CAVE CITY NURSING HOME INC
Inspected within the last 6 months. Data reflects current conditions.
Cave City Nursing Home Inc has received an impressive Trust Grade of A, indicating it is highly recommended and provides excellent care. It ranks #4 out of 218 facilities in Arkansas, placing it in the top tier of nursing homes in the state, and is the best option among the three facilities in Sharp County. The facility is on an improving trend, having reduced its issues from five in 2024 to just two in 2025. Staffing is a strength, with a low turnover rate of 0%, meaning residents are cared for by consistent staff, although the overall staffing rating is average at 3 out of 5 stars. On the downside, there have been some concerning findings, including a failure to ensure proper food safety practices, which could potentially affect many residents, and that medication was not administered as prescribed for one resident. Additionally, the facility did not provide necessary information about advance directives for some residents, which could hinder their ability to make informed decisions about their care.
- Trust Score
- A
- In Arkansas
- #4/218
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Better
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- Turnover data not reported for this facility.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Arkansas facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 28 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Arkansas. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 11 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
Facility shows strength in fire safety.
The Bad
No Significant Concerns Identified
This facility shows no red flags. Among Arkansas's 100 nursing homes, only 0% achieve this.
The Ugly 11 deficiencies on record
Jul 2025
2 deficiencies
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered according to physician's orders for one (Resident #40) of five residents revi...
Read full inspector narrative →
MINOR
(C)
Minor Issue - procedural, no safety impact
Staffing Data
(Tag F0851)
Minor procedural issue · This affected most or all residents
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide Provider Enhanced Reporting Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) mandatory staffing data to the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (C...
Read full inspector narrative →
Apr 2024
5 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0558
(Tag F0558)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure thickened liquids kept in a cooler remained on ice/with ice packs for 1 (Resident #14) of 1 sampled resident who requir...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0578
(Tag F0578)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure written information regarding the right to formulate an adva...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident fingernails were kept clean for 3 (Residents #8, #53, and #66) of 3 sampled residents, oral hygiene was being ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the clothes dryers remained free of lint build-up to decrease the potential for fire and loss of laundry services in 1 ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper handwashing/hand sanitizing was completed during dining observation.
The findings are:
On 04/01/2024 at 12:06 PM...
Read full inspector narrative →
Feb 2023
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) was completed accurately, related to functional status for 1 (Resident #33) of 4 (Resident ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0688
(Tag F0688)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure palm grips was consistently utilized to prevent further decline in range of motion for 1 (Residents #45) of 5 (Residen...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed ensure humidified oxygen was administered at the physician prescribed rate for 1 (Resident #58) of 6 (R #4, R #17, R #24, R #58, ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure that dishes and utensils were stored properly, food was covered, and hands were washed between clean and dirty tasks to minimize the ri...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • Grade A (90/100). Above average facility, better than most options in Arkansas.
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Arkansas facilities.
- • 11 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
About This Facility
What is Cave City Inc's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns CAVE CITY NURSING HOME INC an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Arkansas, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Cave City Inc Staffed?
CMS rates CAVE CITY NURSING HOME INC's staffing level at 3 out of 5 stars, which is average compared to other nursing homes.
What Have Inspectors Found at Cave City Inc?
State health inspectors documented 11 deficiencies at CAVE CITY NURSING HOME INC during 2023 to 2025. These included: 10 with potential for harm and 1 minor or isolated issues.
Who Owns and Operates Cave City Inc?
CAVE CITY NURSING HOME INC is owned by a non-profit organization. Non-profit facilities reinvest revenue into operations rather than distributing to shareholders. The facility operates independently rather than as part of a larger chain. With 90 certified beds and approximately 76 residents (about 84% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in CAVE CITY, Arkansas.
How Does Cave City Inc Compare to Other Arkansas Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Arkansas, CAVE CITY NURSING HOME INC's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 3.2 and health inspection rating (5 stars) is much above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Cave City Inc?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is Cave City Inc Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, CAVE CITY NURSING HOME INC has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Arkansas. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Cave City Inc Stick Around?
CAVE CITY NURSING HOME INC has not reported staff turnover data to CMS. Staff turnover matters because consistent caregivers learn residents' individual needs, medications, and preferences. When staff frequently change, this institutional knowledge is lost. Families should ask the facility directly about their staff retention rates and average employee tenure.
Was Cave City Inc Ever Fined?
CAVE CITY NURSING HOME INC has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Cave City Inc on Any Federal Watch List?
CAVE CITY NURSING HOME INC is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.