BAY RIDGE HEALTHCARE CENTER

208 SOUTH UTAH, LA PORTE, TX 77571 (281) 471-1810
For profit - Corporation 58 Beds NEXION HEALTH Data: November 2025 4 Immediate Jeopardy citations
Trust Grade
0/100
#412 of 1168 in TX
Last Inspection: February 2025

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Bay Ridge Healthcare Center in La Porte, Texas, has a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns about the facility's quality of care. It ranks #412 out of 1,168 facilities in Texas, placing it in the top half, and #38 out of 95 in Harris County, meaning it has several local competitors. The facility is on an improving trend, having reduced its issues from 8 in 2024 to just 1 in 2025. Staffing is average with a 58% turnover rate, which is close to the state average, and they have average RN coverage. However, the facility has faced serious compliance issues, including multiple incidents of abuse and neglect, such as a staff member verbally intimidating residents and allowing a significant other to threaten a resident with a gun. While there are some strengths, these critical incidents raise serious concerns about resident safety and the overall environment.

Trust Score
F
0/100
In Texas
#412/1168
Top 35%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Getting Better
8 → 1 violations
Staff Stability
⚠ Watch
58% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
Penalties
✓ Good
$18,054 in fines. Lower than most Texas facilities. Relatively clean record.
Skilled Nurses
⚠ Watch
Each resident gets only 20 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Texas. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
Violations
⚠ Watch
28 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★★★☆☆
3.0
Overall Rating
★★★☆☆
3.0
Staff Levels
★★★☆☆
3.0
Care Quality
★★★☆☆
3.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2024: 8 issues
2025: 1 issues

The Good

  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in fire safety.

The Bad

3-Star Overall Rating

Near Texas average (2.8)

Meets federal standards, typical of most facilities

Staff Turnover: 58%

12pts above Texas avg (46%)

Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity

Federal Fines: $18,054

Below median ($33,413)

Minor penalties assessed

Chain: NEXION HEALTH

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

Staff turnover is elevated (58%)

10 points above Texas average of 48%

The Ugly 28 deficiencies on record

4 life-threatening 1 actual harm
Feb 2025 1 deficiency
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person- centered...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person- centered care plan that included measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's medical, nursing, and psychosocial needs identified in the comprehensive assessment for 3 of 12 residents reviewed for care plan accuracy (Residents #38, #17, #19), in that: 1. The facility failed to ensure the care plan for Resident #38's Hospice included a focus, goals, or interventions. 2. Facility failed to provide a care plan for Resident # 17's Dialysis. 3. Facility failed to document cerebral vascular accident affecting left side documented on Resident 19's care plan when they have right sided weakness. These failures placed residents at risk of not receiving needed services due to inaccurate comprehensive care plans. Findings include: Resident #38 Record review of Resident #38's face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old female with admission date 2/22/24 and diagnoses including Hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebrovascular disease (weakness and paralysis on one side of the body), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (lung disease that makes it difficult to breathe), anxiety disorder (feelings of worry, anxiety, fear interfering with daily activities), dementia (neurological condition affecting the brain), major depressive disorder (depression or loss of interest for at least 2 weeks), and chronic kidney disease(gradual loss of kidney function over time). Record review of Resident #38's Significant Change MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed BIMS score of 07 out of 15 which indicated impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making, unclear speech, sometimes being understood, sometimes understands others, moderate to maximum assistance for ADLs, and dependent for toileting and receiving Hospice care. Record review of Resident #38's undated comprehensive care plan contained no focus, goals, or interventions for Hospice care. Record review of Resident #38's physician orders dated for 2/2025 revealed: Admit to [Hospice Company] (Dx: Cerebral Infarction) 1/11/2025. Record review of Hospice Company contract revealed home health aide, nurses, social work, and chaplain would be provided, with daily care to be provided by the nursing facility. l Observation and attempted interview with Resident #38 on 2/18/25 revealed she was in bed, awake, clean, and was not responding to questions. Resident #17 Record review of Resident #17's face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old male with admission date of 4/3/24 and diagnoses including end stage renal disease (loss of kidneys to remove waste and balance fluids), Diabetes (inability of the body to control glucose in the blood), vascular dementia (decline in thinking skills), major depressive disorder (persistent depressed mood or loss of interest), peripheral vascular disease (poor circulation due to narrow blood vessels in legs), acquired absence of left leg below knee. Record review of Resident #17's physician orders dated for 2/2025 revealed: Resident to receive dialysis 3 days a week MWF . chair time 11:00a.m. Record review of Resident 17's Significant Change MDS dated [DATE] revealed BIMS 13 out of 15 which indicated modified independence in cognitive skills for decision making, usually understood and understands, moderate to maximum assistance for ADLs, and Dialysis. Record review of Resident #17's undated comprehensive care plan revealed no focus, goals, or interventions for Dialysis. Observation and interview with Resident #17 on 2/18/25 at 10:15am revealed he was sitting in his wheelchair outside the nurses' station. He had a warm coat and a scarf across his shoulders and told surveyor he was going outside and to Dialysis and wanted to be warm. In an interview with MDS nurse on 2/20/25 at 2:30pm revealed if the resident just got on hospice, it would not be on the care plan for 90 days since she does care plans every 90 days. She said the risk of having inaccurate care plans would be they would not get the right care. In an interview with the DON on 2/20/25 at 2:40pm, she said she did not know why the Hospice or Dialysis were missed on the care plan. She said the nurses have input into the care plans and they let the MDS nurse know of any changes, and the MDS nurse would incorporate it into the comprehensive care plan. She said the risk of having inaccurate care plans would be things would not get done for the resident, and it would not be on the [NAME]. Resident #19 Record Review of Resident #19's face sheet dated 2/20/25, revealed resident is a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease with (Acute) Exacerbation, and Hemiplegia (One-Sided Paralysis or Weakness of the Face, Arm and Leg) and Hemiparesis (One-Sided Muscle Weakness caused by Brain, Spinal Cord or Nerve Problems) Following Cerebrovascular Disease (Disorders that affect blood flow to the brain) Affecting Left Dominant Side. Record review of Resident's #19's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 12 out of 15 which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. Record review of Resident #19's care plan revealed that The resident had a cerebral vascular accident (CVA/Stroke) affecting left side which is not correct as Resident 19 has had a cerebral vascular accident (CVA/Stroke) affecting her right side. Record review of Resident #19's occupational therapy notes for certification period of 11/9/24 to 1/7/25 revealed that resident had impaired right upper extremity strength and left upper extremity strength was within functional limits. Record review of Resident #19's doctor's progress note dated 2/14/2025 revealed that Resident #19 had an old CVA (Stroke) with right hemiparesis (One-Sided Muscle Weakness caused by Brain, Spinal Cord or Nerve Problems) listed under the past medical history section. Observation and Interview on 2/18/25 at 11:33 a.m. revealed that Resident #19 could not move her right arm during observation of 10 minutes while initial pool questions were being asked by surveyor. Resident #19 said she had done physical therapy but not in the last couple of months. During an interview on 2/19/25 at 11:31 a.m., the Director of Rehab said that Resident #19 was on physical therapy at the time of the interview. During an interview on 2/19/25 at 2:12 p.m., LVN G said that Resident #19's right arm was the arm she had difficulty moving. During an interview on 2/19/25 at 2:12 p.m., CMA G said that Resident #19's right arm was the arm she had difficulty moving. During an interview on 2/19/25 at 2:13 p.m., the DON said that Resident #19's right arm was the arm she had difficulty moving. During an interview on 2/19/25 at 2:13 p.m., the ADON said that Resident #19's right arm was the arm she had difficulty moving. During an interview on 2/19/25 at 3:45 p.m., Resident #19 said her right arm had been affected by a stroke in 2019, and she was unable to move her right arm. Resident #19 denied ever having any deficit in her left arm as was documented in Resident #19's care plan. During an interview on 2/19/25 at 3:45 p.m., Resident #18 Family said that Resident #19 had difficulty moving her right arm, and it occurred when she had a stroke in 2019. During an interview on 2/20/25 at 8:49 a.m., the ADON said the MDS nurse entered information into the residents' care plans. During an interview on 2/20/25 at 8:50 a.m., the DON said the MDS nurse entered information into the resident's care plans. During an interview on 2/20/25 at 9:19 a.m., Casemix Specialist A said she was the MDS nurse, but her title was Casemix Specialist. Casemix Specialist A said that care plan information was entered by the MDS nurse. Casemix Specialist A said that the information for left hemiplegia on Resident 19's care plan was initially entered by Casemix Specialist B who was the Casemix Specialist at the time. Casemix Specialist A said that she reviewed the resident's care plans every 90 days but generally reviewed things that were acute and going to change. Casemix Specialist A said she was familiar with Resident #19 and that her right side was affected. Record review of the facility's policy Care Plans, Comprehensive Person Centered revealed, in part: Care plans describe the services to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, psychosocial well-being .to identify professional services responsible for each resident's care . and Identifying problem areas and their causes and developing interventions that are targeted and meaningful to the resident, are the endpoint of an interdisciplinary process. Also, assessments of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the residents and the residents' conditions change. Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered policy was reviewed November 2024.
Aug 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

PASARR Coordination (Tag F0644)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to coordinate the assessments with the pre admission screening and resi...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to coordinate the assessments with the pre admission screening and resident review (PASARR program under Medicaid in subpart C to the maximum extent practicable to avoid duplicative testing and effort which includes incorporating the recommendations from the PASRR level II determination and the PASARR evaluation report into a resident's assessment, care planning and transitions of care for 1 of 4 residents Resident #1 reviewed for PASARR. Preadmission Screening for individuals with a mental disorder and individuals with intellectual disability. The Facility failed to provide Resident #1 specialized services of PT, OT, and ST. Based on record review November 15, 2022 was the date listed in Simple LTC PASARR Portal. The facility failed to submit a NFSS request for nursing facility specialized services in the LTC Online Portal for Resident#1's OT, PT, and ST specialized services by a specific deadline. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving specialized PASARR services which could contribute to a decline in physical, [NAME] psychosocial well-being and quality of life. Findings include: Record review of Resident #1's electronic face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included, intellectual disability, Mood disorder, (bipolar disorder and Major depression (A serious mental illness characterized by extreme mood swings, panic, or other severe anxiety disorder.) Record review of Resident #1'sAnnual MDS assessment, dated 01/25/24, reflected Resident #1 was positive for intellectual disability and other related condition. Her cognitive patterns Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMs ) were coded as 13 out of possible 15, which reflected she was cognitively intact. Record review of Resident #1 care plan, updated on 4/25/24, reflected the resident had a positive PASARR Level II for developmental Disability. Goal Resident #1 will receive all specialized services related to positive PASARR through the next 92 days target date of 05/27/24. Record review of the undated Simple LTC PASARR NFSS Activity Portal History, for Resident #1, reflected the NFSS form was completed and submitted for PT\OT and ST on 06/28/2019 but was rejected. Reason was wrong therapy services such as PT, OT and SP. During interview with the Rehab Director, on 8/6/24 at 12:00 PM, she stated the PASARR was just approved on 7/26/2024 and Resident #1 was currently receiving PT only for the next 6 months. The Rehab Director stated she was not aware who submitted the PASARR form, but she recalled it being rejected due to doctor signature. The Rehab Director stated she would enter the Resident's information for specialized services into the system once she got the ok from the MDS coordinator. The Rehab Director stated she had been employed at the facility for 3 years. During an interview with the MDS Coordinator on 08/06/24 at 1:00 PM, she said she did not complete the forms and corporate would complete the form and send it to the facility and was not sure why Resident #1's PASARR was not completed. The MDS Coordinator stated she just started in April of this year. She said the therapy department was supposed to complete the NFSS forms and send them in through the LTC online portal. Record review of a statement from the PASARR Unit Program Specialist of IDD Services reflected as discussed on the phone, you will need to submit a NFSS request forms for PASARR Specialized Services (Therapies and Assessments PT) by 6/10/2024 and customized manual wheelchair by 6/12/2024 through the Texas Medicaid and Healthcare Partnership (TMHP) Long Term Care Portal. The resident has not received a Medicaid service because of the following: The nursing facility administrator and MDS nurse was notified and instructed to submit a NFSS Request by a specific deadline but failed to do so. The NFSS Request submittal by the nursing facility was denied and there was not a follow up submittal to ensure the request was approved to provide specialized services for PASARR for the residents. Based on interview with MDS nurse on 08/06/24 at 2:00pm she stated that she could not give me an answer to why the NFSS form was not completed. She also stated that the facility corporation handle all PASARR information. She also stated she started in April and can not say to why or why not the previous MDS nurse did or not did. MDS nurse stated she was made aware as of today that Resident#1 was not receiving services. She also stated that she understands that is important for all Residents to receive the services they deserve to have because this would improve their quality of life. Record review of PASARR requirement, dated 11/10/2023, Titled Companion Guide for Completing the Authorization Request for PASARR Nursing Facility Specialized Services (NFSS) Form, Page 9, read in part . NFSS Request More Than 30-Calendar Days After IDT Meeting If the nursing facility is submitting the NFSS request more than 20 business days (Approximately, 30 calendar days) after the initial IDT or annual specialized services. meeting, the nursing facility submitters will receive an error message to this effect. This is to notify the nursing facility submitters that they are out of compliance with the requirements in rule and may be subject to a follow-up visit by regulatory staff.
Apr 2024 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0802 (Tag F0802)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observations, interviews, and records reviewed, the facility failed to provide sufficient support personnel to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service safely and effectively...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interviews, and records reviewed, the facility failed to provide sufficient support personnel to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service safely and effectively for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for dietary services. -The facility failed to provide sufficient dietary staffing for breakfast on 03/29/24. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving meals at designated mealtimes and a diminished quality of life. The findings included: Observation and interview on 04/01/24 at 11:41 a.m., revealed Resident #3 was lying in bed. She said last Saturday, 03/30/24, or Friday, 03/29/24, they had kolaches and donuts for breakfast. She said she usually ate cereal for breakfast, but it was something she could eat and did not have any concerns about what was served. Observation and interview on 04/03/24 at 3:49 p.m., revealed Resident #6 was lying in bed. She said she had been feeling under the weather since she had returned from the hospital. She said the facility served donuts and kolaches last Friday, 03/29/24, for breakfast and she had enough to eat. She said it was an isolated incident, the Dietary Manager was on suspension, and it was corrected the next day. She said she asked questions about it because she was the Resident Counsel President. In an interview on 04/01/24 at 2:40 p.m., CNA B said she worked 6:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. on Friday 03/29/24. She said she believed that was the day they had to order breakfast for the residents. She said she texted the Administrator, DON, and ADON at 7:19 a.m. to let them know there was no one in the kitchen. She said she told the Charge Nurse there was no dietary staff at the facility and said the Charge Nurse called the DON. She said kolaches and donuts were ordered for the residents. In an interview on 04/01/24 at 4:02 p.m., the ADON, said there was no dietary staff on 03/29/24 to make breakfast. She said the facility ordered kolaches and donuts for the residents to eat. She said she was not notified about the dietary staff not showing up and found out that morning when she arrived to work at 8:07 a.m. She said she did not know what happened to the dietary staff. In an interview on 04/03/24 at 9:06 a.m., the DON said she was notified by telephone and text message, a little before 7:30 a.m. on 3/29/24 by the Charge Nurse, telling her that no one had shown up in the kitchen yet. She said after she was notified, she called the Administrator, and the Administrator called the Corporate Regional Nurse to let her know. She said the Corporate Regional Nurse said to go ahead and order breakfast. She said breakfast was ordered and delivered to the building. She said she was told they had delivered donuts, kolaches, oatmeal, and did not remember if they ordered cereal or got the cereal from the kitchen. She said the only conclusion she could come to about the dietary staff was there was a no call, no show. She said from there the dietary staff was called. She said if dietary staff were not at the facility to make breakfast, then it was not prepared on time and could come out late. In an interview on 04/03/24 at 9:13 a.m., Dietary Aide A said she was scheduled to work on Friday, 03/29/24, in the afternoon from 1:00 p.m. to 7:30 p.m. She said the Administrator called her first, between 7:00 a.m. and 7:30 a.m., but she did not answer the call. She said CNA A then called her at approximately at 8:00 a.m. and asked her to come in to work because there was no cook or tray aide at the facility. She said she told CNA A she would call [NAME] A so someone could be there to cook. She said she called [NAME] A right after she was called and asked her to come to work because there were no workers in the kitchen that showed up. She said she arrived at the facility at approximately 9:00 a.m. She said when she arrived at the facility [NAME] A was already there. She said they did not have to make breakfast that morning because she thinks they bought breakfast for the residents. She said she did not know what happened to the morning kitchen staff and that Dietary Aide B was scheduled to work that morning in the kitchen. A telephone interview on 04/03/24 at 9:51 a.m., with Dietary Aide B was attempted. The call was answered but then disconnected. A text message was sent at 9:52 a.m. requesting a return phone call. In an interview on 04/03/24 at 9:58 a.m., the Dietary Manager said she worked Monday through Friday, from 6:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. and was responsible for making the dietary aide schedule. She said on Thursday, 03/28/24, at approximately 2:25 p.m. she was placed on a 3-day suspension. She said the dietary staff schedule for that week had already been made. She said [NAME] A told her she could not work on Fridays, and some other days, on the previous day, Thursday, 03/28/24, between 2:00 p.m. and 2:30 p.m. She said Dietary Aide B was supposed to work Friday, 03/29/24, from 6:00 a.m. to 1:30 p.m., and on Saturday and Sunday from 6:00 a.m. to 7:30 p.m. She said Dietary Aide B sent her a text message Friday morning, 3/29/24, at approximately 8:00 a.m. telling her that she quit. She said she did not let management, or the workers know because she was on suspension. In an interview on 04/03/24 at 11:10 a.m., the Administrator said the dietary manager had been suspended on Thursday, 03/28/24, late in the afternoon and realized then that the Dietary Manager and Dietary Aide B was scheduled to work on Friday, 03/29/24. She said she called the Dietary Manager to let her know that she noticed they were scheduled to work. She said the Dietary Manager said not to worry, that she already notified her staff, and people would be in place. She said the Charge Nurse called the DON around 7:20 a.m. but she was not reached until around 7:40 a.m. She said she immediately tried to call [NAME] B but was unable to reach her. She said she then called the Corporate Regional Nurse at approximately 7:46 a.m. who told her to order food for residents. She said food was ordered at approximately 7:57 a.m. She said kolaches, donuts, and a separate order of apple juice, orange juice, and oatmeal was made. She said Dietary Aide B was a no call/no show and was terminated. She said she was told by the Dietary Manager, yesterday, 04/02/24 that Dietary Aide B notified her that she quit but she did not know what day she told the Dietary Manager. Interview on 04/03/24 at 3:33 p.m., revealed Resident #4 said he was doing pretty good. He said he was able to eat the donuts and kolaches that were served this past week for breakfast and did not have any trouble eating. Interview on 04/03/24 at 3:38 p.m., revealed Resident #5 said she was doing okay. She said they served donuts and kolaches this past week, 03/29/24, because there was no staff in the kitchen to make breakfast, because no one showed up. She said she was able to eat the food without difficulty and that it was enough for her. In an interview on 04/15/24 at 10:55 a.m., [NAME] A said she was not scheduled to work on Friday, 03/29/24. She said she was off that day, but Dietary Aide A called her at approximately 8:00 a.m. and asked her if she could come to work and mentioned to her that no one showed up to work in the kitchen. She said she arrived at the facility at approximately 9:00 a.m. She said she was the first kitchen staff to arrive. She said she did not have to make breakfast that morning. Record review of time punch cards for all of the dietary staff on 03/29/24, revealed [NAME] A clocked in at 9:07 a.m., [NAME] B clocked in at 1:13 p.m., and Dietary Aide A clocked in at 9:28 a.m. Record review of the facility's policy titled Staffing, revised October 2017, read in part .Our facility provides sufficient numbers of staff with the skills and competency necessary to provide care and services for all residents in accordance with resident care plans and the facility assessment .3. Other support services (e.g., dietary .) are also staffed to ensure that resident needs are met .
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0805 (Tag F0805)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received and was provided food prepared in a f...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received and was provided food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs for 2 (Resident #1 and Resident #2) of 5 residents reviewed for food preparation. -The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 and #2 received a pureed diet as ordered by the physician. This failure could place residents at risk for poor intake, unmet nutritional needs, choking, and aspiration (when food or drinks enter the lungs). The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's admission Record, dated 04/05/24, revealed a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's diagnoses included neuroleptic induced parkinsonism (condition where parkinsonian symptoms occur as a side effect of taking neuroleptic drugs), dysphagia (difficulty in swallowing) following unspecified cerebrovascular disease (group of conditions that affect blood flow and the blood vessels in the brain), dysphagia oropharyngeal phase (first stage of swallowing), and other dysphagia. Record review of Resident #1's physician orders, undated, read in part .enhanced diet, pureed texture, thin consistency, fortified meal plan, ordered 12/29/23, start 12/29/23 . Record review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 03/06/24, revealed the BIMS was not completed as resident was rarely/never understood. Further review revealed he required substantial/maximal assistance with feeding. Section K0520, 3. While a Resident, C. Mechanical altered diet and D. Therapeutic diet were checked. Record review of Resident #1's, undated, care plan revealed he had an ADL self-care performance deficit and required extensive assistance with eating. The resident was on aspiration precautions related to history of Dysphagia and interventions included diet to be followed as prescribed. Record review of Resident #2's admission Record, dated 04/05/24, revealed a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease (type of dementia that effects memory, thinking, and behavior) with early onset, Wernicke's encephalopathy (type of brain injury that occurs due to a thiamine deficiency), hypertensive heart disease (group of heart conditions caused by high blood pressure), and increased secretion of gastrin (production and release of hormone made by digestive system). Record review of Resident #2's physician orders, undated, read in part .NAS diet, pureed texture, nectar thickened consistency, pleasure feed only for dysphasia, ordered 03/03/24, start 03/03/24 . Record review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 02/15/24, revealed the BIMS was not completed as resident was rarely/never understood. Further review revealed he was dependent with feeding. Section K0520, 3. While a Resident, C. Mechanical altered diet and D. Therapeutic diet were checked. Record review of Resident #2's, undated, care plan revealed he had an ADL self-care performance deficit and required extensive one-person assistance with eating. Further review revealed he required a NAS, mechanical soft texture, nectar thickened consistency diet for dysphagia and interventions included to provide and serve diet as ordered and RD to evaluate and make diet change recommendations PRN, date initiated/created: 05/10/23 and revision on 08/08/23. Observation and interview on 04/01/24 at 12:47 a.m., revealed smothered chicken, lemon rice, chateau vegetables, dinner roll, whole milk, water, and bread pudding was on the lunch menu. Residents #1 and #2 ate their meal in the dining room. Both residents were served the correct pureed food items. Observation and interview on 04/03/24 at 10:50 a.m., revealed Resident #1 was lying in bed watching television. He said he was doing alright. He said he did not remember having oatmeal for breakfast or if they ordered donuts and kolaches this past week on Friday, 03/29/24. In an interview on 04/01/24 at 2:40 p.m., CNA B said she worked 6:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. on Friday, 03/29/24. She said she believed that was the day they had to order breakfast for the residents. She said she texted the Administrator, DON, and ADON at 7:19 a.m. to let them know that there was no one in the kitchen. She said she also told the Charge Nurse that there was no dietary staff at the facility and said the Charge Nurse called the DON. She said kolaches and donuts were ordered for the residents and a resident's family member brought a jug of apple and orange juice. She said she believed the ADON arrived at approximately 8 a.m. and opened the kitchen door. She said kolaches and donuts were served to the residents who were not on a special diet. She said nothing was ordered for the residents who were on a pureed diet. She said as far as she remembered, Residents #1 and #2 were the only residents who were on a pureed diet. She said she went to the kitchen and made 6 bowls of oatmeal and grabbed some pre-made orange juice, milk, and water. She said she asked the Charge Nurse if Residents #1 and #2 could have the oatmeal to eat and the orange juice, milk, and water to drink and she said yes. She said she stayed in the dining room during breakfast time and fed Resident #1. She said residents on a pureed diet who received the wrong type of foods to eat could aspirate, have a hard time chewing, and/or difficulty swallowing. In an interview on 04/01/24 at 3:39 p.m., Nurse A said she worked 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on 03/29/24. She said kolaches and donuts were ordered for breakfast. She said oatmeal, cold cereal, milk, and juice was also available for the residents. She said the kitchen staff arrived after they finished with breakfast and said she did not know what happened with them. She said the Administrator and DON were notified, she did not know by whom, but said she was going to call them, but was told they already called. She said she did not pass breakfast that morning. She said she was given 2 bowls of oatmeal, thickened juice, a thickened strawberry health shake, and thickened water for Resident #2. She said the residents who were on a mechanical soft diet got cereal and oatmeal. She said the oatmeal was already in a pureed consistency just the way it was made. She said she knew this from her 36 years of nursing and looking at a pureed consistency. She said the oatmeal was really, really, soft, and easy for the residents to swallow. She said if a resident was on a pureed diet and got the wrong foods to eat, they could choke if it they were on the diet for chewing and/or swallowing. In an interview on 04/01/24 at 4:02 p.m., ADON, said there was no dietary staff on 03/29/24 to make breakfast. She said the facility ordered kolaches and donuts for the residents to eat. She said apple juice oatmeal, cream of wheat, dry cereal, and premade water, milk, orange juice, thickened liquids, and some kind of custard was provided to the residents who were on a pureed diet. She said CNA B made the oatmeal that morning. She said Residents #1 and #2 were on a pureed diet. She said those 2 residents may have been served oatmeal, custard, and their liquid drinks. She said Resident #1 was on thin liquids and Resident #2 was on nectar thickened. She said she did not know what happened to the dietary staff. She said Resident #2 got 2 bowls of oatmeal. She said she believed everyone got everything they were supposed to. She said if a resident was given the wrong food to eat, they could aspirate. In an interview on 04/03/24 at 9:06 a.m., the DON said she was notified by telephone and text message a little before 7:30 a.m. on 3/29/24 by the Charge Nurse telling her that no one had shown up in the kitchen yet. She said after she was notified, she called the Administrator, and the Administrator called the Regional Nurse [NAME] to let her know. She said [NAME] said to go ahead and order breakfast. She said breakfast was ordered and delivered to the building. She said she was told they had delivered donuts, kolaches, oatmeal, and did not remember if they ordered cereal or got the cereal from the kitchen. She said Residents #1 and #2 were on a pureed diet. She said she did not know what they were served and did not ask. In an interview on 04/03/24 at 9:58 a.m., the Dietary Manager said she worked Monday through Friday, from 6:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. and was responsible for making the dietary aide schedule. She said on Thursday, 03/28/24, at approximately 2:25 p.m. she was placed on a 3-day suspension. She said the dietary staff schedule for that week had already been made. She said [NAME] A told her she could not work on Fridays, and some other days, on the previous day, Thursday, 03/28/24, between 2:00 p.m. and 2:30 p.m. She said Dietary Aide B was supposed to work Friday, 03/29/24, from 6:00 a.m. to 1:30 p.m., and on Saturday and Sunday from 6:00 a.m. to 7:30 p.m. She said Dietary Aide B sent her a text message Friday morning, 3/29/24, at approximately 8:00 a.m. telling her that she quit. She said she did not let management, or the workers know because she was on suspension. She said oatmeal did not need to be pureed. She said it was all about preparation. She said by preparation she meant that the box directions needed to be followed to a T. She said Residents #1 and #2 were on a pureed diet. In a telephone interview on 04/03/24 at 10:35 a.m., the Dietician said she had been contracted since November 2023 and spent 10 hours per month at the facility. She said she would not think oatmeal was in its pureed form. She said it should be put into a blender and water should be added until it formed the right consistency that the resident needed. She said Residents # 1 and #2 should be eating pureed oatmeal because regular oatmeal was too thick. She said eating regular oatmeal could lead to choking, food getting into their lungs, and/or more significant food scenarios. Record review of the facility's policy titled Therapeutic Diets, reviewed [DATE], read in part . a therapeutic diet is considered a diet ordered by a physician, practitioner, or dietitian as part of treatment for a disease or clinical condition, to modify specific nutrients in the diet or to alter the texture of a diet . Record review of the facility's policy titled Food and Nutrition Services, dated October 2022, read in part . each resident is provided with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs .
Mar 2024 2 deficiencies 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident was free from abuse for one (Resident #1) of f...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident was free from abuse for one (Resident #1) of fifty- one residents reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to prevent the AD from verbally abusing Resident #1. The AD made the statement where I come form snitches get stitches and end up in ditches. This failure could place 51 residents who participate in activities at risk of verbal abuse and decreased quality of life. Findings Included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated [DATE] revealed a [AGE] year-old woman who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her admitting diagnoses were a cerebral infraction (area of tissue death to the brain), cognitive communication deficit (difficulty with thinking and using language), depression, and COPD (lung disease). Record review of Resident #1's MDS completed [DATE], revealed a BIMS (interview to determine a resident's mental status) score of 14 (cognitively intact). Record review of Resident #2's face sheet dated [DATE] revealed a [AGE] year-old woman who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her admitting diagnoses were unspecified fracture of lower limb of right femur, cellulitis of left lower limb, cognitive communication deficit (difficulty with thinking and using language), COPD (lung disease), and depression. Record review of Resident #1's MDS 3.0 completed [DATE], revealed a BIMS (interview to determine a resident's mental status) score of 13 (cognitively intact). Record review of the facility'sgrievance log from January- [DATE] revealed there were not any concerns regarding staff customer service or activities. In an interview on [DATE] at 12:57 pm with the SW, she stated that she attended a care plan meeting for Resident #1 on [DATE]. In attendance were the DON, Admin, and members of Resident #1's family. During the meeting the resident stated that she felt that the AD did not like her and had not liked her since her admission in February of 2024. She stated that earlier that week, the activities director told her Snitches get stitches and end up in ditches. That was the first time any of the staff had heard that and they immediately asked her what happened. The Administrator intervened and told her she would speak to her in private after the care plan meeting. The police were called on site and Resident #1 and the AD were asked to give statements. The psychiatrist was also requested at the facility and arrived the following day on [DATE]. The SW said she followed up with the resident later on [DATE] and asked her how she was feeling. Resident #1 stated that she felt threatened when she heard AD make the comment about stitches. Although she currently felt stressed, she felt better now that everything was out in the open and she was happy that staff were aware so that they could keep an eye on the AD and the resident. The SW stated that the AD had been suspended while the investigation was ongoing and that she had not received any grievances or complaints about the AD. In addition to activities, the AD was head of the resident council, and she would document any grievances from residents and give them to the Admin or DON. The SW stated that she had received training on abuse and neglect the week prior and on [DATE]. In an interview on [DATE] at 1:13 pm, Resident #1 stated that she had been at the facility for about a month and although residents at the facility went on a weekly store outing, she had not been on one since she had arrived. She explained that every time she would ask the AD, there would be an excuse such as the bus was full and she had already picked who she wanted to ride with her. The van the facility used was only able to accommodate so many wheelchairs, but the AD would never schedule her for a different outing/day. On [DATE], Resident #1 told the DON about that, and the DON said she would speak with the AD and make sure that she could go on the next one. Following that, Resident #1 and Resident #2 were sitting in the designated smoking area outside of the facility. The AD came outside and stated Where I come from, snitches get stitches and wind up in ditches. Resident #1 was not sure if this was directed to her but it was said within earshot. Resident #1 felt like the AD was always on her case because Resident #1 did not prefer the activities she provided. On [DATE], the resident was in the hallway and CNA A, who is related to the AD, got too close to her wheelchair and she accidentally ran over her foot. She stated I told her (CNA A) a thousand times do not get too close to my wheelchair and she put her foot directly in front of my wheel. I didn't move fast enough and her foot got caught underneath my wheelchair. CNA A let out a loud scream and staff came to assist her. Resident #1 expressed that the AD was taunting her the following day and told her that she was going to sue the facility and Resident #1. Resident #1 responded that she did not have anything to sue for and the only reason that she was at the facility was because they accepted her insurance. She stated that that along with the comment about snitches, was her last straw and prompted her family to bring up these issues in the care plan meeting. She stated that she did not tell anyone in the facility because she did not want and problems and only wanted piece. She revealed that after her family brought up with situation in the care plan meeting, she felt a sense of relief that the behaviors from the AD were out in the open and that now people from the facility could be watch both the AD and herself. In an interview on [DATE] with the LVN at 2:23 pm, she stated that she saw when Resident #1's electric wheelchair was on CNA A's foot mid-day on [DATE]. She explained that Resident #1 did not have good peripheral vision and explained that she did not respond fast because she was not a quick thinker. She believed that it truly was an accident and did not feel that Resident #1 intentionally ran over the CNA's foot. The CNA left the facility and went to the hospital and came back on [DATE] wearing a boot on her foot. In an interview on [DATE] at 03:02 pm with the AD, she explained that every month she would take 12-13 residents on a trip of their choice around the county, but she also had to account for the amount of staff who must go to help with residents in wheelchairs. When asked if she kept a list, she stated that she did write it down, but she did not keep a list per visit and she apologized for not keeping up with it. She stated that on Monday's, she would get a list of things that residents requested from the store and take one person to accompany her. She stated that she absolutely did not make the statement where I come from snitches get stitches and end up in ditches and she had never taunted Resident #1. The AD said that she did not know why Resident #1 had a vendetta against her and assumed that her problem could be that Resident #1 wanted to smoke in areas outside of the designated smoking area. During a monthly outing, The AD caught Resident #2 eating a cake inside of the grocery store and she told her that she could go to jail for that. When they returned, she reported Resident #2 to the facility. The AD believed that Residents #1 and #2 were targeting her. When asked if she had been outside with Resident #1 in the designated smoking area, she said maybe, because she was always out there. An attempted interview call was made to CNA A on [DATE] at 03:22 pm. She did not answer and a voicemail was left requesting a call back. In an interview on [DATE] at 03:21 pm with the DON, she recounted that her first time hearing of the behavior between the AD and Resident #1 was at the care plan meeting on [DATE]. A family member of Resident #1 was first to bring it up and Resident #1 stated that the AD said something regarding snitches getting stitches and ending up in ditches. After that was revealed, the staff quickly finished the care plan meeting, and the Administrator began to investigate it because she knew it would be a reportable offense. She had no knowledge of their being any type of static between the AD and Resident #1. She stated that the facility's administration always spoke about abuse and neglect with staff and told the residents that they would want to know those things. In an interview on [DATE] at 03:50 pm with the Admin, she revealed that a care plan meeting was scheduled with Resident #1 and her family because there were some challenges with her following the facility rules. The IDT discussed the idea of switching the resident from a motorized to a mechanical wheelchair and the family understood. When a member of the family mentioned the statement of snitches, the Admin told them that the statement sounded like verbal abuse and a threat. The family stated that they did not believe that Resident #1 was threatened by the AD, but they did want the facility to follow up on the process, which would be to contact the state and the police. The Admin revealed that a witness to the incident was Resident #2, and she stated that the AD did not say it directly to her Resident #1, but she did say it in the air and labeled it as trash or street talk. When the police arrived, Resident #1 was questioned and she stated that she did not want to press charges, however the Admin felt that she needed to be more professional and they always covered topics like customer service in the all staff meeting. The police came to the facility on the afternoon of [DATE] and interviewed Resident #1, Resident #2, and the AD. Resident #1 did not state that the statement from the AD was made directly to her, but she felt strongly that the AD was talking indirectly about her when she said it. Resident #1 told the police that she did not want to press charges, but she was glad that this situation was now in the open. The AD was suspended from work pending the outcome of the investigation and Admin had scheduled an all staff meeting on [DATE] to begin in-services. She stated that a solution going forward may be to separate staff and resident smoking areas and she would be terminating the AD after she discussed the findings with the surveyor after their investigation. When the Admin spoke about the incident where Resident #1 ran over CNA A's foot, she stated that she did not do it on purpose, but she thought that the AD probably thought it was something more serious because her CNA A was in her 70's. After the incident, the facility felt they should transition Resident #1 to a manuall wheelchair. In an interview on [DATE] at 09:30 am, Resident #2 said that the outing last week to the store was horrible. She explained that she ate a banana in the grocery store and that she was from a small town and that was what they did. The AD was very loud when she confronted her and said that's theft!. She stated that made her feel bad and she explained that she had another banana in her basket to weigh at the register so she could pay for the one she ate prior to being confronted. Resident #2 felt that the AD did not speak kindly. She received a phone call during this interview and it was continued at a later time. In an interview on [DATE] at 10:11 am with CNA B, she stated that she had heard the AD say y'all asses are ungrateful. I spent my money on these gifts and y'all don't like it after a game of bingo with the Residents. She explained that the AD had prizes like popcorn, chips, and candy that she purchased out of pocket, but it still did not give her the right to speak like that. Resident #1 was called ungrateful because she had won a headband in bingo, but because Resident #1 only had one functioning arm, she could not use it. CNA B stated that she witnessed the incident between the AD and Resident #1. Afterwards, CNA B stated that she told Resident #1 that she needed to report that incident to the abuse coordinator (Admin). CNA B stated the outburst exhibited by the AD was not an isolated incident and that she believed some residents were afraid. In the follow up interview with Resident #2 on [DATE] at 10:26 am, she recapped that when the AD made the comment about snitches lie in ditches, she had come to the smoking area after Resident #1 and Resident #2 were outside. Resident #2 referred to her comment as slang and said that it didn't bother her, she would just take her comments and try to keep her mouth shut. She stated that she thought that the AD came outside and made the comment because she heard from another employee that Resident #1 told on her to the DON. She felt that the DON did not make the statement directly to Resident #1 and herself, but she said it aloud while they were gathered in the facility smoking area and they were the only 3 people outside. Resident #2 also added that the AD would tell the residents what she bought for bingo, and she would say that she would not ever spend a dime on them. Resident #2 stated that it was not the residents' problem, to have to worry about the finances of stuff, but they heard thenAD speak about it anyways. She recalled a time that Resident #1 asked her what time bingo was and the AD replied There won't be none because I'm tired of spending money around here. The AD also was real ugly about letting Resident #1 know that she was responsible for CNA's foot. Resident #2 stated that We have already enough heck going on. It makes me feel like wow, this is the authority, this is the leadership up here. It makes me feel like Bologna. It's not good to live up here. In a follow up interview on [DATE] at 12:08 pm, CNA B was asked why she did not report any behaviors from the AD to the Admin. She stated that she was honestly in shock when she heard the AD say it. She did not know how the AD would come at her because she was rude and she wanted to avoid the confrontation. She admitted that she was supposed to tell the Admin and she felt comfortable with telling her things like that. She stated that when she heard the comment made by the AD, The steps would be to not address her but follow the chain of command and go to the abuse coordinator (Admin). After, the Admin would do an investigation. She did not feel like the AD would necessarily retaliate, but there would be some kind of tension. She said she knew she should have reported it, but she liked to come to work where things were peaceful and everybody got along. In a follow up interview on [DATE] at 12:15 pm with the Admin, she told the surveyor that she would be writing up CNA B for not informing her about the incident she overheard with the AD and Resident #1. Admin stated that staff talked about abuse and neglect often, and they recently had an in-service on abuse and neglect and how to report it to the abuse and neglect coordinator (Admin). She said that AD and CNA B's behavior was unacceptable. Admin also stated that she had been working at that facility for over 20 years and she promoted a see something, say something policy. She also stated that she had no knowledge that the AD had spoken to Resident #2 in a way that made her feel bad when she was at the grocery store during the facility's last outing. Record review of an in-service Titled Resident to Resident Altercation, Verbal Abuse and Neglect dated [DATE] revealed that CNA A, CNA B, and the AD were not in attendance. Record review of an in-service titled Abuse, neglect, workplace violence dated [DATE] revealed CNA A and the AD were in attendance. Record review of the AD's employee personnel file of her nurse aid registry documents revealed that her license expired on [DATE]. The Admin provided an extension document from the TX Nurse Aide registry that revealed HHSC is extending a grace period for all nurse aides to all users time to learn and understand the new credentialing systems. All Nurse aides approvals active on [DATE], will be considered active until [DATE]. Record review of the facility's Abuse Prohibition Policy revised [DATE] specified the facility will prohibit neglect, mental or physical abuse, mistreatment, neglect, corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, and financial abuse. Record review of the facility's policy titled Resident rights, revised February 2021, specified that Federal and state laws guarantee certain basic rights to all residents of this facility. These rights include the resident's right to: a. Be treated with respect, kindness, and dignity. b. Be free from abuse and neglect c. Voice grievances to the facility, or other agencies that hears grievances, without discrimination or reprisal and without fear of discrimination or reprisal. d. Have the facility respond to his or her grievances.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mist...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, for one (Resident #1) of fifty- one residents reviewed for abuse. CNA B failed to report verbal abuse from the AD to Resident #1 to the Administrator. This failure could place 51 residents who participate in activities at risk of verbal abuse and decreased quality of life. Findings Included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated [DATE] revealed a [AGE] year-old woman who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her admitting diagnoses were a cerebral infraction (area of tissue death to the brain), cognitive communication deficit (difficulty with thinking and using language), depression, and COPD (lung disease). Record review of Resident #1's MDS completed [DATE], revealed a BIMS (interview to determine a resident's mental status) score of 14 (cognitively intact). Record review of Resident #2's face sheet dated [DATE] revealed a [AGE] year-old woman who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her admitting diagnoses were unspecified fracture of lower limb of right femur, cellulitis of left lower limb, cognitive communication deficit (difficulty with thinking and using language), COPD (lung disease), and depression. Record review of Resident #1's MDS 3.0 completed [DATE], revealed a BIMS (interview to determine a resident's mental status) score of 13 (cognitively intact). Record review of the facility'sgrievance log from January- [DATE] revealed there were not any concerns regarding staff customer service or activities. In an interview on [DATE] at 12:57 pm with the SW, she stated that she attended a care plan meeting for Resident #1 on [DATE]. In attendance were the DON, Admin, and members of Resident #1's family. During the meeting the resident stated that she felt that the AD did not like her and had not liked her since her admission in February of 2024. She stated that earlier that week, the activities director told her Snitches get stitches and end up in ditches. That was the first time any of the staff had heard that and they immediately asked her what happened. The Administrator intervened and told her she would speak to her in private after the care plan meeting. The police were called on site and Resident #1 and the AD were asked to give statements. The psychiatrist was also requested at the facility and arrived the following day on [DATE]. The SW said she followed up with the resident later on [DATE] and asked her how she was feeling. Resident #1 stated that she felt threatened when she heard AD make the comment about stitches. Although she currently felt stressed, she felt better now that everything was out in the open and she was happy that staff were aware so that they could keep an eye on the AD and the resident. The SW stated that the AD had been suspended while the investigation was ongoing and that she had not received any grievances or complaints about the AD. In addition to activities, the AD was head of the resident council, and she would document any grievances from residents and give them to the Admin or DON. The SW stated that she had received training on abuse and neglect the week prior and on [DATE]. In an interview on [DATE] at 1:13 pm, Resident #1 stated that she had been at the facility for about a month and although residents at the facility went on a weekly store outing, she had not been on one since she had arrived. She explained that every time she would ask the AD, there would be an excuse such as the bus was full and she had already picked who she wanted to ride with her. The van the facility used was only able to accommodate so many wheelchairs, but the AD would never schedule her for a different outing/day. On [DATE], Resident #1 told the DON about that, and the DON said she would speak with the AD and make sure that she could go on the next one. Following that, Resident #1 and Resident #2 were sitting in the designated smoking area outside of the facility. The AD came outside and stated Where I come from, snitches get stitches and wind up in ditches. Resident #1 was not sure if this was directed to her but it was said within earshot. Resident #1 felt like the AD was always on her case because Resident #1 did not prefer the activities she provided. On [DATE], the resident was in the hallway and CNA A, who is related to the AD, got too close to her wheelchair and she accidentally ran over her foot. She stated I told her (CNA A) a thousand times do not get too close to my wheelchair and she put her foot directly in front of my wheel. I didn't move fast enough and her foot got caught underneath my wheelchair. CNA A let out a loud scream and staff came to assist her. Resident #1 expressed that the AD was taunting her the following day and told her that she was going to sue the facility and Resident #1. Resident #1 responded that she did not have anything to sue for and the only reason that she was at the facility was because they accepted her insurance. She stated that that along with the comment about snitches, was her last straw and prompted her family to bring up these issues in the care plan meeting. She stated that she did not tell anyone in the facility because she did not want and problems and only wanted piece. She revealed that after her family brought up with situation in the care plan meeting, she felt a sense of relief that the behaviors from the AD were out in the open and that now people from the facility could be watch both the AD and herself. In an interview on [DATE] with the LVN at 2:23 pm, she stated that she saw when Resident #1's electric wheelchair was on CNA A's foot mid-day on [DATE]. She explained that Resident #1 did not have good peripheral vision and explained that she did not respond fast because she was not a quick thinker. She believed that it truly was an accident and did not feel that Resident #1 intentionally ran over the CNA's foot. The CNA left the facility and went to the hospital and came back on [DATE] wearing a boot on her foot. In an interview on [DATE] at 03:02 pm with the AD, she explained that every month she would take 12-13 residents on a trip of their choice around the county, but she also had to account for the amount of staff who must go to help with residents in wheelchairs. When asked if she kept a list, she stated that she did write it down, but she did not keep a list per visit and she apologized for not keeping up with it. She stated that on Monday's, she would get a list of things that residents requested from the store and take one person to accompany her. She stated that she absolutely did not make the statement where I come from snitches get stitches and end up in ditches and she had never taunted Resident #1. The AD said that she did not know why Resident #1 had a vendetta against her and assumed that her problem could be that Resident #1 wanted to smoke in areas outside of the designated smoking area. During a monthly outing, The AD caught Resident #2 eating a cake inside of the grocery store and she told her that she could go to jail for that. When they returned, she reported Resident #2 to the facility. The AD believed that Residents #1 and #2 were targeting her. When asked if she had been outside with Resident #1 in the designated smoking area, she said maybe, because she was always out there. An attempted interview call was made to CNA A on [DATE] at 03:22 pm. She did not answer and a voicemail was left requesting a call back. In an interview on [DATE] at 03:21 pm with the DON, she recounted that her first time hearing of the behavior between the AD and Resident #1 was at the care plan meeting on [DATE]. A family member of Resident #1 was first to bring it up and Resident #1 stated that the AD said something regarding snitches getting stitches and ending up in ditches. After that was revealed, the staff quickly finished the care plan meeting, and the Administrator began to investigate it because she knew it would be a reportable offense. She had no knowledge of their being any type of static between the AD and Resident #1. She stated that the facility's administration always spoke about abuse and neglect with staff and told the residents that they would want to know those things. In an interview on [DATE] at 03:50 pm with the Admin, she revealed that a care plan meeting was scheduled with Resident #1 and her family because there were some challenges with her following the facility rules. The IDT discussed the idea of switching the resident from a motorized to a mechanical wheelchair and the family understood. When a member of the family mentioned the statement of snitches, the Admin told them that the statement sounded like verbal abuse and a threat. The family stated that they did not believe that Resident #1 was threatened by the AD, but they did want the facility to follow up on the process, which would be to contact the state and the police. The Admin revealed that a witness to the incident was Resident #2, and she stated that the AD did not say it directly to her Resident #1, but she did say it in the air and labeled it as trash or street talk. When the police arrived, Resident #1 was questioned and she stated that she did not want to press charges, however the Admin felt that she needed to be more professional and they always covered topics like customer service in the all staff meeting. The police came to the facility on the afternoon of [DATE] and interviewed Resident #1, Resident #2, and the AD. Resident #1 did not state that the statement from the AD was made directly to her, but she felt strongly that the AD was talking indirectly about her when she said it. Resident #1 told the police that she did not want to press charges, but she was glad that this situation was now in the open. The AD was suspended from work pending the outcome of the investigation and Admin had scheduled an all staff meeting on [DATE] to begin in-services. She stated that a solution going forward may be to separate staff and resident smoking areas.When the Adminspoke about the incident where Resident #1 ran over CNA A's foot, she stated that she did not do it on purpose, but she thought that the AD probably thought it was something more serious because her CNA A was in her 70's. After the incident, the facility felt they should transition Resident #1 to a manuall wheelchair. In an interview on [DATE] at 09:30 am, Resident #2 said that the outing last week to the store was horrible. She explained that she ate a banana in the grocery store and that she was from a small town and that was what they did. The AD was very loud when she confronted her and said that's theft!. She stated that made her feel bad and she explained that she had another banana in her basket to weigh at the register so she could pay for the one she ate prior to being confronted. Resident #2 felt that the AD did not speak kindly. She received a phone call during this interview and it was continued at a later time. In an interview on [DATE] at 10:11 am with CNA B, she stated that she had heard the AD say y'all asses are ungrateful. I spent my money on these gifts and y'all don't like it after a game of bingo with the Residents. She explained that the AD had prizes like popcorn, chips, and candy that she purchased out of pocket, but it still did not give her the right to speak like that. Resident #1 was called ungrateful because she had won a headband in bingo, but because Resident #1 only had one functioning arm, she could not use it. CNA B stated that she witnessed the incident between the AD and Resident #1. Afterwards, CNA B stated that she told Resident #1 that she needed to report that incident to the abuse coordinator (Admin). CNA B stated the outburst exhibited by the AD was not an isolated incident and that she believed some residents were afraid. In the follow up interview with Resident #2 on [DATE] at 10:26 am, she recapped that when the AD made the comment about snitches lie in ditches, she had come to the smoking area after Resident #1 and Resident #2 were outside. Resident #2 referred to her comment as slang and said that it didn't bother her, she would just take her comments and try to keep her mouth shut. She stated that she thought that the AD came outside and made the comment because she heard from another employee that Resident #1 told on her to the DON. She felt that the DON did not make the statement directly to Resident #1 and herself, but she said it aloud while they were gathered in the facility smoking area and they were the only 3 people outside. Resident #2 also added that the AD would tell the residents what she bought for bingo, and she would say that she would not ever spend a dime on them. Resident #2 stated that it was not the residents' problem, to have to worry about the finances of stuff, but they heard thenAD speak about it anyways. She recalled a time that Resident #1 asked her what time bingo was and the AD replied There won't be none because I'm tired of spending money around here. The AD also was real ugly about letting Resident #1 know that she was responsible for CNA's foot. Resident #2 stated that We have already enough heck going on. It makes me feel like wow, this is the authority, this is the leadership up here. It makes me feel like Bologna. It's not good to live up here. In a follow up interview on [DATE] at 12:08 pm, CNA B was asked why she did not report any behaviors from the AD to the Admin. She stated that she was honestly in shock when she heard the AD say it. She did not know how the AD would come at her because she was rude and she wanted to avoid the confrontation. She admitted that she was supposed to tell the Admin and she felt comfortable with telling her things like that. She stated that when she heard the comment made by the AD, The steps would be to not address her but follow the chain of command and go to the abuse coordinator (Admin). After, the Admin would do an investigation. She did not feel like the AD would necessarily retaliate, but there would be some kind of tension. She said she knew she should have reported it, but she liked to come to work where things were peaceful and everybody got along. In a follow up interview on [DATE] at 12:15 pm with the Admin, she told the surveyor that she would be writing up CNA B for not informing her about the incident she overheard with the AD and Resident #1. Admin stated that staff talked about abuse and neglect often, and they recently had an inservice on abuse and neglect and how to report it to the abuse and neglect coordinator (Admin). She said that AD and CNA B's behavior was unacceptable. Admin also stated that she had been working at that facility for over 20 years and she promoted a see something, say something policy. Record review of an in-service Titled Resident to Resident Altercation, Verbal Abuse and Neglect dated [DATE] revealed that CNA A, CNA B, and the AD were not in attendance. Record review of an in-service titled Abuse, neglect, workplace violence dated [DATE] revealed CNA A and the AD were in attendance. Record review of the AD's employee personnel file of her nurse aid registry documents revealed that her license expired on [DATE]. The Admin provided an extension document from the TX Nurse Aide registry that revealed HHSC is extending a grace period for all nurse aides to all users time to learn and understand the new credentialing systems. All Nurse aides approvals active on [DATE], will be considered active until [DATE]. Record review of the facility's Abuse Prohibition Policy revised [DATE] specified the facility will prohibit neglect, mental or physical abuse, mistreatment, neglect, corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, and financial abuse. Record review of the facility's policy titled Resident rights, revised February 2021, specified that Federal and state laws guarantee certain basic rights to all residents of this facility. These rights include the resident's right to: a. Be treated with respect, kindness, and dignity. b. Be free from abuse and neglect c. Voice grievances to the facility, or other agencies that hears grievances, without discrimination or reprisal and without fear of discrimination or reprisal. d. Have the facility respond to his or her grievances.
Mar 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activit...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed for ADLs. -The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 received timely incontinence care. This failure could put residents at risk for discomfort, infection, and dignity issues. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's admission Record, dated 03/13/24, revealed a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's diagnoses included cerebral infarction (stroke), muscle weakness, need for assistance with personal care, contracture (permanent tightening of the muscles, tendons, skin, and surrounding tissues that causes the joints to shorten and stiffen) left shoulder, and contracture of muscle, multiple sites. Record review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 02/29/24, revealed a BIMS score of 15, indicating intact cognitive skills. Further review revealed she required substantial/maximal assistance with toileting and dressing and partial/moderate assistance with bathing. Record review of Resident #1's undated care plan revealed she required staff assistance/total assist from staff for meeting emotional, intellectual, physical, and social needs related to physical limitations. The resident required extensive assistance with bed mobility, transfers, and toileting. The resident had bowel/bladder incontinence related to impaired mobility and loss of peritoneal/bowel tone. Observation on 03/13/24 from 9:35 a.m. to 10:05 a.m., revealed Resident #1's call light was on and sounding at the nurse's station on hall #2. MA A was at one end of hall #2 doing medication pass and no other call lights were on during this timeframe. Observation on 03/13/24 at 9:47 a.m., Nurse A came out of Resident #2's room, walked past the nurse's station to the medication cart, got something out, returned back to the resident's room, and closed the door behind her. Observation and interview on 03/13/24 at 10:04 a.m., revealed Resident #1's call light was still on, and Nurse A was still in Resident #2's room. MA A said she believed CNA B was in the room with Nurse A. Observation and interview on 03/13/24 at 10:06 a.m., revealed the Administrator went inside Resident #1's room for approximately 1 minute, turned off the call light, and then came out of her room. The Administrator said the resident told her she had a bowel movement and needed to be changed. Observation and interview on 03/13/24 at 10:06 a.m., revealed Resident #1 was lying in bed. She said she needed to be changed. She said the wait time for staff to change her varied. She said sometimes she had to wait for staff to finish helping other residents and sometimes staff came right away. She said staff would be there soon to change her. There were no odors in the room. Observation on 03/13/24 at 10:11 a.m., revealed the Activities Director entered Resident #1's room and came out shortly after. Observation on 03/13/24 at 10:14 a.m., revealed the Activities Director asked CNA C, who was walking toward Hall #2, to help her change Resident #1. They entered the resident's room and closed the door. In an interview on 03/13/24 at 7:45 a.m., CNA B said Nurse A, MA A, and herself were assigned to hall #2. In an interview on 03/13/24 at 2:27 p.m., the Activities Director, who said she was also a CNA, said she had been working at the facility since 10/2023. She said her work hours were 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. but she would arrive around 8:20 a.m. She said in the past she helped with answering call lights, changing residents, getting the residents up, and with the resident's overall ADL care. She said she felt at times they had enough staff on the floor and at other times not enough staff. She said the staff on hall #2, Nurse A, CNA B and MA A, did not let her know they were going to be unavailable to answer call lights. She said she was not sure how long Resident #1's call light was on. She said she asked Resident #1 how long she had been waiting and the resident told her she had it on since after breakfast. She said she felt there were not enough staff on the floor today. She said as far as she was aware, the facility tried to call in additional staff to help when needed and that they did not use agency. She said she was not considered a floater but helped when she was needed. In an interview on 03/13/24 at 3:15 p.m., the DON said she felt there was enough nursing staff on shift. She said that MA A and the Activities Director were also CNAs, and Transportation/Floater was a CNA and MA. She said if a resident was a two person assist and both staff were assisting 1 resident together, they knew they should have informed the other nursing staff on hall #1. In an interview on 03/13/24 at 4:08 p.m., CNA B said she was assisting Resident #2 with his care between 9:00 a.m. and 10:00 a.m. when Nurse A walked in with the resident's wound care stuff. She said Nurse A closed the door and when she finished assisting the resident, she helped Nurse A with his wound care. She said it did not take that long to do his wound care, approximately 15 minutes. She said after they finished, Nurse A left, and she stayed behind to gather the linens and move his table back which took approximately an additional 7 minutes. She said she did not ask Nurse A if she let anyone know that they were going to be in the resident's room. She said no call lights were going off when she went in Resident #2's room. She said when she came out, they told her they changed Resident #1 for her. She said she checked on Resident #1 first thing this morning at approximately 7:45 a.m. and between 8:30 a.m. and 9:00 a.m. She said after the last time she checked on Resident #1, she got pulled into Resident #2's room. She said sometimes she felt they were understaffed and sometimes not. She said she normally told the MA, nurse, or someone else that she was going to be helping a resident. She said if it took 2 of them to assist a resident, she would let hall #1 know if help was needed. She said she had 19 residents on Hall #2. In an interview on 03/1324 at 4:29 p.m., the Administrator said the census determined the facility's staffing needs. She said they got so many hours per day based on the residents' needs because the census could change daily. She said typically, it was a ratio for the resident vs. staff member. She said she was always a little bit overstaffed because she had people in different departments that she could use on the floor. She said she hired people with multiple certifications i.e., the Activities Director was a CNA and transportation had her CNA and MA certifications. She said today her 3 CNAs were CNA B, CNA C, and CNA D/ Floater who did transportation as well. She said she did not have 3 CNAs on the floor right now. She said staffing needs would always be based on residents because even with the patient per day ratio it was always based on the number of residents. She said they have not had to use agency in a long-time because they had enough permanent staff and staff that would pick up shifts. She said she followed the hourly patient per day ratio of residents vs. staff member. In an interview on 03/13/24 at 4:38 p.m., the DON said CNA D was at the facility this morning but left at 7:00 a.m. to take a resident to an appointment. She said she was not on the floor right now because she just left and took a resident to the ER for a change in condition but not a 911 change in condition. In an interview on 03/13/24 at 4:50 p.m., MA A said she remembered that Resident #1's call light went off a couple of minutes before she started her medication pass. She said she checked on Resident #1 and she said she wanted to get changed. She said she told her she would go and find her CNA and turned off the call light. She said she found CNA B who was in Resident #2's room. She said she told CNA B when she was finished with Resident #2, Resident #1 wanted to be changed. She said she was not able to change Resident #1 because she started her medication pass. She said Resident #1's call light went off a second time, but she did not answer it because she was in the middle of medication pass. She said she did not let another staff member know because she thought in her mind that CNA B was going to go down to Resident #1's room and change her. She said as a rule, if a call light was going off, she would stop what she was doing as long as she did not pop that first pill because she did not want to make a medication error. She said they have been told they were supposed to find someone to help when needed. She said she did not tell anyone help was needed because she thought CNA B was going to Resident #1's room after a few minutes. She said she was not aware that Resident #1's call light was going off for 30 minutes. She said she thought the breakdown was that no one was conscious of the time. She said there was usually 3 CNAs working on the floor but today there were only a total of 2 CNAs on the floor. She said this could have potentially resulted in a breakdown of the skin on Resident #1's bottom. In an interview on 03/13/24 at 5:20 p.m., Nurse A said Resident #1's light was not going off prior to going and doing wound care for Resident #2. She said CNA B was already in Resident #2's room and she had CNA B assist her with Resident #2's wound care. She said she did not recall hearing a beep going off when she came out of Resident #2's room to get xeroform from the medication cart. She said she did not tell anyone that CNA B and she were going to be doing wound care, but she said she was told by the Administrator, afterwards, to let Administration know so they could hang out on the hallway to assist residents with whatever they needed while they were tied up with resident care. She said she did not feel there was enough staff on the floor. In an interview on 03/13/24 at 5:55 p.m., CNA D/Transportation/Floater said she was certified to transport residents, was a CNA, and a MA. She said she arrived at the facility today at approximately 5:15 a.m. She said when she arrived, she put and made sure supplies were on the CNAs carts and got a couple of residents up. She said she left the facility at approximately 6:30 a.m. to transport Resident #3 to the cardiologist and arrived back to the facility between 8:30 a.m. and 9:00 a.m. She said when she got back to the facility, she assisted Hall #1. She said between 12:00 p.m. and 12:30 p.m. she left and took Resident #4 to a doctor's appointment and returned at approximately 12:40 p.m. She said she helped pass and pick up meal trays on Hall #1 and #2. She said she then left at about 1:15 p.m. to take Resident #5 to the hospital to see the wound doctor and returned back to the facility between 2:30 p.m. and 3:00 p.m. She said she was on the floor on Hall #1 helping CNA C with the residents for less than 1 hour and then had to leave at approximately 4:00 p.m. to transport Resident #6 to the ER. She said she returned to the facility at approximately 4:45 p.m. and started picking up trays and helped change residents in Hall #1 and #2. In an interview on 03/13/24 at 6:28 p.m., the Administrator said she was not aware Resident #1's call light was on for 30 minutes. She said when she checked on Resident #1, she asked her if she had her call light on for a while and she said yes. She said she told her she would get someone to assist her, turned off her call light, and immediately got the Activities Director to assist the resident and change her sheets. She said she told Nurse A that in times that they knew they were going to do wound care to give administration a forewarning so she could have a staff member in place. She said it was a one off. She said if they communicated, they would cover each other to help. She said a 30-minute situation where it was going to be both of them going in could eliminate the wait and could get someone else to assist. She said her expectation was that everyone could answer call lights, and if any department could handle what a resident needed then they should handle it and if they could not handle it, they need to keep the call light on and find someone that could. She said this could have potentially affected Resident #1's dignity, but this happened to be a one-off situation. In a follow-up interview on 03/13/24 at 6:50 p.m., the DON said she was not aware Resident #1's call light went unanswered for 30 minutes. She said this could potentially have led to a risk for skin breakdown. Record review of the facility's nursing schedule, dated 03/13/24, revealed Nurse A (Hall #2), Nurse B (Hall #1), CNA B (Hall #2), CNA C (Hall #1), CNA D/Transportation/Float, and MA A were scheduled for the 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. shift. Record review of the facility's staffing posting, dated 03/13/24, revealed a census of 41 and a staff total of 1 RN, 1 LVN, 1 CMA, and 3 CNAs during the day. Record review of the facility's policy titled Staffing, Sufficient and Competent Nursing, reviewed 03/2023, read in part .Our facility provides sufficient numbers of nursing staff with the appropriate skills and competency necessary to provide nursing and related care and services for all residents in accordance with resident care plans and the facility assessment .Staffing numbers and the skill requirements of direct care staff are determined by the needs of the residents based on each resident's plan of care, the resident assessments, and the facility assessment .
Mar 2024 2 deficiencies 2 IJ
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident has the right to be free from abu...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident has the right to be free from abuse for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed for abuse. -The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was free from abuse when CNA A allowed her significant other to verbally abuse Resident #1, allowed the significant other entry into the facility, and took him to Resident #1's room. The Significant other then threatened Resident #1 by pointing a gun at him. On 03/05/24 an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified. While the IJ template was removed on 03/07/24, the facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm and a scope of isolated due to the facility continuing to monitor the implementation and effectiveness of their Plan of Removal. This failure placed residents at risk of physical harm, mental anguish or emotional distress, pain and/or death. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's admission Record, dated 03/05/24, revealed a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's diagnoses included pressure ulcer of sacral region (the portion of your spine between your lower back and tailbone), paraplegia (condition that affects the lower half of the body, making it hard or impossible to walk, stand, or control the pelvic muscles), acute transverse myelitis demyelinating disease of central nervous system (neurological condition wherein the spinal cord is inflamed), and acquired absence (medical condition that indicates the loss or amputation) of right leg below knee. Record review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 02/05/24, revealed a BIMS score of 15, indicating intact cognitive skills. Further review revealed he required substantial/maximal assistance with toileting, bathing, and dressing. Record review of Resident #1's undated care plan revealed he required staff assistance for meeting emotional, intellectual, physical, and social needs related to physical limitations. The resident required extensive assistance with bed mobility and total assistance with transfers. Observation and interview on 03/04/24 at 12:15 p.m., revealed Resident #1 was lying in bed watching television. He said on 03/03/24 (he could not recall the time) Nurse B was in his room performing wound care on him while CNA A assisted. He said CNA A's phone kept going off and Nurse B told her not to answer. He said when they were done with his wound care, CNA A finally answered her phone, and it was her significant other. He said he could hear CNA A's significant other yelling at her and saying bitch, why didn't you answer this motherfucking phone. It does not take two hours to do wound care. He said he told Nurse B maybe CNA A's significant other needed to get his RN license or CNA so he could see that it took that long to do wound care. He said CNA A's significant other told her to tell him to shut the fuck up and CNA A told him. He said CNA A put her significant other on speaker phone and Resident #1 said he told him nah, you shut the fuck up. He said CNA A's significant other and him continued to curse at one another. He said CNA A left his room and came back approximately two minutes later and told him he needed to apologize to her significant other who was on speaker phone. He said her significant other also told him that he needed to apologize to him. He said he told them he was not going to apologize, and CNA A left his room again. He said it felt like CNA A was gone for approximately four to five minutes after she left his room the second time. He said Resident #2 was in his room when CNA A and her significant other entered his room. He said CNA A's significant other told her to get her bitch ass out and she left the room. He said he told Resident #2 to leave the room and he left. He said CNA A's significant other pulled out a gun and pointed it at him. He said soon after, Nurse B entered his room and pushed the significant other out. He said Nurse B told CNA A and her significant other that CNA A should have never let him in the building. He said he told police he did not want to press charges but did press charges against CNA A's significant other. He said he was not traumatized from having a gun pointed at him but was worried about the other residents. He said he was alright and felt safe at the facility. In an interview on 03/04/24 at 12:55 p.m., the Administrator said she had been working at the facility since August 2022. She said she received a call from the DON on Sunday, 03/03/24, between 2:30 p.m. and 2:50 p.m. She said she was told CNA A was doing wound care with Nurse B on Resident #1. She said she was told that while they were doing wound care, CNA A's significant other called her to go to lunch/go outside but she was saying to him she could not because she was in the middle of helping Nurse B. She said she guessed the significant other said some curse words to CNA A to relay to Resident #1 and from her understanding CNA A relayed what her significant other said to Resident #1. She said she was told Resident #1 said some curse words for CNA A to tell her significant other in return and then it sounded like it escalated to where her significant other wanted to come to the building so he could tell Resident #1 in person what he wanted to tell him. She said to her knowledge CNA A's significant other told her to go to the door and open it. She said CNA A opened the facility's door for her significant other and they went to Resident #1's room. She said she believed there was a yelling match and staff (unknown) called 911. She said the police came to the facility and escorted CNA A and her significant other off the property. She said she told the ADON to start in-servicing on violence in the workplace, abuse, neglect, and exploitation, to conduct safe surveys to check on the residents, gather witness statements, and told the DON to refer the resident to psych services to make sure he was okay and did not suffer any trauma. She said CNA A was suspended until further investigation was completed. She said the police were called and was told they would be patrolling the area a little more frequently for the next two weeks. She said all the keycode pads were recoded. She said they were planning on starting HIPPA staff in-service training violation because CNA A should not have been saying what care she was providing to Resident #1 and/or if the Resident #1's name was mentioned. She said staff were told that there were to be no more cell phones when providing care because it could have prevented the incident from occurring. She said the incident may have happened around 12:30ish p.m. In an interview on 03/04/24 at 1:47 p.m., the ADON said she had been working at the facility since 10/28/23. She said Nurse B called her on 03/03/24 and reported that CNA A and she were doing wound care on Resident #1. She said Nurse B told her CNA A was on the phone with her significant other who told CNA A that it was taking too long to do wound care. She said she was not sure if CNA A had her phone on speaker or at some point the significant other told CNA A to put the phone on speaker. She said Nurse B told her when CNA A had her phone on speaker, Resident #1 and the significant other started saying f-Us to each other and CNA A's significant other threatened to come to the facility with a handgun to handle Resident #1. She said she went to the facility and the cops were on the scene. She said she found out that CNA A entered the keycode in to the south hall's door, let her significant other inside the facility, and escorted him to Resident #1's room. She said she was present when Nurse B was talking to the cops and Nurse B told them the significant other had a handgun in his waistband. She said she walked away and went to speak with the resident. She said Resident #1 told her CNA A's significant other had a handgun, that it was visible, was in his hand, and went inside his room. She said she asked Resident #1 if the significant other pointed the handgun at him and he told her no. She said she asked him if he felt safe and he told her yes. She said Resident #1 told her he did not feel traumatized and did not need psych services. She said he told her the significant other said he would be back. In a telephone interview on 03/04/24 at 4:14 p.m., Nurse B said CNA A was helping her with Resident #1's wound care and had no clue that she was on the phone because she had her air pods/headphones in her ear. She said she was in the middle of taking off Resident #1's dressings and putting on new ones, and CNA was making and getting the bedding ready. She said CNA A said a few things (did not know what she said) and Resident #1 asked CNA A if she was talking to the air because they did not know she was on the phone. She said out of nowhere, CNA A blurted out it does take me two hours to do wound care. She said CNA A's significant other was upset because it was taking two hours. She said she asked CNA A what she was talking about, and CNA A told her she was talking to her significant other. She said she asked her what she meant, and she said CNA A told her that she answered her phone on her air pods/headphones. She said she asked CNA A to please not do that, especially at bedside. She said CNA A ignored her and continued talking on the phone. She said Resident #1 told CNA A to tell her significant other to go get his RN license and become a nurse and when he got his RN license and had to do wound care, he would see how extensive his wounds were and that it took two hours. She said after Resident #1 said that she carried on with what she was doing and thought CNA A got off the phone but then out of nowhere CNA A told Resident #1 that her significant other said, shut the fuck up. She said she was shocked that CNA A repeated those words, was still on her phone, and said that to the resident. She said she asked CNA A to exit the room, that it was very inappropriate, and why would she tell that to a resident. She said CNA A got an attitude and exited the room. She said CNA A went back to the hall and was walking around talking to her significant other. She said when she was done helping another resident, she went back down to Resident #1's room. She said Resident #1 told her CNA A had come in his room after she left, was on speaker phone with her significant other and cussed him out at bedside. She said that was when she found out CNA A was not down the hall. She said she was super busy because she was at the nurse's station charting, but from the corner of her eye she saw people walk past her but did not see who it was. She said she then heard really, really, really, loud screaming and was like what in the heck and triggered that oh my god it was probably CNA A's significant other going after Resident #1. She said she had a bad feeling about it because of the way they had talked and threatened each other over the phone. She said she jumped up, ran to the room, and heard the significant other tell Resident #1 I'm not a fucking boy, I'm a fucking man, and I am about to show you. She said when she got to the resident's room, CNA A's significant other looked at CNA A and told her to step out the room and shut the door behind her. She said she told CNA A's significant other, oh no, we are not doing this. She said he was at Resident #1's bedside hoovering over him. She said CNA A's significant other was wearing baggy pants and a real big baggy jacket, so she did not see the pistol at first. She said he had one arm around his waist, and had his other arm bunched up like he was nudging at Resident #1 trying to intimidate him while he was also screaming at him. She said she told CNA A's significant other we are not doing this; you need to get out of the room right now. She said Resident #1 told her that it was okay and to let him stay but she said no we are not doing this. She said she told Resident #1 they were not going to have him in there threatening him and that it was not happening. She said she was literally screaming at the top of her lungs. She said Resident #1 looked at her again and said that it was okay and to let him stay and she said she told the resident no. She said at that point she was confused and did not understand why the resident was telling her to let him stay. She said she had no clue what was going on and all she knew was CNA A let her significant other in the building and he was screaming at Resident #1 and had a pistol. She said at the time when she got in front of CNA A's significant other, she did not see the pistol. She said when he turned around, she was in between him and Resident #1, and told him to exit the room. She said he was trying to push up against her, nudging her, like a chest pump. She said she would not move so he did not get to Resident #1, but he was trying to stay there. She said she told him no, forced him backwards out of the room, and when he turned around to get in the hallway that was when she saw the pistol. She said when she noticed the pistol, she was like oh my god, just play it off, pretend you did not see it and she continued to escort CNA A and her significant other out of the building. She said she told them there was the exit and kept being forceful with them and said, exit the building, both of y'all. She said when she finally got CNA A and her significant other out the door area, she told both of them, do not come back on the premises, do not come back in this door. She said he did not care when he got out to the door. She said he was flaunting the pistol everywhere. She said he had it in his hand and was nonchalantly talking. She said she shut the door quickly and someone called 911. She said the cops went to the facility and after, she went back in the facility and talked to Resident #1. She said Resident #1 told her he told her to let CNA A's significant other to stay in his room because she did not see the pistol, and he did not want her to get hurt. She said Resident #1 told her it was going to be what it was. She said Resident #1 did not want her or Resident #2 to get hurt or shot if something went down. She said at the time it was not that scary, but when she thought back about it, it was pretty scary. She said she was just in full force mode trying to fix the situation and make it stop and did not think about how serious it was. In an interview on 03/04/24 at 5:33 p.m., CNA B said she had been working at the facility for 14 years and worked the 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. shift. She said she would tell the Administrator if there was someone in the building with a weapon but said she did not know what she would do if the administrator was not at the facility. She said she did not know what the facility's Emergency Procedure - Workplace Aggression/Violence procedure was. In an interview on 03/05/24 at 8:02 a.m., CNA C said she had been working at the facility for approximately 4 months. She said she received ANE, HIPPA, and cell phone use training yesterday, 03/04/24. She said the Administrator went over some other information during the in-service trainings, but she could not remember what it was about. She said she was not feeling well, and her brain was kind of foggy. In an interview on 03/05/24 at 10:08 a.m., CNA D said she had been working at the facility for approximately 2 ½ years. She said she did not receive Emergency Procedure - Aggression/Violence training. She said it was her signature on the in-service sign in sheet, but said she thought she was just signing off on getting the abuse policy. She said the sign-in sheet did not have the topics listed when she signed. In a follow-up interview on 03/05/24 at 10:32 a.m., CNA B said it was her signature on the in-service sign in sheet. She said they (could not recall who gave out the policies) gave out copy of the policies, reviewed the information, but said she just could not recall what was covered during the in-service trainings. In an interview on 03/05/24 at 12:35 p.m., Resident #2 said he was in Resident #1's room when a man came in and started arguing with Resident #1. He said he did not see a gun and did not know who the man was. He said Resident #1 told him to leave the room and he said he left right away. He said he did not remember what time it happened. In a telephone interview on 03/05/24 at 2:03 p.m., CNA A said she was in Resident #1's room doing care on him. She said her significant other called when she was doing wound care and she answered. She said when she answered the call, Resident #1 said something smart (could not recall what was said) to her significant other. She said Resident #1 then called her significant other a bitch, said he was a stay-at-home dad, and called him a MF word. She said Resident #1 was being vulgar and saying the B word and she told Resident #1 to respect her significant other and he said no. She said she told Resident #1 then to respect her by respecting her significant other. She said she was talking to her significant other on her headphones. She said her significant other did not say anything, but Resident #1 was still talking vulgarly. She said her significant other went to the facility to get her. She said she let her significant other in the building through the side door. She said she took her significant other to Resident #1's room, and he told Resident #1 to respect him as a man three times and then they left. She said her significant other did not have a gun. She said they were in Resident #1's room for about a minute. She said she was not on the phone when she was doing patient care but was on the phone while getting the bed linen up off the floor. In an interview on 03/07/24 at 8:22 a.m., the DON said the ADON notified her on 03/03/24 and she notified the Administrator. She said the ADON told her that CNA A may have to be sent home. She said the ADON told her that CNA A let her significant other in the building and in Resident #1's room. She said when the ADON made it to the building the police were already on the scene, and she said she told the ADON to go ahead and figure out what was going on and to call her back. She said she called the Administrator and told her what the ADON said happened. She said they got on the phone with regional support and the Regional Director of Operations, and the Administrator called in the report to the State. She said the ADON called her back, told her something about CNA A was on her phone, there was something about air pods, and that her significant other could hear conversations. She said she was told there was something about Resident #1 getting smart, phone being put on speaker, and an exchange of words between CNA A's significant other and Resident #1. She said she was told that CNA A's significant other went to the facility, and CNA A let him in Resident #1's room. She said the ADON said Nurse B and Resident #1 saw a pistol. Record review of the facility's policy titled Abuse Prohibition Policy, revised date 11/07/23, read in part .each resident has the right to be free from abuse .Policy: 1. The facility will prohibit neglect, mental or physical abuse .Definitions: Abuse means the willful infliction of injury .intimidation . Record review of the facility's policy titled Emergency Procedure - Workplace Aggression/Violence, dated 06/07/2023, read in part . The following procedure is utilized in the event of a Workplace Aggression/Violence incident in or near our facility. 1. If an incident or verbal aggression escalates or appears to be escalating to physical aggression, announce CODE GRAY: AGGRESSIVE (or any other code as adopted by the facility) with the location of the incident. 2. Call 911 if there is threat-based screaming, fighting, weapons involved, or any threat of danger. IF IN DOUBT, CALL 911. Provide the 911 dispatcher with as much relevant information as possible. 3. Instruct staff to move the residents and themselves immediately to safe, secure refuge and remain there until ALL CLEAR . This was determined to be an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) and the Administrator was notified on 03/05/24 at 5:03 p.m. The IJ template was presented to the facility and the POR was requested at this time. The following Plan of Removal submitted by the facility was accepted on 03/06/24 at 12:08 p.m. and included: Plan of Removal Immediate Jeopardy On 03/03/2024, an abbreviated survey was initiated at [the facility]. On 03/05/2024 the surveyor provided an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ)Template notification that the Regulatory Services has determined that the condition at the facility constitutes an immediate jeopardy to resident health and safety. The notification of Immediate Jeopardy states as follows: F689: Quality of Care, Accidents/Hazards the facility failed to provide a safe environment on 3/3/2024 when CNA allowed her significant other, who was armed with a pistol, to enter the facility through south hall's locked and coded door and access to Resident #1 Room. Administrator/Designee conducted life safety satisfaction assessment for all residents to ensure that no other resident affected completed by 3/5/2024. The facility also conducted In-Services on Workplace aggression/violence and ANE. Documents are in POR binder and uploaded to charts. The facility will follow policy and procedure regarding Workplace Aggression/Violence and ANE. Administrator/Designee will conduct in-services and they will be completed by 3/5/2024. Action on CNA A - suspended pending investigation on 3/3/2024. Psychosocial assessment completed on Resident #1 by social worker and resident no trauma/not affected by incident. Psychologists also saw Resident #1 and agreed to meet therapist on the next visit. Stated he was not affected by the incident. Nurse A was referred to our free services for Psych Services Action: Immediately, on March 5, 2024, Clinical Specialist in serviced DON and ADM to include Quality of care and treatment provided to facility residents. Training and competencies for DON, and ADM were completed on March 5, 2024: workplace violence, facility security, and ANE. On March 5, 2024, ADM/DON initiated in-services with all staff. In-services to include Workplace Aggression/violence and ANE, and life satisfaction surveys and any abnormalities will be given to family, physician, and ADM/DON. Completion date for staff in-services to be completed March 5, 2024. All Nursing staff will not be allowed to work until in servicing has been completed. Any contract staff or PRN staff will be in-service prior to working the floor. HIPAA and no use of cell phone while providing care in services was initiated on March 5, 2024, by ADM. Training will be documented and completed on March 5, 2024. Staff will not be allowed to work until in servicing has been completed. Any contract staff or PRN staff will be in-service prior to working the floor. The above training material (Workplace Aggression/violence and ANE) will be incorporated into the new hire orientation by ADM effective March 5, 2024, and ongoing. On March 5, 2024 an audit was conducted by ADM/Designee to identify other residents with potential trauma of from violence in the work place. Via direct observation, staff interviews, and record review, no other residents were identified as having an issue. In order to monitor current residents for potential risk, ADM/Designee will monitor residents with change in condition daily beginning March 5, 2024, for 30 days on all residents via Life Satisfaction/Trauma. The purpose of this log is to monitor residents with change in conditions. DON compliance will be monitored weekly by ADM/Designee for 90 days. Thereafter, QA will monitor quarterly up to a year for compliance of change of condition. If any issues are identified, the physician will be contacted (by ADM/Designee) immediately for further medical management and family/POA of the same. The facility QA Committee will meet weekly for the next eight weeks to review compliance with the plan of action. If no further concerns noted, will continue to monitor as per routine facility QA Committee. Start Date: 3/5/2024 Completion Date: 3/5/2024 Responsible: ADM and DON. Monitoring of the POR included: During interviews on 03/06/24 and 03/07/24, with staff from all shifts, revealed the following staff members were able to verbalize an understanding of the steps to take if an incident of workplace aggression/violence occurred: Administrator, DON, ADON, Rehab Director, Housekeeping/Laundry Manager, Nurses D, E and F, Medication Aide A, and CNAs A, B, E, and F. Record review of in-service sign in sheets for Workplace Aggression/Violence, ANE, HIPPA and cell phones revealed 44 staff signatures. Record review of Resident Life Satisfaction Round surveys, dated 03/05/24, revealed all 42 resident surveys were completed. Record review of CNA A's personnel file revealed the employee was suspended on 03/03/24 pending the facility's investigation. Record review of Resident #1's progress notes revealed the Social Worker completed a psychosocial assessment and resident reported no trauma from the incident. An Immediate Jeopardy was identified on 03/05/24 at 5:03 p.m. While the IJ was removed on 03/07/24, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and severity of no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems/plan of correction.
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the resident environment remains as free ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the resident environment remains as free of accident hazards for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed for quality of care. -The facility failed to provide a safe environment when CNA A allowed her significant other, who was armed with a pistol, entry into the facility's locked building, and access to Resident #1. -The facility failed to provide the Emergency Procedure - Workplace Aggression/Violence training. On 03/05/24 an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified. While the IJ template was removed on 03/07/24, the facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm and a scope of isolated due to the facility continuing to monitor the implementation and effectiveness of their Plan of Removal. This failure placed residents at risk of physical harm, mental anguish or emotional distress, pain and/or death. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's admission Record, dated 03/05/24, revealed a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's diagnoses included pressure ulcer of sacral region (the portion of your spine between your lower back and tailbone), paraplegia (condition that affects the lower half of the body, making it hard or impossible to walk, stand, or control the pelvic muscles), acute transverse myelitis demyelinating disease of central nervous system (neurological condition wherein the spinal cord is inflamed), and acquired absence (medical condition that indicates the loss or amputation) of right leg below knee. Record review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 02/05/24, revealed a BIMS score of 15, indicating intact cognitive skills. Further review revealed he required substantial/maximal assistance with toileting, bathing, and dressing. Record review of Resident #1's undated care plan revealed he required staff assistance for meeting emotional, intellectual, physical, and social needs related to physical limitations. The resident required extensive assistance with bed mobility and total assistance with transfers. Observation and interview on 03/04/24 at 12:15 p.m., revealed Resident #1 was lying in bed watching television. He said on 03/03/24 (he could not recall the time) Nurse B was in his room performing wound care on him while CNA A assisted. He said CNA A's phone kept going off and Nurse B told her not to answer. He said when they were done with his wound care, CNA A finally answered her phone, and it was her significant other. He said he could hear CNA A's significant other yelling at her and saying bitch, why didn't you answer this motherfucking phone. It does not take two hours to do wound care. He said he told Nurse B maybe CNA A's significant other needed to get his RN license or CNA so he could see that it took that long to do wound care. He said CNA A's significant other told her to tell him to shut the fuck up and CNA A told him. He said CNA A put her significant other on speaker phone and Resident #1 said he told him nah, you shut the fuck up. He said CNA A's significant other and him continued to curse at one another. He said CNA A left his room and came back approximately two minutes later and told him he needed to apologize to her significant other who was on speaker phone. He said her significant other also told him that he needed to apologize to him. He said he told them he was not going to apologize, and CNA A left his room again. He said it felt like CNA A was gone for approximately four to five minutes after she left his room the second time. He said Resident #2 was in his room when CNA A and her significant other entered his room. He said CNA A's significant other told her to get her bitch ass out and she left the room. He said he told Resident #2 to leave the room and he left. He said CNA A's significant other pulled out a gun and pointed it at him. He said soon after, Nurse B entered his room and pushed the significant other out. He said Nurse B told CNA A and her significant other that CNA A should have never let him in the building. He said he told police he did not want to press charges but did press charges against CNA A's significant other. He said he was not traumatized from having a gun pointed at him but was worried about the other residents. He said he was alright and felt safe at the facility. In an interview on 03/04/24 at 12:55 p.m., the Administrator said she had been working at the facility since August 2022. She said she received a call from the DON on Sunday, 03/03/24, between 2:30 p.m. and 2:50 p.m. She said she was told CNA A was doing wound care with Nurse B on Resident #1. She said she was told that while they were doing wound care, CNA A's significant other called her to go to lunch/go outside but she was saying to him she could not because she was in the middle of helping Nurse B. She said she guessed the significant other said some curse words to CNA A to relay to Resident #1 and from her understanding CNA A relayed what her significant other said to Resident #1. She said she was told Resident #1 said some curse words for CNA A to tell her significant other in return and then it sounded like it escalated to where her significant other wanted to come to the building so he could tell Resident #1 in person what he wanted to tell him. She said to her knowledge CNA A's significant other told her to go to the door and open it. She said CNA A opened the facility's door for her significant other and they went to Resident #1's room. She said she believed there was a yelling match and staff (unknown) called 911. She said the police came to the facility and escorted CNA A and her significant other off the property. She said she told the ADON to start in-servicing on violence in the workplace, abuse, neglect, and exploitation, to conduct safe surveys to check on the residents, gather witness statements, and told the DON to refer the resident to psych services to make sure he was okay and did not suffer any trauma. She said CNA A was suspended until further investigation was completed. She said the police were called and was told they would be patrolling the area a little more frequently for the next two weeks. She said all the keycode pads were recoded. She said they were planning on starting HIPPA staff in-service training violation because CNA A should not have been saying what care she was providing to Resident #1 and/or if the Resident #1's name was mentioned. She said staff were told that there were to be no more cell phones when providing care because it could have prevented the incident from occurring. She said the incident may have happened around 12:30ish p.m. In an interview on 03/04/24 at 1:47 p.m., the ADON said she had been working at the facility since 10/28/23. She said Nurse B called her on 03/03/24 and reported that CNA A and she were doing wound care on Resident #1. She said Nurse B told her CNA A was on the phone with her significant other who told CNA A that it was taking too long to do wound care. She said she was not sure if CNA A had her phone on speaker or at some point the significant other told CNA A to put the phone on speaker. She said Nurse B told her when CNA A had her phone on speaker, Resident #1 and the significant other started saying f-Us to each other and CNA A's significant other threatened to come to the facility with a handgun to handle Resident #1. She said she went to the facility and the cops were on the scene. She said she found out that CNA A entered the keycode in to the south hall's door, let her significant other inside the facility, and escorted him to Resident #1's room. She said she was present when Nurse B was talking to the cops and Nurse B told them the significant other had a handgun in his waistband. She said she walked away and went to speak with the resident. She said Resident #1 told her CNA A's significant other had a handgun, that it was visible, was in his hand, and went inside his room. She said she asked Resident #1 if the significant other pointed the handgun at him and he told her no. She said she asked him if he felt safe and he told her yes. She said Resident #1 told her he did not feel traumatized and did not need psych services. She said he told her the significant other said he would be back. In a telephone interview on 03/04/24 at 4:14 p.m., Nurse B said CNA A was helping her with Resident #1's wound care and had no clue that she was on the phone because she had her air pods/headphones in her ear. She said she was in the middle of taking off Resident #1's dressings and putting on new ones, and CNA was making and getting the bedding ready. She said CNA A said a few things (did not know what she said) and Resident #1 asked CNA A if she was talking to the air because they did not know she was on the phone. She said out of nowhere, CNA A blurted out it does take me two hours to do wound care. She said CNA A's significant other was upset because it was taking two hours. She said she asked CNA A what she was talking about, and CNA A told her she was talking to her significant other. She said she asked her what she meant, and she said CNA A told her that she answered her phone on her air pods/headphones. She said she asked CNA A to please not do that, especially at bedside. She said CNA A ignored her and continued talking on the phone. She said Resident #1 told CNA A to tell her significant other to go get his RN license and become a nurse and when he got his RN license and had to do wound care, he would see how extensive his wounds were and that it took two hours. She said after Resident #1 said that she carried on with what she was doing and thought CNA A got off the phone but then out of nowhere CNA A told Resident #1 that her significant other said, shut the fuck up. She said she was shocked that CNA A repeated those words, was still on her phone, and said that to the resident. She said she asked CNA A to exit the room, that it was very inappropriate, and why would she tell that to a resident. She said CNA A got an attitude and exited the room. She said CNA A went back to the hall and was walking around talking to her significant other. She said when she was done helping another resident, she went back down to Resident #1's room. She said Resident #1 told her CNA A had come in his room after she left, was on speaker phone with her significant other and cussed him out at bedside. She said that was when she found out CNA A was not down the hall. She said she was super busy because she was at the nurse's station charting, but from the corner of her eye she saw people walk past her but did not see who it was. She said she then heard really, really, really, loud screaming and was like what in the heck and triggered that oh my god it was probably CNA A's significant other going after Resident #1. She said she had a bad feeling about it because of the way they had talked and threatened each other over the phone. She said she jumped up, ran to the room, and heard the significant other tell Resident #1 I'm not a fucking boy, I'm a fucking man, and I am about to show you. She said when she got to the resident's room, CNA A's significant other looked at CNA A and told her to step out the room and shut the door behind her. She said she told CNA A's significant other, oh no, we are not doing this. She said he was at Resident #1's bedside hoovering over him. She said CNA A's significant other was wearing baggy pants and a real big baggy jacket, so she did not see the pistol at first. She said he had one arm around his waist, and had his other arm bunched up like he was nudging at Resident #1 trying to intimidate him while he was also screaming at him. She said she told CNA A's significant other we are not doing this; you need to get out of the room right now. She said Resident #1 told her that it was okay and to let him stay but she said no we are not doing this. She said she told Resident #1 they were not going to have him in there threatening him and that it was not happening. She said she was literally screaming at the top of her lungs. She said Resident #1 looked at her again and said that it was okay and to let him stay and she said she told the resident no. She said at that point she was confused and did not understand why the resident was telling her to let him stay. She said she had no clue what was going on and all she knew was CNA A let her significant other in the building and he was screaming at Resident #1 and had a pistol. She said at the time when she got in front of CNA A's significant other, she did not see the pistol. She said when he turned around, she was in between him and Resident #1, and told him to exit the room. She said he was trying to push up against her, nudging her, like a chest pump. She said she would not move so he did not get to Resident #1, but he was trying to stay there. She said she told him no, forced him backwards out of the room, and when he turned around to get in the hallway that was when she saw the pistol. She said when she noticed the pistol, she was like oh my god, just play it off, pretend you did not see it and she continued to escort CNA A and her significant other out of the building. She said she told them there was the exit and kept being forceful with them and said, exit the building, both of y'all. She said when she finally got CNA A and her significant other out the door area, she told both of them, do not come back on the premises, do not come back in this door. She said he did not care when he got out to the door. She said he was flaunting the pistol everywhere. She said he had it in his hand and was nonchalantly talking. She said she shut the door quickly and someone called 911. She said the cops went to the facility and after, she went back in the facility and talked to Resident #1. She said Resident #1 told her he told her to let CNA A's significant other to stay in his room because she did not see the pistol, and he did not want her to get hurt. She said Resident #1 told her it was going to be what it was. She said Resident #1 did not want her or Resident #2 to get hurt or shot if something went down. She said at the time it was not that scary, but when she thought back about it, it was pretty scary. She said she was just in full force mode trying to fix the situation and make it stop and did not think about how serious it was. In an interview on 03/04/24 at 5:33 p.m., CNA B said she had been working at the facility for 14 years and worked the 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. shift. She said she would tell the Administrator if there was someone in the building with a weapon but said she did not know what she would do if the administrator was not at the facility. She said she did not know what the facility's Emergency Procedure - Workplace Aggression/Violence procedure was. In an interview on 03/05/24 at 8:02 a.m., CNA C said she had been working at the facility for approximately 4 months. She said she received ANE, HIPPA, and cell phone use training yesterday, 03/04/24. She said the Administrator went over some other information during the in-service trainings, but she could not remember what it was about. She said she was not feeling well, and her brain was kind of foggy. In an interview on 03/05/24 at 10:08 a.m., CNA D said she had been working at the facility for approximately 2 ½ years. She said she did not receive Emergency Procedure - Aggression/Violence training. She said it was her signature on the in-service sign in sheet, but said she thought she was just signing off on getting the abuse policy. She said the sign-in sheet did not have the topics listed when she signed. In a follow-up interview on 03/05/24 at 10:32 a.m., CNA B said it was her signature on the in-service sign in sheet. She said they (could not recall who gave out the policies) gave out copy of the policies, reviewed the information, but said she just could not recall what was covered during the in-service trainings. In an interview on 03/05/24 at 12:35 p.m., Resident #2 said he was in Resident #1's room when a man came in and started arguing with Resident #1. He said he did not see a gun and did not know who the man was. He said Resident #1 told him to leave the room and he said he left right away. He said he did not remember what time it happened. In a telephone interview on 03/05/24 at 2:03 p.m., CNA A said she was in Resident #1's room doing care on him. She said her significant other called when she was doing wound care and she answered. She said when she answered the call, Resident #1 said something smart (could not recall what was said) to her significant other. She said Resident #1 then called her significant other a bitch, said he was a stay-at-home dad, and called him a MF word. She said Resident #1 was being vulgar and saying the B word and she told Resident #1 to respect her significant other and he said no. She said she told Resident #1 then to respect her by respecting her significant other. She said she was talking to her significant other on her headphones. She said her significant other did not say anything, but Resident #1 was still talking vulgarly. She said her significant other went to the facility to get her. She said she let her significant other in the building through the side door. She said she took her significant other to Resident #1's room, and he told Resident #1 to respect him as a man three times and then they left. She said her significant other did not have a gun. She said they were in Resident #1's room for about a minute. She said she was not on the phone when she was doing patient care but was on the phone while getting the bed linen up off the floor. In an interview on 03/07/24 at 8:22 a.m., the DON said the ADON notified her on 03/03/24 and she notified the Administrator. She said the ADON told her that CNA A may have to be sent home. She said the ADON told her that CNA A let her significant other in the building and in Resident #1's room. She said when the ADON made it to the building the police were already on the scene, and she said she told the ADON to go ahead and figure out what was going on and to call her back. She said she called the Administrator and told her what the ADON said happened. She said they got on the phone with regional support and the Regional Director of Operations, and the Administrator called in the report to the State. She said the ADON called her back, told her something about CNA A was on her phone, there was something about air pods, and that her significant other could hear conversations. She said she was told there was something about Resident #1 getting smart, phone being put on speaker, and an exchange of words between CNA A's significant other and Resident #1. She said she was told that CNA A's significant other went to the facility, and CNA A let him in Resident #1's room. She said the ADON said Nurse B and Resident #1 saw a pistol. Record review of the facility's policy titled 'Emergency Procedure - Workplace Aggression/Violence, dated 06/07/2023, read in part . The following procedure is utilized in the event of a Workplace Aggression/Violence incident in or near our facility. 1. If an incident or verbal aggression escalates or appears to be escalating to physical aggression, announce CODE GRAY: AGGRESSIVE (or any other code as adopted by the facility) with the location of the incident. 2. Call 911 if there is threat-based screaming, fighting, weapons involved, or any threat of danger. IF IN DOUBT, CALL 911. Provide the 911 dispatcher with as much relevant information as possible. 3. Instruct staff to move the residents and themselves immediately to safe, secure refuge and remain there until ALL CLEAR . This was determined to be an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) and the Administrator was notified on 03/05/24 at 5:03 p.m. The IJ template was presented to the facility and the POR was requested at this time . The following Plan of Removal submitted by the facility was accepted on 03/06/24 at 12:08 p.m. and included: Plan of Removal Immediate Jeopardy On 03/03/2024, an abbreviated survey was initiated at [the facility]. On 03/05/2024 the surveyor provided an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ)Template notification that the Regulatory Services has determined that the condition at the facility constitutes an immediate jeopardy to resident health and safety. The notification of Immediate Jeopardy states as follows: F689: Quality of Care, Accidents/Hazards the facility failed to provide a safe environment on 3/3/2024 when CNA allowed her significant other, who was armed with a pistol, to enter the facility through south hall's locked and coded door and access to Resident #1 Room. Administrator/Designee conducted life safety satisfaction assessment for all residents to ensure that no other resident affected completed by 3/5/2024. The facility also conducted In-Services on Workplace aggression/violence and ANE. Documents are in POR binder and uploaded to charts. The facility will follow policy and procedure regarding Workplace Aggression/Violence and ANE. Administrator/Designee will conduct in-services and they will be completed by 3/5/2024. Action on CNA A - suspended pending investigation on 3/3/2024. Psychosocial assessment completed on Resident #1 by social worker and resident no trauma/not affected by incident. Psychologists also saw Resident #1 and agreed to meet therapist on the next visit. Stated he was not affected by the incident. Nurse A was referred to our free services for Psych Services Action: Immediately, on March 5, 2024, Clinical Specialist in serviced DON and ADM to include Quality of care and treatment provided to facility residents. Training and competencies for DON, and ADM were completed on March 5, 2024: workplace violence, facility security, and ANE. On March 5, 2024, ADM/DON initiated in-services with all staff. In-services to include Workplace Aggression/violence and ANE, and life satisfaction surveys and any abnormalities will be given to family, physician, and ADM/DON. Completion date for staff in-services to be completed March 5, 2024. All Nursing staff will not be allowed to work until in servicing has been completed. Any contract staff or PRN staff will be in-service prior to working the floor. HIPAA and no use of cell phone while providing care in services was initiated on March 5, 2024, by ADM. Training will be documented and completed on March 5, 2024. Staff will not be allowed to work until in servicing has been completed. Any contract staff or PRN staff will be in-service prior to working the floor. The above training material (Workplace Aggression/violence and ANE) will be incorporated into the new hire orientation by ADM effective March 5, 2024, and ongoing. On March 5, 2024 an audit was conducted by ADM/Designee to identify other residents with potential trauma of from violence in the work place. Via direct observation, staff interviews, and record review, no other residents were identified as having an issue. In order to monitor current residents for potential risk, ADM/Designee will monitor residents with change in condition daily beginning March 5, 2024, for 30 days on all residents via Life Satisfaction/Trauma. The purpose of this log is to monitor residents with change in conditions. DON compliance will be monitored weekly by ADM/Designee for 90 days. Thereafter, QA will monitor quarterly up to a year for compliance of change of condition. If any issues are identified, the physician will be contacted (by ADM/Designee) immediately for further medical management and family/POA of the same. The facility QA Committee will meet weekly for the next eight weeks to review compliance with the plan of action. If no further concerns noted, will continue to monitor as per routine facility QA Committee. Start Date: 3/5/2024 Completion Date: 3/5/2024 Responsible: ADM and DON. Monitoring of the POR included: During interviews on 03/06/24 and 03/07/24, with staff from all shifts, revealed the following staff members were able to verbalize an understanding of the steps to take if an incident of workplace aggression/violence occurred: Administrator, DON, ADON, Rehab Director, Housekeeping/Laundry Manager, Nurses D, E and F, Medication Aide A, and CNAs A, B, E, and F. Record review of in-service sign in sheets for Workplace Aggression/Violence, ANE, HIPPA and cell phones revealed 44 staff signatures. Record review of Resident Life Satisfaction Round surveys, dated 03/05/24, revealed all 42 resident surveys were completed. Record review of CNA A's personnel file revealed the employee was suspended on 03/03/24 pending the facility's investigation. Record review of Resident #1's progress notes, revealed the Social Worker completed a psychosocial assessment and resident reported no trauma from the incident. An Immediate Jeopardy was identified on 03/05/24 at 5:03 p.m. While the IJ was removed on 03/07/24, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and severity of no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems/plan of correction.
Dec 2023 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program d...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 3 (Residents #1, #2, and #3) out of 6 residents reviewed for infection control, in that: The Facility failed to sanitize blood pressure equipment used for multiple residents. This failure could place residents living in the facility at risk of exposure to infections. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet revealed resident was a [AGE] years old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of hypertension (abnormal high blood pressure), hypercholesterolemia (high levels of cholesterol in the blood), major depressive disorder, insomnia (a sleep disorder where there is trouble falling and/or staying asleep), constipation, type 2 diabetes mellitus (disease that occurs when your blood glucose, also called blood sugar, is too high), and dementia (condition characterized by progressive or persistent loss of intellectual functioning). Review of the MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 11/24/2023 revealed Rresident #1 had diagnoses of heart failure, and hypertension. On 12/28/2023 at 7:41am observation revealed Medication Aide A checked Resident #1's blood pressure with blood pressure machine , after which she administered blood pressure medication (Amlodipine Besylate oral tablet 10 mg by mouth one time a day related to hypertension) to Resident #1. Record review of Resident #2's face sheet revealed a [AGE] years old female initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her current admission to the facility was on 10/26/2023. Her diagnoses included anxiety disorder, hypertension (abnormal high blood pressure), hypothyroidism (a disease of thyroid gland not making enough thyroid hormones to meet body's needs), mood disorder, morbid obesity (a condition of extreme overweight with complex disease), chronic embolism and thrombosis, pain, chronic kidney disease, muscle weakness, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a group of diseases that cause airflow blockage and breathing-related problems), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and heart failure. Record review of the MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #2 had diagnoses of anxiety disorder, hypertension, hypothyroidism, mood disorder, morbid obesity, chronic embolism and thrombosis, pain, chronic kidney disease, muscle weakness, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dysphagia, and heart failure. On 12/28/2023 at 8:03am observation revealed Medication Aide A used the same blood pressure machine she used for Resident #1 to check Resident #2's blood pressure without sanitizing it. Record review of Resident #3's face sheet revealed she was a [AGE] years old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of hypertension (abnormal high blood pressure), anemia (low level of blood in the body), bipolar disorder (a mental illness that causes unusual shifts in a person's mood, energy, activity levels, and concentration), hypothyroidism (a disease of thyroid gland not making enough thyroid hormones to meet body's needs), epilepsy, Gastro-esophageal reflux disease (disease that occurred when stomach acid repeatedly flows back into the tube connecting mouth and stomach), insomnia (a sleep disorder where there is trouble falling and/or staying asleep), and respiratory failure. Review of the MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #3 had diagnoses of hypertension, anemia, bipolar disorder, hypothyroidism, epilepsy Gastro-esophageal reflux disease, insomnia, and acute respiratory failure. On 12/28/2023 at 08:18am observation revealed Medication Aide A checked Resident #3's blood pressure using the same blood pressure machine she used for Resident #1 and Resident #2 and failed to sanitize the blood pressure machine before using it for them. On 12/28/2023 at 8:46am in an interview with Medication Aide A, she stated she was sorry, she said she used to sanitize the blood pressure machine, but she forgot because she did not place the sanitizing wipe on her cart. She stated she had been trained regarding infection control and disinfecting equipment used for multiple residents. She stated this deficient practice could cause an infection to be transferred from one resident to the other and increase risk of infection for the residents. On 12/28/2023 at 10:58am in an interview with the DON (Director of Nursing) she stated the deficient practice was exposing residents to higher risk for cross contamination and infection. Sshe stated every equipment used for multiple residents had to be disinfected between residents. She stated the facility had trained the staffs including the Medication Aide regarding infection control and sanitizing equipment . Record review of the facility policy dated 3/2023 revealed, in part, Resident-care equipment, including reusable items and durable medical equipment will be cleaned and disinfected according to current CDC recommendations for disinfection .
Sept 2022 18 deficiencies 2 IJ (2 affecting multiple)
CRITICAL (K)

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, observations, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse and neglect f...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, observations, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse and neglect for 4 (Resident #7, #8, #23, and #38,) of 21 residents on the North Hall and 2 (Resident #30 and #35) of 17 residents on the South Hall. The Administrator and DON failed to provide necessary protection from staff member (TA K) who verbally and mentally Intimidated residents by yelling at them in angry tones, slammed resident doors to create fear, threatened residents with physical abuse, used retaliatory behavior in not providing timely care and invaded resident privacy by entering residents rooms without knocking or asking permission when female residents were undressing affecting residents' psycho social well-being causing fear and psycho social harm. On 09/23/22 at 5:10 pm an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified. While the IJ was removed on 09/25/22 at 12:30 pm, the facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy with a scope of pattern due to the facility continuing to monitor the implementation and effectiveness of their plan of removal. The facility Administrator received the IJ template on 09/25/22 at 12:30 PM. These failures could place the residents at an unsafe environment exposing them to verbal, mental and physical abuse, neglect and mental anguish. Findings Included: Resident #38 Record review of Resident #38's undated face sheet revealed she was a [AGE] year-old-female admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of necrotizing fasciitis (flesh eating bacteria), cellulitis of the lower limb, hypokalemia, abscess of the mouth, nausea vomiting, chronic diarrhea and pain in right toe. Record review of Resident #38's MDS re-admission dated 05/26/2022 revealed she had a BIMS (brief interview for memory status) of 15 indicating she was cognitively intact and able to make her needs known. Section G (functional status) revealed she required supervision for personal hygiene. Record review of Resident #38's Care Plan dated 05/22/2022 revealed she was at risk for falls, weight loss due to chronic diarrhea, and use of anti-depressant medication. Record review of Resident #38's physician orders dated 05/28/2022 initial orders revealed the following medications: Cymbalta 60 milligram (anti-depressant) 1 tablet a daily for depression. During initial tour of the facility on 09/20/22 at 9:35 AM, interview with Resident #38 asked the surveyor what she should do if a staff member threatened her for being a tattle tale. She said she would explain in further detail, but she was on her way to an outing with the activity director and fellow residents and would explain later. During an interview on 09/21/2022 at 8:00 AM, Resident #38 said TA K worked last night and told her that the state was in the building and that if she told on him (regarding the verbal abuse) it was going to be bad for her (threaten retribution) . She said it was an ongoing issue because of the problems he initially had with the smokers and the complaints against him regarding not giving showers and the allegation of being sexually inappropriate with Resident #35. She said she was afraid of him because of his behaviors, he yells at residents and slams doors and enter rooms without knocking. She said he worked last night (09/20/2022 6:00 PM to 09/21/2022 to 6:00 AM) and told her these things. She said she was told to sign the questionnaire when the thing with Resident #35 came up (sexual abuse allegation) but did not feel comfortable with it. During an interview 09/21/2022 at 8:10 AM with Resident #38's roommate ( Resident #9) who participates in the smoking area was alert and oriented times three (aware of person place and time). said she witnessed TA K making threatening remarks when he came into their room during his shift ( 09/20/2022 6:00 PM to 09/21/2022 to 6:00 AM)(but in the morning-unsure of the exact time) and accused Resident #9 of telling on him (regarding to the showers, and verbal abuse) and when Resident #9 said she did not tell on him, he then accused Resident #38 and said he would get her. Resident #38 understood TA K threatened to physically assault her. During an interview on 09/22/2022 at 2:00 PM with Resident #38, while she was on the telephone with her mother, her mother told the surveyor she was aware of the threats Resident #38 was receiving from TA K and hoped the surveyor will help resolve the threats she was receiving him (from TA K). Resident #35 Record review of Resident #35's undated face sheet revealed she was a [AGE] year-old-female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of: hypertension, heart failure, thrombosis of other thoracic veins (blood clot in thoracic vein), Weakness, Other muscle spasm, and need for assistance with personal care. Review of Resident #35's annual MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #35 had a BIMS of 15 indicating she was cognitively intact and able to make her needs known. Section G (Functional Status) revealed she required extensive assistance with dressing, bathing, toilet use and hygiene with one person assistance. Review of Resident #35's Care Plan dated 08/21/2022 revealed resident had communication difficulty, at risk for pressure ulcers, utilize wheelchair for mobility, risk for falls and morbidly obese. Review of the facility's Incident Report dated 08/31/2022 revealed the following: Sexual assault allegation reported by resident (Resident #35) Resident stated male CNA (TA K) hugged her and made a humping movement rubbed his penis against her arms. Resident said she told male CNA (TA K) to stop. Male CNA (TA K) suspended until further notice pending investigation of allegation of sexual assault allegations . Authorities notified . Review of Police Report (undated report case #22-02928) revealed Insufficient evidence to substantiate the assault and the State Agency investigator did not find sufficient evidence to substantiate the allegation. Resident #35 disputed their findings and feared TA K. During Resident Council meeting on 09/21/2022 at 10:15 AM, 14 residents attended, Resident #35 was the president of the council (preceding over the meeting). Residents 6 of (14) expressed grievances regarding TA K because he said he would only give out two cigarettes due to the residents complaining about him about showers. The said he told the residents on the smoke break he can do whatever he wanted to and when he gives out the cigarettes for the breaks even though three cigarettes were giving on other breaks. Several (4 on the north hall) residents said TA K would go up and down the hall and slam doors, yell at residents and just walk into rooms without knocking and especially when the ladies were dressing. Surveyor asked residents attending the Resident Council Meeting how many people were afraid of TA, 9 residents held up their hands including Resident #7, #,8, #23, #35 and #38 (4 others did not wish to be identified). Resident #8 Review of Resident #8's undated face sheet revealed she was a [AGE] year-old-female re-admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of: bipolar disorder, gout (excessive uric acid collected in joints), pain in ankle and foot, insomnia (difficulty sleeping). Review of Resident #8's last assessed MDS dated [DATE] revealed she had a BIMS score of 12 indicating she was moderately cognitively impaired but able to make her needs known. Section G (Function Status) revealed she needed set up and supervision with personal hygiene. Review of Resident #8's Care Plan dated 10/11/2018 revealed to participate in activities, risk for falls due to safety awareness, and chronic illness due to lupus (autoimmune syndrome). During interview on 09/22/2022 at 10:50 AM Resident #8 said, TA K would yell at the residents and would bump into them inappropriately hugging them. She said she was afraid of TA K; he had a habit of coming into women's room not knocking when he knew they were dressing. She said she was afraid of him because he was always threatening the residents in one way or another (unspecific regarding threats). She said she was told to sign the questionnaire (about Resident #35's sexual assault allegation and if they felt safe) and was uncomfortable about being identified. During an interview on 09/22/2022 at 2:20 PM with Resident #8's family member, (son) said she mentioned the inappropriate behavior TA K displayed (inappropriate hugging, yelling at residents, slamming doors making threatening comments) and he was in the process of getting her moved out. Resident #23 Review of Resident #23's undated face sheet revealed she was a [AGE] year-old-female re-admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of: Displaced fracture of base of neck of left femur, Overactive bladder, Pneumonia, abnormalities of gait and mobility. Review of Resident #23's Initial MDS dated [DATE] revealed she had a BIMS score of 14 indicating she was cognitively intact and able to make her needs known. Section G (Function Status) revealed she required extensive assistance with personal hygiene. Review of Resident #23's Care Plan dated 08/10/2022 revealed she was at risk for pressure ulcers and at risk for anemia. During an interview with Resident #23 on 09/22/2022 at 11:05 AM, she said TA K came one night to change her and told her we need to make love. She said she told him that was a very inappropriate statement. She said, he said she misunderstood him and changed her brief. She said he made her very uncomfortable, and she was lucky she only needed to be changed one time. She said her family member, Resident #32 (lives in same room) said he did not hear the conversation, but TA K goes down the hall and yells and was very loud. Resident #30 Review of Resident #30's undated face sheet revealed he was a [AGE] year-old-male admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of: Malignant neoplasm of bronchus or lung (Admission), anxiety disorder, Pain, and displaced fracture of surgical neck of left humerus. Review of Resident #30's MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS of 3 indicating he was severely cognitively impaired. Section G (Function Status) revealed he required extensive assistance for personal hygiene. During one-on-one interview with Resident #30 on 09/23/2022 3:00 PM, he stated he was familiar with TA K, and he worked the night shift. He stated he was uncomfortable around him and felt intimidated. He stated he would rather stay wet than ask him for help because he could tell it (changing his briefs from an incontinent episode) made TA K mad. He stated no one else made him feel that way. He stated TA K acted mad and smarted off to us when he took the smokers out to smoke. He stated he could not remember what he said but he knew TA K made him feel bad He could not remember a specific date or time. Resident #7 Review of Resident #7's undated face sheet revealed he was a [AGE] year-old-male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of: Chronic pain due to trauma, Anorexia nervosa, binge eating/purging type, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, Tachycardia, Gastro-esophageal reflux disease with esophagitis, Heart failure, disorder of thyroid, Vascular dementia with behavior disturbances. Review of Resident #7's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed he had a BIMS score of 15 indicating he was cognitively intact and able to make his needs known. Section G (Functional Section) revealed he required extensive assistance for personal hygiene. During an interview with Resident #7 on 09/22/2022 at 2:45 PM, he said he was always arguing with TA K because he always made a fuss about changing him. He said he called him a bitch and not being a man because Resident #7 needed someone to change him. (Resident #7 said no use to complaining because no one does anything about it. He said they (residents) complain about TA K, but nothing is done (Resident Council grievances) During an interview with the Administrator and DON on 09/22/2022 at 11:40 AM, they said they must find out what was going on. The Administrator said she found out TA K left one night and went home around 11:00 PM (disciplinary documentation stated date of incident 08/31/2022) and was missing for 5 hours. The Administrator said human resources (corporate) told Administrator and DON they had the options of terminating him or counsel him and allow him to return to work. She said we were given that options. The DON said the Aide who worked with him said he left for 5 hours and fell asleep at home. The Administrator said HR (human resources) told them it was clear cut reason to terminate him, but we were given the option of counseling him. The Administrator and DON stated they chose to allow him to return to work. Interview with the Activity Director on 09/22/2022 at 12:15 PM, said she was aware of the problems the residents who participates in the smoke breaks during the smoke breaks (#7, #8, #9 #35, and #38 and four more not willing to be identified) was having with TA (transition assistant) and has given the Resident Council minutes to the ADON (resident council minutes and grievances were reviewed by surveyor prior to the Resident Council meeting on 09/21/2022 at 10:15 AM) and they discuss the problem in the stand-up meetings (morning meeting of facility department heads). She said they counseled him and let him come back. She said she has no influence on who to hire or fire. She said, all I can do is make the Administrator know. During an interview with Resident #38 on 09/22/2022 at 12:35 PM, said the call lights will turn on and a light will come on outside the room, but the alarm will not come on. Resident #38 resides on the hall where TA K works. Resident #38 said because the call lights would not sound, he TA K could be verbally and mentally abusive. Resident #38 said because of the sexual abuse allegation TA K had to work on the North Hall the call lights would not sound he TA K could be threatening, yell at the resident slam doors and threaten them. Observation of Resident #38's Call light being turned on 09/22/2022 at 12:35 PM revealed the light outside of her room coming on but not audible sound coming on. Observation on 09/23/2022 at 9:30 AM alarm system was checked on the North Hall, in the center of the hall a switch could be turn off and on. When the switch was in the Off position, the audio alarm did not activate when the resident activated the call light system in their room. When the switch was in the on position, the audio alarm sounded when the call light was activated by the resident. Resident #38 said because the call lights would not sound, he TA K could be verbally and mentally abusive. During an interview with ADON on 09/22/2022 at 4:35 PM, she said she has never been given any of the grievances or Resident Council minutes by the Activities Director and has not been aware of residents being threatened. During an interview with the Administrator on 09/23/2022 at 10:40 AM, surveyor asked if she was aware of the complaints from the residents, that they were being threatened by TA K. She said this was the first time she heard about the complaints and never received any of the Resident Council Minutes or grievances. Administrator was told by the survey team. During interview with CNA I on 09/23/2022 at 3:00 PM, she said she was working the South Hall and noticed the call light panel going off for residents on the North Hall. She said TA K was only allowed to work the North Hall because of the allegations of sexual abuse alleged by Resident #35. She said she went to the North Hall and noticed several call lights on and took care of the residents. She said she then texted TA K and asked where he was, she said he wrote back and said he went home and fell asleep. She said he said he will be back. She said he did not come back untill 5 AM in the morning. She said he threatened her if she told anyone. CNA I was unspecific about the threat but noticed someone was trying to vandalize her car the next night She called the Administrator who said not to take any more calls from him. Record review revealed inappropriate behavior dated 09/21/2022 at 6:00 AM ADON confronted TA K regarding his charting .he did not give a fuck about charting the point of care in the computer, and they would not be done. She said she asked him to discuss the matter with her and he said, he did not have to talk to her . The Administrator told ADON to write down this encounter for disciplinary action. Attempts to interview TA K was made on 09/23/2022 at 2:00 PM, Regional Operations Manager also attempted to call TA K at an undisclosed time on 09/23/2022 for an interview he said TA K hung up the telephone and would not speak to the Regional Operations Manager as told to surveyors. Attempts to interview Charge nurse on 09/23/2022 regarding TA K leaving the facility for 5 hours was made without success in returning telephone calls. During an interview with the Administrator 09/25/2022 at 2:30 PM, she said Resident #35 came to her and said TA K was telling us on smoke break we were all a bunch of liars, and he would preach about he was tight with God, and we were going to hell and Resident #35 was making up the sexual assault allegation. She said regarding the interview of CNA L, Administrator said because of the sexual abuse allegation there were not to be any discussions about what happened that was why she told her not to take any more calls from TA K. When asked by the surveyors what the Administrator thought about TA K calling the residents liars and preaching, she said she told TA K not to preach to the residents anymore. Administrator added TA K has been terminated. Review of Email provided by Administrator to Human Resources dated 09/23/2022 at 8:10 AM confirmed termination of TA K. Review of the Grievances dated 08/28/2022 On 6:30 PM recorded by the Resident Council secretary revealed: during smoke break TA K informed everyone that we were only getting two cigarettes instead of three that we usually get for the last smoke break of the day. When asked why he said we complained about the showers not being given then we were to have our break cut short. Then asked if it was the nurses or the management, he said it was his decision and if we did not like it that we could go in and not go bother to come out for the next smoke break that he would be taking us out on. He told a group since he got in trouble that we were only getting two cigarettes instead of the three. He continues to push the issue about showers so that Resident #7 was the blame for only getting two cigarettes since he complained about the showers . TA K said he was taking us out of the kindness of his heart. TA K continued to argue with Resident #35 and said he was in charge and that what he says is final and if we don't like it, there is the door. It was brought to my attention as Resident Council Secretary by Resident Council President that Resident #35 said when TA K was giving her hugs, he was making a motion as if humping her. Review of the Grievances dated 09/06/2022 revealed the following: (Activities Director and Social Worker in attendance and emergency Resident Council meeting was called) Social Worker - 1. Recognizing and reviewing malicious grievances. Just because you don't like someone is not a reason for a grievance. But if they are threatening you or bullying you or touching you in appropriately or when told not to. This is malicious grievance and should be told to an employee and written up. Harassing is not tolerated in this facility. 2. Only the employees are to call and talk to resident family. No one is to have the phone number It has been brought to the attention that a resident has been calling other resident family unless it's the resident themselves or have the business to call other than the facility or the resident in question. It has been brought to the attention that a resident has been calling other resident family or guardian . Review of the Grievances dated 09/15/2022 recorded by the Resident Council secretary revealed the following: During the 6:30 PM smoke break. One of the aides said something about the one in purple (Resident #35) thinking it was her (related to sexual assault allegation) Things got heated Then TA K said that at this facility the residents have many real Big Liars Then he started in on a soap box sermon about him and God are like that! And that those liars were going to Hell. The residents here will be struck down. I (resident #38 Resident Council Secretary). Told the charge nurse and she said that the incident was reported to her. I did not know that all the situation was not reported. Review of the Grievances dated 09/21/2022 recorded by the R revealed the following: TA K split up the smokers into 2 groups sending out one group. TA K kept stating that the Administrator told him he had to take us out into groups instead of all at once. No one was told of this until we were on our way to the patio. TA K told Resident #8 he could not come outside because he did not have cigarettes. Resident #38 was awakened at 11:30 PM by a loud noise in her room TA K told me If you have any complaints about me (beating his chest) then keep your mouth shut. He then turned to my roommate and asked her if she called the Administrator and report me. She said No. Then he said your neighbor is doing that. On the same day Resident #35 asked to keep her door open, and TA K yelled and slammed the door shut time was 10:15 PM During an interview with Administrator on 09/23/2022 at 4:40 PM she said TA K's only had abuse and neglect training completed with no other modules completed at the time of hire. Review of TA K's hire date provided by the facility was 08/16/2022. Record review of TA K's disciplinary action dated 08/31/2022 revealed the following: Final Warning- Time clock abuse - Not clocking out (5 hours left the building) contacting employees while investigation is ongoing - contacting and engaging with residents during investigation. Immediate termination if this problem occurs (Need) to follow command when leaving the building - clocking out when leaving the building - not reaching out to employees or residents when investigation is ongoing. Review of facility policy and procedure dated June 2021 titled, Abuse Prevention Program revealed the following [in part]: .2 Our residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation. The includes but is not limited to freedom from corporate punishment involuntary seclusion verbal mental sexual or physical abuses . 5. Our Center will not condone any form of resident abuse or neglect. To aid in abuse prevention, all personnel are to report any signs and symptoms of abuse/neglect to their supervisor and to the Abuse Prevention Coordinator immediately. 6. Our Center will protect residents from harm, reprisal, discriminating or coercion during investigations of abuse allegations. 7. All reports of resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property mistreatment and/or injuries of unknown source shall be promptly reported to local, state, and federal agencies and thoroughly investigated by the Center management. Findings of abuse investigation will also be reported. 8. Our Center will provide protection for the health, welfare and the rights of each resident residing in the Center to ensure the reporting of crimes. Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was identified on 09/23/2022 at 5:10 PM and the Administrator was informed. The IJ Template was provided at this time. The POR (Plan of Removal) was accepted on 9/24/2022 at 12:40 PM The POR revealed in part: Preparation and/or execution of this plan do not constitute admission or agreement by the provider that a deficiency exists. This response is also not to be construed as an admission of fault by the facility, its employees, agents, or other individuals who draft or may be discussed in this response and plan of removal. The facility failed to ensure residents were free from verbal, mental, or sexual abuse. Action Item: 1. Administrator and the DON were suspended on 9/24/22 pending investigation of incident 2. Review of all resident grievances to identify allegations of abuse; all allegations will be reported timely. All residents will be interviewed for active grievances and allegations of abuse 3. Review of all resident grievances occurs daily Monday through Friday in the morning meeting. Any allegations of abuse/neglect will be reported timely. 4. Resident grievance forms are posted on the walls in wall hangers throughout the center. The resident/representative can leave the form in the file folder outside the administrator's office, with or without signing the form. Resident counsel occurred on 9/24/22, the minutes include the grievance process, how to file an anonymous grievance, who the abuse coordinator is, how to report abuse, zero retaliation policy. 5. Staff interviews to be completed to identify allegations of abuse/neglect. If interviews identify allegations of abuse; all allegations will be reported timely. 6. Staff education on the grievance process to be presented written and verbally. Staff to complete posttest to demonstrate comprehension of material. 7. QA committee will review the POR is effective 8. Safe surveys will be completed with all residents that are interview able; responsible parties will be phone interviewed for all residents that are un-interview able and those residents will be assessed for signs of physical or psychosocial distress. 9. TA K has been terminated as of 9/22/22 and Activity Director will be suspended pending investigation on 9/23/22. 10. Physical and emotional assessments to be completed on all residents. Change of condition events to be completed as identified. The event includes physician and family/responsible parties. Notifications. The Medical Director and resident physicians were notified of the immediate jeopardy on 9/24/22. 11. Employee TA K has notified that he not allowed on property by the Regional Director of Operations on 9/24/22. Staff education completed on terminated employee TA not being allowed on property and to notify Regional Director of Operations and police if former staff member attempts to enter center to be presented written and verbally. Staff to complete posttest to demonstrate comprehension of material. Staff interviews to be completed to identify allegations of abuse/neglect. If interviews identify allegations of abuse; all allegations will be reported timely. Regional Director of Operations on 9/24/22 at 2:30 pm initiated education of employees. All will be completed by end of today except for one staff member who is out of state, another is on a second job. Will not be allowed to return to work until training is completed. Observation and interview with Regional Operations Manager 0n 09/25/2022 at 2:40 pm revealed signs related to Resident Council Minuets were posted in the lobby, 2 hallways and behind the glass board. Grievance forms were in the lobby area in a hanging file with signage. Grievance forms were placed in the box outside the Administrators door or can hand it to any department heads. Observation on 09/24/22 at 4:00 pm revealed Regional Operations Director conducting a Resident Council Meeting. He went over the grievance process, how to file a grievance and who the Grievance officer was. Interviewed the following residents on 9/24/2022 at 5:00 pm Resident #20, #31, #11, and #5, (all went to the Resident Council meeting), discussion included how to file a grievance, name of the grievance officer, and retaliation. One resident who did not attend the Resident Council meeting due to being on Transmission Based Precautions said staff came in and educated him on abuse and how to file a grievance. Interview with LVN C on 09/24/22 at 3:00 pm (day shift)stated she had an In-service this morning before she started work. She said she had another one at approx. 10:00 am and another one at 12:30 pm. In services were with ROM and MDS Nurse and BOM. She said in-services were about abuse and reporting abuse and she completed a written test. Interview with Housekeeping Supervisor on 09/24/22 at 3:10 pm (day shift)stated she had was in-service at 8:00 am and at 9:30 am by ROM and MDS Nurse. Housekeeping Supervisor Stated she in-services her employees this morning. Interview Housekeeper and Laundry Aide on 09/24/22 at 3:20 pm (day shift) said they were educated this morning by Housekeeping Supervisor on how to report abuse. Observation on 09/24/22 at 3:30 pm revealed, Business office Manager (BOM) in-servicing, LVN B and Home care 1 on (day shift) concerning Regional [NAME] President was acting Abuse Coordinator and how to report abuse, etc. Interview, with CNA F on 09/24/22 at 3:35 pm (day shift)stated she received education concerning how to recognize abuse and how to report it earlier this morning after the residents had breakfast. All staff educated by ROM took a written test scoring 80% or greater. Observation at 3:37pm revealed ROM educate CNA F concerning the Regional Operations Manager (ROM) is the abuse coordinator and how to report abuse. Interview with LVN B on 09/24/22 at 3:40 pm (day shift)stated she received training this morning shortly after she came to work his morning. The training was conducted by ROM. The training consisted of abuse, how to identify abuse and report it and took a written test. Interview with LVN D on 09/24/22 at 8:44 pm (night shift) said she was trained before shift by the BOM. The training consisted of abuse, how to identify and report abuse, who the abuse coordinator was and took a written test. Interview with CNA I on 09/24/22 at 8:56 pm said she was trained before shift by the BOM. The training consisted of abuse, how to identify and report abuse, who the abuse coordinator was and took a written test. Interview with LVN A on 09/24/22 at 9:00 pm said she was trained before shift by the BOM. The Training consisted of abuse, how to identify and report abuse, who the abuse coordinator was and took a written test. Staff Social Worker, CMA and PT (who are out of town and/or out of the country) will be interview regarding abuse and neglect prior to their shift. The Regional Operations Director, Administrator, DON, ADON, and Corporate Nurse were informed the Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 09/25/22 at 12:40 p.m. The facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of 2 with a scope of pattern due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems that were put into place.
CRITICAL (K)

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Investigate Abuse (Tag F0610)

Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to fully investigate, prevent, and correct an alleged vio...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to fully investigate, prevent, and correct an alleged violations of abuse and neglect for 4 (Resident #7, #8, #23, and #38,) of 21 on the North Hall and 2 (Resident #30 and #35) of 17 on the South Hall. The facility did not thoroughly investigate and correct an allegations of abuse that resulted in Resident #7, #8, #9, #23, 30, #35, and #38 causing psycho social harm and fearby TA K, while allowing him to continue working with residents in the facility. The Administrator and DON failed to provide residents necessary protection from staff member (TA K) who was threatening physical and verbal abuse in retaliation against residents who alleged incidents of his abusive behavior On 09/23/22 at 5:10 pm an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified. While the IJ was removed on 09/25/22 at 12:30 pm, the facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy with a scope of pattern due to the facility continuing to monitor the implementation and effectiveness of their plan of removal. The facility Administrator received the IJ template on 09/25/22 at 12:30 PM. This failure could place residents at risk of verbal, mental and physical abuse, neglect and mental anguish. Findings include: Resident #38 Record review of Resident #38's undated face sheet revealed she was a [AGE] year-old-female admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of necrotizing fasciitis (flesh eating bacteria), cellulitis of the lower limb, hypokalemia, abscess of the mouth, nausea vomiting, chronic diarrhea and pain in right toe. Record review of Resident #38's MDS re-admission dated 05/26/2022 revealed she had a BIMS (brief interview for memory status) of 15 indicating she was cognitively intact and able to make her needs known. Section G (functional status) revealed she required supervision for personal hygiene. Record review of Resident #38's Care Plan dated 05/22/2022 revealed she was at risk for falls, weight loss due to chronic diarrhea, and use of anti-depressant medication. Record review of Resident #38's physician orders dated 05/28/2022 initial orders revealed the following medications: Cymbalta 60 milligram (anti-depressant) 1 tablet a daily for depression. During initial tour of the facility on 09/20/22 at 9:35 AM, interview with Resident #38 asked the surveyor what she should do if a staff member threatened her for being a tattle tale. She said she would explain in further detail, but she was on her way to an outing with the activity director and fellow residents and would explain later. During an interview on 09/21/2022 at 8:00 AM, Resident #38 said TA K worked last night and told her that the state was in the building and that if she told on him (regarding the verbal abuse) it was going to be bad for her (threaten retribution) . She said it was an ongoing issue because of the problems he initially had with the smokers and the complaints against him regarding not giving showers and the allegation of being sexually inappropriate with Resident #35. She said she was afraid of him because of his behaviors, he yells at residents and slams doors and enter rooms without knocking. She said he worked last night (09/20/2022 6:00 PM to 09/21/2022 to 6:00 AM) and told her these things. She said she was told to sign the questionnaire when the thing with Resident #35 came up (sexual abuse allegation) but did not feel comfortable with it. During an interview 09/21/2022 at 8:10 AM with Resident #38's roommate ( Resident #9) who participates in the smoking area was alert and oriented times three (aware of person place and time). said she witnessed TA K making threatening remarks when he came into their room during his shift ( 09/20/2022 6:00 PM to 09/21/2022 to 6:00 AM)(but in the morning-unsure of the exact time) and accused Resident #9 of telling on him (regarding to the showers, and verbal abuse) and when Resident #9 said she did not tell on him, he then accused Resident #38 and said he would get her. Resident #38 understood TA K threatened to physically assault her. During an interview on 09/22/2022 at 2:00 PM with Resident #38, while she was on the telephone with her mother, her mother told the surveyor she was aware of the threats Resident #38 was receiving from TA K and hoped the surveyor will help resolve the threats she was receiving him (from TA K). Resident #35 Record review of Resident #35's undated face sheet revealed she was a [AGE] year-old-female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of: hypertension, heart failure, thrombosis of other thoracic veins (blood clot in thoracic vein), Weakness, Other muscle spasm, and need for assistance with personal care. Review of Resident #35's annual MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #35 had a BIMS of 15 indicating she was cognitively intact and able to make her needs known. Section G (Functional Status) revealed she required extensive assistance with dressing, bathing, toilet use and hygiene with one person assistance. Review of Resident #35's Care Plan dated 08/21/2022 revealed resident had communication difficulty, at risk for pressure ulcers, utilize wheelchair for mobility, risk for falls and morbidly obese. Review of the facility's Incident Report dated 08/31/2022 revealed the following: Sexual assault allegation reported by resident (Resident #35) Resident stated male CNA (TA K) hugged her and made a humping movement rubbed his penis against her arms. Resident said she told male CNA (TA K) to stop. Male CNA (TA K) suspended until further notice pending investigation of allegation of sexual assault allegations . Authorities notified . Review of Police Report (undated report case #22-02928) revealed Insufficient evidence to substantiate the assault and the State Agency investigator did not find sufficient evidence to substantiate the allegation. Resident #35 disputed their findings and feared TA K. During Resident Council meeting on 09/21/2022 at 10:15 AM, 14 residents attended, Resident #35 was the president of the council (preceding over the meeting). Residents 6 of (14) expressed grievances regarding TA K because he said he would only give out two cigarettes due to the residents complaining about him about showers. The said he told the residents on the smoke break he can do whatever he wanted to and when he gives out the cigarettes for the breaks even though three cigarettes were giving on other breaks. Several (4 on the north hall) residents said TA K would go up and down the hall and slam doors, yell at residents and just walk into rooms without knocking and especially when the ladies were dressing. Surveyor asked residents attending the Resident Council Meeting how many people were afraid of TA, 9 residents held up their hands including Resident #7, #,8, #23, #35 and #38 (4 others did not wish to be identified). Resident #8 Review of Resident #8's undated face sheet revealed she was a [AGE] year-old-female re-admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of: bipolar disorder, gout (excessive uric acid collected in joints), pain in ankle and foot, insomnia (difficulty sleeping). Review of Resident #8's last assessed MDS dated [DATE] revealed she had a BIMS score of 12 indicating she was moderately cognitively impaired but able to make her needs known. Section G (Function Status) revealed she needed set up and supervision with personal hygiene. Review of Resident #8's Care Plan dated 10/11/2018 revealed to participate in activities, risk for falls due to safety awareness, and chronic illness due to lupus (autoimmune syndrome). During interview on 09/22/2022 at 10:50 AM Resident #8 said, TA K would yell at the residents and would bump into them inappropriately hugging them. She said she was afraid of TA K; he had a habit of coming into women's room not knocking when he knew they were dressing. She said she was afraid of him because he was always threatening the residents in one way or another (unspecific regarding threats). She said she was told to sign the questionnaire (about Resident #35's sexual assault allegation and if they felt safe) and was uncomfortable about being identified. During an interview on 09/22/2022 at 2:20 PM with Resident #8's family member, (son) said she mentioned the inappropriate behavior TA K displayed (inappropriate hugging, yelling at residents, slamming doors making threatening comments) and he was in the process of getting her moved out. Resident #23 Review of Resident #23's undated face sheet revealed she was a [AGE] year-old-female re-admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of: Displaced fracture of base of neck of left femur, Overactive bladder, Pneumonia, abnormalities of gait and mobility. Review of Resident #23's Initial MDS dated [DATE] revealed she had a BIMS score of 14 indicating she was cognitively intact and able to make her needs known. Section G (Function Status) revealed she required extensive assistance with personal hygiene. Review of Resident #23's Care Plan dated 08/10/2022 revealed she was at risk for pressure ulcers and at risk for anemia. During an interview with Resident #23 on 09/22/2022 at 11:05 AM, she said TA K came one night to change her and told her we need to make love. She said she told him that was a very inappropriate statement. She said, he said she misunderstood him and changed her brief. She said he made her very uncomfortable, and she was lucky she only needed to be changed one time. She said her family member, Resident #32 (lives in same room) said he did not hear the conversation, but TA K goes down the hall and yells and was very loud. Resident #30 Review of Resident #30's undated face sheet revealed he was a [AGE] year-old-male admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of: Malignant neoplasm of bronchus or lung (Admission), anxiety disorder, Pain, and displaced fracture of surgical neck of left humerus. Review of Resident #30's MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS of 3 indicating he was severely cognitively impaired. Section G (Function Status) revealed he required extensive assistance for personal hygiene. During one-on-one interview with Resident #30 on 09/23/2022 3:00 PM, he stated he was familiar with TA K, and he worked the night shift. He stated he was uncomfortable around him and felt intimidated. He stated he would rather stay wet than ask him for help because he could tell it (changing his briefs from an incontinent episode) made TA K mad. He stated no one else made him feel that way. He stated TA K acted mad and smarted off to us when he took the smokers out to smoke. He stated he could not remember what he said but he knew TA K made him feel bad He could not remember a specific date or time. Resident #7 Review of Resident #7's undated face sheet revealed he was a [AGE] year-old-male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of: Chronic pain due to trauma, Anorexia nervosa, binge eating/purging type, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, Tachycardia, Gastro-esophageal reflux disease with esophagitis, Heart failure, disorder of thyroid, Vascular dementia with behavior disturbances. Review of Resident #7's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed he had a BIMS score of 15 indicating he was cognitively intact and able to make his needs known. Section G (Functional Section) revealed he required extensive assistance for personal hygiene. During an interview with Resident #7 on 09/22/2022 at 2:45 PM, he said he was always arguing with TA K because he always made a fuss about changing him. He said he called him a bitch and not being a man because Resident #7 needed someone to change him. (Resident #7 said no use to complaining because no one does anything about it. He said they (residents) complain about TA K, but nothing is done (Resident Council grievances) During an interview with the Administrator and DON on 09/22/2022 at 11:40 AM, they said they must find out what was going on. The Administrator said she found out TA K left one night and went home around 11:00 PM (disciplinary documentation stated date of incident 08/31/2022) and was missing for 5 hours. The Administrator said human resources (corporate) told Administrator and DON they had the options of terminating him or counsel him and allow him to return to work. She said we were given that options. The DON said the Aide who worked with him said he left for 5 hours and fell asleep at home. The Administrator said HR (human resources) told them it was clear cut reason to terminate him, but we were given the option of counseling him. The Administrator and DON stated they chose to allow him to return to work. Interview with the Activity Director on 09/22/2022 at 12:15 PM, said she was aware of the problems the residents who participates in the smoke breaks during the smoke breaks (#7, #8, #9 #35, and #38 and four more not willing to be identified) was having with TA (transition assistant) and has given the Resident Council minutes to the ADON (resident council minutes and grievances were reviewed by surveyor prior to the Resident Council meeting on 09/21/2022 at 10:15 AM) and they discuss the problem in the stand-up meetings (morning meeting of facility department heads). She said they counseled him and let him come back. She said she has no influence on who to hire or fire. She said, all I can do is make the Administrator know. During an interview with Resident #38 on 09/22/2022 at 12:35 PM, said the call lights will turn on and a light will come on outside the room, but the alarm will not come on. Resident #38 resides on the hall where TA K works. Resident #38 said because the call lights would not sound, he TA K could be verbally and mentally abusive. Resident #38 said because of the sexual abuse allegation TA K had to work on the North Hall the call lights would not sound he TA K could be threatening, yell at the resident slam doors and threaten them. Observation of Resident #38's Call light being turned on 09/22/2022 at 12:35 PM revealed the light outside of her room coming on but not audible sound coming on. Observation on 09/23/2022 at 9:30 AM alarm system was checked on the North Hall, in the center of the hall a switch could be turn off and on. When the switch was in the Off position, the audio alarm did not activate when the resident activated the call light system in their room. When the switch was in the on position, the audio alarm sounded when the call light was activated by the resident. Resident #38 said because the call lights would not sound, he TA K could be verbally and mentally abusive. During an interview with ADON on 09/22/2022 at 4:35 PM, she said she has never been given any of the grievances or Resident Council minutes by the Activities Director and has not been aware of residents being threatened. During an interview with the Administrator on 09/23/2022 at 10:40 AM, surveyor asked if she was aware of the complaints from the residents, that they were being threatened by TA K. She said this was the first time she heard about the complaints and never received any of the Resident Council Minutes or grievances. Administrator was told by the survey team. During interview with CNA I on 09/23/2022 at 3:00 PM, she said she was working the South Hall and noticed the call light panel going off for residents on the North Hall. She said TA K was only allowed to work the North Hall because of the allegations of sexual abuse alleged by Resident #35. She said she went to the North Hall and noticed several call lights on and took care of the residents. She said she then texted TA K and asked where he was, she said he wrote back and said he went home and fell asleep. She said he said he will be back. She said he did not come back untill 5 AM in the morning. She said he threatened her if she told anyone. CNA I was unspecific about the threat but noticed someone was trying to vandalize her car the next night She called the Administrator who said not to take any more calls from him. Record review revealed inappropriate behavior dated 09/21/2022 at 6:00 AM ADON confronted TA K regarding his charting .he did not give a fuck about charting the point of care in the computer, and they would not be done. She said she asked him to discuss the matter with her and he said, he did not have to talk to her . The Administrator told ADON to write down this encounter for disciplinary action. Attempts to interview TA K was made on 09/23/2022 at 2:00 PM, Regional Operations Manager also attempted to call TA K at an undisclosed time on 09/23/2022 for an interview he said TA K hung up the telephone and would not speak to the Regional Operations Manager as told to surveyors. Attempts to interview Charge nurse on 09/23/2022 regarding TA K leaving the facility for 5 hours was made without success in returning telephone calls. During an interview with the Administrator 09/25/2022 at 2:30 PM, she said Resident #35 came to her and said TA K was telling us on smoke break we were all a bunch of liars, and he would preach about he was tight with God, and we were going to hell and Resident #35 was making up the sexual assault allegation. She said regarding the interview of CNA L, Administrator said because of the sexual abuse allegation there were not to be any discussions about what happened that was why she told her not to take any more calls from TA K. When asked by the surveyors what the Administrator thought about TA K calling the residents liars and preaching, she said she told TA K not to preach to the residents anymore. Administrator added TA K has been terminated. Review of Email provided by Administrator to Human Resources dated 09/23/2022 at 8:10 AM confirmed termination of TA K. Review of the Grievances dated 08/28/2022 On 6:30 PM recorded by the Resident Council secretary revealed: during smoke break TA K informed everyone that we were only getting two cigarettes instead of three that we usually get for the last smoke break of the day. When asked why he said we complained about the showers not being given then we were to have our break cut short. Then asked if it was the nurses or the management, he said it was his decision and if we did not like it that we could go in and not go bother to come out for the next smoke break that he would be taking us out on. He told a group since he got in trouble that we were only getting two cigarettes instead of the three. He continues to push the issue about showers so that Resident #7 was the blame for only getting two cigarettes since he complained about the showers . TA K said he was taking us out of the kindness of his heart. TA K continued to argue with Resident #35 and said he was in charge and that what he says is final and if we don't like it, there is the door. It was brought to my attention as Resident Council Secretary by Resident Council President that Resident #35 said when TA K was giving her hugs, he was making a motion as if humping her. Review of the Grievances dated 09/06/2022 revealed the following: (Activities Director and Social Worker in attendance and emergency Resident Council meeting was called) Social Worker - 1. Recognizing and reviewing malicious grievances. Just because you don't like someone is not a reason for a grievance. But if they are threatening you or bullying you or touching you in appropriately or when told not to. This is malicious grievance and should be told to an employee and written up. Harassing is not tolerated in this facility. 2. Only the employees are to call and talk to resident family. No one is to have the phone number It has been brought to the attention that a resident has been calling other resident family unless it's the resident themselves or have the business to call other than the facility or the resident in question. It has been brought to the attention that a resident has been calling other resident family or guardian . Review of the Grievances dated 09/15/2022 recorded by the Resident Council secretary revealed the following: During the 6:30 PM smoke break. One of the aides said something about the one in purple (Resident #35) thinking it was her (related to sexual assault allegation) Things got heated Then TA K said that at this facility the residents have many real Big Liars Then he started in on a soap box sermon about him and God are like that! And that those liars were going to Hell. The residents here will be struck down. I (resident #38 Resident Council Secretary). Told the charge nurse and she said that the incident was reported to her. I did not know that all the situation was not reported. Review of the Grievances dated 09/21/2022 recorded by the R revealed the following: TA K split up the smokers into 2 groups sending out one group. TA K kept stating that the Administrator told him he had to take us out into groups instead of all at once. No one was told of this until we were on our way to the patio. TA K told Resident #8 he could not come outside because he did not have cigarettes. Resident #38 was awakened at 11:30 PM by a loud noise in her room TA K told me If you have any complaints about me (beating his chest) then keep your mouth shut. He then turned to my roommate and asked her if she called the Administrator and report me. She said No. Then he said your neighbor is doing that. On the same day Resident #35 asked to keep her door open, and TA K yelled and slammed the door shut time was 10:15 PM During an interview with Administrator on 09/23/2022 at 4:40 PM she said TA K's only had abuse and neglect training completed with no other modules completed at the time of hire. Review of TA K's hire date provided by the facility was 08/16/2022. Record review of TA K's disciplinary action dated 08/31/2022 revealed the following: Final Warning- Time clock abuse - Not clocking out (5 hours left the building) contacting employees while investigation is ongoing - contacting and engaging with residents during investigation. Immediate termination if this problem occurs (Need) to follow command when leaving the building - clocking out when leaving the building - not reaching out to employees or residents when investigation is ongoing. Review of facility policy and procedure dated June 2021 titled, Abuse Prevention Program revealed the following [in part]: .2 Our residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation. The includes but is not limited to freedom from corporate punishment involuntary seclusion verbal mental sexual or physical abuses . 5. Our Center will not condone any form of resident abuse or neglect. To aid in abuse prevention, all personnel are to report any signs and symptoms of abuse/neglect to their supervisor and to the Abuse Prevention Coordinator immediately. 6. Our Center will protect residents from harm, reprisal, discriminating or coercion during investigations of abuse allegations. 7. All reports of resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property mistreatment and/or injuries of unknown source shall be promptly reported to local, state, and federal agencies and thoroughly investigated by the Center management. Findings of abuse investigation will also be reported. 8. Our Center will provide protection for the health, welfare and the rights of each resident residing in the Center to ensure the reporting of crimes. Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was identified on 09/23/2022 at 5:10 PM and the administrator was informed. The IJ template was provided at this time. The POR (Plan of Removal) was accepted on 9/24/2022 at 12:40 PM The POR revealed in part: Preparation and/or execution of this plan do not constitute admission or agreement by the provider that a deficiency exists. This response is also not to be construed as an admission of fault by the facility, its employees, agents, or other individuals who draft or may be discussed in this response and plan of removal. The facility failed to ensure residents were free from verbal, mental, or sexual abuse. Action Item: 1. Administrator and the DON were suspended on 9/24/22 pending investigation of incident 2. Review of all resident grievances to identify allegations of abuse; all allegations will be reported timely. All residents will be interviewed for active grievances and allegations of abuse 3. Review of all resident grievances occurs daily Monday through Friday in the morning meeting. Any allegations of abuse/neglect will be reported timely. 4. Resident grievance forms are posted on the walls in wall hangers throughout the center. The resident/representative can leave the form in the file folder outside the administrator's office, with or without signing the form. Resident counsel occurred on 9/24/22, the minutes include the grievance process, how to file an anonymous grievance, who the abuse coordinator is, how to report abuse, zero retaliation policy. 5. Staff interviews to be completed to identify allegations of abuse/neglect. If interviews identify allegations of abuse; all allegations will be reported timely. 6. Staff education on the grievance process to be presented written and verbally. Staff to complete posttest to demonstrate comprehension of material. 7. QA committee will review the POR is effective 8. Safe surveys will be completed with all residents that are interview able; responsible parties will be phone interviewed for all residents that are un-interview able and those residents will be assessed for signs of physical or psychosocial distress. 9. TA K has been terminated as of 9/22/22 and Activity Director will be suspended pending investigation on 9/23/22. 10. Physical and emotional assessments to be completed on all residents. Change of condition events to be completed as identified. The event includes physician and family/responsible parties. Notifications. The Medical Director and resident physicians were notified of the immediate jeopardy on 9/24/22. 11. Employee TA K has notified that he not allowed on property by the Regional Director of Operations on 9/24/22. Staff education completed on terminated employee TA not being allowed on property and to notify Regional Director of Operations and police if former staff member attempts to enter center to be presented written and verbally. Staff to complete posttest to demonstrate comprehension of material. Staff interviews to be completed to identify allegations of abuse/neglect. If interviews identify allegations of abuse; all allegations will be reported timely. Regional Director of Operations on 9/24/22 at 2:30 pm initiated education of employees. All will be completed by end of today except for one staff member who is out of state, another is on a second job. Will not be allowed to return to work until training is completed. Observation and interview with Regional Operations Manager 0n 09/25/2022 at 2:40 pm revealed signs related to Resident Council Minuets were posted in the lobby, 2 hallways and behind the glass board. Grievance forms were in the lobby area in a hanging file with signage. Grievance forms were placed in the box outside the Administrators door or can hand it to any department heads. Observation on 09/24/22 at 4:00 pm revealed Regional Operations Director conducting a Resident Council Meeting. He went over the grievance process, how to file a grievance and who the Grievance officer was. Interviewed the following residents on 9/24/2022 at 5:00 pm Resident #20, #31, #11, and #5, (all went to the Resident Council meeting), discussion included how to file a grievance, name of the grievance officer, and retaliation. One resident who did not attend the Resident Council meeting due to being on Transmission Based Precautions said staff came in and educated him on abuse and how to file a grievance. Interview with LVN C on 09/24/22 at 3:00 pm (day shift)stated she had an In-service this morning before she started work. She said she had another one at approx. 10:00 am and another one at 12:30 pm. In services were with ROM and MDS Nurse and BOM. She said in-services were about abuse and reporting abuse and she completed a written test. Interview with Housekeeping Supervisor on 09/24/22 at 3:10 pm (day shift)stated she had was in-service at 8:00 am and at 9:30 am by ROM and MDS Nurse. Housekeeping Supervisor Stated she in-services her employees this morning. Interview Housekeeper and Laundry Aide on 09/24/22 at 3:20 pm (day shift) said they were educated this morning by Housekeeping Supervisor on how to report abuse. Observation on 09/24/22 at 3:30 pm revealed, Business office Manager (BOM) in-servicing, LVN B and Home care 1 on (day shift) concerning Regional [NAME] President was acting Abuse Coordinator and how to report abuse, etc. Interview, with CNA F on 09/24/22 at 3:35 pm (day shift)stated she received education concerning how to recognize abuse and how to report it earlier this morning after the residents had breakfast. All staff educated by ROM took a written test scoring 80% or greater. Observation at 3:37pm revealed ROM educate CNA F concerning the Regional Operations Manager (ROM) is the abuse coordinator and how to report abuse. Interview with LVN B on 09/24/22 at 3:40 pm (day shift)stated she received training this morning shortly after she came to work his morning. The training was conducted by ROM. The training consisted of abuse, how to identify abuse and report it and took a written test. Interview with LVN D on 09/24/22 at 8:44 pm (night shift) said she was trained before shift by the BOM. The training consisted of abuse, how to identify and report abuse, who the abuse coordinator was and took a written test. Interview with CNA I on 09/24/22 at 8:56 pm said she was trained before shift by the BOM. The training consisted of abuse, how to identify and report abuse, who the abuse coordinator was and took a written test. Interview with LVN A on 09/24/22 at 9:00 pm said she was trained before shift by the BOM. The Training consisted of abuse, how to identify and report abuse, who the abuse coordinator was and took a written test. Staff Social Worker, CMA and PT (who are out of town and/or out of the country) will be interview regarding abuse and neglect prior to their shift. The Regional Operations Director, Administrator, DON, ADON, and Corporate Nurse were informed the Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 09/25/22 at 12:40 p.m. The facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of 2 with a scope of pattern due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems that were put into place.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

PASARR Coordination (Tag F0644)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all pre-admission screening and resident review (PASRR) prog...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all pre-admission screening and resident review (PASRR) program, for 1 of 2 residents (Residents #30) reviewed for PASRR evaluations. The facility failed to accurately complete the PASRR 1012 form for Resident # 30. This failure could affect residents with psychiatric diagnoses who may not be evaluated and receive needed PASRR services. The findings included: Review of Resident# 30's Face Sheet revealed she was an [AGE] year-old female originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had a most recent date of 8/25/21. Resident 301's diagnoses included: Dementia with behavioral disturbances (onset 12/28/20) schizophrenia (onset 7/31/21), anxiety disorder (6/11/20), and major depressive disorder recurrent (0nset3/25/20) Other specified Depressive Disorders, Post Traumatic Stress Disorder and Anxiety Disorder. Review of a Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #30 could usually understand others and was usually understood by others; had severe cognitive impairment with a BIMS of 3, no mood or behavior concerns were indicated. Review of Resident #30's Physician Orders dated 9//24/2022 revealed an order for mirtazapine; (15mg, amt: 1; oral, at bedtime; for Major Depressive disorder single episode), trazadone; (50mg, amt: 1; oral, at bedtime for insomnia), and Seroquel; (50mg, amt: 1; oral, at bedtime for hallucinations) Review of Resident #30's Care Plan dated 8/30/2022 revealed complications associated with psychotropic medications and to monitor for target behaviors, there was no mental health or PASRR areas care planned. Review of Resident #1's PASRR Level One Screening Forms dated 1/5/21 revealed Resident # 1012 form was not completed or submitted. Review of records Resident #30's form 10 12 was completed and signed by the physician on 9/22/22. Interview with the DON on 9/22/2022 at 10:39 AM, revealed that PASRR and 1012 forms are completed by the MDS Coordinator. The expectations were for forms, including 1012 forms, to be updated immediately after being identified or an acute clinical change. This would ensure that the resident would receive the services he/she needs. The risk of not doing it would be a delay in mental health services that could produce a negative outcome for the resident. In an interview on 9/22/22 04:18 PM the MDS Nurse stated she was the MDS Nurse for two facilities. She then viewed the LTC portal and stated that a PE had not been done. She stated she did not know why the resident had not had a PASSR level 2 done. She stated the company has an MDS Consultant that usually reviews diagnoses for changes. She stated she will email her LMHA to complete a PE. She has not done a form 1012 and was not familiar with the process. She stated she took PASSAR training modules and a MDS 3.0 Course as training. She had no prior experience as an MDS nurse before starting this position in November. Record review of the facility's policy, Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) revised on 5/21/22 stated that 3. A resident with MI or ID/DD must have a resident review conducted when there is a significant change in the resident's condition. The nursing facility is required to notify the LIDS or the LMHA. a. The CCM must ensure the 1012 form is completed. b. Please note the 1012 may only be signed by the physician if the person has a diagnosis of dementia or does not have an MI.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0726 (Tag F0726)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure nurse aides are able to demonstrate appropriate competencies...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure nurse aides are able to demonstrate appropriate competencies and skills sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident for TA K who was 1 of 9 (CNA F, CNA G, CNA H, CNA I, CNA L, CNA M, CNA N, TA O) CNAs, and [NAME] reviewed. TA K (Training Aide) was not trained in the competency in skills and techniques necessary to care for residents' needs. This failure could place residents requiring incontinent care at risk for the spread of infections, skin breakdown, and decreased quality of life. Findings included: Record Review of the Personnel Files for TA K (Training Aide) revealed a hire date of 08/02/22. Record Review of staffing sheets for the months of August 2022 and September 2022 revealed TA K worked on 08/22/22, 08/23/22, 08/27/22, 08/28/22, 09/14/22, 09/15/22, 09/19/22, and 09/20/22. TA Ks (Training Aide) duties were to provide direct resident care which included providing ADL care (Activities of Daily Living) Review of TA K's training revealed he only had abuse and neglect completed with no other modules completed at the time of hire. There was no competency checks of skills or record of the TA training completed for TA K. Interview on 09/25/22 at 9:30 AM, the Administrator said there were required modules that must be completed by each employee prior to them providing any form of resident care and the training records were in the employee's personnel file. Interview on 09/25/22 at 10:30 AM, the DON stated, all employee training was in the personnel file and certain modules must be completed before the employee hits the floor. Interview on 09/25/22 at 10:30 AM, the BOM stated, I've only been employed here a week and I have not been through all of the files. Record review of the facility's Competency of Nursing Staff Policy with a revision date of May 2019 indicated the following [In-part]: 1. All nursing staff must meet the specific competency requirements of their respective licensure and certification requirements defined by State law. 2. In addition, licensed nurses and nursing assistants employed (or contracted) by the facility will: participate in a facility-specific, competency-based staff development and training program; and demonstrate specific competencies and skill sets deemed necessary to care for the needs of residents, as identified through resident assessments and described in the plans of care. 3. The facility assessment includes an evaluation of the staff competencies that are necessary to provide the level and types of care specific to the resident population. 4. Competency in skills and techniques necessary to care for residents' needs includes but is not limited to competencies in areas such as: Preventing abuse, neglect, and exploitation of resident property. Dementia management. Resident rights. Person centered care. Communication. Basic nursing skills. Basic restorative services. Skin and wound care. Medication management. Pain management. Infection control. Identification of changes in condition; and 5. Training and competency evaluations include elements of critical thinking and processes necessary to identify and report resident changes of condition. The type and amount of this training is based on the facility assessment and is specific to the different skill levels and licensure of staff. For example, CNAs are trained for and evaluated on competency in identifying and reporting resident changes of condition to the LPN or RN, while LPNs and RNs are trained for and evaluated on managing and reporting pertinent findings to the provider. 6. Facility and resident-specific competency evaluations will be conducted upon hire, annually and as deemed necessary based on the facility assessment. 7. Facility and resident-specific competency evaluations will include: Lecture with return demonstration for physical activities. A pre-and post-test for documentation issues. Demonstrated ability to use tools, devices, or equipment used to care for residents. Reviewing adverse events that occurred as an indication of gaps in competency; or Demonstrated ability to perform activities that are within the scope of practice an individual is licensed or certified to perform. 8. Competency demonstrations will be evaluated based on the staff member's ability to use and integrate knowledge and skills obtained in training, which will be evaluated by staff already deemed competent in that skill or knowledge. 9. Inquiries concerning staff competency evaluations should be referred to the Director of Nursing Services or to the Personnel Director.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Medication Errors (Tag F0758)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents with PRN orders for psychotropic drugs were l...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents with PRN orders for psychotropic drugs were limited to 14 days for 1 (Resident#30) of 21 residents whose medication regimens were reviewed in that: Resident #30's order for PRN Lorazepam (antianxiety medication) was not discontinued after 14 days. This failure could place residents administered PRN psychotropic medications at risk of adverse side effects from prolonged use of psychotropic medications including stroke and death. Findings Included: Resident #30 Review of Resident #30's face sheet not dated revealed that he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was [AGE] years old. Review of Resident #30's CCD dated 9/25/22 revealed that he had diagnoses including anxiety disorder, displaced fracture or left humerus, malignant neoplasm of lung, and muscle weakness. Review of Resident #30's significant change MDS dated [DATE] documented in part that he had a BIMS score of 3 (Severe Cognitive Impairment). During the seven-day look-back period he had not received anti-anxiety medications. No behavioral symptoms were documented. Review of Resident #30's pharmacy consultant reviews for September did not reveal to the consultant pharmacist recommended that the resident's order for Lorazepam be discontinued because the 14-day maximum allowed prescribed length for prn psychotrophic medications had been met. Review of Resident #30's Physician Orders dated 03/20/22 revealed that the resident was to continue receiving lorazepam 2mg every 3 hours PRN, lorazepam 1 mg q 2 hours prn, and there was also another order for lorazepam 1 mg every 2 hours prn for anxiety dated 3/15/ 22. The orders did not specify a stop date. Review of Resident #30's Medication administration records dated 8/1/22 through 8/24/22 and 8/25 through 9/24/22 did not reveal any documentation of prn lorazepam 0.5, mg, 1 mg or the 2mg tablets as given. Record review of the progress notes dated 8/1/22 through 8/24/22 and 8/25 through 9/24/22 did not reveal any documentation of prn lorazepam 0.5, mg, 1 mg or the 2mg tablets as given. Review of Resident #30's narcotic control drug sheet revealed the lorazepam 2mg tablets had been given on 8/1/22 and 8/7/22. In an interview on 9/23/22 at 3:42 PM, Assistant Director of Nurses stated that PRN orders for psychotropic medications were to be discontinued after 14 days and that justification from the prescriber was required for PRN orders for psychotropic medications that extended beyond the 14-day limit. She stated she did not know why the lorazepam continued to be ordered as a prn medication. She stated the nurses, ADON and DON were responsible to see that prn psychotrophic medication were not administered prn longer than 14 days. Review of the facility policy titled Behavioral Assessment, Intervention and Monitoring and Antipsychotic Medication Use revised September 2019 stated in part: 3. The facility will comply with regulatory requirements related to the use of medications to manage behavioral symptoms. 8. Interventions and approaches will be based on a detailed assessment of physical, psychological and behavioral symptoms and their underlying causes, as well as the potential situational and environmental reasons for the behavior. The care plan will include, as a minimum: a. A description of the behavioral symptoms, including: (1) Frequency; (2) Intensity; (3) Duration; (4) Outcomes; (5) Location; (6) Environment; and (7) Precipitating factors or situations. b. Targeted and individualized interventions for the behavioral and/or psychosocial symptoms; c. The rationale for the interventions and approaches; d. Specific and measurable goals for targeted behaviors; and e. How the staff will monitor for effectiveness of the interventions. 9. Non-pharmacologic approaches will be utilized to the extent possible to avoid or reduce the use of antipsychotic medications to manage behavioral symptoms. 10. When medications are prescribed for behavioral symptoms, documentation will include: a. Rationale for use; b. Potential underlying causes of the behavior; c. Other approaches and interventions tried prior to the use of antipsychotic medications; d. Potential risks and benefits of medications as discussed with the resident and/or family; e. Specific target behaviors and expected outcomes; f. Dosage; g. Duration; h. Monitoring for efficacy and adverse consequences; and i. Plans (if applicable) for gradual dose reduction. 11. The Director of Nursing, or designee, will evaluate whether the staffing needs have changed based on acuity of the residents and their plans of care. Additional staff and/or staff training will be provided if it determined that the needs of the residents cannot be met with the current level of staff or staff training.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Resident Rights (Tag F0550)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with respect and dignity, and care for...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with respect and dignity, and care for each resident in a manner, and in an environment which promoted maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, and recognizing each resident's individuality for 4 of 21 Residents (Residents #7, #8, #23, and #38,) on the North Hall and 2 of 17 Residents (Residents #30 and #35) on the South Hall of the facility reviewed for Dignity. The facility failed to ensure Residents #7, #8, #9, #23, #30, #35 and #38 dignity was protect when a TA (Transition Aide) was verbally abusive and threatened the residents. This failure could place residents at risk of feeling uncomfortable and disrespected and could decrease residents' self-esteem and/or quality of life. Findings include: Resident #38 Record review of Resident #38's undated face sheet revealed she was a [AGE] year-old-female admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of necrotizing fasciitis (flesh eating bacteria), cellulitis of the lower limb, hypokalemia, abscess of the mouth, nausea vomiting, chronic diarrhea and pain in right toe. Record review of Resident #38's MDS re-admission dated 05/26/2022 revealed she had a BIMS (brief interview for memory status) of 15 indicating she was cognitively intact and able to make her needs known. Section G (functional status) revealed she required supervision for personal hygiene. Record review of Resident #38's Care Plan dated 05/22/2022 revealed she was at risk for falls, weight loss due to chronic diarrhea, and use of anti-depressant medication. Record review of Resident #38's physician orders dated 05/28/2022 initial orders revealed the following medications: Cymbalta 60 milligram (anti-depressant) 1 tablet a daily for depression. During initial tour of the facility on 09/20/22 at 9:35 AM, interview with Resident #38 asked the surveyor what she should do if a staff member threatened her for being a tattle tale. She said she would explain in further detail, but she was on her way to an outing with the activity director and fellow residents and would explain later. During an interview on 09/21/2022 at 8:00 AM, Resident #38 said TA K worked last night and told her that the state was in the building and that if she told on him (regarding the verbal abuse) it was going to be bad for her (threaten retribution) . She said it was an ongoing issue because of the problems he initially had with the smokers and the complaints against him regarding not giving showers and the allegation of being sexually inappropriate with Resident #35. She said she was afraid of him because of his behaviors, he yells at residents and slams doors and enter rooms without knocking. She said he worked last night (09/20/2022 6:00 PM to 09/21/2022 to 6:00 AM) and told her these things. She said she was told to sign the questionnaire when the thing with Resident #35 came up (sexual abuse allegation) did not feel comfortable with it. During an interview 09/21/2022 at 8:10 AM with Resident #38's roommate ( Resident #9) who participates in the smoking area was alert and oriented times three (aware of person place and time). said she witnessed TA K making threatening remarks when he came into their room during his shift ( 09/20/2022 6:00 PM to 09/21/2022 to 6:00 AM)(but in the morning-unsure of the exact time) and accused Resident #9 of telling on him (regarding to the showers, and verbal abuse) and when Resident #9 said she did not tell on him, he then accused Resident #38 and said he would get her (implying potential injury or abuse). During an interview on 09/22/2022 at 2:00 PM with Resident #38, while she was on the telephone with her mother, her mother told the surveyor she was aware of the threats Resident #38 was receiving from TA K and hoped the surveyor will help resolve the threats she was receiving from him (from TA K). Record review of Resident #35's undated face sheet revealed she was a [AGE] year-old-female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of: hypertension, heart failure, thrombosis of other thoracic veins (blood clot in thoracic vein), Weakness, Other muscle spasm, and need for assistance with personal care. Review of Resident #35's annual MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #35 had a BIMS of 15 indicating she was cognitively intact and able to make her needs known. Section G (Functional Status) revealed she required extensive assistance with dressing, bathing, toilet use and hygiene with one person assistance. Review of Resident #35's Care Plan dated 08/21/2022 revealed resident had communication difficulty, at risk for pressure ulcers, utilize wheelchair for mobility, risk for falls and morbidly obese. Review of the facility's Incident Report dated 08/31/2022 revealed the following: Sexual assault allegation reported by resident (Resident #35) Resident stated male CNA (TA K) hugged her and made a humping movement rubbed his penis against her arms. Resident said she told male CNA (TA K) to stop. Male CNA (TA K) suspended until further notice pending investigation of allegation of sexual assault allegations . Authorities notified . Review of Police Report (undated report case #22-02928) revealed Assault checked of the form. Further investigation by the police unsubstantiated the allegation as well as DHS investigator. During Resident Council meeting on 09/21/2022 at 10:15 AM, 14 residents attended, Resident #35 was the president of the council (preceding over the meeting). Residents 6 of (14) expressed grievances regarding TA K because he said he would only give out two cigarettes due to the residents complaining about him about showers. They said he told the residents on the smoke break he can do whatever he wanted to and when he gives out the cigarettes for the breaks even though three cigarettes were giving on other breaks. Several (4 on the north hall) residents said TA K would go up and down the hall and slam doors, yell at residents and just walk into rooms without knocking and especially when the ladies were dressing. Surveyor asked residents attending the Resident Council Meeting how many people were afraid of TA K, 9 residents held up their hands including Resident #7, #,8, #23, #35 and #38 (4 others did not wish to be identified). Review of Resident #8's undated face sheet revealed she was a [AGE] year-old-female re-admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of: bipolar disorder, gout (excessive uric acid collected in joints), pain in ankle and foot, insomnia (difficulty sleeping). Review of Resident #8's last assessed MDS dated [DATE] revealed she had a BIMS score of 12 indicating she was moderately cognitively impaired but able to make her needs known. Section G (Function Status) revealed she needed set up and supervision with personal hygiene. Review of Resident #8's Care Plan dated 10/11/2018 revealed to participate in activities, risk for falls due to safety awareness, and chronic illness due to lupus (autoimmune syndrome). During interview on 09/22/2022 at 10:50 AM Resident #8 said, TA K would yell at the residents and would bump into them inappropriately hugging them. She said she was afraid of TA K; he had a habit of coming into women's room not knocking when he knew they were dressing. She said she was afraid of him because he was always threatening the residents in one way or another (unspecific regarding threats). She said she was told to sign the questionnaire (about Resident #35's sexual assault allegation and if they felt safe) and was uncomfortable about being identified. During an interview on 09/22/2022 at 2:20 PM with Resident #8's family member, (son) said she mentioned the inappropriate behavior TA K displayed (inappropriate hugging, yelling at residents, slamming doors making threatening comments) and he was in the process of getting her moved out. Review of Resident #23's undated face sheet revealed she was a [AGE] year-old-female re-admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of: Displaced fracture of base of neck of left femur, Overactive bladder, Pneumonia, abnormalities of gait and mobility. Review of Resident #23's Initial MDS dated [DATE] revealed she had a BIMS score of 14 indicating she was cognitively intact and able to make her needs known. Section G (Function Status) revealed she required extensive assistance with personal hygiene. Review of Resident #23's Care Plan dated 08/10/2022 revealed she was at risk for pressure ulcers and at risk for anemia. During an interview with Resident #23 on 09/22/2022 at 11:05 AM, she said TA K came one night to change her and told her we need to make love. She said she told him that was a very inappropriate statement. She said, he said she misunderstood him and changed her brief. She said he made her very uncomfortable, and she was lucky she only needed to be changed one time. She said her family member, Resident #32 (lives in same room) said he did not hear the conversation, but TA K goes down the hall and yells and was very loud. Resident #30 Review of Resident #30's undated face sheet revealed he was a [AGE] year-old-male admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of: Malignant neoplasm of bronchus or lung (Admission), anxiety disorder, Pain, and displaced fracture of surgical neck of left humerus. Review of Resident #30's MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS of 3 indicating he was severely cognitively impaired. Section G (Function Status) revealed he required extensive assistance for personal hygiene. During one-on-one interview with Resident #30 on 09/23/2022 3:00 PM, he stated he was familiar with TA K, and he worked the night shift. He stated he was uncomfortable around him and felt intimidated. He stated he would rather stay wet than ask him for help because you could tell it made TA K mad. He stated no one else made him feel that way. He stated TA K acted mad and smarted off to them when he took the smokers out to smoke. He stated he could not remember what he said but he knew TA K made him feel bad He could not remember a specific date or time. Review of Resident #7's undated face sheet revealed he was a [AGE] year-old-male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of: Chronic pain due to trauma, Anorexia nervosa, binge eating/purging type, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, Tachycardia, Gastro-esophageal reflux disease with esophagitis, Heart failure, disorder of thyroid, Vascular dementia with behavior disturbances. Review of Resident #7's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed he had a BIMS score of 15 indicating he was cognitively intact and able to make his needs known. Section G (Functional Section) revealed he required extensive assistance for personal hygiene. During an interview with Resident #7 on 09/22/2022 at 2:45 PM, he said he was always arguing with TA K because he always made a fuss about changing him. He said TA K called him a bitch and not being a man because Resident #7 needed someone to change him. (Resident #7 said no use to complaining because no one does anything about it. He said they (residents) complain about TA K, but nothing is done (Resident Council grievances) During an interview with the Administrator and DON on 09/22/2022 at 11:40 AM, they said they must find out what was going on. The Administrator said she found out TA K left one night and went home around 11:00 PM (disciplinary documentation stated date of incident 08/31/2022) and was missing for 5 hours. The Administrator said human resources (corporate) told Administrator and DON they had the options of terminating him or counsel him and allow him to return to work. She said we were given that options. The DON said the Aide who worked with him said he left for 5 hours and fell asleep at home. The Administrator said HR (human resources) told them it was clear cut reason to terminate him, but we were given the option of counseling him. The Administrator and DON stated they chose to allow him to return to work. Interview with the Activity Director on 09/22/2022 at 12:15 PM, said she was aware of the problems the residents who participates in the smoke breaks during the smoke breaks (#7, #8, #9 #35, and #38 and four more not willing to be identified) was having with TA (transition assistant) and has given the Resident Council minutes to the ADON (resident council minutes and grievances were reviewed by surveyor prior to the Resident Council meeting on 09/21/2022 at 10:15 AM) and they discuss the problem in the stand-up meetings. She said they counseled him and let him come back. She said she has no influence on who to hire or fire. She said, all I can do is make the Administrator know. During an interview with Resident #38 on 09/22/2022 at 12:35 PM, said the call lights will turn on and a light will come on outside the room, but the alarm will not come on. Resident #38 resides on the hall where TA K works. Resident #38 said because of the sexual abuse allegation TA K had to work on the North Hall. Resident #38 said because the call lights would not sound, he TA K could be threatening, yell at the resident slam doors and be abusive. Only 1 aide on South Hall and 1 nurse on the night shift were unaware of what was happening. Observation of Resident #38's Call light being turned on 09/22/2022 at 12:35 PM revealed the light outside of her room coming on but not audible sound coming on. Observation on 09/23/2022 at 9:30 AM alarm system was checked on the North Hall, in the center of the hall a switch could be turn off and on. Off the sound of the call light alarms was off and on the call light alarms could be heard. Resident #38 said because the call lights would not sound, he TA K could be threatening, yell at the resident slam doors and be abusive. During an interview with ADON on 09/22/2022 at 4:35 PM, she said she has never been given any of the grievances or Resident Council minutes by the Activities Director and has not been aware of residents being threatened. During an interview with the Administrator on 09/23/2022 at 10:40 AM, surveyor asked if she was aware of the complaints from the residents, that they were being threatened by TA K. She said this was the first time she heard about the complaints and never received any of the Resident Council Minutes or grievances. Administrator was told by the survey team. During interview with CNA I on 09/23/2022 at 3:00 PM, she said she was working the South Hall and noticed the call light panel going off for residents on the North Hall. She said TA K was only allowed to work the North Hall because of the allegations of sexual abuse alleged by Resident #35. She said she went to the North Hall and noticed several call lights on and took care of the residents. She said she then texted TA K and asked where he was, she said he wrote back and said he went home and fell asleep. She said he said he will be back. She said he did not come back till 5 in the morning. She said he threatened her if she told anyone. CNA I was unspecific about the threat but noticed someone was trying to vandalize her car the next night She called the Administrator who said not to take any more calls from him. Record review revealed inappropriate behavior dated 09/21/2022 at 6:00 AM ADON confronted TA K regarding his charting .he did not give a fuck about charting the point of care in the computer, and they would not be done. She said she asked him to discuss the matter with her and he said, he did not have to talk to her . The Administrator told ADON to write down this encounter for disciplinary action. Attempts to interview TA K was made on 09/23/2022 at 2:00 PM, Regional Operations Manager also attempted to call TA K at an undisclosed time on 09/23/2022 for an interview he said TA K hung up the telephone and would not speak to the Regional Operations Manager as told to surveyors. Attempts to interview Charge nurse on 09/23/2022 regarding TA K leaving the facility for 5 hours was made without success in returning telephone calls. During an interview with the Administrator 09/25/2022 at 2:30 PM, she said Resident #35 came to her and said TA K was telling us on smoke break we were all a bunch of liars, and he would preach about he was tight with God, and we were going to hell and Resident #35 was making up the sexual assault allegation. She said regarding the interview of CNA L, Administrator said because of the sexual abuse allegation there were not to be any discussions about what happened that was why she told her not to take any more calls from TA K. When asked by the surveyors what the Administrator thought about TA K calling the residents liars and preaching, she said she told TA K not to preach to the residents anymore. Administrator added TA K has been terminated , but not referred to the misconduct registry. Review of Email provided by Administrator to Human Resources dated 09/23/2022 at 8:10 AM confirmed termination of TA K. Review of the Grievances dated 08/28/2022 On 6:30 PM recorded by the Resident Council secretary revealed: during smoke break TA K informed everyone that we were only getting two cigarettes instead of three that we usually get for the last smoke break of the day. When asked why he said we complained about the showers not being given then we were to have our break cut short. Then asked if it was the nurses or the management, he said it was his decision and if we did not like it that we could go in and not go bother to come out for the next smoke break that he would be taking us out on. He told a group since he got in trouble that we were only getting two cigarettes instead of the three. He continues to push the issue about showers so that Resident #7 was the blame for only getting two cigarettes since he complained about the showers . TA K said he was taking us out of the kindness of his heart. TA K continued to argue with Resident #35 and said he was in charge and that what he says is final and if we don't like it, there is the door. It was brought to my attention as Resident Council Secretary by Resident Council President that Resident #35 said when TA K was giving her hugs, he was making a motion as if humping her. Review of the Grievances dated 09/06/2022 revealed the following: (Activities Director and Social Worker in attendance and emergency Resident Council meeting was called) Social Worker - 1. Recognizing and reviewing malicious grievances. Just because you don't like someone is not a reason for a grievance. But if they are threatening you or bullying you or touching you in appropriately or when told not to. This is malicious grievance and should be told to an employee and written up. Harassing is not tolerated in this facility. 2. Only the employees are to call and talk to resident family. No one is to have the phone number It has been brought to the attention that a resident has been calling other resident family unless it's the resident themselves or have the business to call other than the facility or the resident in question. It has been brought to the attention that a resident has been calling other resident family or guardian . Review of the Grievances dated 09/15/2022 recorded by the Resident Council secretary revealed the following: During the 6:30 PM smoke break. One of the aides said something about the one in purple (Resident #35) thinking it was her (related to sexual assault allegation) Things got heated Then TA K said that at this facility the residents have many real Big Liars Then he started in on a soap box sermon about him and God are like that! And that those liars were going to Hell. The residents here will be struck down. I (resident #38 Resident Council Secretary) Told the charge nurse and she said that the incident was reported to her. I did not know that all the situation was not reported. Review of the Grievances dated 09/21/2022 recorded by the Resident Council Secretary revealed the following: TA K split up the smokers into 2 groups sending out one group. TA K kept stating that the Administrator told him he had to take us out into groups instead of all at once. No one was told of this until we were on our way to the patio. TA K told Resident #8 he could not come outside because he did not have cigarettes. Resident #38 was awakened at 11:30 PM by a loud noise in her room TA K told me If you have any complaints about me (beating his chest) then keep your mouth shut. He then turned to my roommate and asked her if she called the Administrator and report me. She said No. Then he said your neighbor is doing that. Resident #35 asked to keep her door open, and TA K yelled and slammed the door shut time was 10:15 PM. During an interview with Administrator on 09/23/2022 at 4:40 PM she said TA K's only had abuse and neglect training completed with no other modules completed at the time of hire. Review of TA K's hire date provided by the facility was 08/16/2022. Record review of TA K's disciplinary action dated 08/31/2022 revealed the following: Final Warning- Time clock abuse - Not clocking out (5 hours left the building) contacting employees while investigation is ongoing - contacting and engaging with residents during investigation. Immediate termination if this problem occurs (Need) to follow command when leaving the building - clocking out when leaving the building - not reaching out to employees or residents when investigation is ongoing. Review of facility policy and procedure dated June 2021 titled, Abuse Prevention Program revealed the following: .2 Our residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation. This includes but is not limited to freedom from corporate punishment involuntary seclusion verbal mental sexual or physical abuses . 5. Our Center will not condone any form of resident abuse or neglect. To aid in abuse prevention, all personnel are to report any signs and symptoms of abuse/neglect to their supervisor and to the Abuse Prevention Coordinator immediately. 6. Our Center will protect residents from harm, reprisal, discriminating or coercion during investigations of abuse allegations. 7. All reports of resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property mistreatment and/or injuries of unknown source shall be promptly reported to local, state, and federal agencies and thoroughly investigated by the Center management. Findings of abuse investigation will also be reported. 8. Our Center will provide protection for the health, welfare and the rights of each resident residing in the Center to ensure the reporting of crimes.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0558 (Tag F0558)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to accommodate the needs and preferences of 5 of 26 sampl...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to accommodate the needs and preferences of 5 of 26 sampled residents (Residents #5, #30, #34, #8, and #4) reviewed for accommodation of needs. The facility failed to place call lights within reach for Residents #5, #30, and #34. The facility failed to place soap dispensers within reach in the communal bathrooms for Residents #8 and #4. The facility failed to provide space in the communal bathrooms to accommodate wheelchairs for Resident #8 and #4. These deficient practices could place residents at risk of their needs and preferences not being met and a decreased quality of life. Findings include: Resident #5 Review of Resident #5's Face Sheet, dated 09/23/22, revealed a [AGE] year-old male, admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included: Hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting unspecified side (admission Diagnosis), Parkinson's Disease, epileptic seizures related to external causes, aphasia, and need for assistance with personal care. Review of the Quarterly MDS for Resident #5 dated 06/28/22 reflected a BIMS score of 99 which indicated the resident was not able to complete the assessment. Resident #5 was assessed to require extensive assistance to complete ADLs. In an observation and interview during initial rounds, on 09/20/22 at 9:20 AM, Resident #5 was lying in bed. His call light was out of reach and lying on the floor. When asked if he could reach his call light, he said no. In an interview on 09/20/22 at 9:30 AM, CNA M said she was the only CNA on the hallway and had not got to him yet. In an interview on 09/20/22 at 9:35 AM, LVN C said CNA K was the only CNA on the hallway and she had not got to him yet. In an observation on 09/20/22 at 11:59 AM, Resident #5 call light was out of reach and was lying on the floor. In an observation on 09/20/22 at 4:04 PM, Resident #5's call light was out of reach and lying on the floor. Resident #30 Review of Resident #30's Face Sheet, dated 09/28/22, revealed a [AGE] year-old male, admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnosis was need for assistance with personal care. Review of the Quarterly MDS for Resident #30 dated 08/17/22, reflected a BIMS score of 03 (severe impairment). Resident #30 was assessed to require extensive assistance to complete ADLs. During an observation during initial rounds on 09/20/22 at 9:40 AM, Resident #30's call light out of reach and lying on the floor. Resident was not interviewable. Resident #34 Review of Resident #34's Face Sheet, dated 09/28/22, revealed a [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included: cerebral infarction due to thrombosis of left middle cerebral artery, hemiplegia unspecified affecting right dominant side, aphasia, dysphagia, and need for assistance with personal care. Review of the MDS for Resident #34 dated 08/27/22 reflected a BIMS was not able to be completed. Resident #34 was assessed to require extensive assistance and total dependence to complete ADLs. During an observation during initial rounds on 09/20/22 at 9:40 AM, Resident #34's call light out of reach and lying on the floor. Resident was not interviewable. During an observation on 09/20/22 at 4:06 PM, Resident #34's call light was not within reach and was lying on the floor. Resident was not interviewable. Resident #8 Review of Resident #8's Face Sheet, dated 09/24/22, revealed a [AGE] year-old female, admitted the facility on 09/28/18. Diagnoses include: systemic lupus erythematosus unspecified, unilateral primary osteoarthritis left knee, pain in left knee, pain in left ankle and joints of left foot, muscle weakness (generalized), and need for assistance with personal care. Review of the Annual MDS for Resident #8 dated 06/15/22 reflected a BIMS score of 12 (moderately impaired). Resident #8 was assessed to require supervision to complete ADLs. Resident #8 mobility was by wheelchair. In an observation and interview on 09/20/22 at 10:04 PM, Resident #8 said she had difficulty getting her wheelchair in the bathroom, in the north hallway, due to furniture (shower chair, shower bench, and table) being in the way. She said staff does not move the furniture out of way when they are done giving a resident a shower. Resident #8 said she cannot reach the soap dispenser due to it being too high as she cannot stand up. Resident #8 said she has complained about the furniture being in the way, but nothing is done about it. In an interview on 09/20/22 at 9:35 AM, LVN C she was not aware of the resident's having difficulty getting into the bathroom due to shower furniture being in the way or the soap dispensers being too high. Resident #4 Review of Resident #4's Face Sheet, dated 09/24/22, revealed a [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses include: Cerebral infarction unspecified (Admission), hemiplegia and hemiparesis following nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage affecting left non-dominant side, Parkinson's disease, and difficulty in walking. Review of the Quarterly MDS for Resident #4 dated 06/20/22 reflected a BIMS score of 15 (cognitively intact). Resident #4 was assessed to require supervision and limited assistance to complete ADLs. Resident #4 mobility is by wheelchair. In an observation and interview on 09/25/22 at 10:00 AM, Resident #4 was ambulating in a wheelchair. She was having difficulty getting her wheelchair in the communal bathroom in the North Hallway due to a shower chair, shower bench and table in the way as the shower area is connected to the toilet. Resident #4 said the bathroom is often like this and she has to try to move the furniture out of the way. She said there is usually no staff to help and does the best she can. Resident said she is not able to use soap to wash her hands due to the soap dispenser being too high as she is not able to stand up out of her wheelchair to reach it. In an interview on 09/25/22 at 1:50 pm, the DON said he was not aware of the soap dispensers being too high for residents in wheelchairs to reach them, but he would have them moved. He said the shower furniture is supposed to be moved out of the way when they are done giving a resident a bath. In an interview on 09/21/22 at 5:02 PM, the DON said it was his expectation for resident's call lights to be within reach and that lights not in reach could result in unmet needs for the resident. Record review of facility's policy Accommodation of Needs, (revised March 2021) revealed [in part] . Policy Statement Our facility's environment and staff behaviors are directed toward assisting the resident in maintaining and/or achieving safe independent functioning, dignity and well-being. Policy Interpretation and Implementation 1. The resident's individual needs and preferences are accommodated to the extent possible, except when the health and safety of the individual or other residents would be endangered. 2. The resident's individual needs and preferences, including the need for adaptive devices and modifications to the physical environment, are evaluated upon admission and reviewed on an ongoing basis. 3. In order to accommodate individual needs and preferences, adaptations may be made to the physical environment, including the resident's bedroom and bathroom, as well as the common areas in the facility.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0565 (Tag F0565)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to consider the views of a resident or family group and act promptly u...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to consider the views of a resident or family group and act promptly upon the grievances and recommendations of such groups for 6 of (14) who attended the Resident Council Meetings reviewed for grievance response said their grievances were not addressed. The facility failed to address grievances voiced in the resident council meeting held in 08/28/2022, 09/07/2022, 09/15/2022 and 09/21/2022, when the residents consistently voiced fear of retaliation, verbal abuse, and threats from staff member TA K. This failure could place residents at risk unresolved grievances, a decreased sense of self-worth, and a decline in quality of life due to potential physical harm and mental anguish. Findings Included: Resident #38 Record review of Resident #38's undated face sheet revealed she was a [AGE] year-old-female admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of necrotizing fasciitis (flesh eating bacteria), cellulitis of the lower limb, hypokalemia, abscess of the mouth, nausea vomiting, chronic diarrhea and pain in right toe. Record review of Resident #38's MDS re-admission dated 05/26/2022 revealed she had a BIMS (brief interview for memory status) of 15 indicating she was cognitively intact and able to make her needs known. Section G (functional status) revealed she required supervision for personal hygiene. Record review of Resident #38's Care Plan dated 05/22/2022 revealed she was at risk for falls, weight loss due to chronic diarrhea, and use of anti-depressant medication. Record review of Resident #38's physician orders dated 05/28/2022 initial orders revealed the following medications: Cymbalta 60 milligram (anti-depressant) 1 tablet a daily for depression. During initial tour of the facility on 09/20/22 at 9:35 AM, interview with Resident #38 asked the surveyor what she should do if a staff member threatened her for being a tattle tale. She said she would explain in further detail, but she was on her way to an outing with the activity director and fellow residents and would explain later. During an interview on 09/21/2022 at 8:00 AM, Resident #38 said TA K worked last night and told her that the state was in the building and that if she told on him (regarding the verbal abuse) it was going to be bad for her (threaten retribution) . She said it was an ongoing issue because of the problems he initially had with the smokers and the complaints against him regarding not giving showers and the allegation of being sexually inappropriate with Resident #35. She said she was afraid of him because of his behaviors, he yells at residents and slams doors and enter rooms without knocking. She said he worked last night (09/20/2022 6:00 PM to 09/21/2022 to 6:00 AM) and told her these things. She said she was told to sign the questionnaire when the thing with Resident #35 came up (sexual abuse allegation) did not feel comfortable with it. During an interview 09/21/2022 at 8:10 AM with Resident #38's roommate ( Resident #9) who participates in the smoking area was alert and oriented times three (aware of person place and time). said she witnessed TA K making threatening remarks when he came into their room during his shift ( 09/20/2022 6:00 PM to 09/21/2022 to 6:00 AM)(but in the morning-unsure of the exact time) and accused Resident #9 of telling on him (regarding to the showers, and verbal abuse) and when Resident #9 said she did not tell on him, he then accused Resident #38 and said he would get her (implying potential injury). During an interview on 09/22/2022 at 2:00 PM with Resident #38, while she was on the telephone with her mother, her mother told the surveyor she was aware of the threats Resident #38 was receiving from TA K and hoped the surveyor will help resolve the threats she was receiving him (from TA K). Resident #35 Record review of Resident #35's undated face sheet revealed she was a [AGE] year-old-female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of: hypertension, heart failure, thrombosis of other thoracic veins (blood clot in thoracic vein), Weakness, Other muscle spasm, and need for assistance with personal care. Review of Resident #35's annual MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #35 had a BIMS of 15 indicating she was cognitively intact and able to make her needs known. Section G (Functional Status) revealed she required extensive assistance with dressing, bathing, toilet use and hygiene with one person assistance. Review of Resident #35's Care Plan dated 08/21/2022 revealed resident had communication difficulty, at risk for pressure ulcers, utilize wheelchair for mobility, risk for falls and morbidly obese. Review of the facility's Incident Report dated 08/31/2022 revealed the following: Sexual assault allegation reported by resident (Resident #35) Resident stated male CNA (TA K) hugged her and made a humping movement rubbed his penis against her arms. Resident said she told male CNA (TA K) to stop. Male CNA (TA K) suspended until further notice pending investigation of allegation of sexual assault allegations . Authorities notified . Review of Police Report (undated report case #22-02928) revealed Assault checked of the form. Further investigation by the police unsubstantiated the allegation as well as HHSC investigator. During Resident Council meeting on 09/21/2022 at 10:15 AM, 14 residents attended, Resident #35 was the president of the council (preceding over the meeting). Residents 6 of (14) expressed grievances regarding TA K because he said he would only give out two cigarettes due to the residents complaining about him about showers. The said he told the residents on the smoke break he can do whatever he wanted to and when he gives out the cigarettes for the breaks even though three cigarettes were giving on other breaks. Several (4 on the north hall) residents said TA K would go up and down the hall and slam doors, yell at residents and just walk into rooms without knocking and especially when the ladies were dressing. Surveyor asked residents attending the Resident Council Meeting how many people were afraid of TA, 9 residents held up their hands including Resident #7, #,8, #23, #35 and #38 (4 others did not wish to be identified). Resident #8 Review of Resident #8's undated face sheet revealed she was a [AGE] year-old-female re-admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of: bipolar disorder, gout (excessive uric acid collected in joints), pain in ankle and foot, insomnia (difficulty sleeping). Review of Resident #8's last assessed MDS dated [DATE] revealed she had a BIMS score of 12 indicating she was moderately cognitively impaired but able to make her needs known. Section G (Function Status) revealed she needed set up and supervision with personal hygiene. Review of Resident #8's Care Plan dated 10/11/2018 revealed to participate in activities, risk for falls due to safety awareness, and chronic illness due to lupus (autoimmune syndrome). During interview on 09/22/2022 at 10:50 AM Resident #8 said, TA K would yell at the residents and would bump into them inappropriately hugging them. She said she was afraid of TA K; he had a habit of coming into women's room not knocking when he knew they were dressing. She said she was afraid of him because he was always threatening the residents in one way or another (unspecific regarding threats). She said she was told to sign the questionnaire (about Resident #35's sexual assault allegation and if they felt safe) and was uncomfortable about being identified. During an interview on 09/22/2022 at 2:20 PM with Resident #8's family member, (son) said she mentioned the inappropriate behavior TA K displayed (inappropriate hugging, yelling at residents, slamming doors making threatening comments) and he was in the process of getting her moved out. Resident #23 Review of Resident #23's undated face sheet revealed she was a [AGE] year-old-female re-admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of: Displaced fracture of base of neck of left femur, Overactive bladder, Pneumonia, abnormalities of gait and mobility. Review of Resident #23's Initial MDS dated [DATE] revealed she had a BIMS score of 14 indicating she was cognitively intact and able to make her needs known. Section G (Function Status) revealed she required extensive assistance with personal hygiene. Review of Resident #23's Care Plan dated 08/10/2022 revealed she was at risk for pressure ulcers and at risk for anemia. During an interview with Resident #23 on 09/22/2022 at 11:05 AM, she said TA K came one night to change her and told her we need to make love. She said she told him that was a very inappropriate question. She said, he said she misunderstood him and changed her brief. She said he made her very uncomfortable, and she was lucky she only needed to be changed one time. She said her family member, Resident #32 (lives in same room) said he did not hear the conversation, but TA K goes down the hall and yells and was very loud. Resident #30 Review of Resident #30's undated face sheet revealed he was a [AGE] year-old-male admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of: Malignant neoplasm of bronchus or lung (Admission), anxiety disorder, Pain, and displaced fracture of surgical neck of left humerus. Review of Resident #30's MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS of 3 indicating he was severely cognitively impaired. Section G (Function Status) revealed he required extensive assistance for personal hygiene. During one-on-one interview with Resident #30 on 09/23/2022 3:00 PM, he stated he was familiar with TA K, and he worked the night shift. He stated he was uncomfortable around him and felt intimidated. He stated he would rather stay wet than ask him for help because you could tell it made TA K mad. He stated no one else made him feel that way. He stated TA K acted mad and smarted off to them when he took the smokers out to smoke. He stated he could not remember what he said but he knew TA K made him feel bad He could not remember a specific date or time. Resident #7 Review of Resident #7's undated face sheet revealed he was a [AGE] year-old-male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of: Chronic pain due to trauma, Anorexia nervosa, binge eating/purging type, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, Tachycardia, Gastro-esophageal reflux disease with esophagitis, Heart failure, disorder of thyroid, Vascular dementia with behavior disturbances. Review of Resident #7's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed he had a BIMS score of 15 indicating he was cognitively intact and able to make his needs known. Section G (Functional Section) revealed he required extensive assistance for personal hygiene. During an interview with Resident #7 on 09/22/2022 at 2:45 PM, he said he was always arguing with TA K because he always made a fuss about changing him. He said he called him a bitch and not being a man because Resident #7 needed someone to change him. (Resident #7 said no use to complaining because no one does anything about it. He said they (residents) complain about TA K, but nothing is done (Resident Council grievances) During an interview with the Administrator and DON on 09/22/2022 at 11:40 AM, they said they must find out what was going on. The Administrator said she found out TA K left one night and went home around 11:00 PM (disciplinary documentation stated date of incident 08/31/2022) and was missing for 5 hours. The Administrator said human resources (corporate) told Administrator and DON they had the options of terminating him or counsel him and allow him to return to work. She said we were given that options. The DON said the Aide who worked with him said he left for 5 hours and fell asleep at home. The Administrator said HR (human resources) told them it was clear cut reason to terminate him, but we were given the option of counseling him. The Administrator and DON stated they chose to allow him to return to work. Interview with the Activity Director on 09/22/2022 at 12:15 PM, said she was aware of the problems the residents who participates in the smoke breaks during the smoke breaks (#7, #8, #9 #35, and #38 and four more not willing to be identified) was having with TA (transition assistant) and has given the Resident Council minutes to the ADON (resident council minutes and grievances were reviewed by surveyor prior to the Resident Council meeting on 09/21/2022 at 10:15 AM) and they discuss the problem in the stand-up meetings. She said they counseled him and let him come back. She said she has no influence on who to hire or fire. She said, all I can do is make the Administrator know. During an interview with Resident #38 on 09/22/2022 at 12:35 PM, said the call lights will turn on and a light will come on outside the room, but the alarm will not come on. Resident #38 resides on the hall where TA K works. Resident #38 said because the call lights would not sound, he TA K could be threatening, yell at the resident slam doors and be abusive. Only 1 aide on South Hall and 1 nurse on the night shift were unaware of what was happening. During an interview with Resident #38 on 09/22/2022 at 12:35 PM, she said the call lights will turn on and a light will come on outside the room, but the alarm will not come on. Resident #38 resides on the hall where TA K works. Resident #38 said because of the sexual abuse allegation TA K had to work on the North Hall the call lights would not sound he TA K could be threatening, yell at the resident slam doors and threaten them. Observation of Resident #38's Call light being turned on 09/22/2022 at 12:35 PM revealed the light outside of her room coming on but not audible sound coming on. Observation on 09/23/2022 at 9:30 AM alarm system was checked on the North Hall, in the center of the hall a switch could be turn off and on. Off the sound of the call light alarms was off and on the call light alarms could be heard. Resident #38 said because the call lights would not sound, he TA K could be threatening, yell at the resident slam doors and be abusive. During an interview with ADON on 09/22/2022 at 4:35 PM, she said she has never been given any of the grievances or Resident Council minutes by the Activities Director and has not been aware of residents being threatened. During an interview with the Administrator on 09/23/2022 at 10:40 AM, surveyor asked if she was aware of the complaints from the residents, that they were being threatened by TA K. She said this was the first time she heard about the complaints and never received any of the Resident Council Minutes or grievances. Administrator was told by the survey team. During interview with CNA I on 09/23/2022 at 3:00 PM, she said she was working the South Hall and noticed the call light panel going off for residents on the North Hall. She said TA K was only allowed to work the North Hall because of the allegations of sexual abuse alleged by Resident #35. She said she went to the North Hall and noticed several call lights on and took care of the residents. She said she then texted TA K and asked where he was, she said he wrote back and said he went home and fell asleep. She said he said he will be back. She said he did not come back till 5 in the morning. She said he threatened her if she told anyone. CNA I was unspecific about the threat but noticed someone was trying to vandalize her car the next night She called the Administrator who said not to take any more calls from him. Record review revealed inappropriate behavior dated 09/21/2022 at 6:00 AM ADON confronted TA K regarding his charting .he did not give a fuck about charting the point of care in the computer, and they would not be done. She said she asked him to discuss the matter with her and he said, he did not have to talk to her . The Administrator told ADON to write down this encounter for disciplinary action. Attempts to interview TA K was made on 09/23/2022 at 2:00 PM, Regional Operations Manager also attempted to call TA K at an undisclosed time on 09/23/2022 for an interview he said TA K hung up the telephone and would not speak to the Regional Operations Manager as told to surveyors. Attempts to interview Charge nurse on 09/23/2022 regarding TA K leaving the facility for 5 hours was made without success in returning telephone calls. During an interview with the Administrator 09/25/2022 at 2:30 PM, she said Resident #35 came to her and said TA K was telling us on smoke break we were all a bunch of liars, and he would preach about he was tight with God, and we were going to hell and Resident #35 was making up the sexual assault allegation. She said regarding the interview of CNA L, Administrator said because of the sexual abuse allegation there were not to be any discussions about what happened that was why she told her not to take any more calls from TA K. When asked by the surveyors what the Administrator thought about TA K calling the residents liars and preaching, she said she told TA K not to preach to the residents anymore. Administrator added TA K has been terminated. Review of Email provided by Administrator to Human Resources dated 09/23/2022 at 8:10 AM confirmed termination of TA K. Review of the Grievances dated 08/28/2022 On 6:30 PM recorded by the Resident Council secretary revealed: during smoke break TA K informed everyone that we were only getting two cigarettes instead of three that we usually get for the last smoke break of the day. When asked why he said we complained about the showers not being given then we were to have our break cut short. Then asked if it was the nurses or the management, he said it was his decision and if we did not like it that we could go in and not go bother to come out for the next smoke break that he would be taking us out on. He told a group since he got in trouble that we were only getting two cigarettes instead of the three. He continues to push the issue about showers so that Resident #7 was the blame for only getting two cigarettes since he complained about the showers . TA K said he was taking us out of the kindness of his heart. TA K continued to argue with Resident #35 and said he was in charge and that what he says is final and if we don't like it, there is the door. It was brought to my attention as Resident Council Secretary by Resident Council President that Resident #35 said when TA K was giving her hugs, he was making a motion as if humping her. Review of the Grievances dated 09/06/2022 revealed the following: (Activities Director and Social Worker in attendance and emergency Resident Council meeting was called) Social Worker - 5. Recognizing and reviewing malicious grievances. Just because you don't like someone is not a reason for a grievance. But if they are threatening you or bullying you or touching you in appropriately or when told not to. This is malicious grievance and should be told to an employee and written up. Harassing is not tolerated in this facility. 6. Only the employees are to call and talk to resident family. No one is to have the phone number It has been brought to the attention that a resident has been calling other resident family unless it's the resident themselves or have the business to call other than the facility or the resident in question. It has been brought to the attention that a resident has been calling other resident family or guardian . Review of the Grievances dated 09/15/2022 recorded by the Resident Council secretary revealed the following: During the 6:30 PM smoke break. One of the aides said something about the one in purple (Resident #35) thinking it was her (related to sexual assault allegation) Things got heated Then TA K said that at this facility the residents have many real Big Liars Then he started in on a soap box sermon about him and God are like that! And that those liars were going to Hell. The residents here will be struck down. I (resident #38 Resident Council Secretary) Told the charge nurse and she said that the incident was reported to her. I did not know that all the situation was not reported. Review of the Grievances dated 09/21/2022 recorded by the R revealed the following: TA K split up the smokers into 2 groups sending out one group. TA K kept stating that the Administrator told him he had to take us out into groups instead of all at once. No one was told of this until we were on our way to the patio. TA K told Resident #8 he could not come outside because he did not have cigarettes. Resident #38 was awakened at 11:30 PM by a loud noise in her room TA K told me If you have any complaints about me (beating his chest) then keep your mouth shut. He then turned to my roommate and asked her if she called the Administrator and report me. She said No. Then he said your neighbor is doing that. Resident #35 asked to keep her door open, and TA K yelled and slammed the door shut time was 10:15 PM During an interview with Administrator on 09/23/2022 at 4:40 PM she said TA K's only had abuse and neglect training completed with no other modules completed at the time of hire. Review of TA K's hire date provided by the facility was 08/16/2022. Record review of TA K's disciplinary action dated 08/31/2022 revealed the following: Final Warning- Time clock abuse - Not clocking out (5 hours left the building) contacting employees while investigation is ongoing - contacting and engaging with residents during investigation. Immediate termination if this problem occurs. (Need) to follow command when leaving the building - clocking out when leaving the building - not reaching out to employees or residents when investigation is ongoing. Review of facility policy and procedure dated June 2021 titled, Abuse Prevention Program revealed the following [in part]: .2 Our residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation. The includes but is not limited to freedom from corporate punishment involuntary seclusion verbal mental sexual or physical abuses . 5. Our Center will not condone any form of resident abuse or neglect. To aid in abuse prevention, all personnel are to report any signs and symptoms of abuse/neglect to their supervisor and to the Abuse Prevention Coordinator immediately. 6. Our Center will protect residents from harm, reprisal, discriminating or coercion during investigations of abuse allegations. 7. All reports of resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property mistreatment and/or injuries of unknown source shall be promptly reported to local, state, and federal agencies and thoroughly investigated by the Center management. Findings of abuse investigation will also be reported. 8. Our Center will provide protection for the health, welfare and the rights of each resident residing in the Center to ensure the reporting of crimes. Review of facility policy and procedure, revised April 2107, titled Grievances/Complaints, Filing revelaed the following [in part] . Policy Statement: Residents and their representatives have the right to file grievances, either orally or in writing, to the facility staff or to the agency designated to hear grievances (e.g., the State Ombudsman). The Administrator and staff will make prompt efforts to resolve grievances to the satisfaction of the resident and/or representative. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 1. Any resident, family member, or appointed resident representative may file a grievance or complaint concerning care, treatment, behavior of other residents, staff members, theft of property, or any other concerns regarding his or her stay at the facility. Grievances also may be voiced or filed regarding care that has not been furnished. 2. Residents, family and resident representatives have the right to voice or file grievances without discrimi-nation or reprisal in any form, and without fear of discrimination or reprisal. 3. All grievances, complaints or recommendations stemming from resident or family groups concerning is-sues of resident care in the facility will be considered. Actions on such issues will be responded to in writing, including a rationale for the response. 5. Grievances and/or complaints may be submitted orally or in writing, and may be filed anonymously. 8. Upon receipt of a grievance and/or complaint, the Grievance Officer will review and investigate the [NAME]-gations and submit a written report of such findings to the Administrator within five (5) working days of receiving the grievance and/or complaint. 9. The Grievance Officer will coordinate actions with the appropriate state and federal agencies, depending on the nature of the allegations. All alleged violations of neglect, abuse and/or misappropriation of property will be reported and investigated under guidelines for reporting abuse, neglect and misappropriation of property, as per state law. 10. The Grievance Officer, Administrator and Staff will take immediate action to prevent further potential vi-olations of resident rights while the alleged violation is being investigated. 11. The Administrator will review the findings with Grievance Officer to determine what corrective actions, if any, need to be taken. 12. The resident, or person filing the grievance and/or complaint on behalf of the resident, will be informed (verbally and in writing) of the findings of the investigation and the actions that will be taken to correct any identified problems. The Administrator, or his or her designee, will make such reports orally within _____ working days of the filing of the grievance or complaint with the facility. A written summary of the investigation will also be provided to the resident, and a copy will be filed in the business office. 13. If the grievance was filed anonymously, the Grievance Officer will inform the resident that a grievance has been anonymously filed on his or her behalf and the steps that will be taken to investigate the grievance(s) and report the findings. The Grievance Officer will reiterate to the resident that it is against facility policy and federal regulations to discriminate or sanction a resident who has filed or verbalized a complaint against the facility, and that his or her rights to be free of discrimination or reprisal will be protected. Review of facility policy and procedure, revised February 2021, titled, Resident Council revealed the following [in part]: Policy Statement: The facility supports residents ' rights to organize and participate in the resident council. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 1. The purpose of the resident council is to provide a forum for: residents, families and resident representatives to have input in the operation of the facility; discussion of concerns and suggestions for improvement; consensus building and communication between residents and facility staff; and disseminating information and gathering feedback from interested residents. 2. All residents are eligible to participate in the resident council. The facility staff encourages residents who are willing to participate. Staff, visitors, or other guests may attend resident council meetings if invited by the respective resident group. 3. The resident council group is provided with space, privacy and support to conduct meetings. 4. The council is encouraged to elect a president or chair to act as a liaison and facilitate communication between the council and a designated staff person who has been approved by the council. 5. Council meetings are scheduled monthly or more frequently if requested by residents. The date, time and location of the meetings are noted in the activities calendar. 6. A Resident Council Response Form will be utilized to track issues and their resolution. The facility department related to any issues will be responsible for addressing the item(s) of concern. 7. The quality assurance and performance improvement (QAPI) committee will review information and feedback from the resident council as part of their quality review. Issues documented on council response forms may be referred to the QAPI committee, if applicable (i.e., the issue is of serious nature or if there is a pattern, etc.).
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0574 (Tag F0574)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to post Resident Council Meeting minutes and Grievances or...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to post Resident Council Meeting minutes and Grievances or provide to Abuse Coordinator allegations of abuse and neglect for 1of 1 staff (the AD) reviewed for GRIEVANCES.*. The facility did not provide the Abuse Coordinator with allegations of Abuse and Neglect during the Resident Council Minutes or Grievances. These failures placed the residents at an unsafe environment exposing them to the risk of abuse, neglect, mental anguish along with the potential of physical abuse and death. The findings include: Record review of Resident #38's undated face sheet revealed she was a [AGE] year-old-female admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of necrotizing fasciitis (flesh eating bacteria), cellulitis of the lower limb, hypokalemia, abscess of the mouth, nausea vomiting, chronic diarrhea and pain in right toe. Record review of Resident #38's MDS re-admission dated 05/26/2022 revealed she had a BIMS (brief interview for memory status) of 15 indicating she was cognitively intact and able to make her needs known. Section G (functional status) revealed she required supervision for personal hygiene. Record review of Resident #38's Care Plan dated 05/22/2022 revealed she was at risk for falls, weight loss due to chronic diarrhea, and use of anti-depressant medication. Record review of Resident #38's physician orders dated 05/28/2022 initial orders revealed the following medications: Cymbalta 60 milligram (anti-depressant) 1 tablet a daily for depression. During initial tour of the facility on 09/20/22 at 9:35 AM, interview with Resident #38 asked the surveyor what she should do if a staff member threatened her for being a tattle tale. She said she would explain in further detail, but she was on her way to an outing with the activity director and fellow residents and would explain later. During an interview on 09/21/2022 at 8:00 AM, Resident #38 said TA K worked last night and told her that the state was in the building and that if she told on him (regarding the verbal abuse) it was going to be bad for her (threaten retribution) . She said it was an ongoing issue because of the problems he initially had with the smokers and the complaints against him regarding not giving showers and the allegation of being sexually inappropriate with Resident #35. She said she was afraid of him because of his behaviors, he yells at residents and slams doors and enter rooms without knocking. She said he worked last night (09/20/2022 6:00 PM to 09/21/2022 to 6:00 AM) and told her these things. She said she was told to sign the questionnaire when the thing with Resident #35 came up (sexual abuse allegation) did not feel comfortable with it. During an interview 09/21/2022 at 8:10 AM with Resident #38's roommate ( Resident #9) who participates in the smoking area was alert and oriented times three (aware of person place and time). said she witnessed TA K making threatening remarks when he came into their room during his shift ( 09/20/2022 6:00 PM to 09/21/2022 to 6:00 AM)(but in the morning-unsure of the exact time) and accused Resident #9 of telling on him (regarding to the showers, and verbal abuse) and when Resident #9 said she did not tell on him, he then accused Resident #38 and said he would get her (implying potential injury). During an interview on 09/22/2022 at 2:00 PM with Resident #38, while she was on the telephone with her mother, her mother told the surveyor she was aware of the threats Resident #38 was receiving from TA K and hoped the surveyor will help resolve the threats she was receiving him (from TA K). Record review of Resident #35's undated face sheet revealed she was a [AGE] year-old-female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of: hypertension, heart failure, thrombosis of other thoracic veins (blood clot in thoracic vein), Weakness, Other muscle spasm, and need for assistance with personal care. Review of Resident #35's annual MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #35 had a BIMS of 15 indicating she was cognitively intact and able to make her needs known. Section G (Functional Status) revealed she required extensive assistance with dressing, bathing, toilet use and hygiene with one person assistance. Review of Resident #35's Care Plan dated 08/21/2022 revealed resident had communication difficulty, at risk for pressure ulcers, utilize wheelchair for mobility, risk for falls and morbidly obese. Review of the facility's Incident Report dated 08/31/2022 revealed the following: Sexual assault allegation reported by resident (Resident #35) Resident stated male CNA (TA K) hugged her and made a humping movement rubbed his penis against her arms. Resident said she told male CNA (TA K) to stop. Male CNA (TA K) suspended until further notice pending investigation of allegation of sexual assault allegations . Authorities notified . Review of Police Report (undated report case #22-02928) revealed Assault checked of the form. Further investigation by the police unsubstantiated the allegation as well as DHS investigator. During Resident Council meeting on 09/21/2022 at 10:15 AM, 14 residents attended, Resident #35 was the president of the council (preceding over the meeting). Residents 6 of (14) expressed grievances regarding TA K because he said he would only give out two cigarettes due to the residents complaining about him about showers. The said he told the residents on the smoke break he can do whatever he wanted to and when he gives out the cigarettes for the breaks even though three cigarettes were giving on other breaks. Several (4 on the north hall) residents said TA K would go up and down the hall and slam doors, yell at residents and just walk into rooms without knocking and especially when the ladies were dressing. Surveyor asked residents attending the Resident Council Meeting how many people were afraid of TA, 9 residents held up their hands including Resident #7, #,8, #23, #35 and #38 (4 others did not wish to be identified). Review of Resident #8's undated face sheet revealed she was a [AGE] year-old-female re-admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of: bipolar disorder, gout (excessive uric acid collected in joints), pain in ankle and foot, insomnia (difficulty sleeping). Review of Resident #8's last assessed MDS dated [DATE] revealed she had a BIMS score of 12 indicating she was moderately cognitively impaired but able to make her needs known. Section G (Function Status) revealed she needed set up and supervision with personal hygiene. Review of Resident #8's Care Plan dated 10/11/2018 revealed to participate in activities, risk for falls due to safety awareness, and chronic illness due to lupus (autoimmune syndrome). During interview on 09/22/2022 at 10:50 AM Resident #8 said, TA K would yell at the residents and would bump into them inappropriately hugging them. She said she was afraid of TA K, he had a habit of coming into women's room not knocking when he knew they were dressing. She said she was afraid of him because he was always threatening the residents in one way or another (unspecific regarding threats). She said she was told to sign the questionnaire (about Resident #35's sexual assault allegation and if they felt safe) and was uncomfortable about being identified. During an interview on 09/22/2022 at 2:20 PM with Resident #8's family member, (son) said she mentioned the inappropriate behavior TA K displayed (inappropriate hugging, yelling at residents, slamming doors making threatening comments) and he was in the process of getting her moved out. Review of Resident #23's undated face sheet revealed she was a [AGE] year-old-female re-admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of: Displaced fracture of base of neck of left femur, Overactive bladder, Pneumonia, abnormalities of gait and mobility. Review of Resident #23's Initial MDS dated [DATE] revealed she had a BIMS score of 14 indicating she was cognitively intact and able to make her needs known. Section G (Function Status) revealed she required extensive assistance with personal hygiene. Review of Resident #23's Care Plan dated 08/10/2022 revealed she was at risk for pressure ulcers and at risk for anemia. During an interview with Resident #23 on 09/22/2022 at 11:05 AM, she said TA K came one night to change her and told her we need to make love. She said she told him that was a very inappropriate question. She said, he said she misunderstood him and changed her brief. She said he made her very uncomfortable, and she was lucky she only needed to be changed one time. She said her family member, Resident #32 (lives in same room) said he did not hear the conversation, but TA K goes down the hall and yells and was very loud. Resident #30 Review of Resident #30's undated face sheet revealed he was a [AGE] year-old-male admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of: Malignant neoplasm of bronchus or lung (Admission), anxiety disorder, Pain, and displaced fracture of surgical neck of left humerus. Review of Resident #30's MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS of 3 indicating he was severely cognitively impaired. Section G (Function Status) revealed he required extensive assistance for personal hygiene. During one-on-one interview with Resident #30 on 09/23/2022 3:00 PM, he stated he was familiar with TA K, and he worked the night shift. He stated he was uncomfortable around him and felt intimidated. He stated he would rather stay wet than ask him for help because you could tell it made TA K mad. He stated no one else made him feel that way. He stated TA K acted mad and smarted off to them when he took the smokers out to smoke. He stated he could not remember what he said but he knew TA K made him feel bad He could not remember a specific date or time. Review of Resident #7's undated face sheet revealed he was a [AGE] year-old-male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of: Chronic pain due to trauma, Anorexia nervosa, binge eating/purging type, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, Tachycardia, Gastro-esophageal reflux disease with esophagitis, Heart failure, disorder of thyroid, Vascular dementia with behavior disturbances. Review of Resident #7's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed he had a BIMS score of 15 indicating he was cognitively intact and able to make his needs known. Section G (Functional Section) revealed he required extensive assistance for personal hygiene. During an interview with Resident #7 on 09/22/2022 at 2:45 PM, he said he was always arguing with TA K because he always made a fuss about changing him. He said he called him a bitch and not being a man because Resident #7 needed someone to change him. (Resident #7 said no use to complaining because no one does anything about it. He said they (residents) complain about TA K, but nothing is done (Resident Council grievances) During an interview with the Administrator and DON on 09/22/2022 at 11:40 AM, they said they must find out what was going on. The Administrator said she found out TA K left one night and went home around 11:00 PM (disciplinary documentation stated date of incident 08/31/2022) and was missing for 5 hours. The Administrator said human resources (corporate) told Administrator and DON they had the options of terminating him or counsel him and allow him to return to work. She said we were given that options. The DON said the Aide who worked with him said he left for 5 hours and fell asleep at home. The Administrator said HR (human resources) told them it was clear cut reason to terminate him, but we were given the option of counseling him. The Administrator and DON stated they chose to allow him to return to work. Interview with the Activity Director on 09/22/2022 at 12:15 PM, said she was aware of the problems the residents who participates in the smoke breaks during the smoke breaks (#7, #8, #9 #35, and #38 and four more not willing to be identified) was having with TA (transition assistant) and has given the Resident Council minutes to the ADON (resident council minutes and grievances were reviewed by surveyor prior to the Resident Council meeting on 09/21/2022 at 10:15 AM) and they discuss the problem in the stand-up meetings. She said they counseled him and let him come back. She said she has no influence on who to hire or fire. She said, all I can do is make the Administrator know. During an interview with Resident #38 on 09/22/2022 at 12:35 PM, said the call lights will turn on and a light will come on outside the room, but the alarm will not come on. Resident #38 resides on the hall where TA K works. Resident #38 said because the call lights would not sound, he TA K could be threatening, yell at the resident slam doors and be abusive. Only 1 aide on South Hall and 1 nurse on the night shift were unaware of what was happening. During an interview with Resident #38 on 09/22/2022 at 12:35 PM, she said the call lights will turn on and a light will come on outside the room, but the alarm will not come on. Resident #38 resides on the hall where TA K works. Resident #38 said because of the sexual abuse allegation TA K had to work on the North Hall the call lights would not sound he TA K could be threatening, yell at the resident slam doors and threaten them. Observation of Resident #38's Call light being turned on 09/22/2022 at 12:35 PM revealed the light outside of her room coming on but not audible sound coming on. Observation on 09/23/2022 at 9:30 AM alarm system was checked on the North Hall, in the center of the hall a switch could be turn off and on. Off the sound of the call light alarms was off and on the call light alarms could be heard. Resident #38 said because the call lights would not sound, he TA K could be threatening, yell at the resident slam doors and be abusive. During an interview with ADON on 09/22/2022 at 4:35 PM, she said she has never been given any of the grievances or Resident Council minutes by the Activities Director and has not been aware of residents being threatened. During an interview with the Administrator on 09/23/2022 at 10:40 AM, surveyor asked if she was aware of the complaints from the residents, that they were being threatened by TA K. She said this was the first time she heard about the complaints and never received any of the Resident Council Minutes or grievances. Administrator was told by the survey team. During interview with CNA I on 09/23/2022 at 3:00 PM, she said she was working the South Hall and noticed the call light panel going off for residents on the North Hall. She said TA K was only allowed to work the North Hall because of the allegations of sexual abuse alleged by Resident #35. She said she went to the North Hall and noticed several call lights on and took care of the residents. She said she then texted TA K and asked where he was, she said he wrote back and said he went home and fell asleep. She said he said he will be back. She said he did not come back till 5 in the morning. She said he threatened her if she told anyone. CNA I was unspecific about the threat but noticed someone was trying to vandalize her car the next night She called the Administrator who said not to take any more calls from him. Record review revealed inappropriate behavior dated 09/21/2022 at 6:00 AM ADON confronted TA K regarding his charting .he did not give a fuck about charting the point of care in the computer, and they would not be done. She said she asked him to discuss the matter with her and he said, he did not have to talk to her . The Administrator told ADON to write down this encounter for disciplinary action. Attempts to interview TA K was made on 09/23/2022 at 2:00 PM, Regional Operations Manager also attempted to call TA K at an undisclosed time on 09/23/2022 for an interview he said TA K hung up the telephone and would not speak to the Regional Operations Manager as told to surveyors. Attempts to interview Charge nurse on 09/23/2022 regarding TA K leaving the facility for 5 hours was made without success in returning telephone calls. During an interview with the Administrator 09/25/2022 at 2:30 PM, she said Resident #35 came to her and said TA K was telling us on smoke break we were all a bunch of liars, and he would preach about he was tight with God, and we were going to hell and Resident #35 was making up the sexual assault allegation. She said regarding the interview of CNA L, Administrator said because of the sexual abuse allegation there were not to be any discussions about what happened that was why she told her not to take any more calls from TA K. When asked by the surveyors what the Administrator thought about TA K calling the residents liars and preaching, she said she told TA K not to preach to the residents anymore. Administrator added TA K has been terminated. Review of Email provided by Administrator to Human Resources dated 09/23/2022 at 8:10 AM confirmed termination of TA K. Review of the Grievances dated 08/28/2022 On 6:30 PM recorded by the Resident Council secretary revealed: during smoke break TA K informed everyone that we were only getting two cigarettes instead of three that we usually get for the last smoke break of the day. When asked why he said we complained about the showers not being given then we were to have our break cut short. Then asked if it was the nurses or the management, he said it was his decision and if we did not like it that we could go in and not go bother to come out for the next smoke break that he would be taking us out on. He told a group since he got in trouble that we were only getting two cigarettes instead of the three. He continues to push the issue about showers so that Resident #7 was the blame for only getting two cigarettes since he complained about the showers . TA K said he was taking us out of the kindness of his heart. TA K continued to argue with Resident #35 and said he was in charge and that what he says is final and if we don't like it, there is the door. It was brought to my attention as Resident Council Secretary by Resident Council President that Resident #35 said when TA K was giving her hugs, he was making a motion as if humping her. Review of the Grievances dated 09/06/2022 revealed the following: (Activities Director and Social Worker in attendance and emergency Resident Council meeting was called) Social Worker - 7. Recognizing and reviewing malicious grievances. Just because you don't like someone is not a reason for a grievance. But if they are threatening you or bullying you or touching you in appropriately or when told not to. This is malicious grievance and should be told to an employee and written up. Harassing is not tolerated in this facility. 8. Only the employees are to call and talk to resident family. No one is to have the phone number It has been brought to the attention that a resident has been calling other resident family unless it's the resident themselves or have the business to call other than the facility or the resident in question. It has been brought to the attention that a resident has been calling other resident family or guardian . Review of the Grievances dated 09/15/2022 recorded by the Resident Council secretary revealed the following: During the 6:30 PM smoke break. One of the aides said something about the one in purple (Resident #35) thinking it was her (related to sexual assault allegation) Things got heated Then TA K said that at this facility tthe residents have many real Big Liars Then he started in on a soap box sermon about him and God are like that! And that those liars were going to Hell. The residents here will be struck down. I (resident #38 Resident Council Secretary) Told the charge nurse and she said that the incident was reported to her. I did not know that all the situation was not reported. Review of the Grievances dated 09/21/2022 recorded by the R revealed the following: TA K split up the smokers into 2 groups sending out one group. TA K kept stating that the Administrator told him he had to take us out into groups instead of all at once. No one was told of this until we were on our way to the patio. TA K told Resident #8 he could not come outside because he did not have cigarettes. Resident #38 was awakened at 11:30 PM by a loud noise in her room TA K told me If you have any complaints about me (beating his chest) then keep your mouth shut. He then turned to my roommate and asked her if she called the Administrator and report me. She said No. Then he said your neighbor is doing that. Resident #35 asked to keep her door open, and TA K yelled and slammed the door shut time was 10:15 PM During an interview with Administrator on 09/23/2022 at 4:40 PM she said TA K's only had abuse and neglect training completed with no other modules completed at the time of hire. Review of TA K's hire date provided by the facility was 08/16/2022. Record review of TA K's disciplinary action dated 08/31/2022 revealed the following: Final Warning- Time clock abuse - Not clocking out (5 hours left the building) contacting employees while investigation is ongoing - contacting and engaging with residents during investigation. Immediate termination if this problem occurs (Need) to follow command when leaving the building - clocking out when leaving the building - not reaching out to employees or residents when investigation is ongoing. Review of facility policy and procedure dated June 2021 titled, Abuse Prevention Program revealed the following: .2 Our residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation. The includes but is not limited to freedom from corporate punishment involuntary seclusion verbal mental sexual or physical abuses . 5. Our Center will not condone any form of resident abuse or neglect. To aid in abuse prevention, all personnel are to report any signs and symptoms of abuse/neglect to their supervisor and to the Abuse Prevention Coordinator immediately. 6. Our Center will protect residents from harm, reprisal, discriminating or coercion during investigations of abuse allegations. 7. All reports of resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property mistreatment and/or injuries of unknown source shall be promptly reported to local, state, and federal agencies and thoroughly investigated by the Center management. Findings of abuse investigation will also be reported. 8. Our Center will provide protection for the health, welfare and the rights of each resident residing in the Center to ensure the reporting of crimes.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0584)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

F584 / N1337 / N1338 - Clean, Comfortable, Homelike Environment Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain a clean, sanitary, comfortable, and homelike environm...

Read full inspector narrative →
F584 / N1337 / N1338 - Clean, Comfortable, Homelike Environment Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain a clean, sanitary, comfortable, and homelike environment for 2 of 2 hallways (North and South ) and 2 of 4 bathrooms ( North And B and South A and B) observed for environment as evidence by: A. The 2 hallways( North and South) in the facility had a strong odor of urine. B. 2 of 4 communal bathrooms were dirty with feces. This failure could place residents at risk for a diminished quality of life and a diminished clean, homelike environment. Findings include: In an observation on 09/20/22 at 9:00 AM, during entrance to the facility, 2 of 2 resident hallways had a strong smell of urine that permeated to all the resident rooms. In an observation on 09/20/22 at 9:30 AM, during initial rounds, the communal bathroom on the north hallway had a dirty rag with feces on it lying in the shower area. In an interview on 09/20/22 at 11:20 AM, the Housekeeping and Laundry Supervisor stated we clean the bathrooms when the CNAs come and ask us other than that the CNAs keep a spray bottle of disinfectant locked in the shower room. Observation on 9/22/22 at 12:35 revealed there was no disinfectant in the bathroom. In an interview on 09/20/22 at 3:25 PM, Resident #8 who was ambulating in the hallway in a wheelchair said the bathrooms are always dirty and sometimes she must wipe feces off the toilet before she can use it. In an observation on 09/21/22 at 5:44 AM, the 2 resident's hallways had a strong smell of urine that permeated to all the resident rooms. In an Interview on 09/22/22 at 12:30 PM, TA O said they were not allowed to have chemicals to clean the bathroom. In an interview, on 09/22/22 at 12:35 PM, CNA N said we are not allowed to have chemicals to clean the bathroom. In an observation and interview, on 09/24/22 at 10:30 AM, the Regional [NAME] President was shown a communal bathroom in the north hallway. The bathroom had a foul odor, the toilet seat was soiled with feces, and flies were flying around. He was asked to describe the smell, he said this was an old building and it has a musty smell. He did not acknowledge that he could smell urine. He said the building belongs to the Administrator. The Administrator was not available for interview. In an interview on 09/25/22 at 1:50 PM, the DON said there was a battle between nursing and housekeeping. Housekeeping does not clean the toilets if soiled. If a CNA sees a dirty toilet or told there was a dirty toilet, they are supposed to clean it. The DON said he had made corporate aware of the situation. Record Review of Resident Council minutes, dated 08/26/22, revealed under the heading of Old Business - Bathrooms are still uncleaned and unavailable. The response of the Administrator and Activity Director, who were in attendance, was if the problems continue find someone to clean them. Record Review of the facility's policy, Homelike Environment, revised February 2021, revealed the following [in part] . Policy Statement Residents are provided with a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment and encouraged to use their personal belongings to the extent possible. Policy Interpretation and Implementation 1. Staff provides person-centered care that emphasizes the residents' comfort, independence and personal needs and preferences. 2. The facility staff and management maximize, to the extent possible, the characteristics of the facility that reflect a personalized, homelike setting. These characteristics include: a. clean, sanitary and orderly environment. f. pleasant, neutral scents.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Grievances (Tag F0585)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure prompt efforts to resolve grievances for 6 of 1...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure prompt efforts to resolve grievances for 6 of 14 (Resident #28, #35, #8, #30, #23, #7) residents reviewed for resident rights. The facility did not promptly resolve multiple grievances for Resident #38, #35, #8, #30, #23, and #7 that included quality of care, resident rights and staff treatment towards residents. This failure placed residents at risk of unresolved grievances, and at risk for a decreased quality of life. Findings included: Resident #38 Record review of Resident #38's undated face sheet revealed she was a [AGE] year-old-female admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of necrotizing fasciitis (flesh eating bacteria), cellulitis of the lower limb, hypokalemia, abscess of the mouth, nausea vomiting, chronic diarrhea and pain in right toe. Record review of Resident #38's MDS (minimum data set) re-admission dated 05/26/2022 revealed she had a BIMS (brief interview for memory status) of 15 indicating she was cognitively intact and able to make her needs known. Section G (functional status) revealed she required supervision for personal hygiene. Record review of Resident #38's Care Plan dated 05/22/2022 revealed she was at risk for falls, weight loss due to chronic diarrhea, and use of anti-depressant medication. During an interview with Resident #38 on 09/22/2022 at 12:35 PM she said when she press her call light, a light will come one outside of the doorway of her room but there is no audible alarm. Resident #35 Record review of Resident #35 undated face sheet revealed she was a [AGE] year-old-female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of: hypertension, heart failure, thrombosis of other thoracic veins (blood clot in thoracic vein), Weakness, Other muscle spasm, and need for assistance with personal care. Review of Resident #35's annual MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #35 had a BIMS of 15 indicating she was cognitively intact and able to make her needs known. Section G (Functional Status) revealed she required extensive assistance with dressing, bathing, toilet use and hygiene with one person assistance Review of Resident #35's Care Plan dated 08/21/2022 resident has communication difficulty, at risk for pressure ulcers, utilize wheelchair for mobility, risk for falls and morbidly obese. Interview with Resident #35 on 09/20/2022 at 4:00 PM said she would discuss grievances at the Resident Council meeting since she was the present out going Resident Council President and aware the Resident Council meeting would be on 09/21/2022 at 10:15 AM. Resident #8 Review of Resident #8 undated face sheet revealed she was a [AGE] year-old-female re-admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of: bipolar disorder, gout (excessive uric acid collected in joints), pain in ankle and foot, insomnia (difficulty sleeping). Review of Resident #8's last assessed MDS dated [DATE] revealed she had a BIMS score of 12 indicating she is moderately cognitively impaired but able to make her needs known. Section G (Function Status) revealed she needs set up and supervision with personal hygiene. Review of Resident #8's Care Plan 10/11/2018 reveal to participate in activities, risk for falls due to safety awareness, and chronic illness due to lupus (autoimmune syndrome). During an interview on 09/22/2022 at 10:50 AM, Resident #8 said TA K would yell at the residents and would bump into them inappropriately hugging them. She said she was afraid of TA K as he had a habit of coming into the women's room not knocking when he knows they were dressing. She said she was afraid of him because he was always threatening the residents in one way or another (unspecific regarding threats). She said she did not complete the safe survey given by the facility because they were required to sign their name on the document and she didn't feel safe if she did that. During an interview on 09/22/2022 at 2:20 PM with Resident #8's son said she has mentioned the inappropriate behavior TA K displayed and he is in the process of getting her move out of the facility. Resident #23 Review of Resident #23's undated face sheet revealed she was a [AGE] year-old-female re-admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of: Displaced fracture of base of neck of left femur, Overactive bladder, Pneumonia, unspecified organism, Unspecified abnormalities of gait and mobility, and subsequent encounter for fracture with routine healing. Review of Resident #23's Initial MDS dated [DATE] revealed she had a BIMS score of 14 indicating was cognitively intact and able to make her needs known. Section G (Function Status) revealed she required extensive assistance with personal hygiene. Review of Care Plan dated 08/10/2022 revealed she was at risk for pressure ulcers and at risk for amenia. During an interview with Resident #23 on 09/22/2022 at 11:05 AM she said TA K came one night to change me and asked me if I wanted to make love. She said she told him that was a very inappropriate question. She said he said she misunderstood her and changed her brief. She said he made her very uncomfortable and lucky she only needs to be changed one time, she said her husband Resident #32 (lives in same room) said he did not hear the conversation, but TA K goes down the hall and yells and is very loud. Residents #23 and #32 did not remember being asked to complete a safe survey given by the facility. Resident #30 Review of Resident #30's undated face sheet revealed he was a [AGE] year-old-male admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of: Malignant neoplasm of unspecified part of unspecified bronchus or lung (Admission), anxiety disorder, unspecified, Pain, unspecified, and Unspecified displaced fracture of surgical neck of left humerus. Review of Resident #30's MDS dated [DATE] with a BIMS of 3 indicating he was severely cognitively impaired. Section G (Function Status) revealed he required extensive assistance for personal hygiene. During one-on-one interviews with Resident #30 on 09/23/2022 3:00 PM stated he was familiar with TA K, and he worked the night shift. He stated he was uncomfortable around him and felt intimidated. He stated he would rather stay wet than ask him for help because you could tell it made TA K mad. He stated no one else made him feel that way. He stated TA K acted mad and smarted off to them when he took the smokers out to smoke. He stated he could not remember what he said but he knew TA K made him feel bad He could not remember a specific date or time this instances occurred. Resident #7 Review if Resident #7's undated face sheet revealed he was a [AGE] year-old-male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of: Chronic pain due to trauma, Anorexia nervosa, binge eating/purging type, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, Tachycardia, unspecified, Gastro-esophageal reflux disease with esophagitis, without bleeding without bleeding, Heart failure, unspecified, Disorder of thyroid, unspecified, Vascular dementia with behavior disturbances. Review of Resident #7's Quarterly MDS 09/24/2022 revealed he had a BIMS score of 15 indicating he was cognitively intact and able to make his needs known. Section G (Functional Section) revealed he required extensive assistance for personal hygiene. During interview with Resident #7 on 09/22/2022 at 2:45 PM he said he always arguing with TA K because he always made a fuss about changing me. He called me a bitch and not being a man because Resident #7 needed someone to change him. During an interview with the Administrator and DON on 09/22/2022 at 11:40 AM said she must find out what is going on by the DON. She said she found out TA K left one night and went home around 11:00 PM (disciplinary documentation stated date of incident 08/31/2022) and was missing for 5 hours. She said human resources said we had the options of terminating him or counsel him and allow him to return to work. She said we were given that options. Could said we had two options. He said the Aide who worked with him said he left for 5 hours and fell asleep at home. HR (human resources) said it was clear cut reason to terminate him, but we were given the option of counsel him. Regarding the call lights not working they are working, he said if you turn on the call light on the North Hall the panel on the South Hall lights up and nurses are aware of the call lights needed to be answered. He said they ordered a lock out panel, so nurses must put in a code to turn off the call light when it is answered to turn it off. He said he was not aware of any alarms being turned off on the North Hall. Interview with Activity Director on 09/22/2022 at 12:15 PM said she was aware of the problems the resident was having with TA and has given the Resident Council minuets to the ADON and they discuss the problem in the stand-up meetings. She said they counseled him and let him come back. She said she has no influence on who to hire or fire. All I can do is make the Administrator know. During an interview with Resident #38 on 09/22/2022 at 12:35 PM she said the call lights will turn on a light will come on outside the room, but the alarm will not come on. Observation of Resident Call light being turned on 09/22/2022 at 12:35 PM revealed the light outside of her room coming on but not audible sound coming on. Observation on 09/23/2022 at 9:30 AM, the call light alarm system was checked on the North Hall. In the center of the hallway there was a switch which could turn off and on the audible alarm. The alarm was currently in the off position. Upon testing of the alarm, when the alarm was in the off position, there was no audible alarm. When the alarm was in the on position, an audible alarm could be heard. During an interview with ADON on 09/22/2022 at 4:35 PM said she had never been given any of the grievances or Resident Council minutes and had not been aware of residents being threatened. She said she was aware of the sexual allegations in the monning stand-up meeting with the department heads but that was pretty much it. She said on 09/21/2022 she confronted TA K regarding his charting for POC (point of care) because it was low, and he said .he did not give a fuck about the POCs, and they would not be done. She said she asked him to discuss the matter with her and he said, he did not have to talk to her, and he discussed with the Administrator what kind of person she was and did not have to talk to her. During an interview with the Administrator on 09/23/2022 at 10:40 AM she said she separated the perpetrator from the sexual assault allegation, and he was suspended for 3 days, and it was cleared by HHSC. She said she conducted a safe survey questionnaire and sent the self-report to HHSC at the require time. Surveyor asked if she was aware of the threatening complaints the residents were receiving from TA K. She said this was the first time she heard about the complaints and never received any of the Resident Council Minutes or grievances. She was told by the survey team residents did not trust her to keep them safe when they had to sign the safe survey questionnaire and felt like they could not be truthful with the questions. During interview with CNA L on 09/23/2022 at 3:00 PM said she was working the South Hall and noticed the call light panel going off for residents on the North Hall. She said TA K was only allowed to work the North Hall because of the allegations of sexual abuse by Resident #35. She said she went to the North Hall and noticed several call lights on and took care of the residents. She said she then texted TA K and asked where he was, she said he wrote back and said he went home and fell asleep. She said he said he will be back. He did not come back till 5 in the morning. She said he threatened her if she told anyone, and she called the Administrator and she said not to take any more calls from him. During an interview with Administrator 09/25/2022 at 2:30 PM said Resident #35 came to her and said TA K was telling us on smoke break we are all a bunch of liars, and he would preach about he was tight with God, and we were going to hell. And Resident #35 was making up the sexual assault allegation. She said regarding the interview of CNA L Administrator said because of the sexual abuse allegation there were not to be any discussions about what happened that is why I told her not to take any more calls from TA K. When asked by the surveyors if Administrator thought calling the residents liars and preaching, she said she told TA K not to preach to the residents anymore. Administrator added TA K has been terminated. Record review of the facility's Filing Grievance/Complaints Policy with a revision date of April 2017 indicated the following [In-part]: Any resident, family member, or appointed resident representative may file a grievance or complaint concerning care, treatment, behavior of other residents, staff members, theft of property, or any other concerns regarding his or her stay at the facility. Grievances also may be voiced or filed regarding care that has not been furnished. 2. Residents, family and resident representatives have the right to voice or file grievances without discrimination or reprisal in any form, and without fear of discrimination or reprisal. 3. All grievances, complaints or recommendations stemming from resident or family groups concerning is-sues of resident care in the facility will be considered. Actions on such issues will be responded to in writing, including a rationale for the response. 4. Upon admission, residents are provided with written information on how to file a grievance or complaint. A copy of our grievance/complaint procedure is posted on the resident bulletin board. 5. Grievances and/or complaints may be submitted orally or in writing and may be filed anonymously. 6. The contact information for the individual(s) with whom a grievance may be filed is provided to the resident and/or representative upon admission. 7. The Administrator has delegated the responsibility of grievance and/or complaint investigation to the Grievance Officer who is __Dominique [NAME], Administrator ______ and can be contacted. 8. Upon receipt of a grievance and/or complaint, the Grievance Officer will review and investigate the allegations and submit a written report of such findings to the Administrator within five (5) working days of receiving the grievance and/or complaint. 9. The Grievance Officer will coordinate actions with the appropriate state and federal agencies, depending on the nature of the allegations. All alleged violations of neglect, abuse and/or misappropriation of property will be reported and investigated under guidelines for reporting abuse, neglect and misappropriation of property, as per state law. 10. The Grievance Officer, Administrator and Staff will take immediate action to prevent further potential vi-olations of resident rights while the alleged violation is being investigated. 11. The Administrator will review the findings with Grievance Officer to determine what corrective actions, if any, need to be taken. 12. The resident, or person filing the grievance and/or complaint on behalf of the resident, will be informed (verbally and in writing) of the findings of the investigation and the actions that will be taken to correct any identified problems. The Administrator, or his or her designee, will make such reports orally within _____ working days of the filing of the grievance or complaint with the facility. A written summary of the investigation will also be provided to the resident, and a copy will be filed in the business office. 13. If the grievance was filed anonymously, the Grievance Officer will inform the resident that a grievance has been anonymously filed on his or her behalf and the steps that will be taken to investigate the grievance(s) and report the findings. The Grievance Officer will reiterate to the resident that it is against facility policy and federal regulations to discriminate or sanction a resident who has filed or verbalized a complaint against the facility, and that his or her rights to be free of discrimination or reprisal will be protected. 14. The results of all grievances files, investigated and reported will be maintained on file for a minimum of three years from the issuance of the grievance decision. 15. This policy will be provided to the resident or the resident's representative upon request.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan to meet the highest ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan to meet the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial needs for 3 of 18 residents (Residents # 24, #30) reviewed for care plans as follows: Resident #24 did not have a comprehensive care plan for his weight loss (peripherally inserted central catheter) or his diagnosis of Clostridioides Difficile. Residents # 30 did not have a care plan for psychotropic drug use. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the care required to meet their physical, mental, and psychosocial needs to attain or maintain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial outcome. Findings include: Resident # 24 Review of Resident #24's Electronic admission Record viewed on 09/20/2022 revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #24's ICD-10 diagnoses listed in the electronic medical record reflected diagnoses of enterocolitis due to clostridioides difficile (a germ which causes diarrhea) Abnormal weight loss, diarrhea sepsis, and inflammation of the colon and hypoxic encephalopathy. Observation of Resident #24 on 09/20/22 at 11:47 AM revealed that Resident #24 was not interviewable and had a peripherally inserted intravenous line ordered and present on r his left upper arm. Record review of Resident #24's care plan dated 008/22/2022 revealed he was not care planned for his intravenous line in his left upper arm or his diagnoses of clostridioides Difficile dated. During an interview with the DON on 09/21/19/22 at 11:27 AM, he stated the MDS Nurse, and the nurses were responsible for forming care plans. They said the MDS Nurse did the quarterly and annual and assisted the nurses with the initial and acute care plans. They said the DON's role involved overseeing the care plan as and going over them with the MDS Nurse They said care plan updates were reviewed during clinical morning meetings which took place Monday through Friday. They were unable to provide a reason for the lack of care planning related to Resident #24's intravenous line or his diagnoses of clostridioides difficile (dated 9/15/22) He stated he had only been there since April 2022 and the ADON had been there for the last month and she was a mobile ADON and not permanent for this facility. He stated both areas should have been care planned. The DON, who was new to the position, will be getting additional training in his responsibilities from his corporation soon. Resident # 30 Record Review of Resident #30's face sheet dated 09/24/22 revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: anxiety disorder (3/15/22), fracture of left humerus, malignant neoplasm of skin of right lower leg. Record Review of Resident #30 significant change MDS dated [DATE] indicated the resident had a BIMS of 3 which indicated severe cognitive Record Review of Resident #30's significant change MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident # 30 had not received an antianxiety agent. Record review of controlled substance sheets revealed the #30 had lorazepam 2mg administer to him on 3/15/22, 3/18/22, 4/11/22, 7/31/22, 8/1/22 and 8/7/22. Record review of Resident #30's physician orders dated 9/25/22 revealed orders for Lorazepam 1mg every 2 hours as needed for anxiety; for Lorazepam 1mg ½ tablet every 2 hours as needed for anxiety; for Lorazepam 2mg every 3 hours as needed for anxiety; Record Review of Resident #30's Care Plan dated 05/15/22 revealed the care plan did not address prn use of an anti - anxiety agent. Record Review of Resident #30's Care Plan dated 06/02/22 revealed care plan did not address smoking. During an interview with the ADON on 09/24/22 at 2:00 PM she stated Resident # 30 should have a care plan for psychotropic drug use due to his prn use of Ativan. She stated a prn order for Ativan would only be good for 14 days. During an interview with the Regional Nurse Consultant on 09/25/22 at 10:38 AM, the Regional Nurse Consultant stated each interdisciplinary team was responsible for developing and revising the care plan when a change occurs and the DON signs off on the care plan. The Regional Nurse stated the residents, care should be care planned. She stated that the MDS Nurse, Nurses, and DON were responsible for the care plan. She stated not completing or revising the care plan could result in the resident not receiving needed care. Record review of the facility's policy, Care Plans- Comprehensive Person-Centered, Revised December 2020, revealed the following documentation: Applicability: this policy sets forth the procedures relating to developing a comprehensive, person-centered care plan. Policy Statement A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the Resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: #8. The comprehensive, person-centered care plan will: Include measurable objectives and time frames. 1. Describe the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable, physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. 2. Incorporate services that would be provided for the above, however, they are not provided due to the resident exercising his or her rights. 3. Include the resident's goals upon admission and desired outcomes. #10. Identifying problem areas and their causes and developing interventions that are targeted and meaningful to the Resident, are the endpoint of an interdisciplinary process.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who were unable to carry out ac...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene for 3 of 26 residents (Resident's# 5, 17 and 34), reviewed for activities of daily living. The facility failed to provide timely incontinence care for Resident #5. The facility failed to provide nail care for Resident's #17 and #34. The facility failed to provide oral care for Resident #34. These failures could place residents who were dependent on staff for ADL care at risk for loss of dignity, risk for infections, skin breakdown, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included: Resident #5 Review of Resident #5's Face Sheet, dated 09/23/22, revealed a [AGE] year-old male, admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included: Hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting unspecified side (admission Diagnosis), Parkinson's Disease, epileptic seizures related to external causes, aphasia, and need for assistance with personal care. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #5 dated 06/28/22 reflected a BIMS score of 99 which indicated the resident was not able to complete the assessment. Resident #5 was assessed to require extensive assistance with toilet use and personal hygiene. In an observation and interview during initial rounds on 09/20/22 at 9:20 AM, Resident #5 was lying in bed covered with a sheet, with numerous flies flying around him, pointing to his brief. He had difficulty speaking but would point. Observation of his brief revealed it was soaked and he was lying in wet bed linens. Resident said he had been wet for a long time. In an interview during initial rounds on 09/20/22 at 9:30 AM, CNA K said she was the only CNA on the hallway and had not got to him yet. She said she would clean him. CNA K came back into the room and said she was going to give him a bath but would have to use the Hoyer lift and would have to wait for the other 2 CNAs in the facility to assist. In an interview during initial rounds on 09/20/22 at 9:35 AM, LVN C said CNA K was the only CNA on the hallway and she had not got to him yet. She said Resident #5 required a Hoyer lift and they had to wait for the other 2 CNAs to come and assist. She said Resident #5 currently did not have any skin breakdown or any concerns with skin integrity. In an interview on 09/21/22 at 5:02 PM, the DON said it was his expectation for resident's to be changed when needed. He said the holdup was due to the resident requiring a Hoyer lift. The DON said he would review the staffing. Resident #17 Review of Resident #17's Face Sheet, not dated, revealed a [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included: Cerebral infarction, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following other cerebrovascular disease affecting left non-dominant side, personal history of pulmonary embolism, and need for assistance with personal care. Observation on 09/20/22 during initial rounds revealed # 17's fingernails on both hands were long and needed cleaning and cutting. Review of the Quarterly MDS for Resident #17 dated 08/10/22 reflected a BIMS score of 07 (severe impairment). Resident #17 was documented to require extensive assistance with personal hygiene. Interview on 9/22/22 at 12:35 PM, CNA L said the CNAs cut nails when they had the time, and the nurse cuts the diabetics. In an interview on 09/21/22 at 12:35 PM, LVN B said she didn't know exactly who was supposed to cut nails. Resident #34 Review of Resident #34's Face Sheet, dated 09/25/22, revealed a [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included: vascular dementia, cerebral infarction due to thrombosis of left middle cerebral artery (stroke), hemiplegia unspecified affecting right dominate side (paralysis rt dominant side), aphasia, (unable to speak), dysphagia (unable to swallow), and need for assistance with personal care. Review of the Quarterly MDS for Resident #34 dated 08/16/22 reflected a BIM) was not able to be completed. Resident #34 was assessed to require extensive assistance with personal hygiene. Review of Resident #24's care plan revealed she had an approach with a start date of 4/8/22 to perform oral care every shift, assistance with bathing and hygiene every shift, and Resident #34 was NPO (nothing by mouth). In an observation on 09/20/22 at 10:40 AM, Resident #34 was lying in bed in the Rt lateral position on a low bed. Her nails were long and unkempt, and her lips were dry and cracked with peeling skin. In an observation on 09/20/22 at 4:06 PM, Resident #34's nails were dirty and needed trimming. Her lips were dry and cracked and skin peeling. Unable to obtain an interview Resident #34 due to decreased cognitive status. Interview with LVN E at 10:40 AM on 9/20/22 revealed it was the aide's duty to perform oral hygiene and nail care for Resident #34. She stated Nurses monitored the residents to ensure this was done. Interview on 9/21/22 at 06:45 with CNA I, revealed CNAs were for responsible nail care and oral hygiene. She stated she would ask the nurse if she had questions about a resident's care. Record Review of the facility policy Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), Supporting revised March 2018, revealed the following [in part] . Policy Statement Residents will provide with care, treatment, and services as appropriate to maintain or improve their ability to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs). Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene. Policy Interpretation and Implementation 2. Appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADLs independently, with the consent of the resident and in accordance with the plan of care, including appropriate support and assistance with: a. Hygiene (bathing, dressing, grooming, and oral care); b. Mobility (transfer and ambulation, including walking); c. Elimination (toileting).
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0692 (Tag F0692)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status, s...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as usual body weight or desirable body weight range and electrolyte balance, unless the resident's clinical condition demonstrates that it is not possible or resident preferences indicated otherwise for 2 Residents 0f 4 (Resident #'s 10 and 24) reviewed for weight loss. The facility failed to ensure Resident #10 did not have unplanned weight loss of 5% in 30 days. The facility failed to ensure Resident # 24 did not have unplanned weight loss of 7.7 % in 30 days. This failure could place residents at risk of not maintaining their nutritional needs. The findings included: Resident #10 Record review of Resident #10's electronic face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old male with an original admission date of 11/9/20. He had diagnoses which included: sepsis, need for assistance with personal care, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), muscle wasting and, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a chronic lung condition). Record review of Resident # 10's Quarterly MDS, section C, dated 07/13/22, revealed a resident was unable to complete the BIMS Staff assessment for mental status. Review of section G revealed the resident required extensive assistance with dressing, and personal hygiene, and supervision, oversight or cueing with eating. Section K indicated the resident had a 5% wt. loss in one month. or 10% or more in 6 months and was not on a prescribed weight loss program. It documented he was on a mechanically altered diet and did not document that he was on Hospice. Record review of Resident #10's orders, dated 09/23/2022, revealed the resident was on a mechanical soft diet with thin liquids. There was no order for Hospice. Record review of the EMR for Resident # 10 revealed the following weights: 6/30/22 125 6/8/22 128 4/12/22 weight not taken Record review of the dietary progress notes revealed the following: No Dietary progress notes found for this resident since 2/24/21 it indicated: Wt. Note: Wt. reviewed, per Nursing, resident no longer being weighed at the request of Hospice. Most recent wt. obtained 11/9(113.63#). Intake avg 75-100% per ADL & CNA. Diet: Reg/Reg/Thin. No reported difficulty w/ chewing/swallowing. Skin intact per wound management. Meds reviewed: Folic acid. No recent labs. Intake > 75% w/ meals & fortified foods should aide in meeting kcal/pro needs. Will continue to monitor intake/wt. trend. Recommendation: Continue current POC - Intake meets pattern meeting needs Goal: Intake > 75%. Stable wt. +/- 5%. Skin intact Record Review of Resident #10's care plan did not address his dietary or nutritional needs or refusal of wts. There was no hospice care plan . In an interview and observation on 09/20/2022 at 12:45 PM, Resident #10 shook his head no that he was not hungry when asked by the surveyor. Resident had eaten less than 25 % of his diet at that time. In an observation and interview with TA 0 at 12:45 PM, TA O stated she served Resident#10 lunch in his room. She stated he did not like to get up. She stated the aides stated the aides monitored the amount the residents ate, and the amount eaten and recorded it in the Kiosk. During interview on 9/20/22 at 1:30 PM with LVN E, she stated residents who were served their meals in their rooms should be assisted if needed and offered a substitute if they did not eat. She stated the CNA's monitored the meal intake for the residents, offered substitutes, and recorded the amount eaten. in the electronic medical record. She stated she did not know who was responsible for obtaining weights or how often residents should be weighed. Resident #24 Review of Resident #24's Electronic admission Record viewed on 09/20/2022 revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the resident's ICD-10 diagnoses listed in the electronic medical record reflected diagnoses of enterocolitis due to clostridioides difficile (a germ which causes diarrhea) Abnormal weight loss, diarrhea, sepsis, and inflammation of the colon and hypoxic encephalopathy. Record Review of # 24's admission MDS dated [DATE] Section K revealed the resident weighed 129 lbs on admission and was 5 foot 5 inches tall. It documented the resident did not have a significant wt loss or gain . The MDS documented the resident received tube feedings and that he received 55 % or more of his nutrition from tube feedings. Record review of Resident #24's care plan dated 08/22/2022 revealed he turned his feeding tube off at times and hat a nutritional care [NAME] with a goal of [NAME] wt. His intervention was listed as NPO. No other interventions were noted. There was no intervention to monitor #24's wt . Record review of Resident # 24's wts in the EMR 09/21/22 09:45 AM Weight: 119 lbs. / Routine BMI: 19.8 08/22/2022 10:00 AM Weight: 129 lbs. / Routine BMI: 21.46 9/13/2022 02:26 PM Weight: 119 lbs. / Routine BMI: 19.8 08/22/2022 10:00 AM Weight: 129 lbs. / Routine BMI: 21.46 Record review of the RD Weight Loss Note revealed the following: Weight: 119# (-7.7%x30d) Height: 65in BMI: 19.8 (normal) Diet: Pureed diet, text, Nectar Thick liquids Intake: varies, avg. 51-75% TF: Water flush 200cc q6hr Supplement/Snack orders: House Supplement 120ml TID, Ready Care RT Shake TID. Providing: 1320kcal/48gPro (720kcal/30gPro + 600kcal/18gPro) Intake of supplement varies avg. 75% Chewing or swallowing difficulty: none noted Feeding ability: total dependence Skin condition: no PIs noted Adaptive devices: none noted Pertinent labs: no updated labs available to review Nutritionally relevant meds: aspirin, Summary: Resident triggering for sig. weight loss x30d. BMI below favorable range. Resident on supplement for support. Noted per last RD note resident was previously receiving combo TF and PO intake however DC's d/t resident unable to tolerate TF. Visited resident at bedside non-verbal but shakes head yes/no. Resident said yes to noticing weight loss. Per nursing resident feeling nauseas r/t IV antibiotics. Resident likely not meeting needs with diet intake r/t varied PO intake of meals and nausea aeb sig. weight loss x30d. Recommend: 1.Add Fortified Food Plan to all meals 2.Add Magic cup 30d QD 3.Continue weekly weights x4weeks Goals: wt. maintenance +/-3%x30d or slow weight gain of 1-2#/week towards IBW, consistent PO intake >51%, maintain good skin integrity. RD Observation of Resident #24 on 09/20/22 at 11:47 AM revealed that Resident #24 was not interviewable and had a peripherally inserted intravenous line present on resident his left upper arm. He had eaten less than 25% of his diet. An interview on 09/23/22 at 9:14 AM with the ADON revealed the aides had been getting the weights. She stated she thought that the policy stated weekly weights beginning on admission and for 3 weeks after admission to monitor the resident's weight. She stated she did not know why the weekly weights weren't done. She stated she had been there for a month, and she did not know why the weights had not been done. In an interview on 09/23/22 at 10:00 AM the [NAME] stated that the ADON was responsible for weights. He was not sure what the policy was on weights and was not aware residents should be weighed on admission and weekly for the next 3 weeks. He was aware that Resident #24 was tube fed on admission but stated he was eating a pureed diet now due to the resident not tolerating his tube feedings. He stated he was aware of a discrepancy with some of the weights and stated the scales had recently been recalibrated. The DON presented documentation of a receipt for scale recalibration which was dated 9/20/22. He stated that the failure to monitor residents weights accurately could result in undetected wt loss and a decline in health. Record review of the document provided by the facility titled Weight Management Workflow, with an effective date of dated 7/20/22 revealed in part: admission: Obtain admission weight and height within 24 hours of admission to the center and enter result into MatrixCare Vitals section of the resident's electronic health record. Initiate a nutrition care plan within 48 hours of admission. The resident is weighed once a week for 3 additional weeks post admission to establish baseline weight. Monthly: The resident will be weighed once a month Initial monthly weight will be presented to the DON for review by the 5th of each month. The DON identifies any resident with a 5 lbs. loss or gain and has the resident re-weighed by the 9th of the month under the supervision of a licensed nurse. After the re-weights are completed, the DON will review the monthly weights for accuracy and the weight are entered into the EMR. Update the care plan for each resident identified with a 5% loss or gain in 30 days, a 7.5 % loss or gain in 90 days, or a 10 % loss or gain in 180 days. Residents with weight loss or gain are placed on weekly weights for 3 additional weeks or until the next monthly weights are obtained and evaluated.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0868 (Tag F0868)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the quality assessment and assurance committee met at least quarterly. The facility failed to hold QAPI meetings at least Quarterly...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the quality assessment and assurance committee met at least quarterly. The facility failed to hold QAPI meetings at least Quarterly. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving quality medical care, decreased quality of life, and exposure to safety hazards. The findings included: In an interview on 09/25/22 at 2:03 PM, the Administrator said they started having QAPI meetings on the third Friday of each month. Their first meeting was on 09/16/22. The Administrator said she was hired on 08/08/22 and there were no prior QAPI meetings to knowledge before this date. The Administrator said she was responsible for ensuring QAPI meetings were held. The Administrator said failure to have QAPI meetings could prevent the facility problems from being corrected and monitored which could lead to decreased resident care and health. Review of the facility's policy titled Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program - Governance and Leadership, dated as revised March 2020, revealed [in part]: Policy Interpretation and Implementation 1. The Administrator, whether a member of the QAPI Committee or not, is ultimately responsible for the QAPI Program, and for interpreting its results and findings to the governing body. 7. The committee meets at least quarterly (or more often as necessary). Committee members are reminded of meeting day, time and location via e-mail at least two business days prior to the meeting.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an Infection Prevention and Cont...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an Infection Prevention and Control Program designed to prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for infection prevention and control . A. The facility failed to initiate transmission-based precautions to prevent the spread of infections for Resident # 24. B. The facility failed to change gloves and perform hand hygiene when moving from a clean to a dirty area during incontinent care for Resident #22. This failure could place residents at risk for infections. The findings included: Resident 24 Review of Resident #24's Face Sheet not dated revealed he was a 35- year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of: enterocolitis due to clostridium difficile, abnormal weight loss diarrhea, severe sepsis, and bacteriuria (bacteria in the urine). Review of #24's admission MDS dated [DATE] revealed R #24: - Required 1 - 2 person assist for bed mobility, transfer and personal hygiene. Staff assessment for mental status indicated the resident had a problem with long term memory, short term memory, decision making, had no signs of delirium and had disorganized thinking at times. The resident was documented as having no behaviors. Review of the physician orders for #24 revealed the resident had a physician order for a stool specimen to be obtained to test for C. Diff on 9/1/22. Review of Dr orders #24, dated 9/17/22 revealed the resident had orders for Vancomycin and metronidazole to be administer IV for a diagnosis of C. Diff. (Infection by bacteria of the colon). Review of #24's care plan did not include a problem for the diagnosis of c. diff and transmission-based precautions. Review of nurse notes for #24 dated 09/16/22/18 revealed Spoke with Nurse Practitioner and he stated the labs showed an elevated white count and possible c. diff and stated we can do IV access or PICC line access if unable to start an IV. Review of nurse's notes for #24 dated 9/20/22 and 9/21/22 revealed the resident was on standard precautions, was being monitored for active infection, and was on antibiotic therapy. Interview with LVN A (the nurse assigned to care for #24)on 09/20/22 at 7:19 AM revealed, she did not know what Resident #24 was receiving antibiotics for and she had not heard that he had a diagnosis for C. Diff. Interview with CNA I at 7:29 AM on 9/20/22 revealed she had not been told by a nurse that #24 had C. Diff. She stated she had been a CNA for 14 years and she suspected it because the resident had diarrhea and his stools smelled like C. Diff. She stated resident #24 had diarrhea all night, and she did wear PPE because she knew he had C. diff from the smell. She stated she went to the supply room and just got what she thought she needed and went to his room to care for him. She also stated she took a garbage bag with her into the room to dispose of the soiled pep and then took it to the dumpster after she was done. She stated nobody told her, she just knew what to do. Interview on 9/21/22 at 7:30 AM, TA O revealed no one had instructed her on the use of PPE and TBP precautions for #24. TA Interview with Assistant Director of Nursing and DON on 9/21/18 at 7:57 AM revealed neither was aware of the C. Diff diagnose for #24. The DON stated he was the Infection Preventionist. He acknowledged the diagnosis for C. Diff was documented on 9/16/22 and the infection preventionist and the DON should have been notified by the nurse that took the order for the diagnosis. He stated the resident should have immediately been placed on isolation on TBP and staff be notified the resident was on transmission-based precautions. He stated the failure could result in the spread of infection to other resident's and staff. The ADON informed the surveyor that PPE was to be donned before entering a resident's rooms that was diagnosed with C. Diff with an isolation sign on the door of the room. She stated she was in the process of placing the resident on isolation. Resident #22 Review of Resident #22's face sheet revealed she was a [AGE] year-old female with the following diagnoses: Need for assistance with personal care, candidiasis of vulva and vagina, hemiplegia and Muscle weakness Review of #22's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed R #22: - Required 1 - 2 person assist for bed mobility, personal hygiene, and bathing. Resident was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. Her BIMS was 15 which indicated she was cognitively intact. Observation on 09/21/22 3:20 PM revealed peri care on #24 by CNA F and TA (transitional aide) O. Both CNAs washed their hands and donned gloves and provided privacy. CNA F and TA O removed #22's brief and wiped her abdomen and cleaned her vagina and spread her labia and wiped from front to back. They then turned #22 toward CNA, TA O and CNA F wiped her buttocks, which had feces. CNA F cleaned the area and did not remove her gloves and sanitize her hands before moving to a clean area and touching clean supplies. TA O Assisted in putting on #22's new brief without sanitizing her hands or changing gloves. Assisted turning resident to the supine position touching brief and areas considered clean without removing gloves or sanitizing hands throughout the process. An interview with CNA F and TA O on 09/21/22 at 3:40 PM revealed that neither CNA could think of anything they would have done differently during the procedure. Interview with the DON on 9/25/22 at 1:00 PM, revealed he would expect the staff to sanitize hands after completing a procedure. He stated it was important to perform hand hygiene after a procedure to prevent the spread of infection. Record review of the facility policy Isolation - Initiating Transmission-Based Precautions, revised August 2019, revealed the following [in part] . Policy Statement Transmission-Based Precautions are initiated when a resident develops signs and symptoms of a transmissible infection; arrives for admission with symptoms of an infection; or has a laboratory confirmed infection; and is at risk of transmitting the infection to other residents. Transmission-Based Precautions may include Contact Precautions, Droplet Precautions, or Airborne Precautions. Policy Interpretation and Implementation 1. If a resident is suspected of, or identified as, having a communicable infectious disease, the Charge Nurse or Nursing Supervisor notifies the Infection Preventionist and the resident's Attending Physician for evaluation of appropriate Transmission-Based Precautions. 3. When Transmission-Based Precautions are implemented, the Infection Preventionist (or designee): a. Clearly identifies the type of precautions, the anticipated duration, and the personal protective equip-mint (PPE) that must be used. b. Explains to the resident (or representative) the reason(s) for the precautions. c. Provides and/or oversees the education of the resident, representative and/or visitors regarding the precautions and use of PPE. d. Determines the appropriate notification on the room entrance door and on the front of the resident's chart so that personnel and visitors are aware of the need for and type of precautions: (1) The signage informs the staff of the type of CDC precaution(s), instructions for use of PPE, and/or instructions to see a nurse before entering the room. (2) Signs and notifications comply with the resident's right to confidentiality or privacy. e. Ensures that protective equipment (i.e., gloves, gowns, masks, etc.) is maintained outside the resident's room so that anyone entering the room can apply the appropriate equipment. f. Ensures that protective equipment and supplies needed to maintain precautions during care are in the resident's room; and g. Ensures that an appropriate linen barrel/hamper and waste container, with appropriate liner, are placed in or near the resident's room. Record Review of the facility policy Isolation - Categories of Transmission-Based Precautions, (revised January 2012), revealed the following [in part] . Policy Statement 1. Standard Precautions shall be used when caring for residents at all times regardless of their suspected or confirmed infection status. Transmission-Based Precautions shall be used when caring for residents who are documented or suspected to have communicable diseases or infections that can be transmitted to others. 2. Examples of infections requiring Contact Precautions include, but are not limited to: b. Diarrhea associated with Clostridium difficile. The facility will implement a system to alert staff to the type of precaution resident requires Record Review of the facility policy Handwashing/Hand Hygiene, (revised August 2019), revealed the following [in part] . Policy Statement This facility considers hand hygiene the primary means to prevent the spread of infections. Policy Interpretation and Implementation 1. All personnel shall be trained and regularly in-serviced on the importance of hand hygiene in preventing the transmission of healthcare-associated infections. 2. All personnel shall follow the handwashing/hand hygiene procedures to help prevent the spread of infections to other personnel, residents, and visitors. 6. Wash hands with soap (antimicrobial or non-antimicrobial) and water for the following situations: When hands are visibly soiled; and After contact with a resident with infectious diarrhea including, but not limited to infections caused by norovirus, salmonella, shigella and C. difficile. 7. Use an alcohol-based hand rub containing at least 62% alcohol; or, alternatively, soap (antimicrobial or non-antimicrobial) and water for the following situations: b. Before and after direct contact with residents. f. Before donning sterile gloves. g. Before handling clean or soiled dressings, gauze pads, etc. h. Before moving from a contaminated body site to a clean body site during resident care. j. After contact with blood or bodily fluids. m. After removing gloves.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0919 (Tag F0919)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident rooms were adequately equipped to allow residents to call for staff assistance through a communication system...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident rooms were adequately equipped to allow residents to call for staff assistance through a communication system which relays the call directly to a staff member or to a centralized staff work area, for the entire facility reviewed for call system functioning. The facility's call system was not fully functional. The system did not have a working audible signal that was consistently used. This failure could place residents at risk of being unable to call for assistance from staff. The findings included: During Resident Council meeting om 09/21/2022 at 10:15 AM, 5 Residents #7, #8, #23, #35, #38 voiced concerns that the call light was not coming on when it was engaged, or the system possibly being turned off. In an interview on 09/22/2022 at 12:35 PM, Resident #38 said the call lights will turn on a light above the door outside the room, but the alarm will not come on. In an observation on 09/22/2022 at 12:35 PM, Resident #39's call light was turned on. The lights outside of the residents' doors were lighting up to indicate that the resident was calling for assistance. There was no audible sound. In an interview on 09/22/22 at 1:00 PM, CAN N said the call lights audible signal can be turned down at the call light panel located behind the nurses station on the south hall. In an interview on 09/22/2022 at 1:15 PM, Resident #17 said she doesn't know if the call lights work or not it takes them a while to get her most of the time and I don't hear anything. In an observation on 09/23/2022 at 9:30 AM, the alarm system was checked on the North Hall. In the center of the hall a switch could be turn off and on. The sound to the call light alarms was off and the call light alarms could not be heard. In an interview on 09/23/22 at 10:38 AM, the Administrator said she not aware there was a concern with the call light system and the audible signal until it was brought up this morning. The Administrator was unaware staff could turn down the volume of the alarm and are looking at what they can do to correct it. She acknowleged this could result in residents not having their care needs met . During an interview with the Administrator and DON (DON was also the Maintenance Supervisor) on 09/22/2022 at 11:40 AM the Admisistrator stated she would find out what was going on from the DON. The DON stated the call lights were working, he said if you turn on the call light on the North Hall the panel on the South Hall lights up and nurses are aware the call lights need to be answered. The DON stated he ordered a lock out panel, so nurses must put in a code to turn off the call light when it is answered . He stated he was not aware of any alarms being turned off on the North Hall. During an observation and interview with Resident #38 on 09/22/2022 at 12:35 PM she said the call lights will turn on a light will come on outside the room, but the alarm will not come on. The light outside of the room came on but there was no audible sound. An observation on 09/23/2022 at 9:30 AM revealed a switch could be turned off on the North Hall. When the switch was off the sound of the call light was silenced. If the switch was on the call light alarms could be heard. Record review of the facility's Answering the Call Light Policy with a revision date of March 2021 indicated the following [In-part]: 7. Report all defective call lights to the nurse supervisor promptly.
MINOR (C)

Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact

Staffing Information (Tag F0732)

Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to post the actual hours worked by the licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for direct resident care per s...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to post the actual hours worked by the licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for direct resident care per shift on a daily basis. For a minimum of 18 months. The facility failed to update the daily staffing information posting on 09/20/22 to 09/26/22. This failure could place the residents, families, and visitors at risk of not having access to information regarding the daily nurse staffing data and facility census. Findings included: Observation on 09/20/22 at 9:30 AM, revealed the daily staffing pattern was posted in a binder behind the one nurse's station which was located on the south hall. The staffing posting did not include the following required information: resident census, the total number of licensed nurses, unlicensed staff, CNAs, or RNAs scheduled, the actual hours scheduled, or the actual hours worked. Observation on 09/21/22 at 8:30 AM, revealed the daily staffing pattern was posted in a binder behind the one nurse's station which was located on the south hall. The staffing posting did not include the following required information: resident census, the total number of licensed nurses, unlicensed staff, CNAs, or RNAs scheduled, the actual hours scheduled, or the actual hours worked. Observation on 09/22/22 at 10:30 AM, revealed the daily staffing pattern was posted in a binder behind the one nurse's station which was located on the south hall. The staffing posting did not include the following required information: resident census, the total number of licensed nurses, unlicensed staff, CNAs, or RNAs scheduled, the actual hours scheduled, or the actual hours worked. Observation on 09/23/22 at 9:30 AM, revealed the daily staffing pattern was posted in a binder behind the one nurse's station which was located on the south hall. The staffing posting did not include the following required information: resident census, the total number of licensed nurses, unlicensed staff, CNAs, or RNAs scheduled, the actual hours scheduled, or the actual hours worked. Observation on 09/24/22 at 11:30 AM, revealed the daily staffing pattern was posted in a binder behind the one nurse's station which was located on the south hall. The staffing posting did not include the following required information: resident census, the total number of licensed nurses, unlicensed staff, CNAs, or RNAs scheduled, the actual hours scheduled, or the actual hours worked. Observation on 09/25/22 at 9:30 AM, revealed the daily staffing pattern was posted in a binder behind the one nurse's station which was located on the south hall. The staffing posting did not include the following required information: resident census, the total number of licensed nurses, unlicensed staff, CNAs, or RNAs scheduled, the actual hours scheduled, or the actual hours worked. During an interview on 09/21/22 at 8:49 am, the ADON stated the DON was responsible for the staffing posting and she was not aware of any regulation on staff postings. During an interview on 09/25/22 at 9:00 am, the DON stated, he was responsible for the staffing posting, but was not aware of all the information the staffing posting should contain. He further revealed, he was unable to produce 18 months of prior staffing postings. During interview on 09/25/22 at 10:40 am, the Administrator stated, the DON was responsible for nursing staffing and postings.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
  • "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: 4 life-threatening violation(s), 1 harm violation(s), Payment denial on record. Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 28 deficiencies on record, including 4 critical (life-threatening) violations. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
  • • $18,054 in fines. Above average for Texas. Some compliance problems on record.
  • • Grade F (0/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: This facility has 4 Immediate Jeopardy findings. Serious concerns require careful evaluation.

About This Facility

What is Bay Ridge Healthcare Center's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns BAY RIDGE HEALTHCARE CENTER an overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars, which is considered average nationally. Within Texas, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This mid-range rating indicates the facility meets federal standards but may have areas for improvement.

How is Bay Ridge Healthcare Center Staffed?

CMS rates BAY RIDGE HEALTHCARE CENTER's staffing level at 3 out of 5 stars, which is average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 58%, which is 12 percentage points above the Texas average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs. RN turnover specifically is 75%, which is notably high. RNs provide skilled clinical oversight, so turnover in this role can affect medical care quality.

What Have Inspectors Found at Bay Ridge Healthcare Center?

State health inspectors documented 28 deficiencies at BAY RIDGE HEALTHCARE CENTER during 2022 to 2025. These included: 4 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death), 1 that caused actual resident harm, 22 with potential for harm, and 1 minor or isolated issues. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.

Who Owns and Operates Bay Ridge Healthcare Center?

BAY RIDGE HEALTHCARE CENTER is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by NEXION HEALTH, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 58 certified beds and approximately 44 residents (about 76% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in LA PORTE, Texas.

How Does Bay Ridge Healthcare Center Compare to Other Texas Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Texas, BAY RIDGE HEALTHCARE CENTER's overall rating (3 stars) is above the state average of 2.8, staff turnover (58%) is significantly higher than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (3 stars) is at the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Bay Ridge Healthcare Center?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations and the facility's high staff turnover rate.

Is Bay Ridge Healthcare Center Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, BAY RIDGE HEALTHCARE CENTER has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 4 Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 3-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Texas. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.

Do Nurses at Bay Ridge Healthcare Center Stick Around?

Staff turnover at BAY RIDGE HEALTHCARE CENTER is high. At 58%, the facility is 12 percentage points above the Texas average of 46%. Registered Nurse turnover is particularly concerning at 75%. RNs handle complex medical decisions and coordinate care — frequent RN changes can directly impact care quality. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?

Was Bay Ridge Healthcare Center Ever Fined?

BAY RIDGE HEALTHCARE CENTER has been fined $18,054 across 2 penalty actions. This is below the Texas average of $33,259. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.

Is Bay Ridge Healthcare Center on Any Federal Watch List?

BAY RIDGE HEALTHCARE CENTER is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.