Rocky Mountain Care - Evanston
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Rocky Mountain Care - Evanston has a Trust Grade of B, indicating it is a good choice among nursing homes. It ranks #3 out of 33 facilities in Wyoming, placing it in the top half, and is the only nursing home in Uinta County. The facility is improving, with issues decreasing from four in 2024 to one in 2025. Staffing is rated 4 out of 5, which suggests that staff generally stay, helping maintain continuity of care, although the turnover rate is 52%, which is average for the state. However, it has faced some serious incidents, including a resident suffering a significant fracture during a transfer that did not follow their care plan and a case of verbal abuse from a staff member towards another resident. These incidents highlight some areas of concern, but the facility has taken corrective actions to address the issues.
- Trust Score
- B
- In Wyoming
- #3/33
- Safety Record
- Moderate
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 52% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- $13,176 in fines. Lower than most Wyoming facilities. Relatively clean record.
- Skilled Nurses ✓ Good
- Each resident gets 46 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than average for Wyoming. RNs are trained to catch health problems early.
- Violations ○ Average
- 8 deficiencies on record. Average for a facility this size. Mostly minor or procedural issues.
The Good
-
4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
-
5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
Near Wyoming avg (46%)
Higher turnover may affect care consistency
Below median ($33,413)
Minor penalties assessed
The Ugly 8 deficiencies on record
Mar 2025
1 deficiency
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
Based on medical record review, review of the facility investigation report, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a safe transfer was provided for 1 of 7 sample residents (#1) reviewed f...
Read full inspector narrative →
Sept 2024
1 deficiency
1 Harm
SERIOUS
(G)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures
Free from Abuse/Neglect
(Tag F0600)
A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on medical record review, resident and staff interview, facility incident review, and policy and procedure review, the fac...
Read full inspector narrative →
Aug 2024
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Transfer Notice
(Tag F0623)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide a written notice of the transfer to the resid...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0645
(Tag F0645)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a level II PASARR [preadmission screening and ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0847
(Tag F0847)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that the binding arbitration agreement explicitly stated that the resident or their representative was not required to...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jun 2023
1 deficiency
MINOR
(B)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Staffing Information
(Tag F0732)
Minor procedural issue · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, review of nurse staffing postings, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the nurse staffing posting included the census and total number of staff worked per shift. T...
Read full inspector narrative →
May 2022
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Menu Adequacy
(Tag F0803)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, review of menus, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure menus were followed as planned for 1 of 1 meal preparation and service observation (noon meal on 5/18/22). The...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, staff interview, and review of the US Food Code, the facility failed to ensure the food storage equipment was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner in 1 of 1 kitchens. The ce...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
- • 8 deficiencies on record, including 2 serious (caused harm) violations. Ask about corrective actions taken.
- • $13,176 in fines. Above average for Wyoming. Some compliance problems on record.
About This Facility
What is Rocky Mountain Care - Evanston's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns Rocky Mountain Care - Evanston an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Wyoming, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Rocky Mountain Care - Evanston Staffed?
CMS rates Rocky Mountain Care - Evanston's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 52%, compared to the Wyoming average of 46%.
What Have Inspectors Found at Rocky Mountain Care - Evanston?
State health inspectors documented 8 deficiencies at Rocky Mountain Care - Evanston during 2022 to 2025. These included: 2 that caused actual resident harm, 5 with potential for harm, and 1 minor or isolated issues. Deficiencies causing actual harm indicate documented cases where residents experienced negative health consequences.
Who Owns and Operates Rocky Mountain Care - Evanston?
Rocky Mountain Care - Evanston is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 60 certified beds and approximately 45 residents (about 75% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in EVANSTON, Wyoming.
How Does Rocky Mountain Care - Evanston Compare to Other Wyoming Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Wyoming, Rocky Mountain Care - Evanston's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 3.0, staff turnover (52%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Rocky Mountain Care - Evanston?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is Rocky Mountain Care - Evanston Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, Rocky Mountain Care - Evanston has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Wyoming. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Rocky Mountain Care - Evanston Stick Around?
Rocky Mountain Care - Evanston has a staff turnover rate of 52%, which is 6 percentage points above the Wyoming average of 46%. Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Rocky Mountain Care - Evanston Ever Fined?
Rocky Mountain Care - Evanston has been fined $13,176 across 2 penalty actions. This is below the Wyoming average of $33,211. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Rocky Mountain Care - Evanston on Any Federal Watch List?
Rocky Mountain Care - Evanston is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.