 at 2pm: Resident #2 and another resident were tugging back and forth over a piece of clothing that came from Resident #2's room, when Resident #2 stumbled backwards and hit his head on the door. Resident #2 was admitted to the hospital with traumatic brain injury assault with brain bleed called subdural hemorrhage (bleeding between the brain and the skull) and subarachnoid hemorrhage (bleeding in the space between the brain and the surrounding membrane). 01/14/23 at 8:50 am: Upon investigation, it was discovered that there was blood leading from Resident #2's room where Resident #3 was found lying down. There was blood in Resident #2's room as well as on the side and bottom of his trash can. Resident #3 does wander into other rooms from time to time and Resident #2 does not want anyone in his room. Resident #3 was found in another room laying down on the floor bleeding and was struck in the face. Laceration (deep cut or tear in skin) to forehead with indentation and hematoma (injury where blood collects and pool under skin), swollen nose with discoloration, skin tear to left cheek, and right foot, great toe skin tear. No fractures reported by the hospital. Record review of Resident #2's psychiatric evaluation visit dated 01/03/24 revealed that there had been no changes in behaviors since his GDR of sertraline. Resident had been calm and no mood adjustments. In the care plan recommendations, it stated that the resident was not an acute danger to himself or others, but this may change due to psycho stressors and treatment compliance. Other recommendations included managing the resident's environment, utilizing behavior interventions for episodic behavior, and provide supportive encouragement to increase socialization. In an interview on 01/26/24 at 10:48 am, Unit Manager stated that since she was promoted into the Unit Manager in November 2023, Resident #2 refused care and was sometimes aggressive with staff, but he was doing well before his most recently reported incident on 01/14/24. Resident #2 was mild mannered and could sometimes be easy to redirect. The unit manager was not aware if Resident #2 had any behavioral ticks and stated that he was in a room without a roommate by chance and not for any specific reason. In an interview on 01/26/24 at 10:53 am, the Unit Manager stated that the facility staff did care plan meetings everyday where they discuss the needs of different residents with the social worker, nurse, and therapist if they were in therapy. The Unit Manager explained that she was responsible for making acute (day to day changes/trends) to the care plan, while each dept head had their own sections for updates. When asked when was the last care plan meeting she attended, she stated that she could not recall attending one for the year of 2024. She explained that the facility had changes in management, and they were working on getting all care plans updated. The Unit manager also stated that the importance of a comprehensive care plan was to outline the care that residents need and to give the floor staff a path for how they were to care for residents. In an interview on 01/26/24 at 11:12 am with CNA A, she stated that Resident #2 was aggressive and thought the facility was his house. Sometimes he would have good days, but he often would get upset or triggered when people would enter his room. She explained that in the past he would try and kick his roommates out, so Resident #2 was now housed in a private room. In an interview on 01/26/24 at 12:39 pm, MDS A stated that when she started at the facility in September 2023, that a lot of care plans had not been completed in some time due to a gap in employment. She explained that she implemented a PIP (performance improvement plan) that trained all staff in an attempt to get things back on track. She sent out daily reminders to alert staff on which care plans needed to be updated. MDS A explained that Resident #2's care plan had not been updated because he was sent out of the facility on 1/14/24 to a behavioral hospital and no one had signed or reviewed his plan of care. MDS A stated that the Unit Manager is responsible for updating the day-to-day changes in resident behaviors in the care plan. For quarterly care plans, MDS A stated that she liked to leave the care plan open for three months post the completion date so that each department head would have enough time to develop or revise the care plan. After the care plan had been revised, the social worker would reach out to the responsible party of the resident and schedule a care plan meeting in person or over the phone. MDS A explained that updates to the care plan are not her responsibility, but she was helping to get the facility up to date. Her priorities were MDS assessments, and she presented to the investigator her MDS assessments, which were last completed in November or December of 2023. In an interview on 01/26/24 at 3:38 pm with the Admin, she stated that she had been employed at the facility since December of 2023. She explained that she was aware that care plans were behind and that the facility had implemented a PIP to get back on track. The Unit Manger of each unit was responsible for updating the care plan with day-to-day changes while each department head was to update the other sections (activities, nursing, dietary, therapy). She explained that the harm in not having updated care plans was that staff would not have special instructions to handle the needs of each resident. Record review of the facility's policy titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person- Centered, revised March 2022, displayed: a. Care plan interventions are chosen only after data gathering, proper sequencing of events, careful consideration of the relationship between the resident's problem areas and their causes, and relevant clinical decision making. b. When possible, interventions address the underlying source(s) of the problem area(s), not just symptoms or triggers. c. Assessments of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the residents and the residents' conditions change. d. The interdisciplinary team reviews and updates the care plan: 1. when there has been a significant change in the resident's condition; 2. when the desired outcome is not met; 3. when the resident has been readmitted to the facility from a hospital stay; and 4. at least quarterly, in conjunction with the required quarterly MDS assessment. f. The resident has the right to refuse to participate in the development of his/her care plan and medical and nursing treatments. Such refusals are documented in the resident's clinical record in accordance with established policies. This was determined to be an Immediate Threat (IT) on 02/14/24 at 10:45 am. The Admin and Corporate Nurse (CN) were notified. The Admin and Corporate Nurse (CN) were provided with the IT template on 2/14/24 at approximately 10:45 am. The following POR (Plan of removal) submitted by the facility was accepted on 02/16/24 at 01:45 pm. The POR documented: The facility failed: to supervise resident #3 from wandering into resident #2 rooms where she was injured and had to be sent to the hospital. Immediate action: resident #3 discharged to the hospital and resident #2 was sent to Oceans behavioral hospital for evaluation and treatment 1-14-2024. Resident #3 has been discharged not to return discharged on 1-14-2024. Resident #2 is stable and has not had any further behaviors went to Oceans Behavioral hospital on 1-14-24 and returned on 1-26-2024. Audit on the memory care unit initiated on 2-14-2024 by the in house MDS nurse. 30 residents reside on the memory care unit. The corporate MDS nurse came in on 2/15/2024 to assist with the audit process. All residents on the memory care unit have potential to wander. 13 out of 30 residents identified actively wander in the unit. The care plans for these 13 residents were reviewed and updated. 2/16/2024 Staffing Ratios were reviewed to ensure the facility has adequate staffing ratios. Staffing Ratios for the Memory Care Unit-3 aides 2 nurses and 1 activity staff on unit for increased supervision. This is the normal staffing pattern on the memory Care unit. o 6-2 (3 aides and 2 nurses 1 activity) o 2-10 (3 aides 2 nurses, activity leaves at 6pm) o 10-6 (one nurse and 2 aides) 2/15/2024 Regional MDS coordinator in facility to assist with identifying residents with wandering behaviors to ensure appropriate care planning is in place and accurate. 2/15/2024 Review of the SOM 689 accidents hazards/supervision/devices/with the Clinical team on 2/16/2024 at 0900 the department heads and the clinical team reviewed on the big screen TV the 689 regulation to validate 2-15-2024. This will be accomplished by reading the regulation in full and the critical pathway for Accidents will be reviewed verbally as a team. This will ensure that we have all the elements of training covered in the Pathway and additional training needed if necessary. Medical Director was notified on 2/14/2024 of IJ 689 Follow up with the medical director on 2/15/2024 @ 8:15am on IJ status. AD Hoc QAPI to be held 2/16/2024 with F-689 and SOC update on IJ reviews. An in-service initiated by the memory care RN, ADON - for increased monitoring of wandering residents, in the dining areas, and common areas and re-direction of the resident. All staff on 100-200-and 300 halls were in-serviced because the staff at any given moment could float to another unit. Central Supply and medical records assigned to assist with daily rounding in the unit until all walkie talkies are in place 2-14-2024 to 2-16-2024. New Weekend Supervisor starting on 2/17/2024 to provide supervisory coverage of the buildings on the weekends, 16-hour shifts. Both ladies are already assigned ambassadors to the memory care unit. They round before the morning meeting. After the morning meeting After Lunch And before they leave for the day Both offices are located in the same vicinity of the memory care unit. Walkie talkies (ordered on 2/15/2024) to be delivered on 2/16/2024: to be used by the aides and the nurses to communicate with each other. when a resident wanders from the group setting, during rounds, in passing etc. so that the all staff will be able to keep closer monitoring on the wandering residents. 3 Walkie talkies are being charged for use on 2/15/204 and the other 5 are being delivered on 2/16/2024. Monitoring form initiated for rounds every hour to ensure that nurses can document that they are monitoring and rounding in the unit .at night the nurse will continue with the monitoring while the resident is asleep. 2/15/2024 we will continue the monitoring until we receive the equipment on 2/16/2024 and will continue the rounding until the staff is using the walkie talkies appropriately. CN completed the initial training with the nurses and aides on the use of the walkie talkies . 2 placed on 300 once sufficiently charged. Completion date of training will be completed on 2/16/2024. Following acceptance of the facility's Plan of Removal, the facility was monitored from 02/16/24 to 02/17/24. Monitoring of the plan of removal included: The surveyor confirmed the facility implemented their plan of removal sufficiently from 02/16/24 - 02/17/24 to remove the IJ by: Monitoring Day 1: 02/16/24 Record review of the care plans for residents on the MC unit who have the potential to wander (13) were updated and made available for care staff on PCC through the kiosk. Record review of the in-services conducted 02/13/24 on F-0656 Develop and Implement Comprehensive Care Plans displayed 14 of 14 management, nursing staff, and assistant nursing directors, the social worker, and therapy department heads were educated. Record review of Resident #2's care plan documented that Resident #2 had the potential to be physically aggressive related to history of harm to others and poor impulse control. Interventions included to utilize behavior interventions to manage episodic behaviors, engage calmy in conversation, guide away from source of distress, and intervene before agitation escalates. Care plan also stated the goal for Resident #2 would be no harming of himself or others through the review date. Care plan documented that the resident had the potential to be verbally aggressive and listed interventions such as assess and anticipate resident needs, allow time for the resident to express self and feelings towards the situation, and administer medications as needed. Resident #2 Care plan was updated on 2/12/24. Record review of Resident #2's MDS revealed that this assessment was updated on 01/31/24. In an interview with Resident #2 on 02/14/24 at 11:58am, he stated that he was doing alright and that he was feeling relaxed without any pain. He stated that he vaguely remembered an incident with another resident and a trash can but cannot remember exactly what happened. On 02/15/24 a set of 12 long range rechargeable walkie talkies with batteries were purchased from an online vendor. On 02/16/24, walkie talkies arrived at the facility, were charged, and placed within the MC Unit. Record review of an in-service titled Supervision was started on 02/16/24. This in-service covered reasons why residents wander, hourly rounds on residents and management, redirecting residents who wander, and the use of walkie talkies on the MC Unit. Record review of Resident #2 monitoring sheets displayed that resident was checked every 30 minutes. No new behaviors or changes noted. Record review of newly hired RN weekend supervisor, start date 02/17/24. Sex offender registry, EMR, and license verification report completed. Monitoring Day 2: 02/17/24 Record review of an in-service titled Supervision was completed on 02/17/24. Sign in sheets showed a total of 80 staff who provide direct care or nursing services. In an interview with CNA F on 02/17/24 at 5:30pm, she stated that she worked the 10pm- 6am shift. She was informed on how to use the walkie and the purpose was for staff to be able to monitor residents in the MC Unit who may wander. She explained that sometimes residents will wander because they are looking for family and you may be able to help with a phone call. If a resident is aggressive with another resident, she will intervene to ensure the safety of that resident. If a resident is showing aggression towards herself, she would walk away and reapproach later. In an interview with CNA G on 02/17/24 at 5:35 pm, she stated that she worked the 6pm-2am shift. She explained that a resident may wander because of hunger, or they may need to be changed. If she witnessed this behavior, she would try to redirect them or offer them a snack. She stated she normally worked on a hall without wandering residents, so if she noticed this behavior, she would chart it in PCC and immediately inform her charge nurse. In an interview with CNA H on 02/17/24 at 5:39 pm, she stated that she worked the 2pm- 10pm shift and that she was told to redirect and offer snacks to residents who wander. It was important to know where residents are at all times and wanderers have a wander band that goes off when they come too close the door. If she had a resident that started to walk around aimlessly, she would try to toilet them, offer snacks, and let her charge nurse know. Then she would chart it in PCC. In an interview with LVN B on 02/17/24 at 5:47 pm, she stated that she worked the 6am- 2pm shift. She explained that in the in-service, they talked about the locked unit and that staff was responsible to do checks on residents. They must have a person supervising the MC Unit and they will use the walkies to alert other people that the resident was walking around. The walkie talkies help staff better communicate with each other. In an interview with CNA I on 02/17/24 at 5:53 pm, she stated that she worked the 10pm- 6am shift. She explained that she normally worked the 10pm-2am shift. In the in-services given, she was informed that if she saw a resident wandering, she was to redirect and see if she could meet their needs. She explained that if she noticed a resident on her unit (non MC hall) began to wonder, she would tell her charge nurse immediately of the unusual behavior and chart it in the kiosk. In an interview with LVN C on 02/17/24 at 6:07 pm, she stated that she is a nurse in the MC unit who normally worked the 2pm-10pm shift. She stated that in the in-services, she was taught to redirect all residents who are seen wandering by offering them snacks, toileting, redirection, and assessing pain levels. In an interview with RN A on 02/15/24 at 6:12 pm, he stated that he worked the 2pm to 10pm shift. He explained that if staff saw somebody wondering, they investigate why, and see if they are hungry or want to be changed. Staff will check the diapers to see if they are wet, offer food and snacks, see if they are looking for someone to talk to, or try to find out what they want. The unit was given walkies that work by pushing the side button and talking. MC staff know that his cart is in front of the nurse's station on the MC Unit. If he left to go to another area, MC staff can walkie him. If the aid in the dining area saw a resident in the front room leaving out, all MC staff must acknowledge that that can hear the staff letting them know a resident was on the move and to keep eyes on them. In an interview with LVN D on 02/17/24 at 6:45 pm, she stated that she worked the 6am- 10:30pm shift on Saturday and Sundays. She stated that in the in-service given on 2/16/24, her takeaways were that wandering behaviors in a resident may be related to an underlying factor. Staff should check and see if they resident needs to be changed, offer snacks, monitor their whereabouts, then redirect them. She also explained that the behavior could also be as simple as the resident looking for someone to talk to. She also stated that the MC unit had walkie talkies now, which will help staff communicate on where the residents are and what they may need. In an interview with CNA J on 02/17/24 at 6:50 pm, she stated that she worked the 2pm-10pm shift. She was in serviced on residents who wander and informed to redirect them when this behavior is noticed. She explained that if a resident fights, staff should separate them and try to see if they would like to participate in an activity or if they would like a snack. Immediately after, this behavior should be reported to the nurse and updated on the [NAME] in PCC. The Corporate Nurse was informed the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was removed on 02/17/24 at 7:00 pm. The facility remained out of compliance at a scope of pattern and a severity level of no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that was not an Immediate Jeopardy, due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems that were put into place.
Feb 2024 4 deficiencies 1 IJ
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Safe Environment (Tag F0584)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public for 2 (Resident # 1 and Resident #2) of 5 residents reviewed for environment. -The facility failed to ensure staff had access to memory care Residents #1 and #2, for approximately 50 minutes, in the event of an incident or emergency when their bedroom door became wedged with their bathroom door preventing the bedroom door from opening. On 01/30/24 an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified. While the IJ was removed on 02/01/24, the facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of potential for more than minimal harm and a scope of isolated due to the facility continuing to monitor the implementation and effectiveness of their Plan of Removal. This failure placed residents at risk of not receiving appropriate care, interventions, and/or death. The findings included: Resident #1 Record review of Resident #1's admission Record, dated 01/30/24, revealed a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease (memory loss), insomnia (trouble falling and/or staying asleep), abnormalities of gait and mobility (problems with walking and standing), cognitive communication deficit (difficulty with communication), muscle weakness, and dysphagia (difficulty in swallowing food or liquid). Record review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 01/19/24, revealed a BIMS score of 0, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Record review of Resident #1's undated care plan revealed the following: resident had impaired thought processes, ADL self-care performance deficit. Resident required one-person assist as condition warranted with bed mobility, one-person extensive assistance with toilet use, and limited one-person assist as condition warranted due to fluctuation in condition related to disease process with transferring. Resident was at risk for falls and had a potential for uncontrolled pain. Resident #2 Record review of Resident #2's admission Record, dated 01/30/24, revealed a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's diagnoses included Parkinson's disease (brain disorder that causes involuntary movements), psychosis (conditions in the mind that results in difficulties determining what is real and what is not real), muscle weakness, lack of coordination, and cognitive communication deficit (difficulty with communication). Record review of Resident #2's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 12/14/23, revealed a BIMS score of 0, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Record review of Resident #2's undated care plan revealed the following: resident had impaired cognitive function, ADL self-care performance deficit and required one-person supervision for transfers and one-person supervision as needed for bed mobility and walking. She had impaired thought processes, a communication problem related to neurological symptoms related to Parkinson's and dementia and was at risk for falls related to decreased safety awareness, gait/balance problems, impaired mobility, and psychoactive drug use. Observation on 01/30/24 at 7:38 a.m., revealed Resident #1 and Resident #2's bedroom door, located in the memory care unit, did not open when the state surveyor attempted to enter their bedroom. The state surveyor notified Nurse A and asked her if she could open the door. Nurse A went to the bedroom door an attempted to open the door but was unsuccessful. Nurse A called out to CNA A who walked over to the door and said she thought the bathroom door was wedged behind the bedroom door which was preventing it from opening. CNA A and Nurse A took turns knocking on the bedroom door and calling out for Resident #2 asking her to open the door. CNA A said Resident #1 was Spanish speaking and did not understand what they were saying. Nurse B went to the residents' door and attempted to open the door and called out for Resident #2 by name. CNA A, Nurse A, and Nurse B were unable to get the residents bedroom door open. The Floor Tech was notified, and he tried to get the door open but was unable. The Floor Tech left and returned shortly with a metal tool that he slid through the door and used to close the bathroom door. Resident #1 and #2's bedroom door was opened at approximately 7:50 a.m. Observation on 01/30/24 at 7:51 a.m., revealed Resident #2 appeared to be asleep in her bed an unaware of what happened. Resident #1 was lying in bed, awake, and unaware of what happened. In an interview on 01/30/24 at 8:35 a.m., CNA A said she had been working at the facility for approximately 20 years. She said she was working the 6:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. shift today and clocked in at approximately 6:30 a.m. She said she checked on Residents #1 and #2 at approximately 7:00 a.m. but when she went to open their bedroom door, she noticed the bathroom door was wedged behind the bedroom door preventing it from opening. She said she let Nurse A know the door would not open at approximately 7:05 a.m. She said Nurse A and she took turns trying to open the door. She said they also knocked on their bedroom door and called out to Resident #2 many times to open the door. She said Nurse A was also not able to open the door. She said the Floor Tech went and tried to open the door but could not get it to open. She said the Floor Tech went and got equipment to open the door and was able to get the residents bedroom door opened. She said she thinks Resident #2 went to the bathroom, left the restroom door open too far, and then went back to bed. She said if there was any type of emergency, she would not think twice and would go outside to the patio, break the windows, and climb in to get to them and/or get them out of the building. She said she believed it would take approximately 5 minutes for her to do this. She said Resident's #1 and #2 walked without assistance and did not use any assistive devices. She said this was the first time this happened and had not happened before to any other residents. In an interview on 01/30/24 at 10:17 a.m., Nurse A said she had been working at the facility since October 2023. She said she was working the 6:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. shift today and arrived at the facility at approximately 6:20 a.m. She said she was at the nurse's station when CNA A told her that Resident #1 and #2's bedroom door would not open. She said she went to the bedroom door and tried to open it, but it would not open. She said she called Resident #2's name, and the resident said huh. She said she told Resident #2 to open the door many times, but she did not open the door. She said she told Nurse B that Resident #2's door would not open. She said she thought maybe something was caught on the door because when she pushed the door it would not open. She said she went to get the Maintenance Director but saw the Floor Tech when she was leaving the memory care unit. She said the Floor Tech called the Maintenance Director, and she told him that the bedroom door would not open when they tried to open it. She said the Maintenance Director told her to give the phone back to the Floor Tech so he could tell him what to do. She said when she gave the phone back to the floor Tech, he walked away and then came back with a tool and opened the door. She said if there was a medical emergency, she would call for another nurse, call 911, call the nursing director, run outside to the back where the residents' bedroom window was located, and break the window if needed, and try to attend to the patient to see what the emergency was . In an interview on 01/30/2024 at 11:12 a.m., the Maintenance Director said he had been working at the facility for approximately 3 years. He said he received a phone call this morning at approximately 7:52 a.m. from the Floor Tech. He said the Floor Tech told him that the restroom door and bedroom door to Resident #1 and 2's room were closed together and would not let the other one open. He said he told him he had to go to the closet and get a metal door opener to get the doors opened. He said this morning, when he received the phone call, was the first time he found out that the bathroom door was not working properly. He said all facility doors were checked monthly. He said in case of an emergency, they would call him, and he would instruct staff on what to do, and if needed he would go to the facility. He said the department heads and some of the facility staff submitted work orders through their online system. He said the other method was by writing a request in the maintenance log located at each nurse's station. He said the bathroom doors had a spring, not a pin, that need to be taken out and readjusted so the bathroom door would shut back on its own faster than the bedroom door opened . In an interview on 01/30/24 at 12:02 p.m., the Floor Tech said he had been working at the facility for approximately 2 years. He said the nurse (could not recall their name) told him Resident #1 and #2's bedroom door could not be opened. He said he called the Maintenance Director who told him to go get a metal tool from the closet located outside. He said he used the metal tool to get the door to open. He said today was the first time he was told that the bathroom door was not working properly . In an interview on 01/30/23 at 4:11 p.m., the Administrator said she had been working at the facility since 12/15/23. She said to her knowledge this type of incident had not happened in the past. She said the Maintenance Director showed her the bathroom door and told her the hinge had gotten off balance/dropped. She said the Maintenance Director showed her that he fixed the door and told her he checked the other doors to make sure it was not happening with any of the other bathroom doors. She said she asked the Maintenance Director if the doorknob could be switched to another shaped doorknob that the resident could still open. She said the Maintenance Director was going to talk to his supervisor about coming up with a solution. She said in case of a medical emergency, her expectation would be for staff to call 911, notify manager, notify maintenance, take the door knob off, and continue to make entry into the room until emergency personnel arrived on scene. She said the fire department was approximately 1 to 2 blocks away and would arrive to the facility quickly . In a follow-up interview on 02/01/24 at 1:38 p.m., CNA A said if staff were unable to access a resident in case of an emergency or incident it could potentially lead to the resident tripping, falling, hitting their head, or cause them to become scared because they were in an unfamiliar place . This was determined to be an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 01/30/24 at 5:25 p.m. The Administrator was notified and provided with the IJ template on 01/30/24 at 5:25 p.m. The following Plan of Removal submitted by the facility was accepted on 01/31/24 at 11:11 a.m. and included: PLAN OF REMOVAL Name of facility: [ ] Date: 1-30-24 IMMEDIATE ACTION: F921: Safe/Functional/Sanitary/Comfortable Environment The Maintenance Director was contacted by phone and made aware of the situation with the door handle hardware for Residents #1 and #2's room at approximately 7:40 am and instructed the floor tech assigned to the 300 hall to free the adjoining door handles from each other and he was successful. The residents inside the room were found to be safe and in no distress. The medical director was notified. Residents were assessed head to toe. Charge nurse completed the assessment on 1-30-24. Families of residents #1 and #2 were notified by charge nurse on 1-30-24. All resident room doors throughout the facility were inspected to ensure there were no issues. All doors were functioning properly. Inspection completed by maintenance director on 1-30-24. The maintenance Director and Regional Director of Physical Facilities were notified of the issue with the door handle hardware for Resident #1 and #2's room and instructed to change all door handles on the bathroom door to doorknobs to ensure that they do not latch on to each other under any circumstances. 23 door handles in total were replaced. Completion date 1-30-24. The maintenance director arrived at the facility to inspect the door and made adjustments to the door hinge to re-align the door so that the door handles do not get caught on each other. An inspection of all doors in the Memory care unit were then inspected to ensure there were no issues to any other doors. All doors were functioning properly. Completion date 1-31-24 Staff in-service initiated on 1-30-24 on what to do in the event of a resident room entry blocked and not able to enter the room in an emergency and non-emergency situation. Initial training conducted by Regional Nurse on 1-30-24 with management team. Staff will receive training in staff meeting by Administrator held on 1-31-24. Completion date will be 1-31-24. On 1-31-24 the management team will conduct a Standards of Care and QAPI ad hoc meeting with the Medical Director to discuss the findings and recommendations will be made and followed through if necessary. A monthly preventative maintenance inspection of resident living area doors and hardware will be implemented effective 1-31-24. This inspection will be conducted by the maintenance director or designee to ensure doors are functioning properly. Following the acceptance of the facility's Plan of Removal (POR), the facility was monitored from 01/31/24 through 02/01/24. Monitoring of the POR included: Observation on 01/31/24 at 2:14 p.m. revealed all door handles on the bathroom doors located inside the resident(s) room, in the memory care unit, were changed to doorknobs. A total of 23 door handles were changed. Observation on 01/31/24 at 5:10 p.m. revealed all bathroom doors located inside the resident(s) room opened and closed without becoming wedged with the bedroom door. During interviews on 01/31/24 and 02/01/24, the following Nurses and CNAs were able to verbalize an understanding of the steps to take if a resident's room was blocked from entry: Nurses A and B, CNAs A, B, C, D, E and, F . Record review of in-service training titled Steps to Take if Resident Room is Blocked from Entry held with department managers and staff, dated 01/30/24 and 01/31/24, revealed 128 signatures. Record review of Resident #1 and Resident #2's progress notes, dated 01/30/24, revealed they were assessed, and their families were contacted about the incident. Record review of the Foundations of Care Meeting Action Plan, dated 01/31/24, revealed the Medical Director and Nursing Staff were present and no further recommendations were made. The Administrator was notified the Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 02/01/24 at 4:01 p.m. The facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of no actual harm and a scope of isolated due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems that were put into place.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation and interview, the facility failed ensure a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation and interview, the facility failed ensure a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living receives the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #3 and #4) reviewed for activities of daily living. -The facility failed to provide incontinence care timely to Resident #3 and #4. These failures could place residents who were dependent on staff for ADL care at risk for infections, and a decreased quality of life. The findings included: Resident #3 Record review of Resident #3's admission Record, dated 01/31/24, revealed a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's diagnoses included dementia, urinary tract infection, and hydronephrosis (excess urine accumulation in kidney(s) that causes swelling of kidneys). Record review of Resident #3's Significant Change MDS assessment, dated 01/15/24, revealed a BIMS score of 2, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Record review of Resident #3's undated care plan revealed the following: -Resident had bladder incontinence. Interventions included incontinent care at least every 2 hours. -Resident had bowel incontinence. Interventions included checking resident every two hours and assisting with toileting as needed and providing peri-care after each incontinent episode. -Resident had an ADL self-care performance deficit. She required one-person extensive assistance with bed mobility and one-person total dependence with toileting and transferring. -Resident had a potential for uncontrolled pain. Observation and interview on 01/31/2024 at 11:45 a.m., revealed Resident #3 was lying in bed naked and had a pervasive odor of urine. The resident's left leg was contracted and had no pillow/separation/device in-between her thighs. The resident had a soiled brief with urine and feces. The resident's bed linen was stained with a large brown ring, and her blankets, gown, and pants were soiled with urine through to the mattress. CNA G said she last changed the resident at 8:40 a.m. and that she always changed her every two hours and as needed. In an interview on 01/31/2024 at 12:13 p.m., CNA G said not doing this could result in more infection and said she had in-services on incontinent care in December 2023 . Resident #4 Record review of Resident #4's admission Record, dated 01/30/24, revealed a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's diagnoses hydronephrosis (excess urine accumulation in kidney(s) that causes swelling of kidneys), overactive bladder, irritable bowel syndrome (common disorder that affects the stomach and intestines) with diarrhea, and muscle weakness. Record review of Resident #4's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 01/20/24, revealed a BIMS score of 8, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Record review of Resident #4's undated care plan revealed the following: -Resident had a communication problem related to intermittent confusion. -Resident was at risk for impaired skin integrity related to intermittent incontinence, decreased mobility, thin/fragile skin. Interventions included incontinence care after each episode and applying moisture barrier and notifying nurse immediately of any new areas of skin breakdown. -Resident has impaired cognitive function and impaired thought processes related to dementia. -Resident was at risk for infections related to intermittent urine incontinence. Interventions included checking her at least every 2 hours for incontinence, wash, rinse, and dry soiled area as needed. -Resident was at risk for ADL self-care performance deficit related to dementia. Interventions included extensive one-person assistance with bed mobility, personal hygiene, toileting, and weekly skin inspection. Observation and interview on 01/31/2024 at 9:10 a.m., revealed Resident #4 was sitting up in bed, awake, alert, and responding to questions. She said she was left sitting or lying in her soiled brief every day. She said she was last changed at 5:00 a.m., nobody had been in her room to change her, and it happened all the time since she came back to the facility. The resident's family members were at her bed side and both family members complained about the resident lying in her urine and feces all the time. Observation and interview on 01/31/2024 at 9:20 a.m., CNA H said she worked 6:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. for 7 years. She said she always checked her incontinent residents every 2 hours. She said she was in a meeting this morning and that was why she had not checked on her residents. In an interview on 01/31/24 at 5:15 p.m., the DON said the failure could cause skin breakdown, urinary tract infections, odors in the room, skin infections, and affect the resident's dignity.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Incontinence Care (Tag F0690)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed ensure a resident who is incontinent of bladder receives...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed ensure a resident who is incontinent of bladder receives appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and to restore continence to the extent possible for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #3 and #4) reviewed for urinary incontinence. -CNA G did not practice proper technique while providing incontinent care for Resident # 3. -CNA H did not practice proper technique while providing incontinent care for Resident # 4. This deficient practice could place residents at risk for infection and skin breakdown due to improper care practices. The findings included: Resident #3 Record review of Resident #3's admission Record, dated 01/31/24, revealed a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's diagnoses included dementia, urinary tract infection, and hydronephrosis (excess urine accumulation in kidney(s) that causes swelling of kidneys). Record review of Resident #3's Significant Change MDS assessment, dated 01/15/24, revealed a BIMS score of 2, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Record review of Resident #3's undated care plan revealed the following: -Resident had bladder incontinence. Interventions included incontinent care at least every 2 hours. -Resident had bowel incontinence. Interventions included checking resident every two hours and assisting with toileting as needed and providing peri-care after each incontinent episode. -Resident had an ADL self-care performance deficit. She required one-person extensive assistance with bed mobility and one-person total dependence with toileting and transferring. -Resident had a potential for uncontrolled pain. Observation and interview on 01/31/2024 at 11:45 a.m., revealed Resident #3 was lying in bed naked and had a pervasive odor of urine. The resident had a soiled brief with urine and feces. CNA G performed incontinence care. She took off the soiled brief, used wet wipes, cleaned the perineal area twice but did not open the labia to clean. She cleaned the bowel movement in between the buttocks several times, but did not clean around the buttocks. She put a clean brief on the resident and transferred her to her wheelchair and propelled her to the nurse's station. In an interview on 01/31/2024 at 12:13 p.m., CNA G said she did not do well with incontinence care and that she forgot to open and clean the labia, clean the buttocks, and wipe down the mattress. She said not doing this could result in more infection and said she had in-services on incontinent care in December 2023 . Resident #4 Record review of Resident #4's admission Record, dated 01/30/24, revealed a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's diagnoses hydronephrosis (excess urine accumulation in kidney(s) that causes swelling of kidneys), overactive bladder, irritable bowel syndrome (common disorder that affects the stomach and intestines) with diarrhea, and muscle weakness. Record review of Resident #4's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 01/20/24, revealed a BIMS score of 8, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Record review of Resident #4's undated care plan revealed the following: -Resident had a communication problem related to intermittent confusion. -Resident was at risk for impaired skin integrity related to intermittent incontinence, decreased mobility, thin/fragile skin. Interventions included incontinence care after each episode and applying moisture barrier and notifying nurse immediately of any new areas of skin breakdown. -Resident has impaired cognitive function and impaired thought processes related to dementia. -Resident was at risk for infections related to intermittent urine incontinence. Interventions included checking her at least every 2 hours for incontinence, wash, rinse, and dry soiled area as needed. -Resident was at risk for ADL self-care performance deficit related to dementia. Interventions included extensive one-person assistance with bed mobility, personal hygiene, toileting, and weekly skin inspection. Observation and interview on 01/31/2024 at 9:10 a.m., revealed Resident #4 was sitting up in bed, awake, alert, and responding to questions. She said she was left sitting or lying in her soiled brief every day. The resident's family members were at her bed side and voiced concerns about the resident having repeated urinary tract infections. Observation and interview on 01/31/2024 at 9:20 a.m., CNA H said she always checked her incontinent residents every 2 hours. She placed Resident #4 in a lying position, and removed her soiled brief with large bowel movement. She cleaned the perineal area twice with wet wipes but did not open the labia to clean. During the cleaning, the resident was saying ouch, ouch, and grimacing. The perineal area was very raw and red. CNA H positioned the resident to her right side and cleaned in-between the buttocks several times but did not clean around the buttocks. The resident's buttocks were very raw and red. The resident was moaning while CNA H was cleaning and said it was due to a sore on her buttock. At 9:42 a.m. CNA H put a clean brief on the resident, but the state surveyor stopped her as she was about to fasten the resident's brief and asked her to clean the resident's labia. A head to toes assessment was done (excoriation to perineal, groin, and buttocks) and there was no further skin break down noted. In an interview on 01/31/24 at 10:30 a.m., CNA H said she did not do a good job with incontinence care. She said she forgot to open and clean the labia and clean the buttocks. She said not cleaning the labia and buttocks could result in more infections. She said she had an in-service on incontinence care in December 2023 . In an interview on 01/31/24 at 5:15 p.m., the DON said she expected staff to do proper incontinence care, clean from front to back, open the labia, and clean the buttocks. She said the failure could cause skin breakdown, urinary tract infections, odors in the room, skin infections, and affect the resident's dignity. Record review of the facility's policy titled Perineal Care, revised October 2018, read in part .Steps in Procedure .For a female resident: .b. wash perineal area . (1) Separate labia and wash area .e. Wash the rectal area thoroughly, wiping from the base of the labia towards and extending over the buttocks.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #3 and #4) reviewed for infection control. -The facility failed to use proper infection control precautions when providing incontinence care to Resident #3 and #4. These failures could place residents at risk for cross contamination, infections, delay in treatment, and hospitalization. The findings included: Resident #3 Record review of Resident #3's admission Record, dated 01/31/24, revealed a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's diagnoses included dementia, urinary tract infection, and hydronephrosis (excess urine accumulation in kidney(s) that causes swelling of kidneys). Record review of Resident #3's Significant Change MDS assessment, dated 01/15/24, revealed a BIMS score of 2, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Record review of Resident #3's undated care plan revealed the following: -Resident had bladder incontinence. Interventions included incontinent care at least every 2 hours. -Resident had bowel incontinence. Interventions included checking resident every two hours and assisting with toileting as needed and providing peri-care after each incontinent episode. -Resident had an ADL self-care performance deficit. She required one-person extensive assistance with bed mobility and one-person total dependence with toileting and transferring. -Resident had a potential for uncontrolled pain. Observation and interview on 01/31/2024 at 11:45 a.m., revealed Resident #3 was lying in bed naked and had a pervasive odor of urine. The resident's left leg was contracted and had no pillow/separation/device in-between her thighs. The resident had a soiled brief with urine and feces. The resident's bed linen was stained with a large brown ring, and her blankets, gown, and pants were soiled with urine through to the mattress. CNA G performed incontinence care, she washed her hands, donned clean gloves, adjusted the bed, and took off the soiled brief. Using wet wipes, CNA G cleaned the perineal area twice but did not open the labia to clean. She changed gloves, went to the restroom, used hand sanitizer, donned clean gloves, positioned Resident #3 to her right side, cleaned the bowel movement in between the buttocks several times, but did not clean around the buttocks. CNA G changed her gloves and then donned a clean pair of gloves without washing her hands first. She put a clean brief on the resident and transferred her to her wheelchair and propelled her to the nurse's station. CNA G said she last changed the resident at 8:40 a.m. and that she always changed her every two hours and as needed. Observation on 01/31/2024 at 12:10 p.m., revealed CNA G did not clean Resident #3's mattress that was soiled with urine before putting on the clean bed linen. In an interview on 01/31/2024 at 12:13 p.m., CNA G said she did not do well with incontinence care and that she forgot to open and clean the labia, clean the buttocks, wipe down the mattress, and perform hand hygiene between glove change. She said not doing this could result in more infection and said she had in-services on incontinent care in December 2023 . Resident #4 Record review of Resident #4's admission Record, dated 01/30/24, revealed a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's diagnoses hydronephrosis (excess urine accumulation in kidney(s) that causes swelling of kidneys), overactive bladder, irritable bowel syndrome (common disorder that affects the stomach and intestines) with diarrhea, and muscle weakness. Record review of Resident #4's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 01/20/24, revealed a BIMS score of 8, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Record review of Resident #4's undated care plan revealed the following: -Resident had a communication problem related to intermittent confusion. -Resident was at risk for impaired skin integrity related to intermittent incontinence, decreased mobility, thin/fragile skin. Interventions included incontinence care after each episode and applying moisture barrier and notifying nurse immediately of any new areas of skin breakdown. -Resident has impaired cognitive function and impaired thought processes related to dementia. -Resident was at risk for infections related to intermittent urine incontinence. Interventions included checking her at least every 2 hours for incontinence, wash, rinse, and dry soiled area as needed. -Resident was at risk for ADL self-care performance deficit related to dementia. Interventions included extensive one-person assistance with bed mobility, personal hygiene, toileting, and weekly skin inspection. Observation and interview on 01/31/2024 at 9:10 a.m., revealed Resident #4 was sitting up in bed, awake, alert, and responding to questions. She said she was left sitting or lying in her soiled brief every day. She said she was last changed at 5:00 a.m., nobody had been in her room to change her, and it happened all the time since she came back to the facility. The resident's family members were at her bed side and both family members complained about the resident lying in her urine and feces all the time and had raw skin from front to back. The resident and family members voiced concerns about the resident having repeated urinary tract infections . Observation and interview on 01/31/2024 at 9:20 a.m., CNA H said she worked 6:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. for 7 years. She said she always checked her incontinent residents every 2 hours. She said she was in a meeting this morning and that was why she had not checked on her residents. She washed her hands, donned clean gloves, pulled privacy curtains, placed Resident #4 in a lying position, and removed her soiled brief with large bowel movement. She cleaned the perineal area twice with wet wipes but did not open the labia to clean. During the cleaning, the resident was saying ouch, ouch, and grimacing. The perineal area was very raw and red. CNA H doffed the soiled gloves, washed her hands, donned clean gloves, and positioned resident to her right side. She cleaned in-between the buttocks several times but did not clean around the buttocks. The resident's buttocks were very raw and red. The resident was moaning while CNA H was cleaning and said it was due to a sore on her buttock. At 9:42 a.m. CNA H put a clean brief on the resident, but the state surveyor stopped her as she was about to fasten the resident's brief and asked her to clean the resident's labia. A head to toes assessment was done (excoriation to perineal, groin, and buttocks) and there was no further skin break down noted. CNA applied barrier treatment cream. In an interview on 01/31/24 at 10:30 a.m., CNA H said she did not do a good job with incontinence care. She said she forgot to open and clean the labia and clean the buttocks. She said not cleaning the labia and buttocks could result in more infections. She said she had an in-service on incontinence care in December 2023 . In an interview on 01/31/24 at 5:15 p.m., the DON said she expected staff to do proper incontinence care, clean from front to back, open the labia, and clean the buttocks. She said she expected staff to wash and/or use hand sanitizer with glove change during incontinence care. She said the failure could cause skin breakdown, urinary tract infections, odors in the room, skin infections, and affect the resident's dignity. Record review of the facility's policy titled Perineal Care, revised October 2018, read in part .Steps in Procedure .For a female resident: .b. wash perineal area . (1) Separate labia and wash area .e. Wash the rectal area thoroughly, wiping from the base of the labia towards and extending over the buttocks. Record review of the facility's policy titled Handwashing/Hand Hygiene, revised August 2019, read in part .7. Use an alcohol-based hand rub containing at least 62% alcohol; or, alternatively, soap (antimicrobial or non-antimicrobial) and water for the following situations: .m. After removing gloves .
Dec 2023 9 deficiencies 5 IJ (3 facility-wide)
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Respiratory Care (Tag F0695)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care, inc...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care, including tracheostomy care and tracheal suctioning was provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, the resident's goals, and preferences for 1 of 2 Residents (Resident #49) reviewed for tracheostomy care, in that:. -the facility failed to immediately reposition the oxygen mask over Resident #49's tracheostomy when the resident was found in distress. -the facility failed to immediately suction Resident #49's tracheostomy when the resident was found in distress, with copious (abundant) amounts of secretions at the tracheal tube. -the facility failed to ensure the oxygen mask was in place to provide continuous oxygen flow to Resident #49 prior to leaving the resident's room. -the facility failed to maintain sterile procedure prior to tracheostomy suctioning for Resident #49. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was identified on 12/17/23. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 11:36 AM. While the IJ was removed on 12/22/23, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a severity level of no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that was not an Immediate Jeopardy, due to the facility still monitoring the effectiveness of their Plan of Removal. These deficient practices could place residents who were dependent on oxygen therapy at risk of respiratory distress, respiratory arrest, decline in health and hospitalization. Findings included: Record review of Resident #49's face sheet dated 12/12/2023 revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE], initially admitted on [DATE] and originally admitted on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included dementia, hypotension (low blood pressure), chronic respiratory failure, tracheostomy status (an airway surgically created through the neck into the windpipe to allow direct access to the breathing tube to provide an airway and to remove secretions from the lungs), impaired swallowing, gastrostomy status (a feeding tube inserted through the abdomen to allow administration of nutrition), seizures, metabolic encephalopathy( brain disturbance caused by conditions that disrupt blood chemistry affecting brain function), traumatic subdural hemorrhage (brain bleed), diabetes and anxiety disorder. Record review of Resident #49's hospital records revealed she was admitted to the hospital on [DATE] for hypoxia (deprivation of oxygen at the tissue level) and hypotension (low blood pressure). The resident had a fever and was having secretions coming out the tracheostomy site. Her diagnoses included septic shock r/t aspiration PNA, acute respiratory failure r/t aspiration PNA and bacterial sepsis (a potentially life threatening infection). The resident was admitted to the ICU and placed on contact and droplet isolation. The resident was discharged to the facility on [DATE] . Record review of Resident #49's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed the resident had minimal difficulty hearing, had no speech, was rarely/never understood, rarely/never understood others and had impaired vision. She required total dependence with one-to-two-person physical assist for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, eating, toilet use, personal hygiene and bathing. She had functional limitations in range of motion d/t impairment on both sides of upper and lower extremities. She had medically complex conditions. Section I of the MDS revealed active diagnoses in the last 7 days included respiratory failure and chronic respiratory failure. Section O of the MDS revealed she required oxygen therapy and tracheostomy care while not a resident and while a resident. Record review of Resident #49's order summary report dated 12/12/2023 revealed the following active physician orders: O2 (oxygen) via tracheostomy @ 28-40% (2-5 L/m) to keep oxygen saturation rate at 92% or greater every shift related to tracheostomy status. Suction tracheostomy PRN for patent airway every shift. Monitor for pain every shift. Tracheostomy care every shift, clean stoma with normal saline, pat dry, change dressing every shift. Turning and repositioning every 2 hours. Further review revealed a physician's order for Ipratropium-Albuterol Solution 3ml inhale orally every 6 hours for SOB/Wheezing, pre-Respiratory Treatment Assessment prior to administering medication. Post Nebulizer Assessment every 6 hours . Record review of Resident #49's undated care plan revealed the following, Focus: The resident had altered respiratory status r/t chronic respiratory failure with trach placement. Interventions included administer medications as ordered, monitor for s/sx of respiratory distress and report to the physician, monitor/document/report abnormal breathing patterns to MD: increased rate, decreased rate, periods of apnea (temporary cessation of breathing, especially during sleep), prolonged inhalation, prolonged exhalation, prolonged shallow breathing, prolonged deep breathing, use of accessory muscles, pursed-lip breathing, nasal flaring; and provide oxygen as ordered. Focus: The resident had a tracheostomy r/t chronic respiratory failure. Interventions included: change oxygen tubing per protocol, change trach tubing and cannula per order, ensure trach ties are secured at all times, humidified oxygen as prescribed and suction as necessary. Focus: The resident had oxygen therapy r/t ineffective gas exchange. Goal: The resident will have no s/sx of poor oxygen absorption through the review date. Interventions included: give medications as ordered, monitor for s/sx of respiratory distress and report to MD, prevent abdominal compression and impaired respiratory functioning by routinely checking the resident's position to prevent sliding down in bed. Further review revealed no interventions to address potential complications such as unplanned extubation, aspiration, respiratory infection, tracheal infection and mucus plugging. Further review revealed no mention of hospitalization on 09/05/2023. Resident #49 was admitted to the ICU for aspiration PNA and sepsis. In an interview on 12/15/2023 at 7:22AM, LVN R stated she was new and had been working at the facility for only three weeks. LVN R stated she was assigned to the residents in 200 Hall, including the two residents with tracheostomies. LVN R stated she had respiratory care training for tracheostomy residents during orientation and the topics included oxygen, suctioning, trach care, s/s of infection and secretions. LVN R stated the inservice was conducted by Respiratory Therapy and she could not recall the therapist's name. Observation and interview on 12/15/2023 at 7:40 AM revealed Resident #49 in bed and her upper body leaning to her right side with the top of her head against the wall. The head of the bed was raised. The trach mask connected to the oxygen tubing was not over Resident #49's tracheostomy to provide continuous flow of oxygen and the straps on the mask was very loose. Copious amounts of thick, white secretion were inside the tracheostomy tube covering almost the entire opening and dripped down onto the resident's chest. The resident showed visible signs of distress in that her eyes were opened very wide with a fixed, glassy stare, her eyebrows furrowed, her chest barely moving, and her upper body bent in an awkward position. The resident's arms were bent at the elbows and her hands were contracted into fists. LVN R put on clean gloves, straightened the resident's body upright. The oxygen mask was still not over the resident's tracheostomy. LVN R stated the first thing she would do was to check the resident's oxygen saturation rate and check her blood pressure. LVN R stated she would need to get the equipment from down the hall. LVN R positioned the oxygen mask over the resident's tracheostomy after the Surveyor intervened. LVN R left the room. Resident #49's eyes closed, and her facial muscles relaxed. The oxygen was set at 3L/m. Resident #49's respiration rate was shallow at approximately 20 breaths per minute. At 7:47 AM LVN R returned with the O2 sat monitor and automated BP cuff. Resident #49's oxygen saturation rate fluctuated and then settled at 97% - 98%. At 7:55 AM the resident's BP on her left upper arm was 100/60 and pulse was 71 bpm. The opening to the tracheostomy still had thick secretions. At 7:58AM, LVN R stated she was going to suction the resident. She gathered supplies from the room. LVN R washed her hands and placed the sterile tracheostomy care kit on the bedside table. LVN R opened the kit that contained sterile gloves, bottle of sterile NS (normal saline) and a sterile single use suction catheter. LVN R put on the sterile gloves and stated she forgot to turn on the suction machine. LVN R stopped and was looking around the room. LVN R stated she had sterile gloves on. The Surveyor intervened and asked if she touched the items outside the sterile field would the gloves be sterile or clean. LVN R stated they would be clean and no longer sterile then she removed the gloves. LVN R removed the plastic dust cover and turned on the suction machine. LVN R held the suction machine tubing and was attempting to place the tubing onto the bedside table. The suction tubing slipped and would not stay put on the table without LVN R holding onto it. After LVN R hesitated, the surveyor said if the tubing touched the floor would it be clean. LVN R stated it would become dirty. LVN R asked the Surveyor if it was ok to hang the tubing on the IV pole. LVN R hung the tubing on the IV pole. At 8:07AM LVN R washed her hands, put on pair of non-sterile gloves. LVN R opened the sterile suction catheter package and connected it to the suction machine tubing. LVN R opened the bottle of sterile NS and suctioned some of the sterile NS solution. LVN R moved the oxygen trach mask away from the opening of the tracheostomy. LVN R handled the tip of the sterile catheter then positioned it over the resident's tracheostomy, moving the tip closer to the inside of the tracheal tube. The Surveyor intervened prior to LVN R introducing the catheter tip into the resident's tracheal tube. LVN R stated the gloves were not sterile after the Surveyor intervened. LVN R stated she forgot and needed sterile gloves to prevent infection. LVN R disposed of the gloves and the catheter into the trash. LVN R searched the room and said there were no more sterile suction catheters in the room and that she needed to get another one. LVN R left the room. The oxygen trach mask was not positioned over the resident's tracheostomy. The resident was not receiving the continuous flow of oxygen. The Surveyor intervened, put on clean gloves and quickly placed the mask over the tracheostomy for the resident to start receiving the flow of oxygen. Resident #49's O2 sat was 98%. LVN R returned with supplies. LVN R stated she just forgot to put the trach mask back on the resident . At 8:15 AM the Surveyor exited the room to find a nurse to assist LVN R with suctioning. In an interview on 12/15/2023 at 8:15 AM, ADON B was walking down the hallway. The Surveyor explained that LVN R may need some assistance. ADON B stated the first thing LVN R should have done was suction Resident #49 to ensure the airway was patent and not blocked with secretions. ADON B stated she saw another nurse just then enter Resident #49's room. In an interview on 12/15/2023 at 12:40PM, LVN R stated her shift started at 6:00 AM. LVN R stated she came in late, made her rounds, checked on Resident #49 and found her to be OK. LVN R stated she was not too familiar with Resident #49 and did not know her respiratory status. LVN R stated some s/sx of respiratory distress would be facial expressions, eyes widening and labored breathing. LVN R stated when she first entered the room with the Surveyor, the resident was bent to one side, had increased secretions, and she looked tired. LVN R stated the positioning of the trach mask was off of the resident's tracheostomy and the straps to the trach mask should have been tighter. LVN R stated the straps and trach mask could have become loose during patient care. LVN R stated Resident #49 was supposed to have continuous oxygen and it was the nurse's responsibility to ensure the resident was receiving a continuous flow of oxygen. LVN R stated this was important so not to put the resident into respiratory distress. LVN R stated she should have positioned the oxygen mask back first before leaving the room. LVN R stated she forgot because she was nervous. LVN R stated she suctioned Resident #49 after the Surveyor left the room and that she did not have trouble with the procedure. In an interview on 12/15/2023 at 1:10 PM, the DON stated the first thing the nurse should have done was to get an oxygen saturation reading and suction the resident to prevent respiratory distress . In an interview on 12/16/2023 at 2:15 PM, RN D stated LVN R was a new nurse and panicked. RN D stated some s/sx of respiratory distress would be face changes, change in breathing pattern (which was distress), pain and something that would just not be right with the resident. RN D stated the risks to the resident would be respiratory distress, hypoxia, lethargy, infection d/t copious secretions. RN D stated she would not leave the resident, but instead would call for help and yell if she had to. RN D stated the first thing she would have done would be to increase the oxygen setting to ensure Resident #49 was getting enough oxygen. RN D stated she would not leave the resident without the oxygen mask on first. In a telephone interview on 12/16/2023 at 4:45 PM, RT B stated s/sx of respiratory distress would be changes in breathing pattern, bug eyed, crunched forehead and use of accessory muscles. RT B stated the number one s/sx of respiratory distress was restlessness. RT B stated nurses and RTs were responsible to ensure the resident was safe. RT B stated he would put the oxygen back on the resident, do an assessment, ensure the tubing was clean, with no kinks then move to the next assessment and suction clearing the airway. In a telephone interview on 12/18/2023 at 11:45 AM, the MD stated Resident #49 was dependent on oxygen and was totally dependent on staff for ADLs. The MD stated she expected that the oxygen would be on all the time. The MD stated Resident #49 was able to tolerate being off oxygen at times, but waxes and wanes. The MD stated the risks if the resident did not receive continuous oxygen would be respiratory distress, trouble breathing, increased respiratory rate, increased crackles, may have excessive secretions. The MD stated sometimes resident's heartbeat could exceed the normal resting rate and sometimes the blood pressure may change. The MD stated she would expect that nursing staff or RT would suction the resident if there were increased secretions. The MD stated sometimes she would order chest x-rays and/or labs. The MD stated she was not aware that Resident #49 had any issues on 12/15/2023 but there were other physicians that could have been notified. In an interview on 12/21/2023 at 12:19 PM, CNA EE stated she was assigned to Resident #49 and stated the nursing staff must do everything for her as she cannot do for herself. CNA EE stated the resident cannot move her legs, she can move one arm more than the other, when the Surveyor asked if the resident was able to move her limbs. CNA EE stated the signs of distress she saw were when she moved Resident #49's right leg for example and she heard the resident make a noise, sometimes she may cough and sometimes she would raise her eyebrows up and down. Record review of the facility's undated policy and procedure titled Skills Checklist - Tracheostomy suctioning, open suction system, read in part: .Objective: To suction a tracheostomy using an open suction system according to the standard of care .perform hand hygiene .Assess the patient's vital signs, breath sounds, respiratory effort and general appearance .remove the lid from the sterile solution and place it upside down on a clean surface .Using sterile technique, open the suction catheter kit and put on gloves. If using individual supplies, open the suction catheter and the gloves, then put on the gloves by first placing the nonsterile glove on your nondominant hand and then placing the sterile glove on your dominant hand. Using your nondominant (nonsterile) hand, pour a small amount of sterile solution into the sterile container. Close the solution bottle using your nondominant hand. Pick up the sterile suction catheter with your dominant (sterile) hand. Coil the catheter around your hand. Using your nondominant (nonsterile) hand, attach the catheter to the tubing. Turn the suction control valve to the on position and set the suction pressure to the lowest possible vacuum pressure needed to effectively clear secretions. Using your dominant (sterile) hand, lubricate the outside of the catheter by dipping in into the sterile solution. With the suction catheter tip in the sterile solution, occlude the suction control valve with the thumb of your nondominant hand; suction a small amount of the solution through the catheter. If the patient has a collar over the tracheostomy tube, move it Preoxygenate the patient with 100% oxygen for 30 to 60 seconds using a handheld resuscitation bag if necessary .Disconnect the handheld resuscitation bag if used. Insert the suction catheter into the tracheostomy tube; don't apply suction while inserting the catheter. Withdraw the catheter while applying intermittent suction and rotating the catheter between your fingertips. Reapply the tracheostomy collar .between suctioning passes . Record review of Lippincott Manual of Nursing Practice 11th Edition, Philadelphia, 2019 Wolters Kluwer, editor [NAME] M. [NAME], Chapter 10 Respiratory Function and Therapy, General Procedures and Treatment Modalities, read in part: .Types of Airways .6. Tracheostomy tube .a. Permits mechanical ventilation and facilitates secretion removal b. Can be for long-term use c. Bypasses upper airway defenses, increasing susceptibility to infection .Mobilization of Secretions - The goal of airway clearance techniques was to improve clearance of airway secretions, thereby decreasing obstruction of the airways. This serves to improve ventilation and gas exchange .Suctioning through an Endotracheal or Tracheostomy tube .4. Maintain sterile technique while suctioning . This was determined to be an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 12/17/2023 at 11:36 AM. The Administrator was notified. The Administrator was provided the IJ template on 12/17/2023 at 11:36 AM. The POR submitted by the Administrator was accepted on 12/21/2023 at 12:20 PM. The POR revealed: F695 - Respiratory Care The facility failed to ensure that the resident received the necessary treatment and services in accordance with professional practice. 12/15/2023 Resident #49 was assessed by the respiratory therapist and the ADON and notified family and physician. 12/17/2023 Resident #49 not in facility 12/20/2023 Resident returned to the facility. 12/17/2023 remaining resident with a trach was immediately assessed by the respiratory therapist in house. Status-stable and no respiratory distress 12-17-2023 12/17/2023 Identified Nurse re-educated on the policy and procedures for respiratory assessment, oxygen therapy, nebulizer therapy, tracheostomy suctioning and tracheostomy care. Respiratory Therapist provided the 1:1 training with return demonstration. 12/17/203 All Nurses received training respiratory assessment, signs and symptoms of respiratory distress and how to manage respiratory distress. The training also covered principals of oxygen therapy nebulizer Therapy, suctioning, tracheostomy care and emergency care. All nurses are responsible for providing tracheostomy care to residents. Training completion date will be 12/20/2023. New Hire nurses will receive training on respiratory assessment, signs and symptoms of respiratory distress and how to manage respiratory distress. All nurses are provided as well as trach training that was provided by the respiratory therapist. CNAs, and all ancillary departments were educated on sign and symptoms of respiratory distress when to notify the Charge Nurse if respiratory distress was observed. Training was provided by Rn/RCP H and RT B. The training was completed on 12/19/23. The charge nurse will ensure that the resident with trach was monitored with her clinical rounds and note any respiratory distress based on their individual needs of the resident and prn as indicated. The monitoring of trach patients are completed routinely in the shift and prn as indicated by resident clinical condition. The charge nurse will observe the resident to ensure trach collar was in place and resident was receiving adequate oxygen and trach was clear of excessive secretions. Resident with trach will be suctioned per physician orders and as needed based off of the clinical changes in the resident. All new hires will be required to complete training prior to job start. Staff education initiated per DON on 12/17/2023 on identifying signs and symptoms of respiratory distress and assessment. Training completion date 12/19/2023 All nursing staff will receive training prior to their next shift. The Medical Director was notified of the IJ on 12/17/2023. The facility QAPI team reviewed the Respiratory Treatment and Care Policies on 12/20/2023. Monitoring of the plan of removal included: Following acceptance of the facility's Plan of Removal, the facility was monitored from 12/21/23 to 12/22/2023. The surveyor confirmed the facility implemented their plan of removal sufficiently from 12/21/23 - 12/22/23 to remove the IJ by: Observations on 12/22/23 of the only two residents in the facility with tracheostomies who were receiving oxygen therapy. In an interview on 12/22/23 at 9:15 AM, ADON B stated after discussion with Surveyor on 12/15/23 at 8:15 AM, she did go into Resident #49's room and that the resident was stable. In a telephone interview on 12/22/23 at 5:00 PM, RN/RCP H stated she did assess Resident #49 after LVN R completed tracheal suctioning on 12/15/23 and stated the resident was stable. Interviews were conducted with staff, including LVN R, from all three shifts from 12/21/2023 - 12/22/23: DON, 3 RNs, 4 LVNs, 2 RTs, 7 CNAs, 1 ancillary staff. Nurses were able verbalize their understanding regarding resident assessments for the residents with tracheostomies; all aspects of respiratory care including, tracheostomy care, tracheal suctioning, oxygen therapy, nebulizer treatment, ensuring proper fit with the oxygen tracheostomy mask, respiratory assessments, emergency procedures, signs and symptoms of acute respiratory distress as well as abuse and neglect policies and procedures. CNAs and ancillary staff were able to verbalize their understanding of signs and symptoms of respiratory distress, when to notify the charge nurse. Record review of the December 2023 physician orders, MAR/TAR, progress notes, physician notes and hospital records for the two residents (#49 and #93) with tracheostomies requiring oxygen therapy. Record review of the facility's policies and procedures for change of condition, revised May 2017; resident assessments, revised March 2022; respiratory assessments, date reviewed April 15, 2016; oxygen administration, revised October 2, 2015; tracheostomy emergencies-dislodgement. Record review of staff, competency check lists and training reports conducted 12/15/23 through 12/22/23 for the following: respiratory assessments, signs/symptoms of respiratory distress and how to manage respiratory distress; tracheostomy care; tracheostomy suctioning; oxygen therapy; nebulizer treatments; infection control and conducted by Respiratory Therapists and DON. Record review of LVN R's re-education, competency check list completed on 12/18/23. QAPI meeting worksheet dated 12/20/23, included respiratory care/respiratory distress, abuse/neglect, infection control was attended and signed by: Administrator, DON, ADON, IP, Wound care nurse, Social Services, Activities, Housekeeping Director, Maintenance Director, Medical Records Director, and Medical Director. The Administrator was unavailable. The Chief Officer of Operations was informed the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was removed on 12/22/2023 at 5:10 PM. While the IJ was lowered on 12/22/23, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a severity level of no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that was not an Immediate Jeopardy, due to the facility still monitoring the effectiveness of their Plan of Removal.
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Deficiency F0726 (Tag F0726)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure that licensed nurses possess the specific comp...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure that licensed nurses possess the specific competencies and skill sets necessary to provide nursing services to meet the residents' needs safely, and in a manner that promotes each resident's rights, physical and mental well-being as identified through resident assessments, and described in the plan of care for one of 16 (LVN R) facility staff reviewed for competencies and skill sets for assessments, in that: LVN R failed to take prompt actions and identify potential issues early, without Surveyor intervention when Resident #49 was observed to be in distress for an unknown period of time. LVN R failed to ensure Resident #49 was receiving continuous oxygen prior to leaving the resident alone. LVN R failed to ensure sterile gloves were used prior to handling the sterile suction catheter for Resident #49. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was identified on 12/17/23. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 11:36 AM. While the IJ was removed on 12/22/23, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a severity level of no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that was not an Immediate Jeopardy, due to the facility still monitoring the effectiveness of their Plan of Removal. These failures in competencies could place residents at risk of their needs not being met safely, decline in health or hospitalization. Record review of Resident #49's face sheet dated 12/12/2023 revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE], initially admitted on [DATE] and originally admitted on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included dementia, hypotension (low blood pressure), chronic respiratory failure, tracheostomy status (an airway surgically created through the neck into the windpipe to allow direct access to the breathing tube providing an airway and to remove secretions from the lungs), impaired swallowing, gastrostomy status(a feeding tube inserted through the abdomen to allow administration of nutrition), seizures, metabolic encephalopathy ( brain disturbance caused by conditions that disrupt blood chemistry affecting brain function), traumatic subdural hemorrhage(brain bleed), diabetes and anxiety disorder. Record review of Resident #49's hospital records revealed she was admitted to the hospital on [DATE] for hypoxia (deprivation of oxygen at the tissue level) and hypotension (low blood pressure). The resident had a fever and was having secretions coming out the tracheostomy site. Her diagnoses included septic shock r/t aspiration PNA, acute respiratory failure r/t aspiration PNA and bacterial sepsis (a potentially life threatening infection). The resident was admitted to the ICU and placed on contact and droplet isolation. The resident was discharged to the facility on [DATE] . Record review of Resident #49's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed the resident had minimal difficulty hearing, had no speech, was rarely/never understood, rarely/never understood others and had impaired vision. She required total dependence with one-to-two-person physical assist for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, eating, toilet use, personal hygiene and bathing. She had functional limitations in range of motion d/t impairment on both sides of upper and lower extremities. She had medically complex conditions. Section I of the MDS revealed active diagnoses in the last 7 days included respiratory failure and chronic respiratory failure. Section O of the MDS revealed she required oxygen therapy and tracheostomy care while not a resident and while a resident. Record review of Resident #49's order summary report dated 12/12/2023 revealed the following active physician orders: O2 (oxygen) via tracheostomy @ 28-40% (2-5 L/m) to keep oxygen saturation rate at 92% or greater every shift related to tracheostomy status. Suction tracheostomy PRN for patent airway every shift. Monitor for pain every shift. Tracheostomy care every shift, clean stoma with normal saline, pat dry, change dressing every shift. Turning and repositioning every 2 hours. Ipratropium-Albuterol Solution 3ml inhale orally every 6 hours for SOB/Wheezing, pre-Respiratory Treatment Assessment prior to administering medication. Post Nebulizer Assessment every 6 hours. Record review of Resident #49's undated care plan revealed the following, Focus: The resident had altered respiratory status r/t chronic respiratory failure with trach placement. Interventions included administer medications as ordered, monitor for s/sx of respiratory distress and report to the physician, monitor/document/report abnormal breathing patterns to MD: increased rate, decreased rate, periods of apnea (temporary cessation of breathing, especially during sleep), prolonged inhalation, prolonged exhalation, prolonged shallow breathing, prolonged deep breathing, use of accessory muscles, pursed-lip breathing, nasal flaring; and provide oxygen as ordered. Focus: The resident had a tracheostomy r/t chronic respiratory failure. Interventions included: change oxygen tubing per protocol, change trach tubing and cannula per order, ensure trach ties are secured at all times, humidified oxygen as prescribed and suction as necessary. Focus: The resident had oxygen therapy r/t ineffective gas exchange. Goal: The resident will have no s/sx of poor oxygen absorption through the review date. Interventions included: give medications as ordered, monitor for s/sx of respiratory distress and report to MD, prevent abdominal compression and impaired respiratory functioning by routinely checking the resident's position to prevent sliding down in bed. Further review revealed no interventions to address potential complications such as unplanned extubation, aspiration, respiratory infection, and mucus plugging. Further review revealed no mention of hospitalization on 09/05/2023 when Resident #49 was admitted to the ICU for aspiration PNA and sepsis . In an interview on 12/15/2023 at 7:22AM, LVN R stated she was new and had been working at the facility for only three weeks. LVN R stated she was assigned to the residents in 200 Hall, including the two residents with tracheostomies. LVN R stated she had respiratory care training for tracheostomy residents during orientation and the topics included oxygen, suctioning, trach care, s/s of infection and secretions. LVN R stated the inservice was conducted by Respiratory Therapy and she could not recall the therapist's name. Observation and interview on 12/15/2023 at 7:40 AM revealed Resident #49 in bed and her upper body leaning to her right side with the top of her head against the wall. The head of the bed was raised. The trach mask connected to the oxygen tubing was not over Resident #49's tracheostomy to provide continuous flow of oxygen and the straps on the mask was very loose. Copious amounts of thick, white secretion were inside the tracheostomy tube covering almost the entire opening and dripped down onto the resident's chest. The resident showed visible signs of distress in that her eyes were opened very wide with a fixed stare, her eyebrows furrowed, her chest barely moving, and her upper body bent in awkward position. The resident's arms were bent at the elbows and hands were contracted into fists. LVN R put on clean gloves, straightened the resident's body upright. The oxygen mask was still not over the resident's tracheostomy. LVN R stated the first thing she would do was to check the resident's oxygen saturation rate and check her blood pressure. LVN R stated she would need to get the equipment from down the hall. LVN R positioned the oxygen mask over the resident's tracheostomy after the Surveyor intervened. LVN R left the room. Resident #49's eyes closed, and her facial muscles relaxed. The oxygen was set at 3L/m. Resident #49's respiration rate was shallow at approximately 20 breaths per minute. LVN R returned at 7:47 AM with the O2 sat monitor and automated BP cuff. Resident #49's oxygen saturation rate fluctuated and then settled at 97% - 98%. At 7:55 AM the resident's BP on her left upper arm was 100/60 and pulse was 71 bpm. The opening to the tracheostomy still had thick secretions. At 7:58AM, LVN R stated she was going to suction the resident. She gathered supplies from the room. LVN R washed her hands and placed the sterile tracheostomy care kit on the bedside table. LVN R opened the kit that contained sterile gloves, bottle of sterile NS (normal saline) and a sterile single use suction catheter. LVN R put on the sterile gloves and stated she forgot to turn on the suction machine. LVN R stopped and was looking around the room. LVN R did not move. LVN R stated she had sterile gloves on. The Surveyor intervened and asked if she touched the items outside the sterile field would the gloves be sterile or clean. LVN R stated they would be clean and no longer sterile then she removed the gloves. LVN R removed the plastic dust cover and turned on the suction machine. LVN R held the suction machine tubing and was attempting to place the tubing onto the bedside table. The suction tubing slipped and would not stay put on the table without LVN R holding onto it. After LVN R hesitated, the surveyor asked if the tubing touched the floor would it be clean. LVN R stated it would become dirty. LVN R asked the Surveyor if it was ok to hang the tubing on the IV pole. LVN R hung the tubing on the IV pole. At 8:07AM LVN R washed her hands, put on pair of non-sterile gloves. LVN R opened the sterile suction catheter package and connected it to the suction machine tubing. LVN R opened the bottle of sterile NS and suctioned some of the sterile NS solution. LVN R moved the oxygen trach mask away from the opening of the tracheostomy. LVN R handled the tip of the sterile catheter then positioned it over the resident's tracheostomy, moving the tip closer to the inside of the tracheal tube. The Surveyor intervened prior to LVN R introducing the catheter tip into the resident's tracheal tube. LVN R stated the gloves were not sterile after the Surveyor intervened. LVN R she stated she forgot and needed sterile gloves to prevent infection. LVN R disposed of the gloves and the catheter into the trash. LVN R searched the room and said there were no more sterile suction catheters in the room and that she needed to get another one. LVN R left the room. The oxygen trach mask was not positioned over the resident's tracheostomy. The resident was not receiving the continuous flow of oxygen. The Surveyor intervened, put on clean gloves and quickly placed the mask over the tracheostomy for the resident to start receiving the flow of oxygen again. Resident #49's O2 sat was 98%. LVN R returned with supplies. LVN R stated she just forgot to put the trach mask back on the resident. At 8:15 AM the Surveyor exited the room to find a nurse to assist LVN R with suctioning. In an interview on 12/15/2023 at 8:15 AM, ADON B was walking down the hallway. The Surveyor explained that LVN R may need some assistance. ADON B stated the first thing LVN R should have done was suction Resident #49 to ensure the airway was patent and not blocked with secretions. ADON B stated she just saw another nurse enter Resident #49's room. In an interview on 12/15/2023 at 12:40PM, LVN R stated her shift started at 6:00 AM. LVN R stated she came in late, made her rounds, checked on Resident #49 and found her to be OK. LVN R stated she was not too familiar with Resident #49 and did not know her respiratory status. LVN R stated some s/sx of respiratory distress would be facial expressions, eyes widening and labored breathing. LVN R stated when she first entered the room with the Surveyor, the resident was bent to one side, had increased secretions, and she looked tired. LVN R stated the positioning of the oxygen trach mask was off the resident's tracheostomy and the straps to the trach mask should have been tighter. LVN R stated the straps and trach mask could have become loose during patient care. LVN R stated Resident #49 was supposed to have continuous oxygen and it was the nurse's responsibility to ensure the resident was receiving a continuous flow of oxygen. LVN R stated this was important so not to put the resident into respiratory distress. LVN R stated she should have positioned the oxygen mask back first before leaving the room. LVN R stated she forgot because she was nervous. LVN R stated she suctioned Resident #49 after the Surveyor left the room and that she did not have trouble with the procedure. In an interview on 12/15/2023 at 1:10 PM, the DON stated the first thing the nurse should have done was to get an oxygen saturation reading and suction the resident to prevent respiratory distress. In an interview on 12/16/2023 at 2:15 PM, RN D stated LVN R was a new nurse and panicked. RN D stated some s/sx of respiratory distress would be face changes, change in breathing pattern (which was distress), pain and something that would just not be right with the reident. RN D stated the risks to the resident would be respiratory distress, hypoxia, lethargy (lack of energy), infection d/t copious secretions . RN D stated she would not leave the resident, but instead would call for help and yell if she had to. RN D stated the first thing she would have done would be to increase the oxygen setting to ensure Resident #49 was getting enough oxygen. RN D stated she would not leave the resident without the oxygen mask on first. In a telephone interview on 12/16/2023 at 4:45 PM, RT B stated s/sx of respiratory distress would be changes in breathing pattern, bug eyed, crunched forehead and use of accessory muscles. RT B stated the number one s/sx of respiratory distress was restlessness. RT B stated nurses and RTs were responsible to ensure the resident was safe. RT B stated he would have put the oxygen back on the resident, do an assessment, ensure the tubing was clean, with no kinks then move to the next assessment and suction clearing the airway. In a telephone interview on 12/18/2023 at 11:45 AM, the MD stated Resident #49 was dependent on oxygen and was totally dependent on staff for ADLs. The MD stated she expected that the oxygen would be on all the time. The MD stated Resident #49 was able to tolerate being off oxygen at times, but waxes and wanes. The MD stated the risks if the resident did not receive continuous oxygen would be respiratory distress, trouble breathing, increased respiratory rate, increased crackles, may have excessive secretions. The MD stated sometimes a resident's heartbeat could exceed the normal resting rate and sometimes the blood pressure may change. The MD stated she would expect that nursing staff or RT would suction the resident if there were increased secretions. The MD stated sometimes she may order chest x-rays and/or labs. Record review of LVN R's inservice records for Respiratory Competency Performance for Tracheal Suctioning and Oxygen Administration Competency Review, dated 12/01/2023 and reviewed by a Respiratory Care Practitioner, revealed LVN R was proficient. Record review of the facility's undated procedure titled Skills Checklist - Tracheostomy suctioning, open suction system, read in part: .Objective: To suction a tracheostomy using an open suction system according to the standard of care .perform hand hygiene .Assess the patient's vital signs, breath sounds, respiratory effort and general appearance .remove the lid from the sterile solution and place it upside down on a clean surface .Using sterile technique, open the suction catheter kit and put on gloves. If using individual supplies, open the suction catheter and the gloves, then put on the gloves by first placing the nonsterile glove on your nondominant hand and then placing the sterile glove on your dominant hand. Using your nondominant (nonsterile) hand, pour a small amount of sterile solution into the sterile container. Close the solution bottle using your nondominant hand. Pick up the sterile suction catheter with your dominant (sterile) hand. Coil the catheter around your hand. Using your nondominant (nonsterile) hand, attach the catheter to the tubing. Turn the suction control valve to the on position and set the suction pressure to the lowest possible vacuum pressure needed to effectively clear secretions. Using your dominant (sterile) hand, lubricate the outside of the catheter by dipping in into the sterile solution. With the suction catheter tip in the sterile solution, occlude the suction control valve with the thumb of your nondominant hand; suction a small amount of the solution through the catheter. If the patient has a collar over the tracheostomy tube, move it Preoxygenate the patient with 100% oxygen for 30 to 60 seconds using a handheld resuscitation bag if necessary .Disconnect the handheld resuscitation bag if used. Insert the suction catheter into the tracheostomy tube; don't apply suction while inserting the catheter. Withdraw the catheter while applying intermittent suction and rotating the catheter between your fingertips. Reapply the tracheostomy collar .between suctioning passes . Record review of the facility policy and procedure for Respiratory Assessment, reviewed : April 15, 2016, revealed in part: Introduction .The normal respiratory rate for an average adult was 12 to 20 breaths/minute; however, it's important to know the patient's normal baseline respiratory rate to detect changes in the patient's condition Implementation .Count respirations by observing the rise and fall of the patient's chest during breathing .Identifying Respiratory Patterns: type-Apnea, Characteristics-Periodic absence of breathing, Possible causes-Mechanical airway obstruction, Conditions that affect the brain's respiratory center . This was determined to be an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 12/17/2023 at 11:36 AM. The Administrator was notified. The Administrator was provided the IJ template on 12/17/2023 at 11:36 AM. The POR submitted by the Administrator was accepted on 12/21/2023 at 7:44 PM. The POR revealed: F726 - Nursing Services The facility failed to ensure residents received the necessary services to provide professional standard of care. Immediate Action: Nursing Services 12/17/2023 Resident #49 not in facility 12/20/21 Resident # 49 returned to the facility 12/15/2023 Resident #49 was assessed by the respiratory therapist and the ADON and notified family and physician. 12/17/2023 remaining resident with a trach was immediately assessed by the respiratory therapist in house. Status-stable and no respiratory distress 12-17-2023 12/17/2023 Nurse Identified re-educated on the policy and procedures for respiratory assessment, oxygen therapy, nebulizer therapy, tracheostomy suctioning and tracheostomy care. RRT provided the 1:1 training with return demonstration. 12/17/203 Licensed Staff were provided education on respiratory assessment, signs and symptoms of respiratory distress and how to manage respiratory distress by the RT. Training completion date will be 12/20/2023. All RNs, LVNs, received the training provided by RRT. All departments, housekeeping, dietary, maintenance, receptionist, nurses assistants, physical therapy were educated on signs and symptoms of respiratory distress and to notify the Charge Nurse immediately if respiratory distress was observed. All new hires will be required to complete training prior to job start. Staff education initiated per DON on 12/17/2023 on identifying signs and symptoms of respiratory distress and assessment. Training completion date 12/19/2023 All staff will receive training prior to their next shift. The Medical Director was notified of the IJ on 12/17/2023. Following acceptance of the facility's Plan of Removal, the facility was monitored from 12/21/23 to 12/22/2023. Monitoring of the plan of removal included: The surveyor confirmed the facility implemented their plan of removal sufficiently from 12/21/23 - 12/22/23 to remove the IJ by: Observations on 12/22/2023 at 10:25 AM of the only two residents in the facility with tracheostomies who required oxygen therapy (Resident #49 and Resident #93) revealed the residents were in no visible distress, oxygen trach masks were securely in place over the tracheostomy, no secretions noted, had clean dressings, oxygen settings were set at the physician's prescribed orders and emergency respiratory supplies were in place. The observation demonstrated the facility provided necessary nursing services to meet the resident's respiratory safety needs. In an interview on 12/22/23 at 9:15 AM, ADON B stated after discussion with Surveyor on 12/15/23 at 8:15 AM, she did go into Resident #49's room and that the resident was stable. In a telephone interview on 12/22/23 at 5:00 PM, RN/RCP H stated she did assess Resident #49 after LVN R completed tracheal suctioning on 12/15/23 and stated the resident was stable. The interviews demonstrated the facility followed up to ensure Resident #49 was stable after LVN R completed respiratory care on 12/15/2023. Interviews were conducted with staff, including LVN R, from all three shifts from 12/21/2023 - 12/22/23: DON, 3 RNs, 4 LVNs, 7 CNAs and 1 ancillary staff. Nurses were able to verbalize their understanding regarding resident assessments for the residents with tracheostomies; all aspects of respiratory care including, tracheostomy care, tracheal suctioning, oxygen therapy, nebulizer treatment, ensuring proper fit with the oxygen tracheostomy mask, respiratory assessments, emergency procedures, signs and symptoms of acute respiratory distress; how to manage distress as well as abuse and neglect policies and procedures. CNAs and ancillary staff were able to verbalize their understanding of signs and symptoms of respiratory distress, when to notify the charge nurse. Record review of the facility's policies and procedures for change of condition, revised May 2017; resident assessments, revised March 2022; respiratory assessments, date reviewed April 15, 2016; oxygen administration, revised October 2, 2015; tracheostomy emergencies-dislodgement. Record review of RNs and LVNs competency check lists and training reports conducted 12/15/23 through 12/22/23 for the following: respiratory assessments, signs/symptoms of respiratory distress and how to manage respiratory distress; tracheostomy care; tracheostomy suctioning; oxygen therapy; nebulizer treatments; infection control and conducted by Respiratory Therapists and DON. Record review of LVN R's re-education, competency check list completed on 12/18/23. The Administrator was unavailable. The Chief Officer of Operations was informed the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was removed on 12/22/2023 at 5:10 PM. While the IJ was lowered on 12/22/23, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a severity level of no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that was not an Immediate Jeopardy, due to the facility still monitoring the effectiveness of their Plan of Removal.
CRITICAL (L) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Someone could have died · This affected most or all residents

⚠️ Facility-wide issue

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident was free from neglect for 13 of ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident was free from neglect for 13 of 15 residents (Resident #1, Resident #16,Resident #20, Resident #25, Resident #37, Resident #39, Resident #49, Resident #51, Resident #61, Resident #84, Resident #100, Resident #107, Resident #109) across 3 out of 3 units (100-Hall, 200-Hall and 300 Hall) reviewed for neglect. - The facility failed to take the appropriate actions of: retaining an IP with qualified training, complete tracking and trending of infections from August to October of 2023, treat diagnosed and presumptive scabies ( an infestation with the scabies mite), isolate of resident's with presumptive and diagnosed scabies, implement of environment controls to limit the spread of scabies and infection control surveillance to prevent a scabies outbreak even though the facility administration was aware that residents and staff had contracted the same unspecified rash over multiple months. This failure to take action resulted in multiple residents across multiple units experiencing itching/scratching, being diagnosed and/or treated for scabies and placed on contact isolation. - Resident #107 (100 Hall) was treated unsuccessfully for scabies from 07/2023 to 12/2023, experienced rashes/itching/discomfort and developed crusted scabies (a rare highly contagious hyper-infestation of the scabies mites that usually occurs in immune compromised patients). - Resident #39, who roomed with Resident #107, reported he was very itchy, developed rashes on his entire body, and was diagnosed/treated for scabies. - Resident #25, who roomed with Resident #107, developed rashes on his entire body, and was diagnosed/treated for scabies. - Resident #37 (100 Hall) developed rashes on his trunk, arm, and thigh eventually suffering from a secondary bacterial skin infection (cellulitis) - Resident #100 (300 Hall) developed rashes covering his entire body including his penis, was diagnosed/treated for scabies and placed on contact isolation. - Resident #51 (100 Hall) developed rashes on her abdomen and chest area, experienced itching, was placed on contact isolation and treated for scabies. - Resident #61 (100 Hall) developed rashes on his stomach and complained of itching. - Resident #81 (100 Hall) developed rashes to her arms, trunk, chest and scratching at her skin. - Resident #16 (100 Hall) developed a rash to his stomach, was treated for scabies and placed on contact isolation. - Resident #84 (100 Hall) developed a rash on his stomach, was treated for scabies and placed on contact isolation - Resident #109(100 Hall) developed a rash to his abdomen/trunk, was treated for scabies and placed on contact isolation. - Resident #20 (200 Hall) developed a rash on his arms, was treated for scabies and placed on contact isolation. - Resident #1 (300 Hall) developed a rash and was treated for scabies and was placed on contact isolation. -the facility failed to take prompt actions and identify potential issues early, without Surveyor intervention when Resident #49, who had a tracheostomy (tube inserted into the windpipe to help a person breathe) was observed to be in distress for an unknown period of time. -the facility failed to ensure the oxygen mask was in place to provide continuous oxygen flow to Resident #49 prior to leaving the resident's room. -the facility failed to maintain sterile procedure prior to tracheostomy suctioning for Resident #49. An IJ was identified on 12/18/23. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 04:09 PM. While the IJ was removed on 12/23/23 at 03:20 PM, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of pattern and a severity level of actual harm that was not immediate due to the facility continuing to monitor the implementation and effectiveness of their plan of removal. These failures placed residents at risk for itching, discomfort, pain, secondary skin infections, acute respiratory distress and hospitalization. Findings included: Record review of the facility Infection Control Tracking and Trending for August, September and October of 2023 revealed, the tracking and trending was completed retrospectively for those months on 11/08/23 by the DON. Resident #107 Record review of Resident #107's Face Sheet dated 12/18/23 revealed, a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of depression, difficulty swallowing, down syndrome, fluid overload, hypertension. The resident had a diagnosis of Atopic dermatitis (swelling and irritation of the skin) and congenital ichthyosis (a group of rare skin conditions that cause dry, scaly skin that individuals are usually born with) as of 11/03/23, he did not have a diagnosis of Scabies. The resident discharged to the hospital on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #107's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed, severely impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making, substantial/maximal assistance for most ADLs, an indwelling catheter, frequently incontinent of bowel and application of ointments/medications other than to feet. Record review of Resident #107's undated care plan revealed, focus areas of - ID, DD with PASRR services, potential nutritional problems, potential for pressure ulcer development, impaired cognitive function, a communication problem and tube feeding. There was no focus area to address Resident #107's treatment/diagnosis of scabies. Record review of Resident #107's Order Summary dated 12/18/23 revealed, Resident #107 had orders for Permethrin (an insecticide used to treat scabies) on multiple occasions but was only on contact isolation once: - 06/23/23 Permethrin 5% for dermatitis for 2 days: apply to head to toe topically one time only for 2 days. Leave on for 8-145 hours. - 07/26/23 Permethrin 5% for pruritus: apply from head to toe excluding genitalia for 8-12 hours and rinse off next morning. - 08/18/23 Permethrin 5% : apply from head to toe excluding genitalia for 8-12 hours and rinse off next morning per dermatologist. - 11/03/23 Permethrin 5% for prophylactic dermatitis for 2 days: apply at bedtime and leave overnight. Rinse of in AM. - 12//11/23 Permethrin 5% apply topically one time for scabies infestation. Leave in for 8-14 hours, use strict contact precautions with protective garments. - 12/11/23 Contact Isolation- use strict contact precautions with protective garments. Record review of Resident #107's Dermatologist Note dated 07/26/23 revealed: Resident #107 was being seen as a referral from the Medical Director for a rash located on the body throughout. The rash was itchy and red and moderate in severity and it had been present for months. scaling and well demarcated, eczematous patches; differential diagnosis includes irritation dermatitis vs. scabies; plan- Plan: treat with triamcinolone 0.1% topical steroid cream, hydroxyzine 25 mg tablets as needed for itch and permethrin 5% apply topically once per week. Follow up in 6 weeks for skin check. Record review of Resident #107's Dermatologist Note dated 11/03/23 revealed: Impression: Eczema associated diagnosis: Scabies; status: worsening, Itch Numerical Rating scale:10; % body surface covered in rash: 70. Plan: treat with triamcinolone 0.1% topical steroid cream, hydroxyzine 25 mg tablets as needed for itch and permethrin 5% apply topically once per week. Record review of Resident #107's Physician Note dated 12/13/23 signed by the Medical Director revealed, Resident #107 was seen due to rash noted over the extremities and right upper shoulder that appeared crusted in nature. Diagnosis/Plan: unspecified dermatitis secondary to scabies infection, was started on permethrin cream, repeat treatment after 7 days, clean linens/clothes, deep clean room and contact isolation precautions in place. Record review of Resident #107's MARs from 06/2023 to 12/2023 revealed: - Jun 2023: Permethrin 5% apply to skin at bedtime for dermatitis for 2 days- it was only applied once on 6/24/23. - July 2023: Permethrin 5 % apply to skin for persistent dermatoses (a skin defect)- applied on 07/21/23. Permethrin 5% apply topically for pruritus- applied 7/26/23. - August 2023: Permethrin 5 %- applied 08/18/23 - November 2023: Permethrin 5 % prophylactically for dermatitis for 2 day- was only applied on 11/04/23 - December 2023: Permethrin 5% for scabies infestation use strict contact isolation- applied on 12/11/23 at 10:30 PM. Record review of Resident #107's Progress Notes from 12/22/22 to 12/23/23 revealed the resident's rash : - 06/24/23- generalized rash noted to entire body - 07/17/23- resident noted with recurrent rash to upper extremities - 07/23/23 day 7/7 of prednisone for generalized rash to torso. Area clean with red bumps noted from front/back torso. Resident scratching right front chest. - 08/24/23- generalized rash remains. - 09/12/23- Rash noted all over resident skin. - 11/02/23 at 01:30 AM: generalized rash remains pronounced, - 11/04/23 at 03:17 AM: generalized rash remains pronounced, dry, raised in some areas. - 11/04/23 at 10:15 AM : rash was still present to entire body and has new orders for permethrin 5% cream for 2 days and ammonium lactate 12% cream on shower day which will be on Monday 11/6/2023 - 12/14/23 at 02:30 AM- scaly, shedding, redness/self-inflicted scratches noted to skin. Resident on contact isolation There was only one mention of the resident having scabies on 12/12/23 at 04:01 AM- remain in contact isolation for scabies, permethrin cream applied to the entire body; and Resident #107 was first placed on contact isolation on 12/11/23. Record review of Resident #107's Hospital Progress dated 12/15/23 at 10:22 AM revealed, consult requested for cracking and flaking of skin with some deeper skin layer involvement. Dry thick crusted skin that extends from the right side of his head, neck, down the right shoulder, armpit, arm, right side of chest and left side of chest and armpit. Possible diagnosis of crusted scabies Record review of Resident #107's Hospital Wound Care Note dated 12/15/23 at 03:22 PM revealed, consult requested for cracking and flaking of skin with some deeper skin layer involvement. Dry thick crusted skin that extends from the right side of his head, neck, down the right shoulder, armpit, arm, right side of chest and left side of chest and armpit. Possible diagnosis of crusted scabies Record review of Hospital Infectious Disease Progress Note dated 12/17/23 at 07:46 AM revealed, Skin: chest, upper abdominal/upper extremity rash with skin lesions. Impression: Crusted Scabies Recommendations: Oral Ivermectin (an antiparasitic) and Topical Permethrin for crusted scabies. Record review of Hospital Infectious Disease Progress Note dated 12/18/23 at 05:32 AM revealed, Skin: chest, upper abdominal/upper extremity rash with skin lesions. Impression: Crusted Scabies Recommendations: Oral Ivermectin (an antiparasitic) for 4 days and Topical Permethrin for 3 days for crusted scabies. Record review of Resident #107's Medical Diagnoses printed 12/23/23 at 11:39 AM revealed, depression, difficulty swallowing, high blood pressure and atopic dermatitis. There was no documented diagnosis of scabies. An observation and interview on 12/13/2023 at 2:00 PM of the shared room of Resident #39, Resident #25 and Resident #107 with the Treatment Nurse revealed, the room door closed, with signage for contact isolation and a PPE cart at the door. Resident #107 was in the bed by the window, he was awake, receiving tube feeding, had a urinary foley catheter and was non interviewable. Resident #107 had fair colored skin with thick, dry, crusty, scaly large areas to the upper body. On both shoulders and upper arms were thick crusty, powdery white areas with red cracks. There were raised red bumps and rash to both forearms and to both upper thighs. The thighs had red scratch marks. The webbing between the thumb and pointer finger on both hands had powdery white irregular bumps. Resident #107 was scratching his groin and upper thighs. The treatment nurse stated he had dermatitis that worsened since he returned from the hospital in October 2023. The treatment nurse stated the rash on Resident #39 and Resident #107 appeared to be the same. She did not mention that Resident #107 had a presumptive diagnosis of scabies or that the resident was being treated for scabies. An observation and interview on 12/15/2023 at 4:00 PM revealed, Resident #107 in the ICU at the hospital with a diagnosis of respiratory failure and sepsis. Resident #107's room door was open and the resident was intubated(a tube into the throat to help breathing). The assigned hospital nurse stated when he was admitted on [DATE] d/t low blood pressures and elevated WBC. The hospital nurse stated they were not notified of the resident having scabies. The hospital nurse picked up her phone that was ringing and said it was the wound care nurse on the line who just told her she completed her evaluation done on 12/15/2023 and thought he might have scabies. The hospital nurses closed the resident's door and set up for contact isolation. Isolation signage was put up on the glass door. In an interview on 12/15/23 at 09:25 AM, MA A said she was present on 11/03/23 when Resident #107 saw the dermatologist. She said due to the rash being chronic and the severity of itching as well as the facility informing them other residents had similar rashes the Dermatologist wanted to treat Resident #107 for scabies. She said the MD ordered Permethrin 5% for Resident #107 to be repeated in 7 days. In an interview on 12/20/23 at 07:55 AM, the Hospital Treatment Nurse said when Resident #107 arrived to the hospital she observed thick plaques and rashes all over the parts of the body she could see (at least 1/3rd ) and she was surprised. She said the hyperkeratotic (a condition that causes skin to thicken in certain places) presentation and the residents history made her believe he had crusted scabies. Resident #39 Record review of Resident #39's Face Sheet dated 12/23/23 revealed, a 50-year-olf male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of: chronic pain syndrome, contractures, lack of coordination, anemia and a scabies (onset 12/11/23). Record review of Resident #39's Annual MDS dated [DATE] revealed, moderately impaired cognition as indicated by a BIMS score of 11 out of 15, dependence for most ADLs and application of ointments/medications other than to feet. Record review of Resident #39's undated Care Plan revealed, focus-impaired visual function, refusal of care (showers/shampoos and general grooming), total assistance with all ADLs except feeding. Focus- actual impaired to skin integrity r/t thick skin and callous buildup to feet, he refuses to shower routinely which precipitates dry skin formation; intervention- identify/document potential causative factors and eliminate/resolver where possible; keep skin clean and dry. Record review of Resident #39's NP Note dated 11/30/23 signed by the NP revealed, skin: chronic seborrheic dermatitis ( a chronic inflammatory disorder affecting areas of the head and trunk were glands are located)- refuses showers. Record review of Resident #39's NP Note dated 12/08/23 signed by the NP revealed, Diagnosis/Plan: seborrheic dermatitis- refuses showers. There was no documented description of the resident's rash. Record review of Resident #39's MD note dated 12/13/23 and signed by the Medical Director revealed, Resident #39 had a red rash over the extremities of both upper and lower extremities. The resident was on isolation and was started on permethrin for scabies but he continued to refuse showers and application of creams. Diagnosis/plan: unspecified dermatitis secondary to scabies infection, on contact isolation, on permethrin cream repeated after 7 days and room to be deep cleaned and linens washed. Record review of Resident #39's Clinical Census dated 12/23/23 revealed, Resident #39 shared a room with Resident #107 from 10/24/23 until Resident #107 was discharged to the hospital on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #39's Medical Diagnoses dated 12/23/23 at 12:57 PM, the diagnosis of scabies was added on 12/16/23 and the onset of the disease was 12/11/23. Record review of Resident #39's Progress notes from 12/22/22 to 12/23/23 revealed, Resident #39's had rashes dating back to 06/2023. - 6/13/23 at 04:46 PM- Resident's lower extremities are swollen with wound., Also has rash all over the body but was refusing treatment and medication. - 06/26/2023 at 10:40- The entire body skin observed with rash. There was no other mention of Resident #39 suffering from a rash until 12/14/23 (3 days after being diagnosed with scabies:) - 12/14/23- remain in contact isolation/precautions, generalized skin rash remains to the body. Record review of Resident #39's Order Summary dated 12/23/23 revealed, - 12/11/23 Permethrin 5% apply head to toe at bedtime for scabies infestation. Use strict contact precautions with protective garments. - 12/11/23 Permethrin 5% apply head to toe at bedtime for scabies infestation. Use strict contact precautions with protective garments. Start date 12/19/23. Record review of Resident #39's December 2023 MAR revealed, -Permethrin 5% topically at bedtime for scabies infestation- applied on 12/11/23 at 9:30 PM and 12/19/23 at 12:16 AM. Observation and interview on 12/13/2023 at 2:00 PM of the shared room of Resident #39, Resident #25 and Resident #107 with the Treatment Nurse revealed, the room door closed, with signage for contact isolation and a PPE cart at the door. Resident #39 was awake, dressed in a hospital gown and brief and was in the bed by the door. Resident #39's arms, legs and hands were contracted. Resident #39 stated it was ok to look at his skin and that areas on his skin were very itchy. Resident #39 had small, red bumps on the scalp, forehead, cheeks, on both elbows, arms and both lower legs had large red bumps. The treatment nurse stated the redness to the elbows and red areas on his back were not new. The treatment nurse stated the new red bumps appeared sometime last week (12/4/2023 to 12/08/2023). The treatment nurse stated these new red bumps occurred at the same time Resident #107's red bumps appeared. Observation and interview on 12/23/2023 at 12:00 PM, Resident#39 was in contact isolation. He had a plate of food on his chest. He had red bumps on his scalp, face and arms and was unchanged from 12/13/23. He said he did receive the treatment cream, then showers the next day. Resident #39 stated he was told the cream was for scabies. He stated that it started with Resident #107 and maybe from not having the bed linens changed and washed. He stated that the bed linens were changed out daily and his personal belongings were removed. He stated he did not feel as itchy. He stated he was able to sleep through the night but during mornings he would feel itchy when he thinks about it. He stated he will be getting out of isolation soon and was happy about that because he wanted to get his money so he can buy soda. Resident #25 Record review of Resident #25's Face Sheet dated 12/23/23 revealed, a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of ID, schizophrenia, anemia, anxiety, hallucinations, depression and scabies (onset date 12/11/23). Record review of Resident #25's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed, severely impaired cognition as indicated by a BIMS score of 00 out of 15, substantial to maximal assistance with most ADLs, and always incontinent of both bladder and bowel. There was no documentation of any applications of ointments/medication to the skin. Record review of Resident #25's undated Care Plan revealed, no related focus areas. There was no mention of any skin issues including rashes and scabies. Record review of Resident #25's Clinical Census revealed, Resident #25 shared a room with Resident #107 since 10/24/23. Record review of Resident #25's NP Note dated 11/27/23 revealed, no documented skin issues. Record review of Resident #25's NP Note dated 11/30/23 revealed- head to toe assessment done due to reports of patient had rash to both sides of his upper and lower extremities. He has elevated red bumps, dry scaly skin scattered to chest, abdominal area, back, both legs and arm but no rashes were observed on the web spaces of his hands, genitals or scalps. Monitor closes due to skin rash issues in the unit. Record review of Resident #25's NP Note dated 12/08/23 revealed, the resident was on hydrocortisone (steroid cream) for skin rash and the rash was unresolved. Record review of Resident #25's NP Note visit date 12/09/23 but signed on 12/18/23 revealed, Resident #25 was noted itching/scratching and had a persistent skin rash likely scabies. Resident #25 was treated with Sulfur 5% nightly for 3 days, with a plan to treat with Permethrin if the rash didn't resolve. Contact Isolation precautions and an oral medication to treat itching. Record review of Resident #25's Medical Diagnoses dated 12/23/23 at 12:57 PM, the diagnosis of scabies was added on 12/16/23 and the onset of the disease was 12/11/23. Record review of Resident #25's Order Summary dated 12/23/23 revealed: - 12/09/23- Sulfur 5% lotion for dermatitis, apply to entire body from neck down, rub in and leave on for 24 hours. - 12/11/23- Permethrin 5%- apply to head to toe topically one time only for scabies infestation. Leave on for 8-14 hours, use strict contact precautions with protective garments. - 12/11/23- Contact Isolation: use strict contact precautions with protective garments, every shift for scabies infestation. Record review of Resident #25's December 2023 MAR revealed, Resident #25 received Permethrin 5% on: - 12/12/23 at 08:43 AM - 12/20/23 at 12:52 AM Observation and interview on 12/13/2023 at 2:00 PM of the shared room of Resident #39, Resident #25 and Resident #107 with the Treatment Nurse revealed, the room door closed, with signage for contact isolation and a PPE cart at the door. Resident #25 was in the middle bed in a full body, long sleeve jump suit. When the Treatment Nurse removed his body suit, Resident #25 was observed with had light pink, small, raised bumps to both upper arms and on the abdomen. The Treatment Nurse stated Resident #25 was treated with Hydrocortisone cream beginning 11/30/2023 for a rash to both arms and legs. Resident #37 Record review of Resident #37's Face Sheet dated 12/23/23 revealed, a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of: epilepsy, asthma, arthritis, type 2 diabetes and scabies with an onset date of 12/16/23. Record review of Resident #37's MDS dated [DATE] revealed, severely impaired cognition as indicated by a BIMS score of 05 out of 15, rejection of care, substantial/maximal assistance with most ADLs and application of ointments/medications to skin other than feet. Record review of Resident #37's undated Care Plan revealed, no documented focus areas addressing, skin, rashes or scabies. Record review of Resident #37's Census revealed he shared a room with Resident #107 from 08/28/23 to 09/23/23. Record review of Resident #37's Progress Notes from 12/22/22 to 12/23/23 revealed: - 09/22/23 at 02:33 PM the resident had a new rash to both arms, chest and legs. There was no documentation of the resident being placed on contact isolation. - 09/22/23 at 02:49 PM: Change of condition identified in a change in skin condition, the resident has a personal history of infectious and parasitic diseases. Skin Status Evaluation: itching rash and an order was given for Permethrin 5% to chest both legs and both arms which should be washed of in 8-12 hrs, hydrocortisone 1% cream for 7 days and calamine lotion for 2 weeks. There was no documentation of the resident being placed on contact isolation. - 10/02/23 at 10:34 PM: PERMETHRIN CREAM 5% APPLIED ON RESIDENT ENTIRE BODY THIS SHIFT AND TO BE WASHED OFF IN 8-12HRS. - 10/16/23 Resident on day 5/7 of antibiotics for cellulitis. Rash remains. - 10/18/23 Resident still on antibiotics for cellulitis. Rash still present and some itching noted. - 10/20/23 Resident still noted with rash all over his body and treatments continue - 10/27/23 Resident continues with steroid cream to the body for generalized rash, red raised bumps noted. - 10/40/23 Generalized rash red in color and bumpy. - 11/03/23 Rash present to body, generalized mild redness with complaints of mild itching. - 11/06/23 Rash still visible. - 11/08/23 Resident with generalized rash to body, some itching noted-redirected to avoid infection/pain. - 11/21/23 Resident seen by NP, new orders to apply steroid cream to rash all over his body twice daily for 30 days. - 11/24/23 Rash remains reddened pronounced and generalized. - 11/28/23 Rash remains reddened pronounced and generalized - 12/06/23 Rash remains reddened. Apply steroid cream to torso, back, upper extremities and thighs. - 12/13/23 Resident was on antibiotics for skin cellulitis and generalized rash remains to the entire body. Redness and self-inflicted scratches to the back, legs, arms, neck and abdomen noted. - 12/14/23 Rash with little improvement. - 12/15/23 generalized rash remains to the entire body. Redness and self-inflicted scratches to the back, legs, arms, neck and abdomen noted and worse. - 12/18/23 Day 1 of Permethrin 5% treatment to body An observation and interview on 12/12/23 at 09:55 AM revealed, Resident #37 lying in bed well dressed and well-groomed with rashes/scabs to his arms. When asked about the rash./sores the resident said everything was ok and would not respond further. Record review of Resident #37's NP Note dated 11/28/23 revealed, evaluation of dermatitis. Patient has rash to upper torso. Record review of Resident #37's NP Note dated 12/09/23 revealed, dermatitis unresolved. Record review of Resident #37's NP Note dated 12/12/23 revealed, dermatitis unresolved. Likely scabies infection will treat with Permethrin, repeat dose if not resolved and contact isolation precautions. Record review of Resident #37's Order Summary sprinted 12/23/23 revealed: - 06/23/23 Permethrin 5% for dermatitis, apply for 2 days. - 09/22/23 Permethrin 5%- apply to arms, legs, chest typically one time only written for 2 days. - 10/02/23 Permethrin 5% for scabies - Contact precautions- use contact precautions with protective garments. There are no previous orders for contact precautions - 12/16/23 Permethrin 5% for scabies. Use contact precautions with protective garments - 12/21/23 Permethrin 5% for scabies. Use contact precautions with protective garments Record review of Resident #37's September 2023 MAR printed 12/23/23 revealed: - 09/22/23 Permethrin 5% applied at 04:45 PM. - 09/22/23 to 09/29/23 hydrocortisone 1% to arms, legs, and chest for pruritis at 09:00 AM and 05:00 PM Record review of Resident #37's October 2023 MAR printed 12/23/23 revealed: - 10/02/23 Permethrin 5% applied at 09:29 PM. - 10/26/23 to 10/31/23 Hydrocortisone 2.5 % to legs, armpits, trunk nightly for dermatitis Record review of Resident #37's November 2023 MAR printed 12/23/23 revealed: - 11/01/23 to 11/06/23 Hydrocortisone 2.5 % to legs, armpits, trunk nightly for dermatitis Resident #84 Record review of Resident #84's Face Sheet dated 12/19/23 revealed, a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of: Parkinson, dementia, depression, communication deficit and scabies with onset of 12/16/23. Record review of Resident #84's MDS dated [DATE] revealed, moderately impaired cognition as indicated by a BIMS score of 09 out of 15, extensive assistance with most ADLs and application of ointments/medications to the skin other than the feet. Record review of Resident #84's undated Care Plan revealed, no focus areas address rashes, itching or scabies. Record review of Resident #84's Census revealed, he shared a room with Resident #107 from 08/28/23 to 09/23/23 Record review of Resident #84's Progress Notes from 12/22/22 to 12/23/23 revealed, - 09/15/23 Resident noted with rash to entire body. - 10/03/23 Rash red and bumpy in appearance to legs and right thigh. - 10/20/23 Resident still noted with rash all over his body, treatment continues - 10/23/23 Resident given oral steroids for rash to lower legs, and areas of dry skin - 11/03/23 rash to both legs present bumpy and red. - 11/06/23 Dermatology appointment cancelled and will be rescheduled. - 11/16/23 Rash remains reddened, raised and generalized. - 11/30/23 Resident given oral antifungal for rash. - 12/14/23 Resident rash to both legs with little improvement. -12/15/23 Generalized rash/itching remain the same Record review of Resident #84's Order Summary report printed 12/23/23 revealed: - 12/16/23 Permethrin 5% for scabies. Use contact precautions with protective garments - 12/16/23 Contact precautions with protective garments every shift - 12/2/23 Permethrin 5% for scabies. Use contact precautions with protective garments An observation on 12/12/23 at 09:55 AM revealed, Resident # 84 lying in bed with a limited range of motion and wedge pillows propping him up. The resident was observed to have a rash on both his arms and had limited communication capability and all he could say his butt burned. In an interview on 12/12//23 at 10:00 AM, the treatment nurse said Resident #84 was previously treated for wounds on his buttocks but the medication was discontinued because the issue had resolved. She said she would visit the resident to reassess him, and notify the wound care doctor about the resident's complaints. The Treatment Nurse did not address the Resident #84's itching. Resident #20 Record review of Resident #20's Face Sheet dated 12/16/23 revealed, an [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses: dementia, mood disorder, Anxiety disorder and depression. Record review of Resident #20's 5-day MDS dated [DATE] revealed, severely intact cognition as indicated by a BIMS score of 00 out of 15, partial assistance with most ADLs and no application of ointments/medication to the skin. Record review of Resident #20's undated Care Plan revealed, focus- elopement risk/wanderer onset 04/17/23; intervention- intervene as appropriate, distract resident from wandering by offering pleasant diversion, food, conversations, television or books. The care plan does not address any skin issues. Record review of Resident #20's MD Note dated 12/13/23 revealed, resident was started on a steroid cream for itching for 7 days. Skin: new rash to the back of the hand with some redness around it. Record review of Resident #20's Order Summary dated 12/23/23 revealed: - 11/03/23 Prednisone ( a steroid) 20 mg- 1 tablet one time a day for rash for 3 days. - 11/03/23 Hydrocortisone 1 %- apply topically two times a day for rash/dry skin - 11/03/23 Diphenhydramine (Benadryl) 25 mg- give 1 tablet by mouth for rash. - 11/03/23 Prednisone 10 mg- 1 tablet by mouth 1 time a day for rash for 5 days starting 11/08/23. - 11/27/23 Prednisone 20 mg- give 2 tablets by mouth daily for pruritus. - 11/27/23 Diphenhydramine (Benadryl) 25 mg- give 1 tablet by mouth for rash. - 11/28/23 Hydrocortisone 1 % for pruritus- apply topically two times a day to torso, both upper and lower extremities. - 12/16/23 Permethrin 5% for scabies. Use contact precautions with protective garments - 12/16/23 Contact Precautions- use contact precautions with protective garments. - 12/21/23 Permethrin 5% for scabies. Use contact precautions with protective garments scheduled for 12/24/23 An observation and interview on 12/12/23 at 09:45 AM revealed, Resident #20 well dressed, well-groomed in a wheelchair in front of his room. The resident was wearing a long sleeve shirt but a rash could be seen at the end of the sleeve of his right arm
CRITICAL (L) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Someone could have died · This affected most or all residents

⚠️ Facility-wide issue

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and co...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections and follow accepted national standards for 13 out of 15 residents (Resident #1, Resident #16,Resident #20, Resident #25, Resident #37, Resident #39, Resident #51, Resident #61, Resident #81, Resident #84, Resident #95, Resident #100, Resident #107, Resident #109) and 4 of 5 Staff ( CNA AA, CNA BB, CNA CC, CNA D and CNA S) reviewed for infection control. - The facility failed to implement environment controls and surveillance to prevent a scabies outbreak. Resulting in 13 residents (Resident #1, Resident #16,Resident #20, Resident #25, Resident #37, Resident #39, Resident #51, Resident #61, Resident #81, Resident #84, Resident #100, Resident #107, Resident #109) and 4 Staff ( CNA AA, CNA BB, CNA CC and CNA S). - Administration was aware that residents and staff had contracted the same unspecified rash over multiple months (September through December) and did not implement infection control procedure. - The facility failed to retain an IP with qualified training, complete tracking and trending of infections from August to October of 2023. -CNA D failed to change gloves, perform hand hygiene after peri care and prior to touching clean items for Resident #95 (identified outside of the IJ). -CNA D failed to perform hand hygiene prior to leaving the resident's room after providing peri care to Resident #95 (identified outside of the IJ). An IJ was identified on 12/15/23. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 03:00 PM. While the IJ was removed on 12/19/23, at 02:39 PM. The facility remained out of compliance at a scope of pattern and a severity level of actual harm that was not immediate due to the facility continuing to monitor the implementation and effectiveness of their plan of removal. These failures placed residents at risk for contracting a severe contagious skin infection, resulting in severe itching, discomfort, pain, decreased quality of life, and hospitalization. Findings included: Record review of the facility Infection Control Tracking and Trending for August, September and October of 2023 revealed, the tracking and trending was completed retrospectively for those months on 11/08/23. Resident #107 Record review of Resident #107's Face Sheet dated 12/18/23 revealed, a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of depression, difficulty swallowing, down syndrome, fluid overload, hypertension. The resident had a diagnosis of Atopic dermatitis and congenital ichthyosis (a group of rare skin conditions that cause dry, scaly skin that individuals are usually born with) as of 11/03/23, he did not have a diagnosis of Scabies. Record review of Resident #107's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed, severely impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making, substantial/maximal assistance for most ADLs, an indwelling catheter, frequently incontinent of bowel and application of ointments/medications other than to feet. Record review of Resident #107's undated care plan revealed, focus areas of - ID, DD with PASRR services, potential nutritional problems, potential for pressure ulcer development, impaired cognitive function, a communication problem and tube feeding. There was no focus area to address Resident #107's treatment/diagnosis of scabies. Record review of Resident #107's Order Summary dated 12/18/23 revealed, Resident #107 had orders for Permethrin (an insecticide used to treat scabies) on multiple occasions but was only on contact isolation once: - 06/23/23 Permethrin 5% for dermatitis for 2 days: apply to head to toe topically one time only for 2 days. Leave on for 8-14 hours. - 07/26/23 Permethrin 5% for pruritus: apply from head to toe excluding genitalia for 8-12 hours and rinse off next morning. - 08/18/23 Permethrin 5%: apply from head to toe excluding genitalia for 8-12 hours and rinse off next morning per dermatologist. - 11/03/23 Permethrin 5% for prophylactic dermatitis for 2 days: apply at bedtime and leave overnight. Rinse of in AM. - 12//11/23 Permethrin 5% apply topically one time for scabies infestation. Leave in for 8-14 hours, use strict contact precautions with protective garments. - 12/11/23 Contact Isolation- use strict contact precautions with protective garments. Record review of Resident #107's Dermatologist Note dated 07/26/23 revealed: Resident #107 was being seen as a referral from the Medical Director for a rash located on the body throughout. The rash was itchy and red and moderate in severity and it had been present for months. scaling and well demarcated (defined boundaries), eczematous (skin conditions with redness and itching) patches; differential diagnosis includes irritation dermatitis vs. scabies; plan- Plan: treat with triamcinolone 0.1% topical steroid cream, hydroxyzine 25 mg tablets as needed for itch and permethrin 5% apply topically once per week. Follow up in 6 weeks for skin check. Record review of Resident #107's Dermatologist Note dated 11/03/23 revealed: Impression: Eczema associated diagnosis: Scabies; status: worsening, Itch Numerical Rating scale:10; % body surface covered in rash: 70. Plan: treat with triamcinolone 0.1% topical steroid cream, hydroxyzine 25 mg tablets as needed for itch and permethrin 5% apply topically once per week. Record review of Resident #107's Physician Note dated 12/13/23 signed by the Medical Director revealed, Resident #107 was seen due to rash noted over the extremities and right upper shoulder that appeared crusted in nature. Diagnosis/Plan: unspecified dermatitis secondary to scabies infection, was started on permethrin cream, repeat treatment after 7 days, clean linens/clothes, deep clean room and contact isolation precautions in place. Record review of Resident #107's MARs from 06/2023 to 12/2023 revealed: - Jun 2023: Permethrin 5% apply to skin at bedtime for dermatitis for 2 days- it was only applied once on 6/24/23. - July 2023: Permethrin 5 % apply to skin for persistent dermatoses- applied on 07/21/23. Permethrin 5% apply topically for pruritus- applied 7/26/23. - August 2023: Permethrin 5 %- applied 08/18/23 - November 2023: Permethrin 5 % prophylactically for dermatitis for 2 day- was only applied on 11/04/23 - December 2023: Permethrin 5% for scabies infestation use strict contact isolation- applied on 12/11/23 at 10:30 PM. Record review of Resident #107's Progress Notes from 06/24/23 to 12/23/23 revealed the resident's rash: - 06/24/23- generalized rash noted to entire body - 07/17/23- resident noted with recurrent rash to upper extremities - 07/23/23 day 7/7 of prednisone for generalized rash to torso. Area clean with red bumps noted from front/back torso. Resident scratching right front chest. - 08/24/23- generalized rash remains. - 09/12/23- Rash noted all over resident skin. - 11/02/23 at 01:30 AM: generalized rash remains pronounced, - 11/04/23 at 03:17 AM: generalized rash remains pronounced, dry, raised in some areas. - 11/04/23 at 10:15 AM : rash was still present to entire body and has new orders for permethrin 5% cream for 2 days and ammonium lactate 12% cream on shower day which will be on Monday 11/6/2023 - 12/14/23 at 02:30 AM- scaly, shedding, redness/self-inflicted scratches noted to skin. Resident on contact isolation There was only one mention of the resident having scabies on 12/12/23 at 04:01 AM- remain in contact isolation for scabies, permethrin cream applied to the entire body; and Resident #107 was first placed on contact isolation on 12/11/23. Record review of Resident #107's Hospital Wound Care Note dated 12/15/23 at 03:22 PM revealed, consult requested for cracking and flaking of skin with some deeper skin layer involvement. Dry thick crusted skin that extends from the right side of his head, neck, down the right shoulder, armpit, arm, right side of chest and left side of chest and armpit. Possible diagnosis of crusted scabies Record review of Hospital Infectious Disease Progress Note dated 12/17/23 at 07:46 AM revealed, Skin: chest, upper abdominal/upper extremity rash with skin lesions. Impression: Crusted Scabies Recommendations: Oral Ivermectin (an antiparasitic) and Topical Permethrin for crusted scabies. Record review of Hospital Infectious Disease Progress Note dated 12/18/23 at 05:32 AM revealed, Skin: chest, upper abdominal/upper extremity rash with skin lesions. Impression: Crusted Scabies Recommendations: Oral Ivermectin (an antiparasitic) for 4 days and Topical Permethrin for 3 days for crusted scabies. Record review of Resident #107's Medical Diagnoses printed 12/23/23 at 11:39 AM revealed, no diagnosis of scabies. An observation and interview on 12/13/2023 at 2:00 PM of the shared room of Resident #39, Resident #25 and Resident #107 with the Treatment Nurse revealed, the room door closed, with signage for contact isolation and a PPE cart at the door. Resident #107 was in the bed by the window, he was awake, receiving tube feeding, had a urinary foley catheter and was non interviewable. Resident #107 had fair colored skin with thick, dry, crusty, scaly large areas to the upper body. On both shoulders and upper arms were thick crusty, powdery white areas with red cracks. There were raised red bumps and rash to both forearms and to both upper thighs. The thighs had red scratch marks. The webbing between the thumb and pointer finger on both hands had powdery white irregular bumps. Resident #107 was scratching his groin and upper thighs. The treatment nurse stated he had dermatitis that worsened since he returned from the hospital in October 2023. The treatment nurse stated the rash on Resident #39 and Resident #107 appeared to be the same. She did not mention that Resident #107 had a presumptive diagnosis of scabies or that the resident was being treated for scabies. An observation and interview on 12/15/2023 at 4:00 PM revealed, Resident #107 in the ICU at the hospital with a diagnosis of respiratory failure and sepsis. Resident #107's room door was open and the resident was intubated The assigned hospital nurse stated when he was admitted on [DATE] d/t low blood pressures and elevated WBC. The hospital nurse stated they were not notified of the resident having scabies. The hospital nurse picked up her phone that was ringing and said it was the wound care nurse on the line who just told her she completed her evaluation done on 12/15/2023 and thought he might have scabies. The hospital nurses closed the resident's door and set up for contact isolation. Isolation signage was put up on the glass door. In an interview on 12/15/23 at 09:25 AM, MA A said she was present on 11/03/23 when Resident #107 saw the dermatologist. She said due to the rash being chronic and the severity of itching as well as the facility informing them other residents had similar rashes the Dermatologist wanted to treat Resident #107 for scabies. She said the MD ordered Permethrin 5% for Resident #107 to be repeated in 7 days. In an interview on 12/20/23 at 07:55 AM, the Hospital Treatment Nurse said when Resident #107 arrived to the hospital she observed thick plaques and rashes all over the parts of the body she could see (at least 1/3rd ) and she was surprised. She said the hyperkeratotic presentation and the residents history made her believe he had crusted scabies. Resident #39 Record review of Resident #39's Face Sheet dated 12/23/23 revealed, a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of: chronic pain syndrome, contractures, lack of coordination, anemia and a scabies (onset 12/11/23). Record review of Resident #39's Annual MDS dated [DATE] revealed, moderately impaired cognition as indicated by a BIMS score of 11 out of 15, dependence for most ADLs and application of ointments/medications other than to feet. Record review of Resident #39's undated Care Plan revealed, focus-impaired visual function, refusal of care (showers/shampoos and general grooming), total assistance with all ADLs except feeding. Focus- actual impaired to skin integrity r/t thick skin and callous buildup to feet, he refuses to shower routinely which precipitates dry skin formation; intervention- identify/document potential causative factors and eliminate/resolver where possible; keep skin clean and dry. Record review of Resident #39's NP Note dated 11/30/23 signed by the NP revealed, skin: chronic seborrheic dermatitis- refuses showers. Record review of Resident #39's NP Note dated 12/08/23 signed by the NP revealed, Diagnosis/Plan: seborrheic dermatitis- refuses showers. There was no documented description of the resident's rash. Record review of Resident #39's MD note dated 12/13/23 and signed by the Medical Director revealed, Resident #39 had a red rash over the extremities of both upper and lower extremities. The resident was on isolation and was started on permethrin for scabies but he continued to refuse showers and application of creams. Diagnosis/plan: unspecified dermatitis secondary to scabies infection, on contact isolation, on permethrin cream repeated after 7 days and room to be deep cleaned and linens washed. Record review of Resident #39's Clinical Census dated 12/23/23 revealed, Resident #39 shared a room with Resident #107 from 10/24/23 until Resident #107 was discharged to the hospital on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #39's Medical Diagnoses dated 12/23/23 at 12:57 PM, the diagnosis of scabies was added on 12/16/23 and the onset of the disease was 12/11/23. Record review of Resident #39's Progress notes from 12/22/22 to 12/23/23 revealed, Resident #39's had rashes dating back to 06/2023. - 6/13/23 at 04:46 PM- Resident's lower extremities are swollen with wound, Also has rash all over the body but was refusing treatment and medication. - 06/26/2023 at 10:40- The entire body skin observed with rash. There was no other mention of Resident #39 suffering from a rash until 12/14/23 (3 days after being diagnosed with scabies: - 12/14/23- remain in contact isolation/precautions, generalized skin rash remains to the body. Record review of Resident #39's Order Summary dated 12/23/23 revealed, - 12/11/23 Permethrin 5% apply head to toe at bedtime for scabies infestation. Use strict contact precautions with protective garments. - 12/11/23 Permethrin 5% apply head to toe at bedtime for scabies infestation. Use strict contact precautions with protective garments. Start date 12/19/23. Record review of Resident #39's December 2023 MAR revealed, -Permethrin 5% topically at bedtime for scabies infestation- applied on 12/11/23 at 9:30 PM and 12/19/23 at 12:16 AM. Observation and interview on 12/13/2023 at 2:00 PM, of the shared room of Resident #39, Resident #25 and Resident #107 with the Treatment Nurse revealed, the room door closed, with signage for contact isolation and a PPE cart at the door. Resident #39 was awake, dressed in a hospital gown and brief and was in the bed by the door. Resident #39's arms, legs and hands were contracted. Resident #39 stated it was ok to look at his skin and that areas on his skin were very itchy. Resident #39 had small, red bumps on the scalp, forehead, cheeks, on both elbows, arms and both lower legs had large red bumps. The treatment nurse stated the redness to the elbows and red areas on his back were not new. The treatment nurse stated the new red bumps appeared sometime last week (12/4/2023 to 12/08/2023). The treatment nurse stated these new red bumps occurred at the same time Resident #107's red bumps appeared. Observation and interview on 12/23/2023 at 12:00 PM, Resident#39 was in contact isolation. He had a plate of food on his chest. He had red bumps on his scalp, face and arms and was unchanged from 12/13/23. He said he did receive the treatment cream, then showers the next day. Resident #39 stated he was told the cream was for scabies. He stated that it started with Resident #107 and maybe from not having the bed linens changed and washed. He stated that the bed linens were changed out daily and his personal belongings were removed. He stated he did not feel as itchy. He stated he was able to sleep through the night but during mornings he would feel itchy when he thinks about it. He stated he will be getting out of isolation soon and was happy about that because he wanted to get his money so he can buy soda. Resident #25 Record review of Resident #25's Face Sheet dated 12/23/23 revealed, a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of ID, schizophrenia, anemia, anxiety, hallucinations, depression and scabies (onset date 12/11/23). Record review of Resident #25's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed, severely impaired cognition as indicated by a BIMS score of 00 out of 15, substantial to maximal assistance with most ADLs, and always incontinent of both bladder and bowel. There was no documentation of any applications of ointments/medication to the skin. Record review of Resident #25's undated Care Plan revealed, no related focus areas. There was no mention of any skin issues including rashes and scabies. Record review of Resident #25's Clinical Census revealed, Resident #25 shared a room with Resident #107 since 10/24/23. Record review of Resident #25's NP Note dated 11/27/23 revealed, no documented skin issues. Record review of Resident #25's NP Note dated 11/30/23 revealed- head to toe assessment done due to reports of patient had rash to both sides of his upper and lower extremities. He has elevated red bumps, dry scaly skin scattered to chest, abdominal area, back, both legs and arm but no rashes were observed on the web spaces of his hands, genitals or scalps. Monitor closes due to skin rash issues in the unit. Record review of Resident #25's NP Note dated 12/08/23 revealed, the resident was on hydrocortisone (steroid cream) for skin rash and the rash was unresolved. Record review of Resident #25's NP Note visit date 12/09/23 but signed on 12/18/23 revealed, Resident #25 was noted itching/scratching and had a persistent skin rash likely scabies. Resident #25 was treated with Sulfur 5% nightly for 3 days, with a plan to treat with Permethrin if the rash didn't resolve. Contact Isolation precautions and an oral medication to treat itching. Record review of Resident #25's Medical Diagnoses dated 12/23/23 at 12:57 PM, the diagnosis of scabies was added on 12/16/23 and the onset of the disease was 12/11/23. Record review of Resident #25's Order Summary dated 12/23/23 revealed: - 12/09/23- Sulfur 5% lotion for dermatitis, apply to entire body from neck down, rub in and leave on for 24 hours. - 12/11/23- Permethrin 5%- apply to head to toe topically one time only for scabies infestation. Leave on for 8-14 hours, use strict contact precautions with protective garments. - 12/11/23- Contact Isolation: use strict contact precautions with protective garments, every shift for scabies infestation. Record review of Resident #25's December 2023 MAR revealed, Resident #25 received Permethrin 5% on: - 12/12/23 at 08:43 AM, and - 12/20/23 at 12:52 AM. Observation and interview on 12/13/2023 at 2:00 PM of the shared room of Resident #39, Resident #25 and Resident #107 with the Treatment Nurse revealed, the room door closed, with signage for contact isolation and a PPE cart at the door. Resident #25 was in the middle bed in a full body, long sleeve jump suite. When the Treatment Nurse removed his body suite, Resident #25 was observed with had light pink, small, raised bumps to both upper arms and on the abdomen. The Treatment Nurse stated he was treated with Hydrocortisone cream beginning 11/30/2023 for a rash to both arms and legs. Resident #37 Record review of Resident #37's Face Sheet dated 12/23/23 revealed, a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of: epilepsy, asthma, arthritis, type 2 diabetes and scabies with an onset date of 12/16/23. Record review of Resident #37's MDS dated [DATE] revealed, severely impaired cognition as indicated by a BIMS score of 05 out of 15, rejection of care, substantial/maximal assistance with most ADLs and application of ointments/medications to skin other than feet. Record review of Resident #37's undated Care Plan revealed, no documented focus areas addressing, skin, rashes or scabies. Record review of Resident #37's Census revealed he shared a room with Resident #107 from 08/28/23 to 09/23/23. Record review of Resident #37's Progress Notes from 12/22/22 to 12/23/23 revealed: - 09/22/23 at 02:33 PM the resident had a new rash to both arms, chest and legs. There was no documentation of the resident being placed on contact isolation. - 09/22/23 at 02:49 PM: Change of condition identified in a change in skin condition, the resident has a personal history of infectious and parasitic diseases. Skin Status Evaluation: itching rash and an order was given for Permethrin 5% to chest both legs and both arms which should be washed of in 8-12 hrs, hydrocortisone 1% cream for 7 days and calamine lotion for 2 weeks. There was no documentation of the resident being placed on contact isolation. - 10/02/23 at 10:34 PM: Permethrin cream 5% applied on resident entire body this shift and to be washed off in 8-12hrs. - 10/16/23 Resident on day 5/7 of antibiotics for cellulitis. Rash remains. - 10/18/23 Resident still on antibiotics for cellulitis. Rash still present and some itching noted. - 10/20/23 Resident still noted with rash all over his body and treatments continue - 10/27/23 Resident continues with steroid cream to the body for generalized rash, red raised bumps noted. - 10/40/23 Generalized rash red in color and bumpy. - 11/03/23 Rash present to body, generalized mild redness with complaints of mild itching. - 11/06/23 Rash still visible. - 11/08/23 Resident with generalized rash to body, some itching noted-redirected to avoid infection/pain. - 11/21/23 Resident seen by NP, new orders to apply steroid cream to rash all over his body twice daily for 30 days. - 11/24/23 Rash remains reddened pronounced and generalized. - 11/28/23 Rash remains reddened pronounced and generalized - 12/06/23 Rash remains reddened. Apply steroid cream to torso, back, upper extremities and thighs. - 12/13/23 Resident was on antibiotics for skin cellulitis and generalized rash remains to the entire body. Redness and self-inflicted scratches to the back, legs, arms, neck and abdomen noted. - 12/14/23 Rash with little improvement. - 12/15/23 generalized rash remains to the entire body. Redness and self-inflicted scratches to the back, legs, arms, neck and abdomen noted and worse. - 12/18/23 Day 1 of Permethrin 5% treatment to body An observation and interview on 12/12/23 at 09:55 AM revealed, Resident #37 lying in bed well dressed and well-groomed with rashes/scabs to his arms. When asked about the rash/sores the resident said everything was ok and would not respond further. Record review of Resident #37's NP Note dated 11/28/23 revealed, evaluation of dermatitis. Patient has rash to upper torso. Record review of Resident #37's NP Note dated 12/09/23 revealed, dermatitis unresolved. Record review of Resident #37's NP Note dated 12/12/23 revealed, dermatitis unresolved. Likely scabies infection will treat with Permethrin, repeat dose if not resolved and contact isolation precautions. Record review of Resident #37's Order Summary sprinted 12/23/23 revealed: - 06/23/23 Permethrin 5% for dermatitis, apply for 2 days. - 09/22/23 Permethrin 5%- apply to arms, legs, chest typically one time only written for 2 days. - 10/02/23 Permethrin 5% for scabies. - Contact precautions- use contact precautions with protective garments. There are no previous orders for contact precautions. - 12/16/23 Permethrin 5% for scabies. Use contact precautions with protective garments. - 12/21/23 Permethrin 5% for scabies. Use contact precautions with protective garments. Record review of Resident #37's September 2023 MAR printed 12/23/23 revealed: - 09/22/23 Permethrin 5% applied at 04:45 PM. - 09/22/23 to 09/29/23 hydrocortisone 1% to arms, legs, and chest for pruritis at 09:00 AM and 05:00 PM. Record review of Resident #37's October 2023 MAR printed 12/23/23 revealed: - 10/02/23 Permethrin 5% applied at 09:29 PM. - 10/26/23 to 10/31/23 Hydrocortisone 2.5 % to legs, armpits, trunk nightly for dermatitis Record review of Resident #37's November 2023 MAR printed 12/23/23 revealed: - 11/01/23 to 11/06/23 Hydrocortisone 2.5 % to legs, armpits, trunk nightly for dermatitis Resident #84 Record review of Resident #84's Face Sheet dated 12/19/23 revealed, a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of: Parkinson, dementia, depression, communication deficit and scabies with onset of 12/16/23. Record review of Resident #84's MDS dated [DATE] revealed, moderately impaired cognition as indicated by a BIMS score of 09 out of 15, extensive assistance with most ADLs and application of ointments/medications to the skin other than the feet. Record review of Resident #84's undated Care Plan revealed, no focus areas address rashes, itching or scabies. Record review of Resident #84's Census revealed, he shared a room with Resident #107 from 08/28/23 to 09/23/23 Record review of Resident #84's Progress Notes from 12/22/22 to 12/23/23 revealed, - 09/15/23 Resident noted with rash to entire body. - 10/03/23 Rash red and bumpy in appearance to legs and right thigh. - 10/20/23 Resident still noted with rash all over his body, treatment continues - 10/23/23 Resident given oral steroids for rash to lower legs, and areas of dry skin - 11/03/23 rash to both legs present bumpy and red. - 11/06/23 Dermatology appointment cancelled and will be rescheduled. - 11/16/23 Rash remains reddened, raised and generalized. - 11/30/23 Resident given oral antifungal for rash. - 12/14/23 Resident rash to both legs with little improvement. -12/15/23 Generalized rash/itching remain the same Record review of Resident #84's Order Summary report printed 12/23/23 revealed - 12/16/23 Permethrin 5% for scabies. Use contact precautions with protective garments - 12/16/23 Contact precautions with protective garments every shift - 12/2/23 Permethrin 5% for scabies. Use contact precautions with protective garments An observation on 12/12/23 at 09:55 AM revealed, Resident # 84 lying in bed with a limited range of motion and wedge pillows propping him up. The resident was observed to have a rash on both his arms and had limited communication capability and all he could say his butt burned. In an interview on 12/12//23 at 10:00 AM, the treatment nurse said Resident #84 was previously treated for wounds on his buttocks but the medication was discontinued because the issue had resolved. She said she would visit the resident to reassess him, and notify the wound care doctor about the resident's complaints. The Treatment Nurse did not address the Resident #84's itching. Resident #20 Record review of Resident #20's Face Sheet dated 12/16/23 revealed, an [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses: dementia, mood disorder. Anxiety disorder and depression. Record review of Resident #20's 5 day MDS dated [DATE] revealed, severely intact cognition as indicated by a BIMS score of 00 out of 15, partial assistance with most ADLs and no application of ointments/medication to the skin. Record review of Resident #20's undated Care Plan revealed, focus- elopement risk/wanderer onset 04/17/23; intervention- intervene as appropriate, distract resident from wandering by offering pleasant diversion, food, conversations, television or books. The care plan does not address any skin issues. Record review of Resident #20's MD Note dated 12/13/23 revealed, resident was started on a steroid cream for itching for 7 days. Skin: new rash to the back of the hand with some redness around it. Record review of Resident #20's Order Summary dated 12/23/23 revealed: - 11/03/23 Prednisone ( a steroid) 20 mg- 1 tablet one time a day for rash for 3 days. - 11/03/23 Hydrocortisone 1 %- apply topically two times a day for rash/dry skin - 11/03/23 Diphenhydramine (Benadryl) 25 mg- give 1 tablet by mouth for rash. - 11/03/23 Prednisone 10 mg- 1 tablet by mouth 1 time a day for rash for 5 days starting 11/08/23. - 11/27/23 Prednisone 20 mg- give 2 tablets by mouth daily for pruritus. - 11/27/23 Diphenhydramine (Benadryl) 25 mg- give 1 tablet by mouth for rash. - 11/28/23 Hydrocortisone 1 % for pruritus- apply topically two times a day to torso, both upper and lower extremities. - 12/16/23 Permethrin 5% for scabies. Use contact precautions with protective garments - 12/16/23 Contact Precautions- use contact precautions with protective garments. - 12/21/23 Permethrin 5% for scabies. Use contact precautions with protective garments scheduled for 12/24/23 An observation and interview on 12/12/23 at 09:45 AM revealed, Resident #20 well dressed, well-groomed in a wheelchair in front of his room. The resident was wearing a long sleeve shirt but a rash could be seen at the end of the sleeve of his right arm and a skin tear on the back of his right arm. When asked questions the resident would only respond that he wanted coffee. An observation on 12/15/23 at 03:00 PM revealed, Resident #20 observed in the dining area with a rash on his right hand and arm, a skin tear to the right hand that appeared to be scabbed. An observation on 12/15/23 at 03:23 PM revealed, Resident #20 ambulating in his wheelchair to the front lobby. The resident attempted to open the office door and was instructed by the DON that he could not be in the hallway because he was on isolation. The resident left the office and headed toward the resident rooms, the DON did not escort the resident back to his room or get assistance from other staff. Resident #20 returned 5 minutes later with a mask on his face. In an observation and interview on 12/16/23 at 12:50 PM, Resident #20's room was observed to be empty and the Isolation signage as well as the bin were no longer at the resident's door. The DON said Resident #20 was removed from isolation because the facility was unable to keep him in his room and the resident roamed the building. An observation on 12/16/23 at 03:55 PM revealed, Resident #20 ambulating in the front lobby trying to get access to the office by pulling the door. Resident #100 Record review of Resident #100's Face Sheet dated 12/23/23 revealed, an [AGE] year-old man who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of: dementia, malnutrition, depression, anxiety and scabies with an onset date of 12/18/23. Record review of Resident #100's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 11/4/2023 revealed a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 0 out of 15 indicating Resident # was severely cognitively impaired. Section GG revealed the resident needed substantial/maximal assistance with toileting, showering/bathing, upper and lower body dressing, and personal hygiene. Section M1200 revealed Applications of ointments/medications other than to feet. Record review of Resident #100's Care Plan dated 4/28/2023 revealed in part . The resident has infection of the skin .the resident will be free from complications related to infection through the review date. Record review of Resident #100's Progress Notes from 12/22/22 to 12/23/23 revealed, - 05/09/23 Permethrin Cream treatment for rash all over body - 09/06/23 Resident receiving topical steroid for body itching, less scratching observed. - 10/16/23 Resident observed multiple times scratching arms and che[TRUNCATED]
CRITICAL (L) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Deficiency F0882 (Tag F0882)

Someone could have died · This affected most or all residents

⚠️ Facility-wide issue

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a person designated as the infection preventionist had compl...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a person designated as the infection preventionist had completed specialized training in infection prevention and control for 1 of 1 staff (DON) reviewed for Infection Preventionist qualifications and role. - The facility failed to ensure the DON had completed the required Nursing Facility Infection Preventionist training course IP which resulted in failure to implement an effective Infection Control Program, resulting in Residents #107, #39, #25, #37, #100, #51, #61, #81, #16, #84, #109, #20, and #1 contracting and being treated for scabies. - The facility failed to ensure the Infection Preventionist completed tracking and trending of infections for August through October of 2023. - The facility failed to ensure that there was a qualified Infection Preventionist from November 4th to December 15th 2023. An IJ was identified on 12/15/23. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 03:00 PM. While the IJ was removed on 12/19/23, at 02:39 PM. The facility remained out of compliance at a scope of pattern and a severity level of actual harm that was not immediate due to the facility continuing to monitor the implementation and effectiveness of their plan of removal. These failures placed residents at risk for itching, discomfort, pain, secondary skin infections and hospitalization. Findings included: Record review of the facility Infection Control Tracking and Trending for August, September and October of 2023 revealed, the tracking and trending was completed retrospectively for those months on 11/08/23 by the DON. Resident #107 Record review of Resident #107's Face Sheet dated 12/18/23 revealed, a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of depression, difficulty swallowing, down syndrome, fluid overload, hypertension. The resident had a diagnosis of Atopic dermatitis and congenital ichthyosis (a group of rare skin conditions that cause dry, scaly skin that individuals are usually born with) as of 11/03/23, he did not have a diagnosis of Scabies. Record review of Resident #107's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed, severely impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making, substantial/maximal assistance for most ADLs, an indwelling catheter, frequently incontinent of bowel and application of ointments/medications other than to feet. Record review of Resident #107's undated care plan revealed, focus areas of - ID, DD with PASRR services, potential nutritional problems, potential for pressure ulcer development, impaired cognitive function, a communication problem and tube feeding. There was no focus area to address Resident #107's treatment/diagnosis of scabies. Record review of Resident #107's Order Summary dated 12/18/23 revealed, Resident #107 had orders for Permethrin (an insecticide used to treat scabies) on multiple occasions but was only on contact isolation once: - 06/23/23 Permethrin 5% for dermatitis for 2 days: apply to head to toe topically one time only for 2 days. Leave on for 8015 hours. - 07/26/23 Permethrin 5% for pruritus: apply from head to toe excluding genitalia for 8-12 hours and rinse off next morning. - 08/18/23 Permethrin 5% : apply from head to toe excluding genitalia for 8-12 hours and rinse off next morning per dermatologist. - 11/03/23 Permethrin 5% for prophylactic dermatitis for 2 days: apply at bedtime and leave overnight. Rinse of in AM. - 12//11/23 Permethrin 5%c0 apply topically one time for scabies infestation. Leave in for 8-14 hours, use strict contact precautions with protective garments. - 12/11/23 Contact Isolation- use strict contact precautions with protective garments. Record review of Resident #107's Dermatologist Note dated 07/26/23 revealed: Resident #107 was being seen as a referral from the Medical Director for a rash located on the body throughout. The ratch was itchy and red and moderate in severity and it had been present for months. scaling and well demarcated, eczematous patches; differential diagnosis includes irritation dermatitis vs. scabies; plan- Plan: treat with triamcinolone 0.1% topical steroid cream, hydroxyzine 25 mg tablets as needed for itch and permethrin 5% apply topically once per week. Follow up in 6 weeks for skin check. Record review of Resident #107's Dermatologist Note dated 11/03/23 revealed: Impression: Eczema associated diagnosis: Scabies; status: worsening, Itch Numerical Rating scale:10; % body surface covered in rash: 70. Plan: treat with triamcinolone 0.1% topical steroid cream, hydroxyzine 25 mg tablets as needed for itch and permethrin 5% apply topically once per week. Record review of Resident #107's Physician Note dated 12/13/23 signed by the Medical Director revealed, Resident #107 was seen due to rash noted over the extremities and right should that appeared crusted in nature. Diagnosis/Plan: unspecified dermatitis secondary to scabies infection, was started on permethrin cream, repeat treatment after 7 days, clean linens/clothes, deep clean room and contact isolation precautions in place. Record review of Resident #107's MARs from 06/2023 to 12/2023 revealed: - Jun 2023: Permethrin 5% apply to skin at bedtime for dermatitis for 2 days- it was only applied once on 6/24/23. - July 2023: Permethrin 5 % apply to skin for persistent dermatoses- applied on 07/21/23. Permethrin 5% apply topically for pruritus- applied 7/26/23. - August 2023: Permethrin 5 %- applied 08/18/23 - November 2023: Permethrin 5 % prophylactically for dermatitis for 2 day- was only applied on 11/04/23 - December 2023: Permethrin 5% for scabies infestation use strict contact isolation- applied on 12/11/23 at 10:30 PM. Record review of Resident #107's Progress Notes from 12/22/22 to 12/23/23 revealed the resident's rash : - 06/24/23- generalized rash noted to entire body - 07/17/23- resident noted with recurrent rash to upper extremities - 07/23/23 day 7/7 of prednisone for generalized rash to torso. Area clean with red bumps noted from front/back torso. Resident scratching right front chest. - 08/24/23- generalized rash remains. - 09/12/23- Rash noted all over resident skin. - 11/02/23 at 01:30 AM: generalized rash remains pronounced, - 11/04/23 at 03:17 AM: generalized rash remains pronounced, dry, raised in some areas. - 11/04/23 at 10:15 AM : rash was still present to entire body and has new orders for permethrin 5% cream for 2 days and ammonium lactate 12% cream on shower day which will be on Monday 11/6/2023 - 12/14/23 at 02:30 AM- scaly, shedding, redness/self-inflicted scratches noted to skin. Resident on contact isolation There was only one mention of the resident having scabies on 12/12/23 at 04:01 AM- remain in contact isolation for scabies, permethrin cream applied to the entire body; and Resident #107 was first placed on contact isolation on 12/11/23. Record review of Resident #107's Hospital Wound Care Note dated 12/15/23 at 03:22 PM revealed, consult requested for cracking and flaking of skin with some deeper skin layer involvement. Dry thick crusted skin that extends from the right side of his head, neck, down the right shoulder, armpit, arm, right side of chest and left side of chest and armpit. Possible diagnosis of crusted scabies Record review of Hospital Infectious Disease Progress Note dated 12/17/23 at 07:46 AM revealed, Skin: chest, upper abdominal/upper extremity rash with skin lesions. Impression: Crusted Scabies Recommendations: Oral Ivermectin (an antiparasitic) and Topical Permethrin for crusted scabies. Record review of Hospital Infectious Disease Progress Note dated 12/18/23 at 05:32 AM revealed, Skin: chest, upper abdominal/upper extremity rash with skin lesions. Impression: Crusted Scabies Recommendations: Oral Ivermectin (an antiparasitic) for 4 days and Topical Permethrin for 3 days for crusted scabies. Record review of Resident #107's Medical Diagnoses printed 12/23/23 at 11:39 AM revealed, no diagnosis of scabies. An Observation and interview on 12/13/2023 at 2:00 PM of the shared room of Resident #39, Resident #25 and Resident #107 with the Treatment Nurse revealed, the room door closed, with signage for contact isolation and a PPE cart at the door. Resident #107 was in the bed by the window, he was awake, receiving tube feeding, had a urinary foley catheter and was non interviewable. Resident #107 had fair colored skin with thick, dry, crusty, scaly large areas to the upper body. On both shoulders and upper arms were thick crusty, powdery white areas with red cracks. There were raised red bumps and rash to both forearms and to both upper thighs. The thighs had red scratch marks. The webbing between the thumb and pointer finger on both hands had powdery white irregular bumps. Resident #107 was scratching his groin and upper thighs. The treatment nurse stated he had dermatitis that worsened since he returned from the hospital in October 2023. The treatment nurse stated the rash on Resident #39 and Resident #107 appeared to be the same. She did not mention that Resident #107 had a presumptive diagnosis of scabies or that the resident was being treated for scabies. An Observation and interview on 12/15/2023 at 4:00 PM revealed, Resident #107 in the ICU at the hospital with a diagnosis of respiratory failure and sepsis. Resident #107's room door was open and the resident was intubated The assigned hospital nurse stated when he was admitted on [DATE] d/t low blood pressures and elevated WBC. The hospital nurse stated they were not notified of the resident having scabies. The hospital nurse picked up her phone that was ringing and said it was the wound care nurse on the line who just told her she completed her evaluation done on 12/15/2023 and thought he might have scabies. The hospital nurses closed the resident's door and set up for contact isolation. Isolation signage was put up on the glass door. In an interview on 12/15/23 at 09:25 AM, MA A said she was present on 11/03/23 when Resident #107 saw the dermatologist. She said due to the rash being chronic and the severity of itching as well as the facility informing them other residents had similar rashes the Dermatologist wanted to treat Resident #107 for scabies. She said the MD ordered Permethrin 5% for Resident #107 to be repeated in 7 days. In an interview on 12/20/23 at 07:55 AM, the Hospital Treatment Nurse said when resident #107 arrived to the hospital she observed thick plaques and rashes all over the parts of the body she could see (at least 1/3rd ) and she was surprised. She said the hyperkeratotic presentation and the residents history made her believe he had crusted scabies. Resident #39 Record review of Resident #39's Face Sheet dated 12/23/23 revealed, a 50-year-olf male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of: chronic pain syndrome, contractures, lack of coordination, anemia and a scabies (onset 12/11/23). Record review of Resident #39's Annual MDS dated [DATE] revealed, moderately impaired cognition as indicated by a BIMS score of 11 out of 15, dependence for most ADLs and application of ointments/medications other than to feet. Record review of Resident #39's undated Care Plan revealed, focus-impaired visual function, refusal of care (showers/shampoos and general grooming), total assistance with all ADLs except feeding. Focus- actual impaired to skin integrity r/t thick skin and callous buildup to feet, he refuses to shower routinely which precipitates dry skin formation; intervention- identify/document potential causative factors and eliminate/resolver where possible; keep skin clean and dry. Record review of Resident #39's NP Note dated 11/30/23 signed by the NP revealed, skin: chronic seborrheic dermatitis- refuses showers. Record review of Resident #39's NP Note dated 12/08/23 signed by the NP revealed, Diagnosis/Plan: seborrheic dermatitis- refuses showers. There was no documented description of the resident's rash. Record review of Resident #39's MD note dated 12/13/23 and signed by the Medical Director revealed, Resident #39 had a red rash over the extremities of both upper and lower extremities. The resident was on isolation and was started on permethrin for scabies but he continued to refuse showers and application of creams. Diagnosis/plan: unspecified dermatitis secondary to scabies infection, on contact isolation, on permethrin cream repeated after 7 days and room to be deep cleaned and linens washed. Record review of Resident #39's Clinical Census dated 12/23/23 revealed, Resident #39 shared a room with Resident #107 from 10/24/23 until Resident #107 was discharged to the hospital on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #39's Medical Diagnoses dated 12/23/23 at 12:57 PM, the diagnosis of scabies was added on 12/16/23 and the onset of the disease was 12/11/23. Record review of Resident #39's Progress notes from 12/22/22 to 12/23/23 revealed, Resident #39's had rashes dating back to 06/2023. - 6/13/23 at 04:46 PM- Resident's lower extremities are swollen with wound, Also has rash all over the body but was refusing treatment and medication. - 06/26/2023 at 10:40- The entire body skin observed with rash. There was no other mention of Resident #39 suffering from a rash until 12/14/23 (3 days after being diagnosed with scabies: - 12/14/23- remain in contact isolation/precautions, generalized skin rash remains to the body. Record review of Resident #39's Order Summary dated 12/23/23 revealed, - 12/11/23 Permethrin 5% apply head to toe at bedtime for scabies infestation. Use strict contact precautions with protective garments. - 12/11/23 Permethrin 5% apply head to toe at bedtime for scabies infestation. Use strict contact precautions with protective garments. Start date 12/19/23. Record review of Resident #39's December 2023 MAR revealed, -Permethrin 5% topically at bedtime for scabies infestation- applied on 12/11/23 at 9:30 PM and 12/19/23 at 12:16 AM. Observation and interview on 12/13/2023 at 2:00 PM of the shared room of Resident #39, Resident #25 and Resident #107 with the Treatment Nurse revealed, the room door closed, with signage for contact isolation and a PPE cart at the door. Resident #39 was awake, dressed in a hospital gown and brief and was in the bed by the door. Resident #39's arms, legs and hands were contracted. Resident #39 stated it was ok to look at his skin and that areas on his skin were very itchy. Resident #39 had small, red bumps on the scalp, forehead, cheeks, on both elbows, arms and both lower legs had large red bumps. The treatment nurse stated the redness to the elbows and red areas on his back were not new. The treatment nurse stated the new red bumps appeared sometime last week (12/4/2023 to 12/08/2023). The treatment nurse stated these new red bumps occurred at the same time Resident #107's red bumps appeared. Observation and interview on 12/23/2023 at 12:00 PM, Resident#39 was in contact isolation. He had a plate of food on his chest. He had red bumps on his scalp, face and arms and was unchanged from 12/13/23. He said he did receive the treatment cream, then showers the next day. Resident #39 stated he was told the cream was for scabies. He stated that it started with Resident #107 and maybe from not having the bed linens changed and washed. He stated that the bed linens were changed out daily and his personal belongings were removed. He stated he did not feel as itchy. He stated he was able to sleep through the night but during mornings he would feel itchy when he thinks about it. He stated he will be getting out of isolation soon and was happy about that because he wanted to get his money so he can buy soda. Resident #25 Record review of Resident #25's Face Sheet dated 12/23/23 revealed, a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of ID, schizophrenia, anemia, anxiety, hallucinations, depression and scabies (onset date 12/11/23). Record review of Resident #25's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed, severely impaired cognition as indicated by a BIMS score of 00 out of 15, substantial to maximal assistance with most ADLs, and always incontinent of both bladder and bowel. There was no documentation of any applications of ointments/medication to the skin. Record review of Resident #25's undated Care Plan revealed, no related focus areas. There was no mention of any skin issues including rashes and scabies. Record review of Resident #25's Clinical Census revealed, Resident #25 shared a room with Resident #107 since 10/24/23. Record review of Resident #25's NP Note dated 11/27/23 revealed, no documented skin issues. Record review of Resident #25's NP Note dated 11/30/23 revealed- head to toe assessment done due to reports of patient had rash to both sides of his upper and lower extremities. He has elevated red bumps, dry scaly skin scattered to chest, abdominal area, back, both legs and arm but no rashes were observed on the web spaces of his hands, genitals or scalps. Monitor closes due to skin rash issues in the unit. Record review of Resident #25's NP Note dated 12/08/23 revealed, the resident was on hydrocortisone (steroid cream) for skin rash and the rash was unresolved. Record review of Resident #25's NP Note visit date 12/09/23 but signed on 12/18/23 revealed, Resident #25 was noted itching/scratching and had a persistent skin rash likely scabies. Resident #25 was treated with Sulfur 5% nightly for 3 days, with a plan to treat with Permethrin if the rash didn't resolve. Contact Isolation precautions and an oral medication to treat itching. Record review of Resident #25's Medical Diagnoses dated 12/23/23 at 12:57 PM, the diagnosis of scabies was added on 12/16/23 and the onset of the disease was 12/11/23. Record review of Resident #25's Order Summary dated 12/23/23 revealed: - 12/09/23- Sulfur 5% lotion for dermatitis, apply to entire body from neck down, rub in and leave on for 24 hours. - 12/11/23- Permethrin 5%- apply to head to toe topically one time only for scabies infestation. Leave on for 8-14 hours, use strict contact precautions with protective garments. - 12/11/23- Contact Isolation: use strict contact precautions with protective garments, every shift for scabies infestation. Record review of Resident #25's December 2023 MAR revealed, Resident #25 received Permethrin 5% on: - 12/12/23 at 08:43 AM - 12/20/23 at 12:52 AM Observation and interview on 12/13/2023 at 2:00 PM of the shared room of Resident #39, Resident #25 and Resident #107 with the Treatment Nurse revealed, the room door closed, with signage for contact isolation and a PPE cart at the door. Resident #25 was in the middle bed in a full body, long sleeve jump suite. When the Treatment Nurse removed his body suite, Resident #25 was observed with had light pink, small, raised bumps to both upper arms and on the abdomen. The Treatment Nurse stated he was treated with Hydrocortisone cream beginning 11/30/2023 for a rash to both arms and legs. Resident #37 Record review of Resident #37's Face Sheet dated 12/23/23 revealed, a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of: epilepsy, asthma, arthritis, type 2 diabetes and scabies with an onset date of 12/16/23. Record review of Resident #37's MDS dated [DATE] revealed, severely impaired cognition as indicated by a BIMS score of 05 out of 15, rejection of care, substantial/maximal assistance with most ADLs and application of ointments/medications to skin other than feet. Record review of Resident #37's undated Care Plan revealed, no documented focus areas addressing, skin, rashes or scabies. Record review of Resident #37's Census revealed he shared a room with Resident #107 from 08/28/23 to 09/23/23. Record review of Resident #37's Progress Notes from 12/22/22 to 12/23/23 revealed: - 09/22/23 at 02:33 PM the resident had a new rash to both arms, chest and legs. There was no documentation of the resident being placed on contact isolation. - 09/22/23 at 02:49 PM: Change of condition identified in a change in skin condition, the resident has a personal history of infectious and parasitic diseases. Skin Status Evaluation: itching rash and an order was given for Permethrin 5% to chest both legs and both arms which should be washed of in 8-12 hrs, hydrocortisone 1% cream for 7 days and calamine lotion for 2 weeks. There was no documentation of the resident being placed on contact isolation. - 10/02/23 at 10:34 PM: PERMETHRIN CREAM 5% APPLIED ON RESIDENT ENTIRE BODY THIS SHIFT AND TO BE WASHED OFF IN 8-12HRS. - 10/16/23 Resident on day 5/7 of antibiotics for cellulitis. Rash remains. - 10/18/23 Resident still on antibiotics for cellulitis. Rash still present and some itching noted. - 10/20/23 Resident still noted with rash all over his body and treatments continue - 10/27/23 Resident continues with steroid cream to the body for generalized rash, red raised bumps noted. - 10/40/23 Generalized rash red in color and bumpy. - 11/03/23 Rash present to body, generalized mild redness with complaints of mild itching. - 11/06/23 Rash still visible. - 11/08/23 Resident with generalized rash to body, some itching noted-redirected to avoid infection/pain. - 11/21/23 Resident seen by NP, new orders to apply steroid cream to rash all over his body twice daily for 30 days. - 11/24/23 Rash remains reddened pronounced and generalized. - 11/28/23 Rash remains reddened pronounced and generalized - 12/06/23 Rash remains reddened. Apply steroid cream to torso, back, upper extremities and thighs. - 12/13/23 Resident was on antibiotics for skin cellulitis and generalized rash remains to the entire body. Redness and self-inflicted scratches to the back, legs, arms, neck and abdomen noted. - 12/14/23 Rash with little improvement. - 12/15/23 generalized rash remains to the entire body. Redness and self-inflicted scratches to the back, legs, arms, neck and abdomen noted and worse. - 12/18/23 Day 1 of Permethrin 5% treatment to body An observation and interview on 12/12/23 at 09:55 AM revealed, Resident #37 lying in bed well dressed and well-groomed with rashes/scabs to his arms. When asked about the rash./sores the resident said everything was ok and would not respond further. Record review of Resident #37's NP Note dated 11/28/23 revealed, evaluation of dermatitis. Patient has rash to upper torso. Record review of Resident #37's NP Note dated 12/09/23 revealed, dermatitis unresolved. Record review of Resident #37's NP Note dated 12/12/23 revealed, dermatitis unresolved. Likely scabies infection will treat with Permethrin, repeat dose if not resolved and contact isolation precautions. Record review of Resident #37's Order Summary sprinted 12/23/23 revealed: - 06/23/23 Permethrin 5% for dermatitis, apply for 2 days. - 09/22/23 Permethrin 5%- apply to arms, legs, chest typically one time only written for 2 days. - 10/02/23 Permethrin 5% for scabies - Contact precautions- use contact precautions with protective garments. There are no previous orders for contact precautions - 12/16/23 Permethrin 5% for scabies. Use contact precautions with protective garments - 12/21/23 Permethrin 5% for scabies. Use contact precautions with protective garments Record review of Resident #37's September 2023 MAR printed 12/23/23 revealed: - 09/22/23 Permethrin 5% applied at 04:45 PM. - 09/22/23 to 09/29/23 hydrocortisone 1% to arms, legs, and chest for pruritis at 09:00 AM and 05:00 PM Record review of Resident #37's October 2023 MAR printed 12/23/23 revealed: - 10/02/23 Permethrin 5% applied at 09:29 PM. - 10/26/23 to 10/31/23 Hydrocortisone 2.5 % to legs, armpits, trunk nightly for dermatitis Record review of Resident #37's November 2023 MAR printed 12/23/23 revealed: - 11/01/23 to 11/06/23 Hydrocortisone 2.5 % to legs, armpits, trunk nightly for dermatitis Resident #84 Record review of Resident #84's Face Sheet dated 12/19/23 revealed, a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of: Parkinson, dementia, depression, communication deficit and scabies with onset of 12/16/23. Record review of Resident #84's MDS dated [DATE] revealed, moderately impaired cognition as indicated by a BIMS score of 09 out of 15, extensive assistance with most ADLs and application of ointments/medications to the skin other than the feet. Record review of Resident #84's undated Care Plan revealed, no focus areas address rashes, itching or scabies. Record review of Resident #84's Census revealed, he shared a room with Resident #107 from 08/28/23 to 09/23/23 Record review of Resident #84's Progress Notes from 12/22/22 to 12/23/23 revealed, - 09/15/23 Resident noted with rash to entire body. - 10/03/23 Rash red and bumpy in appearance to legs and right thigh. - 10/20/23 Resident still noted with rash all over his body, treatment continues - 10/23/23 Resident given oral steroids for rash to lower legs, and areas of dry skin - 11/03/23 rash to both legs present bumpy and red. - 11/06/23 Dermatology appointment cancelled and will be rescheduled. - 11/16/23 Rash remains reddened, raised and generalized. - 11/30/23 Resident given oral antifungal for rash. - 12/14/23 Resident rash to both legs with little improvement. -12/15/23 Generalized rash/itching remain the same Record review of Resident #84's Order Summary report printed 12/23/23 revealed - 12/16/23 Permethrin 5% for scabies. Use contact precautions with protective garments - 12/16/23 Contact precautions with protective garments every shift - 12/2/23 Permethrin 5% for scabies. Use contact precautions with protective garments An observation on 12/12/23 at 09:55 AM revealed, Resident # 84 lying in bed with a limited range of motion and wedge pillows propping him up. The resident was observed to have a rash on both his arms and had limited communication capability and all he could say his butt burned. In an interview on 12/12//23 at 10:00 AM, the treatment nurse said Resident #84 was previously treated for wounds on his buttocks but the medication was discontinued because the issue had resolved. She said she would visit the resident to reassess him, and notify the wound care doctor about the resident's complaints. The Treatment Nurse did not address the Resident #84's itching. Resident #20 Record review of Resident #20's Face Sheet dated 12/16/23 revealed, an [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses: dementia, mood disorder. Anxiety disorder and depression. Record review of Resident #20's 5 day MDS dated [DATE] revealed, severely intact cognition as indicated by a BIMS score of 00 out of 15, partial assistance with most ADLs and no application of ointments/medication to the skin. Record review of Resident #20's undated Care Plan revealed, focus- elopement risk/wanderer onset 04/17/23; intervention- intervene as appropriate, distract resident from wandering by offering pleasant diversion, food, conversations, television or books. The care plan does not address any skin issues. Record review of Resident #20's MD Note dated 12/13/23 revealed, resident was started on a steroid cream for itching for 7 days. Skin: new rash to the back of the hand with some redness around it. Record review of Resident #20's Order Summary dated 12/23/23 revealed: - 11/03/23 Prednisone ( a steroid) 20 mg- 1 tablet one time a day for rash for 3 days. - 11/03/23 Hydrocortisone 1 %- apply topically two times a day for rash/dry skin - 11/03/23 Diphenhydramine (Benadryl) 25 mg- give 1 tablet by mouth for rash. - 11/03/23 Prednisone 10 mg- 1 tablet by mouth 1 time a day for rash for 5 days starting 11/08/23. - 11/27/23 Prednisone 20 mg- give 2 tablets by mouth daily for pruritus. - 11/27/23 Diphenhydramine (Benadryl) 25 mg- give 1 tablet by mouth for rash. - 11/28/23 Hydrocortisone 1 % for pruritus- apply topically two times a day to torso, both upper and lower extremities. - 12/16/23 Permethrin 5% for scabies. Use contact precautions with protective garments - 12/16/23 Contact Precautions- use contact precautions with protective garments. - 12/21/23 Permethrin 5% for scabies. Use contact precautions with protective garments scheduled for 12/24/23 An observation and interview on 12/12/23 at 09:45 AM revealed, Resident #20 well dressed, well-groomed in a wheelchair in front of his room. The resident was wearing a long sleeve shirt but a rash could be seen at the end of the sleeve of his right arm and a skin tear on the back of his right arm. When asked questions the resident would only respond that he wanted coffee. An observation on 12/15/23 at 03:00 PM revealed, Resident #20 observed in the dining area with a rash on his right hand and arm, a skin tear to the right hand that appeared to be scabbed. An observation on 12/15/23 at 03:23 PM revealed, Resident #20 ambulating in his wheelchair to the front lobby. The resident attempted to open the office door and was instructed by the DON that he could not be in the hallway because he was on isolation. The resident left the office and headed toward the resident rooms, the DON did not escort the resident back to his room or get assistance from other staff. Resident #20 returned 5 minutes later with a mask on his face. In an observation and interview on 12/16/23 at 12:50 PM, Resident #20's room was observed to be empty and the Isolation signage as well as the bin were no longer at the resident's door. The DON said Resident #20 was removed from isolation because the facility was unable to keep him in his room and the resident roamed the building. An observation on 12/16/23 at 03:55 PM revealed, Resident #20 ambulating in the front lobby trying to get access to the office by pulling the door. Resident #100 Record review of Resident #100's Face Sheet dated 12/23/23 revealed, an [AGE] year-old man who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of: dementia, malnutrition, depression, anxiety and scabies with an onset date of 12/18/23. Record review of Resident #100's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 11/4/2023 revealed a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 0 out of 15 indicating Resident # was severely cognitively impaired. Section GG revealed the resident needed substantial/maximal assistance with toileting, showering/bathing, upper and lower body dressing, and personal hygiene. Section M1200 revealed Applications of ointments/medications other than to feet. Record review of Resident #100's Care Plan dated 4/28/2023 revealed in part . The resident has infection of the skin .the resident will be free from complications related to infection through the review date. Record review of Resident #100's Progress Notes from 12/22/22 to 12/23/23 revealed, - 05/09/23 Permethrin Cream treatment for rash all over body - 09/06/23 Resident receiving topical steroid for body itching, less scratching observed. - 10/16/23 Resident observed multiple times scratching arms and chest - 11/18/23 resident on oral medication for itching and continues to scratch - 12/14/23 mild redness raised area generalized to body. - 12/15/23 red rashes remains on different parts of the body and the resident was now on a topical steroid cream twice daily. - 12/17/23 resident placed on contact isolation precautions. Continues to scratch at sites Record review of resident #100's Orders Summary dared 12/23/23 revealed - 5/8/2023 revealed Permethrin External Cream 5% Apply head to Toes for itching for 2 days. - 12/17/2023 revealed Permethrin Cream 5% apply to affected areas topically at bedtime for scabies. - 12/17/23 Contact isolation-wear protective garments. Resident had no orders for contact isolation in May 2023. Record review of Resident #100's May 2023 MAR revealed, Permethrin was applied on 05/08/23 at 10:00 PM and 5/11/23. Record review of Review of Resident #100's NP note with [TRUNCATED]
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Transfer Notice (Tag F0623)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the 1 of 4 resident's (CR #75), representative of the transf...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the 1 of 4 resident's (CR #75), representative of the transfer or discharge and the reasons for the move in writing and send a copy of the notice to a representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, reviewed for discharges, in that: A notice in writing was not issued to CR #75's family member and to the Ombudsman following the facility-initiated discharge on [DATE]. This failure placed residents at risk of a being discharged without notification, their consent and not having their goals met. Findings included: Record review of CR#72's face sheet revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted into the facility on [DATE] and was discharged on 11/30/2023. The resident was diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease, anxiety disorder and dementia. Record review of CR #75's MDS, dated [DATE] revealed the resident ambulated by wheelchair and needed moderate to maximal assistance for most ADLs. Record review of CR #75's progress notes, dated 11/29/2023, reflected, Staff reports [CR #75] has been very agitated, refusing care, refusing tx, intrusive, getting into other ways, pushing and physically aggressive and combative with staff when staff attempting to redirect his current behavior. unable to verbally redirect his behaviors and current med plan was not effective to manage behavioral disturbance. Educated and encouraged him to stay away from others personal space and away from exit door due to wandering risk. Mumbling to self and continued to pull his clothing's off him. NP was here to assess and may need to have further evaluation and tx . SW spoke to [family member] regarding his current behavioral [sic] as he was placing self and other in danger, med intervention and referral to [hospital] . [family member] was in agreement with current plan of care. Record review of CR #75's progress notes, dated 11/30/2023, reflected, [CR #75] accepted at [hospital] for further evaluation and treatment. SW spoke to [receiving facility staff] regarding resident not able to return to the facility due to unable to meet his needs and placing self and others in danger . SW also spoke to [family member] regarding resident going to [hospital] for [evaluation] and treatment and Hospital and this SW will work in collaboration to look for an appropriate facility for continued care. Nursing and administration notified . Note written on the same day reflected, The resident was transferred . via stretcher by [EMS] personnel . In a phone interview with the SW on 12/18/23 on 2:34 PM, he stated he documented lengthy notes about CR #75's behavior and talked to the resident's family member about it. He stated he did not plan for the resident to return to the facility due to safety concerns and that was also discussed with the family member. He stated he did not write a letter disclosing the reason for the resident's discharge or send a copy to the Ombudsman because he did not have authority to do so, but only the Administrator had the authority. He stated he talked to Administrator A to issue that notice to the family. In a phone interview with the family member on 12/19/23 at 11:00 AM, she reported she was told the day of his discharge the reason for it and that he would not be returning to facility due to his condition. She stated she has since not been provided any letter or notice by either the SW or Administrator A regarding the conditions of his discharge. In a phone interview with the Ombudsman on 12/19/23 at 11:39 AM, she stated she was not given a discharge notice regarding CR #75. She said she was not sure if the facility knew to send her a copy of the notice of discharge. In an interview with BOM on 12/19/23 at 12:54 PM, she stated she would not have issued any immediate discharge notices, that would instead be the SW's role and the Administrator would send the notices out. She said she only handled discharges for financial reasons. In an interview with the Corporate Consultant Administrator on 12/19/2023 at 2:00PM, he stated after speaking with the Administrator A over the phone, she revealed to him that she did not issue any discharge notices to the family or Ombudsman concerning CR #75 prior to her resignation. In an interview with Administrator B on 12/20/2023 at 3:00PM, she stated she knew the physician, responsible party and the ombudsman should be notified of the reason of a facility-initiated discharge but did not know if a written notice was required to be given to the RP or ombudsman in the case of an immediate discharge to due possible endangerment to other residents as in CR #75's case. Record review of the facility's policy on Transfer or Discharge Notice, dated March 2021, reflected, . 5) The resident and representative are notified in writing of the following information: a. The specific reason for the transfer or discharge; b. The effective date of the transfer or discharge; c. The location wo which the resident was being transferred or discharged ; an explanation of the resident's rights to appeal the transfer or discharge to the state . 6) A copy of the notice was sent to the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman at the same time the notice of transfer of discharge was provided to the resident and representative .
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pharmacy Services (Tag F0755)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of 1 of 5 residents (Resident#8) and 1 of 3 Med Carts (100 Hall Back Nursing Cart) reviewed for pharmaceutical services. - The facility failed to ensure the 100 Hall Back Nursing Cart did not contain expired Byetta (an injectable drug used to manage blood sugars in residents with type 2 diabetes) for Resident #8. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the therapeutic benefit of medications, adverse reactions to medications and hospitalization. Findings include: Record review of Resident #8's Face Sheet dated 12/13/23 revealed, a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: unspecified dementia, hypertension, insomnia and type 2 diabetes. Record review of Resident #8's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed, moderately impaired cognition as indicated by a BIMS score of 10 out of 15, supervision with most ADLs and always incontinent of both bladder and bowel. Record review of Resident #8's undated Care Plan revealed, focus- type 2 diabetes; goal= no complications related to diabetes; intervention- diabetes medication as ordered by doctor. In an observation and interview on 12/15/23 at 10:07 AM, inventory of the medication 100 Hall Back Nursing Cart with LVN S revealed: - one open and in use Byetta 10 Pen for Resident #8 with an open date of 11/03/23 with pharmacy instructions to Discard 30 Days at room temperature (12/04/23). LVN S said nursing staff are expected to check their carts daily for expired and inappropriately labeled medications. She said multidose injectables/container are to be labeled with the date opened to track the expiration date and once expired the medication should not be used. LVN S said after injectable antidiabetic medications expired, they are less effective in controlling blood sugars and use could place residents at risk for uncontrolled blood sugars. She said since the medication could not be used it must be discarded immediately in the sharps container. In an interview on 12/18/23 at 01:20 PM, the DON said nursing carts should be checked daily as used for expired medications. She said injectable antidiabetic medications are labeled on the date in-use in order to track the expiration date and should before discarded once expired. The DON said after an injectable antidiabetic expired it becomes less effective and it should be discarded in the sharps container because use could place residents at risk for uncontrolled blood sugars. Record review of the facility policy titled Storage of Medications revised 09/2018 revealed, 8- Outdated, contaminated, or deteriorated medications and those in containers that are cracked, soiled, or without secure closures are immediately removed from inventory, disposed of according to procedures for medication disposal, and reordered from the pharmacy if a current order exists. III- Expiration Dating (Beyond-Use Dating); 5- When the original seal of a manufacturer's container or vial was initially broken, the container or vial will be dated. 8. All expired medications will be removed from the active supply and destroyed in accordance with facility policy, regardless of amount remaining. 9. Disposal of any medications prior to the expiration dating will be required if contamination or decomposition was apparent.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, included the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, the expiration date when applicable and stored all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments and under proper temperature controls, and permitted only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for 1 out of 4 medication carts (200 Hall Nursing Cart) reviewed for medication storage. - The facility failed to ensure the 200 Hall Front Nursing Cart did not contain inappropriately labeled and in use protein supplements. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the therapeutic benefit of medications or adverse reactions to medications. Findings Included: In an observation and interview on 12/15/23 at 10:04 AM, inventory of the 200 Hall Front Nursing Cart with the LVN R revealed: one open and in use bottle of Active Liquid Protein with no open date and manufacturer's instructions to discard 3 months after opening. LVN R said nursing staff are expected to check their carts daily as used for inappropriately labeled and expired supplements. He said multidose liquid protein containers should be labeled with the open date in order to track expiration. He said he was unaware that the liquid protein was only good for 3 months and since the bottle did not have an open date it could be expired and could not be used. He said use of expired liquid protein could place resident's at risk of GI upset so the item must be discarded. In an interview on 12/18/23 at 01:20 PM, the DON said nursing carts should be checked daily as used for expired and inappropriately labeled medications. She said injectable and multidose containers such as liquid protein are labeled on the date in-opened in order to track the expiration date and should before discarded once expired. The DON said the use of expired protein supplements could place residents at risk for GI issues so it must be discarded. Record review of the facility policy titled Storage of Medications revised 09/2018 revealed, 8- Outdated, contaminated, or deteriorated medications and those in containers that are cracked, soiled, or without secure closures are immediately removed from inventory, disposed of according to procedures for medication disposal, and reordered from the pharmacy if a current order exists. III- Expiration Dating (Beyond-Use Dating); 5- When the original seal of a manufacturer's container or vial was initially broken, the container or vial will be dated. 8. All expired medications will be removed from the active supply and destroyed in accordance with facility policy, regardless of amount remaining. 9. Disposal of any medications prior to the expiration dating will be required if contamination or decomposition was apparent.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0925 (Tag F0925)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility had effective pest control for one...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility had effective pest control for one of one kitchens, one of three hallways (Hall 200) and in one of five (Resident #14's room) resident rooms reviewed for pest control, in that: The kitchen was found to have multiple live gnats. The 200 Hall was found to have multiple live gnats. The 200 Hall and Resident #14's room was found to have a live cockroach crawling on the floor. This failure placed residents at risk for the potential spread of infection, cross-contamination, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #14's face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] and initially admitted on [DATE]. His diagnoses included paranoid schizophrenia, depression, dementia, heart disease and lack of coordination. Record review of Resident #14's annual MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMs score of 4 out of 10 indicating he had severe cognitive impairment. He required supervision with all ADLs. Observation and interview on 12/12/2023 at 11:05 AM, Resident #14 was sitting in a wheelchair next to his bed. Observed a live cockroach crawl across the floor in front of the resident. The resident stated that he had seen them before and shrugged his shoulders. Observation of the kitchen on 12/12/2023 at 9:15 AM, revealed multiple gnats flying around the kitchen and swarm of gnats flying out from underneath a bag of hamburger buns in dry storage. Observation on 12/12/2023 at 11:20 AM, revealed several gnats flying around in front of room [ROOM NUMBER]. In an interview with the Kitchen Manager on 12/12/2023 at 9:40 AM, she stated she had never seen that many gnats gather in one place in her kitchen like that before. She stated pest control services comes and treats their kitchen about once a month. In an interview with the Dietary aide on 12/12/2023 at 9:37AM, he stated he usually saw gnats flying around the kitchen primarily on the side where the was due to the drain being located in that area. He stated they have tried to treat the drains themselves with vinegar. He stated he was new so he could not recall how often he had seen pest control services come to the kitchen. Observation and interview on 12/16/2023 at 2:35 PM, a live cockroach was crawling on the floor between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]. ES H was in the hallway and stated that it was a cockroach and that the facility should not have them. ES H stepped on the cockroach and stated she would report it to the housekeeping supervisor. RN D was also present in the hallway and stated that she would report the cockroach to the Maintenance Director. In an interview with the Maintenance Director on 12/18/23 at 03:48 PM, stated their contracted services for pest control come about every other week and they always treated the kitchen before they left. He stated he recently got a new contracted service 2 months ago and before then, there used to be gnats all over the building. He stated gnats were the primary pest they were trying to manage in the kitchen. He said he had seen a collection of gnats in places in the kitchen before and stated, although it has gotten better, there was still room for improvement in managing the gnats in the kitchen. It's important to have effective pest control to keep pests out of food and to prevent infectious diseases from entering. In an interview on 12/20/2023 at 10:37 AM, the Maintenance Director stated he has worked at the facility for 3 years and there had been an issue with cockroaches and gnats for a long time. He stated the facility should not have them as cockroaches carry disease. He stated the facility had issues with the last pest control company and were not doing a good job. He stated a new pest control company started August 2023. In an interview on 12/20/2023 at 2:42 PM, the Maintenance Director stated no one reported to him about the cockroach seen on 12/16/2023. The Surveyor notified him of the cockroach seen in Resident #14's room. He said he would call Pest Control to come out and treat. In an interview on 12/23/2023 at 10:55 AM, the COO (Chief Officer of Operations) stated he was not the Administrator but stated that the building contracts with a Pest Company to not have issues like cockroaches and gnats. The COO stated every nursing home had them. The COO stated the facility did not have a written policy regarding Pest Control. In an interview on 12/23/2023 at 11:00 AM, the CNO (Chief Nursing Officer) stated cockroaches should not be in the building, they belong outside and that sometimes it cannot be helped that they are inside. The CNO stated the risk was that they are unsanitary. The CNO stated some of the residents have come from living on the streets and some residents like having all their belongings. The CNO stated it was their right to do so and all the facility can do was clean as soon as the resident's leave the rooms. Record review of facility's pest control contract revealed that contract, dated 07/18/2023 was active starting on 08/01/2023 and read in part: .Services to be performed .a)Performing Monthly pest control service, including: coordinating with clients staff to implement an Integrated Pest Management Plan, monitor and track pest issues inside and outside of facility .c) Inspecting and treating interior pest issues including kitchen, laundry, exits and closets . Record review of the facility's pest control service notifications, dated 11/27/2023, revealed the last time they received services were on 11/27/2023 and pest control was scheduled for only monthly visits. They reported seeing German cockroaches in the kitchen, room [ROOM NUMBER] and gnats in the hallways, with dirty drains in the kitchen, excessive moisture in the dish room . as the reason for pests.
Oct 2022 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Tube Feeding (Tag F0693)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents who are fed by enteral means received...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents who are fed by enteral means received the appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications of enteral feeding for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #77) reviewed for gastrostomy tube management. The facility failed to ensure Resident #77's head was elevated at a minimum of 30-degree angle during enteral feeding ( a way to deliver food directly to the stomach) via gastrostomy tube (G-tube) (A tube directly inserted through the skin to the stomach to deliver nutrition). This failure could place residents who receive enteral feedings by G-tube at risk for injury, aspiration into the lungs ( fluid or food enter the lungs accidently), decreased quality of life, hospitalization and decline in health. Findings include: Record review of Resident #77's clinical record revealed a [AGE] year-old-male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a cerebral infarction (paralysis to one side of the body following a stroke), tracheostomy (a hole made into the trachea in the neck for breathing), chronic respiratory failure, gastrostomy status (feeding tube directly into the stomach for delivery of food/ nutrition), and tachycardia (rapid heartbeat). Record review of Resident #77's MDS dated [DATE] revealed, the resident's BIMS score was unable to be scored. The resident's cognitive skills for daily decision making was coded as severely impaired. Resident #77 was total dependent on one staff for bed mobility. Nutritional approach indicated Resident #77 required a feeding tube. Record review of Resident #77's October Physician Order Summary dated 09/23/2022, revealed Enteral Feeding every shift for strict aspiration precautions elevate head of bed at least 45 degrees during enteral feedings, water flushes, medication administration and one hour after any of these procedures. Record review of Resident #77's Care Plan date initiated 10/17/2022 revealed: Focus: Resident #77 required tube feeding; Goal: Resident #77 will be free of aspiration. Intervention: The resident needed the head of the bed elevated 30 degrees during and 30minute after tube feeding. In an observation on 10/26/2022 at 10:03 AM, accompanied by LVN B Resident #77 was observed in bed with the head of bed (HOB) flat, he was awake but nonverbal. Resident #77's tube feeding was infusing via pump at 55ml/hour. In an interview on 10/26/2022 at 10:04 AM, LVN B (also the unit manager) stated Resident #77's HOB was flat and was not the proper position for a resident with a tube feeding running. LVN B stated the HOB should be elevated at 45 degrees, she said did not know how long he was flat or why he was flat in bed. LVN B stated the nurses were responsible for making sure the resident was in the correct position and the HOB elevated when making rounds. The risk to the resident was he could aspirate (fluid or food enter into the lungs). In an interview on 10/26/2022 at 10:05 AM, the DON entered Resident #77's room and stated the residents HOB was not in the proper position for the tube feeding and should be at least 30 degrees, she elevated the HOB. The DON stated the unit manager was responsible for making sure the resident was in the correct position. The risk to the resident was aspiration. In an Interview on 10/26/22 at 10:50 AM, the Administrator stated he did not have specific clinical experience only what he had picked up over the years. The Administrator stated he knew the HOB for a resident with a tube feeding needed to be elevated. The Administrator stated the reason was to prevent the tube feeding from backing up and chocking the resident. He stated the DON did correct this occurrence by elevating the residents HOB. To prevent this from occurring again we will discipline the staff member and in-service all employees. Record review of the facility policy titled Verifying Placement of Feeding Tubes Updated 06/07/2021 read in part . Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: . 2. Resident's head-of-bed (HOB) should be kept elevated at a minimum 30 degrees at all times during the administration of feedings or medications to prevent aspiration and pneumonia, unless otherwise specified in medical orders or communications for other reasons .
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • 38% turnover. Below Texas's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: 9 life-threatening violation(s), $107,493 in fines, Payment denial on record. Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 23 deficiencies on record, including 9 critical (life-threatening) violations. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
  • • $107,493 in fines. Extremely high, among the most fined facilities in Texas. Major compliance failures.
  • • Grade F (0/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: This facility has 9 Immediate Jeopardy findings. Serious concerns require careful evaluation.

About This Facility

What is Avir At Arden Wood's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns AVIR AT ARDEN WOOD an overall rating of 1 out of 5 stars, which is considered much below average nationally. Within Texas, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.

How is Avir At Arden Wood Staffed?

CMS rates AVIR AT ARDEN WOOD's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 38%, compared to the Texas average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.

What Have Inspectors Found at Avir At Arden Wood?

State health inspectors documented 23 deficiencies at AVIR AT ARDEN WOOD during 2022 to 2025. These included: 9 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death) and 14 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.

Who Owns and Operates Avir At Arden Wood?

AVIR AT ARDEN WOOD is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 174 certified beds and approximately 120 residents (about 69% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in HOUSTON, Texas.

How Does Avir At Arden Wood Compare to Other Texas Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Texas, AVIR AT ARDEN WOOD's overall rating (1 stars) is below the state average of 2.8, staff turnover (38%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (1 stars) is much below the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Avir At Arden Wood?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations.

Is Avir At Arden Wood Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, AVIR AT ARDEN WOOD has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 9 Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 1-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Texas. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.

Do Nurses at Avir At Arden Wood Stick Around?

AVIR AT ARDEN WOOD has a staff turnover rate of 38%, which is about average for Texas nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.

Was Avir At Arden Wood Ever Fined?

AVIR AT ARDEN WOOD has been fined $107,493 across 1 penalty action. This is 3.1x the Texas average of $34,154. Fines at this level are uncommon and typically indicate a pattern of serious deficiencies, repeated violations, or failure to correct problems promptly. CMS reserves penalties of this magnitude for facilities that pose significant, documented risk to resident health or safety. Families should request specific documentation of what issues led to these fines and what systemic changes have been implemented.

Is Avir At Arden Wood on Any Federal Watch List?

AVIR AT ARDEN WOOD is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.