AMERICANA HEALTH & REHAB CTR
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Americana Health & Rehab Center has a Trust Grade of B+, which means it is above average and generally recommended for families considering care options. It ranks #1 out of 190 facilities in Washington and #1 out of 4 in Cowlitz County, indicating it is among the best choices available locally. However, the facility's trend is concerning as the number of reported issues has increased from 3 in 2023 to 11 in 2024. Staffing is a strength with a rating of 4 out of 5 stars and a turnover rate of only 29%, significantly lower than the state average, which suggests that staff are experienced and familiar with the residents. On the downside, a serious incident occurred where a resident's significant respiratory decline was not communicated to a physician, resulting in hospitalization; other issues included improper food storage and ongoing plumbing problems that posed risks to residents' safety. Overall, while there are notable strengths, families should weigh these incidents carefully when making a decision.
- Trust Score
- B+
- In Washington
- #1/190
- Safety Record
- Moderate
- Inspections
- Getting Worse
- Staff Stability ✓ Good
- 29% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 19 points below Washington's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Washington facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ○ Average
- Each resident gets 38 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for Washington. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 14 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
-
Low Staff Turnover (29%) · Staff stability means consistent care
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover is low (29%)
19 points below Washington average of 48%
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, staff retention, fire safety.
The Bad
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 14 deficiencies on record
Dec 2024
7 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0552
(Tag F0552)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** .
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents and/or resident representatives were informed an...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0604
(Tag F0604)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** .
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from physical restraints ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** .
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for anticoagulant...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** .
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure bowel interventions were initiated for 1 of 6 sampled re...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** .
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) during...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
.
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to label medications with the date first accessed in 2 of 3 medication storage areas (Ocean Side medication storage room and Ocean Side medica...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
.
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure food items were labeled and dated when opened in 1 of 2 kitchen refrigerators, and in 1 of 1 nourishment refrigerator...
Read full inspector narrative →
May 2024
1 deficiency
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Notification of Changes
(Tag F0580)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** .
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the physician was consulted regarding a signification chan...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jan 2024
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** .
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure bathing opportunities were provided for dependent resident...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0730
(Tag F0730)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
.
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure performance reviews were completed for 1 of 2 sampled nursing assistants (NA) (Staff E) reviewed for performance reviews. This fai...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(C)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Staffing Information
(Tag F0732)
Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents
.
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure nursing hours were accurately posted daily for 12 of 30 days reviewed for nurse staff posting. This failure placed residents, resi...
Read full inspector narrative →
Feb 2023
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0582
(Tag F0582)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** .
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) was issued at l...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** .
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure multiple dose vials of insulin were labeled w...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0921)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
.
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure their plumbing system was maintained and in working order to prevent flooding in the kitchen for 1 of 1 kitchens rev...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Grade B+ (83/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Washington.
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Washington facilities.
- • 29% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 19 points below Washington's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
- • 14 deficiencies on record, including 1 serious (caused harm) violation. Ask about corrective actions taken.
About This Facility
What is Americana Health & Rehab Ctr's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns AMERICANA HEALTH & REHAB CTR an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Washington, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Americana Health & Rehab Ctr Staffed?
CMS rates AMERICANA HEALTH & REHAB CTR's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 29%, compared to the Washington average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Americana Health & Rehab Ctr?
State health inspectors documented 14 deficiencies at AMERICANA HEALTH & REHAB CTR during 2023 to 2024. These included: 1 that caused actual resident harm, 12 with potential for harm, and 1 minor or isolated issues. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.
Who Owns and Operates Americana Health & Rehab Ctr?
AMERICANA HEALTH & REHAB CTR is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by EMPRES OPERATED BY EVERGREEN, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 74 certified beds and approximately 50 residents (about 68% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in LONGVIEW, Washington.
How Does Americana Health & Rehab Ctr Compare to Other Washington Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Washington, AMERICANA HEALTH & REHAB CTR's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 3.2, staff turnover (29%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (5 stars) is much above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Americana Health & Rehab Ctr?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is Americana Health & Rehab Ctr Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, AMERICANA HEALTH & REHAB CTR has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Washington. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Americana Health & Rehab Ctr Stick Around?
Staff at AMERICANA HEALTH & REHAB CTR tend to stick around. With a turnover rate of 29%, the facility is 17 percentage points below the Washington average of 46%. Low turnover is a positive sign. It means caregivers have time to learn each resident's needs, medications, and personal preferences. Consistent staff also notice subtle changes in a resident's condition more quickly. Registered Nurse turnover is also low at 25%, meaning experienced RNs are available to handle complex medical needs.
Was Americana Health & Rehab Ctr Ever Fined?
AMERICANA HEALTH & REHAB CTR has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Americana Health & Rehab Ctr on Any Federal Watch List?
AMERICANA HEALTH & REHAB CTR is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.