Thompson House Nursing Home
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Thompson House Nursing Home has received an excellent Trust Grade of A, indicating it is highly regarded and well-recommended. It ranks #4 out of 33 facilities in Vermont, placing it in the top tier, and is also #1 out of 3 in Windham County, meaning it is the best local option available. The facility is on an improving trend, reducing issues from 5 in 2023 to 1 in 2025, which is a positive sign for families considering this home. Staffing is rated at 3 out of 5 stars with a turnover rate of 54%, which is slightly better than the state average, suggesting that while staff retention is decent, there is room for improvement. Notably, there have been no fines reported, which is encouraging. However, there are some areas of concern. Recent inspections have noted issues such as a failure to properly track grievances and potential cleanliness issues in the food storage area. Additionally, there were concerns about ensuring the safety of residents at risk of falls, including instances where care plans may not have been adequately followed. While these weaknesses are important to consider, the overall high ratings and lack of fines indicate that many aspects of care are being managed well.
- Trust Score
- A
- In Vermont
- #4/33
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 54% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Vermont facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ✓ Good
- Each resident gets 55 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than average for Vermont. RNs are trained to catch health problems early.
- Violations ○ Average
- 8 deficiencies on record. Average for a facility this size. Mostly minor or procedural issues.
The Good
-
5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
Near Vermont avg (46%)
Higher turnover may affect care consistency
The Ugly 8 deficiencies on record
Jan 2025
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident remains as free of accident hazards as is possible regarding reviewing interventions for effectiveness and attempting ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Sept 2023
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
3. Per observation on 9/20/2023 at 11:40 am, Resident #5 was seen being assisted off the elevator to the basement level of the facility by the Business Office Manager (BOM). The BOM turned the residen...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Grievances
(Tag F0585)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that all grievances were tracked through to their conclusion by failing to document all decisions including steps taken...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observations the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards. Findings include:
On September 20, 2023, at approximately 1PM during a tour of the dry food storage ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Mar 2023
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Free from Abuse/Neglect
(Tag F0600)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident was free from neglect related to medication administration for 11 of 15 sampled residents (Residents #1-11). Fin...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medical Records
(Tag F0842)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that medical records for each resident are accurately documented related to medication administration records for 12 of 15 sam...
Read full inspector narrative →
Sept 2022
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. Per record review, resident #25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of parkinson's disease, unsteadiness on...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 3. Per record review, resident #18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Delusional disorder, Depression, Sch...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Grade A (90/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Vermont.
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Vermont facilities.
- • No significant concerns identified. This facility shows no red flags across CMS ratings, staff turnover, or federal penalties.
About This Facility
What is Thompson House Nursing Home's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns Thompson House Nursing Home an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Vermont, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Thompson House Nursing Home Staffed?
CMS rates Thompson House Nursing Home's staffing level at 3 out of 5 stars, which is average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 54%, compared to the Vermont average of 46%. RN turnover specifically is 60%, which is notably high. RNs provide skilled clinical oversight, so turnover in this role can affect medical care quality.
What Have Inspectors Found at Thompson House Nursing Home?
State health inspectors documented 8 deficiencies at Thompson House Nursing Home during 2022 to 2025. These included: 8 with potential for harm.
Who Owns and Operates Thompson House Nursing Home?
Thompson House Nursing Home is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 43 certified beds and approximately 40 residents (about 93% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in Brattleboro, Vermont.
How Does Thompson House Nursing Home Compare to Other Vermont Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Vermont, Thompson House Nursing Home's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 2.8, staff turnover (54%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Thompson House Nursing Home?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is Thompson House Nursing Home Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, Thompson House Nursing Home has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Vermont. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Thompson House Nursing Home Stick Around?
Thompson House Nursing Home has a staff turnover rate of 54%, which is 8 percentage points above the Vermont average of 46%. Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Thompson House Nursing Home Ever Fined?
Thompson House Nursing Home has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Thompson House Nursing Home on Any Federal Watch List?
Thompson House Nursing Home is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.