PLEASANTON SOUTH NURSING AND REHABILITATION

905 WEST OAKLAWN RD, PLEASANTON, TX 78064 (830) 569-3861
Government - Hospital district 88 Beds EDURO HEALTHCARE Data: November 2025 3 Immediate Jeopardy citations
Trust Grade
22/100
#544 of 1168 in TX
Last Inspection: September 2024

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Pleasanton South Nursing and Rehabilitation has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating poor performance with significant concerns. It ranks #544 out of 1,168 nursing homes in Texas, placing it in the top half, but this still reflects underlying issues. The facility is improving, having reduced its number of issues from five in 2024 to one in 2025, which is a positive trend. However, staffing is a notable weakness, with a rating of 2 out of 5 stars and a turnover rate of 52%, which is average for Texas but suggests instability. Recent inspections revealed critical incidents, including a resident leaving the facility unnoticed and a failure to provide CPR and use an AED during an emergency, both of which could jeopardize resident safety. While the facility has good RN coverage, more than 89% of Texas facilities, the serious nature of these findings raises concerns for families considering this home.

Trust Score
F
22/100
In Texas
#544/1168
Top 46%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Getting Better
5 → 1 violations
Staff Stability
⚠ Watch
52% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
Penalties
✓ Good
$24,653 in fines. Lower than most Texas facilities. Relatively clean record.
Skilled Nurses
○ Average
Each resident gets 32 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for Texas. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
Violations
⚠ Watch
35 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★★★☆☆
3.0
Overall Rating
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Staff Levels
★★★☆☆
3.0
Care Quality
★★★☆☆
3.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2024: 5 issues
2025: 1 issues

The Good

  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in fire safety.

The Bad

3-Star Overall Rating

Near Texas average (2.8)

Meets federal standards, typical of most facilities

Staff Turnover: 52%

Near Texas avg (46%)

Higher turnover may affect care consistency

Federal Fines: $24,653

Below median ($33,413)

Minor penalties assessed

Chain: EDURO HEALTHCARE

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

The Ugly 35 deficiencies on record

3 life-threatening
Apr 2025 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

PASARR Coordination (Tag F0644)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to incorporate the recommendations from the PASARR Level II determinati...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to incorporate the recommendations from the PASARR Level II determination and the PASARR evaluation report into a resident's assessment, care planning, and transitions of care for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for PASARR. The facility failed to initiate an NFSS within 20 business days following the date the services was agreed upon in the IDT meeting. This failure could cause residents with mental health disorders and psychiatric conditions to have a delay in services or not receive specialized services or equipment that may be needed. Findings included: Record review of the admission Record for Resident #1 documented a [AGE] year old female admitted to the facility 09/27/24 with a diagnoses of cerebral palsy (a group of neurological disorders that affect movement, balance, and posture often due to brain damage before, during or shortly after birth), major depressive disorder (a mental health condition characterized by persistent feelings of sadness and a loss of interest or pleasure), and anxiety disorder (a group of mental health conditions characterized by excessive worry, fear, and avoidance behaviors that significantly interfere with daily life). Record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 12 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. During an interview on 04/30/25 at 2:27 p.m., Resident #1, was asked how she liked therapy. Resident #1 was in the therapy room laying on a mat during the conversation after giving approval to talk with surveyor. Resident #1 stated it was OK but felt that life was generally boring since everything here is for old people. Resident #1 acknowledged that she was getting a new wheelchair. When asked if anyone from the PASARR local office ever took her out of the facility, she said no but stated she might like to go out. During an interview on 04/29/25 at 3:02 p.m., the MDS Coordinator stated they had the required IDT meetings with the local authority. There was a delay in getting Resident #1 started on therapy services and getting a new wheelchair since she had not been approved by Medicaid. The MDS Coordinator stated the facility was in contact with the case manager but her case was considered pending until her Medicaid was approved. The PASARR person in State Office was in contact with the Administrator and Director of Nurses but told them she would report the issue to regulatory since they did not start services within 20 days of the IDT meeting. During an interview with the Director of Rehabilitation (DOR) on 04/29/25 at 3:15 p.m., he stated that Resident #1 is now on all 3 therapies which included Physical therapy, Occupational therapy, and Speech therapy. The DOR stated they were going to start in October 2024 but had to wait until Resident #1's Medicaid was approved so she started services in February. During an interview with the Administrator on 4/29/25 at 3:45 p.m., she stated she was communicating with the PASARR office until a new MDS Coordinator was hired in December. The ADM stated she tried to tell the PASARR office that they could not start services until Resident #1's LTCMI was showing that resident was approved for long term care Medicaid since PASARR is a Medicaid service. ADM stated that the MDS Coordinator who is now working will ensure that communication is maintained with the PASARR office. During an interview with the BOM on 4/30/25 at 11:25 a.m., the BOM stated the facility was waiting for Resident #1's Medicaid to be transferred from community Medicaid to Long Term Care Medicaid. Resident #1 was finally eligible for Medicaid in February 2025 so they were able to bill for Medicaid services including the custom wheelchair. During an interview with the LIDDA case manager on 04/30/25 at 3:56 p.m., stated if the facility is aware that Medicaid is not started, then we shouldn't put it in the system. When asked how a facility could prevent this situation which is resulting in a citation, the case manager said the service should have been put in TMHP as discontinued or pending until Medicaid was started. The case manager said they had offered ILS and Day Hab services to Resident #1 but so far she had refused. The case manager said they would continue to encourage her to take advantage of these services. The Administrator provided the admission Criteria policy dated March 2019 that included: 9. All new admissions and readmissions are screened for mental disorders (MD), intellectual disabilities (ID) or related disorders per the Medicaid Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) process. c. Upon completion of the Level II evaluation, the State PASARR representative determines if the individual has a physical or mental condition, what specialized or rehabilitative services he or she needs, and whether placement in the facility is appropriate. d. The State PASARR representative provides a copy of the report to the facility. e. The interdisciplinary team determines whether the facility is capable of meeting the needs and services of the potential resident that are outlined in the evaluation.
Sept 2024 3 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pharmacy Services (Tag F0755)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide routine drugs and biologicals to its residents...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide routine drugs and biologicals to its residents or obtain them under an agreement and failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 3 of 7 residents (Residents #44, #51, and #52) reviewed for pharmacy services. 1. Resident #44 was administered her ordered supplement and shared it with Resident #52 while the nurse was not present. 2. Resident #51 did not receive her ordered doses of Velphoro (A medication used for people receiving dialysis to bind phosphates in the blood for excretion to prevent excess build up, the chewable tablets are 500mg) from 8/26/24 to 8/30/24, 9/3/24, and 9/4/24. These failures could put residents at risk of not receiving the therapeutic effects of their ordered medications and supplements, adverse reactions, exacerbation of illness, and a general decline in health. The findings were: 1. Record review of Resident #44's face sheet dated 9/6/24 revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included unspecified dementia, moderate with other behavioral disturbance (general term for loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities that are severe enough to interfere with daily life), anemia unspecified (condition of not having enough healthy red blood cells or hemoglobin to carry oxygen to the body's tissues.), and unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition (a disorder caused by a lack of proper nutrition or an inability to absorb nutrients from food). Record review of Resident #44's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a BIMS score of 2 indicating the resident had severe cognitive impairment. The resident had unclear speech and was able to be understood only sometimes and was only sometimes able to understand. The resident only required set-up or clean up assistance with eating and had malnutrition but no significant weight gain or loss. Record review of Resident #44's care plan undated revealed a focus initiated on 2/2/21 and revised on 1/19/24 for nutritional problem and included shake supplements with lunch and dinner interventions were to administer medications as ordered and to observe and document effectiveness and to observe diet and intake and to record the amount consumed. Record review of Resident #52's face sheet dated 9/6/24 revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included unspecified dementia, and cognitive communication deficit. Record review of Resident #52's Physician orders revealed no order for 2cal supplement. During an observation and interview on 9/3/24 at 12:50 p.m. Resident #44 was seated at a table in the dining room and had a clear plastic cup with measurements on it with a thicker brown liquid (appeared to be a shake supplement. unable to read the measurement but was approximately 100ml). The resident took two sips from the cup and set it on the table and slid it across the table towards a resident sitting directly across from her. Resident #52 picked up the cup, took a drink and set it down, picked it back up and took another drink then set it back on the table and slid it back towards Resident #44. Resident #44 took another drink and slid it back towards the other resident who took another drink and slid it back towards Resident #44 who then finished it. The nurse was not present with Resident #44. LVN A did arrive and witnessed the residents sharing the supplement and stated it was Resident #44's ordered supplement and she had given it Resident #44. Record review of Resident #44's physician orders revealed an order with a start date of 2/26/24 for 2 cal supplement (high calorie-480 calories per 8 ounces and high protein- 20grams per 8 ounces of supplement) 90ml three times daily. Record review of Resident #44's EMAR for September 2024 revealed 2 cal supplement was administered to the resident by LVN A for both the 9 a.m. and 1 p.m. doses on 9/2/24 and 9/3/24. Record review of Resident #44's EHR revealed no significant weight loss or ill effects from not drinking all her supplement. Record review of the Resident #52's EHR revealed no allergies to the supplement, no significant weight losses or gains, and no ill effects from the sharing of the supplement. In an interview on 9/3/24 at 1:15 p.m. LVN A stated possible consequences of the residents sharing the supplement was a possible infection control issue. LVN A stated she was familiar with both residents and there were no allergies or ill side effects from the sharing. LVN A further stated she usually stays and watches Resident #44 drink her supplement and further stated Resident #44 does not usually sit at a table with other residents. In an interview on 9/6/24 at 10:40 a.m. LVN A stated she had never witnessed Resident #44 share her supplement or attempt to and Resident #52 did not usually sit at that table and Resident #44 usually finished all her supplement. 2. Record review of Resident #51's face sheet dated, revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with readmissions on 12/16/23 and latest readmission on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD- medical condition in which the kidneys cease functioning on a permanent basis leading to the need for long-term dialysis or a kidney transplant to maintain life), and dependence on renal dialysis (treatment for people whose kidneys are failing to remove waste products and excess fluid from the blood). Record review of Resident #51's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had a BIMS score of 8 indicating the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. The resident had clear speech and was usually understood by others and usually understood others. The resident had ESRD and was dependent on renal dialysis. Record review of Resident #51's undated care plan revealed a focus for alteration in kidney function, ESRD, dialysis initiated on 12/17/23 and revised on 8/28/24 with interventions that included resident was on a renal diet and 1 liter fluid restriction, as ordered by Physician and to encourage patient to follow nutritional and hydration program. interventions. Record review of Resident #51's physician orders revealed an order with a start date of 8/26/24 for velphoro chewable tablet. Give 1 tablet by mouth before meals related to ESRD. Record review of Resident #51's EMAR for August 2024 revealed velphoro chewable tablet to be given before meals at 6:30 a.m., 11:30 a.m., and 4:30 p.m. was documented as not administered on 8/26/24 at 4:30 p.m., and on 8/27/24, 8/28/24, 8/29/24and 8/30/24 for all three doses on those days. Further review revealed it was documented as given to the resident for all three doses on 8/31/24. Record review of Resident #51's EMAR for September 2024 revealed velphoro chewable tablet to be given before meals at 6:30 a.m., 11:30 a.m., and 4:30 p.m. was documented as not administered on 9/3/24 at 4:30 p.m. and not administered on 9/4/24 at 6:30 a.m. Further review revealed it was documented as on hold from 9/4/24 at 11:30 a.m. to 9/7/24 at 6:30 a.m. Record review of Resident #51's progress notes revealed EMAR linked notes for velphoro were dated 8/26/24 at 7:54 p.m. the velphoro was pending delivery. On 8/27/24 at 9:00 a.m. medication on order, 8/27/24 12:43 p.m. pending arrival from pharmacy, 8/27/24 4:08 p.m. pending arrival from pharmacy. On 8/28/24 at 7:36 a.m. medication on order, pending arrival, charge nurse will call today on medication, 8/28/24 at 7:53 p.m. medication pending arrival, 8/29/24 at 8:35 a.m. and 12:14 p.m. medication n/a (not applicable) at this time, pending approval through pharmacy, DON, and charge nurse aware. On 8/30/24 at 10:00 a.m., 4:06 p.m., and 6:08 p.m. medication pending arrival from pharmacy. On 9/3/24 at 3:33 p.m. reordered medication, pending arrival from pharmacy. On 9/4/at 6:53 a.m. medication on order, pending arrival, charge nurse aware. Record review of Resident #51's physician orders revealed an order with a start date of 9/4/24 to hold velphoro. Record review of Resident #51's EHR revealed no abnormal lab work or other effects from not receiving her Velphoro phosphorous binder. In an interview on 9/6/24 at 10:40 a.m. LVN A stated Resident #51's velphoro was waiting on insurance approval through the pharmacy and when it was delivered, only 9 tablets were delivered and waiting on insurance approval again. But the pharmacy had delivered again. LVN A stated the physician had been contacted and the dialysis center and physician as well. LVN A stated there had been no ill effects of the resident not receiving doses of the ordered medication. In an interview on 9/6/24 at 10:45 a.m. the DON stated she was aware of Resident #51's velphoro not being available .The DON stated Resident #51's primary care physician had ordered Velphoro but a delay occurred because she was waiting on the resident's renal dialysis physician's approval to use the medication. Then there was an issue with the resident's insurance, but the facility did receive a partial order from the pharmacy . The DON stated a different phosphate binder had been approved through the insurance and pharmacy, but they were waiting on the approval of the resident's renal physician along with the proper dosage for the medication as the dosages were not interchangeable. The DON stated the resident was being monitored and the dialysis center was also aware, and the facility had received another partial order and the resident would be getting that until they received new orders. Review of the facility policy on administering medications revised April 2019 indicated . 4. Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders .26. Medications ordered for a particular resident may not be administered to another resident, unless permitted by state law and facility policy, and approved by the Director of Nursing Services. Review of the facility policy on pharmacy services revised April 2019 indicated . The provider pharmacy shall agree to provide services that comply with applicable facility policies and procedures; accepted professional standards of practice, and laws and regulations, including but not limited to . a help the facility identify needed supplies and services related to medications; c. Help the facility comply with its legal and regulatory requirements related to medications and medication management . h. Establish a reliable way to notify the facility in a timely fashion of issues and concerns related to medications and prescriptions; Review of the National Library of Medicine website accessed 9/10/24 at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10695651/#:~:text=Most%20patients%20receiving%20dialysis%20rely,is%20associated%20with%20increased%20mortality published online October 23, 2023, revealed . Most patients receiving dialysis rely on dietary restriction and phosphate binders to minimize the risk of hyperphosphatemia (high phosphorous blood level), which is associated with increased mortality. However, dietary restriction is difficult because of hidden phosphate additives in processed foods and medications.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility were...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, and include the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date when applicable for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #25) reviewed for pharmacy services. Resident #25's tube feeding bag was not labeled with the correct date, did not have the resident's name, time hung, or date and time to be taken down. This failure could put residents at risk of not receiving the correct tube feeding and could result in decreased continuity of care, and a general decline in health. The findings were: Record review of Resident #25's face sheet dated, revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with hospice care. Her diagnoses included other cerebral infarction (also known as a stroke-refers to damage to tissues in the brain due to a loss of oxygen to the area, adult failure to thrive (a state of decline that is multifactorial and may be caused by chronic concurrent diseases and functional impairments. Manifestations of this condition include weight loss, decreased appetite, poor nutrition, and inactivity), moderate protein calorie malnutrition (a disorder caused by a lack of proper nutrition or an inability to absorb nutrients from food), and cachexia (weakness and wasting of the body due to severe chronic illness). Record review of Resident #25's admission MDS dated [DATE] revealed the resident the resident was unable to complete the BIMS and her cognitive skills were severely impaired. The resident was unable to respond and was dependent on staff for all turning and positioning, and the resident had a gastrostomy feeding tube. Record review of Resident #25's undated care plan revealed a focus initiated on 7/29/24 and revised on 8/14/24 for alteration in diet for gastrostomy feedings. Interventions included to give diet as ordered of Jevity 1.5 cal at 40ml/hour for 22 hours with 120ml flushes every 4 hours. Record review of Resident #25's physician orders revealed an order with a start date of 8/5/24 for Jevity 1.5 cal at 40ml/hour x 22 hours with 120ml flushes every 4 hours. During an observation on 9/3/24 at 11:30 a.m. Resident #25's the tube feeding was running via a pump at 40ml/hr, the feeding bag was clear and had blue ball point pen writing on it 9/8/23 Jevity 1.5 and the room # next to the room number on the feeding bag was a possible cursive capital G but unable to read. Record review of Resident #25's EMAR for September 2024 revealed the Jevity feeding was hung as ordered on 9/3/24 at 6:00 a.m. In an observation and interview on 9/3/24 at 11:40am, the ADON stated the bags were not labeled correctly and it should be dated for 9/3/24 not 9/8/23 and she would be correcting it as soon as possible. The ADON was unsure of how the bags were not labeled correctly and stated they should have the correct date, resident, formula, and rate it was to be administered. The ADON returned with new bags with proper labels with the correct date and information. Review of the facility policy on enteral feedings revised November 2018 indicated . h. Check the enteral nutrition label against the order before administration. Check the following information: resident name, ID and room number; type of formula; date and time formula was prepared; route of delivery; access site; method (pump, gravity, syringe); and rate of administration(ml/hr). 2. On the formula label document initials, date, and time the formula was hung.
MINOR (C)

Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact

Deficiency F0912 (Tag F0912)

Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents

Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide a minimum of 80 square feet per resident in 43 of 43 resident rooms (A2 through A8, A10, B3 through B11, C2 through C5, C7, C9, C10,...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide a minimum of 80 square feet per resident in 43 of 43 resident rooms (A2 through A8, A10, B3 through B11, C2 through C5, C7, C9, C10, D2 through D7, E2 through E4, E6 through E8, and F1 through F8) reviewed for minimum for square footage per resident, in that: Resident rooms A2 through A8, A10, B3 through B11, C2 through C5, C7, C9, C10, D2 through D7, E3 through E6 through E8, and F1 through F8 did not have a minimum of 80 square feet per resident. This deficient practice could affect residents residing in rooms due to the reduced living space for the residents and could pose problems in the residents' activities of daily living. The findings were: Record review of previous room waiver, dated 09/06/2024,revealed the following: Resident rooms A2, A3, A5 through A8, and A10 measured 13 feet 7 inches by 11 feet 5 inches which provided 157.55 square feet of floor space. Dividing the 157.55 square feet of usable floor space by 2 resulted in 78.77 square feet of floor space per resident in these rooms. Room A4 measured 13 feet 6 inches by 11 feet 7 inches which provided 159.12 square feet of usable floor space. Dividing the 159.12 square feet of usable floor space by 2 resulted in 79.56 square feet of floor space per resident in this room. Room B3 measured 13 feet 6 inches by 11 feet 10 inches which provided 150.96 square feet of floor space. Dividing the 150.96 square feet of usable floor space by 2 resulted in 75.48 square feet of floor space per resident in this room. Rooms B4 through B6, B8 through B11, C7, C9, D4, E4, E7 and E8 measured 13 feet 6 inches by 11 feet 5 inches which provided 156.4 square feet of floor space. Dividing the 156.4 square feet of usable floor space by 2 resulted in 78.2 square feet of floor space per resident in these rooms. Room B7, C4, D3, and F7 measured 13 feet 6 inches by 11 feet 6 inches which provided 157.76 square feet of floor space. Dividing the 157.76 square feet of usable floor space by 2 resulted in 78.88 square feet of floor space per resident in these rooms. Room C2, C3, and C5 measured 13 feet 5 inches by 11 feet 5 inches which provided 155.25 square feet of floor space. Dividing the 155.25 square feet of usable floor space by 2 resulted in 77.63 square feet of floor space per resident in these rooms. Room C10, E5, F2, F3, F5, F6. and F8 measured 13 feet 7 inches by 11 feet 5 inches which provided 158.92 square feet of floor space. Dividing the 158.92 square feet of usable floor space by 2 resulted in 79.46 square feet of floor space per resident in these rooms. Room D2, D5 through D7, E3. and E6 measured 13 feet 7 inches by 11 feet 6 inches which provided 157.55 square feet of floor space. Dividing the 157.55 square feet of usable floor space by 2 resulted in 78.77 square feet of floor space per resident in these rooms. Room F4 measured 13 feet 4 inches by 11 feet 4 inches which provided 152.76 square feet of floor space. Dividing the 152.76 square feet of usable floor space by 2 resulted in 76.38 square feet of floor space per resident in this room. An interview with Administrator on 09/06/2024 at 11:02 a.m., revealed Administrator would be requesting a room waiver on the same rooms from last year which did not provide residents with 80 square feet of floor space. Record review of Form 3740, Bed Classifications, provided by the Administrator on 09/03/2024 revealed that all resident rooms were double occupancy.
Aug 2024 2 deficiencies 1 IJ
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the environment was as free of accident hazard...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the environment was as free of accident hazards as is possible and each resident receives adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #1) reviewed for accidents and hazards, in that: Resident #1 was able to exit the facility without staff knowing on 08/13/2024. Staff were unaware that Resident #1 had walked out of the facility until they received a call from local police informing them Resident #1 was with the Police at a restaurant located .3 miles from the facility. An IJ was identified on 08/27/2024. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 06:45 PM. While the IJ was removed on 08/29/2024, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a severity level of no actual harm with the potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy because the facility needed to evaluate the effectiveness of their corrective actions. This failure could place residents at risk of accidents that could result in serious injury, harm, impairment, or death. Findings were: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 08/27/24, revealed Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old female diagnosed with dementia originally admitted to the facility 03/01/2021. Record review of Resident #1's MDS assessment, dated 08/08/2024, revealed Resident #1 had a BIMS score of 5. Resident #1 used a walker when ambulating. Record review of Resident #1's care plan, dated 06/03/2024, revealed Resident #1 was identified as an elopement risk with no exit seeking behaviors. One intervention was identified as involve resident in group activities. Record Review of Resident #1's Elopement Risk Assessment, dated 06/12/2024, revealed Resident #1 was identified as At Risk for elopement with a score of 5. Resident #1's Elopement Risk Assessment was marked Yes for questions 1. Does the resident have a diagnosis of Dementia, OBS, Alzheimer's, Intellectual/ Developmental Disability, Delusions, Hallucinations, Anxiety Disorder, Depression, Bipolar, and/or Schizophrenia?, 2.Does the resident ambulate independently, with or without the use of an assistive device? (i.e. walker, cane or wheelchair)?, 3. Does the resident have any hearing, vision or communication problems?, 7. Is the resident cognitively impaired with poor decision-making skills (i.e. disorientation, cognitive deficits, disorganized thinking)?, 10. Does the resident display wandering without a sense of purpose (i.e. going in and out of other resident's rooms and explore their belongings, confused, aimless movements)?. The incident Record review of facility in-service training named Abuse & Neglect, Elopement/Wandering, and ensuring doors closed after letting visitors in/out, dated 8/13/2024, revealed 67 staff had signed the in-service. Record review of facility's employee roster revealed the facility had 75 employees. Record review of staff's clock-ins revealed 68 staff had worked from the time Resident #1 eloped from the facility on 08/13/2024 (around 9:00 PM) to morning shift (6 AM to 2 PM) on 08/27/2024. Out of the 68 staff who worked, 16 staff had not signed the in-service. Interview with DON on 08/27/2024 at 10:24 AM revealed Resident #1 eloped from the facility on 08/13/2024. DON stated that the medication aide passed Resident #1's medications about 9:00 PM and then asked resident if she wanted to go lay down. Resident #1 then walked to her room and entered. DON stated that Resident #1 was not seen leaving the facility and the staff were unaware that Resident #1 had left until the local police called the facility. Local police informed the facility that Resident #1 was with them at a restaurant .3 miles from the facility. Local police returned Resident #1 to the facility around 9:30 PM. DON stated that she completed a head-to-toe assessment on Resident #1 and then started to in-service on Abuse/Neglect, Elopement/wandering and ensuring doors are closed with all staff that were on shift. Interview with Administrator on 08/27/2024 at 10:34 AM revealed Resident #1 eloped from the facility on 08/13/2024 after receiving her 9:00 PM medications. Administrator stated the facility received a call from the local police informing them Resident #1 was at a restaurant .3 miles from the facility and would be escorted back to the facility. Administrator stated that resident was returned to the facility about 9:30 PM by local police. Administrator stated she was unsure how resident was able to elope from the facility but speculated that Resident #1 followed another resident's family out of the facility. Administrator stated that resident did not have exit seeking behaviors prior to her elopement. Interview with Resident #1's responsible party on 08/27/2024 at 11:30 AM revealed Resident #1 had been at the facility since 2021. Resident #1's responsible party stated Resident #1 had never had exit seeking behaviors. Resident #1's responsible party stated that Resident #1 was happy at the facility and had never expressed concerns with her care. Observation of all facility exit doors on 08/27/2024 starting at 11:45 AM revealed all exit doors were locked and unlocked with a keypad. All exit door alarms were working properly. Observation of Resident #1 on 08/27/2024 at 12:15 PM revealed resident sitting in the living room close to nursing station. Resident had a small band with a white square (wander guard) on her left ankle. Interview attempted with Resident #1 on 08/27/2024 at 12:16 PM revealed resident was confused and unable to answer surveyor's questions. Resident #1 was unable to tell surveyor the day of the week or what she had for breakfast. Interview with MA D on 08/27/2024 at 2:17 PM revealed Resident #1 received her medications on 08/13/2024 just after 9 PM and then went back to her room. MA D stated she did not see Resident #1 leave her room or the facility the night she eloped. Resident #1 was returned to the facility by local police around 9:30 PM. MA D stated the facility exit doors are locked and have an alarm when opened without being unlocked. MA D stated resident had no exit seeking behaviors prior to her elopement. This was determined to be an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 08/27/2024 at 6:45 PM. Administrator was provided with the IJ template on 08/27/2024. The following Plan of Removal was accepted on 08/28/2024 at 1:13 PM. Plan of Removal: PLAN OF REMOVAL FOR IMMEDIATE JEOPARDY To Whom it May Concern, Summary of details which leads to outcomes. On August 27, 2024 an investigation was initiated at [facility name and address]. At approximately 6:45p.m on August 27, 2024 a surveyor provided verbal notification that Texas Health and Human Services had determined the conditions at [the facility] constitute immediate jeopardy to resident health and safety. The Immediate Jeopardy findings were identified in the following areas: F-0689 - Free of Accident Hazards/Supervision/Devices Immediate Corrections Implemented for Removal of Immediate Jeopardy. On August 13,2024 at approximately 9:20pm Resident#1 returned to the facility from the Emergency Department. Action: Resident #1 is a current resident and was brought back to facility on 8/13/2024. The director of nursing reassessed Resident #1 for Elopement risk and Wander guard was placed 8/15/2024 to monitor for resident exiting facility. IDT reviewed and interventions initiated, and care plan updated reflect elopement risk. On August 27, 2024, at approximately 7:00pm the following actions were taken; Action: Education initiated Elopement risk, Abuse/Neglect/Exploitation, Signs to watch for with residents exhibiting potential for elopement, increased wandering, exit seeking, increased behaviors. Education will be completed prior to staff working the next scheduled shift, and ongoing with general orientation for all new hires. Start Date: 8/27/2024 Completion Date: 8/27/2024 Responsible: Director of Nursing/designee Action: Administrator validated that exit doors are functioning with wander guard system for notification of opening doors and residents attempting to exit that have been identified as High risk of elopement. Start Date: 8/27/2024 Completion Date: 8/27/2024 Responsible: Administrator/Designee IDENTIFICATION OF OTHER AFFECTED: All residents have the potential to be affected. Action: Completed Elopement Risk Assessment on all residents and validated all residents at risk of elopement, score of 3 or greater, have appropriate interventions and plan of care in place per risk assessment. Start Date: 8/27/2024 Completion Date: 8/27/2024 Responsible: Director of nursing/designee SYSTEMIC CHANGES AND/OR MEASURES: Action: In-service and education was provided to facility staff regarding the process for residents who have been identified as an elopement risk and proper steps to take to assure residents remain safe without risk for elopement, including monitoring, care plan updates, wander guards as indicated. Start Date: 8/27/2024 Completion Date: Ongoing until all staff have received education prior to their next scheduled shift. Responsible Party: Director of Nursing/Designee Action: Signage to be placed at exit door to notify all persons exiting to watch for residents to assure they are not followed out by potentially wandering or unsafe residents. Start Date: 8/28/2024 Completion Date: 8/28/2024 Responsible Party: Administrator Action: Education was provided to all staff on Elopement policy, Abuse/Neglect/Exploitation. Start Date: 8/27/2024 Completion Date: 8/27/2024 and Ongoing until staff have received training prior to the start of their next shift. Responsible Party: Director of Nursing/Designee Action: Ad hoc QAPI meeting held with IDT team and MD to review policy on Elopement, Abuse and neglect, and Plan of removal/response to Immediate Jeopardy Citation on 8/27/2024 Start Date: 8/27/2024 Completion Date: 8/27/2024 Responsible: Administrator/Designee Tracking and Monitoring Director of Nursing/Designee will review residents with At Risk for wandering or elopement identified or newly admitted with history of elopements to assure appropriate interventions and plan of care are in place 5 times per week beginning 8/28/2024 for 12 weeks or until sufficient compliance if found. This will be documented in daily clinical meeting with use of electronic log and reviewed monthly in QAPI meeting. Director of Nursing/Designee will complete audits for those residents who wear a wander guard to ensure electronic monitoring device is functioning every shift for 7 days beginning 8/28/2024 then will monitor electronic monitoring devices daily 5 times per week for 12 weeks or until sufficient compliance if found. This will be documented in daily clinical meeting with use of electronic log and reviewed monthly in QAPI meeting. Administrator/designee will complete random audit every shift for 7 days, beginning 8/28/2024 for appropriate staff response to wandering or potentially exit seeking residents, immediate education will be provided, if necessary, then will monitor random shifts, 5 times a week for 12 weeks or until sufficient compliance if found. This will be documented on log to be reviewed in QAPI Meeting Monthly. Administrator/designee will complete audit of exits for proper functioning of doors, alarms and wander guard system for proper functioning every shift for 7 days, beginning 8/28/2024 then will monitor random shifts, 5 times a week for 12 weeks or until sufficient compliance if found. This will be documented on log to be reviewed monthly in QAPI. Any trends or concerns were/will be addressed with Quality Assurance Performance Committee and continue until a lessor frequency deemed appropriate through QAPI review Verification: Interview with Administrator on 08/28/2024 at 1:25 PM revealed the facility started in-servicing its staff on 08/27/24. Administrator stated the facility would continue to in-service its staff prior to the start of their shifts until all staff have been in-serviced. Administrator also stated the DON started to re-assess all residents on their elopement risk and would be complete on 08/29/2024. Administrator stated she hung signs on all exit doors instructing anyone exiting to ensure that residents do not follow them out. Administrator stated she tested all exit doors to ensure the alarms and wander guards worked properly. Observation of the facility's exit doors on 08/28/2024 starting at 1:45 PM revealed all 8 exit doors had a sign that read Caution For the safety of our residents please ensure doors properly close behind you. All exit doors were locked, and alarm sounded when release bar was pressed. Interview with Administrator on 08/29/2024 at 9:54 AM revealed DON and Administrator worked on re-assessing the residents to identify those at risk for elopement. Administrator stated she was reviewing care plans for residents identified as at risk for elopement and ensuring care plans included interventions to prevent elopement. Interview with LPN A on 08/29/2024 at 9:24 AM revealed they received training before their next shift after the IJ was identified on 08/27/2024. Inservice was on Abuse & Neglect, Elopement/Wandering, ensuring doors closed after letting visitors in/out. LPN A was able to demonstrate an understanding of the in-service materials. Interview with RN B on 08/29/2024 at 9:35 AM revealed they received training before their next shift after the IJ was identified on 08/27/2024. Inservice was on Abuse & Neglect, Elopement/Wandering, ensuring doors closed after letting visitors in/out. RN B was able to demonstrate an understanding of the in-service materials. Interview with CNA C on 08/29/2024 at 9:52 AM revealed they received training before their next shift after the IJ was identified on 08/27/2024. Inservice was on Abuse & Neglect, Elopement/Wandering, ensuring doors closed after letting visitors in/out. CNA C was able to demonstrate an understanding of the in-service materials. Interview with MA D on 08/29/2024 at 10:17 AM revealed they received training before their next shift after the IJ was identified on 08/27/2024. Inservice was on Abuse & Neglect, Elopement/Wandering, ensuring doors closed after letting visitors in/out. MA D was able to demonstrate an understanding of the in-service materials. Interview with CNA E on 08/29/2024 at 10:32 AM revealed they received training before their next shift after the IJ was identified on 08/27/2024. Inservice was on Abuse & Neglect, Elopement/Wandering, ensuring doors closed after letting visitors in/out. CNA E was able to demonstrate an understanding of the in-service materials. Interview with LPN F on 08/29/2024 at 10:36 AM revealed they received training before their next shift after the IJ was identified on 08/27/2024. Inservice was on Abuse & Neglect, Elopement/Wandering, ensuring doors closed after letting visitors in/out. LPN F was able to demonstrate an understanding of the in-service materials. Interview with LPN G on 08/29/2024 at 10:52 AM revealed they received training before their next shift after the IJ was identified on 08/27/2024. Inservice was on Abuse & Neglect, Elopement/Wandering, ensuring doors closed after letting visitors in/out. LPN G was able to demonstrate an understanding of the in-service materials. Interview with MA H on 08/29/2024 at 11:08 AM revealed they received training before their next shift after the IJ was identified on 08/27/2024. Inservice was on Abuse & Neglect, Elopement/Wandering, ensuring doors closed after letting visitors in/out. MA H was able to demonstrate an understanding of the in-service materials. Interview with RN I on 08/29/2024 at 11:17 AM revealed they received training before their next shift after the IJ was identified on 08/27/2024. Inservice was on Abuse & Neglect, Elopement/Wandering, ensuring doors closed after letting visitors in/out. RN I was able to demonstrate an understanding of the in-service materials. Interview with CNA J on 08/29/2024 at 11:22 AM revealed they received training before their next shift after the IJ was identified on 08/27/2024. Inservice was on Abuse & Neglect, Elopement/Wandering, ensuring doors closed after letting visitors in/out. CNA J was able to demonstrate an understanding of the in-service materials. Interview with CNA K on 08/29/2024 at 11:22 AM revealed they received training before their next shift after the IJ was identified on 08/27/2024. Inservice was on Abuse & Neglect, Elopement/Wandering, ensuring doors closed after letting visitors in/out. CNA K was able to demonstrate an understanding of the in-service materials. Interview with CNA L on 08/29/2024 at 11:28 AM revealed they received training before their next shift after the IJ was identified on 08/27/2024. Inservice was on Abuse & Neglect, Elopement/Wandering, ensuring doors closed after letting visitors in/out. CNA L was able to demonstrate an understanding of the in-service materials. Interview with CNA M on 08/29/2024 at 11:31 AM revealed they received training before their next shift after the IJ was identified on 08/27/2024. Inservice was on Abuse & Neglect, Elopement/Wandering, ensuring doors closed after letting visitors in/out. CNA M was able to demonstrate an understanding of the in-service materials. Interview with Housekeeping N on 08/29/2024 at 11:32 AM revealed they received training before their next shift after the IJ was identified on 08/27/2024. Inservice was on Abuse & Neglect, Elopement/Wandering, ensuring doors closed after letting visitors in/out. Housekeeping N was able to demonstrate an understanding of the in-service materials. Interview with Housekeeping O on 08/29/2024 at 11:36 AM revealed they received training before their next shift after the IJ was identified on 08/27/2024. Inservice was on Abuse & Neglect, Elopement/Wandering, ensuring doors closed after letting visitors in/out. Housekeeping O was able to demonstrate an understanding of the in-service materials. Interview with DA P on 08/29/2024 at 11:42 AM revealed they received training before their next shift after the IJ was identified on 08/27/2024. Inservice was on Abuse & Neglect, Elopement/Wandering, ensuring doors closed after letting visitors in/out. DA P was able to demonstrate an understanding of the in-service materials. Interview with [NAME] Q on 08/29/2024 at 11:42 AM revealed they received training before their next shift after the IJ was identified on 08/27/2024. Inservice was on Abuse & Neglect, Elopement/Wandering, ensuring doors closed after letting visitors in/out. [NAME] Q was able to demonstrate an understanding of the in-service materials. Interview with DS R on 08/29/2024 at 11:43 AM revealed they received training before their next shift after the IJ was identified on 08/27/2024. Inservice was on Abuse & Neglect, Elopement/Wandering, ensuring doors closed after letting visitors in/out. DS R was able to demonstrate an understanding of the in-service materials. Interview with [NAME] S on 08/29/2024 at 11:46 AM revealed they received training before their next shift after the IJ was identified on 08/27/2024. Inservice was on Abuse & Neglect, Elopement/Wandering, ensuring doors closed after letting visitors in/out. [NAME] S was able to demonstrate an understanding of the in-service materials. Interview with Housekeeping T on 08/29/2024 at 11:48 AM revealed they received training before their next shift after the IJ was identified on 08/27/2024. Inservice was on Abuse & Neglect, Elopement/Wandering, ensuring doors closed after letting visitors in/out. Housekeeping T was able to demonstrate an understanding of the in-service materials. Interview with Human Resources Director U on 08/29/2024 at 11:50 AM revealed they received training before their next shift after the IJ was identified on 08/27/2024. Inservice was on Abuse & Neglect, Elopement/Wandering, ensuring doors closed after letting visitors in/out. Human Resources Director U was able to demonstrate an understanding of the in-service materials. Interview with CNA V on 08/29/2024 at 11:52 AM revealed they received training before their next shift after the IJ was identified on 08/27/2024. Inservice was on Abuse & Neglect, Elopement/Wandering, ensuring doors closed after letting visitors in/out. CNA V was able to demonstrate an understanding of the in-service materials. Interview with LPN W on 08/29/2024 at 11:54 AM revealed they received training before their next shift after the IJ was identified on 08/27/2024. Inservice was on Abuse & Neglect, Elopement/Wandering, ensuring doors closed after letting visitors in/out. LPN W was able to demonstrate an understanding of the in-service materials. Interview with Activities Director X on 08/29/2024 at 11:57 AM revealed they received training before their next shift after the IJ was identified on 08/27/2024. Inservice was on Abuse & Neglect, Elopement/Wandering, ensuring doors closed after letting visitors in/out. Activities Director X was able to demonstrate an understanding of the in-service materials. Interview with PT Assistant Y on 08/29/2024 at 12:00 PM revealed they received training before their next shift after the IJ was identified on 08/27/2024. Inservice was on Abuse & Neglect, Elopement/Wandering, ensuring doors closed after letting visitors in/out. PT Assistant Y was able to demonstrate an understanding of the in-service materials. Interview with [NAME] Z on 08/29/2024 at 12:04 PM revealed they received training before their next shift after the IJ was identified on 08/27/2024. Inservice was on Abuse & Neglect, Elopement/Wandering, ensuring doors closed after letting visitors in/out. [NAME] Z was able to demonstrate an understanding of the in-service materials. Interview with LPN AA on 08/29/2024 at 12:10 PM revealed they received training before their next shift after the IJ was identified on 08/27/2024. Inservice was on Abuse & Neglect, Elopement/Wandering, ensuring doors closed after letting visitors in/out. LPN AA was able to demonstrate an understanding of the in-service materials. Observation of the facility's wander guard system on 08/29/2024 at 3:02 PM revealed alarm sounds when resident got about 5 feet from the front door in the living room. The alarm turned off when resident moved closer to the nurse's station at the end of the living room. Record review of in-service training on Abuse & Neglect, Elopement/Wandering, ensuring doors closed after letting visitors in/out, dated 08/27/2024, on 08/29/2024 revealed 63 out of 69 staff have signed the in-service training. Record review of all resident's Elopement Risk assessments on 08/29/2024 revealed the facility re-assessed each resident's risk of eloping starting 08/27/2024. The facility completed the re-assessments on 08/29/2024. Record review of facility's monitoring logs on 08/29/2024 revealed DON/Designee reviewed resident's identified as elopement risk care plans for appropriate interventions on 08/28/2024 and 08/29/224. Record review of facility's monitoring logs on 08/29/2024 revealed DON/Designee completed audits for residents wearing wander guards on 08/28/2024 on all shifts and 08/29/2024 6 AM-2 PM shift. Record review of facility's monitoring logs on 08/29/2024 revealed Administrator/Designee completed random audits of staff's response to resident's wandering on 08/28/24 on each shift and on 08/29/2024 on the 6 AM-2 PM shift as well as the 2 PM- 10 PM shift. Record review of facility's monitoring logs on 08/29/2024 revealed Administrator/Designee reviewed completed audits of exit for proper functioning of door alarms and wander guard system on 08/28/2024 and 08/29/2024. The Administrator was informed the Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 08/29/2024 at 3:29 PM. The facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of potential for more than minimal harm that was not Immediate Jeopardy and a scope of isolated due to the facility's need to monitor the implementation of the plan of removal.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for infection control. CNA-AB failed to follow EBP by not wearing a gown while providing incontinent care for Resident #2 on 08/27/2024 This failure could place residents at risk for cross contamination and infection. Findings: Record review of Resident #2's face sheet dated 08//27/2024 revealed Resident #2 was a 76- year-old female who had an initial admission date of 06/22/2024 and a re-admission date of 08/14/2024 with diagnoses that included: MRSA (a bacterial infection that is resistant to certain antibiotics) as cause of disease classified elsewhere; Fracture of unspecified part of neck of right femur (region just below the ball of the hip joint); unspecified dislocation of unspecified hip; dementia; functional urinary incontinence; pressure ulcer of sacral region (portion of spine between lower back and tailbone) - stage 3; pressure ulcer of right buttock - stage2; and pressure ulcer of left buttock - stage 2. Record review of Resident #2's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #2 had a BIMS of 6, suggesting severe cognitive impairment and was coded under assistance needed for toileting as a 1, indicating total dependence on others. Record review of Resident #2's Physician Orders dated 08/27/24 revealed an order to Initiate isolation and educate resident/family and staff on handwashing, meals and activities and therapy in room while on isolation every shift r/t MRSA effective 07/23/2024. Record review of Resident #2's Care Plan dated 06/23/3034 revealed a focus area for .enhanced barrier precaution r/t pressure ulcer of sacral and buttocks, has surgical incision to right hip, with date initiated of 07/05/2024, and interventions which included: Don [put on] gown and gloves during high-contact resident care activities and Enhanced Barrier Precautions. Observation on 08/27/2024 at 11:08 a.m. in the hallway outside Resident #2's room, revealed a Contact Precautions sign posted on the door, and a small PPE supply storage unit outside the door. Observation of the contents inside this PPE supply storage unit revealed there were no gowns available. During an observation on 08/27/2024 at 11:11 a.m., CNA- AB was observed in Resident #2's room, in the process of tying a plastic trash bag, wearing gloves, but no gown. During an interview with CNA-AB at 08/27/2024 at 11:11a.m., CNA-AB stated she had just finished providing incontinent care to Resident #2 , and that she did not wear a gown while providing this incontinent care because there were no gowns available in the PPE supply drawer. CNA-AB further stated that she was aware that Resident #2 was on contact precautions and that she should have worn both a gown and gloves to provide the incontinence care. CNA-AB stated there were additional gowns available in the medical supply closet, but she did not go to supply closet to get a gown before entering Resident #2's room, because Resident #2 was asking to be changed and she did not want to make her upset by making her wait while she went to go get more gowns. CNA-AB stated that by not wearing both gown and gloves when she provided incontinent care to Resident #2, she could catch what she has. During an interview the DON on 08/28/2024 at 1:16 p.m., the DON confirmed that Resident #2 was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions due to MRSA, and that the sign posted outside of Resident #2 's room on 08/27/2024 should have been for EBP and not contact precautions. The DON noted that the correct EBP sign has now been placed on Resident #2's room, but also stated that both EBP and Contact precautions required use of both gown and gloves for high-contact activities such as incontinence care. The DON stated that adequate supply of PPE should be maintained in the PPE supply units outside rooms requiring enhanced-barrier precautions and that it was the responsibility of all the staff to ensure they were kept stocked. The DON stated that failure to use the correct PPE during high-contact activities could result in the spread of infection. The DON confirmed CNA-AB had received training in infection control procedures. Record review of CNA-AB's facility training record dated 06/17/2024 revealed CNA-AB had initialed her training record next to infection control, indicating she had receiving training on infection control procedures. Record review of the facility Enhanced Barrier Precautions policy dated August 2022 revealed EBP's employ targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities and gloves and gown are applied prior to performing the high contact resident care activity . The policy further includes examples of high-contact activities including .providing hygiene and changing briefs or assisting with toileting.
Oct 2023 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0558 (Tag F0558)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received services in the facility wi...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for 1 of 25 residents (Resident #20) reviewed for administration. The facility failed to ensure all staff providing direct care to residents in the facility identify themselves by name and job title. This failure could affect resident in the facility by placing them at risk of not having needs met. Findings included: During and observation upon entrance to the facility on [DATE] at 9:28 a.m. LVN F was not wearing a name tag while in a resident care area. During and observation upon entrance to the facility on [DATE] at 9:40 a.m CNA B was not wearing a name tag while in a resident care area. During and observation upon entrance to the facility on [DATE] at 9:45 a.m. MA C was not wearing a name tag while in a resident care area. During and observation upon entrance to the facility on [DATE] at 9:50 a.m. NA-A was not wearing a name tag while in a resident care area. During and observation upon entrance to the facility on [DATE] at 10:30 a.m. the DON was not wearing a name tag that identified her current role while in a resident care area. During an interview with Resident #1 on 10/21/2023 at 11:56 a.m., Resident #1 said she had a hard time hearing some staff and understanding them. She described a staff member providing care to her and said she did not know their name at first and then after seeing the staff member she learned their name after having several interactions while the staff member assisted her in her room. Resident #1 said she was finally able to remember the staff members name because when she was younger her brother had a dog with the same name. Resident #1 explained being hard of hearing made it difficult for her to understand staff sometimes so being able to see a name and their title helps. Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 10/22/2023, revealed an [AGE] year-old with diagnoses that included: bilateral hearing loss (hearing loss in both ears), Parkinson's disease (a brain disorder that causes unintended or uncontrollable movements, such as shaking, stiffness and difficulty with balance and coordination), need for personal assistance with personal care, and cognitive communication disorder. During an interview with LVN F on 10/21/2023 at 3:55 p.m. LVN F said she did not have a name tag on this morning when she opened the door for this surveyor to enter the facility, she said this was her second time to work at this facility and she had not been given a name tag. During an interview with CNA B on 10/21/2023 at 2:40 p.m. CNA B stated they were supposed to wear name tags but no one had given her one but sometimes the facility would give a name tag to staff if they forget their name tag and then explained the staff that did that before is not at the facility on the weekends. During an interview with MA C on 10/21/2023 at 3:01 p.m., MA C stated she had never been given a name tag by this facility but did have one that could be worn and went on to say everyone should wear name tags so the residents know who was providing care to them. During an interview with NA-A on 10/21/2023 at 3:50 p.m., NA-A said she was not wearing a name tag but she was supposed to wear a name tag, so the residents know who people are and what they do. During an interview with the DON on 10/21/2023 at 4:00 p.m., the DON had a name tag with her name and ADON on the name tag beside her name. When asked if she was the DON or the ADON, she said the DON and had not received a new name tag with DON. The DON said she had been the DON for over 6 months. During an interview with the Administrator on 10/21/2023 at 4:15 p.m., the Administrator said all staff are required to wear name tags. The Administrator went on to say the facility does have a policy on staff wearing name tags the staff are expected to follow the policy, so residents and families know who they are and what their roles are. The Administrator did have a plastic name tag sleeve on with her standard business card identifying her within the plastic sleeve and clipped to her shirt. The Administrator provided a policy, Identification Name Badges, with the following Policy Statement: In order to promote safety and security measures established by our facility, each employee must wear his/her identification name badge at all times while on duty. Policy revised January 2008.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0728 (Tag F0728)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record review the facility filed to ensure 1(NA A) of 3 Nurses' Aides were not working in the facility longer than four months without being enrolled in or having completed an a...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review the facility filed to ensure 1(NA A) of 3 Nurses' Aides were not working in the facility longer than four months without being enrolled in or having completed an approved training course. The facility failed to ensure NA A was certifed within the required time frame. This failure place residents at risk for receiving care from an individual whose skill level was not known. Findings include: Record review of the facility staff roster provided upon entrance revealed: Nurses' Aide A was listed at a Nursing Assistant with an 08/01/2022 hire date. During an interview with Nurses' Aide A on 10/21/2023 at 3:50 p.m. Nurses' Aide A explained previously taking the CNA written portion of the exam and not passing it. Nurses' Aide A explained she had not rescheduled the test since taking it in May 2022 and was waiting on the facility to register her for a CNA class. Nurses' Aide A explained she completes all services a Certified Nurses' Aide did in the facility. During an interview with HR specialist on 10/21/2023 at 4:40 p.m., HR specialist stated the Nurses' Aide did have a start date of employment at the facility on 03/01/ 2022 and did not know if she had taken any type of CNA test for certification but did know Nurses' Aide was listed on the staff list and in the facility records as a Nursing Assistant and not a CNA. During an interview with the DON on 10/21/2023 at 4:54 p.m., the DON said she did not think Nurses' Aide A was a CNA at this time and was not aware when or if Nurses' Aide previously took any type of CNA test. The DON explained the facility continued to allow Nurses' Aide because they had been given information on a PL that have approval for staff who had not completed a CNA course or testing an extension on the initial grace period granted during COVID- 19 (COVID-19- Corona Virus Disease- A severe acute respiratory syndrome aka SARS-COV-2). During an interview with the Administrator at 5:10 p.m. on 10/21/2023, the Administrator said Nurses' Aide A was a CNA at this time and was not aware when or if Nurses' Aide A previously took any type of CNA test or scheduled for any type of testing at this time. The Administrator explained the facility continued to allow the Nurses' Aide because they had been given information on a PL that have approval for staff who had not completed a CNA course or testing an extension on the initial grace period granted during COVID- 19. The Administrator provided an email on 10/22/2023 containing the following information: Work Experience and Training Requirements for Existing Temporary Nurse Aides Temporary nurse aides hired during the COVID-19 public health emergency were allowed under state regulations to use work experience and training obtained at a nursing facility to satisfy the 100-hour training requirement needed in order to take the exam for full certification. Per 26 TAC §556.100, these temporary nurse aides were required to test and become fully certified by Oct. 15, 2023 (four months following the end of the COVID-19 public health emergency). Beginning July 5, 2023, the online portal used by nurse aide applicants to request testing for certification has experienced some technical issues. Due to the delays caused by these unforeseen issues, HHSC will not enforce the Oct. 15, 2023, deadline but instead require certification before May 1, 2024. Until this date, a facility may continue to use temporary nurse aides who were hired and who completed their 100-hour training requirement before Oct. 15, 2023. Note: Federal regulations require that temporary nurse aides become certified within four months of their hire date. So, there may be some individuals who can apply the 100-hour work experience and training obtained while working as a temporary nurse aide towards the certification requirements but who still may be prohibited from working in a facility until they become certified. Nursing facilities must ensure that their temporary nurse aides register for testing and maintain documentation of registration and test dates on file. Any existing temporary nurse aides not certified before May 1, 2024, must complete a traditional Nurse Aide Training and Competency Evaluation Program (NATCEP) to be approved to take an exam and become certified.
Aug 2023 18 deficiencies 2 IJ
CRITICAL (J)

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Deficiency F0678 (Tag F0678)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to provide basic life support, including CPR to a reside...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to provide basic life support, including CPR to a resident requiring such emergency care prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel and subject to related physician orders and the resident's advance directives for 1 (Resident #61) of 29 residents reviewed for CPR, in that; Resident #61 was discovered unresponsive, assessed as full code, and provided CPR for 9 minutes without the use of an available an AED prior to 911 EMS's arrival at the resident's side. An IJ was identified on [DATE]. The IJ template was provided on [DATE] at 11:05 am. While the IJ was removed on [DATE], the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a severity level of actual harm that was not Immediate Jeopardy because the facility is still monitoring their effectiveness of their plan of removal. This failure placed residents at risk for harm up to and including death by the denial of all life saving measures as trained. The findings included: A record review of Resident #1's admission record dated, [DATE], revealed an admission date of [DATE] and a death discharge date of [DATE], with diagnoses which included altered mental status, extended spectrum beta lactamase resistance [a bacteria that can't be killed by many of the antibiotics that doctors use to treat infections, like penicillin's and some cephalosporins for urinary tract infections], and urinary tract infection. A record review of Resident #1's admission MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #61 was an [AGE] year-old male admitted from an acute care hospital for support and rehabilitation related to a urinary tract infection. A record review of Resident #61's physician's order dated [DATE] revealed RN R documented a physician's order for Resident #61 to receive care as Full Code. A record review of Resident #61's care plan dated [DATE], revealed, [Resident #61] has an advance Directive as evidenced by: Full code status Date Initiated: [DATE] [ .] wishes will be honored, Date Initiated: [DATE] [ .] CPR will be performed as ordered. A record review of Resident #61's SBAR document dated [DATE] revealed, Situation [ .] the change in condition, symptoms, or signs observed, and evaluated is/are: cardiac arrest, respiratory arrest. This started on: [DATE]. Since this started it has gotten: stayed the same [ .] Resident/Patient Evaluation [ .] mental status evaluation: unresponsiveness [ .] Code Status: Full Code [ .] Appearance, summarize your observations and evaluation: CNA notified this nurse of resident being unresponsive assessed resident not responsive no pulse RN supervisor notified initiated CPR crash cart access notified 911 CPR performed until paramedics arrived emergency medical technicians continued with CPR resident transfers out with Pulse unconscious accompanied by three emergency medical technicians [ .]. A record review of the EMS TripTix EMS Patient Care Record dated [DATE] revealed, CPR was performed by the facility staff for 9 minutes from 09:38 AM to 09:47 AM as evidenced by, Incident Date / Times [ .] unit notified by dispatch [DATE] 09:41 [AM] [ .] Unit En Route [DATE] 09:43 [AM] [ .] Unit Arrived on Scene [DATE] 09:45 [AM] [ .] Arrived at patient [DATE] 09:47 [AM] [ .] Unit left scene [DATE] 10:04 [AM] [ .] complaints and impressions; cardiac arrest, onset date and time [DATE] 09:38 [AM], [ .] AED used prior to EMS NO [ .] Further review revealed a summary which reflected the facility had performed CPR chest compressions and oxygenated rescue breathing but had not used the AED. The EMTs provided medications and applied the EMS AED and revealed Resident #61 had regained an irregular heartbeat after EMS care and medications administered intraosseous [directly into the bone marrow]. During an interview and observation on [DATE] at 02:28 PM the DON stated sometime in [DATE] Resident #61 was discovered unresponsive and was provided emergency CPR care. The DON stated she was not certain if the AED used. The DON proceeded to demonstrate the AED to the surveyor. The AED was stored on the facility's emergency crash cart along with CPR equipment such as an oxygen tank, and oxygen delivery equipment and included a suction pump with accessories. The DON demonstrated the AED as functional and stated the AED had not been used and could not recall the last time it had been used. The DON stated she believed LVN A, LVN B, and RN C were directly involved with Resident #1's CPR care. During an interview on [DATE] at 07:10 PM the DON provided updated information and stated she recalled the [DATE] CPR event for Resident #61 and stated the AED was not utilized, and EMS services arrived at the facility after the 911 call, approximately 4-5 minutes. The DON stated she did not know why the AED was not utilized and further stated EMS arrived quickly. The DON was asked to provide any further documentation to the event and did not provide further documentation. The DON stated LVN A, LVN B , and RN C were involved in the CPR event for Resident #61. During an interview on [DATE] at 07:40 PM LVN A stated on [DATE] around 09:30 AM to 10:00 AM CNAs AB and AC reported to her Resident #61 was unresponsive. LVN A stated she told the CNAs to get RN C and immediately arrived at Resident #61's bed side. LVN A stated she assessed Resident #61 as a full code and without a pulse and not breathing. LVN A stated she began emergency CPR with chest compressions and RN C arrived at the bedside quickly. LVN A stated RN C assumed chest compressions and told her to get the crash cart and call 911. LVN A stated she ran to retrieve the crash cart and along the way told LVN B to call 911. LVN A stated she returned to Resident #61 with the crash cart and resumed chest compressions while RN C administered oxygen with rescue breaths. LVN A stated 911 EMTs were at the bedside quickly around 4-7 minutes maybe. LVN A stated EMS took over and Resident #61 was assessed with a pulse and left for the hospital with EMS. LVN A stated she was trained for CPR by the American Heart Association . LVN A stated the AED was stored on the crash cart and was immediately available upon arrival at Resident #61's bedside. LVN A stated the AED was never opened, removed from the case, or from the crash cart. LVN A stated she was so involved in providing CPR chest compressions and rescue breaths she did not think about the AED. LVN A stated her training included the use of an AED during CPR as soon as the AED was available. During an interview on [DATE] at 06:00 AM RN C stated on [DATE] she worked from 06:00 AM to 02:00 PM. RN C stated she was providing patient care when CNAs AB and AC told her LVN A needed her, and Resident #61 was unresponsive. RN C stated she ran to Resident #61's bedside and assessed Resident #61 as unresponsive and told LVN A to get the crash cart and call 911. RN C stated she began CPR chest compressions. RN C stated LVN A returned with the crash-cart, and they switched CPR roles and LVN A continued chest compressions while RN C administered oxygenated rescue breaths. RN C stated 911 EMS arrived quickly and continued CPR. RN C stated the facility's AED was stored on the facility's crash-cart and was immediately available when the crash-cart arrived but she nor LVN A gave it a thought due to the high stress of providing CPR. RN C stated she and LVN A provided CPR for maybe 5 minutes and 911 arrived quickly. RN C stated she was CPR trained by the American Heart Association . RN C stated her training included the use of an AED during CPR as soon as the AED is available. A record review of the facility's Emergency Procedure Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation policy dated February 2018, revealed, Policy Statement; personnel have completed training on the initiation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation and basic life support including Defibrillation for victims of sudden cardiac arrest; general guidelines; the chances of surviving sudden cardiac arrest may be increased if CPR is initiated immediately upon collapse. Early delivery of a shock with a defibrillator plus CPR within 3 to 5 minutes of collapse can further increase chances of survival [ .] emergency procedure; cardiopulmonary resuscitation; [ .] when the AED arrives assess for need and follow AED protocol as indicated [ .]. A record review of the facility's Automatic External Defibrillator, Use and Care of, dated [DATE], revealed, Policy Interpretation and Implementation: The automatic external defibrillator (AED) will be used to try to restore normal cardiac rhythm when arrhythmia is strongly suspected .remove the device from its case .check the battery cartridge to ensure it is in place .remove the film seals from the pads .turn on the device and follow the prompts . A record review of the American Heart Association's website Part 3: Adult Basic and Advanced Life Support; 2020 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care https://cpr.heart.org/en/resuscitation-science/cpr-and-ecc-guidelines/adult-basic-and-advanced-life-support, accessed [DATE], revealed, Top 10 take home messages for adult cardiovascular life support: [ .] On recognition of a cardiac arrest event, a layperson should simultaneously and promptly activate the emergency response system and initiate cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Performance of high-quality CPR includes adequate compression depth and rate while minimizing pauses in compressions. Early defibrillation with concurrent high-quality CPR is critical to survival when sudden cardiac arrest [ .] Defibrillation is most successful when administered as soon as possible [ .]. A record review of the facility's in-service train the trainer, revealed, In-service Description: Rapid Response Policy, date: [DATE], Instructor Corp RN, in-service time: 1 hour.; the Administrator; the DON received CPR / AED training. Further review of the attached printed training revealed, [ .] the chances of surviving a sudden cardiac arrest maybe increased if CPR is initiated immediately upon collapse [ .] Early delivery of a shock with a defibrillator plus CPR within 3-5 minutes of collapse can further increase chances of survival [ .] Provide periodic mock codes for training purposes [ .] instruct a staff member to retrieve the automatic external defibrillators [ .] when the AED arrives, assess for need and followed protocols as indicated [ .] continue with CPR/BLS until emergency medical personnel arrive [ .] This was determined to be an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on [DATE] at 11:05 AM. ADMN AA was notified. ADMN AA was provided with the IJ template on [DATE]. The following Plan of Removal was accepted on [DATE] at 10:27 AM. Plan of Removal Date [DATE] PLAN OF REMOVAL FOR IMMEDIATE JEOPARDY To Whom it May Concern, Summary of details which leads to outcomes. On [DATE] an annual survey was initiated at [Facility name and address]. On [DATE], a surveyor provided an IJ Template notification that the Survey Agency has determined that the conditions at the center constitute immediate jeopardy to resident health. The notification of the alleged immediate jeopardy states as follows: F678 Quality of Life CPR The facility failed to provide Quality of life CPR care for Resident #61 in that it did not follow and provide basic life support, including CPR, to a resident requiring such emergency care prior to arrival of emergency medical personnel. Problem The Facility's Deficient practice revealed facility failed to provide basic life support, including CPR, to a resident requiring emergency care prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel. Immediate Corrections Implemented for Removal of Immediate Jeopardy. Once the facility was made aware of the deficient practice, the Director of Nursing/designee conducted an in-service with all staff on Mock Code, Rapid Response, AED, and CPR Training with emphasis on the expectation that the AED is retrieved immediately after checking for pulse and respirations. Residents identified at risk are those with Advanced Directives of Full Code status. The facility Director of Nursing/designee completed a 100% audit of residents advanced directive. This audit was completed on [DATE]. Residents who did not have a proper advanced directive were corrected immediately. Director of Nursing/Designee initiated education with clinical staff on [DATE] on proper protocol and procedure during a rapid response event and including timely retrieval and proper use of AED. This education was completed on [DATE]. The education was completed as a mock drill and monitored with DONs direct supervision and guidance to validate staff competency and understanding. Staff completed in-service training sheet. Identification of Others: Residents identified with full code status have the potential to be impacted by the alleged deficient practice. Director of nursing/designee completed mock code reviews with clinical staff to ensure adequate knowledge of resuscitation protocol. Systemic Changes The Director of Nursing/ designee initiated immediate training on Mock Codes, Rapid Response, AED, CPR and documentation of code process training to nursing staff on [DATE]. All education is at 100% completion as of [DATE]. The Director of Nursing/designee completed all education and training was started on [DATE] and will continue until all clinical staff have received training prior to the start of their work shift. The facility Director of Nursing, Corporate Clinical Director and Administrator met on [DATE] to evaluate the facility policy and procedures regarding Quality of Life and CPR Care. The Director of nursing/designee will complete education and training with all clinical staff on [DATE] and newly hired clinical staff over Mock Codes, Rapid Response, AED, CPR protocols and documentation of code process. The education will be provided by DON or designee with the necessary skill set related to CPR/ Rapid Response and proper documentation. The Administrator, DON, and designee will develop and ensure an ongoing long-term monitoring and oversight system is in place by [DATE] to review and address concerns related to the deficient practices identified in F678. Monitoring will include a system to ensure deficient practice is prevented. The monitoring and oversight system will ensure clinical staff are adequately trained to meet requirements of safe practice. Concerns identified will be provided by the DON or designee to the QAPI committee monthly, for a minimum of 6 months, for the discussion of sustaining compliance or correction of concerns identified. Monitoring The DON or designee will develop a short-term monitoring system for all areas of deficient practice identified for this deficiency. Monitoring will include a system to observe all clinical staff's adequate understanding of rapid response protocols on all shifts. Monitoring will be completed through direct observation, when possible, as well as through observation of mock codes. The monitoring will be documented on educational in-service forms and mock drills with staff's acknowledgment. The Director of Nursing/ designee will also conduct a chart review of any resident who has coded to validate that charting has been completed adequately and according to the education provided. This monitoring system will begin [DATE]. Data gathered will be measurable and monitoring will occur at least monthly and include weekend days and alternate shifts over the next 3 months and quarterly following. All concerns identified during the monitoring process will be addressed timely and documented for correction. The monitoring process, findings, and corrections will be presented to the facility QAPI committee each month for a minimum of 6 months for this plan of correction. Administrator will be responsible for monitoring DON compliance with system monthly. System compliance will be documented and discussed. The Administrator/designee will develop or ensure an ongoing long-term monitoring and oversight system is in place by [DATE] to review and address concerns related to the deficient practices identified in F678. Clinical Director of Operations will in-service Admin and DON over Rapid Response Policy and Procedure on [DATE]. Monitoring will be conducted monthly for 3 months to determine if compliance is being sustained. Sustained compliance or corrective actions will be discussed and documented in QAPI Meeting. The QAPI committee will meet monthly, and facility interdisciplinary team will meet daily to review the ongoing status of the corrections for this deficiency with the purpose to identify, evaluate, plan, implement, and address concerns or deficient practices identified as it relates, or to determine if compliance is being sustained. All corrections or steps taken and identified by QAPI will be documented and addressed immediately. Ad Hoc QAPI meeting will be held on [DATE] with the Medical Director, Administrator, Director of Nursing, and IDT to review and validate the plan of removal. Involvement of Medical Director The Director of Nursing notified the facility's Medical Director, of the Immediate Jeopardy tag on [DATE]. The Administrator will be responsible for implementation of ensuring the adequate process regarding Mock Code Monitoring. The new process/system was initiated on [DATE]. Please accept this letter as our plan of removal for determination of the alleged Immediate Jeopardy issued [DATE]. Plan Of Removal Verification Clinical Director of Operations will in-service Admin and DON over Rapid Response Policy and Procedure on [DATE]. Monitoring will be conducted monthly for 3 months to determine if compliance is being sustained. Sustained compliance or corrective actions will be discussed and documented in QAPI Meeting. A record review of the facility's in-service train the trainer, revealed, In-service Description: Rapid Response Policy, date: [DATE], Instructor Corp RN, in-service time: 1 hour.; the Administrator; the DON received CPR/AED training. Further review of the attached printed training revealed, .the chances of surviving a sudden cardiac arrest maybe increased if CPR is initiated immediately upon collapse .Early delivery of a shock with a defibrillator plus CPR within 3-5 minutes of collapse can further increase chances of survival .Provide periodic mock codes for training purposes .instruct a staff member to retrieve the automatic external defibrillators .when the AED arrives, assess for need and followed protocols as indicated .continue with CPR/BLS until emergency medical personnel arrive . The Director of Nursing/designee conducted an in-service with all nursing staff n Mock Code, Rapid Response, AED, and CPR Training with emphasis on the expectation that the AED is retrieved immediately after checking for pulse and respirations. Residents identified at risk are those with Advanced Directives of Full Code status. The Director of Nursing/designee initiated immediate training on Mock Codes, Rapid Response, AED, CPR and documentation of code process training with nursing staff on all shifts on [DATE]. All education was at 100% completion as of [DATE]. The Director of Nursing/designee-initiated education with clinical on all shifts on [DATE] on proper protocol and procedure during a rapid response event and including timely retrieval and proper use of AED. This education was completed on [DATE]. The education was completed as a mock drill and monitored with the DON's direct supervision and guidance to validate staff competency and understanding. Staff completed in-service training sheet. The Director of Nursing/designee completed all education and training was started on [DATE] and will continue until all clinical staff on all shifts have received training prior to the start of their work shift. A record review of the facility's nursing roster revealed 22 nurses were employed by the facility over all 3 shifts, 06:00 AM to 02:00 PM, 02:00 PM to 10:00 PM, and 10:00 PM to 06:00 AM. 22 of the 22 nurses on all shifts were interviewed for AED CPR training. And were able to identify and use of AED. During an observation of a mock CPR AED event on [DATE] at 01:06 p.m., revealed the ADMN AA called out to DON that a resident was unresponsive. The DON yelled out Code Blue and instructed RN R, LVN G, LVN Q and LVN E to follow her to the unresponsive mock resident's room. The DON then delegated responsibilities to each nurse and one nurse to go get the crash cart. The DON then proceeded to place a backboard under the mock resident while communicating out load he importance of the backboard and if there was no backboard then to place the unresponsive resident on the floor. The DON began compressions while counting out load to 30, followed by using the AMBU bag for the two breaths. The crash cart arrived during this time. The DON showed staff, while doing it, how to remove the AED from its case, opened the AED cover, which automatically began the verbal AED prompt protocols. The DON removed the AED pads from the case, attached the electrical pad leads to the AED, and placed the pads on the CPR mannequin, and continued to follow the AED verbal prompts. The DON stated to the mock CPR AED participants, Continue CPR with the AED until EMS arrives. During an interview on [DATE] at 01:08 AM LVN K stated she had received in person training for a mock CPR code event with specific training to include the immediate use of an AED as soon as the AED was presented. LVN K stated she received further training to include documentation to reflect the details and times of events for the CPR AED event. Interviews done on [DATE] During an interview on [DATE] at 1:15 p.m., LVN E stated she worked 6-2 and 2-10 shifts. LVN E stated she had received training on [DATE], to include instructions, for a mock CPR code event with specific training to include the immediate use of an AED as soon as the AED is presented. LVN E stated she received further training to include documentation to reflect the details and times of events for the CPR AED event. During an interview on [DATE] at 1:16 p.m., LVN G stated she worked 6-2 and 2-10 shifts. LVN G stated she had received training for a mock CPR code event with specific training to include the immediate use of an AED as soon as the AED is presented. LVN K stated she received further training to include documentation to reflect the details and times of events for the CPR AED event. During an interview on [DATE] at 1:18 p.m., RN C stated she worked 6-2 shifts. RN C stated she had received training for a mock CPR code event with specific training to include the immediate use of an AED as soon as the AED is presented. RN C stated she received further training to include documentation to reflect the details and times of events for the CPR AED event. During an interview on [DATE] at 1:19 p.m., LVN Q stated she worked 6-2 and 2-10 shifts. LVN Q stated she had received training on [DATE], to include instructions, for a mock CPR code event with specific training to include the immediate use of an AED as soon as the AED is presented. LVN Q stated she received further training to include documentation to reflect the details and times of events for the CPR AED event. During an interview on [DATE] at 1:20 p.m., RN R stated she worked 6-2 and 2-10 shifts. RN R stated she had received training for a mock CPR code event with specific training to include the immediate use of an AED as soon as the AED is presented. RN R stated she received further training to include documentation to reflect the details and times of events for the CPR AED event. During an interview on [DATE] at 01:33 PM LVN P stated she had received in-person training for CPR with the use of an AED during a mock CPR code event on [DATE]. LVN P stated the training included the immediate use of an AED as soon as the AED was presented on the crash cart. LVN P stated the training also focused on post documentation for the CPR event to include event time, description details, such as time CPR started, time AED used. During an interview on [DATE] at 1:55 p.m., LVN I stated he worked weekends and just started the previous weekend. LVN I stated he had received training on [DATE], to include instructions, for a mock CPR code event with specific training to include the immediate use of an AED as soon as the AED is presented. LVN I stated she received further training to include documentation to reflect the details and times of events for the CPR AED event. During an interview on [DATE] at 1:56 p.m., RN K stated she was one of the ADONs. RN K stated she had received training for a mock CPR code event with specific training to include the immediate use of an AED as soon as the AED is presented. RN K stated she received further training to include documentation to reflect the details and times of events for the CPR AED event. During an interview on [DATE] at 1:57 p.m., LVN L stated she worked on weekends. LVN L stated she had received training for a mock CPR code event with specific training to include the immediate use of an AED as soon as the AED is presented. LVN L stated she received further training to include documentation to reflect the details and times of events for the CPR AED event. During an interview on [DATE] at 1:58 p.m., RN O stated she was one of the ADONs. RN O stated she had received training on [DATE], to include instructions, for a mock CPR code event with specific training to include the immediate use of an AED as soon as the AED is presented. RN O stated she received further training to include documentation to reflect the details and times of events for the CPR AED event. During an interview on [DATE] at 2:01 p.m., LVN J stated she worked 10-6 shift. LVN J stated the training included the immediate use of an AED as soon as the AED was presented on the crash cart. LVN J stated the training also focused on post documentation for the CPR event to include event time, description details, such as time CPR started, time AED used. During an interview on [DATE] at 2:12 p.m., RN D stated she worked 10-6 shift. RN D stated she had received training for a mock CPR code event with specific training to include the immediate use of an AED as soon as the AED is presented. RN D stated she received further training to include documentation to reflect the details and times of events for the CPR AED event. During an interview on [DATE] at 2:17 p.m., RN N stated she worked 6-2 shifts. RN N stated she had received training for a mock CPR code event with specific training to include the immediate use of an AED as soon as the AED is presented. RN N stated she received further training to include documentation to reflect the details and times of events for the CPR AED event. During an interview on [DATE] at 2:21 p.m., LVN H stated she was the MDS Coordinator. LVN H stated she worked weekends. LVN U stated the training included the immediate use of an AED as soon as the AED was presented on the crash cart. LVN H stated the training also focused on post documentation for the CPR event to include event time, description details, such as time CPR started, time AED used. During an interview on [DATE] at 2:33 p.m., LVN A stated she had received training for a mock CPR code event with specific training to include the immediate use of an AED as soon as the AED is presented. LVN A stated she received further training to include documentation to reflect the details and times of events for the CPR AED event. During an interview on [DATE] at 2:47 p.m., LVN M stated she worked 10-6 shift. LVN M stated she had received training on [DATE], to include instructions, for a mock CPR code event with specific training to include the immediate use of an AED as soon as the AED is presented. LVN M stated she received further training to include documentation to reflect the details and times of events for the CPR AED event. During an interview on [DATE] at 2:50 p.m., LVN U stated she worked weekends. LVN U stated the training included the immediate use of an AED as soon as the AED was presented on the crash cart. LVN U stated the training also focused on post documentation for the CPR event to include event time, description details, such as time CPR started, time AED used. The facility DON/designee completed a 100% audit of residents advanced directive. The audit was completed on [DATE]. Residents who did not have a proper advanced directive were corrected immediately. A record review of the facility census revealed 29 residents requested they receive CPR (CardioPulmonary Resuscitation) care and had full code orders signed by a physician. A record review of Resident #2's code status revealed Resident #2 was a full code. A record review of Resident #7's code status revealed Resident #7 was a full code. A record review of Resident #33's code status revealed Resident #33 was a full code. A record review of Resident #53's code status revealed Resident #53 was a full code. A record review of Resident #257's code status revealed Resident #257 was a full code. ADMN AA, DON, and designee will develop and ensure an ongoing long-term monitoring and oversight system is in place by [DATE] to review and address concerns related to the deficient practices identified in F678. Monitoring will include a system to ensure deficient practice is prevented. The monitoring and oversight system will ensure clinical staff are adequately trained to meet requirements of safe practice. Concerns identified will be provided by the DON or designee to the QAPI committee monthly, for a minimum of 6 months, for the discussion of sustaining compliance or correction of concerns identified. The DON or designee will develop a short-term monitoring system for all areas of deficient practice identified for this deficiency. Monitoring will include a system to observe all clinical staff's adequate understanding of rapid response protocols on all shifts. Monitoring will be completed through direct observation, when possible, as well as through observation of mock codes. The monitoring will be documented on educational in-service forms and mock drills with staff's acknowledgment. The Director of Nursing/ designee will also conduct a chart review of any resident who has coded to validate that charting has been completed adequately and according to the education provided. This monitoring system will begin [DATE]. Data gathered will be measurable and monitoring will occur at least monthly and include weekend days and alternate shifts over the next 3 months and quarterly following. All concerns identified during the monitoring process will be addressed timely and documented for correction. The monitoring process, findings, and corrections will be presented to the facility QAPI committee each month for a minimum of 6 months for this plan of correction. Administrator will be responsible for monitoring DON compliance with system monthly. System compliance will be documented and discussed. A record review of the facility's undated, F678 Quality of Care Life Support monitoring worksheet revealed, Administrator will conduct monitoring to ensure rapid response Mock drills are conducted once a month for 3 months and once a quarter for six months; a form designed to document and follow CPR Mock Codes to include corrective actions. A record review of the facility's [TRUNCATED]
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Deficiency F0726 (Tag F0726)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure that licensed nurses have the specific compete...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure that licensed nurses have the specific competencies and skill sets necessary to care for residents' needs, as identified through resident assessments, and described in the plan of care for 3 of 29 (Resident #61) residents reviewed for CPR care and 2 of 21 nurses (LVN A and RN C) reviewed for competencies and skill sets for CPR care to include an AED, in that; The facility failed to ensure all nursing staff had competent skills in performing actual CPR, to include using the AED, as a result of Resident #61 being found unresponsive on [DATE] and the responding nurse staff (LVN A and RN C) not using the AED during the actual CPR process for this resident. An IJ was identified on [DATE]. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 4:10 pm. While the IJ was removed on [DATE], the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a severity level of actual harm that was not Immediate Jeopardy because the facility is still monitoring the effectiveness of their Plan of Removal. This failure placed residents at risk for harm up to and including death by the denial of all life saving measures as trained. The findings included: A record review of Resident #1's admission record dated, [DATE], revealed an admission date of [DATE] and a death discharge date of [DATE], with diagnoses which included altered mental status, extended spectrum beta lactamase resistance [a bacteria that can't be killed by many of the antibiotics that doctors use to treat infections, like penicillin's and some cephalosporins for urinary tract infections], and urinary tract infection. A record review of Resident #1's admission MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #61 was an [AGE] year-old male admitted from an acute care hospital for support and rehabilitation related to a urinary tract infection. A record review of Resident #61's physician's order dated [DATE] revealed RN R documented a physician's order for Resident #61 to receive care as Full Code. A record review of Resident #61's care plan dated [DATE], revealed, [Resident #61] has an advance Directive as evidenced by: Full code status Date Initiated: [DATE] [ .] wishes will be honored, Date Initiated: [DATE] [ .] CPR will be performed as ordered A record review of Resident #61's SBAR document dated [DATE] revealed, Situation [ .] the change in condition, symptoms, or signs observed, and evaluated is/are: cardiac arrest, respiratory arrest. This started on: [DATE]. Since this started it has gotten: stayed the same [ .] Resident/Patient Evaluation [ .] mental status evaluation: unresponsiveness [ .] Code Status: Full Code [ .] Appearance, summarize your observations and evaluation: CNA notified this nurse of resident being unresponsive assessed resident not responsive no pulse RN supervisor notified initiated CPR crash cart access notified 911 CPR performed until paramedics arrived emergency medical technicians continued with CPR resident transfers out with Pulse unconscious accompanied by three emergency medical technicians [ .]. A record review of the EMS TripTix EMS Patient Care Record dated [DATE] revealed, CPR was performed by the facility staff for 9 minutes from 09:38 AM to 09:47 AM as evidenced by, Incident Date / Times [ .] unit notified by dispatch [DATE] 09:41 [AM] [ .] Unit En Route [DATE] 09:43 [AM] [ .] Unit Arrived on Scene [DATE] 09:45 [AM] [ .] Arrived at patient [DATE] 09:47 [AM] [ .] Unit left scene [DATE] 10:04 [AM] [ .] complaints and impressions; cardiac arrest, onset date and time [DATE] 09:38 [AM], [ .] AED used prior to EMS NO [ .] Further review revealed a summary which reflected the facility had performed CPR chest compressions and oxygenated rescue breathing but had not used the AED. The EMTs provided medications and applied the EMS AED and revealed Resident #61 had regained an irregular heartbeat after EMS care and medications administered intraosseous [directly into the bone marrow]. During an interview and observation on [DATE] at 02:28 PM the DON stated sometime in [DATE] Resident #61 was discovered unresponsive and was provided emergency CPR care. The DON stated she was not certain if the AED used. The DON proceeded to demonstrate the AED to the surveyor. The AED was stored on the facility's emergency crash cart along with CPR equipment such as an oxygen tank, and oxygen delivery equipment and included a suction pump with accessories. The DON demonstrated the AED as functional and stated the AED had not been used and could not recall the last time it had been used. The DON stated she believed LVN A, LVN B, and RN C were directly involved with Resident #1's CPR care. During an interview on [DATE] at 07:10 PM the DON provided updated information and stated she recalled the [DATE] CPR event for Resident #61 and stated the AED was not utilized, and EMS services arrived at the facility after the 911 call, approximately 4-5 minutes. The DON stated she did not know why the AED was not utilized and further stated EMS arrived quickly. The DON was asked to provide any further documentation to the event and did not provide further documentation. The DON stated LVN A, LVN B, and RN C were involved in the CPR event for Resident #61 AND reported to her Resident #61 was unresponsive. LVN A stated she told the CNAs to get RN C and immediately arrived at Resident #61's bed side. LVN A stated she assessed Resident #61 as a full code and without a pulse and not breathing. LVN A stated she began emergency CPR with chest compressions and RN C arrived at the bedside quickly. LVN A stated RN C assumed chest compressions and told her to get the crash cart and call 911. LVN A stated she ran to retrieve the crash cart and along the way told LVN B to call 911. LVN A stated she returned to Resident #61 with the crash cart and resumed chest compressions while RN C administered oxygen with rescue breaths. LVN A stated 911 EMTs were at the bedside quickly around 4-7 minutes maybe. LVN A stated EMS took over and Resident #61 was assessed with a pulse and left for the hospital with EMS. LVN A stated she was trained for CPR by the American Heart Association. LVN A stated the AED was stored on the crash cart and was immediately available upon arrival at Resident #61's bedside. LVN A stated the AED was never opened, removed from the case, or from the crash cart. LVN A stated she was so involved in providing CPR chest compressions and rescue breaths she did not think about the AED. LVN A stated her training included the use of an AED during CPR as soon as the AED was available. During an interview on [DATE] at 06:00 AM RN C stated on [DATE] she worked from 06:00 AM to 02:00 PM. RN C stated she was providing patient care when CNAs AB and AC told her LVN A needed her, and Resident #61 was unresponsive. RN C stated she ran to Resident #61's bedside and assessed Resident #61 as unresponsive and told LVN A to get the crash cart and call 911. RN C stated she began CPR chest compressions. RN C stated LVN A returned with the crash-cart, and they switched CPR roles and LVN A continued chest compressions while RN C administered oxygenated rescue breaths. RN C stated 911 EMS arrived quickly and continued CPR. RN C stated the facility's AED was stored on the facility's crash-cart and was immediately available when the crash-cart arrived but she nor LVN A gave it a thought due to the high stress of providing CPR. RN C stated she and LVN A provided CPR for maybe 5 minutes and 911 arrived quickly. RN C stated she was CPR trained by the American Heart Association. RN C stated her training included the use of an AED during CPR as soon as the AED is available. RN C stated she had not documented her role in Resident #61's CPR care to include times and details of care such as the use of an AED, RN C stated she believed the DON and / or LVN A had documented the CPR care. A record review of the facility's Emergency Procedure Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation policy dated February 2018, revealed, Policy Statement; personnel have completed training on the initiation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation and basic life support including Defibrillation for victims of sudden cardiac arrest; general guidelines; the chances of surviving sudden cardiac arrest may be increased if CPR is initiated immediately upon collapse. Early delivery of a shock with a defibrillator plus CPR within 3 to 5 minutes of collapse can further increase chances of survival [ .] emergency procedure; cardiopulmonary resuscitation; [ .] when the AED arrives assess for need and follow AED protocol as indicated [ .]. A record review of the American Heart Association's website Part 3: Adult Basic and Advanced Life Support; 2020 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care https://cpr.heart.org/en/resuscitation-science/cpr-and-ecc-guidelines/adult-basic-and-advanced-life-support, accessed [DATE], revealed, Top 10 take home messages for adult cardiovascular life support: [ .] On recognition of a cardiac arrest event, a layperson should simultaneously and promptly activate the emergency response system and initiate cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Performance of high-quality CPR includes adequate compression depth and rate while minimizing pauses in compressions. Early defibrillation with concurrent high-quality CPR is critical to survival when sudden cardiac arrest [ .] Defibrillation is most successful when administered as soon as possible [ .]. A record review of the facility's in-service train the trainer, revealed, In-service Description: Rapid Response Policy, date: [DATE], Instructor Corp RN, in-service time: 1 hour.; the Administrator; the DON received CPR / AED training. Further review of the attached printed training revealed, [ .] the chances of surviving a sudden cardiac arrest maybe increased if CPR is initiated immediately upon collapse [ .] Early delivery of a shock with a defibrillator plus CPR within 3-5 minutes of collapse can further increase chances of survival [ .] Provide periodic mock codes for training purposes [ .] instruct a staff member to retrieve the automatic external defibrillators [ .] when the AED arrives, assess for need and followed protocols as indicated [ .] continue with CPR/BLS until emergency medical personnel arrive [ .] This was determined to be an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 08/072023 at 4:10 p.m. The Administrator was notified. The Administrator was provided with the IJ template on [DATE]. The following Plan of Removal was accepted on [DATE] at 2:10 p.m. Plan of Removal Verification Date [DATE] PLAN OF REMOVAL FOR IMMEDIATE JEOPARDY To Whom it May Concern, POR - Plan of Removal for Immediate Jeopardy dated [DATE] at 12:32 PM with the DON and ADMN Y: Summary of details which leads to outcomes. On [DATE] an annual survey was initiated at the Facility. On [DATE], a surveyor provided an IJ Template notification that the Survey Agency has determined that the conditions at the center constitute immediate jeopardy to resident health. The notification of the alleged immediate jeopardy states as follows: F726 COMPETENT NURSING STAFF The facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff with the appropriate competencies and skills set to provide nursing and related services to assure resident and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident Problem The Facility's Deficient practice revealed facility staff failed to demonstrate competency related to providing basic life support, including CPR including the timely application and use of an AED to a resident requiring emergency care prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel. Immediate Corrections Implemented for Removal of Immediate Jeopardy. o Once the facility was made aware of the deficient practice, the Director of Nursing/ designee conducted an in-service with all staff on Mock Code, Rapid Response, AED, and CPR Training with emphasis on staff competencies to include all licensed staff all shifts, with return demonstration. The facility Director of Nursing/designee completed a 100% training in person with return demonstration of all licensed staff began on [DATE] and completed on [DATE] o Director of Nursing/Designee initiated education with clinical staff on [DATE] on proper protocol and procedure during a rapid response event and including timely retrieval and proper use of AED. This education was completed on [DATE]. The education was completed as a mock drill and monitored with DONs direct supervision and guidance to validate staff competency and understanding completed began mock code Competency in-service training sheet. Identification of Others: o Residents identified with full code status have the potential to be impacted by the alleged deficient practice. o Director of nursing/designee completed mock code reviews with clinical staff to ensure adequate knowledge of resuscitation protocol. Systemic Changes o the DON/designee initiated immediate training on Mock Codes, Rapid Response, AED, CPR and documentation of code process training to nursing staff on [DATE]. All education is at 100% completion as of [DATE]. o the DON/designee completed all education and training to all clinical staff and all clinical staff upon hire and added to new hire checklist. o the facility DON, Corporate Clinical Director and Administrator met on [DATE] to evaluate the facility policy and procedures regarding Quality of Life and staff competencies. o the DON/designee will complete education and training with all clinical staff on [DATE] and newly hired clinical staff over Mock Codes, Rapid Response, AED, CPR protocols and documentation of code process. The education will be provided by DON or designee with the necessary skill set related to CPR/ Rapid Response, including AED use and proper documentation. Education will include return demonstration and routine mocks to validate understanding and competency of all clinical staff. o The Administrator, DON/designee will develop and ensure an ongoing long-term monitoring and oversight system is in place by [DATE] to review and address concerns related to the deficient practices identified in F726. Monitoring will include a system to ensure deficient practice is prevented. The monitoring and oversight system will ensure clinical staff are adequately trained to meet requirements of safe practice. Concerns identified will be provided by the DON or designee to the QAPI committee monthly, for a minimum of 6 months, for the discussion of sustaining compliance or correction of concerns identified. Monitoring o The DON or designee will develop a short-term monitoring system for all areas of deficient practice identified for this deficiency by [DATE]. Monitoring will include a system to observe all clinical staff's verbalization of comprehension and return demonstration of rapid response protocols on all shifts through return demonstration q month for 3 months and quarterly for 12 months. o Monitoring will be completed through direct observation, when possible, and observation of mock codes. DON/Designee will retain record of all written mock competencies' routine and PRN. Mock codes will be run monthly for all clinical staff q month for 3 months on various shifts, then quarterly for 12 months. The monitoring will be documented on educational in-service forms and mock drills with staff's acknowledgment. o The Administrator/ designee will develop or ensure an ongoing long-term monitoring and oversight system is in place by [DATE] to review and address concerns related to the deficient practices identified in F726 o The QAPI committee will meet monthly, and facility interdisciplinary team will meet daily to review the ongoing status of the corrections for this deficiency with the purpose to identify, evaluate, plan, implement, and address concerns or deficient practices identified as it relates, or to determine if compliance is being sustained. All corrections or steps taken and identified by QAPI will be documented and addressed immediately. o An Ad Hoc QAPI meeting was held on [DATE] with the Medical Director, Administrator, Director of Nursing, and IDT to review and validate the plan of removal. Involvement of Medical Director The DON notified the facility's Medical Director, of the Immediate Jeopardy tag on [DATE]. The Administrator will be responsible for implementation of ensuring the adequate process regarding Monitoring of staff competency related to the provision of CPR including the use of an AED. The new process/system was initiated on [DATE]. Please accept this letter as our plan of removal for determination of the alleged Immediate Jeopardy issued [DATE]. Plan of Removal Verification Once the facility was made aware of the deficient practice, the DON/designee conducted an in-service with all staff on Mock Code, Rapid Response, AED, and CPR Training with emphasis on staff competencies to include all licensed staff all shifts, with return demonstration. The facility Director of Nursing/designee completed a 100% training in person with return demonstration of all licensed staff began on [DATE] and completed on [DATE] DON/Designee initiated education with clinical staff on [DATE] on proper protocol and procedure during a rapid response event and including timely retrieval and proper use of AED. This education was completed on [DATE]. The education was completed as a mock drill and monitored with DON's direct supervision and guidance to validate staff competency and understanding completed began mock code Competency in-service training sheet. Identification of Others: Residents identified with full code status have the potential to be impacted by the alleged deficient practice. Director of nursing/designee completed mock code reviews with clinical staff to ensure adequate knowledge of resuscitation protocol. Systemic Changes The DON/designee initiated immediate training on Mock Codes, Rapid Response, AED, CPR, and documentation of code process training to nursing staff on [DATE]. All education is at 100% completion as of [DATE]. The DON/designee completed all education and training to all clinical staff and all clinical staff upon hire and added to new hire checklist. The facility DON, Corporate Clinical Director and Administrator met on [DATE] to evaluate the facility policy and procedures regarding Quality of Life and staff competencies. The DON/designee will complete education and training with all clinical staff on [DATE] and newly hired clinical staff over Mock Codes, Rapid Response, AED, CPR protocols and documentation of code process. The education will be provided by DON or designee with the necessary skill set related to CPR/ Rapid Response, including AED use and proper documentation. Education will include return demonstration and routine mocks to validate understanding and competency of all clinical staff. During and observation of a mock CPR AED event on [DATE] at 01:51 p.m., revealed the DON called out to that a resident was unresponsive. The DON yelled out Code Blue and instructed RN O, RN K, RN N and LVN P to follow her to the unresponsive mock-Resident's room. The DON then delegated responsibilities to each nurse and one nurse to go get the crash cart. DON then proceeded to place a backboard under mock resident while communicating out load the importance of this backboard and if no backboard to then place the Unresponsive resident on the floor. The DON began compressions while counting outloud to 30, followed by using the AMBU bag for the two breaths. The crash cart arrived during this time. The DON showed staff, while doing it, how to remove the AED from its case, open the AED cover, which automatically begins the verbal AED Prompts protocols, the DON removed the AED pads from the case, attached the electrical pad leads to the AED, and placed the pads on the CPR mannequin, and continued to follow the AED verbal Prompts. The DON stated to the Mock CPR AED participants, continue CPR with the AED until EMS arrives. Interview on [DATE] at 2PM the DON stated 2 nurses, LVN M and LVN J were called at first and came in for mock CPR code training. Interview on [DATE] at 2:13 PM with LVN P, T, TH doubles, Fridays 6-2PM, worked for SNF for 8 yrs. Worked all halls. DON -over weekend had a mock code, in-service, documentations, designate duties, implement AED, can participate call 911, call family, Call MD, give report to ER implement skills and continue use of AED. Interview on [DATE] at 2:18 PM- ADON K, worked for [DATE], works the floor if coverage is needed, all shifts -Did mock codes- 6 time, staff that would work different shifts, she made sure to cover all component, directed staff to do different task, call 911, call family, call MD, give report to ER, especially documentation, QAPI- monthly-don't recall talking about Resident #61, had 2 ADHOC mtg- nursing competency, areas of improvement all related to investigations management team DM, pharmacies, DON, Admin. Interview on [DATE] at 2:23 PM with RN O, ADON, m-f 8-5, prn, worked the floor, worked all halls, worked as LVN, trained on Mock code by DON-process and delegate task, call 911, family, MD and DON. Learned the delegating of task. QAPI-not sure if it was brought up, recent member to QAPI, had a emergency QAPI mtg, called MD, pharmacist, Admin, DON, department heads-discussed the incident with resident and interventions and POR. Interview on [DATE] at 2:33 PM with RN N, worked for 7 yrs. ago, worked all halls, worked days and evenings, DON mock codes-2nd, refreshes CPR training, CPR certified, process- go to resident, assess, pulse, delegate, check if resident code status, work as a team to assist resident. Make sure to sue board or on floor, make sure resident is positioned and can with out with other team member, utilize ED, document, wait for EMS. Did go to QAPI trainings. Interview on [DATE] at 2:46 PM with LVN J, worked the prn, all shifts, all halls, (nights) worked for 2 yrs., was out of town, called her on phone, yesterday did demonstration - DON in-service, CPR, all staff have a role, check pt., make sure environment after, assess, check code status, process, CNA can be involved- calling 911, family, DON explained for nursed and CNA in detail of training, CPR, AED, QAPI-not sure. Interview on [DATE] at 2:51 PM with LVN M, night shift, worked here for 1 yr., DON-called first, then came in yesterday for mock code-going over code and procedures and react to situation, go to room, res not breathing, initiated emergency response, call 911, cart c rt, AED, document time, delegate task, document on PCC. QAPI-had training. Interview on [DATE] at 2:57 PM with LVN F, Med nurse Charge nurse, m-f 6-2, worked for 2 yrs., worked all halls, in-service - was at SNF, mock code and in-service-find resident responsive, if code does not get verbal, check pulse, assess, delegate task, check res code status, crash cart, back board, AED, start on CPR and wait for EMS to come, QAPI-not sure. Interview on [DATE] at 3:16 PM with LVN E, shifts doubles 6-10pm, worked for 3 months, worked E, F B hall (left side), -DON in-service mock code-demonstrated mock code, trained, res assesses, get res code status, 30 compressions to 2 rest, AED, call 911, etc, documentation and who helped you and wait for EMS. QAPI- no A record review of the facility's nursing roster revealed 21 nurses were employed by the facility over all 3 shifts, 06:00 AM to 02:00 PM, 02:00 PM to 10:00 PM, and 10:00 PM to 06:00 AM. 21 of the 21 nurses were interviewed for AED CPR training. A record review of the facility's nursing roster revealed 2 nurses, LVN J and LVN M were not in serviced in person as of [DATE] and have since [DATE] received in person CPR, AED, Documentation, training. During an interview on [DATE] at 02:13 PM LVN P stated she had received in person training for a mock CPR code event with specific training to include the immediate use of an AED as soon as the AED is presented. LVN P stated she received further training to include documentation to reflect the details and times of events for the CPR AED event. LVN P stated the training was documented on a training competency checkoff form which she signed, and the DON signed. LVN P stated she currently works 3-4 time a week doubles from 06:00 AM to 02:00 PM and continues on 02:00 PM to 10:00 PM. During an interview on [DATE] at 02:18 PM RN K stated she had received training on [DATE] to include instructions for a mock CPR code event with specific training to include the immediate use of an AED as soon as the AED is presented. RN K stated she received further training to include documentation to reflect the details and times of events for the CPR AED event. RN K stated her training with return demonstration was recorded on a CRP AED competency checkoff form signed by the DON and herself. RN K stated she had attended the QAPI meeting on [DATE]. RN K stated she works Monday thru Friday 06:00 AM to 06:00 PM. During an interview on [DATE] at 02:23 PM RN O stated she had received in-person training for CPR with the use of an AED during a Mock CPR code event on [DATE]. RN O stated the training included the immediate use of an AED as soon as the AED was presented on the crash cart. RN O stated the training also focused on post documentation for the CPR event to include event time, description details, such as time CPR started, time AED used. RN O stated the DON signed her CPR AED competency checkoff list in approval of her CPR AED competency training. RN O stated she works Monday thru Friday 06:00 AM to 06:00 PM. During an interview on [DATE] at 02:33 PM RN N stated she had received in person training for a mock CPR code event with specific training to include the immediate use of an AED as soon as the AED is presented. RN N stated she received further training to include documentation to reflect the details and times of events for the CPR AED event. RN N stated the training was documented on a training competency checkoff form which she signed, and the DON signed. RN N stated she received in-service training for QAPI reporting. RN N stated she currently works 3-4 time a week doubles from 06:00 AM to 02:00 PM and continues on 02:00 PM to 10:00 PM. During an interview on [DATE] at 02:50 PM LVN J stated she had received training on [DATE] to include instructions for a mock CPR code event with specific training to include the immediate use of an AED as soon as the AED is presented. LVN J stated she received further training to include documentation to reflect the details and times of events for the CPR AED event. LVN J stated her training with return demonstration was recorded on a CRP AED competency checkoff form signed by the DON and herself. LVN J stated she was in serviced on the QAPI review process. LVN J stated she is PRN and works all shifts. During an interview on [DATE] at 02:51 PM LVN M stated she had received in-person training for CPR with the use of an AED during a Mock CPR code event on [DATE]. LVN M stated the training included the immediate use of an AED as soon as the AED was presented on the crash cart. LVN M stated the training also focused on post documentation for the CPR event to include event time, description details, such as time CPR started, time AED used. LVN M stated the DON signed her CPR AED competency checkoff list in approval of her CPR AED competency training. LVN M stated she works the night shift 10:00 PM to 06:00 AM. During an interview on [DATE] at 02:57 PM LVN F stated she had received in person training for a mock CPR code event with specific training to include the immediate use of an AED as soon as the AED is presented. LVN F stated she received further training to include documentation to reflect the details and times of events for the CPR AED event. LVN F stated the training was documented on a training competency checkoff form which she signed, and the DON signed. LVN F stated she received in-service training for QAPI reporting. LVN F stated she worked the 06:00 AM to 02:00 PM shift. During an interview on [DATE] at 03:16 PM LVN E stated she had received training on [DATE] to include instructions for a mock CPR code event with specific training to include the immediate use of an AED as soon as the AED is presented. LVN E stated she received further training to include documentation to reflect the details and times of events for the CPR AED event. LVN E stated her training with return demonstration was recorded on a CPR AED competency checkoff form signed by the DON and herself. LVN E stated she had attended the QAPI meeting on [DATE]. LVN E stated she works Monday thru Friday 06:00 AM to 06:00 PM. LVN E stated she currently works 3-4 time a week doubles from 06:00 AM to 02:00 PM and continued 02:00 PM to 10:00 PM. Identification of Others: Residents identified with full code status have the potential to be impacted by the alleged deficient practice. A record review of the facility census revealed 29 residents requested they receive CPR care and had Full Code orders signed by a physician. A record review of Resident #2's code status revealed Resident #2 was a full code. A record review of Resident #7's code status revealed Resident #7 was a full code. A record review of Resident #33's code status revealed Resident #33 was a full code. A record review of Resident #53's code status revealed Resident #53 was a full code. A record review of Resident #257's code status revealed Resident #257 was a full code. Monitoring The DON or designee will develop a short-term monitoring system for all areas of deficient practice identified for this deficiency by [DATE]. Monitoring will include a system to observe all clinical staff's verbalization of comprehension and return demonstration of rapid response protocols on all shifts through return demonstration q month for 3 months and quarterly for 12 months. Monitoring will be completed through direct observation, when possible, and observation of mock codes. DON/Designee will retain record of all written mock competencies' routine and PRN. Mock codes will be run monthly for all clinical staff q month for 3 months on various shifts, then quarterly for 12 months. The monitoring will be documented on educational in-service forms and mock drills with staff's acknowledgment. The Administrator/ designee will develop or ensure an ongoing long-term monitoring and oversight system is in place by [DATE] to review and address concerns related to the deficient practices identified in F726 A record review of the facility's, F726 Staffing, Sufficient and Competent Nursing policy, dated [DATE] revealed, Policy Statement: Our Facility provides sufficient numbers of nursing staff with the appropriate skills and competency necessary to provide nursing and related care and services for all residents in accordance with resident care plans and the facility assessment. policy interpretation and implementation: . competent staff: competency is a measurable pattern of knowledge, skills, abilities, behaviors, and other characteristics that an individual needs to perform work roles or occupational functions successfully. All nursing staff must meet the specific competency requirements of their respective licensure and certification requirements defined by state law. staff must demonstrate the skills and techniques necessary to care for residents needs
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0558 (Tag F0558)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the right to reside and receive services in the ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences except when to do so would endanger the health or safety of the resident or other residents for 1 of 8 (Resident #13) residents reviewed in that: Resident #13's call light was not within reach while he was in bed. This could affect residents who used their call light or desired to use the call light and place them at risk of not being able to notify staff of their needs. The findings were: Record review of Resident # 13's admission record dated 8/5/2023 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE], age [AGE] years old, with diagnoses of hemiplegia and hemiparesis (means you can't move or control the muscles in the affected body part.) following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominate side, lack of coordination, seizures, muscle weakness, pain in joint, and chronic pain syndrome. Record review of Resident # 13's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE], revealed Section C Cognitive Patterns- BIMS score was 10/15 (moderately impaired). Section G Functional Status reflected for bed mobility, transfer, dressing, toilet use he was extensive assistance with 2-person assistance, and he required total dependence for bathing. Section G0400 Functional Limitations in Range of Motion reflected he had impairment on one side for upper/lower extremities. Observation on 8/04/2023 at 11:03 AM in Resident #13's room revealed he was laying in bed; his call light was not within reach and was hanging down on the left side of his bed. Observation of Resident #13 revealed he was not able to move his left arm and his right hand was limited in movement. Interview on 8/4/2023 at 11:04 AM with Resident #13 stated he was not able to reach his call light because he could not move his left arm and was limited in movement on his right arm. Interview on 8/4/2023 at 11:30 with the ADON revealed the call light for Resident #13 was not within reach and will place in an area where he could reach. The ADON stated she was not sure why the call light was not within Resident #13's reach. The ADON stated Resident #13's left arm is limited in movement. Interview on at 8/04/2023 at 12:56 PM with the ADM AA stated the risk for a resident's call light not being within reach would be the resident would not be able to notify staff if they needed care. Record review of the policy Answering call lights, dated July 2023 revealed Purpose: The purpose of this procedure is to ensure timely responses to the residents' request and needs. General Guidelines: 5. Ensure that the call light is accessible to the resident when in bed.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0578 (Tag F0578)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents' right to formulate an advance directive for 1 o...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents' right to formulate an advance directive for 1 of 11 residents (Resident #24) reviewed for advanced directives, in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident 24's Out-of-Hospital Do Not Resuscitate (OOH-DNR) was executed correctly. This failure could place residents at-risk for residents' rights not being honored. The findings were: Record review of Resident #24's face sheet, dated [DATE], revealed the resident was re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Alzheimer's disease, dementia, and protein-calorie malnutrition. Record review of Resident #24's quarterly MDS assessment, dated [DATE], revealed the resident was not able to complete Cognitive interview and therefore a staff assessment was completed, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Record review of Resident #24's physicians orders, dated [DATE], revealed an order entered on [DATE] that read: ADC: Do Not Resuscitate - DNR. Record review of Resident #24's care plan, last reviewed [DATE], revealed [Resident #24]/legal guardian chooses to have death with dignity, advanced directive established. Individual wishes include: No CPR, DNR Code Status . Record review of Resident #24's OOH-DNR, signed [DATE], revealed [name of] Notary signed under the section Notary in the State of Texas with a valid notary stamp. Further record review revealed [name of] notary was not signed under Notary's Signature located in the bottom section titled All persons who have signed above must sign below, acknowledging that this document has been properly completed. During an interview and record review on [DATE] at 6:26 p.m., the SW stated the form was not signed by the notary in the bottom section. The SW was not able to recall why it was not signed at the bottom. The SW stated she ensured the DNR was signed completely and then nurse administration was whom entered the DNR order in the resident's EHR. The SW stated the potential harm to Resident #24 was staff would do CPR instead of following the resident's wishes. During an interview on [DATE] at 6:45 p.m., ADMN AA stated Resident #24's DNR was not valid if it was not signed at the bottom. He stated the SW was ultimately responsible for the DNR forms but that it was an IDT effort in the end. ADMN AA stated the potential harm was the facility not following Resident #24's wishes. During an interview on [DATE] at 7:01 p.m., the DON stated the SW was responsible for DNR's being completed correctly. She stated all resident's code status were reviewed during the quarterly care plan meetings. The DON believed there was no potential harm to this resident because the DNR order was in Resident #24's EHR. Record review of facility policy titled Do Not Resuscitate Order, revised 03/2021, revealed nothing about the actual signed DNR form.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Respiratory Care (Tag F0695)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who needed respiratory care were pro...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who needed respiratory care were provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 2 residents (Residents #54) reviewed for respiratory care, in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #54's oxygen order included liter parameters This deficient practice could place residents who received oxygen therapy at risk for incorrect oxygen support being delivered and an increase in respiratory complications. The findings were: Record review of Resident #54's face sheet, dated 08/04/2023, revealed the resident was re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: anxiety disorder, major depression, legal blindness, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Record review of Resident #54's annual MDS assessment, dated 04/15/2023, revealed the resident had a BIMS score of 15, which indicated intact cognitive impairment. Record review of Resident #54's physicians orders, dated 08/03/2023, revealed an order entered on 07/05/2023 that read: Oxygen via NC qhs per resident request dx: COPD, may titrate to maintain o2 sats >88%. During an interview on 08/02/2023 at 6:17 p.m., Resident #54 stated he only used the oxygen while he was sleeping. He further stated he was on 2 liters. During an interview and observation on 08/03/2023 at 6:15 p.m., Resident #54 was not in his room, however, his roommate stated yes, he uses the oxygen only at night and that he usually get up around 3:00 am and goes to bed around 8:00 pm. During an observation and interview on 08/04/2023 at 12:34 a.m., LVN U observed Resident #54 was currently using oxygen and that he was supposed to be on two liters. During an interview and record review on 08/04/2023 at 12:37 at a.m., LVN M stated yes Resident #54 used oxygen at night and was supposed to be two liters. LVN M stated, during record review, she was not aware of why his order did not have liters on it. LVN M further stated she was not aware of a potential harm to resident. During an interview on 08/04/23 at 12:07 p.m., the DON stated she spoke with Resident #54's Dr and he agreed that resident's order should have (liter) parameters included. The DON stated that his liters changed so much so the IDT team decided to just state titrate and not specify any liters. The DON stated this allowed the resident to manage his O2 depending on how he was feeling at the time he was using the O2. The DON further stated she was not aware of a potential harm to the resident because his order still stated titrate. Record review of the facility's policy titled Medication Orders, revised 11/2014, which read 3. Oxygen Orders - When recording orders for oxygen, specify the rate of flow, route and rationale.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0760 (Tag F0760)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents are free of any significant medic...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents are free of any significant medication errors, for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #267) reviewed for medication administration, in that: MA W crushed and administered metoprolol extended release [a medication which lowers blood pressure and should not be crushed] to Resident #267. This deficient practice placed residents at risk for not receiving therapeutic effects of their medications and possible adverse reactions. The findings included: A record review of Resident #267's admission record dated 08/05/2023 revealed an admission date 07/21/2023 with diagnoses which included essential (primary) hypertension [high blood pressure]. A record review of Resident #267's admission MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #267 was an [AGE] year-old female admitted for long term care. A record review of Resident #267's care plan dated 08/03/2023, revealed, Resident #267 has impaired cardiovascular status related to: Hypertension . Resident will not have a decline in function related to cardiac condition through next 90 days .Medications as ordered by physician and Observe use and effectiveness. A record review of Resident #267's physicians orders dated 08/03/2023 revealed Resident #267 was prescribed metoprolol [a medication used to lower blood pressure] extended-release form [a pill designed with a coating to slowly dissolve and deliver a low steady dose throughout the day], metoprolol succinate ER Oral Tablet Extended Release 24 Hour 25 MG (Metoprolol Succinate) Give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day . During an observation on 08/03/2023 at 03:30 PM Medication Aide W [MA W] prepared, crushed, and administered metoprolol 25mg extended release 24 hr. to Resident #267. During an interview and record review on 08/04/2023 at 08:34 AM LVN F identified the medication aide cart for Resident #267. LVN F opened the medication cart and demonstrated Resident #267's metoprolol medication card. The card revealed the label which read, metoprolol succinate ER Oral Tablet Extended Release 24 Hour 25 MG (Metoprolol Succinate) Give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day . The surveyor asked LVN F if this medication could be crushed and LVN F stated, it should not be crushed. During an interview on 08/04/2023 at 08:40 PM the DON received a report from the surveyor that the results of the medication observations revealed MA W crushed and administered to Resident #267 metoprolol extended-release medication. The DON stated the extended-release formulation of medications should not be crushed. A record review of the facility's Adverse Consequences and Medication Errors dated February 2023, revealed, Policy Heading: The interdisciplinary team monitors medication usage in order to prevent and detect medication-related problems such as adverse drug reactions and side effects. Policy Interpretation and Implementation .Medications Errors 1. A medication error is defined as the preparation or administration of drugs or biologicals which is not in accordance with physician's orders, manufacturer specifications, or accepted professional standards and principles of the professional(s) providing services. A record review of the US National Library of Medicine website https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/drugInfo.cfm?setid=a0c8c0ac-863c-4385-94d2-f6691bee66d9 accessed 08/04/2023, revealed, Dosage and Administration: Metoprolol succinate is an extended release tablet intended for once daily administration. For treatment of hypertension and angina .metoprolol succinate extended-release tablets are scored and can be divided; however, do not crush or chew the whole or half tablet.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Medical Records (Tag F0842)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident that are complete; accu...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident that are complete; accurately documented; readily accessible; and systematically organized, for 1 of 1 Resident(s) (Resident #61) reviewed for accurate medical records, in that: LVN A and RN C failed to document the details of CPR care provided for Resident #61. This failure could place residents at risk for harm by inaccurate records. The findings included: A record review of Resident #1's admission record dated, [DATE], revealed an admission date of [DATE] and a death discharge date of [DATE], with diagnoses which included altered mental status, extended spectrum beta lactamase (esbl) resistance [a bacteria that can't be killed by many of the antibiotics that doctors use to treat infections, like penicillin's and some cephalosporins for urinary tract infections], and urinary tract infection. A record review of Resident #1's admission MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #61 was an [AGE] year-old male admitted from an acute care hospital for support and rehabilitation related to a urinary tract infection. A record review of Resident #1's death in facility MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #61 was an [AGE] year-old male discharged for a death in the facility. A record review of Resident #61's physicians order dated [DATE] revealed RN R documented a physician's order for Resident #61 to receive care as Full Code. A record review of Resident #61's care plan dated [DATE], revealed, Resident #61 has an advance Directive as evidenced by: Full code status Date Initiated: [DATE] .wishes will be honored, Date Initiated: [DATE] .CPR will be performed as ordered A record review of the EMS TripTix EMS Patient Care Record dated [DATE] revealed, CPR was performed by the facility staff for 9 minutes from 09:38 AM to 09:47 AM as evidenced by, Incident Date / Times .unit notified by dispatch [DATE] 09:41 [AM] .Unit En Route [DATE] 09:43 [AM] .Unit Arrived on Scene [DATE] 09:45 [AM] .Arrived at patient [DATE] 09:47 [AM] .Unit left scene [DATE] 10:04 [AM] .complaints and impressions; cardiac arrest, onset date and time [DATE] 09:38 [AM], . AED used prior to EMS NO . further review revealed a summary which documented the facility had performed CPR chest compressions and oxygenated recue breathing but had not used the AED, the EMTs provided medications and applied the EMS AED and revealed Resident #61 had regained an irregular heartbeat after EMS care and medications administered intraosseous [directly into the bone marrow]. A record review of Resident #61's medical records did not evidence any detailed documentation related to the CPR care provided, such as when Resident #61 was discovered unresponsive, if an AED was presented for care, if the AED was used, et cetera. During an interview on [DATE] at 07:40 PM LVN A stated on [DATE] around 09:30 to 10:00 AM CNAs AB and AC reported to her Resident #61 was unresponsive. LVN A stated she told the CNAs to get RN C and immediately arrived at Resident #61's bed side. LVN A stated she assessed Resident #61 as a full code and without a pulse and not breathing. LVN A stated she began emergency CPR with chest compressions and RN C arrived at the bedside quickly. LVN A stated RN C assumed chest compressions and told her to get the crash cart and call 911. LVN A stated she ran to retrieve the crash cart and along the way told LVN B to call 911. LVN A stated she returned to Resident #61 with the crash cart and resumed chest compressions while RN C administered oxygen with rescue breaths. LVN A stated 911 EMT's were at the bedside quickly around 4-7 minutes maybe. LVN A stated EMS took over and Resident #61 was assessed with a pulse and left for the hospital with EMS. LVN A stated she was trained for CPR by the American Heart Association. LVN A stated the AED was stored on the crash cart and was immediately available upon arrival at Resident #61's bedside. LVN A stated the AED was never opened, removed from the case, or from the crash cart. LVN A stated she was so involved in providing CPR chest compressions and recue breaths she did not think about the AED. LVN A stated she was trained for CPR by the American Heart Association. LVN A stated her training included the use of an AED during CPR as soon as the AED is available. LVN A stated she had not documented her role in Resident #61's CPR care to include times and details of care such as the use of an AED, LVN A stated she believed RN C had documented the CPR care. During an interview on [DATE] at 06:00 AM RN C stated on [DATE] she worked from 06:00 AM to 02:00 PM. RN C stated she was providing patient care when CNAs AB and AC told her LVN A needed her, and Resident #61 was unresponsive. RN C stated she ran to Resident #61's bedside and assessed Resident #61 as unresponsive and told LVN A to get the crash cart and call 911. RN C stated she began CPR chest compressions. RN C stated LVN A returned with the crash-cart, and they switched CPR roles and LVN A continued chest compressions while RN C administered oxygenated rescue breaths. RN C stated 911 EMS arrived quickly and continued CPR. RN C stated the facility's AED was stored on the facility's crash-cart and was immediately available when the crash-cart arrived but she nor LVN A gave it a though due to the high stress of providing CPR. RN C stated she and LVN A provided CPR for maybe 5 minutes and 911 arrived quickly. RN C stated she was CPR trained by the American Heart Association. RN C stated her training included the use of an AED during CPR as soon as the AED is available. RN C stated she had not documented her role in Resident #61's CPR care to include times and details of care such as the use of an AED, RN C stated she believed the DON and / or LVN A had documented the CPR care. A record review of the facility's Charting and Documentation policy dated [DATE], revealed, policy statement; all services provided to the Resident, progress towards the care plan goals, or any changes in the Residents' medical, physical, functional, or psychosocial condition, shall be documented in the residence medical record. the medical record should facilitate communication between the interdisciplinary team regarding the residence condition and response to care. policy interpretation and implementation: the following information is to be documented in the resident medical record: objective observations, medications administered, treatments or services perform, changes in the residence condition, events, incidents or accidents involving the Resident . documentation of procedures and treatment will include care specific details, including: the date and the time the procedure treatment was provided; the name and title of the individuals who provided the care; the assessment data and or any unusual findings obtained during the procedure treatment; the signature and title of the individual documenting.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

QAPI Program (Tag F0867)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to establish and implement written policies and procedures for feedba...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to establish and implement written policies and procedures for feedback, data collections systems, and monitoring, including adverse event monitoring. The policies and procedures must include, at a minimum, the following: Facility adverse event monitoring, including the methods by which the facility will systematically identify, report, track, investigate, analyze and use data and information relating to adverse events in the facility, including how the facility will use the data to develop activities to prevent adverse events for 1 of 1 Resident(s) reviewed (Resident #61) for an adverse CPR event, in that: The DON did not report Resident #61's CPR event for QAPI review. This failure could place residents at risk for adverse health outcome by denying the QAPI committee the data for review. The findings included: A record review of Resident #1's admission record dated, [DATE], revealed an admission date of [DATE] and a death discharge date of [DATE], with diagnoses which included altered mental status, extended spectrum beta lactamase (esbl) resistance [a bacteria that can't be killed by many of the antibiotics that doctors use to treat infections, like penicillin's and some cephalosporins for urinary tract infections], and urinary tract infection. A record review of Resident #1's admission MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #61 was an [AGE] year-old male admitted from an acute care hospital for support and rehabilitation related to a urinary tract infection. A record review of Resident #1's death in facility MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #61 was an [AGE] year-old male discharged for a death in the facility. A record review of Resident #61's physicians order dated [DATE] revealed RN R documented a physician's order for Resident #61 to receive care as Full Code. A record review of Resident #61's care plan dated [DATE], revealed, Resident #61 has an advance Directive as evidenced by: Full code status Date Initiated: [DATE] .wishes will be honored, Date Initiated: [DATE] .CPR will be performed as ordered A record review of Resident #61's SBAR [Situation, Background, Appearance, and Review] document dated [DATE] revealed, Situation .the change in condition, symptoms, or signs observed, and evaluated is/are: cardiac arrest, respiratory arrest. This started on: [DATE]. Since this started it has gotten: stayed the same .Resident / Patient Evaluation .mental status evaluation: unresponsiveness .Code Status: Full Code .Appearance, summarize your observations and evaluation: CNA notified this nurse of resident being unresponsive assessed resident not responsive no pulse RN supervisor notified initiated CPR crash card access notified 911 CPR performed until paramedics arrived emergency medical technicians continued with CPR resident transfers out with Pulse unconscious accompanied by three emergency medical technicians . A record review of the EMS TripTix EMS Patient Care Record dated [DATE] revealed, CPR was performed by the facility staff for 9 minutes from 09:38 AM to 09:47 AM as evidenced by, Incident Date / Times .unit notified by dispatch [DATE] 09:41 [AM] .Unit En Route [DATE] 09:43 [AM] .Unit Arrived on Scene [DATE] 09:45 [AM] .Arrived at patient [DATE] 09:47 [AM] .Unit left scene [DATE] 10:04 [AM] .complaints and impressions; cardiac arrest, onset date and time [DATE] 09:38 [AM], . AED used prior to EMS NO . further review revealed a summary which documented the facility had performed CPR chest compressions and oxygenated recue breathing but had not used the AED, the EMTs provided medications and applied the EMS AED and revealed Resident #61 had regained an irregular heartbeat after EMS care and medications administered intraosseous [directly into the bone marrow]. A record review of Resident #61's medical records did not evidence any detailed documentation related to the CPR care provided, such as when Resident #61 was discovered unresponsive, if an AED was presented for care, if the AED was used, et cetera. A record review of the facility's QAPI monthly meeting roster dated [DATE] which reviewed [DATE] revealed the DON's signature to indicate attendance. During an interview and observation on [DATE] at 02:28 PM the DON stated sometime in [DATE] Resident #61 was discovered unresponsive and was provided emergency CPR care. The DON stated she was not certain if the AED used. The DON stated she believed LVN A, LVN B, and RN C were directly involved with Resident #1's CPR care. The DON stated she had not completed an incident report and had not presented the CPR event to the QAPI committee. The DON stated she attended the QAPI committee meeting monthly and had attended the [DATE], QAPI meeting, the DON stated, Why would I bring it to QAPI? A record review of the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program, policy dated February 2020, revealed, Policy Statement: this facility shall develop, implement, and maintain an ongoing, facility wide, data-driven QAPI program that is focused on indicators of the outcomes of care and quality of life for our residents. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: the objectives of the QAPI program are to: providing means to measure current and potential indicators for outcomes of care and quality of life. provide a means to establish and implement performance improvement projects to correct identified negative or problematic indicators. reinforce and build upon effective systems and processes related to the delivery of quality care and services. it stablished systems through which to monitor and evaluate corrective action .Implementation: . The QAPI plan describes the process for identifying and correcting quality deficiencies . the committee meets monthly to review reports, evaluate data, and monitor QAPI related activities and make adjustments to the plan.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0925 (Tag F0925)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program so that the ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program so that the facility is free of pests and rodents for 1 of 1 facility in that: Resident # #39 was sitting outside on his wheelchair and a live wasp was near him, the wasp were above him under the roof soffit had holes. The facility had 7 live wasp and 7 nests in water puddles and the roof soffits had holes with wasp and wasp nest. This could effect residents sitting outside the facility and could result in residents being stung The findings were: Record review of Resident #39's admission Record dated 8/4/2023 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE], age [AGE], with diagnoses of muscle wasting and atrophy, aphasia (loss of ability to understand or express speech, caused by brain damage), diabetes II ( a metabolic disease, involving inappropriately elevated blood glucose levels), hemiplegia and hemiparesis (means you can't move or control the muscles in the affected body part.) following a cerebral infarction, vascular dementia, heart failure, and cellulitis (a common bacterial skin infection that causes redness, swelling, and pain in the infected area of the skin). Record review of Resident #39's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed Section C- cognition BIM score was 99 (severely impaired), and he had short and long-term memory problems. Section G Functional Status for transfer/dressing/personal hygiene and showers revealed the resident required extensive assistance with one person assistance, Record review of Resident #39's care plan dated 6/21/2023 revealed Resident #39 had a strong preference to be outdoors rather than attend activities. Resident #39 sat alone on the patio/porch for long periods of time. Interventions included: coordinate nursing for protection from environment by making sure he stayed hydrated with fluids, wore sunscreen, and proper clothing for the weather. Resident #39 had an ADL self-care performance deficit related to dementia and hemiplegia. The intervention was for transfers/personal hygiene/dressing/showers Resident #39 required extensive assistance by 1 staff to move between surfaces. Resident #39 had a communication problem related to history of stroke and was non-verbal, very unclear speech. Observation on 8/4/2023 between 9:55 AM-10:21 AM, ADMN AA revealed the perimeter (all sides) of the facility and saw 7 live wasps flying around water puddles and around soffits (the underside of an architectural structure such as an arch, a balcony, or overhanging eaves) .7 wasp nests were observed. Observation on 8/4/2023 at 10:02 AM revealed Resident #39 was sitting in front of facility, outside in his wheelchair. Further observation revealed close to the rood soffit there was a hole that a wasp was swarming around. Resident #39 was non-verbal. Interview on 8/4/2023 at 10:22 AM, ADMN AA stated when walking around the perimeter of the facility, he confirmed 7 live wasps flying around water puddles and soffits and 7 wasp nests. Interview on 8/4/2023 at 10:54 AM with the Maintenance Director revealed the pest control company came to facility about 3 weeks ago and sprayed around the building for wasp and other insects. The Maintenance Director stated the pest control company came every 2 weeks. Interview on at 8/04/2023 at 12:56 PM, ADMN AA stated the risk for wasps close to the building when residents were outside was they could be stung. Record review of the pest control log/invoice dated 7/20/2023 and August 2023 visits did indicate the pest control company had visited and sprayed wasp and other insects. Record review of the policy date May 2008 revealed Pest Control Our Facility shall maintain an effective pest control program. 1. This facility maintains an on-going pest control program to ensure that the building is kept free of insects and rodents
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0582 (Tag F0582)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility must inform each Medicaid-eligible resident, in writing, at the time of admiss...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility must inform each Medicaid-eligible resident, in writing, at the time of admission to the nursing facility and when the resident becomes eligible for Medicaid of, Those other items and services that the facility offers and for which the resident may be charged, and the amount of charges for those services for 4 of 5 (Residents #42, #3, #59, #38) residents reviewed for NOMC (Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage) services in that: 1 Resident #42 was discharged from therapy services on 04/7/2023 and did not receive/documentation of the cost if he would resume therapy. 2. Resident #3 was discharged from therapy services on 07/14/2023, and did not receive/documentation of the cost if she would resume therapy 3. Resident #59 was discharged from therapy services on 07/18/2023 and did not receive/documentation of the cost if he would resume therapy 4. Resident #38 was discharged from therapy services on 05/24/2023, and did not receive/documentation of the cost if he would resume therapy This failure could result in residents not receiving therapy services. The Findings were: 1. Record review of Resident #42 admission record dated 8/4/2023 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE], readmitted on [DATE], discharged on 8/2/2023 and had Medicare health insurance. Resident #42 was diagnosed with diabetes II, dysphagia (Unspecified. It is a disorder characterized by difficulty in swallowing), dementia, anxiety, cognitive communication deficit, lack of coordination, muscle weakness, and anorexia(eating disorder). Review of Resident 42's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed his BIMs score was 5/15 (severely impaired). Record review of Resident #42's NOMNC revealed the effective dated coverage of the current SNF services would end: 4/7/2023. The form was signed by Resident #42 and dated on 4/4/2023. Resident #42's ABN revealed D. skilled nursing, E. Reason Medicare may not pay: no skill need, F. Estimated cost: was blank. The form was signed by Resident #42 and dated 4/4/2023. 2. Record review of Resident #38's admission record dated 8/4/2023 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE], discharged home on 7/15/2023 and had Medicare health insurance. Resident #38 was diagnosed with diabetes II, muscle weakness, dysphagia, heart failure, anemia, cognitive communications deficit, and anxiety. Review of Resident 38's Quarterly MDS dated 6/20/2023 revealed her BIMs score was 7/15 (severely impaired). Record review of Resident #38's NOMNC revealed effective date coverage exhausted for SNF services would end: 7/14/2023. The form was signed by Resident #38 and dated on 7/12/2023. Resident #38's ABN revealed D. skilled services, E. Reason Medicare may not pay: exhausted days, F. Estimated cost-was blank. The form was signed by Resident #38 and dated 7/12/2023. 3. Record review of Resident #59's admission record dated 8/4/2023 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE], discharged on 7/19/2023 and had Medicare health insurance. Resident #59 was diagnosed with muscle weakness, age related physical debility, dysphagia and lack of coordination. Review of Resident 59''s admission MDS dated [DATE] revealed his BIMs score was 10/15 (moderately impaired). Record review of Resident #59's NOMC effective date coverage exhausted of your current SNF services will end: 7/18/2023, this form was signed by Resident #59 and dated on 7/14/2023. Resident #59's Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (ABN) D. skilled services, E. Reason Medicare may not pay: exhausted days, F. Estimated cost-was blank, this form was signed by Resident #59 and dated 7/14/2023. 4. Record review of Resident #3's admission record dated 8/4/2023 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had Medicare health insurance. Resident #3 was his own responsible party and was diagnosed with muscle wasting and atrophy, respiratory failure, dysphagia, dementia, cognitive communications deficit, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, and repeated falls. Review of Resident 3's Annual MDS dated [DATE] revealed his BIMs score was 13/15 (cognitively intact). Record review of Resident #3's NOMC effective dated coverage exhausted of your current SNF services will end: 5/24/2023, this form was signed by Resident #3 and dated on 5/19/2023. Resident #3's Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (ABN) D. skilled services, E. Reason Medicare may not pay: no skill need, F. Estimated cost-was blank, this form was signed by Resident #3 and dated 5/19/2023. Interview on 8/2/2023 at 4:14 PM revealed Resident #3 was confused and did not understand the surveyor. Interview on 8/3/2023 at 3:49 PM the BOM stated she started working as BOM on 7/5/2023. She stated she completed the NOMC for Resident #59 and was not aware that a cost should be documented and discussed with the resident. The BOM before her did the rest of the residents' NOMC/ABN letters with no cost, so, she followed that and she stated she was not trained before this week when Regional Account received resource was training her this week. Interview on 8/2/2023 at 1:02 PM ADMN AA stated he was made aware of residents not receiving the cost for services by the BOM. Administrator AA stated the risk would be residents would not receive services. Record review of the policy Medicare Advance Beneficiary and Medicare Non-Coverage Notices (ABN/NOMC) dated 9/2022 revealed 2c. termination- in the situation in which the facility proposes to stop furnishing all extended care items or services to a beneficiary because it expects that Medicare will not continue to pay for the items or services that is physician had ordered and the beneficiary would lie to continue receiving the care, the SNF ABN is issued to the beneficiary before such extended care items or services are terminated. 3. The resident (or representative) is informed that they may choose to continue receiving the skilled serviced that may not be paid for by Medicare and assume financial responsibility.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Grievances (Tag F0585)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to support resident rights to voice grievances to the facility or oth...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to support resident rights to voice grievances to the facility or other agency or entity that hears grievances without discrimination or reprisal and without fear of discrimination or reprisal. Such grievances include those with respect to care and treatment which has been furnished as well as that which has not been furnished, the behavior of staff and of other residents, and other concerns regarding their LTC facility stay, for 1 of 29 residents (Resident #1) and 5 of 8 months (January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August) reviewed for grievances, in that; 1. RN R did not initiate a grievance report on behalf of Resident #1 when Resident #1 reported mistreatment by CNA V. 2. The facility did not document and resolve grievances for residents for the months of April, May, June, July, August 2023. This failure could place residents at risk by denying their right to make and have grievances heard and contributed to feelings of not being heard and have unresolved issues. The findings included: 1. A record review of Resident #1's admission record dated 08/05/2023, revealed an admission date of 04/23/2023 with diagnoses which included muscle wasting and atrophy, asthma [a chronic (long-term) condition that affects the airways in the lungs], and edema [swelling caused by too much fluid trapped in the body's tissues]. A record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], revealed Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted for rehabilitation with the first day of Medicare covered stay as 04/24/2023. Further review revealed Resident #1 was assessed as a BIMS of 15 out of 15 indicating no mental cognition impairment. A record review of Resident #1's care plan dated 08/05/2023, revealed, wishes to return home upon completion of therapy goals . Evaluate and discuss with resident the prognosis for independent or assisted living. Identify, discuss, and address limitations, risks, benefits, and needs for maximum . Make arrangements with required community resources to support independence. During an interview on 08/01/23 at 11:10 AM Resident # 1 stated on 07/31/2022 [Monday] in the mid-morning she had asked CNA V for her linens to be changed due to her linens were not changed in a week and were soiled. Resident #1 stated she spent the day in her wheelchair and after she was provided a shower and then CNA V returned her [Resident #1] to bed, but that evening, Resident #1 recognized her linens were still soiled and only the bed cover had been changed. Resident #1 stated she complained to RN R that CNA V did not change her linens and was rough and rude to her during care. Resident #1 stated CNA V came in her room turned off the call light and never returned. Resident #1 stated she re-ignited the call light and CNA V returned and stated it was not Resident #1's turn for care and would return later on, Resident #1 stated she complained to RN R. During an interview on 08/01/23 at 03:10 PM RN R stated she usually worked the 02:00 PM to 10:00 PM. RN R stated Resident #1 had made a complaint to her last night 07/31/2023, concerning CNA V. RN R stated Resident #1 did not want CNA V to care for her. RN R stated she made a mental note to not have CNA V care for her that evening. RN R stated she had not reported the complaint to anyone and had not documented the complaint. 2. During a record review of the facility's grievances report binder revealed scant grievance reports for the months of January thru March 2023 and no grievances reported for the months of April, May, June, July, and August 2023. During (an interview) while in the resident group meeting, where 10 residents were in attendance, on 08/02/2023 at 10:00 a.m., A resident stated he did not know how or where to file a grievance and a few other resident's shook their heads yes, which agreed with him. A resident stated she was told by an unknown staff member that they would return with a written up grievance, but that unknown staff member never returned with said grievance form. Some of the residents, who attended, stated they were not aware of the actual grievance form. During an interview on 08/02/2023 at 10:45 AM the DON and ADMN AA stated there were no grievances for the months of April, May, June, July, and August 2023. ADMN AA stated he was the Administrator since 07/17/2023 and the previous ADMN (ADMN Z) was the ADMN from January 2023 to 07/14/2023. ADMN AA, further stated, he had no comment regarding ADMN Z's grievance reported work. The DON stated ADMN Z was responsible for overseeing grievances. The DON stated there were no grievances reported for Resident #1. A record review of Resident #1's nursing progress notes revealed the DON documented on 08/02/2023, it was brought to my attention that [Resident #1] had a concern, upon speaking with [Resident #1], she reported that she had a concern with [CNA V]. [Resident #1] stated that on Monday, 07/31/2023, [Resident #1] told [CNA V] that she [Resident #1] wanted a shower and would like her linens changed. She [Resident #1] said that upon returning to her room from showering her linen was not changed. She [Resident #1] stated that the top comforter was changed but the fitted sheet and pillowcase were not changed. She [Resident #1] said she knew the linen was not changed because she had a scratch on her arm that was bleeding and the sheet still had blood on it. I [DON] asked her [Resident #1] if she believed [CNA V] had malicious intent towards her [Resident #1]? She [Resident #1] said no. I [DON] asked if she [Resident #1] felt there was any tension between herself and [CNA V]? she [Resident #1]reports that there is not, but she [Resident #1] is disappointed that her linen[s] was not fully changed and prefers that [CNA V] not provide her care for her going forward. A record review of the facility's Grievance /Complaints, Filing policy dated April 2017, revealed, policy statement; residents and their representatives have the right to file grievances, either orally or in writing, to the facility staff or to the agency designated to hear grievances. Policy interpretation and implementation [ .] any Resident, family member, or appointed resident representative may file a grievance or complaint concerning care, treatment, behavior of other residents, staff members theft of property, are any other concerns regarding his or her stay at the facility. Grievances also may be voiced or filed regarding care that has not been furnished., all grievances complaints or recommendations stemming from resident or family groups concerning issues of resident care in the facility will be considered actions on such issues will be responded to in writing, including a rationale for the response. Upon receipt of a grievance and or complaint the grievance officer will review and investigate the allegations and submit a written report of such findings to the administrator within five working days of receiving the grievance and or complaint.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Abuse Prevention Policies (Tag F0607)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on interview and record review the facility failed to implement written policies and procedures that: Prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation of residents and misappropriation of r...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to implement written policies and procedures that: Prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation of residents and misappropriation of resident property for 3 of 5 (NA AC, LVN I, Housekeeper AD) new staff hired within the last 4 months review, in that: 1. NA AC did not have her EMR/NAR checked before the hire date. 2. LVN I did not have her EMR/NAR checked before the hire date. 3. Housekeeper AD did not have her EMR/NAR checked before the hire date. This could place residents safety at risk of abuse, neglect, exploitation or misappropriation due to staff not being fully screened to determine employment eligibility. The Findings were: Record review of the policy Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program dated Aril 2021 revealed Policy Statement: Resident s have the right to be free from abuse, neglect and misappropriation of resident property and exploitation. This includes but is not limited to freedom from corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, verbal, mental, sexual or physical abuse and physical or chemical restraint not required to treat the resident symptoms.4. Conduct employee background checks and not knowingly employ or otherwise engage any individual who had been found guilty, had been filed/ entered into the state nurse aide registry and a disciplinary action in effect against his or her professional license by a state licensure body as a result of finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, or mistreatment by a court of law. Record review of the staffing list dated on 8/1/2023 with names, position, and date of hires included and review of personal files: 1. NA AC was hired on 5/12/2023. She did not have the EMR/NAR checked before the hire date. 2. LVN I was hired on 6/29/2023. He did not have the EMR/NAR checked before the hire date. 3. Housekeeper AD was hired on 3/6/2023. She did not have the EMR/NAR checked before the hire date. Record review of NA AC, LVN I and Housekeeper AD background checks dated 8/4/2023 were eligible to be hired. Interview on 8/4/2023 at 7 PM with HR confirmed NA AC, LVN I, and Housekeeper AD had to be re-checked after survey entrance due to not being able to find their original EMR/NAR checks. HR stated she was responsible for ensuring the staff had their background checks before they started working on the floor. Interview on 8/5/2023 at 1:26 PM with the ADMN AA stated he was not aware that staff were missing their background checks. ADMN AA stated the Administrator and corporate should be monitoring HR to ensure the job task and the risk would be hiring staff that were unemployable.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitati...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source are reported immediately to the administrator of the facility and to other officials, including to the State Survey Agency in accordance with State law through established procedures, for 1 of 1 facility's reviewed for abuse, neglect, exploitation, and/or mistreatment allegations, for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for reporting mistreatment, in that: 1. The facility experienced a faulty heating ventilation air conditioning [HVAC] system for the A-hall on June 26, 2023, and did not report the allegation of neglect for physical environment to the state agency. 2. RN R did not report on behalf of Resident #1 an allegation of mistreatment by CNA V. This failure could place residents at risk for harm by abuse and mistreatment, heat stress and the lack of a comfortable homelike environment during a heat crisis of 100 degrees F+ for weeks. The findings included: 1. A record review of the facility's HVAC contractors email dated 08/01/2023, revealed, original ticket for A-hall June 26, 2023 made temporary repairs for txv [an essential valve for the air conditioner] to come in from factory. Spoke with the vendor today we will have it installed next week. During an observation on 08/01/2023 at 09:00 AM revealed the facility presented with the A-hall doors closed off due to a faulty air conditioner HVAC system. A record review of the facility's Texas Unified Licensure Portal [TULIP] website account page, accessed 08/01/2023, did not reveal any reports of neglect / physical environment for the failed HVAC system. During an interview on 08/01/2023 at 10:00 AM the DON stated the facility census was 63 and no one resided in the A-hall due to the heat and the air conditioner was not functioning. A record review of the Past Weather in City of [Name of City], Texas, USA - June 2023 website accessed 08/14/2023, https://www.timeanddate.com/weather/@7174100/historic?month=6&year=2023 , revealed the temperature on 06/26/2023 was 103?F. further reviews revealed multiple days in July and August 2023 were 103 degrees F-105 degrees F. During an interview on 08/02/2023 at 09:04 AM the Maintenance Director stated the HVAC for the A-hall had been inoperative since the end of June, beginning of July 2023. The Maintenance Director stated the A-hall had no residents due to a reduced census and the A-hall was consolidated and residents were moved to the rest of the facility. The Maintenance Director stated the Administrator at the time was not the current Administrator but was the previous Administrator. The Maintenance Director stated the previous Administrator was informed of the A-hall HVAC system failure and was involved in receiving the estimate for the repairs and was fully aware of the HVAC failure. The Maintenance Director stated the repairs were delayed due to parts were on backorder. The Maintenance Director stated he had no knowledge if the failure was reported to the state agency. During an interview on 08/02/2023 at 10:45 AM the current Administrator stated he has been the Administrator since July 2023 after the previous Administrator left sometime mid-July 2023. The Administrator stated he had not reported the A-hall HVAC failure to the state agency and was not aware if the previous Administrator had reported the HVAC failure to the state agency. The Administrator stated he would generate a facility related incident report with the TULIP website. A record review of the facility's Unusual Occurrence Reporting policy dated December 2007, revealed, policy statement: as required by federal or state regulations, our facility reports unusual occurrences or other reportable events which affect the health, safety, our welfare of our residents, employees, or visitors. policy interpretation and implementation; our facility will report the following events to appropriate agencies: . other occurrences that interfere with facility operations and affect the welfare, safety, or health of residents, employees or visitors. unusual occurrences shall be reported via telephone to appropriate agencies as required by current law and or regulations within 24 hours of such incident or as otherwise required by federal and state regulations. a written report detailing the incident and actions taken by the facility after the event shall be sent or delivered to the state agency and other appropriate agencies as required by law within 48 hours of reporting the event or as required by federal and state regulations. the administration will keep a copy of written reports on file. 2. A record review of Resident #1's admission record dated 08/05/2023, revealed an admission date of 04/23/2023 with diagnoses which included muscle wasting and atrophy, asthma [a chronic (long-term) condition that affects the airways in the lungs], and edema [swelling caused by too much fluid trapped in the body's tissues]. A record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], revealed Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted for rehabilitation with the first day of Medicare covered stay as 04/24/2023. Further review revealed Resident #1 was assessed as a BIMS of 15 out of 15 indicating no mental cognition impairment. A record review of Resident #1's care plan dated 08/05/2023, revealed, wishes to return home upon completion of therapy goals . Evaluate and discuss with resident the prognosis for independent or assisted living. Identify, discuss, and address limitations, risks, benefits, and needs for maximum . Make arrangements with required community resources to support independence. During an interview on 08/01/23 at 11:10 AM Resident # 1 stated on 07/31/2022 [Monday] in the mid-morning she had asked CNA V for her linens to be changed due to her linens were not changed in a week and were soiled. Resident #1 stated she spent the day in her wheelchair and after she was provided a shower and then CNA V returned her [Resident #1] to bed, but that evening, Resident #1 recognized her linens were still soiled and only the bed cover had been changed. Resident #1 stated she complained to RN R that CNA V did not change her linens and was rough and rude to her during care. Resident #1 stated CNA V came in her room turned off the call light and never returned. Resident #1 stated she re-ignited the call light and CNA V returned and stated it was not Resident #1's turn for care and would return later on, Resident #1 stated she complained to RN R. During an interview on 08/01/23 at 03:10 PM RN R stated she usually worked the 02:00 PM to 10:00 PM. RN R stated Resident #1 had made a complaint to her last night 07/31/2023, concerning CNA V. RN R stated Resident #1 did not want CNA V to care for her. RN R stated she made a mental note to not have CNA V care for her that evening. RN R stated she had not reported the complaint to anyone and had not documented the complaint. During a record review of the facility's grievances report binder revealed scant grievance reports for the months of January thru March 2023 and no grievance reports for the months of April, May, June, July, and August 2023. During an interview on 08/02/2023 at 10:45 AM the DON and ADMN AA stated no one had reported an allegation of mistreatment for Resident #1. The DON stated there were no grievances reported for Resident #1. ADMN AA received a report from the surveyor Resident #1 made an allegation of mistreatment and/or neglect to RN R and the surveyor. ADMN AA stated he would initiate an investigation and report the allegation to the state survey agency. A record review of Resident #1's nursing progress notes revealed the DON documented on 08/02/2023 at 1:30 PM, it was brought to my attention that [Resident #1] had a concern, upon speaking with [Resident #1], she reported that she had a concern with [CNA V]. [Resident #1] stated that on Monday, 07/31/2023, [Resident #1] told [CNA V] that she [Resident #1] wanted a shower and would like her linens changed. She [Resident #1] said that upon returning to her room from showering her linen was not changed. She [Resident #1] stated that the top comforter was changed but the fitted sheet and pillowcase were not changed. She [Resident #1] said she knew the linen was not changed because she had a scratch on her arm that was bleeding and the sheet still had blood on it. I [DON] asked her [Resident #1] if she believed [CNA V] had malicious intent towards her [Resident #1]? She [Resident #1] said no. I [DON] asked if she [Resident #1] felt there was any tension between herself and [CNA V]? she [Resident #1]reports that there is not, but she [Resident #1] is disappointed that her linen[s] was not fully changed and prefers that [CNA V] not provide her care for her going forward. A record review of the facility's Abuse Investigating and Reporting undated policy revealed, policy statement: all reports of resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property, mistreatment and or injuries of unknown source shall be properly reported to local, state, and federal agency and thoroughly investigated by facility management. Findings of abuse investigations will also be reported. policy interpretation and implementation: roll of the Administrator: If an incident or suspected incident of resident abuse, mistreatment, neglect or injury of unknown source is reported, the administrator will assign the instigation to an appropriate individual [ .] reporting: All alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries from an unknown source and misappropriation of property will be reported by the facility administrator or his or her designee to the following persons or agencies [ .] the state licensing certification agency responsible for surveying licensing the facility.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the facility must develop and implement a comprehensive perso...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the facility must develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 3 of 33 (Resident #46, #10, and #1) residents reviewed, in that: 1. Resident #46's care plan did not address that they were was PASRR positive. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #10's care plan was updated to pureed diet. 3. The facility failed to revise a comprehensive care plan for Resident #1's needs for durable medical equipment. These deficient practices could place residents at risk of receiving the incorrect care and cause health complications with subsequent illness. The findings were: 1. Record review of Resident #46's admission record dated 8/4/2023 revealed his diagnoses of moderate intellectual disabilities, unspecified intellectual disabilities, pervasive developmental disorder, fragile x chromosome (an inherited condition characterized by an X chromosome that is abnormally susceptible to damage, especially by folic acid deficiency. Affected individuals tend to have limited intellectual functions), and cognitive communications deficit. Record review of Resident #46's PASRR Level 1 dated 4/21/23 revealed he was positive for ID and DD. Record review of Resident #46's PASRR Evaluation dated 4/28/23 revealed he was positive for ID, DD. Resident #46 reveled the recommendation was service coordination. Record review of Resident #46's PSCP dated 5/10/23 revealed he refused services and the resident was only interested in HC (service coordination) services. Record review of Resident #46's admission MDS dated [DATE] revealed sections A Identification A. 1500 PASRR, A1510 Level II PASRR conditions B. intellectual disability marked yes, C. Level II PASSR conditions: other related conditions-yes. Record review of Resident #46's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed Cognition Pattern BIMS summary 12/15 (moderately impaired). Record review of Resident #46's care plan dated 4/21/2023 revealed Resident #46 had impaired cognition functions/dementia or impaired thought process related to impaired decision-making, short-term memory loss, and dx of intellectual disability. The care plan did not address Resident #46's PASRR status. Interview on 8/3/2023 at 3:18 PM MDS H stated she was not able to see PASRR positive care plan for Resident #46. MDS H stated she was not sure why PASRR services was not on the care plan for Resident #46. MDS H stated she was responsible for PASRR care plans and stated PASSAR should be in Resident #46's care plan Interview on 8/5/2023 at 12:31 PM MDS H stated Resident #46 did receive visits from the PASRR service agent twice a month. Interview on 8/5/2023 at 10:30 AM with ADMN AA stated he was informed that Resident #46 did not have a care plan for being a PASRR positive and the risk would be the resident not receiving a person-centered care plan. Record review of the policy Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered dated 2002 revealed 3. The care plan interventions are derived form a thorough analysis of the information gathered as part of the comprehensive assessment. 7. The comprehensive, person-centered care plan: 2, any specialized serviced to be provided as a result of PASRR recommendations 2. Record review of Resident #10's face sheet, dated 08/03/2023, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: dementia, diabetes, protein-calorie malnutrition, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder and anxiety disorder. Record review of Resident #10's annual MDS assessment, dated 06/23/2023, revealed the resident had a BIMS score of 03, which indicated severe cognitive impairment . Record review of Resident #10's physician's orders, dated 08/03/2023, revealed an order entered on 07/21/2023, that reflected Consistent Carbohydrate (CCD) diet Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) Level 1 Puree texture, THIN (Regular) 1 consistency [ .] Record review of Resident #10's, undated, tray card, revealed Diet Txtr: Dysphagia Pureed (Level 1). Record review of Resident #10's care plan, last reviewed 06/11/2023, revealed a Focus initiated 01/23/2023 and revised on 01/02/2023, which reflected CCD mech soft, scoop plate with meals. During an interview and record review on 08/04/2023 at 6:39 p.m., the MDS Coordinator stated Residents #10's care plan was not updated for his pureed diet. She further stated she was unaware of why his care plan was not updated. The MDS Coordinator stated it was an IDT effort to ensure care plans were updated. She stated the potential harm to resident was a choking hazard. During an interview on 08/04/2023 at 6:39 p.m., ADMN AA stated the IDT was ultimately responsible for updating the residents' care plans. He further stated care plans were updated during morning meetings when the IDT went over the 24-hour reports. ADMN AA stated the potential harm was Resident #10 not receiving the correct diet. During an interview on 08/04/2023 at 6:54 p.m., the DON stated care plans were supposed to be updated when the orders were changed. She stated it was the IDT's responsibility to ensure care plans were updated correctly. The DON further stated the IDT went over any changes during their morning meetings and made changes if needed. She stated she was unaware of a potential harm to the resident because the orders were changed correctly 3. A record review of Resident #1's admission record dated 08/05/2023, revealed an admission date of 04/23/2023 with diagnoses which included muscle wasting and atrophy, asthma [a chronic (long-term) condition that affects the airways in the lungs], and edema [swelling caused by too much fluid trapped in the body's tissues]. A record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], revealed Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted for rehabilitation with the first day of Medicare covered stay as 04/24/2023. Further review revealed Resident #1 was assessed as a BIMS of 15 out of 15 indicating no mental cognition impairment. A record review of Resident #1's physician's orders, dated 06/15/2023, revealed Resident #1 was prescribed an air pump set of leg wraps, Apply lymphedema [swollen soft tissue] pump on BLE [bilateral lower extremities] every evening minimum of 40 minutes in the evening. A further review revealed the physician also ordered a set of leg wraps designed to help reduce Resident #1's swollen lower legs, Farrow [garments that are compression devices and are designed to help reduce limb swelling] wraps on in morning off at night every morning and at bedtime. A record review of Resident #1's medical records revealed a doctor's progress note, June 14th, 2023, 01:00 PM [Resident #1] needs to have her left lower extremity elevated at all times she needs to have her wraps all day especially in the morning, please place lymphedema pump in lower extremity every evening for at least 40 minutes A record review of Resident #1's care plan dated 08/05/2023, revealed it did not address Resident #1's needs to reduce her lower leg swelling. During an interview on 08/01/23 at 11:10 AM Resident #1 stated her lower legs were often swollen and painful. Resident #1 stated she was prescribed a set of leg wraps that were inflated by an air pump. Resident #1 stated she wore the leg wraps at night while she slept. Resident #1 stated the CNAs would assist her to remove the wraps in the morning and after her morning hygiene care the CNAs would help her put on the day-time leg wraps. Resident #1 stated the physician also prescribed her a set of leg wraps that helped her keep her legs from swelling too much. During an interview on 08/01/2023 at 11:20 AM RN N stated she was the day RN and was responsible for Resident #1's care. RN N stated she was not aware of Resident #1's care plan but did know about her need for leg wraps to aide Resident #1's lower leg swelling. During an interview on 08/03/2023 at 02:30 PM LVN H stated she was the MDS nurse and assisted the SW to compile and coordinate care plans. LVN H stated she was aware of Resident #1's needs for lower leg wraps. The surveyor reported to LVN H Resident #1's care plan was lacking any directions/plan to guide direct care staff on how to apply, remove, and general directions for care regarding Resident #1's needs for leg wraps. LVN H reviewed the care plan and agreed there were no care plans for Resident #1's needs for leg wraps. LVN H stated she overlooked Resident #1's needs for the leg wraps. During a joint interview on 08/04/2023 at 09:10 AM with the DON and the ADMN AA the DON stated Resident #1 did have a need and did receive leg wraps to support her needs for swollen lower legs. The DON stated she was not aware Resident #1 did not have a care plan which spoke to Resident #1's need for lower leg wraps and Resident #1's care plan should match the care provided. A record review of the facilities Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered policy dated March 2022, revealed, policy statement a comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the residents' physical, psychosocial, and functional needs is developed and implemented for each Resident. policy interpretation and implementation: the interdisciplinary team, in conjunction with the resident and his/her family or legal representative, develops and implements a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for each Resident . the comprehensive, person-centered care plan .describes the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the residents highest practical physical mental and psychosocial well-being Further review revealed under 11 Assessments of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the residents and the residents' conditions change.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Unnecessary Medications (Tag F0759)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate below 5%. The facili...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate below 5%. The facility error was 8% based on 2 errors out of 25 opportunities for 2 of 6 residents (Resident #33 and #267) reviewed for medication administration: 1. LVN F administered Carafate [a medication used to treat and prevent ulcers in the intestines] to Resident #33 and did not follow the physicians order to administer the medication by itself at least 2 hours away from other medications. 2. MA W crushed and administered metoprolol extended release [a medication which lowers blood pressure and should not be crushed] to Resident #267. This deficient practice placed residents at risk for not receiving therapeutic effects of their medications and possible adverse reactions. The findings included: 1. A record review of Resident #33's admission record, dated 08/05/2023, revealed an admission date of 03/30/2023 with diagnoses which included gastrointestinal hemorrhage [ bleeding in the stomach and intestines]. A record review of Resident #33's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], revealed Resident #33 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted for physical therapy rehabilitation. A record review of Resident #33's care plan dated 08/05/2023 revealed, [Resident #33] has GERD related to inappropriate diet [ .] [Resident #33] will remain free from discomfort, complications or signs and symptoms related to the diagnosis of GERD through review date [ .] 06/21/2023 [ .] Give medications as ordered. Observe/document side effects and effectiveness. A record review of Resident #33's physicians orders dated 08/03/2023 revealed the physician ordered for Resident #33 to receive Carafate 2 hours away from other medications, Carafate Oral Tablet 1 GM (Sucralfate) Give 1 tablet by mouth before meals and at bedtime related to GASTROINTESTINAL HEMORRHAGE, UNSPECIFIED; Administer 2 hours apart from other medications. During an observation and record review on 08/03/2023 from 07:32 to 07:34 AM revealed LVN F prepared and administered Carafate together with other medications to Resident #33, as follows: 1. Cholecalciferol Tablet 1000 UNIT Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day related to vitamin d deficiency. 2. Cyanocobalamin Tablet 1000 MCG Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day related to anemia. 3. Folic Acid Oral Tablet 1 MG (Folic Acid) Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for supplement. 4. Coreg Oral Tablet 3.125 MG (Carvedilol) Give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day related to secondary hypertension [high blood pressure]. 5. Divalproex Sodium Oral Tablet Delayed Release 125 MG (Divalproex Sodium) Give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day related to bipolar disorder. 6. Iron Oral Tablet 325 (65 Fe) MG (Ferrous Sulfate) Give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day related to anemia [low iron in blood]. 7. Omeprazole Oral Tablet Delayed Release 20 MG (Omeprazole) Give 20 mg by mouth two times a day related to gastrointestinal hemorrhage [stomach bleeding]. 8. Sodium Chloride Oral Tablet 1 GM (Sodium Chloride) Give 2 tablet by mouth two times a day related to hypoosmolality and hyponatremia [low salt]. 9, Gabapentin Oral Capsule 100 MG (Gabapentin) Give 1 capsule by mouth three times a day related to fibromyalgia [painful muscles]. 10. Carafate Oral Tablet 1 GM (Sucralfate) Give 1 tablet by mouth before meals and at bedtime related to GASTROINTESTINAL HEMORRHAGE, UNSPECIFIED [stomach bleeding] Administer 2 hours apart from other medications. During an interview on 08/04/2023 at 08:34 AM LVN F stated she should have administered the Carafate 2 hours prior to Resident #33's other medications. 2. A record review of Resident #267's admission record dated 08/05/2023 revealed an admission date 07/21/2023 with diagnoses which included essential (primary) hypertension [high blood pressure]. A record review of Resident #267's admission MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #267 was an [AGE] year-old female admitted for long term care. A record review of Resident #267's care plan dated 08/03/2023, revealed, [Resident #267] has impaired cardiovascular status related to: Hypertension [ .] Resident will not have a decline in function related to cardiac condition through next 90 days [ .] Medications as ordered by physician and Observe use and effectiveness. A record review of Resident #267's physicians orders dated 08/03/2023 revealed Resident #267 was prescribed metoprolol [a medication used to lower blood pressure] extended-release form [a pill designed with a coating to slowly dissolve and deliver a low steady dose throughout the day], metoprolol succinate ER Oral Tablet Extended Release 24 Hour 25 MG (Metoprolol Succinate) Give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day . During an observation on 08/03/2023 at 03:30 PM Medication Aide W [MA W] prepared, crushed, and administered metoprolol 25mg extended release 24 hr. to Resident #267. During an interview and record review on 08/04/2023 at 08:34 AM LVN F identified the medication aide cart for Resident #267. LVN f opened the medication cart and demonstrated Resident #267's metoprolol medication card. The card revealed the label which read, metoprolol succinate ER Oral Tablet Extended Release 24 Hour 25 MG (Metoprolol Succinate) Give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day . The surveyor asked LVN F if this medication could be crushed and LVN F stated, it should not be crushed. During an interview on 08/04/2023 at 08:40 PM the DON received a report from the surveyor that the results of the medication observations revealed 2 medication errors; 1) LVN F administered to Resident #33 carafate concurrent with other medications and 2) MA W crushed and administered to resident #267 metoprolol extended-release medication. the DON stated the carafate should have been administered away from other medications and the extended-release formulation of medications should not be crushed. A record review of the facility's Adverse Consequences and Medication Errors dated February 2023, revealed, Policy Heading: The interdisciplinary team monitors medication usage in order to prevent and detect medication-related problems such as adverse drug reactions and side effects. Policy Interpretation and Implementation .Medications Errors 1. A medication error is defined as the preparation or administration of drugs or biologicals which is not in accordance with physician's orders, manufacturer specifications, or accepted professional standards and principles of the professional(s) providing services.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accorda...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 4 of 6 (Residents #35, #20, #2, and #53) residents reviewed for dietary services in that: The kitchen ordered unpasteurized eggs and Residents #35, #20, #2, and #53 were served soft yolks for breakfast: This failure could affect residents that was served over easy eggs and could place them at risk for food borne illnesses. 1. Record review of Resident # 35's admission record dated 8/4/2023 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of muscle weakness, cellulitis (common, potentially serious bacterial skin infection.), insomnia, kidney failure, and history of falls. Record review of Resident # 35's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed section C Cognition Pattern, BIMs score was 15/15 (cognitively intact) and section G Functional Status, eating was independent. Record review of Resident # 35's care plan dated 5/11/2023 revealed Eating-Resident was able to feed self after tray set up and for Diet- Resident #35 was on a regular diet with regular texture. Record review of Resident # 35 consolidated physician's order for August 2023 revealed his diet order was a regular diet, regular texture, regular consistency. Record review of Resident # 35 's diet card revealed for breakfast it was documented he received over medium eggs. During an interview on 8/2/2023 at 1:34 PM Resident #35 stated he had asked and was served over medium (fried) eggs for breakfast and stated he had not been sick. Resident #35 stated he had over medium eggs with the soft yolk since he was admitted . 2. Record review of Resident # 20's admission record dated 8/3/2023 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of anemia, unsteady on feet and osteoarthritis. Record review of Resident # 20's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed section C Cognition Pattern, BIMs score was 99 (modified independence) and section G Functional Status, eating required supervision with set up help only. Record review of Resident # 20's care plan dated 6/19/2023 revealed ADL-Eating-Resident required supervision assistance by 1 staff to eat. Resident #20 was on a regular diet. Record review of Resident # 20's consolidated orders dated August 2023 revealed a diet order of a regular diet, regular texture, regular consistency. Record review of Resident # 20's diet card revealed for breakfast it was documented he received over medium eggs. During an interview on 8/2/2023 at 10:19 AM revealed LVN E checked the breakfast for the last 2 days. LVN E stated Resident # 35 had his eggs over easy, Resident #20 had over easy eggs, this morning with soft yolk. 3. Record review of Resident #2's admission record dated 08/26/2023, revealed an admission date of 10/01/2021 with diagnoses which included type II diabetes and heart failure. Record review of Resident#2's physician's orders revealed Resident #2 was ordered on 03/23/2023, to have a regular diet with regular textures. Record review of Resident #2's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #2 was an [AGE] year-old female admitted for long term care and section C cognition BIMS was 14/15 (cognitively intact). Record review of Resident #2's care plan dated 08/04/2023 revealed, Resident #2 has nutritional problem or potential nutritional problem related to diet restrictions renal diet resident number two is exercising her right to have foods outside of her recommended diet . provide and serve diet as ordered observe intake and record every meal registered dietitian to evaluate and make diet change recommendations as needed. Record review of Resident#2's physician's orders revealed Resident #2 was ordered on 03/23/2023, to have a regular diet with regular textures. Record review of Resident # 2's diet card revealed for breakfast it was documented he received over medium eggs (soft yolk). During an interview on 08/01/2023 at 04:32 PM Resident #2 stated she had sunny-side eggs which were soft and runny for breakfast this morning . 4. Record review of Resident #53's admission record dated 08/06/2023 revealed an admission date of 06/13/2022 with diagnosis which included abnormal weight loss. Record review of Resident #53's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed Resident #53 was an [AGE] year-old female admitted for long term care and section C cognition BIMS was 15/15 (cognitively intact) Record review of Resident #53's care plan dated 08/06/2023 revealed, Resident #53 has nutritional problem or potential nutritional problem .Resident #53 will maintain adequate nutritional status as evidenced by maintaining weight .provide, serve, diet as ordered. Regular diet .regular consistency. Record review of Resident #53's physician's order dated 08/06/2023 revealed Resident #53 was ordered to receive regular diet .regular consistency, ground meats, aid Resident with cutting food items. Record review of Resident # 53's diet card revealed for breakfast it was documented she received over medium eggs (soft yolks). During an interview on 08/01/2023 at 04:35 PM Resident #53 stated her preference for breakfast was sunny side up eggs. Resident #53 stated she had sunny side up eggs this morning and they were runny . Observation on 8/1/2023 at 10:17 AM during initial rounds of the kitchen revealed in the refrigerator a box of eggs. There was no label and the eggs were not stamped as pasteurized with DM (dietary manager). During an interview on 8/01/2023 at 10:18 AM with the DM during initial rounds revealed the box of eggs were not pasteurized and stated 6 residents were served soft yolk eggs. The DM stated he was not sure if eggs were pasteurized and looked at the order from the food supply. The DM stated the order for eggs did not indicate the eggs were pasteurized. The DM stated he called the food supplier and they stated the last order of eggs were not pasteurized . During an interview on 8/02/2023 at 10:36 AM [NAME] X stated she had been working as a cook for facility for 2 yrs. [NAME] X stated Residents #35, #20, #2 and #53 had soft yolk eggs for breakfast every morning. [NAME] X stated she thought the eggs in the refrigerator were pasteurized. During an interview on 8/04/2023 at 12:50 PM ADMN AA stated he was not sure the eggs in the kitchen were not pasteurized. He stated he did round audits in the kitchen every 2 weeks with the Dietitian and DM. The ADMN AA stated the risk was low impact for resident food borne illness and stated no residents were immune comprised. Record review of the policy Food Preparation and Service dated November 2022 revealed Food and Nutrition services employees prepare, distribute and serve food in a manner that complies with safe food handling practices. Food Preparation, Cooking and Holding Time/Temperatures 12. Only pasteurized shell eggs are cooked and served when: a. residents request undercooked, soft-served or sunny side up eggs. Record review of the Food and Drug Administration, dated 2022 revealed TITLE 21--FOOD AND DRUGS, CHAPTER I--FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, SUBCHAPTER B - FOOD FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTION, PART 160 -- EGGS AND EGG PRODUCTS, Subpart B - Requirements for Specific Standardized Eggs and Egg Products, https://www.fda.gov/food/fda-food-code/food-code-2022, 3-202.14 Eggs and Milk Products, Pasteurized., (A) EGG PRODUCTS shall be obtained pasteurized.
MINOR (B)

Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact

Deficiency F0912 (Tag F0912)

Minor procedural issue · This affected multiple residents

Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide a minimum of 80 square feet per resident in 43 of 44 resident rooms (A2 through A8, A10, B3 through B11, C2 through C5, C7, C9, C10,...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide a minimum of 80 square feet per resident in 43 of 44 resident rooms (A2 through A8, A10, B3 through B11, C2 through C5, C7, C9, C10, D2 through D7, E3 through E8, and F2 through F8) reviewed for minimum for square footage per resident, in that: Resident rooms A2 through A8, A10, B3 through B11, C2 through C5, C7, C9, C10, D2 through D7, E3 through E8, and F2 through F8 did not have a minimum of 80 square feet per resident. This deficient practice could affect residents residing in rooms due to the reduced living space for the residents and could pose problems in the residents' activities of daily living. The findings were: During an interview on 08/08/2023 at 10:55 a.m., ADMN Y stated he would be requesting a room waiver on the same rooms from last year which did not provide residents with 80 square feet of floor space. Record review of previous room waiver revealed: Resident rooms A2, A3, A5 through A8, and A10 measured 13 feet 7 inches by 11 feet 5 inches which provided 157.55 square feet of floor space. Dividing the 157.55 square feet of usable floor space by 2 resulted in 78.77 square feet of floor space per resident in these rooms. Room A4 measured 13 feet 6 inches by 11 feet 7 inches which provided 159.12 square feet of usable floor space. Dividing the 159.12 square feet of usable floor space by 2 resulted in 79.56 square feet of floor space per resident in this room. Room B3 measured 13 feet 6 inches by 11 feet 10 inches which provided 150.96 square feet of floor space. Dividing the 150.96 square feet of usable floor space by 2 resulted in 75.48 square feet of floor space per resident in this room. Rooms B4 through B6, B8 through B11, C7, C9, D4, E4, E7 and E8 measured 13 feet 6 inches by 11 feet 5 inches which provided 156.4 square feet of floor space. Dividing the 156.4 square feet of usable floor space by 2 resulted in 78.2 square feet of floor space per resident in these rooms. Room B7, C4, D3, and F7 measured 13 feet 6 inches by 11 feet 6 inches which provided 157.76 square feet of floor space. Dividing the 157.76 square feet of usable floor space by 2 resulted in 78.88 square feet of floor space per resident in these rooms. Room C2, C3, and C5 measured 13 feet 5 inches by 11 feet 5 inches which provided 155.25 square feet of floor space. Dividing the 155.25 square feet of usable floor space by 2 resulted in 77.63 square feet of floor space per resident in these rooms. Room C10, E5, F2, F3, F5, F6. and F8 measured 13 feet 7 inches by 11 feet 5 inches which provided 158.92 square feet of floor space. Dividing the 158.92 square feet of usable floor space by 2 resulted in 79.46 square feet of floor space per resident in these rooms. Room D2, D5 through D7, E3. and E6 measured 13 feet 7 inches by 11 feet 6 inches which provided 157.55 square feet of floor space. Dividing the 157.55 square feet of usable floor space by 2 resulted in 78.77 square feet of floor space per resident in these rooms. Room F4 measured 13 feet 4 inches by 11 feet 4 inches which provided 152.76 square feet of floor space. Dividing the 152.76 square feet of usable floor space by 2 resulted in 76.38 square feet of floor space per resident in this room. Record review of Form 3740, Bed Classifications, signed by the ADMN AA on 08/02/2023 revealed that all resident rooms were double occupancy.
MINOR (C)

Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact

Staffing Information (Tag F0732)

Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the Nurse Staffing Information. Data requirement...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the Nurse Staffing Information. Data requirements. The facility must post the following information on a daily basis: Resident census for 2 of 2 days in that: The nurse staffing postings for 2 days did not have a census and the 18 months ([DATE]-August 3, 2023) of nurse staffing posting did not have a census. This could result in family and residents not being aware of the census for the day. The Findings were: Observation on 8/01/23 at 9:30AM at the front entrance revealed the nurse staffing posting was posted but did not include the census. Observation on 8/02/2023 at 9:10 AM at the front entrance revealed the nurse staffing posting was posted but did not include the census. Record review of 18 months of nurse staffing posting dated from [DATE]-August 3, 2023, revealed the census was missing. Interview on 8/02/2023 at 9:33 AM HR stated she was responsible for posting the nurse staffing information and to make sure the records were retained. HR stated she was not aware that the nurse staffing postings had to have the census included and would make sure from now on. Interview on 8/5/2023 at 10:32 AM with ADMN AA stated the HR person was responsible for the nurse staffing postings and HR made him aware that they were required to post the census. ADMN AA stated the risk would be that the residents/families were not aware of the census for the day. Record review of the policy on Staffing, Sufficient and Competent Nursing dated 2001 revealed the facility provided sufficient numbers of nursing staff with the appropriate skills and competency necessary to provide nursing and related care and services for all residents in accordance with resident care plans and the facility assessment. Competent Staff .6. Direct care daily staffing numbers (the number of nursing personnel responsible for providing direct care to residents) are posted in the facility for every shift.
Jun 2022 9 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0583 (Tag F0583)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to respect the residents' right to confidentiality in his or her personal and medical records for two (Resident #8 and Resident ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to respect the residents' right to confidentiality in his or her personal and medical records for two (Resident #8 and Resident #13) of 21 residents and for 2 medication carts (BCD hallway cart and AF hallway cart) of 4 medications carts, reviewed for secure and confidential medical records, in that: 1. RN E failed to lock the computer used for documenting residents' health information and left Resident #8's and Resident #59's information exposed. 2. LVN G failed to lock hallway AF medication hallway cart's computer used for documenting residents' health information and left several undisclosed residents' medications administrations records exposed. These deficient practices could place residents at risk of resident-identifiable information being accessed by the public. The findings were: 1. Observation on 06/23/22 at 11:52 a.m. revealed a computer by the nurses' station was left unlocked and unattended with residents' information available for approximately 2 minutes. Resident #8's and Resident #59's names, medical record numbers, and room numbers were exposed. During an interview on 06/23/22 at 11:59 a.m. with RN E stated the computer by the nurses' station was left unlocked and unattended with residents' information viewable and she normally locked it. RN E stated she left it unlocked because the Nurse Practitioner was there in the nurse's station and she needed to talk to her. No further information was provided by RN E about the consequences this could have for the residents. 2. Observation on 06/23/22 at 5:22 p.m. revealed a computer by the nurses' station was left unlocked and unattended for approximately four minutes with six residents names, rooms numbers, medical record numbers and pictures exposed. During an interview on 06/23/22 at 5:13 p.m. with RN F revealed medication hallway cart AF was left unattended with computer screen up and unlocked exposing residents' information. RN F signed out of the computer and folded the computer screen down. RN F stated she would talk to LVN G about leaving her computer screen unlocked and unattended. During an interview on 06/24/22 at 2:33 p.m. with the Administrator revealed she did not know if nurses were able to log off the computers with out having to close the computer screen. The Administrator did not elaborate any further. During an interview on 06/24/22 at 3:11 p.m. with the DON revealed staff was trained on protecting residents' electronic medical records and it was the expectation that they protected the residents' information. The DON stated staff should keep computers closed when not at workstations or carts or logged off. The DON stated staff are educated annually regarding signing out of computers. The DON stated staff could lock the computer screen by pressing keys on the keyboard before walking away. The DON stated staff could lock the screen without having to fold down and close the computer screen. The DON stated by leaving protected health information up on the computer we would not have protected residents' private health information. The DON stated this could cause liability issues for the facility and violations of state and federal regulations. The DON stated leaving residents' health information exposed where other residents and visitors could see what is on the computer screen was a violation of HIPAA. Record review of the facility's policy titled, Physical Security of Computer Assets, dated 02/2010, revealed, .3. All workstations with access to Confidential Information must be physically secured and positioned to minimize unauthorized viewing and/or access .
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0661 (Tag F0661)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the failed to provide a recapitulation of the resident's stay. The Discharge Summary must ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the failed to provide a recapitulation of the resident's stay. The Discharge Summary must have a discharge summary that includes, but is not limited to, the following: a recapitulation of the resident's stay that includes, but is not limited to, diagnoses, course of illness/treatment or therapy, and pertinent lab, radiology, and consultation results for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #66) reviewed for a discharge summary, in that: The Discharge Summary for Resident #66 did not include a facility discharge summary that included a complete recapitulation of the resident's stay. This deficient practice could place residents discharged from the facility at risk for incorrect, incomplete, or misleading information recorded regarding discharged or deceased residents. The Findings were: Record review of Resident #66's admission Face Sheet, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility [DATE] and discharged [DATE] with the diagnoses which included dementia with behavioral disturbance (A group of symptoms that affects memory, thinking and interferes with daily life), high blood pressure (long-term force of the blood against your artery walls is high enough that it may eventually cause health problems, such as heart disease), depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), hypothyroidism (A condition resulting from decreased production of thyroid hormones) anxiety (the mind and body's reaction to stressful, dangerous, or unfamiliar situations), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a common, preventable and treatable disease that is characterized by persistent respiratory symptoms like progressive breathlessness and cough), Parkinson's disease (a chronic and progressive movement disorder that initially causes tremor in one hand, stiffness or slowing of movement). Record review of Resident #66's closed record revealed there was a facility discharge summary but, did not include a complete recapitulation of the residents stay at the facility. During an interview on [DATE] at 5:30 p.m. with the ADON revealed she did the Discharge Summaries and stated she did not understand about the recapitulation on the Discharge Summary. The ADON further stated she was not taught to do a recapitulation. Record review of the facility's Discharge Summary Policy, Closure of a Medical Record: Discharge OP5 0501.05, undated, revealed, When all areas are completed, conduct a final review of the discharged record contents to ensure accurate and complete documentation .
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and records review, the facility failed to maintain an infection control Program designed to pr...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and records review, the facility failed to maintain an infection control Program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of disease and infection for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #18) reviewed for infection control, in that: RN A changed gloves three times during wound care with no hand hygiene between glove changes. This deficient practice could place residents at risk for infections and cross contamination. The findings were: Record review of Resident #18's admission record, dated 6/23/22, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder, Dementia with Behavioral Disturbance, Anxiety disorder, Hypothyroidism, and Abnormal Weight Loss. Observation on 06/23/22 at 9:37 a.m. with RN A provided wound care to Resident's #18's unstageable pressure ulcer to the left hip. RN A with clean gloves on removed the dirty bandage from the resident, removed gloves, no hand hygiene performed, donned new gloves, cleansed the wound site with saline, removed gloves, no hand hygiene performed, donned new gloves, wiped the wound area with sure prep pad, removed gloves, no hand hygiene performed, donned new gloves, applied new bandage, and dated tag. RN A changed gloves 3 times during wound care with no hand hygiene in between glove changes. During an interview on 06/23/22 at 9:53 a.m. with RN A confirmed she did not sanitize between glove changes, but she should be. RN A stated, I do not bring hand sanitizer on F hallway because they are all dementia residents. During an interview on 06/24/22 at 2:25 p.m. with the Administrator revealed facility expectations were to perform hand hygiene prior to care, after every glove change, after touching residents, between resident interactions. The Administrator stated they used to have an Alzheimer's unit, but they began to inform staff it would be dissolved months before in August of 2021. The Administrator stated there was no in-service that said not to bring hand sanitizer to the F hallway. The Administrator stated staff could access had sanitizer at any time and when providing care on the F hallway, and staff should follow the same guidelines just like on any hall. During an interview on 06//24/22 at 3:04 p.m. with DON revealed there are no hallways that are prohibited from having hand sanitizer. The DON stated staff was expected to perform hand hygiene before, during, and after glove changes. The DON stated staff should bring a small bottle of hand sanitizer in to the residents' room during care. The DON confirmed they have had many in-services to provide education on infection control. The DON confirmed residents could be at risk of infection if staff does not properly perform hand hygiene. Record review of the facility's policy titled, Clean Dressing Change, dated 12/2021, revealed, 2. Perform hand hygiene and put on gloves .6. Remove soiled dressing. 7. Remove/dispose of gloves, perform hand hygiene, don clean gloves . Record review of the facility's policy titled, Hand Hygiene, undated, revealed, B. Indication for Hand Hygiene Using Alcohol-based Hand Sanitizer include .7. Before donning gloves. 8. After removing gloves .
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0921)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public for 1 of 1 designated s...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public for 1 of 1 designated smoking areas in that: The metal trash cans in the resident designated smoking area contained paper trash as well as used and discarded cigarette ends. This deficient practice could place residents at risk for injury and at risk for burns due to a fire hazard. The findings were: During an observation on 06/23/22 at 11:23 a.m., a red metal trash can, designated for used and discarded cigarette ends in the designated resident smoking area has a used and discarded paper towel and a used and discarded cigarette end inside. During an interview on 06/23/22 at 12:19 a.m., this surveyor accompanied the Administrator to the designated resident smoking area. The Administrator stated the metal red trash can was for cigarette ends only and the metal white trash can was for trash only. This surveyor lifted the lid to the red trash can and revealed the used paper towel and cigarette end. The Administrator stated the paper towel should not be in there and could cause a fire and potential harm to the residents. Record review of the facility's policy titled, Safe Smoking/Tobacco Use Policy, dated 11/2017, revealed, .designated locations .should be outfitted with required safety equipment including .e. Sealed, fire-safe metal containers with self-closing covers for the disposal of ashes and other smoking products .
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0584)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 65 of 65 residents whose environment was reviewed for homelike setting in th...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 65 of 65 residents whose environment was reviewed for homelike setting in that: 1. The entry way of the facility had four couches that appeared dirty, damaged and dated during the four day survey. 2. There was a broken industrial dishwasher was stored in the main resident dining area during the first three days of the survey. 3. Wheelchairs, a walker and an IV pole were stored in the extended dining area also used by residents during lunch during three days of the survey. These deficient practices could diminish quality of life for resident's self worth and self esteem for the residents. The findings were: Observation on 6/21/2022 at 9:45 a.m. of 4 of 4 couches revealed the following: one couch appeared orange in color and was institutional in presentation; another couch was brown with several areas that were cut or appeared to be torn as well as worn, (the white stuffing was protruding through the brown exterior couch material). Two other sofas were dated in a floral print and appeared to have numerous uncountable stains on the arm cushions, seating areas and backs. The couches remained in the facility in the same locations and appearance throughout the survey. Observation on 6/22/2022 at 10:15 a.m. of the dining area and extended dining area revealed there was one broken industrial dishwasher stored in the resident dining area. Observation on 6:22/2022 at 10:20 a.m. revealed there were four wheelchairs, a walker, and an IV pole not in use by residents being stored in the extended resident dining area, also identified as the former resident chapel. During an interview on 6/22/2022 at 10:45 a.m. with Resident #35, during resident council, revealed the resident did not want family to have to sit on any of the couches in the entry way and described the coaches as, nasty. During an interview on 6/23/2022 at 12:45 p.m. with the DON revealed maintenance was responsible for the current location of the broken dishwasher. The DON was note sure of exactly how long the dishwasher had been in the resident dining area and went on to say it was placed in the resident dining area several weeks ago after a new dishwasher was installed in the facility kitchen. The DON did not know why the unassigned four wheelchairs, the walker or the IV stand were in the extended dining area. The DON stated during a previous COVID outbreak the area was used for equipment storage, however those items should not be stored in that area where residents eat during meal times. The DON did say the couches in the entry way showed signs of wear and stains from resident use. During an interview on 6/23/2022 at 12:57 p.m. with Maintenance Director revealed the broken dishwasher, was stored in the resident dining area for a month. The Maintenance Director confirmed the broken dishwasher, the four wheelchairs, the walker, nor the IV pole should not be stored in the resident dining areas. The Maintenance Director stated the items belonged to the facility and were not assigned to specific residents. The Maintenance Director also stated there was enough room in the outside storage for all the items to be stored. The Maintenance Director stated although the couches were not his responsibility, they did look old and could have been cleaner. During an interview on 6/23/2022 at 6:00 p.m. the Administrator did not provide a reason for the broken dishwasher or the four wheelchairs, the walker and the IV stand being stored in the resident dining areas. The Administrator stated the facility was looking into purchasing new furniture, as the current furniture was identified as needing to be replaced in the facility's, mock survey, several months ago. The Administrator did not provide and documentation showing an order had been placed for any new entry way furniture prior to the beginning of the survey. No information was provided for dates of the new dishwasher installation nor was a policy on facility storage prior to exit.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure expired medications were properly stored for 1 of 1 medication rooms observed. The facility failed to ensure expired ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure expired medications were properly stored for 1 of 1 medication rooms observed. The facility failed to ensure expired medications were removed from the medication room. This failure could place residents at risk for harm due to ineffectiveness of medications. The findings include: Observation and interview on 06/23/22 at 4:19 P.M. with RN C revealed there was a bottle of Zinc on the shelf in the medication room, with an expiration date of 2/22. Further observation revealed there were various expired tubes for specimen collection being stored in drawers and in plastic storage containers for use, and hundreds of lavender top tubes, grey top tubes, yellow top tubes, red top tubes with expiration dates in 2021 and 4/2022. RN C stated the facility rarely collected their own specimens, and an outside company was currently used for specimen collection. RN C stated most of the tubes were from during COVID and it was the ADONs responsibility to discard the expired items in the medication room. During an interview with the ADON on 06/23/22 at 6:03 p.m., the ADON stated some of her duties included maintaining the pharmacy book, ordering supplies, stocking the medication room. The ADON stated it was a shared responsibility between her, the medication aides, and the unit manager LVN D to check for expired products. The ADON stated the facility contracted with a company who came on Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Saturdays to do any specimen collection needed. If the facility needed a stat lab, they would send the resident to the hospital. The ADON stated she personally had never used the specimen collection tubes but the company the facility contracted with may use them if they were out of something and needed it. The ADON stated she did not know what could happen if a specimen was collected in an expired tube. The ADON stated residents should not be receiving expired medication and the negative outcome for a resident receiving expired medication would be based on the medication. During an interview with the Administrator on 06/23/22 at 4:31 P.M., this surveyor gave the Administrator some of the expired tubes and bottle of expired Zinc. The Administrator stated it was a shared responsibility of everyone to look for expired products in the medication room. During an interview on 06/24/22 at 2:33 P.M. with the Administrator stated the bottle of expired Zinc should not be in the medication room. The Administrator stated nurses should check for expiration dates before giving medication. The Administrator stated she does not know if they have a log or check list for inventory that they keep up with. The Administrator stated she had no idea what consequence this could have for the resident and did not further elaborate. During an interview on 06/24/22 at 3:17 P.M. with the DON revealed every charge nurse and the medication aide oversees the medications in the med storage room. The DON stated if something was expired it should be discarded and expired tubes should be returned to the contract company that brought the supplies. The DON stated there was a reason for the dates and some adverse effect could occur if a resident received expired medication or inaccurate labs could result from using expired tubes. Record review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Management, dated 08/2012, revealed, Medications are stored, dispensed, and destroyed in a manner to ensure safety and conformance with State and Federal laws .
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for k...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation, in that: 1. A blender used to puree foods had cracks, cuts, and a broken piece in it while being used to prepare prescribed puree diets at the lunch time meal. 2. Visible dust was observed falling onto the meal preparation area from overhead ceiling pipes. These deficient practices could place residents who received meals from the main kitchen at risk for food borne illness. The findings were: 1. Observation on 6/23/2022 at 11:15 a.m. with the Cook, revealed bread crumbs were coming out of the top side of the blender during meal preparation. During an interview with the [NAME] on 6/23/2022 at 11:17 a.m. the [NAME] stated the blender should not have cracks. The [NAME] stated, while pointing into the blender approximately midway, those little slivers of plastic could break and drop into the food we are making, and went on to describe bacteria getting in, there, and stated that would not be good for the residents. The [NAME] also stated she had already been told by the DM they were getting a new blender but did not know when. During an interview with the DM and [NAME] on 6/23/2022 at 12:13 p.m., while the [NAME] was standing behind the steam table serving resident plates, the [NAME] was asked if the puree food was the food prepared in the damaged blender, the [NAME] said, yes. The [NAME] was asked if she was going to serve the food prepared in the damaged blender to the residents and she stated, yes. The DM then spoke up and stated the the food prepared in the damaged blender should not be and further stated, it is not good for the residents, it had cracks in it. During an interview with the Administrator on 6/23/2022 at 6:00 p.m., the Administrator stated she was not made aware the kitchen need a new blender before today. The Administrator stated she did not see the blender so she would not be able to answer how it could affect residents in the facility. 2. After the initial observation in the kitchen and subsequent observations there continued to be large amounts of visible dust on the pipes that ran along and across the ceiling of the kitchen on 6/21/2022, 6/22/2022, and 6/23/2022. During an interview with the DM on 6/23/2022 at 12:22 p.m. the DM acknowledged she could see dust on the pipes in the kitchen, she did not know how long the pipes had been dusty. The DM said the dust should not be there and stated it could get into the residents' food. During an interview with the Maintenance Director on 6/23/2022 1:05 p.m., the Maintenance Director stated cleaning the dust off of the pipes in the kitchen was his responsibility. The Maintenance Director further stated cleaning the dust off of the pipes in the kitchen would have to be completed at night and he had not yet completed that task. During an interview with the Administrator on 6/23/2022 at 6:00 p.m., the Administrator stated the kitchen pipes had been dusted the night before by the Maintenance Director. When this surveyor showed the Administrator the dust which had dropped down from the pipes while in the kitchen the Administrator did not have a reply other than she was told the Maintenance Director had dusted them. No policy pertaining to kitchen blenders or kitchen dusting was provided prior to exit.
MINOR (C)

Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact

Staffing Information (Tag F0732)

Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to post the nurse staffing data in a prominent place readily accessible to residents and visitors for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for posted nursin...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to post the nurse staffing data in a prominent place readily accessible to residents and visitors for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for posted nursing data, in that: The facility's nurse staffing information was not posted in a prominent place readily accessible to residents and visitors. This failure could place residents, their families, and facility visitors at risk of not having access to information regarding staffing data and facility census. The findings were: During an interview on 06/24/2022 at 3:20 p.m. with the Director of Nurses revealed the Daily Postings for Staff is posted on one of the 4 pillars at the nurse's station. Observation on 06/24/2022 at 3:28 p.m., with the DON, revealed the Daily Postings for Staff was posted on the left side of the front pillar on the right. Further observation revealed a flag was hanging on the front of the pillar and was blocking the Daily Postings for Staff. During an interview with the DON on 06/24/2022 at 3:40 p.m., the DON revealed the location of the Daily Postings for Staff was not prominently placed so residents, relatives and visitors could see the staffing for the shift. The facility Policy and Procedure for Daily Posting of Staff was requested from the Director of Nurses but, was not provided.
MINOR (C)

Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact

Deficiency F0912 (Tag F0912)

Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents

Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide a minimum of 80 square feet per resident in 37 of 41 resident rooms (A2 through A8, A10, B3 through B11, C2 through C5, C7, C9, C10,...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide a minimum of 80 square feet per resident in 37 of 41 resident rooms (A2 through A8, A10, B3 through B11, C2 through C5, C7, C9, C10, D2 through D7, E3 through E8, and F2 through F8) reviewed for minimum for square footage per resident, in that: Resident rooms A2 through A8, A10, B3 through B11, C2 through C5, C7, C9, C10, D2 through D7, E3 through E8, and F2 through F8 did not have a minimum of 80 square feet per resident. This deficient practice could affect residents residing in rooms due to the reduced living space for the residents and could pose problems in the residents' activities of daily living. The findings were: During an interview with the Administrator on 6/25/19 at 9:00 a.m., the Administrator revealed she would be requesting a room waiver on the same rooms from last year which did not provide residents with 80 square feet of floor space. The Administrator stated none of the rooms had been modified in any way and the rooms remained at the same measurements which were as follows: Resident rooms A2, A3, A5 through A8, and A10 measured 13 feet 7 inches by 11 feet 5 inches which provided 157.55 square feet of floor space. Dividing the 157.55 square feet of usable floor space by 2 resulted in 78.77 square feet of floor space per resident in these rooms. Room A4 measured 13 feet 6 inches by 11 feet 7 inches which provided 159.12 square feet of usable floor space. Dividing the 159.12 square feet of usable floor space by 2 resulted in 79.56 square feet of floor space per resident in this room. Room B3 measured 13 feet 6 inches by 11 feet 10 inches which provided 150.96 square feet of floor space. Dividing the 150.96 square feet of usable floor space by 2 resulted in 75.48 square feet of floor space per resident in this room. Rooms B4 through B6, B8 through B11, C7, C9, D4, E4, E7 and E8 measured 13 feet 6 inches by 11 feet 5 inches which provided 156.4 square feet of floor space. Dividing the 156.4 square feet of usable floor space by 2 resulted in 78.2 square feet of floor space per resident in these rooms. Room B7, C4, D3, and F7 measured 13 feet 6 inches by 11 feet 6 inches which provided 157.76 square feet of floor space. Dividing the 157.76 square feet of usable floor space by 2 resulted in 78.88 square feet of floor space per resident in these rooms. Room C2, C3, and C5 measured 13 feet 5 inches by 11 feet 5 inches which provided 155.25 square feet of floor space. Dividing the 155.25 square feet of usable floor space by 2 resulted in 77.63 square feet of floor space per resident in these rooms. Room C10, E5, F2, F3, F5, F6. and F8 measured 13 feet 7 inches by 11 feet 5 inches which provided 158.92 square feet of floor space. Dividing the 158.92 square feet of usable floor space by 2 resulted in 79.46 square feet of floor space per resident in these rooms. Room D2, D5 through D7, E3. and E6 measured 13 feet 7 inches by 11 feet 6 inches which provided 157.55 square feet of floor space. Dividing the 157.55 square feet of usable floor space by 2 resulted in 78.77 square feet of floor space per resident in these rooms. Room F4 measured 13 feet 4 inches by 11 feet 4 inches which provided 152.76 square feet of floor space. Dividing the 152.76 square feet of usable floor space by 2 resulted in 76.38 square feet of floor space per resident in this room. Record review of Form 3740, Bed Classifications, signed by the facility Administrator on 6/24/2022 revealed that all resident rooms were double occupancy.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: 3 life-threatening violation(s), Payment denial on record. Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 35 deficiencies on record, including 3 critical (life-threatening) violations. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
  • • $24,653 in fines. Higher than 94% of Texas facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
  • • Grade F (22/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: This facility has 3 Immediate Jeopardy findings. Serious concerns require careful evaluation.

About This Facility

What is Pleasanton South Nursing And Rehabilitation's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns PLEASANTON SOUTH NURSING AND REHABILITATION an overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars, which is considered average nationally. Within Texas, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This mid-range rating indicates the facility meets federal standards but may have areas for improvement.

How is Pleasanton South Nursing And Rehabilitation Staffed?

CMS rates PLEASANTON SOUTH NURSING AND REHABILITATION's staffing level at 2 out of 5 stars, which is below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 52%, compared to the Texas average of 46%.

What Have Inspectors Found at Pleasanton South Nursing And Rehabilitation?

State health inspectors documented 35 deficiencies at PLEASANTON SOUTH NURSING AND REHABILITATION during 2022 to 2025. These included: 3 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death), 27 with potential for harm, and 5 minor or isolated issues. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.

Who Owns and Operates Pleasanton South Nursing And Rehabilitation?

PLEASANTON SOUTH NURSING AND REHABILITATION is owned by a government entity. Government-operated facilities are typically run by state, county, or municipal agencies. The facility is operated by EDURO HEALTHCARE, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 88 certified beds and approximately 64 residents (about 73% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in PLEASANTON, Texas.

How Does Pleasanton South Nursing And Rehabilitation Compare to Other Texas Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Texas, PLEASANTON SOUTH NURSING AND REHABILITATION's overall rating (3 stars) is above the state average of 2.8, staff turnover (52%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (3 stars) is at the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Pleasanton South Nursing And Rehabilitation?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations and the below-average staffing rating.

Is Pleasanton South Nursing And Rehabilitation Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, PLEASANTON SOUTH NURSING AND REHABILITATION has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 3 Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 3-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Texas. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.

Do Nurses at Pleasanton South Nursing And Rehabilitation Stick Around?

PLEASANTON SOUTH NURSING AND REHABILITATION has a staff turnover rate of 52%, which is 6 percentage points above the Texas average of 46%. Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.

Was Pleasanton South Nursing And Rehabilitation Ever Fined?

PLEASANTON SOUTH NURSING AND REHABILITATION has been fined $24,653 across 2 penalty actions. This is below the Texas average of $33,325. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.

Is Pleasanton South Nursing And Rehabilitation on Any Federal Watch List?

PLEASANTON SOUTH NURSING AND REHABILITATION is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.