UNIVERSITY PLACE NURSING CENTER

7480 BEECHNUT, HOUSTON, TX 77074 (713) 541-2900
Non profit - Corporation 60 Beds Independent Data: November 2025 11 Immediate Jeopardy citations
Trust Grade
0/100
#878 of 1168 in TX
Last Inspection: September 2024

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

University Place Nursing Center has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns about the quality of care provided. Ranking #878 out of 1168 in Texas places it in the bottom half of all facilities in the state, and #71 out of 95 in Harris County, meaning there are only a few local options that perform better. Although the facility is improving, with issues decreasing from 16 in 2023 to 12 in 2024, it still faces serious problems, including critical incidents where residents were not properly assessed after falls, leading to untreated fractures and significant pain. On a positive note, staffing is a strength here with a 5/5 star rating and only 38% turnover, which is below the state average. However, the facility's $188,419 in fines is concerning, indicating it has faced compliance issues more often than 98% of Texas facilities.

Trust Score
F
0/100
In Texas
#878/1168
Bottom 25%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Getting Better
16 → 12 violations
Staff Stability
○ Average
38% turnover. Near Texas's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
Penalties
✓ Good
$188,419 in fines. Lower than most Texas facilities. Relatively clean record.
Skilled Nurses
✓ Good
Each resident gets 141 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than 97% of Texas nursing homes. RNs are the most trained staff who catch health problems before they become serious.
Violations
⚠ Watch
30 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Overall Rating
★★★★★
5.0
Staff Levels
★★★★★
5.0
Care Quality
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2023: 16 issues
2024: 12 issues

The Good

  • 5-Star Staffing Rating · Excellent nurse staffing levels
  • 5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record
  • Staff turnover below average (38%)

    10 points below Texas average of 48%

Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, fire safety.

The Bad

2-Star Overall Rating

Below Texas average (2.8)

Below average - review inspection findings carefully

Staff Turnover: 38%

Near Texas avg (46%)

Typical for the industry

Federal Fines: $188,419

Well above median ($33,413)

Significant penalties indicating serious issues

The Ugly 30 deficiencies on record

11 life-threatening
Sept 2024 8 deficiencies 2 IJ
CRITICAL (J)

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Deficiency F0694 (Tag F0694)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure parenteral fluids were administered consistent w...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure parenteral fluids were administered consistent with professional standards of practice and in accordance with physician orders, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's goals and preferences for 1 of 1 (Resident #14) residents reviewed for intravenous fluids. The facility failed to ensure LVN A removed bubbles from the IV tubing, removed air from the syringe and flushed the PICC line before IV medication administration for Resident# 14. An IJ was identified on 09/26/24. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 5:59 p.m. While the IJ was removed on 09/27/24 at 9:40 p.m. The facility remained out of compliance at a severity of no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not an immediate jeopardy and a scope of isolated due to the facility need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrected system. This deficient practice could place residents at risk for serious harm, injury, or death by introducing air into an PICC line which could cause an air embolism (bubbles trapped in a blood vessel that can block blood flow). Findings include: Record review of Resident #14's face sheet dated 09/12/24 revealed he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #14 had diagnoses which included: diabetes mellitus (the body cannot control the amount of sugar in the blood), hypertension (pressure in the blood vessels is always higher than normal), and heart failure (when heart is unable to pump enough oxygenated blood to meet the body's needs). Record review of Resident #14's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 13 of 15 which indicated intact cognition. Further review revealed the resident needed moderate to extensive assistance with ADLs which required at least one staff assistance. Further review did not reflect Resident #14 was on IV medication. Record review of Resident #14's care plan initiated on 07/28/24 revealed resident had an ADL self-care deficit related to inability to perform activities of daily living independently. Intervention: Requires assistance of staff. Further review reflected the resident was on IV antibiotic therapy related to infection osteomyelitis of the right toe. Intervention: administer medication as ordered. Record review of Resident #14's clinical physician orders read in part . PICC/CENTRAL LINE (Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter): flush with 10 CC NS each shift before medication administration .order date 07/25/24 . meropenem intravenous solution reconstituted 500mg every 12 hours for osteomyelitis(bone infection ) for 2 weeks start date 09/04/24 . During an observation on 09/11/24 at 6:52 a.m., LVN A administered IV meropenem 500 mg intravenously to Resident #14, who was lying in bed on his back. LVN A went into the medication room, brought the medication and the tubing, and placed the medication at the nursing station. LVN A broke the medication seal, spiked the medication bag with the tubing, hung it on the IV pole, and cleaned Resident #14's port. After LVN A cleaned Resident #14's port, he opened the clamp, and the medication flowed into the tubing. There were numerous bubbles in the tubing a few inches below the chamber and at intervals throughout the tubing. LVN A was about to connect the tubing to the port on Resident #14's arm when the surveyor intervened. LVN A said he was moving too fast and should have primed the medication and removed all the bubbles. LVN A primed the tubing and removed the bubbles. LVNA was about to connect the tubing to Resident #14's port without flushing the port, and the surveyor intervened. LVN A opened the flush and was about to flush Resident #14's port, but he did not remove the air in the flush. LVN A was about to insert the flush syringe into Resident #14's port when the surveyor intervened, and he primed the flush and administered the medication. During an interview on 09/11/24 at 3:54 p.m., LVN A said he did not realize the IV line had bubbles, and if he had administered the IV medication with bubbles, he could have caused Resident #14 to have an air embolism (bubbles trapped in a blood vessel that can block blood flow) . LVN A said he did not take out the air in the flush, and it was unsafe for Resident #14 because that would be air going through Resident #14's vein. LVN A said he had training in IV medication administration, and the DON and clinical manager monitored the nurses during rounding. During an interview on 09/12/24 at 11:55 a.m., The DON said LVN A should have ensured all the air was out of the tubing before he hooked up to Resident #14's port. The DON said LVN A should have primed the IV line to prevent air embolism and pain. The DON said LVN A should have flushed the port before administering the medication. The DON said the line should be flushed to make sure the line was patent (open and unobstructed free passage) and there was no clot or infiltration. During an interview on 09/26/24 at 2:55 p.m., LVN A said the facility provided in-services in the last month, and he did skills check-off, but the facility did not provide a certificate. LVN A said he never did a training that issued an IV administration certificate. During an interview on 09/26/24 at 3:27 p.m., the DON said their contract pharmacy had done the nurse's IV Training. Still, the pharmacy representative told her he could not locate any training for facility nurses from 2021 to the present. The DON said RNs and LVNs should have an IV Administration Certificate before administering their first IV and be monitored during their first IV administration. The DON said she did not know if the IV Certificate was a requirement with the facility, State, or Board of Nursing, but she would look into it. During an interview on 09/26/24 at 3:53 p.m., the NP said she did not get a call from the facility about LVN A's attempt to administer IV medication with bubbles in the line and not flushing the line before administering the medication. The NP said LVN A should have primed the tubing and made sure there were no bubbles in the line, if the bubble was big(3mm), then the bubble could cause respiratory distress, air embolism. The NP said LVN A should have pushed out the air from the flush syringe before he attempted to flush Resident #14's port, which was done to make sure the line was patent. The NP said 3mm of air could be bad for Resident #14. During an interview on 09/26/24 at 3:58 p.m., the Educator said IV certification was not required, but nurses are checked off on IV medication skills. The Educator said IV monitoring and staff rounding should be done randomly and periodically by the CM and the DON. The Educator said if issues are observed, the facility will go back and look at where the nurse had a hard time with skills, and the nurse would be retrained. During an interview on 09/27/24 at 10:59 a.m., the DON said the system breakdown happened when LVN A did not follow the correct procedure of IV medication administration because he did not lock the IV tubing before he spiked the IV medication bag. The DON said it caused the medication to flow fast, and bubbles formed in the tubing. The DON said LVN A should have primed the tube until he expelled the bubbles from the tube before he attempted to administer the medication to Resident #14. During an interview on 09/27/24 at 9:30 p.m., the Administrator and DON, the Administrator said there was a break when LVN A did not follow the proper procedure for IV medication. The Administrator stated LVN A was nervous, and LVN A goofed, which caused the error in the IV medication administration procedure. Record review of the facility intravenous medication administration skills - check off dated 11/01/23 revealed LVN A was trained on IV medication administration. Record review of the facility medication and treatment order dated 12/15/24 read in part purpose . to ensure accurate, safe, and effective administration of prescribed medications . policy statement #21 . intravenous Orders: Will specify the type of solution, rate of flow, and volume to be infused . Record review of the facility IV medication administration policy dated 09/27/24 read in part . procedure #4 . prime new administration set, including add - on devices and tubing . #4b . remove cap from the tubing, open roller clamp to prime tubing, then hold the distal end of the tubing over sink, or trash can (keep the tip sterile) and allow all of the air bubbles to leave the tubing . #4c . ensure that no air bubble remain in tubing . Record review of the Texas board of nursing practice read . It is the opinion of the Board that the LVN shall not engage in IV therapy related to either peripheral or central venous catheters, including venipuncture, administration of IV fluids, and/or administration of IV push medications, until successful completion of a validation course that instructs the LVN in the knowledge and skills applicable to the LVN's IV therapy practice. The BON does not define or set qualifications for an IV Validation Course or for LVN IV certification. The LVN who chooses to engage in IV therapy must first have been instructed in the principles of IV therapy congruent with prevailing nursing practice standards . This was determined to be an Immediate jeopardy (IJ) on 09/26/24 at 5:59 p.m. The Administrator, Senior [NAME] President, DON and [NAME] Present for Post - Acute Care, was notified. The Administrator was provided with the IJ template on 09/26/24 at 5:59p.m. The following Plan of Removal was accepted on 09/27/24 at 12:26p.m. a.m. PLAN OF REMOVAL Facility Name Immediate Jeopardy Plan of Removal Annual Survey Completed: 09/11/2024 Survey Reopened: 09/26/2024 Notice of IJ: 09/26/2024 F-694 Parenteral Fluids / IV Fluids The facility has implemented the following Plan confirming systems are in place to ensure that the nursing staff have and demonstrate competency skill sets necessary to safely administer parenteral/intravenous (IV) medications including, but not limited to, checking for contraindications to ordered IV medication; confirming that the correct medication is selected with the appropriate concentration and dosage; practicing strict sterile technique when preparing and administering the IV medications; verifying correct IV equipment is used; completing hand hygiene; priming the IV tubing and ensuring there are no air bubbles in the line; inspecting the IV insertion site for signs of infection and infiltration; disinfecting the IV insertion site; flushing the IV site prior to connecting the tubing with the IV medication; administering medications at the prescribed rate to avoid complications; documenting correct information; and reporting. For further details, see No. 4 below. Immediate Action: Document here the action taken by the facility to ensure there are no residents in jeopardy or threat of harm. This could include assessing residents, reviewing records, assessing environmental concerns, providing training to immediate staff. Date each task and if needed when task will be completed and who is responsible for completing the task (if a contractor or supplies need to be coordinated what day the service or goods are available to the facility). 1. The facility initially undertook corrective action with regards to Resident #14. The facility confirmed that Resident #14 was discharged from the facility on September 24, 2024. At the time of the survey, and after prompting by the Surveyor, the involved LVN administering Resident 14's IV medications correctly primed the IV tubing, flushed the IV, and correctly administered the ordered IV medication. 2. After being alerted by the surveyor to what happened, the Director of Nursing immediately performed just-in-time education on the appropriate procedure for administering IV medications with the involved LVN, who successfully demonstrated the correct procedure to administer IV medications. 3. The facility reviewed and revised its clinical guideline entitled Central Venous Access, Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters, Implanted Access Ports, and Peripheral Venous Access - Nursing Center to include more detail about the administration of IV medications. The facility also developed an IV Administration Checklist to include the step-by-step process for administration of IV medications. This updated process includes: Process: 1. Equipment and Supplies Steps 1. Non-sterile gloves; 2. Infusion administration sets (tubing and add-on devices); 3. Add-on devices: o Catheter end cap, injection port; o Filters (if necessary); o Stopcock; and o Extension tubing. 4. Infusate solution; and 5. Alcohol pads. 2. Assessment: Inspect intravenous catheter for any signs/symptoms of IV related complications at scheduled intervals. Observe equipment for sterility or problems. 3. Steps in the Procedure: Perform Hand Hygiene Prepare equipment: a. Attach add-on devices to administration set; b. Clamp new administration tubing; c. Spike access site of infusate container with new administration set; and d. Hang infusate from IV pole. Prime new administration set, including add-on devices and tubing: a. Squeeze drip chamber to fill according to manufacturer's instructions (1/3 to 1/2 full); b. Remove cap from tubing, open roller clamp to prime tubing, then hold distal end of tubing over sink or trash can (keep tip sterile) and allow all of the air bubbles to leave tubing; c. Ensure that no air bubbles remain in tubing; and d. When primed, clamp tubing and replace cap. Don clean non-sterile gloves. Connecting new tubing: a. Disinfect catheter hub with antiseptic solution (usually alcohol); b. Remove cap from distal end of new tubing; c. Attach primed tubing to catheter access cap; and d. Secure connection by screwing tubing into catheter access cap. Tape connections if needed for extra security. Resume Infusion: a. Unclamp catheter; b. Open roller clamp; c. Check pump program or flow regulator device for proper rate/volume; and d. Observe flow rate for 1-2 minutes to ensure accuracy. Discard used supplies. Remove gloves and perform hand antisepsis. Label administration set and tubing with date, time and initials. 4. Documentation: 1.The date and time of the administration set change. 2. The type of flow-control device. 3.The type of solution or medication infusing. 4.The amount of solution or medication to be infused. 5.The rate of infusion. 6.The condition of the IV site. 7. Notification of the physician of any intravenous complications. 8.Resident's response to treatment. 9. The signature and title of the person recording the data. 5. Reporting 1.Notify physician, supervisor and oncoming shift of Resident refusal of procedure or any complications. 2. Report other information in accordance with facility policy and professional standards of practice. 1. The facility is using the IV Administration Checklist to evaluate staff competency on IV medication administration. 2. The Director of Nursing/Designee re-educated all nursing staff on the revised clinical guideline entitled Central Venous Access, Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters, Implanted Access Ports, and Peripheral Venous Access - Nursing Center to include the step-by-step process for the administration of IV medications. 3. Utilizing the newly developed IV Administration Checklist, the Director of Nursing/Designee re-educated nursing staff on the process for administering IV medications as outlined in No. 3 above. No staff will be allowed to schedule shifts without first completing this re-education with demonstrated competency. 4. All newly employed nursing staff will be educated on IV medication administration utilizing the Guideline and the newly developed IV Administration Checklist. 5. Annually all nursing staff will undergo competency validation for IV medication administration. ***The effectiveness of the re-education and the competency of the nursing staff will be measured by reviewing fallouts from the audits performed by the Director of Nursing/Designee and providing just-in-time re-education of the staff member responsible for the fallout. Also, for identified areas of non-compliance, staff members will be re-educated in mandatory staff meetings held monthly. Attendance at these meetings will be tracked. ***All staff members will be educated on the process for IV medication administration described above before being allowed to work a shift. Completion Date: September 27, 2024 Facility's Plan to Ensure Compliance Quickly: How will the facility ensure compliance efficiently and timely? This could involve developing policies and procedures, training staff, repairing equipment, contacting physicians, having a QAIP meeting, developing forms, making repairs, or developing a new system. Be sure to document who provides the training, dates of training and how competency of staff of learning and training (return demonstrations, testing, competency checks). Please make sure dates of trainings are documented and if staff involvement is required that the staff member will not assume any job responsibilities until training has been received by them. Please make sure all audits, policies, notifications or services provided by outside contractors to remove the potential harm are dated. 1. The Director of Nursing immediately performed just-in-time education on the appropriate procedure for administering IV medications with the involved LVN, who demonstrated competency in the procedure. 2. The facility reviewed and revised its clinical guideline entitled Central Venous Access, Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters, Implanted Access Ports, and Peripheral Venous Access - Nursing Center to include more detail on the administration of IV medications. 3. The facility developed a new IV Administration Checklist to evaluate staff competency on IV medication administration. 4. The Director of Nursing/Designee re-educated all nursing staff on the revised clinical guideline entitled Central Venous Access, Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters, Implanted Access Ports, and Peripheral Venous Access - Nursing Center to include the step-by-step process for the administration of IV medications. 5. Utilizing the newly developed IV Administration Checklist, the Director of Nursing/Designee re-educated nursing staff on the process for administering IV medications as outlined in No. 3 above. No staff will be allowed to schedule shifts without first completing this re-education with demonstrated competency. What program will be put into place to monitor the continued effectiveness of the system changes? 1. There will be daily observation by the Clinical Educational Specialist/Nursing Manager/Designee of 100% of IV medication administrations for 30 days with 100% compliance. 2. For days thirty-one (31) to ninety (90), the Clinical Educational Specialist/Nursing Manager/Designee will perform random observations of IV medication administration weekly to confirm sustained compliance. 3. During monthly QAPI Committee meetings, the IDT team will review the results of the observations/audits performed by the Clinical Educational Specialist/Nursing Manager/Designee and follow-up monthly to ensure adherence to policies/procedures. PIPs will be developed to address any areas of concern. Completion Date: September 27, 2024 Responsible Person: Director of Nursing/Designee Surveyor monitored the plan of removal for effectiveness as follows: Record review of the facility just in time training revealed the DON did one on training for LVN A on 09/11/24 on IV medication administration and he returned demonstration. Record review of the facility policy on clinical guideline for central venous access peripherally inserted central catheter, implanted access port, and peripheral venous access reflected the facility included a step by step administration of IV medication. Record review of the facility training for nurses dated 09/26/24 and 09/27/24 revealed the nurses were trained with new skills check off which revealed process and steps from equipment and supplies gathering, maintaining infection control, assessment, steps in the procedure for IV medication administration, documentation and reporting. During interviews on 09/27/24 between 12:10 p.m. and 12:16 P.m., the MC and IP said the educator retrained them on IV medication administration from gathering supplies and equipment, medication verification, verification of resident, and maintaining infection control during medication administration. The MC and IP said the nurse should prep IV medication in the resident room on a clean field, then hang the medication bag on the pole, and the clamp and flow dial on the IV tubing should be closed before spiking the IV medication bag. The MC and IP said that after spiking the medication bag, you would open the flow dial, clamp, prime the tubing, make sure there was no bubble, and hang the tubing on the pole. The MC and IP said the nurse should prime the flush syringe before use; clean the port, flush the port; administered medication; and monitor the resident during medication administration. The MC and IP said after the nurse had administered the medication, the nurse would flush the resident's port with a primed flush syringe, and the resident would be monitored and documented. During an interview on 09/27/24 between 12:33 p.m. and 1:16 p.m., four nurses (2 RN and 2LVN) from day and night shifts were interviewed said the nurse should prep IV medication in the resident room on a clean field, then hang the medication bag on the pole, and close the clamp and flow dial on the IV tubing before spiking the IV medication bag. All nurses said that after spiking the medication bag, you would open the flow dial, the clamp, prime the tubing, make sure there was no bubble in the tubing. All of nurses said the nurse should prime the flush syringe before use; clean the port, flush the port; administered medication; and monitor the resident during medication administration. All nurses said after the nurse had administered the medication, the nurse would flush the resident's port with a primed flush syringe, and the resident would be monitored and documented. During an interview on 09/27/24 between 2:33 p.m. and 4:38 p.m., four nurses (2 RN and 2 LVN) from day and night shifts were interviewed said the nurse should prep IV medication in the resident room on a clean field, then hang the medication bag on the pole, and close the clamp and flow dial on the IV tubing before spiking the IV medication bag. All nurses said that after spiking the medication bag, you would open the flow dial, the clamp, prime the tubing, make sure there was no bubble in the tubing. All of nurses said the nurse should prime the flush syringe before use; clean the port, flush the port; administered medication; and monitor the resident during medication administration. All nurses said after the nurse had administered the medication, the nurse would flush the resident's port with a primed flush syringe, and the resident would be monitored and documented. During an interview on 09/27/24 at 3:02 p.m., the DON said she reviewed the facility policy on IV medication administration and created a new skills check-off list, which she used to train the nurses. The DON said the new skills check-off has processes and steps from equipment and supplies, assessment, steps in the procedure for IV medication administration, documentation, and reporting. The DON said she retrained the nurses. The DON said the facility had not placed the IV medication administration procedure error in QAPI, but the facility would discuss it when they have a QAPI meeting in 2 weeks, which is between October 8 and 9, 2024. During an observation on 09/27/24 at 7:50 p.m., LVN O administered IV medication to Resident #400 (Ceftriaxone 1 gm (50ML) infuse over 30 minutes at 100 ml/hour. LVN O gathered supplies from the medication room. LVN O cleaned the medication cart, placed a barrier, placed her medication and tubing, and syringes flush. LVN O sanitized her hands, donned her PPE, knocked on Resident #400's door, entered Resident #400's, introduced herself, and verified Resident #400 and medication. LVN O notified Resident #400 that she would administer his ABT for UTI. LVN O placed the pole beside Resident #400, seated in his wheelchair. The medication came mixed, and LVN O opened the IV tubing, closed off the flow dial and clamp, and spiked the medication bag. LVN O opened the flow dial and the clamp and primed the medication to flow through the tubing, three drops of medication were expelled from the tubing, and there was no bubble in the tubing. LVN O placed the tubing on the pole and primed the flush syringe. LVN O cleaned the port for 15 minutes and let the port air dry. LVN O flushed the port, administered the IV medication, and labeled the tubing. LVN O returned at 8:55 p.m. to Resident #40's room and checked the IV medication. There was still medication left in the tubing, about half of the tubing, and LVN O told Resident #400 that she would be back in a few minutes. LVN O returned to Resident #40's room and disconnected the IV tubing at 9:13 p.m. LVN O primed another flush syringe, flushed Resident #400's port, and capped it. LVN O assessed the IV site, and Resident #400 said he was fine. During an interview on 09/27/24 between 6:56 p.m. and 9:14 p.m., four nurses (2 RN and 2 LVN) from the night shift were interviewed said the nurse should prep IV medication in the resident room on a clean field, then hang the medication bag on the pole, and close the clamp and flow dial on the IV tubing before spiking the IV medication bag. All nurses said that after spiking the medication bag, you would open the flow dial, the clamp, prime the tubing, make sure there was no bubble in the tubing. All of nurses said the nurse should prime the flush syringe before use; clean the port, flush the port; administered medication; and monitor the resident during medication administration. All nurses said after the nurse had administered the medication, the nurse would flush the resident's port with a primed flush syringe, and the resident would be monitored and documented. On 09/27/24 at 9:40 p.m., the Administrator, the DON, the vice president were notified the Immediate Jeopardy was removed. However, the facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of no actual harm with potential for more than minimum harm that is not immediate Jeopardy and a scope of isolated due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems.
CRITICAL (J)

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Deficiency F0726 (Tag F0726)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure licensed nurses are able to demonstrate compet...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure licensed nurses are able to demonstrate competency in skills and techniques necessary to care for residents' needs for 1of 1 residents (Resident #14) provided care by 1 of 1 staff (LVN A) reviewed for proficiency of license nurses. The facility failed to have a system in place to ensure the competency of nurses in Intravenous (IV) therapy techniques and failed to ensure LVN A demonstrated competency when he did not remove bubbles from the IV tubing, remove air from the syringe and flush the PICC line port before IV medication administration for Resident# 14. An IJ was identified on 09/26/24. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 5:59 p.m. While the IJ was removed on 09/27/24 at 9:40 p.m., with the Administrator, Senior [NAME] President, DON and [NAME] Present for Post - Acute Care. The facility remained out of compliance at a severity of no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not an immediate jeopardy and a scope of isolated due to the facility need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrected system. These failures could place Residents requiring Intravenous therapy at risk for serious harm, injury, and adverse effect from improper Intravenous (IV) therapy techniques. Findings include: Record review of Resident #14's face sheet dated 09/12/24 revealed he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #14 had diagnoses which included: diabetes mellitus (the body cannot control the amount of sugar in the blood), hypertension (pressure in the blood vessels is always higher than normal), and heart failure (when heart is unable to pump enough oxygenated blood to meet the body's needs). Record review of Resident #14's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 13 of 15 which indicated intact cognition. Further review revealed the resident needed moderate to extensive assistance with ADLs which required at least one staff assistance. Further review did not reflect Resident #14 was on IV medication. Record review of Resident #14's care plan initiated on 07/28/24 revealed resident had an ADL self-care deficit related to inability to perform activities of daily living independently. Intervention: Requires assistance of staff. Further review reflected the resident was on IV antibiotic therapy related to infection osteomyelitis of the right toe. Intervention: administer medication as ordered. inability to perform activities of daily living independently. Intervention: Requires assistance of staff. Record review of Resident #14's clinical physician orders read in part . PICC/CENTRAL LINE (Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter): flush with 10 CC NS each shift before medication administration .order date 07/25/24 . meropenem intravenous solution reconstituted 500mg every 12 hours for osteomyelitis(bone infection ) for 2 weeks start date 09/04/24 . During an observation on 09/11/24 at 6:52 a.m., LVN A administered IV meropenem 500 mg intravenously to Resident #14, who was lying in bed on his back. LVN A went into the medication room, brought the medication and the tubing, and placed the medication at the nursing station. LVN A broke the medication seal, spiked the medication bag with the tubing, hung it on the IV pole, and cleaned Resident #14's port. After LVN A cleaned Resident #14's port, he opened the clamp, and the medication flowed into the tubing. There were bubbles in the tubing from a few inches below the chamber and at intervals throughout the tubing, and LVN A was about to connect the tubing to the port on Resident #14's arm when the surveyor intervened. LVN A said he was moving too fast and should have primed the medication and removed all the bubbles. Then LVN A primed the tubing and removed the bubbles. LVNA was about to connect the tubing to Resident #14's port without flushing the port, and the surveyor intervened. Then LVN A opened the flush and was about to flush Resident #14's port, but he did not remove the air in the flush. LVN A was about to insert the flush syringe into Resident #14 port when the surveyor intervened, and he primed the flush and administered the medication. During an interview on 09/11/24 at 3:54 p.m., LVN A said he did not realize the IV line had bubbles, and if he had administered the IV medication with bubbles, he could have caused Resident #14 to have an air embolism (bubbles trapped in a blood vessel that can block blood flow) . LVN A said he did not take out the air in the flush, and it was unsafe for Resident #14 because that would be air going through Resident #14's vein. LVN A said he had training in IV medication administration, and the DON and clinical manager monitored the nurses during rounding. During an interview on 09/12/24 at 11:55 a.m., The DON said LVN A should have ensured all the air was out of the tubing before he hooked up to Resident #14's port. The DON said LVN A should have primed the IV line to prevent air embolism and pain. The DON said LVN A should have flushed the port before administering the medication. The DON said the line should be flushed to make sure the line was patent (open and unobstructed free passage) and there was no clot or infiltration. During an interview on 09/26/24 at 2:55 p.m., LVN A said the facility provided in-services in the last month, and he did skills check-off, but the facility did not provide a certificate. LVN A said he never did a training that issued an IV administration certificate. During an interview on 09/26/24 at 3:27 p.m., the DON said that their contract pharmacy had done the nurse's IV Training. Still, the pharmacy representative told her he could not locate any training for facility nurses from 2021 to the present. The DON said RNs and LVNs should have an IV Administration Certificate before administering their first IV and be monitored during their first IV administration. The DON said she did not know if the IV Certificate was a requirement with the facility, State, or Board of Nursing, but she would look into it. During an interview on 09/26/24 at 3:53 p.m., NP said she did not get a call from the facility about LVN A attempted to administer IV medication with bubbles in the line or not flushing the line before administering the medication. NP said LVN A should have primed the tubing and made sure there were no bubbles in the line, but if the bubble was small, it might not cause any harm to Resident #14, but if the bubble was big(3mm), then the bubble could cause respiratory distress, air embolism. NP said LVN A should have pushed out the air from the flush syringe before he attempted to flush Resident #14's port, which was done to make sure the line was patent. The NP said 3mm of air could be bad for Resident #14. During an interview on 09/26/24 at 3:58 p.m., the Educator said IV certification was not required, but nurses are checked off on IV medication skills. The Educator said IV monitoring and staff rounding should be random and periodically by the CM and the DON. The Educator said if issues are observed, the facility will go back and look at where the nurse is having a hard time with skills, and the nurse would be retrained. During an interview on 09/26/24 at 4:59 p.m., the DON said the Educator and CM should randomly check the nurses for IV medication administration. The DON said since LVN A did not perform the IV medication administration as trained, the training was ineffective, and the Educator would re-educate LVN A. During an interview on 09/26/24 at 5:16 p.m., the Educator said the train was ineffective because LVN A did not demonstrate the competency needed for IV medication administration when he administered IV medication to Resident #14. During an interview on 09/27/24 at 10:59 a.m., the DON said the system breakdown happened when LVN A did not follow the correct procedure of IV medication administration because he did not lock the IV tubing before he spiked the IV medication bag. The DON said it caused the medication to flow fast, and bubbles formed in the tubing. The DON said LVN A should have primed the tube until he expelled the bubbles from the tube before he attempted to administer the medication to Resident #14. During an interview on 09/27/24 at 9:30 p.m., the Administrator and DON, the Administrator said there was a break when LVN A did not follow the proper procedure for IV medication. The Administrator stated LVN A was nervous, and LVN A goofed, which caused the error in the IV medication administration procedure. Record review of the facility medication and treatment order dated 12/15/24 read in part purpose . to ensure accurate, safe, and effective administration of prescribed medications . policy statement #21 . intravenous Orders: Will specify the type of solution, rate of flow, and volume to be infused . Record review of the facility IV medication administration policy dated 09/27/24 read in part . procedure #4 . prime new administration set, including add - on devices and tubing . #4b . remove cap from the tubing, open roller clamp to prime tubing, then hold the distal end of the tubing over sink, or trash can (keep the tip sterile) and allow all of the air bubbles to leave the tubing . #4c . ensure that no air bubble remain in tubing . Record review of the Texas board of nursing practice read . It is the opinion of the Board that the LVN shall not engage in IV therapy related to either peripheral or central venous catheters, including venipuncture, administration of IV fluids, and/or administration of IV push medications, until successful completion of a validation course that instructs the LVN in the knowledge and skills applicable to the LVN's IV therapy practice. The BON does not define or set qualifications for an IV Validation Course or for LVN IV certification. The LVN who chooses to engage in IV therapy must first have been instructed in the principles of IV therapy congruent with prevailing nursing practice standards . This was determined to be an Immediate jeopardy (IJ) on 09/26/24 at 5:59 p.m. The Administrator, Senior [NAME] President, DON and [NAME] Present for Post - Acute Care, was notified. The Administrator was provided with the IJ template on 09/26/24 at 5:59p.m. The following Plan of Removal submitted by the facility was accepted on 09/27/24 at 12:26p.m. a.m. PLAN OF REMOVAL [Facility} Medicare [number] Immediate Jeopardy Plan of Removal Annual Survey Completed: 09/11/2024 Survey Reopened: 09/26/2024 Notice of IJ: 09/26/2024 F-726 Competent Nursing Staff Facility has implemented the following Plan confirming systems are in place to ensure that the nursing staff have and demonstrate competency skill sets necessary to safely administer intravenous (IV) medications including, but not limited to, checking for contraindications to ordered IV medication; confirming that the correct medication is selected with the appropriate concentration and dosage; practicing strict sterile technique when preparing and administering the IV medications; verifying correct IV equipment is used; completing hand hygiene; priming the IV tubing and ensuring there are no air bubbles in the line; inspecting the IV insertion site for signs of infection and infiltration; disinfecting the IV insertion site; flushing the IV site prior to connecting the tubing with the IV medication; administering medications at the prescribed rate to avoid complications; documenting correct information; and reporting. For further details, see No. 4 below. Immediate Action: Document here the action taken by the facility to ensure there are no residents in jeopardy or threat of harm. This could include assessing residents, reviewing records, assessing environmental concerns, providing training to immediate staff. Date each task and if needed when task will be completed and who is responsible for completing the task (if a contractor or supplies need to be coordinated what day the service or goods are available to the facility). 6. The facility initially undertook corrective action with regards to Resident #14. The facility confirmed that Resident #14 was discharged from the facility on September 24, 2024. At the time of the survey and after prompting by the surveyor, the involved LVN administering Resident 14's IV medications correctly primed the IV tubing, flushed the IV, and correctly administered the ordered IV medication. 7. After being alerted by the surveyor to what happened, the Director of Nursing immediately performed just-in-time education on the appropriate procedure for administering IV medications with the involved LVN, who then successfully demonstrated the correct procedure to administer IV medications. 8. The facility reviewed and revised its clinical guideline entitled Central Venous Access, Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters, Implanted Access Ports, and Peripheral Venous Access - Nursing Center to include more detail about the administration of IV medications. The facility also developed an IV Administration Checklist to include the step-by-step process for administration of IV medications. This updated process includes: Process: 1. Equipment and Supplies Steps 1. Non-sterile gloves; 2. Infusion administration sets (tubing and add-on devices); 3. Add-on devices: o Catheter end cap, injection port; o Filters (if necessary); o Stopcock; and o Extension tubing. 4. Infusate solution; and 5. Alcohol pads. 2. Assessment: Inspect intravenous catheter for any signs/symptoms of IV related complications at scheduled intervals. Observe equipment for sterility or problems. 3. Steps in the Procedure: Perform Hand Hygiene Prepare equipment: a. Attach add-on devices to administration set; b. Clamp new administration tubing; c. Spike access site of infusate container with new administration set; and d. Hang infusate from IV pole. Prime new administration set, including add-on devices and tubing: a. Squeeze drip chamber to fill according to manufacturer's instructions (1/3 to 1/2 full); b. Remove cap from tubing, open roller clamp to prime tubing, then hold distal end of tubing over sink or trash can (keep tip sterile) and allow all of the air bubbles to leave tubing; c. Ensure that no air bubbles remain in tubing; and d. When primed, clamp tubing and replace cap. Don clean non-sterile gloves. Connecting new tubing: a. Disinfect catheter hub with antiseptic solution (usually alcohol); b. Remove cap from distal end of new tubing; c. Attach primed tubing to catheter access cap; and d. Secure connection by screwing tubing into catheter access cap. Tape connections if needed for extra security. Resume Infusion: a. Unclamp catheter; b. Open roller clamp; c. Check pump program or flow regulator device for proper rate/volume; and d. Observe flow rate for 1-2 minutes to ensure accuracy. Discard used supplies. Remove gloves and perform hand antisepsis. Label administration set and tubing with date, time and initials. 4. Documentation: 1.The date and time of the administration set change. 2. The type of flow-control device. 3.The type of solution or medication infusing. 4.The amount of solution or medication to be infused. 5.The rate of infusion. 6.The condition of the IV site. 7. Notification of the physician of any intravenous complications. 8.Resident's response to treatment. 9. The signature and title of the person recording the data. 5. Reporting 1.Notify physician, supervisor and oncoming shift of Resident refusal of procedure or any complications. 2. Report other information in accordance with facility policy and professional standards of practice. 9. The facility is using the IV Administration Checklist to evaluate staff competency on IV medication administration. 10. The Director of Nursing/Designee re-educated all nursing staff on the revised clinical guideline entitled Central Venous Access, Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters, Implanted Access Ports, and Peripheral Venous Access - Nursing Center to include the step-by-step process for the administration of IV medications. 11. Utilizing the newly developed IV Administration Checklist, the Director of Nursing/Designee re-educated nursing staff on the process for administering IV medications as outlined in No. 3 above. No staff will be allowed to schedule shifts without first completing this re-education with demonstrated competency. 12. All newly employed nursing staff will be educated on IV medication administration utilizing the Guideline and the newly developed IV Administration Checklist. 13. Annually all nursing staff will undergo competency validation for IV medication administration. ***The effectiveness of the re-education and the competency of the nursing staff will be measured by reviewing fallouts from the audits performed by the Director of Nursing/Designee and providing just-in-time re-education of the staff member responsible for the fallout. Also, for identified areas of non-compliance, staff members will be re-educated in mandatory staff meetings held monthly. Attendance at these meetings will be tracked. ***All staff members will be educated on the process for IV medication administration described above before being allowed to work a shift. Completion Date: September 27, 2024 Facility's Plan to Ensure Compliance Quickly: How will the facility ensure compliance efficiently and timely? This could involve developing policies and procedures, training staff, repairing equipment, contacting physicians, having a QAIP meeting, developing forms, making repairs, or developing a new system. Be sure to document who provides the training, dates of training and how competency of staff of learning and training (return demonstrations, testing, competency checks). Please make sure dates of trainings are documented and if staff involvement is required that the staff member will not assume any job responsibilities until training has been received by them. Please make sure all audits, policies, notifications or services provided by outside contractors to remove the potential harm are dated. 6. The Director of Nursing immediately performed just-in-time education on the appropriate procedure for administering IV medications with the involved LVN, who demonstrated competency in the procedure. 7. The facility reviewed and revised its clinical guideline entitled Central Venous Access, Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters, Implanted Access Ports, and Peripheral Venous Access - Nursing Center to include more detail on the administration of IV medications. 8. The facility developed a new IV Administration Checklist to evaluate staff competency on IV medication administration. 9. The Director of Nursing/Designee re-educated all nursing staff on the revised clinical guideline entitled Central Venous Access, Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters, Implanted Access Ports, and Peripheral Venous Access - Nursing Center to include the step-by-step process for the administration of IV medications. 10. Utilizing the newly developed IV Administration Checklist, the Director of Nursing/Designee re-educated nursing staff on the process for administering IV medications as outlined in No. 3 above. No staff will be allowed to schedule shifts without first completing this re-education with demonstrated competency. What program will be put into place to monitor the continued effectiveness of the system changes? 4. There will be daily observation by the Clinical Educational Specialist/Nursing Manager/Designee of 100% of IV medication administrations for 30 days with 100% compliance. 5. For days thirty-one (31) to ninety (90), the Clinical Educational Specialist/Nursing Manager/Designee will perform at random observations of IV medication administration weekly to confirm sustained compliance. 6. During monthly QAPI Committee meetings, the IDT team will review the results of the observations/audits performed by the Clinical Educational Specialist/Nursing Manager/Designee and follow-up monthly to ensure adherence to policies/procedures. PIPs will be developed to address any areas of concern. Completion Date: September 27, 2024 Responsible Person: Director of Nursing/Designee Surveyor monitored the plan of removal for effectiveness as follows: Record review of the facility just in time training revealed the DON did one on training for LVN A on 09/11/24 on IV medication administration and he returned demonstration. Record review of the facility policy on clinical guideline for central venous access peripherally inserted central catheter, implanted access port, and peripheral venous access reflected the facility included a step by step administration of IV medication. Record review of the facility training for nurses dated 09/26/24 and 09/27/24 revealed the nurses were trained with new skills check off which revealed process and steps from equipment and supplies gathering, maintaining infection control, assessment, steps in the procedure for IV medication administration, documentation and reporting. During interviews on 09/27/24 between 12:10 p.m. and 12:16 P.m., the MC and IP said the educator retrained them on IV medication administration from gathering supplies and equipment, medication verification, verification of resident, and maintaining infection control during medication administration. The MC and IP said the nurse should prep IV medication in the resident room on a clean field, then hang the medication bag on the pole, and the clamp and flow dial on the IV tubing should be closed before spiking the IV medication bag. The MC and IP said that after spiking the medication bag, you would open the flow dial, clamp, prime the tubing, make sure there was no bubble, and hang the tubing on the pole. The MC and IP said the nurse should prime the flush syringe before use; clean the port, flush the port; administered medication; and monitor the resident during medication administration. The MC and IP said after the nurse had administered the medication, the nurse would flush the resident's port with a primed flush syringe, and the resident would be monitored and documented. During an interview on 09/27/24 between 12:33 p.m. and 1:16 p.m., four nurses (2 RN and 2LVN) from day and night shifts were interviewed said the nurse should prep IV medication in the resident room on a clean field, then hang the medication bag on the pole, and close the clamp and flow dial on the IV tubing before spiking the IV medication bag. All nurses said that after spiking the medication bag, you would open the flow dial, the clamp, prime the tubing, make sure there was no bubble in the tubing. All of nurses said the nurse should prime the flush syringe before use; clean the port, flush the port; administered medication; and monitor the resident during medication administration. All nurses said after the nurse had administered the medication, the nurse would flush the resident's port with a primed flush syringe, and the resident would be monitored and documented. During an interview on 09/27/24 between 2:33 p.m. and 4:38 p.m., four nurses (2 RN and 2 LVN) from day and night shifts were interviewed said the nurse should prep IV medication in the resident room on a clean field, then hang the medication bag on the pole, and close the clamp and flow dial on the IV tubing before spiking the IV medication bag. All nurses said that after spiking the medication bag, you would open the flow dial, the clamp, prime the tubing, make sure there was no bubble in the tubing. All of nurses said the nurse should prime the flush syringe before use; clean the port, flush the port; administered medication; and monitor the resident during medication administration. All nurses said after the nurse had administered the medication, the nurse would flush the resident's port with a primed flush syringe, and the resident would be monitored and documented. During an interview on 09/27/24 at 3:02 p.m., the DON said she reviewed the facility policy on IV medication administration and created a new skills check-off list, which she used to train the nurses. The DON said the new skills check-off has processes and steps from equipment and supplies, assessment, steps in the procedure for IV medication administration, documentation, and reporting. The DON said she retrained the nurses. The DON said the facility had not placed the IV medication administration procedure error in QAPI, but the facility would discuss it when they have a QAPI meeting in 2 weeks, which is between October 8 and 9, 2024. During an observation on 09/27/24 at 7:50 p.m., LVN O administered IV medication to Resident #400 (Ceftriaxone 1 gm (50ML) infuse over 30 minutes at 100 ml/hour. LVN O gathered supplies from the medication room. LVN O cleaned the medication cart, placed a barrier, placed her medication and tubing, and syringes flush. LVN O sanitized her hands, donned her PPE, knocked on Resident #400's door, entered Resident #400's, introduced herself, and verified Resident #400 and medication. LVN O notified Resident #400 that she would administer his ABT for UTI. LVN O placed the pole beside Resident #400, seated in his wheelchair. The medication came mixed, and LVN O opened the IV tubing, closed off the flow dial and clamp, and spiked the medication bag. LVN O opened the flow dial and the clamp and primed the medication to flow through the tubing, three drops of medication were expelled from the tubing, and there was no bubble in the tubing. LVN O placed the tubing on the pole and primed the flush syringe. LVN O cleaned the port for 15 minutes and let the port air dry. LVN O flushed the port, administered the IV medication, and labeled the tubing. LVN O returned at 8:55 p.m. to Resident #40's room and checked the IV medication. There was still medication left in the tubing, about half of the tubing, and LVN O told Resident #400 that she would be back in a few minutes. LVN O returned to Resident #40's room and disconnected the IV tubing at 9:13 p.m. LVN O primed another flush syringe, flushed Resident #400's port, and capped it. LVN O assessed the IV site, and Resident #400 said he was fine. During an interview on 09/27/24 between 6:56 p.m. and 9:14 p.m., four nurses (2 RN and 2 LVN) from the night shift were interviewed said the nurse should prep IV medication in the resident room on a clean field, then hang the medication bag on the pole, and close the clamp and flow dial on the IV tubing before spiking the IV medication bag. All nurses said that after spiking the medication bag, you would open the flow dial, the clamp, prime the tubing, make sure there was no bubble in the tubing. All of nurses said the nurse should prime the flush syringe before use; clean the port, flush the port; administered medication; and monitor the resident during medication administration. All nurses said after the nurse had administered the medication, the nurse would flush the resident's port with a primed flush syringe, and the resident would be monitored and documented. Record review of the facility policy dated 09/26/24 read in part . procedure purpose . establish a facility - wide approach for assessing and maintaining staff competency in the provision of care and services . definitions .competency means the employee demonstrates the skills/procedure safely, correctly, effectively, legally, and has the capacity to complete the skill/procedure independently . On 09/27/24 at 9:40 p.m., the Administrator, the DON, the vice president were notified the Immediate Jeopardy was removed. However, the facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of no actual harm with potential for more than minimum harm that is not immediate Jeopardy and a scope of isolated due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0558 (Tag F0558)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents receive services in the facility wi...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #7) reviewed for call lights. The facility failed to have a call light within reach for Resident #7. This failure could place residents at risk for a delay in care and services, increased falls, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #7's face sheet dated 09/12/24 revealed she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #7 had diagnoses which included: Major depressive disorder (mental health condition that can cause a person to feel persistently low and loss of interest in activities), hypertension (pressure in the blood vessels is always higher than normal), and dementia (decline in mental and physical abilities that interferes with daily life). Record review of Resident #7's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 08 of 15 which indicated moderately impaired cognition. Further review revealed the resident needed partial to moderate assistance with ADLs which required at least one staff assistance. Record review of Resident #7's care plan initiated on 12/26/16 revealed resident had an ADL self-care deficit related to inability to perform activities of daily living independently. Intervention: Requires assistance of staff. During an observation and interview on 09/10/24 at 10:40 a.m., revealed Resident #7's call light was tied up and was placed close to the wall by the insertion site(outlet from the wall). Resident #7 asked the surveyor if she could find her call light, and the surveyor pointed to the wall by Resident #7's bed. Resident #7 tried to reach for the call light but could not. The surveyor stepped out of the room and called the IP to assist Resident #7. During an observation and interview on 09/10/24 at 10:42 a.m., the IP said she saw Resident #7's call light was tied up and close to the wall. The IP said Resident #7's call light was supposed to be within reach. The IP said Resident #7 used the call light to reach staff if Resident #7 needed help. The IP said Resident #7 could fall if she could not reach the call light. During an interview on 09/10/24 at 11:08 a.m., LVN A said Resident #7's call light should be within reach. LVN A said the resident uses the call light to call for assistance. LVN A said if Resident #7 could not reach the call light, Resident #7 could try to get up and fall. LVN A said the nurse monitored the aides during rounding. During an interview on 09/10/24 at 12:17 p.m., CNA D said the call light should be within reach for Resident #7, and she made rounds every two hours. CNA D said she placed the call light within reach for Resident #7 when she made rounds and did not know who tied up the call light string. CNA D said if Resident #7's call light was not within reach and Resident #7 needed help, then there would be delayed care, and if Resident #7 was choking and could not reach the call light, she might pass out or Resident #7 would fall if she tried to get up. CNA D said she had in-service on-call lights, and the nurses monitored the aides during rounding. During an interview on 09/12/24 at 10:06 a.m., the DON said CNA D should place the call light within reach of Resident #7 so Resident #7 could reach it and use it when she needed assistance. The DON said that if Resident #7 could not reach the call light and get help, Resident #7 could try to get out of bed and fall. The DON said the nurse monitored the aides when the nurse made rounds. The DON said the unit manager monitored the nurses when he made rounds and ensured the nurses were checking on the aide while providing any care. During an interview on 09/12/24 at 10:56 a.m., the CM said the expectation was the call light should be always within Resident #7's reach, whether in a chair or bed. The CM said he had the call light was tied up and by the wall for Resident #7, but the call light should always be within reach. The CM said there would be a tendency for Resident #7 to fall if the resident could not reach the call light. The CM also said Resident # 7 could not get the staff on time in an emergency. The CM said the CNA and the nurse were responsible for making sure the call light was within reach. The CM said that all staff should report when the call light was not within reach of any resident. The CM said the nurses were responsible for ensuring the aides were doing their tasks. The CM said the clinical manager and the DON monitored the nurses during rounding. Record review of the facility policy on call system dated August 27, 2024, read in part . purpose . Residents are provided with a means to call staff for assistance through a communication system that directly causes a staff member or centralized working station . statement #1 . each resident is provided with a means to call staff directly for assistance from his /her bed from toileting/bathing facilities and from the floor .
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

MDS Data Transmission (Tag F0640)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to electronically transmit encoded, accurate, and complete MDS data to ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to electronically transmit encoded, accurate, and complete MDS data to the CMS System within 14 days after completing a resident's assessment for 1 (CR#1) 1 resident reviewed for transmitting MDS assessments to CMS. -The Facility failed to complete and transmit a discharge MDS assessment for CR #1. This failure could place residents at risk of not having accurate and complete information available to those providing their treatment and care. Findings included: Record review of Resident CR #1's face sheet dated [DATE] indicated he was [AGE] years old admitted on [DATE] for diagnoses that include fall, initial encounter (the first time a provider evaluates a fall injury or condition) and Dementia (the loss of cognitive functioning - thinking, remembering, and reasoning - to such an extent that it interferes with a person's daily life and activities). The face sheet had a discharge date of [DATE]. Record review of CR #1's Discharge MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated CR #1 was discharged , return not anticipated. CR #1 had a BIMS score of 7 which indicated he had severely impaired cognition. The MDS assessment had a status of completed but not accepted in transmission to CMS. Record review of CR #1's Care Plan dated[DATE] indicated care plans to address falls and cognitive loss/Dementia. Record review of CR #1's Social Services Notes Progress Notes dated [DATE] revealed that CR #1 discharged to an Assisted Living Facility. Record review of transmittal page confirming the discharge MDS was accepted on [DATE] to CMS. During an interview on [DATE] at 10:51 am, with the MDS Coordinator/RN, she said that she had a team's meeting on the evening of [DATE] after the Administrator and DON notified her of the missed MDS assessment. She said unfortunately this MDS was missed and showed the surveyor a copy and explained that it was checked complete but not submitted until yesterday. The MDS/RN said that she is over MDS assessments but does have a colleague. She said the facility was in the process of changing from their current EMR to a different one that would flag issues like this to avoid missing the transmittal to CMS, she added that she used the RAI manual for the policy and procedure. When asked what a negative impact on the resident could be if the MDS assessments were not submitted within the time frames by CMS, she added that the MDS assessment communicated the status of a residents' health status and needs and this was important to reflect care needs or progress. During an interview on [DATE] at 11:00 am, the DON said that the facility met over the missed MDS and were in the process of addressing the tracking and missed transmittal to CMS. During an interview on [DATE], time unknown with the Administrator, he confirmed the meeting to address the missed MDS and confirmed that the missed MDS assessment was transmitted to CMS last night ([DATE]) and that the facility was addressing the missed MDS assessment to avoid missing any assessments in the future. Record review of facility provided CMS's RAI Version 3.0 Manual, Chapter 5: Submission and Correction of The MDS Assessment revised 11/2019 revealed:5.1 Transmitting MDS data- All Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified nursing facilities or agents of those facilities must transmit required MDS data records to CMS. 5.2 Timeliness Criteria- completion timing. For all other comprehensive MDS assessments, Annual assessment updates. the completion may be no later than 14 days from the ARD. Upon a resident's entry, discharge to community, discharge to another facility or discharge deceased , a subset of items but be completed within 7 days of the Event Date.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Incontinence Care (Tag F0690)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were incontinent of bladder rece...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections and to restore continence to the extent possible for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #64) reviewed for incontinent care. 1. The facility failed to ensure CNA Z did not place the foley bag on the bed during foley catheter care for Resident #64. 2. The facility failed to ensure CNA G separated Resident #64's labia, cleaned the foley catheter insertion site and performed proper hand hygiene during foley care for Resident #64. These failures could place residents at risk for pain, infection, injury, and hospitalization. Findings included: Record review of Resident #64's face sheet dated 09/12/24 revealed she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #64 had diagnoses which included: dementia (loss of mental functions that affects daily life activities), hypertension (pressure in the blood vessels is always higher than normal), and fracture of part of neck of right femur (a break in the top of the thigh bone, just below the hip joint). Record review of Resident #64's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 10 of 15 which indicated moderately impaired cognition. Further review revealed the resident had a foley catheter. Record review of Resident #64's care plan initiated on 08/29/24 revealed resident noted with a foley catheter due to urinary retention and at risk for infection. Intervention: Keep tubing and bag below the bladder, and do not kink tubing. Record review of Resident #64's order listing report read in part .foley catheter care each shift, document output every shift for urinary retention start date 09/05/24 . During an observation on 09/11/24 at 1:16 p.m. of Resident #64, foley care provided by CNA G and CNA Z. CNA Z placed Resident #64's foley bag on the bed at the same level as the resident's bladder, from 1:20 p.m. to 1:38 p.m which had small amount yellow urine. CNA G wiped the resident's buttocks three times and when CNA G ran out of wipes, she opened another wipe packet and pulled wipes from the packet with the same gloves she had used to clean Resident #64's buttocks. CNA G did not separate the labia or clean the foley insertion site. CNA G did not hold the foley French( part of the tubing inserted into a resident ) when she cleaned it to prevent the foley French from pulling. During an interview on 09/11/24 at 1:50 p.m., CNA G said she thought she had changed her gloves before opening the clean wipe after she had wiped Resident #64's buttocks. CNA G said she should have changed her gloves when going from dirty to clean because of cross-contamination. CNA G said she thought she separated the labia and cleaned it. CNA G said if the labia were not separated, it may not be cleaned well, and it would be an infection control risk because the resident could get an infection. CNA G said CNA Z placed the Foley bag on the bed throughout care so they would not pull on the tube. CNA G said she did not secure the Foley when she cleaned the small tube, and she did not clean the insertion site because she did not separate the labia. CNA G said she had in-service on Foley care and was told not to place the Foley bag on the bed at the same level so that the urine would flow through gravity. CNA G said if the urine flowed back into Resident #64's bladder, the resident could get an infection. During an interview on 09/11/24 at 1:56 p.m., CNA Z said CNA G did not separate Resident #64's labia, and CNA G did not hold the tubing while she cleaned it to prevent the tubing from pulling. CNA Z said CNA G opened the clean wipes with the dirty gloves, but CNA G should have removed the dirty gloves, washed or sanitized her hands, and donned clean gloves before opening the wipe packet. During an interview on 09/11/24 at 2:00 p.m., CNA Z said she placed the Foley bag on the bed, but she should not have because the urine would flow back into Resident #64's bladder. CNA Z said Resident #64 could get a UTI. CNA Z said she had in-service and training on foley care. CNA Z said the nurse monitored the aide during rounding. During an interview on 09/12/24 at 12:00 p.m., the DON said Resident #64's foley bag should always be below the bladder for the urine to drain through gravity. The DON said the CNA should not have placed the foley bag on the bed at the bladder level because the urine would have flowed back into the bladder, and Resident #64 could have had an infection (UTI). The DON said CNA G should have separated Resident #64's labia and cleaned the insertion site, and if the labia was not appropriately cleaned, Resident #64 could also get an infection. The DON said CNA G should have held onto the French while she cleaned it to prevent it from pulling, which could hurt Resident #64. The DON said CNA G should have washed or sanitized her hands when she went from dirty to clean, and CNA G contaminated the clean wipes. Record review of the facility policy on hand hygiene dated 5/27/24 read in part . purpose . Effective hand hygiene removes transient microorganisms, dirt, and organic material from the hands and decreases the risk of cross contamination to patients, patient care equipment and the environment . policy statement . HCWs will perform hand hygiene following the guide for hand hygiene product use when: a. Entering and exiting patients' rooms. (This will be the measure of hand hygiene compliance.) b. Before donning sterile or non-sterile gloves c. Before performing invasive procedures or handling an invasive device. d. Before handling medications. f. After contact with body fluid or excretions, mucus membranes, non-intact skin or wound dressings whether or not gloves were worn. g. If moving from a contaminated body site to another body site during the care of the same patient. h. After contact with inanimate surfaces and objects in the patient room/care area. i. After removing sterile or non-sterile gloves. Record review of the facility isolation policy dated 11/16/21 read in part . statement #2. The use of transmission-based precaution is to prevent the spread of certain infectious agents, which required additional precautions beyond standard precautions . Record review of the facility policy on perineal care dated 09/12/24 read in part . purpose . the purpose of this procedure are to provide cleanliness and . to the resident, to prevent infection . procedure #6. For female resident . separate labia and clean downward from front to back . if the resident had an indwelling catheter, gently clean the juncture of the tubing from urethra down the catheter about 3 inches .
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pharmacy Services (Tag F0755)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident, for 1 ( Resident #1) of 7 residents and 2 (1A and 2 B medication cart) out of 4 [NAME] on carts reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure LVN A did not crush enteric coated aspirin during oral medication administration for Resident# 1. The facility failed to ensure station 1A medication cart did not contain three residents (Resident #114 midodrine 5 mg, Resident #6 dexamethasone 40mg, Resident #159 ondansetron 40mg) discontinued medications. The facility failed to ensure station 2B medication cart did not have 2 opened eyes drops which had expired, and one discontinued medication. These deficient practices could place residents at risk for adverse effects and not receiving the therapeutic effects of the medication. Findings include: 1.Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated [DATE] revealed he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included: stroke (loss of blood flow to part of the brain which damages brain tissue), traumatic brain dysfunction (brain injury caused by an external force such as a blow), and traumatic spinal dysfunction (permanent spinal cord damaged by physical trauma). Record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed on section C700 Resident #1 had memory problems. Further review revealed the resident needed extensive to dependent assistance with ADLs which required at least one staff assistance. Record review of Resident #1's care plan initiated on [DATE] revealed resident had an ADL self-care deficit related to inability to perform activities of daily living independently. Intervention: Requires assistance of staff. Record review of Resident #1's order listing report read in part . Aspirin Tablet Chewable Give 81 mg by time a day for DVT Prophylaxis patient is bed bound . Record review of Resident #1's MAR dated for [DATE] read in part . Aspirin Tablet Chewable Give 81 mg by mouth one time a day for DVT(blood cloth within a vein in the leg) Prophylaxis(prevent disease) patient is bed bound -Start Date- [DATE] . During an observation on [DATE] at 7:13 a.m., LVN A was about to crush 81 mg of enteric-coated aspirin when the surveyor intervened. During an interview on [DATE] at 3:54 p.m., LVN A said he was about to crush the enteric aspirin when the survey stopped him. LVN A said the medication was a delayed release, and Resident #1 would not get the right dose of the medication at the right time if he had crushed the medicine. LVN A said the DON and clinical manager monitored the nurses when they made Radom rounds. LVN A said he had training in medication administration. During an interview on [DATE] at 12:18 p.m., the DON said LVN A should not crush enteric-coated aspirin because it should be swallowed whole to protect Resident #1's stomach because of ulcer and bleeding, and she thought it would not do any harm to Resident #1, but enteric-coated aspirin should not be crushed. 2.During an observation of station 1A nurse cart and interview on [DATE] at 9:35 a.m., revealed the following discontinued medications: *Midodrine 5 mg-Resident #300 *Dexamethasone 40mg- Resident #6 *Ondansetron 40mg- Resident #159 RN A said she usually did not work from station 1A nurse cart. RN A said those medications were for Resident #114, Resident #159, and Resident #6, and they brought them from home. RN A said the facility did not use the medications the resident brought from home. RN A said nurses should put home medication in a zip lock bag and place it in the medication room, and the discharged nurse would give the medicines back to the residents during discharge. RN A said the nurse could have given the home medication in error if the nurse had left the medicines in the medication cart. During an interview on [DATE] at 12:43 p.m., the DON said if any resident brought medication to the facility, the nurses should put the medication in a zip-loc bag and place the medication in the medication room, and if it was a controlled medication, it should be locked up but not in the medication cart. The DON said home medications should not be in the cart because it could cause conflict; the dose from home could be different from the facility dose. 3.During an observation of section 2 B's nurse cart on [DATE] at 10:27 a.m., revealed two opened eye drop bottles, and the open date was [DATE]. There was a discontinued medication(dexamethasone 40 mg) in the cart, too. During an interview on [DATE] at 4:03 p.m., LVN A said the nurses should remove discontinued medications immediately and lock in the medication slot box in the medication room. LVN A said discontinued medication should be removed from the cart immediately to prevent medication errors. LVN A said the nurse was responsible for taking discontinued medication from the cart by the nurse who was on duty when the medication was discontinued. LVN A said he was trained on medication storage and discontinuing medication, and the clinical director mentors the nurses when he makes rounds. LVN A said the pharmacy and pharmacy tech checked the cart for discontinued and expired medication in the cart. During an interview on [DATE] at 4:10 p.m., LVN A said the two eye drops that were open and dated had expired, and the expiration date for the eye drops was 28 days to 30 days after opening. LVN A said if the resident was administered expired medication, it could cause more harm to the resident. During an interview on [DATE] at 12:27 p.m., the DON said the opened eye drops container should be disposed of 28 days after opening. The DON said the pharmacy technician checks the cart three times a week for expired medication. The DON said the expired medicines would not be effective if they were administered to the resident. During an interview on [DATE] at 12:41 p.m., The DON said the nurses should store discontinued medication in a locked compartment in the medication room. The DON said the nurses should immediately remove discontinued medications from the cart to prevent discrepancies. Record review of the facility medication and treatment order dated [DATE] read in part purpose . to ensure accurate, safe, and effective administration of prescribed medications . Record review of the facility crushed medications dated [DATE] read in part . purpose . medications shall be crushed only when it was appropriate and safe to do so, consistent with physician orders . Record review of the facility policy on medication labeling and storage dated [DATE] read in part . medication storage #3 . If the facility has discontinued, outdated or deteriorated medications or biologicals, it is quarantined for return or destruction of these items.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that drugs and biologicals used in the facilit...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that drugs and biologicals used in the facility were stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for 3 (station 1A, station 2A and station 2B) of 4 medication carts reviewed for medications storage. - LVN A left Station 2 A and station 2B medication carts unlocked on the hallway. - MA F left two medication containers on top of station 1A medication cart and went into a resident's room during medication administration. - MA F left station 1A medication cart unlocked on the hallway. These failures could affect residents, placing them at risk for ingesting unprescribed medication and hospitalization. The findings include: During an observation on 09/11/24 at 6:50 a.m., LVN A left the station 2A medication cart unlocked in front of room [ROOM NUMBER] and went to room [ROOM NUMBER]. LVN A returned to the medication cart, took medication from the cart, went into the resident's room, and administered medication while the cart was unlocked. During an observation on 09/11/24 at 6:58 a.m., LVN A left station 2 B's medication cart unlocked, went to the medication room, went into room [ROOM NUMBER], and administered medication to Resident #14. During an interview on 09/11/24 at 3:54 p.m., LVN A said he forgot to lock the station 2A medication cart and went into room [ROOM NUMBER]. LVN A said he did not lock the medication cart when he went to the medication room. LVN A said anybody could have gotten into the cart and taken any medication. LVN A said it was a safety issue because a resident could have taken medicines in his cart. LVN A said he also left station 2 B's medication cart unlocked when he went to room [ROOM NUMBER]. During an observation on 09/11/24 at 8:15 a.m., MA F left the station 1A cart unlocked in the hallway, went into a resident's room, and administered medication to the resident. During an interview on 09/11/24 at 5:31 p.m., MA F said station 1 A's medication cart should always be locked when it was not in use, or the medication aide was out of sight. MA F said if the cart was not locked, then staff or residents could get into the cart and take medication, and if the resident took the medication the resident was not supposed to take, it could harm the resident. During an interview on 09/12/24 at 12:23 p.m., the DON said MA F and LVN A should not have left the medication carts unlocked when not in use for safety to prevent anybody from getting into the cart and taking any medication. During an observation on 09/11/24 at 8:01 a.m., MA F left two bottles of medications on top of station 1A medication cart in the hallway and entered a resident's room. During an interview on 09/11/24 at 5:12 p.m., MA F said she left two medications on top of the medication cart. MA F said leaving medicines on top of the medication cart was not the appropriate thing to do when she was away from the cart because another resident could get into the medication cart, and if the resident had taken the medication, it could cause harm to the resident. During an interview on 09/12/24 at 12:25 p.m., the DON said MA F should not have left medications on top of the cart because it was a safety issue and it would be a medication error, and if any resident took the medication, the resident could have adverse effects. Record review of the facility policy on medication labeling and storage dated 09/12/24 read in part . purpose . the facility stores all medications and biologicals in locked compartments . #4 . Compartments (including, but not limited to, drawers, cabinets, rooms, refrigerators, carts, and boxes) containing medications and biologicals are locked when not in use, and trays or carts used to transport such items are not left unattended if open or otherwise potentially available to others .
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program d...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to prevent the development and transmission of infection for 2 of 6 staff (RN A, LVN A,) observed for infection control. 1. The facility failed to ensure RN A followed proper infection control and PPE procedure during ACCU - check(blood sugar check) for Resident #110. 2. The facility failed to ensure LVN A followed proper infection control and PPE procedure during IV medication administration for Resident #14. 3. The facility failed to ensure RN A followed proper infection control and PPE procedure during subcutaneous medication administration for Resident #113. These failures could place the residents at risk for infection. 1. Record review of Resident #110's face sheet dated 09/12/24 revealed he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #110 had diagnoses which included: closed fracture of two ribs (a break ribs where the skin remains intact). Record review of Resident #110's order listing report for September 2024 read in part .ACCU Checks before meals for DM2 Other active date 08/17/2024 . An observation on 09/12/24 at 6:32 a.m. revealed RN A removed the gloves, which she wore while she checked Resident #110's blood sugar, which had blood spots, donned another pair of gloves, and sanitized the glucometer. RN A did not sanitize or wash her hands after she checked Resident #110's blood sugar. During an interview on 09/11/24 at 4:44 p.m., RN A said she was supposed to sanitize her hands after she removed the dirty gloves, which she wore when she checked Resident #110's blood sugar. Then, she would have donned another glove, but she did not; it was an infection control issue. During an interview on 09/11/24 at 12:11 p.m., the DON said RN A should have sanitized her hands when she changed the dirty gloves after she checked Resident #110's blood sugar before she donned the clean gloves and wiped down the glucometer because it was an infection control issue. 2. Record review of Resident #14's face sheet dated 09/12/24 revealed he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Resident #14 had diagnoses which included: diabetes mellitus (the body cannot control the amount of sugar in the blood), hypertension (pressure in the blood vessels is always higher than normal), and heart failure (when heart is unable to pump enough oxygenated blood to meet the body's needs). Record review of Resident #14's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 13 of 15 which indicated intact cognition. Further review revealed the resident needed moderate to extensive assistance with ADL's which required at least one staff assistance. Record review of Resident #14's care plan initiated on 07/28/24 revealed resident had an ADL self-care deficit related to inability to perform activities of daily living independently. Intervention: Requires assistance of staff. Record review of Resident #14's clinical physician orders read in part . PICC/CENTRAL LINE: flush with 10 CC NS each shift before medication administration .order date 07/25/24 . meropenem intravenous solution reconstituted 500mg every 12 hours for osteomyelitis for 2 weeks start date 09/04/24 . During an observation on 09/11/24 at 6:52 a.m., LVN A administered IV meropenem 500 mg intravenously to Resident #14. LVN A went into the medication room and brought out the medication and the tubing and placed the medication at the nursing station. LVN A went to the medication cart, wrote the date on a sticker, and returned it to the nursing station counter. LVN A opened the plastic, which had the IV tubing, and placed the tubing on the counter that was not disinfected or had any barrier. LVN A went into Resident #14's room, was in the enhanced barrier precautions room because the sign on the door, and he did not don a gown and placed the medication on top of Resident #14's nightstand. The nightstand had Resident #1's personal care items (lotion, a cup, and paper towels). LVN A did not disinfect or place any barrier on the nightstand. LVN A was touching the outer uniform pockets, and he went into both uniform pockets with his gloved hands and said he was looking for his watch so he could write what time he started the IV. LVN A used the same gloves he touched his pocket for the entire care. During an interview on 09/11/24 at 3:42 p.m., LVN A said Resident #14 had a PICC line, and he should have followed enhanced infection control. LVN A said he placed the medication and tubing on the nursing station counter and wrote the date on the label. LVN A said he opened the tubing and placed the label on the tubing. LVN A said he should have prepped for the IV medication administration on a clean field to prevent cross-contamination. LVN A said he should not have placed the medication on the countertop or on top of Resident #14's nightstand because it was cross-contamination. LVN A said he should not have touched or put his gloved hands in the uniform pocket and continued administering medication to Resident #14 because of infection control, which he could have transferred his germs to the resident. LVN A said he should have donned the disposable gown because Resident #14 was on enhanced precaution. LVN A said he had in service on infection control, PPE, and hand washing, and the IP monitored nurses during rounding. During an interview on 09/12/24 at 12:02 p.m., the DON said LVN A should have donned the PPE when he went to provide care for Resident #14 in enhanced barrier isolation. The DON said the setup for IV medication should be a clean procedure and set up in the medication room or bedside. The DON said LVN A should have disinfected the nightstand before she placed the medication and opened the IV tubing on the nightstand to prevent cross-contamination. 3. Record review of Resident #113's face sheet dated 09/12/24 revealed he was an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #113 had diagnoses which included: closed right fracture of right femur (a break in the thigh bone where the skin remains intact). Record review of Resident #113's order listing report for September 2024 read in part .Heparin Sodium (Porcine) Solution 5000 UNIT/ML Pharmacy Inject 5000 unit subcutaneously every 12 hours for clotting prevention active date 09/08/2024 . During an Observation on 09/11/24 at 7:45 a.m., RN A sanitized her hands and knocked on Resident #113's door, then, she opened the door and placed the medication on Resident #113's bedside table. RN A went into the gloves box in the room by the entrance door and took gloves from the box. RN A donned gloves on her right hand, closed Resident #113's door with her left hand, and then donned the gloves on her left hand. RN A did not wash or sanitize her hands before she donned the gloves and provided a subcutaneous injection (injection under the fatty tissue) for Resident #113. During an interview on 9/11/24 at 5:00 p.m., RN A said she forgot to sanitize her hands before she donned the gloves when she entered Resident #113's room and administered Heparin Sodium (Porcine) Solution subcutaneously to Resident #113 and it was cross-contamination. RN A said she had in-service on infection control and the IP monitored nurses when she rounded. RN A said Resident #113 could get sick or even sent back to the hospital. During an interview on 09/11/24 at 12:16 p.m., the DON said RN A should have sanitized her hands before administering the Heparin Sodium (Porcine) Solution to Resident #113. The DON said it was an infection control issue because once RN A entered Resident #113's room, she should have washed or sanitized her hands. Record review of the facility policy on hand hygiene dated 5/27/24 read in part . purpose . Effective hand hygiene removes transient microorganisms, dirt, and organic material from the hands and decreases the risk of cross contamination to patients, patient care equipment and the environment . policy statement . HCWs will perform hand hygiene following the guide for hand hygiene product use when: a. Entering and exiting patients' rooms. (This will be the measure of hand hygiene compliance.) b. Before donning sterile or non-sterile gloves c. Before performing invasive procedures or handling an invasive device. d. Before handling medications. f. After contact with body fluid or excretions, mucus membranes, non-intact skin or wound dressings whether or not gloves were worn. g. If moving from a contaminated body site to another body site during the care of the same patient. h. After contact with inanimate surfaces and objects in the patient room/care area. i. After removing sterile or non-sterile gloves. Record review of the facility isolation policy dated 11/16/21 read in part . statement #2. The use of transmission-based precaution is to prevent the spread of certain infectious agents, which required additional precautions beyond standard precautions . Record review of the facility policy on infection control and isolation dated 05/27/24 read in part . the agency will implement measures to reduce the spread of and promote the prevention of infectious and communicable disease .
Aug 2024 4 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Abuse Prevention Policies (Tag F0607)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse and neglect of residents and ensure reporting of crimes occurring in federally-funded long-term care facilities for 2 of 11 residents (Residents #24 and #45) reviewed for abuse and neglect. 1. The facility failed to report Resident #24's allegations that on 5/11/24 CNA C touched her groin area without her permission. 2. The facility failed to report Resident #45's allegations that on 5/15/24 someone grabbed her hands and shoved her in bed during the night. This failure could place residents at risk for abuse and/or neglect. Findings included: Record review of the facility's Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation Policy published 10/03/2023 revealed that all Agency employees and contractors are required, and have the legal obligation to, report suspected abuse, neglect, and/or exploitation to the Texas Health and Human Services Department of Aging and Disability Services .If there is cause to believe abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a resident has occurred by a facility employee, representative, volunteer or contractor, the incident(s) will be reported to THHS and DADS as per state and federal regulatory requirement, upon witnessing the act or upon receipt of the allegation. 1. Record review of Resident #24's Face Sheet dated 08/21/24 revealed a [AGE] year-old who was originally admitted on [DATE] due to healing after a fracture of their third lumbar vertebra. Other medical diagnoses included: hypothyroidism (a condition where the thyroid gland does not produce enough hormones to effectively regulate a person's metabolism), Bipolar Disorder (a mental illness characterized by severe high and low moods and changes to sleep, energy, thinking and behavior; also called manic depression), and Lupus Erythematosus (an autoimmune disease that can affect many body systems, causing rashes, inflammation, fatigue and fever). Record review of Resident #24's care plan last reviewed on 5/9/24 revealed the following focus areas: -Resident #24 has a self-care deficit related to inability to perform activities of daily living independently, with interventions including allowing sufficient time for hygiene, encouraging Resident #24 to participate in hygiene and praise accomplishment as able, monitoring skin daily and weekly as needed, provide and observe resident's privacy and rights at all times. -Resident #24 is on Antidepressant medication related to Bipolar Disorder, with interventions including giving antidepressant medications ordered by physician and monitoring and documenting side effects and effectiveness, and monitoring, documenting, and reporting to the physician ongoing symptoms of depression such as being sad, irritable, crying, shame, suicidal ideations, fatigue, fear of being alone or with others, unrealistic fears, attention seeking, and anxiety. Record review of Resident #24's Comprehensive MDS (resident assessment tool) dated 04/29/2024 revealed a BIMS (brief interview measuring cognitive intactness) score of 14, indicating intact cognition. Further review revealed that Resident #24 was totally dependent on helper(s) for toileting hygiene. Record review of Resident #24's progress notes: - 05/11/2024 at 9:03pm, reflected LVN D wrote that she was notified by a CNA that Resident #24 refused care. Resident #24 told LVN D that she was fine and just didn't want anyone touching her crotch without her permission. - 5/12/24 at 8:15am, LVN C wrote that Resident #24 told her that last night she was upset with staff with inappropriate touching of her crotch and that she does not feel safe with the night shift that was on. Resident #24 also told her she felt safe at that time. -5/12/24 at 10:46am, the former DON wrote that the resident refused to be changed because she doesn't want anyone touching her in her peri area (resident referred to it as her crotch) without permission. Resident #24 expressed to the former DON that she was uncomfortable when the sheet was pulled back so she can be checked for incontinence. Record review of Resident #24's transfer form dated 05/12/2024 revealed she was transferred out of the facility for suicidal ideation. Further review revealed Resident #24 had no skin injuries and used a walker at the time of transfer. Record review of TULIP (portal where facilities report incidents to the state) on 08/19/2024 revealed no facility self-reports for Resident #24 or Resident #45's incidents. Observation of the facility on 8/21/2024 at 10:21am, revealed there was a sign posted in the front lobby listing the two Abuse Coordinators' contact information, who were the QS and interim Administrator. Interview with the CM on 8/23/24 at 10:38am, he said that Resident #24 complained about the incident the day after on 5/12/24 but that it was related to the can being too rough during incontinent care and that she preferred a nurse do it rather than a CNA. He denied that Resident #24 implied abuse. Interview with the QS on 8/23/24 at 11:07am, he said that his job responsibilities as Quality Patient Safety Specialist were to review incidents and accidents and reporting processes. He said the facility used an escalation algorithm to determine if an incident is reportable to the State, which included reviewing the allegation, interviewing relevant personnel, huddling with leaders in the Risk and Legal department and deciding from there to report or not. The QS said he did not remember the incident with Resident #24 and said he would have to defer to his notes. Later interview with the QS on 8/23/24 at 12:30pm, he could not find any documentation related to Resident #24's incident. Interview with the interim Administrator on 8/23/24 at 11:10am, interim Administrator said he started working in his current position in July 2024. He said he was not aware of Resident #24's incident. He said any allegations of abuse should be immediately reported to the HHSC. The Administrator said staff are to report any allegations of abuse to their charge nurse and then to the Abuse Coordinator. Interview with the VPO on 08/23/2024 at 11:34am, she said she did not remember Resident #24's incident. The VPO stated she is aware that allegations of abuse should be reported within a two-hour timeframe. Interview with the QD on 8/23/24 at 11:49am, she said if resident reports experiencing abuse, the facility does an internal investigation, and if the incident is determined reportable, that was when it is reported to the state. The QD said she did not remember Resident #24's incident but that based on the allegations the facility would have reported if they knew. Interview with the former DON on 8/23/24 at 3:02pm, she said she started working at the facility on 5/26/24 and never heard about Resident #24's incident. Interview with the former Administrator on 8/23/24 at 3:20pm, the former Administrator said and that they remembered Resident #24's incident. They said the facility decided the incident was not reportable due to Resident #24's diagnoses. She said the former DON, a former nurse, wrote a clarifying statement in Resident #24's nursing progress notes that left out the part of her allegation stating that someone touched her inappropriately. The facility said the resident was delusional and was having a psychotic episode. Attempted interview with CNA C on 08/20/2024 at 12:05pm, left a voicemail. Attempted interview with LVN D on 08/22/24 at 10:58 am, left a voicemail. Attempted interview with LVN C on 08/20/2024 at 12:03pm, left a voicemail. 2.Record review of Resident #45's face sheet dated 08/22/24 revealed she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #45 had diagnoses which included: atrial fibrillation (an irregular heartbeat), hypertension (when the pressure in your blood vessels is too high), gastroenteritis (inflammation of the stomach intestinal lining) and colitis (inflammation in the colon). Record review of Resident #45's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 13 of 15 which indicated intact cognition. Further review revealed the resident needed extensive assistance to total assistance with ADLs which required at least one staff assistance. Record review of Resident #45's care plan initiated on 03/29/24 revealed resident had an ADL self-care deficit related to inability to perform activities of daily living independently. Intervention: Requires assistance of staff. Record review of Resident #45's progress note dated 05/16/24wrote by RNA read in part .DON notified writer that patient has complains during therapy session today and wants writer to f/u. Writer interviewed patient and patient notified writer that someone had grabbed both her hands and shoved her in bed last night. Patient proceeded to show writer some bruises on her arms. She pointed to one bruise and said, this is old, but these ones were from yesterday from where I was grabbed, pointing to 2 different bruises. Patient stated Last night a young lady, came to my room, grabbed both my hands and shoved me in bed. I asked the young lady what you are doing? but she did not say anything. Head-to -toe assessment performed on patient. Patient alert and oriented X2-3 with some forgetfulness . Record review of Resident #45's progress note dated 5/16/24 wrote by RN A read in part . notified RP about incident and RP notified writer that she had called patient on Wednesday (05/15/24) morning around 9-10am, and patient had reported the incident to her that someone grabbed her hands and shoved her in bed during the night. RP said that she was waiting to bring it up during the care plan meeting on Friday. Administrator was notified . During an interview on 08/21/24 at 3:33 p.m., RT B said Resident #45 mentioned to him while she was in therapy that a staff grabbed her hand, and it was during transfer. RT B said he told the former DON and the former Administrator at the time. RT B said Resident #45 told him she was grabbed by the forearms and she had discoloration on her arms but was not sure if it was from the incident or not. RT B said the former DON came and assessed the resident, and she took the resident out of the gym and continued to check on Resident #45. During an interview on 08/23/24 at 10:53 a.m., CM said he did not remember any incident with Resident #45. CM said he would research it and notify the surveyor about his findings. During an interview on 08/23/2024 at 11:13 a.m., QS said he could not recall any incident about Resident #45. QS said he would investigate and get back to the surveyor. During an interview on 08/23/24 at 11:19 a.m., the Administrator said he must report to HHSC immediately and then start the investigation. The Administrator stated that if a staff member were identified in the incident, he would suspend the staff member while continuing the investigation. The Administrator said he would also notify Resident #45 physician and the responsible party. The Administrator said they would conduct quality of life and safety questions and in-service on abuse/neglect for the staff. The Administrator said he was unaware of the incident or allegation of abuse complaint by Resident #45 because he was not in the facility then. During an interview on 08/23/24 at 1134 a.m., VPO said she was not sure about Resident #45's alleged abuse, but she would research it and get back to the surveyor. Then, VPO said she thought there was an incident they did huddle about regarding Resident #45, but she was not sure. During an interview on 08/23/24 at 11:49 a.m., QD said she recalled she went and talked to Resident #45, and Resident #45 asked her to look at her arm, and she asked her to tell her how it happened. QD said that Resident #45 did not know how it had happened and that it was purple. QD said Resident #45 said if she bumped into anything, she would get bruised. QD said that the discolorations were not really bruises on Resident #45's arms because she was on a blood thinner, and she could bruise easily. QD said she did not interview RN A or RT B During an interview on 08/23/24 at 12:07 p.m., RN A said she was at the nursing station when the former DON came and told her that Resident #45 complained that somebody was rough with her. RN A said Resident #45 told her the incident happened during the night shift when she went and assessed Resident #45. RN A said Resident #45 told her a staff was rough and pulled her hand and pushed her into the bed, and Resident #45 had bruises on her arms. RN A said when she called Resident #45's family member to tell her about Resident #45's allegation of abuse, the family told her Resident #45 had already called and notified her that the staff had been rough with her a day before. RN A said she called the former Administrator and told her about the alleged abuse, and the former Administrator said she would investigate the allegation of abuse. During an interview on 08/23/24 at 12:30 p.m., QS came back and said he could not find any information about Resident #45's abuse allegation. During an interview on 08/23/24 at 12:44 p.m., VPO returned and said she could not find any information on Resident #45's incident. During an interview on 08/23/24 at 2:44 p.m., the former DON said she remembered; RT B told her Resident #45 complained she was grabbed and pushed into the bed. The former DON said Resident #45 told her a young girl about 16 or [AGE] years old pulled her hands a little harder when she was taking her to the restroom. The former DON said she saw Resident #45's hands and would not call it bruises because it was bleeding under the skin and appeared like purpura (when small blood vessels burst, and blood pools under the skin). The former DON said Resident #45 had it all over her arms and legs, but she pointed to some areas and said these happened last night when she pulled her hands. The former DON said when she reported to the VPO, she told her to stop the investigation and that the team would take over the investigation. During an interview on 08/23/24 at 3:22 p.m., the former Administrator said she heard that Resident #45 said somebody went into the room and grabbed her hands, and RN A did not report the alleged abuse to her but to the VPO. The former Administrator said RN A, who assessed Resident # 45, said she called to notify Resident #45's family member, and the family member said Resident #45 notified her early this week. The former Administrator said that as an administrator, whenever a resident alleged any abuse, it should be reported to HHSC, and then you should investigate.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, ne...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment were reported immediately to the State survey Agency in accordance with State law through established procedures for 2 of 11 residents (Residents #24 and #45) reviewed for abuse and neglect. 1. The facility failed to report Resident #24's allegations that on 5/11/24 CNA C touched her groin area without her permission. 2. The facility failed to report Resident #45's allegations that on 5/15/24 someone grabbed her hands and shoved her in bed during the night. This failure could place residents at risk for abuse and/or neglect. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #24's Face Sheet dated 08/21/24 revealed a [AGE] year-old who was originally admitted on [DATE] due to healing after a fracture of their third lumbar vertebra. Other medical diagnoses included: hypothyroidism (a condition where the thyroid gland does not produce enough hormones to effectively regulate a person's metabolism), Bipolar Disorder (a mental illness characterized by severe high and low moods and changes to sleep, energy, thinking and behavior; also called manic depression), and Lupus Erythematosus (an autoimmune disease that can affect many body systems, causing rashes, inflammation, fatigue and fever). Record review of Resident #24's care plan last reviewed on 5/9/24 revealed the following focus areas: -Resident #24 has a self-care deficit related to inability to perform activities of daily living independently, with interventions including allowing sufficient time for hygiene, encouraging Resident #24 to participate in hygiene and praise accomplishment as able, monitoring skin daily and weekly as needed, provide and observe resident's privacy and rights at all times. -Resident #24 is on Antidepressant medication related to Bipolar Disorder, with interventions including giving antidepressant medications ordered by physician and monitoring and documenting side effects and effectiveness, and monitoring, documenting, and reporting to the physician ongoing symptoms of depression such as being sad, irritable, crying, shame, suicidal ideations, fatigue, fear of being alone or with others, unrealistic fears, attention seeking, and anxiety. Record review of Resident #24's Comprehensive MDS (resident assessment tool) dated 04/29/2024 revealed a BIMS (brief interview measuring cognitive intactness) score of 14, indicating intact cognition. Further review revealed that Resident #24 was totally dependent on helper(s) for toileting hygiene. Record review of Resident #24's progress notes: -On 05/11/2024 at 9:03pm, reflected LVN D wrote that she was notified by a CNA that Resident #24 refused care. Resident #24 told LVN D that she was fine and just didn't want anyone touching her crotch without her permission. -On 5/12/24 at 8:15am , LVN C wrote that Resident #24 told her that last night she was upset with staff with inappropriate touching of her crotch and that she does not feel safe with the night shift that was on. Resident #24 also told her she felt safe at that time. -On 5/12/24 at 10:46am , FS Bthe former DON wrote that the resident refused to be changed because she doesn't want anyone touching her in her peri area (resident referred to it as her crotch) without permission. Resident #24 expressed to FS Bthe former DON that she was uncomfortable when the sheet was pulled back so she can be checked for incontinence. Record review of Resident #24's transfer form dated 05/12/2024 revealed she was transferred out of the facility for suicidal ideation. Further review revealed Resident #24 had no skin injuries and used a walker at the time of transfer. Record review of TULIP (portal where facilities report incidents to the state) on 08/19/2024 revealed no facility self-reports for Resident #24 or Resident #45's incidents. Observation of the facility on 8/21/2024 at 10:21am, revealed there was a sign was posted in the front lobby listing the two Abuse Coordinators' contact information, who were the QS and interim Administrator. Interview with the CM on 8/23/24 at 10:38am, he said that Resident #24 complained about the incident the day after on 5/12/24 but that it was related to the CNA being too rough during incontinent care and that she preferred a nurse do it rather than a CNA. The CM denied that Resident #24 implied abuse. The CM said the facility investigated the incident, but does not know the findings. Interview with the QS on 8/23/24 at 11:07am, he said that his job responsibilities as Quality Patient Safety Specialist was were to review incidents and accidents and reporting processes. He said the facility used an escalation algorithm to determine if an incident is reportable to the State, which included reviewing the allegation, interviewing relevant personnel, huddlinge with leaders in the Risk and Legal department and decidinge from there to report or not. When asked about the incident with Resident #24 , heThe QS said he did not remember itthe incident with Resident #24 and said he will would have to defer to his notes. Later the QSLater interview with the QS on 8/23/24 at 12:30pm, came back and said he could not find any documentation related to Resident #24's incident. Interview with the interim Administrator on 8/23/24 at 11:10am, he stated he started working in his current position in July 2024 . He said he was not aware of Resident #24's incident. He said any allegations of abuse should be immediately reported to the HHSC and then investigated. The Administrator said staff are not to report any allegations of abuse to their charge nurse and then to the Abuse Coordinator . Interview with the VPO on 08/23/2024 at 11:34am, she said she did not remember Resident #24's incident. The VPO stated she was aware that allegations of abuse should be reported within a two-hour timeframe . Interview with the QD on 8/23/24 at 11:49am, she said if a resident reportsresident reports abuse experiencing abuse, the facility does an internal investigation, and if the incident is determined reportable, that's that was when it is reported to the state. The QD said she did not remember Resident #24's incident but that based on the allegations the facility would have reported if they knew. Interview with the former DON on 8/23/24 at 3:02pm, she said she started working at the facility on 5/26/24 and never heard about Resident #24's incident. Interview with the the former Administrator on 8/23/24 at 3:20pm, the former Administrator said and that they remembered Resident #24's incident . They said the facility decided the incident was not reportable due to Resident #24's diagnoses. The former Administrator said that the former DON wrote a clarifying statement in Resident #24's nursing progress notes that left out the part of Resident #24's allegation stating that someone touched her inappropriately. The facility said the resident was delusional and was having a psychotic episode. Attempted interview with CNA C on 08/20/2024 at 12:05pm, left a voicemail. Attempted interview with LVN D on 08/22/24 at 10:58 a.m, left a voicemail. Attempted interview with LVN C on 08/20/2024 at 12:03pm, left a voicemail. 2.Record review of Resident #45's face sheet dated 08/22/24 revealed she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #45 had diagnoses which included: atrial fibrillation (an irregular heartbeat), hypertension (when the pressure in your blood vessels is too high), gastroenteritis (inflammation of the stomach intestinal lining) and colitis (inflammation in the colon). Record review of Resident #45's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 13 of 15 which indicated intact cognition. Further review revealed the resident needed extensive assistance to total assistance with ADLs which required at least one staff assistance. Record review of Resident #45's care plan initiated on 03/29/24 revealed resident had an ADL self-care deficit related to inability to perform activities of daily living independently. Intervention: Requires assistance of staff. Record review of Resident #45's progress note dated 05/16/24wrote by RNA read in part .DON notified writer that patient has complains during therapy session today and wants writer to f/u. Writer interviewed patient and patient notified writer that someone had grabbed both her hands and shoved her in bed last night. Patient proceeded to show writer some bruises on her arms. She pointed to one bruise and said, this is old, but these ones were from yesterday from where I was grabbed, pointing to 2 different bruises. Patient stated Last night a young lady, came to my room, grabbed both my hands and shoved me in bed. I asked the young lady what you are doing? but she did not say anything. Head-to -toe assessment performed on patient. Patient alert and oriented X2-3 with some forgetfulness . Record review of Resident #45's progress note dated 5/16/24 wrote by RN A read in part . notified RP about incident and RP notified writer that she had called patient on Wednesday (05/15/24) morning around 9-10am, and patient had reported the incident to her that someone grabbed her hands and shoved her in bed during the night. RP said that she was waiting to bring it up during the care plan meeting on Friday. Administrator was notified . During an interview on 08/21/24 at 3:33 p.m., RT B said Resident #45 mentioned to him while she was in therapy that a staff grabbed her hand, and it was during transfer. RT B said he told the former DON and the former Administrator at the time. RT B said Resident #45 told him she was grabbed by the forearms and she had discoloration on her arms but was not sure if it was from the incident or not. RT B said the former DON came and assessed the resident, and she took the resident out of the gym and continued to check on Resident #45. During an interview on 08/23/24 at 10:53 a.m., CM said he did not remember any incident with Resident #45. CM said he would research it and notify the surveyor about his findings. During an interview on 08/23/2024 at 11:13 a.m., QS said he could not recall any incident about Resident #45. QS said he would investigate and get back to the surveyor. During an interview on 08/23/24 at 11:19 a.m., the Administrator said he must report to HHSC immediately and then start the investigation. The Administrator stated that if a staff member were identified in the incident, he would suspend the staff member while continuing the investigation. The Administrator said he would also notify Resident #45 physician and the responsible party. The Administrator said they would conduct quality of life and safety questions and in-service on abuse/neglect for the staff. The Administrator said he was unaware of the incident or allegation of abuse complaint by Resident #45 because he was not in the facility then. During an interview on 08/23/24 at 1134 a.m., VPO said she was not sure about Resident #45's alleged abuse, but she would research it and get back to the surveyor. Then, VPO said she thought there was an incident they did huddle about regarding Resident #45, but she was not sure. During an interview on 08/23/24 at 11:49 a.m., QD said she recalled she went and talked to Resident #45, and Resident #45 asked her to look at her arm, and she asked her to tell her how it happened. QD said that Resident #45 did not know how it had happened and that it was purple. QD said Resident #45 said if she bumped into anything, she would get bruised. QD said that the discolorations were not really bruises on Resident #45's arms because she was on a blood thinner, and she could bruise easily. QD said she did not interview RN A or RT B During an interview on 08/23/24 at 12:07 p.m., RN A said she was at the nursing station when the former DON came and told her that Resident #45 complained that somebody was rough with her. RN A said Resident #45 told her the incident happened during the night shift when she went and assessed Resident #45. RN A said Resident #45 told her a staff was rough and pulled her hand and pushed her into the bed, and Resident #45 had bruises on her arms. RN A said when she called Resident #45's family member to tell her about Resident #45's allegation of abuse, the family told her Resident #45 had already called and notified her that the staff had been rough with her a day before. RN A said she called the former Administrator and told her about the alleged abuse, and the former Administrator said she would investigate the allegation of abuse. During an interview on 08/23/24 at 12:30 p.m., QS came back and said he could not find any information about Resident #45's abuse allegation. During an interview on 08/23/24 at 12:44 p.m., VPO returned and said she could not find any information on Resident #45's incident. During an interview on 08/23/24 at 2:44 p.m., the former DON said she remembered; RT B told her Resident #45 complained she was grabbed and pushed into the bed. The former DON said Resident #45 told her a young girl about 16 or [AGE] years old pulled her hands a little harder when she was taking her to the restroom. The former DON said she saw Resident #45's hands and would not call it bruises because it was bleeding under the skin and appeared like purpura (when small blood vessels burst, and blood pools under the skin). The former DON said Resident #45 had it all over her arms and legs, but she pointed to some areas and said these happened last night when she pulled her hands. The former DON said when she reported to the VPO, she told her to stop the investigation and that the team would take over the investigation. During an interview on 08/23/24 at 3:22 p.m., the former Administrator said she heard that Resident #45 said somebody went into the room and grabbed her hands, and RN A did not report the alleged abuse to her but to the VPO. The former Administrator said RN A, who assessed Resident # 45, said she called to notify Resident #45's family member, and the family member said Resident #45 notified her early this week. The former Administrator said that as an administrator, whenever a resident alleged any abuse, it should be reported to HHSC, and then you should investigate. Record review of the facility's Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation Policy published 10/03/2023 revealed that all Agency employees and contractors are required, and have the legal obligation to, report suspected abuse, neglect, and/or exploitation to the Texas Health and Human Services Department of Aging and Disability Services .If there is cause to believe abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a resident has occurred by a facility employee, representative, volunteer or contractor, the incident(s) will be reported to THHS and DADS as per state and federal regulatory requirement, upon witnessing the act or upon receipt of the allegation.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Investigate Abuse (Tag F0610)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to have evidence that all alleged violations of abuse are...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to have evidence that all alleged violations of abuse are thoroughly investigated and results of the investigation reported to the State Survey Agency within 5 working days of the incident for 2 of 11 (Residents #24 and #45) residents reviewed for Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation. 1.The facility failed to have evidence that Resident #24's allegations of CNA C touching her groin area without her permission was thoroughly investigated and findings reported. 2.The facility failed to have evidence Resident #45's allegations that on 5/15/24 someone grabbed her hands and shoved her in bed during the night was thoroughly investigated and findings reported. This failure could place residents at risk for abuse and/or neglect by not having their concerns and allegations of abuse thoroughly investigated and reported. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #24's Face Sheet dated 08/21/24 revealed a [AGE] year-old who was originally admitted on [DATE] due to healing after a fracture of their third lumbar vertebra. Other medical diagnoses included: hypothyroidism (a condition where the thyroid gland does not produce enough hormones to effectively regulate a person's metabolism), Bipolar Disorder (a mental illness characterized by severe high and low moods and changes to sleep, energy, thinking and behavior; also called manic depression), and Lupus Erythematosus (an autoimmune disease that can affect many body systems, causing rashes, inflammation, fatigue and fever). Record review of Resident #24's care plan last reviewed on 5/9/24 revealed the following focus areas: -Resident #24 has a self-care deficit related to inability to perform activities of daily living independently, with interventions including allowing sufficient time for hygiene, encouraging Resident #24 to participate in hygiene and praise accomplishment as able, monitoring skin daily and weekly as needed, provide and observe resident's privacy and rights at all times. -Resident #24 is on Antidepressant medication related to Bipolar Disorder, with interventions including giving antidepressant medications ordered by physician and monitoring and documenting side effects and effectiveness, and monitoring, documenting, and reporting to the physician ongoing symptoms of depression such as being sad, irritable, crying, shame, suicidal ideations, fatigue, fear of being alone or with others, unrealistic fears, attention seeking, and anxiety. Record review of Resident #24's Comprehensive MDS (resident assessment tool) dated 04/29/2024 revealed a BIMS (brief interview measuring cognitive intactness) score of 14, indicating intact cognition. Further review revealed that Resident #24 was totally dependent on helper(s) for toileting hygiene. Record review of Resident #24's progress notes: -On 05/11/2024 at 9:03pm, reflected LVN D wrote that she was notified by a CNA that Resident #24 refused care. Resident #24 told LVN D that she was fine and just didn't want anyone touching her crotch without her permission. -On 5/12/24 at 8:15am , LVN C wrote that Resident #24 told her that last night she was upset with staff with inappropriate touching of her crotch and that she does not feel safe with the night shift that was on. Resident #24 also told her she felt safe at that time. -On 5/12/24 at 10:46am , FS Bthe former DON wrote that the resident refused to be changed because she doesn't want anyone touching her in her peri area (resident referred to it as her crotch) without permission. Resident #24 expressed to FS Bthe former DON that she was uncomfortable when the sheet was pulled back so she can be checked for incontinence. Record review of Resident #24's transfer form dated 05/12/2024 revealed she was transferred out of the facility for suicidal ideation. Further review revealed Resident #24 had no skin injuries and used a walker at the time of transfer. Record review of TULIP (portal where facilities report incidents to the state) on 08/19/2024 revealed no facility self-reports for Resident #24 or Resident #45's incidents. Observation of the facility on 8/21/2024 at 10:21am, revealed there was a sign was posted in the front lobby listing the two Abuse Coordinators' contact information, who were the QS and interim Administrator. Interview with the CM on 8/23/24 at 10:38am, he said that Resident #24 complained about the incident the day after on 5/12/24 but that it was related to the CNA being too rough during incontinent care and that she preferred a nurse do it rather than a CNA. The CM denied that Resident #24 implied abuse. The CM said the facility investigated the incident, but does not know the findings. Interview with the QS on 8/23/24 at 11:07am, he said that his job responsibilities as Quality Patient Safety Specialist was were to review incidents and accidents and reporting processes. He said the facility used an escalation algorithm to determine if an incident is reportable to the State, which included reviewing the allegation, interviewing relevant personnel, huddlinge with leaders in the Risk and Legal department and decidinge from there to report or not. When asked about the incident with Resident #24 , heThe QS said he did not remember itthe incident with Resident #24 and said he will would have to defer to his notes. Later the QSLater interview with the QS on 8/23/24 at 12:30pm, came back and said he could not find any documentation related to Resident #24's incident. Interview with the interim Administrator on 8/23/24 at 11:10am, he stated he started working in his current position in July 2024 . He said he was not aware of Resident #24's incident. He said any allegations of abuse should be immediately reported to the HHSC and then investigated. The Administrator said staff are not to report any allegations of abuse to their charge nurse and then to the Abuse Coordinator . Interview with the VPO on 08/23/2024 at 11:34am, she said she did not remember Resident #24's incident. The VPO stated she was aware that allegations of abuse should be reported within a two-hour timeframe . Interview with the QD on 8/23/24 at 11:49am, she said if a resident reportsresident reports abuse experiencing abuse, the facility does an internal investigation, and if the incident is determined reportable, that's that was when it is reported to the state. The QD said she did not remember Resident #24's incident but that based on the allegations the facility would have reported if they knew. Interview with the former DON on 8/23/24 at 3:02pm, she said she started working at the facility on 5/26/24 and never heard about Resident #24's incident. Interview with the the former Administrator on 8/23/24 at 3:20pm, the former Administrator said and that they remembered Resident #24's incident . They said the facility decided the incident was not reportable due to Resident #24's diagnoses. The former Administrator said that the former DON wrote a clarifying statement in Resident #24's nursing progress notes that left out the part of Resident #24's allegation stating that someone touched her inappropriately. The facility said the resident was delusional and was having a psychotic episode. Attempted interview with CNA C on 08/20/2024 at 12:05pm, left a voicemail. Attempted interview with LVN D on 08/22/24 at 10:58 a.m, left a voicemail. Attempted interview with LVN C on 08/20/2024 at 12:03pm, left a voicemail. 2.Record review of Resident #45's face sheet dated 08/22/24 revealed she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #45 had diagnoses which included: atrial fibrillation (an irregular heartbeat), hypertension (when the pressure in your blood vessels is too high), gastroenteritis (inflammation of the stomach intestinal lining) and colitis (inflammation in the colon). Record review of Resident #45's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 13 of 15 which indicated intact cognition. Further review revealed the resident needed extensive assistance to total assistance with ADLs which required at least one staff assistance. Record review of Resident #45's care plan initiated on 03/29/24 revealed resident had an ADL self-care deficit related to inability to perform activities of daily living independently. Intervention: Requires assistance of staff. Record review of Resident #45's progress note dated 05/16/24wrote by RNA read in part .DON notified writer that patient has complains during therapy session today and wants writer to f/u. Writer interviewed patient and patient notified writer that someone had grabbed both her hands and shoved her in bed last night. Patient proceeded to show writer some bruises on her arms. She pointed to one bruise and said, this is old, but these ones were from yesterday from where I was grabbed, pointing to 2 different bruises. Patient stated Last night a young lady, came to my room, grabbed both my hands and shoved me in bed. I asked the young lady what you are doing? but she did not say anything. Head-to -toe assessment performed on patient. Patient alert and oriented X2-3 with some forgetfulness . Record review of Resident #45's progress note dated 5/16/24 wrote by RN A read in part . notified RP about incident and RP notified writer that she had called patient on Wednesday (05/15/24) morning around 9-10am, and patient had reported the incident to her that someone grabbed her hands and shoved her in bed during the night. RP said that she was waiting to bring it up during the care plan meeting on Friday. Administrator was notified . During an interview on 08/21/24 at 3:33 p.m., RT B said Resident #45 mentioned to him while she was in therapy that a staff grabbed her hand, and it was during transfer. RT B said he told the former DON and the former Administrator at the time. RT B said Resident #45 told him she was grabbed by the forearms and she had discoloration on her arms but was not sure if it was from the incident or not. RT B said the former DON came and assessed the resident, and she took the resident out of the gym and continued to check on Resident #45. During an interview on 08/23/24 at 10:53 a.m., CM said he did not remember any incident with Resident #45. CM said he would research it and notify the surveyor about his findings. During an interview on 08/23/2024 at 11:13 a.m., QS said he could not recall any incident about Resident #45. QS said he would investigate and get back to the surveyor. During an interview on 08/23/24 at 11:19 a.m., the Administrator said he must report to HHSC immediately and then start the investigation. The Administrator stated that if a staff member were identified in the incident, he would suspend the staff member while continuing the investigation. The Administrator said he would also notify Resident #45 physician and the responsible party. The Administrator said they would conduct quality of life and safety questions and in-service on abuse/neglect for the staff. The Administrator said he was unaware of the incident or allegation of abuse complaint by Resident #45 because he was not in the facility then. During an interview on 08/23/24 at 1134 a.m., VPO said she was not sure about Resident #45's alleged abuse, but she would research it and get back to the surveyor. Then, VPO said she thought there was an incident they did huddle about regarding Resident #45, but she was not sure. During an interview on 08/23/24 at 11:49 a.m., QD said she recalled she went and talked to Resident #45, and Resident #45 asked her to look at her arm, and she asked her to tell her how it happened. QD said that Resident #45 did not know how it had happened and that it was purple. QD said Resident #45 said if she bumped into anything, she would get bruised. QD said that the discolorations were not really bruises on Resident #45's arms because she was on a blood thinner, and she could bruise easily. QD said she did not interview RN A or RT B During an interview on 08/23/24 at 12:07 p.m., RN A said she was at the nursing station when the former DON came and told her that Resident #45 complained that somebody was rough with her. RN A said Resident #45 told her the incident happened during the night shift when she went and assessed Resident #45. RN A said Resident #45 told her a staff was rough and pulled her hand and pushed her into the bed, and Resident #45 had bruises on her arms. RN A said when she called Resident #45's family member to tell her about Resident #45's allegation of abuse, the family told her Resident #45 had already called and notified her that the staff had been rough with her a day before. RN A said she called the former Administrator and told her about the alleged abuse, and the former Administrator said she would investigate the allegation of abuse. During an interview on 08/23/24 at 12:30 p.m., QS came back and said he could not find any information about Resident #45's abuse allegation. During an interview on 08/23/24 at 12:44 p.m., VPO returned and said she could not find any information on Resident #45's incident. During an interview on 08/23/24 at 2:44 p.m., the former DON said she remembered; RT B told her Resident #45 complained she was grabbed and pushed into the bed. The former DON said Resident #45 told her a young girl about 16 or [AGE] years old pulled her hands a little harder when she was taking her to the restroom. The former DON said she saw Resident #45's hands and would not call it bruises because it was bleeding under the skin and appeared like purpura (when small blood vessels burst, and blood pools under the skin). The former DON said Resident #45 had it all over her arms and legs, but she pointed to some areas and said these happened last night when she pulled her hands. The former DON said when she reported to the VPO, she told her to stop the investigation and that the team would take over the investigation. During an interview on 08/23/24 at 3:22 p.m., the former Administrator said she heard that Resident #45 said somebody went into the room and grabbed her hands, and RN A did not report the alleged abuse to her but to the VPO. The former Administrator said RN A, who assessed Resident # 45, said she called to notify Resident #45's family member, and the family member said Resident #45 notified her early this week. The former Administrator said that as an administrator, whenever a resident alleged any abuse, it should be reported to HHSC, and then you should investigate. Record review of the facility's Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation Policy published 10/03/2023 revealed that all Agency employees and contractors are required, and have the legal obligation to, report suspected abuse, neglect, and/or exploitation to the Texas Health and Human Services Department of Aging and Disability Services .If there is cause to believe abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a resident has occurred by a facility employee, representative, volunteer or contractor, the incident(s) will be reported to THHS and DADS as per state and federal regulatory requirement, upon witnessing the act or upon receipt of the allegation.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pharmacy Services (Tag F0755)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure t...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident, for 2 (Residents #47, #12) of 4 residents reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure Resident #47, Procrit was available for administration according to the physician. The facility failed to ensure Resident #12 Paxlovid was available from administration according to the physician's order. This deficient practice could place residents at risk for adverse effects and not receiving the therapeutic effects of the medication. Findings include: Record review of Resident #47's face sheet dated 08/21/24 revealed she was an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #47 had diagnoses which included: atrial fibrillation (an irregular heartbeat), anemia (did not have normal amount of red blood cells), and chronic kidney disease stage 5 (kidneys are getting very close to failure or have already failed). Record review of Resident #47's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 15 of 15 which indicated intact cognition. Further review revealed the resident needed moderate to extensive assistance with ADLs which required at least one staff assistance. Record review of Resident #47's care plan initiated on 06/26/24 revealed resident had an ADL self-care deficit related to inability to perform activities of daily living independently. Intervention: Requires assistance of staff. Record review of Resident #47's clinical physician orders read in part . Epoetin Alfa Injection Solution 10000 UNIT/ML (Epoetin Alfa) Inject 10000 unit subcutaneously one time a day every Wed, Thu for anemia Pharmacy Discontinued 7/24/2024 08:00 7/24/2024 ordered 7/23/2024 . Record review of Resident #47's MAR dated July 2024 read . Epoetin Alfa Injection Solution 10000 UNIT/ML (Epoetin Alfa) Inject 10000 unit subcutaneously one time a day every Wed, Thu for anemia -Start Date- 07/24/2024 0800 -DIC Date-)7/24/2024 2020 . Record review of LVN B statement dated 08/01/24 read in part . Resident #47 requested for the Epoetin injection and NP B was notified and she gave for the epoetin on 07/23/24 to be administered once a week. When the medication was not delivered she called the pharmacy on 07/24/24 and the pharmacy request Resident #47's lab and it was faxed to the pharmacy on 07/24/24. The medication was not delivered on 07/24/24,then she called the pharmacy on 07/25/24 and she was told the medication was a high cost medication and a form would have been faxed over to the facility to be filled out before the medication could be sent to the facility. LVN B wrote she checked the fax machine and she did not see the form and she notified the night nurse . During an interview on 08/21/24 at 1:08 p.m., the Administrator said Resident #47's physician gave the order for Procrit (Epoetin alfa), and it was supposed to come on the next run(the next delivery after the medication had been sent to the pharmacy), but it did not because it was a high-cost medication. LVN B did not escalate to the next level supervisor when the medication did not arrive from the pharmacy. The Administrator said LVN B did not escalate to the DON and him after she called the pharmacy when she did not receive the preauthorization form for high-cost medications, and it delayed the delivery of the medicines for Resident #47 and the medication was not delivered until seven days later, but Resident #47 did not miss any dose. The Administrator said that when he was made aware of the incident on 07/29/24(Resident #47 medication had not been delivered), he became involved and signed the preauthorization form. The Administrator said the facility had taken corrective action because they had increased the money for high-cost medications from $500 to $5000. The Administrator said the incidents had been QAPIED, and in services, the nurses and the management team met with the pharmacy company. During an interview on 08/21/24 at 2:21 p.m., NP B said Resident #47 went to the renal doctor, who told her to start on Procrit injection. NP B said she called Resident #47's nephrologist for the medication order, and she did not send the order. NP B said when the nephrologist did not return her call or send the order, she ordered the Procrit. NP B said the facility notified her, but she did not know what day the facility notified her. NP B said the facility told her they had not received the medication from the pharmacy. NP B said she did not remember ordering the medication to be given on 07/24 and then continuing every week because she was responding from memory. During an interview on 08/21/24 at 2:30 p.m., FP A said the medication for Resident #47 was not ordered as a stat(without delay) order because the medication takes about a week to two weeks to start working. FP A said Resident #47 was in a hemodynamics emergency(when the blood flow is unstable); she would have been sent to the hospital for blood transfusions. FP A read Resident #47's hemoglobin from the lab website: 07/22 was 7.2 at the hospital, and she was sent back to the facility; on 07/25/24, it was 6.3, and on 7/29/24, it was 6.9(the numbers for the hemoglobin in the blood and it is a protein in the red blood cells that carries oxygen throughout the body and returns carbon dioxide to the lungs). FP A said the facility notified him that Resident #47's Procrit was not delivered on time, and they had QAPI. FP A stated the facility had put other actions in place, and the nurses were in serviced. During an interview on 08/22/24 at 9:19 a.m., the CM said the facility did a cart audit, and the pharmacy technician did it, and the audit was done daily. The MC said he was the person who called the pharmacy to send Procrit for Resident #47 when he became aware of the high dollar cost of the medication. The CM said he was the person who notified the administrator, and the administrator signed the preauthorization form for Resident #47's Procrit. The CM said the action plan was done for Resident #47's medication; only the nurses were in serviced on the escalation process about medications not being available due to high cost, and the threshold was increased to $5000.00. The CM said he monitored the medication daily for both new admissions and newly prescribed medication. The CM said there was a hiccup on how to get high-threshold medicines, and they had talked to the pharmacy about it. The pharmacy said they are retraining their staff. The CM said the Procrit was ordered on 07/23/24, and the pharmacy said it was a high-cost dollar medication and needed a preauthorization form, and they requested Resident #47's lab, too. The CM stated that the pharmacy had faxed the preauthorization form. The nurse kept communicating with the pharmacy that they did not receive the form for authorization. The CM said the nurse failed to escalate to the next level of management until the seventh day, when he became aware the pharmacy did not deliver the medication and took care of it. During an interview on 08/22/24 at 10:37 a.m., LVN B said she did not have anything to add to the statement she wrote. LVN B said the pharmacy asked her to fax Resident #47's lab, and she faxed it, and they told her it was a high-cost medication. LVN B said the pharmacy said they would send a form for the facility to fill out, and she got busy and forgot, but she checked the fax later, and apparently, the pharmacy did not send the form. LVN B said she called the pharmacy back, and still no form. LVN B said she did not know when to escalate to the DON, maybe within 2 hours, and she did not because she was busy taking care of the residents. LVN B said she had no in-service about reporting if the medication was not delivered or escalated to the next-level manager. LVN B said Resident #47 could have had a negative outcome because it took a long time for the injections to come. During an interview on 08/22/24 at 2:56 p.m., RP A said he was contacted by the facility when the pharmacy delayed the delivery of the Procrit for about a week. RP A stated there were a couple of things that caused the delay: the dispensing pharmacy needed to know Resident #47's hemoglobin and if the resident was a dialysis resident, and the medication was a high-cost medication and needed the facility to sign the authorization form and that was how the medication was delayed. RP A said the pharmacy made several attempts to get Resident #47's information and signed the preauthorization form. RP A said LVN B was communicating with the pharmacy, and the pharmacy said they had the fax number and how many times they reached out to the facility, but LVN B did not escalate to the next level supervisor, which caused the delay for the medication to be delivered. RP A said the facility had taken some steps to prevent this incident from happening again by increasing the high-cost medication from $500 to $5000. RP A said the break he saw in this incident was a break in the escalation to the next-level supervisor. During a telephone interview on 08/22/24 at 3:26 p.m., RP B said the pharmacy first received the medication for Resident #47 on 07/23/24 at 1:59 p.m., Procrit 10000unit SUB Q, one time a day Wednesday, every Thursday. RP B said to fill the medication, the insurance required Resident #47's hemoglobin level and if the resident was on dialysis. RP B said there was no billing information when the pharmacy received the order, and it went into limbo, which was the pharmacy's mistake. On 07/24/24 at 10:10 a.m., the pharmacy tried contacting the facility about Resident #47's dialysis status. It was told to the pharmacy that Resident #47 was not on dialysis at 11:10 a.m., then they sent out the form at 11:11 a.m., 11:45 a.m., 12:46 p.m., the same day, again at 4:17 p.m., and the pharmacy did not receive the form back from the facility. RP B said the next day (07/25/24), the billing department sent out another form at 9:41 a.m. and 9:48 a.m., and the facility did not respond. Then, on 09/29/24 at 2:29 p.m., they received the form from LVN C the pharmacy did not have Procrit, and they had to get approval for Epogen, so they called the facility at 4:18 p.m., and told LVN C that they have the medication and the medication was sent out to the facility stat(quickly) at 4:51 p.m. RP B said since then, they had received the phone numbers for all the supervisors up to the VP to communicate so that the mistake would not be repeated. RP B said the facility's mistake was they did not understand the contract(the agreement between the facility and the pharmacy on high cost medication) the facility signed in 2015. During an interview on 08/22/24 at 5:36 p.m., with VPO, QD, and the Administrator, VPO said they had QAIP for the incidents and identified the RCA, and each area was assigned to individuals that would work on it and the time frame. VPO said the root cause was the nurses did not escalate when medication was not delivered. The, following was put in place: staff education on a time frame for medication being obtained and coordinating medication procurement. QD said the training is ongoing, and they had trained about 90% of the staff, and it was done in the facility and online. VPO said they had a meeting with the pharmacy company and increased the threshold from $ 500 to $5000. VPO said they implemented the improvement plan in relation to escalation (PIP). VPO said the pharmacy would call the facility within 30 minutes of receiving the script, the nurse would review missing medication during shift change, and it would be discussed during stand-up meetings. VPO said the missed medication would be assessed to a department head (DON or Clinical manager) to follow up with missed medications. VPO said the clinical manager would go and talk to the nurse to see if the medication was missed, if the physician and family were notified, and if it was truly missed or a documentation error. VPO said the facility started to run missed medication report daily after the incidents to avoid missed medication because the medication was expensive. During an interview on 08/22/24 at 6:14 p.m., QD said she believed the break happened when LVN B was waiting for the fax to come over, and that was the biggest barrier. QD said LVN B should have escalated the incident when the medication did not come. QD said there was no negative outcome for Resident #47. QD said LVN B did not attend the in-service because she had not worked since the incident. During an interview on 08/22/24 at 6:22 p.m., the VPO said the problem was escalation from LVN B. Now, the nurses have been instructed to escalate to the next-level supervisor if any medication is not delivered on the next medication run. The pharmacy has the phone numbers of all department heads and an email. The VPO said the pharmacy has to email any fax information, and the management will review and follow up on the communication. Record review of Resident #12's face sheet dated 08/21/24 revealed she was an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #12 had diagnoses which included: fracture neck of left femur (top part of the leg bone is broken just below the ball and socket joint), COVID 19 (highly contagious respiratory disease cause by the SARS (CoV -2 virus), and hypertension (the pressure in the blood vessels is high). Record review of Resident #12's admission MDS assessment dated 06/2024 revealed a BIMS score of 15 of 15 which indicated intact cognition. Further review revealed the resident needed moderate to extensive assistance with ADL's which required at least one staff assistance. Record review of Resident #12's care plan initiated on 07/28/24 revealed resident requires care and isolation due to the covid 19. Intervention: Staff to administer medication as ordered and monitor for effectiveness Record review of Resident #12's clinical physician orders read in part . Paxlovid (150/100)oral tablets therapy packet 10x150mg give 2 tablet by mouth two times a day for 5 days .order date 07/27/24 Record review of Resident #12's MAR dated July 2024 read Paxlovid (150/100) Oral Tablet Therapy pack 10 x 150 MG & 10 x 100MG, Give 2 tablet by mouth two times a day for COVID for 5 Days. start date 07/27/24, discontinued 07/29/24 . it also revealed the medication was not administered to Resident # 12 until it was discontinued on 07/29/24. Record review of Resident #12's progress note dated 07/25/24 by FP B read in part .Improving - New acute weakness today - Concerning for infection - Stat CBC, CMP, covid test . During an interview on 08/21/24 at 1:08 p.m., the Administrator said the hiccup about the COVID medication for Resident #12 was the 3-day window was missed because the medication was not delivered on time because it was high cost and the nurse did not escalate to the next level supervisor timely. The Administrator said Resident #12 could have had a negative outcome because the medication was not administered as ordered. During an interview on 08/21/24 at 4:49 p.m., CM said Resident #12's Paxlovid was ordered on the weekend(07/27/24), and the pharmacy said that it was a high-dollar medication and it needed preauthorization. CM said three nurses documented that they were following up with the pharmacy. LVN C notified him at some time on 07/28/24, and he told LVN C to notify the administrator. CM said the effectiveness of the medication would be most beneficial if the medication was given within the first five days of signs and symptoms of COVID to decrease the negative effects of COVID, such as SOB and muscle ache, and prevent a resident from becoming very sick. CM said there could be a negative outcome because the S/S would been prolonged. CM said when the medication was approved, it had been more than 5 days, and the doctor discontinued it because it had passed the 5-day window. CM said Resident #12 had a fever on Wednesday(07/24/24). CM then said Resident #12 had S/S on either Tuesday or Wednesday, and they did a PCR(polymerase chain reaction) test, which was sent to the hospital, and the hospital said they lost the PCR test.CM said the test was repeated on Friday, and it was positive on Saturday; CM said FP B ordered the COVID medication on a Saturday and was not filled until Monday (07/29/24), but FP B discontinued the medication because the window had passed. During an interview on 08/21/24 at 5:18 p.m., FP B said she saw Resident #12 on 07/25/24, and Resident #12 said she was coughing, and everybody was coughing, and she ordered stat CBC and COVID test. FP B said she called the facility on Friday (07/26/24) and was told the lab lost the COVID test. She ordered another COVID test, and the result came back positive. FP B said the on-call doctor gave the order for Paxlovid. FP B said she was not aware Resident #12 had not started on the medication because the facility could not get it because it was a high-cost medication until she came to the facility around 2:00 p.m. on 07/29/24. FP B said even if the facility told the night on-call physician on 07/28/24, she gave the order to hold the medication. FP B said it did not mean the facility should not have the medication delivered to the facility. FP B said the facility got the medication late on Monday(07/29/24), and she gave an order not to administer it because the facility did not get the medication within the window where it would be beneficial for Resident #12. FP B said Resident #12 could have had a blood clot because her medication was not administered, and she was in pain, and Resident #12 had comorbidities that predisposed her to more negative outcomes. During a telephone interview on 08/22/24 at 3:26 p.m., RP B said the physician transmitted the order for Paxlovid to the pharmacy on 07/27/24 at 10:02 a.m. RP B said the medication was put into the system at 10:04 a.m., cost $1500, and was no longer covered by the government. RP B said the facility was notified about the Paxlovid application for the assistant program on 07/27/24 at 5:52 p.m. RP B said the assistant program held the medication approval for about a day and a half before they responded that it was not approved on 07/28/24 at 12:48 p.m. RP B said the facility was notified at the same time that the medication was pending for approval. RP B stated that the medication was not approved again on 07/29/24 at 10:30 a.m. Then the facility said they had obtained it from another pharmacy, and LVN C canceled(told the pharmacy not to deliver the medication) around 4:10 p.m. RP B stated the facility had changed the threshold from $500 to $5000. During an interview on 08/22/24 at 9:19 a.m., CM said Resident #12's Paxlovid medication happened about the same time as Resident #47's Procrit, and it was he who notified the administrator on 07/29/24 that resident #47 and Resident #12 had not received their medications because it was a high cost medication and the authorization had not been sighed. CM said the nurses were trained and in serviced on escalation and pre authorization , before the incident and after both incidents. During an interview on 08/21/24, 08/22/24, and 08/23/24 between 12:07 p.m. and 4:11 p.m., LVN A, RN D, RN F, RN A, and MA O said they had an in-service on how to escalate to the next supervisor if any medication was not delivered with the next medication run and the medication was not in the E kit(emergency medication kit). They said if medication required authorization, they had to escalate to the next level supervisor and continue communication between the pharmacy and supervisor. Record review of facility policy on medication and treatment order dated 12/15/23 read in part . to ensure accurate, safe, and effective administration of prescribed medications . It further read, all orders for medications must include all the elements of a complete and clear medication order, including start and stop date, dosage and frequency of administration .
Aug 2023 16 deficiencies 9 IJ (9 affecting multiple)
CRITICAL (K) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Notification of Changes (Tag F0580)

Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to immediately inform the resident, consult with the resident's physici...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to immediately inform the resident, consult with the resident's physician; and notify, consistent with his or her authority the resident representative when there was a change in condition for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #238) reviewed for change of condition. - RN C failed to read Resident #238's x-ray results and failed to notify/consult the provider about the resident's femur fracture and change of condition using the facility's approved notification methods leaving Resident #238 in an undiagnosed/untreated fracture and in pain for 6 days (07/28/23 to 08/03/23). - The facility failed to immediately notify Resident #238's family of a fall on 07/23/23 and a second fall on 07/28/23 that resulted in an injury. On 08/07/23 at 05:02 PM an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified. While the IJ was removed on 08/15/23 at 03:48 PM, the facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of actual harm and a scope of pattern due to the facility continuing to monitor the implementation and effectiveness of their plan of removal These failure could place residents who required radiology services at risk for delayed identification and treatment of undiagnosed illnesses, hospitalization, pain, suffering and death. Findings included: Record review of Resident #238's Face Sheet date 08/11/23 revealed, a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included; type 2 diabetes, UTI, unspecified fall and back fracture. The resident transferred to an acute care facility on 08/03/23. Record review of Resident #238's admission MDS dated [DATE] revealed, intact cognition as indicated by a BIMS score of 15 out of 15. Record review of Resident #238's Baseline Care Plan dated 07/21/23 revealed, the resident planned to return to her own home following rehabilitation, one person physical assist with most ADLs, always continent of both bladder and bowel, and a history of falls. Record review of Resident #238's Accident/Incident Report dated 07/23/23 signed by LVN A revealed, the resident was found on the floor of the restroom besides the toilet. Record review of Resident #238's Progress Notes dated 07/23/23 at 05:18 AM signed by LVN A revealed, the resident was found on the bathroom floor and reported her butt and back really hurt. Record review of Resident #238's Care Plan Conference Summary dated 07/25/23 revealed Family Member #1 and Family Member #2 attended the meeting and there was not documented evidence Resident #238's fall that occurred on 07/23/23 was discussed in the care plan meeting. Record review of Resident #238's Accident/Incident Report dated 07/28/23 signed by LVN A revealed, the resident was found on the floor screaming in pain. Resident #238 could not remember how she got to the floor. The nurse attempted to notify the resident's family about the fall but she did not receive an answer. There was no documentation of a message being left. Record review of Resident #238's Progress Notes dated 07/23/23 at 05:18 AM signed by LVN A revealed, the resident was found on the bathroom floor and reported her butt and back really hurt. The resident was assessed for new injuries and none were discovered. The resident reported pain at 9 out of 10 and NP A gave an order for Acetaminophen 500 mg to be administered for pain. Record review of Resident #238's Progress Notes dated 07/28/23 at 05:38 AM signed by LVN A revealed, Resident #238 was found lying on the floor near her walker and the vacant bed. Resident #238 was screaming in pain and was assisted into a chair by staff members and the resident complained of left leg and hip pain. NP A w and as notified and she gave orders for a STAT xray and administration of Acetaminophen. There was no documented notification of the fall to Resident #238's family. Record review of Resident #238's Progress Notes dated 07/28/23 at 3:09 PM signed by RN C revealed, Resident #238 complained of pain to right thigh/leg and then complained about severe pain to left thigh and leg. The resident was seen by the NP and new orders were given for Tramadol (pain medication) and labs. The xray tech reported Resident #238 was not cooperative during the first xray so the patient had to be taken to the xray department. Record review of Resident #238's Xray Final Report printed on 07/28/23 at 05:33 PM revealed, Xray left femur- left femur intertrochanteric (where the leg bone meets the hip bone) fracture. Record review of text conversation between RN C and NP A dated 07/28/23 revealed, RN C sent pictures to NP A of Resident #238's xray report that indicated a left femur fracture at 06:24 AM. At 07/28/23 a 06:38 PM NP A responded back with looks normal. Record review of Resident #238's Progress Notes from 07/28/23 to 08/02/23 revealed, no documentation of the resident's xray finding of left femur fracture and no documented notification to the physician of the pending xray results. Record review of Resident #238's OT Daily note dated 07/31/23 revealed, Resident #238 refused to get out of the room to do therapy in the gym. The resident reported pain to her left leg 9/10 on the pain scale. Resident #238 refused to do any standing exercises or activities and was highly sensitive with lower extremity movement. There was no documentation of the resident having a fracture. Record review of Resident #238's OT Daily note dated 08/01/23 revealed, Resident #238 continued to report pain to her left leg at 9/10 on the pain scale. Any slight movement intensifies pain. Increased lower extremity swelling and pain to the left leg restricts movement. There was no documentation of the resident having a fracture. Record review of Resident #238's OT Daily note dated 08/02/23 revealed, Resident #238 refused to do any standing or lower extremities exercises/movement. The resident was agreeable to perform upper extremity exercises. Resident #238 refused to do toilet training and upper body/lower-body ADLs due to her pain being unbearable. The resident said it's worse than having a baby. There was no documentation of the resident having a fracture. Record review of Resident #238's PT Daily note dated 08/02/23 revealed, patient unable to move lower left extremity due to increase pain. Patient unable to stand due to increase pain in left hip and knee. Resident #238 stated 9/10 pain on left hip, knee, and below knee nursing notified about the pain. There was no documentation of the resident having a fracture. Record review of Resident #238's Physician Notes dated 08/02/23 revealed, Resident #238 had edema (swelling) to left lower leg and reported pain when examined. Ongoing edema with the pain, concerned about bone/soft tissue involvement, requested a stat x-ray but resident declined. Resident continues to report pain to the left leg but phone call, previous x-ray was negative. The note was signed by NP A on 08/08/23 at 12:00 AM. Record review of Resident #238's Physician Notes dated 08/03/23 revealed, X-ray reviewed showed left hip fracture, Resident #238 continued to have pain and had difficulty putting weight on the left leg. The resident was on tramadol and ibuprofen on an alternating schedule with no benefits. The note was signed by MD A on 08/06/23 at 3:07 PM. In an interview on 08/07/23 at 12:36 PM, MD A said Identification of Resident #238's femur fracture from 07/28/23 was missed from top to bottom. She said once the fracture was identified on 08/03/23 the resident was sent out to the hospital immediately because the facility cannot manage a hip fracture without first receiving an orthopedic consult. MD A said NP A was responsible for receiving the xray results from 07/28/23 and was managing the patient with Tramadol and Ibuprofen scheduled every 6 hours. In an interview on 08/07/23 at 12:50 PM, NP A said Resident #238. NP A said on Friday 07/28/23 she received a call saying Resident #238's x rays were negative for fracture and she did not receive a second call notifying her of the fracture. She said during her clinical assessment the resident presented with a swollen leg which was suspicious for a fracture and was also experiencing a decline in function and increased pain. NP A said when a provider places an order for an Xray, nursing staff are expected to enter the orders and once the test are completed notification must be provided to the NP/MD by phone notification. In an interview on 08/07/23 at 02:06 PM, the Therapy Manager said upon admission Resident #238 was not bad but she sustained a fall on 07/28/23 which led to a drastic change in function. He said Resident #238 went from just requiring supervision with ADLs/ambulation at admission to requiring 2 people maximum assistance following the fall, and the resident reported pain on a scale from 06-9 with movement. In an interview on 08/07/23 at 5:34 PM, the DON said after Resident #238's fall on 07/28/23 the resident received 2 xray results but there was no order entered for the 2nd xray so she couldn't track it. She said all xray results should be reviewed by the nurse and the physician should be notified via a phone call of the findings. The DON said failure to identify xray results timely could result in a delay in treatment, the resident developing a clot from the fracture and uncontrolled pain. In an interview on 08/09/23 at 09:16 AM, RN C said that during the week of 07/28/23 Resident #238 complained of pain in her thighs and legs. She said earlier in the morning of 07/28/23 an x-ray tech came to the resident's room to perform an x-ray of Resident #238's hips but the resident wasn't cooperative so a CNA had to assist the x-ray tech. RN C said since the resident was non-complaint during the previous x-ray the resident had to be taken to the hospital on the evening of 07/28/23. She said when the results came back, she took pictures of the x-ray results and sent it to NP A who reviewed the results and said everything was ok. RN C said she never read the x-ray results and only relied on the assessment given by NP A. RN C said the facility policy was that all nurses were expected to read the results and then notify the provider of the findings. She said she was not supposed to send pictures of the results to NP A but she was busy so she just sent pictures of the results without reading them. In an interview on 08/11/23 at 11:09 AM, the Medical Director said the facility has designated nurses/DON to communicate results of a fracture or any negative acute findings verbally to the provider. He said failure to timely identify and notify the provider of an acute fracture could place residents at risk for a decreased quality of life, uncontrolled pain, infection and psychological distress. In an interview on 08/14/23 at 09:03 AM , NP A said on 07/28/23 she received a group of texts from RN C with results from Resident #238's x-rays as well as others. She said she briefly looked over it and missed the left femur fracture that was identified on one of the many pictures RN C sent. NP A said following the fall Resident #238 showed symptoms of a fracture and she wanted to perform additional x-rays but the resident refused so she did not enter in another order. She said Resident #238 appeared confused, had swelling in her leg with pain. NP A said Resident #238 was complaining off and on of pain and she was treated with pain medication. She said Resident #238 did not give the impression that she did not have a fracture but since the resident refused further radiology scans she did not enter new orders for x-rays even though the resident was symptomatic. NP A said RN C probably didn't call her with Resident #238's fracture results and the fracture was missed by all. She said the results she received did not have an alert stamp and the results were on the bottom and not the top of the report, so she missed the result. NP A said Resident #238's fracture was not identified until 08/03/23 (6 days after the fall). NP A said unidentified fracture results can happen and the facility staff are trying their best. She said failure to identify a fracture could place residents at risk for pain until the fracture is addressed, a further decrease in quality of care. She said the facility policy requires nurses to read the results, then verbally notify the provider of the results, nurses do not text results. In an interview on 08/15/23 at 03:09 PM, Family Member #2 said Resident #238 supposedly had 2 falls in the facility on 07/23/23 and 07/28/23. He said he even attended the care plan meeting on 07/25/23 and the 07/23/23 fall was not discussed. Family Member #2 said he was not notified of the second fall until 07/29/23 when he came to visit his mother and she was in unbearable pain and could not walk. Family Member #2 said after seeing his mother's change of condition he asked the staff what happened and that was when it was reported that she had fallen the day before. He said his expectation was that the facility would inform him of any accidents involving his mother as well as any change of conditions and he was not even notified of the 07/23/23 fall until 08/11/23 when the facility Administrator called him. Family Member #2 said he could not trust the facility since they failed to report his mother's falls and that made him wonder when exactly the injury happened. In an interview on 08/16/23 at 11:15 AM, the Administrator said following an accident/incident the facility must notify the resident's emergency contact of the incident, any change of conditions and then document the notification in the EMR. The Administrator said she spoke with Family Member #2 on Friday 08/11/23 to discuss his mother's fall and unidentified fracture. She said after talking to the resident she came to the realization that the resident was never informed about the 07/23/23 fall even though there was a care plan meeting on 07/25/23. The Administrator said the conversation she had with Family Member #2 gave her the impression that the resident's family was not immediately informed about the resident's fall on 07/28/23. She said failure to report accidents/incidents to resident emergency contacts is a violation of the resident or their advocates right and leaves them unaware of the resident's true state. Record review of the facility policy titled Test Results revised on 04/2007 revealed, 1- results of laboratory, radiological and diagnostic tests shall be reported in writing to the resident's attending physician or to the facility. 2- should the tests be provided to the facility, the attending physician shall be promptly notified of the results. 3- the DON or the charge nurse receiving the test results, shall be responsible for notifying the physician of such test results. This was determined to be an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 08/07/23 at 05:02 PM. The Administrator and was notified and provided the IJ template on 08/07/23 at 05:44 PM; a Plan of Removal (POR) was requested at that time. The following plan of removal was approved on 08/10/23 at 02:22 PM and the immediacy was removed on 08/12/23 at 03:48 PM. F-777 Radiology/Diagnostic Services Ordered/Notify Result [Facility name] has implemented the following Plan confirming systems are in place to ensure that radiology/diagnostic tests for residents are appropriately ordered, the results of the tests obtained and placed in the residents' medical records, and that the ordering physician is aware of the test results and took appropriate action. Immediate Action: Document here the action taken by the facility to ensure there are no residents in jeopardy or threat of harm. This could include assessing residents, reviewing records, assessing environmental concerns, provide training to immediate staff. Date each task and if needed when task will be completed and who is responsible for completing the task (if a contractor or supplies need coordinated what day the service of goods available to the facility). 1. The facility undertook corrective action with regards to Resident #238 to confirm that all radiology/diagnostic tests were appropriately ordered, the results obtained and placed in her medical records, and the ordering physician made aware of the results. Resident #238 was discharged from the facility on August 3, 2023. 2. The Interim Director of Nursing/Designee will audit all residents (as of August 1, 2023) to confirm that all ordered radiology/diagnostic tests were performed, results placed in the paper and electronic medical records, the physician notified of the results, and the physician reviewed the tests and took appropriate action, as necessary. See the details of the plan for continued auditing/monitoring outlined on page 5. 3. The facility identified that it had a process in place for ordering, obtaining the results, reviewing the results, and notification of the physician for radiology/diagnostic tests. The process includes: o Confirming that there is a physician order for the diagnostic/radiology test; o Confirming that the diagnostic/radiology test is completed as ordered by the physician; o Accessing the Care4 electronic medical record to obtain the diagnostic/radiology report; o Identifying and reviewing the diagnostic/radiology report; o Printing the diagnostic/radiology report; o Entering the diagnostic/radiology report into the Point Click Care electronic medical record; o Notifying the physician of the diagnostic/radiology result; o Ordering physician reviewing the diagnostic/radiology result and taking appropriate action; and o Nursing staff will document the notification of the physician and any orders given in Point Click Care. The Interim Director of Nursing/Designee has reinforced and re-educated all nursing staff on the process for ordering, obtaining the results, reviewing the results, and notification of the physician for radiology/diagnostic tests. For the details on the measures implemented, see the section below entitled Facility's Plan to Ensure Compliance Quickly. (Completed: August 10, 2023) 4. The Medical Director has issued a written communication to physicians reeducating them on the expectations with respect to the ordering and reviewing of results of radiology/diagnostic tests for residents. 5. The Interim Director of Nursing/Designee will audit all incident/accident reports of falls for the past thirty (30) days to ensure that proper nursing assessments were completed following the fall. 6. The Interim Director of Nursing/Designee has re-educated staff members on recognizing the risk factors for falls, fall precautions, resident assessment, appropriate documentation, and how to properly escalate following falls. 7. The Interim Director of Nursing/Designee has re-educated staff members (nurses and therapists) on the assessment and documentation of changes in resident's condition and escalation to physician, as necessary. In addition, the Interim Director of Nursing/Designee has re-educated nursing staff on the timely performance and documentation of pain assessments (within thirty minutes for IV medications and one (1) hour for oral medications), as well as the administration of pain medications in accordance with physician orders. ***All staff members will be educated on the topics outlined above before being allowed to work a shift. Completion Date: August 10, 2023 Facility's Plan to Ensure Compliance Quickly: How will the facility ensure compliance efficiently and timely? This could involve developing policies and procedures, training staff, repairing equipment, contacting physicians, having a QAIP meeting, developing forms, making repairs, or developing a new system. Be sure to document who provides the training, dates of training and how competency of staff of learning and training (return demonstrations, testing, competency checks). Please make sure dates of trainings are documented and if staff involvement is required that the staff member will not assume any job responsibilities until training has been received by them. Please make sure all audits, policies, notifications or services provided by outside contractors to remove the potential harm are dated. 1. The Interim Director of Nursing/Designee will audit all current residents (as of August 1, 2023) to confirm that all ordered radiology/diagnostic tests were performed, results placed in the electronic medical record, the physician notified of the results, and the physician reviewed the tests and took appropriate action, as necessary. See the details of the plan for continued auditing/monitoring outlined on page 5. 2. The Interim Director of Nursing/Designee and the Director of Operations are reviewing relevant facility policies and procedures to determine whether revisions are necessary to be consistent with the outlined measures in this Plan. 3. The facility Medical Director will re-educate all physicians via written communication about the process for ordering and reviewing the results of radiology/diagnostic tests. 4. By August 8, 2023, the Interim Director of Nursing/Designee is re-educating of all nursing staff members on the following topics: a) The end-to-end process for the ordering and completion of all radiology/diagnostic tests: o Confirming that there is a physician order for the diagnostic/radiology test; o Confirming that the diagnostic/radiology test is completed as ordered by the physician; o Accessing the Care4 electronic medical record to obtain the diagnostic/radiology report; o Identifying and reviewing the diagnostic/radiology report; o Printing the diagnostic/radiology report; o Entering the diagnostic/radiology report into the Point Click Care electronic medical record; o Notifying the physician of the diagnostic/radiology result; o Ordering physician reviewing the diagnostic/radiology result and taking appropriate action; and o Nursing staff will document the notification of the physician and any orders given in Point Click Care. b) Effective hand-off communication between shifts. This communication will include whether there are any pending orders for radiology/diagnostic tests; whether any radiology/diagnostic tests were performed; whether the results of any radiology/diagnostic tests are available; whether the final radiology/diagnostic test results have been printed and entered into the Point Click Care electronic medical records; whether the physician has been notified of the results of the radiology/diagnostic tests; and whether the physician gave any follow-up orders based on the radiology/diagnostic tests. c) The timely performance and documentation of pain assessments (within thirty minutes for IV medications and one (1) hour for oral medications), as well as the administration of pain medications in accordance with physician orders. d) The assessment and documentation of changes in a resident's condition and escalation to the physician, as necessary. e) The process for notifying the resident's physician if there are issues with pain control. f) The facility's existing policy on fall prevention. g) The facility's incident and accident reporting policy. h) The re-assessment of residents including, but not limited to, neurovascular checks up to 72 hours following a fall. ***All staff members will be educated on the topics outlined above before being allowed to work a shift. Completion Date: August 10, 2023 Monitoring: In an interview on 08/11/23 at 02:48 PM, CNA A said she had received training on 08/09/23 about the accident/incident reporting process as well as the fall procedure. CNA A understood the trainings and she was able to explain the actions to be taken. In an interview on 08/12/23 at 09:05 AM, RN D said she received one-on-one training with the IP on radiology and laboratory reports/shifts to shift communications, facility fall policy, accident/incident reporting expectations, pain assessment, pain management and physician escalation. RN D understood the trainings and she was able to explain the actions to be taken. In an interview on 08/13/23 at 08:03 AM, RN E said she did not receive one-on-one training on the facility fall policy, radiology and laboratory reports/shift to shift communications. accident/incident reporting expectations, abuse and neglect, documentation and physician escalation, . She said she was informed by RN D that training needed to be completed and she reviewed the papers left at the nursing station. RN E understood the trainings and she was able to explain the actions to be taken. In an interview on 08/13/23 at 07:02 PM, RN G said she received one on one in servicing falls, MD escalation, accident/incident reporting, pain assessments, change of conditions, radiology/laboratory reports, physician escalations and shift to shift communications. RN G understood the trainings and she was able to explain the actions to be taken. In an interview on 08/13/23 at 07:16 PM, RN D said she received one on one in servicing, falls, MD escalation, accident/incident reporting, radiology/laboratory reports, physician escalations, pain management. documentation and changes of condition. RN D understood the trainings and she was able to explain the actions to be taken. In an interview on 08/13/23 at 07:24 PM, RN I said she received one on one in servicing on , falls, MD escalation, radiology/laboratory reports, accident/incident reporting, change of conditions and documentation. RN I understood the trainings and she was able to explain the actions to be taken. In an interview on 08/14/23 at 11:40 AM, the DON said she had not completed a full audit of the accident/incidents specifically falls. She said she just confirmed that she had taken action on the fall, she had not thoroughly reviewed each fall to ensure that the proper nursing assessments were completed following the fall as stated in the approved POR. In an interview on 08/15/23 at 09:49 AM, the DON said she completed a full audit on all falls in the last 30 days the previous evening (08/14/23) to ensure appropriate action/nursing assessments were completed following falls. She said her audit identified consistent deficiencies in completion of neuros/assessments, documentation and follow up after these incidents. Record review of facility Order Listing Report, dated 08/08/23, revealed all pending radiology/diagnostic orders and results were reviewed and appropriate action taken by the DON. Record review of facility in-services records revealed facility staff were trained on the following: 08/07/23 TO 08/08/23 Accidents and Incidents, attendees included- RN E, LVN E, LVN A, LVN B, RN A, LVN G, RN F, LVN F, RN G - 08/08/23 to 08/09/23 Change in condition Assessment and Reporting, attendees included- RN A, LVN B, RN C, LVN E, LVNA, LVN G, RN F, LVN F, RN G - 08/08/23 to 08/09/23 Escalation/Chain of Command Procedure, attendees included- RN C, RN A, LVN B, LVN E, RN F, LVN F, LVN G, RN G, RN E, LVN A - 08/08/23 Following MD orders for Medication Administration Parameters, attendees included- LVN A, LVN B, LVN D, LVN E, LVN F, LVN G, RN A, RN E, RN F, RN G - 08/08/23 Falls Program and Incident Report, attendees included- LN E, LVN B, RN A, RN F, LVN F, LVN G, RN G - 08/09/23 Pain Assessment and Reassessment, attendees included- RN A, RN C, LVN A, - 08/09/23 Falls Program, attendees included- LVN B, RN C, RN E, RN C, RN B,, LVN A - 08/09/23 Reviewing, Printing out & filing diagnostic reports, attendees included- RN A, RN C, RN E, LVN A, LVN F, RN D, LVN B - 08/11/23 Fall Procedure, attendees included- RN C, RN D, LVN E, RN A - 08/11/23 Documentation (Admission; Fall Risk Assessment; Pain Tool, Transfer Form, SBAR, Change of Condition), attendees included- RN C, RN D, LVN E, RN A Record review of facility email titled Immediate Attention to Radiology/Diagnostic Services Results dated 08/08/23 at 05:15 PM and signed by the Medical Director revealed, the Medical Director notified the facility affiliated physicians the following: 1- for newly admitted patients, radiology/diagnostic services orders must address the patient's immediate needs. 2- results for routine radiology/diagnostic service must be reviewed within 24 hours of being notified that results are available 3- for stat orders, results must be reviewed within 2 hours of being notified that results are available. 4- acknowledgement of receipt and review of results must be documented in the patients EMR and a note of the plan of care must be included. Record review of a facility email titled Policies Reviewed UP dated 08/11/23 at 10:44 PM revealed the following policies were reviewed for needed changes by facility management: Pain assessment/reassessment and management, admission process, medication administration, incidents/accidents, medication reconciliation, escalation/chain of command, acute condition changes, ANE, administrating pain medications, standard medication administration times and critical results reporting policy. Record review of the facility Accident/Incident Audit revealed, the facility had identified failures in assessments following incidents, documentation or follow up on 10 out of 11 falls in the last 30 days. The Administrator was informed the IJ was removed on 08/15/23 at 03:48 PM. The facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of actual harm and a scope of pattern due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems that were put into place.
CRITICAL (K) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident was free from neglect for 6 of 1...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident was free from neglect for 6 of 12 residents (Resident #26, Resident #235, Resident #236, Resident #237, Resident #238 and Resident #270) reviewed for neglect. - The facility failed to ensure nursing staff properly assessed Resident #238 following a fall, identify a femur fracture, and properly notified the provider of a fracture for 6 days following a fall leaving the resident in pain up to 09 out of 10. - The facility failed to acquire and administer pain medication to Resident #235; the facility failed to assess Resident #235's pain following medication administration and failed to notify the resident's provider of ineffective pain control. - The facility failed to acquire and administer pain medication to Resident #237; the facility failed to assess Resident #237's pain following medication administration and failed to notify the resident's provider of ineffective pain control. - Nursing staff failed to enter accurately and timely acquire/administer medications to Resident #26, Resident #236 and Resident #270. On 08/03/23 09:20 AM an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified. The IJ was revised on 08/09/23 at 12:15 PM. While the IJ was removed on 08/15/23 at 03:48 PM, the facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of actual harm and a scope of pattern due to the facility continuing to monitor the implementation and effectiveness of their plan of removal These failures could place residents at risk of continued neglect, major injury and a decreased quality of life. Findings included: Resident #238 Record review of Resident #238's Face Sheet date 08/11/23 revealed, a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included; type 2 diabetes, UTI, unspecified fall and back fracture. The resident transferred to an acute care facility on 08/03/23. Record review of Resident #238's admission MDS dated [DATE] revealed, intact cognition as indicated by a BIMS score of 15 out of 15. Record review of Resident #238's Baseline Care Plan dated 07/21/23 revealed, the resident planned to return to her own home following rehabilitation, one person physical assist with most ADLs, always continent of both bladder and bowel, and a history of falls. Record review of Resident #238's Accident/Incident Report dated 07/23/23 signed by LVN A revealed, the resident was found on the floor of the restroom besides the toilet. The patient said she fell while trying to wash her hands, she hit her butt pretty hard and her back really hurts, hell everything hurts. Record review of Resident #238's Progress Notes dated 07/23/23 at 05:18 AM signed by LVN A revealed, the resident was found on the bathroom floor and reported her butt and back really hurt. The resident was assessed for new injuries and none were discovered. The resident reported pain at 9 out of 10 and NP A gave an order for Acetaminophen 500 mg to be administered for pain. There was no documentation of the resident's ROM or initiation of Neurochecks. Record review of Resident #238's Accident/Incident Report dated 07/28/23 signed by LVN A revealed, the resident was found on the floor screaming in pain. Resident #238 could not remember how she got to the floor. Record review of Resident #238's Progress Notes dated 07/28/23 at 05:38 AM signed by LVN A revealed, Resident #238 was found lying on the floor near her walker and the vacant bed. Resident was screaming in pain and was assisted into a chair by staff members and the resident complained of left leg and hip pain. NP A w as notified and she gave orders for a STAT xray and administration of Acetaminophen. There was no documentation of neuro checks being initiated, specific of a head-to-toe assessment or assessment of Resident #238's ROM. Record review of Resident 238's paper and electronic chart revealed, LVN A did not perform any neuro checks on the resident following her falls on 07/23/23 or 07/28/23. There was no follow-up documented following Resident #238's fall on 07/23/23. LVN A did not complete a fall risk assessment for Resident #238's fall on 07/28/23. There was no follow-up documented following Resident #238's fall on 07/28/23 Record review of Resident #238's Progress Notes dated 07/28/23 at 3:09 PM signed by RN C revealed, Resident #238 complained of pain to right thigh/leg and then complained about severe pain to left thigh and leg. The resident was seen by the NP and new orders were given for Tramadol (pain medication) and labs. The xray tech reported Resident #238 was not cooperative during the first xray so the patient had to be taken to the xray department. Record review of Resident #238's Xray Final Report printed on 07/28/23 at 05:33 PM revealed, Xray left femur- left femur intertrochanteric (where the leg bone meets the hip bone) fracture. Record review of text conversation between RN C and NP A dated 07/28/23 revealed, RN C sent pictures to NP A of Resident #238's xray report that indicated a left femur fracture at 06:24 AM. At 07/28/23 a 06:38 PM NP A responded back with looks normal. Record review of Resident #238's Physician's Order written 07/28/23 revealed, X-ray Right Femur and Right Leg for post fall pain one time only until 07/28/23 at 23:59 PM. There was no order entered for the left leg/hip and there was only 1 order entered on 07/28/23. Record review of Resident #238's Progress Notes from 07/28/23 to 08/02/23 revealed, no documentation of the resident's xray finding of left femur fracture and no documented notification to the physician of the pending xray results. Record review of Resident #238's OT Daily note dated 07/31/23 revealed, Resident #238 refused to get out of the room to do therapy in the gym. The resident reported pain to her left leg 9/10 on the pain scale. Resident #238 refused to do any standing exercises or activities and was highly sensitive with lower extremity movement. There was no documentation of the resident having a fracture. Record review of Resident #238's OT Daily note dated 08/01/23 revealed, Resident #238 continued to report pain to her left leg at 9/10 on the pain scale. Any slight movement intensifies pain. Increased lower extremity swelling and pain to the left leg restricts movement. There was no documentation of the resident having a fracture. Record review of Resident #238's OT Daily note dated 08/02/23 revealed, Resident #238 refused to do any standing or lower extremities exercises/movement. The resident was agreeable to perform upper extremity exercises. Resident #238 refused to do toilet training and upper body/lower-body ADLs due to her pain being unbearable. The resident said it's worse than having a baby. There was no documentation of the resident having a fracture. Record review of Resident #238's PT Daily note dated 08/02/23 revealed, patient unable to move lower left extremity due to increase pain. Patient unable to stand due to increase pain in left hip and knee. Resident #238 stated 9/10 pain on left hip, knee, and below knee nursing notified about the pain. There was no documentation of the resident having a fracture. Record review of Resident #238's Physician Notes dated 08/02/23 revealed, Resident #238 had edema (swelling) to left lower leg and reported pain when examined. Ongoing edema with the pain, concerned about bone/soft tissue involvement, requested a stat x-ray but resident declined. Resident continues to report pain to the left leg but phone call, previous x-ray was negative. The note was signed by NP A on 08/08/23 at 12:00 AM. Record review of Resident #238's Physician Notes dated 08/03/23 revealed, X-ray reviewed showed left hip fracture, Resident #238 continued to have pain and had difficulty putting weight on the left leg. The resident was on tramadol and ibuprofen on an alternating schedule with no benefits. The note was signed by MD A on 08/06/23 at 3:07 PM. In an interview on 08/07/23 at 12:36 PM, MD A said Identification of Resident #238's femur fracture from 07/28/23 was missed from top to bottom. She said once the fracture was identified on 08/03/23 the resident was sent out to the hospital immediately because the facility cannot manage a hip fracture without first receiving an orthopedic consult. MD A said NP A were responsible for receiving the xray results from 07/28/23 and was managing the patient with Tramadol and Ibuprofen scheduled every 6 hours. In an interview on 08/07/23 at 12:50 PM, NP A said Resident #238. NP A said on Friday 07/28/23 she received a call saying Resident #238's x rays were negative for fracture and she did not receive a second call notifying her of the fracture. She said during her clinical assessment the resident presented with a swollen leg which was suspicious for a fracture and was also experiencing a decline in function and increased pain. NP A said when a provider placed an order for an Xray, nursing staff are expected to enter the orders and once the test are completed notification must be provided to the NP/MD by phone notification. In an interview on 08/07/23 at 02:06 PM, the Therapy Manager said upon admission Resident #238 was not bad and she experienced falls on 07/23/23 and 07/28/23. He said there was no change in the resident after her fall on 07/23/23 but when she sustained a fall on 07/28/23 which led to a drastic change in function. He said Resident #238 went from just requiring supervision with ADLs/ambulation at admission to requiring 2 people maximum assistance following the fall, and the resident reported pain on a scale from 06-9 with movement. In an interview on 08/07/23 at 5:34 PM, the DON said after Resident #238's fall on 07/28/23 the resident received 2 xray results but there was no order entered for the 2nd xray so she couldn't track it. She said all xray results should be reviewed by the nurse and the physician should be notified via a phone call of the findings. The DON said failure to identify xray results timely could result in a delay in treatment, the resident developing a clot from the fracture and uncontrolled pain. In an interview on 08/08/23 at 06:58 AM, LVN A said on 07/28/23 she walked into the room and found Resident #238 on the floor by the unoccupied resident's bed. She said Resident #238 didn't know what happened. She said the facility's policy requires a head to toe assessment including the resident's ROM prior to moving the resident as well as neuro checks. LVN A said she did not initiate neuro checks on Resident #238 after the fall because she forgot and the fall occurred almost at the time of her shift. She said she was unable to assess Resident #238's left leg ROM because the resident would not allow her to touch it. LVN A said Resident #238 said it hurt and told the staff not to move her. She said Resident #238 said the pain was really bad in her hip and when the staff tried to get her to lie down she refused. LVN A said in retrospect the resident should not have been moved from the floor since she was in severe pain and her ROM could not be assessed. She said failure to assess residents properly following a fall could place residents at risk for fracture, infection, discomfort, neurological issues if the resident hit their heat and development of a blood clot at the site of the fracture. LVN A said she could not remember the specifics of Resident #238's fall on 07/23/23. In an interview on 08/09/23 at 08:40 AM, the Interim DON said following a fall nursing staff must immediately assess residents for injury including ROM assessments prior to moving the resident, any bleeding and initiation of neurological checks. She said the resident must be followed for 72 hours to ensure no injuries occurred. She said she noticed that some nurses are not performing neuro checks following falls and LVN A did not initiate neuro checks on Resident #238 following her falls on 07/23/23 and 07/28/23. In an interview on 08/09/23 at 09:16 AM, RN C said that during the week of 07/28/23 Resident #238 complained of pain in her thighs and leg. She said earlier in the morning of 07/28/23 an X-ray tech came to the resident's room to perform an xray of Resident #238's hip but the resident wasn't cooperating so a CNA had to assist the xray tech. RN C said since the resident was non-complaint during the previous xray the resident had to be taken to the hospital on the evening of 07/28/23. She said when the results came back she took pictures of the xray results and sent it to the NP A who reviewed the results and said everything was ok. RN C said she never read the xray results and only relied on the assessment given by NP A. RN C said the facility policy was that all nurses were expected to read the results and then notify the provider of the findings. She said that she was not supposed to send pictures of the results to NP A but she was busy so she just sent pictures of the results without reading them. In an interview on 08/09/23 at 09:10 AM, the interim DON said neglect can result from failure to take care or provide services to residents even if done unconsciously. She said when Resident #238's fracture was identified on 08/03/23 she did not consider it neglect but now she would consider it neglect since the facility failed to identify and take action on a resident's acute left femur fracture. In an interview on 08/09/23 at 10:24 AM, the Administrator said Neglect did not have to been done consciously. When asked by the surveyor if Resident #238's unidentified fracture that left the resident in pain for 6 days after the incident (07/28/23 to 08/03/23) was neglect, the Administrator said no she did not consider it neglect because the injury stemmed from the fall on 07/28/23. In an interview on 08/09/23 at 11:04 PM, the PT director said Resident #238 experienced a decline in therapy due to her pain so when she was discussed in the morning meeting on 08/02/23 he requested another xray be performed. He said he talked to NP A who said she would enter in an order for an xray but she did not so he followed up with MD A. He said MD A said she would enter in an order for an xray on 08/02/23, so on the morning of 08/03/23 he logged on to the radiology portal in anticipation of the results and that is when he saw the report dated 07/28/23 that identified Resident #238's left femur fracture. The Therapy Director said he immediately printed out the results and turn it over to the IP and Administrator. In an interview on 08/09/23 at 11:40 AM, the IP said the Therapy Director brought it to her attention on 08/03/23 that Resident #238 had an unidentified femur fracture from an xray performed on 07/28/23. Once notified she took it to the nurse responsible who then notified the doctor right away. The IP said she had no lab or radiology review responsibility but instead did what any prudent nurse would do. In an interview on 08/11/23 at 11:09 AM, the Medical Director said the facility has designated nurses/DON to communicate results of a fracture or any negative acute findings verbally to the provider. He said failure to timely identify and notify the provider of an acute fracture could place residents at risk for a decreased quality of life, uncontrolled pain, infection and psychological distress. In an interview on 08/14/23 at 09:03 AM , NP A said on 07/28/23 she received a group of texts from RN C with results from Resident #238's x-rays as well as others. She said she briefly looked over it and missed the left femur fracture that was identified on one of the many pictures RN C sent. NP A said following the fall Resident #238 showed symptoms of a fracture and she wanted to perform additional x-rays but the resident refused so she did not enter in another order. She said Resident #238 appeared confused, had swelling in her leg with pain. NP A said Resident #238 was complaining off and on of pain and she was treated with pain medication. She said the Resident #238 did not give the impression that she did not have a fracture but since the resident refused further radiology scans she did not enter new orders for x-rays even though the patient was symptomatic. NP A said RN C probably didn't call her with Resident #238's fracture results and the fracture was missed by all. She said the results she received did not have an alert stamp and the results were on the bottom and not the top of the report so she missed the result. NP A said Resident #238's fracture was not identified until 08/03/23 (6 days after the fall). NP A said unidentified fracture results can happen and the facility its best but failure to identify a fracture could place residents at risk for pain until the fracture is addressed, a further decrease in quality of care. She said the facility policy required nurses to read the results, then verbally notify the provider of the results; nurses do not text results. Resident #235 Record review of Resident #235's face sheet dated 06/28/23 revealed, a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: acute kidney failure, UTI and unspecified fall. The resident discharged on 07/18/23. Record review of Resident #235's secondary Face Sheet dated 06/28/23 at 10:28 AM revealed, Resident #235 admitted to the facility on [DATE] at 09:01 PM. Record review of Resident #235's Baseline Care Plan dated 06/27/23 revealed, the resident was alert & oriented and experiencing generalized aching pain Record review of Resident #235's Hospital Discharge Record dated 06/27/23 at 03:45 PM revealed, Resident #235's next scheduled dose of pain medications as follows: - Morphine 15 mg ER (an opioid pain medication)- 1 tablet be mouth every six hours with next dose due on 06/27/23 at 09:00 PM. - Oxycodone 10 mg (an opioid pain medication)- 1 Tablet by mouth every 6 hours with next dose due on 06/27/23 at 06:00 PM. Record review of Resident #235's Order Summary Report dated 06/28/23 revealed, - Morphine Sulfate 15 mg- give 1 tablet by mouth every 12 hours for pain ordered on 06/27/23 with a start date of 06/28/23. - Oxycodone 10 mg- give 1 tablet by mouth every 6 hours for pain ordered on 06/27/23 with a start date of 06/28/23 Record review of Resident #235's Progress Note dated 06/28/23 revealed - 01:16 AM- resident came in after 9 pm, [automated medication dispensing machine] does not have name. - 04:19 AM - complaint of pain to legs - 05:25 AM- no medication on hand - 05:56 AM- Resident #235 was informed that the MD was notified for prescriptions to be sent to the pharmacy. Resident #235 informed the facility that she had her Morphine and Oxycodone at home and she asked if her son brought them to the facility could the facility staff administer it. Record review of Resident #235's June MAR printed 06/28/23 at 12:50 PM revealed, her medications were not started until 06/28/23 and the following medications were not administered: - Famotidine 20 mg (used to treat acid reflux)- give 1 tablet by mouth for acid reflux scheduled for 06/28/23 at 08:00 AM. - Oxycodone 10 mg- give 1 tablet by mouth every 6 hours due at 06/28/23 at 12:00 AM. The start date was not entered until 06/28/23 at 06:00 AM. - Oxycodone 10 mg- give 1 tablet by mouth every 6 hours scheduled for 06/28/23 at 06:00 AM. Reason not administered- medication not available. - Morphine Sulfate 15 mg ER- give 1 tablet by mouth every 12 hours for pain due at 06/27/23 at 09:00 PM. The Order was entered incorrectly as Morphine Sulfate 15 mg (IR) with a start date of 06/28/23 at 08:00 AM Record review of Resident #235's Pharmacy Records dated 06/28/23 revealed, MD A did not submit electronic prescriptions for Resident #235's Oxycodone 10 mg and Morphine ER 15 mg until 06/28/23 at 05:31 PM, over 20 hours after the resident's admission. Record review of Resident #235's June MAR dated 06/28/23 at 12:50 PM revealed the following pain scores: - 05 out of 10 on 06/28/23 at 04:19 PM - 10 out of 10 when Resident was administered her Morphine 15 mg scheduled for 08:00 AM. - 08 out of 10 when Resident was administered her Oxycodone 10 mg scheduled for 12:00 PM. Record review of Resident #235's Physician's Notes from 06/27/23 to 07/18/23 revealed, no documentation of reported ineffective pain management, uncontrolled pain, or pain scores that remained the same after medication administration by nursing staff. Record review of Resident #235's June Progress Notes revealed, no documentation of unchanged or increased pain scores which indicated ineffective pain management and no documentation of MD notification of inefficient pain management. No documentation of post medication administration pain assessments to determine if the medication administered was effective. Record review of Resident #235's Oxycodone 10 mg ER June MAR revealed, - increased pain recorded on 06/28/23 between 06:00 AM and 12:00 PM doses from a 3 to an 8 out of 10. - unchanged pain recorded on 06/28/23 between 12:00 PM and 08:00 PM doses at an 8 out of 10. - unchanged pain recorded on 06/29/23 between 12:00 AM and 06:00 AM doses at a 5 out of 10. - increased pain recorded on 06/29/23 between 06:00 AM and 12:00 PM doses from a 5 to a 7 out of 10. - increased pain recorded on 06/29/23 between 12:00 AM and 06:00 PM doses from a 7 to an 8 out of 10. - unchanged pain recorded on 06/30/23 between 12:00 AM and 06:00 AM doses at a 5 out of 10. Record review of Resident #235' July Progress Notes revealed, no documentation of unchanged or increased pain scores which indicate ineffective pain management and no documentation of MD notification of inefficient pain management. No documentation of post medication administration pain assessments to determine if the medication administered was effective. Record review of Resident #235's Oxycodone 10 mg ER July MAR revealed, - increased pain from a 0 to a 4 out of 10 on 07/03/23 between 06:00 PM to 07/0/423 at 12:00 AM doses. - increased pain from a 0 to a 5 out of 10 on 07/04/23 between 12:00 Pm to 06:00 PM doses. - increased pain from a 3 to an 8 out of 10 on 07/06/23 between 12:00 PM to 06:00 PM doses. - increased pain from a 2 to an 9 out of 10 on 07/07/23 between 12:00 PM to 06:00 PM doses. - unchanged pain at 5 out of 10 recorded on 07/08/23 between 12:00 AM and 06:00 AM doses. - unchanged pain at 5 out of 10 recorded on 07/09/23 between 12:00 AM and 06:00 AM doses. - increased pain from a 5 to 6 out of 10 on 07/09/23 between 06:00 AM to 12:00 PM doses. - unchanged pain at 6 out of 10 recorded on 07/09/23 between 12:00 PM and 06:00 PM doses. - increased pain from a 3 to an 8 out of 10 on 07/11/23 between 06:00 AM to 12:00 PM doses. - increased pain from a 2 to a 9 out of 10 on 07/12/23 between 06:00 AM to 12:00 PM doses. Record review of Resident #235's Medication Administration Audit from 06/27/23 to 07/18/23 dated 08/03/23 revealed, the resident received her Oxycodone and Morphine outside of scheduled administration times on 23 different occasions during her stay: 1- Morphine ER 15 mg scheduled for 06/28/23 at 08:00 AM, administered at 09:15 PM 2- Morphine ER 15 mg scheduled for 06/30/23 at 08:00 PM, administered at 9:33 PM 3- Morphine ER 15 mg scheduled for 07/01/23 at 08:00 AM, administered at 09:05 PM 4- Oxycodone 10 mg scheduled for 07/02/23 at 06:00 PM, administered at 7:11 PM 5- Morphine ER 15 mg scheduled for 07/02/23 at 08:00 PM, administered at 11:32 PM 6- Morphine ER 15 mg scheduled for 07/03/23 at 08:00 PM, administered at 09:58 PM 7- Oxycodone 10 mg scheduled for 07/04/23 at 06:00 AM, administered at 7:05 AM 8- Morphine ER 15 mg scheduled for 07/04/23 at 08:00 AM, administered at 09:15 AM 9- Morphine ER 15 mg scheduled for 07/04/23 at 08:00 PM, administered at 10:44 PM 10- Morphine ER 15 mg scheduled for 07/06/23 at 08:00 AM, administered at 09:19 AM 11- Morphine ER 15 mg scheduled for 07/06/23 at 08:00 PM, administered at 09:20 PM 12- Morphine ER 15 mg scheduled for 07/07/23 at 08:00 AM, administered at 11:53AM 13- Morphine ER 15 mg scheduled for 07/07/23 at 08:00 PM, administered at 09:03 PM 14- Morphine ER 15 mg scheduled for 07/08/23 at 08:00 AM, administered at 11:03AM 15- Morphine ER 15 mg scheduled for 07/08/23 at 08:00 PM, administered at 10:07 PM 16- Morphine ER 15 mg scheduled for 07/09/23 at 08:00 AM, administered at 09:30AM 17- Morphine ER 15 mg scheduled for 07/10/23 at 08:00 PM, administered at 09:05 PM 18- Oxycodone 10 mg scheduled on 07/12/23 at 12:00 AM, administered at 3:16 AM 19- Oxycodone 10 mg scheduled for 07/14/23 at 12:00 PM, administered at 02:17 PM 20- Morphine ER 15 mg scheduled for 07/16/23 at 08:00 AM, administered at 10:05 AM 21- Oxycodone 10 mg scheduled for 07/17/23 at 06:00 PM, administered at 07:30 PM 22- Morphine ER 15 mg scheduled for 07/17/23 at 08:00 PM, administered at 09:12 PM 23- Morphine ER 15 mg scheduled for 07/18/23 at 08:00 AM, administered at 09:03 AM An observation on 06/28/23 at 08:45 AM revealed, Resident #235's family member approaching RN B while she prepared for medication administration to Resident #235. He said that he was very upset with the facility because prior to admission he was assured that Resident #235's medication would be available upon her admission but it was not. He said Resident #235 called him multiple times overnight to inform him that she had not received any of her medication since she arrived at the facility and she was in severe pain. Resident #235's family member then handed RN B 2 bottles of medication (Morphine ER 15 mg and Oxycodone 10 mg) and said he brought only a 2 days' supply to cover Resident #235 until the medication arrived at the facility. After Resident #235's family member entered the resident's room, RN B alerted the Interim DON to the arrival of the mediation at which point they both counted the medications and logged them into individual control sheets. In an interview on 06/28/23 at 10:10 AM, RN B said Resident #235 admitted to the facility on the night shift of 06/27/23. She said the patient's medications had not yet arrived from the pharmacy and the night shift nurse said Resident #235's family member would be bringing her pain medication so she was waiting for its arrival. When asked if RN B could have pulled the rest of Resident #235's unavailable medication from the facility EKit (floor stock of prescription medications available for emergency use), she said she administered the OTC medications as well as the pain medication brought in by the family member but she would have to check the facility EKit for the rest of Resident #235's medications. RN B said she immediately administered Morphine ER 15 mg to Resident #235 once it was delivered by the resident's family member but the Oxycodone was not due yet. She could not say when Resident #235 received her last dose of Oxycodone. RN B said failure to administer medications as ordered could place residents at risk for uncontrolled disease states such as uncontrolled pain. In an interview on 06/28/23 at 10:35 AM, the Interim DON said when a resident arrived at the facility the admitting nurse is expected to review the hospital paperwork to verify the last dose of medications received as well as when the next dose is due. She said the nurse then enters the order into the system and verifies it with the physician. The Interim DON said Resident #235 admitted to the facility on [DATE] at around 08:30 PM so her medications were not yet delivered by the pharmacy. She said that the expectation was for residents to receive their medications as ordered and that the nurse should have taken into consideration Resident #235's last doses to determine when the next dose was due and to at least get an order for a one-time dose to ensure that the resident received her medications. The interim DON said if a CII medication ( scheduled 2 controlled substances that require additional care because of the potential to intentionally or unintentionally abuse the drug) was unavailable nursing staff are expected to request an appropriate alternative treat the patients pain and most other medications could be found in the e-kit until the medication arrived. The Interim DON said that failure to administer medication to residents as ordered could place residents at risk for uncontrolled disease states and pain. In an interview on 06/28/23 at 11:11 AM, Resident #235 said she discharged from the hospital on [DATE] at 04:00 PM but she did not get picked up by the transport company until after 08:00 PM so by the time she arrived at the facility her medications were already due. She said when she arrived at the facility she explained to the staff that since she was discharged from the hospital at 4:00 PM the hospital was unable to administer any of her medications due after 4:00 PM. Resident #235 said she asked for her medications especially her pain medication but she was told the medication was not available at the facility. She said she specifically asked for her pain medications Morphine and Oxycodone because her pain was a 10 out of 10 but it was unavailable so her son had to bring in her pain medication in the morning (06/28/23). Resident #235 said she was in severe pain rendering her unable to do anything and writhing in pain prior to receiving her Morphine morning. She said after receiving her Morphine her pain was at 08 out of 10 but she had still not received her Oxycodone. In an interview on 08/02/23 at 01:56 PM, LVN B said resident pain can be assessed based on verbalization of pain on a scale of 0-10. She said the pain level is documented prior to administration of the pain medication but there is no trigger to document a post administration assessment in the EMR for scheduled medication. LVN B said nursing staff are expected to assess the patients pain level 30 minutes - 1 hr. after administration of the medication and document it in the progress notes. She said if a resident was assessed to have increase or unchanged pain levels then the medication was not effective and the provider must be notified. LVN B said Resident #235 was generally pleasant and she had been taking Oxycodone for a long time. She said she could not recall any issues with Resident #235's pain management but she did remember that the residents facial expressions did not match the level of pain she reported. In an interview on 08/13/23 at 08:03 AM, RN E said she was the admitting nurse for Resident #235 on 06/28/23. She said when the resident admitted to the facility she entered reconciled the medications with the provider, including the Resident #235's pain medications Oxycodone and Morphine. She said when she notified the provider, the provider stated that late admissions always resulted in problems with CII medication acquisition because they were unable to electronically prescribe the medications. She said she asked for an alternative and the provider gave an order for Tylenol and nothing else. RN E said Acetaminophen was not sufficient pain control for patients on opioid medications but that was the medication ordered for the resident upon admission. RN E said she thought the provider would send the prescription for Oxycodone and Morphine Immediately so she was not concerned of the need for alternative pain coverage. Resident #237 Record review of Resident #237's Nurse report dated 07/26/23 revealed, Resident #237 arrived at the facility at 7 PM. Record review of Resident #237's Face Sheet dated 08/11/23 revealed, a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility with diagnoses of: atrial fibrillation (irregular heartbeat), acute kidney failure, opioid dependence, anemia, hypertension (high blood pressure) and type 2 diabetes. The resident discharged from the facility on 08/05/23. Record review of Resident #237's admission MDS dated [DATE] revealed, intact cognition as indicated by a BIMS score of 15 out of 15, supervision with most ADLs, occasionally incontinent of bladder and always continent of bowel. Yes- resident received scheduled and PRN pain medication in the last 5 days[TRUNCATED]
CRITICAL (K) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Investigate Abuse (Tag F0610)

Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to thoroughly investigate for 1 of 5 Residents (Resident #238) reviewed...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to thoroughly investigate for 1 of 5 Residents (Resident #238) reviewed for neglect. -The facility failed to thoroughly investigate Resident #238's injury of unknown origin which resulted in a delay in identification and consultation of the resident's provider of a left hip fractured confirmed from a radiology report on 07/28/23 causing the resident severe pain until the resident was transferred to the hospital on [DATE]. - The facility failed to submit the investigation results of Resident #238's injury to the State Survey Agency within 5 working days of reporting the incident. On 08/09/23 12:15 PM an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified. While the IJ was removed on 08/15/23 at 02:10 PM, the facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of actual harm and a scope of pattern due to the facility continuing to monitor the implementation and effectiveness of their plan of removal. These failures could affect residents at risk for delayed identification of health conditions/treatment, severe injury, delated treatment and death. Findings Included Record review of Resident #238's Face Sheet date 08/11/23 revealed, a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included; type 2 diabetes, UTI, unspecified fall and back fracture. The resident transferred to an acute care facility on 08/03/23. Record review of Resident #238's Baseline Care Plan dated 07/21/23 revealed, the resident planned to return to her own home following rehabilitation, one person physical assist with most ADLs, always continent of both bladder and bowel, and a history of falls. Record review of Resident #238's admission MDS dated [DATE] revealed, intact cognition as indicated by a BIMS score of 15 out of 15. Record review of Resident #238's Accident/Incident Report dated 07/28/23 signed by LVN A revealed, the resident was found on the floor screaming in pain. Resident #238 could not remember how she got to the floor. Record review of Resident #238's Progress Notes dated 07/28/23 at 05:38 AM signed by LVN A revealed, Resident #238 was found lying on the floor near her walker and the vacant bed. Resident was screaming in pain and was assisted into a chair by staff members and the resident complained of left leg and hip pain. NP A w and as notified and she gave orders for a STAT xray and administration of Acetaminophen. There was no documentation of neuro checks being initiated, specific of a head to toe assessment or assessment of Resident #238's ROM. Record review of Resident 238's paper and electronic chart revealed, LVN A did not perform any neuro checks on the resident following her falls on 07/23/23 or 07/28/23. There was no follow-up documented following Resident #238's fall on 07/23/23. LVN A did not complete a fall risk assessment for Resident #238's fall on 07/28/23. There was no follow-up documented following Resident #238's fall on 07/28/23 Record review of Resident #238's Progress Notes dated 07/28/23 at 3:09 PM signed by RN C revealed, Resident #238 complained of pain to right thigh/leg and then complained about severe pain to left thigh and leg. The resident was seen by the NP and new orders were given for Tramadol (pain medication) and labs. The xray tech reported Resident #238 was not corporative during the first xray so the patient had to be taken to the xray department. Record review of Resident #238's Xray Final Report printed on 07/28/23 at 05:33 PM revealed, Xray left femur- left femur intertrochanteric (where the leg bone meets the hip bone) fracture. Record review of Resident #238's Physician's Order written 07/28/23 revealed, X-ray Right Femur and Right Leg for post fall pain one time only until 07/28/23 at 23:59 PM. There was no order entered for the left leg/hip and there was only 1 order entered on 07/28/23. Record review of Resident #238's OT Daily note dated 07/31/23 revealed, Resident #238 refused to get out of the room to do therapy in the gym. The resident reported pain to her left leg 9/10 on the pain scale. Resident #238 refused to do any standing exercises or activities and was highly sensitive with lower extremity movement. There was no documentation of the resident having a fracture. Record review of Resident #238's OT Daily note dated 08/01/23 revealed, Resident #238 continued to report pain to her left leg at 9/10 on the pain scale. Any slight movement intensifies pain. Increased lower extremity swelling and pain to the left leg restricts movement. There was no documentation of the resident having a fracture. Record review of Resident #238's OT Daily note dated 08/02/23 revealed, Resident #238 refused to do any standing or lower extremities exercises/movement. The resident was agreeable to perform upper extremity exercises. Resident #238 refused to do toilet training and upper body/lower-body ADLs due to her pain being unbearable. The resident said it's worse than having a baby. There was no documentation of the resident having a fracture. Record review of Resident #238's PT Daily note dated 08/02/23 revealed, patient unable to move lower left extremity due to increase pain. Patient unable to stand due to increase pain in left hip and knee. Resident #238 stated 9/10 pain on left hip, knee, and below knee nursing notified about the pain. There was no documentation of the resident having a fracture. Record review of Resident #238's Physician Notes dated 08/02/23 revealed, Resident #238 had edema (swelling) to left lower leg and reported pain when examined. Ongoing edema with the pain, concerned about bone/soft tissue involvement, requested a stat x-ray but resident declined. Resident continues to report pain to the left leg but phone call, previous x-ray was negative. The note was signed by NP A on 08/08/23 at 12:00 AM. Record review of Resident #238's Physician Notes dated 08/03/23 revealed, X-ray reviewed showed left hip fracture, Resident #238 continues to have pain and had difficulty putting weight on the left leg. The resident was on tramadol and ibuprofen on an alternating schedule with no benefits. The note was signed by MD A on 08/06/23 at 3:07 PM. Record review of Facility Self-Report dated 08/07/23 revealed, the facility submitted an incident report to the SA regarding Resident #238's Fall with fracture. The report did not specifically detail the facilities failure to identify the fracture for 6 days. Record review of the Provider Investigation Report dated 08/15/23 for Resident #238's 07/28/23 fall and presented on 08/15/23 revealed, the PIR was due on 08/14/23. In an interview on 08/07/23 at 12:36 PM, MD A said Identification of Resident #238's femur fracture from 07/28/23 was missed from top to bottom. She said once the fracture was identified on 08/03/23 the resident was sent out to the hospital immediately because the facility could not manage a hip fracture without first receiving an orthopedic consult. MD A said NP A was responsible for receiving the xray results from 07/28/23 and was managing the patient with Tramadol and Ibuprofen scheduled every 6 hours In an interview on 08/07/23 at 4:58 PM, the Administrator said Resident #238's fall was not reported to the SA on 08/03/23 because she only had to report injury of unknown origin and the resident's fracture was from a fall. In an interview on 08/07/23 at 05:23 PM, the Administrator said the DON was responsible for completing retrospective reviews of lab/radiology reports to ensure that the results are read, fractures identified, notifications are completed, and action was taking immediately on any acute negative radiological findings. In an interview on 08/07/23 at 5:34 PM, the DON said after Resident #238's fall on 07/28/23 the resident received 2 x-ray results but there was no order entered for the 2nd x-ray so she couldn't track it. She said all x-ray results should be reviewed by the nurse and the physician should be notified via a phone call of the findings. The DON said failure to identify x-ray results timely could result in a delay in treatment, the resident developing a clot from the fracture and uncontrolled pain She said she failed to thoroughly investigate the incident once the fracture was identified on 08/03/23. In an interview on 08/09/23 at 08:40 AM, the Interim DON said following a fall nursing staff must immediately assess residents for injury including ROM assessments prior to moving the resident, any bleeding and initiation of neurological checks. She said the resident must be followed for 72 hours to ensure no injuries occurred. She said the DON is responsible for immediately reviewing the resident's chart to make sure all the information regarding the accident/incident is correct and appropriate action/follow up was performed. The Interim DON said she reviewed Resident #238's unwitnessed fall the next day (07/29/23) but she did not go into detail(she did not review the resident's chart) so she did not identify LVN A did not initiate neuro checks on Resident #238 following her falls on 07/23/23 and 07/28/23 and assessments were not completed as required by the fall protocol. The Interim DON said she was still working on the investigation into Resident #238's fall with injury so she did not know who was responsible for the failure to identify the fracture but the incomplete assessments and missed fracture should have been caught. She said she did not perform a retrospective review of pending labs or accident/incidents and Resident #238's unidentified fracture seemed to have resulted from a multi system failure. In an interview on 08/09/23 at 09:40 AM, the Interim DON she was responsible for investigating any accident/incidents like falls to determine the cause or if neglect factored into the incident. She said she was notified of Resident #238's fall and complaint of pain 07/28/23 and she before she left in the evening she was aware that the resident had a pending x-ray result. She said she did not properly investigate Resident #238's fall and she did not go back to check on the pending x-ray results. The Interim DON said she did not review the resident's paper and electronic chart to determine if all necessary notifications and assessments were completed but instead interviewed the staff days following the fall about the incident. The DON said she did not go through the facility fall protocol when reviewing Resident #238's fall on 07/28/23. The Interim DON said on 08/03/23 she was notified by the IP that Resident #237 's x-ray from 07/28/23 resulted in a left femur fracture so she started looking into the investigation. The DON said she did not go back to her initial investigation on 07/28/23 and had sufficient evidence to determine the cause of the fall or any staff failures regarding the facility fall procedures. She said she didn't think she was properly trained to perform her DON roll because she was unaware of her obligation to perform retrospective reviews on nursing services. In an interview on 08/09/23 at 10:24 AM, the Administrator said she was notified of Resident #238's fall on 07/28/23 and the DON was responsible for investigating all reported incidents to ensure the appropriate action and follow up is performed. The Administrator said she was the abuse coordinator and responsible for reporting any allegations of abuse but she relies on the DON to provide the preliminary information used to determine if an incident was potentially neglect. The Administrator said all accidents/incidents must be reviewed by nursing within 24 hours and on the weekend there is a manager on duty and a nurse on call, and on 07/28/23 the Interim DON was the nurse on call thus making her responsible for investigating the incident. She said she was made aware of the unidentified fracture on 08/03/23 by the Therapy Director and after reviewing the chart the accident/incident and falls policy was not followed, the incident was not investigated, the resident was followed up immediately following the falland for 72 hours following the incident. The Administrator said failures should have been caught on day 1 and it is clear that these things did not occur when referring to proper investigation on accident/incidents. She said neglect does not have to be done intentionally and when asked if failure to promptly identify Resident #238's fracture leaving the resident in pain for 6 days was a form of neglect, she said it was not because the injury resulted from a fall and was not an injury of unknown origin. When asked what action should have been taken on 08/03/23 when she was notified of the fall, the Administrator said the facility took appropriate action by sending the resident to the hospital. The Administrator said the quality department was made aware of the 6 day late unidentified fracture on 08/03/23 and they made the decision on how to handle the incident. In an interview on 08/15/23 at 03:00 PM, the Administrator said she was aware the PIR was due on 08/14/23 but she was awaiting facility management to approve her submission. Record review of the facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation- Reporting and Investigating revised September 2022 revealed, Investigating allegations- 1- all allegations are thoroughly investigated, the Administrator initiates investigation. Follow-Up Report-1- within five business days of the incident, the administrator will provide a follow up investigation report. On 08/09/23 at 12:15 PM an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified. The Administrator was notified and provided the IJ template on 08/09/23 at 12:53 PM; and a POR was requested at that time. The following plan of removal was approved on 08/11/23 at 09:30 AM and the immediacy was removed on 08/15/23 at 02:10 PM F-835 Administration [The facility] has implemented the following Plan to confirm that systems are in place to ensure that all resident falls are thoroughly investigated and that the required State report is submitted as required by law. Immediate Action: Document here the action taken by the facility to ensure there are no residents in jeopardy or threat of harm. This could include assessing residents, reviewing records, assessing environmental concerns, provide training to immediate staff. Date each task and if needed when task will be completed and who is responsible for completing the task (if a contractor or supplies need coordinated what day the service of goods available to the facility). 1. The facility undertook corrective action with regards to Resident #238 to confirm that a thorough investigation of the fall was completed and a report of an allegation of neglect was filed with HHSC on August 7, 2023. Resident #238 was discharged from the facility on August 3, 2023. 2. The Interim Director of Nursing/Designee audited all incident/accident reports of falls for the past thirty (30) days to confirm whether the following was done: o Proper nursing assessments were completed following the fall; o Physician was notified of the fall; o Family was notified of the fall; o All ordered interventions were performed and accurately documented; o The incident/accident report of the fall was accurately and completely filled out; and o The information about the fall was documented in the skilled nursing notes that are used to prepare the 24 Hour Report. 3. The facility confirmed that it has an existing process in place to investigate patient falls and to make appropriate reports of the falls to HHSC. The process includes: o The treating nurse documents the fall on the incident/accident report in [electronic medical records system]; o The treating nurse prepares the skilled nursing note documenting the fall, the patient assessment following the fall, and any ordered interventions; o The treating nurse collects witness statements, if any, and documents them on the incident/accident report; o The Interim Director of Nursing/Designee reviews the incident/accident report to confirm its completion and accuracy; o As part of the investigation of the fall, the Interim Director of Nursing/Designee interviews the resident and staff members. The findings of the interviews are documented on the incident/accident report; o The Interim Director of Nursing/Designee assesses the completion of the incident/accident report and the investigation to confirm that all of the details of the fall are included; that the physician and family have been notified; and that all ordered interventions have been completed; o The Interim Director of Nursing/Designee signs off on the incident/accident report as complete; o Fall events and the status of the residents' condition and investigation are discussed during daily Stand Up and Stand Down meetings; o Fall events and the status of the residents' condition and investigation are discussed during Grand Rounds; and o Based on the findings of the completed investigation and a determination that the resident's fall caused bodily injury that was suspicious for abuse or neglect, the Facility Administrator timely reports the fall event to HHSC as follows: i. Within two (2) hours of forming the suspicion if (a) there is a suspicion of abuse or (b) the fall resulted in serious bodily injury, or ii. Within twenty-four (24) hours if there is not a suspicion of abuse and the bodily injury was not serious. 4. The Quality Department has re-educated the Interim Director of Nursing/Designee and the Facility Administrator on the process to investigate patient falls and to make appropriate reports of the falls to HHSC as outlined in No. 3 above. 5. The Interim Director of Nursing/Designee has re-educated nursing staff members on recognizing the risk factors for falls, fall precautions, resident assessment, appropriate documentation, and how to properly escalate following falls. ***All staff members will be educated on the topics outlined above before being allowed to work a shift. ***The effectiveness of the re-education and the competency of the nursing staff will be measured by reviewing fallouts from the audits performed by the Director of Nursing/Designee and providing just-in-time re-education of the staff member responsible for the fallout. Also, for identified areas of non-compliance, staff members will be re-educated in mandatory staff meetings held monthly. Attendance at these meetings will be tracked. Finally, the facility, in collaboration with the Quality and Education Departments, is developing an annual competency tool, which will cover the topics in this Plan, along with other nursing skills/competencies. Completion Date: August 10, 2023 Facility's Plan to Ensure Compliance Quickly: How will the facility ensure compliance efficiently and timely? This could involve developing policies and procedures, training staff, repairing equipment, contacting physicians, having a QAIP meeting, developing forms, making repairs, or developing a new system. Be sure to document who provides the training, dates of training and how competency of staff of learning and training (return demonstrations, testing, competency checks). Please make sure dates of trainings are documented and if staff involvement is required that the staff member will not assume any job responsibilities until training has been received by them. Please make sure all audits, policies, notifications or services provided by outside contractors to remove the potential harm are dated. 1. The Interim Director of Nursing/Designee and the Director of Operations are reviewing relevant facility policies and procedures to determine whether revisions are necessary to be consistent with the outlined measures in this Plan. 2. By August 10, 2023, the Quality Department is re-educating the Interim Director of Nursing and the Facility Administrator of the process to investigate patient falls and to make appropriate reports of the falls to HHSC. The process includes: o The treating nurse documents the fall on the incident/accident report in [electronic medical records system]; o The treating nurse prepares the skilled nursing note documenting the fall, the patient assessment following the fall, and any ordered interventions; o The treating nurse collects witness statements, if any, and documents them on the incident/accident report; o The Interim Director of Nursing/Designee reviews the incident/accident report to confirm its completion and accuracy; o As part of the investigation of the fall, the Interim Director of Nursing/Designee interviews the resident and staff members. The findings of the interviews are documented on the incident/accident report; o The Interim Director of Nursing/Designee assesses the completion of the incident/accident report and the investigation to confirm that all of the details of the fall are included; that the physician and family have been notified; and that all ordered interventions have been completed; o The Interim Director of Nursing/Designee signs off on the incident/accident report as complete; o Fall events and the status of the residents' condition and investigation are discussed during daily Stand Up and Stand Down meetings; o Fall events and the status of the residents' condition and investigation are discussed during Grand Rounds; and o Based on the findings of the completed investigation and a determination that the resident's fall caused bodily injury that was suspicious for abuse or neglect, the Facility Administrator timely reports the fall event to HHSC as follows: i. Within two (2) hours of forming the suspicion if (a) there is a suspicion of abuse or (b) the fall resulted in serious bodily injury, or ii. Within twenty-four (24) hours if there is not a suspicion of abuse and the bodily injury was not serious. 3. By August 10, 2023, the Interim Director of Nursing/Designee is re-educating all nursing staff members on the following topics: o Recognizing the risk factors for falls, fall precautions, resident assessment, appropriate documentation, and how to properly escalate following falls. o The assessment and documentation of changes in a resident's condition and escalation to the physician, as necessary. o The process for notifying the resident's physician if there are issues with pain control. o The facility's existing policy on fall prevention. o The facility's incident and accident reporting policy. This re-education covers the staff members accurately and completely preparing the report of the fall. o The re-assessment of residents including, but not limited to, neurovascular checks done up to 72 hours following a fall. ***All staff members will be educated on the topics outlined above before being allowed to work a shift. ***The effectiveness of the re-education and the competency of the nursing staff will be measured by reviewing fallouts from the audits performed by the Director of Nursing/Designee and providing just-in-time re-education of the staff member responsible for the fallout. Also, for identified areas of non-compliance, staff members will be re-educated in mandatory staff meetings held monthly. Attendance at these meetings will be tracked. Finally, the facility, in collaboration with the Quality and Education Departments, is developing an annual competency tool, which will cover the topics in this Plan, along with other nursing skills/competencies. Completion Date: August 10, 2023 Monitoring: In an interview on 08/11/23 at 02:48 PM, CNA A said she received training on 08/09/23 about the accident/incident reporting process as well as the fall procedure. CNA A understood the trainings and she was able to explain the actions to be taken. In an interview on 08/12/23 at 09:05 AM, RN D said she received one-on-one training with the IP facility fall policy, abuse and neglect, accident/incident reporting expectations, documentation, and physician escalation. RN D understood the trainings and she was able to explain the actions to be taken. In an interview on 08/13/23 at 08:03 AM, RN E said she did not receive one-on-one training on the facility fall policy, accident/incident reporting expectations, abuse and neglect, documentation and physician escalation. She said she was informed by RN D that training needed to be completed and she reviewed the papers left at the nursing station. RN E understood the trainings and she was able to explain the actions to be taken. In an interview on 08/13/23 at 07:02 PM, RN G said she received one on one in servicing falls, MD escalation, accident/incident reporting, pain assessments, change of conditions and documentation. RN G understood the trainings and she was able to explain the actions to be taken. In an interview on 08/13/23 at 07:16 PM, RN D said she received one on one in servicing, falls, MD escalation, accident/incident reporting, pain documentation and changes of condition. RN D understood the trainings and she was able to explain the actions to be taken. In an interview on 08/13/23 at 07:24 PM, RN I said she received one on one in servicng on , falls, MD escalation, accident/incident reporting, change of conditions and documentation. RN I understood the trainings and she was able to explain the actions to be taken. In an interview on 08/14/23 at 11:40 AM, the DON said she had not completed a full audit of the accident/incidents specifically falls. She said she just confirmed that she had taken action on the fall, she had not thoroughly reviewed each fall to ensure that the proper nursing assessments were completed following the fall as stated in the approved POR. In an interview on 08/15/23 at 09:30 AM, the VP of operations said she in-serviced the Interim DON and administrator on: the fall protocol, accident/incidents, documentation, assessments, completion of full investigations and reporting. She said the facility audits identified overall challenges with completion of Neurochecks, assessment of ROM, and insufficient/inappropriate documentation of resident follow up across multiple multiple incidents, In an interview on 08/15.23 at 09:49 AM, the DON said she completed a full audit on all falls in the last 30 days the previous evening (08/14/23) to ensure appropriate action/nursing assessments were completed following falls. She said her audit identified consistent failures in completion of assessments and neuro checks. The DON said she is expected to complete a thorough investigation following an incident ensuring the appropriate/ immediate assessments are completed, Neurochecks performed, MD/family notification and resident follow up. She said all allegations of neglect should be reported immediately and failure to investigate and report accidents/incidents could place residents at risk of increased neglect, pain, decrease in health or cause a sentinel event like serious harm or death. Record review of facility email titled Policies Reviewed UP dated 08/11/23 at 10:44 PM revealed the following policies were reviewed for needed changes by facility management: Pain assessment/reassessment and management, admission process, medication administration, incidents/accidents, medication reconciliation, escalation/chain of command, acute condition changes, ANE, administrating pain medications, standard medication administration times and critical results reporting policy. Record review of facility in-service records revealed the following training listed in the POR was completed with nursing staff; 08/07/23 TO 08/08/23 Accidents and Incidents, attendees included- RN E, LVN E, LVN A, LVN B, RN A, LVN G, RN F, LVN F, RN G - 08/08/23 to 08/09/23 Change in condition Assessment and Reporting, attendees included- RN A, LVN B, RN C, LVN E, LVNA, LVN G, RN F, LVN F, RN G - 08/08/23 to 08/09/23 Escalation/Chain of Command Procedure, attendees included- RN C, RN A, LVN B, LVN E, RN F, LVN F, LVN G, RN G, RN E, LVN A - 08/08/23 Following MD orders for Medication Administration Parameters, attendees included- LVN A, LVN B, LVN D, LVN E, LVN F, LVN G, RN A, RN E, RN F, RN G - 08/08/23 Falls Program and Incident Report, attendees included- LN E, LVN B, RN A, RN F, LVN F, LVN G, RN G - 08/09/23 Pain Assessment and Reassessment, attendees included- RN A, RN C, LVN A, - 08/09/23 Falls Program, attendees included- LVN B, RN C, RN E, RN C, RN B,, LVN A - 08/09/23 Reviewing, Printing out & filing diagnostic reports, attendees included- RN A, RN C, RN E, LVN A, LVN F, RN D, LVN B - 08/11/23 Fall Procedure, attendees included- RN C, RN D, LVN E, RN A - 08/11/23 Documentation (Admission; Fall Risk Assessment; Pain Tool, Transfer Form, SBAR, Change of Condition), attendees included- RN C, RN D, LVN E, RN A Record review of Facility Administration in-service records revealed: - 08/03/23 the DON received training on Medication Reconciliation - 08/07/23 the DON received training on Falls - 08/07/23 the DON received training on Accidents and Incidents - 08/10/23 the Administrator and DON received training on Incident and Fall investigation and reporting. Record review performed on 08/14/23 of the facility Accident/Incident Audit signed 08/10/23 revealed, the DON had not audited all reported accidents/incidents over the last 30 days. There was no result to the audit. In a side by side record review performed with the DON on 08/15/23 of the facility Accident/Incident Audit revealed, the facility had identified failures in assessments following incidents, documentation or follow up on 10 out of 11 falls in the last 30 days. The surveyor identified a fall experienced by Resident #248 that the facility failed to identify during its audit. The Administrator was informed the IJ was removed on 08/15/23 at 02:10 PM. The facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of actual harm and a scope of pattern due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems that were put into place.
CRITICAL (K) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance wit...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan and the residents' choices 1 of 8 residents (Resident #238) reviewed for quality of care. - The facility failed to properly assess Resident #238 following a fall, identify a femur fracture and properly notify the provider of a fracture for 6 days following a fall leaving the resident in pain up to 09 out of 10. On 08/09/23 12:15 PM an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified. While the IJ was removed on 08/15/23 at 02:10 PM, the facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of actual harm and a scope of pattern due to the facility continuing to monitor the implementation and effectiveness of their plan of removal. These failures could place residents at risk for a delay of care or treatment, pain, suffering and death. Findings included: Record review of Resident #238's Face Sheet date 08/11/23 revealed, a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included; type 2 diabetes, UTI, unspecified fall and back fracture. The resident transferred to the hospital on [DATE] for acute care Record review of Resident #238's Baseline Care Plan dated 07/21/23 revealed, the resident planned to return to her own home following rehabilitation, one person physical assist with most ADLs, always continent of both bladder and bowel, and a history of falls. Record review of Resident #238's admission MDS dated [DATE] revealed, intact cognition as indicated by a BIMS score of 15 out of 15. Record review of Resident #238's Hospital Discharge Record dated 07/21/23 revealed, the resident was treated for a wedge compression fracture of the chest and spine following a fall that required spinal surgery. Record review of Resident #238's Accident/Incident Report dated 07/23/23 signed by LVN A revealed, the resident was found on the floor of the restroom besides the toilet. The patient said she fell while trying to wash her hands, she hit her butt pretty hard and her back really hurts, hell everything hurts. Record review of Resident #238's Assessments dated 07/23/23 revealed, resident had a recent fall and was identified as having a high risk of falls per her fall risk assessment. Record review of Resident #238's Progress Notes dated 07/23/23 at 05:18 AM signed by LVN A revealed, the resident was found on the bathroom floor and reported her butt and back really hurt. The resident was assessed for new injuries and none were discovered. The resident reported pain at 9 out of 10 and NP A gave an order for Acetaminophen 500 mg to be administered for pain. There was no documentation of the resident's ROM or initiation of Neurochecks. Record review of Resident #238's Accident/Incident Report dated 07/28/23 signed by LVN A revealed, the resident was found on the floor screaming in pain. Resident #238 could not remember how she got to the floor. Record review of Resident #238's Progress Notes dated 07/28/23 at 05:38 AM signed by LVN A revealed, Resident #238 was found lying on the floor near her walker and the vacant bed. Resident was screaming in pain and was assisted into a chair by staff members and the resident complained of left leg and hip pain. NP A w as notified and she gave orders for a STAT xray and administration of Acetaminophen. There was no documentation of neuro checks being initiated, specific of a head-to-toe assessment or assessment of Resident #238's ROM. Record review of Resident 238's paper and electronic chart revealed, LVN A did not perform any neuro checks on the resident following her falls on 07/23/23 or 07/28/23. There was no follow-up documented following Resident #238's fall on 07/23/23. LVN A did not complete a fall risk assessment for Resident #238's fall on 07/28/23. There was no follow-up documented following Resident #238's fall on 07/28/23 Record review of Resident #238's Progress Notes dated 07/28/23 at 3:09 PM signed by RN C revealed, Resident #238 complained of pain to right thigh/leg and then complained about severe pain to left thigh and leg. The resident was seen by the NP and new orders were given for Tramadol (pain medication) and labs. The xray tech reported Resident #238 was not corporative during the first xray so the patient had to be taken to the xray department. Record review of Resident #238's Xray Final Report printed on 07/28/23 at 05:33 PM revealed, Xray left femur- left femur intertrochanteric (where the leg bone meets the hip bone) fracture. Record review of text conversation between RN C and NP A dated 07/28/23 revealed, RN C sent pictures to NP A of Resident #238's xray report that indicated a left femur fracture at 06:24 AM. At 07/28/23 a 06:38 PM NP A responded back with looks normal. Record review of Resident #238's Physician's Order written 07/28/23 revealed, X-ray Right Femur and Right Leg for post fall pain one time only until 07/28/23 at 23:59 PM. There was no order entered for the left leg/hip and there was only 1 order entered on 07/28/23. Record review of Resident #238's Progress Notes from 07/28/23 to 08/02/23 revealed, no documentation of the resident's xray finding of left femur fracture and no documented notification to the physician of the pending xray results. No documentation of notification of Resident #238's pain to the physician Record review of Resident #238's progress notes from 07/29/23 to 08/02/23 revealed, 07/30/23 at 06:42 AM signed by RN H- general pain at 6/10 07/30/23 at 05:03 PM signed by RN J- at 05:00 PM resident complained of pain in her left leg. 07/30/23 at 10:00 PM signed by RNG- general pain at 6/10 07/31/23 at 04:09 AM signed by RN G- general pain at 5/10 08/01/23- no nursing notes about the resident's pain 08/02/23- no nursing notes about the resident's pain Record review of Resident #238's OT Daily note dated 07/31/23 revealed, Resident #238 refused to get out of the room to do therapy in the gym. The resident reported pain to her left leg 9/10 on the pain scale. Resident #238 refused to do any standing exercises or activities and was highly sensitive with lower extremity movement. There was no documentation of the resident having a fracture. Record review of Resident #238's Provider Progress Note effective date 08/01/23 signed by NP A at 12:03 AM revealed, Therapy staff at bedside, resident sitting in wheelchair, leaning over to her knees and refusing to straighten her. Therapy attempted to straighten her but refusing to sit upright, reporting pain to left leg, had a fall earlier. But after further attempt, resident was able to sit up in wheelchair. Reporting pain and staff reporting increased anxiety, night nurse reported that she gave an extra dose of BuSpar. Record review of Resident #238's Provider Progress Note dated 08/02/23 signed by NP A at 12:02 AM revealed, resident Allowed me to examine lower extremity, edema (swelling) to left lower extremity noticed also resident reporting pain when examined. Ongoing edema with the pain, concerned about bone/soft tissue involvement, requested a stat x-ray but resident declined. Attempted to explain to the resident but consistently declining x-ray. At 1 point, resident also was attempting to raise her leg to show that she can move her leg warranting noted on x-ray. Discussed with the nursing staff, continue monitoring and if resident continues to report pain, advised to repeat x-ray continue tramadol. Resident continues to report pain to the left leg but per phone call, previous x-ray was negative. Will repeat x-ray stat. The note was signed by the NP A on 08/08/23 at 12:00 AM. Record review of Resident #238's Provider Progress Note dated 08/03/23 signed by NP A at 12:04 AM revealed, Resident examined today. Lying down in bed. X-ray reviewed showed left intertrochanteric fracture although the pelvic x-ray was unremarkable. Resident continues to have pain, has been difficulty putting weight onto the left leg. Currently on tramadol and ibuprofen scheduled alternatingly, with no benefits. Transportation has been called and as per staff for resident to be sent out to the hospital although staff mentioned that she has been refusing to go to the hospital. The note was signed by NPA on 08/06/23 at 03:07 PM. Record review of Resident #238's OT Daily note dated 08/01/23 revealed, Resident #238 continued to report pain to her left leg at 9/10 on the pain scale. Any slight movement intensifies pain. Increased lower extremity swelling and pain to the left leg restricts movement. There was no documentation of the resident having a fracture. Record review of Resident #238's OT Daily note dated 08/02/23 revealed, Resident #238 refused to do any standing or lower extremities exercises/movement. The resident was agreeable to perform upper extremity exercises. Resident #238 refused to do toilet training and upper body/lower-body ADLs due to her pain being unbearable. The resident said it's worse than having a baby. There was no documentation of the resident having a fracture. Record review of Resident #238's PT Daily note dated 08/02/23 revealed, patient unable to move lower left extremity due to increase pain. Patient unable to stand due to increase pain in left hip and knee. Resident #238 stated 9/10 pain on left hip, knee, and below knee nursing notified about the pain. There was no documentation of the resident having a fracture. Record review of Resident #238's Physician Notes dated 08/02/23 revealed, Resident #238 had edema (swelling) to left lower leg and reported pain when examined. Ongoing edema with the pain, concerned about bone/soft tissue involvement, requested a stat x-ray but resident declined. Resident continues to report pain to the left leg but phone call, previous x-ray was negative. The note was signed by NP A on 08/08/23 at 12:00 AM. Record review of Resident #238's Physician Notes dated 08/03/23 revealed, X-ray reviewed showed left hip fracture, Resident #238 continues to have pain and had difficulty putting weight on the left leg. The resident was on tramadol and ibuprofen on an alternating schedule with no benefits. The note was signed by MD A on 08/06/23 at 3:07 PM. In an interview on 08/07/23 at 12:36 PM, MD A said Identification of Resident #238's femur fracture from 07/28/23 was missed from top to bottom. She said once the fracture was identified on 08/03/23 the resident was sent out to the hospital immediately because the facility cannot manage a hip fracture without first receiving an orthopedic consult. MD A said NP A was responsible for receiving the xray results from 07/28/23 and was managing the patient with Tramadol and Ibuprofen scheduled every 6 hours. In an interview on 08/07/23 at 12:50 PM, NP A said Resident #238. NP A said on Friday 07/28/23 she received a call saying Resident #238's x rays were negative for fracture and she did not receive a second call notifying her of the fracture. She said during her clinical assessment the resident presented with a swollen leg which was suspicious for a fracture and was also experiencing a decline in function and increased pain. NP A said when a provider places an order for an Xray, nursing staff are expected to enter the orders and once the test are completed notification must be provided to the NP/MD by phone notification. In an interview on 08/07/23 at 02:06 PM, the Therapy Manager said upon admission Resident #238 was not bad and she experienced falls on 07/23/23 and 07/28/23. He said there was no change in the resident after her fall on 07/23/23 but when she sustained a fall on 07/28/23 which led to a drastic change in function. He said Resident #238 went from just requiring supervision with ADLs/ambulation at admission to requiring 2 people maximum assistance following the fall, and the resident reported pain on a scale from 06-9 with movement. In an interview on 08/07/23 at 5:34 PM, the DON said after Resident #238's fall on 07/28/23 the resident received 2 xray results but there was no order entered for the 2nd xray so she couldn't track it. She said all xray results should be reviewed by the nurse and the physician should be notified via a phone call of the findings. The DON said failure to identify xray results timely could result in a delay in treatment, the resident developing a clot from the fracture and uncontrolled pain. In an interview on 08/08/23 at 08:40 AM, the Interim DON said immediately when a resident falls nursing staff are expected to assess the resident's range of motion, identify any injuries and check vitals. She said all unidentified falls also requires the initiation and completion of Neurochecks to identify any potential brain injuries. The interim DON said residents should be monitored for 72 hours following a fall to ensure there are no residual injuries like unretractable pain or altered mental status. She said that after reviewing the resident's file, the nurse did not complete proper post fall assessments and failure to assess residents appropriately following a fall could place residents at risk of delayed identification and treatment of injuries, uncontrolled pain and even death. In an interview on 08/08/23 at 06:58 AM, LVN A said on 07/28/23 she walked into the room and found Resident #238 on the floor by the unoccupied resident's bed. She said Resident #238 didn't know what happened. She said the facility policy requires a head to toe assessment including the resident's ROM prior to moving the resident as well as neuro checks. LVN A said she did not initiate neuro checks on Resident #238 after the fall because she forgot and the fall occurred almost at the time of her shift. She said she was unable to assess Resident #238's left leg ROM because the resident would not allow her to touch it. LVN A said Resident #238 said it hurt and told the staff not to move her. She said Resident #238 said the pain was really bad in her hip and when the staff tried to get her to lie down she refused. LVN A said in retrospect the resident should not have been moved from the floor since she was in severe pain and her ROM could not be assessed and the resident should have been sent out to the hospital. LVN A could not answer why she didn't send Resident #238 out. She said failure to assess residents properly following a fall could place residents at risk for fracture, infection, discomfort, neurological issues if the resident hit their head and development of a blood clot at the site of the fracture. In an interview on 08/09/23 at 08:40 AM, the Interim DON said following a fall nursing staff must immediately assess residents for injury including ROM assessments prior to moving the resident, any bleeding and initiation of neurological checks. She said the resident must be followed for 72 hours to ensure no injuries occurred. She said she has noticed that some nurses are not performing neuro checks following falls and LVN A did not initiate neuro checks on Resident #238 following her falls on 07/23/23 and 07/28/23. In an interview on 08/09/23 at 09:16 AM, RN C said that during the week of 07/28/23 Resident #238 complained of pain in her thighs and leg. She said earlier in the morning of 07/28/23 an X-ray tech came to the resident's room to perform an xray of Resident #238's hip but the resident wasn't corporation so a CNA had to assist the xray tech RN C said since the resident was non-complaint during the previous xray the resident had to be taken to the hospital on the evening of 07/28/23. She said when the results came back she took pictures of the xray results and sent it to the NP A who reviewed the results and said everything was ok. RN C said she never read the xray results and only relied on the assessment given by NP A. RN C said the facility policy was that all nurses were expected to read the results and then notify the provider of the findings. She said that she was not supposed to send pictures of the results to NP A but she was busy so she just sent pictures of the results without reading them. In an interview on 08/09/23 at 11:04 PM, the PT director said Resident #238 experienced a decline in therapy due to her pain so when she was discussed in the morning meeting on 08/02/23 he requested another xray be performed. He said he talked to NP A who said she would enter in an order for an xray but she did not so he followed up with MD A. He said MD A said she would enter in an order for an xray on 08/02/23, so on the morning of 08/03/23 he logged on to the radiology portal in anticipation of the results and that is when he saw the report dated 07/28/23 that identified Resident #238's left femur fracture. The Therapy Director said he immediately printed out the results and turn it over to the IP and Administrator. In an interview on 08/09/23 at 11:40 AM, the IP said the Therapy Director brought it to her attention on 08/03/23 that Resident #238 had an unidentified femur fracture from an t performed on 07/28/23. Once notified she took it to the nurse responsible who then notified the doctor right away. The IP said she had no lab or radiology review responsibility but instead did what any prudent nurse would do. In an interview on 08/11/23 at 11:09 AM, the Medical Director said the facility has designated nurses/DON to communicate results of a fracture or any negative acute findings verbally to the provider. He said failure to timely identify and notify the provider of an acute fracture could place residents at risk for a decreased quality of life, uncontrolled pain, infection and psychological distress. In an interview on 08/14/23 at 09:03 AM , NP A said on 07/28/23 she received a group of texts from RN C with results from Resident #238's x-rays as well as others. She said she briefly looked over it and missed the left femur fracture that was identified on one of the many pictures RN C sent. NP A said following the fall Resident #238 showed symptoms of a fracture and she wanted to perform additional x-rays but the resident refused so she did not enter in another order. She said Resident #238 appeared confused, had swelling in her leg with pain. NP A said Resident #238 was complaining off and on of pain and she was treated with pain medication. She said the Resident #238 did not give the impression that she did not have a fracture but since the resident refused further radiology scans she did not enter new orders for x-rays even though the patient was symptomatic. NP A said RN C probably didn't call her with Resident #238's fracture results and the fracture was missed by all. She said the results she received did not have an alert stamp and the results were on the bottom and not the top of the report so she missed the result. NP A said Resident #238's fracture was not identified until 08/03/23 (6 days after the fall). NP A said unidentified fracture results can happen and the facility its best but failure to identify a fracture could place residents at risk for pain until the fracture is addressed, a further decrease in quality of care. She said the facility policy required nurses to read the results, then verbally notify the provider of the results; nurses do not text results. In an interview on 08/16/23 at 10:32 AM, the Interim DON said there are pharmacological and non-pharmacological methods to manage residents' pain. She said proper pain management involves the acquisition of medications, timely administration of the medications, proper post administration assessments, as well as notification and documentation of ineffective pain control. The interim DON said that the facility identified discrepancies in medication administration times, acquisitions of medications, timely reassessment, provider escalation and documentation in their pain management program. She said failure to manage residents pain thoroughly and the above deficient practices could place residents at risk of uncontrolled/unretractable pain, worsening/decline of health, decreased quality of life, and slowed recovery due to the inability to complete therapy. The Interim DON said that upon a resident's admission nurses are expected to receive the order, reconcile the medications determining the first dose, identify any discrepancies and escalate and clarify all issues. She said over the survey the facility had identified discrepancies in the first doses of medications administered either through incorrect data entry or unavailable medications. The Interim DON said failure to enter and receive admissions orders could place residents at risk for worsening of condition, uncontrolled pain as well as a decreased therapeutic effect of prescribed medications. The Interim said that neglect was a failure to provide services such as: failure to properly assess residents following a fall and timely identifying negative radiology/laboratory findings. She said during the survey process the facility had identified discrepancies in the fall program and radiology reporting system and these failures could place residents at risk for delay in diagnosis of problems, delay in treatment, uncontrolled pain and death. Record review of the facility policy titled Test Results revised on 04/2007 revealed, 1- results of laboratory, radiological and diagnostic tests shall be reported in writing to the resident's attending physician or to the facility. 2- should the tests be provided to the facility, the attending physician shall be promptly notified of the results. 3- the DON or the charge nurse receiving the test results, shall be responsible for notifying the physician of such test results. Record review of the facility policy titled Charting and Documentation revised 07/2017 revealed, 2- the following information is to be documented in the residents medical record: a- objective observations; b- medication administered; c- treatments or services performed; d- changes in the resident's condition; e- events, incidents or accidents involving the resident. 7-documentation of procedures and treatments will include care-specific details, including: c- the assessment data and/or any unusual findings obtained during the procedure/treatment. Record review of the facility policy titled Falls- Clinical Protocol revised 03/2018 revealed, 5- the staff will valuate and document falls that occur while the individual is in the facility. Monitoring and Follow-up: 1- the staff, with the physician's guidance will follow up on any fall associated with injury until the resident is stable and delayed complications such as late fracture or subdural hematoma have been ruled out or resolved. Record review of the facility policy titled Assessing Falls and Their Causes revised 03/2018 revealed, After a fall: 1- if a resident has just fallen, or is found on the floor without a witness to the event evaluate for possible injuries to the head, neck, spine, and extremities; 2- obtain and record vital signs as soon as it is safe to do so. 3- if there is evidence of injury, provide appropriate first aid and/or obtain medical treatment immediately. 4- if an assessment rules out significant injury, help the resident to a comfortable sitting, lying, or standing position and then document relevant details. 6- observe for delayed complications of a fall for approximately 48 hours after an observed or suspected fall, and document findings in the medical record. Document ant observed signs and symptoms of pain, swelling, bruising, deformity, and/or decreased mobility; and any changes in level of responsiveness/consciousness and overall function. Note the presence or absence of significant findings. Documentation- when a resident falls, the following information should be recorded in the resident's medical record: 1-the condition in which the resident was found; 2- assessment data including vital signs and any obvious injuries; 3- interventions, first-aid, or treatment administered; 4- notifications to the family and physician as indicated; 5- completion of a fall risk assessment On 08/09/23 at 12:15 PM an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified. The Administrator was notified and provided the IJ template on 08/09/23 at 12:53 PM; and a POR was requested at that time. The following plan of removal was approved on 08/11/23 at 09:30 AM and the immediacy was removed on 08/15/23 at 02:10 PM F-835 Administration [The facility] has implemented the following Plan to confirm that systems are in place to ensure that all resident falls are thoroughly investigated and that the required State report is submitted as required by law. Immediate Action: Document here the action taken by the facility to ensure there are no residents in jeopardy or threat of harm. This could include assessing residents, reviewing records, assessing environmental concerns, provide training to immediate staff. Date each task and if needed when task will be completed and who is responsible for completing the task (if a contractor or supplies need coordinated what day the service of goods available to the facility). 1. The facility undertook corrective action with regards to Resident #238 to confirm that a thorough investigation of the fall was completed and a report of an allegation of neglect was filed with HHSC on August 7, 2023. Resident #238 was discharged from the facility on August 3, 2023. 2. The Interim Director of Nursing/Designee audited all incident/accident reports of falls for the past thirty (30) days to confirm whether the following was done: o Proper nursing assessments were completed following the fall; o Physician was notified of the fall; o Family was notified of the fall; o All ordered interventions were performed and accurately documented; o The incident/accident report of the fall was accurately and completely filled out; and o The information about the fall was documented in the skilled nursing notes that are used to prepare the 24 Hour Report. 3. The facility confirmed that it has an existing process in place to investigate patient falls and to make appropriate reports of the falls to HHSC. The process includes: o The treating nurse documents the fall on the incident/accident report in [electronic medical records system]; o The treating nurse prepares the skilled nursing note documenting the fall, the patient assessment following the fall, and any ordered interventions; o The treating nurse collects witness statements, if any, and documents them on the incident/accident report; o The Interim Director of Nursing/Designee reviews the incident/accident report to confirm its completion and accuracy; o As part of the investigation of the fall, the Interim Director of Nursing/Designee interviews the resident and staff members. The findings of the interviews are documented on the incident/accident report; o The Interim Director of Nursing/Designee assesses the completion of the incident/accident report and the investigation to confirm that all of the details of the fall are included; that the physician and family have been notified; and that all ordered interventions have been completed; o The Interim Director of Nursing/Designee signs off on the incident/accident report as complete; o Fall events and the status of the residents' condition and investigation are discussed during daily Stand Up and Stand Down meetings; o Fall events and the status of the residents' condition and investigation are discussed during Grand Rounds; and o Based on the findings of the completed investigation and a determination that the resident's fall caused bodily injury that was suspicious for abuse or neglect, the Facility Administrator timely reports the fall event to HHSC as follows: i. Within two (2) hours of forming the suspicion if (a) there is a suspicion of abuse or (b) the fall resulted in serious bodily injury, or ii. Within twenty-four (24) hours if there is not a suspicion of abuse and the bodily injury was not serious. 4. The Quality Department has re-educated the Interim Director of Nursing/Designee and the Facility Administrator on the process to investigate patient falls and to make appropriate reports of the falls to HHSC as outlined in No. 3 above. 5. The Interim Director of Nursing/Designee has re-educated nursing staff members on recognizing the risk factors for falls, fall precautions, resident assessment, appropriate documentation, and how to properly escalate following falls. ***All staff members will be educated on the topics outlined above before being allowed to work a shift. ***The effectiveness of the re-education and the competency of the nursing staff will be measured by reviewing fallouts from the audits performed by the Director of Nursing/Designee and providing just-in-time re-education of the staff member responsible for the fallout. Also, for identified areas of non-compliance, staff members will be re-educated in mandatory staff meetings held monthly. Attendance at these meetings will be tracked. Finally, the facility, in collaboration with the Quality and Education Departments, is developing an annual competency tool, which will cover the topics in this Plan, along with other nursing skills/competencies. Completion Date: August 10, 2023 Facility's Plan to Ensure Compliance Quickly: How will the facility ensure compliance efficiently and timely? This could involve developing policies and procedures, training staff, repairing equipment, contacting physicians, having a QAIP meeting, developing forms, making repairs, or developing a new system. Be sure to document who provides the training, dates of training and how competency of staff of learning and training (return demonstrations, testing, competency checks). Please make sure dates of trainings are documented and if staff involvement is required that the staff member will not assume any job responsibilities until training has been received by them. Please make sure all audits, policies, notifications or services provided by outside contractors to remove the potential harm are dated. 1. The Interim Director of Nursing/Designee and the Director of Operations are reviewing relevant facility policies and procedures to determine whether revisions are necessary to be consistent with the outlined measures in this Plan. 2. By August 10, 2023, the Quality Department is re-educating the Interim Director of Nursing and the Facility Administrator of the process to investigate patient falls and to make appropriate reports of the falls to HHSC. The process includes: o The treating nurse documents the fall on the incident/accident report in [electronic medical records system]; o The treating nurse prepares the skilled nursing note documenting the fall, the patient assessment following the fall, and any ordered interventions; o The treating nurse collects [TRUNCATED]
CRITICAL (K)

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Deficiency F0697 (Tag F0697)

Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pain management consistent with professional ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pain management consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan and the residents' goals and preferences for 3 of 6 residents (Resident #238, Resident #235 and Resident #237) reviewed for pain management. - The facility failed to reassess and manage Resident #238's pain regimen resulting in a decline in therapy due to her pain described as unbearable and worse than having a baby. - The facility failed to send prescriptions to the pharmacy timely upon admission and administer pain medication to Resident #235; the facility failed to assess Resident #235's pain following medication administration and failed to notify the resident's provider of ineffective pain control. Resident #235 suffered from pain up to 10 out of 10. - The facility failed to send prescriptions to the pharmacy timely upon admission and administer pain medication to Resident #237; the facility failed to assess Resident #237's pain following medication administration and failed to notify the resident's provider of ineffective pain control. Resident #237 reported pain up to 07 out of 10. On 08/03/23 09:20 AM an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified. While the IJ was removed on 08/09/23 at 12:53 PM, the facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of actual harm and a scope of pattern due to the facility continuing to monitor the implementation and effectiveness of their plan of removal These failures could place residents at risk for uncontrolled, irretractable pain, and decreased quality of life. Findings included: Record review of Resident #238's Face Sheet date 08/11/23 revealed, a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included; type 2 diabetes, UTI, unspecified fall and back fracture. The resident transferred to the hospital on [DATE] for acute care Record review of Resident #238's Baseline Care Plan dated 07/21/23 revealed, the resident planned to return to her own home following rehabilitation, one person physical assist with most ADLs, always continent of both bladder and bowel, and a history of falls. Record review of Resident #238's admission MDS dated [DATE] revealed, intact cognition as indicated by a BIMS score of 15 out of 15. Record review of Resident #238's Hospital Discharge Record dated 07/21/23 revealed, the resident was treated for a wedge compression fracture of the chest and spine following a fall that required spinal surgery. Record review of Resident #238's Assessments dated 07/23/23 revealed, resident had a recent fall and was identified as having a high risk of falls per her fall risk assessment. Record review of Resident #238's Progress Notes dated 07/28/23 at 3:09 PM signed by RN C revealed, Resident #238 complained of pain to right thigh/leg and then complained about severe pain to left thigh and leg. Record review of Resident #238's Xray Final Report printed on 07/28/23 at 05:33 PM revealed, Xray left femur- left femur intertrochanteric (where the leg bone meets the hip bone) fracture. Record review of Resident #238's progress notes from 07/29/23 to 08/02/23 revealed, 07/30/23 at 06:42 AM signed by RN H- general pain at 6/10, there was no documentation of notification to the provider. 07/30/23 at 05:03 PM signed by RN J- at 05:00 PM resident complained of pain in her left leg. there was no documentation of notification to the provider. 07/30/23 at 10:00 PM signed by RNG- general pain at 6/10 there was no documentation of notification to the provider. 07/31/23 at 04:09 AM signed by RN G- general pain at 5/10; there was no documentation of notification to the provider. 08/01/23- no nursing notes about the resident's pain 08/02/23- no nursing notes about the resident's pain Record review of Resident #238's Physicians Orders revealed, on 07/28/23 the resident was prescribed Tramadol 50 mg every 6 hours for pain and the order was changed to every 8 hours for pain on 07/31/23. on 07/31/23 the resident was prescribed Ibuprofen 400 mg three times a day. There were no new orders for scheduled pain medicines entered after 07/31/23. Record review of Resident #238's OT Daily note dated 07/31/23 revealed, Resident #238 refused to get out of the room to do therapy in the gym. The resident reported pain to her left leg 9/10 on the pain scale. Resident #238 refused to do any standing exercises or activities and was highly sensitive with lower extremity movement. The Physician ordered Tramadol 50 mg 1 tablet every 6 hours for pain. Record review of Resident #238's Provider Progress Note effective date 08/01/23 signed by NP A at 12:03 AM revealed, Therapy staff at bedside, resident sitting in wheelchair, leaning over to her knees and refusing to straighten her. Therapy attempted to straighten her but refusing to sit upright, reporting pain to left leg, had a fall earlier. But after further attempt, resident was able to sit up in wheelchair. Reporting pain and staff reporting increased anxiety, night nurse reported that she gave an extra dose of BuSpar. Resident #238 was taking tramadol 50 mg tablet - Take 1 tablet by mouth every six hours as needed ordered. Record review of Resident #238's OT Daily note dated 08/01/23 revealed, Resident #238 continued to report pain to her left leg at 9/10 on the pain scale. Any slight movement intensifies pain. Increased lower extremity swelling and pain to the left leg restricts movement. Record review of Resident #238's OT Daily note dated 08/02/23 revealed, Resident #238 refused to do any standing or lower extremities exercises/movement. The resident was agreeable to perform upper extremity exercises. Resident #238 refused to do toilet training and upper body/lower-body ADLs due to her pain being unbearable. The resident said it's worse than having a baby. Record review of Resident #238's PT Daily note dated 08/02/23 revealed, patient unable to move lower left extremity due to increase pain. Patient unable to stand due to increase pain in left hip and knee. Resident #238 stated 9/10 pain on left hip, knee, and below knee nursing notified about the pain. There was no documentation of the resident having a fracture. Record review of Resident #238's Provider Progress Notes dated 08/02/23 revealed, Resident #238 had edema (swelling) to left lower leg and reported pain when examined. Ongoing edema with the pain, concerned about bone/soft tissue involvement, requested a stat x-ray but resident declined. Resident continues to report pain to the left leg but phone call, previous x-ray was negative. Continue tramadol as needed, ibuprofen 3 times a day until 8/10/2023. The note was signed by NP A on 08/08/23 at 12:00 AM. Record review of Resident #238's Provider Progress Note dated 08/03/23 signed by NP A at 12:04 AM revealed, Resident continues to have pain, has been difficulty putting weight onto the left leg. Currently on tramadol and ibuprofen scheduled alternatingly, with no benefits. The resident was sent out to the hospital. In an interview on 08/07/23 at 12:36 PM, MD A said Identification of Resident #238's femur fracture from 07/28/23 was missed from top to bottom. She said once the fracture was identified on 08/03/23 the resident was sent out to the hospital immediately because the facility cannot manage a hip fracture without first receiving an orthopedic consult. MD A said NP A was responsible for receiving the xray results from 07/28/23 and was managing the patient with Tramadol and Ibuprofen scheduled every 6 hours. In an interview on 08/07/23 at 12:50 PM, NP A NP A said during her clinical assessment the resident presented with a swollen leg which was suspicious for a fracture and was also experiencing a decline in function and increased pain. In an interview on 08/07/23 at 02:06 PM, the Rehab Director said upon admission Resident #238 was not bad and she experienced falls on 07/23/23 and 07/28/23. He said there was no change in the resident after her fall on 07/23/23 but when she sustained a fall on 07/28/23 which led to a drastic change in function. He said Resident #238 went from just requiring supervision with ADLs/ambulation at admission to requiring 2 people maximum assistance following the fall, and the resident reported pain on a scale from 06-9 with movement. The Rehab Director said after the fall on 07/28/23 the resident drastically was not able to meet her therapy goal. In an interview on 08/08/23 at 06:58 AM, LVN A said on 07/28/23 she walked into the room and found Resident #238 on the floor by the unoccupied resident's bed. She said Resident #238 didn't know what happened. She said the facility policy requires a head to toe assessment including the resident's ROM prior to moving the resident as well as neuro checks. She said she was unable to assess Resident #238's left leg ROM because the resident would not allow her to touch it. LVN A said Resident #238 said it hurt and told the staff not to move her. She said Resident #238 said the pain was really bad in her hip and when the staff tried to get her to lie down she refused. LVN A said in retrospect the resident should not have been moved from the floor since she was in severe pain and her ROM could not be assessed and the resident should have been sent out to the hospital. LVN A could not answer why she didn't send Resident #238 out. In an interview on 08/09/23 at 09:16 AM, RN C said that during the week of 07/28/23 Resident #238 complained of pain in her thighs and leg. In an interview on 08/09/23 at 11:04 PM, the Rehab director said Resident #238 experienced a decline in therapy due to her continuous pain after the fall on 07/28/23 so he discussed the resident with the prescriber the morning meeting on 08/02/23 he requested another xray be performed. He said he talked to NP A who said she would enter in an order for an xray but she did not so he followed up with MD A. He said MD A said she would enter in an order for an xray on 08/02/23, so on the morning of 08/03/23 he logged on to the radiology portal in anticipation of the results and that is when he saw the report dated 07/28/23 that identified Resident #238's left femur fracture. The Rehab Director said he immediately printed out the results and turn it over to the IP and Administrator. In an interview on 08/11/23 at 11:09 AM, the Medical Director said the facility has designated nurses/DON to communicate results of a fracture or any negative acute findings verbally to the provider. He said failure to timely identify and notify the provider of an acute fracture could place residents at risk for a decreased quality of life, uncontrolled pain, infection and psychological distress. In an interview on 08/14/23 at 09:03 AM , NP A said on 07/28/23 she received a group of texts from RN C with results from Resident #238's x-rays as well as others. She said she briefly looked over it and missed the left femur fracture that was identified on one of the many pictures RN C sent. NP A said following the fall Resident #238 showed symptoms of a fracture and she wanted to perform additional x-rays but the resident refused so she did not enter in another order. She said Resident #238 appeared confused, had swelling in her leg with pain. NP A said Resident #238 was complaining off and on of pain and she was treated with pain medication. She said the Resident #238 did not give the impression that she did not have a fracture but since the resident refused further radiology scans she did not enter new orders for x-rays even though the patient was symptomatic. NP A said Resident #238's fracture was not identified until 08/03/23 (6 days after the fall). NP A said unidentified fracture results can happen and the facility its best but failure to identify a fracture could place residents at risk for pain until the fracture is addressed, a further decrease in quality of care. In an interview on 08/16/23 at 10:32 AM, the Interim DON said there are pharmacological and non-pharmacological methods to manage residents' pain. She said proper pain management involves the acquisition of medications, timely administration of the medications, proper post administration assessments, as well as notification and documentation of ineffective pain control. The interim DON said that the facility identified discrepancies in medication administration times, acquisitions of medications, timely reassessment, provider escalation and documentation in their pain management program. She said failure to manage residents pain thoroughly and the above deficient practices could place residents at risk of uncontrolled/unretractable pain, worsening/decline of health, decreased quality of life, and slowed recovery due to the inability to complete therapy. The Interim DON said that upon a resident's admission nurses are expected to receive the order, reconcile the medications determining the first dose, identify any discrepancies and escalate and clarify all issues. She said over the survey the facility had identified discrepancies in the first doses of medications administered either through incorrect data entry or unavailable medications. The Interim DON said failure to enter and receive admissions orders could place residents at risk for worsening of condition, uncontrolled pain as well as a decreased therapeutic effect of prescribed medications. The Interim said that neglect was a failure to provide services such as: failure to properly assess residents following a fall and timely identifying negative radiology/laboratory findings. She said during the survey process the facility had identified discrepancies in the fall program and radiology reporting system and these failures could place residents at risk for delay in diagnosis of problems, delay in treatment, uncontrolled pain and death. Resident #235 Record review of Resident #235's face sheet dated 06/28/23 revealed, a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: acute kidney failure, UTI and unspecified fall. The resident discharged on 07/18/23. Record review of Resident #235's secondary Face Sheet dated 06/28/23 at 10:28 AM revealed, Resident #235 admitted to the facility on [DATE] at 09:01 PM. Record review of Resident #235's Baseline Care Plan dated 06/27/23 revealed, the resident was alert & oriented and experiencing generalized aching pain Record review of Resident #235's Hospital H & P dated 06/27/23 revealed, Resident #235 had an accidental fall, abdominal pain, small hernia and chronic pain disorder. Record review of Resident #235's Hospital Discharge Record dated 06/27/23 at 03:45 PM revealed, Resident #235's next scheduled dose of pain medications as follows: - Morphine 15 mg ER (an opioid pain medication)- 1 tablet be mouth every six hours with next dose due on 06/27/23 at 09:00 PM. - Oxycodone 10 mg (an opioid pain medication)- 1 Tablet by mouth every 6 hours with next dose due on 06/27/23 at 06:00 PM. Record review of Resident #235's Order Summary Report dated 06/28/23 revealed, - Morphine Sulfate 15 mg- give 1 tablet by mouth every 12 hours for pain ordered on 06/27/23 with a start date of 06/28/23. - Oxycodone 10 mg- give 1 tablet by mouth every 6 hours for pain ordered on 06/27/23 with a start date of 06/28/23 - Acetaminophen 650- 1 tablet by mouth every 8 hours as needed for pain starting 06/27/23 at 10:45 PM. Record review of Resident #235's Progress Note dated 06/28/23 revealed - 01:16 AM- resident came in after 9 pm, [automated medication dispensing machine] does not have name. - 04:19 AM - complaint of pain to legs - 05:25 AM- no medication on hand - 05:56 AM- Resident #235 was informed that the MD was notified for prescriptions to be sent to the pharmacy. Resident #235 informed the facility that she had her Morphine and Oxycodone at home and she asked if her son brought them to the facility could the facility staff administer it. Record review of Resident #235's June MAR printed 06/28/23 at 12:50 PM revealed, her medications were not started until 06/28/23 and the following medications were not administered: - Oxycodone 10 mg- give 1 tablet by mouth every 6 hours due at 06/28/23 at 12:00 AM. The start date was not entered until 06/28/23 at 06:00 AM. - Oxycodone 10 mg- give 1 tablet by mouth every 6 hours scheduled for 06/28/23 at 06:00 AM. Reason not administered- medication not available. - Morphine Sulfate 15 mg ER- give 1 tablet by mouth every 12 hours for pain due at 06/27/23 at 09:00 PM. The Order was entered incorrectly as Morphine Sulfate 15 mg (IR) with a start date of 06/28/23 at 08:00 AM Record review of Resident #235's Pharmacy Records dated 06/28/23 revealed, MD A did not submit electronic prescriptions for Resident #235's Oxycodone 10 mg and Morphine ER 15 mg until 06/28/23 at 05:31 PM, over 20 hours after the resident's admission. Record review of Resident #235's June MAR dated 06/28/23 at 12:50 PM revealed the following pain scores: - 05 out of 10 when Resident was administered her only dose of Acetaminophen 650 mg on 06/28/23 at 04:19 AM - 10 out of 10 when Resident was administered her Morphine 15 mg scheduled for 08:00 AM. - 08 out of 10 when Resident was administered her first dose of Oxycodone 10 mg scheduled for 12:00 PM. Record review of Resident #235's Physician's Notes from 06/27/23 to 07/18/23 revealed, no documentation of reported ineffective pain management, uncontrolled pain or pain scores that remained the same after medication administration by nursing staff. Record review of Resident #235's June Progress Notes revealed, no documentation of unchanged or increased pain scores which indicated ineffective pain management and no documentation of MD notification of inefficient pain management. No documentation of post medication administration pain assessments to determine if the medication administered was effective. Record review of Resident #235's Oxycodone 10 mg ER June MAR revealed, - increased pain recorded on 06/28/23 between 06:00 AM and 12:00 PM doses from an 3 to an 8 out of 10. - unchanged pain recorded on 06/28/23 between 12:00 PM and 08:00 PM doses at an 8 out of 10. - unchanged pain recorded on 06/29/23 between 12:00 AM and 06:00 AM doses at a 5 out of 10. - increased pain recorded on 06/29/23 between 06:00 AM and 12:00 PM doses from an 5 to a 7 out of 10. - increased pain recorded on 06/29/23 between 12:00 AM and 06:00 PM doses from an 7 to an 8 out of 10. - unchanged pain recorded on 06/30/23 between 12:00 AM and 06:00 AM doses at a 5 out of 10. Record review of Resident #235' July Progress Notes revealed, no documentation of unchanged or increased pain scores which indicate ineffective pain management and no documentation of MD notification of inefficient pain management. No documentation of post medication administration pain assessments to determine if the medication administered was effective. Record review of Resident #235's Oxycodone 10 mg ER July MAR revealed, - increased pain from a 0 to a 4 out of 10 on 07/03/23 between 06:00 PM to 07/0/423 at 12:00 AM doses. - increased pain from a 0 to a 5 out of 10 on 07/04/23 between 12:00 Pm to 06:00 PM doses. - increased pain from a 3 to an 8 out of 10 on 07/06/23 between 12:00 PM to 06:00 PM doses. - increased pain from a 2 to an 9 out of 10 on 07/07/23 between 12:00 PM to 06:00 PM doses. - unchanged pain at 5 out of 10 recorded on 07/08/23 between 12:00 AM and 06:00 AM doses. - unchanged pain at 5 out of 10 recorded on 07/09/23 between 12:00 AM and 06:00 AM doses. - increased pain from a 5 to an 6 out of 10 on 07/09/23 between 06:00 AM to 12:00 PM doses. - unchanged pain at 6 out of 10 recorded on 07/09/23 between 12:00 PM and 06:00 PM doses. - increased pain from a 3 to an 8 out of 10 on 07/11/23 between 06:00 AM to 12:00 PM doses. - increased pain from a 2 to an 9 out of 10 on 07/12/23 between 06:00 AM to 12:00 PM doses. Record review of Resident #235's Medication Administration Audit from 06/27/23 to 07/18/23 dated 08/03/23 revealed, the resident received her Oxycodone and Morphine outside of scheduled administration times on 23 different occasions during her stay and there were no documented reasons for the late doses: 1- Morphine ER 15 mg scheduled for 06/28/23 at 08:00 AM, administered at 09:15 PM; The medication was not available 2- Morphine ER 15 mg scheduled for 06/30/23 at 08:00 PM, administered at 9:33 PM; There was no documented reason for the late administration. 3- Morphine ER 15 mg scheduled for 07/01/23 at 08:00 AM, administered at 09:05 PM; There was no documented reason for the late administration. 4- Oxycodone 10 mg scheduled for 07/02/23 at 06:00 PM, administered at 7:11 PM; There was no documented reason for the late administration. 5- Morphine ER 15 mg scheduled for 07/02/23 at 08:00 PM, administered at 11:32 PM; There was no documented reason for the late administration. 6- Morphine ER 15 mg scheduled for 07/03/23 at 08:00 PM, administered at 09:58 PM: There was no documented reason for the late administration. 7- Oxycodone 10 mg scheduled for 07/04/23 at 06:00 AM, administered at 7:05 AM; There was no documented reason for the late administration. 8- Morphine ER 15 mg scheduled for 07/04/23 at 08:00 AM, administered at 09:15 AM; There was no documented reason for the late administration. 9- Morphine ER 15 mg scheduled for 07/04/23 at 08:00 PM, administered at 10:44 PM: There was no documented reason for the late administration. 10- Morphine ER 15 mg scheduled for 07/06/23 at 08:00 AM, administered at 09:19 AM; There was no documented reason for the late administration. 11- Morphine ER 15 mg scheduled for 07/06/23 at 08:00 PM, administered at 09:20 PM; There was no documented reason for the late administration. 12- Morphine ER 15 mg scheduled for 07/07/23 at 08:00 AM, administered at 11:53AM; There was no documented reason for the late administration. 13- Morphine ER 15 mg scheduled for 07/07/23 at 08:00 PM, administered at 09:03 PM; There was no documented reason for the late administration. 14- Morphine ER 15 mg scheduled for 07/08/23 at 08:00 AM, administered at 11:03AM; There was no documented reason for the late administration. 15- Morphine ER 15 mg scheduled for 07/08/23 at 08:00 PM, administered at 10:07 PM; There was no documented reason for the late administration. 16- Morphine ER 15 mg scheduled for 07/09/23 at 08:00 AM, administered at 09:30AM; There was no documented reason for the late administration. 17- Morphine ER 15 mg scheduled for 07/10/23 at 08:00 PM, administered at 09:05 PM; There was no documented reason for the late administration. 18- Oxycodone 10 mg scheduled on 07/12/23 at 12:00 AM, administered at 3:16 AM; There was no documented reason for the late administration. 19- Oxycodone 10 mg scheduled for 07/14/23 at 12:00 PM, administered at 02:17 PM; The medication ran out of refills. 20- Morphine ER 15 mg scheduled for 07/16/23 at 08:00 AM, administered at 10:05 AM 21- Oxycodone 10 mg scheduled for 07/17/23 at 06:00 PM, administered at 07:30 PM; There was no documented reason for the late administration. 22- Morphine ER 15 mg scheduled for 07/17/23 at 08:00 PM, administered at 09:12 PM; There was no documented reason for the late administration. 23- Morphine ER 15 mg scheduled for 07/18/23 at 08:00 AM, administered at 09:03 AM; There was no documented reason for the late administration. Record review of Resident #235's Progress Notes dated 07/18/23 revealed resident discharged home with home health care. An observation on 06/28/23 at 08:45 AM revealed, Resident #235's family member approaching RN B while she prepared for medication administration to Resident #235. He said that he was very upset with the facility because prior to admission he was assured that Resident #235's medication would be available upon her admission but it was not. He said Resident #235 called him multiple times overnight to inform him that she had not received any of her medication since she arrived at the facility and she was in severe pain. Resident #235's family member then handed RN B 2 bottles of medication (Morphine ER 15 mg and Oxycodone 10 mg) and said he brought only a 2 days' supply to cover Resident #235 until the medication arrived at the facility. After Resident #235's family member entered the resident's room, RN B alerted the Interim DON to the arrival of the mediation at which point they both counted the medications and logged them into individual control sheets. In an interview on 06/28/23 at 10:10 AM, RN B said Resident #235 admitted to the facility on the night shift of 06/27/23. She said the patient's medications had not yet arrived from the pharmacy and the night shift nurse said Resident #235's family member would be bringing her pain medication so she was waiting for its arrival. When asked if RN B could have pulled the rest of Resident #235's unavailable medication from the facility EKit (floor stock of prescription medications available for emergency use), she said she administered the OTC medications as well as the pain medication brought in by the family member but she would have to check the facility EKit for the rest of Resident #235's medications. RN B said she immediately administered Morphine ER 15 mg to Resident #235 once it was delivered by the resident's family member but the Oxycodone was not due yet. She could not say when Resident #235 received her last dose of Oxycodone, but she could not administer it due to the scheduled time in the MAR. RN B said failure to administer medications as ordered could place residents at risk for uncontrolled disease states such as uncontrolled pain. In an interview on 06/28/23 at 10:35 AM, the Interim DON said when a resident arrived at the facility the admitting nurse is expected to review the hospital paperwork to verify the last dose of medications received as well as when the next dose is due. She said the nurse then enters the order into the system and verifies it with the physician. The Interim DON said Resident #235 admitted to the facility on [DATE] at around 08:30 PM so her medications were not yet delivered by the pharmacy. She said that the expectation was for residents to receive their medications as ordered and that the nurse should have taken into consideration Resident #235's last doses to determine when the next dose was due and to at least get an order for a one-time dose to ensure that the resident received her medications. The interim DON said if a CII medication ( scheduled 2 controlled substances that require additional care because of the potential to intentionally or unintentionally abuse the drug) was unavailable nursing staff are expected to request an appropriate alternative treat the patients pain and most other medications could be found in the e-kit until the medication arrived. The Interim DON said that failure to administer medication to residents as ordered could place residents at risk for uncontrolled disease states and pain. In an observation and interview on 06/28/23 at 11:11 AM, Resident #235 said she discharged from the hospital on [DATE] at 04:00 PM but she did not get picked up by the transport company until after 08:00 PM so by the time she arrived at the facility her medications were already due. She said when she arrived at the facility she explained to the staff that since she was discharged from the hospital at 4:00 PM the hospital was unable to administer any of her medications due after 4:00 PM. Resident #235 said she asked for her medications especially her pain medication but she was told the medication was not available at the facility. She said she specifically asked for her pain medications Morphine and Oxycodone because her pain was a 10 out of 10 but it was unavailable so her son had to bring in her pain medication in the morning (06/28/23). Resident #235 said she was in severe pain rendering her unable to do anything and writhing in pain prior to receiving her Morphine morning. She said after receiving her Morphine her pain was at 08 out of 10 but she had still not received her Oxycodone. The observation of Resident #238's facial expressions showed no sign of grimacing or discomfort. In an interview on 08/02/23 at 01:56 PM, LVN B said resident pain can be assessed based on verbalization of pain on a scale of 0-10. She said the pain level is documented prior to administration of the pain medication but there is no trigger to document a post administration assessment in the EMR for scheduled medication. LVN B said nursing staff are expected to assess the patients pain level 30 minutes - 1 hr. after administration of the medication and document it in the progress notes. She said if a resident was assessed to have increase or unchanged pain levels then the medication was not effective and the provider must be notified. LVN B said Resident #235 was generally pleasant and she had been taking Oxycodone for a long time. She said she could not recall any issues with Resident #235's pain management but she did remember that the residents facial expressions did not match the level of pain she reported. In an interview on 08/13/23 at 08:03 AM, RN E said she was the admitting nurse for Resident #235 on 06/28/23. She said when the resident admitted to the facility she entered reconciled the medications with the provider, including the Resident #235's pain medications Oxycodone and Morphine. She said when she notified the provider, the provider stated that late admissions always resulted in problems with CII medication acquisition because they were unable to electronically prescribe the medications. She said she asked for an alternative and the provider gave an order for Tylenol and nothing else. RN E said Acetaminophen was not sufficient pain control for patients on opioid medications but that was the medication ordered for the resident upon admission. Resident #237 Record review of Resident #237's Nurse report dated 07/26/23 revealed, Resident #237 arrived at the facility at 7 pm. Record review of Resident #237's Face Sheet dated 08/11/23 revealed, a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility with diagnoses of: atrial fibrillation (irregular heartbeat), acute kidney failure, opioid dependence, anemia, hypertension (high blood pressure) and type 2 diabetes. The resident discharged from the facility on 08/05/23. Record review of Resident #237's admission MDS dated [DATE] revealed, intact cognition as indicated by a BIMS score of 15 out of 15, supervision with most ADLs, occasionally incontinent of bladder and always continent of bowel. Yes- resident received scheduled and PRN pain medication in the last 5 days as well as received non-medication intervention for pain. Resident #237 reported frequent pain and the worst pain reported was a 5 out of 10. Record review of Resident #237's Baseline Care Plan dated 07/26/23 and signed by RN F revealed, admission goals to return to the family home, one person assist with most ADLs, wheelchair use, always continent of both bladder and bowel. Physician orders for opioids was not selected, presence of pain was documented as no. Record review of Resident #237's Hospital D[TRUNCATED]
CRITICAL (K) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Deficiency F0726 (Tag F0726)

Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure nurse aides are able to demonstrate competency...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure nurse aides are able to demonstrate competency in skills and techniques necessary to care for residents' needs for 6 of 15 staff ( LVN A, LVN B, LVN C, RN B, RN C and RN F) and 6 of 13 residents ( Resident #26, Resident #235, Resident #236, Resident #237, Resident #238 and Resident #270) reviewed for nursing competency. - The facility failed to ensure nursing staff failed to properly assess Resident #238 following a fall, identify a femur fracture, and properly notify the provider of a fracture for 6 days following a fall; leaving the resident in pain up to 09 out of 10. - The facility failed to ensure nursing staff entered admission orders accurately, timely, acquired medications, accurately assessed pain and notified the MD of ineffective pain control following pain medication administration for Resident #235 and Resident #237; leaving the residents in pain from 07 to 10 out of 10. - The facility failed to ensure nursing staff failed to enter accurately and timely acquire/administer medications to Resident #236. - The facility failed to ensure nursing staff failed to accurately enter the start time of Resident #26's medication at re-admission from the hospital. - The facility failed to ensure nursing staff failed to accurately enter the start time of Resident #270's medication at admission. On 08/09/23 12:15 PM an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified. While the IJ was removed on 08/15/23 at 03:48 PM, the facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of actual harm and a scope of pattern due to the facility continuing to monitor the implementation and effectiveness of their plan of removal. These failures could affect residents at risk for uncontrolled pain, severe injury, delated treatment and death. Findings included: Record review of the facility's Nurse New/Annual Competency Skills Assessment revealed, nursing competencies were not assessed annually and the staff completed self-assessments regarding reporting/documentation, medications, physical assessment, documentation, and computer skills for network, EMR, and radiology/laboratory lab results portal. Staff were not assessed by any member of nursing administration. - RN D last self assessed her competency skills on 11/05/21 as I have performed many times in the last 5 years. No further review necessary. - LVN B last self assessed her competency skills on 11/20/20 as I have performed many times in the last 5 years. No further review necessary. - RN C last self assessed her competency skills on an undocumented date as I have performed many times in the last 5 years. No further review necessary. - RN F last self assessed her competency skills on 03/09/22 as I have performed many times in the last 5 years. No further review necessary. -- LVN A last self assessed her competency skills on 01/26/22 as I have seen and/or read but have not had an opportunity to perform regarding documentation, abuse and neglect training, resident respect and rights training, Neurovascular assessments, documentation ( transcription/confirmation of MD orders in EMR, admission assessments, incident reports, SNF/LTC protocols skin assessments, functional assessments and mini mental assessments. I have performed three (3) times or less- general/admission assessments and neurological assessments. I have performed many times but not in the last (5) years for oral, subcutaneous (under the skin) and intramuscular medications. - RN A last self assessed her competency skills on 11/02/21 as I have performed many times in the last 5 years. No further review necessary. - RN E last self assessed her competency skills on 12/06/18 as I have performed many times in the last 5 years. No further review necessary> In an interview on 08/15/23 at 04:00 PM, the Corporate Quality Manager said that during the survey the facility identified that annual competency checks were not completed by nurse management. She said nurses were allowed to self-assess their skills but they were assigned training in an online learning management system as applicable. The Corporate Quality Manager said that the online trainings had tests at the end of each course but there was no actual check off/sign off of nursing competencies completed by facility administration prior to nursing staff working on the floor. She said going forward, nursing competencies would be validated. Resident #238 Record review of Resident #238's Face Sheet date 08/11/23 revealed, a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included; type 2 diabetes, UTI, unspecified fall and back fracture. The resident transferred to an acute care facility on 08/03/23. Record review of Resident #238's admission MDS dated [DATE] revealed, intact cognition as indicated by a BIMS score of 15 out of 15. Record review of Resident #238's Baseline Care Plan dated 07/21/23 revealed, the resident planned to return to her own home following rehabilitation, one person physical assist with most ADLs, always continent of both bladder and bowel, and a history of falls. Record review of Resident #238's Accident/Incident Report dated 07/23/23 signed by LVN A revealed, the resident was found on the floor of th restroom besides the toilet. The patient said she fell while trying to wash her hands, she hit her butt pretty hard and her back really hurts, hell everything hurts. Record review of Resident #238's Progress Notes dated 07/23/23 at 05:18 AM signed by LVN A revealed, the resident was found on the bathroom floor and reported her butt and back really hurt. The resident was assessed for new injuries and none were discovered. The resident reported pain at 9 out of 10 and NP A gave an order for Acetaminophen 500 mg to be administered for pain,. There was no documentation of the resident's ROM or initiation of Neurochecks. Record review of Resident #238's Accident/Incident Report dated 07/28/23 signed by LVN A revealed, the resident was found on the floor screaming in pain. Resident #238 could not remember how she got to the floor. Record review of Resident #238's Progress Notes dated 07/28/23 at 05:38 AM signed by LVN A revealed, Resident #238 was found lying on the floor near her walker and the vacant bed. Resident was screaming in pain and was assisted into a chair by staff members and the resident complained of left leg and hip pain. NP A w and as notified and she gave orders for a STAT xray and administration of Acetaminophen. There was no documentation of neuro checks being initiated, specific of a head to toe assessment or assessment of Resident #238's ROM. Record review of Resident 238's paper and electronic chart revealed, LVN A did not perform any neuro checks on the resident following her falls on 07/23/23 or 07/28/23. There was no follow-up documented following Resident #238's fall on 07/23/23. LVN A did not complete a fall risk assessment for Resident #238's fall on 07/28/23. There was no follow-up documented following Resident #238's fall on 07/28/23 Record review of Resident #238's Progress Notes dated 07/28/23 at 3:09 PM signed by RN C revealed, Resident #238 complained of pain to right thigh/leg and then complained about severe pain to left thigh and leg. The resident was seen by the NP and new orders were given for Tramadol (pain medication) and labs. The xray tech reported Resident #238 was not corporative during the first xray so the patient had to be taken to the xray department. Record review of Resident #238's Xray Final Report printed on 07/28/23 at 05:33 PM revealed, Xray left femur- left femur intertrochanteric (where the leg bone meets the hip bone) fracture. Record review of text conversation between RN C and NP A dated 07/28/23 revealed, RN C sent pictures to NP A of Resident #238's xray report that indicated a left femur fracture at 06:24 AM. At 07/28/23 a 06:38 PM NP A responded back with looks normal. Record review of Resident #238's Physician's Order written 07/28/23 revealed, X-ray Right Femur and Right Leg for post fall pain one time only until 07/28/23 at 23:59 PM. There was no order entered for the left leg/hip and there was only 1 order entered on 07/28/23. Record review of Resident #238's Progress Notes from 07/28/23 to 08/02/23 revealed, no documentation of the resident's xray finding of left femur fracture and no documented notification to the physician of the pending xray results. Record review of Resident #238's OT Daily note dated 07/31/23 revealed, Resident #238 refused to get out of the room to do therapy in the gym. The resident reported pain to her left leg 9/10 on the pain scale. Resident #238 refused to do any standing exercises or activities and was highly sensitive with lower extremity movement. There was no documentation of the resident having a fracture. Record review of Resident #238's OT Daily note dated 08/01/23 revealed, Resident #238 continued to report pain to her left leg at 9/10 on the pain scale. Any slight movement intensifies pain. Increased lower extremity swelling and pain to the left leg restricts movement. There was no documentation of the resident having a fracture. Record review of Resident #238's OT Daily note dated 08/02/23 revealed, Resident #238 refused to do any standing or lower extremities exercises/movement. The resident was agreeable to perform upper extremity exercises. Resident #238 refused to do toilet training and upper body/lower-body ADLs due to her pain being unbearable. The resident said it's worse than having a baby. There was no documentation of the resident having a fracture. Record review of Resident #238's PT Daily note dated 08/02/23 revealed, patient unable to move lower left extremity due to increase pain. Patient unable to stand due to increase pain in left hip and knee. Resident #238 stated 9/10 pain on left hip, knee, and below knee nursing notified about the pain. There was no documentation of the resident having a fracture. Record review of Resident #238's Physician Notes dated 08/02/23 revealed, Resident #238 had edema (swelling) to left lower leg and reported pain when examined. Ongoing edema with the pain, concerned about bone/soft tissue involvement, requested a stat x-ray but resident declined. Resident continues to report pain to the left leg but phone call, previous x-ray was negative. The note was signed by NP A on 08/08/23 at 12:00 AM. Record review of Resident #238's Physician Notes dated 08/03/23 revealed, X-ray reviewed showed left hip fracture, Resident #238 continues to have pain and had difficulty putting weight on the left leg. The resident was on tramadol and ibuprofen on an alternating schedule with no benefits. The note was signed by MD A on 08/06/23 at 3:07 PM. In an interview on 08/07/23 at 12:36 PM, MD A said Identification of Resident #238's femur fracture from 07/28/23 was missed from top to bottom. She said once the fracture was identified on 08/03/23 the resident was sent out to the hospital immediately because the facility cannot manage a hip fracture without first receiving an orthopedic consult. MD A said NP A was responsible for receiving the xray results from 07/28/23 and was managing the patient with Tramadol and Ibuprofen scheduled every 6 hours. In an interview on 08/07/23 at 12:50 PM, NP A said Resident #238. NP A said on Friday 07/28/23 she received a call saying Resident #238's x rays were negative for fracture and she did not receive a second call notifying her of the fracture. She said during her clinical assessment the resident presented with a swollen leg which was suspicious for a fracture and was also experiencing a decline in function and increased pain. NP A said when a provider places an order for an Xray, nursing staff are expected to enter the orders and once the test are completed notification must be provided to the NP/MD by phone notification. In an interview on 08/07/23 at 02:06 PM, the Therapy Manager said upon admission Resident #238 was not bad and she experienced falls on 07/23/23 and 07/28/23. He said there was no change in the resident after her fall on 07/23/23 but when she sustained a fall on 07/28/23 which led to a drastic change in function. He said Resident #238 went from just requiring supervision with ADLs/ambulation at admission to requiring 2 people maximum assistance following the fall, and the resident reported pain on a scale from 06-9 with movement. In an interview on 08/07/23 at 5:34 PM, the DON said after Resident #238's fall on 07/28/23 the resident received 2 xray results but there was no order entered for the 2nd xray so she couldn't track it. She said all xray results should be reviewed by the nurse and the physician should be notified via a phone call of the findings. The DON said failure to identify xray results timely could result in a delay in treatment, the resident developing a clot from the fracture and uncontrolled pain. In an interview on 08/08/23 at 06:58 AM, LVN A said on 07/28/23 she walked into the room and found Resident #238 on the floor by the unoccupied resident's bed. She said Resident #238 didn't know what happened. She said the facility policy requires a head to toe assessment including the resident's ROM prior to moving the resident as well as neuro checks. LVN A said she did not initiate neuro checks on Resident #238 after the fall because she forgot and the fall occurred almost at the time of her shift. She said she was unable to assess Resident #238's left leg ROM because the resident would not allow her to touch it. LVN A said Resident #238 said it hurt and told the staff not to move her. She said Resident #238 said the pain was really bad in her hip and when the staff tried to get her to lie down she refused. LVN A said in retrospect the resident should not have been moved from the floor since she was in severe pain and her ROM could not be assessed. She said failure to assess residents properly following a fall could place residents at risk for fracture, infection, discomfort, neurological issues if the resident hit their heat and development of a blood clot at the site of the fracture. LVN A said she could not remember the specifics of Resident #238's fall on 07/23/23. In an interview on 08/09/23 at 08:40 AM, the Interim DON said following a fall nursing staff must immediately assess residents for injury including ROM assessments prior to moving the resident, any bleeding and initiation of neurological checks. She said the resident must be followed for 72 hours to ensure no injuries occurred. She said she has noticed that some nurses are not performing neuro checks following falls and LVN A did not initiate neuro checks on Resident #238 following her falls on 07/23/23 and 07/28/23. In an interview on 08/09/23 at 09:16 AM, RN C said that during the week of 07/28/23 Resident #238 complained of pain in her thighs and leg. She said earlier in the morning of 07/28/23 an X-ray tech came to the resident's room to perform an xray of Resident #238's hip but the resident wasn't corporation so a CNA had to assist the xray tech RN C said since the resident was non-complaint during the previous xray the resident had to be taken to the hospital on the evening of 07/28/23. She said when the results came back she took pictures of the xray results and sent it to the NP A who reviewed the results and said everything was ok. RN C said she never read the xray results and only relied on the assessment given by NP A. RN C said the facility policy was that all nurses were expected to read the results and then notify the provider of the findings. She said that she was not supposed to send pictures of the results to NP A but she was busy so she just sent pictures of the results without reading them. In an interview on 08/09/23 at 11:04 PM, the PT director said Resident #238 experienced a decline in therapy due to her pain so when she was discussed in the morning meeting on 08/02/23 he requested another xray be performed. He said he talked to NP A who said she would enter in an order for an xray but she did not so he followed up with MD A. He said MD A said she would enter in an order for an xray on 08/02/23, so on the morning of 08/03/23 he logged on to the radiology portal in anticipation of the results and that is when he saw the report dated 07/28/23 that identified Resident #238's left femur fracture. The Therapy Director said he immediately printed out the results and turn it over to the IP and Administrator. In an interview on 08/09/23 at 11:40 AM, the IP said the Therapy Director brought it to her attention on 08/03/23 that Resident #238 had an unidentified femur fracture from an t performed on 07/28/23. Once notified she took it to the nurse responsible who then notified the doctor right away. The IP said she had no lab or radiology review responsibility but instead did what any prudent nurse would do. In an interview on 08/11/23 at 11:09 AM, the Medical Director said the facility has designated nurses/DON to communicate results of a fracture or any negative acute findings verbally to the provider. He said failure to timely identify and notify the provider of an acute fracture could place residents at risk for a decreased quality of life, uncontrolled pain, infection and psychological distress. In an interview on 08/14/23 at , NP A said on 07/28/23 she received a group of texts from RN C with results from Resident #238's x-rays as well as others. She said she briefly looked over it and missed the left femur fracture that was identified on one of the many pictures RN C sent. NP A said following the fall Resident #238 showed symptoms of a fracture and she wanted to perform additional x-rays but the resident refused so she did not enter in another order. She said Resident #238 appeared confused, had swelling in her leg with pain. NP A said Resident #238 was complaining off and on of pain and she was treated with pain medication. She said the Resident #238 did not give the impression that she did not have a fracture but since the resident refused further radiology scans she did not enter new orders for x-rays even though the patient was symptomatic. NP A said RN C probably didn't call her with Resident #238's fracture results and the fracture was missed by all. She said the results she received did not have an alert stamp and the results were on the bottom and not the top of the report so she missed the result. NP A said Resident #238's fracture was not identified until 08/03/23 (6 days after the fall). NP A said unidentified fracture results can happen and the facility its best but failure to identify a fracture could place residents at risk for pain until the fracture is addressed, a further decrease in quality of care. She said the facility policy requires nurses to read the results, then verbally notify the provider of the results, nurses do not text results. Resident #235 Record review of Resident #235's face sheet dated 06/28/23 revealed, a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: acute kidney failure, UTI and unspecified fall. The resident discharged on 07/18/23. Record review of Resident #235's secondary Face Sheet dated 06/28/23 at 10:28 AM revealed, Resident #235 admitted to the facility on [DATE] at 09:01 PM. Record review of Resident #235's Baseline Care Plan dated 06/27/23 revealed, the resident was alert & oriented and experiencing generalized aching pain Record review of Resident #235's admission MDS dated [DATE] revealed, intact cognition as indicated by a BIMS score of 15 out of 15. Record review of Resident #235's admission Nursing Screening dated 06/27/23 and signed by RN E revealed, the resident's cognition was intact and the resident was assessed visually for pain and it was documented as hurts a little bit. Record review of Resident #235's Hospital Discharge Record dated 06/27/23 at 03:45 PM revealed, Resident #235's next scheduled dose of medications as follows: - Famotidine 20 mg (used to treat acid reflux)- 1 Tablet by mouth daily with the next dose due on 06/28/23 at 09:00 AM. - Morphine ( an opioid pain medication) 15 mg ER- 1 Tablet be mouth every six hours with next dose due on 06/27/23 at 09:00 PM. - Oxycodone 10 mg (an opioid pain medication)- 1 Tablet by mouth every 6 hours with next dose due on 06/27/23 at 06:00 PM. - Metronidazole 500 mg (an antibiotic)- 1 tablet by mouth every 8 hours with next dose scheduled on 06/27/23 at 08:00 PM. - Simvastatin 20 mg (used to treat high cholesterol)- 1 tablet by mouth at bed time with next dose scheduled on 06/27/23 at bedtime. - Hydralazine 50 mg ( used to treat high blood pressure)- 1 tablet by mouth 4 times daily with next dose scheduled on 06/27/23 at 09:00 PM. Record review of Resident #235's Order Summary Report dated 06/28/23 revealed, - Famotidine 20 mg- give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for acid reflux ordered on 06/27/23 with a start date of 06/28/23. - Morphine Sulfate 15 mg- give 1 tablet by mouth every 12 hours for pain ordered on 06/27/23 with a start date of 06/28/23. - Oxycodone 10 mg- give 1 tablet by mouth every 6 hours for pain ordered on 06/27/23 with a start date of 06/28/23 - Simvastatin 20 mg- give 1 tablet by mouth at bedtime for hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol) ordered on 06/27/23 with a start date of 06/28/23 - Metronidazole 500 mg- 1 tablet by mouth every 8 hours ordered on 06/27/23 with a start date of 06/28/23 - Hydralazine 50 mg - 1 tablet by mouth four times a day for high blood pressure ordered on 06/27/23 with a start date of 06/28/23 Record review of Resident #235's June MAR printed 06/28/23 at 12:50 PM revealed, her medications were not started until 06/28/23. - Simvastatin 20 mg- 1 tablet by mouth at bedtime for hyperlipidemia due at 08:00 PM on 06/27/23. The start date not scheduled till 06/28/23. - Metronidazole 500 mg- give 1 tablet by mouth every 8 hours for cellulitis( bacterial skin infection) for 7 days due at 06/27/23 at 08:00 PM. Start date entered as 06/28/23 at 12:00 AM. - Metronidazole 500 mg- give 1 tablet by mouth every 8 hours for cellulitis( bacterial skin infection) for 7 days scheduled for 06/28/23 at 12:00 AM. Reason not administered- medication not available. - Hydralazine 50 mg- give 1 tablet by mouth four times a day for high blood pressure due at 06/27/23 at 09:00 PM. Start date entered as 06/28/23 at 08:00 AM. - Oxycodone 10 mg- give 1 tablet by mouth every 6 hours due at 06/28/23 at 12:00 AM. The start date was not entered until 06/28/23 at 06:00 AM. - Oxycodone 10 mg- give 1 tablet by mouth every 6 hours scheduled for 06/28/23 at 06:00 AM. Reason not administered- medication not available. - Morphine Sulfate 15 mg ER- give 1 tablet by mouth every 12 hours for pain due at 06/27/23 at 09:00 PM. The Order was entered incorrectly as Morphine Sulfate 15 mg (IR) with a start date of 06/28/23 at 08:00 AM Record review of Resident #253's Progress Note dated 06/28/23 revealed - 01:16 AM- resident came in after 9 pm, [automated dispensing system] does not have name. - 04:19 AM - complaint of pain to legs - 05:25 AM- no medication on hand - 05:56 AM- Resident #235 was informed that the MD was notified for prescriptions to be sent to the pharmacy. Resident #235 informed the facility that she had her Morphine and Oxycodone at home and she asked if her son brought them to the facility could the facility staff administer it. Record review of Resident #235's June MAR dated 06/28/23 at 12:50 PM revealed the following pain scores: - 05 out of 10 on 06/28/23 at 04:19 PM - 10 out of 10 when Resident was administered her Morphine 15 mg scheduled for 08:00 AM. - 08 out of 10 when Resident was administered her Oxycodone 10 mg scheduled for 12:00 PM. Record review of Resident #235's Physician's Notes from 06/27/23 to 07/18/23 revealed, no documentation of reported ineffective pain management, uncontrolled pain or pain scores that remained the same after medication administration by nursing staff. Record review of Resident #235's Progress Notes dated 07/14/23 at 01:50 PM signed by LVN B revealed, the facility ran out of Resident #235's Oxycodone on 07/14/23 and LVN B was awaiting delivery of the medication from the pharmacy. Record review of Resident #235' June Progress Notes revealed, no documentation of unchanged or increased pain scores which indicate ineffective pain management and no documentation of MD notification of inefficient pain management. No documentation of post medication administration pain assessments to determine if the medication administered was effective. Record review of Resident #235's Oxycodone 10 mg ER June MAR revealed, - increased pain recorded on 06/28/23 between 06:00 AM and 12:00 PM doses from an 3 to an 8 out of 10. - unchanged pain recorded on 06/28/23 between 12:00 PM and 08:00 PM doses at an 8 out of 10. - unchanged pain recorded on 06/29/23 between 12:00 AM and 06:00 AM doses at a 5 out of 10. - increased pain recorded on 06/29/23 between 06:00 AM and 12:00 PM doses from an 5 to a 7 out of 10. increased pain recorded on 06/29/23 between 12:00 AM and 06:00 PM doses from an 7 to an 8 out of 10. - unchanged pain recorded on 06/30/23 between 12:00 AM and 06:00 AM doses at a 5 out of 10. Record review of Resident #235' July Progress Notes revealed, no documentation of unchanged or increased pain scores which indicate ineffective pain management and no documentation of MD notification of inefficient pain management. No documentation of post medication administration pain assessments to determine if the medication administered was effective. Record review of Resident #235's Oxycodone 10 mg ER July MAR revealed, - increased pain from a 0 to a 4 out of 10 on 07/03/23 between 06:00 PM to 07/0/423 at 12:00 AM doses. - increased pain from a 0 to a 5 out of 10 on 07/04/23 between 12:00 Pm to 06:00 PM doses. - increased pain from a 3 to an 8 out of 10 on 07/06/23 between 12:00 PM to 06:00 PM doses. - increased pain from a 2 to an 9 out of 10 on 07/07/23 between 12:00 PM to 06:00 PM doses. - unchanged pain at 5 out of 10 recorded on 07/08/23 between 12:00 AM and 06:00 AM doses. - unchanged pain at 5 out of 10 recorded on 07/09/23 between 12:00 AM and 06:00 AM doses. - increased pain from a 5 to an 6 out of 10 on 07/09/23 between 06:00 AM to 12:00 PM doses. - unchanged pain at 6 out of 10 recorded on 07/09/23 between 12:00 PM and 06:00 PM doses. - increased pain from a 3 to an 8 out of 10 on 07/11/23 between 06:00 AM to 12:00 PM doses. - increased pain from a 2 to an 9 out of 10 on 07/12/23 between 06:00 AM to 12:00 PM doses. Record review of Resident #235's Medication Administration Audit from 06/27/23 to 07/18/23 dated 08/03/23 revealed, the resident received her Oxycodone and Morphine outside of scheduled administration times on 23 different occasions during her stay: 1- Morphine ER 15 mg scheduled for 06/28/23 at 08:00 AM, administered at 09:15 PM; The medication was not available 2- Morphine ER 15 mg scheduled for 06/30/23 at 08:00 PM, administered at 9:33 PM; There was no documented reason for the late administration. 3- Morphine ER 15 mg scheduled for 07/01/23 at 08:00 AM, administered at 09:05 PM; There was no documented reason for the late administration. 4- Oxycodone 10 mg scheduled for 07/02/23 at 06:00 PM, administered at 7:11 PM; There was no documented reason for the late administration. 5- Morphine ER 15 mg scheduled for 07/02/23 at 08:00 PM, administered at 11:32 PM; There was no documented reason for the late administration. 6- Morphine ER 15 mg scheduled for 07/03/23 at 08:00 PM, administered at 09:58 PM: There was no documented reason for the late administration. 7- Oxycodone 10 mg scheduled for 07/04/23 at 06:00 AM, administered at 7:05 AM; There was no documented reason for the late administration. 8- Morphine ER 15 mg scheduled for 07/04/23 at 08:00 AM, administered at 09:15 AM; There was no documented reason for the late administration. 9- Morphine ER 15 mg scheduled for 07/04/23 at 08:00 PM, administered at 10:44 PM: There was no documented reason for the late administration. 10- Morphine ER 15 mg scheduled for 07/06/23 at 08:00 AM, administered at 09:19 AM; There was no documented reason for the late administration. 11- Morphine ER 15 mg scheduled for 07/06/23 at 08:00 PM, administered at 09:20 PM; There was no documented reason for the late administration. 12- Morphine ER 15 mg scheduled for 07/07/23 at 08:00 AM, administered at 11:53AM; There was no documented reason for the late administration. 13- Morphine ER 15 mg scheduled for 07/07/23 at 08:00 PM, administered at 09:03 PM; There was no documented reason for the late administration. 14- Morphine ER 15 mg scheduled for 07/08/23 at 08:00 AM, administered at 11:03AM; There was no documented reason for the late administration. 15- Morphine ER 15 mg scheduled for 07/08/23 at 08:00 PM, administered at 10:07 PM; There was no documented reason for the late administration. 16- Morphine ER 15 mg scheduled for 07/09/23 at 08:00 AM, administered at 09:30AM; There was no documented reason for the late administration. 17- Morphine ER 15 mg scheduled for 07/10/23 at 08:00 PM, administered at 09:05 PM; There was no documented reason for the late administration. 18- Oxycodone 10 mg scheduled on 07/12/23 at 12:00 AM, administered at 3:16 AM; There was no documented reason for the late administration. 19- Oxycodone 10 mg scheduled for 07/14/23 at 12:00 PM, administered at 02:17 PM; The medication ran out of refills. 20- Morphine ER 15 mg scheduled for 07/16/23 at 08:00 AM, administered at 10:05 AM 21- Oxycodone 10 mg scheduled for 07/17/23 at 06:00 PM, administered at 07:30 PM; There was no documented reason for the late administration. 22- Morphine ER 15 mg scheduled for 07/17/23 at 08:00 PM, administered at 09:12 PM; There was no documented reason for the late administration. 23- Morphine ER 15 mg scheduled for 07/18/23 at 08:00 AM, administered at 09:03 AM; There was no documented reason for the late administration. Record review of Resident #235's Progress Notes dated 07/18/23 revealed resident discharged home with home health care. An observation on 06/28/23 at 08:45 AM revealed, Resident #235's family member approaching RN B while she prepared for medication administration to Resident #235. He said that he was very upset with the facility because prior to admission he was assured that Resident #235's medication would be available upon her admission but it was not. He said Resident #235 called him multiple times overnight to inform him that she had not received any of her medication since she arrived at the facility and she was in severe pain. Resident #235's family member then handed RN B 2 bottles of medication (Morphine ER 15 mg and Oxycodone 10 mg) and said he brought only a 2 days' supply to cover Resident #235 until the medication arrived at the facility. After Resident #235's family member entered the resident's room, RN B alerted the Interim DON to the arrival of the media[TRUNCATED]
CRITICAL (K) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Pharmacy Services (Tag F0755)

Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures t...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of 5 of 10 residents (Resident #26, Resident #235, Resident #236, Resident #237 and Resident #270) reviewed for pharmaceutical services. - The facility failed to acquire, dispense, and timely administer medications to Resident #235 including Morphine ER 15 mg and Oxycodone 10 mg, medications used for pain; leaving the resident's pain uncontrolled on a pain scale ranging from 08 to 10 out of 10. - The facility failed to acquire, dispense, and timely administer Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen 75 mg- 325 mg to Resident #237 upon admission leaving the resident's pain uncontrolled on a pain scale up to 07 out of 10. - The facility failed to acquire, dispense, and timely administer medications to Resident #26, Resident #236 and Resident #270. On 08/01/23 04:22 PM an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified. While the IJ was removed on 08/09/23 at 12:53 PM, the facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of actual harm and a scope of pattern due to the facility continuing to monitor the implementation and effectiveness of their plan of removal These failures could place residents receiving medication at risk of inadequate therapeutic outcomes and uncontrolled pain. Findings included: Resident #235 Record review of Resident #235's face sheet dated 06/28/23 revealed, a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: acute kidney failure, UTI and unspecified fall. The resident discharged on 07/18/23. Record review of Resident #235's secondary Face Sheet dated 06/28/23 at 10:28 AM revealed, Resident #235 admitted to the facility on [DATE] at 09:01 PM. Record review of Resident #235's Baseline Care Plan dated 06/27/23 revealed, the resident was alert & oriented generalized aching pain Record review of Resident #235's Hospital Discharge Record dated 06/27/23 at 03:45 PM revealed, Resident #235's next scheduled dose of pain medications as follows: - Morphine 15 mg ER- 1 tablet be mouth every six hours with next dose due on 06/27/23 at 09:00 PM. - Oxycodone 10 mg- 1 Tablet by mouth every 6 hours with next dose due on 06/27/23 at 06:00 PM. - Metronidazole 500 mg- 1 tablet by mouth every 8 hours with next dose scheduled on 06/27/23 at 08:00 PM. - Simvastatin 20 mg- 1 tablet by mouth at bed time with next dose scheduled on 06/27/23 at bedtime. - Hydralazine 50 mg- 1 tablet by mouth 4 times daily with next dose scheduled on 06/27/23 at 09:00 PM. - Budesonide-Formoterol- 2 puffs 2 times a day for 14 days with next dose scheduled on 06/28/23 at 09:00 AM. - Famotidine 20 mg- 1 tablet by mouth daily with next dose scheduled on 06/28/23 at 09:00 AM. - Fiber tablets with next dose scheduled as directed. Record review of Resident #235's Order Summary Report dated 06/28/23 revealed, - Acetaminophen 650- 1 tablet by mouth every 8 hours as needed for pain starting 06/27/23 at 10:45 PM. - Morphine Sulfate 15 mg- give 1 tablet by mouth every 12 hours for pain ordered on 06/27/23 with a start date of 06/28/23. - Oxycodone 10 mg- give 1 tablet by mouth every 6 hours for pain ordered on 06/27/23 with a start date of 06/28/23 - Simvastatin 20 mg- give 1 tablet by mouth at bedtime for hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol) ordered on 06/27/23 with a start date of 06/28/23 - Metronidazole 500 mg- 1 tablet by mouth every 8 hours ordered on 06/27/23 with a start date of 06/28/23 - Hydralazine 50 mg - 1 tablet by mouth four times a day for high blood pressure ordered on 06/27/23 with a start date of 06/28/23 - Budesonide-Formoterol inhalation solution- 2 puffs by mouth two times a day for 14 days for SOB; ordered on 06/27/23 with a start date of 06/28/23. - Famotidine 20 mg- give 1 tablet by mouth for acid reflux ordered on 06/27/23 with a start date of 06/28/23. - Fiber one- give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for supplement ordered on 06/27/23 with a start date of 06/28/23. - Nystatin External Powder- apply to groin topically two times a day for rash for 10 days ordered on 06/27/23 with a start date of 06/28/23. Record review of Resident #235's Progress Note dated 06/28/23 revealed - 01:16 AM- resident came in after 9 pm, automated dispensing system does not have name. - 04:19 AM - complaint of pain to legs - 05:25 AM- no medication on hand - 05:56 AM- Resident #235 was informed that the MD was notified for prescriptions to be sent to the pharmacy. Resident #235 informed the facility that she had her Morphine and Oxycodone at home and she asked if her son brought them to the facility could the facility staff administer it. Record review of Resident #235's June MAR printed 06/28/23 at 12:50 PM revealed, her medications were not started until 06/28/23 and the following medications were not administered: - Famotidine 20 mg- give 1 tablet by mouth for acid reflux scheduled for 06/28/23 at 08:00 AM. The MAR was left blank, no reason for non-administration documented. The medication was located in the E-Kit but it was not pulled. - Fiber one- give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for supplement scheduled for 06/28/23 at 08:00 AM. Reason not administered- medication not available. - Simvastatin 20 mg- 1 tablet by mouth at bedtime for hyperlipidemia due at 08:00 PM on 06/27/23. The start date not scheduled till 06/28/23. - Budesonide-Formoterol inhalation solution- 2 puffs by mouth two times a day for 14 days for SOB scheduled for 06/28/23 at 08:00 AM. Reason not administered- medication not available. - Nystatin External Powder- apply to groin topically two times a day for rash for 10 days scheduled for 06/28/23 at 08:00 AM. Reason not administered- medication not available. - Metronidazole 500 mg- give 1 tablet by mouth every 8 hours for cellulitis( bacterial skin infection) for 7 days due at 06/27/23 at 08:00 PM. Start date entered as 06/28/23 at 12:00 AM. The medication was located in the E-Kit but it was not pulled. - Metronidazole 500 mg- give 1 tablet by mouth every 8 hours for cellulitis( bacterial skin infection) for 7 days scheduled for 06/28/23 at 12:00 AM. Reason not administered- medication not available. The medication was located in the E-Kit but it was not pulled. - Hydralazine 50 mg- give 1 tablet by mouth four times a day for high blood pressure due at 06/27/23 at 09:00 PM. Start date entered as 06/28/23 at 08:00 AM. The medication was located in the E-Kit but it was not pulled. - Hydralazine 50 mg- give 1 tablet by mouth four times a day for high blood pressure scheduled for 06/28/23 at 08:00 AM. Reason not administered- medication not available. The medication was located in the E-Kit but it was not pulled. - Oxycodone 10 mg- give 1 tablet by mouth every 6 hours due at 06/28/23 at 12:00 AM. The start date was not entered until 06/28/23 at 06:00 AM. - Oxycodone 10 mg- give 1 tablet by mouth every 6 hours scheduled for 06/28/23 at 06:00 AM. Reason not administered- medication not available. - Morphine Sulfate 15 mg ER- give 1 tablet by mouth every 12 hours for pain due at 06/27/23 at 09:00 PM. The Order was entered incorrectly as Morphine Sulfate 15 mg (IR) with a start date of 06/28/23 at 08:00 AM Record review of Resident #235's June MAR dated 06/28/23 at 12:50 PM revealed the following pain scores: - 05 out of 10 when Resident was administered her only dose of Acetaminophen 650 mg on 06/28/23 at 04:19 AM - 10 out of 10 when Resident was administered her Morphine 15 mg scheduled for 08:00 AM. - 08 out of 10 when Resident was administered her Oxycodone 10 mg scheduled for 12:00 PM. Record review of Resident #235's Pharmacy Records dated 06/28/23 revealed, MD A did not submit electronic prescriptions for Resident #235's Oxycodone 10 mg and Morphine ER 15 mg until 06/28/23 at 05:31 PM, over 20 hours after the resident's admission. Record review of the facility E-kit Inventory revealed dated 06/28/23 at 03:09 PM revealed, - the kit contained Metronidazole 500 mg - the kit contained Hydralazine 25 mg - the kit contained Famotidine 20 mg Record review of Resident #235's Progress Notes dated 07/14/23 at 01:50 PM signed by LVN B revealed, the facility ran out of Resident #235's Oxycodone on 07/14/23 and LVN B was awaiting delivery of the medication from the pharmacy. Record review of Resident #235's Medication Administration Audit from 06/27/23 to 07/18/23 dated 08/03/23 revealed, the resident received her Oxycodone and Morphine outside of scheduled administration times on 23 different occasions during her stay: 1- Morphine ER 15 mg scheduled for 06/28/23 at 08:00 AM, administered at 09:15 PM. There was no documented reasons for late administration. 2- Morphine ER 15 mg scheduled for 06/30/23 at 08:00 PM, administered at 9:33 PM. There was no documented reasons for late administration. 3- Morphine ER 15 mg scheduled for 07/01/23 at 08:00 AM, administered at 09:05 PM; There was no documented reasons for late administration. 4- Oxycodone 10 mg scheduled for 07/02/23 at 06:00 PM, administered at 7:11 PM; There was no documented reasons for late administration. 5- Morphine ER 15 mg scheduled for 07/02/23 at 08:00 PM, administered at 11:32 PM; There was no documented reasons for late administration. 6- Morphine ER 15 mg scheduled for 07/03/23 at 08:00 PM, administered at 09:58 PM; There was no documented reasons for late administration. 7- Oxycodone 10 mg scheduled for 07/04/23 at 06:00 AM, administered at 7:05 AM; There was no documented reasons for late administration. 8- Morphine ER 15 mg scheduled for 07/04/23 at 08:00 AM, administered at 09:15 AM; There was no documented reasons for late administration. 9- Morphine ER 15 mg scheduled for 07/04/23 at 08:00 PM, administered at 10:44 PM; There was no documented reasons for late administration. 10- Morphine ER 15 mg scheduled for 07/06/23 at 08:00 AM, administered at 09:19 AM; There was no documented reasons for late administration. 11- Morphine ER 15 mg scheduled for 07/06/23 at 08:00 PM, administered at 09:20 PM; There was no documented reasons for late administration. 12- Morphine ER 15 mg scheduled for 07/07/23 at 08:00 AM, administered at 11:53AM; There was no documented reasons for late administration. 13- Morphine ER 15 mg scheduled for 07/07/23 at 08:00 PM, administered at 09:03 PM; There was no documented reasons for late administration. 14- Morphine ER 15 mg scheduled for 07/08/23 at 08:00 AM, administered at 11:03AM; There was no documented reasons for late administration. 15- Morphine ER 15 mg scheduled for 07/08/23 at 08:00 PM, administered at 10:07 PM; There was no documented reasons for late administration. 16- Morphine ER 15 mg scheduled for 07/09/23 at 08:00 AM, administered at 09:30AM; There was no documented reasons for late administration. 17- Morphine ER 15 mg scheduled for 07/10/23 at 08:00 PM, administered at 09:05 PM; There was no documented reasons for late administration. 18- Oxycodone 10 mg scheduled on 07/12/23 at 12:00 AM, administered at 3:16 AM; There was no documented reasons for late administration. 19- Oxycodone 10 mg scheduled for 07/14/23 at 12:00 PM, administered at 02:17 PM; There was no documented reasons for late administration. 20- Morphine ER 15 mg scheduled for 07/16/23 at 08:00 AM, administered at 10:05 AM; There was no documented reasons for late administration. 21- Oxycodone 10 mg scheduled for 07/17/23 at 06:00 PM, administered at 07:30 PM; There was no documented reasons for late administration. 22- Morphine ER 15 mg scheduled for 07/17/23 at 08:00 PM, administered at 09:12 PM; There was no documented reasons for late administration. 23- Morphine ER 15 mg scheduled for 07/18/23 at 08:00 AM, administered at 09:03 AM; There was no documented reasons for late administration. An observation on 06/28/23 at 08:45 AM revealed, Resident #235's family member approaching RN B while she prepared for medication administration to Resident #235. He said that he was very upset with the facility because prior to admission he was assured that Resident #235's medication would be available upon her admission but it was not. He said Resident #235 called him multiple times overnight to inform him that she had not received any of her medication since she arrived at the facility and she was in severe pain. Resident #235's family member then handed RN B 2 bottles of medication (Morphine ER 15 mg and Oxycodone 10 mg) and said he brought only a 2 days' supply to cover Resident #235 until the medication arrived at the facility. After Resident #235's family member entered the resident's room, RN B alerted the Interim DON to the arrival of the mediation at which point they both counted the medications and logged them into individual control sheets. In an interview on 06/28/23 at 10:10 AM, RN B said Resident #235 admitted to the facility on the night shift of 06/27/23. She said the patient's medications had not yet arrived from the pharmacy and the night shift nurse said Resident #235's family member would be bringing her pain medication so she was waiting for its arrival. When asked if RN B could have pulled the rest of Resident #235's unavailable medication from the facility EKit (floor stock of prescription medications available for emergency use), she said she administered the OTC medications as well as the pain medication brought in by the family member but she would have to check the facility EKit for the rest of Resident #235's medications. RN B said she immediately administered Morphine ER 15 mg to Resident #235 once it was delivered by the resident's family member but the Oxycodone was not due yet. She could not say when Resident #235 received her last dose of Oxycodone. RN B said failure to administer medications as ordered could place residents at risk for uncontrolled disease states such as uncontrolled pain. In an interview on 06/28/23 at 10:35 AM, the Interim DON said when a resident arrived at the facility the admitting nurse is expected to review the hospital paperwork to verify the last dose of medications received as well as when the next dose is due. She said the nurse then enters the order into the system and verifies it with the physician. The Interim DON said Resident #235 admitted to the facility on [DATE] at around 08:30 PM so her medications were not yet delivered by the pharmacy. She said that the expectation was for residents to receive their medications as ordered and that the nurse should have taken into consideration Resident #235's last doses to determine when the next dose was due and to at least get an order for a one-time dose to ensure that the resident received her medications. The interim DON said if a CII medication ( scheduled 2 controlled substances that require additional care because of the potential to intentionally or unintentionally abuse the drug) was unavailable nursing staff are expected to request an appropriate alternative treat the patients pain and most other medications could be found in the e-kit until the medication arrived. The Interim DON said that failure to administer medication to residents as ordered could place residents at risk for uncontrolled disease states and pain. In an interview on 06/28/23 at 11:11 AM, Resident #235 said she discharged from the hospital on [DATE] at 04:00 PM but she did not get picked up by the transport company until after 08:00 PM so by the time she arrived at the facility her medications were already due. She said when she arrived at the facility she explained to the staff that since she was discharged from the hospital at 4:00 PM the hospital was unable to administer any of her medications due after 4:00 PM. Resident #235 said she asked for her medications especially her pain medication but she was told the medication was not available at the facility. She said she specifically asked for her pain medications Morphine and Oxycodone because her pain was a 10 out of 10 but it was unavailable so her son had to bring in her pain medication in the morning (06/28/23). Resident #235 said she was in severe pain rendering her unable to do anything and writhing in pain prior to receiving her Morphine morning. She said after receiving her Morphine her pain was at 08 out of 10 but she had still not received her Oxycodone. In an interview on 08/02/23 at 01:56 PM, LVN B said Resident #235 was generally pleasant and she had been taking Oxycodone for a long time., LVN B said nursing staff are expected to reorder medications at least 6 days before the medication runs out but 07/14/23 the resident did not have Oxycodone 10 mg available for administration for her 12:00 PM dose. She said she contacted the pharmacy to check on the delivery of the medication and she was informed the medication was on route. She said medications must be administered within 1 hour of the scheduled time and pain should be assessed 1 hour following oral pain medication administration. LVN B said failure to administer medication on time could place residents at risk for uncontrolled health conditions. In an interview on 08/13/23 at 08:03 AM, RN E said she was the admitting nurse for Resident #235 on 06/28/23. She said when the resident admitted to the facility she entered reconciled the medications with the provider, including the Resident #235's pain medications Oxycodone and Morphine. She said when she notified the provider, the provider stated that late admissions always resulted in problems with CII medication acquisition because they were unable to electronically prescribe the medications. She said she asked for an alternative and the provider gave an order for Tylenol and nothing else. RN E said Acetaminophen was not sufficient pain control for patients on opioid medications but that was the medication ordered for the resident upon admission. RN E said she thought the provider would send the prescription for Oxycodone and Morphine Immediately so she was not concerned of the need for alternative pain coverage. Resident #237 Record review of Resident #237's Nurse report dated 07/26/23 revealed, Resident #237 arrived at the facility at 7 pm. Record review of Resident #237's Face Sheet dated 08/11/23 revealed, a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility with diagnoses of: atrial fibrillation (irregular heartbeat), acute kidney failure, opioid dependence, anemia, hypertension (high blood pressure) and type 2 diabetes. The resident discharged from the facility on 08/05/23. Record review of Resident #237's admission MDS dated [DATE] revealed, intact cognition as indicated by a BIMS score of 15 out of 15, supervision with most ADLs, occasionally incontinent of bladder and always continent of bowel. Yes- resident received scheduled and PRN pain medication in the last 5 days as well as received non-medication intervention for pain. Resident #237 reported frequent pain and the worst pain reported was a 5 out of 10. Record review of Resident #237's Baseline Care Plan dated 07/26/23 and signed by RN F revealed, admission goals to return to the family home, one person assist with most ADLs, wheelchair use, always continent of both bladder and bowel. Physician orders for opioids was not selected, presence of pain was documented as no. Record review of Resident #237's Hospital Discharge Instructions dated 07/26/23 revealed, the resident discharged with orders for Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen (Norco) 5mg/325mg take 1 tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed for pain score 1-3. Record review of Resident #237's Physician's Order dated 07/26/23 revealed, Acetaminophen 325 mg- 2 tables by mouth every 6 hours as needed. The order was had a start date of 07/26/23 at 08:15 PM and a stop date of 07/27/23 at 12:37 PM. Record review of Resident #237's Physician's Order dated 07/27/23 revealed, Norco (Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen) 7.5 mg/325 mg- give 1 tabled by mouth three times a day. The start date of the order was 07/27/23. Record review of Resident #237's Progress Notes dated 07/27/23 at 11:06 PM signed by RN F revealed, RN F reconciled/reviewed the resident's hospital medications with MD C who ordered to continue all hospital discharge orders. MD C gave new orders for Acetaminophen 325 mg (2 tabs) every 6 hours for pain. Record review of Resident #237's July MAR revealed, Resident #237 never received Norco on 07/26/23 and her first dose was administered on 07/27/23 for a dose scheduled at 4:00 PM (approximately 21 hours after admitting to the facility). At the administration of the first dose Resident #237 reported pain at 07 out of 10. Record review of Resident #237's Pharmacy Records dated 07/27/23 revealed, MD B did not send in Resident #235's prescription for Norco 7.5/325 mg on 07/26/23. The prescription was not electronic prescribed to the pharmacy until 07/27/23 at 03:30 PM, over 20 hours after the resident arrived at the facility. Record review of Resident #237's Medication Administration Audit from 07/26/23 to 08/05/23 revealed, Resident #237 received her Norco outside of scheduled administration times on 4 different occasions during her stay: 1. 07/27/23 scheduled for 04:00 PM but administered at 05:25 PM. 2. 07/27/23 scheduled for 08:00 PM but administered at 10:21 PM 3. 07/29/23 scheduled for 04:00 PM but administered at 05:06 PM. 4. 07/30/23 scheduled for 08:00 PM but administered at 09:24 PM In an interview on 08/02/23 at 2:55 PM, the Administrator said that after pain medication administration nursing staff are expected to do a post administration assessment of the residents pain 30 minutes following medication administration to determine its efficacy. She said if the pain is the same the doctor must be notified and the communication and assessment must be documented in the progress notes. In an interview on 08/02/23 at 03:10 PM, Resident #237 said there were some discrepancies in her medication when she admitted to the facility. She said she admitted into the facility in the evening and the facility didn't have her medications. Resident #237 said she was told that her pain medication was sent to a local pharmacy but by the time her brother tried to pick it up the pharmacy had closed at 7 PM. She said she could not verbalize her pain on a scale but at around 08:30 PM her pain was so severe that she could not focus and it impaired her activities. Resident #237 said her brother picked up her pain medications and brought it to the facility the next morning (07/27/23) but she felt that the facility should have provided her the medication and it was inappropriate for residents to bring their own medication for administration in the facility. In an interview on 08/03/23 at 01:45 PM, the Interim DON said medications are to be administered as ordered +/- 1 hour of the scheduled time and residents are to be assessed for pain 1 hr. after administration of medication. She said if a residents pain remains the same or increases the MD must be notified that pain control is ineffective and the nursing staff must continue to monitor the resident. She said failure to administer medications as ordered or assess the effectiveness of the medications is places residents at risk for uncontrolled pain. The Interim DON said upon admissions the facility has to be ready for the Resident including CII medications. She said if a facility does not have a patients CII pain medication the nurse must call the provider to get an alternative such as tramadol and Tylenol #3 since the medication was located in the medication e-kit. The interim DON said acetaminophen was not a temporary alternative for pain control in patient with a history of opioid use. In an interview on 08/03/23 at 02:22 PM, MD B said there are issues whenever a resident admits into the facility over the weekend or evening because the providers are not able to send an electronic prescription as required to the pharmacy for CII medications. She said CII orders have to be sent through an electronic prescribing system to the pharmacy which might cause some delays. MD B said she to her knowledge there were no hold orders on any of Resident #237's medications including the hydrocodone. She said she has evaluated Resident #237 and determined that a scheduled dose every 6 hours instead of PRN pain medication regimen was more appropriate to control the residents pain. MD B said she expects pain medications to be administered on time as ordered and nurses to reassess patients following the administration of pain medications and if the medication was ineffective nurses must notify the provider. She said she was never notified of ineffective pain management for Resident #237. In an interview on 08/04/23 at 1:10 PM, RN F said she was Resident #237's admission nurse and Resident #237 arrived she called the MD C to verify the resident's medication and to request her Norco prescription. She said she was expecting the resident's Hydrocodone to arrive the same day so she did not request an alternative. RN F said she saw that Resident #237's medications, including the Norco, was called into a local pharmacy so she informed the resident and Resident #237's brother was supposed to pick up the medication. She said the facility is expected to fill all medications for residents during their stay but sometimes it is faster to use the resident's supply while waiting for the facility to fill the prescription. RN F said she did not notify the MD that Resident #237's Hydrocodone did not come in, she did not ask for an alternative, did not ask for a stat order and does not remember if she notified the provider of Resident #237's uncontrolled pain. She said failure to administer medications to residents as ordered could place resident's at risk for uncontrolled pain or untreated health conditions. Resident #236 Record review of Resident #236's admission Nurse Report dated 07/28/23 revealed the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] at approximately 04:00 PM. Record review of Resident #236's Face Sheet dated 08/11/23 revealed, an [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: unspecified fracture of right femur, UTI, hypertension, chronic kidney disease and BPH. The resident discharged home on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #236's admission MDS dated [DATE] revealed, intact cognition as indicated by a BIMS score of 15 out of 15, extensive assistance with most ADLs and frequently incontinent of both bladder and bowel. Record review of Hospital Discharge Records dated 07/28/23 at 03:14 PM revealed, Resident #236 received his last dose of Amlodipine 10 mg (used to treat high blood pressure) ordered daily, Azathioprine 50 mg (used to prevent transplant rejection) ordered daily and Finasteride 5 mg (used to treat BPH) ordered daily on 07/27/23 between 09:21 and 09:22 PM. The next dose of these medications were due on the evening of 07/28/23. Record review of Resident #236's Order Summary Report dated 08/11/23 revealed, - Amlodipine and Azathioprine were not started/administered until 07/29/23 at 08:00 AM - Finasteride was incorrectly entered by RN F for morning administration instead of evening administration starting 07/29/23. The order was corrected on 07/31/23 for night time administration. Record review of Resident #236's admission Progress Note dated 07/28/23 at 9:30 PM signed by RN F revealed, the MD gave orders for all the residents discharge meds to be continued and for labs to be performed in the morning. There was no documented reason to skip Resident #236's evening Azathioprine and Amlodipine or delay the start of the residents Finasteride until 07/31/23. Record review of Resident #236's July MAR revealed, - Finasteride 5 mg was not administered on 07/28/23. - Amlodipine 10 mg was not administered on 07/28/23. - Azathioprine 50 mg was not administered on 07/28/23. - Amlodipine 10 mg was first administered on 07/29/23 at 08:00 AM. - Azathioprine 50 mg was first administered on 07/29/23 at 08:00 AM. - Finasteride 5 mg was administered in the morning on 07/29/23 and 07/30/23. - Finasteride 5 mg was first administered in the evening at 08:00 PM on 07/31/23. In an interview on 08/01/23 at 12:43 PM, NP A said she was Resident #236's NP. She said upon admission nursing staff were expected to review the hospital discharge orders to determine when the resident is due for their next dose. NP A said she was not aware that Resident #236's medications were started the morning after his arrival in the facility and she didn't know the resident did not receive his finasteride for several days. An observation and interview on 08/02/23 at 11:26 PM revealed, Resident #236 lying in bed well dressed in no immediate distress. He said he had no issues receiving his medications. Resident #236 was unable to answer any other surveyor questions due to hearing difficulty. In an interview on 08/04/23 at 12:10 PM, RN F said she was the admitting nurse for Resident #236 and when the resident admitted some of his medications were not available. She said when nurses reconciled admissions medications they determine the start date and time of the medications based on the hospital discharge information. RN F said she did not tell the admitting NP the times Resident #236 received his last dose of medications and when his next doses were due. She said she entered Resident #236's medications to start in the morning and the NP B did not give any instructions to hold or delay the start of the resident's medications. Resident #26 Record review of Resident #26's face sheet dated 08/01/23 revealed, a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: cellulitis (bacterial skin infection), depression, malignant neoplasm (cancerous tumor), hypocalcemia (low calcium), acidosis (, disorders of electrolyte, other disorders of electrolyte and fluid balance not elsewhere, essential ( primary) Hypertension, (coronary artery disease ( plaque buildup in the wall of the arteries that supply blood to the heart), Chronic Obstructive pulmonary disease, acute respiratory failure, acute kidney failure, colon cancer and intercostal pain (pain along the ribs, chest or abdomen). Record review of Resident #26's secondary Face Sheet dated 08/01/23 at 10:28 AM revealed, Resident #26 was re admitted to the facility on [DATE] at 06:00 PM. Record review of Resident #26 admission MDS dated [DATE], revealed his BIMS score was 15 out of 15, indicating that Resident #26 was not cognitively impaired. Record review of Resident #26's Hospital Discharge Record dated 07/24/23 at 06:00 PM revealed he transferred to the facility. Record review of Resident #26's July MAR printed 07/28/23 at 5:50 PM revealed, his medications were not started until 07/24/23 and the following medications were not administered 07/25/23 - Atorvastatin Calcium 10mg ( used to treat high cholesterol) - 1 tablet be mouth at bedtime with next dose due on 07/24/23 at 08:00 PM. - Gabapentin 300 mg (used to treat nerve pain)- give 1 tablet by mouth every 12 hours for pain with next dose on 07/24/23 at 08:00 PM.
CRITICAL (K) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Deficiency F0777 (Tag F0777)

Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to promptly notify the ordering physician, results that fall outside of...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to promptly notify the ordering physician, results that fall outside of clinical reference ranges in accordance with facility policies and procedures for notification of a practitioner for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #238) reviewed for diagnostic services in that. - RN C failed to read Resident #238's x-ray results and failed to notify the provider of the resident's femur fracture using the facility's approved notification methods leaving Resident #238 in an undiagnosed/untreated fracture and in pain for 6 days (07/28/23 to 08/03/23). On 08/07/23 at 05:02 PM an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified. While the IJ was removed on 08/15/23 at 03:48 PM, the facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of actual harm and a scope of pattern due to the facility continuing to monitor the implementation and effectiveness of their plan of removal This failure could place residents who required radiology services at risk for delayed identification and treatment of undiagnosed illnesses, hospitalization, pain, suffering and death. Findings included: Record review of Resident #238's Face Sheet date 08/11/23 revealed, a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included; type 2 diabetes, UTI, unspecified fall and back fracture. The resident transferred to an acute care facility on 08/03/23. Record review of Resident #238's Baseline Care Plan dated 07/21/23 revealed, the resident planned to return to her own home following rehabilitation, one person physical assist with most ADLs, always continent of both bladder and bowel, and a history of falls. Record review of Resident #238's admission MDS dated [DATE] revealed, intact cognition as indicated by a BIMS score of 15 out of 15. Record review of Resident #238's Accident/Incident Report dated 07/28/23 revealed, the resident was found on the floor screaming in pain. Resident #238 could not remember how she got to the floor. Record review of Resident #238's Progress Notes dated 07/28/23 at 05:38 AM signed by LVN A revealed, Resident #238 was found lying on the floor near her walker and the vacant bed. Resident was screaming in pain and was assisted into a chair by staff members and the resident complained of left leg and hip pain. NP A w and as notified and she gave orders for a STAT xray and administration of Acetaminophen. Record review of Resident #238's Progress Notes dated 07/28/23 at 3:09 PM signed by RN C revealed, Resident #238 complained of pain to right thigh/leg and then complained about severe pain to left thigh and leg. The resident was seen by the NP and new orders were given for Tramadol (pain medication) and labs. The xray tech reported Resident #238 was not corporative during the first xray so the patient had to be taken to the xray department. Record review of Resident #238's Xray Final Report printed on 07/28/23 at 05:33 PM revealed, Xray left femur- left femur intertrochanteric (where the leg bone meets the hip bone) fracture. Record review of text conversation between RN C and NP A dated 07/28/23 revealed, RN C sent pictures to NP A of Resident #238's xray report that indicated a left femur fracture at 06:24 AM. At 07/28/23 a 06:38 PM NP A responded back with looks normal. Record review of Resident #238's Physician's Order written 07/28/23 revealed, X-ray Right Femur and Right Leg for post fall pain one time only until 07/28/23 at 23:59 PM. There was no order entered for the left leg/hip and there was only 1 order entered on 07/28/23. Record review of Resident #238's Progress Notes from 07/28/23 to 08/02/23 revealed, no documentation of the resident's xray finding of left femur fracture and no documented notification to the physician of the pending xray results. Record review of Resident #238's OT Daily note dated 07/31/23 revealed, Resident #238 refused to get out of the room to do therapy in the gym. The resident reported pain to her left leg 9/10 on the pain scale. Resident #238 refused to do any standing exercises or activities and was highly sensitive with lower extremity movement. There was no documentation of the resident having a fracture. Record review of Resident #238's OT Daily note dated 08/01/23 revealed, Resident #238 continued to report pain to her left leg at 9/10 on the pain scale. Any slight movement intensifies pain. Increased lower extremity swelling and pain to the left leg restricts movement. There was no documentation of the resident having a fracture. Record review of Resident #238's OT Daily note dated 08/02/23 revealed, Resident #238 refused to do any standing or lower extremities exercises/movement. The resident was agreeable to perform upper extremity exercises. Resident #238 refused to do toilet training and upper body/lower-body ADLs due to her pain being unbearable. The resident said it's worse than having a baby. There was no documentation of the resident having a fracture. Record review of Resident #238's PT Daily note dated 08/02/23 revealed, patient unable to move lower left extremity due to increase pain. Patient unable to stand due to increase pain in left hip and knee. Resident #238 stated 9/10 pain on left hip, knee, and below knee nursing notified about the pain. There was no documentation of the resident having a fracture. Record review of Resident #238's Physician Notes dated 08/02/23 revealed, Resident #238 had edema (swelling) to left lower leg and reported pain when examined. Ongoing edema with the pain, concerned about bone/soft tissue involvement, requested a stat x-ray but resident declined. Resident continues to report pain to the left leg but phone call, previous x-ray was negative. The note was signed by NP A on 08/08/23 at 12:00 AM. Record review of Resident #238's Physician Notes dated 08/03/23 revealed, X-ray reviewed showed left hip fracture, Resident #238 continues to have pain and had difficulty putting weight on the left leg. The resident was on tramadol and ibuprofen on an alternating schedule with no benefits. The note was signed by MD A on 08/06/23 at 3:07 PM. In an interview on 08/07/23 at 12:36 PM, MD A said Identification of Resident #238's femur fracture from 07/28/23 was missed from top to bottom. She said once the fracture was identified on 08/03/23 the resident was sent out to the hospital immediately because the facility cannot manage a hip fracture without first receiving an orthopedic consult. MD A said NP A was responsible for receiving the xray results from 07/28/23 and was managing the patient with Tramadol and Ibuprofen scheduled every 6 hours. In an interview on 08/07/23 at 12:50 PM, NP A said Resident #238. NP A said on Friday 07/28/23 she received a call saying Resident #238's x rays were negative for fracture and she did not receive a second call notifying her of the fracture. She said during her clinical assessment the resident presented with a swollen leg which was suspicious for a fracture and was also experiencing a decline in function and increased pain. NP A said when a provider places an order for an Xray, nursing staff are expected to enter the orders and once the test are completed notification must be provided to the NP/MD by phone notification. In an interview on 08/07/23 at 02:06 PM, the Therapy Manager said upon admission Resident #238 was not bad but she sustained a fall on 07/28/23 which led to a drastic change in function. He said Resident #238 went from just requiring supervision with ADLs/ambulation at admission to requiring 2 people maximum assistance following the fall, and the resident reported pain on a scale from 06-9 with movement. In an interview on 08/07/23 at 5:34 PM, the DON said after Resident #238's fall on 07/28/23 the resident received 2 xray results but there was no order entered for the 2nd xray so she couldn't track it. She said all xray results should be reviewed by the nurse and the physician should be notified via a phone call of the findings. The DON said failure to identify xray results timely could result in a delay in treatment, the resident developing a clot from the fracture and uncontrolled pain. In an interview on 08/08/23 at 06:58 AM, LVN A said on 07/28/23 she walked into the room and found Resident #238 on the floor by the unoccupied resident's bed. She said Resident #238 didn't know what happened. She said she was unable to assess Resident #238's left leg ROM because the resident would not allow her to touch it. LVN A said Resident #238 said it hurt and told the staff not to move her. She said Resident #238 said the pain was really bad in her hip and when the staff tried to get her to lie down she refused. She said she notified the provider who ordered multiple stat xrays. In an interview on 08/09/23 at 09:16 AM, RN C said that during the week of 07/28/23 Resident #238 complained of pain in her thighs and legs. She said earlier in the morning of 07/28/23 an x-ray tech came to the resident's room to perform an x-ray of Resident #238's hips but the resident wasn't cooperative so a CNA had to assist the x-ray tech. RN C said since the resident was non-complaint during the previous x-ray the resident had to be taken to the hospital on the evening of 07/28/23. She said when the results came back, she took pictures of the x-ray results and sent it to NP A who reviewed the results and said everything was ok. RN C said she never read the x-ray results and only relied on the assessment given by NP A. RN C said the facility policy was that all nurses were expected to read the results and then notify the provider of the findings. She said she was not supposed to send pictures of the results to NP A but she was busy so she just sent pictures of the results without reading them. In an interview on 08/09/23 at 11:04 PM, the PT Director said Resident #238 experienced a decline in therapy due to her pain so when she was discussed in the morning meeting on 08/02/23 he requested another x-ray be performed. He said he talked to NP A who said she would enter in an order for an x-ray but she did not so he followed up with MD A. He said MD A said she would enter in an order for an x-ray on 08/02/23, so on the morning of 08/03/23 he logged on to the radiology portal in anticipation of the results and that was when he saw the report dated 07/28/23 that identified Resident #238's left femur fracture. The Therapy Director said he immediately printed out the results and turn it over to the IP and Administrator. In an interview on 08/09/23 at 11:40 AM, the IP said the Therapy Director brought it to her attention on 08/03/23 that Resident #238 had an unidentified femur fracture from an xray performed on 07/28/23. Once notified she took it to the nurse responsible (RN C) who then notified the doctor right away. The IP said she had no lab or radiology review responsibility but instead did what any prudent nurse would do. In an interview on 08/11/23 at 11:09 AM, the Medical Director said the facility has designated nurses/DON to communicate results of a fracture or any negative acute findings verbally to the provider. He said failure to timely identify and notify the provider of an acute fracture could place residents at risk for a decreased quality of life, uncontrolled pain, infection and psychological distress. In an interview on 08/14/23 at 09:03 AM , NP A said on 07/28/23 she received a group of texts from RN C with results from Resident #238's x-rays as well as others. She said she briefly looked over it and missed the left femur fracture that was identified on one of the many pictures RN C sent. NP A said following the fall Resident #238 showed symptoms of a fracture and she wanted to perform additional x-rays but the resident refused so she did not enter in another order. She said Resident #238 appeared confused, had swelling in her leg with pain. NP A said Resident #238 was complaining off and on of pain and she was treated with pain medication. She said Resident #238 did not give the impression that she did not have a fracture but since the resident refused further radiology scans she did not enter new orders for x-rays even though the resident was symptomatic. NP A said RN C probably didn't call her with Resident #238's fracture results and the fracture was missed by all. She said the results she received did not have an alert stamp and the results were on the bottom and not the top of the report, so she missed the result. NP A said Resident #238's fracture was not identified until 08/03/23 (6 days after the fall). NP A said unidentified fracture results can happen and the facility staff are trying their best. She said failure to identify a fracture could place residents at risk for pain until the fracture is addressed, a further decrease in quality of care. She said the facility policy requires nurses to read the results, then verbally notify the provider of the results, nurses do not text results. Record review of the facility policy titled Test Results revised on 04/2007 revealed, 1- results of laboratory, radiological and diagnostic tests shall be reported in writing to the resident's attending physician or to the facility. 2- should the tests be provided to the facility, the attending physician shall be promptly notified of the results. 3- the DON or the charge nurse receiving the test results, shall be responsible for notifying the physician of such test results. This was determined to be an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 08/07/23 at 05:02 PM. The Administrator and was notified and provided the IJ template on 08/07/23 at 05:44 PM; a Plan of Removal (POR) was requested at that time The following plan of removal was approved on 08/10/23 at 02:22 PM and the immediacy was removed on 08/12/23 at 03:48 PM F-777 Radiology/Diagnostic Services Ordered/Notify Result [Facility name] has implemented the following Plan confirming systems are in place to ensure that radiology/diagnostic tests for residents are appropriately ordered, the results of the tests obtained and placed in the residents' medical records, and that the ordering physician is aware of the test results and took appropriate action. Immediate Action: Document here the action taken by the facility to ensure there are no residents in jeopardy or threat of harm. This could include assessing residents, reviewing records, assessing environmental concerns, provide training to immediate staff. Date each task and if needed when task will be completed and who is responsible for completing the task (if a contractor or supplies need coordinated what day the service of goods available to the facility). 1. The facility undertook corrective action with regards to Resident #238 to confirm that all radiology/diagnostic tests were appropriately ordered, the results obtained and placed in her medical records, and the ordering physician made aware of the results. Resident #238 was discharged from the facility on August 3, 2023. 2. The Interim Director of Nursing/Designee will audit all residents (as of August 1, 2023) to confirm that all ordered radiology/diagnostic tests were performed, results placed in the paper and electronic medical records, the physician notified of the results, and the physician reviewed the tests and took appropriate action, as necessary. See the details of the plan for continued auditing/monitoring outlined on page 5. 3. The facility identified that it had a process in place for ordering, obtaining the results, reviewing the results, and notification of the physician for radiology/diagnostic tests. The process includes: o Confirming that there is a physician order for the diagnostic/radiology test; o Confirming that the diagnostic/radiology test is completed as ordered by the physician; o Accessing the Care4 electronic medical record to obtain the diagnostic/radiology report; o Identifying and reviewing the diagnostic/radiology report; o Printing the diagnostic/radiology report; o Entering the diagnostic/radiology report into the electronic medical record; o Notifying the physician of the diagnostic/radiology result; o Ordering physician reviewing the diagnostic/radiology result and taking appropriate action; and o Nursing staff will document the notification of the physician and any orders given in the EMR. The Interim Director of Nursing/Designee has reinforced and re-educated all nursing staff on the process for ordering, obtaining the results, reviewing the results, and notification of the physician for radiology/diagnostic tests. For the details on the measures implemented, see the section below entitled Facility's Plan to Ensure Compliance Quickly. (Completed: August 10, 2023) 4. The Medical Director has issued a written communication to physicians reeducating them on the expectations with respect to the ordering and reviewing of results of radiology/diagnostic tests for residents. 5. The Interim Director of Nursing/Designee will audit all incident/accident reports of falls for the past thirty (30) days to ensure that proper nursing assessments were completed following the fall. 6. The Interim Director of Nursing/Designee has re-educated staff members on recognizing the risk factors for falls, fall precautions, resident assessment, appropriate documentation, and how to properly escalate following falls. 7. The Interim Director of Nursing/Designee has re-educated staff members (nurses and therapists) on the assessment and documentation of changes in resident's condition and escalation to physician, as necessary. In addition, the Interim Director of Nursing/Designee has re-educated nursing staff on the timely performance and documentation of pain assessments (within thirty minutes for IV medications and one (1) hour for oral medications), as well as the administration of pain medications in accordance with physician orders. ***All staff members will be educated on the topics outlined above before being allowed to work a shift. Completion Date: August 10, 2023 Facility's Plan to Ensure Compliance Quickly: How will the facility ensure compliance efficiently and timely? This could involve developing policies and procedures, training staff, repairing equipment, contacting physicians, having a QAIP meeting, developing forms, making repairs, or developing a new system. Be sure to document who provides the training, dates of training and how competency of staff of learning and training (return demonstrations, testing, competency checks). Please make sure dates of trainings are documented and if staff involvement is required that the staff member will not assume any job responsibilities until training has been received by them. Please make sure all audits, policies, notifications or services provided by outside contractors to remove the potential harm are dated. 1. The Interim Director of Nursing/Designee will audit all current residents (as of August 1, 2023) to confirm that all ordered radiology/diagnostic tests were performed, results placed in the electronic medical record, the physician notified of the results, and the physician reviewed the tests and took appropriate action, as necessary. See the details of the plan for continued auditing/monitoring outlined on page 5. 2. The Interim Director of Nursing/Designee and the Director of Operations are reviewing relevant facility policies and procedures to determine whether revisions are necessary to be consistent with the outlined measures in this Plan. 3. The facility Medical Director will re-educate all physicians via written communication about the process for ordering and reviewing the results of radiology/diagnostic tests. 4. By August 8, 2023, the Interim Director of Nursing/Designee is re-educating of all nursing staff members on the following topics: a) The end-to-end process for the ordering and completion of all radiology/diagnostic tests: o Confirming that there is a physician order for the diagnostic/radiology test; o Confirming that the diagnostic/radiology test is completed as ordered by the physician; o Accessing the Care4 electronic medical record to obtain the diagnostic/radiology report; o Identifying and reviewing the diagnostic/radiology report; o Printing the diagnostic/radiology report; o Entering the diagnostic/radiology report into the electronic medical record; o Notifying the physician of the diagnostic/radiology result; o Ordering physician reviewing the diagnostic/radiology result and taking appropriate action; and o Nursing staff will document the notification of the physician and any orders given in the EMR. b) Effective hand-off communication between shifts. This communication will include whether there are any pending orders for radiology/diagnostic tests; whether any radiology/diagnostic tests were performed; whether the results of any radiology/diagnostic tests are available; whether the final radiology/diagnostic test results have been printed and entered into the electronic medical records; whether the physician has been notified of the results of the radiology/diagnostic tests; and whether the physician gave any follow-up orders based on the radiology/diagnostic tests. c) The timely performance and documentation of pain assessments (within thirty minutes for IV medications and one (1) hour for oral medications), as well as the administration of pain medications in accordance with physician orders. d) The assessment and documentation of changes in a resident's condition and escalation to the physician, as necessary. e) The process for notifying the resident's physician if there are issues with pain control. f) The facility's existing policy on fall prevention. g) The facility's incident and accident reporting policy. h) The re-assessment of residents including, but not limited to, neurovascular checks up to 72 hours following a fall. ***All staff members will be educated on the topics outlined above before being allowed to work a shift. Completion Date: August 10, 2023 Monitoring: In an interview on 08/11/23 at 02:48 PM, CNA A said she had received training on 08/09/23 about the accident/incident reporting process as well as the fall procedure. CNA understood the trainings and she was able to explain the actions to be taken. In an interview on 08/12/23 at 09:05 AM, RN D said she received one-on-one training with the IP on radiology and laboratory reports/shifts to shift communications, facility fall policy, accident/incident reporting expectations, pain assessment, pain management and physician escalation. RN E understood the trainings and she was able to explain the actions to be taken. In an interview on 08/13/23 at 08:03 AM, RN E said she did not receive one-on-one training on the facility fall policy, radiology and laboratory reports/shift to shift communications. accident/incident reporting expectations, abuse and neglect, documentation and physician escalation, . She said she was informed by RN D that training needed to be completed and she reviewed the papers left at the nursing station. RN E understood the trainings and she was able to explain the actions to be taken. In an interview on 08/13/23 at 07:02 PM, RN G said she received one on one in servicing falls, MD escalation, accident/incident reporting, pain assessments, change of conditions, radiology/laboratory reports, physician escalations and shift to shift communications. RN G understood the trainings and she was able to explain the actions to be taken. In an interview on 08/13/23 at 07:16 PM, RN D said she received one on one in servicing, falls, MD escalation, accident/incident reporting, radiology/laboratory reports, physician escalations, pain management. documentation and changes of condition. RN D understood the trainings and she was able to explain the actions to be taken. In an interview on 08/13/23 at 07:24 PM, RN I said she received one on one in servicing on , falls, MD escalation, radiology/laboratory reports, accident/incident reporting, change of conditions and documentation. RN I understood the trainings and she was able to explain the actions to be taken. In an interview on 08/14/23 at 11:40 AM, the DON said she had not completed a full audit of the accident/incidents specifically falls. She said she just confirmed that she had taken action on the fall, she had not thoroughly reviewed each fall to ensure that the proper nursing assessments were completed following the fall as stated in the approved POR. In an interview on 08/15.23 at 09:49 AM, the DON said she completed a full audit on all falls in the last 30 days the previous evening (08/14/23) to ensure appropriate action/nursing assessments were completed following falls. She said her audit identified consistent deficiencies in completion of neuros/assessments, documentation and follow up after these incidents. Record review of facility Order Listing Report, dated 08/08/23, revealed all pending radiology/diagnostic orders and results were reviewed and appropriate action taken by the DON. Record review of facility in-services records revealed facility staff were trained on the following: 08/07/23 TO 08/08/23 Accidents and Incidents, attendees included- RN E, LVN E, LVN A, LVN B, RN A, LVN G, RN F, LVN F, RN G - 08/08/23 to 08/09/23 Change in condition Assessment and Reporting, attendees included- RN A, LVN B, RN C, LVN E, LVNA, LVN G, RN F, LVN F, RN G - 08/08/23 to 08/09/23 Escalation/Chain of Command Procedure, attendees included- RN C, RN A, LVN B, LVN E, RN F, LVN F, LVN G, RN G, RN E, LVN A - 08/08/23 Following MD orders for Medication Administration Parameters, attendees included- LVN A, LVN B, LVN D, LVN E, LVN F, LVN G, RN A, RN E, RN F, RN G - 08/08/23 Falls Program and Incident Report, attendees included- LN E, LVN B, RN A, RN F, LVN F, LVN G, RN G - 08/09/23 Pain Assessment and Reassessment, attendees included- RN A, RN C, LVN A, - 08/09/23 Falls Program, attendees included- LVN B, RN C, RN E, RN C, RN B,, LVN A - 08/09/23 Reviewing, Printing out & filing diagnostic reports, attendees included- RN A, RN C, RN E, LVN A, LVN F, RN D, LVN B - 08/11/23 Fall Procedure, attendees included- RN C, RN D, LVN E, RN A - 08/11/23 Documentation (Admission; Fall Risk Assessment; Pain Tool, Transfer Form, SBAR, Change of Condition), attendees included- RN C, RN D, LVN E, RN A Record review of facility email titled Immediate Attention to Radiology/Diagnostic Services Results dated 08/08/23 at 05:15 PM and signed by the Medical Director revealed, the Medical Director notified the facility affiliated physicians the following: 1- for newly admitted patients, radiology/diagnostic services orders must address the patient's immediate needs. 2- results for routine radiology/diagnostic service must be reviewed within 24 hours of being notified that results are available 3- for stat orders, results must be reviewed within 2 hours of being notified that results are available. 4- acknowledgement of receipt and review of results must be documented in the patients EMR and a note of the plan of care must be included, Record review of a facility email titled Policies Reviewed UP dated 08/11/23 at 10:44 PM revealed the following policies were reviewed for needed changes by facility management: Pain assessment/reassessment and management, admission process, medication administration, incidents/accidents, medication reconciliation, escalation/chain of command, acute condition changes, ANE, administrating pain medications, standard medication administration times and critical results reporting policy. Record review of the facility Accident/Incident Audit revealed, the facility had identified failures in assessments following incidents, documentation or follow up on 10 out of 11 falls in the last 30 days. The Administrator was informed the IJ was removed on 08/15/23 at 03:48 PM. The facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of actual harm and a scope of pattern due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems that were put into place.
CRITICAL (K)

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Administration (Tag F0835)

Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure it was administered in a manner that enables i...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure it was administered in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 3 out of 5 residents (Resident #235, Resident #237 and Resident #238) reviewed for administration. - The facility administration failed to thoroughly investigate immediately following Resident #238's fall leading to the resident having an unidentified fall for 6 days and failed to report an allegation of neglect following the identification of the fracture. - The facility administration failed to have a system in place to audit pending/missed laboratory/radiology findings resulting in Resident #238 in pain for 6 days following a fall - The facility administration failed to have systems to audit resident medication entry/acquisition/administration and pain management for accuracy and efficacy resulting in Resident #235 and Resident #237 experiencing pain on a scale of 07-10 out of 10. On 08/09/23 12:15 PM an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified. While the IJ was removed on 08/15/23 at 02:10 PM, the facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of actual harm and a scope of pattern due to the facility continuing to monitor the implementation and effectiveness of their plan of removal. These failures could affect residents at risk for delayed identification of health conditions/treatment, severe injury, delated treatment and death. Findings include: Resident #238 Record review of Resident #238's Face Sheet date 08/11/23 revealed, a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included; type 2 diabetes, UTI, unspecified fall and back fracture. The resident transferred to an acute care facility on 08/03/23. Record review of Resident #238's admission MDS dated [DATE] revealed, intact cognition as indicated by a BIMS score of 15 out of 15. Record review of Resident #238's Baseline Care Plan dated 07/21/23 revealed, the resident planned to return to her own home following rehabilitation, one person physical assist with most ADLs, always continent of both bladder and bowel, and a history of falls. Record review of Resident #238's Accident/Incident Report dated 07/23/23 signed by LVN A revealed, the resident was found on the floor of the restroom besides the toilet. The patient said she fell while trying to wash her hands, she hit her butt pretty hard and her back really hurts, hell everything hurts. Record review of Resident #238's Progress Notes dated 07/23/23 at 05:18 AM signed by LVN A revealed, the resident was found on the bathroom floor and reported her butt and back really hurt. The resident was assessed for new injuries and none were discovered. The resident reported pain at 9 out of 10 and NP A gave an order for Acetaminophen 500 mg to be administered for pain. There was no documentation of the resident's ROM or initiation of Neurochecks. Record review of Resident #238's Accident/Incident Report dated 07/28/23 signed by LVN A revealed, the resident was found on the floor screaming in pain. Resident #238 could not remember how she got to the floor. Record review of Resident #238's Progress Notes dated 07/28/23 at 05:38 AM signed by LVN A revealed, Resident #238 was found lying on the floor near her walker and the vacant bed. Resident was screaming in pain and was assisted into a chair by staff members and the resident complained of left leg and hip pain. NP A w as notified and she gave orders for a STAT xray and administration of Acetaminophen. There was no documentation of neuro checks being initiated, specific of a head-to-toe assessment or assessment of Resident #238's ROM. Record review of Resident 238's paper and electronic chart revealed, LVN A did not perform any neuro checks on the resident following her falls on 07/23/23 or 07/28/23. There was no follow-up documented following Resident #238's fall on 07/23/23. LVN A did not complete a fall risk assessment for Resident #238's fall on 07/28/23. There was no follow-up documented following Resident #238's fall on 07/28/23 Record review of Resident #238's Progress Notes dated 07/28/23 at 3:09 PM signed by RN C revealed, Resident #238 complained of pain to right thigh/leg and then complained about severe pain to left thigh and leg. The resident was seen by the NP and new orders were given for Tramadol (pain medication) and labs. The xray tech reported Resident #238 was not cooperative during the first xray so the patient had to be taken to the xray department. Record review of Resident #238's Xray Final Report printed on 07/28/23 at 05:33 PM revealed, Xray left femur- left femur intertrochanteric (where the leg bone meets the hip bone) fracture. Record review of text conversation between RN C and NP A dated 07/28/23 revealed, RN C sent pictures to NP A of Resident #238's xray report that indicated a left femur fracture at 06:24 AM. At 07/28/23 a 06:38 PM NP A responded back with looks normal. Record review of Resident #238's Physician's Order written 07/28/23 revealed, X-ray Right Femur and Right Leg for post fall pain one time only until 07/28/23 at 23:59 PM. There was no order entered for the left leg/hip and there was only 1 order entered on 07/28/23. Record review of Resident #238's Progress Notes from 07/28/23 to 08/02/23 revealed, no documentation of the resident's xray finding of left femur fracture and no documented notification to the physician of the pending xray results. Record review of Resident #238's OT Daily note dated 07/31/23 revealed, Resident #238 refused to get out of the room to do therapy in the gym. The resident reported pain to her left leg 9/10 on the pain scale. Resident #238 refused to do any standing exercises or activities and was highly sensitive with lower extremity movement. There was no documentation of the resident having a fracture. Record review of Resident #238's OT Daily note dated 08/01/23 revealed, Resident #238 continued to report pain to her left leg at 9/10 on the pain scale. Any slight movement intensifies pain. Increased lower extremity swelling and pain to the left leg restricts movement. There was no documentation of the resident having a fracture. Record review of Resident #238's OT Daily note dated 08/02/23 revealed, Resident #238 refused to do any standing or lower extremities exercises/movement. The resident was agreeable to perform upper extremity exercises. Resident #238 refused to do toilet training and upper body/lower-body ADLs due to her pain being unbearable. The resident said it's worse than having a baby. There was no documentation of the resident having a fracture. Record review of Resident #238's PT Daily note dated 08/02/23 revealed, patient unable to move lower left extremity due to increase pain. Patient unable to stand due to increase pain in left hip and knee. Resident #238 stated 9/10 pain on left hip, knee, and below knee nursing notified about the pain. There was no documentation of the resident having a fracture. Record review of Resident #238's Physician Notes dated 08/02/23 revealed, Resident #238 had edema (swelling) to left lower leg and reported pain when examined. Ongoing edema with the pain, concerned about bone/soft tissue involvement, requested a stat x-ray but resident declined. Resident continues to report pain to the left leg but phone call, previous x-ray was negative. The note was signed by NP A on 08/08/23 at 12:00 AM. Record review of Resident #238's Physician Notes dated 08/03/23 revealed, X-ray reviewed showed left hip fracture, Resident #238 continued to have pain and had difficulty putting weight on the left leg. The resident was on tramadol and ibuprofen on an alternating schedule with no benefits. The note was signed by MD A on 08/06/23 at 3:07 PM. In an interview on 08/07/23 at 12:36 PM, MD A said Identification of Resident #238's femur fracture from 07/28/23 was missed from top to bottom. She said once the fracture was identified on 08/03/23 the resident was sent out to the hospital immediately because the facility cannot manage a hip fracture without first receiving an orthopedic consult. MD A said NP A was responsible for receiving the xray results from 07/28/23 and was managing the patient with Tramadol and Ibuprofen scheduled every 6 hours. In an interview on 08/07/23 at 12:50 PM, NP A said Resident #238. NP A said on Friday 07/28/23 she received a call saying Resident #238's x rays were negative for fracture and she did not receive a second call notifying her of the fracture. She said during her clinical assessment the resident presented with a swollen leg which was suspicious for a fracture and was also experiencing a decline in function and increased pain. NP A said when a provider places an order for an Xray, nursing staff are expected to enter the orders and once the test are completed notification must be provided to the NP/MD by phone notification. In an interview on 08/07/23 at 02:06 PM, the Therapy Manager said upon admission Resident #238 was not bad and she experienced falls on 07/23/23 and 07/28/23. He said there was no change in the resident after her fall on 07/23/23 but when she sustained a fall on 07/28/23 which led to a drastic change in function. He said Resident #238 went from just requiring supervision with ADLs/ambulation at admission to requiring 2 people maximum assistance following the fall, and the resident reported pain on a scale from 06-9 with movement. In an interview on 08/07/23 at 4:58 PM, the Administrator said Resident #238's fall was not reported on 08/03/23 because she only had to report injury of unknown origin and the resident's fracture was from a fall. In an interview on 08/07/23 at 05:23 PM, the Administrator said the DON was responsible for completing retrospective reviews of lab/radiology reports to ensure that the results are read, fractures identified, notifications are completed and action is taking immediately on any acute negative radiological findings. She said the DON was responsible for starting an investigation immediately following an accident/incident like a fall. The Administrator said it was the DON's responsibility to review the incident to ensure that all assessments were completed, all MD specified orders were entered, all radiology/laboratory tests were performed with the results communicated to the provider. In an interview on 08/07/23 at 5:34 PM, the DON said after Resident #238's fall on 07/28/23 the resident received 2 xray results but there was no order entered for the 2nd xray so she couldn't track it. She said all xray results should be reviewed by the nurse and the physician should be notified via a phone call of the findings. The DON said failure to identify xray results timely could result in a delay in treatment, the resident developing a clot from the fracture and uncontrolled pain. The [NAME] said she was unaware that LVN A did not complete neuro checks and all necessary assessments for Resident #238 following the fall on 07/28/23. In an interview on 08/08/23 at 06:58 AM, LVN A said on 07/28/23 she walked into the room and found Resident #238 on the floor by the unoccupied resident's bed. She said Resident #238 didn't know what happened. She said the facility policy requires a head to toe assessment including the resident's ROM prior to moving the resident as well as neuro checks. LVN A said she did not initiate neuro checks on Resident #238 after the fall because she forgot and the fall occurred almost at the time of her shift. She said she was unable to assess Resident #238's left leg ROM because the resident would not allow her to touch it. LVN A said Resident #238 said it hurt and told the staff not to move her. She said Resident #238 said the pain was really bad in her hip and when the staff tried to get her to lie down she refused. LVN A said in retrospect the resident should not have been moved from the floor since she was in severe pain and her ROM could not be assessed. She said failure to assess residents properly following a fall could place residents at risk for fracture, infection, discomfort, neurological issues if the resident hit their heat and development of a blood clot at the site of the fracture. LVN A said she could not remember the specifics of Resident #238's fall on 07/23/23. In an interview on 08/09/23 at 08:40 AM, the Interim DON said following a fall nursing staff must immediately assess residents for injury including ROM assessments prior to moving the resident, any bleeding and initiation of neurological checks. She said the resident must be followed for 72 hours to ensure no injuries occurred. She said the DON is responsible for immediately reviewing the residents chart to make sure all of the information regarding the accident/incident is correct and appropriate action/follow up was performed. The interim DON said she reviewed Resident #238's fall the next day (07/29/23) but she did not go into detail so she did not identify LVN A did not initiate neuro checks on Resident #238 following her falls on 07/23/23 and 07/28/23 and assessments were not completed as required by the fall protocol. She said looking at the situation now Resident #238 was not assessed appropriately following the fall, no neuros were performed and documentation did not indicate the residents ROM. The Interim DON said she was still working on the investigation into Resident 238's fall with injury so she did not know who was responsible for the failure but the incomplete assessments and missed fracture should have been caught. She said she did not perform retrospective review of pending labs or accident/incidents and Resident #238's unidentified fracture seemed to have resulted from a multi system failure. In an interview on 08/09/23 at 09:40 AM, the Interim DON said she was notified of Resident #238's fall and complaint of pain 07/28/23 and she before she left in the evening she was aware that the resident had a pending x-ray result. She said she did not properly investigate Resident #238's fall and she did not go back to check on the pending xray results. The DON said she did not review the residents paper and electronic chart to determine if all necessary notifications and assessments were completed but instead interviewed the staff about the incident. The DON said she did not go through the facility fall protocol when reviewing Resident #238's fall on 07/28/23. The Interim DON said on 08/03/23 she was notified by the IP that Resident #238 's xray from 07/28/23 resulted in a left femur fracture so she started looking into the investigation. She said she didn't think she was properly trained to perform her DON roll because she was unaware of her obligation to perform retrospective reviews on nursing services. In an interview on 08/09/23 at 10:24 AM, the Administrator said she was notified of Resident #238's fall on 07/28/23 and the DON is responsible for investigating all reported incidents to ensure the appropriate action and follow up is performed. The Administrator said all accidents/incidents must be reviewed by nursing within 24 hours and on the weekend there is a manager on duty and a nurse on call, and on 07/28/23 the Interim DON was the nurse on call thus making her responsible for investigating the incident. She said she was made aware of the unidentified fracture on 08/03/23 by the Therapy Director and after reviewing the chart the accident/incident and falls policy was not followed, the incident was not investigated, the resident was not followed up immediately and for 72 hours following the incident. The Administrator said failures should have been caught on day 1 and it is clear that these things did not occur when referring to proper investigation on accident/incidents. She said neglect does not have to be done intentionally and when asked if failure to promptly identify Resident #238's fracture leaving the resident in pain for 6 days was a form of neglect she said it was not because the injury resulted from a fall and was not an injury of unknown origin. When asked what action should have been taken on 08/03/23 when she was notified of the fall, the Administrator said the facility took appropriate action by sending the resident to the hospital. The administrator said the quality department was made aware of the 6 day late unidentified fracture and they made the decision on how to handle the incident. In an interview on 08/09/23 at 11:54 PM the VP of Ambulatory Care said that there is an incident reporting triage process. She said first the facility staff notify the Administrator/DON of the incident, who the notify the quality department. She said in corroboration with the quality and legal department the Administrator/designee reports the incident to the state. The VP of ambulatory services said she was only made aware of the incident involving Resident #238 after the IJ for radiology was called on 08/07/23 and that the Administrator did not report Resident #238's fall with fracture to the quality team. She said the administrator was solely responsible for the failure to report the incident to the state. Resident #235 Record review of Resident #235's face sheet dated 06/28/23 revealed, a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: acute kidney failure, UTI and unspecified fall. The resident discharged on 07/18/23. Record review of Resident #235's secondary Face Sheet dated 06/28/23 at 10:28 AM revealed, Resident #235 admitted to the facility on [DATE] at 09:01 PM. Record review of Resident #235's Baseline Care Plan dated 06/27/23 revealed, the resident was alert & oriented and experiencing generalized aching pain Record review of Resident #235's Hospital Discharge Record dated 06/27/23 at 03:45 PM revealed, Resident #235's next scheduled dose of pain medications as follows: - Famotidine 20 mg (used to treat acid reflux) 6/28/23 at 8:00 AM. - Morphine 15 mg ER (an opioid pain medication)- 06/27/23 at 09:00 PM. Oxycodone 10 mg (an opioid pain medication)- 06/27/23 at 06:00 PM. - Metronidazole 500 mg (an antibiotic)- 06/27/23 at 08:00 PM. - Simvastatin 20 mg (used to treat high cholesterol)- 06/27/23 at bedtime. - Hydralazine 50 mg ( used to treat high blood pressure)- 09:00 PM. Record review of Resident #235's Order Summary Report dated 06/28/23 revealed, - Morphine Sulfate 15 mg- give 1 tablet by mouth every 12 hours for pain ordered on 06/27/23 with a start date of 06/28/23. - Oxycodone 10 mg- give 1 tablet by mouth every 6 hours for pain ordered on 06/27/23 with a start date of 06/28/23 - Simvastatin 20 mg- give 1 tablet by mouth at bedtime for hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol) ordered on 06/27/23 with a start date of 06/28/23 - Metronidazole 500 mg- 1 tablet by mouth every 8 hours ordered on 06/27/23 with a start date of 06/28/23 - Hydralazine 50 mg - 1 tablet by mouth four times a day for high blood pressure ordered on 06/27/23 with a start date of 06/28/23 - Famotidine 20 mg (used to treat acid reflux)- give 1 tablet by mouth for acid reflux scheduled for 06/28/23 at 08:00 AM. Record review of Resident #235's Progress Note dated 06/28/23 revealed, the residents medications had not been delivered by the pharmacy and her name was not in the automated dispensing machine so medication could not be pulled from the e-kit. When Resident #235 was notified that her medication was not available, the resident informed the facility that she had her Morphine and Oxycodone at home and she asked if her son brought them to the facility could the facility staff administer it. Record review of Resident #235's June MAR printed 06/28/23 at 12:50 PM revealed, her medications were not started until 06/28/23 and the following medications were not administered: - Famotidine 20 mg (used to treat acid reflux)- give 1 tablet by mouth for acid reflux scheduled for 06/28/23 at 08:00 AM. - Oxycodone 10 mg- give 1 tablet by mouth every 6 hours due at 06/28/23 at 12:00 AM. The start date was not entered until 06/28/23 at 06:00 AM. - Oxycodone 10 mg- give 1 tablet by mouth every 6 hours scheduled for 06/28/23 at 06:00 AM. Reason not administered- medication not available. - Morphine Sulfate 15 mg ER- give 1 tablet by mouth every 12 hours for pain due at 06/27/23 at 09:00 PM. The Order was entered incorrectly as Morphine Sulfate 15 mg (IR) with a start date of 06/28/23 at 08:00 AM - Simvastatin 20 mg- 1 tablet by mouth at bedtime for hyperlipidemia due at 08:00 PM on 06/27/23. The start date not scheduled till 06/28/23. - Metronidazole 500 mg- give 1 tablet by mouth every 8 hours for cellulitis( bacterial skin infection) for 7 days due at 06/27/23 at 08:00 PM. Start date entered as 06/28/23 at 12:00 AM. - Metronidazole 500 mg- give 1 tablet by mouth every 8 hours for cellulitis( bacterial skin infection) for 7 days scheduled for 06/28/23 at 12:00 AM. Reason not administered- medication not available. - Hydralazine 50 mg- give 1 tablet by mouth four times a day for high blood pressure due at 06/27/23 at 09:00 PM. Start date entered as 06/28/23 at 08:00 AM Record review of Resident #235's Pharmacy Records dated 06/28/23 revealed, MD A did not submit electronic prescriptions for Resident #235's Oxycodone 10 mg and Morphine ER 15 mg until 06/28/23 at 05:31 PM, over 20 hours after the resident's admission. Record review of Resident #235's June MAR dated 06/28/23 at 12:50 PM revealed the following pain scores: - 05 out of 10 on 06/28/23 at 04:19 PM - 10 out of 10 when Resident was administered her Morphine 15 mg scheduled for 08:00 AM. - 08 out of 10 when Resident was administered her Oxycodone 10 mg scheduled for 12:00 PM. Record review of Resident #235's Physician's Notes from 06/27/23 to 07/18/23 revealed, no documentation of reported ineffective pain management, uncontrolled pain, or pain scores that remained the same after medication administration by nursing staff. Record review of Resident #235's June Progress Notes revealed, no documentation of unchanged or increased pain scores which indicated ineffective pain management and no documentation of MD notification of inefficient pain management. No documentation of post medication administration pain assessments to determine if the medication administered was effective. Record review of Resident #235's Oxycodone 10 mg ER June MAR revealed, - increased pain recorded on 06/28/23 between 06:00 AM and 12:00 PM doses from a 3 to an 8 out of 10. - unchanged pain recorded on 06/28/23 between 12:00 PM and 08:00 PM doses at an 8 out of 10. - unchanged pain recorded on 06/29/23 between 12:00 AM and 06:00 AM doses at a 5 out of 10. - increased pain recorded on 06/29/23 between 06:00 AM and 12:00 PM doses from a 5 to a 7 out of 10. increased pain recorded on 06/29/23 between 12:00 AM and 06:00 PM doses from a 7 to an 8 out of 10. - unchanged pain recorded on 06/30/23 between 12:00 AM and 06:00 AM doses at a 5 out of 10. Record review of Resident #235' July Progress Notes revealed, no documentation of unchanged or increased pain scores which indicate ineffective pain management and no documentation of MD notification of inefficient pain management. No documentation of post medication administration pain assessments to determine if the medication administered was effective. Record review of Resident #235's Oxycodone 10 mg ER July MAR revealed, - increased pain from a 0 to a 4 out of 10 on 07/03/23 between 06:00 PM to 07/0/423 at 12:00 AM doses. - increased pain from a 0 to a 5 out of 10 on 07/04/23 between 12:00 Pm to 06:00 PM doses. - increased pain from a 3 to an 8 out of 10 on 07/06/23 between 12:00 PM to 06:00 PM doses. - increased pain from a 2 to an 9 out of 10 on 07/07/23 between 12:00 PM to 06:00 PM doses. - unchanged pain at 5 out of 10 recorded on 07/08/23 between 12:00 AM and 06:00 AM doses. - unchanged pain at 5 out of 10 recorded on 07/09/23 between 12:00 AM and 06:00 AM doses. - increased pain from a 5 to 6 out of 10 on 07/09/23 between 06:00 AM to 12:00 PM doses. - unchanged pain at 6 out of 10 recorded on 07/09/23 between 12:00 PM and 06:00 PM doses. - increased pain from a 3 to an 8 out of 10 on 07/11/23 between 06:00 AM to 12:00 PM doses. - increased pain from a 2 to a 9 out of 10 on 07/12/23 between 06:00 AM to 12:00 PM doses. Record review of Resident #235's Medication Administration Audit from 06/27/23 to 07/18/23 dated 08/03/23 revealed, the resident received her Oxycodone and Morphine outside of scheduled administration times on 23 different occasions during her stay: 1- Morphine ER 15 mg scheduled for 06/28/23 at 08:00 AM, administered at 09:15 PM; The medication was not available 2- Morphine ER 15 mg scheduled for 06/30/23 at 08:00 PM, administered at 09:33 PM; There was no documented reason for the late administration. 3- Morphine ER 15 mg scheduled for 07/01/23 at 08:00 AM, administered at 09:05 PM; There was no documented reason for the late administration. 4- Oxycodone 10 mg scheduled for 07/02/23 at 06:00 PM, administered at 07:11 PM; There was no documented reason for the late administration. 5- Morphine ER 15 mg scheduled for 07/02/23 at 08:00 PM, administered at 11:32 PM; There was no documented reason for the late administration. 6- Morphine ER 15 mg scheduled for 07/03/23 at 08:00 PM, administered at 09:58 PM: There was no documented reason for the late administration. 7- Oxycodone 10 mg scheduled for 07/04/23 at 06:00 AM, administered at 07:05 AM; There was no documented reason for the late administration. 8- Morphine ER 15 mg scheduled for 07/04/23 at 08:00 AM, administered at 09:15 AM; There was no documented reason for the late administration. 9- Morphine ER 15 mg scheduled for 07/04/23 at 08:00 PM, administered at 10:44 PM: There was no documented reason for the late administration. 10- Morphine ER 15 mg scheduled for 07/06/23 at 08:00 AM, administered at 09:19 AM; There was no documented reason for the late administration. 11- Morphine ER 15 mg scheduled for 07/06/23 at 08:00 PM, administered at 09:20 PM; There was no documented reason for the late administration. 12- Morphine ER 15 mg scheduled for 07/07/23 at 08:00 AM, administered at 11:53AM; There was no documented reason for the late administration. 13- Morphine ER 15 mg scheduled for 07/07/23 at 08:00 PM, administered at 09:03 PM; There was no documented reason for the late administration. 14- Morphine ER 15 mg scheduled for 07/08/23 at 08:00 AM, administered at 11:03AM; There was no documented reason for the late administration. 15- Morphine ER 15 mg scheduled for 07/08/23 at 08:00 PM, administered at 10:07 PM; There was no documented reason for the late administration. 16- Morphine ER 15 mg scheduled for 07/09/23 at 08:00 AM, administered at 09:30AM; There was no documented reason for the late administration. 17- Morphine ER 15 mg scheduled for 07/10/23 at 08:00 PM, administered at 09:05 PM; There was no documented reason for the late administration. 18- Oxycodone 10 mg scheduled on 07/12/23 at 12:00 AM, administered at 3:16 AM; There was no documented reason for the late administration. 19- Oxycodone 10 mg scheduled for 07/14/23 at 12:00 PM, administered at 02:17 PM; The medication ran out of refills. 20- Morphine ER 15 mg scheduled for 07/16/23 at 08:00 AM, administered at 10:05 AM 21- Oxycodone 10 mg scheduled for 07/17/23 at 06:00 PM, administered at 07:30 PM; There was no documented reason for the late administration. 22- Morphine ER 15 mg scheduled for 07/17/23 at 08:00 PM, administered at 09:12 PM; There was no documented reason for the late administration. 23- Morphine ER 15 mg scheduled for 07/18/23 at 08:00 AM, administered at 09:03 AM; There was no documented reason for the late administration. An observation on 06/28/23 at 08:45 AM revealed, Resident #235's family member approaching RN B while she prepared for medication administration to Resident #235. He said that he was very upset with the facility because prior to admission he was assured that Resident #235's medication would be available upon her admission but it was not. He said Resident #235 called him multiple times overnight to inform him that she had not received any of her medication since she arrived at the facility and she was in severe pain. Resident #235's family member then handed RN B 2 bottles of medication (Morphine ER 15 mg and Oxycodone 10 mg) and said he brought only a 2 days' supply to cover Resident #235 until the medication arrived at the facility. After Resident #235's family member entered the resident's room, RN B alerted the Interim DON to the arrival of the mediation at which point they both counted the medications and logged them into individual control sheets. In an interview on 06/28/23 at 10:10 AM, RN B said Resident #235 admitted to the facility on the night shift of 06/27/23. She said the patient's medications had not yet arrived from the pharmacy and the night shift nurse said Resident #235's family member would be bringing her pain medication so she was waiting for its arrival. When asked if RN B could have pulled the rest of Resident #235's unavailable medication from the facility EKit (floor stock of prescription medications available for emergency use), she said she administered the OTC medications as well as the pain medication brought in by the family member but she would have to check the facility EKit for the rest of Resident #235's medications. RN B said she immediately administered Morphine ER 15 mg to Resident #235 once it was delivered by the resident's family member but the Oxycodone was not due yet. She could not say when Resident #235 received her last dose of Oxycodone. RN B said failure to administer medications as ordered could place residents at risk for uncontrolled disease states such as uncontrolled pain. In an interview on 06/28/23 at 10:35 AM, the Interim DON said she was notified by RN B and the Surveyor about the delay in receiving Resident #235's medication and the resident's family member had to bring in a 5 days supply. She said she notified the MD to get an immediate order. In an interview on 08/01/23 at 12:43 PM, the Interim DON said nursing staff are expected to call the physician with all delayed control substances to expediate the process. Once the physician has been notified nursing must then call the pharmacy for a stat order which takes about 2 hours to deliver once the prescription is sent. The surveyor once again notified the Interim DON of the delay is prescriptions from the prescriber. In an interview on 08/13/23 at 08:03 AM, RN E said she was the admitting nurse for Resident #235 on 06/28/23. She said when the resident admitted to the facility she entered reconciled the medications with the provider, including the Resident #235's pain medications Oxycodone and Morphine. She said when she notified the provider, the provider stated that late admissions always resulted in problems with CII medication acquisition because they were unable to electronically prescribe the medications. Resident #237 Record review of Resident #237's Nurse report dated 07/26/23 revealed, Resident #237 arrived at the facility at 7[TRUNCATED]
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0685 (Tag F0685)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper treatment and assistive devices to maintain hearing a...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper treatment and assistive devices to maintain hearing abilities for 1 (Resident# 6) of 6 residents reviewed for hearing devices. The facility failed to assess Resident #6 for hearing loss she did not receive her hearing aids. This failure could place residents at risk for limited social interactions. The findings included: Record review of Resident #6's undated Face Sheet documented a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of: Arthropathy, Acute conjunctivitis, anemia, hyperkalemia, Dementia, Hypertension, Atrial Fibrillation and hearing deficit. Record review of Resident #6 Care Plan dated 12/12/22 and last care conference dated 01/24/2022 documented no hearing /hearing aid concerns for Resident #6. Interview On 06/28/23 at 2:51 PM, the Social Worker (SS) stated Resident # 6 was private pay, not aware that Resident #6 was having any issues with her hearing or had a need for hearing aids . The SS stated she had visited with Resident #6 about 2 weeks ago. Record review on 06/28/23 at 3:00 PM MDS section B was flagged noting Resident # 6 had hearing deficits. Interview On 06/28/23 at 3:01 pm, Surveyor asked the SS if there was a policy/procedure regarding hearing devices such as hearing aids. The SW replied no, no policy procedure regarding hearing aids. The SS stated she received information from the nursing department about residents with hearing concerns such as hearing aids. The SS stated she had not received any information that Resident # 6 needed hearing aids. During an interview with Resident #6 on 6/28/23 at 3:30 p.m., Resident#6 stated she had hearing aids but they got lost before she lived here at the facility, would like the facility's SS to assist her with getting new hearing aids.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0740 (Tag F0740)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident received the necessary behavioral health care a...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident received the necessary behavioral health care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being in accordance with the comprehensive assessment and plan of care for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #9) whose records were reviewed for behavioral health services, in that; This deficient practice could residents with documented signs of depression at risk of increased decline in the psychosocial well-being and diminished quality of life. The facility failed to provide pyschological services for Resident #9 The Findings include: Record review of Resident #9 Face Sheet dated 6/28/23 revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses include Dementia , Hypertension, Circulation Disorder, Psychosis, Seizures, Major Depression, Anemia and Hypothyroidism . Record review of Resident #9's Annual MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 11 indicating Cognition is Moderate Impaired. Interview on 6/28/23 at 8:00am Resident #9 stated she felt down, had sleep problems, little energy, poor appetite, feeling bad about self, and trouble concentrating. Resident #9 stated she would like to see a Therapist to talk through her feelings Observation and interview on 06/28/23 at 08:38 AM revealed Resident #9 sitting in bed with a gown on. When asked about activities, Resident #9 stated she used to attend activities, but did not have the energy anymore. Resident #9 further stated if someone would push her in the wheelchair to activities, she would participate, because she was no longer able to ambulate himself. She stated She did not receive in-room activities. Resident #9 stated she was given her depression medication and would feel better as the day go. Resident #9 stated she take Seroquel for her depression for several years. Resident #9 stated she would like to have some one to talk to about feeling sad and depressed. Record review stated that resident #9 was currently being seen by Psychiatrist as needed. Resident #9 was prescribed the following anti psychotics' Trazadone, Seroquel for Depression. Interview on 6/28/23 at 2:30pm the Social Worker stated the facility do not have contracts with outside Psych services to address Residents mental, physical and emotional needs. If Residents present behaviors the psych Doctor was called and Anti-Psychotic medication was provided. The facility Staff expressed they had no alternative approaches to assisted Residents with behaviors other than calling Psychiatrist. Interview 6/29/23 at 11:30am Facility Administrator stated she is in the process of obtaining a contract for psychological services through Team Health until contract was approved residents are seen by primary care physician as of this date no psychological services were provided to residents outside of psychiatrist. The facility Administrator stated no policy or procedure was in place.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations involving neglect was reported immedi...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations involving neglect was reported immediately, or not later than 24 hours if the events that caused the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result serious bodily injury, and reported to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (including to the State Survey Agency and adult protective services where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term facilities) in accordance with State law through established procedures for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #238) reviewed for neglect. - The facility failed to report an allegation of neglect involving Resident #238 on 08/03/23 after a 6 day old fracture from 07/28/23 was identified. This failure could place residents at risk of psychological harm, emotional distress. further neglect . Findings included: Record review of Resident #238's Face Sheet date 08/11/23 revealed, a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included; type 2 diabetes, UTI, unspecified fall and back fracture. The resident transferred to an acute care facility on 08/03/23. Record review of Resident #238's Baseline Care Plan dated 07/21/23 revealed, the resident planned to return to her own home following rehabilitation, one person physical assist with most ADLs, always continent of both bladder and bowel, and a history of falls. Record review of Resident #238's admission MDS dated [DATE] revealed, intact cognition as indicated by a BIMS score of 15 out of 15. Record review of Resident #238's Accident/Incident Report dated 07/28/23 signed by LVN A revealed, the resident was found on the floor screaming in pain. Resident #238 could not remember how she got to the floor. Record review of Resident #238's Progress Notes dated 07/28/23 at 05:38 AM signed by LVN A revealed, Resident #238 was found lying on the floor near her walker and the vacant bed. The resident was screaming in pain and was assisted into a chair by staff members and the resident complained of left leg and hip pain. NP A was notified and she gave orders for a STAT x-ray and administration of Acetaminophen. There was no documentation of neuro checks being initiated, a head-to-toe assessment or assessment of Resident #238's ROM. Record review of Resident #238's paper and electronic charts revealed LVN A did not complete a fall risk assessment for Resident #238's fall on 07/28/23. There was no follow-up documented following Resident #238's fall on 07/28/23 Record review of Resident #238's Progress Notes dated 07/28/23 at 3:09 PM signed by RN C revealed, Resident #238 complained of pain to right thigh/leg and then complained about severe pain to left thigh and leg. The resident was seen by the NP and new orders were given for Tramadol (pain medication) and labs. The x-ray tech reported Resident #238 was not corporative during the first x-ray so the resident had to be taken to the x-ray department. Record review of Resident #238's X-ray Final Report printed on 07/28/23 at 05:33 PM revealed left femur- left femur intertrochanteric (where the leg bone meets the hip bone) fracture. Record review of a text conversation between RN C and NP A dated 07/28/23 revealed RN C sent pictures to NP A of Resident #238's x-ray report that indicated a left femur fracture at 06:24 PM. On 07/28/23 at 06:38 PM NP A responded back with looks normal. Record review of Resident #238's Physician's Order written 07/28/23 revealed, X-ray Right Femur and Right Leg for post fall pain one time only until 07/28/23 at 11:59 PM. There was no order entered for the left leg/hip and there was only 1 order entered on 07/28/23. Record review of Resident #238's Progress Notes from 07/28/23 to 08/02/23 revealed, no documentation of the resident's x-ray findings of the left femur fracture and no documented notification to the physician of the x-ray results. Record review of Resident #238's OT Daily note dated 07/31/23 revealed, Resident #238 refused to get out of the room to do therapy in the gym. The resident reported pain to her left leg 9 out of 10 on the pain scale. Resident #238 refused to do any standing exercises or activities and was highly sensitive with lower extremity movement. There was no documentation of the resident having a fracture. Record review of Resident #238's OT Daily note dated 08/01/23 revealed, Resident #238 continued to report pain to her left leg at 9/10 on the pain scale. Any slight movement intensifies pain. Increased lower extremity swelling and pain to the left leg restricts movement. There was no documentation of the resident having a fracture. Record review of Resident #238's OT Daily note dated 08/02/23 revealed, Resident #238 refused to do any standing or lower extremities exercises/movement. The resident was agreeable to perform upper extremity exercises. Resident #238 refused to do toilet training and upper body/lower-body ADLs due to her pain being unbearable. The resident said it's worse than having a baby. There was no documentation of the resident having a fracture. Record review of Resident #238's PT Daily note dated 08/02/23 revealed, Resident #238 was unable to move lower left extremity due to increase pain. The resident was unable to stand due to increased pain in left hip and knee. Resident #238 stated 9/10 pain on left hip, knee, and below knee; nursing notified about the pain. There was no documentation of the resident having a fracture. Record review of Resident #238's Physician's Notes dated 08/02/23 revealed, Resident #238 had edema (swelling) to the left lower leg and reported pain when examined. Ongoing edema with the pain, concerned about bone/soft tissue involvement, requested a stat x-ray but resident declined. Resident continued to report pain to the left leg but phone call, previous x-ray was negative. The note was signed by NP A on 08/08/23 at 12:00 AM. Record review of Resident #238's Physician's Notes dated 08/03/23 revealed, x-ray reviewed reflected a left hip fracture. Resident #238 continues to have pain and had difficulty putting weight on the left leg. The resident was on tramadol and ibuprofen on an alternating schedule with no benefits. The note was signed by MD A on 08/06/23 at 3:07 PM. In an interview on 08/07/23 at 12:36 PM, MD A said identification of Resident #238's femur fracture from 07/28/23 was missed from top to bottom. She said once the fracture was identified on 08/03/23 the resident was sent out to the hospital immediately because the facility could not manage a hip fracture without first receiving an orthopedic consult. MD A said NP A was responsible for receiving the x-ray results from 07/28/23 and was managing the resident with Tramadol and Ibuprofen scheduled every 6 hours. In an interview on 08/07/23 at 12:50 PM, NP A said Resident #238. NP A said on Friday 07/28/23 she received a call saying Resident #238's x-rays were negative for a fracture and she did not receive a second call notifying her of the fracture. She said during her clinical assessment the resident presented with a swollen leg which was suspicious for a fracture and was also experiencing a decline in function and increased pain. NP A said when a provider placed an order for an x-ray, nursing staff were expected to enter the orders and once the test was completed, notification must be provided to the NP/MD by phone notification. In an interview on 08/07/23 at 02:06 PM, the Therapy Manager said upon admission Resident #238 was not bad and she experienced falls on 07/23/23 and 07/28/23. He said there was no change in the resident after her fall on 07/23/23 but when she sustained a fall on 07/28/23 which led to a drastic change in function. He said Resident #238 went from just requiring supervision with ADLs/ambulation at admission to requiring 2 people maximum assistance following the fall, and the resident reported pain on a scale from 06-9 with movement. In an interview on 08/07/23 at 4:58 PM, the Administrator said Resident #238's fall was not reported on 08/03/23 because she only had to report injury of unknown origin and the resident's fracture was from a fall. In an interview on 08/09/23 at 10:24 AM, the Administrator said she was notified of Resident #238's fall on 07/28/23 and the DON was responsible for investigating all reported incidents to ensure the appropriate action and follow up is performed. She said she was made aware of the unidentified fracture on 08/03/23 by the Therapy Director and after reviewing the chart the accident/incident and falls policy was not followed, the incident was not investigated, the resident was followed up immediately and for 72 hours following the incident. The Administrator said she was the abuse coordinator and she was responsible for reporting any allegations of abuse and neglect. She said neglect does not have to be done intentionally and when asked if failure to promptly identify Resident #238's fracture and leaving the resident in pain for 6 days was a form of neglect she said it was not because the injury resulted from a fall and was not an injury of unknown origin. When asked what action should have been taken on 08/03/23 when she was notified of the fall, the Administrator said the facility took appropriate action by sending the resident to the hospital. The Administrator said the quality department was made aware of the 6 day late unidentified fracture and they made the decision on how to handle the incident. She said the State Survey Agency was notified of the incident on 08/07/23 after the IJ was called. In an interview on 08/09/23 at 11:54 PM the VP of Ambulatory Care said that there is an incident reporting triage process. She said first the facility staff notify the Administrator/DON of the incident, who then notify the quality department. She said in corroboration with the quality and legal department the Administrator/designee reports the incident to the state. The VP of ambulatory services said she was only made aware of the incident involving Resident #238 after the IJ for radiology was called on 08/07/23 and that the Administrator did not report Resident #238's fall with fracture to the quality team. She said the Administrator was solely responsible for the failure to report the incident to the state. Record review of the facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation- Reporting and Investigating revised 09/2022 revealed, 1- if resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property or injury of unknown source is suspected, the suspicion must be reported immediately to the administrator and to other official according to state law. 2- The administrator or individual making the allegation immediately reports his or her suspicion to the following persons or agencies: a- the state licensing/certification agency responsible for surveying/licensing the facility. 3- Immediately is defined as: a- within two hours of an allegation involving abuse or result in serious bodily injury; or b- within 24 hours of an allegation that does not involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0625 (Tag F0625)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews the facility did not provide, in writing, a Bed-hold notice upon transfer at the time of ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews the facility did not provide, in writing, a Bed-hold notice upon transfer at the time of transfer of a resident to a hospital or for therapeutic leave, for 8 of 8 residents (Resident #237, Resident #238, Resident #242, Resident #243, Resident #244, Resident #245, Resident #246 and Resident #247) reviewed for transfers and discharge. The facility failed to provide bed-hold notifications to Resident #237, Resident #238, Resident #242, Resident #243, Resident #244, Resident #245, Resident #246 and Resident #247 representative when they were transferred to the hospital. This failure could place residents at risk of unsafe discharges and the facility's policies on bed holds. Findings included: Resident #237 Record review of Resident #237's Face Sheet dated 08/11/23 revealed, a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the on 07/26/23 with diagnoses which included: atrial fibrillation, Osteoporosis, type 2 diabetes and hypertension. The resident transferred to an acute care hospital on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #237's 5-day admission MDS dated [DATE] revealed, intact cognition as indicated by a BIMS score of 15 out of 15, supervision for most ADLs, occasionally incontinent of bladder and always continent of bowel. Record review of Resident #237's undated Care Plan revealed, focus- increased dependency on caregivers and limited functional mobility. Record review of Resident #237's Progress notes dated 08/05/23 revealed, resident discharged to the ER for evaluation and treatment on 08/05/23. There was no documentation of transfer or discharge plans or the bed hold policy. Record review of Resident #237's August 2023 EMR revealed no transfer or discharge plans documentation. Record review of Resident #237's paper/electronic chart revealed neither the resident nor their responsible party received notification of the facility's bed hold policy. Resident #238 Record review of Resident #238's Face Sheet dated 08/14/23 revealed, a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnose which included: fainting, unspecified fall, type 2 diabetes, constipation and backbone fracture with routine healing. The resident was transferred to an acute care hospital on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #238's 5- day admission MDS dated [DATE] revealed, intact cognition as indicated by a BIMS score of 15 out of 15, extensive assistance with most ADLs, use of a wheelchair/walker and frequently incontinent of both bladder and bowel. The MDS assessment was completed after the resident discharged . Record review of Resident #238's Discharge MDS dated [DATE] revealed the resident's return was anticipated post discharge, and it was an unplanned discharged with no evidence of an acute change in mental status. Record review of Resident #238's undated Care Plan revealed, focus- risk for injury/fall risk related to weakness, impaired balance/coordination and possible side effects of medications; goal- resident will remain free from injuries. Focus- alteration in comfort related to pian secondary to compression fracture and left hip pain, goal- administer pain medications as ordered. Record review of Resident #238's Progress Notes dated 08/03/23 revealed, Resident #238 was sent to the ER via transport for a fracture of the left femur. Record review of Resident #238's August 2023 EMR revealed no transfer or discharge plans documentation. Record review of Resident #238's paper/electronic chart revealed no notification of the facility's bed hold policy. In an interview on 08/15/23 at 03:09 PM, Family Member #2 said that Resident #238 was discharged to the hospital on [DATE]. He said he was not provided an explanation of the resident's rights to remain at the facility, the bed hold policy or any discharge planning. He said Resident #238's family was told she could not return to the facility from the hospital and the resident's items had to be picked up. Family Member #2 said he was just told the facility was not accepting any adminissions, with no additional information provided. Resident #242 Record review of Resident #242's Face Sheet dated 08/16/23 revealed, a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: anemia, fluid overload, hypertension, type 2 diabetes and end stage renal disease. The resident transferred to an acute care hospital on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #242's 5-day admission MDS dated [DATE] revealed, intact cognition as indicated by a BIMS score of 15 out of 15, extensive assistance with most ADLs, use of a wheelchair and frequently incontinent of both bladder and bowel. Record review of Resident #242's undated Care Plan revealed, focus- decline with ADLs, transfers and mobility due to recent medical course. Record review of Resident #242's Progress Notes dated 08/01/23 signed by the Social Worker revealed, resident's insurance last covered day was 08/23/23. Resident #242 did not want to return home alone and wanted to appeal his discharge on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #242's Progress Notes dated 08/02/23 revealed, resident discharged to the hospital on [DATE] due to SOB. Record review of Resident #242's August 2023 EMR revealed no transfer or discharge plans documentation. Record review of Resident #242's Paper/Electronic Chart revealed, neither the resident nor their responsible party received notification of the facility bed hold policy. Resident #243 Record review of Resident #243's Face Sheet dated 08/16/23 revealed, a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, iron deficiency anemia, type 2 diabetes, hypertension and acute kidney function. The resident discharged to an acute care hospital on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #243's admission MDS dated [DATE] revealed, intact cognition as indicated by a BIMS score of 15 out of 15, extensive assistance with most ADLs, use of a wheelchair, occasionally incontinent of bladder and frequently incontinent of bowel. Record review of Resident #243's undated Care Plan revealed, focus- exhibiting decline in ADL's and functional transfers. Record review of Resident #243's Progress Notes dated 08/05/23 revealed, resident was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] as a result of an inserted Foley Catheter with blood drainage, with complaints of pain and pressure to the penis. Record review of Resident #243's EMR revealed no transfer or discharge plans documentation. Record review of Resident #243's Paper/Electronic Chart revealed, neither the resident nor their responsible party received. Resident #244 Record review of Resident #244's Face Sheet dated 08/16/23 revealed, a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: UTI, nutritional anemia, immunodeficiency, high cholesterol, acute kidney disease and hypertension. The resident transferred to an acute care on 08/05/23 hospital. Record review of Resident #244's admission MDS dated [DATE] revealed, intact cognition as indicated by a BIMS score of 13 out of 15 and extensive assistance with most ADLs. Record review of Resident #244's undated Care Plan revealed, focus- resident is exhibiting decline in ADLs. Record review of Resident #244's Progress Notes dated 08/05/23 revealed, the resident was sent to the ER for evaluation following complaints of abdominal pains with nausea. Record review of Resident #244's EMR revealed, no transfer or discharge plans documentation. Record review of Resident #244's Paper/Electronic Chart revealed, neither the resident nor their responsible party received notification of the facility bed hold policy. Resident #245 Record review of Resident #245's Face Sheet dated 08/16/23 revealed, a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of: bacterial pneumonia, abdominal pain, stage 3 kidney disease and hypertension. The resident transferred to an acute care hospital on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #245's Baseline are Plan dated 07/31/23 revealed, initial discharge goals to return to own home, 2-person physical assist required for most ADLs and always incontinent of both bladder and bowel. Record review of Resident #245's Progress Notes dated 08/7/23 revealed, the resident was transferred to the ER for further evaluation due to AMS and lethargy. Record review of Resident #245's EMR revealed, no transfer or discharge plans documentation. Record review of Resident #245's Paper/Electronic Chart revealed, neither the resident nor their responsible party received notification of the facility bed hold policy. Resident #246 Record review of Resident #246's Face Sheet dated 08/16/23 revealed, a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: Parkinson's disease, high cholesterol, hypertension and fracture of the calf bone. The resident was transferred to an acute care hospital on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #246's Admissions MDS dated [DATE] revealed, intact cognition as indicated by a BIMS score of 14 out of 15, extensive assistance with most ADLs, and frequently incontinent of both bladder and bowel. Record review of Resident #246's undated Care Plan revealed, focus decrease in muscle strength, transfer, bed mobility balance and ambulation. Record review of Resident #246's Progress Notes dated 08/02/23 revealed, the resident was unable to walk due to a fracture and had surgery scheduled on 08/07/23. The location of the fracture or the surgical procedure to be performed was not documented. Record review of Resident #246's Progress Notes dated 08/06/23 revealed, the resident was informed about her surgery in the a.m. (08/07/23). There was no documentation about explanation of rights of delivery of bed-hold information. Record review of Resident #246's Progress Notes dated 08/07/23 revealed, resident was transferred to a hospital for her surgery. Record review of Resident #246's EMR revealed, no transfer or discharge plans documentation. Record review of Resident #246's Paper/Electronic Chart revealed, neither the resident nor their responsible party received notification of the facility bed hold policy. Resident #247 Record review of Resident #247's Face Sheet dated 08/16/23 revealed, a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: right arm fracture, atrial fibrillation, and cirrhosis of the liver. The resident was transferred to an acute care hospital on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #247's 5-day Entry MDS dated [DATE] revealed, the resident admitted from an acute hospital stay. Record review of Resident #247's Baseline Care Plan dated 07/27/23 revealed, the resident's initial discharge goals were to return home and required 1 person assist with most ADLs. Record review of Resident #247's Progress Notes dated 08/07/23 revealed, the resident was scheduled for surgery on 08/08/23 and all pre-operation orders were given to the incoming nurse. There was no documented delivery of the facility bed hold policy, transfer instructions or discharge instructions. Record review of Resident #247's Progress Notes dated 08/08/23 revealed, the resident was transferred to the hospital for surgical repair of a right arm fracture. Record review of Resident #247's EMR revealed, no transfer or discharge plans. Record review of Resident #247's Paper/Electronic Chart revealed, neither the resident nor their responsible party received notification of the facility bed hold policy. In an interview on 08/16/23 at 09:30 AM, the Administrator said the Social Worker is responsible for discharge planning. She said residents that are sent to the hospital for acute care have the right to return to the facility. The Administrator said most hospital transfers are acute/emergency situations so a bed hold notice is not always provided. After reviewing the resident admission packet, the Administrator said the Bed hold policy was not provided to the residents at admission. In an interview on 08/16/23 at 09:44 AM, the Social Worker said that she was responsible for the resident discharge process. She said when a resident is transferred to the hospital they have the right to return but she was not aware of the requirement to present the residents with a bed hold policy. She said due to the SA's ongoing investigations the facility management placed a hold on all admissions and readmissions. She said Resident s#237, #238, #242, #243, #244, #245, #246 and #247 were not allowed to return to the facility following hospitalization and to her knowledge none of the residents were provided a bed hold policy or explained their rights to return to the facility. Record review of the facility policy titled Bed Holds and Returns revised March 2017 revealed, prior to transfers and therapeutic leaves, residents or resident representatives will be informed in writing of the bed-hold and return policy. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 1- Residents may return to and resume residence in the facility after hospitalization or therapeutic leave as outlined in the policy; 3- prior to a transfer, written information will be given to the resident and the resident representatives that explain in detail: a- the rights and limitation of the resident regarding bed holds; b- the reserve bed payment policy as indicated by the state plan; c= the facility per diem rate required to hold a bed (non-Medicaid residents), or to hold a bed beyond the state bed-hold period (Medicaid residents); and the details of the transfer (per the notice of transfer). 6- If the resident is transferred with the expectation that he or she will return, but it is determined that the resident cannot return , that resident will be formally discharged . 7- The resident will be permitted to return to available bed in the location of the facility that her or she previously resided.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Transfer (Tag F0626)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow a written policy on permitting residents to return to the fa...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow a written policy on permitting residents to return to the facility after they are hospitalized or placed on therapeutic leave for 7 of 8 residents (Resident #237, Resident #238, Resident #242, Resident #243, Resident #244, Resident #245, and Resident #246 ) reviewed for discharge. The facility failed to allow Resident #237, Resident #238, Resident #242, Resident #243, Resident #244, Resident #245 and Resident #246 to return to the facility after they were transferred to the hospital. This failure could place residents at risk for an inappropriate discharge and cause a disruption in their care and services and potential decline in health. Finding included: Resident #237 Record review of Resident #237's Face Sheet dated 08/11/23 revealed, a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the on 07/26/23 with diagnoses which included: atrial fibrillation, Osteoporosis, type 2 diabetes and hypertension. The resident transferred on 08/05/23 to an acute care hospital. Record review of Resident #237's 5-day admission MDS dated [DATE] revealed, intact cognition as indicated by a BIMS score of 15 out of 15, supervision for most ADLs, occasionally incontinent of bladder and always continent of bowel. Record review of Resident #237's undated Care Plan revealed, focus- increased dependency on caregivers and limited functional mobility. Record review of Resident #237's Progress notes dated 08/05/23 revealed, resident discharged to the ER for evaluation and treatment on 08/05/23. There is no documentation of documentation of transfer or discharge plans/documentation. Resident #238 Record review of Resident #238's Face Sheet dated 08/14/23 revealed, a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnose which included: fainting, unspecified fall, type 2 diabetes, constipation and backbone fracture with routine healing. The resident t transferred on 08/03/23 to an acute care hospital. Record review of Resident #238's 5- day admission MDS dated [DATE] revealed, intact cognition as indicated by a BIMS score of 15 out of 15, extensive assistance with most ADLs, use of a wheelchair/walker and frequently incontinent of both bladder and bowel. The MDS assessment was completed after the resident discharged . Record review of Resident #238's Discharge MDS dated [DATE] revealed, the resident's return was anticipated post discharge, it was an unplanned discharged and there was no evidence of an acute change in mental status. Record review of Resident #238's undated Care Plan revealed, focus- risk for injury/fall risk related to weakness, impaired balance/coordination and possible side effects of medications; goal- resident will remain free from injuries. Focus- alteration in comfort related to pian secondary to compression fracture and left hip pain, goal- administer pain medications as ordered. Record review of CarePort communication between the admission Coordinator and the hospital regarding Resident #238 starting 08/04/23 revealed, on 08/04/23 at 11:04 AM the Admissions Coordinator wrote Per Administration, we will not be able to accept the pt back to the facility. When asked why not by the case manager the Admission's Coordinator wrote Administration will not allow any admissions, including hospital returns in the building until further notice. They said admission hold on 08/07/23 at 02:39 PM. Record review of Resident #238's Progress Notes dated 08/03/23 revealed, Resident #238 was sent to the ER via transport for a fracture of the left femur. In an interview on 08/15/23 at 03:09 PM, Family Member #2 said that Resident #238 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE]. He said he was not provided an explanation of the resident's rights to remain at the facility, the bed hold policy or any discharge planning. He said when Resident #238 was in the hospital and ready for discharge the family was told she could not return to the facility because the facility had placed a hold on all admissions and the resident's items had to be picked up. Resident #242 Record review of Resident #242's Face Sheet dated 08/16/23 revealed, a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: anemia, fluid overload, hypertension, type 2 diabetes and end stage renal disease. The resident transferred on 08/02/23 to an acute care hospital. Record review of Resident #242's 5-day admission MDS dated [DATE] revealed, intact cognition as indicated by a BIMS score of 15 out of 15, extensive assistance with most ADLs, use of a wheelchair and frequently incontinent of both bladder and bowel. Record review of Resident #242's undated Care Plan revealed, focus- decline with ADLs, transfers and mobility due to recent medical course. Record review of Resident #242's Progress Notes dated 08/01/23 signed by the Social Worker revealed, resident's insurance last covered day was 08/23/23. Resident #242 did not want to return home alone and wanted to appeal his discharge on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #242's Progress Notes dated 08/02/23 revealed, resident discharged to the hospital on [DATE] due to SOB. Record review of CarePort communication between the admission Coordinator and the hospital regarding Resident #242 starting 08/03/23 revealed, on 08/07/23 at 11:04 AM the Admissions Coordinator wrote Per Administration, we will not be able to accept this pt back to the facility. I do apologize. On 08/11/23 at 06:49 AM the Hospital Case Manager wrote I know you cannot accept him back, but is there any way we can requests his effects and belongings. Resident #243 Record review of Resident #243's Face Sheet dated 08/16/23 revealed, a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, iron deficiency anemia, type 2 diabetes, hypertension and acute kidney function. The resident discharged on 08/05/23 to an acute care hospital. Record review of Resident #243's admission MDS dated [DATE] revealed, intact cognition as indicated by a BIMS score of 15 out of 15, extensive assistance with most ADLs, use of a wheelchair, occasionally incontinent of bladder and frequently incontinent of bowel. Record review of Resident #243's undated Care Plan revealed, focus- exhibiting decline in ADL's and functional transfers. Record review of Resident #243's Progress Notes dated 08/05/23 revealed, resident was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] as a result of an inserted Foley Catheter with blood drainage, with complaints of pain and pressure to the penis. Record review of CarePort communication between the admission Coordinator and the hospital regarding Resident #243 starting 08/07/23 revealed, on 08/07/23 at 11:07 AM the Admissions Coordinator wrote Per Administration, we will not be able to accept the pt back to the facility. Resident #244 Record review of Resident #244's Face Sheet dated 08/16/23 revealed, a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: UTI, nutritional anemia, immunodeficiency, high cholesterol, acute kidney disease and hypertension. The resident transferred on 08/05/23 to an acute care hospital. Record review of Resident #244's undated Care Plan revealed, focus- resident is exhibiting decline in ADLs. Record review of Resident #244's admission MDS dated [DATE] revealed, intact cognition as indicated by a BIMS score of 13 out of 15 and extensive assistance with most ADLs. Record review of Resident #244's Progress Notes dated 08/05/23 revealed, resident was sent to the ER for evaluation following complaints of abdominal pains with nausea. Record review of CarePort communication between the admission Coordinator and the hospital regarding Resident #244 starting 08/07/23 revealed, on 08/07/23 at 11:11 AM the Admissions Coordinator wrote Per Administration, we will not be able to accept the pt back to the facility. When asked did they say why by the Case Manager the Admission's Coordinator wrote They gave us an admission hold due to investigations on 08/07/23 at 11:18 AM. Resident #245 Record review of Resident #245's Face Sheet dated 08/16/23 revealed, a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of: bacterial pneumonia, abdominal pain, stage 3 kidney disease and hypertension. The resident transferred on 08/07/23 to an acute care hospital. Record review of Resident #245's Baseline Care Plan dated 07/31/23 revealed, initial discharge goals to return to own home, 2 person physical assist required for most ADLs and always incontinent of both bladder and bowel. Record review of Resident #245's Progress Notes dated 08/7/23 revealed, the resident was transferred to the ER for further evaluation due to AMS and lethargy. Resident #246 Record review of Resident #246's Face Sheet dated 08/16/23 revealed, a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: Parkinson's disease, high cholesterol, hypertension and fracture of the calf bone. The resident was transferred to an acute care hospital on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #246's Admissions MDS dated [DATE] revealed, intact cognition as indicated by a BIMS score of 14 out of 15, extensive assistance with most ADLs, and frequently incontinent of both bladder and bowel. Record review of Resident #246's undated Care Plan revealed, focus decrease in muscle strength, transfer, bed mobility balance and ambulation. Record review of Resident #246's Progress Notes dated 08/02/23 revealed, resident was unable to walk due to a fracture and had surgery scheduled on 08/07/23. The location of the fracture or the surgical procedure to be performed were not documented. Record review of Resident #246's Progress Notes dated 08/06/23 revealed, resident was informed about her surgery in the a.m. (08/07/23). There is no documentation about explanation of rights of delivery of bed-hold information. Record review of Resident #246's Progress Notes dated 08/07/23 revealed, resident was transferred to a hospital for her surgery. Record review of CarePort communication between the admission Coordinator and the hospital regarding Resident #246 starting 08/07/23 revealed, on 08/07/23 at 12:24 PM the Admission's Coordinator wrote Per Administration, we will not be able to accept the pt back to the facility. On 08/07/23 at 12:23 PM, the Admission's Coordinator wrote Administration will not allow any admissions, including hospital returns in the building until further notice. In an interview on 08/15/23 at 12:10 PM, the Social Worker said Resident #238's family member called back on 08/08/23 and wanted the resident to readmit following her acute hospital stay. She said she apologized to the family and informed them that the facility was not accepting readmissions. The Social Worker said she did not help the family find placement in a new facility, and that would be done by the hospital case manager. The Social worker said she did not issue a discharge letter because she was not instructed to. In an interview on 08/16/23 at 09:30 AM, the Administrator said all residents that are transferred to the hospital for acute care have the right to return as long the facility was still able to meet their needs. She said that due to the SA's pending investigations deeming the residents to be in IJ starting on 08/01/23 the facility management team decided to not allow any admissions or readmissions. The Administrator said due to the management's decision residents who discharged to the hospital were not allowed to return to the facility. She said she attempted to find a facility that would take all the hospitalized residents, but she was unsuccessful. The Administrator said that to her knowledge the residents were not provided any documentation of their rights and once they were in the hospital, facility staff followed management's instructions to not allow any admissions or readmissions. In an interview on 08/16/23 at 09:30 AM, the Administrator said the Social Worker is responsible for discharge planning. She said residents that are sent to the hospital for acute care have the right to return to the facility. The Administrator said there was no real risk to the patient as a result of the facility refusing readmission because the residents were in the hospital receiving care, and the hospital would help the residents get appropriate placement. In an interview on 08/16/23 at 09:44 AM, the Social Worker said she was provided specific instructions from management that there was a hold on admissions due to the SA's pending investigations. She said that there were at least 7 residents that were transferred to the hospital starting 08/01/23 that were not allowed to return to the facility. She said when residents were transferred to the hospital the facility reassesses the residents to ensure they are appropriate to return but that didn't occur in this situation. She said due to the SA's ongoing investigations the facility management placed a hold on all admissions and readmissions. She said Resident s#237, #238, #242, #243, #244, #245, #246 and #247 were not allowed to return to the facility following hospitalization. In an interview on 08/16/23 at 10:23 AM, the Admission's Coordinator said she assists the Social Worker with discharge planning. She said when a resident is transferred to the hospital, she communicates with the hospital case manager through a messaging portal. The Admission's Coordinator said when a resident is ready to discharge the case manager will contact the facility through the portal and after review has determined that the facility can meet the needs of the resident, the resident is transferred back to the facility. She said she was notified by facility management that all residents who transferred to the hospital for acute care on and after 08/01/23 were not allowed to return to the facility. She said the residents were not provided a 30-day discharge letter and the ombudsman was not notified of their discharge. In an interview on 08/16/23 the VP of Ambulatory Services said the facility management as well as the legal department decided not to re-admit residents who were transferred to the hospital for acute care to the facility for safety reasons. Record review of the facility policy titled Transfer or Discharge, Emergency revised 12/2016 revealed, emergency transfers or discharges may be necessary to protect the health and/or wellbeing of the resident(s). 1- Residents will not be transferred unless: a- the transfer or discharge is necessary for the resident's welfare and the resident's needs cannot be met in the facility; b- the transfer or discharge is appropriate because the resident's health has improved sufficiently so the resident no longer needs the services provided by the facility; c- the safety of individuals in the facility in endangered due to the facility or behavioral status of the resident; d- the health of individuals in the facility would otherwise be endangered; e- the resident has failed, after reasonable and appropriate notice to pay for( or have paid under Medicare or Medicaid) a stay at the facility; f-the facility ceases to operate. Record review of the facility policy titled Transfer or Discharge Notice revised 12/2016 revealed, our facility shall provide a resident and/or the resident's representative (sponsor) with a thirty (30)-day written notice if an impeding transfer or discharge. 3- the resident and/or representative (sponsor) will be notified in writing of the following information; a- the reason for the transfer or discharge; b- the effective date of the transfer or discharge; c- the location to which the resident is being transferred; d- a statement of the resident's rights to appeal the transfer or discharge; e- the facility bed-hold policy; f- the name, address, and telephone number of the office of the state long-term care ombudsman; the name, address, email and telephone number of the agency responsible for the protection and advocacy of residents with intellectual and developmental(or related) disabilities (as applies) . 4- a copy of the notice will be sent to the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman. 5- The reasons for the transfer or discharge will be documented in the resident's medical record.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Unnecessary Medications (Tag F0759)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that the medication error rate was not five per...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that the medication error rate was not five percent or greater. The facility had a medication error rate of 9 % based on 3 errors out of 32 opportunities, which involved 3 of 8 residents (Resident #83, Resident #234 and Resident #235) reviewed for medication errors. - RN B failed to administer medications as ordered to Resident #83 as by applying Lidocaine 4% patch to the resident's right knee instead of the back. - RN A failed to administer medications as ordered to Resident #234 as ordered by crushing Cinacalcet (used in treatment for CKD) a medication that should not be crushed. - RN A failed to administer medications as ordered to Resident #235 by administering Morphine 15 mg ER (Extended release medication for pain) without clarification when the order read Morphine 15 mg IR (mmediate release) These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving the desired therapeutic effect of their medications and uncontrolled pain. Resident #83 Record review of Resident #83's Face Sheet dated 06/28/23 revealed, a [AGE] year-old female that admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: multiple fractures of ribs and fracture of the left clavicle. Record review of Resident #83's undated Care Plan revealed, focus- limited bed mobility and transfer abilities. Focus- self-care deficit related to inability to perform ADLs independently Record review of Resident #83's Order Summary Report dated 06/28/23 at 10:12 AM revealed, Lidocaine 4% Patch- apply 3 patches to back topically in the morning for pain. An observation on 06/28/23 at 07:57 AM revealed, RN B preparing medication for administration to Resident #83. She retrieved 1 patch of Lidocaine 4% and 4 oral medications and entered into the Resident #83's Room. After administering the oral medications RN B asked Resident #83 where the resident wanted the patch applied and Resident #83 said her right knee. RN B applied 1 patch to Resident #3's right knee and then exited the room after gathering her supplies and performing hand hygiene. In an interview on 06/28/23 at 10:10 AM, RN B said prior to administering medication to residents nursing staff are expected to check the medication to be administered against the order verifying the strength, formulation, and route of administration. She said she applied Resident #83's Lidocaine Patch to her right knee even though the order said to the back because Lidocaine Patches can be applied to the location requested by the resident. She said that nursing staff do not have to apply the patch exclusively to the location listed on the physician order as long as the site of application was documented in the MAR. Resident #234 Record review of Resident #234's Face Sheet dated 06/28/23 revealed, an [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: chronic levels of serum enzymes, and chronic kidney disease. Record review of Resident #234's undated Care Plan revealed, focus- difficulty swallowing food. Record review of Resident #234's Order Summary Report dated 06/28/23 revealed: - May crush meds ordered on 06/16/23. - Cinacalcet 30 mg- give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day related to CKD ordered on 06/16/23 with a start date of 06/17/23. An observation on 06/28/23 at 08:30 AM revealed, RN A preparing for administration of medication to Resident #234. She retrieved 1 tablet of Cinacalcet, 3 other tablets as well as 1 capsule and placed them into individual medicine cups. RN A crushed each tablet and open emptied the contents of the capsule returning them to their individual medicine cups, mixed each medication with a spoon of pudding and entered into Resident #234's room. She then administered all 5 medications to Resident #235. An observation an interview on 06/28/23 at 10:27 AM revealed, Resident #234's blister pack of Cinacalcet with pharmacy instructions of swallow whole- don't chew/crush. RN A said prior to medication administration nursing staff must verify the medication against the MAR for the right dose, right time. She said medications that are EC or ER cannot be crushed as well as any medication that said do not crush on the pharmacy label. RN B said she did not notice that the pharmacy label for Resident #234's Cinacalcet said do not crush. She said since the medication could not be crushed she should have contacted the pharmacy to see if a liquid formulation was available because crushing medication that should not be crushed placed residents at risk for not getting the desired dose of their medications. Resident #235 Record review of Resident #235's face sheet dated 06/28/23 revealed, a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: acute kidney failure, UTI and unspecified fall. Record review of Resident #235's secondary Face Sheet dated 06/28/23 at 10:28 AM revealed, Resident #235 admitted to the facility on [DATE] at 09:01 PM. Record review of Resident #235's Baseline Care Plan dated 06/27/23 revealed, the resident was alert & oriented generalized aching pain Record review of Resident #235's Hospital Discharge Record dated 06/27/23 at 03:45 PM revealed, Resident #235 last the next scheduled dose of pain medications as follows: - Morphine 15 mg ER- 1 tablet be mouth every six hours with next dose due on 06/27/23 at 09:00 PM. Record review of Resident #235's Order Summary Report dated 06/28/23 revealed, - Morphine Sulfate 15 mg (IR)- give 1 tablet by mouth every 12 hours for pain ordered on 06/27/23 with a start date of 06/28/23. An observation on 06/28/23 at 08:45 AM revealed, Resident #235's family member approaching RN B while she prepared for medication administration to Resident #235. Resident #235's family member then handed RN B 2 bottles of medication (Morphine ER 15 mg and Oxycodone 10 mg) and said he brought only a 2 days' supply to cover Resident #235 until the medication arrived at the facility. After Resident #235's family member entered the resident's room, RN B alerted the Interim DON to the arrival of the mediation at which point they both counted the medications and logged them into individual control sheets. An observation on 06/28/23 at 09:00 AM revealed, RN B preparing for medication administration to Resident #235. She retrieved 1 tablet of Morphine 15 mg (IR) as well as 3 solid form medications, entered into the resident's room and administered the medications at 09:05 AM. In an interview on 06/28/23 at 10:10 AM, RN B said prior to administering medication to residents nursing staff are expected to check the medication to be administered against the order verifying the strength, formulation, and route of administration. RN B said she did not notice that Resident #235's orders said Morphine 15 mg (IR) and not Morphine ER 15 mg that she administered. She should have checked the formulation and got clarification from Resident #235's MD prior to administration because ER and IR medications are absorbed differently same in the body. RN B said ER medications are released slowly over time while IR release immediately so failure to administer medications as ordered by giving Morphine ER instead of IR could place residents at risk for delayed pain control and uncontrolled pain. In an interview on 06/28/23 at 10:35 AM, the Interim DON said prior to administering medications nursing staff are expected to introduce themselves to the resident then check the medication against the order verifying the strength, route, time, formulation and pharmacy specific directions. She said medications should be administered as ordered and if any discrepancies are identified the nurse is expected to stop and get clarification from the prescriber or the medical records prior to administering the medication. The Interim DON said patches must be applied to the site specified in the order and that nursing staff can not apply them to sites requested by the resident if it contradicts the order. She said medications with directions of do not crush should not be crushed because doing so could impact the absorption of the medication into the body and that ER and IR medications were not the same because of their absorption into the body. The Interim DON said failure to administer medications as ordered could place residents at risk for not receiving the desired therapeutic effect, uncontrolled diseases states and pain. Record review of the facility policy titled 'Administering Medications' with no revision date revealed, 2- Medications must be administered with the orders, including any required time frame. 3- If a dosage is believed to be inappropriate or excessive for a resident . the person preparing or administering the medication shall contact the resident's attending physician or the facility's medical director to discuss the concerns. 6- The individual administering the medication must check the label three (3) times to verify the right medication, right dosage, right time and right method (route) of administration before giving the medication.
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety in the facility's only k...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety in the facility's only kitchen. Items in freezer #1 were not labeled identify items and dated with opened/use by dates. Items in freezer #2 were not labeled identify and dated with open. Walker-in freezer had 2 gallons cultured baking butter milk expired -The deep fryer in the kitchen had dry food particles and dirty dark brown grease in it Toasters with dry crumbs and dark in color. These failures placed residents that eat food from the kitchen at risk for foodborne illnesses. Findings included: During an observation and interview on 06/27/2023 beginning at 9:23 AM of the kitchen with Dietary services manager (DM) revealed: Freezer #1: One large plastic bag ( 5Ib=pounds)open that DM identified as Hush puppies, not labeled to identify item, and no date. One large plastic bag( 10Ib=pounds) that DM identified as chicken tenders, not labeled to identify item, and with no date. 5 large plastic bags (3Ib= pounds each) that DM identified as hush brown, not labeled to identify item, and no date One large plastic bags ( 5Ib =pounds) that DM identified as chicken patties, not labeled to identify item, and with no date. One large plastic bag( 10Ib =pounds) that DM identified as beef patties, not labeled to identify item, and with no date 2 large plastic bags ( 5Ibs=pounds each) that DM identified as Black bean burger, not labeled to identify item, and with no date. -The deep fryer in the kitchen had dry food particles and dirty dark brown grease in it. Freezer #2 by the oven 3 large plastic bags ( 3Ibs= pounds each) that DM identified as Sausages patties, not labeled to identify item, and with no date. 1 large plastic bag ( 10Ib = pound) that DM identified as shredded cheese not labeled to identify item, and with no date. 2 large plastic bags (3Ibs = pounds each) that DM identified as Turkey patties, not labeled to identify item, and with no date. Observation at 9:35 AM revealed Conveyor toaster in the serving area with brown stain and dark large crumbs. Interview with the DM on 6/27/23 at 9:40 AM regarding the food opened not labeled nor dated, he said he was off duty for 2 days and he would be talking to the staff that worked at night and he said the staffs were taught to always date and name food items when taken out of original container. DM said he would be in servicing the staffs on labeling and dating food taken out original container. DM said the deep fryer oil was changed every 3 days by a contract company and was last changed the oil on 6/24/23 and he was going to check for the receipt for the deep fryer from the contacted company. DM said for the toaster he would ask staffs to cleaned it more often and will start keeping cleaning log. Observation on 6/28/23 at 10:30 AM of walker in freezer had 2 half gallons of cultured baking butter milk 1% low fat vitamin A&D best used (best used on 6/19/23 ). Interview with DM on 6/28/23 at 10:30 AM during rounds he removed cultured baking butter 2 half gallons and discarded, DM said he was responsible for checking the milk products, but he missed it this time. Observation on 6/28/23 at 10:35 AM, revealed Freezer #2, had 5 large plastic bags of hash brown in the freezer with no name and date. Interview with DM on 6/28/23 at 10:45 AM, he said he was not aware that 5 large plastic bags of hash brown were out of origin box, and it was not dated or labeled. DM said he was going to take care of it. On 6/28/23 at 11:40 AM. DM said he did not realize that it was out of original container. Interview with DM on 6/29/23 at 11:14 AM about his expectation is for labeling, dating food. DM said the chef were expected to date and labeled food open and he did talk to the chef that worked when those food items were opened and he was very sorry, he further stated that not dating or labeling could cause food contaminated and cause food borne disease. DM said the staffs had in-services and he did not have previous in-services; it was with the Administrator. Interview with Administrator on 6/29/23 at 11:59 AM regarding her expectation, she said the kitchen staffs were to follow the policy and procedure for food labeling and dating. she did not have the in services except for the in-service that was done on 6/28/23, she was not directly in charge of the in services when it was done she said she will check with the dietary manager when in-services was done prior to the 6/28/23. None was presented before exit on 6/29/23. Record Review of Facility Policy Labeling and Record Keeping 5.3 Dating and Labeling of Food In Production, dated 10/01/2022 revealed: All foods opened, prepared and used in the unit must be dated and labeled. Date marks are important for all TCS foods because while growth of bacteria in refrigerated foods is largely controlled by temperature., it is not stopped altogether . Date marks indicate when foods have been in refrigeration too long and have reached unsafe levels of bacterial growth. Common name labeling is also important since certain foods can be difficult to identify once they are processed or removed from their original package. Standard : All foods, including prepared items, bulk foods and ingredients present in a compass group must be labeled at all times. TCS foods requiring a date mark shall be labeled with the common name, preparation date, discard and associate initials . Record Review of United States Food and Drug Administration (USFDA) accessed https://www.fda.gov/media/127796/download at on 03/31/2022 revealed: Section 3-501.17 specifies ready-to-eat, time/temperature control for safety (TCS) food prepared in a food establishment and held longer than a 24 hour period shall be marked to indicate the date or day by which the food is to be consumed on the premises, sold, or discarded when held at a temperature of 5°C (41°F) or less for a maximum of 7 days. These time/temperature parameters are intended to help control for growth of Listeria monocytogenes.
May 2022 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Unnecessary Medications (Tag F0759)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the medication error rate was not five pe...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the medication error rate was not five percent (5%) or greater. The facility had a medication error rate of 11%, based on three errors out of 26 opportunities, which involved 1 of 6 residents (Resident #105); and 1 of 4 staff (RN A) reviewed for medication errors. RN A crushed Enteric Coated Aspirin 81 mg, a medication that should not be crushed, and administered it to Resident #105. RN A failed to administer Entresto 24-26 mg, a medication used to treat heart failure and Sildenafil 20 mg, a medication to treat PAH ( a condition that increases blood pressure in the blood vessel that brings blood from the heart to the lungs) to Resident #105 Findings Include Record review of Resident #105's face sheet dated 05/10/22 revealed, a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: hypertension, pulmonary embolism (blood clot in the lungs) and heart failure. Record review of Resident #105's Entry MDS dated [DATE] revealed, resident entered from an acute hospital stay. Record review of Resident #105's Baseline Care Plan Dated 04/28/22 revealed, the resident was alert and forgetful, vision impaired, with initial admission goals of: return to prior living arrangement and improve medical condition. She needed limited assistance with most activities of daily living, ambulated with a wheelchair, had an indwelling catheter and was frequently incontinent of bowel. Record review of Resident #105's Comprehensive Care Plan initiated 04/28/22 revealed, Focus- resident exhibits decrease in muscle strength, transfer, bed mobility, balance and ambulation and decline with ADLs due to recent medical course. An observation on 05/10/22 at 09:30 AM revealed, RN A prepared medication for administration to Resident #105. She entered into the resident's room and checked her blood pressure which read as SBP 107, DBP 66 with a pulse of 87. RN A retrieved 1 tablet of 81 mg Enteric Coated Aspirin, four other tablets and 1 caplet medication and placed them in individual medication cups. She crushed all 5 tablets including the Aspirin, mixed them with pudding and at 09:35 AM she re-entered Resident #105's room, administered the crushed pills mixed in pudding and the Intact caplet. RN A returned to her computer and documented the 5 medications she administered and that 1 tablet Entresto 24-26 mg and 1 Tablet of Sildenafil 20 mg were not administered to Resident #105 because her blood pressure was outside of parameters. Record review of Resident #105's physician orders dated 04/28/22 revealed, Aspirin EC Tablet Delayed Release 81 mg, give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day; Entresto Tablet 24-26 mg, give 1 tablet by mouth every 12 hours; Sildenafil Citrate Tablet 100 mg, give 1 tablet by mouth three times a day. There were no parameters instructing nursing staff to hold Resident #105's Entresto and Sildenafil due to blood pressure. In an interview on 05/10/22 at 09:49 AM, RN A said that Enteric Coated Aspirin should not be crushed because crushing the medication changes how it is absorbed in the resident's system. She said she should have used chewable Aspirin 81 mg instead because by administering crushed EC Aspirin, the resident may not get a sufficient dose of the medication and it might not be effective. In an interview on 05/10/22 at 02:05 PM , the DON said prior to administering medications nursing staff must verify medications against the resident's order in the EMR and verify that the resident is within parameters such as blood pressure prior to administration. She said that medications should only be held per the physicians orders and if nursing staff is unsure if they should hold or administer a particular medication they should contact the MD or DON for further clarification. She said that medication should not be held for low blood pressure if there are no blood pressure parameters associated to the medication order. The DON said that holding medication outside of the MD's specified parameters could result in delayed treatment. She said that Delayed release and enteric coated medications should not be crushed because the coating on these medications cause variable patterns of release and that crushing the medication disrupts the release pattern. The DON said that administering inappropriately crushed medication can lead to inappropriate dosing. Record review of RN A's competency assessment titled Medication Administration Observation Report dated 10/22/21 revealed techniques observed: 5- For meds with parameters, vital signs are taken prior to admin- competency met. 9- proper crushing technique, non-crushable meds have MD. Order. Do not crush information is available, competency n/a. Record review of the facility policy titled Administering Medications revised October 2014 revealed, 11- The following information is checked/verified for each resident prior to administering medications: a- allergies to medications; and b- vital signs if necessary. Record review of the facility policy titled Medication Orders and Administration revised 09/02/15 revealed, prior to administering any medication, the nurse verifies the following information based on the medication order and product label: correct medication and strength, correct dose, correct time, correct route, correct frequency, correct patient, and expiration date of the medication.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility were...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, included the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, the expiration date when applicable and stored all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments and under proper temperature controls, and permitted only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for 3 of 3 medication carts (1st Floor Front Medication Cart, 2nd Floor Front Medication Cart, 2nd Floor Back Medication Cart) and 2 of 2 Treatment Carts (1st Floor Treatment Cart and 2nd Floor Treatment Cart) reviewed for medication storage. 1. The facility failed to ensure the 1st and 2nd Floor Treatment Carts were locked when unattended and not in use. 2. The facility failed to ensure the 1st Floor Front Medication Cart did not contain expired protein supplements, bulk multi-dose containers without open dates and expired insulin. 3. The facility failed to ensure that medications were not left unattended in resident room [ROOM NUMBER]. 4. The facility failed to ensure the 2nd Floor Front Medication Cart did not contain medications stored outside of manufacturer specified temperature ranges, Insulin Pens with no open date, Medications without patient identifiers, and bulk multi-dose containers without open dates. 5. The facility failed to ensure the 2nd Floor Back Medication Cart did not contain Insulin without open dates, bulk multi-dose containers without open dates, expired medications and medications stored out of manufacturer specified temperatures. Findings Include: 1. An observation on 05/10/22 at 08:23 AM revealed, the 1st floor Treatment Cart unattended and unlocked against the wall on the side of the nursing station, the drawers contained topical medications and treatment supplies. In an interview on 05/10/22 at 08:35 AM, LVN A said all Medication Carts are to be locked when not in use and unattended. She said the treatment cart was accessible to all floor nurses and was their responsibility to make sure the cart was locked at all times. LVN A said that Medication Carts should be locked to make sure medications were not accessible to residents for their safety. In an observation and interview on 05/10/22 at 08:25 AM with RN A revealed the 2nd Floor Treatment Cart unattended and unlocked against the wall across from the nursing station. The 1st drawer of the cart contained resident specific prescription only topical medications while the other drawers contained treatment supplies. RN A said that all Medication Carts should be secured/locked when not in use and that all floor nurses who had keys to the cart were responsible for ensuring the treatment cart was locked in order to prevent access by patients. She said unlocked and unattended treatment carts placed residents at risk of consumption of medications resulting in adverse reactions. 2. In an observation and interview on 05/10/22 at 10:43 AM, inventory of the 1st Floor Front Medication Cart with LVN A revealed: - An in use Levemir Insulin Pen with no open date - An open bottle of Active Protein, a protein supplement, with manufacturer's instructions of 3-month shelf life from date opened with no open date - An open and expired bottle of Active Protein with An open date of 09/29/21, with manufacturer's instructions of 3-month shelf life from date opened (12/29/21) - An open and in use bottle of Med Pass 2.0, a nutritional supplement with manufacturer instructions of Refrigerate after opening and discard after 4 days at room temperature with no open date. LVN A said nursing staff are expected to check medication carts for expired and inappropriately labeled medications on each shift as used and carts were also audited by pharmacy representatives. She said multi dose bulk bottles and insulin pens should be dated when opened in order to track their beyond use days. LVN A said multi-dose containers with no open dates cannot be used because they could be expired and all medications should be discarded once they pass their beyond use dates. She said she was unaware of the 3-month shelf life of the protein supplement and the nutritional supplement storage requirements and since they lacked sufficient labeling or were expired those supplements could no longer be used. LVN A said that since the insulin pen was not labeled with an open date it could not be used since it could be expired. She said once insulin expires it loses its potency and the therapeutic effect becomes unpredictable so it should be discarded in the sharp's container. LVN A said that the protein and nutritional supplement should be discarded in the trash because of administration of expired supplements places residents at risk for adverse reactions like GI issues. 3. An observation of resident room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed 2 prefilled syringes in sealed plastic wraps on top of the resident dresser. 1 prefilled syringe contained a 30 units of Heparin Lock while the other contained a saline flush. In an interview on 05/10/22 at 02:05 PM, the DON said that all medications should be locked in Medication Carts with access limited to staff administering medications and medications unattended in resident rooms, placed residents at risk of adverse reactions if medications are ingested. 1st Floor Front Medication Cart 2nd Floor Front Medication Cart In an observation and interview on 05/10/22 at 10:57 AM, inventory of the 2nd Floor Front Medication Cart with LVN B revealed: - An open bottle of Acidophilus, a probiotic, at room temperature in the drawer with manufacturer instructions of Refrigerate After Opening. - An open and in-use Levemir Insulin Pen with no open date - 2 open and in-use Insulin Glargine pens with no open date - 5 open and in-use Insulin Aspart pens with no open date - An open and in-use Tresiba FlexTouch Insulin pen with no open date - An open and in-use Humulin N Insulin pen with no open date - An open and in-use Budesonide and Formoterol 80/4.5 oral inhaler with no resident identifiers - 2 open and in-use bottles of Nitroglycerin 0.4 mg sublingual pills with no patient Identifiers - An open bottle of Active Protein with manufacturer's instructions of 3-month shelf life from date opened at room temperature with no open date LVN B said that this was his first day working on the 2nd Floor so he did not know why the cart contained inappropriately labeled multi-dose containers and resident medications. He said Medication Carts should be check for inappropriately labeled and stored medications on each shift. LVN B said that he did not know the bottle of Acidophilus had to be refrigerated and all medications that require refrigeration should be stored in the refrigerator. He said since it was not refrigerated it could not be used because if acidophilus is stored at room temperature it loses its potency and placed residents at risk of ineffective/insufficient therapy if administered. LVN B said that all insulin pens must be labeled with a date once open or taken out of the refrigerator. He said the purpose of recording the date is to track the expiration date of the insulin pen and since there were no open dates were considered expired. LVN B said when insulin expires it loses its potency and could potentially be contaminated. He said administration of expired insulin places residents at risk of adverse reactions and insufficient therapy. LVN B said all medications must have patient identifiers and since the bottles of nitroglycerin and the Budesonide/Formoterol inhaler had no patient identifiers that could no longer be used because unlabeled medications place residents at risk of medication errors if the given to the wrong resident. LVN B said that since the liquid protein had no open date it could be expired so it could no longer be used and should be discarded. He said administration of expired liquid protein could place residents at risk of upset stomach if administered. LVN B said the insulin pens should be reordered from the pharmacy and discarded in the sharps containers, the liquid protein should be thrown in the trash and the prescription medications without resident identifiers must be discarded in the drug disposal bin located in the medication room. 2nd Floor Back Medication Cart In an observation and interview on 05/10/22 at 11: AM, inventory of the 2nd Floor Front Medication Cart with RN B revealed: - An open bottle of Acidophilus, a probiotic, at room temperature in the drawer with manufacturer instructions of Refrigerate After Opening. - An open and in-use Ozempic Pen, an injectable medication used to treat diabetes, with no open date - An open, punctured and in-use vial of Lidocaine for Injection with a pharmacy fill date of 04/11/22 with no open date - An open bottle of Active Protein with manufacturer's instructions of 3-month shelf life from date opened with no open date - An open and in-use box of Carboxymethylcellulose Eye drops, a lubricant for dry eyes, with no patient identifiers RN B said nursing staff are expected to check their Medication Carts as used for expired, inappropriately stored and labeled medications. She did not know that the probiotic had to be refrigerated and since it wasn't it couldn't be used. RN B said that all refrigerated medications should be placed in the fridge because at room temperature they lose potency. She said that all insulin pens, multi-dose floor stock medications and multi-dose vials are labeled with the date they are opened In order to track expiration dates. RN B said she did not know when the vial Lidocaine did not have an open date it should be treated as expired and since the resident was no longer at the facility it should have been discarded previously. RN B said after expiration the Lidocaine vial might become contaminated which placed resident's at risk for infection if used. RN B said since the bottle of active protein did not have an open date it could not be used since it might be expired. She said the administration of expired protein supplements can place resident's at risk for adverse reactions such as GI upset. RN B said that all floor stock medications like the bottle of Carboxymethylcellulose eye drops should only be used for one resident and the container should have the resident's identifiers. She said since there were no patient identifiers on the container it could not be used because it can lead to cross contamination if used on more than one resident placing residents at risk of infection. RN B said that since the Ozempic Pen did not have an open date then it could no longer be used, because it might be expired. She said once expired the Ozempic pen loses potency and if used could place resident's at risk for uncontrolled blood pressure. RN B said inappropriately labeled or expired medications should be taken out of circulation and discarded in the drug disposal bin in the med room while the protein supplement can be thrown away in the trash. In an interview on 05/10/22 at 02:05 PM, the DON said that all medications should be locked in Medication Carts with access limited to staff administering medications that have keys to them. She said leaving carts unlocked and medications unattended in resident rooms, placed residents at risk of adverse reactions if medications are ingested. The DON said that all medications should have the original pharmacy label which includes patient identifiers and instructions for use. She said multi-dose insulin/injectable containers should be in a zip lock bag with the original pharmacy label as well as an open date that should be used to track the expiration date. The DON said if a multi-dose container did not have an open date it could not be used because it might be expired. She said when medications expire they can lose potency or become contaminated leading to resident's receiving inadequate dosing or experiencing adverse reactions such as infection for injectable medications and GI issues such as diarrhea for protein and nutritional supplements. The DON said that floor stock medication and individual prescriptions should always have patient identifiers and if patient identifiers are missing they should not be used because it places the residents at risk of getting the wrong medications. She said that all medications should be stored at manufacturer specified temperatures and for the duration specified by the manufacturer. The DON said since the bottles of Acidophilus, Active Protein and MedPass were not stored or discarded as instructed by the manufacturer they could lose potency, lead to ADRs and insufficient therapy. She said inappropriately labeled and expired medications should be discarded in the drug disposal bin located in the medication storage room while the supplements can be discarded in the trash. Record review of the facility document titled Nursing Unit Inspection revealed the 1st floor medication cart, and second floor medication carts were inspected on 04/22/22. Record review of the facility policy titled Storage of Medications revised April 2007 revealed, Policy Statement- The facility shall store all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure and orderly manner. Policy Interpretation and Implementation . 3- Drug containers that have missing, incomplete, improper, or incorrect labels shall be returned to the pharmacy for proper labeling before storing. 4- The facility shall not use discontinued , outdated, or deteriorated drugs or biologicals; all such drugs shall be returned to the dispensing pharmacy or destroyed. 7- Compartments (including, but not limited to, drawers, cabinets, rooms, refrigerators, carts, and boxes.) containing drugs and biologicals shall be locked when not in use, and trays or carts used to transport such items shall not be left unattended if open or otherwise potentially available to others. 9- Medications requiring refrigeration must be stored in refrigerator located in the drug room at the nurses' station or other secured location. Medications must be stored separately from food and must be labeled accordingly. Record review of the facility policy titled Labeling of Medication Containers revised April 2007 revealed, 2- Any medication packaging or containers that are inadequately or improperly labeled shall be returned to the issuing pharmacy. 4- Labels for each floor's stock medications shall include all necessary information such as . the expiration date when applicable. 6- Labels for over the counter drugs shall include all necessary information such as: the original label and the resident's name. Record review of the facility policy titled Medication Storage Guidance dated 2021 revealed, multi-dose vials for injection storage recommendations- Date when opened and discard unused portion after 28 days or in accordance with manufacturer's recommendations. If being used for more than one resident, keep in a centralized medication area (e.g., medication room or cart). Discard immediately if it enters an immediate treatment area (e.g., resident room). Record review of the facility policy titled Insulin Storage Recommendations dated 2021 revealed, - Insulin Aspart discard opened containers after 28 days at room temperature - Levemir discard opened containers after 42 days at room temperature - Basaglar (Insulin Glargine) discard opened containers after 28 days at room temperature. - Tresiba discard opened containers after 56 days at room temperature Record review of the facility policy titled Non-Insulin Injection Medications dated 2021 revealed, Ozempic Injection (Semaglutide). Prior to first use, store in the refrigerator at 36° to 46°F (2° to 8°C). Date when opened or when removed from the refrigerator and store for up to 56 days either at 59° to 86°F (15° to 30°C) or at 36° to 46°F (2° to 8°C). Keep pen cap on when not in use. Record review of the facility document titled 4.8 Medication Labels revised 08/01/18 revealed.2- All labels contain the following information: resident name, Expiration date and lot number, prescription number, quantity dispensed. 4- Labels should be securely attached to medications and expiration date and lot number be visible, if a label becomes illegible, soiled, or damaged, the medication should not be used and should be re-ordered. 5- Medications that are multiple dose vials (i.e., insulin) or containers (i.e., bulk liquids) must have a label indicating the date the container was first opened and when it expires. 5.1- Multi-dose vials expire 28 days after the date opened unless otherwise specified by the manufacturer.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • 38% turnover. Below Texas's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: 11 life-threatening violation(s), $188,419 in fines, Payment denial on record. Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 30 deficiencies on record, including 11 critical (life-threatening) violations. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
  • • $188,419 in fines. Extremely high, among the most fined facilities in Texas. Major compliance failures.
  • • Grade F (0/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: This facility has 11 Immediate Jeopardy findings. Serious concerns require careful evaluation.

About This Facility

What is University Place Nursing Center's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns UNIVERSITY PLACE NURSING CENTER an overall rating of 2 out of 5 stars, which is considered below average nationally. Within Texas, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.

How is University Place Nursing Center Staffed?

CMS rates UNIVERSITY PLACE NURSING CENTER's staffing level at 5 out of 5 stars, which is much above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 38%, compared to the Texas average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.

What Have Inspectors Found at University Place Nursing Center?

State health inspectors documented 30 deficiencies at UNIVERSITY PLACE NURSING CENTER during 2022 to 2024. These included: 11 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death) and 19 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.

Who Owns and Operates University Place Nursing Center?

UNIVERSITY PLACE NURSING CENTER is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 60 certified beds and approximately 32 residents (about 53% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in HOUSTON, Texas.

How Does University Place Nursing Center Compare to Other Texas Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Texas, UNIVERSITY PLACE NURSING CENTER's overall rating (2 stars) is below the state average of 2.8, staff turnover (38%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (1 stars) is much below the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting University Place Nursing Center?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations.

Is University Place Nursing Center Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, UNIVERSITY PLACE NURSING CENTER has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 11 Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 2-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Texas. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.

Do Nurses at University Place Nursing Center Stick Around?

UNIVERSITY PLACE NURSING CENTER has a staff turnover rate of 38%, which is about average for Texas nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.

Was University Place Nursing Center Ever Fined?

UNIVERSITY PLACE NURSING CENTER has been fined $188,419 across 2 penalty actions. This is 5.4x the Texas average of $34,963. Fines at this level are uncommon and typically indicate a pattern of serious deficiencies, repeated violations, or failure to correct problems promptly. CMS reserves penalties of this magnitude for facilities that pose significant, documented risk to resident health or safety. Families should request specific documentation of what issues led to these fines and what systemic changes have been implemented.

Is University Place Nursing Center on Any Federal Watch List?

UNIVERSITY PLACE NURSING CENTER is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.