SERIOUS
(G)
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Pressure Ulcer Prevention
(Tag F0686)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined, for 2 of 22 sample residents, that the facility did not en...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined, for 2 of 22 sample residents, that the facility did not ensure that a resident received care, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent pressure ulcers and does not develop pressure ulcers unless the individual's clinical condition demonstrated that they were unavoidable; and a resident with pressure ulcers received necessary treatment and services, to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing. Specifically, a resident that was determined to be at risk for developing a pressure ulcer did not have interventions in place to prevent pressure ulcers from developing. The resident developed pressure ulcers that enlarged and one became infected. In addition, another resident's wound was enlarging in size and was not offered to be turned and repositioned. The resident's admission physician's orders were not followed. Resident identifiers: 21 and 45.
Findings include:
1. Resident 45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia without behavioral disturbance, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, acute kidney failure, atherosclerotic heart disease, peripheral vascular disease, mood disorder, and muscle weakness.
On 1/6/20 at 11:40 AM, resident 45 was observed sitting in a wheel chair with bilateral heel protectors.
Resident 45's medical record was reviewed on 1/8/20.
A Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk dated 9/10/19, documented that resident 45 was at risk for pressure sores with a score of 18. [Note: A resident at mild risk for pressure ulcers would have a total score of 15 to 18.]
A Care Plan focus initiated on 9/10/19, documented [Resident 45] has potential for impairment to skin integrity. The goal developed was [Resident 45] will maintain or develop clean and intact skin by the review date. The following interventions were developed:
a. Avoid scratching and keep hands and body parts from excessive moisture. Keep fingernails short.
b. Educate resident 45, family, and caregivers of causative factors and measures to prevent skin injury.
c. Encourage good nutrition and hydration in order to promote healthier skin.
d. Identify and document potential causative factors and eliminate and resolve where possible.
e. Keep skin clean and dry. Use lotion on dry skin.
An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], documented that resident 45 was at risk of developing pressure ulcers. The MDS further documented that resident 45 had a pressure reducing device for chair and bed. The Care Area Assessment section of the MDS documented that Pressure Ulcer was a triggered care area and was addressed in the care plan. [Note: The skin integrity care plan initiated for resident 45 did not include interventions to prevent pressure ulcers including the pressure reducing device for the chair and bed.] Additionally, resident 45 was documented as having a Brief Mental Interview Status (BIMS) score of 3. [Note: A resident that was severely impaired cognitively would have a BIMS score of 00 to 07.] Resident 45 was also documented as requiring extensive one person physical assistance with bed mobility and transfer. [Note: Bed mobility was defined as how a resident moves to and from a lying position, turns side to side, and positions body while in bed or alternate sleep furniture.]
A Nutritional Screen dated 9/13/19 at 3:22 PM, documented that resident 45 was at Normal nutritional status. [Note: A Nutritional Evaluation calculating resident 45's nutritional needs including calories and protein was unable to be located in the medical record.]
A Nursing Progress Note dated 12/2/19 at 3:05 PM, documented Resident has a blister on each heel. New order to keep heels floated while in bed. Apply skin prep to heels BID (two times daily).
A Nursing Progress Note dated 12/3/19 at 10:42 AM, documented Resident is alert and oriented to self only. she has been spending most of her time in bed over the last few weeks. she will sleep most of the day and can be difficult to arouse.
A Nutrition/Dietary Progress Note dated 12/3/19 at 11:11 AM, documented Resident with BMI (body mass index) of 28.4, overweight. Current weight of 150.2# (pounds). Resident is on a regular diet, mechanical soft texture, thin liquids, small portions. PO (by mouth) intake is 50-75% of meals. Resident has blisters to left heel and right medial malleolus. Recommend adding vitamin C and multivitamin/mineral to aid in skin integrity at this time. Will continue to observe.
A Nutrition/Dietary Progress Note dated 12/3/19 at 1:58 PM, documented New order obtained for MVI (multivitamin) with minerals one po QD (every day), Vit (vitamin) C 500 mg (milligrams) po BID. CBC (complete blood count) CMP (complete metabolic panel) scheduled 12/16/19. Will also add to weekly weight monitoring.
A Nursing Progress Note dated 12/3/19 at 2:00 PM, documented New order to increase Skin Prep to Bilat (bilateral) Heels from BID to QID (four times daily).
A Nursing Skin and Nutrition Review dated 12/3/19 at 3:30 PM, documented that for the last 7 days [Resident 45] had an ER (emergency room) visit dt (due to) lethargy. Diagnosed with Hypoxia and UTI (urinary tract infection). New orders for O2 (oxygen) to keep sats (saturations) > (greater than) 90%. Antibiotic ordered. MD (Medical Doctor) later dc'd (discontinued) abx (antibiotic) dt no active UTI noted on UA (urinalysis). Bilat heel blisters noted. Skin Prep and vitamin supplements ordered.
A Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk dated 12/3/19, documented that resident 45 was at risk for pressure sores with a score of 16. [Note: A resident at mild risk for pressure ulcers would have a total score of 15 to 18.]
A Care Plan focus initiated on 12/3/19, documented [Resident 45] has a pressure ulcer (R (right) heel). Additionally, a Care Plan focus initiated on 12/3/19, documented [Resident 45] has a pressure ulcer (L (left) heel). The following interventions were developed for both of the initiated Care Plan focuses:
a. Administer medications as ordered. Monitor and document for side effects and effectiveness.
b. Administer treatments as ordered and monitor for effectiveness.
c. Assess, record, and monitor wound healing. Measure length, width and depth where possible. Assess and document status of wound perimeter, wound bed and healing progress. Report improvements and declines to the MD.
d. Follow facility policies and protocols for the prevention and treatment of skin breakdown.
e. Weekly treatment documentation to include measurement of each area of skin breakdown's width, length, depth, type of tissue, and exudate.
A Nursing Progress Note dated 12/9/19 at 4:08 PM, documented WCC (wound care consultant) Wound nurse in to see resident today and to assess the wounds on both heels. Resident was in bed with heels floating. WCC stated that one of the wounds is miss classified and should be staged as a deep tissue injury rather than a blister. Floor nurse informed and will update the change in classification during her documentation. SW (Social Worker) bought some soft slippers for resident to wear while she is up in her wheelchair to keep her shoes from adding pressure and causing pain, but the slippers are too small and are being taken back for a larger pair.
A Nutritional Screen dated 12/10/19 at 9:05 AM, documented that resident 45 was at Normal nutritional status. [Note: On 12/2/19, resident 45 had developed blisters on bilateral heels. On 12/10/19, resident 45's right medial malleolus blister was reclassified as a right heel pressure deep tissue injury. Resident 45's Weight Summary was reviewed. On 12/3/19, a weight of 154.2# was recorded. On 12/10/19, a weight of 146.8# was recorded. Resident 45 had a 4.80% weight loss in one week. A Nutritional Evaluation calculating resident 45's nutritional needs including calories and protein was unable to be located in the medical record.]
A MD visit note dated 12/11/19, was reviewed. [Note: The MD did not document in the visit note that resident 45 had pressure ulcers to both heels. The MD did not document any treatment orders implemented for resident 45's pressure ulcers.]
A Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk dated 12/13/19, documented that resident 45 was at risk for pressure sores with a score of 16. [Note: A resident at mild risk for pressure ulcers would have a total score of 15 to 18.]
A Nursing Progress Note dated 12/24/19 at 10:44 AM, documented [Resident 45] has deep tissue injuries to bilat feet. Her recent labs show albumin is normal. Her weight is stable. 0.41% gain this week. RD (Registered Dietitian) recommends Zinc 220 mg po QD times 14 days. Order obtained.
A Nursing Progress Note dated 12/25/19 at 4:44 PM, documented Resident is alert with confusion. She c/o (complains of) pain to bilat heels. She receives extensive assist with adls (activities of daily living).
A Nursing Progress Note dated 12/31/19 at 4:46 PM, documented Resident is alert with confusion. Nurse noted that wounds to heels are smaller but the right heel has purulent drainage noted from it. Area is tender to touch. MD notified of the drainage to the wounds. Clindamycin 300 mg tid (three times daily) times 7 days ordered. Skin prep applied to heels with dry dressing to cover. Son notified of infection. Resident receives extensive assist with adls and transfers. She takes her meals with set-up assist. Her appetite is fair.
A physician's order dated 12/31/19, documented clindamycin 300 mg three times daily for infection in heels for 7 days.
A Nursing Progress Note dated 1/1/20 at 4:45 AM, documented Resident had c/o pain when right heel wound was touched at dressing change. Purulent drainage and foul odor noted. Resident kept rubbing her feet on each other, then dressings were noted to be off. She was encouraged to leave the dressings to both heels alone. Abx therapy ongoing. Will continue to monitor.
A Nursing Progress Note dated 1/1/20 at 9:58 AM, documented Infection note: resident is on abx therapy for wounds on heels. the (sic) is slight purulent drainage that is foul smelling to right heel. dark callusing present. left heel is not draining at this time and has the dark callusing. fluids encouraged. heels floated.
A Nursing Progress Note dated 1/2/20 at 9:18 AM, documented Infection note: Resident has dark callusing to bilateral heels. right heel has some slight purulent drainage. it has a foul odor. abx admin (administered) as ordered. dressing done as ordered. heels floated.
A Care Plan focus initiated on 1/2/20, documented [Resident 45] has an infection to deep tissue injury on right heel. The goal initiated was [Resident 45] will be free from complications related to infection through the review date. The following interventions were developed:
a. Administer antibiotic as per MD orders.
b. Maintain universal precautions when providing resident care.
c. Monitor, document, and report to MD signs and symptoms of delirium.
d. Podiatry consult.
e. Treatment per order. Monitor often and notify MD if no improvement.
A Nursing Progress Note dated 1/3/20 at 11:07 AM, documented MD also ordered Podiatry consult. [Resident 45] will be seen 1/6/20 at facility.
A Nursing Progress Note dated 1/3/20 at 5:02 PM, documented Resident had c/o pain to right heel wound at dressing change. Purulent drainage and foul odor noted. Abx therapy ongoing. Will continue to monitor.
A Nursing Progress Note dated 1/3/20 at 10:44 PM, documented Alert charting: Purulent drainage and foul odor noted to right heel. Abx therapy ongoing. dry dressing applied to bilat heels. Will continue to monitor.
A Nursing Progress Note dated 1/4/20 at 3:17 PM, documented Residents right heel has a small amt. (amount) serosanguineous drainage. Abx continues as ordered and tolerated well.
A Nursing Progress Note dated 1/5/20 at 3:00 PM, documented Resident continuous on abx for right heel infection. There is a moderate amount of purulent drainage on dressing removed. Wound is painful to the touch. Dry dressing with Kerlex for drainage.
A Nursing Progress Note dated 1/6/20 at 2:36 PM, documented Resident continues on abx for right heel infection, which seems to be tolerated well. Resident saw [Podiatrist] today for her heels, see referral for new orders.
A Podiatrist visit note dated 1/6/20, documented that resident 45 was brought over by the care center for evaluation, treatment, and recommendation of bilateral heel ulcers. The duration of the ulcers was several weeks. The care center had been treating with various topical treatments and off weighting heel boots were in place. The ulceration of the left posterior lateral aspect was measured at 1.5 centimeters (cm) x 1.8 cm, granulating, stage 2. The ulceration of the right heel posterior lateral aspect was measured at 2.2 cm x 3 cm, unstable fibrin. Upon debridement of the right heel the subcutaneous tissue was exposed.
A Nursing Progress Note dated 1/7/20 at 1:06 AM, documented Alert charting: Resident continues on abx for right heel infection. There is a moderate amt of purulent drainage on dressing removed. Wound is painful to the touch. Dry dressing applied as ordered. Will continue to monitor.
A Nursing Progress Note dated 1/7/20 at 9:22 AM, documented Infection note: Resident has dressing in place to heels. there is no drainage noted to be coming through the dressing. she does c/o pain to the right heel. abx admin as ordered. fluids encouraged. heels floated.
A Nursing Skin and Nutrition Review dated 1/7/20, documented that resident 45 eats meals in the Journeys unit. Resident 45 feeds herself with set up and appetite continues to be fair. Resident 45's weight is up 0.14% from last week but significant loss for one month 6.49%. RD recommends no dietary changes at this time. Resident 45 had no ordered snacks or supplements. Resident 45 had a Zinc supplement times 14 days. [Note: The last Nutritional Screen for resident 45 was completed on 12/10/19. On 12/31/19, resident 45's right heel developed purulent drainage and an antibiotic was initiated. Resident 45's Weight Summary was reviewed. On 12/3/19, a weight of 154.2# was recorded. On 1/7/20, a weight of 144.2# pounds was recorded. Resident 45 had a 6.49% weight loss in one month A Nutritional Evaluation calculating resident 45's nutritional needs including calories and protein was unable to be located in the medical record.]
A review of the Wound Evaluation forms documented the following measurements for the left heel blister:
a. On 12/2/19, 1.51 cm x 1.86 cm. The wound bed was an intact serum filled blister. Treatment included heel suspension protection device.
b. On 12/10/19, 1.62 cm x 1.45 cm. The wound bed was a scab.
c. On 12/17/19, 2.18 cm x 2.6 cm.
d. On 12/24/19, 3.18 cm x 2.86 cm.
e. On 12/31/19, 1.81 cm x 1.38 cm.
f. On 1/9/20, 1.49 cm x 1.43 cm.
A review of the Wound Evaluation forms documented the following measurements for the right heel:
a. On 12/2/19, right medial malleolus blister 3.35 cm x 3.04 cm. The wound bed was an intact serum filled blister. Treatment included heel suspension protection device.
b. On 12/10/19, 3.6 cm x 3.81 cm. The wound bed was pink/red.
c. On 12/10/19, right heel pressure deep tissue injury 3.09 cm x 3.16 cm. The wound bed was pink/red. [Note: The right medial malleolus blister was reclassified as a right heel pressure deep tissue injury.]
d. On 12/17/19, 3.13 cm x 1.81 cm.
e. On 12/24/19, 4.93 cm x 3.51 cm.
f. On 12/31/19, 1.21 cm x 2.42 cm.
g. On 1/9/20, 2.4 cm x 2.19 cm.
A review of physician's orders documented the following entries:
a. On 12/2/19, Skin prep to both heels BID. Float heels while in bed. two times a day for Prophylaxis related to ANEMIA. Order was discontinued on 12/3/19.
b. On 12/3/19, Apply Skin Prep to Left heel would QID four times a day for L heel wound. Order was discontinued on 1/3/20.
c. On 12/3/19, Apply Skin Prep to R heel wound Four times daily four times a day for R heel wound. Order was discontinued on 1/3/20.
d. On 12/3/19, Ascorbic Acid Tablet 500 MG Give 1 tablet by mouth every shift for Supplements.
e. On 12/4/19, Multiple Vitamins-Minerals Tablet Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for Supplement.
f. On 12/25/19, Zinc-220 Capsule (Zinc Sulfate) Give 220 mg by mouth one time a day for Altered skin integrity for 14 Days.
g. On 12/31/19, Clindamycin HCl (hydrochloride) Capsule 300 MG Give 1 capsule by mouth three times a day for infection in heels for 7 Days.
h. On 12/31/19, cover left heel with dry dressing every shift for to promote healing. Order was discontinued on 1/6/20.
i. On 12/31/19, cover right heel with dry dressing every shift for to promote healing. Order was discontinued on 1/6/20.
A Clinic Visit and Progress Note from the Podiatrist dated 1/6/20, documented the following orders:
a. Right heel: Medihoney with gauze bandage. Change every 2 to 3 days.
b. Left heel: Hydrogel with collagen powder. Change every 2 to 3 days.
c. Continue to protect heels from pressure.
On 1/8/20 at 4:01 PM, an interview was conducted with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 2. CNA 2 stated that resident 45 had been more confused since admission. CNA 2 stated that resident 45 required assistance with going to the bathroom. CNA 2 stated that resident 45 was able to eat and drink on her own. CNA 2 stated that resident 45 wore oxygen at night and required that her feet were elevated while she was in bed.
On 1/8/20 at 4:04 PM, an interview was conducted with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 1. LPN 1 stated that resident 45's heel pressure ulcers started the beginning of December. LPN 1 stated that skin prep was initially started on resident 45's heels because the skin was closed. LPN 1 stated that when the skin started to open and had a foul smell resident 45 was started on an antibiotic. LPN 1 stated that the MD did not order cultures of the heel. LPN 1 stated that the facility MD ordered the consult with the podiatrist and the antibiotic on December 31. LPN 1 thought the heel protectors were ordered the middle of December. LPN 1 stated that resident 45 required to have her legs elevated while in bed, skin care with lotion, and repositioned. LPN 1 stated that she had noticed the wounds on resident 45's heels and the shoes that resident 45 was admitted with did not fit right due to resident 45's legs swelling. Resident 45 stated that the heel area of resident 45's shoes were hard. LPN 1 stated that a staff member got resident 45 some slippers.
On 1/9/20 at 7:45 AM, an interview was conducted with CNA 4. CNA 4 stated that turning and repositioning of a resident would be charted under the bed mobility task. CNA 4 stated that she would try and get resident 45 to reposition but resident 45 liked to sleep on her back. CNA 4 stated resident 45 would keep the heel protectors on now that the wounds hurt. CNA 4 stated that prior to the wounds hurting resident 45 would kick the heel protectors off. CNA 4 stated that resident 45's heels were slightly red on admission. CNA 4 stated that it had been the last month and a half that she had tried to put the heel protectors on resident 45. CNA 4 stated that she would try and float resident 45's heels because resident 45 would not float them on her own.
On 1/9/20 at 8:25 AM, an interview was conducted with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON). The ADON stated that resident 45's wounds started as blisters on both heels and they were found on a skin check. The ADON stated that resident 45 had gotten sick and was spending more time in bed. The ADON stated that skin prep was being used on the heels to help toughen up the skin and that would usually work to resolve the blisters. The ADON stated that resident 45's wounds got progressively worse. The ADON stated that the wound specialist had been working with the DON on orders for resident 45's wounds. The ADON stated that resident 45's right heel became infected. The ADON stated that the staff were floating resident 45's heels and slippers were obtained for resident 45 after the blisters were discovered. The ADON stated that a multivitamin with minerals and vitamin C were started. The ADON stated that the RD wanted to wait for resident 45's Albumin prior to making any further recommendations. The ADON stated that when resident 45's laboratory results were received the RD did not recommend a protein supplement but a 14 day course of Zinc was recommended. The ADON stated that a new treatment order was received from the podiatrist on 1/6/19. The ADON stated that the facility MD was at the facility weekly. The ADON stated that the facility MD was made aware when the skin prep was ordered and he was made aware when resident 45's wounds got worse.
On 1/9/20 at 8:30 AM, an interview was conducted with CNA 4. CNA 4 was in the dining room with resident 45 during the breakfast meal. CNA 4 stated that resident 45 ate 100% of her breakfast meal. CNA 4 stated that resident 45 had 1 slice of french toast, oatmeal, sausage, milk, and juice. CNA 4 stated that resident 45 did not drink supplements. CNA 4 stated that resident 45 was able to feed herself independently. CNA 4 stated that resident 45 liked coffee with 2 tablespoons of sugar. CNA 4 stated that resident 45 ate snacks like fig bars and crackers.
On 1/9/20 at 8:52 AM, a phone interview was conducted with the RD. The RD stated she completed a nutritional screen on all residents after admission. The RD stated that if the resident was at risk for malnutrition or had malnutrition then she would complete a nutritional evaluation. The RD stated that resident 45 was not at nutritional risk so she did not complete a nutritional evaluation. The RD stated that since resident 45 was eating good and her cognition was not hindering her oral intake then she did not mark that area of the nutritional screen. The RD stated that if she did not perform a nutritional evaluation then calories and protein needs were not calculated for a resident. The RD stated that a small regular meal provided 1500 to 1800 calories and 88 grams of protein. The RD stated that resident 45 was eating 75 to 100% of meals so she did not feel that resident 45's diet needed to be changed. The RD stated that she calculated resident 45's calorie needs based on resident 45's current weight of 144.2 pounds. The RD stated that she would use 25 to 30 calories per kilogram (kg) of body weight for a total of 1636 to 1963 calories per day. The RD stated that she would use 1.2 to 1.4 grams (g) per kg of body weight to calculate protein needs of 78 to 88 g of protein per day. The RD stated that since resident 45 had a deep tissue injury (DTI) she would not increase resident 45's calculated need to 1.5 to 2.0 g until the DTI was staged high like a stage 3 or 4 pressure ulcer. The RD stated that resident 45 had a DTI and it was not staged at a 3 or 4 pressure ulcer. The RD stated that resident 45 was admitted at a higher weight so she was not concerned that resident 45 had a significant weight increase and then a significant weight decrease because her BMI was considered overweight. The RD stated that weight loss was desirable but did not have a physician's ordered weight loss program in place. The RD stated that she depended on the staff to inform her of resident 45's cognition and eating. The RD stated she was not aware of how much protein resident 45 was eating because she took the percent of meal intake and divided it by how many grams of protein the meal offered and used that to determine resident 45's protein intake. The RD stated she did not know if residents were eating protein foods or not and it was all based on the percentages that the CNAs document.
On 1/9/20 at 9:40 AM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON stated that the RD came into the facility twice weekly and the RD would look at the residents percentage weekly intake. The DON stated that the skin and weight meetings were conducted weekly and the RD was in attendance. The DON stated that the RD would email her recommendations and a conference call would be scheduled weekly with the RD. The DON stated that a resident's nutritional evaluation was done weekly and the RD made recommendations. The DON stated that the WCC nurse was a resource for wound care products. The DON stated that the WCC nurse would come to the facility monthly and give order suggestions. The DON stated that if a pressure ulcer got worse she would expect to get as many eyes on the wound as possible. The DON stated that the facility MD and the WCC nurse saw resident 45's wounds. The DON stated that the WCC nurse resided in Washington State and was not an employee of the facility. The DON stated that the facility had a contract with the company that the WCC nurse worked for. The DON stated that the WCC nurse assessed resident 45's wounds but the WCC nurse would not have notes on resident 45. [Note: The contract was reviewed for the company that employed the WCC nurse. The contract was titled a Business Associate Agreement. A Business Associate Agreement was a written arrangement that specifies each party's responsibilities when it comes to Protected Health Information.]
On 1/9/20 at 11:00 AM, an observation of resident 45's dressing change was conducted with LPN 1. LPN 1 was observed to remove the dressings from resident 45's left and right heel. LPN 1 was observed to take pictures of resident 45's wounds on the left and right heel. LPN 1 stated that the camera images were uploaded into the Wound Evaluation section of the resident medical record. LPN 1 stated that the camera image would automatically do the measurements. LPN 1 stated that once the image was captured she would trace around the wound image on the camera screen and the program would determine the measurements of the wound. LPN 1 stated that the measurements were dependant on the angle the image was captured.
2. Resident 21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included gangrene, urinary tract infection, hypotension, major depressive disorder, psychosis, obsessive-compulsive disorder, sepsis, and dehydration.
On 1/6/20 at 2:50 PM, an interview and observation was conducted with resident 21. Resident 21 stated that she had a wound on her backside that was almost healed. Resident 21 was observed to be sitting in a high back wheelchair in her room. Resident 21 was observed to have a regular mattress.
The facility matrix revealed that resident 21 had a stage 2 pressure ulcer on her buttocks.
Resident 21's medical record was reviewed on 1/8/20.
An admission MDS assessment dated [DATE], revealed that resident 21 was admitted with a stage 2 pressure ulcer. The MDS further revealed that resident 21 had a pressure relieving device to chair and bed, pressure ulcer care, and ointment or medications applied.
A care plan dated 10/23/19 and revised on 10/25/19, revealed [Resident 21] has potential for impairment to skin integrity. [Resident 21] has a wound to her coccyx and surgical wounds to bilat great toes. The goal developed was [Resident 21] will maintain or develop clean and intact skin by the review date. The interventions developed were [Resident 21] will not sustain thermal burn injury related to hot beverage consumption through the next review. Avoid scratching and keep hands and body parts from excessive moisture. Keep fingernails short. Educate [resident 21]/family/caregivers of causative factors and measures to prevent skin injury. Encourage good nutrition and hydration in order to promote healthier skin. Identify/document potential causative factors and eliminate/resolve where possible. Keep skin clean and dry. Use lotion on dry skin as needed. Use caution during transfers and bed mobility to prevent striking arms, legs, and hands against any sharp or hard surface.
Resident 21's admission Discharge Orders from the local hospital dated 10/23/19, revealed Discharge Wound Care Instructions to cleanse with NS (normal saline), apply medihoney and a PUP (pressure ulcer pad) pad.
Resident 21's October, November, and December 2019 Treatment Administration Record (TAR) was reviewed and revealed the following treatment ordered on 10/27/19 and discontinued on 12/8/19, Duoderm to right buttocks every day shift every 3 days for open wound. The December 2019 TAR revealed on 12/4/19, a physician's order for, Cleanse wound with safe cleanse, pat dry apply collagen and hydrogel mixed together and cover with adhesive bordered foam one time a day for wound to right buttocks.
A Nutrition Screen dated 10/26/19, revealed that resident 21's most current weight was 157.8 pounds which was obtained on 12/4/18. The RD documented PO intake is varied with an average of 50-75% of meals. Pressure wound to right buttock, surgical incisions to right and left 1st toes. Recommend adding multivitamin/mineral and vitamin C to aid in wound healing. Protein status is WNL (within normal limits), Alb (albumin) 4.0. A care plan on the form reveled a Focus of The resident has nutritional problem or potential nutritional problem. The care plan goals on the form were [Resident 21] will maintain adequate nutritional status as evidenced by maintaining or gradually losing weight, no s/sx (signs or symptoms) of malnutrition through review date. The interventions dev[TRUNCATED]
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0554
(Tag F0554)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 22 sample residents, that the facility did not assess if a resi...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 22 sample residents, that the facility did not assess if a resident was clinically appropriate to administer medications. Specifically, a resident was not assessed to administer her own inhaler. Resident identifier: 43.
Findings include:
Resident 43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included tibia fracture, urinary tract infection, chronic kidney disease, and pain.
On 1/6/20 at 2:58 PM, an interview was conducted with resident 43. Resident 43 stated that she wanted to have her inhaler on her overbed table and be able to administer it.
Resident 43's medical record was reviewed on 1/7/20.
A physician's order dated 12/10/19, revealed Resident is incapable of administering own medications.
There was no assessment or nurses notes regarding how the decision was made that resident 43 was unable to administer her medications.
On 1/8/20 at 11:19 AM, an interview was conducted with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 1. LPN 1 stated that there were no residents administering their own medications. LPN 1 stated that the physician had to approve the resident for administering their own medications and a lock box would be provided to the resident in their room. LPN 1 stated that resident 43's family member had requested for resident 43 to have her inhaler to administer when she needed it. LPN 1 stated the family made the request about a week ago. LPN 1 stated that she became busy and forgot to talk to resident 43 about administering her own inhaler. LPN 1 stated that upon admission an assessment was completed to determine if residents can self administer medications. LPN 1 stated that all residents have an evaluation completed. LPN 1 stated she thought resident 43 had an evaluation done. LPN 1 was observed to look at resident 43's electronic medical record and stated resident 43 did not have an evaluation completed.
On 1/8/20 at 10:00 AM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON stated she had not heard of anyone who requested to administer their own medications. The DON stated if a resident had a strong desire then staff would monitor and make sure they know how to administer the medications. The DON stated that she had not evaluated resident 43 for administering her own inhaler.
On 1/8/20 at 10:30 AM, the DON provided a template assessment used to evaluate if a resident was safe to administer their own medications. The DON stated that resident 43 did not have an evaluation completed.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0584)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined, for 4 of 22 sample residents, that the facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. Specifically...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined, for 4 of 22 sample residents, that the facility did not provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. Specifically, resident's wheelchairs were dirty, had cracked arm rests, tape on arm rests, and a piece of foil on the back of the motorized wheelchair. Resident identifiers: 4, 36, 43, and 44.
Findings include:
On 1/6/20 at 11:44 AM, an observation was made of resident 44's wheelchair. Resident 44's wheelchair was observed to have bright orange tape on the right arm rest. On 1/9/20 at 7:53 AM, an observation was made of resident 44's wheelchair. Resident 44's wheelchair had bright orange tape on the right arm rest. Resident 44's wheelchair was observed to have dust and debris on the foot rests.
On 1/6/20 at 3:01 PM, an observation was made of resident 43's wheelchair. Resident 43's wheelchair was observed to be soiled. On 1/9/20 at 9:30 AM, an observation was made of resident 43's wheelchair. Resident 43's wheelchair was soiled.
On 1/9/20 at 7:55 AM, an observation was made of resident 36's wheelchair. Resident 36's wheelchair arm rests were observed to be cracked.
On 1/9/20 at approximately 8:00 AM, an observation was made of resident 4. Resident 4's motorized wheelchair was observed to have a piece of foil covering the back of the wheelchair.
On 1/9/20 at 8:00 AM, an interview was conducted with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 4. CNA 4 stated that when a wheelchair needed to be repaired staff would inform the maintenance director. CNA 4 stated that resident 44's wheelchair had the orange tape on the arm rest. CNA 4 stated that resident 44 liked tape and probably placed it there himself. CNA 4 stated that resident 44 was confused. CNA 4 was observed to look at resident 44's wheelchair. CNA 4 stated that resident 44's arm rest was worn under the orange tape. CNA 4 stated that resident 36's wheelchair arm rest was cracked and torn.
On 1/9/20 at 8:05 AM, an interview was conducted with Registered Nurse (RN) 1. RN 1 stated that if a wheelchair needed to be fixed the staff would tell the Maintenance Director. RN 1 stated there was a form for staff to write down wheelchairs that needed to be repaired.
On 1/9/20 at 8:10 AM, an interview was conducted with CNA 8. CNA 8 stated that the maintenance director fixed resident's wheelchairs. CNA 8 stated that resident 4 received her motorized wheelchair back yesterday and she was not aware there was foil on the back of the wheelchair.
On 1/9/20 at 9:40 AM, an interview was conducted with the Maintenance Director (MD). The MD stated if a wheelchair arm rest needed to be repaired staff told him. The MD stated that he had arm rests and was able to replace them in the facility. The MD stated he was unaware that resident 44's and resident 36's arm rests were cracked. The MD stated that he was not aware that resident 4's wheelchair had foil on the back of it. The MD stated that he could get reflective tape for resident 4's wheelchair. The MD stated that staff were able to fill out a work order to write things down that needed to be fixed.
The work order form was observed and there were no entries for arm rests or foil.
On 1/9/20 at 9:45 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 4 and her family member. Resident 4 stated that she received her wheelchair back yesterday. The family member stated that she placed the foil on the back of the wheelchair so that resident 4 was safe at night time. Resident 4 stated that she had not been offered a reflector or reflective tape but would love to have those to be safe.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0676
(Tag F0676)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined, for 1 of 22 sample residents, that the facility did not pr...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined, for 1 of 22 sample residents, that the facility did not provide appropriate treatment and services to maintain or improve his or her ability to carry out the activities of daily living. Specifically, a female resident was observed to have long chin hair. Resident identifier: 43.
Findings include:
Resident 43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included left tibia fracture, urinary tract infection, muscle weakness, and reduced mobility.
On 1/6/20 at 3:00 PM, an observation was made of resident 43. Resident 43 was observed to have chin hair approximately a half inch long.
On 1/7/20 at 4:00 PM, an observation was made of resident 43. Resident 43 was observed to have chin hair approximately a half inch long.
On 1/8/20 at 8:15 AM, an observation was made of resident 43. Resident 43 was observed to have chin hair approximately a half inch long.
Resident 43's medical record was reviewed on 1/8/20.
An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed resident 43 required 2 person extensive assistance for personal hygiene which included shaving, applying makeup, washing/drying face and hands. The MDS further revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 10 which revealed resident 43 had moderate cognitive impairment.
A care plan dated 12/10/19, revealed [Resident 43] has an ADL (activities of daily living) self-care performance deficit. The goal developed was [Resident 43] will maintain current level of ADL function through the review date. The interventions developed were Discuss with [resident 43] /family/POA (power of attorney) care any concerns related to loss of independence, decline in function. Encourage [resident 43] to participate to the fullest extent possible with each interaction. Praise all efforts at self care. [Note: There was no information regarding resident 43 refusing cares.]
On 1/7/20 at 4:07 PM, an interview was conducted with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 3. CNA 3 stated that if she noticed chin hairs on a female resident then she shaved them when they were in the shower. CNA 3 stated that she asked female residents if they would want to have their faces touched up. CNA 3 stated that she would document if a resident refused ADLs on a Chart Sheet. CNA 3 stated that the Chart Sheet had CNA responsibilities on it. CNA 3 provided the Chart Sheet. CNA 3 stated that resident 43 refused to be showered on 1/6/20 but was showered on 1/3/20. CNA 3 stated there was no information documented about resident 43 not wanting her facial hair removed.
On 1/7/20 at 4:33 PM, an interview was conducted with CNA 2. CNA 2 stated normally I will ask if they (resident's) want to be shaved. CNA 2 stated if a resident was unable to respond because they were not cognitively intact, then she would shave the resident during their shower or when getting a bed bath. CNA 2 stated that she was not aware of any female residents that refuse to have their chins shaves. CNA 2 stated that female residents usually wanted their chins shaved. CNA 2 stated that resident 43 might refuse to have her chin hair shaved. CNA 2 stated that she had not showered resident 43. CNA 2 stated that resident 43 had dementia and would forget things.
On 1/8/20 at 3:26 PM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON stated that CNA's shaved resident's during bathing. The DON stated that some residents would refuse to have their ADLs completed. The DON stated that some of the CNA's were afraid of how to approach females with their facial hair.
On 1/8/20 at 3:40 PM, an interview was conducted with CNA 1. CNA 1 stated that resident 43 requested a bed bath on 1/3/20. CNA 1 stated that resident 43, then decided she wanted a shower. CNA 1 stated that she provided resident 43 a shower and resident 43 became anxious and wanted to be done with the shower. CNA 1 stated that she did not remove resident 43's chin hair. CNA 1 stated that she had not asked resident 43 about trimming her facial hair.
On 1/9/20 at 12:15 PM, an observation and interview was conducted with Nursing Assistant (NA) 1. NA 1 stated that resident 43 was not responding so she was changing her oxygen tank. Resident 43 was observed to have chin hairs. Resident 43's eyes were closed and resident 43 was not responding to questions. Resident 43 was asked about having her chin hairs removed and did not respond. NA 1 stated that resident 43 had not refused cares. NA 1 stated that she had provided cares to resident 43 for the last 2 days. NA 1 stated that she had not offered to clear resident 43's chin hair and was not sure why resident 43 had not had the chin hair removed.
Additional information provided by the facility DON on 1/10/20 revealed, When visitors enter our building, we treat them with dignity and respect and do not ask them to alter their appearance or personal grooming to fit other peoples' expectations of how they should look. If we had made suggestions to help them conform to other's expectation, I am sure they would be offended. I feel that we should give our residents the same respect.
I do not believe there is an official standard of what is and is not acceptable as far a (sic) dignified resident appearance. Assuming that the presence of lack of facial hair is part of the residents 'normal' is just an opinion. To respect a resident's rights we need to maintain their perception of normal.
As explained to one of our surveyors, women residents with facial hair are usually not aware that it exists and are not harmed by it. Many CNAs are very good at helping residents feel good about shaving. Some CNAs can help the resident come away feeling as if they had gone to a Spa and had a facial. But if a resident is not concerned about facial hair, reminding them it is there and pressuring them to have it removed frequently is benefiting the caregiver more than the resident. The statement was signed by the DON.
[Note: There was no information located in resident 43's medical record that resident 43 desired to keep her facial hair.]
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined, for 2 of 22 sample residents, that the facility did not en...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined, for 2 of 22 sample residents, that the facility did not ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. Specifically, a resident with edema was not provided compression stockings according to physician's orders and was observed to have weeping edema. In addition, another resident was observed to have eyes that were red, swollen with discharge, and were not treated for 4 days. Resident identifiers: 43 and 46.
Findings include:
1. Resident 43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included left tibia fracture, chronic kidney disease, urinary tract infection, acute kidney failure, and pain.
On 1/6/20 at 3:00 PM, an interview was conducted with resident 43. Resident 43 stated that her feet were swollen. Resident 43 stated that her feet were uncomfortable and she had sores on her legs because of the swelling. Resident 43 was observed to have gripper socks on. Resident 43 stated that her right sock was wet from her leg. Resident 43's sock was observed to be wet.
On 1/7/20 at 4:30 PM, an observation was made of resident 43. Resident 43 was observed to have a wet bed on the lower right side. Resident 43's right pant leg was wet. Resident 43 stated that her leg was leaking fluid. Resident 43 was not observed to have compression stockings on her legs. Resident 43's left leg was observed to be swollen.
On 1/7/20 at 4:45 PM, an interview was conducted with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 2. CNA 2 stated that resident 43 did not have stockings on. CNA 2 stated that staff tried to elevate resident 43's legs but resident 43 refused. CNA 2 stated that resident 43's right leg was leaking and soaked her bed, pant leg, sock, and was on the floor. CNA 2 stated that resident 43 did not have compression stockings or ted hose ordered to apply.
On 1/7/20 at 4:50 PM, an interview was conducted with CNA 3. CNA 3 stated that resident 43's pant leg and bed were wet. CNA 3 stated there was a clear liquid on resident 43's floor in her room and on her pant leg. CNA 3 stated she did not know why resident 43's pant leg and bed were wet. CNA 2 stated to CNA 3 that resident 43's fluid must be coming from her leg. CNA 2 was observed to notify Registered Nurse (RN) 1. RN 1 was observed to enter resident 43's room and was observed to look at resident 43's right leg. CNA 3 stated that resident 43 did not have ted hose or compression stockings to apply.
Resident 43's medical record was reviewed on 1/7/20.
An admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], revealed that resident 43 received diuretics seven times in seven days.
A care plan dated 12/10/19 and revised on 12/31/19, revealed [Resident 43] is on diuretic therapy. The goal developed was [Resident 43] will be free of any discomfort or adverse side effects of diuretic therapy through the review date. The interventions developed were Administer diuretic medications as ordered by physician. Monitor for side effects and effectiveness Q-SHIFT (every shift). Monitor Dose. May require modification in order to achieve desired effects while minimizing adverse consequences, especially when multiple antihypertensives are prescribed simultaneously. When discontinuing, gradual tapering may be required to avoid adverse consequences caused by abrupt cessation. Monitor/document/report PRN (as needed) adverse reactions to DIURETIC therapy: dizziness, postural hypotension, fatigue, and an increased risk for falls. Report pertinent lab (laboratory) results to MD (Medical Doctor).
An initial Physician's Assistant (PA) note dated 12/11/19, revealed that resident 43 had 2+ pedal edema. The PA note further revealed that resident 43 had Venous insufficiency (chronic) peripheral [resident 43] has been taking 2 Furosemide tablets. I recommend compression stocking to bilateral lower extremity. [ Note: During the observations above, resident 43 did not have compression stockings applied.]
Resident 43's progress notes revealed the following entries:
a. On 12/10/19 at 1:58 PM, [AGE] year old female admitted .She has 2+ bilat. (bilateral) pedal edema, is alert and oriented x 3 (person, place and time) .
b. On 12/11/19 at 11:17 AM, . 2+ bilat pedal edema.; .
c. On 12/13/19 at 12:09 AM, . 2+ bilat pedal edema.
d. On 12/13/19 4:09 PM, .she has edema of 1+ to lower legs.
e. On 12/14/19 9:00 AM, .She has edema of 1+ to lower legs.
f. On 12/14/19 9:00 PM, .Edema noted at 3 plus today.; .
g. On 12/16/19 3:01 AM, .weakness to lower extremities, pedal pulses 2+, .
h. On 12/17/19 at 11:03 PM, Resident has continuous weeping from the RLE (right lower extremity). Resident was laid down, feet floated on a pillow covered with two towels and a chuck, and legs elevated.
i. On 12/18/19 at 5:12 PM, .pedal pulses present, 3+ bilat pedal edema.; .
j. On 12/19/19 at 6:52 AM, .She has 3 plus pitting edema to bilat lower extremities.; .
k. On 12/20/19 at 2:45 PM, . Cardio (Cardiopulmonary): She denied chest pain. She has 3 plus noted edema to bilat lower extremities.; Resp (Respiratory): She c/o (complains of) sob (shortness of breath) when up in chair and laying flat.
l. On 12/20/19 at 9:37 PM, . edema noted to LE (lower extremity) with weeping on right LE. Encouraged to keep legs elevated when at rest. 3+ edema on right LE.;.
m. On 12/21/19 at 11:37 AM, .Edema 3 plus.;.
n. On 12/22/19 at 10:00 AM, .1+ pedal edema bilat.; .
o. On 12/22/19 at 11:46 PM, .She has 3 plus noted edema to bilat lower extremities.; .
p. On 12/23/19 at 1:37 PM, .She has edema noted at 3 plus to bilat lower extremities.
q. On 12/24/19 at 4:49 PM, .She has 3 plus edema noted to bilat lower extremities.
r. On 12/24/19 at 11:38 PM, .2+ edema in both LE's. Right LE actively weeping.; .
s. On 12/25/19 at 3:49 PM, .edema noted at 3 plus with weeping noted to ble (bilateral lower extremities).; .
t. On 12/25/19 at 11:40 PM, . 2+ edema on both lower extremities. Right leg weeping.; .
u. On 12/26/19 at 8:09 PM, .Edema 2+ in BLE with RLE weeping.
v. On 12/26/19 at 9:08 PM, .Cardio: Edema 2+ in BLE with RLE weeping.
w. On 12/27/19 at 10:54 PM, .1+ edema to LE encouraged to keep legs elevated.; .
x. On 12/30/19 at 12:18 AM, . she does have edema of 1+ to lower extremities.; .
y. On 12/31/19 at 9:13 AM, .Edema is 3 plus to her legs.
z. On 1/3/20 at 4:03 PM, .Edema 3+ to BLE.; .
aa. On 1/5/20 at 3:07 PM, .1+ bilat. pedal edema.; .
bb. On 1/7/20 at 2:22 PM, .she does have edema of 1+ to left lower extremity.
cc. On 1/7/20 at 5:09 PM, It was noted this today that resident has some weeping to the right lower leg. she has gone through several socks in the last few hours. she is on lasix daily. pa [name removed] notified to see if he would like a dressing or more of a wrap done.
dd. On 1/7/20 at 5:44 PM, PA returned message and stated to do unna boots to bilateral legs and change them every 3 days.
ee. On 1/7/20 at 10:25 PM, .Edema LLE (left lower extremity) +3, LRE (lower right extremity) +2.
On 1/7/20 at approximately 4:50 PM, an interview was conducted with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 2. LPN 2 stated that resident 43 had 1+ edema in left leg and no edema in her right leg last week when she worked. LPN 2 stated resident 43 had been up since 2:30 AM that morning and was refusing to lay down. LPN 2 stated that was why resident 43 was having weeping edema from her right leg. LPN 2 stated that resident 43 did not have orders for ted hose and was currently texting the doctor for an order for unna boots to push the fluid back up. LPN 2 stated that resident 43 was administered lasix 40 milligrams every morning. LPN 2 stated she would try to put resident 43 in her recliner daily but resident 43 refused to be in the recliner for more than an hour, before she asked to be put back in her wheelchair.
On 1/8/20 at 8:15 AM, an observation was made of resident 43. Resident 43 was observed to have wraps on her legs.
On 1/8/20 at 11:26 AM, an interview was conducted with LPN 1. LPN 1 stated that residents were assessed for edema upon admission. LPN 1 stated if a resident was on diuretics or had edema the resident had their edema monitored twice daily. LPN 1 stated that resident 43's legs had been weeping for probably over a week. LPN 1 stated that the PA visited resident 43 regarding her legs about a week ago. LPN 1 stated that she went in with the PA and he said to keep resident 43's legs elevated. LPN 1 stated there were no orders to wrap or use ted hose or anything else to prevent edema. LPN 1 stated that the physician gave orders for unna wraps yesterday because resident 43's legs were weeping.
On 1/8/20 at 2:58 PM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON stated that if a resident was to have compression stockings or ted hose the physician wrote an order. The DON stated that the nurse told her yesterday that she was going to try and get some unna boots or tubigrips ordered for resident 43. The DON stated that there was not a physician's order for the compression stockings in resident 43's electronic medical record. The DON stated if resident 43 refused to wear compression stockings it would be documented in the Treatment Administration Record (TAR). The DON stated there was no documentation in the TAR. The DON stated the compression stockings order was not entered into the electronic medical record.
2. Resident 46 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included hypertension, vascular dementia with behavioral disturbance, falls, and altered mental status.
On 1/6/20 at 11:43 AM, an observation was made of resident 46. Resident 46 was observed in the main dining. Resident 46's eyes were observed to be red with discharge. Resident 46 was observed to rub his eyes during dining.
On 1/9/20 at 10:40 AM, an observation was made of resident 46. Resident 46 was observed to have red eye lids with a creamy discharge on his eyes. Resident 46 was observed in bed with a blanket over his face. Resident 46 was asked if his eyes hurt. Resident 46's speech was unclear.
On 1/9/20 at 10:45 AM, an interview was conducted with CNA 4. CNA 4 stated that resident 46 would not allow staff to clean out his eyes. CNA 4 stated that resident 46 had become combative in the past. CNA 4 stated that she provided resident 46 a warm wet wash cloth to put on his eyes to clean his eyes but he did not allow her to wash out the creamy discharge. CNA 4 stated that resident 46's eyes were red and swollen with a creamy discharge for a while. CNA 4 stated that resident 46 expressed his eyes hurt at times.
On 1/9/20 at 11:48 AM, a follow up interview was conducted with CNA 4. CNA 4 stated that resident 46 always had red eyes. CNA 4 stated that resident 46's eyes usually had a creamy discharge.
Resident 46's medical record was reviewed on 1/8/20.
Resident 46's PA note dated 12/23/19, revealed that resident 46 had a diagnosis of hyperemic bilateral conjunctiva. There was no follow up information or treatment documented.
On 1/9/20 at 11:25 AM, an interview was conducted with the DON. The DON stated that the bottom lid of resident 46's eyes were chronically red. The DON stated that she had been alerted that resident 46's eyes needed to be looked at. The DON stated that it was reported in a progress note that resident 46's eyes were swollen. The DON was observed to look at resident 46's eyes and stated to LPN 1 that resident 46 might need an antibiotic. LPN 1 stated that resident 46's eyes were more boogery that morning.
On 1/9/20 at 11:50 AM, the DON stated that she was informed by the Administrative Assistant about resident 46's eyes last night. The DON stated there was not a nurses note. The DON stated that the Administrative Assistant noticed that resident 46's eyes were red and swollen. The DON stated she had it on her list to look at resident 46's eyes and had not had time.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined, for 1 of 22 sample residents, that the facility did not en...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined, for 1 of 22 sample residents, that the facility did not ensure the resident's environment remained as free of accident hazards as was possible and each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents. Specifically, a resident was transferred via the Hoyer Lift by one staff member instead of two. Resident identifier: 8.
Findings include:
Resident 8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included morbid obesity, polyneuropathy, hypoxemia, heart failure, and chronic kidney disease.
On 1/6/20 at 11:45 AM, an interview was conducted with resident 8. Resident 8 stated she was dependent on staff to transfer her from her bed to her wheelchair or recliner. Resident 8 stated, Staff almost always transfer me with the Hoyer Lift and usually with just one CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant).
Resident 8's medical record was reviewed on 1/6/20.
A Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], documented resident 8 as Extensive assistance under self-performance transfers and a Two+ persons physical assist for support transfers.
A care plan for resident 8 dated 2/12/19, revealed a focus area of Has had an actual fall - actual fall during transfer 11/8/19. The goal developed was, [Resident 8] will resume usual activities without any untreated pain or injury. The following interventions were developed:
a. Encourage [resident 8] to allow staff to use lift for transfers, educate staff to use 2 person manual transfers or lift with 2 persons for transfers if not using lift. If therapy is available, ask for assistance from them also - 1/07/19.
b. Use Hoyer lift for transfers at this time until mobility and strength increase - 7/3/19.
Resident 8's nursing progress notes revealed the following entries:
a. On 11/5/2019 at 2:45 PM, CNA was transferring [resident 8] from her motorized w/c (wheel chair) to her recliner when [resident 8's] leg gave out. CNA assisted [resident 8] to the floor. No injuries noted. Will monitor.
b. On 11/9/19 at 10:05 PM, Resident has had no apparent injuries or increased pain from falling to the ground during transfer.
c. On 11/18/19 at 9:08 PM, She requires 2 assist and mechanical lift for transfers.
On 1/8/20 at 8:58 AM, CNA 5 was observed transferring resident 8 from a shower chair into her recliner using the Hoyer Lift by herself. CNA 5 was immediately asked who trained her to use the lift. CNA 5 stated, There was a lady from [corporate name] who came down and showed me how to use the lift. She also certified me too. CNA 5 was then asked if she operates the Hoyer Lift by herself or if she was required to use two CNAs to transfer residents. CNA 5 stated, A lot of the times it's easier if I just do it. I can pretty much do it all by myself.
On 1/8/20 at 12:24 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was interviewed. The DON stated, The current CNAs train the new CNAs on the lift. They know who's a 1-person vs 2-person based on care plans but the amount of help needed changes day to day so a CNA could ask for help if they needed. The Hoyer lift, we consider it a two person. It might be possible to use it 1-person but I want them to have 2 people whenever they use it.
On 1/9/20 at 8:17 AM, resident 8 was found sitting in her recliner. When asked how she transferred from her bed to the chair, resident 8 stated, [CNA 6] transferred me by herself in the Hoyer Lift this morning. She got me from my bed to my recliner.
On 1/9/20 at 8:34 AM, CNA 6 was interviewed regarding the Hoyer Lift. CNA 6 stated, A girl that doesn't work here anymore trained me on transfers and the Hoyer lift. The resident will tell me if they're a 1-person or 2-person assist. CNA 6 was then asked if she operates the Hoyer Lift by herself or if she was required to use two CNAs to transfer residents. CNA 6 stated, The Hoyer can be one person, but sometimes we use two CNAs. When asked if she operated it by herself this morning with resident 8 CNA 6 stated, I just used it myself.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Tube Feeding
(Tag F0693)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined, for 1 of 22 sample residents, that the facility did not en...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined, for 1 of 22 sample residents, that the facility did not ensure that a resident who was fed by enteral means received the appropriate treatment and services to prevent complications of the enteral feeding. Specifically, a resident was given incorrect amounts of water during administration of enteral feeds. Resident identifier: 48.
Findings include:
Resident 48 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included type 2 diabetes, major depressive disorder, dysphagia, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Resident 48's medical record was reviewed on 1/6/20.
Resident 48 had the following physician's orders for the tube feed:
a. On 7/16/19, Four times a day .300 ml (milliliter) bolus feed. Admin (administer) at 0800 am, 1100 am, 1400 PM (2:00 PM), 5-5:30 PM and 1900 (7:00 PM) per [resident 48] request. Provides 360 kcal (kilocalorie),18 g (grams) protein, and 245 ml free water per bolus feed. Provides a total of 1800 kcal, 95 g protein, and 1225 ml free water.
b. On 7/16/19, Every 4 hours Flush PEG (percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy) tube with 130 ml of H20 (water) every 4 hours. For a total of 780 ml H2O/day.
c. On 7/16/19, Every night shift, Enteral Nutrition via Pump-Diabetisource AC at 40 ml per hour for 8 hours via pump per PEG tube. Start infusion at 10 pm and continue until 6 am. To provide 384 kcal, 19 g protein, and 262 ml free water.
On 1/6/20 at 11:31 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 1 was observed administering a scheduled bolus of formula to resident 48. LPN 1 was asked how much formula and how much water was administered. LPN 1 stated, 300 ml of formula. Right now isn't considered a flush time, but I always flush the formula with around 60 milliliters but right now I'm doing 120 milliliters because it was a little clogged this morning. It was observed that resident 48 received 120 ml water with the scheduled 11:00 AM bolus feed. [Note: Resident 48 should have received 245 ml water.]
On 1/7/20 at 5:08 PM, Registered Nurse (RN) 1 was observed administering a scheduled bolus of formula to resident 48. RN 1 was asked how much formula and how much water was administered. RN 1 stated, 300 formula, 180 or 280 water, I can't remember. We do 180 every 4 hours. Plus I mixed a little water in the formula, it seems to go down easier. [Note: Resident 48 should have received 245 ml water.]
On 1/8/20 at 1:09 PM, the Registered Dietician (RD) was interviewed. The RD stated, For [resident 48's] total daily water, we want 2267 ml total. That includes his free flush and his formula feed. We don't count his med pass. [Note: A 300 ml bolus feed with 245 ml water, four times a day gives 1225 ml water. A 130 ml water flush every 4 hours gives 780 ml water. The overnight feed gives 262 ml water. This is a total of 2,267 ml water resident 48 should receive daily.]
On 1/8/20 at 2:13 PM, RN 1 was observed administering a scheduled bolus feed and scheduled flush to resident 48. RN 1 stated, I'm giving 300 ml formula and I flush the tube before and after the formula. Since he needs a scheduled flush I'll do that too. RN 1 was asked how much water resident 48 was receiving. RN 1 stated, I'm giving him the scheduled 130 ml. Plus, I flush about 50 cc (cubic centimeters) before and after the formula. RN 1 was then asked if resident 48 received any water with his bolus feed. RN 1 stated, Just my 50 cc flush before and after. It was observed that resident 48 received an estimated 100 ml water with the scheduled 2:00 PM bolus feed. [Note: Resident 48 should have received 245 ml water.]
On 1/9/20 at 9:08 AM, RN 1 was observed administering a scheduled bolus feed to resident 48. RN 1 stated she was administering 300 ml of formula for a schedule bolus feed. After the formula had been administered, RN 1 was observed pouring approximately three quarters of a 207 ml cup of water into the feeding tube. When asked how much water she was adding RN 1 stated, I always like to flush it before and after with about 50 cc's of water. [Note: Resident 48 should have received 245 ml of water.]
On 1/9/20 at 10:50 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was interviewed. The DON was shown resident 48's bolus feed order. The DON was then asked how much water was to be given with the scheduled 300 ml bolus feed. The DON stated, You do the 300 ml then you do the 245 ml water. The DON was then asked why the nursing staff were giving less water than was ordered. The DON stated, When we give the water it is with the meds, that's probably why nurses didn't give that 245 ml. So, a lot of the daily water comes from the med pass.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined, for 2 of 22 sample residents, that the facility did not en...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined, for 2 of 22 sample residents, that the facility did not ensure that residents who need respiratory care are provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive person-centered care plan. Specifically, the humidifier bottles attached to two resident's oxygen concentrators were empty for the duration of the survey. Resident identifiers: 22 and 48.
Findings include:
1. Resident 22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart failure, type 2 diabetes, and unspecified atrial fibrillation.
Resident 22's medical record was reviewed on 1/7/20.
Resident 22's care plan revealed the following focus and goal:
a. Focus. [resident 22] has dehydration or potential fluid deficit r/t (related to) diuretic use. Date initiated 1/17/18.
b. Goal. [resident 22] will be free of symptoms of dehydration and maintain moist mucas (sic) membranes, good skin turgor. Date initiated 1/17/18.
The humidifier bottle attached to resident 22's oxygen concentrator was observed empty on the following dates and times:
a. 1/6/20 at 11:04 AM.
b. 1/7/20 at 5:15 PM.
c. 1/8/20 at 11:25 AM.
d. 1/9/20 at 8:46 AM.
On 1/8/20 at 4:13 PM, resident 22 was interviewed. When asked about the empty humidifier bottle resident 22 stated, It makes my nose really dry, it bothers me. The nurses are supposed to refill that water bottle but they don't. It's probably been empty a couple weeks. When asked what he does for his dry nose resident 22 stated, I rub lip balm up inside my nose to keep it from getting so dry.
2. Resident 48 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included type 2 diabetes, major depressive disorder, dysphagia, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Resident 48's medical record was reviewed on 1/6/20.
Resident 48's care plan revealed the following focus and goal:
a. Focus. [resident 48] has dehydration or potential fluid deficit. Date initiated 6/21/18.
b. Goal. [resident 48] will be free of symptoms of dehydration and maintain moist mucous membranes, good skin turgor. Date initiated 6/21/18.
Resident 48's medical record contained the following physician's order dated 9/26/19, Clean, Rinse and Refill O2 (oxygen) humidifier bottle QHS (every night).
The humidifier bottle attached to resident 48's oxygen concentrator was observed empty on the following dates and times:
a. 1/6/20 at 2:40 PM.
b. 1/8/20 at 11:25 AM.
c. 1/9/20 at 8:14 AM.
On 1/9/20 at 9:01 AM, resident 48 was interviewed. When asked if his nose was dry, resident 48 nodded and said yes. RN 1 was in the room at the time and this surveyor immediately asked the RN to verify what resident 48 had just said as he can be difficult to understand at times. RN 1 stated, He said his nose is dry.
On 1/8/20 at 11:30 AM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 5 was interviewed. CNA 5 was asked who takes care of the oxygen concentrators as far as replacing tubing, cleaning, and refilling the humidifier bottles. CNA 5 stated, Night shift is in charge of changing the oxygen tubing. Anyone can refill the water bottle if it looks low.
On 1/8/20 at 11:56 AM, CNA 1 was interviewed. CNA 1 stated, The concentrators are something night shift is scheduled to check. If water is low anyone can fill them up with distilled water from the nurses station.
On 1/9/20 at 8:28 AM, Registered Nurse (RN) 1 was interviewed. RN 1 stated, The oxygen concentrators are assigned to the graveyard CNAs, but the night shift nurse is responsible to see it gets done.
On 1/9/20 at 9:13 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was interviewed. The DON was asked who was assigned to take care of the oxygen concentrators. The DON stated, The night aids do it but the nurses make sure it's done. The DON was then asked what might happen to a resident if the humidifier bottle was left dry. The DON stated, If the water bottle is empty it can dry out their nose.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Drug Regimen Review
(Tag F0756)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 22 sample residents, that the irregularities noted by the pharm...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 1 of 22 sample residents, that the irregularities noted by the pharmacist during the drug regimen review were not reported to the attending physician and the facility's Medical Director (MD), nor were the reports acted upon. Specifically, a separate Consultation Report was not completed for a resident. In addition, the attending physician and facility MD did not document in the resident's medical record that the identified irregularities had been reviewed and what action had been taken to address the irregularities. Resident identifier: 17.
Findings include:
Resident 17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included wedge compression fracture, diabetes mellitus type 2, hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pain in unspecified joint, repeated falls, opioid dependence, low back pain, extended spectrum beta-lactamases, history of falling, major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, and panic disorder.
Resident 17's medical record was reviewed on 1/7/20.
A review of the monthly Consultation Reports completed by the Pharmacist documented the following:
a. A Consultation Report completed by the Pharmacist dated 8/22/19, documented that resident 17 received vitamin D 5000 units a day. A recommendation was made by the Pharmacist to monitor a 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration on the next convenient lab day and adjust the vitamin D accordingly.
No documentation was located that the attending physician or the facility MD agreed or disagreed with the Pharmacist recommendations.
The signature line on the Consultation Report for the physician documented T-O (telephone order) received 8/26/19 - will draw 8/27/19. [Note: The physician had not signed the report.]
b. A Consultation Report completed by the Pharmacist dated 8/22/19, documented that resident 17 receives lisinopril. A recommendation was made by the Pharmacist to obtain a Basic Metabolic Panel on the next convenient lab day and every 6 months thereafter.
No documentation was located that the attending physician or the facility MD agreed or disagreed with the Pharmacist recommendations.
The signature line on the Consultation Report for the physician documented via phone. [Note: The physician had not signed the report.]
c. A Consultation Report completed by the Pharmacist dated 9/18/19, documented that resident 17 had diabetes, but an A1C (A blood test for type 2 diabetes that measures your average blood glucose level over the past 3 months.) was not available in the medical record in the past 6 months. A recommendation was made by the Pharmacist to monitor an A1C on the next convenient lab day and every 6 months if meeting treatment goals, or every 3 months if therapy had changed or goals were not being met.
The box on the Consultation Report was marked that the physician accepted the Pharmacist recommendation on 9/18/19. The Physician's Response documented on the Consultation Report was to check an A1C prior to discharge this month.
The signature line on the Consultation Report for the physician documented via phone and was dated 9/24/19. [Note: The physician had not signed the report.]
d. A Consultation Report completed by the Pharmacist dated 10/16/19, documented that resident 17 received a high dose of atorvastatin 80 milligrams a day. A recommendation was made by the Pharmacist to monitor a fasting lipid panel on the next convenient lab day and every 12 months thereafter.
No documentation was located in resident 17's medical record indicating that the attending physician or the facility MD agreed or disagreed with the Pharmacist recommendations.
A Nursing Note dated 10/29/19 at 3:03 PM, documented Pharmacy Consultant had recommended to check a lipid panel annually d/t (due to) Atorvastatin therapy. MD notified, order received today to check with next lab draw in November and then annually. [Resident 17] aware.
On 1/8/20 at 9:30 AM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON stated that the Pharmacist would review all the facility residents medications monthly. The DON stated that the reports were emailed to her by the Pharmacist when they were completed and she would print the reports. The DON stated that she would review the nursing only recommendations with the Assistant Director of Nursing and Unit Managers. The DON stated that when the MD was in the building she would have a meeting with everyone and the recommendations were reviewed. The DON stated that the MD would document his recommendations on the Consultation Reports, the MD would sign the Consultation Reports, and the reports were scanned into the resident medical record. The DON stated that the facility had laboratory protocols and the Pharmacist was aware of what the protocols were. The DON stated that the MD probably did not need to sign the recommendations because they were for laboratory draws. The DON stated that the staff probably received a verbal from the MD to order the laboratory draws. The DON stated that the Pharmacist recommendations were probably to remind the staff of the facility protocols.
On 1/8/20 at 10:31 AM, a follow up interview was conducted with the DON. The DON stated that a verbal confirmation was received from the attending Physician for the October Pharmacist recommendation but the Unit Manager forgot to document the verbal confirmation on the Consultation Report. The DON stated that the Unit Manager had made a progress note documenting the phone call to the attending Physician. The DON stated that the attending Physician would not send back the Consultation Reports if she sent them to him to review.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. Resident 22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included chronic obstructive...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. Resident 22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart failure, type 2 diabetes, and unspecified atrial fibrillation.
Resident 22's medical record was reviewed on 1/7/20.
A review of the physician's orders revealed an order dated 12/20/19, for Lorazepam tablet 1 mg one time a day as needed for anxiety. The end date for the order was listed as indefinite.
On 1/8/20 at 4:29 PM, the DON was interviewed. The DON stated, For a medication like Ativan (Lorazepam), we try a trial of like 14 days. Usually we end it after 14 days. We keep an eye on dates. When shown the order for resident 22's Lorazepam the DON stated, That order got entered in wrong. That order should have had an end date after 60 days, not indefinite.
Based on interview and record review it was determined, for 2 of 22 sample residents, that the facility did not ensure that a resident who used psychotropic drugs was not given these drugs unless the medication was necessary to treat a specific condition as diagnosed and documented in the clinical record. Additionally, as needed (PRN) orders for psychotropic drugs are limited to 14 days, unless the attending physician or prescribing practitioner believed that it was appropriate for the PRN order to be extended beyond 14 days, and should document their rationale in the resident's medical record and indicate the duration for the PRN order. Specifically, a resident was given PRN psychotropic medications beyond 14 days without documented rationale for continuing the PRN orders and a resident was prescribed an antipsychotic medication for insomnia. Resident identifiers: 17 and 22.
Findings include:
1. Resident 17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included wedge compression fracture, diabetes mellitus type 2, hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pain in unspecified joint, repeated falls, opioid dependence, low back pain, extended spectrum beta-lactamases, history of falling, major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, and panic disorder.
Resident 17's medical record was reviewed on 1/7/20.
Physician's orders revealed the following:
a. On 12/10/19, Seroquel 50 milligrams (mg). Give 1 tablet at bedtime related to panic disorder. The order was discontinued on 1/6/20.
b. On 1/6/20, Seroquel 150 mg. Give 1 tablet at bedtime related to panic disorder.
A Nursing Progress Note dated 11/20/19 at 2:53 PM revealed, Resident is alert and oriented times 3. It was reported to nurse that resident had fallen asleep outside and and (sic) accidentally dropped part of her cigarette on her socks catching her sock on fire. Nurse checked resident's foot and noted that she had several pairs of socks on.
A Nursing Progress Note dated 11/26/19 at 2:34 PM revealed, Psychotropic committee met last week and recommended to decrease Seroquel d/t (due to) [Resident 17] being sleepy during the day and then not sleeping at night. MD (Medical Doctor) was notified, office called back today and order received to decrease to 12.5 mg po (by mouth) qam (every morning) and 25 mg po qhs (every at bed time). [Resident 17] aware. Will monitor for any changes in behaviors.
A Nursing Progress Note dated 12/3/19 at 4:18 PM revealed, [Resident 17] approached me this morning tearful and stated she was having increased anxiety and felt like she was 'crawling out of her skin' since reduction of Seroquel. [MD] notified and order received to increase am dose to 25 mg to see if any improvement. [Resident 17] aware.
A Nursing Progress Note dated 12/6/19 at 4:25 PM revealed, [MD] in to visit. Residents main complaints was not sleeping during the night but short naps day and night. and also pain (sic). he gave order to start Seroquel 150 mg ER (extended release) tab every hs (at bed time) and wants to continue the 25 mg every morning. he also ordered to start Diclofenac 50mg bid (twice daily).
A Nursing Progress Note dated 12/10/19 at 2:27 PM revealed, [Resident 17] presented this am very sedate. Night shift also reported that when she was 'awake' she was very drowsy last night as well. I spoke with [resident 17] this am about the increase in her Seroquel and the side effects of drowsiness that it may cause. She voiced concern that she felt so tired but couldn't sleep last night. I ensured her I would notify her MD. [MD] notified and order received to DC (discontinue) am dose of Seroquel 25 mg and decrease hs dose to Seroquel XR (extended release) 50mg po qhs. [Resident 17] aware. Will continue to monitor for side effects and effectiveness of decreased dose.
A Nursing Progress Note dated 12/11/19 at 2:11 AM revealed, Alert: Res (resident) was found on the floor by the CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant), res was laying on her back under the extra bed in her room after having fallen from her wheel chair because she fell asleep.
A Nursing Progress Note dated 12/18/19 at 10:48 AM revealed, Resident is alert and orientated times 3. she propels self in w/c (wheel chair). resident has bad days where she will fall asleep frequently, at times propelling self and only making it a few feet before falling a sleep and then will wake and go a bit further then fall asleep. she does this all the time and when staff say her name she naps (sic) up and states i wasn't asleep even though she clearly was.
A Nursing Progress Note dated 12/23/19 at 3:59 PM revealed, Discussed with administrator and unit manager concerning resident's desire to smoke without supervision., we will assess compliance as well as resident's ability to stay awake while she is in the smoking area.
A Nursing Progress Note dated 1/1/20 at 12:35 PM revealed, . Has had a hard time staying awake this past week. She does not feel that it is any of her meds making her sleepy.
A Nursing Progress Note dated 1/6/20 at 5:35 PM revealed, [MD] in to visit. he ordered to increase her seroquel to 150mg every hs d/t resident is up most of the night and only sleeps for very short intervals.
A Nursing Progress Note dated 1/7/20 at 3:13 PM revealed, Resident stated that she was feeling sleepy today, possibly due to her increase in Seroquel last night. Resident asked to be supervised while smoking around 2 pm this afternoon.
A Nursing Progress Note dated 1/7/20 at 5:26 PM revealed, Resident's primary care physician came into the facility last night and gave an order to increase resident's Seroquel to 150 mg qhs beginning 1/6/2020. When the doctor's note was reviewed he indicated that the medication was increased to 100 mg qhs. Attempted to contact prescribing doctor for clarification. Primary care physician will not be available until 1/9/2020. Facility Medical Director contacted and order given to decrease the Seroquel to 100 mg qhs.
A Nursing Progress Note dated 1/8/20 at 2:27 AM revealed, V.S. (vital signs) 97.0 (temperature) 83 (pulse) 20 (respirations) 148/83 (blood pressure) There have been no side effects noted from med (medication) change from sequel 150 mg decreased to 100 mg. will monitor
A Nursing Progress Note dated 1/8/20 at 7:11 AM revealed, [Resident 17] states that she slept ok last night in the recliner in her room. She says that she doesn't feel as groggy this am. She is more
alert this am than she was yesterday.
A review of the Monitors documented the following:
a. October 2019, resident 17 was being monitored for behaviors of verbal sadness, crying/tearful, afraid/panic, angry, screaming/yelling, danger to self, danger to others, hallucinations, and delusions. Resident 17 had not exhibited any behaviors.
b. November 2019, resident 17 was being monitored for behaviors of verbal sadness, crying/tearful, afraid/panic, angry, screaming/yelling, danger to self, danger to others, hallucinations, and delusions. Resident 17 had not exhibited any behaviors.
c. December 2019, resident 17 was being monitored for behaviors of verbal sadness, crying/tearful, afraid/panic, and angry. Resident 17 had 4 episodes of anger documented.
d. January 2020, resident 17 was being monitored for behaviors of verbal sadness, crying/tearful, afraid/panic, and angry. Resident 17 had not exhibited any behaviors.
[Note: Resident 17's hours of sleep were not being monitored.]
A History and Physical report dated 1/5/20, was completed by resident 17's physician. The physician documented Insomnia Increase Seroquel to 100 mg nightly. Additionally, She does have a history of insomnia, this is complicated by her pain. She was switched to Seroquel 25 mg nightly, this has helped slightly. But she continues to struggle with the insomnia. We discussed potentially increasing the cervical (sic), she does have anxiety and states that throughout the day she feels like she is jittery and shaky. However when she had been on Seroquel with a dose in the morning, she had become very tired and somnolent and was causing patient to be excessively fatigued and sleepy. [Note: A Nursing Progress Note documented that the MD was in to visit resident 17 on 1/6/20 at 5:35 PM.]
On 1/7/20 at 12:35 PM, an interview was conducted with resident 17. Resident 17 stated that she was on Seroquel for depression. Registered Nurse (RN) 1 walked into resident 17's room during the interview. Resident 17 asked RN 1 why she was on the Seroquel. RN 1 stated that resident 17 was complaining the other day of not sleeping at night. Resident 17 stated that she was groggy today because the increase of the Seroquel happened last night.
On 1/7/20 at 2:38 PM, an interview was conducted with RN 1. RN 1 stated that resident 17 did not have any behaviors. RN 1 referred to resident 17's Medication Administration Record (MAR) and stated that resident 17's behaviors tracked were afraid, panic, angry, and verbal sadness. RN 1 stated that resident 17's behaviors were charted in the monitors on the MAR. RN 1 stated that if the resident behavior was significant she would chart the behavior in a nurses note. RN 1 stated that after we spoke earlier in resident 17's room she had to look up why resident 17 was on Seroquel. RN 1 stated that resident 17 was on Seroquel for anxiety and panic disorder. RN 1 stated that the MD increased the Seroquel for sleep yesterday. RN 1 stated that resident 17 laid down for an hour and then she was back up outside smoking. RN 1 stated that resident 17 did not sleep well and resident 17 would sleep on her couch when she was at home.
On 1/7/20 at 4:43 PM, an interview was conducted with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 2. LPN 2 stated that she had verified with the doctor prior to the Seroquel dose increase because resident 17 was snowed the last time she had 150 mg of Seroquel. LPN 2 stated that the MD wanted resident 17 to be able to sleep. LPN 2 stated that the MD wanted resident 17 knocked out cold at night. LPN 2 stated that she had suggested 100 mg of Seroquel but the MD wanted 150 mg. LPN 2 stated that she was nervous about the increase. LPN 2 stated that she had tried getting resident 17 to eat a snack to help her sleep. LPN 2 stated that when resident 17 was at home she would sit in her recliner and just smoke at night. LPN 2 stated that the Seroquel did not knock resident 17 out. LPN 2 stated that the Seroquel would make resident 17 drowsy during the day time. LPN 2 stated that resident 17 usually would sleep in her wheelchair at the nurses station. LPN 2 stated that resident 17 would refuse to go to her room at night and sleep in the bed. LPN 2 stated that resident 17 was anxiousness but she did not have behaviors. LPN 2 stated that resident 17 would have delusions upon waking up from dreams.
On 1/7/20 at 5:00 PM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON stated that she was trying to verify the Seroquel order with resident 17's physician. The DON stated that resident 17's physician ordered the Seroquel be increased yesterday to 150 mg. The DON stated that she received the dictated physician note today and it was documented that the Seroquel be increased to 100 mg not 150 mg. The DON stated that resident 17's physician was unavailable today so she had called the facility MD. The DON stated that the facility MD ordered to decrease the Seroquel to 100 mg. The DON stated that it made more sense to increase the Seroquel to 100 mg, instead of the 150 mg per the facility MD. The DON stated that resident 17 had received 150 mg of Seroquel last evening.
On 1/7/20 at 5:55 PM, an interview was conducted with LPN 3. LPN 3 stated that he was present with LPN 2 when resident 17's physician came to the building at the change of shift. LPN 3 stated that the physician had visited with resident 17 and ordered to increase the Seroquel to 150 mg because resident 17 had been having trouble sleeping. LPN 3 stated that resident 17 had been on Seroquel 150 mg prior and it had helped with resident 17's sleep. LPN 3 stated that the physician had ordered to increase resident 17 back to the 150 mg dose of Seroquel. LPN 3 stated that resident 17 was not sleeping because she refused to lay down and would sleep in her wheel chair. LPN 3 stated that resident 17 would fall asleep at the nurses station with her head resting on the desk. LPN 3 stated that resident 17 would get agitated with him and would not listen to suggestions. LPN 3 stated that he would try and space out resident 17's pain medications so resident 17 was not snowed. LPN 3 stated that resident 17 was taking the Seroquel for sleep.
On 1/9/20 at 10:04 AM, a follow up interview was conducted with the DON. The DON stated the Unit Manager had spoke to resident 17's physician about not using Seroquel for sleep. The DON stated that the staff have used nonpharmalogical approaches with resident 17. The DON stated that when a resident was using an antipsychotic medication without adequate rationale she tried to decrease the dose and talk with the facility MD about the diagnoses for the medication. The DON stated that she tried her best to decrease the dose and make suggestions.
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 3. Resident 45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia without behavioral disturbance, chr...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 3. Resident 45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia without behavioral disturbance, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, acute kidney failure, atherosclerotic heart disease, peripheral vascular disease, mood disorder, and muscle weakness.
On 1/6/20 at 11:40 AM, resident 45 was observed sitting in a wheel chair with bilateral heel protectors.
Resident 45's medical record was reviewed on 1/8/20.
A Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk dated 9/10/19, documented that resident 45 was at risk for pressure sores with a score of 18. [Note: A resident at mild risk for pressure ulcers would have a total score of 15 to 18.]
A Care Plan focus initiated on 9/10/19, documented [Resident 45] has potential for impairment to skin integrity. The goal developed was [Resident 45] will maintain or develop clean and intact skin by the review date. The following interventions were developed:
a. Avoid scratching and keep hands and body parts from excessive moisture. Keep fingernails short.
b. Educate resident 45, family, and caregivers of causative factors and measures to prevent skin injury.
c. Encourage good nutrition and hydration in order to promote healthier skin.
d. Identify and document potential causative factors and eliminate and resolve where possible.
e. Keep skin clean and dry. Use lotion on dry skin.
An admission MDS assessment dated [DATE], documented that resident 45 was at risk of developing pressure ulcers. The MDS further documented that resident 45 had a pressure reducing device for chair and bed. The Care Area Assessment section of the MDS documented that Pressure Ulcer was a triggered care area and was addressed in the care plan. [Note: The skin integrity care plan initiated for resident 45 did not include interventions to prevent pressure ulcers including the pressure reducing device for the chair and bed.]
A Nursing Progress Note dated 12/2/19 at 3:05 PM, documented Resident has a blister on each heel. New order to keep heels floated while in bed. Apply skin prep to heels BID.
A Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk dated 12/3/19, documented that resident 45 was at risk for pressure sores with a score of 16. [Note: A resident at mild risk for pressure ulcers would have a total score of 15 to 18.]
A Care Plan focus initiated on 12/3/19, documented [Resident 45] has a pressure ulcer (R heel). Additionally, a Care Plan focus initiated on 12/3/19, documented [Resident 45] has a pressure ulcer (L heel). The goal initiated was [Resident 45's] pressure ulcer will show signs of healing and remain free from infection by/through review date. The following interventions were developed for both of the initiated Care Plan focuses:
a. Administer medications as ordered. Monitor and document for side effects and effectiveness.
b. Administer treatments as ordered and monitor for effectiveness.
c. Assess, record, and monitor wound healing. Measure length, width and depth where possible. Assess and document status of wound perimeter, wound bed and healing progress. Report improvements and declines to the MD.
d. Follow facility policies and protocols for the prevention and treatment of skin breakdown.
e. Weekly treatment documentation to include measurement of each area of skin breakdown's width, length, depth, type of tissue, and exudate.
[Note: The pressure ulcer care plan initiated for resident 45 did not include interventions that had been implemented to treat and prevent pressure ulcers including heel protectors and the pressure reducing device for the chair and bed.]
On 1/8/20 at 3:38 PM, resident 45 was observed with heel protectors on both heels. Resident 45's room was observed and resident 45's bed had a standard facility bed mattress.
On 1/9/20 at 12:30 PM, an interview was conducted with the DON. The DON stated that the MDS coordinator updated care plans. The DON stated that when an evaluation was completed in a resident's medical record, the care plans were automatically created based on the evaluation. The DON stated that all nurses were able to personalize care plans.
Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined, for 3 of 22 sample residents, that the facility did not develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, that included measurable objectives and timeframe's to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment. Specifically, resident's did not have care plans with individualized interventions for pressure ulcers and edema. Resident identifiers: 21, 43, and 45.
Findings include:
1. Resident 21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included gangrene, urinary tract infection, hypotension, major depressive disorder, psychosis, obsessive-compulsive disorder, sepsis, and dehydration.
On 1/6/20 at 2:50 PM, an interview and observation was conducted of resident 21. Resident 21 stated that she had a wound on her backside that was almost healed. Resident 21 stated that she was vegetarian. Resident 21 was observed to be sitting in a high back wheelchair in her room. Resident 21 was observed to have a regular facility mattress.
The facility matrix revealed that resident 21 had a stage 2 pressure ulcer on her buttocks.
Resident 21's medical record was reviewed on 1/8/20.
An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed that resident 21 was admitted with a stage 2 pressure ulcer. The MDS further revealed that resident 21 had a pressure relieving device to chair and bed, pressure ulcer care, and ointment or medications were applied.
A care plan dated 10/23/19 and revised on 10/25/19, revealed [Resident 21] has potential for impairment to skin integrity. [Resident 21] has a wound to her coccyx and surgical wounds to bilat (bilateral) great toes. The goal developed was [Resident 21] will maintain or develop clean and intact skin by the review date. The interventions developed were, [Resident 21] will not sustain thermal burn injury related to hot beverage consumption through the next review. Avoid scratching and keep hands and body parts from excessive moisture. Keep fingernails short. Educate [resident 21] /family/caregivers of causative factors and measures to prevent skin injury. Encourage good nutrition and hydration in order to promote healthier skin. Identify/document potential causative factors and eliminate/resolve where possible. Keep skin clean and dry. Use lotion on dry skin as needed. Use caution during transfers and bed mobility to prevent striking arms, legs, and hands against any sharp or hard surface. [Note: There were no interventions developed for the treatments, dietary concerns because resident 21 was a vegetarian, or a cushion in resident 21's wheelchair.]
A Dietary Screen dated 10/26/19, revealed that resident 21's most current weight was 157.8 pounds which was taken from 12/4/18. The Registered Dietician (RD) documented PO (oral) intake is varied with an average of 50-75% of meals. Pressure wound to right buttock, surgical incisions to right and left 1st toes. Recommend adding multivitamin/mineral and vitamin C to aid in wound healing. Protein status is WNL (within normal limits), Alb (albumin) 4.0. The care plan goals on the form were [Resident 21] will maintain adequate nutritional status as evidenced by maintaining or gradually losing weight, no s/sx (signs or symptoms) of malnutrition through review date. A care plan on the form reveled a Focus of The resident has nutritional problem or potential nutritional problem. The interventions developed were Administer medications as ordered. Monitor/Document for side effects and effectiveness. Provide, serve diet as ordered. Monitor intake and record q (every) meal. RD to evaluate and make diet change recommendations PRN (as needed). weight per facility protocol. [Note: The resident 21's calories and protein needs were not calculated on the Dietary Screen.]
A wound evaluation dated 10/27/19, revealed that resident 21 had a stage 2 pressure ulcer to the right buttock. The measurements were 5.33 centimeters squared of the area, the length was 2.45 centimeters (cm), and the width was 2.84 cm.
A nursing progress note on 10/29/19 at 3:11 PM, revealed RD at facility and reviewed chart d/t (due to) new admit. Recommended MVI (multi vitamin) with minerals 1 po qday (every day) and Vitamin C 500mg (milligrams) po BID (twice daily) to promote wound healing. MD (Medical Doctor) notified and order received, [name removed] aware. Weight is stable at this time. Will monitor po intake, skin and weight weekly.
A progress note dated 12/10/19 at 1:16 PM, WCC (wound care consultant) wound nurse reviewed resident's wounds yesterday 12/09/19. He felt that the treatment was appropriate and asked that we continue to encourage the resident to let us re-position her more often. Resident likes to lay in bed on her back all day and all night. She gets up for at least 2 meals most days. Unable to re-position herself in bed or wheelchair. [Note: There was no intervention regarding repositioning resident 17 on the care plan.]
On 1/9/20 at 12:30 PM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON stated that the MDS coordinator updated care plans. The DON stated that when an evaluation was completed in a resident's electronic medical record, the care plans were automatically created based on the evaluation. The DON stated that all nurses were able to personalize care plans. The DON stated that resident 21 had a gel pad in her wheelchair which was the best thing they did to help heal the pressure ulcer. The DON stated that the intervention was not on the care plan and the care plan was not personalized.
2. Resident 43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included left tibia fracture, chronic kidney disease, urinary tract infection, acute kidney failure, and pain.
On 1/6/20 at 3:00 PM, an interview was conducted with resident 43. Resident 43 stated that her feet were swollen. Resident 43 stated that her feet were uncomfortable and she had sores on her legs because of the swelling. Resident 43 was observed to have gripper socks on. Resident 43 stated that her right sock was wet from her leg. Resident 43's sock was observed to be wet.
On 1/7/20 at 4:30 PM, an observation was made of resident 43. Resident 43 was observed to have a wet bed on the lower right side. Resident 43's right pant leg was wet. Resident 43 stated that her leg was leaking fluid. Resident 43 was not observed to have compression stockings on her legs. Resident 43's left leg was observed to be swollen.
On 1/7/20 at 4:45 PM, an interview was conducted with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 2. CNA 2 stated that resident 43 did not have stocking on. CNA 2 stated that staff tried to elevate resident 43's legs but resident 43 would refuse. CNA 2 stated that resident 43's right leg was leaking and soaked her bed, pant leg, sock, and was on the floor. CNA 2 stated that resident 43 did not have compression stockings or ted hose ordered to apply.
On 1/7/20 at 4:50 PM, an interview was conducted with CNA 3. CNA 3 stated that resident 43's pant leg and bed were wet. CNA 3 stated there was a clear liquid on resident 43's floor in her room and on her pant leg. CNA 3 stated she did not know why resident 43's pant leg and bed were wet. CNA 2 stated to CNA 3 that resident 43's fluid must be coming from her leg. CNA 2 was observed to notify Registered Nurse (RN) 1. RN 1 was observed to enter resident 43's room and was observed to look at resident 43's right leg. CNA 3 stated that resident 43 did not have ted hose or compression stockings to apply.
Resident 43's medical record was reviewed on 1/7/20.
An admission MDS assessment dated [DATE], revealed that resident 43 received diuretics seven times in seven days.
A care plan dated 12/10/19 and revised on 12/31/19, revealed [Resident 43] is on diuretic therapy. The goal developed was [Resident 43] will be free of any discomfort or adverse side effects of diuretic therapy through the review date. The interventions developed were Administer diuretic medications as ordered by physician. Monitor for side effects and effectiveness Q-SHIFT (every shift). Monitor Dose. May require modification in order to achieve desired effects while minimizing adverse consequences, especially when multiple antihypertensives are prescribed simultaneously. When discontinuing, gradual tapering may be required to avoid adverse consequences caused by abrupt cessation. Monitor/document/report PRN adverse reactions to DIURETIC therapy: dizziness, postural hypotension, fatigue, and an increased risk for falls. Report pertinent lab (laboratory) results to MD.
An initial Physician's Assistant (PA) note dated 12/11/19, revealed that resident 43 had 2+ pedal edema. The PA note further revealed that resident 43 had Venous insufficiency (chronic) peripheral [resident 43] has been taking 2 Furosemide tablets. I recommend compression stocking to bilateral lower extremity. [ Note: There was no information regarding the need for compression stocking to be applied on the care plan.]
Resident 43's progress notes revealed the following entries:
a. On 12/10/19 at 1:58 PM, [AGE] year old female admitted .She has 2+ bilat. pedal edema, is alert and oriented x 3 (person, place and time) .
b. On 1/3/20 at 4:03 PM, .Edema 3+ to BLE (bilateral lower extremity).; .
c. On 1/5/20 at 3:07 PM, .1+ bilat. pedal edema.; .
d. On 1/7/20 at 10:25 PM, .Edema LLE (left lower extremity) +3, LRE (right lower extremity) +2.
On 1/7/20 at approximately 4:50 PM, an interview was conducted with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 2. LPN 2 stated that resident 43 had 1+ edema in left leg and no edema in her right leg last week when she worked. LPN 2 stated resident 43 had been up since 2:30 AM that morning and was refusing to lay down. LPN 2 stated that was why resident 43 was having weeping edema from her right leg. LPN 2 stated that resident 43 did not have orders for ted hose and was currently texting the doctor for an order for unna boots to push the fluid back up. LPN 2 stated that resident 43 was administered lasix 40 mg every morning. LPN 2 stated she would try to put resident 43 in her recliner daily but resident 43 refused to be in the recliner for more than an hour, before resident 43 would ask to be put back in her wheelchair.
On 1/8/20 at 11:26 AM, an interview was conducted with LPN 1. LPN 1 stated that resident's were assessed for edema upon admission. LPN 1 stated if resident's were on diuretics their edema would be monitored twice daily. LPN 1 stated that resident 43's legs had been weeping for probably over a week. LPN 1 stated that the PA visited resident 43 regarding her legs about a week ago. LPN 1 stated that she went in with the PA and he said to keep resident 43's legs elevated. LPN 1 stated there were no orders to wrap or use ted hose or anything else to prevent edema. LPN 1 stated that the physician gave orders for unna wraps yesterday because resident 43's legs were weeping.
On 1/8/20 at 2:58 PM, an interview was conducted with the DON. The DON stated that if a resident was to have compression stockings or ted hose the physician wrote an order. The DON stated that the nurse told her yesterday that she was going to try and get some unna boots or tubigrips ordered for resident 43. The DON stated that there was not a physician's order for the compression stockings in resident 43's electronic medical record. The DON stated if resident 43 refused to wear compression stockings it would be documented on the Treatment Administration Record (TAR). The DON stated there was no documentation in the TAR. The DON stated the compression stockings order was not entered into the electronic medical record.
On 1/9/20 at 12:30 PM, an interview was conducted with the DON. The DON stated resident 43 did not have compression stockings as an intervention on her edema care plan. The DON stated that the MDS coordinator updated care plans. The DON stated that nurses were able to personalize care plans.
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation and interview it was determined that the facility did not store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with profession standards for food service safety. Specifically, ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation and interview it was determined that the facility did not store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with profession standards for food service safety. Specifically, there were soiled areas in the kitchen and plastic cups and Styrofoam plates were used for resident dining.
Findings include:
1. On 1/6/20 at 10:46 AM, an initial tour of the kitchen was conducted. The following observations were made:
a. There was dried substance under the shelf above the trayline.
b. There was a bungee cord attached to the handle on the lid of the plate warmer to the pole.
c. The toaster was dirty with a rust color on the top of it.
d. The counter with a coffee machine was soiled with a white substance.
e. There was a fan pointed toward trayline and the food preparation area that was dusty and soiled.
2. On 1/7/20 at 5:47 PM, an observation was made of the dining meal. The salad was served in a clear disposable cup and the dessert was served to some of the residents on a Styrofoam plate.
3. On 1/8/20 at 1:00 PM, a follow up tour of the kitchen was conducted. The following was observed:
a. There was a brown substance behind the counter with the juice machine on it.
b. There were 5 Teflon pans that had large scrapes in the Teflon.
c. There was a plastic bin with container lids soiled with white substance on the outside.
An interview was conducted with [NAME] 1. [NAME] 1 stated that the Teflon pans were used for food preparation.
An interview was conducted with the Dietary Manager (DM). The DM stated that the bungee cord was used to hold the plate warmer lid open. The DM stated that the fan was taken out on Thanksgiving and it had not been cleaned. The DM stated that there were not enough bowls to serve the salad and dessert, so plastic and Styrofoam was used to serve food to the residents.