Amie Holt Care Center

497 W Lott, Buffalo, WY 82834 (307) 684-5521
Government - Hospital district 50 Beds Independent Data: November 2025
Trust Grade
90/100
#1 of 33 in WY
Last Inspection: April 2025

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Amie Holt Care Center in Buffalo, Wyoming has received an impressive Trust Grade of A, indicating it is highly recommended and excels in care quality. Ranking #1 out of 33 facilities in Wyoming, it is in the top tier of nursing homes, and it is the only facility in Johnson County. The center is trending positively, having reduced issues from 5 in 2024 to just 2 in 2025. Staffing is a standout feature, with a 5-star rating and a turnover rate of 40%, which is lower than the state average, suggesting that staff members are experienced and familiar with residents' needs. On the downside, the facility has faced some concerns, including a lack of proper temperature monitoring for food storage, which could risk food safety, and issues with hand hygiene during meal service, potentially increasing the risk of infections. Additionally, there were instances where residents' private health information was not adequately secured, raising concerns about confidentiality. Despite these weaknesses, the overall quality of care remains strong, supported by no fines and good RN coverage.

Trust Score
A
90/100
In Wyoming
#1/33
Top 3%
Safety Record
Low Risk
No red flags
Inspections
Getting Better
5 → 2 violations
Staff Stability
○ Average
40% turnover. Near Wyoming's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
Penalties
✓ Good
No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Wyoming facilities.
Skilled Nurses
✓ Good
Each resident gets 58 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than average for Wyoming. RNs are trained to catch health problems early.
Violations
○ Average
7 deficiencies on record. Average for a facility this size. Mostly minor or procedural issues.
★★★★★
5.0
Overall Rating
★★★★★
5.0
Staff Levels
★★★★☆
4.0
Care Quality
★★★★☆
4.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2024: 5 issues
2025: 2 issues

The Good

  • 5-Star Staffing Rating · Excellent nurse staffing levels
  • 4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record
  • Staff turnover below average (40%)

    8 points below Wyoming average of 48%

Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, fire safety.

The Bad

Staff Turnover: 40%

Near Wyoming avg (46%)

Typical for the industry

The Ugly 7 deficiencies on record

Apr 2025 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, resident and staff interview, and policy and procedure review, the facility failed to ensure infection prevention practices were implemented during meal delivery during 2 of 3 me...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, resident and staff interview, and policy and procedure review, the facility failed to ensure infection prevention practices were implemented during meal delivery during 2 of 3 meal observations in the main dining room. The census was 32. The findings were: 1. Observation on 4/22/25 from 4:48 PM showed dietary aide #1 was taking orders for the evening meal using a pen and pad of paper. After obtaining the orders the dietary aide returned to the kitchen and obtained milk, coffee, and hot water, and served the beverages to residents with her fingers touching the rims of the cups. Further observation showed the dietary aide continued to serve beverages to residents in the same manner without performing hand hygiene. 2. Interview on 4/22/25 at 10:55 AM during resident council with resident # 20 revealed staff handled the cups at the top when they served beverages at meals. 3. Observation on 4/23/25 at 12:33 PM showed CNA #1 carried a beverage cup to a resident with her palm covering the top of the cup and fingers wrapped around the sides of the cup. Further observation at 12:37 PM showed CNA #2 carried another resident's beverage cup in the same manner. 4. Observation on 4/23/25 at 12:36 PM showed dietary aide #2 carried hot plates to residents with her shirt sleeves wrapped over her hands. The sleeves made full contact with the eating surface of the plate. 5. Interview on 4/24/25 at 8:50 AM with the dietary manager revealed her expectation was for staff to hold cups at the bottom when beverages were served to residents. 6. Review of the facility policy titled Hand Hygiene, last revised 11/2022 showed Hand hygiene (using either alcohol-based hand rubs or soap and water) should be performed before and after each resident contact and after contact with a resident's belongings, environmental surfaces, and resident care equipment . 2. Hands must be thoroughly washed with soap and water: (20 sec. minimum scrub time) .b. Prior to handling food (preparation or assistance with meals) .
MINOR (C)

Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact

Staffing Data (Tag F0851)

Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents

Based on payroll-based journal (PBJ) staffing data report review, facility time clock records review, staff interview, and policy and procedure review, the facility failed to submit to CMS complete an...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on payroll-based journal (PBJ) staffing data report review, facility time clock records review, staff interview, and policy and procedure review, the facility failed to submit to CMS complete and accurate direct staffing information for 28 days out of a 10-month period (March 1, 2024 through December 31, 2024). The findings were: 1. Review of PBJ staffing data report for quarter 4 of fiscal year 2024 and quarter 1 of fiscal year 2025 showed the facility failed to ensure eight consecutive RN hours for 10 days, 8/18, 8/25, 9/1, 9/25, 9/28, 9/29, 10/5, 10/12, 10/20 and 10/26. Further review of the PBJ staffing data report showed the facility failed to have licensed nursing coverage 24 hours per day on 8/18, 8/24, 8/25, 8/31, 9/1, 9/2, 9/7, 9/8, 9/14, 9/15, 9/21, 9/22, 9/23, 9/24, 9/25, 9/27, 9/28, 9/29, 9/30, 10/1, 10/2, 10/5, 10/6, 10/12, 10/13, 10/19, 10/20 and 10/26. 2. Review of facility time clock records showed the facility did have at least eight consecutive RN hours and did have licensed nursing coverage 24 hours per day on the above-referenced dates; however, they were not reported. 3. Interview with financial controller #1 on 4/24/25 at 10:24 AM revealed salaried staff members including the DON and team leaders did not clock in on the facility time clocks. She revealed the shifts where a salaried RN was the only RN on duty were not being reported in the PBJ data. 4. Review of facility policy titled Nurse Staffing provided by the DON on 4/24/25 showed, There will always be eight consecutive hours covered by an RN each day. The DON, PCC, or Team Leader may serve as the RN for these eight hours . Night shift will have one licensed nurse who is responsible for medication pass, treatments and supervisor/charge nurse . The [previous] is used as a guidance for minimum staffing. More staff may be scheduled leading to lower resident-to-staff rations as schedule and staffing allow.
Feb 2024 5 deficiencies
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0578 (Tag F0578)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure an advanced directive was formulated for 1 of 16 residents (#25) reviewed. The findings were: 1. Review of the electro...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure an advanced directive was formulated for 1 of 16 residents (#25) reviewed. The findings were: 1. Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) showed resident #25 was listed as do not resuscitate (DNR). Further review of the medical record showed no evidence of an advanced directive signed by the resident or the resident's representative. 2. Interview on 2/27/24 at 2:21 PM with the NHA and the RAC confirmed the facility did not have a record of the DNR status of the resident.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0761 (Tag F0761)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, review of temperature log sheets, staff interview, and manufacturer's instructions, the facility failed to ensure the temperature of 1 of 1 medication storage refrigerator was mo...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, review of temperature log sheets, staff interview, and manufacturer's instructions, the facility failed to ensure the temperature of 1 of 1 medication storage refrigerator was monitored. The findings were: 1. Observation on 2/28/24 at 10:25 AM of the medication storage room showed a GE refrigerator contained medications for resident use which included Ozempic (a diabetic medication) and eye drops. The follow concerns were identified: a. Review of the temperature monitoring logs from 2/24/24 to 2/28/24 showed the facility failed to record the temperature of the medication storage refrigerator. b. Observation on 2/28/24 at 10:25 AM showed the thermometer inside the refrigerator read 32 degrees Fahrenheit. 2. Interview on 2/28/24 at 4:11 PM with the RAC revealed it was the facility's expectation the temperature of the medication storage refrigerator be monitored every shift and be recorded. 3. Review of the Temperature Ranges For GE Refrigerators with no date, provided by the facility on 2/29/24 at 12:38 PM showed The temperature ranges available .can vary depending on which model you have. However, in general, here's what you can expect:. the coldest setting 34 degrees Fahrenheit and 42 degrees Fahrenheit for the warmest setting with a default of 37 degrees. 4. According to https://www.ozempic.com/how-to-take/ozempic-pen.html?showisi=true&&utm_source=google&utm_medium=cpc&utm_term=storage%20ozempic&utm_campaign=1_All_Shared_BR_Branded_Specifics_2023&mkwid=s-dc_pcrid_676991889727_pkw_storage%20ozempic_pmt_p_slid__product_&pgrid=158457156870&ptaid=kwd-450547815488&gad_source=1&gclid=CjwKCAiAxaCvBhBaEiwAvsLmWA2ppY3FA1OKj4n6UpEAzmPLZfnDsX_O4tvOjCzi7Aw8RF6KM1YmuhoC38EQAvD_BwE&gclsrc=aw.ds retrieved on 3/6/24 at 11:23 AM showed: How to store your Ozempic® pen . Store your new, unused Ozempic® pens in the refrigerator between 36°F to 46°F (2°C to 8°C) and Do not freeze Ozempic®. Do not use Ozempic® if it has been frozen.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0883 (Tag F0883)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policies and CDC immunization recommendations, the facil...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on medical record review, staff interview, and review of facility policies and CDC immunization recommendations, the facility failed to ensure residents were offered pneumococcal immunizations based on CDC recommendations for 2 of 5 sample residents (#7, #20) reviewed for immunizations. The findings were: 1. Review of the medical record showed resident #7 was [AGE] years old. Further review showed the resident received the pneumococcal 13 valent conjugate (PCV13) on 2/1/18. There was no evidence the resident was offered a pneumococcal immunization since the last administration in 2018. 2. Review of the medical record showed resident #20 was [AGE] years old. Further review showed the resident received the PCV13 on 10/28/14. There was no evidence the resident was offered a pneumococcal immunization since the last administration in 2014. 3. Interview with the NHA on 2/28/24 at 5:53 PM revealed the facility followed CDC recommendations for immunizations and confirmed there was no evidence resident #7 or resident #20 were offered pneumococcal immunizations in accordance with CDC guidelines. 4. Review of the facility's policy Pneumococcal Immunization, effective 10/9/07, showed 1. Upon admission and annually, resident's immunization history will be obtained, including compliance with current CDC recommendations for pneumococcal vaccination . 5. According to the Adult Immunization Schedule by Age by CDC located at https://www.cdc gov/vaccines/schedules/hcp/adult.html (accessed on 3/12/24) showed individuals 65 years or older who previously received only the PCV13 vaccine should receive 1 dose of either the PCV20 or PCVS23 vaccine at least 1 year after the last PCV13 dose.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0583 (Tag F0583)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observation, staff interview, and policy and procedure review, the facility failed to ensure residents' private health information was protected for 3 out of 16 (#11, #19, #26) resident rooms...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, staff interview, and policy and procedure review, the facility failed to ensure residents' private health information was protected for 3 out of 16 (#11, #19, #26) resident rooms observed and during multiple random observations of the medication cart. The census was 28. The findings were: 1. Random observation on 2/26/24 from 4 PM to 6 PM showed LPN #1 left the medication cart unattended (not in the vicinity) several times with private medical information observable on the computer screen (EMR) which included the resident's name, medication, medication dose, and administration time, and was visible for unauthorized people to read. Staff from different departments, visitors, and other residents were noted to pass by the medication cart during this timeframe. 2. Observation on 2/27/24 at 8:03 AM showed LPN #2 left the medication cart with the EMR visible and unsecured in the dining room. 3. Observation on 2/28/24 at 9:21 AM showed LPN #1 had left the medication cart unsecured with visible EMR in the intersection of the 100 and 200 hallways. 4. Observation on 2/28/24 showed residents (#11, #19, #26) had their care plans pinned to the cork board immediately upon entrance into each of the resident's rooms and visible from the hallway. The information included the resident's birth date, medications, their incontinence status, transfer requirements and wound information. 5. Interview on 2/28/24 at 4:52 PM with the RAC confirmed the resident care plans should have been located inside the resident's closet and not pinned to the cork board. 6. Interview on 2/29/24 at 11:12 AM with the RAC, while observing EMR unsecured information on the medication cart, revealed it was the facility's expectation to follow HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act) policies. 7. Review of the facility policy titled HIPAA 0042, dated April 14, 2003 showed: 1. The purpose of this policy is to maintain an adequate level of security to protect patient, resident, client and facility information from unauthorized access .
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, staff interview, review of the dishwasher and refrigerator/freezer temperature log sheets, manufacturer's ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, staff interview, review of the dishwasher and refrigerator/freezer temperature log sheets, manufacturer's instructions, hot and cold food temperature logs, policy and procedures, and the 2022 FDA Food Code, the facility failed to ensure a sanitary environment in 1 of 1 kitchen and failed to ensure temperatures were monitored for 5 of 5 refrigerator/freezers which stored food for resident use outside of the kitchen (downstairs pantry, upstairs pantry, 100 hallway, 200 hallway, and 400 hallway). The census was 28. The findings were: Related to temperature monitoring of food storage units: 1. Review of the December 2023, the January 2024, and February 2024 temperature monitoring log sheets for food storage areas outside of the kitchen showed the following concerns: a. Review of the downstairs pantry refrigerator/freezer log sheets showed the temperature of the refrigerator/freezer was to be checked by the evening shift CNA daily. The facility was unable to locate the December log sheet. The January log sheet showed 6 out of 31 days and the February log sheet showed 7 out of 27 days that failed to include documentation of the temperature of the refrigerator/freezer. In addition, the January log sheet showed 22 days and the February log sheet showed 7 days where the temperature of the freezer was not documented. b. Review of the upstairs pantry refrigerator/freezer log sheets showed the temperature of the refrigerator/freezer was to be checked by the evening shift CNA daily. The facility was unable to locate the December log sheet. The January log sheet showed 6 out of 31 days and the February log sheet showed 4 out of 27 days that failed to include documentation of the temperature of the refrigerator/freezer. In addition, the January log sheet showed 5 days and the February log sheet showed 1 day where the temperature of the freezer was not documented. c. Observation on 2/28/24 at 4:19 PM showed a small Midea refrigerator was located in the 200 hallway which contained drinks and snacks for resident consumption. There was no evidence the facility monitored the temperature of the refrigerator. d. Observation on 2/28/24 at 4:21 PM showed a small GE refrigerator was located in the 100 hallway which contained drinks and snacks for resident consumption. There was no evidence the facility monitored the temperature of the refrigerator. e. Observation on 2/28/24 at 4:25 PM showed a small Hanai refrigerator was located in the 400 hallway which contained drinks and snacks for resident consumption. There was no evidence the facility monitored the temperature of the refrigerator. f. Interview on 2/28/24 at 12:10 PM with team leader #2 revealed she was unable to locate the December 2023 log sheets for the downstairs and upstairs pantry refrigerator/freezers. g. Interview on 2/28/24 at 4:17 PM with the RAC revealed a system had not been developed to monitor the small refrigerators in the resident common rooms. In addition, the RAC confirmed the temperature log sheets were incomplete. 2. Review of the December 2023, the January 2024, and February 2024 CC Cooling Unit Temp Log sheets showed columns to record the temperature of the Cook's Fridge, the A la Carte Top & Bottom, the Office Fridge & Freezer, the Double Fridge, the Single Fridge, the Single Freezer, the Double Freezer, and the White Freezer used for food storage equipment inside the kitchen. The following concerns were identified: a. Review of the December 2023 temperature log sheet showed 10 days when the temperature of the food storage equipment was not recorded. b. Review of the January 2024 temperature log sheet showed 5 days when the temperature of the food storage equipment was not recorded. c. Review of the February 2024 temperature log sheet showed 4 out of 27 days where the temperature of the food storage equipment was not recorded. d. Interview with the dietitian on 2/28/24 at 4:30 PM revealed it was her expectation the temperature of the food storage equipment be monitored daily. 3. Review of the policy and procedure titled PREPARING AND HOLDING FOOD last reviewed in 2019, showed POLICY: The use of proper techniques for preparation and holding of foods. Adherence to established sanitation practices in food service and holding, to protect foods from contamination and reduce the potential for food borne illness outbreak. PROCEDURE: .9. Cold food items are refrigerated at 41 degrees or below . 4. According to the 2022 FDA Food Code 2-103.11 Person in Charge. The PERSON IN CHARGE shall ensure that .(J) FOOD EMPLOYEES are properly maintaining the temperature of TIME/TEMPERATURE CONTROL FOR SAFETY FOODS during thawing through daily oversight of the FOOD EMPLOYEE'S routine monitoring of FOOD temperatures . Related to the sanitary environment of the kitchen: 1. Observation on 2/27/24 at 8 AM showed cook #1 was preparing made to order breakfast for residents in the facility kitchen. The cook was not wearing a beard restraint over his facial hair. Interview with the cook on 2/27/24 at 8:18 AM revealed he had not received any education related to wearing a beard restraint while preparing or serving food. Interview on 2/28/24 at 4:30 PM with the dietitian revealed it was her expectation kitchen staff with facial hair wear a beard restraint while preparing and serving food. 2. Observation on 2/27/24 at 8:07 AM showed cook #1 removed a glove from his left hand and used hand sanitizer before donning a new glove. Interview with the cook at 8:18 AM revealed he used hand sanitizer after removing his gloves unless his hands were visibly soiled and then he would wash them with soap and water. The hand sanitizer used was 3M Avagard and was labeled as healthcare personnel hand sanitizer. Interview with the dietitian on 2/28/24 at 4:30 PM confirmed hand sanitizer should not be used in the kitchen and removed the bottle at that time. 3. Observation on 2/26/24 at 4:04 PM showed the Traulsen freezer had opened original bags, of what appeared to be breaded meat, which was not labeled with an open or expiration date. The Continental freezer showed multiple plastic bags, with what appeared to be breaded meats, which were not labeled with an open date or an expiration date. The [NAME] upright freezer showed multiple plastic bags, both original and resealable, which were unlabeled and undated and had what appeared to be a build-up of frost. Interview with the dietitian on 2/28/24 at 4:30 PM revealed opened frozen food should be transferred to a storage bag and labeled with the open date and an expiration date of 6 months. The dietitian was unable to locate a food storage guide for staff to reference. 4. Observation on 2/26/24 at 4:04 PM showed the kitchen contained a [NAME] high-temperature dishwashing machine. Review of the December 2023, January 2024, and February 2024 CC Dishmachine Temps log sheets showed the temperature of the wash and rinse water was to be measured 3 times per day. Review of the [NAME] dishmachine manufacturer's instructions showed the minimum wash temperature was 150 degrees Fahrenheit and the minimum rinse temperature was 180 degrees Fahrenheit. The following concerns were identified: a. Review of the temperature log sheets showed the required temperature of the wash and rinse water was not documented on the form. b. Review of the December 2023 log sheet showed the temperature of the wash and rinse water was not checked 28 out of 93 opportunities. Of the 65 recorded temperatures the wash water was below 150 degrees Fahrenheit 41 times and the temperature of the rinse water was below 180 degrees Fahrenheit 21 times. c. Review of the January 2024 log sheet showed the temperature of the wash and rinse water was not checked 9 out of 93 opportunities. Of the 84 recorded temperatures the wash water was below 150 degrees Fahrenheit 38 times and the temperature of the rinse water was below 180 degrees Fahrenheit 14 times. d. Review of the February 2024 log sheet showed the temperature of the wash and rinse water was not checked 23 out of 77 opportunities. Of the 54 recorded temperatures of the wash water it was below 150 degrees Fahrenheit 26 times and the temperature of the rinse water was below 180 degrees 2 times. e. Interview with dietary aide #1 on 2/27/24 at 8:15 AM revealed she was not aware of what the temperature ranges for the dishwasher were supposed to be and only recorded the results. The dietary aide stated she had been an employee for approximately 1 month. f. Interview with the dietitian on 2/28/24 at 4:30 PM revealed it was her expectation the temperature of the wash and rinse water be monitored as directed on the log sheet. In addition, the dietitian confirmed the temperature ranges of the wash and rinse water were not readily available for staff to reference. 5. Interview on 2/27/24 at 8:18 AM with cook #1 revealed breakfast was served from 6 AM to 9 AM and was the only meal which was prepared in the facility. The hospital kitchen prepared the noon and evening meals for the residents. The hospital was located across the parking lot and the food was brought to the facility via an enclosed foodservice cart and placed on the steam table. The following concerns were identified: a. Review of the January 2024 food temperature log showed 82 out of 93 opportunities failed to show documentation of the food's temperature before it was served to residents. b. Review of the February 2024 food temperature log showed 64 out of 72 opportunities failed to show documentation of the food's temperature before it was served to residents. c. Review of the December 2023, January 2024, and February 2024 Cool Check Temp Log which was used to monitor the temperature of the juice and milk which was kept outside of the storage units during each meal. The December log sheet showed 58 out of 93 opportunities had not been recorded. The January log sheet showed 37 of 93 opportunities had not been recorded. The February log sheet showed 57 out of 78 opportunities had not been recorded. d. Observation and interview with dietary aide #1 on 2/27/24 at 8:15 AM showed the dietary aide was checking the temperature of the juice and the milk. The dietary aide stated she was unaware of when the temperature of the cold liquids should be taken and did not know where the temperatures were recorded. e. Interview with the dietitian on 2/28/24 at 4:30 PM revealed it was her expectation the temperature of the cold liquids should be obtained prior to being placed back into storage after the meal service, and the temperature of food items should be taken prior to meal service. 6. Review of the policy and procedure titled Food Service Uniforms/Grooming, last revised in 2019, showed Policy: To establish and maintain a high standard of cleanliness .Procedure: 1. Hair must be clean and neatly groomed while on duty .Hair needs to be secured in a surgical cap or hair net. 2. Mustaches should be kept to moderate length and well trimmed. Extremely long or full mustaches will not be permitted. 7. Review of the 2022 FDA Food Code showed 2-402 Hair Restraints 2-402.11 Effectiveness. (A) Except as provided in (B) of this section, FOOD EMPLOYEES shall wear hair restraints such as hats, hair coverings or nets, beard restraints, and clothing that covers body hair, that are designed and worn to effectively keep their hair from contacting exposed FOOD; clean EQUIPMENT, UTENSILS, and LINENS; and unwrapped SINGLE-SERVICE and SINGLE-USE ARTICLES. 8. According to the 2022 FDA Food Code showed 2-301.16 Hand Antiseptics. In the 2005 Food Code, the use of the term hand sanitizer was replaced by the term hand antiseptic to eliminate confusion with the term sanitizer, a defined term in the Food Code, and to more closely reflect the terminology used in the FDA Tentative Final Monograph for Health-Care Antiseptic Drug Products for OTC Human Use, Federal Register: June 17, 1994. In addition, 2-301.16 Hand Antiseptics (A) A hand antiseptic used as a topical application, a hand antiseptic solution used as a hand dip, or a hand antiseptic soap shall: (1) Comply with one of the following: (a) Be an APPROVED drug that is listed in the FDA publication Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations as an APPROVED drug based on safety and effectiveness; (b) Have active antimicrobial ingredients that are listed in the FDA monograph for OTC Health-Care Antiseptic Drug Products as an antiseptic handwash, . 9. According to the 2022 FDA Food Code showed 2-301.14 When to Wash. FOOD EMPLOYEES shall clean their hands and exposed portions of their arms as specified under § 2-301.12 immediately before engaging in FOOD preparation including working with exposed FOOD, clean EQUIPMENT and UTENSILS, and unwrapped SINGLE-SERVICE and SINGLE-USE ARTICLES and: (A) After touching bare human body parts other than clean hands and clean, exposed portions of arms; (B) After using the toilet room; (C) After caring for or handling SERVICE ANIMALS or aquatic animals as specified in 2-403.11(B); (D) Except as specified in 2-401.11(B), after coughing, sneezing, using a handkerchief or disposable tissue, using TOBACCO PRODUCTS, eating, or drinking; (E) After handling soiled EQUIPMENT or UTENSILS; (F) During FOOD preparation, as often as necessary to remove soil and contamination and to prevent cross contamination when changing tasks; (G) When switching between working with raw FOOD and working with READY-TO-EAT FOOD; (H) Before donning gloves to initiate a task that involves working with FOOD; and (I) After engaging in other activities that contaminate the hands. 10. Review of the 2022 FDA Food Code showed 4-703.11 Hot Water and Chemical. Efficacious sanitization depends on warewashing being conducted within certain parameters. Time is a parameter applicable to both chemical and hot water sanitization. The time hot water or chemicals contact utensils or food-contact surfaces must be sufficient to destroy pathogens that may remain on surfaces after cleaning. Other parameters, such as rinse pressure, temperature, and chemical concentration are used in combination with time to achieve sanitization. When surface temperatures of utensils passing through warewashing machines using hot water for sanitizing do not reach the required 71ºC (160ºF), it is important to understand the factors affecting the decreased surface temperature. A comparison should be made between the machine manufacturer's operating instructions and the machine's actual wash and rinse temperatures and final rinse pressure. The actual temperatures and rinse pressure should be consistent with the machine manufacturer's operating instructions and within limits specified in §§ 4-501.112 and 4-501.113. If either the temperature or pressure of the final rinse spray is higher than the specified upper limit, spray droplets may disperse and begin to vaporize resulting in less heat delivery to utensil surfaces. Temperatures below the specified limit will not convey the needed heat to surfaces. Pressures below the specified limit will result in incomplete coverage of the heat-conveying sanitizing rinse across utensil surfaces. 11. Review of the policy and procedure titled PREPARING AND HOLDING FOODS, last reviewed in 2019, showed PROCEDURE .11. Food Items (sic) will be prepared in batches and placed on the tray line no more than 1/2 hour prior to meal service. Temperatures of foods in heated holding units are recorded previous to service of each meal, and recorded on each hour the food is held in heated holding units to insure (sic) the safety of food is maintained.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Grade A (90/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Wyoming.
  • • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
  • • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Wyoming facilities.
  • • 40% turnover. Below Wyoming's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
Concerns
  • • No significant concerns identified. This facility shows no red flags across CMS ratings, staff turnover, or federal penalties.
Bottom line: Generally positive indicators. Standard due diligence and a personal visit recommended.

About This Facility

What is Amie Holt Care Center's CMS Rating?

CMS assigns Amie Holt Care Center an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Wyoming, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.

How is Amie Holt Care Center Staffed?

CMS rates Amie Holt Care Center's staffing level at 5 out of 5 stars, which is much above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 40%, compared to the Wyoming average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.

What Have Inspectors Found at Amie Holt Care Center?

State health inspectors documented 7 deficiencies at Amie Holt Care Center during 2024 to 2025. These included: 6 with potential for harm and 1 minor or isolated issues.

Who Owns and Operates Amie Holt Care Center?

Amie Holt Care Center is owned by a government entity. Government-operated facilities are typically run by state, county, or municipal agencies. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 50 certified beds and approximately 32 residents (about 64% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in Buffalo, Wyoming.

How Does Amie Holt Care Center Compare to Other Wyoming Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Wyoming, Amie Holt Care Center's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 3.0, staff turnover (40%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Amie Holt Care Center?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"

Is Amie Holt Care Center Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, Amie Holt Care Center has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Wyoming. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.

Do Nurses at Amie Holt Care Center Stick Around?

Amie Holt Care Center has a staff turnover rate of 40%, which is about average for Wyoming nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.

Was Amie Holt Care Center Ever Fined?

Amie Holt Care Center has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.

Is Amie Holt Care Center on Any Federal Watch List?

Amie Holt Care Center is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.