Midwestern Healthcare Center

601 Midwestern Pkwy, Wichita Falls, TX 76302 (940) 723-0885
For profit - Corporation 121 Beds NEXION HEALTH Data: November 2025 3 Immediate Jeopardy citations
Trust Grade
0/100
#1050 of 1168 in TX
Last Inspection: July 2024

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Midwestern Healthcare Center has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating poor performance with significant concerns about resident safety and care. Ranking #1050 out of 1168 facilities in Texas places them in the bottom half, and they are the lowest-ranked facility in Wichita County. The trend is worsening, as the number of issues increased from 2 in 2024 to 3 in 2025. While staffing is a strength with a rating of 4 out of 5 stars and a turnover rate of 45%, which is below the state average, there have been serious incidents reported. For example, there were critical failures to prevent and report verbal abuse towards a resident, leading to police intervention and the identification of Immediate Jeopardy, highlighting serious concerns about resident safety. Overall, while staffing is relatively stable, the facility struggles with compliance and reports of abuse, making it a concerning option for families.

Trust Score
F
0/100
In Texas
#1050/1168
Bottom 11%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Getting Worse
2 → 3 violations
Staff Stability
○ Average
45% turnover. Near Texas's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
Penalties
✓ Good
$45,975 in fines. Lower than most Texas facilities. Relatively clean record.
Skilled Nurses
⚠ Watch
Each resident gets only 19 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Texas. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
Violations
⚠ Watch
32 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Overall Rating
★★★★☆
4.0
Staff Levels
★★★★☆
4.0
Care Quality
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2024: 2 issues
2025: 3 issues

The Good

  • 4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
  • 4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record
  • Staff turnover below average (45%)

    3 points below Texas average of 48%

Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, fire safety.

The Bad

1-Star Overall Rating

Below Texas average (2.8)

Significant quality concerns identified by CMS

Staff Turnover: 45%

Near Texas avg (46%)

Typical for the industry

Federal Fines: $45,975

Above median ($33,413)

Moderate penalties - review what triggered them

Chain: NEXION HEALTH

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

The Ugly 32 deficiencies on record

3 life-threatening
Jun 2025 3 deficiencies 3 IJ (2 affecting multiple)
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to keep the residents free from abuse, neglect, misappro...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to keep the residents free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation for 1 (Resident #1) of 16 residents reviewed. The facility failed to prevent verbal abuse to Resident #1 by LVN B. This failure resulted in the identification of Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 6/04/25 at 2:09 pm. While the immediacy was removed on 6/06/25 at 1:02 pm, the facility remained out of compliance at scope of pattern and severity no actual harm due to the facility's need to monitor the implementation of the plan of removal. This failure could place the residents at risk of serious emotional, psychological, and physical anguish. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's electronic health record revealed a [AGE] year-old female, admission date 4/30/25. Her diagnoses included: Autistic Disorder (neurodevelopmental disorder with difficulties in social interaction and social communication), Fetal Alcohol Syndrome (life-long physical, cognitive, and behavioral issues), long-term drug therapy, epilepsy (seizure disorder), tachycardia (rapid heart rate). Resident was discharged on 05/05/2025. Record review of police report dated 5/4/25 at 6:59pm revealed When [Police officer] arrived, [Police officer] made contact with the reporting party, [LVN A], she stated they received a new patient [Resident #1] approximately 2 days ago. [LVN A] stated [Resident #1] was a psych patient who had been having a hard time adjusting to the facility. [LVN A] requested that [Police officer] speak with [Resident #1] to see if she met criteria to be assessed by [LIDDA] for a psych evaluation. [Police officer] made contact with [Resident #1] at the nurse's station, [Resident #1] was very upset at the time and was refusing to speak with [Police officer]. While [Police officer] was speaking to [Resident #1] in an attempt to build a rapport [LVN B] began walking towards the nurse's station. When [LVN B] approached the area, she began making statements like, Y'all need to take her ass somewhere. and Her [family member] needs to come get her! [LVN B] was very agitated and extremely rude. [Police officer] began asking [LVN B] for more background information on [Resident #1] because she did not speak to me. [LVN B] stated She is trying her crap. after she stated this [Resident #1] yelled at [LVN B] to shut up. [LVN B] stated, You don't scare me none, you might your [family member] but not me. I began explaining to [LVN B] our criteria and that I would not just be able to take her. [LVN B] began talking and said, Well then she needs to go to her room because she is one on one. [Resident #1] then yelled, I don't have to if I don't fucking want to! [LVN B] then turned to [Resident #1] pointed at her and yelled very angrily Go to your room! and then held her middle finger up towards [Resident #1]. That was when [Resident #1] stated I can punch you! and [LVN B] turned to [Resident #1] and waved her fingers as if inviting her over and stated, Come on! [Resident #1] stood aggressively and began walking towards [LVN B]. An aide and I stood between the two to keep things from escalating. [LVN B] stated She needs to go to jail mam! she then stated, Her [family member] dropped her here because she can't take care of her. another nurse stated neither of [Resident #1's] [family members] was answering the phone and [LVN B's] response was They don't want to have anything to do with her. [Resident #1] responded Shut up! and [LVN B] replied, Just telling the truth honey. This upset [Resident #1] to the point where she wanted to hurt [LVN B]. An aide and I continued following [Resident #1] and trying to keep her calm and away from [LVN B]. I was finally able to get [Resident #1] to separate and have a seat in the living area of the facility .[Police officer] contacted crisis line to see if she could be assessed by [LIDDA] .[LIDDA] came to the facility for the assessment and put in a referral to [Behavioral health hospital] and was denied due to [Resident #1's] IQ. LIDDA attempted an emergency detention order to the state hospital, and they refused the order. Officers remained until [Resident #1] was in bed and no longer a threat to the staff. Observation of body cam footage from police officer dated 5/4/25 from 7:12pm-7:19pm revealed the Police officer entered the building of the facility and went to the nurse's station and asked for the nurse that called and was directed down the hall to LVN A at her med cart. LVN A stated Resident #1 is a psych patient and need to see about an evaluation. LVN A pointed towards the nurse's station and stated the Police Officer could ask and aide where Resident #1 is. The Police officer walked to the nurse's station and CNA E showed Police officer who Resdient #1 was. Resident #1 was sitting in chair against the wall at the nurse's station quiet and looking around shaking her left leg and 1:1 aide (CNA E) was three chairs down from resident. Three residents sitting in chairs next to resident. Police officer attempted to speak to Resident #1, and she would not speak to the police officer. Resident #1 stated shut up to someone behind the police officer not seen on camera. Police officer turned around and LVN B wheeled her cart to the nurse's station and stated to the police officer, She's trying her crap & she needs to go to jail and Resident #1 stated shut up, shut up. LVN B stated, Don't scare me none, might your [family member] but not me. The police officer attempted to explain to LVN B that she can't just take her, and Resident #1 is not speaking to her. LVN B stated, she needs to go to her room, she's 1:1 and looks towards Resident #1. Resident #1 said, I don't have to if I don't fucking want to. LVN B stated, you need to go to your room loudly towards Resident #1 (Resident #1 not in camera view). LVN B flips Resident #1 off and states, I can do it too and Resident #1 stated, I can punch you and LVN B stated, come on and waved her fingers gesturing towards her to come, you punch me you're going to jail as Resident #1 is seen getting up and walking towards LVN B. Police officer says uh-uh and CNA D puts herself between LVN B and Resident #1. LVN B no longer in camera view. Resident #1 stated I don't care and Police officer tells her to go sit down. LVN B stated, she needs to go to jail ma'am, her [family member] left her here because she can't take care of her. They don't want to have anything to do with her. Resident #1 stated shut up and appeared to be tearing up. LVN B said, just telling the truth honey. CNA D stated, let's go for a walk, want to go for a walk with me and Resident #1 states, No, I want to punch that bitch. CNA D and Police officer said no, we are not doing that, and we have to respect our elders. CNA D stated again, want to go for a walk and LVN B (no longer in camera view) stated she's not to be out of her room for one thing. Resident #1 stated, yes I can and LVN B stated, she's on 1:1. CNA D encouraged Resident #1 to practice breathing. Resident #1 looks at her watch and a sound from watch played and Police officer stated, that's you [family member] right there. Resident #1 stated, I don't care. Police officer said, you don't want to talk to your [family member]? Resident #1 pulled a pen out of her left shorts pocket and stated, I wanna stab that bitch and CNA D stated, let's go on a walk, let's remove ourselves from the situation and we don't have to be ugly let's remove and go on a walk and calm down. We don't need to do the extra stuff. Resident #1 started walking towards the entrance of the nurse's station and CNA D walked with her and LVN C is seen at a med cart on the computer. Police and CNA D walk with Resident #1. CNA D put herself in the entry and police asked if she wanted to go walk with CNA D and Resident #1 said No and police said, we are not going over there with her and touched Resident #1's arm. Resident #1 shook police officer off and said move. The police officer said, back up, you're not going over there. Resident #1 tried to walk around CNA D and CNA D said [Resident #1], I'm not letting you in there, we can go for a walk, we can remove ourselves but that is not happening and Resident #1 stopped and stood still. Someone unknown stated, she's not supposed to be out here and Resident #1 stated yes I can. CNA D stated Let's go for a walk. LVN A is heard explaining Resident #1's actions to someone. The police officer asked Resident #1 if she wants to go outside, and she said no. CNA D stated I need you to back up, you are in my bubble and Resident #1 stepped back. CNA D thanked her. Someone from the nurse's station attempted to give Resident #1 the phone and CNA D stated your [family member] wants to talk to you. Resident #1 hung up the phone. The police officer stated How can we help you if you won't talk to anybody. We are here to help you. CNA D asked Resident #1 if she wants to go get a soda and Resident #1 shook her head no. LVN A asked CNA D she hung up? and CNA D said, oh yeah she hung up the phone. Resident #1 starts walking away. End video. In an interview on 5/18/25 at 10:45 am with the Police Officer, she stated she went out to the facility for a call for a welfare check on Resident #1 by LVN A. Resident #1 was very upset, and the Police officer got her to calm down. The Police officer stated that LVN B told the Police Officer she needed to take her [Resident #1] ass to jail. Resident #1 was right there so she heard LVN B. LVN B stated Resident #1's [family member] needed to come get her and Resident #1 needed to be in her room on 1:1. The Police officer stated Resident #1 stated she did not have to be in her room and LVN B flipped off Resident #1 and Resident #1 flipped off LVN B and then LVN B stated that's why nobody wants you. That's why she (family member) dropped you off to Resident #1. The police officer stated that Resident #1 said she was going to hit LVN B and LVN B said, do it. The Police officer said she got in between them and there were lots of staff around and nobody removed LVN B. The Police Officer stated it was not against the law, there was no immediate threat for Resident #1, and she had another nurse, and the police de-escalate the situation, so it was not enough to take LVN B in. LVN A was the nurse that called 911 to come check on Resident #1. In an interview on 5/18/25 at 1:30pm with DON, the DON stated she had never been told about the incident with LVN B by anyone until right then. Resident #1 was trying to hurt herself while she was at the facility and was there for 5 days, and was never without staff supervision. The DON stated she was never told about LVN B acting that way and would report it now and start an investigation now. She would have reported it at the time had she been made aware. The DON stated the Administrator, at the time, was no longer there. The DON stated he was the abuse coordinator and DON was the backup abuse coordinator at that time. In an interview on 5/18/25 at 5:50pm with LVN A, she stated she spoke with the police and witnessed Resident #1 trying to get at LVN B, but she did not know what initiated it. LVN A stated the aides prevented Resident #1 from getting LVN B so Resident #1 started throwing things down the hall. LVN A stated Resident #1 did calm down, went back to her room with her 1:1 staff, and went to sleep. LVN A stated she called Guardian A, and she was out of town, so LVN A tried to call Guardian B and he did not answer, so she called 911. LVN A stated she called because Resident #1 had grabbed an ink pen and started carving her arm and the police were right there. LVN A stated she told Resident #1 to stop, and she did. LVN A stated there was no injury. LVN A stated she did not see LVN B flip off Resident #1 or curse at her or tell her she was not wanted anywhere. In an interview on 5/18/25 at 6:48pm with CNA D, she stated that on 5/4/25, Resident #1 was frustrated and agitated, was trying to get out of the facility, and was on 1:1. CNA D stated the police had been called and LVN B said to Resident #1, you are here because your [family member] can't deal with you and you need to go to jail. Resident #1 said shut up, bitch and flipped off LVN B. LVN B flipped off Resident #1 and said, I can do it too. Resident #1 called LVN B a bitch and LVN B said, you need to go to jail and need to go to a mental hospital to Resident #1. CNA D stated Resident #1 said, shut up bitch, I'm gonna punch you and LVN B said, come on and punch me and I want you to punch me and CNA D stated she got up and tried to redirect Resident #1 and LVN B kept talking trash to Resident #1. CNA D stated she thought other nurses would have reported. CNA D stated she had been trained on abuse and neglect and she should have reported to the DON immediately because the DON was the Abuse coordinator and failure to report would not happen again. In an interview on 5/18/25 at 7:05pm with CNA C, she stated LVN B was agitating Resident #1 and told Resident #1 she needed to go to jail, and her [family member] dropped her off because nobody wanted her. CNA C stated Resident #1 got upset and said, shut up bitch and flipped off LVN B and LVN B kept going and flipped her off back. CNA C stated she could not believe this was happening right in front of the cops. CNA C stated Resident #1 went after LVN B and the aides intervened, and the cops didn't do anything. CNA C stated she thought the police would do something and take care of it. CNA C stated she came into work the next day to report it to the DON, but she was not there and then CNA C was off for a couple of days and time just went by. CNA C stated she did not report the incident because she thought others would and she should have reported it herself immediately. CNA C stated she had been trained on abuse and neglect and she should report to the DON, the abuse coordinator. CNA C stated she feels she can report to the DON and has in the past. In an interview on 5/19/25 at 12:24pm with Guardian A, she stated she did not want this writer to speak to Resident #1 as there were no current effects, but Guardian A did not want to upset Resident #1 and cause behaviors. Guardian A stated Resident #1 did tell her after discharge from the facility that a nurse flipped her off and told her they wanted her to go to jail. Resident #1 told Guardian A that the police saw the nurse do it. In an interview on 5/19/25 at 12:56pm with the ADON, she stated that all staff had been trained on abuse and neglect. The ADON stated all staff had been trained on what abuse would look like and who to report to. The ADON stated that they should report to the DON, abuse coordinator. The ADON stated she was not aware and had not heard anything about LVN B being abusive. The ADON stated what she had been told was that Resident #1 was throwing computers and laptops and swinging at nurses. The ADON stated she was told that by LVN A and LVN B. The ADON stated she spoke with the DON about it and the DON told the ADON she had went and checked on Resident #1 the next morning and she was fine and did not report anything. The ADON stated Guardian B requested Resident #1 be sent to the state hospital. The ADON stated LVN B would be terminated, and CNA C and CNA D were placed on final warning for not reporting it. In an interview on 5/19/25 at 4:54pm with LVN B, she stated Resident #1 was trying to get at patients and knocking things off the nurse's station and was psycho and 300 pounds. LVN B stated [Resident #1] was supposed to be on 1:1 in her room for suicide watch and coming to the front agitating other patients. LVN B stated, Resident #1 was [AGE] years old acting like a smart ass and would not mind staff. LVN B stated she was passing medications, parked her cart, and Resident #1 threw her the finger and LVN B did the same thing back. LVN B stated that Resident #1 needed to be in a mental institution and the facility was not appropriate, and staff were just babysitting. LVN B stated she told Resident #1 to go to her room and Resident #1 flipped her off and LVN B could not handle disrespectful children. LVN B stated she did flip off Resident #1 but did not say anything. LVN B stated it was a reaction because Resident #1 was pushing buttons. LVN B then stated she did tell the police they needed to take Resident #1 because she would not calm down. In a follow up interview on 5/20/25 at 12:48pm with the DON, she stated all staff had been trained on abuse and neglect a bunch of times. The DON stated she had her number posted and was the abuse coordinator. The DON stated at the time of the incident with LVN B, the abuse coordinator was the administrator, and the DON was back up abuse coordinator. The DON stated she had never heard of, and no one reported abuse from LVN B to Resident #1. The DON stated she had started 1:1 training with each staff member to prevent this in the future. The DON stated staff failed to report and she had retrained, counseled, and wrote up the staff that failed to report. The DON stated LVN B was suspended as soon as this writer informed DON about allegation, and LVN B was now terminated. LVN B worked approximately 10 shifts between 05/04/2025 and 05/18/2025. In an interview on 6/3/25 at 3:35pm with LVN C, she stated she was on another hall, and walked up to the nurse's station. LVN C stated she saw Resident #1 yelling at LVN B and LVN B was yelling back at her. LVN C stated she was attending to the other residents and LVN B was talking to Resident #1 about how she hated taking care of residents like her and stuff like that, something to that affect. LVN C stated LVN B did say Resident #1 needed to go to jail. LVN B said Resident #1's [family member] dropped her at the facility because she couldn't handle her. LVN C stated she did not see LVN B flip off Resident #1. LVN C stated, it was verbal abuse. LVN C stated she was going to report to the DON, but LVN A, the night nurse, was on the phone with her at that time, right after the incident, and she said, yes I'm talking to her right now. So, LVN C stated she didn't and thought LVN A reported it. LVN C stated LVN A said she was on the phone with the DON after the incident, but she did not know what she reported. LVN C stated she was covering the shift and was late to her shift because she got called in and never worked the night shift before. LVN C stated she said to LVN A, you got this, you are reporting it and LVN A said yes, she was talking to the DON right then. LVN C stated she went back to passing meds. In a follow up interview on 6/3/25 at 4:11pm with the DON, she stated LVN A did call her that night at 7:24pm and said Resident #1 was having behaviors, throwing things at the nurse's station, and grabbing pens and the cops were there. The DON advised LVN A to call the [family member] because the cops would not take Resident #1 but maybe they would calm her. The DON said LVN A never told her about LVN B, and LVN B was never even mentioned, and she wasn't even the patients nurse, so the DON did not think to ask anything about that. The DON stated she went to see Resident #1 the next morning and checked on her first thing that morning and Resident #1 never told the DON that happened either. In an interview on 6/4/25 at 8:40am with CNA E, she stated she was Resident #1's 1:1 on the evening of the incident and it was her first time working with Resident #1. Resident #1 was throwing everything, books, and pens off the nurse's station. Resident #1 would be yelling, and she called CNA E a bitch for following her and she said she didn't need a 1:1. CNA E stated other residents did see, maybe 2 or 3 residents at the nurse's station. They were staring at Resident #1, and one lady said we (staff) needed to call the cops. CNA E stated she did not see Resident #1 try to hurt herself. CNA E stated Resident #1 went outside because she did not want to be there at the facility. CNA E stated there were CNAs, residents, and nurses around during the incident. CNA E stated Resident #1 was calling LVN B a bitch and flipped her off. She stated LVN B flipped her off back, Resident #1 tried to hit LVN B, and another aide got in between them. CNA E stated she had moved back so she did not see everything. She stated the cops calmed Resident #1 down. Then CNA D stepped in between them. CNA E stated she heard LVN B say, I can do that too and flipped off Resident #1. LVN B told Resident #1 to go to her room. CNA E stated she should have reported, but there was a lot going on and a lot of people involved so she thought they would report because she felt they had a better account of the situation. In an interview on 6/4/25 at 4:15pm with the DON and the ADM when shown the body cam footage, the ADM stated it was abuse and feels staff thought LVN A reported and that was why they didn't report. The DON stated it was abuse and she feels all staff felt the others would report. The DON stated she did get a report from LVN A, but it was only what she saw and not all of what happened or what LVN B did. In an interview on 6/5/25 at 12:12pm with Resident #11, he stated he had not seen any staff be rude or rough to any resident. Resident #11 stated Resident #1 was very upset. Staff calmed her down. Resident #11 stated he wheeled by the nurse's station, and Resident #1 was cursing and upset. Police were there and they took her back to her room and she calmed down. Resident #11 stated he didn't see the nurse flip her off. Resident #11 stated he had never seen staff do or say anything like that. He stated he had no concerns about his care at the facility. In an interview on 6/5/25 at 12:22pm with Resident #12, he shook his head no when asked if he had ever seen staff be rude or rough with a resident. Resident #12 shook his yes when asked if he remembers the incident. Resident shook his head no, when asked if he saw the nurse be rude or say mean things to the resident. Resident shook his head no, when asked if he saw the nurse flip off the resident. Shook his head yes when asked if he felt safe. Resident #12 shook his head yes when asked if he felt staff acted appropriately. Resident #12 shook his head yes when asked if he felt staff acted quickly to keep everyone safe. Shook his head no, when asked if anyone was hurt. Resident #12 shook his head yes when asked if he was removed from the incident. In an interview on 6/5/25 at 12:33pm with Resident #13, she stated she remembered the incident. Resident #13 stated that staff were trying to get something Resident #1 had taken and Resident #1 got mean. She stated Resident #1 was cursing and throwing things. Resident #13 stated she did not see the nurse say anything rude or flip off Resident #1. Resident #13 stated she felt safe, staff took care of it, and the police came. In an interview on 6/5/25 at 1:30pm with CNA F, she stated she came out of the break room to prepare to do a round and saw Resident #1 trying to get at LVN B. She stated she saw staff got in between Resident #1 and LVN B and cops calmed her down. CNA F stated then the police left, and Resident #1 started throwing things and going after LVN B again. CNA F stated she got in between them. CNA F stated the cops came back in and they stayed for a couple of hours, and they got Resident #1 to calm and then they left. CNA F stated LVN B made comments about how the police needed to take Resident #1 and she would not calm, and she would keep doing this. CNA F stated she did not see her flip off Resident #1. CNA F stated she did here LVN B tell her multiple times she needed to go to her room. CNA F stated she did not hear abuse but did feel LVN B was agitating Resident #1. Resident #1 was very disruptive and agitated and was throwing things and staff, including CNA F removed the other residents from the area the second time the police came in and we removed the residents for their safety. CNA F stated staff didn't remove the other residents the first time when Resident #1 was just saying she would hurt LVN B. CNA F stated she did hear about LVN B flipping off Resident #1 after LVN B had been fired. Record review of LVN B employee file revealed Abuse and Neglect training on 8/7/24. Record review of In-Service Training Report dated 4/3/25 revealed LVN A, LVN B, CNA C, and CNA D had been trained on abuse and neglect. Record review of the facility's Abuse Prohibition Policy dated 5/17/2024, revealed Each resident has the right to be free from abuse, mistreatment, neglect, corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, and financial abuse.Verbal Abuse is defined as the use of, oral, written, or gestured language that willfully includes disparaging or derogatory terms to residents or their families, or within their hearing distance regardless of their age, ability to comprehend, or disability. Record review of Resident Rights policy dated 4/2017 revealed .Residents shall .b. be treated as individuals in a manner that supports their dignity .g. Be free from mental, emotional, and physical abuse and neglect . On 6/04/25 at 2:09pm, an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified. The ADM was notified. The ADM was provided with the IJ template, and a Plan of Removal (POR) was requested at that time. The following Plan of Removal was submitted by the facility and accepted on 06/05/25 at 4:35 pm and included: Social worker, or designee made life satisfaction rounds to residents that can be interviewed to ensure free from abuse and neglect. Staff caring for residents who are unable to be interviewed have been interviewed for any noted changes in residents' behavior. Any abuse or neglect identified will be immediately reported to the abuse coordinator and then HHSC by who ever witnessed or heard about the incident. Completed 6/5/2025.No findings of abuse reported. Administrator trained and is initiating the implementation of Neighbor rounds completing assessments on their residents for potential abuse on 6/5/2025. This will be completed daily by the leadership team during the week and Manager on Duty on weekends. Neighbor rounds are reported daily to the IDT team and will be reviewed during monthly QAPI meeting. This systemic change will ensure that all residents, whether they are able to be interviewed or not, are free from abuse. On May 18, 2025, LVN B was suspended pending the outcome of the investigation. Upon completion of the investigation, LVN B was terminated May 21,2025. On May 19, 2025, Corporate Clinical specialist in-serviced DON regarding Abuse and Neglect policies and procedures, with emphasis on definition of verbal abuse and different scenarios. Competency was verified by a quiz. DON in-serviced staff regarding Abuse and Neglect policies and procedures, with emphasis on definition of verbal abuse and scenario example discussed. Competency was verified with a quiz. Staff will not be allowed to work until they have passed the quiz. Verbal abuse quiz and in-service will be added to the new hire abuse training. Staff were trained over Approaches, Activities and Interventions in Response to Behaviors of people with Mental Health or Psychiatric Needs including how to manage different behaviors, deescalating the situation, removing aggressive resident from the area where other residents may be present or removing the other residents from the area of situation, and to immediately report incident to facility Abuse Coordinator. Completed 6/5/2025. Peer interviews over knowledge of facility's Abuse and Neglect Policy and Procedures, will be conducted weekly, with no less than 10 staff members, by Social Worker, and/or designee for 8 weeks. Following 8 weeks follow up, monthly Peer Interviews will be conducted by Social Worker and/or designee. The abuse coordinator, or designee, shall be responsible for monitoring this corrective action. Any negative findings will be reported to the facility's QA committee for review and corrective action. Completed 6/5/25. Monitoring of the Plan of Removal from 6/05/25 - 6/06/25 included the following: Record review of Inservice dated 6/5/25 with leadership team of 12 staff for neighbor rounds revealed staff are to assess residents for changes in behavior/mood; auditing/asking staff about any signs of abuse and whether sexual, physical, or verbal abuse. In an interview on 6/5/25 at 5:56pm with the ADON, she stated the SW interviewed her on abuse and what she should do to check her knowledge. The ADON stated she had been trained on neighbor rounds. She stated staff will be dividing certain hallways, certain rooms, and do morning rounds. The ADON stated staff would talk to those residents and assess for any issue. She stated staff would see if they had any issues or concerns, and address the concerns, and bring to the morning IDT meetings. The ADON stated staff also did a drill on how to clear the room of other residents, keep everyone safe, and how to approach and deescalate a resident that is aggressive or displaying behaviors. The ADON stated the facility Inserviced all staff on abuse & neglect, reiterated differences and examples of each, and who to report to and when. The ADON stated the DON was going to randomly audit staff on their training. In an interview on 6/5/25 at 6:15pm with SW, she stated she had completed resident and staff interviews regarding abuse and specifically verbal abuse and staff interviews going forward and upping the neighbor rounds program. SW stated she was to round on the second half of A hall every morning and check with residents to see how things are going. She stated she was to see if residents are well and check environmentally and if they have concerns write grievances for that, The SW stated staff are to build rapport to find the abuse if it was happening. The SW stated she had completed life satisfaction rounds and found no concerns of abuse. In an interview on 6/6/25 at 10:35 am with the Administrator and the DON, the ADM stated this day was the first day for Neighbor rounds. The ADM stated staff are assigned rooms and report on the rooms daily (no one has more than 6 rooms each), utilizing a check list. The ADM provided the checklist to the investigator. The DON stated this day was the first day. It went well, and no issues of abuse or neglect was identified. The ADM stated the rounds sheets are reviewed in the morning round each morning daily. The ADM stated on the weekend, the Manager on Duty completes the review of the sheets and reports to the Administrator directly if there is a concern. In an observation on 6/6/25 at 10:35am observed the checklist with staff to use for Neighbor rounds. Record review of Neighbor round observations for 6/6/25 at 10:54 am. All rooms and residents were observed in facility. No concerns regarding abuse and neglect identified. In an interview on 6/6/25 at 11:03 am with Resident # 15, she stated this morning a staff told her she was her neighbor and would be checking on her every day. Resident #15 stated she feels safe and had no concerns with care. In an interview on 6/6/25 at 11:08 am with Resident #16, she stated staff told her this morning that she was her neighbor and would be checking on her every day. Resident #16 stated she feels safe and had no concerns with care. In an interview on 6/6/25 at 11:09 am with Resident #17, she stated a staff told her this morning that she was her neighbor and would be checking on her every day. Resident #17 stated she feels safe a[TRUNCATED]
CRITICAL (K) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Abuse Prevention Policies (Tag F0607)

Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement written policies and procedures that prohib...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, for 1 (Resident #1) of 16 residents reviewed. As a result of the failure to implement the facility policy, the resident was not free from abuse, staff did not report the abuse, residents were not protected from further abuse, and the facility administration was unaware of the verbal abuse and police intervention on 05/04/2025 between LVN B and Resident #1 until surveyor intervention on 05/18/2025 This failure resulted in the identification of Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 6/04/25 at 2:09 pm. While the immediacy was removed on 6/06/25 at 1:02 pm, the facility remained out of compliance at scope of pattern and severity no actual harm due to the facility's need to monitor the implementation of the plan of removal. This failure could place the residents at risk of not being free of abuse. Findings included: Record review of the facility's Abuse Prohibition Policy dated 5/17/2024, revealed Each resident has the right to be free from abuse, mistreatment, neglect, corporal punishment, involuntary seclusion, and financial abuse.Verbal Abuse is defined as the use of, oral, written, or gestured language that willfully includes disparaging or derogatory terms to residents or their families, or within their hearing distance regardless of their age, ability to comprehend, or disability. Record review of Resident #1's electronic health record revealed a [AGE] year-old female, admission date 4/30/25. Her diagnoses included: Autistic Disorder (neurodevelopmental disorder with difficulties in social interaction and social communication), Fetal Alcohol Syndrome (life-long physical, cognitive, and behavioral issues), long-term drug therapy, epilepsy (seizure disorder), tachycardia (rapid heart rate). Resident discharged from the facility on 05/05/2025. Record review of police report dated 5/4/25 at 6:59pm revealed When [Police officer] arrived, [Police officer] made contact with the reporting party, [LVN A], she stated they received a new patient [Resident #1] approximately 2 days ago. [LVN A] stated [Resident #1] was a psych patient who had been having a hard time adjusting to the facility. [LVN A] requested that [Police officer] speak with [Resident #1] to see if she met criteria to be assessed by [LIDDA] for a psych evaluation. [Police officer] made contact with [Resident #1] at the nurse's station, [Resident #1] was very upset at the time and was refusing to speak with [Police officer]. While [Police officer] was speaking to [Resident #1] in an attempt to build a rapport [LVN B] began walking towards the nurse's station. When [LVN B] approached the area, she began making statements like, Y'all need to take her ass somewhere. and Her [family member] needs to come get her! [LVN B] was very agitated and extremely rude. [Police officer] began asking [LVN B] for more background information on [Resident #1] because she did not speak to me. [LVN B] stated She is trying her crap. after she stated this [Resident #1] yelled at [LVN B] to shut up. [LVN B] stated, You don't scare me none, you might your [family member] but not me. I began explaining to [LVN B] our criteria and that I would not just be able to take her. [LVN B] began talking and said, Well then she needs to go to her room because she is one on one. [Resident #1] then yelled, I don't have to if I don't fucking want to! [LVN B] then turned to [Resident #1] pointed at her and yelled very angrily Go to your room! and then held her middle finger up towards [Resident #1]. That was when [Resident #1] stated I can punch you! and [LVN B] turned to [Resident #1] and waved her fingers as if inviting her over and stated, Come on! [Resident #1] stood aggressively and began walking towards [LVN B]. An aide and I stood between the two to keep things from escalating. [LVN B] stated She needs to go to jail mam! she then stated, Her [family member] dropped her here because she can't take care of her. another nurse stated neither of [Resident #1's] [family members] was answering the phone and [LVN B's] response was They don't want to have anything to do with her. [Resident #1] responded Shut up! and [LVN B] replied, Just telling the truth honey. This upset [Resident #1] to the point where she wanted to hurt [LVN B]. An aide and I continued following [Resident #1] and trying to keep her calm and away from [LVN B]. I was finally able to get [Resident #1] to separate and have a seat in the living area of the facility .[Police officer] contacted crisis line to see if she could be assessed by [LIDDA] .[LIDDA] came to the facility for the assessment and put in a referral to [Behavioral health hospital] and was denied due to [Resident #1's] IQ. LIDDA attempted an emergency detention order to the state hospital, and they refused the order. Officers remained until [Resident #1] was in bed and no longer a threat to the staff. Observation of body cam footage from police officer dated 5/4/25 from 7:12pm-7:19pm revealed the Police officer entered the building of the facility and went to the nurse's station and asked for the nurse that called and was directed down the hall to LVN A at her med cart. LVN A stated Resident #1 is a psych patient and need to see about an evaluation. LVN A pointed towards the nurse's station and stated the Police Officer could ask and aide where Resident #1 is. The Police officer walked to the nurse's station and CNA E showed Police officer who Resdient #1 was. Resident #1 was sitting in chair against the wall at the nurse's station quiet and looking around shaking her left leg and 1:1 aide (CNA E) was three chairs down from resident. Three residents sitting in chairs next to resident. Police officer attempted to speak to Resident #1, and she would not speak to the police officer. Resident #1 stated shut up to someone behind the police officer not seen on camera. Police officer turned around and LVN B wheeled her cart to the nurse's station and stated to the police officer, She's trying her crap & she needs to go to jail and Resident #1 stated shut up, shut up. LVN B stated, Don't scare me none, might your [family member] but not me. The police officer attempted to explain to LVN B that she can't just take her, and Resident #1 is not speaking to her. LVN B stated, she needs to go to her room, she's 1:1 and looks towards Resident #1. Resident #1 said, I don't have to if I don't fucking want to. LVN B stated, you need to go to your room loudly towards Resident #1 (Resident #1 not in camera view). LVN B flips Resident #1 off and states, I can do it too and Resident #1 stated, I can punch you and LVN B stated, come on and waved her fingers gesturing towards her to come, you punch me you're going to jail as Resident #1 is seen getting up and walking towards LVN B. Police officer says uh-uh and CNA D puts herself between LVN B and Resident #1. LVN B no longer in camera view. Resident #1 stated I don't care and Police officer tells her to go sit down. LVN B stated, she needs to go to jail ma'am, her [family member] left her here because she can't take care of her. They don't want to have anything to do with her. Resident #1 stated shut up and appeared to be tearing up. LVN B said, just telling the truth honey. CNA D stated, let's go for a walk, want to go for a walk with me and Resident #1 states, No, I want to punch that bitch. CNA D and Police officer said no, we are not doing that, and we have to respect our elders. CNA D stated again, want to go for a walk and LVN B (no longer in camera view) stated she's not to be out of her room for one thing. Resident #1 stated, yes I can and LVN B stated, she's on 1:1. CNA D encouraged Resident #1 to practice breathing. Resident #1 looks at her watch and a sound from watch played and Police officer stated, that's you [family member] right there. Resident #1 stated, I don't care. Police officer said, you don't want to talk to your [family member]? Resident #1 pulled a pen out of her left shorts pocket and stated, I wanna stab that bitch and CNA D stated, let's go on a walk, let's remove ourselves from the situation and we don't have to be ugly let's remove and go on a walk and calm down. We don't need to do the extra stuff. Resident #1 started walking towards the entrance of the nurse's station and CNA D walked with her and LVN C is seen at a med cart on the computer. Police and CNA D walk with Resident #1. CNA D put herself in the entry and police asked if she wanted to go walk with CNA D and Resident #1 said No and police said, we are not going over there with her and touched Resident #1's arm. Resident #1 shook police officer off and said move. The police officer said, back up, you're not going over there. Resident #1 tried to walk around CNA D and CNA D said [Resident #1], I'm not letting you in there, we can go for a walk, we can remove ourselves but that is not happening and Resident #1 stopped and stood still. Someone unknown stated, she's not supposed to be out here and Resident #1 stated yes I can. CNA D stated Let's go for a walk. LVN A is heard explaining Resident #1's actions to someone. The police officer asked Resident #1 if she wants to go outside, and she said no. CNA D stated I need you to back up, you are in my bubble and Resident #1 stepped back. CNA D thanked her. Someone from the nurse's station attempted to give Resident #1 the phone and CNA D stated your [family member] wants to talk to you. Resident #1 hung up the phone. The police officer stated How can we help you if you won't talk to anybody. We are here to help you. CNA D asked Resident #1 if she wants to go get a soda and Resident #1 shook her head no. LVN A asked CNA D she hung up? and CNA D said, oh yeah she hung up the phone. Resident #1 starts walking away. End video. In an interview on 5/18/25 at 10:45 am with the Police Officer, she stated she went out to the facility for a call for a welfare check on Resident #1 by LVN A. Resident #1 was very upset, and the Police officer got her to calm down. The Police officer stated that LVN B told the Police Officer she needed to take her [Resident #1] ass to jail. Resident #1 was right there so she heard LVN B. LVN B stated Resident #1's [family member] needed to come get her and Resident #1 needed to be in her room on 1:1. The Police officer stated Resident #1 stated she did not have to be in her room and LVN B flipped off Resident #1 and Resident #1 flipped off LVN B and then LVN B stated that's why nobody wants you. That's why she (family member) dropped you off to Resident #1. The police officer stated that Resident #1 said she was going to hit LVN B and LVN B said, do it. The Police officer said she got in between them and there were lots of staff around and nobody removed LVN B. The Police Officer stated it was not against the law, there was no immediate threat for Resident #1, and she had another nurse, and the police de-escalate the situation, so it was not enough to take LVN B in. LVN A was the nurse that called 911 to come check on Resident #1. In an interview on 5/18/25 at 1:30pm with DON, the DON stated she had never been told about the incident with LVN B by anyone until right then. Resident #1 was trying to hurt herself while she was at the facility and was there for 5 days, and was never without staff supervision. The DON stated she was never told about LVN B acting that way and would report it now and start an investigation now. She would have reported it at the time had she been made aware. The DON stated the Administrator, at the time, was no longer there. The DON stated he was the abuse coordinator and DON was the backup abuse coordinator at that time. In an interview on 5/18/25 at 5:50pm with LVN A, she stated she spoke with the police and witnessed Resident #1 trying to get at LVN B, but she did not know what initiated it. LVN A stated the aides prevented Resident #1 from getting LVN B so Resident #1 started throwing things down the hall. LVN A stated Resident #1 did calm down, went back to her room with her 1:1 staff, and went to sleep. LVN A stated she called Guardian A, and she was out of town, so LVN A tried to call Guardian B and he did not answer, so she called 911. LVN A stated she called because Resident #1 had grabbed an ink pen and started carving her arm and the police were right there. LVN A stated she told Resident #1 to stop, and she did. LVN A stated there was no injury. LVN A stated she did not see LVN B flip off Resident #1 or curse at her or tell her she was not wanted anywhere. In an interview on 5/18/25 at 6:48pm with CNA D, she stated that on 5/4/25, Resident #1 was frustrated and agitated, was trying to get out of the facility, and was on 1:1. CNA D stated the police had been called and LVN B said to Resident #1, you are here because your [family member] can't deal with you and you need to go to jail. Resident #1 said shut up, bitch and flipped off LVN B. LVN B flipped off Resident #1 and said, I can do it too. Resident #1 called LVN B a bitch and LVN B said, you need to go to jail and need to go to a mental hospital to Resident #1. CNA D stated Resident #1 said, shut up bitch, I'm gonna punch you and LVN B said, come on and punch me and I want you to punch me and CNA D stated she got up and tried to redirect Resident #1 and LVN B kept talking trash to Resident #1. CNA D stated she thought other nurses would have reported. CNA D stated she had been trained on abuse and neglect and she should have reported to the DON immediately because the DON was the Abuse coordinator and failure to report would not happen again. In an interview on 5/18/25 at 7:05pm with CNA C, she stated LVN B was agitating Resident #1 and told Resident #1 she needed to go to jail, and her [family member] dropped her off because nobody wanted her. CNA C stated Resident #1 got upset and said, shut up bitch and flipped off LVN B and LVN B kept going and flipped her off back. CNA C stated she could not believe this was happening right in front of the cops. CNA C stated Resident #1 went after LVN B and the aides intervened, and the cops didn't do anything. CNA C stated she thought the police would do something and take care of it. CNA C stated she came into work the next day to report it to the DON, but she was not there and then CNA C was off for a couple of days and time just went by. CNA C stated she did not report the incident because she thought others would and she should have reported it herself immediately. CNA C stated she had been trained on abuse and neglect and she should report to the DON, the abuse coordinator. CNA C stated she feels she can report to the DON and has in the past. In an interview on 5/19/25 at 12:24pm with Guardian A, she stated she did not want this writer to speak to Resident #1 as there were no current effects, but Guardian A did not want to upset Resident #1 and cause behaviors. Guardian A stated Resident #1 did tell her after discharge from the facility that a nurse flipped her off and told her they wanted her to go to jail. Resident #1 told Guardian A that the police saw the nurse do it. In an interview on 5/19/25 at 12:56pm with the ADON, she stated that all staff had been trained on abuse and neglect. The ADON stated all staff had been trained on what abuse would look like and who to report to. The ADON stated that they should report to the DON, abuse coordinator. The ADON stated she was not aware and had not heard anything about LVN B being abusive. The ADON stated what she had been told was that Resident #1 was throwing computers and laptops and swinging at nurses. The ADON stated she was told that by LVN A and LVN B. The ADON stated she spoke with the DON about it and the DON told the ADON she had went and checked on Resident #1 the next morning and she was fine and did not report anything. The ADON stated Guardian B requested Resident #1 be sent to the state hospital. The ADON stated LVN B would be terminated, and CNA C and CNA D were placed on final warning for not reporting it. In an interview on 5/19/25 at 4:54pm with LVN B, she stated Resident #1 was trying to get at patients and knocking things off the nurse's station and was psycho and 300 pounds. LVN B stated [Resident #1] was supposed to be on 1:1 in her room for suicide watch and coming to the front agitating other patients. LVN B stated, Resident #1 was [AGE] years old acting like a smart ass and would not mind staff. LVN B stated she was passing medications, parked her cart, and Resident #1 threw her the finger and LVN B did the same thing back. LVN B stated that Resident #1 needed to be in a mental institution and the facility was not appropriate, and staff were just babysitting. LVN B stated she told Resident #1 to go to her room and Resident #1 flipped her off and LVN B could not handle disrespectful children. LVN B stated she did flip off Resident #1 but did not say anything. LVN B stated it was a reaction because Resident #1 was pushing buttons. LVN B then stated she did tell the police they needed to take Resident #1 because she would not calm down. In a follow up interview on 5/20/25 at 12:48pm with the DON, she stated all staff had been trained on abuse and neglect a bunch of times. The DON stated she had her number posted and was the abuse coordinator. The DON stated at the time of the incident with LVN B, the abuse coordinator was the administrator, and the DON was back up abuse coordinator. The DON stated she had never heard of, and no one reported abuse from LVN B to Resident #1. The DON stated she had started 1:1 training with each staff member to prevent this in the future. The DON stated staff failed to report and she had retrained, counseled, and wrote up the staff that failed to report. The DON stated LVN B was suspended as soon as this writer informed DON about allegation, and LVN B was now terminated. LVN B worked approximately 10 shifts between 05/04/2025 and 05/18/2025. In an interview on 6/3/25 at 3:35pm with LVN C, she stated she was on another hall, and walked up to the nurse's station. LVN C stated she saw Resident #1 yelling at LVN B and LVN B was yelling back at her. LVN C stated she was attending to the other residents and LVN B was talking to Resident #1 about how she hated taking care of residents like her and stuff like that, something to that affect. LVN C stated LVN B did say Resident #1 needed to go to jail. LVN B said Resident #1's [family member] dropped her at the facility because she couldn't handle her. LVN C stated she did not see LVN B flip off Resident #1. LVN C stated, it was verbal abuse. LVN C stated she was going to report to the DON, but LVN A, the night nurse, was on the phone with her at that time, right after the incident, and she said, yes I'm talking to her right now. So, LVN C stated she didn't and thought LVN A reported it. LVN C stated LVN A said she was on the phone with the DON after the incident, but she did not know what she reported. LVN C stated she was covering the shift and was late to her shift because she got called in and never worked the night shift before. LVN C stated she said to LVN A, you got this, you are reporting it and LVN A said yes, she was talking to the DON right then. LVN C stated she went back to passing meds. In a follow up interview on 6/3/25 at 4:11pm with the DON, she stated LVN A did call her that night at 7:24pm and said Resident #1 was having behaviors, throwing things at the nurse's station, and grabbing pens and the cops were there. The DON advised LVN A to call the [family member] because the cops would not take Resident #1 but maybe they would calm her. The DON said LVN A never told her about LVN B, and LVN B was never even mentioned, and she wasn't even the patients nurse, so the DON did not think to ask anything about that. The DON stated she went to see Resident #1 the next morning and checked on her first thing that morning and Resident #1 never told the DON that happened either. In an interview on 6/4/25 at 8:40am with CNA E, she stated she was Resident #1's 1:1 on the evening of the incident and it was her first time working with Resident #1. Resident #1 was throwing everything, books, and pens off the nurse's station. Resident #1 would be yelling, and she called CNA E a bitch for following her and she said she didn't need a 1:1. CNA E stated other residents did see, maybe 2 or 3 residents at the nurse's station. They were staring at Resident #1, and one lady said we (staff) needed to call the cops. CNA E stated she did not see Resident #1 try to hurt herself. CNA E stated Resident #1 went outside because she did not want to be there at the facility. CNA E stated there were CNAs, residents, and nurses around during the incident. CNA E stated Resident #1 was calling LVN B a bitch and flipped her off. She stated LVN B flipped her off back, Resident #1 tried to hit LVN B, and another aide got in between them. CNA E stated she had moved back so she did not see everything. She stated the cops calmed Resident #1 down. Then CNA D stepped in between them. CNA E stated she heard LVN B say, I can do that too and flipped off Resident #1. LVN B told Resident #1 to go to her room. CNA E stated she should have reported, but there was a lot going on and a lot of people involved so she thought they would report because she felt they had a better account of the situation. In an interview on 6/4/25 at 4:15pm with the DON and the ADM when shown the body cam footage, the ADM stated it was abuse and feels staff thought LVN A reported and that was why they didn't report. The DON stated it was abuse and she feels all staff felt the others would report. The DON stated she did get a report from LVN A, but it was only what she saw and not all of what happened or what LVN B did. In an interview on 6/5/25 at 12:12pm with Resident #11, he stated he had not seen any staff be rude or rough to any resident. Resident #11 stated Resident #1 was very upset. Staff calmed her down. Resident #11 stated he wheeled by the nurse's station, and Resident #1 was cursing and upset. Police were there and they took her back to her room and she calmed down. Resident #11 stated he didn't see the nurse flip her off. Resident #11 stated he had never seen staff do or say anything like that. He stated he had no concerns about his care at the facility. In an interview on 6/5/25 at 12:22pm with Resident #12, he shook his head no when asked if he had ever seen staff be rude or rough with a resident. Resident #12 shook his yes when asked if he remembers the incident. Resident shook his head no, when asked if he saw the nurse be rude or say mean things to the resident. Resident shook his head no, when asked if he saw the nurse flip off the resident. Shook his head yes when asked if he felt safe. Resident #12 shook his head yes when asked if he felt staff acted appropriately. Resident #12 shook his head yes when asked if he felt staff acted quickly to keep everyone safe. Shook his head no, when asked if anyone was hurt. Resident #12 shook his head yes when asked if he was removed from the incident. In an interview on 6/5/25 at 12:33pm with Resident #13, she stated she remembered the incident. Resident #13 stated that staff were trying to get something Resident #1 had taken and Resident #1 got mean. She stated Resident #1 was cursing and throwing things. Resident #13 stated she did not see the nurse say anything rude or flip off Resident #1. Resident #13 stated she felt safe, staff took care of it, and the police came. In an interview on 6/5/25 at 1:30pm with CNA F, she stated she came out of the break room to prepare to do a round and saw Resident #1 trying to get at LVN B. She stated she saw staff got in between Resident #1 and LVN B and cops calmed her down. CNA F stated then the police left, and Resident #1 started throwing things and going after LVN B again. CNA F stated she got in between them. CNA F stated the cops came back in and they stayed for a couple of hours, and they got Resident #1 to calm and then they left. CNA F stated LVN B made comments about how the police needed to take Resident #1 and she would not calm, and she would keep doing this. CNA F stated she did not see her flip off Resident #1. CNA F stated she did here LVN B tell her multiple times she needed to go to her room. CNA F stated she did not hear abuse but did feel LVN B was agitating Resident #1. Resident #1 was very disruptive and agitated and was throwing things and staff, including CNA F removed the other residents from the area the second time the police came in and we removed the residents for their safety. CNA F stated staff didn't remove the other residents the first time when Resident #1 was just saying she would hurt LVN B. CNA F stated she did hear about LVN B flipping off Resident #1 after LVN B had been fired. Record review of LVN B employee file revealed Abuse and Neglect training on 8/7/24. Record review of In-Service Training Report dated 4/3/25 revealed LVN A, LVN B, CNA C, and CNA D had been trained on abuse and neglect. Record review of Resident Rights policy dated 4/2017 revealed .Residents shall .b. be treated as individuals in a manner that supports their dignity .g. Be free from mental, emotional, and physical abuse and neglect . On 6/04/25 at 2:09pm, an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified. The ADM was notified. The ADM was provided with the IJ template, and a Plan of Removal (POR) was requested at that time. The following Plan of Removal was submitted by the facility and accepted on 06/05/25 at 4:35 pm and included: Social worker, or designee made life satisfaction rounds to residents that can be interviewed to ensure free from abuse and neglect. Staff caring for residents who are unable to be interviewed have been interviewed for any noted changes in residents' behavior. Any abuse or neglect identified will be immediately reported to the abuse coordinator and then HHSC by who ever witnessed or heard about the incident. Completed 6/5/2025.No findings of abuse reported. Administrator trained and is initiating the implementation of Neighbor rounds completing assessments on their residents for potential abuse on 6/5/2025. This will be completed daily by the leadership team during the week and Manager on Duty on weekends. Neighbor rounds are reported daily to the IDT team and will be reviewed during monthly QAPI meeting. This systemic change will ensure that all residents, whether they are able to be interviewed or not, are free from abuse. On May 18, 2025, LVN B was suspended pending the outcome of the investigation. Upon completion of the investigation, LVN B was terminated May 21,2025. On May 19, 2025, Corporate Clinical specialist in-serviced DON regarding Abuse and Neglect policies and procedures, with emphasis on definition of verbal abuse and different scenarios. Competency was verified by a quiz. DON in-serviced staff regarding Abuse and Neglect policies and procedures, with emphasis on definition of verbal abuse and scenario example discussed. Competency was verified with a quiz. Staff will not be allowed to work until they have passed the quiz. Verbal abuse quiz and in-service will be added to the new hire abuse training. Staff were trained over Approaches, Activities and Interventions in Response to Behaviors of people with Mental Health or Psychiatric Needs including how to manage different behaviors, deescalating the situation, removing aggressive resident from the area where other residents may be present or removing the other residents from the area of situation, and to immediately report incident to facility Abuse Coordinator. Completed 6/5/2025. Peer interviews over knowledge of facility's Abuse and Neglect Policy and Procedures, will be conducted weekly, with no less than 10 staff members, by Social Worker, and/or designee for 8 weeks. Following 8 weeks follow up, monthly Peer Interviews will be conducted by Social Worker and/or designee. The abuse coordinator, or designee, shall be responsible for monitoring this corrective action. Any negative findings will be reported to the facility's QA committee for review and corrective action. Completed 6/5/25. Monitoring of the Plan of Removal from 6/05/25 - 6/06/25 included the following: Record review of Inservice dated 6/5/25 with leadership team of 12 staff for neighbor rounds revealed staff are to assess residents for changes in behavior/mood; auditing/asking staff about any signs of abuse and whether sexual, physical, or verbal abuse. In an interview on 6/5/25 at 5:56pm with the ADON, she stated the SW interviewed her on abuse and what she should do to check her knowledge. The ADON stated she had been trained on neighbor rounds. She stated staff will be dividing certain hallways, certain rooms, and do morning rounds. The ADON stated staff would talk to those residents and assess for any issue. She stated staff would see if they had any issues or concerns, and address the concerns, and bring to the morning IDT meetings. The ADON stated staff also did a drill on how to clear the room of other residents, keep everyone safe, and how to approach and deescalate a resident that is aggressive or displaying behaviors. The ADON stated the facility Inserviced all staff on abuse & neglect, reiterated differences and examples of each, and who to report to and when. The ADON stated the DON was going to randomly audit staff on their training. In an interview on 6/5/25 at 6:15pm with SW, she stated she had completed resident and staff interviews regarding abuse and specifically verbal abuse and staff interviews going forward and upping the neighbor rounds program. SW stated she was to round on the second half of A hall every morning and check with residents to see how things are going. She stated she was to see if residents are well and check environmentally and if they have concerns write grievances for that, The SW stated staff are to build rapport to find the abuse if it was happening. The SW stated she had completed life satisfaction rounds and found no concerns of abuse. In an interview on 6/6/25 at 10:35 am with the Administrator and the DON, the ADM stated this day was the first day for Neighbor rounds. The ADM stated staff are assigned rooms and report on the rooms daily (no one has more than 6 rooms each), utilizing a check list. The ADM provided the checklist to the investigator. The DON stated this day was the first day. It went well, and no issues of abuse or neglect was identified. The ADM stated the rounds sheets are reviewed in the morning round each morning daily. The ADM stated on the weekend, the Manager on Duty completes the review of the sheets and reports to the Administrator directly if there is a concern. In an observation on 6/6/25 at 10:35am observed the checklist with staff to use for Neighbor rounds. Record review of Neighbor round observations for 6/6/25 at 10:54 am. All rooms and residents were observed in facility. No concerns regarding abuse and neglect identified. In an interview on 6/6/25 at 11:03 am with Resident # 15, she stated this morning a staff told her she was her neighbor and would be checking on her every day. Resident #15 stated she feels safe and had no concerns with care. In an interview on 6/6/25 at 11:08 am with Resident #16, she stated staff told her this morning that she was her neighbor and would be checking on her every day. Resident #16 stated she feels safe[TRUNCATED]
CRITICAL (K) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to report all allegations of abuse, neglect exploitation ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to report all allegations of abuse, neglect exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, are reported immediately to the administrator of the facility and to other officials in accordance with State law through established procedures for 1 (Resident #1) of 16 residents reviewed. CNA B, CNA C, CNA E, and CNA D failed to report verbal abuse of Resident #1 to the administrator or the DON. There was police intervention between the staff and resident. As a result of not reporting, the administrative staff were not aware until surveyor intervention. Include the incident happened on 5/4/25 and administration were not aware of the verbal abuse until 5/18/25. This failure resulted in the identification of Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 6/04/25 at 2:09 pm. While the immediacy was removed on 6/06/25 at 1:02 pm, the facility remained out of compliance at scope of pattern and severity no actual harm due to the facility's need to monitor the implementation of the plan of removal. This failure could put the residents at risk of compromised protection and oversight, and mental anguish. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's electronic health record revealed a [AGE] year-old female, admission date 4/30/25. Her diagnoses included: Autistic Disorder (neurodevelopmental disorder with difficulties in social interaction and social communication), Fetal Alcohol Syndrome (life-long physical, cognitive, and behavioral issues), long-term drug therapy, epilepsy (seizure disorder), tachycardia (rapid heart rate). Resident was discharged [DATE]. Record review of police report dated 5/4/25 at 6:59pm revealed When [Police officer] arrived, [Police officer] made contact with the reporting party, [LVN A], she stated they received a new patient [Resident #1] approximately 2 days ago. [LVN A] stated [Resident #1] was a psych patient who had been having a hard time adjusting to the facility. [LVN A] requested that [Police officer] speak with [Resident #1] to see if she met criteria to be assessed by [LIDDA] for a psych evaluation. [Police officer] made contact with [Resident #1] at the nurse's station, [Resident #1] was very upset at the time and was refusing to speak with [Police officer]. While [Police officer] was speaking to [Resident #1] in an attempt to build a rapport [LVN B] began walking towards the nurse's station. When [LVN B] approached the area, she began making statements like, Y'all need to take her ass somewhere. and Her [family member] needs to come get her! [LVN B] was very agitated and extremely rude. [Police officer] began asking [LVN B] for more background information on [Resident #1] because she did not speak to me. [LVN B] stated She is trying her crap. after she stated this [Resident #1] yelled at [LVN B] to shut up. [LVN B] stated, You don't scare me none, you might your [family member] but not me. I began explaining to [LVN B] our criteria and that I would not just be able to take her. [LVN B] began talking and said, Well then she needs to go to her room because she is one on one. [Resident #1] then yelled, I don't have to if I don't fucking want to! [LVN B] then turned to [Resident #1] pointed at her and yelled very angrily Go to your room! and then held her middle finger up towards [Resident #1]. That was when [Resident #1] stated I can punch you! and [LVN B] turned to [Resident #1] and waved her fingers as if inviting her over and stated, Come on! [Resident #1] stood aggressively and began walking towards [LVN B]. An aide and I stood between the two to keep things from escalating. [LVN B] stated She needs to go to jail mam! she then stated, Her [family member] dropped her here because she can't take care of her. another nurse stated neither of [Resident #1's] [family members] was answering the phone and [LVN B's] response was They don't want to have anything to do with her. [Resident #1] responded Shut up! and [LVN B] replied, Just telling the truth honey. This upset [Resident #1] to the point where she wanted to hurt [LVN B]. An aide and I continued following [Resident #1] and trying to keep her calm and away from [LVN B]. I was finally able to get [Resident #1] to separate and have a seat in the living area of the facility .[Police officer] contacted crisis line to see if she could be assessed by [LIDDA] .[LIDDA] came to the facility for the assessment and put in a referral to [Behavioral health hospital] and was denied due to [Resident #1's] IQ. LIDDA attempted an emergency detention order to the state hospital, and they refused the order. Officers remained until [Resident #1] was in bed and no longer a threat to the staff. Observation of body cam footage from police officer dated 5/4/25 from 7:12pm-7:19pm revealed the Police officer entered the building of the facility and went to the nurse's station and asked for the nurse that called and was directed down the hall to LVN A at her med cart. LVN A stated Resident #1 is a psych patient and need to see about an evaluation. LVN A pointed towards the nurse's station and stated the Police Officer could ask and aide where Resident #1 is. The Police officer walked to the nurse's station and CNA E showed Police officer who Resdient #1 was. Resident #1 was sitting in chair against the wall at the nurse's station quiet and looking around shaking her left leg and 1:1 aide (CNA E) was three chairs down from resident. Three residents sitting in chairs next to resident. Police officer attempted to speak to Resident #1, and she would not speak to the police officer. Resident #1 stated shut up to someone behind the police officer not seen on camera. Police officer turned around and LVN B wheeled her cart to the nurse's station and stated to the police officer, She's trying her crap & she needs to go to jail and Resident #1 stated shut up, shut up. LVN B stated, Don't scare me none, might your [family member] but not me. The police officer attempted to explain to LVN B that she can't just take her, and Resident #1 is not speaking to her. LVN B stated, she needs to go to her room, she's 1:1 and looks towards Resident #1. Resident #1 said, I don't have to if I don't fucking want to. LVN B stated, you need to go to your room loudly towards Resident #1 (Resident #1 not in camera view). LVN B flips Resident #1 off and states, I can do it too and Resident #1 stated, I can punch you and LVN B stated, come on and waved her fingers gesturing towards her to come, you punch me you're going to jail as Resident #1 is seen getting up and walking towards LVN B. Police officer says uh-uh and CNA D puts herself between LVN B and Resident #1. LVN B no longer in camera view. Resident #1 stated I don't care and Police officer tells her to go sit down. LVN B stated, she needs to go to jail ma'am, her [family member] left her here because she can't take care of her. They don't want to have anything to do with her. Resident #1 stated shut up and appeared to be tearing up. LVN B said, just telling the truth honey. CNA D stated, let's go for a walk, want to go for a walk with me and Resident #1 states, No, I want to punch that bitch. CNA D and Police officer said no, we are not doing that, and we have to respect our elders. CNA D stated again, want to go for a walk and LVN B (no longer in camera view) stated she's not to be out of her room for one thing. Resident #1 stated, yes I can and LVN B stated, she's on 1:1. CNA D encouraged Resident #1 to practice breathing. Resident #1 looks at her watch and a sound from watch played and Police officer stated, that's you [family member] right there. Resident #1 stated, I don't care. Police officer said, you don't want to talk to your [family member]? Resident #1 pulled a pen out of her left shorts pocket and stated, I wanna stab that bitch and CNA D stated, let's go on a walk, let's remove ourselves from the situation and we don't have to be ugly let's remove and go on a walk and calm down. We don't need to do the extra stuff. Resident #1 started walking towards the entrance of the nurse's station and CNA D walked with her and LVN C is seen at a med cart on the computer. Police and CNA D walk with Resident #1. CNA D put herself in the entry and police asked if she wanted to go walk with CNA D and Resident #1 said No and police said, we are not going over there with her and touched Resident #1's arm. Resident #1 shook police officer off and said move. The police officer said, back up, you're not going over there. Resident #1 tried to walk around CNA D and CNA D said [Resident #1], I'm not letting you in there, we can go for a walk, we can remove ourselves but that is not happening and Resident #1 stopped and stood still. Someone unknown stated, she's not supposed to be out here and Resident #1 stated yes I can. CNA D stated Let's go for a walk. LVN A is heard explaining Resident #1's actions to someone. The police officer asked Resident #1 if she wants to go outside, and she said no. CNA D stated I need you to back up, you are in my bubble and Resident #1 stepped back. CNA D thanked her. Someone from the nurse's station attempted to give Resident #1 the phone and CNA D stated your [family member] wants to talk to you. Resident #1 hung up the phone. The police officer stated How can we help you if you won't talk to anybody. We are here to help you. CNA D asked Resident #1 if she wants to go get a soda and Resident #1 shook her head no. LVN A asked CNA D she hung up? and CNA D said, oh yeah she hung up the phone. Resident #1 starts walking away. End video. In an interview on 5/18/25 at 10:45 am with Police Officer, she stated she went out to the facility for a call for a well-fare check on Resident #1. Resident #1 was very upset, and the Police officer got her to calm down. Police officer stated that LVN B told the Police Officer she needed to take her [Resident #1] ass to jail. Resident #1 was right there so she heard LVN B. LVN B stated Resident #1's [family member] needed to come get her and Resident #1 needed to be in her room on 1:1. The Police officer stated Resident #1 stated she did not have to be in her room and LVN B flipped off Resident #1 and Resident #1 flipped off LVN B and then LVN B stated that's why nobody wants you. That's why she [[family member]] dropped you off to Resident #1. The police officer stated that Resident #1 said she was going to hit LVN B and LVN B said, do it. Police officer said she got in between them and there were lots of staff around and nobody removed LVN B. The Police Officer stated it was not against the law and there was no immediate threat for Resident #1, and she had another nurse, and the police de-escalated the situation, so it was not enough to take LVN B in. LVN A was the nurse that called 911 to check on Resident #1. In an interview on 5/18/25 at 1:30pm with DON, The DON stated she had never been told about the incident with LVN B by anyone until right now. Resident #1 was trying to hurt herself while she was here and was here for 5 days and was never without staff supervision. DON stated she was never told about LVN B acting that way and would report it now and start an investigation now. DON stated she would have reported it had she been made aware. DON stated the previous administrator was no longer at the facility and the new administrator starts tomorrow. In an interview on 5/18/25 at 4:20pm with CNA A, she stated she had been trained on abuse and neglect and she would report it to her abuse coordinator which is the administrator or DON. CNA A stated the facility has had some administrator changes so the current abuse coordinator is the DON. In an interview on 5/18/25 at 6:35pm with CNA B, she stated she did not see the abuse to Resident #1, but she was told about it by other aides. CNA B stated she had been trained on abuse and neglect and she would contact her abuse coordinator. CNA B stated she did not report the allegation from the other aides because she thought they would. In an interview on 5/18/25 at 6:48pm with CNA D, she stated that on 5/4/25, Resident #1 was frustrated and agitated and was trying to get out of the facility and was on 1:1. CNA D stated the police had been called and LVN B said to Resident #1, you are here because your mother can't deal with you and you need to go to jail. Resident #1 said shut up, bitch and flipped off LVN B. LVN B flipped off Resident #1 and said, I can do it too. Resident #1 called LVN B a bitch and LVN B said, you need to go to jail and need to go to a mental hospital to Resident #1. CNA D stated Resident #1 said, shut up bitch, I'm gonna punch you and LVN B said, come on and punch me and I want you to punch me and CNA D stated she got up and tried to redirect Resident #1 and LVN B kept talking trash to Resdient #1. CNA D stated she failed and should have reported LVN B to the DON. CNA D stated she thought other nurses would have reported. CNA D stated she had been trained on abuse and neglect and she should have reported to DON because DON is Abuse coordinator and failure to report would not happen again. In an interview on 5/18/25 at 7:05pm with CNA C, she stated LVN B was agitating Resident #1 and told Resident #1 she needed to go to jail, and her [family member] dropped her off because nobody wanted her. CNA C stated Resident #1 got upset and said, shut up bitch and flipped off LVN B and LVN B kept going and flipped her off back. CNA C stated she could not believe this was happening right in front of the cops. CNA C stated Resident #1 went after LVN B and facility staff intervened and the cops didn't do anything. CNA C stated she thought the police would do something and take care of it. CNA C stated she came into work the next day to report it to the DON, but DON was not there and then CNA C was off for a couple of days and time just went by. CNA C stated she did not report the incident because she thought others would and she should have reported it herself. CNA C stated she has been trained on abuse and neglect and she should report to the DON, the abuse coordinator. CNA C stated she feels she can report to the DON and has in the past. In an observation on 5/19/25 at 9:44am, sign on the wall in the lobby revealed Abuse Coordinator as DON and her contact phone number. In an interview on 5/19/25 at 4:54pm with LVN B, she stated Resident #1 was trying to get at patients and knocking things off the nurse's station and was psycho and 300 pounds. LVN B stated [Resident #1] was supposed to be on 1:1 in her room for suicide watch and coming to the front agitating other patients. LVN B stated, Resident #1 was [AGE] years old acting like a smart ass and would not mind staff. LVN B stated she was passing medications, parked her cart, and Resident #1 threw her the finger and LVN B did the same thing back. LVN B stated that Resident #1 needed to be in a mental institution and the facility was not appropriate, and staff were just babysitting. LVN B stated she told Resident #1 to go to her room and Resident #1 flipped her off and LVN B could not handle disrespectful children. LVN B stated she did flip off Resident #1 but did not say anything. LVN B stated it was a reaction because Resident #1 was pushing buttons. LVN B then stated she did tell the police they needed to take Resident #1 because she would not calm down. In an interview on 6/4/25 at 8:40am with CNA E, she stated she was Resident #1's 1:1 on the evening of the incident and it was her first time working with Resident #1. Resident #1 was throwing everything, books, and pens off the nurse's station. Resident #1 would be yelling, and she called CNA E a bitch for following her and she said she didn't need a 1:1. CNA E stated other residents did see, maybe 2 or 3 residents at the nurse's station. They were staring at Resident #1, and one lady said we needed to call the cops. CNA E stated she did not see Resident #1 try to hurt herself. CNA E stated Resident #1 went outside because she did not want to be there. CNA E stated there were CNA's, residents, and nurses around during the incident. CNA E stated Resident #1 was calling LVN B a bitch and flipped her off and LVN B flipped her off back and Resident #1 tried to hit LVN B, and another aide got in between them. CNA E stated she had moved back so she did not see everything. The cops calmed Resident #1 down. Then CNA D stepped in between them. CNA E stated she heard LVN B say, I can do that too and flipped off Resident #1. LVN B told Resident #1 to go to her room. CNA E stated she had been trained on abuse and neglect and should report to ADM Immediately. CNA E stated she should have reported but there was a lot going on and a lot of people involved so she thought they would report because she felt they had a better account of the situation. In an interview on 5/19/25 at 12:56pm with ADON, she stated that all staff have been trained on abuse and neglect. ADON stated all staff have been trained on what abuse would look like and who to report to. ADON stated that they report to the DON, abuse coordinator. ADON stated she was not aware and had not heard anything about LVN B being abusive. ADON stated LVN B should be terminated for abuse, and CNA C and CNA D were placed on final warning for not reporting it. In a follow up interview on 5/20/25 at 12:48pm with DON, she stated all staff had been trained on abuse and neglect a bunch of times. DON stated she had her number posted and was the abuse coordinator. DON stated at the time of the incident with LVN B, the abuse coordinator was administrator and DON was back up abuse coordinator. DON stated she had never heard of, and no one reported abuse form LVN B to Resdient #1. DON stated she had started 1:1 training with each staff member to prevent this in the future. DON stated staff failed to report and she had retrained, counseled, and wrote up the staff that failed to report. LVN B worked approximately 10 shifts between 05/04/2025 and 05/18/2025. Record review of In-Service Training Report dated 4/3/25 revealed CNA C, and CNA D had been trained on abuse and neglect. Record review of Abuse Prohibition Policy dated 5/17/2024 revealed, .Identification: 1. Any allegation of abuse/neglect, made by residents/staff/visitors shall be reported to the Abuse Coordinator and investigated immediately .Reporting/Response: 1. Any employee who becomes aware of an allegation of abuse, neglect, or misappropriation of resident property, shall report the incident to the Abuse Coordinator immediately. Failure to do so will result in disciplinary action, up to and including termination. On 6/04/25 at 2:09pm, an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified. The ADM was notified. The ADM was provided with the IJ template, and a Plan of Removal (POR) was requested at that time. The following Plan of Removal was submitted by the facility and accepted on 06/05/25 at 4:35 pm and included: Social worker, or designee made life satisfaction rounds to residents that can be interviewed to ensure free from abuse and neglect. Staff caring for residents who are unable to be interviewed have been interviewed for any noted changes in residents' behavior. Any abuse or neglect identified will be immediately reported to the abuse coordinator and then HHSC by who ever witnessed or heard about the incident. Completed 6/5/2025.No findings of abuse reported. Administrator trained and is initiating the implementation of Neighbor rounds completing assessments on their residents for potential abuse on 6/5/2025. This will be completed daily by the leadership team during the week and Manager on Duty on weekends. Neighbor rounds are reported daily to the IDT team and will be reviewed during monthly QAPI meeting. This systemic change will ensure that all residents, whether they are able to be interviewed or not, are free from abuse. On May 18, 2025, LVN B was suspended pending the outcome of the investigation. Upon completion of the investigation, LVN B was terminated May 21,2025. On May 19, 2025, Corporate Clinical specialist in-serviced DON regarding Abuse and Neglect policies and procedures, with emphasis on definition of verbal abuse and different scenarios. Competency was verified by a quiz. DON in-serviced staff regarding Abuse and Neglect policies and procedures, with emphasis on definition of verbal abuse and scenario example discussed. Competency was verified with a quiz. Staff will not be allowed to work until they have passed the quiz. Verbal abuse quiz and in-service will be added to the new hire abuse training. Staff were trained over Approaches, Activities and Interventions in Response to Behaviors of people with Mental Health or Psychiatric Needs including how to manage different behaviors, deescalating the situation, removing aggressive resident from the area where other residents may be present or removing the other residents from the area of situation, and to immediately report incident to facility Abuse Coordinator. Completed 6/5/2025. Peer interviews over knowledge of facility's Abuse and Neglect Policy and Procedures, will be conducted weekly, with no less than 10 staff members, by Social Worker, and/or designee for 8 weeks. Following 8 weeks follow up, monthly Peer Interviews will be conducted by Social Worker and/or designee. The abuse coordinator, or designee, shall be responsible for monitoring this corrective action. Any negative findings will be reported to the facility's QA committee for review and corrective action. Completed 6/5/25. Monitoring of the Plan of Removal from 6/05/25 included the following: Record review of Inservice dated 6/5/25 with leadership team of 12 staff for neighbor rounds revealed staff are to assess residents for changes in behavior/mood; auditing/asking staff about any signs of abuse and whether sexual, physical, or verbal abuse. In an interview on 6/5/25 at 5:56pm with the ADON, she stated the SW interviewed her on abuse and what she should do to check her knowledge. The ADON stated she had been trained on neighbor rounds. She stated staff will be dividing certain hallways, certain rooms, and do morning rounds. The ADON stated staff would talk to those residents and assess for any issue. She stated staff would see if they had any issues or concerns, and address the concerns, and bring to the morning IDT meetings. The ADON stated staff also did a drill on how to clear the room of other residents, keep everyone safe, and how to approach and deescalate a resident that is aggressive or displaying behaviors. The ADON stated the facility Inserviced all staff on abuse & neglect, reiterated differences and examples of each, and who to report to and when. The ADON stated the DON was going to randomly audit staff on their training. In an interview on 6/5/25 at 6:15pm with SW, she stated she had completed resident and staff interviews regarding abuse and specifically verbal abuse and staff interviews going forward and upping the neighbor rounds program. SW stated she was to round on the second half of A hall every morning and check with residents to see how things are going. She stated she was to see if residents are well and check environmentally and if they have concerns write grievances for that, The SW stated staff are to build rapport to find the abuse if it was happening. The SW stated she had completed life satisfaction rounds and found no concerns of abuse. In an interview on 6/6/25 at 10:35 am with the Administrator and the DON, the ADM stated this day was the first day for Neighbor rounds. The ADM stated staff are assigned rooms and report on the rooms daily (no one has more than 6 rooms each), utilizing a check list. The ADM provided the checklist to the investigator. The DON stated this day was the first day. It went well, and no issues of abuse or neglect was identified. The ADM stated the rounds sheets are reviewed in the morning round each morning daily. The ADM stated on the weekend, the Manager on Duty completes the review of the sheets and reports to the Administrator directly if there is a concern. In an observation on 6/6/25 at 10:35am observed the checklist with staff to use for Neighbor rounds. Record review of Neighbor round observations for 6/6/25 at 10:54 am. All rooms and residents were observed in facility. No concerns regarding abuse and neglect identified. In an interview on 6/6/25 at 11:03 am with Resident # 15, she stated this morning a staff told her she was her neighbor and would be checking on her every day. Resident #15 stated she feels safe and had no concerns with care. In an interview on 6/6/25 at 11:08 am with Resident #16, she stated staff told her this morning that she was her neighbor and would be checking on her every day. Resident #16 stated she feels safe and had no concerns with care. In an interview on 6/6/25 at 11:09 am with Resident #17, she stated a staff told her this morning that she was her neighbor and would be checking on her every day. Resident #17 stated she feels safe and had no concerns with care. In an interview on 6/6/25 at 11:10 am with Resident #14, she stated a staff told her this morning that she was her neighbor and would be checking on her every day. Resident #14 stated she feels safe and had no concerns with care. In an interview on 6/6/25 at 11:12 am with Resident #18, he stated a staff member met with him this morning and stated they were his Neighbor and would be meeting with him every morning to make sure he was ok. He stated he feels safe and there were no concerns with care. In an interview on 6/6/25 at 11:14 am with Resident #19, she stated a staff met with her this morning and stated they were her neighbor and would be checking on her every morning to make sure she was good. She stated she feels safe and there were no concerns with care. Record review of Life Satisfaction rounds dated 6/5/25 revealed One staff completed satisfaction rounds for hall A for 11 residents with no concerns found. Second staff completed satisfaction rounds for hall B for 14 residents with no concerns noted. C Hall staff satisfaction round for 14 residents found no concerns. D hall satisfaction rounds for 18 residents found no current concerns. F hall satisfaction rounds for 4 residents with no concerns found. NON-Verbal rounds: A hall satisfaction rounds for 3 residents with no concerns. Random B/C/E hall satisfaction round for 12 residents with no concerns noted. D hall satisfaction rounds for 6 residents with no concerns notes. Record review of Inservice dated 5/19/25 for abuse & neglect for DON. Record review of Verbal competency quiz dated 6/5/25 for 18 staff. All staff passed. Record review of Verbal competency quiz dated 5/20/25 for 19 staff. All staff passed. Record review of Verbal competency quiz dated 5/18/25-5/19/25 for 49 staff. All staff passed. In an interview on 6/5/25 at 4:41pm with LVN E, she stated she had been trained on abuse and neglect. Verbal abuse is any cuss words, gestures, or words that are meant to hurt someone. LVN E stated she was just trained on this day and about a couple of weeks ago. She stated she was quizzed and made 100%. LVN E stated she had been trained on residents with mental health and aggressive behaviors and remove the resident and the other residents in the area. LVN E stated if she was told or see or hear about any allegation of abuse, report it to the ADM immediately, no matter the time of day. The ADM & the DON went over scenarios about different types of abuse and examples. In an interview on 6/5/25 at 5:12pm with LVN D, she stated she was trained on abuse and neglect on that day, and she stated staff did it a week and half ago, also. LVN D stated if anyone alleges abuse, she was to tell the ADM immediately and call anytime as soon as it happens. LVN D stated they trained on types of abuse like verbal abuse: yelling at them, and/or gesturing. She stated neglect is not changing residents. LVN D stated she was quizzed and passed. LVN D stated she had been trained on behavioral patients, and to use a calm voice, and remove other residents if you can't redirect them. She stated to also give them their space because too many people asking questions and getting at them can cause issue to. In an interview on 6/5/25 at 5:25pm with CNA H stated he had been trained on abuse and neglect. We did one last week and one today. CNA H stated he was trained on types of abuse. Example of abuse is derogatory marks or cursing at residents and gesturing. They quizzed CNA H and he passed. CNA H stated he had been trained on deescalating conflict and individuals with behaviors. If they are aggressive, we try to guide the individual away for the situation and try to help them and calm. But if that doesn't work, we try to remove the other residents and have staff assist me. Then if it is abuse, I report to ADM immediately. In an interview on 6/5/25 at 5:35pm with the ADM, she stated she added the verbal abuse quiz to emphasize it on the new hire check list. Record review of New Hire, Rehire & Transfer information form revised 6/02/25 revealed verbal abuse competency quiz was added. Record review Inservice for Clear the area drill dated 6/5/25 for all direct care staff. Record review of Inservice dated 6/5/25 for approaching, activities & interventions in response to behavior and people with mental health/psychiatric needs. Record review of Inservice dated 5/18/25 for verbal abuse scenario/drill for 52 staff. Record review of Inservice dated 5/18/25 for abuse & neglect - policy & procedure for 47 staff. In an interview on 6/6/25 at 11:02 am with CMA, she stated she had received training on ANE, how to clear an area and steps to help deescalate and respond to behaviors. She stated if she sees a concern she is to report it to the Abuse Coordinator or the DON. CMA stated she would report a nurse if needed. CMA stated that 1:1 residents can come out of their rooms. CMA stated she is aware of the Neighbor Program that started this morning. In an interview on 6/6/25 at 11:05 am with CNA I, she stated she had received training on ANE, how to clear an area and steps to help deescalate and respond to behaviors. She stated if she sees a concern she is to report it to the Abuse Coordinator or the DON. CNA I stated she would report a nurse if needed and she is aware of the Neighbor Program that started this morning. In an interview on 6/6/25 at 11:07 am with CNA J, she stated she has received training on ANE, how to clear an area and steps to help deescalate and respond to behaviors. She stated if she sees a concern she is to report it to the Abuse Coordinator or the DON. She stated she would report a nurse if needed. In an interview on 6/6/25 at 11:11am with CNA K. sitting as 1:1 with a resident stated she has received training on ANE, how to clear an area and steps to help deescalate and respond to behaviors. She stated if she sees a concern she is to report it to the Abuse Coordinator or the DON. She stated she would report a nurse if needed. CNA K stated 1:1 residents can come out of their rooms and she is aware of the Neighbor Program that started this morning. In an interview on 6/6/25 at 11:15 am with CNA L, she stated she has received training on ANE, how to clear an area and steps to help deescalate and respond to behaviors. She stated if she sees a concern she is to report it to[TRUNCATED]
Jul 2024 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0565 (Tag F0565)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to act promptly upon the grievances of the resident group concerning i...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to act promptly upon the grievances of the resident group concerning issues of resident care and life in the facility and demonstrate their response and rationale for such response for 2 of 3 Resident Council Meetings, in that: 1. Concerns voiced during the monthly Resident Council Meetings were not addressed following meetings held on 4/17/2024 and 5/20/2024. 2. The Resident Council members were not notified regarding facility action taken to address and resolve concerns voiced in prior Resident Council Meetings during the next monthly meetings held on 5/20/2024 and 6/04/2024. 3. The follow-up to Resident Council concerns and discussion of old business were not documented as reviewed, read, resolved, or unresolved on the Resident Council Minutes form dated 5/20/2024. These failure placed the residents at risk for a decreased quality of life and a decreased feeling of well-being within their living environment. The findings included: Review of the Resident Council Meeting Minutes revealed the following: 5/20/24 - 9 residents attended and the Activity Director was present. The documented concerns included beds not being changed, more dental care/dentist visits were desired, and the residents wanted larger portions of food and more hamburger toppings. 6/04/24 - 10 residents and the Activity Director attended. The Activity Director reviewed previous Council Minutes and reviewed the smoking policy and outdoor area. New concerns: want the dentist to come to the building more often; discussed food preferences; question regarding why residents could not go out the back door - discussed by Administrator. 7/02/24 - 10 residents and Activity Director attended. New concerns: COVID (an acute and severe respiratory illness) screening before admission; cable for the television does not always work; food portions were too small; and headphones were needed for residents with 2 televisions in the room. Review of the Grievance Log Reports for the Resident Council revealed a total of 12 grievance reports had been completed following the Resident Council Meetings. In an interview on 7/10/24 at 9:12 AM, the Social Worker stated the grievance reports were entered into the computer. In an interview on 7/10/24 at 9:17 AM, the Resident Council President stated Resident Council Meetings were held monthly and the Activity Director wrote the meeting minutes. He stated concerns were conveyed to the Administrator and the Administrator decided if a grievance report needed to be filed. The Resident Council President stated the Council was not told the outcome of their concerns, but they could usually see an improvement or difference. He stated the Administrator and the Dietary Manager were both invited to attend the last meeting but did not attend. During an interview and record review on 7/10/24 at 9:32 AM, the Social Worker provided a Grievance Log Report dated 1/01/24 - 7/10/24. She stated the Resident Council grievances were listed under the Resident Council President's name and were printed on a separate report. Interview on 7/11/24 at 9:12 AM, during a confidential Resident Council Meeting attended by 11 residents and the Assistant Ombudsman, the residents stated Resident Council concerns were not addressed by the Administrator, there was no follow-up with the Resident Council regarding the action that was taken to address their concerns, and their concerns were not resolved. The residents conveyed that the Administrator said, We will see what we can do, and nothing was ever done. The residents stated they would go to the Social Worker to file a grievance and could also tell the RN - MDS Nurse. The Resident Council President stated about 3 weeks ago during the smoke break, the Administrator went to the smoke break area and told the residents he did not want people to go outside to the smoking area earlier than the scheduled time. He said the residents who did not smoke were not supposed to go to the smoking area. In an interview on 7/12/24 at 11:19 AM, the Social Worker stated she tracked the grievance reports in the computer and no grievance reports resulted from the June 2024 Resident Council meeting. In an interview on 7/12/24 at 11:23 AM, the Activity Director stated she gave a copy of the Resident Council meeting minutes to the Social Worker, who then completed a grievance report form and gave the form to whichever department it applied to and needed to address the grievance. The Social Worker then entered the completed form into the computer and the Administrator reviewed the forms and signed them electronically. The Activity Director stated she did not give the Resident Council a follow-up response to their complaints. She stated she did not see the grievance reports after they were completed and did not know what action had been taken or what had been done to resolve the problems. She stated she did not know if she was allowed to see the reports after they had been completed. The Activity Director stated she told the residents to keep complaining until something changed and grievance reports would be filed until the concerns were resolved. The Activity Director stated the Resident Council President invited department supervisors to the Resident Council meeting before telling her. The Activity Director stated last week she did not know the Dietary Manager and Administrator were invited and did not attend. She stated she tried to remind staff when their attendance was requested at Resident Council meetings. She stated she mentioned it to staff in the morning meetings. The Activity Director thought the Administrator had a prior commitment or appointment during the last Resident Council meeting time. She stated the Administrator did meet with a group of residents who smoke on 7/02/24 at 11:00 AM. She stated the Administrator told the residents they needed to use separate patio areas for the smokers and non-smokers due to limited space in the smoking area. The list of resident smokers had increased. In an interview on 7/12/24 at 11:31 AM, the facility Social Worker stated the Administrator went and talked to the Resident Council President and discussed the grievances and told him what had been done. She stated the list of residents who smoke had increased and they had complained about the designated smoking area located off Hall C outside the laundry building. The Social Worker stated she was the Grievance Officer but the Administrator needed to sign off on the grievance reports. In an interview on 7/12/24 at 12:44 PM, the Administrator stated he met with a group of resident smokers on 7/02/24 at 11:00 AM in the smoking area and went over the smoking policy and the rule regarding no unsupervised smoking. He stated the residents were required to give all cigarettes, lighters, matches and paraphernalia to the staff to keep in the box locked in the medication room. He stated there was a resident who would go out to the smoking area and beg and [NAME] other residents to give her a cigarette. He stated the non-smoking residents were told they were not to be out in the smoking area. The residents who smoke were told if they could not or would not comply with the smoking policy and continued to put other residents' lives at risk, they would receive a 30-day written discharge notice. The Administrator stated he had spoken to the residents about it two times now. He stated so far the residents were ok with it. The Administrator stated he followed up with the Resident Council President regarding all Resident Council complaints and grievances. He stated he would start giving the completed grievance reports to the Activity Director to review with the Resident Council during their next meetings. Review of the facility's policy and procedure for Filing Grievances/Complaints, dated as revised 6/2024, indicated the following [in part]: Policy Statement: Our facility will assist residents, their representatives (sponsors), other interested family members, or advocates in filing grievances or complaints when such requests are made. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 1. Any resident, his or her representative (sponsor), family member or advocate may file a grievance or complaint concerning his or her treatment, medical care, behavior of other residents, staff members, theft of property, etc., without fear of discrimination, threat or reprisal in any form. 2. Grievances and/or complaints my be submitted orally, in writing, or electronically and may be filed anonymously. 3. All grievances, complaints, or recommendations stemming from resident or family groups concerning issues of resident care in the facility will be considered. Actions on such issues will be responded to in writing (if requested), including a rationale for the response . 11. The resident, or person filing the grievance and/or complaint on behalf of the resident, will be informed verbally and in writing (if requested) of the findings of the investigation and the actions that will be taken to correct any identified problems . Review of the policy for Grievance Procedures - Residents, dated as revised 12/2020, indicated the following [in part]: Policy: .to provide an open line of communication and a process which allows residents the opportunity for expressing suggestions, questions, concerns, and complaints without fear of retribution. Procedure: Resident Council: In order to facilitate communication in the community in an organized manner, a Resident Council is established. Meetings each month provide a forum for all residents to make suggestions, recommendations, and voice concerns regarding items such as policies and procedures .and the functioning of resident committees. Staff members will attend meetings by invitation only. Minutes of the monthly meetings are to be taken and a copy given to Executive Director (Administrator). The Activity Director will attend and serve as a liaison between the council and administration. The Activity Director will also record the minutes of the meeting. Issues of concern shall be addressed with the Executive Director (Administrator) or designee who will communicate the resolution of such issues of concern to the residents in a timely fashion .
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen, in that: 1. Appliance surfaces were soiled with dried food, grease and burned food. 2. Bulk storage container lids were soiled with food particles and dust. 3. Opened food item packages in the refrigerator, freezer, and dry food storage room were not placed in sealed containers, were not labeled with the contents, and were not dated when opened. 4. Expired milk was stored on the shelves in the refrigerator. 5. Cartons of expired prune juice was stored on a shelf in the dry food storage room. 6. Cooking utensils and pans were stored with their sanitized surfaces exposed to contaminants in the air. 7. A live fly moved throughout the main kitchen and food preparation area during a follow-up visit to the kitchen on 7/11/24. This failure could place residents at risk for foodborne illness, compromised nutritional health status, and being served food items that may not be fresh, taste stale, or be contaminated. The findings included: Observations and interviews starting at 7/08/24 at 9:18 AM, during the initial tour of facility kitchen, revealed the following: - the hand washing sink interior surface was soiled with dried brown colored spots; - the manual can opener, mounted to the end of the stainless-steel food preparation counter, food contact surface was soiled with dark colored substance build-up; - the toaster surface was soiled and rusted; - the stainless steel counter above toaster was soiled with spilled spices, dust and grease; - 3 bulk storage containers beneath the food preparation counter were used for storing food thickener, granulated sugar, and flour and had soiled lids; a piece of grated cheese was stuck to the inside of the lid for the food thickener; - the storage container for corn meal had a soiled lid; - the convection oven top exterior surface was soiled with dust and grease; the interior surface soiled with spilled burned food; - the top exterior surface of the steamer was soiled with dust and grease; - the 2 gas ovens had spilled and burned food on their interior bottom surfaces; - the deep fryer unit had dark colored cooking oil; the interior surface was soiled with fried food crumbs; the 2 fryer baskets were soiled with fried food crumbs - the unit was not in use; - the commercial refrigerator used for bread and milk contained 3 one-half gallon cartons of lactose free milk with a manufacturer's expiration dates of 7/04/24 (unopened) and 3 one-half gallon containers of buttermilk with expiration dates of 6/29/24 (unopened) - the Dietary Manager removed the cartons and placed them on a cart to throw them away; - the nonperishable food storage room had wire rack shelf units with 9 unopened 46-ounce cartons of prune juice with 6/1 written with a black marker pen on them and had manufacturer's expiration dates of 9/30/23 - the Dietary Manager stated they were delivered 6/01/2023; she removed the 9 cartons of prune juice and placed them on the cart with the milk and buttermilk to dispose of them; - an open bag of cookie pieces was wrapped with plastic and dated 6/29/24 (not in a sealed container or resealable bag); - an open of bag white cake mix was wrapped in plastic and dated 6/25/24; - an open bag of pound cake mix was wrapped in plastic and not dated when opened; - an open pouch of blueberry muffin mix was in a resealable bag and was not labeled and dated; - an open 50-pound paper bag with pancake mix had the top of opened bag rolled to close; the Dietary Manager proceeded to use a marker pen and wrote 7/2 on the bag and stated it should have tape on it; - an open bag with dry spaghetti was tied/knotted closed and was not labeled or dated; - an open bag with dry pasta was closed with a binder clips and was not labeled and dated; - the walk-in refrigerator contained cheese slices wrapped in plastic that were not labeled and dated; deli ham slices were in a resealable bag that was not labeled and dated; breaded ribs were in a resealable bag dated 4/30 - the Dietary Manager stated the ribs were in the freezer and she was not sure why they were taken out; - raw ground beef was wrapped in plastic and not labeled and dated on a shelf in the walk-in freezer; the Dietary Manager removed the frozen ground beef from the freezer; - a reach-in freezer unit against the wall in the food preparation area contained open packages of mixed vegetables that were not labeled and dated, with 1 bag wrapped in plastic and 1 bag tied/knotted closed; an opened bag of broccoli wrapped in plastic and not labeled and dated; an opened bag with biscuit dough was tied/knotted closed and was not labeled and dated; raw beef patties were stored in a large resealable bag and were not labeled and dated; - cooking utensils, including a wire whisk, serving spoons and scoops were hanging from a metal panel on the wall above the steam table with their sanitized surfaces exposed to contaminants in the air; - the beverage station area of the kitchen had an ice machine; the top exterior surface of the ice machine was soiled with dust; - the beverage station area of the kitchen had a residential style refrigerator with top freezer compartment; the top exterior surface was soiled with dust. Observation and interview on 7/11/24 at 4:37 PM, during preparation of the evening meal, revealed a live fly moving in the area of the food preparation counter. The fly landed on the lid to the bulk storage container used for food thickener on the shelf beneath the counter. [NAME] A stated the flies had been bad this year. She stated the flies came in when the doors to the outside were opened, especially the door to the designated smoking area off Hall C. During an interview and record review on 7/12/24 at 2:58 PM, the Dietary Manager stated the cooks and dietary aides had cleaning schedules for daily cleaning tasks to be completed during the morning and evening shifts. She stated the forms were kept in a binder notebook on a shelf in the kitchen. Review of the cleaning schedule forms revealed the staff initialed assigned tasks as completed. During an observation and interview on 7/12/24 at 3:05 PM, the serving utensils continued to hang from the metal panel on the wall above the steam table with their sanitized food surfaces exposed to the open air and any contaminants in the air. The Dietary Manager started removing the utensils and stated she would find a storage bin with a lid to put them in. Review of the facility policy and procedure for Sanitization, dated as revised November 2022, specified the following [in part]: Policy Statement The food service area is maintained in a clean and sanitary condition. Policy Interpretation and Implementation 1. All kitchens, kitchen areas and dining areas are kept clean, free from garbage and debris, and protected from rodents and insects. 2. All utensils, counters, shelves and equipment are kept clean, maintained in good repair . Review of the facility policy and procedure for Food Receiving and Storage, dated October 2022, specified the following [in part]: Policy Statement Food shall be received and stored in a manner that complies with safe food handling practices. Policy Interpretation and Implementation 8. All foods stored in the refrigerator or freezer will be covered, labeled and dated (use by date) . Review of the facility policy and procedure for Dry Storage, dated October 2022, specified [in part]: 4. If a food is taken out of the original container (what the manufacturer placed the product in) it must be labeled and dated. 5. All expired foods must be removed from the store room . 9. If an item is opened, the food must be tightly sealed. It should be dated with the date that it was opened. If the product was removed from its original container, then the product should also have the name of the product. If using large bags to seal open items in their original packaging, the bag may be reused, but needs to be re-dated. If the food is directly in the bag, the bag must be labeled and dated, and when the bag is emptied, it should be discarded. Bags must be sealed . The Food and Drug Administration Food Code 2022 specified [in part]: Chapter 3 Food 3-202.15 Package Integrity. FOOD packages shall be in good condition and protect the integrity of the contents so that the FOOD is not exposed to ADULTERATION or potential contaminants. Chapter 4 Equipment, Utensils, and Linens 4-903.11 Equipment, Utensils, Linens, and Single-Service and Single-Use Articles. (A) Except as specified in (D) of this section, cleaned EQUIPMENT and UTENSILS, laundered LINENS, and SINGLE-SERVICE and SINGLE-USE ARTICLES shall be stored: (1) In a clean, dry location; (2) Where they are not exposed to splash, dust, or other contamination; and (3) At least 15 cm (6 inches) above the floor. (B) Clean EQUIPMENT and UTENSILS shall be stored as specified under (A) of this section and shall be stored: (1) In a self-draining position that allows air drying; and (2) Covered or inverted.
Nov 2023 7 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Assessment Accuracy (Tag F0641)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to have assessments that accurately reflect the status of 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for resident assessments. Resi...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to have assessments that accurately reflect the status of 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for resident assessments. Resident #1's Annual MDS did not reflect his current behavioral state. This failure could place residents at risk of a decreased quality of care and not having their individualized needs met or communicated accurately to staff. Findings Include: Record review of Resident #1's admission record dated 11/07/2023, revealed Resident #1 was 86 years-old and was admitted to facility on 07/29/2023 with a diagnoses of encephalopathy (brain disease that alters brain function), Alzheimer's Disease (neurodegenerative disease that destroys memory and other important mental function), Altered Mental Status (changes in consciousness, appearance, behavior, mood, affect, motor activity or cognitive function) and Delirium (serious disturbance in mental abilities that result in confused thinking and reduced thinking and reduced awareness of surroundings). Resident #1 was discharged to another facility on 11/07/2023. Record review of Resident #1's admission MDS assessment Cognitive Patterns section dated 08/05/2023 revealed Resident #1 had a BIMS of 05 which indicated severe impaired cognition; signs and symptoms of delirium such as exhibited inattention behavior and disorganized thinking behavior that was continuously present. Further review of the admission MDS Behaviors section revealed Resident #1 did not exhibit physical behaviors toward others; however, did exhibit verbal behaviors towards others 4 to 6 days a week and the behaviors did not place residents at significant risk for physical illness or injury, nor significantly interfere with the resident's care, nor significantly intrude on the privacy or activity of others, nor significantly disrupt the care or living environment of others. Further review of admission MDS Behaviors section revealed Resident #1 exhibited rejection of care and wandered 1 to 3 days a week; however, Resident #1 did not wander or intrude on the privacy or activities of others. Further review of Resident #1's admission MDS assessment medication section revealed Resident #1 did not receive any medications for anxiety. Further review of Resident #1's admission MDS assessment restraint and alarm sections revealed Resident #1 wore a wander guard alarm. Record review of Resident #1's Comprehensive Care Plan completed on 08/16/2023 revealed Resident #1 was evaluated as a wandering risk related to decreased safety awareness, confusion and wandering behaviors; staff were to observe Resident #1 for signs and symptoms of agitation, pacing, repetitive verbalization's of wanting to leave/go home, restlessness. Staff were to also report increased behaviors to nurses for further interventions. Further review of Resident #1's Comprehensive Care Plan revealed that the resident had the potential to be verbally aggressive, yelling loudly, throws arms in the air. Resident #1 was to verbalize his understanding of the need to control his verbally abusive behaviors. Resident #1 was an elopement risk related to being disoriented to place with history of attempts to leave the facility unattended, impaired safety awareness, and wandered aimlessly. Review of Resident #1's of 1:1 (1 Resident with 1 Staff) handwritten observation sheets from 08/15/2023 to 11/05/2023 revealed Resident #1 had 1:1 staffing every day from 08/15/2023 to 11/05/2023 during the day. During a confidential interview on 11/02/2023 at 11:45 AM., it was said Resident #1 was aggressive daily towards staff and tried to get out of the building, so he was placed on 1:1 observation. The confidential interviewee said the facility staff were told not to document the 1:1 observation in the resident's record. During a confidential interview on 11/02/2023 at 12:30 PM., it was said that Resident #1's 1 to 1 observations were not being documented so that another facility would accept him. During a confidential interview on 11/02/2023 at 1:50 PM., it was said that Resident #1 was 1 on 1 in the day and not at night. During an interview on 11/06/2023 at 9:05 AM, the DON said that Resident #1 had a physical and mental decline since he admitted to the facility, which was not captured on the admission MDS assessment. She said it was due to the MDS Coordinator not capturing the assessment correctly. She said that this could cause issues in capturing an accurate picture of the resident. During an interview on 11/06/2023 at 2:13 PM., the MDS Coordinator said that she was new in the position, and she started May 25, 2023. She said she requested help and training with the DON and Corporate. She said that she was not adequately trained, and she let the Admin, DON and corporate know that she did not know what she was doing. She revealed that this failure could place the residents at risk for not assessing all their care needs. A policy on Accuracy of Assessments was requested on 11/06/2023 at 3:00 PM to the DON and was not provided by the time of exit.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, which inc...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, which included measurable objectives and time frames to meet residents' mental and psychosocial needs, for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan to address Resident #1's physical, verbal, and sexual aggressive behaviors towards staff, visual function, risk for falls, risk for pressure ulcers, antianxiety medications, and 1:1 staffing. This failure could place residents at risk for their medical, physical, and psychosocial needs not being met. The findings were: Record review of Resident #1's admission record dated 11/07/2023, revealed Resident #1 was 86 years-old and was admitted to facility on 07/29/2023 with a diagnoses of encephalopathy (brain disease that alters brain function), Alzheimer's Disease (neurodegenerative disease that destroys memory and other important mental function), Altered Mental Status (changes in consciousness, appearance, behavior, mood, affect, motor activity or cognitive function) and Delirium (serious disturbance in mental abilities that result in confused thinking and reduced thinking and reduced awareness of surroundings). Resident was discharged to another facility on 11/07/2023. Record review of Resident #1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment Cognitive Patterns Section, dated 08/05/2023, revealed Resident #1 had a BIMS of 05 which indicated severe impaired cognition. Further review of the admission MDS Care Area Assessment Summary section revealed Resident #1 was triggered to have care plan interventions for Cognitive loss/ Dementia, Visual Function, Communication, ADL Function, Behaviors, Falls, and Risk of Pressure Ulcers. Record review of Resident #1's Comprehensive Care plan, completed on 08/16/2023, revealed no evidence of care plan interventions for Cognitive loss/ Dementia, Visual Function, Communication, ADL Function, Behaviors, Falls, and Risk of Pressure Ulcers. During an interview on 11/06/2023 at 9:05 AM, the DON said that Resident #1's care plan should have captured his 1 to 1 observation, his antianxiety medications, and his behaviors when his Comprehensive Care Plan Assessment was completed. She said that she was not part of the care plan process, and her expectations were for those issues to be addressed. She said that this could cause issues in capturing an accurate picture of the resident. During an interview on 11/06/2023 at 2:13 PM., the MDS Coordinator said that she was responsible for the Comprehensive Care Plan assessments, and she was new in this position when she started May 25, 2023. She had requested help and additional training from the DON and Corporate. She said that she should have captured on the care plan that Resident #1 was receiving 1 to 1 observation, behaviors, his risk for pressure ulcers, his visual loss and his risk for falls, but she did not know that the CAAS areas should have been captured in the care plan. She said that this could cause the resident to not receive to care they need. A copy of the facilities policy and procedures titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person- Centered was received on 11/06/2023 at 3:00 PM by the DON, revealed the following: Policy Statement: A comprehensive person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the residence physical, psychosocial, and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: The intra-disciplinary team IDT, is conjunction with the resident and his or her family or legal representative, develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident. 2. The care plan interventions are derived from my thorough analysis of the gathered information as part of the comprehensive assessment. 8. The comprehensive person-centered care plan will: g. Incorporate identified the problem areas. h. incorporates risk factors associated with identified problems: k. reflects treatment goals, timetables, and objectives in measurable outcomes. m. Aid in preventing or reducing decline in the residence functional status and, or functional levels enhance the optimal functioning of the resident by focusing on rehabilitative program. 13. Assessments of residents are ongoing, and care plans a revised as information about the resident and the residence condition change 14. The interdisciplinary team must review and update the care plan: a. when there has been a significant change in the residence condition.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary services to maintain personal hy...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary services to maintain personal hygiene for one of two residents (Resident #3) reviewed for activities of daily living. The facility failed to provide Resident #3 with assistance with ADLs as care planned. This failure placed residents at risk of not maintaining good hygiene and assistance with ADL's. Findings include: Review of Resident #3's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Alzheimer's Disease (progressive disease that destroys memory) and hypertension (high blood pressure). Review of the Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed the Resident #3 had the following: Section C- BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score of 0, (severely cognitively impaired). Section GG- ADL's (Functional Abilities) score of 1, dependent (helper does all of the effort, resident does none of the effort). Review of Resident #3's Care plan dated 04/13/2023 indicated the resident needed extensive assistance from staff to complete all activities of daily living. Record review of Resident #3's ADL Documentation Report for July 2023 revealed no evidence of ADLs for bed mobility, dressing, locomotion on and off the unit, personal hygiene, toilet use, transferring, and bladder elimination was not completed on 07/04/2023, 07/10/2023, 07/12/2023, 07/13/2023, 07/18/2023 through 07/24/2023, and 07/27/2023. Further review of ADL documentation report revealed that on the days Resident #3 received ADL care was only once a day. Record review of Resident #3's ADL Documentation Report for August 2023 revealed no evidence of ADLs for bed mobility, dressing, locomotion on and off the unit, personal hygiene, toilet use, transferring, and bladder elimination was not completed 08/02/2023, 08/03/2023, 08/05/2023 through 08/09/2023, 08/11/2023, 08/14/2023 through 08/16/2023, 08/19/2023, 08/20/2023 through 08/23/2023, 08/25/2023, 08/26/2023, and 08/29/2023 to 08/31/2023. Further review of ADL documentation report revealed that on the days Resident #3 received ADL care was only once a day. Record review of Resident #3's ADL Documentation Report for September 2023 was requested and not provided. Record review of Resident #3's ADL Documentation Report for October 2023 revealed no evidence of ADL for bed mobility, dressing, locomotion on and off the unit, personal hygiene, toilet use, transferring, and bladder elimination was not completed 10/01/2023 through 10/31/2023. During an interview on 11/01/2023 at 2:23 PM, Resident #3's Representative said that she had complaints with Resident #3's personal care. She said that there are times Resident #3 was not changed at night and that Resident #3's sheets were dirty. She said that the facility told her that the facility was going to start limiting the residents' briefs and that of the other residents. She said that things have gotten better since she installed a camera in Resident #3's room. She revealed that Resident #3 did not answer to questions, and Resident #3 required full help with ADL's. During an observation on 11/01/2023 at 2:40 PM, Resident #3 was asleep in her bed. She did not respond to knocking or asking to come in. She did not make eye contact, but her eyes did open slightly. Her sheets were dirty with dried brown smeared marks on the left side of the resident. During an interview on 11/02/2023 at 1:50 PM, Confidential Staff stated the staffing sheet did not reflect staffing accurately because the DON would pull staff members to do other things. She said that there have been residents that have needed more care than usual. She said that staff were not completing ADL's and care areas and that she and others have notified the DON. During an interview on 11/02/2023 at 1:40 PM, the DON said that the facility did not do any showers on 11/01/2023 due to the shower nurse calling in. She said she did not know about it until today. She said that the facility was having issues with ADL's being completed and documented, especially by the night shift. She said that her reports showed that there were days where it showed 0% of ADL's were completed for that shift. She could not say for sure that it was or was not completed. She said that if it was not documented, it did not happen. She said that she was working with staff to correct these issues. She said she had been out on medical leave and things just got behind. She said this failure could cause skin issues, and other concerns. A copy of the facilities policy and procedures titled Activities of Daily Living (ADL's), dated March 2018 revealed the following: Policy Statement: Residents will be provided with care, treatment and services as appropriate to maintain or improve their abilities to carry out activities of daily living. Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 1) Residents will be provided with care, treatment and services to ensure that their activities of daily living do not diminish unless the circumstances of their clinical condition demonstrate that diminishing ADL's is unavoidable. 2) Appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADL's independently, with the consent of the resident and in accordance with the plan of care, including appropriate support and assistance with : a) Hygiene (bathing, dressing, grooming and oral care) b) Mobility (transfer and ambulation, including walking)
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were secured on 2 of 2 medication carts reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility did not ensure medica...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were secured on 2 of 2 medication carts reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility did not ensure medications carts were secured and locked. This failure could place the residents at risk of a drug diversion. Findings included: During an observation on 11/06/2023 at 10:23 AM, LVN F left a medication cart unlocked for hall D and unattended with residents near the medication cart. She did not have visual of the medication cart and was unaware she left the medication cart unlocked. The medication cart contained over the counter medications, and prescription (non-controlled) medications. During an observation on 11/06/2023 at 2:30 PM, the ADON left a medication cart unlocked for hall A and unattended with residents walking near the medication cart. She did not have visual of the medication cart and was unaware she left the medication cart unlocked. The medication cart contained over the counter medications, and prescription medications. During an interview on 11/06/2023 at 10:30 AM, LVN F said that she walked away to go to the medication room. She said that she should have locked the medication cart before she left it unattended with residents around it. She said that this could cause a patient to get into it. During an interview on 11/06/2023 at 10:45 AM, the DON said that her expectations were for the medication carts to be locked anytime a nurse walks away from it. She said that she did training and in-service to make sure staff members knew to always lock their carts. She said that staff knew the risk involved with a medication cart that was unlocked and unattended. During an interview on 11/06/2023 at 2:30 PM, the ADON said that she walked away to go to the medication room due to a call light going off down the hall. She revealed that she is not used to working the floor and did not remember to lock it or check if it was locked before she walked off. She revealed that she was out of sight and could not visualize the medication cart. She revealed this failure could possibly put the 5 residents that were by the medication cart in danger, if one of them got ahold of the prescription medications that were in it. A policy and procedure titled Storage of Medication, dated April 1029 revealed the following: Policy Statement: The facility stores all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure and orderly manner. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 3. The nursing staff is responsible for maintaining medication storage and preparation areas in a clean, safe and sanitary manner. 8. Compartments (including, but not limited to, drawers, cabinets, rooms, refrigerators, carts and boxes) containing drugs and biologicals are locked when not in use.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Medical Records (Tag F0842)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident were complete in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices for 1 of 15 reside...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident were complete in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices for 1 of 15 residents (Resident #1) whose clinical records were reviewed for accuracy. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's clinical record had a physician's orders entered for the 1 on 1 observations, scheduled documentation of the observations, missing signatures of who wrote the notes on the 1 on 1 observations on the paper documentation. This failure could place residents at risk for inaccurate or incomplete clinical records. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's admission record dated 11/07/2023, revealed Resident #1 was 86 years-old and was admitted to facility on 07/29/2023 with a diagnoses of encephalopathy (brain disease that alters brain function), Alzheimer's Disease (neurodegenerative disease that destroys memory and other important mental function), Altered Mental Status (changes in consciousness, appearance, behavior, mood, affect, motor activity or cognitive function) and Delirium (serious disturbance in mental abilities that result in confused thinking and reduced thinking and reduced awareness of surroundings). Record review of Resident #1's admission MDS assessment Cognitive Patterns section dated 08/05/2023 revealed Resident #1 had a BIMS of 05 indicated severe impaired cognition; signs and symptoms of delirium such as exhibited inattention behavior and disorganized thinking behavior that was continuously present. Further review of the admission MDS Behaviors section revealed Resident #1 did not exhibit physical behaviors toward others; however, did exhibit verbal behaviors towards others 4 to 6 days a week and the behaviors did not place residents at significant risk for physical illness or injury, nor significantly interfere with the resident's care, nor significantly intrude on the privacy or activity of others, nor significantly disrupt the care or living environment of others. Further review of admission MDS Behaviors section revealed Resident #1 exhibited rejection of care and wandered 1 to 3 days a week; however, Resident #1 did not wander or intrude on the privacy or activities of others. Further review of Resident #1's admission MDS assessment medication section revealed Resident #1 did not receive any medications for anxiety. Further review of Resident #1's admission MDS assessment restraint and alarm sections revealed Resident #1 wore a wander guard alarm. Record review of Resident #1's Comprehensive Care Plan completed on 08/16/2023 revealed Resident #1 was evaluated as a wandering risk related to decreased safety awareness, confusion and wandering behaviors; staff were to observe Resident #1 for signs and symptoms of agitation, pacing, repetitive verbalization's of wanting to leave/go home, restlessness. Staff were to also report increased behaviors to nurses for further interventions. Further review of Resident #1's Comprehensive Care Plan revealed that the resident had the potential to be verbally aggressive, yelling loudly, throws arms in the air. Resident #1 was to verbalize his understanding of the need to control his verbally abusive behaviors. Resident #1 was an elopement risk related to being disoriented to place with history of attempts to leave the facility unattended, impaired safety awareness, and wandered aimlessly. Record review revealed that Resident #1's consolidated Physician's Orders dated 11/02/2023 revealed no evidence of a physician's order for 1 on 1 observations. Review of Resident #1's of 1:1 (1 Resident with 1 Staff) handwritten observation sheets from 08/15/2023 to 11/05/2023 revealed Resident #1 had 1:1 staffing every day from 08/15/2023 to 11/05/2023 during the day. During a confidential interview on 11/02/2023 at 11:45 AM., it was said Resident #1 was aggressive daily towards staff and tried to get out of the building, so he was placed on 1:1 observation. The confidential interviewee said the facility staff were told not to document the 1:1 observation in the resident's record. During a confidential interview on 11/02/2023 at 12:30 PM., it was said that Resident #1's 1 to 1 observations were not being documented so that another facility would accept him. During a confidential interview on 11/02/2023 at 1:50 PM., it was said that Resident #1 was 1 on 1 in the day and not at night. During an interview on 11/06/2023 at 9:05 AM, the DON said that she should have put an order in for the 1 on 1 observation since they were doing the 1 to 1 observation and she had verbally ordered the staff to do it. She said that corporate told her that she did not have to document it. She said that these issues placed the resident at risk of not improving or receiving the care that should be provided. She said that there was limited documentation done on the resident due to them not scheduling it in EMAR or accurately documenting the resident's 1 on 1 observations. She revealed that the facility was actively trying to transfer the resident to another facility. The facility's policy and procedures titled: Charting and Documentation policy dated July 2017 revealed the following: Policy Statement: All services provided to the resident, progress toward the care plan goals, or any changes in the residents' medical, physical, functional, or psychosocial condition, she'll be documented in the residence medical chart. The medical record should facilitate communication between the introduced disciplinary team regarding the resident's condition in response to care. Policy interpretation and implementation: 7. Documentation of procedures and treatments will include care specific details, including: a) The date and time the procedure/treatment was provided. b) The name and title of the individuals who provided the care. c) The assessment data and/or any unusual findings obtained during the procedure/treatment. d)How the resident tolerated the procedures/treatment. e) Whether the resident refuse a procedure/treatment. f) Notification of family, physician, or other staff, if indicated. g) The signature in title of the individual documenting.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0584)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable environment for 2 of ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable environment for 2 of 2 resident rooms reviewed for homelike environment. (Resident #3 and Resident #2) The facility failed to properly clean the sheets for Resident #3. The facility failed to properly clean the walls, privacy curtain, and floors in Resident #2's room. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of an unclean and homelike environment. Findings included: During an observation on 11/01/2023 at 2:40 PM Resident #3 was lying in bed, her sheets were soiled and dried on the left side of the resident. During an observation on 11/02/2023 at 1:35 PM in Resident #2's room, revealed the following: -Two of the walls from floor to ceiling were covered with an orange sticky substance. -Privacy curtain had large liquid brown spots that were light in color and dark in color, as well as small brown spots on the lower part of the privacy curtain that contained a brown crusty smeared substance. -Debris, hair, dust, trash and spilled liquid spots under the bed. -Spots on the floors that were dirty. -Two (2) large trash bags of soiled laundry on a bed. During an interview on 11/01/2023 at 2:00 PM, Resident #3's responsible party, revealed Resident #3 often had dirty soiled sheets. She revealed that she had complained to the staff and the DON. She revealed that it had gotten better, but that at times, there were still issues. She revealed that the issues with the soiled linens were usually at night. She revealed that Resident #3 was dependent on staff for all ADLs and that she helped with Resident #3's care and with cleaning her room. During an interview on 11/01/2023 at 2:30 PM, the DON revealed that her expectations are for all resident's sheets to be changed when soiled. She revealed that the failure could place the resident at risk for unsanitary conditions. During an interview on 11/02/2023 at 1:45 PM, Resident #2 and her family said they have requested numerous times that laundry come and pick up Resident #2's dirty laundry. Resident #2 revealed that she did not file a grievance. The family were told that laundry was behind and would get to it when they could. The family said that the stains on the wall were from the previous resident. The family said that the resident would get mad and throw orange juice at the walls. The family said that it had been like that for a long time, at least a few months. The family said that the stains on the privacy curtain were from coffee being spilt over time. The family said that after the previous resident was moved out, the facility never came in to clean the room. The family said that under her bad was dirty and that the facility was trying to keep it clean, but the facility did not have enough staff. The family said that they could not remember the last time the resident's room had been thoroughly cleaned. The family said that they helped keep the room clean when staff could not. During an interview and observation on 11/06/2023 at 1:28 PM, the Housekeeping Manager observed Resident #2's room and said that the walls and the privacy curtain being dirty was unacceptable. She said that somehow it was missed, and she would resolve the issue immediately. She revealed that if it was her room, she would want that clean. She revealed that it was not a homelike environment and that she would make sure the issues were corrected. Review of the facility's Homelike Environment Policies and Procedures dated February 2021, reflect the following: Policy Statement: Residents are provided with a safe, clean, comfortable in home like environment and encouraged to use their personal belongings to the extent possible. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 1). Staff provides person centered care that emphasizes the residence comfort, independence and Personal needs and preferences. 2). The facility staff and management maximizes, to the extent possible, the characteristics of the facility that reflect a personalized, homelike setting. These characteristics include clean sanitary and orderly environment clean bed and bath linens that are in good condition.
MINOR (B) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact

Staffing Information (Tag F0732)

Minor procedural issue · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure that the daily nurse staffing was posted and readily accessible to residents and visitors as required for 1 of 2 days reviewed for nurs...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure that the daily nurse staffing was posted and readily accessible to residents and visitors as required for 1 of 2 days reviewed for nurse staffing The facility failed to update the daily staffing information posting from 10/27/2023 to 11/01/2023. This failure could affect residents, their families, and facility visitors by placing them at risk of not having access to information regarding staffing data and facility census. Findings included: During an observation on 11/01/2023 at 1:40 PM, the daily staffing pattern was posted on the wall by the copier room and the DON's office with a date of 10/27/2023. During an interview on 11/01/2023 at 1:45 PM, the DON stated she knew that the Nurse Staffing Posting was to be updated and posted daily. She said the nurse staffing posting had not been changed on 10/28/2023, 10/29/2023, 10/30/2023, 10/31/2023 and 11/01/2023, due to being short staffed and the person who changed it did not do it, she revealed she did not know who was responsible for it that morning, but said that she was the one responsible for making sure that it was completed after she delegated it. She further stated the failure could cause confusion on staffing and resident care issues. During an interview on 11/01/2023/23 at 2:30 PM, the Administrator stated the facility DON was responsible for the daily Nurse Staffing Posting. A copy of the facilities policy and procedure titled Posting Direct Care Daily Staffing Numbers dated September 2022 was received on 11/07/2023 at 2:00 PM, revealed the following: Policy Statement: Our facility will post on a daily basis for each shift, the number of nursing personnel responsible for providing direct care to residence. Policy interpretation and implementation. 1) Within two hours the beginning of each shift, the number of licensed nurses (RN's LPN's and LVN's) and the number of unlicensed nursing personnel (CNA's) directly responsible for resident care it will be posted in a prominent location accessible to residence and 2visitors and in a clear and readable format. 2) Directly responsible for resident care means that individuals are responsible for resident's total care or some aspect of the residence care including, but not limited to, assisting with activities of daily living (ADL's) performing gastrointestinal feeds, giving medication, supervising care given by CNA's, and performing nursing assessments to admit residents or notifying physicians of change of conditions.
May 2023 4 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0637 (Tag F0637)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive assessment was completed within 14 days af...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive assessment was completed within 14 days after a significant change in the physical or mental condition for 1 of 3 residents (Residents #8) whose records were reviewed for assessments. The facility failed to capture a comprehensive MDS assessment after Resident #8 returned to the facility from the hospital and had a significant decline. This failure placed could place residents at risk for not being assessed for a change in condition and the need to revise their care plans to address changes in condition and develop interventions to meet their needs for care assistance and treatments. The findings included: Record review of Resident #8's face sheet, generated 5/23/2023, reflected Resident #8 was an [AGE] year-old female who was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a readmission date of 03/07/2023. The resident had the following diagnosis, which included: bacteriemia (presence of bacteria in the bloodstream), pressure ulcer sacral region; stage 2 (wound on the bottom area that is due to pressure), and abnormal findings in urine (urine showed presence of something abnormal). Record review of Resident #8's MDS Schedule reflected the last assessment as a Quarterly assessment on 3/07/2023 and, not a significant change assessment. Record review of Resident #8's Quarterly MDS revealed in the following sections- N: antibiotics were given the last 7 days. Section O: IV medications were given. Interview with the ADON on 5/23/2023 at 3:00 PM, she revealed that the resident was sent to the hospital due to a decline in her health. She stated that the resident has had a significant decline and a significant change MDS assessment should have been done when she returned to the facility on IV antibiotics. She revealed this failure could place the residents at risk for inadequate care. She revealed that it was her responsibility to make sure that the assessments were done accurately. Interview with the DON on 05/23/2023 at 12:00 PM revealed that it was the ADON's (who was the past MDS coordinator) responsibility to make sure the assessments are were completed accurately. The new MDS coordinator was in training and had not assumed the responsibility of completing the MDS assessments. She stated that this failure could cause her to miss care areas that would trigger on a significant change assessment. Interview with the ADON on 05/24/2023 at 2:30 PM revealed that they did not have a policy covering MDS assessments. She revealed that they followed the RAI guidelines.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

PASARR Coordination (Tag F0644)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to refer 1 of 4 residents whose PASARR evaluations were reviewed (Resi...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to refer 1 of 4 residents whose PASARR evaluations were reviewed (Resident #54) who had newly evident mental disorders in that: The facility failed to refer Resident #54 for PASARR review following new mental illness diagnoses. This deficient practice could affect 4 residents who had qualifying diagnoses with a negative PASARR Level 1 evaluation. The findings included: Record review of Resident #54's Face Sheet, dated 05/24/2023, revealed a [AGE] year-old male, admitted to the facility on [DATE] with Admitting diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder (a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest) and anxiety disorder (excessive and persistent worry and fear about everyday situations). Resident #54 had a diagnosis of bipolar II disorder (a mood disorder characterized by hypomania and major depression) added on 01/13/2022 and schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type (abnormal thought processes and an unstable mood) added on 10/25/2022. Record review of Resident #54's Physician Orders Summary Report, dated 05/24/2023, revealed orders for buspirone 10mg for anxiety disorder, fluoxetine 20mg for depression, and Latuda 20mg for schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type. Record review of Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], revealed Resident #54 had a BIMS score of 13 out of 15, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. Resident #54 had active diagnoses which included anxiety disorder, depression, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia (schizoaffective disorder). Resident #54 received antianxiety and antidepressant medications. Record review of Resident #54's Care Plan, last revised on 03/21/2023, revealed care plans for: a) Resident #54 is dependent on staff for meeting emotional, intellectual, physical, and social needs related to a diagnosis of Depression, Anxiety; b) Resident #54 has potential for ADL selfcare performance deficit related to diagnosis of Depression c) Resident #54uses anti-anxiety medication, Buspar, related to anxiety disorder; d) Resident #54 uses antidepressant medication, Zoloft, related to Depression e) Resident #54 has diagnosis of depression and bipolar disorder. At risk for mood/behavioral changes; f) Resident #54 has a psychosocial wellbeing problem related to diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder and anxiety. Record review of Resident #54's PL1, dated 10/31/2021, revealed Resident #54 was negative for mental illness. An updated PL1 was not completed after admission or diagnosis of bipolar II disorder was added on 01/13/2022 and schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type added on 10/25/2022. In an interview on 05/24/2023 at 10:04 am, the ADON said she was the MDS Coordinator and was responsible for the PASRRs until recently. She said an updated PL1 should have been completed for Resident #54 since he had a diagnosis of mental illness upon admission, but it was not completed. She said this failure could prevent or delay services the resident was entitled too. Record review of the facility's PASRR Policy A1500: Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR), dated as last reviewed on 01/24/2023, revealed the following: A resident with MI or ID/DD must have a Resident Review (RR) conducted when there is a significant change in the resident's physical or mental condition. Therefore, when a significant change in status assessment is completed for a resident with MI or ID/DD, the nursing home is required to notify the State mental health authority, intellectual disability, or developmental disability authority (depending on which operates in their state) in order to notify them of the resident's change in status.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0657 (Tag F0657)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan within 7 days after completion of...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan within 7 days after completion of the comprehensive assessment for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #65) whose records were reviewed for assessments and care plans, as well as having an IDT team present at the care conference. The facility failed to ensure Resident #65 had a comprehensive care plan developed and updated within 7 days following the completion of the admission comprehensive assessment. This failure could place residents at risk of not have having their care plans completed accurately and timely. Findings included: Record review of Resident #65's face sheet revealed Resident #65 was a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility 02/22/2023. Resident #65 had diagnoses which included hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), hypertension (high blood pressure), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and congestive heart failure (heart cannot pump blood adequately due to failure). Record review of Resident #65's admission MDS assessment, dated 03/04/2023, revealed the following: Section C revealed the resident was unable to complete the BIMS interview. Section K revealed a weight of 139 pounds. Section G revealed: Bed mobility- extensive, Transfers- extensive, walk-in room- did not occur, walk in corridor- did not occur, locomotion on unit- extensive, locomotion off unit- extensive, dressing- extensive, toilet use- extensive and personal hygiene- extensive. Section Z revealed that the RN signature date was for 03/10/2023. Record review of Resident #65's care plan progress note, dated 03/09/2023, for activities reflected: the resident had adequate hearing without a hearing aid. The resident had unclear speech, was rarely/never understood, and understood others. The resident had adequate vision with glasses. The resident reported lacking energy. No delirium or delusions. The resident was somewhat able to participate well with interviews. The resident planned to remain in the facility. There was no discharge planning at this time. Record review of Resident #65's Care Conference, dated 03/09/2023, did not have a Registered Nurse attend the Comprehensive admission Care Conference. Record review of Resident #65's admission care plan progress note, dated 03/09/2023, showed the care conference was conducted before the MDS admission assessment was completed. Record review of Resident #65's admission care plan, dated 03/09/2023, revealed the CAAS sections were not completed until 04/12/2023. Interview on 05/23/2023 at 11:00 AM, the SW revealed that an RN did not attend the Care Conference on 03/09/2023. She revealed that it was the admission care conference and there had not been another care conference since then. She was unaware that a RN had to be present for the comprehensive admission care conference meeting. In an interview on 05/23/23 at 11:23 AM, the ADON revealed that they got behind with care plans and the meetings, but corrected them with corporate leadership and interventions. She stated that she was sent to another building for extra training. She revealed the care plan was created a month late on 04/12/2023. Interview on 05/23/2023 at 12:00 PM the DON revealed that she was unaware that the admission care plan meeting had been completed without an RN. She stated that it was her expectation that an RN attend and that the care plan be completeled timely. Observation and interview on 05/23/2023 at 1:48 PM revealed, Resident #65 was observed sitting in her wheelchair. She was unresponsive to questions and was unable to communicate. Record review of the facility's care planning policy, dated revised October 2022, titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person- Centered revealed: Policy Statement: A comprehensive person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the residence physical, psychosocial, in functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 1) The intra-disciplinary team, in conjunction with the resident and his or her family or legal representative, develop and implement a comprehensive, person- centered care plan for each resident. The 80 team may include but not limited to the attending physician a registered nurse who has responsibility for the resident . 3) The IDT may include but not limited to: A registered nurse who has responsibility for the resident 4) The care plan interventions are derived from a thorough analysis of the information gathered as part of the comprehensive assessment. 9) The comprehensive person-centered care plan will: Include measurable objectives and time frames. Describe any specialize services. Incorporate identify problem areas reflect treatment goals, timetables, and objectives in measurable 12) The comprehensive, person-centered care plan is developed within seven days of the completion of the required comprehensive assessment MDS.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Menu Adequacy (Tag F0803)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the menu for all residents reviewed for food preferences. The facility failed to provide an acceptable substitute for ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the menu for all residents reviewed for food preferences. The facility failed to provide an acceptable substitute for dessert at lunch when they served whipped cream with graham cracker crumbs instead of the scheduled Key Lime pie. This failure could place residents at risk of feeling that their preferences are not being met. Findings include: Observation on 05/22/2023 at 12:00 PM revealed residents, sitting in the dining room, were served small, clear plastic bowls filled with whipped cream, sprinkled with graham cracker crumbs. Observation on 05/22/2023 at 12:02 PM revealed food trays for residents, dining in their rooms, contained bowls that appeared to be whipped cream covered with graham cracker crumbs. Observation on 05/22/2023 at 12:05 PM revealed the daily posted menu listed Key Lime pie as the dessert for the day. Observation on 05/22/2023 at 12:15 PM revealed a test tray which contained a bowl of whipped cream sprinkled with graham cracker crumbs. The dessert was sampled and was not flavored in any way. In interview on 05/22/2023 at 12:04 PM, with Residents #41 and #20, sitting in the dining room, revealed the facility never served Key Lime pie and just put whipped cream flavored with lime juice in a bowl and called it dessert. In an interview on 05/22/2023 at 12:09 PM, the DM said they did not make or buy Key Lime pie for the residents and she forgot to buy lime juice to add to the whipped cream. She said they did not make a substitute for the residents. The substitute that day was pudding. Record review of the facility policy titled Substitutions, Administrative Policies, 2001 MED-PASS, Inc (Revised March 2004) revealed the following: Policy Statement Food substitution will be made as appropriate or necessary. Policy Interpretation and Implementation 1. The food services manager, in conjunction with the clinical dietician, may make food substitutions as appropriate or necessary. The food services shift supervisor on duty will make substitutions only when necessary. 2. The food services manager will maintain an exchange list identifying the seven (7) exchanges of food groups. When in doubt about an appropriate substitution, the food services manager will consult with the dietician prior to making the substitution. 3. Residents' likes and dislikes will be considered when making substitutions. 4. All substitutions are noted on the menu and filed in accordance with established dietary policies. Notations of substitutions must include the reason for the substitution. 5. The food services manager will review the substitutions regularly to avoid recurrences when possible.
Dec 2022 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for one (Resident #1) of one resident reviewed for infection control practices. CNA A failed to perform hand hygiene and change her gloves at the appropriate times while providing incontinence care for Resident #1. These failures placed residents at risk for the spread of infection. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 10/22/22, revealed the resident was a 90- year- old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of overactive bladder, diarrhea, dementia, muscle wasting and atrophy. Review of Resident #1's MDS assessment, dated 09/16/22, revealed Resident #1 required extensive assistance with most ADLs and one person assist. Resident #1 was frequently incontinent of bladder and occasionally incontinent of bowel. Review of Resident #1's care plan, dated 03/29/22, revealed the resident was care planned for bowel elimination and overactive bladder. Observation of incontinence care for Resident #1 on 12/22/22 at 10:55 a.m. revealed CNA A did not wash her hands prior to donning gloves. CNA A removed Resident #1's brief that was soiled with urine. CNA A wiped the resident from front to back. CNA A did not change gloves but continued to clean Resident #1. CNA A's gloves were visibly soiled with urine. She did not wash her hands, change gloves, or perform hand hygiene before retrieving Resident #1's clean brief and placing it underneath the resident. She applied skin protector with the same soiled gloves before she fastened the brief to Resident #1. CNA A again, did not wash her hands before exiting Resident #1's room. In an interview on 12/22/22 at 11:15a.m. with CNA A she stated she had been employed at the facility since August 2022. She stated she received infection control training last week. CNA A stated cross contamination meant mixing clean with dirty. CNA A acknowledged she should have washed hands and changed gloves at the appropriate times while providing care. She stated Resident #1 could get an infection for not using good infection control practice. During an interview with the DON 12/22/22 at 12:08 p.m. she stated she was aware of some of the concerns raised about infection control. She stated the aides were expected to follow standard protocols to include appropriate hand hygiene when providing incontinent care. Record review of the facility's infection control policy, revised October 2022 revealed, An infection prevention and control program (IPCP) is established and maintained to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infection. Employee Training on infection control: The policy interpretation and implementation include: 1) All staff and personnel will complete orientation and training on preventing the transmission of healthcare associated infections . 2) Infection control training topics will include at least a) Standard Precautions, including hand hygiene .
Mar 2022 15 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0552 (Tag F0552)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the right to be informed in advance, by the physician or oth...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the right to be informed in advance, by the physician or other practitioner or professional of the risks and benefits of proposed care, of treatment and treatment alternatives or treatment options and to choose the alternative or option her or she preferred for (Residents #23) 1 of 1 reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to inform, obtain consents, and explain to Resident #23 the risks and benefits of proposed care, plan of treatment and/or treatment alternatives or treatment options prior to administering an injection of Depo-Provera for the purpose to decrease his libido. This failure could place residents at risk of being unable to exercise their rights to make informed decisions regarding their treatment. Findings include: Record review of Resident #23's face sheet, dated 03/25/2022, indicated a [AGE] year-old male, who was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: Traumatic Brain Injury (Trauma to the Brain), Other Sexual Dysfunction due to a substance or known physiological condition (Sexual Dysfunction from a cause that is known) and Pseudobulbar Affect (Episodes of inappropriate laughing or crying). Record review of Resident #23's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/26/2022, revealed in Section B, Hearing, Speech, and Vision, Resident #23 was able to make himself understood and he had the ability to understand with clear comprehension. Section C revealed Resident #23 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, which indicated he was cognitively intact. Section G revealed Resident #23 required extensive assistance and 1-person physical assist with activities of daily living except for locomotion, dressing, personal hygiene, which is supervision or limited assist. Resident #23 required the use of a wheelchair for a mobility device. Section N revealed Resident #23 had not received any injections within the past 7 days. Section Q indicated Resident #23 participated in the assessment. Record review of Resident #23's care plan revealed a care plan which addressed Resident #23's sexual behaviors were initiated on 10/25/2021, which revealed the following: Created date: 09/19/2019; Focus: Poor impulse control and has sexually inappropriate behaviors with staff. Goal: .The resident will verbalize understanding of need to control physically aggressive and sexual behaviors through the review date. Administer medication as order and document for side effects and effectiveness. Record review of Resident #23's Physician order report, dated 05/11/2021, revealed the following orders: Start Date 05/11/2021, End Date Ongoing, for Depo-Provera (medroxyprogesterone) suspension; 150mg/mL; amount: 1mL; inject 1 applicator intramuscularly one time a day every 90 days related to other sexual dysfunction, ordered and electronically signed by [Physician A]. Record review of The Mayo Clinic website revealed, Depo-Provera is a well-known brand name for medroxyprogesterone acetate, a contraceptive injection that contains the hormone progestin. Depo-Provera is given as an injection every three months. Depo-Provera typically suppresses ovulation, keeping your ovaries from releasing an egg. It also thickens cervical mucus to keep sperm from reaching the egg. Accessed on 08/30/2021. https://www.mayoclinic.org/tests-procedures/depo-provera/about/pac-20392204 Record review of The Federal Drug Administration (FDA), Depo-Provera is a progestin indicated only for the prevention of pregnancy .The recommended dose is 150mg of Depo-Provera every 3 months (13 weeks) administered by deep, intramuscular (IM) injection in the gluteal or deltoid muscle Accessed on 08/30/2021. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2015/020246s054,021583s026lbl.pdf In an interview on 03/24/2021 at 11:30 AM, with Resident #23 revealed the resident was alert and oriented. He sat in his bed on his phone. State Surveyor explained the medication usage and side effects to him. He replied he did not want to take something like that. The State Surveyor informed him it was a medication that had already been administered. He said again he would not consent to it. The resident stated he understood what the State Surveyor asked and, he could tell people yes or no if he needed to. In an interview on 03/24/2022 at 11:10 AM, the DON said the facility received a verbal consent for Depo Provera from Resident #23's from a Family Member. She said that was who they received all the consents for Resident #23. She said he did not have a Medical Power of Attorney. She said they did not get consents for any type of treatments, medications, or care planning from Resident #23, they only received consents from the Family Member. The DON said she did not ask the resident or inform him of what he was taking, and she believed she did not have to get a consent for this type of medication. In an interview on 03/24/2022 at 2:20 PM, the Social Worker said she got all consents from the Family Member concerning Resident #23. She stated there was not a Medical Power of Attorney and she had spoken with the Family Member about the Medical Power of Attorney or Guardianship. She said the Family Member was unable to get Guardianship due to the financial cost of it. She said, the resident had not had a competency evaluation, but she felt like he could not make decisions on his own due to his diagnosis, even with a BIMS score of 12. In an interview on 03/25/2022 at 10:00 AM, the DON said they had not tried any non-pharmacological interventions for Resident #23 prior to receiving the orders for the Depo-Provera Injection. She said, the resident's medical doctor had not completed a competency evaluation on the resident, but they were going to get that done. The DON said her understanding with administering the Depo-Provera shot to male residents was, it would lower the testosterone levels which would lower their sex drive. The DON said Resident #23 had not ever been informed of the treatment plan for the Depo-Provera. In an interview on 03/25/2021 at 2:25 PM, the Family Member for Resident #23 indicated she did not have medical power of attorney for Resident #23, but the facility allowed her to bypass the resident and for her to make medical decisions for him. The Family Member said that he had not been informed that Depo Provera had a black box warning, nor had she been informed of the potential side effects. After listing the side effects to her, she said that she would not have consented for the medication and she knew the resident would not have either. She revoked her previous verbal consent the facility allowed her to give. She said she would notify the facility after the call that she had revoked her verbal consent. In an interview on 03/25/2021 at 4:24 PM, Physician A said, he treated Resident #23 for behaviors, which included sexual behaviors. He said he had given a verbal order in May of 2021 for Depo Provera given every 3 months to help with this. He said the order was only a one-time order and it should have been given along with initiation of psych services. He said he would have never of ordered Depo Provera for long term usage, as it was meant to be for short term usage. He was unsure why it was still given up to this date, but he would be following up with the facility. He stated, Depo Provera inhibited them from sexual behaviors. The benefit from Depo Provera was it only targeted the sexuality component, but it was meant to work in conjunction with therapy. Record review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Rights dated and revised 04/2017, documented [in-part]: Facilities shall have a written policy on resident rights and shall post and distribute a copy of those rights. In addition to the basic civil and legal rights enjoys by other adults, residents shall have the rights listed below. Facility policies and procedures must be in compliance with these rights. Residents shall: Participate, and have family participate, if desired, in the planning of activities and service. Receive care and services that are adequate, appropriate, and in compliance with contractual terms of residency, relevant federal and state laws, rules, and regulations and shall include the right to refuse such care and services. Be free from mental, emotional, and physical abuse and neglect, from chemical or physical restraints, and from financial exploitation and from financial exploitation and misappropriation of property.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0561 (Tag F0561)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to make choices abou...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to make choices about aspects of his or her life in the facility that were significant to the resident for (Resident #23) 1 of 1 reviewed for self-determination. The facility failed to ensure Resident #23 was treated as his own responsible party which pertained to medical services and consents. This deficient practice could place residents who were competent to make their own decisions by contributing to poor self-esteem, lack of information, and unmet needs. The findings were: Record review of Resident #23's face sheet, dated 03/25/2022, indicated a [AGE] year-old male, who was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: Traumatic Brain Injury (Trauma to the Brain), Other Sexual Dysfunction due to a substance or known physiological condition (Sexual Dysfunction from a cause that is known) and Pseudobulbar Affect (Episodes of inappropriate laughing or crying). He was documented as being his own responsible party. The face sheet did not reflect a Medical Power of Attorney. Record review of Resident #23's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/26/2022, revealed in Section B, Hearing, Speech, and Vision, Resident #23 was able to make himself understood and he had the ability to understand with clear comprehension. Section C revealed Resident #23 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, which indicated he was cognitively intact. Section G revealed Resident #23 required extensive assistance and 1-person physical assist with activities of daily living except for locomotion, dressing, personal hygiene, which is supervision or limited assist. Resident #23 required the use of a wheelchair for a mobility device. Section N revealed Resident #23 had not received any injections within the past 7 days. Section Q indicated Resident #23 participated in the assessment. In an interview on 03/24/2021 at 11:30 AM with Resident #23 revealed the resident, was alert and oriented. He sat in his bed on his phone. He said that he could tell people yes or no if he needed to. In an interview on 03/24/2022 at 11:10 AM, the DON said, they had received a verbal consent for Depo Provera from the residents Family Member. She said that was who they received all the consents for Resident #23. She said he did not have a Medical Power of Attorney. She said they did not get consents for any type of treatments, medications, or care planning from Resident #23, they only received consents from Family Member. She said she did not ask the resident of inform him of what he took, and she believed she did not have to even get a consent for the Depo Provera medication. The facility asked the Family Member for consent because they felt the resident was unable to give consent due to his diagnosis. In an interview on 03/24/2022 at 2:20 PM, the Social Worker said she got all consents from the Family Member concerning Resident #23. She stated there was not a Medical Power of Attorney and she had spoken with the Family Member about a Medical Power of Attorney or Guardianship. She said the Family Member was unable to get Guardianship due to the financial cost. She said she felt like Resident #23 could not make decisions on his own due to his diagnosis, even with a BIMS score of 12. She said the resident was legally his own responsible party. In an interview on 03/25/2021 at 2:25 PM, the Family Member indicated she did not have medical power of attorney for Resident #23 but the facility allowed her to bypass the resident and for her to make medical decisions for him Record review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Rights dated and revised 04/2017, documented [in-part]: Facilities shall have a written policy on resident rights and shall post and distribute a copy of those rights. In addition to the basic civil and legal rights enjoys by other adults, residents shall have the rights listed below. Facility policies and procedures must be in compliance with these rights. Residents shall: Participate, and have family participate, if desired, in the planning of activities and service. Receive care and services that are adequate, appropriate, and in compliance with contractual terms of residency, relevant federal and state laws, rules, and regulations and shall include the right to refuse such care and services: Be free from mental, emotional, and physical abuse and neglect, from chemical or physical restraints, and from financial exploitation and from financial exploitation and misappropriation of property. Record review of the facility's Advanced Directives policy (last revised 12/16) revealed Advanced Directives will be respected in accordance with state law and facility policy. Upon admission, the resident will be provided with written information concerning the right to refuse or accept medical or surgical treatments and to formulate an advance directive if he or she chooses to do so. If the resident indicated that he or she has not established advance directives, the facility staff will offer assistance in establishing advance directives. The resident will be given an option to accept or decline the assistance, and care will be contingent on either decision. Nursing staff will document in the medical record the offer to assist and the resident's decision to accept or decline assistance. The resident has the right to refuse treatment, whether or not he or she has an advance directive. A resident will not be treated against his or her own wishes. Residents who refuse treatment will not be transferred to another facility unless other criteria for transfer are met. - Durable Power of Attorney for Health Care (Medical power of Attorney)- a document delegating authority to a legal representative to make health care decisions in case the individual delegating the authority subsequently becomes incapacitated.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Notification of Changes (Tag F0580)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to immediately inform the resident, consult with the resi...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to immediately inform the resident, consult with the resident's physician and notify consistent with his or her authority, the resident representative when there was an accident which involved the resident which resulted in injury and had the potential for requiring physician intervention for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #43) reviewed for notification of changes. The facility failed to ensure Resident #43's physician and family representative were notified after the resident had a fall and seizure on 03/18/22. This failure could place residents at risk for a delay in treatment, excessive pain, and a decline in health status. The findings include: Record review of Resident #43's admission Record (face sheet), printed 03/25/22, revealed a [AGE] year-old female who was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident had diagnoses which included: other seizures (principal dx); hypokalemia; mental disorder; cerebral palsy; essential hypertension; bacterial pneumonia; acute respiratory failure with hypoxia; sepsis; moderate protein-calorie malnutrition; major depressive disorder, recurrent, moderate; and aphasia, unsteadiness on feet and other lack of coordination were added on 02/17/22 and history of falling was added on 02/20/22. The form documented Resident #43 was her own responsible party and listed her sister as her emergency contact and resident representative. Record review of Resident #43's Nursing Progress Notes revealed the following [in part]: - 03/19/22 at 12:43 PM, LVN F documented the resident remained in bed, was lethargic and agitated, and was assisted by staff with meals. - 03/20/22 at 10:43 AM, LVN F documented resident in bed and not able to ambulate since Friday 3/18/22 following a series of multiple small seizures. Physician notified. - 03/20/22 at 12:46 PM, the ADON documented resident's family visited, and sister got resident up and dressed that morning. Resident was seated in wheelchair at the nurses' station with a snack. - 03/20/22 at 3:29 PM, LVN F documented family visiting and observed resident's decline since Friday 3/18/22; sister requested resident's long-time neurologist be called. - 03/21/22 at 11:17 AM, LVN G documented resident was in bed and complained of pain in bilateral hips/legs. Physician was notified and gave order for x-ray bilateral hip/femur. - 03/21/22 at 1:20 PM, LVN G documented x-ray result showed fracture to left hip. Physician notified and advised to send resident to emergency room via ambulance. Sister was notified. Resident was transported to hospital via stretcher by ambulance. Record review of the Social Services Progress Note, dated 03/22/22, revealed a documented late entry for 03/21/22. The note documented the Social Worker received a call from Resident #43's sister, who wanted to know why she was not notified about the resident's seizure on Friday 03/18/22. The Social Worker documented she conveyed the sister's concerns to the Administrator and DON. Observation on 3/24/22 at 8:57 AM, during a visit to Resident #43 at the hospital, revealed she laid in bed with the head of the bed elevated, four 1/2 side rails were raised with the side rails padded at the head of the bed and pillows positioned next to her left side/hip. Resident #43 was awake and alert and briefly made eye contact when her name was spoken. She was not interviewable. Her only verbal response to attempts made to interview her was, I hurt, I hurt, I hurt, I hurt. She did not say where she hurt. In an interview on 03/22/22 at 11:13 AM, the DON stated Resident #43 had been discharged to the hospital on [DATE]. The DON stated the resident was ambulatory and she had a seizure while walking, fell, and fractured her left hip. In an interview on 03/25/22 at 3:05 PM, the Social Worker stated she had not found documentation in Resident #43's electronic health record regarding notification of the resident's sister on 03/18/22 after the resident fell and had seizure activity. In a telephone interview on 03/25/22 at 4:20 PM, LVN D stated she worked the night shift, 6 PM - 6 AM, and had worked the night of Friday 03/18/22. The LVN stated Resident #43 fell during the shift change on 03/18/22 at 5:45 PM. She stated the resident came out of the dining room, staggered, and put her arm behind her and grabbed the handrail in the hallway. The resident slid down and landed on her hip on the floor in Hall D. She stated the resident did not hit her head, but she started having a seizure. The LVN stated she ran to assist the resident and the day shift nurse came to help her. LVN D stated she tried to get the resident's vital signs, but she was combative and was swung her arms, kicked her legs, and screamed help me, help me. LVN D stated they were able to take Resident #43 to the closest empty room on Hall D and gave her a PRN rectal Valium suppository for her seizures. She stated the resident had an order for the PRN Valium suppository. LVN D stated there was no indication Resident #43 was in pain, and she rolled back and forth on the bed. LVN D stated, she did not notify anyone and did not call the residents sister regarding the residents fall and seizure. LVN D stated I dropped the ball. I should have called and notified the DON, the doctor, and the sister. LVN D stated she had a lot to learn about incident reporting. Record review of the facility's policy and procedure for Change of Condition and Physician/Family Notification, dated as Revised 8/11/2020 and 3/25/2021, revealed the following [in part]: Purpose To ensure that resident's family and/or legal representative and physician are notified of resident changes that fall under the following categories: - An accident resulting in injury that has the potential for needed physician intervention. - A significant change in the resident's physical, mental or psychosocial status. (See below for examples.) - A need to significantly alter treatment. - Transfer of the resident from the facility. Procedure When any of the above situations exists, the licensed nurse will contact the resident's family and their physician. Calls will be made to the family until they are reached. A message may be left on an answering machine which does not give specifics but lease a request for the facility to be called. The physician will be called immediately for any emergencies irrespective of the time of day. Non-emergency notifications may be made the next morning if the situation occurs on the late evening or night shift. This applies to any day of the week including holidays . Each attempt will be charted as to time the call was made, who was spoken to, and what information was given to the physician
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0688 (Tag F0688)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident with limited range of motion and /or...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident with limited range of motion and /or to prevent further decrease in range of motion (ROM) for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #27) reviewed for contractures. The facility failed to ensure Resident #27's splint was placed on her right hand to prevent a future decline in ROM. This failure could place residents with contractures at risk for further decline in ROM and development of multiple contractures. Findings include: Record review of Resident #27's face sheet, dated 03/25/22, revealed Resident #27 was a [AGE] year-old female with an initial admission date of 06/26/20 and a readmission date of 08/12/21. Resident #27 had diagnoses which included: Strain of Other Specified Muscles, Fascia (tissue surrounding muscle) and Tendons of Wrist and Left hand, dated 12/13/21 (Principal Diagnoses), Muscle Wasting and Atrophy (degeneration), dated 10/22/21 (Secondary Diagnosis) Chronic Pain Syndrome, dated 06/26/20, Pain Right Knee, dated 08/26/20, Pain Left Knee, dated 08/26/20. Unspecified osteoarthritis, and Schizoaffective Disorder, Bipolar Type, dated 06/26/20. Record review of Resident #27's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], revealed a BIM's score of 12 which indicated mild cognitive impairment. Section G: Functional Limitation in Range of Motion indicated Resident #27 had no upper extremity impairment and no lower extremity impairment on either side. Record review of Resident #27's Consolidated Physician Orders (current as of 0003/24/22 revealed the resident had no orders to apply a splint or any type of orthotic device to her left hand (fingers and wrist) contractures. Record review of Resident #27's Care Plan, dated revised 02/04/22, revealed the resident was to receive gentle range of motion with dressing, Monitor/document/report a worsening of contractures. There was no intervention for a splint or orthotic device documented. Observation and interview on 03/23/22 at 09:52 AM revealed t Resident #27 had contractures to her right hand and fingers. There was a splint observed on the chest of drawers in her room. She stated it was a splint for her right hand and was told by the therapy department to wear it at night. She stated her boyfriend, Resident #13, applied it each night and it was not applied by the nurses. She stated she would take it off during the night if her hand hurt, but she wore it part of each night. In an interview with Resident #13 on 03/23/22 at 10:00 AM, he stated he applied the splint to Resident #27's right hand every night. He stated the therapy department got her the splint and she was supposed to wear it on her right hand at night because of her contracture. Interview with CNA E on 03/23/22 at 1:50 PM revealed she worked at the facility part time. She stated Resident #27 was not wearing her splint at this time. She stated she put it on when the resident wanted to wear it, but she could not remember the last time she put the splint on Resident #27. Further interview revealed the CNA didn't know when the splint was supposed to be worn. She stated she would ask the nurses if the resident should wear a Splint. Interview with the DON on 03/23/22 at 10:15 AM, she stated she was not aware of Resident #27's contractures to her right hand or she had a splint in her room. She reviewed the residents orders as of 3/23/22 and confirmed there was no order written for the orthotic splint. She stated it would be therapy's responsibility to obtain orders and to apply the splint. She stated staff should follow orders for Resident #27 and resident should have an order in her EMR if she had a splint. She stated Resident #13 should not be the one to apply Resident #27's splint. She stated there should be an order, it should be care planned and available to all staff (which included CNA's) in the EMR in order for nursing to apply the splint. She stated it was the MDS Coordinators responsibility to ensure the care plan meeting was held and the care plan was updated . She stated it was the MDS coordinator's responsibility to monitor for any new orders requiring an update to the care plan. She also stated it was the charge nurse's responsibility to monitor the orders and care plans to ensure physician orders were followed when they were received. She stated the splint was not applied by nursing because the order was not communicated to nursing by the occupational therapists by written and verbal communication. Interview with the Occupational Therapy Assistant on 03/24/22 at 9:45 AM with the COTA revealed Resident #27 was discharged from therapy on 02/18/22 after her therapy goals had been met. The COTA stated Resident #27 should be wearing her splint at night. She stated there was not an order written by therapy to communicate the physician's orders to nursing at the time she acquired the splint. She stated there was a communication breakdown between nursing and therapy due to the order not being written. She stated this could result in the resident not receiving needed care and services needed Record review of the facility policy and procedure titled Resident Mobility and Range of Motion, dated revised July 2017, documented [in-part]: Residents with limited range of motion will receive treatment and services to increase and/or prevent further decline in range of motions. Residents with limited mobility will receive appropriate services equipment and assistance to maintain/or improve mobility unless reduction in mobility is unavoidable.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Respiratory Care (Tag F0695)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who needed respiratory care, which i...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who needed respiratory care, which included tracheostomy care and tracheal suctioning, was provided consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, the residents' goals and preferences for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #45) reviewed for oxygen administration. The facility failed to ensure Residents #45's nasal cannula, the humidifier bottles and nasal cannula tubing were out of date and not changed as ordered. This failure could place residents at risk for respiratory infection due to the potential for microorganisms infiltrating their oxygen equipment and supplies, and compromised health status from receiving treatments and procedures not ordered by a physician. The findings included: Resident review of Resident #45's admission Record , printed 03/25/2022, revealed a [AGE] year-old male who had been admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #45 had diagnoses which included: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (Chronic Inflammatory Lung Disease), Acute and Chronic Respiratory Failure (Short- and Long-term Respiratory Failure) with Hypercapnia (elevated carbon dioxide levels in the blood), Atherosclerotic Heart Disease (Disease of the heart due to plaque buildup in the arteries), Morbid Obesity and Hypertension. Record review of Resident #45's active orders, printed 03/25/2022, revealed an order dated 12/14/2021 for oxygen at 2 liters per minute via nasal cannula to keep O2 saturations greater than 90% every shift. An order, dated 01/18/2022, revealed the oxygen tubing be changed weekly, every Sunday. Record review of Resident #45's Treatment Administration Record for 03/25/2022 revealed there was no documentation that the humidifier bottle or tubing was scheduled to be changed weekly. Observation on 03/22/2022 at 9:55 AM revealed Resident #45 laid in bed watching his television. His respirations were even and non-labored. The nasal cannula tubing for the oxygen administration was dated for 03/13/2022. Observation and interview on 03/22/2022 at 2:58 PM revealed the ADON walked down to Resident #45's room to verify the date on the O2 tubing. The ADON said she delegated it to whichever LVN working Sunday nights . She looked and noted the date was 03/13/2022 and it was not changed according to their policy and procedures , which was weekly. She got new tubing and changed the tubing and dated it with 03/22/2022 while we were in the room. She said the nurses must have gotten busy and forgot to change it. She said she goes through the facility on Mondays to verify it has been completed. She must have missed the resident. The LVNs that were working on Sunday were unavailable to interview. In an interview on 03/25/2022 at 9:57 AM, the DON stated Resident #45's oxygen tubing should have been changed out on 03/20/2022. She stated she delegated the task to the ADON who oversaw it was changed out weekly on Sundays. She said it was ordered to be changed every Sunday and the ADON was responsible for this task . She said that it should have been changed the previous Sunday per the policy and procedure. Record review of the facilities policy titled Oxygen Administration, dated revised October 2010, revealed [in part]: To verify that there is a physician's order for this procedure. Review the physicians order or facilities protocol for oxygen administration.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0740 (Tag F0740)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure each resident received and the facility provided the necess...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure each resident received and the facility provided the necessary behavioral health care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being, in accordance with the comprehensive assessment and plan of care for Resident #23 reviewed for behavioral health services. The facility failed ensure Resident #23, who was diagnosed with Bipolar Disorder, Schizophrenia, Anxiety and Depression received the care and services needed in the most appropriate setting, after the resident began to display anxious and depressive behaviors. This failure could place residents at risk for their mental and psychosocial needs not being met. The findings included: Record review of Resident #23's face sheet, dated 03/25/2022, indicated a [AGE] year-old male, who was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: Traumatic Brain Injury (Trauma to the Brain), Other Sexual Dysfunction due to a substance or known physiological condition (Sexual Dysfunction from a cause that is known) and Pseudobulbar Affect (Episodes of inappropriate laughing or crying). Record review of Resident's #23's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/22/2021, revealed in Section A the resident was not PASRR positive with a level 2 for mental illness, Developmental Disability or Intellectual disability. Section B, hearing, Speech, and Vision, Resident #23's was able to make himself understood and he had the ability to understand with clear comprehension. Section C revealed Resident #23 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 08, which indicated he had moderately impaired cognition. Section I revealed active diagnosis for Malnutrition, Depression, Bipolar Disorder, other Sexual Dysfunction, and Schizophrenia. Section N revealed Resident #23 had not received any injections within the past 7 days but had received Antipsychotics, and Antidepressants for the last 7 days. Section Q indicated that Resident #23 participated in the assessment. Record review of Resident #23's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/26/2022, revealed Section B, hearing, Speech, and Vision, Resident #23's was able to make himself understood and he had the ability to understand with clear comprehension. Section C revealed Resident #23 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, which indicated he was cognitively intact. Section G revealed that Resident #23 required extensive assistance and 1-person physical assist with activities of daily living except for locomotion, dressing, personal hygiene, which is supervision or limited assist. Resident #23 required the use of a wheelchair for a mobility device. Section N revealed that Resident #23 had not received any injections within the past 7 days but had received Antipsychotics, and Antidepressants for the last 7 days. Section Q indicated that Resident #23 participated in the assessment. Record review of Resident #23's Care Plan did not reflect a need for psychiatric or psychological services. The care plan reflected: Resident #23's sexual behaviors were initiated on 10/25/2021, which revealed the following: Created date: 09/19/2019; Focus: Poor impulse control and has sexually inappropriate behaviors with staff. Goal: The resident will verbalize understanding of need to control physically aggressive and sexual behaviors through the review date. Administer medication as order and document for side effects and effectiveness. Focus: The resident has verbally been aggressive to staff and other residents related to Dementia, ineffective coping skills, poor impulse control. Goal is for the resident to have fewer than 3 episodes per week of verbal behavior. Focus: The resident is/has potential to be physically aggressive running his wheelchair to staffs and other residents related to Anger, Dementia, Poor impulse control and has sexually inappropriate behaviors towards staff. Goal is the resident will verbalize understanding of need to control physically aggressive and sexual behaviors. Focus: The resident uses psychotropic medications Abilify related to Behavior management; Administer Depakote as ordered. Record review of Resident #23's clinical records did not reflect any behavioral health care visits or progress notes. Record review of Resident #23's orders for 03/25/22 revealed medication orders for the following:- -Abilify 20 MG, Give 1 tablet by mouth in the morning for Major Depressive Disorder, recurrent. -Carbamazepine tablet 200 MG, Give 1 tablet by mouth 2 times a day for Bipolar Disorder. -Depakote Extended Release tablet 24-hour 500 MG, Give 1 tablet by mouth 2 times a day related to Bipolar Disorder. -Dextromethorphan-quinidine capsule 20-10 MG, Give 1 capsule by mouth 2 times a day related to Pseudobulbar Affect. -Trazadone tablet 100 MG, Give 1 tablet by mouth in the evening related to insomnia. Record review of Resident #23's orders showed a psychiatric evaluation for psychiatric services was not entered until 03/24/22. Record review of Resident #23's orders showed a phone order for an evaluation of capacity for psychiatric/neurological services related to Mood Disorder for 60 days, was not entered until 03/24/2022. Record review of Resident #23's Nursing progress notes revealed the following: - On 10/05/2021 at 9:12 AM revealed: At this time CNA made the nurse aware that resident was becoming physically aggressive in the shower. Resident requested lotion so she could watch him masturbate. CNA attempted to make resident aware that we are here to shower and that I am not going to watch you do that. He stated then Fuck you Bitch and proceeded to scream and yell and curse at her. Unable to put a plan in place due to resident not being willing or able to follow a plan. - On 12/21/2021 at 8:56 PM revealed: Saw resident going down C hall attempting to go to another resident's room asking for a dip. When tried to redirect resident became angry cursing and flipping finger to the nurse and another staff member. Also tried to hit the staff with his wheelchair. - On 12/26/2021 at 9:20 AM revealed: The resident saturated in urine refusing pericare from staff assisting the resident to get changed and dry. Continues to yell and curse at staff yelling he wants his dip motherfucking now. The resident finally after several attempts went to his room and changed his clothes refusing assistance. The resident then returned to the nurse's station yelling bitches and [NAME] at staff. Attempted to redirect the resident he stopped yelling and started flipping off the staff. The resident then went in his room and remained in his room until after breakfast. The resident then given his dip at 9 AM however the resident has now spilt half of his dip on the floor stating he wants more, speaking with a mouthful of dip at this time. - On 12/26/2021 at 10:38 AM revealed: The resident called the facility phone laughing stating that he shit on himself and needed someone to come clean him up. The resident then sat on the toilet and pulled the emergency call light. Upon observation the resident had feces all over the wheelchair, he stated he pulled his pants down and had a bowel movement in his wheelchair the resident then had feces spread from the w/c to floor to the toilet seat. The resident then began yelling at staff attempting to assist the resident when he threw his t-shirt that he had wiped the feces in at staff. The resident was heard at nurse's station cursing at staff. - On 01/06/2022 at 3:55 PM revealed: Resident propels self around via wheelchair targeting different nurses requesting chewing tobacco. Becomes upset and begins yelling when nurses tell him it's not time. - On 01/23/2022 at 1:59 PM revealed: The resident has been very noncompliant thus far this shift. -On 03/23/2022 at 4:59 PM revealed: Resident has an incorrect screen code of intellectual illness. Resident has a screen code of Mental illness. - On 03/24/2022 at 11:45 AM revealed: At approximately 8:00 AM Medication Aide A reported to me that Resident was seated in his wheelchair in the doorway of his room with his door open. He has his penis out of his pants and was fondling himself. - On 03/25/2022 at 11:18 AM revealed: Spoke with Staff Member A from the local PASRR authorities in regard to resident and positive PASSAR, appointment scheduled on 03/30/2022 at 8 AM. Resident notified of appointment and time. Interview on 03/23/2022 at 2:40 PM with the MDS coordinator, she was unaware Resident #23's received a citation from last year's annual survey due to his behavior, but she felt like his behaviors had been corrected. She said she had never conducted an IDT meeting to facilitate treatment for the resident's behavioral issues . In an interview on 03/25/2022 at 10:00 AM, the DON said they had not tried any non-pharmacological interventions for Resident #23. She said the Medical Doctor had not done any competency evaluations on the resident, but they were going to get one done. The DON said they had not submitted a previous request for Mental Health Services because they felt that it would not be effective. She said Resident #23 has had ongoing behaviors that have been directed towards others which included sexual, physical, and verbal aggression. She said she put an order in for a Psych evaluation and PASRR has since been contacted and will be out to the facility next week to see the resident and provide services to him .
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0742 (Tag F0742)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record reviews, facility failed to ensure resident who was diagnosed with a mental illness or psychosocia...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record reviews, facility failed to ensure resident who was diagnosed with a mental illness or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who had a history of trauma and / or post-traumatic stress disorder, received appropriate treatment and services to correct the assessed problem or to attain the highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being for (Resident #23 ) 1 of 1 resident reviewed. The facility failed to ensure Resident #23, who was diagnosed with bipolar disorder, Schizophrenia, Depression and Anxiety received the care and services needed in the most appropriate setting, after the resident began to display verbally and physically aggressive behaviors. This failure could place residents at risk for their mental and psychosocial needs not being met. The findings included: Record review of Resident #23's face sheet, dated 03/25/2022, indicated a [AGE] year-old male, who was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: Traumatic Brain Injury (Trauma to the Brain), Other Sexual Dysfunction due to a substance or known physiological condition (Sexual Dysfunction from a cause that is known) and Pseudobulbar Affect (Episodes of inappropriate laughing or crying). Record review of Resident #23's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/26/2022, revealed in Section B, Hearing, Speech, and Vision, Resident #23 was able to make himself understood and he had the ability to understand with clear comprehension. Section C revealed Resident #23 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, which indicated he was cognitively intact. Section G revealed Resident #23 required extensive assistance and 1-person physical assist with activities of daily living except for locomotion, dressing, personal hygiene, which is supervision or limited assist. Resident #23 required the use of a wheelchair for a mobility device. Section N revealed Resident #23 had not received any injections within the past 7 days. Section Q indicated Resident #23 participated in the assessment. Record review of Resident #23's Care Plan did not reflect a need for psychiatric or psychological services. The care plan reflected: Resident #23's sexual behaviors were initiated on 10/25/2021, which revealed the following: Created date: 09/19/2019; Focus: Poor impulse control and has sexually inappropriate behaviors with staff. Goal: The resident will verbalize understanding of need to control physically aggressive and sexual behaviors through the review date. Administer medication as order and document for side effects and effectiveness. Focus: The resident has verbally been aggressive to staff and other residents related to Dementia, ineffective coping skills, poor impulse control. Goal is for the resident to have fewer than 3 episodes per week of verbal behavior. Focus: The resident is/has potential to be physically aggressive running his wheelchair to staffs and other residents related to Anger, Dementia, Poor impulse control and has sexually inappropriate behaviors towards staff. Goal is the resident will verbalize understanding of need to control physically aggressive and sexual behaviors. Focus: The resident uses psychotropic medications Abilify related to Behavior management; Administer Depakote as ordered. Record review of Resident #23's clinical records did not reflect any behavioral health care visits or progress notes. Record review of Resident #23's orders for 03/25/22 revealed medication orders for the following:- -Abilify 20 MG, Give 1 tablet by mouth in the morning for Major Depressive Disorder, recurrent. -Carbamazepine tablet 200 MG, Give 1 tablet by mouth 2 times a day for Bipolar Disorder. -Depakote Extended Release tablet 24-hour 500 MG, Give 1 tablet by mouth 2 times a day related to Bipolar Disorder. -Dextromethorphan-quinidine capsule 20-10 MG, Give 1 capsule by mouth 2 times a day related to Pseudobulbar Affect. -Trazadone tablet 100 MG, Give 1 tablet by mouth in the evening related to insomnia. Record review of Resident #23's orders showed a psychiatric evaluation for psychiatric services was not entered until 03/24/22. Record review of Resident #23's orders showed a phone order for an evaluation of capacity for psychiatric/neurological services related to Mood Disorder for 60 days, was not entered until 03/24/2022. Record review of Resident #23's Nursing progress notes revealed the following: - On 10/05/2021 at 9:12 AM revealed: At this time CNA made the nurse aware that resident was becoming physically aggressive in the shower. Resident requested lotion so she could watch him masturbate. CNA attempted to make resident aware that we are here to shower and that I am not going to watch you do that. He stated then Fuck you Bitch and proceeded to scream and yell and curse at her. Unable to put a plan in place due to resident not being willing or able to follow a plan. - On 12/21/2021 at 8:56 PM revealed: Saw resident going down C hall attempting to go to another resident's room asking for a dip. When tried to redirect resident became angry cursing and flipping finger to the nurse and another staff member. Also tried to hit the staff with his wheelchair. - On 12/26/2021 at 9:20 AM revealed: The resident saturated in urine refusing pericare from staff assisting the resident to get changed and dry. Continues to yell and curse at staff yelling he wants his dip motherfucking now. The resident finally after several attempts went to his room and changed his clothes refusing assistance. The resident then returned to the nurse's station yelling bitches and [NAME] at staff. Attempted to redirect the resident he stopped yelling and started flipping off the staff. The resident then went in his room and remained in his room until after breakfast. The resident then given his dip at 9 AM however the resident has now spilt half of his dip on the floor stating he wants more, speaking with a mouthful of dip at this time. - On 12/26/2021 at 10:38 AM revealed: The resident called the facility phone laughing stating that he shit on himself and needed someone to come clean him up. The resident then sat on the toilet and pulled the emergency call light. Upon observation the resident had feces all over the wheelchair, he stated he pulled his pants down and had a bowel movement in his wheelchair the resident then had feces spread from the w/c to floor to the toilet seat. The resident then began yelling at staff attempting to assist the resident when he threw his t-shirt that he had wiped the feces in at staff. The resident was heard at nurse's station cursing at staff. - On 01/06/2022 at 3:55 PM revealed: Resident propels self around via wheelchair targeting different nurses requesting chewing tobacco. Becomes upset and begins yelling when nurses tell him it's not time. - On 01/23/2022 at 1:59 PM revealed: The resident has been very noncompliant thus far this shift. -On 03/23/2022 at 4:59 PM revealed: Resident has an incorrect screen code of intellectual illness. Resident has a screen code of Mental illness. - On 03/24/2022 at 11:45 AM revealed: At approximately 8:00 AM Medication Aide A reported to me that Resident was seated in his wheelchair in the doorway of his room with his door open. He has his penis out of his pants and was fondling himself. - On 03/25/2022 at 11:18 AM revealed: Spoke with Staff Member A from the local PASRR authorities in regard to resident and positive PASSAR, appointment scheduled on 03/30/2022 at 8 AM. Resident notified of appointment and time. Interview on 03/23/2022 at 2:40 PM with the MDS coordinator she said, the resident should have been receiving PASRR services to address his Intellectual Disability and his Mental Illness, but she was unsure how to initiate services. When asked if she had ever contacted PASRR concerning this resident, she said that she had not. I asked her if she felt the resident's behavior was an issue. She said that it was but that she did not code it on the MDS because the medications were working. She said that she was aware that this same resident received a tag last year due to behavioral or PASRR issues, but she felt like it had been corrected. She said that she had never notified the local authorities or conducted an IDT meeting to facilitate treatment for the resident's behavioral issues. In an interview on 03/25/2022 at 10:00 AM, the DON said that they had not tried any non-pharmacological interventions for Resident #23. I asked her if his Medical Doctor had ever done a competency evaluation on the resident. She said he had not, but they were going to get that done. The DON said that they had not submitted a previous request for Mental Health Services because they felt that it would not be effective. She was unaware that PASRR had not been contacted and that they should have been for the Mental Illness aspect. She said that Resident #23 has had ongoing behaviors that have been directed towards others which include sexual, physical, and verbal aggression. She said she has put an order in for a Psych evaluation and that PASRR has since been contacted and will be out in the facility next week to see the resident and provide services to him. Requested a copy of the facilities policy and procedures that would cover treatments along with mental concerns, one was not provided at the time of exit.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0757 (Tag F0757)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident's drug regimen was free of unnecessary drugs f...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident's drug regimen was free of unnecessary drugs for (Resident #23) 1 of 1 whose medications were reviewed. This failure could place residents at risk of being over-medicated or experience undesirable side effects and cause a physical or psychosocial decline in health. Resident #23 (a male) received a female hormone replacement drug (Depo-Provera) due to inappropriate sexual behaviors without review for continued necessity and documented clinical rationale for the benefit or adequate monitoring from 05/2021 until 03/2022. Findings include: Record review of Resident #23's face sheet, dated 03/25/2022, indicated a [AGE] year-old male, who was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: Traumatic Brain Injury (Trauma to the Brain), Other Sexual Dysfunction due to a substance or known physiological condition (Sexual Dysfunction from a cause that is known) and Pseudobulbar Affect (Episodes of inappropriate laughing or crying). Record review of Resident #23's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/26/2022, revealed in Section B, Hearing, Speech, and Vision, Resident #23 was able to make himself understood and he had the ability to understand with clear comprehension. Section C revealed Resident #23 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, which indicated he was cognitively intact. Section G revealed Resident #23 required extensive assistance and 1-person physical assist with activities of daily living except for locomotion, dressing, personal hygiene, which is supervision or limited assist. Resident #23 required the use of a wheelchair for a mobility device. Section N revealed Resident #23 had not received any injections within the past 7 days. Section Q indicated Resident #23 participated in the assessment. Record review of resident # 23's Physician order report dated 05/11/2021, revealed the following orders: Start Date 05/11/21 End Date Ongoing for Depo-Provera (medroxyprogesterone) suspension; 150mg/mL; amt: 1mL; inject 1 applicator intramuscularly one time a day every 90 days related to other sexual dysfunction, ordered and electronically signed by [Physician A]. No behavior monitoring logs were found in the clinical record . According to the Mayo Clinic, Depo-Provera is a well-known brand name for medroxyprogesterone acetate, a contraceptive injection that contains the hormone progestin. Depo-Provera is given as an injection every three months. Depo-Provera typically suppresses ovulation, keeping your ovaries from releasing an egg. It also thickens cervical mucus to keep sperm from reaching the egg. Accessed on 8/30/21. https://www.mayoclinic.org/tests-procedures/depo-provera/about/pac-20392204 According to the Federal Drug Administration (FDA), Depo-Provera is a progestin indicated only for the prevention of pregnancy .The recommended dose is 150mg of Depo-Provera every 3 months (13 weeks) administered by deep, intramuscular (IM) injection in the gluteal or deltoid muscle Accessed on 8/30/21. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2015/020246s054,021583s026lbl.pdf In an interview on 03/24/2021 at 11:30 AM, with Resident #23 revealed the resident, was alert and oriented. He knew where he was located and was aware of his surroundings. He sat in his bed on his phone. State Surveyor explained the medication usage and side effects to him. He replied he did not want to take something like that. The State Surveyor informed him it was a medication that had already been administered. He said again he would not consent to it. The resident stated he understood what the State Surveyor asked and, he could tell people yes or no if he needed to. In an interview on 03/24/2022 at 11:10 AM, the DON said they had received a verbal consent for Depo Provera from Resident #23's Family Member. She said that was who they received all the consents for Resident #23 from. She said that he did not have a Medical Power of Attorney. She said they did not get consents for any type of treatments, medications, or care planning from Resident #23, they only received consents from Family Member. I asked her if she had even asked the resident or informed him of what he was taking, since his BIMS score was a 12. She said that she did not, and she believed she did not have to even get a consent for this type of medication . In an interview on 03/25/2022 at 10:00 AM, the DON said they had not tried any non-pharmacological interventions for Resident #23 prior to receiving the orders for the Depo-Provera Injection. The DON said her understanding with administering the Depo-Provera shot to male residents was it would lower the testosterone levels which would lower their sex drive. In an interview on 03/25/2021 at 4:24 PM, Physician A said he treated Resident #23 for behaviors, which included sexual behaviors. He said he had given a verbal order in May of 2021 for Depo Provera to help with this . He said the order was only a one-time order and it should have been given along with initiation of psych services. He said he would have never of ordered Depo Provera for long term usage, as it is meant to be for short term usage. He was unsure why it was still given up to this date. He said it inhibits the patient's sexual behaviors. Record review of the facility's policy that was furnished and said that it was their policy, was titled, Medication Regimen Review, documented [in-part]: Each resident's drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drug is any drug when used: In excessive dose, for excessive duration, without adequate monitoring , without adequate indications for its use, in the presence of adverse consequences which indicate the dose should be reduced or discontinues or any combination of the reasons below.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Assessment Accuracy (Tag F0641)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** . Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure resident assessments accurately reflected...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** . Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure resident assessments accurately reflected the resident's status for 3 of 6 residents (Resident #23, Resident #27, and Resident #147) reviewed for accuracy of assessments. The facility failed to ensure: 1. Resident #23's Annual MDS dated [DATE] section A1500 indicated: no, resident has not had a PE (PASSR EValuation Assesment) and determined to have a serious illness. However, his PE (PASSR Evaluation Assessment by the Local Mental Health Authority or Local Intellectual Disability Authority) was documented as completed in the LTC Portal 09/19/2017. 2. Resident #27's Annual MDS dated [DATE] section A1500 indicated: no, resident has not been evaluated by Level 2 PASRR and determined to have a serious illness. However, his PE (PASSR Evaluation) was documented as completed in the LTC Portal (Long Term Care Portal) 01/25/2021. 3.Resident #27's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE], indicated in section G0400 - Functional Limitations in Range of Motion the resident had no impairment in her upper or lower extremities. However, observation revealed the resident had contractures to her right hand, and fingers. 4. Resident #147's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE], indicated in section O: Respiratory Treatments - C Oxygen therapy was coded as not in use. However, the resident has required oxygen at 2 liters per minute since admission to the facility on [DATE]. These deficient practices could place residents at risk of inadequate care and services based on inaccurate assessments and a decline in health and psychosocial well-being. The findings were: 1. Record review of Resident #23's face sheet, dated 03/25/2022, revealed a [AGE] year-old male with an initial admission date of 08/09/2017 and a readmission date of 08/09/2019. The resident had diagnoses which included: Traumatic Brain Injury dated 11/15/2018 (Principal Diagnosis), Other Sexual Dysfunction, Schizoaffective Disorder, Anxiety, Bipolar, Mood Disorder, Major Depressive Disorder and Pseudobulbar. Record Review of Resident #23's Annual MDS, dated [DATE], revealed in Section A1500 the resident had not been evaluated by PAS and determined to have a serious mental illness and/or mental retardation or a related condition. Record review of Resident #23's Medicaid activity form, printed 05/23/2022 and dated 09/19/2017, revealed the resident's PL 1 (initial screening to to identify an individual as having a mental ilness or intellectual disability), dated 08/20/2017, indicated yes for Intellectual Disability. His PE was documented as confirmed 09/19/2017. Record review of Resident #23's Medicaid activity form, printed 05/23/2022 and dated 09/19/2017, revealed the resident's PL 1, dated 08/20/2017, indicated yes for Intellectual Disability. His PE was documented as confirmed 09/19/2017. Observation and interview of Resident #23 on 03/24/2021 revealed the resident was alert and oriented. He sat in his bed on his phone. He said he had not received any additional counselling services or PASARR services. 2. Record review of Resident #27's face sheet, dated 03/25/2022, revealed a [AGE] year-old female with an initial admission date of 06/26/2020 and a readmission date of 08/12/2021. The resident had diagnoses which included: Strain of Other Specified Muscles, Fascia (thin sheet of fibrous covering enclosing a muscle) and Tendons of Wrist and Left hand, dated 12/13/21 (Principal Diagnoses), Muscle Wasting and Atrophy (degeneration), dated 10/22/2021 (Secondary Diagnosis) Chronic Pain Syndrome, dated 06/26/2020, Pain Right Knee, dated 08/26/2020, Pain Left Knee, dated 08/26/2020. Unspecified osteoarthritis, and Schizoaffective Disorder, Bipolar Type, dated 06/26/2020. Record review of Resident #27's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], revealed in Section G0400 the resident had no functional limitation in range of motion to her upper extremity (shoulder, elbow, wrist or hand). Record Review of Resident #27's Annual MDS, dated [DATE], revealed in Section A1500 that the resident had not been evaluated by Level II PASARR and determined to have a serious mental illness and/or mental retardation or a related condition. Record review of Resident #27's Medicaid activity form, printed 03/23/2022 , revealed the resident's PL 1, dated 07/08/2020, indicated yes for Mental Illness. Her PE was documented as confirmed 10/15/2022. Observation and interview of Resident #27 on 03/23/2022 at 09:52 AM revealed the resident had contractures to her right hand and fingers. There was a splint observed on the chest of drawers in her room. She stated it was a splint for her right hand and was told by the therapy department to wear it at night. 3. Record review of Resident #147's face sheet, dated 3/25/2022, revealed an admission date of 2/26/2022. The resident had diagnoses which included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, (chronic disease of the lungs) Malignant Neoplasm (a cancerous tumor that has spread to nearby tissue )of lower lobe, Right Bronchus or Lung, Dependence on Supplemental Oxygen, Anxiety Disorder Major Depressive Disorder, Atrial Fibrillation, osteoporosis without current pathologic findings, Hypertension and Muscle Spasm. Record review of Resident #147's Physician orders, dated 03/30/2022, revealed Oxygen at 2 liters a minute via nasal cannula continuously. May titrate to 3-4 liters per minute to keep O2 saturation >90. Record review of Resident #147's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], indicated in section O: Respiratory Treatments - C - Oxygen therapy was coded as not in use. Observation and interview of Resident #147 on 03/23/2021 at 10:30 a.m. revealed, the resident was alert and oriented. She sat on her bed watching television iwth her oxygen in use at 2 liters per minute via nasal cannula. The Resident stated, she's been on oxygen ever since she was admitted on [DATE]. During an interview with MDS Coordinator on 03/23/2022 at 2:00 p.m., revealed Resident #147 was on oxygen therapy continuously and had been since admission to the facility on [DATE] and the MDS and Care plan were not accurate. She stated she was responsible for ensuring the document accurately reflected the resident. She stated inaccurate documentation in the MDS could result in the resident not receiving adequate treatment and services. In an interview on 03/24/2022 at 10:30 AM, the DON stated she was aware there was a problem with the accuracy of the MDS's and Care plans. She stated the MDS nurse was responsible for the accuracy of those documents and she should have filled them out correctly. She did not state how the residents could be affected by these inaccuracy's.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

PASARR Coordination (Tag F0644)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to refer all level II (PASRR Evaluation assessment, used to confirm an ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to refer all level II (PASRR Evaluation assessment, used to confirm an individual has a mental illness, an intellectual disability or a developmental disability and to develop specialized services needed) residents and all residents with newly evident or possible serious mental disorder, intellectual disability, or a related condition for level II resident review upon a significant change in status assessment for 3 of 5 residents (Resident #22, Resident #37, Resident #247) reviewed for coordination of PASRR and assessments. The facility failed to ensure Residents #22, #37 and #247 had PASRR Level II screenings. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving needed mental health care and services. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident's #22's face sheet, dated 03/25/22, revealed a [AGE] year-old male, admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident had diagnoses which included: attention and concentration deficit following cerebral infarction, dated 07/14/2020 (primary diagnosis); Major Depressive Disorder (clinical depression), dated 07/14/2020; Schizoaffective Disorder (A mental disorder in which a person experiences a combination of symptoms of schizophrenia and mood disorder), dated 07/13/2020; unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance, dated 10/02/2020; muscle wasting and atrophy, dated 09/11/2020; abnormalities of gait and mobility, dated 09/11/2020; dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), oropharyngeal phase, dated 12/04/2021; ataxia (impaired coordination), dated 09/11/2020; seizures, dated 07/27/2021; and cognitive communication deficit, dated 11/17/2020. Record review of the Annual MDS assessment, dated 04/19/2021, revealed Resident #22, under (Section A1500), had no mental illness, mental retardation, or a related condition; Section I - Active Diagnoses was marked positive for: I4500 cerebrovascular accident, I4800 dementia, I5400 Seizure Disorder or Epilepsy; I5800 Depression (other than bipolar) and I6000 Schizophrenia. Record review of PASRR Level I screening (PASRR Level 1 screening to identify if an individual has an indication of mental illness, an intellectual disability or a developmental disability ), dated 08/18/2020, revealed Resident #22 was negative for mental illness, intellectual disability, and developmental disability conditions. There was no record that a PASRR Level II Screening was conducted. Record review of Resident #22's Physician's Order Report, dated 03/25/2022, revealed orders for: sertraline 100 mg tablet daily related to Major Depressive Disorder, Recurrent, with a start date of 12/11/2020. Record review of Resident #22's Care Plan, last revised 01/28/2022, revealed the following care plans for: A) The resident has a communication problem related to neurological symptoms. The resident had a stroke as a baby. B) The resident has impaired cognitive function/dementia or impaired thought processes related to CVA. C) The resident uses antidepressant medication, Sertraline, related to Major Depressive Disorder. In an interview on 03/23/2022 at 10:50 AM, the MDS Coordinator said she was responsible for the PASRR's. She agreed there was an error on the PL1, dated 08/18/2020, and stated Resident #22 should have been marked yes for Mental Illness and marked yes for Intellectual Disability Disorder, due to the resident having a cerebral accident when he was an infant. She said she was responsible for completing the PL1's and checking for changes and updated them. The MDS Coordinator did not know what a 1012 form was used for and said she had never received any formal training. She said she would update Resident #22's PL1 to reflect positive mental health and Intellectual Disability Disorder. 2. Record review of Resident #37's face sheet, dated 03/25/22, revealed Resident #37 a [AGE] year-old female with an initial admission date of 03/30/21 and a readmission date of 04/01/21. Her diagnoses included Schizoaffective Disorder (A mental disorder in which a person experiences a combination of symptoms of schizophrenia and mood disorder), unspecified dated 03/30/21, Major Depressive Disorder (clinical depression), Single episode, dated 03/30/21. Record review of the Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 02/17/2022, revealed, Section I - Active Diagnoses, was marked positive for I6000 Schizophrenia, and I5800 Depression (other than bipolar). Section N Record review of Resident # 37's Medicaid Activity Form Activity report in the long-term care portal revealed a PASARR Level I screening, dated 09/28/2021. Resident #37 was positive for mental illness, and negative for intellectual disability, and developmental disability conditions. There was no record that a PASRR Level II Screening was conducted. Record review of Resident #37's Physician's Order Report, dated 03/25/2022, revealed orders for: Zyprexa 15 mg tablet daily related to Schizophrenia, medication start date 08/19/2012. Record review of Resident #37's Care Plan, last revised 03/04/22, revealed the following care plan areas: A) The resident has a behavior problem related to Schizoaffective Disorder. B) The resident has impaired cognitive function/dementia or impaired thought processes related to iron deficiency with blood transfusion and impaired decision-making ability. C) The resident uses antipsychotic medication, Zyprexa, related to Schizoaffective Disorder. In an interview on 03/23/2022 at 10:50 AM, the MDS Coordinator said she was responsible for the PASRR's. She agreed the PL1, dated 09/18/2021, was marked yes for Mental Illness. She said she was responsible for completing the PL1's and checking for changes and updated them. The MDS Coordinator stated Resident #37 had not had a PASRR evaluation. She said this error occurred because she did not understand it was her responsibility to contact the local authority to ensure the PE was completed. She stated she had no formal Training in PASRR. This failure could affect the residents as they would not get the services they need or quality for. 3. Record review of Resident #247's face sheet, dated 03/05/22, revealed a [AGE] year-old female, who was admitted to the facility initially on 01/07/2022, and had a re-admission date of 02/11/22. The resident had diagnoses which included: Other Depressive Episodes, Other Seizures, and Attention and Concentration Deficit Following Nontraumatic Subarachnoid Hemorrhage (Bleeding within the subarachnoid space, which is the area between the brain and the tissue covering the brain). Record review of Resident # 247's admission MDS, dated [DATE], revealed Section I5800 was marked positive for Depression (other than Bipolar). Section N0410 documented the resident took an antidepressant for the last 7 days and she had not taken an antipsychotic. Record review of Resident # 247's Medicaid Activity Forms in the long-term care portal revealed a PASRR Level I screening, dated 01/11/2022. Resident #247 was positive for mental illness, and negative for intellectual disability, and developmental disability conditions. There was no record that a PASARR Level II Screening was conducted. Record review of Resident #247's Care Plan, last revised 02/15/22, revealed the following care plan areas: A) The resident has little, or no activity related to Major Depressive Disorder. B) The resident has impaired cognitive function/dementia or impaired thought processes related to BIMS of 08 (moderate impairment), Cognition fluctuates daily C) The resident uses an Antidepressant, related to Depression. In an interview on 03/23/2022 at 10:50 AM, the MDS Coordinator said she was responsible for the PASRR's. She agreed the PL1, dated 01/11/2022, was marked yes for Mental Illness. She said she was responsible for completing the PL1's and checking for changes and updated them. The MDS Coordinator stated Resident #247 had not had a PASRR evaluation (PE). In an interview on 03/24/2022 at 10:30 AM, the DON stated she was aware there was a problem with the PASRR's and the MDS's. She stated the MDS Coordinator was responsible for the accuracy of those documents and she should have filled them out correctly. Record review of the facility's policy and procedure titled PASRR Policy and Procedure stated in part: . uses the most current version of PASRR Rules, TAC Title 40 Part 1Chapter 19, Sub -chapter BB as they pertain to PASRR Level 1, Level 2 (PE Specialized services and IDT meetings.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0645 (Tag F0645)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident in the nursing facility was screened for a ment...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident in the nursing facility was screened for a mental disorder or intellectual disability prior to admission and individuals identified with mental disorder or intellectual disability were evaluated and received care and services appropriate to their needs for 4 of 4 residents (Resident #20, Resident #42, Resident #37, and Resident #247) reviewed for PASRR. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #20's PASRR Level 1, dated 10/22/2021, was positive for Mental Illness. She did not receive a PASRR Level II screening prior to admission to the facility. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #42, who had a diagnosis of major depressive disorder, at the time of admission, PASRR Level I was completed. 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #37 PASRR Level I, dated 09/28/2021, was positive for Mental Illness. She did not receive a PASRR Level II Screening prior to the admission to the facility. 4. The facility failed to ensure Resident 247's PASRR Level I, dated 01/11/2022, was positive for Mental Illness. She did not receive a PASRR Level II screening prior to the admission to the facility. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #20's face sheet, dated 03/25/2022, revealed a [AGE] year-old female with an initial admission date of 10/22/2021. Resident # 20 had diagnoses which included Schizophrenia (A mental disorder characterized by delusions, hallucinations, disorganized thoughts, speech and behavior), unspecified dated 10/22/2021, Other Depressive Disorders (clinical depression), dated 10/22/2021. Record review of the Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 02/17/2021, revealed in Section I - Active Diagnoses, was marked positive for I6000 Schizophrenia, and I5800 Depression (other than bipolar). Section N was marked 7 days for Antipsychotics and Antidepressant Medications received. Record review of Resident # 20's Medicaid Activity Form Activity report in the long-term care portal revealed a PASRR Level I screening, dated 10/22/2021. Resident #20 was positive for mental illness, and negative for intellectual disability, and developmental disability conditions. There was no record a PASRR Level II Screening was conducted. The form instructed the facility to contact the local PASRR authorities. Record review of Resident #20's Physician's Order Report, dated 03/25/2022, revealed orders for: Ziprasidone HCI capsule 40 mg daily related to Schizophrenia, medication start date 10/22/202 and Fluoxetine HCI capsule 40 mg daily related to Other Specified Depressive Episodes. Record review of Resident #20's Care Plan, last revised 01/21/2022, revealed the following care plan areas: A) The resident has a behavior problem related to Schizoaffective Disorder and Major Depressive Disorder. B) The resident will be free from discomfort or adverse reactions related to antidepressant therapy through the review date. B) The resident uses antipsychotic medication, Geodon, related to Schizoaffective Disorder. The resident will remain free of psychotropic drug related complications, including movement disorder, discomfort, hypotension, gait disturbance, constipation/impaction or cognitive/behavior impairment through the review date. In an interview on 10/22/2021 at 10:50 AM, the MDS Coordinator said she was responsible for the PASRR's. She stated the PL1, dated 09/18/2021, was marked yes for Mental Illness. She said she was responsible for completing the PL1's and checking for changes and updated them. The MDS Coordinator stated Resident #20 had not had a PASRR evaluation. She said this error occurred because she did not understand it was her responsibility to contact the local authority to ensure the PE was completed. She stated she had no formal Training in PASRR. 2. Record review of Resident #37's face sheet, dated 03/25/2022, revealed a [AGE] year-old female with an initial admission date of 03/30/2021 and a readmission date of 04/01/21. Resident # 37 had diagnoses which included Schizoaffective Disorder (a mental disorder in which a person experiences a combination of symptoms of schizophrenia and mood disorder), unspecified dated 03/30/2021, Major Depressive Disorder (clinical depression), Single episode, dated 03/30/2021. Record review of the Quarterly MDS assessment, dated 02/17/2022, revealed in Section I - Active Diagnoses, was marked positive for I6000 Schizophrenia, and I5800 Depression (other than bipolar). Section N. Record review of Resident # 37's Medicaid Activity Form Activity report in the long-term care portal revealed a PASARR Level I screening, dated 09/28/2021. Resident #37 was positive for mental illness, and negative for intellectual disability, and developmental disability conditions. There was no record a PASRR Level II Screening was conducted. Record review of Resident #37's Physician's Order Report, dated 03/25/2022, revealed orders for: Zyprexa 15 mg tablet daily related to Schizophrenia, medication start date 08/19/2022. Record review of Resident #37's Care Plan, last revised 03/04/2022, revealed the following care plan areas: A) The resident had a behavior problem related to Schizoaffective Disorder. B) The resident has impaired cognitive function/dementia or impaired thought processes related to iron deficiency with blood transfusion and Impaired decision-making ability. C) The resident uses antipsychotic medication, Zyprexa, related to Schizoaffective Disorder. In an interview on 03/23/2022 at 10:50 AM, the MDS Coordinator said she was responsible for the PASRR's. She stated the PL1, dated 09/18/2021, was marked yes for Mental Illness. She said she was responsible for completing the PL1's and checking for changes and updated them. The MDS Coordinator stated Resident #37 had not had a PASRR evaluation. She said this error occurred because she did not understand it was her responsibility to contact the local authority to ensure the PE was completed. She stated she had no formal Training in PASRR. 3. Record review of Resident #42's admission Record, printed 3/24/2022, revealed a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #42's admission diagnoses included major depressive disorder (clinical depression), recurrent and unspecified psychosis (a severe mental disorder in which thought and emotions are so impaired that contact is lost with external reality). Record review of Resident #42's admission MDS assessment, dated 02/22/2022, revealed no PASRR conditions of MI, ID, or DD had been selected. Review of the diagnosis section for Psychiatric/Mood Disorder revealed depression (other than bipolar) was selected. Record review of Resident #42's electronic health record revealed no documented evidence a PASRR Level 1 Screening (PL1) had been completed. During an interview and observation on 03/24/22 at 3:05 PM, as the MDS Coordinator was observed reviewing the resident record, the MDS Coordinator stated she was responsible for PASRR screenings and follow-up with the LIDDA/LMHA regarding PASRR positive residents and specialized services. She reviewed Resident #42's diagnoses list and stated the resident's admission diagnoses on 02/15/2022 included major depressive disorder, recurrent and unspecified psychosis. She proceeded to review Resident #42's admission MDS assessment, dated 02/22/2022, and stated no PASRR conditions of MI, ID, or DD had been selected on the assessment. The MDS Coordinator said the records for Resident #42 in the online PASRR portal and stated she had completed the PL1 for Resident #42 on 03/23/2022, and had selected the indication of MI. She stated there was not a prior PL1 completed for Resident #42 at the time of her admission to the facility. 4. Record review of Resident #247's face sheet, dated 03/05/2022, revealed a [AGE] year-old female, who was admitted to the facility initially on 01/07/2022, and had a re-admission date of 02/11/2022. The resident had diagnoses which included: Other Depressive Episodes (a period of depression that persists for at least two weeks), Other Seizures (sudden, uncontrolled electrical disturbance in the brain which can cause changes in behavior, movements, feelings, and consciousness), and Attention and Concentration Deficit Following Nontraumatic Subarachnoid Hemorrhage (bleeding within the subarachnoid space, which is the area between the brain and the tissue covering the brain.) Record Review of Resident # 247's admission MDS, dated [DATE], revealed Section I5800 was marked positive for Depression (other than Bipolar). Section N0410 documented the resident took an antidepressant for the last 7 days and she had not taken an antipsychotic. Record review of Resident # 247's Medicaid Activity Forms in the long-term care portal revealed a PASRR Level I screening, dated 01/11/2022. Resident #247 was positive for mental illness, and negative for intellectual disability, and developmental disability conditions. There was no record a PASRR Level II Screening was conducted. Record review of Resident #247's Care Plan, last revised 02/15/2022, revealed the following care plan areas: A) The resident has little, or no activity related to Major Depressive Disorder. B) The resident has impaired cognitive function/dementia or impaired thought processes related to BIMS of 08 (moderately impaired), Cognition fluctuates daily C) The resident uses an Antidepressant, related to Depression. In an interview on 03/23/2022 at 10:50 AM, the MDS Coordinator said she was responsible for the PASRR's. She stated the PL1, dated 01/11/2022, was marked yes for Mental Illness. She said she was responsible for completing the PL1's and checking for changes and updated them. The MDS Coordinator stated Resident #247 had not had a PASRR evaluation (PE). In an interview on 03/24/2022 at 10:30 AM, the DON stated she was not aware there was a problem with the PASRR's and the MDS' being completed correctly. She stated the MDS Coordinator was responsible for the accuracy of those documents and she should have filled them out correctly. Record review of the facility's policy and procedure titled PASRR Policy and Procedure stated in part: . uses the most current version of PASRR Rules, TAC Title 40 Part 1Chapter 19, Sub -chapter BB as they pertain to PASRR Level 1, Level 2 (PE Specialized services and IDT meetings.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, which included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment and described the services that were to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 2 of 12 residents (Resident #27 and Resident #147) reviewed for comprehensive care plans. 1. The facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for Resident #27 to include the Limited Range of Motion (contractures) to her right hand and fingers. 2. The facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for Resident #147 after the resident was admitted with an order for oxygen. These failures could place residents at risk for not having their individual needs met. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #27's face sheet, dated 03/25/2022, revealed a [AGE] year-old female with an initial admission date of 06/26/2020 and a readmission date of 08/12/2021. Her diagnoses included: Strain of Other Specified Muscles, Fascia (tissue surrounding a muscle)and Tendons of Wrist and Left hand, dated 12/13/21 (Principal Diagnoses), Muscle Wasting and Atrophy (degeneration of cells), dated 10/22/2021 (Secondary Diagnosis) Chronic Pain Syndrome, dated 06/26/2020, Pain Right Knee, dated 08/26/2020, Pain Left Knee, dated 08/26/2020. Unspecified osteoarthritis, and Schizoaffective Disorder, Bipolar Type, dated 06/26/2020. Record review of Resident #27's comprehensive care plan revealed a revision was documented by the MDS coordinator on 02/02/2022. The resident's Comprehensive Care Plan was not revised to include the contractures to Resident # 27's right hand and fingers During an interview on 03/23/2022 at 2:00 PM, the MDS Coordinator stated the care plan had not been updated since the facility did not have an interdisciplinary care plan meeting in February 2022 when the quarterly MDS was completed. She stated she did not know how the care plan meeting was missed. She stated the care plan meetings were scheduled when the MDS was completed on each resident. She stated she provided the list to the Social Worker. She stated the resident's contractures would have been addressed if the care plan meeting had been held. She stated the MDS nurse was responsible for documenting this information in the care plan. She stated the care plan meeting not being held could result in the resident not receiving the care and treatment she should be receiving. In an interview on 03/24/2022 at 10:30 AM, the Social Worker stated the people who usually attended the Care Plan meeting were the MDS Coordinator, the Social Worker, Activity Director and Dietary Manager. She stated occasionally an ADON, or therapy would attend. She did not provide any further documentation of other care plan meetings but stated Resident #27 would have her next care plan meeting in May 2022 with her next comprehensive assessment. Interview with the Occupational Therapy Assistant on 03/24/2022 at 9:45 AM with the COTA revealed Resident #27 was discharged from therapy on 02/18/2022 after her therapy goals had been met. The COTA stated Resident #27 should be wearing her splint at night. She stated there was not an order written by therapy to communicate the physician's orders to Nursing at the time she acquired the splint. She stated there was a communication breakdown between nursing and therapy due to the order not being written and stated it was therapy's responsibility to write the order for the orthotic device to be applied to her right hand and arm each night. She did not know who was responsible for updating the resident's care plan. 2. Record review of Resident #147's face sheet, dated 03/25/2022, revealed an admission date of 02/26/2022. The resident had diagnoses which included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (a chronic disease of the lungs), Malignant Neoplasm (tumor that has spread to nearby tissue ) of lower lobe, Right Bronchus or Lung, Dependence on Supplemental Oxygen, Anxiety Disorder Major Depressive Disorder, Atrial Fibrillation, osteoporosis without current pathologic findings, Hypertension, Muscle Spasm. Record review of Resident #147's Physician orders, dated 03/30/2022, revealed Oxygen at 2 liters a minute via nasal cannula continuously. May titrate to 3-4 liters per minute to keep O2 stats >90. Record review of Resident #147's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], indicated in section O: Respiratory Treatments - C - Oxygen therapy was coded as not in use. Record review of Resident 147's care plan revealed no documentation of the resident receiving oxygen therapy. Observation and interview of Resident #147 on 03/23/2021 at 10:30 a.m. revealed, the resident was alert and oriented. She sat on her bed watching television With her oxygen in use at 2 liters per minute via nasal cannula. The resident revealed, she's been on oxygen ever since she was admitted on [DATE]. During an interview with the MDS Coordinator on 03/23/2022 at 2:00 p.m. revealed the resident was on oxygen therapy continuously and had been since admission to the facility on [DATE] and the MDS and care plan were not accurate. In an interview on 03/24/2022 at 10:30 AM the DON stated she was aware there was a problem with the care plans not be accurate She stated the MDS Coordinator was responsible for the accuracy of those documents and she should have filled them out correctly. Record review of the facility Care Plan/ Care Area Assessments policy revealed in part: The Interdisciplinary Care Plan in conjunction with the resident or his representative develop and implement a comprehensive care plan for each resident. The care plan interventions are derived from a thorough analysis of the information gathered as part of the comprehensive assessment. The IDT includes the attending physician, a registered nurse, a nurse's aide who has responsibility for the resident, a member of the food and nutrition service department, the resident or legal representative, and other appropriate staff or professionals determined by the resident's needs.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0657 (Tag F0657)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure comprehensive care plans were reviewed and revised by the int...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure comprehensive care plans were reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment which included both the comprehensive and quarterly review assessments for 1 of 12 residents (Resident # 27) reviewed for care plan timing and revision. The facility failed to ensure Resident #27 had a care plan meeting when it was due after her quarterly MDS Assessment on 02/02/2022. This failure could place residents at risk of not being able to attain or maintain their highest practicable level of physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. The findings include: Record review of Resident #27's face sheet, dated 03/25/2022, revealed a [AGE] year-old female with an initial admission date of 06/26/2020 and a readmission date of 08/12/2021. Resident #27 had diagnoses which included: Strain of Other Specified Muscles, Fascia (tissue surrounding a muscle) and Tendons of Wrist and Left hand, dated 12/13/21 (Principal Diagnoses), Muscle Wasting and Atrophy (degeneration), dated 10/22/2021 (Secondary Diagnosis) Chronic Pain Syndrome, dated 06/26/2020, Pain Right Knee, dated 08/26/2020, Pain Left Knee, dated 08/26/2020. Unspecified osteoarthritis, and Schizoaffective Disorder, Bipolar Type, dated 06/26/2020. Record review of Resident #27's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 02/24/2022, revealed a BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score of 12, which indicated mild cognitive impairment. Record review of a document titled Care Plan Conference Summary, dated 11/23/2021, provided by the Social Worker, documented in the Summary of care conference attendance discussion signed by the Social Worker, DS Coordinator, and one other attendee whose signature was not legible. The was no care plan documented in February of 2022. Interview with Resident #27 on 03/23/2022 at 09:52 AM revealed did not remember being invited to a care plan meeting. In an interview on 03/23/2022 at 11:00 AM, the ADON stated she did not attend care plan meetings routinely. She stated she was not sure when the care plan meetings were held unless she was invited. In an interview on 03/24/2022 at 10:30 AM, the Social Worker stated the people who usually attended the care plan meeting were the MDS Coordinator, the Social Worker, Activity Director and Dietary Manager. She stated occasionally an ADON would attend. She did not provide any further documentation of other care plan meetings but stated Resident #27 would have her next care plan meeting in May with her next quarterly assessment. She stated resident # 27's last care plan was held in November of 20222. She stated she did not know how the meeting was missed. She stated the MDS Nurse was responsible for notifying the social worker when the care plan meetings were due at the time of the comprehensive, quarterly , or significant change MDS. Record review of the facilities policy titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person Centered revealed in part: The Interdisciplinary Team must update and review the care plan at least quarterly in conjunction with the required quarterly MDS.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Menu Adequacy (Tag F0803)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the menus were followed. The entire planned main menu for the lunch meal on 03/22/22 was substituted, due to not having...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the menus were followed. The entire planned main menu for the lunch meal on 03/22/22 was substituted, due to not having the main menu entrée of enchiladas. The planned main menu and alternate menu had lunch meal food items substituted, due to not having cauliflower. This failure could place residents at risk of compromised nutrtitional status related to not receiving planned meals approved by the Registered Dietician. The findings include: Record review of the planned Weekly Menu for Fall/Winter 2021-2022 - Week 1 revealed the following: - Tuesday, 03/22/22 Lunch menu consisted of enchilada casserole, Spanish rice, shredded lettuce and diced tomato, banana pudding, tableside condiments, water, and choice of beverage. The alternate menu consisted of roast turkey, yam patties, and smothered squash. Record review of the Substitution Record form revealed changes in the following menu food items: - 03/22/22 Tuesday Week 1 Lunch - Added ham, sweet potato, and broccoli for omitted items of enchiladas and Spanish rice - reason for change: no enchiladas. - 03/22/22 Tuesday Week 1 Lunch - Alternate added beef patty and broccoli for omitted items of roast turkey - reason for change: no turkey. Record review of the planned Weekly Menu for Thursday, 03/24/22, Lunch menu for mechanical soft diets revealed in consisted of 1 each ground crispy onion chicken, 1/2 cup cream style corn, 1/2 cup cauliflower with cheese sauce, dinner roll, 1/2 cup ambrosia (dessert), 8 oz water, and 8 oz beverage of choice. The alternate lunch menu consisted of meatballs with gravy, parslied noodles, and broccoli florets. Record review of the Substitution Record form revealed changes in the following menu food items: 03/24/22 Thursday Week 1 Lunch - added broccoli for omitted item of cauliflower - reason for change: no cauliflower. The Thursday lunch menu did not document the substitution of mashed potatoes as added for the omitted item of cream style corn or parslied noodles for the mechanical soft diet menu. Observation on 03/24/22 at 12:09 PM revealed [NAME] B measured the food holding temperatures on the steam table. The steam table held a pan with mashed potatoes. There was not a pan with prepared parslied noodles. During an interview and observation on 03/22/22 at 9:20 AM, [NAME] B sliced ham on the food preparation counter. She stated she had to substitute the entire lunch menu for today due to not having the enchiladas and not having banana pudding. She stated the residents would be served ham, sweet potatoes, broccoli, a dinner roll, and pistachio pudding. She stated a substitution log was used and was on a clip board hanging on the wall. [NAME] B stated grocery orders were delivered one time weekly on Tuesday afternoons around 2:00 PM and there would be a delivery today. She stated they had not received food items as ordered due to items being on back order. In an interview on 03/24/22 at 10:50 AM, [NAME] B stated she substituted broccoli with cheese sauce for the cauliflower with cheese sauce for the lunch meal today, due to not having any cauliflower. She stated she did not have cream style corn for the mechanical soft diets and would substitute noodles for the cream style corn. [NAME] B stated on Tuesday, 03/22/22, she did not have a planned menu for the substituted lunch meal and went by other menu plans serving sizes. She stated she served 3 oz sliced ham, 4 oz (1/2 cup) broccoli, 4 oz (1/2 cup) yams, 4 oz (1/2 cup) pudding, and a dinner roll. In an interview on 3/25/22 at 9:05 AM, [NAME] B and Dietary Aide C stated there was a Corporate Dietician who did not come to the facility, and a Registered Dietician Consultant who did come to the facility monthly. They stated the facility used menus that were approved by the Corporate office and were sent to the facility via email, and the dietary staff printed the menus from the computer. In an interview on 03/25/22 at 9:10 AM, [NAME] B stated food was ordered according to the menu, but some things had been on back-order and not delivered. In an interview on 03/25/22 at 9:50 AM, the facility's Regional Director of Operations stated he would get the dietary policies/procedures for food substitutions. He stated food was not being delivered as ordered and substitutions had to be made. In an interview on 03/25/22 at 3:30 PM, the Dietary Manager stated cauliflower could have been served for the lunch meal the prior day (03/24/22). He stated cauliflower was available in the freezer and the cooks did not look. He also stated there had been enchiladas in the freezer and they should have been served for the lunch meal according to the menu on Tuesday (03/22/22). The Dietary Manager stated the cauliflower and enchiladas were not delivered this past Tuesday afternoon (03/22/22), they were already in the freezer. Record review of the Dietary Services Policy/Procedures for Substitutions, dated 2001 and Revised April 2007, revealed the following [in part]: Policy Statement Food substitutions will be made as appropriate and necessary. Policy Interpretation and Implementation 1. The food services manager, in conjunction with the clinical dietician, may make food substitutions as appropriate or necessary. The food services shift supervisor on duty will make substitutions only when unavoidable . 3. Residents' likes and dislikes will be considered when making substitutions. 4. All substitutions are noted on the menu and filed in accordance with established dietary policies. Notations of substitutions must include the reason for the substitution. 5. The food services manager will review the substitutions regularly to avoid recurrences when possible.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in one of one kit...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in one of one kitchen reviewed. 1. The facility failed to ensure the hand washing sink surface was clean in the dish room. 2. The facility failed to ensure there was a waste basket for disposing used paper towels by the hand washing sink in the food preparation area. 3. The facility failed to ensure appliance and equipment surfaces were not soiled with grease build-up, food crumbs and dust. 4. The facility failed to ensure open food item packages were properly sealed in bags or storage containers. 5. The facility failed to ensure foods were labeled and dated with the date opened and the date to be discarded if not used. 6. The facility failed to ensure unopened bottles of whipping cream and containers with cottage cheese were not past the manufacturer's dates and did not remain in the walk-in refrigerator. These failure could place residents at risk for foodborne illness and a decline in health status. The findings include: Observations on 03/22/22 at 9:18 AM, during the initial tour of the kitchen, revealed the following: - the hand washing sink in the dish room had a Styrofoam cup containing coffee resting on the sink to the right of the cold water faucet; - the dish room hand washing sink surface was soiled with dirty/dark colored stains. - the hand washing sink in the food preparation area did not have a waste basket located near it for disposing used paper towels; a large, uncovered trash can was located across the room for disposing paper towels after washing hands; - 1 of 2 coffee makers was not working and the container filled with brewed tea was not covered and was open to the air on the counter in the beverage station area; - the ice machine interior door surface was soiled with dried beverage residue and the top exterior surface was soiled with dust; - the steam table pan lids were soiled with grease build-up and dried food; - 3 plastic bulk storage containers were stored on a shelf beneath the food preparation counter and were used for thickener, flour, and granulated sugar. The container lids were soiled with food and grease; - the electric mixer stand was soiled with dried splattered batter; - the manual can opener blade was soiled with a dark colored build-up; - the exterior surfaces of the fryer unit were soiled/greasy and the interior surface had remnants of fried food crumbs and dark colored cooking oil; - stainless steel shelf surfaces were soiled with food crumbs, spilled spices, and dust; - exterior surfaces of the stainless-steel refrigerator doors were soiled with dried food and liquids. Observation on 03/22/22 at 9:32 AM of the non-perishable food storage room revealed the following: - 5 pound packages with white cake mix, dated 01/11/22, lemon cake mix, dated 01/04/22, blue berry muffin mix, the date was not legible, and brownie mix, dated 03/08/22, were opened and rolled to close and wrapped with plastic wrap; - packages with vanilla wafers and flake coconut were opened and wrapped with plastic wrap; they were not labeled and dated; - 2 packages of miniature marshmallows had been opened; 1 bag was knotted/tied to close and 1 was wrapped with plastic wrap; they were not labeled and dated. -The dry food items were stored on wire rack shelf units. The open packages had not been placed in resealable (Ziploc) bags or storage containers with lids. Observation on 03/22/22 at 9:43 AM revealed the walk-in refrigerator had wire rack shelves, which held the following: - an open package with Parmesan cheese was not resealed, labeled or dated; - an open package with shredded mild cheddar cheese was wrapped in plastic wrap and dated 03/18/22; - three 1-quart plastic bottles with whipping cream were unopened with a manufacturer's expiration date of 03/01/22; - two 5 pound containers with cottage cheese - one was opened and almost empty (light weight), and one was unopened; both container had a manufacturer's expiration date of 03/11/22. - the walk-in freezer contained an open package with blueberries, which were not resealed or dated; the bag was open to the air. During an observation and interview on 03/22/22 at 9:45 AM, the Dietary Manager began removing outdated food items from the shelves in the walk-in refrigerator. He stated, We don't use the whipping cream anyway. In an interview on 03/25/22 at 9:10 AM, [NAME] B stated there was a daily cleaning list on a clipboard which hung on the wall and they used it yesterday. She stated she did not know where the clip board with this week's cleaning list was located or why it was not hanging on the wall. She stated there were cleaning lists for the cooks and the dietary aides. Record review of the facility's Dietary Services Policy/Procedures for Food Receiving and Storage, dated 2001 and Revised October 2017 [in part]: Policy Statement Foods shall be received and stored in a manner that complies with safe food handling practices. 1. Food services, or other designated staff, will maintain clean food storage areas at all times . 8. All foods stored in the refrigerator or freezer will be covered, labeled and dated (use by date). Record review of the facility's Policy/Procedure for Kitchen and Equipment Cleaning and Sanitation - Dining Services, dated 12/2020, revealed the following [in part]: Policy: The kitchen and dining service equipment and food contact surfaces shall be maintained in a clean and sanitized condition. Procedure: Dining Services staff shall be trained on cleaning and sanitizing processes. The Dietary Manager shall provide cleaning assignments to indicate the time and task to be completed by dining services staff. The Dietary Manager is responsible to ensure that cleaning assignments have been timely completed Equipment food contact surfaces and utensils shall be clean to sight and touch. Food contact surfaces of cooking equipment and pans shall be kept free of encrusted grease deposits and other accumulations. Nonfood contact surfaces of equipment shall be kept free of an accumulation of dust, dirt, food residue, and other debris . Frequency of Cleaning: Equipment food contact surfaces and utensils used with potentially hazardous food shall be cleaned throughout the day at least every four hours. Nonfood contact surfaces of equipment shall be cleaned at a frequency necessary to prevent accumulation of soil residues . The U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 2017 Food Code specified: Food storage/labelling 3-501.17 Ready-to-Eat, Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food, Date Marking. (A) FOOD prepared and held in a FOOD ESTABLISHMENT for more than 24 hours shall be clearly marked to indicate the date or day by which the FOOD shall be consumed on the PREMISES, sold, or discarded when held at a temperature of 5ºC (41ºF) or less for a maximum of 7 days. 4-601.11 Equipment, Food-Contact Surfaces, Nonfood-Contact Surfaces, and Utensils. (C) Nonfood-contact surfaces of equipment shall be kept free of an accumulation of dust, dirt, food residue, and other debris.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
  • "What safeguards are in place to prevent abuse and neglect?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • 45% turnover. Below Texas's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: Federal abuse finding, 3 life-threatening violation(s), $45,975 in fines. Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 32 deficiencies on record, including 3 critical (life-threatening) violations. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
  • • $45,975 in fines. Higher than 94% of Texas facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
  • • Grade F (0/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: This facility has a substantiated abuse finding. Extreme caution advised. Explore alternatives.

About This Facility

What is Midwestern Healthcare Center's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns Midwestern Healthcare Center an overall rating of 1 out of 5 stars, which is considered much below average nationally. Within Texas, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.

How is Midwestern Healthcare Center Staffed?

CMS rates Midwestern Healthcare Center's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 45%, compared to the Texas average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.

What Have Inspectors Found at Midwestern Healthcare Center?

State health inspectors documented 32 deficiencies at Midwestern Healthcare Center during 2022 to 2025. These included: 3 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death), 28 with potential for harm, and 1 minor or isolated issues. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.

Who Owns and Operates Midwestern Healthcare Center?

Midwestern Healthcare Center is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by NEXION HEALTH, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 121 certified beds and approximately 77 residents (about 64% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in Wichita Falls, Texas.

How Does Midwestern Healthcare Center Compare to Other Texas Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Texas, Midwestern Healthcare Center's overall rating (1 stars) is below the state average of 2.8, staff turnover (45%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (1 stars) is much below the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Midwestern Healthcare Center?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "What safeguards and monitoring systems are in place to protect residents from abuse or neglect?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations and the substantiated abuse finding on record.

Is Midwestern Healthcare Center Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, Midwestern Healthcare Center has documented safety concerns. The facility has 1 substantiated abuse finding (meaning confirmed case of resident harm by staff or other residents). Inspectors have issued 3 Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 1-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Texas. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.

Do Nurses at Midwestern Healthcare Center Stick Around?

Midwestern Healthcare Center has a staff turnover rate of 45%, which is about average for Texas nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.

Was Midwestern Healthcare Center Ever Fined?

Midwestern Healthcare Center has been fined $45,975 across 1 penalty action. The Texas average is $33,539. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.

Is Midwestern Healthcare Center on Any Federal Watch List?

Midwestern Healthcare Center is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.