SERIOUS
(G)
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Pressure Ulcer Prevention
(Tag F0686)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 20 sampled residents, that based on the comprehens...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 20 sampled residents, that based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident the facility did not provide care, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent pressure ulcers. In addition, a resident with pressure ulcers did not receive necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing. Specifically, a resident had no treatment orders when a new pressure ulcer was identified. The same resident did not have wound measurements of her heel wound since November 2023 and December 2023 for two additional wounds. The heel wound increased in size and there was no re-assessment of the treatment orders. Resident identifier: 21.
Findings include:
Resident 21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Alzheimer's disease, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, open wound left foot, major depressive disorder and cutaneous abscess of left lower limb.
On 2/5/24 at 1:52 PM, an interview was conducted with resident 21. Resident 21 stated she thought she had sores on her body. Resident 21 stated she did not have pain from her sores. Resident 21 stated her sores were kept covered with dressings.
On 2/5/24 at 4:10 PM, the facility provided the CMS-802 form. Resident 21 was listed to have a stage 2 and a stage 4 pressure ulcer.
Resident 21's medical record was reviewed 2/5/24 through 2/7/24.
A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed resident 21 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 7 which suggested severe cognitive impairment. The MDS further revealed resident 21 had 1 or more unhealed stage 1 or higher pressure ulcer, three stage 3 pressure ulcers and one stage 4 pressure ulcer. The MDS revealed skin and ulcer treatments were pressure reducing device for bed, turning/repositioning program, nutrition or hydration interventions to manage skin problems, pressure ulcer care, application of nonsurgical dressing other than to feet, applications of ointments/medications other than to feet, and application of dressing to feet.
A care plan dated 1/19/21 and revised on 12/4/23 revealed, The resident has potential impairment to skin integrity of the peri area/buttocks r/t [related to] contact dermatitis d/t [due to] incontinence.
Scratches & picks at her skin. Multiple wounds at various stages of healing. Stage 4 L heel with h/o [history of] Osteomyelitis. The goal was The resident will maintain or develop clean and intact skin by the review date. Interventions included the following:
a. Antibiotics per Medical Doctor (MD) order was initiated on 6/1/23.
b. Encourage good nutrition and hydration in order to promote healthier skin was initiated on 1/19/21 and revised on 3/17/21.
c. Follow facility protocols for treatment of injury was initiated on 1/19/21 and revised on 3/17/21.
d. Keep skin clean and dry. Use lotion on dry skin was initiated on 1/19/21 and revised on 3/17/21.
e. The resident needs pressure relief pad to protect the skin while IN BED was initiated on 1/19/21 and revised on 3/17/21.
f. The resident needs pressure relief pad to protect the skin while up IN CHAIR was initiated on 1/19/21 and revised on 3/17/21.
g. Wound care per MD order was initiated on 5/13/21.
A physician's order dated 6/25/21 revealed, left lateral calf Q3D [every 3 days] Clean skin with wound cleanser or normal saline and gauze. If open: Skin prep where drsg will cover. May use santyl on slough, or xenaderm, calcium alginate, Cover with Adhesive foam drsg. Change every 3-7 days, until healed. D/C [discontinue] when healed. one time a day every Mon [Monday], Wed [Wednesday], Fri [Friday].
Another physician's order dated 6/25/21 revealed, (right distal and lateral calf) Q3D Clean skin with wound cleanser or normal saline and gauze. If open: Skin prep where drsg will cover. May use santyl on slough, or xenaderm, calcium alginate, Cover with Adhesive foam drsg. Change every 3-7 days, until healed. D/C when healed. one time a day every Mon, Wed, Fri.
A physician's order dated 6/25/21 revealed, Assess wound (right calf distal and medial)for: (A. Increased redness, B. Increased drainage, C. warm to the touch, D. Bleeding, E. Dressing intact, F. Draining thru dressing, G. Need to change the drsg, H. No Drainage, I. Increased pain, J. Notify physician, K. Notify family every shift).
A physician's order dated 6/25/21 revealed, Assess wound left lateral calf for: (A. Increased redness, B. Increased drainage, C. warm to the touch, D. Bleeding, E. Dressing intact, F. Draining thru dressing, G. Need to change the drsg, H. No Drainage, I. Increased pain, J. Notify physician, K. Notify family every shift).
A physician's order dated 1/15/24 revealed, Juven Oral Packet (Nutritional Supplements) Give 1 packet by mouth every morning and at bedtime related to MODERATE PROTEINCALORIE MALNUTRITION .; UNSPECIFIED OPEN WOUND, LEFT FOOT, SEQUELA.
A physician's order dated 1/15/24 revealed, Premier Protein 11oz two times a day related to UNSPECIFIED PROTEINCALORIE MALNUTRITION.
A physician's order dated 6/8/21 revealed, Med Pass 2.0 after meals (4OZ) for added nutrition.
According to a hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE], resident 21 had pressure ulcers of bilateral lower extremities with an open wound to right foot and lower leg.
A nursing progress note dated 9/9/23 at 4:34 PM, revealed .The wounds on both feet had saturated dressings on them. I removed the dressings, legs are extremely dry, scaly and a lot of dead skin. I washed her legs and patted them dry. I cleansed the wounds on the left shin and heel. The sore on the left shin measures 2.5 cm X 2.5cm in diameter. It is beefy red and good blood flow. I placed a poly memfoam pad and covered with a dressing. The left heel has improved, it measures 5.0cm (L) x 5.5cm (W); has beefy red wound bed and good blood flow. I placed a silver poly mem foam pad and covered with a heel dressing. The right foot, the 5th toe had a lot of drainage and the area on the bottom of food [sic]has several open areas. I cleansed it with wound cleanser, patted it dry. I put silver poly mem between 4th and 5th toe; applied poly mem around the base of the toe and bottom of foot and covered with a foam dressing and tape. Will have DON assess the foot and give us suggestions for wound treatment. Booties put on both feet.
A nursing progress note dated 11/14/23 at 4:38 PM, revealed .Pillows for support, booties on both feet. She was medicated for pain with scheduled and PRN [as needed] pain medication with good effect. Her appetite has been fair today. She was given additional snacks and fluids. She drank the nutritional supplements. I changed the dressing on her left heel again today, cleansed with NS [normal saline] and patted dry, polymem foam applied to wound bed and foam dressing covering the wound. The wound measured 4.5cm [centimeter] (L) [length] x [by] 4.0cm (W)[width]. Minimal drainage noted.
A nursing progress note dated 12/10/23 at 4:35 PM, revealed .Resident had personal care given and repositioned in bed. Pillows for support and booties on her feet. She has been assisted with her meals. Medicated for pain with scheduled and PRN pain medication with good effect. I changed the dressings on the R [right] foot. The two are ason [sic] the outer bottom of the foot are almost healed. I put a dressing on them for protection. The sore on the bottom of the R small toe was cleansed and patted dry. It measured approximately 2.0 cm(L) x 1.5 cm (w). I put a piece of polymem foam in the wound bed and covered it with a dressing. I changed the dressing on the left shin. The wound was cleansed with NS [normal saline] and patted dry. I put a small piece of poly mem foam and covered with a foam dressing. It measured 2.0 cm (L) X 2.0 cm (W). The left heel dressing was changed. I cleansed the area with NS and patted it dry, applied poly mem foam to the wound bed and covered it with a foam dressing. The wound is filling in from the outer perimeters. She had a medium loose BM this shift. Had 450cc output.
A physician's visit dated 12/12/23, revealed resident 21 had chronic wounds on her legs. The physician documented, I am actually pretty surprised at home [sic] much improvement we have seen in the wounds. She had a very big gaping wound on her left heel that was infected months ago and that is actually close down quite a bit to where she just has about a 4 cm [centimeters] wound which is pretty crazy. I think care center is been doing a good job changing her dressing and monitoring her wounds as she has made some steady improvement. We will continue with these interventions hopefully get theses healed up all the way and then at that point preventions again to be the biggest key.
A nursing skilled charting assessment dated [DATE], revealed resident did not weight bear, had decreased sensation, required assistance with bed mobility, and required assistance with eating. The assessment further revealed Resident is bed-ridden; requires all care done by staff. The Skin/Wound section revealed, Old hematomas on arms from scratching; lotion applied; Nystatin to abdominal fold. Wounds in various stages of healing on both legs; feet and dressing changed as per treatment orders.
On 2/6/24 at 11:24 AM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON stated if a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) noticed a wound on a resident, the nurse was notified, and then the nurse would assess the wound and notify the physician to obtain orders to treat the wound. The DON stated resident 21 had wounds on the back of her legs and a wound on her left shin for about 3 to 4 years. The DON stated she had a pressure sore on her left heel and a wound under her right pinky toe. The DON stated the wound under the pinky toe was the size of the tip of a pen. The DON stated resident 21 was on hospice under wounds on her hips had healed. The DON stated she dressed resident 21's pinky toe wound on 2/3/24. The DON stated she used a foam dressing and it was to be changed weekly or when saturated. The DON stated that CNA reported to the nurse if a dressing was saturated. The DON stated there were no physician's orders for the pinky toe wound. The DON stated that nurses would call and ask her what dressings to use. The DON stated she Failed on documentation. The DON stated she did not have measurements on resident 21's wounds for a long time.
On 2/6/24 at 1:23 PM, a follow-up interview was conducted with the DON. The DON stated there were no physician orders for the wound below the pinky toe. The DON stated she changed all of resident 21's dressings on Saturday night. The DON stated she did not know when resident 21's wound below the pinky toe opened. The DON stated she did not have a policy and procedure for wounds.
On 2/6/24 at 1:29 PM, a phone interview was conducted with Physician 1's Medical Assistant (MA). The MA stated she talked to Physician 1 and Physician 1 stated he was not aware of a new wound on resident 21. The MA stated Physician 1 stated that he was aware that resident 21 had chronic wounds. The MA stated that staff usually texted Physician 1 regarding new skin issues and then Physician 1 provided treatment orders.
On 2/6/24 at 1:43 PM, an interview was conducted with CNA 1. CNA 1 stated when a resident was bathed she looked at their skin. CNA 1 stated if there were skin issues, she reported to the nurse to have the nurse look at the resident. CNA 1 stated resident 21 had a left heel wound, left calf wound, and something on her right foot. CNA 1 stated resident 21 had her feet and legs in booties so they were floating and not touching the bed. CNA 1 stated resident 21 had a body pillow that they used to rotate her every 2 hours. CNA 1 stated resident 21 had an air mattress. An observation was made of resident 21's legs and feet with CNA 1. Resident 21 was observed in bed with a sheet over her feet and legs. CNA 1 removed the sheet and there were booties on each foot. There was a bandage on the left shin. CNA 1 lifted resident 21's left leg and there was a bandage on the left heel. CNA 1 lifted resident 21's right foot and there was a bandage on the bottom of the foot below the pinky toe. The bandages were dated 2/3/24.
On 2/6/24 at 10:56 AM, an interview was conducted with Registered Nurse (RN) 1. RN 1 stated that the nurses changed wound dressings when the dressing was soiled or leaked through. RN 1 stated that the DON changed bandages when she did wound rounds. RN 1 stated that the DON completed measurements on wounds.
On 2/7/24 at 8:00 AM, an interview was conducted with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 1. LPN 1 stated that the DON had changed resident 21's wound dressings on Tuesday night 2/6/24.
On 2/7/24 at 8:09 AM, an interview was conducted with the DON. The DON stated she changed resident 21's dressings on Tuesday night 2/6/24. The DON stated she measured the wounds because the measurements had not been done for a while. The DON stated she took pictures and talked to Physician 1 to obtain wound orders. The DON stated resident 21's wounds were healing and did not know when the pinky toe wound opened up. The DON stated she was going to be measuring wounds on Tuesdays so she changed the wound dressings orders to Tuesday and Friday. The DON stated that she had not been tracking measurements of wounds.
The DON provided the measurements obtained on 2/6/24. The left heel measured at 8.5 cm (L) x 6.5 cm (W) x 0.1 cm depth (D). The left shin was 2.8 cm (L) x 2.5 cm (W) x 0.1 cm (D). The wound below the right pinky toe on the ball of foot was 0.4 cm (L) x 0.4 cm (W) x 0.1 cm (D). The note dated 12/10/23 was the last note of measurements. The left shin measurements were 2.0 cm (L) X 2.0 cm (W). The sore on the bottom of the R small toe measured approximately 2.0 cm(L) x 1.5 cm (w). The previous measurement for the left heel were dated 11/14/23. The measurements were 4.5cm (L) x 4.0cm (W). It should be noted the left heel increased in size with no changes to the wound dressing orders since 6/25/21.
On 2/12/24 at 11:32 AM, a phone interview was conducted with the DON. The DON stated she was not aware that resident 21's heel wound was larger than the previous measurement in November 2023. The DON stated there were no changes to the treatment orders since June 2021 for the heel and shin wound. The DON did not provide information for why treatments were not changed or different treatments tried since June 2021.
On 2/13/24 at 8:30 AM, a phone interview was conducted with the DON. The DON stated on the left heel wound she measured the picture and not the outline of the wound on 2/6/24. The DON stated the wound was actually 4.9 cm (L) by 5 cm (W). The DON confirmed the previous measurements were completed in November 2023 for the left heel wound.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Notification of Changes
(Tag F0580)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 20 sampled residents, that the facility did not no...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 20 sampled residents, that the facility did not notify the resident's physician when there was a signigicant change in the resident's physical, mental or psychosical status or when there was a need to alter treatment significantly. Specifically, a resident developed a new wound and the physicain was not notified. In addition, the resident did not have physician's orders to treat the wound. Resident identifier: 21.
Findings include:
Resident 21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Alzheimer's disease, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, open wound left foot, major depressive disorder and cutaneous abscess of left lower limb.
On 2/5/24 at 1:52 PM, an interview was conducted with resident 21. Resident 21 stated she thought she had sores on her body. Resident 21 stated she did not have pain from her sores. Resident 21 stated her sores were kept covered with dressings.
On 2/5/24 at 4:10 PM, the facility provided CMS-802 form. Resident 21 was listed to have a stage 2 and a stage 4 pressure ulcer.
Resident 21's medical record was reviewed 2/5/24 through 2/7/24.
A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed resident 21 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 7 which suggested severe cognitive impairment. The MDS further revealed resident 21 had 1 or more unhealed stage 1 or higher pressure ulcer, three stage 3 pressure ulcers and one stage 4 pressure ulcer. The MDS revealed skin and ulcer treatments were pressure reducing device for bed, turning/repositioning program, nutrition or hydration interventions to manage skin problems, pressure ulcer care, application of nonsurgical dressing other than to feet, applications of ointments/medications other than to feet, and application of dressing to feet.
A care plan dated 1/19/21 and revised on 12/4/23 revealed, The resident has potential impairment to skin integrity of the peri area/buttocks r/t [related to] contact dermatitis d/t [due to] incontinence. Scratches & picks at her skin. Multiple wounds at various stages of healing. Stage 4 L heel with h/o [history of] Osteomyelitis. The goal was The resident will maintain or develop clean and intact skin by the review date. Interventions included the following:
a. Antibiotics per Medical Doctor (MD) order was initiated on 6/1/23.
b. Encourage good nutrition and hydration in order to promote healthier skin was initiated on 1/19/21 and revised on 3/17/21.
c. Follow facility protocols for treatment of injury was initiated on 1/19/21 and revised on 3/17/21.
d. Keep skin clean and dry. Use lotion on dry skin was initiated on 1/19/21 and revised on 3/17/21.
e. The resident needs pressure relief pad to protect the skin while IN BED was initiated on 1/19/21 and revised on 3/17/21.
f. The resident needs pressure relief pad to protect the skin while up IN CHAIR was initiated on 1/19/21 and revised on 3/17/21.
g. Wound care per MD order was initiated on 5/13/21.
A physician's order dated 6/25/21 revealed left lateral calf Q3D [every 3 days] Clean skin with wound cleanser or normal saline and gauze. If open: Skin prep where drsg will cover. May use santyl on slough, or xenaderm, calcium alginate, Cover with Adhesive foam drsg. Change every 3-7 days, until healed. D/C [discontinue] when healed. one time a day every Mon [Monday], Wed [Wednesday], Fri [Friday].
Another physician's order dated 6/25/21 revealed, (right distal and lateral calf) Q3D Clean skin with wound cleanser or normal saline and gauze. If open: Skin prep where drsg will cover. May use santyl on slough, or xenaderm, calcium alginate, Cover with Adhesive foam drsg. Change every 3-7 days, until healed. D/C when healed. one time a day every Mon, Wed, Fri.
A physician's order dated 6/25/21 revealed, Assess wound (right calf distal and medial) for: (A. Increased redness, B. Increased drainage, C. warm to the touch, D. Bleeding, E. Dressing intact, F. Draining thru dressing, G. Need to change the drsg, H. No Drainage, I. Increased pain, J. Notify physician, K. Notify family every shift).
A physician's order dated 6/25/21 revealed, Assess wound left lateral calf for: (A. Increased redness, B. Increased drainage, C. warm to the touch, D. Bleeding, E. Dressing intact, F. Draining thru dressing, G. Need to change the drsg, H. No Drainage, I. Increased pain, J. Notify physician, K. Notify family every shift).
A physician's order dated 1/15/24 revealed, Juven Oral Packet (Nutritional Supplements) Give 1 packet by mouth every morning and at bedtime related to MODERATE PROTEINCALORIE MALNUTRITION .; UNSPECIFIED OPEN WOUND, LEFT FOOT, SEQUELA.
A physician's order dated 1/15/24 revealed, Premier Protein 11oz two times a day related to UNSPECIFIED PROTEINCALORIE MALNUTRITION.
A physician's order dated 6/8/21 revealed, Med Pass 2.0 after meals (4OZ) for added nutrition.
According to a Discharge summary dated [DATE], resident 21 had pressure ulcers of bilateral lower extremities with an open wound to right foot and lower leg.
A nursing progress note dated 9/9/23 at 4:34 PM, revealed .The wounds on both feet had saturated dressings on them. I removed the dressings, legs are extremely dry, scaly and a lot of dead skin. I washed her legs and patted them dry. I cleansed the wounds on the left shin and heel. The sore on the left shin measures 2.5 cm X 2.5cm in diameter. It is beefy red and good blood flow. I placed a poly memfoam pad and covered with a dressing. The left heel has improved, it measures 5.0cm (L) x 5.5cm (W); has beefy red wound bed and good blood flow. I placed a silver poly mem foam pad and covered with a heel dressing. The right foot, the 5th toe had a lot of drainage and the area on the bottom of food [sic]has several open areas. I cleansed it with wound cleanser, patted it dry. I put silver poly mem between 4th and 5th toe; applied poly mem around the base of the toe and bottom of foot and covered with a foam dressing and tape. Will have DON assess the foot and give us suggestions for wound treatment. Booties put on both feet.
A nursing progress note dated 11/14/23 at 4:38 PM, revealed .Pillows for support, booties on both feet. She was medicated for pain with scheduled and PRN [as needed] pain medication with good effect. Her appetite has been fair today. She was given additional snacks and fluids. She drank the nutritional supplements. I changed the dressing on her left heel again today, cleansed with NS [normal saline] and patted dry, polymem foam applied to wound bed and foam dressing covering the wound. The wound measured 4.5cm [centimeter] (L) [length] x [by] 4.0cm (W)[width]. Minimal drainage noted.
A nursing progress note dated 12/10/23 at 4:35 PM, revealed .Resident had personal care given and repositioned in bed. Pillows for support and booties on her feet. She has been assisted with her meals. Medicated for pain with scheduled and PRN pain medication with good effect. I changed the dressings on the R [right] foot. The two are ason [sic] the outer bottom of the foot are almost healed. I put a dressing on them for protection. The sore on the bottom of the R small toe was cleansed and patted dry. It measured approximately 2.0 cm(L) x 1.5 cm (w). I put a piece of polymem foam in the wound bed and covered it with a dressing. I changed the dressing on the left shin. The wound was cleansed with NS [normal saline] and patted dry. I put a small piece of poly mem foam and covered with a foam dressing. It measured 2.0 cm (L) X 2.0 cm (W). The left heel dressing was changed. I cleansed the area with NS and patted it dry, applied poly mem foam to the wound bed and covered it with a foam dressing. The wound is filling in from the outer perimeters. She had a medium loose BM this shift. Had 450cc output.
A physician's visit dated 12/12/23, revealed resident had chronic wounds on her legs. The physician documented, I am actually pretty surprised at home [sic] much improvement we have seen in the wounds. She had a very big gaping wound on her left heel that was infected months ago and that is actually close down quite a bit to where she just has about a 4 cm [centimeters] wound which is pretty crazy. I think care center is been doing a good job changing her dressing and monitoring her wounds as she has made some steady improvement. We will continue with these interventions hopefully get theses healed up all the way and then at that point preventions again to be the biggest key.
A nursing skilled charting assessment dated [DATE], revealed resident did not weight bear, had decreased sensation, required assistance with bed mobility, and required assistance with eating. The assessment further revealed Resident is bed-ridden; requires all care done by staff. The Skin/Wound section revealed, Old hematomas on arms from scratching; lotion applied; Nystatin to abdominal fold. Wounds in various stages of healing on both legs; feet and dressing changed as per treatment orders.
On 2/6/24 at 11:24 AM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON stated skin evaluations were completed by a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) when they performed bathing. The DON stated if the CNA noticed a wound on a resident, the nurse was notified, and then the nurse would assess the wound and notify the physician to obtain orders to treat the wound. The DON stated resident 21 had wounds on the back of her legs and had a wound on her left shin for about 3 to 4 years. The DON stated she had a pressure sore on her left heel and a wound under her right pinky toe. The DON stated the wound under the pinky toe was the size of the tip of a pen. The DON stated she dressed resident 21's pinky toe wound on 2/3/24. The DON stated she used a foam dressing and it was to be changed weekly or when saturated. The DON stated that the CNA reported to the nurse if a dressing was saturated. The DON stated there were no physician's orders for the pinky toe wound. The DON stated that nurses would call and ask her what dressings to use. The DON stated she Failed on documentation. The DON stated she did not have measurements on resident 21's wounds for a long time.
On 2/6/24 at 1:23 PM, a follow-up interview was conducted with the DON. The DON stated there were no physician's order for the wound below the pinky toe. The DON stated she changed all of resident 21's dressing on Saturday night. The DON stated she did not know when resident 21's wound below the pinky toe opened. The DON stated she did not have a policy and procedure for wounds.
On 2/6/24 at 1:29 PM, a phone interview was conducted with Physician 1's Medical Assistant (MA). The MA stated she talked to Physician 1 and Physician 1 stated he was not aware of a new wound on resident 21. The MA stated Physician 1 stated that he was aware that resident 21 had chronic wounds. The MA stated that staff usually texted Physician 1 regarding new skin issues and then Physician 1 provided treatment orders.
On 2/6/24 at 1:43 PM, an interview was conducted with CNA 1. CNA 1 stated when a resident was bathed she looked at their skin. CNA 1 stated if there were skin issues, she reported to the nurse to have the nurse look at the resident. CNA 1 stated resident 21 had a left heel wound, left calf wound, and something on her right foot. CNA 1 stated resident 21 had her feet and legs in booties so they were floating and not touching the bed. CNA 1 stated resident 21 had a body pillow that they used to rotate her every 2 hours. CNA 1 stated resident 21 had an air mattress. An observation was made of resident 21's legs and feet with CNA 1. Resident 21 was observed in bed with a sheet over her feet and legs. CNA 1 removed the sheet and there were booties on each foot. There was a bandage on the left shin. CNA 1 lifted resident 21's left leg and there was a bandage on the left heel. CNA 1 lifted resident 21's right foot and there was a bandage on the bottom of the foot below the pinky toe. The bandages were dated 2/3/24.
On 2/6/24 at 10:56 AM, an interview was conducted with Registered Nurse (RN) 1. RN 1 stated that the nurses changed wound dressings when the dressing was soiled or leaked through. RN 1 stated that the DON changed bandages when she did wound rounds. RN 1 stated that the DON completed measurements on wounds.
On 2/7/24 at 8:00 AM, an interview was conducted with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 1. LPN 1 stated that the DON had changed resident 21's wound dressings on Tuesday night 2/6/24.
On 2/7/24 at 8:09 AM, an interview was conducted with the DON. The DON stated she changed resident 21's dressings on Tuesday night 2/6/24. The DON stated she measured the wounds because the measurements had not been done for a while. The DON stated she took pictures and talked to Physician 1 to obtain wound orders. The DON stated resident 21's wounds were healing and did not know when the pinky toe wound opened up. The DON stated she was going to be measuring wounds on Tuesdays, so the dressing changes were changed to Tuesday and Friday, instead of Monday, Wednesday, Friday. The DON stated that she had not been tracking measurements of wounds.
The DON provided the measurements obtained on 2/6/24. The left heel measured at 8.5 cm (L) x 6.5 cm (W) x 0.1 cm depth (D). The left shin was 2.8 cm (L) x 2.5 cm (W) x 0.1 cm (D). The wound below the right pinky toe on the ball of foot was 0.4 cm (L) x 0.4 cm (W) x 0.1 cm (D). The note dated 12/10/23 was the last note of measurements. The left shin measurements were 2.0 cm (L) X 2.0 cm (W). The sore on the bottom of the R small toe measured approximately 2.0 cm(L) x 1.5 cm (w). The previous measurement for the left heel were dated 11/14/23. The measurements were 4.5cm (L) x 4.0cm (W). It should be noted the left heel increased in size with no changes to the wound dressing orders since 6/25/21.
On 2/12/24 at 11:32 AM, a phone interview was conducted with the DON. The DON stated she was not aware that resident 21's heel wound was larger than the previous measurement in November 2023. The DON stated there were no changes to the treatment orders since June 2021 for the heel and shin wound. The DON did not provide information for why treatments were not changed or different treatments tried since June 2021.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 20 sampled residents, that the facility did not provide or obta...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 20 sampled residents, that the facility did not provide or obtain routine dental services. Specifically, a resident stated her dentures did not fit and needed to be adjusted. Resident identifier: 34.
Findings include:
Resident 34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Hemiplegia and hemiparesis, subluxation of left shoulder, heart failure, insomnia, cerebral infarction due to unspecified occlusion or stenosis of cerebral artery, muscle weakness, and type 2 diabetes mellitus.
On 2/5/24 at 2:51 PM, an interview was conducted with resident 34. Resident 34 stated she needed her dentures realigned. Resident 34 stated she was not sure if she had enough money. Resident 34 stated she was able to wear her top dentures and her food was cut up for her to be able to eat it.
Resident 34's medical record was reviewed 2/5/24 through 2/7/24.
An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed no dental issues. The MDS revealed resident 34 had Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicated cognition was intact.
Nursing Progress notes revealed the following:
a. On 10/17/23 at 4:29 PM, Resident asked me to cancel the dental appointment for her d/t [due to] her not feeling well. We will reschedule when she is feeling better.
b. On 10/18/23 at 2:31 PM, [Resident 34] has a blister on her upper left gum from getting food caught between her gum and denture. She doesn't want anyone to see her w/o [without] her dentures, so she has been staying in her room and drinking soda and soups so that her gum can heal.
On 2/7/24 at 9:26 AM, an interview was conducted with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1. CNA 1 stated resident 34 had not heard her complain about her dentures for a while because she was taking them out at night. CNA 1 stated she thought resident 34's dentures fit. CNA 1 stated she complained of sores in her mouth a while ago because she was not willing to take her dentures out at night. CNA 1 stated resident 34 completed her own oral hygiene.
On 2/7/24 at 9:28 AM, an interview was conducted with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 1. LPN 1 stated she had not heard of any problems with her mouth or dentures.
On 2/7/24 at 10:16 AM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON stated resident 34 did not have chewing or swallowing problems. The DON stated resident 34 had not been to the dentist and had not complained of dentures not fitting. The DON stated the MDS coordinator worked offsite. The DON stated resident 34 had dentures with no teeth and it should have been on the MDS that way.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0655
(Tag F0655)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, for 1 of 20 sampled residents, it was determined the facility did not develop and implemen...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, for 1 of 20 sampled residents, it was determined the facility did not develop and implement a baseline care plan that included the instructions needed to provide effective and person centered care of the resident that met professional standards of quality care, and be developed within 48 hours of the resident's admission. Specifically, the resident's care plan was developed 5 days after the resident was admitted to the facility. Resident identifier: 19.
Findings include:
Resident 19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included fracture of coccyx, muscle weakness, displaced fracture of left humerous, encephalopathy, chronic kidney disease, type 2 diabetes, major depressive disorder and dementia.
Resident 19's medical records were reviewed between 2/5/23 and 2/7/23.
A review of resident 19's careplan revealed focus areas initiated on 11/22/23 included:
a. The resident had an ADL (activities of daily living) performance deficit r/t (related to) unsteadiness, dementia. Interventions included, BATHING/SHOWERING: The resident needs max assist of one staff; BED MOBILITY: The resident requires max assist with one staff to turn and reposition in bed; DRESSING: Allow sufficient time for dressing and undressing; EATING: The resident is able to feed self after setup help from staff; PERSONAL HYGIENE: The resident requires max assist with one staff with personal hygiene and ora care; TOILET USE: The resident requires mod (moderate) assist of one staff for toileting; TRANSFER: The resident requires limited assist with one staff.
b. The resident had impaired cognitive function/dementia. Interventions included, Administer medications as ordered. Monitor/document for side effects and effectiveness; Communicate with the resident/family/caregivers regarding resident's capabilities and needs; COMMUNICATION: use the resident's preferred name. Identify yourself at each interaction. Face the resident when speaking and make eye contact. Reduce any distrations, turn off TV (television), radio, close the door, etc.; Cue, reorient, and supervise as needed; Keep the resident's routine consistent and try to provide consistent caregivers as much as possible in order to decrease confusion; Prefers to be called [name removed].
c. The resident had diabetes mellitus. Interventions included, Diabetes medications & insulin as ordered by doctor, Monitor/document for side effects and effectiveness; Fasting serum blood sugar as ordered by doctor; Refer to podiatrist/foot care nurse to monitor/document foot care needs and to cut long nails.
d. The resident was at HIGH risk for falls r/t unsteady h/o (history of) falling at home resulting in fracture. Interventions included, Anticipate and meet the resident's needs; Be sure the resident's call light is within reach and encourage the resident to use it for assistance as needed. The resident needs prompt response to all requests for assistance; Follow facility fall protocol; PT (physical therapy) evaluate and treat as ordered or PRN; The resident needs a safe environment with even floors free from spills and/or clutter, adequate glare free light, a working and reachable call light, the bed in low position at night, Slide fails as ordered, handrails on walls, personal items within reach; The resident uses bed electronic alarm, ensure the device is in place as needed.
e. The resident used psychotropic medications (Seroquel and zoloft) r/t dementia with depression. Interventions included, Administer PSYCHOTROPIC medications as ordered by physician, monitor for side effects and effectiveness Q-shift (every shift); Monitor/document/report PRN (as needed) any adverse reactions of PSYCHOTROPIC medications, unsteady gait, tardive dyskinesia, EPS (extrapyramidal side effects), frequent falls, refusal to eat, difficulty swallowing, dry mouth, depression, suicidal ideation, social isolation, blurred vision, diarrhea, fatigue, insomnia, loss of appetite, weight loss, muscle cramps, nausea, vomiting, behavioral symptoms not usual to the person; Monitor/record occurance of for target behavior symptoms, pacing, wandering, disrobing, inappropriate response to verbal communication, violence/aggression toward staff/others, etc. and document per facility protocol.
f. The resident had acute pain r/t fracture coccyx. Interventions included, The resident's pain is alleviated/relieved by: rest & current meds; Administer analgesia as per orders. Give 1/2 hours before treatment or care; Anticipate the resident's need for pain relief and respond immediately to any complaint of pain; Evaluate the effectiveness of pain interventions. Review for compliance, alleviating of symptoms, dosing schedules and resident satisfaction with results, impact on functional ability and impact on cognition; Monitor and record pain characteristics: Quality, Severity, Anitomical location, onset, duration, Aggrivating factors, Relieving factors; Report to nurse any change in usual activity attendence patterns or refusal to attend activities related to s/sx (signs or symptoms) or c/o (complaints of) pain or discomfort; The resident is able to ask for medication, tell you how much pain is experienced, tell you what increases or alleviates pain.
g. The resident had potential impairment of skin d/t (due to) incontinence, poor mobility, edema, DM (diabetes mellitus). Interventions included, Encourage good nutrition and hydration in order to promote healthier skin, follow facility protocol for treatment of injury, keep skin clean and dry, use lotion on dry skin.
h. The resident had impaired visual function. Interventions included, Remind resident to wear glasses when reading. Ensure resident is wearing glasses which are clean, free from scratches and in good repair. Report any damage to nurse/family.
[Note: Resident 19's care plan was created 3 days past the 48 hour requirement for baseline care plans]
On 2/7/24 at 9:29 AM, an interview was conducted with Registered Nurse (RN) 1 who stated when a resident was admitted , there was a checklist that she followed to ensure all the important information was collected. RN 1 stated one of the items on the checklist triggered the baseline care plan. RN 1 stated the baseline care plan should be saved in the resident's medical record.
On 2/7/24 at 8:29 AM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON) who stated care plans were created and updated by the MDS (Minimum Data Set) coordinator. The DON stated that the MDS coordinator tried to complete a baseline care plan as soon as the resident was admitted . The DON stated the baseline care plan should be initiated within 48 hours of the resident's admission.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that, for 5 of 20 sampled residents, the facility failed to...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that, for 5 of 20 sampled residents, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment. Specifically, care plans were not updated when there was a change in the resident's condition and therefore were not reflective of the services required for the residents to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. Resident identifiers: 9, 14, 21, 22, and 34.
Findings include:
1. Resident 9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included mental disorder, polyosteoarthritis, type 2 diabetes mellitus, sensorineural hearing loss, paralytic syndrome, chronic pain, hypoxemia, lagophthalmos left eye, hallucinations, and malignant neoplasm of brain.
On 2/5/24 at 12:15 PM, an observation was made of resident 9. Resident 9 was sitting at a table in the dining room. Resident 9 fed himself lunch from a divided plate of food, which consisted of three items of pureed food and a bowl of jello.
Resident 9's medical record was reviewed from 2/5/24 through 2/7/24.
The MDS (Minimum Date Set) Annual assessment dated [DATE] revealed resident 10 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10, which indicated a cognitive status of moderately impaired. The MDS further revealed resident 9 did not have swallowing disorders, received a mechanically altered diet and therapeutic diet. The Care Area Assessment (CAA) section revealed nutrition was triggered from the MDS and would be care planned.
A physician's order dated 1/27/22 at 12:35 AM, indicated, CCHO [controlled carbohydrate diet] diet, Regular texture, Regular consistency, Fortified Meals.
The Care Plan dated 5/27/22 indicated, The resident has oral/dental health problems r/t [related to] had all of his teeth extracted, bone graft placed & posts for future dentures placed on 05/24/22. The goal was, The resident will be free of infection, pain or bleeding in the oral cavity by review date. Interventions included, Diet as Ordered. Consult with dietitian and change if chewing/swallowing problems are noted. Another intervention dated 5/24/22 and revised on 7/11/22 on pureed diet while mouth is healing.
A Nutrition Risk Review dated 10/5/23, indicated, CCHO, reg (regular), reg prefers puree d/t (due to) mouth pain.
A Risk Assessment for Eating and Swallowing problems dated 12/16/23 indicated, Does the resident have difficulty chewing, choking or coughing when eating? Pureed, was marked, Yes.
A Multidisciplinary Care Conference document dated 12/22/23 at 1:29 PM, indicated that resident 9's current diet was, CCHO diet. Puree consistency. Divided plate.
On 2/7/24 at 9:37 AM, an interview was conducted with Registered Nurse (RN) 1. RN 1 stated resident 9 had all of his teeth pulled but that he did not wear his dentures because of the pain they caused. RN 1 stated resident 9's family and dentist decided to keep resident on a pureed diet because the resident had tolerated it. RN 1 further stated resident 9 had been on a pureed diet for a long time and believed that was the physician's order.
On 2/7/24 at 10:09 AM, an interview was conducted with the Dietary Manager (DM). The DM reviewed resident 9's meal ticket which indicated resident 9 was on a fortified, puree diet. The DM stated resident 9 had oral surgery and declined to use his dentures. The DM stated a mechanical soft diet was attempted but the resident requested to have a pureed diet. The DM stated there should have been an order for the change in diet.
On 2/7/24 at 10:14 AM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON stated resident 9 had no teeth and he refused to wear his dentures. The DON further stated that he refused to eat a mechanical diet. The DON further stated that the diet served should match what the physician ordered and that if resident 9 was served a regular diet he could choke.
On 2/7/24 at 12:40 PM, a follow-up interview was conducted with the DON. The DON stated that resident 9's care plan had not been updated since 5/27/22 and should have been updated.
2. Resident 14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included malignant neoplasm of endocrine pancreas, type 2 diabetes, neoplasm related pain, anxiety disorder, nausea with vomiting, thrombocytopenia, and occlusion and stenosis of aortic artery.
On 2/5/24 at 2:08 PM, an interview was conducted with resident 14 who stated that in the previous week, he was assisted by a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) out of the tub after bathing. Resident 14 stated that the CNA gathered up the wet towels and wash cloths and turned around to put them in the dirty linen container. As she did this, resident 14 stated he went to dry his legs and the towel he was standing on slipped out from under him and he fell back into the chair he had been sitting on. Resident 14 stated he had pain on his backside after falling back.
Resident 14's medical records were reviewed between 2/5/24 and 2/7/24.
An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed that resident 14 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS further revealed resident 14 had a fall in the month prior to admission to the facility and no falls since admission.
Resident 14's care plan was reviewed. On 2/1/24, a care area was initiated revealing, The resident has had an actual fall (2/1/24) with minor injury d/t [due to] poor balance, weakness. Goals included, The resident will resume usual activities without further incident through the review date. No interventions were listed to prevent additional falls.
Resident progress notes revealed an incident note dated 2/1/24 at 10:35 AM. The note stated, Pt [patient] sitting in weight chair after getting out of tub. Pt drying off with towels. [CNA name removed] put a towel under pt's feet r/t [related to] weight chair and pt dripping with water. [CNA's name removed] states that she took the wet washcloths and towels over to the laundry hamper which were a few steps away from pt and heard the weight chair move. She turned around as pt was climbing out of weight chair and pt's feet slid out from under him while standing on towel. Pt fell backwards and hit his Lt [left] hip and Lt elbow on weight chair. Both pt and CNA state that pt did not hit his head. Pt able to stand, put pressure on Lt hip, and walk. Pt also able to bend and use Lt arm and elbow. Red marks noted to both Lt hip and Lt elbow. Pt assisted with getting dressed. VS [vital signs] taken. BP [blood pressure] 167/87, HR [heart rate] 89, RR [respirations] 20, Temp [temperature] 97.8* F [Fahrenheit], O2 sat [oxygen saturation] 97% RA [room air]. Nursing called [residents family member] and #1 contact, at 0900 (9:00 am) and let her know about fall, pt hitting Lt hip/elbow, and no injuries noted. [Director of nursing name removed] notified at 0904 [9:04 AM], also of pts fall and hit Lt elbow/hip, no other injuries. [Physician name removed] notified at 0918 [9:18 AM]. MD [Medical Doctor] notified of pt's fall, Pt hit Lt elbow/hip, able to stand, move, and ambulate all joints. No other injuries noted. No orders at this time.
On 2/7/24 at 9:11 AM, an interview was conducted with RN 3. RN 3 stated that she did not update the resident's care plan. RN 3 stated after an incident report was completed, she thought it would be provided to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) coordinator, who reviewed the report and updated the resident's care plan.
On 2/7/24 at 1:00 PM, an interview was conducted with the DON. The DON stated they tried to put a new intervention into the care plan every time a resident had a fall. The DON stated the nurses documented what happened in a progress note and an incident report, and the reports would go to the MDS coordinator who would update the care plan. The DON stated the intervention should be relevant to the resident and something they would be able to follow to avoid additional falls.
3. Resident 22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia with other behavioral disturbance, psychophysiologic insomnia, mood disorder with depressive features, and anxiety disorder.
On 2/5/24 at 12:10 PM, an observation was made of resident 22 in the dining room for the lunch meal. Resident 22 received a pureed diet in a divided plate and a cup of jello. Resident 22 also had water and juice to drink with her meal. A Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was sitting between resident 22 and another resident and was assisting resident 22. Resident 22 was unable to feed herself.
Resident 22's medical record was reviewed between 2/5/24 and 2/7/24.
A quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed that resident 22 received a mechanically altered diet. The MDS revealed resident 22 did not have a swallowing disorder. The MDS revealed resident 22 did not have a BIMS score. The MDS further revealed resident 22 had short and long-term memory problems.
A physician's diet order dated 6/29/23 and revised on 1/11/24 revealed, Regular diet, mechanical soft texture, regular consistency.
Resident 22's care plan included:
a. The resident has an ADL (activities of daily living) self-care performance deficit r/t dementia, initiated on 2/9/2020 and revised on 6/12/23. The goal The resident will maintain the current level of function in ADL ability through the review date. Interventions included, EATING: The resident requires max assist by one staff to eat.
b. The resident has a nutritional problem or a potential nutritional problem r/t dementia and refuses to let staff assist her to eat, initiated on 3/4/21 and revised on 6/15/22. The goal The resident will have gradual weight gain to within 10% of IBW [ideal body weight] for sex and height by review date. Interventions included, RD (registered dietitian) to evaluate and make diet change recommendations PRN (as needed). Initiated on 3/4/21; Provide nutrition supplements as ordered: Ensure, initiated 3/4/21.
No information was located in resident 22's care plan indicating difficulty swallowing or the need for a pureed diet. [Note: It should be noted that the last update to the nutrition area of resident 22's care plan was on 6/15/22,]
Resident 22's progress notes were reviewed and there was no documentation indicating a reason for a change in diet texture, or that resident 22's care needs had changed. Additionally, a progress note dated 12/12/23 revealed, Med Pass has been d/c'd (discontinued) per family request.
An IDT (Interdisciplinary Team) care conference dated 12/9/23 revealed, resident intake is 76-100%, with resident 22's diet order documented as mechanical soft regular diet.
On 2/7/24 at 9:23 AM, an interview was conducted with CNA 3. CNA 3 stated that CNA's could look at the resident's care plan to see what information was there to assist then with caring for the residents. CNA 3 stated that the DON and nursing staff kept the CNA's up to date with changes. Additionally, CNA 3 stated the MDS coordinator and resident advocate also let the staff know if there was a change in the resident's care.
On 2/7/24 at 11:44 AM, an interview was conducted with RN 3. RN 3 stated resident 22 did not have difficulty chewing or swallowing food. RN 3 stated the aids in the dining room were complaining that it was taking too long for resident 22 to eat. RN 3 stated it was not like she would not have eaten, it's just a time factor and has been going on for weeks.
4.Resident 21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Alzheimer's disease, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, open wound left foot, major depressive disorder and cutaneous abscess of left lower limb.
On 2/5/24 at 1:52 PM, an interview was conducted with resident 21. Resident 21 stated she thought she had sores on her body. Resident 21 stated she did not have pain from her sores. Resident 21 stated her sores were kept covered with dressings.
On 2/5/24 at 4:10 PM, the facility provided the CMS-802 form. Resident 21 was listed to have a stage 2 and a stage 4 pressure ulcer.
Resident 21's medical record was reviewed 2/5/24 through 2/7/24.
A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed resident 21 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 7 which suggested severe cognitive impairment. The MDS further revealed resident 21 had 1 or more unhealed stage 1 or higher pressure ulcer, three stage 3 pressure ulcers and one stage 4 pressure ulcer. The MDS revealed skin and ulcer treatments were pressure reducing device for bed, turning/repositioning program, nutrition or hydration interventions to manage skin problems, pressure ulcer care, application of nonsurgical dressing other than to feet, applications of ointments/medications other than to feet, and application of dressing to feet.
A care plan dated 1/19/21 and revised on 12/4/23 revealed, The resident has potential impairment to skin integrity of the peri area/buttocks r/t [related to] contact dermatitis d/t [due to] incontinence. Scratches & picks at her skin. Multiple wounds at various stages of healing. Stage 4 L heel with h/o [history of] Osteomyelitis. The goal was The resident will maintain or develop clean and intact skin by the review date. Interventions included the following:
a. Antibiotics per Medical Doctor (MD) order was initiated on 6/1/23.
b. Encourage good nutrition and hydration in order to promote healthier skin was initiated on 1/19/21 and revised on 3/17/21.
c. Follow facility protocols for treatment of injury was initiated on 1/19/21 and revised on 3/17/21.
d. Keep skin clean and dry. Use lotion on dry skin was initiated on 1/19/21 and revised on 3/17/21.
e. The resident needs pressure relief pad to protect the skin while IN BED was initiated on 1/19/21 and revised on 3/17/21.
f. The resident needs pressure relief pad to protect the skin while up IN CHAIR was initiated on 1/19/21 and revised on 3/17/21.
g. Wound care per MD order was initiated on 5/13/21.
A physician's order dated 6/25/21 revealed, left lateral calf Q3D [every 3 days] Clean skin with wound cleanser or normal saline and gauze. If open: Skin prep where drsg will cover. May use santyl on slough, or xenaderm, calcium alginate, Cover with Adhesive foam drsg. Change every 3-7 days, until healed. D/C [discontinue] when healed. One time a day every Mon [Monday], Wed [Wednesday], Fri [Friday].
Another physician's order dated 6/25/21 revealed, (right distal and lateral calf) Q3D Clean skin with wound cleanser or normal saline and gauze. If open: Skin prep where drsg will cover. May use santyl on slough, or xenaderm, calcium alginate, Cover with Adhesive foam drsg. Change every 3-7 days, until healed. D/C when healed. one time a day every Mon, Wed, Fri.
A physician's order dated 1/15/24 revealed, Premier Protein 11oz two times a day related to UNSPECIFIED PROTEINCALORIE MALNUTRITION. It should be noted this was not added to the care plan.
A nursing progress note dated 9/9/23 at 4:34 PM, .The wounds on both feet had saturated dressings on them. I removed the dressings, legs are extremely dry, scaly and a lot of dead skin. I washed her legs and patted them dry. I cleansed the wounds on the left shin and heel. The sore on the left shin measures 2.5 cm X 2.5cm in diameter. It is beefy red and good blood flow. I placed a poly memfoam pad and covered with a dressing. The left heel has improved, it measures 5.0cm (L) x 5.5cm (W); has beefy red wound bed and good blood flow. I placed a silver poly mem foam pad and covered with a heel dressing. The right foot, the 5th toe had a lot of drainage and the area on the bottom of food [sic]has several open areas. I cleansed it with wound cleanser, patted it dry. I put silver poly mem between 4th and 5th toe; applied poly mem around the base of the toe and bottom of foot and covered with a foam dressing and tape. Will have DON assess the foot and give us suggestions for wound treatment. Booties put on both feet.
It should be noted there was another wound documented in this note and was not addressed on the care plan.
A nursing progress note dated 11/14/23 at 4:38 PM revealed, .Pillows for support, booties on both feet. She was medicated for pain with scheduled and PRN [as needed] pain medication with good effect. Her appetite has been fair today. She was given additional snacks and fluids. She drank the nutritional supplements. I changed the dressing on her left heel again today, cleansed with NS [normal saline] and patted dry, polymem foam applied to wound bed and foam dressing covering the wound. The wound measured 4.5cm [centimeter] (L) [length] x [by] 4.0cm (W)[width]. Minimal drainage noted.
A nursing progress note dated 12/10/23 at 4:35 PM revealed, .Resident had personal care given and repositioned in bed. Pillows for support and booties on her feet. I changed the dressings on the R [right] foot. The two are ason [sic] the outer bottom of the foot are almost healed. I put a dressing on them for protection. The sore on the bottom of the R small toe was cleansed and patted dry. It measured approximately 2.0 cm(L) x 1.5 cm (w). I put a piece of polymem foam in the wound bed and covered it with a dressing. I changed the dressing on the left shin. The wound was cleansed with NS [normal saline] and patted dry. I put a small piece of poly mem foam and covered with a foam dressing. It measured 2.0 cm (L) X 2.0 cm (W). The left heel dressing was changed. I cleansed the area with NS and patted it dry, applied poly mem foam to the wound bed and covered it with a foam dressing. The wound is filling in from the outer perimeters. She had a medium loose BM this shift. Had 450cc output.
A nursing skilled charting assessment dated [DATE] revealed resident did not weight bear, had decreased sensation, required assistance with bed mobility, and required assistance with eating. The assessment further revealed Resident is bed-ridden; requires all care done by staff. The Skin/Wound section revealed, Old hematomas on arms from scratching; lotion applied; Nystatin to abdominal fold. Wounds in various stages of healing on both legs; feet and dressing changed as per treatment orders.
On 2/6/24 at 11:24 AM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON stated if a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) noticed a wound on a resident, the nurse was notified, and then the nurse would assess the wound and notify the physician to obtain orders to treat the wound. The DON stated resident 21 had wounds on the back of her legs and a wound on her left shin for about 3 to 4 years. The DON stated she had a pressure sore on her left heel and a wound under her right pinky toe. The DON stated the wound under the pinky toe was the size of the tip of a pen. The DON stated resident 21 was on hospice under wounds on her hips had healed. The DON stated she dressed resident 21's pinky toe wound on 2/3/24. The DON stated she used a foam dressing and it was to be changed weekly or when saturated. The DON stated that CNA reported to the nurse if a dressing was saturated. The DON stated there were no physician's orders for the pinky toe wound. The DON stated that nurses would call and ask her what dressings to use. The DON stated she Failed on documentation. The DON stated she did not have measurements on resident 21's wounds for a long time.
On 2/6/24 at 1:23 PM, a follow-up interview was conducted with the DON. The DON stated there were no physician orders for the wound below the pinky toe. The DON stated she changed all of resident 21's dressing on Saturday night. The DON stated she did not know when resident 21's wound below the pinky toe opened. The DON stated she did not have a policy and procedure for wounds.
On 2/6/24 at 1:29 PM, a phone interview was conducted with Physician 1's Medical Assistant (MA). The MA stated she talked to Physician 1 and Physician 1 stated he was not aware of a new wound on resident 21. The MA stated Physician 1 stated that he was aware that resident 21 had chronic wounds. The MA stated that staff usually texted Physician 1 regarding new skin issues and then Physician 1 provided treatment orders.
On 2/7/24 at 8:09 AM, an interview was conducted with the DON. The DON stated she changed resident 21's dressings on Tuesday night 2/6/24. The DON stated she measured the wounds because the measurements had not been done for a while. The DON stated she took pictures and talked to Physician 1 to obtain wound orders on 2/6/24. The DON stated resident 21's wounds were healing and did not know when the pinky toe wound opened up. The DON stated she would be measuring wounds on Tuesdays and that the wound dressing change orders had been changed to Tuesday and Friday for that purpose. The DON stated that she had not been tracking measurements of wounds.
The DON provided the measurements obtained on 2/6/24. The left heel measured at 8.5 cm (L) x 6.5 cm (W) x 0.1 cm depth (D). The left shin was 2.8 cm (L) x 2.5 cm (W) x 0.1 cm (D). The wound below the right pinky toe on the ball of foot was 0.4 cm (L) x 0.4 cm (W) x 0.1 cm (D). The note dated 12/10/23 was the last note of measurements. The left shin measurements were 2.0 cm (L) X 2.0 cm (W). The sore on the bottom of the R small toe measured approximately 2.0 cm(L) x 1.5 cm (w). The previous measurement for the left heel were dated 11/14/23. The measurements were 4.5cm (L) x 4.0cm (W). It should be noted the left heel increased in size with no changes to the wound dressing orders since 6/25/21.
On 2/12/24 at 11:32 AM, a phone interview was conducted with the DON. The DON stated she was not aware that resident 21's heel wound was larger than the previous measurement in November 2023. The DON stated there were no changes to the treatment orders since June 2021 for the heel and shin wound. The DON did not provide information for why treatments were not changed or different treatments tried since June 2021.
On 2/13/24 at 8:30 AM, a phone interview was conducted with the DON. The DON stated on the left heel wound she measured the picture and not the outline of the wound on 2/6/24. The DON stated the wound was actually 4.9 cm (L) by 5 cm (W). The DON confirmed the previous measurements were completed in November 2023 for the left heel wound.
5. Resident 34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Hemiplegia and hemiparesis, subluxation of left shoulder, heart failure, insomnia, cerebral infarction due to unspecified occlusion or stenosis of cerebral artery, muscle weakness, and type 2 diabetes mellitus.
On 2/5/24 at 2:51 PM, an interview was conducted with resident 34. Resident 34 stated she needed her dentures realigned. Resident 34 stated she was not sure if she had enough money. Resident 34 stated she was able to wear her top dentures and had to have her food cut up for her to be able to eat it.
Resident 34's medical record was reviewed 2/5/24 through 2/7/24.
An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed no dental issues. The MDS revealed resident 34 had Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicated cognition was intact. The MDS revealed resident did not have a loss of natural teeth or tooth fragments (edentulous).
Nursing Progress notes revealed the following:
a. On 10/17/23 at 4:29 PM, Resident asked me to cancel the dental appointment for her d/t [due to] her not feeling well. We will reschedule when she is feeling better.
b. On 10/18/23 at 2:31 PM, [Resident 34] has a blister on her upper left gum from getting food caught between her gum and denture. She doesn't want anyone to see her w/o [without] her dentures, so she has been staying in her room and drinking soda and soups so that her gum can heal.
On 2/7/24 at 9:26 AM, an interview was conducted with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1. CNA 1 stated resident 34 had not complained about her dentures for a while because she was taking them out at night. CNA 1 stated she thought resident 34's dentures fit. CNA 1 stated resident 34 complained of sores in her mouth a while ago because she was not willing to take her dentures out at night. CNA 1 stated resident 34 completed her own oral hygiene.
On 2/7/24 at 9:28 AM, an interview was conducted with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 1. LPN 1 stated she had not heard of any problems with her mouth or dentures.
On 2/7/24 at 10:16 AM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON stated resident 34 did not have chewing or swallowing problems. The DON stated resident 34 had not been to the dentist and had not complained of her dentures not fitting. The DON stated the MDS coordinator worked offsite. The DON stated resident 34 had dentures with no teeth and it should have been on the MDS that way.
On 2/7/24 at 8:28 AM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON stated that the MDS coordinator updated care plans, baseline care plans and comprehensive care plans. The DON stated staff tried to complete baseline care plans. The DON stated care plans were not updated.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, for 2 of 20 sampled residents, the facility failed to ensure residents receiv...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, for 2 of 20 sampled residents, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive assessment, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's preferences. Specifically, a resident who had a change in her diet order was not assessed as having a change in condition, and a resident who developed pneumonia and the flu did not have his change in condition documented until it was necessary to send him to the hospital. Resident identifiers: 22 and 32.
Findings include:
1. Resident 22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia with other behavioral disturbance, psychophysiologic insomnia, mood disorder with depressive features, and anxiety disorder.
On 2/5/24 at 12:10 PM, an observation was made of resident 22 in the dining room for the lunch meal. Resident 22 received a pureed diet in a divided plate and a cup of jello. Resident 22 had water and juice to drink with her meal. A Certified Nursing Assistant [CNA] was sitting between resident 22 and another resident and was assisting resident 22. Resident 22 was not observed to feed herself.
Resident 22's medical record was reviewed between 2/5/24 and 2/7/24.
A quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed that resident 22 received a mechanically altered diet. The MDS revealed resident 22 did not have a swallowing disorder. The MDS revealed resident 22 did not have a BIMS score. The MDS further revealed resident 22 had short and long-term memory problems.
A physician's diet order dated 6/29/23 and revised on 1/11/24 revealed, Regular diet, mechanical soft texture, regular consistency.
A care plan initated on 3/4/21 revealed, The resident has nutritional problem or potential nutrition problem r/t Dementia & refuses to let staff assist her to eat. Goal The resident will have gradual weight gain to within 10% of IBW [Ideal body weight] for sex and height by review date. Interventions included:
a. Invite the resident to activities that promote additional intake.
b. Provide and serve supplements as ordered: Ensure.
c. RD [Registered Dietitian] to evaluate and make diet change recommendations PRN [as needed].
[Note: The care plan did not included documentation that resident 22 had difficulty swallowing.]
Progress notes were reviewed and there was no documentation regarding a change to resident 22's diet or eating patterns.
A risk assessment for eating and swallowing problems dated 9/3/22 revealed, Does the resident have difficulty chewing, choking or coughing when eating? Answered: NO; Does the resident take 20-30 minutes to eat a meal? Answered: YES.
A Quarterly Nutrition assessment dated [DATE] revealed the diet consistency order to be, Regular, mechanical soft, Regular indicating regular diet, mechanical soft texture, regular consistency.
An IDT (Interdisciplinary Team) care conference progress note dated 12/9/23 revealed that resident 22's intake was 76-100% with a diet order of Regular, mechanical soft.
On 2/6/24 at 2:11 PM, an interview was conducted with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 2. CNA 2 stated resident 22 needed extensive assistance with meals and had to be fed. CNA 2 stated resident 22 was receiving a puree diet, and that her diet order had recently changed. CNA 2 stated she did not know why resident 22 had a change in her diet order.
On 2/6/24 at 2:17 PM, a follow-up interview was conducted with CNA 2. CNA 2 stated after inquiring, resident 22 was changed to a puree diet because of having difficulty swallowing.
On 2/6/24 at 2:17 PM, an observation was made of resident 22's paper medical record. No order could be found for a puree diet.
On 2/6/24 at 4:43 PM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON stated that on 2/3/24, she received a request from Registered Nurse (RN) 3 to trial resident 22 with a puree diet. The DON stated that resident 22 did well with a pureed diet and she thought RN 3 had written an order for the diet change. The DON stated she did not know if RN 3 spoke to the physician.
On 2/7/24 at 10:49 AM, an observation was made of resident 22's paper medical record. A telephone order dated 2/3/24 was located for a puree diet and that resident 22 was having difficulty eating the mechanical soft diet.
On 2/7/24 at 11:22 AM, an interview was conducted with RN 1. RN 1 stated anything out of the resident's normal behavior could be considered a change in condition. RN 1 stated it could be a change in behavior, or vital signs anything. RN 1 stated if she had concerns about a resident having a change in condition, she would notify the physician. RN 1 stated a resident's ability to chew or swallow would be a huge change in condition. RN 1 stated if there was a problem for one meal she would not consider it a problem, but would have to observe the resident over time. RN 1 stated she would contact the physician and document what was happening to back it up. RN 1 stated if a diet order needed to be changed, the nurse informed the kitchen staff. RN 1 stated sometimes it takes a couple of times telling the dietary staff to get the change made. RN 1 stated hopefully the resident's change in condition would get passed on in report. RN 1 stated every time the physician gave an order, it should be put into the residents medical record in a progress note, and also in the resident's physician orders. RN 1 stated if the order came as a telephone order, it would be written on a sheet at the nurses station, and then administration ensured the physician signed it. RN 1 stated the next shift might not be aware of an order change until it was put into the resident's electronic medical record and hard chart.
On 2/7/24 at 11:44, an interview was conducted with RN 3. RN 3 stated resident 22 did not have any difficulty chewing or swallowing. RN 3 stated the CNA's in the dining room told her resident 22 was taking a long to eat. RN 3 stated the CNA's let her know about this on 2/3/24. RN 3 stated she asked the kitchen staff if resident 22 could have a trial of pureed food at the lunch meal. RN 3 stated it was not that resident 22 would not eat a mechanical soft diet, but it was a time factor for the CNA's and had been going on for weeks. RN 3 stated she should have documented in a progress note at the time. RN 3 stated she spoke to the DON about doing the trial of a puree diet, and texted the physician about making the change. RN 3 also stated she spoke with resident 22's family member after doing the trial to report that it was successful. RN 3 stated the resident's family member had asked about the appropriateness of a pureed diet a while ago but staff told her that resident 22 was eating ok. RN 3 stated none of the staff had informed her of their concern until 2/3/24. RN 3 stated she would not consider a change in a dietary order to be a change in condition, but a slow gradual and not very noticeable change. RN 3 stated she would inform other staff members by speaking with the CNA's and passing it on in report. RN 3 stated she should be charting concerns about a change in a resident's condition. RN 3 stated she communicated with the physician, through text message, about changing resident 22's diet order, and he texted back quickly. RN 3 stated she contacted the DON who approved the trial of the puree texture. RN 3 stated if a resident was taking longer to eat, having difficulty swallowing or losing weight, those things could possibly indicate a change in condition. RN 3 stated CNA's would write their observations on their daily report paper and pass the information on to the nurse. RN 3 stated she was not always good at charting, but she always made sure that she talked to everyone that was supposed to be notified. RN 3 stated she back-charted the information from the event on 2/3/24 on 2/6/24.
It should be noted that resident 22's diet order was changed in the electronic medical record on 2/6/24.
2. Resident 32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes, major depressive disorder, macular degeneration, dementia, anxiety disorder, insomnia, pneumonia, and influenza A with respiratory manifestations.
Resident 32's medical record was reviewed between 2/5/24 and 2/7/24.
Physician orders included:
a. On 11/28/23, a physician's telephone order revealed, x-ray chest 2 views .CBC [complete blood count]/CMP [complete metabolic panel]/ CRP [C-reactive protein] .Oxygen 2 L [liters] .Ceftriaxone injection 1 G [gram] IM [intramuscularly] daily for 3 days .Azithromycin 500 mg [milligrams] daily for 3 days. Also written on the order, 1st noted 11/29/23 @ 1430 [2:30 PM].
a. On 11/29/23, cough drops mouth/throat lozenge; Give 1 dose by mouth every 1 hours as needed for cough Pt [patient] may have 1 cough drop Q [every] 1 hour PRN [as needed] for cough.
b. On 11/29/23, Please obtain copy of lab results (look under micro) for x-ray test: (chest x-ray 2 views) taken on date (11/29/23). Fax results to [physician name removed]. d/c [discontinue] when obtained et [sic] placed in chart, every shift for 3 days.
On 11/6/23 at 1:56 AM, a nursing progress note revealed, Resident has done well, he ate dinner then went to his room and watched football until he wanted to go to bed.
On 11/17/23 at 3:56 AM, a nursing progress note revealed, Resident has done well this eve. He had dinner and then went to his room and watched TV [television] until 2100 [9:00 PM] when he went to bed.
On 11/29/23 at 10:40 PM, a nursing progress note revealed, 17000-2100 [5:00 PM - 9:00 PM]: [Resident] refused to eat dinner and had some fluids. Day shift reported that he was weak and could not stand. [Resident] talked with staff and others and waited at desk for his N.O. [new order] meds [medications] for pneumonia: Azithromycin 500 mg 1 PO [by mouth] daily for 3 days and Ceftriaxone 1 G [gram] IM [intramuscular] daily for 3 days .[Resident] was offered fluids but he drank very little d/t [due to] his weakness .His family member [name removed] called concerned about his condition and left message to call her back. [Physician name removed] had just called saying that his kidney function was a little decreased and his inflammation levels were high but the x-ray that was done this afternoon did not go through yet. I called [family member] back and she inquired at what point we would send him to the ER [emergency room]. We discussed him having his meds and that we would keep O2 [oxygen] on and keep checking his condition and keep in touch. 2100 [9:00 PM]: He had to be assisted to bed via the lift and 2 aides and was very weak and unable to help. I notified [physician name removed] that his O2 would not go up above 90% without putting O2 mask on and at 4 L [liters] per mask on the concentrator. He [physician] said to send him to the ER. I had to get the [name of hospital removed] staff to bring a bed down for him to be transferred to ER- he left at 2145 [9:45 PM]. 0245 [2:45 AM] [name of hospital removed] staff called and left message that [resident's name removed] tested positive for influenza A and that they are keeping him for a few days.
It should be noted that no progress notes prior to 11/29/23 were found that indicated resident 32 was not feeling well, or had a change in his vital signs.
A physician progress noted dated 11/29/23 revealed resident 32 was seen for a diagnosis of Pneumonia. Physician notes revealed, Patient with acute onset shortness of breath decreased oxygen today. Patient reports congestion. Borderline low oxygen 88 on my examination though noted to be 86. Blood pressure was stable today. Ordered CBC CMP CRP and chest x-ray for further evaluation. COVID testing in the care center was negative. CBC was reassuring. Very mild hyponatremia. CRP was slightly x-ray showed signs concerning for early pneumonia. Patient was started on ceftriaxone azithromycin: Cough drops as needed. Given borderline low oxygen I will put him on 2 L in the meantime and hopeful that we are catching this early enough that he will improve. I called and talked with [family member name removed] about the findings and the plan and patient's presentation. He is okay with workup. Following up with the nursing staff at the care center patient was at the nursing desk still speaking full sentences stating that he has congestion but denies significant chest pain shortness of breath or difficulty breathing. Close follow-up with the patient will be arranged .UPDATE EVENING OF SAME DAY: This evening around 9:30 PM the nurse called me stating he required 4 L of oxygen to maintain saturations he was quite lethargic and less interactive. His oxygen saturation was reported at 90% on 4 L. Facemask. He refused to stand which is rare for him that he use a lift given a bed and he almost fell over. Given the worsening ox [oxygen] requirement in such a short period of time I did recommend evaluation emergency department. I called son and route to the care center to evaluate the patient. He was in agreement for further evaluation at the emergency department. However on evaluation patient looks quite calm. He was on 4 L but definitely not in as much distress as the nursing had reported. He could have just been feeling better with extra oxygen. His lungs sounded worse from this afternoon. More crackles but definitely calm. Nursing was very concerned as previous progression weakness and he is quite a large guy the cannot get him in and out of bed. Given this decreased ability to monitor patient worsening oxygen requirement we felt best to go to the emergency department for further evaluation. 4 L is near the max the hospital can provide locally and if he continues any more oxygen he may need to transfer. However I am hopeful to give antibiotics a bit more time he will start to improve and can either stay in the local hospital come back to the care center this evening.
On 2/6/24 at 3:01 PM, an interview was conducted with RN 2. RN 2 state if there was a concern that a resident was experiencing a change in condition, she would check the resident's vital signs first, then report to the physician. RN 2 stated the physician would advise for need of additional steps. RN 2 stated all information related to a change in a resident's baseline should be documented in the resident's progress note.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0757
(Tag F0757)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 20 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure that eac...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 20 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure that each resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary drugs. An unnecessary drug was any drug when used in excessive dose; or for excessive duration; or without adequate monitoring; or without adequate indication for its use; or in the presence of adverse consequences. Specifically, a resident's medications did not have a diagnoses. Resident identifier: 20.
Findings included:
Resident 20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included atrial fibrillation, hypoxemia, pain in thoracic spine, unsteady on feet, wedge compression fracture, low back pain, pain in hip, heart failure, hypertension and osteoporosis.
Resident 20's medical record was reviewed 2/5/24 through 2/7/24.
Resident 20's physician's orders dated 3/24/2020 revealed Eliquis 2.5 milligrams (mg) twice daily for displaced intertrochanteric fracture of unspecified femur, sequela.
A physician's order dated 3/25/2020 revealed Magnesium Gluconate 500 mg daily for (blank).
On 2/7/24 at 12:12 PM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON stated the diagnosis for Eliquis should be for atrial fibrillation. The DON stated the Magnesium Gluconate needed a diagnosis. The DON stated medications needed diagnoses.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0773
(Tag F0773)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, for 1 of 20 sampled residents, the facility did not obtain laboratory services only when o...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, for 1 of 20 sampled residents, the facility did not obtain laboratory services only when ordered by a physician. Specifically, a resident had laboratory services completed without a physician's order. Resident identifier: 20.
Findings include:
Resident 20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included atrial fibrillation, hypoxemia, pain in thoracic spine, unsteady on feet, wedge compression fracture, low back pain, pain in hip, heart failure, hypertension and osteoporosis.
Resident 20's medical record was reviewed 2/5/24 through 2/7/24.
Resident 20's last physician's orders for laboratory services was on 9/20/22 for a Comprehensive Metabolic Panel (CMP) with a diagnosis of protein malnutrition.
Laboratory values in resident 20's medical record were the following:
1. 4/12/23: Urine analysis
2. 3/17/23: Urine analysis
3. 3/17/23: Urine Culture
4. 3/16/23 B-Type Natriuretic Peptide, Complete Blood Count (CBC) with Auto Diff, CMP, C-reactive protein (CRP), D Dimer, Troponin.
On 2/7/24 at 12:44 PM, an interview was conducted with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 1. LPN 1 stated laboratory values were drawn from the resident on Tuesdays. LPN 1 stated when a resident needed labs done, the physician called the nurse and ordered the labs. LPN 1 stated all labs should have a physician's order so that staff were aware of when to have the labs completed. LPN 1 was unable to find orders for the urine analyses and the other labs.
On 2/7/24 at 12:12 PM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON stated labs needed to have a physician's order to obtain. The DON stated she did not know why there were no physician's orders for the labs that were completed.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0775
(Tag F0775)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review. it was determined for 1 of 20 sampled residents, that the facility did not file in the res...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review. it was determined for 1 of 20 sampled residents, that the facility did not file in the resident's clinical record laboratory (lab) reports that were dated and contained the name and address of testing laboratory. Specifically, the lab results for 3 urinary cultures and sensitivities were not obtained or filed in the resident's medical record. Resident identifier: 19.
Findings include:
Resident 19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included fracture of coccyx, muscle weakness, displace fracture of left humerus, encephalopathy, chronic kidney disease, type 2 diabetes, major depressive disorder and dementia.
Resident 19's medical records were reviewed between 2/5/23 and 2/7/23.
On 12/6/23 at 4:45 PM, a nursing progress note revealed, .She has been c/o [complaining of] lower back and pelvic pain, burning on urination. Staff reported that her urine looks cloudy and there is possible the presence of blood in the urine .At 1230 [12:30 PM], I got a clean catch urine and sent it to [hospital name removed] lab for a UA [urinalysis] dipstick & microscopic; UA C&S [culture and sensitivity]. I notified [Physician name removed] about the urine being sent; her signs and symptoms .
Lab results dated 12/6/23 were returned to the facility for the urinalysis performed on 12/6/23.
On 12/23/23, a telephone order revealed, Send clean catch urine specimen for UA dipstick; Microscopic, UA C&S for N39.0 [UTI]; (2) Bactrim DS [double strength] 1 tab [tablet] PO [orally] BID [twice] x 5 days for N39.0.
Lab results dated 12/21/23 were returned to the facility for the urinalysis performed on 12/21/23.
On 1/19/24, a telephone order revealed, 1. Send urine for UA w/ [with] microscopic C&S for N39.0; 2. Start Bactrim DS 1 tab PO BID x 5 days for UTI.
Lab results dated 1/19/24 were returned to the facility for the urinalysis performed on 1/19/24.
Culture and Sensitivity test results could not be found in resident 19's medical record for 12/6/23, 12/23/23, or 1/191/24.
On 2/6/24 at 3:19 PM, an interview was conducted with Registered Nurse (RN) 2. RN 2 stated resident 19 had a few UTIs. RN 2 stated physicians do not usually order an antibiotic until the results of the C&S had been returned. RN 2 stated resident 19 was having such strong behaviors and the physicain wanted to get her started on something.
On 2/6/24 at 4:17 PM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON stated laboratory tests were sent over to the hospital. The DON stated the hospital sent results back when they were available. The DON stated it took 2 to 3 days for C &S results. The DON stated the nurses would remind her to check for the results by setting up alert charting. The DON stated once the results were back, the results were scanned into the resident's medical record and placed in the hard chart. The DON stated if the results do not come back within a few days, she would get on the computer and try to find the results in the hospital laboratory databse.
On 2/6/24 at 6:00 PM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON) The DON provided copies of the C &S results from 12/6/23, 12/23/23, and 1/19/24. The DON stated she went to the hospital laboratory to obtain the results of the C &S reports.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0779
(Tag F0779)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, it was determined for 1 of 20 sampled residents, that the facility did not file in the res...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, it was determined for 1 of 20 sampled residents, that the facility did not file in the resident's clinical record the signed and dated reports of radiological and other diagnostic services. Specifically, a resident's chest x-ray result was not filed in the medical record. Resident identifier: 32.
Findings include:
Resident 32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes, major depressive disorder, macular degeneration, dementia, anxiety disorder, insomnia, pneumonia, and influenza A with respiratory manifestations.
Resident 32's medical records were reviewed from 2/5/24 to 2/7/24.
A physician's progress noted dated 11/29/23 revealed, DX [diagnosis]: Pneumonia. Patient with acute onset shortness of breath decreased oxygen today. Patient reports congestion. Borderline low oxygen 88 on my examination though noted to be 86. Blood pressure was stable today. Ordered CBC [complete blood count] CMP [complete metabolic panel] CRP [C-reactive Protein] and a chest x-ray for further evaluation. COVID testing in the care center was negative. CBC was reassuring. Very mild hyponatremia. CRP was slightly x-ray showed signs concerning for early pneumonia.
No documentation of resident 32's chest x-ray could be located in the medical record.
On 2/7/24 at 12:07 PM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON stated residents were taken to the hospital if x-rays were needed. The DON stated she did not know why there were no x-ray results in resident 32's medical record.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Dental Services
(Tag F0791)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 20 sampled residents, that the facility did not provide or obta...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 20 sampled residents, that the facility did not provide or obtain routine dental services. Specifically, a resident stated her dentures did not fit and needed to be adjusted. Resident identifier: 34.
Findings include:
Resident 34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Hemiplegia and hemiparesis, subluxation of left shoulder, heart failure, insomnia, cerebral infarction due to unspecified occlusion or stenosis of cerebral artery, muscle weakness, and type 2 diabetes mellitus.
On 2/5/24 at 2:51 PM, an interview was conducted with resident 34. Resident 34 stated she needed her dentures realigned. Resident 34 stated she was not sure if she had enough money. Resident 34 stated she was able to wear her top dentures and her food had to be cut up for her to be able to eat it.
Resident 34's medical record was reviewed 2/5/24 through 2/7/24.
An annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed no dental issues. The MDS revealed resident 34 had Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicated cognition was intact.
Nursing Progress notes revealed the following:
a. On 10/17/23 at 4:29 PM, Resident asked me to cancel the dental appointment for her d/t [due to] her not feeling well. We will reschedule when she is feeling better.
b. On 10/18/23 at 2:31 PM, [Resident 34] has a blister on her upper left gum from getting food caught between her gum and denture. She doesn't want anyone to see her w/o [without] her dentures, so she has been staying in her room and drinking soda and soups so that her gum can heal.
On 2/6/24 at 2:51 PM, an interview was conducted with the Resident Advocate (RA). The RA stated the nurses scheduled dental appointments.
On 2/7/24 at 9:26 AM, an interview was conducted with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1. CNA 1 stated she had not heard her complain about her dentures for a while because she took them out at night. CNA 1 stated she thought resident 34's dentures fit. CNA 1 stated she complained of sores in her mouth awhile ago because she was not willing to take her dentures out at night. CNA 1 stated resident 34 completed her own oral hygiene.
On 2/7/24 at 9:28 AM, an interview was conducted with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 1. LPN 1 stated she had not heard of any problems with her mouth or dentures. LPN 1 stated resident 34 had a dentist appointment but was sick that day and did not go. LPN 1 stated resident 34 stated when she was ready, she would let staff know to reschedule it. LPN 1 stated the appointment was possibly in November 2023.
On 2/7/24 at 10:16 AM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON stated resident 34 did not have any chewing or swallowing problems. The DON stated resident 34 had not been to the dentist and had not complained that her dentures did not fit.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0808
(Tag F0808)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. Resident 9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included mental disorder, pol...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. Resident 9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included mental disorder, polyosteoarthritis, type 2 diabetes mellitus, sensorineural hearing loss, paralytic syndrome, chronic pain, hypoxemia, lagophthalmos left eye, hallucinations, and malignant neoplasm of brain.
On 2/5/24 at 12:15 PM, an observation was made of resident 9. Resident 9 was sitting at a table in the dining room. Resident 9 fed himself lunch from a divided plate of food, which consisted of three items of pureed food and a bowl of jello.
Resident 9's medical record was reviewed from 2/5/24 through 2/7/24.
The MDS (Minimum Date Set) Annual assessment dated [DATE] revealed resident 10 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10, which indicated a cognitive status of moderately impaired. The MDS further revealed resident 9 did not have swallowing disorders, received a mechanically altered diet and therapeutic diet. The Care Area Assessment (CAA) section revealed nutrition was triggered from the MDS and would be care planned.
A physician's order dated 1/27/22 at 12:35 AM, indicated, CCHO [controlled carbohydrate diet] diet, Regular texture, Regular consistency, Fortified Meals.
The Care Plan dated 5/27/22 indicated, The resident has oral/dental health problems r/t had all of his teeth extracted, bone graft placed & posts for future dentures placed on 05/24/22. The goal was, The resident will be free of infection, pain or bleeding in the oral cavity by review date. Interventions included, Diet as Ordered. Consult with dietitian and change if chewing/swallowing problems are noted. An additional intervention included on 5/24/22 on pureed diet while mouth was healing.
A Nutrition Risk Review dated 10/5/23, indicated, CCHO, reg [regular], reg prefers puree d/t [due to] mouth pain.
A Risk Assessment for Eating and Swallowing problems dated 12/16/23 indicated, Does the resident have difficulty chewing, choking or coughing when eating? Pureed, was marked, Yes.
A Multidisciplinary Care Conference document dated 12/22/23 at 1:29 PM, indicated that resident 9's current diet was, CCHO diet. Puree consistency. Divided plate.
On 2/7/24 at 9:37 AM, an interview was conducted with RN 1. RN 1 stated resident 9 had all of his teeth pulled but that he did not wear his dentures because of the pain they caused. RN 1 stated resident 9's family and dentist decided to keep resident on a pureed diet because the resident had tolerated it. RN 1 further stated resident 9 had been on a pureed diet for a long time and believed that was the physician's order.
On 2/7/24 at 10:09 AM, an interview was conducted with the Dietary Manager (DM). The DM reviewed resident 9's meal ticket which indicated resident was on a fortified, puree diet. The DM stated resident 9 had oral surgery and declined to use his dentures. The DM stated a mechanical soft diet was attempted but the resident requested to have a pureed diet. The DM stated there should have been a physician's order for the change in diet.
On 2/7/24 at 10:14 AM, an interview was conducted with the DON. The DON stated resident 9 had no teeth and he refused to wear his dentures. The DON further stated that he refused to eat a mechanical diet. The DON further stated that the diet served should match what the physician ordered and that if resident 9 was served a regular diet he could choke.
Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined for 2 of 20 sampled resident, that the facility did not provide therapeutic diets as prescribed by the attending physician. Specifically, residents were provided puree diets when their prescribed diet was mechanical soft or regular. Resident identifiers: 9 and 22.
Findings include:
1. Resident 22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia with other behavioral disturbance, psychophysiologic insomnia, mood disorder with depressive features, and anxiety disorder.
On 2/5/24 at 12:10 PM, an observation was made of resident 22 in the dining room for the lunch meal. Resident 22 received a pureed diet in a divided plate and a cup of jello. Resident 22 had water and juice to drink with her meal. A Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was sitting between resident 22 and another resident and was assisting resident 22. Resident 22 was unable to feed herself.
Resident 22's medical record was reviewed between 2/5/24 and 2/7/24.
A quarterly MDS dated [DATE] revealed that resident 22 received a mechanically altered diet. The MDS revealed resident 22 did not have a swallowing disorder. The MDS revealed resident 22 did not have a BIMS score. The MDS further revealed resident 22 had short and long-term memory problems.
A physician's diet order dated 6/29/23 and revised on 1/11/24 revealed, Regular diet, mechanical soft texture, regular consistency.
Resident 22's care plan included, The resident has an ADL [activities of daily living] self-care performance deficit r/t [related to] dementia, initiated on 2/9/2020 and revised on 6/12/23. The goal The resident will maintain current level of function in ADL ability through the review date. The intervention stated, EATING: The resident requires max assist by one staff to eat.
A risk assessment for eating and swallowing problems dated 9/3/22 revealed, Does the resident have difficulty chewing, choking or coughing when eating? Answered: NO; Does the resident take 20-30 minutes to eat a meal? Answered: YES.
A Quarterly Nutrition assessment dated [DATE] revealed the diet consistency order to be, Regular, mechanical soft, Regular indicating regular diet, mechanical soft texture, regular consistency.
An IDT (Interdisciplinary Team) care conference progress note dated 12/9/23 revealed that resident 22's intake was 76-100%, diet order was Regular, mechanical soft.
On 2/6/24 at 2:11 PM, an interview was conducted with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 2. CNA 2 stated resident 22 needed extensive assistance with meals and had to be fed. CNA 2 stated resident 22 was receiving a puree diet, and that her diet order had recently changed. CNA 2 stated she did not know why resident 22 had a change in her diet order.
On 2/6/24 at 2:17 PM, a second interview was conducted with CNA 2. CNA 2 stated after inquiring, resident 22 was changed to a puree diet because of having difficulty swallowing.
On 2/6/24 at 2:17 PM, an observation was made of resident 22's paper medical record. No order could be found for a puree diet.
On 2/6/24 at 4:43 PM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON stated that on 2/3/24, she received a request from Registered Nurse (RN) 3 to trial resident 22 with a puree diet. The DON stated that resident 22 did well with a pureed diet and she thought RN 3 had written an order for the diet change. The DON stated she did not know if RN 3 spoke to the physician.
On 2/7/24 at 10:49 AM, a second observation was made of resident 22's paper medical record. A telephone order dated 2/3/24 was located for a puree diet and that resident 22 was having difficulty eating the mechanical soft diet.
On 2/7/24 at 11:44, an interview was conducted with RN 3. RN 3 stated resident 22 did not have any difficulty chewing or swallowing. RN 3 stated the aids in the dining room told her resident 22 was taking a long to eat. RN 3 stated she asked the kitchen staff if resident 22 could have a trial of pureed food at the lunch meal. RN 3 stated it was not that resident 22 would not eat a mechanical soft diet, but it was a time factor and had been going on for weeks. RN 3 stated she should have documented in a progress note. RN 3 stated she spoke to the DON about doing the trial of a puree diet, and texted the physician about making the change. RN 3 also stated she spoke with resident 22's family member after doing the trial to report that it was successful.
It should be noted that resident 22's diet order was changed in the electronic medical record on 2/6/24.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0840
(Tag F0840)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 20 sampled residents, that the facility did not arrange outside...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 20 sampled residents, that the facility did not arrange outside resources in a timely manner for residents. Specifically, a resident with a referral for cataracts to be evaluated was not completed. Resident identifier: 38.
Findings include:
Resident 38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia, psychotic disturbance, mood disorder and macular degeneration.
Resident 38's medical record was reviewed 2/6/24.
A nursing progress note dated 6/8/23 at 4:45 PM revealed, Resident supervised with her care this morning. She c/o [complained of] R [right] eye pain and itching, eye is red from her rubbing it. She does have a history of macular degeneration. Prior to coming here, she had been getting an injection in her eye. She was given PRN [as needed] Tylenol and reported that it had helped some. I suggested that we talk with her family about getting an eye appointment here for her and possibly treatment with medication.
A referral was made by an Optometrist to refer to a local eye center for cataract consult for both eyes dated 6/27/23.
An eye exam dated 6/27/23 revealed, 1. Hypertensive retinopathy, bilateral - order color test, ERG [electroretinography] and photo to document. Monitor q [every] 6 months 2. Age-related nuclear cataract, bilateral - discussed referral to [name removed] eye center [city] for cataract consult. 3. Hypermetropia bilateral - continue with OTC [over the counter] readers until cataract sx [surgery].
A physician's visit dated 7/31/23 revealed, Assessment/Plan: 1. Visual disturbance. The patient complains of some blurriness and visual disturbance in the right eye. She was complaining about this at the last visit and is [sic} I have gotten more familiar with her history it does appear she had some shots in her eyes but has not done what for some time. I told the patient we could at a minimum had her see the ophthalmologist and see what they recommend. She did want to go ahead with this and so hopefully we can get her to see the ophthalmologist next time they come to town. Ordered: Referral to ophthalmology.
A nursing progress note dated 12/1/23 at 4:50 PM revealed, [Physician 1] was in to see resident. He asked if she went to her eye appointment, I told him that it was passed on that her son would take her but she did not make it to the appointment. He said that is her chief complaint is her eyes. He would like us to schedule an appointment for her.
A nursing progress note dated 12/6/23 at 4:40 PM revealed, I called and talked to resident's son, [name removed] about the eye appointment. He was under the impression that we would make the appointment and take her to it. He did not know about the previous appointment. He said if she is to have surgery, that he would take her up. I called and scheduled an appointment with the [name removed] eye specialist that comes to [city removed]. The soonest that she can get in was January 26th, 2024, at 0945. Resident was told about the appointment and we will take her.
On 2/6/24 at 9:46 AM, an interview was conducted with Registered Nurse (RN) 1. RN 1 stated for appointments the nurse called and set-up the appointment. RN 1 said sometimes the Resident Advocate (RA) set up appointments because she was good at arranging transportation. RN 1 stated resident 38 had not been to see an eye doctor but had been seen in house. RN 1 stated the eye doctor came to the facility every month or every other month. RN 1 stated if there was a referral it should be done, so she Can't imagine the cataract consult was not done. RN 1 stated the DON would know if resident 38 went to the cataract appointment. RN 1 stated she did not think resident 38 had cataract surgery.
On 2/6/24 at 1:18 PM, an interview was conducted with the DON. The DON stated that when a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) or resident said something about needing an appointment, then the nurse called and made the appointment. The DON stated staff would see if the family can take the resident first and if they were unable to, the facility staff would provide transport. The DON stated the management team talked about appointments in the morning meetings. The DON stated if a nurse made an appointment, it would be in a nursing note and in the calendar at the nurses station.
On 2/6/24 at 2:48 PM, an interview was conducted with the Resident Advocate (RA). The RA stated that resident 38 had an appointment set up in January and no one took her to the appointment. The RA stated the appointment was rescheduled for 4/26/24. The RA stated she had just called and rescheduled the eye appointment for 2/29/24. The RA stated the Optometrist visited the facility every other month, and April was the next scheduled time. The RA stated she was not sure why there was not an appointment sooner than January 2024 scheduled for resident 38.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0849
(Tag F0849)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, it was determined for 1 of 20 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure that the...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, it was determined for 1 of 20 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure that the hospice services met professional standards and principles that applied to providing services in the facility and to the timeliness of those services. Specifically, the facility did not obtain from the hospice provider the most recent hospice plan of care, physician re-certification of terminal illness, and all communication visit notes were not maintained in the resident's medical record. Resident identifier: 14.
Findings include:
Resident 14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included malignant neoplasm of endocrine pancreas, type 2 diabetes, neoplasm related pain, anxiety disorder, nausea with vomiting, thrombocytopenia, and occlusion and stenosis of aortic artery.
Resident 14's medical records were reviewed between 2/5/24 and 2/7/24.
Resident 14's care plan revealed, The resident has a terminal prognosis r/t [related to] cancer. The goal was The resident's comfort will be maintained through the review date. Interventions included, Consult with physician and social services to have hospice care for resident in the facility and Work cooperatively with hospice team to ensure the resident's spiritual, emotional, intellectual, physical, and social needs are met.
A social service progress note dated 1/2/24 at 10:30 PM revealed, Resident is on hospice.
No hospice notes or communication could be located in resident 14's medical record.
On 2/6/24 at 3:57 PM, an interview was conducted with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 2. CNA 2 stated she received information from the nurse regarding resident 14's needs. CNA 2 stated that she usually worked the night shift so she did not have any contact with the hospice staff.
On 2/6/24 at 4:01 PM, an interview was conducted with Registered Nurse (RN) 2. RN 2 stated, The hospice schedule is random. RN 2 stated hospice social worker, chaplain, nurse came every week. RN 2 stated a couple of different nurses came to the facility. RN 2 stated the facility staff provided all of the resident's care needs, including taking vitals, providing medications and bathing. RN 2 stated the hospice staff mostly came in and asked how the resident was doing. RN 2 stated she only communicated with the resident's primary physician and did not communicate with the hospice physician. RN 2 stated if she was working when the hospice nurse came to the facility she should write a note indicating that the hospice nurse had been in. RN 2 stated she did not know what other staff were doing. RN 2 stated communication was generally verbal. RN 2 stated she followed the orders of the admitting physician and did not deal with the hospice physician. RN 2 stated the staff called hospice staff if they needed anything.
On 2/6/24 at 4:21 PM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON stated, we do everything for hospice, they come in and do extra and above what the facility does. The DON stated when the hospice staff did their visits the staff talked with the hospice staff. The DON stated the hospice sent the facility a copy of their visit notes, if she requested them. The DON stated she would like the nurses documented when the hospice staff came in. The DON stated the hospice provider's physician approved orders for hospice, and wrote orders. The DON stated if a change to the order was made, it would be provided to her on an order form or she would get a copy. The DON stated the facility nurse communicated the orders to the resident's primary physician. The DON stated resident 14 was receiving hospice services the day before his admission to the facility. The DON stated resident 14 discharged from the facility with hospice. The DON stated that the hospice team had come to see resident 14. The DON stated she did not get the hospice agreement filled out for resident 14. The DON stated she did not know the staff for resident 14's hospice provider and had not communicated with them.
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Drug Regimen Review
(Tag F0756)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, it was determined for 5 of 20 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure that eac...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, it was determined for 5 of 20 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure that each resident's drug regimen was reviewed once a month by the licensed pharmacist, and that any irregularities were reported to the physician and were acted upon. Specifically, monthly pharmacy reviews were not being conducted between July 2023 and January 2024. Resident identifiers: 14, 19, 20, 22 and 32.
Findings include:
1. Resident 14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included malignant neoplasm of endocrine pancreas, type 2 diabetes, neoplasm related pain, anxiety disorder, nausea with vomiting, thrombocytopenia, and occlusion and stenosis of aortic artery.
Resident 14's medical record was reviewed between 2/5/24 and 2/7/24.
No pharmacy reviews were located in resident 14's medical record.
2. Resident 19 was admitted to the facility initially on 4/17/22 and then again on 11/17/23 with diagnoses that included fracture of coccyx, muscle weakness, displace fracture of left humerous, encephalopathy, chronic kidney disease, type 2 diabetes, major depressive disorder and dementia.
Resident 19's medical record was reviewed between 2/5/24 and 2/7/24.
Resident 19's last pharmacy review was completed on 1/30/23. There were no other pharmacy reviews located in resident 19's medical record.
3. Resident 22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia with other behavioral disturbance, psychophysiologic insomnia, mood disorder with depressive features, and anxiety disorder.
Resident 22's medical record was reviewed between 2/5/24 and 2/7/24.
Resident 22's last pharmacy review was completed on 7/20/23. There were no other pharmacy reviews located in resident 22's medical record after 7/20/23.
4. Resident 32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes, major depressive disorder, macular degeneration, dementia, anxiety disorder, insomnia, pneumonia, and influenza A with respiratory manifestations.
Resident 32's medical record was reviewed between 2/5/24 and 2/7/24.
Resident 32's last pharmacy review was completed 5/24/23. There were no other pharmacy reviews located in resident 32's chart after 5/24/23.
5. Resident 20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included atrial fibrillation, hypoxemia, pain in thoracic spine, unsteady on feet, wedge compression fracture, low back pain, pain in hip, heart failure, hypertension, and osteoporosis.
Resident 20's medical record was reviewed 2/5/24 through 2/7/24.
Resident 20's last pharmacy review was completed on 7/28/23. There were no other pharmacy reviews located in resident 20's medical record.
Pharmacy reviews were requested. The Pharmacist provided a binder with 3 recommendations from July 2023.
On 2/6/24 at 8:17 AM, an interview was conducted with the Pharmacist and the Administrator. The Pharmacist stated he had a medical emergency in August 2023 and had not completed medication reviews since then. The Pharmacist stated the last time he was at the facility to document his medication regimen reviews was July 2023. The Administrator stated there was no Pharmacist to fill in while the facility Pharmacist was unavailable.
On 2/7/24 at 12:12 PM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON stated she had not received any pharmacy recommendations since August 2023. The DON stated no other Pharmacist had been asked to complete reviews while the facility pharmacist was not available. The DON stated the Pharmacist signed the order summaries every month but there were no recommendations from those.
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. Resident 14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included malignant neoplasm of endocrine pancreas, typ...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. Resident 14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included malignant neoplasm of endocrine pancreas, type 2 diabetes, neoplasm related pain, anxiety disorder, nausea with vomiting, thrombocytopenia, and occlusion and stenosis of aortic artery.
Resident 14's medical records were reviewed between 2/5/24 and 2/7/24.
Physician orders included:
a. Venlafaxine HCL (Hydrochloride) ER (extended release) oral capsule 75 mg (milligrams); Give 2 capsules by mouth in the morning related to anxiety disorder.
b. Olanzapine oral tablet 5 mg; Give 1 tablet by mouth at bedtime.
d. Mirtazapine oral tablet 7.5 mg; Give 1 tablet by mouth at bedtime.
e. Ativan oral tablet 2 mg; Give 1 tablet by mouth every 8 hours as needed for anxiety/agitation.
An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed that resident 14 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment.
A review of the admission Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 1/1/24 revealed care areas triggered were cognitive loss/dementia and psychotropic drug use.
A review of resident 14's care plan initiated on 12/18/23, revealed no care focus areas addressing his use of psychotropic medications, monitoring for behaviors or having dementia.
No pharmacy reviews of psychotropic medications were found in resident 14's medical record.
On 2/5/24, psychotropic reviews were completed by the Director of Nursing [DON} and the pharmacist. Resident 14 discharged on 2/5/24 and a psychotropic review was not completed for this resident.
3. Resident 19 was admitted to the facility initially on 4/17/22 and then again on 11/17/23 with diagnoses that included fracture of coccyx, muscle weakness, displace fracture of left humerous, encephalopathy, chronic kidney disease, type 2 diabetes, major depressive disorder and dementia.
Resident 19's medical records were reviewed between 2/5/24 and 2/7/24.
Physician orders included:
a.Quetiapine Fumarate tablet 100 mg; Give 1 tablet by mouth at bedtime related to major depressive disorder.
b. Sertraline oral capsule 100 mg; Give one capsule by mouth one time a day related to major depressive disorder. (Discontinued 2/6/24)
c. Sertraline oral capsule 150 mg; Give one capsule by mouth one time a day related to major depressive disorder. (Started 2/6/24)
Physician orders for monitoring of antidepressant target behaviors and antidepressant medication side effects were not found in resident 19's medical record.
An admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed that resident 19 had a BIMS score of 11, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment.
A review of resident 19's CAA dated 11/21/23 revealed care areas triggered were cognitive impairment/dementia and use of psychotropic drugs.
A care plan created on 1/16/24 revealed, Resident has delusions, paranoia or hallucinations. The goal was, Resident will not make delusional or paranoid statements. Interventions included the following:
a. Do not argue, criticize or correct the resident.
b. Help resident to feel safe.
c. Remind resident that resident is safe.
A care plan created on 1/26/24 revealed, Resident has mental health issue/depression. The goal was, Resident will verbalize relief of symptoms of mental illness when asked. Interventions included the following:
a. Encourage pursuit of activities and hobbies.
b. Offer music of resident's choice.
A care plan created on 1/22/23 revealed, Resident has cognitive function/dementia. The goal was, The resident will be able to communicate basic needs on a daily basis through the review date. Interventions included:
a. Administer medications as ordered. Monitor/document for side effects and effectiveness.
b. Communicate with the resident/family/caregivers regarding residents capabilities and needs.
c. COMMUNICATION: Use the resident preferred name. Identify yourself at each interaction. Face the resident when speaking and make eye contact. Reduce any distractions-turn off TV, radio, close door, etc.
d. Cue, reorient and supervise as needed.
e. Keep the resident's routine consistent and try to provide consistent care givers as much as possible in order to decrease confusion.
A care plan created on 1/22/23 revealed, Resident uses psychotropic medications (Seroquel, Zoloft) r/t dementia and depression. The goal was, The resident will be/remain free of psychotropic drug related complications, including movement disorder, discomfort, hypotension, gait disturbance, constipation/impaction or cognitive/behavioral impairment through review date. Interventions included:
a. Administer psychotropic medications as ordered by physician. Monitor for side effects and effectiveness Q-shift.
b. Monitor/document/report PRN any adverse reactions of PSYCHOTROPIC medications, unsteady gait, tardive dyskinesia, EPS [Extra pyramidal side effects] (shuffling gait, rigid muscles, shaking), frequent falls, refusal to eat, difficulty swallowing, dry mouth, depression, suicidal ideation, social isolation, blurred vision, diarrhea, fatigue, insomnia, loss of appetite, weight loss, muscle cramps, nausea, vomiting, behavior symptoms not usual to the person.
c. Monitor/record occurrences of for target behavior symptoms: pacing, wandering, disrobing, inappropriate response to verbal communication, violence/aggression towards staff/others, etc. and document per facility protocol.
The admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed no Gradual Dose Reductions [GDR] had been attempted and no physician statement for contraindication to GDR had been documented.
4. Resident 22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia with other behavioral disturbance, psychophysiologic insomnia, mood disorder with depressive features, and anxiety disorder.
Resident 22's medical records were reviewed between 2/5/24 and 2/7/24.
Physician orders included:
a. Seroquel (Quetiapine Fumarate) 25 mg; Give .5 tablet by mouth at bedtime related to dementia with behavioral disturbance.
b. Exelon patch 24 hr (hour) 13.3 mg/24 hr; Apply 1 patch transdermally in the morning related to dementia with behavioral disturbance.
c. Lexapro Tablet 20 mg; Give 1 tablet by mouth in the morning related to mood disorder.
d. Buspirone HCL tab 10 mg; Give 1 tablet by mouth three times a day related to anxiety disorder.
Physician orders dated 3/14/19 revealed, antidepressant side effects: {Monitor for significant side effects: common side effects: (A) Sedation, (B) Drowsiness, (C) Dry Mouth, (D) Blurred vision, (E) Urinary Retention, (F) Tachycardia, (G) Muscle Tremor, (H) Agitation, (I) Headache, (J) Skin Rash, (K) Photosensitivity/skin, (L) Weight Gain, (M) Suicidal Thinking/Behaviors, (N) Other.
Physician orders dated 3/14/23 revealed, antipsychotic behaviors: 1. Hallucination, 2. Delusions, 3. Paranoid Statements, 4. Continuously crying out (greater than 15 minutes= 1 episode).
Physician orders dated 3/14/23 revealed, Antidepressant target behaviors: 1. Symptoms of anxiety (SOB V Worry, nervous pacing, irritability, restlessness V anxiety, wringing of hands) 2. V. Sadness, 3. Tearfulness/crying, 4. V. Hopelessness, 5. Negative comments about self or situation.
Physician orders dated 3/14/19 revealed, Anti-anxiety behaviors monitor for 1. Restlessness, 2. Verbalizes anxiety, 3. wringing of hands, 4. nervous pacing, 5. Irritability, 6. Verbalizes worry, 7. Shortness of breath.
An annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed resident 22 had a BIMS score of 99, which indicated severe cognitive impairment and inability to be evaluated.
A quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed the last GDR attempt was 6/6/22.
A review of resident 22's CAA dated 9/7/23 revealed care areas triggered were cognitive loss/dementia, behavior symptoms, and use of psychotropic medications.
A care plan created on 6/13/19 revealed, Resident has anxiety and depression r/t dementia. The goal was, The resident will exhibit indicators of depression, anxiety, or sad mood less than daily by review date. Interventions included:
a. Administer medications as ordered. Monitor/document for side effects and effectiveness.
b. Monitor/document/ report PRN any s/sx of depression, including hopelessness, anxiety, sadness, insomnia, anorexia, verbalizing, negative statements, repetitive anxious or health-related complaints, tearfulness.
c. SS [Social Services] will meet with resident for supportive visits as needed. Staff will help identify personal strengths and abilities. Praise resident for accomplishments.
d. The resident needs time to talk as needed. Encourage the resident to express feelings.
A care plan created on 6/6/23 revealed, Resident has hallucinations. The goal was, Resident will not make paranoid statements. Interventions included:
a. Help resident to feel safe.
b. Remind resident that they are safe.
A care plan created on 3/21/19 revealed, The resident is resistive to cares r/t Anxiety, Dementia. The goal was, The resident will cooperate with care through next review date. Interventions included:
a. Allow the resident to make decisions about treatment regime, to provide sense of control.
b. Encourage as much participation/interaction by the resident as possible during care activities.
c. If resident resists with ADL's (activities of daily living), reassure resident, leave and return 5-10 minutes later and try again.
A care plan created on 8/21/20 revealed, The resident is/has potential to be physically and verbally aggressive r/t dementia. The goal was, The resident will have less than 3 delusions per week through the review date .The resident will not harm self or others through the review date. Interventions included:
a. Redirect resident away from any residents who upset resident. If resident becomes upset, redirect resident to a quiet place away from others so resident can calm down.
b. If resident handles a difficult situation calmly without yelling or hitting tell resident that resident did very well.
c. Explain to resident what you are there to do before you touch the resident.
A physician progress note dated 11/8/23 revealed, It is medically contraindicated to make changes to her psychotropic medications at this time. Also documented, I am aware of the black box warning for the psychotropic drug. The benefits of the medication however, outweigh the risks, especially for this patient. Continue current care .
5. Resident 32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes, major depressive disorder, macular degeneration, dementia, anxiety disorder, insomnia, pneumonia, and influenza A with respiratory manifestations.
Resident 32's medical records were reviewed between 2/5/24 and 2/7/24.
Physician orders included:
a. Seroquel Tablet 100 mg; Take 1 tablet by mouth at bedtime for dementia.
b. Seroquel Tablet 50 mg; Take 1 tablet by mouth in the afternoon for encephalitis.
c. Buspirone HCL oral tablet 5 mg; Take 1 tablet by mouth every morning and at bedtime for dementia.
Physician orders dated 8/22/23 revealed, Antipsychotic medication-monitor for dry mouth, constipation blurred vision, disorientation/confusion, difficulty urinating, hypotension, dark urine, yellow skin, N/V (nausea/vomiting), lethargy, drooling, EPS, symptoms (Tremors, disturbed gait, increased agitation, restlessness, involuntary movement of mouth or tongue). Document: 'Y' if monitored and none of the above observed. 'N' if monitored and any of the above was observed, select chart code 'other/See Nurses Notes' and progress notes findings.
Physician orders dated 8/22/23 revealed, Antipsychotic side effects/observe closely for significant side effects-COMMON SIDE EFFECTS-): Sedation, (B) drowsiness, (C) Dry mouth, (D) Constipation, (E) Blurred Vision, (F) Extra Pyramidal Reaction, (G) Weight Gain, (H) Edema, (I) Postural Hypotension, (J) Sweating, (K) Loss of appetite, (L) Urinary Retention. ATTENTION FOR: (M) Tardive Dyskinesia, (N) Seizure disorder, (O) Chronic constipation, (P) Glaucoma, (Q) Diarrhea, (R) Skin Pigmentation, (S) Jaundice, (T) other.
An MDS dated [DATE] revealed resident 32 had a BIMS score of 8, which indicated moderately impaired cognition.
A care plan dated 12/7/23 revealed, Resident is anxious at times. The goal was Resident will calm down within 10 minutes of becoming anxious. Interventions included:
a. Assist resident to breathe more slowly.
b. Assist resident to think about something calm and peaceful (guided imagery).
A care plan dated 10/13/21 revealed, The resident has impaired cognitive function/dementia or impaired thought processes r/t dementia. The goal was, The resident will develop skills to cope with cognitive decline and maintain safety by the review date. Interventions included:
a. Administer medications as ordered. Monitor/document for side effects and effectiveness.
b. Communicate with the resident/family/caregivers regarding residents capabilities and needs.
c. COMMUNICATION: Use the residents preferred name. Identify yourself at each interaction. Face the resident when speaking and make eye contact. Provide the resident with necessary cues-stop and return if agitated.
d. Cue, reorient, and supervise as needed.
e. Discuss concerns about confusion, disease process, NH (nursing home) placement with resident/family/caregivers.
f. Keep the resident's routine consistent and try to provide consistent care givers as much as possible in order to decrease confusion.
g. Provide the resident with a homelike environment.
No psychotropic reviews were found in resident 32's medical record. Additionally, no documentation was found regarding a GDR for psychotropic medications, or a physician's documentation of contraindication for attempting a GDR.
Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 5 of 20 sampled residents, that the facility did not ensure that residents who used psychotropic drugs received a gradual dose reduction (GDR), and behavioral interventions, unless it was clinically contraindicated. Specifically, residents prescribed psychotropic drugs did not have a GDR attempted. In addition, documentation for contraindication for GDR's were not documented. Resident identifier: 14, 19, 20, 22 and 32.
Findings include:
1. Resident 20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included atrial fibrillation, hypoxemia, pain in thoracic spine, unsteady on feet, wedge compression fracture, low back pain, pain in hip, heart failure, hypertension and osteoporosis.
Resident 20's medical record was reviewed 2/5/24 through 2/7/24.
Resident 20's physician's order dated 4/30/2020 revealed, Pristiq 100 milligrams (mg) to administer 1 tablet by mouth one time a day related to anxiety.
Resident 20's physicians order dated 3/24/2020 revealed, Anti-anxiety behaviors: Monitor for 1. restless, 2. Verbalizes anxiety, 3. Wringing of hands, 4. Nervous pacing, 5. Irritability, 6. Verbalizes worry, 7. shortness of breath every shift.
A care plan dated 6/5/2020 and revised on 2/6/24 revealed, The resident is resistive to care r/t [related to] Anxiety. The goal was, The resident will cooperate with care through next review date. Interventions included the following:
a. Allow the resident to make decisions about treatment regime, to provide sense of control.
b. Encourage as much participation/interaction by the resident as possible during care activities.
c. Provide resident with opportunities for choice during care provision.
Another care plan dated 5/7/2020 and revised on 2/6/24 revealed, The resident has a psychosocial well being problem r/t Anxiety. The goal was, The resident will demonstrate adjustment to nursing home placement by/through review date. The interventions included the following:
a. The resident will verbalize feelings related to emotional state by review date.
b. Encourage participation from resident who depends on others to make own decisions.
c. Provide opportunities for the resident and family to participate in care.
A physician's visit dated 1/10/24 revealed resident 20 had a review of systems, Psychiatric: anxiety, personality change, depression and emotional problems (Generalized anxiety disorder. Depression. Managed with medications.) The current medications listed did not include Pristiq. There was a note, It is medically contraindicated to made [sic] changes to her psychotropic medications at this time. There was no further information why it was contraindicated for resident 20.
On 2/5/24 at 11:00 AM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON stated she had been working with patient care and was unable to complete her DON duties. The DON stated she had not had a psychotropic drug meeting since July 2023.
On 2/6/24 at 8:00 AM, an interview was conducted with the DON. The DON stated she completed her psychotropic meeting on 2/5/24 with the pharmacist. The DON provided the Psychotropic Drug Review form dated 2/5/24. The form revealed the drug was Pristiq 100 mg 1 tablet once daily. The diagnosis was F43.22 (Adjustment disorder with anxiety) and the Interdisciplinary Team recommendations were to maintain with the comments, No changes stable. There was one signature at the bottom of the form for the IDT and it was the Pharmacist. The form did not have targeted behaviors, number of behavioral episodes and if the behaviors had changed.
On 2/7/24 at 12:12 PM, a follow-up interview was conducted with the DON. The DON stated there should be a progress note from the physician regarding why resident had not had a GDR. The DON provided the Physician's note from 1/10/24 regarding why resident 20 was contraindicated for a GDR.
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation and interview it was determined that the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments. Specifically, two refrigerators that contained medications were...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation and interview it was determined that the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments. Specifically, two refrigerators that contained medications were unlocked.
Findings include:
On 2/6/24 at 2:05 PM, an observation was made of the north side nursing station medication refrigerator. The medication refrigerator was unlocked and contained insulin medications.
On 2/6/24 at 2:22 PM, an observation was made of the south side nursing station medication refrigerator. The medication refrigerator was unlocked and contained insulin medications.
On 2/6/24 at 2:22 PM, an interview was conducted with Registered Nurse (RN) 1. RN 1 stated the medication refrigerator contained insulin and suppository medications. RN 1 further stated the south side medication refrigerator did not have a lock on it.
On 2/6/24 at 2:35 PM, an interview was conducted with RN 2. RN 2 stated the medication refrigerator always needed to be locked. RN 2 stated the refrigerator contained insulin, eye drops, and suppository medications.
On 2/6/24 at 4:35 PM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON stated the medication refrigerators contained insulin and suppository medications. The DON stated the refrigerators should be locked at all times and that the south side medication refrigerator did not have a locking mechanism on it.
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined that the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review it was determined that the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections, including COVID-19. Specifically, a staff member tested positive for COVID-19 and was not excluded from working in the facility.
Findings include:
On 2/5/24 upon entering the facility, an interview was conducted with the Administrator. The Administrator stated the Maintenance Director tested positive for COVID-19 that morning. The Administrator stated he fixed the facility washing machine and then tested positive. The Administrator stated he was not feeling well and he was sent home. The Administrator stated the Maintenance Director did not feel good Friday and left early. The Administrator stated the Maintenance Director did not work Saturday or Sunday.
On 2/6/24 at 10:05 AM, an observation was made of the Maintenance Director. The Maintenance Director was wearing a black surgical mask. The Maintenance Director was observed pushing a cart with tools wearing a mask through the 100 hallway. At 11:11 AM, the Maintenance Director was observed walking to the 200 hallway. At 11:14 AM, the Maintenance Director was walking through the 200 hallway with chairs on a flat bed. The Maintenance Director walked past the nurses station and dining room in the 100, 200 and 300 hallway.
On 2/6/24 at 3:00 PM, an interview was conducted with the Administrator. The Administrator stated that he sent the Maintenance Director home because he looked like he was sick. The Administrator stated that because the Life Safety surveyor did not come, he went home and would be back tomorrow.
On 2/6/24 at 3:07 PM, a phone interview was conducted with the Maintenance Director (MD). The MD stated he did not feel good Friday 2/2/24. The MD stated on Saturday 2/3/24, he did some stuff around his house and his bones were hurting. The MD stated he had a fever on Sunday 2/4/24. The MD stated he went to the facility Monday morning 2/5/24 because a washing machine had broken down. The MD stated the Director of Nursing (DON) tested him on Monday and he was positive. The MD stated he wore a mask, used sanitizer and washed his hands when he was in the facility. The MD stated the DON told him to go home for the day and to not come back until his fever was gone. The MD stated his fever broke on 2/5/24 at midnight. The MD stated he did not feel good and went home on 2/6/24 after working a half day. The MD stated the Administrator instructed him to to do what he could and then he could go home. The MD stated he fixed a call light in a resident room that was vacant. The MD stated he put gloves on and fixed the call light. The MD stated he left the facility between 11:30 AM and 12:00 PM.
On 2/6/24 at 4:01 PM, an interview was conducted with the DON. The DON stated if a staff member tested positive for COVID-19, the policy was for the staff member to go home. The DON stated the staff member should stay home until they tested negative after 5 days. The DON stated the facility was having a staffing shortage, so if a staff member was positive they wore a KN94 mask. The DON stated residents were tested if they had symptoms. The DON stated if a staff member was exposed, they wore a KN94 mask. The DON stated it was the Korean brand of KN95 masks. The DON stated the MD tested positive at about 7:30 AM and he came into the facility after the DON. The DON stated the MD talked to the Administrator about something and then he was tested. The DON stated the MD was not tested Friday because he was not having symptoms. The DON stated the MD worked a couple of hours Friday before going home. The DON stated the MD may have checked the washing machine on 2/5/24. The DON stated the MD worked on 2/6/24 and wore a KN94 mask. The DON stated she did not contact the County Health Department or the HAI (Healthcare Associated Infections) team for recommendations. The DON stated the MD was at the facility on 2/6/24 to get ready for his survey. The DON stated the concern with a staff member working with COVID-19 was that it could transfer it to residents or other staff members. The DON stated she tested positive for COVID-19 on New Year's Eve and worked the night shift. The DON stated she used the KN94 mask, performed hand hygiene, and was assigned half of the facility on New Year's Eve.
The KN94 masks were observed. The mask was labeled KF94 and were flat masks with pleats in it, like a surgical mask.
On 2/6/24 at 4:18 PM, an interview was conducted with Registered Nurse (RN) 1. RN 1 stated if a resident was coughing and had a fever she would test the resident for COVID-19 and notify the physician. RN 1 stated no residents had tested positive for COVID-19 since October or November 2023.
On 2/6/24 at 4:26 PM, an interview was conducted with the Administrator. The Administrator stated the Human Resource(HR)/Payroll Director was the last staff member to test positive on 12/31/23. The Administrator stated she was really sick and tested positive for COVID-19. The Administrator stated he did not know if she worked at the facility before or after testing positive for COVID-19 because she worked from home.
On 2/6/24 at 4:26 PM, an interview was conducted with the HR/Payroll Director. The HR/Payroll Director stated she tested positive for COVID-19 after Christmas. The HR/Payroll Director stated she had a cough, sore throat, body aches, fever, chills, coughing, headache and felt awful. The HR/Payroll Director stated she went to work at the facility on 1/2/24 until 1:00 PM because she needed to pick up paperwork to close out payroll. The HR/Payroll Director stated she could not remember if she tested positive on 1/2/24.
According to the Center for Disease Control updated 9/23/22 the Return to Work Criteria for HCP [Healthcare Professional] with SARS-CoV-2 [COVID-19] Infection. The following are criteria to determine when HCP with SARS-CoV-2 infection could return to work and are influenced by severity of symptoms and presence of immunocompromising conditions. After returning to work, HCP should self-monitor for symptoms and seek re-evaluation from occupational health if symptoms recur or worsen. If symptoms recur (e.g., rebound) these HCP should be restricted from work and follow recommended practices to prevent transmission to others (e.g., use of well-fitting source control) until they again meet the healthcare criteria below to return to work unless an alternative diagnosis is identified.
The CDC continued:
HCP with mild to moderate illness who are not moderately to severely immunocompromised could return to work after the following criteria have been met:
At least 7 days have passed since symptoms first appeared if a negative viral test* is obtained within 48 hours prior to returning to work (or 10 days if testing is not performed or if a positive test at day 5-7), and At least 24 hours have passed since last fever without the use of fever-reducing medications, and Symptoms (e.g., cough, shortness of breath) have improved.
*Either a NAAT (molecular) or antigen test may be used. If using an antigen test, HCP should have a negative test obtained on day 5 and again 48 hours later
HCP who were asymptomatic throughout their infection and are not moderately to severely immunocompromised could return to work after the following criteria have been met:
At least 7 days have passed since the date of their first positive viral test if a negative viral test* is obtained within 48 hours prior to returning to work (or 10 days if testing is not performed or if a positive test at day 5-7).
*Either a NAAT (molecular) or antigen test may be used. If using an antigen test, HCP should have a negative test obtained on day 5 and again 48 hours later
HCP with severe to critical illness who are not moderately to severely immunocompromised could return to work after the following criteria have been met:
At least 10 days and up to 20 days have passed since symptoms first appeared, and
At least 24 hours have passed since last fever without the use of fever-reducing medications, and
Symptoms (e.g., cough, shortness of breath) have improved.
The test-based strategy as described below for moderately to severely immunocompromised HCP can be used to inform the duration of work restriction.
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/guidance-risk-assesment-hcp.html
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0882
(Tag F0882)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined the facility did not designate one or more individuals as the infection preventionist (IP) who are responsible for the facility's i...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined the facility did not designate one or more individuals as the infection preventionist (IP) who are responsible for the facility's infection control program.
Findings include:
The facility's Infection control documentation was requested. No Infection Control Surveillance Logs were available from the previous survey 5/5/22 to current.
On 2/6/24 at 4:34 PM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON stated the facility had not had an IP since the previous survey. The DON stated she had not completed the IP training. The DON stated she was unable to fill the IP position because then it would take a nurse from patient care. The DON stated she did not have infection control tracking or trending. The DON stated she should have infection control tracking and trending for each month.
[Cross refer to F880]