WELLS LTC NURSING & REHABILITATION

46 MAY STREET, WELLS, TX 75976 (936) 867-4707
For profit - Limited Liability company 90 Beds GULF COAST LTC PARTNERS Data: November 2025 8 Immediate Jeopardy citations
Trust Grade
0/100
#1150 of 1168 in TX
Last Inspection: September 2024

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Wells LTC Nursing & Rehabilitation has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns about the quality of care provided, placing it in the poor category. It ranks #1150 of 1168 facilities in Texas, meaning it is in the bottom half of all nursing homes in the state, and #6 out of 6 in Cherokee County, suggesting there are no better local options available. While the facility is showing improvement, reducing issues from 7 to 4 over the past year, it still faces serious problems, including 34 total deficiencies found during inspections, with 8 being critical incidents involving resident abuse due to inadequate staffing. Although staffing is a relative strength with a 4/5 star rating and a turnover rate of 51%, which is average, the nursing staff's coverage is concerning, being less than 95% of Texas facilities, and the facility has incurred $244,527 in fines, indicating repeated compliance issues. Specific incidents include failures to prevent resident-to-resident abuse, such as one resident being pushed and fracturing a toe, and another resident being hit in the head, all due to insufficient supervision.

Trust Score
F
0/100
In Texas
#1150/1168
Bottom 2%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Getting Better
7 → 4 violations
Staff Stability
⚠ Watch
51% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
Penalties
○ Average
$244,527 in fines. Higher than 69% of Texas facilities. Some compliance issues.
Skilled Nurses
⚠ Watch
Each resident gets only 12 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Texas. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
Violations
⚠ Watch
34 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Overall Rating
★★★★☆
4.0
Staff Levels
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Care Quality
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2024: 7 issues
2025: 4 issues

The Good

  • 4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in staffing levels, fire safety.

The Bad

1-Star Overall Rating

Below Texas average (2.8)

Significant quality concerns identified by CMS

Staff Turnover: 51%

Near Texas avg (46%)

Higher turnover may affect care consistency

Federal Fines: $244,527

Well above median ($33,413)

Significant penalties indicating serious issues

Chain: GULF COAST LTC PARTNERS

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

The Ugly 34 deficiencies on record

8 life-threatening 1 actual harm
Sept 2025 3 deficiencies 3 IJ (3 affecting multiple)
CRITICAL (K) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents the right to be free from abuse and neglect for 8 ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents the right to be free from abuse and neglect for 8 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #5, Resident #6, Resident #7 and Resident #8) of 8 residents reviewed for abuse and neglect.The facility neglected to ensure enough staff to monitor the residents in the male secure unit which lead to the resident-to-resident abuse.The facility failed to prevent Resident #2 from abusing Resident #1 on 6/25/2025 when Resident #2 pushed Resident #1 down on the floor causing a fracture to the left 5th toe. The facility failed to prevent Resident #5 from abusing Resident #3 on 7/13/2025 when Resident #5 hit Resident #3 in the head twice.The facility failed to prevent Resident #4 from abusing Resident #3 on 7/30/2025 when Resident #4 slapped Resident #3 on the right side of the face from behind.The facility failed to prevent Resident #6 from abusing Resident #5 on 8/28/2025 when Resident #6 hit Resident #5 in the face.The facility failed to prevent Resident #7 from sexually abusing Resident #8 on 9/02/2025 causing Resident #8 to be admitted to the hospital. An IJ was identified on 9/03/2025. The IJ template was provided to the facility on 9/03/2025 at 3:36 PM. While the IJ was removed on 9/04/2025, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of pattern and a severity level of no actual harm with a potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems. This failure could place all residents in the facility at risk for injuries, hospitalization and severe negative psychosocial outcomes which could prevent them from achieving their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being.Findings Included: 1.Record review of Resident #1's facility's electronic face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses include Alzheimer's Disease with history of psychotic disorder (problem with thinking and delusions), and Hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol). Record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 00 (resident is rarely to never understood), indicating she was severely cognitive impaired. She required supervision to limited assistance with one person assist for dressing, toilet use, personal hygiene and required supervision with ambulation. Record review of Resident #1's care plan dated 03/14/2025 revealed Resident #1 is an elopement risk/wanderer as evidenced by impaired safety awareness, with interventions that included, distract resident from wandering by offering pleasant diversions, structured, activities, food, conversation, television, book. 2.Record review of Resident #2's facility's electronic face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses include dementia with, severe, with other behavioral disturbance, delusional disorders, major depressive, lack of coordination, anxiety disorder and age-related cognitive disorder. Record review of Resident #2's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 00 (resident is rarely to never understood), indicating she was severely cognitive impaired. She required supervision to limited assistance with one person assist for dressing, toilet use, personal hygiene and required supervision with ambulation. Record review of Resident #2's care plan dated 01/03/2025 revealed Resident #2 is an elopement risk/wanderer as evidenced by impaired safety awareness, with interventions that included, distract resident from wandering by offering pleasant diversions, structured activities, food, conversation, television, book. Record review of Resident #1 and #2's incident report dated 06/25/2025 revealed the incident description that Resident #1 was standing over Resident #2 who was sitting on the couch. Resident #1 said something to Resident #2 and resident # 2 shoved Resident #1 causing her to fall. Both residents were assessed for injuries. A skin tear to the left elbow and a raised area was noted to the left side of resident #1's head. An xray revealed age indetermination fifth digit proximal phalanx head fracture (fracture to left fifth toe) for resident #1. Record review of witness statement from CNA F dated 6/25/2025 revealed on the day of 6/25/2025. I saw [Resident #2] push [Resident #1], causing [Resident #1] to fall down. [Resident #2] was brought to the nurse's station and sat there during the process of notifying the psych doctor and then was placed on Q15 monitoring. During an interview on 9/4/2025 at 11:49 AM with RN L she said she had worked with Resident #1 and Resident #2, in the past and was not at work during the time of the incident between Resident #1 and Resident #2. She said Resident #1 was on hospice and not aggressive and was mostly bedridden. She said Resident #2 was normally not aggressive and to push someone was out of her normal character . 3. Record review of Resident #3's facility's electronic face sheet revealed an [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included: Dementia (progressive decline in cognitive abilities, such as memory, thinking, reasoning, and judgment), cognitive communication deficit (difficulty communicating), Alzheimer's disease (memory loss, confusion, and other cognitive decline). Record review of Resident #3's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 09, indicating he was moderately cognitive impaired. He required partial to substantial assist for dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene and required partial/moderate with walking. Section E of the MDS indicated Resident #3 had not had any behaviors. Record review of Resident #3's care plan dated 7/13/2025 indicated Resident #3 had a psychosocial wellbeing problem potential related to being hit in the face 2 times by Resident #5 on 7/13/2025 with interventions that included: residents separated and both placed on 1:1 (1 staff member to 1 resident) monitoring, assessed both residents for injury, emotional distress, and neuros for 72 hours, moved other resident to a room on another hall with continued 1:1 monitoring, Psych MD and both RPs notified, gathered witness statements from staff and both residents, BIMS done on both residents, started in-services on Abuse/Neglect and Resident to resident altercations. When conflict arises, remove residents to a calm safe environment and allow to vent/share feelings. Record review of Resident #3's care plan dated 7/30/2025 indicated Resident #3 had a psychosocial wellbeing problem potential related 7/30/2025 being slapped by Resident #4. Resident #3 backed his wheelchair into Resident #4 and when he moved his wheelchair forward Resident #4 slapped him from behind with interventions that included: Resident #4 placed on 1:1 monitoring, Resident #3 referred to Psych services. Both residents assessed for injuries and will be monitored for delayed injuries, none found in initial assessment. Psych MD and both RPs notified. Both residents assessed form emotional distress for 72 hours. In-services provided on Abuse/Neglect and resident to resident altercation. Record review of a progress note for Resident #3 dated 7/13/2025 at 4:50 PM written by LVN D indicated Resident #3's nurse was notified by staff that roommate Resident #5 had hit him twice in the head. He reported no injuries noted, no acute distress and no discomfort noted. The residents were separated, 1:1 monitoring initiated and every 15-minute monitoring, neuros initiated by the nurse and all parties were notified by nurse and RN. Record review of a progress note for Resident #3 dated 7/30/2025 at 5:53 PM written by LVN E indicated Resident #3 was sitting in the dining room at his table when Resident #4 hit him in the head from behind. Record review of a facility incident report dated 7/13/2025 at 4:25 PM indicated Resident #3 was physically hit twice in the head by his roommate Resident #5. An assessment was completed by his nurse and no injuries were noted and no pain or discomfort was noted. Record review of a facility incident report dated 7/30/2025 at 5:00 PM indicated Resident #3 was hit in the head from behind by Resident #4. Redirected other resident away from this resident, placed other resident on 1:1 monitoring. 4. Record review of Resident #4's facility's electronic face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included: Dementia (progressive decline in cognitive abilities, such as memory, thinking, reasoning, and judgment), cognitive communication deficit (difficulty communicating), bipolar disorder (mood swings ranging from depressive lows to manic highs). Record review of Resident #4's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 06, indicating he was severely cognitively impaired. He was dependent or required substantial to maximal assist for dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene. Section E of the MDS indicated Resident #4 had not had any behaviors. Record review of Resident #4's care plan dated 5/01/2025 and revised on 8/14/2025 indicated Resident #4 had demonstrated physical behaviors and hit another male resident in the face. Interventions included: Residents separated, Resident #4 placed on 1:1 monitoring, and Resident #3 was placed on Q15 monitoring. Both residents were assessed for injuries and will be monitored for delayed injuries, none found in initial assessment. Psych MD and both RPs notified. Both residents were assessed for emotional distress for 72 hours. Witness statements gathered from staff. In-services provided on Abuse/Neglect and resident to resident altercations. Record review of a progress note for Resident #4 dated 7/30/2025 at 5:21 PM written by LVN E indicated the resident was witnessed hitting other resident on the right side of their head from behind while attempting to come in back door. Psych MD notified and received new order to send to inpatient facility. Record review of a progress note for Resident #4 dated 7/30/2025 at 6:00 PM written by LVN E indicated the resident was placed 1 on 1 with housekeeping sitting with the resident at that time. Record review of a progress note for Resident #4 dated 7/31/2025 at 11:07 AM written by LVN E indicated the behavioral hospital was at the facility to pick the resident up. Record review of facility incident report dated 7/30/2025 at 5:00 PM indicated Resident #4 was witnessed hitting Resident #3 on the right side of his head from behind while attempting to go out the back door of the dining room to the smoking area. Resident #4 was redirected away from Resident #3 and out onto open floor with nurse so he could be 1 to 1 at that time. During a confidential interview on an undisclosed date and time the interviewee said on 7/30/2025 Resident #4 was trying to go outside, and Resident #3 was fussing at Resident #4 to not go outside and backed his wheelchair up and into Resident #4 and that was when Resident #4 slapped Resident #3 on the right side of the face from behind. During an interview on 9/04/2025 at 1:10 PM the ADON said Resident #4 had a history of physical aggression. She said prior to the incident with Resident #3, Resident #4 had hit his previous roommate because their wheelchairs had got tangled up. She said Resident #4 had gone out to a behavior hospital for that incident and had not had any aggressive behaviors since that time. She said on 7/30/2025 Resident #3 and Resident #4 were by the back door and Resident #3 backed his wheelchair up and into Resident #4's wheelchair and Resident #4 slapped Resident #3 on the right side of his face from behind. She said Resident #3 had not any incidents of verbal aggression prior to the incident. 5. Record review of Resident #5's facility's electronic face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the most recent admission on [DATE]. Diagnoses included: Dementia (progressive decline in cognitive abilities, such as memory, thinking, reasoning, and judgment), major depressive disorder (feelings of sadness, loss of interest, and other symptoms that interfere with daily life), bipolar disorder (mood swings ranging from depressive lows to manic highs). Record review of Resident #5's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score was not completed due to Resident #5 was rarely/never understood. He required partial to moderate assist for dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene and was independent with walking . Section E of the MDS indicated Resident #5 had verbal behavioral symptoms directed toward others (threatening others, screaming at others, cursing at others), other behavioral symptoms not directed at others (physical symptoms such as hitting or scratching self, pacing, rummaging, public sexual acts, disrobing in public, throwing or smearing food or bodily wastes, or verbal/vocal symptoms like screaming). Record review of Resident #5's care plan dated 7/13/2025 indicated Resident #5 had potential to demonstrate physical behaviors related to dementia, poor impulse control. Resident #5 hit another resident 2 times in the face on 7/13/2025 with interventions that included: residents separated and both placed on 1:1 monitoring, assessed both residents for injury, emotional distress, and neuros for 72 hours, moved this resident to a room on another hall with continued 1:1 monitoring, Psych MD and both RPs notified, gathered witness statements from staff and both residents, BIMS done on both residents, started in-services on Abuse/Neglect and Resident to resident altercations. Record review of a progress note for Resident #5 dated 7/13/2025 at 4:35 PM written by LVN D indicated the nurse was notified by the CNA that the resident hit his roommate twice in the head and then had a shoe and was going to hit another resident but was redirected by the nurse> All parties were notified. The resident was placed on 1:1 and every 15-minute monitoring and separated. Record review of facility incident report for Resident #5 dated 7/13/2025 at 4:25 PM completed by LVN D indicated: Notified by the CNA Resident #5 hit roommate in the head twice and had a shoe in his hand. The resident was redirected. Resident #5 was assessed by the nurse no and issues were noted. Resident #5 was redirected by the nurse and placed on 1:1 monitoring. During an interview on 9/02/2025 at 10:20 AM CNA B said most days she was on the male secure unit as the only CNA. She said on the day of the incident were Resident #5 hit Resident #3 she was on the male secure unit as the only CNA. She said Resident #3 had wandered into Resident #5's room and Resident #5 hit Resident #3 in the middle of his forehead with a closed fist 2 times. She said she separated Resident #5 and Resident #3 and went and got the nurse. She said Resident #6 had been aggressive to both Resident #3 and Resident #5. She said it had been reported to the ADON and the DON multiple times by nothing had been done. She said the nurse came to the male secured unit while the nurse was making her round or when she was asked to come in by the CNA but that was the only time the nurse was on the male secure unit. She said MA M was on the male secured unit only while MA M was passing out medications. 6. Record review of Resident #6's facility's electronic face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included: schizoaffective disorder (hallucinations and delusions and mood disorder symptoms), major depressive disorder (feelings of sadness, loss of interest, and other symptoms that interfere with daily life), and anxiety (excessive and persistent worry, fear, and nervousness that can interfere with daily life). Record review of Resident #6's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS 06 score which indicated severe cognitive impairment. He was independent for dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene and was independent with walking. Section E of the MDS indicated Resident #6 had verbal behavioral symptoms directed toward others (threatening others, screaming at others, cursing at others), other behavioral symptoms not directed at others (physical symptoms such as hitting or scratching self, pacing, rummaging, public sexual acts, disrobing in public, throwing or smearing food or bodily wastes, or verbal/vocal symptoms like screaming). Record review of Resident #6's care plan dated 8/27/2025 indicated Resident #6 required psychotropic medications with interventions that included: Monitor/record occurrence of target behavior symptoms (specify: pacing, wandering, disrobing, inappropriate response to verbal communication, violence/aggression towards staff/others, etc.) and document per facility protocol. The care plan did not address behaviors prior to the incident. Record review of a progress note for Resident #6 dated 8/27/2025 at 12:00 AM written by FNP G indicated: Phone note change of condition: Nursing staff requested to address a documented psychiatric issue of concern that requires a timely evaluation and medical intervention. Symptoms included: verbal disruptions, threatening, yelling, hostility towards others, impulsive behavior, initiation of fights, highly irritable, physical aggression towards others, socially inappropriate behavior, verbal aggression, patient is targeting 2 specific male residents, trying to hit them, starting fights, unable to redirect. Record review of a progress note for Resident #6 dated 8/28/2025 at 12:00 AM written by FNP G indicated: Phone note change of condition: Nursing staff request to address a documented psychiatric issue of concern that requires a timely evaluation and medical intervention. Symptoms included: Hostility towards others, impulsive behavior, highly irritable, nurse reports that the resident continues to try and hit at a fellow male resident, staff is concerned that the resident may harm others and or himself, staff requesting the resident be sent out to an inpatient psych hospital. Record review of a facility behavior nurses note dated 8/27/2025 at 4:45 PM written by the ADON indicated Resident #6 had been verbally aggressive and targeting a specific resident, balling up fists, acting like he would hit the resident. The resident was redirected. Record review of a facility behavior nurses note dated 8/28/2025 at 11:55 AM written by the ADON indicated: Resident #6 had been verbally aggressive and targeting a specific resident, balling up fists, acting like he would hit the resident. The resident was redirected and placed 1:1 supervision. During a confidential interview on an undisclosed date and time the interviewee said Resident #6 was a recent admission from the behavioral hospital and said he came to the facility aggressive. She said Resident #6 had been bullying Resident #5 since he admitted 2 days prior to the incident. She said on 8/28/2025 Resident #5 was sitting at the table in the dining room and Resident #6 walked over to Resident #5 and hit him with a balled-up fist to the right side of the face and chin area. She said Resident #5 did not have any redness or bruising where he was hit. She said when the incident occurred, she was trying to keep a fall risk resident from falling. She said she felt like if there was a second CNA in the male secure unit the incident may have been to be prevented. During an interview on 9/2/2025 at 12:20 PM the DON said CNA A facetime called her and showed her how Resident #6 was acting. She said she then ordered Resident #6 to be placed on 1:1 monitoring. She said it was not a video that was sent to her, but it was an actual in real time facetime call. She said she does not allow videos of residents on her phone and said if there was a recorded video then Resident #6 must have attempted to hit Resident #5 more than once. During a confidential interview on an undisclosed date and time the interviewee said she had taken a video of how Resident #6 had been acting and sent the video via text message to the DON. She said she took the video as desperation to get more help on the male secure unit. Observation of a video on 9/02/2025 at 12:32 PM on 9/02/2025 at 12:32 PM taken on 8/28/2025 revealed Resident #5 was sitting at a table in the dining room of the male secure unit, and Resident #6 then walked over to Resident #5 and began attempting to hit Resident #5 multiple times. During an interview on 9/02/2025 at 1:14 PM Housekeeper O said on 8/28/2025 she saw Resident #5 and Resident #6 having a verbal altercation. She said Resident #6 balled up his fists, so she got in between the 2 residents. She said there was only 1 CNA on the male secure unit that day and she was in a room providing care to another resident when the incident she saw occurred. She said she never saw Resident #6 actually make contact with Resident #5 at that time. During an interview on 9/04/2025 at 1:10 PM the ADON said on 8/27/2025 the CNAs had reported to her that Resident #6 was targeting and taunting Resident #5 by acting like he was angry with Resident #5 and attempting to hit him. She said she notified to psych doctor and received an order to increase his medication. She said on 8/28/2025 she was the nurse working on the male secured unit and said CNA A reported to her that Resident #6 was being physically aggressive to Resident #5. She said she brought Resident #6 outside of the male secured unit to the nurse's station and kept him there until he discharged to the behavior hospital. She said Resident #6 was still at the behavioral hospital at the time of the interview. She said Resident #6 was still at the behavioral hospital at the time of the interview. During an interview on 9/04/2025 at 2:07 PM the DON said on 8/28/2025 CNA A was the only CNA on male secure unit that day. She said the ADON was the nurse for the male secure unit that day and reported to her that Resident #6 was becoming more aggressive and told her she had already notified the psych doctor and received the medication increase order and asked if she could put Resident #6 on 1:1 monitoring. She said it was never reported to her that Resident #6 had hit Resident #5. She said she had questioned herself if Resident #6 was appropriate for their male secure unit due to his aggressive behaviors. She said Resident #6 discharged to the behavior hospital on 8/28/2025. During an interview on 9/04/2025 at 3:07 PM the Administrator said it was never reported to her that Resident #6 had been physically aggressive to Resident #5. She said it was reported to her that Resident #6 had been sent out to the hospital, but she did not know it was a behavior hospital. She said it was after surveyor entrance that she read the 24-hour report that she discovered Resident #6 had been sent out to a behavioral hospital. She said they did normally discuss where residents were sent out to in the morning meetings, but she had taken a day off work and was not in the morning meeting the day after Resident #6 had been sent out. She said after she found out Resident #6 had been sent to a behavior hospital; she did not question anyone as to why he was sent to a behavior hospital. She said on 9/03/2025 after surveyors entrance it was discussed with the DON that she must be notified of any resident-to-resident altercations. 7. Record review of Resident #7's facility's electronic face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included: Dementia (progressive decline in cognitive abilities, such as memory, thinking, reasoning, and judgment), major depressive disorder (feelings of sadness, loss of interest, and other symptoms that interfere with daily life), and seizures. Record review of Resident #7's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS 09 score which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. He was dependent for dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene and did not attempt walking. Section E of the MDS indicated Resident #7 had not had any behavioral symptoms. Record review of Resident #7's care plan dated 7/15/2025 indicated Resident #7 had behaviors: Sexually inappropriate as evidenced by previous inappropriate behaviors. On 8/11/2025 vulgar, inappropriate comments to nurse during care. On 8/14/2025 sexually inappropriate comments to nurse. Interventions included: Male secure unit, listen/talk to the resident-see if they will tell you why they do the behavior, psychiatric services consult as needed, staff to be in-serviced on behavioral approaches designed to effectively manage unacceptable sexual advances, staff will be trained to respond, but not react to resident's behavior. Record review of Resident #7's care plan dated 9/02/2025 indicated Resident #7 had engaged in physical touch of a sexual nature toward another resident with interventions that included: Avoid leaving resident unsupervised in situations where inappropriate contact may occur, identify and document triggers or patterns leading to inappropriate behaviors, immediately intervene report and document inappropriate sexual contact, resident immediately placed on 1:1 supervision. Record review of a progress note for Resident #7 dated 9/02/2025 at 2:45 AM written by the Administrator indicated: the resident was involved in a resident-to-resident incident approximately 2:30 AM. The resident was placed on 1-on-1 monitoring and will be referred to psych services. Record review of a facility incident report for Resident #7 dated 9/02/2025 at 1:30 AM completed by LVN J indicated: this nurse entered residents' room at approximately 1:30 AM and found this Resident #7 lying on the right side behind Resident #8 facing the window. Observed Resident #7 having sexual intercourse with Resident #8. Upon entering and discovering Resident #7 removed penis and both residents remained lying quietly. This nurse requested help from CNA K to remove Resident #7 from behind Resident #8 and separate them so assessments and investigation of incident could be performed. Resident #7 verbalized that he knew what he had done and said this incident was the first time. When questioned further Resident #7 began stating he was sad after the recent loss of his son and did not want to discuss any further. Resident #7 requested medication for anxiety and nerves. This nurse medicated Resident #7. 8. Record review of Resident #8's facility's electronic face sheet revealed an [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included: Dementia (progressive decline in cognitive abilities, such as memory, thinking, reasoning, and judgment), psychotic disorder with delusions due to known physiological condition (false beliefs), cognitive communication deficit (difficulties with communication due to underlying cognitive impairments). Record review of Resident #8's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS 08 score which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. He required supervision or touching assistance for dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene and set up or clean up assistance with walking. Section E of the MDS indicated Resident #8 had not had any behavioral symptoms. Record review of Resident #8's care plan dated 7/25/2025 indicated Resident #8 had impaired cognitive function/dementia or impaired thought processes related to dementia with behaviors with interventions that included: communication: use the residents preferred name. Identify yourself at each interaction. Face the resident when speaking and make eye contact. Reduce any distractions- turn off TV, radio, close door etc. The resident understands consistent, simple, directive sentences. Provide the resident with necessary cues-stop and return if agitated. Record review of a progress note for Resident #8 dated 9/02/2025 at 1:30 AM written by LVN V indicated: A nurse entered the resident's room and witnessed him being sexually assaulted by his roommate. This resident was immediately cleaned and moved to another room. No injuries or bleeding noticed by assessing nurse at the time. On-call Nurse notified as well as Administrator. [town] Police Department also called and resident is being sent out to ER to be assessed 0230 EMS and Police arrived.)253 Resident leaving facility in route in [Hospital] to be assessed. The resident RP also notified. Record review of hospital paperwork for Resident #8 dated 9/02/2025 at 1:29 PM indicated: Date/Time Patient Seen: 9/02/2025 at 3:42 AM. Chief Complaint: Presents for [Facility] with report of sexual assault by another male patient at the facility. Patient denies memory of incident or pain. Paramedic [name] reports that NH staff told him they cleaned him up before transport. History of Present Illness: The patient was brought in from a nursing home over concerns that the patient had been sexually assaulted. According to the nursing staff the nurse walked into the room and found the patient's roommate sexually assaulting him. At that point the patient was brought to the ER to be evaluated. The patient does not recall the events and has significant dementia. Medical Decision Making: The patient was signed out to the oncoming physician pending a SANE exam. Record review of a facility witness statement dated 9/02/2025 at 1:30 AM written by CNA K indicated: Nurse [LVN J] open door to resident room, she saw resident [#8] in the be with resident [#7], she called for me [CNA K] to come here, from shower room, when I walked in the room, both residents bottoms were off, I asked [Resident #8] why he was in the bed with [Resident #7] he stated he didn't know why, both were facing the window, [Resident #7's] arm was across [Resident #8's] waist, when [Resident #7] went to turn over on his back, we could clearly see his penis was in [Resident #8's] buttocks, [Resident #7] had BM on his hands and could see where he had placed his penis in [Resident #8] rectum, [Resident #8] he had BM on his butt cheek and around his rectum, myself and nurse helped [Resident #8] get up out the bed, got him cleaned up and clothes on and covered up in bed. He was weak and very confused to what was going on!! After removing [Resident #8] to another room, I asked [CNA N] to help me to get [Resident #7] cleaned up, had him to get up in his wheelchair, so bed could be cleaned up, he had took his soiled brief off and it was thrown at the end of the bed when we entered the room, (I) saw it, the bed had a small urine stain that was wet under where [Resident #7] was laying & BM on the sheet on the back side where he [Resident #7] was laying., he had BM on his hands, face, legs!! I asked [Resident #7] why he did that to [Resident #8], he stated he didn't know, I asked him had he did that to him before and he said NO!! End of Statement!!! During an interview on 9/02/2025 at 10:20 AM CNA B said Resident #7 would make sexual comments such as you can suck it or can you touch it while she would provide care. She said when she told Resident #7 to stop talking like that he would. She said she knew Resident #7 had made sexual comments to staff but she had never seen Resident #7 make inappropriate sexual comments or gestures to any other residents prior to the incident. During an interview on 9/02/2025 at 10:40 AM Resident #7 said he had been sexually inappropriate with another resident at the facility. He said it was not last night, but it was maybe a month ago and it was not his roommate. He refused to say what resident the incident had occurred with. Resident #7 said he never penetrated anyone with his penis, but he got in the bed with that resident and went through the sexual motions. When asked why Resident #7 did what he did to the other resident he said it was his sexual mind. During an interview on 9/02/2025 at 3:45pm the RCN and COO said they had not been told by the previous facility that Resident #7 had any sexual behaviors prior to being admitted to the facility. The COO then said he thought by placing Resident #7 in the male secure unit they did not think that there would be any inappropriate sexual behaviors since all prior inappropriate sexual behaviors had been towards female staff members. During an interview on 9/02/2025 at 6:18pm LVN J said she was doing a room check at 1:30am and said it was the first time she had seen Resident #7 or Resident #8 since the start of her shift at 6pm. She said when she opened the door to their room, she saw Resident #8 lying in Resident #7s bed with Resident #7
CRITICAL (K) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision was provided to prevent ac...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision was provided to prevent accidents for 8 of 8 residents reviewed for accidents and supervision. (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #5, Resident #6, Resident #7, and Resident #8) The facility failed to adequately provide supervision to prevent Resident #2 from abusing Resident #1 on 6/25/2025 when Resident #2 pushed Resident #1 down on the floor causing a fracture to the left 5th toe. The facility failed to adequately provide supervision to prevent Resident #5 from abusing Resident #3 on 7/13/2025 when Resident #5 hit Resident #3 in the head twice. The facility failed to adequately provide supervision to prevent Resident #4 from abusing Resident #3 on 7/30/2025 when Resident #4 slapped Resident #3 on the right side of the face from behind. The facility failed to adequately provide supervision to prevent Resident #6 from abusing Resident #5 on 8/28/2025 when Resident #6 hit Resident #5 in the face. The facility failed to adequately provide supervision to prevent Resident #7 from sexually abusing Resident #8 on 9/02/2025 causing Resident #8 to be admitted to the hospital. The facility failed to adequately supervise residents on the secured unit to maintain safety and to prevent resident to resident altercations. An IJ was identified on 9/03/2025. The IJ template was provided to the facility on 9/03/2025 at 3:36 PM. While the IJ was removed on 9/04/2025, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of pattern and a severity level of no actual harm with a potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems. This failure placed all residents in the secured unit at risk of injury and death. Findings included: 1.Record review of Resident #1's facility's electronic face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnosis include Alzheimer's Disease with history of psychotic disorder (problem with thinking and delusions), and Hyperlipidemia. Record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 00 (Resident is rarely to never understood), indicating she was severely cognitive impaired. She required supervision to limited assistance with one person assist for dressing, toilet use, personal hygiene and required supervision with ambulation. Record review of Resident #1's care plan dated 03/14/2025 revealed Resident #1 is an elopement risk/wanderer as evidenced by Impaired safety awareness, with interventions that included, distract resident from wandering by offering pleasant diversions, structured, activities, food, conversation, television, book. 2.Record review of Resident #2's facility's electronic face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnosis include dementia with, severe, with other behavioral disturbance, delusional disorders, major depressive, lack of coordination, anxiety disorder and age-related cognitive disorder. Record review of Resident #2's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 00 (Resident is rarely to never understood), indicating she was severely cognitive impaired. She required supervision to limited assistance with one person assist for dressing, toilet use, personal hygiene and required supervision with ambulation. Record review of Resident #2's care plan dated 01/03/2025 revealed Resident #2 is an elopement risk/wanderer as evidenced by Impaired safety awareness, with interventions that included, distract resident from wandering by offering pleasant diversions, structured activities, food, conversation, television, book. Record review of Resident #1 and #2's incident report dated 06/25/2025 revealed incident description that resident #1 was standing over resident #2 who was sitting on the couch. Resident #1 said something to resident #2 and resident # 2 shoved resident #1 causing her to fall. Both Residents was assessed for injuries, skin tear to left elbow and raised area noted to left side of resident #1's head. Xray revealed age indetermination fifth digit proximal phalanx head fracture (fracture to left fifth toe) for resident #1. Record review of witness statement dated 6/25/2025 CNA F stated on the day of 6/25/2025. I saw Resident #2 push Resident #1, causing Resident #1 to fall down. Resident #2 was brought to the nurse's station and sat there during the process of notifying the psych doctor and then was placed on Q15 monitoring. During an interview on 9/4/2025 at 11:49 AM with RN L she said she had worked with Resident #1 and Resident #2, in the past and was not at work during the time of the incident between Resident #1 and Resident #2. She said Resident #1 was on hospice and not aggressive and was mostly bedridden. She said Resident #2 was normally not aggressive and to push someone was out of her normal character. 3. Record review of Resident #3's facility's electronic face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnosis included: Dementia (progressive decline in cognitive abilities, such as memory, thinking, reasoning, and judgment), cognitive communication deficit (difficulty communicating), Alzheimer's disease (memory loss, confusion, and other cognitive decline). Record review of Resident #3's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 09, indicating he was moderately cognitive impaired. He required partial to substantial assist for dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene and required partial/moderate with walking. Record review of Resident #3's care plan dated 7/13/2025 indicated Resident #3 had a psychosocial wellbeing problem potential related to being hit in the face 2 times by Resident #5 on 7/13/2025 with interventions that included: residents separated and both placed on 1:1 monitoring, assessed both residents for injury, emotional distress, and neuros x72 hours, moved other resident to a room on another hall with continued 1:1 monitoring, Psych MD and both RPs notified, gathered witness statements from staff and both residents, BIMS done on both residents, started in-services on Abuse/Neglect and Resident to resident altercations. When conflict arises, remove residents to a calm safe environment and allow to vent/share feelings. Record review of Resident #3's care plan dated 9/03/2024 indicated Resident #3 required medications for behavior management with interventions that included: Monitor/record occurrence for target behavior symptoms: pacing, wandering, disrobing, inappropriate response to verbal communication, violence/aggression towards staff/others and document per facility protocol. Record review of Resident #3's care plan dated 7/30/2025 indicated Resident #3 had a psychosocial wellbeing problem potential related 7/30/2025 being slapped by Resident #4. Resident #3 backed his wheelchair into Resident #4 and when he moved his wheelchair forward Resident #4 slapped him from behind with interventions that included: Resident #4 placed on 1:1 monitoring, Resident #3 referred to Psych services. Both residents assessed for injuries and will be monitored for delayed injuries, none found in initial assessment. Psych MD and both RPs notified. Both residents assessed form emotional distress for 72 hours. In-services provided on Abuse/Neglect and resident to resident altercation. Record review of progress note for Resident #3 dated 7/13/2025 at 4:50 PM written by LVN D indicated Resident #3's nurse was notified by staff that roommate Resident #5 had hit him twice in the head. He reported no injuries noted no acute distress or discomfort noted. Residents were separated, 1:1 monitoring initiated and every 15-minute monitoring, neuros initiated by nurse and all parties were notified by nurse and RN. Record review of progress noted for Resident #3 dated 7/30/2025 at 5:53 PM written by LVN E indicated Resident #3 was sitting in dining room at his table when Resident #4 hit him in the head from behind. Record review of facility incident report dated 7/13/2025 at 4:25 PM indicated Resident #3 was physically hit twice in the head by roommate Resident #5; assessment completed by his nurse no injuries noted resident denies pain or discomfort. Record review of facility incident report dated 7/30/2025 at 5:00 PM indicated Resident #3 was hit in the head from behind by another resident. Redirected other resident away from this resident, placed other resident on 1:1 monitoring. 4. Record review of Resident #4's facility's electronic face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnosis included: Dementia (progressive decline in cognitive abilities, such as memory, thinking, reasoning, and judgment), cognitive communication deficit (difficulty communicating), bipolar disorder (mood swings ranging from depressive lows to manic highs). Record review of Resident #4's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 06, indicating he was severely cognitively impaired. He was dependent or required substantial to maximal assist for dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene. Record review of Resident #4's care plan dated 5/01/2025 and revised on 8/14/2025 indicated Resident #4 had demonstrated physical behaviors and hit another male resident in the face. Interventions included: Residents separated, Resident #4 placed on 1:1 monitoring, and Resident #3 placed on Q15 monitoring. Both residents assessed for injuries and will be monitored for delayed injuries, none found in initial assessment. Psych MD and both RPs notified. Both residents assessed for emotional distress for 72 hours. Witness statements gathered from staff. In-services provided on Abuse/Neglect and resident to resident altercations. Record review of Resident #4's care plan dated 9/30/2024 indicated Resident #4 required medications for behavior management with interventions that included: Monitor/record occurrence for target behavior symptoms: pacing, wandering, disrobing, inappropriate response to verbal communication, violence/aggression towards staff/others and document per facility protocol. Resident #4 was at risk for elopement/wandering as evidenced by a history of attempts to leave facility unattended with interventions that included: Monitor location ever 2 hours and as needed. Document wandering behavior and attempted diversional interventions in behavior log. Record review of progress note for Resident #4 dated 7/30/2025 at 5:21 PM written by LVN E indicated resident was witnessed hitting other resident in right side of head from behind while attempting to come in back door. Psych MD notified and received new order to send to inpatient facility. Record review of progress note for Resident #4 dated 7/30/2025 at 6:00 PM written by LVN E indicated resident placed 1 on 1 with housekeeping sitting with resident at that time. Record review of progress note for Resident #4 dated 7/31/2025 at 11:07 AM written by LVN E indicated behavioral hospital was there to pick resident up. Record review of facility incident report dated 7/30/2025 at 5:00 PM indicated Resident #4 was witnessed hitting Resident #3 in right side of head from behind while attempting to come in back door. Resident #4 redirected away from Resident #3 and out onto open floor with nurse so he could be 1 to 1 at that time. During a confidential interview on 9/02/2025 at 10:54 AM She said on 7/30/2025 Resident #4 was trying to go outside, and Resident #3 was fussing at Resident #4 to not go outside and backed his wheelchair up and into Resident #4 and that was when Resident #4 slapped Resident #3 on the right side of the face from behind. During an interview on 9/04/2025 at 1:10 PM the ADON said Resident #4 had a history of physical aggression. She said prior to the incident with Resident #3, Resident #4 had hit his previous roommate because their wheelchairs had got tangled up. She said Resident #4 had gone out to a behavior hospital for that incident and had not had any aggressive behaviors since that time. She said on 7/30/2025 Resident #3 and Resident #4 were by the back door and Resident #3 backed his wheelchair up and into Resident #4's wheelchair and Resident #4 slapped Resident #3 on the right side of his face from behind. She said Resident #3 had not any incidents of verbal aggression prior to the incident. 5. Record review of Resident #5's facility's electronic face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the most recent admission on [DATE]. Diagnosis included: Dementia (progressive decline in cognitive abilities, such as memory, thinking, reasoning, and judgment), major depressive disorder (feelings of sadness, loss of interest, and other symptoms that interfere with daily life), bipolar disorder (mood swings ranging from depressive lows to manic highs). Record review of Resident #5's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score was not completed due to Resident #5 was rarely/never understood. He required partial to moderate assist for dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene and was independent with walking. Record review of Resident #5's care plan dated 7/13/2025 indicated Resident #5 had potential to demonstrate physical behaviors related to dementia, poor impulse control. Hit another resident 2 times in the face on 7/13/2025 with interventions that included: residents separated and both placed on 1:1 monitoring, assessed both residents for injury, emotional distress, and neuros for 72 hours, Moved this resident to a room on another hall with continued 1:1 monitoring, Psych MD and both RPs notified, gathered witness statements from staff and both residents, BIMS done on both residents, started in-services on Abuse/Neglect and Resident to resident altercations. Record review of Resident #5's care plan dated 8/27/2025 indicated Resident #5 required medications for behavior management with interventions that included: Monitor/record occurrence for target behavior symptoms: pacing, wandering, disrobing, inappropriate response to verbal communication, violence/aggression towards staff/others and document per facility protocol. Record review of progress note for Resident #5 dated 7/13/2025 at 4:35 PM written by LVN D indicated notified by CNA to floor nurse that resident hit roommate twice in the head and then had a shoe and was going to hit another resident but was redirected by nurse, all parties notified, resident placed on 1:1 and every 15-minute monitoring and separated. Record review of facility incident report for Resident #5 dated 7/13/2025 at 4:25 PM indicated: Notified by CNA Resident #5 hit roommate in the head twice and had a shoe in his hand, resident was redirected. Resident assessed by nurse no issues noted, resident redirected by nurse and placed on 1:1 monitoring. During an interview on 9/02/2025 at 10:20 AM CNA B said most days she was on the male secure unit as the only CNA. She said on the day of the incident with were Resident #5 hit Resident #3 she was on the male secure unit as the only CNA. She said Resident #3 had wandered into Resident #5's room and Resident #5 hit Resident #3 in the middle of his forehead with a closed fist 2 times. She said she separated Resident #5 and Resident #3 and went and got the nurse. She said Resident #6 had been aggressive to both Resident #3 and Resident #5. 6. Record review of Resident #6's facility's electronic face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnosis included: schizoaffective disorder (hallucinations and delusions and mood disorder symptoms), major depressive disorder (feelings of sadness, loss of interest, and other symptoms that interfere with daily life), and anxiety (excessive and persistent worry, fear, and nervousness that can interfere with daily life). Record review of Resident #6's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS 06 score which indicated severe cognitive impairment. He was independent for dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene and was independent with walking. Record review of Resident #6's care plan dated 8/27/2025 indicated Resident #6 required psychotropic medications with interventions that included: Monitor/record occurrence of target behavior symptoms (specify: pacing, wandering, disrobing, inappropriate response to verbal communication, violence/aggression towards staff/others.etc) and document per facility protocol. Record review of progress note for Resident #6 dated 8/27/2025 at 12:00 AM written by FNP G indicated: Phone note change of condition. Nursing staff request to address a documented psychiatric issue of concern that requires a timely evaluation and medical intervention. Symptoms included: verbal disruptions, threatening, yelling, hostility towards others, impulsive behavior, initiation of fights, highly irritable, physical aggression towards others, socially inappropriate behavior, verbal aggression, patient is targeting 2 specific male residents, trying to hit them, starting fights, unable to redirect. Record review of progress note for Resident #6 dated 8/28/2025 at 12:00 AM written by FNP G indicated: Phone note change of condition. Nursing staff request to address a documented psychiatric issue of concern that requires a timely evaluation and medical intervention. Symptoms included: Hostility towards others, impulsive behavior, highly irritable, nurse reports that the resident continues to try and hit at a fellow male resident, staff is concerned that the resident may harm others and or himself, staff requesting the resident be sent out to an inpatient psych hospital. Record review of facility behavior nurses note dated 8/27/2025 at 4:45 PM written by the ADON indicated Resident #6 had been verbally aggressive and targeting a specific resident, balling up fist acting like he would hit this resident, resident redirected. Record review of facility behavior nurses note dated 8/28/2025 at 11:55 AM written by the ADON indicated Resident #6 had been verbally aggressive and targeting a specific resident, balling up fist acting like he would hit this resident, resident redirected, resident placed 1:1 supervision. During a confidential interview on 9/02/2025 at 10:54 AM She said Resident #6 was a recent admission from the behavioral hospital and said he came to the facility aggressive. She said Resident #6 had been bullying Resident #5 since he admitted 2 days prior to the incident. She said on 8/28/2025 Resident #5 was sitting at the table in the dining room and Resident #6 walked over to Resident #5 and hit him with a balled-up fist to the right side of the face and chin area. She said Resident #5 did not have any redness or bruising where he was hit. She said when the incident occurred, she was trying to keep a fall risk resident from falling. She said she felt like if there was a second CNA in the male secure unit the incident may have been to be prevented. During an interview on 9/2/2025 at 12:20 PM the DON said CNA A facetime called her and showed her how Resident #6 was acting. She said she then ordered Resident #6 to be placed on 1:1 monitoring. She said it was not a video that was sent to her, but it was an actual in real time facetime call. She said she does not allow videos of residents on her phone and said if there was a recorded video then Resident #6 must have attempted to hit Resident #5 more than once. During a confidential interview on 9/02/2025 at 12:32 PM She said she had taken a video of how Resident #6 had been acting and sent the video via text message to the DON. She said she took the video is desperation to get more help on the male secure unit. Observation of a video taken on 8/28/2025 showed Resident #5 sitting at a table in the dining room of the male secure unit, Resident #6 then walked over to Resident #5 and began attempting to hit Resident #5 multiple times. During an interview on 9/02/2025 at 1:14 PM Housekeeper O said on 8/28/2025 she saw Resident #5 and Resident #6 having a verbal altercation, she said Resident #6 balled up his fists, so she got in between the 2 residents. She said there was only 1 CNA on the male secure unit that day and she was in a room providing care to another resident when the incident she saw occurred. She said she never saw Resident #6 actually make contact with Resident #5 at that time. During an interview on 9/04/2025 at 1:10 PM the ADON said on 8/27/2025 the CNA's had reported to her that Resident #6 was targeting and taunting Resident #5 by acting like he was angry with Resident #5 and attempting to hit him. She said she notified to psych doctor and received an order to increase his medication. She said on 8/28/2025 she was the nurse working on the male secured unit and said CNA A reported to her that Resident #6 was being physically aggressive to Resident #5. She said she brought Resident #6 outside of the male secured unit to the nurse's station and kept him there until he discharged to the behavior hospital. During an interview on 9/04/2025 at 2:07 PM the DON said on 8/28/2025 CNA A was the only CNA on male secure unit that day. She said the ADON was the nurse for the male secure unit that day and reported to her that Resident #6 was becoming more aggressive and told her she had already notified the psych doctor and received the medication increase order and asked if she could put Resident #6 on 1:1 monitoring. She said it was never reported to her that Resident #6 had hit Resident #5. She said she had questioned herself if Resident #6 was appropriate for their male secure unit due to his aggressive behaviors. She said Resident #6 discharged to the behavior hospital on 8/28/2025. During an interview on 9/04/2025 at 3:07 PM the Administrator said it was never reported to her that Resident #6 had been physically aggressive to Resident #5. She said it was reported to her that Resident #6 had been sent out to the hospital, but she did not know it was a behavior hospital. She said it was not until after she read the 24-hour report that she discovered Resident #6 had been sent out to a behavioral hospital. She said they did normally discuss where residents were sent out to in the morning meetings, but she had taken a day off work and was not in the morning meeting the day after Resident #6 had been sent out. She said after she found out Resident #6 had been sent to a behavior hospital; she did not question anyone as to why he was sent to a behavior hospital. She said on 9/03/2025 after surveyors entrance it was discussed with the DON that she must be notified of any resident-to-resident altercations. 7. Record review of Resident #7's facility's electronic face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnosis included: Dementia (progressive decline in cognitive abilities, such as memory, thinking, reasoning, and judgment), major depressive disorder (feelings of sadness, loss of interest, and other symptoms that interfere with daily life), and seizures. Record review of Resident #7's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS 09 score which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. He was dependent for dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene and did not attempt walking. Record review of Resident #7's care plan dated 7/15/2025 indicated Resident #7 had behavior: Sexually inappropriate as evidenced by previous inappropriate behaviors. On 8/11/2025 vulgar, inappropriate comments to nurse during care. On 8/14/2025 sexually inappropriate comments to nurse. Interventions included: Male secure unit, listen/talk to the resident-see if they will tell you why they do the behavior, psychiatric services consult as needed, staff to be in-serviced on behavioral approaches designed to effectively manage unacceptable sexual advances, staff will be trained to respond, but not react to resident's behavior. Record review of Resident #7's care plan dated 9/02/2025 indicated Resident #7 had engaged in physical touch of a sexual nature toward another resident with interventions that included: Avoid leaving resident unsupervised in situations where inappropriate contact may occur, identify and document triggers or patterns leading to inappropriate behaviors, immediately intervene report and document inappropriate sexual contact, resident immediately placed on 1:1 supervision. Record review of Resident #7's care plan dated 7/22/2025 indicated Resident #7 had impaired cognitive function/dementia or impaired thought processes related to dementia with interventions that included: Monitor/document/report to MD any changes in cognition function, specifically changes in: decision making ability, memory, recall and general awareness, difficulty expressing self, difficulty understanding others, level of consciousness, mental status. Record review of progress note for Resident #7 dated 9/02/2025 at 2:45 AM written by the Administrator indicated: this resident involved in resident-to-resident incident approximately 2:30 AM resident placed on 1-on-1 monitoring and will be referred to psych services. Record review of facility incident report for Resident #7 dated 9/02/2025 at 1:30 AM completed by LVN J indicated: this nurse entered residents' room at approximately 1:30 AM and found this resident lying on right side behind other resident facing the window. Observed this resident having sexual intercourse with resident. Upon entering and discovering this resident removed penis and both residents remained laying quietly, this nurse request help from CNA K to remove resident from behind resident and separate them so assessments and investigation of incident could be performed. This resident verbalized that he know what he done and said this incident was the first time, when questioned further this resident began stating he is sad after the recent loss of his son and doesn't want to discuss any further, this resident request he as needed medication for anxiety and nerves, this nurse medicated this resident. 8. Record review of Resident #8's facility's electronic face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnosis included: Dementia (progressive decline in cognitive abilities, such as memory, thinking, reasoning, and judgment), psychotic disorder with delusions due to known physiological condition (false beliefs), cognitive communication deficit (difficulties with communication due to underlying cognitive impairments). Record review of Resident #8's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS 08 score which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. He required supervision or touching assistance for dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene and set up or clean up assistance with walking. Record review of Resident #8's care plan dated 7/25/2025 indicated Resident #8 had impaired cognitive function/dementia or impaired thought processes related to dementia with behaviors with interventions that included: communication: use the residents preferred name. Identify yourself at each interaction. Face the resident when speaking and make eye contact. Reduce any distractions- turn off TV, radio, close door etc. The resident understands consistent, simple, directive sentences. Provide the resident with necessary cues-stop and return if agitated. Record review of Resident #8's care plan dated 7/31/2025 indicated Resident #8 required medications for behavior management with interventions that included: Monitor/record occurrence for target behavior symptoms: pacing, wandering, disrobing, inappropriate response to verbal communication, violence/aggression towards staff/others and document per facility protocol. Record review of hospital paperwork dated 9/02/2025 at 1:29 PM indicated: Date/Time Patient Seen: 9/02/2025 at 3:42 AM. Chief Complaint: Presents for [Facility] with report of sexual assault by another male patient at the facility. Patient denies memory of incident or pain. Paramedic [name] reports that NH staff told him they cleaned him up before transport. History of Present Illness: The patient was brought in from a nursing home over concerns that the patient had been sexually assaulted. According to the nursing staff the nurse walked into the room and found the patient's roommate sexually assaulting him. At that point the patient was brought to the ER to be evaluated. The patient does not recall the events and has significant dementia. Medical Decision Making: The patient was signed out to the oncoming physician pending a SANE exam. Record review of facility witness statement dated 9/02/2025 at 1:30 AM written by CNA K indicated: Nurse [LVN J] open door to resident room, she saw resident [#8] in the be with resident [#7], she called for me [CNA K] to come here, from shower room, when I walked in the room, both residents bottoms were off, I asked [Resident #8] why he was in the bed with [Resident #7] he stated he didn't know why, both were facing the window, [Resident #7] arm was across [Resident #8] waist, when [Resident #7] went to turn over on his back, we could clearly see his penis was in [Resident #8] buttocks, [Resident #7] had BMon his hands and could see where he had placed his penis in [Resident #8] rectum, [Resident #8] he had BM on his butt cheek and around his rectum, myself and nurse helped [Resident #8] get up out the bed, got him cleaned up and clothes on and covered up in bed. He was weak and very confused to what was going on!! After removing [Resident #8] to another room, I asked [CNA N] to help me to get [Resident #7] cleaned up, had him to get up in his wheelchair, so bed could be cleaned up, he had took his soiled brief off and it was thrown at the end of the bed when we entered the room, (I) saw it, the bed had a small urine stain that was wet under where [Resident #7] was laying & BM on the sheet on the back side where he [Resident #7] was laying., he had BM on his hands, face, legs!! I asked [Resident #7] why he did that to [Resident #8], he stated he didn't know, I asked him had he did that to him before and he said NO!! End of Statement!!! During an interview on 9/02/2025 at 10:20 AM CNA B said Resident #7 would make sexual comments such as you can suck it or can you touch it while she would provide care. She said when she told Resident #7 to stop talking like that he would. During an interview on 9/02/2025 at 10:40 AM Resident #7 said he had been sexually inappropriate with another resident here at the facility. He said it was not last night, but it was maybe a month ago and it was not his roommate. He refused to say what resident the incident had occurred with. Resident #7 said he never penetrated anyone with his penis, but he got in the bed with that resident and went through the sexual motions. When asked why Resident #7 did what he did to the other resident he said it was his sexual mind. During an interview on 9/02/2025 at 3:45pm the RCN and COO said they had not been told by the previous facility that Resident #7 had any sexual behaviors prior to being admitted to the facility. The COO then said he thought by placing Resident #7 in the male secure unit they did not think that there would be any inappropriate sexual behaviors since all prior inappropriate sexual behaviors had been towards female staff members. During an interview on 9/02/2025 at 6:18pm LVN J said she was doing a room check at 1:30am and said it was the first time she had seen Resident #7 or Resident #8 since the start of her shift at 6pm. She said when she opened the door to their room, she saw Resident #8 laying in Resident #7s bed with Resident #7 behind Resident #8 and both residents were laying on their right sides facing the window in the room. She said she was shocked with what she saw so she stepped back in the hallway and called for the CNA to come and help her. She said when they walked back in the room they said, what's going on? She said when they said that Resident #7 jumped and turned to see who was coming in the room which caused his penis to withdraw from Resident #8's rectum. She said both residents had a large amount of feces on them, but Resident #7 had feces caked in his front groin area. She said she asked both residents what happened, and Resident #8 said he did not know what happened. She said Resident #7 said he knew what he did and then said, I'm sad my son died. She said Resident #8 seemed to be extremely confused and k
CRITICAL (K) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Deficiency F0725 (Tag F0725)

Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff to provide nursing and ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, when reviewing the facility for sufficient staffing for 2 of 4 hallways (Hallways A and B). The facility failed to adequately staff the A and B hallway (secured units) to prevent resident to resident abuse.The facility failed to ensure A Hall (male secured unit) had sufficient staffing to prevent Resident #2 from abusing Resident #1 on 6/25/2025 when Resident #2 pushed Resident #1 down on the floor causing a fracture to the left 5th toe. The facility failed to ensure A Hall (male secured unit) had sufficient staffing to prevent Resident #5 from abusing Resident #3 on 7/13/2025 when Resident #5 hit Resident #3 in the head twice.The facility failed to ensure A Hall (male secured unit) had sufficient staffing to prevent Resident #4 from abusing Resident #3 on 7/30/2025 when Resident #4 slapped Resident #3 on the right side of the face from behind.The facility failed to ensure A Hall (male secured unit) had sufficient staffing to prevent Resident #6 from abusing Resident #5 on 8/28/2025 when Resident #6 hit Resident #5 in the face.The facility failed to ensure A Hall (male secured unit) had sufficient staffing to prevent Resident #7 from sexually abusing Resident #8 on 9/02/2025 causing Resident #8 to be admitted to the hospital.An IJ was identified on 9/03/2025. The IJ template was provided to the facility on 9/03/2025 at 3:36 PM. While the IJ was removed on 9/04/2025, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of pattern and a severity level of no actual harm with a potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems. This failure could place residents at risk of injuries, abuse, severe negative psychosocial outcomes which could prevent them from achieving their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings included:Record review of Resident #1's facility's electronic face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnosis include Alzheimer's Disease with history of psychotic disorder (problem with thinking and delusions), and Hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol). Record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 00 (Resident is rarely to never understood), indicating she was severely cognitive impaired. She required supervision to limited assistance with one person assist for dressing, toilet use, personal hygiene and required supervision with ambulation. Record review of Resident #1's care plan dated 03/14/2025 revealed Resident #1 is an elopement risk/wanderer as evidenced by Impaired safety awareness, with interventions that included: distract resident from wandering by offering pleasant diversions, structured activities, food, conversation, television, book. Record review of Resident #2's facility's electronic face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnosis include dementia with, severe, with other behavioral disturbance, delusional disorders, major depressive, lack of coordination, anxiety disorder and age-related cognitive disorder. Record review of Resident #2's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 00 (Resident is rarely to never understood), indicating she was severely cognitive impaired. She required supervision to limited assistance with one person assist for dressing, toilet use, personal hygiene and required supervision with ambulation. Record review of Resident #2's care plan dated 01/03/2025 revealed Resident #2 is an elopement risk/wanderer as evidenced by Impaired safety awareness, with interventions that included: distract resident from wandering by offering pleasant diversions, structured activities, food, conversation, television, book. Record review of Resident #1 and #2's incident report dated 06/25/2025 revealed that Resident #1 was standing over Resident #2 who was sitting on the couch. Resident #1 said something to resident #2 and resident # 2 shoved resident #1 causing her to fall. Both Residents were assessed for injuries. A skin tear to left elbow and raised area noted to the left side of Resident #1's head. An x-ray revealed age indeterminate fifth digit proximal phalanx head fracture (fracture to left fifth toe but unable to determine the age of the fracture) for Resident #1. A Record review of a witness statement from CNA F dated 6/25/2025 stated, on the day of 6/25/2025. I saw Resident #2 push Resident #1, causing Resident #1 to fall down. Resident #2 was brought to the nurse's station and sat there during the process of notifying the psych doctor and then was placed on Q15 monitoring. 3. Record review of Resident #3's facility's electronic face sheet revealed an [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included: Dementia (progressive decline in cognitive abilities, such as memory, thinking, reasoning, and judgment), cognitive communication deficit (difficulty communicating), Alzheimer's disease (memory loss, confusion, and other cognitive decline). Record review of Resident #3's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 09, indicating he had moderate cognitive impairment. He required partial to substantial assist for dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene and required partial/moderate assistance with walking. Record review of Resident #3's care plan dated 7/13/2025 indicated Resident #3 had a potential psychosocial wellbeing problem related to being hit in the face 2 times by Resident #5 on 7/13/2025. Interventions that included: residents separated and both placed on 1:1 monitoring (a staff member is assigned to stay with the resident at all times), assessed both residents for injury, emotional distress, and neuros for 72 hours (neurological assessment for 72 hours), moved other resident to a room on another hall with continued 1:1 monitoring, Psych MD and both RPs notified, gathered witness statements from staff and both residents, BIMS done on both residents, started in-services on Abuse/Neglect and Resident to resident altercations. When conflict arises, remove residents to a calm safe environment and allow to vent/share feelings. Record review of Resident #3's care plan dated 7/30/2025 indicated Resident #3 had a potential psychosocial wellbeing problem related to being slapped by Resident #4 on 7/30/2025. Resident #3 backed his wheelchair into Resident #4 and when he moved his wheelchair forward Resident #4 slapped him from behind. Interventions included: Resident #4 placed on 1:1 monitoring, Resident #3 referred to Psych services. Both residents assessed for injuries and will be monitored for delayed injuries, none found in initial assessment. Psych MD and both RPs were notified. Both residents assessed for emotional distress for 72 hours. In-services provided on Abuse/Neglect and resident to resident altercation. Record review of a progress note for Resident #3 dated 7/13/2025 at 4:50 PM written by LVN D indicated Resident #3's nurse was notified by staff that roommate Resident #5 had hit him twice in the head. He reported no injuries noted, no acute distress and no discomfort noted. The residents were separated, 1:1 monitoring initiated and every 15-minute monitoring, neuros initiated by the nurse and all responsible parties were notified by the RN. Record review of a progress noted for Resident #3 dated 7/30/2025 at 5:53 PM written by LVN E indicated Resident #3 was sitting in the dining room at his table when Resident #4 hit him in the head from behind. Record review of a facility incident report dated 7/13/2025 at 4:25 PM indicated Resident #3 was physically hit twice in the head by his roommate Resident #5. An assessment was completed by his nurse. No injuries were noted and the resident denied pain and discomfort. Record review of a facility incident report dated 7/30/2025 at 5:00 PM indicated Resident #3 was hit in the head from behind by Resident #5. Redirected Resident #5 away from Resident #3 and placed Resident #5 on 1:1 monitoring. 4. Record review of Resident #4's facility's electronic face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included: Dementia (progressive decline in cognitive abilities, such as memory, thinking, reasoning, and judgment), cognitive communication deficit (difficulty communicating), bipolar disorder (mood swings ranging from depressive lows to manic highs). Record review of Resident #4's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 06, indicating he was severely cognitively impaired. He was dependent or required substantial to maximal assist for dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene. Record review of Resident #4's care plan dated 5/01/2025 and revised on 8/14/2025 indicated Resident #4 had demonstrated physical behaviors and hit another male resident in the face. Interventions included: Residents separated, Resident #4 placed on 1:1 monitoring and Resident #3 placed on Q15 monitoring. Both residents were assessed for injuries and will be monitored for delayed injuries. None found on initial assessment. Psych MD and both RPs notified. Both residents were assessed for emotional distress for 72 hours. Witness statements gathered from staff. In-services provided on Abuse/Neglect and resident-to-resident altercations. Record review of a progress note for Resident #4 dated 7/30/2025 at 5:21 PM written by LVN E indicated resident was witnessed hitting other resident on the right side of their head from behind while attempting to come in the back door. Psych MD notified and received new order to send to inpatient facility. Record review of progress note for Resident #4 dated 7/30/2025 at 6:00 PM written by LVN E indicated the resident was placed 1 on 1 with housekeeping sitting with the resident at that time. Record review of a progress note for Resident #4 dated 7/31/2025 at 11:07 AM written by LVN E indicated a behavioral hospital was at the facility to pick the resident up. Record review of facility incident report dated 7/30/2025 at 5:00 PM indicated Resident #4 was witnessed hitting Resident #3 on the right side of his head from behind while attempting to come in the back door. Resident #4 was redirected away from Resident #3 with the nurse so he could be 1 to 1 at that time. 5. Record review of Resident #5's facility's electronic face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the most recent admission on [DATE]. Diagnoses included: Dementia (progressive decline in cognitive abilities, such as memory, thinking, reasoning, and judgment), major depressive disorder (feelings of sadness, loss of interest, and other symptoms that interfere with daily life), bipolar disorder (mood swings ranging from depressive lows to manic highs). Record review of Resident #5's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score was not completed due to Resident #5 was rarely/never understood. He required partial to moderate assist for dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene and was independent with walking. Record review of Resident #5's care plan dated 7/13/2025 indicated Resident #5 had potential to demonstrate physical behaviors related to dementia, poor impulse control. Resident #5 hit another resident 2 times in the face on 7/13/2025 with interventions that included: residents separated and both placed on 1:1 monitoring, assessed both residents for injury, emotional distress, and neuros for 72 hours, moved this resident to a room on another hall with continued 1:1 monitoring, Psych MD and both RPs notified, gathered witness statements from staff and both residents, BIMS done on both residents, started in-services on Abuse/Neglect and resident to resident altercations. Record review of a progress note for Resident #5 dated 7/13/2025 at 4:35 PM written by LVN D indicated the nurse was notified by the CNA that the resident hit his roommate twice in the head and then had a shoe and was going to hit another resident, but the resident was redirected by nurse. All parties were notified. The resident was placed on 1:1 and separated from other residents. Record review of facility incident report for Resident #5 dated 7/13/2025 at 4:25 PM indicated: Notified by the CNA Resident #5 hit roommate in the head twice and had a shoe in his hand. The resident was redirected. The resident was assessed by the nurse and no issues were noted. The resident was redirected by the nurse and placed on 1:1 monitoring. 6. Record review of Resident #6's facility's electronic face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included: schizoaffective disorder (hallucinations and delusions and mood disorder symptoms), major depressive disorder (feelings of sadness, loss of interest, and other symptoms that interfere with daily life), and anxiety (excessive and persistent worry, fear, and nervousness that can interfere with daily life). Record review of Resident #6's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS 06 score which indicated severe cognitive impairment. He was independent for dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene and was independent with walking. Record review of Resident #6's care plan dated 8/27/2025 indicated Resident #6 required psychotropic medications with interventions that included: Monitor/record occurrence of target behavior symptoms (specify: pacing, wandering, disrobing, inappropriate response to verbal communication, violence/aggression towards staff/others etc.) and document per facility protocol. Record review of a progress note for Resident #6 dated 8/27/2025 at 12:00 AM written by FNP G indicated: Change of condition. Nursing staff requested to address a documented psychiatric issue of concern that requires a timely evaluation and medical intervention. Symptoms included: verbal disruptions, threatening, yelling, hostility towards others, impulsive behavior, initiation of fights, highly irritable, physical aggression towards others, socially inappropriate behavior, verbal aggression, patient is targeting 2 specific male residents, trying to hit them, starting fights, unable to redirect. Record review of a progress note for Resident #6 dated 8/28/2025 at 12:00 AM written by FNP G indicated: Change of condition. Nursing staff requested to address a documented psychiatric issue of concern that requires a timely evaluation and medical intervention. Symptoms included: Hostility towards others, impulsive behavior, highly irritable. Nurse reports that the resident continues to try and hit at a fellow male resident. Staff is concerned that the resident may harm others and or himself, staff requesting the resident be sent out to an inpatient psych hospital. Record review of a facility behavior nurses note dated 8/27/2025 at 4:45 PM written by the ADON indicated Resident #6 had been verbally aggressive and targeting a specific resident, balling up fists acting like he would hit the resident. The resident was redirected. Record review of a facility behavior nurses note dated 8/28/2025 at 11:55 AM written by the ADON indicated: Resident #6 had been verbally aggressive and targeting a specific resident, balling up fists acting like he would hit the resident. The resident was redirected and resident placed 1:1 supervision. 7. Record review of Resident #7's facility's electronic face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included: Dementia (progressive decline in cognitive abilities, such as memory, thinking, reasoning, and judgment), major depressive disorder (feelings of sadness, loss of interest, and other symptoms that interfere with daily life), and seizures. Record review of Resident #7's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS 09 score which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. He was dependent for dressing; toilet use and personal hygiene and did not attempt walking. Record review of Resident #7's care plan dated 7/15/2025 indicated Resident #7 had behavior: Sexually inappropriate as evidenced by previous inappropriate behaviors. On 8/11/2025 vulgar, inappropriate comments to nurse during care. On 8/14/2025 sexually inappropriate comments to nurse. Interventions included: Male secure unit, listen/talk to the resident-see if they will tell you why they do the behavior, psychiatric services consult as needed, staff to be in serviced on behavioral approaches designed to effectively manage unacceptable sexual advances, staff will be trained to respond, but not react to resident's behavior. Record review of Resident #7's care plan dated 9/02/2025 indicated Resident #7 had engaged in physical touch of a sexual nature toward another resident with interventions that included: Avoid leaving resident unsupervised in situations where inappropriate contact may occur, identify and document triggers or patterns leading to inappropriate behaviors, immediately intervene report and document inappropriate sexual contact, resident immediately placed on 1:1 supervision. Record review of a progress note for Resident #7 dated 9/02/2025 at 2:45 AM written by the Administrator indicated: the resident was involved in resident-to-resident incident at approximately 2:30 AM. The resident was placed on 1-on-1 monitoring and will be referred to psych services. Record review of a facility incident report for Resident #7 dated 9/02/2025 at 1:30 AM completed by LVN J indicated: this nurse entered residents' room at approximately 1:30 AM and found the resident lying on his right side behind another resident facing the window. The nurse observed the resident having sexual intercourse with the other resident. Upon entering the room, the resident removed his penis from the other resident and both residents remained lying quietly. This nurse requested help from CNA K to separate the residents so assessments and investigation of incident could be performed. This resident verbalized that he knew what he had done and said this incident was the first time. When questioned further this resident stated he was sad after the recent loss of his son and doesn't want to discuss any further. This resident requested medication for anxiety and nerves. This nurse medicated this resident. 8. Record review of Resident #8's facility's electronic face sheet revealed an [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included: Dementia (progressive decline in cognitive abilities, such as memory, thinking, reasoning, and judgment), psychotic disorder with delusions due to known physiological condition (false beliefs), cognitive communication deficit (difficulties with communication due to underlying cognitive impairments). Record review of Resident #8's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS 08 score which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. He required supervision or touching assistance for dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene and set up or clean up assistance with walking. Record review of Resident #8's care plan dated 7/25/2025 indicated Resident #8 had impaired cognitive function/dementia or impaired thought processes related to dementia with behaviors with interventions that included: communication: use the residents preferred name. Identify yourself at each interaction. Face the resident when speaking and make eye contact. Reduce any distractions- turn off TV, radio, close door etc. The resident understands consistent, simple, directive sentences. Provide the resident with necessary cues-stop and return if agitated. During an observation on 9/2/2025 at 10:42am of the female unit, there was one CNA providing care for 7 residents. 4 female residents were sitting in the common area watching TV, 2 female residents were sitting at the table doing activities (coloring) and one female resident was sitting outside alone smoking (in an enclosed sitting/smoking area and could be seen by staff through a large window). During an interview on 09/02/2025 at 11:40am the MA said staffing had been an issue due to people calling in or not showing up for work. She said there were times other staff had come in for extra shifts and times they could not get coverage for the workers who did not show up. She said the facility was staffed with only four CNAs and two nurses. One nurse worked the A & B halls (secured units), one nurse works C&D halls and one CNA staffed on each hall. She said she felt the facility would benefit from having more available CNAs and nurses. She said she felt the residents would receive a better quality of care with an increase of staff. During an interview on 9/4/2023 at 9:15am CNA-F said on most days more help was needed. She said she had worked up to 16 hours straight but had heard of other workers working 18 to 24 hours straight and going home for a 6-hour break and coming back for their regular 12-hour shift. She said staff volunteered to work the hours if the facility was short staffed. She said they had been provided walkie talkies on 9/04/2025 to call for help when needed, such as when giving a resident a shower, other resident needs or if they needed a break. She said she felt that more staff would be a plus to resident care. She said instead of doing the basic care staff would be able to provide a better quality of care and prevent things such as resident to resident altercation, falls, toileting and any negative incidents. During an interview on 9/4/2023 at 9:40am the Housekeeping Supervisor said she helped in the kitchen, housekeeping and monitored on the halls. She said she did not provide direct care for residents but did monitor the residents (kept residents separated) on the unit (A & B halls) when the CNA needed to take a break or leave the unit for short periods. She said staffing was an issue some days and more staff would be a plus when caring for residents. She said on the unit most days there were behaviors to address, and one person could not see that all needs were being addressed at all times. She said the female unit had 7 residents that wanted constant interactions of some kind. She said most of them just wanted continual attention from staff as if they felt lonely and it was hard for one staff to assure all needs were met. She said on the male unit there were 15 residents, most with aggressive behaviors or wanted constant attention and it was impossible for one staff to ensure all needs were addressed for all residents on any shift. She said she had not witnessed anyone working more than 12 hours per shift. She said she mainly did housekeeping and did not have to stay over. During an interview on 9/4/2025 at 11:49AM RN-L said she had worked with Resident #1 and Resident #2, in the past and was not at work during the time of the incident between Resident #1 and Resident #2. She said Resident #1 was on hospice and was not aggressive and mostly bedridden. She said Resident #2 was normally not aggressive and to push someone was out of her normal character. She said the incident may have been prevented if there were at least two staff working together on all halls especially the halls A&B (secured units) due to the residents with behavior issues were housed on those halls. She said daily staffing included 2 nurses, one for A&B hall and 1 for C&D hall, 1 med aid, 1 CNA on A hall, 2 CNAs on B hall, one CNA on C hall and one CNA on D hall. She said she felt like there should be sufficient staffing at all times, but not all employees showed up for work as scheduled. She said when staff did not show up to work the on-call person was notified, and they were responsible for getting someone to come in and cover that shift. She said she had not worked more than 12 hours at a time. She said the least amount of CNAs she worked with in the facility was 2 nurses and 2 CNAs. She said when there were only 4 workers in the building at night it left them one worker short. She said one CNA floated from hall to hall helping the other CNAs. She said she had witnessed staff working 6A to 10P due to short staffing. She said she had not seen anyone working close to 24 hours at a time and but did hear that it had happened. She said if there were more staff to cover shifts it would make a difference in the quality of care provided to residents. During an interview on 9/4/2025 at 4:00pm CNA-B said she had not worked 24 hours straight but knew that some of the other staff worked 20-24 hours at a time. She said she volunteered to work extra hours but no more than 12-16 hours straight. She said she was not asked to or felt forced to work the extra hours by the administrative staff. She said she they had been short staffed due to a Covid outbreak and some people quitting, calling in or just not showing up. During an interview on 9/4/2025 at 1:24PM the ADON said the staffing pattern was usually two CNAs on halls C and D, one CNA on hall A, 1 CNA on hall B, one MA and two nurses (1 on hall A&B and 1 on hall C&D) during the day. She said the only staffing changes for the night shifts was one aide on the B hall and no MA was scheduled for the night shift. She said when someone called in, she would come in and cover the shift or another staff was called in to work. If they could not find someone to work, the person on call would cover the shift. She said they had worked with only 4 workers for the entire building in the past. She said it was not ideal but when staff did not come to work, they did the best they could to ensure all of the residents' needs were met. She said they would pull a CNA from A hall, leaving one CNA on the male unit (hall A) occasionally to make sure every hall had at least one CNA. She said sometimes they were fully staffed and other times they were short staffed. She said due to Covid and staff quitting they were short staffed and needed to hire 3 CNAs before the facility would be fully staffed. She said they were trying to hire workers at that time. She said they did allow their staff to work 20 plus hours. She said they never asked staff to work 20 plus hours and knew it was not safe for staff or residents if staff worked exhausted. She said the facility was short staffed and some staff volunteered to work extra hours, and they were allowed to work such long hours due to being short staffed and the facility needing coverage. During an interview on 9/4/2025 at 1:24PM the Administrator said she had been notified of low staffing issues. She said the facility was in the process of hiring at least 3 more CNAs. She said the staff especially the CNAs had issues with calling in and not coming for their scheduled shift. She said they tried to staff 1 CNA on hall C and one CNA on hall D for daytime, 2 CNAs on Hall A (Male Unit) and 1 CNA on hall B (Female Unit). She said for the male secure unit there should always be at least 2 CNAs. She said she did not know that staff was working 20-24 hours straight and did not feel it was safe for the staff or the residents to work that many hours. She said she did not feel it was safe for the residents to have resident to resident altercations as someone could get hurt. She said there could be a decline in care if there was not enough staff to sufficiently always address the needs of all residents. Record review of the Facility assessment dated [DATE] indicated Staffing will be based upon the needs and acuity of the residents in-house. If acuity increases so will the staffing departments. This also goes for an overall increase in total census. The administrator will identify needs based on each admission and discharge and will make corrective action in staffing needs. Record review of the payroll detail indicated CNA-H worked 22.72 hours in a 24-hour time frame beginning on 8/25/25 at 5:46am through 8/26/2025 at 5:46am. Record review of the payroll detail report indicated CNA-B worked 23.67 hours in a 24-hour time frame beginning on 8/30/2025 at 1:25pm thru 8/31/2025 at 1:25pm. Record review of facility policy, dated September 2022, titled Resident to Resident Altercations indicated, .1. Facility staff monitor residents for aggressive/inappropriate behaviors toward other resident, family members, visitors, or to the staff.Record review of facility policy, Inservice: Redirecting Dementia Patients dated 06/25/2025 indicated, Objective: To equip staff with effective techniques for safely and respectfully redirecting residents with dementia during episodes of confusion, agitation, or repetitive behavior. Record Review of facility policy titled Hours of Work, Indicated, Our facility has established hours of work in accordance with resident needs and current regulations governing our facility's staffing requirements. *Employees take 8 hours break after working 16 hours. This was determined to be an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 9/03/2025 at 3:36 p.m. The facility Administrator, and DON were notified. The Administrator was provided with the IJ template on 9/03/2025 at 3:36 p.m. and a plan of removal was requested. The facility's plan of removal was accepted on 9/04/2025 at 12:18 PM and included: The following is a plan of removal, which has been immediately implemented at [Facility], to remedy the immediate jeopardy which was imposed 9/3/25 at 3:32pm.All items listed will be completed by 9/4/25 at 2:00 pm with continued follow up for scheduled staff. 1. Resident #2 was placed on 1:1 while contact was made for psych services on 6/25/25. Psych services reviewed the information and initiated a medication review with change of medication order regarding the resident-to-resident altercation. Resident #1 was moved to Q15 minute checks on 6/25/25 and a telehealth visit was completed on 6/26/25. Resident #1 was monitored for emotional distress for 72 hours post the incident. 2. Resident #1 was assessed for pain and injuries on 6/25/25. Resident #1 was administered a medication for pain (OTC medication) following the event. Facility obtained orders for X ray per hospice regarding a fracture that resulted in age indeterminate fracture of the 5th digital proximal phalanx. Neuros were initiated per protocol for Resident #1 as well as injury monitoring for 72 hours. Resident #1 was monitored for emotional distress for 72 hours post the incident and none exhibited. Resident #2 was on hospice services and is now deceased . 3. 7/30/25 Resident #3 had emotional distress assessment completed for 72 hours post the incident of #3 being hit. 7/30/25 Resident #3 was assessed for injuries and no injuries were present from the altercation with Resident #4. Psych referral was completed on 7/31/25 for Resident #3 and NP visit took place on 8/11/25 with order changes. 4. 7/30/25 Resident #4 was placed on 1:1 following the incident. Resident #4's psych physician was updated regarding the incident 7/30/25 and gave an order for psych behavioral placement. Resident #4 left the faciity on 7/31/25.5. 7/13/25 Resident #5 was placed on 1:1 supervision in response to the incident that occurred. Resident #5 was moved to a different hallway on 7/13/25. A psych physician visit took place on 7/14/25 with orders for behavioral health placement. Resident #5 was admitted to behavioral psych services on 7/14/25.6. Resident #3 was assessed for injuries on 7/13/25 and none were present. Resident #3 had emotional distress monitoring completed for 72 hours post the incident with Resident #5. Neuros were initiated per protocol. Resident #3 had no emotional distress related to the incident with resident #5.7. Resident #6 was placed on 1:1 supervision in response to the resident-to-resident altercation with resident #5 on 8/28/25. Psych services was contacted on 8/28/25 regarding the incident and orders were obtained to send to behavioral health for review. Resident #6 left the facility per the order on 8/28/25. Resident #5 had no injuries in response to the incident.8. Resident #8 was assessed by the nurse and sent to the ER for evaluation and admitted for alternate placement as the admitting diagnosis. Resident #8 is set to return to the facility on 9/3/25 with no updated orders at this time and the facility will change interventions according to any new orders.9. Res
Apr 2025 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the right to be free from abuse was provided fo...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the right to be free from abuse was provided for 2 of 12 residents reviewed for abuse. (Resident #1 and Resident #3) in that: The facility failed to protect Resident #1 from Abuse on [DATE] when Resident #2 stuck his hand into Resident #1's shirt and groped her breast. The facility failed to protect Resident #3 from Abuse on [DATE] when Resident #4 pushed Resident #3's wheelchair over and hit him in the face. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The past noncompliance began on [DATE] and ended on [DATE]. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. This failure could place residents at risk of injury, pain, hospitalization, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included: 1. An admission record dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 was an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of metabolic encephalopathy and secondary diagnoses of stage 3 pressure ulcer of sacrum, chronic kidney disease, and rhabdomyolysis (disorder of muscle breakdown). An MDS dated [DATE] revealed she had a BIMS of 7 which indicated severe cognitive impairment. She was dependent on staff for most ADLS, and she was always incontinent of both bowel and bladder. Resident #1 expired in the facility on [DATE]. A closed record comprehensive care plan for Resident #1 indicated she had impaired cognitive function or impaired thought processes related to diagnosis of metabolic encephalopathy. Interventions were in place to engaging resident in simple, structured activities, and keeping resident's routine consistent to decrease confusion. An admission record dated [DATE] indicated Resident #2 was a [AGE] year-old male with a primary diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease and secondary diagnoses of vascular dementia (altered cognition), hemiplegia (weakness on one side of the body), and major depressive disorder. An MDS dated [DATE] indicated a BIMS was not conducted due to resident being rarely or never understood. He was dependent on staff for assistance putting on/taking off footwear, upper and lower body dressing, shower/bathing; he required maximum assistance with personal hygiene and toileting hygiene; he required setup assistance with eating and oral hygiene. He was continent of bowel and bladder. A comprehensive care plan dated [DATE] for Resident #2 revealed he had potential to demonstrate physical behaviors related to poor impulse control and was transferred to the men's secured unit following groping Resident #1's breast. During an observation and interview on [DATE] at 10:52 a.m. Resident #2 was observed sitting in his wheelchair in his room. He appeared clean and well-groomed with no offensive odors and had no visible marks, bruising, or skin tears. Resident #2 said he put his hand inside Resident #1's shirt and touched her breast. He said he had no prior relationship with Resident #1, and she had not given him consent to touch her. He said he does not know why he touched her breast. During an interview on [DATE] at 9:45 a.m. the ADM said Resident #1 was sitting in her geri chair (specialized recliner) by the nurse's station when Resident #3 rolled his wheelchair up beside her and stuck his hand inside her shirt. ADM said the incident was witnessed by several staff members and they intervened immediately, separating residents. ADM said she watched the security camera footage and confirmed the incident did happen. The ADM said Resident #2 was transferred to the secured men's unit following the incident. Review of a witness statement from ADM dated [DATE] given after reviewing facility camera revealed Resident #2 rolled his wheelchair beside Resident #1, reached over with his left hand, and touched her. Resident #1 grabbed his arm and started to push it away when staff intervened. Review of a witness statement from the Social Worker following an interview of Resident #1 after the incident. The witness statement revealed Resident #1 responded yeah when asked if a man had recently reached under her shirt and touched her breast. Resident #1 responded I think he should have been decked when asked if the incident left her emotionally upset. 2. An admission record dated [DATE] indicated Resident #3 was a [AGE] year-old male readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of major depressive disorder with psychotic symptoms and secondary diagnoses of dementia and psychotic disorder (disconnection from reality) with delusions. An MDS dated [DATE] revealed he had a BIMS of 11 which indicated moderately impaired cognition. He required moderate to substantial assistance for all ADLs except eating, which required setup/cleanup assistance. A comprehensive care plan dated [DATE] for Resident #3 indicated he had exhibited aggressive behaviors including hitting the secure unit door, yelling, and cursing at staff, going through other residents' belongings, and attempting to wake residents up. Interventions were in place including encouraging facility involvement, recognizing resident stressors, and provide resident with as many options for control over his care as possible. He was transferred to a behavioral health facility on [DATE]. An admission record dated [DATE] indicated Resident #4 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease and secondary diagnoses of bipolar disorder and unspecified psychosis. An MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS had not been conducted due to resident being rarely/never understood. He was dependent on staff for personal hygiene and toileting hygiene; he required moderate assistance for upper body/lower body dressing and putting on/taking off footwear; he required supervision for oral hygiene; he required setup assistance for eating. He was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. A comprehensive care plan for Resident #4 indicated he had a history of exhibiting aggressive behaviors toward others and had been previously referred to a behavioral health facility. The same care plan indicated he required psychotropic medications for diagnosis of Mood Changes/Behavior management and took Risperidone. During an observation and attempted interview on [DATE] at 10:30 a.m. Resident #4 was sitting in the day room on the men's secured unit, he appeared clean and well-groomed with no offensive odors and had no visible marks, bruising, or skin tears. Resident #4 did not respond to questions and could not be interviewed due to cognitive impairment. During an interview on [DATE] at 1:30 p.m., the ADM said she reviewed the facility camera and observed Resident #4 walking down the hallway, Resident #3 was going in the opposite direction of same hallway in his wheelchair. She said the video showed Resident #3 moved his wheelchair in front of Resident #4 which blocked his path. ADM said Resident #4 lifted Resident #3's wheelchair and tilted it backwards until it fell. She said Resident #3 was lying on his back, still in the wheelchair, and tried to kick Resident #4. She said Resident #4 bent down and punched Resident #3 in the nose. The ADM said following the incident both residents were separated, assessed, notifications were made, and both residents were placed on one-to-one observation until they were transferred to a behavioral health facility for evaluation. ADM said QAPI (Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement) had met concerning resident to resident altercations and the facility provided additional training to staff as well as re-evaluated roommate pairings on the men's secure unit. Requested to view facility camera recordings of incidents; the facility did not provide recordings. Review of an incident report dated [DATE] for Physical Aggression completed by LVN A indicated Resident #3 had an injury, redness to his nose, because of the altercation with Resident #4. Facility took appropriate actions to correct the non-compliance prior to surveyor entry and there was no current non-compliance due to: Facility took immediate action following the incidents including separating, assessing, and notifying. Resident #1 expired. Resident #2 was moved to the mens unit. In-services were conducted. QAPI meetings conducted following each incident. Review of QAPI Committee Report dated [DATE] which discussed topics Abuse, Neglect, and Misappropriation. Review of QAPI Committee Report dated [DATE] which discussed topics Reporting Abuse, Neglect and Misappropriation and Resident to Resident Abuse. Review of in-service dated [DATE] titled Identifying Sexual Abuse and Capacity to Consent. Review of in-service dated [DATE] titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program. Review of in-service undated titled Resident Rights Review of facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program revised on [DATE] indicated the following: . The resident abuse, neglect, and exploitation prevention program consists of a facility-wide commitment and resource allocation to support the following objectives: 1. Protect residents from abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of property by anyone including, but not necessarily limited to: a. Facility staff; b. Other residents; c. Consultants; d. Volunteers; e. Staff from other agencies; f. Legal representatives; g. Friends; h. Visitors; and/or i. Any other individual
Sept 2024 5 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pharmacy Services (Tag F0755)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to establish a system of records of receipt and disposition of all controlled drugs in sufficient detail to enable an accurate reconciliation ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to establish a system of records of receipt and disposition of all controlled drugs in sufficient detail to enable an accurate reconciliation and follow a policy to provide pharmacy services in accordance with State and Federal laws or rules of the Drug Enforcement Administration for 1 of 12 months (January 2024) reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to document the required number of 2 witness signatures for drug destruction on 1/5/2024. This failure could put residents at risk for misappropriation and drug diversion. Findings included: Record review of facility drug destruction records for the last 12 months (12/2023 to 8/2024 ) reflected that on 1/5/2024 the cover page and the attached page were only signed by the DON and the Pharmacist and did not include any additional witness signatures. During an interview on 9/4/2024 at 11:49 AM, the DON who said the drug destruction sheets were normally signed by the Pharmacist, ADON and herself. She said in January 2024 she did not have an ADON at that time. She said the drug destruction sheets needed the Pharmacist signature and 2 witness signatures and having 2 witnesses instead of 3 helped prevent the risk of a drug diversion. During an interview on 9/5/2024 at 9:20 AM, the Administrator who said she was not part of the drug destruction process in the facility. She said she only signed a form after it was completed and did not witness any of the destruction. She said she knew the sheets had to be signed by at least 2 nurse and was not aware that she could be a witness as well. She said there was a risk for drug diversion if they did not have the appropriate signatures on the drug destruction pages. Record review of a facility policy titled Discarding and Destroying Medications revised November 2022 reflected, .Medications that cannot be returned to the dispensing pharmacy are disposed of in accordance with federal, state and local regulations governing management of non-hazardous pharmaceuticals, hazardous waste and controlled substances. 10. The medication disposition for controlled drugs record contains, as a minimum, the following information: i. Signature of witnesses . Record review of the Texas Administrative Code retrieved from https://texreg.sos.state.tx.us/ on 8/7/2024 reflected: .Dangerous drugs may be destroyed provided the following conditions are met . (C) The signature of the consultant pharmacist and witness(es) to the destruction and the method of destruction specified in subparagraph (B) of this paragraph may be on a cover sheet attached to the inventory and not on each individual inventory sheet, provided the cover sheet contains a statement indicating the number of inventory pages that are attached and each of the attached pages are initialed by the consultant pharmacist and witness(es) .
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and c...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 12 residents (Resident #15) and 1 of 5 staff (NA C) reviewed for infection control. NA C did not sanitize or wash her hands between glove changes when providing incontinent care to Resident #15 on 9/3/2024. These failures could place residents at risk of exposure to infectious diseases due to improper infection control practices. Findings included: Record review of an admission Record dated 9/4/2024 for Resident #15 reflected she admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was [AGE] years old with diagnoses of diverticulitis of intestine (an infection in the inside walls of the intestine), chronic kidney disease (gradual loss of kidney function), age related osteoporosis (a condition that results from aging when bone formation does not keep up with bone removal) and bipolar disorder (a mental health condition that causes extreme mood swings). Record review of a care plan revised on 8/16/2024 for Resident #15 reflected she had bowel and bladder incontinence and was at risk for skin breakdown. Interventions included incontinent and to check the resident every 2 hours and as required for incontinence. Record review of a Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #15 reflected she did not have any impairment in thinking with a BIMS score of 15. She required substantial/maximal assistance with toileting hygiene. She was always incontinent of bladder and bowel. During an observation on 9/3/2024 at 9:09 AM in the room of Resident #15 revealed CNA B and NA C were in the room to provide incontinent care. Both washed their hands in the bathroom and applied gloves. CNA B pulled down Resident #15's brief between her legs and NA C removed wipes from the container. NA C removed a wipe and wiped down the left inner thigh and placed the wipe in the trash. NA C took another wipe and wiped down the right inner thigh and placed it in the trash. NA C took a wipe, and wiped down the middle of the vagina from front to back and placed the wipe in the trash. CNA B rolled Resident #15 onto her right side, and NA C removed a wipe and wiped her rectum from front to back and placed the wipe and brief in the trash. NA C applied barrier ointment to Resident #15's buttocks and removed her gloves and placed them in the trash. NA C placed clean gloves on her hands without washing or sanitizing them. NA C placed a clean brief underneath the resident's buttocks and secured it and Resident #15 was repositioned in her bed. NA C removed her gloves and placed them in the trash. NA C placed clean gloves on her hands without washing or sanitizing them and picked up a soda for the resident and poured it into a cup that was on the over bed table. CNA B removed her gloves and placed them in the trash and went into the bathroom and washed her hands. NA C removed her gloves and placed them in the trash and washed her hands in the bathroom. NA C gathered the trash and exited the room to dispose of the trash. During an interview on 9/3/2024 at 9:23 AM, NA C said she had been employed at the facility since November 2023 and worked 6am-6pm. She stated during the care provided to Resident #15, she would not have done anything differently. She said she had a skills check-off with the DON yesterday 9/2/2024. She said she was trained on glove changes and if cream was applied to change gloves after that. She said she was taught to change periodically and to wash hands between gloves changes. She said if she was messing with the same person, then she would wash her hands before care was started and the only time, she would wash her hands between times was if she was dealing with fecal material. She said she probably should have washed or sanitized her hands during gloves changes. She said residents could be at risk for infections if staff do not wash or sanitize their hands. Record review of a competency skills check off dated 8/1/2024 for NA C reflected she was successful with incontinent care of a female resident. During an interview on 9/4/2024 at 11:49 AM, the DON who said hand hygiene should be performed before care was started and at any point gloves were changed and they were not to touch anything with dirty gloves. She said she was not aware of the incident with NA C with incontinent care on 9/3/2024. She said NA C had completed the CNA training program at their facility but had not scheduled to take her test. She said there was a risk for cross contamination, passing germs or infections if staff did not perform hand hygiene. During an interview on 9/5/2024 at 9:20 AM, the Administrator who said hand hygiene should be performed multiple times during care provided, when hands were visibly dirty, if going from one person to another, prior to any kind of care and after, between glove changes and if gloves were ripped or torn. She said residents could be at risk for infections if staff did not perform hand hygiene. Record review of a facility policy titled Handwashing/Hand Hygiene revised October 2023 reflected, .This facility considers hand hygiene the primary means to prevent the spread of healthcare-associated infections. 1. All personnel are trained and regularly in-serviced on the importance of hand hygiene in preventing the transmission of healthcare-associated infections. Indications for Hand Hygiene: 1. Hand hygiene is indicated: g. Immediately after glove removal .
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0558 (Tag F0558)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure the right to reside and receive services in ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences except when to do so would endanger the health or safety of the resident or other residents for 3 of 20 residents (Residents #16, 20, and 39) reviewed for call lights. 1. The facility failed to ensure the call light in Resident #16's bathroom located on the men's secured unit were not wrapped around the support bar and were reachable from the floor on 9/03/2024. 2.The facility failed to ensure the call light in Resident #20's bathroom and rooms [ROOM NUMBER] located on the women's secured unit were not wrapped around the support bar and were reachable from the floor on 9/03/2024. 3. The facility failed to ensure the call lights in the bathrooms of rooms [ROOM NUMBER] located on the womens secured unit were reachable for Resident #39 on 9/03/2024. These failures could affect residents who used their call light or desire to use the call light and place them at risk of not being able to notify staff of their needs. Findings: 1.Record review of a facility face sheet dated 9/4/24 for Resident #16 reflected that he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including: dementia and Parkinsonism (clinical syndrome characterized by tremor, bradykinesia (slowed movements), rigidity, and postural instability). Record review of a Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] for Resident #16 reflected that he had a BIMS score of 10, which indicated that he had a moderate cognitive impairment. He required partial/moderate assistance with transfers. He was frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. Record review of a comprehensive care plan dated 8/22/23 for Resident #16 reflected that he was at moderate risk for falls related to confusion with an intervention that read .the resident needs a safe environment with: .a working and reachable call light . During an observation on 9/3/24 at 9:31 am revealed room [ROOM NUMBER] on the men's secured unit had a call light in the restroom which appeared to be approximately 6-7 inches and would be too short to have been reachable from the floor. During an observation and interview on 9/3/24 at 9:39 am revealed room [ROOM NUMBER] on the men's secured unit had a call light in the restroom that was wrapped around the grab bar. Resident #16 was in the room sitting up on the side of the bed. Resident #16 said that he does use the restroom by himself. He denied any falls. He said if he did fall, he would need to be able to reach the call light. Resident #16 was observed propelling self into the restroom to use the toilet. During an observation on 9/3/24 at 9:48 am revealed room [ROOM NUMBER] on the men's secured unit was observed to have a call light wrapped around the grab bar in the restroom. During an interview on 9/3/24 at 9:53 am CNA D said the call light in the restrooms should not be wrapped around the grab bars. She said she did not know why, but she knew they shouldn't be. She was unaware of who was responsible for the call lights in the resident's restrooms. She said Resident #16 did use his restroom independently. During an interview on 9/3/24 at 9:58 am Housekeeper said maintenance was responsible for the call lights in the resident's restrooms. 2.Record review of a facility face sheet dated 9/04/24 reflected Resident #20 was a [AGE] year-old female that admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of phantom limb syndrome with pain and unsteadiness on feet and resided on the women's secured unit. Record review of a comprehensive care plan dated 4/11/22 reflected Resident #20 had bladder incontinence at times and encourage fluids during the day to promote prompted voiding responses, has an ADL self-care performance deficit r/t loss of limbs, digits, cognitive deficits, and had an actual fall and to use her call light for help. Record review of a quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #20 had a BIMS of 15 indicating intact cognition and required moderate assistance with toileting. During an interview on 9/03/24 at 9:15 am Resident #20 said she resided in room [ROOM NUMBER] , used her bathroom and would pull her call light if she needed help. 3. Record review of a facility face sheet dated 9/04/24 indicated Resident #39 was a [AGE] year-old female that admitted to the facility 3/30/23 with diagnosis of dementia and resided on the women's secured unit. Record review of a comprehensive care plan dated 4/04/23 indicated Resident #39 was a high fall risk related confusion and to be sure the resident's call light was within reach and encourage the resident to use it. Record review of a quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #39 could not complete BIMS testing and had memory problems, had severely impaired cognition and required supervision for toileting. During an observation on 9/03/2024 at 9:10 am on the women's secured unit, rooms 19- and 20's-bathroom call light was wrapped and tied in a knot to the support bar and room [ROOM NUMBER]'s-bathroom call light was tied in a knot and was approximately 3 feet from the floor. During an interview on 09/03/24 at 9:20 AM CNA E said she had worked at the facility for 19 years. She said the residents in room [ROOM NUMBER] and 20 did not use their bathroom but Resident # 20 in room [ROOM NUMBER] used her bathroom and Resident # 39 wandered and would use all the bathrooms on the hall. She said she had never thought about checking the cords to ensure they could be reached from the floor and pulled if needed. She said she guessed that it would be the aides and maintenance directors' responsibility to check the call lights. She said if the light was not able to be pulled then staff wouldn't know they needed help. During an observation on 9/03/24 at 11:00 am revealed Resident #39 was observed wandering the hall and in and out of rooms on the women's secured unit. During an interview on 09/04/24 at 3:46 pm the maintenance director who said he had been at the facility for almost a year. He said he was responsible for checking all the call lights in the facility. He said he checked the call lights weekly to see that they worked, were not wrapped around the grab bar, or tied in knots. He said if he found a call light wrapped or tied, he corrected them and then advised the staff not to wrap or tie them in knots. He said if the light was wrapped or tied the resident could not use in case of an emergency because the string would not pull to set off the alarm. He said if the alarm could not go off the resident could possibly not get help. During an interview on 09/05/24 at 9:14 am the Administrator who said the maintenance director was responsible for checking all call lights in the facility and should be doing checks monthly and as needed. She said the CNA's should also be monitoring and making sure the call lights were able to be pulled for activation but had not done any specific training on this prior to this event. She said the risk of the call light not being able to be activated could cause delay of services and expected call light cords to not be wrapped or tied and able to be pulled to alert staff of any needs. Record review of a facility policy titled Call System, Resident dated September 2022 reflected, .each resident is provided with a means to call staff for assistance from his/her bed, toileting/bathing facilities and from the floor .
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary services to maintain personal h...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary services to maintain personal hygiene for 3 of 16 residents reviewed for ADLs (Residents #3, Resident #19, and Resident #9). 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #19's face and bed linens were clean when her eyes had drainage present to the corners of both of her eyes and when her bed linens were visibly dirty with brown stains and the comforter had dark brown stained substances on 9/3/2024. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3 received timely incontinent care on 9/4/2024 when the resident was observed walking throughout the facility with wet pants. 3. The facility failed to clean or groom Resident #9 fingernails on 9/3/2024-9/4/2024. These failures could place residents who required assistance from staff for ADLs at risk of not receiving care and services to meet their needs which could result in poor care, risk for skin breakdown, feelings of poor self-esteem, lack of dignity, and health. Findings included: 1. Record review of a face sheet for Resident #19 dated 9/4/2024 reflected she admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was [AGE] years old with diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (brain disorder that causes memory loss, thinking problems and behavior changes) major depressive disorder (persistent feeling of sadness or loss of interest), heart failure (inability of the heart to pump effectively) and chronic kidney disease stage 4 (severe loss of kidney function). Record review a task schedule for September 2024 for Resident #19 reflected ADL bathing was done on q shift on Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday and last time documented was on 9/3/2024 at 10:31 PM. Nursing rehab: dressing/grooming-resident will use washcloth to cleanse face and will brush teeth with set up help from staff x1 every shift was documented on 9/1/2024 and 9/2/2024, 9/3/2024 and 9/4/2024 were blank. Record review of a Quarterly MDS Assessment for Resident #19 dated 7/24/2024 reflected she had severe impairment in thinking with a BIMS score of 6. She required partial/moderate assistance with eating, oral hygiene, and personal hygiene. She was always incontinent of bladder and bowel. Record review of a care plan for Resident #19 revised on 4/8/2023 reflected she had an ADL Self Care Performance Deficit related to Alzheimer's disease. Interventions for bathing indicated she was totally dependent on staff to provide a bath 3 times weekly and as necessary. During an observation and interview on 9/3/2024 at 9:29 AM revealed Resident #19 was in her room, in bed awake with the covers pulled up to her neck when Resident #19 said she had been at the facility for about a month. Her face had dried eye drainage on the inner corners of both of her eyes. Her comforter was visibly dirty. During an observation and interview on 9/3/2024 at 4:55 revealed Resident #19 was in her room, in bed dressed, dried eye drainage present to the corners of both of her eyes. She said she received her showers on Tuesday and Sunday and thought the staff changed her linens that day. The top sheet on her bed was hanging off the foot of the bed and visibly dirty with brown stains and the comforter still had dark brown stained substances all over. During an observation and interview on 9/3/2024 at 5:10 PM, CNA B was in the room with Resident #19 and said she assisted Resident #19 earlier that day and she wiped her face that morning. She said she had been employed at the facility for 2 weeks and worked 6am-6pm. She said she changed her linens after lunch that day. She said if linens were wet or soiled, they were supposed to change everything on the bed. She said after lunch that day, she did not change the fitted sheet on the bed and all she changed was the blanket that was underneath her buttocks. She observed the linens on the bed and said they were dirty along with the comforter. She said if she was a resident and depended on staff to provide care to her and the linens were dirty and her face was not clean, she would be mad. She said she did clean Resident #19 face that afternoon after lunch, but her eyes had been matted up for a couple of days. She said she was not sure if the nurse was aware or not. 2. Record review of an admission Record dated 9/4/2024 for Resident #3 reflected he admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was [AGE] years old with diagnoses of major depressive disorder (persistent sadness or loss of interest), mild intellectual disabilities (a condition that limits intelligence and disrupts abilities necessary for living independently), and hypertension. Record review of a Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #3 reflected he had moderate impairment in thinking with a BIMS score of 10. He required supervision or touching assistance with toileting hygiene. He was always continent of urine and always incontinent of bowel. Record review of a care plan revised on 4/30/2023 for Resident #3 reflected he had a behavior related to wearing urine- soaked clothes, drying out urine-soaked clothes in his room and then wearing once dried. Interventions included if reasonable, discuss the resident's behavior. Explain/reinforce why behavior is inappropriate and/or unacceptable. Intervene as necessary to protect the rights and safety of others. He had an ADL Self Care Performance Deficit with interventions for toilet use he required staff assistance x1 to use the toilet. He had bladder incontinence with interventions to check every 2 hours and as required for incontinence. Change clothing prn after incontinent episodes. During an observation on 9/4/2024 at 7:50 AM revealed Resident #3 was walking down the hall wearing gray pants headed to the nurse desk where the Medication Aide was standing. Resident #3 asked the Medication Aide about his medications and the Medication Aide told him he would bring his medications to him in the dining room. The back of the resident's pants was dark in color and looked like they were wet. During an observation and interview on 9/4/2024 at 8:45 AM revealed Resident #3 was sitting in the dining room with his Best Friend. The Best Friend said she had been with the resident for 6-7 months from 8 am-10 am Monday-Friday. Resident #3 was listening to gospel inspirations. The Best Friend said when she visited the resident in the mornings, he was always dressed and would assist him with getting out clothes for him and the staff would put them on him. She said at times he would be wet from urine and was resistive to care. She said he understood when staff would tell him that his clothes were wet and would allow the staff to change him if needed. She said he wore briefs but would take them off and would remove his wet clothes and put them in the drawers in his room. She said he could go to the restroom on his own but at times would have accidents. During an observation and interview on 9/4/2024 at 10:20 AM revealed Resident #3 was in his room lying in bed with a light pink blanket being used as a under pad. There were not any linens on the bed. Resident #3 said they took them away because they were wet. He had a wet pair of pants lying on his over bed table in the room. Housekeeping staff entered the room and started sweeping the floor. Observation revealed Resident #3 was in bed wearing the same gray pair of pants from earlier that day (09/04/2024 at 7:50 AM) and they were wet. During an interview on 9/4/2024 at 10:25 AM HSK A said she had been at the facility for a few months and worked hall C where Resident #3 resided. She said Resident #3 stayed wet all the time and would have his wet clothes on the tables or in the drawers drying out. She said a lot of times there would not be any linens on his bed when she went into the room to clean. During an observation and interview on 9/4/2024 at 10:55 AM revealed Resident #3 was sitting on a couch in dining room watching tv and had on a different pair of pants that were blue in color. Resident #3 said the staff changed his pants because the other pants were wet. During an interview on 9/4/2024 at 10:58 AM CNA B said she was assigned to the hall for Resident #3 on today 9/4/2024. She said earlier that morning on 9/4/2024, she had to change his linens on his bed because they were wet, and his bed was soaked. She said he did not allow some of the staff to assist him with care. She said this morning on 9/4/2024, when his bed was wet, she did not put any linens back on the bed because the mattress was soaked and was letting it air out. She said she was not able to dry the mattress because they did not have enough towels at the time. She said the resident had accidents at times. CNA B said she was not aware the resident had gone back to bed earlier in the day after breakfast and his bed did not have any linens on the bed. During an interview on 9/4/2024 at 11:08 AM the DON who said Resident #3 would only allow certain people to assist with providing care to him. She said he was frequently wet and would refuse showers. She said the resident was easily redirected. She said they recently had an in-service regarding Resident #3 with staff as they were constantly having to tell the resident that his clothes were wet. She said he was ambulatory. She said they did have a problem recently with the facility not having enough towels and washcloths, but they purchased more and had not been told that they were low again. She said linens should be changed when they were soiled or when wet and on shower days. She said going forward she would provide more training to the staff as they have a lot of newer staff employed at the facility. She said she would hope that if she had a loved one or herself that they would get the care they needed. During an interview on 9/5/2024 at 9:20 AM, the Administrator who said linens should be changed as needed and on shower days. She said she purchased 2 cases of sheets about a week ago and told the staff if sheets were stained, they were told to let laundry know and not leave them there until they are washed. She said they have addressed to staff about Resident #3 and required them to redirect him a lot to change his clothes, he would wet himself and hang his clothes in his room to dry. She said going forward she would educate staff on all residents that were dependent to provide care and help them and would be doing checks to make sure that Resident #3 was not wet. She said her expectations were for the staff to follow their care plans and they should be redirecting Resident #3, bed should be kept clean and dry, and should be helping with the resident's appearance and making sure they were clean when going to bed. She said it would make her feel very bad and probably would not want to get out of bed and would be embarrassed. Record review of an in-service dated 4/20/2023 was conducted at the facility regarding Resident #3 that reflected when assigned to Halls C and D, once every shift a CNA was to go into the room of Resident #3 and obtain any dirty/soiled linen out of the dresser drawers and take to laundry to be washed. 3. Record review of a facility face sheet dated 9/4/24 for Resident #9 reflected that he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and subsequently readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including: Depression, dementia, and anxiety disorder. Record review of a Comprehensive MDS assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #9 reflected that he had a BIMS score of 7, which indicated that he had a severe cognitive impairment. Assessment indicated he had not had behaviors of rejecting care. He was dependent with personal hygiene. Record review of a comprehensive care plan dated 10/11/22 for Resident #9 reflected that he had an ADL self-care deficit and interventions included to .Check nail length and trim and clean on bath day and as necessary . During an observation on 9/2/24 at 9:21 am Resident #9 was observed in common area of men's secured unit in a wheelchair. He did not speak at this time. He was observed with long, dirty fingernails. During an interview on 9/3/24 at 9:25 am CNA D said the CNAs were responsible for keeping the resident's nails clean and groomed. During an observation on 9/3/24 at 12:00 pm revealed Resident #9 was observed in common area/dining room of men's secured unit. He was sitting at a table in his wheelchair waiting for lunch. He was observed with long nails. He kept fidgeting with them like he was trying to clean out from underneath them with his other nails. Multiple nails were observed to be dirty underneath with the third finger on his right hand observed with a black substance underneath. During an observation and interview on 9/4/24 at 10:10 am revealed Resident #9 was observed in common area of men's secured unit up in wheelchair He talked about serving in Vietnam and meeting [NAME] W. Bush. He was fidgeting with his nails while talking as if he was trying to clean them. His nails are still observed to be dirty with a black substance underneath several nails. When asked if his nails were bothering him, he said yes, they seem to be. When asked if he would like his nails cleaned and groomed, he said Yes, I would like them done when someone gets a chance to do it. During an interview on 9/4/2024 at 11:25 AM DON said that CNAs should perform nail care on the residents anytime it was needed, but at least on bath days. She said residents could be at risk of scratches and skin tears if nail care was not done. During an interview on 9/5/24 at 9:18 am Administrator said she expected her staff to provide nail care according to what their care plan said and that residents could be at risk of scratching their skin and getting infections. Record review of a facility policy titled Fingernails/Toenails, Care of dated 2001, revised in February 2018 reflected .The purposes of this procedure are to clean the nail bed, to keep nails trimmed, and to prevent infections . and .Nail care includes daily cleaning and regular trimming . Record review of a facility polity titled Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), Supporting revised March 2018 reflected, .Residents who are unable to carry out daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene. 2. Appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADLs independently, with the consent of the resident and in accordance with the plan of care, including appropriate support and assistance with: a. Hygiene (bathing, dressing, grooming, and oral care); 7. The resident's response to interventions
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0805 (Tag F0805)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received and the facility prov...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received and the facility provided food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs for 5 of 5 residents (Residents #13, #25, #26, #36, and #42) reviewed for puree diets. The facility failed to prepare the pureed diet to the consistency required for Residents #13, #25, #26, #36, and #42 on 9/4/24. This failure could place residents who received pureed foods at risk of not having nutritional needs met by consuming foods that could cause choking and decreased meal intakes. Findings included: 1. Record review of a facility face sheet dated 9/3/24 for Resident #13 indicated that he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including: Alzheimer's, aphasia (loss of ability to understand or express speech, caused by brain damage), and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Record review of a Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #13 reflected that he had a BIMS score of 9, which reflected that he had moderate cognitive impairment. He required supervision assistance with eating. Record review of a comprehensive care plan revised on 8/6/24 reflected that he had a swallowing problem, received a pureed diet and interventions included to follow diet as prescribed. Record review of a Physician's Order Summary Report dated 9/3/24 indicated the following diet order dated 9/6/23: .Regular diet, pureed texture . 2. Record review of a facility face sheet dated 9/5/24 for Resident #25 reflected that he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including: urinary tract infection and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Record review of a comprehensive MDS assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #25 reflected that had a BIMS score of 9, which reflected that he had moderate cognitive impairment. He was dependent with eating. Record review of a comprehensive care plan dated 9/26/23 for Resident #25 indicated that he was at risk for potential nutritional problems and interventions included to provide and serve diet as ordered. Record review of a Physician's Order Summary Report dated 9/5/24 for Resident #25 indicated that he had the following order dated 8/16/24: .No salt on tray diet, pureed texture . 3. Record review of a facility face sheet dated 9/6/24 for Resident #26 indicated that she was an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and subsequently readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including: Alzheimer's and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Record review of a Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #26 indicated that Brief Interview for Mental Status should not be completed due to resident being rarely/never understood. She had severely impaired cognition. She required partial/moderate assistance with eating. Record review of a comprehensive care plan dated 8/19/24 for Resident #26 indicated that she was at risk for nutritional problems and received a pureed diet. Interventions included to provide and serve diet as ordered. Record review of a Physician's Order Summary Report dated 9/6/24 for Resident #26 indicated that she had the following order dated 8/8/24 .Regular diet, pureed texture . 4. Record review of a facility face sheet dated 9/6/24 for Resident #36 indicated that she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and subsequently readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including: acute pancreatitis (inflammation of the pancreas that causes abdominal pain and can affect other organs) and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Record review of a Comprehensive MDS assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #36 indicated that Brief Interview for Mental Status should not be completed due to resident being rarely/never understood. She had severely impaired cognition. She required partial/moderate assistance with eating. Record review of a comprehensive care plan dated 8/19/24 for Resident #36 indicated that she had a potential for nutritional problem and received a puree diet. Interventions included to provide and serve diet as ordered. Record review of a Physician's Order Summary Report dated 9/6/24 for Resident #36 indicated that she had the following order dated 8/17/24: .No salt on tray diet, pureed texture . 5. Record review of a facility face sheet dated 9/6/24 for Resident #42 indicated that he was an [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including: Dementia, pneumonia (an infection in the lungs), and dysphagia (trouble swallowing). Record review of a Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #42 indicated that he had a BIMS score of 13, which indicated that he was cognitively intact. He required set up or clean up assistance with eating. Record review of a comprehensive care plan dated 8/12/24 for Resident #42 indicated that he had a potential for nutritional problem and received a pureed diet. Interventions included to provide and serve diet as ordered. Record review of a Physician's Order Summary Report dated 9/6/24 for Resident #42 indicated that he had the following order dated 4/27/24: .regular diet, pureed texture . During an observation on 9/4/24 at 11:45 am revealed [NAME] F was pureeing foods for noon meal. She pureed the meat; she said it was still too grainy and pureed it again. After pureeing a second time, she said it was much better. Surveyor asked [NAME] F if they ever tasted the pureed foods for texture and she said that she did not. DM was also in kitchen and said that she did taste the food for texture as needed. DM nor [NAME] F tasted the meat after pureeing. During an observation and joint interview on 9/4/24 at 12:40 pm to 12:45 pm surveyors received test tray of regular and pureed foods. Pureed meat was visibly lumpy and had a chewy texture to it. Pureed greens were stringy in texture. Administrator and DM were both brought to room to taste puree food. Administrator said the texture was not smooth and DM said meat was too grainy and greens were stringy. DM said if pureed foods were not served at the correct texture, residents receiving puree diets could be at risk of choking. During an interview on 9/5/24 at 9:18 am Administrator said residents who need pureed diets could be at risk of swallowing issues and aspiration. She said they would be providing education to dietary staff to ensure pureed foods were served at the correct consistency going forward. She said she expected her staff to serve foods in the correct texture. During a telephone interview on 9/5/24 at 10:02 am Corporate Dietician said they check purees every time they come to facility. She said she expects a pudding like consistency without lumps. She said she had started an in-service yesterday (9/4/24) with the dietary staff for pureed foods. She said she expected the cooks to taste the pureed foods for texture before serving. She said residents requiring puree foods could be at risk of choking if served the wrong consistency foods. Record review of a facility policy titled Therapeutic Diets dated 2001 and revised October 2017 read .A therapeutic diet is considered a diet ordered by a physician, practitioner, or dietician as part of treatment for a disease or clinical condition, to modify specific nutrients in the diet, or to alter the texture of a diet, for example: .d. Altered consistency diet . Record review of a Guidance Form for puree foods provided by facility and put out by International Dysphagia Diet Standard Initiative read .Pureed food for adults .do not require chewing .and .have a smooth texture with no lumps .
Mar 2024 2 deficiencies 1 IJ
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for 1 of 7 reside...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for resident abuse. The facility did not ensure Resident #1 was free from abuse when CNA A pushed and struck Resident #1 on his face causing him to fall. The noncompliance was identified as PNC (past non-compliance). The IJ (immediate jeopardy) began on 10/04/2023 and ended 10/05/2023. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. This failure could place residents at risk of physical harm, mental anguish, or emotional distress. Findings include: Record review of a facility face sheet dated 03/12/2024 indicated Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old male that admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted [DATE] with diagnoses of Unspecified Dementia (altered thinking, usually due to aging process), psychotic disturbances with delusions (a mental disorder characterized by a disconnection with reality), and Alzheimer's disease (a neurodegenerative disease with moods swings and difficulty remembering). Record review of an admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #1 had a BIMS of 09 indicating moderate impaired cognition. Section C indicated inattention and disorganized thinking were continuously present. Record review of comprehensive care plan with revision date of 11/29/2023 for Resident #1 revealed the care plan had been updated on 10/05/2023 with focus: The resident has a psychosocial well-being problem/potential related to physical aggression received. 10/04/2023 - Resident threw water on a staff member and staff member retaliated by shoving resident and hitting him on left side of face causing him to fall. Goal: The resident will have no psychosocial well-being problem by/through review. Interventions included: 10/05/2023 - CNA involved in incident suspended pending investigation and police notified and statements given, head to toe assessment, emotional distress assessment, and hall safe survey performed on all residents on A hall. Resident sent to emergency room for evaluation and neuro checks will be completed on return from hospital. Monitor/document residents' feelings relative to isolation, unhappiness, anger, or loss. Record review of a facility event report dated 10/04/2023 at 7:45 p.m. indicated CNA A reported Resident #1 had fallen in the dining area and did not hit his head. Resident #1 was assessed, and no injuries found, resident denied pain and was unable to give a description of what had happened. Record review of a facility event dated 10/05/2023 at 10:45 a.m. indicated the Administrator had reviewed video footage of the above reported incident in the dining area of the men's locked unit. It was reported to the nurse by the CNA that resident fell in the dining room. It was reported that resident did not hit his head. The nurse assessed resident and did not see any injuries. However, the morning of 10/05/2023, upon review of the surveillance cameras to see how the fall occurred, it was seen that resident (Resident #1) and CNA (CNA A) were standing by the water cooler in the dining room on A hall. CNA and resident are seen conversing with each other, and resident (Resident #1) becomes agitated and tosses a cup of water at the CNA, splashing her in the face and front of her shirt. CNA (CNA A) then reaches out and shoves resident on the shoulder and hits him (with what appears to be an open hand) across the left side of his head. Resident stumbles backwards, tripping, and falls on the floor, hitting his back on the chair behind him and his head on the chair seat. The CNA then walks away and gets a towel for her shirt. Record review of an emergency room summary report dated 10/05/2023 indicated Resident #1 had CT (computed tomography) scans of the head, face, spine, neck, chest, abdomen, and pelvis with no negative findings and was discharged back to the facility with no new orders. Record review of an employee file for CNA A indicated a hire date of 08/28/2023. The file included a termination report for CNA A with a suspension date of 10/05/2023 and termination dated 10/06/2023 due to workplace violence, violating federal or state care standards and was signed by the Administrator and DON. A completed criminal history check, nurse aide registry check and referrals indicated CNA A had an active certification and was employable. CNA A had completed abuse training on 08/24/2023 before her active hire date on 08/28/23. During an interview and observation on 03/11/2024 at 10:00 am CNA D was assisting CNA C with Resident #1 preparations for a shower. Resident #1 was walking in the hallway to the shower room. When asked if he was doing well today, Resident #1 looked up and nodded yes. CNA D stated he had cared for Resident #1 since his admission in September of 2023 to the male locked unit. CNA C said he has worked the unit for 10 years and resident altercations of abuse and must be reported to the administrator immediately. He said it is difficult with the A Hall locked unit being all male but by working with them for so long he can recognize a mood change and intervene early but sometimes the newer residents you don't know their signs yet. He said that Resident #1 he gets aggravated quickly and will strike out towards other residents and staff. He said Resident #1 had been to the Psych hospital after the incident on 10/04/23. He said he had been better recently. CNA C said all abuse physical, verbal, mental, financial, and sexual was to be reported immediately to the administrator. He said if a resident reports something it was his responsibility to report so the resident was protected. He said once things are reported the administrator starts her investigation and reports the abuse to the state. He said that residents have to be able to report without being afraid and no staff should retaliate against a resident or family for reporting. CNA C said if retaliation occurs the administrator will terminate them. He said he has been trained on deescalating behaviors and how to deal with difficult behaviors. He said at no time can a staff member hit a resident. During an interview on 03/11/2024 at 3:14 pm LVN C said he has worked at the facility for 1 ½ years and resident altercations are reported to the DON and Admin. He said he tries to recognize a behavior change early before an altercation occurs but does not always work that way. He said if an altercation occurs residents are separated and depending on the severity 1:1 and or every 5 min checks are done. 1:1 continues until behavioral hospital admission or psych MD evaluates and makes changes, it really depends on the resident and their behaviors. No 2 incidents are the same. LVN C said he has been trained on abuse and knows the types of abuse: physical, verbal, sexual, mental and financial. He said no one is to take any resident belongings or money at no time. He said that all forms of abuse must be reported immediately to the administrator and then management starts their investigation. He said all abuse should be reported to the state. He said no matter how difficult the resident is never okay to hit or harm them. He said they have been trained on how to report abuse, preventing abuse, dealing with dementia and how to deescalate behaviors and to use those training tools to deal with difficult residents. During an interview on 3/11/2024 at 4:00 pm the Administrator said she would see if she could retrieve the video footage of the incident involving Resident #1 and CNA A, since it had been some time since the incident of abuse occurred on 10/04/23. The Administrator said she gave the Chief of Police a copy for his investigation when she reported the abuse to the required authorities. The Administrator said she reported to the police department, HHS, the Ombudsman, Resident #1's medical doctor and psychiatric doctor and his family after she saw the footage of the strike made by CNA A. She said the DON received orders to send Resident #1 to the emergency room for evaluation. Resident #1 had several CT scans and returned to the facility, there were no injuries. The Administrator said the staff were in serviced on 10/05/23 on numerous topics to prevent and ensure reporting and she would provide evidence of those trainings. She said the incident was reviewed by the QAPI team on 10/05/23 to determine if any other topics needed to be addressed. During an interview on 03/12/2024 at 10:20 am with the Chief of Police, he said there was an open case #OR- 100423-01 for the arrest of CNA A. He said he had conducted an investigation after receiving a report of abuse from the facility Administrator on 10/05/23 at 10:55 am. The Chief of Police said the administrator had advised him when she arrived at work on the morning of 10/05/23 she had been advised that one of the residents (Resident #1) had gotten disruptive during the evening of 10/04/23 and had fallen but had no injuries. The Chief of Police said the Administrator had told him she located the video footage of the dining area for viewing, as she usually does after an incident in the area. The Administrator was able to determine the event was not as previously reported by the CNA, as the resident (Resident #1) was pushed and hit by CNA A and had not just fallen as reported by CNA A. The Chief of Police said he had viewed the video footage of the incident on 10/04/2023 involving Resident #1 and CNA A provided to him by the Administrator. He said he had concluded his investigation, which included assessing for injuries and making pictures of the resident at the facility but was not able to document any injuries from the resident being hit and knocked down. He said based on the video evidence which shows the suspect intentionally and knowingly striking an elderly person over the age of 65 ([AGE] years of age) with a closed fist, causing bodily injury, a warrant for injury to the elderly was requested. The Chief said there was an open warrant for CNA A's arrest, but she had not been apprehended yet. He said that most likely until she had a traffic violation or another issue, it would remain outstanding. Record review of a facility policy titled Abuse and Neglect-Clinical Protocol dated March 2018 indicated Abuse is defined as the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish. Abuse includes deprivation by an individual, including a caretaker or goods or services that are necessary to attain or maintain physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Instances of abuse of all residents, irrespective of any mental, or physical condition, cause physical harm, pain or mental anguish. It includes verbal abuse, sexual abuse, physical abuse, and mental abuse including abuse facilitated or enabled through the use of technology .willful means the individual must have acted deliberately, not that the individual must have intended to inflict injury or harm . Treatment/Management 3. The physician will order measures required to address the consequences of an abuse situation. The facility took the following action to correct the non-compliance on 10/05/2023: The facility conducted a physical assessment including skin assessments on all residents in the locked unit, safe surveys were completed on all residents 10/05/2023. In-services included: Retaliation, abuse, preventing resident accidents and incidents, Reporting abuse to the abuse coordinator, Reporting abuse to facility management, Recognizing signs and symptoms of abuse, Abuse investigations, Abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation-reporting and investigating, Investigating resident injuries, Quick safety de-escalation in healthcare, Preventing accidents and incidents, were conducted with all staff on 10/05/2024 then was referred to QAPI (quality assurance performance improvement) committee for efficacy of plan and monitoring frequency. Record Review of a QAPI meeting dated 10/05/2023 indicated the committee meet for discussion of the event involving abuse. A Performance Improvement plan was developed including all reviewed trainings and assessments on 10/05/2023. Record review of an In-service Training report named Retaliation, abuse, preventing resident accidents and incidents, dated 10/05/2023 and conducted by the DON to the facility staff included: Complaints are reported in good faith, it is illegal for the facility or any employee to intimidate or retaliate in any way against the resident or the family reporting. Record review of an In-service Training report named Reporting abuse to the abuse coordinator dated 10/05/2023 and conducted by the DON to the facility staff included: The abuse coordinator is the administrator. Record review on an In-service Training report named Reporting abuse to facility management dated 10/05/23 conducted by the DON to facility staff included: Condemnation of resident abuse, retribution for reporting abuse, responsibility of reporting resident abuse, notifying agencies/individuals of resident abuse, notifying administration of resident abuse, methods of resident abuse, contents of notice of abuse. Record review on an In-service Training report named Recognizing signs and symptoms of abuse/neglect, dated 10/05/23 conducted by the DON to facility staff included: signs and symptoms of abuse, neglect, and psychological abuse and neglect. Record review on an In-service Training report named Abuse investigations, to facility staff dated 10/05/23 conducted by the DON to facility staff included: Nursing facility must report no later than two hours after an allegation is made for abuse. The investigation process including all reports of abuse/neglect and injuries will be promptly reported and investigated. Record review on an In-service Training report named Abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation- reporting and investigating, to facility management dated 10/05/23 conducted by the DON to facility staff included: Definitions of Abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation, steps of reporting and investigations. Record review on an In-service Training report named Investigating resident injuries, to facility staff dated 10/05/23 conducted by the DON to facility staff included: Facility policy stating all resident injuries are investigated. Record review on an In-service Training report named Quick safety de-escalation in healthcare, to facility management dated 10/05/23 conducted by the DON to facility staff included: De-escalation is the first line response to prevent potential violence and aggression. Record review on an In-service Training report named Preventing accidents and incidents, to facility staff dated 10/05/23 conducted by the DON to facility staff included: Facility will work to prevent any accident or incident. The facility will change the plan of care in the event of an accident and or incident. All new hires will continue to be required to complete the abuse training on hire as required by regulation. Interviews with staff members, (CNA A, CNA B, CNA C LVN E, LVN F) starting at 11:45 am - 2:00 pm on 03/12/2024, revealed they were in-serviced and verbalized training regarding Abuse. All 5 staff members (CNA A, CNA B, CNA C LVN E, LVN F) could identify understanding of Retaliation, abuse, preventing resident accidents and incidents. All 5 staff members (CNA A, CNA B, CNA C LVN E, LVN F) verbalized understanding of when to report abuse to the abuse coordinator, All 5 staff members (CNA A, CNA B, CNA C LVN E, LVN F) verbalized when Reporting abuse to facility management, All 5 staff members (CNA A, CNA B, CNA C LVN E, LVN F) verbalized when Recognizing signs and symptoms of abuse, All 5 staff members (CNA A, CNA B, CNA C LVN E, LVN F) verbalized understanding of Abuse investigations, All 5 staff members (CNA A, CNA B, CNA C LVN E, LVN F) verbalized understanding Abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation-reporting and investigating. All 5 staff members (CNA A, CNA B, CNA C LVN E, LVN F) verbalized understanding of Investigating resident injuries. All 5 staff members (CNA A, CNA B, CNA C LVN E, LVN F) verbalized understanding of Quick safety de-escalation in healthcare. All 5 staff members (CNA A, CNA B, CNA C LVN E, LVN F) verbalized understanding of Preventing accidents and incidents. During an interview on 03/12/2024 at 3:00 pm the Administrator stated she expected her staff to report any abuse, neglect or exploitation. She said that retaliation was not tolerated. She stated that the monitoring would continue with the facility QAPI meetings. During an interview on 3/12/2024 at 3:15 pm the DON said she expected all staff to treat the residents with dignity and respect. The DON said that abuse will not be tolerated in the facility and any staff members that is accused of abuse will be immediately placed on suspension and terminated pending the investigation. The DON said her focus is now on her hiring process to ensure that quality staff members are brought into the facility. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The IJ began on 10/04/2023 and ended 10/05/2023. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. .
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0602 (Tag F0602)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to be free from misappropriation of ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to be free from misappropriation of resident property for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for misappropriation. The facility failed to prevent misappropriation of property when NA H took money via bank card in the amount of $202.50. The noncompliance was identified as PNC (past non-compliance) The noncompliance was began on 02/29/2024 and ended 03/04/2024. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before survey began. This failure could place residents at risk of misappropriation which could lead to further exploitation of other residents. Findings included: Record review of Resident #2's electronic face sheet, dated 03/03/2024, indicated that he was a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Dysphagia, (difficulty swallowing), Atrial Fibrillation (an abnormal heart rhythm), Abnormalities of gait and mobility, Morbid obesity, hypertension (high blood pressure), and acute and chronic respiratory failure. Record review of MDS dated [DATE], indicated that Resident #2 was understood by others and understood others. Resident #2 had a BIMS of 11, which indicates moderate cognitive impairment. Record review of comprehensive care plan, dated 9/14/2023, indicated resident #2 had an ADL self-care performance deficit related to leg amputation and requires extensive assistance with bed mobility, dressing, and bathing. Resident #2 is care planed for dependence on staff for activities, cognitive stimulation and social interaction related to immobility and physical limitations. Care plan dated 3/03/2024 for Resident #2 indicated that he had a potential psychosocial well-being problem related to Resident #2 gave employee money for her light bill. During an interview on 3/11/2024 at 10:30 AM, the administrator said that on 3/3/2024 Resident #2 reported he had paid for NA H's electric bill and that she had agreed to pay him back the next day on payday . The administrator reported the incident to local law enforcement and the Ombudsman Record review of witness statement, dated 3/3/2024, by Resident #2 indicated that he had paid $309.00 on 2/28/2024 on NA H's electric bill, she had withdrawn $200.00 from his account at an ATM, bought 3 packs of cigarettes using his money and that he had given her $20.00 and $10.00. His statement indicated that NA H was to pay him back on 2/29/2024. Record review of witness statement, dated 3/3/2024, by NA H indicated that Resident #2 would request that NA H would provide personal care and that he had asked her to kiss his penis while providing incontinent care. She said that Resident #2 offered her $100.00 to allow him to touch her breast on 3/1/2024. NA H denied any inappropriate touching and denied receiving any money from Resident #2. Record review of local Police Department Incident report dated 3/3/2024 showed the incident that was reported to facility on 3/3/2024 was reported to police and that event was under investigation at that time. Law enforcement obtained a photo from electronic monitoring device of local store dated 2/27/2024 with time stamp that had NA H using the ATM. Resident #2 provided electronic bank statement that had a $202.50 withdrawal that occurred on 2/27/2024 at the same time and location. Resident #2 also provided proof of a $309.92 transaction to a local electric company. Record review of safe survey performed on 3/3/2024 on 10 residents by social worker revealed initially all residents denied giving money to staff members or recalled being asked for money. During an interview on 3/12/2024 at 1:00 PM, the Business Office Manager said that she was responsible for residents' money. She said that if a resident wants to access cash, she completes a form and the resident signs for any money given. She said that residents are limited to $60.00 a day but can come in multiple times a week if they wish to withdraw more money. She said that any items purchased for the residents require a receipt and that the resident signs the receipt as proof of how money is spent. The BOM stated that Resident #2 manages his own money. She said that he has his own banking account and that she goes to his room every third week of the month to have him sign a paper to allow the facility to draft his monthly payment from his account. During an interview on 3/12/2024 at 1:20 PM LVN G said that she was on duty the date that the incident on 3/3/2024 was reported. She was the nurse that took the statement from Resident #2. She said that the resident was upset that NA H did not want to take care of him and was uncomfortable being in his room. She said that Resident #2 told her that he had paid for NA H's electricity and that she was going to pay him back, but she had not given the money back on the day she stated she would. LVN G said that no other residents had reported to her that money was taken or that any employee had asked them for money. During an interview on 3/12/2024 at 2:00 PM the DON said that NA H had been hired as a housekeeper and had recently transferred to a hospitality aide position. She said that NA H had a CNA certification in the past and did not renew her certification but was interested in restoring her certification. The DON said that NA H had only worked as a hospitality aide for a week prior to the incident that was reported. She was not aware of any complaints prior to the one on 3/3/2024. She said that all staff must complete training on abuse, neglect, and exploitation upon hire, which includes housekeeping staff. Training includes definitions of Abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation, steps of reporting and investigations. Record review of NA H's Personnel File indicated a hire date of 01/14/2024. Preventing, Recognizing, and Reporting Abuse training was completed on 1/14/2024. A change in status from housekeeping to hospitality aide was 2/27/2024. Record review of Associate Separation Report dated 3/4/2024 and signed 3/8/2024 indicated that NA H was terminated as a result of the investigation of the incident reported on 3/3/2024 . The facility took the following actions to correct the non-compliance on 03/03/2024: Records review of staff training dated 3/3/2024 conducted by DON included Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation of Residents, Abuse Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program, Compliance and Ethics- Risk Areas for Fraud and Abuse, Coordinating/Implementing Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Policies and Procedures and Recognizing Signs and Symptoms of Abuse/Neglect. Record review on an In-service Training report named Abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation- reporting and investigating, to facility management dated 3/3/2024 conducted by the DON to facility staff included: Definitions of Abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation, steps of reporting and investigations. Condemnation of resident abuse, retribution for reporting abuse, responsibility of reporting resident abuse, notifying agencies/individuals of resident abuse, notifying administration of resident abuse, methods of resident abuse, contents of notice of abuse. Record review of QAPI meeting dated 3/3/2024 indicated the committee met for discussion of the event involving misappropriation. A performance approval plan was developed including ongoing monitoring of trainings and assessments of residents involved in the incident. Interviews with staff members, (CNA A, CNA B, CNA C LVN E, LVN F) starting at 11:45 am - 2:00 pm on 03/12/2024, revealed they were in-serviced and verbalized training regarding Abuse. All 5 staff members (CNA A, CNA B, CNA C LVN E, LVN F) could identify understanding of Retaliation, abuse, preventing resident accidents and incidents. All 5 staff members (CNA A, CNA B, CNA C LVN E, LVN F) verbalized understanding of when to report abuse to the abuse coordinator, All 5 staff members (CNA A, CNA B, CNA C LVN E, LVN F) verbalized when Reporting abuse to facility management, All 5 staff members (CNA A, CNA B, CNA C LVN E, LVN F) verbalized when Recognizing signs and symptoms of abuse, All 5 staff members (CNA A, CNA B, CNA C LVN E, LVN F) verbalized understanding of Abuse investigations, All 5 staff members (CNA A, CNA B, CNA C LVN E, LVN F) verbalized understanding Abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation-reporting and investigating. All 5 staff members (CNA A, CNA B, CNA C LVN E, LVN F) verbalized understanding of Investigating resident injuries. All 5 staff members (CNA A, CNA B, CNA C LVN E, LVN F) verbalized understanding of Quick safety de-escalation in healthcare. All 5 staff members (CNA A, CNA B, CNA C LVN E, LVN F) verbalized understanding of Preventing accidents and incidents. During an interview on 03/12/2024 at 3:00 pm the Administrator stated she expected her staff to report any abuse, neglect or exploitation. She said that retaliation was not tolerated. She stated that the monitoring would continue with the facility QAPI meetings. During an interview on 3/12/2024 at 3:15 pm the DON said she expected all staff to treat the residents with dignity and respect. The DON said that abuse will not be tolerated in the facility and any staff members that is accused of abuse will be immediately placed on suspension and terminated pending the investigation. The DON said her focus is now on her hiring process to ensure that quality staff members are brought into the facility. Record review of a policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program revised April 2021, stated residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation.protect residents from misappropriation of property by anyone including facility staff develop and implement policies and protocols to prevent and identify .theft, exploitation or misappropriation of resident property. The noncompliance was identified as PNC (past non-compliance) The noncompliance was began on 02/29/2024 and ended 03/04/2024. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before survey began.
Aug 2023 12 deficiencies 3 IJ
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Resident Rights (Tag F0550)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for resident rights (Resident # 46 and Resident #54) in that: On 6/19/23 CNA A took a video of Resident # 46 on the secured unit of him kicking the door and posted the video on social media. On 6/19/23 CNA A took a video of Resident # 54 on the secured unit of him making inappropriate sexual advances and posted the video on social media. The non-compliance was identified as past non-compliance. The IJ began on 6/19/23 and ended on 6/19/23. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before survey began. This failure could place residents at risk of abuse, humiliation, intimidation, fear, shame, agitation, and decreased quality of life. Findings included: Resident #46: Record review of a facility face sheet dated 8/8/23 for Resident #46 indicated that he was an [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including: dementia (the loss of cognitive functioning - thinking, remembering, and reasoning - to such an extent that it interferes with a person's daily life and activities), schizoaffective disorder bipolar type (episodes of mania and sometimes major depression), anxiety, and hypertension (high blood pressure). Record review of the Quarterly MDS for Resident #46 dated 5/29/23 indicated that he was rarely/never understood and had severe cognitive impairment. Question E0200 indicated that resident exhibited physical, verbal, and other behaviors 4-6 times a week to daily. Record review of the comprehensive care plan revised on 6/13/22 for Resident #46 indicated an intervention stating .when the resident becomes agitated, intervene before agitation escalates: guide away from the source of distress, engage calmly in conversation . Record review of a progress note dated 6/19/23 and signed by previous ADON for Resident #46 stated .there is a reported incident of a staff member recording the patient and posting him to social media, [name] Administrator, RP [name] notified, and [name] NP notified . During an observation on 08/07/23 at 09:11 AM Resident #46 observed lying in bed sleeping. Resident did not speak when spoken to. Resident #54: Record review of a facility face sheet dated 8/8/23 for Resident # 54 indicated that he was an [AGE] year-old male originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and subsequently readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including: Alzheimer's disease (a brain disorder that slowly destroys memory and thinking skills and, eventually, the ability to carry out the simplest tasks), dementia (the loss of cognitive functioning - thinking, remembering, and reasoning - to such an extent that it interferes with a person's daily life and activities), hypotension (low blood pressure), and personality change due to known physiological condition (may include being unable to think ahead or understand the consequences of their actions). Record review of the Quarterly MDS for Resident #54 dated 7/6/23 indicated a BIMS score of 6, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Question E0200 indicated that resident exhibited verbal and other behaviors 1-3 times a week to daily. Record review of comprehensive care plan initiated on 6/14/23 for Resident #54 indicated that he had poor impulse control related to dementia and would sometimes make sexually inappropriate comments to staff. Interventions included: .when the resident becomes agitated, intervene before agitation escalates; guide away from the source of distress, engage calmly in conversation . Record review of a progress note dated 6/19/23 and signed by previous ADON for Resident #54 stated .there is a reported incident of a staff member recording the patient and posting him to social media, [name] Administrator, RP [name] notified, and [name] NP notified . During an observation on 8/9/23 at approximately 6:00 pm, video of Resident #54 showed him standing in front of the camera making inappropriate sexual advances. A female voice could be heard laughing at him and asking him to repeat what he said. Interviews with facility staff above indicate that the female voice in the video was that of CNA A. Video of Resident #46 had been deleted and was no longer available for observation. During an interview with the DON on 8/9/23 at 8:15 am, she said that Resident #54 had been discharged home on 7/25/23. She said that he had been admitted to the unit for sexual inappropriateness and had inappropriate behaviors with females. She said that on 6/19/23, CNA A had worked the weekend before, that was her first weekend and she was going to be prn, not full time. She said that on Monday afternoon (6/19/23) about 4 pm, CNA G on the female side was made aware of a video and showed a paused image to her. It was in the dining room of the men's unit and there was 1 resident in the still image. The DON asked the aide where she got the video and CNA G replied that someone had seen it on [social media app] and sent it to her on [social media app]. She said that in the video you could hear CNA A's voice off camera, and Resident #54 was talking to the aide, standing in front of her. CNA A kept asking him what he said, and he said, do you want to fuck, he repeated it twice and she laughed about it. The DON said that they called the family and notified them immediately, and they also immediately called CNA A. She said that CNA A was told she was suspended pending investigation and she never came back. She was told that it was against policy, and she said that she didn't realize it was a big deal. She said that the facility has a direct policy regarding social media. The DON said that immediately after the incident, an in-service training was conducted with a 3-question test on what was considered questionable for private health information. She said that they reported the video to the police, and they came out immediately. From that incident prompted agency to no longer be staffed in the unit by themselves, especially overnight and she added an extra aide to the night shift as a float. She said it took about 2 days for the video to be taken down. A phone call was attempted on 8/9/23 at 8:55 am with CNA G, but there was no answer and surveyor was unable to leave a voicemail. During an interview with the previous ADON on 8/9/23 at 9:16 am, she said that the day she was notified about the video on 6/19/23, she was sitting in her office and CNA G told her to look at what was sent to her in a video. She said there was a video of Resident #54 and CNA A was sitting with the camera facing him and enticing him to say what he wanted to do with her, and he was asking her if he could have sex with her and she kept asking him to say it again and would laugh about it. She said the camera was in his face and he was the only resident in the video. She said that she called CNA A and informed her that she broke HIPPA and told her to take the video down. She had posted the video to [social media app]. The Previous ADON said that the aide did not think she had done anything wrong. She said the police were contacted and the officer was sent a copy of the video. She said that the aide was informed that she was suspended pending investigation for 3 days. During an interview with CNA A on 8/9/23 at 9:25 am, she said that she had only worked at the facility for one week. She said that she had posted 2 videos, one of Resident #46 kicking the door and the other of Resident #54. She said the video included Resident #54 talking to her. She said that he was just saying crazy stuff. She said that she was never specifically trained regarding posting on social media. She said that she did not talk to the police regarding incident. Said that she immediately deleted the videos after the facility asked her to on 6/19/23. She said that she only posted it because she thought that it was funny. She said that she did not think that it was a HIPAA violation. She said that she understands now that it was not funny, and she would probably be upset if this had happened to one of her family members. During an interview with family member of Resident #46 on 8/9/23 at 9:50 am, she said that the facility had called her around 6/19/23 and told her that a video had been posted. She said that she has not seen the video but was told that Resident #46's face was covered up. She said that she did not talk to the police. She said that when she heard about the video, it made her sad to think that her family member had been treated that way. She said that it was wrong to make fun of people when they can't help it. She said that she was not upset with the facility in any way because she said that they could not control an employee's actions. She doesn't think that he would be able to understand if he was told about the video because he doesn't understand things day to day anyway. She said that she has not noticed any behavior changes in him since the incident. During an interview with the family member of Resident #56 on 8/9/23 at 10:15 am, she said that she had not seen the video. She said that [another family member]had seen it. She said that she does not think the incident has affected his behavior at all, as he does not understand due to his dementia. She said that she was extremely upset about the video, and about it being posted on social media. She said that it upsets her to think that the aide was making fun of her family member and posted it for everyone to see. She said that the facility told her the employee was terminated and reported to State. During an interview with family member B of Resident #56 on 8/9/23 at 3:30 pm, she said that the facility had called and told her about the incident around 6/19/23, and she was very upset. She was crying while on the phone with the surveyor. She said that her family member was no longer himself since the dementia and Alzheimer's had gotten so bad. She was very upset that the aide was treating her family member like that and posting it on the internet. She said that he cannot help his behavior due to the dementia and did not deserve to be treated like that. During an interview on 8/10/23 at 10:00 am, the DON said that in the videos, Resident #46's face was covered with a smiley face emoji, but anyone that worked here would know who it was. She said that she expected it to not happen again. From now on, new hires were not allowed to work until after a personal interview by her. She said that they have now changed recruiting companies and no longer allow prn staff to work in the unit, and also have 2 aides at all times. During an interview on 8/10/23 at 9:25 am CNA J said he had been working at the facility for about a week and a half. He said that he had been trained on abuse, neglect, exploitation. He said that he had never witnessed any in the facility but if he did, he would immediately take steps to protect the resident and then immediately report to the Administrator/DON. He said that he had been trained on the social media policy and to not be on his cell phone while working or to video residents. During an interview on 8/10/23 at 9:45 am CNA K said that she had been employed by the facility for about 10 years. She said that she had been trained on abuse, neglect, and exploitation. She said that there were in-services the day of the incident with the video on the men's unit. She said that she had never witnessed any abuse, neglect, or exploitation, but would immediately intervene to protect the resident and then report to administrator/DON if she did. She said that she had been trained on social media and cell phone policy. She said that they are not allowed to be on their cell phones while working, and they are also not allowed to video residents without consent. During multiple observations on multiple occasions during onsite 8/7/23-8/10/23, no staff members were observed taking photos or videos of residents, and no staff were observed on their phones while working. Record review of a personnel file for CNA A indicated that her hire date was 6/1/23. Criminal history check indicated that it had been performed on 5/24/23. Employee misconduct registry check indicated a date of 5/24/23. No unemployable actions on either were indicated. Record review of a witness statement dated 6/19/23 signed by CNA F stated .On June 19th around 4:15 pm I saw a [name of social media app] of one of our residents online and immediately reported it to my ADON [name]. She had me send her the video and write a statement . Record review of a witness statement dated 6/19/23 signed by CNA G stated .On June 19th around 4:15 pm I acknowledged a [name of social media app] that was sent to my phone after another employee seen the same video on her 'fyp' on the [name of social media app]. I immediately recognized the unit the video was taken on and reported it to my DON and ADON [names] in the office . Record review of a police statement, undated, signed by DON stated .on 6/19/23 I was made aware of a video that had been posted on [social media name] that had one of our residents in it. The video was inappropriate in nature because this resident had dementia and inappropriate behaviors due to his disease process. This video showed his face and violated his rights to privacy, and his family did not consent to social media posts. We immediately reported the event and suspended that employee. The employee who posted it was [name] (CNA A). Her [social media app] name is[screen name]. [Name] CNA G found the video when it was sent to her and reported it to me . Record review of a police statement, undated signed by CNA G indicated .On June 19th around 4 pm I seen a [social media app] online consisting of footage containing one of our residents. I immediately reported this to my supervisors . Record review of QAPI notes dated 6/20/23 indicated that the meeting was attended by the following members: Administrator, DON, ADON, MDS nurse, Activity Director, Dietary Manager, Maintenance Supervisor, Social Worker, Rehab Director, and Medical Director. The interventions and plan for correction included: 1. Inservice over abuse and neglect policy and procedure. In-services dated 6/19/23 included the following topics: Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, and Misappropriation, Recognizing Signs and Symptoms of Abuse/Neglect, Protection of Residents During Abuse Investigations, Abuse/Neglect Clinical Protocol, and Use of Electronic Communications and Social Media 2. Inservice over social media policy with 3 question posttest. In-service dated 6/19/23 and post test completed by all current staff between the dates of 6/19/23 and 6/26/23. Staff were required to complete this before being allowed to return to work if they had been off. 3. New hires will be required to complete additional Relias course including policies and HIPAA guidelines before first day of orientation. 4. Cell phone policy re-instated and enforced. All current staff re-educated and new hires must complete training before allowed to work. Record review of sign in sheets for all in-services dated 6/19/23 indicated that 59 staff members had signed the sign in sheet for the in-services on Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, and Misappropriation, Recognizing Signs and Symptoms of Abuse/Neglect, Protection of Residents During Abuse Investigations, Abuse/Neglect Clinical Protocol, and Use of Electronic Communications and Social Media Record review of an Associate Separation Report dated 6/19/23 for CNA A indicated that she was terminated on 6/19/23 for violating social media policy, failure to protect resident rights, as well as violation of cell phone policy. Record review of an in-service dated 6/19/23 covering Social Media indicated .residents have rights, and they have the right to privacy. Under no circumstance is it acceptable to video them or record them. Especially, the residents on our secure units are there because they no longer can care for themselves, and it is not a matter to take lightly or record and share for your entertainment. It is disgusting and shameful to record them while they do not know what they are saying or doing. This is an immediate termination, and possibly revoking of your license . Three question posttest indicated .1. Resident pictures and videos are considered health care records. True or False; 2. Taking pictures or videos of residents and posting them to any social media outlet or sharing them with friends is a violation of resident's rights. True or False; and 3. If you suspect a staff member has or is taking pictures or videos of a resident, you need to report this to the Abuse Coordinator immediately. True or False . Sign in sheet indicated that all current staff have completed questionnaire. Record review of the facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program dated 2001 with revision date of April 2021 indicated .Establish and maintain a culture of compassion and caring for all residents and particularly those with behavioral, cognitive or emotional problems . Record review of facility policy titled Videotaping, Photographing, and Other Imaging of Residents dated 2001 with revision date of April 2017 indicated that .Residents will be protected from invasion of privacy and/or abuse that might occur from photographs, videotapes, digital images, and recordings during resident care or other facility activities . and .transmitting unauthorized images of any resident through email, internet or social media is considered a violation of resident rights. Any image or recording taken that may be construed as humiliating or demeaning to a resident or residents is considered abuse and will be reported and investigated as such . Record review of facility policy titled Abuse and Neglect - Clinical Protocol dated 2005 with revision date of March 2018 indicated .Abuse is defined .as the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish .it includes verbal abuse, sexual abuse, physical abuse, and mental abuse including abuse facilitated or enabled through the use of technology . On 8/9/23 at 2:48 pm Administrator, DON and Corporate staff were informed of IJ. The non-compliance was identified as past non-compliance. The IJ began on 6/19/23 and ended on 6/19/23. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before survey began.
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents the right to be free from abuse for 2 ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents the right to be free from abuse for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident # 46 and Resident #54) in that: On 6/19/23 CNA A took a video of Residents # 46 on the secured unit of facility and posted the video on social media of him kicking the door. On 6/19/23 CNA A took a video of Resident # 54 on the secured unit of facility making inappropriate sexual advances and posted the video on social media. The non-compliance was identified as past non-compliance. The IJ began on 6/19/23 and ended on 6/19/23. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before survey began. This failure could place residents at risk of abuse, humiliation, intimidation, fear, shame, agitation, and decreased quality of life. Findings included: Resident #46: Record review of a facility face sheet dated 8/8/23 for Resident #46 indicated that he was an [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including: dementia (the loss of cognitive functioning - thinking, remembering, and reasoning - to such an extent that it interferes with a person's daily life and activities), schizoaffective disorder bipolar type (episodes of mania and sometimes major depression), anxiety, and hypertension (high blood pressure). Record review of the Quarterly MDS for Resident #46 dated 5/29/23 indicated that he was rarely/never understood and had severe cognitive impairment. Question E0200 indicated that resident exhibited physical, verbal, and other behaviors 4-6 times a week to daily. Record review of the comprehensive care plan revised on 6/13/22 for Resident #46 indicated an intervention stating .when the resident becomes agitated, intervene before agitation escalates: guide away from the source of distress, engage calmly in conversation . Record review of a progress note dated 6/19/23 and signed by previous ADON for Resident #46 stated .there is a reported incident of a staff member recording the patient and posting him to social media, [name] Administrator, RP [name] notified, and [name] NP notified . During an observation on 08/07/23 at 09:11 AM Resident #46 observed lying in bed sleeping. Resident did not speak when spoken to. Resident #54: Record review of a facility face sheet dated 8/8/23 for Resident # 54 indicated that he was an [AGE] year-old male originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and subsequently readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including: Alzheimer's disease (a brain disorder that slowly destroys memory and thinking skills and, eventually, the ability to carry out the simplest tasks), dementia (the loss of cognitive functioning - thinking, remembering, and reasoning - to such an extent that it interferes with a person's daily life and activities), hypotension (low blood pressure), and personality change due to known physiological condition (may include being unable to think ahead or understand the consequences of their actions). Record review of the Quarterly MDS for Resident #54 dated 7/6/23 indicated a BIMS score of 6, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Question E0200 indicated that resident exhibited verbal and other behaviors 1-3 times a week to daily. Record review of comprehensive care plan initiated on 6/14/23 for Resident #54 indicated that he had poor impulse control related to dementia and would sometimes make sexually inappropriate comments to staff. Interventions included: .when the resident becomes agitated, intervene before agitation escalates; guide away from the source of distress, engage calmly in conversation . Record review of a progress note dated 6/19/23 and signed by previous ADON for Resident #54 stated .there is a reported incident of a staff member recording the patient and posting him to social media, [name] Administrator, RP [name] notified, and [name] NP notified . During an observation on 8/9/23 at approximately 6:00 pm, video of Resident #54 showed him standing in front of the camera making inappropriate sexual advances. A female voice could be heard laughing at him and asking him to repeat what he said. Interviews with facility staff above indicate that the female voice in the video was that of CNA A. Video of Resident #46 had been deleted and was no longer available for observation. During an interview with the DON on 8/9/23 at 8:15 am, she said that Resident #54 had been discharged home on 7/25/23. She said that he had been admitted to the unit for sexual inappropriateness and had inappropriate behaviors with females. She said that on 6/19/23, CNA A had worked the weekend before, that was her first weekend and she was going to be prn, not full time. She said that on Monday afternoon (6/19/23) about 4 pm, CNA G on the female side was made aware of a video and showed a paused image to her. It was in the dining room of the men's unit and there was 1 resident in the still image. The DON asked the aide where she got the video and CNA G replied that someone had seen it on [social media app] and sent it to her on [social media app]. She said that in the video you could hear CNA A's voice off camera, and Resident #54 was talking to the aide, standing in front of her. CNA A kept asking him what he said, and he said, do you want to fuck, he repeated it twice and she laughed about it. The DON said that they called the family and notified them immediately, and they also immediately called CNA A. She said that CNA A was told she was suspended pending investigation and she never came back. She was told that it was against policy and considered resident abuse, and CNA A said that she didn't realize it was a big deal. She said that the facility has a direct policy regarding social media. The DON said that immediately after the incident, an in-service training was conducted with a 3-question test on what was considered questionable for private health information. She said that they reported the video to the police, and they came out immediately. From that incident prompted agency to no longer be staffed in the unit by themselves, especially overnight and she added an extra aide to the night shift as a float. She said it took about 2 days for the video to be taken down. A phone call was attempted on 8/9/23 at 8:55 am with CNA G, but there was no answer and surveyor was unable to leave a voicemail. During an interview with the previous ADON on 8/9/23 at 9:16 am, she said that the day she was notified about the video on 6/19/23, she was sitting in her office and CNA G told her to look at what was sent to her in a video. She said there was a video of Resident #54 and CNA A was sitting with the camera facing him and enticing him to say what he wanted to do with her, and he was asking her if he could have sex with her and she kept asking him to say it again and would laugh about it. She said the camera was in his face and he was the only resident in the video. She said that she called CNA A and informed her that she broke HIPPA and told her to take the video down. She had posted the video to [social media app]. The Previous ADON said that the aide did not think she had done anything wrong. She said the police were contacted and the officer was sent a copy of the video. She said that the aide was informed that she was suspended pending investigation for 3 days. During an interview with CNA A on 8/9/23 at 9:25 am, she said that she had only worked at the facility for one week. She said that she had posted 2 videos, one of Resident #46 kicking the door and the other of Resident #54. She said the video included Resident #54 talking to her. She said that he was just saying crazy stuff. She said that she was never specifically trained regarding posting on social media. She said that she did not talk to the police regarding incident. Said that she immediately deleted the videos after the facility asked her to on 6/19/23. She said that she only posted it because she thought that it was funny. She said that she did not think that it was a HIPAA violation or resident abuse. She said that she understands now that it was not funny, and she would probably be upset if this had happened to one of her family members. During an interview with family member of Resident #46 on 8/9/23 at 9:50 am, she said that the facility had called her around 6/19/23 and told her that a video had been posted. She said that she has not seen the video but was told that Resident #46's face was covered up. She said that she did not talk to the police. She said that when she heard about the video, it made her sad to think that her family member had been treated that way. She said that it was wrong to make fun of people when they can't help it. She said that she was not upset with the facility in any way because she said that they could not control an employee's actions. She doesn't think that he would be able to understand if he was told about the video because he doesn't understand things day to day anyway. She said that she has not noticed any behavior changes in him since the incident. During an interview with the family member of Resident #56 on 8/9/23 at 10:15 am, she said that she had not seen the video. She said that [another family member]had seen it. She said that she does not think the incident has affected his behavior at all, as he does not understand due to his dementia. She said that she was extremely upset about the video, and about it being posted on social media. She said that it upsets her to think that the aide was making fun of her family member and posted it for everyone to see. She said that the facility told her the employee was terminated and reported to State. During an interview with family member B of Resident #56 on 8/9/23 at 3:30 pm, she said that the facility had called and told her about the incident around 6/19/23, and she was very upset. She was crying while on the phone with the surveyor. She said that her family member was no longer himself since the dementia and Alzheimer's had gotten so bad. She was very upset that the aide was treating her family member like that and posting it on the internet. She said that he cannot help his behavior due to the dementia and did not deserve to be treated like that. During an interview on 8/10/23 at 10:00 am, the DON said that in the videos, Resident #46's face was covered with a smiley face emoji, but anyone that worked here would know who it was. She said that she expected it to not happen again. From now on, new hires were not allowed to work until after a personal interview by her. She said that they have now changed recruiting companies and no longer allow prn staff to work in the unit, and also have 2 aides at all times. During an interview on 8/10/23 at 9:25 am CNA J said he had been working at the facility for about a week and a half. He said he was not agency staff, but regular facility staff. He said that he had been trained on abuse, neglect, exploitation. He said that he had never witnessed any in the facility but if he did, he would immediately take steps to protect the resident and then immediately report to the Administrator/DON. He said that he had been trained on the social media policy and to not be on his cell phone while working or to video residents. He said that he was required to complete the trainings on abuse, neglect, exploitation and social media and cell phone policies before he was allowed to begin working. During an interview on 8/10/23 at 9:45 am CNA K said that she had been employed by the facility for about 10 years and was not agency staff. She said that she had been trained on abuse, neglect, and exploitation. She said that there were in-services the day of the incident with the video on the men's unit. She said that she had never witnessed any abuse, neglect, or exploitation, but would immediately intervene to protect the resident and then report to administrator/DON if she did. She said that she had been trained on social media and cell phone policy. She said that they are not allowed to be on their cell phones while working, and they are also not allowed to video residents without consent. During multiple observations on multiple occasions during onsite 8/7/23-8/10/23, no staff members were observed taking photos or videos of residents, and no staff were observed on their phones while working. Record review of a personnel file for CNA A indicated that her hire date was 6/1/23. Criminal history check indicated that it had been performed on 5/24/23. Employee misconduct registry check indicated a date of 5/24/23. No unemployable actions on either were indicated. Record review of a witness statement dated 6/19/23 signed by CNA F stated .On June 19th around 4:15 pm I saw a [name of social media app] of one of our residents online and immediately reported it to my ADON [name]. She had me send her the video and write a statement . Record review of a witness statement dated 6/19/23 signed by CNA G stated .On June 19th around 4:15 pm I acknowledged a [name of social media app] that was sent to my phone after another employee seen the same video on her 'fyp' on the [name of social media app]. I immediately recognized the unit the video was taken on and reported it to my DON and ADON [names] in the office . Record review of a police statement, undated, signed by DON stated .on 6/19/23 I was made aware of a video that had been posted on [social media name] that had one of our residents in it. The video was inappropriate in nature because this resident had dementia and inappropriate behaviors due to his disease process. This video showed his face and violated his rights to privacy, and his family did not consent to social media posts. We immediately reported the event and suspended that employee. The employee who posted it was [name] (CNA A). Her [social media app] name is[screen name]. [Name] CNA G found the video when it was sent to her and reported it to me . Record review of a police statement, undated signed by CNA G indicated .On June 19th around 4 pm I seen a [social media app] online consisting of footage containing one of our residents. I immediately reported this to my supervisors . Record review of QAPI notes dated 6/20/23 indicated that the meeting was attended by the following members: Administrator, DON, ADON, MDS nurse, Activity Director, Dietary Manager, Maintenance Supervisor, Social Worker, Rehab Director, and Medical Director. The interventions and plan for correction included: 1. Inservice over abuse and neglect policy and procedure. In-services dated 6/19/23 included the following topics: Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, and Misappropriation, Recognizing Signs and Symptoms of Abuse/Neglect, Protection of Residents During Abuse Investigations, Abuse/Neglect Clinical Protocol, and Use of Electronic Communications and Social Media 2. Inservice over social media policy with 3 question posttest. In-service dated 6/19/23 and post test completed by all current staff between the dates of 6/19/23 and 6/26/23. Staff were required to complete this before being allowed to return to work if they had been off. 3. New hires will be required to complete additional Relias course including policies and HIPAA guidelines before first day of orientation. 4. Cell phone policy re-instated and enforced. All current staff re-educated and new hires must complete training before allowed to work. Record review of sign in sheets for all in-services dated 6/19/23 indicated that 59 staff members had signed the sign in sheet for the in-services on Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, and Misappropriation, Recognizing Signs and Symptoms of Abuse/Neglect, Protection of Residents During Abuse Investigations, Abuse/Neglect Clinical Protocol, and Use of Electronic Communications and Social Media Record review of an Associate Separation Report dated 6/19/23 for CNA A indicated that she was terminated on 6/19/23 for violating social media policy, failure to protect resident rights, as well as violation of cell phone policy. Record review of an in-service dated 6/19/23 covering Social Media indicated .residents have rights, and they have the right to privacy. Under no circumstance is it acceptable to video them or record them. Especially, the residents on our secure units are there because they no longer can care for themselves, and it is not a matter to take lightly or record and share for your entertainment. It is disgusting and shameful to record them while they do not know what they are saying or doing. This is an immediate termination, and possibly revoking of your license . Three question posttest indicated .1. Resident pictures and videos are considered health care records. True or False; 2. Taking pictures or videos of residents and posting them to any social media outlet or sharing them with friends is a violation of resident's rights. True or False; and 3. If you suspect a staff member has or is taking pictures or videos of a resident, you need to report this to the Abuse Coordinator immediately. True or False . Sign in sheet indicated that all current staff have completed questionnaire. Record review of the facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program dated 2001 with revision date of April 2021 indicated .Establish and maintain a culture of compassion and caring for all residents and particularly those with behavioral, cognitive or emotional problems . Record review of facility policy titled Videotaping, Photographing, and Other Imaging of Residents dated 2001 with revision date of April 2017 indicated that .Residents will be protected from invasion of privacy and/or abuse that might occur from photographs, videotapes, digital images, and recordings during resident care or other facility activities . and .transmitting unauthorized images of any resident through email, internet or social media is considered a violation of resident rights. Any image or recording taken that may be construed as humiliating or demeaning to a resident or residents is considered abuse and will be reported and investigated as such . Record review of facility policy titled Abuse and Neglect - Clinical Protocol dated 2005 with revision date of March 2018 indicated .Abuse is defined .as the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish .it includes verbal abuse, sexual abuse, physical abuse, and mental abuse including abuse facilitated or enabled through the use of technology . On 8/9/23 at 2:48 pm Administrator, DON and Corporate staff were informed of IJ. The non-compliance was identified as past non-compliance. The IJ began on 6/19/23 and ended on 6/19/23. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before survey began.
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and assistance to prevent...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and assistance to prevent accidents for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for accidents/supervision (Resident #28) in that: Facility failed to ensure a resident environment as free of accidents/hazards as possible due to not ensuring the locks were engaged on the secure unit and not ensuring that the alarm was functioning on the emergency door on secure unit. Resident #28 eloped from the facility on 6/23/23 and was discovered by a local citizen approximately 2 blocks from the facility. The non-compliance was identified as past non-compliance. The IJ began on 6/23/23 and ended on 6/23/23. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before survey began. This failure could place all residents at risk of eloping which could lead to severe injuries or death. Findings included: During an observation on 8/10/23 at 9:35 am on female secure unit, 2 aides were present. Resident #28 observed wandering aimlessly, ambulating independently, resident did not speak, would only make facial expressions and occasionally grunt. Record review of a facility face sheet dated 8/8/23 for Resident #28 indicated that she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including: Alzheimer's disease, repeated falls, and history of traumatic brain injury. Record review of a quarterly MDS dated [DATE] for Resident #28 indicated that resident was unable to complete interview for BIMS score and had severely impaired cognitive status. Question E0900 indicated that resident exhibited wandering behavior 4-6 times per week. Record review of comprehensive care plan for Resident #28 dated 12/20/22 indicated that she was an elopement risk/wanderer as evidenced by impaired safety awareness, resident wanders aimlessly. Interventions included .distract resident from wandering by offering pleasant diversions, structured activities, food, conversation, television, book . Record review of an elopement nurses note for Resident #28 dated 6/23/23 at 5:45 pm and signed by DON, indicated that resident was missing for 18 minutes. Record review of a behavior nurses note for Resident #28 dated 6/23/23 at 8:22 pm and signed by LVN H indicated that resident eloped from building in rain and was walking on 2nd street towards the highway. Record review of a progress noted for Resident #28 dated 6/23/23 at 8:12 pm indicated .CMA notified nurse of receiving a phone call from a lady stating y'all have a resident with a pink helmet on over on second street walking I then proceeded to exit building in attempt to locate resident which I did, and she was walking on second street with a male that lived near the nursing home. Upon reaching resident redirected her into care and back to the nursing home. Head to toe assessment done, no injuries noted, removed damp clothes from the rain and placed dry clean clothes onto her . signed LVN H. During an interview on 8/7/23 at 9:37 am, CNA D said that she was not here when Resident #28 eloped. She said that Resident #28 does not speak, she will only grunt at times. During an observation and interview on 8/7/23 at 10:20 am, Administrator said that on the day Resident #28 eloped, the facility received a phone call from a lady saying that there was a resident with a pink helmet on walking down 2nd street toward the highway. Staff immediately went and got her and brought her back. She said that the emergency switch (this was a light switch on the wall that turned the locks on the doors off and on) had somehow gotten flipped off, so the doors were unlocked. Administrator demonstrated that there was a clear plastic cover over the switch now that was locked and could no longer be accidentally or purposefully switched off unless it was unlocked with a key. Administrator said that she has the key. She said they do not know how long it had been off or who turned it off, but the emergency switch controls the locks on the unit doors and the end door. The alarm on the end door did not go off. The resident got out of the end door and out of the gate (which did not have a lock on it at that time). Resident walked down the sidewalk with several steps and got to the roadway near the front of the facility. Administrator said that the alarm did not go off when end door was opened. Administrator said that after the incident, a cover was placed over the emergency switch, which cannot be opened without a key. All staff were in serviced on elopements, a new door alarm was placed on end door and outside gate [NAME] lock placed on it. During an interview on 8/7/23 at 3:20 pm, LVN H said that she was on the men's unit doing finger sticks on 6/23/23 when someone yelled we need you. She said she immediately went to help. She said that a first responder picked her up and they went toward the resident in the vehicle. She said that she got the resident in the car, and they brought her back to the facility and changed her out of her wet clothes, did a head-to-toe assessment and notified everyone of the incident. She does not remember which aides were working that day. She said that the resident was able to get out of the door because the emergency switch had been flipped off. She said that everyone was in-serviced on elopements immediately after the incident and they monitored the alarm switches hourly to ensure they were not turned off again. During an interview on 8/7/23 at 3:00 pm, LVN E said that he has been working here since October of this year. He was working on 6/23/23 and said that someone had turned the switch off to the release switch which powers the doors. He said Resident #28 was able to get out and walked to the intersection. He said he was the one who answered the phone when the lady told him there was a resident walking down the road, he immediately went out to get Resident #28. He said she had made it to the intersection of 2nd street and [NAME] Street, which was 2 blocks from exit point of facility. He said that they got her back in and they had to change her out of her wet clothes because it was raining, and she had gotten wet. He said that they did a head-to-toe assessment to make sure she didn't have any injuries. He said she was not injured. He said the lady that called apparently lives in one of the houses across the street and that a male first responder was following closely behind the resident to help ensure that she did not get into the road. He said that in-services were done the day the incident occurred on elopements and emergency procedures. He said they also did a head count of all residents in the facility and alarms were monitored hourly until all new systems were put into place. During an interview on 8/10/23 at 10:00 am, the DON said after the elopement, they secured both units doors immediately by turning the switch back on and placing a temporary cover over the switch until a new permanent one could be delivered and installed. She said there was also a striker alarm placed on the end emergency door until a new alarm could be delivered and installed. DON said that they no longer allow staff members to go out the emergency end doors. She said that they always do a head count when the door alarms go off. She said that elopements put residents at risk of falls and injury because they are close to a highway and also at risk of heat exposure. She said that she expected her staff to not allow it to happen again. Record review of a QAPI Committee Report dated 6/23/23 indicated that there was a meeting held on 6/23/23 at 6:00 pm consisting of Administrator, DON, ADON, Dietary Supervisor, Activity Director, MDS nurse, Maintenance Supervisor, Social Worker, Rehabilitation Director, and Medical Director. The following interventions were put in place: In-services: Elopements, Emergency Procedure - Missing Resident, Reporting Maintenance Tasks. Door Alarms - Monitor door alarms every shift, and monitor that cover is over the door alarm and is intact Maintenance will be notified of any non-working equipment. Alarm and door check will be checked off by nursing staff every shift. Record review of sign in sheet for in-service on Emergency Procedure - Missing Resident, dated 6/23/23, indicated that 59 staff members signed the in-service. Record review of sign in sheet for in-service on Elopements, dated 6/23/23, indicated that 59 staff members signed the in-service. Record review of in-service dated 6/23/23 for Maintenance indicated that the following education was provided to staff: .all maintenance tasks must be reported to the maintenance supervisor. This can be reported in the maintenance log located at the nurse's station. When reporting maintenance tasks you must put the date, what the task is and where the maintenance task is located. The maintenance supervisor and/or designee will update the maintenance binder once a maintenance task has been completed. If you find any maintenance tasks that need immediate attention, then you must report to the Administrator immediately. Examples of tasks that need to be reported immediately: Alarms not working, doors not locking, broken equipment, etc .If you are ever in doubt, report it . Record review of a Secure Unit Door and Alarm Check form dated 6/23/23 -6/28/23 indicated that door alarms and unit doors were monitored hourly by nursing staff beginning immediately after incident on 6/23/23 until new door alarms were placed on 6/26/23 and for 48 hours after new alarm placed. Record review of Elopement Risk assessments dated 6/19/23 indicate that assessments were done on all residents in facility on 6/19/23. Record review of Inservice for Maintenance Supervisor (who is no longer employed) dated 6/26/23 to test door alarms and ensure they are working properly. Return demonstration done and signed by Administrator and Maintenance Supervisor. Record review of alarm monitoring form indicated that new alarm for emergency end door arrived and was placed on 6/26/23 and that permanent cover was installed on 7/3/23. Daily monitoring for functioning was documented daily until 8/4/23. Record review of Work History Report dated 8/7/23 indicated that outside gate had lock placed and was checked for proper functioning on 6/30/23. Record review of a facility policy titled Emergency Procedure - Missing Resident dated 2001 with revision date of August 2018 indicated .Residents at risk for wandering and/or elopement will be monitored, and staff will take necessary precautions to ensure their safety . On 8/8/23 at 10:25 am Administrator, DON and Corporate staff were informed of IJ. The non-compliance was identified as past non-compliance. The IJ began on 6/23/23 and ended on 6/23/23. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before survey began.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Assessment Accuracy (Tag F0641)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure an accurate MDS was completed for 2 of 24 residents reviewed ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure an accurate MDS was completed for 2 of 24 residents reviewed for MDS assessment accuracy. (Resident #38 and Resident #43) The facility incorrectly coded Resident #38 as being on dialysis and not on hospice services. The facility incorrectly coded Resident #43's antiplatelet as an anticoagulant on her MDS. These failures could place residents at risk for not receiving the appropriate care and services to maintain the highest level of well-being. Findings included: 1.Record review of an admission Record for Resident #38 dated 8/9/2023 indicated she admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was [AGE] years old with diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (a progressive disease that destroys memory), major depressive disorder (persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), and hypothyroidism (condition in which the thyroid gland does not produce enough thyroid hormone) Record review of Resident #38's physician orders dated 8/9/2023 indicated she did not have an order for dialysis but did have an order for hospice services with an admit date of 4/12/2023. Record review of a Significant Change MDS assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #38 indicated she was rarely/never understood. Special treatments indicated while a resident she was on dialysis but not hospice. 2. Record review of an admission Record dated 8/9/2023 for Resident #43 indicated she admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was [AGE] years old with diagnoses of urinary tract infection (bacteria in the urinary system that causes an infection), enterocolitis due to clostridium difficile (a disturbance of the normal bacterial flora in the colon, colonized by the bacteria that causes diarrhea) psychotic disorder with delusion (belief in something that is not true), dementia and agoraphobic with panic disorder (avoiding situations or places that may cause fear or embarrassment, not being able to escape or get help if a panic attack occurs). Record review of Resident #43's orders dated 8/9/2023 indicated she had an order for clopidogrel 75 mg daily that started on 9/10/22. Record review of a Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] and indicated Resident #43 was on an anticoagulant for 7 days during the look back period. Record review of a care plan undated for Resident #43 indicated a focus that she had a coronary artery disease related to occlusion (blockage) and stenosis (narrowing) bilateral (both) carotid arteries with medication clopidogrel listed. Record review of a Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #43 indicated she was rarely/never understood. She received 7 days of an anticoagulant during the 7 day look back period. During an interview on 8/10/2023 at 7:50 AM, the MDS Coordinator said she had been employed at the facility for 3 years and had been the MDS coordinator since February 2022. She said she was responsible for completing the MDS assessments on the residents in the facility and ensuring the information was entered correctly and her regional MDS Coordinator was responsible for monitoring for MDS accuracy. She said she did not think about clopidogrel not being an anticoagulant. She said when she looked up the medication it was classified as an antiplatelet. She said clopidogrel was not an anticoagulant and was coded incorrectly. She said Resident #38 was not on dialysis but was on hospice. She said she must have been in a hurry and clicked the wrong button when she completed the MDS assessment for Resident #38. She said she would do modifications to the MDS assessments to correct them. During an interview on 8/10/2023 at 9:55 AM, the Regional MDS Coordinator said she MDS coordinator at the facility had received training on completing MDS assessments. She said the MDS coordinator could refer to the RAI manual for clarification and could also look up the drug classifications of medications if she was unsure. She said the MDS coordinator did contact her about the discrepancy of the assessment with coding clopidogrel as an anticoagulant and completed a modification to the assessment. During an interview on 8/10/2023 at 10:05 AM, the Administrator said the MDS Assessments were to be completed accurately as they populated in the system. She said a resident could be at risk for not having accurate information reflected. Record review of a facility policy titled Certifying Accuracy of the Resident Assessment with a revised date of November 2019, .Any person completing a portion of the Minimum Data Set/MDS (Resident Assessment Instrument) must sign and certify the accuracy of that portion of the assessment. 3. The information captured on the assessment reflects the status of the resident during the observation (look-back) period for that assessment. Different items on the MDS may have different observation periods .
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

PASARR Coordination (Tag F0644)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to refer all residents with newly evident or possible serious mental di...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to refer all residents with newly evident or possible serious mental disorder, intellectual disability, or a related condition for level II resident review upon a significant change of condition for 1 of 5 Residents (Resident #43) reviewed for PASSAR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review Services) in that: Resident #43 did not have a PASSR level II evaluation with diagnosis of agoraphobia (avoiding situations or places that may cause fear or embarrassment, not being able to escape or get help if a panic attack occurs). The MDS Coordinator failed to refer Resident #43 for a resident review after being diagnosed with agoraphobia with onset of diagnoses on 12/30/2022 and psychotic disorder with delusions on 2/2/2023. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving the needed PASSAR services to meet their individual needs and could result in a decrease quality of life. The findings were: Record review of an admission Record dated 8/9/2023 for Resident #43 indicated she admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was [AGE] years old with diagnoses of urinary tract infection (bacteria in the urinary system that causes an infection), enterocolitis due to clostridium difficile (a disturbance of the normal bacterial flora in the colon, colonized by the bacteria that causes diarrhea) psychotic disorder with delusion (belief in something that is not true), dementia and agoraphobic with panic disorder (avoiding situations or places that may cause fear or embarrassment, not being able to escape or get help if a panic attack occurs). Record review of a Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #43 indicated she was rarely/never understood, and a referral was not made to the local contact agency. She had a psychiatric mood disorder with diagnoses of psychotic disorder and agoraphobia with panic disorder. Record review of a care plan undated for Resident #43 indicated a focus that she has a mood problem related to depression. Record review of a PL1 (PASSR Level 1 Screening) for Resident #43 was completed on 9/9/2022 following an admit from home and indicated she was negative for mental illness (MI). During an interview on 8/10/2023 at 7:50 AM, the MDS Coordinator said she had been employed at the facility for 3 years. She said Resident #43 admitted to the facility with a negative PL1 and she was responsible for coordinating with PASSR. She said Resident #43 diagnosis was entered by someone else and she was not aware that she had new mental illness diagnoses. She said if a resident admitted to the facility with a negative PL1 and later had a new diagnosis of mental illness, she would contact the local authority to let them know to see if a new PL1 needed to be completed or a form 1012 (Mental Illness/Dementia Resident Review) by the physician. She said a resident could miss out on services that they qualified for. During an interview on 8/10/2023 at 9:55 AM, the Regional MDS Coordinator said she was not aware Resident #43 did not have a new PL1 submitted following new diagnoses of mental illness. She said when a resident had a new diagnosis of mental illness after a negative PL1, then and a new PL1 would need to be completed and contact the local authority. She said a risk to the residents could be not getting the needed services. During an interview on 8/10/2023 at 10:05 AM, the Administrator said any resident with a new diagnosis of mental illness should have a new PL1 completed and the MDS Coordinator was responsible. She said going forward she would educate the MDS Coordinator on all of the requirements on PASSR. She said a resident could be at risk of not receiving additional services. Record review of a facility policy titled PL1/PASSR/IDT/NFSS/1012/PCSP with a revised date of 1/16/2019 indicated, .The facility will ensure compliance with all Phase I and Phase II guidelines of the PASSR process for long term care. 1. f. If at any time a resident has a significant change, admits to hospice, discharge to another facility, or you receive information that might indicate the resident may have a MI/ID/DD diagnosis or condition not contained in the medical record, please submit a Pl1 form for the resident to be evaluation by the local authority.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles a...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles and the expiration date when applicable for 1 of 2 medication carts (medication aide cart on D hall) reviewed for labeling and storage. The facility failed to properly label eye drops for Resident # 9. This failure could place residents who receive medications at risk for receiving outdated medications and could result in residents not receiving the intended therapeutic effects of their medications and health decline. Findings included: During a medication administration observation on 08/08/23 at 08:45 am a sample box of Prolensa eye drops was present on the medication aide cart on D hall but did not have a label identifying the resident, date opened or medication directions. During an interview on 08/08/2023 at 08:55 am, MA A stated that she had been a medication aide since November 2022 and received her medication aide training at another facility and when hired at this facility someone overseen that she could give medications correctly. MA A stated the eye doctor gave Resident #9 the sample box of Prolensa last week after a visit and the box was placed on the cart and she should have put his name and date on the box and bottle. She stated she had training on proper medication labeling and if a medication was not properly labeled it could cause errors and a resident would not get the benefit of the medication. During an interview on 8/08/2023 at 12:41 pm, the DON stated she was responsible for oversight and training for all medication aides and for ensuring all medications are giving accurately and safely. She stated the nurse and MA were responsible for ensuring medications were labeled properly before administering to a resident. She stated sample medications should always be labeled with at least the resident name and date when received from the physician office until the pharmacy delivered the medication to the facility. She stated she expected all medications to be labeled properly to prevent errors. During an interview on 08/10/23 at 08:46 am, the administrator stated the DON was responsible for training of all nurses and MA's on proper medication administration including following doctors' orders, labeling, and infection control. She stated she expected all nurses and MA's to administer medications appropriately to prevent a drug reaction, infection, or medication error. Record review of facility policy titled labeling of medication containers dated April 2019 indicated, .all medications maintained in the facility are properly labeled in accordance with current state and federal guidelines and regulations .
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pharmacy Services (Tag F0755)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that assures the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of medications for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #9) reviewed for pharmacy services in that: MA A administered Resident #9's eye drops in the incorrect eye. This failure could place residents who receive medications at risk of not receiving the intended therapeutic benefit of the medications. Findings included: Record review of facility face sheet dated 8/08/2023 indicated Resident #9 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] for diagnosis of pancreatitis (infection of pancreas) and cerebral palsy (disorder that affects movement, muscle tone, balance, and posture). Record review of the quarterly MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident #9 had a BIMS score of 15 indicating intact cognition. Record review of the consolidated physicians order dated 7/31/2023 indicated Resident #9 had an order for Prolensa Ophthalmic Solution instill 1 drop in left eye two times a day. During a medication administration observation on 08/08/23 at 08:45 am, MA A administered Resident # 9's Prolensa eye drops 1 drop to his right eye. During an interview on 08/08/2023 at 08:55 am, MA A stated that she had been a medication aide since November 2022 and received her medication aide training at another facility and when hired at this facility someone overseen that she could give medications correctly. She stated that she knew how to give medications as ordered and Resident #9 was to get his drops in his left eye, but she got twisted and gave them in his right eye. She stated the risk of improper medication administration could be adverse reaction or medicine not working as it should. During an interview on 8/08/2023 at 12:41 pm, the DON stated she was responsible for oversight and training for all medication aides and for ensuring all medications were giving accurately and safely. She stated all medications should be given per the physician orders and expects the MA to follow each order correctly to avoid an adverse reaction. During an interview on 08/10/23 at 08:46 am, the administrator stated the DON was responsible for training all nurses and MA's on proper medication administration including following doctors' orders. She stated her expectation was for all nurses and MA's to administer medications appropriately to prevent a drug reaction, infection, or medication error. Record review of facility policy titled Pharmacy Services Overview dated April 2019 indicated, .the facility shall accurately and safely provide or obtain pharmaceutical services . Record review of facility policy titled Administering Meds dated April 2005 indicated, .8. the individual administering the medication must ensure that the right medication, right dosage, right time, and right method of administration are verified (review of drug label, physician's order, etc) before the medication is administered.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, and distributed und...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, and distributed under sanitary conditions in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation in that: The temperature gage on the dish machine was not working. The dish machine did not reach manufacturer's recommend water temperature of 120 degrees F during rinse cycle, required for a low temperature, chemical sanitation dish machine. The staff did not have the proper test strips (Chlorine Test Strip) to test the sanitation level of the dish machine. These failures could place the residents at risk of foodborne illnesses. Findings include: . During an observation and interview on 08/07/23 at 8:44 a.m., the [NAME] was standing at the dish machine getting ready to wash the breakfast dishes. The [NAME] ran the dish machine five times to get water temperature up to manufacturer's recommended 120 degrees F. The temperature gage on the machine never moved off 0 degrees F. Surveyor got her [NAME] thermometer and tested the water, and it reached 118 degrees F. Manufacturer's recommendation was for the water to reach a temperature between 120-140 degrees F during the rinse cycle. When the [NAME] was asked to test the machine with Chlorine Test Strips, the [NAME] was unable to produce correct test strips. The Surveyor notified the Dietary Supervisor that the facility could not use the dish machine until they were able to test it. The Dietary Supervisor said they would have to hand wash the breakfast dishes. During an interview on 08/07/23 at 8:44 a.m., the [NAME] said she had worked at the facility for thirteen months. She said she was taught to test the machine by a previous employee, and if she has a problem with the machine, she notifies the Dietary Supervisor. She said she had not notified the dietary supervisor of not being able to test the machine. She said not being able to properly sanitize the dishes could make the residents sick. She said she did not know how long it hadn't been working, she said they currently did not have a maintenance man, but he didn't work on the dish machine when they had one. During an interview on 08/07/23 at 10:30 a.m., the Dietary Supervisor said the service technician had just been out last week and checked the dish machine and it was ok. She said she had the test strips, but they were dropped in water, over the weekend and would not work. She said the technician was on his way to the facility to fix the machine and to bring her some more test strips. She said they would stop using the machine until he fixed it, and it tested properly. During an interview on 08/09/23 at 8:33 a.m., with the DS, she said the service technician had just been out last week. She said she did not know the temperature gage was not working. She said the service technician came back out Monday afternoon 08/07/23 and fixed the temperature gage and brought her some more test strips. Surveyor had the Dietary Supervisor to test the machine and it tested at 50 ppm chlorine sanitation and water temperature of 120 degrees F. She said her expectation for the dish machine was for the staff to be able to correctly test the dish machine as required. She said she expects them to notify her if the dish machine does not test properly. She said the dish machine not sanitizing the dishes could make the residents sick. She said the dishes had to be clean. During an interview on 08/09/23 at 3:30 p.m., the Administrator said she expected the staff to test the dish machine before use as required. She said if the dish machine was not working, she needs them to call out the service technician to test the machine. She said the dishes not being sanitized could make the residents sick. Review of a policy titled Dish machine Use; revised April 2006 indicates: 4. Dish machine chemical sanitizer temperatures and concentrations will be as follows: Chlorine 25-100mg/L and minimum water temperature of 120 degrees F. 5. A supervisor will check the dish machine for proper concentrations of sanitizer solution [measured as parts per million (PPM) or ml/L] after filling the dish machine with water. 6. Corrective action will be taken immediately is sanitizer level is too low. 7. The operator will check temperatures using the machine gage with each dish machine cycle and will record the results in a facility approved log. The operator will monitor the gage frequently during the dish washing cycle. Inadequate temperatures will be reported to the supervisor and corrected immediately. 9. If hot water or chemical sanitation concentrations do not meet requirements, cease use of dish machine immediately until temperatures or PPM are adjusted.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 5 (Residents #9 and #16) residents reviewed for infection control in that: MA A failed to follow infection control measures when instilling eye drops into Resident #9's eye. Agency CNA I did not wash or sanitize her hands or change her gloves while performing incontinent care to Resident #16. These failures could place residents at risk of exposure to communicable diseases and infections. Findings: 1.Record review of the facility face sheet dated 8/08/2023 indicated Resident #9 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] for diagnoses of pancreatitis (infection of pancreas) and cerebral palsy (disorder that affects movement, muscle tone, balance, and posture). Record review of a quarterly MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident #9 had a BIMS score of 15 indicating intact cognition. Record review of the consolidated physicians order dated 7/31/2023 indicated Resident #9 had an order for Prolensa Ophthalmic Solution instill 1 drop in left eye two times a day. During a medication administration observation on 08/08/23 at 08:45 am, MA A administered Resident # 9's prescribed eye drops. During eye drop administration MA A touched the tip of the container to Resident #9's eye. During an interview on 08/08/2023 at 08:55 am, MA A stated that she had been a medication aide since November 2022 and received her medication aide training at another facility and when she started at this facility someone overseen and trained her to give medications correctly. She stated she had training on infection control measures. She stated she should not have touched Resident #9's eye with the tip of the container because of infection control. During an interview on 8/08/2023 at 12:41 pm, the DON stated she was responsible for oversight and training for all medication aides and for ensuring all medications were giving accurately and safely. She stated she was responsible for the infection control program and expected all MA's and nurses to follow infection control measures when administering medications and all staff were trained on infection control measures. She stated she would begin retraining all staff on infection control measures during medication administration. She stated the risk of not instilling eye drops properly could cause an infection. During an interview on 08/10/23 at 08:46 am the administrator stated the DON was responsible for training all nurses and MA's on proper medication administration including following doctor's orders, labeling, and infection control. She stated she expected all nurses and MA's to administer medications appropriately to prevent a drug reaction, infection, or medication error. 2. Record review of an admission Record dated 8/9/2023 for Resident #16 indicated she admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was [AGE] years old with diagnoses of paraplegia (paralyzed in the legs and lower body), schizoaffective disorder (mental health condition with symptoms of both mood disorders and psychotic disorders), bipolar type (extreme mood swings that range from depressive lows and manic highs), COPD (a group of lung diseases that block airflow making breathing hard) and dissociative identity disorder (having two or more separate personalities). Record review of a care plan for Resident #16 undated indicated she had an ADL self-care performance related to paralysis with interventions for toilet use and she required 1-2 staff participation. Record review of a Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #16 indicated she did not have any impairment in thinking with a BIMS score of 14. She required extensive assistance with personal hygiene with one-person physical assist. She was frequently incontinent or urine and always incontinent of bowel. During an observation on 8/08/2023 at 9:25 AM in Resident #16's room , Agency CNA I was present to provide incontinent care. Agency CNA I removed gloves from the pocket of her scrub top and placed gloves on both hands without washing or sanitizing her hands. Resident #16 removed her oxygen tubing, and Agency CNA I placed the tubing on the foot of the bed. Agency CNA I opened a new clean brief for Resident #16 and placed it between her legs. She removed a wipe from the container and wiped Resident #16's perineal area from front to back and placed the wipe in the trash. She rolled Resident #16 onto her left side and removed a wipe from the container. Resident #16 had a bowel movement. Agency CNA I cleaned Resident #16's rectal area from front to back using multiple wipes and placed them in the trash. Agency CNA I removed the soiled brief and placed it in the trash. Agency CNA I did not remove her gloves and continued with incontinent care and placed a clean brief underneath Resident #16's buttocks. Agency CNA I rolled Resident #16 onto her back and secured the brief. Agency CNA I repositioned Resident #16 in the bed and handed Resident #16 her O2 tubing, and Resident #16 positioned it in her nostrils. Agency CNA I removed her gloves and placed them in the trash and did not wash or sanitize her hands following the incontinent care provided. During an interview on 8/08/2023 at 9:30 AM, Agency CNA I said she was contracted staff through an agency that had been coming to the facility often to cover shifts. She said she had been a CNA since 2019. She said the facility did not provide her any training on any topics including infection control. She said she received training on infection control outside of the facility through the staffing agency. She said she would not have done anything differently with the incontinent care she provided to Resident #16. She said she was taught to change gloves only after completing incontinent care. She said during incontinent care if the gloves were visibly dirty, then she would have changed them, but they were not dirty. She said the only time she performed hand hygiene was after she provided incontinent care to the residents and not any time before. During an interview on 8/9/2023 at 3:00 PM, the DON said she had been employed at the facility since March 13, 2023. She said she was responsible for the infection control program and expected all nurse aides to follow infection control. She said she was not aware Agency CNA I was not washing or sanitizing her hands before and after care to the residents. She said gloves should be changed after incontinent care, when leaving the room, and after going from clean to dirty. She said residents were at risk for cross contamination and infection control with spreading germs to other residents. She said the facility had completed training on infection control and hand hygiene, but agency staff were not included. She said agency staff were expected to follow policy but if there was an issue with agency staff then they would do a corrective action with them. During an interview on 8/10/2023 at 10:05 AM, the Administrator said all staff including agency should be following the facility policy on hand washing/hygiene. She said going forward all staff would be trained on hand hygiene including agency staff. She said residents were at risk for infection if staff did not adhere to the hand hygiene policy. Record review of a facility policy titled Handwashing/Hygiene with a revised date of August 2019 indicated, .This facility considers hand hygiene the primary means to prevent the spread of infections. 1. All personnel shall be trained and regularly in-serviced on the importance of hand hygiene in preventing the transmission of healthcare-associated infections. 7. Use an alcohol-based hand rub containing at least 62% alcohol; or, alternatively, soap and water for the following situations: b. Before and after direct contact with residents; h. Before moving from a contaminated body site to a clean body site during resident care; l. After contact with objects (e.g., medical equipment) in the immediate vicinity of the resident; m. After removing gloves . Record review of facility policy titles Instillation of Eye Drops dated January 2014 indicated, .8. drop the medication into the mid lower eyelid (Do not touch the eye or eyelid with the dropper) .
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0727 (Tag F0727)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to use the services of a registered nurse for at least eight consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week for 2 of 3 months reviewed. (January 2023 ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to use the services of a registered nurse for at least eight consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week for 2 of 3 months reviewed. (January 2023 and February 2023) The facility did not have RN coverage for 2 days in February 2023. The facility did not have RN coverage for 1 day in January 2023. This failure could place residents at risk by leaving staff without supervisory coverage for RN specific nursing activities and for coordination of events such as an emergency care and disasters. Findings included: Record review of the CMS PBJ (Payroll Based Journal) report for the second quarter of 2023 (January 1, 2023 through March 31, 2023) indicated there was no RN hours for the following dates: 01/21/2023, 01/31/2023, 02/18/2023, 02/19/2023, 02/25/2023, 02/26/2023, 3/06/2023, and 3/31/2023. Record review of a timecard report for 01/31/2023, 02/25/2023, 02/26/2023, 3/06/2023, and 3/31/2023 indicated an RN was present and worked 8 consecutive hours on those days however on 01/21/2023, 02/18/2023, and 02/19/2023 scheduled RN was not in the facility for 8 consecutive hours. Record review of the staffing agency time sheet for RN B indicated RN B worked 6 hours and 3 minutes on 01/21/2023, 6 hours and 23 minutes on 02/18/2023, and 7 hours and 9 minutes on 02/19/2023. During an interview on 08/08/2023 at 11:00 am, the DON stated she was hired in March 2023 and was not sure regarding previous RN coverage. She stated she was responsible for ensuring an RN was in the facility 8 hours a day 7 days a week either from a charge nurse or administrative nurse position. She stated she expected the RN on shift to work 8 consecutive hours. She stated not having an RN could affect the resident if an emergency was to occur. During an interview on 08/10/23 at 08:42 AM, the Administrator stated she had been at the facility for 3 years. She stated the DON was responsible for ensuring that an RN was on shift 8 hours a day 7 days a week. She stated she would verify that the shift was covered with DON if the schedule was open on the weekend or if the DON was off. She stated she was not aware that RN B did not work their full shift on 01/21/2023, 02/18/2023, and 02/19/2023. She stated she expected that the required RN hours were complete every day and by not having an RN at the facility 8 hours a day 7 days a week could affect resident health. Record review of facility policy dated August 2006 titled Departmental Supervision indicated, .3.RN coverage is required 8 hours a day 7 days a week.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Room Equipment (Tag F0908)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain all mechanical, electrical, and patient care ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain all mechanical, electrical, and patient care equipment, in safe operating condition, for 1 of 1 stove in the kitchen reviewed for food service in that: The facility did not ensure the gas stove was in working order. Two of six gas stove burners did not light automatically, when the knob was turned. (Rear, middle, and right side). The pilot lights on the burners would not stay lit. The oven door was missing the spring in the door which kept it from falling open heavily when you open it. This failure could place residents who eat out of the kitchen at risk for injury and under cooked food. Findings include: During an observation and interview on 08/09/23 at 9:00 a.m., the rear middle and rear right burners of the stove would not light from the pilot when the knob was turned. The DS said the stove was old and the pilot lights would not stay lit. She said the maintenance man from another facility in [NAME], worked on the stove on Monday but the pilot lights still would not stay lit, and they had been like that awhile. During an interview on 08/09/23 at 2:15p.m., the Maintenance Director said he was from another facility, he said the previous maintenance man left a week ago. He said he was just there to try and help. He said he had adjusted the pilot light on Monday. During an interview on 08/09/23 at 2:30 p.m., with the DS, she said she had been the DS a year last April. She said the technician had been out and worked on the stove before but could not fix the stove because it was so old, they couldn't get the part (spring) which keeps the door from flopping open when you open it. She said the burners not lighting when the knob was turned could cause gas to build up and cause a fire, which could harm the residents. She said the oven door was heavy and if it flopped open it could burn or hurt someone. During an interview on 08/09/23 at 10:45a.m., the Administrator said she expected the stove to work correctly when the knob is turned. She said the pilot light not lighting could cause a gas leak and possible injury to the staff, and residents if a fire was to break out. She said the oven door flopping open could cause the food to be under cooked which could make the residents sick or hurt someone. During the survey the DS was asked on entry 08/07/23 at 8:58 a.m., for a policy on essential equipment. On 08/08/23 at 10:40 a.m., the Administrator was asked for a policy on essential equipment and again on 08/09/23 at 12:41p.m., the DS was asked for a policy for essential equipment. The facility provided a policy on Safety Precautions, Food Services which did not address the stove
MINOR (C)

Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact

Staffing Data (Tag F0851)

Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, including information for agency and contract staff, b...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, including information for agency and contract staff, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data in a uniform format according to specifications established by CMS fiscal year 2023 for the second quarter (January 1, 2023 to March 31, 2023) reviewed for administration. The facility failed to submit accurate RN hours for 01/21/2023, 01/31/2023, 02/18/2023, 02/19/2023, 02/25/2023, 02/26/2023, 3/06/2023, and 3/31/2023. This failure could place residents at risk for personal needs not being identified and met. The findings included: Record review of the CMS PBJ (Payroll Based Journal) report for the second quarter of 2023 (January 1, 2023, through March 31, 2023) indicated there was no RN hours for the following dates: 01/21/2023, 01/31/2023, 02/18/2023, 02/19/2023, 02/25/2023, 02/26/2023, 3/06/2023, and 3/31/2023. Record review of a timecard report for 01/31/2023, 02/25/2023, 02/26/2023, 3/06/2023, and 3/31/2023 indicated an RN was present and worked 8 consecutive hours on those days however on 01/21/2023, 02/18/2023, and 02/19/2023 scheduled RN was not in the facility for 8 consecutive hours. Record review of the staffing agency time sheet for RN B indicated RN B worked 6 hours and 3 minutes on 01/21/2023, 6 hours and 23 minutes on 02/18/2023, and 7 hours and 9 minutes on 02/19/2023. During an interview on 8/09/2023 at 12:33 pm, the BOM stated she had been at the facility for less than a year. She stated she only transmitted the time clock punches to payroll and did not have any dealings with the PBJ submissions and reports. She stated corporate handled PBJ submission. She stated she reviewed the time punches and entered salary employee hours but did not have a process for checking for the RN hours daily. During an interview on 8/09/2023 at 12:38 pm, the administrator stated PBJ was calculated and submitted at the corporate level. She stated an RN had been in the facility daily either from a charge nurse or DON and was not aware the agency nurse had not worked the full 8 hours on 1/21/2023, 2/18/2023 and 2/19/2023. She stated she expected that all RN's worked the required 8 consecutive hours, and that payroll was submitted correctly to PBJ. She stated she was unsure of the risk. During an interview on 08/10/23 at 8:53 am, the accounts payable manager stated she gathered the hours from the facility and submitted the information for the PBJ report. She stated the facility BOM was responsible for ensuring all worked hours were entered into the time clock. She stated she did not review the hours she received and only sent in the report. She stated she did not know the risk of inaccurate PBJ reports. Record review of a facility policy dated October 2017 titled Reporting Direct-Care Staffing Information (Payroll-Based Journal) indicated, .Staffing and census information will be reported electronically to CMS through the Payroll-Based Journal System in compliance with 6106 of the Affordable Care Act. 10. Staffing data includes the number of hours worked each day by each staff member . Record review of facility policy dated August 2006 titled Departmental Supervision indicated, .3.RN coverage is required 8 hours a day 7 days a week.
Jun 2023 1 deficiency 1 IJ
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for 1 of 22 residents (Residen...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for 1 of 22 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for Resident Abuse. CNA A hit Resident #1 in the face resulting in redness and bleeding from his right nostril. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The immediate jeopardy (IJ) began and ended on 6/15/23. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the survey began. These failures could place residents at risk of physical harm, mental anguish, emotional distress, or death. Findings included: Review of a face-sheet dated 06/17/23 showed Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old male first admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Alzheimer's Disease with late onsite, Dementia with other behavioral disturbances, Psychotic disorder with delusions due to known physiological condition, major depression, diabetes, and anxiety. Review of MDS dated [DATE] showed Resident #1 had a BIMS score of 7, which indicated he was alert to person but had severe to moderate cognition deficit. He required one-person assistance with bed mobility, personal hygiene, and toileting. Resident #1 was always incontinent to bladder. Review of a care plan dated 03/09/23 showed Resident #1 was a moderate risk for falling due to confusion. Resident #1 was having adjustment issues since admission. CNAs were to provide Resident #1 with as many situations as possible which would give him control over his environment and care delivery. Resident #1 resided on the secure unit and had a history of exit seeking behaviors. Resident #1 had cognitive dementia, impaired thought process and impaired decision-making skills. CNAs were to provide Resident with necessary cues-stop and return if agitated. When conflict arises, CNAs were to remove Resident #1 to a calm environment and allow to vent and share feelings. Resident #1 had communication problems due to language barrier. Resident #1 speaks Spanish and understands English. Staff were to encourage Resident #1 to continue stating thoughts even if Resident #1 was having difficulty. Staff were to focus on a word or phrase that makes sense or respond to the feeling resident was trying to express. Resident #1 had a history of physical aggression toward staff. Staff were to provide ADL and incontinent care as needed. During an interview on 06/17/23 at 11:30 a.m. and review of a video surveillance tape provided by the administrator dated 06/15/23, showed on 06/15/23 at 2:14 AM, Resident #1 (Identified by the administrator) was in the hallway on the secure unit. Resident #1 and CNA A (Identified by the administrator) had a physical altercation involving physically hitting. It was not clear as to which one hit who because of the distance away from the camera, but later in the video, CNA A was seen near the exit door when Resident #1 approached CNA A. CNA A was observed pushing Resident #1 in the face with her hand and pushing Resident #1 away. CNA A was observed attempting to run away from Resident #1 by quickly moving around Resident #1 and running down the hallway. During an interview on 06/19/23 at 9:21 a.m. with assistance from RTA A, who served as Spanish/English interpreter, Resident #1 said he remembered the incident with CNA A. Resident #1 said he was standing in the hallway talking to CNA A when she kicked him two times. Resident #1 said CNA A did not kick or hit him in his room. Resident #1 said CNA A scratched him on his nose. Resident #1 said the bleeding on his nose was from the scratch, but he did not know if it was from fingernails or jewelry. Resident #1 said the nurse took him to the nurse's station. Resident #1 said he was not in pain when he was at the nurse's station, but he was upset because he wanted to hit CNA A and couldn't. Resident #1 said he felt safe when he was at the nurse's station, but he did not know if other staff working at the facility would hurt him. During an interview on 06/18/23 at 1:49 p.m., CNA A said she was working on A-Hall, (Men's secure unit) on 06/15/23 on the night shift. CNA A said around 2:30 a.m., she heard Resident #1 yelling and went to see what he needed. CNA A said she had changed Resident # earlier that evening with no issue. CNA A said when she attempted to provide incontinent care to Resident #1, he became combative and started hitting her and pulling her hair. CNA A said Resident #1's nose may have been scratched by her jewelry at this time she attempted to get away from him, but she was not sure. CNA A said she did not hit Resident #1. CNA A said she left the room and went into the hallway. CNA A said she attempted to return to the room to provide care, but Resident #1 would not let her in the room. CNA A said she was standing in the hallway outside Resident #1's room when Resident #1 came out and started attaching her. CNA A said Resident #1 hit her on the left side of her head. CNA A said she went to the exit door and knocked to get the nurse's attention who was sitting at the nurse's station just outside the exit door. CNA A said when she turned around, she saw Resident #1, walking towards her in an aggressive manner. She said she held her hand out and told Resident #1 to go on. CNA A said she skited around Resident #1 and ran down the hall. CNA A said she did not remember pushing Resident #1 in the face. CNA A said LVN A opened the door. CNA A said LVN A came in the unit and took Resident #1 to the nurse's station. CNA A said the nurse asked her to make a written statement about what happened and asked her to clock out. CNA A said she clocked out and left the facility about 2:40 a.m. CNA A said when she started her shift on 06/14/23 at 10:00 p.m. the CNA who had been working the 2-10 shift told her Resident #1 was a fall risk and to keep an eye on him. CNA A said the CNA also told her that Resident #1 yells out in the night and to try to keep him calm and quit so he will not disturb the other residents. CNA A said this was the second time she had worked at the facility and had no problems the first time. During an interview on 06/19/23 at 12:03 p.m. LVN A said she was working on 06/15/23 on the night shift. LVN A said she was not assigned to A-hall (Men's secure unit) but was sitting at the nurse's desk just outside the unit, when she heard knocking at the exit door. LVN A said she opened the door and when she entered the unit, she saw CNA A. LVN A said CNA said Resident #1 was coming at her and she had to knock him out. LVN A said she escorted Resident #1 outside the unit to the nurse's station and observed blood on the right side of his nose. LVN A said she called the Administrator and DON to report the incident but did not get an answer. LVN A said she then call the Regional Nurse Consultant and received instructions to have CNA A write a statement, clock out and leave the facility. LVN A said she called the police to report the incident. LVN A said she contacted another CNA working at the time to cover A-hall. LVN A said while she was making phone calls and dealing with CNA A, LVN B cleaned the blood off Resident #1's nose and offered emotional support to Resident #1. LVN A said Resident #1 was visibly upset at the time and crying. LVN A said her assessment of Resident #1 at the time showed no other injuries other than the skin tear on his nose. During an interview on 06/19/23 at 9:41 a.m. the DON said she had been the DON at the facility since March 2023. The DON said on 06/15/23 at 2:30 a.m. she missed a call from the facility because the ringer on her phone was off. The DON said at 5:30 a.m. she noticed the missed call and called the facility. The DON said LVN A told her about the incident and said she had contacted the Regional Nurse Consultant. The DON said LVN A had already contacted the police. The DON said she arrived at the facility around 8:00 a.m. and the Medical Director was also at the facility. The DON said the Medical Director ordered x-rays for Resident #1, but Resident #1 said his hip was hurting so it was decided to discontinue the orders for x-rays and send Resident #1 to the hospital for evaluation and treatment to be on the safe side. The DON said CNA A was immediately asked to clock out and leave the facility. The DON said CNA A worked for an agency and the agency was contacted and told CNA A could not longer work at the facility. The DON said In-service training on preventing, identifying, and reporting resident abuse and neglect. The DON said staff also received training on resident rights and dealing with residents with aggressive behaviors. The DON said staff will be trained prior to working their next shift. The DON said the QAPI plan for intervention included that only employees of the facility will work in the secure units and agency staff will not work in the units unless there is no other alternative. The DON said she and the Administrator are responsible to ensure all staff are trained and they are to monitor to ensure compliance with the QAPI plan. During an interview on 06/17/23 at 2:55 p.m. Administrator said CNA A was an agency staff and first worked for the facility on 05/30/23 for one shift. Administrator said on 06/15/23 CNA A was working the night shift on the men's secure unit. Administrator said this was the second time CNA A had worked at the facility. Administrator said she was notified of the incident and reported the incident to the medical director, agency employer, the local police, Resident #1's family (RP), and the state agency as required. Administrator said after the incident staff received training on abuse prohibition, resident rights and dealing with residents with aggressive behaviors. Administrator said notification was given to the employment agency that CNA A is not longer eligible to work at the facility due to physically abusing Resident #1. Administrator said on 06/15/23 the QAPI had a meeting to discuss interventions to ensure residents were safe from abuse. Review of QAPI notes dated 06/15/23 showed a meeting was held to discuss the incident with Resident #1 and CNA A on 06/15/23. Members present included the administrator, DON, Medical Director, MDS Coordinator, Charge Nurse, Social Worker, and Dietary Supervisor. The interventions and plan for correction included o Agency Staff was removed immediately o Notified Agency Staff Employer of incident o Made a police Report o Sent resident to hospital for eval and treatment o DON completed skin assessment on all residents on a hall emotional assessment completed on Resident #1 o Abuse/neglect training to be completed with all staff o Staff working on the secure units will be employees of the facility and not agency staff. Review of nurse progress notes written by LVN A for Resident #1 dated 06/15/23 at 2:30 a.m. showed CNA banged on door to get someone's attention from outside the unit. LVN A, walked to the A hall unit to see what was going on. After arriving the CNA said, I had to lay him out because he tried to jump on me, he tried to fight on me, and I had to lay him out LVN asked who? Resident began walking out of his room and CNA pointed at resident and said, Him, him right there. CNA said, I tried to change him, and he refused and charged at me and does he do that all the time. LVN A replied, yes, he does sometimes. Resident began speaking in Spanish and said in English, Someone call the police. LVN A immediately removed resident off the unit to separate both parties. LVN A and LVN B immediately began calling Administrator, DON and ADON. LVN B performed care to Resident #1 was active bleeding on the right side of his nose. LVN B clean up his nose. LVN A called the sheriff's office and was given direct time of 7:30 AM, when sheriff office will come to the facility. Review of nurse progress notes Resident #1 dated 06/15/23 at 10:42 a.m. the DON recorded Due to resident's progressive pain to hip and abrasion to face, decided to send resident to ER for further evaluation. Review of nurse progress notes written by LVN C for Resident #1 dated 06/15/23 at 10:49 a.m. showed Ambulance arrived at this time to transfer resident to ER. Awake and alert at time of leaving this facility. Review of nurse progress notes written by the administrator for Resident #1 dated 06/15/23 at 12:17 PM, Administrator spoke with RP regarding altercation this morning. A police report had been filed and the case number is OR-06152301. Review of hospital records for Resident #1 dated 06/15/23 showed: Resident #1 arrived at ER. Complaint: Fall injury to [AGE] year-old- male .presented to emergency department .from home with complaints of hip pain. The patient reports that he had a fall last night landing on his left side injuring his hip. Patient notes that he was assaulted by a medical aide at the nursing home and would like a CT scan. (A scan combines a series of X-ray images taken from different angles around your body and uses computer) Patient has had Tylenol .is not on blood thinner .also complained of chest pain. Review of X-ray report for Resident #1 dated 06/15/23 at 12:58 PM, showed no fractures to pelvis. Review of CT scan of Resident #1's head dated 06/15/23 at 2:27 PM showed Clinical indication: Assault. Findings included: No Acute intracranial hemorrhage (No bleeding), No acute infarction (obstruction of the blood supply). No acute intracranial abnormalities (nothing abnormal found). Review of nurse progress notes written by LVN C for Resident #1 dated 06/15/23 at 4:20 PM, Resident returned to facility at 3:40 PM. MD notified. Recommendation from NP to monitor per nursing protocol and to notify them of any increase in anxiety or unusual behavior. On 06/19/2023, the surveyor confirmed the facility implemented appropriate measures to ensure the safety of residents after the incident on 06/15/23 involving Resident #1 and CNA A by: 4 LVN's (on all shifts) 6 CNA's (on all shifts) said they received training regarding resident abuse, neglect, rights and dealing with residents with aggressive behaviors. The nursing staff verbalized understanding of the trainings and said they were to follow resident's plan of care dealing with behaviors. Review of facility policy showed Residents have the right to be free from abuse . 1. Protect residents from abuse .by anyone including, a. facility staff, .c. staff from other agencies .j. any other individual. 7. Implement measures to address factors that may lead to abusive situation, for example: a. adequately prepare staff for caregiving responsibilities; . c. instruct staff regarding appropriate ways to address interpersonal conflicts, and help staff understand how cultural religious and ethnic differences can lead to misunderstanding and conflict. 8. Identify and investigate all possible incidents of abuse . 9 report any allegations within timeframe required by federal requirements. 10. Protect residents from any further harm during investigation. 11. Establish and implement a QAPI review and analysis of reports, allegations, or findings of abuse .
Apr 2023 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, if the events that cause the allegation involved abuse or resulted in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials, which included the State Survey Agency in accordance with State law through established procedures, for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for reporting allegations of abuse and neglect. The facility failed to report the allegations of abuse and neglect to other officials and the state survey agency within 2 hours after the allegation was made on behalf of Resident #1. This failure could place residents at risk for harm by abuse. The findings include: Review of Resident #1's admission Record, dated 03/31/2023, revealed he was a [AGE] year-old male with an admission date of 03/21/2023 from an acute hospital. He had an initial admission date of 04/14/2022, with diagnoses which included altered mental status, Alzheimer's disease with late onset, dementia, major depressive disorder, cognitive communication deficit, psychotic disorder due to known physiological condition, and cerebral infarction [disruptive blood flow to the brain]. Review of Resident #1's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed Resident #1's assessment for behaviors revealed no exhibited physical or verbal behavior directed towards others and required assistance with transfers, urinary incontinence, showering, and dressing. Resident #1 was assessed with a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 09 / 15, indicating moderate impairment. Review of Resident #1's Care Plan, revised 03/30/2023, revealed Resident #1 was prone to skin tears and bruising of unknown origin related to fragile skin with a goal to remain free from serious injury or complications from minor injury and indicated he had a yellow bruise to his neck and chest on 03/30/23. Interventions included: 3/30/23 - monitor bruise at neck x 14 days; All injuries will be monitored until they are resolved; Notify charge nurse of any new bruises or skin tears; Notify MD (Medical Director) and RR (Resident Representative) of any abnormal findings; and Physician will be notified of all events and treatment orders obtained. Review of Resident #1's Progress Notes, dated 03/30/2023, revealed he had a bruise to his neck to be monitored for 14 days. Review of Provider Investigation Report, signed by the administrator on 04/05/2023, revealed Resident #1 had an incident category of abuse reported to HHSC on 03/31/2023 at 1:59 PM. Description of the allegation revealed that the resident reported a big black man threw him onto the bed causing bruising around his neck and chest. Description of injury indicated a deep purple bruise with yellow-green on the perimeter to his left neck and a golf ball size dark purple bruise to his chest with greenish-yellow edges upon assessment on 03/30/2023 at 2:00 PM. Provider response included resident assessment for injuries and was noted with bruising on the neck and chest; notification to Ombudsman, responsible party and physician assistant; witness statements; camera review; and in-services to include Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation - Reporting and Investigating. Investigation summary indicated abuse allegation was unfounded and revealed documentation issues that were addressed with 1 on 1 education and in-service education regarding documentation of completing skin assessments and required notifications for skin issues. Based on staff statements and camera footage the facility determined Resident #1 had bruising when he returned from the hospital. Provider action taken post investigation included to continue in-services on Investigating Resident Injuries, Preventing Resident Abuse, Recognizing Signs and Symptoms of Abuse/Neglect, Abuse Investigations, Preventing Resident Accident and Incident, Reporting Abuse to Facility Management, Required Notifications for Skin Issues, Skin Assessment, and Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation - Reporting and Investigating. During an interview on 03/31/2023 at 9:15 a.m., RP A said Resident #1 had bruising to his chest and neck. RP A said she reported to the administrator on 03/30/2023 that the resident reported a tall black man snatched and pulled Resident #1 down causing the bruise to his chest and neck. During an interview on 03/31/2023 at 11:48 a.m., the administrator said she was the abuse coordinator and was aware of one abuse allegation reported by Resident #1 and his power of attorney yesterday on 03/30/2023. The administrator said Resident #1 reported a tall black man pulled him down and was responsible for the bruising to his chest and neck. The administrator said CNA A met the alleged description and that she had not completed reviewing camera footage for the unit. The administrator said she reviewed Resident #1's hospital records and revealed that Resident #1 became unresponsive during his hospital stay and painful stimuli such as a sternum rub was administered. The administrator said the painful stimuli was considered a possible cause of his bruising. The administrator said she was responsible for reporting allegations of abuse to state authorities and did not report Resident #1's allegation to HHSC because Resident #1 had bruising when he returned from the hospital. The administrator said she did not notify the police of the allegation. During an interview on 03/31/2023 at 12:38 p.m., CNA A said he was not aware of any allegations of abuse. CNA A said he had been employed at the facility for seven and a half years and worked with Resident #1 often. CNA A said if he suspected abuse, he would immediately report to the administrator and that it was important to report any abuse allegations to protect residents from harm. During an observation and interview on 12:49 p.m., CNA A entered Resident #1's room while the resident was resting in bed and demonstrated Resident #1's wheelchair locks were functioning. CNA A interacted with Resident #1's roommate. During an interview on 03/31/2023 at 1:29 p.m., the administrator said there were no grievances for February 2023 or March 2023. The administrator said that she had not completed a grievance for Resident #1's allegation because she was trying to decide if she would or would not self-report the allegation to HHSC. The administrator said that she had decided she would self-report today within a 24 hour timeframe. She said it was important to notify state authorities of abuse concerns to protect residents at risk for further abuse. During an interview on 03/31/2023 at 2:07 p.m., the administrator said she submitted a self-report on 03/31/2023 at 1:59 PM for Resident #1's alleged abuse incident. During an interview on 04/05/2023 at 1:38 p.m., the MD said he was unaware of any allegations of abuse regarding Resident #1 and had not been contacted regarding any abuse allegations. The MD said he expected the facility to contact him with any abuse concerns. During an interview on 04/05/2023 at 2:13 p.m., the administrator said she did not know if the MD was notified of Resident #1's abuse allegation, and that the MD should be notified of any allegations of abuse. During an interview on 04/05/2023 at 3:30 p.m., the administrator said social services had not been at the facility to meet with Resident #1 since the reported abuse allegation and that safe surveys had not been conducted on residents. The administrator said she would protect residents from further abuse during the investigation by suspending staff that met the alleged description until completion of investigation, monitoring residents, and reviewing camera footage during alleged timeframe of suspected abuse. The administrator said CNA A was not suspended even though he met the description because Resident #1 and his power of attorney denied CNA A as the potential perpetrator when directly asked at the time of initial report. The administrator said as a result of the investigation, the facility has notified the Ombudsman, educated staff via in-services, conducted witness statements, reviewed camera surveillance, and monitored for individuals that met the description in the allegation. The administrator said there was a concern identified with a lack in documentation for Resident #1 and did not believe any additional residents were affected or at risk. The administrator said the facility informed nurses to document any bruising and ensure that representatives and physicians were notified. The administrator said she reviewed with nursing staff that they are expected to follow up and make sure that any change in skin has been reported even if they believe the bruising occurred on another shift. The administrator said the Quality Assurance team consisted of departmental head staff, physician, and that there had not been a meeting held with the physician regarding additional recommendations on Resident #1's alleged abuse. The administrator said she would report allegations of abuse to HHSC depending on if there was serious bodily injury or not. The administrator said if there was no serious bodily injury, she would report abuse allegations within 24 hours and if there was serious injury or confirmed assault, she would report within 2 hours. During an interview on 04/05/2023 at 3:50 p.m., the administrator said she understood that any allegations of abuse should be reported within 2 hours to HHSC in accordance with policy and that she was ultimately responsible for not reporting Resident #1's incident within the 2-hour timeframe. Review of facility policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, or Misappropriation - Reporting and Investigating, revised April 2021, revealed, Policy Statement: All reports of resident abuse (including the injuries of unknown origin), neglect, exploitation, or theft misappropriation of resident property are reported to local, state and federal agencies (as required by current regulations) and thoroughly investigated by facility management. Findings of all investigations are documented and reported. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: Reporting allegations to the Administrator and authorities: If a resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property, or injury of unknown source is suspected; the suspicion must be reported immediately to the administrator and to other officials according to state law. The administrator or the individual making the allegation immediately reports his or her suspicion to the following persons or agencies: the state licensing certification agency responsible for surveying licensing the facility; the local state ombudsman; the residents representative; the residents attending physician; the facility's medical director; adult Protective Services; law enforcement; immediately is defined as within two hours of an allegation involving abuse or results in serious bodily injury or within 24 hours of an allegation that does not involve abuse or results in serious bodily injury . the individual conducting the investigation as a minimum: reviews the documentation and evidence; reviews the residence medical record to determine the resident's physical and cognitive status at the time of the incident and since the incident; observes the alleged victim, including his or her interactions with staff and other residents; interviews the person reporting the incident; interviews any witnesses to the incident; interviews the resident were the residents representative; interviews the residents attending physician; interview staff members who have had contact with the resident during the period of the alleged incident; interviews the residents roommate, family members, and visitors; interviews other residents to whom the accused employee provides care or services; reviews all events leading up to the alleged incident; and documents the investigation completely and thoroughly.
Dec 2022 1 deficiency 1 Harm
SERIOUS (H) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Deficiency F0925 (Tag F0925)

A resident was harmed · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program and ensure...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program and ensure the facility was free of pests for 3 of 8 residents (Resident's #1, #2 and #3) reviewed for incidents and accidents related to pests. The facility failed to ensure ants were kept out of the rooms and beds of Resident #1, #2 and #3. This failure could place residents at risk for ant bites and injury due to an ineffective pest control program at the facility. Findings included: 1. Record review of an admission Record dated 12/19/2022 for Resident #1 indicated he admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was [AGE] years old with diagnosis of dementia (difficulty remembering), iron deficiency anemia (low oxygen in the blood), Alzheimer's disease (a progressive disease that destroys memory), and COPD (a group of lung diseases). Record review of A Significant Change MDS Assessment for Resident #1 dated 9/12/2022 indicated he had severe impairment in thinking with a BIMS score of 6. He required extensive assistance with bed mobility, transfers, dressing, eating, toilet use and personal hygiene. Record review of a care plan for Resident #1 (undated) indicated he had an actual impairment to skin integrity related to ant bites on right rib cage and right upper thigh. Interventions included for Ecolab call for ground rounds for insects, avoid scratching and keep hands and body parts from excessive moisture, keep fingernails short, and follow facility protocols for treatment for injury. Record review of a self-report to the state agency dated 11/10/2022 indicated an incident occurred at the facility on 11/10/022 with Resident #1. Resident #1 was found in his bed with ants on him. Ants were removed by staff and upon investigation it was noted that Resident #1 had multiple ant bites on his body. He was treated with hydrocortisone to the affected areas. Record review of a late entry nurse progress note dated 11/17/2022 with an effective date of 11/10/2022 by the DON indicated Resident #1 was assessed by the DON and LVN D and he had 12 to 15 red raised areas to the right rib cage area and approximately 20-25 bites were noted to his right hip/upper thigh area. Hydrocortisone cream was applied as ordered to prevent Resident #1 from scratching. Ants noted were immediately killed by staff and resident was immediately removed from the area and assessed and room was examined for entry site as well and Ecolab to be contacted. No noted entry site could be determined at this time. Administrator updated on findings and action taken/needed. During an observation and interview on 12/19/2022, Resident #1 was sitting up in a wheelchair in his room alert to person, place, and time. He said he had been a resident at the facility for a long time. He said he was in the bed when he was bitten by ants not too long ago. He said he felt where they stung him on his body. He said he has not noticed any ants since that incident. He said the staff got him out of bed, treated the bites and pest control came out and sprayed his room. 2. Record review of an admission Record dated 12/19/2022 for Resident #2 indicated he admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was [AGE] years old with diagnoses of Alzheimer's Disease (a progressive disease that destroys memory), major depressive disorder (persistent feeling of sadness or loss of interest), malignant neoplasm of prostate (cancer in the prostate) and hypertension (high blood pressure). Record review of a Significant Change MDS Assessment for Resident #2 dated 10/25/2022 indicated he had moderate impairment in thinking with a BIMS score of 9. He required extensive assistance with bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene. Record review of an undated care plan for Resident #2 indicated a focus of ants in room. Interventions included 9 pm rounds by nursing staff for pest monitoring/source of pest attractions, Ecolab notified and will be here on 12/20/2022 to treat rooms affected and facility grounds, every 30-minute monitoring for 72 hours and every shift rounds for pests or sources that attract pests. Record review of a nursing progress note for Resident #2 dated 12/16/2022 by LVN C indicated she was notified that Resident #2 had ants in the bed. Upon entering room aide had removed Resident #2 from the bed and ants were visible crawling on his sheets. There was about 50 ants crawling. Resident #2's clothing was removed, and he was assessed for pain and discomfort. Resident #2 was removed from the room and a shower was provided by the aide. Resident #2 was noted to have 20 ant bites in total. Resident #2's bedding was removed, and he was removed from the room to check for more ants. Administrator, DON, and Responsible party was notified. Resident #2 denied any itching at that time. During an interview on 12/19/2022 with CNA A said Resident #2 had ants in his bed on Friday 12/16/2022. She said maintenance came and sprayed in the men's secured unit for ants. She said Resident #3 had ants in his bed this morning found by CNA B. He was removed from his bed and taken to the shower. She said administration staff were notified. 3. Record review of an admission Record for Resident #3 dated 12/19/2022 indicated he admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was [AGE] years old with diagnoses of Type 2 diabetes, iron deficiency anemia (low oxygen in the blood), and major depressive disorder (persistent sadness or loss of interest). Record review of an admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #3 indicated he had moderate impairment in thinking with a BIMS score of 12. He required limited assistance with bed mobility and eating. He required supervision with transfers, dressing and toilet use. Record review of an undated care plan for Resident #3 indicated a focus of ants in room and actual impairment to skin integrity related to ant bites. Interventions included 9 pm rounds by nursing for pest monitoring/sources of pest attractions, Ecolab to be here 12/20/2022 to treat affected rooms and facility grounds, and every 30-minute surveillance for 72 hours. Record review of a pest control invoice from Ecolab dated 11/13/2022 indicated they treated the facility for ants and used a product called Wisdom Lawn Granular. Condition found/actions taken indicated that pest activity was found during service. Exterior area-ants noted during service, fire ants noted at front walks, this area serviced for ants. Record review of a pest control invoice from Ecolab dated 11/29/2022 indicated they treated he facility for ants and used a product called Tempo Ultra WP and the exterior area was treated. During an observation on 12/19/2022 at 10:24 AM in Resident #3's room, this surveyor noted 2 ants crawling on the electrical outlet behind the bed. Also 2 dead ants were noted on the nightstand by Resident #2's bed on top of a clean brief and a closed container of toothpaste. Resident #3 was not in the room at that time. During an interview on 12/19/2022 at 10:25 AM, the Administrator said last week the facility had ants that were found in the men's secured unit. She said she contacted pest control and was told he would be coming out tomorrow. She said Resident #1's room was an isolated event with the ants. She said they treated his room and has not had any ants in the facility since Friday 12/16/2022. She said at 9 pm the nursing staff conducted a check of all the beds to make sure no food or crumbs were in the beds. She said she called all this past weekend to make sure the staff were checking. She said the department heads treated the outside area of any ant beds they noted. She said one mound was found at the end of D hall that was treated and there was a pile between Hall C and D on this past Saturday. She said they were treating the ant mounds with Orthene ant killer. During an interview on 12/19/2022 at 10:33 AM, CNA B said the housekeepers reported to him this morning that they saw ants on the floor by the fall mat in Resident #3's room. He said he then went to the room and got Resident #3 out of bed but never saw any ants. He said last week ants were found in Resident #2's room, but they were on the floor by the baseboard and on the walls. He said he did not have any ant bites. He said Resident #3 had 15 ant bites on both hands and on his back when he took him to the shower. He said Resident #3 did not complain of any pain related to the ant bites, but LVN C did give him some pain medicine earlier following a fall. He said the ants have been a problem for a while. During an interview on 12/19/2022 at 10:49 AM, LVN C said CNA B came out and got her and said Resident #3 complained about being bitten this morning. She said Resident #3 had 15 ant bites on him. She said the bites were on different locations all over his body. She said there has been issues with ants at the facility for a long time. She said the ants are in various locations on the men's secured unit. She said Resident #2 had ants in his bed last Friday 12/16/22. She said CNA A went in the room to get Resident #2 up and she was called into his room, and he had 20 ant bites. She said they got Resident #2 out of the room and deep cleaned the room and sprayed. She said staff had to complete every 30-minute check on his room for 72 hours and it should end this morning. She said every evening the nurse at 9pm was supposed to go in and check to see if the room had ants or not and complete a progress note in the charting system. During an interview on 12/19/2022 at 11:15 AM, Ecolab pest control technician said he was called to come out to the facility on [DATE] and he treated the facility for ants. He said on 11/13/2022 he treated the exterior of the facility with a granular poison which was effective for ants. He said the facility has had a problem with ants for over 8 years since and he had been the technician coming to the facility. He said there was not a product that would be a 100% guarantee to stop them. He said he would be at the facility tomorrow 12/20/2022 to treat the exterior for ants with a poison called Tremidor that can only be used once every 6 months. He said the poison could not be put out when there was any chance of rain or precipitation. He said the poison was used to treat termites but was labeled for ants as well. He said he would treat the rooms that had ants present when he goes back along with any cracks or crevices. He said sanitation is a huge issue because the ants go into the facilities looking for food and could be in dirty linens etc. He said the facility should do daily walk arounds outside and treat the mounds as they see them and that would help prevent the ants from coming inside. During an interview and observation on 12/19/2022 at 12:10 PM, Resident #3 was in his room with CNA B present. Resident #3 said he had been a resident at the facility for a little while but was unable to recall exactly how long. He said ants were found in his bed this morning and he had been bitten on his hands and back. He had a total of 15 small red bumps noted to both hands and his back. He said there was a bag of food on his nightstand from yesterday that had ants in is as well earlier. During an interview and observation on 12/20/2022 at 9:58 AM, Resident #3's room has several ants crawling on the wall, ceiling and coming out of the electrical outlet behind the bed. Resident #3 was not in the room at that time. CNA B came into the room and observed the ants, he pulled the bedding back to check to be sure no ants were in the bed and on top of the linens, crumbs were present along with dirt debris present. CNA B said he would change the linens on the bed and notify the Administrator. During an observation and interview on 12/20/2922 at 10:00 AM, the Administrator and RDO were shown the ants in Resident #3's room. Resident #3 was not in the room. Both the Administrator and RDO said Ecolab would be coming to the facility today to spray and treat the room and exterior of the facility. She said Resident #3 was moved out of the room earlier today after and after Ecolab came to treat the room, Resident #3 would not be allowed to go back into the room for 24 hours. During an interview on 12/20/2022 at 12:30 PM, the Administrator said going forward the facility was going to have to do room round checks daily because the ants were more frequent than they had initially thought. She said Ecolab was present at this time and was going to spray a treatment that he can do every 6 months and will schedule for them to come out every 6-month spray. She said the risk involved with the residents and the current ant problem was that residents could get bitten and scratch the areas and cause an infection. Record review of a facility policy titled Pest Control with a revised date of May 2008 indicated, .Our facility shall maintain an effective pest control program. 1. This facility maintains an ongoing pest control program to ensure that the building is kept free from insects and rodents .
Jun 2022 8 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

PASARR Coordination (Tag F0644)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to coordinate with the LIDDA (Local intellectual and developmental dis...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to coordinate with the LIDDA (Local intellectual and developmental disability authorities) or LMHA (Local mental health authority) to schedule an interdisciplinary (IDT) meeting in a timely manner after admitting residents with MI (mental illness), ID (intellectual disability) or DD (developmental disability) or after a resident is determined to have MI, ID or DD through a resident review for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #6) reviewed for PASSR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) Assessments. The facility failed to coordinate with the state-designated authority by not conducting an IDT meeting within 14 calendar days after admission to the facility. This failure could place residents with mental illness at risk of not receiving services that would enhance their quality of life. Findings included: Record review of an admission Record dated 6/21/2022 for Resident #6 indicated he was [AGE] years old and admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included bipolar disorder (extreme mood swings), schizoaffective disorder (combination of mood and depression), hypertensive heart disease (heart problems because of high blood pressure) and chronic kidney disease (loss of kidney function). Record review of a Quarterly MDS Assessment for Resident #6 dated 3/20/2022 indicated he didn't have any impairment in thinking with a BIMS score of 15. He was independent in transfers but required set up help with dressing, eating, and toilet use. Record review of a Care Plan for Resident #6 dated 3/30/2022 indicated he was positive for PASSR related to mental illness. Resident # 6 refused IDT meeting with PASSR on 3/28/2022. Interventions included to schedule an IDT meeting with local authority, physician, family, and any other entities involved with his/her care within 14 days of an admission. Record review of a PL1 for Resident #6 dated 2/21/2022 by a psychiatric facility indicated he was positive for mental illness. Record review of a PASSR Comprehensive Service Plan (PSCP) from for Resident #6 indicated an initial meeting was conducted at the facility on 3/28/2022 with IDT members MDS Nurse, DON, Administrator, LA, and Resident #6 were in attendance. Resident #6 refused all services and refused to sign refusal or 1014. During an interview on 6/21/22 at 1:40 PM, the MDS Nurse said she had been employed at the facility since February 2022. She said Resident #6 admitted to the facility on [DATE] from a psychiatric hospital. She said his PL1, and PE was completed prior to his admission to the facility by the psychiatric facility. She said his initial care plan meeting was not conducted until 3/28/22. She said the local authority had problems seeing the information in the online portal and had her to complete a new PL1 on 3/25/2022 and they completed another PE on 3/28/2022. She said the care plan meeting was late and should have been conducted within 14 days of the resident admitting to the facility. She said she had received training from her Regional MDS Nurse on PASSR. She said the residents could be at risk of not receiving services. She said she had a plan in place to ensure new residents had a PL1 before admission to the facility and had been keeping a calendar with the dates of the care plan meetings. During an interview on 6/21/2022 at 1:45 PM, the Regional MDS Nurse said Resident #6 admitted to the facility on [DATE] from a psychiatric facility. She said the resident initially had a Pl1 and PE completed on 2/21/2022 by the psychiatric facility. She said there was an issue with the PE and the local authority had issues with seeing the information in the online portal. She said the LA asked the facility to complete another PL1 and that's when the MDS Nurse completed the PL1 on 3/25/2022. During an interview on 6/21/2022 at 1:50 PM, the LA said the LMHA in the county where the psychiatric facility was located were supposed to complete the PL1 and PE before admission to the facility. She said she was not able to locate any notes or comments in the online portal to indicate why another PL1 was completed on 3/25/2022. During an interview on 6/21/2022 at 3:24 PM, the Administrator said she was not aware Resident #6 did not have an initial care plan meeting within 14 days of admission to the facility. She said she talked with the MDS Nurse who confirmed that she had just transitioned from working as a charge nurse in the facility to the MDS position. She said going forward all residents would have their care plan meetings in the required time frame and a resident could risk missing out on needed services if they did not have an initial care plan meeting. Record review of a facility policy titled PL1/PASSR/IDT/NFSS/1012/PCSP with a revised date of 1/16/2019 indicated, .2. The Local Authority must be notified for the date and time of all Care Plan/IDT meeting for residents with a PE. For new admissions, this must be within 14 days of admission .
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0813 (Tag F0813)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed develop a policy to ensure safe and sanitary storage of r...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed develop a policy to ensure safe and sanitary storage of resident's food items for 2 of 7 resident personal refrigerators reviewed for food safety (Residents #16 and Resident #31). The facility did not implement the personal food policy related to personal refrigerators for Resident #16 and #31. The refrigerator for Resident #16 had a bottle of jelly, a jar of mayonnaise and a container of country crock that was expired. The refrigerator for Resident #31 had a bottle of steak sauce, 2 pints of milk and 2 containers of yogurt that was expired. These failures could place the residents at risk for food borne illnesses. The findings included: 1. Record review of an admission Record for Resident #16 dated 6/22/2022 indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was [AGE] years old with diagnoses of cerebral palsy (abnormal brain development often before birth), blindness in one eye, type 2 diabetes (blood sugar is too high), hypertension (high blood pressure), and unspecified intellectual disabilities (problems with thinking and learning). Record review of a Care Plan for Resident #16 undated indicated he has impaired cognitive function and impaired though processes related to intellectual disability and cerebral palsy. He has an ADL self-care performance deficit and required supervision and tray set up with eating. Record review of a Quarterly MDS Assessment for Resident #16 dated 4/28/2022 indicated he had severe impairment with thinking and a BIMS score of 7. He required limited assistance with transfers, dressing and personal hygiene. He required set up help with eating. During an observation on 6/20/2022 at 9:38 AM, Resident #16's personal refrigerator had a bottle of grape jelly dated 6/18/22, jar of mayonnaise dated 3/7/22, and a container of country crock dated 8/24/21. During an observation and interview on 6/21/2022 at 3:00 PM, the Administrator observed an expired bottle of grape jelly, a jar of mayonnaise and a container of country crock in Resident #16's personal refrigerator. She removed the expired food items. She said the department staff were responsible for checking the residents' personal refrigerators daily and on the weekends the RN was responsible. She said if a resident ate foods that were expired then they could get sick. She said she would in-service staff and require they check the food labels for expiration dates even when family brings food items to the residents. 2. Record review of an admission Record dated 6/22/2022 for Resident #31 indicated he admitted to the facility on [DATE] with an original admission date of 11/2/2021 and was [AGE] years old with diagnoses of dementia (memory loss), COPD (a group of lung diseases), major depressive disorder (depressed mood or loss of interest in activities), and age-related macular degeneration (an eye disease that causes vision loss). Record review of a Care Plan for Resident #31 undated indicated he has an ADL self-care performance deficit related to amputation of leg at knee. He requires set up to help with eating. He had impaired visual function related to glaucoma. Record review of a Quarterly MDS Assessment for Resident #31 dated 5/22/2022 indicated no impairment in thinking with a BIMS score of 14. He required supervision with set up help only with eating and one-person physical assist with bed mobility, transfers, and personal hygiene. During an observation on 6/20/2022 at 9:51 AM, the personal refrigerator of Resident #31 had a bottle of steak sauce dated 7/5/21, 1/2-pint 1% milk dated 6/12/22, 1/2-pint chocolate milk-fat free dated 5/31/22, small container of peach yogurt dated 2/7/22, and a small container of cherry vanilla yogurt dated 6/16/22. During an observation and interview on 6/21/2022 at 3:00 PM, the Administrator observed a bottle of steak sauce in Resident #31's personal refrigerator dated 7/5/21. The yogurt and milk had been removed. She removed the steak sauce. She said the department staff were responsible for checking the residents' personal refrigerators daily and on the weekends the RN was responsible. She said if a resident ate foods that were expired then they could get sick. She said she would in-service staff and require they check the food labels for expiration dates even when family brings food items to the residents. Record review of a facility policy title Refrigerators and Freezers with a revised date of December 2008 indicated, .This facility will ensure safe refrigerator and freezer maintenance, temperatures and sanitations and will observe food expiration guidelines. 7. All food shall be appropriately dated to ensure proper rotation by expiration dates. 8. Supervisors will be responsible for ensuring food items in refrigerators and freezers are not expired or past perish dates .
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program d...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infection for 1 out of 4 staff members (LVN D) observed for infection control. LVN D did not disinfect a blood glucose meter after use. This failure could place resident at risk of exposure of communicable diseases and infections. Findings included: Record review of an admission Record for Resident #16 dated 6/22/2022 indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was [AGE] years old with diagnoses of cerebral palsy (abnormal brain development often before birth), blindness in one eye, type 2 diabetes (blood sugar is too high), hypertension (high blood pressure), and unspecified intellectual disabilities (problems with thinking and learning). Record review of a Care Plan for Resident #16 undated indicated he has impaired cognitive function and impaired though processes related to intellectual disability and cerebral palsy. He has an ADL self-care performance deficit and required supervision and tray set up with eating. Record review of a Quarterly MDS Assessment for Resident #16 dated 4/28/2022 indicated he had severe impairment with thinking and a BIMS score of 7. He required limited assistance with transfers, dressing and personal hygiene. He required set up help with eating. During an observation on 6/21/2022 at 10:55 AM, LVN D obtained a blood glucose reading from Resident #16. She sanitized her hands before entering Resident #16's room and applied gloves. She entered the resident's room and checked his blood sugar using a one-time use lancet device. After she checked Resident #16's blood sugar she administered Novolog insulin to his right upper arm. She placed her gloves and glucometer strip in the trash. She sanitized her hands and placed glucometer back into the medication cart without cleaning or disinfecting it. During an interview and observation on 6/21/2022 at 11:02 AM, LVN D said she had been employed at the facility for a few months. When asked if she would have done anything differently with her observation, she said she would have cleaned the glucometer before placing it back in the cart. She said she forgot and was reminded by another nurse yesterday to clean the glucometer after each blood sugar check. She immediately placed gloves on her hands and used a Sanidex wipe to clean both glucometers that were present in the cart. During an interview on 6/21/2022 at 4:00 PM, the DON said the nurses were in-serviced monthly on a variety of topics. She said the nursing staff had been in-serviced on cleaning glucometers in the past. She said she would have LVN D complete a return demonstration and provide her education on the protocol expected. She said LVN D would receive training 1 on 1. She said a resident could be at risk of cross contamination. She said going forward she would conduct an in-service with the nursing staff to ensure they are cleaning equipment between uses. Record review of an undated facility policy titled Glucometer Cleaning Policy indicated, .1. Ensure glucometer is cleansed between each resident care. 2. Pre-moistened 10% bleach wipes or equivalent. The nurse will cleanse the glucometer with said bleach solution or equivalent after each use .
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0943 (Tag F0943)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the required annual Abuse training for 1 of 13 employees (ADON) reviewed for training. The facility failed to ensure Abuse training...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the required annual Abuse training for 1 of 13 employees (ADON) reviewed for training. The facility failed to ensure Abuse training was provided to the ADON. This failure could affect residents and place them at risk Abuse due to lack of staff training. Findings included: Record review of the personnel file for ADON indicated a hire date of 11/02/2020. There was no documentation of annual training on Abuse. During an interview on 6/21/2022 at 11:45 AM, the BOM said she had been employed at the facility for two years. She said she was responsible for the on boarding of new employees and annual training requirements at the facility. She said each department head was responsible for ensuring the employees in their departments received the required trainings. She said during the on boarding process of orientation she provided the new employees login in information for the online training program. She said their corporate department was responsible for loading the trainings into each employee's profile and it was automatically generated. She said she was not sure why some of the employees had not completed any of the annual trainings that were required before their anniversary. During an interview on 6/21/2022 at 2:00 PM, the Administrator said the ADON failed to complete her annual abuse training, but she would complete it today. She said the initial trainings for all staff during orientation and annually should include trainings on HIV, Dementia, Falls, Restraints, Abuse and Resident Rights. She said the BOM was responsible for setting up the initial trainings with login information and the department heads were responsible for ensuring completion of the trainings required on hire and annually. She said residents could be at risk of abuse and the resident rights not being respected. She said her expectation going forward would be to have all employees complete the required trainings per their policy before providing care on hire and annually. She said she would complete an audit along with the DON. Record review of an undated facility policy titled Competency of Nursing Staff, indicated, .1. All nursing staff must meet the specific competency requirements of their respective licensure and certification requirements defined by State law . 2. The facility will track, assess, plan, implement and evaluate effectiveness of training .
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0679 (Tag F0679)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide an ongoing program of activities designed to meet the inter...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide an ongoing program of activities designed to meet the interests and needs of each resident for 6 of 6 residents reviewed for activities (Resident #'s #31, #16, #34, #24, #37, and #33). The facility did not provide ongoing activities on days when activity director was not there. This failure could place residents at risk for psychosocial harm due to lack of social interaction and boredom. Findings included: During resident council meeting with 6 residents on 6/21/22 at 2:00pm, all residents stated that they would like more activity time. Residents complained that activity director had been being pulled for transportation, and then she was out sick. All residents stated that the only activity they got to do when she was gone was bingo. They stated they do not want to get rid of bingo but would like more activities to be offered. All residents stated that when she was not in the facility, bingo was the only thing anyone else would do with them. Record review of Resident #31's face sheet revealed that he was a [AGE] year-old male who was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia (confusion), hypotension (low blood pressure), tachycardia (fast heart rate), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (trouble breathing, lung disease). Record review of Resident #31's MDS dated [DATE] indicated that he had a BIMS score of 14. Record review of Resident #16's face sheet revealed that he was a [AGE] year-old male originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of vitamin D deficiency (low vitamin d levels), hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol), type 2 diabetes (high blood sugar), and cerebral palsy (congenital disorder of movement). Record review of Resident #16's MDS dated [DATE] indicated that he had a BIMS score of 7. Record review of Resident #34's face sheet revealed that she was a [AGE] year-old female originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Alzheimer's (dementia, confusion, memory problems) and type 2 diabetes (high blood sugar). Record review of Resident #34's MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 13. Record review of Resident #24's face sheet revealed that she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of depression, anxiety, and hypertension (high blood pressure). Record review of Resident #24's MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 11. Record review of Resident #37's face sheet revealed that he was a [AGE] year-old male originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and subsequently readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of cerebrovascular disease (condition affecting blood flow and blood vessels in the brain), hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol), bipolar disease (extreme mood swings), and anxiety disorder. Record review of Resident #37's MDS dated [DATE] revealed that he had a BIMS score of 11. Record review of Resident #33's face sheet revealed that he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of transient cerebral ischemic attack, cognitive communication deficit, hyperlipidemia, and gout. Record review of Resident #33's MDS dated [DATE] revealed that he had a BIMS score of 13. In an interview with Activity Director on 6/21/2022 at 2:44pm, she stated that she had been employed there for a little over a year. She stated that for the past month or so she was gone sometimes 3-5 days a week, sometimes all day long doing transportation. Activity directors stated that she had also been out sick for the last week and a half. Stated that Resident #33 had organized a [NAME] game for the weekends, because he and the residents enjoyed that. She stated that she is the only activity person employed and administration is responsible for activities when she is not available. She stated that she kept dominoes and card games out for residents to do when she was not there. Activity director stated that she could see that it could be a psychosocial issue for residents when activities are not offered. In an interview with Administrator and DON on 6/21/22 at 2:54pm they both stated that Activity Director was being used for transportation, due to the fact that they currently have no specific transportation aide. Administrator stated that they had recently began offering the residents a choice of activities, because the residents were refusing to participate in anything other than bingo. Stated they will work on a better variety. In an interview with DON on 6/22/22 at 9:29am, she stated that the Administrator was responsible for seeing that activities got done when the activity director was out. In an interview with Administrator on 6/22/22 at 9:41am, she stated that someone was normally designated to supervise activities when the activity director was out. She also stated that she was the one who was ultimately responsible for seeing that the activities were actually done. Record review of activity calendar dated May 2022 revealed that residents missed organized activities on 5/24 (Outside Social, Trivia & Coffee, Bingo, and Dance Off), 5/25 (Outside Social, Game Room Fun, & Movie with Friends), 5/26 (Outside Social, Resident Choice, Cookie & Juice, and In Room Visits), and 5/27 (Outside Social, Bingo, Resident Choice, Cookies & Juice) due to activity director being out. Bingo was held on 5/25 and 5/26, but no other planned activities went on as scheduled. Record review of activity calendar dated June 2022 revealed that organized activities were missed on 6/1 through 6/19 due to activity director being out. Activities missed included Game Room Fun, Karaoke and Coffee, Trivia and Coffee, Outside Socials, Resident Shopping, Cooking with [NAME], Flag Day craft and Story Time, Dance Away, Book Club, Father's Day Luncheon, and Snow Cone Sells. Record review on 6/22/2022 of policy titled Preparation for Activities dated June 2018 stated .Activities start on time as stated on the activities calendar. If an activity is delayed or cancelled an alternate, similar type of program is provided at the same time in place of the cancelled event .
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Drug Regimen Review (Tag F0756)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all irregularities identified by the licensed pharmacist were reported to the attending physician and acted upon in order to minimi...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all irregularities identified by the licensed pharmacist were reported to the attending physician and acted upon in order to minimize or prevent adverse consequences to the extent possible for 7 of 12 residents reviewed for medication record review. (Resident #s 5, 10, 17, 20, 35, 39 and 41) The facility failed to obtain consent for Antipsychotic or Neuroleptic medication treatment for all existing and new antipsychotic medication orders as directed by the pharmacy consultant's findings during medication regimen review conducted 01/28/22 for resident #'s 5,10,17,20, 35,39 and 41 This failure could place the residents being at risk for medication errors, unnecessary medications and incorrect administration. Findings included: Record Review of a Pharmacy Consultant Medication Regimen Review for Resident #5 dated 01/28/22 read as follows: .Issue Type: Texas Health and Human Services is requiring form 3713, consent for Antipsychotic or Neuroleptic medication Treatment for ALL existing and new antipsychotic medications orders, as of January 2022. This resident is receiving the following medications that require updated consent: Risperidone Record Review of a Pharmacy Consultant Medication Regimen Review for Resident #10 dated 01/28/22 read as follows: .Issue Type: Texas Health and Human Services is requiring form 3713, consent for Antipsychotic or Neuroleptic medication Treatment for ALL existing and new antipsychotic medications orders, as of January 2022. This resident is receiving the following medications that require updated consent: Risperdal Record Review of a Pharmacy Consultant Medication Regimen Review for Resident #17 dated 01/28/22 read as follows: .Issue Type: Texas Health and Human Services is requiring form 3713, consent for Antipsychotic or Neuroleptic medication Treatment for ALL existing and new antipsychotic medications orders, as of January 2022. This resident is receiving the following medications that require updated consent: Risperidone Record Review of a Pharmacy Consultant Medication Regimen Review for Resident #20 dated 01/28/22 read as follows: .Issue Type: Texas Health and Human Services is requiring form 3713, consent for Antipsychotic or Neuroleptic medication Treatment for ALL existing and new antipsychotic medications orders, as of January 2022. This resident is receiving the following medications that require updated consent: Risperidone Record Review of a Pharmacy Consultant Medication Regimen Review for Resident #41 dated 01/28/22 read as follows: .Issue Type: Texas Health and Human Services is requiring form 3713, consent for Antipsychotic or Neuroleptic medication Treatment for ALL existing and new antipsychotic medications orders, as of January 2022. This resident is receiving the following medications that require updated consent: Risperidone Record Review of a Pharmacy Consultant Medication Regimen Review for Resident #39 dated 01/28/22 read as follows: .Issue Type: Texas Health and Human Services is requiring form 3713, consent for Antipsychotic or Neuroleptic medication Treatment for ALL existing and new antipsychotic medications orders, as of January 2022. This resident is receiving the following medications that require updated consent: Quetiapine Record Review of a Pharmacy Consultant Medication Regimen Review for Resident #35 dated 01/28/22 read as follows: .Issue Type: Texas Health and Human Services is requiring form 3713, consent for Antipsychotic or Neuroleptic medication Treatment for ALL existing and new antipsychotic medications orders, as of January 2022. This resident is receiving the following medications that require updated consent: Quetiapine Record Review on 6/21/22 of miscellaneous scanned documents, progress notes and nurses notes in PCC the Electronic Medical Record for resident #'s 5, 10, 17, 20, 35, 39 and 41 did not contain any properly executed consent forms (Form 3713) by resident or resident representative for antipsychotic medication orders as directed to obtain by the pharmacy consultant on 01/28/22. During an interview and record review on 06/21/22 at 2:30 p.m., with the ADON, DON and Regional Nurse Consultant (RNC)the ADON said she was responsible for completion of the recommendation made by the pharmacist during MRR on 01/28/22. She said she had not executed the consents as required by the Pharmacy Consultant for medication review in January and placed them into the medical record as directed by the DON. The DON said she previously delegated obtaining the consents for residents #'s 5, 10, 17, 20, 35, 39 and 41 to the ADON and the consents should have been obtained within 7 days as required by their policy. The DON said that not obtaining consent put residents at risk of receiving unnecessary antipsychotic medications. The DON said some of the old consents for antipsychotic or neuroleptic medication treatment were in a binder in her office but should be scanned into the medical record as required by regulation and to maintain consistency in documentation. Review of the binder containing consent with the ADON, DON and RNC indicated there was no documentation that the Resident's #5, 10, 17, 20, 35, 39 and 41 or RP's had signed the form 3713 or a telephone consent was obtained from the RP within the required time frame of 7 days after written report was obtained by the facility. The executed consents were not correctly completed and scanned into the medical record as of exit date 06/23/22. Record review of an undated Policy for Drug Regimen Reviews read . The consultant Pharmacist shall review the drug regimen of each resident monthly 4. Should irregularities be found by the consultant pharmacist, he/she will provide the administrator with a written, signed and dated copy of the report within 3 business days, listing the irregularities found and recommendations for their solutions. 5. These irregularities identified in the medication regimen review will be acted upon within 7 days of receipt of the signed report. Any immediate action identified from the pharmacist during the review will be reported to the DON/designee immediately.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for food serv...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for food service safety. The facility did not ensure that milk in the milk cooler was not expired, and that frozen foods were thawed properly to prevent foodborne illness. This failure could place residents who ate food from the kitchen at risk of foodborne illness. Findings included: In an observation of the kitchen on 6/20/22 at 9:00am, 2 gallons of whole milk were observed in the milk cooler with an expiration date 6/15/2022. 1 gallon was unopened and, 1 gallon was 1/2 full. An observation and interview of kitchen on 6/21/22 at 11:00am revealed a large tube of hamburger meat sitting unsubmerged in dish sink, with no water running over it, not thawed, but starting to get slightly soft in places. Dietitian stated that it had just been placed there. In an interview with dietary aide on 6/21/22 at 1:50pm, he stated that he has been employed there for approximately 3 months. He stated that they normally thaw frozen meats by sitting them out in the sink. When asked if he saw any potential problems with this, he stated no ma'am. In an interview with Dietary Manager, on 6/21/22 at 3:11pm, she stated that she had been employed in this position since 4/16/22. She stated that if frozen foods were left to thaw at room temperatures, it could be an issue causing foodborne illnesses. In an interview with Administrator on 6/21/22 at 3:38pm, she stated that thawing frozen meat out at room temperature and having expired milk would be a problem because it can cause foodborne illnesses. She stated that the dietary manager was responsible for ensuring foods were thawed and stored in correct manner and was unsure how that was monitored. Record review of policy titled Food Preparation and Service dated December 2010 states .Foods will not be thawed at room temperature . Record review of police titled Food Storage dated October 2, 1018 with a revision date of June 1, 2019 stated no reference to discarding expired dairy items, but did state .all food will be stored according to the state, federal and US Food Codes and HACCP guidelines .
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0925 (Tag F0925)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program to keep one of one facility reviewed for pest control. The facility failed to ensu...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program to keep one of one facility reviewed for pest control. The facility failed to ensure an effective pest control program was in place to keep roaches out of the kitchen and the remainder of the facility. This failure could place residents at risk for exposure to ineffective pest control at the facility. Findings included: During an observation and interview on 6/21/22 at 11:00am of the kitchen revealed, a small brown bug was observed crawling on wall underneath wash sink. It crawled behind the baseboard, which was coming apart from wall. The Dietitian stated, they (pest control) just came the other day, and they(pest control) are supposed to come back today. Flies were observed flying in food preparation area. Dietary manager also interviewed at this time and stated that pest control would be back sometime today. Record review of pest control log on 6/21/22 revealed that pest control was last here on 5/23/2022 and treated the kitchen for flies and cockroaches in the dish area. Logs reveal that pest control was treating for pests twice per month, treating for flies and roaches. In an interview with Administrator on 6/21/22 at 3:38pm, she was informed of the findings in the kitchen. She stated that they were aware of the pest issue and they were working on trying to get it resolved. Pest control was coming twice monthly. Observation on 6/21/22 at 3:38pm revealed a large cockroach in Social workers office. Observation made on 6/22/22 at 9:57am revealed a tiny roach crawling across conference room table while surveyors working. In an interview on 6/22/22 at 10:00am with Ecolab (pest control company) consultant, he stated that with all the structural issues, baseboards coming off walls, and food debris, this issue has persisted. He stated that he treated A-hall dining area last night, and found that the door was left propped open, and that it was always left propped open when the smokers were outside. He stated that he had been treating this building for 7 years and this problem had been the same the entire 7 years. Record review on 6/22/2022 of policy titled Pest Control dated May 2008 stated .this facility maintains an on-going pest control program to ensure that the building is kept free of insects and rodents .
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
  • "What safeguards are in place to prevent abuse and neglect?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: Federal abuse finding, 8 life-threatening violation(s), 1 harm violation(s), $244,527 in fines. Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 34 deficiencies on record, including 8 critical (life-threatening) violations. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
  • • $244,527 in fines. Extremely high, among the most fined facilities in Texas. Major compliance failures.
  • • Grade F (0/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: This facility has a substantiated abuse finding. Extreme caution advised. Explore alternatives.

About This Facility

What is Wells Ltc Nursing & Rehabilitation's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns WELLS LTC NURSING & REHABILITATION an overall rating of 1 out of 5 stars, which is considered much below average nationally. Within Texas, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.

How is Wells Ltc Nursing & Rehabilitation Staffed?

CMS rates WELLS LTC NURSING & REHABILITATION's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 51%, compared to the Texas average of 46%.

What Have Inspectors Found at Wells Ltc Nursing & Rehabilitation?

State health inspectors documented 34 deficiencies at WELLS LTC NURSING & REHABILITATION during 2022 to 2025. These included: 8 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death), 1 that caused actual resident harm, 24 with potential for harm, and 1 minor or isolated issues. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.

Who Owns and Operates Wells Ltc Nursing & Rehabilitation?

WELLS LTC NURSING & REHABILITATION is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by GULF COAST LTC PARTNERS, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 90 certified beds and approximately 45 residents (about 50% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in WELLS, Texas.

How Does Wells Ltc Nursing & Rehabilitation Compare to Other Texas Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Texas, WELLS LTC NURSING & REHABILITATION's overall rating (1 stars) is below the state average of 2.8, staff turnover (51%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (2 stars) is below the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Wells Ltc Nursing & Rehabilitation?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "What safeguards and monitoring systems are in place to protect residents from abuse or neglect?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations and the substantiated abuse finding on record.

Is Wells Ltc Nursing & Rehabilitation Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, WELLS LTC NURSING & REHABILITATION has documented safety concerns. The facility has 1 substantiated abuse finding (meaning confirmed case of resident harm by staff or other residents). Inspectors have issued 8 Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 1-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Texas. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.

Do Nurses at Wells Ltc Nursing & Rehabilitation Stick Around?

WELLS LTC NURSING & REHABILITATION has a staff turnover rate of 51%, which is 5 percentage points above the Texas average of 46%. Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.

Was Wells Ltc Nursing & Rehabilitation Ever Fined?

WELLS LTC NURSING & REHABILITATION has been fined $244,527 across 7 penalty actions. This is 6.9x the Texas average of $35,524. Fines at this level are uncommon and typically indicate a pattern of serious deficiencies, repeated violations, or failure to correct problems promptly. CMS reserves penalties of this magnitude for facilities that pose significant, documented risk to resident health or safety. Families should request specific documentation of what issues led to these fines and what systemic changes have been implemented.

Is Wells Ltc Nursing & Rehabilitation on Any Federal Watch List?

WELLS LTC NURSING & REHABILITATION is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.