DOVE HEALTHCARE - BLOOMER
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Dove Healthcare - Bloomer has received an impressive Trust Grade of A, indicating excellent quality and a strong recommendation for families considering this nursing home. It ranks #26 out of 321 facilities in Wisconsin, placing it in the top half of all nursing homes in the state, and #2 of 6 in Chippewa County, meaning only one local option ranks higher. The facility is improving in quality, as the number of issues reported decreased from 3 in 2024 to 2 in 2025. Staffing is a notable strength, with a perfect rating of 5 out of 5 stars and a turnover rate of 30%, which is below the state average of 47%, suggesting a stable workforce that knows the residents well. However, the facility has faced some concerns, including food preparation safety violations where staff did not follow proper sanitary procedures, and there is less RN coverage compared to 76% of Wisconsin facilities, which could impact the quality of care. Overall, while Dove Healthcare - Bloomer has solid strengths, potential residents should also be aware of these weaknesses.
- Trust Score
- A
- In Wisconsin
- #26/321
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ✓ Good
- 30% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 18 points below Wisconsin's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- $5,282 in fines. Lower than most Wisconsin facilities. Relatively clean record.
- Skilled Nurses ✓ Good
- Each resident gets 49 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than average for Wisconsin. RNs are trained to catch health problems early.
- Violations ○ Average
- 10 deficiencies on record. Average for a facility this size. Mostly minor or procedural issues.
The Good
-
5-Star Staffing Rating · Excellent nurse staffing levels
-
4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Low Staff Turnover (30%) · Staff stability means consistent care
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover is low (30%)
18 points below Wisconsin average of 48%
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, staff retention, fire safety.
The Bad
Below median ($33,413)
Minor penalties assessed
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 10 deficiencies on record
Apr 2025
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility did not prepare and distribute food in a sanitary manner. This has the potential to affect all 49 residents.
Surveyor observed [NAME] ...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(C)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Staffing Information
(Tag F0732)
Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents
Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure staff postings were accurate which has the potential to affect 49 out of 49 residents.
Review of staffing schedules and required staff...
Read full inspector narrative →
Mar 2024
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0760
(Tag F0760)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility did not ensure that residents are free of significant medication...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Example 3
On 03/13/24 at 8:27 AM, Surveyor observed Medication Aide (MA) G prep R6's medications. MA G primed the Novolog pen and then drew a total of 8 units. MA G primed the Glargine pen and then dr...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Example 3
On 03/12/24 at 12:03 PM, Surveyor observed [NAME] K grab a plate with [NAME] K's left gloved hand, and then [NAME] K grabbed buns with [NAME] K's left gloved hand. [NAME] K separated buns w...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jan 2023
5 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure each resident is treated with dignity in a manner and in an environment that promotes enhancement of his or her quality o...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, facility staff failed to ensure residents are as free of accident hazards as possible for ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0811
(Tag F0811)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure staff had successfully completed a State-approved training course that meets requirements before feeding residents. This ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation and interview, the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0883
(Tag F0883)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and record review, the facility did not offer pneumococcal immunization as required for 1 resident (R8) of 5...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Grade A (91/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Wisconsin.
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • 30% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 18 points below Wisconsin's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
- • No significant concerns identified. This facility shows no red flags across CMS ratings, staff turnover, or federal penalties.
About This Facility
What is Dove Healthcare - Bloomer's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns DOVE HEALTHCARE - BLOOMER an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Wisconsin, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Dove Healthcare - Bloomer Staffed?
CMS rates DOVE HEALTHCARE - BLOOMER's staffing level at 5 out of 5 stars, which is much above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 30%, compared to the Wisconsin average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Dove Healthcare - Bloomer?
State health inspectors documented 10 deficiencies at DOVE HEALTHCARE - BLOOMER during 2023 to 2025. These included: 9 with potential for harm and 1 minor or isolated issues.
Who Owns and Operates Dove Healthcare - Bloomer?
DOVE HEALTHCARE - BLOOMER is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by DOVE HEALTHCARE, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 50 certified beds and approximately 47 residents (about 94% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in BLOOMER, Wisconsin.
How Does Dove Healthcare - Bloomer Compare to Other Wisconsin Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Wisconsin, DOVE HEALTHCARE - BLOOMER's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 3.0, staff turnover (30%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Dove Healthcare - Bloomer?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is Dove Healthcare - Bloomer Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, DOVE HEALTHCARE - BLOOMER has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Wisconsin. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Dove Healthcare - Bloomer Stick Around?
Staff at DOVE HEALTHCARE - BLOOMER tend to stick around. With a turnover rate of 30%, the facility is 16 percentage points below the Wisconsin average of 46%. Low turnover is a positive sign. It means caregivers have time to learn each resident's needs, medications, and personal preferences. Consistent staff also notice subtle changes in a resident's condition more quickly. Registered Nurse turnover is also low at 20%, meaning experienced RNs are available to handle complex medical needs.
Was Dove Healthcare - Bloomer Ever Fined?
DOVE HEALTHCARE - BLOOMER has been fined $5,282 across 1 penalty action. This is below the Wisconsin average of $33,132. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Dove Healthcare - Bloomer on Any Federal Watch List?
DOVE HEALTHCARE - BLOOMER is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.