CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on, clinical record review, staff interview, observation, resident interview, and facility document review, the facility s...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on, clinical record review, staff interview, observation, resident interview, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure a hazard free environment for 1 of 29 residents, Resident #36.
The findings included:
The facility staff failed to ensure a hazard free environment while transferring Resident #36. Resident #36 sustained a skin tear to the left lower leg during a transfer from the wheelchair to the bed.
Resident #36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, fracture of unspecified tarsal bone of left foot, Alzheimer's disease, cognitive communication deficit, hypertension, unsteadiness on feet, depression, and atrial fibrillation.
Section C (cognitive patterns) of Resident #36's most recent comprehensive MDS (minimum data set) assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 11/25/18 included a BIMS (brief interview for mental status) summary score of 10 out of a possible 15 points. Section G (functional status) had been coded to indicate extensive assistance with two persons physical assist (3/3) for transfer.
Resident #36's comprehensive care plan included the focus area: ADL (activities of daily living) Function: Resident requires assistance from staff for daily ADL care ., has interventions that included but were not limited to, Encourage Resident to participate in ADL care as tolerated.
The surveyor interviewed Resident #36 on 01/24/19 9:05 am. Resident #36 stated The CNA (certified nursing assistant) was trying to put me to bed and she did something that made the blood run out. It's been there for a month.
The surveyor spoke to RN (registered nurse) #1 on 01/24/19 10:39 am. RN #1 voiced that Resident #36 acquired a laceration while being transferred to the bed from wheel chair. RN #1 stated, The foot rest on the wheel chair swung around and caught her left leg. The foot rest are off her wheel chair now.
On 01/25/19 at 11:35am, the surveyor interviewed CNA #1 via phone. CNA #1 stated, Resident #36's wheelchair was locked. Resident #36 was assisted to standing and I was using the gait belt per policy. Resident #36 is a one person assist per CNA care plan. Resident #36 was standing with the back of her legs up against the wheelchair. Resident #36's blanket was wrapped around leg rest of wheelchair. She started shaking the wheelchair to loosen the blanket. When the blanket came loose the leg rest swung in, hitting Resident #36 in the left leg causing a skin tear. CNA #1 voiced that she sat Resident #36 on her bed and provided pressure to the wound with a clean towel. CNA #1 called the nurse to evaluate Resident #36 and provide treatment. CNA #1 stated I forgot to take the leg rest off of the wheelchair, but I didn't realize it until Resident #36 was standing to be transferred. I didn't want to leave her standing unsupported or lay the leg rest in the floor as that could be a potential hazard. CNA #1 voiced that she typically transfers Resident #36 without any issue.
The surveyor reviewed a facility document titled Resident Incident Report, under the section titled Incident Witness Statement read in part: I was assisting Resident into the bed when the chair got stuck on her bed and blanket. Resident started to tug on her chair while I was holding her up and the chair had gotten free. That's when the leg of the wheelchair came around and knocked into her leg. Resident belted out a loud scream and when I checked her leg she had blood coming out and her leg had a deep skin tear. So I called for the LPN. I held a rag around the wound until the LPN arrived. The foretold statement was signed by CNA #1 and dated 12/15/18.
The surveyor reviewed Resident #36's clinical record on 01/28/19 at 10:49am. A nursing note dated 12/15/18 at 10:14pm documented by LPN (licensed practical nurse) #1 read in part: 7:20 pm called to Resident's room. CNA was assisting Resident to bed. Her leg got caught on wheelchair. Place on left leg about 4 inches long and at one point an inch wide, ¼ inch deep. Bleeding from area. Pressure applied to stop bleeding. Steri-strips used to pull area together and triple antibiotic ointment applied. 4x4 applied and wrapped. Resting in bed. Took pain pill and all meds without difficulty .Doctor and responsible party (son) notified. Call light in reach.
LPN #1 documented a nursing note dated 12/21/18 at 4:30pm that read in part: New order from doctor received to send Resident to ER (emergency room) for evaluation of wound .
ED (emergency department) summary dated 12/21/18 read in part under diagnoses: Skin tear to left lower leg without complication under instructions of ED Summary it read in part: . skin tear though painful does not appear infected All labs fine .x-ray shows no deep infection .
RN #2 documented a nursing note dated 12/22/18 at 1:13am that read in part: Resident returned back to facility .Orders received from doctor to start Norco 5/325 every 8 hours as needed .He also wants facility's wound care nurse to follow up on wound care .
The administrative team was made aware of the above findings on 01/25/19 at 1:57pm.
No further information regarding this issue was provided to the survey team prior to the exit conference on 01/28/19.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Incontinence Care
(Tag F0690)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 3. For Resident #69 the facility staff failed to ensure Foley catheter tubing was anchored.
Resident #69 was admitted to the fac...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 3. For Resident #69 the facility staff failed to ensure Foley catheter tubing was anchored.
Resident #69 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included but not limited to chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and chronic respiratory failure.
The most recent MDS (minimum data set) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 12/10/18 coded the Resident 11 of 15 in section C, cognitive patterns.
Resident #69's CCP (comprehensive care plan) was reviewed and contained a focus area of Urinary incontinence/foley catheter: Resident at risk for UTI (urinary tract infection) related to chronic foley catheter placement . Interventions included but were not limited to, Provide foley catheter care every shift and as needed.
Resident #69's clinical record was reviewed on 01/28/18. It contained a physician's order summary which read in part, Provide foley catheter care every shift and as needed .
Resident #69 was observed by the surveyor on 01/23/19 at approximately 1:13 pm. Resident was resting in bed. Surveyor asked Resident #69 if her catheter was anchored. Resident #69 pulled back her sheets and stated No. The surveyor observed the catheter tubing not anchored and was positioned across Resident #69's right thigh.
The concern of the Foley catheter not being anchored was discussed with the administrative team during a meeting on 01/24/19 at approximately 4:36pm. The surveyor asked director of nursing (DON) if she expects urinary catheters to be anchored. The DON stated Yes. The surveyor requested a policy on catheter care at this time. The administrator provided the surveyor with said policy titled Catheter Care, Urinary on 01/25/19. This policy read in part under sectioned titled Steps in the Procedure18. Secure catheter utilizing a leg band.
No further information was provided prior to exit.
Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide appropriate treatment and services for care of a resident with a clinically justified indwelling catheter when the indwelling Foley catheters were not anchored for 3 of 29 residents (Resident #104, Resident #34, and Resident #69).
The findings included:
1. The facility staff failed to anchor Resident #104's indwelling Foley catheter.
The clinical record of Resident #104 was reviewed 1/23/19 through 1/28/19. Resident #104 was admitted to the facility 12/10/18 and readmitted [DATE] with diagnoses that included but not limited to hypokalemia, dementia with behavioral disturbances, atrial fibrillation, restlessness and agitation, insomnia, infected left femur fracture, metabolic encephalopathy, urinary tract infection, and hypertension.
Resident #104's significant change minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 1/9/19 assessed the resident with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) as 4/15. Section H Bladder and Bowel was coded for an indwelling catheter (H0100) and urinary continence (H0300) was coded as 9=not rated-resident had a catheter (indwelling, condom), urinary ostomy, or no urine output for entire 7 days.
Current comprehensive care plan initiated 1/10/19 identified urinary incontinency/Foley catheter. Resident is at risk for UTIs (urinary tract infections) r/t (related to) Foley placement. Approaches: change Foley catheter every month and as needed (prn), monitor for changes in urine.
The January 2019 physician orders read Change 16 F (16 French) Foley catheter month (every month).
The surveyor observed Resident #104 on 1/23/19 at 2:37 p.m. Resident #104 was in bed. The surveyor observed a Foley drainage bag attached to the bed frame. Resident #104 was being attended to by licensed practical nurse #1. L.P.N. #1 asked if indwelling Foley catheters were anchored. L.P.N. #1 stated, They are supposed to be. When L.P.N. #1 checked the Foley for anchorage, the Foley was not anchored. L.P.N. #1 stated she would get a leg strap.
The surveyor observed Resident #104 again on 1/24/19 at 8:36 a.m. Resident #104 was in bed. Licensed practical nurse #2 was attending to the resident. Foley catheter was observed to be unanchored. L.P.N. #2 stated Foleys were supposed to be anchor. The surveyor and L.P.N. # attempted to view the size of the Foley catheter. The only readable number was 10 ml (milliliter).
The January 2019 physician orders did not have a bulb size identified in the physician order.
The surveyor informed the administrator, the director of nursing and the corporate registered of the above concern and requested the facility policy on Foley catheter care during the end of the day meeting on 1/24/19 at 4:14 p.m. The surveyor asked the DON if she would expect the staff to anchor indwelling Foley catheters. The DON stated she would expect staff to anchor Foleys.
The surveyor reviewed the facility policy titled Catheter Care, Urinary on 1/25/19. The policy read in part 2. Ensure that the catheters remains secured with a leg strap to reduce friction and movement at the insertion site. (Catheter tubing should be strapped to the resident's inner thigh.)
No further information was provided prior to the exit conference on 1/28/19.
2. The facility staff failed to anchor Resident #34's indwelling Foley catheter.
The clinical record of Resident #34 was reviewed 1/23/19 through 1/28/19. Resident #34 was admitted to the facility 8/23/18 with diagnoses that included but not limited to multiple rib fractures, hyperglycemia, chronic kidney disease, chronic diastolic heart failure, urine retention, hypothyroidism, anemia, hypertension, and benign prostatic hypertrophy.
Resident #34's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 11/21/18 assessed the resident with a BIMS (brief interview for mental status) as 13/15. Section H Bladder and Bowel was coded for an indwelling catheter (H0100) and urinary continence (H0300) was coded as 9=not rated-resident had a catheter (indwelling, condom), urinary ostomy, or no urine output for entire 7 days.
The January 2019 physician orders read Change 18 F (French) Foley catheter q month (every month). The order did not contain the bulb size of the Foley catheter.
The surveyor interviewed Resident #34 on 1/24/19 at 9:58 a.m. The resident was asked if the staff used a strap to hold the catheter to the leg. The resident stated he didn't think it was strapped. Certified nursing assistant #1 was attending to the resident's roommate and was asked to check for anchorage. C.N.A. #1 stated Foleys were supposed to be anchored. When checked, C.N. A. #1 stated the catheter was not anchored but they're supposed to be.
The surveyor informed the administrator, the director of nursing, and the corporate registered nurse in the end of the day meeting on 1/24/19 at 4:14 p.m. The surveyor asked the DON if she would expect the staff to anchor indwelling Foley catheters. The DON stated she would expect staff to anchor Foleys.
The surveyor reviewed the facility policy titled Catheter Care, Urinary on 1/25/19. The policy read in part 2. Ensure that the catheters remains secured with a leg strap to reduce friction and movement at the insertion site. (Catheter tubing should be strapped to the resident's inner thigh.)
No further information was provided prior to the exit conference on 1/28/19.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 3. The facility staff failed to store a nebulizer mask in a plastic bag for Resident #108.
Resident #108 was admitted to the fac...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 3. The facility staff failed to store a nebulizer mask in a plastic bag for Resident #108.
Resident #108 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses of, but not limited to stroke, anxiety disorder and depression. On the quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 1/15/19, the resident was coded as having a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 12 out of a possible score of 15. Resident #108 was also coded as requiring limited supervision of 1 staff member for dressing, extensive assistance of 1 staff member for personal hygiene and being totally dependent on 1 staff member for bathing.
During the initial tour of the facility on 1/23/19 at 12:33 pm, the surveyor observed Resident #108's nebulizer mask sitting on the table bedside of the bed. The mask was not stored in a plastic bag.
The surveyor went back into the resident's room on 1/24/19 at approximately 11 am at which time the surveyor observed the nebulizer mask being stored in a plastic bag.
At 4:15 pm on 1/24/19, the surveyor notified the administrative team of the above findings. The director of nursing stated, That mask should be stored in a plastic bag when not in use by the resident. The surveyor requested a copy of the policy concerning storage of a nebulizer mask when not in use.
On 1/25/19 at 11 am, the surveyor was provided a copy of the facility's policy titled Departmental (Respiratory Therapy) Prevention of Infection. The policy read in part, .Store the circuit in plastic bag, marked with date and resident's name, between uses .
No further findings were provided to the surveyor prior to the exit conference on 1/28/19.
Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide respiratory care and services in accordance with professional standards of care, the resident's care plan and the resident's choice for 3 of 29 residents (Resident #37, Resident #108, and Resident #25).
The findings included:
1. The facility staff failed to ensure the physician ordered oxygen amount was delivered to Resident #37 and failed to change the oxygen tubing weekly.
The clinical record of Resident #37 was reviewed 1/23/19 through 1/28/19. Resident #37 was admitted to the facility 8/11/18 and readmitted [DATE]. Diagnoses included but were not limited to fracture of right tibia, end stage renal disease, candida stomatitis, renal dialysis dependence, type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, anemia, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, chronic pain, and gastro-esophageal reflux disease.
Resident #37's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 1/23/19 assessed the resident with a BIMS (brief interview for mental status) as 15/15. Section O Special Treatments, Procedures, and Programs was coded for oxygen use.
Resident #37's current comprehensive care plan identified respiratory as a problem with an onset date of 1/24/19. Resident #37 was at risk for respiratory complications related to COPD and allergies. The resident wears O2 at 2 L/M (liters per minute) at all times. Approaches: Administer meds (medications) as ordered, O2 per MD (medical doctor) order, monitor O2 sats (saturation levels) q shift (every shift), monitor for respiratory complications, monitor lung sounds qshift, and notify MD prn (as needed).
The surveyor observed Resident #37 on 1/23/19 4:01 PM. Resident #37 was in bed with oxygen via nasal cannula at 3 liters. The oxygen tubing had a pink sticker that was dated 1/12/19.
The surveyor observed Resident #37 again on 1/24/19 at 9:21 a.m. Resident #37 was in bed and finishing breakfast. O2 was at 3 liters and the tubing was dated 1/12/19
The surveyor interviewed licensed practical nurse #3 what oxygen amount was ordered for Resident #37. L.P.N. #3 stated Resident #37 was supposed to have 2 liters. L.P.N. #2 observed the oxygen at 3 liters/nc and changed the liter amount to 2.
The surveyor reviewed the December 2018 physician's orders. The oxygen order dated 10/9/18 read O2 via NC (nasal cannula) @ 2L/M (liters per minute) continuous.
The surveyor informed the administrator, the director of nursing and the corporate registered nurse of the above concern during the end of the day meeting on 1/24/19 at 4:14 p.m. The surveyor requested the facility policy on respiratory care.
The surveyor reviewed the facility policy titled Respiratory Therapy-Prevention of Infection on 1/25/19. The policy read in part Infection Control Considerations Related to Oxygen Administration 7. Change the oxygen cannulae and tubing every seven (7) days, or as needed.
No further information was provided prior to the exit conference on 1/28/19.
2. The facility staff failed to ensure Resident #25 received the amount of oxygen ordered by the physician and failed to date oxygen tubing.
The clinical record of Resident #25 was reviewed 1/23/19 through 1/28/19. Resident #25 was admitted to the facility 2/10/18 and readmitted [DATE] with diagnoses that included but not limited to acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, hypothyroidism, hypercholesterolemia, major depressive disorder, hypertension, acute bronchitis, repeated falls, hyperlipidemia, pressure ulcer stage 2 right buttock, and discitis.
Resident #25's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 11/21/18 assessed the resident with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) as 15/15. Section O Special Treatments, Procedures, and Programs was coded for oxygen use.
Resident #25's current comprehensive care plan initiated 11/23/18 identified the resident to be at risk for respiratory complications related to hx (history) of CHF (congestive heart failure), neb (nebulizer) treatments daily, wears O2 (oxygen) at all times and 1500 fluid restriction. Approaches: Administer meds (medications) per MD (medical doctor) order.
The December 2018 physician's orders read O2 2l (liters) nasal cannula continuous.
The surveyor observed Resident #25 during the initial tour on 1/23/19 beginning at 12:26 p.m. Resident #25 was in bed. An oxygen concentrator was sitting to the left side of the bed and the amount of oxygen was set at 1 and ½ liters. There was no date on the oxygen tubing.
The surveyor observed Resident #25 again on 1/23/19 at 2:41 p.m. Resident #25 was in bed with oxygen via the concentrator set on 1 and ½ liters. No date was observed on the oxygen tubing.
The surveyor observed Resident #25 on 1/24/19 at 9:09 a.m. Resident #25 was in bed and eating breakfast. The oxygen concentrator was on 1 and ½ liters. No date was observed on the oxygen tubing.
The surveyor informed licensed practical nurse #3 of the above observation at 9:30 a.m. L.P.N #3 observed the liter of oxygen setting and moved the concentrator to 2. L.P.N. #3 was asked if the nasal cannula was changed weekly. L.P.N. #3 stated usually done on 11-7 shift.
The surveyor informed the administrator, the director of nursing and the corporate registered nurse of the above observation during the end of the day meeting on 1/24/19 at 4:14 p.m. The surveyor requested the facility policy on respiratory care.
The surveyor reviewed the facility policy titled Respiratory Therapy-Prevention of Infection on 1/25/19. The policy read in part Infection Control Considerations Related to Oxygen Administration 7. Change the oxygen cannulae and tubing every seven (7) days, or as needed.
No further information was provided prior to the exit conference on 1/28/19.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility staff failed to discard expired medications on 1 of 3 medication carts inspected.
On 1/25/19 at 11:00 AM, the surveyor checked the medication car...
Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility staff failed to discard expired medications on 1 of 3 medication carts inspected.
On 1/25/19 at 11:00 AM, the surveyor checked the medication cart on Side 2 for expired medications. The surveyor found 3 containers of artificial tears with expiration date 12/2018. The containers were labeled with the names of 3 unsampled residents. Medication administration records indicated that the 3 residents had received the medications daily in the 24 days after the expiration date. The nurse was informed of the concern and pulled the eye drops from the cart and went to the supply room for replacements.
The director of nursing and administrator were notified of the issue on 1/25/19.
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medical Records
(Tag F0842)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to maintain a complete...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to maintain a complete and accurate clinical record for 1 of 29 residents (Resident #117).
The findings included:
The facility staff failed to ensure a registered nurse documented when Resident #117 was pronounced dead.
The clinical record of Resident #117 was reviewed [DATE]. Resident #117 was admitted to the facility [DATE] and expired [DATE]. Diagnoses included but were not limited to Alzheimer's disease, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, atherosclerotic heart disease, chronic kidney disease, hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, insomnia, anxiety, major depressive disorder, and gastrointestinal hemorrhage.
Resident #117's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of [DATE] assessed the resident with a brief interview for mental status as 0/15.
The departmental note dated [DATE] 6:34 a.m. read Upon rounding, resident was observed in bed with no respirations, no apical pulse, no blood pressure, no oxygen saturation. Her skin is cool to touch and model (sic) up to her legs and hands. RN (registered nurse) notified and comfirmed (sic) findings time of death 01613. Notified RP (responsible party) and Dr. (Doctor). RP stated to send body to ____ (name of nursing home omitted). Signed by licensed practical nurse #4.
The surveyor was unable to locate documentation by the registered nurse of Resident #117's death in the clinical record.
The surveyor informed the director of nursing (DON) of the above issue on [DATE] at 11:56 a.m. The DON was unable to locate documentation by the RN of Resident #117's death. The DON stated she would expect staff especially the RN on duty when Resident #117 expired to document their findings.
The surveyor requested the facility policy on documentation from the director of nursing on [DATE].
The surveyor reviewed the facility policy titled Charting and Documentation on [DATE]. The policy read in part 2. The following information is to be documented in the resident medical record: d. Changes in the resident's condition.
No further information was provided prior to the e exit conference on [DATE].
MINOR
(C)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Transfer Requirements
(Tag F0622)
Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide the receivin...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide the receiving provider with the appropriate information to include basis for the transfer, contact information of the practitioner responsible for the care of the resident, resident representative information including contact information, Advanced Directive information, all special instructions or precautions for ongoing care, comprehensive care plan goals, and all other necessary information including a copy of the resident's discharge summary and failed to document information provided to the receiving provider for 10 of 29 residents (Resident #267, Resident #104, Resident #83, Resident #90, Resident #36, Resident #115, Resident #218, Resident #19, Resident #25, and Resident #69).
The findings included:
1. The facility staff failed to provide the receiving provider with information for on-going care when Resident #104 was transferred to the hospital.
The clinical record of Resident #104 was reviewed 1/23/19 through 1/28/19. Resident #104 was admitted to the facility 12/10/18 and readmitted [DATE] with diagnoses that included but not limited to hypokalemia, dementia with behavioral disturbances, atrial fibrillation, restlessness and agitation, insomnia, infected left femur fracture, metabolic encephalopathy, urinary tract infection, and hypertension.
Resident #104's significant change minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 1/9/19 assessed the resident with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) as 4/15.
The departmental note dated 12/19/18 at 2:18 p.m. read in part She is leaving facility at this time for direct admit to RGH (name of hospital omitted). Transported via (name of ambulance service omitted) and two attendants.
The departmental notes were reviewed on 1/24/19. The 12/19/18 5:32 p.m. departmental note read, RGH (name of hospital) nurse called and wanted to know why resident was there. She did not get a report from this facility as to why. They do have a bed and she is been admitted (sic) at this time.
The clinical record had no documentation of contact information, what information was provided to the hospital, advanced directive information, resident representative contact information, contact information from the facility, transfer form, comprehensive careplan goals sent, or any special instructions or bed hold offer.
The surveyor informed the administrator, the director of nursing and the corporate registered nurse of the above concern during the end of the day meeting on 1/24/19 at 4:14 p.m. The survey team asked what information was provided when residents are transferred to the hospital. The director of nursing stated the face sheet and the medication administration record (MAR). The DON stated the facility was just beginning to work on a form called Interact but had to be completed. The surveyor requested the facility policy on transfers/discharges.
The director of nursing provided the surveyor with the policy titled Bed-Holds and Returns on 1/25/19. The policy read in part Prior to transfers and therapeutic leaves, residents or resident representatives will be informed in writing of the bed-hold and return policy.
The director of nursing did not provide a policy for transfers/discharges prior to the exit conference on 1/28/19.
2. The facility staff failed to provide Resident #90's transfer/discharge information to the receiving provider when transferred to the hospital on [DATE] and 11/4/18.
The clinical record of Resident #90 was reviewed 1/23/19 through 1/28/19. Resident #61 was admitted to the facility 3/13/17 and readmitted [DATE] and 11/7/18 with diagnoses that included but not limited to vascular dementia without behavioral disturbances, type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypothyroidism, cervical disc disorder, right femur intertrochanteric fracture, osteoporosis, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, contusion of scalp, chronic diastolic heart failure, cerebral infarction, dysphagia, major depressive disorder, polyneuropathy, anemia, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia.
Resident #90's significant change in assessment minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 1/2/19 assessed the resident with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) as 7/15.
A telephone order dated 10/29/18 read May send resident to ER (emergency room) for eval (evaluation) & treat (treatment).
The surveyor reviewed the departmental note dated 10/29/18 10:44 p.m. The note read in part: Late Entry: This nurse was called to therapy gym. Resident was found in floor on right side. Resident stated she had lost her balance and fell to the floor. Upon assessment resident stated she had pain in her right hip and right side of her head on a pain scale of 4 out of 10. Right side of head had hematoma present. Resident was assisted to wheelchair and to her room. MD (medical doctor) notified (name omitted) concerned of resident on Coumadin with the fall and wanted resident to be sent to ER (name omitted). Transport arrived at 1820 (6:20 p.m.) and resident left via stretcher.
Departmental note dated 10/30/18 10:44 a.m. read in part Resident admitted to hospital.
A second physician order dated 11/4/18 read May send out to ER (name omitted) for eval & tx (treatment) due to increased confusion, combativeness, trying to harm self and decreased O2 (oxygen) sat (saturation).
The surveyor reviewed the departmental note dated 11/4/18 6:46 p.m. The note read Late entry 6p.m. Resident noted to have increased confusion with big change in personality. She has been very combative to staff this shift. Resident can normally hold a normal conversation, but cannot at this time. She began doing things to herself, such as, pulling her own hair, bending fingers backwards while looking at staff and stating look here, I'm going to tell them you did this. You are going to be accused of it. This is not normal behavior for this resident. This nurse sent to ER for eval and tx. Physician aware and RP (responsible party) agrees with this nurses decision and is meeting resident at hospital.
The clinical record did not have documentation of resident information provided to the receiving provider of the advanced directive, contact information of the resident representative or contact information of the sending facility, comprehensive care plan goals, discharge summary/transfer form, or special instructions for care or bed hold offer.
The surveyor informed the director of nursing of the above information not found in the clinical record for either of Resident #61's transfers to the emergency room and subsequent admissions to the hospital on [DATE] and 11/4/18 on 1/27/19 at 3:55 p.m. The director of nursing stated the only information sent with the resident was the face sheet and the medication administration record (MAR).
The surveyor informed the administrator, the director of nursing and the corporate registered nurse of the above concern during the end of the day meeting on 1/24/19 at 4:14 p.m. The survey team asked what information was provided when residents are transferred to the hospital. The director of nursing stated the face sheet and the medication administration record (MAR). The DON stated the facility was just beginning to work on a form called Interact but had to be completed. The surveyor requested the facility policy on transfers/discharges.
The director of nursing provided the surveyor with the policy titled Bed-Holds and Returns on 1/25/19. The policy read in part Prior to transfers and therapeutic leaves, residents or resident representatives will be informed in writing of the bed-hold and return policy.
The director of nursing did not provide a policy for transfers/discharges prior to the exit conference on 1/28/19.
3. The facility staff failed to provide transfer/discharge information to the receiving provider when Resident #218 was transferred to the hospital.
The clinical record of Resident #218 was reviewed 1/23/19 through 1/28/19. Resident #218 was admitted to the facility 4/6/18 and readmitted [DATE] with diagnoses that included but not limited to acute osteomyelitis, sepsis, cellulitis of right lower limb and chronic respiratory failure with hypercapnia.
Resident #218's admission minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 1/14/19 assessed the resident with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) as 15/15.
The clinical record revealed three emergency room visits with two requiring hospitalizations. Resident #218 was sent to the emergency room on [DATE] for abdominal pain and constipation. There was documentation that a report was called to the emergency room but no further evidence of what information was provided to the receiving provider.
The clinical record revealed Resident #218 was admitted to the hospital 1/4/19 as evidenced by the physician discharge summary for 1/4/19-1/7/19. The departmental note dated 1/4/19 at 3:43 a.m. read Resident left facility via wheelchair with son at 3:40 a.m. to go to an appointment. No skin issues or distress noted. The departmental note dated 1/4/19 at 11:44 a.m. read Resident continues to be out of facility. The departmental note dated 1/4/19 at 10:44 p.m. read Resident remains OOF (out of facility) at hospital.
None of the notes dated 1/4/19 detail information sent to the receiving provider when the resident did not return to the facility on 1/4/19.
The clinical record revealed Resident #218 was admitted to the hospital 1/18/19-1/21/19 for acute kidney injury. The departmental note dated 1/18/19 at 1:53 p.m. read in part Resident complains of feeling bad. Could not state exactly what her complaints were more specifically. Did state she was having double vision and that her vision was wavey. MD (medical doctor-name omitted) notified. Telephone order received to send patient to ER (emergency room) for evaluation and treatment of complaints.
The departmental note dated 1/18/19 at 2:24 p.m. read EMS (emergency medical services) notified for transport to the ED (emergency department), report called to ED (name omitted).
The departmental note dated 1/19/19 at 10:32 a.m. read in part Resident was admitted [DATE] for acute kidney injury.
None of the transfers/discharges/hospitalizations had documentation in the clinical record of information provided to the receiving provider-contact information of the practitioner, contact information of the resident representative, transfer form, advanced directive, comprehensive care plan goals, or any pertinent information pertaining to the ongoing care of the resident or offer of bed-hold information.
The survey team met with the administrator, the director of nursing (DON), and the corporate registered nurse on 1/24/19 at 4:14 p.m. and informed them of the required information sent to the hospital when a resident was transferred. The DON stated a face sheet and a medication administration record (MAR).
The DON stated the facility was just beginning to work on a form called Interact but had to be completed. The surveyor requested the facility policy on transfers/discharges.
The director of nursing provided the surveyor with the policy titled Bed-Holds and Returns on 1/25/19. The policy read in part Prior to transfers and therapeutic leaves, residents or resident representatives will be informed in writing of the bed-hold and return policy.
The director of nursing did not provide a policy for transfers/discharges prior to the exit conference on 1/28/19.
4. The facility staff failed to provide transfer/discharge information to the receiving provider when Resident #25 was sent to the hospital 1/11/19.
The clinical record of Resident #25 was reviewed 1/23/19 through 1/28/19. Resident #25 was admitted to the facility 2/10/18 and readmitted [DATE] with diagnoses that included but not limited to acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, hypothyroidism, hypercholesterolemia, major depressive disorder, hypertension, acute bronchitis, repeated falls, hyperlipidemia, pressure ulcer stage 2 right buttock, and discitis.
Resident #25's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 11/21/18 assessed the resident with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) as 15/15.
The clinical record revealed a telephone order dated 1/11/19 that read May send out to ER (emergency room) (name of hospital omitted) for eval (evaluation)/tx (treatment) d/t (due to) fall & c/o (complaints of) pain.
The surveyor reviewed the 1/11/19 6:07 p.m. departmental note. The note read in part: @1728 (5:28 p.m.) staff stated that resident was in the floor. Resident was observed to be laying on his left side on the left side of the bed. Blood was coming from resident's head and left forearm. Pressure was held onto (sic) bleeding areas. 911 was called for transport. Resident stated that his left hip, left shoulder and head was hurting. Unable to do neuro checks due to resident's refusal. MD (medical doctor) and RP (responsible party) aware. Rescue squad arrived x3 attendants. Resident was assisted onto the stretcher x3 attendants and 2 employees. Resident left the facility at this time. Report was called to ER (emergency room) (name omitted).
The departmental note failed to have evidence of information sent with Resident #25 when the resident was transferred to the hospital-no transfer form/discharge form, contact information, resident representative contact information, comprehensive care plan goals, advanced directive, or any pertinent tests or bed hold information.
The survey team had discussed the concerns with transfer/discharges and information sent with residents in the end of the day meeting on 1/24/19 at 4:14 p.m. with the administrator, the director of nursing (DON) and the corporate registered nurse. The DON stated information sent with the resident when transferred included the face sheet and the medication administration record.
No further information was provided prior to the exit conference on 1/28/19.
5. There were six other residents who were transferred to hospitals and the facility staff failed to provide information to the receiving providers. Those residents were identified as Resident #267, Resident #83, Resident #36, Resident #115, Resident #19, and Resident #69.
The survey team met with the administrator, the director of nursing (DON) and the corporate registered nurse on 1/24/19 at 4:14 p.m. and during the meeting asked what information was provided to the receiving provider when transferred to the hospital. The DON stated the face sheet and the medication administration record were sent. The DON stated the facility was just beginning to work on paperwork to be sent with residents when they are transferred to the hospital. The DON stated the facility was reviewing a form called Interact for transfers.
No further information was provided prior to the exit conference on 1/28/19.
MINOR
(C)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Transfer Notice
(Tag F0623)
Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide written noti...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide written notice of transfer/discharge to include the effective date of transfer or discharge; the location to which the resident is transferred or discharged ; a statement of the resident's appeal rights, including the name, address (mailing and email), and telephone number of the entity which receives such requests; and information on how to obtain an appeal form and assistance in completing the form and submitting the appeal hearing request; the name, address (mailing and email) and telephone number of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman and documentation in the medical record that the notice was sent to the Ombudsman for 10 of 29 residents (Resident #287, Resident #104, Resident #83, Resident #90, Resident #36, Resident #115, Resident #218, Resident #19, Resident #25, and Resident #69).
The findings included:
1. The facility staff failed to provide written notice of transfer to the resident and the resident representative when Resident #104 was transferred to the hospital and failed to document in the medical record ombudsman notification.
The clinical record of Resident #104 was reviewed 1/23/19 through 1/28/19. Resident #104 was admitted to the facility 12/10/18 and readmitted [DATE] with diagnoses that included but not limited to hypokalemia, dementia with behavioral disturbances, atrial fibrillation, restlessness and agitation, insomnia, infected left femur fracture, metabolic encephalopathy, urinary tract infection, and hypertension.
Resident #104's significant change minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 1/9/19 assessed the resident with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) as 4/15.
The departmental note dated 12/19/18 at 2:18 p.m. read in part She is leaving facility at this time for direct admit to RGH (name of hospital omitted). Transported via (name of ambulance service omitted) and two attendants.
The departmental notes were reviewed on 1/24/19. The 12/19/18 5:32 p.m. departmental note read, RGH (name of hospital) nurse called and wanted to know why resident was there. She did not get a report from this facility as to why. They do have a bed and she is been admitted (sic) at this time.
The clinical record had no documentation that the written notice of transfer was given to the resident and the resident representative and there was no ombudsman notification documented in the clinical record.
The surveyor informed the administrator, the director of nursing and the corporate registered nurse of the above concern during the end of the day meeting on 1/24/19 at 4:14 p.m. The survey team asked what information was provided when residents are transferred to the hospital. The director of nursing stated the face sheet and the medication administration record (MAR). The DON stated the facility was just beginning to work on a form called Interact but had to be completed. The surveyor requested the facility policy on transfers/discharges.
The director of nursing provided the surveyor with the policy titled Bed-Holds and Returns on 1/25/19. The policy read in part Prior to transfers and therapeutic leaves, residents or resident representatives will be informed in writing of the bed-hold and return policy.
The director of nursing did not provide a policy for transfers/discharges prior to the exit conference on 1/28/19.
2. The facility staff failed to provide written notice of transfer to the resident and the resident representative when Resident #90 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] and 11/4/18 and failed to document in the medical record ombudsman notification.
The clinical record of Resident #90 was reviewed 1/23/19 through 1/28/19. Resident #90 was admitted to the facility 3/13/17 and readmitted [DATE] and 11/7/18 with diagnoses that included but not limited to vascular dementia without behavioral disturbances, type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypothyroidism, cervical disc disorder, right femur intertrochanteric fracture, osteoporosis, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, contusion of scalp, chronic diastolic heart failure, cerebral infarction, dysphagia, major depressive disorder, polyneuropathy, anemia, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia.
Resident #90's significant change in assessment minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 1/2/19 assessed the resident with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) as 7/15.
A telephone order dated 10/29/18 read May send resident to ER (emergency room) for eval (evaluation) & treat (treatment).
The surveyor reviewed the departmental note dated 10/29/18 10:44 p.m. The note read in part: Late Entry: This nurse was called to therapy gym. Resident was found in floor on right side. Resident stated she had lost her balance and fell to the floor. Upon assessment resident stated she had pain in her right hip and right side of her head on a pain scale of 4 out of 10. Right side of head had hematoma present. Resident was assisted to wheelchair and to her room. MD (medical doctor) notified (name omitted) concerned of resident on Coumadin with the fall and wanted resident to be sent to ER (name omitted). Transport arrived at 1820 (6:20 p.m.) and resident left via stretcher.
Departmental note dated 10/30/18 10:44 a.m. read in part Resident admitted to hospital.
A second physician order dated 11/4/18 read May send out to ER (name omitted) for eval & tx (treatment) due to increased confusion, combativeness, trying to harm self and decreased O2 (oxygen) sat (saturation).
The surveyor reviewed the departmental note dated 11/4/18 6:46 p.m. The note read Late entry 6 p.m. Resident noted to have increased confusion with big change in personality. She has been very combative to staff this shift. Resident can normally hold a normal conversation, but cannot at this time. She began doing things to herself, such as, pulling her own hair, bending fingers backwards while looking at staff and stating look here, I'm going to tell them you did this. You are going to be accused of it. This is not normal behavior for this resident. This nurse sent to ER for eval and tx. Physician aware and RP (responsible party) agrees with this nurses decision and is meeting resident at hospital.
The clinical record had no documentation that the written notice of transfer was given to the resident and the resident representative and there was no ombudsman notification documented in the clinical record.
The surveyor informed the director of nursing of the above information not found in the clinical record for either of Resident #90's transfers to the emergency room and subsequent admissions to the hospital on [DATE] and 11/4/18 on 1/27/19 at 3:55 p.m. The director of nursing stated the only information sent with the resident was the face sheet and the medication administration record (MAR).
The surveyor informed the administrator, the director of nursing and the corporate registered nurse of the above concern during the end of the day meeting on 1/24/19 at 4:14 p.m. The survey team asked what information was provided when residents are transferred to the hospital. The director of nursing stated the face sheet and the medication administration record (MAR). The DON stated the facility was just beginning to work on a form called Interact but had to be completed. The surveyor requested the facility policy on transfers/discharges.
The director of nursing provided the surveyor with the policy titled Bed-Holds and Returns on 1/25/19. The policy read in part Prior to transfers and therapeutic leaves, residents or resident representatives will be informed in writing of the bed-hold and return policy.
The director of nursing did not provide a policy for transfers/discharges prior to the exit conference on 1/28/19.
3. The facility staff failed to provide written notice of transfer to the resident and resident representative and failed to document ombudsman notification in the clinical record when Resident #218 was transferred to the hospital.
The clinical record of Resident #218 was reviewed 1/23/19 through 1/28/19. Resident #218 was admitted to the facility 4/6/18 and readmitted [DATE] with diagnoses that included but not limited to acute osteomyelitis, sepsis, cellulitis of right lower limb and chronic respiratory failure with hypercapnia.
Resident #218's admission minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 1/14/19 assessed the resident with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) as 15/15.
The clinical record revealed three emergency room visits with two requiring hospitalizations. Resident #218 was sent to the emergency room on [DATE] for abdominal pain and constipation. There was documentation that a report was called to the emergency room but no further evidence of what information was provided to the receiving provider. The clinical record had no documentation that the written notice of transfer was given to the resident and the resident representative on 11/24/18 and there was no ombudsman notification documented in the clinical record.
The clinical record revealed Resident #218 was admitted to the hospital 1/4/19 as evidenced by the physician discharge summary for 1/4/19-1/7/19. The departmental note dated 1/4/19 at 3:43 a.m. read Resident left facility via wheelchair with son at 3:40 a.m. to go to an appointment. No skin issues or distress noted. The departmental note dated 1/4/19 at 11:44 a.m. read Resident continues to be out of facility. The departmental note dated 1/4/19 at 10:44 p.m. read Resident remains OOF (out of facility) at hospital.
The clinical record had no documentation that the written notice of transfer was given to the resident and the resident representative on 1/4/19 and there was no ombudsman notification documented in the clinical record.
The clinical record revealed Resident #218 was admitted to the hospital 1/18/19-1/21/19 for acute kidney injury. The departmental note dated 1/18/19 at 1:53 p.m. read in part Resident complains of feeling bad. Could not state exactly what her complaints were more specifically. Did state she was having double vision and that her vision was wavey. MD (medical doctor-name omitted) notified. Telephone order received to send patient to ER (emergency room) for evaluation and treatment of complaints.
The departmental note dated 1/18/19 at 2:24 p.m. read EMS (emergency medical services) notified for transport to the ED (emergency department), report called to ED (name omitted).
The departmental note dated 1/19/19 at 10:32 a.m. read in part Resident was admitted [DATE] for acute kidney injury.
The clinical record had no documentation that the written notice of transfer was given to the resident and the resident representative and there was no ombudsman notification documented in the clinical record.
The survey team met with the administrator, the director of nursing (DON), and the corporate registered nurse on 1/24/19 at 4:14 p.m. and informed them of the required information sent to the hospital when a resident was transferred. The DON stated only a face sheet and a medication administration record (MAR) are sent.
The DON stated the facility was just beginning to work on a form called Interact but had to be completed. The surveyor requested the facility policy on transfers/discharges.
The director of nursing provided the surveyor with the policy titled Bed-Holds and Returns on 1/25/19. The policy read in part Prior to transfers and therapeutic leaves, residents or resident representatives will be informed in writing of the bed-hold and return policy.
The director of nursing did not provide a policy for transfers/discharges prior to the exit conference on 1/28/19.
4. The facility staff failed to provide written transfer/discharge information to the resident and resident representative and failed to document ombudsman notification in the clinical record when Resident #25 was sent to the hospital 1/11/19.
The clinical record of Resident #25 was reviewed 1/23/19 through 1/28/19. Resident #25 was admitted to the facility 2/10/18 and readmitted [DATE] with diagnoses that included but not limited to acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, hypothyroidism, hypercholesterolemia, major depressive disorder, hypertension, acute bronchitis, repeated falls, hyperlipidemia, pressure ulcer stage 2 right buttock, and discitis.
Resident #25's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 11/21/18 assessed the resident with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) as 15/15.
The clinical record revealed a telephone order dated 1/11/19 that read May send out to ER (emergency room) (name of hospital omitted) for eval (evaluation)/tx (treatment) d/t (due to) fall & c/o (complaints of) pain.
The surveyor reviewed the 1/11/19 6:07 p.m. departmental note. The note read in part: @1728 (5:28 p.m.) staff stated that resident was in the floor. Resident was observed to be laying on his left side on the left side of the bed. Blood was coming from resident's head and left forearm. Pressure was held onto (sic) bleeding areas. 911 was called for transport. Resident stated that his left hip, left shoulder and head was hurting. Unable to do neuro checks due to resident's refusal. MD (medical doctor) and RP (responsible party) aware. Rescue squad arrived x3 attendants. Resident was assisted onto the stretcher x3 attendants and 2 employees. Resident left the facility at this time. Report was called to ER (emergency room) (name omitted).
The departmental note failed to have evidence that written notice of transfer/discharge information was provided to the resident and resident representative when Resident #25 was transferred to the hospital and there was no documentation of ombudsman notification found in the clinical record.
The survey team had discussed the concerns with transfer/discharges and information sent with residents in the end of the day meeting on 1/24/19 at 4:14 p.m. with the administrator, the director of nursing (DON) and the corporate registered nurse. The DON stated information sent with the resident when transferred included the face sheet and the medication administration record.
No further information was provided prior to the exit conference on 1/28/19.
5. There were six other residents who were transferred to hospitals and the facility staff failed to provide written notice of transfer/discharge to the resident and the resident representative and failed to document ombudsman notification in the clinical record. Those residents were identified as Resident #267, Resident #83, Resident #36, Resident #115, Resident #19, and Resident #69.
The survey team met with the administrator, the director of nursing (DON) and the corporate registered nurse on 1/24/19 at 4:14 p.m. and during the meeting asked what information was provided to the receiving provider when transferred to the hospital. The DON stated the face sheet and the medication administration record were sent. The DON stated the facility does not give the resident and resident representative written notice of transfer/discharge. The DON stated the facility was reviewing a form called Interact for transfers.
No further information was provided prior to the exit conference on 1/28/19.
MINOR
(C)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Deficiency F0625
(Tag F0625)
Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide to the resid...
Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide to the resident and the resident representative at the time of transfer/discharge written notice which specifies the duration of the bed-hold policy for 8 of 29 residents (Resident #104, Resident #83, Resident #90, Resident #36, Resident #115, Resident #218, Resident #25 and Resident #69).
The findings included:
1. The facility staff failed to provide Resident #104 and the resident representative written information about bed-hold when the resident was transferred to the hospital 12/19/18.
The clinical record of Resident #104 was reviewed 1/23/19 through 1/28/19. Resident #104 was admitted to the facility 12/10/18 and readmitted [DATE] with diagnoses that included but not limited to hypokalemia, dementia with behavioral disturbances, atrial fibrillation, restlessness and agitation, insomnia, infected left femur fracture, metabolic encephalopathy, urinary tract infection, and hypertension.
Resident #104's significant change minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 1/9/19 assessed the resident with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) as 4/15.
The departmental note dated 12/19/18 at 2:18 p.m. read in part She is leaving facility at this time for direct admit to RGH (name of hospital omitted). Transported via (name of ambulance service omitted) and two attendants.
The departmental notes were reviewed on 1/24/19. The 12/19/18 5:32 p.m. departmental note read, RGH (name of hospital) nurse called and wanted to know why resident was there. She did not get a report from this facility as to why. They do have a bed and she is been admitted (sic) at this time.
The clinical record had no documentation that a bed hold was offered to the resident and the resident representative prior to transfer to the hospital on [DATE].
The surveyor informed the administrator, the director of nursing and the corporate registered nurse of the above concern during the end of the day meeting on 1/24/19 at 4:14 p.m. The survey team asked what information was provided when residents are transferred to the hospital. The director of nursing stated the face sheet and the medication administration record (MAR). The DON stated the nurses usually offer a bed hold when the residents are transferred. The DON was asked if this information should be documented in the clinical record. The DON stated the nurses should document when bed holds are offered in the clinical record.
The director of nursing provided the surveyor with the policy titled Bed-Holds and Returns on 1/25/19. The policy read in part Prior to transfers and therapeutic leaves, residents or resident representatives will be informed in writing of the bed-hold and return policy.
No further information was provided prior to the exit conference on 1/28/19.
2. The facility staff failed to provide Resident #90 and the resident representative written bed hold information when the resident was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] and 11/4/18.
The clinical record of Resident #90 was reviewed 1/23/19 through 1/28/19. Resident #90 was admitted to the facility 3/13/17 and readmitted [DATE] and 11/7/18 with diagnoses that included but not limited to vascular dementia without behavioral disturbances, type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypothyroidism, cervical disc disorder, right femur intertrochanteric fracture, osteoporosis, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, contusion of scalp, chronic diastolic heart failure, cerebral infarction, dysphagia, major depressive disorder, polyneuropathy, anemia, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia.
Resident #90's significant change in assessment minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 1/2/19 assessed the resident with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) as 7/15.
A telephone order dated 10/29/18 read May send resident to ER (emergency room) for eval (evaluation) & treat (treatment).
The surveyor reviewed the departmental note dated 10/29/18 10:44 p.m. The note read in part: Late Entry: This nurse was called to therapy gym. Resident was found in floor on right side. Resident stated she had lost her balance and fell to the floor. Upon assessment resident stated she had pain in her right hip and right side of her head on a pain scale of 4 out of 10. Right side of head had hematoma present. Resident was assisted to wheelchair and to her room. MD (medical doctor) notified (name omitted) concerned of resident on Coumadin with the fall and wanted resident to be sent to ER (name omitted). Transport arrived at 1820 (6:20 p.m.) and resident left via stretcher.
Departmental note dated 10/30/18 10:44 a.m. read in part Resident admitted to hospital.
A second physician order dated 11/4/18 read May send out to ER (name omitted) for eval & tx (treatment) due to increased confusion, combativeness, trying to harm self and decreased O2 (oxygen) sat (saturation).
The surveyor reviewed the departmental note dated 11/4/18 6:46 p.m. The note read Late entry 6p.m. Resident noted to have increased confusion with big change in personality. She has been very combative to staff this shift. Resident can normally hold a normal conversation, but cannot at this time. She began doing things to herself, such as, pulling her own hair, bending fingers backwards while looking at staff and stating look here, I'm going to tell them you did this. You are going to be accused of it. This is not normal behavior for this resident. This nurse sent to ER for eval and tx. Physician aware and RP (responsible party) agrees with this nurses decision and is meeting resident at hospital.
The clinical record did not have documentation that written notice of bed hold information was provided to the resident and the resident representative when Resident #90 was transferred to the hospital 10/29/18 or 11/4/18.
The surveyor informed the director of nursing of the above information not found in the clinical record for either of Resident #90's transfers to the emergency room and subsequent admissions to the hospital on [DATE] and 11/4/18 on 1/27/19 at 3:55 p.m. The director of nursing stated the only information sent with the resident was the face sheet and the medication administration record (MAR).
The surveyor informed the administrator, the director of nursing and the corporate registered nurse of the above concern during the end of the day meeting on 1/24/19 at 4:14 p.m. The survey team asked what information was provided when residents are transferred to the hospital. The director of nursing stated the face sheet and the medication administration record (MAR). The DON stated the nurses usually offer a bed hold when the residents are transferred. The DON was asked if this information should be documented in the clinical record. The DON stated the nurses should document when bed holds are offered in the clinical record.
The director of nursing provided the surveyor with the policy titled Bed-Holds and Returns on 1/25/19. The policy read in part Prior to transfers and therapeutic leaves, residents or resident representatives will be informed in writing of the bed-hold and return policy.
No further information was provided prior to the exit conference on 1/28/19.
3. The facility staff failed to provide Resident #218 and the resident representative written information about bed-hold when the resident was transferred to the hospital 11/24/18, 1/4/19, and 1/18/19.
The clinical record of Resident #218 was reviewed 1/23/19 through 1/28/19. Resident #218 was admitted to the facility 4/6/18 and readmitted [DATE] with diagnoses that included but not limited to acute osteomyelitis, sepsis, cellulitis of right lower limb and chronic respiratory failure with hypercapnia.
Resident #218's admission minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 1/14/19 assessed the resident with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) as 15/15.
The clinical record revealed three emergency room visits with two requiring hospitalizations. Resident #218 was sent to the emergency room on [DATE] for abdominal pain and constipation. There was documentation that a report was called to the emergency room but no further evidence of what information was provided to the receiving provider or that the resident and the resident representative was offered a bed hold when transferred.
The clinical record revealed Resident #218 was admitted to the hospital 1/4/19 as evidenced by the physician discharge summary for 1/4/19-1/7/19. The departmental note dated 1/4/19 at 3:43 a.m. read Resident left facility via wheelchair with son at 3:40 a.m. to go to an appointment. No skin issues or distress noted. The departmental note dated 1/4/19 at 11:44 a.m. read Resident continues to be out of facility. The departmental note dated 1/4/19 at 10:44 p.m. read Resident remains OOF (out of facility) at hospital.
None of the notes dated 1/4/19 detail information sent to the receiving provider when the resident did not return to the facility on 1/4/19 or information about bed holds was offered to the resident and the resident representative. The surveyor interviewed Resident #218 on 1/23/19 at 3:37 p.m. The resident stated she thought she was informed about bed-holds.
The clinical record revealed Resident #218 was admitted to the hospital 1/18/19-1/21/19 for acute kidney injury. The departmental note dated 1/18/19 at 1:53 p.m. read in part Resident complains of feeling bad. Could not state exactly what her complaints were more specifically. Did state she was having double vision and that her vision was wavey. MD (medical doctor-name omitted) notified. Telephone order received to send patient to ER (emergency room) for evaluation and treatment of complaints.
The departmental note dated 1/18/19 at 2:24 p.m. read EMS (emergency medical services) notified for transport to the ED (emergency department), report called to ED (name omitted).
The departmental note dated 1/19/19 at 10:32 a.m. read in part Resident was admitted [DATE] for acute kidney injury.
The surveyor was unable to locate documentation in the clinical record of bed-hold. The surveyor informed the administrator, the director of nursing and the corporate registered nurse of the above concern during the end of the day meeting on 1/24/19 at 4:14 p.m. The survey team asked what information was provided when residents are transferred to the hospital. The director of nursing stated the face sheet and the medication administration record (MAR). The DON stated the nurses usually offer a bed hold when the residents are transferred. The DON was asked if this information should be documented in the clinical record. The DON stated the nurses should document when bed holds are offered in the clinical record.
The director of nursing provided the surveyor with the policy titled Bed-Holds and Returns on 1/25/19. The policy read in part Prior to transfers and therapeutic leaves, residents or resident representatives will be informed in writing of the bed-hold and return policy.
No further information was provided prior to the exit conference on 1/28/19.
4. The facility staff failed to provide Resident #25 and the resident representative written information about bed-hold when the resident was transferred to the hospital 1/11/19.
The clinical record of Resident #25 was reviewed 1/23/19 through 1/28/19. Resident #25 was admitted to the facility 2/10/18 and readmitted [DATE] with diagnoses that included but not limited to acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, hypothyroidism, hypercholesterolemia, major depressive disorder, hypertension, acute bronchitis, repeated falls, hyperlipidemia, pressure ulcer stage 2 right buttock, and discitis.
Resident #25's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 11/21/18 assessed the resident with a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) as 15/15.
The clinical record revealed a telephone order dated 1/11/19 that read May send out to ER (emergency room) (name of hospital omitted) for eval (evaluation)/tx (treatment) d/t (due to) fall & c/o (complaints of) pain.
The surveyor reviewed the 1/11/19 6:07 p.m. departmental note. The note read in part: @1728 (5:28 p.m.) staff stated that resident was in the floor. Resident was observed to be laying on his left side on the left side of the bed. Blood was coming from resident's head and left forearm. Pressure was held onto (sic) bleeding areas. 911 was called for transport. Resident stated that his left hip, left shoulder and head was hurting. Unable to do neuro checks due to resident's refusal. MD (medical doctor) and RP (responsible party) aware. Rescue squad arrived x3 attendants. Resident was assisted onto the stretcher x3 attendants and 2 employees. Resident left the facility at this time. Report was called to ER (emergency room) (name omitted).
The departmental note failed to have evidence of information that Resident #25 bed hold information was offered to the resident and the resident representative.
The surveyor informed the administrator, the director of nursing and the corporate registered nurse of the above concern during the end of the day meeting on 1/24/19 at 4:14 p.m. The survey team asked what information was provided when residents are transferred to the hospital. The director of nursing stated the face sheet and the medication administration record (MAR). The DON stated the nurses usually offer a bed hold when the residents are transferred. The DON was asked if this information should be documented in the clinical record. The DON stated the nurses should document when bed holds are offered in the clinical record.
No further information was provided prior to the exit conference on 1/28/19.
5. There were four other residents who were transferred to hospitals and the facility staff failed to provide written bed hold information to the resident and the resident representative. Those residents were identified as Resident #83, Resident #36, Resident #115, and Resident #69.
The survey team met with the administrator, the director of nursing (DON) and the corporate registered nurse on 1/24/19 at 4:14 p.m. and during the meeting asked what information was provided to the receiving provider when transferred to the hospital. The DON stated the face sheet and the medication administration record were sent. The DON stated the nurses usually offer a bed hold when the residents are transferred. The DON was asked if this information should be documented in the clinical record. The DON stated the nurses should document when bed holds are offered in the clinical record.
The director of nursing provided the surveyor with the policy titled Bed-Holds and Returns on 1/25/19. The policy read in part Prior to transfers and therapeutic leaves, residents or resident representatives will be informed in writing of the bed-hold and return policy.
No further information was provided prior to the exit conference on 1/28/19.