CRITICAL
(K)
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Free from Abuse/Neglect
(Tag F0600)
Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, observations, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse and neglect f...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, observations, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse and neglect for 4 (Resident #7, #8, #23, and #38,) of 21 residents on the North Hall and 2 (Resident #30 and #35) of 17 residents on the South Hall.
The Administrator and DON failed to provide necessary protection from staff member (TA K) who verbally and mentally Intimidated residents by yelling at them in angry tones, slammed resident doors to create fear, threatened residents with physical abuse, used retaliatory behavior in not providing timely care and invaded resident privacy by entering residents rooms without knocking or asking permission when female residents were undressing affecting residents' psycho social well-being causing fear and psycho social harm.
On 09/23/22 at 5:10 pm an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified. While the IJ was removed on 09/25/22 at 12:30 pm, the facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy with a scope of pattern due to the facility continuing to monitor the implementation and effectiveness of their plan of removal. The facility Administrator received the IJ template on 09/25/22 at 12:30 PM.
These failures could place the residents at an unsafe environment exposing them to verbal, mental and physical abuse, neglect and mental anguish.
Findings Included:
Resident #38
Record review of Resident #38's undated face sheet revealed she was a [AGE] year-old-female admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of necrotizing fasciitis (flesh eating bacteria), cellulitis of the lower limb, hypokalemia, abscess of the mouth, nausea vomiting, chronic diarrhea and pain in right toe.
Record review of Resident #38's MDS re-admission dated 05/26/2022 revealed she had a BIMS (brief interview for memory status) of 15 indicating she was cognitively intact and able to make her needs known. Section G (functional status) revealed she required supervision for personal hygiene.
Record review of Resident #38's Care Plan dated 05/22/2022 revealed she was at risk for falls, weight loss due to chronic diarrhea, and use of anti-depressant medication.
Record review of Resident #38's physician orders dated 05/28/2022 initial orders revealed the following medications: Cymbalta 60 milligram (anti-depressant) 1 tablet a daily for depression.
During initial tour of the facility on 09/20/22 at 9:35 AM, interview with Resident #38 asked the surveyor what she should do if a staff member threatened her for being a tattle tale. She said she would explain in further detail, but she was on her way to an outing with the activity director and fellow residents and would explain later.
During an interview on 09/21/2022 at 8:00 AM, Resident #38 said TA K worked last night and told her that the state was in the building and that if she told on him (regarding the verbal abuse) it was going to be bad for her (threaten retribution) . She said it was an ongoing issue because of the problems he initially had with the smokers and the complaints against him regarding not giving showers and the allegation of being sexually inappropriate with Resident #35. She said she was afraid of him because of his behaviors, he yells at residents and slams doors and enter rooms without knocking. She said he worked last night (09/20/2022 6:00 PM to 09/21/2022 to 6:00 AM) and told her these things. She said she was told to sign the questionnaire when the thing with Resident #35 came up (sexual abuse allegation) but did not feel comfortable with it.
During an interview 09/21/2022 at 8:10 AM with Resident #38's roommate ( Resident #9) who participates in the smoking area was alert and oriented times three (aware of person place and time). said she witnessed TA K making threatening remarks when he came into their room during his shift ( 09/20/2022 6:00 PM to 09/21/2022 to 6:00 AM)(but in the morning-unsure of the exact time) and accused Resident #9 of telling on him (regarding to the showers, and verbal abuse) and when Resident #9 said she did not tell on him, he then accused Resident #38 and said he would get her. Resident #38 understood TA K threatened to physically assault her.
During an interview on 09/22/2022 at 2:00 PM with Resident #38, while she was on the telephone with her mother, her mother told the surveyor she was aware of the threats Resident #38 was receiving from TA K and hoped the surveyor will help resolve the threats she was receiving him (from TA K).
Resident #35
Record review of Resident #35's undated face sheet revealed she was a [AGE] year-old-female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of: hypertension, heart failure, thrombosis of other thoracic veins (blood clot in thoracic vein), Weakness, Other muscle spasm, and need for assistance with personal care.
Review of Resident #35's annual MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #35 had a BIMS of 15 indicating she was cognitively intact and able to make her needs known. Section G (Functional Status) revealed she required extensive assistance with dressing, bathing, toilet use and hygiene with one person assistance.
Review of Resident #35's Care Plan dated 08/21/2022 revealed resident had communication difficulty, at risk for pressure ulcers, utilize wheelchair for mobility, risk for falls and morbidly obese.
Review of the facility's Incident Report dated 08/31/2022 revealed the following: Sexual assault allegation reported by resident (Resident #35) Resident stated male CNA (TA K) hugged her and made a humping movement rubbed his penis against her arms. Resident said she told male CNA (TA K) to stop. Male CNA (TA K) suspended until further notice pending investigation of allegation of sexual assault allegations . Authorities notified .
Review of Police Report (undated report case #22-02928) revealed Insufficient evidence to substantiate the assault and the State Agency investigator did not find sufficient evidence to substantiate the allegation. Resident #35 disputed their findings and feared TA K.
During Resident Council meeting on 09/21/2022 at 10:15 AM, 14 residents attended, Resident #35 was the president of the council (preceding over the meeting). Residents 6 of (14) expressed grievances regarding TA K because he said he would only give out two cigarettes due to the residents complaining about him about showers. The said he told the residents on the smoke break he can do whatever he wanted to and when he gives out the cigarettes for the breaks even though three cigarettes were giving on other breaks. Several (4 on the north hall) residents said TA K would go up and down the hall and slam doors, yell at residents and just walk into rooms without knocking and especially when the ladies were dressing. Surveyor asked residents attending the Resident Council Meeting how many people were afraid of TA, 9 residents held up their hands including Resident #7, #,8, #23, #35 and #38 (4 others did not wish to be identified).
Resident #8
Review of Resident #8's undated face sheet revealed she was a [AGE] year-old-female re-admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of: bipolar disorder, gout (excessive uric acid collected in joints), pain in ankle and foot, insomnia (difficulty sleeping).
Review of Resident #8's last assessed MDS dated [DATE] revealed she had a BIMS score of 12 indicating she was moderately cognitively impaired but able to make her needs known. Section G (Function Status) revealed she needed set up and supervision with personal hygiene.
Review of Resident #8's Care Plan dated 10/11/2018 revealed to participate in activities, risk for falls due to safety awareness, and chronic illness due to lupus (autoimmune syndrome).
During interview on 09/22/2022 at 10:50 AM Resident #8 said, TA K would yell at the residents and would bump into them inappropriately hugging them. She said she was afraid of TA K; he had a habit of coming into women's room not knocking when he knew they were dressing. She said she was afraid of him because he was always threatening the residents in one way or another (unspecific regarding threats). She said she was told to sign the questionnaire (about Resident #35's sexual assault allegation and if they felt safe) and was uncomfortable about being identified.
During an interview on 09/22/2022 at 2:20 PM with Resident #8's family member, (son) said she mentioned the inappropriate behavior TA K displayed (inappropriate hugging, yelling at residents, slamming doors making threatening comments) and he was in the process of getting her moved out.
Resident #23
Review of Resident #23's undated face sheet revealed she was a [AGE] year-old-female re-admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of: Displaced fracture of base of neck of left femur, Overactive bladder, Pneumonia, abnormalities of gait and mobility.
Review of Resident #23's Initial MDS dated [DATE] revealed she had a BIMS score of 14 indicating she was cognitively intact and able to make her needs known. Section G (Function Status) revealed she required extensive assistance with personal hygiene.
Review of Resident #23's Care Plan dated 08/10/2022 revealed she was at risk for pressure ulcers and at risk for anemia.
During an interview with Resident #23 on 09/22/2022 at 11:05 AM, she said TA K came one night to change her and told her we need to make love. She said she told him that was a very inappropriate statement. She said, he said she misunderstood him and changed her brief. She said he made her very uncomfortable, and she was lucky she only needed to be changed one time. She said her family member, Resident #32 (lives in same room) said he did not hear the conversation, but TA K goes down the hall and yells and was very loud.
Resident #30
Review of Resident #30's undated face sheet revealed he was a [AGE] year-old-male admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of: Malignant neoplasm of bronchus or lung (Admission), anxiety disorder, Pain, and displaced fracture of surgical neck of left humerus.
Review of Resident #30's MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS of 3 indicating he was severely cognitively impaired. Section G (Function Status) revealed he required extensive assistance for personal hygiene.
During one-on-one interview with Resident #30 on 09/23/2022 3:00 PM, he stated he was familiar with TA K, and he worked the night shift. He stated he was uncomfortable around him and felt intimidated. He stated he would rather stay wet than ask him for help because he could tell it (changing his briefs from an incontinent episode) made TA K mad. He stated no one else made him feel that way. He stated TA K acted mad and smarted off to us when he took the smokers out to smoke. He stated he could not remember what he said but he knew TA K made him feel bad He could not remember a specific date or time.
Resident #7
Review of Resident #7's undated face sheet revealed he was a [AGE] year-old-male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of: Chronic pain due to trauma, Anorexia nervosa, binge eating/purging type, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, Tachycardia, Gastro-esophageal reflux disease with esophagitis, Heart failure, disorder of thyroid, Vascular dementia with behavior disturbances.
Review of Resident #7's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed he had a BIMS score of 15 indicating he was cognitively intact and able to make his needs known. Section G (Functional Section) revealed he required extensive assistance for personal hygiene.
During an interview with Resident #7 on 09/22/2022 at 2:45 PM, he said he was always arguing with TA K because he always made a fuss about changing him. He said he called him a bitch and not being a man because Resident #7 needed someone to change him. (Resident #7 said no use to complaining because no one does anything about it. He said they (residents) complain about TA K, but nothing is done (Resident Council grievances)
During an interview with the Administrator and DON on 09/22/2022 at 11:40 AM, they said they must find out what was going on. The Administrator said she found out TA K left one night and went home around 11:00 PM (disciplinary documentation stated date of incident 08/31/2022) and was missing for 5 hours. The Administrator said human resources (corporate) told Administrator and DON they had the options of terminating him or counsel him and allow him to return to work. She said we were given that options. The DON said the Aide who worked with him said he left for 5 hours and fell asleep at home. The Administrator said HR (human resources) told them it was clear cut reason to terminate him, but we were given the option of counseling him. The Administrator and DON stated they chose to allow him to return to work.
Interview with the Activity Director on 09/22/2022 at 12:15 PM, said she was aware of the problems the residents who participates in the smoke breaks during the smoke breaks (#7, #8, #9 #35, and #38 and four more not willing to be identified) was having with TA (transition assistant) and has given the Resident Council minutes to the ADON (resident council minutes and grievances were reviewed by surveyor prior to the Resident Council meeting on 09/21/2022 at 10:15 AM) and they discuss the problem in the stand-up meetings (morning meeting of facility department heads). She said they counseled him and let him come back. She said she has no influence on who to hire or fire. She said, all I can do is make the Administrator know.
During an interview with Resident #38 on 09/22/2022 at 12:35 PM, said the call lights will turn on and a light will come on outside the room, but the alarm will not come on. Resident #38 resides on the hall where TA K works.
Resident #38 said because the call lights would not sound, he TA K could be verbally and mentally abusive.
Resident #38 said because of the sexual abuse allegation TA K had to work on the North Hall the call lights would not sound he TA K could be threatening, yell at the resident slam doors and threaten them.
Observation of Resident #38's Call light being turned on 09/22/2022 at 12:35 PM revealed the light outside of her room coming on but not audible sound coming on.
Observation on 09/23/2022 at 9:30 AM alarm system was checked on the North Hall, in the center of the hall a switch could be turn off and on. When the switch was in the Off position, the audio alarm did not activate when the resident activated the call light system in their room. When the switch was in the on position, the audio alarm sounded when the call light was activated by the resident.
Resident #38 said because the call lights would not sound, he TA K could be verbally and mentally abusive.
During an interview with ADON on 09/22/2022 at 4:35 PM, she said she has never been given any of the grievances or Resident Council minutes by the Activities Director and has not been aware of residents being threatened.
During an interview with the Administrator on 09/23/2022 at 10:40 AM, surveyor asked if she was aware of the complaints from the residents, that they were being threatened by TA K. She said this was the first time she heard about the complaints and never received any of the Resident Council Minutes or grievances. Administrator was told by the survey team.
During interview with CNA I on 09/23/2022 at 3:00 PM, she said she was working the South Hall and noticed the call light panel going off for residents on the North Hall. She said TA K was only allowed to work the North Hall because of the allegations of sexual abuse alleged by Resident #35. She said she went to the North Hall and noticed several call lights on and took care of the residents. She said she then texted TA K and asked where he was, she said he wrote back and said he went home and fell asleep. She said he said he will be back. She said he did not come back untill 5 AM in the morning. She said he threatened her if she told anyone. CNA I was unspecific about the threat but noticed someone was trying to vandalize her car the next night She called the Administrator who said not to take any more calls from him.
Record review revealed inappropriate behavior dated 09/21/2022 at 6:00 AM ADON confronted TA K regarding his charting .he did not give a fuck about charting the point of care in the computer, and they would not be done. She said she asked him to discuss the matter with her and he said, he did not have to talk to her . The Administrator told ADON to write down this encounter for disciplinary action.
Attempts to interview TA K was made on 09/23/2022 at 2:00 PM, Regional Operations Manager also attempted to call TA K at an undisclosed time on 09/23/2022 for an interview he said TA K hung up the telephone and would not speak to the Regional Operations Manager as told to surveyors.
Attempts to interview Charge nurse on 09/23/2022 regarding TA K leaving the facility for 5 hours was made without success in returning telephone calls.
During an interview with the Administrator 09/25/2022 at 2:30 PM, she said Resident #35 came to her and said TA K was telling us on smoke break we were all a bunch of liars, and he would preach about he was tight with God, and we were going to hell and Resident #35 was making up the sexual assault allegation. She said regarding the interview of CNA L, Administrator said because of the sexual abuse allegation there were not to be any discussions about what happened that was why she told her not to take any more calls from TA K. When asked by the surveyors what the Administrator thought about TA K calling the residents liars and preaching, she said she told TA K not to preach to the residents anymore. Administrator added TA K has been terminated.
Review of Email provided by Administrator to Human Resources dated 09/23/2022 at 8:10 AM confirmed termination of TA K.
Review of the Grievances dated 08/28/2022 On 6:30 PM recorded by the Resident Council secretary revealed: during smoke break TA K informed everyone that we were only getting two cigarettes instead of three that we usually get for the last smoke break of the day. When asked why he said we complained about the showers not being given then we were to have our break cut short. Then asked if it was the nurses or the management, he said it was his decision and if we did not like it that we could go in and not go bother to come out for the next smoke break that he would be taking us out on. He told a group since he got in trouble that we were only getting two cigarettes instead of the three. He continues to push the issue about showers so that Resident #7 was the blame for only getting two cigarettes since he complained about the showers . TA K said he was taking us out of the kindness of his heart. TA K continued to argue with Resident #35 and said he was in charge and that what he says is final and if we don't like it, there is the door. It was brought to my attention as Resident Council Secretary by Resident Council President that Resident #35 said when TA K was giving her hugs, he was making a motion as if humping her.
Review of the Grievances dated 09/06/2022 revealed the following:
(Activities Director and Social Worker in attendance and emergency Resident Council meeting was called)
Social Worker -
1. Recognizing and reviewing malicious grievances. Just because you don't like someone is not a reason for a grievance. But if they are threatening you or bullying you or touching you in appropriately or when told not to. This is malicious grievance and should be told to an employee and written up. Harassing is not tolerated in this facility.
2. Only the employees are to call and talk to resident family. No one is to have the phone number It has been brought to the attention that a resident has been calling other resident family unless it's the resident themselves or have the business to call other than the facility or the resident in question. It has been brought to the attention that a resident has been calling other resident family or guardian .
Review of the Grievances dated 09/15/2022 recorded by the Resident Council secretary revealed the following: During the 6:30 PM smoke break. One of the aides said something about the one in purple (Resident #35) thinking it was her (related to sexual assault allegation) Things got heated Then TA K said that at this facility the residents have many real Big Liars Then he started in on a soap box sermon about him and God are like that! And that those liars were going to Hell. The residents here will be struck down. I (resident #38 Resident Council Secretary).
Told the charge nurse and she said that the incident was reported to her. I did not know that all the situation was not reported.
Review of the Grievances dated 09/21/2022 recorded by the R revealed the following: TA K split up the smokers into 2 groups sending out one group. TA K kept stating that the Administrator told him he had to take us out into groups instead of all at once. No one was told of this until we were on our way to the patio. TA K told Resident #8 he could not come outside because he did not have cigarettes. Resident #38 was awakened at 11:30 PM by a loud noise in her room TA K told me If you have any complaints about me (beating his chest) then keep your mouth shut. He then turned to my roommate and asked her if she called the Administrator and report me. She said No. Then he said your neighbor is doing that.
On the same day Resident #35 asked to keep her door open, and TA K yelled and slammed the door shut time was 10:15 PM
During an interview with Administrator on 09/23/2022 at 4:40 PM she said TA K's only had abuse and neglect training completed with no other modules completed at the time of hire.
Review of TA K's hire date provided by the facility was 08/16/2022.
Record review of TA K's disciplinary action dated 08/31/2022 revealed the following: Final Warning- Time clock abuse - Not clocking out (5 hours left the building) contacting employees while investigation is ongoing - contacting and engaging with residents during investigation. Immediate termination if this problem occurs
(Need) to follow command when leaving the building - clocking out when leaving the building - not reaching out to employees or residents when investigation is ongoing.
Review of facility policy and procedure dated June 2021 titled, Abuse Prevention Program revealed the following [in part]:
.2 Our residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation. The includes but is not limited to freedom from corporate punishment involuntary seclusion verbal mental sexual or physical abuses .
5. Our Center will not condone any form of resident abuse or neglect. To aid in abuse prevention, all personnel are to report any signs and symptoms of abuse/neglect to their supervisor and to the Abuse Prevention Coordinator immediately.
6. Our Center will protect residents from harm, reprisal, discriminating or coercion during investigations of abuse allegations.
7. All reports of resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property mistreatment and/or injuries of unknown source shall be promptly reported to local, state, and federal agencies and thoroughly investigated by the Center management. Findings of abuse investigation will also be reported.
8. Our Center will provide protection for the health, welfare and the rights of each resident residing in the Center to ensure the reporting of crimes.
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was identified on 09/23/2022 at 5:10 PM and the Administrator was informed. The IJ Template was provided at this time.
The POR (Plan of Removal) was accepted on 9/24/2022 at 12:40 PM The POR revealed in part:
Preparation and/or execution of this plan do not constitute admission or agreement by the provider that a deficiency exists. This response is also not to be construed as an admission of fault by the facility, its employees, agents, or other individuals who draft or may be discussed in this response and plan of removal.
The facility failed to ensure residents were free from verbal, mental, or sexual abuse.
Action Item:
1. Administrator and the DON were suspended on 9/24/22 pending investigation of incident
2. Review of all resident grievances to identify allegations of abuse; all allegations will be reported timely. All residents will be interviewed for active grievances and allegations of abuse
3. Review of all resident grievances occurs daily Monday through Friday in the morning meeting. Any allegations of abuse/neglect will be reported timely.
4. Resident grievance forms are posted on the walls in wall hangers throughout the center. The resident/representative can leave the form in the file folder outside the administrator's office, with or without signing the form. Resident counsel occurred on 9/24/22, the minutes include the grievance process, how to file an anonymous grievance, who the abuse coordinator is, how to report abuse, zero retaliation policy.
5. Staff interviews to be completed to identify allegations of abuse/neglect. If interviews identify allegations of abuse; all allegations will be reported timely.
6. Staff education on the grievance process to be presented written and verbally. Staff to complete posttest to demonstrate comprehension of material.
7. QA committee will review the POR is effective
8. Safe surveys will be completed with all residents that are interview able; responsible parties will be phone interviewed for all residents that are un-interview able and those residents will be assessed for signs of physical or psychosocial distress.
9. TA K has been terminated as of 9/22/22 and Activity Director will be suspended pending investigation on 9/23/22.
10. Physical and emotional assessments to be completed on all residents. Change of condition events to be completed as identified. The event includes physician and family/responsible parties. Notifications. The Medical Director and resident physicians were notified of the immediate jeopardy on 9/24/22.
11. Employee TA K has notified that he not allowed on property by the Regional Director of Operations on 9/24/22. Staff education completed on terminated employee TA not being allowed on property and to notify Regional Director of Operations and police if former staff member attempts to enter center to be presented written and verbally. Staff to complete posttest to demonstrate comprehension of material.
Staff interviews to be completed to identify allegations of abuse/neglect. If interviews identify allegations of abuse; all allegations will be reported timely.
Regional Director of Operations on 9/24/22 at 2:30 pm initiated education of employees. All will be completed by end of today except for one staff member who is out of state, another is on a second job. Will not be allowed to return to work until training is completed.
Observation and interview with Regional Operations Manager 0n 09/25/2022 at 2:40 pm revealed signs related to Resident Council Minuets were posted in the lobby, 2 hallways and behind the glass board. Grievance forms were in the lobby area in a hanging file with signage. Grievance forms were placed in the box outside the Administrators door or can hand it to any department heads.
Observation on 09/24/22 at 4:00 pm revealed Regional Operations Director conducting a Resident Council Meeting. He went over the grievance process, how to file a grievance and who the Grievance officer was.
Interviewed the following residents on 9/24/2022 at 5:00 pm Resident #20, #31, #11, and #5, (all went to the Resident Council meeting), discussion included how to file a grievance, name of the grievance officer, and retaliation. One resident who did not attend the Resident Council meeting due to being on Transmission Based Precautions said staff came in and educated him on abuse and how to file a grievance.
Interview with LVN C on 09/24/22 at 3:00 pm (day shift)stated she had an In-service this morning before she started work. She said she had another one at approx. 10:00 am and another one at 12:30 pm. In services were with ROM and MDS Nurse and BOM. She said in-services were about abuse and reporting abuse and she completed a written test.
Interview with Housekeeping Supervisor on 09/24/22 at 3:10 pm (day shift)stated she had was in-service at 8:00 am and at 9:30 am by ROM and MDS Nurse. Housekeeping Supervisor Stated she in-services her employees this morning.
Interview Housekeeper and Laundry Aide on 09/24/22 at 3:20 pm (day shift) said they were educated this morning by Housekeeping Supervisor on how to report abuse.
Observation on 09/24/22 at 3:30 pm revealed, Business office Manager (BOM) in-servicing, LVN B and Home care 1 on (day shift) concerning Regional [NAME] President was acting Abuse Coordinator and how to report abuse, etc.
Interview, with CNA F on 09/24/22 at 3:35 pm (day shift)stated she received education concerning how to recognize abuse and how to report it earlier this morning after the residents had breakfast. All staff educated by ROM took a written test scoring 80% or greater. Observation at 3:37pm revealed ROM educate CNA F concerning the Regional Operations Manager (ROM) is the abuse coordinator and how to report abuse.
Interview with LVN B on 09/24/22 at 3:40 pm (day shift)stated she received training this morning shortly after she came to work his morning. The training was conducted by ROM. The training consisted of abuse, how to identify abuse and report it and took a written test.
Interview with LVN D on 09/24/22 at 8:44 pm (night shift) said she was trained before shift by the BOM. The training consisted of abuse, how to identify and report abuse, who the abuse coordinator was and took a written test.
Interview with CNA I on 09/24/22 at 8:56 pm said she was trained before shift by the BOM. The training consisted of abuse, how to identify and report abuse, who the abuse coordinator was and took a written test.
Interview with LVN A on 09/24/22 at 9:00 pm said she was trained before shift by the BOM. The Training consisted of abuse, how to identify and report abuse, who the abuse coordinator was and took a written test.
Staff Social Worker, CMA and PT (who are out of town and/or out of the country) will be interview regarding abuse and neglect prior to their shift.
The Regional Operations Director, Administrator, DON, ADON, and Corporate Nurse were informed the Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 09/25/22 at 12:40 p.m. The facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of 2 with a scope of pattern due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems that were put into place.
CRITICAL
(K)
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Investigate Abuse
(Tag F0610)
Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to fully investigate, prevent, and correct an alleged vio...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to fully investigate, prevent, and correct an alleged violations of abuse and neglect for 4 (Resident #7, #8, #23, and #38,) of 21 on the North Hall and 2 (Resident #30 and #35) of 17 on the South Hall.
The facility did not thoroughly investigate and correct an allegations of abuse that resulted in Resident #7, #8, #9, #23, 30, #35, and #38 causing psycho social harm and fearby TA K, while allowing him to continue working with residents in the facility.
The Administrator and DON failed to provide residents necessary protection from staff member (TA K) who was threatening physical and verbal abuse in retaliation against residents who alleged incidents of his abusive behavior
On 09/23/22 at 5:10 pm an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified. While the IJ was removed on 09/25/22 at 12:30 pm, the facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy with a scope of pattern due to the facility continuing to monitor the implementation and effectiveness of their plan of removal. The facility Administrator received the IJ template on 09/25/22 at 12:30 PM.
This failure could place residents at risk of verbal, mental and physical abuse, neglect and mental anguish.
Findings include:
Resident #38
Record review of Resident #38's undated face sheet revealed she was a [AGE] year-old-female admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of necrotizing fasciitis (flesh eating bacteria), cellulitis of the lower limb, hypokalemia, abscess of the mouth, nausea vomiting, chronic diarrhea and pain in right toe.
Record review of Resident #38's MDS re-admission dated 05/26/2022 revealed she had a BIMS (brief interview for memory status) of 15 indicating she was cognitively intact and able to make her needs known. Section G (functional status) revealed she required supervision for personal hygiene.
Record review of Resident #38's Care Plan dated 05/22/2022 revealed she was at risk for falls, weight loss due to chronic diarrhea, and use of anti-depressant medication.
Record review of Resident #38's physician orders dated 05/28/2022 initial orders revealed the following medications: Cymbalta 60 milligram (anti-depressant) 1 tablet a daily for depression.
During initial tour of the facility on 09/20/22 at 9:35 AM, interview with Resident #38 asked the surveyor what she should do if a staff member threatened her for being a tattle tale. She said she would explain in further detail, but she was on her way to an outing with the activity director and fellow residents and would explain later.
During an interview on 09/21/2022 at 8:00 AM, Resident #38 said TA K worked last night and told her that the state was in the building and that if she told on him (regarding the verbal abuse) it was going to be bad for her (threaten retribution) . She said it was an ongoing issue because of the problems he initially had with the smokers and the complaints against him regarding not giving showers and the allegation of being sexually inappropriate with Resident #35. She said she was afraid of him because of his behaviors, he yells at residents and slams doors and enter rooms without knocking. She said he worked last night (09/20/2022 6:00 PM to 09/21/2022 to 6:00 AM) and told her these things. She said she was told to sign the questionnaire when the thing with Resident #35 came up (sexual abuse allegation) but did not feel comfortable with it.
During an interview 09/21/2022 at 8:10 AM with Resident #38's roommate ( Resident #9) who participates in the smoking area was alert and oriented times three (aware of person place and time). said she witnessed TA K making threatening remarks when he came into their room during his shift ( 09/20/2022 6:00 PM to 09/21/2022 to 6:00 AM)(but in the morning-unsure of the exact time) and accused Resident #9 of telling on him (regarding to the showers, and verbal abuse) and when Resident #9 said she did not tell on him, he then accused Resident #38 and said he would get her. Resident #38 understood TA K threatened to physically assault her.
During an interview on 09/22/2022 at 2:00 PM with Resident #38, while she was on the telephone with her mother, her mother told the surveyor she was aware of the threats Resident #38 was receiving from TA K and hoped the surveyor will help resolve the threats she was receiving him (from TA K).
Resident #35
Record review of Resident #35's undated face sheet revealed she was a [AGE] year-old-female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of: hypertension, heart failure, thrombosis of other thoracic veins (blood clot in thoracic vein), Weakness, Other muscle spasm, and need for assistance with personal care.
Review of Resident #35's annual MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #35 had a BIMS of 15 indicating she was cognitively intact and able to make her needs known. Section G (Functional Status) revealed she required extensive assistance with dressing, bathing, toilet use and hygiene with one person assistance.
Review of Resident #35's Care Plan dated 08/21/2022 revealed resident had communication difficulty, at risk for pressure ulcers, utilize wheelchair for mobility, risk for falls and morbidly obese.
Review of the facility's Incident Report dated 08/31/2022 revealed the following: Sexual assault allegation reported by resident (Resident #35) Resident stated male CNA (TA K) hugged her and made a humping movement rubbed his penis against her arms. Resident said she told male CNA (TA K) to stop. Male CNA (TA K) suspended until further notice pending investigation of allegation of sexual assault allegations . Authorities notified .
Review of Police Report (undated report case #22-02928) revealed Insufficient evidence to substantiate the assault and the State Agency investigator did not find sufficient evidence to substantiate the allegation. Resident #35 disputed their findings and feared TA K.
During Resident Council meeting on 09/21/2022 at 10:15 AM, 14 residents attended, Resident #35 was the president of the council (preceding over the meeting). Residents 6 of (14) expressed grievances regarding TA K because he said he would only give out two cigarettes due to the residents complaining about him about showers. The said he told the residents on the smoke break he can do whatever he wanted to and when he gives out the cigarettes for the breaks even though three cigarettes were giving on other breaks. Several (4 on the north hall) residents said TA K would go up and down the hall and slam doors, yell at residents and just walk into rooms without knocking and especially when the ladies were dressing. Surveyor asked residents attending the Resident Council Meeting how many people were afraid of TA, 9 residents held up their hands including Resident #7, #,8, #23, #35 and #38 (4 others did not wish to be identified).
Resident #8
Review of Resident #8's undated face sheet revealed she was a [AGE] year-old-female re-admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of: bipolar disorder, gout (excessive uric acid collected in joints), pain in ankle and foot, insomnia (difficulty sleeping).
Review of Resident #8's last assessed MDS dated [DATE] revealed she had a BIMS score of 12 indicating she was moderately cognitively impaired but able to make her needs known. Section G (Function Status) revealed she needed set up and supervision with personal hygiene.
Review of Resident #8's Care Plan dated 10/11/2018 revealed to participate in activities, risk for falls due to safety awareness, and chronic illness due to lupus (autoimmune syndrome).
During interview on 09/22/2022 at 10:50 AM Resident #8 said, TA K would yell at the residents and would bump into them inappropriately hugging them. She said she was afraid of TA K; he had a habit of coming into women's room not knocking when he knew they were dressing. She said she was afraid of him because he was always threatening the residents in one way or another (unspecific regarding threats). She said she was told to sign the questionnaire (about Resident #35's sexual assault allegation and if they felt safe) and was uncomfortable about being identified.
During an interview on 09/22/2022 at 2:20 PM with Resident #8's family member, (son) said she mentioned the inappropriate behavior TA K displayed (inappropriate hugging, yelling at residents, slamming doors making threatening comments) and he was in the process of getting her moved out.
Resident #23
Review of Resident #23's undated face sheet revealed she was a [AGE] year-old-female re-admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of: Displaced fracture of base of neck of left femur, Overactive bladder, Pneumonia, abnormalities of gait and mobility.
Review of Resident #23's Initial MDS dated [DATE] revealed she had a BIMS score of 14 indicating she was cognitively intact and able to make her needs known. Section G (Function Status) revealed she required extensive assistance with personal hygiene.
Review of Resident #23's Care Plan dated 08/10/2022 revealed she was at risk for pressure ulcers and at risk for anemia.
During an interview with Resident #23 on 09/22/2022 at 11:05 AM, she said TA K came one night to change her and told her we need to make love. She said she told him that was a very inappropriate statement. She said, he said she misunderstood him and changed her brief. She said he made her very uncomfortable, and she was lucky she only needed to be changed one time. She said her family member, Resident #32 (lives in same room) said he did not hear the conversation, but TA K goes down the hall and yells and was very loud.
Resident #30
Review of Resident #30's undated face sheet revealed he was a [AGE] year-old-male admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of: Malignant neoplasm of bronchus or lung (Admission), anxiety disorder, Pain, and displaced fracture of surgical neck of left humerus.
Review of Resident #30's MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS of 3 indicating he was severely cognitively impaired. Section G (Function Status) revealed he required extensive assistance for personal hygiene.
During one-on-one interview with Resident #30 on 09/23/2022 3:00 PM, he stated he was familiar with TA K, and he worked the night shift. He stated he was uncomfortable around him and felt intimidated. He stated he would rather stay wet than ask him for help because he could tell it (changing his briefs from an incontinent episode) made TA K mad. He stated no one else made him feel that way. He stated TA K acted mad and smarted off to us when he took the smokers out to smoke. He stated he could not remember what he said but he knew TA K made him feel bad He could not remember a specific date or time.
Resident #7
Review of Resident #7's undated face sheet revealed he was a [AGE] year-old-male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of: Chronic pain due to trauma, Anorexia nervosa, binge eating/purging type, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, Tachycardia, Gastro-esophageal reflux disease with esophagitis, Heart failure, disorder of thyroid, Vascular dementia with behavior disturbances.
Review of Resident #7's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed he had a BIMS score of 15 indicating he was cognitively intact and able to make his needs known. Section G (Functional Section) revealed he required extensive assistance for personal hygiene.
During an interview with Resident #7 on 09/22/2022 at 2:45 PM, he said he was always arguing with TA K because he always made a fuss about changing him. He said he called him a bitch and not being a man because Resident #7 needed someone to change him. (Resident #7 said no use to complaining because no one does anything about it. He said they (residents) complain about TA K, but nothing is done (Resident Council grievances)
During an interview with the Administrator and DON on 09/22/2022 at 11:40 AM, they said they must find out what was going on. The Administrator said she found out TA K left one night and went home around 11:00 PM (disciplinary documentation stated date of incident 08/31/2022) and was missing for 5 hours. The Administrator said human resources (corporate) told Administrator and DON they had the options of terminating him or counsel him and allow him to return to work. She said we were given that options. The DON said the Aide who worked with him said he left for 5 hours and fell asleep at home. The Administrator said HR (human resources) told them it was clear cut reason to terminate him, but we were given the option of counseling him. The Administrator and DON stated they chose to allow him to return to work.
Interview with the Activity Director on 09/22/2022 at 12:15 PM, said she was aware of the problems the residents who participates in the smoke breaks during the smoke breaks (#7, #8, #9 #35, and #38 and four more not willing to be identified) was having with TA (transition assistant) and has given the Resident Council minutes to the ADON (resident council minutes and grievances were reviewed by surveyor prior to the Resident Council meeting on 09/21/2022 at 10:15 AM) and they discuss the problem in the stand-up meetings (morning meeting of facility department heads). She said they counseled him and let him come back. She said she has no influence on who to hire or fire. She said, all I can do is make the Administrator know.
During an interview with Resident #38 on 09/22/2022 at 12:35 PM, said the call lights will turn on and a light will come on outside the room, but the alarm will not come on. Resident #38 resides on the hall where TA K works.
Resident #38 said because the call lights would not sound, he TA K could be verbally and mentally abusive.
Resident #38 said because of the sexual abuse allegation TA K had to work on the North Hall the call lights would not sound he TA K could be threatening, yell at the resident slam doors and threaten them.
Observation of Resident #38's Call light being turned on 09/22/2022 at 12:35 PM revealed the light outside of her room coming on but not audible sound coming on.
Observation on 09/23/2022 at 9:30 AM alarm system was checked on the North Hall, in the center of the hall a switch could be turn off and on. When the switch was in the Off position, the audio alarm did not activate when the resident activated the call light system in their room. When the switch was in the on position, the audio alarm sounded when the call light was activated by the resident.
Resident #38 said because the call lights would not sound, he TA K could be verbally and mentally abusive.
During an interview with ADON on 09/22/2022 at 4:35 PM, she said she has never been given any of the grievances or Resident Council minutes by the Activities Director and has not been aware of residents being threatened.
During an interview with the Administrator on 09/23/2022 at 10:40 AM, surveyor asked if she was aware of the complaints from the residents, that they were being threatened by TA K. She said this was the first time she heard about the complaints and never received any of the Resident Council Minutes or grievances. Administrator was told by the survey team.
During interview with CNA I on 09/23/2022 at 3:00 PM, she said she was working the South Hall and noticed the call light panel going off for residents on the North Hall. She said TA K was only allowed to work the North Hall because of the allegations of sexual abuse alleged by Resident #35. She said she went to the North Hall and noticed several call lights on and took care of the residents. She said she then texted TA K and asked where he was, she said he wrote back and said he went home and fell asleep. She said he said he will be back. She said he did not come back untill 5 AM in the morning. She said he threatened her if she told anyone. CNA I was unspecific about the threat but noticed someone was trying to vandalize her car the next night She called the Administrator who said not to take any more calls from him.
Record review revealed inappropriate behavior dated 09/21/2022 at 6:00 AM ADON confronted TA K regarding his charting .he did not give a fuck about charting the point of care in the computer, and they would not be done. She said she asked him to discuss the matter with her and he said, he did not have to talk to her . The Administrator told ADON to write down this encounter for disciplinary action.
Attempts to interview TA K was made on 09/23/2022 at 2:00 PM, Regional Operations Manager also attempted to call TA K at an undisclosed time on 09/23/2022 for an interview he said TA K hung up the telephone and would not speak to the Regional Operations Manager as told to surveyors.
Attempts to interview Charge nurse on 09/23/2022 regarding TA K leaving the facility for 5 hours was made without success in returning telephone calls.
During an interview with the Administrator 09/25/2022 at 2:30 PM, she said Resident #35 came to her and said TA K was telling us on smoke break we were all a bunch of liars, and he would preach about he was tight with God, and we were going to hell and Resident #35 was making up the sexual assault allegation. She said regarding the interview of CNA L, Administrator said because of the sexual abuse allegation there were not to be any discussions about what happened that was why she told her not to take any more calls from TA K. When asked by the surveyors what the Administrator thought about TA K calling the residents liars and preaching, she said she told TA K not to preach to the residents anymore. Administrator added TA K has been terminated.
Review of Email provided by Administrator to Human Resources dated 09/23/2022 at 8:10 AM confirmed termination of TA K.
Review of the Grievances dated 08/28/2022 On 6:30 PM recorded by the Resident Council secretary revealed: during smoke break TA K informed everyone that we were only getting two cigarettes instead of three that we usually get for the last smoke break of the day. When asked why he said we complained about the showers not being given then we were to have our break cut short. Then asked if it was the nurses or the management, he said it was his decision and if we did not like it that we could go in and not go bother to come out for the next smoke break that he would be taking us out on. He told a group since he got in trouble that we were only getting two cigarettes instead of the three. He continues to push the issue about showers so that Resident #7 was the blame for only getting two cigarettes since he complained about the showers . TA K said he was taking us out of the kindness of his heart. TA K continued to argue with Resident #35 and said he was in charge and that what he says is final and if we don't like it, there is the door. It was brought to my attention as Resident Council Secretary by Resident Council President that Resident #35 said when TA K was giving her hugs, he was making a motion as if humping her.
Review of the Grievances dated 09/06/2022 revealed the following:
(Activities Director and Social Worker in attendance and emergency Resident Council meeting was called)
Social Worker -
1. Recognizing and reviewing malicious grievances. Just because you don't like someone is not a reason for a grievance. But if they are threatening you or bullying you or touching you in appropriately or when told not to. This is malicious grievance and should be told to an employee and written up. Harassing is not tolerated in this facility.
2. Only the employees are to call and talk to resident family. No one is to have the phone number It has been brought to the attention that a resident has been calling other resident family unless it's the resident themselves or have the business to call other than the facility or the resident in question. It has been brought to the attention that a resident has been calling other resident family or guardian .
Review of the Grievances dated 09/15/2022 recorded by the Resident Council secretary revealed the following: During the 6:30 PM smoke break. One of the aides said something about the one in purple (Resident #35) thinking it was her (related to sexual assault allegation) Things got heated Then TA K said that at this facility the residents have many real Big Liars Then he started in on a soap box sermon about him and God are like that! And that those liars were going to Hell. The residents here will be struck down. I (resident #38 Resident Council Secretary).
Told the charge nurse and she said that the incident was reported to her. I did not know that all the situation was not reported.
Review of the Grievances dated 09/21/2022 recorded by the R revealed the following: TA K split up the smokers into 2 groups sending out one group. TA K kept stating that the Administrator told him he had to take us out into groups instead of all at once. No one was told of this until we were on our way to the patio. TA K told Resident #8 he could not come outside because he did not have cigarettes. Resident #38 was awakened at 11:30 PM by a loud noise in her room TA K told me If you have any complaints about me (beating his chest) then keep your mouth shut. He then turned to my roommate and asked her if she called the Administrator and report me. She said No. Then he said your neighbor is doing that.
On the same day Resident #35 asked to keep her door open, and TA K yelled and slammed the door shut time was 10:15 PM
During an interview with Administrator on 09/23/2022 at 4:40 PM she said TA K's only had abuse and neglect training completed with no other modules completed at the time of hire.
Review of TA K's hire date provided by the facility was 08/16/2022.
Record review of TA K's disciplinary action dated 08/31/2022 revealed the following: Final Warning- Time clock abuse - Not clocking out (5 hours left the building) contacting employees while investigation is ongoing - contacting and engaging with residents during investigation. Immediate termination if this problem occurs
(Need) to follow command when leaving the building - clocking out when leaving the building - not reaching out to employees or residents when investigation is ongoing.
Review of facility policy and procedure dated June 2021 titled, Abuse Prevention Program revealed the following [in part]:
.2 Our residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation. The includes but is not limited to freedom from corporate punishment involuntary seclusion verbal mental sexual or physical abuses .
5. Our Center will not condone any form of resident abuse or neglect. To aid in abuse prevention, all personnel are to report any signs and symptoms of abuse/neglect to their supervisor and to the Abuse Prevention Coordinator immediately.
6. Our Center will protect residents from harm, reprisal, discriminating or coercion during investigations of abuse allegations.
7. All reports of resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property mistreatment and/or injuries of unknown source shall be promptly reported to local, state, and federal agencies and thoroughly investigated by the Center management. Findings of abuse investigation will also be reported.
8. Our Center will provide protection for the health, welfare and the rights of each resident residing in the Center to ensure the reporting of crimes.
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was identified on 09/23/2022 at 5:10 PM and the administrator was informed. The IJ template was provided at this time.
The POR (Plan of Removal) was accepted on 9/24/2022 at 12:40 PM The POR revealed in part:
Preparation and/or execution of this plan do not constitute admission or agreement by the provider that a deficiency exists. This response is also not to be construed as an admission of fault by the facility, its employees, agents, or other individuals who draft or may be discussed in this response and plan of removal.
The facility failed to ensure residents were free from verbal, mental, or sexual abuse.
Action Item:
1. Administrator and the DON were suspended on 9/24/22 pending investigation of incident
2. Review of all resident grievances to identify allegations of abuse; all allegations will be reported timely. All residents will be interviewed for active grievances and allegations of abuse
3. Review of all resident grievances occurs daily Monday through Friday in the morning meeting. Any allegations of abuse/neglect will be reported timely.
4. Resident grievance forms are posted on the walls in wall hangers throughout the center. The resident/representative can leave the form in the file folder outside the administrator's office, with or without signing the form. Resident counsel occurred on 9/24/22, the minutes include the grievance process, how to file an anonymous grievance, who the abuse coordinator is, how to report abuse, zero retaliation policy.
5. Staff interviews to be completed to identify allegations of abuse/neglect. If interviews identify allegations of abuse; all allegations will be reported timely.
6. Staff education on the grievance process to be presented written and verbally. Staff to complete posttest to demonstrate comprehension of material.
7. QA committee will review the POR is effective
8. Safe surveys will be completed with all residents that are interview able; responsible parties will be phone interviewed for all residents that are un-interview able and those residents will be assessed for signs of physical or psychosocial distress.
9. TA K has been terminated as of 9/22/22 and Activity Director will be suspended pending investigation on 9/23/22.
10. Physical and emotional assessments to be completed on all residents. Change of condition events to be completed as identified. The event includes physician and family/responsible parties. Notifications. The Medical Director and resident physicians were notified of the immediate jeopardy on 9/24/22.
11. Employee TA K has notified that he not allowed on property by the Regional Director of Operations on 9/24/22. Staff education completed on terminated employee TA not being allowed on property and to notify Regional Director of Operations and police if former staff member attempts to enter center to be presented written and verbally. Staff to complete posttest to demonstrate comprehension of material.
Staff interviews to be completed to identify allegations of abuse/neglect. If interviews identify allegations of abuse; all allegations will be reported timely.
Regional Director of Operations on 9/24/22 at 2:30 pm initiated education of employees. All will be completed by end of today except for one staff member who is out of state, another is on a second job. Will not be allowed to return to work until training is completed.
Observation and interview with Regional Operations Manager 0n 09/25/2022 at 2:40 pm revealed signs related to Resident Council Minuets were posted in the lobby, 2 hallways and behind the glass board. Grievance forms were in the lobby area in a hanging file with signage. Grievance forms were placed in the box outside the Administrators door or can hand it to any department heads.
Observation on 09/24/22 at 4:00 pm revealed Regional Operations Director conducting a Resident Council Meeting. He went over the grievance process, how to file a grievance and who the Grievance officer was.
Interviewed the following residents on 9/24/2022 at 5:00 pm Resident #20, #31, #11, and #5, (all went to the Resident Council meeting), discussion included how to file a grievance, name of the grievance officer, and retaliation. One resident who did not attend the Resident Council meeting due to being on Transmission Based Precautions said staff came in and educated him on abuse and how to file a grievance.
Interview with LVN C on 09/24/22 at 3:00 pm (day shift)stated she had an In-service this morning before she started work. She said she had another one at approx. 10:00 am and another one at 12:30 pm. In services were with ROM and MDS Nurse and BOM. She said in-services were about abuse and reporting abuse and she completed a written test.
Interview with Housekeeping Supervisor on 09/24/22 at 3:10 pm (day shift)stated she had was in-service at 8:00 am and at 9:30 am by ROM and MDS Nurse. Housekeeping Supervisor Stated she in-services her employees this morning.
Interview Housekeeper and Laundry Aide on 09/24/22 at 3:20 pm (day shift) said they were educated this morning by Housekeeping Supervisor on how to report abuse.
Observation on 09/24/22 at 3:30 pm revealed, Business office Manager (BOM) in-servicing, LVN B and Home care 1 on (day shift) concerning Regional [NAME] President was acting Abuse Coordinator and how to report abuse, etc.
Interview, with CNA F on 09/24/22 at 3:35 pm (day shift)stated she received education concerning how to recognize abuse and how to report it earlier this morning after the residents had breakfast. All staff educated by ROM took a written test scoring 80% or greater. Observation at 3:37pm revealed ROM educate CNA F concerning the Regional Operations Manager (ROM) is the abuse coordinator and how to report abuse.
Interview with LVN B on 09/24/22 at 3:40 pm (day shift)stated she received training this morning shortly after she came to work his morning. The training was conducted by ROM. The training consisted of abuse, how to identify abuse and report it and took a written test.
Interview with LVN D on 09/24/22 at 8:44 pm (night shift) said she was trained before shift by the BOM. The training consisted of abuse, how to identify and report abuse, who the abuse coordinator was and took a written test.
Interview with CNA I on 09/24/22 at 8:56 pm said she was trained before shift by the BOM. The training consisted of abuse, how to identify and report abuse, who the abuse coordinator was and took a written test.
Interview with LVN A on 09/24/22 at 9:00 pm said she was trained before shift by the BOM. The Training consisted of abuse, how to identify and report abuse, who the abuse coordinator was and took a written test.
Staff Social Worker, CMA and PT (who are out of town and/or out of the country) will be interview regarding abuse and neglect prior to their shift.
The Regional Operations Director, Administrator, DON, ADON, and Corporate Nurse were informed the Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 09/25/22 at 12:40 p.m. The facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of 2 with a scope of pattern due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems that were put into place.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
PASARR Coordination
(Tag F0644)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all pre-admission screening and resident review (PASRR) prog...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all pre-admission screening and resident review (PASRR) program, for 1 of 2 residents (Residents #30) reviewed for PASRR evaluations.
The facility failed to accurately complete the PASRR 1012 form for Resident # 30.
This failure could affect residents with psychiatric diagnoses who may not be evaluated and receive needed PASRR services.
The findings included:
Review of Resident# 30's Face Sheet revealed she was an [AGE] year-old female originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had a most recent date of 8/25/21. Resident 301's diagnoses included: Dementia with behavioral disturbances (onset 12/28/20) schizophrenia (onset 7/31/21), anxiety disorder (6/11/20), and major depressive disorder recurrent (0nset3/25/20) Other specified Depressive Disorders, Post Traumatic Stress Disorder and Anxiety Disorder.
Review of a Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #30 could usually understand others and was usually understood by others; had severe cognitive impairment with a BIMS of 3, no mood or behavior concerns were indicated.
Review of Resident #30's Physician Orders dated 9//24/2022 revealed an order for mirtazapine; (15mg, amt: 1; oral, at bedtime; for Major Depressive disorder single episode), trazadone; (50mg, amt: 1; oral, at bedtime for insomnia), and Seroquel; (50mg, amt: 1; oral, at bedtime for hallucinations)
Review of Resident #30's Care Plan dated 8/30/2022 revealed complications associated with psychotropic medications and to monitor for target behaviors, there was no mental health or PASRR areas care planned.
Review of Resident #1's PASRR Level One Screening Forms dated 1/5/21 revealed Resident # 1012 form was not completed or submitted.
Review of records Resident #30's form 10 12 was completed and signed by the physician on 9/22/22.
Interview with the DON on 9/22/2022 at 10:39 AM, revealed that PASRR and 1012 forms are completed by the MDS Coordinator. The expectations were for forms, including 1012 forms, to be updated immediately after being identified or an acute clinical change. This would ensure that the resident would receive the services he/she needs. The risk of not doing it would be a delay in mental health services that could produce a negative outcome for the resident.
In an interview on 9/22/22 04:18 PM the MDS Nurse stated she was the MDS Nurse for two facilities. She then viewed the LTC portal and stated that a PE had not been done. She stated she did not know why the resident had not had a PASSR level 2 done. She stated the company has an MDS Consultant that usually reviews diagnoses for changes. She stated she will email her LMHA to complete a PE. She has not done a form 1012 and was not familiar with the process. She stated she took PASSAR training modules and a MDS 3.0 Course as training. She had no prior experience as an MDS nurse before starting this position in November.
Record review of the facility's policy, Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) revised on 5/21/22 stated that
3. A resident with MI or ID/DD must have a resident review conducted when there is a significant change in the resident's condition. The nursing facility is required to notify the LIDS or the LMHA.
a. The CCM must ensure the 1012 form is completed.
b. Please note the 1012 may only be signed by the physician if the person has a diagnosis of dementia or does not have an MI.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0726
(Tag F0726)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure nurse aides are able to demonstrate appropriate competencies...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure nurse aides are able to demonstrate appropriate competencies and skills sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident for TA K who was 1 of 9 (CNA F, CNA G, CNA H, CNA I, CNA L, CNA M, CNA N, TA O) CNAs, and [NAME] reviewed.
TA K (Training Aide) was not trained in the competency in skills and techniques necessary to care for residents' needs.
This failure could place residents requiring incontinent care at risk for the spread of infections, skin breakdown, and decreased quality of life.
Findings included:
Record Review of the Personnel Files for TA K (Training Aide) revealed a hire date of 08/02/22. Record Review of staffing sheets for the months of August 2022 and September 2022 revealed TA K worked on 08/22/22, 08/23/22, 08/27/22, 08/28/22, 09/14/22, 09/15/22, 09/19/22, and 09/20/22. TA Ks (Training Aide) duties were to provide direct resident care which included providing ADL care (Activities of Daily Living) Review of TA K's training revealed he only had abuse and neglect completed with no other modules completed at the time of hire. There was no competency checks of skills or record of the TA training completed for TA K.
Interview on 09/25/22 at 9:30 AM, the Administrator said there were required modules that must be completed by each employee prior to them providing any form of resident care and the training records were in the employee's personnel file.
Interview on 09/25/22 at 10:30 AM, the DON stated, all employee training was in the personnel file and certain modules must be completed before the employee hits the floor.
Interview on 09/25/22 at 10:30 AM, the BOM stated, I've only been employed here a week and I have not been through all of the files.
Record review of the facility's Competency of Nursing Staff Policy with a revision date of May 2019 indicated the following [In-part]:
1. All nursing staff must meet the specific competency requirements of their respective licensure and certification requirements defined by State law.
2. In addition, licensed nurses and nursing assistants employed (or contracted) by the facility will:
participate in a facility-specific, competency-based staff development and training program; and
demonstrate specific competencies and skill sets deemed necessary to care for the needs of residents, as identified through resident assessments and described in the plans of care.
3. The facility assessment includes an evaluation of the staff competencies that are necessary to provide the level and types of care specific to the resident population.
4. Competency in skills and techniques necessary to care for residents' needs includes but is not limited to competencies in areas such as:
Preventing abuse, neglect, and exploitation of resident property.
Dementia management.
Resident rights.
Person centered care.
Communication.
Basic nursing skills.
Basic restorative services.
Skin and wound care.
Medication management.
Pain management.
Infection control.
Identification of changes in condition; and
5. Training and competency evaluations include elements of critical thinking and processes necessary to identify and report resident changes of condition. The type and amount of this training is based on the facility assessment and is specific to the different skill levels and licensure of staff. For example, CNAs are trained for and evaluated on competency in identifying and reporting resident changes of condition to the LPN or RN, while LPNs and RNs are trained for and evaluated on managing and reporting pertinent findings to the provider.
6. Facility and resident-specific competency evaluations will be conducted upon hire, annually and as deemed necessary based on the facility assessment.
7. Facility and resident-specific competency evaluations will include:
Lecture with return demonstration for physical activities.
A pre-and post-test for documentation issues.
Demonstrated ability to use tools, devices, or equipment used to care for residents.
Reviewing adverse events that occurred as an indication of gaps in competency; or
Demonstrated ability to perform activities that are within the scope of practice an individual is licensed or certified to perform.
8. Competency demonstrations will be evaluated based on the staff member's ability to use and integrate knowledge and skills obtained in training, which will be evaluated by staff already deemed competent in that skill or knowledge.
9. Inquiries concerning staff competency evaluations should be referred to the Director of Nursing Services or to the Personnel Director.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents with PRN orders for psychotropic drugs were l...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents with PRN orders for psychotropic drugs were limited to 14 days for 1 (Resident#30) of 21 residents whose medication regimens were reviewed in that:
Resident #30's order for PRN Lorazepam (antianxiety medication) was not discontinued after 14 days.
This failure could place residents administered PRN psychotropic medications at risk of adverse side effects from prolonged use of psychotropic medications including stroke and death.
Findings Included:
Resident #30
Review of Resident #30's face sheet not dated revealed that he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was [AGE] years old.
Review of Resident #30's CCD dated 9/25/22 revealed that he had diagnoses including anxiety disorder, displaced fracture or left humerus, malignant neoplasm of lung, and muscle weakness.
Review of Resident #30's significant change MDS dated [DATE] documented in part that he had a BIMS score of 3 (Severe Cognitive Impairment). During the seven-day look-back period he had not received anti-anxiety medications. No behavioral symptoms were documented.
Review of Resident #30's pharmacy consultant reviews for September did not reveal to the consultant pharmacist recommended that the resident's order for Lorazepam be discontinued because the 14-day maximum allowed prescribed length for prn psychotrophic medications had been met.
Review of Resident #30's Physician Orders dated 03/20/22 revealed that the resident was to continue receiving lorazepam 2mg every 3 hours PRN, lorazepam 1 mg q 2 hours prn, and there was also another order for lorazepam 1 mg every 2 hours prn for anxiety dated 3/15/ 22. The orders did not specify a stop date.
Review of Resident #30's Medication administration records dated 8/1/22 through 8/24/22 and 8/25 through 9/24/22 did not reveal any documentation of prn lorazepam 0.5, mg, 1 mg or the 2mg tablets as given.
Record review of the progress notes dated 8/1/22 through 8/24/22 and 8/25 through 9/24/22 did not reveal any documentation of prn lorazepam 0.5, mg, 1 mg or the 2mg tablets as given.
Review of Resident #30's narcotic control drug sheet revealed the lorazepam 2mg tablets had been given on 8/1/22 and 8/7/22.
In an interview on 9/23/22 at 3:42 PM, Assistant Director of Nurses stated that PRN orders for psychotropic medications were to be discontinued after 14 days and that justification from the prescriber was required for PRN orders for psychotropic medications that extended beyond the 14-day limit. She stated she did not know why the lorazepam continued to be ordered as a prn medication. She stated the nurses, ADON and DON were responsible to see that prn psychotrophic medication were not administered prn longer than 14 days.
Review of the facility policy titled Behavioral Assessment, Intervention and Monitoring and Antipsychotic Medication Use revised September 2019 stated in part:
3. The facility will comply with regulatory requirements related to the use of medications to manage behavioral symptoms.
8. Interventions and approaches will be based on a detailed assessment of physical, psychological and behavioral symptoms and their underlying causes, as well as the potential situational and environmental reasons for the behavior. The care plan will include, as a minimum:
a. A description of the behavioral symptoms, including:
(1) Frequency;
(2) Intensity;
(3) Duration;
(4) Outcomes;
(5) Location;
(6) Environment; and
(7) Precipitating factors or situations.
b. Targeted and individualized interventions for the behavioral and/or psychosocial symptoms;
c. The rationale for the interventions and approaches;
d. Specific and measurable goals for targeted behaviors; and
e. How the staff will monitor for effectiveness of the interventions.
9. Non-pharmacologic approaches will be utilized to the extent possible to avoid or reduce the use of antipsychotic medications to manage behavioral symptoms.
10. When medications are prescribed for behavioral symptoms, documentation will include:
a. Rationale for use;
b. Potential underlying causes of the behavior;
c. Other approaches and interventions tried prior to the use of antipsychotic medications;
d. Potential risks and benefits of medications as discussed with the resident and/or family;
e. Specific target behaviors and expected outcomes;
f. Dosage;
g. Duration;
h. Monitoring for efficacy and adverse consequences; and
i. Plans (if applicable) for gradual dose reduction.
11. The Director of Nursing, or designee, will evaluate whether the staffing needs have changed based on acuity of the residents and their plans of care. Additional staff and/or staff training will be provided if it determined that the needs of the residents cannot be met with the current level of staff or staff training.
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with respect and dignity, and care for...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with respect and dignity, and care for each resident in a manner, and in an environment which promoted maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, and recognizing each resident's individuality for 4 of 21 Residents (Residents #7, #8, #23, and #38,) on the North Hall and 2 of 17 Residents (Residents #30 and #35) on the South Hall of the facility reviewed for Dignity.
The facility failed to ensure Residents #7, #8, #9, #23, #30, #35 and #38 dignity was protect when a TA (Transition Aide) was verbally abusive and threatened the residents.
This failure could place residents at risk of feeling uncomfortable and disrespected and could decrease residents' self-esteem and/or quality of life.
Findings include:
Resident #38
Record review of Resident #38's undated face sheet revealed she was a [AGE] year-old-female admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of necrotizing fasciitis (flesh eating bacteria), cellulitis of the lower limb, hypokalemia, abscess of the mouth, nausea vomiting, chronic diarrhea and pain in right toe.
Record review of Resident #38's MDS re-admission dated 05/26/2022 revealed she had a BIMS (brief interview for memory status) of 15 indicating she was cognitively intact and able to make her needs known. Section G (functional status) revealed she required supervision for personal hygiene.
Record review of Resident #38's Care Plan dated 05/22/2022 revealed she was at risk for falls, weight loss due to chronic diarrhea, and use of anti-depressant medication.
Record review of Resident #38's physician orders dated 05/28/2022 initial orders revealed the following medications: Cymbalta 60 milligram (anti-depressant) 1 tablet a daily for depression.
During initial tour of the facility on 09/20/22 at 9:35 AM, interview with Resident #38 asked the surveyor what she should do if a staff member threatened her for being a tattle tale. She said she would explain in further detail, but she was on her way to an outing with the activity director and fellow residents and would explain later.
During an interview on 09/21/2022 at 8:00 AM, Resident #38 said TA K worked last night and told her that the state was in the building and that if she told on him (regarding the verbal abuse) it was going to be bad for her (threaten retribution) . She said it was an ongoing issue because of the problems he initially had with the smokers and the complaints against him regarding not giving showers and the allegation of being sexually inappropriate with Resident #35. She said she was afraid of him because of his behaviors, he yells at residents and slams doors and enter rooms without knocking. She said he worked last night (09/20/2022 6:00 PM to 09/21/2022 to 6:00 AM) and told her these things. She said she was told to sign the questionnaire when the thing with Resident #35 came up (sexual abuse allegation) did not feel comfortable with it.
During an interview 09/21/2022 at 8:10 AM with Resident #38's roommate ( Resident #9) who participates in the smoking area was alert and oriented times three (aware of person place and time). said she witnessed TA K making threatening remarks when he came into their room during his shift ( 09/20/2022 6:00 PM to 09/21/2022 to 6:00 AM)(but in the morning-unsure of the exact time) and accused Resident #9 of telling on him (regarding to the showers, and verbal abuse) and when Resident #9 said she did not tell on him, he then accused Resident #38 and said he would get her (implying potential injury or abuse).
During an interview on 09/22/2022 at 2:00 PM with Resident #38, while she was on the telephone with her mother, her mother told the surveyor she was aware of the threats Resident #38 was receiving from TA K and hoped the surveyor will help resolve the threats she was receiving from him (from TA K).
Record review of Resident #35's undated face sheet revealed she was a [AGE] year-old-female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of: hypertension, heart failure, thrombosis of other thoracic veins (blood clot in thoracic vein), Weakness, Other muscle spasm, and need for assistance with personal care.
Review of Resident #35's annual MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #35 had a BIMS of 15 indicating she was cognitively intact and able to make her needs known. Section G (Functional Status) revealed she required extensive assistance with dressing, bathing, toilet use and hygiene with one person assistance.
Review of Resident #35's Care Plan dated 08/21/2022 revealed resident had communication difficulty, at risk for pressure ulcers, utilize wheelchair for mobility, risk for falls and morbidly obese.
Review of the facility's Incident Report dated 08/31/2022 revealed the following: Sexual assault allegation reported by resident (Resident #35) Resident stated male CNA (TA K) hugged her and made a humping movement rubbed his penis against her arms. Resident said she told male CNA (TA K) to stop. Male CNA (TA K) suspended until further notice pending investigation of allegation of sexual assault allegations . Authorities notified .
Review of Police Report (undated report case #22-02928) revealed Assault checked of the form. Further investigation by the police unsubstantiated the allegation as well as DHS investigator.
During Resident Council meeting on 09/21/2022 at 10:15 AM, 14 residents attended, Resident #35 was the president of the council (preceding over the meeting). Residents 6 of (14) expressed grievances regarding TA K because he said he would only give out two cigarettes due to the residents complaining about him about showers. They said he told the residents on the smoke break he can do whatever he wanted to and when he gives out the cigarettes for the breaks even though three cigarettes were giving on other breaks. Several (4 on the north hall) residents said TA K would go up and down the hall and slam doors, yell at residents and just walk into rooms without knocking and especially when the ladies were dressing. Surveyor asked residents attending the Resident Council Meeting how many people were afraid of TA K, 9 residents held up their hands including Resident #7, #,8, #23, #35 and #38 (4 others did not wish to be identified).
Review of Resident #8's undated face sheet revealed she was a [AGE] year-old-female re-admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of: bipolar disorder, gout (excessive uric acid collected in joints), pain in ankle and foot, insomnia (difficulty sleeping).
Review of Resident #8's last assessed MDS dated [DATE] revealed she had a BIMS score of 12 indicating she was moderately cognitively impaired but able to make her needs known. Section G (Function Status) revealed she needed set up and supervision with personal hygiene.
Review of Resident #8's Care Plan dated 10/11/2018 revealed to participate in activities, risk for falls due to safety awareness, and chronic illness due to lupus (autoimmune syndrome).
During interview on 09/22/2022 at 10:50 AM Resident #8 said, TA K would yell at the residents and would bump into them inappropriately hugging them. She said she was afraid of TA K; he had a habit of coming into women's room not knocking when he knew they were dressing. She said she was afraid of him because he was always threatening the residents in one way or another (unspecific regarding threats). She said she was told to sign the questionnaire (about Resident #35's sexual assault allegation and if they felt safe) and was uncomfortable about being identified.
During an interview on 09/22/2022 at 2:20 PM with Resident #8's family member, (son) said she mentioned the inappropriate behavior TA K displayed (inappropriate hugging, yelling at residents, slamming doors making threatening comments) and he was in the process of getting her moved out.
Review of Resident #23's undated face sheet revealed she was a [AGE] year-old-female re-admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of: Displaced fracture of base of neck of left femur, Overactive bladder, Pneumonia, abnormalities of gait and mobility.
Review of Resident #23's Initial MDS dated [DATE] revealed she had a BIMS score of 14 indicating she was cognitively intact and able to make her needs known. Section G (Function Status) revealed she required extensive assistance with personal hygiene.
Review of Resident #23's Care Plan dated 08/10/2022 revealed she was at risk for pressure ulcers and at risk for anemia.
During an interview with Resident #23 on 09/22/2022 at 11:05 AM, she said TA K came one night to change her and told her we need to make love. She said she told him that was a very inappropriate statement. She said, he said she misunderstood him and changed her brief. She said he made her very uncomfortable, and she was lucky she only needed to be changed one time. She said her family member, Resident #32 (lives in same room) said he did not hear the conversation, but TA K goes down the hall and yells and was very loud.
Resident #30
Review of Resident #30's undated face sheet revealed he was a [AGE] year-old-male admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of: Malignant neoplasm of bronchus or lung (Admission), anxiety disorder, Pain, and displaced fracture of surgical neck of left humerus.
Review of Resident #30's MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS of 3 indicating he was severely cognitively impaired. Section G (Function Status) revealed he required extensive assistance for personal hygiene.
During one-on-one interview with Resident #30 on 09/23/2022 3:00 PM, he stated he was familiar with TA K, and he worked the night shift. He stated he was uncomfortable around him and felt intimidated. He stated he would rather stay wet than ask him for help because you could tell it made TA K mad. He stated no one else made him feel that way. He stated TA K acted mad and smarted off to them when he took the smokers out to smoke. He stated he could not remember what he said but he knew TA K made him feel bad He could not remember a specific date or time.
Review of Resident #7's undated face sheet revealed he was a [AGE] year-old-male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of: Chronic pain due to trauma, Anorexia nervosa, binge eating/purging type, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, Tachycardia, Gastro-esophageal reflux disease with esophagitis, Heart failure, disorder of thyroid, Vascular dementia with behavior disturbances.
Review of Resident #7's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed he had a BIMS score of 15 indicating he was cognitively intact and able to make his needs known. Section G (Functional Section) revealed he required extensive assistance for personal hygiene.
During an interview with Resident #7 on 09/22/2022 at 2:45 PM, he said he was always arguing with TA K because he always made a fuss about changing him. He said TA K called him a bitch and not being a man because Resident #7 needed someone to change him. (Resident #7 said no use to complaining because no one does anything about it. He said they (residents) complain about TA K, but nothing is done (Resident Council grievances)
During an interview with the Administrator and DON on 09/22/2022 at 11:40 AM, they said they must find out what was going on. The Administrator said she found out TA K left one night and went home around 11:00 PM (disciplinary documentation stated date of incident 08/31/2022) and was missing for 5 hours. The Administrator said human resources (corporate) told Administrator and DON they had the options of terminating him or counsel him and allow him to return to work. She said we were given that options. The DON said the Aide who worked with him said he left for 5 hours and fell asleep at home. The Administrator said HR (human resources) told them it was clear cut reason to terminate him, but we were given the option of counseling him. The Administrator and DON stated they chose to allow him to return to work.
Interview with the Activity Director on 09/22/2022 at 12:15 PM, said she was aware of the problems the residents who participates in the smoke breaks during the smoke breaks (#7, #8, #9 #35, and #38 and four more not willing to be identified) was having with TA (transition assistant) and has given the Resident Council minutes to the ADON (resident council minutes and grievances were reviewed by surveyor prior to the Resident Council meeting on 09/21/2022 at 10:15 AM) and they discuss the problem in the stand-up meetings. She said they counseled him and let him come back. She said she has no influence on who to hire or fire. She said, all I can do is make the Administrator know.
During an interview with Resident #38 on 09/22/2022 at 12:35 PM, said the call lights will turn on and a light will come on outside the room, but the alarm will not come on. Resident #38 resides on the hall where TA K works. Resident #38 said because of the sexual abuse allegation TA K had to work on the North Hall. Resident #38 said because the call lights would not sound, he TA K could be threatening, yell at the resident slam doors and be abusive. Only 1 aide on South Hall and 1 nurse on the night shift were unaware of what was happening.
Observation of Resident #38's Call light being turned on 09/22/2022 at 12:35 PM revealed the light outside of her room coming on but not audible sound coming on.
Observation on 09/23/2022 at 9:30 AM alarm system was checked on the North Hall, in the center of the hall a switch could be turn off and on. Off the sound of the call light alarms was off and on the call light alarms could be heard.
Resident #38 said because the call lights would not sound, he TA K could be threatening, yell at the resident slam doors and be abusive.
During an interview with ADON on 09/22/2022 at 4:35 PM, she said she has never been given any of the grievances or Resident Council minutes by the Activities Director and has not been aware of residents being threatened.
During an interview with the Administrator on 09/23/2022 at 10:40 AM, surveyor asked if she was aware of the complaints from the residents, that they were being threatened by TA K. She said this was the first time she heard about the complaints and never received any of the Resident Council Minutes or grievances. Administrator was told by the survey team.
During interview with CNA I on 09/23/2022 at 3:00 PM, she said she was working the South Hall and noticed the call light panel going off for residents on the North Hall. She said TA K was only allowed to work the North Hall because of the allegations of sexual abuse alleged by Resident #35. She said she went to the North Hall and noticed several call lights on and took care of the residents. She said she then texted TA K and asked where he was, she said he wrote back and said he went home and fell asleep. She said he said he will be back. She said he did not come back till 5 in the morning. She said he threatened her if she told anyone. CNA I was unspecific about the threat but noticed someone was trying to vandalize her car the next night She called the Administrator who said not to take any more calls from him.
Record review revealed inappropriate behavior dated 09/21/2022 at 6:00 AM ADON confronted TA K regarding his charting .he did not give a fuck about charting the point of care in the computer, and they would not be done. She said she asked him to discuss the matter with her and he said, he did not have to talk to her . The Administrator told ADON to write down this encounter for disciplinary action.
Attempts to interview TA K was made on 09/23/2022 at 2:00 PM, Regional Operations Manager also attempted to call TA K at an undisclosed time on 09/23/2022 for an interview he said TA K hung up the telephone and would not speak to the Regional Operations Manager as told to surveyors.
Attempts to interview Charge nurse on 09/23/2022 regarding TA K leaving the facility for 5 hours was made without success in returning telephone calls.
During an interview with the Administrator 09/25/2022 at 2:30 PM, she said Resident #35 came to her and said TA K was telling us on smoke break we were all a bunch of liars, and he would preach about he was tight with God, and we were going to hell and Resident #35 was making up the sexual assault allegation. She said regarding the interview of CNA L, Administrator said because of the sexual abuse allegation there were not to be any discussions about what happened that was why she told her not to take any more calls from TA K. When asked by the surveyors what the Administrator thought about TA K calling the residents liars and preaching, she said she told TA K not to preach to the residents anymore. Administrator added TA K has been terminated , but not referred to the misconduct registry.
Review of Email provided by Administrator to Human Resources dated 09/23/2022 at 8:10 AM confirmed termination of TA K.
Review of the Grievances dated 08/28/2022 On 6:30 PM recorded by the Resident Council secretary revealed: during smoke break TA K informed everyone that we were only getting two cigarettes instead of three that we usually get for the last smoke break of the day. When asked why he said we complained about the showers not being given then we were to have our break cut short. Then asked if it was the nurses or the management, he said it was his decision and if we did not like it that we could go in and not go bother to come out for the next smoke break that he would be taking us out on. He told a group since he got in trouble that we were only getting two cigarettes instead of the three. He continues to push the issue about showers so that Resident #7 was the blame for only getting two cigarettes since he complained about the showers . TA K said he was taking us out of the kindness of his heart. TA K continued to argue with Resident #35 and said he was in charge and that what he says is final and if we don't like it, there is the door. It was brought to my attention as Resident Council Secretary by Resident Council President that Resident #35 said when TA K was giving her hugs, he was making a motion as if humping her.
Review of the Grievances dated 09/06/2022 revealed the following:
(Activities Director and Social Worker in attendance and emergency Resident Council meeting was called)
Social Worker -
1.
Recognizing and reviewing malicious grievances. Just because you don't like someone is not a reason for a grievance. But if they are threatening you or bullying you or touching you in appropriately or when told not to. This is malicious grievance and should be told to an employee and written up. Harassing is not tolerated in this facility.
2.
Only the employees are to call and talk to resident family. No one is to have the phone number It has been brought to the attention that a resident has been calling other resident family unless it's the resident themselves or have the business to call other than the facility or the resident in question. It has been brought to the attention that a resident has been calling other resident family or guardian .
Review of the Grievances dated 09/15/2022 recorded by the Resident Council secretary revealed the following: During the 6:30 PM smoke break. One of the aides said something about the one in purple (Resident #35) thinking it was her (related to sexual assault allegation) Things got heated Then TA K said that at this facility the residents have many real Big Liars Then he started in on a soap box sermon about him and God are like that! And that those liars were going to Hell. The residents here will be struck down. I (resident #38 Resident Council Secretary)
Told the charge nurse and she said that the incident was reported to her. I did not know that all the situation was not reported.
Review of the Grievances dated 09/21/2022 recorded by the Resident Council Secretary revealed the following: TA K split up the smokers into 2 groups sending out one group. TA K kept stating that the Administrator told him he had to take us out into groups instead of all at once. No one was told of this until we were on our way to the patio. TA K told Resident #8 he could not come outside because he did not have cigarettes. Resident #38 was awakened at 11:30 PM by a loud noise in her room TA K told me If you have any complaints about me (beating his chest) then keep your mouth shut. He then turned to my roommate and asked her if she called the Administrator and report me. She said No. Then he said your neighbor is doing that.
Resident #35 asked to keep her door open, and TA K yelled and slammed the door shut time was 10:15 PM.
During an interview with Administrator on 09/23/2022 at 4:40 PM she said TA K's only had abuse and neglect training completed with no other modules completed at the time of hire.
Review of TA K's hire date provided by the facility was 08/16/2022.
Record review of TA K's disciplinary action dated 08/31/2022 revealed the following: Final Warning- Time clock abuse - Not clocking out (5 hours left the building) contacting employees while investigation is ongoing - contacting and engaging with residents during investigation. Immediate termination if this problem occurs
(Need) to follow command when leaving the building - clocking out when leaving the building - not reaching out to employees or residents when investigation is ongoing.
Review of facility policy and procedure dated June 2021 titled, Abuse Prevention Program revealed the following:
.2 Our residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation. This includes but is not limited to freedom from corporate punishment involuntary seclusion verbal mental sexual or physical abuses .
5. Our Center will not condone any form of resident abuse or neglect. To aid in abuse prevention, all personnel are to report any signs and symptoms of abuse/neglect to their supervisor and to the Abuse Prevention Coordinator immediately.
6. Our Center will protect residents from harm, reprisal, discriminating or coercion during investigations of abuse allegations.
7. All reports of resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property mistreatment and/or injuries of unknown source shall be promptly reported to local, state, and federal agencies and thoroughly investigated by the Center management. Findings of abuse investigation will also be reported.
8. Our Center will provide protection for the health, welfare and the rights of each resident residing in the Center to ensure the reporting of crimes.
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0558
(Tag F0558)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to accommodate the needs and preferences of 5 of 26 sampl...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to accommodate the needs and preferences of 5 of 26 sampled residents (Residents #5, #30, #34, #8, and #4) reviewed for accommodation of needs.
The facility failed to place call lights within reach for Residents #5, #30, and #34.
The facility failed to place soap dispensers within reach in the communal bathrooms for Residents #8 and #4.
The facility failed to provide space in the communal bathrooms to accommodate wheelchairs for Resident #8 and #4.
These deficient practices could place residents at risk of their needs and preferences not being met and a decreased quality of life.
Findings include:
Resident #5
Review of Resident #5's Face Sheet, dated 09/23/22, revealed a [AGE] year-old male, admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included: Hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting unspecified side (admission Diagnosis), Parkinson's Disease, epileptic seizures related to external causes, aphasia, and need for assistance with personal care.
Review of the Quarterly MDS for Resident #5 dated 06/28/22 reflected a BIMS score of 99 which indicated the resident was not able to complete the assessment. Resident #5 was assessed to require extensive assistance to complete ADLs.
In an observation and interview during initial rounds, on 09/20/22 at 9:20 AM, Resident #5 was lying in bed. His call light was out of reach and lying on the floor. When asked if he could reach his call light, he said no.
In an interview on 09/20/22 at 9:30 AM, CNA M said she was the only CNA on the hallway and had not got to him yet.
In an interview on 09/20/22 at 9:35 AM, LVN C said CNA K was the only CNA on the hallway and she had not got to him yet.
In an observation on 09/20/22 at 11:59 AM, Resident #5 call light was out of reach and was lying on the floor.
In an observation on 09/20/22 at 4:04 PM, Resident #5's call light was out of reach and lying on the floor.
Resident #30
Review of Resident #30's Face Sheet, dated 09/28/22, revealed a [AGE] year-old male, admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnosis was need for assistance with personal care.
Review of the Quarterly MDS for Resident #30 dated 08/17/22, reflected a BIMS score of 03 (severe impairment). Resident #30 was assessed to require extensive assistance to complete ADLs.
During an observation during initial rounds on 09/20/22 at 9:40 AM, Resident #30's call light out of reach and lying on the floor. Resident was not interviewable.
Resident #34
Review of Resident #34's Face Sheet, dated 09/28/22, revealed a [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included: cerebral infarction due to thrombosis of left middle cerebral artery, hemiplegia unspecified affecting right dominant side, aphasia, dysphagia, and need for assistance with personal care.
Review of the MDS for Resident #34 dated 08/27/22 reflected a BIMS was not able to be completed. Resident #34 was assessed to require extensive assistance and total dependence to complete ADLs.
During an observation during initial rounds on 09/20/22 at 9:40 AM, Resident #34's call light out of reach and lying on the floor. Resident was not interviewable.
During an observation on 09/20/22 at 4:06 PM, Resident #34's call light was not within reach and was lying on the floor. Resident was not interviewable.
Resident #8
Review of Resident #8's Face Sheet, dated 09/24/22, revealed a [AGE] year-old female, admitted the facility on 09/28/18. Diagnoses include: systemic lupus erythematosus unspecified, unilateral primary osteoarthritis left knee, pain in left knee, pain in left ankle and joints of left foot, muscle weakness (generalized), and need for assistance with personal care.
Review of the Annual MDS for Resident #8 dated 06/15/22 reflected a BIMS score of 12 (moderately impaired). Resident #8 was assessed to require supervision to complete ADLs. Resident #8 mobility was by wheelchair.
In an observation and interview on 09/20/22 at 10:04 PM, Resident #8 said she had difficulty getting her wheelchair in the bathroom, in the north hallway, due to furniture (shower chair, shower bench, and table) being in the way. She said staff does not move the furniture out of way when they are done giving a resident a shower. Resident #8 said she cannot reach the soap dispenser due to it being too high as she cannot stand up. Resident #8 said she has complained about the furniture being in the way, but nothing is done about it.
In an interview on 09/20/22 at 9:35 AM, LVN C she was not aware of the resident's having difficulty getting into the bathroom due to shower furniture being in the way or the soap dispensers being too high.
Resident #4
Review of Resident #4's Face Sheet, dated 09/24/22, revealed a [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses include: Cerebral infarction unspecified (Admission), hemiplegia and hemiparesis following nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage affecting left non-dominant side, Parkinson's disease, and difficulty in walking.
Review of the Quarterly MDS for Resident #4 dated 06/20/22 reflected a BIMS score of 15 (cognitively intact). Resident #4 was assessed to require supervision and limited assistance to complete ADLs. Resident #4 mobility is by wheelchair.
In an observation and interview on 09/25/22 at 10:00 AM, Resident #4 was ambulating in a wheelchair. She was having difficulty getting her wheelchair in the communal bathroom in the North Hallway due to a shower chair, shower bench and table in the way as the shower area is connected to the toilet. Resident #4 said the bathroom is often like this and she has to try to move the furniture out of the way. She said there is usually no staff to help and does the best she can. Resident said she is not able to use soap to wash her hands due to the soap dispenser being too high as she is not able to stand up out of her wheelchair to reach it.
In an interview on 09/25/22 at 1:50 pm, the DON said he was not aware of the soap dispensers being too high for residents in wheelchairs to reach them, but he would have them moved. He said the shower furniture is supposed to be moved out of the way when they are done giving a resident a bath.
In an interview on 09/21/22 at 5:02 PM, the DON said it was his expectation for resident's call lights to be within reach and that lights not in reach could result in unmet needs for the resident.
Record review of facility's policy Accommodation of Needs, (revised March 2021) revealed [in part] .
Policy Statement
Our facility's environment and staff behaviors are directed toward assisting the resident in maintaining and/or achieving safe independent functioning, dignity and well-being.
Policy Interpretation and Implementation
1. The resident's individual needs and preferences are accommodated to the extent possible, except when the health and safety of the individual or other residents would be endangered.
2. The resident's individual needs and preferences, including the need for adaptive devices and modifications to the physical environment, are evaluated upon admission and reviewed on an ongoing basis.
3. In order to accommodate individual needs and preferences, adaptations may be made to the physical environment, including the resident's bedroom and bathroom, as well as the common areas in the facility.
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0565
(Tag F0565)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to consider the views of a resident or family group and act promptly u...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to consider the views of a resident or family group and act promptly upon the grievances and recommendations of such groups for 6 of (14) who attended the Resident Council Meetings reviewed for grievance response said their grievances were not addressed.
The facility failed to address grievances voiced in the resident council meeting held in 08/28/2022, 09/07/2022, 09/15/2022 and 09/21/2022, when the residents consistently voiced fear of retaliation, verbal abuse, and threats from staff member TA K.
This failure could place residents at risk unresolved grievances, a decreased sense of self-worth, and a decline in quality of life due to potential physical harm and mental anguish.
Findings Included:
Resident #38
Record review of Resident #38's undated face sheet revealed she was a [AGE] year-old-female admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of necrotizing fasciitis (flesh eating bacteria), cellulitis of the lower limb, hypokalemia, abscess of the mouth, nausea vomiting, chronic diarrhea and pain in right toe.
Record review of Resident #38's MDS re-admission dated 05/26/2022 revealed she had a BIMS (brief interview for memory status) of 15 indicating she was cognitively intact and able to make her needs known. Section G (functional status) revealed she required supervision for personal hygiene.
Record review of Resident #38's Care Plan dated 05/22/2022 revealed she was at risk for falls, weight loss due to chronic diarrhea, and use of anti-depressant medication.
Record review of Resident #38's physician orders dated 05/28/2022 initial orders revealed the following medications: Cymbalta 60 milligram (anti-depressant) 1 tablet a daily for depression.
During initial tour of the facility on 09/20/22 at 9:35 AM, interview with Resident #38 asked the surveyor what she should do if a staff member threatened her for being a tattle tale. She said she would explain in further detail, but she was on her way to an outing with the activity director and fellow residents and would explain later.
During an interview on 09/21/2022 at 8:00 AM, Resident #38 said TA K worked last night and told her that the state was in the building and that if she told on him (regarding the verbal abuse) it was going to be bad for her (threaten retribution) . She said it was an ongoing issue because of the problems he initially had with the smokers and the complaints against him regarding not giving showers and the allegation of being sexually inappropriate with Resident #35. She said she was afraid of him because of his behaviors, he yells at residents and slams doors and enter rooms without knocking. She said he worked last night (09/20/2022 6:00 PM to 09/21/2022 to 6:00 AM) and told her these things. She said she was told to sign the questionnaire when the thing with Resident #35 came up (sexual abuse allegation) did not feel comfortable with it.
During an interview 09/21/2022 at 8:10 AM with Resident #38's roommate ( Resident #9) who participates in the smoking area was alert and oriented times three (aware of person place and time). said she witnessed TA K making threatening remarks when he came into their room during his shift ( 09/20/2022 6:00 PM to 09/21/2022 to 6:00 AM)(but in the morning-unsure of the exact time) and accused Resident #9 of telling on him (regarding to the showers, and verbal abuse) and when Resident #9 said she did not tell on him, he then accused Resident #38 and said he would get her (implying potential injury).
During an interview on 09/22/2022 at 2:00 PM with Resident #38, while she was on the telephone with her mother, her mother told the surveyor she was aware of the threats Resident #38 was receiving from TA K and hoped the surveyor will help resolve the threats she was receiving him (from TA K).
Resident #35
Record review of Resident #35's undated face sheet revealed she was a [AGE] year-old-female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of: hypertension, heart failure, thrombosis of other thoracic veins (blood clot in thoracic vein), Weakness, Other muscle spasm, and need for assistance with personal care.
Review of Resident #35's annual MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #35 had a BIMS of 15 indicating she was cognitively intact and able to make her needs known. Section G (Functional Status) revealed she required extensive assistance with dressing, bathing, toilet use and hygiene with one person assistance.
Review of Resident #35's Care Plan dated 08/21/2022 revealed resident had communication difficulty, at risk for pressure ulcers, utilize wheelchair for mobility, risk for falls and morbidly obese.
Review of the facility's Incident Report dated 08/31/2022 revealed the following: Sexual assault allegation reported by resident (Resident #35) Resident stated male CNA (TA K) hugged her and made a humping movement rubbed his penis against her arms. Resident said she told male CNA (TA K) to stop. Male CNA (TA K) suspended until further notice pending investigation of allegation of sexual assault allegations . Authorities notified .
Review of Police Report (undated report case #22-02928) revealed Assault checked of the form. Further investigation by the police unsubstantiated the allegation as well as HHSC investigator.
During Resident Council meeting on 09/21/2022 at 10:15 AM, 14 residents attended, Resident #35 was the president of the council (preceding over the meeting). Residents 6 of (14) expressed grievances regarding TA K because he said he would only give out two cigarettes due to the residents complaining about him about showers. The said he told the residents on the smoke break he can do whatever he wanted to and when he gives out the cigarettes for the breaks even though three cigarettes were giving on other breaks. Several (4 on the north hall) residents said TA K would go up and down the hall and slam doors, yell at residents and just walk into rooms without knocking and especially when the ladies were dressing. Surveyor asked residents attending the Resident Council Meeting how many people were afraid of TA, 9 residents held up their hands including Resident #7, #,8, #23, #35 and #38 (4 others did not wish to be identified).
Resident #8
Review of Resident #8's undated face sheet revealed she was a [AGE] year-old-female re-admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of: bipolar disorder, gout (excessive uric acid collected in joints), pain in ankle and foot, insomnia (difficulty sleeping).
Review of Resident #8's last assessed MDS dated [DATE] revealed she had a BIMS score of 12 indicating she was moderately cognitively impaired but able to make her needs known. Section G (Function Status) revealed she needed set up and supervision with personal hygiene.
Review of Resident #8's Care Plan dated 10/11/2018 revealed to participate in activities, risk for falls due to safety awareness, and chronic illness due to lupus (autoimmune syndrome).
During interview on 09/22/2022 at 10:50 AM Resident #8 said, TA K would yell at the residents and would bump into them inappropriately hugging them. She said she was afraid of TA K; he had a habit of coming into women's room not knocking when he knew they were dressing. She said she was afraid of him because he was always threatening the residents in one way or another (unspecific regarding threats). She said she was told to sign the questionnaire (about Resident #35's sexual assault allegation and if they felt safe) and was uncomfortable about being identified.
During an interview on 09/22/2022 at 2:20 PM with Resident #8's family member, (son) said she mentioned the inappropriate behavior TA K displayed (inappropriate hugging, yelling at residents, slamming doors making threatening comments) and he was in the process of getting her moved out.
Resident #23
Review of Resident #23's undated face sheet revealed she was a [AGE] year-old-female re-admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of: Displaced fracture of base of neck of left femur, Overactive bladder, Pneumonia, abnormalities of gait and mobility.
Review of Resident #23's Initial MDS dated [DATE] revealed she had a BIMS score of 14 indicating she was cognitively intact and able to make her needs known. Section G (Function Status) revealed she required extensive assistance with personal hygiene.
Review of Resident #23's Care Plan dated 08/10/2022 revealed she was at risk for pressure ulcers and at risk for anemia.
During an interview with Resident #23 on 09/22/2022 at 11:05 AM, she said TA K came one night to change her and told her we need to make love. She said she told him that was a very inappropriate question. She said, he said she misunderstood him and changed her brief. She said he made her very uncomfortable, and she was lucky she only needed to be changed one time. She said her family member, Resident #32 (lives in same room) said he did not hear the conversation, but TA K goes down the hall and yells and was very loud.
Resident #30
Review of Resident #30's undated face sheet revealed he was a [AGE] year-old-male admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of: Malignant neoplasm of bronchus or lung (Admission), anxiety disorder, Pain, and displaced fracture of surgical neck of left humerus.
Review of Resident #30's MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS of 3 indicating he was severely cognitively impaired. Section G (Function Status) revealed he required extensive assistance for personal hygiene.
During one-on-one interview with Resident #30 on 09/23/2022 3:00 PM, he stated he was familiar with TA K, and he worked the night shift. He stated he was uncomfortable around him and felt intimidated. He stated he would rather stay wet than ask him for help because you could tell it made TA K mad. He stated no one else made him feel that way. He stated TA K acted mad and smarted off to them when he took the smokers out to smoke. He stated he could not remember what he said but he knew TA K made him feel bad He could not remember a specific date or time.
Resident #7
Review of Resident #7's undated face sheet revealed he was a [AGE] year-old-male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of: Chronic pain due to trauma, Anorexia nervosa, binge eating/purging type, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, Tachycardia, Gastro-esophageal reflux disease with esophagitis, Heart failure, disorder of thyroid, Vascular dementia with behavior disturbances.
Review of Resident #7's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed he had a BIMS score of 15 indicating he was cognitively intact and able to make his needs known. Section G (Functional Section) revealed he required extensive assistance for personal hygiene.
During an interview with Resident #7 on 09/22/2022 at 2:45 PM, he said he was always arguing with TA K because he always made a fuss about changing him. He said he called him a bitch and not being a man because Resident #7 needed someone to change him. (Resident #7 said no use to complaining because no one does anything about it. He said they (residents) complain about TA K, but nothing is done (Resident Council grievances)
During an interview with the Administrator and DON on 09/22/2022 at 11:40 AM, they said they must find out what was going on. The Administrator said she found out TA K left one night and went home around 11:00 PM (disciplinary documentation stated date of incident 08/31/2022) and was missing for 5 hours. The Administrator said human resources (corporate) told Administrator and DON they had the options of terminating him or counsel him and allow him to return to work. She said we were given that options. The DON said the Aide who worked with him said he left for 5 hours and fell asleep at home. The Administrator said HR (human resources) told them it was clear cut reason to terminate him, but we were given the option of counseling him. The Administrator and DON stated they chose to allow him to return to work.
Interview with the Activity Director on 09/22/2022 at 12:15 PM, said she was aware of the problems the residents who participates in the smoke breaks during the smoke breaks (#7, #8, #9 #35, and #38 and four more not willing to be identified) was having with TA (transition assistant) and has given the Resident Council minutes to the ADON (resident council minutes and grievances were reviewed by surveyor prior to the Resident Council meeting on 09/21/2022 at 10:15 AM) and they discuss the problem in the stand-up meetings. She said they counseled him and let him come back. She said she has no influence on who to hire or fire. She said, all I can do is make the Administrator know.
During an interview with Resident #38 on 09/22/2022 at 12:35 PM, said the call lights will turn on and a light will come on outside the room, but the alarm will not come on. Resident #38 resides on the hall where TA K works.
Resident #38 said because the call lights would not sound, he TA K could be threatening, yell at the resident slam doors and be abusive. Only 1 aide on South Hall and 1 nurse on the night shift were unaware of what was happening.
During an interview with Resident #38 on 09/22/2022 at 12:35 PM, she said the call lights will turn on and a light will come on outside the room, but the alarm will not come on. Resident #38 resides on the hall where TA K works.
Resident #38 said because of the sexual abuse allegation TA K had to work on the North Hall the call lights would not sound he TA K could be threatening, yell at the resident slam doors and threaten them.
Observation of Resident #38's Call light being turned on 09/22/2022 at 12:35 PM revealed the light outside of her room coming on but not audible sound coming on.
Observation on 09/23/2022 at 9:30 AM alarm system was checked on the North Hall, in the center of the hall a switch could be turn off and on. Off the sound of the call light alarms was off and on the call light alarms could be heard.
Resident #38 said because the call lights would not sound, he TA K could be threatening, yell at the resident slam doors and be abusive.
During an interview with ADON on 09/22/2022 at 4:35 PM, she said she has never been given any of the grievances or Resident Council minutes by the Activities Director and has not been aware of residents being threatened.
During an interview with the Administrator on 09/23/2022 at 10:40 AM, surveyor asked if she was aware of the complaints from the residents, that they were being threatened by TA K. She said this was the first time she heard about the complaints and never received any of the Resident Council Minutes or grievances. Administrator was told by the survey team.
During interview with CNA I on 09/23/2022 at 3:00 PM, she said she was working the South Hall and noticed the call light panel going off for residents on the North Hall. She said TA K was only allowed to work the North Hall because of the allegations of sexual abuse alleged by Resident #35. She said she went to the North Hall and noticed several call lights on and took care of the residents. She said she then texted TA K and asked where he was, she said he wrote back and said he went home and fell asleep. She said he said he will be back. She said he did not come back till 5 in the morning. She said he threatened her if she told anyone. CNA I was unspecific about the threat but noticed someone was trying to vandalize her car the next night She called the Administrator who said not to take any more calls from him.
Record review revealed inappropriate behavior dated 09/21/2022 at 6:00 AM ADON confronted TA K regarding his charting .he did not give a fuck about charting the point of care in the computer, and they would not be done. She said she asked him to discuss the matter with her and he said, he did not have to talk to her . The Administrator told ADON to write down this encounter for disciplinary action.
Attempts to interview TA K was made on 09/23/2022 at 2:00 PM, Regional Operations Manager also attempted to call TA K at an undisclosed time on 09/23/2022 for an interview he said TA K hung up the telephone and would not speak to the Regional Operations Manager as told to surveyors.
Attempts to interview Charge nurse on 09/23/2022 regarding TA K leaving the facility for 5 hours was made without success in returning telephone calls.
During an interview with the Administrator 09/25/2022 at 2:30 PM, she said Resident #35 came to her and said TA K was telling us on smoke break we were all a bunch of liars, and he would preach about he was tight with God, and we were going to hell and Resident #35 was making up the sexual assault allegation. She said regarding the interview of CNA L, Administrator said because of the sexual abuse allegation there were not to be any discussions about what happened that was why she told her not to take any more calls from TA K. When asked by the surveyors what the Administrator thought about TA K calling the residents liars and preaching, she said she told TA K not to preach to the residents anymore. Administrator added TA K has been terminated.
Review of Email provided by Administrator to Human Resources dated 09/23/2022 at 8:10 AM confirmed termination of TA K.
Review of the Grievances dated 08/28/2022 On 6:30 PM recorded by the Resident Council secretary revealed: during smoke break TA K informed everyone that we were only getting two cigarettes instead of three that we usually get for the last smoke break of the day. When asked why he said we complained about the showers not being given then we were to have our break cut short. Then asked if it was the nurses or the management, he said it was his decision and if we did not like it that we could go in and not go bother to come out for the next smoke break that he would be taking us out on. He told a group since he got in trouble that we were only getting two cigarettes instead of the three. He continues to push the issue about showers so that Resident #7 was the blame for only getting two cigarettes since he complained about the showers . TA K said he was taking us out of the kindness of his heart. TA K continued to argue with Resident #35 and said he was in charge and that what he says is final and if we don't like it, there is the door. It was brought to my attention as Resident Council Secretary by Resident Council President that Resident #35 said when TA K was giving her hugs, he was making a motion as if humping her.
Review of the Grievances dated 09/06/2022 revealed the following:
(Activities Director and Social Worker in attendance and emergency Resident Council meeting was called)
Social Worker -
5.
Recognizing and reviewing malicious grievances. Just because you don't like someone is not a reason for a grievance. But if they are threatening you or bullying you or touching you in appropriately or when told not to. This is malicious grievance and should be told to an employee and written up. Harassing is not tolerated in this facility.
6.
Only the employees are to call and talk to resident family. No one is to have the phone number It has been brought to the attention that a resident has been calling other resident family unless it's the resident themselves or have the business to call other than the facility or the resident in question. It has been brought to the attention that a resident has been calling other resident family or guardian .
Review of the Grievances dated 09/15/2022 recorded by the Resident Council secretary revealed the following: During the 6:30 PM smoke break. One of the aides said something about the one in purple (Resident #35) thinking it was her (related to sexual assault allegation) Things got heated Then TA K said that at this facility the residents have many real Big Liars Then he started in on a soap box sermon about him and God are like that! And that those liars were going to Hell. The residents here will be struck down. I (resident #38 Resident Council Secretary)
Told the charge nurse and she said that the incident was reported to her. I did not know that all the situation was not reported.
Review of the Grievances dated 09/21/2022 recorded by the R revealed the following: TA K split up the smokers into 2 groups sending out one group. TA K kept stating that the Administrator told him he had to take us out into groups instead of all at once. No one was told of this until we were on our way to the patio. TA K told Resident #8 he could not come outside because he did not have cigarettes. Resident #38 was awakened at 11:30 PM by a loud noise in her room TA K told me If you have any complaints about me (beating his chest) then keep your mouth shut. He then turned to my roommate and asked her if she called the Administrator and report me. She said No. Then he said your neighbor is doing that.
Resident #35 asked to keep her door open, and TA K yelled and slammed the door shut time was 10:15 PM
During an interview with Administrator on 09/23/2022 at 4:40 PM she said TA K's only had abuse and neglect training completed with no other modules completed at the time of hire.
Review of TA K's hire date provided by the facility was 08/16/2022.
Record review of TA K's disciplinary action dated 08/31/2022 revealed the following: Final Warning- Time clock abuse - Not clocking out (5 hours left the building) contacting employees while investigation is ongoing - contacting and engaging with residents during investigation. Immediate termination if this problem occurs. (Need) to follow command when leaving the building - clocking out when leaving the building - not reaching out to employees or residents when investigation is ongoing.
Review of facility policy and procedure dated June 2021 titled, Abuse Prevention Program revealed the following [in part]:
.2 Our residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation. The includes but is not limited to freedom from corporate punishment involuntary seclusion verbal mental sexual or physical abuses .
5. Our Center will not condone any form of resident abuse or neglect. To aid in abuse prevention, all personnel are to report any signs and symptoms of abuse/neglect to their supervisor and to the Abuse Prevention Coordinator immediately.
6. Our Center will protect residents from harm, reprisal, discriminating or coercion during investigations of abuse allegations.
7. All reports of resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property mistreatment and/or injuries of unknown source shall be promptly reported to local, state, and federal agencies and thoroughly investigated by the Center management. Findings of abuse investigation will also be reported.
8. Our Center will provide protection for the health, welfare and the rights of each resident residing in the Center to ensure the reporting of crimes.
Review of facility policy and procedure, revised April 2107, titled Grievances/Complaints, Filing revelaed the following [in part] .
Policy Statement: Residents and their representatives have the right to file grievances, either orally or in writing, to the facility staff or to the agency designated to hear grievances (e.g., the State Ombudsman).
The Administrator and staff will make prompt efforts to resolve grievances to the satisfaction of the resident and/or representative.
Policy Interpretation and Implementation:
1. Any resident, family member, or appointed resident representative may file a grievance or complaint concerning care, treatment, behavior of other residents, staff members, theft of property, or any other concerns regarding his or her stay at the facility. Grievances also may be voiced or filed regarding care that has not been furnished.
2. Residents, family and resident representatives have the right to voice or file grievances without discrimi-nation or reprisal in any form, and without fear of discrimination or reprisal.
3. All grievances, complaints or recommendations stemming from resident or family groups concerning is-sues of resident care in the facility will be considered. Actions on such issues will be responded to in writing, including a rationale for the response.
5. Grievances and/or complaints may be submitted orally or in writing, and may be filed anonymously.
8. Upon receipt of a grievance and/or complaint, the Grievance Officer will review and investigate the [NAME]-gations and submit a written report of such findings to the Administrator within five (5) working days of receiving the grievance and/or complaint.
9. The Grievance Officer will coordinate actions with the appropriate state and federal agencies, depending on the nature of the allegations. All alleged violations of neglect, abuse and/or misappropriation of property will be reported and investigated under guidelines for reporting abuse, neglect and misappropriation of property, as per state law.
10. The Grievance Officer, Administrator and Staff will take immediate action to prevent further potential vi-olations of resident rights while the alleged violation is being investigated.
11. The Administrator will review the findings with Grievance Officer to determine what corrective actions, if any, need to be taken.
12. The resident, or person filing the grievance and/or complaint on behalf of the resident, will be informed (verbally and in writing) of the findings of the investigation and the actions that will be taken to correct any identified problems. The Administrator, or his or her designee, will make such reports orally within _____ working days of the filing of the grievance or complaint with the facility. A written summary of the investigation will also be provided to the resident, and a copy will be filed in the business office.
13. If the grievance was filed anonymously, the Grievance Officer will inform the resident that a grievance has been anonymously filed on his or her behalf and the steps that will be taken to investigate the grievance(s) and report the findings. The Grievance Officer will reiterate to the resident that it is against facility policy and federal regulations to discriminate or sanction a resident who has filed or verbalized a complaint against the facility, and that his or her rights to be free of discrimination or reprisal will be protected.
Review of facility policy and procedure, revised February 2021, titled, Resident Council revealed the following [in part]:
Policy Statement: The facility supports residents ' rights to organize and participate in the resident council.
Policy Interpretation and Implementation:
1. The purpose of the resident council is to provide a forum for: residents, families and resident representatives to have input in the operation of the facility; discussion of concerns and suggestions for improvement; consensus building and communication between residents and facility staff; and disseminating information and gathering feedback from interested residents.
2. All residents are eligible to participate in the resident council. The facility staff encourages residents who are willing to participate. Staff, visitors, or other guests may attend resident council meetings if invited by the respective resident group.
3. The resident council group is provided with space, privacy and support to conduct meetings.
4. The council is encouraged to elect a president or chair to act as a liaison and facilitate communication between the council and a designated staff person who has been approved by the council.
5. Council meetings are scheduled monthly or more frequently if requested by residents. The date, time and location of the meetings are noted in the activities calendar.
6. A Resident Council Response Form will be utilized to track issues and their resolution. The facility department related to any issues will be responsible for addressing the item(s) of concern.
7. The quality assurance and performance improvement (QAPI) committee will review information and feedback from the resident council as part of their quality review. Issues documented on council response forms may be referred to the QAPI committee, if applicable (i.e., the issue is of serious nature or if there is a pattern, etc.).
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0574
(Tag F0574)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to post Resident Council Meeting minutes and Grievances or...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to post Resident Council Meeting minutes and Grievances or provide to Abuse Coordinator allegations of abuse and neglect for 1of 1 staff (the AD) reviewed for GRIEVANCES.*.
The facility did not provide the Abuse Coordinator with allegations of Abuse and Neglect during the Resident Council Minutes or Grievances.
These failures placed the residents at an unsafe environment exposing them to the risk of abuse, neglect, mental anguish along with the potential of physical abuse and death.
The findings include:
Record review of Resident #38's undated face sheet revealed she was a [AGE] year-old-female admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of necrotizing fasciitis (flesh eating bacteria), cellulitis of the lower limb, hypokalemia, abscess of the mouth, nausea vomiting, chronic diarrhea and pain in right toe.
Record review of Resident #38's MDS re-admission dated 05/26/2022 revealed she had a BIMS (brief interview for memory status) of 15 indicating she was cognitively intact and able to make her needs known. Section G (functional status) revealed she required supervision for personal hygiene.
Record review of Resident #38's Care Plan dated 05/22/2022 revealed she was at risk for falls, weight loss due to chronic diarrhea, and use of anti-depressant medication.
Record review of Resident #38's physician orders dated 05/28/2022 initial orders revealed the following medications: Cymbalta 60 milligram (anti-depressant) 1 tablet a daily for depression.
During initial tour of the facility on 09/20/22 at 9:35 AM, interview with Resident #38 asked the surveyor what she should do if a staff member threatened her for being a tattle tale. She said she would explain in further detail, but she was on her way to an outing with the activity director and fellow residents and would explain later.
During an interview on 09/21/2022 at 8:00 AM, Resident #38 said TA K worked last night and told her that the state was in the building and that if she told on him (regarding the verbal abuse) it was going to be bad for her (threaten retribution) . She said it was an ongoing issue because of the problems he initially had with the smokers and the complaints against him regarding not giving showers and the allegation of being sexually inappropriate with Resident #35. She said she was afraid of him because of his behaviors, he yells at residents and slams doors and enter rooms without knocking. She said he worked last night (09/20/2022 6:00 PM to 09/21/2022 to 6:00 AM) and told her these things. She said she was told to sign the questionnaire when the thing with Resident #35 came up (sexual abuse allegation) did not feel comfortable with it.
During an interview 09/21/2022 at 8:10 AM with Resident #38's roommate ( Resident #9) who participates in the smoking area was alert and oriented times three (aware of person place and time). said she witnessed TA K making threatening remarks when he came into their room during his shift ( 09/20/2022 6:00 PM to 09/21/2022 to 6:00 AM)(but in the morning-unsure of the exact time) and accused Resident #9 of telling on him (regarding to the showers, and verbal abuse) and when Resident #9 said she did not tell on him, he then accused Resident #38 and said he would get her (implying potential injury).
During an interview on 09/22/2022 at 2:00 PM with Resident #38, while she was on the telephone with her mother, her mother told the surveyor she was aware of the threats Resident #38 was receiving from TA K and hoped the surveyor will help resolve the threats she was receiving him (from TA K).
Record review of Resident #35's undated face sheet revealed she was a [AGE] year-old-female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of: hypertension, heart failure, thrombosis of other thoracic veins (blood clot in thoracic vein), Weakness, Other muscle spasm, and need for assistance with personal care.
Review of Resident #35's annual MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #35 had a BIMS of 15 indicating she was cognitively intact and able to make her needs known. Section G (Functional Status) revealed she required extensive assistance with dressing, bathing, toilet use and hygiene with one person assistance.
Review of Resident #35's Care Plan dated 08/21/2022 revealed resident had communication difficulty, at risk for pressure ulcers, utilize wheelchair for mobility, risk for falls and morbidly obese.
Review of the facility's Incident Report dated 08/31/2022 revealed the following: Sexual assault allegation reported by resident (Resident #35) Resident stated male CNA (TA K) hugged her and made a humping movement rubbed his penis against her arms. Resident said she told male CNA (TA K) to stop. Male CNA (TA K) suspended until further notice pending investigation of allegation of sexual assault allegations . Authorities notified .
Review of Police Report (undated report case #22-02928) revealed Assault checked of the form. Further investigation by the police unsubstantiated the allegation as well as DHS investigator.
During Resident Council meeting on 09/21/2022 at 10:15 AM, 14 residents attended, Resident #35 was the president of the council (preceding over the meeting). Residents 6 of (14) expressed grievances regarding TA K because he said he would only give out two cigarettes due to the residents complaining about him about showers. The said he told the residents on the smoke break he can do whatever he wanted to and when he gives out the cigarettes for the breaks even though three cigarettes were giving on other breaks. Several (4 on the north hall) residents said TA K would go up and down the hall and slam doors, yell at residents and just walk into rooms without knocking and especially when the ladies were dressing. Surveyor asked residents attending the Resident Council Meeting how many people were afraid of TA, 9 residents held up their hands including Resident #7, #,8, #23, #35 and #38 (4 others did not wish to be identified).
Review of Resident #8's undated face sheet revealed she was a [AGE] year-old-female re-admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of: bipolar disorder, gout (excessive uric acid collected in joints), pain in ankle and foot, insomnia (difficulty sleeping).
Review of Resident #8's last assessed MDS dated [DATE] revealed she had a BIMS score of 12 indicating she was moderately cognitively impaired but able to make her needs known. Section G (Function Status) revealed she needed set up and supervision with personal hygiene.
Review of Resident #8's Care Plan dated 10/11/2018 revealed to participate in activities, risk for falls due to safety awareness, and chronic illness due to lupus (autoimmune syndrome).
During interview on 09/22/2022 at 10:50 AM Resident #8 said, TA K would yell at the residents and would bump into them inappropriately hugging them. She said she was afraid of TA K, he had a habit of coming into women's room not knocking when he knew they were dressing. She said she was afraid of him because he was always threatening the residents in one way or another (unspecific regarding threats). She said she was told to sign the questionnaire (about Resident #35's sexual assault allegation and if they felt safe) and was uncomfortable about being identified.
During an interview on 09/22/2022 at 2:20 PM with Resident #8's family member, (son) said she mentioned the inappropriate behavior TA K displayed (inappropriate hugging, yelling at residents, slamming doors making threatening comments) and he was in the process of getting her moved out.
Review of Resident #23's undated face sheet revealed she was a [AGE] year-old-female re-admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of: Displaced fracture of base of neck of left femur, Overactive bladder, Pneumonia, abnormalities of gait and mobility.
Review of Resident #23's Initial MDS dated [DATE] revealed she had a BIMS score of 14 indicating she was cognitively intact and able to make her needs known. Section G (Function Status) revealed she required extensive assistance with personal hygiene.
Review of Resident #23's Care Plan dated 08/10/2022 revealed she was at risk for pressure ulcers and at risk for anemia.
During an interview with Resident #23 on 09/22/2022 at 11:05 AM, she said TA K came one night to change her and told her we need to make love. She said she told him that was a very inappropriate question. She said, he said she misunderstood him and changed her brief. She said he made her very uncomfortable, and she was lucky she only needed to be changed one time. She said her family member, Resident #32 (lives in same room) said he did not hear the conversation, but TA K goes down the hall and yells and was very loud.
Resident #30
Review of Resident #30's undated face sheet revealed he was a [AGE] year-old-male admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of: Malignant neoplasm of bronchus or lung (Admission), anxiety disorder, Pain, and displaced fracture of surgical neck of left humerus.
Review of Resident #30's MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS of 3 indicating he was severely cognitively impaired. Section G (Function Status) revealed he required extensive assistance for personal hygiene.
During one-on-one interview with Resident #30 on 09/23/2022 3:00 PM, he stated he was familiar with TA K, and he worked the night shift. He stated he was uncomfortable around him and felt intimidated. He stated he would rather stay wet than ask him for help because you could tell it made TA K mad. He stated no one else made him feel that way. He stated TA K acted mad and smarted off to them when he took the smokers out to smoke. He stated he could not remember what he said but he knew TA K made him feel bad He could not remember a specific date or time.
Review of Resident #7's undated face sheet revealed he was a [AGE] year-old-male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of: Chronic pain due to trauma, Anorexia nervosa, binge eating/purging type, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, Tachycardia, Gastro-esophageal reflux disease with esophagitis, Heart failure, disorder of thyroid, Vascular dementia with behavior disturbances.
Review of Resident #7's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed he had a BIMS score of 15 indicating he was cognitively intact and able to make his needs known. Section G (Functional Section) revealed he required extensive assistance for personal hygiene.
During an interview with Resident #7 on 09/22/2022 at 2:45 PM, he said he was always arguing with TA K because he always made a fuss about changing him. He said he called him a bitch and not being a man because Resident #7 needed someone to change him. (Resident #7 said no use to complaining because no one does anything about it. He said they (residents) complain about TA K, but nothing is done (Resident Council grievances)
During an interview with the Administrator and DON on 09/22/2022 at 11:40 AM, they said they must find out what was going on. The Administrator said she found out TA K left one night and went home around 11:00 PM (disciplinary documentation stated date of incident 08/31/2022) and was missing for 5 hours. The Administrator said human resources (corporate) told Administrator and DON they had the options of terminating him or counsel him and allow him to return to work. She said we were given that options. The DON said the Aide who worked with him said he left for 5 hours and fell asleep at home. The Administrator said HR (human resources) told them it was clear cut reason to terminate him, but we were given the option of counseling him. The Administrator and DON stated they chose to allow him to return to work.
Interview with the Activity Director on 09/22/2022 at 12:15 PM, said she was aware of the problems the residents who participates in the smoke breaks during the smoke breaks (#7, #8, #9 #35, and #38 and four more not willing to be identified) was having with TA (transition assistant) and has given the Resident Council minutes to the ADON (resident council minutes and grievances were reviewed by surveyor prior to the Resident Council meeting on 09/21/2022 at 10:15 AM) and they discuss the problem in the stand-up meetings. She said they counseled him and let him come back. She said she has no influence on who to hire or fire. She said, all I can do is make the Administrator know.
During an interview with Resident #38 on 09/22/2022 at 12:35 PM, said the call lights will turn on and a light will come on outside the room, but the alarm will not come on. Resident #38 resides on the hall where TA K works.
Resident #38 said because the call lights would not sound, he TA K could be threatening, yell at the resident slam doors and be abusive. Only 1 aide on South Hall and 1 nurse on the night shift were unaware of what was happening.
During an interview with Resident #38 on 09/22/2022 at 12:35 PM, she said the call lights will turn on and a light will come on outside the room, but the alarm will not come on. Resident #38 resides on the hall where TA K works.
Resident #38 said because of the sexual abuse allegation TA K had to work on the North Hall the call lights would not sound he TA K could be threatening, yell at the resident slam doors and threaten them.
Observation of Resident #38's Call light being turned on 09/22/2022 at 12:35 PM revealed the light outside of her room coming on but not audible sound coming on.
Observation on 09/23/2022 at 9:30 AM alarm system was checked on the North Hall, in the center of the hall a switch could be turn off and on. Off the sound of the call light alarms was off and on the call light alarms could be heard.
Resident #38 said because the call lights would not sound, he TA K could be threatening, yell at the resident slam doors and be abusive.
During an interview with ADON on 09/22/2022 at 4:35 PM, she said she has never been given any of the grievances or Resident Council minutes by the Activities Director and has not been aware of residents being threatened.
During an interview with the Administrator on 09/23/2022 at 10:40 AM, surveyor asked if she was aware of the complaints from the residents, that they were being threatened by TA K. She said this was the first time she heard about the complaints and never received any of the Resident Council Minutes or grievances. Administrator was told by the survey team.
During interview with CNA I on 09/23/2022 at 3:00 PM, she said she was working the South Hall and noticed the call light panel going off for residents on the North Hall. She said TA K was only allowed to work the North Hall because of the allegations of sexual abuse alleged by Resident #35. She said she went to the North Hall and noticed several call lights on and took care of the residents. She said she then texted TA K and asked where he was, she said he wrote back and said he went home and fell asleep. She said he said he will be back. She said he did not come back till 5 in the morning. She said he threatened her if she told anyone. CNA I was unspecific about the threat but noticed someone was trying to vandalize her car the next night She called the Administrator who said not to take any more calls from him.
Record review revealed inappropriate behavior dated 09/21/2022 at 6:00 AM ADON confronted TA K regarding his charting .he did not give a fuck about charting the point of care in the computer, and they would not be done. She said she asked him to discuss the matter with her and he said, he did not have to talk to her . The Administrator told ADON to write down this encounter for disciplinary action.
Attempts to interview TA K was made on 09/23/2022 at 2:00 PM, Regional Operations Manager also attempted to call TA K at an undisclosed time on 09/23/2022 for an interview he said TA K hung up the telephone and would not speak to the Regional Operations Manager as told to surveyors.
Attempts to interview Charge nurse on 09/23/2022 regarding TA K leaving the facility for 5 hours was made without success in returning telephone calls.
During an interview with the Administrator 09/25/2022 at 2:30 PM, she said Resident #35 came to her and said TA K was telling us on smoke break we were all a bunch of liars, and he would preach about he was tight with God, and we were going to hell and Resident #35 was making up the sexual assault allegation. She said regarding the interview of CNA L, Administrator said because of the sexual abuse allegation there were not to be any discussions about what happened that was why she told her not to take any more calls from TA K. When asked by the surveyors what the Administrator thought about TA K calling the residents liars and preaching, she said she told TA K not to preach to the residents anymore. Administrator added TA K has been terminated.
Review of Email provided by Administrator to Human Resources dated 09/23/2022 at 8:10 AM confirmed termination of TA K.
Review of the Grievances dated 08/28/2022 On 6:30 PM recorded by the Resident Council secretary revealed: during smoke break TA K informed everyone that we were only getting two cigarettes instead of three that we usually get for the last smoke break of the day. When asked why he said we complained about the showers not being given then we were to have our break cut short. Then asked if it was the nurses or the management, he said it was his decision and if we did not like it that we could go in and not go bother to come out for the next smoke break that he would be taking us out on. He told a group since he got in trouble that we were only getting two cigarettes instead of the three. He continues to push the issue about showers so that Resident #7 was the blame for only getting two cigarettes since he complained about the showers . TA K said he was taking us out of the kindness of his heart. TA K continued to argue with Resident #35 and said he was in charge and that what he says is final and if we don't like it, there is the door. It was brought to my attention as Resident Council Secretary by Resident Council President that Resident #35 said when TA K was giving her hugs, he was making a motion as if humping her.
Review of the Grievances dated 09/06/2022 revealed the following:
(Activities Director and Social Worker in attendance and emergency Resident Council meeting was called)
Social Worker -
7.
Recognizing and reviewing malicious grievances. Just because you don't like someone is not a reason for a grievance. But if they are threatening you or bullying you or touching you in appropriately or when told not to. This is malicious grievance and should be told to an employee and written up. Harassing is not tolerated in this facility.
8.
Only the employees are to call and talk to resident family. No one is to have the phone number It has been brought to the attention that a resident has been calling other resident family unless it's the resident themselves or have the business to call other than the facility or the resident in question. It has been brought to the attention that a resident has been calling other resident family or guardian .
Review of the Grievances dated 09/15/2022 recorded by the Resident Council secretary revealed the following: During the 6:30 PM smoke break. One of the aides said something about the one in purple (Resident #35) thinking it was her (related to sexual assault allegation) Things got heated Then TA K said that at this facility tthe residents have many real Big Liars Then he started in on a soap box sermon about him and God are like that! And that those liars were going to Hell. The residents here will be struck down. I (resident #38 Resident Council Secretary)
Told the charge nurse and she said that the incident was reported to her. I did not know that all the situation was not reported.
Review of the Grievances dated 09/21/2022 recorded by the R revealed the following: TA K split up the smokers into 2 groups sending out one group. TA K kept stating that the Administrator told him he had to take us out into groups instead of all at once. No one was told of this until we were on our way to the patio. TA K told Resident #8 he could not come outside because he did not have cigarettes. Resident #38 was awakened at 11:30 PM by a loud noise in her room TA K told me If you have any complaints about me (beating his chest) then keep your mouth shut. He then turned to my roommate and asked her if she called the Administrator and report me. She said No. Then he said your neighbor is doing that.
Resident #35 asked to keep her door open, and TA K yelled and slammed the door shut time was 10:15 PM
During an interview with Administrator on 09/23/2022 at 4:40 PM she said TA K's only had abuse and neglect training completed with no other modules completed at the time of hire.
Review of TA K's hire date provided by the facility was 08/16/2022.
Record review of TA K's disciplinary action dated 08/31/2022 revealed the following: Final Warning- Time clock abuse - Not clocking out (5 hours left the building) contacting employees while investigation is ongoing - contacting and engaging with residents during investigation. Immediate termination if this problem occurs
(Need) to follow command when leaving the building - clocking out when leaving the building - not reaching out to employees or residents when investigation is ongoing.
Review of facility policy and procedure dated June 2021 titled, Abuse Prevention Program revealed the following:
.2 Our residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation. The includes but is not limited to freedom from corporate punishment involuntary seclusion verbal mental sexual or physical abuses .
5. Our Center will not condone any form of resident abuse or neglect. To aid in abuse prevention, all personnel are to report any signs and symptoms of abuse/neglect to their supervisor and to the Abuse Prevention Coordinator immediately.
6. Our Center will protect residents from harm, reprisal, discriminating or coercion during investigations of abuse allegations.
7. All reports of resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property mistreatment and/or injuries of unknown source shall be promptly reported to local, state, and federal agencies and thoroughly investigated by the Center management. Findings of abuse investigation will also be reported.
8. Our Center will provide protection for the health, welfare and the rights of each resident residing in the Center to ensure the reporting of crimes.
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0584)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
F584 / N1337 / N1338 - Clean, Comfortable, Homelike Environment
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain a clean, sanitary, comfortable, and homelike environm...
Read full inspector narrative →
F584 / N1337 / N1338 - Clean, Comfortable, Homelike Environment
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain a clean, sanitary, comfortable, and homelike environment for 2 of 2 hallways (North and South ) and 2 of 4 bathrooms ( North And B and South A and B) observed for environment as evidence by:
A. The 2 hallways( North and South) in the facility had a strong odor of urine.
B. 2 of 4 communal bathrooms were dirty with feces.
This failure could place residents at risk for a diminished quality of life and a diminished clean, homelike environment.
Findings include:
In an observation on 09/20/22 at 9:00 AM, during entrance to the facility, 2 of 2 resident hallways had a strong smell of urine that permeated to all the resident rooms.
In an observation on 09/20/22 at 9:30 AM, during initial rounds, the communal bathroom on the north hallway had a dirty rag with feces on it lying in the shower area.
In an interview on 09/20/22 at 11:20 AM, the Housekeeping and Laundry Supervisor stated we clean the bathrooms when the CNAs come and ask us other than that the CNAs keep a spray bottle of disinfectant locked in the shower room.
Observation on 9/22/22 at 12:35 revealed there was no disinfectant in the bathroom.
In an interview on 09/20/22 at 3:25 PM, Resident #8 who was ambulating in the hallway in a wheelchair said the bathrooms are always dirty and sometimes she must wipe feces off the toilet before she can use it.
In an observation on 09/21/22 at 5:44 AM, the 2 resident's hallways had a strong smell of urine that permeated to all the resident rooms.
In an Interview on 09/22/22 at 12:30 PM, TA O said they were not allowed to have chemicals to clean the bathroom.
In an interview, on 09/22/22 at 12:35 PM, CNA N said we are not allowed to have chemicals to clean the bathroom.
In an observation and interview, on 09/24/22 at 10:30 AM, the Regional [NAME] President was shown a communal bathroom in the north hallway. The bathroom had a foul odor, the toilet seat was soiled with feces, and flies were flying around. He was asked to describe the smell, he said this was an old building and it has a musty smell. He did not acknowledge that he could smell urine. He said the building belongs to the Administrator. The Administrator was not available for interview.
In an interview on 09/25/22 at 1:50 PM, the DON said there was a battle between nursing and housekeeping. Housekeeping does not clean the toilets if soiled. If a CNA sees a dirty toilet or told there was a dirty toilet, they are supposed to clean it. The DON said he had made corporate aware of the situation.
Record Review of Resident Council minutes, dated 08/26/22, revealed under the heading of Old Business - Bathrooms are still uncleaned and unavailable. The response of the Administrator and Activity Director, who were in attendance, was if the problems continue find someone to clean them.
Record Review of the facility's policy, Homelike Environment, revised February 2021, revealed the following [in part] .
Policy Statement
Residents are provided with a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment and encouraged to use their personal belongings to the extent possible.
Policy Interpretation and Implementation
1. Staff provides person-centered care that emphasizes the residents' comfort, independence and personal needs and preferences.
2. The facility staff and management maximize, to the extent possible, the characteristics of the facility that reflect a personalized, homelike setting.
These characteristics include:
a. clean, sanitary and orderly environment.
f. pleasant, neutral scents.
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Grievances
(Tag F0585)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure prompt efforts to resolve grievances for 6 of 1...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure prompt efforts to resolve grievances for 6 of 14 (Resident #28, #35, #8, #30, #23, #7) residents reviewed for resident rights.
The facility did not promptly resolve multiple grievances for Resident #38, #35, #8, #30, #23, and #7 that included quality of care, resident rights and staff treatment towards residents.
This failure placed residents at risk of unresolved grievances, and at risk for a decreased quality of life.
Findings included:
Resident #38
Record review of Resident #38's undated face sheet revealed she was a [AGE] year-old-female admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of necrotizing fasciitis (flesh eating bacteria), cellulitis of the lower limb, hypokalemia, abscess of the mouth, nausea vomiting, chronic diarrhea and pain in right toe.
Record review of Resident #38's MDS (minimum data set) re-admission dated 05/26/2022 revealed she had a BIMS (brief interview for memory status) of 15 indicating she was cognitively intact and able to make her needs known. Section G (functional status) revealed she required supervision for personal hygiene.
Record review of Resident #38's Care Plan dated 05/22/2022 revealed she was at risk for falls, weight loss due to chronic diarrhea, and use of anti-depressant medication.
During an interview with Resident #38 on 09/22/2022 at 12:35 PM she said when she press her call light, a light will come one outside of the doorway of her room but there is no audible alarm.
Resident #35
Record review of Resident #35 undated face sheet revealed she was a [AGE] year-old-female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of: hypertension, heart failure, thrombosis of other thoracic veins (blood clot in thoracic vein), Weakness, Other muscle spasm, and need for assistance with personal care.
Review of Resident #35's annual MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #35 had a BIMS of 15 indicating she was cognitively intact and able to make her needs known. Section G (Functional Status) revealed she required extensive assistance with dressing, bathing, toilet use and hygiene with one person assistance
Review of Resident #35's Care Plan dated 08/21/2022 resident has communication difficulty, at risk for pressure ulcers, utilize wheelchair for mobility, risk for falls and morbidly obese.
Interview with Resident #35 on 09/20/2022 at 4:00 PM said she would discuss grievances at the Resident Council meeting since she was the present out going Resident Council President and aware the Resident Council meeting would be on 09/21/2022 at 10:15 AM.
Resident #8
Review of Resident #8 undated face sheet revealed she was a [AGE] year-old-female re-admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of: bipolar disorder, gout (excessive uric acid collected in joints), pain in ankle and foot, insomnia (difficulty sleeping).
Review of Resident #8's last assessed MDS dated [DATE] revealed she had a BIMS score of 12 indicating she is moderately cognitively impaired but able to make her needs known. Section G (Function Status) revealed she needs set up and supervision with personal hygiene.
Review of Resident #8's Care Plan 10/11/2018 reveal to participate in activities, risk for falls due to safety awareness, and chronic illness due to lupus (autoimmune syndrome).
During an interview on 09/22/2022 at 10:50 AM, Resident #8 said TA K would yell at the residents and would bump into them inappropriately hugging them. She said she was afraid of TA K as he had a habit of coming into the women's room not knocking when he knows they were dressing. She said she was afraid of him because he was always threatening the residents in one way or another (unspecific regarding threats). She said she did not complete the safe survey given by the facility because they were required to sign their name on the document and she didn't feel safe if she did that.
During an interview on 09/22/2022 at 2:20 PM with Resident #8's son said she has mentioned the inappropriate behavior TA K displayed and he is in the process of getting her move out of the facility.
Resident #23
Review of Resident #23's undated face sheet revealed she was a [AGE] year-old-female re-admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of: Displaced fracture of base of neck of left femur, Overactive bladder, Pneumonia, unspecified organism, Unspecified abnormalities of gait and mobility, and subsequent encounter for fracture with routine healing.
Review of Resident #23's Initial MDS dated [DATE] revealed she had a BIMS score of 14 indicating was cognitively intact and able to make her needs known. Section G (Function Status) revealed she required extensive assistance with personal hygiene.
Review of Care Plan dated 08/10/2022 revealed she was at risk for pressure ulcers and at risk for amenia.
During an interview with Resident #23 on 09/22/2022 at 11:05 AM she said TA K came one night to change me and asked me if I wanted to make love. She said she told him that was a very inappropriate question. She said he said she misunderstood her and changed her brief. She said he made her very uncomfortable and lucky she only needs to be changed one time, she said her husband Resident #32 (lives in same room) said he did not hear the conversation, but TA K goes down the hall and yells and is very loud. Residents #23 and #32 did not remember being asked to complete a safe survey given by the facility.
Resident #30
Review of Resident #30's undated face sheet revealed he was a [AGE] year-old-male admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of: Malignant neoplasm of unspecified part of unspecified bronchus or lung (Admission), anxiety disorder, unspecified, Pain, unspecified, and Unspecified displaced fracture of surgical neck of left humerus.
Review of Resident #30's MDS dated [DATE] with a BIMS of 3 indicating he was severely cognitively impaired. Section G (Function Status) revealed he required extensive assistance for personal hygiene.
During one-on-one interviews with Resident #30 on 09/23/2022 3:00 PM stated he was familiar with TA K, and he worked the night shift. He stated he was uncomfortable around him and felt intimidated. He stated he would rather stay wet than ask him for help because you could tell it made TA K mad. He stated no one else made him feel that way. He stated TA K acted mad and smarted off to them when he took the smokers out to smoke. He stated he could not remember what he said but he knew TA K made him feel bad He could not remember a specific date or time this instances occurred.
Resident #7
Review if Resident #7's undated face sheet revealed he was a [AGE] year-old-male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of: Chronic pain due to trauma, Anorexia nervosa, binge eating/purging type, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type, Tachycardia, unspecified, Gastro-esophageal reflux disease with esophagitis, without bleeding without bleeding, Heart failure, unspecified, Disorder of thyroid, unspecified, Vascular dementia with behavior disturbances.
Review of Resident #7's Quarterly MDS 09/24/2022 revealed he had a BIMS score of 15 indicating he was cognitively intact and able to make his needs known. Section G (Functional Section) revealed he required extensive assistance for personal hygiene.
During interview with Resident #7 on 09/22/2022 at 2:45 PM he said he always arguing with TA K because he always made a fuss about changing me. He called me a bitch and not being a man because Resident #7 needed someone to change him.
During an interview with the Administrator and DON on 09/22/2022 at 11:40 AM said she must find out what is going on by the DON. She said she found out TA K left one night and went home around 11:00 PM (disciplinary documentation stated date of incident 08/31/2022) and was missing for 5 hours. She said human resources said we had the options of terminating him or counsel him and allow him to return to work. She said we were given that options. Could said we had two options. He said the Aide who worked with him said he left for 5 hours and fell asleep at home. HR (human resources) said it was clear cut reason to terminate him, but we were given the option of counsel him. Regarding the call lights not working they are working, he said if you turn on the call light on the North Hall the panel on the South Hall lights up and nurses are aware of the call lights needed to be answered. He said they ordered a lock out panel, so nurses must put in a code to turn off the call light when it is answered to turn it off. He said he was not aware of any alarms being turned off on the North Hall.
Interview with Activity Director on 09/22/2022 at 12:15 PM said she was aware of the problems the resident was having with TA and has given the Resident Council minuets to the ADON and they discuss the problem in the stand-up meetings. She said they counseled him and let him come back. She said she has no influence on who to hire or fire. All I can do is make the Administrator know.
During an interview with Resident #38 on 09/22/2022 at 12:35 PM she said the call lights will turn on a light will come on outside the room, but the alarm will not come on.
Observation of Resident Call light being turned on 09/22/2022 at 12:35 PM revealed the light outside of her room coming on but not audible sound coming on.
Observation on 09/23/2022 at 9:30 AM, the call light alarm system was checked on the North Hall. In the center of the hallway there was a switch which could turn off and on the audible alarm. The alarm was currently in the off position. Upon testing of the alarm, when the alarm was in the off position, there was no audible alarm. When the alarm was in the on position, an audible alarm could be heard.
During an interview with ADON on 09/22/2022 at 4:35 PM said she had never been given any of the grievances or Resident Council minutes and had not been aware of residents being threatened. She said she was aware of the sexual allegations in the monning stand-up meeting with the department heads but that was pretty much it. She said on 09/21/2022 she confronted TA K regarding his charting for POC (point of care) because it was low, and he said .he did not give a fuck about the POCs, and they would not be done. She said she asked him to discuss the matter with her and he said, he did not have to talk to her, and he discussed with the Administrator what kind of person she was and did not have to talk to her.
During an interview with the Administrator on 09/23/2022 at 10:40 AM she said she separated the perpetrator from the sexual assault allegation, and he was suspended for 3 days, and it was cleared by HHSC. She said she conducted a safe survey questionnaire and sent the self-report to HHSC at the require time. Surveyor asked if she was aware of the threatening complaints the residents were receiving from TA K. She said this was the first time she heard about the complaints and never received any of the Resident Council Minutes or grievances. She was told by the survey team residents did not trust her to keep them safe when they had to sign the safe survey questionnaire and felt like they could not be truthful with the questions.
During interview with CNA L on 09/23/2022 at 3:00 PM said she was working the South Hall and noticed the call light panel going off for residents on the North Hall. She said TA K was only allowed to work the North Hall because of the allegations of sexual abuse by Resident #35. She said she went to the North Hall and noticed several call lights on and took care of the residents. She said she then texted TA K and asked where he was, she said he wrote back and said he went home and fell asleep. She said he said he will be back. He did not come back till 5 in the morning. She said he threatened her if she told anyone, and she called the Administrator and she said not to take any more calls from him.
During an interview with Administrator 09/25/2022 at 2:30 PM said Resident #35 came to her and said TA K was telling us on smoke break we are all a bunch of liars, and he would preach about he was tight with God, and we were going to hell. And Resident #35 was making up the sexual assault allegation. She said regarding the interview of CNA L Administrator said because of the sexual abuse allegation there were not to be any discussions about what happened that is why I told her not to take any more calls from TA K. When asked by the surveyors if Administrator thought calling the residents liars and preaching, she said she told TA K not to preach to the residents anymore. Administrator added TA K has been terminated.
Record review of the facility's Filing Grievance/Complaints Policy with a revision date of April 2017 indicated the following [In-part]:
Any resident, family member, or appointed resident representative may file a grievance or complaint concerning care, treatment, behavior of other residents, staff members, theft of property, or any other concerns regarding his or her stay at the facility. Grievances also may be voiced or filed regarding care that has not been furnished.
2. Residents, family and resident representatives have the right to voice or file grievances without discrimination or reprisal in any form, and without fear of discrimination or reprisal.
3. All grievances, complaints or recommendations stemming from resident or family groups concerning is-sues of resident care in the facility will be considered. Actions on such issues will be responded to in writing, including a rationale for the response.
4. Upon admission, residents are provided with written information on how to file a grievance or complaint. A copy of our grievance/complaint procedure is posted on the resident bulletin board.
5. Grievances and/or complaints may be submitted orally or in writing and may be filed anonymously.
6. The contact information for the individual(s) with whom a grievance may be filed is provided to the resident and/or representative upon admission.
7. The Administrator has delegated the responsibility of grievance and/or complaint investigation to the Grievance Officer who is __Dominique [NAME], Administrator ______ and can be contacted.
8. Upon receipt of a grievance and/or complaint, the Grievance Officer will review and investigate the allegations and submit a written report of such findings to the Administrator within five (5) working days of receiving the grievance and/or complaint.
9. The Grievance Officer will coordinate actions with the appropriate state and federal agencies, depending on the nature of the allegations. All alleged violations of neglect, abuse and/or misappropriation of property will be reported and investigated under guidelines for reporting abuse, neglect and misappropriation of property, as per state law.
10. The Grievance Officer, Administrator and Staff will take immediate action to prevent further potential vi-olations of resident rights while the alleged violation is being investigated.
11. The Administrator will review the findings with Grievance Officer to determine what corrective actions, if any, need to be taken.
12. The resident, or person filing the grievance and/or complaint on behalf of the resident, will be informed (verbally and in writing) of the findings of the investigation and the actions that will be taken to correct any identified problems.
The Administrator, or his or her designee, will make such reports orally within _____ working days of the filing of the grievance or complaint with the facility.
A written summary of the investigation will also be provided to the resident, and a copy will be filed in the business office.
13. If the grievance was filed anonymously, the Grievance Officer will inform the resident that a grievance has been anonymously filed on his or her behalf and the steps that will be taken to investigate the grievance(s) and report the findings. The Grievance Officer will reiterate to the resident that it is against facility policy and federal regulations to discriminate or sanction a resident who has filed or verbalized a complaint against the facility, and that his or her rights to be free of discrimination or reprisal will be protected.
14. The results of all grievances files, investigated and reported will be maintained on file for a minimum of three years from the issuance of the grievance decision.
15. This policy will be provided to the resident or the resident's representative upon request.
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan to meet the highest ...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan to meet the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial needs for 3 of 18 residents (Residents # 24, #30) reviewed for care plans as follows:
Resident #24 did not have a comprehensive care plan for his weight loss (peripherally inserted central catheter) or his diagnosis of Clostridioides Difficile.
Residents # 30 did not have a care plan for psychotropic drug use.
This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving the care required to meet their physical, mental, and psychosocial needs to attain or maintain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial outcome.
Findings include:
Resident # 24
Review of Resident #24's Electronic admission Record viewed on 09/20/2022 revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE].
Review of Resident #24's ICD-10 diagnoses listed in the electronic medical record reflected diagnoses of enterocolitis due to clostridioides difficile (a germ which causes diarrhea) Abnormal weight loss, diarrhea sepsis, and inflammation of the colon and hypoxic encephalopathy.
Observation of Resident #24 on 09/20/22 at 11:47 AM revealed that Resident #24 was not interviewable and had a peripherally inserted intravenous line ordered and present on r his left upper arm.
Record review of Resident #24's care plan dated 008/22/2022 revealed he was not care planned for his intravenous line in his left upper arm or his diagnoses of clostridioides
Difficile dated.
During an interview with the DON on 09/21/19/22 at 11:27 AM, he stated the MDS Nurse, and the nurses were responsible for forming care plans. They said the MDS Nurse did the quarterly and annual and assisted the nurses with the initial and acute care plans. They said the DON's role involved overseeing the care plan as and going over them with the MDS Nurse They said care plan updates were reviewed during clinical morning meetings which took place Monday through Friday. They were unable to provide a reason for the lack of care planning related to Resident #24's intravenous line or his diagnoses of clostridioides difficile (dated 9/15/22) He stated he had only been there since April 2022 and the ADON had been there for the last month and she was a mobile ADON and not permanent for this facility. He stated both areas should have been care planned. The DON, who was new to the position, will be getting additional training in his responsibilities from his corporation soon.
Resident # 30
Record Review of Resident #30's face sheet dated 09/24/22 revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: anxiety disorder (3/15/22), fracture of left humerus, malignant neoplasm of skin of right lower leg.
Record Review of Resident #30 significant change MDS dated [DATE] indicated the resident had a BIMS of 3 which indicated severe cognitive
Record Review of Resident #30's significant change MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident # 30 had not received an antianxiety agent.
Record review of controlled substance sheets revealed the #30 had lorazepam 2mg administer to him on 3/15/22, 3/18/22, 4/11/22, 7/31/22, 8/1/22 and 8/7/22.
Record review of Resident #30's physician orders dated 9/25/22 revealed orders for Lorazepam 1mg every 2 hours as needed for anxiety; for Lorazepam 1mg ½ tablet every 2 hours as needed for anxiety; for Lorazepam 2mg every 3 hours as needed for anxiety;
Record Review of Resident #30's Care Plan dated 05/15/22 revealed the care plan did not address prn use of an anti - anxiety agent.
Record Review of Resident #30's Care Plan dated 06/02/22 revealed care plan did not address smoking.
During an interview with the ADON on 09/24/22 at 2:00 PM she stated Resident # 30 should have a care plan for psychotropic drug use due to his prn use of Ativan. She stated a prn order for Ativan would only be good for 14 days.
During an interview with the Regional Nurse Consultant on 09/25/22 at 10:38 AM, the Regional Nurse Consultant stated each interdisciplinary team was responsible for developing and revising the care plan when a change occurs and the DON signs off on the care plan. The Regional Nurse stated the residents, care should be care planned. She stated that the MDS Nurse, Nurses, and DON were responsible for the care plan. She stated not completing or revising the care plan could result in the resident not receiving needed care.
Record review of the facility's policy, Care Plans- Comprehensive Person-Centered, Revised December 2020, revealed the following documentation:
Applicability: this policy sets forth the procedures relating to developing a comprehensive, person-centered care plan.
Policy Statement
A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the Resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident.
Policy Interpretation and Implementation:
#8. The comprehensive, person-centered care plan will:
Include measurable objectives and time frames.
1.
Describe the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable, physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being.
2.
Incorporate services that would be provided for the above, however, they are not provided due to the resident exercising his or her rights.
3.
Include the resident's goals upon admission and desired outcomes.
#10. Identifying problem areas and their causes and developing interventions that are targeted and meaningful to the Resident, are the endpoint of an interdisciplinary process.
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who were unable to carry out ac...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene for 3 of 26 residents (Resident's# 5, 17 and 34), reviewed for activities of daily living.
The facility failed to provide timely incontinence care for Resident #5.
The facility failed to provide nail care for Resident's #17 and #34.
The facility failed to provide oral care for Resident #34.
These failures could place residents who were dependent on staff for ADL care at risk for loss of dignity, risk for infections, skin breakdown, and a decreased quality of life.
Findings included:
Resident #5
Review of Resident #5's Face Sheet, dated 09/23/22, revealed a [AGE] year-old male, admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included: Hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting unspecified side (admission Diagnosis), Parkinson's Disease, epileptic seizures related to external causes, aphasia, and need for assistance with personal care.
Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #5 dated 06/28/22 reflected a BIMS score of 99 which indicated the resident was not able to complete the assessment. Resident #5 was assessed to require extensive assistance with toilet use and personal hygiene.
In an observation and interview during initial rounds on 09/20/22 at 9:20 AM, Resident #5 was lying in bed covered with a sheet, with numerous flies flying around him, pointing to his brief. He had difficulty speaking but would point. Observation of his brief revealed it was soaked and he was lying in wet bed linens. Resident said he had been wet for a long time.
In an interview during initial rounds on 09/20/22 at 9:30 AM, CNA K said she was the only CNA on the hallway and had not got to him yet. She said she would clean him. CNA K came back into the room and said she was going to give him a bath but would have to use the Hoyer lift and would have to wait for the other 2 CNAs in the facility to assist.
In an interview during initial rounds on 09/20/22 at 9:35 AM, LVN C said CNA K was the only CNA on the hallway and she had not got to him yet. She said Resident #5 required a Hoyer lift and they had to wait for the other 2 CNAs to come and assist. She said Resident #5 currently did not have any skin breakdown or any concerns with skin integrity.
In an interview on 09/21/22 at 5:02 PM, the DON said it was his expectation for resident's to be changed when needed. He said the holdup was due to the resident requiring a Hoyer lift. The DON said he would review the staffing.
Resident #17
Review of Resident #17's Face Sheet, not dated, revealed a [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included: Cerebral infarction, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following other cerebrovascular disease affecting left non-dominant side, personal history of pulmonary embolism, and need for assistance with personal care.
Observation on 09/20/22 during initial rounds revealed # 17's fingernails on both hands were long and needed cleaning and cutting.
Review of the Quarterly MDS for Resident #17 dated 08/10/22 reflected a BIMS score of 07 (severe impairment). Resident #17 was documented to require extensive assistance with personal hygiene.
Interview on 9/22/22 at 12:35 PM, CNA L said the CNAs cut nails when they had the time, and the nurse cuts the diabetics.
In an interview on 09/21/22 at 12:35 PM, LVN B said she didn't know exactly who was supposed to cut nails.
Resident #34
Review of Resident #34's Face Sheet, dated 09/25/22, revealed a [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included: vascular dementia, cerebral infarction due to thrombosis of left middle cerebral artery (stroke), hemiplegia unspecified affecting right dominate side (paralysis rt dominant side), aphasia, (unable to speak), dysphagia (unable to swallow), and need for assistance with personal care.
Review of the Quarterly MDS for Resident #34 dated 08/16/22 reflected a BIM) was not able to be completed. Resident #34 was assessed to require extensive assistance with personal hygiene.
Review of Resident #24's care plan revealed she had an approach with a start date of 4/8/22 to perform oral care every shift, assistance with bathing and hygiene every shift, and Resident #34 was NPO (nothing by mouth).
In an observation on 09/20/22 at 10:40 AM, Resident #34 was lying in bed in the Rt lateral position on a low bed. Her nails were long and unkempt, and her lips were dry and cracked with peeling skin.
In an observation on 09/20/22 at 4:06 PM, Resident #34's nails were dirty and needed trimming. Her lips were dry and cracked and skin peeling.
Unable to obtain an interview Resident #34 due to decreased cognitive status.
Interview with LVN E at 10:40 AM on 9/20/22 revealed it was the aide's duty to perform oral hygiene and nail care for Resident #34. She stated Nurses monitored the residents to ensure this was done.
Interview on 9/21/22 at 06:45 with CNA I, revealed CNAs were for responsible nail care and oral hygiene. She stated she would ask the nurse if she had questions about a resident's care.
Record Review of the facility policy Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), Supporting revised March 2018, revealed the following [in part] .
Policy Statement
Residents will provide with care, treatment, and services as appropriate to maintain or improve their ability to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs).
Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene.
Policy Interpretation and Implementation
2. Appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADLs independently, with the consent of the resident and in accordance with the plan of care, including appropriate support and assistance with:
a. Hygiene (bathing, dressing, grooming, and oral care);
b. Mobility (transfer and ambulation, including walking);
c. Elimination (toileting).
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0692
(Tag F0692)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status, s...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as usual body weight or desirable body weight range and electrolyte balance, unless the resident's clinical condition demonstrates that it is not possible or resident preferences indicated otherwise for 2 Residents 0f 4 (Resident #'s 10 and 24) reviewed for weight loss.
The facility failed to ensure Resident #10 did not have unplanned weight loss of 5% in 30 days.
The facility failed to ensure Resident # 24 did not have unplanned weight loss of 7.7 % in 30 days.
This failure could place residents at risk of not maintaining their nutritional needs.
The findings included:
Resident #10
Record review of Resident #10's electronic face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old male with an original admission date of 11/9/20. He had diagnoses which included: sepsis, need for assistance with personal care, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), muscle wasting and, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a chronic lung condition).
Record review of Resident # 10's Quarterly MDS, section C, dated 07/13/22, revealed a resident was unable to complete the BIMS Staff assessment for mental status. Review of section G revealed the resident required extensive assistance with dressing, and personal hygiene, and supervision, oversight or cueing with eating. Section K indicated the resident had a 5% wt. loss in one month. or 10% or more in 6 months and was not on a prescribed weight loss program. It documented he was on a mechanically altered diet and did not document that he was on Hospice.
Record review of Resident #10's orders, dated 09/23/2022, revealed the resident was on a mechanical soft diet with thin liquids. There was no order for Hospice.
Record review of the EMR for Resident # 10 revealed the following weights:
6/30/22 125
6/8/22 128
4/12/22 weight not taken
Record review of the dietary progress notes revealed the following:
No Dietary progress notes found for this resident since 2/24/21 it indicated:
Wt. Note:
Wt. reviewed, per Nursing, resident no longer being weighed at the request of Hospice. Most recent wt. obtained 11/9(113.63#). Intake avg 75-100% per ADL & CNA. Diet: Reg/Reg/Thin. No reported difficulty w/ chewing/swallowing. Skin intact per wound management. Meds reviewed: Folic acid. No recent labs. Intake > 75% w/ meals & fortified foods should aide in meeting kcal/pro needs. Will continue to monitor intake/wt. trend.
Recommendation: Continue current POC - Intake meets pattern meeting needs
Goal: Intake > 75%. Stable wt. +/- 5%. Skin intact
Record Review of Resident #10's care plan did not address his dietary or nutritional needs or refusal of wts. There was no hospice care plan .
In an interview and observation on 09/20/2022 at 12:45 PM, Resident #10 shook his head no that he was not hungry when asked by the surveyor. Resident had eaten less than 25 % of his diet at that time.
In an observation and interview with TA 0 at 12:45 PM, TA O stated she served Resident#10 lunch in his room. She stated he did not like to get up. She stated the aides stated the aides monitored the amount the residents ate, and the amount eaten and recorded it in the Kiosk.
During interview on 9/20/22 at 1:30 PM with LVN E, she stated residents who were served their meals in their rooms should be assisted if needed and offered a substitute if they did not eat. She stated the CNA's monitored the meal intake for the residents, offered substitutes, and recorded the amount eaten. in the electronic medical record. She stated she did not know who was responsible for obtaining weights or how often residents should be weighed.
Resident #24
Review of Resident #24's Electronic admission Record viewed on 09/20/2022 revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the resident's ICD-10 diagnoses listed in the electronic medical record reflected diagnoses of enterocolitis due to clostridioides difficile (a germ which causes diarrhea) Abnormal weight loss, diarrhea, sepsis, and inflammation of the colon and hypoxic encephalopathy.
Record Review of # 24's admission MDS dated [DATE] Section K revealed the resident weighed 129 lbs on admission and was 5 foot 5 inches tall. It documented the resident did not have a significant wt loss or gain . The MDS documented the resident received tube feedings and that he received 55 % or more of his nutrition from tube feedings.
Record review of Resident #24's care plan dated 08/22/2022 revealed he turned his feeding tube off at times and hat a nutritional care [NAME] with a goal of [NAME] wt. His intervention was listed as NPO. No other interventions were noted. There was no intervention to monitor #24's wt .
Record review of Resident # 24's wts in the EMR
09/21/22 09:45 AM
Weight: 119 lbs. / Routine BMI: 19.8
08/22/2022 10:00 AM
Weight: 129 lbs. / Routine BMI: 21.46
9/13/2022 02:26 PM
Weight: 119 lbs. / Routine BMI: 19.8
08/22/2022 10:00 AM
Weight: 129 lbs. / Routine BMI: 21.46
Record review of the RD Weight Loss Note revealed the following:
Weight: 119# (-7.7%x30d)
Height: 65in
BMI: 19.8 (normal)
Diet: Pureed diet, text, Nectar Thick liquids
Intake: varies, avg. 51-75%
TF: Water flush 200cc q6hr
Supplement/Snack orders: House Supplement 120ml TID, Ready Care RT Shake TID. Providing: 1320kcal/48gPro (720kcal/30gPro + 600kcal/18gPro)
Intake of supplement varies avg. 75%
Chewing or swallowing difficulty: none noted
Feeding ability: total dependence
Skin condition: no PIs noted
Adaptive devices: none noted
Pertinent labs: no updated labs available to review
Nutritionally relevant meds: aspirin,
Summary: Resident triggering for sig. weight loss x30d. BMI below favorable range. Resident on supplement for support. Noted per last RD note resident was previously receiving combo TF and PO intake however DC's d/t resident unable to tolerate TF. Visited resident at bedside non-verbal but shakes head yes/no. Resident said yes to noticing weight loss. Per nursing resident feeling nauseas r/t IV antibiotics. Resident likely not meeting needs with diet intake r/t varied PO intake of meals and nausea aeb sig. weight loss x30d.
Recommend:
1.Add Fortified Food Plan to all meals
2.Add Magic cup 30d QD
3.Continue weekly weights x4weeks
Goals: wt. maintenance +/-3%x30d or slow weight gain of 1-2#/week towards IBW, consistent PO intake >51%, maintain good skin integrity.
RD
Observation of Resident #24 on 09/20/22 at 11:47 AM revealed that Resident #24 was not interviewable and had a peripherally inserted intravenous line present on resident his left upper arm. He had eaten less than 25% of his diet.
An interview on 09/23/22 at 9:14 AM with the ADON revealed the aides had been getting the weights. She stated she thought that the policy stated weekly weights beginning on admission and for 3 weeks after admission to monitor the resident's weight. She stated she did not know why the weekly weights weren't done. She stated she had been there for a month, and she did not know why the weights had not been done.
In an interview on 09/23/22 at 10:00 AM the [NAME] stated that the ADON was responsible for weights. He was not sure what the policy was on weights and was not aware residents should be weighed on admission and weekly for the next 3 weeks. He was aware that Resident #24 was tube fed on admission but stated he was eating a pureed diet now due to the resident not tolerating his tube feedings. He stated he was aware of a discrepancy with some of the weights and stated the scales had recently been recalibrated. The DON presented documentation of a receipt for scale recalibration which was dated 9/20/22. He stated that the failure to monitor residents weights accurately could result in undetected wt loss and a decline in health.
Record review of the document provided by the facility titled Weight Management Workflow, with an effective date of dated 7/20/22 revealed in part:
admission:
Obtain admission weight and height within 24 hours of admission to the center and enter result into MatrixCare Vitals section of the resident's electronic health record.
Initiate a nutrition care plan within 48 hours of admission.
The resident is weighed once a week for 3 additional weeks post admission to establish baseline weight.
Monthly:
The resident will be weighed once a month
Initial monthly weight will be presented to the DON for review by the 5th of each month.
The DON identifies any resident with a 5 lbs. loss or gain and has the resident re-weighed by the 9th of the month under the supervision of a licensed nurse.
After the re-weights are completed, the DON will review the monthly weights for accuracy and the weight are entered into the EMR.
Update the care plan for each resident identified with a 5% loss or gain in 30 days, a 7.5 % loss or gain in 90 days, or a 10 % loss or gain in 180 days.
Residents with weight loss or gain are placed on weekly weights for 3 additional weeks or until the next monthly weights are obtained and evaluated.
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0868
(Tag F0868)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the quality assessment and assurance committee met at least quarterly.
The facility failed to hold QAPI meetings at least Quarterly...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the quality assessment and assurance committee met at least quarterly.
The facility failed to hold QAPI meetings at least Quarterly.
This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving quality medical care, decreased quality of life, and exposure to safety hazards.
The findings included:
In an interview on 09/25/22 at 2:03 PM, the Administrator said they started having QAPI meetings on the third Friday of each month. Their first meeting was on 09/16/22. The Administrator said she was hired on 08/08/22 and there were no prior QAPI meetings to knowledge before this date. The Administrator said she was responsible for ensuring QAPI meetings were held. The Administrator said failure to have QAPI meetings could prevent the facility problems from being corrected and monitored which could lead to decreased resident care and health.
Review of the facility's policy titled Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program - Governance and Leadership, dated as revised March 2020, revealed [in part]:
Policy Interpretation and Implementation
1. The Administrator, whether a member of the QAPI Committee or not, is ultimately responsible for the QAPI Program, and for interpreting its results and findings to the governing body.
7. The committee meets at least quarterly (or more often as necessary). Committee members are reminded of meeting day, time and location via e-mail at least two business days prior to the meeting.
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an Infection Prevention and Cont...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an Infection Prevention and Control Program designed to prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for infection prevention and control .
A. The facility failed to initiate transmission-based precautions to prevent the spread of infections for Resident # 24.
B. The facility failed to change gloves and perform hand hygiene when moving from a clean to a dirty area during incontinent care for Resident #22.
This failure could place residents at risk for infections.
The findings included:
Resident 24
Review of Resident #24's Face Sheet not dated revealed he was a 35- year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of: enterocolitis due to clostridium difficile, abnormal weight loss diarrhea, severe sepsis, and bacteriuria (bacteria in the urine).
Review of #24's admission MDS dated [DATE] revealed R #24:
- Required 1 - 2 person assist for bed mobility, transfer and personal hygiene. Staff assessment for mental status indicated the resident had a problem with long term memory, short term memory, decision making, had no signs of delirium and had disorganized thinking at times. The resident was documented as having no behaviors.
Review of the physician orders for #24 revealed the resident had a physician order for a stool specimen to be obtained to test for C. Diff on 9/1/22.
Review of Dr orders #24, dated 9/17/22 revealed the resident had orders for Vancomycin and metronidazole to be administer IV for a diagnosis of C. Diff. (Infection by bacteria of the colon).
Review of #24's care plan did not include a problem for the diagnosis of c. diff and transmission-based precautions.
Review of nurse notes for #24 dated 09/16/22/18 revealed Spoke with Nurse Practitioner and he stated the labs showed an elevated white count and possible c. diff and stated we can do IV access or PICC line access if unable to start an IV.
Review of nurse's notes for #24 dated 9/20/22 and 9/21/22 revealed the resident was on standard precautions, was being monitored for active infection, and was on antibiotic therapy.
Interview with LVN A (the nurse assigned to care for #24)on 09/20/22 at 7:19 AM revealed, she did not know what Resident #24 was receiving antibiotics for and she had not heard that he had a diagnosis for C. Diff.
Interview with CNA I at 7:29 AM on 9/20/22 revealed she had not been told by a nurse that #24 had C. Diff. She stated she had been a CNA for 14 years and she suspected it because the resident had diarrhea and his stools smelled like C. Diff. She stated resident #24 had diarrhea all night, and she did wear PPE because she knew he had C. diff from the smell. She stated she went to the supply room and just got what she thought she needed and went to his room to care for him. She also stated she took a garbage bag with her into the room to dispose of the soiled pep and then took it to the dumpster after she was done. She stated nobody told her, she just knew what to do.
Interview on 9/21/22 at 7:30 AM, TA O revealed no one had instructed her on the use of PPE and TBP precautions for #24. TA
Interview with Assistant Director of Nursing and DON on 9/21/18 at 7:57 AM revealed neither was aware of the C. Diff diagnose for #24. The DON stated he was the Infection Preventionist. He acknowledged the diagnosis for C. Diff was documented on 9/16/22 and the infection preventionist and the DON should have been notified by the nurse that took the order for the diagnosis. He stated the resident should have immediately been placed on isolation on TBP and staff be notified the resident was on transmission-based precautions. He stated the failure could result in the spread of infection to other resident's and staff. The ADON informed the surveyor that PPE was to be donned before entering a resident's rooms that was diagnosed with C. Diff with an isolation sign on the door of the room. She stated she was in the process of placing the resident on isolation.
Resident #22
Review of Resident #22's face sheet revealed she was a [AGE] year-old female with the following diagnoses: Need for assistance with personal care, candidiasis of vulva and vagina, hemiplegia and Muscle weakness
Review of #22's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed R #22:
- Required 1 - 2 person assist for bed mobility, personal hygiene, and bathing. Resident was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. Her BIMS was 15 which indicated she was cognitively intact.
Observation on 09/21/22 3:20 PM revealed peri care on #24 by CNA F and TA (transitional aide) O. Both CNAs washed their hands and donned gloves and provided privacy. CNA F and TA O removed #22's brief and wiped her abdomen and cleaned her vagina and spread her labia and wiped from front to back. They then turned #22 toward CNA, TA O and CNA F wiped her buttocks, which had feces. CNA F cleaned the area and did not remove her gloves and sanitize her hands before moving to a clean area and touching clean supplies. TA O Assisted in putting on #22's new brief without sanitizing her hands or changing gloves. Assisted turning resident to the supine position touching brief and areas considered clean without removing gloves or sanitizing hands throughout the process.
An interview with CNA F and TA O on 09/21/22 at 3:40 PM revealed that neither CNA could think of anything they would have done differently during the procedure.
Interview with the DON on 9/25/22 at 1:00 PM, revealed he would expect the staff to sanitize hands after completing a procedure. He stated it was important to perform hand hygiene after a procedure to prevent the spread of infection.
Record review of the facility policy Isolation - Initiating Transmission-Based Precautions, revised August 2019, revealed the following [in part] .
Policy Statement
Transmission-Based Precautions are initiated when a resident develops signs and symptoms of a transmissible infection; arrives for admission with symptoms of an infection; or has a laboratory confirmed infection; and is at risk of transmitting the infection to other residents.
Transmission-Based Precautions may include Contact Precautions, Droplet Precautions, or Airborne Precautions.
Policy Interpretation and Implementation
1. If a resident is suspected of, or identified as, having a communicable infectious disease, the Charge Nurse or Nursing Supervisor notifies the Infection Preventionist and the resident's Attending Physician for evaluation of appropriate Transmission-Based Precautions.
3. When Transmission-Based Precautions are implemented, the Infection Preventionist (or designee):
a. Clearly identifies the type of precautions, the anticipated duration, and the personal protective equip-mint (PPE) that must be used.
b. Explains to the resident (or representative) the reason(s) for the precautions.
c. Provides and/or oversees the education of the resident, representative and/or visitors regarding the precautions and use of PPE.
d. Determines the appropriate notification on the room entrance door and on the front of the resident's chart so that personnel and visitors are aware of the need for and type of precautions:
(1) The signage informs the staff of the type of CDC precaution(s), instructions for use of PPE, and/or instructions to see a nurse before entering the room.
(2) Signs and notifications comply with the resident's right to confidentiality or privacy.
e. Ensures that protective equipment (i.e., gloves, gowns, masks, etc.) is maintained outside the resident's room so that anyone entering the room can apply the appropriate equipment.
f. Ensures that protective equipment and supplies needed to maintain precautions during care are in the resident's room; and
g. Ensures that an appropriate linen barrel/hamper and waste container, with appropriate liner, are placed in or near the resident's room.
Record Review of the facility policy Isolation - Categories of Transmission-Based Precautions, (revised January 2012), revealed the following [in part] .
Policy Statement
1. Standard Precautions shall be used when caring for residents at all times regardless of their suspected or confirmed infection status. Transmission-Based Precautions shall be used when caring for residents who are documented or suspected to have communicable diseases or infections that can be transmitted to others.
2. Examples of infections requiring Contact Precautions include, but are not limited to:
b. Diarrhea associated with Clostridium difficile.
The facility will implement a system to alert staff to the type of precaution resident requires
Record Review of the facility policy Handwashing/Hand Hygiene, (revised August 2019), revealed the following [in part] .
Policy Statement
This facility considers hand hygiene the primary means to prevent the spread of infections.
Policy Interpretation and Implementation
1. All personnel shall be trained and regularly in-serviced on the importance of hand hygiene in preventing the transmission of healthcare-associated infections.
2. All personnel shall follow the handwashing/hand hygiene procedures to help prevent the spread of infections to other personnel, residents, and visitors.
6. Wash hands with soap (antimicrobial or non-antimicrobial) and water for the following situations: When hands are visibly soiled; and After contact with a resident with infectious diarrhea including, but not limited to infections caused by norovirus, salmonella, shigella and C. difficile.
7. Use an alcohol-based hand rub containing at least 62% alcohol; or, alternatively, soap (antimicrobial or non-antimicrobial) and water for the following situations:
b. Before and after direct contact with residents.
f. Before donning sterile gloves.
g. Before handling clean or soiled dressings, gauze pads, etc.
h. Before moving from a contaminated body site to a clean body site during resident care.
j. After contact with blood or bodily fluids.
m. After removing gloves.
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0919
(Tag F0919)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident rooms were adequately equipped to allow residents to call for staff assistance through a communication system...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident rooms were adequately equipped to allow residents to call for staff assistance through a communication system which relays the call directly to a staff member or to a centralized staff work area, for the entire facility reviewed for call system functioning.
The facility's call system was not fully functional. The system did not have a working audible signal that was consistently used.
This failure could place residents at risk of being unable to call for assistance from staff.
The findings included:
During Resident Council meeting om 09/21/2022 at 10:15 AM, 5 Residents #7, #8, #23, #35, #38 voiced concerns that the call light was not coming on when it was engaged, or the system possibly being turned off.
In an interview on 09/22/2022 at 12:35 PM, Resident #38 said the call lights will turn on a light above the door outside the room, but the alarm will not come on.
In an observation on 09/22/2022 at 12:35 PM, Resident #39's call light was turned on. The lights outside of the residents' doors were lighting up to indicate that the resident was calling for assistance. There was no audible sound.
In an interview on 09/22/22 at 1:00 PM, CAN N said the call lights audible signal can be turned down at the call light panel located behind the nurses station on the south hall.
In an interview on 09/22/2022 at 1:15 PM, Resident #17 said she doesn't know if the call lights work or not it takes them a while to get her most of the time and I don't hear anything.
In an observation on 09/23/2022 at 9:30 AM, the alarm system was checked on the North Hall. In the center of the hall a switch could be turn off and on. The sound to the call light alarms was off and the call light alarms could not be heard.
In an interview on 09/23/22 at 10:38 AM, the Administrator said she not aware there was a concern with the call light system and the audible signal until it was brought up this morning. The Administrator was unaware staff could turn down the volume of the alarm and are looking at what they can do to correct it. She acknowleged this could result in residents not having their care needs met .
During an interview with the Administrator and DON (DON was also the Maintenance Supervisor) on 09/22/2022 at 11:40 AM the Admisistrator stated she would find out what was going on from the DON. The DON stated the call lights were working, he said if you turn on the call light on the North Hall the panel on the South Hall lights up and nurses are aware the call lights need to be answered. The DON stated he ordered a lock out panel, so nurses must put in a code to turn off the call light when it is answered . He stated he was not aware of any alarms being turned off on the North Hall.
During an observation and interview with Resident #38 on 09/22/2022 at 12:35 PM she said the call lights will turn on a light will come on outside the room, but the alarm will not come on. The light outside of the room came on but there was no audible sound.
An observation on 09/23/2022 at 9:30 AM revealed a switch could be turned off on the North Hall. When the switch was off the sound of the call light was silenced. If the switch was on the call light alarms could be heard.
Record review of the facility's Answering the Call Light Policy with a revision date of March 2021 indicated the following [In-part]:
7. Report all defective call lights to the nurse supervisor promptly.
MINOR
(C)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Staffing Information
(Tag F0732)
Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to post the actual hours worked by the licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for direct resident care per s...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to post the actual hours worked by the licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for direct resident care per shift on a daily basis. For a minimum of 18 months.
The facility failed to update the daily staffing information posting on 09/20/22 to 09/26/22.
This failure could place the residents, families, and visitors at risk of not having access to information regarding the daily nurse staffing data and facility census.
Findings included:
Observation on 09/20/22 at 9:30 AM, revealed the daily staffing pattern was posted in a binder behind the one nurse's station which was located on the south hall. The staffing posting did not include the following required information: resident census, the total number of licensed nurses, unlicensed staff, CNAs, or RNAs scheduled, the actual hours scheduled, or the actual hours worked.
Observation on 09/21/22 at 8:30 AM, revealed the daily staffing pattern was posted in a binder behind the one nurse's station which was located on the south hall. The staffing posting did not include the following required information: resident census, the total number of licensed nurses, unlicensed staff, CNAs, or RNAs scheduled, the actual hours scheduled, or the actual hours worked.
Observation on 09/22/22 at 10:30 AM, revealed the daily staffing pattern was posted in a binder behind the one nurse's station which was located on the south hall. The staffing posting did not include the following required information: resident census, the total number of licensed nurses, unlicensed staff, CNAs, or RNAs scheduled, the actual hours scheduled, or the actual hours worked.
Observation on 09/23/22 at 9:30 AM, revealed the daily staffing pattern was posted in a binder behind the one nurse's station which was located on the south hall. The staffing posting did not include the following required information: resident census, the total number of licensed nurses, unlicensed staff, CNAs, or RNAs scheduled, the actual hours scheduled, or the actual hours worked.
Observation on 09/24/22 at 11:30 AM, revealed the daily staffing pattern was posted in a binder behind the one nurse's station which was located on the south hall. The staffing posting did not include the following required information: resident census, the total number of licensed nurses, unlicensed staff, CNAs, or RNAs scheduled, the actual hours scheduled, or the actual hours worked.
Observation on 09/25/22 at 9:30 AM, revealed the daily staffing pattern was posted in a binder behind the one nurse's station which was located on the south hall. The staffing posting did not include the following required information: resident census, the total number of licensed nurses, unlicensed staff, CNAs, or RNAs scheduled, the actual hours scheduled, or the actual hours worked.
During an interview on 09/21/22 at 8:49 am, the ADON stated the DON was responsible for the staffing posting and she was not aware of any regulation on staff postings.
During an interview on 09/25/22 at 9:00 am, the DON stated, he was responsible for the staffing posting, but was not aware of all the information the staffing posting should contain. He further revealed, he was unable to produce 18 months of prior staffing postings.
During interview on 09/25/22 at 10:40 am, the Administrator stated, the DON was responsible for nursing staffing and postings.