SISTERSVILLE CENTER
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
SistersVille Center has a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns about the quality of care provided at this facility. It ranks #116 out of 122 nursing homes in West Virginia, placing it in the bottom half of facilities in the state and as the only option in Tyler County. Unfortunately, the facility is worsening, with the number of reported issues increasing from 17 in 2024 to 20 in 2025. Staffing is a mixed bag; while the turnover rate of 36% is better than the state average, the overall staffing rating is only 2 out of 5 stars, indicating below-average support for residents. There are serious concerns about the facility's handling of incidents, with critical findings revealing that staff failed to protect residents from sexual abuse for over six months, allowing a resident to inappropriately touch multiple female residents without proper investigation or reporting. Additionally, the facility has incurred $88,357 in fines, which is higher than 95% of facilities in West Virginia, suggesting ongoing compliance issues. While there is some stability in staffing, the alarming safety violations and lack of proper care raise significant red flags for families considering this facility.
- Trust Score
- F
- In West Virginia
- #116/122
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Worse
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- 36% turnover. Near West Virginia's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
- Penalties ○ Average
- $88,357 in fines. Higher than 53% of West Virginia facilities. Some compliance issues.
- Skilled Nurses ○ Average
- Each resident gets 39 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for West Virginia. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 74 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover below average (36%)
12 points below West Virginia average of 48%
Facility shows strength in fire safety.
The Bad
Below West Virginia average (2.7)
Significant quality concerns identified by CMS
Near West Virginia avg (46%)
Typical for the industry
Well above median ($33,413)
Moderate penalties - review what triggered them
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 74 deficiencies on record
Apr 2025
20 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0558
(Tag F0558)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review and staff and resident interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident with limited Range of Motion (ROM) was able to reach the call light to call for assistanc...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0584)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation and record review, the facility failed to provide a home-like environment during the dining experience. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Transfer Requirements
(Tag F0622)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure documentation that the appropriate information was com...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure an accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) regarding weight loss. This was true for one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed under the ca...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pressure Ulcer Prevention
(Tag F0686)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to prevent the development of an avoidable pressure ulcer to the right heel for Resident #22. This was true for one (1) of three (3) rec...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to transfer oxygen tanks in a safe manner. This was a random opportunity for discovery. Facility Census: 65.
Findings Incl...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0883
(Tag F0883)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide pneumococcal immunizations according to standards of practice. This deficient practice had the potential to affect one (1) of...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
b) Resident #22
On 03/31/25 at 12:38 PM, the lunch trays arrived at the dining room on A hall. Resident #22 was sitting with another resident. Nurse Aide (NA) #66 sat Resident #22's food in front of h...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Notification of Changes
(Tag F0580)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to complete a change in condition (CIC) for Resident #22's development of a pressure ulcer on the right heel. This was a random opportun...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to implement or develop comprehensive, person-cent...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure care plans were revised for Residents #42 fall, #22 de...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed. medications were admin...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0725
(Tag F0725)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to have sufficient staffing for the B hall on 03/29/25 and 03/30...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Menu Adequacy
(Tag F0803)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure daily menus were followed. This was a random opportunity for discovery and had the potential to affect more than ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0804
(Tag F0804)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review, staff interview, resident interview and observation, the facility failed to prepare and serve food at a safe and appetizing temperature. This failed practice had the potential ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored properly and food preparation equipment was clean. This failed practice had the potential to affe...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medical Records
(Tag F0842)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain complete, accurate, and timely medical records. This...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to help prevent the development and transmi...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Garbage Disposal
(Tag F0814)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on staff interview and observation, the facility to ensure garbage was disposed of properly. This failed practice had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Facility Ce...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0868
(Tag F0868)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure required members of the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) team were present to hold the required quarterly ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Oct 2024
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure two (2) allegations of resident-to-resident sexual abuse were reported in a timely fashion and/or to the appropriate state age...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person -centered care plan for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed in the complaint survey ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. This deficient pract...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Drug Regimen Review
(Tag F0756)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the attending physician documented in the resident's medical record that an identified irregularity had been reviewed ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Apr 2024
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0584)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
.
Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to ensure the resident environment was clean and sanitary. The dementia care unit dining area was unclean, a vitals machine had a brown s...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0679
(Tag F0679)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
.
Based on observations, record review, resident interviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to implement an ongoing resident centered activities program designed to meet the interest of and ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0680
(Tag F0680)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observations and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional. This had a potential to affect all residents residing in the fa...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
.
Based on observations, water temperature measurement and staff interview the facility failed to ensure the resident environment over which it had control was as free from accident hazards as possibl...
Read full inspector narrative →
Feb 2024
9 deficiencies
4 IJ (4 affecting multiple)
CRITICAL
(K)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Free from Abuse/Neglect
(Tag F0600)
Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents
Based on policy review, staff interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect the residents right to be free from abuse that resulted in mental anguish for Resident #57, #56, #61, and #62...
Read full inspector narrative →
CRITICAL
(K)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Abuse Prevention Policies
(Tag F0607)
Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents
Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their written Abuse Prohibition policy as it related to identifying investigating and reporting allegations of sexual abuse...
Read full inspector narrative →
CRITICAL
(K)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents
Based on policy review, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that alleged violations involving resident sexual abuse were reported, not later than 2 hours of the events / a...
Read full inspector narrative →
CRITICAL
(K)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Investigate Abuse
(Tag F0610)
Someone could have died · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to have evidence of thorough investigations and prevention of further abuse while investigations were in progress. The facility was awar...
Read full inspector narrative →
SERIOUS
(H)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Administration
(Tag F0835)
A resident was harmed · This affected multiple residents
Based on staff interview and record review, the facility administration failed to ensure the facility was administered in a manner that enabled it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to a...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0655
(Tag F0655)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care pl...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure two (2) residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice. The facility failed to en...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medical Records
(Tag F0842)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure they maintained medical records that were complete, accurately documented, readily accessible and systematically...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Drug Regimen Review
(Tag F0756)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on medical record review and staff interview the facility failed to maintain the resident's highest practicable level of physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being and the ability to prevent ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Apr 2023
22 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
.
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to provide care to residents in a manner that promoted the right to a dignified existence and failed to protect a residents privacy duri...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
.
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to report incidents resulting in serious bodily injury in a timely manner to the appropriate state agencies. This was true for one (1)...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Assessments
(Tag F0636)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** .
Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to complete an accurate comprehensive assessment for o...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** .
Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility staff failed to accurately complete the significant change co...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
.
Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to update Resident #55's care plan to reflect a change in nutritional status. This is true for one (1) of six (6) residents re...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pressure Ulcer Prevention
(Tag F0686)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** .
Based on record review, and staff interview the facility failed to assess pressure ulcers weekly to promote the healing of pre...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
.
Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure each resident was afforded the amount of supervision required to prevent accidents during the lunch time hour....
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medical Records
(Tag F0842)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
.
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain a complete and accurate medical record for one (1) of 24 sampled residents during the Long-Term Care Survey Process. Speci...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Grievances
(Tag F0585)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
.
Based on staff interview, resident council meeting, and record review the facility failed to provide residents a confidential way to file a grievance. This failed practice has the potential to affec...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Transfer Notice
(Tag F0623)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** .
Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to provide Notice of Discharge to the Office of the State Long ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0625
(Tag F0625)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** .
Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide evidence the resident and/or the resident's...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** .
Based on observation, medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to implement comprehensive person-centere...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** .
Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents receive treatment and care in acco...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0726
(Tag F0726)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
.
Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure Nurse Aides (NA) were able to demonstrate competencies on an annual basis. This was true for four (4) of five (5) nurse aides...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0730
(Tag F0730)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
.
Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to complete yearly performance evaluation for all Nurse Aides (NA). This was true for five (5) of five (5) nurse aides reviewed for sta...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Staffing Information
(Tag F0732)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
.
The facility failed to ensure the daily nurse staff posting was completed accurately for three (3) days throughout the long-term care survey process. This was a random opportunity for discovery and ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pharmacy Services
(Tag F0755)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
.
Based on observation, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure prescribed medications were available to be administered as ordered and staff failed to document the administra...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Drug Regimen Review
(Tag F0756)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
.
Based on record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the physician responded to monthly drug regimen reviews. This was true for four (4) of five (5) reviewed for unnecessary me...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Medication Errors
(Tag F0758)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
.
Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to monitor residents for side effects of psychotropic medications. This is true for three (3) of five (5) residents reviewed f...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
.
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to provide food services in accordance with professional standards. The facility failed to ensure food was labeled and dated, domed lids...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0868
(Tag F0868)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
.
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the Medical Director attended quarterly Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Committee Meetings (QAPI). This has th...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
.
Based on observation, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an effective infection prevention and control program designed to prevent the development and t...
Read full inspector narrative →
Mar 2022
15 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0584)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
.
a) Resident #19
On 03/23/22 at 10:20 AM, observation revealed the resident lying on the bed mattress without any sheets. Resident #19 stated, they came in about 45 minutes ago and ripped the sheets ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Pressure Ulcer Prevention
(Tag F0686)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** .
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident with pressure ulcers receives necessary t...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
.
Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the facility was free from accident hazards. A harmful cleaning product was found unattended in the shower roo...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Drug Regimen Review
(Tag F0756)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
.
c) Resident #1
On 03/22/22 at 10:00 AM, an electronic medical record review was completed.
A monthly medication review was completed by the consulting pharmacist on 12/24/21. The pharmacist's report...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0757
(Tag F0757)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
.
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure each resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary drugs. This was true for one (1) of five (5) residents reviewed for u...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0886
(Tag F0886)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
.
Based on facility documentation, policy review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide documentation that testing was completed and the results of each staff test for one (1) of eight (8...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0887
(Tag F0887)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
.
Based on facility documentation, policy review and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain documentation related to current staff COVID-19 vaccination for one (1) of eight (8) staff members...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0578
(Tag F0578)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** .
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure three (3) of 18 residents reviewed during the long-t...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
.
c) Resident #29
On 03/22/22 at 12:28 PM, a medical record review and review of the facility's reportables were reviewed.
Resident #29 experienced a fall on 03/09/22 after being noncompliant with th...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
.
c) Resident #261
Observation, on 03/21/22 at 11:45 AM, found Resident #261 was wearing oxygen. There was no date on the oxygen tubing and the oxygen humidifier bottle was dated 03/13/22.
A record r...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0725
(Tag F0725)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
.
e) 1:12 Ratio on Nights for Nurse Aides
The facility assessment, dated 02/16/22, stated that based on the facility resident population and their needs for care and support, the facility would utiliz...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0726
(Tag F0726)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
.
Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that nurse aides had demonstrated competency in skills and techniques necessary to care for residents' needs, as identified ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
.
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards. Staff did not consistently obtain the temperatu...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Room Equipment
(Tag F0908)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
.
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain the freezer in a safe and operational way. This had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents. Facilit...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0882
(Tag F0882)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
.
Based on facility documentation and staff interview, the facility failed to have a certified Infection Preventionist. This failed practice had the potential to affect all residents residing at the f...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • 36% turnover. Below West Virginia's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: 4 life-threatening violation(s), 1 harm violation(s), $88,357 in fines. Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 74 deficiencies on record, including 4 critical (life-threatening) violations. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
- • $88,357 in fines. Extremely high, among the most fined facilities in West Virginia. Major compliance failures.
- • Grade F (0/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Sistersville Center's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns SISTERSVILLE CENTER an overall rating of 1 out of 5 stars, which is considered much below average nationally. Within West Virginia, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.
How is Sistersville Center Staffed?
CMS rates SISTERSVILLE CENTER's staffing level at 2 out of 5 stars, which is below average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 36%, compared to the West Virginia average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care. RN turnover specifically is 58%, which is notably high. RNs provide skilled clinical oversight, so turnover in this role can affect medical care quality.
What Have Inspectors Found at Sistersville Center?
State health inspectors documented 74 deficiencies at SISTERSVILLE CENTER during 2022 to 2025. These included: 4 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death), 1 that caused actual resident harm, and 69 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.
Who Owns and Operates Sistersville Center?
SISTERSVILLE CENTER is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by GENESIS HEALTHCARE, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 68 certified beds and approximately 59 residents (about 87% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in SISTERSVILLE, West Virginia.
How Does Sistersville Center Compare to Other West Virginia Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in West Virginia, SISTERSVILLE CENTER's overall rating (1 stars) is below the state average of 2.7, staff turnover (36%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (1 stars) is much below the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Sistersville Center?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "Can you walk me through typical staffing levels on day, evening, and night shifts?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations and the below-average staffing rating.
Is Sistersville Center Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, SISTERSVILLE CENTER has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 4 Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 1-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in West Virginia. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.
Do Nurses at Sistersville Center Stick Around?
SISTERSVILLE CENTER has a staff turnover rate of 36%, which is about average for West Virginia nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Sistersville Center Ever Fined?
SISTERSVILLE CENTER has been fined $88,357 across 2 penalty actions. This is above the West Virginia average of $33,962. Fines in this range indicate compliance issues significant enough for CMS to impose meaningful financial consequences. Common causes include delayed correction of deficiencies, repeat violations, or care failures affecting resident safety. Families should ask facility leadership what changes have been made since these penalties.
Is Sistersville Center on Any Federal Watch List?
SISTERSVILLE CENTER is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.