KNOLLWOOD HEALTHCARE

3151-A KNOLLWOOD DRIVE, MOBILE, AL 36693 (251) 661-7608
For profit - Limited Liability company 71 Beds EPHRAM LAHASKY Data: November 2025 8 Immediate Jeopardy citations
Trust Grade
0/100
Last Inspection: March 2025

Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.

Overview

Knollwood Healthcare in Mobile, Alabama, has received a Trust Grade of F, indicating significant concerns about the facility's overall quality and care. It currently ranks at the bottom of the state and county listings, meaning there are no comparable options that are worse. The facility is reportedly improving, as the number of issues decreased from 22 in 2024 to 15 in 2025. However, staffing is a major concern, with a turnover rate of 76%, significantly higher than the state average, which can affect resident care continuity. The facility has incurred $316,228 in fines, the highest in Alabama, suggesting ongoing compliance problems. While there is good RN coverage, exceeding 75% of state facilities, recent inspections revealed serious issues, including a failure to administer medications as prescribed and lack of access to necessary documentation during a storm, which put residents at risk. Families should weigh these strengths and weaknesses carefully when considering this facility for their loved ones.

Trust Score
F
0/100
In Alabama
#112/223
Top 50%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Getting Better
22 → 15 violations
Staff Stability
⚠ Watch
76% turnover. Very high, 28 points above average. Constant new faces learning your loved one's needs.
Penalties
⚠ Watch
$316,228 in fines. Higher than 97% of Alabama facilities. Major compliance failures.
Skilled Nurses
✓ Good
Each resident gets 47 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than average for Alabama. RNs are trained to catch health problems early.
Violations
⚠ Watch
39 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
☆☆☆☆☆
0.0
Overall Rating
☆☆☆☆☆
0.0
Staff Levels
☆☆☆☆☆
0.0
Care Quality
☆☆☆☆☆
0.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2024: 22 issues
2025: 15 issues

The Good

  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record

Facility shows strength in fire safety.

The Bad

Staff Turnover: 76%

30pts above Alabama avg (46%)

Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity

Federal Fines: $316,228

Well above median ($33,413)

Significant penalties indicating serious issues

Chain: EPHRAM LAHASKY

Part of a multi-facility chain

Ask about local staffing decisions and management

Staff turnover is very high (76%)

28 points above Alabama average of 48%

The Ugly 39 deficiencies on record

8 life-threatening 4 actual harm
May 2025 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, resident record review, the facility investigative file, and a facility policy titled, Abuse Policy, the fa...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, resident record review, the facility investigative file, and a facility policy titled, Abuse Policy, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse on 04/30/2025 when Resident Identifier (RI) #2 hit RI #21. The facility's staff failed to supervise RI #2 and intervene to prevent the incident. RI #2 had a history of verbal and physical behaviors. RI #2 was observed irritable, cursing, and upset as staff were attempting to take RI #2 to his/her bed. The Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) left RI #2 at his/her doorway and another CNA witnessed RI #2 hit RI #21 on the arm. Staff said someone in that situation being hit would feel shocked. This deficient practice affected RI #21 one of three residents sampled for abuse and was cited as a result of the investigation of complaint/report number AL00051090. Findings include: On 04/30/2025 at 3:58 PM the State Agency received a Facility Reported Incident (FRI) alleging RI #2 hit RI #21 with a closed fist and cursed RI #21. RI #21 had no injury, the residents were separated, RI #2 was sent out to the emergency department, and notifications were made to Resident Representatives and doctor. Review of the facility's abuse policy titled Abuse Policy, updated 08/2022 revealed the following: Our residents have the right to be free from abuse . Policy Interpretation and Implementation Definitions To help with recognition of incidents of abuse, the following definitions of abuse are provided: 1. Abuse is defined as the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish. Prevention . 1. The facility's goal is to achieve and maintain an abuse-free environment. 2. Our abuse prevention/intervention program includes, but is not necessarily limited to, the following: 3. Training all staff . how to resolve conflicts appropriately; . 9. Training staff to understand and manage a resident's verbal or physical aggression; . 12. Assessing, care planning, and monitoring residents with needs and behaviors that may lead to conflict or neglect; . 13. Assessing residents with signs and symptoms of behavior problems and developing and implementing care plans to address behavioral issues; . The facility's investigative file contained a summary of the incident involving RI #2 and RI #21 signed by the Administrator (ADM) that documented: . Knollwood Healthcare reported an allegation of residents on resident abuse April 30, 2025. Statements gathered from the staff involved reported that they were trying to persuade (RI #2) to go to bed or lay down; (he/she) had said no several times, and they backed away. They brought (him/her) to (his/her) room, as they were rolling up to (his/her) room, (his/her) roommate (RI #21) was leaving (his/her) room. (RI #21) came out of the room trying to get by when (RI #2) hit (him/her). the facility will substantiate resident on resident abuse . RI #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] and had diagnoses to include: Severe Intellectual Disabilities and Anxiety Disorder. RI #2's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/08/2025 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of zero of 15, which indicated severely impaired cognition. RI #2's care plans were reviewed and included a plan of care initiated on 03/03/2020 with a revision date of 02/25/2025 addressing focus areas of verbal and physical behaviors such as: speech was usually unclear garbled unless he/she was cursing, was easily agitated, and history of combative behaviors; and a plan of care initiated on 05/13/2024 addressing focus areas of mood and behaviors including physically and verbally aggressive, verbal outbursts and fist shaking at staff to indicate he/she is upset. RI #2's care plans did not include any direction to staff regarding the level of supervision needed to keep other residents safe until after the incident on 04/30/2025. RI #21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] and had diagnoses to include: Adjustment Disorder with Depressed Mood, Vascular Dementia, and Major Depressive Disorder. RI #21's annual MDS assessment with an ARD of 03/04/2025 documented a BIMS score of 15 of 15, which indicated no impaired cognition. On 05/20/2025 at 3:44 PM RI #21 was asked about the incident on 04/30/2025 and RI #21 stated, he/she was trying to go out of the room and RI #2 started swinging at him/her and RI #21 put up his/her hand to block RI #2 from hitting him/her. RI #21 said, RI #2 hit him/her on the wrist. RI #21 stated, he/she was not hurt. RI #21 stated, RI #2 had fits when staff try to put RI #2 in the bed. On 05/21/2025 at 8:20 AM CNA #4, who was working at the time of the incident, was asked about the incident involving RI #2 and RI #21. CNA #4 recalled she pushed RI #2 to his/her room and RI #2 did not want to go to bed. CNA #4 said, she left the resident in front of the door and went to tell the nurse that RI #2 did not want to go to bed. CNA #4 said, when she returned to RI #2's room, CNA #5 told her RI #2 hit RI #21. On 05/21/2025 at 9:55 AM, a phone interview was conducted with CNA #5 who witnessed the incident between RI #2 and RI #21. CNA #5 said she recalled CNA #4 brought RI #2 to her/his room, and RI #2 was crying and did not want to go into the room. CNA #5 said, she saw RI #21 trying to come out of the room and raising his/her hands to block the hit from RI #2. On 05/21/2025 at 8:56 AM Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #6 was asked about the incident on 04/30/2025 and she stated RI #2 was in the dayroom, was getting irritable, so she asked CNA #4 to take RI #2 to his/her room to be changed, and about five minutes later CNA #5 came to the nurses station and told her there had been an altercation between RI #2 and RI #21. LPN #6 stated, she immediately went to the room and RI #2 was in the doorway of the room and RI #21 was in activity room. LPN #6 said, a body audit was conducted on both residents, RI #21 did not have any injuries. On 05/21/2025 at 10:05 AM, a follow-up phone interview was conducted with CNA #4. CNA #4 was asked why she left RI #2 at the doorway of her/his room. CNA #4 said, she went to tell LPN #6 that RI #2 would not go to bed. When asked what should she have done when she could not get RI #2 to go to bed, she said she should have brought RI #2 back to the day room. On 05/21/2025 at 3:32 PM, an interview was conducted with the Social Services Director (SSD). The SSD stated, she became aware of the incident between RI #2 and RI #21 during the investigation. The SSD said, she was told RI #2 was trying to go into the room, RI #21 was coming out of the room, RI #2 held his/her hand up and RI #21 blocked RI #2 from hitting him/her. The SSD said, they were separated, and CNA #4 reported the incident to LPN #6. The SSD stated, RI #2 was sent out to the hospital for a psychiatric evaluation. When asked how a reasonable person would feel about being hit, the SSD said, bad and shocked. On 05/21/2025 at 4:50 PM the Director of Nursing (DON) was interviewed about the incident that occurred between RI #2 and RI #21 on 04/30/2025. The DON was asked about RI #2's behaviors and stated RI #2 would curse and had triggers sometimes depending on what was going on at the moment. The DON said no one would like to be hit. The facility took the immediate action to correct the non-compliance; thus, past non-compliance was cited. ********************************************************************* The facility's immediate actions included: 04/30/2025 at 1:55 PM- Resident Altercation occurred, residents separated immediately, and nurse informed. 04/30/2025 2:05 PM- Administrator (ADM)-informed and investigation began 04/30/2025 at 2:07 PM-Mental health notified 04/30/2025 at 2:14 PM- Skin assessment completed on both residents 04/30/2025 at 2:15 PM SSD and ADM began resident interviews 04/30/2025 at 2:17 PM Doctor Notified, orders received to send RI #2 to Providence ER for Evaluation and treatment 04/30/2025 at 2:20 PM- Family notified 04/30/2025 at 2:50 PM Ambulance picked RI #2, Abuse Inservice started for staff for Resident on Resident abuse 04/30/2025 3:58 PM- Care plan updated for supervision of RI #2 04/30/2025 Notified ADPH 04/30/2025 at 8:07 PM RI #2 returned to facility and room move occurred. Behavior Monitoring Continued 05/01/25-3 Day SS Follow up began ADHOC QAPI 05/02/2025 PHQA Root Cause Analysis initiated 05/05/2025-Mental Health Visit 05/06/2025-5 Day Report Sent to ADPH
Mar 2025 14 deficiencies 4 IJ (4 facility-wide)
CRITICAL (L) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Notification of Changes (Tag F0580)

Someone could have died · This affected most or all residents

⚠️ Facility-wide issue

Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified when residents on the second and third floors did not receive their medications and treatments as ordered...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified when residents on the second and third floors did not receive their medications and treatments as ordered when the facility experienced an internet outage preventing access to the Electronic Health Record (EHR) system on 01/21/2025 and 01/22/2025. Nurses did not have access to pre-printed paper documentation forms such as physician orders and MARs (Medication Administration Record) to administer medications on 01/21/2025 and 01/22/2025. The facility staff failed to notify the Director of Nursing (DON), residents, and resident representatives of residents not receiving their ordered medications and treatments on 01/21/2025 and 01/22/2025. It was determined the facility's non-compliance with one or more requirements of participation had caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment, or death. The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was cited in reference to 483.10 Resident Rights. On 03/25/2025 at 4:15 PM, the Administrator (ADM), the Director of Nursing (DON), the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) and Executive Director of Operations were provided a copy of the IJ template and, notified of the finding of immediate jeopardy in the area of Resident Rights at F580-Notify of Changes (Injury/Decline/ Room, Etc.). The IJ began on 01/21/2025 and continued until 03/26/2025 when the facility implemented corrective action to remove the immediacy. On 03/27/2025 the immediate jeopardy was removed, F580 was lowered to the lower severity of no actual harm with a potential for more than minimal harm that was not immediate jeopardy, to allow the facility time to monitor and/or revise their corrective actions as necessary to achieve substantial compliance. This deficient practice affected residents on the second and third floors at the facility who were receiving medications. This deficiency was cited as the result of the investigation of complaint/report number AL00050173. Findings Include: Cross-Reference F600, F658 and F760. Review of the facility's After Action Report for the snowstorm January 21 to 23, 2025, documented the following: Knollwood Healthcare experienced an unusual snowstorm on January 21 to January 23, 2025 . We did have the modem go out for the computer Internet . On 03/19/2025 at 3:53 PM, a telephone interview was conducted with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #11, who was identified as a supervisor during the snowstorm on 01/21/2025. LPN #11 said she did remember when the facility's computer system was down during the snowstorm. LPN #11 said she was not sure if the residents received their medications or not. When asked if the DON or ADM knew the system was down, LPN #11 said she could not say yes or no whether they knew. When asked who would have been responsible for notifying them, LPN #11 said the supervisor. On 03/20/2025 at 11:00 AM, the surveyor conducted an interview with the DON. When asked what she could tell the surveyor about the medication system being down on 01/21/2025 and 01/22/2025 when there was a snowstorm, the DON said she was not at the facility during that time and did not recall anyone informing her the system was down. The DON said she was not notified the residents did not receive their medications on those days. The DON said on 01/22/2025 she sent a text to LPN #11 asking LPN #11 how things were going and LPN #11 texted back going, no issues. The DON said she did not know that the residents did not receive their medications during the snowstorm until 03/20/2025. On 03/21/2025 at 10:23 AM, the surveyor conducted an interview with the ADM. The ADM said the internet was down during the snowstorm back in January 2025. The ADM said he did not remember who informed him of this, but he told them to use the paper MARs. The ADM said he was not aware the residents did not receive their medications until he was made aware of this by the survey team. When asked if he should have been made aware that the residents did not receive their medications, the ADM said absolutely. On 03/22/2025 at 9:42 AM, a follow-up interview was conducted with the DON. The DON said she should have been notified when the residents did not receive their medications on 01/21/2025 and 01/22/2025. When asked who would have been the supervisor on 01/21/2025 and 01/22/2025, the DON said LPN #11. The DON said the physician also should have been notified. On 03/22/2025 at 10:18 AM, a telephone interview was conducted with the Physician/Medical Director (MD). The MD said back in January (2025) when there was a snowstorm in the area he was not informed that the facility's computer system was down and the residents did not receive their mediations. The MD said he would have liked to have been informed of this. When asked what were some of the things residents could potentially face when residents did not receive their medications as prescribed by their physician, the MD said it could be a blood pressure issues if the medication missed was for the blood pressure; it could be a clotting issues if the resident was on blood thinners; pain control could be an issue if the resident was on pain medication; and the blood sugar may be affected if insulin was not given as ordered. ********************************************************* On 03/26/2025, the facility submitted an acceptable removal plan, which documented: ********************************************************* 1) Process: To ensure that in the event of a power/internet outage the most updated Medical Record Administration (MAR) will be available for nurses that provide care to the residents: The medication administration Record (MAR) will be printed monthly by the Director of Nursing Assistant Director of Nursing or Unit Manager, by the 1st of each month. The paper MAR will be updated at the time the order is received or confirmed for all current resident and new admits by the RN/LPN who receives the order or confirms the new order for any medication changes including all new orders for new admits. The updated MAR will be located by the nursing stations. All, 100% of LPNs and RNs were in-serviced and completed on March 26th, 2025. Inservice was to ensure nurses know where the paper MAR is located and to update it as soon as a new admission or whenever the physician changes an order in the MAR. 2) In services On 3/20/2025 - 03/26/2025 the Director of Nursing and Assistant Director of Nursing began to educate all nurses, all physical therapy staff and administrative staff (receptionist, Admissions Coordinator, Staffing Coordinator and Human Resources) and provided the education with 1:1 in-service to LPN #14, RN #15, LPN #11, RN #20, and RN #16. The in-services included: a) the policy titled Policy on Computer or Internet Downtime and EHR, b) the standard of practice to: i) administer medication, ii) monitor blood glucose, iii) the implementation of the prescribing physicians' orders iv) the importance of documenting medication administration at the time of administration. c) Inservice included calling the physician as well as notify the Director of Nursing or Designee if staff including nurses are unable to carry out a physician's order. d) Inservice included how it led to neglect and the facility's Abuse Policy titled Abuse Policy. The in-service was completed on March 26th, 2025 for 21 of 21 nurses, 9/9 PT staff, 16/16 of administrative staff. On 3/26/2025, 21 of 21 of the nursing staff were all educated by the Director of Nursing or Assistant Director of Nursing and 1:1 in-service to LPN #14, RN #15, LPN #11, RN #20, and RN #16. The in-service included that a printed MAR will be ready for the 1st of each month. A copy of the paper MAR will be kept at each nurses' station for use during downtime. Education included that RNs and LPNs who receives an order or confirms a new order for any medication changes including all new orders for new admits will update the paper medication administration records at the time the order is received or confirmed for all current resident and new admits. The Administrator educated the Director of Nursing and the Assistant Director of Nursing on 03/26/2025 that both of them are responsible to print the paper MAR to be ready for the 1st of each month and will be placed by each of the nurse's station. A monthly MAR print out schedule was created for clarity. The education included that the DON and the ADON will confirm that an accurate MAR for all residents is printed and available for use in the event of a forecasted severe storm such as tropical depression, tropical storm, hurricane, or winter snow storm or other reason to expect downtime. A mock drill was conducted on 3/21/25 for the nursing personnel on shift. 2) Assessment Due to the failure of functionality of the router which caused the internet outage in the facility, the facility replaced the router on January 30th, 2025 through its internet provider. On 3/26/25 The entire Medical Record Administration was reprinted in the event of outage and nurses were all educated that any medication changes or new admissions will need to be updated in the paper medical administration records. All residents that had the potential of being affected by this deficient practice from January 21st 2025 to January 22nd 2025. A report was generated from the electronic medical records to see which residents could have been affected during 1/21/25 - 1/22/25. There was a total of 56 of 56 residents were assessed by the medical director and completed on March 26th, 2025. No adverse effects were identified by the physician due to this deficient practice and no recommendations were made. 2) Quality Assurance An ad-hoc Quality Assurance meeting which included the entire IDT team ( Director of Nursing, Administrator, Rehab Director, Business Office Manager, Social Worker Director, Governing Body, Medical Director, Business Office Manager, Assistant Director of Nursing, Staffing Coordinator, Unit Manager, Dietary Director, Admissions Director) was conducted on March 25, 2025 in response to F600, F658, F580, and F760 to discuss the deficient practice and plan of correction. The nurses that were responsible were immediately educated about the in-proper practice that led to F600, F658, F580, and F760 and on the Policy on Computer or Internet Downtime and EHR access. The QA team discussed the needed in services/education for LPN #14, RN #15, LPN #11, RN #20, and RN #16. This plan was completed on March 26th, 2025. ******************************************************* After review of the information provided in the facility's Removal Plan, in-service/education records, as well as staff interviews, and observations, the survey team determined the facility implemented the immediate corrective actions as of 03/26/2025.
CRITICAL (L) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Someone could have died · This affected most or all residents

⚠️ Facility-wide issue

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, record review and review of facility policies titled, Abuse Policy and Policy on Computer or Internet Downt...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, record review and review of facility policies titled, Abuse Policy and Policy on Computer or Internet Downtime and EHR (Electronic Health Record) Access, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from neglect when systems were not in place to ensure continuity of care and operations when the facility experienced a forecasted winter storm which caused internet outage preventing access to the EHR system on 01/21/2025 and 01/22/2025. The facility failed to ensure pre-printed paper documentation forms such as physician orders and MARs were available and accessible for the licensed nursing staff to utilize for resident care, treatment, and medication administration prior to the internet outage. The nurses and nurse supervisor on duty during that time failed to ensure residents received medications as ordered by the physician. Residents residing on the second floor and third floor did not receive their medications on 01/21/2025 and 01/22/2025 as ordered. The staff further failed to notify management staff or the residents' physician of their inability to safely administer. It was determined the facility's non-compliance with one or more requirements of participation had caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment, or death. The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was cited in reference to 483.12 Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation. On 03/25/2025 at 4:15 PM, the Administrator (ADM), the Director of Nursing (DON), the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), and Executive Director of Operations were provided a copy of the IJ template and notified of the finding of immediate jeopardy substandard quality of care in the area of Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation at F600- Free from Abuse and Neglect. The IJ began on 01/21/2025 and continued until 03/26/2025 when the facility implemented corrective action to remove the immediacy. On 03/27/2025 the immediate jeopardy was removed, F 600 was lowered to the lower severity of no actual harm with a potential for more than minimal harm that was not immediate jeopardy, to allow the facility time to monitor and/or revise their corrective actions as necessary to achieve substantial compliance. This deficient practice affected all residents at the facility who received medications. This deficiency was cited as the result of the investigation of complaint/report number AL00050173. The facility further failed to protect Resident Identifier (RI) #15's right to be free from verbal abuse perpetrated by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #10. Specifically, on 01/30/2025, the facility failed to ensure RI #15 was not verbally abused by CNA #10, who stated she was tired and frustrated from working a double the day before, and who called RI #15 a stupid mother fucker while providing assistance to RI #15 who needed assistance to stand. RI #15 said, he/she was shocked when CNA #10 spoke to him/her that way. This deficient practice was cited as the result of the investigation of complaint/report number AL00050214 and affected RI #15, one of three residents sampled for abuse, and did not rise to the jeopardy level. Findings Include: 1) Cross-Reference F580, F658 and F760. Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse Policy, updated 08/2022, revealed the following: Our residents have the right to be free from . neglect . Policy Interpretation and Implementation Definitions . 9. Neglect is defined as the failure of the facility, its employees or service providers to provide goods and services to a resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish or emotional distress. Neglect occurs when the facility is aware of, or should have been aware of, goods or services that a resident(s) requires but the facility fails to provide them to the resident(s) . Neglect includes cases where the facility's indifference or disregard for resident care, comfort, or safety, resulted in or could have resulted in, physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress. Neglect may be the result of a pattern of failures or may be the result of one or more failures involving one resident and one staff person. Examples of individual failures include, but are not limited, to the following: . Failure to provide supervision and/or monitoring of the delivery and implementation of care; . Failure to provide orientation and/or training to staff; Failure to provide trained on . new procedures . required for the care of a specified resident or required due to changes in standards of practice; Failure to oversee the implementation of resident care policies; Failure to identify, assess, and/or contact a physician and/or prescriber for an acute change in condition, and/or a change in condition that require the plan of care to be revised to meet the resident's needs in a timely manner; Failure to implement effective communication systems across all shifts for communicating necessary care and information between staff, practitioners, and resident representatives . On 03/19/2025 at 3:09 PM, a telephone interview was conducted with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #14, the licensed staff member assigned to work the Second Floor (back hall cart) on 01/21/2025 on the 2:00 PM to 10:00 PM shift. LPN #14 said one specific night the computer system at the facility was not working and was down because of a storm. When asked how she passed medications that evening, LPN #14 said she was not able to pass medications. LPN #14 said LPN #11 was the Second Floor supervisor at that time and when she informed LPN #11 that she was not able to pass medications, LPN #11 said she did not know what to do. On 03/21/2025 at 11:33 AM a follow-up interview was conducted with LPN #14 who said she was not aware the facility had paper MARs at the time of the storm on 01/21/2025. On 03/22/2025 at 1:43 PM, a follow-up telephone interview was conducted with LPN #14. LPN #14 said in addition to not being able to pass medications when the internet was down on 01/21/2025, she was not able to perform capillary blood glucose (CBG) monitoring checks because she did not know who needed them. LPN #14 said she did not feel comfortable to administer anything without the MAR. When asked about how many CBG checks she thought she had on her cart, LPN #14 said two to four. On 03/19/2025 at 9:50 AM an interview was conducted with RI #308's family member (FM). The FM said RI #308 did not receive his/her seizure medication as ordered while a resident. The FM said it was concerning because RI #308 had a very short window to take his/her seizure medications. The FM said before RI #308 was admitted to the facility he/she had received all of his/her medications for seizures except for two since his/her accident in 2019. The FM identified LPN #14 as the nurse that did not administer RI #308's medications as ordered. On 03/21/2025 at 11:58 AM, a telephone interview was conducted with Registered Nurse (RN) #15, the licensed staff member assigned to work the Second Floor (front hall cart) on 01/21/2025 on the 6:00 AM to 2:00 PM and 2:00 PM to 10:00 PM shift. RN #15 said she was able to pass medications that morning, but something happened that she could not administer medications that evening. RN #15 said she was hired in January and was not told to use the paper MARs if there was an internet outage. RN #15 said she informed LPN #11 she was not able to administer medications to residents. RN #15 said LPN #11 did not tell her what to do. RN #15 said when the snowstorm occurred back in January 2025, LPN #11 did not inform her to use the residents' paper MARs. On 03/19/2025 at 3:53 PM, a telephone interview was conducted with LPN #11, the LPN supervisor. LPN #11 said she did remember when the facility's computer system went down back in January of 2025 when a snowstorm hit. The surveyor asked LPN #11 if the system was down, how did the residents receive their scheduled medications. LPN #11 said on that shift there were new nurses and nothing could be printed out for the new nurse to use to give the medications by. When asked did the residents receive their medications, LPN #11 said she was not sure. LPN #11 said she did not recall anyone reporting to her that the residents did not get their medications. LPN #11 said there should have been a backup plan in place to ensure the residents received their medications. When asked did the DON and ADM know the system was down, LPN #11 said she could not say yes or no if they knew. On 03/21/2025 at 12:36 PM, a follow-up telephone interview was conducted with LPN #11 who said she could not get into the computer to print the paper MARs to give to the nurses and she could not find the paper MARs in the binder. LPN #11 said she did not recall telling the new nurses about the paper MARs because she could not print them. When asked who would have been responsible for ensuring the paper MARs were in the binder, LPN #11 said the unit manager. LPN #11 said it would be important to ensure the paper MARs were in the binders to make sure the nurses had something to give medications by if there was an internet outage. On 03/24/2025 at 11:16 AM, a telephone interview was conducted with RN #16, the licensed staff member working on the Third Floor on 01/21/2025 on the 2:00 PM to 10:00 PM and 10:00 PM to 6:00 AM shifts; and working on the Second Floor on 01/22/2025 on the 2:00 PM to 10:00 PM and 10:00 PM to 6:00 AM shifts. RN #16 said the paper MARs were kept on the unit near the nurses' station and during the downtime she did not see the paper MARs. When asked did she report to anyone that she could not find the paper MARs, RN #16 said she could not remember if she did or not. RN #16 said if anyone CBG required monitoring such as a sliding scale, she could not provide that because she did not have the paper MAR or eMAR to see who needed CBG checks. When asked what was the rationale for having preprinted MARs, RN #16 said in case of an emergency like the internet going down of if there was a power outage the nurses would have a place to document that the medications had been given. On 03/20/2025 at 4:49 PM an interview was conducted with LPN #18 who recalled that the DON was at home and LPN #11 was the supervisor. LPN #18 said LPN #11 told her to pass medications using the prepackaged medications that had the residents' name, medication name, dosage, and the time it was to be given. LPN #18 said she always checked those things against the MAR as well. LPN #18 said she asked LPN #11 where were the paper MARs and LPN #11 said she did not know. LPN #18 said each floor should have had a book with monthly paper MARs and she thought there should be a policy about that. LPN #18 said there should be something in place for giving medications when there was a power outage or computers go down or anything like that. On 03/22/2025 at 6:26 PM an interview was conducted with RN #17, Unit Manager for the Third Floor. RN #17 said that in preparation for the storm the ADM informed staff that everyone needed to be prepared to come to work if it was safe. RN #17 said when she left around 2 PM she thought the internet was still up. RN #17 said no one informed her that the residents did not get their medications because the internet was down. RN #17 said she did not know how nurses passed medications after the internet went down because she was not there and she did not know who the Supervisor was on those days. RN #17 said staff should have gotten the paper MAR and passed medications from it, and then once the internet was back up the staff should have transferred the information onto the eMAR (Electronic Medication Administration Record). RN #17 had no idea why that was this not implemented when there was an internet outage on 01/21/2025 and 01/22/2025. RN #17 said the Unit Manager or anybody in Administration can place the printed MARs in the binders on each floor. RN #17 said she did not know if the printed MARs were on the Second Floor at the time of the storm, and said they should have been on the Third Floor. On 03/21/2025 at 10:54 AM, an interview was conducted with the DON. The DON said the facility's computer system was run by the internet. The DON said the facility's policy indicated that staff should initiate downtime procedures when the outage is more than 30 minutes. The DON said paper documentation should occur during downtime and this would include the MAR as well. The DON said pre-printed downtime forms should be kept at the nurses' station in the binders behind the nurses station. When asked where would there be evidence these forms were used on 01/21/2025 and 01/22/2025 when the internet was down, the DON said the evidence would be on the paper MAR where the nurses signed their initials. The DON said she had not seen any paper MARs from January 2025 with initials that medications had been administered. The DON said all nurses should have had knowledge of the downtime procedure before 01/21/2025. On 03/22/2025 at 9:42 AM during a follow-up interview with the DON she said she should have been notified when residents did not receive their medications on 01/21/2025 and 01/22/2025. The DON said she would have asked them where was the paper MARs. The DON said anybody, like DON, ADON, unit managers could place the MARs in the book/binders. On 03/23/25 at 4:42 PM a follow-up interview was conducted with the DON. The DON was asked about a previous interview when she stated the ADON, the unit manager or the supervisor could print and place the printed MAR in the binders on the floors, and who would be responsible for verifying the MARs had been printed and placed in the binders. The DON said, no one in particular, it was just a team effort. On 03/21/2025 at 10:23 AM an interview was conducted with the ADM. The ADM said he first became aware during the survey that residents' medications had not been administered during the internet downtime on 01/21/2025 and 01/22/2025. ***************************************************** On 03/26/2025, the facility submitted an acceptable removal plan, which documented: ****************************************************** On January 21st, 2025 in the afternoon, we encountered a major snow storm and our modem was not functioning. Due to the impact of the storm, we were unable to get a technician into the facility to restore the internet until January 22nd, 2025 at approximately 6:00 pm. Unfortunately, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of significant medications when licensed nursing staff failed to administer medications including insulin and other significant medications. Deficiencies The facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from neglect when systems were not in place to ensure continuity of care and operations when the facility experienced a forecasted winter storm which caused internet outage preventing access to EHR system on 01/21/2025 and 01/22/2025. The facility failed to ensure pre-printed paper documentation forms such as physician orders and MARs were available and accessible for the Licensed Nursing Staff to utilize for resident care, treatment, and medication administration prior to the internet outage. This affected all residents in the facility. The nurses and nurse supervisor on duty during that time failed to ensure residents received medications and treatments as ordered by physician. Residents residing on the second floor and third floor did not receive their medications and treatments on 01/21/2025 and 01/22/2025 as ordered. The staff further failed to notify management staff or the residents' physician of their inability to safely administer medication which contributed to medications and other resident care not being performed for greater than 24 hours. All the residents had the potential to be affected by this deficient practice. 1) Process: To ensure that in the event of a power/internet outage the most updated Medical Record Administration (MAR) will be available for nurses that provide care to the residents: The medication administration Record (MAR) will be printed monthly by the Director of Nursing Assistant Director of Nursing or Unit Manager, by the 1st of each month. The paper MAR will be updated at the time the order is received or confirmed for all current resident and new admits by the RN/LPN who receives the order or confirms the new order for any medication changes including all new orders for new admits. The updated MAR will be located by the nursing stations. All, 100% of LPNs and RNs were in-serviced and completed on March 26th, 2025. Inservice was to ensure nurses know where the paper MAR is located and to update it as soon as a new admission or whenever the physician changes an order in the MAR. 2) In services On 3/20/2025 - 03/26/2025 the Director of Nursing and Assistant Director of Nursing began to educate all nurses, all physical therapy staff and administrative staff (receptionist, Admissions Coordinator, Staffing Coordinator and Human Resources) and provided the education with 1:1 in-service to LPN #14, RN #15, LPN #11, RN #20, and RN #16. The in-services included: a) the policy titled Policy on Computer or Internet Downtime and EHR, b) the standard of practice to: i) administer medication, ii) monitor blood glucose, iii) the implementation of the prescribing physicians' orders iv) the importance of documenting medication administration at the time of administration. c) Inservice included calling the physician as well as notify the Director of Nursing or Designee if staff including nurses are unable to carry out a physician's order. d) Inservice included how it led to neglect and the facility's Abuse Policy titled Abuse Policy. The in-service was completed on March 26th, 2025 for 21 of 21 nurses, 9/9 PT staff, 16/16 of administrative staff. On 3/26/2025, 21 of 21 of the nursing staff were all educated by the Director of Nursing or Assistant Director of Nursing and 1:1 in-service to LPN #14, RN #15, LPN #11, RN #20, and RN #16. The in-service included that a printed MAR will be ready for the 1st of each month. A copy of the paper MAR will be kept at each nurses' station for use during downtime. Education included that RNs and LPNs who receives an order or confirms a new order for any medication changes including all new orders for new admits will update the paper medication administration records at the time the order is received or confirmed for all current resident and new admits. The Administrator educated the Director of Nursing and the Assistant Director of Nursing on 03/26/2025 that both of them are responsible to print the paper MAR to be ready for the 1st of each month and will be placed by each of the nurse's station. A monthly MAR print out schedule was created for clarity. The education included that the DON and the ADON will confirm that an accurate MAR for all residents is printed and available for use in the event of a forecasted severe storm such as tropical depression, tropical storm, hurricane, or winter snow storm or other reason to expect downtime. A mock drill was conducted on 3/21/25 for the nursing personnel on shift. 2) Assessment Due to the failure of functionality of the router which caused the internet outage in the facility, the facility replaced the router on January 30th, 2025 through its internet provider. On 3/26/25 The entire Medical Record Administration was reprinted in the event of outage and nurses were all educated that any medication changes or new admissions will need to be updated in the paper medical administration records. All residents that had the potential of being affected by this deficient practice from January 21st 2025 to January 22nd 2025. A report was generated from the electronic medical records to see which residents could have been affected during 1/21/25 - 1/22/25. There was a total of 56 of 56 residents were assessed by the medical director and completed on March 26th, 2025. No adverse effects were identified by the physician due to this deficient practice and no recommendations were made. 2) Quality Assurance An ad-hoc Quality Assurance meeting which included the entire IDT team ( Director of Nursing, Administrator, Rehab Director, Business Office Manager, Social Worker Director, Governing Body, Medical Director, Business Office Manager, Assistant Director of Nursing, Staffing Coordinator, Unit Manager, Dietary Director, Admissions Director) was conducted on March 25, 2025 in response to F600, F658, F580, and F760 to discuss the deficient practice and plan of correction. The nurses that were responsible were immediately educated about the in-proper practice that led to F600, F658, F580, and F760 and on the Policy on Computer or Internet Downtime and EHR access. The QA team discussed the needed in services/education for LPN #14, RN #15, LPN #11, RN #20, and RN #16. This plan was completed on March 26th, 2025. ******************************************************* After review of the information provided in the facility's Removal Plan, in-service/education records, as well as staff interviews, and observations, the survey team determined the facility implemented the immediate corrective actions as of 03/26/2025. ******************************************************** 2.) Cross reference F609, F610, F745, F867, and F943. On 01/30/2025 at 3:04 PM, the State Agency (SA) received an Online Incident Report (FRI) from the facility alleging RI #15 was verbally abused by CNA #10 after RI #15 reported to Licensed Physical Therapy Assistant (LPTA) #7 that a CNA had been mean to him/her (RI #15) and called him/her (RI #15) a Stupid Motherfucker. The FRI documented the LPTA became aware of the incident at 10:50 AM and the ADM was made aware of the incident at 11:20 AM, more than three hours before the SA was informed. The FRI report further documented the CNA had been rough with RI #15's legs, RI #15 was not hurt, but was scared of that CNA. The FRI documented actions taken included suspending CNA #10 pending the investigation, calling the mental health nurse to review, and initiating abuse and customer service in-services. The FRI also included that RI #15 was no longer scared since the CNA was gone. Further review of the facility's Abuse Policy, revealed the following: Our residents have the right to be free from abuse . To help with recognition of incidents of abuse, the following definitions of abuse are provided: 1. Abuse is defined as the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish. 2. Verbal abuse is defined as any use of oral, written or gestured language that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms to residents . within their hearing distance, to describe residents, regardless of their age, ability to comprehend, or disability. RI #15 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses to include: Cellulitis of Left and Right Lower Limb, Need for Assistance with Personal Care, Abnormalities of Gait and Mobility, Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following Cerebral Infarction. RI #15's Significant Change in Status Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/24/2024 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 of 15 which indicated moderately impaired cognition. The facility investigative file contained a summary of the incident involving RI #15 and CNA #10, dated 02/06/2025, signed by the Administrator (ADM) that documented: . (RI #15) alleged that . (CNA #10), cursed (him/her) out and was rough with (his/her) legs . After discussing the allegation . we suspended the C.N.A. pending investigation. Based on the statements and interviews with staff . we have concluded (CNA #10) did curse (RI #15) . going to substantiate the allegation of verbal abuse in this instance. We have initiated abuse in-services for all staff. We are going to terminate the C.N.A. The facility investigative file contained a form titled DIVERSICARE PERSONNEL CHANGE/TERMINATION FORM dated 02/07/2025 for CNA #10 with a reason for termination of abuse. CNA #10's facility time sheet indicated CNA #10 had not worked at the facility since she was clocked out at 12:48 PM on 01/30/2025. On 03/18/2025 at 10:25 AM, an interview was conducted with RI #15. RI #15 told the surveyor CNA #10 came into his/her room on 01/30/2025 to get him/her dressed told him/her to get up and stand up you stupid mother fucker, get up you are going to stand today. RI #15 said, he/she fell back in the bed and CNA #10 called him/her a stupid mother fucker again. RI #15 said, he/she did not care for the CNA to be in his/her room. RI #15 said, CNA #10 told him/her during the incident that she had a bad day the day before. During a follow up interview on 03/22/2025 at 12:24 PM, the surveyor asked RI #15 how it made him/her feel when CNA #10 called him/her a stupid motherfucker. RI #15 stated, stunned and shocked. Contained within the facility's investigative file was a handwritten statement signed by CNA #10 dated 01/30/2025, which documented she was tired and frustrated at the time RI #15 was verbally abused, as follows: I (CNA #10's name) went to (RI #15's) room to change (him/her) to get (him/her) up for activities . I said a few words like I was tired from . doing a double on the previous shift from the day before and I wasn't directly saying it to (RI#15) just whisper it under my breath due to the frustration . Unsuccessful attempts were made to contact CNA #10 during the survey. Contained within the facility's investigative file was a handwritten statement given by the LPTA dated 01/30/2025 at 10:50 AM, which documented the following: Entered (RI #15's room number) and asked (RI #15) how (he/she) was feeling today. (He/She) responded, I'm being abused. That lady called me a 'stupid mother fucker.' When asked who called (him/her) that, (he/she) stated that it was a CNA. On 03/19/2025 at 3:49 PM, in an interview with the LPTA she stated, on 01/30/2025 RI #15 told her that a CNA called him/her a mother fucker. The LPTA stated, RI #15 appeared to be mad. The LPTA stated, she reported to her supervisor the Therapy Director (TD) and the ADM. When asked what type of abuse this would be considered, she stated it would be verbal and emotional. During an interview on 03/19/2025 at 3:31 PM with the TD she stated, she was notified of the allegation on 01/30/2025 by the LPTA who stated RI #15 told her that a CNA used aggressive language toward him/her. The TD stated she had the LPTA to write out a statement and notified the ADM. When asked what type of abuse this would be considered the TD stated verbal. Contained within the facility's investigative file was a handwritten statement given by CNA #8 dated 12/30/25, which documented the following: Today (RI #15) said to me after I walked into (his/her) room because (CNA #10) stormed out heated that she was getting a attitude with (him/her) and calling (him/her) names because (he/she) didn't stand up . An interview was conducted on 03/19/2025 at 4:16 PM, with CNA #8. CNA #8 stated that she went into RI #15's room and he/she told her that CNA #10 called him/her a stupid mother fucker. Contained within the facility's investigative file was a written statement given by CNA #9 dated 01/30/2025, which documented the following: I walked (room number of RI #15) to help (him/her) get up and (he/she) said (CNA #10) left (him/her) and was mean to (him/her) and called (him/her) a dumb mother fucker. A telephone interview was conducted on 03/19/2025 at 04:32 PM, with CNA #9. CNA #9 stated that on 01/30/2025 that she and CNA #8 were in RI #15's room providing personal care and that he/she told her a CNA was rude, nasty and called him/her a mother fucker. CNA #9 stated this was verbal abuse. Contained within the facility's investigative file was a handwritten statement signed by the ADM dated 01/30/2025 when he interviewed RI #15, which documented the following: . I asked (RI #15) who was treating (him/her) bad and (he/she) replied (CNA #10). I asked what was said and (CNA #10) called me a stupid motherfucker . I asked (him/her) if (he/she) was scared (he/she) stated yes of her (CNA #10) . During an interview on 03/20/2025 at 11:32 AM the ADM stated he became aware of the allegation of abuse involving RI #15 on 01/30/2025 at about 11:20 AM by the TD. The ADM stated, the TD was told by the LPTA that CNA #10 called RI #15 a stupid mother fucker. The ADM stated, he initiated an investigation. The ADM stated RI #15 told him that CNA #10 called him/her a stupid mother fucker. The ADM said this allegation was substantiated and it would be considered verbal abuse.
CRITICAL (L) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Deficiency F0658 (Tag F0658)

Someone could have died · This affected most or all residents

⚠️ Facility-wide issue

Based on interviews, record review, review of facility policies titled Administering Medications, and Policy on Computer or Internet Downtime and EHR (Electronic Health Record) Access, the facility fa...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interviews, record review, review of facility policies titled Administering Medications, and Policy on Computer or Internet Downtime and EHR (Electronic Health Record) Access, the facility failed to ensure Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #14, Registered Nurse (RN) #15, RN #16, RN #20, and LPN #18 followed standards of practice and facility's policies. Specifically, LPN #14 and RN #15 failed to follow standards of practice to administer medications and perform Capillary Blood Glucose (CBG) monitoring as ordered by the physician on 01/21/2025 during the 2 PM to 10 PM shift on the Second Floor. The nurses did not notify the residents' physician, DON, or the Administrator that medications were not being administered and CBG checks were not being performed. It was determined the facility's non-compliance with one or more requirements of participation had caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment, or death. The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was cited in reference to 483.21 Comprehensive Resident Centered Care Plan. On 03/25/2025 at 4:15 PM, the Administrator (ADM), the DON, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), and Executive Director of Operations were provided a copy of the IJ template and notified of the finding of immediate jeopardy in the area Comprehensive Resident Centered Care Plan at F658-Services Provided Meet Professional Standards. The IJ began on 01/21/2025 and continued until 03/26/2025 when the facility implemented corrective action to remove the immediacy. On 03/27/2025 the immediate jeopardy was removed, F658 was lowered to the lower severity of no actual harm with a potential for more than minimal harm that was not immediate jeopardy, to allow the facility time to monitor and/or revise their corrective actions as necessary to achieve substantial compliance. In addition, RN #20 and RN #16 failed to follow standards of practice when they administered medications using the pre-packaged medications without following the rights of medication administration to verify the physician's order. RN #20 and RN #16 did not document that they administered the residents' medications at the time of administration or when the EHR system was restored. Further LPN #18 failed to administer and document medication administration per standards of practice and facility's policy. This affected residents on the Second and Third Floors who were received medications at the facility, 48 of 52 residents who resided at the facility on 01/21/2025 and 01/22/2025. This deficiency was cited as the result of the investigation of complaint/report number AL00050173. Findings Include: Cross-Reference F580, F600 and F760. Review of an undated facility policy titled, Policy on Computer or Internet Downtime and EHR (Electronic Health Record) Access, revealed the following: Purpose To establish procedures for maintaining continuity of care and operations when the facility experiences a computer or internet outage that prevents access to the Electronic Health Record (EHR) system . Procedures 1. Notification Process . If the outage is expected to last more the 30 minutes, staff will initiate downtime procedures. 2. Documentation During Downtime Paper documentation will be used for all resident care activities, including but not limited to: Medication Administration Records (MARs) . 3. Medication Administration Nurses will refer to printed MARs/TARs (Treatment Administration Records) or previously printed backup records if available . 4. Restoring EHR Data Once systems are restored, all paper documentation must be entered into the EHR system as soon as possible . Nursing and administrative staff will verify that all data has been accurately transferred before discounting paper documentation . The facility policy titled, Administering Medications, with a revised date of 04/2019, revealed the following: Policy Statement Medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. Policy Interpretation and Implementation . 4. Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frames . 7. Medications are administered within (1) hour of their prescribed time . 10. The individual administering the medication check the label THREE (3) times to verify the right resident, right medication, right dosage, right time and right method (route) of administration before giving the medication. 22. The individual administering the medication initials the resident's MAR on the appropriate line after giving each medication . 23. As required or indicated for a medication, the individual administering the medication records in the resident's medical record: a. The date and time the medication was administered; b. The dosage; c. The route of administration . g. The signature and title of the person administering the drug . A review of the facility's Midnight Census Report documented a facility census of 52 residents on 01/21/2025 with 27 residents on the Second Floor and 25 residents on the Third Floor. Second Floor The DAILY ASSIGNMENT SHEET indicated that LPN #14 was assigned the Second Floor back hall medication cart 01/21/2025 on the 2 PM to 10 PM shift. On 03/22/2025 at 1:43 PM, a telephone interview was conducted with LPN #14, who said on 01/21/2025 she could not pass medications because the internet was down, and she did not have the MARs to see what needed to be done. LPN #14 said she did not check residents CBG either during that time. LPN #14's assigned residents' MARs and physician orders were reviewed. The review revealed that 12 residents including RI #4, 35, 12, 38, 7, 21, 2, 52, 158, 6, 308, and 30 had scheduled medications that were not administered during the 01/21/2025 2 PM to 10 PM shift. A total of 85 doses of residents' medications were not administered, and 2 residents missed CBG checks as ordered during her shift on 01/21/2025. Medications not administered included, but not limited to, Metformin, Symbiotic Inhalation, Novolin Insulin, and Memantine Tablet. The DAILY ASSIGNMENT SHEET indicated that RN #15 was assigned the Second Floor front hall medication cart 01/21/2025 on the 2 PM to 10 PM shift. On 03/22/2025 at 2:40 PM during an interview with RN #15, she indicated she worked the Second Floor on 01/21/2025 from 6 AM to 10 PM. RN #15 said she could not administer medications during the 2 PM to 10 PM shift as ordered because the computers were not working. RN #15 said she reported that she was unable to administer medications to the Supervisor at the facility, LPN #11. RN #15 said she was unable to administer any medications except controlled pain medications upon resident's request. RN #15 said she did not check anyone's CBG because the computer was down. RN #15's assigned resident MARs and physician orders were reviewed. The review revealed 13 residents including RI #3, 56, 31, 27, 32, 17, 51, 20, 34, 46, 24, 159, and 15 had scheduled medications that were not administered during the 01/21/2025 2 PM to 10 PM shift. A total of 77 doses of residents' medications were not administered as ordered, and 2 residents missed CBG checks during RN #15's shift on 01/21/2025. Medications not administered included, but not limited to, Tamiflu Capsule, Carvedilol, Valproic Acid, Remeron, Hydralazine, Metoprolol Tartrate, Insulin Lispro, and Dilantin Capsule. On 03/19/2025 at 3:53 PM, during a telephone with LPN #11, she said on 01/21/2025 the computer system went down and there were new nurses working. LPN #11 continued to say the facility did not print MARs for the new nurses to use to administer residents' medications. LPN #11 said the physician orders were not being followed if the residents do not get their medications. The DAILY ASSIGNMENT SHEET indicated that RN #20 was assigned both medication carts on the Second Floor on 01/22/2025 on the 6 AM to 2 PM shift. On 03/22/2025 at 5:14 PM an interview was conducted with RN #20. Regarding medication administration on 01/22/2025, RN #20 said she administered medications using the prepacked medications that were labeled with resident's name, medication, dose, and time it was due. RN #20 said residents who had orders for over-the-counter (OTC) or stock medication would not have received those medications without the printed MARs because those medications were not prepackaged. RN #20 said she was able to check residents' CBG because she had a report sheet. RN #20 said she was unable to document anything in the residents' medical records. The DAILY ASSIGNMENT SHEET indicated that RN #16 was assigned to both medication carts on the Second Floor on 01/22/2025 on the 2 PM to 10 PM shift and 10 PM to 6 AM shift. On 03/22/2025 at 5:47 PM an interview was conducted with RN #16 who worked on the Third Floor on 01/21/2025 and Second Floor on 01/22/2025. RN #16 said she also used the prepackaged medications to administer medications during her shifts and was unable to document medication administration because she did not have paper MARs. RN #16 said if anyone required CBG monitoring such as a sliding scale, she could not have administered it, because the facility did not have the paper MAR or eMAR. RN #16 said she could administer residents with scheduled doses of insulin because she knew which residents were routine. Residents' who resided on the Second Floor MARs and physician's orders were reviewed. The reviews revealed 4 residents with orders for CBG monitoring and 25 residents had medications that were not documented as administered on 01/22/2025. A total 410 doses of residents' medication were not documented as administered on 01/22/2025 between all shifts. Medications not administered included, but not limited to, sliding scale insulin and OTC medications such as Aspirin, Multivitamins, Colace, and Miralax. Third Floor The DAILY ASSIGNMENT SHEET indicated that RN #16 was assigned to administer medications on the Third Floor on 01/21/2025 on the 2 PM to 10 PM shift and 10 PM to 6 AM shift. RN #16's assigned residents' MARs and physician's orders were reviewed and revealed that 21 residents including RI #36, 37, 45, 25, 39, 29, 44, 161, 48, 47, 23, 22, 19, 43, 162, 50, 33, 9, 42, 14, and 40 had scheduled medications that had not been documented as administered on 01/22/2025 during the 2 PM to 10 PM shift. A total of 68 doses of residents' medications were not documented as administered and 3 residents CBG checks were not documented as completed during RN #16's shift on 01/21/2025. Medications not documented as administered included Eliquis, Insulin Detemir, Metoprolol Succinate Extended Release, Multivitamin tablets, Docusate Sodium, and Miralax. Further review of Third Floor residents MARs and physician's orders revealed 5 residents including RI #36, 19, 2, 59, and 33 had scheduled medications that were not documented as administered on 01/22/2025 at 6:00 AM. A total of a total of 36 doses of residents' medications were not documented as administered on 01/22/2025 at 6:00 AM. Medications that were not documented as administered included, but not limited to, Amlodipine Besylate, Cymbalta, Ferrous Sulfate, Tamsulosine, and Telmisartan. The DAILY ASSIGNMENT SHEET indicated that LPN #18 was assigned to administer medications on the Third Floor on 01/22/2025 on the 6 AM to 2 PM shift and 2 PM to 10 PM shift. On 03/20/2025 at 4:49 PM, an interview was conducted with LPN #18 who said she used her cellular hotspot to connect to the internet so she could administer residents' medications and document on their eMAR (Electronic Medication Administration Record). LPN #18 said the evidence that the resident had received their medications as ordered by the physician would be the initials on eMAR. LPN #18 said the physician orders were not followed if the residents did not receive their medications. When asked why it would be important for residents to receive their medications as ordered by the physician, LPN #18 said because residents need to get their medications. LPN #18 said if residents do not get their seizure medications, they might have a seizure, if they did not get their blood pressure medication their blood pressure might go up or down. LPN #18's assigned residents' MARs and physician's orders were reviewed. The review revealed 10 residents including RI #25, 47, 22, 19, 50, 33, 9, 42, 14, and 40 had medications that were not documented as administered and 1 resident had CBG ordered, but not documented on 01/22/2025 during LPN #18's shift. Medications not documented as administered included, but not limited to, Insulin Detemir, Docusate Sodium, Lisinopril, Memantine, and Metoprolol Succinate Oral Capsule Extended Release (ER). On 03/22/2025 at 9:42 AM the DON was interviewed. The DON said she was not notified that residents' medications were not administered on 01/21/2025. The DON said she had not been able to locate the January 2025 paper MARS. The DON said the possibility of things that could have occurred when residents did not receive their medications as ordered by the physician depended on the medication. The DON said if it was a blood pressure (BP) medication not given, the BP may go up or down, if insulin was not administered hypo- or hyperglycemia may occur. On 03/25/2025 at 12:00 PM a follow-up interview was conducted with the DON who was asked, when should a nurse not administer medication as ordered and not notify the facility's DON or the person in charge that they were not able to administer medications. The DON responded never. The DON was asked, when should a nurse administer the pre-packaged medications and not document medications as administered. The DON responded, never. On 03/21/2025 at 10:23 AM an interview was conducted with the Administrator (ADM) who said he was notified the internet was not working, but not notified that staff were not administering medications as ordered. The ADM said he instructed staff to use the paper MARs. The ADM said he was not aware residents' medications had not been administered as ordered until the current survey. ********************************************************* On 03/26/2025, the facility submitted an acceptable removal plan, which documented: ********************************************************** 1) Process: To ensure that in the event of a power/internet outage the most updated Medical Record Administration (MAR) will be available for nurses that provide care to the residents: The medication administration Record (MAR) will be printed monthly by the Director of Nursing Assistant Director of Nursing or Unit Manager, by the 1st of each month. The paper MAR will be updated at the time the order is received or confirmed for all current resident and new admits by the RN/LPN who receives the order or confirms the new order for any medication changes including all new orders for new admits. The updated MAR will be located by the nursing stations. All, 100% of LPNs and RNs were in-serviced and completed on March 26th, 2025. Inservice was to ensure nurses know where the paper MAR is located and to update it as soon as a new admission or whenever the physician changes an order in the MAR. 2) In services On 3/20/2025 - 03/26/2025 the Director of Nursing and Assistant Director of Nursing began to educate all nurses, all physical therapy staff and administrative staff (receptionist, Admissions Coordinator, Staffing Coordinator and Human Resources) and provided the education with 1:1 in-service to LPN #14, RN #15, LPN #11, RN #20, and RN #16. The in-services included: a) the policy titled Policy on Computer or Internet Downtime and EHR, b) the standard of practice to: i) administer medication, ii) monitor blood glucose, iii) the implementation of the prescribing physicians' orders iv) the importance of documenting medication administration at the time of administration. c) Inservice included calling the physician as well as notify the Director of Nursing or Designee if staff including nurses are unable to carry out a physician's order. d) Inservice included how it led to neglect and the facility's Abuse Policy titled Abuse Policy. The in-service was completed on March 26th, 2025 for 21 of 21 nurses, 9/9 PT staff, 16/16 of administrative staff. On 3/26/2025, 21 of 21 of the nursing staff were all educated by the Director of Nursing or Assistant Director of Nursing and 1:1 in-service to LPN #14, RN #15, LPN #11, RN #20, and RN #16. The in-service included that a printed MAR will be ready for the 1st of each month. A copy of the paper MAR will be kept at each nurses' station for use during downtime. Education included that RNs and LPNs who receives an order or confirms a new order for any medication changes including all new orders for new admits will update the paper medication administration records at the time the order is received or confirmed for all current resident and new admits. The Administrator educated the Director of Nursing and the Assistant Director of Nursing on 03/26/2025 that both of them are responsible to print the paper MAR to be ready for the 1st of each month and will be placed by each of the nurse's station. A monthly MAR print out schedule was created for clarity. The education included that the DON and the ADON will confirm that an accurate MAR for all residents is printed and available for use in the event of a forecasted severe storm such as tropical depression, tropical storm, hurricane, or winter snow storm or other reason to expect downtime. A mock drill was conducted on 3/21/25 for the nursing personnel on shift. 2) Assessment Due to the failure of functionality of the router which caused the internet outage in the facility, the facility replaced the router on January 30th, 2025 through its internet provider. On 3/26/25 The entire Medical Record Administration was reprinted in the event of outage and nurses were all educated that any medication changes or new admissions will need to be updated in the paper medical administration records. All residents that had the potential of being affected by this deficient practice from January 21st 2025 to January 22nd 2025. A report was generated from the electronic medical records to see which residents could have been affected during 1/21/25 - 1/22/25. There was a total of 56 of 56 residents were assessed by the medical director and completed on March 26th, 2025. No adverse effects were identified by the physician due to this deficient practice and no recommendations were made. 2) Quality Assurance An ad-hoc Quality Assurance meeting which included the entire IDT team ( Director of Nursing, Administrator, Rehab Director, Business Office Manager, Social Worker Director, Governing Body, Medical Director, Business Office Manager, Assistant Director of Nursing, Staffing Coordinator, Unit Manager, Dietary Director, Admissions Director) was conducted on March 25, 2025 in response to F600, F658, F580, and F760 to discuss the deficient practice and plan of correction. The nurses that were responsible were immediately educated about the in-proper practice that led to F600, F658, F580, and F760 and on the Policy on Computer or Internet Downtime and EHR access. The QA team discussed the needed in services/education for LPN #14, RN #15, LPN #11, RN #20, and RN #16. This plan was completed on March 26th, 2025. ******************************************************** After review of the information provided in the facility's Removal Plan, in-service/education records, as well as staff interviews, and observations, the survey team determined the facility implemented the immediate corrective actions as of 03/26/2025.
CRITICAL (L) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Deficiency F0760 (Tag F0760)

Someone could have died · This affected most or all residents

⚠️ Facility-wide issue

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, record review, and review of a facility policy titled Administering Medications the facility failed to ensu...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, record review, and review of a facility policy titled Administering Medications the facility failed to ensure residents were free of significant medication errors when licensed nursing staff failed to administer medications including insulin and other significant medications. Specifically, on 01/21/2025 during a forecasted snowstorm the facility lost internet connection sometime after lunch which resulted in inability to access residents Electronic Health Record (EHR)/Electronic Medication Administration Record (eMAR) until the evening of 01/22/2025. Resident Identifier (RI) #12, RI #15, RI #30, and RI #308 were not administered significant medications from 01/21/2025 at 5:00 PM until 01/22/2025 at 9:00 PM. It was determined the facility's non-compliance with one or more requirements of participation had caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment, or death. The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was cited in reference to 483.45 Pharmacy Services. On 03/25/2025 at 4:15 PM, the Administrator (ADM), the DON, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), and Executive Director of Operations were provided a copy of the IJ template and notified of the finding of immediate jeopardy substandard quality of care in the area of Pharmacy Services at F 760-Residents are Free of Significant Med Errors. The IJ began on 01/21/2025 and continued until 03/26/2025 when the facility implemented corrective action to remove the immediacy. On 03/27/2025 the immediate jeopardy was removed, F760 was lowered to the lower severity of no actual harm with a potential for more than minimal harm that was not immediate jeopardy, to allow the facility time to monitor and/or revise their corrective actions as necessary to achieve substantial compliance. This deficient practice affected RI #12, 15, 30 and 308, four of four residents reviewed for significant medication errors. This deficiency was cited as the result of the investigation of complaint/report number AL00050173. Findings Include: Cross-Reference F580, F600, and F658. Review of the facility's policy titled, Administering Medications, with a revised date of 04/2019, revealed the following: Policy Statement Medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. Policy Interpretation and Implementation . 4. Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frame . 7. Medications are administered within one (1) hour of their prescribed time . 22. The individual administering the medication initials the resident's MAR . after giving each medication . RI #12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnosis to include Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Diabetic Chronic Kidney Disease and Hyperglycemia. RI #12 resided on the Third Flood of the facility. RI #12's January 2025 Order Summary Report (Physicians Orders) revealed RI #12 had orders for: sliding scale Insulin Aspart Injection Solution subcutaneous four times a for hyperglycemia related to Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Diabetic Chronic Kidney Disease; and 6 units of Novolin N FlexPen Subcutaneous Suspension Pen-Injection subcutaneously at bedtime related to Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Other Specific Complication. A review of RI #12's January 2025 eMAR revealed RI #12's Insulin Aspart injection per sliding scale was not administered on 01/21/2025 at 5:00 PM, 01/21/2025 at 9:00 PM, 01/22/2025 at 7:30 AM, 01/22/2025 at 11:30 AM, 01/22/2025 at 5:00 PM, and 01/22/2025 at 9:00 PM. The eMAR further revealed Novolin N 6 units was not administered to RI #12 on 01/21/2025 at 9:00 PM and 01/22/2025 at 9:00 PM. On 03/22/2025 at 5:47 PM an interview was conducted with RN #16. During the interview RN #16 said she worked on the Third Floor on the 2 PM to 10 PM and 10 PM to 6 AM shift on 01/21/2025. RN #16 said if anyone required blood glucose monitoring such as a sliding scale, she could not have administered it, because the facility did not have the paper MAR or eMAR while the internet was down. RN #16 said she could administer residents with scheduled doses of insulin because she knew which residents were routine. On 03/20/2025 at 4:49 PM an interview was conducted with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #18 who reported she worked on the Third Floor on the 6 AM to 2 PM and 2 PM to 10 PM shifts on 01/22/2025. She reported when the facility lost internet that she connected to a hotspot and passed medications as ordered. RI #15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Localization-Related (Focal) (Partial) Symptomatic Epilepsy, and Essential (Primary) Hypertension. RI #15 resided on the Second Floor of the facility. RI #15's January 2025 Physicians Orders revealed RI #15 had orders for Carvedilol 25 mg two times a day related to Hypertension, Hydralazine 50 mg two times a day related to Hypertension, Insulin Glargine 30 units subcutaneous in the evening related to Diabetes, Lacosamide 50 mg two times a day related to Seizures, and Insulin Lispro per sliding scale before meals related to Diabetes. A review of RI #15's January 2025 eMAR revealed RI #15's was not administered: Hydralazine 50 milligram (mg) 01/21/2025 at 5:00 PM, 01/22/2025 at 8:00 AM, and 01/22/2025 at 5:00 PM; Lacosamide 50 mg on 01/21/2025 at 5:00 PM, 01/22/2025 at 8:00 AM, and 01/22/2025 at 5:00 PM; Carvedilol 25 mg on 01/21/2025 at 8:00 PM, 01/22/2025 at 8:00, and 01/22/2025 at 8:00 PM; Glargine Insulin 30 units on 01/21/2025 at 5:00 PM and 01/22/2205 at 5:00 PM; and Insulin Lispro sliding scale on 01/21/2025 at 4:00 PM, 01/22/2025 at 7:30 AM, 01/22/2025 at 11:00 AM and 01/22/2025 at 4:00 PM. RI #30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Diabetic Neuropathy, Chronic Diastolic (Congestive) Heart Failure, Essential Hypertension, Atherosclerotic Heart Disease of Native Coronary Artery, and Long Term (Current) Use of Insulin. RI #30 resided on the Second Floor. RI #30's January 2025 Physicians Orders revealed RI #30 had orders for blood glucose monitoring twice a day related to Type 2 Diabetes, Carvedilol 12.5 mg every morning and at bedtime for Beta Blockers, Furosemide 40 mg two times a day for Diuretics, Novolog 8 units before meals related to Type 2 Diabetes, and Rivaroxaban 2.5 mg two times a day for Anticoagulants. A review of RI #30's January 2025 eMAR revealed RI #30 was not administered: Lasix 40 mg 01/21/2025 at 5:00 PM, 01/22/2025 at 8:00 AM, 01/22/2025 at 5:00 PM; Rivaroxaban 2.5 mg 01/21/2025 at 5:00 PM, 01/22/2025 at 8:00 AM, 01/22/2025 at 5:00 PM; Coreg 12.5 mg 01/21/2025 at 8:00 PM, 01/22/2025 at 8:00 AM, 01/22/2025 at 8:00 PM; Novolog 8 units on 01/21/2025 at 4:00 PM, 01/21/2025 at 9:00 PM, 01/22/2025 at 7:30 AM, 01/22/2025 at 11:00 AM, 01/22/2025 at 4:00 PM, and 01/22/2025 at 9:00 PM. RI #30's January 2025 eMAR also indicated his/her blood glucose was not monitored on 01/21/2025 at 5:00 PM, 01/22/2025 at 8:00 AM, or on 01/22/2025 at 5:00 PM. RI #308 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 01/29/2025. RI #308 had diagnoses that included Epilepsy, Unspecified, Conversion Disorder with Seizures or Convulsions and Localization-Related (Focal) (Partial) Symptomatic Epilepsy and Epileptic Syndrome with Complex Partial Seizures. RI #308 resided on the Second Floor. RI #308's January 2025 Physicians Orders revealed RI #308 had orders for Clobazam 10 mg two times a day for Anticonvulsants, Lacosamide 50 mg two times a day for Anticonvulsants, Lamotrigine 100 mg two times a day for Anticonvulsants, Oxcarbazepine 300 mg two times a day for Anticonvulsant, and Topiramate 300 mg two times a day for Anticonvulsant. A review of RI #308's January 2025 eMAR revealed RI #308 was not administered his/her: Clobazam 10 mg on 01/21/2025 at 5:00 PM, 01/22/2025 at 8:00 AM, and 01/22/2025 at 5:00 PM; Lacosamide 50 mg on 01/21/2025 at 5:00 PM, 01/22/2025 at 8:00 AM, and 01/22/2025 at 5:00 PM; Lamotrigine 100 mg on 01/21/2025 at 5:00 PM, 01/22/2025 at 8:00 AM, and 01/22/2025 at 5:00 PM; Oxcarbazepine 300 mg on 01/21/2025 at 5:00 PM, 01/22/2025 at 8:00 AM, and 01/22/2025 at 5:00 PM; Topiramate 300 mg on 01/21/2025 at 5:00 PM, 01/22/2025 at 8:00 AM, and 01/22/2025 at 5:00 PM. On 03/25/2025 at 11:05 AM an interview was conducted with RI #308 who said he/she was scheduled to receive medications for seizures twice a day. RI #308 said there was a few shifts that he/she did not receive any of his/her medications. On 03/21/2025 at 11:58 AM an interview was conducted with Registered Nurse (RN) #15. RN #15 reported she worked a double shift from 6 AM to 10 PM on 01/21/2025 on the Second Floor. RN #15 said something happened during the evening shift on 01/21/2025 and she was unable to pass any medications because she did not have access to residents' eMAR. On 03/22/2025 at 1:43 PM an interview was conducted with LPN #14 who reported she worked a double shift from 6 AM to 10 PM on 01/21/2025 on the Second Floor and was assigned to RI #15's rooms for medication passes. LPN #14 reported that RN #15 was assigned to RI #30 and RI #308's medication passes. LPN #14 said the facility's internet stopped functioning around 2 PM on 01/21/2025. LPN #14 said she was unable to access residents' eMAR. RN #15 said she did not administer medications or monitor resident blood glucose because the internet was down. LPN #14 said she did not know who needed their blood glucose checked off the top of her head, so she did not check. On 03/25/2025 at 1:32 PM, a telephone interview was conducted with the Medical Director (MD) and RI #12, 308, 40 and 15's physician. Regarding RI #12's missed medications the MD said, the likelihood of harm was that resident's blood sugars could go up if a resident did not receive their scheduled insulin and their blood sugars were not monitored as ordered. The MD said other things that could result from a person not receiving their insulin and not having their blood sugars checked as ordered would be short term DKA (Diabetic Ketoacidosis) and being placed on an insulin drip if blood sugars were too high. Regarding RI #308's missed medications, the MD said there was a likelihood of reoccurrence of seizures if a resident did not receive their seizure medications as ordered. Regarding RI #40's missed medications, the MD said a person with a history of diabetes, hypertension and stroke, and congestive heart failure not receiving their scheduled medications as ordered could cause their blood sugars to go up, fluid retention, and reoccurrence of heart failure. Regarding RI #15's missed medications the MD was asked, what was likely to occur if a resident did not receive their insulin, blood pressure, and seizure medications as ordered. The MD said there could be a reoccurrence of seizures, elevated blood pressures, and a person's blood sugars could go up. ******************************************************* On 03/26/2025, the facility submitted an acceptable removal plan, which documented: ****************************************************** 1) Process: To ensure that in the event of a power/internet outage the most updated Medical Record Administration (MAR) will be available for nurses that provide care to the residents: The medication administration Record (MAR) will be printed monthly by the Director of Nursing Assistant Director of Nursing or Unit Manager, by the 1st of each month. The paper MAR will be updated at the time the order is received or confirmed for all current resident and new admits by the RN/LPN who receives the order or confirms the new order for any medication changes including all new orders for new admits. The updated MAR will be located by the nursing stations. All, 100% of LPNs and RNs were in-serviced and completed on March 26th, 2025. Inservice was to ensure nurses know where the paper MAR is located and to update it as soon as a new admission or whenever the physician changes an order in the MAR. 2) In services On 3/20/2025 - 03/26/2025 the Director of Nursing and Assistant Director of Nursing began to educate all nurses, all physical therapy staff and administrative staff (receptionist, Admissions Coordinator, Staffing Coordinator and Human Resources) and provided the education with 1:1 in-service to LPN #14, RN #15, LPN #11, RN #20, and RN #16. The in-services included: a) the policy titled Policy on Computer or Internet Downtime and EHR, b) the standard of practice to: i) administer medication, ii) monitor blood glucose, iii) the implementation of the prescribing physicians' orders iv) the importance of documenting medication administration at the time of administration. c) Inservice included calling the physician as well as notify the Director of Nursing or Designee if staff including nurses are unable to carry out a physician's order. d) Inservice included how it led to neglect and the facility's Abuse Policy titled Abuse Policy. The in-service was completed on March 26th, 2025 for 21 of 21 nurses, 9/9 PT staff, 16/16 of administrative staff. On 3/26/2025, 21 of 21 of the nursing staff were all educated by the Director of Nursing or Assistant Director of Nursing and 1:1 in-service to LPN #14, RN #15, LPN #11, RN #20, and RN #16. The in-service included that a printed MAR will be ready for the 1st of each month. A copy of the paper MAR will be kept at each nurses' station for use during downtime. Education included that RNs and LPNs who receives an order or confirms a new order for any medication changes including all new orders for new admits will update the paper medication administration records at the time the order is received or confirmed for all current resident and new admits. The Administrator educated the Director of Nursing and the Assistant Director of Nursing on 03/26/2025 that both of them are responsible to print the paper MAR to be ready for the 1st of each month and will be placed by each of the nurse's station. A monthly MAR print out schedule was created for clarity. The education included that the DON and the ADON will confirm that an accurate MAR for all residents is printed and available for use in the event of a forecasted severe storm such as tropical depression, tropical storm, hurricane, or winter snow storm or other reason to expect downtime. A mock drill was conducted on 3/21/25 for the nursing personnel on shift. 2) Assessment Due to the failure of functionality of the router which caused the internet outage in the facility, the facility replaced the router on January 30th, 2025 through its internet provider. On 3/26/25 The entire Medical Record Administration was reprinted in the event of outage and nurses were all educated that any medication changes or new admissions will need to be updated in the paper medical administration records. All residents that had the potential of being affected by this deficient practice from January 21st 2025 to January 22nd 2025. A report was generated from the electronic medical records to see which residents could have been affected during 1/21/25 - 1/22/25. There was a total of 56 of 56 residents were assessed by the medical director and completed on March 26th, 2025. No adverse effects were identified by the physician due to this deficient practice and no recommendations were made. 2) Quality Assurance An ad-hoc Quality Assurance meeting which included the entire IDT team ( Director of Nursing, Administrator, Rehab Director, Business Office Manager, Social Worker Director, Governing Body, Medical Director, Business Office Manager, Assistant Director of Nursing, Staffing Coordinator, Unit Manager, Dietary Director, Admissions Director) was conducted on March 25, 2025 in response to F600, F658, F580, and F760 to discuss the deficient practice and plan of correction. The nurses that were responsible were immediately educated about the in-proper practice that led to F600, F658, F580, and F760 and on the Policy on Computer or Internet Downtime and EHR access. The QA team discussed the needed in services/education for LPN #14, RN #15, LPN #11, RN #20, and RN #16. This plan was completed on March 26th, 2025. ******************************************************** After review of the information provided in the facility's Removal Plan, in-service/education records, as well as staff interviews, and observations, the survey team determined the facility implemented the immediate corrective actions as of 03/26/2025.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0558 (Tag F0558)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interview, record review and review of a facility policy titled, Answering the Call Light, the facility f...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interview, record review and review of a facility policy titled, Answering the Call Light, the facility failed to ensure Resident Identifier (RI) #43's call light was in reach on 03/18/2025 and 03/19/2025 for RI #43 to be able to summon staff as needed. This deficient practice affected RI #43, one of 18 sampled residents. Findings Include: Review of a facility policy titled, Answering the Call Light, with a revised date of 10/2010, revealed the following: . The purpose of this procedure is to respond to the resident's request and needs. General Guidelines . 5. When the resident is in bed . be sure the call light is within easy reach of the resident . RI #43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had a diagnosis of Vascular Dementia. RI #43's care plan with a need of potential for alteration in communication and impaired thought process related to vascular dementia, had an approach dated 02/18/2024, guiding staff to ensure/provide a safe environment with the call light in reach. On 03/18/2025 at 10:46 AM, the surveyor observed RI #43's call light on the floor behind the head of RI #43's bed, not accessible to RI #43 at this time. On 03/18/2025 at 12:16 PM, RI #43's call light remained on the floor behind the head of the bed out of RI #43's reach. On 03/19/2025 at 8:35 AM, RI #43's call light remained on the floor out of reach of RI #43. On 03/19/2025 at 2:40 PM, RI #43's call light remained on the floor behind the head of the bed out of RI #43's reach. On 03/19/2025 at 2:42 PM, the surveyor conducted an interview with the Registered Nurse (RN) Unit Manager/RN #17. RN #17 said RI #43 was able to use his/her call light. When asked how should RI #43's call light be positioned, RN #17 said on the bed where RI #43 could reach it. RN #17 said RI #43's call light was behind the bed on the floor and RI #43 could not reach it from that position. When asked why it would be important to ensure RI #43's call light was in easy reach, RN #17 said so if RI #43 needed anything like the aide or the nurse RI #43 could call and staff could get to RI #43 in a timely manner. RN #17 said it would be the responsibility of all staff to ensure RI #43's call light was in easy reach.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0583 (Tag F0583)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, record review, and review of a facility policy titled, Confidentiality of Information and Personal Privacy,...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, record review, and review of a facility policy titled, Confidentiality of Information and Personal Privacy, the facility failed to ensure personal privacy and confidentiality were maintained for Resident Identifier (RI) #52. Specifically, on 01/29/2025, licensed staff provided medication, belonging to RI #52 and labeled with RI #52's information, to RI #308 upon discharge home from the facility. This deficient practice affected RI #52, one of 18 sampled residents. This deficient was cited as a result of the investigation or complaint/report number AL00050173. Findings Include: Review of a facility policy titled, Confidentiality of Information and Personal Privacy, with a revised date of 10/2017, revealed the following: Policy Statement Our facility will protect and safeguard resident confidentiality and personal privacy. Policy Interpretation and Implementation . 2. The facility will strive to protect the resident's privacy regarding his or her: . b. medical treatment . RI #308 was admitted to the facility 01/09/2025 and discharged on 01/29/2025. RI #52 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. RI #52's Order Summary Report (Physician Orders) revealed RI #52 was prescribed Cyclobenzaprine (Flexeril) HCL (Hydrochloric Acid) Oral Tablet 5 MG (milligrams) by mouth three times a day for muscle spasms for 14 days. This order had a start date of 01/16/2025. On 03/19/2025 at 9:54 AM, a telephone interview was conducted with the RI #308's family member (FM). When asked about RI #308 being discharged home with someone's else medications, the FM said, her concern was someone not getting their medications because they went home with RI #308. The surveyor asked the complainant whose medications were sent home with RI #308. The complainant said, RI #52's name was the resident's name and the name of the medication in her possession was Cyclobenzaprine. On 03/19/2025 at 8:45 PM, a telephone interview was conducted with Registered Nurse (RN) #13, the nurse who discharged RI #308 home. When asked how did RI #52's Flexeril medication get sent home with RI #308, RN #13 said, she had RI #308's medications put to the side and had RI #308's things ready to go home. RN #13 said when the ambulance service came to pick up RI #308, she must have unintentionally placed RI #52's medication card into RI #308's bag of medications. On 03/20/2025 at 11:00 AM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). When asked should a resident be sent home with another resident's medications, the DON said never. The DON said it would also be a privacy concern when someone, besides nursing staff, had information concerning the medications a resident was receiving. On 03/26/2025 at 3:42 PM, a telephone interview was conducted with the Pharmacist. When asked what type of concern it would be if a resident's medications were sent home with another resident being discharged from the facility, the Pharmacist said, that would be privacy for the resident whose medications were sent home. When asked what guidance she would give to the facility if a resident's medications were accidentally sent home with another resident, the Pharmacist said, she would have informed the facility to try and retrieve the medicine from the family and bring it back to the facility.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interview, record review, review of a facility policy titled Abuse Policy, and review of a Facility Reported Incident (FRI), the facility failed to report to the State Agency an allegation of...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interview, record review, review of a facility policy titled Abuse Policy, and review of a Facility Reported Incident (FRI), the facility failed to report to the State Agency an allegation of verbal abuse within two hours after the allegation was reported to the Administrator at approximately 11:20 AM on 01/30/2025. The State Agency did not receive the FRI alleging Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #10 verbally abused Resident Identifier (RI) RI #15, calling RI #15 a stupid mother fucker, until after 3:00 PM on 01/30/2025. This deficient practice affected RI #15; one of three residents sampled for Abuse. Findings Include: A facility policy titled Abuse Policy, updated 8/2022, documented: . The following table describes the different reporting requirements. What is to be reported. All alleged violations of abuse, neglect, . When . All alleged violations- 1) Immediately but no later than 2 hours if the allegation involves abuse . On 01/30/2025 at 3:04 PM, the State Agency (SA) received an Online Incident Report (FRI) from the facility alleging RI #15 was verbally abused by CNA #10 who called RI #15 a Stupid Motherfucker. The FRI documented the Licensed Physical Therapy Assistant (LPTA) became aware of the incident at 10:50 AM and the ADM was made aware of the incident at 11:20 AM. Contained within the facility's investigative file was a handwritten statement signed by the LPTA dated 01/30/2025 at 10:50 AM, which documented the following: Entered (RI #15's room number) and asked (RI #15) how (he/she) was feeling today. (He/she) responded, I'm being abused. That lady called me a 'stupid mother fucker.' When asked who called (him/her) that, (he/she) stated that it was a CNA. On 03/19/2025 at 3:49 PM an interview was conducted with LPTA. The LPTA stated RI #15 told her a CNA called him/her a motherfucker. The LPTA stated she reported the allegation of abuse to her supervisor and the Administrator (ADM). The LPTA stated abuse was to be reported immediately and the incident was verbal abuse. An interview was conducted with the ADM on 03/20/2025 at 11:32 AM. The ADM said he became aware of the abuse allegation involving RI #15 on 01/30/2025 at 11:20 AM and submitted the initial report to the SA on 01/30/2025 at 3:04 PM. A follow-up interview was conducted on 03/21/2025 at 5:38 PM with ADM who said the timeframe for reporting abuse to the SA was no later than two hours after the abuse.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Investigate Abuse (Tag F0610)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, resident record review, review of a facility policy titled Abuse Policy, Facility Reported Incidents (FRIs)...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, resident record review, review of a facility policy titled Abuse Policy, Facility Reported Incidents (FRIs) received by the State Agency, and review of the facility's investigative files, the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation for an incident of verbal abuse and take appropriate corrective actions to prevent recurrence. On 01/30/2025 during resident care Resident Identifier (RI) #15 was verbally abused by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #10 who at the time of the verbal abuse, voiced being frustrated and tired from working double shifts the day prior. Because the facility's investigation failed to identify potential contributing factors of the verbal abuse, the facility was unable to develop and implement any new measures or actions to prevent recurrence. Further, handwritten statements in the investigative file failed to clearly and accurately reflect from whom the statements were obtained; and the facility failed to have any evidence in the investigative file or interviews to ensure other residents had not been verbally abused by CNA #10. This deficient practice was cited as a result of the investigation of complaint/report number AL00050214 and affected RI #15, one of three residents sampled for abuse. Findings Include: A facility policy titled Abuse Policy updated 08/2022 documented: Our residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect . Prevention: . 2. Our abuse prevention/intervention program includes, but is not necessarily limited to, the following: 4. Allowing staff to express frustrations with their job; or in working with difficult residents; 8. Helping staff to deal appropriately with stress and emotions; 17. Identifying areas within the facility that may make abuse and/or neglect more likely to occur . 18. Striving to maintain adequate staffing on all shifts to ensure that the needs of each resident are met . Screening: 1. Monitoring staff on all shifts to identify inappropriate behaviors towards residents (e.g., using derogatory language, rough handling of residents .) 5. Identifying areas within the facility that may make abuse and/or neglect more likely to occur . Protection/Investigation: The facility protects individuals from abuse during investigation of any allegation of abuse. 1. Allegation must be reported to the Administrator and other officials. 2. Investigation will be initiated immediately. 3. Steps will be taken to prevent further potential abuse, and should include: Immediate suspension of the employee pending outcome of the investigation Potential staffing changes Potential increased supervision, Protection from retaliation, and Follow-up counseling for the resident(s). if warranted Corrective measures will be implemented to prevent recurrence. Response: The facility must ensure that any incidents of substantiated abuse are reported and analyzed and the appropriate corrective, remedial, disciplinary action occurs . 11. Upon receiving information concerning a report of abuse, the Director of Nursing Services will request that a representative of the Social Services Department monitor the resident's reactions to and statements regarding the incident and his/her involvement in the investigation. 12. Unless the resident requests otherwise, the social service representative will give the Administrator and the Director of Nursing Services a written report of his/her findings. 13. All phases of the investigation will be kept confidential . medical records. Administrative policies . notification of the resident's representative(sponsor) and Attending Physician . 15. Report to the State nurse aide registry . any knowledge it has of actions .an employee, which would indicate unfitness for service as a nurse aide . Assessment: The nurse will assess the individual and document related findings. Assessment data will include: . q. The physician and staff will help identify risk factors for abuse within the facility . Cause Identification 1. The staff . will investigate alleged occurrences of abuse . to clarify what happened and identify possible causes. Monitoring and Follow-Up 1. The staff . will monitor individuals who have been abused at least until their . mood, and function have stabilized, and periodically thereafter. On 01/30/2025 the State Agency received an Online Incident Report (FRI) from the facility alleging RI #15 was verbally abused by CNA #10, who called RI #15 a Stupid Motherfucker. The FRI documented actions taken included suspending CNA #10 pending the investigation, calling the Mental Health Nurse to review, initiating abuse and customer service in-services, and skin assessments were to be done on all residents with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score less than 12. RI #15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Contained within the facility's investigative file was a handwritten statement signed by the Administrator (ADM) dated 01/30/2025 which documented his interview with RI #15 as follows: . I was asked by a staff member to go see (RI #15) (He/she) was asking for me. I had just been made aware of the allegation of verbal abuse. (RI #15) and I discussed (his/her) issue. (RI #15) discussed with me that some people were treating (him/her) bad. (RI #15) said, (CNA #10s name). I asked (him/her) what was said She called me a stupid motherfucker and was rough with my legs when I was in bed. I told (him/her) that we would take care of (him/her) and (he/she) would not have to worry about that CNA. The handwritten interview also included that RI #15 denied pain and said CNA #10 was the only one who had been mean. The facility investigative file contained a summary of the incident involving RI #15 and CNA #10, signed by the ADM and dated 02/06/2025, documenting that after discussion of the allegation with RI #15, CNA #10 was suspended pending the investigation. The summary documented that discussions were had with the resident, roommate, and staff; statements were taken from each. Based on statements and interviews the facility concluded CNA #10 did curse RI #15 and was inappropriate in her handling of RI #15. The incident of verbal abuse was substantiated by the facility, abuse in-services for all staff were initiated, and they were going to terminate CNA #10. During an interview with the ADM on 03/20/2025 at 11:32 AM he stated, he became aware of RI #15 being verbally abused on 01/30/2025 at 11:20 AM. The ADM said, he went to talk to RI #15 who said the CNA called him/her a stupid motherfucker and was rough with his/her legs. The ADM said, actions taken to protect the alleged victim and other residents from abuse while the investigation was in process included suspension of CNA #10, and statements were obtained from the alleged abuser and witnesses (staff to whom RI #15 reported). When asked about the Mental Health Evaluation performed on RI #15, the ADM said, the psychiatric nurse practitioner was to see RI #15 on her next visit. The facility did not have evidence of a Mental Health visit conducted with RI #15 since the verbal abuse incident had occurred. Contained within the facility's investigative file was a handwritten statement titled Roommate Statement dated 1/30/29 signed by RI #15 and CNA #12 which documented the following: Upon getting the patient ready for lunch (he/she) stated to me that the other CNA that had (him/her) was very mean . and called (him/her) a stupid mother-fucker and (he/she) state that she said she is (tired) of you all acting like yall can't do anything. and (He/she) said, that the CNA was (also) upset because (his/her) clothes was dirty . During a follow up interview with ADM on 03/21/2025 at 5:38 PM the ADM was asked about the handwritten statement titled Roommate Statement since the statement was confusing as to who wrote it and who it was about. The ADM said, it appeared to be what RI #15 told one of the CNAs, it was a statement from the Restorative CNA #12. The ADM said, he did not take a statement from RI #15's roommate who was unable to give a statement, and Roommate Statement was written on the statement in error. When asked what discussions were held with the resident, roommate, and staff, as mentioned in the summary, the ADM said, there were not any discussions other than the handwritten witness statements from staff to whom RI #15 had initially reported to that he/she had been verbally abused. The ADM was asked about the handwritten statements in the investigative file having unclear signatures and not including job classifications because the LPTA's statement signature was not clear and there was no job classification, and CNA #12's statement was titled Roommate Statement and the signature was not clear and had no job classification. When asked how anyone reviewing the file would know who gave or wrote the statements and their job classification, the ADM said, human resources could pull the job classifications, but going forward he would ensure titles were assigned to the statements. Because the facility investigative file review revealed no interviews with other residents nor staff to determine if they had knowledge of any other instances of unreported abuse that involved CNA #10, the ADM was asked if any interviews were conducted with residents to find out if anyone else had been affected by CNA #10. The ADM said, no interviews were conducted with residents after RI #15's verbal abuse. When asked where the root cause analysis was documented, the ADM said, they had not done a root cause analysis to address RI #15's verbal abuse. When asked how the resident abuse could have been prevented, the ADM said, continuing education for abuse and they could have done some burnout training. When asked about a Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) review or action plan, the ADM said, he did not know they were to write out a plan. Contained within the facility's investigative file was a handwritten statement signed by CNA #10 dated 01/30/2025, which documented she was tired and frustrated at the time RI #15 was verbally abused, as follows: I (CNA #10's name) went to (RI #15's) room to change (him/her) to get (him/her) up for activities . I said a few words like I was tired from . doing a double on the previous shift from the day before and I wasn't directly saying it to (RI#15) just whisper it under my breath due to the frustration . In the continued interview with the ADM on 03/21/2025 at 5:38 PM, the ADM was asked what type of supervision or monitoring was in place for staff who worked double shifts or extra hours, to make sure they were not burned out, frustrated, or too tired. The ADM, said, they did not have that. When asked what type of training the staff received specifically about burnout or frustration after working increased hours, the ADM said, there was not one being done. When asked what evidence there was that CNA #10 received training on burnout or frustration prior to her verbal abuse against RI #15, the ADM said, she had not received that type of training. When asked what type of process the facility had to encourage staff to express concerns, the ADM said, they did not have that type of process currently. When asked if Social Services or Mental Health Nurses had evaluated RI #15 after the verbal abuse, the ADM said, no. An interview was conducted on 03/22/2025 at 12:35 PM with Social Services Director (SSD). When asked about RI #15, the SSD said, she just learned of RI #15's abuse during the survey a few days ago and she had not assessed RI #15. The SSD said, she had not been informed a Mental Health Nurse was to evaluate RI #15. The SSD said, she should have been made aware. During an interview with Director of Nursing (DON) on 03/22/2025 at 5:51 PM, she was given a copy of the Facility Reported Incident (FRI) submitted on 01/30/2025 per ADM to read. The DON stated there was no notification of SSD nor the Mental Health Nurse. The DON stated that not notifying the SSD or Mental Health Nurse could have resulted in emotional distress for RI #15.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pressure Ulcer Prevention (Tag F0686)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interview, and resident record review, the facility failed to ensure care was provided in a manner to pre...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interview, and resident record review, the facility failed to ensure care was provided in a manner to prevent skin breakdown. The facility failed to ensure a care planned preventive measure to prevent skin breakdown was implemented for Resident Identifier (RI) #43, a resident with a potential for impaired skin integrity, when unpadded oxygen (O2) tubing was observed behind RI #43's ears. This was observed on 03/18/2025 and 03/19/2025, and had the potential to affect RI #43, one of 18 sampled residents. Findings Include: RI #43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. RI #43's care plan with a need of POTENTIAL FOR IMPAIRED SKIN INTEGRITY had an approach initiated 07/23/2024 for licensed staff to . PAD TUBING AROUND EARS WHEN O2 IS IN USE . On 03/18/2025 at 10:48 AM, the surveyor observed RI #43's O2 in use set at two liters per minutes by way of a nasal cannula/concentrator. There was no padding on the tubing behind RI #43's ears. On 03/18/2025 at 12:18 PM, the tubing behind RI #43's ears remained without padding. On 03/19/2025 at 8:35 AM, RI #43's O2 continued at two liters per minute and the tubing behind RI #43's ears remained unpadded. On 03/19/2025 at 8:53 AM, the surveyor conducted an interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #25. LPN #25 said she did not see padding on the tubing behind RI #43's ears and the tubing should be padded. LPN #25 said it would be important to ensure the tubing behind RI #43's ears was padded to prevent skin breakdown.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0745 (Tag F0745)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, review of the facility Online Incident Report (FRI), review of Resident Identifier (RI) #15's medical recor...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, review of the facility Online Incident Report (FRI), review of Resident Identifier (RI) #15's medical records, and review of a facility policy titled, Abuse Policy, the facility failed to provide appropriate social services to meet RI #15's needs after Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) #10 verbally abuse RI #15 on 01/30/2025. The facility's Social Services Director (SSD) was not aware the abuse policy instructed her to monitor residents' reactions to an incident of abuse and she was not aware that RI #15 had been verbally abused by a CNA. This deficient practice affected RI #15; one of three residents sampled for abuse. This deficiency was cited as a result of the investigation of complaint/report number AL00050214. Findings Include: Review of a facility policy titled, Abuse Policy, updated 08/2022, revealed the following: . Upon receiving information concerning report of abuse, the Director of Nursing Services will request that a representative of the Social Services Department monitor the resident's reactions to and statements regarding the incident and his/her involvement in the investigation. On 01/30/2025, the State Agency received a Facility Reported Incident that alleged that CNA #10 verbally abused RI #15 when RI #15 reported CNA #10 called him/her a stupid motherfucker. This initial report indicated RI #15 would be seen by a mental health nurse. RI #15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Cerebral Infarction, Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis, Lack of Coordination and Muscle Weakness, and Cellulitis of Left and Right Lower Limb. An interview was conducted on 03/22/2025 at 12:35 PM with the Social Services Director (SSD). The SSD said, she had that position since January 6, 2025, and her job duties included assessing residents, attending care plan meetings, care planning, grievances, arranging services, and coordinating services with doctors and other outside services. When asked about RI #15, the SSD said, she just learned of RI #15's abuse during the survey a few days ago. The SSD said, she had not yet assessed RI #15. The SSD said, she had not been informed a Mental Health Nurse was to evaluate RI #15. The SSD said, she should have been made aware. When provided a copy of the abuse policy the SSD identified number 11 under the response section as a SSD task as follows: Upon receiving information concerning a report of abuse, the Director of Nursing Services will request that a representative of the Social Services Department monitor the resident's reactions to and statements regarding the incident and his/her involvement in the investigation. The SSD also identified the following in the Abuse Policy: Protection/Investigation: . 3. Follow-up counseling for the resident(s), if warranted. When asked what was the process she followed once she was made aware of alleged abuse. The SSD stated, she would want to know about the allegation, she would speak to the victim, let them know she had been informed, listen to them, and see what assistance they may need and if required, counseling. The SSD said, she would reach out to the Psychiatric Nurse and make sure the resident was alright. The SSD said, if the resident wanted to talk to her, she would let them know their conversations were confidential and she would let them know she would be speaking to her supervisor and Administrator. The SSD said, she would let them know they could talk to her at any time. The SSD said, the concern of not performing monitoring and assessment after an allegation of abuse, was a lack of communication, the resident not knowing their options, they might think the SSD did not do anything about it, the resident could be reluctant to talk to the SSD in the future, and the resident would not have received their needed counseling. The SSD said, she did not see any notes about Mental Health Nurse visit or evaluation, and she had not received a referral from the DON or Administrator regarding RI #15. During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 03/22/2025 at 5:51 PM, the DON reviewed the abuse policy. The DON stated, the policy instructed upon receiving information concerning a report of abuse the Director of Nursing Services will request that a representative of the Social Services Department monitor the resident's reactions regarding the incident. The DON was asked if she contacted the SSD to evaluate RI #15 and or have the SSD contact the Mental Health Nurse to evaluate RI #15 after the verbal abuse allegation. The DON stated, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #11 was responsible for notifying the SSD. The DON stated there was no documentation that had been done. The DON stated, not notifying the SSD and Psychiatric nurse of the alleged abuse of RI #15 could have caused RI #15 emotional distress regarding the situation. During an interview on 03/20/2025 at 11:28 AM, the Administrator (ADM) stated he became aware of the abuse allegation involving CNA #10 and RI #15 on 01/30/2025 at 11:20 AM. The ADM stated, he interviewed RI #15 and RI #15 told him CNA #10 called him/her a stupid motherfucker and that he/she was afraid of CNA #10. The ADM stated, a mental health evaluation was to be performed by the psychiatric nurse practitioner on her next visit to see RI #15. During a follow up interview with the ADM on 03/21/2025 at 5:38 PM, the ADM said the mental health nurse or psychiatric nurse practitioner had not evaluated RI #15 after the abuse allegation.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Pharmacy Services (Tag F0755)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and resident record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident Identifier (RI) #52's Cyclobenzaprine (Fl...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews and resident record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident Identifier (RI) #52's Cyclobenzaprine (Flexeril) medication was retrieved from RI #308's home, for proper storage and/or disposal, after the medication was accidentally sent home with RI #308 on 01/29/2025. This deficient practice affected RI #52, one of 18 sampled residents. This deficiency was cited as a result of the investigation of complaint/report #AL00050173. Findings Include: RI #308 was admitted to the facility 01/09/2025 and discharged on 01/29/2025. RI #52 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. RI #52's Order Summary Report (Physician Orders) revealed RI #52 was prescribed Flexeril (Cyclobenzaprine HCL (Hydrochloric)) Oral Tablet 5 MG (milligrams) by mouth three times a day for muscle spasms for 14 days. This order had a start date of 01/16/2025. On 03/19/2025 at 9:54 AM, a telephone interview was conducted with RI #308's family member. RI #308's family member said RI #52's Flexeril medication had been sent home with RI #308 when RI #308 was discharged from the facility. The family member said she still had RI #52's medications at home with her. On 03/19/2025 at 8:45 PM, the surveyor conducted a telephone interview with Registered Nurse (RN) #13. RN #13 said she accidentally sent RI #52's medication home with RI #308. RN #13 said she did not know if facility had the medications back from RI #308's family member or not. On 03/20/2025 at 11:00 AM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON said she was informed by RI #308's family member that they had another resident's medications, they had spelled it out, and it was Flexeril. The DON said a resident should never be sent home with another resident's medication. On 03/26/2025 at 3:42 PM, a telephone interview was conducted with the facility's Pharmacist. The Pharmacist said to dispose of medicaitons properly and safely, the facility used a service to pick up medicines if they were not narcotics. When asked could the facility dispose of a residents medications if they went home with another resident and were never returned, the pharmacist said no. When asked what guidance she would have given facility staff if a resident's medications were accidentally sent home with another resident, the Pharmacist said to try to retrieve the medicine from the family and bring them back to the facility.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

QAPI Program (Tag F0867)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interviews, record review, review of facility policies titled Abuse Policy and Quality Assurance Performance Improvement Process, the facility failed to ensure the Quality Assurance and Perfo...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interviews, record review, review of facility policies titled Abuse Policy and Quality Assurance Performance Improvement Process, the facility failed to ensure the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee reviewed and analyzed an allegation of abuse in a manner to determine causes and implement appropriate corrective actions to prevent recurrence. The committee failed to identify concerns with reporting and investigation for an allegation of abuse reported to the State Agency (SA) on 01/30/2025. This deficient practice affected RI #15, one of 18 sampled residents. This deficiency was cited as a result of the investigation of complaint/report number AL00050214. Findings include: Cross-reference F600, F609, F610, and F943. The facility's policy titled Abuse Policy, updated 8-2022 documented: . Response: The facility ensures that any incidents of substantiated abuse are reported and analyzed and the appropriate corrective, remedial or disciplinary action occurs, in accordance with applicable local state or federal law . 7. When an incident of resident abuse of resident abuse is suspected or confirmed, the incident must be immediately reported to facility management regardless of the time lapse since the incident occurred. Cause Identification. 1. The staff with the physicians input (as needed) will investigate alleged occurrence of abuse . to clarify what happened and identify the possible causes. The facility policy titled Quality Assurance and Process Improvement (QAPI) Committee updated 08/04/2022 documented: Purpose: The QAPI committee will monitor systematic, comprehensive, data driven, proactive approach to performance management and improvement that focuses on indicators of the outcome of care and quality of life. 1. The QAPI oversees the quality and effectiveness of living center operations and systems to meet the needs of the customers; to monitor and analyze facility key performances indicators . 10. The QAA Committee to determine if . abuse allegations are: Thoroughly investigated. Whether the resident is protected. Whether an analysis was conducted as to why the situation occurred . The facility Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Meeting for 02/21/2025, documented the facility reviewed a Reportable Incidents for RI #15 who was verbally abused by a CNA. The QAPI documentation indicated that investigations were started, abuse in-services were conducted, the resident was fine, and the CNA was terminated. The QAPI committee failed to identify and develop an action plan for the late reporting of the FRI which was not reported to the SA within the two-hour time frame for abuse. The QAPI committed failed to identify and develop an action plan for failure to conduct a thorough investigation and root cause analysis. The QAPI committee failed to identify all contributing factors of the verbal abuse against RI #15 including the CNA stating that she was tired and frustrated after working a double shift the previous day. The QAPI committee failed to identify any contributing factors associated with staff who may be burned out, tired, or frustrated after working double shifts. On 03/21/2025 at 5:38 PM the ADM was asked about QAPI and root cause analysis, the ADM said, root cause analysis was not done for the incident of staff on resident verbal abuse involving RI #15. When asked about the QAPI committee review and action plan, the ADM said, he did not know they were to write out a plan. During an interview with ADM on 03/22/2025 at 2:17 PM he stated, they reviewed the incident and investigation in Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) and felt like they handled it appropriately. According to QAPI meeting conducted 02/21/2025: Resident is fine. Abuse In-services conducted. CNA has been terminated .
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0943 (Tag F0943)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on interviews, record review, and review of a Facility Reported Incident (FRI), the facility failed to provide and have evidence of abuse prevention training to staff to identify and address fac...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interviews, record review, and review of a Facility Reported Incident (FRI), the facility failed to provide and have evidence of abuse prevention training to staff to identify and address factors that may precipitate abuse/neglect/exploitation, to include signs of staff burnout, frustration, and stress. On 01/30/2025 Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #10 verbally abused Resident Identifier (RI #15) while providing care. CNA #10 voiced she was tired from working a double shift the day before. Further, the facility had failed to provide the Social Serviced Director (SSD) with training on the abuse policy and the SSD did not know to monitor RI #15 after incident of staff on resident verbal abuse. This affected RI #15 one of 18 sampled residents. Findings include: Cross-reference F600 and F745. On 01/30/2025, the State Agency received a FRI alleging CNA #10 verbally abused RI #15. Contained within the facility's investigative file was a handwritten statement signed by CNA #10 dated 01/30/2025 which documented she was tired and frustrated at the time RI #15 was verbally abused, as follows: I (CNA #10's name) went to (RI #15's) room to change (him/her) to get (him/her) up for activities . I said a few words like I was tired from . doing a double on the previous shift from the day before and I wasn't directly saying it to (RI #15) just whisper it under my breath due to the frustration . During an interview with the Administrator (ADM) on 03/21/2025 at 5:38 PM the ADM was asked about CNA #10's abuse training/orientation. The ADM said, the training for Abuse prevention, recognizing, and reporting abuse was done online. When asked what actions had been implemented by the facility to address staff on resident abuse, the ADM stated monthly in-services on abuse. When asked what type of supervision or monitoring was in place for staff who worked double shifts or extras hours, to make sure they were not burned out, frustrated, or too tired, ADM stated, they did not have a plan in place. The ADM said, overtime and abuse were discussed in (town) meetings monthly. The ADM was asked what type of training the staff received related to burnout or frustration after working increased hours and he stated there was no training or process for staff to express concerns. An interview was conducted on 03/22/2025 at 12:35 PM with Social Services Director (SSD). The SSD said, she had that position since January 6, 2025. The SSD said she had not received training on the facility's abuse policy. During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 03/22/2025 at 5:51 PM, the DON was asked who was responsible for orientation of SSD on abuse upon hire. She stated it could be any of management, but the Administrator would be responsible since he was the abuse coordinator. The DON was asked where there would be evidence that SSD was instructed on abuse training; she stated, it should be in the personnel file. On 03/23/2025 at 12:40 PM the Personnel File was received for SSD from the Administrator, for review. When asked if the SSD was present, he stated, no but he could get her to come to facility as soon as possible. On 03/23/2025 at 1:20 PM the SSD arrived at the facility and an interview was conducted. The SSD was shown the abuse policy training titled Abuse Inservice Highlights with the SSD initials on each section and the SSD signature along with the date 01/08/2025. The SSD was asked if the initials and signature on the Abuse Policy were hers and she stated, yes. When asked who witnessed the signature, the SSD stated it was the Human Resources (HR) Director. The SSD was asked, when she signed the policy, to which she replied, this morning, 03/23/2025. The SSD was asked to verify the date on the Abuse training from her personnel folder and she stated 01/08/2025. When asked about the date, the SSD said, she asked what date to put on there and they said 01/08/2025, they told me to back date it. On 03/23/2025 at 5:45 PM an interview was conducted with the Human Resources Director (HR). The signed Abuse Inservice Highlights for the SSD was shown to the HR. When asked when it was signed and dated, the HR stated they both signed the policy on today. The HR said, it was assigned to the SSD on 01/06/2025 for online training but she did not complete the task. The HR was asked who instructed her to contact the SSD and she stated, the ADM contacted her on 03/22/2025 and stated he needed the SSD's personnel file and particularly needed her abuse training. The HR said, when she arrived, she saw the SSD had not signed off on her Abuse Training. The HR said, the SSD did not read and sign the abuse policy until today, which was the mandatory nursing training which included abuse training and residents' rights.
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observations, interviews and a review of the facility policie's titled, DATING AND LABELING POLICY, ICE MACHINE SANITATION POLICY, And HAND WASHING POLICY. The facility failed to ensure: 1) f...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interviews and a review of the facility policie's titled, DATING AND LABELING POLICY, ICE MACHINE SANITATION POLICY, And HAND WASHING POLICY. The facility failed to ensure: 1) food items in the freezer and cooler was labeled and dated; 2) the ice machine was free of a black substance; 3) a staff did not work on the dirty and clean side of the dish room without changing gloves and aprons. This had the potential to affect 53 of 53 residents who received meals from the kitchen. Finding Includes: 1) A review of a policy titled, DATING AND LABELING POLICY, with no date revealed: POLICY: All foods are to be labeled and dated appropriately to ensure food safety regulations are followed. PROCEDURE: . Once opened, the label must be updated with the current date and a use by date . (including date opened) . On 03/18/2025 at 8:39 AM, an during the initial tour of a large clear bag of okra and about six chicken fingers in a bag were observed in the freezer with no open or use by the date. Corn beef was observed in the cooler with no open or use by date. On 03/20/2025 at 12:43 PM, an interview was conducted with the Food Service Director (FSD). The FSD stated that corn beef in the cooler did not have an open and a use by date on it. She stated that the chicken tenders and okra in the freezer did not have an open or use by date on it. She stated staff should label and date food items before putting them back in the freezer or cooler. She continued to say it should be labeled with an opened and use by date on the item. She stated that the food items should have the name of the item on it. On the label it should be the date, the name of the item, the opened date or prepared date, the use by date, and the initial of the person who put it in the freezer. The FSD stated that food should be labeled and dated to keep in within the time line of safe food. She stated that the person who opened the food was responsible for dating and labeling it. The FSD stated that food that was not dated and label could cause food borne illness. The FSD stated that food was supposed to be labeled and dated. 2) A review of a facility's policy titled, ICE MACHINE SANITATION POLICY, with no date revealed: POLICY: kitchen staff will wash, rinse and sanitize the ice making machine . On 03/18/2025 at 8:39 AM, black substance was observed on the ice guard and lid on the inside of the ice machine in the kitchen. On 03/20/2025 at 12:52 PM, an interview was conducted with the FSD. The FSD was asked what was on the lid and guard on the inside of the ice machine. She stated that it was dirty with debris. She was asked why was it there and she said the machine had not been serviced. The FSD said she was responsible for making sure the ice machine was clean on the inside. The FSD stated that it was important that the ice machine was clean on the inside to make sure no bacteria or infection disease got into the ice that was served to the residents. The FSD said the ice machine lid and guard was cleaned monthly. 3) A review of an undated facility policy titled, HAND WASHING POLICY . revealed: . When to Wash Hands . Before and in between switching tasks. On 03/20/2025 at 8:59 AM, during an observation in dishware washing in the kitchen, one staff taking dirty trays and plates out of a cart and another staff was at the dish machine rinsing dishes. Dietary Aide (DA) #23 was on the dirty side of the dish room wearing gloves and an apron. She was rinsing off dishes, washing plates, trays, and plates covers. Her apron was touching dirty trays. She pulled dish ware out of the dish machine on the clean side of the dish room without changing the dirty apron or gloves. She removed dish ware on the clean side from the dish machine with the same gloves she used on the dirty side of the dish room. She was touching clean dishes, cups, plate covers, trays. She did not change her gloves or apron when she moved from the dirty side to the clean side to put clean items up. She was working both sides of the dish room. At the same time, DA #24 was observed not wearing gloves. He was on the dirty side washing out glasses to be placed in the dish machine. He left the dirty side with the same apron on and began putting up dishes on the clean side. DA #24 carried plate covers and plates out of the clean side of the dish room. The clean dishes were touching his apron as he put up the dishes. On 03/20/2025 at 9:12 AM, an interview was conducted with DA #23 who said she did she use the same gloves on the dirty and clean side of the dish room. She was asked why did she use the same gloves on the dirty side and clean side of the dish room. She stated she was a new employee. She stated that she worked both side of the dish room when someone was out. DA #23 said she did not change her apron from the dirty side to the clean side of the dish room. DA #23 stated that when she finished washing the dishes she should have changed her gloves. DA #23 was asked why should kitchen staff not work on the clean and dirty side of the dish room with the same gloves and apron. DA #23 stated because of cross-contamination 03/20/2025 at 12:31 PM, an interview was conducted with DA #24 who said he did not change his apron before went to the clean side after he rinsed out dishes on the dirty side. DA #24 stated he did not change the apron because he was so busy he did not think about it. On 03/20/2025 at 12:52 PM, an interview was conducted with the FSD. The FSD was asked why did the dietary aide work on the clean side and dirty side of the dish room. The FSD stated the person on the dirty side work both side because the new people were slow. The FSD said she was responsible for training kitchen staff on infection control in the kitchen. The FSD said it was cross-contamination when staff was worked on the clean and dirty side of the dish room with the same gloves and apron. The FSD said residents could get sick from the cross-contamination.
Oct 2024 5 deficiencies
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Menu Adequacy (Tag F0803)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on observations, interviews, review of a facility policy titled Menus and Adequate Nutrition, review of a facility report titled Diet Type Report, and review of facility menus, the facility fail...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interviews, review of a facility policy titled Menus and Adequate Nutrition, review of a facility report titled Diet Type Report, and review of facility menus, the facility failed to ensure Pureed Chocolate Cream Pie was prepared and served to residents as planned. This affected Resident Identifier (RI) #9, RI #2, RI #30, and RI #48, all four of (4) residents in the facility with orders for a pureed diet. Findings include: A facility policy titled Menus and Adequate Nutrition with a revised date of 09/16/2024 documented: The purpose of this policy is to assure menus are developed and prepared to meet resident choices including their nutritional . needs, . while using established guidelines. 3. Menus will be followed as posted. A facility report titled Diet Type Report dated 10/09/2024 documented four residents, RI #9, RI #2, RI #30 and RI #48, received a pureed texture diet. A facility menu for Wednesday, (week five) documented four ounces (4 oz) of Chocolate Cream Pie was to be included with the pureed lunch. On 10/09/2024 at 11:25 AM during observation of the lunch tray line, pureed meal trays were prepared to include yogurt instead of the 4 oz serving of pureed chocolate pie as specified in the menu. On 10/09/2024 at 12:30 PM, during an observation of the lunch meal service in the main dining room, RI #9, RI #2, and RI #30 were served a pureed meal that included yogurt rather than pureed chocolate pie. On 10/09/2024 at 12:45 PM RI #48 received a pureed lunch meal that included yogurt instead of pureed chocolate pie. On 10/09/2024 at 4:30 PM the Registered Dietician (RD) was asked about the residents on pureed diets not receiving pureed pie for lunch as per the menu. The RD said, staff know to follow the menu and she was unsure why the menu was not followed. The RD said, the residents who received pureed diets should have received the pie because it was on the menu and they should receive the same quality food as other residents in the facility. The RD said, the menu should always be followed to ensure residents received the correct items. On 10/09/2024 at 5:08 PM the Dietary Manager (DM) was asked why residents who received pureed diets received yogurt instead of pie for lunch. The DM said, the cook did not puree the pie. The DM said, the cook had the proper equipment to puree the pie, had access to a menu, and was aware the menu should be followed. When asked why it was important for residents to receive the correct menu items, the DM said, residents should receive what was on the menu to meet their needs.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0847 (Tag F0847)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on resident record review, interviews, and review of the facility admission Agreement, the facility failed to ensure the b...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on resident record review, interviews, and review of the facility admission Agreement, the facility failed to ensure the binding arbitration agreement within the admission agreement contained a statement, in a clear and detailed manner explaining to recipients, neither the resident or their representative was required to sign the agreement as a condition of admission or to receive care in the facility and the resident or resident's representative had the right to rescind the agreement within thirty (30) days of signing the agreement. This affected Resident Identifier (RI) #3, RI #29 and RI #40, all three (3) residents reviewed for arbitration agreements and had the potential to affect all residents who signed a binding arbitration agreement issued by the facility. Findings include: RI #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A facility admission Agreement containing an arbitration agreement dated 09/06/2022 was signed by RI #3's Resident Representative. RI #29 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. A facility admission Agreement containing an arbitration agreement dated 12/20/2022 was signed by RI #29. RI #40 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A facility admission Agreement containing an arbitration agreement dated 10/04/2023 was signed by RI #40's Resident Representative. The facility admission Agreement reviewed for RI #3, RI #29, and RI #40 failed to contain documentation, in a clear and detailed manner explaining to the recipients, that neither the resident or their representative was required to sign the agreement as a condition of admission or to receive care in the facility and the resident or resident's representative had the right to rescind the agreement within thirty (30) days of signing the agreement. On 10/10/2024 at 3:24 PM the Admissions Director (AD) was asked about the current binding arbitration agreement used by the facility. The AD was unsure when the agreement had been updated. The AD was asked if language in the agreement gave parties the right to refuse to sign the agreement and allowed parties the right to rescind the agreement within thirty (30) days of signing. The AD stated, those provisions were not currently included in the document. On 10/10/2024 at 4:30 PM the Administrator (ADM) reviewed the current binding arbitration agreement and said, it was currently being used by the facility, he was not sure when it had been updated, and the document did not contain the correct wording and language.
CONCERN (E)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0848 (Tag F0848)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on resident record review, interviews, and review of the facility admission Agreement, the facility failed to ensure the b...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on resident record review, interviews, and review of the facility admission Agreement, the facility failed to ensure the binding arbitration agreement within the admission agreement contained a statement, in a clear and detailed manner, explaining the provision for selection of a neutral arbitrator agreed upon by both parties and the selection of a venue that was convenient to both parties. This affected Resident Identifier (RI) #3, RI #29 and RI #40, all three (3) residents reviewed for arbitration agreements and had the potential to affect all residents who signed a binding arbitration agreement issued by the facility. Findings include: RI #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A facility admission Agreement containing an arbitration agreement dated 09/06/2022 was signed by RI #3's Resident Representative. RI #29 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. A facility admission Agreement containing an arbitration agreement dated 12/20/2022 was signed by RI #29. RI #40 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A facility admission Agreement containing an arbitration agreement dated 10/04/2023 was signed by RI #40's Resident Representative. The facility admission Agreement reviewed for RI #3, RI #29, and RI #40 failed to contain documentation, in a clear and detailed manner explaining to the recipients, the provision for selection of a neutral arbitrator agreed upon by both parties and the selection of a venue that was convenient to both parties. On 10/10/2024 at 3:24 PM the Admissions Director (AD) was asked about the current binding arbitration agreement used by the facility. The AD was unsure of the last update of this agreement. When asked about whether the agreement permitted for the selection of a neutral arbitrator mutually agreed upon by both parties and included provisions for choosing a venue convenient for both, the AD confirmed that such provisions were not present in the current document. When asked about settled disputes, the AD said that no disputes had been resolved through binding arbitration since 2019. On 10/10/2024 at 4:30 PM the Administrator (ADM) reviewed the current binding arbitration agreement and said, it was currently being used by the facility, he was not sure when it was updated, and it did not contain the correct wording and language as required.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Garbage Disposal (Tag F0814)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interviews, and a review of a facility policy titled Garbage and Trash Disposal Policy the facility failed to ensure the grounds around the kitchen were free of discarded pallets...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interviews, and a review of a facility policy titled Garbage and Trash Disposal Policy the facility failed to ensure the grounds around the kitchen were free of discarded pallets during initial tour of the kitchen on 10/08/2024. This had the potential to attract rodents and pests and to affect all 49 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: An undated facility policy titled Garbage and Trash Disposal Policy documented: . The Dining Services Director coordinates with the Directors of Maintenance and Housekeeping to ensure that the areas surrounding the exterior dumpster area is maintained in a manner free of rubbish or other debris. On 10/08/2024 at 9:05 AM, during the initial tour of the kitchen with the Dietary Manager (DM), the surveyor observed 20-25 discarded pallets outside the kitchen backdoor, near the facility dumpsters. The DM said, the pallets had been there for at least two weeks, from deliveries to the facility. When asked about the concern of the discarded pallets,the DM said, the discarded pallets were a shelter for pests or rodents, potentially allowing them to enter the building. An interview was conducted with the Registered Dietician (RD) on 10/09/2024 at 4:30 PM. When asked about the discarded pallets, the RD said, pallets should not be stacked outside the kitchen back door and should instead be placed in a dumpster. The RD said, the pallets were left there following deliveries to the facility and had remained there for several weeks. The RD said, the concern would be a potential for pests or rodents.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Room Equipment (Tag F0908)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interviews, and review of a facility policy titled Maintenance Service the facility failed to ensure kitchen equipment were maintained in working order and kept in good repair. T...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interviews, and review of a facility policy titled Maintenance Service the facility failed to ensure kitchen equipment were maintained in working order and kept in good repair. The steamer and a plate warmer were observed in non-working order on 10/09/2024. This had the potential to affect all residents receiving meals from the facility's kitchen, 49 of 49 residents. Findings include: A facility policy titled Maintenance Service revised 10/2009 documented: . Maintenance service shall be provided to all areas of the building, grounds, and equipment. 3. The Maintenance Director is responsible for developing and maintaining a schedule of maintenance service to assure that the buildings, grounds, and equipment are maintained in a safe and operable manner. On 10/09/2024 at 11:01 AM on the second day of kitchen observations, the steamer was not in working order and one side of the plate warmer was not in working order. On 10/09/2024 at 11:15 AM the Dietary Manager (DM) reported that the steamer had not worked for at least two weeks and was used for steaming food such as vegetables and for reheating food. When asked about the importance of the steamer, the DM said, it was as important as the oven. The DM further stated, one side of the plate warmer was not working and he was unsure how long it had been broken. The DM said, the plate warmer was used to warm the plate to ensure food stays warm. The DM said, it would be important for the plate warmer to be working to ensure food remains warm. An interview was conducted with the Registered Dietitian (RD) on 10/09/2024 at 4:30 PM. When asked about kitchen equipment the RD said, equipment in the kitchen should be in working order. She said, it was more convenient for staff to have a working steamer and the plate warmer was used to aid in keeping food at an appropriate temperature before it was served to the residents.
Sept 2024 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, resident record review, review of a facility policy titled Abuse Policy, review of a Facility Reported Inci...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, resident record review, review of a facility policy titled Abuse Policy, review of a Facility Reported Incident (FRI) received by the State Agency, and review of the facility's investigative file, the facility failed to protect Resident Identifier (RI) #1 and RI #2 from physically abusing each other on 07/30/2024. This deficient practice affected RI #1 and RI #2; two residents reviewed for resident-to-resident altercation. Findings Include: Review of a facility policy titled Abuse Policy, updated 08/2022, revealed the following: Our residents have the right to be free from abuse . Policy Interpretation and Implementation Definitions To help with recognition of incidents of abuse, the following definitions of abuse are provided: 1. Abuse is defined as the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish . Willful, as used in this definition of abuse, means the individual must have acted deliberately, not that the individual must have intended to inflict injury or harm . RI #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], with diagnoses to include Unspecified Dementia, Unspecified Severity, with other Behavioral Disturbance, Anxiety Disorder, Disorder of Brain, Pseudobulbar Affect, and Delusional Disorders. RI #1's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 07/15/2024, identified RI #1 to have short-term and long-term memory problems and severely impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making. RI #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of Unspecified Dementia, Unspecified Severity, without Behavioral Disturbance, Psychotic Disturbance, Mood Disturbance, and Anxiety. RI #2's Quarterly MDS assessment, with an ARD of 07/19/2024, identified RI #2 to score 0 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status, indicating RI #2 had severely impaired cognition. The Alabama Department of Public Health Online Incident Reporting System form, submitted on 07/30/2024 at 2:04 PM documented: . Incident Type . Abuse - Physical . Incident Detail . Name(s) of resident(s) involved: (RI #1 VS (verses) RI #2) . Name of alleged perpetrator(s): (RI #1) . Narrative summary of incident: Resident (RI #1) and resident (RI #2) among other residents were in the dining room waiting for lunch to be served. After interviewing residents and staff in the dining room, it was revealed that resident (RI #1) approached resident (RI #2) and slapped (him/her), leading to both residents slapping and hitting one another. Both residents were immediately separated and ensured of safety . What was reported and to whom . Resident to resident, physical altercation. (Name of the LPN [Licensed Practical Nurse]/Unit Manager [UM]), 2nd floor Unit Manager notified DON (Director of Nursing). DON notified the LNHA (Licensed Nursing Home Administrator) . Describe any injury to alleged victims(s) . Skin assessments were completed on both residents involved in the incident. Resident (RI #1) was noted to have bruising/scratches to (his/her) right foreman. Resident (RI #2) did not have any skin issues identified . Action (s) taken by the facility in response to the incident. Both residents were immediately separated and ensured of safety. Resident (RI #1) was sent out for an evaluation. Upon return, resident will be moved to a new room on a different floor. Monitoring has been put in place for any changes from either resident's baseline. MD (Medical Doctor) and Psych NP (Nurse Practitioner) notified and will follow up. A review of the facility's Summary of Investigation, dated 08/05/2024, revealed the following: . Upon completion of the investigation of resident (RI #1) vs (RI #2), resident to resident, physical altercation, the facility has decided to substantiate the incident as physical abuse. The action plan to prevent the recurrence of any resident-to-resident abuse began on 07/30/2024 and was completed on 08/5/2024. The Psych NP plans to follow up with both residents on 8/8/2024 for any adverse effects and ongoing behavior monitoring . Review of a PSYCHIATRIC PERIODIC EVALUATION report, revealed RI #1 was seen by the NP on 08/06/2024. The report revealed the following: . History of Present Illness: [AGE] year-old (male/female) with a history significant for dementia with behavioral disturbance seen today after (he/she) initiated an altercation with another resident. pt (patient) rolling in hallways calm and cooperative during exam with pleasant demeanor but limited secondary to impaired cognition . Review of a PSYCHIATRIC PERIODIC EVALUATION report, revealed RI #2 was seen by the NP on 08/06/2024. The report revealed the following: . History of Present Illness: [AGE] year-old (male/female) with a history significant for dementia seen today for followup to mood and behaviors after she was the subject of abuse from another resident. pt sitting in chair calm and cooperate with good eye contact and reports I'm doing good . The facility's investigative file contained a handwritten Witness Statement, dated 07/30/2024, signed by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #4 which documented: I was in the Dining Room talking to (LPN/UM). When I Looked Around Residents (RI #1) & (and) Resident (RI #2) was hitting One Another. So Me and (LPN/UM) Ran over and Separated them I took (RI #1) to the 3rd floor and stayed with (him/her) until Nurse came and assessed. 09/18/2024 at 11:17 AM, the surveyor conducted an interview with CNA #4. CNA #4 said when she first entered the dining room on 07/30/2024, RI #1 was sitting in a Wheelchair (WC) at a table and RI #2 was sitting in his/her WC at a different table. CNA #4 said she was talking to the LPN/UM and someone hollered hey. CNA #4 said it might have been RI #2 because RI #2 will say hey sometimes. CNA #4 said when she turned around, she saw the residents hitting each other with their hands. CNA #4 said she immediately ran over to where the residents were and separated them. CNA #4 said she took RI #1 back to the 3rd floor to his/her room and waited for the nurse to come and assess RI #1. When asked what type of abuse would this incident be considered, CNA #4 said physical, they were both hitting each other. CNA #4 said to ensure an incident like this one would not reoccur RI #1 was moved to the 2nd floor. Contained within the facility's investigative file was a handwritten statement written by the LPN/UM, dated 07/30/2024. The handwritten statement documented the following: I was in the dining room talking with a CNA and saw (RI #1) and (RI #2) in a physical alteration The CNA (and) I separated both residents The CNA took (RI #1) upstairs, and I took (RI #2) into the conference room. I immediately notified the DON. I did not see who started the fight. On 09/18/2024 at 2:59 PM, the surveyor conducted an interview with the LPN/UM. The LPN/UM said she and another CNA were in the dining room waiting for lunch to be served when all of a sudden, they heard a commotion. The LPN/UM said when she turned towards where the residents were sitting, RI #1 and RI #2 both had their hands up in the air hitting each other. The LPN/UM said she did not see who started the incident. When asked what type of abuse would this incident be considered, the LPN/UM said physical. The LPN/UM said from what she saw, both residents were hitting each other. The LPN/UM said after the incident RI #1 was sent to the ER (Emergency Room) and came back on antibiotics for a UTI (Urinary Tract Infection). The LPN/UM said to ensure an incident like this would nor reoccur between the residents; they were separated immediately, and permanently, by moving RI #1 down to another unit, RI #1 was treated for his/her behavior which was due to a UTI, staff in-services were done, RI #1 was to be observed every two hours, and if no additional behaviors occurred, RI #1 was to be monitor for his/her behaviors every shift which was being done. On 09/18/2024 at 4:06 PM, an interview was conducted with the Social Services Director (SSD). The SSD said she was first made aware of the incident occurring between RI #1 and RI #2 on 07/30/2024. The SSD said she was told by the DON that RI #1 and RI #2 were in the dining room when RI #1 approached RI #2 and slapped RI #2. When asked who witnessed the incident, the SSD said statements came from RI #5, RI #4 and RI #3 which indicated RI #1 was the aggressor. The SSD said this incident would be considered physical abuse; resident-on-resident altercation. RI #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. RI #5's Quarterly MDS assessment, with an ARD of 07/12/2024, identified RI #5 scored a 15 of 15 on the BIMS, indicating RI #5 was cognitively intact. The facility's investigative file contained a statement given by RI #5 on 07/30/2024, which documented the following: . I just seen (RI #1) hit this one and next thing I knew they was slapping and hitting one another . (RI #1) started it . On 09/18/2024 at 5:15 PM an interview was conducted with RI #5. When asked what she could tell the surveyor about an incident occurring in the dining room back on 07/30/2024 where two residents were hitting each other, RI #5 said RI #1 passed by the other resident and popped the resident on the hand. RI #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. RI #4's Quarterly MDS assessment, with an ARD of 06/26/2024, identified RI #4 scored a 15 of 15 on the BIMS, indicating RI #4 was cognitively intact. The facility's investigative file contained a statement given by RI #4 on 07/30/2024, which documented the following: . (RI #1) got into (RI #2's) face words were going back and forth (RI #1) hit (RI #2) first, Resident was separated . On 09/18/2024 at 5:34 PM an interview was conducted with RI #4. When asked what she could tell the surveyor about an incident occurring in the dining room back on 07/30/2024 where two residents were hitting each other, RI #4 said she remembered RI #1 kept rolling his/her wheelchair up on RI #2 and RI #2 kept telling RI #1 to leave him/her alone. RI #4 said RI #1 made first contact and hit RI #2 on his/her arm and then they stated hitting each other. RI #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. RI #3's Annual MDS assessment, with an ARD of 06/01/2024, identified RI #3 scored a 15 of 15 on the BIMS, indicating RI #3 was cognitively intact. The facility's investigative file contained a statement given by RI #3 on 07/30/2024, which documented the following: . (RI #1) started it all Tried to take another person's Drink. (RI #1) hit the (man/woman) that wears the hat . On 09/19/2024 at 9:23 AM, an interview was conducted with the DON. The DON said on 07/30/2024, approximately around 12:10 PM, the LPN/UM informed her there had been a resident-on-resident altercation in the dining room between RI #1 and RI #2. The DON said the LPN/UM said when she turned around, she saw both residents with their arms/hands in the air hitting at each other. The DON said the LPN/UM said the residents were immediately separated and the CNA who saw it took RI #1 upstairs to the nurse. When asked what type abuse this incident would be considered, the DON said physical; a resident-on-resident altercation. The DON said both RI #1 and RI #2 were cognitively impaired. The surveyor asked the DON how did she think a reasonable person would feel to be hit by someone. The DON said a reasonable person would not feel happy about being hit and may want to lash back out. The DON said to ensure an incident like this one would not reoccur with the residents, they were immediately separated and placed on different halls, RI #1's behaviors were being monitored, and the residents were seen by Psych to see if there was a need for medication adjustments. The DON said it was determined the root cause analysis of RI #1 hitting RI #2 was RI #1 had a UTI; and RI #1 had not exhibited any behaviors of hitting anyone since the incident. Review of a Physicians Order for RI #1, dated 07/30/2024, revealed RI #1 was to receive Keflex Oral Capsule 500 mg (milligrams) one capsule two times a day for UTI until 08/04/2024. One capsule was to be administered every 12 hours for five days. ********************************************************** The facility took the following immediate corrective actions: 07/30/2024 at approximately 12:07 PM - RI #1 and RI #2 were among other residents in the dining room, when LPN/UM, UM for 2nd floor and CNA observed the two residents slapping and hitting each other. - The two residents were immediately separated and ensured of safety. RI #1 was escorted to the third floor while RI #2 was escorted to the conference room. - During this time, the 2nd Floor Unit Manager also called and reported the incident to the DON. The DON called and notified the LNHA. 07/30/2024 between 12:07 PM-1:02 PM -Skin assessments were completed for each resident. Assigned LPN assessed RI #1 and RI #1 was noted to have some scratches and bruising on his/her right forearm. LPN/UM assessed RI #2 with no skin issues identified. -During this time, the SSD and 2nd floor UM also collected witness statements from residents in the dining room. Upon collecting witness statements, it was revealed that RI #1 was the aggressor as RI #1 approached RI #2 and made the initial strike. -The two residents were also interviewed and could not recall or give specific details related to the incident. -The MD and Psych NP were notified at approximately 12:50 PM. Orders were received to monitor RI #1 for anxiety and aggression Q (every) 2 hours for 48 hours, then, Q shift if no behaviors were observed. -The facility also received orders to transfer RI #1 to the ER (Emergency Room) for further evaluation. -Orders were then received to monitor RI #2 for anxiety Q shift. -RI #1's friend was in the facility and notified of the incident and orders received. -RI #2's responsible party notified of the incident and order received. -RI #1 departed from the facility via EMS (Emergency Medical Services) at approx. 1:02 PM to ER. 07/30/2024 at 3:00 PM -The IDT (Interdisciplinary)/QAPI (Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement) committee held an AD HOC QAPI meeting to discuss the incident, possible triggers, and an action plan to prevent the incident from reoccurring. No triggers were identified as neither resident could recall the incident and had no history of reported aggression toward one another. -The action plan consisted of moving RI #1 from his/her current room, which was on the same unit and down the hall from RI #2, to room on different floor to further separate the two residents upon RI #1's return from the hospital. -Nursing staff completed skin assessments on all residents in the dining room, at the time of the incident, with a BIMS score less than and equal to 12, to ensure that no other residents were physically harmed during the incident. No skin issues were found. -The SSD interviewed residents in the dining room, at the time of the incident, with a BIMS score greater than 12, for possible psychological effects from the incident. No adverse effects were noted. -The LPN, Care Plan Coordinator was assigned to update RI #1's and RI #2's care plans to reflect the incident and to ensure that appropriate interventions were put into place. -Care plans were revised and updated by 07/31/2024 to include increased supervision of RI #1 when in common areas of the facility with RI #2. -Education was given by DON to the IDT/QAPI committee on resident-to-resident abuse and the abuse checklist. -Each department manager was then assigned to educate their staff with the same in-service. This action plan was completed by 08/05/2024. On 7/30/2024 at approximately 6:50 PM and ongoing -RI #1 returned from the hospital, where he/she was found to have a UTI. RI #1 returned to room located on a separate unit from RI #2 -RI #1 returned with a new prescription for Keflex 500 mg to be administered 1 capsule by mouth twice daily for 5 days for UTI. -The Infection Preventionist was assigned to in-service nursing staff on UTI prevention to include proper technique of peri-care, hand washing, and increased hydration. -The incident, including the root cause analysis, was reported to the IDT/QAPI committee for further review/monitoring at future QAPI meetings. *********************************************************** Upon observations, review and verification of the information provided in the facility's corrective action plan, in-service/education records, the facility's investigation, as well as staff interviews, the survey team determined the facility implemented corrective actions from 07/30/2024 to 08/05/2024, with on-going monitoring implemented; thus, past noncompliance was cited.
Apr 2024 16 deficiencies 4 IJ (3 facility-wide)
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, medical record review, review of the facility's policies titled Wandering and Elopements, and Elopement Gui...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, medical record review, review of the facility's policies titled Wandering and Elopements, and Elopement Guideline and review of a facility document summarizing the facility's investigation into Resident Identifier (RI) #1's elopement, facility failed: 1) to supervise RI #1 after he/she stated he/she had a desire to leave and was given a one-time dose of Ativan, 2) to ensure all doors in the building were secure and closed properly to prevent residents leaving the facility without staff's knowledge, and 3) to ensure RI #1 was not left by a staff member in an unsafe environment. On 02/05/2023, RI #1 told the staff he/she wanted to leave the facility around 1:10 PM. RI #1 was given Ativan, a psychotropic medication, at 2:21 PM, then was not supervised nor observed. RI #1 left the facility through an unsecured door. RI #1 was seen by an off-duty staff member at approximately 3:30 PM on a busy two-lane road near the facility. The staff member did not stay with the resident to provide supervision and left RI #1 in an unsafe environment. RI #1 was not returned to the facility until another off-duty staff member returned him/her to the facility at approximately 4:10 PM. It was determined the facility's non-compliance with one or more requirements of participation had caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to residents. The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was related to State Operations Manual, Appendix PP, 483.25 (d) Free of Accident Hazards/Supervision/Devises at a scope and severity of J. On 04/06/2024 at 12:44 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON), Owner, and Regional Consultant (via phone) were provided a copy of the Immediate Jeopardy Template and notified of the findings of substandard quality of care at the Immediate Jeopardy level in the area of Quality of Care, at F689-Free of Accident Hazards/Supervision/Devices. The IJ began on 02/05/2023 and continued until 04/09/2024. On 04/09/2024 the immediate jeopardy was removed, F689 was lowered to the lower severity of no actual harm with a potential for more than minimal harm that was not immediate jeopardy, to allow the facility time to monitor and/or revise their corrective actions as necessary to achieve substantial compliance. This deficiency was cited as a result of the investigation of complaint/report number AL00043280. Findings include: A facility policy titled, Wandering and Elopements with an updated date of 07/06/2021, documented, Policy Statement The facility will identify residents who are at risk of unsafe wandering and strive to prevent harm while maintaining the least restrictive environment for residents. Policy Interpretation and Implementation . 2. If an employee observes a resident leaving the premises, he/she should: . C. Instruct another staff member to inform the Charge Nurse or Director of Nursing Services that a resident is attempting to leave or has left the premises. A facility policy titled, Elopement Guideline dated of 07/06/2021, documented, Purpose Elopement occurs when a resident leaves the premises or a safe area without authorization (i.e., an order for discharge or leave of absence) and/or any necessary supervision to do so. The facility's initial report titled Alabama Department of Public Health Online Incident Reporting System dated of 02/05/2023, documented, . Narrative summary of incident: (Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #11) alerted staff that (RI #1) eloped around 3:20 PM. An off duty nurse was driving to the facility and saw (RI #1) on the side of the road . She asked him/her to get in her car and he/she complied. She drove him/her to the facility. He/she told the staff that he/she saw someone go out the side door . and followed her out. He/she said he/she .was going to buy beer . Actions taken by the facility in response to the incident . Facility will be notifying the hospital in report that (RI #1) should stay at the hospital for an assessment to see if there is a medical reason for his/her agitation and some confusion noted . The facility's investigation documentation titled 5 Day Investigation Report dated 02/10/2023, documented, . It was reported on February 5, 2023, that (RI #1) had eloped from the facility . and was found . walking . (CNA #11) saw him/her when she was leaving the facility . She pulled over in an attempt to get him/her to go back to the facility with her but he/she kept refusing. She drove back to the facility and had front desk person call a code . An agency employee who was on her way to the facility . picked him/her up and brought him/her back to the facility. (RI #1) told the staff that he/she was watching staff go out the side door when he/she saw someone go out and noticed that the door wasn't shut so he/she pushed on the door and was able to get out. He/she told them he/she got his/her money ($30) Friday and was walking to get a beer. Prior to this incident, (RI #1) had been exhibiting agitation and was wanting to get out of the facility. This behavior was noted around 1:15 PM the day of the incident. The DON and Medical Director were notified and orders to give him/her a one-time dose of 1 mg Lorazepam for the agitation stemming from Altered Mental Status was obtained along with an order to send out to hospital if the symptoms continued to worsen. Before they had a chance to discharge (him/her), the resident had already eloped. RI #1 has a BIMS (Brief Interview Mental Status) score of 12 . The agitation and insistence on leaving the facility by walking has not been (his/her) norm . RI #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Cerebral Infraction and Altered Mental Status. RI #1's Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference date of 01/02/2023, documented RI #1 had a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 of 15, which means RI #1 was moderately cognitive impaired. Section G of the MDS indicated RI #1's walking ability with or without assistive device was not steady and he/she was only able to stabilize himself/herself with staff's assistance. RI #1's Progress Notes included a Behavior Note dated of 02/05/2024 at 1:15 PM that documented, .Resident is walking around the second floor yelling and screaming (he/she) is about to leave here, and (he/she) is calling the police and will jump out the window if (he/she) has to. The note further indicated the DON and MD were contacted and an order was received for one-time dose of Ativan (lorazepam). The note indicated to contact his/her family and also if his/her behavior continued to send him/her to hospital for evaluation. The note was electronically signed by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #18. A review RI #1's Medication Administration Record for February 2023 indicated lorazepam 1 (one) milligram oral tablet was administered on 02/05/2023 at 2:21 PM. A telephone interview was conducted with CNA #11 on 04/03/2024 at 12:32 PM. CNA #11 stated on 02/05/2023, around 3:30 PM, after leaving the building she saw RI #1 walking on the side of the road. CNA #11 said RI #1 was kind of stumbling which made her think he/she was getting tired. She stated she turned her car around and tried to pick up RI #1, but RI #1 refused. She stated after RI #1 refused, she went to the facility to let them know RI #1 was up the street and they needed to call a code. CNA #11 said that she should have stayed with RI #1, called the facility to let them know a resident had gotten out of the facility and waited for someone to come to assist her. CNA #11 said RI #1 had gotten hysterical, and she panicked. CNA #11 said it was a poor decision on her part. She stated RI #1 started getting loud, yelling, and cursing. An interview was conducted with CNA #13 on 04/04/2024 at 4:09 PM. CNA #13 stated after RI #1 was returned to the facility, she asked RI #1 why did he/she leave the facility. She stated, RI #1 told her the football game was on and he/she wanted some beer. CNA #13 stated that RI #1 said that he/she watched girl go out the door, and then he/she just kicked it with his/her feet and went out the door. CNA #13 said the RI #1 exited through the door used by staff. An interview was conducted with CNA #14 at 4:34 PM. CNA #14 stated on 02/05/2023, she saw RI #1 on the second floor. RI #1 told her that he/she was going to get himself/herself some cigarettes and some beer. CNA #14 said that she told RI #1 to not leave the facility. She stated she was not assigned to RI #1 on that day; however, she informed the nurse about his/her behavior. CNA #14 stated after she informed the nurse of RI #1's behavior she did not see RI #1 anymore, she assumed he/she went back upstairs. A telephone interview was conducted with CNA #15 on 04/04/2024 at 5:00 PM. CNA #15 stated RI #1 left out the facility through a side door. She stated staff had to make sure it was closed all the way or it would not be closed. CNA #15 said the door had been that way as long as she could recall and had worked at the facility two years. An interview was conducted with the Maintenance Director (MTD) on 04/04/2024 at 5:20 PM. The MTD stated the side door was not broken. He stated the CNAs would leave the door open when they took the trash out. He said the staff would make it look like the door was closed and just rest it on the latch, so they would not have to go all the way around to the front door to reenter. A telephone interview was conducted with the Former Administrator #1 on 04/03/2024 at 7:36 PM. The FA #1 said she was unsure of what interventions were put in place after RI #1 stated earlier in the day that he/she wanted to leave the building. She stated RI #1 exited the facility through the side door which was used by staff. She stated the facility had issues with that door closing. The FA #1 stated RI #1 was found a half mile from the facility. The FA #1 said the resident usually used a rolling walker and it was found at the top of the hill near the entrance to the facility. The FA #1 stated per protocol, the staff should have tried to get the resident to come back to the facility when the staff saw a resident off the premises. The FA #1 continued to say, if the resident would not return with that staff, the staff should stay with the resident and call the facility for help. The FA #1 said CNA #11 did not follow the facility's protocol. An interview was conducted with the Physical Therapy Director (PTD) on 04/24/2024 at 3:50 PM. The PTD said RI #1 was unable to walk without the use of his/her rolling walker. A follow-up interview was conducted with the FA #1 on 04/05/2024 at 3:02 PM. The FA #1 stated she was unsure why staff did not keep an eye on RI #1 when he/she told staff he/she wanted to leave the building and had been given lorazepam on 02/05/2023. She was asked what interventions were in place to prevent RI #1 from leaving the facility without staff's knowledge. The FA #1 said when she was there all of the exit doors required a code to exit. She stated the concern with staff leaving doors unsecured was residents would be able to elope from the building without anyone knowing and it was a general safety risk. She said the facility did not allowing doors to be propped open. An interview was conducted with the facility's Owner (FO) #2 on 04/05/2024 at 11:00 AM. The FO #2 stated the concern with the unsecure door was when employees taking out the garbage or taking a break, they were leaving the door ajar. They were putting something on top of the door so the door would not close when they left, because they did not want to walk around to the front door. On 04/02/2024 at 6:00 PM, surveyor observed front door to facility propped opened with a brick. ************************* On 04/08/2024 at 4:44 PM, the facility submitted an acceptable Removal Plan for F689 which documented: 1. R#1 expressed desire to leave the facility. The facility received orders to administer Ativan but failed to provide supervision of RI #1 and to ensure all exits were secure. Therefore, R#1 was able to elope from the facility. 2. On April 6th, 2024, the F689 Removal Plan was written by Regional Consultant. 3. On April 7th, 2024, the Governing Body and QAPI committee (Director of Nursing, Medical Director via phone, Facility Owner, Dietary Manager, Social Services, Activities Director, Environmental Services/Maintenance Director, Rehabilitation Director, MDS Coordinator, Staff Development/Infection Control via phone, Unit Manager 2nd Floor, Unit Manager, 3rd Floor, Business Office Manager, Staffing Coordinator, Human Resources Director, Wound Care Coordinator, Housekeeping Supervisor) reviewed the current Elopement Policy and were educated on the following new policies by the Regional Consultant: i. The Door Safety Assessment and Review Policy, ii. The Elopement Response iii. The Elopement Response and Prevention Policy During the Governing Body and QAPI meeting, the facility discussed the elopement incident and identified a root cause of what failed to ensure the residents' safety. Upon review of the facility's current policies, the above policies were developed and implemented based on the root cause and debriefing of the incident and investigation. It was discovered the facility did not have a policy and procedure on what staff should do if a resident would voice and/or express desire to leave the facility. Further, the facility did not have a policy and procedure on what staff should do if a resident is found off campus. During the meeting, The Governing Body and QAPI committee made recommendations on doing monthly elopement drills, weekly door checks on ensuring doors are secure by the Maintenance Director, as well as daily routine checks by IDT. The facility failed to ensure the door was secure when a staff member exited the facility, thus, training on ensuring doors are secure upon exiting the facility was completed. In February 2023, following this incident, an alarm was placed on this door to alert staff when the door is not fully secure. 4. On April 7th, 2024, the Governing Body (Owner, Regional Director via phone, and Regional Consultant via phone) met and discussed the policies being implemented. 5. On June 15th, 2023, RI #1 was discharged from the facility. 6. The facility does not have anyone expressing the desire to leave the facility currently based on review of the 24-hour report along with Q-shift nurse report check offs. An assessment scoring report, consisting of residents' wander risk scores, was checked to ensure an elopement binder and appropriate interventions are in place. The facility also places residents that are identified as High Risk to Wander as well as an Elopement Risk on the 3rd floor, as room availability permits, as a preventative measure for elopement. Elopement book assessed and checked on April 6th, 2024. No discrepancies were identified. SYSTEMIC CHANGES 7. On April 6th, 2024, the following policies Door Safety Assessment and Review, the Elopement Response and Resident Elopement Prevention and Response were developed and implemented. 8. A review of door security was conducted on April 6th, 2024, by the maintenance director). The maintenance director conducted a thorough assessment of all doors in the facility to ensure they were properly secured and functioning. This included checking for any breaches or issues with door securing, as well as ensuring that no doors were propped open. No other doors during the audit were identified to be a concern. 9. On April 7th, 2024, the Door Safety Assessment and Review policy was revised to include no propping of doors. 10. On April 6th, 2024, signage was placed at all exits alerting staff and guests to use certain doors for use and to not prop open doors. One sign states Do not prop door. The other sign states Attention all staff, this is an emergency exit only. Please keep this door closed. Thank you, Knollwood Healthcare. 11. On April 7th, 2024, the Door Assessment and Review policy update includes that staff are to only use the front door for entering and exiting the facility and all other exits (doors) are for emergency use only. Signage has been placed on doors/exit that are not to be used. The Elopement Prevention and Response policy advises staff on what actions to take when a resident voices that they are going to elope. Actions to include assessment, supervision if necessary, determining the appropriate plan of care/intervention, consulting with interdisciplinary team and reviewing/updating care plan. TRAINING: 12. Education was provided to the Maintenance Director by the Regional Consultant on April 6th, 2024, regarding Door Safety Assessment and Review Policy. 13. Education was provided to the Director of Nursing regarding The Elopement Response Policy by Regional Consultant on April 6th, 2024. This policy addresses what staff should do if a resident is found off campus. 14. On April 6th, 2024, the DON trained the Designee and together they began training the IDT team and all full-time staff including, CNA's, LPN's, RN's, Therapy Dept., Housekeeping, Maintenance, and Kitchen Personnel on Door Safety Assessment and Review, Resident Elopement Prevention and Response, the Elopement Response policies. Training included resident behavior management, including the identification of at-risk residents, appropriate interventions, and the updated policies and procedures related to elopement prevention. Training was completed April 6th, 2024, through April 8th, 2024. As of April 8th, 2024, ninety of 102 employees have been educated. Staff that have not yet been educated in the above policies and procedures will not be permitted to return to work prior to education being completed. All part-time, PRN staff, and contract staff will not be permitted to work prior to education being completed. *********************************************************************** After review of the information provided in the facility's Removal Plan, in-service/education records, as well as staff interviews, and observations, the survey team determined the facility implemented the immediate corrective actions as of 04/09/2024.
CRITICAL (L) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Administration (Tag F0835)

Someone could have died · This affected most or all residents

⚠️ Facility-wide issue

Based on interviews and review of the Administrator job description, the facility's Administrator, responsible for the day-to-day operation of the facility failed to ensure the QAPI (Quality Assurance...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interviews and review of the Administrator job description, the facility's Administrator, responsible for the day-to-day operation of the facility failed to ensure the QAPI (Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement) committee met to identify all concerns using root cause analysis to ensure corrective actions needed with plans to prevent further occurrence including ongoing monitoring after Resident Identifier (RI) #1 eloped from the facility on 02/05/2023. This failure placed all 53 residents residing in the facility at risk for immediate jeopardy, as it was likely to result in serious injury, serious harm, serious impairment, or death, due to the ongoing risk of elopement. It was determined the facility's non-compliance with one or more requirements of participation had caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to residents. The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was related to State Operations Manual, Appendix PP, §483.70 Administration at a scope and severity of L. On 04/06/2024 at 12:44 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON), Owner, and Regional Consultant (via phone) were provided a copy of the Immediate Jeopardy Template and notified of the findings at the immediate jeopardy level in the area of F 835 - Administration. The IJ began on 02/05/2023 and continued until 04/09/2024. On 04/09/2024 the immediate jeopardy was removed, F835 was lowered to the lower severity of no actual harm with a potential for more than minimal harm that was not immediate jeopardy, to allow the facility time to monitor and/or revise their corrective actions as necessary to achieve substantial compliance. This deficiency was cited as a result of the investigation of complaint/report number AL00043280 and AL00046465. Findings include: Cross-Reference F689, F867, and F837. A review of the Administrator job description documented: . Lead and direct the overall operation of the facility in accordance with resident needs, government regulations and Company policies so as to maintain care for the residents while achieving the facility's business objectives . The facility policy titled Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program - Governance and Leadership revised date of March 2020 documented: Policy Statement The quality assurance and performance improvement program is overseen and implemented by the QAPI committee, which reports its findings, actions and results to the administrator and governing body. Policy Interpretation and Implementation 1. The administrator, whether a member of the QAPI committee of not, is ultimately responsible for the QAPI program, and for interpreting its results and findings to the governing body. 4. The responsibilities of the QAPI committee are to: . c. identify and help resolve negative outcomes . d. utilize root cause analysis to help identify where identified problems point to underlying systematic problems; . An interview was conducted on 04/03/2024 at 7:36 PM with the Former Administrator #1, who said that she started as the administrator in January of 2022, and held the position for over a year. She said that she served as the Abuse Coordinator and was available round the clock to address any allegations, which were reported to Alabama Department of Public Health (ADPH) and the ombudsman. When asked about RI #1 leaving the premises on 02/05/2023, she stated that she did not recall the specific incident but remembered that he/she was discovered on a nearby street and brought back to the facility. Regarding the protocol for staff encountering a resident off-site, she stated that they should remain with the resident and contact the facility for assistance. When asked if the staff member followed the protocol when RI #1 was found off-site, she said that the CNA received one on one re-education. After RI #1 arrived back to the facility a body audit was conducted, and he/she was sent to the hospital. Additionally, the incident was reported to ADPH. In response to the question about how far RI #1 had gotten off-site, she replied approximately 0.5 miles. The Former Administrator said RI #1 had exited the building through a side door that had a closing issue. When asked about the measures taken to prevent RI #1 or other residents from leaving the building, she stated that the door had been changed out. She explained that when RI #1 managed to leave the building, the door became stuck when a staff member took the trash to the dumpster. Finally, when asked if this incident was taken to Quality Assurance (QA), she said that typically all reportable incidents are presented to QAPI. She was uncertain if an emergency QAPI was conducted after the incident. On 04/05/2024 at 3:02 PM, a follow-up interview was conducted with the Former Administrator #1. During the interview, she was asked about the education provided to the staff after RI #1 eloped. She said that one on one training was conducted with CNA #11, and typically elopement training would have been conducted as well, although she was uncertain if it had taken place. According to her, the training records were usually stored in the staff members' personnel files. The FA #1 was also asked about the concern regarding leaving doors unsecured when a resident expressed a desire to leave the building. She stated that it posed a general safety risk. When questioned about why QAPI did not create an action plan after RI #1 eloped from the facility, she explained that all QAPI records were maintained on the medical records computer and no formal plan was implemented. An interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 04/06/2024 at 11:41 AM. During the interview, the DON was questioned regarding the documentation of the incident when RI #1 eloped from the facility. She stated that there was no documentation available. The DON said that the QAPI program was overseen by the Administrator, with monthly meetings scheduled. When asked about evidence of a QAPI meeting following RI #1's elopement, she said there was no evidence. Finally, when questioned about the facility's compliance with effective administration, the DON said they were not in compliance. ******************************************************************** On 04/08/2024 at 4:44 PM, the facility submitted an acceptable Removal Plan for F835 which documented: ************************************************************************* 1. After RI #1 eloped from the facility on February 5th, 2023, the Administrator failed to ensure the QAPI committee met to identify all concerns using root cause analysis to ensure corrective actions needed with plans to prevent further occurrence including ongoing monitoring. 2. Removal plan written on April 6th, 2024, by Regional Consultant 3. The new Administrator started on April 8th, 2024, and was trained by the Regional Consultant on the QAPI Policy, Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program-Governance Leadership and their responsibility of ensuring QAPI compliance and resident safety. The NHA was also trained on the new Door Safety Assessment and Review Policy, Elopement Prevention and Response, the Elopement Response Policy. The new administrator was trained on the Administrator's job responsibilities. 4. The facility has a policy and procedure on QAPI as well as the NHA's responsibility to ensure QAPI. Policy is from med pass and is titled Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program-Governance Leadership. Administrator Training completed on April 8th, 2024. *********************************************************************** The Immediate Jeopardy was removed as of 04/09/2024 and the scope and severity was lowered to no actual harm with a potential for more than minimal harm that was not immediate jeopardy, to allow the facility time to further address and monitor the deficient practice in order to achieve compliance.
CRITICAL (L) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Deficiency F0837 (Tag F0837)

Someone could have died · This affected most or all residents

⚠️ Facility-wide issue

Based on record review, interviews and the facility policy Governing Body Duties and Responsibilities, the governing body failed to provide oversight to the QAPI committee. The Governing Body failed t...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review, interviews and the facility policy Governing Body Duties and Responsibilities, the governing body failed to provide oversight to the QAPI committee. The Governing Body failed to provide guidance to the QAPI committee to use root cause analysis to determine all concerns and to make a determination of corrective actions needed with plans to prevent further occurrence after Resident Identifier (RI) #1 eloped from the facility on 02/05/2023. On 02/05/2023, RI #1 told the staff he/she wanted to leave the facility around 1:10 PM. RI #1 was given a psychotropic medication at 2:21 PM, then was not supervised. RI #1 left the facility through an unsecured door. RI #1 was seen by an off-duty staff member at approximately 3:30 PM on a busy two-lane road near the facility, but the staff member did not stay with the resident to provide supervision, and left RI #1 in unsafe environment. RI #1 was not returned to the facility until another off-duty staff member returned him/her to the facility at approximately 4:10 PM. This failure affected all 53 residents residing in the facility. It was determined the facility's non-compliance with one or more requirements of participation had caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to residents. The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was related to State Operations Manual, Appendix PP, §483.70 Administration at a scope and severity of L. On 04/06/2024 at 12:44 PM, The Owner of the company, the Corporate Consultant, and the Director of Nursing, were provided a copy of the immediate jeopardy template and notified of the immediate jeopardy finding in the area of Governing Body, F837. The IJ began on 02/05/2023 and continued until 04/09/2024. On 04/09/2024 the immediate jeopardy was removed, F837 was lowered to the lower severity of no actual harm with a potential for more than minimal harm that was not immediate jeopardy, to allow the facility time to monitor and/or revise their corrective actions as necessary to achieve substantial compliance. Further the Governing Body failed to ensure the facility had an acting Administrator from 03/29/2024 through 04/09/2024. This deficiency was cited as a result of the investigation of complaint/report number AL00043280. Cross-Reference F689, F835, and F867. Findings Include: Review of an undated facility policy titled Governing Body Duties and Responsibilities documented: Policy Statement/Purpose: The Company must have a Governing Body that assumes full legal responsibility for establishing and implementing policies regarding the management and operation of the facility. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 1. GOVERNING BODY DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES A. Policies and Procedures: The Governing Body is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies regarding the management and operation of the facility. The Governing Body, in conjunction with regular reporting by the Administrator, should assess on a regular basis that services are being provided in accordance with facility policies, that policies are current and reflect an acceptable standard of care, that care is coordinated among professional staff, and that there is effective use of resources. C. Appointment of Administrator: The Governing Body is responsible for appointing an Administrator who shall: . c. Report to and be accountable to the Governing Body. i. Facility will determine a means and schedule for regular reporting to the Governing Body and how the Governing Body will respond to the Administrator. The facility policy titled Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program - Governance and Leadership revised date of March 2020 documented: Policy Statement The quality assurance and performance improvement program is overseen and implemented by the QAPI committee, which reports its findings, actions and results to the administrator and governing body. Policy Interpretation and Implementation 1. The administrator, whether a member of the QAPI committee of not, is ultimately responsible for the QAPI program, and for interpreting its results and findings to the governing body. 2. The governing body is responsible for ensuring the QAPI program: a. is implemented . b. is sustained through transitions of leadership and staffing . On 04/05/2024 an interview was conducted with the Facility Owner #2. FO #2 said he only remembered that RI #1 had left the building either through the front or side door. FO #2 said when the staff were taking out the garbage or taking a break, they were leaving the door ajar. FO #2 said the staff were putting on top of the door so the door would not close when they left because they did not want to walk around to the front door. FO #2 did not recall if the incident was reviewed by the Quality Assurance, also called QAPI, team. FO #2 did not know how often the QAPI committee meet and said the Director of Nursing was currently responsible for the QAPI program. On 04/05/2024 at 5:33 PM an interview was conducted with the Facility Owner (FO) #1. He said that Facility Owner #2 and himself were the Governing Body. FO #1 said he did not remember the oversight he gave to Former Administrator #1 during the incident involving RI #1. He said he would have instructed to do a full investigation of what occurred, how it occurred, at the time, interview any staff and resident, that might have been around the area around that time. The facility would have reported it to the authorities. FO #1 said he did not remember all the details of the incident. He directed them to check all exit doors, do a head count, they evaluated any other concerns, changed the codes of doors, educated all staff on proper protocol and the necessity for ensuring all doors are properly closed and secured at all times. When he was asked where this information was documented he said that was a good question. He said he could not answer if there was a formal plan done; he said the facility had a nurse consultant that would have done one and there should have been a sign-in sheet. When asked what oversight was the governing body providing now since the facility did not have an Administrator. FO #1 said the duties of the governing body were to oversee the facility and the Administrator and to be involved in QAPI and administration. On 04/24/2024 at 4:22 PM an interview was conducted with the Regional Nurse Consultant (RNC). The RNC said it was important for the facility to have an Administrator so that they could oversee what was going on in the facility, oversee regulatory issues, develop monitor any care approaches with the deptartment heads, and to supervise the home and department heads. The RNC said from 03/29/2024 to 04/08/2024 the facility did not have an acting Administrator. ********************************************************** On 04/08/2024 at 4:44 PM, the facility submitted an acceptable Removal Plan for F 837 which documented: 1. RI #1 eloped from the facility on 2/5/2023, the Governing Body failed to provide oversight to the Administrator and QAPI committee and guide the committee to identify all concerns using root cause analysis to ensure corrective actions needed were in place with plans to prevent further occurrence including ongoing monitoring. 2. On April 6th, 2024, the F867 Removal Plan was written by Regional Consultant. 3. On April 7th, 2024, the Regional Consultant completed education with The Governing Body (Owner, Regional Director via phone, and Regional Consultant via phone) on their responsibility to provide oversight over the Administrator and ensuring the QAPI Program meets to identify all concerns using root cause analysis and developing corrective actions needed with plans to prevent further occurrence including ongoing monitoring. 4. On April 7th, 2024, the Governing Body met with the Director of Nursing to discuss ensuring an effective QAPI committee (Director of Nursing, Medical Director via phone, Facility Owner, Dietary Manager, Social Services, Activities Director, Environmental Services/Maintenance Director, Rehabilitation Director, MDS Coordinator, Staff Development/Infection Control via phone, Unit Manager 2nd Floor, Unit Manager, 3rd Floor, Business Office Manager, Staffing Coordinator, Human Resources Director, Wound Care Coordinator, Housekeeping Supervisor) takes place in the facility, that can function to identify all concerns with incidents, perform root cause analysis and determine corrective actions needed to prevent further incidents. 5. On April 7th, 2024, an emergency QAPI meeting was then held by the Governing Body. The Governing Body guided the QAPI committee in identifying root causes and corrective actions needing to take place for elopement prevention. 6. Root causes identified, on April 7th, 2024, were lack of staff education regarding elopement, staff failure to supervise the resident at risk, staff not ensuring all doors and exits were secure, and further, staff not ensuring resident safety if observed in an unsafe environment. 7. On April 7th, 2024, at 0900, The Governing Body met with the QAPI committee to review the new and updated policies and procedures Door Safety Assessment and Review Policy, Elopement Prevention and Response, and the Elopement Response Policy that will ensure staff is able to respond appropriately to residents at risk for elopement as well as to residents observed in an unsafe environment. 8. The facility has a policy and procedure on QAPI as well as the NHA's responsibility to ensure QAPI. Policy is from med pass and is titled Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program-Governance Leadership. Governing Body meetings are scheduled weekly every Thursday via Teams. 9. On April 8th, 2024, the Governing Body met with the new Administrator to ensure an effective QAPI committee takes place in the facility, that can function to identify all concerns with incidents, perform root cause analysis and determine corrective actions needed to prevent further incidents. The Governing Body also provided training to the new administrator on Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program-Governance Leadership and that the Governing Body meetings are scheduled weekly every Thursday via Teams. *********************************************************************** After review of the information provided in the facility's Removal Plan, in-service/education records, as well as staff interviews, and observations, the survey team determined the facility implemented the immediate corrective actions as of 04/08/2024 and the scope and severity was lowered to an F level, to allow the facility time to further address and monitor the deficient practice in order to achieve compliance.
CRITICAL (L) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

QAPI Program (Tag F0867)

Someone could have died · This affected most or all residents

⚠️ Facility-wide issue

An interview was conducted on 04-24-2024 at 11:15 AM with former adminstrator. She was asked how often QAPI meetings were held and she stated monthly. When asked who attended the QAPI meetings she sta...

Read full inspector narrative →
An interview was conducted on 04-24-2024 at 11:15 AM with former adminstrator. She was asked how often QAPI meetings were held and she stated monthly. When asked who attended the QAPI meetings she stated most department heads, the Administrator, Director of Nursing and maintenance. She stated the Medical Director came periodically but was updated every other week by phone or email .She was asked what was the most recent PIP (program improvement plan) the QAPI committee implemented. She stated she did not remember. She was asked if QAPI Plan included adverse event monitoring; she stated yes and that she was recording anything that was reported to the state including reportables, FRI's and emergency plans that were put in place to prevent episodes from happening and abuse plans. She was asked what direction was provided by the Governing Body regarding the QAPI Program and she stated she did not remember; only had two during the time she she was employed. The facility was unable to locate the records. During an interview conducted on 04-24-2024 at 3:00 PM with former administrator. she was asked how were results of the QAPI meeting communicated to the Governing Body. She stated usually by phone or in person and the local owner was usually present. When asked how the Governing Body provided oversight to the QAPI Program she stated meetings were held quarterly.When asked what actions were taken by the Governing Body to ensure QAPI Program was sustained during changes of leadership/administrators she stated she could not account for the other governing bodies. She was asked why it was important for QAPI to meet at least quarterly she stated so we can look at any trending areas that need addressing and find the root cause such as falls and other incidents. On 04-24-2024 at 4:22 PM an interview was conducted with the Regional Consultant who stated she has been a consultant since October 2023 and she does all the recruiting and oversees any regulatory issues. She further stated some situations can be taken care of via phone. When asked what her role was as Governing Body of the facility she stated she handles governing calls and any issues that may come up. When asked what actions were taken by the Governing Body to ensure QAPI Program was sustained during changes of leadership/administrators she stated previously they were doing QAPI but they were not scanning the data to shared drive. Going forward during our weekly governing body calls will be shared what is to be discussed in our QAPI meetings. She stated governing body calls are held weekly on Thursdays. During an interview with the adminstator on 04-25-2024 at 12:15 PM she was asked to provide QAPI meeting records for October, November and December 2023 and she replied there is no QAPI papers at all for October 2023, November sign in was blank and the material to be discussed for November 2023 was blank. She furthe stated the December QAPI document and the signature page was blank. When asked where the QAPI documentation that addressed the 10/11/2023 incident involving RI#3 was she stated she could not answer that. Based on record review, the facility policy Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program, and the facility's policy Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program - Analysis and Action the facility's QAPI committee failed to thoroughly review all factors related to Resident Identifier (RI) #1's elopement on 02/05/2023. The facility further failed to develop and implement effective plans and interventions to prevent recurrence and ensure the facility was secured. On 02/05/2023 RI #1 exited the facility through an unsecured side door without staff's knowledge. RI #1 was further left by staff unsupervised in an unsafe area 2,640 feet from the facility. The failure of the QAPI committee to thoroughly review all factors and implement effective interventions following an adverse event had the potential to affect all 53 residents. It was determined the facility's non-compliance with one or more requirements of participation had caused, or was likely to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to residents. The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was related to State Operations Manual, Appendix PP, §483.75 Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement at a scope and severity of L. On 04/06/2024 at 12:44 PM, The Facility's Owner, the Corporate Consultant, and the Director of Nursing, were provided a copy of the immediate jeopardy template and notified of the immediate jeopardy finding in the area of Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI), F867-QAPI/Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA). The IJ began on 02/05/2023 and continued until 04/09/2024. On 04/09/2024 the immediate jeopardy was removed, F 867 was lowered to the lower severity of no actual harm with a potential for more than minimal harm that was not immediate jeopardy, to allow the facility time to monitor and/or revise their corrective actions as necessary to achieve substantial compliance. This deficiency was cited as a result of the investigation of complaint/report number AL00043280. Findings Include: Cross-Reference F689, F835, and F837. A review of a facility policy Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program, with a revised date of February 2020 documented Policy Statement This facility shall develop, implement, and maintain an ongoing, facility wide data driven QAPI program that is focused on indicators of the outcomes of care and quality of life for our residents. Authority 1. The owner and/or governing board (body) of our facility is ultimately responsible for the QAPI program A review of the facility policy titled Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program - Analysis and Action dated March 2020 documented: .Policy Interpretation and Implementation 1. The QAPI Program, overseen by the QAPI Committee is designed to identify and address quality deficiencies through analysis of the underlying cause and actions targeted at correcting systems at a comprehensive level. 2. The methodology for analysis and action is guided by a written QAPI plan that includes: a. definition of the problem, based on information obtained through data, self-assessments, and feedback systems. b. an analysis of the root cause of the problem from a systems perspective. c. establishing measurable goals and benchmarks for improvement. d. specific interventions aimed at correcting the problem and achieving the stated goals or benchmarks. e. methods and frequency of monitoring performance improvement objectives. 3. The QAPI committee is responsible for analyzing identified problems, establishing corrective actions, measuring progress against the established goals and benchmarks, communicating information to staff, residents, and reporting findings to the administrator and governing board . On 04/06/2024 at 11:41 the Director of Nursing said she could not find QAPI minutes from the incident of elopement that occurred on 02/05/2023. On 04/03/2024 at 7:36 PM during a phone interview with the Former Administrator, she said she did not recall much about the incident of RI #1 leaving the facility he/she was found and returned. She said staff should stay with the resident and call the facility for help if they will not come back with them. She said RI #1 left the building through a side door that had an issue with closing. She said she was not sure what was done when RI #1 expressed wanting to leave the building. The former Administrator said she did not know if there was an emergency QAPI meeting. On 04/06/2024 at 11:41 AM, during an interview with the Director of Nursing, she said there was no evidence of what was done after RI #1 eloped from the facility. She said she had been employed at that facility since January 2024. The DON said the concern of not having evidence of what was done after RI #1 eloped from the facility was the facility could not justify what was done or that staff were provided training and education. The DON said that after RI #1 eloped from the facility, the facility should have conducted proper notification, investigation, in-services, monitoring of the resident, identified the root cause of the incident, and ensured safety measures were implemented after the incident. The DON said the Administrator was over the QA/QAPI program and meetings were supposed to be held monthly. She said the QAPI team was the Administrator, DON, Social Services, MDS, Activities, basically key personal and the Medical Director. ********************************************************************************************************** On 04/08/2024 at 4:44 PM, the facility submitted an acceptable Removal Plan for F867 which documented: 1. The QAPI committee failed to develop and implement effective interventions including ongoing monitoring to prevent recurrence after the facility failed to prevent RI #1 from leaving the facility on 02/05/2023 unsupervised, through an unsecure side door exiting to the outside of the building. RI #1 was further left by staff unsupervised in an unsafe area 2640 feet from the facility crossing a two-lane road with oncoming traffic. 2. On April 6th, 2024, the F867 Removal plan was written by Regional Consultant. 3. On April 7th, 2024, the Governing Body (Owner, Regional Director, and Regional Consultant) met with the Director of Nursing to discuss ensuring an effective QAPI committee takes place in the facility, that can function to identify all concerns with incidents, perform root cause analysis and determine corrective actions needed to prevent further incidents. An emergency QAPI meeting was then held by the Governing Body. The Governing Body guided the QAPI committee in identifying root causes and corrective actions needing to take place for elopement prevention. 4. On April 7th, 2024, the Regional Consultant provided training to the QAPI committee (Director of Nursing, Medical Director via phone, Facility Owner, Dietary Manager, Social Services, Activities Director, Environmental Services/Maintenance Director, Rehabilitation Director, MDS Coordinator, Staff Development/Infection Control via phone, Unit Manager 2nd Floor, Unit Manager, 3rd Floor, Business Office Manager, Staffing Coordinator, Human Resources Director, Wound Care Coordinator, Housekeeping Supervisor) during an emergency QAPI meeting to ensure an effective QAPI committee takes place in the facility, that can function to identify all concerns with incidents, perform root cause analysis and determine corrective actions needed to prevent further incidents. The QAPI Committee was trained on the facility's QAPI Policy Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program-Governance Leadership. 5. On April 7th, 2024, root causes identified were lack of staff education regarding elopement, staff failure to supervise the resident at risk, staff not ensuring all doors and exits were secure, and further, staff not ensuring resident safety if observed in an unsafe environment. 6. On April 7th, 2024, the QAPI committee reviewed the new and updated policies and procedures The Door Safety Assessment and Review, Elopement Prevention and Response, and Elopement Response policies to ensure staff are able to respond appropriately to residents at risk for elopement as well as to residents observed in an unsafe environment. 7. On April 7th, 2024, the Door Safety Assessment and Review, Elopement Prevention and Response, and Elopement Response policies were developed and implemented to ensure staff respond appropriately to residents at risk for elopement as well as residents observed in an unsafe environment. ********************************************************************** The Immediate Jeopardy was removed as of 04/09/2024 and the scope and severity was lowered to an F level, to allow the facility time to further address and monitor the deficient practice in order to achieve compliance.
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Free from Abuse/Neglect (Tag F0600)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, record review, review of a facility policy titled GHC Abuse Policy, review of the Facility Reported Inciden...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, record review, review of a facility policy titled GHC Abuse Policy, review of the Facility Reported Incident(FRI) received by the Alabama State Survey Agency, and review of the facility's investigative file, the facility failed to protect the Resident Identifier (RI) #3's right to be free from verbal abuse by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #16 and CNA #17. On 10/11/2023, at approximately 4:27 PM, RI #3's daughter was visiting and requested assistance from staff. RI #3's daughter left her cellphone on record in the room as CNA #16 and CNA #17 entered the room to provide care. After CNA #16 and CNA #17 finished providing care, the daughter returned to the room and stopped the recording. RI #3's daughter listened to the recording and heard both CNA's making multiple derogatory statements and threats of punishment toward RI #3. The daughter heard swearing and noises that sounded like the resident was being hit. RI #3's daughter stated she was so upset that she left the facility without reporting it to anyone. At approximately 5:40 PM RI #3's daughter returned to the facility and reported the incident to the Infection Control Nurse (ICN), Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #8. These deficient practices affected RI #3. This deficiency was cited as a result of the investigation of complaint/report number AL00045846 The survey team applied the Reasonable Person Concept in determining the psychosocial outcome related to the deficient practice. Findings include: The facility's policy titled GHC Abuse Policy dated 08/2022 revealed: Our residents have the right to be free from abuse . Policy Interpretation and Implementation Definitions To help with recognition of abuse, the following definitions of abuse are provided: 1. Abuse is defined as the willful infliction of injury . intimidation or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish . 2. Verbal Abuse is defined as any use of oral, written, or gestured language that willfully includes disparaging and derogatory terms to residents or their families, or within their hearing distance, to describe residents, regardless of their age, ability to comprehend or disability. 5. Mental abuse is defined as, but not limited to, humiliation, harassment, threats of punishment, or withholding of treatment or services . Prevention . 11. Monitoring staff on all shifts to identify inappropriate behavior towards residents (e.g. using derogatory language, rough handling of residents .) . Response . 1. Our facility does not condone resident abuse by anyone including staff members . RI #3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of Hemiplegia following Cerebral Infarction, Acute Respiratory Failure, and Vascular Dementia. RI #3's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 10/09/2023, indicated RI #3's Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) was 00, which indicated the resident was cognitively impaired. Section E of the MDS indicated RI #3 did not have any behaviors directed toward others. The Alabama Department of Public Health Online Incident Reporting System form, dated 10/11/2023, documented that CNA #16 and CNA #17 were in RI #3's room to provide care. RI #3's daughter recorded the conversation of the CNA's after she left the room. Both CNA's could be heard verbally abusing the resident. RI #3's daughter provided a copy of the recording on 04/25/2024 at 3:00 PM from RI #3's daughter, and the playback of the recording revealed: Voice one asking someone to step out so they could perform care on resident. Voice one said, .You got everything (CNA #17's name)? Voice two said, I was coming in here to change (his/her) shirt. Voice one said, (He/She) wants to show out. Voice two said, I don't want to do this shit. Voice one said, You know you don't want to do that, so don't even play like that. Voice two said, (He/She) done wet the bed .like what the fuck. Voice one said, He/She already know, he/she already know. Voice one screamed, Put your leg back in the bed! Voice one said, Can you put your leg back in the bed? .uh huh, now you want somebody to help . play with me, play with me, play with me, play with me, play with me. I want you to do it. I'm gonna call the police. You want me to call the police? . You want this brief off or not? . You done soaked this fucking bed up . play with me . crazy ass . crazy ass . you crazy . I'm crazy too . you can't even help yourself! . I don't play with (his/her) ass . I don't care . I don't play with (his/her) ass . they better give (him/her) (his/her) medicine or something . lay back so I can put this on you bruh. You can't do nothing for yourself and come up here act a fucking fool. Don't grab me, bruh don't grab me, grab me one more time, do it again! (laughter) . Voice two said, Just flip (his/her) ass over . come here motherfucker .bitch . motherfucker . Voice one said, Can't do nothing for yourself, come on, uh huh, uh huh, uh huh, what you do, uh huh try it . police gonna kick (his/her) ass . that's why they gonna beat (his/her) ass in jail. Resident's voice said, It's all wrong. Voice one said, It's all wrong. Voice two said, Look at this shit . it's the last time I'm coming in here today. Voice two said, Turn (his/her) ass over . fuck you . Voice two said, Let's just sell him/her to sex traffickers . crazy ass. Voice one said, I'm gonna call the police . done scratched my motherfucking hand up, I'm fixing to report your ass. Voice two said, Your the lying king, lying. Voice one said, Fuck (him/her), (he/she) don't mean shit . (he/she) scratched the fuck out of me . (he/she) don't want the shirt on fuck it . The facility's Investigative Summary dated 10/13/2023 and signed by Former Administrator (FA) #2, documented, . (RI #3) . who resides in (named room) at (name of facility) is A&O x2, has limited speech and has a BIMS of 0 . is being seen by . hospice . (RI #3's daughter) requested assistance from (CNA #17) to provide care to . (RI #3). (RI #3's daughter's) cellphone was left in the room and on record while (CNA #17) and another CNA (CNA #16) were in the room providing care to the resident. When (CNA #17) and (CNA #16) were finished with providing care, (RI #3's daughter) returned to the room and turned on the recording . heard both (CNA #17) and (CNA #16) making derogatory comments toward resident. Threatening comments were made and . noises that sounded like resident being hit. (RI #3's daughter) played the recording to this writer (FA #2). Most of the recording was audible and based on what was said by (CNA #16) and (CNA #17) it was substantiated that the resident was verbally and mentally abused by both (CNA #16 and CNA #17). This writer heard what sounded like slaps; someone hitting another person and heard one of the CNAs say, Don't hit him bitch . turn over after this it sounded as though someone was hit. The resident could be heard telling the CNA(s) . get away from me, to which one of the CNA's responded, Fuck you, I'm going to call the police and have you arrested. (He/She) done scratched my damn hand. Fuck it. Today (10/13/2023) the resident was found to have swelling in his right hand . This writer cannot say if the swelling was due to the incident with the CNA's though the swelling was not noted before the incident. Other comments made to the resident included the CNA's yelling at resident telling (him/her) to put his/her leg back in the bed. Don't play with me. (He/She) already know. (He/She) just wants to show out. I'm going to call the police. Where you tryin' to go? Want me to call the police? Ain't nobody going to play with you, Acting a fucking fool. I'm about to punch the fuck out of (him/her). I'll kill your ass; bitch mother fucker . (CNA #16) and (CNA #17) were interviewed . They denied the allegations. (CNA #16) admitted hearing (CNA #17 curse the resident . (CNA #17) denied the allegation, but state the resident called her a bitch, so she said called (him/her) a bitch back. During an interview on 04/04/2024 at 9:22 AM, Infection Control Nurse, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #8 stated she was working a double shift on 10/11/2023, and a family member brought a recording that was on her phone of CNA #16 and CNA #17 providing care for their family member and being verbally abusive. LPN #8 stated that she listened to about thirty seconds of the recording, and it was so bad she stopped listening to the recording. She stated that she immediately reported the abuse to the Administrator (Former Administrator #2). On 04/04/2024 at 1:40 PM and interview was conducted with FA #2. The FA #2 said the family member recorded the CNAs changing RI #3. The FA #2 said CNA #17 was cursing and inappropriate. FA #2 said the other CNA was being aggressive. She said she substantiated the allegation by listening to the recording. On 04/25/2024 at 9:22 AM an interview was conducted with RI #3's daughter. RI #3's daughter stated it would have made RI #3 very upset and angry if he/she had not did not have decreased cognition because it was very disrespectful. An interview was conducted on 04/25/2024 at 11:20 AM with the Administrator. The Administrator said it could cause psychological or emotional distress to a reasonable person in a similar situation as the incident on 10/11/2023 involving RI #3 and CNA #16 and CNA #17. The Administrator said if there was cursing at resident it would be considered verbal abuse. An interview was conducted on 04/25/2024 at 11:35 AM with Social Services Director (SSD) in reference to 10/11/2023 incident. The SSD said a reasonable person in a similar would probably be afraid of any CNA that would take care of them. The SSD said that situation was verbal abuse. A follow-up interview was conducted with RI #3's daughter on 04/25/2024 at 3:00 PM. RI #3's daughter stated she heard the recording and that they talked very mean and ugly to him/her. RI #3's daughter stated she visited RI #3 one day prior to the incident and RI #3 told her that staff did not treat him/her right so she left her phone on record while staff provided care on 10/11/2023. On 04/24/2024 at 3:15 PM CNA #17 was called via telephone. The number was no longer in-service. On 04/24/2024 at 3:20 PM CNA #16 was contacted via telephone. A male answered and hung up when the surveyor requested to speak with CNA #16.
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Abuse Prevention Policies (Tag F0607)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, resident record review, review of a facility policy titled, Resident-to-Resident Altercations, review of a ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, resident record review, review of a facility policy titled, Resident-to-Resident Altercations, review of a Facility Reported Incident (FRI) received by the State Agency, and review of the facility's investigative file, the facility failed to ensure the abuse policy was implemented to take steps to protect Resident Identifier (RI) #2 from further abuse on 05/15/2024 when RI #2 was being physically abused by RI #1. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #3 heard RI #2 yelling and saw RI #1 sitting on RI #2's arm and slapping RI #2 in the face. Instead of providing immediate protection and supervision for the residents, CNA #3 left the room, leaving RI #1 alone in the room with RI #2, who according to interview may have been afraid or in pain, while the CNA went to the nurses' station to get the nurse. This deficient practice affected RI #2, one of six sampled residents. This deficiency was cited as a result of the investigation of complaint/report number AL00047877. Findings include: On 05/15/2024 the State Agency received an Online Incident Report alleging a witness, CNA #3 heard RI #2 howling, saw RI #1 in RI #2's room sitting on and slapping RI #2. CNA #3 ran and got the nurse, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #4, who was able to separate the residents. A facility policy titled Abuse Policy, updated 08/2022, documented: Our residents have the right to be free from abuse . Protection . The facility protects individuals from abuse during investigation of any allegations of abuse. 3. Steps will be taken to prevent further potential abuse, and should include: . Potential increased supervision . Review of a facility policy titled, Resident-to-Resident Altercations, with a revised date of 12/2007, revealed the following: . Policy Interpretation and implementation . 2. If two residents are involved in an altercation, staff will: a. Separate the residents, and institute measures to calm the situation . RI #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. RI #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The facility's investigative file was reviewed and a handwritten Witness Statement dated 05/15/2024, signed by CNA #3 documented: . Time of Incident: 4:30 (4:30 PM) . I was coming down the hall I heard (RI #2) howlling (howling) when i went in the room (RI #1) was sitting on (RI #2) and slapping (RI #2) and i was begging (RI #1) to get off of (RI #2) . (RI #1) started fighting me and i ran and got the nurse and she got (RI #1) out of there . On 06/15/2024 at 11:51 AM, a telephone interview was conducted with CNA #3 and she was asked why she left RI #2 in the room with RI #1. CNA #3 said RI #1 was fighting her so she ran out of the room to get help. CNA #3 said after the incident she was told she could have used the call light to get help. CNA #3 said RI #1 was not protected from further potential abuse when she left RI #1 in the room with RI #2. CNA #3 said when she witnessed the altercation between RI #1 and RI #2, she should have separated them immediately. CNA #3 said after the incident occurred she was told by the DON (Director of Nursing) that she should have never left RI #2 in the room alone with RI #1. When asked how she thought RI #2 was feeling based on a reasonable person's response to what she had witnessed, CNA #3 answered, like RI #2 was in pain and felt bad and RI #2 was probably scared. On 06/13/2024 at 5:28 PM, an interview was conducted with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #4 and she said, she was at the nurses station when the CNA came to tell her RI #1 was hitting RI #2. LPN #4 said, when the CNA witnessed the incident between RI #2 and RI #1, she should have stayed in the room and yelled for someone to come to the room so RI #2 would not have been in harms way. LPN #4 said, when RI #1 was left alone in the room with RI #2, RI #2 was not protected from further potential abuse by RI #1, and it took her about ten seconds to get to the room after she was informed. On 06/15/2024 at 4:05 PM, a telephone interview was conducted with the DON. The DON said, when the CNA witnessed RI #1 hitting RI #2, she should have stayed with RI #2 to keep RI #2 safe. The DON said, the CNA told her she went to get the nurse when she witnessed the incident. The DON said, RI #2 was not protected when he/she was left alone in the room with RI #1. On 06/14/2024 at 12:05 PM, an interview was conducted with the Social Service Designee (SSD). The SSD said when the CNA left RI #2 in the room with RI #1, RI #2 was not protected from further potential abuse by RI #1. The SSD said, when the CNA observed RI #1 hitting RI #2, the CNA should have made sure both residents were separated and ensured their safety before she left the room. The SSD said, the facility's policy says to protect the victim/resident, you must separate them immediately. On 06/14/2024 at 5:06 PM, an interview was conducted with the Administrator (ADM). The ADM said, when RI #1 was left in the room alone with RI #2, RI #2 was not adequately protected. The ADM said, the facility's policy says the resident was to be protected, and should be separated immediately to ensure safety of the resident. The ADM said the CNA could have removed either resident from the scene of the incident.
SERIOUS (G) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Deficiency F0692 (Tag F0692)

A resident was harmed · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews, medical record review, the facility's Spring/Summer 2024 Menu, the facility's standardized rec...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews, medical record review, the facility's Spring/Summer 2024 Menu, the facility's standardized recipe for Chili - 4042, and the facility policies for Weight Assessment and Intervention, Menus, and Standardized Recipes the facility failed to ensure (RI) Resident Identifier #35 received appropriate food portions as defined by the Registered Dietitian's (RD) approved menu for Puree diets and did not suffer significant weight loss of 10.7 % (percent) over 180 days. RI #35 lost 21 pounds from 01/02/2024 to 07/09/2024. The deficient practice caused actual harm that was not immediate jeopardy to RI #35, one of six residents who received Puree diets. This deficient practice was cited as a result of the investigation of complaint/ report #AL00048377. Cross-Reference F 803. Findings Include: The facility's policy titled, Weight Assessment and Intervention, with a revised date of February 2021, documented the following: Policy Statement The multidisciplinary team will strive to prevent, monitor, and intervene for undesirable weight loss for our residents. Policy Interpretation and Implementation Weight Assessment . 3. Any weight change of 5% or more since the last weight assessment will be addressed by the dietitian. 4. The Dietitian will review the resident weight record to follow individual weight trends over time. Negative trends will be evaluated by the Interdisciplinary team whether or not the criteria for significant weight change has been met. 5. The threshold for significant unplanned and undesired weight loss will be based on the following criteria . c. 6 months - 10% weight loss weight loss is significant; greater than 10% is severe. Analysis 1. Assessment information shall analyzed by the multidisciplinary team and conclusions shall be made regarding the: a. Resident's target weight range (including rationale if different from ideal body weight); b. Approximate calorie, protein, and other nutrient needs compared with the resident's current intake; c. The relationship between medical condition or clinical situation and weight; and d. Whether and to what extent weight stabilization or improvement can be anticipated. 2. The Physician and the multidisciplinary team will identify conditions and medications that may be causing anorexia, weight loss, or increasing the risk of weight loss. The undated facility policy for Menus in the Dietary Service General Policies included the following: . All Menus shall be approved by the dietitian. Menus shall . indicate standard portions at each meal. The undated facility policy for Standardized Recipes in the Dietary Service General Policies included the following: . Standardized recipes, adjusted to appropriate yield, are used in the preparation of foods. The facility's standardized recipe for Chili - 4042, dated 04/14/2015, which included ground beef and red pinto beans, listed the following: . Serving size: 6 oz. ladle or #5 (number five) scoop . RI #35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses that included Dysphagia Oropharyngeal Phase, Unspecified Protein-Calorie Malnutrition, and Adult Failure to Thrive. RI #35's care plan for weight loss, initiated 03/01/2019, documented the following: . Potential for weight loss and dehydration due to lack of teeth and dentures/requiring a mechanically altered diet. Dependent on staff for food/fluid intake. Intellectual disability: unable to communicate needs and preferences. History of Failure to Thrive . Goal . No significant weight loss through next review . Approaches . ENSURE PLUS 3X'S (three times) A DAY . Provide diet as ordered. RI #35's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 05/21/2024, documented in section K0300 that the resident had not had significant weight loss and section K0520 documented the resident was on a mechanical diet. RI #35's Meal Intake records from Breakfast on 06/08/2024 through Breakfast on 07/25/2024 indicated a value of 3 (meaning 76 % to 100 % of the meal was consumed) for 128 meals and a value of 2 (meaning 51 % to 75 % of the meal was consumed) for ten meals. RI #35's Weights and Vitals Summary documented the resident weighed 197 lbs. (pounds) on 01/02/2024 and 176 lbs. on 07/06/2024. RI #35 lost 21 pounds and had a 10.7 percent weight loss over 180 days. RI #35's Progress Notes *NEW* documented the following: . 07/11/2024 . Note: July Monthly wt.(weight) reported down to 176# (pounds), loss of 10.7% (percent) or 21# from January. Recommend weekly wts. for now and increase Ensure Plus to TID (three times daily). (name of Registered Dietitian) Dietary - Registered Dietician (Dietitian) . RI #35's July 2024 Order Summary Report, dated July 25, 2024, documented the following: . Regular Diet Pureed texture, Regular consistency, for diet . Order Date 02/17/2020 . Ensure Plus three times a day . Order Date 07/11/2024 . Monthly weight every day shift starting on the 1st and ending on the 1st every month . Order Date 11/22/2023 . Weekly weights x (times) 4 (four) weeks every day shift every Mon (Monday) . Order Date 7/11/2024 . RI #35's July 2024 Medication Administration Record (MAR) documented RI #35 received his/her Ensure Plus supplement twice daily from 07/01/2024 to 07/10/2024 and then three times daily beginning 07/11/2024 through 07/24/2024. The facility's Spring/Summer 2024 Menu for Week 2, Sunday through Saturday provided by the facility on 07/22/2024, did not include portion sizes or diet texture/therapeutic diet extensions. On 07/23/2024 at 11:15 AM, three Dietary staff were observed preparing lunch trays for the residents. The AM [NAME] was serving the hot food from the steamtable. Upon being asked how the puree bread was being served, the AM [NAME] said the residents with Puree diets only got meat, vegetable, and starch on the plate. When asked if any bread was added to the puree meat, the AM cook said, no. A Puree diet plate prepared at 12:13 PM for dining room service was observed to include puree meat (ham) with gravy, puree vegetable (green beans), and mashed potatoes with gravy. No puree bread was present on either the plate or the tray served. At 12:20 PM on 07/23/2024, the serving utensils used for portioning lunch were observed with the AM Cook. A #10 (3 ounces or 3/8 cup) scoop was used to serve the Puree [NAME] Beans. The menu used for lunch was checked with the AM Cook. The Tuesday, Daily Menu for Week 2 was posted in the food production area and included the following: Ham Steak Mashed Potatoes Green Beans Dinner Roll Cake/Icing The Week 2 Sunday through Saturday menu was missing, but the Sunday through Saturday menus for Week 1, Week 3, and Week 4 were present on the table. None of these menus included portion sizes or diet texture/therapeutic diet extensions. The AM [NAME] said there were no other menus with portion sizes. At 12:35 PM on 07/23/2024, a portion conversion chart was observed in the kitchen's food production area on the wall above the table with the menus and to the left of the handwashing sink. The chart was plastic coated and approximately 24 inches by 18 inches in size. The portion conversion chart revealed the following: A #8 scoop equals 4 ounces or 1/2 cup measure. A #10 scoop equals 3 ounces or 3/8 cup measure. A #16 scoop equals 2 ounces or 1/4 cup measure. On 07/23/2024 at 1:30 PM, the Administrator was asked for a copy of the extended menus, to include the texture modified and therapeutic diets along with portion sizes. The facility's Spring/Summer 2024 Menu for Week 2, Tuesday, Lunch on 07/23/2024, provided by the facility on 07/23/2024 after lunch, included the following: Puree texture diet - . 4 oz Pur (Puree) [NAME] Beans . 2 oz Pur Dinner Roll . On 07/23/2024 at 3:40 PM, the Dietary Manager said the extended menus were kept in the kitchen in a folder on the table next to the handwashing sink (food production area). The Dietary Manager said she did not know why the cook would not know where the extended menus were located. The Dietary Manager showed two spots where the folder with the extended menus might be kept in the food production area, but they were not there earlier. The extended menus for each week were now shown to be behind the Sunday through Saturday menus for Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, and Week 4; with each week in a plastic sleeve, for a total of four plastic sleeves. The facility's Spring/Summer 2024 Menu for Week 2, Wednesday, Lunch on 07/24/2024 included the following: Puree texture diet - . 2 oz Pur (puree) Bread Sticks . On 07/24/2024 at 11:10 AM, the tray line was set up for Lunch. The AM [NAME] was asked if she had seen the extended menu. The AM [NAME] said yes and got the menus. When asked if she had seen these extended menus before today; the AM [NAME] said she had seen this type of menu in other facilities, but not at this facility. No puree bread was prepared to be served on the tray line for the lunch service. The facility's Spring/Summer 2024 Menu for Week 2, Wednesday, Supper on 07/24/2024 included the following: Regular texture diet - . 6 oz Beef Chili w/ (with) Beans . Mechanical Soft texture diet - . 6 oz Beef Chili w/ Beans . Puree texture diet - . 3 oz Pur Beef Chili w/ Beans . 4 oz Pur Peas & (and) Carrots . 2 oz Pur Bread . On 07/24/2024 at 4:43 PM, the Supper tray line was ongoing with the PM [NAME] serving from the steamtable. The serving utensils being used for portioning Supper included the following: A 3-ounce spoodle (spoon-ladle) was used to serve the Puree Beef Chili w/ Beans. A 3-ounce spoodle was used to serve the Puree Peas & Carrots. There was no puree bread on the tray line for the supper service. On 07/24/2024 at 5:20 PM, the PM [NAME] was interviewed. When asked how she knew what to serve for Supper; the PM [NAME] went to the food production area and explained that she looked at the menu to determine what to prepare, indicating the Sunday through Saturday menu for Week 2 and the Daily Menu for Wednesday. Upon being asked how she knew the amount to serve; the PM [NAME] said she did not know, as there was nothing on the menus to indicate appropriate portion sizes. The PM [NAME] was shown the seven days of extended menus now in the plastic sleeve behind the Sunday through Saturday menu. The PM [NAME] said she had not seen these extended menus before. The PM [NAME] also said she had not served bread to the residents with Puree diets. During a meal observation on 07/24/2024 at 5:16 PM, staff was assisted RI #35 up in bed. RI #35 was nonverbal but responded to call of his/her name. RI #35 fed himself/herself from the Supper tray with his/her left hand, not using the right hand/arm. RI #35 was observed independently eating puree beef chili with beans, puree peas & carrots, puree potatoes, pudding, iced tea, and water. There was no puree bread. RI #35 ate well. At 5:23 PM, the resident was still eating with almost 100% consumed. Staff then assisted RI #35 at the end of his/her meal. At 5:31 PM, CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) #12 picked up RI #35's meal tray. When asked how much the resident consumed, CNA #12 said 100 percent. CNA #12 further said RI #35 always ate 100 percent. CNA #12 said RI #35 meal ticket on the tray said RI #35 was to recieve a puree diet, sweet tea, and water. On 07/24/2024 at 5:30 PM, the Dietary Manager was asked why it was important for the cooks to know the food portion to serve the residents. The Dietary Manager said it was important for the residents to receive a regular portion meal. On 07/25/2024 at 3:10 PM, the Registered Dietitian (RD) was interviewed. When asked the concern if residents were served portions less than those listed on the menu or if food items were omitted; the RD said then the residents were not getting enough food and the concerns would be weight loss, possible skin breakdown, and dehydration. Upon being asked the concern if a resident did not receive the nutritional values as approved by the RD for a Regular Puree Diet, the RD said potential for weight loss. The RD further said the facility should have been serving the portions residents were supposed to get. When asked about RI #35, the RD said the resident had weight loss over six months and it was now significant weight loss. The RD further said approaches were put in to address the weight loss; but, if not enough food was being served, the facility needed to in-service dietary staff on proper portion size and to give the staff the serving tools they need. In a follow-up call to the RD on 07/26/2024 at 12:08 PM, the RD agreed the menu for Week 2, Wednesday Supper meal was incorrect based on the Chili - 4042 recipe and that the Puree diets should receive a 6-ounce portion of pureed Beef Chili w/ Beans. The RD further said she would need to look at all the menu extensions for texture modified/therapeutic diets to make sure they were correct.
SERIOUS (I) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Actual Harm - a resident was hurt due to facility failures

Menu Adequacy (Tag F0803)

A resident was harmed · This affected most or all residents

⚠️ Facility-wide issue

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, medical record review, the facility's Spring/Summer 2024 Menu, the facility's standardized reci...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, medical record review, the facility's Spring/Summer 2024 Menu, the facility's standardized recipe for Chili - 4042, and the facility's policies for Menus, and Standardized Recipes the facility failed to ensure portion sizes listed on the menu for 07/23/2024 and 07/24/2024 were provided to residents, the portion of Sliced Ham Steak served on 07/23/2024 was at least three ounces (oz.), the portion to be served as listed on the Chili recipe was reflected on the menu for the Puree diet for 07/24/2024, and puree bread was provided to the Puree diets as listed on the menu for 07/23/2024 and 07/24/2024. This had the potential to affect 52 of 52 residents receiving meals from the kitchen including Resident Identifier (RI) #35 one of six residents receiving Puree diets. The deficient practice caused actual harm that was not immediate jeopardy to RI #35. RI #35 had significant weight loss of 10.7% (percent) over a six-month period from 01/02/2024 through 07/06/2024. This deficient practice was cited as a result of the investigation of complaint/ report #AL00048377. Cross Reference F 692. Findings include: The undated facility policy for Menus in the Dietary Service General Policies included the following: . Menus shall provide a variety of foods and indicate standard portions at each meal. All Menus shall be approved by the dietitian. The undated facility policy for Standardized Recipes in the Dietary Service General Policies included the following: . Standardized recipes, adjusted to appropriate yield, are used in the preparation of foods. The facility's standardized recipe for Chili - 4042, dated 04/14/2015, which included ground beef and red pinto beans, listed the following: . Serving size: 6 oz. ladle or #5 (number 5) scoop . The facility's Spring/Summer 2024 Menu for Week 2, Sunday through Saturday included the following for Tuesday Lunch: Ham Steak Mashed Potatoes Green Beans Dinner Roll Cake/Icing Milk, 2% Coffee/Tea This menu, provided by the facility on 07/22/2024, did not include portion sizes or diet texture/therapeutic diet extensions. On 07/23/2024 at 11:15 AM, three Dietary staff were observed preparing lunch trays for the residents. The AM [NAME] was serving the hot food from the steamtable. At 11:45 AM, the Dietary staff were asked if the Dietary Manager was present in the building. The Dietary staff all shook their heads negatively and the AM [NAME] said, No. When asked the number of Puree diets being served, the AM [NAME] said six. Upon being asked how the puree bread was being served, the AM [NAME] said the Puree diets only got meat, vegetable, and starch on the plate. When asked if any bread was added to the puree meat, the AM cook said, no. A Puree diet plate prepared at 12:13 PM for dining room service was observed to include puree meat (ham) with gravy, puree vegetable (green beans), and mashed potatoes with gravy. No puree bread was present on either the plate or the tray served. At 12:20 PM on 07/23/2024, the serving utensils used for portioning lunch were observed with the AM [NAME] and included the following: A 3-ounce spoodle (spoon-ladle) was used to serve the [NAME] Beans. A #10 scoop was used to serve the Puree [NAME] Beans. When asked about the portion size of the sliced Ham, the AM [NAME] said it was supposed to be three ounces. Upon being asked if there was a food scale to verify the portion size of the Ham, the AM [NAME] said there was no food scale available. The menu used for lunch was checked with the AM Cook. The Tuesday, Daily Menu for Week 2 was posted in the food production area and included the following: Ham Steak Mashed Potatoes Green Beans Dinner Roll Cake/Icing The Week 2 Sunday through Saturday menu was missing, but the Sunday through Saturday menus for Week 1, Week 3, and Week 4 were present on the table. None of these menus included portion sizes or diet texture/therapeutic diet extensions. The AM [NAME] said there were no other menus with portion sizes. At 12:35 PM on 07/23/2024, a portion conversion chart was observed in the kitchen's food production area on the wall above the table with the menus and to the left of the handwashing sink. The chart was plastic coated and approximately 24 inches by 18 inches in size. The portion conversion chart revealed the following: A #8 scoop equals 4 ounces or 1/2 cup measure. A #10 scoop equals 3 ounces or 3/8 cup measure. A #16 scoop equals 2 ounces or 1/4 cup measure. On 07/23/2024 at 1:30 PM, the Administrator was asked for a copy of the extended menus, to include the texture modified and therapeutic diets along with portion sizes. The facility's Spring/Summer 2024 Menu for Week 2, Tuesday, Lunch on 07/23/2024, provided by the facility on 07/23/2024 after lunch, included the following: Regular texture diet - . 3 oz Ham Steak . 4 oz [NAME] Beans . Mechanical Soft texture diet - . 4 oz [NAME] Beans . Puree texture diet - . 4 oz Pur (Puree) [NAME] Beans . 2 oz Pur Dinner Roll . On 07/23/2024 at 3:40 PM, the Dietary Manager said the extended menus were kept in the kitchen in a folder on the table next to the handwashing sink (food production area). The Dietary Manager said she did not know why the cook would not know where the extended menus were located. When asked if there was a scale in the kitchen to weigh meat portions, the Dietary manager said yes. At 4:40 PM, the Dietary Manager looked throughout the kitchen for the portion scale but could not find it. The Dietary Manager asked two Dietary staff where the portion scale was, but neither of the employees remembered seeing the scale. The Dietary Manager showed two spots where the folder with the extended menus might be kept in the food production area, but they were not there earlier. The extended menus for each week were now shown to be behind the Sunday through Saturday menus for Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, and Week 4; with each week in a plastic sleeve, for a total of four plastic sleeves. The facility's Spring/Summer 2024 Menu for Week 2, Wednesday, Lunch on 07/24/2024 included the following: Regular texture diet - . 4 oz Italian Vegetables . Mechanical Soft texture diet - . 4 oz Italian Vegetables . Puree texture diet - . 2 oz Pur Bread Sticks . On 07/24/2024 at 11:10 AM, the trayline was set up for Lunch and a 3-ounce spoodle was observed in the Italian Vegetables. The AM [NAME] was asked if she had seen the extended menu. The AM [NAME] said yes and got the menus. When asked if she had seen these extended menus before today; the AM [NAME] said she had seen this type of menu in other facilities, but not at this facility. Upon looking at the Week 2 menu for Wednesday, the AM [NAME] saw the 4-ounce portion listed for the Italian Vegetables and got the appropriate 4-ounce spoodle for service. No puree bread was prepared to be served on the trayline for the lunch service. The facility's Spring/Summer 2024 Menu for Week 2, Wednesday, Supper on 07/24/2024 included the following: Regular texture diet - . 6 oz Beef Chili w/ (with) Beans . Mechanical Soft texture diet - . 6 oz Beef Chili w/ Beans . Puree texture diet - . 3 oz Pur Beef Chili w/ Beans . 4 oz Pur Peas & (and) Carrots . 2 oz Pur Bread . On 07/24/2024 at 4:43 PM, the Supper trayline was ongoing with the PM [NAME] serving from the steamtable. The serving utensils being used for portioning Supper included the following: A 4-ounce spoodle was used to serve the Beef Chili w/ Beans. A 3-ounce spoodle was used to serve the Puree Beef Chili w/ Beans. A 3-ounce spoodle was used to serve the Puree Peas & Carrots. There was no puree bread on the trayline for the Supper service. On 07/24/2024 at 5:20 PM, the PM [NAME] was interviewed. When asked how she knew what to serve for Supper; the PM [NAME] went to the food production area and explained that she looked at the menu to determine what to prepare, indicating the Sunday through Saturday menu for Week 2 and the Daily Menu for Wednesday. Upon being asked how she knew the amount to serve; the PM [NAME] said she did not know, as there was nothing on these menus about portion size. The PM [NAME] was shown the seven days of extended menus now in the plastic sleeve behind the Sunday through Saturday menu. The PM [NAME] said she had not seen these extended menus before. The PM [NAME] also said she had not served bread to the Puree diets. On 07/24/2024 at 5:30 PM, the Dietary Manager was asked how the cooks were expected to ensure the correct portion size for sliced meats without a food portion scale. The Dietary manager said the cooks could know for sure without weighing to check it. When asked why was it important for the cooks to know the food portion to serve the residents, the Dietary Manager said it was important for the residents to receive a regular portion meal. On 07/25/2024 at 3:10 PM, the Registered Dietitian (RD) was interviewed. When asked the concern if residents were served portions less than those listed on the menu or if food items were omitted; the RD said then they are not getting enough food and the concerns would be weight loss, possible skin breakdown, and dehydration. In a follow-up call to the RD on 07/26/2024 at 12:08 PM, the RD agreed the menu for Week 2, Wednesday Supper meal was incorrect based on the Chili - 4042 recipe and that the Puree diets should receive a 6-ounce portion of pureed Beef Chili w/ Beans. The RD further said she would need to look at all the menu extensions for texture modified/therapeutic diets to make sure they were correct. RI #35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Dysphagia Oropharyngeal Phase, Unspecified Protein-Calorie Malnutrition, and Adult Failure to Thrive. RI #35's July 2024 Order Summary Report, dated July 25, 2024, documented the following: . Regular Diet Pureed texture, Regular consistency, for diet . Order Date 02/17/2020 . Ensure Plus three times a day . Order Date 07/11/2024 . Monthly weight every day shift starting on the 1st and ending on the 1st every month . Order Date 11/22/2023 . Weekly weights x (times) 4 (four) weeks every day shift every Mon (Monday) . Order Date 7/11/2024 . RI #35's Meal Intake records from Breakfast on 06/08/2024 through Breakfast on 07/25/2024 indicated a value of 3 (meaning 76 % to 100 % of the meal was consumed) for 128 meals and a value of 2 (meaning 51 % to 75 % of the meal was consumed) for ten meals. RI #35's Weights and Vitals Summary documented the resident weighed 197 lbs. (pounds) on 01/02/2024 and 176 lbs. on 07/06/2024. RI #35 lost 21 pounds and had a 10.7 percent weight loss over 180 days. RI #35's Progress Notes *NEW* documented the following: . 07/11/2024 . Note: July Monthly wt.(weight) reported down to 176# (pounds), loss of 10.7% (percent) or 21# from January. Recommend weekly wts. for now and increase Ensure Plus to TID (three times daily). (name of Registered Dietitian) Dietary - Registered Dietician (Dietitian) . RI #35's July 2024 Medication Administration Record (MAR) documented RI #35 received his/her Ensure Plus supplement twice daily from 07/01/2024 to 07/10/2024 and then three times daily beginning 07/11/2024 through 07/24/2024. On 07/25/2024 at 3:10 PM, the Registered Dietitian (RD) was interviewed. When asked the concern if residents were served portions less than those listed on the menu or if food items were omitted; the RD said then the residents were not getting enough food and the concerns would be weight loss, possible skin breakdown, and dehydration. Upon being asked the concern if a resident did not receive the nutritional values as approved by the RD for a Regular Puree Diet, the RD said potential for weight loss. The RD further said the facility should have been serving the portions residents were supposed to get. When asked about RI #35, the RD said the resident had weight loss over six months and it was now significant weight loss. The RD further said approaches were put in to address the weight loss; but, if not enough food was being served, the facility needed to in-service dietary staff on proper portion size and to give the staff the serving tools they need.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0558 (Tag F0558)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, record review and a facility policy titled Answering the Call light, the facility failed to a...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, record review and a facility policy titled Answering the Call light, the facility failed to accommodate the needs of Resident Identifier (RI) #'s 21, 26, 31 and 34 by failing to ensure the call light was accessible on three of six days of the survey. This affected RI #'s, 21, 26, 31 and 34, four of 34 sampled residents. This deficient practice was cited as a result of investigation of complaint/report number AL00046050. Findings Include: Review of a policy titled Answering the Call Light, revised September 2022, documented: . The purpose of this procedure is to ensure timely responses to the resident's requests and needs . 5. Ensure that the call light is accessible to the resident . RI #21 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Weakness and Dysphagia. On 04/02/2024 at 7:05 PM during the initial tour of the facility the surveyor observed RI #21's call light out of reach. The call light cord was behind the bed on the wall and was not in reach. On 04/03/2024 at 4:49 PM the Surveyor and Maintenance Director (MTD) observed RI #21's call light cord by the wall out of RI #21's reach. The Maintenance Director was asked what he saw and said the call light was out of reach and further said the resident should have access to the call cord in case of an emergency. RI #26 was readmitted to the facility 09/19/2022 with diagnoses to include a history of falling. On 04/02/2024 at 7:39 PM during the initial tour of the facility the surveyor observed RI #26 sitting in his/her recliner. The call light cord was behind the resident and out of his/her reach. On 04/03/2024 at 4:59 PM the surveyor and Maintenance Director observed RI #26's call light cord behind his/her recliner. The Maintenance Director was asked if the call light would be accessible from the recliner or the bed. The MTD said the call light cord was not long enough to reach if the resident was in bed. RI #31 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include contracture of left hip. On 04/02/2024 at 7:38 PM the surveyor observed RI #31 lying in the bed. The resident's call light cord was behind the bed out of RI #31's reach. On 04/03/2024 at 12:08 PM the surveyor observed RI #31 lying in the bed. The resident's call light cord was behind the bed out of RI #31's reach. On 04/03/2024 at 4:55 PM, the surveyor and Maintenance Director observed RI #31's call light cord hanging on the wall out of reach. The Maintenance Director was asked what he saw, and he said the call light was out of reach and the risk of this would be something could happen to the resident. RI #34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis to include Muscle Weakness. On 04/04/2024 at 9:00 AM, The surveyor observed RI #34 lying in bed. The call light cord was not near the head of the bed. The call light was not in reach. An interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 04/04/2024 at 12:51 PM. During the interview, the DON was asked about the residents' ability to get assistance when their call light was out of reach. In response, the DON stated that if the call light was not within reach, the residents would be unable to call for help. Furthermore, the DON said that this would be a risk as the residents may have an emergency and not be able to use the call light. The DON said residents should have access to a working call light at all times. An interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 04/06/2024, at 11:10 AM. During the interview, the DON was asked if RI #34's call light should be within reach. The DON said that it should be, in order to ensure that the resident's needs are met. Additionally, the DON said that call lights should be accessible for all residents to meet their needs and guarantee they are receiving adequate care. The DON said that the potential negative consequence of call lights not being within reach would be the possibility of the resident's needs not being met.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Report Alleged Abuse (Tag F0609)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, record reviews, facility policy GHC Abuse Policy and review of an ADPH Online reporting form, the facility ...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, record reviews, facility policy GHC Abuse Policy and review of an ADPH Online reporting form, the facility failed to ensure allegation of abuse was reported to the Alabama Department of Public Health (ADPH) within two hours on 10/11/2023 for Resident Identifier (RI) #3. On 10/11/2023 at 5:40 PM facility staff reported an allegation of verbal abuse for RI #3. The facility reported the allegation of verbal abuse at 8:24 PM on 10/11/2024 to ADPH. This failure affected one (RI #3) of fifteen sampled residents reviewed for abuse. This deficient practice was cited as a result of the investigation of complaint/report number AL00045846 and AL00047519. Cross-Reference F600 Findings included: A review of a facility's policy titled, GHC Abuse Policy, Updated 8-2022, revealed, . Reporting Serious Crimes- Elder Justice Act . 2. Each covered individual shall report immediately, but not later than 2 hours after forming the suspicion . RI #3 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE]. A review of the Alabama Department of Public Health Online Incident Reporting System revealed a Confirmation of Receipt of Online Incident Report, dated 10/11/2023, that indicated the facility submitted a report of alleged physical abuse to the state survey agency on 10/11/2023 at 8:24 PM. The report indicated the allegation was reported to the Administrator on 10/11/2023 at 5:50 PM. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #8 indicated that on 10/11/2023 she listened to a recording that the family had made of Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #16 and CNA #17 verbally abusing resident. The report identified RI #3 as the affected resident. During an interview on 04/04/2024 at 9:22 AM, Infection Control Nurse, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #8 stated she was working a double shift on 10/11/2023, and a family member brought a recording that was on her phone of CNA #16 and CNA #17 providing care for their family member and being verbally abusive. LPN #8 stated that she listened to about thirty seconds of the recording, and it was so bad she stopped listening to the recording. She stated that she immediately reported the abuse to the Administrator (Former Administrator #2). During a phone interview on 04/04/2024 at 1:40 PM with the previous the Former Administrator #2, former Abuse Coordinator, she stated that the abuse allegation should have been reported ADPH within two hours of the abuse allegation being reported.
CONCERN (D) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Medication Errors (Tag F0758)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on record review, interviews and review of facility policies Antipsychotic Medication Use, and Administering Medications, the facility failed to ensure Resident Identifier (RI) #1 was assessed a...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review, interviews and review of facility policies Antipsychotic Medication Use, and Administering Medications, the facility failed to ensure Resident Identifier (RI) #1 was assessed and monitored by licensed staff after receiving a onetime dose of Lorazepam (Ativan), when RI #1 became agitated and expressed he/she was going to leave the facility. This occurred on 02/05/2023 and affected RI #1. This deficient practice was cited as a result of investigation of complaint/report number AL00043280. Findings Include: Review of a facility policy Antipsychotic Medication Use with a revised date of July 2022 documented . Policy Interpretation and Implementation . 2. The attending physician and other staff will gather and document information to clarify a resident's behavior, mood, function, medical condition, specific symptoms, and risks to the resident and others. 17. The staff will observe, document, .information regarding the effectiveness of any interventions, including the antipsychotic medications. 18. Nursing staff shall monitor for and report any of the following side effects and adverse consequences of antipsychotic medications . Review of a facility policy Administering Medications with a revised date of April 2019 documented . Policy Interpretation and Implementation . 23. As required or indicated for a medication, the individual administering the medication records in the resident's medical record: . f. any results achieved and when the results were observed, . RI #1 was admitted to the facility 09/19/2022, with diagnoses of Alcohol Abuse and Anxiety Disorder. A review of RI #1's Quarterly Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference date of 01/02/2023 indicated RI #1 with a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 12 of 15 which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. Review of RI #1's Progress Notes dated 02/05/2023 at 1:15 PM documented RI #1 walking around yelling, and screaming that (he/she) is about to leave here, and (he/she) is calling the police and will jump out the window if (he/she) has to. The MD was contacted, and an order given for a one time dose of Ativan. The next entry was at 16:10 (4:10 PM) RI #1 was found away from the facility walking on the road. RI #1 stated was going to get a beer and coming back. Further review of RI #1's record did not indicate documentation from licensed staff after the Ativan was administered to indicate effectiveness or not. A review RI #1's Medication Administration Record for February 2023 indicated Ativan was administered on 02/05/2023 at 2:21 PM. On 04/05/2024 at 3:00 PM during an interview with the Medical Director, he said he was called due to RI #1 being agitated saying he/she was leaving. The MD said he gave an order for one dose of Ativan for agitation. The MD said RI #1 did not have behaviors prior to this event. The MD said he was not sure why the staff did not keep closer watch on RI #1, and he/she was then found having left the facility. The MD said RI #1 should have been assessed after the Ativan was given within about 30 minutes. He said the assessment should be documented in the medical record by the nurses. The MD said RI #1 should have been monitored for effectiveness and side effects such as over sedation, more agitation, an unusual change in mood or behavior. The MD said he was unsure if RI #1 was monitored once the Ativan was given. The MD was asked what interventions were done prior to administering the Ativan; he said it was standard practice to redirect and try to calm the resident. If that was unsuccessful call the physician and if necessary, send out to the hospital for evaluation. He was not sure if that was done. On 04/06/2024 at 10:00 AM, during an interview with the Director of Nursing, she said the policy for administering medication was right resident, right medication, time given, document given, and the monitoring of any adverse effects. The DON said Ativan was an antianxiety medication. She said when staff gives a resident new medication of Ativan one time dose, they should chart it was given then follow up in 15 to 30 minutes for effectiveness or adverse effects. When asked how the nurse monitored RI #1 once she gave him/her the Ativan; she said according to the record they did not monitor him. The DON said RI #1 should have been monitored for respiratory changes and changes in mental status. The nurse should have made some documentation after she administered the Ativan. The DON said the concern with the nurse not monitoring RI #1 when she gave him/her the Ativan one time dose was she did not monitor for effectiveness or any side effects.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0583 (Tag F0583)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

Based on interviews, a third party complaint and the facility's policy titled EMPLOYEE RESPONSIBLITY ON-THE JOB, the facility failed to ensure residents' Protected Health Information (PHI) was protect...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on interviews, a third party complaint and the facility's policy titled EMPLOYEE RESPONSIBLITY ON-THE JOB, the facility failed to ensure residents' Protected Health Information (PHI) was protected when the Director of Rehabilitation (DOR) used her personal computer to review and chart notes for rehabilitation therapy residents. This had the potential to affect 12 residents that received therapy in the month of October. This deficient practice was cited as a result of the investigation of complaint/ report #AL00048377. Findings Include: An anonymous complaint dated 07/19/2024 alleged that the facility's governing body failed to provide adequate computers and staff were using personal laptops and creating a potential for HIPPA violations. The facility's policy titled EMPLOYEE RESPONSIBLITY ON-THE JOB, dated April 2023, documented, HIPAA At (facility name), we are required by law to meet certain standards for protecting the privacy and security of our residents' health information. (Facility name) is a covered entity subject to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). HIPAA protects Protected Health Information or PHI, which refers to all information that relates to the past, present or future health of a resident, the provision of care to a resident . PHI is protected in any format including . electronic . The facility will not condone the unauthorized use, access to, or release of PHI . An interview was conducted with the DOR on 07/25/2024 at 9:28 AM. She stated the Administrator at the time was aware that she was using her personal computer for facility use. She stated the facility did not have enough computers for her department and she volunteered to purchase a computer and use for work. She stated she used the computer for reviewing and charting resident's notes. She stated the software used for her department was retrieved through internet explorer. The DOR admitted the concern for using personal computers instead of facility issued computer was privacy. A second interview was conducted with the DOR on 07/25/2024 at 3:04 PM. She stated she used her personal computer in October 2023. The DOR stated that she did not know how many residents were charted on in October, but 12 residents received therapy services in October 2023. On 07/25/2024 at 3:26 PM, a telephone interview was conducted with Former Administrator #14. Former Administrator #14 said staff using their personal computer for work was a potential HIPAA violation. An interview was conducted with the Chief of Operations (COO) on 07/24/2024 at 10:25 AM. The COO stated he was made aware that staff were using their own computers and he informed them it was unacceptable and gave permission to purchase more computers. He stated staff claimed there were not enough computers. The COO stated the concern of staff using their personal computers was HIPPA and privacy concerns.
CONCERN (E) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Safe Environment (Tag F0584)

Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and facility policies titled, Homelike Environment and Resident Rights the facility failed to...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, interviews, and facility policies titled, Homelike Environment and Resident Rights the facility failed to ensure: 1) Baseboards on the 400 hall were not missing leaving white sheet rock with peeled paint exposed; 2) Ceiling tiles were not missing in the Physical Therapy (PT) room; 3) Scuffs and holes were not on the wall outside of the PT room; 4) Handrails around the 400 hall were not missing pieces on the corners and easily removable; 5) RI #19 and #27's room did not have electrical box hanging from the ceiling with excessive wire hanging out; 6) The linen room on the 400 unit was not missing a ceiling tile exposing the main drain line; 7) RI #21's room did not have a ceiling tile with brown color stain; 8) RI #26's room did not have cable wire loosely hanging from the ceiling. This deficient practice was cited as a result of investigation of complaint/report number AL00045036 Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled, Homelike Environment revealed: . Policy Interpretation and Implementation . 2. The facility staff and management maximizes, to the extent possible, the characteristics of the facility that reflect a personalized, homelike setting. a. clean, sanitary and orderly environment; . On 04/03/2024 at 5:30 observations of the facility with the Maintenance Director (MTD) and simultaneous interviews were conducted with the MTD. 1) An observation was made on 04/03/2024 at 5:30 PM of the baseboards on the 400 unit with the MTD. The baseboards were missing, leaving white sheet rock and peeled paint. The MTD stated that the baseboards were not on the bottom of the walls because he had been fixing the floors and ran out of baseboards a couple of months ago. The MTD stated he was the only working on the baseboards at the time. The MTD stated the missing baseboards did not look good. 2) On 04/03/2024 at 5:32 PM an observation of the physical therapy (PT) room was conducted with the MTD. The PT room was missing two ceiling tiles. The MTD stated the ceiling tiles probably fell back into the ceiling. The MTD stated that there should not be any missing ceiling tiles. The MTD stated it should not have been missing ceiling tiles because it looked terrible. 3) On 04/03/2024 at 5:35 PM an observation of the wall outside of the PT room was made was with the MTD. The wall had black scuff marks, and an open area in the corner by the vent. The MTD stated that the marks and the hole was from the food carts hitting the doors. The MTD stated the wall should not have had the scuff marks. 4) On 04/03/2034 at 5:39 PM, an observation was made with the MTD of the handrails around the 400 hall. The ends of the railing at the corners were pulled off and set on the railing leaving the ends uncovered. The MTD stated that the corners of the handrails pulled off. The MTD stated that a resident came by and pulled off the ends or corners of the hand railing. The MTD stated he had not had the time to fix the handrails. He stated that there was a risk for a resident getting hurt due to the missing ends of the handrails. 5) RI #19 was readmitted on [DATE]. RI #27 was admitted on [DATE]. An observation was made on 04/03/2024 at 11:50 AM of RI #19 and RI #27's room. A cable wire and electrical box was hanging from the ceiling unsecured and away from the wall and the wire went behind the television. An interview was conducted with the MTD on 04/03/2024 at 4:41 PM. The MTD stated the electrical box was hanging down from the ceiling by the cable wire because that was how they ran the cable. The MTD stated he did not know how long it had been like that. The MTD stated that he could add an adapter box to secure the electrical box in RI #19 and RI #27's room. 6) An observation was made on 04/03/2024 at 12:18 PM of the 400 unit linen room. The observation of the linen room revealed a missing a large ceiling tile with exposed white pipes, large brown stains and black irregular spots on what appeared to be damaged drywall. An observation of the 400 unit linen room and interview with the MTD was conducted on 04/03/2024 at 4:45 PM. The MTD stated the missing ceiling tile that was seen was the main drain line that he had removed a few months ago due to a clogged drain. The MTD stated it was not fixed because he had forgotten about that area. The MTD stated that the area should have been fixed. 7) RI #21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. An observation on 04/02/2024 at 7:05 PM was made of RI #21's room. A cable wire was observed coming from the ceiling to the floor and then back up to the television. A ceiling tile above the closet cabinet, had a brown stain. An observation of RI #21's room and interview with the MTD was conducted on 04/03/2024 at 4:49 PM. The MTD stated the wire that was hanging down from the ceiling to the television did not look appealing and was not secured. The MTD stated it should not be left in that way. 8) RI #26 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. An observation was made on 04/02/2024 at 7:40 PM of RI #26's room with the cable wire hanging freely from the ceiling and had extra length that was curled up behind the television on the dresser. An interview was conducted with the MTD on 04/03/2024 at 5:00 PM. The MTD stated that the wire that was hanging down from the ceiling in RI #26's room should have been secured and the excess removed.
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Food Safety (Tag F0812)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview, the 2022 Food Code of the United States (U.S.) Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and the facility's policies for Floors, Food Storage, and Sanitation the facility fa...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, the 2022 Food Code of the United States (U.S.) Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and the facility's policies for Floors, Food Storage, and Sanitation the facility failed to prevent the potential for food borne illness by not labeling leftovers with a use by date and failed to prevent the potential for cross-contamination by when flies were observed in the kitchen for four of four days of the survey; the walk-in cooler storage racks and floor was observed to be dirty; ceiling vents were observed to be dirty; ceiling tiles had brown water stains and circular dark spots; drainpipes from the dishwashing machine, the scrap sink, and the Three-compartment Pot and Pan Sink extended into the floor drains did not have air gaps, and food was stored on a broken rack touching the floor in the Walk-in Cooler. This had the potential to affect all residents receiving meals from the facility's kitchen, 52 of 52 residents. This deficient practice was cited as a result of the investigation of complaint/ report #AL00048377. Findings include: The 2022 Food Code of the U.S.FDA included the following: . 3-305.11 Food Storage. (A) . FOOD shall be protected from contamination by storing the FOOD: (1) In a clean, dry location; (2) Where it is not exposed to splash, dust, or other contamination; and (3) At least 15 cm (6 inches) above the floor. 4-501.11 Good Repair and Proper Adjustment. (A) EQUIPMENT shall be maintained in a state of repair . (B) EQUIPMENT components such as doors, seals, hinges, fasteners, and kick plates shall be kept intact, tight, and adjusted . 4-903.11 Equipment, Utensils, Linens, and Single-Service and Single-Use Articles. (A) . cleaned EQUIPMENT and UTENSILS, . shall be stored: (1) In a clean, dry location; (2) Where they are not exposed to splash, dust, or other contamination; and (3) At least 15 cm (6 inches) above the floor. 5-402.11 Backflow Prevention. (A) . a direct connection may not exist between the SEWAGE system and a drain originating from EQUIPMENT in which FOOD, portable EQUIPMENT, or UTENSILS are placed. 6-201.16 Wall and Ceiling Coverings and Coatings. (A) Wall and ceiling covering materials shall be attached so that they are EASILY CLEANABLE. 6-202.15 Outer Openings, Protected. (A) . outer openings of a FOOD ESTABLISHMENT shall be protected against the entry of insects and rodents by: (1) Filling or closing holes and other gaps along floors, walls, and ceilings; (2) Closed, tight-fitting windows; and (3) Solid, self-closing, tight-fitting doors. (D) . if the windows or doors of a FOOD ESTABLISHMENT, or of a larger structure within which a FOOD ESTABLISHMENT is located, are kept open for ventilation or other purposes . the openings shall be protected against the entry of insects and rodents by: (1) 16 mesh to 25.4 mm (16 mesh to 1 inch) screens; (2) Properly designed and installed air curtains to control flying insects; or (3) Other effective means. 6-501.11 Repairing. PHYSICAL FACILITIES shall be maintained in good repair. 6-501.12 Cleaning, Frequency and Restrictions. (A) PHYSICAL FACILITIES shall be cleaned as often as necessary to keep them clean. 6-501.14 Cleaning Ventilation Systems, Nuisance and Discharge Prohibition. (A) Intake and exhaust air ducts shall be cleaned and filters changed so they are not a source of contamination by dust, dirt, and other materials. The facility's Dietary Service policy for Floors, undated, included the following: . All floors in the Dietary area shall be kept clean at all times. The facility's Dietary Service policy for Food Storage, undated, included the following: . Food storage areas shall be clean at all times. All food . shall be stored above the floor, on shelves, racks . or other surfaces which facilitate thorough cleaning, in a ventilated room, not subject to sewage or wastewater backflow or contamination by condensation, leakage, . or vermin. The facility's Dietary Service policy for Sanitation, undated, included the following: . All kitchen and kitchen areas shall be kept clean . and protected from . flies . During a kitchen observation on 07/22/2024 at 4:55 PM, multiple flies were observed in the kitchen around the steam table during the Supper trayline service. An observation of the Walk-in Cooler on 07/22/2024 at 5:12 PM, revealed the storage racks had a black/grey substance on them and the floor was dirty. During the Lunch trayline on 07/23/2024 at 11:28 AM, one fly was observed flying. At 11:53 AM, the ceiling vent near the trayline and steamer was seen to be dirty and it had a dark clump hanging from it, which appeared to be dust. Additional dust appeared to be hanging from the vent. An observation was also made of two ceiling tiles in the kitchen preparation area, which appeared to have water damage and have multiple circular, dark spots resembling mold. In the Dishwashing Room, the drainpipes from the dishwashing machine and the scrap sink were each extending into floor drains without airgaps. The intake ceiling vent grill in the Dishwashing Room appeared to be covered with dark dust. Nine flies were seen during a kitchen observation with the Dietary Manager at 5:18 PM on 07/23/2024. The back door of the kitchen was checked for an operating fly fan, but there was no fly fan to prevent flies from entering into the kitchen. The Dietary Manager said the facility had fly lights and glue strips, but no fly fan at the outer door. The Dietary Manager did not know why there was not a fly fan. The Dietary Manager said the problem with flies was that they would get on the food and cause contamination and the residents could get sick. While in the Walk-in Cooler with the Dietary Manager at 5:20 PM on 07/23/2024; a pan of rice, a pan of chopped ham, and a pan of tomato soup were seen without any labeled use by date. On 07/23/2024 at 5:25 PM, badly water-stained ceiling tiles in the kitchen were observed. One shelf with food stored on it in the Walk-in Cooler was observed to be broken and touching the dirty floor. When the Dietary Manager was shown the dishwashing machine and scrap sink drainpipes extending into the floor drains; she said the concern would be, Backflow. During an inventory check with the Dietary Manager at 5:37 PM on 07/23/2024, a ceiling tile with brown water stains was observed in the Dry Storeroom. The Director of Maintenance was interviewed on 07/24/2024 at 10:05 AM. When asked about the multiple flies seen in the kitchen, he said the back door needed to be kept closed or have a fan to help keep the flies out. On 07/24/2024 at 10:45 AM, the Director of Maintenance measured how far the following drains extended into the floor drains: Scrap sink drainpipe extended 3 1/8 inches into a floor drain, Dishwashing machine drainpipe extended 1 1/2 inches into a floor drain, and Three-compartment Pot and Pan Sink drainpipe extended 1/2 inch into a floor drain. The Dietary Manager was interviewed on 07/24/2024 at 5:30 PM. The Dietary Manager said potential food contamination was the concern for the water-stained ceiling tiles with dark black spots over the food production areas and the water-stained ceiling tiles in the Dry Storeroom. The Dietary Manager said the dirty ceiling vents could also cause cross-contamination to occur in the food. The Dietary Manager said the broken shelf touching the floor in the Walk-in Cooler was not six inches above the floor and that was not good for the food. When asked about the unlabeled rice, chopped ham, and tomato soup; the Dietary Manager said the use by date should be three days after the food was prepared. The Dietary Manager further said a leftover might accidently be used past the three-day period, if there was no labeled use by date. Upon being asked the concern of backflow from the floor drains entering the dishwashing machine, the scrap sink, and the Three-compartment Pot and Pan Sink; the Dietary Manager said it can harm the residents by contaminating the dishes and everything. During a kitchen observation on 07/25/2024 at 11:45 AM, two flies were seen in the food production area.
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0865 (Tag F0865)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on staff interview and review of the facility policy titled, Quality Assurance and Process Improvement Committee , the facility failed to maintain minutes of all QAPI meetings to document its on...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on staff interview and review of the facility policy titled, Quality Assurance and Process Improvement Committee , the facility failed to maintain minutes of all QAPI meetings to document its ongoing Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program. This had the potential to affect all 53 residents of the facility. The findings include: A review of a facility policy titled, Quality Assurance and Process Improvement Committee , with an updated date 8/4/22, revealed: .The committee shall maintain minutes of all regular and special meetings that include at least the following information: . b. The names of committee members present and absent; . During an interview with the Administrator on 04/25/24 at 08:16 a.m., the Administrator stated the facility had a QAPI policy. She was asked should the QAPI minutes have been signed by the members. She stated, yes. She was asked what the concern of the QAPI minutes was not being signed by the members in attendance. She stated, can not validate the meeting and who is in attendance.
CONCERN (F) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Room Equipment (Tag F0908)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observation, interview, the facility's policy for Sanitation, and the facility's Maintenance Request Orders; the facility failed to ensure kitchen equipment was maintained in working order an...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interview, the facility's policy for Sanitation, and the facility's Maintenance Request Orders; the facility failed to ensure kitchen equipment was maintained in working order and kept in good repair. This had the potential to affect all residents receiving meals from the facility's kitchen, 52 of 52 residents. This deficient practice was cited as a result of the investigation of complaint/ report #AL00048377. Findings include: The facility's Dietary Service policy for Sanitation, undated, included the following: . All utensils, counters, shelves and equipment shall be kept clean, maintained in good repair and shall be free from breaks, corrosion, open seams, cracks, and chipped areas. During a kitchen observation on 07/22/2024 at 4:55 PM, the soap dispenser for the handwashing sink in the kitchen was seen laying on the counter. On 07/23/2024 at 11:18 AM, the soap dispenser was not on the wall for the only hand washing sink in the kitchen. The soap dispenser was observed on a cart near the hand washing sink. There were only two paper towels on the counter and nothing in the paper towel dispenser. On 07/23/2024 at 11:53 AM, two ceiling tiles in the kitchen preparation area appeared to have water damage and had multiple dark spots resembling mold. There were broken and missing floor tiles in the dishwashing room, On 07/23/2024 at 3:40 PM, the Dietary Manager said she had reported the hand washing soap dispenser not being on the wall. The Dietary Manager further said she had put in a Maintenance Request for attaching the hand washing soap dispenser to the wall. When asked if she had put in any other Maintenance Requests recently, the Dietary Manager said, Yes and provided copies of the requests. The Maintenance Request Order sheets provided by the Dietary Manager were dated 10/7/2023, 04/10/2024, and 07/10/2024 and included the following repeated repair requests on all three dates: • Steamer not working, • Two Steam Table [NAME] not working, • Meat and Vegetable Preparation Sinks are leaking, • Clogged drain under the Vegetable Sink, • Three-compartment Pot and Pan Sink leaking, • Leaking ceiling in Kitchen and Dietary Office, • Metal plate beneath Walk-in Cooler threshold, • Broken wall and tiles in Dishwashing Room, and • Paper Towel Dispenser needed. In addition, the following repair requests were listed on both the Maintenance Request Order sheets dated for 04/10/2024 and 07/10/2024: • Top and bottom Convection Ovens are not working and • Cold Table on Serving Line not working. On 07/23/2024 at 4:40 PM, the handwashing soap dispenser was observed to still not be mounted on the kitchen wall. On 07/23/2024 at 5:00 PM, the Dietary Manager was interviewed. When asked why the steamer had not been working since October 2023, the Dietary Manager said the Maintenance guys were fairly new and there were no plans for the steamer yet. When asked why the top and bottom convection ovens had not been fixed, the Dietary Manager said last week the Maintenance staff showed her pictures of a convection oven they had found and might get, but she had not heard anything else about it since. The Dietary Manager said the facility needed the convection ovens and the steamer to make food in the kitchen. The Dietary Manager also said the key to the paper towel dispenser had broken off in the lock, so the facility needed a new paper towel dispenser. On 07/23/2024 at 5:25 PM, badly water-stained ceiling tiles in the kitchen were observed. Also observed exposed insulation beneath the doorway to the Walk-in Cooler due to a missing metal kick-plate. One shelf in the Walk-in Cooler was broken and touching the floor. During an inventory check with the Dietary Manager at 5:37 PM on 07/23/2024, a ceiling tile with brown water stains was observed in the Dry Storeroom. The Director of Maintenance was interviewed on 07/24/2024 at 10:05 AM. The Director of Maintenance said he had been working at the facility for four months and had hired two Maintenance employees to assist him. The Director of Maintenance said he was aware of the written maintenance request list from the Dietary Manager. The Director of Maintenance said he was told the failure of the steamer working had to do with the water sprinkler system; the steamer shut down when work was done on the fire sprinklers. The Director of Maintenance further said he was going to call a professional to come look at the steamer. The Director of Maintenance said the top and bottom convection ovens were not working, and said the previous maintenance person did not keep them up, and that he was shopping for a good price to replace them. The Director of Maintenance said he was planning to fix the leaking (Three-compartment Pot and Pan) sink himself. The Director of Maintenance said he was not aware the cold table on the serving line was not working. The Director of Maintenance said he knew the Meat and Vegetable Preparation Sinks were leaking and slow draining due to being clogged. The Director of Maintenance further said he snaked the drain, but it was slow draining again. The Director of Maintenance said he was aware of the ceiling leaks. The Director of Maintenance said he was working on the missing tiles in the Dishwashing Room. The Director of Maintenance said the previous maintenance person had made him aware of the missing metal piece (kickplate) beneath the door of the Walk-in Cooler. The Director of Maintenance also said he had seen the broken wall in the Dishwashing Room and was going to work on it. The Director of Maintenance said he knew of the soap dispenser not being on the wall and that it was now fixed. When asked who he needed to go to when a plumbing or professional consult was needed, the Director of Maintenance said the administrator. Upon being asked how long these problems had been going on; the Director of Maintenance said the problems were not new and had been going on since 2023 from looking at the written maintenance requests and that the previous maintenance person had passed these problems on to him. The Director of Maintenance said communication and problems getting services and equipment replaced were the reasons why it was taking so long to get the issues corrected. During a walk-through of the kitchen with the Director of Maintenance on 07/24/2024 at 10:45 AM, the AM [NAME] verified that two of the steam wells and the cold table on the serving line were not working. The Meat and Vegetable Preparation Sinks were observed to be leaking from the base of one of the two sinks. While looking at the steamer, the Director of Maintenance said it probably worked, but it would need to be evaluated by a professional. The hand washing soap dispenser was observed to not be on the wall. The Director of Maintenance said he would need to get a drill to set the soap dispenser on the wall, as the adhesive was not working. On 07/24/2024 at 11:45 AM, the Dishwashing Room wall to the right of the dishwashing machine table was observed to be damaged near the base of the wall. A blue metal panel was covering the open area in the wall. The metal doorframe adjacent to this area was badly corroded from the floor to about two feet up. During a follow-up interview with the Dietary Manager on 07/24/2024 at 5:30 PM, she said potential food contamination was the concern with the water-stained ceiling tiles with dark black spots over the food production and Cook's area and the water-stained ceiling tiles in the Dry Storeroom. The Dietary Manager said the broken shelf touching the floor in the Walk-in Cooler was not good for food storage. The Dietary Manager said it was hard to get the food production out on time without the steamer, the convection ovens, and cold table working. The Dietary Manager also said the Meat and Vegetable Preparation Sinks could not be used for food production when they were stopped up and leaking.
Jun 2021 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

Based on observation, interviews, and review of a facility policy titled Coronavirus (Covid-19), Prevention and Emergency Management, the facility failed to ensure Employee Identifier (EI) #24, a Cert...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observation, interviews, and review of a facility policy titled Coronavirus (Covid-19), Prevention and Emergency Management, the facility failed to ensure Employee Identifier (EI) #24, a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) cleaned and disinfected the blood pressure equipment between resident use. This deficient practice affected Resident Identifier (RI) #42 and RI #25; two of two residents observed who received their blood pressure monitoring. Findings include: Review of an undated facility policy titled Coronavirus (Covid-19), Prevention and Emergency Management, revealed the following: . Personal Protective Equipment and Supplies . 3. If equipment is used for more than one resident, it will be cleaned and disinfected according to the manufacturer's recommendations before use with another resident. On 6/15/21 at 8:50 AM, EI #24, a CNA, was observed to assess RI #42's blood pressure, by placing the equipment on RI #42's left arm. Without cleaning or disinfecting the blood pressure equipment, . EI #24 went into RI #25's room and placed the same piece of equipment on RI #25's right then left arm to assess RI #25's blood pressure. After EI #24 was done, she placed the blood pressure equipment (the cuff) on the medication cart, without cleaning or disinfecting it. On 6/16/21 at 12:35 PM, EI #24 was asked when and how should the blood pressure monitor be cleaned and disinfected. EI #24 replied, after each use with a Clorox wipe. EI #24 was asked, if she cleaned and disinfected the blood pressure cuff between residents. EI #24 replied, she did not remember. EI #24 was asked what was the harm in not cleaning the blood pressure cuff between residents. EI #24 replied, cross contamination. On 6/16/21 at 11:11 AM, an interview was conducted with EI #3, the Infection Preventionist. EI #3 was asked, how should equipment used for multiple residents like a blood pressure cuff be cleaned and disinfected. EI #3 replied, it should be cleaned with bleach between each resident use. EI #3 was asked, what was the potential harm if the cuff was not cleaned between each use. EI #3 replied, spread of infection from person to person.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0883 (Tag F0883)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, record review and review of the facility policy titled Immunizations of Residents, the facility failed to e...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, record review and review of the facility policy titled Immunizations of Residents, the facility failed to ensure Resident Identifier (RI) #48 was offered the pneumonia vaccine. This affected one of five residents reviewed for influenza and pneumonia immunizations. Findings include: A review of the undated facility policy Immunizations of Residents revealed PURPOSE: Ensure all residents are afforded the opportunity to receive vaccinations for preventable diseases. The best way to prevent pneumococcal disease is to vaccinate your patients. RI #48 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Pneumonia. During review of RI #48's medical record, a form titled INFLUENZA IMMUNIZATION INFORMED CONSENT was found. There was not a consent form for Pneumonia Immunization found in RI #48's record. During an interview on 6/16/21 at 5:27 PM, Employee Identifier (EI) #3, the Infection Preventionist, said she would ask when a resident was admitted about vaccination status and if vaccination was desired. If desired an order was written and signed by the doctor and sent to the pharmacy. The pharmacy would send the vaccine and it would be administered. The process would take about five days. In a follow-up interview on 6/16/21 at 5:54 PM, EI #3 was asked if RI #48 had been offered the pneumonia vaccine. EI #3 replied, she had not asked the sponsor and she did not see any documentation that RI #48 or the sponsor had refused or been offered. EI #3 was asked, who was responsible for assessing residents vaccination status. EI #3 replied, it was her responsibility to ask and document responses of residents upon admission to the facility. EI #3 was asked how often she reviewed resident immunizations. EI #3 replied, yearly, usually in October. EI #3 was asked, if she reviewed RI #48's immunization status in October. EI #3 replied, she had focused on the Influenza and Covid vaccines. EI #3 was asked, why had RI #48 not been offered the pneumonia vaccine. EI #3 replied, it had not been addressed. On 6/16/21 at 6:10 PM, an interview was conducted with RI #48's sponsor. The sponsor was asked, when had RI #48 received or been offered the pneumonia vaccine. The sponsor replied, she did not think RI #48 had received it and she did not recall it being offered by the facility.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
  • "What safeguards are in place to prevent abuse and neglect?"
  • "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • Licensed and certified facility. Meets minimum state requirements.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: Federal abuse finding, 8 life-threatening violation(s), Special Focus Facility, 4 harm violation(s), $316,228 in fines, Payment denial on record. Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 39 deficiencies on record, including 8 critical (life-threatening) violations. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
  • • $316,228 in fines. Extremely high, among the most fined facilities in Alabama. Major compliance failures.
  • • Grade F (0/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: This facility has a substantiated abuse finding. Extreme caution advised. Explore alternatives.

About This Facility

What is Knollwood Healthcare's CMS Rating?

KNOLLWOOD HEALTHCARE does not currently have a CMS star rating on record.

How is Knollwood Healthcare Staffed?

Staff turnover is 76%, which is 30 percentage points above the Alabama average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs. RN turnover specifically is 71%, which is notably high. RNs provide skilled clinical oversight, so turnover in this role can affect medical care quality.

What Have Inspectors Found at Knollwood Healthcare?

State health inspectors documented 39 deficiencies at KNOLLWOOD HEALTHCARE during 2021 to 2025. These included: 8 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death), 4 that caused actual resident harm, and 27 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.

Who Owns and Operates Knollwood Healthcare?

KNOLLWOOD HEALTHCARE is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by EPHRAM LAHASKY, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 71 certified beds and approximately 55 residents (about 77% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in MOBILE, Alabama.

How Does Knollwood Healthcare Compare to Other Alabama Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Alabama, KNOLLWOOD HEALTHCARE's staff turnover (76%) is significantly higher than the state average of 46%.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Knollwood Healthcare?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "What safeguards and monitoring systems are in place to protect residents from abuse or neglect?" "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations, the substantiated abuse finding on record, and the facility's high staff turnover rate.

Is Knollwood Healthcare Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, KNOLLWOOD HEALTHCARE has documented safety concerns. The facility has 1 substantiated abuse finding (meaning confirmed case of resident harm by staff or other residents). Inspectors have issued 8 Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility is currently on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes nationwide). The facility has a 0-star overall rating and ranks #100 of 100 nursing homes in Alabama. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.

Do Nurses at Knollwood Healthcare Stick Around?

Staff turnover at KNOLLWOOD HEALTHCARE is high. At 76%, the facility is 30 percentage points above the Alabama average of 46%. Registered Nurse turnover is particularly concerning at 71%. RNs handle complex medical decisions and coordinate care — frequent RN changes can directly impact care quality. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?

Was Knollwood Healthcare Ever Fined?

KNOLLWOOD HEALTHCARE has been fined $316,228 across 4 penalty actions. This is 8.7x the Alabama average of $36,241. Fines at this level are uncommon and typically indicate a pattern of serious deficiencies, repeated violations, or failure to correct problems promptly. CMS reserves penalties of this magnitude for facilities that pose significant, documented risk to resident health or safety. Families should request specific documentation of what issues led to these fines and what systemic changes have been implemented.

Is Knollwood Healthcare on Any Federal Watch List?

KNOLLWOOD HEALTHCARE is currently on the Special Focus Facility (SFF) watch list. This federal program identifies the roughly 1% of nursing homes nationally with the most serious and persistent quality problems. SFF facilities receive inspections roughly twice as often as typical nursing homes. Factors in this facility's record include 8 Immediate Jeopardy findings, a substantiated abuse finding, and $316,228 in federal fines. Facilities that fail to improve face escalating consequences, potentially including termination from Medicare and Medicaid. Families considering this facility should ask for documentation of recent improvements and what specific changes have been made since the designation.