CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0552
(Tag F0552)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the right to be informed in advance, by the physician or oth...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the right to be informed in advance, by the physician or other practitioner or professional of the risks and benefits of proposed care, of treatment and treatment alternatives or treatment options and to choose the alternative or option her or she preferred for (Residents #23) 1 of 1 reviewed for resident rights.
The facility failed to inform, obtain consents, and explain to Resident #23 the risks and benefits of proposed care, plan of treatment and/or treatment alternatives or treatment options prior to administering an injection of Depo-Provera for the purpose to decrease his libido.
This failure could place residents at risk of being unable to exercise their rights to make informed decisions regarding their treatment.
Findings include:
Record review of Resident #23's face sheet, dated 03/25/2022, indicated a [AGE] year-old male, who was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: Traumatic Brain Injury (Trauma to the Brain), Other Sexual Dysfunction due to a substance or known physiological condition (Sexual Dysfunction from a cause that is known) and Pseudobulbar Affect (Episodes of inappropriate laughing or crying).
Record review of Resident #23's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/26/2022, revealed in Section B, Hearing, Speech, and Vision, Resident #23 was able to make himself understood and he had the ability to understand with clear comprehension. Section C revealed Resident #23 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, which indicated he was cognitively intact. Section G revealed Resident #23 required extensive assistance and 1-person physical assist with activities of daily living except for locomotion, dressing, personal hygiene, which is supervision or limited assist. Resident #23 required the use of a wheelchair for a mobility device. Section N revealed Resident #23 had not received any injections within the past 7 days. Section Q indicated Resident #23 participated in the assessment.
Record review of Resident #23's care plan revealed a care plan which addressed Resident #23's sexual behaviors were initiated on 10/25/2021, which revealed the following: Created date: 09/19/2019; Focus: Poor impulse control and has sexually inappropriate behaviors with staff. Goal: .The resident will verbalize understanding of need to control physically aggressive and sexual behaviors through the review date. Administer medication as order and document for side effects and effectiveness.
Record review of Resident #23's Physician order report, dated 05/11/2021, revealed the following orders: Start Date 05/11/2021, End Date Ongoing, for Depo-Provera (medroxyprogesterone) suspension; 150mg/mL; amount: 1mL; inject 1 applicator intramuscularly one time a day every 90 days related to other sexual dysfunction, ordered and electronically signed by [Physician A].
Record review of The Mayo Clinic website revealed, Depo-Provera is a well-known brand name for medroxyprogesterone acetate, a contraceptive injection that contains the hormone progestin. Depo-Provera is given as an injection every three months. Depo-Provera typically suppresses ovulation, keeping your ovaries from releasing an egg. It also thickens cervical mucus to keep sperm from reaching the egg. Accessed on 08/30/2021.
https://www.mayoclinic.org/tests-procedures/depo-provera/about/pac-20392204
Record review of The Federal Drug Administration (FDA), Depo-Provera is a progestin indicated only for the prevention of pregnancy .The recommended dose is 150mg of Depo-Provera every 3 months (13 weeks) administered by deep, intramuscular (IM) injection in the gluteal or deltoid muscle Accessed on 08/30/2021.
https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2015/020246s054,021583s026lbl.pdf
In an interview on 03/24/2021 at 11:30 AM, with Resident #23 revealed the resident was alert and oriented. He sat in his bed on his phone. State Surveyor explained the medication usage and side effects to him. He replied he did not want to take something like that. The State Surveyor informed him it was a medication that had already been administered. He said again he would not consent to it. The resident stated he understood what the State Surveyor asked and, he could tell people yes or no if he needed to.
In an interview on 03/24/2022 at 11:10 AM, the DON said the facility received a verbal consent for Depo Provera from Resident #23's from a Family Member. She said that was who they received all the consents for Resident #23. She said he did not have a Medical Power of Attorney. She said they did not get consents for any type of treatments, medications, or care planning from Resident #23, they only received consents from the Family Member. The DON said she did not ask the resident or inform him of what he was taking, and she believed she did not have to get a consent for this type of medication.
In an interview on 03/24/2022 at 2:20 PM, the Social Worker said she got all consents from the Family Member concerning Resident #23. She stated there was not a Medical Power of Attorney and she had spoken with the Family Member about the Medical Power of Attorney or Guardianship. She said the Family Member was unable to get Guardianship due to the financial cost of it. She said, the resident had not had a competency evaluation, but she felt like he could not make decisions on his own due to his diagnosis, even with a BIMS score of 12.
In an interview on 03/25/2022 at 10:00 AM, the DON said they had not tried any non-pharmacological interventions for Resident #23 prior to receiving the orders for the Depo-Provera Injection. She said, the resident's medical doctor had not completed a competency evaluation on the resident, but they were going to get that done. The DON said her understanding with administering the Depo-Provera shot to male residents was, it would lower the testosterone levels which would lower their sex drive. The DON said Resident #23 had not ever been informed of the treatment plan for the Depo-Provera.
In an interview on 03/25/2021 at 2:25 PM, the Family Member for Resident #23 indicated she did not have medical power of attorney for Resident #23, but the facility allowed her to bypass the resident and for her to make medical decisions for him. The Family Member said that he had not been informed that Depo Provera had a black box warning, nor had she been informed of the potential side effects. After listing the side effects to her, she said that she would not have consented for the medication and she knew the resident would not have either. She revoked her previous verbal consent the facility allowed her to give. She said she would notify the facility after the call that she had revoked her verbal consent.
In an interview on 03/25/2021 at 4:24 PM, Physician A said, he treated Resident #23 for behaviors, which included sexual behaviors. He said he had given a verbal order in May of 2021 for Depo Provera given every 3 months to help with this. He said the order was only a one-time order and it should have been given along with initiation of psych services. He said he would have never of ordered Depo Provera for long term usage, as it was meant to be for short term usage. He was unsure why it was still given up to this date, but he would be following up with the facility. He stated, Depo Provera inhibited them from sexual behaviors. The benefit from Depo Provera was it only targeted the sexuality component, but it was meant to work in conjunction with therapy.
Record review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Rights dated and revised 04/2017, documented [in-part]: Facilities shall have a written policy on resident rights and shall post and distribute a copy of those rights. In addition to the basic civil and legal rights enjoys by other adults, residents shall have the rights listed below. Facility policies and procedures must be in compliance with these rights. Residents shall: Participate, and have family participate, if desired, in the planning of activities and service. Receive care and services that are adequate, appropriate, and in compliance with contractual terms of residency, relevant federal and state laws, rules, and regulations and shall include the right to refuse such care and services. Be free from mental, emotional, and physical abuse and neglect, from chemical or physical restraints, and from financial exploitation and from financial exploitation and misappropriation of property.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0561
(Tag F0561)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to make choices abou...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to make choices about aspects of his or her life in the facility that were significant to the resident for (Resident #23) 1 of 1 reviewed for self-determination.
The facility failed to ensure Resident #23 was treated as his own responsible party which pertained to medical services and consents.
This deficient practice could place residents who were competent to make their own decisions by contributing to poor self-esteem, lack of information, and unmet needs.
The findings were:
Record review of Resident #23's face sheet, dated 03/25/2022, indicated a [AGE] year-old male, who was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: Traumatic Brain Injury (Trauma to the Brain), Other Sexual Dysfunction due to a substance or known physiological condition (Sexual Dysfunction from a cause that is known) and Pseudobulbar Affect (Episodes of inappropriate laughing or crying).
He was documented as being his own responsible party. The face sheet did not reflect a Medical Power of Attorney.
Record review of Resident #23's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/26/2022, revealed in Section B, Hearing, Speech, and Vision, Resident #23 was able to make himself understood and he had the ability to understand with clear comprehension. Section C revealed Resident #23 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, which indicated he was cognitively intact. Section G revealed Resident #23 required extensive assistance and 1-person physical assist with activities of daily living except for locomotion, dressing, personal hygiene, which is supervision or limited assist. Resident #23 required the use of a wheelchair for a mobility device. Section N revealed Resident #23 had not received any injections within the past 7 days. Section Q indicated Resident #23 participated in the assessment.
In an interview on 03/24/2021 at 11:30 AM with Resident #23 revealed the resident, was alert and oriented. He sat in his bed on his phone. He said that he could tell people yes or no if he needed to.
In an interview on 03/24/2022 at 11:10 AM, the DON said, they had received a verbal consent for Depo Provera from the residents Family Member. She said that was who they received all the consents for Resident #23. She said he did not have a Medical Power of Attorney. She said they did not get consents for any type of treatments, medications, or care planning from Resident #23, they only received consents from Family Member. She said she did not ask the resident of inform him of what he took, and she believed she did not have to even get a consent for the Depo Provera medication. The facility asked the Family Member for consent because they felt the resident was unable to give consent due to his diagnosis.
In an interview on 03/24/2022 at 2:20 PM, the Social Worker said she got all consents from the Family Member concerning Resident #23. She stated there was not a Medical Power of Attorney and she had spoken with the Family Member about a Medical Power of Attorney or Guardianship. She said the Family Member was unable to get Guardianship due to the financial cost. She said she felt like Resident #23 could not make decisions on his own due to his diagnosis, even with a BIMS score of 12. She said the resident was legally his own responsible party.
In an interview on 03/25/2021 at 2:25 PM, the Family Member indicated she did not have medical power of attorney for Resident #23 but the facility allowed her to bypass the resident and for her to make medical decisions for him
Record review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Rights dated and revised 04/2017, documented [in-part]: Facilities shall have a written policy on resident rights and shall post and distribute a copy of those rights. In addition to the basic civil and legal rights enjoys by other adults, residents shall have the rights listed below. Facility policies and procedures must be in compliance with these rights. Residents shall: Participate, and have family participate, if desired, in the planning of activities and service. Receive care and services that are adequate, appropriate, and in compliance with contractual terms of residency, relevant federal and state laws, rules, and regulations and shall include the right to refuse such care and services: Be free from mental, emotional, and physical abuse and neglect, from chemical or physical restraints, and from financial exploitation and from financial exploitation and misappropriation of property.
Record review of the facility's Advanced Directives policy (last revised 12/16) revealed Advanced Directives will be respected in accordance with state law and facility policy. Upon admission, the resident will be provided with written information concerning the right to refuse or accept medical or surgical treatments and to formulate an advance directive if he or she chooses to do so. If the resident indicated that he or she has not established advance directives, the facility staff will offer assistance in establishing advance directives. The resident will be given an option to accept or decline the assistance, and care will be contingent on either decision. Nursing staff will document in the medical record the offer to assist and the resident's decision to accept or decline assistance. The resident has the right to refuse treatment, whether or not he or she has an advance directive. A resident will not be treated against his or her own wishes. Residents who refuse treatment will not be transferred to another facility unless other criteria for transfer are met. - Durable Power of Attorney for Health Care (Medical power of Attorney)- a document delegating authority to a legal representative to make health care decisions in case the individual delegating the authority subsequently becomes incapacitated.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Notification of Changes
(Tag F0580)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to immediately inform the resident, consult with the resi...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to immediately inform the resident, consult with the resident's physician and notify consistent with his or her authority, the resident representative when there was an accident which involved the resident which resulted in injury and had the potential for requiring physician intervention for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #43) reviewed for notification of changes.
The facility failed to ensure Resident #43's physician and family representative were notified after the resident had a fall and seizure on 03/18/22.
This failure could place residents at risk for a delay in treatment, excessive pain, and a decline in health status.
The findings include:
Record review of Resident #43's admission Record (face sheet), printed 03/25/22, revealed a [AGE] year-old female who was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident had diagnoses which included: other seizures (principal dx); hypokalemia; mental disorder; cerebral palsy; essential hypertension; bacterial pneumonia; acute respiratory failure with hypoxia; sepsis; moderate protein-calorie malnutrition; major depressive disorder, recurrent, moderate; and aphasia, unsteadiness on feet and other lack of coordination were added on 02/17/22 and history of falling was added on 02/20/22. The form documented Resident #43 was her own responsible party and listed her sister as her emergency contact and resident representative.
Record review of Resident #43's Nursing Progress Notes revealed the following [in part]:
- 03/19/22 at 12:43 PM, LVN F documented the resident remained in bed, was lethargic and agitated, and was assisted by staff with meals.
- 03/20/22 at 10:43 AM, LVN F documented resident in bed and not able to ambulate since Friday 3/18/22 following a series of multiple small seizures. Physician notified.
- 03/20/22 at 12:46 PM, the ADON documented resident's family visited, and sister got resident up and dressed that morning. Resident was seated in wheelchair at the nurses' station with a snack.
- 03/20/22 at 3:29 PM, LVN F documented family visiting and observed resident's decline since Friday 3/18/22; sister requested resident's long-time neurologist be called.
- 03/21/22 at 11:17 AM, LVN G documented resident was in bed and complained of pain in bilateral hips/legs. Physician was notified and gave order for x-ray bilateral hip/femur.
- 03/21/22 at 1:20 PM, LVN G documented x-ray result showed fracture to left hip. Physician notified and advised to send resident to emergency room via ambulance. Sister was notified. Resident was transported to hospital via stretcher by ambulance.
Record review of the Social Services Progress Note, dated 03/22/22, revealed a documented late entry for 03/21/22. The note documented the Social Worker received a call from Resident #43's sister, who wanted to know why she was not notified about the resident's seizure on Friday 03/18/22. The Social Worker documented she conveyed the sister's concerns to the Administrator and DON.
Observation on 3/24/22 at 8:57 AM, during a visit to Resident #43 at the hospital, revealed she laid in bed with the head of the bed elevated, four 1/2 side rails were raised with the side rails padded at the head of the bed and pillows positioned next to her left side/hip. Resident #43 was awake and alert and briefly made eye contact when her name was spoken. She was not interviewable. Her only verbal response to attempts made to interview her was, I hurt, I hurt, I hurt, I hurt. She did not say where she hurt.
In an interview on 03/22/22 at 11:13 AM, the DON stated Resident #43 had been discharged to the hospital on [DATE]. The DON stated the resident was ambulatory and she had a seizure while walking, fell, and fractured her left hip.
In an interview on 03/25/22 at 3:05 PM, the Social Worker stated she had not found documentation in Resident #43's electronic health record regarding notification of the resident's sister on 03/18/22 after the resident fell and had seizure activity.
In a telephone interview on 03/25/22 at 4:20 PM, LVN D stated she worked the night shift, 6 PM - 6 AM, and had worked the night of Friday 03/18/22. The LVN stated Resident #43 fell during the shift change on 03/18/22 at 5:45 PM. She stated the resident came out of the dining room, staggered, and put her arm behind her and grabbed the handrail in the hallway. The resident slid down and landed on her hip on the floor in Hall D. She stated the resident did not hit her head, but she started having a seizure. The LVN stated she ran to assist the resident and the day shift nurse came to help her. LVN D stated she tried to get the resident's vital signs, but she was combative and was swung her arms, kicked her legs, and screamed help me, help me. LVN D stated they were able to take Resident #43 to the closest empty room on Hall D and gave her a PRN rectal Valium suppository for her seizures. She stated the resident had an order for the PRN Valium suppository. LVN D stated there was no indication Resident #43 was in pain, and she rolled back and forth on the bed. LVN D stated, she did not notify anyone and did not call the residents sister regarding the residents fall and seizure. LVN D stated I dropped the ball. I should have called and notified the DON, the doctor, and the sister. LVN D stated she had a lot to learn about incident reporting.
Record review of the facility's policy and procedure for Change of Condition and Physician/Family Notification, dated as Revised 8/11/2020 and 3/25/2021, revealed the following [in part]:
Purpose
To ensure that resident's family and/or legal representative and physician are notified of resident changes that fall under the following categories:
- An accident resulting in injury that has the potential for needed physician intervention.
- A significant change in the resident's physical, mental or psychosocial status. (See below for examples.)
- A need to significantly alter treatment.
- Transfer of the resident from the facility.
Procedure
When any of the above situations exists, the licensed nurse will contact the resident's family and their physician.
Calls will be made to the family until they are reached. A message may be left on an answering machine which does not give specifics but lease a request for the facility to be called.
The physician will be called immediately for any emergencies irrespective of the time of day.
Non-emergency notifications may be made the next morning if the situation occurs on the late evening or night shift. This applies to any day of the week including holidays .
Each attempt will be charted as to time the call was made, who was spoken to, and what information was given to the physician
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0688
(Tag F0688)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident with limited range of motion and /or...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident with limited range of motion and /or to prevent further decrease in range of motion (ROM) for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #27) reviewed for contractures.
The facility failed to ensure Resident #27's splint was placed on her right hand to prevent a future decline in ROM.
This failure could place residents with contractures at risk for further decline in ROM and development of multiple contractures.
Findings include:
Record review of Resident #27's face sheet, dated 03/25/22, revealed Resident #27 was a [AGE] year-old female with an initial admission date of 06/26/20 and a readmission date of 08/12/21. Resident #27 had diagnoses which included: Strain of Other Specified Muscles, Fascia (tissue surrounding muscle) and Tendons of Wrist and Left hand, dated 12/13/21 (Principal Diagnoses), Muscle Wasting and Atrophy (degeneration), dated 10/22/21 (Secondary Diagnosis) Chronic Pain Syndrome, dated 06/26/20, Pain Right Knee, dated 08/26/20, Pain Left Knee, dated 08/26/20. Unspecified osteoarthritis, and Schizoaffective Disorder, Bipolar Type, dated 06/26/20.
Record review of Resident #27's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], revealed a BIM's score of 12 which indicated mild cognitive impairment. Section G: Functional Limitation in Range of Motion indicated Resident #27 had no upper extremity impairment and no lower extremity impairment on either side.
Record review of Resident #27's Consolidated Physician Orders (current as of 0003/24/22 revealed the resident had no orders to apply a splint or any type of orthotic device to her left hand (fingers and wrist) contractures.
Record review of Resident #27's Care Plan, dated revised 02/04/22, revealed the resident was to receive gentle range of motion with dressing, Monitor/document/report a worsening of contractures. There was no intervention for a splint or orthotic device documented.
Observation and interview on 03/23/22 at 09:52 AM revealed t Resident #27 had contractures to her right hand and fingers. There was a splint observed on the chest of drawers in her room. She stated it was a splint for her right hand and was told by the therapy department to wear it at night. She stated her boyfriend, Resident #13, applied it each night and it was not applied by the nurses. She stated she would take it off during the night if her hand hurt, but she wore it part of each night.
In an interview with Resident #13 on 03/23/22 at 10:00 AM, he stated he applied the splint to Resident #27's right hand every night. He stated the therapy department got her the splint and she was supposed to wear it on her right hand at night because of her contracture.
Interview with CNA E on 03/23/22 at 1:50 PM revealed she worked at the facility part time. She stated Resident #27 was not wearing her splint at this time. She stated she put it on when the resident wanted to wear it, but she could not remember the last time she put the splint on Resident #27. Further interview revealed the CNA didn't know when the splint was supposed to be worn. She stated she would ask the nurses if the resident should wear a Splint.
Interview with the DON on 03/23/22 at 10:15 AM, she stated she was not aware of Resident #27's contractures to her right hand or she had a splint in her room. She reviewed the residents orders as of 3/23/22 and confirmed there was no order written for the orthotic splint. She stated it would be therapy's responsibility to obtain orders and to apply the splint. She stated staff should follow orders for Resident #27 and resident should have an order in her EMR if she had a splint. She stated Resident #13 should not be the one to apply Resident #27's splint. She stated there should be an order, it should be care planned and available to all staff (which included CNA's) in the EMR in order for nursing to apply the splint. She stated it was the MDS Coordinators responsibility to ensure the care plan meeting was held and the care plan was updated . She stated it was the MDS coordinator's responsibility to monitor for any new orders requiring an update to the care plan. She also stated it was the charge nurse's responsibility to monitor the orders and care plans to ensure physician orders were followed when they were received. She stated the splint was not applied by nursing because the order was not communicated to nursing by the occupational therapists by written and verbal communication.
Interview with the Occupational Therapy Assistant on 03/24/22 at 9:45 AM with the COTA revealed Resident #27 was discharged from therapy on 02/18/22 after her therapy goals had been met. The COTA stated Resident #27 should be wearing her splint at night. She stated there was not an order written by therapy to communicate the physician's orders to nursing at the time she acquired the splint. She stated there was a communication breakdown between nursing and therapy due to the order not being written. She stated this could result in the resident not receiving needed care and services needed
Record review of the facility policy and procedure titled Resident Mobility and Range of Motion, dated revised July 2017, documented [in-part]: Residents with limited range of motion will receive treatment and services to increase and/or prevent further decline in range of motions. Residents with limited mobility will receive appropriate services equipment and assistance to maintain/or improve mobility unless reduction in mobility is unavoidable.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who needed respiratory care, which i...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who needed respiratory care, which included tracheostomy care and tracheal suctioning, was provided consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, the residents' goals and preferences for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #45) reviewed for oxygen administration.
The facility failed to ensure Residents #45's nasal cannula, the humidifier bottles and nasal cannula tubing were out of date and not changed as ordered.
This failure could place residents at risk for respiratory infection due to the potential for microorganisms infiltrating their oxygen equipment and supplies, and compromised health status from receiving treatments and procedures not ordered by a physician.
The findings included:
Resident review of Resident #45's admission Record , printed 03/25/2022, revealed a [AGE] year-old male who had been admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #45 had diagnoses which included: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (Chronic Inflammatory Lung Disease), Acute and Chronic Respiratory Failure (Short- and Long-term Respiratory Failure) with Hypercapnia (elevated carbon dioxide levels in the blood), Atherosclerotic Heart Disease (Disease of the heart due to plaque buildup in the arteries), Morbid Obesity and Hypertension.
Record review of Resident #45's active orders, printed 03/25/2022, revealed an order dated 12/14/2021 for oxygen at 2 liters per minute via nasal cannula to keep O2 saturations greater than 90% every shift. An order, dated 01/18/2022, revealed the oxygen tubing be changed weekly, every Sunday.
Record review of Resident #45's Treatment Administration Record for 03/25/2022 revealed there was no documentation that the humidifier bottle or tubing was scheduled to be changed weekly.
Observation on 03/22/2022 at 9:55 AM revealed Resident #45 laid in bed watching his television. His respirations were even and non-labored. The nasal cannula tubing for the oxygen administration was dated for 03/13/2022.
Observation and interview on 03/22/2022 at 2:58 PM revealed the ADON walked down to Resident #45's room to verify the date on the O2 tubing. The ADON said she delegated it to whichever LVN working Sunday nights . She looked and noted the date was 03/13/2022 and it was not changed according to their policy and procedures , which was weekly. She got new tubing and changed the tubing and dated it with 03/22/2022 while we were in the room. She said the nurses must have gotten busy and forgot to change it. She said she goes through the facility on Mondays to verify it has been completed. She must have missed the resident. The LVNs that were working on Sunday were unavailable to interview.
In an interview on 03/25/2022 at 9:57 AM, the DON stated Resident #45's oxygen tubing should have been changed out on 03/20/2022. She stated she delegated the task to the ADON who oversaw it was changed out weekly on Sundays. She said it was ordered to be changed every Sunday and the ADON was responsible for this task . She said that it should have been changed the previous Sunday per the policy and procedure.
Record review of the facilities policy titled Oxygen Administration, dated revised October 2010, revealed [in part]: To verify that there is a physician's order for this procedure. Review the physicians order or facilities protocol for oxygen administration.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0740
(Tag F0740)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure each resident received and the facility provided the necess...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure each resident received and the facility provided the necessary behavioral health care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, in accordance with the comprehensive assessment and plan of care for Resident #23 reviewed for behavioral health services.
The facility failed ensure Resident #23, who was diagnosed with Bipolar Disorder, Schizophrenia, Anxiety and Depression received the care and services needed in the most appropriate setting, after the resident began to display anxious and depressive behaviors.
This failure could place residents at risk for their mental and psychosocial needs not being met.
The findings included:
Record review of Resident #23's face sheet, dated 03/25/2022, indicated a [AGE] year-old male, who was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: Traumatic Brain Injury (Trauma to the Brain), Other Sexual Dysfunction due to a substance or known physiological condition (Sexual Dysfunction from a cause that is known) and Pseudobulbar Affect (Episodes of inappropriate laughing or crying).
Record review of Resident's #23's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/22/2021, revealed in Section A the resident was not PASRR positive with a level 2 for mental illness, Developmental Disability or Intellectual disability. Section B, hearing, Speech, and Vision, Resident #23's was able to make himself understood and he had the ability to understand with clear comprehension. Section C revealed Resident #23 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 08, which indicated he had moderately impaired cognition. Section I revealed active diagnosis for Malnutrition, Depression, Bipolar Disorder, other Sexual Dysfunction, and Schizophrenia. Section N revealed Resident #23 had not received any injections within the past 7 days but had received Antipsychotics, and Antidepressants for the last 7 days. Section Q indicated that Resident #23 participated in the assessment.
Record review of Resident #23's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/26/2022, revealed Section B, hearing, Speech, and Vision, Resident #23's was able to make himself understood and he had the ability to understand with clear comprehension. Section C revealed Resident #23 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, which indicated he was cognitively intact. Section G revealed that Resident #23 required extensive assistance and 1-person physical assist with activities of daily living except for locomotion, dressing, personal hygiene, which is supervision or limited assist. Resident #23 required the use of a wheelchair for a mobility device. Section N revealed that Resident #23 had not received any injections within the past 7 days but had received Antipsychotics, and Antidepressants for the last 7 days. Section Q indicated that Resident #23 participated in the assessment.
Record review of Resident #23's Care Plan did not reflect a need for psychiatric or psychological services. The care plan reflected: Resident #23's sexual behaviors were initiated on 10/25/2021, which revealed the following: Created date: 09/19/2019; Focus: Poor impulse control and has sexually inappropriate behaviors with staff. Goal: The resident will verbalize understanding of need to control physically aggressive and sexual behaviors through the review date. Administer medication as order and document for side effects and effectiveness. Focus: The resident has verbally been aggressive to staff and other residents related to Dementia, ineffective coping skills, poor impulse control. Goal is for the resident to have fewer than 3 episodes per week of verbal behavior. Focus: The resident is/has potential to be physically aggressive running his wheelchair to staffs and other residents related to Anger, Dementia, Poor impulse control and has sexually inappropriate behaviors towards staff. Goal is the resident will verbalize understanding of need to control physically aggressive and sexual behaviors. Focus: The resident uses psychotropic medications Abilify related to Behavior management; Administer Depakote as ordered.
Record review of Resident #23's clinical records did not reflect any behavioral health care visits or progress notes.
Record review of Resident #23's orders for 03/25/22 revealed medication orders for the following:-
-Abilify 20 MG, Give 1 tablet by mouth in the morning for Major Depressive Disorder, recurrent.
-Carbamazepine tablet 200 MG, Give 1 tablet by mouth 2 times a day for Bipolar Disorder.
-Depakote Extended Release tablet 24-hour 500 MG, Give 1 tablet by mouth 2 times a day related to Bipolar Disorder.
-Dextromethorphan-quinidine capsule 20-10 MG, Give 1 capsule by mouth 2 times a day related to Pseudobulbar Affect.
-Trazadone tablet 100 MG, Give 1 tablet by mouth in the evening related to insomnia.
Record review of Resident #23's orders showed a psychiatric evaluation for psychiatric services was not entered until 03/24/22.
Record review of Resident #23's orders showed a phone order for an evaluation of capacity for psychiatric/neurological services related to Mood Disorder for 60 days, was not entered until 03/24/2022.
Record review of Resident #23's Nursing progress notes revealed the following:
- On 10/05/2021 at 9:12 AM revealed: At this time CNA made the nurse aware that resident was becoming physically aggressive in the shower. Resident requested lotion so she could watch him masturbate. CNA attempted to make resident aware that we are here to shower and that I am not going to watch you do that. He stated then Fuck you Bitch and proceeded to scream and yell and curse at her. Unable to put a plan in place due to resident not being willing or able to follow a plan.
- On 12/21/2021 at 8:56 PM revealed: Saw resident going down C hall attempting to go to another resident's room asking for a dip. When tried to redirect resident became angry cursing and flipping finger to the nurse and another staff member. Also tried to hit the staff with his wheelchair.
- On 12/26/2021 at 9:20 AM revealed: The resident saturated in urine refusing pericare from staff assisting the resident to get changed and dry. Continues to yell and curse at staff yelling he wants his dip motherfucking now. The resident finally after several attempts went to his room and changed his clothes refusing assistance. The resident then returned to the nurse's station yelling bitches and [NAME] at staff. Attempted to redirect the resident he stopped yelling and started flipping off the staff. The resident then went in his room and remained in his room until after breakfast. The resident then given his dip at 9 AM however the resident has now spilt half of his dip on the floor stating he wants more, speaking with a mouthful of dip at this time.
- On 12/26/2021 at 10:38 AM revealed: The resident called the facility phone laughing stating that he shit on himself and needed someone to come clean him up. The resident then sat on the toilet and pulled the emergency call light. Upon observation the resident had feces all over the wheelchair, he stated he pulled his pants down and had a bowel movement in his wheelchair the resident then had feces spread from the w/c to floor to the toilet seat. The resident then began yelling at staff attempting to assist the resident when he threw his t-shirt that he had wiped the feces in at staff. The resident was heard at nurse's station cursing at staff.
- On 01/06/2022 at 3:55 PM revealed: Resident propels self around via wheelchair targeting different nurses requesting chewing tobacco. Becomes upset and begins yelling when nurses tell him it's not time.
- On 01/23/2022 at 1:59 PM revealed: The resident has been very noncompliant thus far this shift.
-On 03/23/2022 at 4:59 PM revealed: Resident has an incorrect screen code of intellectual illness. Resident has a screen code of Mental illness.
- On 03/24/2022 at 11:45 AM revealed: At approximately 8:00 AM Medication Aide A reported to me that Resident was seated in his wheelchair in the doorway of his room with his door open. He has his penis out of his pants and was fondling himself.
- On 03/25/2022 at 11:18 AM revealed: Spoke with Staff Member A from the local PASRR authorities in regard to resident and positive PASSAR, appointment scheduled on 03/30/2022 at 8 AM. Resident notified of appointment and time.
Interview on 03/23/2022 at 2:40 PM with the MDS coordinator, she was unaware Resident #23's received a citation from last year's annual survey due to his behavior, but she felt like his behaviors had been corrected. She said she had never conducted an IDT meeting to facilitate treatment for the resident's behavioral issues .
In an interview on 03/25/2022 at 10:00 AM, the DON said they had not tried any non-pharmacological interventions for Resident #23. She said the Medical Doctor had not done any competency evaluations on the resident, but they were going to get one done. The DON said they had not submitted a previous request for Mental Health Services because they felt that it would not be effective. She said Resident #23 has had ongoing behaviors that have been directed towards others which included sexual, physical, and verbal aggression. She said she put an order in for a Psych evaluation and PASRR has since been contacted and will be out to the facility next week to see the resident and provide services to him .
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0742
(Tag F0742)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record reviews, facility failed to ensure resident who was diagnosed with a mental illness or psychosocia...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record reviews, facility failed to ensure resident who was diagnosed with a mental illness or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who had a history of trauma and / or post-traumatic stress disorder, received appropriate treatment and services to correct the assessed problem or to attain the highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being for (Resident #23 ) 1 of 1 resident reviewed.
The facility failed to ensure Resident #23, who was diagnosed with bipolar disorder, Schizophrenia, Depression and Anxiety received the care and services needed in the most appropriate setting, after the resident began to display verbally and physically aggressive behaviors.
This failure could place residents at risk for their mental and psychosocial needs not being met.
The findings included:
Record review of Resident #23's face sheet, dated 03/25/2022, indicated a [AGE] year-old male, who was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: Traumatic Brain Injury (Trauma to the Brain), Other Sexual Dysfunction due to a substance or known physiological condition (Sexual Dysfunction from a cause that is known) and Pseudobulbar Affect (Episodes of inappropriate laughing or crying).
Record review of Resident #23's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/26/2022, revealed in Section B, Hearing, Speech, and Vision, Resident #23 was able to make himself understood and he had the ability to understand with clear comprehension. Section C revealed Resident #23 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, which indicated he was cognitively intact. Section G revealed Resident #23 required extensive assistance and 1-person physical assist with activities of daily living except for locomotion, dressing, personal hygiene, which is supervision or limited assist. Resident #23 required the use of a wheelchair for a mobility device. Section N revealed Resident #23 had not received any injections within the past 7 days. Section Q indicated Resident #23 participated in the assessment.
Record review of Resident #23's Care Plan did not reflect a need for psychiatric or psychological services. The care plan reflected: Resident #23's sexual behaviors were initiated on 10/25/2021, which revealed the following: Created date: 09/19/2019; Focus: Poor impulse control and has sexually inappropriate behaviors with staff. Goal: The resident will verbalize understanding of need to control physically aggressive and sexual behaviors through the review date. Administer medication as order and document for side effects and effectiveness. Focus: The resident has verbally been aggressive to staff and other residents related to Dementia, ineffective coping skills, poor impulse control. Goal is for the resident to have fewer than 3 episodes per week of verbal behavior. Focus: The resident is/has potential to be physically aggressive running his wheelchair to staffs and other residents related to Anger, Dementia, Poor impulse control and has sexually inappropriate behaviors towards staff. Goal is the resident will verbalize understanding of need to control physically aggressive and sexual behaviors. Focus: The resident uses psychotropic medications Abilify related to Behavior management; Administer Depakote as ordered.
Record review of Resident #23's clinical records did not reflect any behavioral health care visits or progress notes.
Record review of Resident #23's orders for 03/25/22 revealed medication orders for the following:-
-Abilify 20 MG, Give 1 tablet by mouth in the morning for Major Depressive Disorder, recurrent.
-Carbamazepine tablet 200 MG, Give 1 tablet by mouth 2 times a day for Bipolar Disorder.
-Depakote Extended Release tablet 24-hour 500 MG, Give 1 tablet by mouth 2 times a day related to Bipolar Disorder.
-Dextromethorphan-quinidine capsule 20-10 MG, Give 1 capsule by mouth 2 times a day related to Pseudobulbar Affect.
-Trazadone tablet 100 MG, Give 1 tablet by mouth in the evening related to insomnia.
Record review of Resident #23's orders showed a psychiatric evaluation for psychiatric services was not entered until 03/24/22.
Record review of Resident #23's orders showed a phone order for an evaluation of capacity for psychiatric/neurological services related to Mood Disorder for 60 days, was not entered until 03/24/2022.
Record review of Resident #23's Nursing progress notes revealed the following:
- On 10/05/2021 at 9:12 AM revealed: At this time CNA made the nurse aware that resident was becoming physically aggressive in the shower. Resident requested lotion so she could watch him masturbate. CNA attempted to make resident aware that we are here to shower and that I am not going to watch you do that. He stated then Fuck you Bitch and proceeded to scream and yell and curse at her. Unable to put a plan in place due to resident not being willing or able to follow a plan.
- On 12/21/2021 at 8:56 PM revealed: Saw resident going down C hall attempting to go to another resident's room asking for a dip. When tried to redirect resident became angry cursing and flipping finger to the nurse and another staff member. Also tried to hit the staff with his wheelchair.
- On 12/26/2021 at 9:20 AM revealed: The resident saturated in urine refusing pericare from staff assisting the resident to get changed and dry. Continues to yell and curse at staff yelling he wants his dip motherfucking now. The resident finally after several attempts went to his room and changed his clothes refusing assistance. The resident then returned to the nurse's station yelling bitches and [NAME] at staff. Attempted to redirect the resident he stopped yelling and started flipping off the staff. The resident then went in his room and remained in his room until after breakfast. The resident then given his dip at 9 AM however the resident has now spilt half of his dip on the floor stating he wants more, speaking with a mouthful of dip at this time.
- On 12/26/2021 at 10:38 AM revealed: The resident called the facility phone laughing stating that he shit on himself and needed someone to come clean him up. The resident then sat on the toilet and pulled the emergency call light. Upon observation the resident had feces all over the wheelchair, he stated he pulled his pants down and had a bowel movement in his wheelchair the resident then had feces spread from the w/c to floor to the toilet seat. The resident then began yelling at staff attempting to assist the resident when he threw his t-shirt that he had wiped the feces in at staff. The resident was heard at nurse's station cursing at staff.
- On 01/06/2022 at 3:55 PM revealed: Resident propels self around via wheelchair targeting different nurses requesting chewing tobacco. Becomes upset and begins yelling when nurses tell him it's not time.
- On 01/23/2022 at 1:59 PM revealed: The resident has been very noncompliant thus far this shift.
-On 03/23/2022 at 4:59 PM revealed: Resident has an incorrect screen code of intellectual illness. Resident has a screen code of Mental illness.
- On 03/24/2022 at 11:45 AM revealed: At approximately 8:00 AM Medication Aide A reported to me that Resident was seated in his wheelchair in the doorway of his room with his door open. He has his penis out of his pants and was fondling himself.
- On 03/25/2022 at 11:18 AM revealed: Spoke with Staff Member A from the local PASRR authorities in regard to resident and positive PASSAR, appointment scheduled on 03/30/2022 at 8 AM. Resident notified of appointment and time.
Interview on 03/23/2022 at 2:40 PM with the MDS coordinator she said, the resident should have been receiving PASRR services to address his Intellectual Disability and his Mental Illness, but she was unsure how to initiate services. When asked if she had ever contacted PASRR concerning this resident, she said that she had not. I asked her if she felt the resident's behavior was an issue. She said that it was but that she did not code it on the MDS because the medications were working. She said that she was aware that this same resident received a tag last year due to behavioral or PASRR issues, but she felt like it had been corrected. She said that she had never notified the local authorities or conducted an IDT meeting to facilitate treatment for the resident's behavioral issues.
In an interview on 03/25/2022 at 10:00 AM, the DON said that they had not tried any non-pharmacological interventions for Resident #23. I asked her if his Medical Doctor had ever done a competency evaluation on the resident. She said he had not, but they were going to get that done. The DON said that they had not submitted a previous request for Mental Health Services because they felt that it would not be effective. She was unaware that PASRR had not been contacted and that they should have been for the Mental Illness aspect. She said that Resident #23 has had ongoing behaviors that have been directed towards others which include sexual, physical, and verbal aggression. She said she has put an order in for a Psych evaluation and that PASRR has since been contacted and will be out in the facility next week to see the resident and provide services to him.
Requested a copy of the facilities policy and procedures that would cover treatments along with mental concerns, one was not provided at the time of exit.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0757
(Tag F0757)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident's drug regimen was free of unnecessary drugs f...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident's drug regimen was free of unnecessary drugs for (Resident #23) 1 of 1 whose medications were reviewed.
This failure could place residents at risk of being over-medicated or experience undesirable side effects and cause a physical or psychosocial decline in health.
Resident #23 (a male) received a female hormone replacement drug (Depo-Provera) due to inappropriate sexual behaviors without review for continued necessity and documented clinical rationale for the benefit or adequate monitoring from 05/2021 until 03/2022.
Findings include:
Record review of Resident #23's face sheet, dated 03/25/2022, indicated a [AGE] year-old male, who was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: Traumatic Brain Injury (Trauma to the Brain), Other Sexual Dysfunction due to a substance or known physiological condition (Sexual Dysfunction from a cause that is known) and Pseudobulbar Affect (Episodes of inappropriate laughing or crying).
Record review of Resident #23's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/26/2022, revealed in Section B, Hearing, Speech, and Vision, Resident #23 was able to make himself understood and he had the ability to understand with clear comprehension. Section C revealed Resident #23 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, which indicated he was cognitively intact. Section G revealed Resident #23 required extensive assistance and 1-person physical assist with activities of daily living except for locomotion, dressing, personal hygiene, which is supervision or limited assist. Resident #23 required the use of a wheelchair for a mobility device. Section N revealed Resident #23 had not received any injections within the past 7 days. Section Q indicated Resident #23 participated in the assessment.
Record review of resident # 23's Physician order report dated 05/11/2021, revealed the following orders: Start Date 05/11/21 End Date Ongoing for Depo-Provera (medroxyprogesterone) suspension; 150mg/mL; amt: 1mL; inject 1 applicator intramuscularly one time a day every 90 days related to other sexual dysfunction, ordered and electronically signed by [Physician A]. No behavior monitoring logs were found in the clinical record .
According to the Mayo Clinic, Depo-Provera is a well-known brand name for medroxyprogesterone acetate, a contraceptive injection that contains the hormone progestin. Depo-Provera is given as an injection every three months. Depo-Provera typically suppresses ovulation, keeping your ovaries from releasing an egg. It also thickens cervical mucus to keep sperm from reaching the egg. Accessed on 8/30/21. https://www.mayoclinic.org/tests-procedures/depo-provera/about/pac-20392204
According to the Federal Drug Administration (FDA), Depo-Provera is a progestin indicated only for the prevention of pregnancy .The recommended dose is 150mg of Depo-Provera every 3 months (13 weeks) administered by deep, intramuscular (IM) injection in the gluteal or deltoid muscle Accessed on 8/30/21.
https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2015/020246s054,021583s026lbl.pdf
In an interview on 03/24/2021 at 11:30 AM, with Resident #23 revealed the resident, was alert and oriented. He knew where he was located and was aware of his surroundings. He sat in his bed on his phone. State Surveyor explained the medication usage and side effects to him. He replied he did not want to take something like that. The State Surveyor informed him it was a medication that had already been administered. He said again he would not consent to it. The resident stated he understood what the State Surveyor asked and, he could tell people yes or no if he needed to.
In an interview on 03/24/2022 at 11:10 AM, the DON said they had received a verbal consent for Depo Provera from Resident #23's Family Member. She said that was who they received all the consents for Resident #23 from. She said that he did not have a Medical Power of Attorney. She said they did not get consents for any type of treatments, medications, or care planning from Resident #23, they only received consents from Family Member. I asked her if she had even asked the resident or informed him of what he was taking, since his BIMS score was a 12. She said that she did not, and she believed she did not have to even get a consent for this type of medication .
In an interview on 03/25/2022 at 10:00 AM, the DON said they had not tried any non-pharmacological interventions for Resident #23 prior to receiving the orders for the Depo-Provera Injection. The DON said her understanding with administering the Depo-Provera shot to male residents was it would lower the testosterone levels which would lower their sex drive.
In an interview on 03/25/2021 at 4:24 PM, Physician A said he treated Resident #23 for behaviors, which included sexual behaviors. He said he had given a verbal order in May of 2021 for Depo Provera to help with this . He said the order was only a one-time order and it should have been given along with initiation of psych services. He said he would have never of ordered Depo Provera for long term usage, as it is meant to be for short term usage. He was unsure why it was still given up to this date. He said it inhibits the patient's sexual behaviors.
Record review of the facility's policy that was furnished and said that it was their policy, was titled, Medication Regimen Review, documented [in-part]: Each resident's drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drug is any drug when used: In excessive dose, for excessive duration, without adequate monitoring , without adequate indications for its use, in the presence of adverse consequences which indicate the dose should be reduced or discontinues or any combination of the reasons below.
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** .
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure resident assessments accurately reflected...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** .
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure resident assessments accurately reflected the resident's status for 3 of 6 residents (Resident #23, Resident #27, and Resident #147) reviewed for accuracy of assessments.
The facility failed to ensure:
1. Resident #23's Annual MDS dated [DATE] section A1500 indicated: no, resident has not had a PE (PASSR EValuation Assesment) and determined to have a serious illness. However, his PE (PASSR Evaluation Assessment by the Local Mental Health Authority or Local Intellectual Disability Authority) was documented as completed in the LTC Portal 09/19/2017.
2. Resident #27's Annual MDS dated [DATE] section A1500 indicated: no, resident has not been evaluated by Level 2 PASRR and determined to have a serious illness. However, his PE (PASSR Evaluation) was documented as completed in the LTC Portal (Long Term Care Portal) 01/25/2021.
3.Resident #27's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE], indicated in section G0400 - Functional Limitations in Range of Motion the resident had no impairment in her upper or lower extremities. However, observation revealed the resident had contractures to her right hand, and fingers.
4. Resident #147's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE], indicated in section O: Respiratory Treatments - C Oxygen therapy was coded as not in use. However, the resident has required oxygen at 2 liters per minute since admission to the facility on [DATE].
These deficient practices could place residents at risk of inadequate care and services based on inaccurate assessments and a decline in health and psychosocial well-being.
The findings were:
1. Record review of Resident #23's face sheet, dated 03/25/2022, revealed a [AGE] year-old male with an initial admission date of 08/09/2017 and a readmission date of 08/09/2019. The resident had diagnoses which included: Traumatic Brain Injury dated 11/15/2018 (Principal Diagnosis), Other Sexual Dysfunction, Schizoaffective Disorder, Anxiety, Bipolar, Mood Disorder, Major Depressive Disorder and Pseudobulbar.
Record Review of Resident #23's Annual MDS, dated [DATE], revealed in Section A1500 the resident had not been evaluated by PAS and determined to have a serious mental illness and/or mental retardation or a related condition.
Record review of Resident #23's Medicaid activity form, printed 05/23/2022 and dated 09/19/2017, revealed the resident's PL 1 (initial screening to to identify an individual as having a mental ilness or intellectual disability), dated 08/20/2017, indicated yes for Intellectual Disability. His PE was documented as confirmed 09/19/2017.
Record review of Resident #23's Medicaid activity form, printed 05/23/2022 and dated 09/19/2017, revealed the resident's PL 1, dated 08/20/2017, indicated yes for Intellectual Disability. His PE was documented as confirmed 09/19/2017.
Observation and interview of Resident #23 on 03/24/2021 revealed the resident was alert and oriented. He sat in his bed on his phone. He said he had not received any additional counselling services or PASARR services.
2. Record review of Resident #27's face sheet, dated 03/25/2022, revealed a [AGE] year-old female with an initial admission date of 06/26/2020 and a readmission date of 08/12/2021. The resident had diagnoses which included: Strain of Other Specified Muscles, Fascia (thin sheet of fibrous covering enclosing a muscle) and Tendons of Wrist and Left hand, dated 12/13/21 (Principal Diagnoses), Muscle Wasting and Atrophy (degeneration), dated 10/22/2021 (Secondary Diagnosis) Chronic Pain Syndrome, dated 06/26/2020, Pain Right Knee, dated 08/26/2020, Pain Left Knee, dated 08/26/2020. Unspecified osteoarthritis, and Schizoaffective Disorder, Bipolar Type, dated 06/26/2020.
Record review of Resident #27's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], revealed in Section G0400 the resident had no functional limitation in range of motion to her upper extremity (shoulder, elbow, wrist or hand).
Record Review of Resident #27's Annual MDS, dated [DATE], revealed in Section A1500 that the resident had not been evaluated by Level II PASARR and determined to have a serious mental illness and/or mental retardation or a related condition.
Record review of Resident #27's Medicaid activity form, printed 03/23/2022 , revealed the resident's PL 1, dated 07/08/2020, indicated yes for Mental Illness. Her PE was documented as confirmed 10/15/2022.
Observation and interview of Resident #27 on 03/23/2022 at 09:52 AM revealed the resident had contractures to her right hand and fingers. There was a splint observed on the chest of drawers in her room. She stated it was a splint for her right hand and was told by the therapy department to wear it at night.
3. Record review of Resident #147's face sheet, dated 3/25/2022, revealed an admission date of 2/26/2022. The resident had diagnoses which included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, (chronic disease of the lungs) Malignant Neoplasm (a cancerous tumor that has spread to nearby tissue )of lower lobe, Right Bronchus or Lung, Dependence on Supplemental Oxygen, Anxiety Disorder Major Depressive Disorder, Atrial Fibrillation, osteoporosis without current pathologic findings, Hypertension and Muscle Spasm.
Record review of Resident #147's Physician orders, dated 03/30/2022, revealed Oxygen at 2 liters a minute via nasal cannula continuously. May titrate to 3-4 liters per minute to keep O2 saturation >90.
Record review of Resident #147's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], indicated in section O: Respiratory Treatments - C - Oxygen therapy was coded as not in use.
Observation and interview of Resident #147 on 03/23/2021 at 10:30 a.m. revealed, the resident was alert and oriented. She sat on her bed watching television iwth her oxygen in use at 2 liters per minute via nasal cannula. The Resident stated, she's been on oxygen ever since she was admitted on [DATE].
During an interview with MDS Coordinator on 03/23/2022 at 2:00 p.m., revealed Resident #147 was on oxygen therapy continuously and had been since admission to the facility on [DATE] and the MDS and Care plan were not accurate. She stated she was responsible for ensuring the document accurately reflected the resident. She stated inaccurate documentation in the MDS could result in the resident not receiving adequate treatment and services.
In an interview on 03/24/2022 at 10:30 AM, the DON stated she was aware there was a problem with the accuracy of the MDS's and Care plans. She stated the MDS nurse was responsible for the accuracy of those documents and she should have filled them out correctly. She did not state how the residents could be affected by these inaccuracy's.
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
PASARR Coordination
(Tag F0644)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to refer all level II (PASRR Evaluation assessment, used to confirm an ...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to refer all level II (PASRR Evaluation assessment, used to confirm an individual has a mental illness, an intellectual disability or a developmental disability and to develop specialized services needed) residents and all residents with newly evident or possible serious mental disorder, intellectual disability, or a related condition for level II resident review upon a significant change in status assessment for 3 of 5 residents (Resident #22, Resident #37, Resident #247) reviewed for coordination of PASRR and assessments.
The facility failed to ensure Residents #22, #37 and #247 had PASRR Level II screenings.
This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving needed mental health care and services.
Findings include:
1. Record review of Resident's #22's face sheet, dated 03/25/22, revealed a [AGE] year-old male, admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident had diagnoses which included: attention and concentration deficit following cerebral infarction, dated 07/14/2020 (primary diagnosis); Major Depressive Disorder (clinical depression), dated 07/14/2020; Schizoaffective Disorder (A mental disorder in which a person experiences a combination of symptoms of schizophrenia and mood disorder), dated 07/13/2020; unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance, dated 10/02/2020; muscle wasting and atrophy, dated 09/11/2020; abnormalities of gait and mobility, dated 09/11/2020; dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), oropharyngeal phase, dated 12/04/2021; ataxia (impaired coordination), dated 09/11/2020; seizures, dated 07/27/2021; and cognitive communication deficit, dated 11/17/2020.
Record review of the Annual MDS assessment, dated 04/19/2021, revealed Resident #22, under (Section A1500), had no mental illness, mental retardation, or a related condition; Section I - Active Diagnoses was marked positive for: I4500 cerebrovascular accident, I4800 dementia, I5400 Seizure Disorder or Epilepsy; I5800 Depression (other than bipolar) and I6000 Schizophrenia.
Record review of PASRR Level I screening (PASRR Level 1 screening to identify if an individual has an indication of mental illness, an intellectual disability or a developmental disability ), dated 08/18/2020, revealed Resident #22 was negative for mental illness, intellectual disability, and developmental disability conditions. There was no record that a PASRR Level II Screening was conducted.
Record review of Resident #22's Physician's Order Report, dated 03/25/2022, revealed orders for: sertraline 100 mg tablet daily related to Major Depressive Disorder, Recurrent, with a start date of 12/11/2020.
Record review of Resident #22's Care Plan, last revised 01/28/2022, revealed the following care plans for: A) The resident has a communication problem related to neurological symptoms. The resident had a stroke as a baby. B) The resident has impaired cognitive function/dementia or impaired thought processes related to CVA. C) The resident uses antidepressant medication, Sertraline, related to Major Depressive Disorder.
In an interview on 03/23/2022 at 10:50 AM, the MDS Coordinator said she was responsible for the PASRR's. She agreed there was an error on the PL1, dated 08/18/2020, and stated Resident #22 should have been marked yes for Mental Illness and marked yes for Intellectual Disability Disorder, due to the resident having a cerebral accident when he was an infant. She said she was responsible for completing the PL1's and checking for changes and updated them. The MDS Coordinator did not know what a 1012 form was used for and said she had never received any formal training. She said she would update Resident #22's PL1 to reflect positive mental health and Intellectual Disability Disorder.
2. Record review of Resident #37's face sheet, dated 03/25/22, revealed Resident #37 a [AGE] year-old female with an initial admission date of 03/30/21 and a readmission date of 04/01/21. Her diagnoses included Schizoaffective Disorder (A mental disorder in which a person experiences a combination of symptoms of schizophrenia and mood disorder), unspecified dated 03/30/21, Major Depressive Disorder (clinical depression), Single episode, dated 03/30/21.
Record review of the Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 02/17/2022, revealed, Section I - Active Diagnoses, was marked positive for I6000 Schizophrenia, and I5800 Depression (other than bipolar). Section N
Record review of Resident # 37's Medicaid Activity Form Activity report in the long-term care portal revealed a PASARR Level I screening, dated 09/28/2021. Resident #37 was positive for mental illness, and negative for intellectual disability, and developmental disability conditions. There was no record that a PASRR Level II Screening was conducted.
Record review of Resident #37's Physician's Order Report, dated 03/25/2022, revealed orders for: Zyprexa 15 mg tablet daily related to Schizophrenia, medication start date 08/19/2012.
Record review of Resident #37's Care Plan, last revised 03/04/22, revealed the following care plan areas:
A) The resident has a behavior problem related to Schizoaffective Disorder. B) The resident has impaired cognitive function/dementia or impaired thought processes related to iron deficiency with blood transfusion and impaired decision-making ability. C) The resident uses antipsychotic medication, Zyprexa, related to Schizoaffective Disorder.
In an interview on 03/23/2022 at 10:50 AM, the MDS Coordinator said she was responsible for the PASRR's. She agreed the PL1, dated 09/18/2021, was marked yes for Mental Illness. She said she was responsible for completing the PL1's and checking for changes and updated them. The MDS Coordinator stated Resident #37 had not had a PASRR evaluation. She said this error occurred because she did not understand it was her responsibility to contact the local authority to ensure the PE was completed. She stated she had no formal Training in PASRR. This failure could affect the residents as they would not get the services they need or quality for.
3. Record review of Resident #247's face sheet, dated 03/05/22, revealed a [AGE] year-old female, who was admitted to the facility initially on 01/07/2022, and had a re-admission date of 02/11/22. The resident had diagnoses which included: Other Depressive Episodes, Other Seizures, and Attention and Concentration Deficit Following Nontraumatic Subarachnoid Hemorrhage (Bleeding within the subarachnoid space, which is the area between the brain and the tissue covering the brain).
Record review of Resident # 247's admission MDS, dated [DATE], revealed Section I5800 was marked positive for Depression (other than Bipolar). Section N0410 documented the resident took an antidepressant for the last 7 days and she had not taken an antipsychotic.
Record review of Resident # 247's Medicaid Activity Forms in the long-term care portal revealed a PASRR Level I screening, dated 01/11/2022. Resident #247 was positive for mental illness, and negative for intellectual disability, and developmental disability conditions. There was no record that a PASARR Level II Screening was conducted.
Record review of Resident #247's Care Plan, last revised 02/15/22, revealed the following care plan areas:
A) The resident has little, or no activity related to Major Depressive Disorder. B) The resident has impaired cognitive function/dementia or impaired thought processes related to BIMS of 08 (moderate impairment), Cognition fluctuates daily C) The resident uses an Antidepressant, related to Depression.
In an interview on 03/23/2022 at 10:50 AM, the MDS Coordinator said she was responsible for the PASRR's. She agreed the PL1, dated 01/11/2022, was marked yes for Mental Illness. She said she was responsible for completing the PL1's and checking for changes and updated them. The MDS Coordinator stated Resident #247 had not had a PASRR evaluation (PE).
In an interview on 03/24/2022 at 10:30 AM, the DON stated she was aware there was a problem with the PASRR's and the MDS's. She stated the MDS Coordinator was responsible for the accuracy of those documents and she should have filled them out correctly.
Record review of the facility's policy and procedure titled PASRR Policy and Procedure stated in part:
. uses the most current version of PASRR Rules, TAC Title 40 Part 1Chapter 19, Sub -chapter BB as they pertain to PASRR Level 1, Level 2 (PE Specialized services and IDT meetings.
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0645
(Tag F0645)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident in the nursing facility was screened for a ment...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident in the nursing facility was screened for a mental disorder or intellectual disability prior to admission and individuals identified with mental disorder or intellectual disability were evaluated and received care and services appropriate to their needs for 4 of 4 residents (Resident #20, Resident #42, Resident #37, and Resident #247) reviewed for PASRR.
1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #20's PASRR Level 1, dated 10/22/2021, was positive for Mental Illness. She did not receive a PASRR Level II screening prior to admission to the facility.
2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #42, who had a diagnosis of major depressive disorder, at the time of admission, PASRR Level I was completed.
3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #37 PASRR Level I, dated 09/28/2021, was positive for Mental Illness. She did not receive a PASRR Level II Screening prior to the admission to the facility.
4. The facility failed to ensure Resident 247's PASRR Level I, dated 01/11/2022, was positive for Mental Illness. She did not receive a PASRR Level II screening prior to the admission to the facility.
Findings include:
1. Record review of Resident #20's face sheet, dated 03/25/2022, revealed a [AGE] year-old female with an initial admission date of 10/22/2021. Resident # 20 had diagnoses which included Schizophrenia (A mental disorder characterized by delusions, hallucinations, disorganized thoughts, speech and behavior), unspecified dated 10/22/2021, Other Depressive Disorders (clinical depression), dated 10/22/2021.
Record review of the Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 02/17/2021, revealed in Section I - Active Diagnoses, was marked positive for I6000 Schizophrenia, and I5800 Depression (other than bipolar). Section N was marked 7 days for Antipsychotics and Antidepressant Medications received.
Record review of Resident # 20's Medicaid Activity Form Activity report in the long-term care portal revealed a PASRR Level I screening, dated 10/22/2021. Resident #20 was positive for mental illness, and negative for intellectual disability, and developmental disability conditions. There was no record a PASRR Level II Screening was conducted. The form instructed the facility to contact the local PASRR authorities.
Record review of Resident #20's Physician's Order Report, dated 03/25/2022, revealed orders for: Ziprasidone HCI capsule 40 mg daily related to Schizophrenia, medication start date 10/22/202 and Fluoxetine HCI capsule 40 mg daily related to Other Specified Depressive Episodes.
Record review of Resident #20's Care Plan, last revised 01/21/2022, revealed the following care plan areas:
A) The resident has a behavior problem related to Schizoaffective Disorder and Major Depressive Disorder. B) The resident will be free from discomfort or adverse reactions related to antidepressant therapy through the review date. B) The resident uses antipsychotic medication, Geodon, related to Schizoaffective Disorder. The resident will remain free of psychotropic drug related complications, including movement disorder, discomfort, hypotension, gait disturbance, constipation/impaction or cognitive/behavior impairment through the review date.
In an interview on 10/22/2021 at 10:50 AM, the MDS Coordinator said she was responsible for the PASRR's. She stated the PL1, dated 09/18/2021, was marked yes for Mental Illness. She said she was responsible for completing the PL1's and checking for changes and updated them. The MDS Coordinator stated Resident #20 had not had a PASRR evaluation. She said this error occurred because she did not understand it was her responsibility to contact the local authority to ensure the PE was completed. She stated she had no formal Training in PASRR.
2. Record review of Resident #37's face sheet, dated 03/25/2022, revealed a [AGE] year-old female with an initial admission date of 03/30/2021 and a readmission date of 04/01/21. Resident # 37 had diagnoses which included Schizoaffective Disorder (a mental disorder in which a person experiences a combination of symptoms of schizophrenia and mood disorder), unspecified dated 03/30/2021, Major Depressive Disorder (clinical depression), Single episode, dated 03/30/2021.
Record review of the Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 02/17/2022, revealed in Section I - Active Diagnoses, was marked positive for I6000 Schizophrenia, and I5800 Depression (other than bipolar). Section N.
Record review of Resident # 37's Medicaid Activity Form Activity report in the long-term care portal revealed a PASARR Level I screening, dated 09/28/2021. Resident #37 was positive for mental illness, and negative for intellectual disability, and developmental disability conditions. There was no record a PASRR Level II Screening was conducted.
Record review of Resident #37's Physician's Order Report, dated 03/25/2022, revealed orders for: Zyprexa 15 mg tablet daily related to Schizophrenia, medication start date 08/19/2022.
Record review of Resident #37's Care Plan, last revised 03/04/2022, revealed the following care plan areas:
A) The resident had a behavior problem related to Schizoaffective Disorder. B) The resident has impaired cognitive function/dementia or impaired thought processes related to iron deficiency with blood transfusion and Impaired decision-making ability. C) The resident uses antipsychotic medication, Zyprexa, related to Schizoaffective Disorder.
In an interview on 03/23/2022 at 10:50 AM, the MDS Coordinator said she was responsible for the PASRR's. She stated the PL1, dated 09/18/2021, was marked yes for Mental Illness. She said she was responsible for completing the PL1's and checking for changes and updated them. The MDS Coordinator stated Resident #37 had not had a PASRR evaluation. She said this error occurred because she did not understand it was her responsibility to contact the local authority to ensure the PE was completed. She stated she had no formal Training in PASRR.
3. Record review of Resident #42's admission Record, printed 3/24/2022, revealed a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #42's admission diagnoses included major depressive disorder (clinical depression), recurrent and unspecified psychosis (a severe mental disorder in which thought and emotions are so impaired that contact is lost with external reality).
Record review of Resident #42's admission MDS assessment, dated 02/22/2022, revealed no PASRR conditions of MI, ID, or DD had been selected. Review of the diagnosis section for Psychiatric/Mood Disorder revealed depression (other than bipolar) was selected.
Record review of Resident #42's electronic health record revealed no documented evidence a PASRR Level 1 Screening (PL1) had been completed.
During an interview and observation on 03/24/22 at 3:05 PM, as the MDS Coordinator was observed reviewing the resident record, the MDS Coordinator stated she was responsible for PASRR screenings and follow-up with the LIDDA/LMHA regarding PASRR positive residents and specialized services. She reviewed Resident #42's diagnoses list and stated the resident's admission diagnoses on 02/15/2022 included major depressive disorder, recurrent and unspecified psychosis. She proceeded to review Resident #42's admission MDS assessment, dated 02/22/2022, and stated no PASRR conditions of MI, ID, or DD had been selected on the assessment. The MDS Coordinator said the records for Resident #42 in the online PASRR portal and stated she had completed the PL1 for Resident #42 on 03/23/2022, and had selected the indication of MI. She stated there was not a prior PL1 completed for Resident #42 at the time of her admission to the facility.
4. Record review of Resident #247's face sheet, dated 03/05/2022, revealed a [AGE] year-old female, who was admitted to the facility initially on 01/07/2022, and had a re-admission date of 02/11/2022. The resident had diagnoses which included: Other Depressive Episodes (a period of depression that persists for at least two weeks), Other Seizures (sudden, uncontrolled electrical disturbance in the brain which can cause changes in behavior, movements, feelings, and consciousness), and Attention and Concentration Deficit Following Nontraumatic Subarachnoid Hemorrhage (bleeding within the subarachnoid space, which is the area between the brain and the tissue covering the brain.)
Record Review of Resident # 247's admission MDS, dated [DATE], revealed Section I5800 was marked positive for Depression (other than Bipolar). Section N0410 documented the resident took an antidepressant for the last 7 days and she had not taken an antipsychotic.
Record review of Resident # 247's Medicaid Activity Forms in the long-term care portal revealed a PASRR Level I screening, dated 01/11/2022. Resident #247 was positive for mental illness, and negative for intellectual disability, and developmental disability conditions. There was no record a PASRR Level II Screening was conducted.
Record review of Resident #247's Care Plan, last revised 02/15/2022, revealed the following care plan areas:
A) The resident has little, or no activity related to Major Depressive Disorder. B) The resident has impaired cognitive function/dementia or impaired thought processes related to BIMS of 08 (moderately impaired), Cognition fluctuates daily C) The resident uses an Antidepressant, related to Depression.
In an interview on 03/23/2022 at 10:50 AM, the MDS Coordinator said she was responsible for the PASRR's. She stated the PL1, dated 01/11/2022, was marked yes for Mental Illness. She said she was responsible for completing the PL1's and checking for changes and updated them. The MDS Coordinator stated Resident #247 had not had a PASRR evaluation (PE).
In an interview on 03/24/2022 at 10:30 AM, the DON stated she was not aware there was a problem with the PASRR's and the MDS' being completed correctly. She stated the MDS Coordinator was responsible for the accuracy of those documents and she should have filled them out correctly.
Record review of the facility's policy and procedure titled PASRR Policy and Procedure stated in part:
. uses the most current version of PASRR Rules, TAC Title 40 Part 1Chapter 19, Sub -chapter BB as they pertain to PASRR Level 1, Level 2 (PE Specialized services and IDT meetings.
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for ...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, which included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment and described the services that were to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 2 of 12 residents (Resident #27 and Resident #147) reviewed for comprehensive care plans.
1. The facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for Resident #27 to include the Limited Range of Motion (contractures) to her right hand and fingers.
2. The facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for Resident #147 after the resident was admitted with an order for oxygen.
These failures could place residents at risk for not having their individual needs met.
Findings include:
1. Record review of Resident #27's face sheet, dated 03/25/2022, revealed a [AGE] year-old female with an initial admission date of 06/26/2020 and a readmission date of 08/12/2021. Her diagnoses included: Strain of Other Specified Muscles, Fascia (tissue surrounding a muscle)and Tendons of Wrist and Left hand, dated 12/13/21 (Principal Diagnoses), Muscle Wasting and Atrophy (degeneration of cells), dated 10/22/2021 (Secondary Diagnosis) Chronic Pain Syndrome, dated 06/26/2020, Pain Right Knee, dated 08/26/2020, Pain Left Knee, dated 08/26/2020. Unspecified osteoarthritis, and Schizoaffective Disorder, Bipolar Type, dated 06/26/2020.
Record review of Resident #27's comprehensive care plan revealed a revision was documented by the MDS coordinator on 02/02/2022. The resident's Comprehensive Care Plan was not revised to include the contractures to Resident # 27's right hand and fingers
During an interview on 03/23/2022 at 2:00 PM, the MDS Coordinator stated the care plan had not been updated since the facility did not have an interdisciplinary care plan meeting in February 2022 when the quarterly MDS was completed. She stated she did not know how the care plan meeting was missed. She stated the care plan meetings were scheduled when the MDS was completed on each resident. She stated she provided the list to the Social Worker. She stated the resident's contractures would have been addressed if the care plan meeting had been held. She stated the MDS nurse was responsible for documenting this information in the care plan. She stated the care plan meeting not being held could result in the resident not receiving the care and treatment she should be receiving.
In an interview on 03/24/2022 at 10:30 AM, the Social Worker stated the people who usually attended the Care Plan meeting were the MDS Coordinator, the Social Worker, Activity Director and Dietary Manager. She stated occasionally an ADON, or therapy would attend. She did not provide any further documentation of other care plan meetings but stated Resident #27 would have her next care plan meeting in May 2022 with her next comprehensive assessment.
Interview with the Occupational Therapy Assistant on 03/24/2022 at 9:45 AM with the COTA revealed Resident #27 was discharged from therapy on 02/18/2022 after her therapy goals had been met. The COTA stated Resident #27 should be wearing her splint at night. She stated there was not an order written by therapy to communicate the physician's orders to Nursing at the time she acquired the splint. She stated there was a communication breakdown between nursing and therapy due to the order not being written and stated it was therapy's responsibility to write the order for the orthotic device to be applied to her right hand and arm each night. She did not know who was responsible for updating the resident's care plan.
2. Record review of Resident #147's face sheet, dated 03/25/2022, revealed an admission date of 02/26/2022. The resident had diagnoses which included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (a chronic disease of the lungs), Malignant Neoplasm (tumor that has spread to nearby tissue ) of lower lobe, Right Bronchus or Lung, Dependence on Supplemental Oxygen, Anxiety Disorder Major Depressive Disorder, Atrial Fibrillation, osteoporosis without current pathologic findings, Hypertension, Muscle Spasm.
Record review of Resident #147's Physician orders, dated 03/30/2022, revealed Oxygen at 2 liters a minute via nasal cannula continuously. May titrate to 3-4 liters per minute to keep O2 stats >90.
Record review of Resident #147's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], indicated in section O: Respiratory Treatments - C - Oxygen therapy was coded as not in use.
Record review of Resident 147's care plan revealed no documentation of the resident receiving oxygen therapy.
Observation and interview of Resident #147 on 03/23/2021 at 10:30 a.m. revealed, the resident was alert and oriented. She sat on her bed watching television With her oxygen in use at 2 liters per minute via nasal cannula. The resident revealed, she's been on oxygen ever since she was admitted on [DATE].
During an interview with the MDS Coordinator on 03/23/2022 at 2:00 p.m. revealed the resident was on oxygen therapy continuously and had been since admission to the facility on [DATE] and the MDS and care plan were not accurate.
In an interview on 03/24/2022 at 10:30 AM the DON stated she was aware there was a problem with the care plans not be accurate She stated the MDS Coordinator was responsible for the accuracy of those documents and she should have filled them out correctly.
Record review of the facility Care Plan/ Care Area Assessments policy revealed in part: The Interdisciplinary Care Plan in conjunction with the resident or his representative develop and implement a comprehensive care plan for each resident. The care plan interventions are derived from a thorough analysis of the information gathered as part of the comprehensive assessment. The IDT includes the attending physician, a registered nurse, a nurse's aide who has responsibility for the resident, a member of the food and nutrition service department, the resident or legal representative, and other appropriate staff or professionals determined by the resident's needs.
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure comprehensive care plans were reviewed and revised by the int...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure comprehensive care plans were reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment which included both the comprehensive and quarterly review assessments for 1 of 12 residents (Resident # 27) reviewed for care plan timing and revision.
The facility failed to ensure Resident #27 had a care plan meeting when it was due after her quarterly MDS Assessment on 02/02/2022.
This failure could place residents at risk of not being able to attain or maintain their highest practicable level of physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being.
The findings include:
Record review of Resident #27's face sheet, dated 03/25/2022, revealed a [AGE] year-old female with an initial admission date of 06/26/2020 and a readmission date of 08/12/2021. Resident #27 had diagnoses which included: Strain of Other Specified Muscles, Fascia (tissue surrounding a muscle) and Tendons of Wrist and Left hand, dated 12/13/21 (Principal Diagnoses), Muscle Wasting and Atrophy (degeneration), dated 10/22/2021 (Secondary Diagnosis) Chronic Pain Syndrome, dated 06/26/2020, Pain Right Knee, dated 08/26/2020, Pain Left Knee, dated 08/26/2020. Unspecified osteoarthritis, and Schizoaffective Disorder, Bipolar Type, dated 06/26/2020.
Record review of Resident #27's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 02/24/2022, revealed a BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score of 12, which indicated mild cognitive impairment.
Record review of a document titled Care Plan Conference Summary, dated 11/23/2021, provided by the Social Worker, documented in the Summary of care conference attendance discussion signed by the Social Worker, DS Coordinator, and one other attendee whose signature was not legible. The was no care plan documented in February of 2022.
Interview with Resident #27 on 03/23/2022 at 09:52 AM revealed did not remember being invited to a care plan meeting.
In an interview on 03/23/2022 at 11:00 AM, the ADON stated she did not attend care plan meetings routinely. She stated she was not sure when the care plan meetings were held unless she was invited.
In an interview on 03/24/2022 at 10:30 AM, the Social Worker stated the people who usually attended the care plan meeting were the MDS Coordinator, the Social Worker, Activity Director and Dietary Manager. She stated occasionally an ADON would attend. She did not provide any further documentation of other care plan meetings but stated Resident #27 would have her next care plan meeting in May with her next quarterly assessment. She stated resident # 27's last care plan was held in November of 20222. She stated she did not know how the meeting was missed. She stated the MDS Nurse was responsible for notifying the social worker when the care plan meetings were due at the time of the comprehensive, quarterly , or significant change MDS.
Record review of the facilities policy titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person Centered revealed in part: The Interdisciplinary Team must update and review the care plan at least quarterly in conjunction with the required quarterly MDS.
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Menu Adequacy
(Tag F0803)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the menus were followed.
The entire planned main menu for the lunch meal on 03/22/22 was substituted, due to not having...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the menus were followed.
The entire planned main menu for the lunch meal on 03/22/22 was substituted, due to not having the main menu entrée of enchiladas.
The planned main menu and alternate menu had lunch meal food items substituted, due to not having cauliflower.
This failure could place residents at risk of compromised nutrtitional status related to not receiving planned meals approved by the Registered Dietician.
The findings include:
Record review of the planned Weekly Menu for Fall/Winter 2021-2022 - Week 1 revealed the following:
- Tuesday, 03/22/22 Lunch menu consisted of enchilada casserole, Spanish rice, shredded lettuce and diced tomato, banana pudding, tableside condiments, water, and choice of beverage. The alternate menu consisted of roast turkey, yam patties, and smothered squash.
Record review of the Substitution Record form revealed changes in the following menu food items:
- 03/22/22 Tuesday Week 1 Lunch - Added ham, sweet potato, and broccoli for omitted items of enchiladas and Spanish rice - reason for change: no enchiladas.
- 03/22/22 Tuesday Week 1 Lunch - Alternate added beef patty and broccoli for omitted items of roast turkey - reason for change: no turkey.
Record review of the planned Weekly Menu for Thursday, 03/24/22, Lunch menu for mechanical soft diets revealed in consisted of 1 each ground crispy onion chicken, 1/2 cup cream style corn, 1/2 cup cauliflower with cheese sauce, dinner roll, 1/2 cup ambrosia (dessert), 8 oz water, and 8 oz beverage of choice. The alternate lunch menu consisted of meatballs with gravy, parslied noodles, and broccoli florets.
Record review of the Substitution Record form revealed changes in the following menu food items:
03/24/22 Thursday Week 1 Lunch - added broccoli for omitted item of cauliflower - reason for change: no cauliflower.
The Thursday lunch menu did not document the substitution of mashed potatoes as added for the omitted item of cream style corn or parslied noodles for the mechanical soft diet menu.
Observation on 03/24/22 at 12:09 PM revealed [NAME] B measured the food holding temperatures on the steam table. The steam table held a pan with mashed potatoes. There was not a pan with prepared parslied noodles.
During an interview and observation on 03/22/22 at 9:20 AM, [NAME] B sliced ham on the food preparation counter. She stated she had to substitute the entire lunch menu for today due to not having the enchiladas and not having banana pudding. She stated the residents would be served ham, sweet potatoes, broccoli, a dinner roll, and pistachio pudding. She stated a substitution log was used and was on a clip board hanging on the wall. [NAME] B stated grocery orders were delivered one time weekly on Tuesday afternoons around 2:00 PM and there would be a delivery today. She stated they had not received food items as ordered due to items being on back order.
In an interview on 03/24/22 at 10:50 AM, [NAME] B stated she substituted broccoli with cheese sauce for the cauliflower with cheese sauce for the lunch meal today, due to not having any cauliflower. She stated she did not have cream style corn for the mechanical soft diets and would substitute noodles for the cream style corn. [NAME] B stated on Tuesday, 03/22/22, she did not have a planned menu for the substituted lunch meal and went by other menu plans serving sizes. She stated she served 3 oz sliced ham, 4 oz (1/2 cup) broccoli, 4 oz (1/2 cup) yams, 4 oz (1/2 cup) pudding, and a dinner roll.
In an interview on 3/25/22 at 9:05 AM, [NAME] B and Dietary Aide C stated there was a Corporate Dietician who did not come to the facility, and a Registered Dietician Consultant who did come to the facility monthly. They stated the facility used menus that were approved by the Corporate office and were sent to the facility via email, and the dietary staff printed the menus from the computer.
In an interview on 03/25/22 at 9:10 AM, [NAME] B stated food was ordered according to the menu, but some things had been on back-order and not delivered.
In an interview on 03/25/22 at 9:50 AM, the facility's Regional Director of Operations stated he would get the dietary policies/procedures for food substitutions. He stated food was not being delivered as ordered and substitutions had to be made.
In an interview on 03/25/22 at 3:30 PM, the Dietary Manager stated cauliflower could have been served for the lunch meal the prior day (03/24/22). He stated cauliflower was available in the freezer and the cooks did not look. He also stated there had been enchiladas in the freezer and they should have been served for the lunch meal according to the menu on Tuesday (03/22/22). The Dietary Manager stated the cauliflower and enchiladas were not delivered this past Tuesday afternoon (03/22/22), they were already in the freezer.
Record review of the Dietary Services Policy/Procedures for Substitutions, dated 2001 and Revised April 2007, revealed the following [in part]:
Policy Statement
Food substitutions will be made as appropriate and necessary.
Policy Interpretation and Implementation
1. The food services manager, in conjunction with the clinical dietician, may make food substitutions as appropriate or necessary. The food services shift supervisor on duty will make substitutions only when unavoidable .
3. Residents' likes and dislikes will be considered when making substitutions.
4. All substitutions are noted on the menu and filed in accordance with established dietary policies. Notations of substitutions must include the reason for the substitution.
5. The food services manager will review the substitutions regularly to avoid recurrences when possible.
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in one of one kit...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in one of one kitchen reviewed.
1. The facility failed to ensure the hand washing sink surface was clean in the dish room.
2. The facility failed to ensure there was a waste basket for disposing used paper towels by the hand washing sink in the food preparation area.
3. The facility failed to ensure appliance and equipment surfaces were not soiled with grease build-up, food crumbs and dust.
4. The facility failed to ensure open food item packages were properly sealed in bags or storage containers.
5. The facility failed to ensure foods were labeled and dated with the date opened and the date to be discarded if not used.
6. The facility failed to ensure unopened bottles of whipping cream and containers with cottage cheese were not past the manufacturer's dates and did not remain in the walk-in refrigerator.
These failure could place residents at risk for foodborne illness and a decline in health status.
The findings include:
Observations on 03/22/22 at 9:18 AM, during the initial tour of the kitchen, revealed the following:
- the hand washing sink in the dish room had a Styrofoam cup containing coffee resting on the sink to the right of the cold water faucet;
- the dish room hand washing sink surface was soiled with dirty/dark colored stains.
- the hand washing sink in the food preparation area did not have a waste basket located near it for disposing used paper towels; a large, uncovered trash can was located across the room for disposing paper towels after washing hands;
- 1 of 2 coffee makers was not working and the container filled with brewed tea was not covered and was open to the air on the counter in the beverage station area;
- the ice machine interior door surface was soiled with dried beverage residue and the top exterior surface was soiled with dust;
- the steam table pan lids were soiled with grease build-up and dried food;
- 3 plastic bulk storage containers were stored on a shelf beneath the food preparation counter and were used for thickener, flour, and granulated sugar. The container lids were soiled with food and grease;
- the electric mixer stand was soiled with dried splattered batter;
- the manual can opener blade was soiled with a dark colored build-up;
- the exterior surfaces of the fryer unit were soiled/greasy and the interior surface had remnants of fried food crumbs and dark colored cooking oil;
- stainless steel shelf surfaces were soiled with food crumbs, spilled spices, and dust;
- exterior surfaces of the stainless-steel refrigerator doors were soiled with dried food and liquids.
Observation on 03/22/22 at 9:32 AM of the non-perishable food storage room revealed the following:
- 5 pound packages with white cake mix, dated 01/11/22, lemon cake mix, dated 01/04/22, blue berry muffin mix, the date was not legible, and brownie mix, dated 03/08/22, were opened and rolled to close and wrapped with plastic wrap;
- packages with vanilla wafers and flake coconut were opened and wrapped with plastic wrap; they were not labeled and dated;
- 2 packages of miniature marshmallows had been opened; 1 bag was knotted/tied to close and 1 was wrapped with plastic wrap; they were not labeled and dated.
-The dry food items were stored on wire rack shelf units. The open packages had not been placed in resealable (Ziploc) bags or storage containers with lids.
Observation on 03/22/22 at 9:43 AM revealed the walk-in refrigerator had wire rack shelves, which held the following:
- an open package with Parmesan cheese was not resealed, labeled or dated;
- an open package with shredded mild cheddar cheese was wrapped in plastic wrap and dated 03/18/22;
- three 1-quart plastic bottles with whipping cream were unopened with a manufacturer's expiration date of 03/01/22;
- two 5 pound containers with cottage cheese - one was opened and almost empty (light weight), and one was unopened; both container had a manufacturer's expiration date of 03/11/22.
- the walk-in freezer contained an open package with blueberries, which were not resealed or dated; the bag was open to the air.
During an observation and interview on 03/22/22 at 9:45 AM, the Dietary Manager began removing outdated food items from the shelves in the walk-in refrigerator. He stated, We don't use the whipping cream anyway.
In an interview on 03/25/22 at 9:10 AM, [NAME] B stated there was a daily cleaning list on a clipboard which hung on the wall and they used it yesterday. She stated she did not know where the clip board with this week's cleaning list was located or why it was not hanging on the wall. She stated there were cleaning lists for the cooks and the dietary aides.
Record review of the facility's Dietary Services Policy/Procedures for Food Receiving and Storage, dated 2001 and Revised October 2017 [in part]:
Policy Statement
Foods shall be received and stored in a manner that complies with safe food handling practices.
1. Food services, or other designated staff, will maintain clean food storage areas at all times .
8. All foods stored in the refrigerator or freezer will be covered, labeled and dated (use by date).
Record review of the facility's Policy/Procedure for Kitchen and Equipment Cleaning and Sanitation - Dining Services, dated 12/2020, revealed the following [in part]:
Policy:
The kitchen and dining service equipment and food contact surfaces shall be maintained in a clean and sanitized condition.
Procedure:
Dining Services staff shall be trained on cleaning and sanitizing processes.
The Dietary Manager shall provide cleaning assignments to indicate the time and task to be completed by dining services staff. The Dietary Manager is responsible to ensure that cleaning assignments have been timely completed
Equipment food contact surfaces and utensils shall be clean to sight and touch.
Food contact surfaces of cooking equipment and pans shall be kept free of encrusted grease deposits and other accumulations.
Nonfood contact surfaces of equipment shall be kept free of an accumulation of dust, dirt, food residue, and other debris .
Frequency of Cleaning:
Equipment food contact surfaces and utensils used with potentially hazardous food shall be cleaned throughout the day at least every four hours.
Nonfood contact surfaces of equipment shall be cleaned at a frequency necessary to prevent accumulation of soil residues .
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 2017 Food Code specified:
Food storage/labelling
3-501.17 Ready-to-Eat, Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food, Date Marking.
(A) FOOD prepared and held in a FOOD ESTABLISHMENT for more than 24 hours shall be clearly marked to indicate the date or day by which the FOOD shall be consumed on the PREMISES, sold, or discarded when held at a temperature of 5ºC (41ºF) or less for a maximum of 7 days.
4-601.11
Equipment, Food-Contact Surfaces, Nonfood-Contact Surfaces, and Utensils. (C) Nonfood-contact surfaces of equipment shall be kept free of an accumulation of dust, dirt, food residue, and other debris.