PARK MANOR OF HUMBLE

19424 MCKAY DR, HUMBLE, TX 77338 (281) 319-4060
For profit - Limited Liability company 125 Beds HMG HEALTHCARE Data: November 2025 3 Immediate Jeopardy citations
Trust Grade
9/100
#538 of 1168 in TX
Last Inspection: February 2025

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Park Manor of Humble has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns about the care provided. They rank #538 out of 1168 facilities in Texas, placing them in the top half, but the low trust grade raises serious red flags. The facility's trend is improving, having reduced issues from five in 2024 to three in 2025, though they still have a long way to go. Staffing is a major weakness, with a poor rating of 1 out of 5 stars and a high turnover rate of 62%, which is concerning compared to the state average of 50%. Recent inspector findings highlighted critical incidents, including a failure to consult with a resident's physician and notify their representative when the resident showed signs of distress, leading to a tragic outcome. Additionally, the facility did not arrange timely emergency transportation for a resident who was having trouble breathing, which is alarming. While they do have excellent quality measures, the high fines of $181,138 for compliance issues and the average RN coverage suggest that families should carefully consider these factors when researching this nursing home.

Trust Score
F
9/100
In Texas
#538/1168
Top 46%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Getting Better
5 → 3 violations
Staff Stability
⚠ Watch
62% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
Penalties
○ Average
$181,138 in fines. Higher than 62% of Texas facilities. Some compliance issues.
Skilled Nurses
⚠ Watch
Each resident gets only 16 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Texas. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
Violations
⚠ Watch
19 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★★★☆☆
3.0
Overall Rating
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Staff Levels
★★★★★
5.0
Care Quality
★★★☆☆
3.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2024: 5 issues
2025: 3 issues

The Good

  • 5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in quality measures, fire safety.

The Bad

3-Star Overall Rating

Near Texas average (2.8)

Meets federal standards, typical of most facilities

Staff Turnover: 62%

16pts above Texas avg (46%)

Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity

Federal Fines: $181,138

Well above median ($33,413)

Significant penalties indicating serious issues

Chain: HMG HEALTHCARE

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

Staff turnover is elevated (62%)

14 points above Texas average of 48%

The Ugly 19 deficiencies on record

3 life-threatening
Feb 2025 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accor...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practices, the comprehensive care plan, and the residents' choices and based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #42) reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to obtain physician orders for an abrasion that Resident #42 sustained on his left leg after an incident on 2/1/25. This failure could place residents at risk of infections. Findings included: Record review of Resident #42's admission record dated 2/5/25 revealed a [AGE] year-old male who readmitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included severe protein calorie malnutrition, chronic kidney disease, elevated white blood cell count, hemiplegia (a symptom that involves one-sided paralysis), acute pancreatitis (inflammation of the pancreas), and weakness. Record review of Resident #42's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 15 out of 15 which indicated intact cognition. He required assistance from staff with ADL care. Record review of Resident #42's care plan dated 1/9/25 revealed he had potential impairment to skin integrity related to muscle weakness. Interventions were to observe skin injury for abnormalities, failure to heal, s/sx of infection, maceration etc. and report to MD. Resident #42 had a skin tear to left lower leg date initiated 2/1/25. Interventions were to treat area as indicated, if skin tear occurs, notify MD, family (date initiated 2/1/25). Record review of Resident #42's nursing note dated 2/1/25 by RN K read in part, .The medication aid informed the nurse that the patient had a scratch to his left lateral calf that was bleeding. The nurse clean [sic] with NS and apply a dry dressing. Record review of Resident #42's incident report dated 2/1/25 by RN K read in part, The CMA informed the nurse that the patient has some blood on his LL leg . The patient stated that he did not know how he did it . The nurse assess the area clean with NS pat dry and applied a dry dressing . No notifications to agencies/people were found on the incident report. Record review of Resident #42's nursing note dated 2/5/25 at 1:32 p.m. by the Wound Care Nurse read in part, .resident noted to have an open area to the lle . NP at facility and made aware. Upon assessment of area new order given to treat using TAO and cover with border gauze QOD and prn. Resident and RP made aware of new open area and tx in place . Record review of Resident #42's MD orders for February 2025 revealed no active, completed, or discontinued orders to address the skin tear to his left leg prior to 2/5/25. In an observation and interview on 2/3/25 at 9:52 a.m. of Resident #42 revealed there was a white dressing on his left leg dated 2/1/25 signed by P(unknown letter). Resident #42 said he scratched his leg on the door last night. In an interview and observation on 2/3/25 at 12:10 p.m. revealed Resident #42 was in the hallway. There was an open oval shaped scab area on his left leg near the knee. He said he removed the bandage from his left leg after his shower. In an observation on 2/3/25 at approximately 12:45 p.m. revealed there was a dressing on Resident #42's left leg dated 2/3/25 signed by DW that covered the previously observed open area. In an observation and interview on 2/5/25 at 12:56 p.m. of Resident #42's left leg revealed an uncovered scab/wound to his left leg near the knee. The area appeared pink. In an interview on 2/5/25 at 12:57 p.m. LVN W said Resident #42 had a skin tear and the Wound Care Nurse was going to look at it. She said she covered the area on Monday 2/3/25 until the Wound Care Nurse could look at it. In an interview on 2/5/25 at 1:03 p.m. the Wound Care Nurse said she was going to get an order to cover the area on Resident #42's leg. In an interview on 2/5/25 at 1:05 p.m. LVN W said she cleaned the area on Resident #42's left lower leg on Monday 2/3/25 but did not tell the Wound Care Nurse about it because it slipped her mind. She said she normally reported concerns to the Wound Care Nurse. She said she was not aware of the area until the resident asked her for a band-aid to cover it since the Surveyor kept asking about the open area. In an interview on 2/5/25 at 1:12 p.m. Resident #42's NP said he learned of the area on the Resident's leg today 2/5/25. He said the area looked fresh and appeared to be an abrasion. He said he provided orders to clean it with saline and triple antibiotic ointment every other day and to keep an eye on it. He said there was no drainage, but it was important to address because it could become infected. He said the facility normally notified him of areas like this one. In an observation and interview on 2/5/25 at 1:15 p.m. the Wound Care Nurse said she looked at the area on Resident #42's lower left extremity on Monday and it did not look the way it did today. The Wound Care Nurse showed the Surveyor what she saw on Monday which was a tiny circle area near the back of the lower left leg. In an interview on 2/5/25 at 1:25 p.m. LVN W said she saw the round shaped pink area on Resident #42's left lower leg near the knee on Monday 2/3/25 when she cleaned it. In an interview on 2/5/25 at 1:33 p.m. the Unit Manager said she spoke with RN K about Resident #42's incident over the weekend and the information provided was vague. She said she talked with RN K about notifications and said she should have put in an order. She said RN K should have notified the RP, DON, and the MD for an order. She said there was no order in the system. She said she saw the dressing on the resident Monday but did not see the skin underneath. She said she told the wound care nurse to follow up on it. In an interview on 2/5/25 at 1:46 p.m. the Shower Tech said she assisted Resident #42 with showers on Monday 2/3/25 and Wednesday 2/5/25. She said he had a pink circular area on his left leg today around 11 a.m. She said on Monday she noticed scratches to his leg. She said she documented the new area on the [NAME]. In an interview on 2/5/25 at 1:57 p.m. RN K said Resident #42 sustained a scrape to his left lower calf leg (over the weekend). She said it looked like 3 superficial scratches, about the size of a millimeter and similar to a previously healed scab. She said she patted it dry and put a border dressing on it. She said she dropped the ball and forgot to notify the NP because she got caught up late in the evening and the area was superficial. She said she would normally notify the NP that she cleaned it and put something on it. She said she notified the next shift that he had a scratch. In an interview on 2/5/25 at 2:14 p.m. the DON said on Monday 2/3/25 Resident #42 had a skin tear/abrasion and LVN W dressed it. She said she just learned of it and did not know what it looked like. She said a skin tear was considered an incident and nursing staff should notify the RP, MD/NP of the issue and write an incident report. She said RN K should have received an order for treatment, put it in the system, and carry it out because the area needed to be treated. She said if the incident process was not done the next shift would not know what to do for the skin tear/abrasion. In an interview on 2/5/25 at 2:10 p.m. the Administrator said he expected nursing staff to obtain orders right away for treatment provided and document it in the system. Record review of the facility's Skin Tears - Abrasions and Minor Breaks, care of policy October 2009 read in part, . The purpose of this procedure is to guide the prevention and treatment of abrasions, skin tears, and minor breaks in the skin . 1. Obtain a physician's order as needed . 1. An abrasion is an area on the skin that has been damaged by shearing, scraping, rubbing or trauma. A skin tear is the disruption of epidermis resulting in a lifting or shearing of the skin. 2. If the wound is bleeding, gently apply a compress with pressure over the wound. Reinforce the compress as needed to control any bleeding. 3. If the bleeding persists after efforts to stop it, or an object is embedded into the abrasion, or other medical attention is needed, notify the physician . 1.Notify the responsible family member. Physician notification may be routine (that is, non-immediate) if the abrasion is uncomplicated or not associated with significant trauma . Record review of the facility's Change in a Residents Condition or Status policy dated 2016 read in part, Our facility shall promptly notify the resident, his or her Attending Physician, and representative (sponsor) of changes in the resident's medical/mental condition and/or status (e.g., changes in level of care, billing/payments, resident rights, etc.) . 1. The nurse will notify the resident's Attending Physician or physician on call when there has been a(an): a. accident or incident involving the resident;
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploit...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, if the events that cause the allegation involved abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that caused the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (including the State Survey Agency) in accordance with State law through established procedures for 2 of 6 residents (Residents #39 and #52) reviewed for reporting allegations of abuse, neglect, and exploitation. -The facility failed to report an allegation of abuse of Resident #39 and Resident #52 to the State Agency within the two-hour timeframe. This failure could place residents at risk of abuse and neglect. Findings include: Resident #39 Record review of Resident #39's clinical record dated 2/5/25 revealed a [AGE] year-old female who admitted on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included bipolar disorder (a mental health condition that causes extreme mood swings), major depressive disorder, atherosclerotic heart disease (plaque buildup, or fatty deposits, in your arteries), and NSTEMI myocardial infarction (a type of heart attack that usually happens when your heart's need for oxygen can't be met). Record review of Resident #39's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 11/11/24 revealed a BIMS score of 15 out of 15 which indicated intact cognition. She required assistance from staff with ADL care. Record review of Resident #39's care plan reviewed 12/6/24 revealed she had potential for psychosocial well-being problem. She had a diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder bipolar type. Interventions were to encourage resident to verbalize feelings of perceptions, and fears. She was also a recipient of alleged verbal aggressive behavior from a resident at risk for psychosocial well-being problem dated 2/3/25. Interventions were to allow the resident time to answer questions and to verbalize feelings, perceptions, and fears. Record review of Resident #39's nursing notes dated 2/3/25 at 5:17 p.m. by the Social Worker read in part, This writer and Administrator went to speak with resident in regards to statement made to Surveyor that her roommate is verbally abusing her. This writer asked her what was stated that made her feel verbally abused. She states her RM is Cussing and yelling in the room and she, the RM, states I am the reason her family does not come to see her and that I am the reason [Administrator] will not let her DC from facility. She also asked me why do you look like that why are you in that chair, are you touching my things, are you stealing my stuff. [Resident #39] reports then she had a traumatic childhood and does not need her bringing all that back to her. I did not want state thinking that you were not assisting me. I just wanted to get out of there, she is nonstop on a 10 all the time . Record review of Resident #39 and Resident #26's chart revealed they shared the same room from 1/16/25 - 2/3/25. In an interview on 2/3/25 at 1:03 p.m. Resident #39 said her roommate (Resident #26) was rude and verbally abusive to her. She said Resident #26 yelled at her and started arguments. She said they were not getting along before they moved in together. She said she spoke to the Administrator previously about changing rooms but there were no rooms available. She said she was informed today there was a room available for her to move to. She said she had been roommates with Resident #26 for approximately 1-3 weeks and was physically and mentally exhausted. In an interview on 2/3/25 at 1:14 p.m. the Social Worker said some residents complained about Resident #26 but she did not know Resident #39 felt abused by the her. In an interview on 2/3/25 at 1:17 p.m. the State Surveyor reported to the Administrator that Resident #39 said she felt verbally abused by her roommate, Resident #26. Administrator said this was the first time he heard she felt abused. In an interview on 2/3/25 at 2:22 p.m. the Administrator said they moved Resident #39 to another room and would interview her. In an interview on 2/4/25 at 12:22 p.m. the Administrator said during his interview with Resident #39 (on 2/3/25) she informed him that Resident #26 would cuss and she did not like those words, it reminded her of childhood trauma. He said Resident #39 informed him she might not have used the right words (regarding abuse) and just wanted to be moved as quickly as possible. In an interview on 2/5/25 at 8:15 a.m. Resident #39 said Resident #26 would yell, cuss, and accuse her of theft. She said she was weary and felt abused and threatened by her and thought the Administrator and Social Worker understood that. She said when the Administrator and Social Worker interviewed her (on 2/3/25), they did not ask her if she felt abused. In an interview on 2/5/25 at 9:19 a.m. Resident #26 said she and Resident #39 were roommates for a couple of weeks. She said they did not get along, but she never yelled, cussed, or treated her bad. In an interview on 2/5/25 at 9:28 a.m. the Social Worker said she and the Administrator spoke with Resident #39 (after being informed of the incident on 2/3/25) to obtain her statement and the resident restated verbal abuse. She said Resident #39 informed her that Resident #26 would cuss in the room and asked her if she was touching or stealing her stuff. The Social Worker said Resident #39 mentioned emotional childhood trauma that she did not want brought back. She said when Resident #39 first moved in with Resident #26, Resident #39 requested a room change because they were too much alike. She said the facility tried to move her last week but was unable to (for various reasons). She said Resident #26 had issues with some of the residents at the facility, but no one previously said she was verbally abusive. In an interview on 2/5/25 at 9:43 a.m. the Administrator said when he and the Social Worker talked to Resident #39, she did not state she felt abused and there was no emotional change. He said when the facility followed up with her, she kept saying she was happy to be out of there and thought it was best to report the incident. He said he was first alerted by the State Survey on Monday 2/3/25 about the allegation of abuse. He said generally with any allegation of abuse, if stated they feel they've been abused, they would report it within 2 hours to the State Agency. He said it was a case by case with the resident, and Resident #39 may have used the wrong words. He said they determined it would best to report the incident to the State Agency and reported it this morning 2/5/25, outside of the reporting window. In an interview on 2/5/25 at 10:09 a.m. the DON said she was informed yesterday 2/4/25 by the Social Worker that Resident #39 felt verbally abused by Resident #26. She said verbal abuse was the threat to do harm, cussing at them, and being called out of their name (someone referring to you in a way that is demeaning or disrespectful). She said she conducted in-services with staff on abuse, neglect, resident rights, and customer service. In an interview on 2/5/25 at 2:07 p.m. the Administrator said he was the Abuse Coordinator and was responsible for reporting allegations of abuse which included physical, sexual, and verbal. He said verbal abuse could include degrading, putting someone down, or making fun of them. Record review of facility incident report regarding Resident #39 revealed a received date of 2/5/25 via web application. Resident #52 Record review of Resident #52's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 1/24/25 revealed a [AGE] year-old male who readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnosis included stroke, end stage renal disease, and Alzheimer's disease. He had a BIMS score of 6 out of 15 which indicated severe cognitive impairment. He required assistance from staff with ADL care. In an interview on 2/3/25 at 9:25 a.m. Resident #52 said last month the shower lady (name unknown) pushed him into the wall. He said his back was hurting. This Surveyor reported it to the Administrator, and he said they would check his arm out. In an interview on 2/5/25 at 9:28 a.m. the Social Worker said she was informed of the situation with Resident #52 yesterday 2/4/25 by the Administrator. She said Resident #52 told her a girl picked him up like a football and slammed him against the wall approximately one year ago. In an interview on 2/5/25 at 9:57 a.m. the Administrator said he was originally made aware of the allegation of abuse of Resident #52 on Monday, 2/3/25. He said he was unable to get details from Resident #52. He said the Social Worker spoke with the resident this morning and stated the incident occurred one year ago. He said Resident #52 was requesting an x-ray of his back. He said he generally reported to the State Agency allegations of abuse within 2 hours and start the investigation. Record review of facility incident report regarding Resident #52 revealed a received date of 2/5/25 via web application. Record review of the facility's Reporting Abuse to Facility Management policy dated 2009 read in part, .It is the responsibility of our employees, facility consultants, Attending Physicians, family members, visitors etc., to promptly report any incident or suspected incident of neglect or resident abuse, including injuries of unknown source, and theft or misappropriation of resident property to facility management . 1. Abuse is defined as the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish. 2. Verbal abuse is defined as any use of oral, written or gestured language that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms to residents or their families, or within their hearing distance, to describe residents, regardless of their age, ability to comprehend, or disability . Record review of the facility's Resident-to-Resident Altercations policy dated 2016 read in part, .All altercations, including those that may represent resident-to-resident abuse, shall be investigated and reported to the Nursing Supervisor, the Director of Nursing Services and to the Administrator . 11. Report incidents, findings, and corrective measures to appropriate agencies as outlined in our facility's abuse reporting policy .
Jan 2025 1 deficiency
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0925 (Tag F0925)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program to remai...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program to remain free of pests and rodents for four of four residents and one of four halls. The facility failed to ensure the building is free of cockroaches. This failure could place residents at risk of, infection, skin irritation, allergies, which could result in unsanitary living conditions and decline in health and well-being. Finding included: In an interview with Resident #37 on 01/23/2025 at 10:42am, Resident #37 stated the facility did have roaches and it's because a few residents eat in their rooms. Resident #37 stated there were times when they would try to stomp on the roaches with their shoe and would miss. When addressing the issue to the facility staff, Resident #37 was told it was a delusion of seeing the roaches, but an exterminator was brought in shortly after speaking with facility staff. The exterminator did place pellets along the side of the walls to kill any sighting of roaches. In an interview with Resident #21 on 01/24/2025 at 10:25am Resident #21 stated there was a concern with the roaches in the facility. Resident #21 also stated the last sighting of roaches was a couple of days ago in their room. Resident #21 also stated the roaches use to be worse, but things have gotten better over time. In an interview with MAINT on, 01/24/2025 at 9:08 am, MAINT stated the facility used an electronic request, which all staff members have access to log for seen pest, regardless of if they are alive or dead. There was also a logbook for any sightings of roaches that was reported by staff, which was checked daily, several times a day. The facility has had a roach issue within the last three months and used a pest control service. When there was a sighting of roaches in a specific hallway, the pest control company focused more on the hall that has the most sighting of roaches. The pest control does come out twice a month and is on call as needed. In an interview with CMA2 on 01/24/2025 at 10:34 am CMA2 said she had been at the facility for less than a month and normally worked a rotating shift CMA2 stated if a roach was in front of them, they would kill it, pick it, and contact maintenance or housekeeping to address the issues. In an observation on 1/24/25 at 11:25am, a small roach was seen in the conference room, crawling on the back of a chair by the Survey team. During an interview with ADMN on 01/24/2025 at 11:34am the ADMN was informed that the Survey team saw a roach crawling on the chair in the conference room. ADMN stated the first thing that could be done was to clear the room and contact someone from the maintenance facility to come in and spray. ADMN also stated that if that wasn't necessary at the time, pest control would be called, due to a sighting of the live roach in the conference room. The ADMN said there had been recent foundation work completedin the facility and it was unknown where the roaches were coming from. ADMN was questioned about the can of RAID (commercial bug spray) that was sitting on the desk in the office and ADMN stated they were unsure why it was there, but possibly brought in by someone on the maintenance team. ADMN confirmed pest control does come to the facility once a week and the maintenance team at the facility does spray as needed or if an issue was brought to their attention. ADMN stated there were no other concerns at this time with pests, just roaches. In an interview with ADON on 01/24/2025 at 12:33pm she said she had been with the facility for seven years and had experienced the pest control issue with roaches for some time. ADON stated the facility does have a treatment plan with the pest control company, as they do come out and spray. ADON has seen reports of residents who have complained about the issue and does follow up with the resident in a substantial amount of time to see if the issue has been resolved but cannot recall when the last time was it was reported individually to them. Record review of the Pest Control Logbook, Perfect Pest Control, where facility staff was to provide sighting of dead or alive roaches starting 09/2024 to the most recent physical sighting of roaches, 01/22/2025. The halls of the roaches were within the halls of 100-400. There were also sightings of roaches within this time frame in the admissions office, conference room, laundry, and in the hallways. Record review of Pest Control Service Inspection Report for the last 90 days dated, 11/18/2024,revealed in this weekly visit the technician treated the following rooms: 111, 112, 114, 115, and 117 as it was reported of live roaches and they were observed during the visit for treatment. It was noted that in room [ROOM NUMBER], there was poor sanitation in the room, which many roaches were seen by the technician. Record review of the Pest Control Service Inspection Report for the last 90 days dated, 12/09/2024 with several sightings of live roaches in the following rooms: 110, 112, 114, 115, 116, and 117. It was noted some of the rooms had food in the drawers and rooms need storage improvement. The facility was using weekly service treatment at this time. Record review of Perfect Pest Control Service Inspection Report for the last 90 days dated, 01/06/2025 from the pest technician for a weekly visit. It was documented by the technician of the pest control company the focus of the week was the 300 hallway and treated. A room on the 400 hall was logged for roach issues and treated. There were multiple cockroaches observed in the laundry room. The facility was using weekly service treatment at this time. Record review of the facility policy and procedure for Pest Control, revised August 2008 read in part: Policy Statement - Our facility shall maintain an effective pest control program. Policy Interpretation and Implementation - 1. This facility maintains an on-going pest control program to ensure that the building is kept free of insects and rodents. 2. Pest control services are provided by pest control company. 3. Windows are always screened 5. Garbage and trash are not permitted to accumulate and are removed from the facility daily. 6. Maintenance services assist, when appropriate and necessary, in providing pest control services.
Oct 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0925 (Tag F0925)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program for 3 of...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program for 3 of 6 residents (Resident #1, #2, and #3) reviewed for pest control. -Resident #1 had one medium sized roach crawling on the wall behind her bed. -Resident #2 had several medium and small size roaches crawling on the floor and wall next to her bed. -Resident #3 had a small roach crawling on the wall in her room. This failure could place residents at risk of residing in an environment with pests. Findings included: Resident #1 Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 10/15/24 revealed a [AGE] year-old female who admitted on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included anxiety, bipolar disorder (mental illness characterized by extreme mood swings), insomnia (difficulty either falling or staying asleep), cognitive communication deficit, and muscle weakness. Record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 9 out of 15 which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. She required substantial assistance from staff for ADL care. Resident #1's active diagnoses included bipolar, insomnia, and muscle weakness. Record review of Resident #1's care plan dated 9/23/24 revealed the following: Focus - [Resident #1] is demonstrating ineffective coping: Sleepiness/Insomnia related to restlessness. Goal - Meet individual requirements for sleep to function safely without fatigue. Resident #2 Record review of Resident #2's face sheet dated 10/15/24 revealed a [AGE] year-old female who admitted on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included hypertension (high blood pressure), saddle embolus of pulmonary artery (large blood clot gets stuck in the main pulmonary artery), dementia (memory loss), and pressure ulcer of unspecified site, unstageable. Record review of Resident #2's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 15 out of 15 which indicated she was cognitively intact. She required moderate assistance from staff for ADL care. Resident #2's active diagnoses included stroke, hypertension, and dementia. Resident #3 Record review of Resident #3's face sheet dated 10/15/24 revealed an [AGE] year-old female who admitted on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included type 2 diabetes (high glucose), glaucoma (condition that damages the eye's optic nerve), morbid obesity, major depressive disorder, anxiety, and cognitive communication deficit. Record review of Resident #3's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 13 out of 15 which indicated she was cognitively intact. She required assistance from staff for ADL care. Resident #2's active diagnoses included she had medically complex conditions, hypertension, depression, and cognitive communication deficit. Observation and Interview on 10/15/2024 at 9:15 a.m. of Resident #1 revealed she was awake lying in bed. Resident #1 responded to this State Surveyor's greeting and said, I am tired. Resident #1 took a long sigh said she was tired from waking up throughout the night from swatting at and killing roaches that had been crawling in her bed. There was a roach crawling on the wall behind the resident's bed. There were two dead roaches that were flattened at her bedside. CNA A walked into Resident #1's room and killed the roach. CNA A left to notify the ADMIN. Resident #1 said she has had roaches in her bed and had to continuous swat them off her bed and they have crawled on her as well. She said she has told numerous staff every day. She said the facility said they had sprayed but she did not think it worked. In an interview on 10/15/2024 at 9:16 a.m. CNA A said she saw roaches in resident #1 and 2's room. She said she saw the roaches on Resident #1's bedside table and her bed. She said she documented the sightings in the pest control binder at the nurse's station. She said Resident #1 appeared tired when she rounded at the beginning of her shift (6:00 a.m.). She said the resident was at risk for skin irritation and fear of the roaches crawling on her. Observation and Interview on10/15/2024 at 9:22 a.m. of Resident #2 revealed she was sitting on the edge of her bed. She said she saw roaches in her room on the floor and her walls. Resident #2 had several roaches crawling on the floor and wall next to her bed. Resident #2's head was looking down and said she did not like the roaches in her room. She said it made her skin crawl. Observation and interview on 10/15/24 at 9:30 a.m. of Resident #3 revealed she was lying in bed. She said saw roaches crawl on her walls. She had a fly swatter and said she used it to kill roaches that crawled on her bed. She said the facility sprayed her room a few weeks ago but she said she still saw roaches. She said the pest control placed a roach motel in the room to catch the roaches. There was a green paper tube that was full of dead roaches. Interview on 10/15/2024 at 9:40 a.m. this State Surveyor notified the ADMIN about the roach activity observed. Interview on 10/15/24 at 1:42 p.m. with the ADMIS said she was assigned to Resident #2 for daily Angel Rounds. She said angel rounds were performed daily to ask the residents if they had any concerns and check the room for any problems. She said she saw live and dead roaches in Resident #3's room last week. She said after she saw the roaches, she notified staff in the morning meetings. She said when she saw the live roaches, she did not bring it to Resident #3's attention and was not able to say how the resident reacted. Interview on 10/15/24 at 1:50 p.m. with the Dir. of T&L said she had seen roaches in Resident #2's room from time to time. She said Resident #2 had complained about the roaches in her room and the Dir. of T&L said she advised staff in the morning meeting (consisted of department heads). She said she last saw roaches yesterday (10/14/24) but did not attend the morning meeting today because she had an appointment . In an interview on 10/15/24 at 1:57 p.m. the DON said she made daily rounds to identify any concerns in resident rooms. She said crumbs and food kept in the room by residents contributed to increased roach activity. She said pest control came monthly and when there were active sightings. She said the risk for residents was skin irritation. She said all staff were responsible for identifying pests in resident rooms. Interview on 10/15/24 at 2:12 p.m. the ADMIN said the facility staff performed ambassador rounds daily to identify resident concerns and/or room concerns. He said staff were instructed, if they saw any type of insect, to document it in the pest control binder. He said the facility had tried making sure open food was not in the rooms and deep cleaned the rooms when pests were found. He said the facility had monthly pest control and additional visits from pest control when activity was seen. He said roaches or any type of pest was not acceptable in resident rooms . Record review of facility pest control vendor service form dated 10/8/24 and 10/14/24 revealed the following: 10/8/24 - Reported Activity: Log book - German cockroaches in various rooms. Observed issues - German cockroach evidence. 10/14/24 - No facility log entries. Dead roaches found . Record review of the facility's Pest Control policy dated May 2001 (Revised May 2008) revealed the following read in part, Our facility shall maintain an effective pest control program . 1. This facility maintains an on-going pest control program to ensure that the building is kept free of insects . Record review of the facility's pest control binder dated 9/9/24 - 10/15/24 revealed the facility had roach sightings in Resident #1's room on 10/15/24 and Resident #2's room on 9/30/24, 10/3/24, and 10/15/24. Pest control vendor has an entry that indicated the book was reviewed on 10/14/24.
May 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0557 (Tag F0557)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity and respect for 3 (Resid...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity and respect for 3 (Resident #1, #5, and #7) of 10 residents reviewed for residents' rights in that: -Resident #1 was found to have soiled (feces) wipes left in her brief until her scheduled shower time. -Residents #5 and #7 did not have their briefs changed in a timely manner according to the facility's policy and procedures. These deficient practices could place residents at risk for impaired dignity, loss of self-worth, and a decline in psychosocial well-being. Findings included: Resident #1 Record review of Resident #1's face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of Lymphedema (define), Rheumatoid Arthritis (define), Primary Hypertension (high blood pressure), and Generalized Muscle Weakness. Observation and Interview on 5/11/2024 at 1:57 PM revealed Resident #1 alert and oriented to person, place, time, and event. Her daughter was at her bedside. Staff transferred Resident #1 from the bed to her wheelchair. She was waiting to be discharged from the facility. The resident said the facility was short staffed, so the level of care was inadequate and unacceptable . She said she was incontinent to bowel and bladder. She said the CNA left soiled (feces) wipes in her brief before bringing her to take her scheduled shower. She said knowing a soiled wipe had been left in her brief made her feel uncomfortable and upset. She said she told her daughter, spoke with the administrator, and filed a grievance. She said the treatment and conditions were unacceptable, and she could not wait to leave the facility. She said she felt dehumanized when they left the soiled wipe in her brief. She said she was embarrassed and worried about potential infection from the fecal contact with her private parts. Resident #5 Record review of Resident #5's face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of schizoaffective disorder (combination of symptoms of schizophrenia and mood disorder, such as depression or Bipolar Disease), Bipolar Disorder (mental illness that causes unusual shifts in mood from extreme highs to lows), Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), Generalized Muscle Weakness, and Morbid Obesity. Record review of Resident #5's MDS dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a BIMS score of 15 indicating she was cognitively intact. Interview on 05/11/24 at 3:53 PM, Resident #5, said she had been at the facility for five years. She said she has to call the CNA several times before they change her brief. She said it would take so long she had to use her cell phone to contact the front desk staff because the call light was not answered. She said the problem was not enough staff. She said there had been a slow decline in care, and she would get very upset when it took so long to change her brief because she had sensitive skin, and she worried her urine would cause skin breakdown and turn into some worse. She said she felt like less of a person while she waited hours to change her soiled briefs. She said it made her feel like no one cared. Resident #7 Record review of Resident #7's face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of Dementia (memory loss), Primary Hypertension (high blood pressure), Peripheral Vascular Disease (poor circulation), and Muscle Wasting. Record review of resident #7's MDS dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a BIMS score of 15 indicating the resident was cognitively intact. Interview on 5/12/24 at 10:25 AM with Resident #7, he said his shower days were Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Saturdays. He said sometimes he had gone without his brief being changed during an entire shift. He said the facility was shorthanded and needed help. He said, I feel small and not like a human being when they do not change me when I need to be changed. In a telephone interview on 05/12/24 at 11:24 AM with CNA A, she said she had worked at the facility for 7 years. She said she worked as the shower tech from 6:00 AM to 2:00 PM Monday through Friday. She said she remembered a resident who had a wipe with stool left in her brief. She said it was removed when she took her brief off for her scheduled (Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays) shower . She said she thought it was an accident and wasn't purposely left in the brief by CNA B. CNA A said this was the first time she witnessed a wipe left in a resident's brief. Interview on 05/12/24 at 1:05 PM with the Administrator, he said the reason why CNA B was no longer on the schedule was due to the incontinent care concern with Resident #1. Record review of facility policy titled Resident Rights and Guidelines for all Nursing Procedures, undated, read in part, . Prior to having direct-care responsibilities for residents, staff must have appropriate in-service training on resident rights, including Resident dignity and respect . Record review of facility policy titled Perineal Care, revised December 2011, read in part, .The purposes of this procedure are to provide cleanliness and comfort to the resident, to prevent infections and skin irritation, and to observe the resident's skin condition . .
Mar 2024 3 deficiencies 3 IJ
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Deficiency F0551 (Tag F0551)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, that facility failed to extend to the resident representative ' s the right to make decisi...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, that facility failed to extend to the resident representative ' s the right to make decisions on behalf of the resident for 1 of 10 residents (CR#1) reviewed for resident rights in that. 1. The facility failed to establish if CR#1 wanted to the leave the facility to the hospital when requested by the Resident Representative (RR) when he was alert and oriented times four. 2. The facility failed to arrange emergency transportation to local hospital when requested by RR for CR#1 when he expressed having trouble breathing on [DATE] and complained of abdominal pain with diarrhea. CR#1 was wheeled to a local hospital on [DATE] and expired while at the hospital on [DATE]. - An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on [DATE]. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 5:43pm. While the IJ was removed on [DATE], the facility remained out of compliance due to the facility's need to complete in-service training and evaluate the effectiveness of their corrective systems. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving treatment when requested by the resident or RR. Findings included : Record review of CR#1's face sheet dated, [DATE], reflected he was a [AGE] year-old male, admitted to the facility on [DATE] as his own responsible party with diagnoses of metabolic encephalopathy(chemical imbalance in the blood affecting the brain), sepsis(infection), pneumonia (lung infection), end stage renal disease (kidney failure), pleural effusion (excess fluid affecting the lungs), dyspnea(Shortness of breath), atherosclerotic heart disease(plaque buildup in the arteries of the heart), and atrial fibrillation(irregular heartbeat). CR#1 was discharged on [DATE] against medical advice in the care of RR who pushed him by wheelchair to the hospital Record review of CR#1 baseline care plan dated [DATE] with no information to indicate resident cognitive level. Record review of CR#1's admission nursing progress note entered by RN D with effective date [DATE] read in part, .Resident awake alert oriented x4. Resident denies pain or discomfort. No acute distress noted. Lungs clear bilaterally. Respiration even and [unlaboured]. Abdomen soft. Bowel present x 4 [quadrents] . Record review of CR#1's nursing progress note entered by LVN B dated [DATE] read in part Upon arrival, resident noted saying I'm in pain, I don't know what to do repeatedly. When asked for a specific location of pain, resident touched his abdomen, RR present in room. Writer palpated residents abdomen, upper quadrants hard but non distended (enlarged), lower quadrants soft, non distended. Resident states he has frequent regular bowel movements and 10-6 nurse(LVN A) stated resident had a large bowel movement(bm) on her shift. Vitals assessed and are all wnl (within normal limits), NP (Nurse Practitioner) notified and gave orders to get STAT Chest XRAYS and KUB. Writer informed residents RR of this information however she refused stating he needs to be seen in the ER immediately. Residents RR dressed resident, transferred him into his wheelchair and rolled him out of the facility. RR informed that by making this call, resident is leaving Against Medical Advice(AMA). RR begin calling staff members idiots and continued to leave the facility. DON and NP notified. Record review of CR#1 medical records from local hospital with admission date of [DATE] with chief complaint of diarrhea and shortness of breath (SOB). Computed Tomography Scan(CT SCAN a diagnostic imaging procedure) completed of abdomen and pelvis with left free intraperitoneal gas suspicious for perforated hollow viscus (air under the diaphragm suggesting a hole or series of holes in the intestine or bowel) with recommendation for surgical consult. CT SCAN revealed complete collapse of left lower lobe and partial collapse of the right lower lobe. Death summary revealed family declined surgical intervention, made CR#1 do-not-resuscitate (DNR), and resident transition care to comfort measures only. Resident expired on [DATE] while at the hospital. In a phone interview on [DATE] at 9:10 am with RR, she said that CR#1 called her on [DATE] at 5:00am saying he could not breath and his stomach hurt bad, so she went to the facility. She said a nurse came into the room when she arrived at the facility, and said she contacted a doctor, he ordered a x-ray that would take 4 hours. She said she told the nurse (name unknown) she could not wait 4 hours because CR#1 could not breathe, and the nurse said that's what the doctor said to do. She said she told the nurse she was taking him to emergency room (ER). She said that she asked nurses at the facility to help put CR#1 in the car, and she was told they were not allowed to help. She called 911 to take CR#1 to the hospital, Emergency Medical Services (EMS) told her that permission was needed to come on private property, she asked a nurse to give EMS permission to come on the property, and she was told they could not give permission. She said that she had to push CR#1 in his wheelchair to the ER(located 0.6 miles from the facility). She said that while at the hospital CR#1 had a CT scan that confirmed a perforated intestine (diagnostic imaging procedure to confirm presences of a hole or series of holes in the intestine or bowel). In an interview on [DATE] at 10:50am with ADMIN, he said he received a called from RR on [DATE], who was upset about policy and procedure regarding leaving against medical advice (AMA) and where responsibility lies. He said CR#1 was at the facility less than 10 hours, and while admitted complained of abdominal pain. He said that stat KUB (X-ray of abdominal area for causes of abdominal pain) and other tests were ordered but RR did not want to wait. He said that RR took CR#1 from the facility AMA, could not get CR#1 in the vehicle, staff explained that once she took resident from the facility help could not be provided. He said that according to the RR she called 911, was told that permission was required to come to the facility, but he had not heard of a dispatcher needing permission to come to the facility before. In an interview on [DATE] at 12:48pm with LVN C, she said that she worked from 6:00am-2:00pm on [DATE] as the treatment nurse. She said that she was going to respond to the call light of CR#1, RR came into the hall as she approached the door, she asked if RR if she needed anything, and RR said she was taking CR#1 to the hospital. She said that she told RR to allow her to get LVN B, the nurse assigned to the hall. She said that she told LVN B that RR wanted to take CR#1 to the hospital, and she went back to her duties. She said that she overheard nursing staff (names unknown) saying that CR#1 was leaving AMA, she did not hear the details why, or if staff offered assistance with transportation. In a phone interview on [DATE] at 12:59pm with LVN B, she said that she worked on [DATE] from 6:00am-2:00pm. She said that at 7:00am RR was at the facility an alerted that CR#1 was having abdominal pain and there was no mention of CR#1 having trouble breathing. She said that she assessed CR#1, his stomach was not distended, his vitals were in normal range, CR#1 said that he had pain in abdomen, RR said she wanted CR#1 to go to the hospital, and she explained to RR that she had to call the doctor first. She said that she called NP, who ordered stat labs and x-ray. She said that she returned to the room of CR#1 who had been dressed and placed in wheelchair by RR, and RR said that she was not willing to wait on labs and she was taking CR#1 to the hospital immediately. She said that she told RR to wait on labs and then they could send CR#1 out to the hospital. She said that she called DON, while RR called 911 as she was taking CR#1 to the front entrance, and she tried to explain that CR#1 would be leaving AMA. She said that RR was still on the phone with 911 as she passed LVN C, RR spoke to LVN C, RR called them idiots, and left the facility with CR#1. She said that RR never asked her for assistance or for her to speak with anyone while on the phone with 911. She said that she did not follow RR and CR#1 outside and she was unsure if other staff followed them. She said that process if resident or family was requesting to go out to the hospital was to notify the physician for an order, if physician does not give the order, the family or resident can call 911 themselves. In a phone interview on [DATE] at 1:28pm with NP, he said that he was notified CR#1 was having abdominal pain, orders given for stat x-ray and KUB, but residents family was refusing and wanted to go to the hospital. He said that if a resident or family was wanting to refuse treatment and go the hospital, he would always say send them to the hospital. He said that a resident and family have the right to refuse treatment and go to the hospital. He said that he could not see a situation where he would not give order to send resident to the hospital when requested, by resident or family as long as family has POA (Power of Attorney) and can make decision. In an interview on [DATE] at 2:03pm with CNA E, he said that he worked 6:00am-2:00pm on [DATE]. He said that he was running late to work, and it was approximately 7:00am when he saw CR#1 being pushed in a wheelchair by RR towards the hospital. He said that he reported what he saw to the DON when got to the facility. In a phone interview on [DATE] at 3:40am with LVN A, she said that during shift change RR complained that the abdomen of CR#1 looked distended while she was giving report at the end of her shift. She said that three were two other nurses (names unknown) present to assess CR#1. She said that his stomach did not appear to be distended but RR wanted CR#1 to go to the hospital. She said that they tried explaining that it was not the facility protocol to send resident to the hospital without order from doctor and the doctor may request labs first. She said that another nurse in the room told RR that she could call 911. She said that RR wheeled CR#1 out of the facility. In an interview on [DATE] at 4:16pm with DON, she said that she started at the facility in January of 2024. She said that she was told that the RR of CR#1 signed him out AMA and took him to the hospital. She said that staff told her they saw RR pushing CR#1 to the hospital. She said that there were calls to the facility with concerns that two residents had eloped because they were seen walking to the hospital. She said that RR spoke to ADMIN and said that she called 911, but EMS was not dispatched because they needed permission to come on the property. She said that she did an in-service (training) after the incident because it was bad for optics and concerns for customer service after the facility received calls with concerns that two residents had eloped and were seen walking down the street. She said that staff should consider if resident is able to speak for themselves when the request is made by family. She said that staff should contact the doctor because a resident cannot be discharged or transferred without an order from the doctor, or it is considered AMA. She said that if staff tell doctor that family or resident is wanting to go the hospital and the physician says to let them go that is not AMA. She said that resident and family have the right to call 911, remain inside of the facility and wait on EMS to arrive. She said that staff should speak with 911 dispatcher if requested. In a follow up interview on [DATE] at 11:47am with LVN C, she said that she was nowhere near RR and CR#1 while RR was on the 911 call. She said that she was never asked to speak with 911 dispatcher, and he was not asked to help transfer CR#1 into the vehicle of RR so that he could be taken to the hospital. She said that she never entered the room of CR#1 and she only saw him briefly from the hallway. In a phone interview on [DATE] at 12:20pm with Physician, she said that a resident or responsible party have the right to refuse treatment and request transfer to hospital, and she has never not provided an order to transfer a resident when requested. She said that if a resident discharged AMA, she would expect the facility to follow their policy. She said if a resident discharged AMA and there was a concern with their safety during the discharged , she would give an order to send the resident to the hospital by 911. She said that a resident being pushed to the hospital by a relative would be considered unsafe. In a phone interview on [DATE] at 1:05pm with LVN B, she said that she worked on [DATE] from 6:00am-2:00pm. She said that RR left the facility with CR#1 before she could give her the discharge AMA documents, she left before she had a chance to do anything. She said that she did not follow RR and CR#1 to the front of the building or outside of the facility. She said RR did not ask her to speak with 911 or for assistance with getting CR#1 into her vehicle. She said that she had been trained that staff could not help with transferring to a vehicle. She said that there had been no training on what step should be taken after a resident is outside of the facility during a discharge AMA. In a phone interview on [DATE] at 1:16pm with LVN A, she said that both LVN B and LVN C were present in the room when CR#1 was assessed for abdominal pain, but she did not remember if it was LVN B or LVN C that told RR to call 911. She said RR did not ask her to speak with 911 or for assistance with getting CR#1 into her vehicle. She said that she had been trained that staff could not help with transferring to a vehicle. She said that there had been no training on what step should be taken after a resident was outside of the facility during a discharge AMA. In an interview on [DATE] at 2:03pm with RN I, she said that did not work on [DATE] but she knew that State Survey Agency (SSA) was investigating CR#1 being pushed in a wheelchair to the hospital by RR. She said that if she had been on duty the situation would not have gotten that far because she would have assessed resident, called the physician, and asked for order to send CR#1 to the hospital by 911 or scheduled transport depending on RR request. She said there has never been situation that a physician declined the order. She said that she would have done what ever was necessary to prevent the family from walking to the hospital because that was not safe. She said there had been no training about what step should be taken in a situation like what happened to CR#1, only that you provide care while in facility and cannot help with transferring the resident into a vehicle once the leave the facility. She said although she had not been trained to do so, she would have followed CR#1 and RR to parking lot to ensure she was going to be able to transfer the resident safely to the vehicle. She said that if she observed the transfer to be unsafe, RR was unable to get CR#1 in the car or started walking with CR#1 she would have called 911, followed by DON, Administrator, and physician. In an interview on [DATE] at 2:28pm with CSD, he said that he was a RN with corporate office. He was not made aware of situation with CR#1 being discharged AMA. He said that if a resident or responsible party requested to have a resident sent to the hospital the nurse should first ask to assess the resident so that notification could be made to the physician. He said that the physician may give orders for treatment prior to the order to go the hospital. He said that if the resident or responsible party are not in agreement with treatment then the nurse should call the physician and give information to physician for order of emergency or non-emergency transportation to the hospital based on what resident or responsible party wanted. He said that if a physician declines to provide the order the family could be educated on calling 911 but staff should be available to assist. He said if the decision is to discharge AMA, care would still be provided to a resident while inside of the facility. He said that staff are not able to help transfer a resident to vehicle because the facility can be liable if something happened during the transfer once outside of the facility. He said that staff should be contacting the DON or ADMIN when there is a discharge AMA for instructions. In an interview on [DATE] at 3:04pm with RVP, she said that she was not made aware of situation with CR#1 being discharged AMA. She said that if a resident or responsible party was requesting to be sent to the hospital, staff should notify the physician for an order to send the resident based on the request by emergency or non-emergency transport. She said that resident and responsible have the right to decline treatment and seek treatment at the hospital. In an interview on [DATE] at 4:13pm with local emergency service staff, he said that he reviewed the 911 call placed on [DATE] between 6:43am-7:00am by RR, and RR was clearly inside of the facility. He said that he may not have all the details correct but he could provide his account of what he remembered hearing. He said that RR said that CR#1 needed to go the hospital due to stomach pain. He said that the dispatcher asked to speak to someone inside of the facility, and RR could be heard asking for someone at the facility to speak with the dispatcher, and staff could beard in the background refusing to get on the phone. He said that the dispatcher told RR that since she was still inside of the facility EMS could not be dispatched and told her she could once she was outside of the facility. He said that there were no calls from the facility or RR from outside of the facility. In an interview on [DATE] at 4:40pm with ADMIN, he said that he spoke with the local emergency service staff about the 911 call. He said that he was not concerned about the call because RR said that CR#1 was having stomach pain and not SOB, as accounted by the staff. He said that he was told that staff was in the background saying that they were handling the situation. In an interview on [DATE] at 10:15am with Medical Director, he said that a resident or responsible party have the right to decline treatment and seek treatment at the hospital. He said that staff should call the physician to provide information on why the resident or responsible party was insisting to go to the hospital and request an order in line to what the resident or responsible party is requesting. He said that when the family is at the bed side, they may see something that staff may not see. He said that he had never heard of a situation when a physician blocked a resident or responsible party from going to the hospital when they are insisting. He said that there should never be a situation where a resident is pushed to the hospital by wheelchair because staff did not obtain an order to send the resident to the hospital by emergency or non-emergency transport when requested. He said that staff should use their best judgement and call 911 to avoid the situation. Record review on [DATE] at 12:22pm of written statement provided by local emergency service staff read in part, .On 18th of February, 2024, at 07:43:03 hrs, our dispatchers in the police department received a 911 call . On the call she states that she wanted to request an ambulance .for CR#1 because he was having some breathing issues and his stomach was hurting. The dispatcher stated that, because her husband was a patient at that medical facility, the staff would have to request us to come and take him to another medical facility. The dispatcher then asked if one of the staff members could maybe speak with her, versus having to call separately requested that t . staff speak with the dispatcher and give permission for the ambulance to come and take her husband (the patient). The staff was heard on the 911 call stating that they would not speak with the 911 dispatcher she was going to take him to the hospital herself and then disconnected the call . In a phone interview on [DATE] at 12:30pm with LVN A, she said CR#1 was alert but had some confusion, and she did not remember anyone asking CR#1 if he wanted to go to the hospital or asking RR if she had legal authority to make decisions. In a phone interview on [DATE] at 12:54pm with CNA F, she said she worked on [DATE] on double shift starting at 2:00pm, and she left at 5:00am on [DATE]. She said that during her shift CR#1 was alert but had some confusion. In an interview on [DATE] at 3:09pm with CNA E, he said that during his shift on [DATE] from 6:00am-10:00pm CR#1 was alert but had some confusion. In an interview on [DATE] at 8:30 am with LVN C, she said when RR and CR#1 were at the front lobby area near entrance there were staff at the nursing station, but she could not recall who. She said that RR was on the phone calling 911, but she did not stick around to hear what was being said. She said CR#1 appeared to be alert, and she did not remember any asking CR#1 what he wanted. In a phone interview on [DATE] at 10:57am with RR, she said that she had dual Power of Attorney (POA) executed to make medical and final decision for CR#1 since 2016. She said that no one at the facility asked if she had a POA. She said that CR#1 did have some confusion, but he was alert and able to talk. She said that no one at the facility asked CR#1 if he wanted to go to the hospital. She said that she was given an admission packet at admission, and it had information on rights and facilities policy procedures. Record review on [DATE] at 1:20pm of dual Power of Attorney (POA) executed to make medical and final decision between CR#1 and RR date [DATE]. Record review on [DATE] at 9:43am of the audio recording of the911 call provided by local city officials. In the call RR could be heard on the call with a dispatcher requesting emergency assistance for CR#1, due to CR#1 being unable to breath and abdominal pain. The dispatcher requested to speak with staff at the facility. RR responded that staff would not help, and staff would not help place CR#1 in her vehicle so that RR could transport to the hospital. The dispatcher explained to RR that emergency services could not be dispatched unless the call came from the facility. RR could be heard asking staff to speak with the dispatcher, staff could be heard saying that they could not speak with dispatcher, and RR could be heard saying that CR#1 would die because staff could not assist and emergency would not be dispatched. The dispatcher was heard explaining to RR that emergency service could not be dispatched without speaking to staff, and RR replied with staff would not speak with dispatcher, RR would push CR#1 to the hospital, they would freeze, and CR#1 would die from pneumonia. In an interview on [DATE] at 12:03pm with LVN W, she said that worked on the morning of [DATE] from 6:00am-2:00pm. She said that heard yelling at the front of the building at lobby. She said that when she approached the nurses' station, she could see CR#1 seated in wheelchair with RR, they were still inside the facility near the nurses station, and the only staff present was LVN C. She said that RR was on the phone with 911 but she did not hear the call from the beginning. She said that RR was asking for EMS, but she guessed the dispatcher was not going to send EMS because she said that, thank you for nothing, she was going to push him to the hospital, if CR#1 got pneumonia and died it would be on everyone, hung up the call, and pushed CR#1 out of the building. She said that LVN C told her that CR#1 was discharging AMA. She said she did not know if RR had legal authority to take CR#1 from the facility. She said that CR#1 appeared to be alert, and LVN C or she asked CR#1 if he wanted to leave the facility to go to the hospital. In a phone interview on [DATE] at 1:02pm with LVN B, she said that CR#1 was alert, but she did not remember asking if he wanted to go to the hospital. She did not remember asking RR if she had the legal authority to make decisions for CR#1. In an interview on [DATE] at 1:22pm with Director of Admission, she said that prior to admission she tries to obtain information on responsible party and if there was a POA. She said that if she receives the POA she files it in her office. She said that she does not have a way to document her efforts prior to admission because there was no chart. She said that if information was not received prior to admission the resident was named their own responsible party until follow up can be made by admission or social worker to confirm. She said that upon admission there was another attempt to get the information. Record review of facility policy titled, Statement of Resident Rights, undated revealed, in part, You, the resident, do not give up any rights when you enter a nursing facility. The facility must encourage and assist you to fully exercise your rights. Any violation of these rights is against the law .You have a right to: 1. All care necessary for you to have the highest possible level of health and welfare; 21. Discharge yourself from the facility unless you have been adjudicated mentally incompetent; Record Review of facility policy titled Discharging a Resident without a Physician's Approval Dated Revised [DATE] revealed, in part, .A physician's order should be obtained for all discharges, unless a resident or representative is discharging himself or herself against medical advise .7. The charge nurse will assist with arranging emergency transport or regular transport as applicable upon resident or representative (sponsor) request Record Review of facility policy titled Transfer or Discharge, Emergency Dated Revised [DATE] revealed, in part, .Policy Statement. Emergency transfers or discharges may be necessary to protect the health and/or well-being of the resident(s). Policy Interpretation and Implementation. 4. Should it become necessary to make an emergency transfer or discharge to a hospital or other related institutions, our facility will implement the following procedures: a. notify the residents attending physician; c. prepare the resident for transfer; f. assist in obtaining transportation; and g. others as appropriate or as necessary Record Review of facility policy titled Transportation, Social Services Dated Revised [DATE] revealed, in part, .Policy Statement. Our facility shall help arrange transportation for residents as needed. 1. Except in emergencies, the resident or his or her representative (sponsor) shall be expected to arrange for transportation This was determined to be an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on [DATE]. The Administrator was notified on [DATE]. The Administrator was provided with the IJ template on [DATE] 5:42pm. The following Plan of Removal submitted by the facility was accepted on [DATE] 9:46 AM. The plan of removal reflected the following: Facility Name: Plan of Removal -The facility failed to arrange emergency transportation to local hospital for CR#1 when requested by the responsible party on [DATE]. What corrective actions have been implemented for the identified residents? F. On [DATE] CR#1 involved in alleged deficient practice was discharged to the hospital against medical advice per(for each) RR's request and did not return to the facility. He was discharged via(by means of) non-emergency services and completed by RR. The attending physician was notified on [DATE] at 7:31 am and this was documented in the resident clinical record. G. On [DATE] at 6:30 pm Administrator notified the Medical Director, and the attending physician of alleged deficient practice. H. Facility auditing the resident's medical record from [DATE] to [DATE] to determine if a POA was listed and the POA was included. Social Workers and Medical Records will be completing the audit, and the completion date is [DATE]. I. Regional [NAME] President reviewed facility policy on [DATE] regarding resident rights and no revisions were deemed necessary. J. On [DATE] LVN A received a 1:1 training on Resident Rights Establishing from the resident if they want to go to the hospital when the POA requests and Assisting residents POA with arranging transportation when they request for the resident to be sent to the hospital. Training was provided by Director of Nursing and Assistant Director of Nursing. K. On [DATE] LVN B received a 1:1 training on Resident Rights Establishing from the resident if they want to go to the hospital when the POA requests and Assisting residents POA with arranging transportation when they request for the resident to be sent to the hospital. Training was provided by Director of Nursing and Assistant Director of Nursing. L. On [DATE] LVN C received a 1:1 training on Resident Rights Establishing from the resident if they want to go to the hospital when the POA requests and Assisting residents POA with arranging transportation when they request for the resident to be sent to the hospital. Training was provided by Director of Nursing and Assistant Director of Nursing. M. On [DATE] LVN D[LVN W] received a 1:1 training on Resident Rights Establishing from the resident if they want to go to the hospital when the POA requests and Assisting residents POA with arranging transportation when they request for the resident to be sent to the hospital. Training was provided by Director of Nursing and Assistant Director of Nursing. How were other residents at risk to be affected by this deficient practice identified? B. All residents have the potential to be affected by the alleged deficient practice. What does the facility need to change immediately to keep residents safe and ensure it does not happen again? D. An in-service was initiated on [DATE] by the Director of Nursing and Nurse Managers with the licensed nursing staff on the Resident Rights Policy. In-service includes, Establishing from the resident if they want to go to the hospital when the POA requests and Assisting residents POA with arranging transportation when they request for the resident to be sent to the hospital. Licensed nurses will not be allowed to return to work until they receive this in-service. Nurses who are unable to physically attend the in-service training in person will be in-serviced via (by means of) phone. The completion date was [DATE]. E. Licensed nursing staff will complete a Resident's Rights Pre/Post Test Competency. Nurses in-serviced over the phone will not be allowed to work until they complete the Resident's Rights Pre/Post Test Competency. The completion date was [DATE]. F. During the in-service training, there will be a discussion. QA to ensure understanding and competency. Learning will be measured by a pre/post-test, nurses who fail will be further educated and/or progressively disciplined as indicated. The completion date was [DATE]. G. An in-service was completed on [DATE] by the Administrator with the Admissions Director, Director of Business Director, and Social Worker on Obtaining the Power of Attorney. The completion date was [DATE]. In-service includes, Requesting a copy of the POA Before Admission. Quality Assurance An impromptu Qua[TRUNCATED]
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Notification of Changes (Tag F0580)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review , the facility failed to consult with the resident's physician; and notify th...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review , the facility failed to consult with the resident's physician; and notify the resident representative for 1 of 10 residents (CR#1) reviewed for change of condition, in that, 1. LVN A failed to immediately notify the physician on [DATE] when CR#1 was observed with diarrhea, and LVN A failed to immediately notify the physician when CR#1 said he was having trouble breathing on [DATE]. CR#1 was admitted to a local hospital on [DATE] and died while in the hospital on [DATE]. 2. The facility failed to establish if CR#1 wanted to the leave the facility to the hospital when requested by the Resident Representative (RR) when he was alert and oriented times four. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on [DATE]. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] 11:27am. While the IJ was removed on [DATE], the facility remained out of compliance due to the facility's need to complete in-service training and evaluate the effectiveness of their corrective systems. These failures could expose residents to low quality of care, worsening of condition, hospitalization, and death. Findings included: Record review of CR#1's face sheet dated, [DATE], reflected he was a [AGE] year-old male, admitted to the facility on [DATE] as his own responsible party with diagnoses of metabolic encephalopathy(chemical imbalance in the blood affecting the brain), sepsis(infection), pneumonia (lung infection), end stage renal disease (kidney failure), pleural effusion (excess fluid affecting the lungs), dyspnea (Shortness of breath), atherosclerotic heart disease (plaque buildup in the arteries of the heart), and atrial fibrillation (irregular heartbeat). CR#1 was discharged on [DATE]. Record review of electronic medical records (EMR) for CR #1 did not reveal progress notes completed by LVN A on [DATE], or Situation, Background, Assessment, and Recommendation (SBAR) completed by LVN A regarding CR#1 change in condition after he expressed having trouble breathing or observed with diarrhea on [DATE]. Record review of physician order summary for CR#1 revealed no orders for anti-diarrhea medication. Record review of CR#1 baseline care plan dated [DATE] with no information to indicate CR#1 admitted with diarrhea. Record review of CR#1 medical records from local hospital with admission date of [DATE] and discharge date of [DATE] revealed in the discharge summary no diagnosis for diarrhea an no orders for anti-diarrhea medication was provided at discharge. Record review of CR#1 medical records from local hospital with admission date of [DATE] with chief complaint of diarrhea and shortness of breath (SOB ). Computed Tomography Scan(CT SCAN a diagnostic imaging procedure) completed of abdomen and pelvis with left free intraperitoneal gas suspicious for perforated hollow viscus (air under the diaphragm suggesting a hole or series in the intestine or bowel) with recommendation for surgical consult. CT SCAN revealed complete collapse of left lower lobe and partial collapse of the right lower lobe. Death summary revealed family declined surgical intervention, made CR#1 do-not-resuscitate (DNR ), and resident transition care to comfort measures only. Resident expired on [DATE] while at the hospital. In an interview on [DATE] at 9:10 am with RR, she said that CR#1 complained of being unable to breath and stomach pain. She said that she did not want to wait four hours while the facility had imaging done. She said that she wheeled CR#1 to a local hospital after facility staff refused to help transfer CR#1 to her vehicle, facility staff refused to help arrange transportation, and she was not able to get assistance with transportation from Emergency Medical Services (EMS) when she contacted 911. In an interview on [DATE] at 2:03pm with CNA E, he said that he worked a double on [DATE] from 6:00am-2:00pm and 2:00pm 10:00pm. He said that he rounded during shift change on second shift with another CNA (name unknown), and CR#1 was observed on the floor of his room. He said that CR#1 had diarrhea. He said that a nurse (name unknown) was alerted who came to assess CR#1. He said that CR#1 said appeared to have normal breathing. He did not know what was done to treat diarrhea. In a phone interview on [DATE] at 2:03pm with CNA F, she said that she worked from 3:20pm on [DATE] to 5:00am on [DATE]. She said that CR#1 complained his stomach was hurting and had diarrhea. She said that CR#1 went to the bathroom approximately four times with diarrhea. She said that the nurse (name unknown) gave CR#1 medication for his stomach, but she was unsure what the name of the medication was. She said that CR#1 did not say he was having trouble breathing. In a phone interview on [DATE] at 3:40am with LVN A, she said that she worked on [DATE] from 10:00pm until 6:00am on [DATE]. She said that at the start of the shift CR#1 was observed with diarrhea, and she gave him over the counter medication, loperamide. She said that CR#1 had two more episodes of diarrhea after the medication was given, and the diarrhea had subsided by the morning of [DATE]. She said that right before shift change, CR#1 said he was having trouble breathing. She said that she observed CR#1 laying down, with breathing unlabored. She said that she checked CR#1 vitals and oxygen saturation was between 96-97. She said that she elevated the head of CR#1. In a phone interview on [DATE] at 12:20pm with Physician, she said that she confirmed that nursing staff did not contact the on-call service or NP when CR#1 had trouble breathing or diarrhea, both would be considered a change in condition and required notification. She said that notification would still be required even if the oxygen saturation was in normal range. She said that notification was completed when CR#1 expressed he was having abdominal pain and after he had a fall. She said that orders would have been provided to address both diarrhea and complaint of having trouble breathing at the same time with the abdominal pain. She said that it was important to have the information since CR#1 had pneumonia and sepsis. She said that based on the information provided orders would have been given for testing and treatment of diarrhea prior to deciding to send CR#1 to the hospital. In a phone interview on [DATE] at 12:45pm with NP, he said that when he was contacted after CR#1 complained of abdominal pain he was not informed there was a concern for diarrhea or with residents breathing. He said that notification would be required if a resident had trouble breathing with an oxygen saturation in range. He said that staff should have provided the information to an on-call physician or when they spoke with him because both incidents are a change in condition. He said that it was important to have the information due to CR#1 diagnosis of pneumonia and sepsis He said that he would have given additional orders for testing and treatment of diarrhea before deciding to send CR#1 to the hospital. In a phone interview on [DATE] at 1:05pm with LVN B, she said that she worked on [DATE] from 6:00am-2:00pm. She said that LVN A, CR#1, or RR had not disclosed to her that CR#1 had diarrhea or trouble with his breathing. She said that both incidents are considered a change in condition. She said that if CR#1 said he had trouble breathing and his oxygen saturation was in normal range it would still be a change in condition. She said that notification should have been made to the physician. She said that if she had been made aware of the change in condition, she would have provided the information to NP when CR#1 expressed he had abdominal pain. In a phone interview on [DATE] at 1:16pm with LVN A, she said that CR#1 never told her that he had trouble breathing and she denied that she had provided the information in a previous interview. She said that a resident expressing they had trouble breathing with oxygen saturation in normal range is not a change of condition and she had no need to complete to a SBAR but the information should have been documented. She said that when CR#1 had diarrhea it was a change in condition, and she did notify the physician to treat the diarrhea. She said that there should have been a progress note and SBAR completed, and if tasks were not completed it, should have been done. In an interview on [DATE] at 2:20pm with DON, she said that if a resident had trouble breathing that would be a change in condition even with a normal range oxygen saturation. She said that the resident's physician should have been notified so that orders to treat the issues could have been provided. She said that without treatment the condition could progress, and the resident may need to be sent to the hospital. She said that when there is a change in condition staff should notify the physician, complete a SBAR, and progress note. In an interview on [DATE] at 2:28pm with CSD, he said that he is a RN with corporate office. He said that if a resident expressed, they had trouble breathing even when the oxygen saturation is in normal range it would be considered a change in condition. He said that the physician should be notified so it could be determined why the resident had trouble breathing, and if the physician was not notified when there was a respiratory issue the resident could end up being sent to the hospital. He said that when there is a change in condition staff should notify the physician, complete a SBAR, and progress note. Record Review of facility policy titled Change in a Resident's Condition or Status Dated Revised [DATE] revealed, in part, Policy Statement. Our facility shall promptly notify the resident, his or her Attending Physician, and representative (sponsor) of changes in the resident's medical/mental condition and/or status (e.g., changes in level of care, billing/payments, resident rights, etc.). Policy Interpretation and Implementation. 1. The nurse will notify the resident's Attending Physician or physician on call when there has been a(an): . d. significant change in the resident's physical/emotional/mental condition; . i. specific instruction to notify the Physician of changes in the resident's condition . This was determined to be an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on [DATE]. The Administrator was notified on [DATE] 11:23am. The Administrator was provided with the IJ template on [DATE] 11:27 am. The following Plan of Removal submitted by the facility was accepted on [DATE] at 6:44pm. The plan of removal reflected the following: Plan of Removal Name of Facility: What corrective actions have been implemented for the identified residents? A. On [DATE] resident CR#1 involved in alleged deficient practice was discharged to the hospital against medical advice per RR's request and did not return to the facility. The attending physician was notified on [DATE] at 7:31 am and this was documented in the resident clinical record. B. On 3/07/ 2024 at 12:16 pm Administrator notified the Medical Director, and the attending physician of alleged deficient practice. C. Nurse Managers completed a 100% respiratory assessment of all residents residing in the facility for respiratory concerns on [DATE], and none were identified. D. Facility auditing the change in conditions from [DATE] to the [DATE] for respiratory concerns and notification to the physician. Nurse Managers will be auditing, and the completion date is [DATE]. E. Clinical Services Director reviewed facility policy on [DATE] regarding notification of physician and no revisions were deemed necessary. How were other residents at risk to be affected by this deficient practice identified? A. All residents have the potential to be affected by the alleged deficient practice. What does the facility need to change immediately to keep residents safe and ensure it does not happen again? A. An in-service was initiated on [DATE] by the Corporate Clinical Service Director and Director of Nursing with the licensed nursing staff to notify the attending physician immediately when a change of condition occurs. In-service includes Report any changes from resident's baseline to the physician. Licensed nurses will not be allowed to return to work until they receive this in-service. The completion date is [DATE]. B. An in-service was initiated on [DATE] by DON and the Administrator with the facility frontline staff, CNAs, housekeeping, dietary, and rehab staff on reporting any changes immediately in resident conditions to the charge nurse. The completion date is [DATE]. C. Newly hired nurses will be in-serviced by the Director of Nursing or designee on immediately notifying the attending physician of patient change of conditions. How will the system be monitored to ensure compliance? A. The 24-hour report will be reviewed daily by the Director of Nursing or designee to audit nurse documentation in progress notes notifying the attending physician of patient change of conditions. Discrepancies noted during reviews will be immediately corrected by contacting the attending physician of the change of condition and completing documentation in the patient's progress note. Further training will be provided as identified by the nurse manager who identified the discrepancy when and if necessary. Review will be documented on an audit report form. B. The DON/designee will review 24-hour report to ensure nurses document timely notification to the attending physician of resident changes of condition 2x week X 6 weeks. Review will be documented on an audit report form. C. Administrator will review the audit reports on a weekly basis to ensure nurse managers are following the plan of correction for six weeks. Review will be documented on an audit report form. Quality Assurance An impromptu Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) review of the plan of removal was completed on [DATE] with the Medical Director. The Medical Director has reviewed and agrees with this plan. The State Surveyor (SS) confirmed the Plan of Removal for the IJ by monitoring from [DATE] through [DATE] as follows: In a phone interview on [DATE] at 10:15am with Medical Director, he said that he participated by phone in a QAPI to discuss change of condition. He said that staff should report any change of condition to the primary physician, nurse practitioner, on call physician, and he can be contacted if other contacts fail. He said that change in condition would include respiratory issues even with normal oxygen saturation and Diarrhea. He said that a failure to report a change to a physician could cause delay in care, exacerbate the condition, require a higher level of care, and cause a resident to need hospitalization. In an interview on [DATE] at 11:26am with DON while MDS Nurse was present. She said that there was not a progress note or SBAR completed to show that CR#1 had diarrhea. If resident had diarrhea. She said that diarrhea would be considered a change in condition if the resident had not admitted with the diagnosis. She reviewed CR#1 admission medical records and admission progress note with no information regarding diarrhea. She reviewed CR#1 physician orders with no orders provided for loperamide. She said that if CR#1 had diarrhea the physician should have been notified for orders on treatment, and medication should not have been given without an order. She said that without the order the nurse would be practicing outside of the scope of a nurse. In an interview on [DATE] at 11:26am with DON while MDS Nurse was present. She said that there was not a progress note or SBAR completed to show that CR#1 had diarrhea. If resident had diarrhea. She said that diarrhea would be considered a change in condition if the resident had not admitted with the diagnosis. She reviewed CR#1 admission medical records and admission progress note with no information regarding diarrhea. She reviewed CR#1 physician orders with no orders provided for loperamide. She said that if CR#1 had diarrhea the physician should have been notified for orders on treatment, and medication should not have been given without an order. She said that without the order the nurse would be practicing outside of the scope of a nurse. In a phone interview on [DATE] at 12:30pm with LVN A , she said she did not notify a physician when CR#1 had diarrhea. She said that she had been trained on change in condition. She said that she gave CR#1 over the counter anti diarrhea medication without a physician order, she did not enter a progress or SBAR, or tell any other staff during shift change that CR#1 had been treated for diarrhea. She said that she got overwhelmed with duties, she forgot to complete the steps, and she had been trained to do so. She said that she meant to call the doctor after she gave the medication, she forgot, and it was stupid mistake. She said that she knew that an order was needed prior to giving any medication. She said that she had been suspended. She said that she practiced outside of her scope as a nurse, could have put CR#1 at risk, and if the physician was contacted, they may have provided different orders. In an interview on [DATE] at 2:48pm with LVN G, she said that she was trained prior to shift on topic, Change in Condition. She defined a change in condition as anything from a resident's baseline. She said that a notification to physician, family, and facility management should be made when there is a change in condition, and progress note, physician orders, and SBAR should be completed in EMR. She said that anyone that was not a RN or LVN were trained to report a change in condition to a nurse immediately and they can document the change on stop and watch a form similar to a SBAR. In an interview on [DATE] at 2:54 pm with RN H, she said that she was trained prior to shift on topic, Change in Condition. She defined a change in condition as anything from a resident's normal behavior or condition. She said that a notification to physician, family, and facility management should be made when there is a change in condition, and progress note, physician orders, and SBAR should be completed in EMR. She said that anyone that was not a RN or LVN were trained to report a change in condition to a nurse immediately and they can document the change on stop and watch a form similar to SBAR. In an interview on [DATE] at 2:58 pm with RN I, she said that she was trained prior to shift on topic, Change in Condition. She defined a change in condition as anything from a resident's baseline. She said that a notification to physician, family, and facility management should be made when there is a change in condition, and progress note, physician orders, and SBAR should be completed in EMR. She said that anyone that was not a RN or LVN were trained to report a change in condition to a nurse immediately and they can document the change on stop and watch a form similar to SBAR. In an interview on [DATE] at 3:00pm with LVN J, she said that she was trained prior to shift on topic, Change in Condition. She defined a change in condition as anything from a resident's baseline. She said that a notification to physician, family, and facility management should be made when there was a change in condition, and progress note, physician orders, and SBAR should be completed in EMR. She said that anyone that was not a RN or LVN were trained to report a change in condition to a nurse immediately and they can document the change on stop and watch a form similar to SBAR. In an interview on [DATE] at 3:03pm with CNA K, she said that she was trained prior to shift on topic, Change in Condition. She defined a change in condition as anything from a resident's normal health or behavior. She said that she was trained that she has to report a change in condition to a nurse immediately. She said that she can document the change on a stop in watch form or complete the documentation in the EMR for the resident. In an interview on [DATE] at 3:06pm with RA L, she said that she was trained prior to shift on topic, Change in Condition. She said that she was trained that she had to report a change in condition to a nurse immediately. She said that she can document the change on a stop in watch form that are located at the nurse station. She defined a change in condition as anything medical, issue or behavior she had not seen the resident to have prior. In an interview and observation on [DATE] at 3:09pm with CNA E, he said that he was trained prior to shift on topic, Change in Condition. He said that he was trained to report a change in condition to a nurse immediately. He said that he can document the change in the EMR, but he was not sure of the name of the form the change is documented on. He demonstrated in the EMR how to complete a new alert for a resident using the stop and watch. He defined a change in condition as a new symptom or behavior he had not been aware of a resident to have prior. In an interview on [DATE] at 3:13pm with COTA, PTA, and SLP, who said that they were trained prior to shift on change in condition, they defined change in condition as change from residents baseline that must be reported immediately to a nurse, and documented on the stop and watch form if staff do not have access to EMR for residents. In an interview on [DATE] at 3:20pm with CNA M, she said that she had not received a training prior to shift 2:00pm-10:00pm. She was not able to define a change in condition, who to report a change to, or how the change would be documented. In an interview and observation on [DATE] at 3:24pm with CNA N, he said that he was trained prior to shift on topic, Change in Condition. He said that he was trained to report a change in condition to a nurse immediately. He said that he can document the change in the EMR on stop and watch. He demonstrated in the EMR how to complete a new alert for a resident using the stop and watch. He defined a change in condition as anything new from a resident's baseline. In an interview on [DATE] at 3:29pm with DON and CSD, both were informed that CNA M denied being trained, and they both said that CNA M had been trained and they would pull CNA M from the floor to provide additional training. In an interview on [DATE] at 3:32pm with LVN O, she said that she was trained prior to shift on topic, Change in Condition. She defined a change in condition as anything from a resident's baseline. She said that a notification to physician, family, and facility management should be made when there was a change in condition, and progress note, physician orders, and SBAR should be completed in EMR. She said that anyone that was not a RN or LVN were trained to report a change in condition to a nurse immediately and they can document the change on stop and watch a form similar to SBAR. In an interview on [DATE] at 4:33pm with CNA P, she said that she was trained prior to shift on topic, Change in Condition. She defined a change in condition as anything from a resident's normal baseline. She said that she was trained that she had to report a change in condition to a nurse immediately. She said that she can document the change on a stop in watch form or complete the documentation in the EMR for the resident under stop and watch. In an interview on [DATE] at 4:35pm with Dietary Manager, she said that she was trained prior to shift on topic, Change in Condition. She said that all staff in dietary had been trained prior to shift. She defined a change in condition as anything from a resident's baseline. She said that she was trained that she had to report a change in condition to a nurse immediately. She said that she can document the change on a stop in watch form and give it to a nurse. In an interview on [DATE] at 4:39pm with RN D, she was not knowledgeable on the topic of change in condition. In an interview on [DATE] at 4:55pm with Cook, she said that she had been trained on abuse and neglect at the start of her shift and there was another topic put she could not recall the name or details of the training. In an interview on [DATE] at 5:00pm with DON, RVP, and CSD, they were made aware that [NAME] and RN D was not knowledgeable of training on change in condition, and they both said that she would be pulled and retained. In an interview on [DATE] at 5:37am with RN Q, he said that he had been trained [DATE] on change in condition. He defined a change in condition as anything out of the baseline. He said that a notification to physician, family, and facility management should be made when there is a change in condition, and progress note, physician orders, and SBAR should be completed in EMR. He said that all other staff were trained to report a change immediately to RN or LVN, and document on stop and watch. In an interview on [DATE] at 5:43am with RN R, she said that she had been trained [DATE] on change in condition. She defined a change in condition as anything out of the baseline. She said that a notification to physician, family, and facility management should be made when there was a change in condition, and progress note, physician orders, and SBAR should be completed in EMR. She said that all other staff were trained to report a change immediately to RN or LVN, and document on stop and watch. In an interview on [DATE] at 5:46am with CNA S, she could not provide information on training on topic of change in condition. In an interview on [DATE] at 6:01am with CNA T, she said that she was trained prior to shift on topic, Change in Condition on [DATE]. She defined a change in condition as anything from a resident's normal condition that was new. She said that she was trained that she had to report a change in condition to a nurse immediately. She said that she can document the change on a stop in watch form or complete the documentation in the EMR for the resident under stop and watch. In an interview on [DATE] at 6:08am with CNA U, she said that she was trained prior to shift on [DATE]. She could not remember name of the training, but she was trained to report changes in the residents health or behavior to a nurse immediately. She said that she can document the change in the EMR or by form that are located at the nurse's station. In an interview on [DATE] at 6:13am with CNA M, she said that she was trained on [DATE] on topic, Change in Condition. She defined a change in condition was any new symptom that a resident did not have before, that could be with health or behavior. She said that she was trained that she had to report a change in condition to a nurse immediately. She said that she can document the change on a stop in watch form or complete the documentation in the EMR for the resident under stop and watch. In an interview on [DATE] at 6:18am with CNA V she said that she was trained on [DATE] on topic, Change in Condition. She defined a change in condition was any unusual or not the normal for a resident's health or behavior. She said that she was trained that she had to report a change in condition to a nurse immediately. She said that she can document the change on a stop in watch form or complete the documentation in the EMR for the resident under stop and watch. In an interview on [DATE] at 7:55am with DON, she was informed of CNA S inability to provide information on the training topic of change in condition. In an interview on [DATE] at 8:47am with Floor Tech, he said that he was trained on [DATE] on change in condition. He defined a change in condition as something he had not observed before with a resident's health or behavior. He said that he had to report the change to a nurse immediately and document it on the stop and watch form. In an interview on [DATE] at 8:54am with Housekeeper, she said that she was trained on [DATE] on change in condition. She defined a change in condition as anything new with a resident's health or behavior. She said that she had to report the change to a nurse immediately and document it on the stop and watch form. In a phone interview on [DATE] at 9:38am with CNA S, she said that she received one on one training on topic change in condition and stop and watch. She defined as change in condition as something new from a resident's baseline. She said that she had to report to a nurse immediately, she could fill out the stop and watch form at the nurse station, but as a CNA she should document in EMR for the resident. In a phone interview on [DATE] at 9:41am with RN D, said that she received a one-on-one training on [DATE] on change in condition. She defined a change in condition as anything out of the resident's normal behavior or medical condition. She said that a notification to physician, family, and facility management should be made when there was a change in condition, and progress note, physician orders, and SBAR should be completed in EMR. She said that all other staff were trained to report a change immediately to RN or LVN. In a phone interview on [DATE] at 9:46am with Cook, she said that she received one on one training on topic change in condition and stop and watch. She defined a change in condition as a resident being sick, looks sick, or change from their behavior that she had not seen before. She said that she had to report to a nurse immediately, she could fill out the stop and watch form at the nurse station. In a phone interview on [DATE] at 9:50am with MDS Nurse, she said that she completed an audit for change in conditions from [DATE] to the [DATE] for respiratory concerns and notification to the physician with concerns identified. She said that she had been trained [DATE] on change in condition. She defined a change in condition as anything out of the baseline. She said that a notification to physician, family, and facility management should be made when there is a change in condition, and progress note, physician orders, and SBAR should be completed in EMR. She said that all other staff were trained to report a change immediately to RN or LVN, and document on stop and watch. In an interview on [DATE] at 8:45am with LVN C, she said that she had been trained [DATE] on change in condition. She defined a change in condition as anything out of the baseline. She said that a notification to physician, family, and facility management should be made when there is a change in condition, and progress note, physician orders, and SBAR should be completed in EMR. She said that all other staff were trained to report a change immediately to RN or LVN, and document on stop and watch. In an interview on [DATE] at 10:57am with RR, she said that she was made aware of CR#1 had diarrhea by CR#1 and nurse at the facility the night of [DATE]. She said that she was told that CR#1 received medication to treat the diarrhea. She said that when she arrived at the facility the morning of [DATE] he no longer complained of diarrhea. Record review of the plan of removal was completed from [DATE] through[DATE]: -In-service training documentations were reviewed with all staff scheduled trained prior to the start of their shift, with no newly hired employees. -Respiratory assessment of all current residents for respiratory concerns completed on [DATE] by unit managers with no issues identified. -Audit on change [TRUNCATED]
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with p...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 (CR #1) out of 10 residents reviewed for quality of care in that: 1-The facility failed to obtain physician orders on [DATE] prior to treating CR#1 with loperamide to treat diarrhea. 2-The facility failed to arrange emergency transportation to local hospital when requested by RR for CR#1 when he expressed having trouble breathing on [DATE] and complained of abdominal pain with diarrhea. CR#1 was wheeled to a local hospital on [DATE] and expired while at the hospital on [DATE]. 3-The facility failed to establish if CR#1 wanted to the leave the facility to the hospital when requested by the Resident Representative (RR) when he was alert and oriented times four. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on [DATE]. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 4:20 pm. While the IJ was removed on [DATE], the facility remained out of compliance due to the facility's need to complete in-service training and evaluate the effectiveness of their corrective systems. These failures could expose residents to low quality of care, worsening of condition, hospitalization, and death. Findings included: Record review of CR#1's face sheet dated, [DATE], reflected he was a [AGE] year-old male, admitted to the facility on [DATE] as his own responsible party with diagnoses of metabolic encephalopathy (chemical imbalance in the blood affecting the brain), sepsis(infection), pneumonia (lung infection), end stage renal disease (kidney failure), pleural effusion (excess fluid affecting the lungs), dyspnea(Shortness of breath), atherosclerotic heart disease(plaque buildup in the arteries of the heart), and atrial fibrillation(irregular heartbeat). CR#1 was discharged on [DATE]. Record review of CR#1 baseline care plan dated [DATE] with no information to indicate CR#1 admitted with diarrhea. Record review of CR#1's entry MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE] reflected an admission date of [DATE]. The MDS assessment indicated CR#1 had a pay source of Medicare and Medicaid was pending. Record review of CR#1's undated physician order summary did not reveal orders for loperamide , used to control and relieve the symptoms of diarrhea. Record review of electronic medical records (EMR) for CR #1 did not reveal progress notes completed, or Situation, Background, Assessment, and Recommendation (SBAR) completed by LVN A regarding CR#1 change in condition after he expressed having trouble breathing or diarrhea on [DATE] to LVN A. Record review of electronic medical records (EMR for CR #1) did not reveal a Situation, Background, Assessment, and Recommendation (SBAR) completed by LVN B regarding CR#1 change in condition after he expressed abdominal pain on [DATE] to LVN B. Record review of CR#1's nursing progress note entered by LVN B dated [DATE] read in part Upon arrival, resident noted saying I'm in pain, I don't know what to do repeatedly. When asked for a specific location of pain, resident touched his abdomen, RR present in room. Writer palpated residents abdomen, upper quadrants hard but non distended (enlarged), lower quadrants soft, non distended. Resident states he has frequent regular bowel movements and 10-6 nurse(LVN A) stated resident had a large bowel movement(bm ) on her shift. Vitals assessed and are all wnl (within normal limits), NP (Nurse Practitioner) notified and gave orders to get STAT Chest XRAYS and KUB. Writer informed residents RR of this information however she refused stating he needs to be seen in the ER immediately. Residents RR dressed resident, transferred him into his wheelchair and rolled him out of the facility. RR informed that by making this call, resident is leaving Against Medical Advice(AMA ). RR begin calling staff members idiots and continued to leave the facility. DON and NP notified. Record review of CR#1 medical records from local hospital with admission date of [DATE] and discharge date of [DATE] revealed in the discharge summary no diagnosis for diarrhea and no orders for loperamide was provided at discharge. Record review of CR#1 medical records from local hospital with admission date of [DATE] with chief complaint of diarrhea and shortness of breath (SOB). Computed Tomography Scan(CT SCAN a diagnostic imaging procedure) completed of abdomen and pelvis with left free intraperitoneal gas suspicious for perforated hollow viscus (air under the diaphragm suggesting a hole or series of holes in the intestine or bowel) with recommendation for surgical consult. CT SCAN revealed complete collapse of left lower lobe and partial collapse of the right lower lobe. Death summary revealed family declined surgical intervention, made CR#1 do-not-resuscitate (DNR), and resident transition care to comfort measures only. Resident expired on [DATE] while at the hospital. In a phone interview on [DATE] at 9:10 am with RR, she said that CR#1 called her on [DATE] at 5:00am saying he could not breath and his stomach hurt bad, so she went to the facility. She said a nurse came into the room when she arrived at the facility, and said she contacted a doctor, he ordered a x-ray that would take 4 hours. She said she told the nurse (name unknown) she could not wait 4 hours because CR#1 could not breathe, and the nurse said that's what the doctor said to do. She said she told the nurse she was taking him to emergency room (ER). She said that she asked nurses at the facility to help put CR#1 in the car, and she was told they were not allowed to help. She called 911 to take CR#1 to the hospital, Emergency Medical Services (EMS) told her that permission was needed to come on private property, she asked a nurse to give EMS permission to come on the property, and she was told they could not give permission. She said that she had to push CR#1 in his wheelchair to the ER (located 0.6 miles from the facility). She said that while at the hospital CR#1 had a CT scan that confirmed a perforated intestine (diagnostic imaging procedure to confirm presences of a hole or series of holes in the intestine or bowel). In an interview on [DATE] at 10:50am with ADMIN, he said he received a called from RR on [DATE], who was upset about policy and procedure regarding leaving against medical advice (AMA) and where responsibility lies. He said CR#1 was at the facility less than 10 hours, and while admitted complained of abdominal pain. He said that stat KUB (X-ray of abdominal area for causes of abdominal pain) and other tests were ordered but RR did not want to wait. He said that RR took CR#1 from the facility AMA, could not get CR#1 in the vehicle, staff explained that once she took resident from the facility help could not be provided. He said that according to the RR she called 911, was told that permission was required to come to the facility, but he had not heard of a dispatcher needing permission to come to the facility before. In an interview on [DATE] at 12:48pm with LVN C, she said that she worked from 6:00am-2:00pm on [DATE] as the treatment nurse. She said that she was going to respond to the call light of CR#1, RR came into the hall as she approached the door, she asked if RR if she needed anything, and RR said she was taking CR#1 to the hospital. She said that she told RR to allow her to get LVN B, the nurse assigned to the hall. She said that she told LVN B that RR wanted to take CR#1 to the hospital, and she went back to her duties. She said that she overheard nursing staff (names unknown) saying that CR#1 was leaving AMA, she did not hear the details why, or if staff offered assistance with transportation. In a phone interview on [DATE] at 12:59pm with LVN B, she said that she worked on [DATE] from 6:00am-2:00pm. She said that at 7:00am RR was at the facility an alerted that CR#1 was having abdominal pain and there was no mention of CR#1 having trouble breathing. She said that she assessed CR#1, his stomach was not distended, his vitals were in normal range, CR#1 said that he had pain in abdomen, RR said she wanted CR#1 to go to the hospital, and she explained to RR that she had to call the doctor first. She said that she called NP, who ordered stat labs and x-ray. She said that she returned to the room of CR#1 who had been dressed and placed in wheelchair by RR, and RR said that she was not willing to wait on labs and she was taking CR#1 to the hospital immediately. She said that she told RR to wait on labs and then they could send CR#1 out to the hospital. She said that she called DON, while RR called 911 as she was taking CR#1 to the front entrance, and she tried to explain that CR#1 would be leaving AMA. She said that RR was still on the phone with 911 as she passed LVN C, RR spoke to LVN C, RR called them idiots, and left the facility with CR#1. She said that RR never asked her for assistance or for her to speak with anyone while on the phone with 911. She said that she did not follow RR and CR#1 outside and she was unsure if other staff followed them. She said that process if resident or family is requesting to go out to the hospital is to notify the physician for order, if physician does not give the order, the family or resident can call 911 themselves. In a phone interview on [DATE] at 1:28pm with NP, he said that he was notified CR #1 was having abdominal pain, orders given for stat x-ray and KUB, but residents family was refusing and wanted to go to the hospital. He said that if a resident or family was wanting to refuse treatment and go the hospital, he would always say send them to the hospital. He said that a resident and family have the right to refuse treatment and go to the hospital. He said that he could not see a situation where he would not give order to send resident to the hospital when requested, by resident or family as long as family has POA (Power of Attorney) and can make decision. In an interview on [DATE] at 2:03pm with CNA E, he said that he worked a double on [DATE] from 6:00am-2:00pm and 2:00pm 10:00pm. He said that he rounded during shift change on second shift with another CNA (name unknown), and CR#1 was observed on the floor of his room. He said that CR#1 had diarrhea. He said that a nurse (name unknown) was alerted who came to assess CR#1. He said that CR#1 said appeared to have normal breathing. He did not know what was done to treat diarrhea. He said that worked 6:00am-2:00pm on [DATE]. He said that he was running late to work, and it was approximately 7:00am when he saw CR#1 being pushed in a wheelchair by RR towards the hospital. He said that he reported what he saw to the DON when got to the facility. In a phone interview on [DATE] at 2:03pm with CNA F, she said that she worked from 3:20pm on [DATE] to 5:00am on [DATE]. She said that CR#1 complained his stomach was hurting and had diarrhea. She said that CR#1 went to the bathroom approximately four times with diarrhea. She said that the nurse (name unknown) gave CR#1 medication for his stomach, but she was unsure what the name of the medication was. She said that CR#1 did not say he was having trouble breathing. In a phone interview on [DATE] at 3:40am with LVN A, she said that she worked on [DATE] from 10:00pm until 6:00am on [DATE]. She said that at the start of the shift CR#1 was observed with diarrhea, and she gave him over the counter medication, loperamide. She said that CR#1 had two more episodes of diarrhea after the medication was given, and the diarrhea had subsided by the morning of [DATE]. She said that right before shift change, CR#1 said he was having trouble breathing. She said that she observed CR#1 laying down, with breathing unlabored. She said that she checked CR#1 vitals and oxygen saturation was between 96-97. She said that she elevated the head of CR#1. She said that during shift change RR complained that the abdomen of CR#1 looked distended while she was giving report at the end of her shift. She said that three were two other nurses (names unknown) present to assess CR#1. She said that his stomach did not appear to be distended but RR wanted CR#1 to go to the hospital. She said that they tried explaining that it was not the facility protocol to send resident to the hospital without order from doctor and the doctor may request labs first. She said that another nurse in the room told RR that she could call 911. She said that RR wheeled CR#1 out of the facility. In an interview on [DATE] at 4:16pm with DON , she said that she started at the facility in January of 2024. She said that she was told that the RR of CR#1 signed him out AMA and took him to the hospital. She said that staff told her they saw RR pushing CR#1 to the hospital. She said that there were calls to the facility with concerns that two residents had eloped because they were seen walking to the hospital. She said that RR spoke to ADMIN and said that she called 911, but EMS was not dispatched because they needed permission to come on the property. She said that she did an in-service (training) after the incident because it was bad for optics and concerns for customer service after the facility received calls with concerns that two residents had eloped and were seen walking down the street. She said that a resident or family can refuse treatment and request to be sent to the hospital. She said that staff should consider if resident was able to speak for themselves when the request was made by family. She said that staff should contact the doctor because a resident cannot be discharged or transferred without an order from the doctor, or it was considered AMA. She said that if staff tell a doctor that family or resident wanted to go the hospital and the physician says to let them go that was not AMA. She said that resident and family have the right to call 911, remain inside of the facility and wait on EMS to arrive. She said that staff should speak with 911 dispatcher if requested. She said that staff are not able to assist with transferring a resident into a personal vehicle after leaving AMA because the resident and family have taken responsibility at that time. In a follow up interview on [DATE] at 11:47am with LVN C, she said that she was nowhere near RR and CR#1 while RR was on the 911 call. She said that she was never asked to speak with 911 dispatcher, and he was not asked to help transfer CR#1 into the vehicle of RR so that he could be taken to the hospital. She said that she never entered the room of CR#1 and she only saw him briefly from the hallway. She said that CR#1 appeared to have normal breathing, she was not aware of CR#1 to have diarrhea or abdominal pain. She said that if a resident or family member were refusing treatment and requested resident transferred to the hospital she would explain to the family the steps she needed to take first, which included assessment of resident, followed by contacting the physician to provide information of the assessment and get order to send the resident to the hospital in the way requested by resident or family to avoid discharging AMA. She said that she has never had a physician refuse to provide the order to transfer to the hospital to avoid discharging AMA. She said if a resident or family were speaking with 911 dispatcher and to help with transfer she would speak with dispatcher if requested. She said that she had been trained that if a resident has discharged AMA, staff cannot help with transfers to get them in the car, but no other training was provided about what to do after. She said that she would help transfer to the car even though she was trained not to ensure the resident made it safely inside the car. In a phone interview on [DATE] at 12:20pm with Physician, she said that a resident or responsible party have the right to refuse treatment and request transfer to hospital, and she has never not provided an order to transfer a resident when requested. She said that if a resident discharged AMA she would expect the facility to follow their policy. She said if a resident discharged AMA and there was a concern with their safety during the discharged , she would give an order to send the resident to the hospital by 911. She said that a resident being pushed to the hospital by a relative would be considered unsafe. In a phone interview on [DATE] at 1:05pm with LVN B, she said that she worked on [DATE] from 6:00am-2:00pm. She said that LVN A, CR#1, or RR had not disclosed to her that CR#1 had diarrhea or trouble with his breathing. She said that both incidents are considered a change in condition. She said that notification should have been made to the physician. She said that if she had been made aware of the change in condition, she would have provided the information to NP when CR#1 expressed he had abdominal pain. She said that RR left the facility with CR#1 before she could give her the discharge AMA documents, she left before she had a chance to do anything. She said that she did not follow RR and CR#1 to the front of the building or outside of the facility. She said RR did not ask her to speak with 911 or for assistance with getting CR#1 into her vehicle. She said that she had been trained that staff could not help with transferring to a vehicle. She said that there had been no training on what step should be taken after a resident was outside of the facility during a discharge AMA. In a phone interview on [DATE] at 1:16pm with LVN A, she said that CR#1 never told her that he had trouble breathing and she denied that she had provided the information in a previous interview. She said that a resident expressing they had trouble breathing with oxygen saturation in normal range is not a change of condition and she had no need to complete to a SBAR but the information should have been documented. She said that when CR#1 had diarrhea it was a change in condition, and she did notify the physician to treat the diarrhea. She said that there should have been a progress note and SBAR completed, and if tasks were not completed it, should have been done. She said that both LVN B and LVN C were present in the room when CR#1 was assessed for abdominal pain, but she did not remember if it was LVN B or LVN C that told RR to call 911. She said RR did not ask her to speak with 911 or for assistance with getting CR#1 into her vehicle. She said that she had been trained that staff could not help with transferring to a vehicle. She said that there had been no training on what step should be taken after a resident is outside of the facility during a discharge AMA. In an interview on [DATE] at 2:03pm with RN I, she said that did not work on [DATE] but she knew that State Survey Agency (SSA) was investigating CR#1 being pushed in a wheelchair to the hospital by RR. She said that if she had been on duty the situation would not have gotten that far because she would have assessed resident, called the physician, and asked for order to send CR#1 to the hospital by 911 or scheduled transport depending on RR request. She said there has never been situation that a physician declined the order. She said that she would have done what every was necessary to prevent the family from walking to the hospital because that was not safe. She said there had been no training about what step should be taken in a situation like what happened to CR#1, only that you provide care while in facility and cannot help with transferring the resident into a vehicle once the leave the facility. She said although she had not been trained to do so, she would have followed CR#1 and RR to parking lot to ensure she was going to be able to transfer the resident safely to the vehicle. She said that if she observed the transfer to be unsafe, RR was unable to get CR#1 in the car or started walking with CR#1 she would have called 911, followed by DON, Administrator, and physician. In an interview on [DATE] at 2:28pm CSD said that he was a RN with corporate office. He was not made aware of situation with CR#1 being discharged AMA. He said that if a resident or responsible party requested to have a resident sent to the hospital the nurse should first ask to assess the resident so that notification could be made to the physician. He said that the physician may give orders for treatment prior to the order to go the hospital. He said that if the resident or responsible party are not in agreement with treatment then the nurse should call the physician and give information to physician for order of emergency or non emergency transportation to the hospital based on what resident or responsible party wanted. He said that if a physician declines to provide the order the family could be educated on calling 911 but staff should be available to assist. He said if the decision is to discharge AMA, care is still provided while inside of the facility. He said that staff are not able to help transfer a resident to vehicle because the facility can be liable if something happened during the transfer once outside of the facility. He said that staff should be contacting the DON or ADMIN when there is a discharge AMA for instructions. In an interview on [DATE] at 3:04pm with RVP, she said that she was not made aware of situation with CR#1 being discharged AMA. She said that if a resident or responsible party was requesting to be sent to the hospital, staff should notify the physician for an order to send the resident based on the request by emergency or non-emergency transport. She said that a resident or responsible party have the right to decline treatment and seek treatment at the hospital. In an interview on [DATE] at 4:13pm with local emergency service staff, he said that he reviewed the 911 call placed on [DATE] between 6:43am-7:00am by RR, and RR was clearly inside of the facility. He said that he may not have all the details correct but he could provide his account of what he remembered hearing. He said that RR said that CR#1 needed to go the hospital due to stomach pain. He said that the dispatcher asked to speak to someone inside of the facility, and RR could be heard asking for someone at the facility to speak with the dispatcher, and staff could beard in the background refusing to get on the phone. He said that the dispatcher told RR that since she was still inside of the facility EMS could not be dispatched and told her she could once she was outside of the facility. He said that there were no calls from the facility or RR from outside of the facility. In an interview on [DATE] at 4:40pm with ADMIN, he said that he spoke with the local emergency service staff about the 911 call. He said that he was not concerned about the call because RR said that CR#1 was having stomach pain and not SOB, as accounted by the staff. He said that he was told that staff was in the background saying that they were handling the situation. In an interview on [DATE] at 9:40am with DON and ADMIN present. She said that any medication that was given to a resident must have a physician order prior to administering the medication. She said that the facility does have over the counter medication in stock. She said that she did not know if the facility had standing orders for over-the-counter medications, but she would find out. In an interview on [DATE] at 10:15am with Medical Director, he said that a physician order must be obtained prior to administering the medication to include over the counter medication. He said that if staff provided a medication without an order the staff would be practicing outside of their scope as a nurse. He said that the risk to a resident could be adverse reaction to the medication, may require further treatment, or being sent to the hospital. He said that a resident or responsible party have the right to decline treatment and seek treatment at the hospital. He said that staff should call the physician to provide information on why the resident or responsible party is insisting to go to the hospital and request an order in line to what the resident or responsible party is requesting. He said that when the family is at the bed side, they may see something that staff may not see. He said that he had never heard of a situation when a physician blocked a resident or responsible party from going to the hospital when they are insisting. He said that there should never be a situation where a resident is pushed to the hospital by wheelchair because staff did not obtain an order to send the resident to the hospital by emergency or non-emergency transport when requested. He said that staff should use their best judgement and call 911 to avoid the situation. Interview on [DATE] at 11:08am with DON, she said that the facility does not have standing orders for medications and all medications require an order. She said that she was unsure if they had loperamide in stock for over-the-counter medication but she would find out. In an interview on [DATE] at 11:20am with DON, she said that the facility did have the over-the-counter medication loperamide that is used to treat diarrhea, and she provided an unopened box to view. She said that she was unsure of how to view medication orders on a discharged resident, but she would find out. In an interview on [DATE] at 11:26am with DON while MDS Nurse was present said that there was not a progress note or SBAR completed to show that CR#1 had diarrhea. If resident had diarrhea. She said that diarrhea would be considered a change in condition if the resident had not admitted with the diagnosis. She reviewed CR#1 admission medical records and admission progress note with no information regarding diarrhea. She reviewed CR#1 physician orders with no orders provided for loperamide. She said that if CR#1 had diarrhea the physician should have been notified for orders on treatment, and medication should not have been given without an order. She said that without the order the nurse would be practicing outside of the scope of a nurse. She said that nursing staff never provided information that CR#1 was treated for diarrhea and the information was new to her. Record review on [DATE] at 12:22pm of written statement provided by local emergency service staff read in part, .On 18th of February, 2024, at 07:43:03 hrs, our dispatchers in the police department received a 911 call . On the call she states that she wanted to request an ambulance .for CR#1 because he was having some breathing issues and his stomach was hurting. The dispatcher stated that, because her husband was a patient at that medical facility, the staff would have to request us to come and take him to another medical facility. The dispatcher then asked if one of the staff members could maybe speak with her, versus having to call separately requested that t . staff speak with the dispatcher and give permission for the ambulance to come and take her husband (the patient). The staff was heard on the 911 call stating that they would not speak with the 911 dispatcher she was going to take him to the hospital herself and then disconnected the call . In a phone interview on [DATE] at 12:30pm with LVN A, she said she did not notify a physician when CR#1 had diarrhea. She said that she gave CR#1 over the counter anti diarrhea medication without a physician order, she did not enter a progress or SBAR, or tell any other staff during shift change that CR#1 had been treated for diarrhea. She said that she got overwhelmed with duties and she forgot to complete the steps. She said that she meant to call the doctor after she gave the medication, she forgot, and it was stupid mistake. She said that she knew that an order was needed prior to giving any medication. She said that she had been suspended. She said that she practiced outside of her scope as a nurse, could have put CR#1 at risk, and if the physician was contacted, they may have provided different orders. Record Review of facility policy titled Administering Medications Dated Revised [DATE] revealed, in part, Policy Statement. Medications shall be administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. Policy Interpretation and Implementation. 3.Medications must be administered in accordance with the orders, including any required time frame . Record Review of facility policy titled Discharging a Resident without a Physician's Approval Dated Revised [DATE] revealed, in part, .A physician's order should be obtained for all discharges, unless a resident or representative is discharging himself or herself against medical advise . Record Review of facility policy titled Transfer or Discharge, Emergency Dated Revised [DATE] revealed, in part, .Policy Statement. Emergency transfers or discharges may be necessary to protect the health and/or well-being of the resident(s). Policy Interpretation and Implementation. 4. Should it become necessary to make an emergency transfer or discharge to a hospital or other related institutions, our facility will implement the following procedures: a. notify the residents attending physician; c. prepare the resident for transfer; f. assist in obtaining transportation; and g. others as appropriate or as necessary Record Review of facility policy titled Transportation, Social Services Dated Revised [DATE] revealed, in part, .Policy Statement. Our facility shall help arrange transportation for residents as needed. 1. Except in emergencies, the resident or his or her representative (sponsor) shall be expected to arrange for transportation This was determined to be an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on [DATE]. The Administrator was notified on [DATE]. The Administrator was provided with the IJ template on [DATE] 4:17pm. The following Plan of Removal submitted by the facility was accepted on [DATE] 1:19pm. The plan of removal reflected the following: Facility Name: Plan of Removal -The facility failed to obtain physician orders on [DATE] prior to treating CR#1 with loperamide to treat diarrhea. -The facility failed to arrange emergency transportation to local hospital for CR#1 when requested by family on [DATE]. What corrective actions have been implemented for the identified residents? A. On [DATE] resident CR#1 involved in alleged deficient practice was discharged to the hospital against medical advice per R R's request and did not return to the facility. The attending physician was notified on [DATE] at 7:31 am and this was documented in the resident clinical record. B. On [DATE] at 5:00 pm Administrator notified the Medical Director, and the attending physician of alleged deficient practice. C. On [DATE] LVN A was in-serviced on Notifying the Physician Immediately of Change of Condition Occurs and Obtaining Orders from the Physician before Treating the Resident. D. On [DATE] LVN A was suspended on [DATE] pending investigation due to investigation findings. E. On [DATE] LVN B was in-serviced on Assisting Residents/RR with Arranging Emergency Transportation Upon Request. F. Clinical Services Director reviewed facility policy on [DATE] regarding notification of physician and no revisions were deemed necessary. G. Clinical Services Director reviewed facility policy on [DATE] regarding administering medications and no revisions were deemed necessary. H. Clinical Services Director reviewed facility policy on [DATE] regarding discharging a resident without a physician's approval and revisions were made. Summary of revision: The Administrator and Director of
Nov 2023 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Respiratory Care (Tag F0695)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care is p...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care is provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 (Resident #2) of 5 residents reviewed for respiratory care. -The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's physician orders for oxygen administration were being followed. This failure placed residents who received oxygen therapy at risk of for inadequate or inappropriate amounts of oxygen delivery and ineffective treatment. The findings included: Record review of Resident #2's admission Record, dated 11/08/2023, revealed a [AGE] year-old male who was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident's diagnoses included rhabdomyolysis (breakdown of damaged skeletal muscle), malignant neoplasm (cancer) of connective and soft tissue of right lower limb including hip, acute on chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure, and obstructive sleep apnea (sleep disorder in which breathing repeatedly stops and starts). Record review of Resident #2's care plan, undated, revealed he had oxygen therapy that was to be administered as ordered. Record review of Resident #2's MDS assessment, dated 10/14/2023, revealed a BIMS score of 13, indicating cognition was intact. Further review indicated the resident was on oxygen therapy. Record review of Resident #2's physician orders, undated, reflected in part .O2: O2 at 2L/minute via nasal cannula continuously, every shift, start date 10/08/2023 . Observation on 11/08/2023 at 10:20 a.m. revealed Resident #2 was asleep in bed. Resident had oxygen via nasal cannula in place and was set at 3L per minute. Observation and interview on 11/08/2023 at 3:15 p.m., Nurse A checked Resident #2's O2 setting and said it was set to 3L/minute. She said she believed the order was for 2L/minute. She said she was responsible for checking the O2 setting on her shift. Nurse A checked the physician order in the computer system and said the O2 order was for 2L per minute. She said the resident was on hospice and was seen at approximately 2:10 p.m. today by the Hospice Nurse. In a follow-up interview on 11/08/2023 at 3:32 p.m., Nurse A said she had been working at the facility for approximately one month. She said she was working the 2 p.m. to 10 p.m. shift. She said her job responsibilities included checking and setting the O2 liters on the machines. She said Nurse B worked the morning shift and told her the Hospice Nurse changed Resident #2's O2 order today and increased it to 3L/minute. In an interview on 11/08/2023 at 3:40 p.m., Nurse B said she had been working at the facility for approximately 2 years and a few months. She said her job responsibilities included checking O2 settings and entering physician orders into the computer system. She said the Hospice Nurse came to the facility shortly after 12 p.m. today and assessed Resident #2. She said the Hospice Nurse changed Resident #2's O2 setting to 3L/minute. She said the hospice nurse gave a verbal order to increase Resident #2's O2 L/minute. In a telephone interview on 11/08/2023 at 4:13 p.m., the Hospice Nurse said she saw Resident #2 today between 1:00 p.m. and 1:30 p.m. She said she turned up the O2 liters on his machine to 3L/minute and reported it to LVN B. She said she told LVN B to report the change to Resident #2's doctor. Record review of the facility's Administering Medications policy, revised 12/2012, read in part .3. Medications must be administered in accordance with the orders, including any required time frame .
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0919 (Tag F0919)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to be adequately equipped to allow residents to call for...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to be adequately equipped to allow residents to call for staff assistance through a communication system which relays the call directly to a staff member or to a centralized staff work area from each resident's bedside for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed for resident call system. -The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's call light was in working order. This failure could have placed residents at risk of not receiving assistance when needed. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's admission Record, dated 11/14/2023, revealed a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident's diagnoses included metabolic encephalopathy (a condition in which brain function is disturbed due to different diseases or toxins in the body), acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (condition where the lungs cannot provide enough oxygen to the blood), type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia (high blood sugar), end stage renal disease (kidney failure), and acquired absence (loss or amputation) of right leg below knee Record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 10/17/2023, revealed a BIMS score of 11, indicating cognition was moderately impaired. Record review of Resident #1's care plan, undated, revealed she exhibited an ADL self-care performance deficit. Resident required as needed assistance with toileting, bathing, and eating. Further review revealed resident was a moderate risk for falls related to a balance problem. Interventions included encouraging resident to use call light for assistance as needed. Observation and interview on 11/14/2023 at 12:55 p.m., Resident #1 was in her room lying in bed. She said her call light sometimes worked, at other times did not work, and said it was a daily problem. The resident pushed her call light, and the light did not turn on. The resident pushed her call light again and the light did not turn on. Observation on 11/14/2023 at 1:53 p.m., Resident #1 pushed her call light, and it did not turn on. Observation on 11/14/2023 at 1:57 p.m., Nurse C pushed Resident #1's call light and the light turned on. She turned off the call light, pushed it again, and the light did not turn on. She said she did not know the call light was not working correctly and that the resident had not mentioned to her that the call light was not working properly. In an interview on 11/14/2023 at 2:05 p.m., the Maintenance Director said he had been working at the facility for approximately 2 years. He said his job responsibilities included checking and ensuring call lights worked. He said call lights were checked monthly. He said he was not aware Resident #1's call light was not working properly. He said staff never reported the issue to him verbally and/or submitted a work order. He said a non-working call light could pose a great risk to residents who require assistance with their care. He said he wanted all call lights to work at all times. Record review of the facility's Work Orders, Maintenance, revised 04/2010, read in part .1 .work orders must be filled out and forwarded to the Maintenance Director. 2. It shall be the responsibility of the department directors, charge nurse and/or certified staff to fill out and forward such work orders to the Maintenance Director through the TELS system. 3. Department managers, charge nurses, and certified staff have access to submit work orders .
Nov 2023 3 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in a...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice and the residents' choices for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #76) reviewed for quality of care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #76 was assessed by a licensed nurse in a timely manner when she began to show signs and symptoms of hypoglycemia (low blood sugar). CNA K reported the hypoglycemic episode to RN A, who did not respond to the incident. CNA K provided Resident #76 with juice and sugar packets and the resident was not assessed until the following shift, approximately 1 hour later. This failure could place residents at risk of hospitalization. Findings include: Record review of Resident #76's face sheet dated 11/2/2023 revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, hypoglycemia, weakness, injury of the head, morbid obesity, heart failure, and acute kidney failure. Record review of Resident #76's 5-day MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 15 out of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment. She required extensive assistance with ADL care. Record review of Resident #76's care plan initiated on 9/15/23 revealed her diabetes diagnosis and insulin medication were not care planned. Record review of Resident #76's physician orders included the following: -Insulin glargine-yfgn 100 unit/mL inject 32 units two times a day, hold for blood sugar less than 100, order date 10/20/23. -Admelog Solostar 100 unit/mL inject 20 units before meals, hold for blood sugars less than 130 and call MD, order date 9/29/23. Record review of Resident #76's Medication Administration Record for October 2023 revealed Admelog Solostar was documented as administered on 10/29/23 at 4:30 p.m. by (RN A). The blood sugar was documented as 168. Insulin Glargine-yfgn was documented as administered on 10/29/23 at HS by (RN A). The blood sugar was recorded as 195. Record review of Resident #76's blood sugar summary, documented by RN A, revealed her blood sugar was 168 mg/dL on 10/29/23 at 4:09 p.m. and 195 mg/dL on 10/29/23 at 7:09 p.m. In an interview on 10/31/23 at 10:35 a.m., Resident #76 said on Sunday night (10/29/23) a new nurse (RN A) on the 2 p.m. - 10 p.m. shift gave her short acting insulin. She said she crashed, had shakes, and was sweating. She said she pushed the call light and told CNA K that her sugar was dropping. She said CNA K left the room and told RN A. CNA K returned to the room and said the nurse did not say anything. Resident #76 asked CNA K to bring her 2 packs of sugar and cranberry juice. She said she drank the juice and sugar and felt better. She said later the 10 p.m. - 6 a.m. nurse, LVN B, checked her blood sugar and it was normal. She said RN A did not do anything and did not come down to see her. She said she had been diabetic for over 20 years and the short acting insulin caused her to crash quickly. In an interview on 11/2/23 at 11:43 a.m. Resident #76's MD said the facility did not report any hypoglycemic episodes to her regarding Resident #76. She said Resident #76 told her on Tuesday (10/31/23) that she took the short acting insulin, did not really eat, and had to drink juice. She said the resident could pass out if she did not receive juice or sugar. In an interview on 11/2/23 at 2:20 p.m., CNA K said around Monday (10/30/23) at approximately 8 p.m. Resident #76 told her that her blood sugar was dropping. She said Resident #76 was out breath, tired, slumped over, had slurred speech and was not like herself. She said she felt it was an immediate situation. CNA K said she left the room and told RN A and the nurse replied ok and did not do anything. CNA K said she went to the kitchen and got 2 cups of juice and 2 packs of sugar and took them to Resident #76. She said she told RN A that she was bringing the items down to Resident #76 and that she needed to go and check on her. She said RN A never checked the blood sugar before or after the incident. She said RN A was asleep and another nurse had to wake her up. CNA K said she brought the juices and sugar to Resident #76, and she drank one juice and the sugar and started to feel better. She said she reported the incident to the nurse on the next shift, LVN S. She said she also reported it to LVN E and the medication aide who worked 2-10 p.m. She said abuse and neglect should be reported to the nurse, DON, and to the Administrator. She said she did not report the incident to any other nurse because she was in panic mode and was not thinking. In a telephone interview on 11/2/23 at 3:28 p.m., LVN S said on Sunday (10/29/23) CNA K reported to her that an unknown resident's blood sugar was low, and that CNA K reported it to RN A but was unsure what the nurse (RN A) did or did not do. LVN S said she reported it to LVN B. In a telephone interview on 11/2/23 at 3:37 p.m., LVN B said when she arrived to work on Sunday night (10/29/23, 10 p.m. - 6 a.m. shift) LVN S told her to go check on Resident #76. She said she assessed Resident #76, and her blood sugar was 190 or 195. She said Resident #76 told her that her blood sugar dropped earlier, and the previous nurse did not check on her. LVN B said she gave the resident crackers and juice to have overnight. LVN B said RN A did not say anything about Resident #76's blood sugar during change of shift report. In a telephone interview on 11/2/23 at 3:41 p.m., RN A said she worked with Resident #76 on 10/29/23 and did not have any concerns with the resident during her shift. She said she gave Resident #76 insulin twice during her shift, one was long acting and the other was short acting. She said Resident #76 did not have any hypoglycemic episodes that she knew of. She said no aides reported anything to her regarding Resident #76. She said she was unaware if an aide gave juice or sugar to a resident and if so, the aides did not tell the nurse. She said Resident #76 would sometimes refuse her short acting insulin because it would make her feel bad. She said she did not doze off at the nursing station. In an interview on 11/2/23 at 5:16 p.m., the DON said she was just notified of the incident with Resident #76. She said CNA K did not report it to her at the time and did not tell anyone else. She said she expected the nurse to get up and go see about the resident because she could go into a coma. She said the nurse should have completed a hypoglycemic assessment and notified the MD. She said LVN E reported to her on Monday 10/30/23 that RN A dozed off at the nursing station. She said she provided a one-to-one in-service with her. In an interview on 11/2/23 at 5:42 p.m., the Administrator said he just learned of the incident with Resident #76. He said CNA K did not report it to anyone. He said the facility started in-services staff on calling the DON or Administrator if the nurse does not react. He said RN A had been written up previously and was about to be termed due to previous concerns including lack of knowledge. In a telephone interview on 11/3/23 at 10:52 a.m., the NP said Resident #76's blood sugar ranged from 80-200. He said the resident would often refuse her insulin because she felt her blood sugar would drop. He said he had not seen or heard of a hypoglycemic episode with Resident #76. In an interview on 11/3/23 at 11:54 a.m., the Administrator said CNA K should have called the DON and reported the concern about Resident #76 to other nurses. He said she should not have waited to the end of the shift because it could lead to something serious. He said there was a gap when the facility was not responsive to Resident #76. In an telephone interview on 11/3/23 at 4:46 p.m., RN A said the facility fired her. Record review of RN A's 1 on 1 In-service Record dated 10/30/23 revealed the in-service topic: no sleeping while on clock. The nurse voiced understanding. The in-service was signed by the DON, RN A, and the Unit Manager. Record review of the facility's Insulin Administration policy dated April 2007 read in part, . Reporting: 2. Notify the physician if the resident has signs and symptoms of hypoglycemia that are not resolved by following the facility protocol for hypoglycemia management . Record review of the facility's Nursing Care of the Resident with Diabetes Mellitus policy dated April 2009 read in part, .3. Hypoglycemia (blood sugar below reference ranges). Signs and symptoms of hypoglycemia usually have a sudden onset and may include the following: a. weakness, dizziness, or faintness; b. restlessness and/or muscle twitching; e. excessive perspiration; . i. numbness of the tongue and lips/thick speech; j. stupor, unconsciousness and/or convulsions; and coma. If these, or other abnormal conditions exist, notify the physician (for hypoglycemia, follow steps in Management of Hypoglycemia below) . Management of Hypoglycemia . 3. For symptomatic (lethargic, drowsy) but responsive (conscious) residents with hypoglycemia (<70 mg/dl or less than the physician-ordered parameter): a 1. Immediately give the resident an oral form of rapidly absorbed glucose (4 oz juice or 5-6 ounces of soda); 2. Recheck blood glucose in 15 minutes; 3. Repeat juice if indicated, recheck blood glucose in 15 minutes. Record review of the facility's Change in a Resident's Condition policy dated April 2007 read in part, .The Nurse Supervisor/Charge Nurse will notify the resident's Attending Physician or On-Call Physician when there has been a. an accident or incident involving the resident .
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0760 (Tag F0760)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Deficiency Text Not Available

Read full inspector narrative →
Deficiency Text Not Available
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0925 (Tag F0925)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program so that ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program so that it remains free of pests for 1 (Resident #53) of 24 residents and one area (The Conference Room) reviewed for pests. -The facility failed to ensure the building was free of cockroaches and fruit flies. These failures could put residents at risk of, infection, allergies, skin irritation, unsanitary living conditions and decline in health and well-being. Findings include: Resident #53 Record review of Resident #53's face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and originally admitted on [DATE]. His diagnosis included diabetes, paralysis to left side of body following a stroke, malnutrition, memory deficit, narrowing of the arteries, bipolar disorder (a mental disorder), dementia, delusional disorders, age related cognitive decline, elevated blood pressure and progressive lung disease. Record review of Resident #53's annual MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 11 out of 15 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Section E revealed he had behaviors of rejecting care. Section G revealed he required extensive assistance with personal hygiene and supervision for eating and toilet use. Record review of Resident #53's undated care plan included: Focus - Resident #53 had ADL Self Care Performance Deficit r/t communication problems, inappropriate behavior, resistive behavior, dementia, incontinent episodes, unsteady gait, poor balance, and weakness. Goal - Will be cleaned, well-groomed, appropriately dressed through next review date. Interventions included - Eating: The resident requires supervision/set up help by staff participation to eat. During an observation and interview on 10/31/2023 at 3:20PM, Resident #53 room was at the end of 100 Hall. He was side lying in bed. There was a meal tray on the overbed table next to the bed. There were at least five large fruit flies on the uncovered bowl of sliced fruit. There were more fruit flies scattered on the empty dinner plate. Resident #53 did not say anything when he was told there were fruit flies. Resident #53 raised himself up and looked at the tray then lowered himself back on the bed. During an observation on 11/01/2023 at 12:30 PM, there was one live small cockroach found in the Conference Room on the carpeted floor. During an interview on 11/01/2023 at 2:00 PM, the DON stated the Maintenance Director was responsible to check for pests. The DON stated the facility has had cockroaches in the building and if problems persist with pests in a particular room, the resident would be removed and the whole room would be cleaned. The DON stated the meal trays from resident rooms are picked up by nursing staff once the residents have completed the meal. The DON stated some residents eat slowly and expected that when CNAs do their rounds, within an hour of finishing the meal they trays would be picked up. When asked about the fruit flies on Resident #53's tray the DON stated, she was not aware of it and the tray should have been picked up when he was done eating. During an interview on 11/03/2023 at 3:10 PM, the Maintenance Director stated pests have been an issue since he started working at the facility 2 years ago. He stated cockroaches have been in the building off and on and that it was a seasonal thing. He stated that pest control services come once a month or as needed and that it was important for infection control reasons. He stated that cockroaches were a nuisance and carry diseases. He stated for pests such as cockroaches and fruit flies, the pest control service technician would make recommendations such as: do not leave food out in the open and to keep food covered. During an interview on 11/05/2023 at 11:45 AM, LVN L stated she was in charge of 100 Hall. LVN L stated she would not wait for a CNA to clean up messes in resident rooms. She stated it was important to do so to keep bugs away and reduce germs when the resident eats in his room. She stated Resident #53 was very messy and so it was important to clean up as soon as possible. LVN L stated she did not know if Resident #53 had ever requested to leave a tray in the room. She stated she had not seen any bugs in his room and had not been in his room yet. When asked about the fruit flies that were found on Resident #53's tray, LVN L stated trays should be picked up after the resident was done with the meal. LVN L stated keeping food out of the room will keep bugs away as germs may get onto the food and the resident could get sick. LVN L said it would not be sanitary as the nursing staff deal with a lot of feces in resident rooms and bugs can get on to unclean surfaces then get onto food. LVN L stated keeping foods out of the rooms as much as possible to prevent the spread of germs and prevent illness. LVN L stated Resident #53 ate breakfast in the dining room and that she would make sure he eats lunch in the dining room as well. During a telephone interview on 11/06/2023 at 10:30 AM, the Administrator stated yes, the facility had cockroaches or other bugs in the building prior to the survey and at any time a report on pest sightings, the facility Maintenance Director will spray, or pest control services will come if there are multiple sightings. The Administrator stated that Resident #53's room was treated for fruit flies on Sunday 11/05/2023 and again during the morning of 11/06/2023. The Administrator stated Resident #53 likes to keep the window open from time to time and he said there was a screen on the window. The Administrator stated it was more of just an inconvenience, that no one wants to have fruit flies in the room. The Administrator stated the resident would be offered to move out of the room to perform a deep clean. He also stated that the facility would conduct a root cause analysis. The Administrator stated that the goal would be to manage the pests as best as possible. The Administrator stated that although it would not be possible to eliminate the pests, but it would be desirable. He said he was the person responsible to keep the building free of pests. The Administrator stated some residents like to keep food containers out and not every resident was going to be clean. He said his expectation from the staff would be to help keep the rooms clean by picking up the trays after the residents were done eating. Record review of the Pest Control Service Information dated 11/01/2023, re-service read in part: .Observed issue, one cockroach in 207 .Technician Comments .One nymph German cockroach was observed but nothing of major concern. room [ROOM NUMBER] next door was also inspected and treated out of precaution . Record review of the Pest Control Service Information dated 11/01/2023, monthly service, read in part: .Observed issues German cockroaches 115, 205, 208 .Site Recommendations .Conducive Conditions, limit or place food from nightstands in containers to limit .for pest .live activity was only found in rooms 115, 205, 208 .kitchen also noted seeing gnats in the pantry . Record review of the Pest Control Service Information dated 09/08/2023, monthly service read in part: .Technician Comments: .the main areas of concern were the far end of 300 hall and various areas of 100 and 400 halls. The kitchen had no noted issues since our previous visit, but I did notice some small flies .Active German cockroaches were seen in the Administration office . Record review of the Pest Control Service Information dated 08/14/2023 for follow up visit read in part: .Technician Comments .room [ROOM NUMBER] .high volume of food debris around Bed A .room [ROOM NUMBER] .5 German Cockroaches were found .room [ROOM NUMBER] yielded nymph German cockroaches behind nightstand .302 .dead cockroach activity was found . Record review of the Pest Control Service Information dated 08/02/2023, monthly service read in part: .Technician Comments .Live German cockroaches observed in 305 and 304 .several German cockroach sightings were noticed in the actual hallway Record review of the facility policy and procedure for Pest Control, revised August 2008 read in part: Policy Statement - Our facility shall maintain an effective pest control program. Policy Interpretation and Implementation - 1. This facility maintains an on-going pest control program to ensure that the building is kept free of insects and rodents. 2. Pest control services are provided by pest control company. 3. Windows are screened at all times 5. Garbage and trash are not permitted to accumulate and are removed from the facility daily. 6. Maintenance services assist, when appropriate and necessary, in providing pest control services. .
Sept 2022 6 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0645 (Tag F0645)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents with mental disorder received an ind...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents with mental disorder received an independent physical and mental evaluation performed by a person or entity other than the State mental health authority, prior to admission, to determine whether the individual required specialized services for one of four (Residents #42) resident reviewed for PASARR. -The facility failed to conduct an accurate PASRR screenings for Resident #42 upon their admission. This failure could affect residents who require PASRR services and place them at risk of not having their special needs assessed and met by the facility. Findings include: Record review of Resident #42's EMR (electronic monitoring record) face sheet accessed 9/25/2020 at 2:00 PM, revealed he was admitted on [DATE] and re-admitted [DATE]. His diagnoses were mental illness diagnoses, bipolar disorder, (a mental disorder characterized by disorganized speech or behavior and decreased participation in daily activities), major depressant disorder single episode ( mood disorder), and anxiety disorder. Record review of Resident # 42's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], revealed his BIMs score was 09 out of 15, which indicated he was moderately cognitively intact. Section A 15000 of the MDS regarding PASRR, was coded 0, which indicated no mental illness . Record review of Resident #42's medical diagnosis on 02/16/22, revealed he was diagnosed with mental illness by his physician of bipolar and major depression and there were no care plan. During an interview on 09/26/22 3:40 PM, MDS/PPS Coordinator A, said she started working with the facility about 3 weeks ago, and she had been auditing residents charts and found out some resident did not have PASRR level 1 assessment . Resident #42's mental illness diagnoses were missed upon first PASRR level 1 screening forms and were not identified and coded correctly as yes in section C0100 pertaining to Mental Illness. Record review of Resident #42's admission dated 02/25/22 the question in section C read in part .Is there evidence or an indicator this is an individual that has a Mental illness . revealed the answer to this question was changed to Yes after the interview with MDS/PPS Coordinator A at 4:00 PM. During a follow-up interview on 9/27/2022 at 3:51 PM with MDS/PPS Coordinator A and the DON, both said they would have to look for that PASRR Level I assessments for Resident # 42 if it was done. Resident #42 has been in and out on admission to hospital. DON said her expectation was for all resident to be screen for PASSR level 1 on admission. The DON did not have any PASRR level 1 assessment for Resident #42 prior to exit. During an interview with the Administrator and DON on 09/28/22 at 12:00 PM they said the Quality Assurance committee had identified issues with the MDS assessments and care plans. He said the facility was working on those issues. Record review of the facility's PASRR CLINICAL POLICY dated 12/2014 read in part, .Purpose .The PASSR level 1 (PL1) Screening Form is designed to identify persons who are suspected of having Mental Illness (MI). Intellectual Disability (ID) of a Developmental Disability (DD) also referred to as Related Conditions . The PASRR Evaluation (PE) is designed to confirm to confirm the suspicion of MI, ID or DD/RC and ensure the individual is placed in the most integrated residential setting receiving the specialized services needed to improve and maintain the individual 's level of functioning . If documentation entered on the PL 1 Indicates MI/ID/DD, a PE Must be completed . .
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0655 (Tag F0655)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident which i...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident which included instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that met professional standards of quality of care for 1 of 3 residents (CR # 42) record reviewed for baseline care plan. The facility failed to initiate a base line-care plan with goals, interventions, treatments, and psychosocial needs to address Resident# 42's medical needs, coordinate care with interdisciplinary teams to assure the resident received care at professional standards. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of not having their immediate individual, medical, functional, and psychosocial needs identified and met and could cause a physical or psychosocial decline in health. Findings include: Record review of Resident #42's EMR face sheet accessed on 9/25/2020 at 2:00 PM, revealed he was admitted on [DATE] and re-admitted [DATE]. His diagnoses were mental illness diagnoses, bipolar disorder, (a mental disorder characterized by disorganized speech or behavior and decreased participation in daily activities), type 2 diabetes mellitus ( high glucose level in the blood), major depressant disorder single episode ( mood disorder), MRSA ( Methicillin - resistant Staphylococcus aureus= is a cause of staph infection that is difficult to treat because of resistance to some antibiotics) of right foot, contact isolation and anxiety disorder. Record review of Resident #42's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], revealed Section C: Cognitive Patterns revealed resident had a BIMS of 9 of 15, he was moderately impaired cognitively and ADL activity assistance occurred with two-person physical assist. Record review of CR #42's physician's order dated 9/17/22 revealed the resident was, on contact isolation for MRSA to wound on the right foot, treatment and was on Doxycycline ( antibiotic used for treatment of MRSA). Record review of CR #42's medical record revealed there was no documentation of a baseline care plan. There were no plans to address contact isolation, medications, ADL's, (activity of daily living) psychosocial well-being, wound treatment and bowel incontinence for re-admission on [DATE]. Observation during initial rounds on 9/25/22 at 9:30 AM, revealed Resident # 42 was on contact isolation with sign posted on the door, resident had bandage to his right foot. Resident #42 had left (AKA)above knee amputation. During an interview on 09/26/22 3:40 PM, MDS/PPS Coordinator A, said she just started working for the facility about 3 weeks ago, and she had been auditing residents charts and had problems with care plans. She said base line care plan should be done in 48 hours on resident admission and any change in conditions. During an interview on 9/27/22 at 11:02 AM, the DON said Resident #42 was re-admitted on contact isolation, the admission nurse was responsible for completing the base line care plan. The DON said the admitting was not available for interview. The DON said if the nurse missed it, it would be her responsibility to catch it. In an interview on 9/28/22 at 12:51 PM, the DON said baseline care plans were to ensure the proper care of residents and know interventions needed. She stated every resident must have a baseline care plan on admission to provide the best quality of care and she would be auditing baseline care plans, and this would be ongoing. Record review of the facility's Care Plan on - Baseline, Policy Statement (revised December 2009) indicated A baseline care plan to meet the resident's immediate health and safety needs is developed for each resident within forty-eight (48) hours of admission.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to describe the services to be furnished to attain the pe...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to describe the services to be furnished to attain the person-centered care plan to reflect the current condition for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for care plan revisions. (Resident #53) in that; Resident #53's care plan did not address the use of a foley catheter. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of not receiving appropriate interventions to meet their current needs. Findings include: Record review of the face sheet for Resident #53 revealed an [AGE] year-old female with admission date of 05/31/2022. Her diagnoses included, Uropathy (blockage in urinary tract or having trouble urinating or peeing) ,Pressure Ulcer of Sacral Region, , Other specified Diseases of Anus and Rectum, and Cholelithiasis ( gallstones disease) . Record review of the most recent MDS dated [DATE] revealed in section H- Bowel and Bladder Resident #53 had an indwelling catheter. Record review of the care plan with start date 9/15/22 and completion date 9/22/2022 revealed it did not show Resident # 53 with Foley catheter and the interventions needed to care for resident . Record review of the care plan with start date 6/24/2022 and completion date 8/24/2022 revealed it did not show Resident # 53 with Foley catheter and the interventions needed to care for resident . Observation of Resident # 53 on 09/26/2022 at 2:45 PM, Resident #53 had a Foley catheter attached to the side of the bed. Interview on 09/28/2022 at 12:00 PM with the DON stated that care plans are not up to date and have the interventions needed for residents. DON said it is one of the areas that QAPI was reviewing and working on getting corrected and do better with. Record review of the facility's policy, Care Plans revised December 2009 read in part: . 5. The Care Planning/Interdisciplinary Team is responsible for the periodic review and updating of care plans: a. When there has been a significant change in the resident's condition; b. When the desired outcome is not met; c. When the resident has been readmitted to the facility from a hospital stay; and d. At least quarterly. .
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0657 (Tag F0657)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan is reviewed and ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan is reviewed and revised by an interdisciplinary team after each assessment for 2 (Resident #43 and #53) of 18 residents reviewed for care plan revisions, in that: Resident #43's comprehensive care plan did not address the residents dialysis status . Resident # 53's care plan did not reflect the use of foley catheter. These failures could affect residents resulting in inadequate care. The findings included: Resident #43 Record review of Resident #43's Face Sheet dated 02/7/22 revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility 2/7/22. Her diagnoses were dialysis and end stage renal failure (kidneys stop functioning) Observation on 09/25/22 at 9:30 AM, revealed Resident #43 was sitting up in her bed, alert and not oriented eating breakfast. Record review of Resident #43's admission MDS dated [DATE] and quarterly MDS completed on 08/05/2022 section O0100 (J) Special Treatment, Procedures and programs Dialysis was checked. Record review of the physician's order on admission dated 2/6/22 had Resident #43 on dialysis M-W-F. Record review of Resident #43's facility provided care plan revealed it was last updated 6/2/2022. The care plan did not reveal any diagnoses or treatment plans for Resident #43's diagnosis of dialysis. During an interview on 09/27/2022 at 12:20 PM with the DON, the DON stated she was responsible for updating the care plans. The DON stated care plans should have been updated/revised quarterly and when significant changes occurred. She verified the last care plan that had been completed for Resident #43 was dated 6/2/2022 and she was currently working on the new care plan. The DON was asked how soon after an MDS was completed should a new care plan have been completed and the DON stated 10 days. The DON stated the dates of MDS and Care Plans for Resident #43 had not been updated/revised within the timeframe. During an interview with the Administrator and DON on 09/28/22 at 12:00 PM they said the Quality Assurance committee had identified issues with the MDS assessments and care plans. He said the facility was working on those issues. Resident #53 Record review of the face sheet for Resident # 53 revealed an [AGE] year-old female with admission date of 05/31/2022. Her diagnoses included Osteomyelitis, Pressure Ulcer of Sacral Region, Altered Mental Status, Hypertension, Osteoarthritis of both Hips, Alzheimer's with late onset, Dementia with Behavioral Disturbance, Contracture of Right and Left Hips, Age Related Osteoporosis, Other specified Diseases of Anus and Rectum, Constipation, Hyperlipidemia, Personal History of Traumatic Brain Injury, Cholelithiasis Observation of Resident # 53 on 09/26/2022 at 2:45 PM. showed resident 53 awake in bed with air mattress. Foley catheter to bedside drainage with yellow urine in the bag. Interview on 09/27/2022 at 10:35 AM, CNA B said catheter care for foley was every shift and as needed. LVN C said Resident #53 has had the foley catheter for approximately two months. She verbalized that it was not because resident # 53 had a sacral wound but could not remember the reason. Record review of the most recent MDS dated [DATE] revealed in section H- Bowel and Bladder that Resident # 56 had indwelling catheter. Record review of the MAR dated 9/1/2022 to 9/30/2022 revealed Resident # 56 showed Foley catheter 16 French 10 cc bulb to bedside drainage with Diagnosis of Obstructive Uropathy with start date of 9/21/2022. Further review indicated Foley catheter care Every shift and as needed and Foley catheter output every shift with a start date of 8/15/2022 Record review of the care plan with start date 9/15/22 and completion date 9/22/2022 revealed it did not show Resident # 53 with Foley catheter and the interventions needed to care for resident . Record review of the care plan with start date 6/24/2022 and completion date 8/24/2022 revealed it did not show Resident # 53 with Foley catheter and the interventions needed to care for resident . Interview on 09/28/2022 at 12:00 PM with the DON stated that care plans are not up to date and have the interventions needed for residents. DON said it is one of the areas that QAPI was reviewing and working on getting corrected and do better with. Record review of the facility's policy, Care Plans revised December 2009 read in part The Care Planning/Interdisciplinary Team .develops and maintains a comprehensive care plan for each resident that identifies the highest level of functioning.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Incontinence Care (Tag F0690)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were incontinent received approp...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were incontinent received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #14) reviewed for incontinent care in that: - CNA A did not completely clean Resident #14 during incontinent care. This failure could affect residents who were incontinent and place them at risk for urinary tract infections, discomfort, skin breakdown, and a decreased quality of life. Findings include: Record review of Resident #14's Face sheet revealed an [AGE] year-old female was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses were, partial traumatic amputation of right lower leg, infection of amputation stump, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), cerebral infarction (stroke)without residual deficits, lymphedema (swelling in an arm or leg caused by a lymphatic system blockage) and essential (primary) hypertension (high blood pressure) Record review of Resident #14's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS of 13 indicating mild impaired cognition. Further review revealed Resident #14 needed extensive to total care assist with ADL care with two staff assistance with bowel and bladder incontinence. Record review of Resident #14's care plan revised 08/24/22 revealed the residents was incontinent of bowel. An intervention was to document bowel movement every shift. The care plan did not indicate how often rounds are made for incontinent care or how many staff required to provide care. Observation of incontinent care for Resident #14 on 09/28/22 at 10:12 AM revealed CNA A washed hands and donned cleaned gloves, then took off Resident #14's soiled brief with medium bowel movement and urine. CNA A used the wipes to clean the groin and did not open the labia to clean. Resident #14 was repositioned on her right side. CNA A wiped in between the buttocks four times with bowel movement but did not clean around the buttocks. She then removed her gloves and sanitize hands. CNA A then placed a clean brief and a draw sheet on the resident. In an interview with CNA A on 9/28/22 at 11:20 AM, CNA A was asked why she did not open the labia and wipe the are clean and why she did not clean around the buttocks during Resident #14's incontinence care? CNA A said she was nervous and she had skilled check on incontinence care a month ago and she knew not cleaning well could result to skin break down and infection. In an interview with the DON on 9/28/20 at 2:10 PM. she said ADON does incontinence skilled checks for CNAs on hire and random competency checks. The DON said when residents are not appropriately cleaned by separating the labia or rectum, the resident may have rashes, skin breakdown, or infection. Record review of CNA A's personnel file revealed date of hired was 5/10/22, pre-test incontinence care was checked completed on 5/24/22 and the post -test incontinence care had no name and did not indicate the date it was completed. On 9/28/22 at 2:50 PM, surveyor requested for the nursing skills and technique incontinence from the DON, she did not provide incontinent care policy requested before exit. .
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Unnecessary Medications (Tag F0759)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the medication error rate was not five pe...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the medication error rate was not five percent (%) or greater. The facility had a medication error rate of 8 %, based on 3 errors out of 37 opportunities, which involved 1 of 6 residents (Resident #15); and 1 of 4 staff ( MA A, ) reviewed for medication errors. The facility failed to ensure: -MA A administer 20 MG of Omeprazole as suggested by the manufacturer which states to take in the morning on an empty stomach and to separate four hours from iron and vitamin/mineral supplement when administering medication to Resident #15. ( Review of the Omeprazole manufacture's website reflected it was recommended, .Take preferably on an empty stomach, one-half to one hour before breakfast .Products such as Iron and Multivitamin supplements, and antacids can lower your body's ability to absorb it .should be take 4 hours before or after taking these products. (Accessed at (https://www.drugs.com.iron-sulfat .). -MA A administered vitamin C as ordered by the doctor. -MA A administered 4 % Lidocaine Patch as ordered by the doctor These failures could place all residents receiving medication at risk of inadequate therapeutic outcomes, increased negative side effects, and a decline in health. Findings include: Resident #15 Review of Resident #15's Face Sheet, dated 09/25/22, reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included gastroesophageal reflux disease( backflow of acid from in the stomach the throat) ( GERD) , essential primary hypertension ( high blood pressure) functional quadriplegia (a person affected by paralysis of all four limbs). Record review of admission MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #15 was understood and understood others. The MDS revealed Resident #15 had a BIMS of 14 which indicated intact cognition and required total dependence for ADLs. Review of Resident #15's Drug-to-Drug Interaction detail, no date, reflected, . Omeprazole capsule 20mg other active drugs .Thera-M Tablet .interaction detail . may decrease pharma logical effects .Ferrous Sulfate Tablet 325 MG .pharma logical effects may be decreased by Ferrous Sulfate Tablet 325 MG . Review of Resident #15's physician order, dated 6/29/2022, reflected, Omeprazole capsule 20mg . Give capsule by mouth one time a day for GERD. Lidocaine Patch 4 % Apply to upper back topically one time a day for pain , place to upper back between shoulders and remove per schedule ( Apply 0800 (8:00 AM) and remove 2000 (8:00PM). Vitamin C tablet 500 mg (Ascorbic acid) Give 2 tablet by mouth one time a day for supplement Review of the consultant pharmacist dated 09/06/22 had Change Omeprazole to be given before breakfast, clarify Lidocaine patch to apply to . in the morning and remove at bedtime and document placement and removal. An observation of medication pass on 09/26/22 at 7:59 AM revealed MA A preparing medications for Resident #15. MA A placed 22 tablets in a medication cup. (Included: Omeprazole, Ferrous Sulfate, Thera-M, Vitamin C) MA A gave Vitamin C 500 mg 1 tab by mouth. MA A then remove the old Lidocaine patch 4% to left upper arm, then applied Lidocaine Patch 4 % tropically to Resident #15's upper left arm, ( Physician order had Lidocaine 4 % place to upper back between shoulders and remove per schedule ( Apply 0800 (8:00 AM) and remove 2000 (8:00PM) . Watched as Resident #15 took her medications. MA A returned to the medication cart and documented the medications administration. In an interview with MA A on 09/27/22 at 10:23 AM, regarding Vitamin C 500 mg 2 tablets ordered and 1 tablet was given, Ferrous Sulfate, Multivitamin, Omeprazole given together, she said she was nervous and did not know Omeprazole, ferrous sulfate and Multivitamin should not be given at the same time. MA A said placing Lidocaine patch 4% to left upper arm instead of placing it to Resident #15's upper back was her mistake, and she was very sorry for it, she said the evening nurse was supposed to remove Lidocaine patch 4% to left upper arm at 8:00 PM. She stated, I was supposed to read physician's order more than once, check, dose, and route. MA A said she had been working with the facility for 4 years and she had medication pass training every month with ADON and a gentleman the pharmacist also trained her. MA A she was supposed to follow the physician's order to ensure that resident was not under medicated or overdose. In an interview with the DON on 09/27/22 at 11:00 AM, she said she had in-services with the nurses, and she expect the nurses to administered medication as ordered by the physician. She said the pharmacist comes to the facility monthly and the time for Omeprazole should have been changed on the MAR. She said medications still had to be safely administered and accurately documented. In an interview with ADON on 9/27/22 at 11:57 AM, she said just accepted the position as ADON 3 days ago and she has not done any training for the nurses. ADON said the Pharmacist consultant just corrected the Omeprazole and Lidocaine order on 9/06/22. In an interview with the Administrator on 9/27/22 at 2:45 p.m. revealed that the medication should be administered as ordered by the doctor Record review of the facility's Administering Medications policy dated March 2011 read in part . Medications shall be administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed . 6. The individual administering the medication must check the label THREE (3) times to verify the right medication, right dosage, right time and right method (route) of administration before giving the medication . .
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
  • "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: 3 life-threatening violation(s), $181,138 in fines. Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 19 deficiencies on record, including 3 critical (life-threatening) violations. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
  • • $181,138 in fines. Extremely high, among the most fined facilities in Texas. Major compliance failures.
  • • Grade F (9/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: This facility has 3 Immediate Jeopardy findings. Serious concerns require careful evaluation.

About This Facility

What is Park Manor Of Humble's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns PARK MANOR OF HUMBLE an overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars, which is considered average nationally. Within Texas, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This mid-range rating indicates the facility meets federal standards but may have areas for improvement.

How is Park Manor Of Humble Staffed?

CMS rates PARK MANOR OF HUMBLE's staffing level at 1 out of 5 stars, which is much below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 62%, which is 16 percentage points above the Texas average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs.

What Have Inspectors Found at Park Manor Of Humble?

State health inspectors documented 19 deficiencies at PARK MANOR OF HUMBLE during 2022 to 2025. These included: 3 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death) and 16 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.

Who Owns and Operates Park Manor Of Humble?

PARK MANOR OF HUMBLE is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by HMG HEALTHCARE, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 125 certified beds and approximately 111 residents (about 89% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in HUMBLE, Texas.

How Does Park Manor Of Humble Compare to Other Texas Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Texas, PARK MANOR OF HUMBLE's overall rating (3 stars) is above the state average of 2.8, staff turnover (62%) is significantly higher than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (3 stars) is at the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Park Manor Of Humble?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations, the facility's high staff turnover rate, and the below-average staffing rating.

Is Park Manor Of Humble Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, PARK MANOR OF HUMBLE has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 3 Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 3-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Texas. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.

Do Nurses at Park Manor Of Humble Stick Around?

Staff turnover at PARK MANOR OF HUMBLE is high. At 62%, the facility is 16 percentage points above the Texas average of 46%. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?

Was Park Manor Of Humble Ever Fined?

PARK MANOR OF HUMBLE has been fined $181,138 across 1 penalty action. This is 5.2x the Texas average of $34,890. Fines at this level are uncommon and typically indicate a pattern of serious deficiencies, repeated violations, or failure to correct problems promptly. CMS reserves penalties of this magnitude for facilities that pose significant, documented risk to resident health or safety. Families should request specific documentation of what issues led to these fines and what systemic changes have been implemented.

Is Park Manor Of Humble on Any Federal Watch List?

PARK MANOR OF HUMBLE is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.