DARDANELLE NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER,INC
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Dardanelle Nursing and Rehabilitation Center in Dardanelle, Arkansas, has a Trust Grade of B, indicating it is a good choice, solidly positioned among nursing homes. It ranks #8 out of 218 facilities in the state, placing it in the top half, and is the best option in Yell County. The facility's trend is stable, with the same number of issues reported in both 2024 and 2025, but there are notable concerns, including $14,020 in fines, which is higher than 78% of Arkansas facilities. Staffing is relatively strong, with a 4 out of 5 rating and a 44% turnover rate, which is below the state average. However, there have been critical incidents, such as failing to monitor a resident at high risk for elopement and concerns about food safety and pest control that could affect residents' health and comfort.
- Trust Score
- B
- In Arkansas
- #8/218
- Safety Record
- High Risk
- Inspections
- Holding Steady
- Staff Stability ○ Average
- 44% turnover. Near Arkansas's 48% average. Typical for the industry.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- $14,020 in fines. Lower than most Arkansas facilities. Relatively clean record.
- Skilled Nurses ⚠ Watch
- Each resident gets only 19 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — below average for Arkansas. Fewer RN minutes means fewer trained eyes watching for problems.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 12 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
-
5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover below average (44%)
4 points below Arkansas average of 48%
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, fire safety.
The Bad
Near Arkansas avg (46%)
Typical for the industry
Below median ($33,413)
Minor penalties assessed
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 12 deficiencies on record
Jun 2025
1 deficiency
1 IJ
CRITICAL
(J)
📢 Someone Reported This
A family member, employee, or ombudsman was alarmed enough to file a formal complaint
Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) - the most serious Medicare violation
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Someone could have died · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to monitor and supervise a resident with known high-risk elopement assessment and exit seeking behaviors to prevent elopement for 1 (Resident ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Aug 2024
1 deficiency
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observations, interviews, record review, facility document review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure proper hand hygiene was performed and enhanced barrier precautions...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jun 2023
5 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure nail care was regularly provided to maintain good hygiene and prevent potential injuries or infections for 1 (Resident...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0806
(Tag F0806)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident food preferences were honored and foods listed as dislikes were not served to promote good nutritional intake...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Respiratory Care
(Tag F0695)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the oxygen tubing and water bottle were dated for 2 (Residents #5 and #14) and a humidifier water bottle was not empty...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure food stored in the freezer was sealed and dated to minimize the potential for food borne illness, failed to ensure dietary staff wash...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0925
(Tag F0925)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an effective pest control program was maintained to rid the facility of pests. The failed practice had the potential t...
Read full inspector narrative →
Mar 2022
5 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) were completed accurately for 1 (Resident #19) of 19 (Residents #13, #41, #6, #59, #85, #73, #19, #15, #4...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a mechanical lift was utilized in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions to minimize the potential for transf...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0657
(Tag F0657)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the care plan was revised to reflect monitoring for signs and symptoms of aspiration to ensure the safety at mealtimes for 1 (Reside...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Quality of Care
(Tag F0684)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a Physician's Order for Knee high Compression hose were followed and documented to prevent or reduce edema for 1 (Resid...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was dated and utilized prior to the expiration date and food in an open carton was placed in a sealed container. The failed pract...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "What changes have you made since the serious inspection findings?"
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • 44% turnover. Below Arkansas's 48% average. Good staff retention means consistent care.
- • Multiple safety concerns identified: 1 life-threatening violation(s). Review inspection reports carefully.
- • 12 deficiencies on record, including 1 critical (life-threatening) violation. These warrant careful review before choosing this facility.
- • $14,020 in fines. Above average for Arkansas. Some compliance problems on record.
About This Facility
What is Dardanelle,Inc's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns DARDANELLE NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER,INC an overall rating of 5 out of 5 stars, which is considered much above average nationally. Within Arkansas, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Dardanelle,Inc Staffed?
CMS rates DARDANELLE NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER,INC's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 44%, compared to the Arkansas average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Dardanelle,Inc?
State health inspectors documented 12 deficiencies at DARDANELLE NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER,INC during 2022 to 2025. These included: 1 Immediate Jeopardy (the most serious level, indicating potential for serious harm or death) and 11 with potential for harm. Immediate Jeopardy findings are rare and represent the most serious regulatory concerns. They require immediate corrective action.
Who Owns and Operates Dardanelle,Inc?
DARDANELLE NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER,INC is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by CENTRAL ARKANSAS NURSING CENTERS, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 110 certified beds and approximately 87 residents (about 79% occupancy), it is a mid-sized facility located in DARDANELLE, Arkansas.
How Does Dardanelle,Inc Compare to Other Arkansas Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Arkansas, DARDANELLE NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER,INC's overall rating (5 stars) is above the state average of 3.2, staff turnover (44%) is near the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (4 stars) is above the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Dardanelle,Inc?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "What changes have been made since the serious inspection findings, and how are you preventing similar issues?" "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?" These questions are particularly relevant given the facility's Immediate Jeopardy citations.
Is Dardanelle,Inc Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, DARDANELLE NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER,INC has documented safety concerns. Inspectors have issued 1 Immediate Jeopardy citation (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death). The facility has a 5-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Arkansas. Families considering this facility should ask detailed questions about what corrective actions have been taken since these incidents.
Do Nurses at Dardanelle,Inc Stick Around?
DARDANELLE NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER,INC has a staff turnover rate of 44%, which is about average for Arkansas nursing homes (state average: 46%). Moderate turnover is common in nursing homes, but families should still ask about staff tenure and how the facility maintains care continuity when employees leave.
Was Dardanelle,Inc Ever Fined?
DARDANELLE NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER,INC has been fined $14,020 across 1 penalty action. This is below the Arkansas average of $33,219. While any fine indicates a compliance issue, fines under $50,000 are relatively common and typically reflect isolated problems that were subsequently corrected. Families should ask what specific issues led to these fines and confirm they've been resolved.
Is Dardanelle,Inc on Any Federal Watch List?
DARDANELLE NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER,INC is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.