CHAMPIONS HEALTHCARE AT WILLOWBROOK

13500 BRETON RIDGE, HOUSTON, TX 77070 (281) 807-4744
For profit - Corporation 98 Beds THE ENSIGN GROUP Data: November 2025 1 Immediate Jeopardy citation
Trust Grade
38/100
#668 of 1168 in TX
Last Inspection: February 2025

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Champions Healthcare at Willowbrook has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns and a poor overall rating. They rank #668 out of 1168 nursing homes in Texas, placing them in the bottom half of facilities statewide, and #54 out of 95 in Harris County, meaning only a few local options are rated lower. The facility is reportedly improving, with issues decreasing from 6 in 2024 to just 1 in 2025, but staffing is a concern, with a turnover rate of 62%, much higher than the Texas average of 50%. The home has been fined a total of $47,300, which is concerning as it reflects ongoing compliance issues. While there is good RN coverage, exceeding 81% of Texas facilities, there have been critical findings, including failure to maintain safe temperatures for residents and inadequate food safety measures, which pose risks to health and comfort.

Trust Score
F
38/100
In Texas
#668/1168
Bottom 43%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Getting Better
6 → 1 violations
Staff Stability
⚠ Watch
62% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
Penalties
⚠ Watch
$47,300 in fines. Higher than 78% of Texas facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
Skilled Nurses
○ Average
Each resident gets 33 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for Texas. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
Violations
⚠ Watch
12 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Overall Rating
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Staff Levels
★★★☆☆
3.0
Care Quality
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2024: 6 issues
2025: 1 issues

The Good

  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in fire safety.

The Bad

2-Star Overall Rating

Below Texas average (2.8)

Below average - review inspection findings carefully

Staff Turnover: 62%

16pts above Texas avg (46%)

Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity

Federal Fines: $47,300

Above median ($33,413)

Moderate penalties - review what triggered them

Chain: THE ENSIGN GROUP

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

Staff turnover is elevated (62%)

14 points above Texas average of 48%

The Ugly 12 deficiencies on record

1 life-threatening
Feb 2025 1 deficiency 1 IJ (1 facility-wide)
CRITICAL (L) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Safe Environment (Tag F0584)

Someone could have died · This affected most or all residents

⚠️ Facility-wide issue

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure comfortable and safe temperatures were maintain...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure comfortable and safe temperatures were maintained between 71F - 81F for 20 out of 20 residents (#2, #5, #9, #15, #17, #19, #21, #23, #24, #31, #35, #42, #45, #47, #49, #53, #57, #77, #140, and #190) reviewed for a safe and comfortable environment. - The facility failed to have a working heating system that provided heat to all resident rooms and used portable space heaters that did not monitor and adjust to room temperature but instead put out fixed heat, leaving some residents cold and room temperatures below 71 degrees Fahrenheit. - Observations and temperature measurements of resident rooms in the 100-hall ranged from 67.1 to 70.4 degrees Fahrenheit. - Observations and temperature measurements of resident rooms in the 200 hall ranged from 64.6 to 70.2 degrees Fahrenheit. - Facility records reported temperature measurements as low at 64 degrees Fahrenheit. An IJ was identified on (02/19/25). The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE]) at (06:15 PM). While the IJ was removed on (02/24/25), the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of widespread and a severity level of no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that was not immediate jeopardy. These failures placed residents at risk of hypothermia, illness, and a decline in their quality of life. Findings included: Record review of the facility census dated 02/18/2025 revealed out of 81 residents, 79 residents resided in private rooms. Observations and interview with the Administrator on 2/19/25 at 2:40PM revealed facility had a blanket warming unit set a 180F and extra comforters and linens in their linen storage. The Administrator revealed that this building was purchased and taken over by the company in the month of November. This occurred without knowledge of the failed heating/chiller system. She stated the system was so outdated, they do not have replacement parts to make repairs. She said ultimately the whole system would need to be replaced and that it would take a while to do so. She did not give a time frame. She stated in the meantime, they had ordered portable heaters and placed them in residents' rooms to keep them warm, they also had blankets and linens that can be put in the blanket warmer and given to residents who were cold. She stated staff check in on the residents often to ensure they were warm and they will also offer warm beverages to them. Observations and interviews from 2/19/25 from 2:10pm to 2:45pm of temperature measurements of resident rooms using Instant Read Digital Thermometer revealed: - Resident #23's room temperature was 69°F in the center of the room, 76°F near space heater. Resident was not present. - Resident #19's room temperature was 67.2°F in the center of the room. There was not a space heater, and the resident was not present. - Resident #41's room temperature was 70.4°F in the center of the room and 77°F near the space heater. - Resident #15's room temperature was 65.7°F in the center of the room with no space heater. - Resident #34's room temperature was 66.7°F in the center of the room with no space heater Observations and interviews on 02/19/25 from 11:00 PM through 02/20/24 at 12:30 AM revealed the following: - Resident #5's room temperature measured at 73.8 degrees Fahrenheit. She said previously she was freezing and was not used to the cold but then an angel brought her the heater so she was warm. She reported that it had been cold for the last 1-2 days. - Resident #140 room temperature was measured at 77.4 degrees Fahrenheit. The resident was accompanied by his family member. The resident said the temperature in his room was ok. The resident reported since she lost weight, she has been cold, and she had been cold ever since she came to the facility 5 days ago. The resident reported that facility staff gave her a heater today and she was warm. The resident reported that she informed a staff member in therapy that she was cold, so he brought her a heavy blanket as well as 2 heavy shirts and pants since all she had were gowns. - Resident #41's room temperature was measured at 77.5 degrees Fahrenheit. He said he felt good and warm, he was slightly chilly prior to receiving his heater 2 weeks ago. - Resident #77's room temperature was measured at 77.0 degrees Fahrenheit. He said he felt toasty but was cold in the past. Resident #2 Record review of Resident #2's admission Record revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] and originally admitted on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included: heart failure, muscle weakness, high blood pressure, age related cognitive decline. Record review of Resident #2's MDS dated [DATE] revealed severely impaired cognition as indicated by a BIMS score of 05 out of 15. In an interview and observation on 02/19/2025 at 2:25 pm, Resident #2 stated she was comfortable. The resident's room contained a heater that the caregiver in the room at the time of the observation stated was supplied by the family. The temperature measured was 65.5 degrees Fahrenheit with an Instant Read Digital Thermometer. In an interview and observation on 02/20/25 at 9:48 am, with Resident #2 reported she had no signs and symptoms of flu, cold or pneumonia. The temperature in the resident's room was measured with an Infrared Thermometer by door on floor 63.2 degrees Fahrenheit, and by window on floor 61.5 degrees Fahrenheit. Resident #9 Record review of Resident #9's face sheet dated 02/23/2025, revealed a [AGE] year-old female who admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis that included Parkinson's Disease and Type 2 Diabetes. Record review of Resident #9's MDS assessment, dated 11/21/2024, revealed a BIMS score of 8, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Observations of Resident #9's room on 2/20/2025 at 10:26AM, revealed the temperature was 70.3 degrees. Resident #9 was sleeping in bed. Resident #15 Record review of Resident #15's face sheet dated 02/23/2025, revealed a [AGE] year-old female who admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Adjustment Disorder with Mixed Anxiety and Depressed Mood, Morbid (Severe) Obesity Due to Excess Calories, and Type 2 Diabetes. Record review of Resident #15's BIMS assessment dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS score of 14, indicating resident was cognitively intact. Observations and Interview of Resident #15 on 2/20/2025 at 10:16AM, revealed the temperature in the resident room was 74.8 degrees. Resident #15 reported the temperature in the room was fine for the last month. It was a little chilly this morning but they adjusted the temp on the space heater and now it's great. Resident #17 Record review of Resident #17's admission Record revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] and originally admitted on [DATE]. His diagnoses included: obesity, abnormal gait, unsteady on feet, and high blood pressure. Record review of Resident #17's MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 12 out of 15 indicating he had moderately impaired cognition. Record review of Resident #17's undated Care Plan revealed resident refused to turn heater on. In an interview and observation on 02/19/2025 at 2:40 pm, Resident #17 stated he didn't want a heater and he felt comfortable. The resident's room was observed to not contain a heater and the temperature measured was 67.1 degrees Fahrenheit with an Instant Read Digital Thermometer. Resident #19 Record review of Resident #19's face sheet, dated 02/25/2025, revealed an [AGE] year-old male who was admitted into the facility on [DATE] and was diagnosed with hypertension and left femur fracture. Record review of Resident #19's BIMS score, dated 02/02/2025, reflected a score of 15, indicating the resident's cognition was intact. Observations of Resident #19's room on 02/19/2025 at 2:10PM, revealed the resident's room was temped at 67.2F Resident #21 Record review of Resident #21's admission Record revealed a [AGE] year-old-female re-admitted on [DATE] and initially admitted on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included: low back pain, abnormal gait, muscle weakness, obesity, swelling. Record review of Resident #21's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 15 indicating intact cognition. In an interview and observation on 02/19/25 at 2:19 pm, Resident #21 said she was cold. The resident's room did not contain a heater and the temperature was measured at 64.6 degrees Fahrenheit with an Instant Read Digital Thermometer. Resident #24 Observation an Interview with Resident #24 on 02/19/25 at 01:45 PM revealed, the resident's room measured 67.4 degrees Fahrenheit and there was no heater present in the room. The resident did not speak English and translation was performed by the Case Manager. The Case Manager reported that the resident did not have any issues with the temperature in her room and the resident did not feel cold at any time. Resident #31 Record review of Resident #31's face sheet dated 02/21/2025 indicated a [AGE] year-old male readmitted to the facility on [DATE] and initially admitted on [DATE]. His diagnoses included dementia, stroke, hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body), hypertension, acute kidney failure. Record review of Resident #31's comprehensive MDS dated [DATE] indicated under section C - cognitive patterns, he had short term and long-term memory problems. He also had moderately impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making. The BIMS summary score was blank. Observation and interview with Resident #31 on 02/19/25 at 01:23 PM revealed, a portable heater in use in the resident room. Measurement revealed the room temperature to be 70.3 degrees Fahrenheit. The resident was only able to communicate with head and hand gestures, the resident gestured that he did not feel cold by shaking his head from left to right when asked if he felt cold. Observations and interview with Resident #31 on 2/20/25 at 2:30PM, using instant read digital thermometer, the heat of Resident 31's heater, that was in use at the time, Resident #31 gestured that he felt cold using body language and limited verbal communication. Resident #35 An observation and interview of Resident #35 on 02/19/25 at 01:20 PM revealed, the room temperature measured at 67.3 and there was no heater present in the resident's room. Resident #35 stated that she was cold in her room and would have to get under her blankets to get warm. Resident #42 Record review of Resident #42's admission Record revealed a [AGE] year-old-female readmitted on [DATE] and originally admitted on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included: stroke, muscle weakness, left leg below knee absence, lack of coordination, high blood pressure. Record review of Resident #42's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 13 indicating she was cognitively intact. In an Interview and observation on 02/19/25 at 2:14 pm, Resident #42's room did not have a heater. She stated she did not ask for a heater and she was cold. The residents room measured 67.2 degrees Fahrenheit with an Instant Read Digital Thermometer. In an interview and observation on 02/20/25 at 9:43 am with Resident #42, she stated she slept well, was comfortable and had no concerns about her environment. The temperature measured with an Infrared Thermometer with Laser by floor by the door 65.3 degrees Fahrenheit. Resident #45 Record review of Resident #45's face sheet, dated 02/25/2025, revealed a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted into the facility on [DATE] and was diagnosed with vascular dementia and cerebral infarction. Record review of Resident #45's BIMS score, dated 02/02/2025, reflected a score of 7, indicating the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. Observation of Resident #45's room on 02/19/2025 at 2:14PM, revealed resident's room was temped at 67.1F with a space heater not in use. Resident #45 reported feeling comfortable in her room at this time. Observation and interview with Resident #45 on 02/19/2025 at 3:10PM, revealed the resident lying in bed awake and he reported his room felt cold. The resident's space heater was in use at this time. Resident #47 Record review of Resident #47's face sheet, dated 02/25/2024 revealed an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted into the facility on [DATE] and was diagnosed with high blood pressure and emphysema. Record review of Resident #47's BIMS score, dated 01/07/2025, reflected a score of 13, indicating the resident had no cognitive impairment. Observation and interview with Resident #47 on 02/19/2025 at 9:30AM, she stated a family member brought a personal space heater for her in January of 2025 because it was cold in her room. Resident #49 Observation and Interview of Resident #49 on 02/19/25 at 01:00 PM revealed, the temperature measured 68.2 Fahrenheit and there was an unplugged heater in the room. The resident stated she had a heater and did not need it and she had no problems with the room temperature. Resident #53 Observation of Resident #53's room on 02/19/25 at 01:30 PM revealed, the resident was asleep. A heater was observed in box and the temperature was measured at 67.9 degrees Fahrenheit. Resident #57 Record review of Resident #57's admission Record revealed a [AGE] year-old-male readmitted on [DATE] and initially admitted on [DATE]. His diagnoses included: stroke, muscle weakness, difficulty with swallowing, high blood pressure. Record review of Resident #57's MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 12 indicating he had moderately impaired cognition. In an interview and observation on 02/19/2025 at 2:30 pm, Resident #57 stated he was cold. There was no heater observed in the resident's room and she stated the facility took the heater away yesterday. The temperature in the resident's room measured 65.5 degrees Fahrenheit with an Instant Read Digital Thermometer. In an interview and observation on 02/20/25 at 9:52 am, Resident #57 stated he rested comfortably, he liked it cool and did not feel cold. The temperature in the resident's room was measured with an Infrared Thermometer with as 69.8 degrees Fahrenheit Laser by door on floor, and 67.5 degrees Fahrenheit on floor by bed. Resident #190 Record review of Resident #190's face sheet, dated 02/25/2024 revealed an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted into the facility on [DATE] and was diagnosed with a cerebral infarction and stage 3 kidney disease. Record review of Resident #190's BIMS score, dated 02/03/2025, reflected a score of 2, indicating the resident had severe cognitive impairment. Observation and interview with Resident #190's, on 02/19/2025 at 2:23PM, revealed resident's room was temped at 69.7F while using a space heater that was emitting heat around 89F. In an interview on 2/19/2025 at 5:09 pm, the Administrator stated there could be harm to residents if temperatures go below 68 degrees Fahrenheit. The potential harm could be difficulty with breathing, and hypothermia. The plan for nursing facility was to monitor ambient temperatures every 2 hours. If temperatures go below 60 degrees Fahrenheit, the residents would be transferred to the assisted living side. Temperatures at 60 degrees Fahrenheit and above, the facility was to offer warm blankets and hot beverages. Nursing and CNA staff were monitoring resident vital signs two times a shift or every 6 hours. Temperature checks were occurring every two hours throughout the building. In an interview on 2/19/2025 at 5:15 pm, the DON reported potential harm for residents if temperatures go below 68 degrees Fahrenheit were hypothermia, potential falls, and difficulty with breathing. The plan for the facility if temperatures are at or above 60 degrees Fahrenheit is to place portable heaters in resident rooms, offer warm blankets, warm drinks, and temperature checks every two hours by maintenance director. If temperatures go below 60 degrees Fahrenheit, the plan would be to transfer residents to the assisted living side. In an interview on 2/20/25 at 9:34 am, LVN G stated residents were monitored every two hours with regards to comfort level as far as temperatures. LVN G stated no resident had any temperature under 97 physically and rooms were warm, if resident complained of being cold, a warm blanket, warm liquids were administered. LVN G reported CNA's reported any concerns regarding environmental temperatures to her. In an interview and observation on 2/20/25 at 9:37 am the maintenance director. He stated temperatures were taken every two hours by CNA's and nurses and logged overnight. Temperatures were maintained between 68 degrees Fahrenheit and 73 degrees Fahrenheit last night and there were no concerns regarding resident comfort. In an interview on 02/20/25 at 9:59 pm, LVN S, stated he had been monitoring residents with CNA's every two hours. LVN S asked residents if they felt cold or too hot and if they reported if they were feeling chilly would give them a blanket and warm liquids if needed. CNA's reported to him any concerns that residents had and none of his residents had had any signs of symptoms of cold, flu, or pneumonia. In an interview on 02/20/25 at 10:27am with the Director of Rehab, she stated that only one resident had complained to her about the temperature in their room in the last 30 days. Resident #15 had complained she was cold this morning. The space heater temperature was adjusted. She reported that she was not aware of any residents that had suffered any adverse effects due to the temperature in their room. In an interview and observation on 2/20/2025 at 10:40 AM, CNA V stated she started working at the facility two months ago. She stated the heating issue just happened due to the snow and indoor temperatures were fine before when it was warm. She stated that she makes sure plenty of blankets were available for her residents. She stated the laundry staff stock the linen closet with blankets and was never short of blankets. In an interview and observation on 2/20/2025 at 10:50 AM, Laundry B was observed re-stocking blankets in the linen closet near Room134. She stated she had been working at the facility since July 2024. A blanket warmer tower was in the closet with blankets on the shelves. She stated the laundry room was in another building. She stated she would load the warm blankets from the drier into a clean container for transport covered then restocks the closets. She stated she ensures the blanket warmer was well stocked. She stated she understood that the residents were elderly and often get cold easily. She stated she restocked closets often as soon as the blankets were ready from dryers. In an interview on 2/20/2025 at 10:54 AM RN D stated she started working at the facility eight weeks ago. She stated she would check her residents often and communicates with CNAs regarding comfort and safety of residents who have portable heaters. She was able to verbalize signs and symptoms of drops in resident temperatures such as confusion, signs, and symptoms of PNA (pneumonia) or colds. She denied any issues with blankets for the residents. She stated she checked residents regularly and assessed for change of condition and seeing to their needs. In an interview on 2/20/2025 at 11:10 AM the Unit Manager stated she started working at the facility in July 2024. She stated even before the extreme cold weather, they had conducted trainings for emergency extreme weather preparedness. She stated she checked residents and continues to check often for signs and symptoms of PNA, colds or changes in comfort level. She was able to verbalize signs and symptoms appropriately. In an interview on 2/20/2025 at 11:17 AM RN D stated due to the extreme cold weather, they also have a blanket warmer. She stated she frequently assessed her residents for changes in temperature and comfort level. She stated all her residents had no complaints and had no concerns with their health during the extreme cold weather. She was able to verbalize signs and symptoms of hypothermia, PNA, colds, flu signs and symptoms. In an interview and observation on 2/20/2025 at 11:38 AM CNA S stated she started working at the facility one month ago. She was able to verbalize her understanding of monitoring her residents for comfort and safety. She was observed to check on room [ROOM NUMBER] and asked the resident if she needed anything and reminded the resident to use the call light when needed. She stated she would go to Hall #3 on the first floor to retrieve blankets from the blanket warmer and had no issues with supplies of blankets. She stated that she would report to her nurse any change of condition in her residents especially during this time of extreme cold. She stated she would observe the environment and would use her senses in assessing a resident who cannot verbalize comfort or discomfort with the room temperature. In an interview on 2/20/2025 at 12:07 PM LVN C stated she has been working at this facility for one month but had worked for the company many years in another state. She stated all her residents in Hall 3 have portable heaters and AC units. She stated she had no resident concerns and said she sees residents frequently on her shift and always assesses her residents for signs and symptoms of PNA, cold and flu including assessing non-verbal residents. She said she communicates with CNAs regularly to ensure resident comfort and safety. She had no issues with supply of blankets. She stated some residents like it cold, others want room warm therefore some want more blankets others may not want them at all. Record review of facility 'Temperature and Room Safety Check' dated 01/21/25 revealed: - room [ROOM NUMBER] at 08:00 PM- 70 degrees Fahrenheit - room [ROOM NUMBER] at 04:00 AM- 69 degrees Fahrenheit - room [ROOM NUMBER] at 02:00 AM- 70 degrees Fahrenheit - room [ROOM NUMBER] at 04:00 AM- 70 degrees Fahrenheit - room [ROOM NUMBER] at 02:00 AM- 70 degrees Fahrenheit - room [ROOM NUMBER] at 10:00 PM- 70 degrees Fahrenheit - room [ROOM NUMBER] at 12:00 AM- 70 degrees Fahrenheit - room [ROOM NUMBER] at 08:00 PM- 69 degrees Fahrenheit - room [ROOM NUMBER] at 08:00 PM- 68 degrees Fahrenheit Record review of facility ' 100 Hall Temperature and Room Safety Check' dated 02/18/25 revealed: - room [ROOM NUMBER] at 08:00 PM- 69 degrees Fahrenheit - room [ROOM NUMBER] at 04:00 AM- 70 degrees Fahrenheit - room [ROOM NUMBER] at 06:00 AM- 70 degrees Fahrenheit - room [ROOM NUMBER] at 08:00 PM- 68 degrees Fahrenheit - room [ROOM NUMBER] at 12:00 AM- 70 degrees Fahrenheit - room [ROOM NUMBER] at 02:00 AM- 70 degrees Fahrenheit - room [ROOM NUMBER] at 04:00 AM- 70 degrees Fahrenheit - room [ROOM NUMBER] at 06:00 AM- 70 degrees Fahrenheit - room [ROOM NUMBER] at 10:00 PM- 70 degrees Fahrenheit - room [ROOM NUMBER] at 02:00 PM- 70 degrees Fahrenheit - room [ROOM NUMBER] at 08:00 PM- 70 degrees Fahrenheit - room [ROOM NUMBER] at 10:00 PM- 70 degrees Fahrenheit - room [ROOM NUMBER] at 04:00 AM- 70 degrees Fahrenheit - room [ROOM NUMBER] at 12:00 AM- 70 degrees Fahrenheit - room [ROOM NUMBER] at 02:00 AM- 70 degrees Fahrenheit - room [ROOM NUMBER] at 06:00 AM- 70 degrees Fahrenheit - room [ROOM NUMBER] at 12:00 AM- 70 degrees Fahrenheit - room [ROOM NUMBER] at 04:00 AM- 70 degrees Fahrenheit - room [ROOM NUMBER] at 10:00 PM- 70 degrees Fahrenheit - room [ROOM NUMBER] at 10:00 PM- 70 degrees Fahrenheit - room [ROOM NUMBER] at 06:00 AM- 70 degrees Fahrenheit - room [ROOM NUMBER] at 08:00 PM- 69 degrees Fahrenheit - room [ROOM NUMBER] at 12:00 AM- 68 degrees Fahrenheit - room [ROOM NUMBER] at 12:00 AM- 68 degrees Fahrenheit Record review of facility ' 200 Hall Temperature and Room Safety Check' dated 02/18/25 revealed: - room [ROOM NUMBER] at 04:00 AM- 70 degrees Fahrenheit - room [ROOM NUMBER] at 06:00 AM- 69 degrees Fahrenheit - room [ROOM NUMBER] at 04:00 AM- 70 degrees Fahrenheit - room [ROOM NUMBER] at 06:00 AM- 68 degrees Fahrenheit - room [ROOM NUMBER] at 04:00 AM- 64 degrees Fahrenheit - room [ROOM NUMBER] at 06:00 AM- 62 degrees Fahrenheit - room [ROOM NUMBER] at 04:00 AM- 67 degrees Fahrenheit - room [ROOM NUMBER] at 06:00 AM- 69 degrees Fahrenheit - room [ROOM NUMBER] at 04:00 AM- 69 degrees Fahrenheit - room [ROOM NUMBER] at 04:00 AM- 68 degrees Fahrenheit - room [ROOM NUMBER] at 04:00 AM- 68 degrees Fahrenheit - room [ROOM NUMBER] at 08:00 PM and 10:00 PM- 70 degrees Fahrenheit - room [ROOM NUMBER] at 08:00 PM- 68 degrees Fahrenheit - room [ROOM NUMBER] at 10:00 PM- 71 degrees Fahrenheit - room [ROOM NUMBER] at 04:00 AM- 61 degrees Fahrenheit - room [ROOM NUMBER] at 06:00 AM- 61 degrees Fahrenheit - room [ROOM NUMBER] at 08:00 PM- 69 degrees Fahrenheit - room [ROOM NUMBER] at 04:00 AM- 67 degrees Fahrenheit - room [ROOM NUMBER] at 06:00 AM- 67 degrees Fahrenheit - room [ROOM NUMBER] at 04:00 AM- 66 degrees Fahrenheit - room [ROOM NUMBER] at 06:00 AM- 65 degrees Fahrenheit - room [ROOM NUMBER] at 04:00 AM- 68 degrees Fahrenheit - room [ROOM NUMBER] at 06:00 AM- 67 degrees Fahrenheit - room [ROOM NUMBER] at 04:00 AM- 68 degrees Fahrenheit - room [ROOM NUMBER] at 06:00 AM- 69 degrees Fahrenheit - room [ROOM NUMBER] at 04:00 AM- 64 degrees Fahrenheit - room [ROOM NUMBER] at 06:00 AM- 63 degrees Fahrenheit - room [ROOM NUMBER] at 04:00 AM- 67 degrees Fahrenheit - room [ROOM NUMBER] at 06:00 AM- 66 degrees Fahrenheit Record review of the 10 Day weather forecast at the facility location dated 02/19/25 at 04:04 PM revealed, -Wednesday 02/19/25: the low would be 20 degrees Fahrenheit - Thursday 02/20/25: 28 to 37 degrees Fahrenheit - Friday 02/21/25: 31 to 37 degrees Fahrenheit - Saturday 02/22/25: 39 to 44 degrees Fahrenheit - Sunday 02/23/25: 41 to 60 degrees Fahrenheit - Monday 02/24/25: 47 to 70 degrees Fahrenheit - Tuesday 02/25/25: 53 to 76 degrees Fahrenheit Record review of the facility's policies on a Homelike Environment, dated October 2009, reflected, .1. Staff shall provide person-centered care that emphasizes the residents' comfort, independence and personal needs and preferences. 2. The facility staff and management shall maximize, to the extent possible, the characteristics of the facility that reflect a personalized, homelike setting. These characteristics include: a. Cleanliness and order; b. Comfortable (minimum glare) yet adequate (suitable to the task) lighting; c. Inviting colors and decor; d. Pleasant, neutral scents; e. Plants and flowers, where appropriate; f. Comfortable temperatures . An immediate jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 02/19/2025. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 6:15PM. On 02/21/2025 at 7:29PM, the following Plan of Removal was accepted: Monitoring for Plan of Removal: . F 584 The facility failed to ensure resident comfort and safety by failing to maintain a temperature range between 71-81 degrees Fahrenheit. The facility census is 81 and consists of 80 rooms with malfunctioning centralized heating and are unable to control temperatures within individual resident rooms placing resident at risk of feeling cold, worsening health conditions, pain and hypothermia. The facility needs to develop and implement a system ensuring that all resident rooms are within safe and comfortable temperatures of 71-81 degrees Fahrenheit. Immediate action: 1. The Medical Director was notified by the Executive Director on 2/19/2025 at 8:18pm. 2. The Extreme Cold Procedure was reviewed by Executive Director, DON, Maintenance Director and Medical Director. The Cold Alert Procedure was reviewed by ED, DON, Maintenance Director and Medical Director, temperature was changed to 65F on 2/20/25. The temperature was changed from 60F to 65F. 3. Executive Director, DON and Maintenance Director were reeducated on regulations re: resident room comfortable temperature range and a Comfortable Room Temperature Policy was written by the Life Safety Resource on 2/19/25. The education was provided by the Life Safety Resource. 4. Room Temperatures were audited by Department Heads to identify rooms needing space heaters on 2/19/25. [name of company] repaired the condensing loop system on 2/10/25. They provided a quote for an upgrade on 2/13/25. [name of company] is a licensed professional HVAC company. [name of company] is the company under contract to complete the current repairs. The repair timeline is dependent on parts availability, it could be 3-4 weeks. The facility is planning on upgrading to PTAC units starting in Spring. 5. Space heaters provided to all residents who agreed to have it, completed 2/19/25. Space Heaters are monitored during room temperature checks or rounds by Nursing Staff/ Maintenance. Maintenance Director is responsible for the oversight of the space heaters. The list of Heaters: Magnavox gDual Quartz Fan Radiant Heater Model No. QGW15-607 SKU#:127473 Adjustable Thermostat Two settings: High {1500 [NAME]} Low (750 [NAME]} Top Mounted Control Panel Power indicator Light Safety Overheat protection. Safety Tip-over Protection Convenient Stay cool carry handle Quiet high efficiency fan assisted. 120V A.C. 60Hz 12.SA, 5120 BTUs [NAME] Digital Ceramic Tower Heater Model #CC23645 Top Mounted Control Panel Power indicator Light Safety Overheat protection. Safety Tip-over Protection [NAME] Revolution II Full room Heater Model # CT32791 Power indicator Light Safety Overheat protection. Safety Tip-over Protection Utilitech Fan-Forced heater Model BNS 15-JW 120VAC 60 Hz 1500W Power indicator Light Safety Overheat protection. Safety Tip-over Protection Maintenance monitors for tipping hazards, positioning of the heater that it is not to close to the bed or other furniture; check for cracked or damaged cords and plugs, condition of the unit; The heaters are plugged into the outlet; heater placed securely away from bed or other furniture; extension cords not in use. 6. Commercial grade heaters have been located and are being placed on hallways to maintain temperatures per regulation. Upon completion of HVAC contractors, heaters will be removed. While heaters are in place, ongoing monitoring of temps and safety will be completed by walking rounds by Maintenance personnel or trained designee. 7. Room temperatures will be audited every 2 hours by CNAs/ Maintenance. The Maintenance Director will be notified when temperatures are below 71. The Executive Director will be notified if room temperatures are below 65 and remain below 65 for one hour. Completion every 2 hours are until the temperatures are maintained >71, then, every shift during the inclement weather. If a room is less than 71F, Maintenance is to be notified; room temperature will be rechecked; nursing will offer the resident warm blankets and warm beverages; resident vital signs are being monitored at least twice per shift and the Charge Nurse will assess for change of condition as needed. 8. All residents who prefer a cooler room temperature will be identified and their care plans updated by 2/20/25. Residents are allowed to have cooler rooms within reason/based on their wishes/ resident rights. The Nursing staff will monitor the residents vital signs twice per shift and Charge Nurses will assess as indicated. Resident preference will be identified in the care profile. 9. Residents will be offered warm blankets; warm beverages to prevent hypothermia. Nursing staff are monitoring resident during rounds and vital signs; Charge Nurses will assess as indicated. 10. Windows were checked for air leaks by Maintenance Director on 2/19/25. 11. Portable AC Units were removed 2/19/25 and windows sealed by Maintenance Director. (Unless resident declined the removal) The windows was closed which sealed itself, no other sealant was used. No resident was at a safety risk
Aug 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pressure Ulcer Prevention (Tag F0686)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** [NAME], Kymyaka Based on record review and interview the facility staff failed to ensure residents with pressure ulcers received...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** [NAME], Kymyaka Based on record review and interview the facility staff failed to ensure residents with pressure ulcers received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive care plan, and the residents' choices to promote healing, prevent infection, and prevent new ulcers from developing for 1 of 6 residents (CR#1) reviewed for wound care. -The facility failed to obtain wound care orders for CR#1's sacral wound upon admission from 06/11/2024-06/17/2024, and failed to document that the orders were implemented once obtained from 06/17/2024-06/20/2024. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving adequate care in a timely manner, deterioration of skin, and decreased quality of life. Findings included: Record review of CR#1's Face Sheet dated 6/21/2024 revealed, an [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of fracture of upper end of left humerus (upper arm fracture). CR#1 discharged to a local hospital on [DATE], after a fall. Record review of CR#1's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed in section C a BIMS score of 11 indicating she was moderately impaired cognitively. She was assessed to have unhealed pressure Ulcers/Injuries in Section M. Record review of a progress note completed by LVN A and dated 06/11/2024 revealed that resident (CR#1) admitted with an open area on right buttock. Record review of CR#1's discharge medical records dated 06/11/2024 from a local hospital revealed no discharge diagnosis or orders for wound care. Record review of the Initial admission Record initiated on 06/11/2024 by LVN A revealed that CR#1 admitted with an open area to the right buttock in the section for skin integrity, and CR#1 admitted with no infection in the section for infection. Further review revealed that the document was updated by ADON B on 06/17/2024 that read in part, Resident (CR#1) admitted with open area stage 3 right buttocks area. Treatment initiated as ordered. Record review of CR#1's undated Care Plan revealed: Focus: Has pressure ulcer to Right buttocks r/t Disease process. stage 3. Revision on: 06/17/2024 Goal: Pressure ulcer will show signs of healing and remain free from infection by/through review date. Target Date: 09/12/2024 Intervention: Administer treatments as ordered and monitor for effectiveness. Record review of physician orders read in part, right buttocks: open area cleansed with normal saline, pat dry apply CA alginate (Calcium alginate), cover with dry dressing daily, starting on 06/17/2024 and entered by ADON B on 06/17/2024. Record review of undated TAR for CR#1 revealed no documentation from 06/17/2024-06/20/2024 to indicate that wound care orders were completed. Record review of skin assessment with effective date 6/18/2024 for CR#1 read in part, left buttock pressure length 3.0, width 2.5, and depth 0.2. Additional comments: Noted a wound with red granular tissue(a type of new connective tissue that forms in a wound during the healing process), middle of wound bed noted with tan tissue, edges flat, dry no drainage noted, tender to touch, noted multiple old bruises from hospital needle sticks to right wrist/forearm area. Skin barrier applied after each brief change and BID. Record review of progress note dated 06/20/2024 by Physician C revealed CR#1 was assessed to have pressure ulcer to the left buttock with onset date 06/11/2024 with Length: (cm) 3 Width: (cm): 2 and depth (cm) 0.2. 100% reticular dermis(the thick, bottom layer of the dermis, which is the inner layer of the skin) with bleeding, very superficial wound. There were no new orders provided. There was no documentation for concern with infection. Record review of CR#1's medical records dated 06/20/2024 from a local hospital revealed that CR#1 arrived via emergency services on 06/20/2024 with a chief complaint of fall, sepsis screening 0, and wound assessment revealed stage 3 pressure injury to left buttocks and sacrum that was dry, clean, and intact with slough (a soft, yellow, white, stringy, or thick substance that can appear on a wound's surface). In a phone interview on 06/21/2024 at 10:36am with RP, she said that CR#1 rolled out of bed and fell on the butt where her pressure ulcer was located on 06/20/2024, and she had not been told that there was a concern for infection. She said that she was at the bedside when the resident fell, and she requested that CR#1 be transferred to the hospital. She said that facility staff told her that CR#1 admitted with a pressure ulcer, but she did not believe it to be true. In an effort on 06/21/2024 at 12:24pm to interview CR#1, at a local hospital she was unavailable. In an interview on 06/21/2024 at 12:24pm with a RN at a local hospital, she said that CR#1 was having a round of testing, and it was unknow what time she would return to the room. She said that CR#1 arrived on 06/20/2024 by EMS from the facility after a fall on the buttock, and CR#1 had pressure ulcer on the sacrum. She said that there was no notation that infection was a concern. She said that CR#1 had a pressure ulcer to the sacrum at discharge from last hospital stay. In a phone interview on 08/13/2024 at 3:02 p.m. with LVN A, who started at the facility in July of 2023. She said that the duty of the admitting nurse is to complete a head to toe skin assessment at the time of admission. She said that if a pressure ulcer is identified during the skin assessment the wound should be documented, contact is made with the physician to continue hospital discharge orders to treat the wound if provided, or obtain orders to treat the wound if there are no hospital discharge orders provided. She said that if the wound care nurse was in the building at the time of admission, the wound care nurse would complete a second assessment and implement the wound care orders. She said that clinical nurses from the corporate office review new admissions to make sure they are done correctly on the next working day. She said that she was the admitting nurse for CR#1 who admitted to the facility with a sacral wound from the hospital, and she could not remember if she had discharge orders to treat the wound. She said that she communicated the presence of the wound to the ADON who was also the wound care nurse at the time. She said that the ADON was to complete a second skin assessment, obtain treatment orders from the physician, and implement the treatment orders. She said that the ADON did not complete the second assessment, obtain orders, or implement orders. She was unsure how long CR#1 went without orders to treat the wound. She said that the risk to the resident was wound infection. In an interview on 08/13/2024 at 4:13pm with ADON E, she said that she started in July of 2019 as a floor nurse and promoted to ADON in November of 2023. She said that ADON B transferred to the facility in April of 2024 as an ADON and wound care nurse. She said that ADON B was responsible for all wound care until the current DON started. She said that the admitting nurse should complete a skin assessment, ensure that orders are obtained at admission for any skin issues identified, and implement the orders. She said that ADON B should complete a second skin assessment the next business day to ensure the accuracy of the admission skin assessment, and correct errors immediately. She said that an audit of all new admissions should be completed on the next business day during the morning meeting with IDT members present to ensure the admission was completed with accuracy, and with any errors corrected immediately. She said the IDT consists of ED, DON, ADONs, Social Worker, and MDS Nurse. She said that she reviewed the EMR for CR#1 who admitted on [DATE]. She said that LVN A did not obtain orders to treat a wound identified at admission. She said that ADON B did not complete the second skin assessment until 06/17/2024. She said that she did not work on 06/12/2024, the IDT should have audited the admission, and it would have revealed that CR#1 did not have orders to treat the wound. She said without orders, there was a delay in treatment, and the delay could have caused the wound to deteriorate. In an interview on 08/13/2024 at 4:51 p.m. with ADON B, she said that she started at the facility in 2019, and she became an ADON in November of 2023. She said that the facility did not have a wound care nurse until August of 2024, and prior to the position being filled the floor nurses completed wound care, and she was the oversight. She said that she completed weekly skin assessments and rounded with wound care doctor weekly. She said that the admitting nurse should complete a head to toe skin assessment at the time of admission, ensure the resident has treatment orders at the time of admission, and implement the orders. She said that she was to complete a second skin assessment on the next business day to ensure the accuracy of the admitting nurse's skin assessment, ensure that orders were in place to treat any skin issues, and that the orders had been implemented. She said that an audit of all new admission is to be completed on the next business day during the morning meeting with IDT members present to ensure the admission was completed with accuracy, and with any errors corrected immediately. She said the IDT consists of ED, DON, ADONs, Social Worker, and MDS Nurse. She said that the audit is to prevent a delay in treatment. She said that CR#1 admitted on [DATE] with a pressure ulcer, and the admitting nurse(LVN A) did not ensure that orders were in place to treat the wound. She said that she worked on 06/12/2024, she did not complete a skin assessment on the next business day, she did not know why, and it was an oversight. She said that she completed the assessment on 06/17/2024, and she saw that the admitting nurse did not get treatment orders. She said that she contacted the physician to get orders to treat, she implemented the orders that same day, and each day until discharge. She said that she reviewed the TAR from 06/17/24-06/20/2024 and there was no documentation that CR#1 received wound care. She said that if something is not documented it did not happen. She said that the IDT members did not meet to review the admission of CR#1, and she did not know why. She said that if she had completed the assessment and the audit was completed on 06/12/2024 by IDT members the error should have been caught and corrected. She said that there was a delay in treatment, and the risk could have been wound deterioration. She said that CR#1 did not have an infection and she was assessed by Physician C on 06/20/24 with no concern for the wound. In an interview on 08/14/2024 at 11:16 a.m. with Physician D, he said that he was the primary physician for CR#1 and the facility's medical director. He said that he could not remember CR#1, but if a resident admitted with wounds, he should have received the information when contacted to reconcile medications at the time of the admission. He said that he would have provided a temporary order to treat the wounds on 06/11/2024 with a wound consult. He said that orders should have been in place at the time of admission on [DATE], and if orders were not obtained until 06/17/2024 he would have a concern that treatment was delayed, and the delay could cause the wound to worsen. He said that once an order is obtained it should be documented, and if there was no documentation of wound care from 06/17/2024-06/20/2024 he would be concerned. He said that there is a standard that if something is not documented it did not happen. In an interview on 08/14/2024 at 11:37 a.m. with Physician C, he said that he is the wound care doctor for the facility. He said that the facility should have orders in place for wound care at the time a resident was admitted if they were to admit with the wound. He said that he would complete an initial evaluation on his next rounding day after the admission. He said that if a resident admitted on [DATE] with no orders in place until 06/17/2024 it would cause him to have a concern for delayed treatment. He said that all treatment should be documented, and there is standard that if something is not documented it did not happen. He said that he assessed CR#1 on 06/20/2024 he did not have a concern for the wound or concern for infection. In an interview on 08/14/2024 at 1:59p.m. with the Interim DON, she said that she is employed by the corporate office as a Clinical Resource, and she was assigned as the DON from 05/28/2024-06/10/2024. She said that while she was at the facility ADON B completed all wound care, weekly skin assessments, and rounded with the wound care doctor. She said that ADON F would assist ADON B with the wound care. She said that the admitting nurse should complete a skin assessment, and ensure treatment orders were in place at the time of admission if a resident admitted with wounds. She said that ADON B should complete a second skin assessment within 24 hours to ensure the accuracy of the admission skin assessment. She said that the IDT members should meet the next business day after the admission to ensure the accuracy of all new admissions with any errors corrected immediately to prevent a delay in treatment. She said that if a resident did not have treatment orders for a wound until 06/17/2024 after a 06/11/2024 admission, she would be concerned. She said it would be a delay in treatment that could cause the wound to worsen. She said that all treatments should be documented on the TAR and if it is not documented it did not happen. In an interview on 08/14/2024 at 2:46pm with the DON, she said that she started at the facility on 07/01/2024. She said that when she took the position, the floor nurses were completing wound care with ADON B as the oversight. She said that the admitting nurse should complete a skin assessment at the time of admission, ensure there are orders to treat any identified skin issue at the time of admission, and implement the orders. She said that the wound care nurse should complete a second skin assessment within 24 hours of admission to ensure the accuracy of the initial skin assessment and that orders have been put in place and implemented. She said that an audit of all new admissions should be completed by the next business day after admission to ensure the accuracy of the admission with errors corrected immediately. She said that the audit is completed at the clinical meeting with the ED, DON, ADONs, and MDS nurse. She said that from her review CR#1 admitted with a wound, LVN A did not obtain orders to treat at the time of admission, ADON B did not complete a skin assessment within 24 hours, and the clinical morning meeting did not audit the new admission. She said that delay in treatments could cause a risk of a wound to worsen. She said that CR#1 was assessed on 06/20/2024 and the wound appeared to be getting better and was superficial, even though it was not on the TAR. She said that all treatments should be documented on the TAR, and if treatments are not documented it did not happen. Interview on 08/14/2024 at 3:35pm. the ED said that audits should be completed of a new admission the next working day after admission at the morning meeting with all the department heads present to ensure admission was completed accurately, ensure orders are in place, and to prevent delays in treatment. She said that any error found during the audit would be corrected immediately. She said that the DON has clinical oversight for the audit, and she is the oversight for the DON. She said that CR#1 admitted on [DATE], and she could not remember if there was an audit of the admission on [DATE], but the audit should have caught that orders were not in place for wound care. She said that the orders should have been in place from 06/11/2024. She said that a risk to a resident if their treatment is delayed is the wound could worsen. She said that CR#1 did not have harm because the doctor described the wound as superficial on 06/20/2024. She said that all treatments should be documented on the TAR and if it is not documented it did not happen. Record review of facility policy, Skin and Wound Monitoring and Management dated December 2023 read in part, It is the policy of this facility that: 2. A resident having pressure injury(s) receives necessary treatment and services to promote healing, prevent infection, and prevent new, avoidable pressure injuries from developing . Procedure i. Once an area of alteration in skin integrity has been identified, assessed, and documented, nursing shall administer treatment to each affected area as per the Physician's Order. j. Treatments per physician order, should be documented in the resident's clinical record at the time they are administered .9.Quality Assessment and Assurance a. The Quality Assurance Committee should, among other things, evaluate strategies to reduce the development and progression of pressure ulcers as well as monitoring the incidence and prevalence of skin breakdown in the facility .
Jan 2024 5 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan that...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and time frames to meet a resident's medical and nursing needs to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 8 residents, Resident #8, reviewed for care plans in that: -Resident #8's code status (full code) was not care planned. This failure could place residents in the facility at risk of not being provided with the necessary care or services and having personalized plans developed to address their specific needs. The findings: Record review of Resident #8's Face Sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old female, with an original admission date of 12/26/2023. Diagnoses included COPD (chronic obstruction, pulmonary disease), Dementia (Decline in cognitive abilities that impacts a person's ability to perform everyday activities), bipolar disorder (periods of depression and periods of abnormally elevated mood), Anxiety (An unpleasant state of inner turmoil and includes feelings of dread over anticipated events) Depression (Mental state of low mood), and PTSD (post-traumatic stress disorder). Record review of Resident #8's MDS dated [DATE] reflected a BIMS score of 15 (Cognition Intact). Record review of Resident #8's physician orders dated 12/26/2023 reflected full code. Record review of Resident #8's care plan dated 12/26/2023 reflected no code status on 1/9/2024 when reviewed. Interview on 01/12/24 at 10:45 AM with the DON stated the MDS coordinator handles all care plans after initial care plan had been completed by nurses. The DON stated Resident #8's code status should be updated and reflected in the care plan and to follow Resident #8's wishes. The DON stated possible negative outcomes for Resident #8 could lead to not implementing the correct code status if an emergency with Resident #8 occurred. Interview on 01/12/24 at 01:32 PM with the MDS Resource stated initial care plans were done by nurses and unsure which nurse completed the initial care plan and why Resident #8's code status was missed. The MDS Resource stated she was going through recent resident admission records that needed to be updated or incomplete and saw that Resident # 8's code status was not updated and corrected the care plan on 1/11/2024. The MDS Resource stated she did not have an answer on why it was missed and stated that there would be no negative outcome for Resident #8 since the code status was in physician orders and on Resident #8's main chart. The MDS Resource stated nurses know where to look in the computer system for code status if needed. Record review of the Care Plans Policy dated 10/2010 stated; An individualized comprehensive care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the residents. Medical, nursing, mental and psychological needs is developed for each resident. 7. The resident's comprehensive care plan is developed within seven days of the completion of the Residence Comprehensive Assessment MDS.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pharmacy Services (Tag F0755)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, record review the facility failed to establish a system of records, receipts, and disposition o...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, record review the facility failed to establish a system of records, receipts, and disposition of all controlled drugs in sufficient detail to enable accurate reconciliation and account for all controlled drugs for one resident (Resident #99) reviewed for disposition of drugs in a sample of 8 residents. It was determined the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services that ensure the accurate administering of drugs for 1 of 2 medication rooms observed for medications stored and properly labeled. One of the medication rooms had 2 glucagon pens, used for injection, that were expired. A medication, Tramadol, did not have a narcotic record amount that matched the quantity on hand. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving medications because of drug diversions or receiving medications that were expired and therefore not producing the desired effect or leading to infection. Findings include: During a record review of the pharmacy destruction records on [DATE] at 10:30 AM for medications being held for destruction, the Narcotic Record of Resident #99's Tramadol indicated 26 pills and Resident #99's medication card had 25 pills. During an interview on [DATE] at 10:30 AM, when asked the facility's process to destroy medications, the DON said medications that were to be destroyed were kept in the DON's office in a cabinet. The DN said the office door is locked, and the cabinet is locked. This process was in place at the time of the missing medication and remained the process at the time of survey. The DON said sign out sheets, which document how much Tramadol the resident received, when, and by whom and how much Tramadol is left to be destroyed, are secured to the drug with a rubber band. The sign out sheets are signed by the nursing staff bringing the medication to the DON's office for storage until disposal and document how much medication is left for destruction. The DON stated there was no other documentation other than the sign out sheets to indicate what medications are to be destroyed. The DON said she did not know why the medication card did not match the reconciliation sheet. During an interview on [DATE] at 10:15 AM with the DON, she said she did not report the missing Tramadol. The DON said a discrepancy between the card and the reconciliation sheet could indicate a drug diversion. The DON said a possible cause of drug diversion needed to be investigated. The DON said she did not know if drug was given, destroyed (wasted) or diverted. The DON said she did not call the police. During an observation of 1 of 2 medication rooms on [DATE] at 10:00 AM (2) glucagon single dose injectors were found to be expired March of 2023. During an interview on [DATE] at 10:30 AM the DON said the efficacy of an injectable drug may be insufficient if a medication is expired. The use of an expired injectable medication could lead to infection. Record review of the storage of medications policy/procedures (MED-PASS Revised [DATE]) read the facility shall not use discontinued, outdated or deteriorated drugs or biologicals. All such drugs shall be returned to the dispensing pharmacy or destroyed. Record review of the Drug Diversion, Reporting and Response policy and procedure (Nursing Services Policy and Procedures Revised [DATE]) read, Employees are required to report known or suspected incidents of drug diversion by employees, patients/residents, and visitors. At each shift change, a physical inventory of all controlled medications is conducted by licensed nurses and is documented on the controlled substance accountability record. Any discrepancy is controlled substance medication counts is reported to the director of nursing immediately.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that drugs and biologicals used in the facility were secured properly for one of one wound care carts (Hall 100 nurse m...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that drugs and biologicals used in the facility were secured properly for one of one wound care carts (Hall 100 nurse medication cart) reviewed for drug storage in that: -Wound Care cart on Hall 100 was left unlocked and unattended. LVN E left medications unsupervised that were assessable to residents. This failure could place residents who reside on Hall 100 who receive treatment from the wound care cart at risk for harm to unauthorized people and place the facility at risk for possible drug diversion. Findings include: Observation on 01/11/24 at 09:22 AM revealed the 100-hall wound care cart unlocked and unattended. Wound Care nurse noted to be in a resident's room getting left over supplies after performing wound care. There were no residents in the hallway however, there was one nurse (RN A) about 5 feet from the wound care cart but was unaware the wound care cart was unlocked and did not know where the wound care nurse was as RN A has just finished assisting a resident in their room. This surveyor was able to open multiple drawers and pull out a variety of medications and supplies from the wound care cart. During an observation of a medication pass on 1/10/24 at 10:20 AM, LVN E left a medication unattended on top of a medication cart and walked away for approximately 5 minutes. Interview on 01/11/24 at 9:27 AM the wound care nurse stated she normally does not leave the wound care cart unlocked but got distracted when she went into a resident's room nearby (door closed) to get left over supplies and forgot to lock the wound care cart. The wound care nurse stated it was important to lock the wound care cart because anybody who was unauthorized could come along and take supplies or medication from the wound care cart. The wound care nurse stated last in-service on locking medication/wound care carts was about 14 days ago. Interview on 01/11/24 at 11:48 AM the DON stated all medication and wound care carts should be locked at all times to prevent unauthorized people from having access to the wound care cart medication and supplies. The DON stated that last in-service on locked medication/wound care carts was about two weeks ago and charge nurses as well as Administration are responsible for making sure medication/wound care carts are locked at all times. During an interview with LVN E on 1/10/24 at 10:30 AM she said she should not have left a medication out on top of the medication cart unsupervised. She said she was nervous. She said any resident could have picked it up. During an interview with the DON on 1/10/24 at 1:00 PM she said she knew that the nurses were not supposed to leave medications out of the medication cart unattended. The DON said there was a risk that anyone could come by and take the medication. The DON said LVN E had training yearly with skills check off and had monthly in-services. The DON said LVN E was up to date with her training. The DON said she supervised the training and went around with the nurses once a month and checked the carts and medication delivery. Record review of Storage of Medications Policy dated 4/2007 stated; 7. Compartments (including, but not limited to, drawers, cabinets, rooms, refrigerators, carts, and boxes.) containing drugs and biologicals shall be locked when not in use and trays or carts used to transport such items shall not be left unattended, if open or otherwise potentially available to others. Record review of the Charge Nurse Skills Checklist-skilled Nursing form completed by LVN E and signed by DON dated 11/8/23 indicated satisfactory performance of oral medication administration. Record review of the Relias training transcript indicated course completion by LVN E of Medication Basics for Long Term Care Professionals dated 12/9/23. Record review of the Med-Pass Storage of Medications policy and procedures (revised April 2007) The facility shall store all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly manner.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0679 (Tag F0679)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide, based on the comprehensive assessment and...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide, based on the comprehensive assessment and care plan and the preferences of each resident, an ongoing program to support residents in their choice of activities for 3 of 3 residents (Resident #37, #14, #16) reviewed for activities. The facility failed to provide Residents #37, #16 and' #14 with activities designed to meet their interests and promote physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. This failure could affect residents at the facility who require assistance to activities to decline in mental acuity due to lack of stimulation, boredom, and depression. The findings included: Record review of Resident #37s face sheet accessed 1/12/24 indicated she was an 86 y/o female, admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis dated 1/3/24 for failure to thrive and CVA right hemiparesis. Record review of Resident #37s MDS dated [DATE] indicated she had a BIMS score of 15 which indicated intact cognition. Observation of Resident #37 on 1/10/24 at 10:53 AM revealed her lying in bed with a wheelchair within reach. Two of her family members were present in the room visiting with her. During an interview with Resident #37 on 1/10/24 at 10:53 AM she said she was not aware of any activities offered at the facility. When asked what she did for fun she said, not a damn thing. In an interview on 1/10/24 at 10:53 AM a Family Member said he would have liked the facility to provide activities to Resident #37 but was unaware any were available. Record review of Resident #16's face sheet indicated he was an [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of a fractured leg. Record review of Resident # 16's MDS dated [DATE] indicated he had a BIMS score of 15, which indicated intact cognition. During an interview with Resident #16 on 1/12/24 at 11:01 AM he said that usually, he just sits around in the hallways or in the dining room or watches TV in his room. Resident #16 said when you get admitted here, they make it seem like it's going to be busy all the time and there's always going to be stuff to do but there is never anything to do. There is no bingo. There are no games. Resident #16 said no one asked him if he wanted to do activities, and the only people that come to his room were there to give medication or food. Record review of Resident #14s face sheet indicated she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted [DATE] with a diagnosis of acute respiratory failure. Record review of Resident #14's MDS dated [DATE] indicated she had a BIMS score of 15, which indicated intact cognition. During an interview with Resident # 14 on 1/12/2024 at 11:12 AM she said she did not do anything for fun. Resident #14 said nothing that was on the activity calendar was what they did every day. She said she would like to partake in a reading club, or bingo. During an interview with the administrator on 1/10/24 at 2:00 PM, she said she did not have an activity director. She said the facility had not had an activity director since they opened on November 1st, 2023. She said she hired an activity assistant that worked full time and she left soon after Christmas. The administrator said she expected a new activity director to begin working the following week. The administrator said the administrator in training has helped once per week. The physical therapy has been helping once or twice per week with group activities. She said most of the Medicare patients that were not bedridden were taken out. Most of the Medicare patient were given TVs and that was the main source of activity for patients that don't leave their room. During an interview with the DON on 1/12/2024 at 10:15 she said people suffer loneliness if they have no activities and that it was an issue for nurses. The DON said the residents could start having attention seeking behavior and it could create some mental health issues. Record review of facility's assessment tool dated November 2023 indicated: Part 1: Considerations made for determining staffing besides the clinical picture of the patient includes, but is not limited to, resident preferences with regards to daily schedules, waking, napping, bedtimes, bathing and activities. Part 2: Services and Care We Offer Based on our Residents' Needs. 2.1 The general types of care that our resident population requires and that we provide, and additional considerations relative to the provision of that care, include the following: Provide opportunities for social activities/life enrichment (individual, small group, community) Record review of the facility Resident admission Agreement indicates: As a resident of this nursing facility, you have the right to self-determination through support of your choice, including the right to choose activities, interact with members of the community and participate in community activities inside the facility.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 facili...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for food storage sanitation in that: The facility failed to store raw meat properly in the refrigerator. This failure could place residents at risk for cross-contamination and food-borne illnesses. This failure could place all residents who received meals at the facility at risk for food borne illness. Findings included: Observation on 01/09/2024 at 10:22 am, the Investigator entered the walk-in cooler where the raw meat was located. A package of raw meat rested on the bottom shelf with a puddle of blood on the floor directly beneath the sealed package of meat. Interview on 01/09/24 at 10:22am, the Investigator asked the Dietary Manager how long the blood had been there, and Dietary Manager responded, To be honest, that has been there for three days. When the investigator asked the Dietary Manager what the risks and harms were to having blood on the floor in a walk-in cooler, the Dietary Manager stated that others can slip and fall from the puddle on the floor, other food items could become contaminated, and that bacteria could be harmful to the dietary staff and the residents. The Dietary Manager stated that all staff in the kitchen are responsible to maintain cleanliness and cleaning the kitchen. All Dietary staff is responsible for overseeing the cleanliness of their work area. The cleanliness of the kitchen is monitored with the kitchen logs they use during their shifts. The Dietary Manager stated that he is responsible for doing a walk through. Dietary manager stated that meat should be stored by being properly sealed. Observation and interview on 1/11/24 at 9:04am, revealed personal drinks, a Ziplock bag of snacks, and a personal cell phone on the preparation board where the Dietary Staff was preparing vegetables for the upcoming lunch. The Investigator asked the Dietary Staff and the Dietary Manager who the personal bundle of items belonged to; the Dietary Staff took ownership of the items. Both the Dietary Staff and the Dietary Manager stated that the personal items should not be located at the same area. Record review of the facility's policy on, Personal Items in Kitchen, dated October 2017, revealed: -It is the policy of this facility that any food or personal items that are brought to the kitchen by staff must be directed to an area that does not come into contact with the food and the area that is preparing food for the residents. -Procedures: .2. Staff need to be aware that if personal items are being placed in areas of the kitchen that are used for handling the food that is prepared for the residents it is not sanitary and could result in sickness. The facility's Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form, dated 09/25/22, revealed 55 residents received meals at the facility. Record review of the facility's policy Food Receiving & Storage Policy Statement revealed, All food, chemicals, and supplies should be received and stored in a manner that ensures quality and maximizes safety of the food served. Facility's Foods Brought by Family/Visitors policy dated July 2023 reflected: Policy Interpretation & Implementation Nursing home residents risk serious complications from foodborne illness as a result of their compromised health status. Unsafe food handling practices represent a potential source of pathogen exposure for residents. Sanitary conditions must be present in health care food service settings to promote safe food handling. CMS recognizes the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) Food Code and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) food safety guidance as national standards to procure, store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in long term care facilities in a safe and sanitary manner. Contaminated Equipment - Equipment can become contaminated in various ways including, but not limited to: o Poor personal hygiene; o Improper sanitation; and o Contact with raw food (e.g., poultry, eggs, seafood, and meat).
Jul 2023 1 deficiency
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 2 of 5 residents (CR #1 and Resident #1) reviewed for supervision. - CNA A failed to provide adequate supervision for CR #1 by leaving the resident on the toilet alone and going to break. - The facility failed to provide adequate supervision to Resident #2 by leaving the resident on the toilet alone making the resident feel unsafe. These failures could place residents at risk for falls and injury. Finding included: CR #1 Record review of CR #1's Face Sheet dated 07/17/23 revealed, a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: type 2 diabetes, muscle weakness, need for assistance with personal care, unsteadiness on feed, other reduced mobility and aftercare following explanation of knee joint prosthesis. CR #1 discharged from the facility on 03/03/23. Record review of CR #1's MDS dated [DATE] revealed, intact condition as indicated by a BIMS score of 13 out of 15, use of a wheelchair, limited assistance with most ADLs (transfer, toilet use and personal hygiene) and not steady, only able to stabilize with staff assistance for moving on and off the toilet as well as surface-to-surface transfer. Toileting hygiene and transfer required partial/moderate assistance at admission. Record review of CR#1's Interim Care Plan dated 02/16/23 revealed, no related focus areas, goals or interventions. Record review of CR #1's OT Evaluation & Plan of Treatment signed 02/23/23 revealed, sitting balance- fair (minimal weight shifting to same side of body/front, difficulty crossing midline). Functional Skills Assessment: toileting- total, toilet/commode transfers minimal. Impression- pt displays decreased strength, endurance, balance, transfers, toilet transfers, toileting ADL performance and safety awareness. Skilled justification- CR #1 would benefit from continued OT services for strengthening, endurance training, toilet transfer training, toileting, ADL retraining and safety awareness training. Focus of POT- restoration. Record review of CR #1's undated MDS Report printed 07/17/23 revealed, CR #1 was not steady during transitions/walking and needed one-person physical assist with toilet use. Record review of a witness statement dated 03/13/23 and signed by LVN B revealed, CNA A notified her that CR #1 was on the toilet, and she would be going on break on an unspecified date. She said when CNA A was on break she heard the call light and assisted the patient with toileting hygiene and helped him back in bed. She wrote I do not recall the exact date of the event or exactly how long the call light was going off but she didn't feel I was very long. She wrote It had only been around 10-12 minutes since aide (CNA A) told me she would be leaving for break. She wrote she did not remember the patient being upset about a long wait. Resident #2 Record review of Resident #2's Face Sheet dated 07/17/23 revealed, a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with spinal stenosis (pressure on the spinal cord and nerves as a result of the space inside the backbone being too small), muscle weakness and Sciatica (pain, weakness, numbness, or tingling in the leg) Record review of Resident #2's undated Care Plan revealed, focus- risk of falls related to impaired balance. Record review of Resident #2's MDS dated [DATE] revealed, intact cognition as indicated by a BIMS score of 13 out of 15 and limited assistance with all ADLs. Record review of Resident #2's OT Evaluation & Plan of Treatment signed 06/23/23 revealed, Sitting balance- sitting during ALDS=fair - (reach to same side of the body and unable to weight shift). Functional Skills Assessment- toileting minimal and commode transfers- moderate. Impression- Pt displayed decreased strength, endurance, balance, transfers, toilet transfers, toileting. Skilled Justification- Resident #2 would benefit from continued skilled OT services for strengthening, endurance, training, toilet transfer training, toileting, ADL retraining and safety awareness training. Focus of POT=restoration. Record review of Resident #2's Progress Notes dated 06/25/23 at 12:34 AM revealed, Resident #2 was found sitting in on the floor in front of her wheelchair. Resident #2 stated she was trying to get in her chair to go to the bathroom. An observation and interview on 07/17/23 at 09:45 AM revealed, Resident #2 sitting in her wheelchair folding clothes by her dresser. She said that she didn't feel safe in the facility because the staff leave her in the restroom, unattended, for prolonged periods in time. Resident #2 said on multiple occasions the staff have transferred her to the restroom and told her to pull the call light and when she does pull the call light it takes them over 10 to come in so they clearly left the room. Resident #2 said the long wait forces her to transfer herself off the toilet and since she had a fall recently it made her feel really unsafe. In an interview on 07/17/23 at 10:10 AM, LVN B said nursing staff are expected to not leave the resident room once they have been assisted to the restroom. She said some resident's require extensive assistance due to poor balance requiring staff to be inside the bathroom with them, while with others who had better balance/cognition staff could stay outside of the bathroom door. LVN B said nursing staff cannot leave a resident on the toilet unattended and leave the room because leaving resident's unsupervised places them at risk for falls. In an interview on 07/17/23 at 12:12 PM, CNA A said that on an unspecified date she helped CR #1 to the restroom because he had to have a bowel movement. She said she checked on the resident a few times but he was still using the restroom and it was time for her break, so she left the resident in the bathroom with the door closed, notified an unnamed nurse that the resident was in the restroom and he would pull the call light when he was done. CNA A said some residents can be left on the toilet unsupervised depending on the assessment by PT while others required supervision at all times. CNA A said if a resident cannot self-transfer from the toilet then staff must stay in the room right outside the door for safety reasons, but CR #1 was able to transfer himself to and from the toilet. She said multiple occasions when she placed CR#1 on the toilet by the time she returned to the room he had transferred himself and was already in his room. In an interview on 07/17/23 at 12:42 PM, the PT Director said at the time of the incident CR #1's sitting balance during ADLs was fair and her interpretation of fair was that the resident could sit on the toilet but he shouldn't be left alone because it was fair it wasn't good. She said based on the documentation on CR #1's chart he was not safe to be left alone on the toilet unattended. The PT director said on 06/23/23 Resident #2 was assessed as requiring moderate assistance with commode transfers but on 06/29/23 she was assed as moderate assistance with transfer and ass time passed (07/03/23, 07/04/23) she would not transfer due to back and knee pain. She said after Resident #2 had a fall she complained of knee pain that was limiting and Resident #2 was assessed as requiring total assistance with toileting staring 07/04/23. The PT director said based on this change in Resident #2 she should not be left unattended. In an interview on 07/17/23 at 01:10 PM, the Administrator said nursing staff are expected to stay within the vicinity of the resident room to ensure the safety of the resident. In an interview on 07/17/23 at 03:00 PM, the Administrator said the facility did not have a policy addressing supervision and quality of care. Record review of facility policy titled Supporting Activities of Daily Living (ADL) revised 03/2018 revealed, 2- appropriate care and services should be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADLs independently, with the consent of the resident and/or resident representative and in accordance with the plan of care, including appropriate support and assistance with: c- elimination(toileting).
Dec 2022 4 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

MDS Data Transmission (Tag F0640)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete and transmit/export a resident assessment within the requi...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete and transmit/export a resident assessment within the required time frame for 1 of 48 residents (CR#1) reviewed for completion and transmission/export in that: -- CR #1's did not have a Discharge MDS completed within the required timeframe. -- CR#1 did not have a Discharge MDS transmitted/exported within the required timeframe. These failures could place residents at risk of not having their assessments transmitted/exported timely. Findings Include: Record review of CR #1's admission record dated *revealed he was a 55- year- old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 07/26/2022. His diagnoses included pneumonia due to methicillin susceptible staphylococcus aureus (an infection caused by methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus that inflames air sacs in one or both lungs, which may fill with fluid. MRSA is a common causative organism in hospital acquired or health care associated infections), acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (sudden inability of the respiratory system to meet the oxygenation needs of the body), COVID-19 (corona virus of 2019), anemia in chronic kidney disease (a condition of too little iron in the body which results in blood lacking adequate healthy red blood cells), lymphedema (swelling in an arm or leg caused by a lymphatic system blockage), and essential hypertension (high blood pressure not caused by secondary causes or medical conditions). Record review of CR #1's EMR revealed the resident had a discharge assessment return not anticipated MDS dated [DATE] which was the last MDS listed for CR #1. Further review of the MDS assessment tab revealed: Discharge Return Not Anticipated/End of PPS Part A Stay M D S 3.0 Export Ready. Record review of CR #1's of Discharge Return Not Anticipated/End of PPS Part A Stay, completed on 11/30/2022 at 2:11 pm, revealed the following entry under the Complete MDS heading, Complete MDS: Completed 10/21/2022,' with the date highlighted in red. Under the heading, Lock By; Submit by Date: 11/4/2022, with the date highlighted in red. Record review of CR #1's EMR census and billing listing lines, on 11/3022 at 2:09 pm, revealed the following entry: 7/26/2022 .Stop billing. Interview with LVN MDS H on 11/30/22 at 2:12pm, she said that she did not know why CR #1's discharge assessment had not been exported. When asked what the message Export Ready under CR #1's discharge MDS heading meant, she said it meant that the MDS had not been exported or transmitted to CMS and she did not know why since CR #1 discharged back in July of 2022. LVN MDS H said that it should have been exported or transmitted by now. When asked why the Complete MDS and Lock By: Submit By dates were highlighted in red, she said that the red highlighted dates indicated that the dates were late. When asked to clarify, she said that CR #1's discharge assessment had been completed late on 10/26/2022 and had been Locked By: Submit By, late on 11/04/2022. LVN MDS H said that LVN MDS T was the one who worked on CR #1's discharge assessment. She said the Regional RAI was the oversight person for her department that audited and checked to ensure the assessments were exported and transmitted; said the Regional RAI was oversight for a lot of other facilities. She said the MDS department had a director, but she left about 2 weeks ago. LVN MDS H said she was usure if there was a policy or procedure for exporting or transmitting MDS'. Interview with LVN MDS T on 11/30/22 at 3:08 pm she said she did not know how she missed exporting or transmitting CR #1's discharge MDS. She said that it was possible that somehow the assessment got mistakenly checked as do not submit to CMS, instead of submit to CMS. She said that the assessment had been completed late and that it had been locked and submitted late, but she did not know why. She said that she did not know if the Regional RAI completed any audits of her department and apologized for CR #1's discharge not being completed, locked, or exported on time. She said it was an oversight. In a telephone interview on 12/1/22 at 2:13 pm with Regional RAI, she said she would be the regional oversight for the facility's MDS department and that she generally completed audits of the facility MDS' once per year. She said that an audit would usually consist of a record review of a random MDS sample of resident charts and care plans. She said that she would check each individual section of the MDS for accuracy and comparing the documentation in the look back period. She said the transmission, submission and exporting of MDS' would be the responsibility of the facility to monitor and ensure it was being completed and completed on time. The Regional RAI said she was not aware of any MDS issues or concerns at the facility regarding accuracy of assessments, exportation or submission of assessments and could not recall when she had completed her last audit at the facility. Record review of the facility's policy procedure titled MDS Completion and Submission Timeframes, dated as revised July 2017 read in part: Our facility will conduct and submit resident assessments in accordance with current federal and state submission timeframes. 2. Timeframe for completion and submission of assessments is based on the current requirements published in the Resident Assessment Instrument Manual. Record review of the CMS's RAI manual version 3.0 dated October 2019 revealed the following: Discharge assessment .MDS Completion Date .No Later Than .discharge date +14 Calendar Days. Transmission Date No Later Than .MDS Completion Date +14 Calendar Days.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Assessment Accuracy (Tag F0641)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to accurately assess each resident's status for 1 of 48 Residents (Resi...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to accurately assess each resident's status for 1 of 48 Residents (Resident #8) reviewed for assessment accuracy in that: - Resident #8's 5-day MDS dated [DATE] incorrectly coded his use of anticoagulant medication. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the proper care and services due to inaccurate medication coding, and records. Finding include: Record review of Resident #8's admission record revealed he was an [AGE] year old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety (condition affecting the blood flow to the brain that results in changes in memory, thinking and behavior), essential hypertension (high blood pressure not caused by secondary causes or medical conditions), hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol), and retention of urine (difficulty urinating and completely emptying the bladder). Record review of Resident #8's 5-day MDS dated [DATE] revealed he had a BIMS score of 8 indicating that he suffered from moderately impaired cognitive skills for decision making. Resident #8 was coded in section N of the 5-day MDS for medication, as having received 5 days of an anticoagulant (a medication that had the effect of inhibiting the coagulation of blood). Record review of Resident #8's EMR orders revealed Resident #8 had an order dated * for the medication Clopidogrel (Plavix) which was an antiplatelet medication used to reduce the risk of heart disease and stroke. Interview with LVN MDS H on 11/29/22 at 1:21 pm, she said she had completed the 5-day MDS dated [DATE] for Resident #8 and had mistakenly coded his Plavix/Clopidogrel as an anticoagulant and probably should not have because it was an antiplatelet medication. She said she made an error and could modify the MDS to correct it. She said that she used and followed the CMS RAI manual as her guidance and as the policy and procedure she followed. Telephone interview on 12/1/22 at 2:13 pm with Regional RAI who said that she would be the regional oversight for the facility MDS department and that she generally completed audits of the facility MDS' once per year. She said that an audit would usually consist of a record review of a random MDS sample of resident charts and care plans. She said that she would check each individual section of the MDS for accuracy and comparing the documentation in the look back period. She said the transmission, submission and exporting of MDS' would be the responsibility of the facility to monitor and ensure it was being completed and completed on time. The Regional RAI said she was not aware of any MDS issues or concerns at the facility regarding accuracy of assessments, exportation or submission of assessments and could not recall when she had completed her last audit at the facility. Record review of the CMS' RAI Manual 3.0 dated October 2019 revealed the following entry: N0410E, Anticoagulant (e.g., warfarin, heparin, or low- molecular admission/entry or reentry if less than 7 days). Do not code antiplatelet medications such as aspirin/extended release, dipyridamole, or clopidogrel here. received by the resident at any time during the 7-day look-back period (or since admission/entry or reentry if less than 7 days). Do not code antiplatelet medications such as aspirin/extended release, dipyridamole, or clopidogrel here.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0645 (Tag F0645)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure individuals with mental health disorders were provided an a...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure individuals with mental health disorders were provided an accurate PASRR for 1 of 12 residents (Resident # 100) reviewed for PASRR. The facility failed to correctly code Resident #100's PASRR Level I assessment for mental illness. This failure could place residents with mental illness at risk for a diminished quality of life and not receiving necessary care and services in accordance with individually assessed needs. Findings include: Record review of Resident #100's admission record revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included: major depressive disorder, single episode (mental health condition of persistently depressed moods), post-traumatic stress disorder (a disorder in which a person had difficulty recovering after experiencing or witnessing a terrifying event). Record review of Resident #100's PASRR Level I Screening dated 09/19/2022, revealed no evidence or indication that he had a mental illness. Record review of Resident #100's care plan, dated 09/23/2022, revealed the following: Focus: Resident #100 had ineffective coping due to post traumatic stress disorder. Goal: Encourage resident to meet other people with similar interest and participate in group programs. Resident will verbalize feeling safe and a reduction in disturbances (anxiety, flashbacks, depression, nightmares); Interventions: Resident #100 referral to [company name] psychiatric services. Record review of Resident #100's admission MDS assessment, dated 09/26/2022, revealed he was able to make himself-understood and was able to understand others. The resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15 out of 15 which indicated his cognition was intact. His active diagnoses included Depression (other than bipolar) and post-traumatic stress disorder. Resident #100 received anti-depressant medication. Record review of Resident #100's care plan, dated 12/01/2022, revealed: Focus: Resident #100 used antidepressant medications (Trazodone) related to depression; Goal: Resident #100 will show decreased episodes of signs/ symptoms of depression; Interventions: Give antidepressant medications ordered by physician. Monitor/document side effects and effectiveness. Record review of Resident #100's physician's order, dated 12/01/2022, revealed an order Trazodone 50Mg. Give two tablets at bedtime for sleep related to major depressive disorder, single episodes. Order dated 11/01/2022. In an interview on 12/01/2022 at 8:45AM, LVN MDS T stated the purpose of the PASRR was to determine if a resident was positive for mental illness, intellectual disabilities or developmental disabilities and would qualify for specialized services. The risk of an incorrect PASRR screening was the resident would not receive the specialized services they were entitled. The MDS nurse was responsible for the PASRR accuracy. She stated a Major depressive disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder were diagnoses that would be result in a positive PASRR level 1. Resident #100 was not coded correctly due to his major depressive disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder. She stated to prevent this from occurring again we need to pay more attention the resident's diagnosis and review it in our morning meeting. In an interview on 12/01/2020 at 9:50 AM the DON stated the PASRR was to help identify special services a resident maybe entitled. An incorrectly coded PASRR could prevent a resident from specialized services that could benefit their health and quality of life. Resident #100 had major depressive disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder. He was not coded correctly on his PASRR. The DON stated we would review all diagnosis to make sure the PASRR was coded correctly. In an interview on 12/01/2022 at 10:15 AM the Administrator stated the Risk of an incorrectly coded PASRR was the resident may not get additional community services and support to help provide for his care and quality of life. Resident #100 did have diagnoses of major depressive disorder and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder for a positive PASRR. He was not coded correctly and they would review resident diagnosis to make sure PASRR's were coded correctly. Record review of the facility's policy titled readmission Screening and Resident Review Reports (PASRR) last revised dated 09/2017 read in part .The purpose of the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review Reports (PASRR) is to verify that the resident meets the criteria for skilled nursing home placement where required, and as per stated regulations. Policy Detail: A. An initial Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) shall be completed prior to or upon admission of all residents with mental illness (MI) or mental retardation (MR) .
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that food was stored and served in accordance with professional standards for review for food service safety in one of ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that food was stored and served in accordance with professional standards for review for food service safety in one of one kitchens used by the facility, in that: - Hot foods were not held at 135F and above and cold foods were not held at 41F and below. - Pureed foods were not reheated to desired temperature of at least 135F prior to serving the meal. These failures can affect all resident who consume food served by the facility and place them at risk for acquiring a food borne illness. Findings included: Record review of the lunch menu, dated 11/30/2022 included, chicken tenders, pasta salad and steamed chef's vegetables Observations of the kitchen on 11/30/2022 from 11:38AM through 11:50AM, [NAME] A pureed cooked chicken in blender for 10 minutes. Surveyor tasted the finished pureed chicken and it tasted room-temperature. [NAME] A put the pureed chicken in a small pan and passed it to Dietary Aide B without reheating it. The steam table was observed to be full of other food items. Dietary Aide B placed the pureed chicken on the counter beside the steamtable. Another food item on the line that were observed sitting outside of the steamtable included chicken tenders. Observations of the kitchen on 11/30/2022 at 11:50AM through 12:16 PM, revealed [NAME] A pureed cooked blended vegetables, placed it in a pan, did not reheat it, and passed it to Dietary Aide B who placed it in the steam table. Macaroni salad was blended by [NAME] A, put in a pan, handed to Dietary Aide B who placed it on the counter without putting it on ice. Dietary Aide B plated the pureed foods on a plate and warmed it in the microwave for 16 seconds prior to having meal placed on the food cart for meal service. During observations of the food line during meal service on 11/30/2022 at 12:20PM, temperatures of the pureed foods were taken by surveyor using facility thermometer with Food Service Director present. Test tray containing pureed chicken, pureed blended vegetables and pureed macaroni salad revealed food temperatures were 103F, 105F and 93F, respectively. [NAME] A temped the chicken tenders that were sitting outside of the steam table at 87F. Dietary Aide B stated she microwaved the plate of pureed food for 16 second prior to putting on the cart for meal service because [NAME] A handed her the food items straight from the blender, so they were cold. In an interview on 11/30/2022 at 12:21PM with Food Service Director, Executive Chef and Dietary Aide B, Food Service Director stated he normally never seen hot foods sitting outside of the steam table like that, the food was supposed to be sitting in the steam table. Executive Chef stated the food was cold due to the AC vents blowing directly on the uncovered food and some foods are sitting outside the steamtable when they were supposed to be in the steamtable. Dietary Aide B stated this was not the first time foods have sat outside of the steamtable. Dietary Aide B stated it would be helpful to have the chefs condense the foods in the right size pans and set up the steamtable so we could learn from them how it should be set up. In an interview on 12/01/2022 at 10:45AM, Food Service Director stated at time food was being served, hot foods are to be 140F and above while in the steamtable and cold food are to be 41F and below while on ice. He said, however, it was technically okay for the pureed macaroni salad to be above the temperature of 41F as long as it is eaten within 4 hours of meal service. He said any food that was eaten outside of the 4-hour time range was hazardous. He said the mistakes were made yesterday likely due to kitchen staff being nervous. The policies on hot holding and cold holding foods were requested at this time but were not provided prior to exit. Record review of the food temperature log, dated 11/30/2022, revealed that the macaroni salad was temped at 61F prior to meal service. Record review of the FDA Food Code, dated 2017, revealed foods are to be kept at 41F or less for cold holding and kept at 135F or greater for hot holding to prevent growth of pathogens and prevention of foodborne illness.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
  • "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: 1 life-threatening violation(s), $47,300 in fines. Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 12 deficiencies on record, including 1 critical (life-threatening) violation. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
  • • $47,300 in fines. Higher than 94% of Texas facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
  • • Grade F (38/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: Trust Score of 38/100 indicates significant concerns. Thoroughly evaluate alternatives.

About This Facility

What is Champions Healthcare At Willowbrook's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns CHAMPIONS HEALTHCARE AT WILLOWBROOK an overall rating of 2 out of 5 stars, which is considered below average nationally. Within Texas, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.

How is Champions Healthcare At Willowbrook Staffed?

CMS rates CHAMPIONS HEALTHCARE AT WILLOWBROOK's staffing level at 2 out of 5 stars, which is below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 62%, which is 16 percentage points above the Texas average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs. RN turnover specifically is 62%, which is notably high. RNs provide skilled clinical oversight, so turnover in this role can affect medical care quality.

What Have Inspectors Found at Champions Healthcare At Willowbrook?

State health inspectors documented 12 deficiencies at CHAMPIONS HEALTHCARE AT WILLOWBROOK during 2022 to 2025. These included: 1 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death) and 11 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.

Who Owns and Operates Champions Healthcare At Willowbrook?

CHAMPIONS HEALTHCARE AT WILLOWBROOK is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by THE ENSIGN GROUP, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 98 certified beds and approximately 89 residents (about 91% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in HOUSTON, Texas.

How Does Champions Healthcare At Willowbrook Compare to Other Texas Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Texas, CHAMPIONS HEALTHCARE AT WILLOWBROOK's overall rating (2 stars) is below the state average of 2.8, staff turnover (62%) is significantly higher than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (2 stars) is below the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Champions Healthcare At Willowbrook?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations, the facility's high staff turnover rate, and the below-average staffing rating.

Is Champions Healthcare At Willowbrook Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, CHAMPIONS HEALTHCARE AT WILLOWBROOK has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 1 Immediate Jeopardy citation (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 2-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Texas. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.

Do Nurses at Champions Healthcare At Willowbrook Stick Around?

Staff turnover at CHAMPIONS HEALTHCARE AT WILLOWBROOK is high. At 62%, the facility is 16 percentage points above the Texas average of 46%. Registered Nurse turnover is particularly concerning at 62%. RNs handle complex medical decisions and coordinate care — frequent RN changes can directly impact care quality. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?

Was Champions Healthcare At Willowbrook Ever Fined?

CHAMPIONS HEALTHCARE AT WILLOWBROOK has been fined $47,300 across 1 penalty action. The Texas average is $33,552. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.

Is Champions Healthcare At Willowbrook on Any Federal Watch List?

CHAMPIONS HEALTHCARE AT WILLOWBROOK is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.