WOODWAY REHABILITATION AND HEALTHCARE CENTER

7801 WOODWAY DR, WACO, TX 76712 (254) 235-7801
For profit - Corporation 144 Beds MOMENTUM SKILLED SERVICES Data: November 2025 5 Immediate Jeopardy citations
Trust Grade
0/100
#1160 of 1168 in TX
Last Inspection: June 2025

Inspected within the last 6 months. Data reflects current conditions.

Overview

Woodway Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating poor performance with significant concerns about care quality and safety. They rank #1160 out of 1168 nursing homes in Texas, placing them in the bottom half of facilities statewide, and #15 out of 17 in McLennan County, suggesting limited local options. The facility is worsening, with issues increasing from 3 in 2024 to 8 in 2025. Staffing is a concern, as they have less RN coverage than 89% of Texas facilities, despite a low turnover rate of 0%. Additionally, they have incurred $18,259 in fines, which is average for the state but still raises concerns about compliance. Specific incidents highlighted include a failure to administer health shakes properly to a non-responsive resident, which could have led to serious health risks, and an incident of physical abuse between residents that was not adequately addressed, putting residents at risk for harm. While the facility has some strengths, such as low staff turnover, the overall picture shows significant weaknesses in care and safety that families should carefully consider.

Trust Score
F
0/100
In Texas
#1160/1168
Bottom 1%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Getting Worse
3 → 8 violations
Staff Stability
○ Average
Turnover data not reported for this facility.
Penalties
○ Average
$18,259 in fines. Higher than 58% of Texas facilities. Some compliance issues.
Skilled Nurses
⚠ Watch
Each resident gets only 14 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Texas. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
Violations
⚠ Watch
15 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Overall Rating
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Staff Levels
★★★☆☆
3.0
Care Quality
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2024: 3 issues
2025: 8 issues

The Good

  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in fire safety.

The Bad

1-Star Overall Rating

Below Texas average (2.8)

Significant quality concerns identified by CMS

Federal Fines: $18,259

Below median ($33,413)

Minor penalties assessed

Chain: MOMENTUM SKILLED SERVICES

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

The Ugly 15 deficiencies on record

5 life-threatening
Jun 2025 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pharmacy Services (Tag F0755)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administe...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals, to meet the needs of each resident for 1of 2 medication storage rooms (Nurse's Station Room). The facility failed on 6/4/25 to ensure that expired lab testing supplies were removed from 1 of 2 medication storage rooms (Nurse's Station Room). This failure could place residents at risk for misdiagnosis from expired and possibly ineffective lab testing supplies. Use of these expired supplies would not meet acceptable standards of medical practice and could cause a resident to receive an incorrect treatment, which would allow their medical condition to worsen. Findings included: Observation on 6/4/25 at 3:55 PM of the Medication Storage Room located by the nurse's station revealed the following: 3 Lab swabs expired 2/9/2023. 4 Gray lab tubes expired 4/30/2023. 1 Gold lab tube expired 12/31/2023. 5 Lab swabs expired 7/1/2024. 3 Red tubes expired 9/19/2024. 6 Culture swabs expired 1/12/2025. In an interview on 6/5/25 at 1:20 PM, LVN-A stated the policy on expired medications and expired lab supplies was to pull them from stock, log them and destroy them. She stated the facility's contracted lab usually brings their own supplies. She stated MA's, nurses, and unit managers (including herself) were responsible for checking the medication rooms for expired items. She stated the negative outcome to residents if expired items were used (example lab tubes/cultures) was the expired cultures could cause inaccurate lab results. In an interview on 6/5/25 at 1:30 PM, MA-A stated the policy on expired lab supplies was to toss them in the trash if they didn't have needles. If they had needles, they were disposed of in the sharp's container. She stated MA's and nurses were responsible for checking the medication rooms for expired items and the negative outcome to residents if expired items were used (example lab tubes/cultures) was they could give false readings/results on their test. In an interview on 6/5/25 at 1:40 PM, the DON stated the policy on expired medications and expired lab supplies was to not use them. She stated expired lab supplies were given to the lab to dispose of properly. She stated the MA, ADON and herself were responsible for checking the medication rooms. She stated the negative outcome to residents if expired items were used (example lab tubes/cultures) could be false lab results on their test. In an interview on 6/5/25 at 1:56 PM, the ADM stated the policy on expired medications and expired lab supplies was to dispose of them. He stated nursing staff was responsible for checking the medication rooms for expired supplies. He stated the negative outcome to residents if expired items were used (example lab tubes/cultures) could be inconsistent test results. Record review of the facility policy titled Medication Storage with a date of 5/2023, reflected that all medication rooms were to be routinely inspected by the pharmacist for discontinued or outdated medications and they were to be destroyed.
Mar 2025 3 deficiencies 2 IJ
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in a...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices reviewed for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed for quality of care. The facility nurses failed to hold Resident #1s health shakes and administered them through a 60ML syringe by mouth while she was not responsive on 3/10/25 at 10:20pm and 3/11/25 at 12:10pm. These failures resulted in an identification of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) On 3/12/2025 at 4:35 p.m. While the IJ was removed on 3/14/25, the facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of no actual harm with the potential for more than minimal harm that was not immediate jeopardy with a scope identified as isolated due to the facility's need to complete in-service training and evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems. These failures placed residents who have had a decline or change in condition at risk for aspiration, choking, and death. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's undated face sheet reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of Alzheimer Disease (A brain disorder that slowly destroys a person's memory), Dementia (the loss of cognitive function, remembering, thinking, and reasoning), Hypertension (elevated blood pressure), Bradycardia (a slow heart rate). Record review of Resident #1's Significant change in status MDS dated [DATE] reflected she Had a BIMS score of 00 indicating she had severe cognitive impaired. Resident #1 required substantial/maximal assistance indicating the helper does more than half the effort or the helper lifts or holds trunk or limbs and provides more than half the effort for ADL care showering, upper and lower body dressing, and toileting hygiene. The MDS reflected Resident #1 required set up or clean up assistance with eating and was receiving hospice services. Record review of Resident #1's care plan dated 02/06/2025 reflected a significant/Un-expected weight loss due to decline in overall health and decline in oral intake. Goal: Will receive adequate nutrition and fluid intake and weight will stabilize through the next review. Interventions included Provide supplements as ordered. Provide/offer hydration throughout the day. Serve diet as ordered and offer substitution if intake less than 50%. Record review of Resident #1s progress notes dated 3/10/25 at 10:20pm reflected Resident was able to consume 180ml of Ensure (health shake) via syringe. No signs or symptoms of chocking noted. Head of bed up right. No signs and symptoms of pain or distress noted. Resident Family Member notified of residents' intake of Ensure. Call light within reach. Care needs met. Signed by LVN C. Record review of Resident #1s' Physician orders for March 2025 reflected an order for a fortified diet, mechanical soft ground meats dated 01/02/2025 and health shakes or equivalent three times a day dated 02/23/2025. The physicians' orders also reflected that Resident #1 was admitted to Hospice services on 01/20/2025. Resident #1 had an order for a stat (without delay) chest x-ray to rule our aspiration dated 03/11/2025. Record review of Resident #1s Chest X ray ordered for Resident #1 on 3/11/25 at 5:59pm reflected there was no aspiration seen. In an observation completed on 3/11/25 at 11:00am Resident #1was fidgeting with her fingers in the air, unresponsive to verbal stimuli. The head of her bead was elevated 45 degrees, she had her mouth open, and head leaned back looking upward to the ceiling. There was a bottle of health shake with a straw in it next to a 60cc syringe in a clear package on the bedside table. In a second observation and interview of Resident #1 and CNA A on 3/11/25 at 12:10 when Resident #1 appeared in the same position. At 12:13pm CNA A entered the room as this surveyor was inquiring about Resident #1s lunch tray. CNA A stated Resident #1 was too weak to eat. She stated the Resident #1 had not been offered a food tray. CNA A was putting on gloves and drawing up a 60cc syringe full of health shake. As CNA A was talking with the surveyor, she then proceeded over to the Resident #1 and placed the syringe in the resident's mouth. This surveyor asked CNA A to stop at that time. CNA A Stated she worked with agency and today was her first day in the facility. She stated there was an orientation on the agency app prior to taking a shift at the facility, she did not know if feeding was part of that orientation. CNA A Stated Resident #1 did not have the strength to eat and that she was told in report (employee to employee review of residents' conditions) this morning by the night nurse to feed and give fluids to Resident #1 with the syringe so she would not be dehydrated. CNA A stated she had given Resident #1 two full 60 cc syringes of health shake this morning. She stated she had not been instructed by the building DON or ADON to feed or give fluids to a resident with a syringe. In an interview on 3/11/25 at 12:20pm the DON stated Resident #1 had been unresponsive for about 2-3 days. The DON stated it was not normal practice to feed or give fluids to residents with a syringe. She stated The Family Member was insistent with hospice that it could be done. The DON stated the CNAs have not been trained to feed or give fluids using a syringe unless the hospice nurse instructed them to do so. She stated Resident #1 could get aspiration pneumonia (an infection that is the results of food or fluids going into the lungs instead of the stomach). The DON stated feeding residents with a syringe is not facility protocol. She stated the 60cc syringe came from Hospice. In an interview on 3/11/25 at 1:02pm LVN B stated she had worked at the facility for 3 days and she was the charge nurse for Resident #1. She stated she was aware Resident #1 was on hospice for a cardiac condition and Resident #1 had a hip injury that was nonoperational. She stated Resident #1s family was upset she was not eating, and she had talked to the family about reasons including end of life. She stated she also explained to the family that she could aspirate (a condition where the fluid goes into the lung) if she was not swallowing. LVN B stated at no time did CNA A report that the night nurse had instructed her to feed or give fluids to Resident #1 with a syringe. She stated it also was not passed along in their nursing report from the night nurse. She stated the Resident #1 was unresponsive this morning. LVN B stated feeding or giving fluids through a syringe to a resident who was not responsive could lead to the resident aspirating. LVN B stated she did an assessment on Resident #1, and her lungs were clear (free from abnormal sounds of respirations). LVN B stated a Chest x ray was ordered by the physician, and the facility was waiting on that to be completed. Attempted to contact LVN C who works night shift (6pm -6am) on 3/10/25 on 3/11/25 at 1:42 pm with no answer. In an interview with a Family Member of Resident #1 on 3/11/25 at 2:51 stated when she had mentioned giving Resident #1 fluids through a syringe, she was not talking about a large syringe full of fluids. She stated she was asking for the staff to give her drips out of a small syringe. She stated something to keep Resident #1's mouth moist. She stated she did not ask for them to force feed her. She stated she just wanted Resident #1s mouth moist, not as dry; she wanted her to have oral care, swab her mouth out, not force feed her though a syringe. In an interview on 3/11/25 at 3:00 pm with The Medical Director and Primary Care Physician for Resident #1 stated it was not recommend feeding or give fluids by mouth a resident with a syringe. He stated he was over the Resident#1s hospice company as well and he had called hospice, and they had no recommendations for feeding or giving fluids through a syringe either. He stated if a person were to squirt a bunch of thin liquids at one time into Resident#1s mouth she would aspirate, causing choking, and pneumonia. He stated the resident was not eating. He stated he did listen to Resident #1s lungs, and they sounded clear and did not see any harm from the resident receiving the thin liquids per the syringe. He stated he did instruct the nursing staff not to feed or give fluids to her through the syringe. He stated he ordered routine oral care to be completed to ensure the residents mouth was moist. In an interview on 3/11/25 at 3:46 pm RN D Resident #1's hospice nurse stated hospice did not recommend feeding or giving fluids to Resident #1 with a syringe. He stated The Family Member had called him and was upset that the facility would not feed Resident #1 with a syringe. He stated he educated the family on risk of feeding and giving fluids with a syringe. He stated that he instructed the family that hospice would not feed or give fluids to Resident #1 with a syringe. He stated there was never an order to do that. The Family Member stated the night nurse told her that she got her to take a half of a bottle of health shake and she did not elaborate how she got her to take the fluid. He stated he had instructed the family on the death and dying process and that it was a traumatic event such as a hip fracture that causing the resident to further decline and that not having an appetite and not eating was part of that decline. He stated the resident has not been responsive the last 3-4 days. In an interview with the DON and ADM on 3/12/25 at 3:09 when the DON stated there was never any formal training to feed or give residents any fluids through a syringe because it was not the facility practice to do so. She stated here was never any order for food or fluids to be given through a syringe because that it not the facility practice. The DON stated agency staff were aware of the Residents#1s plan or care through verbal report. She stated the agency staff were also given a point click care password so they could access the plan or care and be aware of resident's needs. The DON stated there was a book with specific instructions at the nurses' station on how to navigate point click care and facility policy and procedures provided to agency staff. She stated they encourage agency staff to ask questions if needed. Record review of facility policy titled Competency Evaluation dated 04/2024 and revised 01/2025 reflected: It is the policy of this facility to evaluate each employee to assure they meet appropriate competencies and skills for performing their job. An Immediate Jeopardy was identified on 3/12/2025 at 4:35 p.m. and an IJ template was provided to the ADM and DON. The following Plan of Removal submitted by the facility was accepted on 03/13/2025 at 10:28 a.m. PLAN OF REMOVAL Problem: The facility failed to ensure that all nursing staff possess the competencies and skill sets necessary to provide nursing and related services to meet the residents' needs safely and in a manner that promotes each resident's rights, physical, mental, and psychological well-being. An audit was completed by nurse management to ensure no other residents were at risk. Resident #1 had a chest x-ray completed on 3/11/25 that showed no aspiration. Resident # 1 was assessed by the DON & the facility medical director. Resident #1 remains in the facility in stable condition. Immediate action: 11. As soon as the DON was made aware of the situation on 3/11/25 she immediately removed the syringe from the resident's room. 12. CNA #1 was given a one-on-one education by ADON on 3/11/25 that a resident should never be syringe fed. Our investigation revealed that an overnight nurse instructed the CNA to administer the resident ensure through a syringe. A telephone call was placed to the night nurse & a message left for her to call the facility. The night nurse had not returned our phone call. A message was left that she could not return to the facility until she spoke with the DON. 13. DON started In-servicing facility & agency licensed nurses & CNAS on 3/11/25 at 1300 that residents were never to fed via a syringe. All 6-2 & 2-10 nursing staff on duty were educated. In-services for facility licensed nurses & CNAS will be completed on 3/13/25. Any agency staff that has not previously been in-serviced will be required to complete the in-services prior to starting their shift. 14. DON/ADON started In-servicing on 3/12/25 with agency staff to ensure they were educated on where to find the residents plan of care. 15. DON/ADON started In-servicing on 3/12/25 with all CNAs both facility & agency on the importance of not attempting to feed a resident that is unresponsive. Any new facility or agency CNA will be provided the education prior to working. 16. The agency binder was reviewed to ensure that agency staff know where to look to review the residents plan of care. Interventions 17. Any new agency staff will be in-serviced by nurse management on how to find the residents plan of care prior to starting their shift. The education started on 3/12/25 & will be ongoing when new facility or agency staff are scheduled. 18. Shift Key will download the process of where to find the residents plan of care prior to accepting a shift. The ADON will be responsible for the communication to Shift Key. 19. Nurse management will review the residents' care plan to ensure that it reflects the resident's needs. The care plan review will be completed by 3/14/25. 20. When a resident experiences a change of condition the care plan will be updated to reflect the resident's current needs. The DON/ADON/ Unit Manager will be responsible for updating resident care plan when a change of condition is identified. Ongoing Projected completion 3/13/25 for facility nursing staff. Care Plan review will be completed by 3/14/25. Any staff member who was not present during initial in-servicing/training will not be allowed to assume their duties until in-service was completed. The DON/ADON/WC NURSE will complete Ongoing In-service/or weekend nurse supervisor, until all staff, weekend, prn, and agency staff in completed. Monitoring 5. Nurse management will question random CNAs 3 X's a week to ensure they understand Resident #1s plan of care. Nurse management will perform random questions 3 X's a week for 6 weeks. 6. Staff will complete a questionnaire related to providing care that reflects the resident's needs. 7. On 3/13/25 The DON/designee began a questionnaire to validate the effectiveness of the training. The questionnaire is conducted with facility staff. Immediate re-education will be completed by the DON/designee if any staff is unable to answer appropriately to the questions on the questionnaire. Staff will not be allowed to work until after completion of the questionnaire. Projected completion 3/14/25. 8. On 3/12/25 An impromptu QAPI meeting was conducted with the facility's Medical Director to notify of the potential for non-compliance and the action plan implemented for approval. 3/13/25 Surveyor Monitoring included the following: 10. Observation completed on 3/13/25 at 12:50PM reflected there was no longer a syringe for feeding In Resident #1s room. 11. Record review of Momentum Skilled Services 1:1 in service dated 3/11/25 signed by CNA#1 reflected that CNA A was given a one-on-one education by The ADON that read a resident should never be syringe fed. 12. Record review of Inservice dated 03/11/25 and 03/12/25 provided to licensed nurses and certified nurse aides reflected they had been educated by The DON that no residents would be fed or given fluids orally with a syringe for any reason. 13. Record review of facility in-service provided to agency staff working within the building dated 3/12/25 reflected that the residents plan of care was in the EMR (electronic medical record) under the [NAME] tab (a tab that contains certain needs for residents that staff may review). If they were to have any questions after reading the residents plan of care they must find their charge nurse for clarification. 14. Record review of facility in-service dated 03/12/25 provided to all certified nursing assistance both agency and facility staff reflected staff members must never attempt to feed or give fluids to a resident that was unresponsive. If they had a resident that was unresponsive, they must find the charge nurse for clarification. 15. The DON reviewed the agency binder to ensure the agency staff would be able to locate the residents plan of care to provide services. 16. Interviewed 22 nursing staff (CNA D, E,F,G,H,I,J,K,L,M,N,O,P,Q and LVN R,S,T,U,V,W,X) from all shifts and they stated they had been educated on not syringe feeding residents. They stated they had been educated on not attempting to feed unresponsive residents. They stated the risk for resident would be aspiration or choking. They stated they had been educated on where and how to locate a resident's plan of care to provide and meet the resident's needs. The agency staff were able to locate the facility binder with their expectations and EMR directions to provide services and care to residents. They stated if a plan of care did not seem accurate for a resident they would go to their charge nurse for clarification. They stated even if a nurse told them to do something that was out of their scope, they would report it to the ADON or DON for further clarification. The agency staff stated they were instructed prior to their shift to review the blue binder at the nurses' station. They stated within the binder there was current in-services for staff, policy and procedures for pain and falls, abuse, and neglect, also directions on how to navigate the electronic medical record to see the residents current plan of care. The binder also included current in-services for staff. Included in in-services within the blue binder were: no resident will be fed by syringe, Staff members must never attempt to feed a resident that is unresponsive, and where the plan of care is located within the EMR. 17. In an interview with The ADON on 3/13/25 at 2:46PM- The ADON stated the facility had posted an automatic notification that must be acknowledged to review in-services prior to the start of agency staffs shift instructing staff they must sign in at the nurses' station and all agency staff must read and abide by the blue binder located at the nurse's station. Within the blue binder was found an emergency phone list, items to report immediately, sign in sheets, facility management contacts. The binder also included current in-services for staff. Included in in-services within the blue binder were: no resident will be fed by syringe, Staff members must never attempt to feed a resident that is unresponsive, and where the plan of care is located within the EMR. Record review of shift key logs reflected the notification of in-services prior to coming on shift had been signed and acknowledged by 6 agency staff working 3/13/25. 18. Record review of a Care Plan Audit on 3/14/25 completed by the DON was 100% completed. The DON stated there were no further negative findings within the Care plan audit for all residents. She stated the care plans were accurate for Residents to reflects the resident's needs. 10. Signed QAPI minutes reviewed for 3/12/25 and reflected a meeting was held that included the facilities ADM, DON, ADON, MDS, and Medical Director The ADM and DON were informed the Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 03/14/2025 at 11:53 a.m. The facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of no actual harm with the potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy and a scope of Isolated due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems that were put into place.
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Deficiency F0726 (Tag F0726)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assure that all nursing staff possess the competencie...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assure that all nursing staff possess the competencies and skill sets necessary to provide nursing and related services to meet the residents' needs safely and in a manner that promotes each resident's rights, physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed. The facility nurses failed to hold Resident #1's health shakes and administered them through a 60 ML syringe by mouth while she was not responsive on 3/10/25 at 10:20pm and 3/11/25 at 12:10pm. These failures resulted in an identification of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) On 3/12/2025 at 4:35 p.m. While the IJ was removed on 3/14/25, the facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of no actual harm with the potential for more than minimal harm that was not immediate jeopardy with a scope identified as isolated due to the facility's need to complete in-service training and evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems. These failures placed residents who have had a decline or change in condition at risk for aspiration, choking, and death. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's undated face sheet reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of Alzheimer Disease (A brain disorder that slowly destroys a person's memory), Dementia (the loss of cognitive function, remembering, thinking, and reasoning), Hypertension (elevated blood pressure), Bradycardia (a slow heart rate). Record review of Resident #1's Significant change in status MDS dated [DATE] reflected she Had a BIMS score of 00 indicating she had severe cognitive impaired. Resident #1 required substantial/maximal assistance indicating the helper does more than half the effort or the helper lifts or holds trunk or limbs and provides more than half the effort for ADL care showering, upper and lower body dressing, and toileting hygiene. The MDS reflected Resident #1 required set up or clean up assistance with eating and was receiving hospice services. Record review of Resident #1's care plan dated 02/06/2025 reflected a significant/Un-expected weight loss due to decline in overall health and decline in oral intake. Goal: Will receive adequate nutrition and fluid intake and weight will stabilize through the next review. Interventions included Provide supplements as ordered. Provide/offer hydration throughout the day. Serve diet as ordered and offer substitution if intake less than 50%. Record review of Resident #1's progress notes dated 3/10/25 at 10:20pm reflected Resident was able to consume 180 ml of Ensure (health shake) via syringe. No signs or symptoms of chocking noted. Head of bed up right. No signs and symptoms of pain or distress noted. Resident Family Member notified of residents' intake of Ensure. Call light within reach. Care needs met. Signed by LVN C. Record review of Resident #1's Physician orders for March 2025 reflected an order for a fortified diet, mechanical soft ground meats dated 01/02/2025 and health shakes or equivalent three times a day dated 02/23/2025. The physicians' orders also reflected that Resident #1 was admitted to Hospice services on 01/20/2025. Resident #1 had an order for a stat (without delay) chest x-ray to rule our aspiration dated 03/11/2025. Record review of Resident #1's Chest X ray ordered for Resident #1 on 3/11/25 at 5:59pm reflected there was no aspiration seen. In an observation completed on 3/11/25 at 11:00am Resident #1 was fidgeting with her fingers in the air, unresponsive to verbal stimuli. The head of her bead was elevated 45 degrees, she had her mouth open, and head leaned back looking upward to the ceiling. There was a bottle of health shake with a straw in it next to a 60 cc syringe in a clear package on the bedside table. In a second observation and interview of Resident #1 and CNA A on 3/11/25 at 12:10 when Resident #1 appeared in the same position. At 12:13pm CNA A entered the room as this surveyor was inquiring about Resident #1's lunch tray. CNA A stated Resident #1 was too weak to eat. She stated the Resident #1 had not been offered a food tray. CNA A was putting on gloves and drawing up a 60 cc syringe full of health shake. As CNA A was talking with the surveyor, she then proceeded over to the Resident #1 and placed the syringe in the resident's mouth. This surveyor asked CNA A to stop at that time. CNA A Stated she worked with agency and today was her first day in the facility. She stated there was an orientation on the agency app prior to taking a shift at the facility, she did not know if feeding was part of that orientation. CNA A Stated Resident #1 did not have the strength to eat and that she was told in report (employee to employee review of residents' conditions) this morning by the night nurse to feed and give fluids to Resident #1 with the syringe so she would not be dehydrated. CNA A stated she had given Resident #1 two full 60 cc syringes of health shake this morning. She stated she had not been instructed by the building DON or ADON to feed or give fluids to a resident with a syringe. In an interview on 3/11/25 at 12:20pm the DON stated Resident #1 had been unresponsive for about 2-3 days. The DON stated it was not normal practice to feed or give fluids to residents with a syringe. She stated The Family Member was insistent with hospice that it could be done. The DON stated the CNAs have not been trained to feed or give fluids using a syringe unless the hospice nurse instructed them to do so. She stated Resident #1 could get aspiration pneumonia (an infection that is the results of food or fluids going into the lungs instead of the stomach). The DON stated feeding residents with a syringe is not facility protocol. She stated the 60 cc syringe came from Hospice. In an interview on 3/11/25 at 1:02pm LVN B stated she had worked at the facility for 3 days and she was the charge nurse for Resident #1. She stated she was aware Resident #1 was on hospice for a cardiac condition and Resident #1 had a hip injury that was nonoperational. She stated Resident #1's family was upset she was not eating, and she had talked to the family about reasons including end of life. She stated she also explained to the family that she could aspirate (a condition where the fluid goes into the lung) if she was not swallowing. LVN B stated at no time did CNA A report that the night nurse had instructed her to feed or give fluids to Resident #1 with a syringe. She stated it also was not passed along in their nursing report from the night nurse. She stated the Resident #1 was unresponsive this morning. LVN B stated feeding or giving fluids through a syringe to a resident who was not responsive could lead to the resident aspirating. LVN B stated she did an assessment on Resident #1, and her lungs were clear (free from abnormal sounds of respirations). LVN B stated a Chest x ray was ordered by the physician, and the facility was waiting on that to be completed. Attempted to contact LVN C who works night shift (6pm -6am) on 3/10/25 on 3/11/25 at 1:42pm with no answer. In an interview with a Family Member of Resident #1 on 3/11/25 at 2:51pm stated when she had mentioned giving Resident #1 fluids through a syringe, she was not talking about a large syringe full of fluids. She stated she was asking for the staff to give her drips out of a small syringe. She stated something to keep Resident #1's mouth moist. She stated she did not ask for them to force feed her. She stated she just wanted Resident #1's mouth moist, not as dry; she wanted her to have oral care, swab her mouth out, not force feed her though a syringe. In an interview on 3/11/25 at 3:00pm with The Medical Director and Primary Care Physician for Resident #1 stated it was not recommend feeding or give fluids by mouth a resident with a syringe. He stated he was over the Resident#1's hospice company as well and he had called hospice, and they had no recommendations for feeding or giving fluids through a syringe either. He stated if a person were to squirt a bunch of thin liquids at one time into Resident#1's mouth she would aspirate, causing choking, and pneumonia. He stated the resident was not eating. He stated he did listen to Resident #1's lungs, and they sounded clear and did not see any harm from the resident receiving the thin liquids per the syringe. He stated he did instruct the nursing staff not to feed or give fluids to her through the syringe. He stated he ordered routine oral care to be completed to ensure the residents mouth was moist. In an interview on 3/11/25 at 3:46pm RN D Resident #1's hospice nurse stated hospice did not recommend feeding or giving fluids to Resident #1 with a syringe. He stated The Family Member had called him and was upset that the facility would not feed Resident #1 with a syringe. He stated he educated the family on risk of feeding and giving fluids with a syringe. He stated that he instructed the family that hospice would not feed or give fluids to Resident #1 with a syringe. He stated there was never an order to do that. The Family Member stated the night nurse told her that she got her to take a half of a bottle of health shake and she did not elaborate how she got her to take the fluid. He stated he had instructed the family on the death and dying process and that it was a traumatic event such as a hip fracture that causing the resident to further decline and that not having an appetite and not eating was part of that decline. He stated the resident has not been responsive the last 3-4 days. In an interview with the DON and ADM on 3/12/25 at 3:09pm when the DON stated there was never any formal training to feed or give residents any fluids through a syringe because it was not the facility practice to do so. She stated here was never any order for food or fluids to be given through a syringe because that it not the facility practice. The DON stated agency staff were aware of the Residents#1's plan or care through verbal report. She stated the agency staff were also given a point click care password so they could access the plan or care and be aware of resident's needs. The DON stated there was a book with specific instructions at the nurses' station on how to navigate point click care and facility policy and procedures provided to agency staff. She stated they encourage agency staff to ask questions if needed. Record review of facility policy titled Competency Evaluation dated 04/2024 and revised 01/2025 reflected: It is the policy of this facility to evaluate each employee to assure they meet appropriate competencies and skills for performing their job. An Immediate Jeopardy was identified on 3/12/2025 at 4:35pm and an IJ template was provided to the ADM and DON. The following Plan of Removal submitted by the facility was accepted on 03/13/2025 at 10:28am PLAN OF REMOVAL Problem: The facility failed to ensure that all nursing staff possess the competencies and skill sets necessary to provide nursing and related services to meet the residents' needs safely and in a manner that promotes each resident's rights, physical, mental, and psychological well-being. An audit was completed by nurse management to ensure no other residents were at risk. Resident #1 had a chest x-ray completed on 3/11/25 that showed no aspiration. Resident # 1 was assessed by the DON & the facility medical director. Resident #1 remains in the facility in stable condition. Immediate action: 1. As soon as the DON was made aware of the situation on 3/11/25 she immediately removed the syringe from the resident's room. 2. CNA #1 was given a one-on-one education by ADON on 3/11/25 that a resident should never be syringe fed. Our investigation revealed that an overnight nurse instructed the CNA to administer the resident ensure through a syringe. A telephone call was placed to the night nurse & a message left for her to call the facility. The night nurse had not returned our phone call. A message was left that she could not return to the facility until she spoke with the DON. 3. DON started In-servicing facility & agency licensed nurses & CNAS on 3/11/25 at 1:00pm that residents were never to fed via a syringe. All 6-2 & 2-10 nursing staff on duty were educated. In-services for facility licensed nurses & CNAS will be completed on 3/13/25. Any agency staff that has not previously been in-serviced will be required to complete the in-services prior to starting their shift. 4. DON/ADON started In-servicing on 3/12/25 with agency staff to ensure they were educated on where to find the residents plan of care. 5. DON/ADON started In-servicing on 3/12/25 with all CNAs both facility & agency on the importance of not attempting to feed a resident that is unresponsive. Any new facility or agency CNA will be provided the education prior to working. 6. The agency binder was reviewed to ensure that agency staff know where to look to review the residents plan of care. Interventions 7. Any new agency staff will be in-serviced by nurse management on how to find the residents plan of care prior to starting their shift. The education started on 3/12/25 & will be ongoing when new facility or agency staff are scheduled. 8. Shift Key will download the process of where to find the residents plan of care prior to accepting a shift. The ADON will be responsible for the communication to Shift Key. 9. Nurse management will review the residents' care plan to ensure that it reflects the resident's needs. The care plan review will be completed by 3/14/25. 10. When a resident experiences a change of condition the care plan will be updated to reflect the resident's current needs. The DON/ADON/ Unit Manager will be responsible for updating resident care plan when a change of condition is identified. Ongoing Projected completion 3/13/25 for facility nursing staff. Care Plan review will be completed by 3/14/25. Any staff member who was not present during initial in-servicing/training will not be allowed to assume their duties until in-service was completed. The DON/ADON/WC NURSE will complete Ongoing In-service/or weekend nurse supervisor, until all staff, weekend, prn, and agency staff in completed. Monitoring 1. Nurse management will question random CNAs 3 X's a week to ensure they understand Resident #1s plan of care. Nurse management will perform random questions 3 X's a week for 6 weeks. 2. Staff will complete a questionnaire related to providing care that reflects the resident's needs. 3. On 3/13/25 The DON/designee began a questionnaire to validate the effectiveness of the training. The questionnaire is conducted with facility staff. Immediate re-education will be completed by the DON/designee if any staff is unable to answer appropriately to the questions on the questionnaire. Staff will not be allowed to work until after completion of the questionnaire. Projected completion 3/14/25. 4. On 3/12/25 An impromptu QAPI meeting was conducted with the facility's Medical Director to notify of the potential for non-compliance and the action plan implemented for approval. 3/13/25 Surveyor Monitoring included the following: 1. Observation completed on 3/13/25 at 12:50pm reflected there was no longer a syringe for feeding In Resident #1's room. 2. Record review of Momentum Skilled Services 1:1 in service dated 3/11/25 signed by CNA#1 reflected that CNA A was given a one-on-one education by The ADON that read a resident should never be syringe fed. 3. Record review of Inservice dated 03/11/25 and 03/12/25 provided to licensed nurses and certified nurse aides reflected they had been educated by The DON that no residents would be fed or given fluids orally with a syringe for any reason. 4. Record review of facility in-service provided to agency staff working within the building dated 3/12/25 reflected that the residents plan of care was in the EMR (electronic medical record) under the [NAME] tab (a tab that contains certain needs for residents that staff may review). If they were to have any questions after reading the residents plan of care they must find their charge nurse for clarification. 5. Record review of facility in-service dated 03/12/25 provided to all certified nursing assistance both agency and facility staff reflected staff members must never attempt to feed or give fluids to a resident that was unresponsive. If they had a resident that was unresponsive, they must find the charge nurse for clarification. 6. The DON reviewed the agency binder to ensure the agency staff would be able to locate the residents plan of care to provide services. 7. Interviewed 22 nursing staff (CNA D, E,F,G,H,I,J,K,L,M,N,O,P,Q and LVN R,S,T,U,V,W,X) from all shifts and they stated they had been educated on not syringe feeding residents. They stated they had been educated on not attempting to feed unresponsive residents. They stated the risk for resident would be aspiration or choking. They stated they had been educated on where and how to locate a resident's plan of care to provide and meet the resident's needs. The agency staff were able to locate the facility binder with their expectations and EMR directions to provide services and care to residents. They stated if a plan of care did not seem accurate for a resident they would go to their charge nurse for clarification. They stated even if a nurse told them to do something that was out of their scope, they would report it to the ADON or DON for further clarification. The agency staff stated they were instructed prior to their shift to review the blue binder at the nurses' station. They stated within the binder there was current in-services for staff, policy and procedures for pain and falls, abuse, and neglect, also directions on how to navigate the electronic medical record to see the residents current plan of care. The binder also included current in-services for staff. Included in in-services within the blue binder were: no resident will be fed by syringe, Staff members must never attempt to feed a resident that is unresponsive, and where the plan of care is located within the EMR. 8. In an interview with The ADON on 3/13/25 at 2:46pm- The ADON stated the facility had posted an automatic notification that must be acknowledged to review in-services prior to the start of agency staffs shift instructing staff they must sign in at the nurses' station and all agency staff must read and abide by the blue binder located at the nurse's station. Within the blue binder was found an emergency phone list, items to report immediately, sign in sheets, facility management contacts. The binder also included current in-services for staff. Included in in-services within the blue binder were: no resident will be fed by syringe, Staff members must never attempt to feed a resident that is unresponsive, and where the plan of care is located within the EMR. Record review of shift key logs reflected the notification of in-services prior to coming on shift had been signed and acknowledged by 6 agency staff working 3/13/25. 9. Record review of a Care Plan Audit on 3/14/25 completed by the DON was 100% completed. The DON stated there were no further negative findings within the Care plan audit for all residents. She stated the care plans were accurate for Residents to reflects the resident's needs. 10. Signed QAPI minutes reviewed for 3/12/25 and reflected a meeting was held that included the facilities ADM, DON, ADON, MDS, and Medical Director The ADM and DON were informed the Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 03/14/2025 at 11:53am The facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of no actual harm with the potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy and a scope of Isolated due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems that were put into place.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive care plan to meet the medical and nursing...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive care plan to meet the medical and nursing needs and the services to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to complete an accurate comprehensive care plan for Resident #1, by not care planning her Hospice services received on 1/20/25. This failure could place residents at risk of not having their care and treatment needs met to ensure necessary care and services were provided for specific to Hospice specialized services. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's undated face sheet reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of Alzheimer Disease (A brain disorder that slowly destroys a person's memory), Dementia (the loss of cognitive function, remembering, thinking, and reasoning), Hypertension (elevated blood pressure), Bradycardia (a slow heart rate). Record review of Resident #1's Significant change in status MDS dated [DATE] reflected she Had a BIMS score of 00 indicating she had severe cognitive impaired. Resident #1 required Substantial/maximal assistance indicating the helper does more than half the effort or the helper lifts or holds trunk or limbs and provides more than half the effort for ADL care showering, upper and lower body dressing, and toileting hygiene. The MDS reflected Resident #1 was receiving hospice services. Record review of Resident #1's care plan dated 02/06/2025 reflected there was no care plan in place for her hospice services provided. Record review of Resident #1s' Physician orders for March 2025 reflected an order to admit to Hospice services on 01/20/2025. In an interview on 3/12/25 at 12:05 the MDS Coordinator RN stated upon a significant change MDS she was required to update the comprehensive care plan. She stated Resident #1 should have had a care plan updating the resident's services to include hospice care. She stated she just missed it. The MDS Coordinator stated it was important to update the plan of care as changes occur in residents' status to ensure the staff were aware of changes in care needs provided by staff. She stated the charge nurses the unit mangers were responsible for updating the care plan with acute changes. The MDS Coordinator stated the negative effects for not updating a care plan would be the resident would not receive proper care or care that was ordered. In an interview on 3/12/25 at 12:15PM the Unit Manager for Resident #1 stated The MDS coordinator should have initiated the hospice care plan. She stated she would update the care plan with acute changes in status. She stated updates were necessary for communication with staff resident's care needs. By not updating the care plan it could cause miscommunications and changes in condition that would not be noted or documented. Record review of facility policy titled Care Plan Revision Upon Status Change dated 04/2024 and revised on 01/2025 reflected: The purpose of this procedure is to provide a consistent process for reviewing and revising the care plan for those residents experiencing a status change. 1. The comprehensive care plan will be reviewed, and revised as necessary, when a resident experiences a status change. 2. Procedure for reviewing and revising the care plan when a resident experiences a status change: Upon identification of a change in status, the nurse will notify the MDS Coordinator, the physician, and the resident representative, if applicable. The care plan will be updated with the new or modified interventions. Staff involved in the care of the resident will report resident response to new or modified interventions. Care plans will be modified as needed by the MDS Coordinator or other designated staff member. The Unit Manager or other designated staff member will communicate care plan interventions to all staff involved in the resident's care. The Unit Manager or other designated staff member will conduct an audit on all residents experiencing a change in status, at the time the change in status is identified, to ensure care plans have been updated to reflect current resident needs.
Jan 2025 4 deficiencies 3 IJ
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to be free from abuse for one (Resid...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to be free from abuse for one (Resident #1) of five residents reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to protect Resident #1 from physical abuse when CNA A was slapped by Resident #1 across the face and CNA A slapped Resident #1 back across their face on 1/5/2025. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 01/22/2025. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 5:43 PM. While the IJ was removed on 01/23/2025, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a severity level of no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy because all staff had not been trained on abuse/neglect. This failure placed residents at risk of abuse, trauma, and/or psychosocial harm. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including traumatic bran dysfunction (an injury to the brain caused by external mechanical force), dementia (a group of symptoms affecting memory, thinking, and social abilities), senile degeneration of brain (progressive deterioration of brain tissue and function that occurs beyond what's considered normal aging), and age-related physical debility. Resident #1 had a BIMS score of 00 indicating severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #1's care plan, dated last reviewed 01/12/2025, reflected she had impaired cognitive function and impaired thought processes with interventions to cue, reorient, and supervise as needed, and to not correct her if she gets confused to reality. Review of a witness statement, dated 1/5/2025 and documented by CNA B, reflected the following: I witnessed [Resident #1] coming up to [CNA A] and hit her in the face [CNA A] slapped [Resident #1] on the left cheek and [Resident #1] sat by her afterwards. I went to the restroom afterwards came back got the administrators number called then went to inform the nurse. I did ask 2 coworkers on what to do I've never experienced situation before. Review of a written statement dated 1/5/25 and documented by CNA A, reflected the following: I was sitting on the brown table when [Resident #1] walked up to me and started talking to me from there she slapped me in my face from there I did reach and pushed her back with my hand in her face. Just to make myself clear I did not slap the resident on the face I put my heel of my hand on her left cheek and pushed her back. When I realized I may contact with her I apologized to the resident. Review of a video footage provided by the facility with a date/time stamp of 01/05/2025 11:51 am reflected CNA A seated on a bench/table with Resident #1 to her right-side adjusting items on the bench/table. Resident #1 then walked to the front of CNA A and the two appeared to be in conversation. Resident #1 could be seen moving both of her arms while talking and then raised her right arm and slapped CNA A across the right side of her face. CNA A was then seen raising her right arm all the way up and slapping Resident #1 back across the left side of her face and Resident #1 can be seen being turned about 45-degrees due to the slap. After that, Resident #1 and CNA A can be seen in conversation again, and Resident #1 turns to walk to her left when CNA A grabbed the back of Resident #1's shirt and pulled toward her, making Resident #1 fall into a seated position to the right side of CNA A on the bench/table. Review of CNA A's time stamp card dated 01/05 revealed she clocked in at 06:02 AM and clocked out at 10:04 PM, working a total of 16.03 hours. During a phone interview on 01/22/2025 at 12:37 PM with RN A she stated that she was the charge nurse during the morning of 01/05/2025 and that CNA A did not tell her that she had slapped Resident #1 back. It was not until after CNA B contacted the ADM and then went to speak with RN A that she was notified that CNA A had slapped the resident. She stated that after she was informed by CNA B, she immediately went to go assess Resident #1, who exhibited no signs of trauma, and had no redness or signs of bruising. During a phone interview on 01/22/2025 at 12:47 PM with CNA B, she revealed from her phone log that she called the ADM on 01/05/2025 at 2:17 PM to notify him of the alleged abuse of Resident #1 by CNA A that happened earlier that day at 11:51 AM. CNA B was instructed by the ADM to then go and write a statement of the events that occurred as well as to inform the charge nurse. During a phone interview on 01/22/2025 at 1:00 PM with the ADM (who is the abuse coordinator), when asked why CNA A was allowed to finish her shift, he stated that at that point in time and after getting [CNA A's] statement it was unclear whether [the alleged abuse] was incidental or intentional, he had no concern about other residents being harmed at that time. CNA A had spoken with the charge nurse and there was no concern. CNA A was moved out of the MC unit and allowed to finish the remainder of her shift working another hall of the facility. CNA A was terminated the next day. Review of the facility's Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation policy dated last revised 01/08/2023 reflected the following: It is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property. Physical Abuse includes, but is not limited to hitting, slapping, punching, biting, and kicking. It also includes controlling behavior through corporal punishment. Protection of Resident The facility will make efforts to ensure all residents are protected from physical and psychosocial harm, as well as additional abuse, during and after the investigation. Investigation of Alleged Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation 12. Any employee who has been accused of resident abuse is placed on leave with no resident contact until the investigation is complete. The IDON, ADON, and ADM were notified on 01/22/2025 at 5:43 PM that an Immediate Jeopardy had been identified due to the above failures and an IJ template was provided. The following POR was accepted on 01/23/2025 at 5:15 PM: PLAN OF REMOVAL Name of facility: [name of facility] Date: 1/22/25 F 600 - Problem: The facility failed to keep the residents free from abuse. Resident #1 Was immediately assessed by the nurse without noted injuries and remains in the facility in stable condition. Immediate action: 1. On 1/22/25 The facility IDON/ADON/Designee immediately initiated skin assessments to ensure no s/s of physical injuries were present in all residents currently residing at the facility- no issues noted. Completed 1/23/25 2. On 1/22/25 The facility Adm/IDON/Designee initiated Life safety rounds with interviewable residents, interviews revealed no negative outcomes. Non-interviewable residents' responsible parties will also be interviewed. Any issues identified will be addressed immediately. Completed 1/23/25 3. On 1/22/25 The VPO conducted a 1:1 in-service with the facility administrator on the company abuse and neglect policy focusing on immediately suspending employees pending allegations of abuse and neglect. This included returned verbalized understanding of the process. This was documented on a signed in-service sheet. Any reportable incidents will also be reported to the corporate VP of Operation and or VP of Clinical to ensure an appropriate investigation, interventions and follow-up takes place. Any issues identified with this process will be addressed through further education and or disciplinary action. Interventions 4. On 1/22/25 The Adm initiated an in-service with the facility management staff on expectations to assure residents safety, abuse and neglect policy and reporting incidents immediately, this includes removing/suspending any staff members involved with any allegations or suspicion of abuse. Comprehension was verified by successfully completing a questionnaire on the subject, Completed 1/23/25 5. On 1/22/25 The facility Adm/IDON/Designee initiated an in-service with the staff on the corporate compliance hot line to report unusual events. Comprehension was verified by successfully completing a questionnaire on the subject, Completed 1/23/25 On 1/22/25 The facility Adm/DON/Designee initiated in-service with the facility staff on Abuse and Neglect focusing on ensuring residents safety and immediately reporting suspected abuse or neglect to the abuse prevention coordinator and or the corporate compliance hot line. The Abuse prevention coordinator contact information is posted throughout the facility. The abuse prevention coordinator will suspend, investigate, rule out, or report any allegation of abuse and neglect within the allotted time frame. Completed 1/23/25. Ongoing Projected completion 1/23/25. Any staff member not present during initial in-servicing/training will not be allowed to assume their duties until in-service. Ongoing In-service will be completed by IDON/ADON/WC NURSE/or weekend nurse supervisor, until all staff, weekend, PRN, and agency staff in completed. Monitoring 1. The facility IDT conduct residents Angel Rounds at least 5xweek to ensure residents do not have unknown safety concerns. Any concerns will be documented on the rounding sheet then turned to the administrator/Designee for immediately follow up. VP of Ops and/or Regional Nurse will provide additional oversight to ensure steps are completed. On going 1/22/25. 2. On 1/22/23 The DON/designee began a questionnaire to validate the effectiveness of the training. The questionnaire is conducted with facility staff. Immediate re-education will be completed by the DNS/designee if any staff is unable to answer appropriately to the questions on the questionnaire. Staff will not be allowed to work until after completion of the questionnaire. Projected completion 1/23/25. 3. On 1/22/25 An impromptu QAPI meeting was conducted with the facility's Medical Director to notify of the potential for non-compliance and the action plan implemented for approval. Plan approved on 1/22/25. 4. Any reportable incidents will also be reported to the corporate VP of Operation and or VP of Clinical to ensure an appropriate investigation, interventions and follow-up takes place. Any issues identified with this process will be addressed through further education and or disciplinary action 1/22/25. The surveyor monitored the POR on 01/23/2025 as followed: During interviews on 01/23/2025 from 4:30pm -5:20pm 3 CNA's, 1 LVN, and 1 MA (from all 3 shifts) all stated they were in-serviced before starting their shift on 01/23/2025 and then given questionnaires to complete to verify their knowledge. All were able to state that their abuse coordinator was the ADM, if he were not available, they were to notify the ADON, IDON, or charge nurse. They were all able to give examples of physical, verbal, and emotional abuse. All expressed the importance of reporting abuse the first time they see or hear it. All know where the corporate compliance hotline number is posted and know when to contact if needed. During interviews on 01/23/2025 from 3:55pm-4:20pm with 3 alert and oriented residents revealed they had recently had communication with management regarding their satisfaction with living at the facility and that they have no concerns about their safety, the staff that provide their daily care, or the management at the facility. Interview with the ADM on 1/23/2025 at 5:10pm, he stated he was in-serviced one-on-one with the VPO regarding the timeliness of reporting alleged abuse to HHSC (within 2 hours of the alleged abuse), keeping residents safe, prevention of abuse, and that he was to notify the VPO anytime an allegation was made of ANE. The ADM stated that all employees will be in-serviced before the start of their next shift. The ADM also stated that CNA A was terminated on 1/6/2025. Review of skin assessments dated 1/22/2025-1/23/2025 of all residents revealed no new skin issues/concerns. Review of one-on-one in-service dated 1/22/2025 titled Health and Human Services Reportable Guidelines presented by the VPO to the ADM revealed he went over review of the facility abuse, neglect, and exploitation policy. Included a review of policy section III. Prevention of abuse, neglect, and exploitation, and section VI. Investigation of alleged abuse, neglect and exploitation and section VII. Protection of resident. Review of in-service dated 1/22/2025 titled 'Abuse and Neglect policy: prevention and reporting' was provided by the ADM to department managers. Review of in-service dated 1/22/2025 titled 'Abuse and Neglect policy: It is our policy to ensure resident safety and immediately report suspected abuse or neglect to the abuse coordinator', and listed the ADM's telephone number, was provided to direct care staff. Review of in-service dated 1/22/2025 titled 'Company Compliance Program' revealed information on the company's compliance hotline for employees to contact and was provided to direct care staff. Review of in-service titled 'Angel/Ambassador Rounds Policy' with the policy attached was provided to Angel Round staff members. Review of 'Responsible Party Contact Log' dated week of 1/20/2025 revealed 48 residents' responsible parties were contacted and notes were written regarding complaints/praises/remarks. No notes made regarding suspected abuse/neglect. Review of Safe Surveys dated week of 1/20/2025-1/24/2025 revealed no residents expressing concerns regarding their safety or abusive staff. Review of multiple employee Abuse/Neglect and Compliance Questionnaire's dated between 1/22/2025-1/23/2025 revealed staff answered questions based on the in-services provided. Review of QAPI meeting notes dated 1/22/2025 revealed an email from the MD stating his agreement to their path moving forward. The ADM was informed the IJ was removed on 01/23/2025 at 5:15 PM. The facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of no actual harm and a scope of isolated that is not immediate jeopardy due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems that were put into place.
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Abuse Prevention Policies (Tag F0607)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their written policies and procedures regarding investiga...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their written policies and procedures regarding investigating abuse for one (Resident #1) of five residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. The facility failed to ensure CNA A was suspended/terminated or removed from working with all residents after she slapped a resident in the memory care unit, potentially causing additional abuse and/or emotional distress. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 01/22/2025. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 5:43 PM. While the IJ was removed on 01/23/2025, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a severity level of no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy because all staff had not been trained on abuse/neglect. This failure placed residents at risk of abuse, trauma, and psychosocial harm. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including traumatic bran dysfunction (an injury to the brain caused by external mechanical force), dementia (a group of symptoms affecting memory, thinking, and social abilities), senile degeneration of brain (progressive deterioration of brain tissue and function that occurs beyond what's considered normal aging), and age-related physical debility. Review of Resident #1's care plan, dated last reviewed 01/12/2025, reflected she had impaired cognitive function and impaired thought processes with interventions to cue, reorient, and supervise as needed, and to not correct her if she gets confused to reality. Review of a witness statement, dated 1/5/2025 and documented by CNA B, reflected the following: I witnessed [Resident #1] coming up to [CNA A] and hit her in the face [CNA A] slapped [Resident #1] on the left cheek and [Resident #1] sat by her afterwards. I went to the restroom afterwards came back got the administrators number called then went to inform the nurse. I did ask 2 coworkers on what to do I've never experienced situation before. Review of written statement dated 1/5/25 and documented by CNA A, reflected the following: I was sitting on the brown table when [Resident #1] walked up to me and started talking to me from there she slapped me in my face from there I did reach and pushed her back with my hand in her face. Just to make myself clear I did not slap the resident on the face I put my heel of my hand on her left cheek and pushed her back. When I realized I may contact with her I apologized to the resident. Review of video footage provided by the facility with a date/time stamp of 01/05/2025 11:51 am reflected CNA A seated on a bench/table with Resident #1 to her right-side adjusting items on the bench/table. Resident #1 then walked to the front of CNA A and the two appeared to be in conversation. Resident #1 could be seen moving both of her arms while talking and then raised her right arm and slapped CNA A across the right side of her face. CNA A is then seen raising her right arm all the way up and slapping Resident #1 back across the left side of her face and Resident #1 can be seen being turned about 45-degrees due to the slap. After that, Resident #1 and CNA A can be seen in conversation again, and Resident #1 turns to walk to her left when CNA A grabbed the back of Resident #1's shirt and pulled toward her, making Resident #1 fall into a seated position to the right side of CNA A on the bench/table. Review of CNA A's time stamp card dated 01/05 revealed she clocked in at 06:02 AM and clocked out at 10:04 PM, working a total of 16.03 hours. During a phone interview on 01/22/2025 at 12:37 PM with RN A she stated that she was the charge nurse during the morning of 01/05/2025 and that CNA A did not tell her that she had slapped Resident #1 back. It was not until after CNA B contacted the ADM and then went to speak with RN A that she was notified that CNA A had slapped the resident. She stated that after she was informed by CNA B, she immediately went to go assess Resident #1. During a phone interview on 01/22/2025 at 12:47 PM with CNA B, she revealed from her phone log that she called the ADM on 01/05/2025 at 2:17 PM to notify him of the alleged abuse of Resident #1 by CNA A that happened earlier that day at 11:51 AM. CNA B was instructed by the ADM to then go and write a statement of the events that occurred as well as to inform the charge nurse. During a phone interview on 01/22/2024 at 1:00 PM with the ADM, when asked why CNA A was allowed to finish her shift, he stated that at that point in time and after getting [CNA A's] statement it was unclear whether [the alleged abuse] was incidental or intentional, he had no concern about other residents being harmed at that time. CNA A had spoken with the charge nurse and there was no concern. CNA A was moved out of the MC unit and allowed to finish the remainder of her shift working another hall of the facility. CNA A was terminated the next day. During a phone interview on 01/22/2025 at 1:41 PM with the NP she stated that she expected facilities to immediately suspend an employee who had abused a resident and report it to HHSC. She stated that you can never tell if it could happen again. If the perpetrator were to stay working with the resident it could get worse for the resident. Review of the facility's Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation policy dated last revised 01/08/2023 reflected the following: It is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property. Physical Abuse includes, but is not limited to hitting, slapping, punching, biting, and kicking. It also includes controlling behavior through corporal punishment. Protection of Resident The facility will make efforts to ensure all residents are protected from physical and psychosocial harm, as well as additional abuse, during and after the investigation. Investigation of Alleged Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation 12. Any employee who has been accused of resident abuse is placed on leave with no resident contact until the investigation is complete. The IDON, ADON, and ADM were notified on 01/22/2025 at 5:43 PM that an Immediate Jeopardy had been identified due to the above failures and an IJ template was provided. The following POR was accepted on 01/23/2025 at 5:15 PM: PLAN OF REMOVAL Name of facility: [name of facility] Date: 1/22/25 F 607 -Problem: The facility failed to implement written policies and procedures to investigate allegations of abuse Resident #1 Was immediately assessed by the nurse without noted injuries. Remains in the facility in stable condition. Immediate action: 1. On 1/22/25 The facility IDON/ADON/Designee immediately initiated skin assessments to ensure no s/s of physical injuries were present in all residents currently residing at the facility- no issues noted. Completed 1/23/25 2. On 1/22/25 The facility Adm/IDON/Designee initiated Life safety rounds with interviewable residents, Interviews revealed no new negative events. Completed 1/23/25. 3. On 1/22/25 The VPO conducted a 1:1 in-service with the facility administrator on the company abuse and neglect policy focusing on immediately suspending employees pending allegations of abuse and neglect. This included returned verbalized understanding of the process. This was documented on a signed in-service sheet. Any reportable incidents will also be reported to the corporate VP of Operation and or VP of Clinical to ensure an appropriate investigation, interventions and follow-up takes place. Any issues identified with this process will be addressed through further education and or disciplinary action. Interventions On 1/22/25 The Adm initiated an in-service with the facility management staff on expectations to assure residents safety, abuse and neglect policy and reporting incidents immediately, this includes removing/suspending any staff members involved with any allegations or suspicion of abuse. Any staff member not present during initial in-servicing/training will not be allowed to assume their duties until in-service. Ongoing In-service will be completed by IDON/ADON/WC NURSE/or weekend nurse supervisor, until all staff, weekend, prn, and agency staff in completed. Comprehension was verified by successfully completing a questionnaire on the subject. Completed 1/23/25 4. On 1/22/25 The facility Adm/IDON/Designee initiated an in-service with the staff on the corporate compliance hot line to report unusual events. Comprehension was verified by successfully completing a questionnaire on the subject. Completed 1/23/25 5. On 1/22/25 The facility Adm/DON/Designee initiated in-service with the facility staff on Abuse and Neglect focusing on ensuring residents safety and immediately reporting suspected abuse or neglect to the abuse prevention coordinator and or the corporate compliance hot line. The Abuse prevention coordinator contact information is posted throughout the facility. The abuse prevention coordinator will suspend, investigate, rule out, or report any allegation of abuse and neglect within the allotted time frame. Comprehension was verified by successfully completing a questionnaire on the subject, Completed 1/23/25. Ongoing Projected completion 1/23/25. Any staff member not present during initial in-servicing/training will not be allowed to assume their duties until in-service. Ongoing In-service will be completed by IDON/ADON/WC NURSE/or weekend nurse supervisor, until all staff, weekend, prn, and agency staff in completed. Monitoring 1. The facility IDT conduct residents Angel Rounds at least 5xweek to ensure residents do not have unknown safety concerns. Any concerns will be reported to the Adm/Designee immediately for proper follow up. VP of Ops and/or Regional Nurse will provide additional oversight to ensure steps are completed. On going 1/22/25. 2. On 1/22/23 The DON/designee began a questionnaire to validate the effectiveness of the training. The questionnaire is conducted with facility staff. Immediate re-education will be completed by the DNS/designee if any staff is unable to answer appropriately to the questions on the questionnaire. Staff will not be allowed to work until after completion of the questionnaire. Projected completion 1/23/25. 3. On 1/22/25 An impromptu QAPI meeting was conducted with the facility's Medical Director to notify of the potential for non-compliance and the action plan implemented for approval. Plan approved on 1/22/25. The surveyor monitored the POR on 01/23/2025 as followed: During interviews on 01/23/2025 from 3:55pm-4:20pm with 3 alert and oriented residents revealed they had recently had communication with management regarding their satisfaction with living at the facility and that they have no concerns about their safety, the staff that provide their daily care, or the management at the facility. During interviews on 01/23/2025 from 4:30pm -5:20pm 3 CNA's, 1 LVN, and 1 CMA (from all 3 shifts) all stated they were in-serviced before starting their shift on 01/23/2025 and then given questionnaires to complete to verify their knowledge. All were able to state that their abuse coordinator was the ADM, if he were not available, they were to notify the ADON, IDON, or charge nurse. They were all able to give examples of physical, verbal, and emotional abuse. All expressed the importance of reporting abuse the first time they see or hear it. All know where the corporate compliance hotline number is posted and know when to contact if needed. Interview with the ADM on 1/23/2025 at 5:10pm, he stated he was in-serviced one-on-one with the VPO regarding the timeliness of reporting alleged abuse to HHSC (within 2 hours of the alleged abuse), keeping residents safe, prevention of abuse, and that he is to notify the VPO anytime an allegation is made of ANE. The ADM stated that all employees will be in-serviced before the start of their next shift. The ADM also stated that CNA A was terminated on 1/6/2025. Review of skin assessments dated 1/22/2025-1/23/2025 of all residents revealed no new skin issues/concerns. Review of one-on-one in-service dated 1/22/2025 titled Health and Human Services Reportable Guidelines presented by the VPO to the ADM revealed he went over review of the facility abuse, neglect, and exploitation policy. Included a review of policy section III. Prevention of abuse, neglect, and exploitation, and section VI. Investigation of alleged abuse, neglect and exploitation and section VII. Protection of resident. Review of in-service dated 1/22/2025 titled 'Abuse and Neglect policy: prevention and reporting' was provided by the ADM to department managers. Review of in-service dated 1/22/2025 titled 'Abuse and Neglect policy: It is our policy to ensure resident safety and immediately report suspected abuse or neglect to the abuse coordinator', and listed the ADM's telephone number, was provided to direct care staff. Review of in-service dated 1/22/2025 titled 'Company Compliance Program' revealed information on the company's compliance hotline for employees to contact and was provided to direct care staff. Review of in-service titled 'Angel/Ambassador Rounds Policy' with the policy attached was provided to Angel Round staff members. Review of 'Responsible Party Contact Log' dated week of 1/20/2025 revealed 48 residents' responsible parties were contacted and notes were written regarding complaints/praises/remarks. No notes made regarding suspected abuse/neglect. Review of Safe Surveys dated week of 1/20/2025-1/24/2025 revealed no residents expressing concerns regarding their safety or abusive staff. Review of multiple employee Abuse/Neglect and Compliance Questionnaire's dated between 1/22/2025-1/23/2025 revealed staff answered questions based on the in-services provided. Review of QAPI meeting notes dated 1/22/2025 revealed an email from the MD stating his agreement to their path moving forward. The ADM was informed the IJ was removed on 01/23/2025 at 5:15 PM. The facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of no actual harm and a scope of isolated that is not immediate jeopardy due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems that were put into place.
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Investigate Abuse (Tag F0610)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to, in response to allegations of abuse, prevent further potential abu...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to, in response to allegations of abuse, prevent further potential abuse for one (Resident #1) of five residents reviewed for abuse and neglect while the investigation of alleged abuse was in progress. The facility failed to ensure CNA A was suspended/terminated or removed from working with all residents while the investigation of alleged abuse was ongoing. CNA A was moved to another wing to continue the remainder of her shift working with other residents for approximately 10 additional hours on the day she slapped a resident in the memory care unit. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 01/22/2025. The IJ template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 5:43 PM. While the IJ was removed on 01/23/2025, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a severity level of no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy because all staff had not been trained on abuse/neglect. This failure placed residents at risk of abuse, trauma, and/or psychosocial harm. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including traumatic bran dysfunction (an injury to the brain caused by external mechanical force), dementia (a group of symptoms affecting memory, thinking, and social abilities), senile degeneration of brain (progressive deterioration of brain tissue and function that occurs beyond what's considered normal aging), and age-related physical debility. Resident #1 had a BIMS score of 00 indicating severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #1's care plan, dated last reviewed 01/12/2025, reflected she had impaired cognitive function and impaired thought processes with interventions to cue, reorient, and supervise as needed, and to not correct her if she gets confused to reality. Review of a witness statement, dated 1/5/2025 and documented by CNA B, reflected the following: I witnessed [Resident #1] coming up to [CNA A] and hit her in the face [CNA A] slapped [Resident #1] on the left cheek and [Resident #1] sat by her afterwards. I went to the restroom afterwards came back got the administrators number called then went to inform the nurse. I did ask 2 coworkers on what to do I've never experienced situation before. Review of written statement dated 1/5/25 and documented by CNA A, reflected the following: I was sitting on the brown table when [Resident #1] walked up to me and started talking to me from there she slapped me in my face from there I did reach and pushed her back with my hand in her face. Just to make myself clear I did not slap the resident on the face I put my heel of my hand on her left cheek and pushed her back. When I realized I may contact with her I apologized to the resident. Review of video footage provided by the facility with a date/time stamp of 01/05/2025 11:51 am reflected CNA A seated on a bench/table with Resident #1 to her right-side adjusting items on the bench/table. Resident #1 then walked to the front of CNA A and the two appeared to be in conversation. Resident #1 could be seen moving both of her arms while talking and then raised her right arm and slapped CNA A across the right side of her face. CNA A is then seen raising her right hand all the way up and slapping Resident #1 back across the left side of her face and Resident #1 can be seen being turned about 45-degrees due to the slap. After that Resident #1 and CNA A can be seen in conversation again, and Resident #1 turns to walk to her left when CNA A grabbed the back of Resident #1's shirt and pulled toward her, making Resident #1 fall into a seated position to the right side of CNA A on the bench/table. Review of CNA A's time stamp card dated 01/05 revealed she clocked in at 06:02 AM and clocked out at 10:04 PM, working a total of 16.03 hours. During a phone interview on 01/22/2025 at 12:37 PM with RN A she stated that she was the charge nurse during the morning of 01/05/2025 and that CNA A did not tell her that she had slapped Resident #1 back. It was not until after CNA B contacted the ADM and then went to speak with RN A that she was notified that CNA A had slapped the resident. She stated that after she was informed by CNA B she immediately went to go assess Resident #1. During a phone interview on 01/22/2025 at 12:47 PM with CNA B, she revealed from her phone log that she called the ADM on 01/05/2025 at 2:17 PM to notify him of the alleged abuse of Resident #1 by CNA A that happened earlier that day at 11:51 AM. CNA B was instructed by the ADM to then go and write a statement of the events that occurred as well as to inform the charge nurse. During a phone interview on 01/22/2025 at 1:00 PM with the ADM, when asked why CNA A was allowed to finish her shift he stated that at that point in time and after getting [CNA A's] statement it was unclear whether [the alleged abuse] was incidental or intentional, he had no concern about other residents being harmed at that time. CNA A had spoken with the charge nurse and there was no concern. CNA A was moved out of the MC unit and allowed to finish the remainder of her shift working another hall of the facility. CNA A was terminated the next day. During a phone interview on 01/22/2025 at 1:41 PM with the NP she stated that she expected facilities to immediately suspend an employee who had abused a resident and report it to HHSC. She stated that you can never tell if it could happen again. If the perpetrator were to stay working with the resident it could get worse for the resident. Review of the facility's Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation policy dated last revised 01/08/2023 reflected the following: It is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property. Physical Abuse includes, but is not limited to hitting, slapping, punching, biting, and kicking. It also includes controlling behavior through corporal punishment. Protection of Resident The facility will make efforts to ensure all residents are protected from physical and psychosocial harm, as well as additional abuse, during and after the investigation. Investigation of Alleged Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation 12. Any employee who has been accused of resident abuse is placed on leave with no resident contact until the investigation is complete. The DON, ADON, and ADM were notified on 01/22/2025 at 5:43 PM that an Immediate Jeopardy had been identified due to the above failures and an IJ template was provided. The following POR was accepted on 01/23/2025 at 5:15 PM: PLAN OF REMOVAL Name of facility: [name of facility] Date: 1/22/25 F 610 -Problem: The facility failed to prevent further potential abuse while the investigation was in progress. Resident #1 Was immediately assessed by the nurse without noted injuries Remains in the facility in stable condition. Immediate action: 1. On 1/22/25 The facility IDON/ADON/Designee immediately initiated skin assessments to ensure no s/s of physical injuries were present in all residents currently residing at the facility- no issues noted. Completed 1/23/25 2. On 1/22/25 The facility Adm/IDON/Designee initiated Life safety rounds with interviewable residents, Interviews revealed no new negative events. Completed 1/23/25. 3. On 1/22/25 The VPO conducted a 1:1 in-service with the facility administrator on the company abuse and neglect policy focusing on immediately suspending employees pending allegations of abuse and neglect. This included returned verbalized understanding of the process. This was documented on a signed in-service sheet. Any reportable incidents will also be reported to the corporate VP of Operation and or VP of Clinical to ensure an appropriate investigation, interventions and follow-up takes place. Any issues identified with this process will be addressed through further education and or disciplinary action. Interventions 4. On 1/22/25 The Adm initiated an in-service with the facility management staff on expectations to assure residents safety, abuse and neglect policy and reporting incidents immediately, this includes removing/suspending any staff members involved with any allegations or suspicion of abuse. Comprehension was verified by successfully completing a questionnaire on the subject Completed 1/23/25 5. On 1/22/25 The facility Adm/IDON/Designee initiated an in-service with the staff on the corporate compliance hot line to report unusual events. Comprehension was verified by successfully completing a questionnaire on the subject Completed 1/23/25. 6. On 1/22/25 The facility Adm/DON/Designee initiated in-service with the facility staff on Abuse and Neglect focusing on ensuring residents safety and immediately reporting suspected abuse or neglect to the abuse prevention coordinator and or the corporate compliance hot line. The Abuse prevention coordinator contact information is posted throughout the facility. The abuse prevention coordinator will suspend, investigate, rule out, or report any allegation of abuse and neglect within the allotted time frame. Comprehension was verified by successfully completing a questionnaire on the subject Completed 1/23/25. Ongoing Projected completion 1/23/25. Any staff member not present during initial in-servicing/training will not be allowed to assume their duties until in-service. Ongoing In-service will be completed by IDON/ADON/WC NURSE/or weekend nurse supervisor, until all staff, weekend, prn, and agency staff in completed. Monitoring 1. The facility IDT conduct residents Angel Rounds at least 5xweek to ensure residents do not have unknown safety concerns. Any concerns will be reported to the Adm/Designee immediately for proper follow up. VP of Ops and/or Regional Nurse will provide additional oversight to ensure steps are completed On going 1/22/25. 2. On 1/22/23 The DON/designee began a questionnaire to validate the effectiveness of the training. The questionnaire is conducted with facility staff. Immediate re-education will be completed by the DNS/designee if any staff is unable to answer appropriately to the questions on the questionnaire. Staff will not be allowed to work until after completion of the questionnaire. Projected completion 1/23/25. 3. On 1/22/25 An impromptu QAPI meeting was conducted with the facility's Medical Director to notify of the potential for non-compliance and the action plan implemented for approval. Plan approved on 1/22/25. The surveyor monitored the POR on 01/23/2025 as followed: During interviews on 01/23/2025 from 4:30pm -5:20pm 3 CNA's, 1 LVN, and 1 CMA (from all 3 shifts) all stated they were in-serviced before starting their shift on 01/23/2025 and then given questionnaire's to complete to verify their knowledge. All were able to state that their abuse coordinator was the ADM, if he were not available, they were to notify the ADON, IDON, or charge nurse. They were all able to give examples of physical, verbal, and emotional abuse. All expressed the importance of reporting abuse the first time they see or hear it. All know where the corporate compliance hotline number is posted and know when to contact if needed. During interviews on 01/23/2024 from 3:55pm-4:20pm with 3 alert and oriented residents revealed they had recently had communication with management regarding their satisfaction with living at the facility and that they have no concerns about their safety, the staff that provide their daily care, or the management at the facility. During interviews on 01/23/2025 from 4:30pm -5:20pm 3 CNA's, 1 LVN, and 1 CMA (from all 3 shifts) all stated they were in-serviced before starting their shift on 01/23/2025 and then given questionnaires to complete to verify their knowledge. All were able to state that their abuse coordinator was the ADM, if he were not available, they were to notify the ADON, IDON, or charge nurse. They were all able to give examples of physical, verbal, and emotional abuse. All expressed the importance of reporting abuse the first time they see or hear it. All know where the corporate compliance hotline number is posted and know when to contact if needed. Interview with the ADM on 1/23/2025 at 5:10pm, he stated he was in-serviced one-on-one with the VPO regarding the timeliness of reporting alleged abuse to HHSC (within 2 hours of the alleged abuse), keeping residents safe, prevention of abuse, and that he is to notify the VPO anytime an allegation is made of ANE. The ADM stated that all employees will be in-serviced before the start of their next shift. Review of skin assessments dated 1/22/2025-1/23/2025 of all residents revealed no new skin issues/concerns. Review of one-on-one in-service dated 1/22/2025 titled Health and Human Services Reportable Guidelines presented by the VPO to the ADM revealed he went over review of the facility abuse, neglect, and exploitation policy. Included a review of policy section III. Prevention of abuse, neglect, and exploitation, and section VI. Investigation of alleged abuse, neglect and exploitation and section VII. Protection of resident. Review of in-service dated 1/22/2025 titled 'Abuse and Neglect policy: prevention and reporting' was provided by the ADM to department managers. Review of in-service dated 1/22/2025 titled 'Abuse and Neglect policy: It is our policy to ensure resident safety and immediately report suspected abuse or neglect to the abuse coordinator', and listed the ADM's telephone number, was provided to direct care staff. Review of in-service dated 1/22/2025 titled 'Company Compliance Program' revealed information on the company's compliance hotline for employees to contact and was provided to direct care staff. Review of in-service titled 'Angel/Ambassador Rounds Policy' with the policy attached was provided to Angel Round staff members. Review of 'Responsible Party Contact Log' dated week of 1/20/2025 revealed 48 residents' responsible parties were contacted and notes were written regarding complaints/praises/remarks. No notes made regarding suspected abuse/neglect. Review of multiple employee Abuse/Neglect and Compliance Questionnaire's dated between 1/22/2025-1/23/2025 revealed staff answered questions based on the in-services provided. Review of QAPI meeting notes dated 1/22/2025 revealed an email from the MD stating his agreement to their path moving forward. The ADM was informed the IJ was removed on 01/23/2025 at 5:15 PM. The facility remained out of compliance at a severity level of no actual harm and a scope of isolated that is not immediate jeopardy due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems that were put into place.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations involving abuse or neglect were repor...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations involving abuse or neglect were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made for one (Resident #1) of five residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. The facility failed to report alleged violations related to abuse within prescribed timeframes when CNA A witnessed abuse at 11:51 AM on 1/5/2025, did not report it to the ADM until 2:17 PM on 1/5/2025, and the ADM did not report to HHSC until 1/6/2025 at 8:43 PM. This failure placed residents at risk of abuse, trauma, and/or psychosocial harm. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including traumatic bran dysfunction (an injury to the brain caused by external mechanical force), dementia (a group of symptoms affecting memory, thinking, and social abilities), senile degeneration of brain (progressive deterioration of brain tissue and function that occurs beyond what's considered normal aging), and age-related physical debility. Resident #1 had a BIMS score of 00 indicating severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #1's care plan, dated last reviewed 01/12/2025, reflected she had impaired cognitive function and impaired thought processes with interventions to cue, reorient, and supervise as needed, and to not correct her if she gets confused to reality. Review of Provider Investigation Report Form 3613-A revealed the date reported to HHSC as 1.6.25 and time 8:43 PM, with the date of incident being 1.5.25 and the time of incident as 2:30 PM. Review of video footage provided by the facility with a date/time stamp of 01/05/2025 11:51 am reflected CNA A seated on a bench/table with Resident #1 to her right-side adjusting items on the bench/table. Resident #1 then walked to the front of CNA A and the two appeared to be in conversation. Resident #1 could be seen moving both of her arms while talking and then raised her right arm and slapped CNA A across the right side of her face. CNA A is then seen raising her right arm all the way up and slapping Resident #1 back across the left side of her face and Resident #1 can be seen being turned about 45-degrees due to the slap. After that, Resident #1 and CNA A can be seen in conversation again, and Resident #1 turns to walk to her left when CNA A grabbed the back of Resident #1's shirt and pulled toward her, making Resident #1 fall into a seated position to the right side of CNA A on the bench/table. During a phone interview on 01/22/2025 at 12:47 PM with CNA B, she revealed from her phone log that she called the ADM on 01/05/2025 at 2:17 PM to notify him of the alleged abuse of Resident #1 by CNA A that happened earlier that day at 11:51 AM. CNA B was instructed by the ADM to then go and write a statement of the events that occurred as well as to inform the charge nurse. CNA A stated she had to ask 2 coworkers what she needed to do in this situation because she had never experienced something like that before. During a phone interview on 01/22/2024 at 1:00 PM with the ADM, when asked why CNA A was allowed to finish her shift, he stated that at that point in time and after getting [CNA A's] statement it was unclear whether [the alleged abuse] was incidental or intentional, he had no concern about other residents being harmed at that time. CNA A had spoken with the charge nurse and there was no concern. CNA A was moved out of the MC unit and allowed to finish the remainder of her shift working another hall of the facility. CNA A was terminated the next day. Review of the facility's Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation policy dated last revised 01/08/2023 reflected the following: It is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property. Physical Abuse includes, but is not limited to hitting, slapping, punching, biting, and kicking. It also includes controlling behavior through corporal punishment. Reporting 1. Reporting of all alleged violations to the Administrator, state agency, adult protective services and to all other required agencies within specified timeframes: a. Immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury .
Dec 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0558 (Tag F0558)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received services in the facility...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received services in the facility with reasonable accommodations of each resident's needs for 4 of 5 residents (Residents #1, #2, #3, & #4) reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to ensure Residents #1, #2, #3, and #4's call light was within reach on 12/28/24. This failure could affect residents who needed assistance with activities of daily living and could result in needs not being met. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's admission record dated 12/28/24 documented a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included: need for assistance with personal care, major depressive disorder (loss of interest in activities), and essential primary hypertension (high blood pressure that is multi-factorial and doesn't have one distinct cause). Record review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 10/18/24, revealed the resident had a BIMS score of 03 indicating the resident had severe cognitive impairment. The MDS also revealed Resident #1 required substantial/maximal assistance in the areas of toileting hygiene, lower body dressing, upper body dressing, and putting on /taking off footwear. Record review of Resident #1's care plan, dated 12/28/24, revealed Resident #1 was care planned for ADL self-care performance deficit r/t activity intolerance, impaired balance, limited mobility, and limited ROM. Observation on 12/28/24 at 11:30 a.m., revealed Resident #1's call light was lying on the floor, right side of the bed, and out of her reach. During an interview on 12/28/24 at 11:30 a.m., Resident #1 stated she had wanted her blanket and a Dr. Pepper but was not able to get anyone to assist her because the call light was on the floor. Resident # 1 was not able to state how long the call light had been on the floor or when the last time staff had come in to assist her. Record review of Resident #2's admission record dated 12/28/24 documented an [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE]. Resident #2 had diagnoses which included: anemia (blood does not have enough healthy red blood cells and hemoglobin), acute kidney failure (kidneys suddenly can't filter waste from blood), and unspecified dementia (loss of memory can't be categorized as a specific type). Record review of Resident #2's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 10/14/24, revealed the resident had a BIMS score of 03 indicating the resident had severe cognitive impairment. The MDS also revealed Resident #1 required partial/moderate assistance in the areas of toileting hygiene, lower body dressing, upper body dressing, and putting on /taking off footwear. Record review of Resident #2's care plan, dated 12/28/24, revealed Resident #1 was care planned for assistance with ADL's r/t impaired mobility and dementia. Resident #2's goal was to receive assistance as needed with ADL's daily and ongoing. Observation on 12/28/24 at 11:34 a.m., revealed Resident #2's call light was wrapped around her headboard, behind her head, not within reach under the pillow. During an interview on 12/28/24 at 11:34 a.m., Resident #2 did not respond when asked where her call light was. Resident # 2 closed her eyes and appeared to be sleeping. Resident #2 was not able to be asked how long her call light was not in reach. Record review of Resident #3's admission record dated 12/28/24 documented a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE]. Resident #3 had diagnoses which included: type 2 diabetes (body has trouble controlling blood sugar and using it for energy), acute kidney failure (kidneys suddenly can't filter waste from the blood), and essential primary hypertension (high blood pressure with no identifiable cause). Record review of Resident #3's admission MDS assessment, dated 12/16/24, revealed the resident had a BIMS score of 15 indicating the resident was cognitively intact. The MDS also revealed Resident #3 was dependent in the area of shower/bathe self. Resident #3 required partial/moderate assistance in the areas of toileting hygiene, personal hygiene, upper body dressing, and putting on/taking of footwear. Record review of Resident #3's care plan, dated 12/28/24, revealed Resident #3 was care planned requiring assistance to perform functional abilities in self-care and mobility r/t other orthopedic conditions-bilateral knee contractures. Observation on 12/28/24 at 11:38 a.m., revealed Resident #3's call light on the floor, on the left side of the bed, and out of his reach. During an interview on 12/28/24 at 11:38 a.m., Resident #3 stated that he had been looking for his call light to get care staff to empty the bedside urinal. Resident # 3 stated he did not know where his call light was and could not recall how long it was missing. Resident # 3 was not able to provide how long it had been since staff came in to assist him. Or he had to holler out for staff. Record review of Resident #4's admission record dated 12/28/24 documented an [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE]. Resident #4 had diagnoses which included: essential primary hypertension (occurs when you have abnormally high blood pressure that's not the result of a medical condition), chronic kidney disease (waste built up in kidneys), and pulmonary hypertension (affects arteries in the lungs and the right side of the heart). Record review of Resident #4's Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 10/14/24, revealed the resident had a BIMS score of 12 indicating the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS also revealed Resident #4 required substantial/maximal assistance in the areas of toileting hygiene, shower/bathe self, lower body dressing, upper body dressing, personal hygiene, and putting on /taking off footwear. Record review of Resident #4's care plan, dated 12/28/24, revealed Resident #4 was care planned for assistance with all ADL's r/t weakness, impaired mobility, and dementia. Resident #4's goal was to receive assistance as needed with ADL's daily and ongoing. Observation on 12/28/24 at 11:40 a.m., revealed Resident #4''s call light was behind her, at the middle of her back, unable to be reached. During an interview on 12/28/24 at 11:40 a.m., Resident #4 stated she could not reach her call light because it was under her towards her back. Resident #4 stated she did not know the last time staff had come in or how long the call light was under her. During an interview on 12/28/24 at 1:15 p.m., CNA A stated CNAs should make rounds at least every two hours or as needed. CNA A stated that CNAs should be looking to see if a resident needed assistance, ensured call lights were within reach, and made sure all residents were comfortable. CNA A stated if a resident's call light was not within reach, then the resident's needs would not be met. During an interview on 12/28/24 at 1:29 p.m., the ADON stated that all staff that entered the resident's room was responsible for ensuring the call light was within reach. The ADON stated it was expected for all staff that entered a resident's room to make sure the call light was in reach so residents could notify staff that they needed assistance. The ADON stated if a resident's call light was not in reach, then the resident's needs would not have been met. An interview on 12/28/24 at 4:00 p.m., the ADM stated it was everyone's responsibility to ensure call lights were always within reach of the resident. The ADM stated that if a call light was not within reach, then a resident's needs would not be met. The ADM stated that it was expected for call lights to be always within reach of the residents. Review of the facility's Call Lights: Accessibility and Timely Response policy, revised 02/23, reflected, The purpose of this this policy is to assure the facility is adequately equipped with a call light at each resident's bedside, toilet, and bathing facility to allow residents to call for assistance. Call lights will directly relay to staff member or centralized location to ensure appropriate response.
Jul 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0573 (Tag F0573)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a reasonable cost-based fee for the provision of medical re...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a reasonable cost-based fee for the provision of medical records for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #1) who were reviewed for access to medical records. The facility failed to charge the RP, for Resident #1, reasonable prices for medical records cost determined in the Texas Health and Safety Code, Title 4. Health Facilities; Subtitle B. Licensing of Health Facilities; Chapter 241. Hospitals; Subchapter A. General Provisions; Section 241.154 (THSC 241.154.) This failure placed residents, or their RP, at risk for complications with continuity of care and financial hardship. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's Discharge MDS, dated [DATE], reflected the Resident was a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. She was diagnosed with peripheral vascular disease (which was slow and progressive circulation disorder caused by narrowing of the blood vessels.) Section C., Cognitive Patterns: Indicated Resident #1's short-term memory was appropriate; independent decisions were consistent and reasonable. Staff assessed BIMS. Record review of a release of information request, dated 2/12/2024, reflected RP #2's request for Resident #1's medical records from the facility. Record review of an invoice, dated 3/8/2024, reflected a cost breakdown for the medical records requested on 2/12/2024. The total cost was $274.28 for 216 pages. The invoice was sent by MRC A to RP #2. The cost breakdown reflected: 1. Pages 1-10 = $52.12 (search fee); 10 pages; Cost equaled $52.12 2. Pages 11-60 = $1.76 (per page); 50 pages; Cost equaled $88.00 3. Pages 61-400 = .86 (per page); 156 pages; Cost equaled $134.16 Invoice to RP #2, dated 3/8/2024, reflected $52.12 + $88.00 + $134.16= $274.28 Record review on 7/17/2024 of Texas Health and Safety Code, Title 4. Health Facilities; Subtitle B. Licensing of THSC 241.154, effective date 5/27/2023, reflected: (1) a basic retrieval or processing fee, which must include the fee for providing the first 10 pages of the copies and which may not exceed $30; and (A) a charge for each page of: (i) $1 for the 11th through the 60th page of the provided copies; (ii) .50 cents for the 61st through the 400th page of the provided copies. Having used a calculator on a state issued iPhone on 7/17/2024: Calculations for the 216 pages of Resident #1's medical record copies, based on THSC 241.154 reflected: 1. Pages 1-10 = $30.00 (basic retrieval and processing fee); 10 pages; Cost equaled $30.00 2. Pages 11-60 = $1.00 (per Page); 50 pages; Cost equaled $50.00 3. Pages 61-400 = .50 (per page; 156 pages; Cost equaled $78.00 Calculations with THSC 241.154 reflected $30.00 + $50.00 + $78.00= $158.00 Having used a calculator on a state issued iPhone on 7/17/2024: $274.28 - $158.00 = $116.28 of an inflated cost. Interview on 7/17/2024 at 9:45 AM with MRC B revealed the invoice for Resident #1's medical record copies was created on 3/8/2024, and sent to RP #2, by MRC A, who no longer worked at the facility. MRC B stated the CCO, from the corporate offices was the person who calculated the prices for medical records and calculated the amount of $274.28 for Resident #1's medical record copies. Interview on 7/17/2024 at 10:15 AM with RP #2 revealed the facility was unjust in asking for $274.28 for copies of Resident #1's medical records. Upon his own research with RP #3, he stated the cost was supposed to had been much lower. He had hoped the matter could be resolved so he could have attained the medical records at a reasonable cost. Interview on 7/17/2024 at 10:25 AM with RP #3 revealed the facility had charged inflated rates for Resident #1's medical record copies. RP #3 stated she researched Texas law and determined the rates for medical records were supposed to be a basic retrieval or processing fee, which must include the fee for providing the first 10 pages of the copies and which may not exceed $30; and a charge of $1.00 for the 11th through the 60th page; and .50 cents for the 61st through the 400th page. RP #3 wanted the discrepancy addressed and the facility to follow the guidance she discovered through her own research of Texas law. Interview on 7/17/2024 at 11:13 AM with the CCO revealed she was the Chief Compliance Officer for the facility's corporate offices. She stated the corporate offices followed the guidelines in THSC 241.154 when having determined reasonable cost for medical record copies; however, the invoice of cost provided to RP #2, dated 3/8/2024, for Resident #1's medical record copies was not correct. The CCO stated THSC 241.154 was utilized for the reasonable cost of medical records in the facility's Release of Medical Records Policy, dated January 2023. The THSC 241.154 was updated, on 5/27/2023, to reflect a reduction of reasonable cost, but the facility's Release of Medical Records Policy, dated January 2023, was not updated to reflect the new reasonable cost. Resident #1's medical record copies invoice, dated 3/8/2024, utilized calculations with the outdated version of THSC 241.154. The CCO stated the cost for Resident #1's medical record copies, calculated on the invoice on 3/8/2024, was based on an outdated THSC 241.154, prior to the 5/27/2023 update, and on the facility's Release of Medical Records Policy dated January 2023, which she should have reflected the update. She stated she discovered the discrepancy in April 2024 and updated the facility's Release of Medical Records Policy on 4/29/2024 to reflect the new THSC 241.154 guidelines for reasonable cost for medical records, effective 5/27/2023. The CCO stated the corporate offices did not reach out to RPs, who had requested copies of medical records between 05/27/2023 and 4/29/2024, to inform them they had been charged inflated prices. Interview on 7/17/2024 at 1:25 PM with MRC B revealed she took the position over as medical records coordinator about a month ago with a Release of Medical Records Policy, dated 4/29/2024. MRC B stated RP #2 or RP #3 had not contacted the facility to address the cost provided in the invoice, dated 3/8/2024, for Resident #1's medical record copies. MRC B stated she had no knowledge that the prices in the invoice, dated 3/8/2024, were calculated with prices from an outdated version of THSC 241.154, prior to 5/27/2023, or a non-updated facility policy, dated January 2023. MRC B stated the failure to have updated prices and an updated policy, at the time the medical records were requested on 2/12/2024, fell upon communication, not checking the policy, or verifying the prices. MRC B stated access to medical record was important for residents who needed to continue care elsewhere. As well, the inflated cost $116.28 was a lot of money and could have gone elsewhere for better use. Interview on 7/17/2024 at 1:37 PM with the CCO stated the costs associated with copies of medical records came from the corporate offices. The failure for the facility to have the correct information fell at the corporate level. There was a leadership change, and the failure was human error on behave of corporate. Safeguards in place to avoid this type of this failure were policy reviews and meetings with the compliance teams. The CCO stated the addition expenses for the medical records copies placed the requestor at risk for financial hardship. Interview on 7/17/2024 at 2:20 PM with the ADM revealed medical record release, and reasonable medical record release cost, were important for continued care. She expressed dissatisfaction the facility was being held responsible for a failure at the corporate level. Record review of the facility's Release of Medical Records Policy, dated January 2023, reflected basic retrieval and processing fee not to exceed $52.12 for the first 10 pages. $1.76 per page for pages 11-60.86 cents per page for pages 61-400.47 cents per page for any remaining. Record review of the facility's Release of Medical Records Policy, dated April 29, 2024, reflected basic retrieval and processing fee not to exceed $30.00 for the first 10 pages. $1.00 per page for pages 11-60.50 cents per page for pages 61-400.25 cents per page for any remaining.
Apr 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0558 (Tag F0558)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to be adequately equipped to allow residents to call f...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to be adequately equipped to allow residents to call for staff assistance through a communication system which relays the call directly to a centralized staff work area for 1 of 12 residents (Residents #5) reviewed for call lights. The facility failed to place Resident #5's call light within reach to call staff for assistance. This failure placed residents at risk for having their needs go unmet. Findings included: Record review of Resident #5's undated face sheet revealed an [AGE] year-old woman who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. She was diagnosed with Unspecified Dementia (which was a disease that affected memory, thought, and interfered with daily life;) Syncope and Collapse (which was also known as fainting;) and, Dyspnea (which was a condition that causes shortness of breath.) Record review of Resident #5's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], reflected Section C., Cognitive Patterns; Resident #5 had a BIMS Score of 00. A BIMS Score of 00 indicated Resident #5 had severe cognitive impairment. Section GG., Functional Abilities and (Range of Motion;) Resident had no impairment in either upper extremity (shoulder, elbow, wrist, and hand.) Resident had impairment on both sides of lower extremities (hip, knee, ankle, and foot.) Resident #5 utilized a wheelchair for mobility. Section GG., Functional Abilities and Goals (Self Care;) Resident #5 was dependent upon staff for toileting hygiene, shower/bathe self, and personal hygiene. Dependent meant the helper did all the effort. Section H., Bladder and Bowel (Bladder) indicated Resident #5 was always incontinent; (Bowl) indicated Resident #5 was always incontinent. Interview and observation on 4/23/2024 at 12:29 PM with Resident #5 revealed resident resting in her bed. Resident #5 did not respond to verbal introductions. Resident #5's bed was at a lower level of height; the back rest was slightly elevated. The call button clip, the call button, and the call button cord were on the floor to the resident's right side of body. The resident did not have access to the call light button because the call light button was further than arms reach. Observations on 4/25/2024 at 2:46 PM with Resident #5 revealed resident sleeping in her bed. The call button clip, the call button, and the call button cord were on the floor to the resident's right side of body. The resident did not have access to the call light button because the call light button was further than arms reach. Interview on 4/25/2024 at 2:49 PM with CNA A revealed she was a new employee and had been working at the facility for about 2-3 weeks. CNA A was trained to make sure the resident's call light was placed within arms reach after each resident contact. For example, the correct location of the cord would be with the resident in a chair or a bed. The location of the resident did not matter. CNA A performed room checks every 2 hours and to look for the call light's location and correct if needed. A resident's diagnosis, willingness to use the call light, or understanding the purpose for the call light did not negate the need for the call light to be within reach of the resident. Interview and observation on 4/25/2023 at 3:04 PM revealed CNA B exiting from Resident #5's room. CNA B stated he just performed his rounds for Resident #5. While performing rounds in Resident #5's room at 3:04 PM, he stated Resident #5's call light was located on the floor, out of reach of Resident #5, and that he placed the call light button in the correct location, within reach of Resident #5. He stated the call light was not in the correct position when he entered the room, a few moments ago. Interview on 4/25/2024 at 4:15 PM with the DON revealed staff was trained to place the resident's call light button within reach of each resident. If a staff member entered the room and noticed the call light out of reach of the resident, the call light button was supposed to be moved to the correct location, within arm's reach. Safeguards in place to make sure residents had access to their call light buttons was the use of angel rounds, which were daily room checks by administrative staff. Risks posed to a resident without access to their call button were falls, delayed assessments, and psychosocial harm. Interview on 4/25/2025 at 4:50 PM with the ADM revealed the facility had a policy for Answering the Call Ligh t and the policy stipulated the call light was supposed to be within reach of the resident. She expected her staff to follow the policy. There were no specific circumstances that would negate any resident from having or needing access to their call light button. Safeguards in place to ensure residents had access to their call lights were the policy and angel rounds. A resident without access to their call light button risked falls, lack of access to assistance, and frustration. Record review of the facility's [Answering the Call Light] policy, revised September 2003, reflected; (5) when the resident is in bed or confined to a chair be sure the call light is within easy reach of the resident.
Sept 2023 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for 1 of 7 residents (Res #1)...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for 1 of 7 residents (Res #1) reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to ensure CNA A did not verbally and physically abuse Resident #1 during ADL care. This failure placed residents at risk of abuse, decreased feelings of dignity, self-worth, and humiliation. Findings include: Record review on 9-20-2023 of the facility's face sheet reflected Res # 1 was born on [DATE] and was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Res # 1 was diagnosed with dementia and cognitive communication deficit. Record review on 9-20-2023 of a ring doorbell video clip, date stamped 6-22-2023 at 7:32:06 AM, reflected two CNAs, CNA A and CNA B, in Res # 1's room having performed ADL care. The video showed CNA A having stood over Res # 1 and having spoken to Res # 1 in an aggressive manner in response to Res # 1 attempted touching of CNA B's body. CNA A was viewed having restricted both of Res # 1's forearms and having aggressively told Res # 1 not to touch women like that. CNA A continued to speak to Res # 1 in an aggressive tone about touching people. CNA A stated that people don't like that. Res # 1 was heard telling CNA A to be quiet, which sparked CNA A having responded with you be quiet! CNA A then leaned forward towards Res # 1, which prompted Res # 1 to having raised their left arm to a defensive position. In response to Res # 1's arm being raised, CNA A threatened Res # 1 having stated, I wish you would, I wish you would, I want you to! When CNA A stated, I want you to, she raised her right hand in the air and shook their first 4 times in unison with the syllables, I want you to! CNA A continued to state, come on; do it! Res # 1 was overheard telling CNA A that she would be on the floor. In response to Res # 1's response, CNA A stated, no I won't, you're going to be on the floor. CNA A told Res # 1 they would call the police if Res # 1 struck them. CNA B was overheard having told Res #1 that the police would take him to jail. Interview on 9-20-2023 at 12:55 PM with the DON revealed a family of Res # 1, LAR # 1, contacted the facility on 6-22-2023 after LAR # 1 viewed the incident on the ring camera. LAR # 1sent the video to the DON and the previous ADM. The DON stated that they substantiated the abuse and non-reporting based on the video. The DON stated, the ADM and the DON, brought both CNA A and CNA B into the office and terminated them both. The DON stated she assessed Res # 1 to find no injuries. Interview on 9-20-2023 at 10:25 AM with LAR # 1 revealed CNA A spoke harshly to, and handled roughly, Res # 1 over an electronic monitoring video clip. LAR # 1 stated that they sent the video to the ADM to address the issue. LAR # 1 stated that Res # 1 most likely wouldn't remember the incident. She stated that he was diagnosed with dementia. Interview on 9-20-2023 at 1:20 PM with Res # 1 revealed that Res # 1 did not remember any incident where he was abused by staff. Res # 1 stated he feels safe at the facility. Record review on 9-20-2023 of CNA A's personnel file reflected CNA A was terminated from employment from the facility on 6-22-2023 for unprofessionalism and behavior. CNA A's date of hire was 4-14-2022. CNA attended ANE training on 4-14-2022, 8-3-2022, 2-28-2023, and 5-26-2023. CNA A received 1 hour of training on safeguarding residents' rights on 10-11-2022 and 4-29-2023.An Employee Misconduct Registry searches was performed on 4-27-2022. Record review on 9-20-2023 of CNA B's personnel file reflected CNA B was terminated from employment from the facility on 6-22-2023 for not reporting abuse, neglect, or exploitation. CNA B's date of hire was 3-16-2023. CNA A attended ANE training on 3-16-2023, and 5-26-2023. CNA B received 1 hour of training on safeguarding resident's rights on 4-5-2023. An Employee Misconduct Registry searches was performed on 3-14-2022. Record review of the facility's undated ANE policy indicated that suspected incidents of resident abuse, mistreatment, neglect, or injury of unknown source is reported. If the investigation revealed that the allegations are founded, the employee will be terminated.
Feb 2023 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Grievances (Tag F0585)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure Resident(s) have the right to voice grievance...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure Resident(s) have the right to voice grievances to the facility or other agency or entity that hears grievances without fear of discrimination or reprisal and the facility failed to make prompt efforts to resolve grievances for 1 of 2 residents (Residents # 9) reviewed for their right to voice grievances. The facility did not complete a grievance form and ensure a prompt resolution when a family member reported Resident #9's hearing aide was missing. This failure could place residents at risk for grievances not being addressed or resolved promptly. The findings include: Record review of the face sheet dated 02/23/23 reflected Resident #9 is a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis of altered mental status, hypertension (high blood pressure), hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol), heart failure and generalized weakness. Record review of MDS dated [DATE] reflected Resident #9's BIMS score was not conducted indicated that Resident's cognition assessment was not conducted. MDS reflected Resident #9 does wear have hearing aids, indicated moderate difficulty in hearing. Record review of the Care Plan dated 10/11/22 reflected Resident #9 had difficulty with hearing in both ears and had bilateral hearing aids with interventions of: Nurse to place hearing aids in a.m. and remove in the p.m. and keep on nurse's cart. Record review of grievances indicated no grievance form was completed for Resident #9's missing hearing aids. Observation and interview on 02/23/23 at 11:49 AM, Resident #9 was observed in a wheelchair without hearing aids and the surveyor had to increase in volume when speaking to Resident #9. Resident #9 stated her hearing aids would fall out of her ears at times and she cannot recall what happened to the hearing aids. Resident #9 stated she cannot afford to buy another hearing aid. Resident #9 stated the staff would help with placing the hearing aids on and would take the hearing aids away at nighttime. Observation and interview on 02/23/23 at 11:38 AM, LVN L stated Resident #9 used to wear hearing aids, but the hearing aids had been missing for about a month now and the family was aware. LVN L pulled out the top drawer of the medication cart and showed the empty box where the hearing aids were kept for safekeeping. LVN L stated Resident #9 had behaviors of misplacing her hearing aids and there were times staff would find the hearing aids inside the resident's room. LVN L stated she had informed the ADON about the missing hearing aids and therefore did not do a grievance form. Interview on 02/23/23 at 12:11 PM, ADON stated she was made aware of Resident # 9's hearing aids was missing during the morning meeting but could not recall when the meeting took place but stated the previous ADM was taking care of Resident #9's missing hearing aids therefore, she did not do a grievance form. ADON stated she remembered searching Resident #9's room thoroughly at the time it was informed it was beginning and checked with the kitchen to make sure the hearing aid did not end up in the kitchen. ADON stated the hearing aids were not found after the search. Interview on 02/23/23 at 12:18 PM, the DON stated she was aware of the missing hearing aids for Resident #9 months ago possibly in November of 2022, when the previous ADM was still employed. DON stated during the morning meeting months ago, cannot recall the exact date, the missing hearing aid was mentioned, and staff had searched everywhere, and the previous ADM talked to the resident's family. After the previous ADM left on January 3rd of 2023, DON had received the call sometime in January of 2023 from Resident #9's RP who stated concern of the missing hearing aids. DON stated RP had requested to talk to a higher-up than the DON. DON contacted and made VP aware of RP's concern. DON stated she had not heard back from the VP or RP. DON stated she did not write a grievance form because the concern was an old problem that had existed before. DON stated she did not check with SW to find out if a grievance was filed but rather assumed a grievance was filed. Interview on 02/23/23 at 11:54 AM, the ADM stated he had been newly employed with the facility and was not aware of Resident #9's missing hearing aids. ADM stated there should have been a grievance form on the concern. ADM stated everyone can start the process of filling out the grievance form and it was brought up during morning meeting. Interview on 02/23/23 at 12:43 PM, LSW stated usually whoever received the complaint initiated the grievance form and then it got assigned to the managers. LSW stated there should have been a grievance form for Resident #9's missing hearing aids. LSW stated the previous ADM was responsible for the grievance form at that time and with the new ADM in place LSW was responsible for the grievance form. LSW stated the previous ADM had stated not to initiate a grievance form for Resident #9's missing hearing aids because the facility was not required to replace the item. LSW stated with the new ADM, they were required to do a grievance form on any missing items whether the items needed to be replaced or not. LSW stated the impact of not having the grievance form filed for Resident #9's missing hearing aids would be a lack of understanding and miscommunication. During an interview on 02/23/23 at 12:51 PM, the VP stated he was made aware during the first week of January 2023 by the DON that Resident #9's RP had called the facility with concerns. VP stated he had informed the DON of the hours he would be in the facility and that he preferred for RP to be talked to in person. VP stated he also provided a contact number to the DON for RP to be called. VP stated he did not connect with the RP. VP stated he checked back with the DON a week later and it was reported that his contact number was given to the RP. VP stated Resident #9's missing hearing aids should have been on a grievance form and the impact of not filing a grievance would be Resident #9 not being able to hear well. VP stated the facility tried to search for the missing items and the facility was not accountable to replace the hearing aids if the resident had behaviors of misplacing the hearing aids. Record review of the facility's policy titled, Filing Grievances/complaints dated February 2017 reflected: Our facility will assist residents, resident's individual representatives (sponsors), other interested family members, or resident advocates in filing grievances or complaints when such requests are made. Record review of the facility's policy titled, Investigating Grievances/Complaints dated February 2017 reflected: Our facility investigates all grievances and complaints filed with the facility.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pharmacy Services (Tag F0755)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the need of 1 (Resident#336) of 4 residents reviewed for pharmacy services. 1.MA (A) administered Ketorolac Sol 0.5% 1 drop to both right and left eye, instead of following order which stated to give 1 drop to right eye only. These failure placed residents at risk for inadequate therapeutic outcomes, ineffective disease management and a decline in health. The findings included: Review of Resident #336's face sheet, dated 2/23/2023 revealed an [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnosis: Unspecified atrial fibrillation (Irregular Heart Rhythm), Type 2 diabetes mellitus with unspecified complications, Nonexudative age-related macular degeneration ( an eye diseases affecting a specific part of inner eyewall ) , Atherosclerosis (buildup of fat and other substance on the artery walls) , Allergy, Pneumonia, Essential (primary) Hypertension, weakness, and Alcoholic cirrhosis of liver. Review of Resident # 336's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] reflected it was still in process and not completed. Review of Resident #336's Physician order dated 02/20/2023 revealed an order for Ketorolac 0.5% OPHTH Solution 1 drop into the right eye QID. Observation on 02/23/2023 at 8:30AM, revealed MA (A) administered Ketorolac Sol 0.5% 1 drop to both of Resident #336's eyes (Right & Left).The medication label stated to administer in the Right eye only for resident # 336. During an interview on 02/23/2023 at 8:40AM, MA (A) stated that she thought the order for the medication stated to administer in both right and left eyes. MA (A) stated that she was nervous and misread the order for resident #336. MA (A) stated that she had received in-service by nursing management on how to administer eye drops properly. MA (A) stated that resident #336 could have an adverse reaction by receiving the wrong medication. During an interview on 02/23/2023 at 10:15AM, the DON stated that adverse effect of the act of MA (A) could be the resident not receiving the correct medication as prescribed per physician orders, or not receiving the full dose of medication. DON stated that this is considered a medication error and she will contact the physician to inform of error for adverse reaction. Also, DON stated that an in-service would be performed for eye drop administration. Review of facility policy titled Instillation of Eye Drops dated 03/24/2022, revealed 1) Review the resident's care plan to assess for any special needs of the resident. 2) Report other information in accordance with facility policy and professional standards of practice. Review of facility policy titled Administering Medication dated 03/23/2023, Policy Statement reflected Medications shall be administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. 3) Medications must be administered in accordance with the orders, including any required time frame. 4) If a dosage is believed to be inappropriate or excessive for a resident, or a medication has been identified as having potential adverse consequences for the resident or is suspected of being associated with adverse consequences, the person preparing or administering the medication shall contact the resident's Attending Physician or the facility's Medical Director to discuss the concerns.
Dec 2022 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0921)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortab...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public for one hall (400 hall) of four halls and one PPE storage room of two PPE storage rooms reviewed for physical environment, in that: The facility failed to: A.) ensure the damaged/stained ceiling in the 400 hall was repaired or replaced. B.) ensure the damaged/stained ceiling in the 300-hall storage room was repaired or replaced. These failures could affect residents, staff, and the public by placing them at risk for diminished quality of life due to the lack of a well-kept environment. Findings included: Observation on 12/16/2022 at 9:50 am, revealed the ceiling of the 400-hall had large brown stains on it between room [ROOM NUMBER] and room [ROOM NUMBER]. Observation on 12/16/2022 at 10:13 am revealed the ceiling of the storage room on the 300-hall had a black spotted substance and stains on the ceiling between the light fixture and the sprinkler head. There were boxes of documents stored on a pallet in the corner, boxes and bins of PPE including, N95 masks, surgical masks; Jevity dietary supplement, lotion, and other supplies Interview on 12/16/2022 at 10:15 am, CNA 1 stated the ceiling in the storage room had the black spotted substance on it since she started 6 months ago. CNA 1 stated she did not bring this to anyone's attention because she thought they already knew since it was like that when she started. CNA 1 stated she was told there was a flood down in this room prior to her coming to work at the facility. CNA 1 stated there is a process for reporting things that need to be fixed or repaired but she did not report the black spotted substance on the ceiling because she thought they already knew about it. CNA 1 stated the storage room on the 300 hall was the overflow storage room for all the PPE and hygiene supplies, but other items are stored there as well. Interview on 12/16/2022 at 10:18 am, Maintenance Director (MTD) stated he had been in and out of the storage room on the 300-hall and had not noticed the ceiling. He stated the previous AD told him there had been a flood down at this end of the hall but that happened before he started working at this facility 9 months ago. He stated room [ROOM NUMBER], next door to the storage room, had been flooded and it was still being renovated and repaired from the flood. Interview on 12/16/2022 at 10:25 am, Administrator (AD) stated he was unaware of the black substance on the ceiling in the storage room. AD stated they would move the PPE stored in this room to another location. He stated, it looks like mold, and I have concerns about it. Interview on 12/16/2022 at 11:00 am, AD stated they were in the process of moving the PPE from the storage room on the 300-hall to another locked room on the same hall. He stated he had no idea how long the ceiling had been like that in the 300-hall storage room. Interview on 12/16/2022 at 12:06 pm, AD stated they have a maintenance book where any issues with the facility can be recorded by any staff. AD stated he conducts monthly Quality Assurance (QA) meetings and one thing he always reviews with his staff is to be sure to report anything that has not already been covered in their QA meeting. Interview on 12/16/2022 at 12:45 pm, AD stated they had completed an inspection of all resident rooms in the facility and found no evidence of any leaks in the ceilings or black substances. AD was shown a picture of the stained ceiling on the 400-hall, and he stated he was not aware that the stains were there but would check with his MTD. Interview on 12/16/2022 at 2:10 pm, AD stated he was aware there had been a leak on the 400-hall but did not know what happened. AD stated he has been at the facility for 9 months and he did a hand off with the previous AD and neither of those issues were discussed referring to the flood on the 300-hall and the leak on the 400-hall. Interview on 12/16/2022 at 3:00 pm, AD stated that staff was trained on reporting maintenance concerns, it's covered in orientation, it's in the handbook and we in-service on it. AD further stated it is his expectation that staff will use the maintenance logbook at the nurses' station to report any maintenance concerns but that the logbook is not inclusive of everything that needs to be repaired and acknowledged that some requests are passed on to MTD verbally or by phone/text. Interview on 12/16/2022 at 3:30 pm, MTD stated the facility had a bunch of leaks in the roof/attic on the sprinkler system and they fixed about 35 feet of it. MTD stated, a couple of months ago there was a really bad one (on the 400-hall) and it flooded the hallway and we had to move a bunch of residents and call an outside contractor to come in and fix it. MTD stated it happened over night and they called him; the facility had a company come in and clean the carpets and test for mold but he has not been able to get down there to paint it, referring to the 400-hall ceiling. MTD further stated he was not aware about the storage room on the 300-hall. MTD stated he was in and out of that room and I don't have time to look up. MTD stated, all I know is, it was a sprinkler because the previous AD told me when I started. MTD stated he does not recall anyone telling him about the black substance on the ceiling in the storage room on the 300-hall. MTD further stated the staff is supposed to write down anything that needs to be repaired or replaced in the maintenance logbook which sits at the nurses' station. MTD stated, first thing I do each morning is check the maintenance logbook, then I go to the morning meeting and get report. MTD stated he often gets told things in the meeting or throughout the day that are not put in the maintenance logbook. MTD stated he does not remember seeing the ceiling in the 300-hall storage room or the ceiling in the 400-hall written in the logbook for repair and does not recall anyone telling him about it. Review of the Maintenance Logbook and its entries, undated, from current date back to November of 2021 reflected no entries for the 300-hall storage room ceiling or 400-hall ceiling. Review of facility policy Work Orders, Maintenance dated revised April 2010, reflected the policy statement: Maintenance work orders shall be completed in order to establish a priority of maintenance services. The policy further reflected 1) In order to establish a priority of maintenance service, work orders must be filled out and forwarded to the Maintenance Director; 2) It shall be the responsibility of the department directors to fill out and forward such work orders to the Maintenance Director; 3) A supply of work orders is maintained at each nurses' station; 4) work order requests should be placed in the appropriate file basket at the nurses' station. Work orders are picked up daily; 5) Emergency requests will be given priority in making necessary repairs.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
  • "What safeguards are in place to prevent abuse and neglect?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: Federal abuse finding, 5 life-threatening violation(s). Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 15 deficiencies on record, including 5 critical (life-threatening) violations. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
  • • $18,259 in fines. Above average for Texas. Some compliance problems on record.
  • • Grade F (0/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: This facility has a substantiated abuse finding. Extreme caution advised. Explore alternatives.

About This Facility

What is Woodway Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns WOODWAY REHABILITATION AND HEALTHCARE CENTER an overall rating of 1 out of 5 stars, which is considered much below average nationally. Within Texas, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.

How is Woodway Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center Staffed?

CMS rates WOODWAY REHABILITATION AND HEALTHCARE CENTER's staffing level at 1 out of 5 stars, which is much below average compared to other nursing homes.

What Have Inspectors Found at Woodway Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center?

State health inspectors documented 15 deficiencies at WOODWAY REHABILITATION AND HEALTHCARE CENTER during 2022 to 2025. These included: 5 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death) and 10 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.

Who Owns and Operates Woodway Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center?

WOODWAY REHABILITATION AND HEALTHCARE CENTER is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by MOMENTUM SKILLED SERVICES, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 144 certified beds and approximately 72 residents (about 50% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in WACO, Texas.

How Does Woodway Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center Compare to Other Texas Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Texas, WOODWAY REHABILITATION AND HEALTHCARE CENTER's overall rating (1 stars) is below the state average of 2.8 and health inspection rating (1 stars) is much below the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Woodway Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "What safeguards and monitoring systems are in place to protect residents from abuse or neglect?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations, the substantiated abuse finding on record, and the below-average staffing rating.

Is Woodway Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, WOODWAY REHABILITATION AND HEALTHCARE CENTER has documented safety concerns. The facility has 1 substantiated abuse finding (meaning confirmed case of resident harm by staff or other residents). Inspectors have issued 5 Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 1-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Texas. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.

Do Nurses at Woodway Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center Stick Around?

WOODWAY REHABILITATION AND HEALTHCARE CENTER has not reported staff turnover data to CMS. Staff turnover matters because consistent caregivers learn residents' individual needs, medications, and preferences. When staff frequently change, this institutional knowledge is lost. Families should ask the facility directly about their staff retention rates and average employee tenure.

Was Woodway Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center Ever Fined?

WOODWAY REHABILITATION AND HEALTHCARE CENTER has been fined $18,259 across 2 penalty actions. This is below the Texas average of $33,261. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.

Is Woodway Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center on Any Federal Watch List?

WOODWAY REHABILITATION AND HEALTHCARE CENTER is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.