BURNS NURSING HOME, INC.

701 MONROE STREET NW, RUSSELLVILLE, AL 35653 (256) 332-4110
For profit - Corporation 57 Beds Independent Data: November 2025 2 Immediate Jeopardy citations
Trust Grade
44/100
#91 of 223 in AL
Last Inspection: March 2023

Over 2 years since last inspection. Current conditions may differ from available data.

Overview

Burns Nursing Home, Inc. in Russellville, Alabama has a Trust Grade of D, indicating below-average performance with some significant concerns. They rank #91 out of 223 facilities in the state, placing them in the top half, and #2 out of 4 in Franklin County, meaning they have only one local competitor rated higher. However, the facility is trending worse, with the number of reported issues increasing from 2 in 2019 to 4 in 2023. While staffing is a strong point, with a perfect 5/5 rating and a turnover rate of 35% well below the state average, they have faced troubling fines of $23,989, which are higher than 94% of Alabama facilities. Specific incidents of concern include a critical failure to assist a resident during a transfer, leading to a fall and serious injury, and lapses in hand hygiene that pose infection risks. Overall, while there are strengths in staffing and rankings, the worsening trend and critical incidents raise significant red flags for potential residents and their families.

Trust Score
D
44/100
In Alabama
#91/223
Top 40%
Safety Record
High Risk
Review needed
Inspections
Getting Worse
2 → 4 violations
Staff Stability
○ Average
35% turnover. Near Alabama's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
Penalties
✓ Good
$23,989 in fines. Lower than most Alabama facilities. Relatively clean record.
Skilled Nurses
✓ Good
Each resident gets 73 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — more than 97% of Alabama nursing homes. RNs are the most trained staff who catch health problems before they become serious.
Violations
○ Average
7 deficiencies on record. Average for a facility this size. Mostly minor or procedural issues.
★★★☆☆
3.0
Overall Rating
★★★★★
5.0
Staff Levels
★★★★☆
4.0
Care Quality
★★☆☆☆
2.0
Inspection Score
Stable
2019: 2 issues
2023: 4 issues

The Good

  • 5-Star Staffing Rating · Excellent nurse staffing levels
  • 4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
  • Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
  • No fines on record
  • Staff turnover below average (35%)

    13 points below Alabama average of 48%

Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, fire safety.

The Bad

3-Star Overall Rating

Near Alabama average (2.9)

Meets federal standards, typical of most facilities

Staff Turnover: 35%

11pts below Alabama avg (46%)

Typical for the industry

Federal Fines: $23,989

Below median ($33,413)

Minor penalties assessed

The Ugly 7 deficiencies on record

2 life-threatening
Mar 2023 4 deficiencies 2 IJ
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Comprehensive Care Plan (Tag F0656)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, Resident Identifier (RI) #103's medical record review, and a facility policy titled Care Plan, Comprehensiv...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, Resident Identifier (RI) #103's medical record review, and a facility policy titled Care Plan, Comprehensive, the facility failed to ensure Employee Identifier (EI) #7 Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), followed RI #103's care plan intervention to have two persons assistance for transfer of RI #103 using a mechanical (Hoyer) lift. On 01/06/2023 EI #7, attempted to transfer RI #103, using a mechanical lift, by herself and without the assistance of another staff member. EI #7 stated she observed RI #103 slipping out of the Hoyer lift sling pad. EI #7 stated she attempted to lower the resident, but the resident fell from the mechanical lift, hitting his/her head on the floor. As a result of the fall, RI #103 sustained a laceration to his/her scalp and a hematoma that required being sent to the emergency room for treatment. The laceration to RI #103's scalp required 20 sutures to close the skin. A Computerized Tomography scan (x-ray images) confirmed RI #103 suffered a fracture of his/her C2 vertebra (second vertebra of the cervical spine or neck). This deficient practice placed RI #103, one of three residents sampled for requiring a mechanical lift for transferring, in immediate jeopardy, as it was likely to result in serious injury, serious harm, serious impairment or death. On 03/02/2023 at 10:36 AM, the Administrator, EI #1; the Director of Nursing, EI #2; and the facility's President, EI #12; were provided a copy of the immediate jeopardy template and notified of the findings at the immediate jeopardy level in the area of Comprehensive Resident Centered Care Plan, at F656-Develop/Implement Comprehensive Care Plan. The immediate jeopardy began on 01/06/2023 and continued until 01/13/2023, when the facility implemented corrective actions to correct the identified deficient practice and prevent recurrence; thus, immediate jeopardy past noncompliance was cited. Total census 50. Findings Include: A facility policy titled, Care Plan, Comprehensive, implemented 09/2016 and last reviewed/revised 01/2023 documented: Purpose: . The facility develops a comprehensive plan of care for each resident . to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental/psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment. The care plans will describe the following: 1. The services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Policy: .3 . f. Resident specific interventions that reflect the resident's needs and preferences . RI #103 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses that included Alzheimer's Disease and Macular Degeneration. RI #103's annual Minimal Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date of 11/07/2022 assessed RI #103 as a two person assist with transfers. RI #103's care plan for being at high risk for falls related to impaired balance and total dependence on two staff and mechanical lift for transfer staff was initiated on 08/22/2017 and revised on 10/14/2019. RI #103's care plan for an Activity of Daily Living (ADL) self care performance deficit related to weakness, Alzheimer's Dementia, Arthritis and Macular Degeneration was initiated on 08/22/2017 and revised on 05/10/2018 and documented an intervention as follows: . TRANSFER: The resident requires total assistance by 2 (two) staff to move between surfaces with use of Hoyer lift. RI #103's Incident Report dated 01/06/2023, prepared by EI #2, Registered Nurse (RN), Director of Nursing Services (DON), documented . Resident being transferred per (by) mechanical lift from shower bed . CNA verbalized resident began to slip out of lift pad. Attempted to assist. Resident fell to the floor and hit head. Immediate assessment completed. Laceration to the scalp measuring 4 cm (centimeter) x 4.5 cm noted. Hematoma noted at laceration site measures 9 x 6 cm. Moderate blood loss noted. EMS (Emergency Medical Services) contacted for transport to (name of hospital) for evaluation. RI #103's Emergency Department Record documented: . Details of the fall: The patient fell from an upright position. Onset: The symptoms/episode began/occurred acutely. Associate injuries: The patient sustained injury to the head, laceration, neck injury . Laceration . Wound repair of 4 cm . subcutaneous laceration to scalp. Skin closed with 20 . sutures. RI #103's hospital Radiology Report Details documented: Patient Name: RI #103's name . Procedure Date: 1/6/2023 . EXAM: CT (Computerized Tomography) Cervical Spine without contrast . IMPRESSION: Nondisplaced fracture through the posterior lamina of C2 with likely extension into the left C2-3 left facet . RI #103's hospital Discharge Summary Report documented: . Date of admission: [DATE] . Patient . who was admitted . after a fall at the nursing home. During that fall, (he/she) suffered a scalp laceration and then x-ray confirmed C2 fracture. During . hospital stay, . (RI #103) has been fitted for a cervical collar. DISCHARGE DIAGNOSES: Include head laceration, nondisplaced fracture of C2 (cervical), . On 02/10/2023 at 9:13 AM, an interview was conducted with EI #7, CNA. EI #7 was asked what happened on 01/06/2023 when she transferred RI #103. EI #7 said during transfer from the shower bed, she lifted RI #103 up in the lift and noticed RI #103 was sliding to the right side and was not in the sling properly. EI #7 stated she attempted to grab the lift and RI #103 fell to the floor. When asked how many staff were required to transfer RI #103 with a mechanical lift according to the care plan, EI #7 said, there was supposed to be two people, but it was just her. She further stated, she knew better, and RI #103's care plan documented that two people were required to assist with transfer. EI #7 said she did not follow the care plan since she transferred the resident by herself and stated if there had been two people transferring RI #103, there would have been two people to watch RI #103 to make sure she/he was in the sling properly and it was a safe transfer. EI #7 further said, RI #103 sustained a laceration and was told he/she may have a C2 fracture. EI #7 said the care plan was to be followed to avoid situations such as falling and having an injury, such as the case with RI #103. EI #7 confirmed this fall could have been avoided if two people assisted with the lift. On 02/09/2023 at 12:30 PM, an interview was conducted with EI #8, Registered Nurse (RN). EI #8 reported she went to RI #103's room after the fall on 01/06/2023. EI #8 said EI #2 (DON/RN) assessed RI #103, who had a laceration to the back of his/her head. EI #8 was asked how did RI #103 fall. EI #8 said RI #103 fell from the lift from what she could see. EI #8 said RI #103 was care planned for a two person assist with a Hoyer lift. On 02/09/2023 at approximately 4:15 PM, an interview was conducted with EI #2, DON regarding the incident involving RI #103 on 01/06/2023. EI #2 said she was notified by a staff member that they needed assistance on the hall. When she arrived, she observed RI #103 on the floor with the mechanical lift in front of RI #103. EI #2 further said she noticed the sling was attached to the lift. EI #2 said she observed blood on the floor, and she immediately assessed RI #103's head and found a laceration to the scalp and a hematoma. EI #2 said, EI #7 told her she did not have anyone assisting her with the transfer of RI #103 with the mechanical lift. EI #2 said, two persons were required for mechanical lift transfers. EI #2 stated, RI #103 was also care planned for a two person assist for transfer and that EI #7 did not follow the care plan policy. A follow up interview conducted with EI #2 DON on 02/10/2023 at 4:35 PM. EI #2 said, EI #7 did not follow RI #103's care plan. EI #2 stated, RI #103 has always been a two person assist with transfer. EI #2 further stated the care plan should be followed to ensure accurate and safe care was provided to the resident. On 02/10/2023 at 4:05 PM, an interview was conducted with EI #10, RN/Care Plan Coordinator. EI #10 said the purpose of the care plan was to have a plan of care for the residents so all staff could follow the plan of care. EI #10 said RI #103 required a mechanical lift and two person assist for transfer. EI #10 was asked if EI #7 followed the plan of care for RI #103 when she transferred RI #103 by herself. EI #10 said, no. When asked if EI #7 should have followed the care plan for RI #103, EI #10 said, yes. On 02/10/2023 at 4:15 PM, an interview was conducted with EI #1, Administrator. EI #1 was asked what the facility determined about how RI #103 fell. EI #1 said the facility determined EI #7 transferred the resident by herself and RI #103 fell from the sling. EI #1 continued to say that it was his understanding RI #103 fell away from the lift and if someone had been on the other side, RI #103 would not have fallen. EI #1 said, a lift was required for RI #103's transfer and RI #103 was care planned for two person assist with transfer. EI #1 was asked if EI #7 followed RI #103's care plan. EI #1 said EI #7 did not follow the care plan, but she should have. EI #1 was asked what was the purpose of the care plan. EI #1 said for staff to know how to care for the resident. On 03/01/2023 at 2:00 PM an interview was conducted with EI #11, RI #103's attending Medical Doctor. EI #11 was asked what did non-displaced fracture through posterior lamina mean. EI #11 replied, the posterior lamina was at the back of the neck along the outer ring of the vertebrae. EI #11 was asked what risks were associated with a C2 or C3 fracture. EI #11 replied, if the fracture displaced, it could potentially cause paralysis but with a non-displaced fracture it would be limited to limited range of motion until healed. EI #11 was asked if RI #103's injuries were serious. EI #11 replied that anytime a resident had a neck fracture that it was considered serious. This deficient practice was cited as a result of the investigation of complaint/report number AL00042944. ********************************************************* The facility took immediate action to correct the noncompliance by: 1. Reported the incident to Alabama Department of Public Health (ADPH) 01/09/2023 and conducted an investigation. 2. Completed in-service with staff on following care guides with transfer using the mechanical lift. Completed 01/09/2023. 3. The Care Plan Coordinator and designee reviewed the care plan for each resident who required the use of a mechanical lift to ensure resident specific interventions were present. Completed 01/09/2023. 4. DON completed assessment for proper sling fit for each resident who used a mechanical lift, and this information was added to resident care plan, Plan Of Care (POC) task list, and color coded paper identifier on closet door for any resident care planned for mechanical lift. Care Plan will be update by the MDS Coordinator/Care Plan Coordinator, with weight loss/gain, as well as any assessments. Completed 01/09/2023. 5. Quality Assurance (QA) meeting held on 01/07/2023 to create plan of correction (POC). 6. QA/Root cause analysis (RCA) meeting held on 01/13/2023. 7. Monitoring for two-person assist compliance . The Director of Nursing (DON), Administrator, or designee, will monitor through direct observation mechanical lift transfers during rounds that will occur using mechanical lift audit tool. Weekly for 4 weeks and then; monthly for 6 months and then; quarterly. Start date 01/07/2023 - Ongoing. After review and verification of the information provided in the facility's corrective action plan, inservice/education records, monitoring tools and the facility's investigation, as well as staff interviews, the survey team determined the facility implemented corrective actions from 01/6/2023 through 01/13/2023 with ongoing monitoring implemented; thus, immediate jeopardy past noncompliance was cited.
CRITICAL (J) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation

Accident Prevention (Tag F0689)

Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, review of Resident Identifier (RI) 103's medical record, RI #103's hospital medical records, the Resident I...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interviews, review of Resident Identifier (RI) 103's medical record, RI #103's hospital medical records, the Resident Incident Report, the facility Investigative Summary, a facility policy titled Safe Resident Handling/Transfer, the Arjo Sling/Size Guide, and a report submitted by the facility to the Alabama Department of Public Health Online Incident Reporting System, the facility failed to ensure Employee Identifier (EI) #7 Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) followed the facility policy for Safe Resident Handling/Transfer when EI #7 transferred RI #103 on 01/06/2023. On 01/06/2023, EI #7 CNA attempted to transfer RI #103 using the mechanical lift (Hoyer lift) by herself and without obtaining assistance from other staff; and further, EI #7 failed to utilize the appropriate size sling to according to the RI #103's weight during transfer using the mechanical lift. EI #7 stated she observed RI #103 slipping from the mechanical lift sling, resulting in RI #103 falling from the lift and hitting his/her head on the floor. RI #103 sustained a laceration to the scalp, with a hematoma (blood collected or pooled under the skin). RI #103 was transported to the local hospital for evaluation. While at the hospital, RI #103 was found to have a laceration to the scalp that required 20 sutures to close the wound. A Computerized Tomography scan (x-ray images) confirmed RI #103 suffered a fracture of the C2 vertebra (second vertebra of the cervical spine or neck). This deficient practice placed RI #103, one of three residents sampled who required the use of a mechanical lift for transfers, in immediate jeopardy, as it was likely to result in serious injury, serious harm, serious impairment or death. On 03/02/2023 at 10:36 AM, the Administrator, EI #1; the Director of Nursing, EI #2; and the facility's President, EI #12; were provided a copy of the immediate jeopardy templates and notified of the findings of substandard quality of care at the immediate jeopardy level in the area of Quality of Care, at F689-Free of Accident Hazards/Supervision/Devices. The immediate jeopardy began on 01/06/2023 and continued until 01/13/2023, when the facility implemented corrective actions to correct the identified deficient practice and prevent recurrence; thus, immediate jeopardy past noncompliance was cited. Total census 50. Findings Include: On 01/09/2023 the facility submitted an initial report to the State Survey Agency via the Alabama Department of Public Health Online Incident Reporting System. This report indicated RI #103 was transferred by mechanical lift and fell from the lift to the floor and had to be transferred to the hospital by Emergency Medical Services (EMS) and had a laceration to the scalp. A facility policy titled, Safe Resident Handling/Transfers, revised 11/2022 documented: . Policy: It is the policy of this facility to ensure that residents are handled and transferred safely to prevent or minimize risks for injury and provide and promote a safe, secure and comfortable experience for the resident . Compliance Guidelines: . 8. The facility will ensure . appropriate . sizes of slings to accommodate residents . on proper sling sizing. 10. Two staff members must be utilized when transferring residents with a mechanical lift. RI #103 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses that included Alzheimer's Disease and Macular Degeneration. Review of RI #103's annual Minimal Data Set (MDS) assessment with an Assessment Reference Date of 11/07/2022 revealed RI #103 was coded as a two person assist for transfer. RI #103's Incident Report dated 01/06/2023, prepared by EI #2, Registered Nurse (RN)/DON, documented . Resident being transferred per (by) mechanical lift from shower bed . CNA verbalized resident began to slip out of lift pad. Resident fell to the floor and hit head. Immediate assessment completed. Laceration to the scalp measuring 4 cm (centimeter) x 4.5 cm noted. Hematoma noted at laceration site measures 9 x 6 cm. Moderate blood loss noted. EMS contacted for transport to (name of hospital) for evaluation. A handwritten statement dated 01/06/2023, signed by EI #7 CNA documented: Was transfering (transferring) resident from the shower bed to (his/her) bed with the Hoyer lift. I started to turn the resident, and as I started to move (him/her) (he/she) started sliding out of the sling and then went backwards and hit (his/her) [NAME] (head). The nurse on the hall immediately came to address the situation . A handwritten statement dated 01/06/2023, signed by EI #8 RN documented: I was coming around the corner at nurses desk, when I heard a staff yelling, we need a nurse. resident . was laying on the floor, (his/her) left leg still in the sling. With CNA next to (his/her) and another staff member. As I got to resident I noticed blood under (his/her) head. I grabbed gloves and yelled for another nurse to come help me. Then I told the other nurse to get the DON. DON came running down the hall to assist me (with) the resident. I secured the residents head. DON provided wound care to laceration, dressing applied. EMS called. RI #103's Emergency Department Record documented: . Details of the fall: The patient fell from an upright position. Onset: The symptoms/episode began/occurred acutely. Associate injuries: The patient sustained injury to the head, laceration, neck injury . Laceration . Wound repair of 4 cm . subcutaneous laceration to scalp. Skin closed with 20 . sutures. RI #103's hospital Radiology Report Details documented: Patient Name: (RI #103's name) . Procedure Date: 1/6/2023 . EXAM: CT (Computerized Tomography) Cervical Spine without contrast . IMPRESSION: Nondisplaced fracture through the posterior lamina of C2 with likely extension into the left C2-3 left facet . RI #103's Discharge Summary Report documented: Date of admission: [DATE] . Patient . who was admitted . after a fall at the nursing home . During that fall, (he/she) suffered a scalp laceration and then x-ray confirmed C2 fracture. During . hospital stay . has been fitted for a cervical collar . DISCHARGE DIAGNOSES: Include head laceration, nondisplaced fracture of C2 (cervical), . The facility Investigation Summary dated 01/09/2023 documented the following regarding EI #7 CNA: . due to the extent of the noncompliance with proper policy and procedure with result in physical injury to the resident, termination of employment would be effective immediately. Therefore, termination/resignation of employment effective 1/9/23. On 02/10/2023 at 9:13 AM, a phone interview was conducted with EI #7, CNA. EI #7 was asked what happened on 01/06/2023 when she transferred RI #103. EI #7 said during the transfer from the shower bed, she lifted RI #103 up in the lift and noticed she/he was sliding to the right side and was not in the sling properly. EI #7 said she attempted to grab the lift, but RI #103 fell to the floor. When asked about training on the proper use of the mechanical lift and the appropriate sling size for residents, EI #7 said, she had been trained but did not remember when. EI #7 said, determination of the sling size to use was made by the resident's weight and the slings were color coded by size and weight. When asked what RI #103's weight was, EI #7 did not know. However, EI #7 said, RI #103 was a large person, so she used a large sling which was a blue color. When asked what RI #103's care plan documented about transfer with a mechanical lift, EI #7 said, RI #103 was a two person assist for transfer. EI #7 said, if she had followed RI #103's care plan for two people transferring RI #103 with the mechanical lift, there would have been two people watching RI #103 to ensure RI #103 was in the sling properly for a safe transfer. EI #7 said, she was disciplined about not following procedures and policies for transfer of residents using the lift. EI #7 said, the accident with RI #103 could have been avoided if she had done the right thing, and two people had assisted RI #103 in the lift transfer. EI #7 said, now she understood the consequences of not following the policy. On 02/09/2023 at 12:30 PM, an interview was conducted with EI #8 RN. EI #8 said, she heard someone say they needed a nurse. EI #8 stated, when she got on the hall, she observed RI #103 on the floor and RI #7 was by RI #103's side. EI #8 stated, she observed blood on the floor. When asked how RI #103 came to be on the floor, EI #8 said, she assumed RI #103 fell from the lift. EI #8 stated that RI #103 required a mechanical lift for transfers and the facility's policy was to use a two person assist with a mechanical lift. EI #8 said, the DON came to assess RI #103, treated the laceration on RI #103's head, EMS was called, and they stayed with RI #103 until EMS arrived. On 02/09/2023 at approximately 4:15 PM, an interview was conducted with EI #2, RN/ DON. EI #2 was asked what happened regarding the incident with RI #103 on 01/06/2023. EI #2 said she was notified by a staff member and when she arrived at RI #103's room she observed RI #103 on the floor and the mechanical lift in front of RI #103. EI #2 stated she noticed the sling was attached to the lift, blood was on the floor, and upon assessment of RI #103's head, she found a laceration to the scalp and a hematoma. EI #2 said, EI #7 had reported she was transferring RI #103 from the shower bed to bed when RI #103 began sliding to the right, and before EI #7 could help RI #103, RI #103 came out of the head position of the sling and fell on the floor. EI #2 was asked how many staff assisted with the transfer. EI #2 said, EI #7 told her she did not have anyone assisting with the lift at the time of RI #103's transfer. EI #2 said, EI #7 should have had another person to assist her with transfer of RI #103, as it had always been the policy of the facility to require two person assistance for transfer of residents by mechanical lift. EI #2 said, RI #103 was also care planned for a two person assist for transfers. EI #2 stated, EI #7 did not use the correct size sling during the transfer of RI #103. EI #2 stated, EI #7 used the blue sling and the appropriate sling color for RI #103 was yellow. RI #103's Weights and Vitals Summary documented, RI #103's weight was 145 pounds on 01/02/2023. An ARJO SLING/SIZE GUIDE documented a medium size sling with a yellow color code was the appropriate sling size for RI #103's weight range of 121-165 pounds. The extra large (XL) with a blue color code was recommended for adults who weighed 308-440 pounds. On 02/28/2023 at 2:50 PM, a follow-up interview was conducted with EI #2 DON. EI #2 was asked what the facility's process was for selecting the proper sling size at the time of RI #103's fall. EI #2 reported, at that time, residents who required mechanical lifts were weighed at least monthly, staff performing the transfer would check the resident's documented weight and follow the manufacturer's guidelines. On 2/10/2023 at 4:15 PM, the Administrator, EI #1 was interviewed regarding the incident involving RI #103 falling on 01/06/2023. EI #1 stated the fall could have been avoided if there had been two people assisting with the transfer. EI #1 stated it has always been the policy of the facility to make sure residents were transferred by mechanical lift safely with two persons. EI #1 stated, EI #7 did not follow the facility's policy when transferring RI #103 with the mechanical lift. On 03/01/2023 at 2:00 PM an interview was conducted with EI #11, RI #103's attending Medical Doctor. EI #11 was asked what did non-displaced fracture through posterior lamina mean. EI #11 replied, the posterior lamina was at the back of the neck along the outer ring of the vertebrae. EI #11 was asked what risks were associated with a C2 or C3 fracture. EI #11 replied, if the fracture displaced, it could potentially cause paralysis but with a non-displaced fracture it would be limited to limited range of motion until healed. EI #11 was asked if RI #103's injuries were serious. EI #11 replied that anytime a resident had a neck fracture that it was considered serious. This deficient practice was cited as a result of the investigation of complaint/report number AL00042944. ********************************************************* The facility took immediate action to correct the noncompliance by: 1. Reported the incident to Alabama Department of Public Health (ADPH) 1/9/2023 and conducted an investigation. 2. Completed in-service with staff on following care guides with transfer using the mechanical lift, facility lift procedures with return demonstration. Completed 1/9/23. 3. The Care Plan Coordinator and designee reviewed the care plan for each resident who required the use of a mechanical lift to ensure resident specific interventions were present. Completed 1/9/23. 4. DON completed assessment for proper sling fit for each resident who used a mechanical lift and this information was added to resident care plan, Plan Of Care (POC) task list, and color coded paper identifier on closet door for any resident care planned for mechanical lift. Care Plan will be update by the MDS Coordinator/Care Plan Coordinator, with weight loss/gain, as well as any assessments. Completed 1/9/23. 5. Quality Assurance (QA) meeting held on 1/7/2023 to create plan of correction (POC). 6. QA/Root cause analysis (RCA) meeting held on 1/13/2023. 7. Monitoring for two-person assist compliance . The Director of Nursing (DON), Administrator, or designee, will monitor through direct observation mechanical lift transfers during rounds that will occur using mechanical lift audit tool. Weekly for 4 weeks and then; monthly for 6 months and then; quarterly. Start date 1/7/23 - Ongoing. After review and verification of the information provided in the facility's corrective action plan, inservice/education records, monitoring tools and the facility's investigation, as well as staff interviews, the survey team determined the facility implemented corrective actions from 01/6/2023 through 01/13/2023 with ongoing monitoring implemented; thus, immediate jeopardy past noncompliance was cited.
CONCERN (F)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents

Based on observations, interviews and review of facility policies titled, Handling Clean Linen, Hand Hygiene, and Hand Hygiene Table, the facility failed to ensure: (1) Employee Identifier (EI) #5 Re...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on observations, interviews and review of facility policies titled, Handling Clean Linen, Hand Hygiene, and Hand Hygiene Table, the facility failed to ensure: (1) Employee Identifier (EI) #5 Registered Nurse (RN) performed hand hygiene in a manner to prevent the spread of infection. EI #5 was observed exiting Resident Identifier (RI) #16's room wearing gloves and holding a plastic medication tray containing a medicine cup, a used insulin syringe, a used lancet, and a used alcohol swab. While wearing contaminated gloves, she put her hand in her pocket to retrieve keys. She opened the medication cart, picked up sanitizing wipes from the bottom drawer of medication cart, and cleaned the plastic medication tray. (2) a laundry staff member did not hold a clean sheet against her body and allow the clean sheet to touch the floor while folding. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 50 residents in the facility. Findings Include: 1. A facility policy titled,Hand Hygiene, reviewed/revised 3/2020, documented Objective: All staff will perform proper hand hygiene procedures to prevent the spread of infection to other personnel, residents, and visitors. In addition, resident care staff shall assist residents with their hand hygiene to prevent the spread of infection. Policy: . 2. Hand hygiene is indicated and will be performed under the conditions listed in, but not limited to, the attached hand hygiene table. A facility document titled, Hand Hygiene Table documented hand hygiene was indicated by either using soap and water or alcohol based hand rub . After handling items potentially contaminated with blood, body fluids, secretions, or excretions . On 02/07/2023 at 10:50 AM, EI #5 Registered Nurse (RN) came out of Resident Identifier (RI) #16's room wearing gloves and holding a plastic medication tray containing a medicine cup, a used insulin syringe, a used lancet, and a used alcohol swab. EI #5 placed the plastic tray on top of the [NAME] Hall medication cart. EI #5 disposed of the syringe and the lancet in the sharps container and threw away the alcohol swab and the medication cup in the garbage. EI #5 then while still wearing the same gloves, put her gloved right hand into her right pocket and retrieved the keys to the medication cart. EI #5 unlocked the medication cart and opened the bottom drawer of the medication cart to retrieve sanitizing wipes from the drawer. EI #5 proceeded to pull out a wipe from the sanitizing wipe container and started cleaning the plastic tray for medications. On 02/07/2023 at 10:58 AM, an interview with EI #5 was conducted. EI #5 confirmed she did not change her gloves after coming out of RI #16's room. EI #5 said she did she not change her gloves before she started to clean the plastic medication tray because she was nervous and focused on cleaning it. EI #5 stated the tray was used to carry resident's medicines. EI #5 said the things that were on the plastic medication tray were an alcohol swab that was used to clean RI #16's skin before injecting insulin, the insulin syringe with safety cap engaged covering the needle, the finger prick for RI #16's blood glucose check, and a medication cup. EI #5 said she should have changed gloves after throwing away the sharps and alcohol pad to eliminate contamination between residents. EI #5 said, hands should should be sanitized before entering a room, after providing care, leaving a room, touching contaminated surfaces, and any time hands are dirty. On 02/09/2023 at 10:33 AM, EI #3, Infection Preventionist was asked about what EI #5 had been observed doing. EI #3 said the nurse should have changed the gloves and performed hand hygiene before cleaning the tray. EI #3 said a nurse should never reach in her pocket with dirty gloves to retrieve the keys for the medication cart due to the the risk of cross contamination. EI #3 said using dirty gloves to open a medication cart or pick up anything in the medication cart was a risk for infection and cross contamination. EI #3 said the nurse should have changed gloves and performed hand hygiene. On 02/09/2023 at 12:31 PM, EI #2 Director of Nurses (DON) reported that 26 residents' medications were stored in the [NAME] Hall medication cart. 2. A facility policy titled, Handling Clean Linen implemented 11/2019 documented, . Policy: . It is the policy of this facility to handle, store, process, and transport clean linen in a safe and sanitary method to prevent contamination of the linen, which can lead to infection. 6. Carry clean linen with clean hands away from your body. 7. Do not place clean linen on the floor or other contaminated surfaces. On 02/09/2023 at 09:13 AM, an observation was made of EI #6, Housekeeping/Laundry staff folding a clean sheet. EI #6, while folding the clean sheet tucked it underneath her chin and against her clothing. EI #6 also while folding the clean sheet, allowed it to touch the floor. EI #6 then finished folding the sheet on the clean folding table and stacked it with other clean sheets. EI #6 picked up another clean sheet to fold, held the sheet up, allowed the sheet to touch the floor, and then put it on the clean folding table. On 02/09/2023 at 09:14 AM, EI #6 was asked about the observation made of her folding the sheet, allowing it to touch her clothing and the floor. EI #6 stated staff should never hold a sheet against their clothing. EI #6 said the risk of touching her clothing against the clean sheet was that her clothes were dirty and getting the sheets dirty. When asked what should have been done, EI #6 said she should have held it away from her body. When asked about the sheets touching the floor, EI #6 said clean laundry should never touch the floor. On 02/09/2023 at 09:15 AM, EI #4, Housekeeping Supervisor was asked about what had been observed while EI #6 was folding clean sheets. EI #4 said, staff should not allow sheets to touch the floor or hold them against their body. EI #4 said, sheets would be dirty if they touched the floor. EI #4 said the clean sheet should never touch the body of the person folding it and staff should hold it away from their bodies. On 02/09/2023 at 10:33 AM, EI #3, Infection Preventionist was asked about what had been observed while EI #6 was folding clean sheets. EI #3 said, the laundry should not have been held against the person folding it due to the risk of cross contamination. EI #3 said clean laundry should not touch the floor when being folded because of cross contamination.
MINOR (C) 📢 Someone Reported This

A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint

Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact

Staffing Data (Tag F0851)

Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents

Based on record review, interview, and Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) Report, the facility failed to report staffing data from July 01, 2022 - September 30, 2022, to Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Servi...

Read full inspector narrative →
Based on record review, interview, and Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) Report, the facility failed to report staffing data from July 01, 2022 - September 30, 2022, to Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). This affected one quarter of data reviewed during the survey. Findings Include: The PBJ report generated for the quarter of 07/01/2022 through 09/30/2022 documented: . This Staffing Data Report identifies areas of concern that will be triggered . Metric Failed to Submit Data for the Quarter . Triggered = No Data Submitted for Quarter . On 02/09/2023 at 2:46 PM, an interview was conducted with Employee Identifier (EI) #1, Administrator. EI #1 stated he was responsible for turning in PBJ data to CMS. EI #1 was asked why the PBJ data was not reported to CMS from 07/01/2022 through 09/30/2022. EI #1 explained the data was not turned in monthly due to a computer issue, that was only recently resolved. EI #1 explained he planned to manually enter the data into the [NAME] system prior to the due date on 11/14/2022 but was unable to meet the deadline. EI #1 stated it was important to report the data because it was used for the facility's star rating and reimbursement rate.
Aug 2019 2 deficiencies
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Deficiency F0554 (Tag F0554)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, medical record review and review of facility policies titled, MEDICATION ADMINISTRATION BY MOUT...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, medical record review and review of facility policies titled, MEDICATION ADMINISTRATION BY MOUTH and Self-Administration of Medication, the facility failed to ensure a licensed nurse remained with Resident Identifier (RI) #32, who had not been assessed for self-administration of medication, during the administration of Miralax during medication pass observation on 08/21/19. This affected RI #32, one of four residents observed during medication pass observation and one of two nurses observed. Findings Included: A review of a facility policy titled, MEDICATION ADMINISTRATION BY MOUTH, with a REVISED DATE: 09/18/2014, documented: .9. The nurse will remain with resident/patient until medications are taken. A review of a facility policy titled, Self-Administration of Medication, with Date Implemented: February 2018, revealed: .1.an assessment is conducted by the interdisciplinary team and results of the assessment are recorded on the Self-Administration Assessment Form, which is placed in the resident's medical record. 2. As part of the interdisciplinary team, a physician order will ensure his/her participation in the assessment and recommendation.10. The care plan must reflect resident self-administration and storage arrangements for such medications. RI #32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of RI #32's medical record revealed no order for self-administration of any medications, no self-administration assessment form and no care plan for self-administration of medication. On 08/21/19 at 7:56 a.m., during medication pass observation, the surveyor observed Employee Identifier (EI) #1, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), mix RI #32's Miralax in four ounces of water in a plastic cup and deliver it RI #32's bedside, along with other medications. EI #1 administered all medications except Miralax. Surveyor observed EI #1 instruct RI #32 to drink his Miralax. EI #1 then left RI #32's bedside and entered the bathroom to wash her hands out of direct sight of RI #32. When EI #1 returned to the bedside, RI #32 handed her three plastic cups, two that contained liquid in them. EI #1 did not question RI #32 about the liquid remaining in the cups or if he/she had taken the Miralax. On 08/21/19 at 1:31 p.m., an interview was conducted with EI #1, LPN. EI #1 was asked how long should she remain with a resident when administering medications. EI #1 said, until they get completely done. EI #1 was asked did she remain with RI #32 while he/she drank the water that Miralax was mixed in. EI #1 responded she did not guess she did. EI #1 was asked, did RI #32 have an order to self-administer medications. EI #1 said no. EI #1 was asked had RI #32 been assessed to self-administer medications. EI #1 replied she did not think so. EI #1 was asked was RI #32 care planned for self-administration of medications. EI #1 replied not that she knew of and she had not seen it if he/she was. When asked what was the concern with not remaining with a resident until all medication was consumed or administered, EI #1 answered, somebody else could have gotten it or he/she could not have taken it. On 08/21/19 at 4:18 p.m., an interview was conducted with EI #2, Registered Nurse (RN)/Infection Control Preventionist/Minimum Data Set (MDS) Coordinator. EI #2 was asked how long should a nurse remain with a resident during medication administration. EI #2 said until all the medicines are taken. EI #2 was asked what should be in place before a resident can safely self-administer medications. EI #2 replied, an assessment form, physician order to self-administer, a care plan, nurse and resident education about self-administration. EI #2 was asked what was the concern with a resident self-administering medications without the proper assessment, physician's order, education and care plan. EI #2 answered, they could get the wrong dose, the wrong time or if it was left somebody could come by and pick it up that did not need it and the resident it was intended for may not get it.
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews, medical record review and review of Potter and [NAME], Fundamentals of Nursing, Ninth Edition,...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews, medical record review and review of Potter and [NAME], Fundamentals of Nursing, Ninth Edition, the facility failed to ensure a licensed nurse: 1. cleaned Resident Identifier (RI) #32's nasal spray prior to recapping, 2. removed gloves and washed hands and applied clean gloves after administering RI #32's inhaler prior to administering his/her nasal spray, 3. cleaned RI #32's inhaler prior to recapping, 4. cleaned RI #32's Morphine syringe prior to placing it back in a plastic sleeve, and 5. cleaned and dried RI #32's nebulizer mask and reservoir prior to storing it in a plastic bag. This affected RI #32, one of four residents observed during medication pass observation and one of two nurses observed. Findings Included: A review of of Potter and [NAME], Fundamentals of Nursing, Ninth Edition, Chapter 29, Infection Prevention and Control, page 455, documented: .Cleaning. Cleaning is the removal of organic material .from objects and surfaces .When an object comes in contact with an infectious or potentially infectious material, it is contaminated .Reusable objects need to be cleaned thoroughly before reuse . RI #32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. On 08/21/19 at 7:56 a.m., during medication pass observation, Employee Identifier (EI) #1, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), was observed administering RI #32's inhaler while wearing gloves. She then proceeded to administer RI #32's nasal spray while wearing those same gloves. EI #1 also recapped RI #32's nasal spray and inhaler without wiping or rinsing them off and returned a syringe used to administer RI #32's sublingual morphine back into a plastic sleeve without rinsing it prior to storing it in the medication cart. EI #1 was then observed returning RI #32's nebulizer mask and tubing back into a plastic bag without emptying the residue, rinsing and drying the reservoir. On 08/21/19 at 1:31 p.m., an interview was conducted with EI #1, LPN. EI #1 was asked what should she do after a resident has used an inhaler. EI #1 said wipe it off with a Kleenex or something like that. EI #1 was asked what should she do after a resident has used a nasal spray. EI #1 replied, same thing, wipe it off with a Kleenex or something. EI #1 was asked did she clean the inhaler before placing the cap back on it and storing it in the medication cart. EI #1 responded, no. EI #1 was asked did she clean the nasal spray after administering it to RI #32. EI #1 said no. When asked when she should wash her hands and change gloves during medication pass with different routes, EI #1 stated after each route. EI #1 was asked did she remove her gloves, wash her hands and apply clean gloves after administering RI #32's inhaler, before administering his/her nasal spray. EI #1 said no, she should have removed her gloves and went and washed them right then and put on a clean pair. EI #1 was asked did she clean the syringe used to administer RI #32's Morphine before returning it to the medication cart. EI #1 replied no. EI #1 was asked what should she do after administering a nebulizer treatment before storing the tubing and pipe back in the plastic bag. EI #1 said she should have wiped it. EI #1 was asked did she pour out the residue after RI #32's treatment. EI #1 stated no. EI #1 was asked what was the concern with these issues. EI #1 answered infection control. On 08/21/19 at 4:18 p.m., an interview was conducted with EI #2, Registered Nurse/Infection Control Preventionist. EI #2 was asked, when should a nurse change gloves and wash her hands during medication pass. EI #2 said, before she goes in, after she finishes and each time she goes from one route to another she should change her gloves and wash her hands or at any time she was not sure if she had touched something. EI #2 was asked, what should a nurse do with an inhaler and/or nasal spray bottle after administration and prior to storing back in the medication cart. EI #2 replied, wipe or wash the mouthpiece or nasal tip if needed before placing it back in the plastic bag. EI #2 was asked, what should a nurse do after administering morphine sulfate by a syringe prior to storing it in the container. EI #2 replied, wash it and dry it and put it back in the container. EI #2 was asked what was the concern with not washing hands or changing gloves when needed or not cleaning inhalers, nasal sprays, nebulizer pipes and reservoirs prior to them being stored. EI #2 answered, spread of bacteria and infections.
Aug 2018 1 deficiency
CONCERN (D)

Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed

Infection Control (Tag F0880)

Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident

**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record review, interviews, and review of a facility policy titled Infection Prevention and Control Progra...

Read full inspector narrative →
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record review, interviews, and review of a facility policy titled Infection Prevention and Control Program/Plan, the facility failed to ensure a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) performed hand hygiene between removing a pair of soiled gloves and re-gloving during incontinence care. This affected Resident Identifier (RI) #12, one of one resident observed during incontinence care. Findings include: RI #12 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of RI #12's quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, with an Assessment Reference Date of 7/02/18, revealed RI #12 had severely impaired cognition and required extensive assistance of one person for toileting and personal hygiene needs. RI #12 was always incontinent of both bowel and bladder. A facility policy titled, Infection Prevention and Control Program/Plan, revised September 2017, revealed: Policy: It is the policy of this facility to establish and maintain an Infection Prevention and Control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: . 4. Hand Hygiene Protocol: a. All staff shall wash their hands . after PPE (personal protective equipment) removal . Incontinence care for RI #12 was observed on 07/31/18 at 04:17 PM. Incontinence care was performed by Employee Identifier (EI)#3 and EI#4, both CNAs. During the care, while cleaning RI#12's bottom, EI#3 had stool on her glove. EI#3 removed the soiled glove and put on a new pair without doing hand hygiene. When EI#3 was finished wiping RI #12, she changed gloves again and did not do hand hygiene. An interview conducted with EI#3 on 07/31/18 at 04:35 PM. EI#3 was asked what should be done between removing soiled gloves and putting on a new pair. EI#3 replied, use germ x (sanitizer). EI#3 was asked if she did that every time she changed her gloved during the care. EI#3 said she did not think so. On 8/01/18 at 11:10 AM, the Infection Control Nurse, EI #5, was interviewed. EI #5 was asked what should be done after removing soiled gloves, before putting on a new pair. EI#5 replied, wash hands or use hand sanitizer. EI #5 said if that was not done, it could cause harm.
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Life-Threatening (Immediate Jeopardy)
J - Isolated K - Pattern L - Widespread
Actual Harm
G - Isolated H - Pattern I - Widespread
Potential for Harm
D - Isolated E - Pattern F - Widespread
No Harm (Minor)
A - Isolated B - Pattern C - Widespread

Questions to Ask on Your Visit

  • "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
  • "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
  • "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"

Our Honest Assessment

Strengths
  • • 35% turnover. Below Alabama's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
Concerns
  • • Multiple safety concerns identified: 2 life-threatening violation(s). Review inspection reports carefully.
  • • 7 deficiencies on record, including 2 critical (life-threatening) violations. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
  • • $23,989 in fines. Higher than 94% of Alabama facilities, suggesting repeated compliance issues.
  • • Grade D (44/100). Below average facility with significant concerns.
Bottom line: Trust Score of 44/100 indicates significant concerns. Thoroughly evaluate alternatives.

About This Facility

What is Burns, Inc.'s CMS Rating?

CMS assigns BURNS NURSING HOME, INC. an overall rating of 3 out of 5 stars, which is considered average nationally. Within Alabama, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This mid-range rating indicates the facility meets federal standards but may have areas for improvement.

How is Burns, Inc. Staffed?

CMS rates BURNS NURSING HOME, INC.'s staffing level at 5 out of 5 stars, which is much above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 35%, compared to the Alabama average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.

What Have Inspectors Found at Burns, Inc.?

State health inspectors documented 7 deficiencies at BURNS NURSING HOME, INC. during 2018 to 2023. These included: 2 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death), 4 with potential for harm, and 1 minor or isolated issues. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.

Who Owns and Operates Burns, Inc.?

BURNS NURSING HOME, INC. is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 57 certified beds and approximately 46 residents (about 81% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in RUSSELLVILLE, Alabama.

How Does Burns, Inc. Compare to Other Alabama Nursing Homes?

Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Alabama, BURNS NURSING HOME, INC.'s overall rating (3 stars) is above the state average of 2.9, staff turnover (35%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (2 stars) is below the national benchmark.

What Should Families Ask When Visiting Burns, Inc.?

Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations.

Is Burns, Inc. Safe?

Based on CMS inspection data, BURNS NURSING HOME, INC. has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 2 Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 3-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Alabama. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.

Do Nurses at Burns, Inc. Stick Around?

BURNS NURSING HOME, INC. has a staff turnover rate of 35%, which is about average for Alabama nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.

Was Burns, Inc. Ever Fined?

BURNS NURSING HOME, INC. has been fined $23,989 across 2 penalty actions. This is below the Alabama average of $33,319. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.

Is Burns, Inc. on Any Federal Watch List?

BURNS NURSING HOME, INC. is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.