ROSEWOOD CENTER
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Rosewood Center in Grafton, West Virginia has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns about the quality of care provided. It ranks #86 out of 122 facilities in the state, placing it in the bottom half, and is the second out of two options in Taylor County, meaning only one local alternative is available. The facility's trend is worsening, with issues increasing from 4 in 2024 to 33 in 2025. Staffing is a relative strength with a turnover rate of 37%, which is below the state average, but the overall staffing rating is only 2 out of 5 stars. However, the facility has faced serious issues, including a critical incident where CPR was delayed for a resident who was unresponsive, and a serious case where a resident in severe pain from a pressure ulcer did not receive timely pain management. These findings highlight both staffing stability and serious care deficiencies that families should consider.
- Trust Score
- F
- In West Virginia
- #86/122
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Worse
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- 37% turnover. Near West Virginia's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- $54,759 in fines. Lower than most West Virginia facilities. Relatively clean record.
- Skilled Nurses ○ Average
- Each resident gets 34 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for West Virginia. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 76 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover below average (37%)
11 points below West Virginia average of 48%
Facility shows strength in fire safety.
The Bad
Below West Virginia average (2.7)
Below average - review inspection findings carefully
Near West Virginia avg (46%)
Typical for the industry
Above median ($33,413)
Moderate penalties - review what triggered them
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 76 deficiencies on record
Feb 2025
33 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on resident interview and observation, the facility failed to promote dignity by not serving residents who reside in the same room their meals at the same time. Resident identifier: #20. Facilit...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0552
(Tag F0552)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to inform the resident of the reason they were receiving hospice car...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0553
(Tag F0553)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility did not notify or include the resident in the planning of their care. This included the right to be involved in the planning process, the right to re...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0561
(Tag F0561)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on the interview and record review, the facility failed to assess the resident's potential for independent ambulation, and failed to provide him with the assistance necessary to accomplish his c...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0584)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. Resident #1's room was not in good repair. This was true for one (1) of 3...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure allegations of resident-to-resident abuse were reported within two (2) hours to the appropriate state agencies. The failure to...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to revise the care plan regarding the amount of assistance needed for activities of daily living (ADLs) for Resident #45. This was true ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0676
(Tag F0676)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assess the resident's potential for independent ambulation, and to ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide activities of daily living for a depende...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0685
(Tag F0685)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
b) Resident #219
On 02/25/25 at 9:15 AM, a record review for Resident #219 was completed. The review found the following progress note dated 08/21/24 at 11:06 PM stated, resident states his glasses h...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure an environment that was free from accident hazards over which the facility had control. This was true for one (1...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0697
(Tag F0697)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that pain management was provided in a manner consistent with professional standards of practice. This was true for one (1) of...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0699
(Tag F0699)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure care and services, in addition to professional standards to address the needs of a trauma/post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Staffing Information
(Tag F0732)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
The facility failed to ensure the daily nursing posting was completed accurately for three (3) days throughout the long-term care survey process. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Facility ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Dental Services
(Tag F0791)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure routine dental care was provided for Resident #219. Th...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medical Records
(Tag F0842)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review, the facility failed to provide an accurate and complete record regarding anticoagulation therapy for Resident #220. This was true for one (1) of one (1) residents reviewed unde...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment. ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0572
(Tag F0572)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on review of the resident council minutes, resident council meeting, and staff interview, the facility failed to inform residents both orally and in writing in a language that the residents unde...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0577
(Tag F0577)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on the resident council meeting, observation, and staff interviews, the facility failed to post notice of the availability of the most recent survey results in areas of the facility that were pr...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0582
(Tag F0582)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide the required Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (SNF ABN) form to two (2) of two (2) reside...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Grievances
(Tag F0585)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on resident interview, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to notify residents individually or through postings in prominent locations throughout the facility of the right to f...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Free from Abuse/Neglect
(Tag F0600)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from resident-to-resident abuse. This was true for six (6) of six (6) facility reported incidents reviewed...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Investigate Abuse
(Tag F0610)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to complete their self-identified corrective action which was intended to protect residents following an investigation into a resident-t...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** f) Resident #42
Observation of resident #42 throughout the long-term survey found that he stayed in bed all the time.
A review...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure they provided care to facility residents based on their comprehensive assessment and that residents received treatment and care...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Menu Adequacy
(Tag F0803)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review and staff and resident interview, the facility failed to ensure they followed the recipe for the meal served. This had the potential to affect more than isolated nu...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0804
(Tag F0804)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation and interviews the facility failed to provide food that was appetizing and appealing to residents. This issue had the potential to affect more than an isolated number of residents...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0809
(Tag F0809)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on staff and resident interview and resident council meeting interview, the facility failed to offer bedtime snacks to all residents. Resident identifiers: #51 and #35. Facility census: 64.
Fin...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation and staff interviews, the facility failed to wear hair covers in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This has the ability to affect all residents that ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Garbage Disposal
(Tag F0814)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to properly contain kitchen waste in kitchen waste receptacles. This practice had the potential to affect more than an isolated number of ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0865
(Tag F0865)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to incorporate an effective pest control program. This has the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. Faci...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0921)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a safe and homelike environment regarding packaged termi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0925
(Tag F0925)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to incorporate an effective pest control program. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. Faci...
Read full inspector narrative →
Sept 2024
4 deficiencies
1 IJ
CRITICAL
(J)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Deficiency F0678
(Tag F0678)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, facility reported incident review, and staff interview the facility delayed initiating Cardiopulmonary R...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0730
(Tag F0730)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure Nurse Aide (NA) # 14 had a performance evaluation completed every 12 months as required. This was true for one (1) of five (5) ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medical Records
(Tag F0842)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review, facility reported incident review, and staff interview the facility failed to ensure the resident record...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0943
(Tag F0943)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure the staff abuse and neglect training contained training related dementia management and resident abuse prevention. This was tru...
Read full inspector narrative →
Feb 2023
19 deficiencies
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Deficiency F0697
(Tag F0697)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
.
Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to assess and treat Resident #210's pain stemming from an unstageable pressure ulcer to his left heel resulting in actua...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0561
(Tag F0561)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
.
Based on resident interview, staff interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed for the care area of choices was afforded the opportunity to exerci...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Transfer Notice
(Tag F0623)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** .
b) Resident #25
Record review found the resident was transferred to the hospital on [DATE].
01/26/2023 3:40 am- General Note:...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0625
(Tag F0625)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** .
b) Resident #24
Record review found the resident was transferred to the hospital on [DATE].
01/26/2023 3:40 am- General Note:...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
.
Based on medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to complete an accurate minimum data set (MDS) assessment of one (1) of twenty MDS assessments reviewed during the investigatio...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
.
Based on record review, staff interview, and resident interview, the facility failed to ensure two (2) of two (2) residents reviewed for area of care plan during the long-term care survey process ha...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Tube Feeding
(Tag F0693)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
.
Based on observation, record review and staff and family interview, the facility failed to ensure the head of the bed was at an appropriate level during continuous tube feeding administration for Re...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Drug Regimen Review
(Tag F0756)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
.
Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure the consulting pharmacist's recommendations were answered in a timely manner for Resident #14 and additionally, the Director ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
.
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #14's drug regimen was free from unnecessary antipsychotic medications. The attending Physician agreed to do a grad...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
.
Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to ensure foods were stored in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This had the potential to affect a limited...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medical Records
(Tag F0842)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
.
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure one (1) of 20 residents reviewed, for the care area of advance directives, had a Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment (PO...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0919
(Tag F0919)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
.
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the call system was accessible to one (1) of 20 residents reviewed during the long term care survey process. This was a random...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
.
d) Resident #24
Record review found the resident is receiving Hospice services for chronic medical conditions. Diagnoses included: PVD, History (HX) of Cardiac Ischemia, HX of alcohol dependance, H...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pressure Ulcer Prevention
(Tag F0686)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** .
d) Resident #24
Record review found the resident is receiving Hospice services for chronic medical conditions. Diagnoses incl...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0698
(Tag F0698)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
.
Based on medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to provide appropriate before and after hemodialysis care and services. This was true for one (1) of one (1) reviewed for end-s...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0726
(Tag F0726)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** .
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff had the competencies and skill sets nece...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
QAPI Program
(Tag F0867)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** .
Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure systems were in place to ensure the ca...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0868
(Tag F0868)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
.
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the Quality Assessment and Assurance (QA&A) committee consisted of the required members. The infection preventionist was not...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(C)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Staffing Information
(Tag F0732)
Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents
.
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure an accurate staff posting with the total number of staff and the actual hours worked by licensed and unlicensed nursing staf...
Read full inspector narrative →
Oct 2021
20 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0558
(Tag F0558)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
.
Based on observation, resident interview and staff interview, the facility failed to provide proper eating utensils for residents. This was discovered during a meal observation, when Resident #25 wa...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0583
(Tag F0583)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
.
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to secure and keep confidential residents personal and medical information. The facility failed to safe guard private information that w...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Transfer Requirements
(Tag F0622)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** .
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to document all relevant information was provided to the recei...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pressure Ulcer Prevention
(Tag F0686)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** .
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to assess pressure ulcers in a timely manner. This failed prac...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0688
(Tag F0688)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
.
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to provide bilateral palm guards or rolled washcloths at all for bilateral hand contractures. This was a random opportunity for discover...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
.
Based on observation and interview, the facility did not ensure the resident's environment was free from accident hazards related to exposed wires of the bed remote control. This was a random opport...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Incontinence Care
(Tag F0690)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
.
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide services to provide appropriate nephrostomy care for one (1) of one (1) resident's reviewed for catheter care. A physician's orde...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0710
(Tag F0710)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
.
Based on staff interviews and record reviews, the facility did not ensure timely notification to the physician of Resident's significant weight loss. This was true for three (3) of six (6) resident'...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0713
(Tag F0713)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
.
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the provision of physician services 24 hours a day, in case of emergency. This failed practice had the potential to affect o...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
.
Based on observation, medical record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored and labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles. An ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** .
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to store and prepare foods in a safe and sanitary manner. During...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medical Records
(Tag F0842)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
.
Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a complete and accurate medical record. Specifically, a physician's orders were not obtained, and wrong weights were...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
QAPI Program
(Tag F0867)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
.
Based on review of the Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) attendance sheets and staff interview the facility failed to ensure the required committee members attended the QAA quarterly meetings. ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0578
(Tag F0578)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
.
Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's Physician's Order for Scope of Treatment (POST) form conveying end of life wishes was complete. This wa...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Notification of Changes
(Tag F0580)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
.
c) Resident #19
Record review of the facility's policy titled, Weights and Heights, revision date 06/01/21, showed the licensed nurse will notify the Family/Healthcare decision maker of the weight c...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0584)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** .
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a clean, comfortable, safe, and homelike environment. ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Transfer Notice
(Tag F0623)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** .
Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide evidence a resident/resident's representati...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
.
Based on record review, staff interview, and observation, the facility failed to ensure residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. Physician's orders...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
.
Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to help prevent the development and transmissio...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0727
(Tag F0727)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
.
Based on review of the staff schedules for Registered Nurse (RN) coverage and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure RN coverage eight (8) consecutive hours a day, seven (7) days a week. Thi...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • 37% turnover. Below West Virginia's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: 1 life-threatening violation(s), 1 harm violation(s), $54,759 in fines. Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 76 deficiencies on record, including 1 critical (life-threatening) violation. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
- • $54,759 in fines. Extremely high, among the most fined facilities in West Virginia. Major compliance failures.
- • Grade F (23/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Rosewood Center's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns ROSEWOOD CENTER an overall rating of 2 out of 5 stars, which is considered below average nationally. Within West Virginia, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.
How is Rosewood Center Staffed?
CMS rates ROSEWOOD CENTER's staffing level at 2 out of 5 stars, which is below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 37%, compared to the West Virginia average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Rosewood Center?
State health inspectors documented 76 deficiencies at ROSEWOOD CENTER during 2021 to 2025. These included: 1 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death), 1 that caused actual resident harm, 73 with potential for harm, and 1 minor or isolated issues. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.
Who Owns and Operates Rosewood Center?
ROSEWOOD CENTER is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by GENESIS HEALTHCARE, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 69 certified beds and approximately 63 residents (about 91% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in GRAFTON, West Virginia.
How Does Rosewood Center Compare to Other West Virginia Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in West Virginia, ROSEWOOD CENTER's overall rating (2 stars) is below the state average of 2.7, staff turnover (37%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (2 stars) is below the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Rosewood Center?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations and the below-average staffing rating.
Is Rosewood Center Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, ROSEWOOD CENTER has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 1 Immediate Jeopardy citation (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 2-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in West Virginia. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.
Do Nurses at Rosewood Center Stick Around?
ROSEWOOD CENTER has a staff turnover rate of 37%, which is about average for West Virginia nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Rosewood Center Ever Fined?
ROSEWOOD CENTER has been fined $54,759 across 2 penalty actions. This is above the West Virginia average of $33,626. Fines in this range indicate compliance issues significant enough for CMS to impose meaningful financial consequences. Common causes include delayed correction of deficiencies, repeat violations, or care failures affecting resident safety. Families should ask facility leadership what changes have been made since these penalties.
Is Rosewood Center on Any Federal Watch List?
ROSEWOOD CENTER is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.
ROSEWOOD CENTER
8 ROSE STREET, GRAFTON, WV 26354 | (304) 265-0095
Strengths
- Licensed facility
Concerns
- 1 Immediate Jeopardy citation
- 2-star rating
- 76 deficiencies
Ask about: Inspection Response, Rn Coverage
nursinghomedata.org | Data: CMS November 2025