Cedar Hill Health Care Center
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Cedar Hill Health Care Center in Windsor, Vermont, has a Trust Grade of B+, indicating it is above average and recommended for families considering care options. It ranks #1 out of 33 facilities in Vermont and #1 out of 3 in Windsor County, placing it at the top of the local options. However, the facility's trend is concerning as issues increased from 4 in 2023 to 5 in 2024, suggesting a decline in quality. Staffing is a strength, with a 5/5 star rating and a turnover rate of 47%, which is better than the state average. Notably, there were incidents where two residents did not have access to a working call system, putting them at risk for delayed assistance, and a lack of competency assessments for new staff was identified, raising questions about the quality of care. Overall, while Cedar Hill has strong staffing and no fines, the recent increase in issues and specific concerns should be carefully considered.
- Trust Score
- B+
- In Vermont
- #1/33
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Worse
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 47% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Vermont facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ✓ Good
- Each resident gets 50 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than average for Vermont. RNs are trained to catch health problems early.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 13 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
5-Star Staffing Rating · Excellent nurse staffing levels
-
4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
Near Vermont avg (46%)
Higher turnover may affect care consistency
The Ugly 13 deficiencies on record
Jun 2024
5 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on resident and staff interviews and record review the facility failed to report an incident of alleged abuse to the state...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based upon interview and record review, the facility failed to revise resident care plans related to fall prevention for 1 resident [Res.#25] of 21 sampled residents. Findings include:
Per review of ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medical Records
(Tag F0842)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that records are complete, readily accessible, and sys...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0726
(Tag F0726)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that 1 of 4 sampled licensed nursing assistants (LNAs) and 2 of 2 sampled Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs) were assessed for competen...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0919
(Tag F0919)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that each resident had access to an effective call system at their bedside for 2 of 21 residents sampled (Resident #1 a...
Read full inspector narrative →
Apr 2023
4 deficiencies
MINOR
(B)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Deficiency F0582
(Tag F0582)
Minor procedural issue · This affected multiple residents
Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to provide notice of changes in coverage by Medicare for three of three sampled residents (Residents #11, #30, and #4). Findings include...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(B)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Transfer Notice
(Tag F0623)
Minor procedural issue · This affected multiple residents
Based on staff interview and record review the facility failed to provide facility transfer notices prior to transfer for residents and/or their representatives, and to send the same transfer notice (...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(B)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Deficiency F0625
(Tag F0625)
Minor procedural issue · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on staff interview and record review the facility failed to provide a written copy of a Bed-Hold notice to residents and/o...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(B)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Staffing Information
(Tag F0732)
Minor procedural issue · This affected multiple residents
Based on observations and interviews the facility failed to update the required posted staffing information at the beginning of each shift.
Findings include:
On 4/19/23 at 9:30 am, 11:00 am and 12:18...
Read full inspector narrative →
Apr 2022
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0584)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maint...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0583
(Tag F0583)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 2. Observation on 4/20/22 10:50 AM - 11:03 AM revealed an unlocked medication cart, and upon the medication cart was noted a 24 ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
2. Per observation on 4/18/2022 at 11:52 am, Resident #15 was sitting in the common area in a wheelchair without footrests. A licensed nursing assistant (LNA) asked him/her to pick up his/her feet and...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals are stored in accordance with accepted professional standards for 1 of 2 medication carts.
Findings include:
Ob...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Grade B+ (85/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Vermont.
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Vermont facilities.
- • 13 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
About This Facility
What is Cedar Hill Health Care Center's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns Cedar Hill Health Care Center an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Vermont, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Cedar Hill Health Care Center Staffed?
CMS rates Cedar Hill Health Care Center's staffing level at 5 out of 5 stars, which is much above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 47%, compared to the Vermont average of 46%.
What Have Inspectors Found at Cedar Hill Health Care Center?
State health inspectors documented 13 deficiencies at Cedar Hill Health Care Center during 2022 to 2024. These included: 9 with potential for harm and 4 minor or isolated issues.
Who Owns and Operates Cedar Hill Health Care Center?
Cedar Hill Health Care Center is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 39 certified beds and approximately 34 residents (about 87% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in Windsor, Vermont.
How Does Cedar Hill Health Care Center Compare to Other Vermont Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Vermont, Cedar Hill Health Care Center's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 2.8, staff turnover (47%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Cedar Hill Health Care Center?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is Cedar Hill Health Care Center Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, Cedar Hill Health Care Center has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Vermont. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Cedar Hill Health Care Center Stick Around?
Cedar Hill Health Care Center has a staff turnover rate of 47%, which is about average for Vermont nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Cedar Hill Health Care Center Ever Fined?
Cedar Hill Health Care Center has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Cedar Hill Health Care Center on Any Federal Watch List?
Cedar Hill Health Care Center is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.