MERCY MANOR TRANSITION CENTER
Inspected within the last 6 months. Data reflects current conditions.
Mercy Manor Transition Center in Janesville, Wisconsin has received a Trust Grade of D, indicating below-average care with some concerns. They rank #156 out of 321 facilities in the state, placing them in the top half, and #3 out of 10 in Rock County, meaning only two local options are better. The facility is improving, with reported issues decreasing from three in 2024 to two in 2025. Staffing is a strong point, rated 4 out of 5 stars, but with a turnover rate of 55%, which is average for Wisconsin. However, the facility has incurred $82,840 in fines, which is concerning and indicates repeated compliance problems. There have been critical incidents, including a failure to assess a resident with worsening symptoms, which ultimately led to their death. In addition, there were multiple concerns about food safety, such as spoiled food in the refrigerator and staff not consistently practicing proper hand hygiene during meal preparation. While the facility has good RN coverage, these serious issues highlight the need for improvement in overall care and compliance.
- Trust Score
- D
- In Wisconsin
- #156/321
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 55% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
- Penalties ⚠ Watch
- $82,840 in fines. Higher than 86% of Wisconsin facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
- Skilled Nurses ✓ Good
- Each resident gets 146 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than 97% of Wisconsin nursing homes. RNs are the most trained staff who catch health problems before they become serious.
- Violations ○ Average
- 9 deficiencies on record. Average for a facility this size. Mostly minor or procedural issues.
The Good
-
4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
-
4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
Near Wisconsin average (3.0)
Meets federal standards, typical of most facilities
Near Wisconsin avg (46%)
Higher turnover may affect care consistency
Well above median ($33,413)
Moderate penalties - review what triggered them
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 9 deficiencies on record
Jan 2025
2 deficiencies
1 IJ
CRITICAL
(J)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that each resident received, and the facility provided, care a...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Report Alleged Abuse
(Tag F0609)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploita...
Read full inspector narrative →
May 2024
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure that 1 of 8 residents (R8) reviewed for Activiti...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not maintain a safe and sanitary environment in which food i...
Read full inspector narrative →
Mar 2024
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0700
(Tag F0700)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess the risk of entrapment, advise of the risk and...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jun 2023
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Resident Rights
(Tag F0550)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation and interview, the facility did not ensure that each resident was treated with dignity and respect for 1 of 8 sampled residents (R62).
R62 expressed concerns regarding CNA H (Cer...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Abuse Prevention Policies
(Tag F0607)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility did not implement their written policy which includes completing background checks for 2 of 8 employees.
PTA M (Physical Therapy Assistant) and RN N...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This has the po...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review the facility did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program des...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: 1 life-threatening violation(s), $82,840 in fines. Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 9 deficiencies on record, including 1 critical (life-threatening) violation. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
- • $82,840 in fines. Extremely high, among the most fined facilities in Wisconsin. Major compliance failures.
- • Grade D (48/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
About This Facility
What is Mercy Manor Transition Center's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns MERCY MANOR TRANSITION CENTER an overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars, which is considered average nationally. Within Wisconsin, this rating places the facility higher than 0% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This mid-range rating indicates the facility meets federal standards but may have areas for improvement.
How is Mercy Manor Transition Center Staffed?
CMS rates MERCY MANOR TRANSITION CENTER's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 55%, compared to the Wisconsin average of 46%. RN turnover specifically is 67%, which is notably high. RNs provide skilled clinical oversight, so turnover in this role can affect medical care quality.
What Have Inspectors Found at Mercy Manor Transition Center?
State health inspectors documented 9 deficiencies at MERCY MANOR TRANSITION CENTER during 2023 to 2025. These included: 1 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death) and 8 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.
Who Owns and Operates Mercy Manor Transition Center?
MERCY MANOR TRANSITION CENTER is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility is operated by MERCYHEALTH SYSTEM, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 28 certified beds and approximately 13 residents (about 46% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in JANESVILLE, Wisconsin.
How Does Mercy Manor Transition Center Compare to Other Wisconsin Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Wisconsin, MERCY MANOR TRANSITION CENTER's overall rating (3 stars) matches the state average, staff turnover (55%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (3 stars) is at the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Mercy Manor Transition Center?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations.
Is Mercy Manor Transition Center Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, MERCY MANOR TRANSITION CENTER has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 1 Immediate Jeopardy citation (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 3-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Wisconsin. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.
Do Nurses at Mercy Manor Transition Center Stick Around?
MERCY MANOR TRANSITION CENTER has a staff turnover rate of 55%, which is 9 percentage points above the Wisconsin average of 46%. Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Mercy Manor Transition Center Ever Fined?
MERCY MANOR TRANSITION CENTER has been fined $82,840 across 1 penalty action. This is above the Wisconsin average of $33,907. Fines in this range indicate compliance issues significant enough for CMS to impose meaningful financial consequences. Common causes include delayed correction of deficiencies, repeat violations, or care failures affecting resident safety. Families should ask facility leadership what changes have been made since these penalties.
Is Mercy Manor Transition Center on Any Federal Watch List?
MERCY MANOR TRANSITION CENTER is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.