ELROY HEALTH SERVICES

307 ROYALL AVE, ELROY, WI 53929 (608) 462-8491
For profit - Limited Liability company 80 Beds NORTH SHORE HEALTHCARE Data: November 2025 1 Immediate Jeopardy citation
Trust Grade
16/100
#275 of 321 in WI
Last Inspection: March 2025

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Elroy Health Services has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns and a poor overall standing. With a state rank of #275 out of 321 in Wisconsin, they fall in the bottom half of facilities, and they are the lowest-ranked option in Juneau County. The facility's trend appears stable, with 15 issues reported consistently over the past two years, but the overall situation is troubling. Staffing is rated average with a turnover of 44%, which is slightly better than the state average, but the facility has faced fines totaling $9,750, suggesting ongoing compliance issues. Specific incidents of concern include a critical failure to prevent pressure injuries in residents, where one resident developed severe wounds due to inadequate care and documentation. Additionally, a serious incident involved a resident who experienced a fall and a subsequent delay in treatment for a fracture because necessary x-rays were not completed on time. Another serious issue highlighted that a resident fell after the facility failed to implement effective fall prevention measures, illustrating lapses in care and safety protocols. While there are some strengths in staffing stability, the multiple serious deficiencies raise red flags for families considering this nursing home.

Trust Score
F
16/100
In Wisconsin
#275/321
Bottom 15%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Holding Steady
15 → 15 violations
Staff Stability
○ Average
44% turnover. Near Wisconsin's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
Penalties
✓ Good
$9,750 in fines. Lower than most Wisconsin facilities. Relatively clean record.
Skilled Nurses
✓ Good
Each resident gets 52 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than average for Wisconsin. RNs are trained to catch health problems early.
Violations
⚠ Watch
39 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Overall Rating
★★★☆☆
3.0
Staff Levels
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Care Quality
★☆☆☆☆
1.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2024: 15 issues
2025: 15 issues

The Good

  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record
  • Staff turnover below average (44%)

    4 points below Wisconsin average of 48%

Facility shows strength in fire safety.

The Bad

1-Star Overall Rating

Below Wisconsin average (3.0)

Significant quality concerns identified by CMS

Staff Turnover: 44%

Near Wisconsin avg (46%)

Typical for the industry

Federal Fines: $9,750

Below median ($33,413)

Minor penalties assessed

Chain: NORTH SHORE HEALTHCARE

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

The Ugly 39 deficiencies on record

1 life-threatening 2 actual harm
Jul 2025 3 deficiencies 2 Harm
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 3 sampled residents (R2). R2 had a fall on 5/29/25. PA D (Physician Assistant) ordered x-rays STAT (right away) due to complaints of pain to right wrist and right hip. X-rays did not get completed as ordered. R2 was shaking due to severe pain the next morning and was sent to the hospital. R2 was diagnosed with a fracture to the right hip and pelvis as well as avulsion (a small piece of bone pulled off the wrist bone, causing a small fracture) to right wrist. The facility's failure to get the x-rays completed STAT as ordered resulted in a delay in treatment for R2. Evidenced by: The facility policy entitled Change in Condition, dated 9/20/22, states, in part: . A facility should immediately inform the resident; consult with the resident's physician; and notify, consistent with his or her authority, the resident's representative when there is an accident involving the resident which results in injury and has the potential for requiring physician intervention; a significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status (that is, a deterioration in health, mental, or psychosocial status in either life-threatening conditions or clinical complications); or a need to alter treatment significantly (that is, a need to discontinue an existing form of treatment due to adverse consequences, or to commence a new form of treatment). Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: When a resident presents with a possible change in condition, after a fall or other possible injury, trauma, or noted changes in mental or physical functioning: 1. Assess the resident's need for immediate care/medical attention. Provide emergency care as needed . 2. Notify resident's physician-Use INTERACT Change in Condition: When to report to the MD (medical doctor), NP (nurse practitioner), PA as a guideline . R2 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has diagnoses that include unilateral, primary osteoarthritis, left hip (type of arthritis that occurs when flexible tissue at the ends of bones wears down), personal history of (healed) traumatic fracture, and unspecified dementia. R2's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, dated 5/10/25, shows R2 has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8 indicating R2 has moderate cognitive impairment. R2's Care Plan, dated 7/10/23, states in part: . Focus: ADL (activities of daily living) self-care deficit as evidenced by need for staff assist r/t (related to) dementia. Date Initiated: 7/10/23. Revision on: 5/13/25 . Interventions/Tasks: *Ambulation/Locomotion: non-ambulatory at this time may stand/pivot transfer. Requires extensive assist of 1 staff for locomotion with w/c (wheelchair) at this time with wrist and hip fracture. Date Initiated: 7/10/23 Revision: 6/03/25 . *Transfer: Assist of 1-2 staff with CGA (contact guard assistance) to stand/pivot at this time. Date Initiated: 7/10/23 Revision on: 6/03/25 . At risk for complications due to musculosketal problems r/t fracture (R) wrist, (R) hip and T12 compression fracture. Date Initiated: 6/03/25 . *Provide assist of (specify level of assist) to transfer and reposition in bed. Date Initiated: 6/03/25 . R2's Un-Witnessed Fall Report, dated 5/29/25, at 3:40PM, states, in part: .Incident Description: . Resident found in hallway on floor, resident walked down hall holding onto side railing on wall with wheelchair down hallway in front of resident's room. Resident was seen by CNA (certified nursing assistant) fall forward hitting hand on side of railing onto floor with right arm under herself on her right side, resident fell onto right shoulder and placed right side of face on floor. Resident denied pain to right shoulder of [sic] face, c/o (complained of) pain to right wrist and right hip. PA D present during assessment. VS (vital signs) stable .ROM (range of motion) intact with some mild pain to right upper and lower extremities . Immediate Action Taken: Description: Resident assessed, VS stable, DON (director of nursing) aware of fall, PA D ordered X-ray images of Right wrist, pelvic and hip . Statements: CNA H. Relation: Ancillary Staff Date: 5/29/25 Statement: Seen resident walking down the hall holding on to side railing, went to get wheelchair (less than 50 feet away) and turned around, seen resident falling forward, hitting hand on side rail falling forward onto right shoulder and gently placing face on floor with fall . R2's Progress Notes are as follows: 5/29/25 3:40 PM Type: Clinical Follow Up Note Text: The current status is Fall due to resident self-transferring down hallway holding onto side railings. VS stable. ROM intact, mild pain with right wrist and right hip . PA D assessed resident at this time with orders for STAT x-ray of right wrist and pelvic and hip imaging . 5/29/25 3:59 PM Type: Communication-with Physician/Resident/Family/HPOA (healthcare power of attorney)/Guardian Note Text: Resident suffered from a fall. PA D here and gives orders as follows: -X-ray right wrist 3 views-STAT -X-ray pelvis and unilateral right hip-STAT Dx (diagnosis): Fall. 5/29/25 5:00 PM Type: Communication-with Physician/Resident/Family/HPOA/Guardian Note Text: This writer discussed with PA D in regard to STAT x-ray order. The company that provides the services may not be here till the next day. PA D hoped they would be here later in the evening but if not, monitor resident for signs of pain and send to hospital if needed. Important to note: Surveyor spoke with PA D and DON B and found DON B did not notify PA D that STAT X-rays were not completed until 5/30/25 when R2 was sent to ER (emergency room). 5/30/25 7:36 AM Type: SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment and Response)-Change in Condition Situation: Called to R2's room by therapist stating that resident trying to get out of bed and in severe pain on right hip area and moderate to maximum assist for transfer. Background: S/p (status post) fall yesterday afternoon with MD order for x-rays of hip/pelvis and right wrist. Has not been done yet and probably not until after lunch. Assessment (RN: Registered Nurse)/Appearance (LPN: Licensed Practical Nurse): Resident shaking in pain, moderate to maximum assist of 2 for transfer. Resident c/o severe pain to right hip with some shortening of RLE (right lower extremity). Bruising noted to right wrist . Response: Call placed to PA D and son informing of change and that resident needs to be seen in ER. Recommendations: Send to ER via ambulance. Son will meet at the hospital. 5/30/25 7:40 AM Type: Clinical Follow Up Note Text: The current status is Resident c/o severe right hip/pelvic pain 10/10 and requiring moderate/maximum assist of 2 for transfer as she was attempting to get out of bed. Resident also c/o severe pain while sitting in w/c. Resident was scheduled to have mobile x-ray today but due to severe pain, sending to ER for evaluation at this time with son, POA meeting at the hospital . 5/30/25 11:14 AM Type: Communication- with Physician/Resident/Family/HPOA/Guardian Note Text: This writer placed a call to ER with them reporting that resident indeed has fracture to right hip and pelvis as well as evulsion to right wrist. Resident is going to be transferred [Hospital name] for surgery . R2's Hospital Discharge summary, dated [DATE], at 1:12 PM, states, in part: .Date of Admission 5/30/25. Date of discharge: [DATE] .Principal Diagnosis: Closed displaced fracture of right femoral neck .Major Procedures: right hip hemiarthroplasty 5/30/35 . Summary of admission Chief Complaint, History of Present Illness, Pertinent Exam, Lab & Radiology Studies: .The patient lives at a nursing home. Yesterday, she was ambulating and had a fall. There are limited details available regarding the fall itself. She was brought to the emergency department today due to worsening pain . She endorses pain, and points to her right hip when I ask if she has any pain .Hospital course: . She underwent surgical fixation of her right hip fracture with orthopedic surgery . A cock-up wrist splint was placed for her right triquetral avulsion fracture . On 7/1/25 at 11:15 AM, Surveyor interviewed PA D. PA D indicated to Surveyor she was in the facility at the time of R2's fall on 5/29/25. PA D indicated she assessed R2 with the facility staff. PA D had concerns about the right hip with the way R2 had fallen on her right side and complained of pain to right wrist. PA D indicated she had ordered x-rays to be completed STAT on the right hip, wrist, and pelvis. Surveyor asked if PA D was notified the x-rays were not completed 5/29/25 and PA D indicated she was not notified the x-rays were not completed until R2 was sent to the ER on [DATE]. PA D indicated she expected the x-rays to be completed that day on 5/29/25 since she ordered them STAT. Surveyor asked PA D if she would expect to be notified if the x-rays were not able to be completed that day and PA D indicated yes, she probably would have sent R2 to the ER if they were not able to be completed. PA D indicated she would expect all orders to be followed especially STAT orders. On 7/1/25 at 12:20 PM, Surveyor interviewed RN C (Registered Nurse) who indicated on the morning of 5/30/25, approximately 6:30 AM, RN C was called to R2's room. Therapy had been passing by R2's room and heard R2 screaming in pain and trying to get out of her bed. RN C indicated she had found out in that morning's report R2 had a fall the day before on 5/29/25 and was to get x-rays on that day (5/30/25). RN C indicated she was not going to wait for the x-rays that day, so RN C sent R2 to the ER. RN C indicated R2 was in so much pain. RN C indicated R2 had received Tylenol around 5:30AM due to so much pain that AM. Surveyor asked RN C if a STAT order for an x-ray is received and cannot be completed that day due to mobile imaging what is the process to follow. RN C indicated the facility would notify the MD and see if s/he wants the resident sent to ER or what s/he would like to do. On 7/1/25 at 3:11 PM, Surveyor interviewed CNA H who indicated she was working with R2 the day R2 had fallen. CNA H indicated at the time of the fall R2 complained of pain to her right wrist and hip. Surveyor asked CNA H if R2 was experiencing pain the rest of that evening after she had fallen. CNA H indicated R2 would not get out of her wheelchair the rest of that evening which was a big change for R2. CNA H indicated she had noticed R2 was shaking around 7:30-8:00 PM. CNA H asked R2 if she was in pain at that time but R2 just mumbled. CNA H indicated she reported it to the nurse. CNA H indicated at 9:00 PM R2 was really shaking more. Surveyor asked CNA H if R2 was in pain and CNA H indicated R2 was not getting out of wheelchair, R2 was not walking that evening, and R2 was shaking, she felt R2 was in pain. CNA H indicated R2 was not acting her baseline, and it was reported to the nurse. On 7/1/25 at 3:25 PM, Surveyor interviewed DON B and asked what the facility's process is for receiving and completing STAT imaging orders. DON B indicated they go through a mobile imaging service. Once we receive orders for imaging we notify the company's dispatch service and notify them of the order being routine or a STAT order. If it is a routine order, the company will come 1 to 2 days after we notify them. If it is a STAT order we hope the company arrives within 4 hours of us notifying them. With STAT orders the dispatch service reaches out to the technicians that come to the facility to complete the imaging. The technicians are then to call us back with an estimated time frame. If we do not hear back within 2 - 4 hours it is expected we call them back. If the company is not able to make it to the facility the day the order is expected to be completed as STAT, it is expected the provider be notified and see if the provider wants the resident sent to ER for the imaging or if he wants the facility to monitor the resident. DON B indicated he found out the next morning around 7:00-7:30 AM when he arrived at the facility the x-rays had not been completed. It was reported R2 was in pain, and they sent her out to the ER. Surveyor asked DON B if the provider had been notified on 5/29/25 that the imaging STAT orders would not be completed. DON B indicated he had gone over to the clinic the afternoon of 5/30/25 and informed PA D that the x-rays were not completed as ordered on 5/29/25 and R2 was sent to the ER that morning due to pain. Surveyor asked DON B what PA D's expectation was for the STAT imaging orders and DON B indicated PA D felt the STAT orders should have been completed within 4 hours of receiving the order. DON B indicated his expectations were the STAT imaging orders should have been completed the evening of 5/29/25. DON B indicated the MD and his self should have been notified the evening of 5/29/25 that the orders would not be completed by the charge nurse. Surveyor asked DON B with R2 not wanting to get up out of wheelchair or ambulating that evening and shaking episodes, would that be considered a change in condition for R2. DON B indicated yes, and the MD should have been notified and R2 should have been sent to ER that evening. Surveyor asked if MD was notified that evening and DON B indicated no. On 7/1/25 at 3:55 PM, Surveyor interviewed LPN J who indicated on 5/29/25 she had come in to work at 6pm. LPN J had received in report that R2 had a fall that afternoon and the facility was monitoring R2, and imaging was coming that evening. Surveyor asked if she received a call from the imaging company saying they were coming or not coming. LPN J indicated it would be in her progress notes. LPN J looked and said there is no note, so no call was received. LPN indicated that by 8 or 9 pm if no call is received from the imaging company, it generally means the company will not be coming until the next day. Surveyor asked LPN J if the order is for STAT and at 8-9pm the company still has not shown up what is the expectation. LPN J indicated if she was at another facility she would send resident to ER, but this facility does not do it that way. We go through the imaging company. Surveyor asked LPN J if MD should have been notified and LPN J indicated we were monitoring R2 and if change in condition we would send her out. Surveyor asked if R2 not getting up out of wheelchair or wanting to ambulate would that be a change for R2. LPN J indicated a change in level, and she would put that on the 24-hour report. R2 experienced a delay in treatment due to STAT X-rays not getting completed as ordered and this was not communicated to R2's provider. R2 was shaking due to severe pain the next morning and was sent to the hospital. R2 was diagnosed with a fracture to the right hip and pelvis as well as evulsion to right wrist.
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure a resident's environment remained free of accide...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure a resident's environment remained free of accidents and hazards for 1 of 3 residents (R3) reviewed for falls. R3's family provided information related to R3's familiar routine and preferences. The facility failed to get this information on R3's baseline care plan, on R3's comprehensive care plan, or get it to the front line staff to use for fall prevention. R3's alarm did not sound when she self transferred. R3 fell and sustained a hip fracture. The facility's management staff reported to Surveyor that R3 has behaviors of deactivating her alarm system. R3's medical record does not contain goals, monitoring, or interventions related to this behavior in regard to fall prevention. Facility staff used education with R3 as an intervention for fall prevention when R3 was only oriented to self, noted to be confused at baseline, was assessed to have severe cognitive impairment, and have a diagnosis of Alzheimer's. Evidenced by: Facility policy, titled Fall Prevention and Management Guidelines, revised 7/18/24, includes: Policy-Each resident will be assessed for fall risk and will receive care and services in accordance with their individualized plan of care to minimize the likelihood of falls or reduce the possibility/severity of injury . upon admission the nurse will complete a fall risk assessment . the nurse will initiate interventions to help prevent falls on the resident's baseline care plan. Suggested standard interventions may include: implement universal environmental interventions that decrease the risk of resident falling . suggested interventions for residents determined to be at higher risk for falls may include: provide interventions that address unique risk factors measured by the risk assessment tool, medications, psychological, cognitive status, or recent changes in functional status. Provide additional interventions as directed by the resident's assessment and based on input from the resident or family members . Each resident's risk factors and environmental hazards will be evaluated when developing the resident's comprehensive plan of care . the plan of care will be revised as needed and should be communicated to the staff, the resident, and the residents family are responsible party . R3 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: Alzheimer's disease, dysphagia, unsteady on feet, weakness, long term use of anticoagulants, edema, and urinary tract infection. Her most recent MDS (Minimum Data Set) with ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 6/19/25 indicates R3's cognition is severely impaired with a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 3 out of 15. R3's Hospital Discharge, dated 6/13/25, includes: . female with history of Alzheimer's disease with significant cognitive deficits, chronic kidney disease, hypothyroidism, hypertension, chronic lower extremity edema who presents to hospital with recurrent falls, generalized weakness, worsening, lower extremity edema, and worsening confusion. The patient has had progressive memory issues and has been cared for in her home with family members and other caregivers in the past several years, but does continue to have some time at home alone. Family has noted her to be more confused and has had several falls over the past week or more. It is difficult to get a coherent history from the patient . She has been ambulating sometimes with the walker and sometimes without . In the emergency room, she was noted to be generally weak and confused with some agitation. Work up, including left neck, knee x-ray without acute findings, but underlying degenerative arthritis. Chest x-ray and rib films without acute fracture or acute process. Lab work significant for urine analysis consistent with Urinary Tract Infection. Lactate and white blood cell count normal . D [NAME] elevated with lower extremity ultrasound negative for DVT . The patient was treated with a dose of rosechin [sic] and intravenous fluids. She was monitored in the emergency room with the hope that she would be able to discharge to a skilled nursing facility, however, she had significant agitation which required one on one monitoring . Discharge diagnoses: primary-late onset Alzheimer's disease without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance or anxiety . Discharge to a skilled nursing home . R3's Fall Risk Assessment, dated 6/13/25, indicates R3 is at risk for falls with a score of 17. R3's Fall Risk Assessment includes: walk in room-limited assist of 1 staff . walk in corridor-limited assistance of 1 staff . locomotion on unit-limited assist of 1 staff . mobility device-wheelchair . ambulation/locomotion-wheelchair/ambulation with gait belt and assist of 1 . Balance-postural hypotensive, impulsivity or poor safety awareness . Fall history- 1 month- 1 to 2 falls . 2 months- 1 to 2 falls . 6 months- 1 to 2 falls . Additional risk factors: diuretics, antihypertensive, cathartics/laxatives . Continence in last 14 days- occasional incontinence . Resident is at risk for falls . R3's Nurse Notes, dated 6/13/25 at 2:54 PM, includes: . admitted from (hospital) . with the following diagnoses: urinary tract infection .late onset Alzheimer's dementia without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, or anxiety . Resident vitals- weight:170.6 pounds, height: 60 inches, temperature: 97.7 degrees F, pulse: 78, respirations: 18, blood pressure: 89/38, oxygen saturation: 98% on room air . Resident is assist of 1 with personal hygiene, transfers, dressing, toileting, and ambulation. Resident does ambulate with gait belt. Resident is at risk for falls due to impulsive and poor safety awareness and so has bed and wheelchair sensor alarms on. Resident is both continent and incontinent of bowel and bladder and does wear a pull up. Resident likes to sleep in recliner in her clothes. R3's Nurse Notes, dated 6/13/25 at 10:50 PM, includes: Resident is a . admitted from hospital . Resident is alert to self only. She is confused and wants to call her parents. She was given a house phone to use. Lungs clear and oxygen saturation is 94% on room air. Bowel sounds active . Resident is hard of hearing with no hearing aids. She is both continent and incontinent of urine and is wearing a pull up. She is in her recliner with her regular clothes on. Per family this is how she sleeps. Her favorite TV station is on the TV and she is watching it. She is a risk for falls due to confusion and willfulness. Many sticky notes from family are on wall directing staff to familiar [sic] cares for R3. She requires one assist with transfers, dressing, toileting, ambulation, personal hygiene. Recliner has pressure alarm in place, and it is working. Will continue to monitor safety of resident. R3's Baseline Care Plan and Comprehensive Care Plan, dated 6/13/25, includes: At risk for falls due to: increased confusion, Urinary Tract Infection, Alzheimer's disease . Encourage to transfer and change positions slowly. Have commonly used articles within easy reach . Effective date 6/13/25 . (It is important to note the person centered interventions noted in R3's Nurse Note dated 6/13/25, were not added to R3's Baseline Care Plan or R3's Comprehensive Care Plan.) R3's Nurse Note, dated 6/14/25 at 6:50 AM, includes: .Resident is alert to self only. She is confused and wants to call her parents. She was given a house phone to use . Resident sleeps in her recliner with her regular clothes on per family this is how she sleeps. Residents has a favorite TV station, will have on at all times. Risk for falls due to confusion and willfulness. Many sticky notes from family are on wall directing staff to familiar cares for (R3). Resident requires one assist with transfers, dressing, toileting, ambulation, personal hygiene. Recliner has pressure alarm in place, and it is working. Will continue to monitor safety of resident . (It is important to note the person-centered interventions noted of keeping R3's television on at all times, sleeping in her recliner, use of alarms, and sleeping with regular clothes on are noted in a nurses note, but were not put on R3's care plan.) R3's Nurse Note, dated 6/14/25 at 9:48 AM, includes: . Resident will not remain seated in her wheelchair. We have alarm on the seat of chair. She wants to stand and to go home. We explain that she could have a fall if not careful. Resident still wants to leave her wheelchair, Notified Director of Nursing, informed to call physician as needed. (It is important to note R3 has an alarm on her chair. R3's BIMS score of 3 out of 15 indicating severe cognitive impairment, her diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease, and staff are educating her as an intervention for fall prevention.) R3's Nurse Note, dated 6/14/25, at 12:51 PM, includes: Resident will not remain seated in her wheelchair. We have alarm on the seat of chair. She wants to stand and to go home. We explain that she could have a fall if not careful. Resident still wants to leave her wheelchair. (It is important to note R3's BIMS score of 3 out of 15 indicating severe cognitive impairment, her diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease, and staff are educating her as an intervention for fall prevention.) R3's Physician Communication Note, dated 6/14/25 at 2:01 PM, includes: Notified . physician of resident continued restlessness and unable to stop her from self-transferring, chair alarm intact and functioning, offered her activities and have her sitting with staff as much as possible but once left alone she continues to get up out of chair and is high fall risk, request for an order for as needed lorazepam for restlessness. R3's Physician Communication Note, dated 6/14/25 at 2:09 PM, includes: Medical Doctor ordered Lorazepam 0.5mg (milligrams) as needed twice daily for restlessness. R3's Nurse Note, dated 6/14/25 at 2:17 PM, includes: informed power of attorney of new medication ordered, okay with lorazepam ordered for resident. R3's Nurse Note, dated 6/14/25 at 2:50 PM, includes: . Resident is alert to self only. She is confused and wants to call her parents; she has been very restless, continues to try and self transfer or walker [sic] hallways, had staff sit one-on-one with her and still continues, notified (named) physician who ordered PRN lorazepam 0.5mg for 2x day awaiting E-script to be sent to pharmacy. Power of Attorney consented to medication . Resident sleeps in her recliner with her regular clothes on per family this is how she sleeps. Resident has a favorite TV station, will have on at all times. Risk for falls due to confusion and willfulness. Many sticky notes from family are on wall directing staff to familiar cares for resident. Resident requires one assist with transfers, dressing, toileting, ambulation, personal hygiene. Recliner has pressure alarm in place, and it is working. Daughter visited her today and sat with her outside for awhile. Chair alarm intact and functioning while in wheelchair, does not stop resident from standing up and transferring self. Will continue to monitor safety of resident. R3's Nurse Note, dated 6/14/25 at 8:57 PM, includes: . Resident at this time is in wheelchair going up and down hallways. She is very quiet. R3's Nurse Note, dated 6/14/25 at 10:50 PM, includes: . Resident is alert to self only. She is confused and very impulsive. Resident is hard of hearing with no hearing aids. She is both continent and incontinent of urine and is wearing a pull up. Resident sleeps in her recliner with her regular clothes on per family this is how she sleeps. Residents has a favorite TV station, will have on at all times. Risk for falls due to confusion and willfulness. Many sticky notes from family are on wall directing staff to familiar cares for (R3). Resident requires one assist with transfers, dressing, toileting, ambulation, personal hygiene. Recliner has pressure alarm in place, and it is working. Staff is doing frequent checks and 1:1 with her as needed. Will continue to monitor safety of resident . R3's Nurse Note, dated 6/15/25 at 6:50 AM, includes: . Resident is alert to self only. She is confused and restless . Resident sleeps in her recliner with her regular clothes on per family this is how she sleeps. Residents has a favorite TV station, will have on at all times. High risk for falls due to confusion and willfullness, chair alarm intact and functioning. Many sticky notes from family are on wall directing staff to familiar cares for R3. Recliner has pressure alarm in place, and it is working . Will continue to monitor for safety of resident. R3's Nurse Note, dated 6/15/25 at 10:50 PM, includes: . Resident is alert to self only. She is confused at baseline. Resident has slept most of the day in the recliner chair . resident sleeps in her recliner with her regular clothes on per family this is how she sleeps. Resident has a favorite TV station will have on at all times. High risk for falls due to confusion and willfulness, chair alarm intact and functioning. Many sticky notes from family are on wall directing staff to familiar cares for R3 . recliner has pressure alarm in place and it is working. No pain or discomfort noted. Will continue to monitor safety of resident. R3's SBAR Change of Condition Form, dated 6/20/25 at 7:23 PM, includes: Called to resident's room by Licensed Practical Nursing (LPN) and another resident who saw resident sit on the floor in her room and then scooting on her buttock out into the hallway. Other resident states that she did not hit her head. Resident herself unable to tell staff what she was trying to do. Resident was assisted into her w/c (wheelchair) and allowed to propel in hallway with staff observing her whereabouts. Vitals: temperature- 98.4; pulse- 93; respirations- 20; blood pressure- 139/45; oxygen saturation level- 96% on room air. Background: Alzheimer's dementia with sundowning. Assessment (Registered Nurse)/Appearance (Licensed Practical Nurse): Resident was found to have no internal/external rotation or shortening of lower extremity. No new skin issues noted. Vitals stable. No complaints of pain. Resident was placed in her wheelchair with sensor alarm in wheelchair and allowed to roam to help tire her out. Assessment: Recommendations: Allow resident to roam to help tire her out, offer her snacks and see if will watch TV. Response: Power of Attorney updated, Nurse on call notified. Physician updated . who saw resident and stated neuros not needed. Monitor per facility protocol. R3's Fall Report, dated 6/20/25, includes: witnessed fall . Incident Description: Called to resident's room by Licensed Practical Nursing and another resident who saw resident sit on the floor in her room and then scooting on her buttock out into the hallway. Other resident states that she did not hit her head. Resident herself unable to tell staff what she was trying to do. Resident was assisted into her w/c and allowed to propel in hallway with staff observing her whereabouts. Vitals: temperature- 98.4; pulse- 93; respirations- 20; blood pressure- 139/45; oxygen saturation level- 96% on room air . Alzheimer's dementia with sundowning . Resident Description: Resident unable to give description . Immediate Action Taken: Try to keep resident in line of sight when up wandering . Mental status- oriented to person . Predisposing Environmental Factors: Fall alarm sounding, fall alarm on and properly positioned . Predisposing Physiological Factors: confused, gait imbalance, impaired memory . Predisposing Situation Factors: ambulating without assistance . Other resident interview/witness to fall: I saw resident walking in room, then lost balance and sat down on the floor and then started scooting on her buttock towards the hallway. She did not hit her head. R3's Comprehensive Care Plan, updated 6/20/25 with the following: Pressure alarm on at all times to be transferred from bed to wheelchair to recliner. R3's Nurse Note, dated 6/21/25 at 4:23 AM, includes: No new complaints of pain. No signs or symptoms of any new injury from fall. Will continue to monitor resident more closely when more restless and maybe even try one on one (if able). Otherwise monitor resident safety. R3's Therapy Note, dated 6/21/25 at 12:23 PM, includes: Cognitive status: Never/rarely made decisions . confused . Resident has been alert but confused, is occasionally participating in therapy. Resident and staff educated to elevate her lower extremities when sitting in her recliner. Resident requires assist of one with transfers with gait belt, assist of one for personal hygiene, dressing and tray set up for meals. Pain is monitored every shift and resident given prn Tylenol. Resident taking her medications as ordered. Nursing monitoring oral intake and encourage. Nursing monitoring for any signs of anxiety/restlessness . Resident displayed the following: Wandering Exit seek behaviors. Resident exit seeking, wandering and confused. Chair alarm intact and functioning, wanderguard intact . R3's Nurse Note, dated 6/21/25 at 8:30 PM, includes: The current status is no new complaints of pain. No signs of any new injury from fall. Will continue to monitor resident closely. Chair alarm intact and functioning. Continue to educate resident to transfer with staff assistance. (It is important to note R3's BIMS score is 3 out of 15 indicating her cognition is severely impaired, R3's assessments and nurse notes indicate R3 is only oriented to herself, R3's diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease, and nurse notes indicating R3 is confused at baseline. It is also important to note the intervention being used is educating R3 to transfer with staff assistance.) R3's Interdisciplinary Team Meeting Note, dated 6/23/25, includes: Resident had a witnessed fall Resident is a new admit within the last week and a half, resident has an Alzheimer's diagnosis, resident is an assist of 1, resident is alert to self only. Care Plan review/update: Resident has Alzheimer's diagnosis, resident is difficult to direct, resident has had poor intake, resident is not aware of safety hazards, resident is impulsive, resident was sitting in recliner, resident had just spilled her med plus 2.0, resident to ambulate when resident is showing signs of restlessness . R3's Comprehensive Care Plan, updated 6/23/25 with the following: When noted to be restless offer to ambulate in hallway with contact gait assistance of 1 staff and walker . Tab alarm on when up in wheelchair. R3's SBAR Change of Condition Form, dated 6/24/25 at 10:55 PM, includes: Unwitnessed fall with pain to left leg and external rotation . CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) responded to resident yelling for help. Resident was sitting in recliner prior to fall in gown. Assessment (RN)/Appearance (LPN): Resident was found on the floor with head against bathroom door lying curled on left side. Complained of pain to left leg. Vitals: Blood Pressure: 162/75 Pulse: 8 [sic] Respirations:18 Oxygen saturation: 94% on room air. Temperature: 97.7degrees F . Assessment: Resident noted to have old scabbed abrasion to left knee and raised red area to knee. Lift to bed via hoyer and noted that resident was unable to lift leg without using hands. Resident stated that pain was in left groin area. Recommendations: (blank) Response: Assistant Director of Nursing informed of fall and agreed that resident should be sent to emergency room stat. Daughter informed of transfer to hospital report called to emergency room nurse and ambulance called. R3's Fall Report, dated 6/24/25 at 11:45 PM, including: Unwitnessed fall . in resident's room . Nursing description: CNA responded to resident yelling for help. Resident was sitting in recliner prior to fall in gown. Resident description: Resident unable to give description. Immediate action taken: Resident was found on the floor with head against bathroom door lying curled on left side. Complained of pain to left leg. Brief was pulled down and floor in front of chair was wet. Resident noted to have old scabbed abrasion to left knee and raised red area to knee. Lift to bed via hoyer and noted that resident was unable to lift leg without using hands. Resident stated pain was in left groin area. Taken to hospital: yes. Level of pain: occasional labored breathing. Short periods of hyperventilation. Negative vocalization: occasional moan or groan. Low level of speech with negative quality. Facial Expression: facial grimacing. Body language: rigid, fists clenched, knees pulled up, pulling or pushing away. Striking out. Consolability: distracted or reassured by voice or touch . Oriented to person . Predisposing Environmental Factors: Fall alarm improperly placed/not functioning. Predisposing Physiological Factors: Confused, impaired memory, incontinent. Predisposing Situation Factors: Ambulating without assist. Other info: Alarm was in chair not alarming, floor wet, and brief down . Statements: CNA F: I am not sure if it was water or urine on the floor. I last toileted her at 9:00 PM, she voided quite a bit and had some on the toilet seat. I had toileted her a couple times throughout PM shift, she had a medium bowel movement and was incontinent as well during the shift earlier. CNA G said he saw her last at 10:30 PM and she was asleep in her chair. CNA I: The last time I can confirm the alarm working was at the end of PM shift, so I guess 10:00 PM. Not sure the last time she was toileted, she was sleeping in her recliner the last time I saw her, I could not tell you the exact time. The floor was wet from water, but that was in front of her recliner, not where she fell, where she fell was dry. The alarm was in place in the chair, when I entered the room after the fall it was turned off. I checked it and it worked at that time. CNA F says it was on prior to the fall but when I entered after I turned it on and it worked fine. Resident had some agitation as she did not like the night gown and wanted to be in regular clothes. When I walked in after the fall she was incontinent of bladder. CNA G: I believe she was getting up to go look for clothes to go home. Last time I saw her was 10:30 PM. She was sitting on her alarm pad and it appeared to be on. I didn't get her up to check if it would sound or anything but she was sleeping and seemed to be all good. Last time I know of that she was toileted was 9:00 PM by CNA F. I am not sure what the liquid was but when she fell her brief was by her knees and I didn't see any water in sight so I am guessing it was urine. The alarm was on but it wasn't beeping. CNA I turned it off and back on after the fall and it worked fine. I can't think of anything else at this time. R3's Nurse Note, dated 6/24/25 at 11:57 PM, includes: Emergency Services arrived and transferred to hospital emergency room . Bones: . impacted fracture left proximal femur . Impression: Subcapital (fracture extends through the head and neck of the femur) fracture left hip. R3's emergency room Note, dated 6/25/25 at 12:21 AM, includes: Disposition: transfer to other facility . History of present illness: . presenting with left hip pain after an unwitnessed fall this evening at the nursing home where the patient resides . While at the nursing home this evening, the patient had an unwitnessed fall with left hip pain after the fall. Uncertain whether the patient hit her head. No loss of consciousness was witnessed. The patient is not anticoagulated. The patient herself is unable to give a history due to dementia. Physical exam: In pain with any hip movement. Suspect posterior cervical spine tenderness, without obvious step-off . Dentition appears unaffected from the fall, though patient's dentition is poor. Pelvis appears stable with left hip tenderness at the pelvis. No obvious distal left femur or distal extremity deformity, nor obvious deformity of joints . No tenderness with right leg motion at hip . R3's Interdisciplinary Team Meeting Note, dated 6/25/25 at 9:14 AM, includes: Reason for Review: Resident had an unwitnessed . Resident is impulsive, resident has Alzheimer's dx, resident will sundown, resident can be difficult to redirect, resident recent admission comes independent from home, resident wanders throughout facility in wheelchair. Resident is not aware of safety hazards. Care Plan Review/Updates: RCA (Root cause analysis)- Resident was sleeping in recliner, resident was in gown and brief, resident attempted to self-transfer and ambulate without assistance to the bathroom, resident did not call for assistance, resident is not aware of safety hazards, resident took brief off on way to bathroom, resident lost balance and fell to the floor. Resident cannot always verbalize her needs. Intervention - Staff to offer assist with routine toileting at routine times for example upon arising, and before and after meals, therapy, activates and at bed time. Resident to be checked on noc shift rounds. R3's Comprehensive Care Plan, updated 6/25/25, to include: Offer toileting more frequently as does not alert staff to needs and check on rounds at night for toileting needs. (Of note: R3 was placed in a gown instead of her own clothes (per family R3 prefers to sleep in her clothes). R3's alarm did not function properly when R3 was attempting to self transfer as it was noted to be turned off.) R3's Orthopedic Pre-operative Note, dated 6/25/25 at 10:00 AM, includes: R3 arrives to surgery from emergency room with left hip fracture. Patient is disoriented to person, place, time, situation, and at baseline . presents with left hip fracture following an unwitnessed fall at her skilled nursing facility. Chief complaint: left hip fracture. History: . Per chart review, patient recently hospitalized [DATE]-[DATE] . for recurrent falls, worsening confusion and generalized weakness. Given Rocephin and Fosfomycin for urinary tract infection with urine culture growing pan sensitive E.Coli. Appears family was interested in more of a comfort care approach . She was started on Zyprexa and ultimately discharged to skilled nursing facility. Last night she was brought to the emergency room from her facility for left hip pain after an unwitnessed fall. She arrived afebrile, vitally stable, non-hypoxic on room air . CT pelvis showed subcapital fracture of the left hip . On interview with the patient, she reports being in pain, but otherwise not oriented to situation and unable to provide further meaningful history. (It is important to note R3's fall resulted in harm when she was diagnosed with a fracture of the left hip.) R3's Orthopedic Consultation, dated 6/25/25 at 10:22 AM, includes: reason for consult: left hip fracture . Plan to take patient to operating room for left hip hemiarthroplasty . R3's Orthopedic Pre-operative Note, dated 6/25/25 at 1:40 PM, includes: pre-operative diagnosis: left femoral neck fracture, pathological due to osteoporosis with minimal trauma . Procedure: cemented hemiarthroplasty of the hip . Findings: displaced fracture of the femoral neck with general poor bone quality . R3's X-ray, dated 6/25/25 at 2:29 PM, includes: X-ray pelvis and lateral hip: final result . closed fracture of left hip, initial . Narrative and Impression: x-ray of pelvis and lateral hip obtained on 6/25/25 at 2:29 PM . Reason for exam: post op . Impression: Left hip hemiarthroplasty without immediate postoperative complication. The sacroiliac joints, right hip joint and symphysis pubis remain grossly aligned. Soft tissue gas overlies the operative site. R3's Kardex, dated 7/1/25, includes: bed mobility- assist of 1, at times able to reposition self . dressing- assist of 1 set up and encourage her to do what she is able, assist with lower body dressing . Safety- alert bracelet to left ankle for safety, FYI (for your information) Fall Risk, Pressure alarm on at all times to be transferred from bed to recliner. Have commonly used articles within easy reach, offer toileting more frequently as does not alert staff to needs and check on rounds at night for toileting needs, provide assistance in locating own room, tab alarm on when up in wheelchair, when noted to be restless offer to ambulate in hallway with . assist of one staff and walker . On 7/1/25 at 12:39 PM, DON B (Director of Nursing) indicated at the time of R3's unwitnessed fall her alarm was turned off. DON B stated, We concluded that we think she shut it off herself, before transferring. DON B and Surveyor reviewed R3's current Comprehensive Care Plan and Kardex. DON B indicated R3's comprehensive care plan and Kardex do not contain goals or interventions related to R3's behavior of shutting off her own pressure alarm. On 7/1/25 at 12:56 PM, LPN E (Licensed Practical Nurse) indicated R3's family leaves sticky notes on the wall behind her bed with information related to R3's preferences and familiar routine. LPN E indicated family reported to the facility staff that R3 prefers to sleep in her recliner wearing her street clothes. LPN E indicated the night of R3's fall she was dressed in a hospital gown. LPN E and Surveyor reviewed R3's Baseline Care Plan/Comprehensive Care Plan and Kardex. LPN E indicated R3's preferences should be on the Kardex and Comprehensive Care Plan, but they aren't. LPN E indicated she was unaware R3 likes to have a certain channel on her TV and her TV on at all times. On 7/1/25 at 1:13 PM, RN C (Registered Nurse) stated, She liked to sleep in her recliner fully dressed. I did her admission. I put it in a nurses note. RN C indicated Certified Nursing Assistants who dress R3 do not look at nurse notes often, because they get their information from the Kardex. Surveyor and RN C reviewed R3's Comprehensive Care Plan and Kardex. RN C indicated she did not add this entry on R3's care plan, but she did get a recliner for R3's room. RN C and Surveyor reviewed R3's fall from 6/24/25 noting R3 was wearing a hospital gown. On 7/1/25 at 2:46 PM, CNA F (Certified Nursing Assistant) indicated she was working on 6/24/25 when CNA G heard a scream and when she went to look she found R3 on the floor. CNA F indicated R3's alarm was placed, but it was not sounding when R3 fell. CNA F indicated R3 does not shut her own alarm off. CNA F stated, I helped her last. I put alarm on. I think it did not function properly. CNA F indicated she was not aware of R3's preference to sleep in street clothes and that is why she put a hospital gown on R3. CNA F stated, I didn't know she liked personal clothes on. It was my fault. I apologize about that. I just did what I know and put her in our gowns. I would find that information in the care plan or the Kardex. CNA F indicated the family writes on Sticky notes and posts them on wall behind her bed with information related to R3's familiar routine and preferences. CNA F indicated that one of the sticky notes stated R3 likes to sleep in recliner. CNA F stated, That was not in the care plan. Surveyor asked about her personal clothing preference, CNA F stated, I do not see this on her care plan. We have different nurses too at times and they wouldn't maybe know her clothing preference or her preference of sleeping in a recliner. It should be in the care plan. CNA F indicated the alarm has since been exchanged for one that is functioning all the time. On 7/1/25 at 2:50 PM, DON B, CNA F, and Surveyor observed sticky notes on wall behind R3's bed. DON B indicated sticky notes are not part of R3's medical record or care plan. DON B indicated it is his expectation that CNAs would use the residents' Kardex and Care Plan for information on how to care for residents. On 7/1/25 at 3:14 PM, DON B indicated if family provides information about preferences it should be added to the resident's care plan. DON B stated, We found out now she likes to be in a gown with a sweatshirt and pants on. Surveyor and DON B reviewed R3's care plan. DON B stated, It could be added in there. DON B indicated person-centered care information should get to front
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0605 (Tag F0605)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that 1 of 3 residents (R3) reviewed for receiving a psychotrop...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that 1 of 3 residents (R3) reviewed for receiving a psychotropic medication were free from unnecessary drugs. R3 receives Olanzapine, an antipsychotic medication, for Alzheimer's disease with late onset. This is evidenced by: The facility policy titled, Use of Psychotropic Medications, reviewed 4/27/25, includes: it is the intent of this policy to ensure that residents only receive psychotropic medications when other non-pharmacological interventions are clinically contradicted. Additionally these medications should only be used to treat residents medical symptoms and not used for discipline or staff convenience, which would deem it a chemical restraint. Adequate indications for use refers to the identified, documented clinical rationale for administering a medication that is based upon an assessment of the resident's condition and therapeutic goals and after any other treatments have been deemed clinically contradicted. For psychotropic medications, without documentation in the record explaining that the practitioner has determined that other treatments have been deemed clinically contraindicated, the indication for use is inadequate. Also, adequate indication for use means that the medication administered is consistent with manufacturers recommendations and/or clinical practice guidelines, clinical standards of practice, medication references, clinical studies or evidence based review of articles that are published in medical and/or pharmacy journals . chemical restraint refers to any drug used for discipline or that makes it more convenient for staff to care for a resident, and not required to treat medical symptoms. This includes instances when a psychotropic medication may be approved to treat certain symptoms, however, non-pharmacological interventions should be used or attempted, unless clinically contraindicated, because they are less dangerous to the residents health and safety . A psychotropic drug is any drug that affects brain activity is associated with mental processes and behavior. Psychotropic drugs include but are not limited to the following categories: antipsychotics, antidepressants, anti-anxiety, and hypnotics. Psychotropic medications are to be used only when a practitioner determines that the medication is appropriate to treat a resident's specific, diagnosed, and documented condition and the medication is beneficial to the resident as demonstrated by monitoring and documentation of the resident's response to the medication . R3 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: Alzheimer's disease, dysphagia, unsteady on feet, weakness, long term use of anticoagulants, edema, and urinary tract infection. Her most recent MDS (Minimum Data Set) with ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 6/19/25 indicates R3's cognition is severely impaired with a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 3 out of 15. R3's physician orders, June 2025 and July 2025, states in part: . Olanzapine Oral tablet 2.5 MG (milligrams) . Give one tablet by mouth at bedtime related to Alzheimer's disease with late onset. (It is important to note Alzheimer's disease with late onset is not an appropriate indication of use for an antipsychotic.) On 7/1/25 at 3:50 PM PA D (Physician Assistant) indicated she prescribed R3 Olanzapine due to her late onset Alzheimer's disease with behavioral disturbance. Surveyor asked PA D if R3 had behaviors that were persistent and harmful to herself or others. PA D indicated R3 is someone who has severe psychosis in her mental state, she is impulsive, and she lacks safety awareness. Surveyor asked PA D to describe R3's psychosis. PA D indicated R3 tries to stand without help, wanders, and at times thinks she needs to be somewhere else. On 7/1/25 at 5:10 PM NHA A (Nursing Home Administrator) indicated wandering, lacking safety awareness, and self-transferring are common symptoms in a person with Alzheimer's disease and does not necessarily warrant the use of an antipsychotic medication. NHA A indicated the facility has done some education with area providers on unnecessary medication use and they will continue to educate them. The facility failed to ensure residents receiving antipsychotic medications have appropriate diagnoses for medication use.
Mar 2025 12 deficiencies 1 IJ
CRITICAL (J)

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Pressure Ulcer Prevention (Tag F0686)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure each resident received care, consistent with pro...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure each resident received care, consistent with professional standards of practice (SOP), to prevent pressure injuries (PI) and each resident with PIs receives necessary treatment and services to promote healing and prevent new injuries from developing for 2 of 5 residents (R35 and R44) reviewed for pressure injuries. R35 was at risk for PI development. R35 developed two stage 3 facility acquired PIs that deteriorated. Observations were made of multiple layers between R35 and the air mattress. The facility failed to provide education and/or risks vs benefits when R35 declined repositioning. Staff did not ensure consistent documentation of repositioning or incontinence care, which were noted contributors to R35's PIs. Staff did not protect R35's periwound when applying the prescribed treatment. The facility's failures to implement preventive interventions for residents at risk for PIs, failure to provide education and/or risks vs. benefits when a resident declined repositioning, and failure to correctly apply a prescribed treatment created a finding of immediate jeopardy that began on 1/15/25. Surveyor notified Nursing Home Administrator A (NHA) of the immediate jeopardy on 2/28/25 at 10:05 AM. The immediate jeopardy was removed on 2/28/25; however, the deficient practice continues at a scope/severity of G (actual harm/isolated) as the facility continues to implement their action plan as evidenced by: R44 was admitted with a pressure injury. The facility failed to complete weekly pressure injury assessments per standards of practice. Observations were made of multiple layers between R44 and the air mattress. R44's PI deteriorated as evidenced by undermining and tunneling. Evidenced by: The AMDA (American Medical Directors Association) clinical practice guideline titled, 'Pressure Ulcers and Other Wounds,' dated 2017, states in part: .A pressure ulcer (Injury) is localized damage to the skin or underlying soft tissue, usually over a bony prominence or related to a medical or other device. The ulcer may present as intact skin or as an open ulcer and may be painful. The ulcer occurs as a result of intense or prolonged pressure or pressure in combination with shear .Recognition: Early recognition of pressure ulcers and of any risk associated with the development of pressure ulcers and other wounds is critical to their successful prevention and management .Assessment: The purpose of the assessment is to collect enough information to evaluate the patient's general condition, characterize a pressure ulcer, and identify related causes and complications. The National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel (NPIAP) at www.NPIAP.com defines PIs in the following categories: Category/Stage II: Partial thickness loss - Partial thickness loss of dermis presenting as a shallow open ulcer with a red, pink wound bed, without slough. May also present as an intact or open/ruptured serum-filled or serosanguineous filled blister. Category/Stage III: Full thickness skin loss - Full thickness tissue loss. Subcutaneous fat may be visible, but bone, tendon or muscles are not exposed. Slough may be present but does not obscure the depth of tissue loss. May include undermining and tunneling. The depth of a Category/Stage III pressure ulcer varies by anatomical location. Unstageable/Unclassified: Full thickness skin or tissue loss - depth unknown. Full thickness tissue loss in which actual depth of the ulcer is completely obscured by slough (yellow, tan, gray, green or brown) and/or eschar (tan, brown or black) in the wound bed. Until enough slough and/or eschar are removed to expose the base of the wound, the true depth cannot be determined; but it will be either a Category/Stage III or IV. Wound Source article titled Pressure Injury and Microclimate: How Linen Layers May Contribute dated 2/14/24 states in part, . Pressure Injury Risk: How Linen Layers May Contribute: Linen layers have the potential to impact skin microclimate in the following ways: Reduce airflow Affect pressure redistribution Increase friction coefficient Dry or macerate skin Increase skin temperature Clinicians should select the correct type and amount of layers between the patient and support surface. Evidence suggests this selection is a high-value, low-cost, intervention. Regarding linen type, the NPIAP 2019 guidelines specifically recommend the use of silk or silk-like sheets versus cotton and cotton blend sheets . Regarding linen number, experts have found that incontinence pads, transfer sheets, or a combination of linens can significantly increase the mean peak sacral pressure when compared to a single flat sheet. Even on both a low-air-loss surface and foam surface, regardless of head-of-bed angle, pressure may be increased. This occurrence was confirmed by an in vitro study by [NAME] et al which examined the effect on interface pressures with the use of wet and dry incontinence pads against the gluteal and sacral areas of mannequins with soft, tissue-like qualities. In a 2018 retrospective review using International Pressure Ulcer Prevalence data from 216,626 participants, additional linen layers were found as a risk factor for both superficial and severe pressure injuries . Pressure Injury and Microclimate: How Linen Layers May Contribute | WoundSource The facility's policy titled Pressure Injuries and Non pressure Injuries last reviewed on 7/20/2022, states in part, .Stage 3 Pressure Injury: Full-thickness loss of skin, in which adipose (fat) is visible in the ulcer and granulation tissue and epibole (rolled wound edges) are often present .Additional Skin Impairment Definitions: Moisture Associated Skin Damage: inflammation of the skin and erosion from prolonged exposure to moisture and its [sic] contents. Common sources of moisture include urine and stool, perspiration, wound exudate, and effluent from an ostomy .2. Weekly: a. Complete a head-to-toe skin check and document findings on the Skin Review .If new areas are present: i. notify MD (Medical Doctor) ii. Notify resident/ responsible party iii. Initiate treatment per order .b. Assess current wounds at least every 7 days, or more frequently as needed (e.g., decline in wound, presence of infection, wound healed) . Example 1: R35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and was readmitted to the facility after a hospitalization on 12/31/24 with diagnoses that included osteomyelitis of vertebra (infection in the spine), type 2 diabetes mellitus, morbid obesity, and radiculopathy of lumbar region (a condition where nerve roots on the lower back are compressed or irritated, causing pain and other symptoms that radiate down the leg-numbness, tingling, burning, weakness or muscle spasms, difficulty walking or standing, loss of reflexes in the leg). R35's most recent MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 1/6/25 states that R35 has a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) of 13 out of 15, indicating that R35 is cognitively intact. The MDS also indicates that R35 is dependent on staff for toileting, bathing, transfers, and bed mobility. R35 is always incontinent of bowel and bladder and has paralysis of her lower extremities. R35's care plan dated 11/21/24 and revised on 1/30/25 states in part: Interventions: *Administer treatments as ordered and monitor for effectiveness (initiated 11/21/24). *Monitor dressing to ensure it is intact and adhering. Report lose [sic] dressing to treatment nurse (revised 12/10/24). *Monitor nutritional status. Serve diet as ordered, monitor intake and record (initiated 12/10/24). *Monitor/document/report PRN (as needed) any changes in skin status: appearance, color, wound healing, s/sx (signs and symptoms) of infection, wound size ., stage (initiated 11/21/24). *Resident is to be turned and repositioned in even hours using a wedge and may be on back for meals only, more often as needed or requested (initiated 1/30/25). *The resident requires the bed to be as flat as possible to reduce shear. The resident prefers to be repositioned with 2 people (revised 12/10/24). The resident requires air flotation mattress on bed (initiated 12/10/24). Treat pain as per orders prior to treatment/turning etc. to ensure the resident's comfort (initiated 12/10/24). Weekly treatment documentation to include measurement of each area of skin breakdown's width, length, depth, type of tissue, and exudate (initiated 12/10/24) . It is important to note that R35's care plan was not updated to reflect current wounds and locations. R35's repositioning intervention was added 22 days after the development of the PI. R35's Braden Scale (for predicting pressure sore risk) scores are as follows: 11/27/24: 16-at risk 12/6/24: 16-at risk 12/13/24: 15-at risk 1/10/25: 16-at risk 1/17/25: 14-moderate risk 1/24/25: 14-moderate risk R35's weekly skin checks since readmission, indicate the following: 1/9/25: dry skin 1/16/25: pressure injury to coccyx 1/23/25: coccyx stage 2, left gluteal fold (boundary between the buttocks and posterior (back) of thigh) 1/30/25: coccyx stage 2, left gluteal fold 2/6/25: coccyx wound 2/13/25: PI - buttock R35's Non-Pressure Weekly Tracker documentation is as follows: 1/8/25: .2. Wound acquired: b. In house. 2a. Date acquired: 1/8/25. 3. Type: h) Open area. 4. Location: Lower gluteal cleft buttock .5a. Length 4.8 cm (centimeters) 5b. Width 2.7cm. 5c. Depth 0.1cm .7. Drainage e. purulent. 8. Amount of drainage b. light .23. Comments: MASD (Moisture Associated Skin Damage) .6. Additional interventions/plans: Dressing treatment Plan Primary Dressing(s) Zinc ointment apply Q (every) shift 3xday (3 times a day) for 30 days Plan of care reviewed and addressed Recommendations cleanse with wound cleanser at time of dressing change; off- load wound; reposition per facility protocol; turn side to side in bed every 1-2 hours if able . 1/15/25: . 4. Location: Coccyx. Description: Wound area previously documented as MASD has now progressed to stage 3 pressure injury .5a. Length 3.4 cm 5b. Width 1.9cm. 5c. Depth 0.1cm .Tissue Type .6c. Granulation 30% 6d. Slough 70% .7. Drainage b. Serous. 8. Amount of drainage c. moderate .23. Comments: MASD- Wound area previously documented as MASD has now progressed to stage 3 pressure injury of coccyx as of 1/15/25. This tracker to be closed and completed, new tracker will be opened .6. Additional interventions/plans: Dressing treatment Plan Primary Dressing(s) Leptospermum honey to wound bed followed by duoderm (adhesive dressing) 3x/week (3 times per week) Plan of care reviewed and addressed Recommendations cleanse with wound cleanser at time of dressing change; off- load wound; reposition per facility protocol; turn side to side in bed every 1-2 hours if able. [Wound Care Doctor] here to eval and treat resident. Surgical excisional debridement procedure completed at bedside. Resident tolerated well . It is important to note despite the MASD deteriorating to a stage 3 pressure injury (PI) the facility continued to document this PI on the facility's non-pressure wound tracker. 1/22/25: .5a. Length 14.7 cm 5b. Width 2cm. 5c. Depth 0.4cm .Tissue Type .6c. Granulation 30% 6d. Slough 70% .7. Drainage b. Serous. 8. Amount of drainage d. heavy .23. Comments: MASD- Wound area previously documented as MASD has now progressed to stage 3 pressure injury of coccyx as of 1/15/25. This tracker to be closed and completed, new tracker will be opened. Exacerbated due to increased drainage and noncompliant with offloading .6. Additional interventions/plans: Dressing treatment Plan Primary Dressing(s) Santyl apply once daily followed by calcium alginate. Skin prep peri wound. Cover with foam with border daily. Plan of care reviewed and addressed Recommendations cleanse with wound cleanser at time of dressing change; offload wound; reposition per facility protocol; turn side to side in bed every 1-2 hours if able. [Wound Care Doctor] here to eval and treat resident. Surgical excisional debridement procedure completed at bedside. Resident tolerated well . Of note: on 1/22/25 the PI deteriorated by increasing in size, heavy drainage. Despite staff noting R35 was noncompliant with offloading, there is no evidence of education or risks vs benefits being provided. R35's MAR (Medication Administration Record) has the following order: * Ensure resident is being repositioned every 2 hours. Every shift. Start date: 1/30/25. The following dates and shifts are marked no: 2/1/25 PM (evening) shift, 2/5/25 PM shift, and 2/14/25 PM and NOC (night) shifts. Of note: R35's order to be repositioned was not added to the MAR until 1/30/25. 1/29/25: . stage 3 pressure injury .5a. Length 18.2 cm 5b. Width 3.2cm. 5c. Depth 0.2cm .Tissue Type .6c. Granulation 70% 6d. Slough 10% 6e. Necrotic 20% .7. Drainage b. Serous. 8. Amount of drainage c. moderate .23. Comments: MASD- Wound area previously documented as MASD has now progressed to stage 3 pressure injury of coccyx as of 1/15/25. This tracker to be closed and completed, new tracker will be opened. Exacerbated due to increased drainage and incontinence .6. Additional interventions/plans: Dressing treatment Plan Primary Dressing(s) Sodium hypochlorite (dakins) apply once daily and as needed for 30 days: 0.125% dakins Secondary dressing(s) ABD pad apply once daily for 30 days. Plan of care reviewed and addressed Recommendations cleanse with wound cleanser at time of dressing change; offload wound; reposition per facility protocol; turn side to side in bed every 1-2 hours if able. [Wound Care Doctor] here to eval and treat resident. Surgical excisional debridement procedure completed at bedside. Resident tolerated well . 2/5/25: . stage 3 pressure injury .5a. Length 14.1 cm 5b. Width 10.1cm. 5c. Depth 0.3cm .Tissue Type .6a. Skin 10% 6d. Slough 85% 6e. Necrotic 5% .7. Drainage b. Serous. 8. Amount of drainage c. moderate .23. Comments: MASD- Wound area previously documented as MASD has now progressed to stage 3 pressure injury of coccyx as of 1/15/25. This tracker to be closed and completed, new tracker will be opened. Exacerbated due to increased drainage and incontinence .6. Additional interventions/plans: Dressing treatment Plan Primary Dressing(s) Sodium hypochlorite (dakins) apply once daily and as needed for 30 days: 0.125% dakins Secondary dressing(s) ABD pad apply once daily for 30 days. Plan of care reviewed and addressed Recommendations cleanse with wound cleanser at time of dressing change; offload wound; reposition per facility protocol; turn side to side in bed every 1-2 hours if able. [Wound Care Doctor] here to eval and treat resident. Surgical excisional debridement procedure completed at bedside. Resident tolerated well . Of note: R35's PI now has 85% slough in the wound bed when on 1/29/25 R35's wound bed had 70% granulation and only 20% necrotic tissue, which would indicate a deterioration in the wound. 2/12/25: . stage 3 pressure injury .5a. Length 12.5 cm 5b. Width 3.6cm. 5c. Depth 0.4cm .Tissue Type .6a. Skin 10% 6c. Granulation 50% 6e. Necrotic 50% .7. Drainage b. Serous. 8. Amount of drainage c. moderate .23. Comments: MASD- Wound area previously documented as MASD has now progressed to stage 3 pressure injury of coccyx as of 1/15/25. This tracker to be closed and completed, new tracker will be opened. Improved evidenced by decreased surface area .6. Additional interventions/plans: Dressing treatment Plan Primary Dressing(s) Sodium hypochlorite (dakins) apply once daily and as needed for 30 days: 0.125% dakins Secondary dressing(s) ABD pad apply once daily for 30 days. Plan of care reviewed and addressed Recommendations cleanse with wound cleanser at time of dressing change; offload wound; reposition per facility protocol; turn side to side in bed every 1-2 hours if able. [Wound Care Doctor] here to eval and treat resident. Surgical excisional debridement procedure completed at bedside. Resident tolerated well . (Of note: the PI assessment indicates 110% as evidenced by Skin 10% 6c. Granulation 50% 6e. Necrotic 50%. Assessments should never account for more than 100%. Facility staff did not clarify the characteristics of the wound bed or that the percentage was over 100%) The following documentation is regarding R35's second pressure injury that developed that was found as an unstageable. 1/15/25: . 2. Pressure injury acquired b. In house. 2a. Date acquired 1/15/25. 3. Location: Right thigh (rear) type: pressure. Length 0.5cm Width 1.1cm Depth 0.1cm Stage 3 .5. Tissue Type .5d. Slough 100% .6. Drainage: b. Serous. 7. Amount of drainage: b. light .6. Additional interventions/plans: [Wound Care MD] here to eval and treat. Treatment plan as follows: Cleanse with wound cleanser at time of dressing change, apply silver sulfadizine 3x/week and PRN for 30 days. Surgical excisional debridement completed at bedside via [MD name]. Removal of necrotic tissue and established margins of viable tissue. Resident tolerated procedure well . (Of note: R35's left thigh wound was found as a stage 3, on 1/15/25 which is the same day that R35's MASD deteriorated to a stage 3 pressure injury. The wound has 100% slough which would indicate the wound is an unstageable Pressure injury.) 1/22/25: . 3. Location: Left thigh (front) type: pressure. Length 6.5cm Width 6.3cm Depth 0.1cm Stage 3 .5. Tissue Type .5a. Skin 60% 5c. Granulation 40% 5d. Slough 20% .6. Drainage: b. Serous. 7. Amount of drainage: d. heavy .20. Comments: .Previously documented as right posterior thigh in error. Area is LEFT posterior thigh/buttock .6. Additional interventions/plans: [Wound Care MD] here to eval and treat. Treatment plan as follows: Cleanse with wound cleanser at time of dressing change, apply silver sulfadizine 3x/week and PRN for 30 days. Surgical excisional debridement completed at bedside via [MD name]. Removal of necrotic tissue and established margins of viable tissue. Resident tolerated procedure well . (Of note: Of note: the PI assessment indicates 120% as evidenced by Skin 60% 5c. Granulation 40% 5d. Slough 20%. Facility staff did not clarify the characteristics of the wound bed or that the percentage was over 100%.) 1/29/25: . 3. Location: Left thigh (rear) type: pressure. Length 2.5cm Width 2.2cm Depth 0.1cm Stage 3 .5. Tissue Type .5c. Granulation 30% .5e. Necrotic 70% .6. Drainage: b. Serous. 7. Amount of drainage: c. moderate .20. Comments: .Previously documented as right posterior thigh in error. Area is LEFT posterior thigh/buttock. Improved as evidenced by decrease in surface area .6. Additional interventions/plans: [Wound Care MD] here to eval and treat resident. Treatment plan as follows: Dressing Treatment Plan Primary Dressing(s) Sodium hypochlorite solution (dakins) apply once daily and as needed for 30 days: 0.125% dakins Secondary Dressing(s) ABD pad apply once daily for 30 days. Peri wound treatment Zinc ointment apply once daily and as needed for 30 days. Surgical excisional debridement completed at bedside via [MD name]. Removal of necrotic tissue and established margins of viable tissue. Resident tolerated procedure well . 2/5/25: . 3. Location: Left thigh (rear) type: pressure. Length 0.4cm Width 1.7cm Depth 0.1cm Stage 3 .5. Tissue Type .5d. Slough 100% .6. Drainage: b. Serous. 7. Amount of drainage: b. Light .20. Comments: .Previously documented as right posterior thigh in error. Area is LEFT posterior thigh/ buttock. Improved as evidenced by decrease in surface area .6. Additional interventions/plans: [Wound Care MD] here to eval and treat resident. Treatment plan as follows: Dressing Treatment Plan Primary Dressing(s) Sodium hypochlorite solution (dakins) apply once daily and as needed for 30 days: 0.125% dakins Secondary Dressing(s) ABD pad apply once daily for 30 days. Peri wound treatment Zinc ointment apply once daily and as needed for 30 days. Surgical excisional debridement completed at bedside via [MD name]. Removal of necrotic tissue and established margins of viable tissue. Resident tolerated procedure well . 2/12/25: 3. Location: Left thigh (rear) type: pressure. Length 1.4cm Width 1.6cm Depth 0.1cm Stage 3 .5. Tissue Type .5c. Granulation 100% .6. Drainage: b. Serous. 7. Amount of drainage: b. Light .20. Comments: .Previously documented as right posterior thigh in error. Area is LEFT posterior thigh/buttock. Improved as evidenced by decrease in surface area .6. Additional interventions/plans: [Wound Care MD] here to eval and treat resident. Treatment plan as follows: Dressing Treatment Plan Primary Dressing(s) Sodium hypochlorite solution (dakins) apply once daily and as needed for 30 days: 0.125% dakins Secondary Dressing(s) ABD pad apply once daily for 30 days. Peri wound treatment Zinc ointment apply once daily and as needed for 30 days. Surgical excisional debridement completed at bedside via [MD name]. Removal of necrotic tissue and established margins of viable tissue. Resident tolerated procedure well . R35's CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) documentation from 1/1/25-2/17/25 is as follows: Task: Did you turn and reposition? Response: Yes-58 answers out of 144 opportunities. It is important to note that the facility failed to document on 86 repositioning opportunities. B&B: Bowel and Bladder Elimination: January and February-bowel movements tracked and documented daily on most shifts. Urination is not tracked at all. On 2/18/25 at 9:30 AM, Surveyor observed wound care with DON B (Director of Nursing) and LPN EE (Licensed Practical Nurse). Surveyor observed R35 lying in bed with a low air loss mattress. R35 had several layers underneath her; the bed had a fitted sheet, a lift sheet, a cloth chux pad, an incontinence brief, and a purple incontinence liner that was saturated with urine. Wound care was completed by LPN EE, and a new incontinence brief and purple incontinence liner was reapplied. On 2/19/25 at 9:48 AM, Surveyor interviewed LPN EE. Surveyor asked LPN EE how she can ensure that the Dakin solution isn't touching the healthy skin after changing R35's dressing, LPN EE stated that she tries to form it to the wound. Surveyor asked how they know that it stays in place when being changed or repositioned, LPN EE stated that staff have to make sure it is in place, but she is not sure. It is important to note, that during wound care, the Dakin-soaked gauze was lying flat on the wound bed, not tucked into the wound, and was coming in contact with healthy skin. According to the National Library of Medicine< https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK507916/> Due to its properties as an acid-based compound, Dakin solution can be corrosive to healthy tissue, especially at higher concentrations. An oil-based ointment such as petroleum jelly can be applied to surrounding healthy tissue to reduce skin irritation and prevent the debridement of viable tissue. Dakin solution also loses its antiseptic properties rapidly after application due to the instability of the compound. Therefore, gauze sponges soaked with Dakin used to pack necrotic wounds must be frequently changed. It is usually applied twice daily to lightly to moderately exudative wounds and twice daily for highly exudative or contaminated wounds. On 2/19/25 at 8:58 AM, Surveyor interviewed CNA E. Surveyor asked CNA E how often R35 is checked and changed, CNA E stated every 2 hours and is repositioned every 2 hours from side to side. Surveyor asked CNA E if they document repositioning and toileting, CNA E stated that they don't. Surveyor asked how many layers should be under a resident on an air mattress, CNA E reported that there should be a fitted sheet, a draw sheet, and a brief. Surveyor asked if she has ever noticed R35 to have a fitted sheet, draw sheet, cloth chux pad, purple liner, and an incontinence brief on, CNA E yes. Surveyor asked if she reported it to anyone, CNA E stated no and that she just removes it. On 2/18/25 at 3:23 PM, Surveyor interviewed CNA MM. Surveyor asked how many layers are under R35, CNA MM reported a sheet, a draw sheet, a cloth chux pad, and a purple incontinence liner. Surveyor asked how often is R35 repositioned, CNA MM stated every 2 hours and that they document it and they used to have a paper they filled out, but now it's added to her tasks. On 2/18/25 at 1:48 PM, Surveyor interviewed DON B. Surveyor asked DON B how many layers should be under a resident that is on an air mattress, DON B stated that it should be just the sheet. Surveyor asked DON B if he observed all of the layers under R35, DON B stated yes. Surveyor asked DON B if they have identified the root cause of R35's coccyx wound worsening. DON B provided documentation from the wound MD indicating it was due to R35 refusing offloading and due to incontinence. DON B reported that they obtained an order for a wedge cushion on 1/24/25 and implemented that, as well as adding turn every 2 hours to R35's CNA tasks. DON B also stated that he added Bowel and Bladder documentation to the CNA task list. Surveyor reviewed CNA documentation with DON B. Surveyor asked DON B how he knows that R35 is being repositioned every 2 hours, if the task only asks if she was repositioned, DON B stated he wasn't sure. Surveyor also reviewed R35's bowel and bladder documentation and pointed out that the CNAs were not documenting R35's incontinence episodes. R35 was at risk for PI development and developed two stage 3 facility acquired PIs. The facility failed to follow standards of practice as evidenced by observations of multiple layers between R35 and the air mattress, failed to provide education and/or risks vs benefits when R35 declined repositioning, did not ensure consistent documentation of repositioning, and failed to ensure treatments were applied to only the pressure injury wound bed. The facility's failure to implement preventive interventions for residents at risk for PIs, failure to provide education and/or risks vs. benefits when a resident declined repositioning, failure to complete weekly assessment per standard of practice, and failure to correctly apply prescribed treatments created a reasonable likelihood for serious harm, thus leading to a finding of immediate jeopardy. The facility removed the jeopardy on 2/28/25, when it completed the following: *Both residents remains at the center and care plan regarding pressure injury reviewed and updated. In house residents with pressure injuries have the potential to be affected. Skin sweep completed 2/28/2025. On 2/28/2025 Director of nursing or designee implemented re-education with nursing staff (CNAs and licensed nurses) on Pressure Injury and Non-Pressure Injury policy and Use of Support Surface policy. This education included: o the need to ensure care plan is followed including managing moisture and incontinence including not using multiple layers with air mattresses o If cares/treatments are refused to notify licensed nurse/DON/designee and education provided on risks and benefits to resident or responsible party, notify MD and update care plan o obtaining Periwound treatment in order from MDs o Wound assessments including measurements and ensuring surface area adds up to 100% of assess Identified education will occur prior to start of next scheduled shift. On 2/28/2025, facility reviewed their Pressure Injury and Non-Pressure Injury and Use of Support Surface policies. No changes were required to policies. On 2/28/25, DON/designee also verified that residents with pressure injuries have accurate assessment of pressure injuries, including physician orders for treatment and dressing changes that are completed per MD order. Interdisciplinary review completed of care plans for residents with pressure injuries and a visual audit was completed by Director of Nursing or designee to ensure care planned interventions for pressure injury healing and prevention are in place. DON/designee to complete random observation (audit) of dressing changes per MD order with periwound treatment, if warranted, and cares/treatment to ensure dressing changes completed per MD order, interventions to promote healing including no multiple layers on air mattresses, and ensure proper documentation of refusal of skin care and treatment. Audits will also include Pressure injury weekly documentation to ensure accurate and complete, and CNA task documentation on if cares accepted and documented per care plan. Audits will be completed daily x 7 days. These audits will then continue on varying shifts three times per week for 4 additional weeks then 2 times per week for 4 additional weeks. Results of audits will be presented to facility QAPI committee for review and any recommendations. Ad hoc QAPI meeting held on 2/28/2025 to review this plan Example 2: R44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include type 2 diabetes mellitus, pressure ulcer of sacral region, stage 2, anxiety disorder, and panic disorder. R44's most recent MDS dated [DATE] states that R44 has a BIMS of 15 out of 15, indicating that R44 is cognitively intact. The MDS also indicates that R44 is dependent on staff for bed mobility, transfers, bathing, and dressing her lower body. R44's care plan initiated on 12/17/24 states: .Focus: The resident has a stage 2 pressure ulcer to coccyx or potential for pressure ulcer development r/t Hx (history) of ulcers, decreased mobility. Goal: The resident's pressure ulcer will show signs of healing and remain free from infection by/through review date. Interventions: *Monitor dressing to ensure it is intact and adhering. Report lose [sic] dressing to treatment nurse. *Monitor nutritional status. Serve diet as ordered, monitor intake and record. *Monitor/ document/ report PRN any changes in skin status: appearance, color, wound healing, s/sx of infection, wound size .* The resident requires air flotation pressure redistribution device. * Weekly treatment documentation to include measurement of each area of skin breakdown's width, length, depth, type of tissue, and exudate . R44's documentation on facility's Pressure Injury (PI) Weekly Tracker is as follows: 12/16/24: .Location: Coccyx Type: Pressure. Length 0.9cm Width 0.8cm Depth 0.3cm stage 2. 5. Tissue type: 5c. Granulation 50% 5d. Slough 50%. 6. Drainage b. Serous 7. Amount of drainage b. Light .B. Plan/ Treatment .6. Turn and reposition every 2 hours . R44 was admitted with a PI that was 50% slough, which would indicate it's at least a stage 3. 12/18/24: . Length 1.1cm Width 0.8cm Depth 0.3cm stage 3. 5. Tissue type: 5c. Granulation 20% 5d. Slough 80%. 6. Drainage b. Serous 7. Amount of drainage c. moderate .B. Plan/ Treatment .6. Turn and reposition every 2 hours- Cleanse with wound cleanse [sic], apply medihoney to wound bed, cover with bordered foam dressing. Skin prep to periwound daily x 30 days. Surgical excisional debridement performed to remove necrotic tissue and establish viable tissue . It is important to note that there were no wound measurements from 12/18/24-1/8/25, during which time R44's PI increased in size. 1/8/25: .Length 4.1cm Width 0.5cm Depth 0.1cm stage 3. 5. Tissue type: 5a. Skin 50% 5c. Granulation 10% 5d. Slough 40%. 6. Drainage b. Serous 7. Amount of drainage c. moderate .B. Plan/Treatment .6. Turn and reposition every 2 hours- Cleanse with wound cleanse [sic], app[TRUNCATED]
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Resident Rights (Tag F0550)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation and interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that residents were ensured a dignified existe...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation and interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that residents were ensured a dignified existence and self-determination for 1 of 20 sampled residents (R316). R316 voiced concerns that he had no clothes to wear and was forced to wear a hospital gown all the time, including to the dining room for meals. As evidenced by: The Facility policy titled, Resident Rights, dated 9/2017, states, in part: Purpose: To ensure that resident rights are respected, protected, and promoted . Procedure: Residents will be treated with respect and dignity and care for each resident will be given in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his/her quality of life and recognizes each resident's individuality . 38. All facility staff are to encourage residents to exercise their rights by providing choices . R316 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R316's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicates, in part: a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, indicating R316 is cognitively intact. On 2/16/25 at 12:26 PM, Surveyor observed R316 dressed in only a hospital gown and gripper socks in the dining room. R316 had a blanket wrapped around his shoulders. R316 was seated at the dining room table eating lunch. On 2/17/25 at 12:42 PM, Surveyor observed R316 dressed only in a hospital gown and gripper socks in the dining room. R316 had a blanket wrapped around his head, another blanket wrapped around his shoulders, and a third blanket on his lap. R316 was seated at the dining room table eating lunch. On 2/17/25 at 4:34 PM, Surveyor interviewed R316 who indicated that he prefers not to go to the dining room in a hospital gown. R316 stated that he also has an assisted living apartment, where all of his clothes are, and that he only has one pair of clothes with him. R316 stated that he tries to keep his one set of clothes for when he has to go out to appointments. R316 indicated that he does not have anyone in the area who can bring his clothes to him from his assisted living apartment. Surveyor asked R316 if anyone in the community had offered for him to wear extra clothes from the lost and found. R316 stated they had not. Surveyor asked R316 if he would be willing to wear some extra clothes from the community until he could get his own from his apartment. R316 stated yes, he would really appreciate not having to wear a hospital gown. R316 stated he was not here to win a beauty contest, but that he feels exposed in the hospital gown, and they are not very warm. On 2/18/25 at 9:29 AM, Surveyor interviewed SW D (Social Worker) about R316 not having any clothes to wear. SW D indicated that R316's family lives in another state, and he didn't have anyone to bring him clothes from his apartment. SW D stated he had contacted R316's assisted living manager, and a staff member from the assisted living would be bringing R316 some of his clothes and other belongings, hopefully by the end of the week. Surveyor asked SW D if the community laundry had some extra clothes in the lost and found that could be offered to R316. SW D indicated that they do have extra clothes and he would try to get him some today. On 2/18/25 at 10:16 AM, Surveyor observed R316 in his room in a t-shirt and sweat pants. R316 stated that it felt good to be wearing regular clothes, even if they were not his own. Surveyor asked R316 if staff had ever offered him clothes before today. R316 stated no, today was the first time they had ever offered him clothes to wear.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0561 (Tag F0561)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not promote and facilitate resident self-determination throu...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility did not promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choices and preferences for 1 (R44) of 20 sampled residents and 1 (R15) of 12 supplemental residents reviewed. R44 and R15 voiced concerns with receiving eggs almost every day for breakfast. R44 and R15 indicated they shared this concern, and it has not been corrected. Evidenced by: The facility policy, Resident Rights, dated 7/22, states, in part; .17. The resident has the right and this facility promotes and support the right to make choices about aspects of his/her life in the facility that are significant to the resident . Example 1 R44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R44's most recent MDS dated [DATE] states that R44 has a BIMS of 15 out of 15, indicating that R44 is cognitively intact. R44's most recent Nutritional Assessment, states, in part; .preferences: see tray card . On 2/19/25 at 8:33 AM, R44 indicated most mornings she receives scrambled eggs. R44 indicated she has voiced her preferences and concern with the kitchen. R44 indicated she continues to receive scrambled eggs. Surveyor reviewed meal ticket. R44's meal ticket does not include any preferences or not wanting scrambled eggs. Example 2: R15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R15's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with a date of 1/21/25, indicates, in part: a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 out of 15, indicating R15 is cognitively intact. R15's Care Plan, dated 7/15/24, states in part: Focus: At risk for nutritional status change related to history of unintended weight loss . Intervention: Honor food preferences .: On 2/16/25 at 10:36 AM, Surveyor interviewed R15, who indicated that the food was sometimes good, and sometimes not so good, but that she hates scrambled eggs and gets them every morning. On 2/17/25 at 8:34 AM, Surveyor observed R15 in the dining room. R15 was served scrambled eggs for breakfast by BOM H (Business Office Manger). Surveyor overheard R15 saying I hate scrambled eggs. R15 was not offered a substitution. Surveyor observed R15 eating the toast and oatmeal, then returning to her room, leaving the scrambled eggs untouched. On 2/17/25 at 9:52 AM, Surveyor interviewed BOM H and asked her if the residents could get a substitution if they didn't like something that was served. BOM H stated that they do accommodate substitutions. Surveyor asked BOM H if she had offered R15 a substitution when she stated that she hated scrambled eggs. BOM H stated that she did not hear R15 say that. Surveyor asked BOM H what the process was to have a resident's dietary preferences printed on their meal ticket. BOM H stated that the dietary manager meets with the residents when they first move in to the community and then periodically after that. On 2/18/25 and again on 2/19/25, Surveyor reviewed R15's meal ticket in the dining room. R15's meal ticket stated both times: Regular cut meat into bite size, large portions, built up fork, built up knife, built up spoon. No amendment was made to indicated that R15 did not like scrambled eggs. On 2/19/25 at 10:57 AM, [NAME] OO indicated the kitchen will add resident preferences to their meal tickets at admission and as needed. [NAME] OO indicated she will let DM (Dietary Manager) know about the need to update R44 and R15's meal tickets. On 2/19/25 at 1:20 PM Nursing Home Administrator A (NHA) indicated understanding regarding the need to update R44 and R15's meal tickets to include preferences. The facility did not promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choices and preferences.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that all incidents involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that all incidents involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment are reported immediately, but no later than 2 hours after the incident, if the events involve abuse to the appropriate agencies for 2 of 2 resident-to-resident abuse allegations (R50 and R53). R50 has a history of being verbally aggressive towards others. R50 was verbally aggressive towards R53 and made him cry on 2/10/25. The UC J (Unit clerk), NHA A (Nursing Home Administrator), DON B (Director of Nursing), and RN I (Registered Nurse), were aware of this incident, but it was not reported to the state agency. Evidenced by: Facility policy, titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation dated 2/2018 with a revision date of 7/15/22, states, in part: Policy: It is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse . Definitions: Verbal Abuse means the use of oral, written or gestured communications or sounds that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms to residents or their families, or within their hearing distance regardless of their age, ability to comprehend, or disability . VII. Reporting/Response. A. The facility will have written procedures that include: 1. Reporting of all alleged violations to the Administrator, state agency, adult protective services, and to all other required agencies . within specified timeframes: a. Immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or b. Not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury . B. The Administrator will follow up with government agencies to report the results of the investigation when final within 5 working days of the incident, as required by state agencies . R50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Unspecified Dementia, Unspecified Severity, Without Behavioral Disturbance, Psychotic Disturbance, Mood Disturbance, and Anxiety. R50's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/28/24, indicates R50 has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15, indicating R50 is cognitively intact. (Of note, R50's comprehensive care plan does not include her Dementia diagnosis or include anything about aggressive behaviors, triggers, or interventions.) R50's Progress Notes include, in part, the following: On 2/10/25 at 8:55 AM, Type: Behavior Note: Resident came into Bird Room while another resident was actively enjoying a tv program. [Resident Name] went to the tv and changed the channel, without regard for the other resident. The other resident politely went to the unit clerk and requested for the channel to be put back to what he was watching. As the Unit Clerk was changing the channel, [Resident Name] started yelling at the unit clerk and the other resident. She stated I don't need anybody else in here disturbing me while I do my work! I don't watch tv to watch tv! and I can't have games on the tv in here because they are distracting! You can go somewhere else to watch tv! BUT NOT HERE in MY workspace! Unit clerk reminded [Resident Name] that the bird room is a public space. [Resident Name] stated they could go somewhere else other than the Bird Room . [Resident Name] continued to argue over the unit clerk and the other resident got very upset and said he would just leave and go elsewhere and was crying. This writer reminded [Resident Name] that the Bird room is for all residents and that she should be respectful to others. [Resident Name] ignored this writer as if she wasn't there. Note: yesterday, this same resident was in the bird room and [Resident Name] came to the room and started blaring music from her cell phone to force him to leave the area. When asked to turn the music down, [Resident Name] pretended she wasn't being talked to . [Resident Name] was again reminded that she had other tv options and other places she could choose to do her work but could not control the tv when someone else was already watching it and that it's everyone's room, not just for her. This note will be given to ED (Executive Director). On 2/19/25 at 10:26 AM, Surveyor interviewed RN I (Registered Nurse) about the verbal altercation between R50 and R53. (RN I is the author of above progress note). RN I stated that R53 was sitting in the bird room watching TV when R50 came in and changed the channel. RN I stated that R53 politely asked R50 to change it back, but R50 ignored him, so R53 left the room and talked to UC J (Unit Clerk) to have the channel changed back. R53 told UC J that R50 was giving him a hard time. UC J went to the bird room with R53 and attempted to change the channel. R50 started screaming saying we don't have the right to disrupt her in her workspace during her work time. R50 said she was not to be disturbed and there are plenty of other places for people to watch TV. UC J politely told R50 that was a space for everyone to use. R50 started screaming louder and repeating this is my workspace. At this point, R53 became emotional, stating I was not trying to hurt anyone or upset anyone I was just trying to watch TV, and then R53 left the room in tears. RN I indicated both her and UC J have told R50 that she needs to be more respectful of others, but she ignores them. RN I indicated that the previous day, R50 blasted her music on her cell phone in order to get R53 to leave. R50 again ignored them. RN I stated that R53 will still go in the bird room to enjoy the birds and watch TV, but only if R50 is not in there. RN I indicated that R53 is afraid to go in there now, as is several other residents and family members. Surveyor asked RN I if this would be considered resident-to-resident verbal abuse. RN I stated that yes she would consider it verbal abuse, because R50 just kept screaming at R53 until he started crying. Surveyor asked who she reports abuse allegations to. RN I stated she reported this incident to NHA A and that she printed out her progress behavior note for him to review. On 2/19/25 at 12:37 PM, Surveyor interviewed UC J via telephone. Surveyor asked UC J about R50's behaviors. UC J indicated that there have been several incidents in the bird room with other residents. UC J stated that a few days prior, she noticed R50 and another resident sitting in the bird room with the lights off. When UC J went to turn the lights on for the other resident, R50 started screaming at them. UC J indicated it has been an ongoing issue. Surveyor asked UC J about the event that happened between R50 and R53 on 2/10/25. UC J stated R53 was in the bird room watching the game channel when R50 came in and changed the channel. R53 began screaming profanity at R53 and told him he could go somewhere else to watch TV. UC J indicated R53 became very upset when he came out and told her what had happened, that he was crying and visibly upset. Surveyor asked UC J if she would consider this resident-to-resident verbal abuse. UC J stated yes, she would. Surveyor asked UC J who she reports allegations of abuse to. UC J stated she reported this incident to NHA A. On 2/19/25 at 1:06 PM, Surveyor interviewed DON B (Director of Nursing) and discussed the incident between R50 and R53. Surveyor asked DON B if this incident would be considered resident-to-resident verbal abuse. DON B stated no, he did not consider it to be verbal abuse. Surveyor reviewed the progress note with DON B and asked if one resident screaming at another resident and making them cry would be verbal abuse. DON B stated it was his understanding that R50 was not yelling at R53 directly but was just yelling in general. On 2/19/25 at 1:39 PM, Surveyor interviewed NHA A (Nursing Home Administrator) and asked about the incident that occurred between R50 and R53 on 2/10/25. Surveyor asked NHA A if this incident could be considered resident-to resident verbal abuse. NHA A indicated no because it was his understanding that her outbursts are more directed at staff members and not at other residents. Surveyor pointed out that the incident progress note as well as several staff interviews indicated that R53 was visibly upset and crying after the incident. Surveyor asked NHA A what the process was for determining if a resident-to-resident altercation was reportable. NHA A replied he would follow the CMS resident-to-resident diagram, and did not feel that it rose to the level of a reportable incident. Of note, the Resident-to-Resident Altercation Flowchart states in part: resident to resident altercation occurs - did resident act willfully? Willful means the individual's act was deliberate- not inadvertent or accidental regardless of whether or not the individual intended to inflict injury or harm. (A resident whose involuntary movements cause him/her to accidentally strike another has not committed a willful act.) if the no option is selected, do not report. Document an immediate assessment and lack of willful intent. Assess-care plan- intervene. Goal: Prevent reoccurrence and keep other residents safe. Also, the flowchart states Use of this flowchart must provide for immediate reporting (see F609) or the facility must clearly document the rationale for not reporting. The facility failed to recognize and report a resident-to-resident altercation, despite several staff members having knowledge of the incident. The facility failed to recognize a resident's verbally aggressive behaviors and negative interactions with other residents as abuse and failed to report this incident to the state agency within the appropriate timeframes. Cross Reference: F609 & F744
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Investigate Abuse (Tag F0610)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that in response to allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitatio...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that in response to allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, all alleged violations were thoroughly investigated for 2 of 2 Residents (R50 and R53) reviewed for abuse. On 2/10/25, the facility became aware of an allegation of resident-to-resident abuse between R50 and R53 and did not conduct a thorough investigation. Evidenced by: Facility policy, titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation dated 2/2018 with a revision date of 7/15/22, states, in part: Policy: It is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse . Definitions: Verbal Abuse means the use of oral, written or gestured communications or sounds that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms to residents or their families, or within their hearing distance regardless of their age, ability to comprehend, or disability . Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: . b. Establish policies and procedures to investigate any such allegations . V. Investigation of Alleged Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation: A. An immediate investigation is warranted when allegation or suspicion of abuse, neglect or exploitation, or reports of abuse, neglect, or exploitation occur . 4. Identifying and interviewing all involved persons, including the alleged victim, alleged perpetrator, witnesses, and others who might have knowledge of the allegation. 5. Focusing the investigation on determining if abuse, neglect, exploitation, and/or mistreatment has occurred, the extent, and cause, and 6. Providing complete and thorough documentation of the investigation: VII. Reporting/Response. 4. Taking all necessary actions as a result if the investigation, which may include, but are not limited to the following: a. Analyzing the occurrence to determine why abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property or exploitation occurred, and what changes may be needed to prevent further occurrences . R50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Unspecified Dementia, Unspecified Severity, Without Behavioral Disturbance, Psychotic Disturbance, Mood Disturbance, and Anxiety. R50's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/28/24, indicates R50 has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15, indicating R50 is cognitively intact. R50's Progress Notes include, in part, the following: On 2/10/25 at 8:55 AM, Type: Behavior Note: Resident came into Bird Room while another resident was actively enjoying a tv program. [Resident Name] went to the tv and changed the channel, without regard for the other resident. The other resident politely went to the unit clerk and requested for the channel to be put back to what he was watching. As the Unit Clerk was changing the channel, [Resident Name] started yelling at the unit clerk and the other resident. She stated I don't need anybody else in here disturbing me while I do my work! I don't watch tv to watch tv! and I can't have games on the tv in here because they are distracting! You can go somewhere else to watch tv! BUT NOT HERE in MY workspace! Unit clerk reminded [Resident Name] that the bird room is a public space. [Resident Name] stated they could go somewhere else other than the Bird Room . [Resident Name] continued to argue over the unit clerk and the other resident got very upset and said he would just leave and go elsewhere and was crying. This writer reminded [Resident Name] that the Bird room is for all residents and that she should be respectful to others. [Resident Name] ignored this writer as if she wasn't there. Note: yesterday, this same resident was in the bird room and [Resident Name] came to the room and started blaring music from her cell phone to force him to leave the area. When asked to turn the music down, [Resident Name] pretended she wasn't being talked to . [Resident Name] was again reminded that she had other tv options and other places she could choose to do her work but could not control the tv when someone else was already watching it and that it's everyone's room, not just for her. This note will be given to ED (Executive Director). On 2/10/25 the facility became aware of this incident of resident-to-resident verbal abuse. The facility did not initiate or complete a thorough investigation of an alleged violation of abuse. On 2/19/25 at 10:26 AM, Surveyor interviewed RN I (Registered Nurse) about the verbal altercation between R50 and R53. (RN I is the author of above progress note). RN I stated that R53 was sitting in the bird room watching TV when R50 came in and changed the channel. RN I stated that R53 politely asked R50 to change it back, but R50 ignored him, so R53 left the room and talked to UC J (Unit Clerk) to have the channel changed back. R53 told UC J that R50 was giving him a hard time. UC J went to the bird room with R53 and attempted to change the channel. R50 started screaming saying we don't have the right to disrupt her in her workspace during her work time. R50 said she was not to be disturbed and there are plenty of other places for people to watch TV. UC J politely told R50 that was a space for everyone to use. R50 started screaming louder and repeating this is my workspace. At this point, R53 became emotional, stating I was not trying to hurt anyone or upset anyone I was just trying to watch TV, and then R53 left the room in tears. RN I indicated both her and UC J have told R50 that she needs to be more respectful of others, but she ignores them. RN I indicated that the previous day, R50 blasted her music on her cell phone in order to get R53 to leave. R50 again ignored them. RN I stated that R53 will still go in the bird room to enjoy the birds and watch TV, but only if R50 is not in there. RN I indicated that R53 is afraid to go in there now, as is several other residents and family members. Surveyor asked RN I if this would be considered resident-to-resident verbal abuse. RN I stated that yes she would consider it verbal abuse, because R50 just kept screaming at R53 until he started crying. Surveyor asked who she reports abuse allegations to. RN I stated she reported this incident to NHA A and that she printed out her progress behavior note for him to review. (of note, RN I was aware of another Resident to resident incident the day prior.) On 2/19/25 at 1:06 PM, Surveyor interviewed DON B (Director of Nursing) and discussed the incident between R50 and R53. Surveyor asked DON B if this incident would be considered resident-to-resident verbal abuse. DON B stated no, he did not consider it to be verbal abuse. Surveyor reviewed the progress note with DON B and asked if one resident screaming at another resident and making them cry would be verbal abuse. DON B stated it was his understanding that R50 was not yelling at R53 directly but was just yelling in general. Surveyor asked DON B if there had been an investigation into this incident. DON B stated that himself and the NHA A had reviewed the documentation, but that no formal investigation was completed. On 2/19/25 at 1:39 PM, Surveyor interviewed NHA A (Nursing Home Administrator) and asked about the incident that occurred between R50 and R53. Surveyor asked NHA A if this incident could be considered resident-to resident verbal abuse. NHA A indicated no because it was his understanding that her outbursts are more directed at staff members and not at other residents. Surveyor pointed out that the incident progress note as well as several staff interviews indicated that R53 was visibly upset and crying after the incident. Surveyor asked NHA A if he conducted a thorough investigation into the events that occurred on 2/10/25. NHA A replied that he had not had any complaints from other residents specifically regarding to this incident. Surveyor asked NHA A if he had followed-up with either resident after the incident. NHA A stated that he talks to R53 pretty much every day, but that there was no official follow-up on this incident. NHA A stated he could certainly follow-up with R53 to see if he had any concerns about this situation, but that he already talks to him everyday and would think if he had an issue he would have already brought it up. The facility did not follow their policy to complete a thorough investigation, as no other residents were interviewed to identify any further abuse by R50. No statements were taken from R50 or R53/ No staff witness statements were obtained for this incident. Cross Reference: F609 & F744
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility did not develop and implement a Comprehensive Resident-Centered Care P...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility did not develop and implement a Comprehensive Resident-Centered Care Plan for 1 of 20 total sampled residents (R23). R23's medical record indicates he has schizoaffective disorder and behaviors. R23's comprehensive care plan does not include a care plan with goals or interventions that included monitoring and supervision, related to inappropriate behaviors. This is evidenced by: The facility's policy titled Comprehensive Care Plan, dated 9/23/22, states in part: It is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that includes measurable objectives, and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the residents comprehensive care plan. The care planning process will include an assessment of the resident's strengths and needs and will incorporate the resident's personal and cultural preferences in developing goals of care. The comprehensive care plan will describe, at a minimum, the following: a. The services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being . f. Resident specific interventions that reflect the resident's needs and preferences and align with the resident's cultural identity, as indicated. The comprehensive care plan will be reviewed and revised as appropriate by the interdisciplinary team after each comprehensive and quarter MDS assessment, and as needed with changes in condition. The comprehensive care plan will include measurable objectives and timeframes to meet the resident's needs .Staff responsible for carrying out interventions specified in the care plan will be notified of their roles and responsibilities for carrying out the interventions, initially and when changes are made. R23 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include schizoaffective disorder (a mental health condition including schizophrenia and mood disorder symptoms), severe obsessive-compulsive disorder (excessive thoughts that lead to repetitive behaviors) and anxiety. R23's Brief Interview for Mental Status on 1/5/25 has a score of 15, indicating R23 is cognitively intact. R23's annual MDS (Minimum Data Set) comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] states in part: R23 has verbal behavioral symptoms directed toward others and other behavioral symptoms not directed toward others. Care areas triggered for care planning include psychosocial well-being and behavioral symptoms. R23's comprehensive care plan, printed 2/19/25, does not include psychosocial well-being or behavioral symptoms. R23's physician orders for February 2025 do not include behavior monitoring orders. R23's behavioral health assessment, dated 1/21/25, states in part: He does have some paranoid delusions at baseline. R23's CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) documentation for January 2025 indicates 23 shifts for the month where R23 had behavioral symptoms of yelling/screaming, repeated movements, abusive language, and/or rejection of cares. R23's CNA documentation for February 2025 indicates 10 shifts where R23 had behavioral symptoms of yelling/screaming, repeated movements, abusive language, and/or rejection of cares. On 2/18/25 at 9:25 AM, Surveyor interviewed MT M (Med Tech, a CNA that can administer medications) regarding R23's behaviors. MT M indicates R23 will get upset, swear, and lash out verbally. MT M indicated when he becomes behavioral, MT M will try to calm him down by talking to him. MT M did not indicate other interventions that may help when R23 becomes behavioral. On 2/18/25 at 9:27 AM, Surveyor interviewed CNA U regarding R23's behaviors. CNA U indicated R23 will get upset and say nasty things, but then he will apologize later. CNA U indicated when R23 become behavioral, CNA U will try to redirect him or get another staff member to come help. CNA U did not indicate other interventions that may help when R23 becomes behavioral. On 2/18/25 at 9:58 AM, Surveyor interviewed RN V (Registered Nurse) regarding R23's behaviors. RN V indicated R23 will become manic, will start calling people on the phone and demand phone numbers, will yell at people, and becomes fixated on a topic. RN V indicated calling R23's sister to speak with him will help. RN V indicated if a resident had behaviors, the care plan would show what the behaviors are and what interventions to use. On 2/19/25 at 12:58 PM, Surveyor interviewed DON B (Director of Nursing) regarding R23's behaviors. DON B indicated if a resident has behaviors, there would be an order in the physician orders for behavior monitoring every shift. DON B indicated if a resident has behaviors, the residents care plan should be updated to include that information. Surveyor informed DON B that R23 does not have a care plan that includes triggers, goals, or interventions for his behaviors. DON B indicated it would be difficult for staff to know what R23's behaviors are and what de-escalation interventions are effective for R23 without a care plan. DON B indicated R23 should have a care plan for his behaviors that includes interventions but does not.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0744 (Tag F0744)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dem...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia receives the appropriate treatment and services to attain or maintain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 2 residents (R50) reviewed for dementia care out of a total sample of 20 residents. R50 has a diagnosis of dementia. R50 has a history of exhibiting verbally aggressive and socially inappropriate/disruptive behavior towards staff and other residents. The facility staff did not provide person-centered services to maintain R50's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Evidenced by: The facility policy titled Dementia Care, dated 4/23/24, states, in part: Policy: It is the policy of this facility to provide the appropriate treatment and services for residents who display signs of, or are diagnosed with dementia, to meet his or her highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being . Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1. The facility will assess, develop, and implement care plans through an interdisciplinary team (IDT) approach that includes the resident, their family, and/or resident representative, to the extent possible . 2. The care plan goals will be achievable, and the facility will provide resources necessary for the resident to be successful in meeting their goals. 3. The care plan interventions will relate to each resident's individual symptomology. 4. Care and services will be person-centered and reflect each resident's individual goals while maximizing the resident's dignity . 7. The care plan goals and interventions will be monitored on an ongoing basis for effectiveness and will be reviewed/revised as necessary. 8. Appropriate referrals will be made if current interventions are ineffective . (i.e. physician, mental health provider, licensed counselor, pharmacist, social worker) . R50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Unspecified Dementia, Unspecified Severity, Without Behavioral Disturbance, Psychotic Disturbance, Mood Disturbance, and Anxiety. R50's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/28/24, indicates R50 has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15, indicating R50 is cognitively intact. Of note, R50's comprehensive care plan does not include her Dementia diagnosis or include goals or interventions for her care. R50's Behavior Monitoring Report for January 2025, states in part: Monitor - Behavioral Symptoms. Symptoms are to be monitored every shift, three times per day. On 1/4/25 at 12:11 PM, R50's Behavior Documentation states 3= Yelling and Screaming and 8 = Abusive Language. A Y is indicated that R50 has exhibited this behavior before. Ten times the behavior charting is left blank. All other days and shifts are marked as 12 = None of the behaviors occurred. R50's Behavior Monitoring Report for February 2025, states in part: Monitor - Behavioral Symptoms. Symptoms are to be monitored every shift, three times per day. On 2/14/25 at 12:32 PM, R50's Behavior Documentation states 8 = Abusive Language. A Y is indicated that R50 has exhibited this behavior before. Eleven times the behavior charting is left blank. All other days and shifts are marked as 12 = None of the behaviors occurred. The State Operations Manual, Appendix PP, states in part: Behavioral or psychological expressions are occasionally related to the brain disease in dementia; however, they may also be caused or exacerbated by environmental triggers. Such expressions or indications of distress often represent a person's attempt to communicate an unmet need, discomfort, or thoughts that they can no longer articulate. On 2/17/25 at 10:02 AM, Surveyor introduced self to R50. R50 was seated at a table in the common room (called the bird room due to the aviary being in that room). R50 had papers spread on the table in front of her and was using an electronic tablet. R50 did not return Surveyor's greeting or answer any questions. On 2/17/25 at 2:27 PM, Surveyor interviewed CNA W (Certified Nursing Assistant) about R50's behaviors. CNA W indicated that R50 sits in the bird room all day and calls it her office, hoards items such as toilet paper rolls, refuses all showers and cares, and wears the same clothes all the time. CNA W stated that R50 swears at staff every day. Surveyor asked CNA W what interventions were in place for R50's behaviors. CNA W stated that she just doesn't engage R50 when she gets like that. Surveyor asked CNA W if any of R50's behaviors were on her CNA [NAME]. CNA W indicated there was nothing on the [NAME] about R50's behaviors. Surveyor asked CNA W how R50's behaviors were being monitored. CNA W indicated they are charted in PCC (Point Click Care) online charting system. Surveyor asked CNA W what it meant if there were blanks in the charting. CNA W indicated blanks meant that someone forgot to do the task or forgot to chart on it. On 2/18/25 at 9:34 AM, Surveyor interviewed RN P (Registered Nurse) about R50's behaviors. RN P indicated that R50 refuses to do anything including take medications and allow vital sign monitoring. RN P said that R50 often just tells her to go away. RN P indicated that R50 watches news all day in the bird room, and if any other resident comes into the bird room, R50 will yell at them to get out, or she will turn the volume up extremely loud to try to force the other resident to leave. On 2/18/25 at 10:05 AM, Surveyor interviewed LPN X (Licensed Practical Nurse) about R50's behaviors. LPN X stated that R50 is very uncooperative, and they are unable to give her the care that she needs. LPN X indicated she has seen R50 completely take over the bird room, and she yells at other residents when she comes in there. LPN X stated that R50 will become really aggressive if anyone tries to open the window shades when she wants them closed. LPN X stated that some of the other residents used to go into the bird room to play cards, watch TV, or attend bible study, but now they don't feel comfortable going in there anymore. Surveyor asked LPN X what interventions were in place for R50's behaviors. LPN X stated that they just give R50 her space. On 2/18/25 at 3:41 PM, Surveyor interviewed CNA/MT Y (Certified Nursing Assistant/Medication Technician) about R50's behaviors. MT Y indicated that R50 completely believes that the bird room is her office. MT Y stated R50 will yell at anyone who attempts to change the channel, and that people used to hang out in there and they don't anymore because of R50's behavior. MT Y indicated that R50 wants her to just leave her medications next to her and not take them right away. MT Y stated that if she does not do that, R50 will shake her fist at her and yell at her to go away. Surveyor asked MT Y what interventions were in place for R50's behaviors. MT Y stated she just gives her space and walks away, because if she doesn't, R50 will just continue yelling and yelling until you leave her alone. On 2/19/25 at 10:26 AM, Surveyor interviewed RN I (Registered Nurse) about R50's behaviors. RN I indicated there have been many days that R50 has screamed at her over the TV channel or the lights being on when she wants them off. RN I stated that R50 will target certain residents and yell at them if she thinks they are taking her things out of the bird room. RN I stated that R50 has also chased family members out of the room by screaming at them, and that R50 screamed and cussed at a volunteer who came to do bible study in the bird room. RN I indicated bible study and other activities had to be moved to another area of the community, because other residents are intimidated by R50. RN I stated that R50 also refuses all nursing care. Surveyor asked RN I what interventions are in place for R50's behaviors. RN I stated that they just give her space because she is not agreeable to anything. RN I stated that the more they try to talk to R50, the more she ignores them like they don't exist, or she explodes to screaming and yelling. RN I indicated that this behavior has been going on for months. On 2/19/25 at 1:06 PM, Surveyor interviewed DON B (Director of Nursing) about R50's behaviors. Surveyor asked if a resident has behaviors, should they be on their care plan. DON B stated yes, behaviors should be listed on the care plan. Surveyor asked DON B what kind of behaviors R50 was having. DON B indicated that R50 acts like the bird room is her office. DON B stated that R50 knows it is not her office but she feels that she is entitle to use it as her office. DON B stated that R50 has never been physically aggressive but can become very argumentative with staff and other residents. Surveyor asked DON B if a resident has a diagnosis of dementia, should that be on their care plan, along with triggers and interventions for behaviors. DON B stated yes, dementia should be on R50's care plan. Surveyor asked DON B if R50's dementia diagnosis, her behaviors, and any interventions were not on R50's care plan, how would a new employee know how to care for R50. DON B indicated that it would be hard for a new employee to know how to de-escalate R50's behaviors. DON B stated it was his expectation that R50's dementia including her behaviors and interventions should be in place on R50's care plan and CNA [NAME]. The facility failed to assess, develop, and implement an individualized care plan to ensure that R50's dementia care needs were met. Cross Reference: F609 & F610.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0584)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure each resident had a safe, clean, comfortable, and...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure each resident had a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 1 of 20 sampled residents (R316) and 6 of 12 supplemental residents ((R15, R11, R30, R18, R26, R42). R316, R42, R15, R11, R30, R18, and R26 indicated that the dining room was very cold, and they were wearing jackets or wrapped in blankets to stay warm. Resident Council meeting minutes dated 1/23/25, indicated the facility was aware that residents had concerns of it being too cold in the dining room. Evidenced by: Facility policy, entitled Safe and Homelike Environment Policy, dated 6/16/22, includes in part . Definitions: Comfortable and safe temperature levels means that the ambient temperature should be in a relatively narrow range that minimizes residents' susceptibility to loss of body heat and risk of hypothermia/hyperthermia and is comfortable for the residents . Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines . 7. The facility will maintain comfortable and safe temperature levels. a. The facility will strive to keep the temperature in common resident areas between 71 and 81 degrees Fahrenheit . Example 1 R316 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R316's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicates, in part: a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, indicating R316 is cognitively intact. On 2/16/25 at 12:26 PM, Surveyor observed R316 dressed in only a hospital gown and gripper socks in the dining room. R316 had a blanket wrapped around his shoulders. R316 was seated at the dining room table eating lunch. On 2/17/25 at 12:42 PM, Surveyor observed R316 dressed only in a hospital gown and gripper socks in the dining room. R316 had a blanket wrapped around his head, another blanket wrapped around his shoulders, and a third blanket on his lap. R316 was seated at the dining room table eating lunch. On 2/18/25 at 8:18 AM, Surveyor observed R316 again dressed only in a hospital gown and gripper socks and huddled in blankets in the dining room. Resident stated, it is definitely cold in here today. Example 2 R11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R11's MDS dated [DATE] indicates, in part: a BIMS score of 15 out of 15, indicating R11 is cognitively intact. On 2/18/25 at 8:19 AM, Surveyor observed R11 with a blanket around her shoulders in the dining room. R11 answered yes when asked if she was cold. Example 3 R42 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R42's MDS dated [DATE] indicates, in part: a BIMS score of 11 out of 15, indicating mild cognitive impairment. On 2/18/25 at 8:20 AM, Surveyor observed R42 sitting at the dining room table wearing a jacket. R42 told Surveyor he was wearing the jacket because he was trying to keep warm. Example 4 R30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R30's MDS dated [DATE] indicates, in part: a BIMS score of 10 out of 15, indicating a moderate cognitive impairment. On 2/18/25 at 8:21 AM, Surveyor observed R30 sitting at the dining room table wearing a jacket. Surveyor asked R30 if he was cold. R30 stated you bet I'm cold. Example 5 R18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R18's MDS dated [DATE] indicates, in part: a BIMS score of 10 out of 15, indicating a moderate cognitive impairment. On 2/18/25 at 8:22 AM, Surveyor observed R18 sitting at the dining room table wearing a jacket. Surveyor asked R18 if he was cold. R18 stated yes I am cold, especially since I just got out of the shower. Example 6 R26 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R26's MDS dated [DATE] indicates, in part: a BIMS score of 9 out of 15, indicating a moderate cognitive impairment. On 2/18/25 at 8:24 AM, Surveyor observed R26 wrapped in a blanket while sitting at a table in the dining room. Surveyor asked R26 if she was cold. R26 replied, oh yes, it is cold in here. On 2/18/25 at 8:25 AM, Surveyor observed PTA C (Physical Therapy Assistant) enter the dining room and visibly shudder. PTA C said, brr its cold in here. On 2/18/25 at 8:25 AM, Surveyor took a reading of the air temperature in the dining room, which read 56.8 degrees Fahrenheit. On 2/18/25 at 8:26 AM, Surveyor interviewed NHA A (Nursing Home Administrator) in the dining room and showed him the temperature reading. NHA A stated he would check the thermostats and get the boilers going to get it warmer in here. NHA A stated it would take about an hour to kick in. On 2/18/25 at 10:12 AM, Surveyor took a reading of the air temperature in the dining room, which read 62.2 degrees Fahrenheit. On 2/18/25 at 12:32 PM, Surveyor interviewed PTA C about the temperature in the dining room this morning. PTA C stated that she thought it was too cold in the dining room for the residents to be in there this morning, and that sometimes when it is really cold, they would keep the residents in their rooms to eat. On 2/18/25 at 12:36 PM, Surveyor took a reading of the air temperature in the dining room, which read 64.4 degrees Fahrenheit. On 2/18/25 at 12:37 PM, Surveyor interviewed NHA A, and asked how long the temperature in the dining room had been an issue. NHA A indicated that there is only a concern when the temperature reaches below zero, in which case they take additional measures such as closing the blinds to keep the heat in. Surveyor pointed out that many of the blinds in the dining room were up on this day and throughout the survey period. NHA A stated that they also will provide the residents with blankets and sweaters if they ask. Surveyor shared with NHA A that this was a concern that was brought up at resident council in January and asked why it had not been corrected. NHA A indicated that the facility is in need of two brand new boilers, and they needed an opportunity for the weather to get warmer in order to install them. NHA A stated that they had contracted with a company to come out and repack the ceiling with more insulation to maintain the heat. This was originally scheduled for 2/14/25 but was canceled and rescheduled for 2/21/25. NHA A stated that they had shut the dining room in January when it was very cold, but that they like to respect the resident's choice to eat in the dining room. Surveyor pointed out to NHA A that 56.8 degrees Fahrenheit was well below the acceptable air temperature range for the facility, and asked if he would consider that to be a homelike environment. NHA A stated that he believes they do everything they can to maintain a homelike environment in the facility, but they respect the resident's choice above all else. On 2/18/25 at 1:45 PM, Surveyor interviewed Maintenance G. Surveyor asked if he monitors the ambient temperature in the dining room. Maintenance G stated that he did not. Surveyor asked Maintenance G if 56.8 degrees Fahrenheit was an acceptable dining room temperature. Maintenance G stated no it was not.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0679 (Tag F0679)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an ongoing program to support resident choice...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an ongoing program to support resident choice of activities, based on the comprehensive assessment and care plan and the preferences of each resident for 2 (R38 and R58) of 20 total sampled Residents and 2 (R33 and R25) of 12 supplemental residents who reside on D Hallway. Surveyor observed R38, R58, R33 and R25 from 2/16/25-2/18/25. The facility did not provide residents with meaningful activities. Evidenced by: The facility policy, Activities, dated 7/11/22, states, in part; .2. Activities will be designed with the intent to: a. Enhance the resident's sense of well-being, belonging, and usefulness. b. Promote or enhance physical activity. c. Promote or enhance cognition. d. Promote or enhance emotional health. e. Promote self-esteem, dignity, pleasure, comfort, education, creativity, success and independence. f. Reflect resident's interests and age. g. Reflect cultural and religious interests of the residents. h. Reflect choices of the residents .9. Special considerations will be made for developing meaningful activities for residents with dementia and/or special needs . Example 1 R38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, Dementia with psychotic disturbance, restless leg syndrome, essential tremor, and osteoarthritis (type of arthritis that occurs when flexible tissue at the ends of bones wears down). R38's most recent MDS (Minimum Data Set) with ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 1/21/25, indicates R38 has a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 08 indicating R38 is moderately cognitively impaired. R38 has an activated power of attorney. R38's Comprehensive Care Plan, states, in part; .While in the facility, R38 states that it's important that she engage in activities that are meaningful to her preferences/interest 10/22/24 .I am catholic faith and would like to participate in religious services/practices such as attending in-house services and self-directing my own prayer. I enjoy socializing with others, spending time with family/friends, keeping up with the morning news, country music, baking/cooking, being around children, balloon ball, and watching TV/movies. I also like to sit/relax and socialize outdoors; I prefer warm weather. I used to enjoy making cards, coloring, and parties/socials. It is important for me to engage in my favorite activities .I would benefit from accommodations from physical limitations by having assistance to/from programs. I would benefit from accommodations from visual limitations by having large print materials. I would like pet visits, if available, and I enjoy dogs .I would like to vote, if able . Surveyor reviewed R38's activity participation documentation from December 2024 and January 2025. There are 21 days with no activity participation documentation. Surveyor observed R38 on 2/16/25. R38 was not offered and did not participate in any activities. R38's activity documentation for 2/16/25 was blank. On 2/16/25 at 2:18 PM, R38 indicated the facility is short staffed and this concerns R38. R38 indicated she would like to be offered different things to do. Surveyor observed R38 on 2/17/25. Surveyor did not observe R38 participating in any activities. Surveyor reviewed R38's activity documentation for 2/17/25, R38 participated in watching a movie for the entire day. Surveyor observed R38 on 2/18/25. At 10:35 AM, R38 went and got her nails done and returned to D hallway shortly after. R38 did not participate in any other activities. Example 2 R33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, adjustment disorder with depressed mood, unspecified hearing loss, and dementia with anxiety. R33 most recent MDS (Minimum Data Set) with ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 12/4/24, indicates R33 has a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 00 indicating R33 is severely cognitively impaired. R33 has an activated power of attorney. R33's Comprehensive Care Plan, states, in part; .it is important that she engage in activities that are meaningful to her preferences/interest .I enjoy looking through magazines/the newspaper, baking/cooking, observing programs, attending social/special events, watching TV/movies, socializing with others, doing word search puzzles, and playing cards-dirty clubs. I use to enjoy the news, working in my flower garden, walking to my son's house, and traveling. I also like to sit/relax in nature and outdoors when the weather is nice. I prefer hot/warm and sunny weather. It is important for me to engage in my favorite activities 9/7/21 . Surveyor reviewed R33's activity documentation from December 2024 and January 2025. There are 22 days with no activity participation documented. Surveyor observed R33 on 2/16/25. R33 was not offered and did not participate in any activities. R33's activity documentation for 2/16/25 was blank. Surveyor observed R33 on 2/17/25. Surveyor did not observe R33 participating in any activities. Surveyor reviewed R38's activity documentation for 2/17/25, R33 participated in watching a movie for the entire day. Surveyor observed R33 on 2/18/25. R33 did not participate in any activities in the morning. At 1:55 PM, activity staff assisted R33 in attending the baking activity in the activity room until 3 PM. R33 did not participate in any other activities. Example 3 R25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses including dementia. R25's most recent MDS (Minimum Data Set) with ARD (Assessment Reference date) of 12/12/24, indicates R25 has a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 03 indicating R25 is severely cognitively impaired. R25 has an activated power of attorney. R25's Comprehensive Care Plan, states, in part; .it is important that she engages in activities that are meaningful to her .I prefer to keep to myself. I do enjoy reading the newspaper and magazines, resting/laying down, listening to all kinds of music, socializing with others, doing word search puzzles and watching TV/movies. I also like to sit/relax, socials, and nature watch outdoors when the weather is nice; I prefer warm/cool weather. I use to enjoy bingo, sewing/knitting, and having a vegetable garden. It is important for me to engage in my favorite activities .12/13/23 .I would benefit from accommodations from cognitive limitations by having reminders for programs, verbal/physical prompts, single step direction, and assistance to/from programs .I would benefit from accommodations from hearing limitations by having placement near the speaker/leader of the program .I would benefit from accommodations from physical limitations by having assistance to/from program . Surveyor reviewed R25's activity participation documentation for December 2024 and January 2025. There are 22 days with no activity participation documented. Surveyor observed R25 on 2/16/25. R25 was not offered and did not participate in any activities. R25's activity documentation for 2/16/25 was blank. Surveyor observed R25 on 2/17/25 and 2/18/25. Surveyor did not observe R25 participate in any activities. Surveyor reviewed R25's activity participation documentation. R25 listened to the radio. Example 4 R58 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses including cognitive communication deficit, weakness, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, and mild cognitive impairment. R58's most recent MDS (Minimum Data Set) with ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 1/6/25, indicates R58 has a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 08 indicating R58 is moderately cognitively impaired. R58 has an activated power of attorney. R58's Comprehensive Care Plan, states, in part; .it's important that she engage in activities that are meaningful to her preferences/interest .I am of the catholic faith and would like to participate in religious services such as self-directing my own prayer and possibly attending in-house services. I enjoy socializing with others, coloring, keeping up with the local news, listening to classic country music, reading all kinds of materials, car rides and watching TV. I use to enjoy gardening/plants. I also like to sit/relax outdoors, and I prefer warm weather. It is important for me to engage in my favorite activities 1/6/25 . Surveyor observed R58 on 2/16/25. R58 was not offered and did not participate in any activities. R58's activity documentation for 2/16/25 was blank. On 2/16/25 at 2:57 PM, R58 asked what there was to do. Staff indicated R58 could go to the bathroom. R58 indicated that's something to do and she could go to the bathroom. Surveyor asked R58 if she would like some activities and things to do. R58 indicated she would like that. On 2/17/25 at 2:18 PM, CNA BB (Certified Nursing Assistant) indicated there is often one CNA down D hallway and with the population they serve down D hallway it gets very chaotic. There are not activity aides or any activities during the weekends. CNA BB indicated the activities are not geared for residents with dementia. CNA BB indicated she has voiced these concerns, and nothing had changed. CNA BB indicated more activities and activities that are tailored for residents with dementia would benefit everyone down D hallway. On 2/18/25 at 9:45 AM, CNA KK indicated there are not a lot of activities offered for residents on D hallway. CNA KK indicated the activities are not for residents with dementia. On 2/18/25 at 10:43 AM, Surveyor asked LPN X (Licensed Practical Nurse) about activities for the residents on D hallway. Surveyor asked about activities specifically for residents with dementia. LPN X indicated she was unsure what was offered for the residents on D hallway. LPN X indicated, They all look so bored. On 2/19/25 at 9:13 AM, LES NN (Life Enrichment Specialist) indicated she always encourages her staff to include the residents on D hallway for all activities. LES NN indicated she will stress more to her staff about encouraging all residents to attend activities. LES NN indicated she will follow up with her staff regarding weekend activities as well. LES NN indicated she has some good staff on the team now and there has been improvements. LES NN indicated she tries to keep the bigger activities scheduled on the same days and there are items down D hallway so the residents can use items such as coloring pages, books, and puzzles. Surveyor asked LES NN how do you ensure residents that are not independent with activities still have meaningful activities and are included? LES NN indicated she always asks residents at resident council about activities and what they would like to see on the calendar. LES NN indicated they will pair up residents and try to bring as many residents as possible down to activities. LES NN indicated the resident might prefer to watch and observe an activity and it is important for them to still be invited and included in that activity. LES NN indicated staff will reapproach the resident as well if they at first decline joining the activity. LES NN indicated they do the best they can for including the residents that have dementia and may need more support. LES NN indicated R38, R58, and R33 can be independent with activities. LES NN indicated R25 is more difficult in finding activities that she may enjoy participating in. Surveyor shared with LES NN observations regarding residents down D hallway and activities. LES NN indicated CNA's can assist with activities as well and assist in setting up residents with activities. Surveyor indicated if there is one CNA down D hallway there might not be a lot of time to do activities. LES NN stated yes that is true. LES NN indicated she will provide education to her weekend staff and that Wednesday and Thursday are better down D hallway. On 2/19/25 at 12:30 PM CNA M indicated R38, R58, R33, and R25 are not independent with their activities. CNA M indicated the residents need assistance and support from staff for activities. On 2/19/25 at 12:36 PM, CNA Z indicated R38, R58, R33, and R25 need assistance with activities. CNA Z indicated they are not independent or able to structure their own activities. On 2/19/25 at 1:20 PM, NHA A (Nursing Home Administrator) indicated understanding regarding the concern with the lack of activities for the residents on D hallway. The facility failed to provide an on going program to support resident choice of activities, based on the comprehensive assessment and care plan and the preferences of each resident who resides at the facility.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0725 (Tag F0725)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Example 6 On 2/16/25 Surveyor observed lunch starting down D hallway at 12:10 PM. Most residents down D hallway eat in the commo...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Example 6 On 2/16/25 Surveyor observed lunch starting down D hallway at 12:10 PM. Most residents down D hallway eat in the common/living room area down D hallway. Surveyor observed no staff in common area on two separate times during lunch time. Surveyor observed no staff from 12:20PM-12:32PM and again at 12:40PM-12:51PM. Multiple residents require supervision and assistance during meals. Surveyor observed R38 struggling with her meal. Surveyor observed R38 attempting to raise her spoon up five times and was unable to get her spoon all the way up to her mouth. R38 asked Surveyor if Surveyor could help her eat her meal. Example 7 On 2/16/25 at 12:30 PM, CNA Z (certified nursing assistant) indicated it is usually just one staff down D hall on the weekends. CNA Z indicated it depends on the weekend if there is an activity aid at the facility. CNA Z indicated there are times she can not get all the tasks done due to the staffing ratio. CNA Z indicated there is supposed to be a float CNA that works all hallways. CNA Z indicated staff is not quick to respond when asking for help over the walkie talkie. CNA Z indicated there are times that the float CNA is helping someone else, on break, or the position didn't get filled that day. Example 8 R38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R38's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] indicates R38 has a brief interview of mental status score of 08 out of 15, indicating R38 is moderately cognitively impaired. On 2/16/25 at 2:18 PM, R38 indicated she needs assistance with eating meals. Surveyor asked R38 if the CNA often got pulled to answer call lights or help others during mealtime? R38 stated yes. Surveyor asked if R38 often waits for assistance to eat? R38 indicated yes. R38 indicated staffing is a concern and there is often not enough staff down R38's hallway. Example 9 On 2/16/25 at 2:45 PM, CNA AA indicated it is common that there is only one CNA down D hallway. CNA AA indicated staffing is a concern. Example 10: On 2/17/25 at 2:18 PM, CNA BB (certified nursing assistant) indicated staffing is a concern. CNA BB indicated there is often one CNA down D hallway and with the population they serve down D hallway it gets very chaotic. There are not activity aides or any activities during the weekends. CNA BB indicated the activities are not geared for residents with dementia. CNA BB indicated she has voiced these concerns, and nothing changed. CNA BB indicated more activities would benefit everyone down D hallway. CNA BB indicated there are times she can't get to everyone at the end of the shift to assist with repositioning and going to the bathroom. CNA BB indicated the float is not usually down D hallway and recently two minors were working on A hallway alone and neither of them can use the Hoyer lift. CNA BB indicated she is often very rushed, and the residents can feel that. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that sufficient nursing staff was provided to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident (R). This has the potential to affect all 68 residents residing at the facility. Surveyors entered on the weekend due to the facility triggering for low weekend staffing. NHA A (Nursing Home Administrator) indicated the schedule is based on the census and hours per patient day (HPPD), which does not take into consideration the acuity of the facility's resident population. Residents in Resident Council voiced concerns that staff take too long to answer call lights and meal trays on the halls are not passed timely due to staff not being available. R56 voiced concerns about long wait times when wanting to get up. Staff stated there are care items they cannot complete for residents due to having low staffing. This is evidenced by: The Facility Assessment Tool, date 1/3/25, states in part: Staffing plan: RN/LPN/LVN (Registered Nurse / Licensed Practical Nurse / Licensed Vocational Nurse) 1.5:40 RN/LPN Days, 1.5:40 RN/LPN Evenings. Direct care staff 1:13 ratio CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) Days, 1:13 ratio CNA Evenings, 1:26 ration CNA Nights. Staff Hours on Average: RN Hours: .5, CNA Hours: 1.6, Total Nursing Staff Hours: 3.0 HPPD (Hours per patient day) is used to measure the amount of time for care each resident receives in a 24 hour period. HPPD is calculated using the following equation: total nursing hours divided by the number of residents. Example 1 On Sunday, February 16, 2025, surveyors entered the building for the facility's annual recertification survey. Surveyors entered on a weekend due to the facility triggering for low weekend staffing. Example 2 On 2/19/25 at 8:39 AM, Surveyor interviewed NHA A regarding the facility staffing. NHA A indicated he actively participates in the scheduling of the facility. NHA A stated the facility staffs according to the census, if the census goes up then the facility staffs more CNAs and if the census goes down then the facility will schedule less CNAs. NHA A stated the ideal schedule would be 3.0 HPPD. NHA A indicated during the all-staff monthly meetings, the staff have voiced it would be beneficial to have more staff scheduled. NHA indicated during resident council, residents have voiced concerns about low staffing levels. The facility census postings were reviewed for the dates 2/2/25 through 2/19/25 for HPPD, as follows: 2/2/25 was 2.6 HPPD (Sunday) 2/3/25 was 2.6 HPPD 2/4/25 was 2.5 HPPD 2/5/25 was 2.8 HPPD 2/6/25 was 2.6 HPPD 2/7/25 was 2.7 HPPD 2/8/25 was 2.9 HPPD (Saturday) 2/9/25 was 2.9 HPPD (Sunday) 2/10/25 was 2.5 HPPD 2/11/25 was 2.5 HPPD 2/12/25 was 3.2 HPPD 2/13/25 was 2.7 HPPD 2/14/25 was 2.3 HPPD 2/15/25 was 2.4 HPPD (Saturday) 2/16/25 was 2.7 HPPD (Sunday) 2/17/25 was 2.7 HPPD 2/18/25 was 2.6 HPPD 2/19/25 was 2.8 HPPD Of note, only one day (2/12/25) was at or above 3.0 HPPD. Example 3 Resident council minutes were reviewed. November 2024 resident council minutes state in part: 2nd shift can sometimes take too long to answer a call light . December 2024 resident council minute state in part: Residents voiced concerns for Hall trays not being passed timely, resulting in food that isn't as warm as they'd like. Resident stated that they understand that sometimes someone needs assistance when trays come but that someone should help to avoid food temps. On 2/19/25 at 12:30 PM, Surveyor interviewed NHA A regarding resident council concerns about staffing. NHA A stated residents in resident council have mentioned concerns with staffing but it is not a continual common theme. Example 4 R56 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including arthritis (joint inflammation). R56's comprehensive assessment, dated 1/5/25, indicates R56 is dependent on staff for toileting, personal hygiene, and requires 2 staff for transferring between surfaces. On 2/16/25 at 12:13 PM, Surveyor interviewed R56 about call light response time. R56 stated when he turns on his call light, staff will come in and turn it off and tell him they need to get a second person. R56 states it will take them 20 minutes or longer before they come back. R56 states he will sometimes turn his light back on if it takes too long for them to return. On 2/19/25 at 9:34 AM, Surveyor interviewed CNA E (certified nursing assistant) regarding call light response times. CNA E indicated call lights will be on for longer than 20 minutes at times. CNA E indicated she will go into a resident's room, turn off the call light without meeting the resident's needs and tell the resident she will be back. Example 5 On 2/19/25 at 9:20 AM, Surveyor interviewed LPN N (Licensed Practical Nurse) regarding staffing. LPN N indicated she does not perform any CNA duties when working because she does not have time to help. On 2/19/25 at 9:23 AM, Surveyor interviewed MT M (Med Tech, a CNA that can administer medications) regarding staffing. MT M indicated she does not perform any CNA duties when she is working as a med tech but will occasionally answer a resident's call light if she has time. On 2/19/25 at 9:24 AM, Surveyor interviewed CNA E regarding staffing. CNA E is employed full time at the facility. Surveyor asked CNA E to think about the last 2 weeks she has worked and to recall a time when she received help from ancillary staff or the nurses. CNA E indicated she has not received help from other staff or the nurses when completing her CNA duties. CNA E indicated she cannot complete all the resident's care, due to low staffing. CNA E indicated she cannot always get to things like resident's oral care. CNA E indicated resident call light response time can be longer than 20 minutes at times due to low staffing. On 2/19/25 at 9:38 AM, Surveyor interviewed CNA CC regarding staffing. CNA CC indicated he can't get it all done when questioned about completing resident care. CNA CC indicated he cannot complete things like range of motion or oral care for residents. CNA CC states he must prioritize things like changing incontinent residents over providing oral care. On 2/19/25 at 12:30 PM, Surveyor interviewed NHA A regarding low staffing. NHA A indicated multiple department heads are [NAME] certified and can work as a CNA but it is rarely required. Example 11: R12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include, in part: Muscle Weakness, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Emphysema Unspecified (a chronic lung disease that makes it difficult to breathe), Major Depressive Disorder, and Chronic Pain. R12's MDS (Minimum Data Set) with a target date of 2/10/25, indicates, in part: BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score of 14 out of 15, indicating R12 is cognitively intact. R12's Care Plan, dated 1/16/25, states, in part: Focus: ADL (Activities of Daily Living) self-care deficit as evidenced by: total assist related to: progressive generalized weakness, severe . Goal: Will receive assistance to meet ADL needs . Interventions: Bed Mobility: Assist of 2 for bed mobility able to reposition self slightly . Dressing: Requires extensive assist of 1 staff to dress . Locomotion: requires total assist with locomotion . Personal Hygiene: Assist of 1 to wash own face and hands . Toileting: Assist of 2 using bedside commode and use of shower sling for transfers. Generally continent of bowel, occasionally incontinent of bladder . Transfer: Assist of 2 staff and use of mechanical lift . On 2/16/25 at 10:18 AM, Surveyor interviewed R12, who stated, the people work very hard here, but they don't have enough staff. R12 indicated that he has had to wait a long time for staff assistance. R12 stated that last night he waited a half hour to use the commode, but that sometimes it is over an hour. R12 indicated that the staff have to use the Hoyer lift to get him to the commode, and that sometimes they can't find anyone to help, so that he has to wait longer. R12 stated that it was very difficult to wait that long to go to the bathroom, and that he felt, like I'm not very important. Example 12: R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include, in part: Alzheimer's Disease with late onset, Dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere, moderate, and Major Depressive Disorder. R1's admission MDS with a date of 11/25/24, indicates, in part: a BIMS score of 9 out of 15, indicating R1 has moderate cognitive impairment. R1's Care Plan, dated 2/15/21, states, in part: Focus: ADL self-care deficit related to: physical limitation, dementia with behaviors . Goal: Will be clean, dressed and well groomed daily to promote dignity and psychosocial wellbeing . Interventions: Ambulation: [Resident Name] is non ambulatory at this time . Bathing: [Resident Name] requires extensive to near total assist with showering . Bed Mobility: [Resident Name] requires extensive assist of 1 staff with repositioning . Dressing: [Resident Name] requires extensive assist of 1 staff for dressing . Eating: [Resident Name] requires set up assist with meals . Locomotion: [Resident Name] requires extensive assist of 1 staff for locomotion in wheelchair . Personal Hygiene: [Resident Name] requires extensive assist with personal hygiene . Toileting: [Resident Name] requires extensive assist of one staff with toileting and is frequently incontinent of bladder and bowel . Transfers: [Resident Name] requires extensive assist with transfers with 2 staff and use of EZ-stand . On 2/16/25 at 10:52 AM, Surveyor interviewed R1, who stated that sometimes she has to wait an hour for her call light to be answered. R1 stated that it makes her feel anxious to wait that long to have to use the bathroom, as she is unable to do it by herself. Example 13: R316 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include, in part: Weakness, Hemiplegia (a neurological condition that causes paralysis or weakness on one side of the body), Hemiparesis (one-sided muscle weakness), and Personal History of Urinary Tract Infections. R316's Care Plan, dated 2/12/25, states, in part: Focus: ADL self-care deficit as evidenced by: right sided deficit/weakness related to: stroke . Goal: Will improve current level of function in ADLs (activities of daily living) through the review date . Interventions: Ambulation/Locomotion: with device wheelchair . Bathing/Showering: Assist of 1 staff . Personal Hygiene: Assist of 1 staff . Toileting: Assist of 1 staff . Transfer: Assist of 2. Transfer with EZ-stand for all transfers with 2 staff . On 2/16/25 at 10:28 AM, Surveyor interviewed R316, who indicated that usually he has to wait a long time for his call light to be answered. R316 stated that he requires assistance from staff to get up and then to lay back down, and that he had to wait a half hour this morning. R316 stated he felt extremely frustrated having to just sit and wait, and that at times they are so short staffed he has to wait an hour. Example 14: R15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that include, in part: Seizures, Contracture of Muscles, multiple sites, Weakness, and Unspecified Atrial Fibrillation (a common heart rhythm disorder where the upper chambers of the heartbeat irregularly and rapidly). R15's admission MDS with a date of 1/21/25, indicates, in part: a BIMS score of 13 out of 15, indicating R15 is cognitively intact. R15's Care Plan, dated 7/15/24, states, in part: Focus: ADL self-care deficit as evidenced by: need for staff assist . Goal: Will improve current level of function in ADLs through the review date . Interventions: Ambulation/Locomotion: [Resident Name] is non-ambulatory at this time. Requires extensive assist with locomotion . Bathing/Showering: Assist of 1 to shower or bathe . Bed Mobility: Requires assist of 1 for bed mobility . Dressing: Assist of 1 for dressing . Personal Hygiene: Assist of 1 to set up and encourage her to wash her own face and hands . Toileting: Assist of 1 for toileting. Continent of both bowel and bladder with occasional episodes of bladder incontinence . Transfer: Transfer with 1 staff, walker and gait belt . On 2/16/25 at 10:36 AM, Surveyor interviewed R15, who indicated that call lights are not answered right away, sometimes she has to wait because the staff are busy. R15 indicated she did not know how long she has to wait, but at times it can be quite long. R15 stated she is angry when she has to wait to go to the bathroom and she sometimes has accidents if she has to wait too long due to their not being enough staff. Example 15: On 2/16/25 at 2:13 PM, Surveyor interviewed Staff Member F, who wished to remain anonymous. Staff Member F told Surveyor that she does not feel like there is enough staff to meet the residents needs. Staff Member F stated that sometimes she is scheduled to work A wing by herself with over 20 residents to care for, and that she doesn't feel like that is safe. Staff Member F indicated that when they are short staffed, they are not able to get resident's showers completed, do oral cares, or toilet and reposition every two hours. Staff Member F stated that this happens frequently. Example 16: On 2/18/25 at 10:57 AM, Surveyor interviewed CNA E who stated that they are short staffed a couple times a week, mostly on PM shift. CNA E stated that when they don't have enough staff they can't get to toileting or repositioning the residents frequently enough. Cross Reference: F686
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not maintain a safe and sanitary environment in which food is prepared, stored, and distributed. This has the potential to affect a...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not maintain a safe and sanitary environment in which food is prepared, stored, and distributed. This has the potential to affect all 68 residents who reside at the facility. Surveyor observed dietary aide without a beard restraint in the kitchen. Surveyor observed garbage cans near the food prep area without lids. Surveyor observed spilled food or drink in the walk-in fridge. Evidenced by: The facility policy, Employee Sanitary Practices- Food and Nutrition Services, dated, 7/27/22, states, in part; .All food and nutrition services employees will practice good personal hygiene and safe food handling procedures .1. Wear hair restraints (hairnet, beard restraint) to prevent hair from contacting exposed food . On 2/16/25 at 9:45 AM, Dietary Manager K (DM) and Surveyor toured the kitchen. Surveyor observed Dietary Aide L (DA) in the kitchen not wearing a beard restraint. Surveyor observed garbage cans near the food prep area without lids. Surveyor observed yellow substance spilled in the walk-in refrigerator. DM K indicated she will ask staff to clean up the spill and it most likely was eggs. On 2/19/25 at 1:20 PM, Nursing Home Administrator A (NHA) indicated he would expect staff to wear a beard restraint when in the kitchen and when handling food. NHA A indicated understanding with the spilled food and need for lids on garbage cans near food and food prep area. The facility failed to maintain a safe and sanitary environment in which food is prepared, stored, and distributed.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observations, interview, and record review the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to h...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interview, and record review the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. This has the potential to affect all 68 residents (R) residing in the facility. The facility's outbreak that started in October 2024 was resolved too early. Facility staff were unaware of their current outbreak and were not following proper source control during the outbreak. Staff surveillance was not complete for staff illnesses and staff returned to work too early from illnesses. This is evidenced by: The facility's policy titled Infection Prevention and Control Program, dated 7/23/24, states in part: This facility has established and maintains an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infections as per accepted national standards and guidelines. The designated Infection Preventionist is responsible for oversight of the program and serves as a leader to our staff on infectious disease, resident room placement, implementing isolation precautions, staff and resident exposures, surveillance, and epidemiological investigations of exposures of infectious diseases. A system of surveillance is utilized for prevention, identifying, reporting, investigating, and controlling infections and communicable diseases for all resident, staff .based upon a facility assessment and accepted national standards. The infection Preventionist serves as the leader in surveillance activities, maintains documentation of incidents, findings and any corrective actions made by the facility . All staff shall use personal protective equipment (PPE) according to established facility policy governing the use of PPE. The facility's policy titled Infection Outbreak Response and Investigation, dated 2/26/23, states in part: Definitions: Outbreak generally refers to the occurrence of more cases of a communicable disease than expected in a given area or among a specific group of people over a particular period of time. If a condition is rare or has serious health implications, an outbreak may involve only one case. The following triggers shall prompt an investigation as to whether an outbreak exists: .A single case of a rare or serious infection (i.e. COVID-19). Implementation of infection control measures: .Symptomatic employees will be screened by the Infection Preventionist, or designee . Transmission-based precautions will be implemented as indicated for the particular organism. Staff should be educated on the mode of transmission of the organism, symptoms of infection and isolation or other special procedures. This includes special environmental infection control measures that are warranted based on the organism and current CDC guidelines. The incubation period, period of contagiousness, and date of most recent case will be used in making the determination that the outbreak is resolved. Example 1 Facility document titled Covid Outbreak Time Log 10/1/24 to 11/17/24, states in part: On 10/2/24, the facility initiated a COVID outbreak. On 11/2/24, R1 tested positive for COVID. On 11/17/24, the facility ended their outbreak status and discontinued universal masking. According to dhs.wisconsin.gov, respiratory outbreaks can be closed after two incubation periods have passed with no new cases being identified. For COVID-19 outbreaks, this is 28 days . Of note, the facility ended their outbreak on day 15. Example 2 On 2/16/24 at 9:20 AM, Surveyors entered the facility. Posted on the front entrance door was a sign titled Attention Visitors. The sign states in part: Attention Visitors We are currently experiencing a COVID outbreak . If you choose to visit during this outbreak, please review the following: .Facemasks should be worn at all times during your visit. On 2/16/25 at 9:30 AM, Surveyor observed DA L (Dietary Aide) delivering a drink cart on the hallway without a mask on. On 2/16/25 at 12:54 PM, Surveyor interviewed DA L regarding the COVID outbreak. During the interview, Surveyor observed DA L did have a mask on. DA L was not wearing the mask appropriately as the mask was below his nose during the interview. DA L indicated he was not aware the facility was in outbreak and that is why he had not been wearing a mask earlier. Surveyor asked DA L if he had education on the correct way to wear a mask and DA L indicated he was aware of the correct way to wear a mask. Surveyor asked DA L if he was wearing the mask correctly and DA L indicated he was not wearing the mask correctly. On 2/16/25 at 9:32 AM, Surveyor observed CNA O (Certified Nursing Assistant) sitting in the center hub of the facility without a mask on. On 2/16/25 at 12:54 PM, Surveyor interviewed CNA O regarding the COVID outbreak. CNA O indicated she should have been wearing a mask earlier but was not. Surveyor observed CNA O during the interview wearing her mask correctly. On 2/16/25 at 11:10 AM, Surveyor interviewed LPN N (Licensed Practical Nurse) regarding COVID outbreak. LPN N indicated the facility was not in outbreak and staff were wearing mask as a precaution. On 2/17/25 at 12:55 PM, Surveyor observed RN P (Registered Nurse) standing in the hallway wearing her mask below her chin while talking to visitors. Surveyor interviewed RN P regarding the correct way to wear a mask. RN P indicated she was not wearing the mask correctly. RN P indicated she believed there had only been one staff member who tested positive for COVID, and it was past 10 days so she is unsure if the facility was still in outbreak. On 2/16/25 at 12:51 PM, DON B (Director of Nursing) indicated the facility had been in COVID outbreak status since 2/4/25. On 2/17/25 at 8:23 AM, Surveyor observed DA Q walk into the dining room from an outside entrance and walk into the kitchen not wearing a mask. When surveyor went to interview DA Q, she had already left the facility. On 2/17/25 at 8:25 AM, Surveyor observed PC R (Pest Control Contractor) walk out of the kitchen, through the dining room where residents were eating breakfast and to the center hub of the facility. PC R was not wearing a mask. Surveyor observed PC R speaking with NHA A (Nursing Home Administrator). Surveyor interviewed PC R regarding not wearing a mask. PC R indicated he was not aware there was a mask mandate in the facility. PC R indicated he did not notice the sign on the front door indicating the facility was in a COVID outbreak. PC R indicated no staff member told him the facility was in outbreak. PC R indicated no staff member asked him to put on a mask. On 2/17/25 at 8:25 AM, Surveyor interviewed NHA A regarding contractors wearing a mask while in the facility. NHA A indicated the facility recommends contractors wear a mask. NHA A indicated there is a sign at the front door stating the facility is in a COVID outbreak. On 2/18/25 at 12:30 PM, Surveyor interviewed DON B regarding the COVID outbreak. DON B indicated staff should be aware of the outbreak and should wear their mask correctly. Example 3 Surveyor reviewed the facility's staff line list for November 2024, December 2024, and January 2025. November 2024 staff line list states in part: 11/19/24 LPN EE (licensed practical nurse) called in with symptoms of fatigue, nausea, emesis, and diarrhea. Return to work date of 11/22/24. Of note, there is no date symptoms resolved. December 2024 staff line list states in part: 12/7/24 HA FF (Hospitality Aide) called in with symptoms of headache, nausea, and emesis. Return to work date of 12/8/24. Of note, there is no date symptoms resolved, and the return-to-work date is 24 hours after GI (gastrointestinal) symptoms. 12/10/24 CNA GG called in with symptoms of nausea, emesis, and diarrhea. Return to work date of 12/11/24. Of note, there is no date symptoms resolved, and the return-to-work date is 24 hours after GI symptoms. 12/16/24 UC J (Unit Clerk) called in with symptoms of myalgia (muscle pain), headache, and sore throat. Of note, there are no testing results listed, and no date symptoms resolved. 12/20/24 HA FF called in with symptoms of emesis. Return to work date of 12/21/24. Of note, there is no date symptoms resolved, and the return-to-work date is 24 hours after GI symptoms. 12/23/24 HA HH called in with symptoms of nausea and emesis. Of note, there is no date symptoms resolved. January 2025 staff line list states in part: 1/2/25 HA FF called in with symptoms of fever, emesis, and diarrhea. Of note, there is no date symptoms resolved. 1/2/25 RN I called in with symptoms of myalgia, headache, sore throat, cough and diarrhea. Of note, there is not testing results listed, and no date symptoms resolved. 1/5/25 CNA DD called in with symptoms of emesis and diarrhea. Of note, there is no date symptoms resolved. 1/7/25 MN II (Maintenance) called in. Return to work date of 1/8/25. Of note, there are no symptoms listed. 1/21/25 HO JJ (Housekeeper) called in with symptoms of fever, headache, sore throat, rhinorrhea (runny nose), and itching. Testing results listed Influenza. Comments section states return to work 1/25/25 if fever free without medication and symptoms improve. Of note, there is no date symptoms resolved. 1/28/25 CNA KK call in with symptom of sore throat. Return to work date 1/7/25 [sic]. Of note, there is no date symptoms resolved. 1/28/25 CNA LL called in with symptoms of nausea, emesis, and diarrhea. Of note, there is no date symptoms resolved. On 2/18/25 at 12:30 PM, Surveyor interviewed IP S (Infection Preventionist) regarding staff surveillance. DON B was also present for the interview. IP S indicated staff should remain out of the facility if they have GI symptoms for 48 hours after symptoms have resolved. IP S indicated without completing the section of when symptoms resolved it is hard to determine if staff returned to work too early. IP S indicated HA FF and CNA GG returned to work too early. IP S indicated COVID testing should be completed if staff have symptoms of COVID and it should be documented on the line listing. IP S indicated RN I and UC J should have had testing completed. IP S indicated MN II should have had documented symptoms when he called in. IP S indicated the staff line listing should be filled out completely and was not.
Nov 2024 4 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Resident Rights (Tag F0550)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy reviews, the facility failed to ensure that privacy was maintained for o...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy reviews, the facility failed to ensure that privacy was maintained for one resident (R1) of 14 residents reviewed. Specifically, R1's positive COVID status was announced in front of residents and a hospice staff member. Additionally, the Social Services Director (SSD) discussed R1 not following the facility's smoking protocol in the common area making R1 feel scared and uncomfortable. Findings include: Review of the undated facility's policy titled, Rights of Residents in Wisconsin Nursing Facilities included .The facility must treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality .The resident has a right to personal privacy and confidentiality of his or her personal and medical records .The facility must respect the resident's right to personal privacy, including the right to privacy in his or her oral (that is, spoken), written, and electronic communications . Review of the facility's policy titled, Protecting & Ensuring Resident Rights revised 07/2022 stated .3. All staff will be advocates for resident rights 4. All staff will receive training on resident rights prior to assignment as well as at least annually . Review of R1's admission Record located in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) under the Resident tab indicated that she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of cervical disc disorder at C4-C5 (cervical spine) level with myelopathy (spinal cord compression resulting in weakness, numbness, and tingling). Review of R1's Care Plan located in the EMR under the Care Plan tab revised 06/17/24 included smoking status and a revision on 10/22/24 indicating R1 had been COVID positive requiring quarantine for ten days (10/20/24-10/30/24). Review of R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 09/11/24 located in the EMR under the MDS tab included a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 indicating that she was cognitively intact. Review of R1's Order Summary located in the EMR under the Orders tab confirmed that she was diagnosed with COVID and required contact and droplet isolation from 10/22/24-10/31/24. Review of Certified Nursing Assistant's (CNA1) Relias training provided by the facility included Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) training on 06/30/24. Review of Social Services Director (SSD) Relias training provided by the facility included Communicating Effectively on 09/03/24, HIPAA on 05/31/24, Customer Service 08/15/24, and Resident Rights on 03/04/24. During an interview on 11/07/24 at 1:59 PM with CNA1 confirmed that she had gone outside to look for another resident and R1 asked her why she couldn't have a shower herself. CNA1 responded you can't be showered because you have COVID. CNA1 confirmed that there were at least two other residents outside. R1 seemed to be upset with her that another resident was going to be showered and not her. CNA1 confirmed that she should not have discussed her health status in front of other residents but didn't think about it until after she had already said it. During an interview on 11/07/24 at 5:15 PM with R1 she stated that when she had COVID in October 2024, she was outside smoking and CNA1 came outside looking for R15. R1 told CNA1 she hadn't had a shower in 13 days and asked why she couldn't go to the shower room, that's when CNA1 told her because R15 doesn't have COVID and you do. There was a lady in her car (CNA7) that heard this comment. R1 said it offended her that CNA1 voiced her personal health information in front of residents and the hospice CNA. R1 confirmed that she was not on hospice services and that CNA7 did not provide care for her. CNA7 told R1 that CNA1 should not have discussed her COVID status in front of other residents and herself. On another occasion, she had returned from a doctor's appointment and needed to use the restroom. Instead of stopping and turning in her smoking materials, she went straight to her room to use the restroom. The SSD and DON came up to her, began yelling at her for not turning in the smoking materials immediately. The SSD kept getting closer and closer to her wheelchair, he kept yelling at her and would not stop. R1 stated that she felt afraid of him, yelled back at him, and then went outside to get away from him. R1 stated that SSD was verbally attacking her, but did not feel this was abuse. The UC (Unit Clerk) approached her once she returned into the building and offered to give her a hug and told her she didn't deserve that, meaning the SSD did should not have spoken to her in that way. During an interview on 11/08/24 at 9:30 AM with CNA7 confirmed that in October 2024 she recalled sitting in her car outside the facility when she heard CNA1 tell R1 that she couldn't have a shower because she had COVID. There were other residents sitting outside and were able to hear her say this. During an interview on 11/08/24 at 2:30 PM with Unit Coordinator (UC) confirmed that the DON and SSD caught R1 at the front door telling her that she knew the smoking rules and SSD was badgering R1. R1 said leave me alone and he kept going and going. SSD was being stern about smoking and how she needed to give her cigarettes back. R1 did not seem scared, but did seem mad. R1 yelled at SSD to leave me the f*** alone! The incident occurred at the front entrance of the facility where other residents, visitors, and staff could hear the incident. UC stated she did not feel that R1 should have been reprimanded in front of visitors, residents, and other staff. During an interview on 11/08/24 at 3:25 PM with SSD stated that on the day in question, R1 had returned from a doctor appointment when one of the nurses reported to him that R1 had not turned in her smoking materials. The SSD approached her, and she began swearing at him, was belligerent and then went outside to smoke. The SSD denied raising his voice to R1 and did not touch her or the wheelchair. During an interview on 11/08/24 at 3:35 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that she recalled the day that R1 came in the building after returning from a doctor appointment and did not immediately turn in her smoking materials. She did not recall the SSD yelling at R1 but did confirm that R1 yelled at the DON and SSD. Herself and the SSD did have to raise their voice so that R1 could hear them while she was yelling. The DON did not confirm or deny the conversation was inappropriate. The DON's expectation was that all resident's medical information be kept confidential and she was not aware that CNA1 had announced R1's COVID status in front of other residents and a hospice staff member. The DON confirmed that CNA1 should not have voiced R1's medical status in front of other residents or visitors.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0676 (Tag F0676)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy reviews, the facility failed to ensure that activities of daily living (...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy reviews, the facility failed to ensure that activities of daily living (ADL) assistance was provided for 1 resident (R1) of 15 residents reviewed for ADLs. Specifically, R1 was not provided assistance with showering/bathing for 21 days while on COVID quarantine. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Activities of Daily Living (ADLS) revised 07/26/24 stated The facility will, based on the resident's comprehensive assessment and consistent with the resident's needs and choices, ensure a resident's abilities in ADLs do not deteriorate unless deterioration is unavoidable. Care and services will be provided for the following activities of daily living: 1. Bathing, dressing, grooming and oral care . Review of the facility's Shower Schedule provided by the facility indicated that R1 was to be showered on Monday's of each week. Review of Critical Event Analysis and Action Plan Worksheet provided by the Administrator and dated 11/06/24, indicated action was needed regarding bathing/showers. Education was to be provided to staff on appropriate documentation of bathing/showers. Additionally, audits were to be done twice weekly to ensure that residents received their scheduled showers. This was to continue for four weeks. The audit form provided was empty. Review of R1's admission Record located in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) under the Resident tab indicated that she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of cervical disc disorder at C4-C5 (cervical spine) level with myelopathy (spinal cord compression resulting in weakness, numbness, and tingling). Review of R1's Care Plan located in the EMR under the Care Plan tab revised 05/23/24 indicated that she had ADL self-care deficit as evidenced by weakness and required bathing/showering assist of one staff member as needed and as desired. Review of R1's 5-Day Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 09/11/24 located in the EMR under the MDS tab included a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 indicating that she was cognitively intact. Section G indicated that R1 was independent with oral hygiene and was dependent on showering/bathing. Set-up assistance was required with upper/lower body dressing and personal hygiene. Review of R1's Order Summary located in the EMR under the Orders tab confirmed that she was diagnosed with COVID and required contact and droplet isolation from 10/22/24-10/31/24. Review of R1's Documentation Survey Report v2 provided by the facility dated 10/2024 revealed R1 did not receive showering/bathing services from 10/09/24 to 10/29/24. No documentation was made to indicate the resident had refused showering/bathing services. During an interview on 11/07/24 at 1:59 PM with CNA1 stated that she was one of the shower aides and that residents received showers Monday through Friday based on the shower schedule. CNA1 confirmed that R1 was to receive showers on Mondays. CNA1 stated residents on COVID quarantine were to receive bed baths to reduce the risk of exposure to other residents. Sometimes the residents do not receive their showers on the designated days due to being short staffed. She will try to bathe them the following day but sometimes that is not possible. CNA1 did not recall R1 refusing any showers and could not recall if R1 was offered a shower/bath during her COVID quarantine. If a resident refused a shower that should be indicated in the CNA documentation also known as Documentation Survey Report v2. During an interview on 11/07/24 at 5:15 PM with R1 she stated that she had not received a shower/bath in over two weeks while she was on COVID quarantine in October 2024. Additionally, no one gave her any washcloths and no one helped her change her clothes for at least five days. R1 had reported this to multiple CNAs and no one assisted her. During an interview on 11/08/24 at 3:35 PM the Director of Nursing (DON) stated that the facility policy was for residents to receive a shower at least once weekly per the shower schedule, R1 was to have showers on Mondays. If a resident was on COVID quarantine, they could still receive a shower at the end of the shift so the shower stall could be disinfected. The DON stated that when there are call-in's she calls nurses/CNA's to cover the shifts, she had worked as a CNA multiple times over the past few months. Shower aides are sometimes pulled to the floor, when this happened they try to move the showers to other days. During COVID they were very low on staff and the last month and a half, they have been short staffed due to positive cases. The DON stated that R1 had been offered showers during COVID but the resident declined to be showered. Upon review of R1's shower documentation, the DON confirmed that R1's CNA documentation indicated that she had not been showered from 10/09/24 to 10/29/24. Her expectation was for residents to be showered at least once weekly and on non-shower days they should be given a bed bath daily. If a resident refused to be bathed/showered the CNA was expected to document refused as opposed to na (not applicable). During an interview on 11/09/24 at 6:25 PM with the Administrator, he stated that he was not aware of R1 not receiving showers and that the expectation was for residents to receive a shower at least once weekly and on non-shower days they should receive a bed bath. The facility had a past non-compliance plan in place regarding showers and CNA documentation. The expectation was for CNA's to document refused on the shower task documentation in the EMR rather than NA. The Administrator provided a copy of the document titled Critical Event Analysis and Action Plan Worksheet indicating that on 11/06/24 action was needed regarding bathing/showers. Education was to be provided to staff on appropriate documentation of bathing/showers. Additionally, audits were to be done twice weekly to ensure that residents received their scheduled showers. This was to continue for four weeks. The audit form provided was empty and the Administrator stated that they had not yet done any audits. Education was sent electronically to CNA's on 11/09/24 at 11:06 AM. The Administrator was informed this was part of his performance improvement plan due to implementation not starting until after the complaint investigations had began.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Quality of Care (Tag F0684)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews, interviews, and facility policy reviews, the facility failed to ensure that quality of care/treatment w...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews, interviews, and facility policy reviews, the facility failed to ensure that quality of care/treatment were provided to one resident (R6) of 12 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to provide a timely assessment for R6 after she sustained a fall. Findings include: Review of the policy titled Fall Prevention and Management Guidelines revised on 07/18/24 and provided by the facility stated, .When a resident experiences a fall, the facility will: A. Complete a post-fall assessment and review: 1) Physical assessment with vital signs 2) Neuro checks for any unwitnessed fall or witnessed fall where resident hits their head: Initially, then hourly x 3 then continue neuro checks every 4 hours x 6, then continue neuro checks every 8 hours x 6 or as indicated by the physician. Alert MD [Medical Doctor] of any abnormal findings from neuro checks - do not wait until series is complete to notify MD of abnormal findings .B. Complete an incident report in Risk Management. C. Notify physician and family/responsible party. D. Review the resident's care plan and update with any new interventions put in place to try to prevent additional falls. E. Document all assessments and actions. F. Obtain witness statements from other staff with possible knowledge or relevant information . The facility did not provide a policy related to following physician's orders. Review of R6's admission Record located in the EMR under the Profile tab revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of seizures. Review of R6's Care Plan provided by the facility indicated she was at risk for falls, had a history of poor safety awareness and did not always call for staff assistance for transfers/ambulation. R6 required one person assist with a gait belt for all transfers. Review of R6's Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 10/21/24 included a BIMS (Brief Interview Mental Status) score of nine out of 15 indicating she was moderately cognitively impaired and had two or more falls since admission and used a walker or wheelchair for ambulation. Review of R6's Fall Investigation, provided by the facility revealed she had an unwitnessed fall on 09/21/24 at 12:30 AM. No mention of the nurse assessing the resident was in the fall investigation. Unspecified CNAs (Certified Nursing Assistant) heard the resident yelling, upon entering her room, she was noted to be sitting on her buttocks next to her bed. R6 reported to staff that she had been transferring herself to her wheelchair. Review of R6's Telehealth Visit Note located in the EMR (Electronic Medical Record) under the Progress Notes tab by the physician dated 09/21/24 at 11:28 PM included reference to an unwitnessed fall over 24 hours ago that was never reported. R6 was noted with no injuries per physician report. Review of R6's Progress Note/SBAR (Situation/Background/Assessment/Recommendation) located under the Progress Notes tab and dated 09/22/24 at 12:06 AM stated On 09/21/24 at approximately 12:30 AM CNAs heard resident yelling at the nursing desk. Upon entering resident's room resident was sitting on butt next to bed. She said that she had been transferring herself to her w/c [wheelchair]. She denies hitting head . During an interview on 11/07/24 at 3:19PM with CNA2 confirmed that R6 fell out of bed a while back while Registered Nurse (RN3) was on duty. Herself and another CNA, she could not recall who it was, were instructed to get R6 up and into her wheelchair. CNA2 did not see RN3 assess the resident. When they found R6 on the floor the pressure pad alarm was not in the on position, the wheelchair was near the bed and was not locked, and the resident had a history of self-transferring with a lack of safety awareness. During an interview on 11/08/24 at 8:19 PM with RN3 confirmed that R6 had sustained a fall in September 2024 during the night shift, she had been busy with another resident when the aides reported the fall to her. The next thing she knew, she saw R6 in the bird room near the front entrance. RN3 confirmed that she failed to report the fall until the next day and the physician was upset with her. It was at that time [the next day] that she assessed the resident and started the fall investigation documentation. RN3 confirmed that all falls should be reported at the time of the fall or as soon as practicable. During an interview on 11/08/24 at 8:45 PM with CNA8 confirmed that R6 had sustained a fall in September 2024 on the night shift. CNA8 confirmed helping to get her up off the floor. He was unable to recall any further details regarding the falls. During an interview on 11/09/24 at 3:52 PM with the DON confirmed that RN3 was the nurse on duty on 09/21/24 night shift when R6 sustained a fall. Review of documentation confirmed that RN3 did not assess the resident until the next day. The DON's expectation was that all residents that sustain a fall be assessed at that time, the staff should not move the resident until assessed by the nurse, and the fall should be reported immediately to the family, physician, and administrative staff.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pressure Ulcer Prevention (Tag F0686)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews, interviews, and facility policy reviews the facility failed to ensure that qualify of care/treatment we...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record reviews, interviews, and facility policy reviews the facility failed to ensure that qualify of care/treatment were provided to 1 residents (R3) of 12 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to follow physician orders related to wound care for R3. Findings include: Review of the policy titled Pressure Injuries and Non pressure Injuries revised 07/20/22 and provided by the facility stated, .For those residents admitted with, or who subsequently developed a pressure injury or impaired skin integrity, they will receive care, treatment, and services that seek to promote healing, prevent infection, and prevent further development of pressure injuries/impaired skin integrity . The facility did not provide a policy related to following physician's orders. Review of R3's admission Record located in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) under the Profile tab revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of heart failure. Review of R3's Care Plan provided by the facility indicated she required extensive assistance with repositioning, transferring, hygiene, and bathing. The care plan also included a status of multiple pressure ulcers requiring wound care assessment, monitoring, and treatment. R3 was incontinent of bowel and bladder and resistive to turning and repositioning. Review of R3's Significant Change in Status Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 11/04/24 included a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 4 out of 15 indicating she was severely cognitively impaired and had multiple pressure ulcers. Review of R3's Order Summary, provided by the facility and dated 08/27/24, included cleansing the wound to the left hip with wound cleanser, apply skin prep to peri wound (allow to dry), apply calcium alginate (wound treatment to aide in healing) to wound bed, cover and secure with foam border twice daily unless soiled. Review of the Medication Admin Audit Report provided by the facility indicated that R3's wound care was performed by Registered Nurse (RN1) on 09/09/24 at 9:46 PM. Review of the Investigation Summary, dated 09/09/24 and provided by the facility, revealed that the facility was made aware on 09/12/24 that on 09/09/24 RN1 did not complete wound treatment according to the most recent treatment orders for R3. A witness statement by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA6) indicated that RN1 put medi honey on the wound and then wiped it off with gauze or paper towel. A witness statement by R3 indicated that RN1 .came in she went to use the medihoney [sic] & R3 told her we weren't using that anymore, it burns so she went and checked the computer and then wiped it off and put the new stuff on . Review of a witness statement by RN1, dated 09/09/24, stated she was called to R3's room, the dressing was saturated. She removed the dressing and used spray wound cleanser onto a piece of paper towel to clean up the peri-wound and pat the area dry. She took another piece of paper towel and sprayed it with wound cleanser and gently patted the wound noting a piece of dark slough, it stuck to the dry paper towel and the tissue came off. An abdominal pad and opsite (waterproof dressing) was applied to the wound. Additionally, RN1 reported that the facility was out of calcium alginate (a gelatinous, cream-colored substance that's used in wound dressings and in other application). Review of the facility document titled, Employee Disciplinary Form, dated 09/12/24, indicated that RN1 did not follow doctor orders. Specifically, the wrong medication was applied to the wound and she used paper towel to cleanse a wound. During an interview on 11/08/24 at 3:35 PM the Director of Nursing (DON) stated that during her investigation of R3's wound care indicated that CNA6 witnessed RN1 applying medi honey to R3's wound. CNA6 and RN1 had been in R3's room together for wound care. The DON confirmed that the facility investigation revealed RN1 did not follow physician orders by using medi honey and paper towels to clean the wound. RN1 was terminated in September 2024 after this incident and another incident where she did not assess residents being admitted to the facility. R3 refused to be interviewed 11/07/24-11/09/24. RN1 was not available for interview.
Jul 2024 6 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0554 (Tag F0554)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that self-administration of medications was dete...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that self-administration of medications was determined to be clinically appropriate for 1 of 1 resident (R2) reviewed for self-administration of medications out of a total sample of 9 residents. Surveyor observed R2 holding a med cup of pills in her room without staff present. The facility did not complete a self-administration of medication assessment on R2 and R2 did not have a physician order for administering her own medications. Evidenced by: The facility's policy, entitled Self-Administration by Resident, dated 2007, includes: Residents who desire to self-administer medications are permitted to do so with a prescriber's order and if the nursing center interdisciplinary team has determined that the practice would be safe, and the medications are appropriate and safe for self-administration . R2 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbances. R2's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 6/21/24 indicates R2 has moderate cognitive impairment with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 out of 15. On 7/30/24 at 9:40 AM, Surveyors observed R2 in her room holding a medication cup with pills in it. R2 asked Surveyor to locate her pill cutter and cut two of the pills in half to make swallowing them easier. Surveyor asked what the pills were for and R2 was unsure what the pills were, but knew she was supposed to take them as a nurse had dropped them off. Surveyor reassured R2 that the nurse on the unit would have a pill cutter and called for assistance. On 7/30/24 at 9:48 AM, RN C (Registered Nurse) entered R2's room. RN C indicated R2 did not have an order for self-administering medications. RN C indicated R2 had not been assessed and deemed safe to self-administer her medications. RN C stated, I left them in the room. I knew better. I don't know what I was thinking. On 7/30/24 at 1:44 PM, NHA A (Nursing Home Administrator) indicated RN C told him she left medications with R2 and shouldn't have. NHA A indicated it is his expectations that medications are not left with residents to self-administer unless they have had a completed assessment showing they are safe to perform this act and have an order from their Personal Care Provider to self-administer medications.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploita...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment are reported immediately, but no later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, to the appropriate agencies in accordance with State law through established procedures for 1 of 1 sampled residents (R7). R7 voiced an allegation of abuse to Surveyor and to the facility using the grievance process. The facility failed to report the allegation of abuse to the state agency immediately within 2 hours. Evidenced by: Facility policy, entitled Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, dated 7/15/2022, includes: . Verbal abuse- means the use of oral, written, or gestured communication or sounds . includes disparaging language and derogatory terms to residents or their families, or within their hearing distance regardless of their age, ability to comprehend, or disability . Identification of abuse, neglect, or exploitation: . Verbal abuse of a resident overheard or inappropriate verbal conduct overheard . Reporting/Response: . Reporting of all alleged violations to the Administrator, state agency, adult protective services and to all other required agencies within the specified timeframe- immediately, but no later than 2 hours after the allegation is made if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in bodily injury or not later than 24 hours if the events that caused the allegation do not involve abuse and do not cause bodily injury . R7 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, including unspecified injury of head and cognitive communication deficit. R7's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 8/1/24 indicates R7's cognition is intact with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 out of 15. R7's grievance form, dated 7/18/24, includes: describe grievance/complaint using factual terms: CNA F (Certified Nursing Assistant) and CNA G behaving like children, unprofessional, yelling, screaming, swearing, uncalled for behavior. Facility Follow-Up: 7/19/14 counseling provided to aides on professionalism in hallways and during shift change. Additional education to be added to monthly CNA meeting on professionalism . On 7/30/24 at 10:00 AM, during an interview, R7 indicated he had something bothering him and he wasn't sure if he should tell Surveyor about it. Surveyor assured him that she would listen to any concerns he had regarding his stay at the facility. R7 indicated his experience in the facility has been terrible and staff are rude to him. R7 stated, CNA G is a (explicit language used). She raises her voice, yells at me, swears, is abrasive, and she makes me feel like I am an idiot. I'm not an idiot. R7 indicated he has reported this, but nothing was done about it. R7 indicated CNA G continues to work with him and continues to treat him in this manner. On 7/30/24 at 1:44 PM, NHA A (Nursing Home Administrator) indicated a staff member yelling, screaming, swearing within earshot of a resident could be an allegation of abuse. NHA A indicated the incident happened in the hallway and the swearing, screaming, and yelling was not directed at R7 according to the two staff involved. NHA A indicated a person could think this interaction was directed at them if they overheard it or if they had a cognitive deficit or dementia and did not understand the interaction. NHA A indicated a staff member on the next shift reported R7's concern to him and he was unaware if there were any other witnesses to the incident. NHA A indicated he did not report the allegation of abuse to the state agency.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Investigate Abuse (Tag F0610)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploita...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment were thoroughly investigated for 1 of 1 residents reviewed (R7). R7 voiced an allegation of abuse to Surveyor and to facility using the grievance process. The facility failed to protect R7 and failed to conduct a thorough investigation of the incident. Evidenced by: Facility policy, entitled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, dated 7/15/22, includes: .Verbal abuse- means the use of oral, written, or gestured communication or sounds . includes disparaging language and derogatory terms to residents or their families, or within their hearing distance regardless of their age, ability to comprehend, or disability . Identification of abuse, neglect, or exploitation: . Verbal abuse of a resident overheard or inappropriate verbal conduct overheard . Investigation of alleged abuse, neglect, exploitation: An immediate investigation is warranted when allegation or suspicion of abuse, neglect, or exploitation, or reports of abuse, neglect, or exploitation occur. Written procedures for investigating include: . investigating different types of alleged violations. Identifying and interviewing all involved persons, including the alleged victim, alleged perpetrator, witnesses, and others who might have knowledge of the allegation . Protection of resident: The facility will make efforts to ensure all residents are protected from physical and psychosocial harm during and after the investigation. Responding immediately to protect the alleged victim and integrity of the investigation. Examining the alleged victim for any signs of injury . psychosocial assessment if needed . Increased supervision of the alleged victim and residents . Room or staffing changes if necessary . protection from retaliation . providing emotional support and counseling to the resident during and after the investigation . R7 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, including cognitive communication deficit and unspecified injury of the head. R7's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 8/1/24 indicates R7's cognition is intact with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 out of 15. R7's grievance form, dated 7/18/24, includes describe grievance/complaint using factual terms: CNA F (Certified Nursing Assistant) and CNA G behaving like children, unprofessional, yelling, screaming, swearing, uncalled for behavior. Facility Follow-Up: 7/19/14 counseling provided to aides on professionalism in hallways and during shift change. Additional education to be added to monthly CNA meeting on professionalism . On 7/30/24 at 10:00 AM, during an interview R7 indicated he had something bothering him and he wasn't sure if he should tell Surveyor about it. Surveyor assured R7 that she would listen to any concerns he had regarding his stay at the facility. R7 indicated his experience in the facility has been terrible and staff are rude to him. R7 stated, CNA G is a (explicit language used). She raises her voice, yells at me, swears, is abrasive, and she makes me feel like I am an idiot. I'm not an idiot. R7 indicated he has reported this, but nothing was done about it. R7 indicated CNA G continues to work with him and continues to treat him in this manner. Facility staffing schedule, dated July 21-August 3, 2024, indicates CNA F worked on the following dates: 7/22, 7/23, 7/24, 7/26, 7/27, 7/28 and indicates CNA G worked the following dates: 7/23, 7/24, 7/25, 7/27, 7/28. On 7/30/24 at 1:44 PM NHA A (Nursing Home Administrator) indicated a staff member yelling, screaming, or swearing within earshot of a resident could be an allegation of abuse. NHA A indicated the incident happened in the hallway and the swearing, screaming, and yelling was not directed at R7 according to the two staff involved. NHA A indicated a person could think this interaction was directed at them if they overheard it or if they had a cognitive deficit or dementia and did not understand the interaction. NHA A indicated a staff member on the next shift reported R7's concern to him and he was unaware if there were any other witnesses to the incident. NHA A indicated he did not remove staff from working with R7 and he did not conduct a thorough investigation regarding the allegation of abuse, including collecting statements by the two staff members involved, interviewing R7, and interviewing other staff or residents who may have information about this incident.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation and interview, the facility did not ensure resident environments remained free of potential accidents/hazar...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation and interview, the facility did not ensure resident environments remained free of potential accidents/hazards for 3 of 9 residents (R6, R4, and R9) reviewed for hot water temperatures. R6, R4, and R9 voiced concerns of their water being too hot. Surveyor recorded unsafe temperatures on her thermometer of R6's, R4's, and R9's bathroom water. Evidenced by: Facility policy, entitled Safe Water Temperatures, dated 6/16/2022, includes, in part: It is the policy of the facility to maintain appropriate water temperatures in resident care areas. Direct staff will monitor residents during prolonged exposure to warm or hot water for any signs or symptoms of burns and will respond appropriately. Staff will be educated on safe water temperatures upon employment and on a regular basis. Water temperatures will be set to a temperature of no more than the state's allowable maximum water temperature . According to the Center for Medicare and Medicaid State Operations Manual, Appendix PP, reviewed 2/3/23, the time required to obtain a third degree burn at water temperatures of 127 degrees F (Fahrenheit) is one minute . The time required to obtain third degree burns at 124 degrees is 3 minutes . The time required to obtain a third degree burn at 120 degrees F is 5 minutes. Example 1 R4 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R4's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 6/3/24 indicates R4's cognition is intact with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15. On 7/30/24 at 10:15 AM, Surveyor asked permission to take a temperature reading of R4's water. R4 warned Surveyor, Be careful, it is really hot today. Surveyor held thermometer in the stream of hot water. After 1 minute, the thermometer read 127.6 degrees F (Fahrenheit). Example 2 R6 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R6's most recent MDS with ARD of 7/10/24 indicates R6 has moderate cognitive impairment with a BIMS score of 11 out of 15. On 7/30/24 at 11:00 AM, R6 indicated her water is way too hot at times. Surveyor held thermometer in the hot water stream from 11:05 AM to 11:07 AM and the thermometer read 123.4 degrees F. Example 3 R9 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R9's most recent MDS with ARD of 4/29/24 indicates R9's cognition is intact with a BIMS score of 14 out of 15. On 7/30/24 at 11:07 AM, R9 indicated his water is too hot at times. Surveyor held thermometer in the hot water stream for two minutes and the thermometer read 122.7 degrees F. On 7/30/24 at 11:28 AM, Director of Maintenance D indicated the hot water system has been a struggle for him to figure out. Director of Maintenance D indicated he has been crawling around in the duct work looking for directional valves and trying to figure out why some of the building has too hot of water while other parts have no hot water. Director of Maintenance D indicated he has replaced parts throughout the water system, including recirculating pump, thermostat to the hot water heater, and the 100-gallon hot water storage tank. Director of Maintenance D indicated he has other parts on order to try including cartridge unit and sensor. On 7/30/24 at 1:44 PM, NHA A (Nursing Home Administrator) indicated the recirculating water system has been a struggle for a couple weeks and that there is one hallway that does not get hot water consistently and another that gets too hot of water. NHA A indicated he is not aware of any injuries that have occurred due to the water being too hot. NHA A indicated he will educate staff to monitor more closely on the hallway where the water is too hot. NHA A indicated the facility might have to call a Master Plumber to assist with the issue.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0584)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation and interview, the facility did not ensure each resident had a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike envir...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation and interview, the facility did not ensure each resident had a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 6 of 9 sampled residents (R2, R1, R5, R3, R8, and R7). R8 and R7 indicated they have not had a working sink in their bathroom for over a week and have to go down the hallway in order to complete their personal hygiene. R2, R1, R5, and R3 voiced concerns regarding not having any hot water for about 3 weeks. Grievance Form, dated 7/12/24, indicates the facility has had concerns of no hot water since 7/12/24. Evidenced by: Facility policy, entitled Safe and Homelike Environment, dated 6/16/22, includes in accordance with residents' rights the facility will provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and home-like environment allowing the residents to use his or her personal belongings to the extent possible . A home-like environment is one that de-emphasizes the institutional character of the setting . a determination of home-like should include the resident's opinion of the living environment . housekeeping and maintenance services will be provided as necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable environment . Grievance Form, dated 7/12/24, includes Resident Representative . was concerned that there is no hot water . offered to show resident and resident representative temperature logs as well as the hot water in person . Example 1 R7 admitted to the facility on [DATE] after sustaining a fracture of the neck of his right femur. R7's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 8/1/24 indicates R7's cognition is intact with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 out of 15. R7's Comprehensive Care Plan, initiated 7/15/24, indicates R7 requires the assistance of one staff member and a gait belt to complete the activity of daily living- transfer. R7's Care Plan also indicates R7 requires the assistance of one staff member to set him up to wash his own face, hands and to shave. On 7/30/24 at 10:00 AM, R7 indicated his bathroom has been inoperative for a week and he has to transfer into a wheelchair and go down the hallway to get to a sink he can use. R7 indicated the sink in his bathroom has been removed and there is a strong odor of mildew coming from there now. On 7/30/24 at 10:02 AM, Surveyor observed R7's bathroom to have a musty, mildew odor and no sink. Where the sink had been attached to the wall Surveyor observed holes with pipes coming through and dried drip lines of a dark green/black substance. On 7/30/24 at 11:28 AM, Director of Maintenance D indicated R7's sink is on his list. On 7/30/24 at 1:44 PM, NHA A (Nursing Home Administrator) indicated Director of Maintenance D is working on R7's sink. Example 2 R8 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 7/30/24 at 10:00 AM, R8 indicated he does not have a sink in his bathroom and staff have to take him down the hallway to a sink to use. R8 indicated he can smell mold or mildew coming from his bathroom and this bothers him. R8's Comprehensive Care Plan, initiated 7/25/24, indicates R8 requires the assistance of one staff member to meet his needs in transfer and personal hygiene. On 7/30/24 at 10:02 AM, Surveyor observed R8's bathroom to have a musty, mildew odor and no sink. Where the sink had been attached to the wall Surveyor observed holes with pipes coming through and dried drip lines of a dark green/black substance. On 7/30/24 at 11:28 AM, Director of Maintenance D indicated R8's sink is on his list. On 7/30/24 at 1:44 PM, NHA A (Nursing Home Administrator) indicated Director of Maintenance D is working on R8's sink. Example 3 R2 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbances. R2's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 6/21/24 indicates R2 has moderate cognitive impairment with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 out of 15. On 7/30/24 at 9:40 AM, R2 indicated she has not had hot water in her bathroom sink for about 3 weeks, stating, Go feel it for yourself. Surveyor recorded the following water temperatures: 9:41AM-9:45AM hot faucet- temperature 66.4 degrees F (Fahrenheit) 9:45AM-9:48AM cold faucet- temperature 66.4 degrees F Example 4 R1 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R1's most recent MDS with ARD of 8/1/24 indicates R1's cognition is intact with a BIMS score of 15 out of 15. On 7/30/24 at 1:37 PM, indicated she has no hot water in her room and hasn't since 7/4/24. Surveyor recorded the following temperatures: 1:29PM-1:32PM hot water faucet- temperature 65.8 degrees F 1:32PM- 1:37PM cold water faucet- temperature 65.8 degrees F Example 5 R3 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R3's most recent MDS with ARD of 6/25/24 indicates R3's cognition is intact with a BIMS score of 15 out of 15. On 7/30/24 at 1:28 PM, R3 indicated she does not have hot water in her room and hasn't had it for weeks. R3 stated Are we ever going to get hot water? I don't have any in my room. Example 6 R5 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R5's most recent MDS with ARD of 5/10/24 indicates R5's cognition is intact with a BIMS score of 15 out of 15. On 7/30/24 at 1:38 PM, R5 indicated she does not have hot water in her room and hasn't had it for weeks. Surveyor recorded the following temperatures: 1:29PM-1:32PM hot water faucet- temperature 65.8 degrees F 1:32PM- 1:37PM cold water faucet- temperature 65.8 degrees F On 7/30/24 at 10:22 AM, CNA E (Certified Nursing Assistant) indicated the staff have been having problems for weeks getting hot water on this hallway. CNA E indicated sometimes they go to other areas of the home to transport hot water in basins to the residents. Other times staff just use cold water. On 7/30/24 at 10:25 AM, RN C (Registered Nurse) indicated it has been a couple weeks since they were able to get hot water on this hallway. RN C indicated staff wash their hands with cold water and some of the residents refuse showers because the water is not hot. On 7/30/24 at 11:28 AM, Director of Maintenance D indicated the hot water system has been a struggle for him to figure out. Director of Maintenance D indicated he has been crawling around in the duct work looking for directional valves and trying to figure out why some of the building has too hot of water while other parts have no hot water. Director of Maintenance D indicated he has replaced parts throughout the water system, including recirculating pump, thermostat to the hot water heater, and the 100-gallon hot water storage tank. Director of Maintenance D indicated he has other parts on order to try including cartridge unit and sensor. On 7/30/24 at 1:44 PM, NHA A (Nursing Home Administrator) indicated the recirculating water system has been a struggle for a couple weeks and that there is one hallway that does not get hot water consistently. NHA A indicated the facility might have to call a Master Plumber to assist with the issue.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

ADL Care (Tag F0677)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility did not provide showers to 4 of 4 residents reviewed for Activities of Daily ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility did not provide showers to 4 of 4 residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) assistance (R1, R2, R5, R3). R1, R2, R3, and R5 indicated they have missed showers due to the facility not having hot water. Evidenced by: Facility policy, entitled Activities of Daily Living (ADLS), dated 7/26/22, includes: The facility will . ensure a resident's abilities in ADLs do not deteriorate unless deterioration is unavoidable. Care and services will be provided for the following ADLs: bathing, dressing, grooming, oral care, transfer, ambulation, toileting, eating, using speech . A resident who is unable to carry out ADLs will receive the necessary services to maintain good . grooming and personal and oral hygiene . Example 1 R1 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R1's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 8/1/24 indicates R1's cognition is intact with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15. On 7/30/24 at 1:37 PM, indicated she missed her shower due to the facility not having any hot water on her hallway and went 9 days without a shower. R1's Comprehensive Care Plan, initiated 4/28/23, indicates R1 requires the assistance of 1 staff member to meet her needs in the following areas: bathing/showering, dressing, locomotion. R1's Care Plan indicates she is non-ambulatory at this time. R1's shower documentation, 7/1/24-7/30/24, indicates R1 was not offered a shower on 7/10/24. (It is important to note there is a box to document if R1 refuses her shower and this box is not checked on this date.) Example 2 R2 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbances. R2's most recent MDS with ARD of 6/21/24 indicates R2 has moderate cognitive impairment with a BIMS score of 11 out of 15. On 7/30/24 at 9:40 AM, R2 indicated she has missed showers due to the facility not having hot water. R2's Comprehensive Care Plan, initiated 10/15/20, indicates she requires extensive assistance to meet her needs in bathing/showering. R2's Care Plan also indicates she is scheduled to take showers on Tuesday morning and Friday morning. R2's shower documentation, 7/1/24-7/30/24, indicates R2 was not offered a shower on 7/12/24 and 7/19/24. (It is important to note there is a box to document if R2 refuses her shower and this box is not checked on these dates.) Example 3 R3 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R3's most recent MDS with ARD of 6/25/24 indicates R3's cognition is intact with a BIMS score of 15 out of 15. On 7/30/24 at 1:28 PM, R3 indicated she has missed showers due to the facility not having hot water. R3's Comprehensive Care Plan, initiated 7/20/18, indicates R3 requires assistance to meet her needs in bathing/showering. It also indicates she is scheduled for a bath/shower on Monday mornings and Thursday mornings. R3's shower documentation, 7/1/24-7/30/24, indicates R3 was not offered a shower/bath on 7/4/24 and 7/11/24. (It is important to note there is a box to check if R3 refuses to take her shower/bath and this box was not checked for these dates.) Example 4 R5 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R5's most recent MDS with ARD of 5/10/24 indicates R5's cognition is intact with a BIMS score of 15 out of 15. On 7/30/24 at 1:38 PM, R5 indicated she has missed showers due to the facility not having hot water. R5's Comprehensive Care Plan, initiated 2/2/24, indicates R5 requires the assist of one staff member to meet her needs in showering/bathing. R5's shower documentation, 7/1/24-7/30/24, indicates R5 was not offered a shower on the following dates: 7/3/24 and 7/10/24. (It is important to note there is a box that can be checked if R5 refuses her shower, and this box was not checked on either of these dates.) On 7/30/24 at 10:22 AM, CNA E (Certified Nursing Assistant) indicated the staff have been having problems for weeks getting hot water on this hallway. CNA E indicated sometimes they go to other areas of the home to transport hot water in basins to the residents. Other times staff just use cold water. CNA E indicated showers have been missed due to the issue of not having hot water. On 7/30/24 at 10:25 AM, RN C (Registered Nurse) indicated it has been a couple weeks since they were able to get hot water on this hallway. RN C indicated staff wash their hands with cold water and some of the residents refuse showers because the water is not hot. On 7/30/24 at 11:28 AM, Director of Maintenance D indicated the hot water system has been a struggle for him to figure out. Director of Maintenance D indicated he has been crawling around in the duct work looking for directional valves and trying to figure out why some of the building has too hot of water while other parts have no hot water. Director of Maintenance D indicated he has replaced parts throughout the water system, including recirculating pump, thermostat to the hot water heater, and the 100-gallon hot water storage tank. Director of Maintenance D indicated he has other parts on order to try including cartridge unit and sensor. On 7/30/24 at 1:44 PM, NHA A indicated the recirculating water system has been a struggle for a couple weeks and that there is one hallway that does not get hot water consistently. NHA A indicated the residents should be able to have a hot shower.
Feb 2024 5 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Resident Rights (Tag F0550)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Example 2 Surveyor observed R24 sleeping in R32's bed. Staff failed to support and redirect R24 to R24's room and bed. Surveyor ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Example 2 Surveyor observed R24 sleeping in R32's bed. Staff failed to support and redirect R24 to R24's room and bed. Surveyor observed R32 coming in and out of R32's room, staring at R24 while R24 was sleeping in R32's bed. R24 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis including dementia without behavioral disturbance. R24's most recent MDS (Minimum Data Set) with ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 11/17/23, indicates R24 has a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 00 out of 15 indicating R24 is severely cognitively impaired. R32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis including dementia with agitation. R32's most recent MDS with ARD of 11/27/23, indicates R32 has a BIMS score of 00 out of 15 indicating R32 is severely cognitively impaired. On 2/1/24 at 10:34AM, Surveyor observed R24 stand up from living room area, walk to R32's room, and lay down in R32's bed. Surveyor brought this to the attention of two CNA's (Certified Nursing Assistant) and one LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) working down hallway. On 2/1/24 at 10:40AM, LPN J indicated they are letting R24 sleep in R32's bed. They will change the sheets once R24 gets up. On 2/1/24 at 11:00AM, CNA I indicated LPN J instructed them to let R24 continue sleeping in R32's bed. On 2/1/24 at 11:25AM, CNA H indicated they talked to the nurse working on their hallway regarding R24 sleeping in R32's bed. CNA H indicated LPN J told them to let R24 sleep in R32's bed and that they would change the sheets later. CNA H indicated there are times R24 is combative so it is just best to let R24 sleep in someone else's bed. It is important to note Surveyor did not observe CNA's or LPN attempt to redirect R24 to R24's bed and room. It is important to note Surveyor observed R32 come in and out of R32's room staring at R24 while R24 was in R32's bed and there was no staff supervision while this occurred. On 2/6/24 at 9:50AM, DON B (Director of Nursing) indicated it is not appropriate to leave R24 sleeping in R32's bed. DON B indicated it is confusing for both resident's as they have dementia and need redirection often regarding not going into other resident bedrooms. DON B indicated DON B would expect staff to redirect and encourage R24 to go to R24's bedroom and lay down in own bed. Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that every resident was treated with dignity and respect when providing activities of daily living (ADL) for 2 of 17 residents (R21 & R24) reviewed for resident rights of a total sample of 20. R21 indicated to Surveyor a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) put an incontinence product on her instead of assisting R21 to the bathroom. R21 does not use incontinence products. The facility did not ensure that R24 was treated with dignity and respect when providing activities of daily living (ADL). Evidenced by: The facility Rights of Residents in Wisconsin Nursing Facilities, in the Facility's New admission Packet, undated, states, in part: . Resident Rights: Residents have a right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with and access to persons and services inside and outside the facility. The facility must treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality. The facility must protect and promote the rights of the resident. The facility must provide equal access to quality care regardless of diagnosis, severity of condition, or payment source . Example 1 R21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and has diagnoses that include: Bipolar disorder (a disorder associated with episodes of mood swings ranging from depressive lows to manic highs), osteoarthritis (type of arthritis that occurs when flexible tissue at the ends of bones wear down), and chronic kidney disease stage 3 (your kidneys have mild to moderate damage, and they are less able to filter waste and fluid out of your blood). R21's Quarterly Minimum Data Assessment (MDS), dated [DATE], shows R21 has a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating R21 is cognitively intact. R21's Care Plan dated 2/5/29, with a target date of 3/30/23, states, in part: . Focus: ADL (Activities of Daily Living) self-care deficit as evidenced by related to physical limitations, Bipolar disorder, Osteoarthritis, chronic pain BLE (bilateral lower extremities) Date Initiated: 2/5/19 Revision on: 2/5/19. Goal: Will be clean, dressed, and well-groomed daily to promote dignity and psychosocial wellbeing Date Initiated: 2/5/19 Revision on: 1/3/24 Target Date: 3/30/24 Interventions: . *Requires CGA (contact guard assist) of extensive A1 (assist of 1) staff, walker, and gait belt to stand pivot transfer to CNA w/c (wheelchair) Date Initiated: 2/5/19 Revision on: 10/13/23 *Requires extensive assist of 1 staff for toileting, she uses call light to alert staff to toileting needs. Will stand/pivot transfer into w/c to bathroom or BSC (Bed Side Commode). Date Initiated: 2/5/19 Revision: 10/13/23. Focus: Potential for urinary incontinence r/t (related to): functional incontinence Date Initiated: 2/5/19 Revision on: 5/7/19 Goal: Will maintain continence, based upon usual voiding pattern Date Initiated: 8/1/19 Revision on: 1/3/24 Target Date: 3/30/24 Interventions: . *Provide assistance with toileting and encourage to get up to the bathroom, discourage use of bed pan. Date Initiated: 2/5/19 Revision on: 2/5/19 . *Remind and assist as needed with toileting at routine times such as upon rising in AM, before/after meals, activities, therapy and at bedtime and upon request Date Initiated: 2/5/19 Revision on: 2/5/19 . CNA [NAME] dated 2/6/24, states, in part: . Bladder/Bowel: . Remind and assist as needed with toileting at routine times such as upon rising in AM, before/after meals, activities, therapy and at bedtime and upon request. Toileting: . Provide assistance with toileting and encourage to get up to bathroom . On 2/1/24 at 9:35 AM, Surveyor interviewed R21. R21 indicated the day before she had her call light on around 5:30 AM - 6:00 AM for 15 minutes and no one came so she started to yell out, I got to go poop. R21 indicated a CNA came in and put a diaper on her instead of taking her to the bathroom. R21 indicated the CNA informed R21 it was not time to use the bathroom. R21 indicated this made her feel terrible because she does not wear diapers and is not incontinent. R21 asked the CNA why the CNA was putting a diaper on her, and the CNA indicated it is not time to use the bathroom. R21 indicated she had defecated in the diaper and a day CNA came in to change her when she put the call light back on. Surveyor asked R21 how this made her feel and R21 indicated it made her feel like she was nothing, she felt bad, and it took her dignity away. R21 indicated she felt helpless. On 2/1/24, at 1:15 PM, Surveyor interviewed CNA E and asked her if she could tell Surveyor about an incident that occurred with R21 this week. CNA E indicated at 6:05 AM Wednesday 1/31/24, R21 put her light on and had to use the bathroom. CNA E indicated R21 had an incontinence brief on that was soiled with BM (bowel movement) and R21's whole bed was soiled with BM when she answered R21's call light. R21 informed CNA E that CNA F had put the incontinence brief on her and told R21 it was not time to go to the bathroom. CNA E indicated R21 does not use incontinence products and R21 goes to the bathroom every hour per her normal routine. CNA E indicated she reported it to RN D (Registered Nurse) and a grievance was filled out. CNA E indicated R21 is continent of bowel and bladder and requires assist of 1 with transfers and toileting. CNA E indicated R21 was very upset. On 2/1/24 at 2:43 PM, Surveyor interviewed RN D and asked if RN D could tell Surveyor about an incident that occurred yesterday on 1/31/24 with R21. RN D indicated CNA E had reported to her that CNA F had taken R21 to the bathroom [ROOM NUMBER] minutes prior to R21 turning call light on to use the bathroom. CNA F had put an incontinence product on R21 and told the resident to go in the incontinence product and told R21 it was not her time to go to the bathroom. CNA E had found R21 incontinent of bowel. Surveyor asked RN D if this could be considered type of abuse and RN D indicated it is a dignity issue. RN D indicated R21 was very upset about it. Surveyor asked RN D if R21 is normally incontinent of bowel and bladder and uses incontinent products and RN D indicated no. RN D indicated R21 normally wears underwear. RN D indicated R21 does have a toileting behavior and is on a toileting schedule every hour. Surveyor asked RN D if it is R21's right to use the bathroom regardless of behavior and schedule and RN D indicated yes. On 2/5/24 at 8:44 AM, Surveyor interviewed NHA A (Nursing Home Administrator) and asked if he was aware of an incident involving R21 last week with a CNA putting an incontinence product on R21 and telling her to go in the incontinence product. NHA A indicated he received a call from R21's POA (Power of Attorney) and a grievance from a nurse and is aware of the incident. NHA A indicated CNA F thought she was able to use a brief and CNA F had just toileted R21 before putting on the brief. Surveyor asked NHA A if it is R21's right to use bathroom and NHA A indicated yes. NHA A indicated the facility preaches to the staff and they understand the staff cannot be in two places at once but let the residents know they will be there as soon as they can to help them. Surveyor asked NHA A if R21 wears a brief and NHA A indicated no. Surveyor asked NHA A if R21 is incontinent and NHA A indicated sometimes. Surveyor asked NHA A if he would consider this to be a dignity issue and NHA A indicated yes. NHA A indicated the ultimate goal is to take R21 to the bathroom if she wants to go. NHA A indicated he has provided education to CNA F over the telephone, and she had to complete two Relias trainings on the computer before returning to work and CNA F had completed. On 2/5/24, at 9:30 AM, Surveyor interviewed CNA F and asked CNA F to tell Surveyor about an incident with R21 that occurred last week. CNA F indicated she had just taken R21 to the bathroom [ROOM NUMBER] minutes prior and R21 began yelling out I'm going to poop the bed. CNA F indicated so she took an incontinence product and put it on R21 in case she poops the bed. CNA F indicated R21 has a behavior with toileting; if no one takes her every 5 minutes she screams out. CNA F indicated R21 goes to the bathroom every hour. Surveyor asked CNA F if it is a resident's right to be taken to the bathroom if he/she wants to go and CNA F indicated yes. Surveyor asked if R21 is on a toileting schedule and CNA F indicated yes but it is not on her care plan; everyone just started taking R21 every 5 minutes because of her behaviors. Surveyor asked CNA F if R21 uses incontinence products and CNA F indicated sometimes we put one on her on nights. Surveyor asked CNA F if R21 is incontinent and CNA F indicated sometimes R21 will pee the bed, it is a behavior. Surveyor asked if putting a brief on R21 instead of taking her to the bathroom that morning could be considered a dignity issue and CNA F indicated yes.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0688 (Tag F0688)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility did not ensure a resident with limited range of motion receives appropriate treatment and services to increase rang...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** The facility did not ensure a resident with limited range of motion receives appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion and/or to prevent further decrease in range of motion for 2 of 2 residents (R4 and R52) reviewed for Restorative Nursing Programming. R4 was discharged from therapy with a Restorative Nursing Program in place, Restorative Nursing Program was not being completed as directed by therapy. R52 was discharged from therapy with a Restorative Nursing Program in place, Restorative Nursing Program was not being completed as directed by therapy. This is evidenced by: Example 1 R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include dementia, weakness, anxiety disorder, chronic pain syndrome, history of stroke, and neuropathy. R4's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] states that R4 has a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) of 14 out of 15, indicating that R4 is cognitively intact. The MDS also indicates that R4 requires supervision/ touching assist with ambulation and that helper provides verbal cues or touching/steadying assistance as resident completes the task. On 2/23/23, R4 received therapy recommendations that state, Please ambulate pt (patient) 2x/day (2 times per day). R4's care plan dated 3/6/23 states in part: .Focus: Requires assistance/ Potential to restore function for mobility as evidenced by history of stroke, weakness, fatigue. Goal: Will walk with CGA (Care Giver Assist) of 1 staff, walker, and gait belt in hallway .Interventions/ Tasks: Nursing Restorative: Walking program ambulate with 1 CGA, gait belt and walker in hallway twice daily, distance tolerated with w/c (wheelchair) following . Surveyor reviewed two weeks of documentation of R4's Nursing Restorative Program. The documentation shows that R4 was ambulated 10 times out of 28 opportunities, R4 did refuse ambulation 1 time. The remaining missed opportunities were marked Not Applicable. Example 2 R52 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include Alzheimer's Disease, chronic kidney disease, and rheumatoid arthritis. R52's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] states that R52 has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 3 out of 15, indicating that R52 is severely cognitively impaired. The MDS also indicates that R52 requires supervision/touching assist with ambulation and that helper provides verbal cues or touching/steadying assistance as resident completes the task. On 9/8/23, R52 received therapy recommendations titled Restorative Nursing Program states Ambulation program: Device: FWW (Front Wheeled Walker), gait belt, w/c (wheelchair) for safety Distance: as tolerated x3 per day Assistance: CGA (Contact Guard Assist). R52's care plan dated 10/10/23 states in part : .Focus: Requires assistance to restore functions for mobility r/t (related to): fracture, loss of muscle, strength and flexibility .Goal: Will walk with CGA of 1 staff and gait belt on level surface .Interventions/ Tasks: Nursing Restorative: Walking Program #1-ambulate in hallway 3x/day as tolerated with CGA of 1 staff, FWW and gait belt, w/c to follow for safety . Surveyor reviewed the last two weeks of documentation of R52's Nursing Restorative Program. The documentation shows that R52 was ambulated 30 times out of 42 opportunities, R52 did refuse ambulation 2 times. The remaining missed opportunities were marked Not Applicable. On 2/5/24 at 2:49 PM, Surveyor interviewed CNA G (Certified Nursing Assistant). Surveyor asked CNA G how she knows which residents are on a restorative nursing program, CNA G stated that she would look at the care plan. Surveyor asked CNA G what it means when the documentation is marked not applicable, CNA G stated that means that she did not have time to get to it. On 2/5/24 at 3:09 PM, Surveyor interviewed DON B (Director of Nursing). Surveyor asked DON B if she would expect restorative orders/recommendations to be followed, DON B stated yes. Surveyor asked DON B if the program is ordered 3 times per day, what times is it scheduled for, DON B stated that she was not sure, whenever staff are available. Surveyor asked DON B if she would expect staff to document in the electronic health record, DON B stated yes. Surveyor asked DON B who is responsible for ensuring that the residents on a restorative program are being walked, DON B stated that she is not aware of any one person that is monitoring the program, but the IDT (Interdisciplinary Team) or MDS (Minimum Data Set) Coordinator is.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure 1 resident (R32) of 7 reviewed out of a total s...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure 1 resident (R32) of 7 reviewed out of a total sample of 20 residents receive adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents. R32 has PICA (put non-edible items in mouth.) The facility failed to ensure R32's Comprehensive Care Plan included details of the behavior, what items R32 will attempt to eat, what staff should do if they observe R32 put item in mouth, personalized interventions, and a system to track the incidents to ensure all staff provide adequate supervision and ensure the environment is as safe as possible. Evidenced by: The facility policy, titled, NSG (Nursing) Accidents and Supervision, Revised date, 7/14/22, states, in part; .Policy: The resident environment will remain as free of accident hazards as is possible. Each resident will receive adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents. This includes: 1. Identifying hazard(s) and risk(s). 2. Evaluating and analyzing hazard(s) and risk(s). 3. Implementing interventions to reduce hazard(s) and risk(s). 4. Monitoring for effectiveness and modifying interventions when necessary . R32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses including dementia with agitation, sleep apnea, other frontotemporal neurocognitive disorder, and anxiety disorder. R32's most recent MDS (Minimum Data Set) with ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 11/27/23, indicates R32 has a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 00 out of 15 indicating R32 is severely cognitively impaired. R32 has an activated power of attorney. R32's Comprehensive Care Plan, states, in part; .Potential for elopement/wandering r/t (related to) cognitive impairment, change in environment. Wandering into other resident's rooms which causes the residents distress .Barriers added to other resident rooms to aid in preventing unwanted entry date initiated 3/30/23 .Attempts to ingest foreign substances r/t: cognitive impairment Date initiated 8/19/21 revision on 8/19/21 .Will have no adverse effects and will remain safe date initiated 8/19/21 revision on 12/7/23 target date 2/25/24 .Keep non-edible items from immediate environment Date initiated 9/28/22 Revision on 3/1/23 . R32's CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) care card states, in part; .SAFETY Keep non-edible items from immediate environment . R32's Behavior Data tracking does not include PICA incidents. On 2/1/24 at 9:13AM, CNA H (Certified Nursing Assistant) indicated that R32 will wander into other resident's rooms. CNA H indicated if something looks like food to R32, R32 will put the item in his mouth. CNA H indicated CNA H is fairly new to facility, but she knows of one time when R32 tried to eat a Halloween decoration because it looked like food. CNA H indicated she does not know of any other incidents of R32 trying to eat non-food items. On 2/1/24 at 10:13AM, LPN J (Licensed Practical Nurse) indicated LPN J has worked at facility for many years and knows R32 very well. LPN J indicated that R32 will obsessively put items into his mouth. LPN J indicated that R32 puts anything in his mouth, will chew and attempt to eat item. LPN J indicated R32 has tried to eat bolts, dirt, jelly packets, shampoo, and literally anything. LPN J indicated she knows that R32 has eaten puzzle pieces. LPN J indicated if staff see R32 chewing on something two staff will attempt to get it out of his mouth by applying pressure to mouth to get it open and then remove object. LPN J indicated staff know that R32 has PICA and staff have to constantly monitor R32. LPN J indicated R32 will wander into other resident bedrooms and attempt to eat items as well. It is important to note Surveyor observed R32 in common area multiple times throughout survey without staff monitoring. On 2/1/24 at 10:30AM, CNA I indicated R32 does put non-edible items into mouth. CNA I indicated she only knows of the time R32 tried to eat a Halloween decoration and only knows that staff should try to keep items out of reach of R32. On 2/1/24 at 10:40AM, CNA K indicated CNA K has worked at the facility for 4 months now. CNA K indicated she knows about the time R32 tried to eat a Halloween decoration. CNA K indicated an intervention for this behavior is providing R32 something else like a snack. CNA K does not know of any other interventions and would report to nursing if witnessed the behavior. On 2/1/24 at 2:34PM, CNA E indicated she has worked at the facility for a little over 1 year. CNA E indicated R32 does attempt to eat non-edible items. CNA E indicated R32 will attempt to eat cups, napkins, and jelly/butter packets. CNA E indicated it is important that once a resident is done eating near R32 all those food items are picked up and not left near R32. CNA E indicated there is not a place in R32's behavior data tracking where staff can document if R32 has an attempted PICA incident. CNA E indicated it would be a good idea to document this behavior. On 2/1/24 at 2:39PM, CNA L indicated she has worked at the facility for a few months now. CNA L indicated she has not witnessed R32 to eat any non-edible items. CNA L indicated she heard of R32 attempting to eat a lid from a cup once. On 2/1/24 at 2:46PM, LEC M (Life Enrichment Coordinator) indicated she has worked at the facility for 2.5 years now. LEC M indicated R32 used to have many PICA incidents and would attempt to eat many different non-edible objects. LEC M indicated the behavior made it difficult for him to attend certain activities because the activity department had to make sure the environment was safe. LEC M indicated she would assume this is care planned in R32's Comprehensive Care Plan. LEC M indicated she ensures her activity staff are trained on this behavior. LEC M indicated she has seen a decrease with R32's PICA incidents and it might have something to do with his arthritis and needing more assistance with eating. LEC M indicated she has seen R32 attempt to eat gloves and butter packets. LEC M is unsure if R32 actually ate these items or if staff were able to assist him in time. LEC M indicated she trains activity staff to report incidents to the charged nurse. On 2/6/24 at 9:50AM, DON B (Director of Nursing) indicated R32 has PICA and will attempt to eat non-edible items. DON B indicated there has been some medication adjustments and at first it seemed like the behavior increased and now more recently the behavior has decreased. DON B indicated the facility has worked with pharmacist and primary doctor in regard to R32 labs because low iron could be a reasoning for increase in PICA incidents. DON B indicated there isn't a specific spot to document PICA in R32's behavior tracking. DON B indicated staff should report incident to the charged nurse and then the charged nurse should document incident. DON B indicated there was an incident with a tack and DON B provided education to the nurse because it should have been reported timely and documented, and it had not been. DON B indicated R32 will attempt to eat tacks off the bulletin boards, so facility removed the tacks. Surveyor asked DON B how new staff would learn about R32's PICA, what items R32 will try to eat, and how to create a safe environment? DON B indicated DON B understands what Surveyor is saying, the staff responsible for care plans is currently not at the facility. DON B indicated R32 will try to put anything in R32's mouth. DON B indicated if staff see R32 chewing on something they should remove R32 from common area and two staff should attempt to remove item from R32's mouth. Surveyor asked if this is detailed in R32's care plan to ensure the facility is keeping staff and R32 safe? DON B indicated this is not out lined in R32's care plan and indicated the facility would update R32's care plan. The facility failed to ensure R32's care plan included person-centered interventions regarding R32's PICA incidents. The facility failed to include what items R32 will attempt to eat, what staff should do if they observe the behavior, and the facility failed to ensure there was a system in place to track the incidents.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0692 (Tag F0692)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure a resident maintains acceptable parameters of nutritional stat...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure a resident maintains acceptable parameters of nutritional status and weight. This affected 1 (R8) of 1 resident's reviewed for nutrition and hydration out of a total sample of 20 residents. The facility failed to follow the Registered Dietician's recommendation regarding weekly weights to be completed for R8 after R8 experienced weight loss. Evidenced by: The facility policy, titled, Weight Monitoring, revised date 12/21/22, states, in part; .Policy The interdisciplinary team will strive to prevent, monitor, and intervene for undesirable weight change for our residents 7. The Dietician will review the monthly weights to follow individual weight trends over time. Weight trends will be evaluated by the interdisciplinary team whether or not the criteria for significant weight change has been met . R8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses including weakness, difficulty in walking, cognitive communication deficit, non-pressure chronic ulcer, kidney disease, heart failure, and age-related osteoporosis. R8's Comprehensive Care Plan, states, in part; .At risk for nutritional status change r/t (related to) recent admit and weight loss since admission date initiated 12/19/23 revision on 12/28/23 .Record weight per facility protocol/MD orders date initiated 12/19/23 . R8's weights state, in part; .12/19/23 136.8, 12/20/23 135.2, 12/21/23 136.6, 12/22/23 128.0, 12/23/23 126.2, 12/24/23 123.8, 12/25/23 126.0, 12/26/23 123.8, 12/28/23 124.0, 12/29/23 125.0, 1/2/24 126.1, 1/3/24 123.4, and 2/1/24 125.2. Registered Dietician note from 1/10/24 at 11:30am, states, in part; .resident triggers for a SWC of 9.8% .comparison weight 12/19 136.8 lbs . goal is weight maintenance. intakes have been poor initially and resident also had some edema upon admission. regular diet, po (by mouth) intakes avg 75-100% most meals, family brings in additional snacks, diet is supplemented with Sysco shakes only accepts chocolate, wounds are improving, recommended monitoring weight at minimum weekly .ENN (estimated nutritional needs) should be met w/ (with) current interventions. On 2/6/24 at 2:33PM, DON B (Director of Nursing) indicated IDT (Interdisciplinary Team) meets every Wednesday and resident weights are discussed at this time. DON B indicated that the Registered Dietician calls in to the meeting. DON B indicated the team met on 1/10/24 and DON B provided the notes from meeting. Surveyor asked if R8's weight was discussed at that time? DON B indicated R8 was discussed at the meeting. Surveyor showed DON B Registered Dietician's recommendations for weekly weight. DON B indicated R8 should be weighted weekly and that the order will be updated today.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0757 (Tag F0757)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure that each resident's drug regimen is free from unnecessary drug...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure that each resident's drug regimen is free from unnecessary drugs. This affected 1 of 2 resident's (R6) reviewed for antibiotic use. R6 was receiving an antibiotic to which she was resistant. This is evidenced by: R6 is a new admission to the facility. R6 has the following diagnoses: acute cystitis without hematuria, weakness, cognitive communication deficit, chronic kidney disease, and adult failure to thrive. R6's Discharge summary dated [DATE] contains the following antibiotic order: Trimethoprim 100 mg (milligrams) po (by mouth) at bedtime. R6's Clinical Laboratory Report dated 1/2/24 documents .Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole >= 320 R . This means that R6 is resistant to Trimethoprim and it will not be effective for her. R6's care plan documents the following: Actual infection UTI (Urinary Tract Infections)- Has recurring UTI's on prophylactic ABT (antibiotic). Will have no further complication r/t (related to) infection through review date. - Administer medications as ordered. - Encourage resident to use good clean hygiene techniques to avoid cross contamination. - Monitor for side effects from antibiotic therapy and report to physician if present. - Offer and encourage adequate intake of fluids. - Record temp/vitals as indicated. - Report to physician worsening signs/symptoms of infection or lack of improvement from treatment. R6's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for January documents that R6 received this antibiotic daily, 1/6/24-1/31/24. This is twenty-six doses in total. IP, ADON C (Infection Preventionist, Assistant Director of Nursing) faxed R6's Physician on 2/1/24 the following: .Pharmacist did medication review and recommends D/C (discontinue) of Trimethoprim prophylactically due to risk of hyponatremia (when the level of sodium in the blood is too low). If No D/C, please provide more information for use . Physician wrote back 2/1/24 D/C Trimethoprim. On 2/6/24 at 9:18 AM, Surveyor interviewed IP, ADON C. Surveyor asked IP, ADON C to explain the process to ensure that new admission residents are receiving the correct antibiotic. IP, ADON C explained that either herself, the DON (Director of Nursing), or MDS Nurse (Minimum Data Set) verbally asks questions of the hospital/clinic prior to admission to ensure there is a stop date in place and rationale for antibiotic use documented in paperwork and then depending on what day the resident admits to the facility, their PA (Physician Assistant) sees the new admissions either Tues or Fri. Surveyor asked IP, ADON C would it be herself/DON/MDS nurse that reviews all the residents' admission paperwork, IP, ADON C stated yes. Surveyor asked IP, ADON C if someone should have reviewed this lab work upon admission, IP, ADON C stated yes. On 2/6/24 at 4:58 PM, Surveyor interviewed DON B (Director of Nursing). Surveyor asked DON B if a resident should be on an antibiotic they are resistant to, DON B said no. It is important to note, R6 was receiving this antibiotic prophylactically to prevent UTI's.
Dec 2023 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0584)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident bathrooms were clean and homelike. Specifically, two bathrooms (Rooms E5 and B8) on 2 of 4 resident care areas had toilet sup...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident bathrooms were clean and homelike. Specifically, two bathrooms (Rooms E5 and B8) on 2 of 4 resident care areas had toilet supports with rusted metal and stained pieces of wood. In addition, the floors in three bathrooms were stained and dirty (Rooms E5, B8, and D1). Findings include: During an observation on 12/12/23 at 11:10 AM the bathroom in E5 was inspected for cleanliness. The bathroom had a toilet support with rusted support brackets. The support brackets were attached to a piece of unpainted wood that rested on the floor. The piece of wood was stained. The toilet had a buildup of dried feces and the floor under the toilet was stained with yellow and brown stains. During an observation with NHA A (Nursing Home Administrator) on 12/12/23 at 12:10 PM the bathroom in D1 was inspected for cleanliness. The bathroom toilet bowl was heavy with dark yellow stains covering the entire bowl. The floor under the toilet was stained with yellow and brown stains. There were two broken pieces of a plastic toilet brush holder on the floor beside the toilet. The bottom part of the plastic toilet brush holder had a buildup of black material. During the observation, NHA A stated, That looks dirty. During an observation on 12/12/23 at 12:25 PM the bathroom in B8 was inspected for cleanliness. The bathroom had a toilet support with rusted support brackets attached to a piece of unpainted wood that rested on the floor. The piece of wood was stained. The floor around the toilet was stained with yellow and brown stains. The support device was not sanitary. During an observation and interview with NHA A on 12/12/23 at 12:35 PM of the toilets and bathroom in E5 and B8 NHA-A said the former maintenance staff had placed the supports on the toilets and confirmed they looked dirty.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, record review, review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention(CDC) guidance, and poli...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, record review, review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention(CDC) guidance, and policy review, the facility failed to provide infection prevention procedures for 5 of 10 residents (R5, R6, R7, R4, and R3) during wound care, incontinence care, and when an infestation of maggots was found in R3's wound. In addition, the facility failed to ensure resident care equipment was clean and used exclusively for the resident intended. Specifically, bedpans and bath basins were unmarked, unbagged, and stored on the bathroom floors. Findings include: 1. During an observation on 12/12/23 between 9:30 AM and 10:00 AM, with DON B (Director of Nursing) revealed RN D (Registered Nurse) provided wound care to R5. RN D removed wound care items from the cart and placed them on top of the cart without wiping it with a disinfectant. RN D carried a plastic medicine cup of betadine, cotton swabs, and unpackaged gauze pads in her hands and entered R5's room. RN D placed the wound care items on R5's overbed table without disinfecting the top of the table. RN D did not use a barrier to place the wound care items on. The overbed table was visibly soiled. RN D washed her hands and donned gloves before removing the supportive stockings from R5's right and left leg. RN D used a gauze pad with betadine to clean the wounds on R5's toes of the right foot. RN D then used the same gauze pad to wipe the wounds on R5's toes of his left foot. RN D tossed the soiled gauze pads in the resident's trashcan. RN D did not have an appropriate receptacle to discard the soiled gauze pads. RN D doffed her gloves and did not wash her hands or use sanitizer before going back to the treatment cart outside the room. RN D removed more gauze pads and skin prep from the drawers of the treatment cart and placed the items on top of the treatment cart without disinfecting the top. RN D used gauze and skin prep to wipe R5's left heel. After using the gauze and skin prep on the resident's left heel, RN D doffed her gloves and did not wash her hands or use sanitizer. RN D returned the wound care items that had been placed on the soiled bedside table to the drawers of the treatment cart contaminating the items in the drawer. DON B confirmed the above observation of the breaks in infection control. Review of the policy titled Clean Dressing Change dated 07/20/22 indicated, Multi-use wound care supplies will be dated and initialed when opened . each wound will be treated individually . set up clean field on the overbed table with needed supplies for wound cleansing and dressing application . if the table is soiled, wipe clean . place a disposable cloth or linen saver on the overbed table . establish area for soiled products to be placed (Chux or plastic bag) remove gloves . discard into appropriate receptacle . wash hands and put on clean gloves. 2. During an observation on 12/12/23 at 10:05 AM with DON B revealed R6's bathroom was inspected for cleanliness. There were two unmarked and unbagged bedpans on the floor of the bathroom and one unmarked and unbagged bath basin on the floor. The bathroom floor was dirty. During the observation R6 stated, The staff assist me to the bathroom, and I use a bedpan at night. The DON confirmed the observation. 3. During an observation with DON B on 12/12/23 at 10:30 AM, revealed CNA F (Certified Nursing Assistant) provided incontinence care to R7. CNA F donned gloves and brought an unmarked basin of water to the bedside. CNA F removed R7's soiled disposable brief and dropped it on the floor next to the bed. CNA F did not have an appropriate receptacle to place the soiled brief in. CNA F used a washcloth to wipe R7's buttocks and anal area and dropped the washcloth on the floor. CNA F did not change gloves or wash her hands before using a second wash cloth to cleanse the perineum. CNA F cleansed the perineum and dropped the second washcloth on the floor. CNA F used a third washcloth to cleanse the perineum and dropped the washcloth on the floor. CNA F did not change her gloves during the procedure. DON B confirmed the observation. 4. An observation on 12/12/23 at 11:10 AM with DON B revealed CNA E provided incontinence care to R4. CNA E brought a bath basin of water out of the bathroom. CNA E stated, I couldn't find her (referring to R4) bath basin so I'm going to use this one. The bath basin CNA E used to provide incontinence care to R4 had another resident's name written on the side of the basin. DON B confirmed the observation. Review of a policy titled Perineal Care dated 04/04/23 indicated Perform hand hygiene and put on gloves .position resident in supine position .change gloves if soiled (and perform hand hygiene between dirty/clean gloves) . 5. R3 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including non-pressure chronic ulcer to left thigh, venous insufficiency, and morbid obesity. Review of R3's Daily Skilled Note dated 07/19/23 indicated, Found resident to have maggots in wounds today during cares. Areas washed thoroughly with H202 (hydrogen peroxide), bedding changed and will be washed per facility protocol. The note was signed by RN C. Review of R3's Daily Skilled Note dated 07/20/23 at 01:30 PM, indicated, Call placed to Dr .to have her get back to me regarding the issue with maggots found in wounds today during cares. Message left for her to call back at her convenience. Will have PA (Physicians Assistant) see resident tomorrow during rounds. The note was signed by RN C. Review of R3's SNF (Skilled Nursing Home) Follow Up Visit dated 07/21/23 with no time of day documented, provided by DON B indicated, Continue crusting technique for all wounds . slow improvement with her wounds. To new open areas in right leg fold .recommended elimination of flies in her room .Nursing staff report that maggots were found in right leg fold yesterday during routine cleaning, reports all maggots were cleaned away with hydrogen peroxide. (R3) reports pain at the site where maggots were found yesterday. CNA's report occasional fly or two in her room .multiple scattered open areas on bilateral legs, no discharge or slough. No maggots present on exam. The note was signed by the PA. During an interview on 12/12/23 at 09:00 AM IP G (Infection Preventionist) stated she started as the IP in August of 2023. IP G stated she had no knowledge of maggots in any residents wound. IP G was not aware that parasites should be included in the infection control program for prevention, identification, reporting, investigation, and control. During an interview on 12/12/23 at 3:30 PM NHA A (Nursing Home Administrator) stated We had an allegation of maggots. She (referring to R3) probably got them from the ambulance that took her to the hospital the day before. During the interview, NHA A stated the facility did not initiate an investigation to see if other residents with wounds were affected, did not investigate if flies were more prevalent in the facility or present in R3's room, did not discuss the maggots with the interdisciplinary team, and did not talk to R3 regarding the maggots. NHA A was unable to provide documentation regarding the maggots found in R3's wound. During an interview on 12/12/23 at 4:00 PM, DON B stated there were other residents with wounds during the time the maggots were observed in R3's wound. DON B stated no assessments were done to determine if other residents with wounds were affected. DON B stated, There was an RN from the agency who found them during wound care. We no longer use that agency. The RN from the agency reported the maggots to the charge nurse. DON B stated the charge nurse was RN C. DON B stated the facility did not investigate to see how the wound should be treated following the removal of the maggots. During an interview on 12/12/23 at 4:45 PM R3 stated, The nurse told me I had maggots in my wound on my leg and she was going to remove them. There were lots of flies here during the summer. I haven't had any more that I know of. I knew when the nurse was taking them off because she had to scrub hard. During an interview on 12/12/23 at 5:15 PM, RN C stated she was the charge nurse for the entire facility the day the agency nurse reported the maggots to her. RN C stated, I didn't go to the room and look at the maggots and I didn't talk to the resident about it. I didn't check any other residents' wounds in the facility to see if they had been affected. Review of the CDC, under Parasites indicated Prevention and control of transmission of infection .infectious organisms (e.g., bacteria, viruses, or parasites) .a parasite is an organism that lives on or in a host and gets its food from or at the expense of its host. Parasites can cause disease in humans .myiasis is an infectious disease caused by invasion of vital and/or necrotic tissues by larvae of houseflies.
Mar 2023 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility did not ensure that each resident was free from abuse, neglect, and exploitat...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility did not ensure that each resident was free from abuse, neglect, and exploitation for 1 (R1) of 8 residents reviewed. R2 had known behaviors of verbal aggression, wandering into other's rooms, attempting to care for residents and striking out at others. The facility failed to implement aggressive interventions to prevent resident to resident altercations. R2 struck R1 in the face causing R1 discomfort. Using the reasonable person concept a reasonable person would be afraid if struck by another individual. Evidenced by: Facility policy, entitled Abuse/Neglect/and Exploitation, dated [DATE], includes, in part: physical abuse includes but is not limited to hitting, slapping, punching, biting, and kicking. It also includes controlling behavior through corporal punishment. The facility will implement policies and procedures to prevent and prohibit all types of abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation that achieves: identifying correcting and intervening in situations in which abuse, neglect, exploitation, and or misappropriation of resident property is more likely to occur with the deployment of trained and qualified registered licensed and certified staff to meet the needs of the residents and ensure that the staff assigned have knowledge of the individual residents care needs and behavioral symptoms; the identification, ongoing assessment, care planning for appropriate interventions, and monitoring of residents with needs and behaviors which might lead to conflict or neglect; . the facility will make efforts to ensure all residents are protected from physical and psychosocial harm by . responding immediately to protect the alleged victim . increase supervision of alleged victim and residents; . the licensed nurse will respond to the needs of the resident and protect him or her from further incident. Training topics will include understanding behavioral symptoms of residents that may increase the risk of abuse and neglect such as aggressiveness, wandering or loment type behaviors, resistance to care, outbursts are yelling out, prohibiting, and preventing all forms of abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation . R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her Minimum Data Set (MDS) with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of [DATE], indicates R1's cognition is severely impaired with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 2 out of 15. R1 is R2's roommate and the victim of physical abuse by R2. R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including bipolar 2 disorder, depression, bipolar disorder with depression, altered mental status, Wernicke's encephalopathy, hallucinations, anxiety, alcohol induced pancreatitis, major neurocognitive disorder, and alcoholic cirrhosis of liver. R2 was also post status surgical removal of hardware or internal fixation device of left ankle and was ordered by her orthopedic surgeon to be non-weight bearing on left foot. R2's MDS with ARD of [DATE], indicates R2's cognition is mildly impaired with a BIMS score of 11 out of 15. (It is important to note R2 worked many years as a RN (Registered Nurse), and she has a MSN (Master's Degree in Nursing.) R2's Hospital Discharge, dated [DATE], includes, in part: . non-weight bearing in splint at all times . Will need to walk with a walker to keep weight off operative leg. The alignment can be lost if you put weight on operative leg. Wear splint at all times . R2's Comprehensive Care Plan, initiated [DATE], includes: [DATE] attempting to care for other residents . interventions: remind her she is not a nurse here. She is a patient . Remind her other staff are caring for the residents . R2's NN (Nurse Notes), included: [DATE] . resident displayed the following behaviors: bipolar with delusions . [DATE] . resident displayed the following behaviors: delusional . [DATE] . I was walking down . when I noticed R2 was fully packed up with all her items and a set of keys on her bed. She stated that the keys are to her truck that is parked in the parking lot . She said she was at the hospital and that her truck is outside, and she is going to get up and walk to her truck. I reminded her she is at . for surgery rehab and reminded her of her non-weight bearing status. She then appeared to be more focused . Then she was distracted again, stating that she saw a man poking his head in and out of his door and that she thinks she is in a facility because of her bipolar disorder . Sent medication list to psychiatrist, updated personal care provider . Psychiatrist returned call stating yes she is my patient and he reviewed the current list of medications she is currently on . the only medication that she is not on is Seroquel 100 mg by mouth at bedtime. This is the only medication she has not been getting . Order sent and faxed to pharmacy. Personal Care Provider updated . [DATE] . Nursing is monitoring behaviors on the starting of Seroquel at bedtime. R2 has been much better today than yesterday and seems calmer as she slept well during the night . [DATE] . needs reminders of non-weight bearing status . resident hallucinated throughout the day . [DATE] . R2 thinks today that she is a PHD (Physician) and then a nurse . and is talking about a patient she discharged 2 weeks ago that wants to come back here. She later called the local Sheriff's office and asked them to find her truck. Now called and asked for them come and drive her around to look for her truck, has all her belongings packed up in her wheelchair and ambulating on her lower left extremity which she is to be non-weight bearing. [DATE] . resident is all over the place and is unable to stay on track in a conversation. Resident was shaky and having difficult time transferring this morning . needed extensive assistance .Resident displayed the following behaviors: Resident is taking care of her patients. She had to be redirected many times. She is also looking for her truck . [DATE] . Resident displays the following behaviors: Resident has made several attempts at leaving facility and Wanderguard bracelet was put on right ankle . wandering, states that she has to go . people are waiting on her . [DATE] . Resident displayed the following behaviors: wandering, exit seeking, does seek exit and at times attempts to leave . needs reminders of non-weight bearing status . resident is wandering the facility looking for a way out . exit seeking . [DATE] . Resident displayed the following behaviors: exit seeking behaviors . resident calling friend to come and pick her up stating that she has her discharge paperwork, he came, and she was then given the phone to talk to her personal care provider and they agreed upon resident staying until at least Monday . Resident still has her things packed up and ready to leave. She is still hanging by the front door. She is easily redirected but she doesn't remember what happened moment to moment. She needs a lot of redirecting. [DATE] . resident is up in her wheelchair, still alert, but unable to stay on topic and forgetful . wandering . exit seeking . [DATE] . behavior changes noted. Calling police to pick her up, attempting to care for others as a nurse . confused . Interdisciplinary Team met care plan updated with target behaviors of exit seeking, packing, wanting to leave . Wanderguard on left ankle, chair alarm, attempts to leave and exit seeking, wandering . [DATE] . started hitting staff saying R1 is her patient . R1 removed from the hallway and provided cares by CNA . R2 gave thin liquid drink to another resident (R5) on her own while in dining room . [DATE] .disconnected R1's call light and bed alarm. R1 was not in room . Says this is her room . no one else's . [DATE] . R2 is noted for behaviors this period of attempting to help residents due to having previous RN role . Noted to be in doorway of another resident's room. CNA asked her if she could come out . wasn't her room . pays for these boulders and she will not move . CNA told R2 she needs to enter room to care for (other) resident and R2 started punching/hitting and kicking CNA . [DATE] . has outbursts at both residents and staff out of the blue . [DATE] . behaviors: wandering, impersonating employee at facility . having other residents push her in her wheelchair or assist her in ambulating . nursing is monitoring for safety of R2 and other residents . [DATE] .is on R1's bed without pants on . room scattered with belongings . 4:54 PM using rod from curtains to threaten staff . spilled water pitcher all over R1's bed . [DATE] . accepted to behavioral health unit . discharge planned for [DATE] . If you speak to her about not doing something . she will focus her entire attention on it and keep doing it. Tonight, it was climbing into a wheelchair that was not hers. Yesterday evening it was R1's bed. She needs to be constantly watched. (It is important to note, even though it is charted that R2 needs to constantly be in line of staff's sight, this intervention is not implemented .) [DATE] . R2 made many rude comments expressing swear words and anger at staff, visitors, and residents . R2 is trying to start something up with residents and staff . removed from area of conflict by staff . [DATE] . 7:20 AM CNA stated R2 hit her roommate (R1) in the head at 7:00 AM. When I arrived, R2 was standing in middle of room saying, This is my apartment. I am coming in to get R1 out. She kept pulling curtain back to see what we were doing . Go back to your own side . Got roommate (R1) out of room. R2 pulled call light out of wall . 8:40 AM Police called . Keep in line of sight when she comes out of room . Taken to new room with no roommate . R2's Comprehensive Care Plan, updated [DATE], includes: [DATE] Focus: Resident has behavior concerns as manifested by mental illness, paranoia, suspiciousness . Goal: Resident will be free of injury . will accept care and medications as prescribed . Interventions: Keep in line of sight while out of room . Observe for mental status/behavior changes as needed . Psych referral as necessary . Redirect as able . (It is important to note this is the first update to R2's care plan regarding keeping her in the line of sight.) Facility Self-Reported Incident Report, dated [DATE], includes: . (R2) hit (R1) . Residents were protected, and cops were called. (R2) was then placed in a private room with a private bathroom. The initial affect this had on (R1) was that she said, Owe. Once the incident was over (R1) did not seem to have any recollection of this. She did not seem mentally affected or emotionally affected. There are no bruising or other physical marks. Upon learning of this incident, the facility started a self-report and protected both the affected residents and all other residents. The cops were called, and room changes were completed to create the safest possible situation for all residents. Facility was also able to secure placement for (R2) at (behavioral health unit) . R2 hit R1 in the face . Upon learning of the situation, the facility protected the resident and helped remove her from the situation. The police were contacted and R2 was moved to a private room with a private bathroom. Facility also completed resident interviews to see if there were any other concerns. Results of investigation: R2 was witnessed hitting R1, results of this investigation were that this did occur, and that the facility was able to protect the resident after the incident and were able to remove R2 and place her into a private room with a private bathroom. Conclusion: The actions in this report are confirmed by both CNA and the accused resident. In the days following this incident the facility was able to successfully protect all residents until R2 discharged to (behavioral health unit) on [DATE]. Interview by CNA witness: I was working down the . hallway. I saw R2 hit R1 in the face. (R1) screamed, owe! (R2) immediately told me that she hit (R1). I radioed the charge nurse while protecting (R1). Once the charge nurse arrived, we were able to remove (R1) from the room to ensure her safety. The charge nurse then called the police. Interview by Charge Nurse: I was called to residents' room by CNA stating (R2) hit her roommate in the head. Upon entering the room (R2) was in the middle of the room telling me this is her apartment with CNA that called me standing between the residents. I entered the room and was able to redirect (R2) so that CNA and I could get (R1) out of the room safely. After ensuring the residents safety we contacted the police department. We also moved (R2) into a private room with a private bathroom. 20 residents interviewed with no concerns voiced . On [DATE] at 1:10 PM CNA/Unit Coordinator D stated, she thought she was at school for nursing. She was a nurse and she tried to be a nurse here. She tried to help transfer others, tried to perform CPR (Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation) on (R1). CNA D (Certified Nursing Assistant) indicated R2 had outbursts due to hallucinations and she transferred herself all the time and was not on 1:1 monitoring before she struck R1, but she should have been due to her behaviors. On [DATE] at 1:20 PM CNA E indicated despite being non-weight bearing, R2 often stood up alone and changed her own clothes or just spent time being naked. CNA E indicated R2 spread her belongings all over the room even on R1's side of the room and R2 would wear R1's clothing at times. CNA E indicated R2 would often try to assist other residents and she would tell them that she is a nurse, and she works here, and she can help. CNA E also indicated R2 would enter other resident rooms and try to assist them and would push residents down the hallway in their wheelchairs. CNA E indicated R2 was not on 1:1 supervision or in line-of-sight supervision until after she hit R1, but she should have been because other residents were expressing anger and annoyance due to R2's behaviors. On [DATE] at 1:30 PM LPN F (Licensed Practical Nurse) indicated R2 told her she was a nurse and LPN F often seen R2 trying to assist other residents, including R1, transfer, eat, drink, put shoes on, and by pushing them in their wheelchairs. On [DATE] at 1:48 PM RN G (Registered Nurse) indicated R2 was impulsive, yelled, threw things, crawled on the floor, disrobed, was hard to understand, and she would start on one subject and just flip page to a different subject. RN G indicated R2's history included a master's degree in Nursing, and she often attempted to care for others, would come in when staff were assisting other residents with ADLs (activities of daily living/personal cares), and she would tell staff how to do the job. RN G indicated R2 would see something that needed to be done and she would start helping. RN G indicated staff had to remove R1 from her room because R2 had taken over the whole room with her things and was even laying on R1's bed. RN G indicated the staff did not keep R2 in line of sight or on 1:1 supervision because they don't have the staff numbers to do this. RN G indicated R2's behaviors were increasing, and staff should have given R2 her own room to protect R1. On [DATE] at 2:01 PM during an interview RN H indicated R2 had a nursing degree and she thought she was employed by the facility. RN H indicated she tried to keep R2 in her line of sight as much as possible, but she was never put on 1:1 supervision or on in line-of-sight supervision. RN H was unsure how the staff could ensure R1 was protected from R2 without 1 on 1 supervision. RN H stated, The night R2 wouldn't get out of R1's bed, we just switched their beds. R2 slept in R1's bed and R1 slept in R2's bed. Surveyor asked if R1 was ok with this arrangement. RN H was not sure. Surveyor asked if R1 was safe in the room with R2. RN H indicated she thought so, but she wouldn't know for sure unless R1 voiced a concern because the two were left in the room unsupervised. On [DATE] at 2:17 PM ADON C (Assistant Director of Nursing) indicated she did R2's initial assessment and at first there were no indications that R2 shouldn't have a roommate. ADON C indicated resident safety is very important and she would have handled this situation differently than the previous DON (Director of Nursing) did. ADON C indicated R2 should have been put on 1:1 supervision when R2 stated she worked here and these were her residents and she would assist other residents with transferring, by pushing them in their wheelchairs, putting on their shoes, and other tasks. ADON C indicated R2 would swear and yell at staff, other residents, and visitors. ADON C indicated staff never followed up with other residents when R2 would have outbursts to see if they feared R2. ADON C indicated staff should have documented which residents R2 swore at, yelled at, and they should have followed the facility abuse policy and procedure. ADON C indicated after two witnessed incidents of R2 assisting other residents R2 should have been put on more strict supervision such as in line of sight. ADON C indicated she was not aware of any other times that R2 touched R1 besides when she hit her in the face. ADON C indicated the two residents were often in the room by themselves without supervision and no one would have known if there were other interactions between the two while in the room unsupervised. ADON C indicated R2 was alone with other residents in their rooms too at times unsupervised and this should not have been the case. ADON C indicated the only way they could have ensured the safety of the other residents was to put R2 on 1:1 supervision and they didn't do that and then R1 was hit by R2. ADON C stated she would have moved R2 to a different room or moved R1 to a different room when R2 started saying R1 was her patient. On [DATE] at 3:00 PM SW I (Social Worker) indicated R2 could hurt other residents trying to assist them. SW I indicated R2 became possessive of R1 and would not allow staff in the room to care for R1. SW I indicated R2 should have been kept in line of sight to ensure the safety of residents in the home and R2 should not have shared a room with another resident after the facility became aware that R2 was attempting to assist other residents and was combative with staff. On [DATE] at 4:17 PM NHA A (Nursing Home Administrator) indicated the facility staff should have implemented extra monitoring of R2 on [DATE] when she gave R5 thin liquids and was found trying to assist other residents to ensure resident safety. NHA A indicated on [DATE] the facility staff should have put R2 on extra monitoring and/or given a new room when she was found to be in another resident's room and would not allow staff to come in, to assist other resident. On [DATE], NHA A indicated there was another opportunity for staff to put R2 on extra monitoring when it is noted in nurse notes that R2 was having outbursts at other residents. NHA A indicated all residents in the nursing home are vulnerable and R2 should have been placed on 1:1 supervision or placed on in line-of-sight supervision to protect other vulnerable residents. NHA A indicated staff who intervened should have reported R2 trying to administer CPR to R1 and didn't. NHA A indicated staff should have monitored residents who were yelled at, sworn at, or had confrontations with R2 to be sure they felt safe. NHA A stated R2 was placed on in line-of-sight supervision on [DATE] after she struck R1. NHA A stated, We could have done more. We should have done more.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and assistive devices to ensure safety ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and assistive devices to ensure safety and prevent accidents for 6 residents (R1, R2, R5, R6, R7, and R8) reviewed for wandering and resident to resident altercations out of a total sample of 8. The facility failed to provide adequate supervision for R2, who assisted R5 in drinking thin liquids while R5 had an order to consume nectar thickened liquids. The facility failed to provide adequate supervision and R2 displayed possessive behaviors with R1, R2 attempted to perform CPR on R1, who had a pulse and was breathing, and R2 eventually slapped R1 in the face. The facility failed to provide adequate supervision when R2 attempted to assist R6, R7, and R8 with ADLs (activities of daily living) and R6, R7, and R8 were confrontational with R2. Evidenced by: Example 1 R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including bipolar 2 disorder, depression, bipolar disorder with depression, altered mental status, Wernicke's encephalopathy, hallucinations, anxiety, alcohol induced pancreatitis, major neurocognitive disorder, and alcoholic cirrhosis of liver. R2 was also status post-surgical removal of hardware or internal fixation device of left ankle and was ordered by her orthopedic surgeon to be non-weight bearing on left foot. R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of [DATE], indicates R2's cognition is mildly impaired with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 out of 15. (It is important to note R2 worked many years as a RN (Registered Nurse), and she has a MSN (Master's Degree in Nursing.) R2's Comprehensive Care Plan, updated [DATE], includes: [DATE] Focus: Resident has behavior concerns as manifested by mental illness, paranoia, suspiciousness . Goal: Resident will be free of injury . will accept care and medications as prescribed . Interventions: Keep in line of sight while out of room . Observe for mental status/behavior changes as needed . Psych referral as necessary . Redirect as able . (It is important to note this is the first update to R2's care plan regarding keeping her in the line of sight.) [DATE] . R2 is noted for behaviors this period of attempting to help residents due to having previous RN role . Noted to be in doorway of another resident's room. CAN (Certified Nursing Assistant) asked her if she could come out . wasn't her room . pays for these boulders and she will not move . CNA told R2 she needs to enter room to care for (other) resident and R2 started punching/hitting and kicking CNA . [DATE] . yelling . using objects to try to hit staff . belongings all over the floor . is on R1's bed without pants on .climbing into a wheelchair that was not hers. Yesterday evening it was R1's bed. She needs to be constantly watched. (It is important to note, even though it is charted that R2 needs to be constantly watched) R2 made many rude comments expressing swear words and anger at staff, visitors, and residents . took a pen from CNA desk and jabbed it in CNA's left forearm . R2 is trying to start something up with residents and staff . removed from area of conflict by staff . [DATE] . 7:20 AM CNA stated R2 hit her roommate (R1) in the head at 7:00 AM. When I arrived, R2 was standing in middle of room saying, This is my apartment. I am coming in to get R1 out. She kept pulling curtain back to see what we were doing . Go back to your own side . Got roommate (R1) out of room. R2 pulled call light out of wall . 8:40 AM Police called . Keep in line of sight when she comes out of room . Taken to new room with no roommate . On [DATE] at 1:48 PM RN G (Registered Nurse) indicated R2 was impulsive, yelled, threw things, crawled on the floor, disrobed, was hard to understand, and she would start on one subject and just flip page to a different subject. RN G indicated R2's history included a master's degree in Nursing, and she often attempted to care for others, would come in when staff were assisting other residents with ADLs (activities of daily living/personal cares), and she would tell staff how to do the job. RN G indicated R2 would see something that needed to be done and she would start helping. On [DATE] at 2:17 PM ADON C (Assistant Director of Nursing) indicated she did R2's initial assessment and at first there were no indications that R2 shouldn't have a roommate. ADON C indicated resident safety is very important and she would have handled this situation differently than the previous DON (Director of Nursing) did. ADON C indicated R2 should have been put on 1:1 supervision on [DATE] when she gave R5 thin liquids, because he was at risk for aspiration pneumonia due to his diagnoses. ADON C indicated R2 would state she worked here, and these were her residents, and she would assist other residents with transferring, by pushing them in their wheelchairs. ADON C indicated R2 would swear and yell at staff, other residents, and visitors. ADON C indicated staff never followed up with other residents when R2 would have outbursts to see if they feared R2. ADON C indicated staff should have documented which residents R2 swore at, yelled at, and they should have followed the facility abuse policy and procedure. Example 2 R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her MDS with ARD of [DATE], indicates R1's cognition is severely impaired with a BIMS score of 2 out of 15. R1 is R2's roommate. Facility Self-Reported Incident Report, dated [DATE], includes: . (R2) hit (R1) . Residents were protected, and cops were called. (R2) was then placed in a private room with a private bathroom. The initial affect this had on (R1) was that she said, Owe. Once the incident was over (R1) did not seem to have any recollection of this. She did not seem mentally affected or emotionally affected. There are no bruising or other physical marks. Upon learning of this incident, the facility started a self-report and protected both the affected residents and all other residents. The cops were called, and room changes were completed to create the safest possible situation for all residents. Facility was also able to secure placement for (R2) at (behavioral health unit) . R2 hit R1 in the face . Upon learning of the situation, the facility protected the resident and helped remove her from the situation. The police were contacted and R2 was moved to a private room with a private bathroom. Facility also completed resident interviews to see if there were any other concerns. Results of investigation: R2 was witnessed hitting R1, results of this investigation were that this did occur, and that the facility was able to protect the resident after the incident and were able to remove R2 and place her into a private room with a private bathroom. Conclusion: The actions in this report are confirmed by both CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) and the accused resident. In the days following this incident the facility was able to successfully protect all residents from other issues until R2 discharged to (behavioral health unit) on [DATE]. Interview by CNA witness: I was working down the . hallway. I saw R2 hit R1 in the face. (R1) screamed, owe! (R2) immediately told me that she hit (R1). I radioed the charge nurse while protecting (R1). Once the charge nurse arrived, we were able to remove (R1) from the room to ensure her safety. The charge nurse then called the police. Interview by Charge Nurse: I was called to residents' room by CNA stating (R2) hit her roommate in the head. Upon entering the room (R2) was in the middle of the room telling me this is her apartment with CNA that called me standing between the residents. I entered the room and was able to redirect (R2) so that CNA and I could get (R1) out of the room safely. After ensuring the residents safety we contacted the police department. We also moved (R2) into a private room with a private bathroom. 20 residents interviewed with no concerns voiced . On [DATE] at 1:10 PM CNA/Unit Coordinator D stated, she thought she was at school for nursing. She was a nurse and she tried to be a nurse here. She tried to help transfer others, tried to perform CPR on (R1). CNA D (Certified Nursing Assistant) indicated R2 had outbursts due to hallucinations and she transferred herself all the time and was not on one-on-one monitoring before she struck R1, but she should have been. On [DATE] at 1:20 PM CNA E indicated, R2 spread her belongings all over the room even on R1's side of the room and R2 would wear R1's clothing at times. CNA E indicated R2 would often try to assist other residents and she would tell them that she is a nurse, and she works here, and she can help. CNA E also indicated R2 would enter other resident rooms and try to assist them and would push residents down the hallway in their wheelchairs. CNA E indicated R2 was not on one-on-one supervision or in line-of-sight supervision until after she struck R1, but she should have been because other residents were expressing anger and annoyance due to R2's behaviors. On [DATE] at 1:48 PM RN G (Registered Nurse) indicated staff had to remove R1 from her room because R2 had taken over the whole room with her things and was even laying on R1's bed. RN G indicated the staff did not keep R2 in line of sight or on one-on-one supervision because they don't have the staff numbers to do this. RN G indicated yelling or swearing could be verbal abuse and many times R2 swore or yelled at other residents. RN G indicated R2 could hurt other residents by assisting them or hurt herself. On [DATE] at 2:01 PM during an interview RN H (Registered Nurse) indicated there was a night R2 wouldn't get out of R1's bed, we just switched their beds. R2 slept in R1's bed and R1 slept in R2's bed. Surveyor asked if R1 was ok with this arrangement. RN H was not sure. On [DATE] at 2:17 PM ADON C (Assistant Director of Nursing) indicated she was not aware of any other times that R2 touched R1 besides when she hit her in the face. ADON C indicated the two residents were often in the room by themselves without supervision and no one would have known if there were other interactions between the two while in the room unsupervised. ADON C indicated R2 was alone with other residents in their rooms too at times unsupervised and this should not have been the case. ADON C indicated the only way they could have ensured the safety of the other residents was to put R2 on 1:1 supervision and they didn't do that and then R1 was hit by R2. ADON C stated she would have moved R2 to a different room when R2 started saying she was R2's patient. On [DATE] at 3:00 PM SW I (Social Worker) indicated R2 could hurt other residents trying to assist them. SW I indicated R2 became possessive of R1 and would not allow staff in the room to care for R1. SW I indicated R2 should have been kept in line of sight to ensure the safety of residents in the home and R2 should not have shared a room with another resident after the facility became aware that R2 was attempting to assist other residents. Example 3 R5 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including pneumonia, oropharyngeal phase dysphagia, dementia without behaviors, and adult failure to thrive. R2's Nurses Notes [DATE] . R2 gave thin liquid drink to another resident (R5) on her own while in dining room .R5's Physician Orders, 11/2022, includes: diet: mechanical soft, nectar thickened liquids . (It is important to note R5 has a history of Pneumonia, has dysphagia, and has a diet order for thickened liquids and R2 gave him thin liquids to drink.) On [DATE] at 1:30 PM LPN F (Licensed Practical Nurse) indicated R2 told her she was a nurse and LPN F often seen R2 trying to assist other residents transfer, eat, drink, put shoes on, and by pushing them in their wheelchairs. LPN F indicated R2 gave R5 thin liquids to drink despite him having orders for thickened liquids. LPN F indicated R5 did not have any signs of aspiration after the episode.
Dec 2022 5 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and policy review, the facility did not ensure allegations of abuse were immediately reported to State Survey...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and policy review, the facility did not ensure allegations of abuse were immediately reported to State Survey Agency. A facility reported incident was received by State Survey Agency on 11/15/22 after resident (R)50 reported allegations of abuse on 11/11/22. This is evidenced by: R50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses include history of stroke affecting right side, muscle weakness, adjustment disorder with anxiety and depressed mood, and osteoarthritis of left shoulder. Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], verified R50 has adequate hearing, impaired vision, ability to be understood and understands others. Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. PHQ-9 score of 18, indicating moderately severe depression. Delusions present, verbal and other behaviors and rejection of care occurred 1-3 days. One-person physical assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). Care Plan: -Paranoia/suspiciousness as evidenced by false accusations, fear of people stealing things related to chronic anxiety. Intervention: Have 2 people in room at all times when involved with resident. -Potential for pain evidenced by complaints of pain or noted anxiety related to: Recent Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA) with right non-dominant hemiplegia, osteoarthritis to (L) shoulder. Facility Reported Incident: On 11/11/22 at 4:00 PM, R50 reported being forced to have an x-ray and being pulled from her wheelchair, resulting in her shoulder being popped out. Facility immediately ensured R50 was safe and began an internal investigation. The facility's internal investigation was unsubstantiated through physician follow up, interviews with R50, x-ray technician and staff. Facility submitted incident report and investigation on 11/15/22. 12/15/22, Surveyor interviewed business Office Manager (BOM) I and attempted to interview R50; however, R50 declined. Surveyor reviewed facility reported incident and investigation and had no concerns regarding facility's investigation of the incident. 12/20/22 at 11:20 AM, Surveyor interviewed Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) A. NHA reported that facility policy is to immediately report any allegations of abuse. NHA A stated that 7 or 8 facility reported incidents had been reported that week for R50. NHA A stated that he did ensure that R50 was safe and did begin an immediate investigation. However, he recognized R50's pattern of false accusations, and after initially investigating had determined that the incident did not occur. On 11/14/22, NHA A organized meeting with regional staff to discuss incident with R50. During that meeting it was determined that the incident was a reportable incident and should have been reported immediately. NHA A stated that after reviewing incident he identifies that he should have reported it immediately. On 11/15/22, NHA A submitted incident report and facility investigation to State Survey Agency.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility did not implement the plan of care for 1 of 17 sampled residen...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility did not implement the plan of care for 1 of 17 sampled residents (R265). The facility did not follow the care plan to include gripper socks on when in bed and wheelchair next to side of bed and locked, to remind resident to use wheelchair and not ambulate independently. This is evidenced by: On 11/28/22, R265 sustained a fall at the facility resulting in right femur fracture. R265 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R265's diagnoses include peripheral vascular disease, lymphedema, and atrial fibrillation. Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] verified R265's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was a score of 04, indicating severe cognitive impairment and required extensive assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). Fall Assessment completed on 12/6/22 confirmed that R265 is at moderate risk for falls. R265's Fall Care Plan included interventions: Place wheelchair next to bed in locked position to remind him to use wheelchair and not walk independently, dated 9/22/22. To wear gripper socks when in bed as is impulsive and will get up at times unassisted, dated 9/9/22. 12/14/22 at 8:31 AM, Surveyor observed R265 barefoot in bed. R265's wheelchair was not placed next to bed. Surveyor observed R265 again, after breakfast meal and observed that R265 was barefoot in bed and wheelchair was not placed next to bed. During interview, R265 reported he was aware of having surgery on his right leg but was unable to remember why, stating, I think I got hit by something but can't remember. 12/15/22 10:00 AM, Surveyor interviewed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) H. Surveyor asked CNA H where they would find care plan needs for a resident. CNA H indicated they refer to the [NAME]. When asked about interventions in relation to R265's fall preventions, [NAME] H stated, I don't know everything off hand but knew he needed 2 persons assist or could utilize the sit to stand lift with 1 person. His bed should be in lowest position, and he has gripper sock on when in bed. Reviewed [NAME] and confirmed the following: Place wheelchair next to bed in locked position to remind him to use wheelchair and not walk independently. To wear gripper socks when in bed as is impulsive. 12/16/22 at 9:02 AM, Surveyor interviewed Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) A. NHA A reported that department heads meet each morning to discuss concerns and changes. Any changes are put into a communication log that is kept at the nurse's station. Nursing is responsible to update staff with changes, including changes to care plans and [NAME] and ensure they are followed.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Incontinence Care (Tag F0690)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility did not provide catheter care in a manner that helps prevent in...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility did not provide catheter care in a manner that helps prevent infection for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for catheter care. Resident (R)54 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and required assistance from staff for activities of daily living (ADLs) which included care of indwelling urinary catheter. R54 had a diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease, Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms, other Obstructive and Reflux Uropathy (urine can not drain and backs up into the kidney). R54 did have a history of Urosepsis (when a urinary tract infection spreads and causes sepsis). On 12/14/22 at approximately 11:38AM, Surveyor observed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) C and CNA D get R54 up for lunch. After picking up the mats on the floor and bringing the bed up, Surveyor observed CNA C empty the catheter drainage bag. CNA C then took a washcloth from the sink and began to wash R54's groin area, turned R54 on their side and to apply A & D ointment. CNA C did not remove gloves and wash hands between these tasks. CNA D had removed gloves but not washed hands. CNA D then went to the dresser drawer, removed R54's socks without washing hands after removing gloves. On 12/14/22 at approximately 11:45AM, Surveyor interviewed CNA C regarding catheter care. Surveyor asked CNA C where they were being trained on infection control procedures. CNA C stated on a computer training program called Relias. Surveyor asked CNA C what they did wrong when providing catheter care. CNA C stated they usually use ETOH wipes to wipe off the tubing before and after emptying but they did not this time. Both CNA C and CNA D stated they were aware they did not wash hands after removing gloves, or change gloves between dirty and clean tasks. On 12/14/22 at approximately 2:45PM, Surveyor interviewed Director of Nursing (DON) B regarding expectations for catheter care when done by a CNA. Surveyor asked how catheter care should be done by CNAs. DON B stated they should clean the body from the inside of the body to the outside. The CNA should wipe down the catheter tubing and empty the catheter and make sure to clean the tip before and after emptying with ETOH. They also should wash hands before putting on gloves and after removing them. On 12/14/22, Surveyor reviewed the facility policy entitled: Catheter Care, Indwelling Catheter. Under the title Procedure was the following instructions; 3. Perform hand hygeine using an alcohol based sanitizer or soap and water immediately before donning gloves to handle catheter and provide care. 17. Use a dedicated urine collection device with a resident identifier and date. Avoid splashing and prevent contact of the drainage spigot with the nonsterile collecting container when emptying the drainage bag. 18. Remove gloves and perform hand hygiene after care is complete. The AHRQ (Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality) website ahrq.gov, states the following regarding directives for emptying urinary drainage bags. In the article entitled Urinary Catheter Types and Care for Residents with Catheters under Slide 7: Wash hands before and after any contact with urinary catheter, tubing or bag. The facility did not ensure that CNA staff were using proper infection control when caring for urinary catheter drainage bags so as not to introduce bacteria into the system.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility did not use proper infection control procedures of glove change...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility did not use proper infection control procedures of glove changes and hand washing when providing catheter care for 1 of 3 residents reviewed. The facility did not ensure that CNA staff were using proper infection control when caring for urinary catheter drainage bags. This is evidenced by: Resident (R) 54 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and required assistance from staff for activities of daily living (ADLs) which included care of indwelling urinary catheter. R54 had a diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease, Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms, other Obstructive and Reflux Uropathy (urine can not drain and backs up into the kidney). R54 did have a history of Urosepsis (when a urinary tract infection spreads and causes sepsis). On 12/14/22 at approximately 11:38AM, Surveyor observed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) C and CNA D get R54 up for lunch. After picking up the mats on the floor and bringing the bed up, Surveyor observed CNA C empty the catheter drainage bag. CNA C then took a washcloth from the sink and began to wash R54's groin area, turned R54 on their side and to apply A & D ointment. CNA C did not remove gloves and wash hands between these tasks. CNA D had removed gloves but not washed hands. CNA D then went to the dresser drawer, removed R54's socks without washing hands after removing gloves. On 12/14/22 at approximately 11:45AM, Surveyor interviewed CNA C regarding catheter care. Surveyor asked CNA C where they were being trained on infection control procedures. CNA C stated on a computer training program called Relias. Surveyor asked CNA C what they did wrong when providing catheter care. CNA C stated they usually use ETOH wipes to wipe off the tubing before and after emptying but they did not this time. Both CNA C and CNA D stated they were aware they did not wash hands after removing gloves, or change gloves between dirty and clean tasks. On 12/14/22 at approximately 2:45PM, Surveyor interviewed Director of Nursing (DON) B regarding expectations for catheter care when done by a CNA. Surveyor asked how should catheter care be done by CNAs. DON stated they should clean the body from the inside of the body to the outside. The CNA should wipe down the catheter tubing and empty the catheter and make sure to clean the tip before and after emptying with ETOH. They also should wash hands before putting on gloves and after removing them. On 12/14/22, Surveyor reviewed the facility policy entitled: Catheter Care, Indwelling Catheter. Under the title Procedure was the following instructions; 3. Perform hand hygeine using an alcohol based sanitizer or soap and water immediately before donning gloves to handle catheter and provide care. 17. Use a dedicated urine collection device with a resident identifier and date. Avoid splashing and prevent contact of the drainage spigot with the nonsterile collecting container when emptying the drainage bag. 18. Remove gloves and perform hand hygiene after care is complete. The AHRQ (Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality) website ahrq.gov, states the following regarding directives for emptying urinary drainage bags. In the article entitled Urinary Catheter Types and Care for Residents with Catheters under Slide 7: Wash hands before and after any contact with urinary catheter, tubing or bag.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview and policy review, the facility failed to distribute food under sanitary conditions and store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Th...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview and policy review, the facility failed to distribute food under sanitary conditions and store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This has the potential to affect 67 of the 67 residents that reside at the facility. The facility failed to distribute food under sanitary conditions; the kitchen had several soiled areas observed. The facility's process for cooling foods being used for leftovers was not done in a manner that protected the residents from foodborne illness. The facility did not complete cooling logs for leftover foods. This is evidenced by: Unsanitary conditions Observations in the kitchen on 12/14/22 at 1:23 PM include thick brown dried grime on oven handles, doors, and the base just below the oven door, white residue on the floor and mop board tiles on the right side of the stove, visual dust on wall above open storage shelf that houses colanders, mixing bowls, pots, pans, and lids, visual dust present on pipes and wet chemical fire suspension system, dry brown grime on mixer where attachments are placed, and the floor was tacky. Interview on 12/14/22 at 1:37 PM with Dietary Manager (DM) E Surveyor reviewed the above observations. DM E stated that he cleaned the top of the dishwasher a month ago and is surprised that so much accumulated since then. Is aware of the dust and stove and states that he has been working in the facility a little over a month and knows he has a lot to work on and is planning to get things in order. He said his first focus was getting staff on board while working, learning, and training. He understands the importance and there have been no food borne illnesses in the facility. EXAMPLE 2 On 12/15/22 at approximately 10:30 AM, Surveyor did initial tour of the kitchen with DM E. Surveyor observed sliced ham cooling in the refrigerator. Ham was covered in a large square container. Surveyor interviewed DM E regarding the cooling process for leftovers. DM E stated they do serve leftovers and was unsure of the cooling process or if there were cooling logs. DM E stated that [NAME] F may know. Surveyor interviewed [NAME] F. [NAME] F indicated the ham was from breakfast this morning. [NAME] F also stated the facility does use leftovers and they do not keep cooling logs. Leftovers are labeled, dated and placed in the refrigerator to cool. On 12/15/22, Surveyor reviewed policy titled, Food Preparation. Policy states, in part . Prepared hot food items that are not intended for immediate service will be cooled using the following guidelines: Place in shallow pan or cut/slice to promote rapid cooling. Foods will be cooled from 135 degrees F to 70 degrees F within 2 hours. Foods will be cooled from 70 degrees F to 41 degrees within 4 hours. Total cooling time cannot exceed 6 hours. The clock starts at 135 degrees F. Surveyor reviewed Public Health Service Food and Drug Administration Food Code, which states cooked potentially hazardous foods that are subject to time and temperature control for safety are best cooled rapidly within 2 hours, from 135 to 70 degrees F, and within 4 more hours to the temperature of approximately 41 degrees F. The total time for cooling from 135 to 41 degrees F should not exceed 6 hours. Improper cooling is a major factor in causing foodborne illness. Taking too long to chill foods has been consistently identified as one factor contributing to foodborne illness.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • 44% turnover. Below Wisconsin's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: 1 life-threatening violation(s), 2 harm violation(s). Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 39 deficiencies on record, including 1 critical (life-threatening) violation. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
  • • Grade F (16/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: Trust Score of 16/100 indicates significant concerns. Thoroughly evaluate alternatives.

About This Facility

What is Elroy Health Services's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns ELROY HEALTH SERVICES an overall rating of 1 out of 5 stars, which is considered much below average nationally. Within Wisconsin, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. A rating at this level reflects concerns identified through health inspections, staffing assessments, or quality measures that families should carefully consider.

How is Elroy Health Services Staffed?

CMS rates ELROY HEALTH SERVICES's staffing level at 3 out of 5 stars, which is average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 44%, compared to the Wisconsin average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.

What Have Inspectors Found at Elroy Health Services?

State health inspectors documented 39 deficiencies at ELROY HEALTH SERVICES during 2022 to 2025. These included: 1 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death), 2 that caused actual resident harm, and 36 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.

Who Owns and Operates Elroy Health Services?

ELROY HEALTH SERVICES is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by NORTH SHORE HEALTHCARE, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 80 certified beds and approximately 59 residents (about 74% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in ELROY, Wisconsin.

How Does Elroy Health Services Compare to Other Wisconsin Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Wisconsin, ELROY HEALTH SERVICES's overall rating (1 stars) is below the state average of 3.0, staff turnover (44%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (1 stars) is much below the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Elroy Health Services?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations.

Is Elroy Health Services Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, ELROY HEALTH SERVICES has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 1 Immediate Jeopardy citation (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 1-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Wisconsin. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.

Do Nurses at Elroy Health Services Stick Around?

ELROY HEALTH SERVICES has a staff turnover rate of 44%, which is about average for Wisconsin nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.

Was Elroy Health Services Ever Fined?

ELROY HEALTH SERVICES has been fined $9,750 across 1 penalty action. This is below the Wisconsin average of $33,176. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.

Is Elroy Health Services on Any Federal Watch List?

ELROY HEALTH SERVICES is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.