AUGUST HEALTHCARE AT RICHMOND

1503 MICHAEL ROAD, RICHMOND, VA 23229 (804) 288-6245
For profit - Corporation 32 Beds SIMCHA HYMAN & NAFTALI ZANZIPER Data: November 2025 1 Immediate Jeopardy citation
Trust Grade
33/100
#173 of 285 in VA
Last Inspection: April 2022

Over 2 years since last inspection. Current conditions may differ from available data.

Overview

August Healthcare at Richmond has received a trust grade of F, indicating significant concerns about the quality of care provided. Ranking #173 out of 285 facilities in Virginia places it in the bottom half, and #4 out of 11 in Henrico County shows that there are only three local options considered better. While the facility has been improving over time, with the number of issues decreasing from 12 in 2021 to 7 in 2022, there are still important concerns to consider. Staffing is a relative strength, with a good rating of 4 out of 5 stars and a turnover rate of 46%, which is slightly below the state average. However, there have been serious incidents, including failures to prevent abuse and to identify and treat critical pressure wounds, which raises concerns about resident safety. Overall, while there are some positive aspects, families should weigh these against the facility's serious deficiencies.

Trust Score
F
33/100
In Virginia
#173/285
Bottom 40%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Getting Better
12 → 7 violations
Staff Stability
⚠ Watch
46% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
Penalties
✓ Good
No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Virginia facilities.
Skilled Nurses
✓ Good
Each resident gets 44 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than average for Virginia. RNs are trained to catch health problems early.
Violations
⚠ Watch
19 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Overall Rating
★★★★☆
4.0
Staff Levels
★★★★☆
4.0
Care Quality
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2021: 12 issues
2022: 7 issues

The Good

  • 4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
  • 4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, fire safety.

The Bad

2-Star Overall Rating

Below Virginia average (3.0)

Below average - review inspection findings carefully

Staff Turnover: 46%

Near Virginia avg (46%)

Higher turnover may affect care consistency

Chain: SIMCHA HYMAN & NAFTALI ZANZIPER

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

The Ugly 19 deficiencies on record

1 life-threatening 2 actual harm
Apr 2022 7 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0584)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, Resident interview, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide a homelike environment for one Resident (Resident #20) in a sample size of 1...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, Resident interview, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide a homelike environment for one Resident (Resident #20) in a sample size of 15 Residents. For Resident #20, the facility staff failed to ensure Resident #20 had easy access to his bathroom sink. The findings included: On 04/05/2022 at 10:15 A.M., Resident #20 was observed seated in his wheelchair self-propelling in his room. When asked if he had any concerns about the care he receives at the facility, Resident #20 stated that his concern is that he cannot get to his sink while seated in his wheelchair. Resident #20 then stated that there was a bar in the way. This surveyor observed that the commode and sink were side by side on the left wall upon entry to the bathroom. In between the commode and the sink, there was an L-shaped bar attached to the wall, extending out the length of the commode and bolted into the floor. There was a side bar that extended into the pathway of the sink and was also bolted to the floor. On 04/06/2022 at 1:55 P.M., Resident #20 was observed seated in his wheelchair self-propelling in his room. A follow-up interview with Resident #20 was conducted. When asked how he would brush his teeth or wash up in the morning, Resident #20 stated that staff provide a pink basin for him and put it on his tray table. Resident #20 then self-propelled into the bathroom to demonstrate how he could not fit the wheelchair into the space between the side bar and the wall to access the sink. On 04/06/2022 at 2:20 P.M., Certified Nursing Assistant E (CNA E) was interviewed. CNA E verified she assisted Resident #20 this morning with set up for brushing teeth. When asked how that was done, CNA E stated that she filled a basin and placed it on the tray table and put it in front of him. When asked why Resident #20 did not use the bathroom sink, CNA E stated another Resident who shares the bathroom with Resident #20 was using the bathroom at the time. On 04/06/2022 at 3:35 P.M., this surveyor and Employee H, the Maintenance Director, entered Resident #20's room. Resident #20 again stated he couldn't get to his sink. The Maintenance Director measured Resident #20's wheelchair width to be 26.5 inches and the distance between the side bar and the wall in the bathroom to be 26.5 inches. Upon exiting the room, the Maintenance Director stated that it needed to be fixed and that it was an easy fix. On 04/06/2022, Resident #20's clinical record was reviewed. Resident #20's most recent Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 03/14/2022 was coded as an admission assessment. The Brief Interview for Mental Status was coded as 13 out of 15 indicative of intact cognition. On 04/06/2022 at approximately 4:00 P.M., the administrator was notified of findings. On 04/07/2022 at approximately 10:15 A.M., Resident #20 was observed seated in his wheelchair self-propelling in his room. When asked about accessing the bathroom sink, Resident #20 stated he was now able to access his sink and demonstrated ability to self-propel to the bathroom sink. This surveyor observed the side bar had been removed to widen the space.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on staff interviews, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to provide treatment and services to one Resident (Resident #27) in a survey sample of 1...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on staff interviews, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to provide treatment and services to one Resident (Resident #27) in a survey sample of 15 Residents. For Resident #27, the facility staff failed to solicit assistance from the facility management and medical director for treatment orders for a Resident with pneumonia on two occasions, when the attending physician was not responsive, which resulted in a delay in treatment. Past non-compliance was achieved on 2/28/22. The findings included: On 4/5/22 and 4/6/22, a closed clinical record review was conducted for Resident #27. This review revealed a delay in treatment for pneumonia on two occasions. The details are as follows: * On 11/24/21, Resident #27 exhibited abnormal bilateral lung sounds. A chest x-ray was ordered. * On 11/25/21 at 10:35 AM, the results of the chest x-ray were received and showed a left base infiltrate and/or small effusion. Nursing notes showed that the facility staff attempted to reach the attending physician and nurse practitioner throughout the day. However, no attempts were made to notify the medical director that the attending physician was not responding, in an effort to obtain treatment orders for Resident #27's infection. * On 11/26/21 at 4:50 PM, [two days after symptom onset], the facility nursing staff spoke with the attending physician and obtained treatment orders which included an antibiotic and nebulizer treatments. * On 1/12/22, Resident #27 was noted to have abnormal lung sounds and increased congestion. A chest x-ray was ordered. On 1/12/22 at 10:44 PM, the chest x-ray results were received and noted possible bilateral pneumonia. Nursing notes showed that the facility staff attempted to reach the attending physician but were not successful. * On 1/13/22 at 6:34 AM, attempts to reach the attending physician were again unsuccessful. There was no indication that the facility nursing staff notified facility management or medical director in an effort to obtain treatment orders for Resident #27. * On 1/13/22 at 1:15 PM, the facility staff obtained treatment orders for an antibiotic from the attending physician for Resident #27. On 4/6/22 at 12:42 PM, an interview was conducted with LPN B. LPN B confirmed that if a Resident had a change in condition she would continue to call the provider until she got a response. On 4/6/22 at 12:30 PM, and again at 3:17 PM, the attending physician for Resident #27 was attempted to be reached via telephone, but the calls were not successful. On 4/6/22 at 3:44 PM, an interview was conducted with Employee G, an RN. She stated that she tended to get a better response from the nurse practitioner than the attending physician for Resident #27, but neither of them were fantastic, they didn't have an on-call service and there were times they weren't reaching back out timely. It was a challenge. Employee G said if it was an excess of 24 hours, That's when you would reach out to the Administrator, Director of Nursing and Medical Director. On 4/6/22 at 6:11 PM, an interview was conducted with LPN D. LPN D stated that frequently she would attempt to call the attending physician and nurse practitioner and would not have an option to leave a message and would have to call multiple times to get a response. LPN D stated it was pretty common to go an entire shift without a response. A review was performed of the facility policy titled, Prohibition of Abuse. This policy stated, .The facility promotes the Rights of Residents to be free from verbal, sexual, physical, and mental abuse, including involuntary seclusion, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of property . Neglect - is the failure of the facility, its employees or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress. A review was performed of the facility policy titled, Attending Physician/Provider Responsibilities. This policy read, .Ensuring Adequate Ongoing Coverage: 1. The Attending Physician/Provider will designate an alternate physician or another appropriately licensed practitioner to respond in an appropriate, timely manner in case the Attending Physician is unavailable. The Medical Director will respond to all residents' medical issues if facility is unable to reach Attending Physician/Provider. On 4/6/22, during an end of day meeting, the facility Administrator and Director of Nursing were made aware of the findings. On 4/7/22, during the review of the facility Quality Assurance (QA) Program, the facility Administrator indicated they had identified a concern with the facility staff not reaching out to the Medical Director when the attending physician was not responsive in January 2022. The facility held an ad hoc QA meeting on 1/26/22, and initiated a root cause analysis and plan of correction which was completed 2/28/22. The plan of correction included: Primary MD (medical doctor) not responding to calls, Medical Director to be notified 30 minutes after calling primary MD without response. All Residents have the potential to be affected. The Director of Nursing or designee to educate licensed nurses to notify the Medical Director when Primary Care MD does not respond within 30 minutes. The Director of Nursing/designee to monitor the licensed nurses calling Medical Director when Primary MD does not respond monthly x 2 months. Findings to be reported to QAPI (Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement) committee monthly and updated as indicated. The education of licensed nurses was reviewed. The monthly audits were reviewed. On 4/7/22 at 10:30 AM, an interview was conducted with LPN C, to validate the past non-compliance. LPN C said that if she was not able to reach the doctor or didn't get a return call within 30 minutes, she would call the medical director. LPN C confirmed she was trained on this about a month or two ago. No further information was received/provided.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Respiratory Care (Tag F0695)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, Resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to provide needed care and treatment for one Resident (R...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, Resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to provide needed care and treatment for one Resident (Resident #22) in a sample size of 15 Residents. Specifically, the facility staff failed to ensure Resident #22's oxygen was humidified on 04/06/2022. The findings included: On 04/06/2022 at approximately 9:55 A.M., this surveyor observed Resident #22 approach Licensed Practical Nurse B in the hall and stated that she had been waiting over 24 hours for someone to fill her water bottle. LPN B apologized and stated she would get her water. Resident #22 then stated that 24 hours is too long to wait for water. At approximately 10:10 A.M., Resident #22 was observed seated in her chair in her room. Resident #22 had oxygen set at 2 liters per minute via nasal cannula (the tubing was dated 04/04/22). The humidified reservoir was empty. When asked about the empty reservoir, Resident #22 indicated that she had COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) and stated If there's no water in there, it causes my coughing to be worse and makes my throat so dry. Resident #22 went on to explain that About this time yesterday she told one of the aides the bottle needed to be refilled and she said she would tell the nurse. Resident #22 stated around dinnertime she told a different aide and the aide said she would tell my nurse. Then a third person came around and I told them, too. Resident #22 stated that every time she saw an aide she would tell her the bottle needed to be refilled and the aide would say she would tell the nurse. LPN B then entered the room and filled the reservoir with distilled water. Resident #22 continued and stated that I didn't have a good night because I was coughing; my throat was so dry and I felt choked. LPN B then stated I was in here several times yesterday and you didn't say anything to me. Resident #22 then indicated that when her oxygen is not humidified, she finds it is hard to focus. Resident #22 then began to cry. LPN B stepped close to Resident #22 and comforted her. At approximately 10:25 A.M., Resident #22 was no longer crying when LPN B and this surveyor exited the room. LPN B then stated that when [Resident #22] gets angry or frustrated, she will cry. When asked about the humidified reservoir, LPN B stated that she saw water in the reservoir when she came on her shift yesterday [morning of 04/05/2022]. On 04/06/2022 at 10:35 A.M., Certified Nursing Assistant C (CNA C) was interviewed. CNA C verified she worked on the day shift on 04/05/2022. When asked if she had any interaction with (Resident #22), CNA C stated that she was not assigned to care for Resident #22 yesterday and didn't have any interaction with (Resident #22) yesterday. On 04/06/2022 at 10:45 A.M., Certified Nursing Assistant D (CNA D) was interviewed. CNA D confirmed she was assigned to care for Resident #22 on 04/05/2022 and this day 04/06/2022. When asked about Resident #22 CNA D stated that [Resident #22] is not a morning person and I asked her if she wanted breakfast about 10:30 [A.M.]. When asked about the water in her humidifier, CNA D stated it was a little over half full at breakfast time yesterday. When asked if Resident #22 requested the bottle be refilled, CNA D stated that [Resident #22] didn't say anything about her humidifier. When asked if there was water in the humidifier this morning, CNA D indicated that the machine was on but she did not take note if there was water in the humidifier reservoir. On 04/06/2022, Resident #22's clinical record was reviewed. Resident #22's most recent Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 03/17/2022 was coded as a quarterly assessment. The Brief Interview for Mental Status was coded as 15 out of 15 indicative of intact cognition. Resident #22's care plan was reviewed. A focus dated 10/08/2019 entitled, [Resident #22] has oxygen therapy r/t [related to] COPD included but was not limited to the following intervention with a revision date of 06/21/2021: Administer O2 [oxygen] via nasal prongs/mask at 2L [2 liters per minute] continuously. Humidification of oxygen was not addressed on the care plan. On 04/06/2022 at 4:45 P.M., the administrator and Director of Nursing (DON) were notified of findings. When asked about the expectation of oxygen humidification reservoirs, the DON indicated that the nurses should be checking to make sure the reservoirs remain adequately filled. On 04/07/2022, the facility staff provided a copy of their policy entitled, Oxygen Concentrator/Oxygen Utilization. An excerpt under the section entitled, The facility may perform some functions to maintain adequate flow of oxygen via device to include: In [sic] oxygen device have humidifier application, ensure humidifier bottle has distill [sic] water present at appropriate level. On 04/07/2022, the Director of Nursing provided an updated copy of the care plan. Under the focus dated 10/08/2019 entitled, [Resident #22] has oxygen therapy r/t [related to] COPD included but was not limited to the following intervention with a revision date of 04/07/2022: Administer O2 [oxygen] via nasal [sic] at 2L [2 liters per minute] continuously with humidification. On 04/07/2022 at approximately 1:00 P.M., the administrator stated there was no further information or documentation to submit.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0658 (Tag F0658)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on staff interviews, facility documentation review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to follow profes...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on staff interviews, facility documentation review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to follow professional standards of practice for one Resident (Resident #27) in a survey sample of 15 Residents. For Resident #27, the facility staff failed to notify the physician when a medication was not available. The findings included: On 4/5/22 and 4/6/22, a closed clinical record review was conducted for Resident #27. This review revealed: On 11/26/21 at 4:50 PM, the facility nursing staff spoke with the attending physician and obtained treatment orders which included an antibiotic and nebulizer treatments. On 1/4/22-1/10/22, Resident #27 missed 7 consecutive days of his nebulizer treatment doses, due to the medication not being available. There was no indication in the clinical chart that the physician had been notified of the unavailability to assess if alternate treatments were needed. A review was performed of the facility policy titled, Change in Condition/Notification of Physician & Responsible Party. This policy read, The facility will immediately inform the Resident, consult with the resident's physician, and notify responsible party/appointed guardian when there is: .*A significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status (that is, a deterioration in health, mental or psychosocial status in either life-threatening conditions or clinical complications) .A need to alter treatment significantly . On 4/6/22, during an end of day meeting, the facility Administrator and Director of Nursing were made aware of the findings. The Director of Nursing stated the facility follows [NAME] for professional standards of practice for nursing services. [NAME]'s Manual of Nursing Practice Eighth Edition, addresses on pages 13-14 Examples of Ethical Dilemmas and Possible Responses. This document read, .Nonresponse by Physician. Page 17 discusses, The Standards of Professional Nursing Practice and stated, Standards of professional performance include Resource Utilization. Page 18 read, Common Legal Claims for Departure from Standards of Care: Failure to communicate or document a significant change in a patient's condition to appropriate professional. Failure to administer medications properly and in a timely fashion, or to report and administer omitted doses appropriately. No further information was received/provided.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0727 (Tag F0727)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, and in the course of a complaint investigation, the facility staff failed to provide Registered Nurse coverage 8 consecutive hours ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, and in the course of a complaint investigation, the facility staff failed to provide Registered Nurse coverage 8 consecutive hours per day for 3 days out of 30 days in June 2021 and for 6 days out of 31 days in July 2021. The findings include: Facility staff failed to provide Registered Nurse (RN) coverage in June 2021 on 6/11, 6/21, 6/30, and in July 2021 on 7/14, 7/15, 7/16, 7/17, 7/28, and 7/31. On 4/5/22, an interview was conducted with Employee F who confirmed he was responsible for payroll records at the facility. A copy of the payroll records for all Registered Nurses (RNs), Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs), and Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs), to include time clocked in and out, for the months of June 2021 and July 2021 was requested and provided by Employee F who verified the records were accurate and complete. On 4/6/22, a review of the payroll records revealed the following: For June 2021, there was no RN coverage on 6/11, there was partial RN coverage for 6.75 hours on 6/21, and no RN coverage on 6/30. For July 2021, there was no RN coverage for 7/14 and 7/15, there was partial RN coverage for 3.75 hours on 7/16, no RN coverage for 7/17, no RN coverage on 7/28, and partial RN coverage for 4.5 hours on 7/31. On 4/6/22, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON) who stated, it is facility practice for all nursing staff, including the DON, to use the timeclock when coming to work and when leaving. Review of the payroll records confirmed several timeclockings for the DON concurrently with other facility RNs. No further information was provided.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pharmacy Services (Tag F0755)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on staff interviews, facility documentation review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to administer medications due to a lack of availability on 11 occasions, to one Resident...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on staff interviews, facility documentation review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to administer medications due to a lack of availability on 11 occasions, to one Resident (Resident #27) in a survey sample of 15 Residents. The findings included: On 4/5/22, Surveyor B conducted a clinical record review for Resident #27. This review revealed a physician order dated 11/27/21, that read, Xopenex Nebulization Solution 0.63 MG/3ML (Levalbuterol HCl) 1 vial inhale orally via nebulizer two times a day for Pneumonia. Review of the MAR (medication administration record) revealed that Resident #27 did not receive this medication as prescribed on 11 occasions on the following dates: 11/28/21, 1/4/22, 1/5/22, 1/6/22, 1/7/22, 1/8/22, 1/9/22, and 1/10/22. Review of the nursing notes revealed entries that noted pending delivery and not available. There was no indication that the physician had been notified of the medication not being available to administer as per the physician order. On 4/6/22 and 4/7/22, interviews were conducted with LPN B, LPN C, LPN D, and Employee G, who is an RN and the facilities' infection preventionist. Each of the 4 nurses confirmed that the pharmacy makes two deliveries to the facility daily and there is a back-up pharmacy. If a medication is urgent or needed immediately, all four nurses said the pharmacy could send the prescription to a local pharmacy that could be picked up for immediate administration. On 4/6/22, the facility Administrator provided a copy of the STAT (emergency) box contents. This box is a supply of medications maintained on-hand at the facility that can be used in the event of an emergency or new order. Review of this document revealed that the Xopenex was not kept on-hand in the STAT box. Review of the facility policy titled, Medication Pass/Administration was reviewed. This policy read, .If any ordered medication is not available, call the physician to get an alternate substitute to administer or get an order from the physician to administer the unavailable medication at a time when it is available from the pharmacy. The physician will have to make a clinical judgement if the delay in the medication will have no impact in the resident quality of care . The facility policy titled, Medication Ordering was reviewed. This policy stated, .6. If any ordered medication is not available despite been ordered/reordered, call the physician to get an alternate substitute medication available in the emergency kit. The nurse may also get an order from the physician to administer the unavailable medication at a time when available from the pharmacy. The physician will have to make a clinical judgement if the delay in the medication administration will have no impact in the resident quality of care . On 4/6/22, during an end of day meeting, the facility Administrator and Director of Nursing were made aware that Resident #27 had a delay in receiving medications as ordered. No further information was received.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on staff interviews and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to maintain an active facility wide Infection Prevention Control Program (IPCP) with regards to infection surveil...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on staff interviews and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to maintain an active facility wide Infection Prevention Control Program (IPCP) with regards to infection surveillance and tracking for one Resident (Resident #27) in a survey sample of 15 Residents, but had the potential to affect multiple Residents within the facility. The findings included: On 4/5/22, during the survey entrance conference, the facility Administrator identified Employee G as the facility Infection Preventionist. The Administrator stated that Employee G was out on vacation, but they had access to all of her information and files, as well as Employee G being available via telephone. On 4/6/22, the facility Administrator submitted the infection line listing/infection surveillance for the months of November and December 2021, and January 2022. These documents were reviewed and noted that only Residents with infections being treated with antibiotics, were listed. It was also noted, that Resident #27's infection for pneumonia, which was treated with an antibiotic in January 2022, was not noted on the line listing. Also, Resident #27's episodes of watery stools on 12/29/21 and 12/31/21, had not been recorded on any of the infection tracking documents. On 4/6/22 at 3:44 PM, a telephone interview was conducted with Employee G, the infection preventionist. Employee G stated that she tracks infections when Residents are put on an antibiotic so she can monitor and it is also a visual cue if someone has been on an antibiotic multiple times, she can evaluate if there is a colonization issue, identify trends, etc. Employee G was asked if there is any reason why someone would be on an antibiotic and not on the infection surveillance/line listing. Employee G said, If it is an antibiotic following surgery, such as someone had cataract surgery and following that is on antibiotic eye drops, I wouldn't put them on there, or if it is treating something that is not a healthcare associated infection. Employee G was asked about a Resident having completed a course of antibiotics and then approximately two weeks later develops watery stools. Employee G said she would immediately think about C-diff [Clostridium difficile, an infection of the large intestine (colon) caused by the bacteria Clostridium difficile. Long-term use of antibiotics reduces the normal bacterial population in the intestine and triggers the C. difficile overgrowth in the intestine] which is highly contagious. Employee G was asked if she monitors systems such as this or gastro-intestinal virus symptoms such as noro-virus on a surveillance log, to identify potential infection outbreaks. Employee G said, No, but I see where that could be beneficial now that you mention it. Review of the facility policy titled, Surveillance for Infections was conducted. This policy read, The Infection Preventionist (IP) will conduct ongoing surveillance for Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAIs) and other epidemiologically significant infections that have substantial impact on potential resident outcome and that may require transmission-based precautions and other preventative interventions .The resident line list and staff line list should contain relevant data which will help tracking, contact tracing and disease analysis. The facility staff submitted evidence that Employee G completed the CDC Nursing Home Infection Preventionist Training Course. In module 4 of this training the CDC stated, The purpose of infection surveillance is to identify infections and to monitor adherence to recommended IPC (Infection Prevention and Control) practices in order to reduce infections and prevent the spread of pathogens among residents, staff, and visitors. An IPC program uses surveillance data to: Monitor trends in infections and pathogens, including detecting outbreaks. Monitor staff adherence to IPC practices. Identify performance improvement opportunities. Track progress toward priorities identified on the annual facility IPC risk assessment and inform the development of future risk assessments. On 4/7/22, the Administrator and Director of Nursing were made aware of the findings. On 4/7/22, the facility Administrator shared with the survey team, that she had previously discussed the surveillance and tracking of infections and symptoms with Employee G and didn't know why this wasn't being done. No further information was provided by the facility.
Feb 2021 12 deficiencies 1 IJ
CRITICAL (J)

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Abuse Prevention Policies (Tag F0607)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 3. For Resident #5, the facility staff failed to implement their abuse policy when an injury of unknown source was identified on...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 3. For Resident #5, the facility staff failed to implement their abuse policy when an injury of unknown source was identified on 01/12/2021. Resident #5, a [AGE] year old female, was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #5 included but were not limited to atherosclerosis and peripheral vascular disease. Resident #5's most recent Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 01/06/2021 was coded as an annual assessment. The Brief Interview for Mental Status was coded as 99 meaning unable to complete the interview. Cognitive Skills for Daily Decision Making were coded as moderately impaired. Short-term and Long-term memories were coded as memory problem. Functional status for bed mobility and transfers were coded as requiring extensive assistance from staff. On 02/11/2021 at approximately 8:45 A.M., the clinical record was reviewed. A nurse's note dated 01/12/2021 at 6:46 A.M. documented, Note Text: cna reported to writer that she noted discoloration to right hand between 2nd and 3rd fingers, denies pain will continue to monitor the area. The subsequent nurse's notes through 01/18/2021 at 2:26 P.M. were reviewed and the injury of unknown origin to the right hand was not addressed. A nursing skin assessment dated [DATE] at 4:03 P.M. did not document a skin issue on the right hand as indicated in the nurse's note dated 01/12/2021. On 02/12/2021 at approximately 9:20 A.M., a copy of the facility-reported incident and the investigation documentation associated with this injury of unknown origin to the right hand were requested. On 02/12/2021 at approximately 11:15 A.M., an interview with the Director of Nursing was conducted. When asked about a facility-reported incident and the investigation documentation associated with this injury of unknown origin, the Director of Nursing stated that it was not reported investigated or reported to the state agency. The Director of Nursing stated the staff were re-educated and a facility-reported incident will be sent to the state agency. When asked about expectation from staff when an injury of unknown origin is discovered, the Director of Nursing stated the expectation is that the nurse report it as soon as possible so we can send in a FRI [facility-reported incident] and begin the investigation. The Director of Nursing also stated the expectation includes assessing and interviewing residents and staff associated with the injury and notify all the proper people and the doctor. The facility staff provided a copy of their policy entitled, Abuse, Neglect, Mistreatment and Misappropriation of Resident Property. In Section E entitled, Investigation under the header Abuse Policy Requirements, it was documented, It is the policy of the Home that reports of abuse (mistreatment, neglect, or abuse, including injuries of unknown source, exploitation and misappropriation of property) are promptly and thoroughly investigated. In Section E, Part 2 and subpart (a), it was documented, Investigation of injuries of Unknown Origin or Suspicious injuries: must be immediately investigated to rule out abuse: (a) Injuries include but are not limited to, bruising of the inner thigh, chest, face, and breast, bruises of an unusual size, multiple unexplained bruises, and/or bruising in an area not typically vulnerable to trauma. In Section G entitled, Reporting and Response under the header, Abuse Policy Requirements, an excerpt documented, It is the policy of this Home that abuse allegations (abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of Resident property) are reported per Federal and State law. In summary, Resident #5 had an injury of unknown source to her right hand between the 2nd and 3rd fingers (identified on 01/12/2021) and the facility staff failed to implement their abuse policy to report and investigate the matter. On 02/12/2021 at approximately 1:45 P.M., the administrator and Director of Nursing were notified of findings. Based on interview, clinical record review and facility documentation the facility staff failed to implement policies and procedures related to abuse and neglect for 3 Residents (#15, #13, and #5), in a survey sample of 17 Residents. Immediate Jeopardy was called on 2/10/21 at 3:26 P.M. related to Residents #15 and #13. It was abated on 2/12/21 at 5:30 P.M. After Immediate Jeopardy was removed, the deficiency was assigned a Scope and Severity of level 2, isolated. The findings included: 1. For Resident #15, the facility did not implement facility policies and procedures by allowing LPN A to continue to work with Resident #15 after being accused of abusing Resident #15 and written up for Intimidating a Resident [#15] Resident #15 an [AGE] year old woman, was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of but not limited to dementia without behavioral disturbance, anemia, chronic kidney disease, anxiety, major depressive disorder, falls, and atherosclerotic heart disease. Resident #15's most recent MDS (minimum data set) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 12/21/20, an quarterly assessment, coded Resident #15 as having a BIMS (brief interview of mental status) score of 10 out of a possible 15. This score indicates moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS codes the resident as needing extensive assistance with physical assistance of 1 person for toileting, hygiene, dressing and bed mobility. She requires limited assistance with physical assistance of 1 person for walking in room, and transfers. She requires supervision for eating meals. The Resident uses a walker to aid in mobility. On 2/9/21 approximately 1:00 PM Resident #15 was asked about abuse and neglect in the facility, she stated There was one aide that wasn't nice but I told her to leave. She hasn't been around lately. On 2/10/20 during clinical record review it was discovered that the following entry was made in the progress notes: 1/1/21 at 9:18 PM - At 430 PM [Resident #15 name redacted] came out from her room and was ambulating with her rollator. She passed by the nurse's station and stated 'Someone banged my face and head in the bars this morning.' Writer asked if she can recall the name of the person and she stated 'I don't know.' On 2/10/21 at 11:41 an interview was conducted with the DON and the Administrator who was asked about an incident involving Resident #15 and LPN A. The Administrator stated it happened when she was out sick. She stated that The DON called me at home. When asked what day she was notified she stated she wasn't sure. She also stated 2 CNA's that work night shift reported the incident. When asked who they reported it to she stated They called me at home. I told the DON to do the investigation. The Administrator submitted a Corrective Action Plan for LPN A excerpts are as follows: Employee Name: [redacted] Department: Nursing Date: 1/28/21 Date of Occurrence: 1/1/21 Location: Nursing Time: 11 pm -7 am Action Taken: Written Counseling Description of Issue: [box checked] Policy Violation [box checked] other: Mental Intimidation. Explanation: It was reported to Acting DON by Administrator on 1/6/21 of an incident involving resident # [medical record number redacted] on the morning of 1/1/21. The report stated that Resident was refusing care which was reported to the Charge Nurse, [LPN A name redacted]. At that time, Charge Nurse and CNA both went in to care for Resident. Per report, Resident continued to be resistant to care and Charge Nurse began to pull down Residents clothes while Resident was in bed and was speaking to Resident in a loud and uncalm voice. When Charge Nurse was pulling Resident's clothes off, the bed was unlocked on one side and began to move with the headboard hitting the wall. Charge Nurse locked the bed and continued pulling clothes off, kicking the soiled depends and clothing on the floor at which time she was bumping or hitting the walker and rocking chair with her feet which in turn was hitting the wall and the furniture in the Resident's room. Resident yelled at Charge Nurse to stop and Charge Nurse responded that they were there to help her and she was fighting them and telling them that they were hitting her furniture. Charge Nurse then stated This is how we hit furniture and grabbed the walker or the rocking chair and was hitting it against the wall or the china dresser. CNA approached the Resident and took over washing her up and changing her clothes and Charge Nurse exited the room, however she was still talking to the Resident in a loud and Unocal manner. Per CNA, Resident at this time was reported to be shaking and walked outside of her room and sat in recliner on the unit. Another staff member came to see what all the loud voices was about and to see if everything was okay. The Charge Nurse said everything was Okay. On the night of 1/2/21 staff reported that when they knocked on the Resident's door, Resident jumped, seemed scared and was shaking. She reported to the staff that 'the black woman with the round thing on her head' came into her room and kept hitting her head on the wall. At a later time that same night Resident reported the same thing and also said ' I think it was T, (which is what she calls the Charge Nurse), but why would she do that?' At a later time, a staff member stated that Resident approached her and stated the night nurse [name redacted], who wears that knot on her head, hit her in the arm and the head. The staff member asked when that happened and was told it happened a few nights ago and that the nurse was hitting and kicking her bed and throwing her chair around. Staff also reports that Resident has been telling other people who will listen to her, including her family, that she was hit and kicked by the night nurse, [name redacted], and that she did not want to stay at [facility name redacted] anymore because she might be killed. It was noted that the Corrective Action Plan had not been signed by the DON or the LPN. The DON was asked about why the document had not been signed and she stated The LPN has been out of the facility on Administrative Leave. When asked was that due to this incident she stated, Yes I believe so. On 2/10/21 a review of the time clock punches for LPN A revealed that LPN A continued to work on the very same unit with the Resident until 2/1/21. On this date she was written up for Sleeping on the job. On 2/10/21 at approximately 3:00 PM an interview was conducted with the Administrator and she was asked if the LPN A was still an employee there and she stated that she is supposed to come in on Thursday (2/11/21) to sign the corrective action plan. The Administrator was then asked to provide the survey team with the entire investigation including witness statements. The witness statement from CNA C was reviewed and an excerpt is as follows: 1/14/21 - The incident started when I was cleaning and sanitizing the shower room, when I heard people screaming and yelling, so I immediately ran out and saw the nurse [LPN name redacted] standing at the opening of room [ROOM NUMBER], which is [Resident #15 name redacted] room. The nurse was leaning on the resident's door and the resident was standing inside with her walker extended out in front of the nurse and her aide [CNA name redacted] behind her. I asked them was everything okay and the nurse said yes. When I was emptying my soiled linen cart the resident came to me and said the night nurse, [name redacted], who wear that knot on her head, hit her in the arm and head. I asked her when did this happen she said a few nights ago & the nurse was hitting and kicking her bed and throwing her chair around. I reported this to [Administrator name redacted] and she said she will report it to [DON name redacted] to investigate it, as time went by almost 2 weeks, I heard nothing, so I then called Mother and she stated she had heard something about it and she will look into it better. I wasn't sure if anyone was looking into the matter. [Resident #15 name redacted] was telling anyone including her family, who will listen to her, that she was hit and kicked by the night nurse, and that she didn't want to stay at [facility name redacted] anymore because she might be killed. A review of the Abuse and Neglect Policy read: Page 9 Paragraph F Protection Abuse Policy Requirements: It is the policy of this HOME that the resident(s) will be protected from the alleged offender(s). Procedure: Immediately upon receiving a report of alleged abuse, the Administrator, and / or designee will coordinate delivery of appropriate medical and or psychological care and attention. Ensuring safety and wellbeing for the vulnerable individual are of utmost priority. Safety, security and support of the Resident, their roommate, if applicable and other Residents with the potential to be affected will be provided. This should include as appropriate: 1. Procedures must be in place to provide the Resident with a safe, protected environment during the investigation. a. The alleged perpetrator will immediately be removed and the Resident protected. Employees accused of alleged abuse will be immediately removed from the Home and will remain removed pending the results of a thorough investigation. (Decision of the extent of immediate disciplinary action will be made by the Administrator and/or designee). 2. For Resident #13 LPN B failed to implement facility policies and procedures by not immediately reporting an allegation of abuse. Resident # 13 a [AGE] year old woman, was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of but not limited to hypertension, malignant neoplasm of pancreas, diabetes, UTI, prosthetic heart valve, and age related macular degeneration. Resident #13's most recent MDS (minimum data set) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 12/4/20, an annual assessment, coded Resident #13 as having a BIMS (brief interview of mental status) score of 14 out of a possible 15. This score indicates no cognitive impairment. The MDS codes the resident as needing extensive assistance with all aspects of ADL care with the exception of eating. Resident #13 is able to feed herself with only supervision. The Resident uses a walker for aid in short distance mobility and a wheelchair for longer distances. On 2/10/21 at approximately 10:00 AM Surveyor C reported the following observation. At 9:20 AM Resident #13 was in wheel chair next to the medication cart. Resident #13 stated Somebody kicked me. LPN C asked Who kicked you? Resident replied I don't know. LPN C assisted the Resident to lift her right pant leg to reveal a dressing on right shin. LPN C then stated to the resident No one kicked you and went on to tell Resident that she had a dressing on her shin from a skin tear. Another staff member then approached Resident and rolled her down the hall in wheel chair. At 10:40 AM, Surveyor B interviewed Resident #13 after she returned from physical therapy. The Resident was asked about the injury to her right shin and she stated Somebody kicked me, I don't remember who. When asked about abuse or neglect she stated I cannot stand that nurse from last night we had a fight. When asked what happened she stated I can't stand her she is rude and she just would not leave me alone, so we got into a fight. She is not a good nurse and she drops stuff and then picks it up off the floor and gives it to you. That's not sanitary or wise these days. She has no patience. I was kicking at her to get her to leave me alone. They know I don't like her and don't want her in my room. On 2/10/21 a review of the clinical record revealed the following progress note: 2/10/21 at 12:59 AM - Resident call bell was on, and staff went to answer the call bell, resident stated she want to go to BR, staff got resident up in the w/c and assisted resident to the bathroom and while assisting resident back to bed she refused to allow staff to apply pillow under her legs and was insisting on keeping her legs outside the bed sa [sic] staff was assisting to put the legs back to bed resident became physically aggressive and started kicking and swinging at staff was verbally aabusive [sic] and told staff she hate her, redirected and assured resident that staff is here to help and to assure her safety. On 2/10/21 at approximately 10:58 AM an interview was conducted with the Administrator who was asked if she was aware of an allegation of abuse by Resident #13. She stated that she had not heard of this but would start an investigation. Immediate Jeopardy was called on 2/10/21 at 3:26 PM, and the Administrator was notified. Immediate Jeopardy Abatement Plan is as follows: All staff on evening shift, 3pm-11pm, for 2/10/21 will be in -serviced on Resident Rights and Abuse and Neglect on 2/10/21. Staff for night shift, 11pm -7 am, will be in serviced before their shift on 2/10/21. Dayshift staff will be in-serviced before their shift on 2/11/21. There will be a mandatory all staff meeting on 2/11/21 at 12 noon for training on Resident's Rights and Abuse and Neglect. All afore-mentioned staff will be provided a copy of the homes policy regarding Resident Rights and Abuse and Neglect at the time of the meeting. All other staff will be trained over the phone or in person before working with residents. LPN B has been removed from schedule and statement requested from this person regarding incident with Resident #13 on 2/10/21. Per policy, LPN B will remain removed pending the results of a thorough investigation and disciplinary action will be made by the Administrator. LPN C has been called for a statement about her conversation with Resident #13 this morning 2/10/21. She has provided documentation of the incident with Resident #13 on 2/10/21. Interviewing every Nursing Resident (24 total) to determine if any abuse, neglect, or resident rights violations have occurred. This has been completed by 2/10/21 by 445 pm. Body checks will be completed by 10 AM on 2/11/21 for cognitively impaired residents. The Abatement Plan will be completed by 4PM on 2/11/21 The survey team verified education in service sheet checks, interviews, and completed skin assessments were reviewed. The Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 2/12/21 at 5:30 PM.
SERIOUS (G)

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, clinical record review and facility documentation the faintly staff failed to ensure Residents ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, clinical record review and facility documentation the faintly staff failed to ensure Residents were free from abuse for 1 Resident (# 15) in a survey sample of 17 Residents. This is harm. The findings included: 1. For Resident #15 the facility failed to prevent abuse. This is harm. Resident #15 an [AGE] year old woman, was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of but not limited to dementia without behavioral disturbance, anemia, chronic kidney disease, anxiety, major depressive disorder, falls, and atherosclerotic heart disease. Resident #15's most recent MDS (minimum data set) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 12/21/20, an quarterly assessment, coded Resident #15 as having a BIMS (brief interview of mental status) score of 10 out of a possible 15. This score indicates moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS codes the resident as needing extensive assistance with physical assistance of 1 person for toileting, hygiene, dressing and bed mobility. She requires limited assistance with physical assistance of 1 person for walking in room, and transfers. She requires supervision for eating meals. The Resident uses a walker to aid in mobility. On 2/9/21 approximately 1:00 PM Resident #15 was asked about abuse and neglect in the facility, she stated There was one aide that wasn't nice but I told her to leave. She hasn't been around lately. On 2/10/20 during clinical record review it was discovered that the following entry was made in the progress notes: 1/1/21 at 9:18 PM - At 430 PM [Resident #15 name redacted] came out from her room and was ambulating with her rollator. She passed by the nurse's station and stated 'Someone banged my face and head in the bars this morning.' Writer asked if she can recall the name of the person and she stated 'I don't know.' On 2/10/21 at 11:41 an interview was conducted with the DON and the Administrator who was asked about an incident involving Resident #15 and LPN A. The Administrator stated it happened when she was out sick with Covid. The DON called me at home. She stated 2 CNA's that work night shift reported the incident. When asked who they reported it, to her she stated They called me at home and I told the DON to do the investigation. The Administrator submitted a Corrective Action Plan for LPN A, excerpts are as follows: Employee Name: [redacted] Department: Nursing Date: 1/28/21 Date of Occurrence: 1/1/21 Location: Nursing Time: 11 pm -7 am Action Taken: Written Counseling Description of Issue: [box checked] Policy Violation [box checked] other: Mental Intimidation. Explanation: It was reported to Acting DON by Administrator on 1/6/21 of an incident involving resident # [medical record number redacted] on the morning of 1/1/21. The report stated that Resident was refusing care which was reported to the Charge Nurse, [LPN A name redacted]. At that time, Charge Nurse and CNA both went in to care for Resident. Per report, Resident continued to be resistant to care and Charge Nurse began to pull down Residents clothes while Resident was in bed and was speaking to Resident in a loud and uncalm voice. When Charge Nurse was pulling Resident's clothes off, the bed was unlocked on one side and began to move with the headboard hitting the wall. Charge Nurse locked the bed and continued pulling clothes off, kicking the soiled depends and clothing on the floor at which time she was bumping or hitting the walker and rocking chair with her feet which in turn was hitting the wall and the furniture in the Resident's room. Resident yelled at Charge Nurse to stop and Charge Nurse responded that they were there to help her and she was fighting them and telling them that they were hitting her furniture. Charge Nurse then stated This is how we hit furniture and grabbed the walker or the rocking chair and was hitting it against the wall or the china dresser. CNA approached the Resident and took over washing her up and changing her clothes and Charge Nurse exited the room, however she was still talking to the Resident in a loud and Unocal manner. Per CNA, Resident at this time was reported to be shaking and walked outside of her room and sat in recliner on the unit. Another staff member came to see what all the loud voices was about and to see if everything was okay. The Charge Nurse said everything was Okay. On the night of 1/2/21 staff reported that when they knocked on the Resident's door, Resident jumped, seemed scared and was shaking. She reported to the staff that 'the black woman with the round thing on her head' came into her room and kept hitting her head on the wall. At a later time that same night Resident reported the same thing and also said ' I think it was [name redacted], (which is what she calls the Charge Nurse), but why would she do that?' At a later time, a staff member stated that Resident approached her and stated the night nurse T, who wears that knot on her head, hit her in the arm and the head. The staff member asked when that happened and was told it happened a few nights ago and that the nurse was hitting and kicking her bed and throwing her chair around. Staff also reports that Resident has been telling other people who will listen to her, including her family, that she was hit and kicked by the night nurse, [name redacted], and that she did not want to stay at [facility name redacted] anymore because she might be killed. It was noted that the Corrective Action Plan had not been signed by the DON or the LPN. The DON was asked about why the document had not been signed and she stated The LPN has been out of the facility on Administrative Leave. When asked was that due to this incident she stated, Yes I believe so. On 2/10/21 a review of the time clock punches for LPN A revealed that LPN A continued to work on the very same unit with the Resident until 2/1/21 when she was written up for Sleeping on the job. On 2/10/21 at approximately 3:00 PM an interview was conducted with the Administrator and she was asked if the LPN A was still an employee there and she stated that she is supposed to come in on Thursday (2/11/21) to sign the corrective action plan. Excerpts from CNA D's statement is as follows: I was disappointed by the actions of my supervisor [LPN A name redacted]. Normally if a resident refuses care (especially at this time early in the morning or during the night) I would leave give them time and come back to them. This morning [LPN A name redacted] said she'll go in there with me and get [resident name redacted] up. [LPN A] began to pull [resident #15's name redacted] clothes down while she was still in bed. As [LPN A] was yanking on her pajama pants she was also speaking in a loud, uncalm voice. I could tell that [resident name redacted] was frightened as she tried to hold on to her pajama pants. I couldn't look [LPN A's name redacted] way and all I could think was to get between [LPN A] and [Resident #13]. By then [Resident #13 name redacted] was on the side of the bed looking scared and confused as [LPN A name redacted] kept talking loudly and kicking the ripped pull-up that fell to the floor. I heard [Resident #13] telling [LPN A] stop hitting my furniture. When [LPN A] was kicking the stuff (pull up and pants) on the floor out of the way, she was bumping or hitting the walker and rocking chair with her feet which then were hitting the wall. At this time I was standing there looking for an opening to get between LPN A and what she was doing, and in front of [resident #13] So I got to [Resident #13] and washed and changed her right there at her bedside. LPN A still talking loudly and inappropriately to [Resident #13] at this time she was shaking. The next night I went to work and when I knocked on her door she jumped. I went to her to calm her down and she was shaking and seemed scared. She told me that she black woman with the round thing on her head wet into her room and kept hitting her head on the wall. On 2/11/21 the Administrator showed surveyor second Corrective Action Plan for LPN A dated 2/2/21 excerpts are as follows: Employee name: [redacted] Department: Nursing Date 2/2/21 Date of Occurrence: 2/2/21 Action Taken: [box checked] Discharge from Employment Description of Issue: [box checked] Unsatisfactory Work Quality [box checked] Policy Violation Explanation: Employees are subject to appropriate diciplinary [sic] action up to and including dismissal for violations of the Home's policies including but not limited to the following : Negligent or poor performance of duties; Sleeping on Duty. pg. 74 employee handbook. NOTE: The LPN A was subsequently terminated on Thurs 2/11/21 for Sleeping on Duty. A review of the Abuse and Neglect Policy read: Page 7 of 13 Paragraph E Investigation Abuse Policy Requirements: It is the policy of this Home that reports of abuse (mistreatment, neglect, or abuse, including injuries of unknown source, exploitation and misappropriation of property) are promptly and thoroughly investigated. Page 9 Paragraph F Protection Abuse Policy Requirements: It is the policy of this HOME that the resident(s) will be protected from the alleged offender(s). Procedure: Immediately upon receiving a report of alleged abuse, the Administrator, and / or designee will coordinate delivery of appropriate medical and or psychological care and attention. Ensuring safety and wellbeing for the vulnerable individual are of utmost priority. Safety, security and support of the Resident, their roommate, if applicable and other Residents with the potential to be affected will be provided. This should include as appropriate: 1. Procedures must be in place to provide the Resident with a safe, protected environment during the investigation. a. The alleged perpetrator will immediately be removed and the Resident protected. Employees accused of alleged abuse will be immediately removed from the Home and will remain removed pending the results of a thorough investigation. (Decision of the extent of immediate disciplinary action will be made by the Administrator and/or designee). On 2/11/21 during the end of day conference the Administrator was made aware of the concerns and no further information was provided. The Administrator was made aware of the concerns during the end of day meeting on 2/10/21, and no further information was provided.
SERIOUS (G)

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Pressure Ulcer Prevention (Tag F0686)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to identify and treat a Stage 3 sac...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to identify and treat a Stage 3 sacral pressure wound for 1 Resident (Resident #18) in a sample size of 17 residents. This is harm. The findings included: Resident #18, a [AGE] year old male, was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included but were not limited to type 2 diabetes mellitus and dementia. Resident #18's Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 12/21/2020 was coded as a quarterly assessment. The Brief Interview for Mental Status was coded as 11 out of possible 15 indicative of moderate cognitive impairment. Functional status for bed mobility was coded as requiring extensive assistance from staff. Urinary continence was coded as frequently incontinent. Bowel continence was coded as occasionally incontinent. On 02/09/2021 at approximately 2:47 P.M., Resident #18 was observed sleeping in bed lying supine and leaning to the right with the head of the bed elevated approximately 30 degrees. Resident #18 had a wedge under his head and pillows on each side of the bed. On 02/09/2021 through 02/11/2021, Resident #18's clinical record was reviewed. An excerpt of a nursing skin assessment dated [DATE] at 9:45 A.M. under the header Skin Evaluation and sub-header site documented, Coccyx. Beside this site under the sub-header Description, it was documented, 2x2x1 stage 3 open area per wound doctor. A physician's order for zinc oxide paste to apply to sacrum topically had a start date of 12/18/2020 and an end date of 12/23/2020. A physician's order for calcium alginate to apply to sacrum topically had a start date of 12/24/2020 and an end date 02/05/2021. On 02/11/21 at approximately 2:05 P.M., this surveyor and Licensed Practical Nurse D (LPN D) entered Resident #18's room to perform a skin assessment. LPN D stated that [Resident #18] had a healed stage 3 sacral wound. LPN D asked Employee J, a physical therapist, to assist with positioning. LPN D and Employee J assisted Resident #18 to reposition to his left side to assess sacral region. When the facility staff removed the brief, it was noted Resident #18 had a bowel movement in the brief but it did not obstruct the view of the sacral region. There was no dressing and no evidence of paste or cream on the buttocks or sacral region. The skin in the sacral region was reddened with an open area and slough at the center of the wound. When asked about assessment findings, LPN D stated that the wound physician saw [Resident #18] a few days ago and that [Resident #18] had a healed stage 3 sacral pressure wound. LPN D also stated that now it looks like [Resident #18] needs a treatment plan. LPN D also stated she would notify the wound doctor. On 02/11/2021 at approximately 4:05 P.M., LPN D provided wound physician notes and nursing notes associated with the finding. When asked how often skin assessments are performed, LPN D stated the nurses perform skin assessments once a month and document them in the electronic health record. LPN D also stated that the CNA's [certified nursing assistants] do skin checks with baths and document them in a book on the unit. A wound physician note dated 02/03/2021 under the header Stage 3 Pressure Wound Sacrum and sub-header Wound Progress, it was documented, Resolved. Anatomic location of previously existing wound examined today: epithelialized and resolved. Follow up only as needed. On 02/11/2021 at approximately 5:15 P.M., the facility staff provided a copy of the CNA skin check sheets for Resident #18. A document filled in by Certified Nursing Assistant A (CNA A) dated 02/10/2021 at 8:45 P.M. entitled, Pressure Ulcer Identification Pocket Pad documented the following header: CNA please complete for your unit, Check areas during your rounds, dressing and bathing, You are the first set of eyes that sees the skin, be sure to check feet, heels, buttocks and all other areas especially pressure areas, Please feel free to write on this sheet and use descriptions and circle or mark site on the image below and turn in to your nurse so they can follow-up, thanks. Place the patient's/resident's name on the top of the pad, date it, and place an X on the area of concern. Give this to the nurse and ask him or her to check the patient/resident. They will follow-up as needed. There was an X marked on the sacral region with the word Discoloration written beside it. On the bottom right side of the page, it was documented, Noted RN [registered nurse] 02/10/2021. A nurse's note written by LPN D dated 02/11/2021 at 2:31 P.M. (approximately 30 minutes after the wound observation with this surveyor) documented, Upon checking residents [sic] buttocks, noticed sacrum wound stage 3 pressure area appeared reopened formally resolved on 02/03/2021 with [wound physician company name] wound specialist [physician name] in person, sacrum wound area red, 1.0 x 1.0cm [centimeter], partial thickness skin loss noted but no bone, tendon or muscle tissues are exposed, area is without drainage or slough, resident stated he had no pain, PT [physical therapist name] assisted in turning and repositioning of resident, contacted [wound doctor name] to complete telemed visit for re-opened pressure wound to sacrum. An excerpt of a nurse's note written by LPN D dated 02/11/2021 at 3:01 P.M. documented, Resident evaluated by [wound doctor name and company] wound specialist via telemed for re-opened stage 3 pressure wound to sacrum, per forms 2 x 2 x 0.1 cm, 'Patient with a re-opened stage 3 wound, when healed used zinc paste as prevenative [sic] measure, please resume q day [every day] alginate dressing with foam which has worked in the past, [sic]' A nurses note written by LPN D dated 02/11/2021 at 3:25 P.M. documented, Stage 3 pressure sacrum wound claened [sic] and dry, no drainage no signs of infection noted, calcium alginate with foam dressing applied to scarum [sic], no pain noted during dressing change, eveing [sic] nurse present and notified of new orders. A nurse's note written by LPN D dated 02/11/2021 at 3:32 PM documented, Resident on pressure relieving mattress, wedge placed under resident buttocks, reisdent [sic] currently facing the window, notified cna [certified nursing assistant] to continue to turn the resident and reposition q 2hr [every two hours] and as needed, contniue [sic] back to bed after meals. A wound physician note dated 02/11/2021 under the header Focused Wound Exam (Site 4) Stage 3 Pressure Wound Sacrum included but not limited to the following sub-headers and input: Etiology: Pressure MDS 3.0 Stage: 3 Duration: > [greater than] 1 days [sic] Wound size (L x W x D)[length x width x depth]: 2 x 2 x 2 x 0.1 cm [centimeters]. Surface area: 4.00 cm² Exudate: Moderate Serous Slough: 20% Granulation tissue: 60% Other viable tissue: 20% (dermis). Additional Wound Detail: Patient with reopened stage 3 wound. When healed a prevention order was put in place using zinc paste. Please resume algiante [sic] and foam which has worked well in the past. Dressing Treatment Plan Primary Dressing: Alginate calcium apply once daily for 30 days Secondary Dressing: Foam Silicone bdr [border] & faced apply three times per week for 30 days Reason for No Debridement: Telemedicine. On 02/12/2021 at approximately 11:15 A.M., an interview with the Director of Nursing was conducted. In reference to another Resident, the Director of Nursing stated that a skin assessment by a CNA was completed. When questioned about CNA's doing skin assessments, the Director of Nursing stated, Well, it's not a skin assessment, the CNA's are just looking to see if they see discolorations and then they report it to the nurse. When asked about policy for the frequency of skin assessments, the Director of Nursing stated that nurses complete skin assessments once a month and the CNA's fill out the sheet once a week or when giving [residents] a bath. When informed of discovering a stage 3 sacral pressure wound during a skin assessment with this surveyor on 02/11/2021, the Director of Nursing stated [Resident #18] was up in his chair longer than usual on the previous day (02/10/2021) due to a doctor's appointment so the re-opening of the stage 3 sacral wound may be due to that. On 02/12/2021 at approximately 1:45 P.M., the administrator was notified of the wound observation (discovery of a stage 3 sacral pressure wound with slough in the wound bed) with this surveyor and facility staff on 02/11/2021. On 02/16/2021 at approximately 8:15 A.M., the facility staff provided further documents which included the following: A handwritten statement entitled, Statement from CNA that had [Resident #18] on 2/11/21 from 6AM - 2PM documented, I got [Resident #18's name] down and up 4 times yesterday 02/11/21 and I applied cream on his bottom each time. He ate, was cleaned up from bowel movements and urinations several times. The statement was signed by CNA E and dated 2/12/21. Below that handwritten statement, there was another handwritten statement dated 2/15/21 and documented, [CNA E's name] stated that she changed him again after lunch he was dry. That statement was signed by Registered Nurse A (RN A). A handwritten statement written by CNA A dated 2/12/21 but not timed documented, On 2/11/2021 (no time included) while helping a resident to the bathroom, the nurse told me that [Resident #18's name] needed to be changed. When I finished helping the resident I went to change [Resident #18's last name]. He was incontinent of stool and urine I wash him up [sic] an [sic] put calmosptine [sic] on his bottom and around his wounds. The dressing was still in place. A typewritten statement dated 2/15/21 signed by Employee J, Physical Therapist, documented, On Thursday, February 11, 2021 Physical Therapist was asked to assist the wound care nurse in turning a patient in bed so his skin could be assessed. Therapist observed the patient sacral region had white epithelial scar tissue with blanchable pink borders/periwound & appeared to be healing wound. The skin surrounding the wound area, wound borders and the wound itself appeared clean. The skin on patient's buttocks was clean and intact, as there were no other observable wounds noted. Physical therapist also observed that the patient had just begun to have a bowel movement when the nurse remove the diaper for the patient's skin to be assessed. Upon initially removing the diaper it appeared to be clean, dry and free of stool. Therapist was unable to observe the perianal scan due to patient having just begun to have a bowel movement. This statement contradicts what LPN D and the wound physician documented in the clinical record. In summary, the facility staff failed to identify and treat a stage 3 sacral pressure wound until it was discovered during a skin assessment with the wound nurse and this surveyor on 02/11/2021. According to the CNA sheet completed by CNA A on 02/10/2021 at 8:45 P.M., there was discoloration in the sacral region and a registered nurse (unnamed) was made aware on 02/10/2021. There was no evidence in the clinical record the sacral region was then assessed by a nurse or findings documented.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 3. For Resident #5, the facility staff failed to report an injury of unknown injury which was discovered by a certified nursing ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 3. For Resident #5, the facility staff failed to report an injury of unknown injury which was discovered by a certified nursing assistant on 01/12/2021. Resident #5, a [AGE] year old female, was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #5 included but were not limited to atherosclerosis and peripheral vascular disease. Resident #5's most recent Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 01/06/2021 was coded as an annual assessment. The Brief Interview for Mental Status was coded as 99 meaning unable to complete the interview. Cognitive Skills for Daily Decision Making were coded as moderately impaired. Short-term and Long-term memories were coded as memory problem. Functional status for bed mobility and transfers were coded as requiring extensive assistance from staff. On 02/11/2021 at approximately 8:45 A.M., the clinical record was reviewed. A nurse's note dated 01/12/2021 at 6:46 A.M. documented, Note Text: cna reported to writer that she noted discoloration to right hand between 2nd and 3rd fingers, denies pain will continue to monitor the area. The subsequent nurse's notes through 01/18/2021 at 2:26 P.M. were reviewed and the injury of unknown origin to the right hand was not addressed. On 02/12/2021 at approximately 9:20 A.M., a copy of the facility-reported incident and the investigation documentation associated with this injury of unknown origin to the right hand were requested. On 02/12/2021 at approximately 11:15 A.M., an interview with the Director of Nursing was conducted. The Director of Nursing stated that it was not reported investigated or reported to the state agency. The Director of Nursing stated the staff were re-educated and a facility-reported incident will be sent to the state agency. When asked about expectation from staff when an injury of unknown origin is discovered, the Director of Nursing stated the expectation is that the nurse report it as soon as possible so we can send in a FRI [facility-reported incident] and begin the investigation. The Director of Nursing also stated the expectation includes assessing and interviewing residents and staff associated with the injury and notify all the proper people and the doctor. The facility staff provided a copy of their policy entitled, Abuse, Neglect, Mistreatment and Misappropriation of Resident Property. In Section G entitled, Reporting and Response under the header, Abuse Policy Requirements, it was documented, It is the policy of this Home that abuse allegations (abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of Resident property) are reported per Federal and State law. The Home will ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, are reported immediately, but not later than two (2) hours after the allegation is made, if the events that caused the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than twenty-four (24) hours if the events that caused the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the Home and to other officials (including to the State Survey Agency and adult protective services where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities) in accordance with State law through establish procedures. In addition, local law enforcement will be notified for any reasonable suspicion of a crime against a Resident in the home. In summary, Resident #5 had an injury of unknown source to her right hand between the 2nd and 3rd fingers (identified on 01/12/2021) and the facility staff failed to report. On 02/12/2021 at approximately 1:45 P.M., the administrator and Director of Nursing were notified of findings. Based on interviews, facility documentation and clinical record reviews the facility staff failed to report abuse to the state agency for 3 Residents (#15, #13, and #5) in a survey sample of 17 Residents. The findings included: 1. For Resident #15 the alleged abuse occurred on 1/1/21 and was not reported to the state agency until 2/10/21 when surveyors notified the Administrator that it had not been reported. Resident #15 an [AGE] year old woman, was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of but not limited to dementia without behavioral disturbance, anemia, chronic kidney disease, anxiety, major depressive disorder, falls, and atherosclerotic heart disease. Resident #15's most recent MDS (minimum data set) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 12/21/20, an quarterly assessment, coded Resident #15 as having a BIMS (brief interview of mental status) score of 10 out of a possible 15. This score indicates moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS codes the resident as needing extensive assistance with physical assistance of 1 person for toileting, hygiene, dressing and bed mobility. She requires limited assistance with physical assistance of 1 person for walking in room, and transfers. She requires supervision for eating meals. The Resident uses a walker to aid in mobility. On 2/9/21 approximately 1:00 PM Resident #15 was asked about abuse and neglect in the facility, she stated There was one aide that wasn't nice but I told her to leave. She hasn't been around lately. On 2/10/20 during clinical record review it was discovered that the following entry was made in the progress notes: 1/1/21 at 9:18 PM - At 430 PM [Resident #15 name redacted] came out from her room and was ambulating with her rollator. She passed by the nurse's station and stated 'Someone banged my face and head in the bars this morning.' Writer asked if she can recall the name of the person and she stated 'I don't know.' On 2/10/21 at approximately 11:00 AM an interview was conducted with the Administrator and she was asked if there were any FRI's involving this Resident she stated that there were not. When asked if there were any incidents involving this Resident and a staff member she stated I'm not sure I think when I was out . something happened. On 2/10/21 at 11:41 an interview was conducted with the DON and the Administrator who was asked about an incident involving Resident #15 and LPN A. The Administrator stated it happened when she was out sick. The DON called me at home. The DON was asked why this incident was not reported to the OLC (state agency) and she stated I forgot. The Administrator submitted the FRI to the OLC on 2/10/21 at 3:50 PM. On 2/11/21 during the end of day meeting the Administrator was made aware of concerns and no further information was provided. 2. For Resident #13 the facility failed to report allegation of abuse. Resident # 13 a [AGE] year old woman, admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of but not limited to hypertension, malignant neoplasm of pancreas, diabetes, urinary tract infection, prosthetic heart valve, and age related macular degeneration. Resident #13's most recent MDS (minimum data set) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 12/4/20, an annual assessment, coded Resident #13 as having a BIMS (brief interview of mental status) score of 14 out of a possible 15. This score indicates no cognitive impairment. The MDS codes the resident as needing extensive assistance with all aspects of ADL care with the exception of eating. Resident #13 is able to feed herself with only supervision. The Resident uses a walker for aid in short distance mobility and a wheelchair for longer distances. On 2/10/21 at approximately 10:00 AM Surveyor C observe the following interaction. At 9:20 AM Resident #13 was in wheel chair next to the medication cart. Resident #13 stated Somebody kicked me. LPN C asked Who kicked you? Resident replied I don't know. LPN C assisted the Resident to lift her right pant leg to reveal a dressing on right shin. LPN C then stated to the resident No one kicked you and went on to tell Resident that she had a dressing on her shin from a skin tear. Another staff member then approached Resident and rolled her down the hall in wheel chair. At 10:40 AM Surveyor B interviewed Resident #13 after she returned from physical therapy. The Resident was asked about the injury to her right shin and she stated Somebody kicked me, I don't remember who. When asked about abuse or neglect she stated I cannot stand that nurse from last night we had a fight. When asked what happened she stated I can't stand her she is rude and she just would not leave me alone, so we got into a fight. She is not a good nurse and she drops stuff and then picks it up off the floor and gives it to you. That's not sanitary or wise these days. She has no patience. I was kicking at her to get her to leave me alone. They know I don't like her and don't want her in my room. On 2/10/21 a review of the clinical record revealed the following progress note: 2/10/21 at 12:59 AM - Resident call bell was on, and staff went to answer the call bell, resident stated she want to go to BR, staff got resident up in the w/c and assisted resident to the bathroom and while assisting resident back to bed she refused to allow staff to apply pillow under her legs and was insisting on keeping her legs outside the bed sa [sic] staff was assisting to put the legs back to bed resident became physically aggressive and started kicking and swinging at staff was verbally aabusive [sic] and told staff she hate her, redirected and assured resident that staff is here to help and to assure her safety. On 2/10/21 at approximately 10:58 AM an interview was conducted with the Administrator. She was asked if she was aware of an allegation of abuse by Resident #13. She stated that she had not heard of this but would start an investigation. The state agency was sent a FRI at 11:56 on 2/10/21. The Administrator was made aware of the concerns during the end of day meeting on 2/10/21, and no further information was provided.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Investigate Abuse (Tag F0610)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 3. For Resident #5, the facility staff failed to investigate an injury of unknown injury that was identified on 01/12/2021. Resi...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** 3. For Resident #5, the facility staff failed to investigate an injury of unknown injury that was identified on 01/12/2021. Resident #5, a [AGE] year old female, was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses for Resident #5 included but were not limited to atherosclerosis and peripheral vascular disease. Resident #5's most recent Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 01/06/2021 was coded as an annual assessment. The Brief Interview for Mental Status was coded as 99 meaning unable to complete the interview. Cognitive Skills for Daily Decision Making were coded as moderately impaired. Short-term and Long-term memories were coded as memory problem. Functional status for bed mobility and transfers were coded as requiring extensive assistance from staff. On 02/11/2021 at approximately 8:45 A.M., the clinical record was reviewed. A nurse's note dated 01/12/2021 at 6:46 A.M. documented, Note Text: cna reported to writer that she noted discoloration to right hand between 2nd and 3rd fingers, denies pain will continue to monitor the area. On 02/12/2021 at approximately 11:15 A.M., an interview with the Director of Nursing was conducted. When asked about investigation documentation associated with this injury of unknown origin, the Director of Nursing stated that it was not investigated. The facility staff provided a copy of their policy entitled, Abuse, Neglect, Mistreatment and Misappropriation of Resident Property. In Section E entitled, Investigation under the header Abuse Policy Requirements, it was documented, It is the policy of the Home that reports of abuse (mistreatment, neglect, or abuse, including injuries of unknown source, exploitation and misappropriation of property) are promptly and thoroughly investigated. In Section E, Part 2 and subpart (a), it was documented, Investigation of injuries of Unknown Origin or Suspicious injuries: must be immediately investigated to rule out abuse: (a) Injuries include but are not limited to, bruising of the inner thigh, chest, face, and breast, bruises of an unusual size, multiple unexplained bruises, and/or bruising in an area not typically vulnerable to trauma. In summary, Resident #5 had an injury of unknown source to her right hand between the 2nd and 3rd fingers (identified on 01/12/2021) and the facility staff failed to investigate the matter. On 02/12/2021 at approximately 1:45 P.M., the administrator and Director of Nursing were notified of findings. Based on interview, facility documentation and clinical record review the facility staff failed to investigate, prevent and correct allegations of abuse in a timely manner for 3 Residents (#15, #13, and #5) in a survey sample of 17 Residents. The findings included: 1. For Resident #15 the facility failed to remove the alleged abuser from the resident pending investigation. Resident #15 an [AGE] year old woman, was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of but not limited to dementia without behavioral disturbance, anemia, chronic kidney disease, anxiety, major depressive disorder, falls, and atherosclerotic heart disease. Resident #15's most recent MDS (minimum data set) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 12/21/20, an quarterly assessment, coded Resident #15 as having a BIMS (brief interview of mental status) score of 10 out of a possible 15. This score indicates moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS codes the resident as needing extensive assistance with physical assistance of 1 person for toileting, hygiene, dressing and bed mobility. She requires limited assistance with physical assistance of 1 person for walking in room, and transfers. She requires supervision for eating meals. The Resident uses a walker to aid in mobility. On 2/10/20 during clinical record review it was discovered that the following entry was made in the progress notes: 1/1/21 at 9:18 PM - At 430 PM [Resident #15 name redacted] came out from her room and was ambulating with her rollator. She passed by the nurse's station and stated 'Someone banged my face and head in the bars this morning.' Writer asked if she can recall the name of the person and she stated 'I don't know.' The Administrator submitted a Corrective Action Plan for LPN A excerpts are as follows: Employee Name: [redacted] Department: Nursing Date: 1/28/21 Date of Occurrence: 1/1/21 Location: Nursing Time: 11 pm -7 am Action Taken: Written Counseling Description of Issue: [box checked] Policy Violation [box checked] other: Mental Intimidation. Explanation: It was reported to Acting DON by Administrator on 1/6/21 of an incident involving resident # [medical record number redacted] on the morning of 1/1/21. The report stated that Resident was refusing care which was reported to the Charge Nurse, [LPN A name redacted]. At that time, Charge Nurse and CNA both went in to care for Resident. Per report, Resident continued to be resistant to care and Charge Nurse began to pull down Residents clothes while Resident was in bed and was speaking to Resident in a loud and uncalm voice. When Charge Nurse was pulling Resident's clothes off, the bed was unlocked on one side and began to move with the headboard hitting the wall. Charge Nurse locked the bed and continued pulling clothes off, kicking the soiled depends and clothing on the floor at which time she was bumping or hitting the walker and rocking chair with her feet which in turn was hitting the wall and the furniture in the Resident's room. Resident yelled at Charge Nurse to stop and Charge Nurse responded that they were there to help her and she was fighting them and telling them that they were hitting her furniture. Charge Nurse then stated This is how we hit furniture and grabbed the walker or the rocking chair and was hitting it against the wall or the china dresser. CNA approached the Resident and took over washing her up and changing her clothes and Charge Nurse exited the room, however she was still talking to the Resident in a loud and Unocal manner. Per CNA, Resident at this time was reported to be shaking and walked outside of her room and sat in recliner on the unit. Another staff member came to see what all the loud voices was about and to see if everything was okay. The Charge Nurse said everything was Okay. On 2/10/21 a review of the time clock punches for LPN A revealed that LPN A continued to work on the very same unit with the Resident until 2/1/21. A review of the Abuse and Neglect Policy read: Page 9 Paragraph F Protection Abuse Policy Requirements: It is the policy of this HOME that the resident(s) will be protected from the alleged offender(s). Procedure: Immediately upon receiving a report of alleged abuse, the Administrator, and / or designee will coordinate delivery of appropriate medical and or psychological care and attention. Ensuring safety and wellbeing for the vulnerable individual are of utmost priority. Safety, security and support of the Resident, their roommate, if applicable and other Residents with the potential to be affected will be provided. This should include as appropriate: 1. Procedures must be in place to provide the Resident with a safe, protected environment during the investigation. a. The alleged perpetrator will immediately be removed and the Resident protected. Employees accused of alleged abuse will be immediately removed from the Home and will remain removed pending the results of a thorough investigation. (Decision of the extent of immediate disciplinary action will be made by the Administrator and/or designee). On 2/11/21 during the end of day conference the Administrator was made aware of the concerns and no further information was provided. 2. For Resident #13, LPN B failed to immediately report an accusation of abuse to the Administrator. Resident # 13 a [AGE] year old woman, admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of but not limited to hypertension, malignant neoplasm of pancreas, diabetes, UTI, prosthetic heart valve, and age related macular degeneration. Resident #13's most recent MDS (minimum data set) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 12/4/20, an annual assessment, coded Resident #13 as having a BIMS (brief interview of mental status) score of 14 out of a possible 15. This score indicates no cognitive impairment. The MDS codes the resident as needing extensive assistance with all aspects of ADL care with the exception of eating. Resident #13 is able to feed herself with only supervision. The Resident uses a walker for aid in short distance mobility and a wheelchair for longer distances. On 2/10/21 at approximately 10:00 AM surveyor C reported the following interaction. At 9:20 AM Resident #13 was in wheel chair next to the medication cart. Resident #13 stated Somebody kicked me. LPN C asked Who kicked you? Resident replied I don't know. LPN C assisted the Resident to lift her right pant leg to reveal a dressing on right shin. LPN C then stated to the resident No one kicked you and went on to tell Resident that she had a dressing on her shin from a skin tear. Another staff member then approached Resident and rolled her down the hall in wheel chair. At 10:40 AM surveyor B interviewed Resident #13 after she returned from physical therapy. The Resident was asked about the injury to her right shin and she stated Somebody kicked me, I don't remember who. When asked about abuse or neglect she stated I cannot stand that nurse from last night we had a fight. When asked what happened she stated I can't stand her she is rude and she just would not leave me alone, so we got into a fight. She is not a good nurse and she drops stuff and then picks it up off the floor and gives it to you. That's not sanitary or wise these days. She has no patience. I was kicking at her to get her to leave me alone. They know I don't like her and don't want her in my room. On 2/10/21 at approximately 10:58 AM an interview was conducted with the Administrator. She was asked if she was aware of an allegation of abuse by Resident #13. She stated that she had not heard of this but would start an investigation. The Administrator was made aware of the concerns during the end of day meeting on 2/10/21, and no further information was provided.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure that Resident #24's Mental...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure that Resident #24's Mental Health Care Plan had measurable goals. The facility staff failed to identify specific symptoms or behaviors related to depression, fatigue, racing thoughts, or ability to concentrate. The Findings included: Resident #24 was an [AGE] year old who, admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #24's diagnosis included Major Depressive Disorder, Dysthymic Disorder, Generalized Anxiety Disorder, Diabetes Mellitus Type 2, and Malignant Neoplasm of Left Breast. Resident #24's admission Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documented that the Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score was 14, indicating no cognitive impairment. Resident #24 had little interest or pleasure in doing things half or more days weekly, depression half or more days weekly, little energy, and trouble concentrating several days weekly. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documented the BIMS score of 10, indicating a decline in cognitive functioning. It coded Resident #24 as having a depressed mood several days weekly. It also coded tiredness nearly daily, and trouble concentrating. On 2/12/21, Resident #24's clinical record contained a Medication Administration Record dated 2/1/21. She received 10 mg of Lexapro daily for depression. Resident #24's Clinical Record was reviewed revealing the Mental Health Care Plan. An excerpt read: has depression r/t [related to] health status .will remain free of symptoms of depression, anxiety or sad mood through review date. The goals and interventions were not measurable in the Care Plan. On 12/16/21 at approximately 11:00 A.M., an interview was conducted with the facility Director of Nursing (Employee B). She was asked to describe Resident #24's specific, measurable goals. She was unable to say whether Resident #24 had progressed, regressed, or remained the same. She was unable to determine if the treatment was effective. The DON stated that she would look into it. No further information was received that documented specific measurable goals and interventions.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0657 (Tag F0657)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to revise the car...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to revise the care plan for 1 resident (Resident #16) in a sample size of 17 residents. The findings included: For Resident #16 the facility staff failed to review and revise his care plan to include assessing the AV fistula (used for dialysis access). Resident #16, an [AGE] year old man with diagnoses of but not limited to end stage renal disease, dependent on dialysis, sleep apnea, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, atrial fibrillation, asthma, hypertension and osteoarthritis of knees. Resident #16's most recent MDS coded as an annual with an ARD date of 10/27/19 coded the Resident as having a BIMS score of 12 out of 15 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The Resident was coded as requiring extensive assistance with all aspects of ADL with physical assistance of 1 person, except for eating which only required supervision. The Resident is unable to ambulate and uses a wheelchair for mobility. On 2/11/21 during clinical record review it was noted that the Resident was a dialysis patient with an AV Fistula. He had an order dated 3/6/20 to assess for thrill and bruit every shift (thrill is palpating the site to feel the blood moving freely and bruit is auscultating with a stethoscope to assess for patency). A review of the Residents care plan revealed this was not addressed. On 2/11/21 LPN D (the wound care nurse) was asked if there was anything special you had to do for Residents receiving dialysis. She stated that when a Resident is on dialysis his vitals and weights should be done before and after dialysis, his AV Fistula site should be checked for bleeding, his labs should be reviewed, and the nurses should be checking for bruit and thrill each shift. On 2/11/21 an interview was conducted with the DON at approximately 2:00 PM and she was asked what should be on the care plan and she responded The care plan should address anything that involves taking care of the resident for example pain, falls, any adaptive equipment, feeding, any behaviors, any wounds, or anything that would direct you how to care for the Resident. When asked if the care and assessment of an AV Fistula should be on there and she stated yes it should. On 2/11/21 during the end of day meeting the Administrator was made aware of the concerns and no further information was provided.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Respiratory Care (Tag F0695)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, staff interview, facility documentation review and clinical record review, the facility failed to provide ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, staff interview, facility documentation review and clinical record review, the facility failed to provide respiratory care therapy consistent with infection control measures for 1 Resident (Resident # 11) in a survey sample of 17 Residents. The findings included: For Resident # 11, the facility staff failed to change the water bottle attached to an oxygen concentrator weekly. The date on the water bottle attached to the oxygen concentrator was 1/29/2021. There was no date noted on the nasal cannula tubing. Resident # 11 was an [AGE] year old admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of, but not limited to: Pneumonia, Chronic Pulmonary edema, Heart Failure, Sarcoidosis, Malignant Neoplasm of the Stomach, hypertension, and Peripheral Vascular Disease. The most recent (Minimum Data Set) MDS was a Quarterly assessment with an (Assessment Reference Date ) ARD of 12/16/2020 coded Resident # 11 as having a (Brief Interview of Mental Status) BIMS score of 14 indicating No Cognitive Impairment. Resident # 11 required assistance of one staff person with activities of daily living. On 2/9/2021 at 3:09 PM during tour of the facility, Resident #11 was observed in her room sitting a recliner. Oxygen was provided at 2 liters per minute via a nasal cannula. Surveyor B observed the water bottle on the oxygen concentrator was dated 1/29/2021. It was 11 days since the water bottle had been changed. There was no date noted on the nasal cannula tubing. Review of clinical record was conducted on 2/9/2021 and 2/10/2021. Review of the Physicians Orders revealed an order dated 3/16/2020 for O2 (oxygen) at 2 L (liters) via N/C (nasal cannula) every shift for COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease). Review of the care plan revealed a focus area has oxygen therapy related to COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease). Interventions included Administer oxygen via nasal prongs/mask @ 2 Liters continuously Date initiated 10/08/2019. Follow facility protocol for infection control (O2 filter cleaning/changing, O2 tubing changing, etc.) Date initiated 10/08/2019. On 2/11/2021 at approximately 10:30 AM, an interview was conducted with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN ) F who stated the facility policy was to change the oxygen tubing and water bottle every 7 days. LPN G stated changing equipment weekly would help prevent infections. On 2/16/2021 at 2 PM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing who stated the facility policy was to change the oxygen/respiratory equipment every 7 days. The Director of Nursing stated it was important to change the respiratory equipment weekly to prevent the potential spread of infection. During the end of day debriefing with Administrative staff on 2/16/2021, the Administrator, Director of Nursing were informed of the findings. The Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON) stated the expectation was to change the oxygen equipment and water bottle weekly and document the date on a label. The DON stated the date on the water bottle would indicate the date the water bottle was changed. There should be a label placed on the oxygen tubing noting the date when changed. No further information was provided.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0740 (Tag F0740)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide Resident #24 with necessa...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide Resident #24 with necessary behavioral health care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being. The facility staff failed to ensure that Resident #24 received mental health services as required by her Care Plan. There was a 4-month delay in mental health assessment and treatment from May 19, 2020 [date of the Care Plan] until September 29, 2020. The Findings included: Resident #24 was an [AGE] year old who, admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #24's diagnosis included Major Depressive Disorder, Dysthymic Disorder, Generalized Anxiety Disorder, Diabetes Mellitus Type 2, and Malignant Neoplasm of Left Breast. Resident #24's admission Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documented that the Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score was 14, indicating no cognitive impairment. Resident #24 had little interest or pleasure in doing things half or more days weekly, depression half or more days weekly, little energy, and trouble concentrating several days weekly. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documented the BIMS score of 10, indicating a decline in cognitive functioning. It coded Resident #24 as having a depressed mood several days weekly. It also coded tiredness nearly daily, and trouble concentrating. The review of Resident #24's Clinical Record revealed the Mental Health Care Plan. An excerpt read, 5/6/20. Depression r/t (related to) health status .Arrange for psych / [Previous provider] consult. Follow-up as indicated. From 9/29/20, through 2/2/21, Resident #24 received weekly psychotherapy visits from her former outpatient provider however, no psychotherapy visits were provided from 5/6/2020 to 9/28/2020. On 12/16/21, at approximately 11:00 A. M. an interview occurred with the facility Director of Nursing (Employee B). The surveyor asked why Resident #24 had not received timely psychiatric evaluation and treatment as required by her Mental Health Care Plan in May 19, 2020. Psychiatric services did not occur until 9/29/20, indicating a delay of 4 months. The DON stated that she would look into it. There was no documentation of the reason for the delay in evaluation and treatment. In addition, during that 4-month period there were no Social Services provided.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, facility documentation and clinical record review the facility staff failed to implement infection control practices to help prevent the spread of infection. The findi...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, facility documentation and clinical record review the facility staff failed to implement infection control practices to help prevent the spread of infection. The findings included: Two facility staff members in the dining room failed to appropriately wear masks. On 2/9/21 at 12:15 PM it was observed by surveyors A & B that Employee G was noted to be feeding a Resident with her cloth mask below her nose. When surveyors went to speak to her she adjusted her mask to appropriately cover her nose and mouth. Employee H was observed walking from the kitchen into the dining room with mask below her chin. Once in the dining room she looked at the surveyors and pulled her mask up over her nose and mouth. Per CDC Facemask's Do's and Don'ts https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/downloads/hcp/fs-facemask-dos-donts.pdf Clean your hands and put on your facemask so it fully covers your mouth and nose. DO secure the elastic bands around your ears. DON'T wear your facemask under your nose or mouth. DON'T touch or adjust your facemask without cleaning your hands before and after. On 2/16/21 at approximately 11:00 AM an interview was conducted with the Administrator. She was asked about the expectation of staff wearing masks she stated that masks should be worn at all times covering the mouth and nose. She stated I will re-in-service them when told about Employee G & H not wearing masks appropriately. On 2/16/21 during the end of day meeting the Administrator was made aware of the concerns and no further information was provided
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0943 (Tag F0943)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on staff interview and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to ensure that required training for abuse and neglect were completed for 2 nurses on staff (LPN A, and LPN C) who...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on staff interview and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to ensure that required training for abuse and neglect were completed for 2 nurses on staff (LPN A, and LPN C) who were involved in investigations of allegations of abuse during survey. The facility further failed to identify that contracted nursing staff (LPN B) was trained on abuse. The findings included: The Facility failed to ensure mandatory annual abuse annual training for 2 facility staff Licensed Practical Nurses (LPN A & LPN C), and a contracted nurse (LPN B) involved in allegations of abuse. On 2/10/21 while investigating an allegation of abuse, the staff training records were reviewed and it was found that for LPN A, and LPN C they did not have the required training on abuse and neglect, and for LPN C the facility did not inquire about her training from the agency she worked for. LPN A was employed by the facility and her training record showed that she received abuse and neglect training in 7/23/16 7/30/17 and 9/26/18 there was no record of any abuse training after 9/26/18. For LPN C her training record revealed that she had received abuse and neglect training on 12/18/14, 9/5/15, 12/5/16, 4/13/18 and 12/5/19. There were no record of any abuse training after 12/5/19 On 2/16/21 at approximately 11:00 AM an interview was conducted with the Administrator and she was asked if the facility provided all staff training on abuse and neglect and she answered yes. She was asked how often this was done and she stated upon hire and yearly after that. When asked if the facility had provided abuse and neglect training to LPN B she stated no. She indicated that she would have to get those records from the agency that LPN B works for. When asked if she verified LPN's training with the Agency before putting her on the schedule stated that she did not. When asked does she routinely verify agency staff training she stated that she did not. On 2/16/21 during the end of day meeting the Administrator was made aware of the concerns and no further information was provided.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, staff interview, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to store, prepare, and serve foods in accordance with professional standards for food service safety...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, staff interview, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to store, prepare, and serve foods in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. The facility staff failed to monitor temperatures on 02/04/21 for the dairy walk-in cooler, the walk-in freezer, the bread walk-in cooler, the produce walk-in cooler, and the misc. walk-in cooler.; failed to monitor a sanitation sink on 02/07/2021 and 02/08/21; and failed to monitor dishwater temperatures on 02/03/21, 02/04/21, 02/07/21, and 02/08/21; On 02/09/2021 at approximately 12:25 P.M., Surveyor A and Surveyor C toured the kitchen with head cook, Employee C. This surveyor and Surveyor A observed the Refrigerator Temperature Checklist for the month of February 2021. There were temperature values for 4 refrigerators (dairy walk-in cooler, bread walk-in cooler, produce walk-in cooler, and the misc. walk-in cooler) and one freezer recorded for each day with the exception of 02/04/2021. For 02/04/2021, there were no temperature values recorded, the input for each column was marked with an X. When asked about the expectation for monitoring refrigerator temperatures, Employee C stated that the temperatures should be written in. On 02/09/2021 at approximately 12:40 P.M., this surveyor and Surveyor A observed the sanitation sink PPM [parts per million] log for the week beginning 02/07/2021. The PPM values were recorded daily at 6:30 A.M., 10:30 A.M., 2:30 P.M., and 4:00 P.M. with the exception of 02/07/2021 at 2:30 P.M., 02/07/2021 at 4:00 P.M., and 02/08/2021 at 6:30 A.M. When asked about the expectation for checking the sanitation sink, Employee C stated that they probably just forgot to sign it. On 02/09/2021 at approximately 12:45 P.M., this surveyor and Surveyor A observed the dishwasher wash/rinse temperature log for the month of February 2021. There were wash and rinse temperature values recorded daily at 7:00 A.M., 1:00 P.M., and 7:00 P.M. with the exception of 02/03/2021 at 7:00 A.M., 02/04/2021 at 7:00 A.M., 02/07/2021 at 7:00 A.M., and 02/08/2021 at 7:00 A.M. On 02/10/2021 at approximately 8:45 A.M., Employee D, the Dietary Manager, was notified of finding. When asked about the expectation for monitoring temperatures of the refrigerators and the dishwasher cycles, Employee D stated that the temperatures should be checked so we know what they are. On 02/10/2021 at approximately 9:00 A.M., the administrator was notified of findings and a copy of their related kitchen policies were requested. The facility staff provided a copy of their policy entitled, Dish Machine Temperature Log. Under the header Policy it was documented, Dishwashing staff will monitor and record dish machine temperatures to assure proper sanitizing of dishes. The facility staff provided a copy of their policy entitled, Cleaning Dishes/Dish Machine. Under the header, Policy, it was documented, All flatware, serving dishes, and cookware will be cleaned, rinsed, and sanitized after each use. The dish machines will be checked prior to meals to assure proper functioning and appropriate temperatures for cleaning and sanitizing. The facility staff provided a copy of their policy entitled, Food Safety and Sanitation. In Section 4 entitled, Food Storage subpart (a), it was documented, Refrigerated food is stored at or below 41 degrees F [Fahrenheit].
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Virginia facilities.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: 1 life-threatening violation(s), 2 harm violation(s). Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 19 deficiencies on record, including 1 critical (life-threatening) violation. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
  • • Grade F (33/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: Trust Score of 33/100 indicates significant concerns. Thoroughly evaluate alternatives.

About This Facility

What is August Healthcare At Richmond's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns AUGUST HEALTHCARE AT RICHMOND an overall rating of 2 out of 5 stars, which is considered below average nationally. Within Virginia, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.

How is August Healthcare At Richmond Staffed?

CMS rates AUGUST HEALTHCARE AT RICHMOND's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 46%, compared to the Virginia average of 46%.

What Have Inspectors Found at August Healthcare At Richmond?

State health inspectors documented 19 deficiencies at AUGUST HEALTHCARE AT RICHMOND during 2021 to 2022. These included: 1 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death), 2 that caused actual resident harm, and 16 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.

Who Owns and Operates August Healthcare At Richmond?

AUGUST HEALTHCARE AT RICHMOND is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by SIMCHA HYMAN & NAFTALI ZANZIPER, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 32 certified beds and approximately 27 residents (about 84% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in RICHMOND, Virginia.

How Does August Healthcare At Richmond Compare to Other Virginia Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Virginia, AUGUST HEALTHCARE AT RICHMOND's overall rating (2 stars) is below the state average of 3.0, staff turnover (46%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (2 stars) is below the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting August Healthcare At Richmond?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations.

Is August Healthcare At Richmond Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, AUGUST HEALTHCARE AT RICHMOND has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 1 Immediate Jeopardy citation (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 2-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Virginia. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.

Do Nurses at August Healthcare At Richmond Stick Around?

AUGUST HEALTHCARE AT RICHMOND has a staff turnover rate of 46%, which is about average for Virginia nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.

Was August Healthcare At Richmond Ever Fined?

AUGUST HEALTHCARE AT RICHMOND has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.

Is August Healthcare At Richmond on Any Federal Watch List?

AUGUST HEALTHCARE AT RICHMOND is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.