ASHTON PLACE HEALTH AND REHAB, LLC
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Ashton Place Health and Rehab in Barling, Arkansas, has a Trust Grade of B, which indicates it is a good facility overall. It ranks #52 out of 218 in the state, placing it in the top half, and #2 out of 8 in Sebastian County, meaning only one local option is better. The facility is showing improvement, having decreased issues from 7 in 2024 to 3 in 2025. Staffing is rated average with a 3/5 star rating and a turnover of 57%, which is about the state average, but it has concerning RN coverage, being lower than 89% of Arkansas facilities. While there have been no fines, which is a positive sign, recent inspections revealed several areas of concern, such as staff not properly washing hands while handling food and failing to maintain proper food storage temperatures, which poses a risk for residents' health. Overall, while Ashton Place has strengths like its good trust grade and no fines, families should be aware of the staffing issues and the need for improvements in hygiene and food safety practices.
- Trust Score
- B
- In Arkansas
- #52/218
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ⚠ Watch
- 57% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Arkansas facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 16 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Arkansas. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 17 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
4-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
11pts above Arkansas avg (46%)
Frequent staff changes - ask about care continuity
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
9 points above Arkansas average of 48%
The Ugly 17 deficiencies on record
Mar 2025
3 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observations, record review, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a client with a right ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure manufacturer specifications were followed to maintain food quality; dietary staff washed their...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interviews, facility policy review, and facility document review, it was determined the facility failed to...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jan 2024
7 deficiencies
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0583
(Tag F0583)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure information regarding resident care was posted in a manner that protected the privacy of one 1 Resident (Resident #24) ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that lotions, perfumes, and powder containers were not allowed in the facility for 5 Residents (R#4, #38, #46, #54, and ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0760
(Tag F0760)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure physician's orders and the manufacturer's guid...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored in accordance with state laws and accepted standards of pharmacy practice for 1 (Resident #85)...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure foods in the dry pantry were properly sealed, dated and stored in 1 of 1 facility kitchens. This failed practice had t...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection control precautions were implemented...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Safe Environment
(Tag F0921)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents and staff. This failed practice had the potenti...
Read full inspector narrative →
Sept 2023
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(D)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident received care/urinalysis with culture ordered by the physician for 1 (Resident #1) of the 3 sample residen...
Read full inspector narrative →
Sept 2022
6 deficiencies
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility failed to ensure residents' fingernails were cleaned and trimmed to promote good personal hygiene and grooming for 1 (Residents #43) of 18 ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Incontinence Care
(Tag F0690)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to ensure foley catheter drainage bags were secured to pr...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0805
(Tag F0805)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure pureed food items were blended to a smooth, lump free consistency to minimize the risk of choking or other complicatio...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the opening between the clean and dirty side of the laundry room had negative air pressure from the clean side to the d...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure foods stored in the freezer, refrigerator, dry...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(C)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Social Worker
(Tag F0850)
Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents
Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to employ a qualified social worker with a minimum of a bachelor's degree to meet the needs of the residents. This failed practice had the pot...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Why is there high staff turnover? How do you retain staff?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Arkansas facilities.
- • 17 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
- • 57% turnover. Above average. Higher turnover means staff may not know residents' routines.
About This Facility
What is Ashton Place Health And Rehab, Llc's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns ASHTON PLACE HEALTH AND REHAB, LLC an overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars, which is considered above average nationally. Within Arkansas, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Ashton Place Health And Rehab, Llc Staffed?
CMS rates ASHTON PLACE HEALTH AND REHAB, LLC's staffing level at 3 out of 5 stars, which is average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 57%, which is 11 percentage points above the Arkansas average of 46%. High turnover can affect care consistency as new staff learn residents' individual needs.
What Have Inspectors Found at Ashton Place Health And Rehab, Llc?
State health inspectors documented 17 deficiencies at ASHTON PLACE HEALTH AND REHAB, LLC during 2022 to 2025. These included: 16 with potential for harm and 1 minor or isolated issues.
Who Owns and Operates Ashton Place Health And Rehab, Llc?
ASHTON PLACE HEALTH AND REHAB, LLC is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by CENTRAL ARKANSAS NURSING CENTERS, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 122 certified beds and approximately 116 residents (about 95% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in BARLING, Arkansas.
How Does Ashton Place Health And Rehab, Llc Compare to Other Arkansas Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Arkansas, ASHTON PLACE HEALTH AND REHAB, LLC's overall rating (4 stars) is above the state average of 3.1, staff turnover (57%) is significantly higher than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Ashton Place Health And Rehab, Llc?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "How do you ensure continuity of care given staff turnover, and what is your staff retention strategy?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's high staff turnover rate.
Is Ashton Place Health And Rehab, Llc Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, ASHTON PLACE HEALTH AND REHAB, LLC has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 4-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Arkansas. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Ashton Place Health And Rehab, Llc Stick Around?
Staff turnover at ASHTON PLACE HEALTH AND REHAB, LLC is high. At 57%, the facility is 11 percentage points above the Arkansas average of 46%. High turnover means new staff may not know residents' individual needs, medications, or preferences. It can also be disorienting for residents, especially those with dementia who rely on familiar faces. Families should ask: What is causing the turnover? What retention programs are in place? How do you ensure care continuity during staff transitions?
Was Ashton Place Health And Rehab, Llc Ever Fined?
ASHTON PLACE HEALTH AND REHAB, LLC has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Ashton Place Health And Rehab, Llc on Any Federal Watch List?
ASHTON PLACE HEALTH AND REHAB, LLC is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.