BELOIT HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER

1905 W HART RD, BELOIT, WI 53511 (608) 365-2554
For profit - Limited Liability company 110 Beds CHAMPION CARE Data: November 2025
Trust Grade
0/100
#262 of 321 in WI
Last Inspection: September 2024

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Beloit Health and Rehabilitation Center has received a Trust Grade of F, which indicates significant concerns and a poor overall rating. They rank #262 out of 321 nursing homes in Wisconsin, placing them in the bottom half of facilities in the state, and #7 out of 10 in Rock County, meaning only three local options are worse. Although the facility is improving, having reduced issues from 21 in 2024 to just 5 in 2025, there are still serious concerns, including $101,076 in fines, which is higher than 78% of Wisconsin facilities, suggesting compliance issues. Staffing is rated average with a turnover rate of 36%, better than the state average, and the nursing coverage is also average, but specific incidents have raised alarms, such as a resident not receiving their insulin, which led to a hospitalization due to severe high blood sugar, and antibiotic misuse that caused actual harm to residents. While there are some strengths, such as improving trends and decent staffing levels, the serious infractions and fines should be carefully considered by families looking for care options.

Trust Score
F
0/100
In Wisconsin
#262/321
Bottom 19%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Getting Better
21 → 5 violations
Staff Stability
○ Average
36% turnover. Near Wisconsin's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
Penalties
✓ Good
$101,076 in fines. Lower than most Wisconsin facilities. Relatively clean record.
Skilled Nurses
✓ Good
Each resident gets 42 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than average for Wisconsin. RNs are trained to catch health problems early.
Violations
⚠ Watch
45 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Overall Rating
★★★☆☆
3.0
Staff Levels
★★★☆☆
3.0
Care Quality
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2024: 21 issues
2025: 5 issues

The Good

  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record
  • Staff turnover below average (36%)

    12 points below Wisconsin average of 48%

Facility shows strength in fire safety.

The Bad

1-Star Overall Rating

Below Wisconsin average (3.0)

Significant quality concerns identified by CMS

Staff Turnover: 36%

10pts below Wisconsin avg (46%)

Typical for the industry

Federal Fines: $101,076

Well above median ($33,413)

Significant penalties indicating serious issues

Chain: CHAMPION CARE

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

The Ugly 45 deficiencies on record

5 actual harm
Apr 2025 5 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Notification of Changes (Tag F0580)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility did not promptly notify and consult with a physician when a resident missed t...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility did not promptly notify and consult with a physician when a resident missed their medications for 1 of 1 resident's (R2) reviewed for medication administration. R2's physician was not notified when R2 did not receive antipsychotic medication over several days. This is evidenced by: The facility's policy titled Notification of Changes, dated 10/24/23, includes the following: The purpose of this policy is to ensure the facility promptly informs the resident, consults the resident's physician; and notifies, consistent with his or her authority, the resident's representative when there is a change requiring notification. The facility must inform the resident, consult with the resident's physician and/or notify the resident's family or legal representative when there is a change requiring such notification. The facility's policy titled Medication Error Reporting and Counseling Procedure, dated 12/12/23, includes the following: Notifying the Provider(s): The facility will inform the primary or prescribing physician(s) of the medication error in a timely manner and document notification in the medical record. This communication will help ensure that appropriate corrective measures can be taken, and future medication orders can be adjusted, if necessary. R2 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of schizophrenia. R2's physician orders include the following: Seroquel oral tablet 25 mg give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day related to Schizophrenia Start date 11/21/24 8:00 AM. Seroquel oral tablet 25 mg give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day related to Schizophrenia Start date 11/21/24 12:00 PM Seroquel oral tablet 25 mg give 2 tablets by mouth one time a day related to Schizophrenia Start date 11/21/24 4:00 PM R2's nurse progress notes include the following: 12/21/24 at 5:29 PM Seroquel oral tablet 25 MG . none in cart on order. 12/22/24 at 5:28 PM Seroquel oral tablet 25 MG .on order 12/23/24 at 5:35 PM Seroquel oral tablet 25 MG .on order 12/24/24 at 5:24 PM Seroquel oral tablet 25 MG .on order 12/25/24 at 10:23 AM Seroquel oral tablet 25 MG .waiting for delivery 12/25/24 at 12:27 PM Seroquel oral tablet 25 MG .waiting on delivery 12/25/24 at 4:15 PM Seroquel oral tablet 25 MG .on order 12/26/24 at 4:46 PM Seroquel oral tablet 25 MG . (no documentation) 12/27/24 at 6:53 PM Seroquel oral tablet 25 MG . on order 12/29/24 at 11:16 AM Seroquel oral tablet 25 MG . (no documentation) 12/29/24 at 4:14 PM Seroquel oral tablet 25 MG .awaiting delivery of medication 12/30/24 at 8:37 PM Seroquel oral tablet 25 MG . not in cart Of note, there is no documentation of the physician being notified that R2 did not have his prescribed Seroquel for these days. On 4/29/25 at 3:10 PM, Surveyor asked LPN G (Licensed Practical Nurse) to show surveyor what medications are in the facility's contingency medication supply. LPN G showed surveyor the facility's contingency supply contained Seroquel 25 mg. LPN G stated the contingency supply is usually 8 to 10 pills of the medication. On 4/29/25 at 11:40 AM, Surveyor interviewed RN D (Registered Nurse) regarding administering medications. RN D indicated if a resident does not have a medication, the nursing staff is supposed to look in the facility's contingency medication supply and pull the medication from there to give to the resident. RN D also stated the staff is supposed to call pharmacy and ask to have the medication delivered and to notify the physician. RN D indicated this should all be documented in the resident's medical record. Surveyor asked what the facility would do if a resident did not get the medication delivered and now it was the second day, and the resident still does not have the medication. RN D indicated the facility would call the pharmacy and have the medication stat delivered which means the medication should be there within 4 hours. Surveyor asked what the process would be if a resident did not have a medication on the third day. RN D indicated she has never had it get that far before. On 4/29/25 at 11:50 AM, Surveyor interviewed LPN E regarding administering medications. LPN E indicated on day one of a resident not having medication, the facility should look in the contingency medication supply and call pharmacy to order it. LPN E indicated the physician should also be notified. On day two of a resident not having medication, LPN E stated she would notify DON B (Director of Nursing). On day three of a resident not having a medication, LPN E indicated she would ask the provider for a substitute. On day four, LPN E indicated she would call the physician and do an assessment. LPN E indicated it is unacceptable for a resident to be without medication for four days. On 4/29/25 at 2:08 PM, Surveyor interviewed ADON/WN C (Assistant Director of Nursing/Wound Nurse) regarding medication administration. ADON/WN C indicated on day one of a resident not having medication, the staff should look in the contingency medication supply, call the physician and call pharmacy to have the medication stat delivered. Day two, the staff should notify the physician, call pharmacy and notify their supervisor. ADON/WN indicated there should not be a day three. On 4/29/25 at 2:25 PM, Surveyor interviewed DON B (Director of Nursing) regarding medication administration. DON B indicated if a resident does not have medication, on day one, the facility should check in the contingency medication supply, call pharmacy, and call the provider. On day two, the staff should call again. On day three, staff should call the physician, and the facility would have to call the head of pharmacy because there is a problem. On day four, the staff should do the same thing, call the pharmacy, and call the physician. DON B indicated an assessment needs to be done daily based on the missed medication. DON B indicated all of this should be documented in the resident's medical record. DON B stated missed medications is a medication error and a risk management should be completed. Surveyor notified DON B that surveyor was unable to locate any documentation of a completed assessment for the missed medication, the pharmacy being notified, or the physician being notified of the missed Seroquel for R2 for the dates of 12/21/24 through 12/30/24. DON B did not provide surveyor with any documentation regarding R2's missed Seroquel for those dates.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident, the reside...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident, the resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents/choice for 1 of 2 residents (R1) reviewed for non-pressure wounds. R1 had dates his wound care was not signed out in the TAR (Treatment Administration Record). R1 returned from the hospital and did not have a full assessment completed for his non-pressure wounds. This is evidenced by: The Facilities Policy and Procedure entitled Wound Treatment Management dated 2/14/23 documents in part: .Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1. Wound treatments will be provided in accordance with physician orders .7. Treatments will be documented on the Treatment Administration Record or in the electronic health record. 8. The effectiveness of treatments will be monitored through ongoing assessment of the wound . R1 is a long-term resident of the facility. R1 has the following diagnoses: metabolic encephalopathy, type 2 diabetes mellitus, cellulitis of RLE (right lower extremity) (infection of leg), open wound to RLE, open wound to LLE (left lower extremity), open wound to right foot, PVD (peripheral vascular disease- circulatory condition where narrowed blood vessels reduce blood flow to the limbs), and CHF (congestive heart failure- condition where the heart muscle is weakened and can't pump enough blood to meet the body's needs, leading to buildup of fluid in the lungs and other body parts). R1's TAR has the following documented: January 2025- blank box on 1/2/25. February 2025- 2/24/25 has 4 documented. According to key on TAR 4 is other/see nurse's notes. March 2025- blank box on 3/21/25. R1' Progress Notes do not include a nurses note for 2/24/25 as to why R1's wound care was not completed. R1 was hospitalized [DATE]-[DATE]. Upon R1's return to the facility on 1/23/25 there was not a full assessment of R1's wounds. R1's Admission/Readmission/Routine Head to Toe Evaluation dated 1/23/25 documents the following: .Skin integrity .Site #42 LLE (left lower extremity) (front) bilateral lower extremity unna boot, multiple open areas. Site #41 RLE (right lower extremity) Bilateral lower extremity unna boot, multiple open areas. Is worse looking than left leg. Bilateral feet 3+ pitting edema . On 4/30/25 at 11:40 AM, Surveyor interviewed RN D (Registered Nurse) regarding signing out treatments on the TAR. RN D indicated if the TAR is blank, the treatment was not completed. RN D indicated if there is a number 4 on the TAR, that means there should be a progress note made in the resident's chart on why the treatment was not completed. On 4/30/25 at 11:50 AM, Surveyor interviewed LPN E (Licensed Practical Nurse) regarding signing out treatments on the TAR. LPN E indicated if the TAR is blank, the treatment was not completed. LPN E indicated a number 4 on the TAR means there should be a progress note regarding the treatment. On 4/30/25 at 12:00 PM, Surveyor interviewed RN F regarding signing out treatments on the TAR. RN F indicated if it is not documented then it was not done and a number 4 on the TAR would indicate there is a progress note related to the treatment. On 4/30/25 at 2:08 PM, Surveyor interviewed ADON/WN C (Assistant Director of Nursing/Wound Nurse) regarding signing out treatments on the TAR. ADON/WN C indicated a 4 would mean there is a progress note about the treatment and if the TAR is blank, it means the treatment was not completed. ADON/WN C indicated treatments should be completed and signed out. On 4/30/25 at 2:25 PM, Surveyor interviewed DON B (Director of Nursing) regarding signing out treatments on the TAR. DON B indicated if a nurse charts a 4 on the TAR, then the nurse would make a progress note about the treatment. DON B indicated if the TAR is blank, then the treatment was not completed. DON B indicated all treatments should be completed or a note made for why it was not completed. DON B stated she expects treatments to completed. On 4/30/25 at 3:51 PM, Surveyor interviewed ADON/WN C. Surveyor asked ADON/WN C if there should have been a full assessment of R1's wounds to BLE's (bilateral lower extremities) upon return from the hospital on 1/23/25, ADON/WN C stated, yes there should have been. On 4/30/25 at 5:10 PM, Surveyor interviewed DON B. Surveyor asked DON B if she would have expected there to have been a full assessment of R1's wound to BLE's upon return from the hospital, DON B stated yes.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pressure Ulcer Prevention (Tag F0686)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure each resident received care, consistent with professional stan...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure each resident received care, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent pressure injuries (PI) for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for pressure injuries. The facility did not complete wound care as ordered for R2. This is evidenced by: The facility's policy titled Wound Treatment Management, dated 2/14/23, includes: To promote wound healing of various types of wounds, it is the policy of this facility to provide evidence-based treatments in accordance with current standards of practice and physician orders. Wound treatments will be provided in accordance with physician orders, including the cleansing method, type of dressing, and frequency of dressing change. Treatments will be documented on the Treatment Administration Record or in the electronic health record. R2 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 1/31/25. R2's Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for December 2024 includes the following: Sacrum wound; Cleanse with Vashe wound cleanser (a solution used for cleaning wounds) or equivalent, apply skin prep to peri-wound, apply hydrofera blue classic (a type of wound dressing that provides antibacterial protection) to wound bed, cover with ABD (absorbent gauze pad) and secure with mediflex tape (a type of tape to secure dressings) daily. Start date 12/5/24. Discontinued dated 12/18/24. R2's TAR indicates 12/15/24 and 12/16/24 are blank. Sacrum wound; Cleanse with Vashe wound cleanser (a solution used for cleaning wounds) or equivalent, apply skin prep to peri-wound, apply hydrofera blue classic (a type of wound dressing that provides antibacterial protection) to wound bed, cover with foam dressing twice daily. Start 12/19/24 Discontinued 1/8/25. R2's TAR indicates 12/19/24 and 12/25/24 are blank. R2's TAR indicates there is no documentation of the wound care being completed a second time from 12/19/24 through 12/31/24. B/L (bilateral, both) ischial tuberosities (the part of the pelvis that supports your weight when you're seated): Cleanse with Vashe wound cleanser or equivalent, apply skin prep to peri-wound, lightly pack with hydrofera blue classic, cover with hydralock (super absorbent dressing) 4 x 4, then abd pad, and secure with medi-flex tape once daily. Use betadine swabs to macerated wound edges every day and evening shift for wound care. Start Date 12/11/24 1500 (3:00 PM). Discontinued 12/18/24 1513 (3:13 PM). R2's TAR indicates 12/15/24 and 12/16/24 are blank. R2's TAR indicates 12/14/25 is blank. B/L (bilateral, both) ischial tuberosities (the part of the pelvis that supports your weight when you're seated): Cleanse with Vashe wound cleanser or equivalent, apply skin prep to peri-wound, lightly pack with hydrofera blue classic, cover with hydralock (super absorbent dressing) 4 x 4, secure with foam dressings. Use betadine swabs to macerated wound edges every day and evening shift for wound care. Start dated 12/19/24 0700 (7:00 AM). Discontinued 1/8/25 1216 (12:16 PM). R2's TAR indicates 12/19/24 and 12/25/24 day shifts are blank. R2's TAR indicates 12/22/24 and 12/25/24 evening shifts are blank. R2's TAR for January 2025 includes the following: B/L ischial tuberosities: Cleanse with Vashe wound cleanser or equivalent, apply skin prep to peri-wound, lightly pack with hydrofera blue classic, cover with hydralock 4 x 4 secure with foam dressing Use betadine swabs to macerated wound edges every day and evening shift for wound care Start 12/19/24 Discontinue 1/8/25. R2's TAR indicates 1/5/25 is blank for day shift. R2's TAR indicates 1/2/25 is blank for evening shift. Cleanse B/L ischial tuberosity wounds and sacrum with vashe or equivalent wound cleanser, protect peri wound with skin prep, lightly pack with Ca alginate and cover with Hydralock dressing then ABD, Secure with mepilex tape once daily and as needed if dressing soiled or loose every day shift for wound care Start date 1/23/25. Discontinued 3/25/25. R2's TAR indicates 1/28/25 and 1/30/25 are blank. Sacrum wound; Cleanse with Vashe wound cleanser (a solution used for cleaning wounds) or equivalent, apply skin prep to peri-wound, apply hydrofera blue classic (a type of wound dressing that provides antibacterial protection) to wound bed, cover with foam dressing twice daily. Start 12/19/24 Discontinued 1/8/25. R2's TAR indicates 1/5/25 is blank. R2's TAR indicates there is no documentation of the wound care being completed a second time from 1/1/25 through 1/7/25. Sacrum: Cleanse with vashe or equivalent wound cleanser, protect peri wound with skin prep and apply foam dressing daily and as needed every day shift for wound care Start 1/20/25. Discontinue 1/15/25. R2's TAR indicates 1/12/25 through 1/15/25 is blank. On 4/30/25 at 11:40 AM, Surveyor interviewed RN D (Registered Nurse) regarding signing out treatments on the Treatment Administration Record (TAR). RN D indicated if the TAR is blank, the treatment was not completed. RN D indicated if there is a number 4 on the TAR, that means there should be a progress note made in the resident's chart on why the treatment was not completed. On 4/30/25 at 11:50 AM, Surveyor interviewed LPN E (Licensed Practical Nurse) regarding signing out treatments on the TAR. LPN E indicated if the TAR is blank, the treatment was not completed. LPN E indicated a number 4 on the TAR means there should be a progress note regarding the treatment. On 4/30/25 at 12:00 PM, Surveyor interviewed RN F (Registered Nurse) regarding signing out treatments on the TAR. RN F indicated if it is not documented then it was not done and a number 4 on the TAR would indicate there is a progress note related to the treatment. On 4/30/25 at 2:08 PM, Surveyor interviewed ADON/WN C (Assistant Director of Nursing/Wound Nurse) regarding signing out treatments on the TAR. ADON/WN C indicated a 4 would mean there is a progress note about the treatment and if the TAR is blank, it means the treatment was not completed. ADON/WN C indicated treatments should be completed and signed out. On 4/30/25 at 2:25 PM, Surveyor interviewed DON B (Director of Nursing) regarding signing out treatments on the TAR. DON B indicated if a nurse charts a 4 on the TAR, then the nurse would make a progress note about the treatment. DON B indicated if the TAR is blank, then the treatment was not completed. DON B indicated all treatments should be completed or a note made for why it was not completed. DON B stated she expects treatments to completed. Of note, R2's treatment to his sacrum was not documented as completed 26 times between December 2024 and January 2025. R2's treatment to his bilateral tuberosity wounds was not documented as completed 11 times between December 2024 and January 2025.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 1 resident's (R2) reviewed for smoking/vaping. The facility...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure each resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 1 resident's (R2) reviewed for smoking/vaping. The facility failed to re-assess and update R2's care plan for safety after being observed vaping in the facility. This is evidenced by: The facility's policy titled Resident Smoking, dated 7/10/25, includes the following: It is the guideline of this facility to provide a safe and healthy environment for residents, visitors, and employees, including safety as related to smoking. Safety protections apply to smoking and non-smoking residents. Smoking is prohibited in all areas except the designated smoking area. Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes/vape/vapor pen) can catch on fire and/or explode if not handled and stored safely. Safety measures for the use of electronic cigarettes by residents will include but are not limited to: Use of e-cigarettes in designated smoking areas only. A safe smoking assessment will be completed on all residents using e-cigarettes. Any resident who is deemed safe to smoke .will be allowed to smoke in designated smoking areas . A Risk vs. Benefit Evaluation may be conducted by facility staff if a resident is exercising rights that may cause risk or harm to themselves. A resident does not have the right to put others at risk within or on grounds of the facility and the right to smoke may be revoked immediately. If a resident or family does not abide by the smoking policy or care plan .the plan of care may be revised to include additional safety measures and may include a Smoking Contract. R2's Smoking evaluation dated 12/30/24 includes the following: Does resident need facility to store lighter and cigarettes? No Plan of care is used to assure resident is safe while smoking? Yes Is the resident a supervised or unsupervised smoke? Unsupervised R2's comprehensive care plan printed on 4/29/25 includes the following: Focus: The resident is a smoker. Interventions: Instruct resident about the facility policy on smoking: locations, times, safety concerns. The resident can smoke unsupervised. The resident's smoking supplies are stored on his person. R2's nurse progress notes include the following: 1/11/25 1:20 PM . pt (R2) up in w/c vaping . Of note, this was in the facility when R2 was speaking to the nurse about wound treatments. 1/13/25 1:54 PM .when this writer entered room and noted pt (R2) vaping, this writer attempted to educate pt that he is not to be vaping in room. Pt shrugged his shoulders with a smile on his face and then took a long drag on the vape. Of note, R2 did not have a new smoking assessment completed and did not have his care plan updated after the 2 incidents of non-compliance when vaping in the facility. On 4/30/25 at 3:00 PM, Surveyor interviewed ADON/WN C (Assistant Director of Nursing/Wound Nurse) regarding R2's vaping. Surveyor asked ADONWN C if R2 should have had a new smoking assessment, care plan review, or IDT (Intradisciplinary Team) meeting/progress note regarding his non-compliance with the facility's smoking policy. ADON/WN C indicated something should have been done but was not. On 4/30/25 at 2:25 PM, Surveyor interviewed DON B (Director of Nursing) regarding R2's vaping. DON B indicated vaping was treated the same as smoking and all vaping should be done outside in the designated smoking areas. DON B indicated a new smoking assessment should have been completed and R2 should have turned in his vape supplies but did not.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0760 (Tag F0760)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure residents are free of any significant medication errors for 1 o...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure residents are free of any significant medication errors for 1 of 1 resident's (R2) reviewed for medications. The facility did not ensure R2 was provided his Seroquel (Antipsychotic medications) for several days. This is evidenced by: The facility policy titled Medication Error Reporting and Counseling Procedure, dated 12/12/23, includes the following: Medication errors .should be reviewed for the potential of a negative outcome. When a medication error occurs, the licensed nurse/employee needs to be able to report the error .to Nursing Management. The facility should consider reporting the error to their contracted pharmacy provider for any desired information or needed follow-up. A prompt assessment of the resident(s) involved to be completed to determine harm or the potential risks to the resident. Three general guidelines in determining whether a medication error is significant or not: resident condition, drug category and frequency of error. The facility will inform the primary or prescribing physician(s) of the medication error in a timely manner and document notification in the medical record. This communication will help ensure that appropriate corrective measures can be taken, and future medication orders can be adjusted, if necessary. R2 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of schizophrenia. R2's physician orders include the following: Seroquel oral tablet 25 mg give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day related to Schizophrenia Start date 11/21/24 8:00 AM. Seroquel oral tablet 25 mg give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day related to Schizophrenia Start date 11/21/24 12:00 PM Seroquel oral tablet 25 mg give 2 tablets by mouth one time a day related to Schizophrenia Start date 11/21/24 4:00 PM R2's nurse progress notes include the following: 12/21/24 at 5:29 PM Seroquel oral tablet 25 MG . none in cart on order. 12/22/24 at 5:28 PM Seroquel oral tablet 25 MG .on order 12/23/24 at 5:35 PM Seroquel oral tablet 25 MG .on order 12/24/24 at 5:24 PM Seroquel oral tablet 25 MG .on order 12/25/24 at 10:23 AM Seroquel oral tablet 25 MG .waiting for delivery 12/25/24 at 12:27 PM Seroquel oral tablet 25 MG .waiting on delivery 12/25/24 at 4:15 PM Seroquel oral tablet 25 MG .on order 12/26/24 at 4:46 PM Seroquel oral tablet 25 MG . (no documentation) 12/27/24 at 6:53 PM Seroquel oral tablet 25 MG . on order 12/29/24 at 11:16 AM Seroquel oral tablet 25 MG . (no documentation) 12/29/24 at 4:14 PM Seroquel oral tablet 25 MG .awaiting delivery of medication 12/30/24 at 8:37 PM Seroquel oral tablet 25 MG . not in cart On 4/29/25 at 3:10 PM, Surveyor asked LPN G (Licensed Practical Nurse) to show surveyor what medications are in the facility's contingency medication supply. LPN G showed surveyor the facility's contingency supply contained Seroquel 25 mg. LPN G stated the contingency supply is usually 8 to 10 pills of the medication. On 4/29/25 at 11:40 AM, Surveyor interviewed RN D (Registered Nurse) regarding administering medications. RN D indicated if a resident does not have a medication, the nursing staff is supposed to look in the facility's contingency medication supply and pull the medication from there to give to the resident. RN D also stated the staff is supposed to call pharmacy and ask to have the medication delivered and to notify the physician. RN D indicated this should all be documented in the resident's medical record. Surveyor asked what the facility would do if a resident did not get the medication delivered and now it was the second day, and the resident still does not have the medication. RN D indicated the facility would call the pharmacy and have the medication stat delivered which means the medication should be there within 4 hours. Surveyor asked what the process would be if a resident did not have a medication on the third day. RN D indicated she has never had it get that far before. On 4/29/25 at 11:50 AM, Surveyor interviewed LPN E regarding administering medications. LPN E indicated on day one of a resident not having medication, the facility should look in the contingency medication supply and call pharmacy to order it. LPN E indicated the physician should also be notified. On day two of a resident not having medication, LPN E stated she would notify DON B (Director of Nursing). On day three of a resident not having a medication, LPN E indicated she would ask the provider for a substitute. On day four, LPN E indicated she would call the physician and do an assessment. LPN E indicated it is unacceptable for a resident to be without medication for four days. On 4/29/25 at 2:08 PM, Surveyor interviewed ADON/WN C (Assistant Director of Nursing/Wound Nurse) regarding medication administration. ADON/WN C indicated on day one of a resident not having medication, the staff should look in the contingency medication supply, call the physician and call pharmacy to have the medication stat delivered. Day two, the staff should notify the physician, call pharmacy and notify their supervisor. ADON/WN C indicated there should not be a day three. On 4/29/25 at 2:25 PM, Surveyor interviewed DON B (Director of Nursing) regarding medication administration. DON B indicated if a resident does not have medication, on day one, the facility should check in the contingency medication supply, call pharmacy, and call the provider. On day two, the staff should call again. On day three, staff should call the physician, and the facility would have to call the head of pharmacy because there is a problem. On day four, the staff should do the same thing, call the pharmacy, and call the physician. DON B indicated an assessment needs to be done daily based on the missed medication. DON B indicated all of this should be documented in the resident's medical record. DON B stated missed medications is a medication error and a risk management should be completed. Surveyor notified DON B that surveyor was unable to locate any documentation of a completed assessment for the missed medication, the pharmacy being notified, or the physician being notified of the missed Seroquel for R2 for the dates of 12/21/24 through 12/30/24. DON B did not provide surveyor with any documentation regarding R2's missed Seroquel for those dates.
Sept 2024 20 deficiencies 2 Harm
SERIOUS (G)

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Deficiency F0760 (Tag F0760)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that residents were free of any significant medication errors ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that residents were free of any significant medication errors for 1 of 1 resident (R57) reviewed for significant medication errors. R57 did not receive scheduled insulin at 8:00AM on 7/24/24 and did not have blood glucose monitoring in place. R57 was hospitalized on the evening of 7/24/24 with acute hyperglycemia (a medical emergency that occurs when blood sugar levels are extremely high) requiring treatment with insulin drip (administration of insulin through intravenous line.) Evidenced by: Facility policy entitled Medication Administration, dated 05/2024, states in part: Policy: Medications are administered by licensed nurses .as ordered by the physician and in accordance with professional standards of practice . 20. Sign MAR (Medication Administration Record) after administered . R57 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include, in part: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus without complications (a condition that occurs when the body doesn't produce enough insulin or can't use insulin properly, resulting in high blood sugar levels.) Of note, R57 was admitted from the hospital after being treated for hyperglycemia. R57's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 8/7/24 indicates that R57 has a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) of 15, indicating R57 is cognitively intact. R57's physician orders dated 7/23/24, state in part: insulin glargine (Lantus) 20 units subcutaneous once a day (in the morning). It is important to note there were no physician orders for monitoring blood glucose levels. R57's MAR (Medication Administration Record) for July 2024 shows: 7/24/24 8:00 AM--Medication not administered. Important to note: R57's TAR (Treatment Administration Record) for July 2024 shows no record of blood glucose monitoring on 7/23/24 or 7/24/24. R57's SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment, and Recommendation) Communication Form and Progress Note dated 7/24/24 8:00PM states, in part: .resident yelled out for help, writer went to resident's room. Resident stated he did not feel well. Resident diaphoretic (sweating), shaking, cold to touch, BP (blood pressure) low. Glucometer (device to test blood sugar level) reads HI (reading beyond the level which the machine can report). R57's Nephrology Consult Note dated 7/25/24, states, in part: .sent back to the ED (emergency department), where his BS (blood sugar) was noted to be in the 900's. Was started on an insulin drip. R57's hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE], states, in part: Discharge Diagnosis: acute hyperglycemia . On 09/10/24 at 8:03 AM, Surveyor interviewed R57, who indicated being hospitalized after admission to facility due to blood sugar issues. On 09/12/24 at 8:26 AM, Surveyor interviewed LPN O (Licensed Practical Nurse) and asked what interventions would be expected for a new admission with a diagnosis of diabetes. LPN O stated accu checks (blood glucose checks / monitoring), insulin or oral meds as needed, parameters, glucagon gel or injection, diet. Surveyor asked what the process would be if there were no blood glucose checks ordered for a new admission. LPN O stated call the physician and double check to ensure it wasn't missed. Surveyor asked if medications are signed for on the MAR when they are administered. LPN O said yes. On 9/12/24 at 9:19 AM, Surveyor reviewed the July 2024 MAR with LPN O and asked if the Lantus ordered for R57 at 8:00AM on 7/24/24 was given. LPN O stated no, it isn't signed out. On 9/12/24 at 8:37 AM, Surveyor interviewed LPN E and asked if blood glucose checks / monitoring would be expected for a new admission with diagnosis of diabetes. LPN E stated yes. Surveyor asked what the process would be if there were no blood glucose checks ordered. LPN E stated check with the doctor. Surveyor asked if medications are signed for on the MAR when they are administered. LPN E stated yes. On 09/12/24 at 9:33 AM, Surveyor interviewed DON B (Director of Nursing) and asked if staff is expected to follow physician orders. DON B stated yes. Surveyor asked if nurses should be signing out meds at the time they are given. DON B stated yes. Surveyor asked if a medication is not signed out on the MAR has it been administered. DON B stated no. Surveyor reviewed July 2024 MAR with DON B and asked if the Lantus had been administered on 7/24/24. DON B said no, that was not given. Surveyor asked if DON B would expect Lantus to be administered if ordered? DON B stated yes. Surveyor asked DON B if blood glucose checks would be expected to be ordered and checked for a resident on Lantus? DON B stated yes, if there is no order, ask the doctor for orders. Surveyor asked DON B is it possible that if R57 had received his Lantus at 8am that the hospitalization would have been avoided. DON B stated yes. On 9/12/24 at 3:18 PM, Surveyor interviewed NP N (Nurse Practitioner) and asked would you expect the facility to administer medications as orders? NP N stated yes. Reviewed MAR indicating that R57 had not received his insulin on 7/24/24 and asked if NP N would expect the facility to have administered this insulin? NP N stated yes. Surveyor asked NP N is it possible that if the facility had administered his AM insulin, his blood sugar would not have been registering high. NP N stated it is not a yes or no, potentially. Surveyor asked NP N if administration of the Lantus may have prevented the need for the insulin drip. NP N stated yes, it is possible. Surveyor asked NP N if the facility had been monitoring blood glucose checks on a regular basis if the need for hospitalization may have been prevented. NP N stated yes. Surveyor asked if NP N would expect that the facility would inquire about doing blood glucose monitoring if R57 was admitted without orders and was on Lantus. NP N stated yes.
SERIOUS (G)

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Antibiotic Stewardship (Tag F0881)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure they followed their Antibiotic Stewardship program that includ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure they followed their Antibiotic Stewardship program that includes antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor antibiotic use for 2 of 6 sampled residents (R16 and R34) and 1 supplemental resident (R612) reviewed for antibiotic stewardship. R16 is being cited at severity level 3 (actual harm). R34 and R612 are being cited at severity level 2 (potential for more than minimal harm). The facility did not follow Standards of Practice for Antibiotic Stewardship: R16 has a history of antibiotic resistance and was prescribed antibiotics without meeting criteria. R16 was prescribed antibiotics for five events between March 26, 2024 and July 5, 2024, for asymptomatic bacteremia (presence of bacteria that does not cause symptoms thus not requiring antibiotic treatment). The facility did not thoroughly review R16's urine culture and sensitivities, and therefore, did not recognize R16 had developed resistance to a prescribed antibiotic. R34 was prescribed an antibiotic for Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) twice in the month of July without meeting criteria. R612 was prescribed and received an antibiotic for Acute Kidney Injury (AKI). R612 did not meet criteria for the prescribed antibiotic. Evidenced by: The facility policy titled Antibiotic Stewardship Program with a date of 12/23/22, states in part: It is the policy of this facility to implement and Antibiotic Stewardship Program as part of the facility's overall infection prevention and control program. The purpose of the program is to optimize the treatment of infections while reducing the adverse events associated with antibiotic use . 4. The program includes antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor antibiotic use . ii. Laboratory testing shall be in accordance with current standards of practice. iii. The facility uses the (CDC's NHSN Surveillance Definitions, updated McGeer criteria, or other surveillance tool) to define infections. iv. The Loeb Minimum Criteria may be used to determine whether to treat an infection with antibiotics. v. All prescriptions for antibiotics shall specify the dose, duration, and indication for use. vi. Whenever possible, narrow-spectrum antibiotics that are appropriate for the condition being treated shall be utilized . Antibiotic orders obtained from consulting, specialty, or emergency providers shall be reviewed for appropriateness . According to National Institutes of Health (NIH), Asymptomatic bacteriuria is very common in clinical practice and its incidence increases with age .most patients with asymptomatic bacteriuria will never develop symptomatic urinary tract infections and will have no adverse consequences from asymptomatic bacteriuria . most patients will not benefit from treatment (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). The facility form titled Infection Report Form is used for the facility's infection control program. The Infection Report Form identifies criteria that must be present to meet surveillance criteria for an infection. Example 1 R16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R16's medical diagnoses list does not indicate any diagnoses related to UTI or Multidrug-Resistant Organism (MDRO). R16's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] states in part, Section I Active Diagnoses Infections does not have a check mark for I1700. Multidrug-Resistant Organism (MDRO), I2300. Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) (LAST 30 DAYS). This indicates R16 does not have an MDRO and does not currently have a UTI and has not had a UTI in the previous 30 days. Event 1 R16's 3/22/24 Urine Culture and Sensitivity Report states, in part: >100,000 cfu/ml Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolated. 30,000 cfu/ml Mixed flora (multiple species present). Resistant to Oxacillin, Penicillin G, and Tetracycline (antibiotics). R16's 3/21/24 Infection Report Form (facility form used for antibiotic stewardship) does not have any criteria marked under the UTI section, indicating R16 has no symptoms of UTI. Of note, R16 does not meet criteria. In the follow up section the report states Resident returned from appt (appointment) - order for UA (urinalysis)/microalbum, creatinine. Asymptomatic bacteremia [sic] (presence of bacteria that does not cause symptoms). Of note, the follow up section indicates the urinalysis was obtained as a routine lab from a consulting provider. R16's March 2024 Medication Administration Record (MAR) indicates R16 received 4 doses of Bactrim DS oral tablet 800-160 for asymptomatic bacteremia. Event 2 R16's 4/4/24 Urine Culture and Sensitivity Report states, in part: >100,000 cfu/ml Enterococcus faecalis isolated. Resistant to Gentamicin and Tetracycline. 30,000 cfu/ml Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated. Of note, this is the same bacteria as the previous event. Resistant to Oxacillin, Penicillin G, and Tetracycline. R16's 3/26/24 Infection Report Form, in section two of UTI criteria, has marked At least 105 cfu/ml or no more than 2 species of microorganisms in a voided urine sample. Of note, section one of the UTI criteria has no marks, indicating R16 does not meet criteria. R16's 4/5/24 physician order states, Bactrim DS 800-160 give one tablet by mouth two times a day for UTI until 4/11/24. R16's April 2024 MAR indicates R16 received 12 doses of Bactrim DS 800-160 for asymptomatic bacteremia. R16's 4/24/24 Urine Culture and Sensitivity Report states, in part: >100,000 cfu/ml Enterococcus faecalis isolated. Resistant to Gentamicin and Tetracycline. 20,000 cfu/ml Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated. Resistant to Oxacillin, Penicillin G, and Tetracycline. Of note, these are both the same bacteria as the previous event. Event 3 R16's 4/24/24 Infection Report Form does not have any criteria marked under the UTI section, indicating R16 has no symptoms of UTI. Of note, R16 does not meet criteria. In the follow up section the report states, switched to this after report next to Nitrofurantoin (antibiotic) 100 mg po (by mouth) BID (twice a day), indicating the Amoxicillin (antibiotic) order was discontinued and changed to Nitrofurantoin. R16's 4/25/24 physician order states Amoxicillin 500 MG give 1 tablet by mouth four times a day for UTI. R16's physician order on 4/29/24 states Nitrofurantoin Macrocrystal oral capsule 100 MG give one capsule by mouth two times a day for UTI for 14 days. R16's April 2024 and May 2024 MAR indicates R16 received 13 doses of Amoxicillin 500 MG and 27 doses of Nitrofurantoin 100 MG. R16 received antibiotics for a total of 18 days. Of note this is the 3rd time R16 was treated and had asymptomatic bacteremia. A 5/2/24 Urology note states in part; Recent MRSA (Methicillin Resistant Staph Aureus and Enterococcus UTI known to be a MRSA carrier-probably the MRSA is could be [sic] primary source in the bladder or could be secondary and seeding from somewhere else staff [sic] is known to do that. Event 4 R16's 6/4/24 Urine Culture and Sensitivity Report states, in part: >100,000 cfu/ml Proteus mirabilis isolated. Resistant to Ampicillin, Gentamicin, Nitrofurantoin, Tetracycline, and Trimethoprim/Sulfa (is also known as Bactrim DS). Of note, R16 is now resistant to Bactrim DS and Nitrofurantoin. R16's 6/5/24 Infection Report Form, in section two of UTI criteria, has marked At least 105 cfu/ml or no more than 2 species of microorganisms in a voided urine sample. Of note, section one of the UTI criteria has no marks, indicating R16 does not meet criteria. In the follow up section the report states Asymptomatic Bacteremia [sic]. R16's 6/5/24 physician order states Keflex Oral Capsule 500 MG (antibiotic) give 500 mg by mouth four times a day for UTI for 5 days. R16's June 2024 MAR indicates R16 received 20 doses of Keflex. Event 5 R16's 7/2/24 Urine Culture and Sensitivity Report states, in part: >100,000 cfu/ml Proteus mirabilis isolated. Of note, this is the same bacteria as the previous event. Resistant to Ampicillin, Gentamicin, Nitrofurantoin, Tetracycline, and Trimethoprim/Sulfa. R16's 7/2/24 Infection Report Form does not have any criteria marked under the UTI section, indicating R16 has no symptoms of UTI. Of note, R16 does not meet criteria. In the follow up section the report states Asymptomatic Bacteremia [sic]. R16's 7/2/24 physician order states Nitrofurantoin 100 MG give 1 capsule by mouth two times a day for UTI for 10 days. Of note, R16's previous culture and sensitivity noted R16 was resistant to Nitrofurantoin. R16's 7/5/24 physician order states Cipro oral tablet 500 MG (broad spectrum antibiotic) give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day for UTI for 10 days. R16's July 2024 MAR indicates R16 received 6 doses of Nitrofurantoin and 20 doses of Cipro. On 9/12/24 at 8:33AM, Surveyor interviewed DON B (Director of Nursing). DON B indicated she oversees and participates in the infection prevention program. DON B indicated R16 has had no symptoms for these five events. Surveyor asked DON B if R16's asymptomatic bacteriuria should be treated. DON B indicated if a resident is asymptomatic, not showing signs of UTI, the facility should not treat. DON B indicated she expects antibiotic stewardship to be followed. Surveyor asked DON B if the prescribing physicians have been educated on antibiotic stewardship for R16's asymptomatic bacteriuria. DON B could not present evidence that the facility has educated the physicians regarding treating asymptomatic bacteremia. Example 2 R34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder (bladder muscles are not functioning properly, causing problems with urination) and paraplegia (affects the ability to move or feel the lower half of the body). R34's 7/11/24 Urine Culture and Sensitivity Report states >100,000 cfu/ml Mixed flora (multiple species present). Suggest appropriate recollection if clinically indicated. Of note, mixed flora is indicative of a contaminated urine sample. R34's 7/11/24 Infection Report Form does not have any criteria marked under the UTI section, indicating R34 has no symptoms of UTI. Of note, R34 does not meet criteria. R34's 7/11/24 physician order states Cefpodoxime Proxetil oral tablet 200 MG (antibiotic) give 1 tablet by mouth every 12 hours for 10 days for UTI. R34's July 2024 MAR indicates R34 received 5 doses of Cefpodoxime Proxetil 200 MG. On 9/12/24 at 8:33AM, Surveyor interviewed DON B (Director of Nursing). DON B indicated she oversees and participates in the infection prevention program. DON B indicated the facility did not obtain a recollection of urine for R34 per the recommendations of the 7/11/24 Urine Culture and Sensitivity Report. Example 3 R612 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include benign prostatic hyperplasia without lower urinary tract symptoms (enlarged prostate). R612's 6/29/24 Urine Culture and Sensitivity Report states 70,000 cfu/ml Mixed flora (multiple species present). R612's 6/27/24 Infection Report Form does not have any criteria marked under the UTI section, indicating R612 has no symptoms of UTI. In the follow up section, the report indicates the antibiotic ordered was for an acute kidney injury. Of note, R612 does not meet criteria. R612's 6/29/24 physician order states Macrobid Oral Capsule 100 MG (antibiotic) give 1 capsule by mouth two times a day for UTI for 5 days. R612's June 2024 and July 2024 MARs indicate R612 received Macrobid for 4 days (8 doses). On 7/2/24, after R612 received 4 days of Macrobid, physician discontinued the order. Nurses progress notes dated 7/2/24 at 14:19 (2:19PM) states in part Dr. (Doctor's name) responded back to the UA (Urinalysis) stating that it does not appear that R612 has a UTI .you may discontinue this medication. On 9/12/24 at 8:33AM, Surveyor interviewed DON B (Director of Nursing). DON B indicated she oversees and participates in the infection prevention program. DON B agreed R612 did not meet criteria for an antibiotic and should not have received the antibiotic. The facility treated R16's asymptomatic bacteriuria five times. R16 now has resistance to Nitrofurantoin. R34 and R612 received treatment for UTIs that did not meet criteria. DON B indicated the facility did not follow antibiotic stewardship.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Grievances (Tag F0585)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure grievances were documented and thoroughly resolv...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure grievances were documented and thoroughly resolved for 1 of 24 sampled residents (R23). R23 reported a grievance regarding her Hoyer (full body lift) transfers, and this was not documented or thoroughly resolved. R23 reported a grievance regarding an interaction with a staff member and this was not documented or thoroughly resolved. Evidenced by: The facility policy, Grievance Guideline, revised on 5/31/23, indicates, in part: Purpose: To provide a process to voice grievances (such as those about treatment, care .or violation of rights) and respond with prompt efforts to resolve while keeping the resident and/or representative appropriately apprised of progress toward resolution . Guideline: .Filing a Grievance .A grievance or concern may be expressed orally or in writing to the Grievance Officer or facility staff .Grievances may be given to any staff member who will forward the grievance to the Grievance Officer, or they may file the grievance anonymously .Response: Any employee of this facility who receives a complaint shall immediately attempt to resolve the complaint within their role and authority. If a complaint cannot be immediately resolved the employee shall escalate that complaint to their supervisor and the facility Grievance Official. Grievances will be recorded and logged through Grievance Portal or written Grievance Form. Upon receipt of a grievance or concerns, the Grievance Official will review the grievance, determine immediately if the grievance meets a reportable complaint consistent with the facility Abuse Prevention Policy .The Grievance Officer will initiate the appropriate notification and investigation processes per individual circumstances and facility guidelines .Resolution: The Grievance Official and/or designee will complete a response within 5 days of receipt to the resident and/or resident representative which includes: Date of grievance, Summary of grievance, Investigation steps, Findings, Resolution outcome and actions taken with the date decision was determined . Example 1 R23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R23's Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Care Plan, with a revision date of 5/2/23, indicates R23 requires staff intervention to complete ADL's. Interventions include, in part: .Hoyer (full body lift) sling with hole cut out for bed side commode toileting needs. On 9/9/24 at 3:00 PM, Surveyor interviewed R23 who indicated the facility now has a different Hoyer lift that is too short and so when the staff transfer her from her bed to the commode, they cannot lift her high enough and her buttock rubs across the bed which also hurts her right hip and causes a burning sensation. R23 indicated she was told the Hoyer they use to have is being repaired but it has been a month. R23 indicated that DON B (Director of Nursing) and NSD W (Nutrition Services Director) were in her room when she was in the sling and were making suggestions, but that everything they tried did not work. Of note, NSD W, is also a CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant). On 9/10/24 at 4:25 PM, Surveyor interviewed CNA AA who indicated she does assist R23 from her bed to the bedside commode. CNA AA indicated she does not like the big boy Hoyer, it is the biggest one we have, and it causes friction on R23's bottom. CNA AA indicated they used to have a different one that was able to lift R23 all the way and this one is a rental, and it doesn't lift her all the way. CNA AA indicated that R23 isn't happy with this one because it rubs. CNA AA indicates that R23 does complain of pain with the transfers, mostly her bottom, but she has issues already with her legs and will complain of pain in her right hip. CNA AA indicated when she is done assisting R23 she will report to the nurse, not specifically that it is from rubbing, but states they know because CNA BB has told them. CNA AA indicated she knows staff have told nurses, DON B, ADON/IP C (Assistant Director of Nursing/Infection Preventionist), Maintenance Q. CNA AA indicated Surveyor should talk with CNA BB. On 9/10/24 at 4:52 PM, Surveyor interviewed CNA BB who indicated that R23 does rub across the bed when they get her up to the commode. CNA BB indicated the big boy Hoyer is new because the other one broke. They have been using this one for about a month. CNA BB indicated that DON B was in R23's room one night and saw the rubbing. CNA BB indicated she has reported to DON B that the rubbing causes R23 pain to her hips. CNA BB indicates when they added the weight scale, that's when it started not clearing. On 9/10/24 at 4:43 PM, Surveyor observed R23 being transferred with the Hoyer lift from her bed to the bedside commode. During the observation it was noted that the lift did not raise enough for R23 to be clear of the bed causing her buttock to rub across the bed during the transfer. R23 did not voice concerns with pain during this transfer. On 9/12/24 at 11:47 AM, Surveyor interviewed DON B who indicated staff had reported to her that the Hoyer they were using for R23 didn't raise high enough. DON B indicated this one has a scale on it and so it's a little lower and that it is a rental, and they are trying to get a new one. DON B indicated the staff were told to lower the bed as far as they can prior to moving R23 and she did not know it was still an issue or that it was causing pain. DON B indicated a grievance should have been filed. The facility failed to ensure all grievances were documented and resolved. Example 2 On 9/12/24 at approximately 10:16 AM, R23 requested to speak to Surveyor. R23 indicated that CNA L is rude and said to her that she can go home but you (R23) can't, and this made her feel rotten. R23 indicated she reported this to DON B in a letter. R23 then provided a copy of the letter to Surveyor. The letter has a date at the upper right corner of 1/8/24. The letter indicated that on this day R23 had a concern with CNA L's (Certified Nursing Assistant) response to her during a conversation in R23's room. The letter indicates, in part, that at one point in the conversation CNA L responded to R23 by saying: She (CNA L) said that she is going home, but you (R23) can't, you can't get up! I am going home to a nice comfortable house, but you can't because you can't move! R23 indicated she asked a CNA to make a copy of the note and put it under DON B's door and that she has done this before with concerns. However, during the interview she realized she had two copies of the letter and so is not sure if a copy was placed under DON B's door or if the staff member copied it and gave it back. R23 indicates no one has followed up with her on this. Of note, R23 was unable to provide the name of the CNA that copied the letter. On 9/12/24 at approximately 12:00 PM, Surveyor interviewed DON B and reviewed the letter from R23. DON B indicated she had never received any information about this incident. DON B indicated that sometimes she will get letters from R23. DON B indicated that if a staff member made the copy for R23, the concern should have been reported so they could follow through. DON B indicated she will speak with R23 and will begin staff education. The facility failed to ensure all grievances were documented and resolved.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0655 (Tag F0655)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that information from the baseline care plan was reviewed with...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that information from the baseline care plan was reviewed with the resident/resident representative and a copy of or summary of the care plan was provided to the resident/resident representative within 48 hours of admission for 1 of 3 residents (R27) reviewed for baseline care plan out of a sample of 24 residents. R27 did not have a baseline care plan review within 48 hours of admission. Evidenced by: The facility policy, entitled Baseline Care Plan dated February 2023, states, in part: .The baseline care plan will be developed within 48 hours of the resident's admission.A written summary of the baseline care plan shall be provided to the resident and representative . R27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include anoxic brain damage and personal history of traumatic brain injury. R27's Care Conference Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) note dated 6/18/24, states met with guardian. Discussed plan of care and discharge goals. Concerns addressed. No other questions or concerns. On 9/10/24 at 9:53 AM, Surveyor interviewed Guardian T who indicated not being involved in initial care planning and had desire to have been involved. On 9/11/24 at 11:32 AM, Surveyor interviewed MDS M (Minimum Data Set) and asked the process for initial care planning. MDS M stated that the initial care plan is created through the initial evaluation package (assessments completed in Electronic Health record by the nurse). MDS M stated the assessments will trigger items to build the care plan. MDS M indicated that after the initial care conference specificity is added to the care plan by MDS M. Surveyor asked if a copy of the care plan is given to the resident/resident representative. MDS M stated if it is requested. Surveyor asked how the initial care plan is communicated with the resident/representative. MDS M stated when we have their initial care conference, we discuss this. Surveyor asked when is initial care conference. MDS M stated within the first 72 hours. Surveyor asked when R27's initial care conference was held. MDS M stated 6/18/24. On 9/11/24 at 11:51 AM, Surveyor interviewed LPN O (Licensed Practical Nurse) and asked when the initial care plan is reviewed with resident/representative. LPN O stated at care conference, within a week, not 100% sure of the exact timing. Surveyor asked if nurses review the plan of care with the resident prior to the care conference. LPN O stated no. On 9/11/24 at 1:23 PM, Surveyor interviewed SW D (Social Worker) and asked when the initial care conference is held. SW D stated MDS M creates the schedule. SW D stated she does the admission care conference within 72 hours. Surveyor asked when the care plan is reviewed with the resident/representative. SW D stated at the care conference. On 9/11/24 at 2:17 PM, Surveyor interviewed DON B (Director of Nursing) and asked when the initial care conference is scheduled. DON B stated that SW D sets up the care conference within 48 hours, it might be 72 if it is over the weekend, but she gets them in right away. Surveyor asked if there is discussion with the resident/representative about the care plan prior to the care conference. DON B stated she could not say for sure. Surveyor informed DON B of MDS M and SW D stating that they are scheduling meetings for 72 hours and LPN O states that nurses do not discuss the initial care plan with the residents. Surveyor asked if DON B would expect that the staff was sharing the initial care plan with the resident/representative within 48 hours. DON B stated yes.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 of 3 (R54) residents reviewed for person-centered care plans out of 24 total sampled residents. R54's Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care plan was reviewed by Surveyor. The care plan does not contain R54's individualized preferences in regard to her left arm. Evidenced by: The facility policy, Comprehensive Care Plans, implemented 1/2024, indicates, in part: Policy: It is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment. .Definitions: Person-centered care means to focus on the resident as the locus of control and support the resident in making their own choices and having control over their daily lives . Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: . 1. The care planning process will include an assessment of the resident's strengths and needs and will incorporate the resident's personal and cultural preferences in developing goals of care . 3. The comprehensive care plan will describe, at a minimum, the following: a. The services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being . f. Resident specific interventions that reflect the resident's needs and preferences . R54 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include, in part: Hemiplegia .affecting left nondominant side (paralysis of one side of the body), Malignant Neoplasm of Brain (Cancerous Brain Tumor that can spread), Anxiety, and depression. R54's Minimum Data Set (MDS) Quarterly Assessment, dated 9/3/24, shows R54 has a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10, indicating R54 has a moderate cognitive impairment. On 9/10/24 at 10:01 AM, Surveyor interviewed R54 who indicated that she has nerve issues on the left side of her body after having two surgeries and is also paralyzed on the left side. R54 indicated that the staff do not pick up her left arm the way she needs them to so that it does not cause her pain. R54's ADL care plan, indicates in part: Focus: The resident has an ADL self-care performance deficit r/t (related to) Hemiplegia, Limited Mobility, Musculoskeletal Impairment. Date Initiated: 5/29/24. Revision on: 6/5/24 Goal: The resident will improve current level of function through the review date. Date Initiated: 5/29/24. Revision on: 6/5/24. Interventions, in part: 1/4 side rail x 2 for repositioning with cares. Date Initiated: 5/31/24. Bed Mobility: The resident requires substantial/max assistance by staff to turn and reposition in bed. Date initiated: 5/29/24. Revision on: 6/5/24. R54's Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) Bedside [NAME] indicates, in part: Bed Mobility: The resident requires substantial/max assistance by staff to turn and reposition in bed. Of note, no information regarding how to touch, move, or hold onto R54's left arm during movement/transfers was found on either the care plan or the CNA [NAME]. On 9/12/24 at 9:11 AM, Surveyor observed CNA CC and CNA L assist R54 from her recliner to her bed to provide a check and change of her brief. After R54 was in the bed, CNA CC was moving R54 and grabbed onto her left mid forearm during turning and R54 said, Ow. CNA CC then attempted to assist from the shoulder area and R54 said for her to stop, and she would do it herself because it hurt. During the cares R54 complained of dizziness and nausea when being turned side to side. After cares were completed, Surveyor interviewed CNA CC, and asked if she had been trained not to grab onto R54's left arm during cares by either the facility or R54 herself. CNA CC indicated R54 says don't touch it all the time. Surveyor asked CNA CC why she grabbed onto R54's left arm today if she asks her not to regularly. CNA CC indicated she felt it was just out of habit and that she usually says I'm going to lift your arm and R54 will breathe, and she will be ok. Surveyor asked CNA CC what she should do if a resident is complaining of pain/dizziness/nausea during cares. CNA CC indicated most of the time she will stop. On 9/12/24 at 12:07 PM, Surveyor interviewed DON B (Director of Nursing) and reviewed concern from R54, and observation of cares provided to R54 by CNA's. DON B indicated the CNA should have stopped when R54 had pain and dizziness and get the nurse to assess. DON B indicated staff should listen to the resident and how her arm should be moved and if they don't understand go get the nurse. DON B indicated staff should also slow down if R54 is having dizziness and nausea with the turning. DON B indicated R54's specific preferences should be care planned and are not.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0657 (Tag F0657)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Example 2 On 9/11/24 Surveyor was reviewing R14's chart for hospice information. Surveyor noted R14's paper chart contained a si...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Example 2 On 9/11/24 Surveyor was reviewing R14's chart for hospice information. Surveyor noted R14's paper chart contained a signed Wisconsin State DNR (Do Not Resuscitate) form from July 2024. Surveyor noted R14's code status of DNR in The Hospice Care Plan, Physician Orders and the Electronic Health Record (EHR) Banner. Surveyor reviewed the Facility Comprehensive Care Plan which indicated R14's code status as Full Code. On 9/12/24 at 8:41 AM, Surveyor interviewed MDS M (Minimum Data Set) who indicated he is responsible for updating care plans. MDS M indicated updates that occur between the quarterly care conferences, such as declines or a resident joining hospice, are discussed in morning meeting and he then updates the care plan. Surveyor reviewed R14's facility care plan, EHR banner, and signed Wisconsin DNR form with MDS M. MDS M indicated that he recalled R14 being admitted to hospice, that he must have missed updating her facility care plan, and that it should have been updated when the DNR form was signed. On 9/12/24 at 8:51 AM, Surveyor interviewed ADON/IP C and asked who is responsible for updating care plans. ADON/IP C indicated MDS M, and that herself and LPN E (Licensed Practical Nurse) assist as well. Surveyor reviewed R14's facility care plan, EHR banner, and the signed Wisconsin DNR form with ADON/IP C. ADON IP/C indicated the facility care plan should have been updated to show R14's correct code status. Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure each resident (R), or their representative had the right to participate in the care planning process for 2 of 24 total sampled Residents (R48 & R14). R48 indicated she does not have quarterly care plan meetings to discuss her care. R14's care plan was not revised to address her change in code status. This is evidenced by: Facility policy entitled 'Comprehensive Care Plans,' dated 8/22, states in part: Policy: It is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframe to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment.Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1. The care planning process will include an assessment of the resident's strengths and needs and will incorporate the resident's personal and cultural preferences in developing goals of care. Services provided or arranged by the facility, as outlined by the comprehensive care plan, shall be culturally competent and trauma informed. 2. The comprehensive care plan will be developed within 7 days after the completion of the comprehensive MDS assessment. All care assessment areas (CAAs) triggered by the MDS (Minimum Data Set) will be considered in developing the plan of care.3.f. Resident specific interventions that reflect the resident's needs and preferences and align with the resident's cultural identity, as indicated . 4. The comprehensive care plan will be prepared by an interdisciplinary team, that includes, but is not limited to a. The attending Physician or non-physician practitioner designee involved in the resident's care if the physician is unable to participate in the development of the care plan. b. A registered nurse with responsibility for the resident. c. A nurse aide with responsibility for the resident. d. A member of the food and nutrition service staff. e. The resident and the resident's representative, to the extent practicable. f. Other appropriate staff or professionals in discipline as determined by the resident's needs or as requested by the resident . 5 The comprehensive care plan will be reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each comprehensive and quarterly MDS assessment. 6. The comprehensive care plan will include measurable objectives and time frames to meet the resident's needs as identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment. The objectives will be utilized to monitor the resident's progress. Alternative interventions will be documented, as needed . Example 1 R48 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that include critical illness myopathy (weakness or fatigue of muscles), Acute respiratory distress syndrome, Morbid (severe) obesity, asthma, and acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (low oxygen). R48's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicates R48's Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) is a 15 out of 15, indicating R48 is cognitively intact. On 9/9/24 at 12:26 PM, Surveyor interviewed R48 during the initial screening process. Surveyor asked R48 if she has care plan meetings where they discuss her care and go over her care plans, R48 stated, No. Surveyor reviewed R48's medical record and was only able to locate a care conference completed in January of 2024 and July of 2024. R48 should have had another care planning conference between that time frame. On 9/10/24 at 5:07 PM, Surveyor interviewed SW D (Social Worker) regarding the care conferences. SW D indicated that the facility does do them annually and quarterly. SW D indicated that the MDS director plans the care conferences with the MDS schedule. SW D indicated she sets up the initial one with their admission. SW D was only able to locate a care conference on 7/8/24 and 1/3/24. SW D indicated that R48 should have another one (care meeting) between those two dates. On 9/11/24 around 11:00 AM, SW D came back and indicated she was not able to find documentation of a quarterly care plan meeting being done during that time. R48 was not able to participate or discuss her care in a care plan meeting between her admission/initial care conference and her most recent quarterly care conference.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0658 (Tag F0658)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that services provided by the facility meet professional standards of quality for 1 of 21 residents (R45) reviewed for orders out of ...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that services provided by the facility meet professional standards of quality for 1 of 21 residents (R45) reviewed for orders out of a total sample of 24. R45 received orders and those orders were not transcribed for two (2) days. This is evidenced by: The Facility's Policy and Procedure entitled Medication Orders dated 4/16/24, documents the following in part: .a. Handwritten Order Signed by the Physician- The charge nurse on duty at the time the order is received should note the order and enter it on the physician order sheet or electronic order format, if not written by the physician . R45's wound documentation shows that R45's right heel wound was healed on 6/21/24 with placement of graft. Documentation from R45's Physician dated 6/26/24 includes the following orders: 1) Ensure 1 bottle 2x (2 times) a day in-between meal 2) Daily dressing change of pressure ulcer of right foot 3) General surgery for debridement of the thumb of left hand 4) Keflex 500mg (milligrams) 1 cap (capsule) q (every) 8 hours x (times) 10 days (antibiotic medication) 5) Lipid profile soon 6) Month follow-up The facility has a grievance form that documents the following, in part: .Incident date: 6/26/24 . Grievance Details: The patient received orders via fax on 6/26/24 from .the primary care provider. Orders were delayed and not processed until 6/28/24. Summary of Investigation: After completed investigation, there is no disputing that the orders were not processed in a timely manner. There was a delay in treatment, but the patient had no adverse effects from delay. PCP (Primary Care Provider) as well as family aware of delay. Summary of Findings: The patient's orders were not processed by nursing in a timely manner. Summary of Actions Taken: All nursing staff educated on the importance of processing orders in a timely manner and education will be ongoing with Agency nurses as well. DON (Director of Nursing)/ADON (Assistant Director of Nursing) will randomly audit orders at the nurses' station to ensure compliance to education provided. [SIC] R45's Infection Report Form dated 6/28/24, documents the following, in part: .Site: Right Heel .Cellulitis, Soft Tissue, or Wound Infection .1. pus . It is important to note that R45's Physician wrote the above order for an antibiotic on 6/26/24. On 9/11/24 at 1:14 PM, Surveyor interviewed LPN O (Licensed Practical Nurse). Surveyor asked LPN O when orders should be transcribed, LPN O stated, The day received. On 9/11/24 at 2:48 PM, Surveyor interviewed ADON/IP C (Assistant Director of Nursing/Infection Preventionist). Surveyor asked ADON/IP C what she could recall about R45's orders from 6/26/24, ADON/IP C explained that the orders came on PM shift, R45's daughter was aware, R45's Physician called here and alerted us on 6/28/24; ADON/IP C said we apologized, filed a grievance, educated the staff, and are attempting to review randomly now. Surveyor asked ADON/IP C when orders should be transcribed, ADON/IP C stated when received. On 9/11/24 at 4:21 PM, Surveyor interviewed DON B (Director of Nursing). Surveyor asked DON B when you would expect orders to be transcribed, when the orders are given.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pressure Ulcer Prevention (Tag F0686)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Example 3 R14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include, in part: Paraplegia, Type II Diabetes, Maligna...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Example 3 R14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include, in part: Paraplegia, Type II Diabetes, Malignant Neoplasm of Left Bronchus or Lung (Lung Cancer), and Morbid Obesity. R14's Physician orders indicate the following: June: Start date of 6/22/24. R (right) buttock wound; cleanse with 1/2 S. (Solution) Dakin's, apply wet to dry gauze with 1/2 S. Dakin's solution and cover with bordered foam BID (twice daily) and PRN (as needed) dressing soiled or loose. Every day and evening shift for wound care. Discontinue date of 6/25/24. Start Date of 6/25/24: R (right) buttock wound; cleanse with 1/2 S. (Solution) Dakin's, apply wet to dry gauze with 1/2 S. Dakin's solution and cover with bordered gauze, then foam dressing over top BID (twice daily) and PRN (as needed) dressing soiled or loose. Every day and evening shift for wound care. Discontinue date: 7/1/24. R14's TAR (Treatment Administration Record) indicates treatments were not documented as completed for the following dates: June: 6/23/24 Evening, 6/27/24 Day and Evening, 6/28/24 Evening; for a total of 4 missed treatments in June. On 9/11/24 at 4:21 PM, Surveyor interviewed DON B (Director of Nursing). Surveyor asked DON B what it means if there is a blank in the TAR, DON B said it wasn't done. Surveyor asked DON B would you expect wound care to be completed as ordered, DON B stated yes. Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure that residents with pressure injuries receive necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new injuries from developing for 3 of 5 (R34, R45 and R14) residents reviewed for pressure injuries out of a total sample of 24. R34 did not have his wound treatments completed as ordered. R45 did have her wound treatments completed as ordered. R14 did not have wound treatments completed as ordered. This is evidenced by: The Facility's Policy and Procedure entitled Wound Treatment Management dated 2/14/23, documents in part: .1. Wound treatments will be provided in accordance with physician orders, including the cleansing method, type of dressing, and frequency of dressing change .7. Treatments will be documented on the Treatment Administration Record or in the electronic health record. Example 1 R34 has the following diagnoses: paraplegia complete, chronic pain, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, pressure ulcer of sacral region stage 4, pressure ulcer of left buttock stage 4 and pressure ulcer of right buttock stage 4. R34 was out of the facility on therapeutic leave for the following dates: 6/13/24-6/14/24 6/18/24-6/19/24 6/21/24-6/22/24 6/25/24-6/26/24 6/28/24-6/29/24 7/1/24-7/2/24 7/4/24-7/5/24 7/26/24-7/29/24 8/26/24-8/28/24 9/4/24-9/6/24 9/9/24-9/10/24 R34's Risk vs (versus) Benefit Documentation dated 6/14/24, documents in part: Education: R34 left the facility yesterday morning and did not come back to the facility until after midnight. He did not take his medications with him or have his treatments completed. Noncompliance with medications and treatments can put R34 at risk for infection, medical complications, and even death. Response: If you leave the facility, you should alert nursing and sign out. You should ensure that you take medications with you and have treatment completed prior to discharge. Acknowledgement: Having another individual in your bed reduces the pressure relieving qualities of your specialty mattress and makes repositioning difficult. This could worsen your chronic wounds. R34 was hospitalized for the following dates: 7/12/24-7/13/24 7/14/24- 7/15/24 7/15/24-7/17/24 7/25/24-7/26/24 7/27/24-7/28/24 8/2/24-8/3/24 8/5/24-8/6/24 8/19/24-8/20/24 8/24/24 back same day 9/2/24-9/3/24 R34's Physician orders for wound care was as follows: June: 6/12/24 Ischial tuberosity bilateral (lower buttock): Cleanse wound with Hibiclens, use wet to dry pack with Dakin's moistened gauze, and cover with Mepilex (foam) twice daily. Discontinued 7/15/24. 6/12/24 Sacrum remove dressing and cleanse wound with Hibiclens and cover with Mepilex (foam) twice daily. Discontinued 7/15/24. July: 7/16/24 R/L (right and left) Ischial tuberosity; cleanse with 1/4 S. Dakin's, followed by NS (normal saline), protect peri-wound with skin prep, apply alginate with silver to wound bed and cover with bordered gauze daily. Discontinued 8/1/24. 7/17/24 Sacrum: cleanse with 1/4 Dakin's followed by NS, protect peri-wound with skin prep, cover wound with foam dressing MWF (Monday, Wednesday, Friday). August: 8/1/24 R/L ischial tuberosity: cleanses with 1/4 Dakin's, followed by NS, protect peri-wound with skin prep, apply alginate with silver to wound bed and cover with bordered gauze BID (twice a day). Discontinued 8/13/24. 8/13/24 R/L ischial tuberosity: cleanses with 1/4 Dakin's, followed by NS, protect peri-wound with skin prep, apply alginate with silver to wound bed and cover with bordered gauze BID. R34's TAR (Treatment Administration Record) documents the following dates that treatments weren't completed: June- 6/17/24 no AM Tx's done (total of 3- right ischium, left ischium, sacrum) July- 7/6/24 PM not done (total 2- R/L ischium's), 7/22/24 no AM Tx's done (total of 3), 7/23/24 AM not done (total of 2- R/L ischium's) August- 8/1/24 AM not done (total of 2- R/L ischium's), 8/4/24 PM not done (total of 2- R/L ischium's), 8/7/24 PM not done (total of 2- R/L ischium's), 8/10/24 PM not done (total of 2- R/L ischium's), 8/13/24 AM and PM not done (total of 2- R/L ischium's), 8/14/24 AM and PM not done (total 3- right ischium, left ischium, sacrum), 8/17/24 PM not done (total of 2- R/L ischium's), 8/21/24 AM not done (total of 2- R/L ischium's), 8/14/24, 8/21/24 no AM Tx's done (total of 3- right ischium, left ischium, sacrum) September- All Tx's documented On 9/11/24 at 1:07 PM, Surveyor interviewed LPN O (Licensed Practical Nurse). Surveyor asked LPN O should R34 have his wound treatments done before or after medication administration, LPN O said we complete his wound care as he allows. Surveyor asked LPN O are R34's wound treatments done consistently at the same time of day; LPN O replied no it's as he allows. On 9/11/24 at 2:42 PM, Surveyor interviewed ADON/IP C (Assistant Director of Nursing/Infection Preventionist). Surveyor asked ADON/IP C should R34 have his wound treatments done before or after medication administration, ADON/IP C said sometime on the shift. Surveyor asked ADON/IP C, are R34's wound treatments done consistently at the same time of day, ADON/IP C stated no, they are completed on his schedule. Example 2 R45 has the following diagnoses: hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebrovascular accident affecting left dominant side, diabetes mellitus, peripheral vascular disease, metabolic encephalopathy, morbid obesity, and acquired absence of left leg below knee. R45's Physician orders for wound care was as follows: June: 5/9/24 R (right) heel: Cleanse with NS (normal saline), protect peri-wound with skin prep, apply bacitracin followed by dry dressing and apply Tubigrip from base of toes to below knee every evening shift. Discontinued 7/16/24. 6/29/24 Apply dry dressing to R (right) heel q (every) 3 days and PRN (as needed). Discontinued 7/3/24. July: 7/4/24 Cleanse R heel with NS, pat dry, protect peri-wound with skin prep, and apply foam dressing every other day and PRN. Discontinue 9/4/24. August: No treatment changes. September: 9/4/24 Cleanse R heel wound with NS, pat dry, protect peri-wound with skin prep, apply collagen with silver to wound bed and cover with foam dressing every other day and PRN (as needed.) R45's TAR documents the following dates that treatments weren't completed: June- 6/3/24, 6/8/24, 6/12/24; for a total of 3 days in June. July- 7/7/24; for a total of 1 day in July. August- 8/9/24; for a total of 1 day in August. September- 9/4/24, 9/9/24; for a total of 2 days in September. On 9/11/24 at 1:14 PM, Surveyor interviewed LPN O (Licensed Practical Nurse). Surveyor asked LPN O what it means if there is a blank in the TAR (Treatment Administration Record), LPN O said it wasn't done or was missed. Surveyor asked LPN O should wound care be completed as ordered, LPN O stated yes. On 9/11/24 at 2:48 PM, Surveyor interviewed ADON/IP C (Assistant Director of Nursing/Infection Preventionist). Surveyor asked ADON/IP C if R45's right heel wound was healed on 6/21/24, ADON/IP C explained that it was freshly healed, scant healing. Surveyor asked ADON/IP C if R45's right heel wound re-opened/graft no longer adhered on 7/1/24, ADON/IP C said yes. Surveyor asked ADON/IP C should wound care be completed as ordered, ADON/IP C stated yes. On 9/11/24 at 4:21 PM, Surveyor interviewed DON B (Director of Nursing). Surveyor asked DON B what it means if there is a blank in the TAR, DON B said it wasn't done. Surveyor asked DON B would you expect wound care to be completed as ordered, DON B stated yes.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Example 3 R52 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses including parkinsonism, asthma, diabetes, respiratory fail...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Example 3 R52 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses including parkinsonism, asthma, diabetes, respiratory failure, depression, anxiety disorder, and insomnia. R52 most recent MDS (Minimum Data Set) with ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 8/6/24, indicates R52 has a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 13 indicating R52 is cognitively intact. R52 is own person. On 9/9/24 at 4:25 PM, R52 indicated she did not believe she had an assessment completed for using her electric scooter. Surveyor reviewed R52's progress notes. R52's progress notes indicate resident utilized electric scooter while out in community on 5/5/24 and 5/8/24. On 9/12/24 at 8:26AM, DR X (Director of Rehab) indicated R52 had passed her assessment for safe operation of an electric scooter. DR X indicated therapy is responsible for completing the assessment. DR X provided Surveyor R52's evaluation for safe operation of electrical wheelchairs/scooters assessment. Surveyor asked DR X if the assessment was initiated on 5/10/24, DR X indicated it was. DR X indicated the assessment should be completed before a resident uses an electric device to ensure safety. On 9/12/24 at 1:15PM, Surveyor interviewed DON B (Director of Nursing) regarding R52's scooter assessment. DON B indicated R52 should have had an assessment to determine R52 is safe to operate a scooter before the scooter is used. Surveyor asked for any additional information. No further information was provided. Example 2 On 9/11/24 at 1:40 PM, Surveyor observed R34's electric wheelchair charging in his room. On 9/11/24 at 1:43 PM, Surveyor interviewed CNA P (Certified Nursing Assistant). Surveyor asked CNA P where R34's electric wheelchair is charged, CNA P said I'm not sure, I'll find out and get back to you. On 9/11/24 at 1:47 PM, CNA P returned and told Surveyor R34's electric wheelchair should not be charging in his room. Surveyor asked CNA P where it should be charging, CNA P said I'm not sure. On 9/11/24 at 2:07 PM, Surveyor interviewed ADON/IP C (Assistant Director of Nursing/Infection Preventionist). Surveyor asked ADON/IP C where staff charge R34's electric wheelchair, ADON/IP C said it should not be charged in R34's room. Surveyor asked ADON/IP C where should R34's electric wheelchair be charged, ADON/IP C stated at the end of the hall in the lounge. Surveyor asked ADON/IP C if she was aware that R34's electric wheelchair was charging in his room currently, ADON/IP C stated no, I was not aware that it is charging in his room currently. On 9/11/24 at 2:27 PM, Surveyor interviewed LPN O (Licensed Practical Nurse). Surveyor asked LPN O where staff charge R34's electric wheelchair, LPN O said it should not be charged in his room. Surveyor asked LPN O where should R34's electric wheelchair be charged, LPN O stated at the end of the hall in the lounge or in therapy. On 9/11/24 at 4:10 PM, Surveyor interviewed DON B (Director of Nursing). Surveyor asked DON B where R34's electric wheelchair is charged, DON B stated it should not be charged in his room. Surveyor asked DON B where should R34's electric wheelchair be charged, DON B said at the end of the hall. Surveyor asked DON B if she was aware that R34's electric wheelchair had been charging in his room today, DON B stated someone told me that today. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not ensure each residents environment was free of accidents and hazards for 3 of 24 total sampled Residents (R48, R34 and R52.) R48 indicated she smokes. R48 did not have a smoking assessment or care plan completed for smoking even though nursing staff were aware that she smoked occasionally. R34's electric wheelchair was charging in his room. R52 indicated she would use her electric scooter and go out in the community on her own. Therapy did not complete an assessment for safe operation of electrical wheelchairs/scooters until after R52 went out in community by herself. Evidenced by: Facility policy entitled 'Smoking Policy,' (no date), states in part: when the resident requests to smoke, the interdisciplinary team will assess the resident capabilities and deficits to determine appropriate supervision and assistance. Smoking will only be allowed in designated (outdoor) area(s) in the facility that are not near flammable substances or where oxygen is in use. Residents, resident representatives, and visitors will be informed of the facility smoking policy. Procedure: .Electronic cigarettes .are battery-powered devices that deliver nicotine by producing a heated vapor. Fires and/or explosions caused by e-cigarettes can happen but are rare. Most occur during charging of the battery. Procedure: 1. any resident choosing to smoke will be assessed by a member of the interdisciplinary team utilizing the smoking evaluation: a. will be completed upon admission, quarterly, with a change of condition and as needed. b. individualized approaches and directions for safety and assistance will be documented in the resident plan of care and communicated to direct care staff .2. if a resident chooses to smoke electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes, vapes, vaporizers, vape pens etc.) they must smoke them in designated smoking areas outside. 3. charging of the e-cigarette should only be accomplished using power sources approved by the manufacturer to recharge the lithium-ion battery (i.e., those that came with the device). 4. do not charge the e-cigarette overnight. 5. replace the battery/batteries if wet or damaged . The Facility's Policy and Procedure entitled Power Mobility Device dated 1/1/24 documents the following, in part: .The purpose of this policy is to ensure power mobility devices (Motorized wheelchairs) are charged safely in the facility .Locations for charging the electronic mobility device must: Not obstruct hallways, The charging area must have impermeable flooring, and Be well ventilated .: The facility policy, Power Mobility Device, dated 01/24, states, in part; .Our facility will: evaluate and document the resident's need regarding the use of a power mobility device. The individualized needs will be identified. A care plan with appropriate interventions to meet the resident's needs will be developed. Interventions must be reviewed quarterly or when a significant change in condition occurs Example 1 R48 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis that include critical illness myopathy (weakness or fatigue of muscles), Acute respiratory distress syndrome, Morbid (sever) obesity, asthma, and acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (low oxygen). R48's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 7/4/24 indicates R48's BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) is a 15 out of 15, indicating R48 is cognitively intact. On 9/9/24 at 12:37 PM, Surveyor interviewed R48 regarding smoking during initial pooling. R48 indicated she smokes a couple times a week with her boyfriend. On 9/10/24 Surveyor reviewed the facility Survey binder for the list of smokers. R48 was not listed on the list of smokers provided to Surveyors. On 9/11/24 at 8:39 AM, Surveyor interviewed RN G (Registered Nurse) regarding R48 smoking. RN G indicated she thinks (R48) smokes in the evening with her boyfriend, but RN G has not seen her smoke. Surveyor asked if RN G knew if R48 smoked cigarettes or vaped, RN G indicated she heard it's a vape. Surveyor asked RN G if R48 has an assessment or care plan for smoking, RN G indicated she would expect her to have one. RN G looked in the electronic health record and stated, I did not see an evaluation for her. On 9/11/24 at 8:41 AM, Surveyor interviewed CNA F (Certified Nursing Assistant) regarding R48 smoking. CNA F indicated she has not seen R48 smoke, but heard she does with her boyfriend. CNA F indicated that R48 has a vape in her room and asks us (CNA's) to charge it. On 9/11/24 at 8:46 AM, SW D (Social Worker) was at the nurses station while Surveyor interviewed RN G and CNA F. SW D stated she doesn't have an evaluation because she wasn't a smoker on her referral. Surveyor indicated to SW D that Surveyor was informed by CNA F that R48 has a vape in her room and R48 told Surveyor she smokes. SW D stated someone should have told me. On 9/11/24 at 9:26 AM, SW D indicated to Surveyor that R48 was hiding a vape in her room, and that SW D did a smoking evaluation today and R48 is to be a supervised smoker and SW D updated the smoking list. A copy of R48's smoking evaluation dated 9/11/24 was provided to Surveyor. R48's smoking evaluation indicates R48 vapes 1-2 times per day in the evenings, not able to light own cigarette (vape is hand written) R48 is supervised - Resident needs someone to push her out and bring her back in and to light her cigarette. Of note: R48 does not have a smoking care plan. Nursing staff were aware that R48 smoked outside with her boyfriend. There is no smoking evaluation completed, no smoking care plan was developed and R48 was not indicated as a smoker on the facility's smoking list.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pharmacy Services (Tag F0755)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not provide pharmaceutical services including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administerin...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not provide pharmaceutical services including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biological's to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 1 Supplemental Resident (R32). On 9/10/24 R32 had a lidocaine patch still on her arm that was not removed the night before. Evidenced by: Facility policy entitled, Medication Administration General Guidelines, dated 01/24, states in part: .medications are administered as prescribed in accordance with manufacturers' specifications, good nursing principles and practices and only by persons legally authorized to do so . Procedures: Medication Preparation: .3.Prior to administration, review and confirm medication orders for each individual resident on the medication administration record. Compare the medication and dosage schedule on the Resident's MAR (Medication Administration Record) with the medication label. If the label and MAR are different, and the container is not flagged indicating a change in directions, or if there is any other reason to question the dosage or directions, the prescriber's orders are checked for the correct dosage schedule . Medication administration: 1. Medications are administered in accordance with written orders of the prescriber.Documentation: .2. If a dose of regularly scheduled medication is withheld, refused, or given at other than the scheduled time (for example the resident is not in the nursing care center at scheduled dose time or a starter dose of antibiotics is needed),.an explanatory note is entered on the reverse side of the record provided for PRN documentation . Facility policy entitled 'Medication Error reporting and counseling procedure,' dated 12/12/23, states in part: Policy: This policy outlines the steps to be followed when a medication error occurs at the nursing facility. It aims to ensure the safe and effective management of medication errors and provide appropriate employee follow-ups, including use of a medication error counseling form, for those involved.Compliance guidelines: Procedure: 1. Reporting the medication error: a. the person who identifies a medication error should immediately report it to the charge nurse of the designated nursing supervisor and ultimately the Director of Nursing. when a medication error occurs, the licensed nurse/employee needs to be able to report the error, and without fear of penalty, to Nursing management.2. Assessing and Documenting the Medication error: a. A prompt assessment of the resident(s) involved to be completed to determine harm or potential risk to the resident. Document all relevant details of the medication error in the resident's record and incident report .3. Notify the Provider(s): a. the facility will inform the primary or prescribing physician(s) of the medication error in a timely manner and document notification in the medical record . R32's September 2024 MAR (medication administration record) indicates: Lidocaine external patch 5% apply to affected pain areas topically one time a day for pain. start date 8/10/24 discontinue date 9/10/24. This is signed out on 9/10 with a 4 which means other/see nurses notes. Lidocaine external patch 4% apply to Left shoulder topically one time a day for pain and remove per schedule start date 9/11/24. On 9/10/24 at 7:33 AM during medication administration for R32, LPN I had moved R32s left arm sleeve up to place R32's patch then indicated she realized while in R32's room that the Lidocaine patch is a 4% not a 5%. Surveyor observed R32 to have a lidocaine patch still on her left arm with no date or initials. LPN I indicated there was not a date on it, we apply a new one every morning it's scheduled to be removed at night. LPN I did remove lidocaine patch that was still on R32 at this time. On 9/10/24 at 10:41 AM, R32's progress note states in part: . lidocaine external patch 5% . medication out of stock writer has called (pharmacy name) to reorder STAT (Right away). On 9/10/24 at 1:58 PM, R32's Progress note states in part: .Writer informed (Nurse Practitioner name) that lidocaine patch 5% needs to be reordered. 5% patch is not available in facility at this time per (Nurse Practitioner) switch order to lidocaine patch 4% daily. (Of note: there is no documentation indicating that the NP was updated on R32 having her lidocaine patch left on until morning.) On 9/10/24 at 5:30 PM Surveyor interviewed DON B (Director of Nursing) regarding medication observation. DON B indicated observation with R32 was a medication error. DON B indicated that the lidocaine patch should have been removed the night prior and the nurse should have called the doctor regarding the lidocaine patch error to know if to hold or continue with administration.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Unnecessary Medications (Tag F0759)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that it was free of medication error rates of 5% or greater. There were 3 errors out of 28 opportunities that affected 2...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that it was free of medication error rates of 5% or greater. There were 3 errors out of 28 opportunities that affected 2 out of 4 supplemental residents (R32 & R31) included in the medication pass task, which resulted in an error rate of 10.71%. RN H (Registered Nurse) did not give R31 the correct dosing of his Sevelamer (phosphate binder to prevent low levels of calcium) LPN I (Licensed Practical Nurse) omitted R32's lidocaine patch and dispensed R463s medication into R32's medication cup. Evidenced by: Facility policy entitled, Medication Administration General Guidelines, dated 01/24, states in part: .medications are administered as prescribed in accordance with manufacturers' specifications, good nursing principles and practices and only by persons legally authorized to do so . Procedures: Medication Preparation: .3. Prior to administration, review and confirm medication orders for each individual resident on the medication administration record. Compare the medication and dosage schedule on the Resident's MAR (Medication Administration Record) with the medication label. If the label and MAR are different, and the container is not flagged indicating a change in directions, or if there is any other reason to question the dosage or directions, the prescriber's orders are checked for the correct dosage schedule . Medication administration: 1. Medications are administered in accordance with written orders of the prescriber . 8. Check expiration date on package/container. No expired medications will be administered to a resident.b. The nurse shall place a 'date opened' sticker on the medication if one is not provided by the dispensing pharmacy and enter the date opened. c. Certain products or package types such as multi-dose vials and ophthalmic drops have specified shortened end-of-use dating once opened, to ensure medication purity and potency .position statements from American Society of Ophthalmic Registered Nurses and American Society of Cataract & Refractive Surgery (ASCRS) state that the multi-use eye drops and ointments should be disposed of 28 days after initial use . 9. Verify medication is correct three (3) times before administering the medication. a. when pulling medication package from med cart. b. when dose is prepared. c. before dose is administered.16. Medications supplied for one resident are never administered to another resident.Documentation: .2. If a dose of regularly scheduled medication is withheld, refused, or given at other than the scheduled time (for example the resident is not in the nursing care center at scheduled dose time, or a starter dose of antibiotics is needed) an explanatory note is entered on the reverse side of the record provided for PRN documentation . Example 1 R31's September 2024 MAR (Medication Administration record) indicates Sevelamer Carbonate oral tablet 800 mg give 2 tablets by mouth three times a day. On 9/9/24 at 3:30 PM, Surveyor observed RN H prepare R31's medications. RN H prepared the following medications: 1. Gabapentin 300 mg (milligrams) 1 cap 2. Sevelamer carbonate 800 mg 1 tablet. R31's medication card indicated give 2 tabs by mouth three times a day for ESRD (end stage renal disease) RN H only dispensed 1 tab. 3. Deep Sea nasal saline spray 1 spray each nostril. On 9/9/24 at 3:33 PM, Surveyor asked RN H how many medications she had for R31, RN H replied 2 pills plus a nasal spray. On 9/9/24 at 3:36 PM Surveyor stopped RN H while heading down hall to R31's room. Surveyor asked RN H to re-look at R31's medication card. RN H indicated she looked and I saw 800, I didn't see 2 tabs. Surveyor asked RN H should R31 have 2 tabs of Sevelamer, RN H replied yes. RN H pulled out a 2nd card and popped out a 2nd pill and then delivered R31's medications to him. Example 2 R32's Physician Orders indicate: Lidocaine external patch 5% (lidocaine) apply to affected pain areas topically one time a day for pain. Apixaban oral tablet 2.5 mg (milligrams) give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day. (also known as Eliquis) On 9/10/24 at 7:13 AM Surveyor observed LPN I prepare R32's medications and LPN I prepared the following: 1. Acetaminophen 325 mg (milligrams) 2 tabs (stock) 2. Amlodipine besylate 5 mg tab 3. Combivent Respimate 20-100 mg 1 puff 4. R463's Eliquis 2.5 mg (milligram) tablet was popped out of R463's medication card. LPN I placed the card back into the cart, Surveyor asked LPN I to re-look at the Eliquis card and read the name on the card. LPN I indicated that it was R463's medication, she removed that medication from the med cup, then retrieved R32's Eliquis 2.5 mg card and dispensed the medication from R32's medication card. Surveyor asked if R463 was the correct resident LPN I indicated no. 5. Metoprolol ER 25 mg tablet 6. Potassium chloride ER 10meq (milliequivalent) tab 7. Lidocaine pain-relief gel patch 4% lidocaine. 8. Losartan 100 mg tablet. LPN I indicated I need to get from stock at 7:39 AM Losartan 25 mg tab x 4 tabs pulled from contingency to make 100 mg. 9. Furosemide 20 mg 1 tab from contingency pulled on 9/10/24 at 7:39 AM 10. Fluticasone propionate and Salmeterol 250 mcg (micrograms)/50 mcg (micrograms) - 1 puff daily. On 9/10/24 at 7:33 AM LPN I realized while in R32's room prior to putting on R32's Lidocaine patch that the patch is 4% not 5% and LPN I did not apply the patch. During this time Surveyor observed R32 to have a Lidocaine patch still on her left arm with no date or initials. LPN I indicated not a date on it we apply a new one every morning the patch should be removed at night. LPN I left the room to get a different patch. LPN I was unable to find a 5% patch and stated 5% must be out, I will need to order that STAT (as soon as possible) from the pharmacy. On 9/10/24 at 1:58 PM, R32's Progress note states in part: .Writer informed (Nurse Practitioner (NP) name) that lidocaine patch 5% needs to be reordered. 5% patch is not available in facility at this time. per (Nurse Practitioner) switch order to lidocaine patch 4% daily. (Of note: there is no documentation indicating that the NP was updated on R32 having her lidocaine patch left on her arm or that the lidocaine patch was not applied during AM medication pass.) On 9/10/24 at 5:30 PM, Surveyor interviewed DON B regarding medication observation. DON B indicated observation with R31 was a medication error and observation with R32 was a medication error. DON B indicated wrong patients medication card is a medication error, DON B indicated that the Lidocaine patch should have been removed the night prior and the nurse should have called the doctor regarding the lidocaine patch error to know if to hold or continue with administration.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not ensure drugs and biological's are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional standards for 1 of 2 Medication car...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not ensure drugs and biological's are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional standards for 1 of 2 Medication carts and 1 of 1 medication rooms reviewed for medication storage. Medication room had 5 bottles of expired liquid Tylenol on the shelf. Medication room fridge had an undated open insulin vial for R57. Needlepoint medication cart had three bottles of artificial tears that did not have the residents full name or date opened on them. Evidenced by: Facility policy entitled, Medication Administration General Guidelines, dated 01/24, states in part: . Medication administration: 1. Medications are administered in accordance with written orders of the prescriber . 8. Check expiration date on package/container. No expired medications will be administered to a resident.b. The nurse shall place a 'date opened' sticker on the medication if one is not provided by the dispensing pharmacy and enter the date opened. c. Certain products or package types such as multi-dose vials and ophthalmic drops have specified shortened end-of-use dating once opened, to ensure medication purity and potency .position statements from American Society of Ophthalmic Registered Nurses and American Society of Cataract & Refractive Surgery (ASCRS) state that the multi-use eye drops and ointments should be disposed of 28 days after initial use . 9. Verify medication is correct three (3) times before administering the medication. a. when pulling medication package from med cart. b. when dose is prepared. c. before dose is administered.16. Medications supplied for one resident are never administered to another resident.Documentation: .2. If a dose of regularly scheduled medication is withheld, refused, or given at other than the scheduled time (for example the resident is not in the nursing care center at scheduled dose time, or a starter dose of antibiotics is needed) an explanatory note is entered on the reverse side of the record provided for PRN documentation . On 9/9/24 at 3:06 PM, Surveyor conducted medication storage observation of 2 medication carts and 1 medication room. Surveyor observed the Needle point/Birchwood Hall cart with RN H (Registered Nurse). Surveyor found three vials of artificial tears in the cart, that were not properly labeled or dated. One bottle had no first or last name on it with an open date of 6/20/24. The other two bottles had only first names of residents on it and no open date. RN H indicated that one of the eye drops belonged to R25 and the other belonged to R33. RN H indicated she is not able to say who the third bottle of artificial tears belonged to. Surveyor asked based on the labels having only the first names, would staff be certain they belong to R25 or R33? RN H indicated No, especially if you had two residents with the same first names. RN H indicated the one bottle has an open date of 6/20/24 and the others do not have an open date. RN H indicated there should be full resident names on the eye drops along with an open date to know if they're still good. Surveyor observed the medication room with RN H after reviewing the cart. Surveyor and RN H observed 5 bottles of liquid Tylenol on the shelf with an expiration date of 7/2024. RN H indicated the Tylenol should not be in the medication room due to being expired. Surveyor and RN H observed an open vial of Lantus for R57 in the medication room refrigerator. RN H was unable to say when it was opened or how long it was opened for. On 9/9/24 at 3:24 PM Surveyor interviewed LPN E (Licensed Practical Nurse) regarding medication storage. LPN E indicated R57's Lantus vial is opened and was dispensed on 7/28/24, and there is no open date on it, it should be dated. LPN E indicated the insulin is only good for 28 days once it's opened. LPN E indicated eye drops are only good for 30 days after they have been opened unless specified. On 9/10/24 at 5:30 PM, Surveyor interviewed DON B (Director of Nursing) regarding medication storage/expiration dates. Surveyor asked DON B if Tylenol with an expiration date of 7/2024 should be in the med room, DON B indicated it was expired and should not be in there. Surveyor asked about dating insulin and eye drops, DON B indicated they should have an open date. DON B indicated that everyone should be checking expiration and labeling dates.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0804 (Tag F0804)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that all residents receive food at a palatable t...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that all residents receive food at a palatable temperature for 1 of 1 sampled (R467) and 1 of 1 supplemental residents (R41) and 1 of 1 test trays. Residents R467 and R41 voiced concerns with receiving hot foods cold. Test tray was observed to have hot foods served cold and food not palatable. Evidenced by: The facility policy, Record of Food Temperatures, dated 3/24, states, in part; .It is the policy of this facility to record food temperatures daily to ensure food is at the proper serving temperatures before trays are assembled .11. No food will be served that does not meet the food code standard temperatures . Example 1 R467 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include, in part, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Essential Hypertension, atherosclerotic heart disease. On 9/9/24 at 11:16 AM Surveyor interviewed R467 and asked about the food. R467 stated the food is cold. Example 2 R41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R41's most recent MDS (Minimum Data Set) with a target date of 6/12/24, indicates R41 has a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 12, indicating R41 has a mild cognitive impairment. On 9/9/24 at 11:26AM Surveyors met with residents for the resident council task. R41 was present and indicated that sometimes hot food is provided luke warm and that she has sent food back to the kitchen that was cold. Example 3 On 9/10/24 at 12:30PM, Surveyor received test tray. Meat and gravy temped at 111F, noodles 109F, and mixed vegetable 115F. Surveyor observed the noodles to be not palatable and mushy in texture. On 9/12/24 at 9:49AM, NSD W (Nutrition Services Director) indicated he would expect hot foods to be served hot and foods served palatable. NSD W indicated the facility is working on getting new equipment and hot plates. NSD W indicated meal temperatures have been an ongoing issue because staff will leave the warming box open while they are placing trays into it and the heat goes out. The facility failed to ensure all residents receive food at a palatable temperature.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not ensure food was stored or labeled in accordance with professional standards for 1 of 2 medication room refrigerators. Three car...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not ensure food was stored or labeled in accordance with professional standards for 1 of 2 medication room refrigerators. Three cartons of thickened liquids and two half gallons of chocolate milk were opened and expired in the medication room refrigerator. Evidenced by: Facility policy entitled 'Food Safety Requirements,' states in part: .Policy explanation and compliance guidelines: .3. Facility staff shall inspect all food, food products, and beverages for safe transport and quality upon delivery/receipt and ensure timely and proper storage.c. Refrigerated storage - foods that require refrigeration shall be refrigerated immediately upon receipt or placed in freezer, whichever is applicable. Practices to maintain safe refrigerated storage include: .iv. Labeling, dating, and monitoring refrigerated food, including but not limited to leftovers, so it is used by its use-by date, or frozen . On 9/9/24 at 3:20 PM, Surveyor observed the medication room refrigerator and found the following: One Ready care thickened apple juice with an open date of 7/22/24, Directions on the carton indicate refrigerate prior to serving. shake well before using. Twist the cap to open then pour and serve. After opening may be kept up to 7 days under refrigeration. Two Trumoo 1/2 (half) gallons of chocolate milk with a sell by date of 8/26/24. One had an open date of 8/11/24, the other did not have an open date, both milks jugs were partially gone. One Hormel Med Pass 2.0 vanilla shake indicated as being opened 8/26/24, the carton indicated for storage & Handling: after open, consume product within 4 days if properly refrigerated. One Hormel Thick & Easy nectar consistency dairy product with an opened date of 7/11/24, the carton indicated Storage & Handling: refrigerate after opening, discard if not used within 4 days of opening. On 9/9/24 at 3:24 PM, LPN E (Licensed Practical Nurse) indicated the 2nd refrigerator in the medication room is the resident refrigerator. LPN E indicate supplements and food items should be discarded if the items are expired. LPN E was unable to say who the chocolate milk belonged to. On 9/10/24 at 9:30 AM, NHA A (Nursing Home Administrator) indicated to Surveyor that only R3 and R26 receive nectar thick liquids. On 9/10/24 at 5:30 PM, Surveyor interviewed DON B (Director of Nursing) regarding expired items in the medication room fridge. DON B indicated if the items in the medication refrigerator should have open dates and if expired should be discarded. DON B indicated that night shift cleans out the medication refrigerator and that everyone should be checking for expiration and open dates.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0584)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Example 3 R15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include Major Depressive Disorder, unspecified dementia...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Example 3 R15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include Major Depressive Disorder, unspecified dementia, muscle wasting and atrophy, and anxiety disorder unspecified. R15's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented that R15 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 4 out of 15, which indicates he has severe cognitive impairment. On 9/10/24 at 10:28 AM, Surveyor observed the condition of R15's room and noted that the trim was pulling away from the wall by the sink, a large area of peeling paint and drywall near the foot of the bed, multiple brown scuff marks on the wall next to the bed, and a large blackish stain on the overhead ceiling tile. On 9/10/24 at 11:40 AM, Surveyor interviewed R15's Power of Attorney (POA) and RR U (Resident Representative). RR U stated that overall, the facility could do a better job with the cleaning and maintenance of the building. RR U commented that the trim in R15's room was coming loose, and the drywall was disintegrating. RR U stated that the room had been in this state of disrepair for months. RR U said that she had come in to visit R15 and noticed drops of urine on the floor that she had cleaned up herself. On 9/11/24 at 7:43 AM, Surveyor interviewed Maintenance Q, who stated that he was aware of the condition of R15's room, and that the repairs were on his priority list. Maintenance Q stated that the black stain on the ceiling tile was not mold, but was condensation sweat from the black pipe that was above the ceiling, and that he had ordered new ceiling tiles. Surveyor asked Maintenance Q if R15's room would be considered a homelike environment, and Maintenance Q said no, it was not a homelike environment. On 9/12/24 at 10:16 AM, Surveyor interviewed NHA A (Nursing Home Administrator), who stated that next year the facility would be getting new flooring and when they do that, they will also fix the peeling wallpaper and paint. Surveyor asked NHA A if the scuff marks, crumbling wall, and peeling paint in R15's room would be considered a homelike environment, and NHA A stated no, that is not a homelike environment. Example 2 R52 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses including parkinsonism, asthma, diabetes, respiratory failure, depression, anxiety disorder, and insomnia. R52 most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 8/6/24, indicates R52 has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 indicating R52 is cognitively intact. R52 is own person. On 9/9/24 at 4:25 PM, R52 indicated R52 is unable to use her closet. R52 indicated her dresser is broken so she has to keep clothes and personal items in boxes. Surveyor observed boxes to be lined up against wall in R52's room. R52 indicated she has reported these concerns to staff. On 9/12/24 at 9:34 AM, MD Q (Maintenance Director) indicated staff are able to report maintenance issues through their computer system. MD Q indicated he was not aware of R52's concern with her dresser and closet. MD Q indicated he would expect staff to report maintenance issues through reporting system so he can track and prioritize projects. MD Q indicated he would go talk to R52 now and fix her dresser. On 9/12/24 at 12:14 PM, SW D (Social Worker) indicated she would follow up with R52 regarding her closet and dresser and ensure someone assists her with unpacking boxes. SW D indicated she would expect residents to have a dresser and an area to have personal items. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure each resident had the right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 3 of 3 sampled Residents (R35, R52, & R15) and 1 of 1 supplemental (R49). R35 and R49's floor in their room had not been cleaned and had visible dirt on the floor. R15's room was not homelike with visible repairs needed. R52 voiced concern that R52 is unable to use closet in bedroom because of roommate thinking R52 is stealing clothes. R52 voiced concern that her dresser is broken as well. R52 indicated she has to keep all of her clothes and items in boxes in R52's room. Surveyor observed R52 to have boxes stacked up in her room. This is evidenced by: Facility Policy entitled 'Routine Cleaning and Disinfection,' dated 8/2022, states in part: Policy: It is the policy of this facility to ensure the provision of routine cleaning and disinfection in order to provide a safe, sanitary environment and to prevent the development and transmission of infections to the extent possible. Definitions: Cleaning refers to the removal of visible soil from objects and surfaces and is normally accomplished manually or mechanically using water and detergents or enzymatic products.Policy explanation and compliance Guidelines: 1. Routine cleaning and disinfection of frequently touched or visibly soiled surfaces will be performed in common areas, resident rooms and at the time of discharge . Example 1 Facility cleaning schedule sheets dated 9/9/24 indicates Needlepoint, Birchway, and Chapelway Halls were not cleaned by housekeeping. On 9/10/24 at 8:04 AM, Surveyor was going down Needlepoint Hallway observing the environment and rooms. Two Surveyors observed R35 and R49's rooms to have an unclean floor, more than half of the room appeared unclean with visible dirt on the floor. Surveyor took a wet paper towel and wiped an area on the floor that appeared to be unclean and was able visible remove dirt off the floor in both R35 and R49's room. On 9/10/24 at 8:06 AM, Surveyor interviewed Housekeeper J (HSK) regarding the floors. HSK J indicated he's only at the facility on Tuesdays, Wednesdays, and Fridays to clean the floors. Surveyor asked HSK J who would clean the floors when he's not there, HSK J replied to no one deep cleans the floors when he's not there, but Housekeepers are to mop and sweep each room every day. HSK J indicated he cleans R49's floors really good on Fridays. HSK J indicated that R35 and R49's floors were not cleaned. On 9/10/24 at 9:34 AM, Surveyor interviewed R35 regarding his floor. R35 indicated his floor has been unclean for a little while and was unable to say how long the floor was dirty. On 9/10/24 at 12:22 PM, Surveyor interviewed HSK K regarding cleaning. HSK K indicated she cleans the sink, the toilet, and the bathroom, then removes the trash before she sweeps and mops on her assigned side. HSK K who was currently in R49's room indicated this unit was not her assigned unit or side. HSK K indicated she was just called down to clean the floor for the 3rd time as R49 has a habit of peeing on the floor. HSK K indicated the other housekeepers work every other day and the person normally down here on the other days up and quit on Friday. Surveyor asked HSK K who the housekeeping manager is and HSK K indicated it is NHA A (Nursing Home Administrator) currently. On 9/10/24 at 12:37 PM, Surveyor interviewed NHA A regarding observations on Needlepoint Hall. NHA A indicated that the usual housekeeper quit on Friday. NHA A indicated that no one cleaned down Needlepoint yesterday (9/9/24) due to a miscommunication with staff. NHA A indicated that the CNA's did take trash out of the rooms, but no one swept or mopped the floors yesterday.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Example 3 R15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include Major Depressive Disorder, unspecified dementia...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Example 3 R15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include Major Depressive Disorder, unspecified dementia, muscle wasting and atrophy, and anxiety disorder unspecified. R15's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented that R15 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 4 out of 15, which indicates he has severe cognitive impairment. R15's Functional Ability, Section GG of the MDS states in Section 6 sub-part B: Oral hygiene: Partial to moderate assist . R15's Care Plan states in part: Focus dated 11/9/22: Self-care deficit related to activity intolerance, cognitive deficits, decreased mobility, disease process, fatigue, generalized weakness. Intervention dated 11/9/22: Oral care requires staff assist with oral cares .Focus dated 5/8/23: ADL (Activities of Daily Living) Function requires staff intervention to complete ADLs. Intervention dated 5/8/23: Dependent with oral care . R15's record did not have evidence to show R15 receives oral care daily. Surveyor reviewed POC (Point of Care) history, which indicated R15 as Independent with oral care three times, Set up assistance three times, and N/A (not applicable) 28 times. On 9/10/24 at 11:40 AM, Surveyor interviewed R15's Power of Attorney (POA) and RR U (Resident Representative), who voiced concerns that the facility could do a better job assisting R15 with oral cares. RR U stated that R15 is completely dependent on staff assistance for brushing his teeth, and that he recently had to have several teeth extracted. On 9/11/24 at 8:35 AM, Surveyor interviewed CNA R (Certified Nursing Assistance), who stated that R15 was fully dependent on staff for assistance with brushing his teeth. CNA R stated that R15 gets his teeth brushed every day. Surveyor asked CNA R where oral hygiene was documented. CNA R indicated that they chart in Point Click Care (PCC) in the POC (point of care) charting. CNA R did not know why the POC charting would indicate that R15 was independent, or why N/A had been marked. On 9/11/24 at 8:45 AM, Surveyor interviewed CNA F who stated that she attempted to assist R15 with brushing his teeth, but that sometimes he refuses. CNA F indicated that charting is completed in the POC screen of PCC, and that sometimes staff members chart N/A when a resident refuses assistance. On 9/11/24 at 2:50 PM, Surveyor interviewed DON B (Director of Nursing) regarding oral hygiene and documentation. DON B indicated that staff should not be documenting N/A, but should be documenting Resident Refused, which would be more accurate. Example 4 On 9/9/24 at 11:16 AM, Surveyor observed R16 in his room. His fingernails were visibly long and yellowing. There was visible dirt under many of his fingernails. When asked if he likes his fingernails long or if he would like them to cut, R16 stated that he wanted them cut but did not have a pair of fingernail clippers and staff are usually busy. R16's hands were visibly shaking when he held his hands out. When asked if he could trim his own fingernails, R16 said, I don't know. On 9/11/24 at 1:18 PM, Surveyor interviewed CNA F (Certified Nursing Assistant) who stated that she noticed R16's nails were long a few days ago and that they should be cut but because staff typically get behind doing certain cares and tasks, fingernails often get forgotten. On 9/11/24 at 1:21 PM, RN G (Registered Nurse) stated that she was unsure if R16 could trim his own nails, but that she would get it done. RN G stated that they were long and needed to be cut. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not ensure that a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs) receives the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, personal and oral hygiene for 4 of 24 total sampled Residents (R48, R38, R15 & R16). R48 did not receive her showers twice a week every week. R38 did not receive the appropriate oral hygiene care recommended by the dentist. R15 did not receive oral hygiene daily R16's nails were visibly long and staff did not assist R16 in trimming them. Evidenced by: Facility policy entitled 'Oral care,' dated 8/22, states in part: Policy: It is the practice of this facility to provide oral care to residents in order to prevent and control plaque- associated oral diseases. Equipment and supplies. soft- bristle tooth brush, toothpaste; tongue depressor; penlight; mouthwash (optional); dental floss; emesis basin; glass of cool water; face towel; gloves. Policy explanation and compliance guidelines: .4. Apply toothpaste to brush. Holding brush over emesis basin, poor small amount of water over toothpaste. 5. Resident may assist with brushing if able. 6. Hold toothbrush at 45-degree angle to gum line. be sure that bristles rest against and penetrate under gum line. Brush inner and outer surfaces of upper and lower teeth by brushing from gum to crown of each tooth.13. Allow resident to floss and assist as needed. Floss between all teeth. Hold floss against tooth while moving it up and down sides of teeth and under gum line. Avoid flossing if Resident has a tendency to bleed . Facility policy entitled 'Activities of Daily Living (ADLs),' dated 10/24/22, states in part: Policy: The facility will, based on the resident's comprehensive assessment and consistent with the resident's needs and choices, ensure a resident's abilities in ADLs do not deteriorate unless deterioration is unavoidable. Care and services will be provided for the following activities of daily living: 1. bathing, dressing, grooming and oral care; 2. transfer and ambulation; 3. toileting; 4. eating to include meals and snacks; and 5. using speech, language, or other functional communication system. Policy explanation and compliance guidelines: .3. a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living will receive the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene.5. The facility will maintain individual objectives of the care plan and periodic review and evaluation. Example 1 R38 was readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis that include parkinsonism and unspecified dementia. R38's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicates R38 has a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 6 out of 15 indicating that R38 is severely cognitively impaired. Section B indicates R38 has clear speech is understood by others and usually understands others. Section GG indicates R38 requires set up assist with oral hygiene. Section L indicates no oral/dental concerns marked. R38's Care plan indicates assist resident with brushing teeth/dentures, oral care (4/19/23). R38's CNA care guide provided to Surveyor on 9/11/24 indicates set up with oral care. R38's Oral hygiene documentation for the last 30 days shows R38 only received oral hygiene care once a day instead of twice per day on the following dates: 8/16/24, 8/20/24. 8/21/24, 8/25/24, 8/29/24 ,9/1/24, 9/3/24 and 9/4/24. R38's Health Drive Dental visit signed on 8/26/24, states in part: Exam date 8/24/2024 . Teeth .soft plaque/food debris buildup: heavy.Action required by nursing home staff. Continue daily oral care: brush along gumline in a circular motion; assist patient with brushing and flossing twice daily; morning and evening; patient cannot brush for themselves, please brush and floss patient's teeth twice daily. On 9/9/24 at 2:43 PM, Surveyor interviewed R38 regarding her cares. R38 stated they hurt while showing Surveyor her mouth and teeth. Surveyor asked R38 and her husband if R38 has seen a dentist? R38 replied I would like to go. Surveyor observed R38's teeth to have a gray discoloration, and slightly pink/red along gum line near her teeth. On 9/10/24 at 5:54 PM, Surveyor interviewed DON B (Director of Nursing) regarding R38's oral cares. DON B indicated that based on the health drive information she should have flossing on her care plan. Surveyor asked DON B to look at R38's care plan to see if assisting with brushing and flossing twice daily was on there, DON B indicated it's not on there and should be. On 9/11/24 at 9:03 AM, Surveyor interviewed CNA L (Certified Nursing Assistant) regarding R38's oral care. CNA L indicated that she sets her up by putting tooth paste on her tooth brush, and she (R38) brushes her teeth. Surveyor asked CNA L if she offers to floss R38's teeth or if R38 flosses her own teeth, CNA L indicated they don't have any floss sticks or floss, she has never seen floss in a nursing home. R38's dental care is not being provided per recommendations of the dentist. Example 2 R48 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis that include critical illness myopathy (weakness or fatigue of muscles), Acute respiratory distress syndrome, Morbid (sever) obesity, asthma, and acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (low oxygen). R48's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicates R48's Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) is a 15 out of 15, indicating R48 is cognitively intact. R48's Care plan states in part: Bathing/showering: The resident requires by staff [sic] with bathing/showering (12/28/23). R48's CNA care guide indicates Showers are on Thursday AM shift and Tuesday PM shift. On 9/9/24 at 12:08 PM Surveyor interviewed R48 regarding choices. R48 indicated she doesn't really get a choice regarding her showers. R48 indicated she receives a shower when staff can do it. R48 indicated she's supposed to get a shower two times a week Tuesday and Thursday but would like them every other day. R48 states I feel gross going from Thursday to Tuesday without a shower. R48's Shower documentation shows she did not get her scheduled showers on Tuesdays and Thursdays on the following dates: 7/2/24, 7/16/24, 7/18/24, 7/23/24, 7/25/24, 8/6/24, 8/13/24, or 9/5/24. On 9/10/24 at 5:30 PM, Surveyor interviewed DON B (Director of Nursing) regarding showers for R48 and oral hygiene for R38. DON B indicated she would expect R48 to receive her showers on Tuesdays and Thursdays as scheduled and extra if needed. DON B indicated that she would expect R38's dental recommendation to be added to the care plan and staff to follow the recommendations.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0725 (Tag F0725)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Example 5 R15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Major Depressive Diso...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Example 5 R15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Major Depressive Disorder, unspecified dementia, muscle wasting and atrophy, hypertension, and anxiety disorder unspecified. R15's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented that R15 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 4 out of 15, which indicates he has severe cognitive impairment. R15's Functional Ability, Section GG of the MDS states that R15 is dependent or substantial/maximum assistance of staff for all Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) including hygiene, dressing, and mobility. On 9/10/24 at 11:40 AM, Surveyor interviewed R15's Power of Attorney (POA) and RR U (Resident Representative) who voiced concerns that there does not seem to be sufficient staff at times, especially on the weekends. RR U stated that R15 does not always get his teeth brushed every day, and that she has had to clean urine stains off R15's floor herself. Example 6 R25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, heart failure, dementia, hypertension, major depressive disorder, and generalized weakness. R25's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] documented that R25 had a BIMS score of 6 out of 15, which indicates he has severe cognitive impairment. R25's Functional Ability, Section GG of the MDS states that R25 is dependent or substantial/maximum assistance of staff for all ADLs including hygiene, dressing, and mobility. On 9/09/24 at 2:22 PM, Surveyor interviewed R25 who stated that he has had to wait 30 minutes or more at times for staff assistance. R25 indicated that it makes him upset to have to wait that long, especially if he is in pain or needs to use the bathroom. R25 stated that he can wait a while if he has to, but that he wants to know that there is someone there to help him if there is something wrong. Example 7 R51 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), hypertension, Major Depressive Disorder, weakness, and urinary tract infections. R51's Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 7/18/24 documented that R51 had a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score of 14 out of 15, which indicates she is cognitively intact. R51's Functional Ability, Section GG of the MDS states that R51 requires substantial/maximum assistance of staff for all ADLs (Activities of Daily Living), including toileting and dressing, and partial/moderate assistance with mobility. On 9/10/24 at 8:09 AM, Surveyor interviewed R51, who voiced concern that the facility needed more people to help on the weekends, especially Sundays. R51 stated that one Sunday a few weeks ago, she had to wait over an hour to go to the bathroom. R51 indicated that she has a history of urinary tract infections, and that she can't always wait to go to the bathroom. The facilities' Facility Assessment dated 8/1/24 states in part: . Information about our staffing patterns: Average Nurse Aide to Resident Ratio (Direct Care Staff): 1 - 10 . On 9/10/24 at 3:33 PM, Surveyor interviewed Agency CNA V (Certified Nursing Assistant) who stated she was responsible for the care of 13 residents today. On 9/11/24 at 8:38 AM, Surveyor interviewed CNA R who stated that they could use more staff. CNA R stated that she was responsible for 12-13 residents each shift. On 9/11/24 at 8:46 AM, Surveyor interviewed CNA F who stated there is not enough staff to care for the residents at times due to high resident care needs. CNA F stated that it can be difficult to get things done like showering and teeth brushing, but that she always tries to get everything done on her shift. CNA F stated that both her and the other CNAs working on that hall had 12 residents to care for today. On 9/11/24 at 1:19 PM, Surveyor interviewed CNA S, who indicated that there is not enough staff to safely care for the residents. CNA S stated that some residents have very high needs which makes it difficult to get everything done. CNA S stated that showers and teeth brushing are the first things that get left undone, and that Range of Motion (ROM) exercises are not being completed on a regular basis. CNA S stated these things should be done, as they improve the resident's quality of life. CNA S stated that he had voiced his concerns to DON B (Director of Nursing). CNA S stated that he is always responsible for no less than 12 residents on his shift. On 9/11/24 at 2:04 PM, Surveyor interviewed Scheduler E, who stated that she always staffs a 1:10 ratio (one CNA to care for 10 residents). Scheduler E indicated that an acceptable wait time for a call light to be answered would be five minutes. On 9/12/24 at 1:12 PM, Surveyor interviewed DON B (Director of Nursing), who stated that an acceptable wait time for a call light to be answered would be 10-15 minutes. DON B indicated that they do not have any documentation of call light audits, but that management is always on the floor assisting the staff. DON B stated that they are using the facility assessment as a tool to determine appropriate staffing levels. Example 4 R27 admitted to facility on 6/14/24 with diagnoses that include, in part, Anoxic Brain Damage (occurs when the brain's oxygen supply is completely cut off resulting in death of brain cells) and personal history of traumatic brain injury. On 9/10/24 at 9:53 AM, Surveyor interviewed R27's guardian, Guardian T and asked about timeliness of staff answering call lights. Guardian T stated staff will come in to the room, turn the call light off to go get help and never come back, Guardian T stated she will turn the call light back on 40 min later and R27 still has to wait. This is frustrating. Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure that sufficient nursing staff was provided to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident for 6 of 24 sampled residents (R53, R25, R23, R35, R27 and R15) and 1 of 1 (R51) Supplemental residents reviewed for staffing. Residents voiced concern regarding long call light wait times due to not having enough staff. Staff voiced concern of not being able to get tasks done due to not having enough staff. Evidence by The facility policy, Call Lights: Accessibility and Timely Response, dated 8/28/24, states, in part; .Call lights will directly relay to a staff member, hallway or centralized location to ensure appropriate response . Example 1 R53 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses including scoliosis, depression, insomnia, and dysphagia. R53's most recent MDS (Minimum Data Set) with ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 7/17/24, indicates R53 has a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15 indicating R53 is cognitively intact. R53 is his own person. On 9/9/24 at 2:31PM, R53 indicated there are times that he has had to wait over an hour for the call light to be answered. R53 indicated this happens around once a week. R53 indicated when this happens, he gets frustrated. R53 indicated he knows staff get very busy and R53's only option is to wait for assistance. On 9/12/24 at 8:56AM, CNA Y (Certified Nursing Assistant) indicated there is not enough staff. CNA Y indicated there are things that do not get done due to not having enough staff. CNA Y indicated restorative doesn't always get done like assisting residents in walking. CNA Y indicated there are times call lights do not get answered timely as well. On 9/12/24 at 9:08AM, CNA Z indicated there are tasks that do not get done due to not having enough staff. CNA Z indicated staff do not always answer call lights timely because there is not enough staff and the staff working might be busy with someone else. Example: 2 R23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include in part: polyosteoarthritis (arthritis where at least 5 joints are affected), Polyneuropathy, Lymphedema (A buildup of lymph fluid that causes swelling), Difficulty in walking, and Low back pain. R23's chart indicates she is her own decision maker. R23's ADL (Activities of Daily Living) Care Plan, with a revision date of 5/2/23, indicates R23 requires staff intervention to complete ADL's. Interventions include, in part: .Hoyer (full body lift) sling with hole cut out for bed side commode toileting needs. On 9/9/24 at 3:00PM Surveyor interviewed R23 who indicated about once a month she waits an hour to get assistance with toileting. R23 indicated that a month ago she was sitting on the bedpan or the commode, could not recall which for certain, and after an hour called the front desk 3 to 4 times and no one came so she called the police. The police did not come as someone came to help her then and she called to tell them she received assistance. R23 said when this happens it makes her feel forgotten. Example 3 R35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include, in part: Parkinson's (A chronic brain disorder that affects movement, balance, and coordination), Type II Diabetes, Sick Sinus Syndrome (A type of heart rhythm disorder), and Presence of Cardiac Pacemaker. R35's most recent MDS (Minimum Data Set) with a target date of 7/25/24, indicates R35 has a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 11, indicating R35 has a mild cognitive impairment. Of note, R35's chart indicates he is his own decision maker. R35's ADL (Activities of Daily Living) Care Plan, with a revision date of 9/20/23, indicates, in part: .R35 requires extensive assist for ADLs/mobility . On 9/10/24 at 8:20AM Surveyor interviewed R35 who indicated when he puts his call light on staff will come in and shut the light off prior to assisting him. Staff say they will be back and don't come back. R35 indicated after 15 minutes he will put his light back on. R35 indicated when they shut the light off then if there is someone that has a minute, they don't know I need help. R35 indicated the facility is shorthanded and so he tries to be understanding, but around 2 to 3 times a week he will wait 30 to 60 minutes for assistance. R35 indicated sitting in my piss makes me mad.
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0809 (Tag F0809)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure each resident received meals at their desired ti...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure each resident received meals at their desired time in accordance with resident needs, preferences, or requests. This has the potential to affect all 58 residents residing at the facility. Residents (R8, R41, and R35) voiced concern regarding meals being served over an hour after the scheduled time. Surveyors observed meals being served 1-1.5 hours after the scheduled mealtimes. Evidenced by: The facility policy, Frequency of Meals, dated, 7/17, states, in part: .The following mealtimes have been established by our facility for residents, Breakfast 7:45AM, Lunch 11:45AM, Dinner 4:45PM . Example 1: R8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R8's most recent MDS (Minimum Data Set) with ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 7/14/24 indicated R8 has a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 13 indicating R8 is cognitively intact. R8 is own person. On 9/10/24 at 8:28AM, R8 indicated meals are often served over an hour after the scheduled mealtimes. R8 indicated today they didn't get lunch until after 1:00PM in the dining room. R8 indicated there has been times that supper doesn't come until 6:00PM or later. R8 indicated she will order snacks and get them sent to the facility; these snacks help hold her over because meals are often delivered so late. R8 indicated she was raised on a farm and her personal preference is to have breakfast before 8am, lunch at noon, and supper at 5pm. R8 indicated she always eats her meals in the dining room. R8 indicated staff know the meals are often late. Example 2: R41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R41's most recent MDS (Minimum Data Set) with a target date of 6/12/24, indicates R41 has a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 12, indicating R41 has a mild cognitive impairment. On 9/10/24 at 4:12PM, R41 indicated meals are always served late. R41 stated, It bothers me .it bothers everyone. R41 indicated R41 eats meals in the dining room and meals are often served an hour or more after the scheduled meal times. Example 3: R35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R35's most recent MDS (Minimum Data Set) with a target date of 7/25/24, indicates R35 has a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 11, indicating R35 has a mild cognitive impairment. On 9/10/24 at 8:28AM, Surveyor observed R35 receive breakfast tray in his room. On 9/11/24 at 8:33AM, Surveyor interviewed R35 who indicated that about 3 - 4 times a week his breakfast tray is late. R35 indicated that he eats slower due to his Parkinson's. R35 stated because the meals are served late when lunch comes, I will not want to eat again because the meals will be too close together. Example 4: On 9/9/24, Surveyor observed lunch being served in dining room at 1:00PM. On 9/10/24, Surveyor observed breakfast being served at 9:00AM in dining room. Surveyor observed the following posting of mealtimes: Breakfast 7:45AM, Lunch 11:45PM, Dinner 4:45PM in dining room. On 9/12/24 at 9:49AM, NSD W (Nutrition Services Director) indicated he has been working on building his team in the kitchen. NSD W indicated he had multiple new staff start for a couple weeks and then quit. NSD W indicated he knows the meals have been served late and this is due to call ins and one of the cooks is still getting down the routine. NSD W indicated he would expect meals to be served during the scheduled mealtimes.
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Staffing Data (Tag F0851)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure accurate reporting of the mandatory submission of staffing information based on payroll data to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Se...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure accurate reporting of the mandatory submission of staffing information based on payroll data to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS.) This has the potential to affect all 58 residents residing within the facility. The facility failed to enter accurate data in their Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) reporting and triggered for five fiscal year quarters, dated 4/1/23 - 6/30/24, for inadequate weekend staffing. This is evidenced by: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Electronic Staffing Data Submission Payroll-Based Journal, Long-term Care Facility Policy Manual, dated June 2022, states in part: Chapter 1: Overview, 1.1 introduction .(U) mandatory submission of staffing information based on payroll data in a uniform format. Long-term care facilities must electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, including information for agency and contract staff, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data in a uniform format according to specifications established by CMS.1.2 Submission Timelines and Accuracy. Direct care staffing and census data will be collected quarterly and is required to be timely and accurate . Report Quarter: staffing and census data will be collected for each fiscal quarter. Staffing data includes the number of hours paid to work by each staff member each day within a quarter. Census data includes the facility's census on the last day of each of the three months in a quarter. The fiscal quarters are as follows: Fiscal Quarter, Date range: 1 October 1 - December 31, (quarter 1) 2 January 1 - March 31, (quarter 2) 3 April 1 - June 30, (quarter 3) 4 July 1 - September 30 (quarter 4) . PBJ Staffing Data Report, CASPER Report (Certification and Survey Provider Enhanced Reports) 1705D for Fiscal year Quarter 3 2024 (April 1 - June 30), ran on 9/4/24 indicates the following: Metric: Excessively Low Weekend Staffing, Result: Triggered, Definition: Triggered = (equals) Submitted Weekend Staffing data is excessively low. PBJ Staffing Data Report, CASPER Report 1705D for Fiscal year Quarter 2 2024 (January 1 - March 31), ran on 9/4/24 indicates the following: Metric: Excessively Low Weekend Staffing, Result: Triggered, Definition: Triggered = Submitted Weekend Staffing data is excessively low. PBJ Staffing Data Report, CASPER Report 1705D for Fiscal year Quarter 1 2024 (October 1 - December 31), ran on 9/4/24 indicates the following: Metric: Excessively Low Weekend Staffing, Result: Triggered, Definition: Triggered = Submitted Weekend Staffing data is excessively low. PBJ Staffing Data Report, CASPER Report 1705D for Fiscal year Quarter 4 2023 (July 1 - September 30), ran on 9/4/24 indicates the following: Metric: Excessively Low Weekend Staffing, Result: Triggered, Definition: Triggered = Submitted Weekend Staffing data is excessively low. PBJ Staffing Data Report, CASPER Report 1705D for Fiscal year Quarter 3 2023 (April 1 - June 30), ran on 9/4/24 indicates the following: Metric: Excessively Low Weekend Staffing, Result: Triggered, Definition: Triggered = Submitted Weekend Staffing data is excessively low. The facility's Facility Assessment dated 8/1/24 states in part: .This facility assessment will be used to inform staffing decisions to ensure that there are a sufficient number of staff . consider specific staffing needs for each resident unit in the facility and adjust as necessary based on changes to its resident population . consider specific staffing needs for each shift, such as day, evening, night and adjust as necessary based on any changes to its resident population . The facility's Facility Assessment indicates Nurse Aide Hours per Resident Day (HRD) as 1.686 HRD, Nurse Aide Case Mix Hours per Resident Day as 2.291 HRD, and Nurse Aide Adjusted Hours per Resident Day as 1.656 HRD. On 9/10/24, Surveyor reviewed the facility's Daily Nurse Staffing Forms which indicated the following: On 1/6/24, the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) hours compute to 1.60 HRD. On 6/30/24, the CNA hours compute to 1.53 HRD. On 6/29/24, the CNA hours compute to 1.55 HRD. On 6/16/24, the CNA hours compute to 1.46 HRD. On 6/15/24, the CNA hours compute to 1.39 HRD. On 6/9/24, the CNA hours compute to 1.64 HRD. On 6/2/24, the CNA hours compute to 1.39 HRD. On 7/6/24, the CNA hours compute to 1.46 HRD. On 9/11/24 at 2:04 PM, Surveyor interviewed Scheduler E, who stated that she staffed according to census. Scheduler E was unsure about the facility assessment. Scheduler E stated they have no staffing concerns right now. Surveyor reviewed with Scheduler E the PBJ Staffing Data Report. Scheduler E stated that she did not understand how they could be triggering for low staffing. On 9/11/24 at 2:45 PM, Surveyor interviewed MDS Coordinator M (Minimum Data Set), who stated that the hours in the facility assessment are historical. MDS Coordinator M indicated that the facility assessment case mix hours would be used if there was higher acuity. MDS Coordinator M stated that the facility assessment staffing hours were sent to corporate who reviewed and approved the HRD for CNAs. On 9/11/24 at 2:50 PM, Surveyor interviewed DON B (Director of Nursing), who stated that the facility assessment had baseline hours for staffing that could be adjusted up or down based on acuity. Surveyor reviewed with DON B the PBJ Staffing Report. DON B indicated that June was a tough month for weekend staffing but that they always have a department head in the building on the weekends to help pass trays and answer call lights. DON B stated that these manager hours are not reflected in the PBJ staffing numbers.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility has not established an infection prevention and control program...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility has not established an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections such as COVID-19. This has the potential to affect the census of 58 residents (R). The facility infection prevention and control policies have not been updated annually. The facility did not ensure contact tracing and testing was completed accurately and timely during a COVID outbreak. Surveyor observed cares for R35 with breaches in infection control technique. Evidenced by: The facility policy titled Infection Prevention and Control Program dated 5/16/23, states, in part: The facility has established and maintains an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections as per acted national standards and guidelines . All staff are responsible for following all policies and procedures related to the program . A system of surveillance is utilized for prevention, identifying, reporting, investigating, and controlling infections and communicable diseases for all residents, staff, volunteers, visitors, and other individuals providing services under a contractual arrangement based upon a facility assessment and accepted national standards . The RNs (Registered Nurses) and LPNs (Licensed Practical Nurses) participate in surveillance through assessment of residents and reporting changes in condition to the residents' physicians and management staff, per protocol for notification of changes and in-house reporting of communicable diseases and infections . Anyone with even mild symptoms of COVID-19, regardless of vaccination status, should receive a viral test for SARS-CoV-2 as soon as possible. Asymptomatic residents with close contact with someone with SARS-CoV-2 infection should have a series of three viral tests for SARS-CoV-2 infection. Testing is recommended immediately (but not earlier than 24 hours after exposure) and, if negative, again 48 hours after the first negative test and, if negative, again 48 hours after the second negative test. This will typically be at day 1 (where day of exposure is day 0), day 3, and day 5 . If healthcare-associated transmission is suspected or identified, the facility may consider expanded testing of HCP (Health Care Personnel) and residents as determined by the distribution and number of cases throughout the facility and ability to identify close contacts. If and expanded testing (e.g., affected unit as opposed to the entire facility) approach is taken and testing identifies additional infections, testing should be expanded more broadly. If possible, testing should be repeated every 3-7 days until no new cases are identified for at least 14 days . Annual Review: a. The facility will conduct an annual review of the infection prevention and control program, including associated programs and policies and procedures based upon the facility assessment which includes any facility and community risk. b. Following review, the infection and prevention control program will be updated as necessary. Example 1: The following is a list of facility policies with their last review dates: -Infection Prevention and Control Program 5/16/23 -Infection Outbreak Response and Investigation 5/16/23 -Influenza Vaccination 8/30/23 -Pneumococcal Vaccine (Series) 8/30/23 -Legionella Surveillance no date -COVID-19 Vaccination 5/16/23 -Hand Hygiene 10/23 -Antibiotic Stewardship Program 12/23/22 On 9/11/23 at 2:57PM, Surveyor interviewed DON B (Director of Nursing) and ADON/IP C (Assistant Director of Nursing/Infection Preventionist). ADON C indicated she is the infection preventionist. DON B indicated she oversees the infection prevention and control program. DON B indicated policies should be reviewed annually. DON B indicated these policies listed have not been reviewed annually. Example 2: The facility had a COVID-19 outbreak in March 2024. The facility provided Surveyor with an outbreak folder containing documentation related to the outbreak. A document titled 3/5/24 COVID outbreak summarizing the facility COVID outbreak states: 1. 3/5/24 R613 began to have a change in condition with a cough and increased shortness of breath. Provider phoned and gave order to send patient to [Town Name] ER (emergency room). 2. 3/5/24 Around 10 pm nurse called to check on status of patient. ER explained the patient was being admitted for fluid overload and was COVID positive. 3. 3/6/24 Outbreak status initiated in facility and signage posted to notify visitors and outside providers. Housekeeping increasing sanitation of common areas. [Medical Director Name] the facility medical director notified. 4. R614 came to the nurses station early AM requesting her temperature be taken. Temperature taken and elevated at that time. R614 was then tested for COVID with positive results. COVID hallway opened and R614 placed on isolation. PCP (Primary Care Provider) phoned to notify. Contact tracing completed with R614. 5. R614 reported she had possibly exposed 4 other residents. The first resident being previously positive R613, whom she was seated by during tornado warning. She also reported possibly exposing R28, R618 and R13. All three of exposed residents COVID tested and negative at this time. 6. [County Name] county health department phoned and updated, and line list sent. 7. 3/8/24 PM shift R28 reported having a new cough and requested to be testing [sic] again for COVID with positive results. R28 placed on contact droplet isolation. R28 denies being within 6 ft (feet) of any peers for more than 15 minutes without a mask on. 8. 3/9/24 The other 2 exposed residents tested for COVID. R618 and R13 both testing negative for COVID. 9. 3/11/24 staff member DON B (Director of Nursing) tested positive for COVID and has not been in the facility without a mask on. Symptoms began 3/8/24 in the evening. R618 and R13 tested again for COVID with negative results. [County Name] health department RN (Registered Nurse) [Nurse Name] phoned and updated of newly positive staff member as well as resident. All residents updated of COVID status and residents contacted [sic] notified. 10. 3/12/21 R616 having increased abdominal girth along with lower extremity edema. Patient sent to ED (Emergency Department) and admitted COVID positive. R616 returned from hospital and re-admitted to facility. Resident placed on COVID hall on isolation. 11. 3/13/24 Line list updated and sent to [County Name] Health department. [County Name] health department phoned and updated. All residents and resident contacts updated of ongoing COVID status. 12. 3/14/24 R617 went to ER 3/13/24 and tested positive for COVID. She returned 3/14/24 and was placed on COVID isolation in room. [County Name] Health department updated, and this nurse spoke to nurse [Nurse Name] related to ongoing outbreak. Line list updated and sent to [County Name] health department. 13. 3/15/24 Handwashing audits completed in all departments. Housekeeping continues to increase sanitation to high trafficked areas. All residents notified and resident contacts notified of ongoing COVID outbreak. 14. 3/18/24 R47 had an emesis and was tested for COVID and positive. Patient was moved to COVID hall and placed on isolation precautions. PCP and family updated. Roommate R8 tested and negative at this time. 15. 3/19/24 contact tracing initiated for R47, and table mates tested for COVID. R9 noted to be positive for COVID. Patient moved to COVID hall and placed on isolation precautions. PCP updated as well as family. R619 tested as was a tablemate and negative at this time. All residents in facility updated of ongoing COVID outbreak as well as resident contacts. R18 reported generalized malaise. Resident tested for COVID and positive. Roommate [sic] R43 tested and negative for COVID per contact tracing protocol. 16. 3/21/24 Per contact tracing protocol R8 re-tested for COVID and positive at this time. R8 was moved to COVID hall and placed on isolation precautions. PCP (Primary Care Provider), Family as well as residents in building updated on continue [sic] COVID outbreak. Ongoing enhanced cleaning of highly traffics [sic] area ongoing for 2 weeks post last positive patient. 17. COVID outbreak officially closed 4/1/24. Please see line list for dates. [County Name] updated. On 9/11/24 at 2:57PM, Surveyor interviewed DON B and ADON C. Surveyor asked why contact tracing had not been completed for R613, the first resident with COVID. ADON C indicated R613 never leaves her room and eats in her room. Of note, there was a tornado drill where R613 exposed a minimum of one other resident, R614. Surveyor asked if contact tracing had been completed for R616 after testing positive for COVID. DON B and ADON C indicated since they had not added contact tracing to the summary, they did not complete contact tracing for her. They indicated she always stays in her room. Surveyor presented a nurse progress note dated 3/8/24 at 13:56 (1:56PM) that states pt (patient) up in w/c (wheelchair) and to the MDR (Main Dining Room) for meals, pleasant and cooperative so far this shift and has no c/o (complaints of). DON B indicated contact tracing should have been completed for R616 if she was eating her meals in the main dining room. Of note, contact tracing was not completed for R613 and R614. R47 tested positive on 3/18/24 after having an emesis. R47's nurse progress note dated 3/18/24 at 22:40 (10:40PM) states, in part, Writer informed by CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) that resident has large emisis [sic] of undigested food . Resident has had a slight cough this weekend, Rapid COVID test done showing Positive results . On 9/12/24 at 8:40AM, Surveyor interviewed DON B. Surveyor asked if the facility should have waited until Monday 3/18/24 to test R47 for COVID as she was showing signs and symptoms over the weekend. DON B indicated she would have expected the facility to test R47 sooner and should not have waited until Monday if she was showing signs over the weekend. The COVID outbreak folder also contained testing documentation completed during the outbreak. On 3/6/24, R614 indicated she possibly exposed three other residents, R28, R618, and R13. R28 was tested on [DATE] and positive. R618 and R13 were tested on [DATE] and 3/11/24. On 9/12/24 at 8:40AM, Surveyor interviewed DON B. Surveyor asked if testing was completed per the facility policy and standard of practice for R28, R618, and R13 as these residents should have been tested on [DATE]. DON B agreed R28, R618, and R13 should have been tested on [DATE] and were not. On 3/18/24, R8 was exposed. R8 was tested on [DATE] with negative results and again on 3/21/24 with positive results. On 9/12/24 at 8:40AM, Surveyor interviewed DON B. Surveyor asked if testing was completed per the facility policy and standard of practice for R8 as she should have been tested on [DATE]. DON B agreed R8 should have been tested on [DATE] and was not. On 3/18/24, R619 and R43 were exposed to a positive resident. R619 and R43 were tested on [DATE], 3/22/24, and 3/24/24. On 9/12/24 at 8:40AM, Surveyor interviewed DON B. Surveyor asked if testing was completed per the facility policy and standard of practice for R619 and R43 as testing should have been completed on 3/19/24, 3/21/24, and 3/23/24. DON B agreed testing should have been completed on 3/19/24, 3/21/24, and 3/23/24 and was not. R12, R26, R41, and R14 were tested on [DATE], 3/24/24, and 3/27/24. On 9/12/24 at 8:40AM, Surveyor interviewed DON B. Surveyor asked if testing was completed per the facility policy and standard of practice for R12, R26, R41, and R14 as they should have been tested on [DATE], 3/23/24, and 3/25/24. DON B agreed testing should have been completed on 3/21/24, 3/23/24, and 3/25/24 and was not. The facility did not review policies and procedures within the required time frame of annually. The facility did not contact trace for two residents, R613 and R614. The facility did not test for COVID timely for 11 residents, R8, R12, R13, R14, R26, R28, R41, R43, R47, R618, and R619. Example 3: R35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 9/12/24 at 10:18AM, Surveyor observed CNA DD (Certified Nursing Assistant) and CNA R assist R35 in getting washed up. CNA R took clean washcloths to the sink, wet the washcloths under the running water and set each washcloth on the edge of the sink while she wet the next one. CNA R then used these washcloths to wash R35's upper body and for peri-care with the brief change. During cares CNA R obtained a container of zinc oxide from a shelf in R35's room. CNA R then took her gloved hand and placed it into the container of zinc oxide and applied it to R35's buttock. CNA R then placed the same gloved hand back into the container of zinc oxide and applied it to bilateral groin areas. After cares were completed, Surveyor interviewed CNA R. During this interview CNA R indicated the sink could be considered contaminated and that she should not have set the washcloths on the edge of the sink prior to using them for cares. CNA R indicated she has not been trained not to use a gloved hand to remove the zinc oxide from the container. CNA R indicated that after applying the zinc oxide to R35's buttock she should not have used the same gloved hand to obtain more zinc oxide from the container and she should not have applied to the groin area with that same gloved hand after she had applied to his buttock. On 9/12/24 at 11:53AM, Surveyor interviewed DON B (Director of Nursing) and reviewed the above observation. During the interview, DON B indicated that the washcloths should not have been set on the sink, they should be wet and then go straight to the resident for use. DON B indicated the CNA should not have reinserted her gloved hand into the container of zinc oxide, should put the zinc oxide in a cup using a plastic spoon, and should not use a gloved hand directly in the container. DON B indicated that the CNA should have either applied the zinc oxide from front to back or should have changed gloves between application to buttock and groin area.
Mar 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0658 (Tag F0658)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure medication administration was provi...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure medication administration was provided according to professional standards for one resident (R) out of nine sampled (R4). Specifically, the facility failed to follow physician insulin orders in the electronic medical record (EMR) and document the rationale for not administering the insulin. This failure had the potential to cause R4 not to receive the necessary care for treatment of R4's diabetes. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Timely Administration of Insulin dated 4/23/23 revealed, .It is the policy of this facility to provide timely administration of insulin in order to meet the needs of each resident and to prevent adverse effects on a resident's condition . and .All insulin will be administered in accordance with physician's orders . Review of R4's undated admission Record, located in the Resident Documents tab of the EMR, revealed R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of diabetes. Review of R4's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 1/16/24, located in the EMR under the MDS tab, indicated R4 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 of 15, which indicated R4 was cognitively intact. Review of the hospital discharge summary dated 1/11/24 revealed that the document was signed by a physician at the hospital and the insulin order indicated Humulin R U-500 (concentrated) 150 units three times a day with meals subcutaneously (injection under the skin). Review of R4's January 2024 Physician Orders, located in the Orders tab of the EMR, revealed orders for .Humulin R U-500 (concentrated) 150 units three times a day with meals subcutaneously (under the skin .) Further review of R4's January 2024 MAR revealed R4 did not receive her scheduled insulin from 1/11/24 at 5:00 PM through 1/15/24 at 5:00 PM. Review of R4's Progress Notes, located in the Resident Documents tab of the EMR on 1/11/24 at 1:29 PM, revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 2 notified R4's physician regarding admission and approval of the hospital discharge orders, which were signed by the hospital physician. The physician approved the admitting orders at 4:06 PM, which included the insulin. Further review of R4's Progress Notes, dated 1/11/24, revealed Registered Nurse (RN) 3 notified the on-call physician at 7:10 PM regarding the high dose of insulin scheduled and the on-call physician gave orders .to hold tonight's dose and call primary care physician in the morning . Review of R4's January 2024 Medication Administration Record (MAR) for 1/11/24 revealed R4's blood sugar at 4:00 PM was 211 with a notation of .four - other/see nurses notes . Continued review of R4's Progress Notes for 1/12/24 revealed LPN 1 notified R4's Nurse Practitioner (NP) regarding the insulin dose at 10:20 AM. A message was left with no return call. RN3 contacted the NP at 10:59 PM regarding the insulin dosage, with no return call. R4 did not receive her scheduled insulin that day with no additional documentation noted in the Progress Notes by nursing staff that indicated the rationale for holding R4's insulin. Review of R4's January 2024 MAR for 1/12/24 revealed R4's blood sugars at 7:30 AM were 74, 11:00 AM 125 and at 4:00 PM 167 with a notation of .four - other/see nurses notes . There was no documentation in R4's Progress Notes for 1/13/24, that the facility had received a response from the on-call physician or NP for calls made on 1/12/24. Continued review of R4's Progress Notes for 1/14/24 revealed the facility did not make any additional calls to the on-call physician or NP R4 did not receive her scheduled insulin on 1/13/24 or 1/14/24 with no additional documentation noted by nursing staff that indicated the rationale for holding R4's insulin Review of R4's January 2024 MAR for 1/13/24 revealed R4's blood sugars at 7:30 AM were 303, 11:00 AM 47 and at 4:00 PM 54. Documentation revealed R4 was asymptomatic with the 11:00 AM and 4:00 PM blood sugar readings, with no additional documentation noted that indicated any action taken by nursing staff for the low blood sugar readings. Continued review of R4's January 2024 MAR for 1/14/24 revealed R4's blood sugars were at 7:30 AM 182, 11:00 AM 275 and at 4:00 PM 321 with notations on each day of .one - hold/see nurses notes . Review of R4's Progress Notes written by LPN 1 for 1/15/24 revealed the facility had not received a response from messages left for the on-call physician or NP. Progress notes revealed LPN 1 made additional calls to the NP with no response. R4 did not receive her scheduled insulin that day. Progress Notes written by RN3 revealed R4 was transferred to the Emergency Department (ED) on 1/15/24 at 8:10 PM. R4 returned to the facility on 1/16/24 at 2:00 AM. Review of ED discharge documents, dated 1/15/24, revealed the ED adjusted R4's insulin for 30 units with meals, and to contact R4's physician in the morning [01/16/24] for a specific insulin dose. R4 left the facility against medical advice on 1/16/24 at 10:00 PM. Review of R4's January 2024 MAR for 1/15/24 revealed R4's blood sugars at 7:30 AM were 314, 11:00 AM 398 and at 4:00 PM 564 with notations on each day of .one - hold/see nurses notes . During an interview on 3/7/24 at 11:30 AM the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) stated the nurses were .uncomfortable . with administering the large dose of insulin prescribed for R4 and had contacted the NP for clarification of the dose with no return calls. During an interview on 3/7/24 at 12:20 PM, R4's physician stated she had approved the admitting orders on 1/11/24, which included the insulin dose and was unable to state why the NP did not return calls, or messages, to the facility. During an interview on 3/7/24 at 1:00 PM the Director of Nursing (DON) stated she was aware the facility had difficulty contacting the NP or the on-call physician for R4.
Nov 2023 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0808 (Tag F0808)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure residents receive and consume foods in the appro...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure residents receive and consume foods in the appropriate therapeutic diet for 1 (R4) of 3 residents sampled for altered special diets out of 4 total sampled residents. R4 did not receive a controlled carbohydrate diet as ordered by her physician. This is evidenced by: The facility policy entitled, Food and Nutrition Services, undated, states in part: . 1. The multidisciplinary staff, including nursing staff, the attending physician and the dietitian will assess each resident's nutritional needs, food likes, dislikes and eating habits, as well as physical, functional, and psychosocial factors that affect eating and nutritional intake and utilization. 2. A resident-centered diet and nutrition plan will be based on this assessment . 7. Food and nutrition services staff will inspect food trays to ensure that the correct meal is provided to each resident, the food appears palatable and attractive, and it is served at a safe and appetizing temperature . R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of: type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications (characterized by high levels of sugar in the blood), chronic kidney disease stage 5 (a disease characterized by progressive damage and loss of function in the kidneys), and acute kidney failure. R4's Physician Order, dated 6/19/23, indicates: Renal, Controlled Carbohydrate diet, regular texture, regular/thin consistency. On 11/1/23, R4's lunch meal tickets states, in part: Renal/Regular . (It is important to note that there is not a special request section on R4's lunch ticket.) On 11/1/23 at 12:34 PM, Surveyor observed R4 receive her lunch, which consisted of a hamburger patty, a slice of cheese, a hamburger bun, corn, and an orange cake. On 11/1/23 at 2:13 PM, Surveyor interviewed [NAME] C. Surveyor asked [NAME] C to explain the location on the meal tickets that indicate a carbohydrate controlled diet, he indicated that it is in the special requests section. [NAME] C obtained 3 other residents meal tickets and demonstrated the carbohydrate controlled diet on those meal tickets. [NAME] C indicated the diets go through the dietary manager (DM) and he follows up with the DM as needed. On 11/1/23 at 2:18 PM, Surveyor interviewed DM D. DM D indicated he receives the dietary order from the nurses that receive the order from the physician. Surveyor provided R4's lunch meal ticket to DM D and asked if R4 received a carbohydrate controlled diet today, he indicated she did not, he did not know how long she had not been receiving a carbohydrate controlled diet and she should have received the correct diet.
Jun 2023 12 deficiencies 2 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Notification of Changes (Tag F0580)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility did not immediately consult with a resident's physician when there was a need...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility did not immediately consult with a resident's physician when there was a need to alter treatment for 1 of 7 residents (R63) that resulted in actual harmy, and 1 of 7 residents (R61) that had potential for minimal harm. The facility did not consult with R63's Medical Doctor (MD) per Physician Orders and as her condition changed resulting in actual harm when R63 was hospitalized and aggressive diuresis. Evidenced by: Facility policy, entitled Notifications of Change, date implemented 12/2022, states in part .the purpose of this policy is to ensure the facility promptly informs the resident, consults the resident's physician, and notifies, consistent with his or her authority, the resident's representative when there is a change requiring notification . the facility must inform the resident, consult with the residence physician and or notify the resident's family member or legal representative when there is a change requiring such notification: circumstances requiring notification include: significant change in the resident's physical, mental or psychosocial condition . circumstances that require a need to alter treatment . it's for our discharge of the resident from the facility . Example 1: R63 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including asthma, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), acute and chronic respiratory failure, dependence on supplemental oxygen, Nonrheumatic aortic valve stenosis (narrowing of a valve between the left lower chamber of heart and a major blood vessel/aorta), and Heart Failure with preserved ejection fraction (a type of heart failure that affects the left side of the heart, especially the lower chamber called the left ventricle. It occurs when the left ventricle is stiff and cannot relax and fill with blood properly. This causes high pressure inside the heart and reduces the blood flow to the rest of the body.) R63's Hospital Discharge Summary and discharge instructions, dated [DATE], include, in part: . Heart Failure Care: Weigh yourself daily. Call your physician for any weight gain of more than 2 lbs (pounds) in 24-hour period or 5lbs in one week. Take your weight record to your doctors on your follow up . Notify your physician of any of the following and/or seek attention immediately if develop: . swelling in your legs, feet, or ankles, increased shortness of breath with activity or SOB (shortness of breath) at night while lying flat, weight gain of 2lbs in 24-hour period or 5lbs in one week, nausea, feeling more tired or weaker than usual . Go to the emergency room or call 911 if you have new or increased chest pain or moderate to severe shortness of breath to the point that you cannot speak, weakness, or numbness of extremity, not able to speak or have difficulty finding words, change in vision, or confusion. R63's Physician Orders, for 4/5/23-4/30/23, include in part: daily weight every day shift for CHF (Congestive Heart Failure) . call physician for any weight gain more than 2 lbs in 24 hours . (It is important to note this does not include 5lbs weight gain in one week as the discharge instructions stated.) R63's Medical Record included the following: R63's Nurses Note, dated 4/5/2023, includes: .Resident admitted to facility per stretcher via ambulance. Resident is alert and oriented. States she is here for strengthening . ambulates with assist of one and a walker. Resident walked to the toilet, SOB (Shortness of breath) noted on rest and exertion. Resident is oriented to room and controls . able to make needs known . All cares complete per care plan. No signs or symptoms of distress noted. R63's weight, 4/5/23, 310.0 Lbs. R63's Heart Failure Clinic (HFC) Note, dated 4/13/23, includes in part: If weight gain is 3 or more pounds in one day or 5 pounds in one week, call Heart Failure Clinic .Check swelling in your feet, legs, abdomen - call HFC if you notice increase in swelling . Are you experiencing SOB? Call HFC if you notice worsening shortness of breath with activity or shortness of breath when you are lying down . If you are having trouble breathing while sitting or at rest, go to ER or call 911. If you notice tiredness, weakness, lightheadedness, call HFC. R63's Nurse Note, dated 4/13/23, includes: . returned from medical appt . was seen by Cardiology. R63's weight, 4/13/23, 311.2 Lbs. R63's Nurse Note, dated 4/14/23, includes: .writer called R63's MD (Medical Doctor) regarding critical lab value of Carbon Dioxide level 44 . left message with clinical staff . awaiting return call. (It is important to note the facility did not provide evidence of a return call by R63's MD to consult about critical lab values.) R63's weight, 4/14/23, No weight recorded. (It is important to note the facility did not provide evidence of R63's weight being recorded for this date.) R63's weight, 4/15/23, 309.9 Lbs. R63's weight, 4/16/23, 310.4 Lbs. R63's Nurse Notes, dated 4/16/23, include: .alert with baseline mentation . uses oxygen continuous at 4L/minute via nasal canula to maintain oxygen saturation level greater than 90% . becomes SOB and easily fatigued with physical activity. Breath sounds diminished throughout bilateral lungs. No cough or congestion . lacks motivation to assist with cares . spends day in room lying in bed or sitting on chair watching tv. No increased edema noted to bilateral lower extremities . has a fluid filled blister to top of left foot . R63's Nurse Note, dated 4/17/23 includes: Resident with 4+ edema in her feet and lower legs. States I wish I could get rid of this fluid, but does not want to elevate her feet while in bed and is not compliant with her fluid restriction. Reported that when she got up to the bathroom a few minutes ago her left foot was wet and she believed it was weeping. No weeping noted by this writer at this time . Writer received call from R63's MD office. Writer informed MD . fluid filled blister, elevated Carbon Dioxide level, noncompliance . staff to continue to educate and encourage. R63's weight, 4/17/23, 311.6 Lbs. R63's weight, 4/18/23, 311.8 Lbs. R63's weight, 4/19/23, 313.8 Lbs. (Note this is a 2lb weight gain in 24 hrs with no MD notification). R63's Nurse Notes, 4/19/23, includes: . alert with baseline mentation . uses oxygen continuous at 4 L/minute via nasal canula to maintain oxygen saturation level greater than 90% during the day hours and 5 L at night . becomes SOB and easily fatigued with physical activity . becomes SOB when lying flat. Breath sounds diminished throughout bilateral lungs . No cough or congestion . lacks motivation to participate in cares . spends day in room lying in bed or sitting in chair watching tv. R63's Consultation Report, dated 4/19/23, includes: change Lasix to after lunch, please avoid processed meat and canned foods . (The facility did not provide evidence of R63's weights being reviewed or her increased edema being addressed with the MD.) R63's Nurse Notes, 4/20/23, includes: . alert with baseline mentation . uses oxygen continuous at 4 L/minute via nasal canula to maintain oxygen saturation level greater than 90% during the day hours and 5 L at night . becomes SOB and easily fatigued with physical activity . becomes SOB when lying flat. Breath sounds diminished throughout bilateral lungs . No cough or congestion . lacks motivation to participate in cares . spends day in room lying in bed or sitting in chair watching tv. R63's weight, 4/20/23, 315.0 Lbs. (It is important to note this weight gain of 5 Lbs. since 4/15/23. The facility failed to consult with R63's MD regarding this weight increase.) R63's Nurse Notes, 4/21/23, include: The patient is alert and oriented x 3. She is cooperative with nursing interventions and consumes meals in her room per her choice. She is on a fluid restriction and is non-compliant drinking extra fluids in her room. BMP (Basic Metabolic Panel - a blood test for metabolism) completed this am and faxed to clinic; awaiting response. VS taken; BP 140/68, resp 20, pulse 88, temp 97.6. R63's weight, 4/21/23, 317.0 Lbs. (It is important to note R63's weight has increased by 2 Lbs. in 24 hours and 7 pounds since 4/15/23 and the facility did not provide evidence of notifying R63's MD regarding this weight increase.) R63's weight, 4/22/23, 319.4 Lbs. (It is important to note R63's weight increase of 2 additional pounds in 24 hours and 9 Lbs. in one week with no evidence R63's MD was consulted with regarding this.) R63's weight, 4/23/23, 320.8 Lbs. (It is important to note R63's weight continues to go up. The facility provided no evidence of MD notification.) R63's weight, 4/24/23, 319.8 Lbs. R63's Nurse Notes, dated 4/24/23, include: . alert with baseline mentation . uses oxygen continuous at 4L/minute via nasal canula to maintain . greater than 90% during day hours and 5L at night . becomes SOB and easily fatigued with physical activity . becomes SOB when lying flat. Breath sounds diminished throughout . No cough or congestion . lacks motivation to assist with cares . spends day in room lying in bed or sitting on chair watching tv. Increased edema to bilateral lower extremities and bilateral upper extremities . (it is important to note the increase in edema to R63's lower and upper extremities.) R63's weight, 4/25/23, 320.8 Lbs. R63's Nurse Notes, dated 4/25/23, include: . alert with baseline mentation . uses oxygen continuous at 4L/minute via nasal canula to maintain . greater than 90% during day hours and 5L at night . becomes SOB and easily fatigued with physical activity . becomes SOB when lying flat. Breath sounds diminished throughout . No cough or congestion . lacks motivation to assist with cares . spends day in room lying in bed or sitting on chair watching tv. Increased edema to bilateral lower extremities and bilateral upper extremities .Today's BMP results received. Results faxed to heart failure clinic per MD instructions along with today's weight. (It is important to note the facility did not provide evidence of R63's heart failure clinic or MD consulting with facility regarding R63's increased edema, increased weight, or lack of motivation.) R63's Nurse Notes, dated 4/26/23, include: Patient is alert with baseline mentation . uses oxygen continuous at 4L/minute via nasal canula to maintain oxygen saturation greater than 90% during the day hours and 5L at night . becomes SOB and easily fatigued with physical activity . becomes SOB when lying flat. Breath sounds diminished throughout . No cough or congestion . lacks motivation to assist with cares . Increased edema to bilateral lower and upper extremities . MD updated with today's CBC (complete blood count- blood test) results. R63's weight, 4/26/23, 321.8 Lbs. R63's Nurse Note, 4/27/23, includes: Patient currently out of building on her way to cardiologist appointment. Pt alert with baseline mentation. Pt uses O2 continuous @ 4L/min via NC to maintain POX > 90% during day hours and 5L t night . becomes SOB and easily fatigued with physical activity . becomes SOB when lying flat. Breath sounds diminished throughout . No cough or congestion . lacks motivation to assist with cares . Increased edema to bilateral lower and upper extremities . Resident admitted to hospital from cardiologist doctor appointment admitted for fluid overload. History: Writer spoke with R63's daughter, on 4/27/23, patient has had a weight gain of 0.5 Lbs. per day, increased edema in lower bilateral extremities, and increased shortness of breath. Today's weight is 319.0 Lbs . Telephone encounter by Cardiologist: on 4/24/23 spoke with facility RN to increase furosemide to 40 mg twice daily. BMP and see me on 4/27/23 R63's Cardiology Follow Up Note, dated 4/27/23, includes: The patients daughter who works in the emergency room called a few days ago complaining of a 10 pound plus weight gain. I doubled her furosemide dose to 40mg twice daily. This has not made a difference. She has gained about 15 pounds since discharge from the hospital (4/5/23). The patient also admits to worsening shortness of breath and orthopnea. She has conversational dyspnea. Assessment: The patient is grossly volume overloaded. She is not doing well on an increased dose of oral loop diuretic therapy. She will need inpatient management for aggressive diuresis. Extremities: Gross bilateral lower extremity pitting edema . Weight 322Lbs. R63's Hospital Summary, dated 5/14/23, includes: admission 4/27/23 .discharged [DATE] with diagnoses of COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease) and CHF (Congestive Heart Failure) Exacerbation and was found to be in Atrial Fibrillation with RVR (rapid ventricular rate). She spent a couple weeks in the hospital and was on Lasix drip . IV Lasix 5cc through continuous infusion . On 6/14/23 at 3:14 PM, during an interview, RN Y (Registered Nurse) indicated when R63's weight gain reached 5 Lbs. in one week the nurse on the unit should have consulted the Heart Failure Clinic and/or R63's MD. RN Y also indicated staff should have called and consulted R63's physician regarding her increased edema. On 6/14/23 at 4:55 PM, ADON C indicated R63's daughter called the Cardiologist regarding R63's weight gain, lack of motivation, and worsening edema on 4/24/23. ADON C indicated the facility should not have relied on R63's daughter to contact R63's MD and should have kept the HFC and R63's MD apprised of her changing condition and should have followed MD orders of when to update. ADON C indicated the facility should have updated R63's MD on her changing condition. On 6/15/23 at 9:29 AM, NHA A, DON B, and ADON C indicated R63 was non-complaint with her fluid restrictions, elevating her lower extremities, and wearing her compression stockings. NHA A, DON B, and ADON C indicated the nurse on the unit should have consulted with R63's MD with her weight gain of 5 Lbs. in one week and her increase in edema when it was noted. Of note, there is no evidence the facility provided risks and benefits to R63 regarding following fluid restriction and elevation of lower extremities. The facility failed to notify the HFC and MD of R63's weight gain per physician's orders. R63 was hospitalized and required intravenous diuretic therapy. R1's physician was not updated when resident had a change of condition. This example is at a level 2 potential for harm/isolated. Example 2 R61's Nurse's Notes document the following: 12/9/2022 21:29 (9:29 PM) Note Text: Res (Resident) sleeping very soundly at start of shift. vitals and bgm (blood glucose monitoring) taken and res did not wake. Res was on room air o2 (oxygen) was at 76 (%). O2 applied at 2l (liters) via NC (nasal cannula) O2 came up to 85 (%). O2 bumped up to 3liters. o2 in 90s. Res awake and was told these findings also res had periods of apnea. This writer explained to res it would be wise ro keep o2 while in bed. Res agreed as well as husband on the phone. Res in stable condition, all cares complete per care plan. No s/s (signs and symptoms) of distress noted. [SIC] On 6/14/23 at 11:40 AM, Surveyor interviewed LPN H (Licensed Practical Nurse). Surveyor asked LPN H when a resident has a change in their oxygen level, when should the Provider be updated; LPN H stated, at the time it happens. Surveyor asked LPN H how she would inform the Provider of a change in oxygen level, LPN H said call, it is a change of condition. On 6/14/23 at 2:36 PM, Surveyor interviewed DON B (Director of Nursing). Surveyor asked DON B should a Provider be updated if the residents' oxygen level changes, DON B stated yes. Surveyor asked DON B when would you expect staff to inform a provider of a change in a residents' oxygen level, DON B said they should have updated the on call Physician and sent an update to the Primary Care Provider. It is important to note that there was no documentation in R61's medical record that a provider was ever made aware of this change in her oxygen level.
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Deficiency F0883 (Tag F0883)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility did not offer and/or administer the influenza immunization to each resident, ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility did not offer and/or administer the influenza immunization to each resident, and the resident's medical record does not include documentation the resident either received, refused, or was educated on the risks and benefits of the influenza and immunization for 1 of 6 (R64) residents reviewed for immunizations that resulted in actual harm, and 2 of 6 residents (R34 and R27) reviewed for immunizations that resulted in the potential for harm. R64 consented to have the influenza immunization upon admission to the facility. R64 did not receive the immunization and then contracted Influenza A which resulted in a complex hospitalization. Evidenced by: The facility's policy titled Influenza Vaccination dated 12/2022, states in part: Policy: it is the policy of this facility to minimize the risk of acquiring, transmitting, or experiencing complications from influenza by offering our residents, staff members, and volunteer workers annual immunization against influenza. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: .7. Individuals receiving the influenza vaccine< or their legal representative, will be required to sign a consent form prior to the administration of the vaccine. The completed, signed, and dated record will be filed in the individual's medical record .9. The resident's medical record will include documentation that the resident and/or the resident's representative was provided education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of immunization, and that the resident received or did not receive the immunization due to medical contraindication or refusal . According to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) article titled Flu Vaccine Provided Substantial Protection This Season dated 2/22/23, This year's flu vaccine reduced the risk of influenza A-related hospitalization among adults by nearly half according to the CDC Flu vaccine effectiveness against circulating influenza A (H1N1) viruses was 56% .Adults 65 years and older were 35% less likely to have flu-related hospitalization . Example 1: R64 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include: Parkinson's Disease, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, asthma, history of COVID-19, and congestive heart failure. R64's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] states that R64 has a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 out of 15 indicating that R64 is cognitively intact. On 10/3/22, the facility's former ADON (Assistant Director of Nursing) obtained verbal consent from R64 to receive the influenza vaccine and co-signed the Vaccine Administration Record (VAR) - Informed Consent for Vaccination form. It is important to note that the back of the form that typically includes the vaccine specific information, date given, and signature of the person administering the vaccine is missing on R64's form. On 10/4/22, the facility held a flu clinic to administer the influenza vaccine. The facility's ADON kept track of resident's vaccinations on a resident roster. That roster indicates that R64 received the influenza vaccination. R64's Wisconsin Immunization Registry (WIR) states that R64 received the influenza vaccine on 2/8/23. (Of note, this was after R64 contracted Influenza A and was hospitalized .) The facility's nurse's notes state the following: 12/4/22 at 10:55 AM: Resident requesting PRN (as needed) geri-tussin for non-productive cough .faxes sent to communicate all concerns. 12/4/22 at 7:30 PM: R64 stated that she didn't feel great. T-97.4, P-84, R18, O2 sat (oxygen saturation) 97% on room air. Noted an occasional dry cough. She also stated that she could not taste. Episodes of flushed face .Lungs clear with occasional expiratory wheezes. COVID rapid test completed, results negative . 12/5/22 at 10:51 AM: .Resident c/o (complained of) increased congestion and cough. COVID test negative. SPO2 96% on room air. Call placed to MD regarding symptoms . 12/5/22 at 9:23 PM: New orders obtained for labs and STAT chest x-ray. Orders to send to ER (Emergency Room) for eval (evaluation) if symptoms worsen or at resident request. Resident had PRN acetaminophen, remains afebrile. Resident continues to c/o (complain of) malaise but denies increased symptoms. Slept intermittently throughout the shift. Non- productive cough noted. Refused to go to the ER for eval, wanting to wait here for chest x-ray. 12/5/22 at 9:44 PM: Technician arrived at facility for chest x-ray. 12/6/22 at 7:11 AM: Chest x-ray results negative and sent to [MD] for review. Requesting orders for flu testing . 12/6/22 at 9:54 AM: Writer called [MD] office requesting to test and treat for the flu, awaiting response. 12/6/22 at 2:21 PM: New orders for COVID PCR, Influenza A/B and RSV swab. Swab taken to [hospital] for processing . 12/6/22 at 11:05 PM: Resident alert and cooperative. Resident lying in bed and appears lethargic. Audible wheezing heard at bedside. Temp. 96.7, b/p (blood pressure) 151/77, HR (Heart rate) 72 PsO2[sic] 90-94%, R (respirations) 18 and resident reports S.O.B (shortness of breath), wheezing, diminished lung sounds not [sic] to right upper lobe. Resident able to cough and clear some congestion. Resident agreed at this time to be seen in the ER and was sent to [hospital] for eval and treat. Call placed to ER for an update and resident was found positive for the flu and admitted . Hospital H&P (History and Physical) dated 12/12/22 states in part: . presented with SOB, wheeze, and chest discomfort on 12/6/22. Initially diagnosed with exacerbation of asthma. Influenza A positive in ED (Emergency Department). Started on Tamiflu (anti-viral) and Solu-Medrol (steroid) and azithromycin (antibiotic). On presentation, mild elevation of troponin thought secondary to demand ischemia from dyspnea. On presentation patient was afebrile, normotensive, normal heart rate, normal O2 sat, no leukocytosis . On 12/8/22, patient noted to be hypoxic and lethargic- ABG (Arterial Blood Gas) with hypoxemia, started on supplemental O2, CXR (Chest x-ray) with new perihilar infiltrates (suggestive of pneumonia) . Patient required increasing O2 supplementation and then placed on BiPAP with no significant improvement- transferred to ICU (Intensive Care Unit) for continued monitoring. Patient was intubated on 12/9/22, at approximately 3:00 AM after intubation, patient went into VT (Ventricular Tachycardia/irregular rapid heartbeat that leads to cardiac arrest if not corrected) arrest, achieved ROSC (Return of Spontaneous Circulation) within 2 minutes. Sputum and blood cultures taken on 12/8/22 have grown MSSA (Methicillin Sensitive Staph aureus- a type of bacteria). Antibiotics changed to Cefazolin on 12/9/22 . R64 remained on the ventilator until 12/18/22 and was finally discharged from the hospital on [DATE]. On 6/14/23 at 10:20 AM, Surveyor interviewed DON B (Director of Nursing). Surveyor asked DON B what the facility's process is when a resident consents to receiving the influenza vaccine, DON B stated that the resident should get it. Surveyor asked DON B how the nurse is made aware of the consent, DON B stated that the consent should be in the admission packet, they get the consent signed, and then they place an order for the influenza vaccine. DON B also reported that last year, the facility had the pharmacy come into the facility on October 4, 2022, for vaccination administration. Surveyor asked DON B to explain why R64 did not receive the vaccine, DON B stated that she thought that R64 had received it and that she would have to get back to this Surveyor. Surveyor asked DON B if she was aware or recognized that R64 did not receive the vaccine, DON B stated no. It is important to note that the facility was also unaware that the pharmacy (from Illinois) did not submit the vaccination records to WIR. On 6/14/23 at 11:06 AM, DON B reported to Surveyor that R64 approached the former ADON Z asking for the vaccine and that his tracking sheet indicates that she received the vaccination. On 6/14/23 at 11:09 AM, Surveyor interviewed former ADON Z. Surveyor asked ADON Z if he administered the influenza vaccination to R64, ADON Z stated that R64 returned from an appointment after the pharmacy's flu clinic was over, so he administered the vaccination to R64. Surveyor asked ADON Z where he documented the administration of the vaccine, ADON Z stated that he thought he wrote it on the back of one of the forms. Surveyor asked ADON Z if he documented it in the nurse's notes, ADON Z stated probably not. On 6/14/23 at 11:15 AM, Surveyor called the pharmacy that held the flu clinic at the facility. Surveyor spoke with PT AA (Pharmacy Tech). Surveyor asked PT AA if they have any documentation of R64 receiving the influenza vaccination, PT AA stated that she couldn't see anywhere that R64 received it from them and that they didn't have any forms scanned into their system. On 6/14/23 at 11:35 AM, Surveyor interviewed R64. Surveyor asked R64 if ADON Z had given her the influenza vaccination, R64 stated that she had asked for it several times, but they just kept putting her off. R64 stated that she never received the influenza vaccination while at the facility. On 6/14/23 at 12:15 PM, Surveyor met with ADON C. Surveyor asked ADON C if they were able to find the back side of the form or if they had received any documentation from the pharmacy, ADON C reported that the pharmacy didn't have anything, and that ADON Z had given it after they had left, so they wouldn't have the form anyway. The facility was unable to provide any documentation showing that R64 received the influenza vaccination. R64 states she did not receive the vaccine prior to contracting Influenza A. R64 contracted Influenza A which resulted in being placed on a ventilator, and subsequently having a cardiac arrest. R64's hospitalization lasted 23 days. R34 did not have the influenza immunization offered and no declination and risks and benefits were documented. R27 did not have the influenza immunization offered and no declination and risks and benefits were documented. These examples rise to a level 2 potential for harm/isolated. This is evidenced by: The facility policy entitled, Infection Prevention and Control Program, dated 5/16/23, states, in part. 7. Influenza and Pneumococcal Immunization: a. Residents will be offered the influenza vaccine each year between October 1 and March 31, unless contraindicated or received the vaccine elsewhere during that time . c. Education will be provided to the residents and/or representatives regarding the benefits and potential side effects of the immunizations prior to offering the vaccines. d. Residents will have the opportunity to refuse the immunizations. e. Documentation will reflect the education provided and details regarding whether the resident received the immunizations . Example 2 R34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and has diagnoses that include: Acute and Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia (an absence of enough oxygen in the tissues to sustain bodily functions), sarcoidosis of lung (growth of tiny collections of inflammatory cells in the lungs causing dry coughing, shortness of breath, wheezing, and chest pain), asthma (a condition in which airways become inflamed, narrow and swell, and produce extra mucus, which makes it difficult to breathe), and pneumonia. There is no documentation that R34 was provided education on the risks and benefits of the influenza immunization or that the immunization was offered, received, or declined for 2022. Example 3 R27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has diagnoses that include: systemic lupus erythematosus (an inflammatory disease caused when the immune system attacks its own tissues, affecting the joints, skin, kidneys, blood cells, brain, heart, and lungs), heart failure, and cardiomyopathy (an acquired or hereditary disease of the heart muscle making it hard for the heart to deliver blood to the body). There is no documentation that R27 was provided education on the risks and benefits of the influenza immunization or that the immunization was offered, received, or declined. On 6/15/23 at 9:26 AM, Surveyor interviewed DON B (Director of Nursing) and asked if R34 was offered the influenza immunization in 2022. DON B indicated there was no documentation that R34 was provided education on the risks and benefits of the influenza immunization or that the immunization was offered, received, or declined for 2022. Surveyor asked DON B if there should be documentation in R34's medical record and DON B indicated yes. Surveyor asked DON B when R27 was admitted to the facility and DON B indicated 8/14/19. Surveyor asked DON B if R27 had been offered the influenza immunization and DON B indicated she would have hoped so. Surveyor asked DON B if R27 was provided education on the risks and benefits of the influenza immunization or that the immunization was offered, received, or declined. DON B indicated no. Surveyor asked DON B how often the influenza immunization should be offered to residents and DON B indicated yearly. Surveyor asked DON B if there should be documentation in R27's medical record regarding the influenza immunization and DON B indicated yes and there is not.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0554 (Tag F0554)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Example 2 On 6/13/23, at 09:10 AM, Surveyor entered R65's room and observed two medications on R65's rolling table. A bottle of ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Example 2 On 6/13/23, at 09:10 AM, Surveyor entered R65's room and observed two medications on R65's rolling table. A bottle of nyamyc (15 gram) (antifungal) and a bottle of carbamide peroxide 6.5% .5 oz (ear wax removal drops). R65 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and has diagnoses that include: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD; unspecified), acute respiratory failure (unspecified whether with hypoxia or hypercapnia), unspecified chronic bronchitis, hypothyroidism (unspecified), hyperlipidemia (unspecified), essential (primary) hypertension . R65 medical record did not include a Medication Self-Administration Assessment form. Surveyor requested R65's Medication Self-Administration Assessment form from facility staff; facility staff was unable to provide the requested documentation. R65's orders did not include the nyamyc or the carbamide peroxide or an order to self-administer the forenamed medications. On 6/13/23, at 9:20 AM, Surveyor interviewed LPN H (Licensed Practical Nurse) who indicated R65 did not have an order for the nyamyc or the carbamide peroxide and that she did not know if R65 had a Medication Self-Administration Assessment Form for these medications. LPN H indicated that the forenamed medications should not be left at bedside and should be stored in the nurse's cart. LPN H indicated she was not aware of who administers the forenamed medications and where the medications came from. On 6/13/23, at 10:55 AM, Surveyor interviewed R65 who indicated that she has been self-administrating the nyamyc (15 gram) and the carbamide peroxide. R65 indicated that she received the nyamyc from the hospital and last used 2 nights ago. R65 indicated that the carbamide peroxide was brought from her home by a friend and last used 3 nights ago. On 6/14/23, 12:00 PM, Surveyor interviewed DON B (Director of Nursing) who indicated that R65 should not have medications at bedside and R65 should have a self-administration order if self-administrating medications. DON B stated someone should have noticed them. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that all residents are clinically appropriate to self-administer medications for 2 of 2 residents (R53 and R65) of the total sample of 21 residents observed. R53 was observed to have an analgesic ointment cream in his room on his bedside table. R65 had medications located at the bedside. R65 did not have an order to self-administer medications. This is evidenced by: The facility policy entitled, Resident Self-Administration of Medication, dated 12/22, states in part: . Policy: It is the policy of this facility to support each resident's right to self-administer medication. A resident may only self-administer medications after the facility's interdisciplinary team has determined which medications may be self-administered safely . 4. The results of the interdisciplinary team assessment are recorded on the Medication Self-Administration Assessment Form, which is placed in the resident's medical record. 5. Upon notification of the use of bedside medication by the resident, the medication nurse records the self-administration on the MAR (Medication Administration Record) . 8. All nurses and aids are required to report to the charge nurse on duty any medication found at the bedside not authorized for bedside storage. Unauthorized medications are given to the charge nurse for return to the family or responsible party. Families or responsible parties are reminded of policy and procedures regarding resident self-administration when necessary. 9. Medications stored at the bedside are reordered in the same manner as other medications. 10. The nursing staff is responsible for proper rotation of bedside stock and removal of expired medications . 13. The care plan must reflect resident self-administration and storage arrangements for such medications . Example 1 R53 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple sclerosis (a condition that affects the brain and/or spinal cord). R53's Minimum Data Set (MDS), of a quarterly assessment completed on 5/5/23, shows a score of 15 on his Brief Interview for Mental Status, indicating he is cognitively intact. R53's current Physician Orders, for June 2023, do not include orders for analgesic ointment cream or to self-administer medications. R53's medical record does not contain a Self-Administration Assessment. R53's current care plan does not indicate that R53 is to self-administer any medications. On 6/13/23 at 10:36 AM, Surveyor observed a tube of an analgesic muscle rub ointment in R53's room on his bedside table during the initial screening. The Surveyor observed R53's analgesic muscle rub ointment had expired on 3/23. R53's initial interview indicated he uses the muscle rub ointment from time to time on his legs and his back due to his multiple sclerosis. On 6/14/23 at 10:08 AM, Surveyor interviewed LPN G (Licensed Practical Nurse) regarding self-administration of medications. LPN G stated the staff would check with the doctor, have the resident demonstrate if they can administer correctly, and educate the resident on how the medication is to be stored. Surveyor asked LPN G if R53 has a physician order for a muscle rub cream and she indicated he did not. LPN G further indicated that R53 does not have an order to self-medicate. At 10:50 AM, LPN G followed up with the Surveyor and noted that she had removed the medication from R53's room and the medication was almost empty. On 6/14/23 at 12:02 PM, Surveyor interviewed DON B (Director of Nursing) who explained the process if a resident would like to self-administer medication. DON B indicated that it was not okay for a resident to have medication at the bedside table. DON B indicated that the resident should have a self-administration order, a physician order for the medication, and the medication should not be expired.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Abuse Prevention Policies (Tag F0607)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview and record review, the facility did not implement their written policy which includes completing background checks for 3 of 8 employees. The facility did not implement their written...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not implement their written policy which includes completing background checks for 3 of 8 employees. The facility did not implement their written policy which includes completing reference checks for 8 of 8 employees reviewed. CNA P (Certified Nursing Assistant), CNA S, and Dietary Aide V's personnel files did not contain Background Information Disclosure (BID) checks and reference checks. CNA O, CNA Q, CNA R, RN T (Registered Nurse), and LPN U's (Licensed Practical Nurse) personnel file did not contain reference checks. Evidenced by: The facility policy, Background Investigation, dated 12/22, states, in part; Policy: Job reference checks, drug screenings, licensure verifications and criminal conviction record checks are conducted on all personnel making application for employment with this company Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1. The Human Resource department will conduct all applicable background investigation(s) on each individual making application for employment with this company and on any current employee if such background investigation is appropriate for position for which the individual has applied. For example, if an employee applies for a job position that requires driving, an investigation of the employee's driving record will be conducted. On 6/13/23, Surveyor reviewed eight personnel files. 1) CNA P's date of hire was 12/7/22. CNA P's personnel file did not contain evidence of a BID form completed. CNA P's personnel file did not contain reference checks. 2) CNA S's date of hire was 8/25/22. CNA S's personnel file did not contain evidence of a BID form completed. CNA S's personnel file did not contain reference checks. 3) Dietary Aide V's date of hire was 2/1/23. Dietary Aide V's personnel file did not contain evidence of a BID form completed. Dietary Aide V's personnel file did not contain reference checks. 4) CNA O's date of hire was 12/15/15. CNA O's personnel file did not contain reference checks. 5) CNA Q's date of hire was 3/8/23. CNA Q's personnel file did not contain reference checks. 6) CNA R's date of hire was 9/16/08. CNA R's personnel file did not contain reference checks. 7) RN T's date of hire was 10/6/15. RN T's personnel file did not contain reference checks. 8) LPN U's date of hire was 6/6/16. LPN U's personnel file did not contain reference checks. On 6/13/23 at 3:40 PM, Business Office Manager F indicated he has also been acting as Human Resources Manager since last July. Business Office Manager F indicated he does not have the education for HR but has been acting in both positions. Business Office Manager F indicated he has not been completing reference checks and he knows per policy he should be completing them. Business Office Manager F indicated in the past they had not been running BID checks but moving forward they have been. Business Office Manager F indicated they are going to be running an audit tomorrow and get all staff corrected.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility did not report an alleged violation of abuse to the State Survey Agency for 1...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility did not report an alleged violation of abuse to the State Survey Agency for 1 of 21 sampled residents (R38). R38 alleged he was told by a staff member you can get f****d and the facility did not report this to the State Survey Agency. This is evidenced by: The facility policy entitled, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, dated 12/22, states in part: .VII. Reporting/Response A. The facility will have written procedures that include: Reporting of all alleged violation to the Administrator, state agency . within specified timeframes: a. Immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or b. Not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury . R38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include: type 2 diabetes mellitus (a disease of inadequate control of blood levels of glucose), diabetic chronic kidney disease (a chronic kidney disease caused by diabetes), and anxiety disorder. R38's Minimum Data Set, which was a quarterly assessment completed on 5/17/23, shows a score of 15 on his Brief Interview for Mental Status, indicating he is cognitively intact. On 6/12/23 at 11:39 AM, Surveyor interviewed R38 during initial screening. R38 stated a staff member swore at him and verbally abused him. Surveyor asked R38 if he reported this incident to a staff member? R38 indicated he had informed the nurse on duty, and nobody has followed up with him with any further questions or concerns. On 6/15/23 at 2:18 PM, Surveyor interviewed CNA L (Certified Nursing Assistant) and asked her to describe any incidents with R38. CNA L indicated when she worked last Saturday evening (6/10/23), R38 jerked his arm up and she felt threatened. CNA L reported she was working with CNA K who was only in the room during the transfer to get R38 into bed and then CNA K left the room. Surveyor asked CNA L if she has filled out any paperwork, statements, spoke with DON B (Director of Nursing), or had any phone conversations regarding the incident and CNA L replied no. CNA L indicated she was working with LPN J (Licensed Practical Nurse) who informed her later in the evening LPN J informed DON B. On 6/15/23 at 2:20 PM, Surveyor interviewed LPN J and asked to describe the incident on 6/10/23 with R38. LPN J indicated CNA L and CNA K were putting R38 to bed while LPN J was in the same hallway passing medication. LPN J indicated she saw CNA L come out of R38's room tearful and was informed by CNA L that R38 put his arm up as if to strike CNA L. LPN J then reported going into R38's room and was informed by R38 that CNA L called R38 mother f*****r and then CNA L walked out. Surveyor asked LPN J if any paperwork was filled out, she indicated no. LPN J indicated the only time she spoke with DON B was that night and instructed her to ask questions to the other CNA and to keep CNA L out of R38's room. On 6/15/23 at 2:30 PM, Surveyor interviewed CNA K and asked to describe the incident on 6/10/23 with R38. CNA K indicated she and CNA L helped prepare R38 for bed and used the the Hoyer lift to transfer R38. CNA K further indicated she then left the room to answer call lights while CNA L was in the room doing cares. CNA K states she was not in the room the whole time with CNA L. CNA K reports LPN J asked her if she heard CNA L swear at R38 and she informed LPN J that she did not hear anything. Surveyor asked CNA K if she filled out any paperwork, written statements, spoke with DON B, or completed phone interviews regarding the incident and she stated no. On 6/15/23 at 1:47 PM, Surveyor interviewed DON B. Surveyor asked DON B is she is aware of the allegation with R38 and CNA L. DON B indicated she spoke with LPN J that evening and has been investigating. Surveyor asked DON B if the allegation of verbal abuse is reportable? She indicated that verbal abuse is reportable and felt with the second person in the room as a witness it did not rise to an abuse situation, so it was not reported. Surveyor asked DON B if the allegation of verbal abuse should have been reported, she indicated yes.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Investigate Abuse (Tag F0610)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility did not have evidence that all alleged violations are thoroughly investigated...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility did not have evidence that all alleged violations are thoroughly investigated for 1 of 21 sampled residents (R38). R38 alleged he was told by a staff member you can get f****d and the facility did not conduct a thorough investigation into this allegation. This is evidenced by: The facility policy entitled, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, dated 12/22, states in part: . V. Investigation of Alleged Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation A. An immediate investigation is warranted when suspicion of abuse, neglect or exploitation, or reports of abuse, neglect or exploitation occur. B. Written procedures for investigations include: 1. Identifying staff responsible for the investigation; . 4. Identifying and interviewing all involved persons, including the alleged victim, alleged perpetrator, witnesses, and other who might have knowledge of the allegations; 5. Focusing the investigation on determining if abuse, neglect, exploitation, and/or mistreatment has occurred, the extent, and cause; and 6. Providing complete and thorough documentation of the investigation . R38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including: type 2 diabetes mellitus (a disease of inadequate control of blood levels of glucose), diabetic chronic kidney disease (a chronic kidney disease caused by diabetes), and anxiety disorder. R38's Minimum Data Set, of a quarterly assessment completed on 5/17/23, shows a score of 15 on his Brief Interview for Mental Status, indicating he is cognitively intact. R38's progress notes and behavior notes reviewed and no evidence of documentation of R38's allegation. Facility Grievance log reviewed and no evidence of documentation of R38's allegation. On 6/12/23 at 11:39 AM, Surveyor interviewed R38 during initial screening. Surveyor asked R38 if he reported being sworn at by staff, he indicated he had informed the nurse on duty, and nobody has followed up with him. On 6/15/23 at 7:51 AM, Surveyor asked DON B (Director of Nursing) for any investigations regarding R38. DON B stated they did not have any. On 6/15/23 at 2:18 PM, Surveyor interviewed CNA L (Certified Nursing Assistant) and asked to describe any incidents with R38. CNA L indicated when she worked last Saturday evening (6/10/22), R38 jerked his arm up and she felt threatened. CNA L reported she was working with CNA K who was only in the room during the transfer to get R38 into bed and then left the room. Surveyor asked CNA L if she has filled out any paperwork, statements, spoke with DON B (Director of Nursing), or any phone conversations regarding the incident, CNA L replied no. CNA L indicated she was working with LPN J (Licensed Practical Nurse) who informed her later in the evening that LPN J informed DON B regarding the allegation. On 6/15/23 at 2:20 PM, Surveyor interviewed LPN J and asked to describe the incident on 6/10/23 with R38. LPN J indicated CNA L and CNA K were putting R38 to bed while LPN J was in the same hallway passing medication. LPN J indicated she had seen CNA L come out of R38's room tearful and was informed by CNA L that R38 put his arm up as if to strike CNA L. LPN J then reported going into R38's room and was informed by R38 that CNA L called R38 mother f****r and then CNA L walked out. Surveyor asked LPN J if any paperwork was filled out, she indicated no. LPN J indicated the only time she spoke with DON B was that night and instructed her to ask questions to the other CNA and to keep CNA L out of R38's room. On 6/15/23 at 2:30 PM, Surveyor interviewed CNA K and asked to describe the incident on 6/10/23 with R38. CNA K indicated she and CNA L helped prepare R38 to bed with the Hoyer lift. CNA K further indicated she had then left the room to answer call lights while CNA L was in the room doing cares. CNA K states she was not in the room the whole time with CNA L. CNA K reports LPN J asked her if she heard CNA L swear at R38 and informed LPN J that she did not hear anything. Surveyor asked CNA K if she filled out any paperwork, statements, spoke with DON B, or phone interviews and she stated no. On 6/16/23 at 11:21 AM, Surveyor interviewed DON B. Surveyor asked DON B if she has any investigations regarding R38. DON B indicated she started an investigation on Saturday night (6/10/23). Surveyor asked DON B to describe what had occurred, LPN J called DON B and was informed R38 was sworn at by CNA L. LPN J interviewed CNA L and CNA K. DON B provided 2 witness investigation statements of LPN J's interviews from CNA L and CNA K. The witness investigation statement notes at the bottom under signature of the recorder, talked on phone with LPN J regarding issue. Note: Surveyor asked DON B for copies of the resident interviews and was not provided prior to exit. The facility schedule shows there was one other CNA on the PM shift and 2 nurses that the facility could not provide documentation of being interviewed in relation to this allegation. There is no evidence of other staff being interviewed. On 6/15/23 at 1:47 PM, Surveyor interviewed DON B. DON B indicated she spoke with LPN J that evening and has been investigating. Surveyor asked DON B if this investigation is thorough, DON B indicated they have talked with other residents to see if they have heard any other swearing. Surveyor asked DON B if she has talked with R38, she indicated she had on 6/12/23 before the 9:00 AM meeting. Surveyor asked DON B if there is documentation to support the talk of the allegation with R38, she indicated there is no documentation. The facility has not completed a thorough investigation into R38's allegation of verbal abuse. R38 states DON B had not spoken to him regarding the allegation, and there was no evidence of staff witness statements or other residents being interviewed regarding this allegation.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure residents who are unable to carry out activities...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs) receive the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene, this has the affected 1 of 6 residents (R1) reviewed for activities of daily living out of a total sample of 21. R1 was noted to have chin hairs that were approximately 1/4- 1/2 long. Evidenced by: The facility's policy titled Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) dated 12/2022, states in part: .Care and services will be provided for the following activities of daily living: 1. Bathing, dressing, grooming and oral care .Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: .3. A resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living will receive the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene . R1 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R1 has diagnoses that include: cerebral infarction (stroke), hemiplegia and hemiparesis following unspecified cerebrovascular disease affecting left non-dominant side (paralysis/weakness of left side of the body), diabetes mellitus, encephalopathy, and osteoarthritis. R1's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] shows that R1 has a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 9 out of 15, indicating that R1 has moderate cognitive impairment. R1's MDS also states that R1 requires extensive assist of 2 staff people for bed mobility and dressing, and extensive assist of 1 staff person for personal hygiene. R1's care plan dated 5/24/23 states in part: .ADL Function: Self-Care Deficit, R1 requires staff intervention to complete ADL's [sic] R/T (related to) CVA (stroke) with hemiplegia, arthritis, requires extensive assist to perform/ complete ADL care . Goal: Resident will have ADL needs met with staff assistance and be clean, neat, odor- free .Interventions: Assist with oral cares . Report any refusals .Anticipate and meet needs . It is important to note that R1's care plan does not address shaving. On 6/13/23 at 10:05 AM, Surveyor met with R1. Surveyor observed R1 to have several chin hairs that were approximately 1/4-1/2 long. Surveyor asked R1 if the CNAs (Certified Nursing Assistant) help her shave, R1 stated I want them off. Surveyor asked R1 how having the whiskers makes her feel, R1 stated yucky. On 6/15/23 at 7:46 AM, Surveyor observed R1 to still have chin hairs. On 6/15/23 at 7:47 AM, Surveyor interviewed CNA X. Surveyor asked CNA X how often residents are shaved, CNA X stated that they are shaved when they need it, and on shower days. Surveyor asked CNA X when R1's showers are, CNA X reported that R1's showers are scheduled for Tuesday AM and Saturday PM. Surveyor and CNA X went into R1's room. Surveyor asked CNA X if appears that R1's whiskers were shaved on Tuesday, CNA X stated no. Surveyor asked CNA X if they should have been shaved, CNA X stated yes. On 6/15/23 at 7:50 AM, Surveyor interviewed DON B (Director of Nursing). Surveyor asked DON B when residents should be shaved, DON B stated that they should be checked daily for shaving needs and on shower days. Surveyor asked if it would be the same for men and women, DON B stated yes.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0698 (Tag F0698)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that residents who require dialysis receive such services cons...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that residents who require dialysis receive such services consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for 1 of 2 residents out of a sample of 21 residents (R66) resulting in R66 in missing dialysis. R66 missed dialysis on 6/10/23 due to the facility not ensuring the transport service provider was available to transport R66 to scheduled dialysis appointment. According to <Gray, K. P., [NAME], D., & [NAME], S. M. (2017). In-center hemodialysis absenteeism: prevalence and association with outcomes.>Clinic Economics and Outcomes Research, Volume 9, 307-315. https://doi.org/10.2147/ceor.s136577 One absence due to a non-medical reason is associated with a 40 percent greater risk of hospitalization and a more than double risk of mortality in the subsequent 30 days. This is evidenced by: The facility policy, entitled Hemodialysis, dated 12/2022, states: This facility will provide the necessary care and treatment, consistent with professional standards of practice, physicians orders, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's goals and preferences, to meet the special medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs of residents receiving hemodialysis . 3. The facility will coordinate and collaborate with the dialysis facility to assure that: a. The resident's needs related to dialysis treatments are met . 7. The facility will assure that arrangements are made for safe transportation to and from the dialysis facility . 10. The facility will communicate with the attending physician, dialysis facility and/or nephrologist of any canceled or postponed dialysis treatments and document any responses to the changes in treatment in the medical record. The facility for rescheduling of the resident's dialysis treatment if canceled . R66 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and has diagnoses that include: malignant neoplasm of bladder (unspecified), retention of urine (unspecified), nutritional deficiency (unspecified), other abnormal glucose, hypovolemic shock, other seizures, hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease with heart failure and stage 1 through stage 4 chronic kidney disease, or unspecified chronic kidney disease . On 6/12/23 at 3:00 PM, Surveyor interviewed R66 and FM CC (Family Member). FM CC indicated that resident missed dialysis on 6/10/23 due to transportation issues. On 6/14/23 at 2:49 PM, Surveyor interviewed MR BB (Medical Records/Scheduler) who indicated that appointments are scheduled and then added to an Outlook calendar. MR BB indicated the facility provides transportation and utilizes a transportation service; the Outlook calendar includes appointments for facility and transportation service transports. MR BB indicated that R66 missed dialysis on 6/10/23. Surveyor asked MR BB why R66 missed dialysis, MR BB stated I am not sure what happened with that. (It is important to note that R66's Saturday (6/10/23, 6/17/23, 6/24/23, and 7/1/23) dialysis appointments are missing from the Outlook transportation schedule.) On 6/14/23 at 9:22 AM, Surveyor spoke with TD DD (Transportation Driver) who indicated that the transportation service provider did not provide R66 with transport on 6/10/23. TD DD indicated that he received and responded to an email sent by the facility on 6/7/23; he indicated that transportation service provider was unable to provide transport for 6/10/23 due to the short notice of the facility. On 6/7/23 at 5:01 PM, the facility emailed a request for R66's dialysis appointments to the transportation service provider. On 6/7/23 at 9:01 PM, an email was sent to the facility from the transportation service provider that states: Unfortunately we can't accommodate this trip until next week. R66 missed his dialysis appointment due to lack of transportation.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Unnecessary Medications (Tag F0759)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure medication error rates are not 5% or greater dur...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure medication error rates are not 5% or greater during medication administration. This affected 1 of 6 residents (R4) observed for medication pass. The facility medication error rate was 6.67%, for 2 errors out of 30 opportunities. R4's first medication error was administered 30 minutes late making this a timing error. The second medication error was administered without a complete physician order. The order was not found on the current Medication Administration Record (MAR) and was signed as administered under a different medication order that had been discontinued. This is evidenced by: Example 1 The facility's policy titled Medication Administration, dated 12/22, states in part: . 11. Compare medication source (bubble pack, vial, etc.) with MAR (Medication Administration Record) to verify resident name, mediation name, form, dose, route, and time . b. Administer within 60 minutes prior to or after scheduled time unless otherwise ordered by physician . R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include trigeminal neuralgia (characterized by sudden, severe, brief, and stabbing recurrent episodes of facial pain in one or more branches of the trigeminal nerve) and an encounter for palliative care. R4's Physician Orders, provided to the Surveyor on 6/14/23, states in part: Carbamazepine oral tablet 200mg (milligrams) (carbamazepine) give 200mg by mouth three times a day for trigeminal neuralgia, start date 03/07/23. R4's MAR indicates the administration times are 7:00 AM, 12:00 PM, and 4:00 PM. On 6/13/23 at 8:29 AM, Surveyor observed LPN G (Licensed Practical Nurse) prepare R4's morning medication for administration. During this observation LPN G prepared R4's Carbamazepine 200mg tablet that is scheduled for 7:00 AM. Surveyor observed LPN G administer the prepared morning medication to R4 at 8:29 AM. On 6/13/23 at 12:11 PM, Surveyor interviewed LPN H. Surveyor asked LPN H the time parameter for a scheduled medication administration time at 7:00 AM. LPN H indicated the medication can be administered anytime between 6:00 AM - 8:00 AM. On 6/15/23 at 7:40 AM, Surveyor interviewed DON B (Director of Nursing). Surveyor asked if a medication is scheduled to be administered at 7:00 AM, what is the time frame the medication should be administered. DON B indicated the medication should be administered between 6:00 AM - 8:00 AM. Surveyor asked DON B if R4's Carbamazepine should have been administered between 6:00 AM - 8:00 AM, she indicated the medication should have been administered in that time frame. Example 2 The facility's policy titled Medication Orders, dated 12/22, states in part: Policy: This facility shall use uniform guidelines for the ordering of medication. 1. Medications should be administered only upon the signed order of a person lawfully authorized to prescribe . 3. Elements of the Medication Order: a. Date and time the order is written. B. Resident's full name. c. Name of medication. d. Dosage-strength of medication is included. e. Time or frequency of administration. f. Duration or stop date . g. Route of administration. h. Type/Formulation. i. Hour of administration. j. Diagnosis or indication for use. k. PRN (as needed) orders should also specify the condition, for which they are being administered . 4. Documentation of Medication Orders: a. Each medication order should be documented with the date, time, and signature of the person receiving the order. The order should be recorded on the physician order sheet, and the Medication Administration Record . R4's Hospital Discharge Summary Medication Reconciliation dated 2/15/23, states in part: diclofenac topical (diclofenac 1.3% topical film, extended release) 1 patch(es) Topical 2 times a day . lidocaine topical (lidocaine patch) 1 patch(es) Topical every day for 14 days . R4's Physician Orders, provided to the Surveyor on 6/14/23, dated 2/15/23, states in part: Diclofenac Epolamine 1.3% PTCH (patch) (for Diclofenac Epolamine 1.3%) 1 Patch topically twice daily, handwritten remove old patch (pain). R4's Physician Telephone Orders, dated 2/15/23 states ok to follow all Hospice orders. R4's Hospice Fax Cover Sheet orders, dated 2/15/23 states Discontinue Diclofenac patch in lieu of Lidocaine (already ordered) . Note: This order was faxed to the facility and the pharmacy. The facility has initialed twice on the fax cover sheet indicating the order was received. R4's record review of MARs from 2/15/23- 6/14/23 does not provide Lidocaine 5% patch to administer. Diclofenac Epolamine 1.3% patch is listed and documented as administered during 2/15/23-6/14/23. On 6/13/23 at 8:29 AM, Surveyor observed LPN G prepare R4's morning medication administration. During this observation, LPN G prepared Lidocaine 5% patch. Surveyor observed LPN G remove a patch from R4's back and apply the prepared Lidocaine 5% patch to R4's lower back. On 6/13/23 at 3:28 PM, Surveyor interviewed Pharmacist I. Pharmacist I indicated they dispensed diclofenac epolamine 1.3% patches on 2/15/23, 3/21/23, and 6/8/23 because the facility requested a refill. Surveyor asked Pharmacist I if there was an order for Lidocaine patches, she indicated there is not an order at this time, they do not dispense the lidocaine patches as the facility has it in their house stock. Surveyor asked Pharmacist I to clarify the dosage of lidocaine patches, she indicated the lidocaine 4% is over the counter and the 5% is for a physician script order. On 6/13/23 at 3:57 PM, Surveyor interviewed LPN J. Surveyor asked LPN J if R4 has a physician order for a lidocaine patch, she reviewed the current MAR and indicated there was not an order. LPN J further indicated they were informed to use the diclofenac for now as the insurance covers it, before we were going to use up the lidocaine. On 6/14/23 at 7:30 AM, Surveyor interviewed LPN G. LPN G opened the medication cart bottom drawer and observed a box of diclofenac epolamine 1.3% patches and a clear plastic bag of lidocaine 4% patches leaning against the box of diclofenac epolamine 1.3% patches. Surveyor asked LPN G if there was an order for lidocaine patches, she stated there was not and indicated she did not think she administered the lidocaine patch. On 6/14/23 at 8:46 AM, Surveyor interviewed LPN G and provided the lidocaine order in R4's chart. Surveyor asked LPN G if the lidocaine order looked complete, she indicated no, the order would need a percent and she would call hospice or the physician for clarification. On 6/14/23 at 10:52 AM, Surveyor interviewed Hospice RN M (Hospice Registered Nurse). Surveyor asked Hospice RN M what the patch orders for R4 are. Hospice RN M indicated she only sees one patch of the lidocaine patch that reads Lidocaine patch, 1 patch daily for muscular pain. Hospice RN M further indicates that this order was not initiated through hospice as it was already an active order when R4 was admitted to hospice. Hospice RN M indicated that there was an order for both patches (lidocaine and diclofenac epolamine) and the diclofenac epolamine patch was stopped at admission when it was found R4 had orders for both patches. Hospice RN M provided a fax that was sent to the facility and the pharmacy on the day of R4's admission. Hospice RN M indicated she would expect the facility to follow the physician orders, and that R4 should have been receiving the lidocaine patch since admission on [DATE]. Surveyor asked Hospice RN M if the lidocaine order looked complete, she indicated there is not a percent on the order, so she would assume it is over the counter. Surveyor asked Hospice RN M if there would be certain times the patch would be applied and removed, she stated, normally it would be every 12 hours on and 12 hours off, I see some t's are not crossed or the i's not dotted. Surveyor asked Hospice RN M if there has been any change in patch orders since admission on [DATE], she indicated there were no new patch orders. Note: The lidocaine order does not have a percent of the strength and no times of when to apply and when to remove the lidocaine patch. The diclofenac epolamine 1.3% patch was discontinued by hospice on 2/15/23. On 6/14/23 at 12:11 PM, Surveyor interviewed DON B regarding the R4's medication. DON B indicated that she has not able to verify if the orders are double checked in the electronic record as there is no place to document the verification. Surveyor provided the lidocaine order to DON B and asked if the order was complete. DON B indicated the strength was missing and the times of rotation for the lidocaine order. DON B reviewed the hospice order to discontinue the diclofenac epolamine and continue lidocaine. DON B was not able to recognize one of the signatures for verification and indicates she does not know how these 2 patches were mixed up. Surveyor asked DON B if this would be a medication error. DON B agreed this would be an error.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Antibiotic Stewardship (Tag F0881)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure an antibiotic stewardship program that includes antibiotic use...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure an antibiotic stewardship program that includes antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor antibiotic use was in place for 1 of 21 residents (R47) and 4 of 5 supplemental residents (R14, R28, R26, & R19). R47 was treated with antibiotics for a urinalysis culture and sensitivity (UA & C/S) that was not susceptible to the bacteria. R14 was treated with antibiotics for UA & C/S without documentation of a sensitivity report. R28 was treated with antibiotics for UA & C/S without meeting McGeers criteria. R28 had no signs and symptoms (s/sx.) of a urinary tract infection (UTI). R26 was treated with antibiotics for UA & C/S that was not susceptible to the bacteria. R19 was treated with antibiotics for UA & C/S without documentation of a sensitivity report. This is evidenced by: The facility policy, entitled Antibiotic Stewardship Program, dated 12/22, states, in part: . Policy: It is the policy of this facility to implement an Antibiotic Stewardship Program as part of the facility's overall infection prevention and control program. The purpose of the program is to optimize the treatment of infections while reducing the adverse events associated with antibiotic use. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: . b. Director of Nursing- establish standards for nursing staff to assess, monitor and communicate changes in a resident's condition that could impact the need for antibiotics, use their influence as nurse leaders to help ensure antibiotics are prescribed only when appropriate . 2. The Antibiotic Stewardship Program leaders utilize existing resources to support antibiotic stewards' efforts by working with the following partners: a. Infection Preventionist- utilizes expertise and data to inform strategies to improve antibiotic use to include tracking of antibiotic starts, monitoring adherence to evidence-based published criteria during the evaluation and management of treated infections, and reviewing antibiotic resistance patterns . b. Consultant Laboratory- developing a process for alerting the facility if certain antibiotic-resistant organisms are identified, providing education for nursing home staff on the differences in diagnostic tests available for detecting various infectious pathogens, and creating a summary report of antibiotic susceptibility patterns from organisms isolated in cultures . 4. The program includes antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor antibiotic use. a. Antibiotic use protocols: i. Nursing staff shall assess residents who are suspected to have an infection and notify the physician. ii. Laboratory testing shall be in accordance with current standards of practice. iii. The facility uses the (Center of Disease Control's NHSN (National Healthcare Safety Network) Surveillance Definitions, updated McGeer criteria, or other surveillance tool) to define infections . b. Monitoring antibiotic use: i. Monitor response to antibiotics, and laboratory results when available, to determine if the antibiotic is still indicated or adjustments should be made . 5. Nursing will monitor the initiation of antibiotics on residents and conduct an antibiotic time-out within 48-72 of antibiotic therapy to monitor response to the antibiotic and review laboratory results and will consult with the practitioner to determine if the antibiotic is to continue or if adjustments need to be made based on the findings . 8. each attending physician shall be provided feedback on his/her antibiotic use data in the form of a written report . to improve prescribing practices and resident outcomes, Feedback may include: a. Information from medical record reviews for new antibiotic starts to determine whether the resident had signs or symptoms of an infection. b. Laboratory tests ordered and the results. c. Order documentation including the indication for use, dosage, and duration. d. Clinical justification for the use of an antibiotic beyond the initial duration ordered such as a review of laboratory reports/cultures in order to determine if the antibiotic remains indicated or if adjustments to therapy should be made . The facility policy, entitled Infection Surveillance, dated 5/16/23, states, in part: . Policy: A system of infection surveillance serves as a core activity of the facility's infection prevention and control program. Its purpose is to identify infections and to monitor adherence to recommended infection prevention and control practices in order to reduce infections and prevent the spread of infections . Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: . 2. The RNs (registered nurses) and LPNs (licensed practical nurses) participate in surveillance through assessment of residents and reporting changes in condition to the resident's physicians . Examples of notification triggers include, but are not limited to: a. Resident develops signs and symptoms of infection. b. A resident started on an antibiotic. c. A microbiology test is ordered. d. A resident is placed on isolation . e. Microbiology test results show drug resistance . 4. The Center of Disease Control's NHSN Long Term Care Criteria, updated McGeer criteria or other nationally- recognized surveillance criteria will be used to define infections . The following months had the following concerns on the line list: April: R47 met criteria on McGeers for UA & C/S. R47 was treated with Zyvox (antibiotic). Zyvox was not on the antibiotic susceptibility list to treat the identified organism, Proteus [NAME] (bacteria). The facility could not provide documentation the physician had been notified and R47 remained on the Zyvox. R14 met criteria on McGeers for UA & C/S. R14 was treated with Cefuroxime (antibiotic). The facility could not provide documentation that a sensitivity had been completed. R14 remained on Cefuroxime and no documentation was supplied to physician on no sensitivity report. R28 had no s/sx. of a UTI and was ordered a UA & C/S. R28 did not meet criteria to obtain an UA & C/S. R28 was treated with an antibiotic for UTI. May: R26 met criteria for a UA & C/S and was treated with Keflex for a UTI. Organism was identified as Escherichia coli isolated. The facility could not provide documentation that a sensitivity had been completed or physician was updated on no sensitivity. R19 met criteria for a UA & C/S. R26 was treated with Ceftriaxone for an UTI. Organism identified was Proteus species, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterococcus species. The facility could not provide documentation that a sensitivity had been completed or physician was updated on no sensitivity. On 6/14/23 at 3:07 PM, Surveyor interviewed DON B (Director of Nursing). Surveyor asked DON B what standards of practice the facility utilizes for infection control, and DON B indicated McGeers. Surveyor reviewed April's resident line list with DON B. Surveyor asked DON B if the Zyvox that R47 was ordered was on the antibiotic sensitivity report and DON B indicated no. Surveyor asked DON B if R47 should be treated with Zyvox if it is not sensitive to the organism, Proteus [NAME], and DON B indicated no. Surveyor asked DON B if there was documentation the physician was notified and DON B indicated it was not documented. Surveyor asked DON B if cefuroxime was ordered to treat R14's UTI and DON B indicated yes. DON B indicated the organism identified was Proteus [NAME] and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Surveyor asked DON B if there was a sensitivity report and DON B indicated the report is not in R14's medical record. Surveyor asked DON B if there should be a sensitivity report in R14's medical record and DON B indicated yes. Surveyor asked how one would know if cefuroxime was the right antibiotic to treat the identified organism without a sensitivity report and DON B indicated you wouldn't. Surveyor asked DON B if R14 should be on cefuroxime without a sensitivity report and DON B indicated no. Surveyor asked DON B if R28 had s/sx. of a UTI and DON B indicated he had no s/sx. Surveyor asked if R28 should have been ordered a UA & C/S if R28 did not meet criteria and DON B indicated no. Surveyor asked DON B if R28 should have been on an antibiotic and DON B indicated no. DON B indicated R28 had been to emergency department, and they had put R28 on the antibiotic and then R28 went to physician's office for a follow up appointment. Surveyor asked DON B if there was documentation from either and DON B could not provide any. Surveyor asked DON B if R26 was treated with Keflex for a UTI and DON B indicated yes. Surveyor asked DON B if the organism identified was Escherichia coli and DON B indicated yes. Surveyor asked if Keflex was on the antibiotic sensitivity report as susceptible to Escherichia coli and DON B indicated no. Surveyor asked if R26 should have been treated with Keflex without being susceptible and DON B indicated no, the antibiotic should not have been given without susceptibility. Surveyor asked DON B if there was documentation physician was notified of no sensitivity report and DON B indicated no. Surveyor asked DON B if there was documentation on a sensitivity report for R19 and DON B indicated no. Surveyor asked if R19 was treated with ceftriaxone for an UTI and DON B indicated yes. Surveyor asked DON B if R19 should have been treated with ceftriaxone without a sensitivity report and DON B indicated no. Surveyor asked how one would know if the antibiotics ordered for R47, R14, R26, and R19 would be the correct antibiotic for the organisms identified without a sensitivity report. DON B indicated you would not know. Surveyor asked DON B if they should have been on antibiotics then and DON B indicated no.
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that the food was stored, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Thi...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that the food was stored, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This has the potential to affect all 52 residents residing at the facility. Surveyor observed: -facility staff personal items in food preparation workstations -dirty floors in the dry storage, walk-in cooler, and walk-in freezer -dirty hood vent -undated and uncovered foods and beverages -milk served that were not on ice and not within safe zone -wet stacking Findings include: Example 1: Personal items On 6/12/23 at 10:38 AM, Surveyor observed two cell phones and a plastic container with food on the food prep workstations. Surveyor asked DS V (Dietary Staff) what was in the plastic container with food, DS V stated, that's someone's lunch, a co-worker's lunch. Surveyor asked DM D (Dietary Manager) if staff food or cell phones should be on the food prep workstations, DM D stated, no, they should not be. On 6/14/23 at 11:27 AM, Surveyor observed a drink and doughnut sitting on the food prep workstations. Surveyor interviewed DS GG (Dietary Staff) regarding the drink and doughnut and DS GG indicated the drink and doughnut belongs to staff. Example 2: Dirty floors On 6/12/23 at 10:17 AM, Surveyor observed the floor of the facility's dry food storage to be unclean with debris including noodles, pieces of tape and cardboard, a Nutri-Grain wrapper, a can of food, portion cups, lids, and crackers in the wrapper. On 6/15/23 at 8:03 AM, Surveyor interviewed DM D who indicated that the floor of dry storage, walk-in cooler, and walk in freezer needs to be swept and mopped. Example 3: Dirty vent The 2022 FDA (Food and Drug Administration) food code state in part, .3-305.11 Food Storage. (A) Except as specified in (B) and (C) of this section, FOOD shall be protected from contamination by storing the FOOD: (1) In a clean, dry location; (2) Where it is not exposed to splash, dust, or other contamination; and (3) At least 15 cm (6 inches) above the floor . On 6/12/23 at 10:20 AM, Surveyor observed the hood vents above the stove to be dust-covered with dust moving with the flow of air. Surveyor interview DM D regarding hood vents and DM D was not able to tell Surveyor when the vents were cleaned last, stating that there was potential for the dust that has gathered on the hood vents to fall into the food being prepared below. On 6/14/23 at 11:37 AM, Surveyor observed the hood vents to be dirty; dust observed moving with air flow above the stove as hamburger was being prepared directly below. On 6/15/23 at 8:05 AM, Surveyor observed the vents and noted them to be dirty. Example 4: Undated and uncovered foods and beverages, milk served that were not on ice and not within safe zone Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Food Code, 2022, includes in part: .Refrigeration Requirements Refrigeration times and temperatures to inhibit C. botulinum and L. monocytogenes must be based on laboratory inoculation study data or follow one of the ROP (Reduced oxygen packaging) methods in Section 3-502.12 which specifies the time and temperature combinations. The . package must be marked with a use-by date within either the manufacturer's labeled use-by date or as determined by the laboratory data, whichever comes first . Labeling - Use-by date The shelf life of ROP foods is based on storage temperature for a certain time and other intrinsic factors of the food (pH, aw, cured with salt and nitrite, high levels of competing organisms, organic acids, natural antibiotics or bacteriocins, salt, preservatives, etc.). Each package of food in ROP must bear a use-by date . FDA Food Code, 2022 in Section 3-302.12, states, in part: Food storage containers, identified with common name of food, except for containers holding food that can be readily and unmistakably recognized such as dry pasta, working containers holding food or food ingredients that are removed from their original packages for use in the food establishment, such as cooking oils, flour, herbs, potato flakes, salt, spices, and sugar shall be identified with the common name of the food. The facility policy, entitled Date Marking for Food Safety dated: 12/2022 states in part . Refrigerated, ready-to-eat time/temperature control for safety food (i.e., perishable food) shall be held at a temperature of 41°F or less for a maximum of 7 days . The food shall be clearly marked to indicate the date or day by which the food play shall be consumed or discarded . The marking system shall consist of a color-coded label, the day/date of opening, and the day date the item must be consumed or discarded . The facility policy, entitled Record of Food Temperatures dated: 12/2022 states in part . potentially hazardous cold food temperatures will be kept at or below 41 degrees Fahrenheit . On 6/12/23 at 10:35 AM, Surveyor observed three ready to serve cups of jello with fruit uncovered in the cooler. On 6/15/23 at 8:51 AM, Surveyor and DM D discussed uncovered food Surveyor observed in the walk-in in cooler, DM D indicated that food should be covered. On 6/15/23 at 7:42 AM, Surveyor observed a Ziplock bag of undated mixed bread buns. Surveyor interviewed DS GG who indicated that the buns should be dated. On 6/12/23 at 10:32 AM, Surveyor toured the walk-in cooler. Surveyor observed a tray with 12 ready to serve fruit cocktail cups wrapped in saran wrap dated 6/1 and 7 juice pitchers with no date. On 6/15/23 at 8:51 AM, Surveyor and DM D observed and discussed ready to eat pineapple being stored in an undated plastic container, DM D indicated that the container should be dated. Surveyor discussed the fruit cocktail and pineapple juice DM G stated the fruit cocktail needs to be thrown out and the juice should be dated. On 6/12/23 at 9:56 AM, Surveyor observed 3 beverage carts that did not have beverages placed on ice. The State Operations Manual (SOM) states in part, .Biological Contamination - are pathogenic bacteria, viruses, toxins, and spores that contaminate food. The two most common types of disease producing organisms are bacteria and viruses. Parasites may also contaminate food but are less common. Factors which may influence the growth of bacteria may include but are not limited to: Hazardous nature of the food. Although almost any food can be contaminated, certain foods are considered more hazardous than others and are called potentially hazardous foods (PHF) or Time/Temperature Controlled for Safety (TCS) food. Examples of PHF/TCS foods include ground beef, poultry, chicken, seafood (fish or shellfish), cut melon, unpasteurized eggs, milk, yogurt, and cottage cheese; .Time and temperature control of the food. Time in conjunction with temperature controls is critical. The longer food remains in the danger zone, the greater the risks for growth of harmful pathogens. Bacteria multiply rapidly in a moist environment in the danger zone. Freezing does not kill bacteria. Rapid death of most bacteria occurs at 165 degrees F or above . On 6/12/23 at 10:02 AM, Surveyor and DM D discussed the dating of the beverages. (It is important to note, both received on date and opened on dates are marked on beverage containers with black marker, the dates do not specify dates as opened on or received on.) DM D indicated that of the beverages on the drink cart labeled Needle/Birch, the thickened strawberry kiwi juice, milk, thickened apple juice, and thickened milk did not have open dates and were not on ice. DM D indicated that the second beverage cart had beverage containers sitting directly on the cart and not on ice; of the containers the Silk, thickened apple, orange, apple, and cranberry juices did not have open dates. DM D indicated that the milk was opened on 6/5/23. DM D indicated that the third beverage cart did not have beverage containers on ice, and of the containers, the thickened apple orange, juice 1, and juice 2, and Silk did not have open dates. DM D indicated that the milk was opened on 6/5/23. DM D indicated that there was no open on date on the thickened milk, Surveyor asked DM D to take the temperature of the thickened milk. DM D took the temperature of the thickened milk and indicated the thickened milk temperature to be 85°F. Surveyor ask DM D if the thickened milk was in the safe zone, DM D was unable to provide an answer. DM D indicated that beverages should be kept on ice. On 6/12/23 at 10:38 AM, Surveyor observed the forementioned beverages out on the beverage carts and not on ice. FDA Food Code, 2022, includes in part: .3-501.16 Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food, Hot and Cold Holding. Bacterial growth and/or toxin production can occur if time/temperature control for safety food remains in the temperature Danger Zone of 5°C to 57°C (41°F to 135°F) too long . On 6/12/23 at 12:40 PM, Surveyor interviewed DS FF who indicated that the beverages being served in the dining room do not need to be placed on ice or labeled with an opened date. Surveyor asked DS FF to take the temperature of the milk. DS FF took the temperature of the milk and indicated the milk temperature to be 53.3°F. Surveyor ask DS FF if the thickened milk was in the safe zone, DS FF was unable to provide an answer. On 6/13/23 at 8:05 AM, Surveyor observed the beverages on the drink cart being passed in the dining room were not on ice. On 6/15/23 at 8:03 AM, Surveyor asked DM D how long the milk is good for, DM D stated, good until the due (expiration) date. On 6/12/23 at 10:40 AM, Surveyor reviewed the temperature logs for the walk-in cooler and walk-in freezer to be missing temperatures for the morning on 6/7/23, 6/8/23, 6/9/23, and 6/10/23. Surveyor requested a copy of the temperature logs for the cooler and freezer from DM D. On 6/12/23 at 10:57 AM, Surveyor observed DS V writing on the temperature logs for the walk-in cooler and walk-in freezer. Surveyor asked DS V what he wrote on the logs, DS V indicated that he wrote the temps on the logs for the AM on 6/7/23, 6/8/23, 6/9/23, and 6/10/23. Surveyor reviewed the logs and observed the temps for 6/7/23, 6/8/23, 6/9/23, and 6/10/23 were filled in, with an empty log box for the PM on 6/11/23. On 6/12/23 at 11:02 AM, Surveyor asked DS EE to take the temperature of the milk that Surveyor observed to be sitting in a bin without ice. DS EE took the temperature of the milk, and indicated the milk temperature to be 55°F. Example 5: Wet stacking The FDA Food Code 2022 documents at section 4-901.11 Equipment and Utensils, Air-Drying Required. After cleaning and SANITIZING, EQUIPMENT and UTENSILS: (A) Shall be air-dried or used after adequate draining as specified in the first paragraph of 40 CFR 180.940 Tolerance exemptions for active and inert ingredients for use in antimicrobial formulations (food-contact surface SANITIZING solutions), before contact with FOOD . On 6/14/23 at 11:41 AM, Surveyor observed wet stacking (stacking dishes while they are still wet) plastic plate lids. On 6/14/23 at 12:02 PM, during kitchen tray line observation, DM D and Surveyor made observation of condensation and dripping water from plastic lids. DS GG observed serving food and serving and DS HH placing wet stacked plate covers over the food on residents' plates. DM D indicated that dishes should be completely dry before using so sanitation process is complete.
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility has not established and maintained an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable en...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility has not established and maintained an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. This has the potential to affect the census of 52 residents. The duct work over the top of a folding table was observed to be leaking onto the table while the laundry aide was folding clean linens on the table. This is evidenced by: The facility policy entitled Laundry, dated 12/22, states in part: . Policy: The facility launders linens and clothing in accordance with current CDC (Centers for Disease Control) guidelines to prevent transmission of pathogens . The facility policy, entitled Infection Prevention and Control Program, dated 6/16/23, states, in part: . Policy: This facility has established and maintains an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections as per accepted national standards and guidelines . 4. Standard Precautions: e. Environmental cleaning and disinfection shall be performed according to facility policy. All staff have responsibilities related to the cleanliness of the facility, and are to report problems outside of their scope to the appropriate department . 12. Linens: a. Laundry and direct care staff shall handle, store, process, and transport linens to prevent the spread of infection . On 6/13/23 at 3:14 PM, Surveyor observed duct work over top of a folding table in the facility's laundry room. Surveyor observed water/condensation dripping onto a folding table and floor from the duct work. Surveyor observed clean laundry on the folding table along with visibly soiled and wet linen that was placed on the table and under the table to catch the dripping condensation/water. On 6/15/23 at 10:35 AM, Surveyor observed LA N (Laundry Aide) folding clean linens on the folding table and under the dripping duct work. Surveyors observed piles of folded clean linens on the folding table along with a visibly wet washcloth in between the clean piles of folded linens catching water/condensation dripping onto it. Surveyor observed two folded bath sheets on each side of the folding table on the floor. Surveyor asked LA N what the folded bath sheets on the floor were for and LA N indicated to prevent her from slipping on the floor. Surveyor asked LA N what the folded washcloth was for on the folding table between the piles of clean folded linens. LA N indicated to catch the drip coming from the air conditioning unit above the folding table. On 6/15/23 at 10:40 AM, Surveyor interviewed NHA A (Nursing Home Administrator) and MT W (Maintenance). Surveyor took NHA A and MT W to laundry room. Surveyor asked NHA A and MT W if they were aware of the leaking duct work over the folding table; both indicated no. Surveyor informed NHA A and MT W that LA N had indicated she was using a washcloth to catch dripping water/condensation from duct work. Surveyor asked NHA A if clean linen should be folded on the table when there is a drip leaking onto the table. NHA A indicated no, that is unsanitary. NHA A indicated they will move the folding table and remove the bath sheets off the floor and have the duct work looked at.
Dec 2022 2 deficiencies 1 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Deficiency F0692 (Tag F0692)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure Residents maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional and ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure Residents maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional and hydration status for 1 of 3 Residents (R2) reviewed for nutritional status. R2's nutritional and fluid intakes were not monitored to ensure he was meeting his estimated daily nutritional and fluid needs, resulting in 2 hospitalizations for dehydration. This is evidenced by: Facility policy titled Nutrition and Hydration Guideline dated 10/3/22, states in part, Purpose: The intent of this requirement is that the resident maintains, to the extent possible, acceptable parameters for nutritional and hydration status through: Providing nutritional and hydration care and services consistent with the nutritional comprehensive assessment. Recognizing, evaluating, and addressing the needs of every resident, including but not limited to, those at risk or already impaired nutrition and hydration .Process: Accurately and consistently assess a resident's nutritional status on admission and as needed thereafter: Identify a resident at nutritional risk and address risk factors for impaired nutritional status .Obtain weights upon admission, weekly x 4, monthly .Identify, implement, monitor, and modify interventions (as appropriate), consistent with the resident's needs, choices, preferences, goals, and current professional standards of practice, to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status. Notify the physician as appropriate in evaluating and managing causes of the resident's nutritional risk and impaired nutritional status. Identify and apply relevant approaches to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status, including fluids .Offer sufficient fluid intake to maintain proper hydration and health. Facility policy titled Notification of Change Guideline dated 10/3/22 states in part, .Requirements for notification of resident, the resident's representative, and their physician: A significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status. A significant change includes deterioration in health, mental, or psycho-social status . R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include right hip fracture with repair, hemiplegia, and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction (stroke) affecting the left side, Major Depressive Disorder, and hypertension. R2's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] states that R2 has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 3 out of 15, indicating that R2 is severely cognitively impaired. R2 requires extensive 2 person assist for bed mobility and is independent with eating, requiring setup help only. R2's Physician Orders state: Daily weight upon admission x 3 days, then weekly x 4 weeks, then monthly. R2 also had an order dated 11/3/22 for Ensure Clear with meals, changed to Ensure Regular with meals on 11/10/22. There is no documentation showing that R2 received the Ensure or how much he consumed. R2's weights were documented as follows: 11/2/22: 147.2 lbs. (pounds). 11/7/22: 156 lbs. 11/18/22: 130.2 lbs. 11/19/22: 131.3 lbs. 11/20/22: 130.0 lbs. 11/21/22: 129.6 lbs. 11/28/22: 129.0 lbs. It is important to note that the facility did not complete daily weights for the first 3 days after admission (11/3 and 11/4), nor did they obtain a re-weigh when documentation showed that R2 had gained 9 lbs. Based on the documented weights, R2 had lost 26 lbs. from 11/7/22 to 11/18/22. Additionally, facility staff only entered the weights from 11/2/22 and 11/18/22 into the Electronic Health Record (EHR), the others were documented on the paper Medication Administration Record (MAR). There is no documentation indicating that the Physician was updated on R2's significant weight loss. R2's meal intake documentation is as follows: 11/2: RU (Resident Unavailable) 11/3: no documentation 11/4: 2 (51-75%), 1 (26-50%), no documentation for supper 11/5: no documentation 11/6: no documentation 11/7: no documentation 11/8: 3 (76-100%), 3, no documentation for supper 11/9: RR (Resident Refused), RR, 2 11/10: RR, 2, no documentation for supper 11/11: 0 (0-25%), 0, 0 (R2 Tested positive for Covid-19) 11/12: 0, 2, no documentation for supper 11/13: 0, 0, 0 11/14: 3, 0, 0 11/15: 2, 2, no documentation for supper 11/16: 3, RU, RU (hospital) 11/17: in hospital 11/18: no documentation- R2 returned from the hospital at 4:15 PM 11/19: 0, 0, RR 11/20: 0, RR, 0 11/21: 0, 1, RU 11/22: 0, 3, 0 11/23: 3, no documentation for lunch, 0 11/24: 0, RR, no documentation for supper 11/25: 0, 1, 0 11/26: 0, 0, 0 11/27: 0, RR, RR 11/28: 0, 0, 1 11/29: 2, 1, no documentation for supper 11/30: RR, 1, RR R2's fluid intake (in milliliters) documentation (by shift) is as follows: 11/2: AM: NA (Not applicable) PM: RU (Resident unavailable) NOC: no documentation 11/3: AM: no documentation PM: no documentation NOC: 0 11/4: AM: 300 PM: no documentation NOC: no documentation 11/5: AM: 120 PM: no documentation NOC: 0 11/6: AM: no documentation PM: 120 NOC: NA (Not Applicable) 11/7: AM: no documentation PM: no documentation NOC: NA 11/8: AM: 480 PM: no documentation NOC: 120 11/9: AM: 240 PM: no documentation NOC: 120 11/10: AM: 120 PM: no documentation NOC: 120 11/11: AM: 50 PM: 250 NOC: no documentation (R2 Tested positive for Covid-19) 11/12: AM: 600 PM: 240 NOC: 0 11/13: AM:240 PM: 240 NOC: 240 11/14: AM:600 PM: 120 NOC: 150 11/15: AM: 360 PM: no documentation NOC: 200 11/16: AM:240 PM: RU NOC:120 11/17: in hospital 11/18: AM: no documentation PM: no documentation NOC: RU 11/19: AM:120 PM:0 NOC: 200 11/20: AM:480 PM:0 NOC: no documentation 11/21: AM: 120 PM:240 NOC: 0 11/22: AM: 600 PM: 480 NOC: 0 11/23: AM: 240 PM: 360 NOC: NA 11/24: AM: 500 PM: no documentation NOC: 0 11/25: AM: 480 PM: 720 NOC: no documentation 11/26: AM: 480 PM: 480 NOC: 200 11/27: AM: 240 PM: 240 NOC: 200 11/28: AM: 120 PM: 120 NOC: 200 11/29: AM: 240 PM: 120 NOC: 0 11/30: AM: 200 PM: 120 NOC: 120 Surveyor reviewed the Nurse's Notes, and there is no documentation stating that the Physician was updated regarding R2's poor appetite or poor fluid intake. Facility staff did not total daily intakes to ensure that R2 was receiving an adequate amount of fluids. On 11/11/22, R2 was positive for Covid-19. On 11/16/22, R2 had an unwitnessed fall and was sent to the emergency department. The hospital's History and Physical (H&P) states in part, On exam, frail elderly male with right sided weakness and expressive aphasia, dry mucous membrane noted. Patient admitted for UTI (Urinary Tract Infection) and AKI (Acute Kidney Injury) in setting of dehydration and recent COVID-19 infection. Plan: continue gentle hydration . Abnormal lab values include Sodium 147 (H), BUN (Blood Urea Nitrogen) 32 (H). R2 received IV (Intravenous) fluids. R2's Discharge MDS dated [DATE] states that R2 now requires supervision - oversight, encouragement or cueing with eating. R2 returned to the facility on [DATE]. Facility did not complete a dehydration assessment on R2. R2's Nutrition Risk Care Plan dated 11/27/22 states in part, At nutritional risk r/t (related to): Consumes <75%, weight loss - down 17 lbs. x 2 weeks. Goal: Weight will remain stable 130 lbs., Resident will be free of dehydration AEB (As Evidenced By) good skin turgor, labs, etc., Resident will meet 75-100% est (estimated) needs. Interventions: Provide diet as ordered .honor food preferences .supplements as ordered: TID (Three Times a Day) Ensure, monitor weights: as ordered, monitor for signs of dehydration. R2's Nutritional assessment dated [DATE] states in part, .Needs staff to cut up food- indicated on meal ticket. Usually requires supervision- at times may need assistance. Est. needs: 1700-2070 kcal/day, 1480-1780 ml/day. Est. needs increased d/t (due to) low BMI (Body Mass Index) and R (Right) hip fx (fracture) with surgical site .No new recommendations at this time. Reweight requested . It is important to note that the facility's Registered Dietician (RD) did not see R2 until R2 had been at the facility for 25 days. R2 went from being independent with set-up to now needing staff to cut up food, requiring staff supervision, and needing assist at times. R2's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] states that R2 now requires extensive 1 person physical assist for bed mobility, eating, and toilet use. On 12/2/22, R2 went to see his Primary Care Physician (PCP) due to making suicidal remarks and the facility's request to increase his mirtazapine (anti-depressant.) R2 was found to be hypotensive (low blood pressure) with blood pressure readings of 60/40 and 80/52. Clinic notes state that R2 was ill-appearing and pale. The Physician discussed options with family, fluids were started, and R2 was sent to the ED (Emergency Department) and was subsequently admitted to the hospital for 5 days with the diagnoses of dehydration, elevated lactic acid level, hypotension, and failure to thrive. Abnormal lab values include Hemoglobin 8.4 (L), Lactic Acid 3.9 (H), Cortisol 31.0 (H), Creatinine 1.3 (H), and Albumin 3.3 (L). (Albumin test measures the amount of protein in the clear liquid portion of the blood. Low albumin levels can be a sign of malnutrition.) On 12/13/22 at 1:52 PM, Surveyor interviewed CNA J (Certified Nursing Assistant). Surveyor asked CNA J how often residents are weighed? CNA J stated that everyone gets weighed on the 1st of the month, but new admissions are weighed 3 days straight. Surveyor asked CNA J what they do with the weights after they have obtained them? CNA J stated that they give them to the nurse, and they put them in the computer. On 12/13/22 at 1:55 PM, Surveyor interviewed LPN I (Licensed Practical Nurse). Surveyor asked LPN I what do the nurses do with the weights when the CNAs give them to them? LPN I stated that they put them in the computer or on the MAR. Surveyor asked LPN I, how are the nurses alerted to weight loss in a resident? LPN I stated by looking at it and that the computer also updates them when there is weight loss. Surveyor asked LPN I what steps she takes after noticing or being alerted to a weight loss? LPN I stated that they inform the dietician, the doctor, and the family. Surveyor asked LPN I where they would document this communication? LPN I stated in the nurse's notes. On 12/13/22 at 2:40 PM, Surveyor interviewed DON B (Director of Nursing) and ADON F (Assistant Director of Nursing.) Surveyor asked DON B what the facility's policy is for weighing new admissions? DON B stated that they are weighed on admission and then depending on the MD (Medical Doctor) orders. Surveyor asked DON B what her expectations were when a nurse notices a weight loss or gain? DON B stated that she would expect the nurse to let her and ADON F know, and he will update the dietician. Surveyor asked DON B if the MD should be updated; DON B stated yes. Surveyor asked DON B if she would expect that communication to be documented; DON B stated yes. Surveyor asked DON B if by reviewing the documentation, she could tell if the MD was updated on R2's weight loss; DON B stated no. Surveyor asked DON B if she would expect that the RD (Registered Dietician) see R2 before 11/27/22? DON B stated yes, he should have been seen when he was newly admitted . Surveyor asked DON B who is responsible for totaling daily fluid intakes? DON B stated that it is usually dietary. Surveyor asked DON B who reviews the intake totals? DON B stated that before it was dietary, but she is unsure at this time. Surveyor asked DON B if she expected the CNAs to document every day and shift; DON B stated yes. Surveyor asked DON B if staff were aware of R2's poor appetite, would she expect that R2 be weighed more frequently; DON B stated yes. Surveyor asked ADON F if at any point he updated the MD regarding R2's weight loss? ADON F stated he receives and reviews the dietary notes and then sends them to the MD. Surveyor asked ADON F if at any point during the 9 days from when the weight loss was documented, until the RD saw R2 was the MD updated? ADON F stated that he was not sure. On 12/14/22 at 8:25 AM, Surveyor interviewed RN G (Registered Nurse (MD office)). Surveyor asked RN G if they had received any updates from the facility regarding R2's poor appetite and decreased fluid intake? RN G reviewed the clinic documentation and reported that they received faxes on: 11/2 regarding admission paperwork, 11/9 requesting to change Ensure from clear to regular, 11/15 requesting an order for Mucinex and to schedule oxycodone, and 11/18 request orders for an antibiotic for UTI. RN G stated that they also received a call on 12/1 to request an increase to mirtazapine. Surveyor asked RN G if the clinic/MD was made aware the R2 had a 17-pound weight loss? RN G stated that they were not made aware of that. RN G reported to Surveyor that the MD required R2 to come into the clinic to be assessed before increasing his mirtazapine, and then was sent to the hospital for hypotension and dehydration on 12/2/22. On 12/14/22 at 9:35 AM, Surveyor interviewed RD H. Surveyor asked RD H what her timeline is for seeing new admissions? RD H stated 14 days. Surveyor asked RD H if R2 was seen within 14 days of admission? RD H stated no and that she must have been late with that one. Surveyor asked RD H if the facility updated her regarding R2's 17-pound weight loss; RD H stated no, but that she noticed it in the computer and sent an email to the ADON and DON requesting a reweigh. Surveyor asked RD H if a reweigh was completed? RD H stated that she was unsure because some are documented on paper and others are in the EHR (Electronic Health Record.) Surveyor asked RD H if she reviews daily fluid intakes? RD H stated no. Surveyor asked RD H if R2 was meeting his daily fluid intake needs? RD H stated no. Surveyor asked RD H if she knew how much of R2's Ensure he was consuming daily? RD H stated no. Surveyor asked RD H if the dietary staff was documenting how much Ensure is consumed? RD H stated no, nursing should be documenting that. On 12/14/22 at 10:04 AM, Surveyor interviewed DON B. Surveyor asked DON B how they know if a resident is receiving the Ensure if no one is documenting on it? DON B stated that it should be documented on the MAR. DON B reviewed R2's MAR and stated that it's not on there. Surveyor asked DON B how does the nurse know if the Ensure has been given? DON B stated that they would have to check with staff. Surveyor asked DON B if she would expect that to be documented; DON B stated yes. Surveyor asked DON B if they currently have a process to track how much Ensure is being consumed and therefore tracking the calories from the Ensure? DON B stated no. Surveyor asked DON B if they have a Dehydration assessment for R2; DON B stated no. R2 had weight loss due to a decline in fluid and nutritional intake, staff were not monitoring R2's weights or intakes to ensure he was meeting his estimated daily needs. R2 went from being independent to supervision to needing assist of 1 with eating within 28 days of being admitted . R2 became ill with Covid-19 which increased his daily nutritional and fluid requirement while ill. R2 was not assessed for dehydration at any time during his stay by the facility and was hospitalized two times with dehydration. R2 did not return to the facility after his 12/2/22 hospitalization.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that each resident received the needed supervisi...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that each resident received the needed supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 3 total sampled residents (R6) reviewed for falls. R6 received a bed bath on 11/19/22 with the assist of 1 Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA). R6 rolled out of bed due to R6 missing the grab bar and landed on her back onto the floor. R6 was to be a two-person assist with her bed bath, and staff only used assist of 1. This is evidenced by: The Facility's Policy and Procedure entitled Bath, Bed with a last revised date of 2/18, documents, in part: . Back: a. Instruct the resident to turn on his/her side with his/her back toward you. (Note: Be sure the side rail is up on the opposite side of the bed to prevent the resident from rolling out of bed.) . R6 is a long-term resident of the facility. R6 was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis history that indicates: Cerebrovascular Disease, Cerebral Infarction, Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following unspecified Cerebrovascular Disease affecting Left Non-Dominant Side, R6's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment on 9/15/22 indicates R6 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 indicating moderately impaired. R6's is indicated as being usually understood and usually understands others. R6's Functional Assessment: extensive assistance with one person for physical assist with bed mobility, dressing and personal hygiene. R6's transfer and toileting require total dependence assistance with two + persons for physical assistance. R6's functional limitation assessment indicates one impairment on one side in the upper and lower extremities. Devices that R6 uses are a wheelchair. The fall assessment for R6 indicates no falls since admission. R6's care plan reviewed by surveyor on 12/13/22, documents the following, in part: ADL (Activities of Daily Living)/Mobility Care Plan-Page 1 . Interventions . Assist/encourage/provide per resident preference . Bed bath, Provide 2A (2 Assist) . Care Delivery Guide . prompt her to use the right side grab bar to assist with positioning, reposition/ assist every 2 hours . (Note: this document is referred to as the Certified Nursing Assistant [NAME] that does not indicate how many staff are required to assist R6.) R6's Fall assessment dated [DATE], R6 scored a 10 indicating moderate risk for falls. R6's Fall report dated 11/19/22 state, in part: . Notes: 11/21/22 Talked with resident regarding her fall. She said that when she rolls over, she grabs the bar, but she felt that she did not grab it hard enough and rolled over the side of the bed. She said that she has not had that problem ever before. Talked with her about having two staff to help and she said that she felt she could still be a one assist. So, we will keep her as a one assist and if in the future we feel she needs to be a two assist we will change at that time. Resident will be prompted to grab the enabler bar when turning over . (R6's paper copy of the care plan in her chart indicates R6 is a 2 assist with bed baths.) On 11/19/22 R6 Nursing Note state, states in part: At 1755 (5:55 PM), this writer was on the phone with another resident's family when CNA came to desk to alert me she needed help right away. Then heard screaming from down the hall. CNA stated that resident rolled out of bed while giving her a bed bath. Resident hit head, elbow, and bottom. DON (Director of Nursing), family and doctor notified . On 11/20/22 R6 Nursing Note, states in part: Resident returned to facility at 0200 (2:00AM). Resident has ace wrap to right arm, requested Norco for pain related to fall. Neuro checks within normal limits. Sleeping comfortably and this time. Call light within reach, able to make needs known. Will continue to monitor. On 12/12/22 at 2:37 PM, Surveyor observed R6's bed does not have siderails but has 2 grab bars. On 12/13/22 at 3:56 PM, Surveyor interviewed DON B. Surveyor asked DON B if any education was provided, DON B replied she did not know. Surveyor reviewed R6's care plan from the chart with DON B, and asked DON B if R6 should have 2 staff assist with a bed bath, DON B replied yes. Surveyor asked DON B if there were 2 staff to assist with R6's bed bath, would R6 have fallen. DON B replied to Surveyor, probably not. Surveyor provided the comparison of R6's care plan from the chart and the provided care delivery guide to DON B. Surveyor asked DON B how staff would know how many staff should assist with the bed bath for R6. DON B replied to Surveyor, They contradict each other. On 12/12/22 at 4:00 PM, Surveyor observed the care plan rack in the nursing station on the wall to be empty. On 12/13/22 at 4:10 PM, Surveyor interviewed LPN E (Licensed Practical Nurse). Surveyor asked LPN E where to look for the care plan, LPN E replied in the resident's chart. Surveyor reviewed R6's care plan in R6's chart. Surveyor asked LPN E how would R6 be assisted with her bed bath. LPN E replied to Surveyor that 2 CNAs would be needed for the bed bath. On 12/14/22 at 7:23 AM, Surveyor interviewed CNA C. Surveyor asked CNA C how she would know how to care for R6 for a bed bath. CNA C reported to Surveyor that the care plans are printed out. Surveyor asked CNA C where the care plans are located, CNA C advised the wall rack in the nurses station, and she had asked to have it filled as they have been out of copies. Surveyor asked CNA C to describe the events of R6's fall. CNA C replied to Surveyor that she looked for the other girl to help and she was busy, CNA C further reported that she is aware that R6 is a 2 person assist. CNA C explained to Surveyor that R6 rolled over to reach for the grab bar and rolled off the bed onto the floor landing on her back, hitting her head. CNA C stated to Surveyor she went to obtain a nurse, 911 was called, the paramedics picked up R6 from the floor, and R6 was taken to the hospital. Surveyor asked CNA C if she was provided any education, CNA C replied she did not remember but knows that any time she is taking care of R6 she will have 2 people assist in the cares. (CNA C did not follow R6's care plan by not waiting for a 2nd staff member to come and assist her with R6's bed bath.)
Apr 2022 4 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure assessments for residents that smoke cigarettes were completed ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure assessments for residents that smoke cigarettes were completed timely for 1 of 2 sampled residents (R40) and and 2 of 2 supplemental residents (R51 and R46). R40 did not have a smoking assessment completed since 7/26/21 and R46 and R51 did not have smoking assessments completed timely. Evidenced by: The facility's Smoking Policy-Residents dated July 2017, includes: -The resident will be evaluated on admission to determine if he or she is a smoker or non-smoker. If a smoker, the evaluation will include: a. Current level of tobacco consumption; b. Method of tobacco consumption (traditional cigarettes; electronic cigarettes; pipe; etc.); c. Desire to quit smoking, if a current smoker; and d. Ability to smoke safety with or without supervision (per a completed Safe Smoking Evaluation). -The resident's ability to smoke safely will be re-evaluated quarterly, upon a significant change (physical or cognitive) and as determined by the staff. Example 1 R40 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that include wedge compression fracture of vertebra, and asthma. R40's MDS (Minimum Data Set) measures her BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) as 15, which is cognitively aware. R40 had prior admissions in the facility, from 5/5/21 to 8/1/21 and from 11/17/21 to 2/16/22. R40's smoking care plan documents she is a safe, independent smoker. R40's smoking evaluation dated 7/21/21 documents R40 as a independent smoker. Surveyor requested a current (current admission) smoking evaluation for R40. SW C (Social Worker) gave Surveyor a smoking evaluation for R40 dated 12/27/22. Surveyor gave the smoking evaluation back to SW C and requested a current smoking evaluation. SW C gave Surveyor a smoking evaluation for R40 dated 12/27/21. Surveyor asked SW C about the smoking evaluations with different dates. SW C said she created the 12/27/21 and 12/27/22 today (4/12/22), according to R40's care plan. SW C said she did not complete a smoking evaluation on 12/27/21 for R40. SW C said she frequently watched the residents while they were smoking and based her evaluations on her observations. Example 2 R51 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include: lack of coordination, macular degeneration, rheumatoid arthritis and asthma. R51's MDS measures his BIMS at 15. R51's smoking care plan documents he is a safe, independent smoker. R51's smoking evaluation dated 11/30/21 documents R51 as a independent smoker. Surveyor requested a current smoking evaluation. SW C gave Surveyor a smoking evaluation for R51 dated 3/17/22. Surveyor asked SW If there was a different place for resident smoking evaluations besides the residents medical record. SW C said all the smoking evaluations were kept in the residents medical record. The only smoking evaluation Surveyor had reviewed in R51's medical record was the smoking evaluation dated 11/30/21. SW C said she created the smoking evaluation dated 3/17/22 for R51 today (4/12/22), according to R51's care plan. SW C said she did the evaluation of R51 on 3/17/22 but had not written it down. Example 3 R46 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include: Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment. R46's MDS measures her BIMS at 15. R46's smoking care plan documents at this time is a safe, independent smoker. R46's smoking assessment dated [DATE] documents she is not a safe smoker, indicating she is unable to get out of the building safely and did not demonstrate appropriate use of an ashtray. R46's smoking assessment dated [DATE] documents she is a safe, independent smoker. This assessment is late by two months. On 4/12/22 at 10:00 AM, Surveyor spoke with DON B (Director of Nursing). DON B said that R46 has had fluctuations in her health and now she is safe to be an independent smoker. DON B said the smoking evaluations should be completed timely and since R46 had fluctuations in her health, it was important that the smoking evaluation should be completed timely. DON B said she is not sure why SW C created documents today.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not maintain a safe and sanitary environment in which food i...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not maintain a safe and sanitary environment in which food is prepared, stored, and distributed. This has a potential to affect all 49 residents who reside in the facility. Surveyor observed the facility's stovehood to have a layer of dust on the piping, vents, soffet, along the perimeter, and the back of the stove. Surveyor observed facility ice machine to have a white and brown substance on the exterior of the machine on all four sides and on the top. On the right side of the machine was shelving that stored clean dishware. The dishware was observed leaning against the white/brown calcified substance. Surveyor observed food items opened and being served to residents with no open dates. Surveyor observed the facility's meat slicer to be stored with dried meat debris on it. Surveyor observed [NAME] J microwaving residents food items without covering them. Evidenced by: Stovehood On 4/6/22 at 9:45 AM Surveyor observed the facility's stove hood to have a layer of dust on the vents, piping, the perimeter, and on the back of the stove that touches the wall. During an interview, DM E indicated there is potential for the dust to dislodge into the food being prepared directly underneath the stove hood unit. DM E also indicated MM F is responsible for cleaning the vents and the kitchen staff is responsible for cleaning the back of the stove and the perimeter. On 4/6/22 at 10:31 AM Surveyor and MM F observed the stove hood. MM F indicated the stove hood was cleaned last 11/2021, but it needs it again. MM F indicated there is potential for food to be contaminated as the dust is directly above the food preparation area. Ice Machine On 4/6/22 at 9:45 AM Surveyor observed the facility ice machine to be coated in a thick white and tan calcified substance on four sides and the top. On the right side of the ice machine was shelving holding clean stacked pitchers, plastic silverware holders, metal tubs, and other dishware. These items were leaning against the calcified substance. During the interview, DM E (Dietary Manager) indicated the items on the shelving were stored clean and should not be leaning onto the substance on ice machine. DM E also indicated it is MM F (Maintenance Man) who is responsible for the cleaning of the ice machine. On 4/6/22 at 10:31 AM Surveyor and MM F observed the ice machine. MM F indicated the ice machine was in need of cleaning and the clean dishware leaning up on it should also be cleaned. Food dating Facility policy, entitled Sanitation and Food Safety, undated, includes, in part: . opened foods shall be clearly labeled with date food item is to be discarded . On 4/12/22 at 8:10 AM Surveyor observed staff serving breakfast down the hallway. In a bin with ice, Surveyor observed a [NAME] Lactose Free milk opened with no open date, a half gallon size orange juice opened and no open date, nectar thick water opened with no open date, and a Apple Cranberry Nutritional Supplement with no thaw date. During an interview LEA G (Life Enrichment Associate), CNA H, and LPN I indicated they were unsure when these products were opened or pulled from the freezer. On 4/12/22 at 10:42 AM during an interview DM E indicated the staff are to date any food/beverage they open. Meat Slicer On 4/6/22 at 9:45 AM Surveyor observed a meat slicer with a white sheet draped over it. Surveyor asked DM E to uncover the meat slicer for an observation. DM E lifted the sheet off of the meat slicer and Surveyor observed dried meat on meat slicer. DM E indicated the meat slicer was not clean and should have been before being covered to store. Microwave Use On 4/6/22 at 9:45 AM Surveyor observed [NAME] J warming residents' foods in the microwave without covering it. During an interview, [NAME] J indicated she should cover the foods. DM E indicated [NAME] J should cover foods to avoid contamination. Meat Slacking Facility policy, entitled Thawing Frozen Food, undated, includes, in part: The only acceptable methods for thawing frozen food are in a refrigerator, at 41 degrees F or lower . submerged under running potable water at a temperature of 70 degrees F or lower for a period of time that does not allow thawed portions to rise above 41 degrees F . In a microwave oven, if food will be cooked immediately after thawing . As part of the cooking process . On 4/11/22 between 3:45 PM - 4:05 PM Surveyor observed two long tubes of hamburger and one long package of pork slacking in the facility's preparation sink. During an interview DM E indicated the meat should be in deep pans and placed in the refrigerator to thaw and not be left to thaw in the sink at room temperature.
MINOR (B)

Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact

Transfer Notice (Tag F0623)

Minor procedural issue · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Example 2 R46 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His most recent hospital stay was 3/6/22- 3/9/22. The facility did not not...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Example 2 R46 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His most recent hospital stay was 3/6/22- 3/9/22. The facility did not notify the ombudsman of this transfer. Example 3 R59 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 3/5/22, R59 went out to the hospital. His return was anticipated. The facility did not notify the ombudsman of this transfer. Example 4 R48 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 3/29/22 R48 was admitted to the hospital. The facility did not notify the ombudman of this transfer. On 4/12/22 at 7:49 AM Surveyor asked SW C if she was notifying the Ombudsman of transfers and discharges. SW C stated, I am not doing that. I didnt know I was supposed to. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to notify the Office of the State Long Term Care Ombudsman (state appointed resident advocate) of discharged residents for 1 of 18 sampled (R40) and 3 of 3 supplemental residents (R46, R48 and R59) reviewed for discharge notification. The facility has not been sending the Ombudsman a list of discharged residents. Evidenced by: The facility's Transfer or Discharge Notice policy dated December 2016 does not include notification of resident discharge should be sent to the Office of the State Long Term Care Ombudsman. Example 1 R40 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R40 was sent out to the emergency room for complaints of abdominal pain on 3/24/22. The facility did not notify the Ombudsman that R40 had been discharged . On 4/12/22 at 7:49 AM, Surveyor spoke to SW C (Social Worker). SW C said she was not aware that was something she had to do and that she has not sent a list of discharged residents to the Ombudsman.
MINOR (B)

Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact

Deficiency F0625 (Tag F0625)

Minor procedural issue · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Example 2 R46 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His most recent hospital stay was 3/6/22- 3/9/22. The facility did not pro...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Example 2 R46 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His most recent hospital stay was 3/6/22- 3/9/22. The facility did not provide a bed hold for R46. Example 3 R59 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 3/5/22, R59 went out to the hospital. His return was anticipated. The facility did not provide R59 with a bed hold. Example 4 R48 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 3/29/22 R48 was admitted to the hospital. The facility did not provide R48 with a bed hold. Based on interview and record review the facility did not at the time of discharge provide resident, family member or legal representative written notice which specifies the duration of the bed-hold policy or associated cost for 1 of 18 sampled residents (R40) and 3 of 3 supplemental residents (R46, R48 and R59) reviewed for bedhold. R40, R46, R48 and R59 were discharged to the hospital without being provided with written notice of the duration of the bed-hold information and the associated costs at time of discharge. Evidenced by: The facility's Bed-Holds and Returns policy dated March 2017 includes: -Prior to transfer, written information will be given to the residents and the resident representatives that explains in detail: a. The rights and limitations of the resident regarding bedholds; b. The reserve bed payment policy as indicated by the state plan (Medicaid residents); c. The facility per diem rate required to hold a bed (non-Medicaid residents), or to hold a bed beyond the state bed-hold period (Medicaid residents); and d. The details of the transfer (per Notice of Transfer). Example 1 R40 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R40 was sent to the emergency room with complaints of abdominal pain. On 4/12/22 at 10:30 AM, Surveyor spoke to R40. Surveyor asked R40 if she received a bed-hold notice when she went to the hospital in March 2022. R40 said she did not know what a bed-hold notice was and she did not receive any notice from the facility when she went to the hospital. On 4/12/22 at 11:00 AM, Surveyor spoke with BOM D (Business Office Manager). BOM D said he was unaware of the regulation that the facility must provide a bed-hold notice to resident, family or power of attorney when the resident is discharged to an acute care setting or therapeutic leave.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • 36% turnover. Below Wisconsin's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: 5 harm violation(s), $101,076 in fines, Payment denial on record. Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 45 deficiencies on record, including 5 serious (caused harm) violations. Ask about corrective actions taken.
  • • $101,076 in fines. Extremely high, among the most fined facilities in Wisconsin. Major compliance failures.
  • • Grade F (0/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: Trust Score of 0/100 indicates significant concerns. Thoroughly evaluate alternatives.

About This Facility

What is Beloit Center's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns BELOIT HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER an overall rating of 1 out of 5 stars, which is considered much below average nationally. Within Wisconsin, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.

How is Beloit Center Staffed?

CMS rates BELOIT HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER's staffing level at 3 out of 5 stars, which is average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 36%, compared to the Wisconsin average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.

What Have Inspectors Found at Beloit Center?

State health inspectors documented 45 deficiencies at BELOIT HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER during 2022 to 2025. These included: 5 that caused actual resident harm, 38 with potential for harm, and 2 minor or isolated issues. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.

Who Owns and Operates Beloit Center?

BELOIT HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by CHAMPION CARE, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 110 certified beds and approximately 54 residents (about 49% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in BELOIT, Wisconsin.

How Does Beloit Center Compare to Other Wisconsin Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Wisconsin, BELOIT HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER's overall rating (1 stars) is below the state average of 3.0, staff turnover (36%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (1 stars) is much below the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Beloit Center?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"

Is Beloit Center Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, BELOIT HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 1-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Wisconsin. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.

Do Nurses at Beloit Center Stick Around?

BELOIT HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER has a staff turnover rate of 36%, which is about average for Wisconsin nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.

Was Beloit Center Ever Fined?

BELOIT HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER has been fined $101,076 across 3 penalty actions. This is 3.0x the Wisconsin average of $34,090. Fines at this level are uncommon and typically indicate a pattern of serious deficiencies, repeated violations, or failure to correct problems promptly. CMS reserves penalties of this magnitude for facilities that pose significant, documented risk to resident health or safety. Families should request specific documentation of what issues led to these fines and what systemic changes have been implemented.

Is Beloit Center on Any Federal Watch List?

BELOIT HEALTH AND REHABILITATION CENTER is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.