COURTYARD REHABILITATION AND HEALTH CENTER, LLC
Within standard 12-15 month inspection cycle. Federal law requires annual inspections.
Courtyard Rehabilitation and Health Center in El Dorado, Arkansas, has a Trust Grade of B, indicating it is a good facility, making it a solid choice for families. It ranks #60 out of 218 in Arkansas, placing it in the top half of facilities statewide, and #2 out of 5 in Union County, meaning only one local option is better. However, the facility is worsening in terms of issues reported, increasing from 7 in 2023 to 8 in 2024. Staffing is a positive aspect, rated 4 out of 5 stars with a turnover rate of 28%, well below the state average, and they have more RN coverage than 93% of Arkansas facilities, which helps ensure better resident care. On the downside, there have been multiple concerns related to food safety practices, such as improper thawing and storage of raw meats and expired food items, which could increase the risk of foodborne illnesses for residents.
- Trust Score
- B
- In Arkansas
- #60/218
- Safety Record
- Low Risk
- Inspections
- Getting Worse
- Staff Stability ✓ Good
- 28% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 20 points below Arkansas's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
- Penalties ✓ Good
- No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Arkansas facilities.
- Skilled Nurses ○ Average
- Each resident gets 39 minutes of Registered Nurse (RN) attention daily — about average for Arkansas. RNs are the most trained staff who monitor for health changes.
- Violations ⚠ Watch
- 19 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
The Good
-
4-Star Staffing Rating · Above-average nurse staffing levels
-
5-Star Quality Measures · Strong clinical quality outcomes
-
Low Staff Turnover (28%) · Staff stability means consistent care
-
Full Sprinkler Coverage · Fire safety systems throughout facility
-
No fines on record
-
Staff turnover is low (28%)
20 points below Arkansas average of 48%
Facility shows strength in staffing levels, quality measures, staff retention, fire safety.
The Bad
Part of a multi-facility chain
Ask about local staffing decisions and management
The Ugly 19 deficiencies on record
Aug 2024
8 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Transfer Notice
(Tag F0623)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review, interviews and the facility failed to provide notice of discharge to 1 (Resident #76) sampled resident or the resident representative.
The findings include:
According to a Qua...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Assessment Accuracy
(Tag F0641)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
**NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY** Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was coded correc...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Accident Prevention
(Tag F0689)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that staff did not lower the head of the bed while 1 sampled (Resident #8) was receiving continuous enteral feeding.
...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Incontinence Care
(Tag F0690)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that incontinence care was provided in a manner to promote cleanliness for 1 (Resident #8) sampled resident.
The f...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observations, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure medications and/or biologicals were securely locked away.
The findings include:
On 08/26/24 at 6:05 PM, the...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0558
(Tag F0558)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the call device was within reach for 2 (Resident #8 and #63) sampled residents.
The findings include:
1. According ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Infection Control
(Tag F0880)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observations, interviews, record reviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that staff used appropriate infection control measures and donned the proper Personal Protec...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food, including raw meat, was thawed, stored, and sealed properly to prevent a potential foodborne illness; to ensure ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Sept 2023
7 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Comprehensive Care Plan
(Tag F0656)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a residents hand roll was placed in the hand nightly as care planned. This failed practice affected 1 Resident (Re...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure fingernails were regularly trimmed and cleaned to promote good personal hygiene and grooming for 2 (Residents #19 and #...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0761
(Tag F0761)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that refrigerated scheduled II-V controlled medications were maintained within a separately locked permanently affixed compartment in ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Menu Adequacy
(Tag F0803)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that meals were prepared and served according to the planned written menu to meet the nutritional needs of the resident...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0804
(Tag F0804)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure meals were served in a method that maintained the appearance of a cold product and at temperatures that were acceptable to the residen...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Deficiency F0805
(Tag F0805)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that pureed food items were blended to a smooth, lump free consistency to minimize the risk of choking or other complications for thos...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility ' s 1 of 1 ice machine was maintained in clean condition; foods stored in the storage area, refrigerator, ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Jun 2022
4 deficiencies
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Transfer Notice
(Tag F0623)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the resident/representative of the reason for transfer/discharge to the hospital in writing in a language they understand for 2 (Res...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(D)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
ADL Care
(Tag F0677)
Could have caused harm · This affected 1 resident
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure fingernails were regularly trimmed and cleaned to promote good personal hygiene and grooming for 1 (Resident #3) of 24 ...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(E)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Tube Feeding
(Tag F0693)
Could have caused harm · This affected multiple residents
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure enteral feedings and water flushes had a label on the formula bottle with the documented time they were hung for 1 (Res...
Read full inspector narrative →
CONCERN
(F)
Potential for Harm - no one hurt, but risky conditions existed
Food Safety
(Tag F0812)
Could have caused harm · This affected most or all residents
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food items were dated; expired food items were promptly removed /discarded on or before the expiration or use by dates; dietary staff ...
Read full inspector narrative →
Understanding Severity Codes (click to expand)
Questions to Ask on Your Visit
- "Can I speak with families of current residents?"
- "What's your RN coverage like on weekends and overnight?"
Our Honest Assessment
- • No major safety red flags. No abuse findings, life-threatening violations, or SFF status.
- • No fines on record. Clean compliance history, better than most Arkansas facilities.
- • 28% annual turnover. Excellent stability, 20 points below Arkansas's 48% average. Staff who stay learn residents' needs.
- • 19 deficiencies on record. Higher than average. Multiple issues found across inspections.
About This Facility
What is Courtyard Rehabilitation And, Llc's CMS Rating?
CMS assigns COURTYARD REHABILITATION AND HEALTH CENTER, LLC an overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars, which is considered above average nationally. Within Arkansas, this rating places the facility higher than 99% of the state's 100 nursing homes. This rating reflects solid performance across the metrics CMS uses to evaluate nursing home quality.
How is Courtyard Rehabilitation And, Llc Staffed?
CMS rates COURTYARD REHABILITATION AND HEALTH CENTER, LLC's staffing level at 4 out of 5 stars, which is above average compared to other nursing homes. Staff turnover is 28%, compared to the Arkansas average of 46%. This relatively stable workforce can support continuity of care.
What Have Inspectors Found at Courtyard Rehabilitation And, Llc?
State health inspectors documented 19 deficiencies at COURTYARD REHABILITATION AND HEALTH CENTER, LLC during 2022 to 2024. These included: 19 with potential for harm.
Who Owns and Operates Courtyard Rehabilitation And, Llc?
COURTYARD REHABILITATION AND HEALTH CENTER, LLC is owned by a for-profit company. For-profit facilities operate as businesses with obligations to shareholders or private owners. The facility is operated by SOUTHERN ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, a chain that manages multiple nursing homes. With 76 certified beds and approximately 73 residents (about 96% occupancy), it is a smaller facility located in EL DORADO, Arkansas.
How Does Courtyard Rehabilitation And, Llc Compare to Other Arkansas Nursing Homes?
Compared to the 100 nursing homes in Arkansas, COURTYARD REHABILITATION AND HEALTH CENTER, LLC's overall rating (4 stars) is above the state average of 3.1, staff turnover (28%) is significantly lower than the state average of 46%, and health inspection rating (3 stars) is at the national benchmark.
What Should Families Ask When Visiting Courtyard Rehabilitation And, Llc?
Based on this facility's data, families visiting should ask: "Can I visit during a mealtime to observe dining assistance and food quality?" "How do you handle medical emergencies, and what is your hospital transfer rate?" "Can I speak with family members of current residents about their experience?"
Is Courtyard Rehabilitation And, Llc Safe?
Based on CMS inspection data, COURTYARD REHABILITATION AND HEALTH CENTER, LLC has a clean safety record: no substantiated abuse findings (meaning no confirmed cases of resident harm), no Immediate Jeopardy citations (the most serious violation level indicating risk of serious injury or death), and is not on the Special Focus Facility watch list (a federal program monitoring the lowest-performing 1% of nursing homes). The facility has a 4-star overall rating and ranks #1 of 100 nursing homes in Arkansas. While no facility is perfect, families should still ask about staff-to-resident ratios and recent inspection results during their visit.
Do Nurses at Courtyard Rehabilitation And, Llc Stick Around?
Staff at COURTYARD REHABILITATION AND HEALTH CENTER, LLC tend to stick around. With a turnover rate of 28%, the facility is 18 percentage points below the Arkansas average of 46%. Low turnover is a positive sign. It means caregivers have time to learn each resident's needs, medications, and personal preferences. Consistent staff also notice subtle changes in a resident's condition more quickly. Registered Nurse turnover is also low at 11%, meaning experienced RNs are available to handle complex medical needs.
Was Courtyard Rehabilitation And, Llc Ever Fined?
COURTYARD REHABILITATION AND HEALTH CENTER, LLC has no federal fines on record. CMS issues fines when nursing homes fail to meet care standards or don't correct problems found during inspections. The absence of fines suggests the facility has either maintained compliance or corrected any issues before penalties were assessed. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review recent inspection reports for the full picture.
Is Courtyard Rehabilitation And, Llc on Any Federal Watch List?
COURTYARD REHABILITATION AND HEALTH CENTER, LLC is not on any federal watch list. The most significant is the Special Focus Facility (SFF) program, which identifies the bottom 1% of nursing homes nationally based on persistent, serious quality problems. Not being on this list means the facility has avoided the pattern of deficiencies that triggers enhanced federal oversight. This is a positive indicator, though families should still review the facility's inspection history directly.